l3lab/ntp-mathlib huggingface dataset:
@[simp]
theorem nat_is_prime_iff : Prime (n : Cardinal) ↔ n.Prime := by
  simp only [Prime, Nat.prime_iff]
  refine' and_congr (by simp) (and_congr _ ⟨fun h b c hbc => _, fun h b c hbc => _⟩)
  · simp only [isUnit_iff, Nat.isUnit_iff]
    exact mod_cast Iff.rfl
  · exact mod_cast h b c (mod_cast hbc)
  cases' lt_or_le (b * c) ℵ₀ with h' h'
  · rcases mul_lt_aleph0_iff.mp h' with (rfl | rfl | ⟨hb, hc⟩)
    · simp
    · simp
    lift b to ℕ using hb
    lift c to ℕ using hc
    exact mod_cast h b c (mod_cast hbc)
  rcases aleph0_le_mul_iff.mp h' with ⟨hb, hc, hℵ₀⟩
  have hn : (n : Cardinal) ≠ 0 := by
    intro h
    rw [h, zero_dvd_iff, mul_eq_zero] at hbc
    cases hbc <;> contradiction
  wlog hℵ₀b : ℵ₀ ≤ b
  

Proof state:
case refine'_3.inr.intro.intro.inr
a b✝ : Cardinal.{u}
n m : ℕ
h : ∀ (a b : ℕ), n ∣ a * b → n ∣ a ∨ n ∣ b
b c : Cardinal.{u_1}
hbc : ↑n ∣ b * c
h' : ℵ₀ ≤ b * c
hb : b ≠ 0
hc : c ≠ 0
hℵ₀ : ℵ₀ ≤ b ∨ ℵ₀ ≤ c
hn : ↑n ≠ 0
this :
  ∀ {a b : Cardinal.{u}} {n : ℕ} {m : ℕ},
    (∀ (a b : ℕ), n ∣ a * b → n ∣ a ∨ n ∣ b) →
      ∀ (b c : Cardinal.{u_1}),
        ↑n ∣ b * c → ℵ₀ ≤ b * c → b ≠ 0 → c ≠ 0 → ℵ₀ ≤ b ∨ ℵ₀ ≤ c → ↑n ≠ 0 → ℵ₀ ≤ b → ↑n ∣ b ∨ ↑n ∣ c
hℵ₀b : ¬ℵ₀ ≤ b
⊢ ↑n ∣ b ∨ ↑n ∣ c

Next tactic:
refine' (this h c b _ _ hc hb hℵ₀.symm hn (hℵ₀.resolve_left hℵ₀b)).symm
@[simp]
theorem nat_is_prime_iff : Prime (n : Cardinal) ↔ n.Prime := by
  simp only [Prime, Nat.prime_iff]
  refine' and_congr (by simp) (and_congr _ ⟨fun h b c hbc => _, fun h b c hbc => _⟩)
  · simp only [isUnit_iff, Nat.isUnit_iff]
    exact mod_cast Iff.rfl
  · exact mod_cast h b c (mod_cast hbc)
  cases' lt_or_le (b * c) ℵ₀ with h' h'
  · rcases mul_lt_aleph0_iff.mp h' with (rfl | rfl | ⟨hb, hc⟩)
    · simp
    · simp
    lift b to ℕ using hb
    lift c to ℕ using hc
    exact mod_cast h b c (mod_cast hbc)
  rcases aleph0_le_mul_iff.mp h' with ⟨hb, hc, hℵ₀⟩
  have hn : (n : Cardinal) ≠ 0 := by
    intro h
    rw [h, zero_dvd_iff, mul_eq_zero] at hbc
    cases hbc <;> contradiction
  wlog hℵ₀b : ℵ₀ ≤ b
  refine' (this h c b _ _ hc hb hℵ₀.symm hn (hℵ₀.resolve_left hℵ₀b)).symm <;> 

Proof state:
case refine'_3.inr.intro.intro.inr.refine'_1
a b✝ : Cardinal.{u}
n m : ℕ
h : ∀ (a b : ℕ), n ∣ a * b → n ∣ a ∨ n ∣ b
b c : Cardinal.{u_1}
hbc : ↑n ∣ b * c
h' : ℵ₀ ≤ b * c
hb : b ≠ 0
hc : c ≠ 0
hℵ₀ : ℵ₀ ≤ b ∨ ℵ₀ ≤ c
hn : ↑n ≠ 0
this :
  ∀ {a b : Cardinal.{u}} {n : ℕ} {m : ℕ},
    (∀ (a b : ℕ), n ∣ a * b → n ∣ a ∨ n ∣ b) →
      ∀ (b c : Cardinal.{u_1}),
        ↑n ∣ b * c → ℵ₀ ≤ b * c → b ≠ 0 → c ≠ 0 → ℵ₀ ≤ b ∨ ℵ₀ ≤ c → ↑n ≠ 0 → ℵ₀ ≤ b → ↑n ∣ b ∨ ↑n ∣ c
hℵ₀b : ¬ℵ₀ ≤ b
⊢ Cardinal.{u}

Next tactic:
try assumption
@[simp]
theorem nat_is_prime_iff : Prime (n : Cardinal) ↔ n.Prime := by
  simp only [Prime, Nat.prime_iff]
  refine' and_congr (by simp) (and_congr _ ⟨fun h b c hbc => _, fun h b c hbc => _⟩)
  · simp only [isUnit_iff, Nat.isUnit_iff]
    exact mod_cast Iff.rfl
  · exact mod_cast h b c (mod_cast hbc)
  cases' lt_or_le (b * c) ℵ₀ with h' h'
  · rcases mul_lt_aleph0_iff.mp h' with (rfl | rfl | ⟨hb, hc⟩)
    · simp
    · simp
    lift b to ℕ using hb
    lift c to ℕ using hc
    exact mod_cast h b c (mod_cast hbc)
  rcases aleph0_le_mul_iff.mp h' with ⟨hb, hc, hℵ₀⟩
  have hn : (n : Cardinal) ≠ 0 := by
    intro h
    rw [h, zero_dvd_iff, mul_eq_zero] at hbc
    cases hbc <;> contradiction
  wlog hℵ₀b : ℵ₀ ≤ b
  refine' (this h c b _ _ hc hb hℵ₀.symm hn (hℵ₀.resolve_left hℵ₀b)).symm <;> try 

