l3lab/ntp-mathlib huggingface dataset:
/-- If `f` is a sequence of functions which converges in measure to `g`, then there exists a
subsequence of `f` which converges a.e. to `g`. -/
theorem TendstoInMeasure.exists_seq_tendsto_ae (hfg : TendstoInMeasure μ f atTop g) :
    ∃ ns : ℕ → ℕ, StrictMono ns ∧ ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, Tendsto (fun i => f (ns i) x) atTop (𝓝 (g x)) := by
  /- Since `f` tends to `g` in measure, it has a subsequence `k ↦ f (ns k)` such that
    `μ {|f (ns k) - g| ≥ 2⁻ᵏ} ≤ 2⁻ᵏ` for all `k`. Defining
    `s := ⋂ k, ⋃ i ≥ k, {|f (ns k) - g| ≥ 2⁻ᵏ}`, we see that `μ s = 0` by the
    first Borel-Cantelli lemma.

    On the other hand, as `s` is precisely the set for which `f (ns k)`
    doesn't converge to `g`, `f (ns k)` converges almost everywhere to `g` as required. -/
  have h_lt_ε_real : ∀ (ε : ℝ) (_ : 0 < ε), ∃ k : ℕ, 2 * (2 : ℝ)⁻¹ ^ k < ε := by
    

Proof state:
α : Type u_1
ι : Type u_2
E : Type u_3
m : MeasurableSpace α
μ : Measure α
inst✝ : MetricSpace E
f : ℕ → α → E
g : α → E
hfg : TendstoInMeasure μ f atTop g
⊢ ∀ (ε : ℝ), 0 < ε → ∃ k, 2 * 2⁻¹ ^ k < ε

Next tactic:
intro ε hε
/-- If `f` is a sequence of functions which converges in measure to `g`, then there exists a
subsequence of `f` which converges a.e. to `g`. -/
theorem TendstoInMeasure.exists_seq_tendsto_ae (hfg : TendstoInMeasure μ f atTop g) :
    ∃ ns : ℕ → ℕ, StrictMono ns ∧ ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, Tendsto (fun i => f (ns i) x) atTop (𝓝 (g x)) := by
  /- Since `f` tends to `g` in measure, it has a subsequence `k ↦ f (ns k)` such that
    `μ {|f (ns k) - g| ≥ 2⁻ᵏ} ≤ 2⁻ᵏ` for all `k`. Defining
    `s := ⋂ k, ⋃ i ≥ k, {|f (ns k) - g| ≥ 2⁻ᵏ}`, we see that `μ s = 0` by the
    first Borel-Cantelli lemma.

    On the other hand, as `s` is precisely the set for which `f (ns k)`
    doesn't converge to `g`, `f (ns k)` converges almost everywhere to `g` as required. -/
  have h_lt_ε_real : ∀ (ε : ℝ) (_ : 0 < ε), ∃ k : ℕ, 2 * (2 : ℝ)⁻¹ ^ k < ε := by
    intro ε hε
    

Proof state:
α : Type u_1
ι : Type u_2
E : Type u_3
m : MeasurableSpace α
μ : Measure α
inst✝ : MetricSpace E
f : ℕ → α → E
g : α → E
hfg : TendstoInMeasure μ f atTop g
ε : ℝ
hε : 0 < ε
⊢ ∃ k, 2 * 2⁻¹ ^ k < ε

Next tactic:
obtain ⟨k, h_k⟩ : ∃ k : ℕ, (2 : ℝ)⁻¹ ^ k < ε := exists_pow_lt_of_lt_one hε (by norm_num)
/-- If `f` is a sequence of functions which converges in measure to `g`, then there exists a
subsequence of `f` which converges a.e. to `g`. -/
theorem TendstoInMeasure.exists_seq_tendsto_ae (hfg : TendstoInMeasure μ f atTop g) :
    ∃ ns : ℕ → ℕ, StrictMono ns ∧ ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, Tendsto (fun i => f (ns i) x) atTop (𝓝 (g x)) := by
  /- Since `f` tends to `g` in measure, it has a subsequence `k ↦ f (ns k)` such that
    `μ {|f (ns k) - g| ≥ 2⁻ᵏ} ≤ 2⁻ᵏ` for all `k`. Defining
    `s := ⋂ k, ⋃ i ≥ k, {|f (ns k) - g| ≥ 2⁻ᵏ}`, we see that `μ s = 0` by the
    first Borel-Cantelli lemma.

