l3lab/ntp-mathlib huggingface dataset:
/-- **Phragmen-Lindelöf principle** in a strip `U = {z : ℂ | a < im z < b}`.
Let `f : ℂ → E` be a function such that

* `f` is differentiable on `U` and is continuous on its closure;
* `‖f z‖` is bounded from above by `A * exp(B * exp(c * |re z|))` on `U` for some `c < π / (b - a)`;
* `‖f z‖` is bounded from above by a constant `C` on the boundary of `U`.

Then `‖f z‖` is bounded by the same constant on the closed strip
`{z : ℂ | a ≤ im z ≤ b}`. Moreover, it suffices to verify the second assumption
only for sufficiently large values of `|re z|`.
-/
theorem horizontal_strip (hfd : DiffContOnCl ℂ f (im ⁻¹' Ioo a b))
    (hB : ∃ c < π / (b - a), ∃ B,
      f =O[comap (Abs.abs ∘ re) atTop ⊓ 𝓟 (im ⁻¹' Ioo a b)] fun z ↦ expR (B * expR (c * |z.re|)))
    (hle_a : ∀ z : ℂ, im z = a → ‖f z‖ ≤ C) (hle_b : ∀ z, im z = b → ‖f z‖ ≤ C) (hza : a ≤ im z)
    (hzb : im z ≤ b) : ‖f z‖ ≤ C := by
  -- If `im z = a` or `im z = b`, then we apply `hle_a` or `hle_b`, otherwise `im z ∈ Ioo a b`.
  rw [le_iff_eq_or_lt] at hza hzb
  cases' hza with hza hza; · exact hle_a _ hza.symm
  cases' hzb with hzb hzb; · exact hle_b _ hzb
  wlog hC₀ : 0 < C generalizing C
  · refine' le_of_forall_le_of_dense fun C' hC' => this (fun w hw => _) (fun w hw => _) _
    · exact (hle_a _ hw).trans hC'.le
    · exact (hle_b _ hw).trans hC'.le
    · refine' ((norm_nonneg (f (a * I))).trans (hle_a _ _)).trans_lt hC'
      rw [mul_I_im, ofReal_re]
  -- After a change of variables, we deal with the strip `a - b < im z < a + b` instead
  -- of `a < im z < b`
  obtain ⟨a, b, rfl, rfl⟩ : ∃ a' b', a = a' - b' ∧ b = a' + b' :=
    ⟨(a + b) / 2, (b - a) / 2, by ring, by ring⟩
  have hab : a - b < a + b := hza.trans hzb
  have hb : 0 < b := by simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg, add_lt_add_iff_left, neg_lt_self_iff] using hab
  rw [add_sub_sub_cancel, ← two_mul, div_mul_eq_div_div] at hB
  have hπb : 0 < π / 2 / b := div_pos Real.pi_div_two_pos hb
  -- Choose some `c B : ℝ` satisfying `hB`, then choose `max c 0 < d < π / 2 / b`.
  

Proof state:
case intro.intro.intro
E : Type u_1
inst✝¹ : NormedAddCommGroup E
inst✝ : NormedSpace ℂ E
C✝ : ℝ
f g : ℂ → E
z : ℂ
C : ℝ
hC₀ : 0 < C
a b : ℝ
hza : a - b < z.im
hle_a : ∀ (z : ℂ), z.im = a - b → ‖f z‖ ≤ C
hzb : z.im < a + b
hle_b : ∀ (z : ℂ), z.im = a + b → ‖f z‖ ≤ C
hfd : DiffContOnCl ℂ f (im ⁻¹' Ioo (a - b) (a + b))
hB :
  ∃ c < π / 2 / b,
    ∃ B, f =O[comap (Abs.abs ∘ re) atTop ⊓ 𝓟 (im ⁻¹' Ioo (a - b) (a + b))] fun z => expR (B * expR (c * |z.re|))
hab : a - b < a + b
hb : 0 < b
hπb : 0 < π / 2 / b
⊢ ‖f z‖ ≤ C

Next tactic:
rcases hB with ⟨c, hc, B, hO⟩
/-- **Phragmen-Lindelöf principle** in a strip `U = {z : ℂ | a < im z < b}`.
Let `f : ℂ → E` be a function such that

* `f` is differentiable on `U` and is continuous on its closure;
* `‖f z‖` is bounded from above by `A * exp(B * exp(c * |re z|))` on `U` for some `c < π / (b - a)`;
* `‖f z‖` is bounded from above by a constant `C` on the boundary of `U`.