Proof state:
case refine'_3.inr.intro.intro.inr.refine'_1
a b✝ : Cardinal.{u}
n m : ℕ
h : ∀ (a b : ℕ), n ∣ a * b → n ∣ a ∨ n ∣ b
b c : Cardinal.{u_1}
hbc : ↑n ∣ b * c
h' : ℵ₀ ≤ b * c
hb : b ≠ 0
hc : c ≠ 0
hℵ₀ : ℵ₀ ≤ b ∨ ℵ₀ ≤ c
hn : ↑n ≠ 0
this :
  ∀ {a b : Cardinal.{u}} {n : ℕ} {m : ℕ},
    (∀ (a b : ℕ), n ∣ a * b → n ∣ a ∨ n ∣ b) →
      ∀ (b c : Cardinal.{u_1}),
        ↑n ∣ b * c → ℵ₀ ≤ b * c → b ≠ 0 → c ≠ 0 → ℵ₀ ≤ b ∨ ℵ₀ ≤ c → ↑n ≠ 0 → ℵ₀ ≤ b → ↑n ∣ b ∨ ↑n ∣ c
hℵ₀b : ¬ℵ₀ ≤ b
⊢ Cardinal.{u}

Next tactic:
assumption
@[simp]
theorem nat_is_prime_iff : Prime (n : Cardinal) ↔ n.Prime := by
  simp only [Prime, Nat.prime_iff]
  refine' and_congr (by simp) (and_congr _ ⟨fun h b c hbc => _, fun h b c hbc => _⟩)
  · simp only [isUnit_iff, Nat.isUnit_iff]
    exact mod_cast Iff.rfl
  · exact mod_cast h b c (mod_cast hbc)
  cases' lt_or_le (b * c) ℵ₀ with h' h'
  · rcases mul_lt_aleph0_iff.mp h' with (rfl | rfl | ⟨hb, hc⟩)
    · simp
    · simp
    lift b to ℕ using hb
    lift c to ℕ using hc
    exact mod_cast h b c (mod_cast hbc)
  rcases aleph0_le_mul_iff.mp h' with ⟨hb, hc, hℵ₀⟩
  have hn : (n : Cardinal) ≠ 0 := by
    intro h
    rw [h, zero_dvd_iff, mul_eq_zero] at hbc
    cases hbc <;> contradiction
  wlog hℵ₀b : ℵ₀ ≤ b
  refine' (this h c b _ _ hc hb hℵ₀.symm hn (hℵ₀.resolve_left hℵ₀b)).symm <;> 

Proof state:
case refine'_3.inr.intro.intro.inr.refine'_2
a b✝ : Cardinal.{u}
n m : ℕ
h : ∀ (a b : ℕ), n ∣ a * b → n ∣ a ∨ n ∣ b
b c : Cardinal.{u_1}
hbc : ↑n ∣ b * c
h' : ℵ₀ ≤ b * c
hb : b ≠ 0
hc : c ≠ 0
hℵ₀ : ℵ₀ ≤ b ∨ ℵ₀ ≤ c
hn : ↑n ≠ 0
this :
  ∀ {a b : Cardinal.{u}} {n : ℕ} {m : ℕ},
    (∀ (a b : ℕ), n ∣ a * b → n ∣ a ∨ n ∣ b) →
      ∀ (b c : Cardinal.{u_1}),
        ↑n ∣ b * c → ℵ₀ ≤ b * c → b ≠ 0 → c ≠ 0 → ℵ₀ ≤ b ∨ ℵ₀ ≤ c → ↑n ≠ 0 → ℵ₀ ≤ b → ↑n ∣ b ∨ ↑n ∣ c
hℵ₀b : ¬ℵ₀ ≤ b
⊢ Cardinal.{u}

Next tactic:
try assumption
@[simp]
theorem nat_is_prime_iff : Prime (n : Cardinal) ↔ n.Prime := by
  simp only [Prime, Nat.prime_iff]
  refine' and_congr (by simp) (and_congr _ ⟨fun h b c hbc => _, fun h b c hbc => _⟩)
  · simp only [isUnit_iff, Nat.isUnit_iff]
    exact mod_cast Iff.rfl
  · exact mod_cast h b c (mod_cast hbc)
  cases' lt_or_le (b * c) ℵ₀ with h' h'
  · rcases mul_lt_aleph0_iff.mp h' with (rfl | rfl | ⟨hb, hc⟩)
    · simp
    · simp
    lift b to ℕ using hb
    lift c to ℕ using hc
    exact mod_cast h b c (mod_cast hbc)
  rcases aleph0_le_mul_iff.mp h' with ⟨hb, hc, hℵ₀⟩
  have hn : (n : Cardinal) ≠ 0 := by
    intro h
    rw [h, zero_dvd_iff, mul_eq_zero] at hbc
    cases hbc <;> contradiction
  wlog hℵ₀b : ℵ₀ ≤ b
  refine' (this h c b _ _ hc hb hℵ₀.symm hn (hℵ₀.resolve_left hℵ₀b)).symm <;> try 