    On the other hand, as `s` is precisely the set for which `f (ns k)`
    doesn't converge to `g`, `f (ns k)` converges almost everywhere to `g` as required. -/
  have h_lt_ε_real : ∀ (ε : ℝ) (_ : 0 < ε), ∃ k : ℕ, 2 * (2 : ℝ)⁻¹ ^ k < ε := by
    intro ε hε
    obtain ⟨k, h_k⟩ : ∃ k : ℕ, (2 : ℝ)⁻¹ ^ k < ε := exists_pow_lt_of_lt_one hε (by 

Proof state:
α : Type u_1
ι : Type u_2
E : Type u_3
m : MeasurableSpace α
μ : Measure α
inst✝ : MetricSpace E
f : ℕ → α → E
g : α → E
hfg : TendstoInMeasure μ f atTop g
ε : ℝ
hε : 0 < ε
⊢ 2⁻¹ < 1

Next tactic:
norm_num
/-- If `f` is a sequence of functions which converges in measure to `g`, then there exists a
subsequence of `f` which converges a.e. to `g`. -/
theorem TendstoInMeasure.exists_seq_tendsto_ae (hfg : TendstoInMeasure μ f atTop g) :
    ∃ ns : ℕ → ℕ, StrictMono ns ∧ ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, Tendsto (fun i => f (ns i) x) atTop (𝓝 (g x)) := by
  /- Since `f` tends to `g` in measure, it has a subsequence `k ↦ f (ns k)` such that
    `μ {|f (ns k) - g| ≥ 2⁻ᵏ} ≤ 2⁻ᵏ` for all `k`. Defining
    `s := ⋂ k, ⋃ i ≥ k, {|f (ns k) - g| ≥ 2⁻ᵏ}`, we see that `μ s = 0` by the
    first Borel-Cantelli lemma.

    On the other hand, as `s` is precisely the set for which `f (ns k)`
    doesn't converge to `g`, `f (ns k)` converges almost everywhere to `g` as required. -/
  have h_lt_ε_real : ∀ (ε : ℝ) (_ : 0 < ε), ∃ k : ℕ, 2 * (2 : ℝ)⁻¹ ^ k < ε := by
    intro ε hε
    obtain ⟨k, h_k⟩ : ∃ k : ℕ, (2 : ℝ)⁻¹ ^ k < ε := exists_pow_lt_of_lt_one hε (by norm_num)
    

Proof state:
case intro
α : Type u_1
ι : Type u_2
E : Type u_3
m : MeasurableSpace α
μ : Measure α
inst✝ : MetricSpace E
f : ℕ → α → E
g : α → E
hfg : TendstoInMeasure μ f atTop g
ε : ℝ
hε : 0 < ε
k : ℕ
h_k : 2⁻¹ ^ k < ε
⊢ ∃ k, 2 * 2⁻¹ ^ k < ε

Next tactic:
refine' ⟨k + 1, (le_of_eq _).trans_lt h_k⟩
/-- If `f` is a sequence of functions which converges in measure to `g`, then there exists a
subsequence of `f` which converges a.e. to `g`. -/
theorem TendstoInMeasure.exists_seq_tendsto_ae (hfg : TendstoInMeasure μ f atTop g) :
    ∃ ns : ℕ → ℕ, StrictMono ns ∧ ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, Tendsto (fun i => f (ns i) x) atTop (𝓝 (g x)) := by
  /- Since `f` tends to `g` in measure, it has a subsequence `k ↦ f (ns k)` such that
    `μ {|f (ns k) - g| ≥ 2⁻ᵏ} ≤ 2⁻ᵏ` for all `k`. Defining
    `s := ⋂ k, ⋃ i ≥ k, {|f (ns k) - g| ≥ 2⁻ᵏ}`, we see that `μ s = 0` by the
    first Borel-Cantelli lemma.

    On the other hand, as `s` is precisely the set for which `f (ns k)`
    doesn't converge to `g`, `f (ns k)` converges almost everywhere to `g` as required. -/
  have h_lt_ε_real : ∀ (ε : ℝ) (_ : 0 < ε), ∃ k : ℕ, 2 * (2 : ℝ)⁻¹ ^ k < ε := by
    intro ε hε
    obtain ⟨k, h_k⟩ : ∃ k : ℕ, (2 : ℝ)⁻¹ ^ k < ε := exists_pow_lt_of_lt_one hε (by norm_num)
    refine' ⟨k + 1, (le_of_eq _).trans_lt h_k⟩
    

Proof state:
case intro
α : Type u_1
ι : Type u_2
E : Type u_3
m : MeasurableSpace α
μ : Measure α
inst✝ : MetricSpace E
f : ℕ → α → E
g : α → E
hfg : TendstoInMeasure μ f atTop g
ε : ℝ
hε : 0 < ε
k : ℕ
h_k : 2⁻¹ ^ k < ε
⊢ 2 * 2⁻¹ ^ (k + 1) = 2⁻¹ ^ k