Then `‖f z‖` is bounded by the same constant on the closed strip
`{z : ℂ | a ≤ im z ≤ b}`. Moreover, it suffices to verify the second assumption
only for sufficiently large values of `|re z|`.
-/
theorem horizontal_strip (hfd : DiffContOnCl ℂ f (im ⁻¹' Ioo a b))
    (hB : ∃ c < π / (b - a), ∃ B,
      f =O[comap (Abs.abs ∘ re) atTop ⊓ 𝓟 (im ⁻¹' Ioo a b)] fun z ↦ expR (B * expR (c * |z.re|)))
    (hle_a : ∀ z : ℂ, im z = a → ‖f z‖ ≤ C) (hle_b : ∀ z, im z = b → ‖f z‖ ≤ C) (hza : a ≤ im z)
    (hzb : im z ≤ b) : ‖f z‖ ≤ C := by
  -- If `im z = a` or `im z = b`, then we apply `hle_a` or `hle_b`, otherwise `im z ∈ Ioo a b`.
  rw [le_iff_eq_or_lt] at hza hzb
  cases' hza with hza hza; · exact hle_a _ hza.symm
  cases' hzb with hzb hzb; · exact hle_b _ hzb
  wlog hC₀ : 0 < C generalizing C
  · refine' le_of_forall_le_of_dense fun C' hC' => this (fun w hw => _) (fun w hw => _) _
    · exact (hle_a _ hw).trans hC'.le
    · exact (hle_b _ hw).trans hC'.le
    · refine' ((norm_nonneg (f (a * I))).trans (hle_a _ _)).trans_lt hC'
      rw [mul_I_im, ofReal_re]
  -- After a change of variables, we deal with the strip `a - b < im z < a + b` instead
  -- of `a < im z < b`
  obtain ⟨a, b, rfl, rfl⟩ : ∃ a' b', a = a' - b' ∧ b = a' + b' :=
    ⟨(a + b) / 2, (b - a) / 2, by ring, by ring⟩
  have hab : a - b < a + b := hza.trans hzb
  have hb : 0 < b := by simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg, add_lt_add_iff_left, neg_lt_self_iff] using hab
  rw [add_sub_sub_cancel, ← two_mul, div_mul_eq_div_div] at hB
  have hπb : 0 < π / 2 / b := div_pos Real.pi_div_two_pos hb
  -- Choose some `c B : ℝ` satisfying `hB`, then choose `max c 0 < d < π / 2 / b`.
  rcases hB with ⟨c, hc, B, hO⟩
  

Proof state:
case intro.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro
E : Type u_1
inst✝¹ : NormedAddCommGroup E
inst✝ : NormedSpace ℂ E
C✝ : ℝ
f g : ℂ → E
z : ℂ
C : ℝ
hC₀ : 0 < C
a b : ℝ
hza : a - b < z.im
hle_a : ∀ (z : ℂ), z.im = a - b → ‖f z‖ ≤ C
hzb : z.im < a + b
hle_b : ∀ (z : ℂ), z.im = a + b → ‖f z‖ ≤ C
hfd : DiffContOnCl ℂ f (im ⁻¹' Ioo (a - b) (a + b))
hab : a - b < a + b
hb : 0 < b
hπb : 0 < π / 2 / b
c : ℝ
hc : c < π / 2 / b
B : ℝ
hO : f =O[comap (Abs.abs ∘ re) atTop ⊓ 𝓟 (im ⁻¹' Ioo (a - b) (a + b))] fun z => expR (B * expR (c * |z.re|))
⊢ ‖f z‖ ≤ C

Next tactic:
obtain ⟨d, ⟨hcd, hd₀⟩, hd⟩ : ∃ d, (c < d ∧ 0 < d) ∧ d < π / 2 / b := by
    simpa only [max_lt_iff] using exists_between (max_lt hc hπb)
/-- **Phragmen-Lindelöf principle** in a strip `U = {z : ℂ | a < im z < b}`.
Let `f : ℂ → E` be a function such that

* `f` is differentiable on `U` and is continuous on its closure;
* `‖f z‖` is bounded from above by `A * exp(B * exp(c * |re z|))` on `U` for some `c < π / (b - a)`;
* `‖f z‖` is bounded from above by a constant `C` on the boundary of `U`.