Proof state:
case refine'_3.inr.intro.intro.inr.refine'_2
a b✝ : Cardinal.{u}
n m : ℕ
h : ∀ (a b : ℕ), n ∣ a * b → n ∣ a ∨ n ∣ b
b c : Cardinal.{u_1}
hbc : ↑n ∣ b * c
h' : ℵ₀ ≤ b * c
hb : b ≠ 0
hc : c ≠ 0
hℵ₀ : ℵ₀ ≤ b ∨ ℵ₀ ≤ c
hn : ↑n ≠ 0
this :
  ∀ {a b : Cardinal.{u}} {n : ℕ} {m : ℕ},
    (∀ (a b : ℕ), n ∣ a * b → n ∣ a ∨ n ∣ b) →
      ∀ (b c : Cardinal.{u_1}),
        ↑n ∣ b * c → ℵ₀ ≤ b * c → b ≠ 0 → c ≠ 0 → ℵ₀ ≤ b ∨ ℵ₀ ≤ c → ↑n ≠ 0 → ℵ₀ ≤ b → ↑n ∣ b ∨ ↑n ∣ c
hℵ₀b : ¬ℵ₀ ≤ b
⊢ Cardinal.{u}

Next tactic:
assumption
@[simp]
theorem nat_is_prime_iff : Prime (n : Cardinal) ↔ n.Prime := by
  simp only [Prime, Nat.prime_iff]
  refine' and_congr (by simp) (and_congr _ ⟨fun h b c hbc => _, fun h b c hbc => _⟩)
  · simp only [isUnit_iff, Nat.isUnit_iff]
    exact mod_cast Iff.rfl
  · exact mod_cast h b c (mod_cast hbc)
  cases' lt_or_le (b * c) ℵ₀ with h' h'
  · rcases mul_lt_aleph0_iff.mp h' with (rfl | rfl | ⟨hb, hc⟩)
    · simp
    · simp
    lift b to ℕ using hb
    lift c to ℕ using hc
    exact mod_cast h b c (mod_cast hbc)
  rcases aleph0_le_mul_iff.mp h' with ⟨hb, hc, hℵ₀⟩
  have hn : (n : Cardinal) ≠ 0 := by
    intro h
    rw [h, zero_dvd_iff, mul_eq_zero] at hbc
    cases hbc <;> contradiction
  wlog hℵ₀b : ℵ₀ ≤ b
  refine' (this h c b _ _ hc hb hℵ₀.symm hn (hℵ₀.resolve_left hℵ₀b)).symm <;> 

Proof state:
case refine'_3.inr.intro.intro.inr.refine'_3
a b✝ : Cardinal.{u}
n m : ℕ
h : ∀ (a b : ℕ), n ∣ a * b → n ∣ a ∨ n ∣ b
b c : Cardinal.{u_1}
hbc : ↑n ∣ b * c
h' : ℵ₀ ≤ b * c
hb : b ≠ 0
hc : c ≠ 0
hℵ₀ : ℵ₀ ≤ b ∨ ℵ₀ ≤ c
hn : ↑n ≠ 0
this :
  ∀ {a b : Cardinal.{u}} {n : ℕ} {m : ℕ},
    (∀ (a b : ℕ), n ∣ a * b → n ∣ a ∨ n ∣ b) →
      ∀ (b c : Cardinal.{u_1}),
        ↑n ∣ b * c → ℵ₀ ≤ b * c → b ≠ 0 → c ≠ 0 → ℵ₀ ≤ b ∨ ℵ₀ ≤ c → ↑n ≠ 0 → ℵ₀ ≤ b → ↑n ∣ b ∨ ↑n ∣ c
hℵ₀b : ¬ℵ₀ ≤ b
⊢ ℕ

Next tactic:
try assumption
@[simp]
theorem nat_is_prime_iff : Prime (n : Cardinal) ↔ n.Prime := by
  simp only [Prime, Nat.prime_iff]
  refine' and_congr (by simp) (and_congr _ ⟨fun h b c hbc => _, fun h b c hbc => _⟩)
  · simp only [isUnit_iff, Nat.isUnit_iff]
    exact mod_cast Iff.rfl
  · exact mod_cast h b c (mod_cast hbc)
  cases' lt_or_le (b * c) ℵ₀ with h' h'
  · rcases mul_lt_aleph0_iff.mp h' with (rfl | rfl | ⟨hb, hc⟩)
    · simp
    · simp
    lift b to ℕ using hb
    lift c to ℕ using hc
    exact mod_cast h b c (mod_cast hbc)
  rcases aleph0_le_mul_iff.mp h' with ⟨hb, hc, hℵ₀⟩
  have hn : (n : Cardinal) ≠ 0 := by
    intro h
    rw [h, zero_dvd_iff, mul_eq_zero] at hbc
    cases hbc <;> contradiction
  wlog hℵ₀b : ℵ₀ ≤ b
  refine' (this h c b _ _ hc hb hℵ₀.symm hn (hℵ₀.resolve_left hℵ₀b)).symm <;> try 

Proof state:
case refine'_3.inr.intro.intro.inr.refine'_3
a b✝ : Cardinal.{u}
n m : ℕ
h : ∀ (a b : ℕ), n ∣ a * b → n ∣ a ∨ n ∣ b
b c : Cardinal.{u_1}
hbc : ↑n ∣ b * c
h' : ℵ₀ ≤ b * c
hb : b ≠ 0
hc : c ≠ 0
hℵ₀ : ℵ₀ ≤ b ∨ ℵ₀ ≤ c
hn : ↑n ≠ 0
this :
  ∀ {a b : Cardinal.{u}} {n : ℕ} {m : ℕ},
    (∀ (a b : ℕ), n ∣ a * b → n ∣ a ∨ n ∣ b) →
      ∀ (b c : Cardinal.{u_1}),
        ↑n ∣ b * c → ℵ₀ ≤ b * c → b ≠ 0 → c ≠ 0 → ℵ₀ ≤ b ∨ ℵ₀ ≤ c → ↑n ≠ 0 → ℵ₀ ≤ b → ↑n ∣ b ∨ ↑n ∣ c
hℵ₀b : ¬ℵ₀ ≤ b
⊢ ℕ

