l3lab/ntp-mathlib huggingface dataset:
theorem str_eq_of_le_nhds {X : Compactum} (F : Ultrafilter X) (x : X) : ↑F ≤ 𝓝 x → X.str F = x := by
  -- Notation to be used in this proof.
  let fsu := Finset (Set (Ultrafilter X))
  let ssu := Set (Set (Ultrafilter X))
  let ι : fsu → ssu := fun x ↦ ↑x
  let T0 : ssu := { S | ∃ A ∈ F, S = basic A }
  let AA := X.str ⁻¹' {x}
  let T1 := insert AA T0
  let T2 := finiteInterClosure T1
  intro cond
  -- If F contains a closed set A, then x is contained in A.
  have claim1 : ∀ A : Set X, IsClosed A → A ∈ F → x ∈ A := by
    intro A hA h
    by_contra H
    rw [le_nhds_iff] at cond
    specialize cond Aᶜ H hA.isOpen_compl
    rw [Ultrafilter.mem_coe, Ultrafilter.compl_mem_iff_not_mem] at cond
    contradiction
  -- If A ∈ F, then x ∈ cl A.
  have claim2 : ∀ A : Set X, A ∈ F → x ∈ cl A := by
    intro A hA
    exact claim1 (cl A) (isClosed_cl A) (mem_of_superset hA (subset_cl A))
  -- T0 is closed under intersections.
  have claim3 : ∀ (S1) (_ : S1 ∈ T0) (S2) (_ : S2 ∈ T0), S1 ∩ S2 ∈ T0 := by
    rintro S1 ⟨S1, hS1, rfl⟩ S2 ⟨S2, hS2, rfl⟩
    exact ⟨S1 ∩ S2, inter_mem hS1 hS2, by simp [basic_inter]⟩
  -- For every S ∈ T0, the intersection AA ∩ S is nonempty.
  have claim4 : ∀ S ∈ T0, (AA ∩ S).Nonempty := by
    rintro S ⟨S, hS, rfl⟩
    rcases claim2 _ hS with ⟨G, hG, hG2⟩
    exact ⟨G, hG2, hG⟩
  -- Every element of T0 is nonempty.
  have claim5 : ∀ S ∈ T0, Set.Nonempty S := by
    rintro S ⟨S, hS, rfl⟩
    exact ⟨F, hS⟩
  -- Every element of T2 is nonempty.
  have claim6 : ∀ S ∈ T2, Set.Nonempty S := by
    suffices ∀ S ∈ T2, S ∈ T0 ∨ ∃ Q ∈ T0, S = AA ∩ Q by
      intro S hS
      cases' this _ hS with h h
      · exact claim5 S h
      · rcases h with ⟨Q, hQ, rfl⟩
        exact claim4 Q hQ
    intro S hS
    apply finiteInterClosure_insert
    · constructor
      · use Set.univ
        refine' ⟨Filter.univ_sets _, _⟩
        ext
        refine' ⟨_, by 

Proof state:
X : Compactum
F : Ultrafilter X.A
x : X.A
fsu : Type u_1 := Finset (Set (Ultrafilter X.A))
ssu : Type u_1 := Set (Set (Ultrafilter X.A))
ι : fsu → ssu := fun x => ↑x
T0 : ssu := {S | ∃ A ∈ F, S = Compactum.basic A}
AA : Set (Ultrafilter X.A) := str X ⁻¹' {x}
T1 : ssu := insert AA T0
T2 : Set (Set (Ultrafilter X.A)) := finiteInterClosure T1
cond : ↑F ≤ 𝓝 x
claim1 : ∀ (A : Set X.A), IsClosed A → A ∈ F → x ∈ A
claim2 : ∀ A ∈ F, x ∈ Compactum.cl A
claim3 : ∀ S1 ∈ T0, ∀ S2 ∈ T0, S1 ∩ S2 ∈ T0
claim4 : ∀ S ∈ T0, Set.Nonempty (AA ∩ S)
claim5 : ∀ S ∈ T0, Set.Nonempty S
S : Set (Ultrafilter X.A)
hS : S ∈ T2
x✝ : Ultrafilter X.A
⊢ x✝ ∈ Compactum.basic Set.univ → x✝ ∈ Set.univ