Then `‖f z‖` is bounded by the same constant on the closed strip
`{z : ℂ | a ≤ im z ≤ b}`. Moreover, it suffices to verify the second assumption
only for sufficiently large values of `|re z|`.
-/
theorem horizontal_strip (hfd : DiffContOnCl ℂ f (im ⁻¹' Ioo a b))
    (hB : ∃ c < π / (b - a), ∃ B,
      f =O[comap (Abs.abs ∘ re) atTop ⊓ 𝓟 (im ⁻¹' Ioo a b)] fun z ↦ expR (B * expR (c * |z.re|)))
    (hle_a : ∀ z : ℂ, im z = a → ‖f z‖ ≤ C) (hle_b : ∀ z, im z = b → ‖f z‖ ≤ C) (hza : a ≤ im z)
    (hzb : im z ≤ b) : ‖f z‖ ≤ C := by
  -- If `im z = a` or `im z = b`, then we apply `hle_a` or `hle_b`, otherwise `im z ∈ Ioo a b`.
  rw [le_iff_eq_or_lt] at hza hzb
  cases' hza with hza hza; · exact hle_a _ hza.symm
  cases' hzb with hzb hzb; · exact hle_b _ hzb
  wlog hC₀ : 0 < C generalizing C
  · refine' le_of_forall_le_of_dense fun C' hC' => this (fun w hw => _) (fun w hw => _) _
    · exact (hle_a _ hw).trans hC'.le
    · exact (hle_b _ hw).trans hC'.le
    · refine' ((norm_nonneg (f (a * I))).trans (hle_a _ _)).trans_lt hC'
      rw [mul_I_im, ofReal_re]
  -- After a change of variables, we deal with the strip `a - b < im z < a + b` instead
  -- of `a < im z < b`
  obtain ⟨a, b, rfl, rfl⟩ : ∃ a' b', a = a' - b' ∧ b = a' + b' :=
    ⟨(a + b) / 2, (b - a) / 2, by ring, by ring⟩
  have hab : a - b < a + b := hza.trans hzb
  have hb : 0 < b := by simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg, add_lt_add_iff_left, neg_lt_self_iff] using hab
  rw [add_sub_sub_cancel, ← two_mul, div_mul_eq_div_div] at hB
  have hπb : 0 < π / 2 / b := div_pos Real.pi_div_two_pos hb
  -- Choose some `c B : ℝ` satisfying `hB`, then choose `max c 0 < d < π / 2 / b`.
  rcases hB with ⟨c, hc, B, hO⟩
  obtain ⟨d, ⟨hcd, hd₀⟩, hd⟩ : ∃ d, (c < d ∧ 0 < d) ∧ d < π / 2 / b := by
    

Proof state:
E : Type u_1
inst✝¹ : NormedAddCommGroup E
inst✝ : NormedSpace ℂ E
C✝ : ℝ
f g : ℂ → E
z : ℂ
C : ℝ
hC₀ : 0 < C
a b : ℝ
hza : a - b < z.im
hle_a : ∀ (z : ℂ), z.im = a - b → ‖f z‖ ≤ C
hzb : z.im < a + b
hle_b : ∀ (z : ℂ), z.im = a + b → ‖f z‖ ≤ C
hfd : DiffContOnCl ℂ f (im ⁻¹' Ioo (a - b) (a + b))
hab : a - b < a + b
hb : 0 < b
hπb : 0 < π / 2 / b
c : ℝ
hc : c < π / 2 / b
B : ℝ
hO : f =O[comap (Abs.abs ∘ re) atTop ⊓ 𝓟 (im ⁻¹' Ioo (a - b) (a + b))] fun z => expR (B * expR (c * |z.re|))
⊢ ∃ d, (c < d ∧ 0 < d) ∧ d < π / 2 / b

Next tactic:
simpa only [max_lt_iff] using exists_between (max_lt hc hπb)
/-- **Phragmen-Lindelöf principle** in a strip `U = {z : ℂ | a < im z < b}`.
Let `f : ℂ → E` be a function such that

* `f` is differentiable on `U` and is continuous on its closure;
* `‖f z‖` is bounded from above by `A * exp(B * exp(c * |re z|))` on `U` for some `c < π / (b - a)`;
* `‖f z‖` is bounded from above by a constant `C` on the boundary of `U`.

Then `‖f z‖` is bounded by the same constant on the closed strip
`{z : ℂ | a ≤ im z ≤ b}`. Moreover, it suffices to verify the second assumption
only for sufficiently large values of `|re z|`.
-/
theorem horizontal_strip (hfd : DiffContOnCl ℂ f (im ⁻¹' Ioo a b))
    (hB : ∃ c < π / (b - a), ∃ B,
      f =O[comap (Abs.abs ∘ re) atTop ⊓ 𝓟 (im ⁻¹' Ioo a b)] fun z ↦ expR (B * expR (c * |z.re|)))
    (hle_a : ∀ z : ℂ, im z = a → ‖f z‖ ≤ C) (hle_b : ∀ z, im z = b → ‖f z‖ ≤ C) (hza : a ≤ im z)
    (hzb : im z ≤ b) : ‖f z‖ ≤ C := by
  -- If `im z = a` or `im z = b`, then we apply `hle_a` or `hle_b`, otherwise `im z ∈ Ioo a b`.
  rw [le_iff_eq_or_lt] at hza hzb
  cases' hza with hza hza; · exact hle_a _ hza.symm
  cases' hzb with hzb hzb; · exact hle_b _ hzb
  wlog hC₀ : 0 < C generalizing C
  · refine' le_of_forall_le_of_dense fun C' hC' => this (fun w hw => _) (fun w hw => _) _
    · exact (hle_a _ hw).trans hC'.le
    · exact (hle_b _ hw).trans hC'.le
    · refine' ((norm_nonneg (f (a * I))).trans (hle_a _ _)).trans_lt hC'
      rw [mul_I_im, ofReal_re]
  -- After a change of variables, we deal with the strip `a - b < im z < a + b` instead
  -- of `a < im z < b`
  obtain ⟨a, b, rfl, rfl⟩ : ∃ a' b', a = a' - b' ∧ b = a' + b' :=
    ⟨(a + b) / 2, (b - a) / 2, by ring, by ring⟩
  have hab : a - b < a + b := hza.trans hzb
  have hb : 0 < b := by simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg, add_lt_add_iff_left, neg_lt_self_iff] using hab
  rw [add_sub_sub_cancel, ← two_mul, div_mul_eq_div_div] at hB
  have hπb : 0 < π / 2 / b := div_pos Real.pi_div_two_pos hb
  -- Choose some `c B : ℝ` satisfying `hB`, then choose `max c 0 < d < π / 2 / b`.
  rcases hB with ⟨c, hc, B, hO⟩
  obtain ⟨d, ⟨hcd, hd₀⟩, hd⟩ : ∃ d, (c < d ∧ 0 < d) ∧ d < π / 2 / b := by
    simpa only [max_lt_iff] using exists_between (max_lt hc hπb)
  