Next tactic:
assumption
@[simp]
theorem nat_is_prime_iff : Prime (n : Cardinal) ↔ n.Prime := by
  simp only [Prime, Nat.prime_iff]
  refine' and_congr (by simp) (and_congr _ ⟨fun h b c hbc => _, fun h b c hbc => _⟩)
  · simp only [isUnit_iff, Nat.isUnit_iff]
    exact mod_cast Iff.rfl
  · exact mod_cast h b c (mod_cast hbc)
  cases' lt_or_le (b * c) ℵ₀ with h' h'
  · rcases mul_lt_aleph0_iff.mp h' with (rfl | rfl | ⟨hb, hc⟩)
    · simp
    · simp
    lift b to ℕ using hb
    lift c to ℕ using hc
    exact mod_cast h b c (mod_cast hbc)
  rcases aleph0_le_mul_iff.mp h' with ⟨hb, hc, hℵ₀⟩
  have hn : (n : Cardinal) ≠ 0 := by
    intro h
    rw [h, zero_dvd_iff, mul_eq_zero] at hbc
    cases hbc <;> contradiction
  wlog hℵ₀b : ℵ₀ ≤ b
  refine' (this h c b _ _ hc hb hℵ₀.symm hn (hℵ₀.resolve_left hℵ₀b)).symm <;> 

Proof state:
case refine'_3.inr.intro.intro.inr.refine'_4
a b✝ : Cardinal.{u}
n m : ℕ
h : ∀ (a b : ℕ), n ∣ a * b → n ∣ a ∨ n ∣ b
b c : Cardinal.{u_1}
hbc : ↑n ∣ b * c
h' : ℵ₀ ≤ b * c
hb : b ≠ 0
hc : c ≠ 0
hℵ₀ : ℵ₀ ≤ b ∨ ℵ₀ ≤ c
hn : ↑n ≠ 0
this :
  ∀ {a b : Cardinal.{u}} {n : ℕ} {m : ℕ},
    (∀ (a b : ℕ), n ∣ a * b → n ∣ a ∨ n ∣ b) →
      ∀ (b c : Cardinal.{u_1}),
        ↑n ∣ b * c → ℵ₀ ≤ b * c → b ≠ 0 → c ≠ 0 → ℵ₀ ≤ b ∨ ℵ₀ ≤ c → ↑n ≠ 0 → ℵ₀ ≤ b → ↑n ∣ b ∨ ↑n ∣ c
hℵ₀b : ¬ℵ₀ ≤ b
⊢ ↑n ∣ c * b

Next tactic:
try assumption
@[simp]
theorem nat_is_prime_iff : Prime (n : Cardinal) ↔ n.Prime := by
  simp only [Prime, Nat.prime_iff]
  refine' and_congr (by simp) (and_congr _ ⟨fun h b c hbc => _, fun h b c hbc => _⟩)
  · simp only [isUnit_iff, Nat.isUnit_iff]
    exact mod_cast Iff.rfl
  · exact mod_cast h b c (mod_cast hbc)
  cases' lt_or_le (b * c) ℵ₀ with h' h'
  · rcases mul_lt_aleph0_iff.mp h' with (rfl | rfl | ⟨hb, hc⟩)
    · simp
    · simp
    lift b to ℕ using hb
    lift c to ℕ using hc
    exact mod_cast h b c (mod_cast hbc)
  rcases aleph0_le_mul_iff.mp h' with ⟨hb, hc, hℵ₀⟩
  have hn : (n : Cardinal) ≠ 0 := by
    intro h
    rw [h, zero_dvd_iff, mul_eq_zero] at hbc
    cases hbc <;> contradiction
  wlog hℵ₀b : ℵ₀ ≤ b
  refine' (this h c b _ _ hc hb hℵ₀.symm hn (hℵ₀.resolve_left hℵ₀b)).symm <;> try 

Proof state:
case refine'_3.inr.intro.intro.inr.refine'_4
a b✝ : Cardinal.{u}
n m : ℕ
h : ∀ (a b : ℕ), n ∣ a * b → n ∣ a ∨ n ∣ b
b c : Cardinal.{u_1}
hbc : ↑n ∣ b * c
h' : ℵ₀ ≤ b * c
hb : b ≠ 0
hc : c ≠ 0
hℵ₀ : ℵ₀ ≤ b ∨ ℵ₀ ≤ c
hn : ↑n ≠ 0
this :
  ∀ {a b : Cardinal.{u}} {n : ℕ} {m : ℕ},
    (∀ (a b : ℕ), n ∣ a * b → n ∣ a ∨ n ∣ b) →
      ∀ (b c : Cardinal.{u_1}),
        ↑n ∣ b * c → ℵ₀ ≤ b * c → b ≠ 0 → c ≠ 0 → ℵ₀ ≤ b ∨ ℵ₀ ≤ c → ↑n ≠ 0 → ℵ₀ ≤ b → ↑n ∣ b ∨ ↑n ∣ c
hℵ₀b : ¬ℵ₀ ≤ b
⊢ ↑n ∣ c * b

Next tactic:
assumption
@[simp]
theorem nat_is_prime_iff : Prime (n : Cardinal) ↔ n.Prime := by
  simp only [Prime, Nat.prime_iff]
  refine' and_congr (by simp) (and_congr _ ⟨fun h b c hbc => _, fun h b c hbc => _⟩)
  · simp only [isUnit_iff, Nat.isUnit_iff]
    exact mod_cast Iff.rfl
  · exact mod_cast h b c (mod_cast hbc)
  cases' lt_or_le (b * c) ℵ₀ with h' h'
  · rcases mul_lt_aleph0_iff.mp h' with (rfl | rfl | ⟨hb, hc⟩)
    · simp
    · simp
    lift b to ℕ using hb
    lift c to ℕ using hc
    exact mod_cast h b c (mod_cast hbc)
  rcases aleph0_le_mul_iff.mp h' with ⟨hb, hc, hℵ₀⟩
  have hn : (n : Cardinal) ≠ 0 := by
    intro h
    rw [h, zero_dvd_iff, mul_eq_zero] at hbc
    cases hbc <;> contradiction
  wlog hℵ₀b : ℵ₀ ≤ b
  refine' (this h c b _ _ hc hb hℵ₀.symm hn (hℵ₀.resolve_left hℵ₀b)).symm <;> 

