md/raid10: fix problem with on-stack allocation of r10bio structure.

A 'struct r10bio' has an array of per-copy information at the end.
This array is declared with size [0] and r10bio_pool_alloc allocates
enough extra space to store the per-copy information depending on the
number of copies needed.

So declaring a 'struct r10bio on the stack isn't going to work.  It
won't allocate enough space, and memory corruption will ensue.

So in the two places where this is done, declare a sufficiently large
structure and use that instead.

The two call-sites of this bug were introduced in 3.4 and 3.5
so this is suitable for both those kernels.  The patch will have to
be modified for 3.4 as it only has one bug.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reported-by: Ivan Vasilyev <ivan.vasilyev@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Ivan Vasilyev <ivan.vasilyev@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
block: makes bio_split support bio without data

discard bio hasn't data attached. We hit a BUG_ON with such bio. This makes
bio_split works for such bio.

Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
md: linear supports TRIM

This makes md linear support TRIM.

Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
md: raid 0 supports TRIM

This makes md raid 0 support TRIM.

Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
md: raid 1 supports TRIM

This makes md raid 1 support TRIM.
If one disk supports discard and another not, or one has discard_zero_data and
another not, there could be inconsistent between data from such disks. But this
should not matter, discarded data is useless. This will add extra copy in rebuild
though.

Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
md: raid 10 supports TRIM


This makes md raid 10 support TRIM.

If one disk supports discard and another not, or one has
discard_zero_data and another not, there could be inconsistent between
data from such disks. But this should not matter, discarded data is
useless. This will add extra copy in rebuild though.

Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
MD: change the parameter of md thread

Change the thread parameter, so the thread can carry extra info. Next patch
will use it.

Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
raid5: create multiple threads to handle stripes

This is a new tempt to make raid5 handle stripes in multiple threads, as
suggested by Neil to have maxium flexibility and better numa binding. It
basically is a combination of my first and second generation patches. By
default, no multiple thread is enabled (all stripes are handled by raid5d).

An example to enable multiple threads:
#echo 3 > /sys/block/md0/md/auxthread_number
This will create 3 auxiliary threads to handle stripes. The threads can run
on any cpus and handle stripes produced by any cpus.

#echo 1-3 > /sys/block/md0/md/auxth0/cpulist
This will bind auxiliary thread 0 to cpu 1-3, and this thread will only handle
stripes produced by cpu 1-3. User tool can further change the thread's
affinity, but the thread can only handle stripes produced by cpu 1-3 till the
sysfs entry is changed again.

If stripes produced by a CPU aren't handled by any auxiliary thread, such
stripes will be handled by raid5d. Otherwise, raid5d doesn't handle any
stripes.

Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
md/linear: rcu_dereference outside read-lock section

According to the comment in linear_stop function
rcu_dereference in linear_start and linear_stop functions
occurs under reconfig_mutex. The patch represents this
agreement in code and prevents lockdep complaint.

Found by Linux Driver Verification project (linuxtesting.org)

Signed-off-by: Denis Efremov <yefremov.denis@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
md: avoid taking the mutex on some ioctls.

Some ioctls don't need to take the mutex and doing so can cause
a delay as it is held during super-block update.
So move those ioctls out of the mutex and rely on rcu locking
to ensure we don't access stale data.

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>