Proof state:
case intro.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro
E : Type u_1
inst✝¹ : NormedAddCommGroup E
inst✝ : NormedSpace ℂ E
C✝ : ℝ
f g : ℂ → E
z : ℂ
C : ℝ
hC₀ : 0 < C
a b : ℝ
hza : a - b < z.im
hle_a : ∀ (z : ℂ), z.im = a - b → ‖f z‖ ≤ C
hzb : z.im < a + b
hle_b : ∀ (z : ℂ), z.im = a + b → ‖f z‖ ≤ C
hfd : DiffContOnCl ℂ f (im ⁻¹' Ioo (a - b) (a + b))
hab : a - b < a + b
hb : 0 < b
hπb : 0 < π / 2 / b
c : ℝ
hc : c < π / 2 / b
B : ℝ
hO : f =O[comap (Abs.abs ∘ re) atTop ⊓ 𝓟 (im ⁻¹' Ioo (a - b) (a + b))] fun z => expR (B * expR (c * |z.re|))
d : ℝ
hd : d < π / 2 / b
hcd : c < d
hd₀ : 0 < d
⊢ ‖f z‖ ≤ C

Next tactic:
have hb' : d * b < π / 2 := (lt_div_iff hb).1 hd
/-- **Phragmen-Lindelöf principle** in a strip `U = {z : ℂ | a < im z < b}`.
Let `f : ℂ → E` be a function such that

* `f` is differentiable on `U` and is continuous on its closure;
* `‖f z‖` is bounded from above by `A * exp(B * exp(c * |re z|))` on `U` for some `c < π / (b - a)`;
* `‖f z‖` is bounded from above by a constant `C` on the boundary of `U`.

Then `‖f z‖` is bounded by the same constant on the closed strip
`{z : ℂ | a ≤ im z ≤ b}`. Moreover, it suffices to verify the second assumption
only for sufficiently large values of `|re z|`.
-/
theorem horizontal_strip (hfd : DiffContOnCl ℂ f (im ⁻¹' Ioo a b))
    (hB : ∃ c < π / (b - a), ∃ B,
      f =O[comap (Abs.abs ∘ re) atTop ⊓ 𝓟 (im ⁻¹' Ioo a b)] fun z ↦ expR (B * expR (c * |z.re|)))
    (hle_a : ∀ z : ℂ, im z = a → ‖f z‖ ≤ C) (hle_b : ∀ z, im z = b → ‖f z‖ ≤ C) (hza : a ≤ im z)
    (hzb : im z ≤ b) : ‖f z‖ ≤ C := by
  -- If `im z = a` or `im z = b`, then we apply `hle_a` or `hle_b`, otherwise `im z ∈ Ioo a b`.
  rw [le_iff_eq_or_lt] at hza hzb
  cases' hza with hza hza; · exact hle_a _ hza.symm
  cases' hzb with hzb hzb; · exact hle_b _ hzb
  wlog hC₀ : 0 < C generalizing C
  · refine' le_of_forall_le_of_dense fun C' hC' => this (fun w hw => _) (fun w hw => _) _
    · exact (hle_a _ hw).trans hC'.le
    · exact (hle_b _ hw).trans hC'.le
    · refine' ((norm_nonneg (f (a * I))).trans (hle_a _ _)).trans_lt hC'
      rw [mul_I_im, ofReal_re]
  -- After a change of variables, we deal with the strip `a - b < im z < a + b` instead
  -- of `a < im z < b`
  obtain ⟨a, b, rfl, rfl⟩ : ∃ a' b', a = a' - b' ∧ b = a' + b' :=
    ⟨(a + b) / 2, (b - a) / 2, by ring, by ring⟩
  have hab : a - b < a + b := hza.trans hzb
  have hb : 0 < b := by simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg, add_lt_add_iff_left, neg_lt_self_iff] using hab
  rw [add_sub_sub_cancel, ← two_mul, div_mul_eq_div_div] at hB
  have hπb : 0 < π / 2 / b := div_pos Real.pi_div_two_pos hb
  -- Choose some `c B : ℝ` satisfying `hB`, then choose `max c 0 < d < π / 2 / b`.
  rcases hB with ⟨c, hc, B, hO⟩
  obtain ⟨d, ⟨hcd, hd₀⟩, hd⟩ : ∃ d, (c < d ∧ 0 < d) ∧ d < π / 2 / b := by
    simpa only [max_lt_iff] using exists_between (max_lt hc hπb)
  have hb' : d * b < π / 2 := (lt_div_iff hb).1 hd
  