Proof state:
case refine'_3.inr.intro.intro.inr.refine'_5
a b✝ : Cardinal.{u}
n m : ℕ
h : ∀ (a b : ℕ), n ∣ a * b → n ∣ a ∨ n ∣ b
b c : Cardinal.{u_1}
hbc : ↑n ∣ b * c
h' : ℵ₀ ≤ b * c
hb : b ≠ 0
hc : c ≠ 0
hℵ₀ : ℵ₀ ≤ b ∨ ℵ₀ ≤ c
hn : ↑n ≠ 0
this :
  ∀ {a b : Cardinal.{u}} {n : ℕ} {m : ℕ},
    (∀ (a b : ℕ), n ∣ a * b → n ∣ a ∨ n ∣ b) →
      ∀ (b c : Cardinal.{u_1}),
        ↑n ∣ b * c → ℵ₀ ≤ b * c → b ≠ 0 → c ≠ 0 → ℵ₀ ≤ b ∨ ℵ₀ ≤ c → ↑n ≠ 0 → ℵ₀ ≤ b → ↑n ∣ b ∨ ↑n ∣ c
hℵ₀b : ¬ℵ₀ ≤ b
⊢ ℵ₀ ≤ c * b

Next tactic:
try assumption
@[simp]
theorem nat_is_prime_iff : Prime (n : Cardinal) ↔ n.Prime := by
  simp only [Prime, Nat.prime_iff]
  refine' and_congr (by simp) (and_congr _ ⟨fun h b c hbc => _, fun h b c hbc => _⟩)
  · simp only [isUnit_iff, Nat.isUnit_iff]
    exact mod_cast Iff.rfl
  · exact mod_cast h b c (mod_cast hbc)
  cases' lt_or_le (b * c) ℵ₀ with h' h'
  · rcases mul_lt_aleph0_iff.mp h' with (rfl | rfl | ⟨hb, hc⟩)
    · simp
    · simp
    lift b to ℕ using hb
    lift c to ℕ using hc
    exact mod_cast h b c (mod_cast hbc)
  rcases aleph0_le_mul_iff.mp h' with ⟨hb, hc, hℵ₀⟩
  have hn : (n : Cardinal) ≠ 0 := by
    intro h
    rw [h, zero_dvd_iff, mul_eq_zero] at hbc
    cases hbc <;> contradiction
  wlog hℵ₀b : ℵ₀ ≤ b
  refine' (this h c b _ _ hc hb hℵ₀.symm hn (hℵ₀.resolve_left hℵ₀b)).symm <;> try 

Proof state:
case refine'_3.inr.intro.intro.inr.refine'_5
a b✝ : Cardinal.{u}
n m : ℕ
h : ∀ (a b : ℕ), n ∣ a * b → n ∣ a ∨ n ∣ b
b c : Cardinal.{u_1}
hbc : ↑n ∣ b * c
h' : ℵ₀ ≤ b * c
hb : b ≠ 0
hc : c ≠ 0
hℵ₀ : ℵ₀ ≤ b ∨ ℵ₀ ≤ c
hn : ↑n ≠ 0
this :
  ∀ {a b : Cardinal.{u}} {n : ℕ} {m : ℕ},
    (∀ (a b : ℕ), n ∣ a * b → n ∣ a ∨ n ∣ b) →
      ∀ (b c : Cardinal.{u_1}),
        ↑n ∣ b * c → ℵ₀ ≤ b * c → b ≠ 0 → c ≠ 0 → ℵ₀ ≤ b ∨ ℵ₀ ≤ c → ↑n ≠ 0 → ℵ₀ ≤ b → ↑n ∣ b ∨ ↑n ∣ c
hℵ₀b : ¬ℵ₀ ≤ b
⊢ ℵ₀ ≤ c * b

Next tactic:
assumption
@[simp]
theorem nat_is_prime_iff : Prime (n : Cardinal) ↔ n.Prime := by
  simp only [Prime, Nat.prime_iff]
  refine' and_congr (by simp) (and_congr _ ⟨fun h b c hbc => _, fun h b c hbc => _⟩)
  · simp only [isUnit_iff, Nat.isUnit_iff]
    exact mod_cast Iff.rfl
  · exact mod_cast h b c (mod_cast hbc)
  cases' lt_or_le (b * c) ℵ₀ with h' h'
  · rcases mul_lt_aleph0_iff.mp h' with (rfl | rfl | ⟨hb, hc⟩)
    · simp
    · simp
    lift b to ℕ using hb
    lift c to ℕ using hc
    exact mod_cast h b c (mod_cast hbc)
  rcases aleph0_le_mul_iff.mp h' with ⟨hb, hc, hℵ₀⟩
  have hn : (n : Cardinal) ≠ 0 := by
    intro h
    rw [h, zero_dvd_iff, mul_eq_zero] at hbc
    cases hbc <;> contradiction
  wlog hℵ₀b : ℵ₀ ≤ b
  refine' (this h c b _ _ hc hb hℵ₀.symm hn (hℵ₀.resolve_left hℵ₀b)).symm <;> try assumption
  