Next tactic:
tauto
theorem str_eq_of_le_nhds {X : Compactum} (F : Ultrafilter X) (x : X) : ↑F ≤ 𝓝 x → X.str F = x := by
  -- Notation to be used in this proof.
  let fsu := Finset (Set (Ultrafilter X))
  let ssu := Set (Set (Ultrafilter X))
  let ι : fsu → ssu := fun x ↦ ↑x
  let T0 : ssu := { S | ∃ A ∈ F, S = basic A }
  let AA := X.str ⁻¹' {x}
  let T1 := insert AA T0
  let T2 := finiteInterClosure T1
  intro cond
  -- If F contains a closed set A, then x is contained in A.
  have claim1 : ∀ A : Set X, IsClosed A → A ∈ F → x ∈ A := by
    intro A hA h
    by_contra H
    rw [le_nhds_iff] at cond
    specialize cond Aᶜ H hA.isOpen_compl
    rw [Ultrafilter.mem_coe, Ultrafilter.compl_mem_iff_not_mem] at cond
    contradiction
  -- If A ∈ F, then x ∈ cl A.
  have claim2 : ∀ A : Set X, A ∈ F → x ∈ cl A := by
    intro A hA
    exact claim1 (cl A) (isClosed_cl A) (mem_of_superset hA (subset_cl A))
  -- T0 is closed under intersections.
  have claim3 : ∀ (S1) (_ : S1 ∈ T0) (S2) (_ : S2 ∈ T0), S1 ∩ S2 ∈ T0 := by
    rintro S1 ⟨S1, hS1, rfl⟩ S2 ⟨S2, hS2, rfl⟩
    exact ⟨S1 ∩ S2, inter_mem hS1 hS2, by simp [basic_inter]⟩
  -- For every S ∈ T0, the intersection AA ∩ S is nonempty.
  have claim4 : ∀ S ∈ T0, (AA ∩ S).Nonempty := by
    rintro S ⟨S, hS, rfl⟩
    rcases claim2 _ hS with ⟨G, hG, hG2⟩
    exact ⟨G, hG2, hG⟩
  -- Every element of T0 is nonempty.
  have claim5 : ∀ S ∈ T0, Set.Nonempty S := by
    rintro S ⟨S, hS, rfl⟩
    exact ⟨F, hS⟩
  -- Every element of T2 is nonempty.
  have claim6 : ∀ S ∈ T2, Set.Nonempty S := by
    suffices ∀ S ∈ T2, S ∈ T0 ∨ ∃ Q ∈ T0, S = AA ∩ Q by
      intro S hS
      cases' this _ hS with h h
      · exact claim5 S h
      · rcases h with ⟨Q, hQ, rfl⟩
        exact claim4 Q hQ
    intro S hS
    apply finiteInterClosure_insert
    · constructor
      · use Set.univ
        refine' ⟨Filter.univ_sets _, _⟩
        ext
        refine' ⟨_, by tauto⟩
        · 

Proof state:
case h.h
X : Compactum
F : Ultrafilter X.A
x : X.A
fsu : Type u_1 := Finset (Set (Ultrafilter X.A))
ssu : Type u_1 := Set (Set (Ultrafilter X.A))
ι : fsu → ssu := fun x => ↑x
T0 : ssu := {S | ∃ A ∈ F, S = Compactum.basic A}
AA : Set (Ultrafilter X.A) := str X ⁻¹' {x}
T1 : ssu := insert AA T0
T2 : Set (Set (Ultrafilter X.A)) := finiteInterClosure T1
cond : ↑F ≤ 𝓝 x
claim1 : ∀ (A : Set X.A), IsClosed A → A ∈ F → x ∈ A
claim2 : ∀ A ∈ F, x ∈ Compactum.cl A
claim3 : ∀ S1 ∈ T0, ∀ S2 ∈ T0, S1 ∩ S2 ∈ T0
claim4 : ∀ S ∈ T0, Set.Nonempty (AA ∩ S)
claim5 : ∀ S ∈ T0, Set.Nonempty S
S : Set (Ultrafilter X.A)
hS : S ∈ T2
x✝ : Ultrafilter X.A
⊢ x✝ ∈ Set.univ → x✝ ∈ Compactum.basic Set.univ