Proof state:
case intro.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro
E : Type u_1
inst✝¹ : NormedAddCommGroup E
inst✝ : NormedSpace ℂ E
C✝ : ℝ
f g : ℂ → E
z : ℂ
C : ℝ
hC₀ : 0 < C
a b : ℝ
hza : a - b < z.im
hle_a : ∀ (z : ℂ), z.im = a - b → ‖f z‖ ≤ C
hzb : z.im < a + b
hle_b : ∀ (z : ℂ), z.im = a + b → ‖f z‖ ≤ C
hfd : DiffContOnCl ℂ f (im ⁻¹' Ioo (a - b) (a + b))
hab : a - b < a + b
hb : 0 < b
hπb : 0 < π / 2 / b
c : ℝ
hc : c < π / 2 / b
B : ℝ
hO : f =O[comap (Abs.abs ∘ re) atTop ⊓ 𝓟 (im ⁻¹' Ioo (a - b) (a + b))] fun z => expR (B * expR (c * |z.re|))
d : ℝ
hd : d < π / 2 / b
hcd : c < d
hd₀ : 0 < d
hb' : d * b < π / 2
⊢ ‖f z‖ ≤ C

Next tactic:
set aff := (fun w => d * (w - a * I) : ℂ → ℂ)
/-- **Phragmen-Lindelöf principle** in a strip `U = {z : ℂ | a < im z < b}`.
Let `f : ℂ → E` be a function such that

* `f` is differentiable on `U` and is continuous on its closure;
* `‖f z‖` is bounded from above by `A * exp(B * exp(c * |re z|))` on `U` for some `c < π / (b - a)`;
* `‖f z‖` is bounded from above by a constant `C` on the boundary of `U`.

Then `‖f z‖` is bounded by the same constant on the closed strip
`{z : ℂ | a ≤ im z ≤ b}`. Moreover, it suffices to verify the second assumption
only for sufficiently large values of `|re z|`.
-/
theorem horizontal_strip (hfd : DiffContOnCl ℂ f (im ⁻¹' Ioo a b))
    (hB : ∃ c < π / (b - a), ∃ B,
      f =O[comap (Abs.abs ∘ re) atTop ⊓ 𝓟 (im ⁻¹' Ioo a b)] fun z ↦ expR (B * expR (c * |z.re|)))
    (hle_a : ∀ z : ℂ, im z = a → ‖f z‖ ≤ C) (hle_b : ∀ z, im z = b → ‖f z‖ ≤ C) (hza : a ≤ im z)
    (hzb : im z ≤ b) : ‖f z‖ ≤ C := by
  -- If `im z = a` or `im z = b`, then we apply `hle_a` or `hle_b`, otherwise `im z ∈ Ioo a b`.
  rw [le_iff_eq_or_lt] at hza hzb
  cases' hza with hza hza; · exact hle_a _ hza.symm
  cases' hzb with hzb hzb; · exact hle_b _ hzb
  wlog hC₀ : 0 < C generalizing C
  · refine' le_of_forall_le_of_dense fun C' hC' => this (fun w hw => _) (fun w hw => _) _
    · exact (hle_a _ hw).trans hC'.le
    · exact (hle_b _ hw).trans hC'.le
    · refine' ((norm_nonneg (f (a * I))).trans (hle_a _ _)).trans_lt hC'
      rw [mul_I_im, ofReal_re]
  -- After a change of variables, we deal with the strip `a - b < im z < a + b` instead
  -- of `a < im z < b`
  obtain ⟨a, b, rfl, rfl⟩ : ∃ a' b', a = a' - b' ∧ b = a' + b' :=
    ⟨(a + b) / 2, (b - a) / 2, by ring, by ring⟩
  have hab : a - b < a + b := hza.trans hzb
  have hb : 0 < b := by simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg, add_lt_add_iff_left, neg_lt_self_iff] using hab
  rw [add_sub_sub_cancel, ← two_mul, div_mul_eq_div_div] at hB
  have hπb : 0 < π / 2 / b := div_pos Real.pi_div_two_pos hb
  -- Choose some `c B : ℝ` satisfying `hB`, then choose `max c 0 < d < π / 2 / b`.
  rcases hB with ⟨c, hc, B, hO⟩
  obtain ⟨d, ⟨hcd, hd₀⟩, hd⟩ : ∃ d, (c < d ∧ 0 < d) ∧ d < π / 2 / b := by
    simpa only [max_lt_iff] using exists_between (max_lt hc hπb)
  have hb' : d * b < π / 2 := (lt_div_iff hb).1 hd
  set aff := (fun w => d * (w - a * I) : ℂ → ℂ)
  

