UAPI: (Scripted) Disintegrate arch/openrisc/include/asm

Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
UAPI: (Scripted) Disintegrate include/linux/spi

Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
md/linear: rcu_dereference outside read-lock section

According to the comment in linear_stop function
rcu_dereference in linear_start and linear_stop functions
occurs under reconfig_mutex. The patch represents this
agreement in code and prevents lockdep complaint.

Found by Linux Driver Verification project (linuxtesting.org)

Signed-off-by: Denis Efremov <yefremov.denis@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
md: linear supports TRIM

This makes md linear support TRIM.

Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
md: raid 0 supports TRIM

This makes md raid 0 support TRIM.

Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
md: raid 1 supports TRIM

This makes md raid 1 support TRIM.
If one disk supports discard and another not, or one has discard_zero_data and
another not, there could be inconsistent between data from such disks. But this
should not matter, discarded data is useless. This will add extra copy in rebuild
though.

Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
md: raid 10 supports TRIM


This makes md raid 10 support TRIM.

If one disk supports discard and another not, or one has
discard_zero_data and another not, there could be inconsistent between
data from such disks. But this should not matter, discarded data is
useless. This will add extra copy in rebuild though.

Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
md/raid10: submit IO from originating thread instead of md thread.

queuing writes to the md thread means that all requests go through the
one processor which may not be able to keep up with very high request
rates.

So use the plugging infrastructure to submit all requests on unplug.
If a 'schedule' is needed, we fall back on the old approach of handing
the requests to the thread for it to handle.

This is nearly identical to a recent patch which provided similar
functionality to RAID1.

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
MD: change the parameter of md thread

Change the thread parameter, so the thread can carry extra info. Next patch
will use it.

Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
md: avoid taking the mutex on some ioctls.

Some ioctls don't need to take the mutex and doing so can cause
a delay as it is held during super-block update.
So move those ioctls out of the mutex and rely on rcu locking
to ensure we don't access stale data.

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
MD RAID10: Prep for DM RAID10 device replacement capability

MD RAID10:  Fix a couple potential kernel panics if RAID10 is used by dm-raid

When device-mapper uses the RAID10 personality through dm-raid.c, there is no
'gendisk' structure in mddev and some sysfs information is also not populated.

This patch avoids touching those non-existent structures.

Signed-off-by: Jonathan Brassow <jbrassow@rehdat.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
DM RAID: Move 'rebuild' checking code to its own function

DM RAID:  Move chunk of code to it's own function

The code that checks whether device replacements/rebuilds are possible given
a specific RAID type is moved to it's own function.  It will further expand
when the code to check RAID10 is added.  A separate function makes it easier
to read.

Signed-off-by: Jonathan Brassow <jbrassow@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
DM RAID: Add rebuild capability for RAID10

DM RAID:  Add code to validate replacement slots for RAID10 arrays

RAID10 can handle 'copies - 1' failures for each mirror group.  This code
ensures the user has provided a valid array - one whose devices specified for
rebuild do not exceed the amount of redundancy available.

Signed-off-by: Jonathan Brassow <jbrassow@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
DM RAID: Fix comparison of index and quantity for "rebuild" parameter

DM RAID: Fix comparison of index and quantity for "rebuild" parameter

The "rebuild" parameter takes an index argument that starts counting from
zero.  The conditional used to validate the index was using '>' rather than
'>=', leaving the door open for an index value that would be 1 too large.

Reported-by: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Brassow <jbrassow@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
DM RAID: Fix for "sync" directive ineffectiveness

There are two table arguments that can be given to a DM RAID target
that control whether the array is forced to (re)synchronize or skip
initialization: "sync" and "nosync".  When "sync" is given, we set
mddev->recovery_cp to 0 in order to cause the device to resynchronize.
This is insufficient if there is a bitmap in use, because the array
will simply look at the bitmap and see that there is no recovery
necessary.

The fix is to skip over the loading of the superblocks when "sync" is
given, causing new superblocks to be written that will force the array
to go through initialization (i.e. synchronization).

Signed-off-by: Jonathan Brassow <jbrassow@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
add further __init annotations to crypto/xor.c

Allow particularly do_xor_speed() to be discarded post-init.

Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
raid: replace list_for_each_continue_rcu with new interface

This patch replaces list_for_each_continue_rcu() with
list_for_each_entry_continue_rcu() to save a few lines
of code and allow removing list_for_each_continue_rcu().

Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Wang <wangyun@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
md/raid1: Don't release reference to device while handling read error.

When we get a read error, we arrange for raid1d to handle it.
Currently we release the reference on the device.  This can result
in
   conf->mirrors[read_disk].rdev
being NULL in fix_read_error, if the device happens to get removed
before the read error is handled.

So instead keep the reference until the read error has been fully
handled.

Reported-by: hank <pyu@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
md/bitmap:Don't use IS_ERR to judge alloc_page().

Signed-off-by: Jianpeng Ma <majianpeng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
MD: raid5 trim support


Discard for raid4/5/6 has limitation. If discard request size is
small, we do discard for one disk, but we need calculate parity and
write parity disk.  To correctly calculate parity, zero_after_discard
must be guaranteed. Even it's true, we need do discard for one disk
but write another disks, which makes the parity disks wear out
fast. This doesn't make sense. So an efficient discard for raid4/5/6
should discard all data disks and parity disks, which requires the
write pattern to be (A, A+chunk_size, A+chunk_size*2...). If A's size
is smaller than chunk_size, such pattern is almost impossible in
practice. So in this patch, I only handle the case that A's size
equals to chunk_size. That is discard request should be aligned to
stripe size and its size is multiple of stripe size.

Since we can only handle request with specific alignment and size (or
part of the request fitting stripes), we can't guarantee
zero_after_discard even zero_after_discard is true in low level
drives.

The block layer doesn't send down correctly aligned requests even
correct discard alignment is set, so I must filter out.

For raid4/5/6 parity calculation, if data is 0, parity is 0. So if
zero_after_discard is true for all disks, data is consistent after
discard.  Otherwise, data might be lost. Let's consider a scenario:
discard a stripe, write data to one disk and write parity disk. The
stripe could be still inconsistent till then depending on using data
from other data disks or parity disks to calculate new parity. If the
disk is broken, we can't restore it. So in this patch, we only enable
discard support if all disks have zero_after_discard.

If discard fails in one disk, we face the similar inconsistent issue
above. The patch will make discard follow the same path as normal
write request. If discard fails, a resync will be scheduled to make
the data consistent. This isn't good to have extra writes, but data
consistency is important.

If a subsequent read/write request hits raid5 cache of a discarded
stripe, the discarded dev page should have zero filled, so the data is
consistent. This patch will always zero dev page for discarded request
stripe. This isn't optimal because discard request doesn't need such
payload. Next patch will avoid it.

Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>