Next tactic:
intro
theorem str_eq_of_le_nhds {X : Compactum} (F : Ultrafilter X) (x : X) : ↑F ≤ 𝓝 x → X.str F = x := by
  -- Notation to be used in this proof.
  let fsu := Finset (Set (Ultrafilter X))
  let ssu := Set (Set (Ultrafilter X))
  let ι : fsu → ssu := fun x ↦ ↑x
  let T0 : ssu := { S | ∃ A ∈ F, S = basic A }
  let AA := X.str ⁻¹' {x}
  let T1 := insert AA T0
  let T2 := finiteInterClosure T1
  intro cond
  -- If F contains a closed set A, then x is contained in A.
  have claim1 : ∀ A : Set X, IsClosed A → A ∈ F → x ∈ A := by
    intro A hA h
    by_contra H
    rw [le_nhds_iff] at cond
    specialize cond Aᶜ H hA.isOpen_compl
    rw [Ultrafilter.mem_coe, Ultrafilter.compl_mem_iff_not_mem] at cond
    contradiction
  -- If A ∈ F, then x ∈ cl A.
  have claim2 : ∀ A : Set X, A ∈ F → x ∈ cl A := by
    intro A hA
    exact claim1 (cl A) (isClosed_cl A) (mem_of_superset hA (subset_cl A))
  -- T0 is closed under intersections.
  have claim3 : ∀ (S1) (_ : S1 ∈ T0) (S2) (_ : S2 ∈ T0), S1 ∩ S2 ∈ T0 := by
    rintro S1 ⟨S1, hS1, rfl⟩ S2 ⟨S2, hS2, rfl⟩
    exact ⟨S1 ∩ S2, inter_mem hS1 hS2, by simp [basic_inter]⟩
  -- For every S ∈ T0, the intersection AA ∩ S is nonempty.
  have claim4 : ∀ S ∈ T0, (AA ∩ S).Nonempty := by
    rintro S ⟨S, hS, rfl⟩
    rcases claim2 _ hS with ⟨G, hG, hG2⟩
    exact ⟨G, hG2, hG⟩
  -- Every element of T0 is nonempty.
  have claim5 : ∀ S ∈ T0, Set.Nonempty S := by
    rintro S ⟨S, hS, rfl⟩
    exact ⟨F, hS⟩
  -- Every element of T2 is nonempty.
  have claim6 : ∀ S ∈ T2, Set.Nonempty S := by
    suffices ∀ S ∈ T2, S ∈ T0 ∨ ∃ Q ∈ T0, S = AA ∩ Q by
      intro S hS
      cases' this _ hS with h h
      · exact claim5 S h
      · rcases h with ⟨Q, hQ, rfl⟩
        exact claim4 Q hQ
    intro S hS
    apply finiteInterClosure_insert
    · constructor
      · use Set.univ
        refine' ⟨Filter.univ_sets _, _⟩
        ext
        refine' ⟨_, by tauto⟩
        · intro
          

Proof state:
case h.h
X : Compactum
F : Ultrafilter X.A
x : X.A
fsu : Type u_1 := Finset (Set (Ultrafilter X.A))
ssu : Type u_1 := Set (Set (Ultrafilter X.A))
ι : fsu → ssu := fun x => ↑x
T0 : ssu := {S | ∃ A ∈ F, S = Compactum.basic A}
AA : Set (Ultrafilter X.A) := str X ⁻¹' {x}
T1 : ssu := insert AA T0
T2 : Set (Set (Ultrafilter X.A)) := finiteInterClosure T1
cond : ↑F ≤ 𝓝 x
claim1 : ∀ (A : Set X.A), IsClosed A → A ∈ F → x ∈ A
claim2 : ∀ A ∈ F, x ∈ Compactum.cl A
claim3 : ∀ S1 ∈ T0, ∀ S2 ∈ T0, S1 ∩ S2 ∈ T0
claim4 : ∀ S ∈ T0, Set.Nonempty (AA ∩ S)
claim5 : ∀ S ∈ T0, Set.Nonempty S
S : Set (Ultrafilter X.A)
hS : S ∈ T2
x✝ : Ultrafilter X.A
a✝ : x✝ ∈ Set.univ
⊢ x✝ ∈ Compactum.basic Set.univ