Proof state:
case refine'_3.inr.intro.intro.inr.refine'_4
a b✝ : Cardinal.{u}
n m : ℕ
h : ∀ (a b : ℕ), n ∣ a * b → n ∣ a ∨ n ∣ b
b c : Cardinal.{u_1}
hbc : ↑n ∣ b * c
h' : ℵ₀ ≤ b * c
hb : b ≠ 0
hc : c ≠ 0
hℵ₀ : ℵ₀ ≤ b ∨ ℵ₀ ≤ c
hn : ↑n ≠ 0
this :
  ∀ {a b : Cardinal.{u}} {n : ℕ} {m : ℕ},
    (∀ (a b : ℕ), n ∣ a * b → n ∣ a ∨ n ∣ b) →
      ∀ (b c : Cardinal.{u_1}),
        ↑n ∣ b * c → ℵ₀ ≤ b * c → b ≠ 0 → c ≠ 0 → ℵ₀ ≤ b ∨ ℵ₀ ≤ c → ↑n ≠ 0 → ℵ₀ ≤ b → ↑n ∣ b ∨ ↑n ∣ c
hℵ₀b : ¬ℵ₀ ≤ b
⊢ ↑n ∣ c * b
case refine'_3.inr.intro.intro.inr.refine'_5
a b✝ : Cardinal.{u}
n m : ℕ
h : ∀ (a b : ℕ), n ∣ a * b → n ∣ a ∨ n ∣ b
b c : Cardinal.{u_1}
hbc : ↑n ∣ b * c
h' : ℵ₀ ≤ b * c
hb : b ≠ 0
hc : c ≠ 0
hℵ₀ : ℵ₀ ≤ b ∨ ℵ₀ ≤ c
hn : ↑n ≠ 0
this :
  ∀ {a b : Cardinal.{u}} {n : ℕ} {m : ℕ},
    (∀ (a b : ℕ), n ∣ a * b → n ∣ a ∨ n ∣ b) →
      ∀ (b c : Cardinal.{u_1}),
        ↑n ∣ b * c → ℵ₀ ≤ b * c → b ≠ 0 → c ≠ 0 → ℵ₀ ≤ b ∨ ℵ₀ ≤ c → ↑n ≠ 0 → ℵ₀ ≤ b → ↑n ∣ b ∨ ↑n ∣ c
hℵ₀b : ¬ℵ₀ ≤ b
⊢ ℵ₀ ≤ c * b
n✝ : ℕ
a b✝ : Cardinal.{u}
n m : ℕ
h : ∀ (a b : ℕ), n ∣ a * b → n ∣ a ∨ n ∣ b
b c : Cardinal.{u_1}
hbc : ↑n ∣ b * c
h' : ℵ₀ ≤ b * c
hb : b ≠ 0
hc : c ≠ 0
hℵ₀ : ℵ₀ ≤ b ∨ ℵ₀ ≤ c
hn : ↑n ≠ 0
hℵ₀b : ℵ₀ ≤ b
⊢ ↑n ∣ b ∨ ↑n ∣ c

Next tactic:
rwa [mul_comm] at hbc
@[simp]
theorem nat_is_prime_iff : Prime (n : Cardinal) ↔ n.Prime := by
  simp only [Prime, Nat.prime_iff]
  refine' and_congr (by simp) (and_congr _ ⟨fun h b c hbc => _, fun h b c hbc => _⟩)
  · simp only [isUnit_iff, Nat.isUnit_iff]
    exact mod_cast Iff.rfl
  · exact mod_cast h b c (mod_cast hbc)
  cases' lt_or_le (b * c) ℵ₀ with h' h'
  · rcases mul_lt_aleph0_iff.mp h' with (rfl | rfl | ⟨hb, hc⟩)
    · simp
    · simp
    lift b to ℕ using hb
    lift c to ℕ using hc
    exact mod_cast h b c (mod_cast hbc)
  rcases aleph0_le_mul_iff.mp h' with ⟨hb, hc, hℵ₀⟩
  have hn : (n : Cardinal) ≠ 0 := by
    intro h
    rw [h, zero_dvd_iff, mul_eq_zero] at hbc
    cases hbc <;> contradiction
  wlog hℵ₀b : ℵ₀ ≤ b
  refine' (this h c b _ _ hc hb hℵ₀.symm hn (hℵ₀.resolve_left hℵ₀b)).symm <;> try assumption
  rwa [mul_comm] at hbc
  

Proof state:
case refine'_3.inr.intro.intro.inr.refine'_5
a b✝ : Cardinal.{u}
n m : ℕ
h : ∀ (a b : ℕ), n ∣ a * b → n ∣ a ∨ n ∣ b
b c : Cardinal.{u_1}
hbc : ↑n ∣ b * c
h' : ℵ₀ ≤ b * c
hb : b ≠ 0
hc : c ≠ 0
hℵ₀ : ℵ₀ ≤ b ∨ ℵ₀ ≤ c
hn : ↑n ≠ 0
this :
  ∀ {a b : Cardinal.{u}} {n : ℕ} {m : ℕ},
    (∀ (a b : ℕ), n ∣ a * b → n ∣ a ∨ n ∣ b) →
      ∀ (b c : Cardinal.{u_1}),
        ↑n ∣ b * c → ℵ₀ ≤ b * c → b ≠ 0 → c ≠ 0 → ℵ₀ ≤ b ∨ ℵ₀ ≤ c → ↑n ≠ 0 → ℵ₀ ≤ b → ↑n ∣ b ∨ ↑n ∣ c
hℵ₀b : ¬ℵ₀ ≤ b
⊢ ℵ₀ ≤ c * b
n✝ : ℕ
a b✝ : Cardinal.{u}
n m : ℕ
h : ∀ (a b : ℕ), n ∣ a * b → n ∣ a ∨ n ∣ b
b c : Cardinal.{u_1}
hbc : ↑n ∣ b * c
h' : ℵ₀ ≤ b * c
hb : b ≠ 0
hc : c ≠ 0
hℵ₀ : ℵ₀ ≤ b ∨ ℵ₀ ≤ c
hn : ↑n ≠ 0
hℵ₀b : ℵ₀ ≤ b
⊢ ↑n ∣ b ∨ ↑n ∣ c