Proof state:
case intro.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro
E : Type u_1
inst✝¹ : NormedAddCommGroup E
inst✝ : NormedSpace ℂ E
C✝ : ℝ
f g : ℂ → E
z : ℂ
C : ℝ
hC₀ : 0 < C
a b : ℝ
hza : a - b < z.im
hle_a : ∀ (z : ℂ), z.im = a - b → ‖f z‖ ≤ C
hzb : z.im < a + b
hle_b : ∀ (z : ℂ), z.im = a + b → ‖f z‖ ≤ C
hfd : DiffContOnCl ℂ f (im ⁻¹' Ioo (a - b) (a + b))
hab : a - b < a + b
hb : 0 < b
hπb : 0 < π / 2 / b
c : ℝ
hc : c < π / 2 / b
B : ℝ
hO : f =O[comap (Abs.abs ∘ re) atTop ⊓ 𝓟 (im ⁻¹' Ioo (a - b) (a + b))] fun z => expR (B * expR (c * |z.re|))
d : ℝ
hd : d < π / 2 / b
hcd : c < d
hd₀ : 0 < d
hb' : d * b < π / 2
aff : ℂ → ℂ := fun w => ↑d * (w - ↑a * I)
⊢ ‖f z‖ ≤ C

Next tactic:
set g := fun (ε : ℝ) (w : ℂ) => exp (ε * (exp (aff w) + exp (-aff w)))
/-- **Phragmen-Lindelöf principle** in a strip `U = {z : ℂ | a < re z < b}`.
Let `f : ℂ → E` be a function such that

* `f` is differentiable on `U` and is continuous on its closure;
* `‖f z‖` is bounded from above by `A * exp(B * exp(c * |im z|))` on `U` for some `c < π / (b - a)`;
* `‖f z‖` is bounded from above by a constant `C` on the boundary of `U`.

Then `‖f z‖` is bounded by the same constant on the closed strip
`{z : ℂ | a ≤ re z ≤ b}`. Moreover, it suffices to verify the second assumption
only for sufficiently large values of `|im z|`.
-/
theorem vertical_strip (hfd : DiffContOnCl ℂ f (re ⁻¹' Ioo a b))
    (hB : ∃ c < π / (b - a), ∃ B,
      f =O[comap (Abs.abs ∘ im) atTop ⊓ 𝓟 (re ⁻¹' Ioo a b)] fun z ↦ expR (B * expR (c * |z.im|)))
    (hle_a : ∀ z : ℂ, re z = a → ‖f z‖ ≤ C) (hle_b : ∀ z, re z = b → ‖f z‖ ≤ C) (hza : a ≤ re z)
    (hzb : re z ≤ b) : ‖f z‖ ≤ C := by
  

Proof state:
E : Type u_1
inst✝¹ : NormedAddCommGroup E
inst✝ : NormedSpace ℂ E
a b C : ℝ
f g : ℂ → E
z : ℂ
hfd : DiffContOnCl ℂ f (re ⁻¹' Ioo a b)
hB : ∃ c < π / (b - a), ∃ B, f =O[comap (Abs.abs ∘ im) atTop ⊓ 𝓟 (re ⁻¹' Ioo a b)] fun z => expR (B * expR (c * |z.im|))
hle_a : ∀ (z : ℂ), z.re = a → ‖f z‖ ≤ C
hle_b : ∀ (z : ℂ), z.re = b → ‖f z‖ ≤ C
hza : a ≤ z.re
hzb : z.re ≤ b
⊢ ‖f z‖ ≤ C

Next tactic:
suffices ‖f (z * I * -I)‖ ≤ C by simpa [mul_assoc] using this
/-- **Phragmen-Lindelöf principle** in a strip `U = {z : ℂ | a < re z < b}`.
Let `f : ℂ → E` be a function such that

* `f` is differentiable on `U` and is continuous on its closure;
* `‖f z‖` is bounded from above by `A * exp(B * exp(c * |im z|))` on `U` for some `c < π / (b - a)`;
* `‖f z‖` is bounded from above by a constant `C` on the boundary of `U`.