Next tactic:
apply Filter.univ_sets
theorem str_eq_of_le_nhds {X : Compactum} (F : Ultrafilter X) (x : X) : ↑F ≤ 𝓝 x → X.str F = x := by
  -- Notation to be used in this proof.
  let fsu := Finset (Set (Ultrafilter X))
  let ssu := Set (Set (Ultrafilter X))
  let ι : fsu → ssu := fun x ↦ ↑x
  let T0 : ssu := { S | ∃ A ∈ F, S = basic A }
  let AA := X.str ⁻¹' {x}
  let T1 := insert AA T0
  let T2 := finiteInterClosure T1
  intro cond
  -- If F contains a closed set A, then x is contained in A.
  have claim1 : ∀ A : Set X, IsClosed A → A ∈ F → x ∈ A := by
    intro A hA h
    by_contra H
    rw [le_nhds_iff] at cond
    specialize cond Aᶜ H hA.isOpen_compl
    rw [Ultrafilter.mem_coe, Ultrafilter.compl_mem_iff_not_mem] at cond
    contradiction
  -- If A ∈ F, then x ∈ cl A.
  have claim2 : ∀ A : Set X, A ∈ F → x ∈ cl A := by
    intro A hA
    exact claim1 (cl A) (isClosed_cl A) (mem_of_superset hA (subset_cl A))
  -- T0 is closed under intersections.
  have claim3 : ∀ (S1) (_ : S1 ∈ T0) (S2) (_ : S2 ∈ T0), S1 ∩ S2 ∈ T0 := by
    rintro S1 ⟨S1, hS1, rfl⟩ S2 ⟨S2, hS2, rfl⟩
    exact ⟨S1 ∩ S2, inter_mem hS1 hS2, by simp [basic_inter]⟩
  -- For every S ∈ T0, the intersection AA ∩ S is nonempty.
  have claim4 : ∀ S ∈ T0, (AA ∩ S).Nonempty := by
    rintro S ⟨S, hS, rfl⟩
    rcases claim2 _ hS with ⟨G, hG, hG2⟩
    exact ⟨G, hG2, hG⟩
  -- Every element of T0 is nonempty.
  have claim5 : ∀ S ∈ T0, Set.Nonempty S := by
    rintro S ⟨S, hS, rfl⟩
    exact ⟨F, hS⟩
  -- Every element of T2 is nonempty.
  have claim6 : ∀ S ∈ T2, Set.Nonempty S := by
    suffices ∀ S ∈ T2, S ∈ T0 ∨ ∃ Q ∈ T0, S = AA ∩ Q by
      intro S hS
      cases' this _ hS with h h
      · exact claim5 S h
      · rcases h with ⟨Q, hQ, rfl⟩
        exact claim4 Q hQ
    intro S hS
    apply finiteInterClosure_insert
    · constructor
      · use Set.univ
        refine' ⟨Filter.univ_sets _, _⟩
        ext
        refine' ⟨_, by tauto⟩
        · intro
          apply Filter.univ_sets
      · 

Proof state:
case cond.inter_mem
X : Compactum
F : Ultrafilter X.A
x : X.A
fsu : Type u_1 := Finset (Set (Ultrafilter X.A))
ssu : Type u_1 := Set (Set (Ultrafilter X.A))
ι : fsu → ssu := fun x => ↑x
T0 : ssu := {S | ∃ A ∈ F, S = Compactum.basic A}
AA : Set (Ultrafilter X.A) := str X ⁻¹' {x}
T1 : ssu := insert AA T0
T2 : Set (Set (Ultrafilter X.A)) := finiteInterClosure T1
cond : ↑F ≤ 𝓝 x
claim1 : ∀ (A : Set X.A), IsClosed A → A ∈ F → x ∈ A
claim2 : ∀ A ∈ F, x ∈ Compactum.cl A
claim3 : ∀ S1 ∈ T0, ∀ S2 ∈ T0, S1 ∩ S2 ∈ T0
claim4 : ∀ S ∈ T0, Set.Nonempty (AA ∩ S)
claim5 : ∀ S ∈ T0, Set.Nonempty S
S : Set (Ultrafilter X.A)
hS : S ∈ T2
⊢ ∀ ⦃s : Set (Ultrafilter X.A)⦄, s ∈ T0 → ∀ ⦃t : Set (Ultrafilter X.A)⦄, t ∈ T0 → s ∩ t ∈ T0