Next tactic:
rw [pow_add]
/-- If `f` is a sequence of functions which converges in measure to `g`, then there exists a
subsequence of `f` which converges a.e. to `g`. -/
theorem TendstoInMeasure.exists_seq_tendsto_ae (hfg : TendstoInMeasure μ f atTop g) :
    ∃ ns : ℕ → ℕ, StrictMono ns ∧ ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, Tendsto (fun i => f (ns i) x) atTop (𝓝 (g x)) := by
  /- Since `f` tends to `g` in measure, it has a subsequence `k ↦ f (ns k)` such that
    `μ {|f (ns k) - g| ≥ 2⁻ᵏ} ≤ 2⁻ᵏ` for all `k`. Defining
    `s := ⋂ k, ⋃ i ≥ k, {|f (ns k) - g| ≥ 2⁻ᵏ}`, we see that `μ s = 0` by the
    first Borel-Cantelli lemma.

    On the other hand, as `s` is precisely the set for which `f (ns k)`
    doesn't converge to `g`, `f (ns k)` converges almost everywhere to `g` as required. -/
  have h_lt_ε_real : ∀ (ε : ℝ) (_ : 0 < ε), ∃ k : ℕ, 2 * (2 : ℝ)⁻¹ ^ k < ε := by
    intro ε hε
    obtain ⟨k, h_k⟩ : ∃ k : ℕ, (2 : ℝ)⁻¹ ^ k < ε := exists_pow_lt_of_lt_one hε (by norm_num)
    refine' ⟨k + 1, (le_of_eq _).trans_lt h_k⟩
    rw [pow_add]; 

Proof state:
case intro
α : Type u_1
ι : Type u_2
E : Type u_3
m : MeasurableSpace α
μ : Measure α
inst✝ : MetricSpace E
f : ℕ → α → E
g : α → E
hfg : TendstoInMeasure μ f atTop g
ε : ℝ
hε : 0 < ε
k : ℕ
h_k : 2⁻¹ ^ k < ε
⊢ 2 * (2⁻¹ ^ k * 2⁻¹ ^ 1) = 2⁻¹ ^ k

Next tactic:
ring
/-- If `f` is a sequence of functions which converges in measure to `g`, then there exists a
subsequence of `f` which converges a.e. to `g`. -/
theorem TendstoInMeasure.exists_seq_tendsto_ae (hfg : TendstoInMeasure μ f atTop g) :
    ∃ ns : ℕ → ℕ, StrictMono ns ∧ ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, Tendsto (fun i => f (ns i) x) atTop (𝓝 (g x)) := by
  /- Since `f` tends to `g` in measure, it has a subsequence `k ↦ f (ns k)` such that
    `μ {|f (ns k) - g| ≥ 2⁻ᵏ} ≤ 2⁻ᵏ` for all `k`. Defining
    `s := ⋂ k, ⋃ i ≥ k, {|f (ns k) - g| ≥ 2⁻ᵏ}`, we see that `μ s = 0` by the
    first Borel-Cantelli lemma.

    On the other hand, as `s` is precisely the set for which `f (ns k)`
    doesn't converge to `g`, `f (ns k)` converges almost everywhere to `g` as required. -/
  have h_lt_ε_real : ∀ (ε : ℝ) (_ : 0 < ε), ∃ k : ℕ, 2 * (2 : ℝ)⁻¹ ^ k < ε := by
    intro ε hε
    obtain ⟨k, h_k⟩ : ∃ k : ℕ, (2 : ℝ)⁻¹ ^ k < ε := exists_pow_lt_of_lt_one hε (by norm_num)
    refine' ⟨k + 1, (le_of_eq _).trans_lt h_k⟩
    rw [pow_add]; ring
  

Proof state:
α : Type u_1
ι : Type u_2
E : Type u_3
m : MeasurableSpace α
μ : Measure α
inst✝ : MetricSpace E
f : ℕ → α → E
g : α → E
hfg : TendstoInMeasure μ f atTop g
h_lt_ε_real : ∀ (ε : ℝ), 0 < ε → ∃ k, 2 * 2⁻¹ ^ k < ε
⊢ ∃ ns, StrictMono ns ∧ ∀ᵐ (x : α) ∂μ, Tendsto (fun i => f (ns i) x) atTop (𝓝 (g x))

Next tactic:
set ns := ExistsSeqTendstoAe.seqTendstoAeSeq hfg
/-- If `f` is a sequence of functions which converges in measure to `g`, then there exists a
subsequence of `f` which converges a.e. to `g`. -/
theorem TendstoInMeasure.exists_seq_tendsto_ae (hfg : TendstoInMeasure μ f atTop g) :
    ∃ ns : ℕ → ℕ, StrictMono ns ∧ ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, Tendsto (fun i => f (ns i) x) atTop (𝓝 (g x)) := by
  /- Since `f` tends to `g` in measure, it has a subsequence `k ↦ f (ns k)` such that
    `μ {|f (ns k) - g| ≥ 2⁻ᵏ} ≤ 2⁻ᵏ` for all `k`. Defining
    `s := ⋂ k, ⋃ i ≥ k, {|f (ns k) - g| ≥ 2⁻ᵏ}`, we see that `μ s = 0` by the
    first Borel-Cantelli lemma.