Then `‖f z‖` is bounded by the same constant on the closed strip
`{z : ℂ | a ≤ re z ≤ b}`. Moreover, it suffices to verify the second assumption
only for sufficiently large values of `|im z|`.
-/
theorem vertical_strip (hfd : DiffContOnCl ℂ f (re ⁻¹' Ioo a b))
    (hB : ∃ c < π / (b - a), ∃ B,
      f =O[comap (Abs.abs ∘ im) atTop ⊓ 𝓟 (re ⁻¹' Ioo a b)] fun z ↦ expR (B * expR (c * |z.im|)))
    (hle_a : ∀ z : ℂ, re z = a → ‖f z‖ ≤ C) (hle_b : ∀ z, re z = b → ‖f z‖ ≤ C) (hza : a ≤ re z)
    (hzb : re z ≤ b) : ‖f z‖ ≤ C := by
  suffices ‖f (z * I * -I)‖ ≤ C by 

Proof state:
E : Type u_1
inst✝¹ : NormedAddCommGroup E
inst✝ : NormedSpace ℂ E
a b C : ℝ
f g : ℂ → E
z : ℂ
hfd : DiffContOnCl ℂ f (re ⁻¹' Ioo a b)
hB : ∃ c < π / (b - a), ∃ B, f =O[comap (Abs.abs ∘ im) atTop ⊓ 𝓟 (re ⁻¹' Ioo a b)] fun z => expR (B * expR (c * |z.im|))
hle_a : ∀ (z : ℂ), z.re = a → ‖f z‖ ≤ C
hle_b : ∀ (z : ℂ), z.re = b → ‖f z‖ ≤ C
hza : a ≤ z.re
hzb : z.re ≤ b
this : ‖f (z * I * -I)‖ ≤ C
⊢ ‖f z‖ ≤ C

Next tactic:
simpa [mul_assoc] using this
/-- **Phragmen-Lindelöf principle** in a strip `U = {z : ℂ | a < re z < b}`.
Let `f : ℂ → E` be a function such that

* `f` is differentiable on `U` and is continuous on its closure;
* `‖f z‖` is bounded from above by `A * exp(B * exp(c * |im z|))` on `U` for some `c < π / (b - a)`;
* `‖f z‖` is bounded from above by a constant `C` on the boundary of `U`.

Then `‖f z‖` is bounded by the same constant on the closed strip
`{z : ℂ | a ≤ re z ≤ b}`. Moreover, it suffices to verify the second assumption
only for sufficiently large values of `|im z|`.
-/
theorem vertical_strip (hfd : DiffContOnCl ℂ f (re ⁻¹' Ioo a b))
    (hB : ∃ c < π / (b - a), ∃ B,
      f =O[comap (Abs.abs ∘ im) atTop ⊓ 𝓟 (re ⁻¹' Ioo a b)] fun z ↦ expR (B * expR (c * |z.im|)))
    (hle_a : ∀ z : ℂ, re z = a → ‖f z‖ ≤ C) (hle_b : ∀ z, re z = b → ‖f z‖ ≤ C) (hza : a ≤ re z)
    (hzb : re z ≤ b) : ‖f z‖ ≤ C := by
  suffices ‖f (z * I * -I)‖ ≤ C by simpa [mul_assoc] using this
  

Proof state:
E : Type u_1
inst✝¹ : NormedAddCommGroup E
inst✝ : NormedSpace ℂ E
a b C : ℝ
f g : ℂ → E
z : ℂ
hfd : DiffContOnCl ℂ f (re ⁻¹' Ioo a b)
hB : ∃ c < π / (b - a), ∃ B, f =O[comap (Abs.abs ∘ im) atTop ⊓ 𝓟 (re ⁻¹' Ioo a b)] fun z => expR (B * expR (c * |z.im|))
hle_a : ∀ (z : ℂ), z.re = a → ‖f z‖ ≤ C
hle_b : ∀ (z : ℂ), z.re = b → ‖f z‖ ≤ C
hza : a ≤ z.re
hzb : z.re ≤ b
⊢ ‖f (z * I * -I)‖ ≤ C

Next tactic:
have H : MapsTo (· * -I) (im ⁻¹' Ioo a b) (re ⁻¹' Ioo a b) := fun z hz ↦ by simpa using hz
/-- **Phragmen-Lindelöf principle** in a strip `U = {z : ℂ | a < re z < b}`.
Let `f : ℂ → E` be a function such that

* `f` is differentiable on `U` and is continuous on its closure;
* `‖f z‖` is bounded from above by `A * exp(B * exp(c * |im z|))` on `U` for some `c < π / (b - a)`;
* `‖f z‖` is bounded from above by a constant `C` on the boundary of `U`.