Next tactic:
exact claim3
theorem str_eq_of_le_nhds {X : Compactum} (F : Ultrafilter X) (x : X) : ↑F ≤ 𝓝 x → X.str F = x := by
  -- Notation to be used in this proof.
  let fsu := Finset (Set (Ultrafilter X))
  let ssu := Set (Set (Ultrafilter X))
  let ι : fsu → ssu := fun x ↦ ↑x
  let T0 : ssu := { S | ∃ A ∈ F, S = basic A }
  let AA := X.str ⁻¹' {x}
  let T1 := insert AA T0
  let T2 := finiteInterClosure T1
  intro cond
  -- If F contains a closed set A, then x is contained in A.
  have claim1 : ∀ A : Set X, IsClosed A → A ∈ F → x ∈ A := by
    intro A hA h
    by_contra H
    rw [le_nhds_iff] at cond
    specialize cond Aᶜ H hA.isOpen_compl
    rw [Ultrafilter.mem_coe, Ultrafilter.compl_mem_iff_not_mem] at cond
    contradiction
  -- If A ∈ F, then x ∈ cl A.
  have claim2 : ∀ A : Set X, A ∈ F → x ∈ cl A := by
    intro A hA
    exact claim1 (cl A) (isClosed_cl A) (mem_of_superset hA (subset_cl A))
  -- T0 is closed under intersections.
  have claim3 : ∀ (S1) (_ : S1 ∈ T0) (S2) (_ : S2 ∈ T0), S1 ∩ S2 ∈ T0 := by
    rintro S1 ⟨S1, hS1, rfl⟩ S2 ⟨S2, hS2, rfl⟩
    exact ⟨S1 ∩ S2, inter_mem hS1 hS2, by simp [basic_inter]⟩
  -- For every S ∈ T0, the intersection AA ∩ S is nonempty.
  have claim4 : ∀ S ∈ T0, (AA ∩ S).Nonempty := by
    rintro S ⟨S, hS, rfl⟩
    rcases claim2 _ hS with ⟨G, hG, hG2⟩
    exact ⟨G, hG2, hG⟩
  -- Every element of T0 is nonempty.
  have claim5 : ∀ S ∈ T0, Set.Nonempty S := by
    rintro S ⟨S, hS, rfl⟩
    exact ⟨F, hS⟩
  -- Every element of T2 is nonempty.
  have claim6 : ∀ S ∈ T2, Set.Nonempty S := by
    suffices ∀ S ∈ T2, S ∈ T0 ∨ ∃ Q ∈ T0, S = AA ∩ Q by
      intro S hS
      cases' this _ hS with h h
      · exact claim5 S h
      · rcases h with ⟨Q, hQ, rfl⟩
        exact claim4 Q hQ
    intro S hS
    apply finiteInterClosure_insert
    · constructor
      · use Set.univ
        refine' ⟨Filter.univ_sets _, _⟩
        ext
        refine' ⟨_, by tauto⟩
        · intro
          apply Filter.univ_sets
      · exact claim3
    · 

Proof state:
case H
X : Compactum
F : Ultrafilter X.A
x : X.A
fsu : Type u_1 := Finset (Set (Ultrafilter X.A))
ssu : Type u_1 := Set (Set (Ultrafilter X.A))
ι : fsu → ssu := fun x => ↑x
T0 : ssu := {S | ∃ A ∈ F, S = Compactum.basic A}
AA : Set (Ultrafilter X.A) := str X ⁻¹' {x}
T1 : ssu := insert AA T0
T2 : Set (Set (Ultrafilter X.A)) := finiteInterClosure T1
cond : ↑F ≤ 𝓝 x
claim1 : ∀ (A : Set X.A), IsClosed A → A ∈ F → x ∈ A
claim2 : ∀ A ∈ F, x ∈ Compactum.cl A
claim3 : ∀ S1 ∈ T0, ∀ S2 ∈ T0, S1 ∩ S2 ∈ T0
claim4 : ∀ S ∈ T0, Set.Nonempty (AA ∩ S)
claim5 : ∀ S ∈ T0, Set.Nonempty S
S : Set (Ultrafilter X.A)
hS : S ∈ T2
⊢ S ∈ finiteInterClosure (insert AA T0)

