theorem evaln_complete {c n x} : x ∈ eval c n ↔ ∃ k, x ∈ evaln k c n :=
  ⟨fun h => by
    rsuffices ⟨k, h⟩ : ∃ k, x ∈ evaln (k + 1) c n
    · exact ⟨k + 1, h⟩
    induction c generalizing n x <;> simp [eval, evaln, pure, PFun.pure, Seq.seq, Bind.bind] at h ⊢
    iterate 4 exact ⟨⟨_, le_rfl⟩, h.symm⟩
    case pair cf cg hf hg =>
      rcases h with ⟨x, hx, y, hy, rfl⟩
      rcases hf hx with ⟨k₁, hk₁⟩; rcases hg hy with ⟨k₂, hk₂⟩
      refine' ⟨max k₁ k₂, _⟩
      refine'
        ⟨le_max_of_le_left <| Nat.le_of_lt_succ <| evaln_bound hk₁, _,
          evaln_mono (Nat.succ_le_succ <| le_max_left _ _) hk₁, _,
          evaln_mono (Nat.succ_le_succ <| le_max_right _ _) hk₂, rfl⟩
    case comp cf cg hf hg =>
      rcases h with ⟨y, hy, hx⟩
      rcases hg hy with ⟨k₁, hk₁⟩; rcases hf hx with ⟨k₂, hk₂⟩
      refine' ⟨max k₁ k₂, _⟩
      exact
        ⟨le_max_of_le_left <| Nat.le_of_lt_succ <| evaln_bound hk₁, _,
          evaln_mono (Nat.succ_le_succ <| le_max_left _ _) hk₁,
          evaln_mono (Nat.succ_le_succ <| le_max_right _ _) hk₂⟩
    case prec cf cg hf hg =>
      revert h
      generalize n.unpair.1 = n₁; generalize n.unpair.2 = n₂
      induction' n₂ with m IH generalizing x n <;> simp
      · intro h
        rcases hf h with ⟨k, hk⟩
        exact ⟨_, le_max_left _ _, evaln_mono (Nat.succ_le_succ <| le_max_right _ _) hk⟩
      · intro y hy hx
        rcases IH hy with ⟨k₁, nk₁, hk₁⟩
        rcases hg hx with ⟨k₂, hk₂⟩
        refine'
          ⟨(max k₁ k₂).succ,
            Nat.le_succ_of_le <| le_max_of_le_left <|
              le_trans (le_max_left _ (Nat.pair n₁ m)) nk₁, y,
            evaln_mono (Nat.succ_le_succ <| le_max_left _ _) _,
            evaln_mono (Nat.succ_le_succ <| Nat.le_succ_of_le <| le_max_right _ _) hk₂⟩
        simp only [evaln._eq_8, bind, unpaired, unpair_pair, Option.mem_def, Option.bind_eq_some,
          Option.guard_eq_some', exists_and_left, exists_const]
        exact ⟨le_trans (le_max_right _ _) nk₁, hk₁⟩
    case rfind' cf hf =>
      rcases h with ⟨y, ⟨hy₁, hy₂⟩, rfl⟩
      suffices ∃ k, y + n.unpair.2 ∈ evaln (k + 1) (rfind' cf) (Nat.pair n.unpair.1 n.unpair.2) by
        simpa [evaln, Bind.bind]
      revert hy₁ hy₂
      generalize n.unpair.2 = m
      intro hy₁ hy₂
      induction' y with y IH generalizing m <;> simp [evaln, Bind.bind]
      · simp at hy₁
        rcases hf hy₁ with ⟨k, hk⟩
        exact ⟨_, Nat.le_of_lt_succ <| evaln_bound hk, _, hk, by simp; rfl⟩
      · 

Proof state:
case intro.intro.intro.succ
cf : Code
hf : ∀ {n x : ℕ}, x ∈ eval cf n → ∃ k, x ∈ evaln (k + 1) cf n
n y : ℕ
IH :
  ∀ (m : ℕ),
    0 ∈ eval cf (Nat.pair (unpair n).1 (y + m)) →
      (∀ {m_1 : ℕ}, m_1 < y → ∃ a ∈ eval cf (Nat.pair (unpair n).1 (m_1 + m)), ¬a = 0) →
        ∃ k, y + m ∈ evaln (k + 1) (rfind' cf) (Nat.pair (unpair n).1 m)
m : ℕ
hy₁ : 0 ∈ eval cf (Nat.pair (unpair n).1 (Nat.succ y + m))
hy₂ : ∀ {m_1 : ℕ}, m_1 < Nat.succ y → ∃ a ∈ eval cf (Nat.pair (unpair n).1 (m_1 + m)), ¬a = 0
⊢ ∃ k,
    Nat.pair (unpair n).1 m ≤ k ∧
      ∃ a,
        evaln (k + 1) cf (Nat.pair (unpair n).1 m) = some a ∧
          (if a = 0 then pure m else evaln k (rfind' cf) (Nat.pair (unpair n).1 (m + 1))) = some (Nat.succ y + m)

Next tactic:
rcases hy₂ (Nat.succ_pos _) with ⟨a, ha, a0⟩