Then `‖f z‖` is bounded by the same constant on the closed strip
`{z : ℂ | a ≤ re z ≤ b}`. Moreover, it suffices to verify the second assumption
only for sufficiently large values of `|im z|`.
-/
theorem vertical_strip (hfd : DiffContOnCl ℂ f (re ⁻¹' Ioo a b))
    (hB : ∃ c < π / (b - a), ∃ B,
      f =O[comap (Abs.abs ∘ im) atTop ⊓ 𝓟 (re ⁻¹' Ioo a b)] fun z ↦ expR (B * expR (c * |z.im|)))
    (hle_a : ∀ z : ℂ, re z = a → ‖f z‖ ≤ C) (hle_b : ∀ z, re z = b → ‖f z‖ ≤ C) (hza : a ≤ re z)
    (hzb : re z ≤ b) : ‖f z‖ ≤ C := by
  suffices ‖f (z * I * -I)‖ ≤ C by simpa [mul_assoc] using this
  have H : MapsTo (· * -I) (im ⁻¹' Ioo a b) (re ⁻¹' Ioo a b) := fun z hz ↦ by 

Proof state:
E : Type u_1
inst✝¹ : NormedAddCommGroup E
inst✝ : NormedSpace ℂ E
a b C : ℝ
f g : ℂ → E
z✝ : ℂ
hfd : DiffContOnCl ℂ f (re ⁻¹' Ioo a b)
hB : ∃ c < π / (b - a), ∃ B, f =O[comap (Abs.abs ∘ im) atTop ⊓ 𝓟 (re ⁻¹' Ioo a b)] fun z => expR (B * expR (c * |z.im|))
hle_a : ∀ (z : ℂ), z.re = a → ‖f z‖ ≤ C
hle_b : ∀ (z : ℂ), z.re = b → ‖f z‖ ≤ C
hza : a ≤ z✝.re
hzb : z✝.re ≤ b
z : ℂ
hz : z ∈ im ⁻¹' Ioo a b
⊢ (fun x => x * -I) z ∈ re ⁻¹' Ioo a b

Next tactic:
simpa using hz
/-- **Phragmen-Lindelöf principle** in a strip `U = {z : ℂ | a < re z < b}`.
Let `f : ℂ → E` be a function such that

* `f` is differentiable on `U` and is continuous on its closure;
* `‖f z‖` is bounded from above by `A * exp(B * exp(c * |im z|))` on `U` for some `c < π / (b - a)`;
* `‖f z‖` is bounded from above by a constant `C` on the boundary of `U`.

Then `‖f z‖` is bounded by the same constant on the closed strip
`{z : ℂ | a ≤ re z ≤ b}`. Moreover, it suffices to verify the second assumption
only for sufficiently large values of `|im z|`.
-/
theorem vertical_strip (hfd : DiffContOnCl ℂ f (re ⁻¹' Ioo a b))
    (hB : ∃ c < π / (b - a), ∃ B,
      f =O[comap (Abs.abs ∘ im) atTop ⊓ 𝓟 (re ⁻¹' Ioo a b)] fun z ↦ expR (B * expR (c * |z.im|)))
    (hle_a : ∀ z : ℂ, re z = a → ‖f z‖ ≤ C) (hle_b : ∀ z, re z = b → ‖f z‖ ≤ C) (hza : a ≤ re z)
    (hzb : re z ≤ b) : ‖f z‖ ≤ C := by
  suffices ‖f (z * I * -I)‖ ≤ C by simpa [mul_assoc] using this
  have H : MapsTo (· * -I) (im ⁻¹' Ioo a b) (re ⁻¹' Ioo a b) := fun z hz ↦ by simpa using hz
  

Proof state:
E : Type u_1
inst✝¹ : NormedAddCommGroup E
inst✝ : NormedSpace ℂ E
a b C : ℝ
f g : ℂ → E
z : ℂ
hfd : DiffContOnCl ℂ f (re ⁻¹' Ioo a b)
hB : ∃ c < π / (b - a), ∃ B, f =O[comap (Abs.abs ∘ im) atTop ⊓ 𝓟 (re ⁻¹' Ioo a b)] fun z => expR (B * expR (c * |z.im|))
hle_a : ∀ (z : ℂ), z.re = a → ‖f z‖ ≤ C
hle_b : ∀ (z : ℂ), z.re = b → ‖f z‖ ≤ C
hza : a ≤ z.re
hzb : z.re ≤ b
H : MapsTo (fun x => x * -I) (im ⁻¹' Ioo a b) (re ⁻¹' Ioo a b)
⊢ ‖f (z * I * -I)‖ ≤ C

Next tactic:
refine' horizontal_strip (f := fun z ↦ f (z * -I))
    (hfd.comp (differentiable_id.mul_const _).diffContOnCl H) _ (fun z hz => hle_a _ _)
    (fun z hz => hle_b _ _) _ _