Next tactic:
exact hS
theorem str_eq_of_le_nhds {X : Compactum} (F : Ultrafilter X) (x : X) : ↑F ≤ 𝓝 x → X.str F = x := by
  -- Notation to be used in this proof.
  let fsu := Finset (Set (Ultrafilter X))
  let ssu := Set (Set (Ultrafilter X))
  let ι : fsu → ssu := fun x ↦ ↑x
  let T0 : ssu := { S | ∃ A ∈ F, S = basic A }
  let AA := X.str ⁻¹' {x}
  let T1 := insert AA T0
  let T2 := finiteInterClosure T1
  intro cond
  -- If F contains a closed set A, then x is contained in A.
  have claim1 : ∀ A : Set X, IsClosed A → A ∈ F → x ∈ A := by
    intro A hA h
    by_contra H
    rw [le_nhds_iff] at cond
    specialize cond Aᶜ H hA.isOpen_compl
    rw [Ultrafilter.mem_coe, Ultrafilter.compl_mem_iff_not_mem] at cond
    contradiction
  -- If A ∈ F, then x ∈ cl A.
  have claim2 : ∀ A : Set X, A ∈ F → x ∈ cl A := by
    intro A hA
    exact claim1 (cl A) (isClosed_cl A) (mem_of_superset hA (subset_cl A))
  -- T0 is closed under intersections.
  have claim3 : ∀ (S1) (_ : S1 ∈ T0) (S2) (_ : S2 ∈ T0), S1 ∩ S2 ∈ T0 := by
    rintro S1 ⟨S1, hS1, rfl⟩ S2 ⟨S2, hS2, rfl⟩
    exact ⟨S1 ∩ S2, inter_mem hS1 hS2, by simp [basic_inter]⟩
  -- For every S ∈ T0, the intersection AA ∩ S is nonempty.
  have claim4 : ∀ S ∈ T0, (AA ∩ S).Nonempty := by
    rintro S ⟨S, hS, rfl⟩
    rcases claim2 _ hS with ⟨G, hG, hG2⟩
    exact ⟨G, hG2, hG⟩
  -- Every element of T0 is nonempty.
  have claim5 : ∀ S ∈ T0, Set.Nonempty S := by
    rintro S ⟨S, hS, rfl⟩
    exact ⟨F, hS⟩
  -- Every element of T2 is nonempty.
  have claim6 : ∀ S ∈ T2, Set.Nonempty S := by
    suffices ∀ S ∈ T2, S ∈ T0 ∨ ∃ Q ∈ T0, S = AA ∩ Q by
      intro S hS
      cases' this _ hS with h h
      · exact claim5 S h
      · rcases h with ⟨Q, hQ, rfl⟩
        exact claim4 Q hQ
    intro S hS
    apply finiteInterClosure_insert
    · constructor
      · use Set.univ
        refine' ⟨Filter.univ_sets _, _⟩
        ext
        refine' ⟨_, by tauto⟩
        · intro
          apply Filter.univ_sets
      · exact claim3
    · exact hS
  -- It suffices to show that the intersection of any finite subset of T1 is nonempty.
  

Proof state:
X : Compactum
F : Ultrafilter X.A
x : X.A
fsu : Type u_1 := Finset (Set (Ultrafilter X.A))
ssu : Type u_1 := Set (Set (Ultrafilter X.A))
ι : fsu → ssu := fun x => ↑x
T0 : ssu := {S | ∃ A ∈ F, S = Compactum.basic A}
AA : Set (Ultrafilter X.A) := str X ⁻¹' {x}
T1 : ssu := insert AA T0
T2 : Set (Set (Ultrafilter X.A)) := finiteInterClosure T1
cond : ↑F ≤ 𝓝 x
claim1 : ∀ (A : Set X.A), IsClosed A → A ∈ F → x ∈ A
claim2 : ∀ A ∈ F, x ∈ Compactum.cl A
claim3 : ∀ S1 ∈ T0, ∀ S2 ∈ T0, S1 ∩ S2 ∈ T0
claim4 : ∀ S ∈ T0, Set.Nonempty (AA ∩ S)
claim5 : ∀ S ∈ T0, Set.Nonempty S
claim6 : ∀ S ∈ T2, Set.Nonempty S
⊢ str X F = x