Next tactic:
rwa [mul_comm] at h'
@[simp]
theorem nat_is_prime_iff : Prime (n : Cardinal) ↔ n.Prime := by
  simp only [Prime, Nat.prime_iff]
  refine' and_congr (by simp) (and_congr _ ⟨fun h b c hbc => _, fun h b c hbc => _⟩)
  · simp only [isUnit_iff, Nat.isUnit_iff]
    exact mod_cast Iff.rfl
  · exact mod_cast h b c (mod_cast hbc)
  cases' lt_or_le (b * c) ℵ₀ with h' h'
  · rcases mul_lt_aleph0_iff.mp h' with (rfl | rfl | ⟨hb, hc⟩)
    · simp
    · simp
    lift b to ℕ using hb
    lift c to ℕ using hc
    exact mod_cast h b c (mod_cast hbc)
  rcases aleph0_le_mul_iff.mp h' with ⟨hb, hc, hℵ₀⟩
  have hn : (n : Cardinal) ≠ 0 := by
    intro h
    rw [h, zero_dvd_iff, mul_eq_zero] at hbc
    cases hbc <;> contradiction
  wlog hℵ₀b : ℵ₀ ≤ b
  refine' (this h c b _ _ hc hb hℵ₀.symm hn (hℵ₀.resolve_left hℵ₀b)).symm <;> try assumption
  rwa [mul_comm] at hbc
  rwa [mul_comm] at h'
  

Proof state:
n✝ : ℕ
a b✝ : Cardinal.{u}
n m : ℕ
h : ∀ (a b : ℕ), n ∣ a * b → n ∣ a ∨ n ∣ b
b c : Cardinal.{u_1}
hbc : ↑n ∣ b * c
h' : ℵ₀ ≤ b * c
hb : b ≠ 0
hc : c ≠ 0
hℵ₀ : ℵ₀ ≤ b ∨ ℵ₀ ≤ c
hn : ↑n ≠ 0
hℵ₀b : ℵ₀ ≤ b
⊢ ↑n ∣ b ∨ ↑n ∣ c

Next tactic:
exact Or.inl (dvd_of_le_of_aleph0_le hn ((nat_lt_aleph0 n).le.trans hℵ₀b) hℵ₀b)
theorem is_prime_iff {a : Cardinal} : Prime a ↔ ℵ₀ ≤ a ∨ ∃ p : ℕ, a = p ∧ p.Prime := by
  

Proof state:
a✝ b : Cardinal.{u}
n m : ℕ
a : Cardinal.{u_1}
⊢ Prime a ↔ ℵ₀ ≤ a ∨ ∃ p, a = ↑p ∧ Nat.Prime p

Next tactic:
rcases le_or_lt ℵ₀ a with h | h
theorem is_prime_iff {a : Cardinal} : Prime a ↔ ℵ₀ ≤ a ∨ ∃ p : ℕ, a = p ∧ p.Prime := by
  rcases le_or_lt ℵ₀ a with h | h
  · 

Proof state:
case inl
a✝ b : Cardinal.{u}
n m : ℕ
a : Cardinal.{u_1}
h : ℵ₀ ≤ a
⊢ Prime a ↔ ℵ₀ ≤ a ∨ ∃ p, a = ↑p ∧ Nat.Prime p

Next tactic:
simp [h]
theorem is_prime_iff {a : Cardinal} : Prime a ↔ ℵ₀ ≤ a ∨ ∃ p : ℕ, a = p ∧ p.Prime := by
  rcases le_or_lt ℵ₀ a with h | h
  · simp [h]
  

Proof state:
case inr
a✝ b : Cardinal.{u}
n m : ℕ
a : Cardinal.{u_1}
h : a < ℵ₀
⊢ Prime a ↔ ℵ₀ ≤ a ∨ ∃ p, a = ↑p ∧ Nat.Prime p

Next tactic:
lift a to ℕ using id h
theorem is_prime_iff {a : Cardinal} : Prime a ↔ ℵ₀ ≤ a ∨ ∃ p : ℕ, a = p ∧ p.Prime := by
  rcases le_or_lt ℵ₀ a with h | h
  · simp [h]
  lift a to ℕ using id h
  

Proof state:
case inr.intro
a✝ b : Cardinal.{u}
n m a : ℕ
h : ↑a < ℵ₀
⊢ Prime ↑a ↔ ℵ₀ ≤ ↑a ∨ ∃ p, ↑a = ↑p ∧ Nat.Prime p

Next tactic:
simp [not_le.mpr h]
theorem isPrimePow_iff {a : Cardinal} : IsPrimePow a ↔ ℵ₀ ≤ a ∨ ∃ n : ℕ, a = n ∧ IsPrimePow n := by
  

Proof state:
a✝ b : Cardinal.{u}
n m : ℕ
a : Cardinal.{u_1}
⊢ IsPrimePow a ↔ ℵ₀ ≤ a ∨ ∃ n, a = ↑n ∧ IsPrimePow n

Next tactic:
by_cases h : ℵ₀ ≤ a
theorem isPrimePow_iff {a : Cardinal} : IsPrimePow a ↔ ℵ₀ ≤ a ∨ ∃ n : ℕ, a = n ∧ IsPrimePow n := by
  by_cases h : ℵ₀ ≤ a
  · 

Proof state:
case pos
a✝ b : Cardinal.{u}
n m : ℕ
a : Cardinal.{u_1}
h : ℵ₀ ≤ a
⊢ IsPrimePow a ↔ ℵ₀ ≤ a ∨ ∃ n, a = ↑n ∧ IsPrimePow n

Next tactic:
simp [h, (prime_of_aleph0_le h).isPrimePow]
theorem isPrimePow_iff {a : Cardinal} : IsPrimePow a ↔ ℵ₀ ≤ a ∨ ∃ n : ℕ, a = n ∧ IsPrimePow n := by
  by_cases h : ℵ₀ ≤ a
  · simp [h, (prime_of_aleph0_le h).isPrimePow]
  

