ARM: intmath: use native-size return types for clipping functions

This avoids having the compiler redundantly mask the values to
the smaller size.

Signed-off-by: Mans Rullgard <mans@mansr.com>
x86: mlpdsp: avoid taking address of void

This code contains a C array of addresses of labels defined in
inline asm.  To do this, the names must be declared as external
in C.  The declared type does not matter since only the address is
used, and for some reason, the author of the code used the 'void'
type despite taking the address of a void expression being invalid.

Changing the type to char, a reasonable choice since the alignment
of the code labels cannot be known or guaranteed, eliminates gcc
warnings and allows building with suncc.

Signed-off-by: Mans Rullgard <mans@mansr.com>
x86: cabac: allow building with suncc

This fixes two issues preventing suncc from building this code.

The undocumented 'a' operand modifier, causing gcc to omit a $ in
front of immediate operands (as required in addresses), is not
supported by suncc.  Luckily, the also undocumented 'c' modifer
has the same effect and is supported.

On some asm statements with a large number of operands, suncc for no
obvious reason fails to correctly substitute some of the operands.
Fortunately, some of the operands in these statements are plain
numbers which can be inserted directly into the code block instead
of passed as operands.

With these changes, the code builds correctly with both gcc and
suncc.

Signed-off-by: Mans Rullgard <mans@mansr.com>
x86: yadif: fix asm with suncc

Under some circumstances, suncc will use a single register for the
address of all memory operands, inserting lea instructions loading
the correct address prior to each memory operand being used in the
code. In the yadif code, the branch in the asm block bypasses such
an lea instruction, causing an incorrect address to be used in the
following load.

This patch replaces the tmpX arrays with a single array and uses a
register operand to hold its address. Although this prevents using
offsets from the stack pointer to access these locations, the code
still builds as 32-bit PIC even with old compilers.

Signed-off-by: Mans Rullgard <mans@mansr.com>
x86: swscale: remove disabled code

This code has been disabled since 2003.  Nobody will ever look at
it again.

Signed-off-by: Mans Rullgard <mans@mansr.com>
x86: swscale: fix fragile memory accesses

To access data at multiple fixed offsets from a base address, this
code uses a single "m" operand and code of the form "32%0", relying on
the memory operand instantiation having no displacement, giving a final
result of the form "32(%rax)".  If the compiler uses a register and
displacement, e.g. "64(%rax)", the end result becomes "3264(%rax)",
which obviously does not work.

Replacing the "m" operands with "r" operands allows safe addition of a
displacement.  In theory, multiple memory operands could use a shared
base register with different index registers, "(%rax,%rbx)", potentially
making more efficient use of registers.  In the cases at hand, no such
sharing is possible since the addresses involved are entirely unrelated.

After this change, the code somewhat rudely accesses memory without
using a corresponding memory operand, which in some cases can lead to
unwanted "optimisations" of surrounding code.  However, the original
code also accesses memory not covered by a memory operand, so this is
not adding any defect not already present.  It is also hightly unlikely
that any such optimisations could be performed here since the memory
locations in questions are not accessed elsewhere in the same functions.

This fixes crashes with suncc.

Signed-off-by: Mans Rullgard <mans@mansr.com>