Next tactic:
suffices ∀ F : fsu, ↑F ⊆ T1 → (⋂₀ ι F).Nonempty by
    obtain ⟨G, h1⟩ := Ultrafilter.exists_ultrafilter_of_finite_inter_nonempty _ this
    have c1 : X.join G = F := Ultrafilter.coe_le_coe.1 fun P hP => h1 (Or.inr ⟨P, hP, rfl⟩)
    have c2 : G.map X.str = X.incl x := by
      refine' Ultrafilter.coe_le_coe.1 fun P hP => _
      apply mem_of_superset (h1 (Or.inl rfl))
      rintro x ⟨rfl⟩
      exact hP
    simp [← c1, c2]
theorem str_eq_of_le_nhds {X : Compactum} (F : Ultrafilter X) (x : X) : ↑F ≤ 𝓝 x → X.str F = x := by
  -- Notation to be used in this proof.
  let fsu := Finset (Set (Ultrafilter X))
  let ssu := Set (Set (Ultrafilter X))
  let ι : fsu → ssu := fun x ↦ ↑x
  let T0 : ssu := { S | ∃ A ∈ F, S = basic A }
  let AA := X.str ⁻¹' {x}
  let T1 := insert AA T0
  let T2 := finiteInterClosure T1
  intro cond
  -- If F contains a closed set A, then x is contained in A.
  have claim1 : ∀ A : Set X, IsClosed A → A ∈ F → x ∈ A := by
    intro A hA h
    by_contra H
    rw [le_nhds_iff] at cond
    specialize cond Aᶜ H hA.isOpen_compl
    rw [Ultrafilter.mem_coe, Ultrafilter.compl_mem_iff_not_mem] at cond
    contradiction
  -- If A ∈ F, then x ∈ cl A.
  have claim2 : ∀ A : Set X, A ∈ F → x ∈ cl A := by
    intro A hA
    exact claim1 (cl A) (isClosed_cl A) (mem_of_superset hA (subset_cl A))
  -- T0 is closed under intersections.
  have claim3 : ∀ (S1) (_ : S1 ∈ T0) (S2) (_ : S2 ∈ T0), S1 ∩ S2 ∈ T0 := by
    rintro S1 ⟨S1, hS1, rfl⟩ S2 ⟨S2, hS2, rfl⟩
    exact ⟨S1 ∩ S2, inter_mem hS1 hS2, by simp [basic_inter]⟩
  -- For every S ∈ T0, the intersection AA ∩ S is nonempty.
  have claim4 : ∀ S ∈ T0, (AA ∩ S).Nonempty := by
    rintro S ⟨S, hS, rfl⟩
    rcases claim2 _ hS with ⟨G, hG, hG2⟩
    exact ⟨G, hG2, hG⟩
  -- Every element of T0 is nonempty.
  have claim5 : ∀ S ∈ T0, Set.Nonempty S := by
    rintro S ⟨S, hS, rfl⟩
    exact ⟨F, hS⟩
  -- Every element of T2 is nonempty.
  have claim6 : ∀ S ∈ T2, Set.Nonempty S := by
    suffices ∀ S ∈ T2, S ∈ T0 ∨ ∃ Q ∈ T0, S = AA ∩ Q by
      intro S hS
      cases' this _ hS with h h
      · exact claim5 S h
      · rcases h with ⟨Q, hQ, rfl⟩
        exact claim4 Q hQ
    intro S hS
    apply finiteInterClosure_insert
    · constructor
      · use Set.univ
        refine' ⟨Filter.univ_sets _, _⟩
        ext
        refine' ⟨_, by tauto⟩
        · intro
          apply Filter.univ_sets
      · exact claim3
    · exact hS
  -- It suffices to show that the intersection of any finite subset of T1 is nonempty.
  suffices ∀ F : fsu, ↑F ⊆ T1 → (⋂₀ ι F).Nonempty by
    

Proof state:
X : Compactum
F : Ultrafilter X.A
x : X.A
fsu : Type u_1 := Finset (Set (Ultrafilter X.A))
ssu : Type u_1 := Set (Set (Ultrafilter X.A))
ι : fsu → ssu := fun x => ↑x
T0 : ssu := {S | ∃ A ∈ F, S = Compactum.basic A}
AA : Set (Ultrafilter X.A) := str X ⁻¹' {x}
T1 : ssu := insert AA T0
T2 : Set (Set (Ultrafilter X.A)) := finiteInterClosure T1
cond : ↑F ≤ 𝓝 x
claim1 : ∀ (A : Set X.A), IsClosed A → A ∈ F → x ∈ A
claim2 : ∀ A ∈ F, x ∈ Compactum.cl A
claim3 : ∀ S1 ∈ T0, ∀ S2 ∈ T0, S1 ∩ S2 ∈ T0
claim4 : ∀ S ∈ T0, Set.Nonempty (AA ∩ S)
claim5 : ∀ S ∈ T0, Set.Nonempty S
claim6 : ∀ S ∈ T2, Set.Nonempty S
this : ∀ (F : fsu), ↑F ⊆ T1 → Set.Nonempty (⋂₀ ι F)
⊢ str X F = x