Proof state:
case neg
a✝ b : Cardinal.{u}
n m : ℕ
a : Cardinal.{u_1}
h : ¬ℵ₀ ≤ a
⊢ IsPrimePow a ↔ ℵ₀ ≤ a ∨ ∃ n, a = ↑n ∧ IsPrimePow n

Next tactic:
simp only [h, Nat.cast_inj, exists_eq_left', false_or_iff, isPrimePow_nat_iff]
theorem isPrimePow_iff {a : Cardinal} : IsPrimePow a ↔ ℵ₀ ≤ a ∨ ∃ n : ℕ, a = n ∧ IsPrimePow n := by
  by_cases h : ℵ₀ ≤ a
  · simp [h, (prime_of_aleph0_le h).isPrimePow]
  simp only [h, Nat.cast_inj, exists_eq_left', false_or_iff, isPrimePow_nat_iff]
  

Proof state:
case neg
a✝ b : Cardinal.{u}
n m : ℕ
a : Cardinal.{u_1}
h : ¬ℵ₀ ≤ a
⊢ IsPrimePow a ↔ ∃ n, a = ↑n ∧ ∃ p k, Nat.Prime p ∧ 0 < k ∧ p ^ k = n

Next tactic:
lift a to ℕ using not_le.mp h
theorem isPrimePow_iff {a : Cardinal} : IsPrimePow a ↔ ℵ₀ ≤ a ∨ ∃ n : ℕ, a = n ∧ IsPrimePow n := by
  by_cases h : ℵ₀ ≤ a
  · simp [h, (prime_of_aleph0_le h).isPrimePow]
  simp only [h, Nat.cast_inj, exists_eq_left', false_or_iff, isPrimePow_nat_iff]
  lift a to ℕ using not_le.mp h
  

Proof state:
case neg.intro
a✝ b : Cardinal.{u}
n m a : ℕ
h : ¬ℵ₀ ≤ ↑a
⊢ IsPrimePow ↑a ↔ ∃ n, ↑a = ↑n ∧ ∃ p k, Nat.Prime p ∧ 0 < k ∧ p ^ k = n

Next tactic:
rw [isPrimePow_def]
theorem isPrimePow_iff {a : Cardinal} : IsPrimePow a ↔ ℵ₀ ≤ a ∨ ∃ n : ℕ, a = n ∧ IsPrimePow n := by
  by_cases h : ℵ₀ ≤ a
  · simp [h, (prime_of_aleph0_le h).isPrimePow]
  simp only [h, Nat.cast_inj, exists_eq_left', false_or_iff, isPrimePow_nat_iff]
  lift a to ℕ using not_le.mp h
  rw [isPrimePow_def]
  

Proof state:
case neg.intro
a✝ b : Cardinal.{u}
n m a : ℕ
h : ¬ℵ₀ ≤ ↑a
⊢ (∃ p k, Prime p ∧ 0 < k ∧ p ^ k = ↑a) ↔ ∃ n, ↑a = ↑n ∧ ∃ p k, Nat.Prime p ∧ 0 < k ∧ p ^ k = n

Next tactic:
refine'
    ⟨_, fun ⟨n, han, p, k, hp, hk, h⟩ =>
          ⟨p, k, nat_is_prime_iff.2 hp, hk, by rw [han]; exact mod_cast h⟩⟩
theorem isPrimePow_iff {a : Cardinal} : IsPrimePow a ↔ ℵ₀ ≤ a ∨ ∃ n : ℕ, a = n ∧ IsPrimePow n := by
  by_cases h : ℵ₀ ≤ a
  · simp [h, (prime_of_aleph0_le h).isPrimePow]
  simp only [h, Nat.cast_inj, exists_eq_left', false_or_iff, isPrimePow_nat_iff]
  lift a to ℕ using not_le.mp h
  rw [isPrimePow_def]
  refine'
    ⟨_, fun ⟨n, han, p, k, hp, hk, h⟩ =>
          ⟨p, k, nat_is_prime_iff.2 hp, hk, by 

Proof state:
a✝ b : Cardinal.{u}
n✝ m a : ℕ
h✝ : ¬ℵ₀ ≤ ↑a
x✝ : ∃ n, ↑a = ↑n ∧ ∃ p k, Nat.Prime p ∧ 0 < k ∧ p ^ k = n
n : ℕ
han : ↑a = ↑n
p k : ℕ
hp : Nat.Prime p
hk : 0 < k
h : p ^ k = n
⊢ ↑p ^ k = ↑a

Next tactic:
rw [han]
theorem isPrimePow_iff {a : Cardinal} : IsPrimePow a ↔ ℵ₀ ≤ a ∨ ∃ n : ℕ, a = n ∧ IsPrimePow n := by
  by_cases h : ℵ₀ ≤ a
  · simp [h, (prime_of_aleph0_le h).isPrimePow]
  simp only [h, Nat.cast_inj, exists_eq_left', false_or_iff, isPrimePow_nat_iff]
  lift a to ℕ using not_le.mp h
  rw [isPrimePow_def]
  refine'
    ⟨_, fun ⟨n, han, p, k, hp, hk, h⟩ =>
          ⟨p, k, nat_is_prime_iff.2 hp, hk, by rw [han]; 

Proof state:
a✝ b : Cardinal.{u}
n✝ m a : ℕ
h✝ : ¬ℵ₀ ≤ ↑a
x✝ : ∃ n, ↑a = ↑n ∧ ∃ p k, Nat.Prime p ∧ 0 < k ∧ p ^ k = n
n : ℕ
han : ↑a = ↑n
p k : ℕ
hp : Nat.Prime p
hk : 0 < k
h : p ^ k = n
⊢ ↑p ^ k = ↑n

Next tactic:
exact mod_cast h