Next tactic:
obtain ⟨G, h1⟩ := Ultrafilter.exists_ultrafilter_of_finite_inter_nonempty _ this
theorem str_eq_of_le_nhds {X : Compactum} (F : Ultrafilter X) (x : X) : ↑F ≤ 𝓝 x → X.str F = x := by
  -- Notation to be used in this proof.
  let fsu := Finset (Set (Ultrafilter X))
  let ssu := Set (Set (Ultrafilter X))
  let ι : fsu → ssu := fun x ↦ ↑x
  let T0 : ssu := { S | ∃ A ∈ F, S = basic A }
  let AA := X.str ⁻¹' {x}
  let T1 := insert AA T0
  let T2 := finiteInterClosure T1
  intro cond
  -- If F contains a closed set A, then x is contained in A.
  have claim1 : ∀ A : Set X, IsClosed A → A ∈ F → x ∈ A := by
    intro A hA h
    by_contra H
    rw [le_nhds_iff] at cond
    specialize cond Aᶜ H hA.isOpen_compl
    rw [Ultrafilter.mem_coe, Ultrafilter.compl_mem_iff_not_mem] at cond
    contradiction
  -- If A ∈ F, then x ∈ cl A.
  have claim2 : ∀ A : Set X, A ∈ F → x ∈ cl A := by
    intro A hA
    exact claim1 (cl A) (isClosed_cl A) (mem_of_superset hA (subset_cl A))
  -- T0 is closed under intersections.
  have claim3 : ∀ (S1) (_ : S1 ∈ T0) (S2) (_ : S2 ∈ T0), S1 ∩ S2 ∈ T0 := by
    rintro S1 ⟨S1, hS1, rfl⟩ S2 ⟨S2, hS2, rfl⟩
    exact ⟨S1 ∩ S2, inter_mem hS1 hS2, by simp [basic_inter]⟩
  -- For every S ∈ T0, the intersection AA ∩ S is nonempty.
  have claim4 : ∀ S ∈ T0, (AA ∩ S).Nonempty := by
    rintro S ⟨S, hS, rfl⟩
    rcases claim2 _ hS with ⟨G, hG, hG2⟩
    exact ⟨G, hG2, hG⟩
  -- Every element of T0 is nonempty.
  have claim5 : ∀ S ∈ T0, Set.Nonempty S := by
    rintro S ⟨S, hS, rfl⟩
    exact ⟨F, hS⟩
  -- Every element of T2 is nonempty.
  have claim6 : ∀ S ∈ T2, Set.Nonempty S := by
    suffices ∀ S ∈ T2, S ∈ T0 ∨ ∃ Q ∈ T0, S = AA ∩ Q by
      intro S hS
      cases' this _ hS with h h
      · exact claim5 S h
      · rcases h with ⟨Q, hQ, rfl⟩
        exact claim4 Q hQ
    intro S hS
    apply finiteInterClosure_insert
    · constructor
      · use Set.univ
        refine' ⟨Filter.univ_sets _, _⟩
        ext
        refine' ⟨_, by tauto⟩
        · intro
          apply Filter.univ_sets
      · exact claim3
    · exact hS
  -- It suffices to show that the intersection of any finite subset of T1 is nonempty.
  suffices ∀ F : fsu, ↑F ⊆ T1 → (⋂₀ ι F).Nonempty by
    obtain ⟨G, h1⟩ := Ultrafilter.exists_ultrafilter_of_finite_inter_nonempty _ this
    

Proof state:
case intro
X : Compactum
F : Ultrafilter X.A
x : X.A
fsu : Type u_1 := Finset (Set (Ultrafilter X.A))
ssu : Type u_1 := Set (Set (Ultrafilter X.A))
ι : fsu → ssu := fun x => ↑x
T0 : ssu := {S | ∃ A ∈ F, S = Compactum.basic A}
AA : Set (Ultrafilter X.A) := str X ⁻¹' {x}
T1 : ssu := insert AA T0
T2 : Set (Set (Ultrafilter X.A)) := finiteInterClosure T1
cond : ↑F ≤ 𝓝 x
claim1 : ∀ (A : Set X.A), IsClosed A → A ∈ F → x ∈ A
claim2 : ∀ A ∈ F, x ∈ Compactum.cl A
claim3 : ∀ S1 ∈ T0, ∀ S2 ∈ T0, S1 ∩ S2 ∈ T0
claim4 : ∀ S ∈ T0, Set.Nonempty (AA ∩ S)
claim5 : ∀ S ∈ T0, Set.Nonempty S
claim6 : ∀ S ∈ T2, Set.Nonempty S
this : ∀ (F : fsu), ↑F ⊆ T1 → Set.Nonempty (⋂₀ ι F)
G : Ultrafilter (Ultrafilter X.A)
h1 : T1 ⊆ G.sets
⊢ str X F = x

Next tactic:
have c1 : X.join G = F := Ultrafilter.coe_le_coe.1 fun P hP => h1 (Or.inr ⟨P, hP, rfl⟩)