    On the other hand, as `s` is precisely the set for which `f (ns k)`
    doesn't converge to `g`, `f (ns k)` converges almost everywhere to `g` as required. -/
  have h_lt_ε_real : ∀ (ε : ℝ) (_ : 0 < ε), ∃ k : ℕ, 2 * (2 : ℝ)⁻¹ ^ k < ε := by
    intro ε hε
    obtain ⟨k, h_k⟩ : ∃ k : ℕ, (2 : ℝ)⁻¹ ^ k < ε := exists_pow_lt_of_lt_one hε (by norm_num)
    refine' ⟨k + 1, (le_of_eq _).trans_lt h_k⟩
    rw [pow_add]; ring
  set ns := ExistsSeqTendstoAe.seqTendstoAeSeq hfg
  

Proof state:
α : Type u_1
ι : Type u_2
E : Type u_3
m : MeasurableSpace α
μ : Measure α
inst✝ : MetricSpace E
f : ℕ → α → E
g : α → E
hfg : TendstoInMeasure μ f atTop g
h_lt_ε_real : ∀ (ε : ℝ), 0 < ε → ∃ k, 2 * 2⁻¹ ^ k < ε
ns : ℕ → ℕ := ExistsSeqTendstoAe.seqTendstoAeSeq hfg
⊢ ∃ ns, StrictMono ns ∧ ∀ᵐ (x : α) ∂μ, Tendsto (fun i => f (ns i) x) atTop (𝓝 (g x))

Next tactic:
use ns
/-- If `f` is a sequence of functions which converges in measure to `g`, then there exists a
subsequence of `f` which converges a.e. to `g`. -/
theorem TendstoInMeasure.exists_seq_tendsto_ae (hfg : TendstoInMeasure μ f atTop g) :
    ∃ ns : ℕ → ℕ, StrictMono ns ∧ ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, Tendsto (fun i => f (ns i) x) atTop (𝓝 (g x)) := by
  /- Since `f` tends to `g` in measure, it has a subsequence `k ↦ f (ns k)` such that
    `μ {|f (ns k) - g| ≥ 2⁻ᵏ} ≤ 2⁻ᵏ` for all `k`. Defining
    `s := ⋂ k, ⋃ i ≥ k, {|f (ns k) - g| ≥ 2⁻ᵏ}`, we see that `μ s = 0` by the
    first Borel-Cantelli lemma.

    On the other hand, as `s` is precisely the set for which `f (ns k)`
    doesn't converge to `g`, `f (ns k)` converges almost everywhere to `g` as required. -/
  have h_lt_ε_real : ∀ (ε : ℝ) (_ : 0 < ε), ∃ k : ℕ, 2 * (2 : ℝ)⁻¹ ^ k < ε := by
    intro ε hε
    obtain ⟨k, h_k⟩ : ∃ k : ℕ, (2 : ℝ)⁻¹ ^ k < ε := exists_pow_lt_of_lt_one hε (by norm_num)
    refine' ⟨k + 1, (le_of_eq _).trans_lt h_k⟩
    rw [pow_add]; ring
  set ns := ExistsSeqTendstoAe.seqTendstoAeSeq hfg
  use ns
  

Proof state:
case h
α : Type u_1
ι : Type u_2
E : Type u_3
m : MeasurableSpace α
μ : Measure α
inst✝ : MetricSpace E
f : ℕ → α → E
g : α → E
hfg : TendstoInMeasure μ f atTop g
h_lt_ε_real : ∀ (ε : ℝ), 0 < ε → ∃ k, 2 * 2⁻¹ ^ k < ε
ns : ℕ → ℕ := ExistsSeqTendstoAe.seqTendstoAeSeq hfg
⊢ StrictMono ns ∧ ∀ᵐ (x : α) ∂μ, Tendsto (fun i => f (ns i) x) atTop (𝓝 (g x))

Next tactic:
let S := fun k => { x | (2 : ℝ)⁻¹ ^ k ≤ dist (f (ns k) x) (g x) }
/-- If `f` is a sequence of functions which converges in measure to `g`, then there exists a
subsequence of `f` which converges a.e. to `g`. -/
theorem TendstoInMeasure.exists_seq_tendsto_ae (hfg : TendstoInMeasure μ f atTop g) :
    ∃ ns : ℕ → ℕ, StrictMono ns ∧ ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, Tendsto (fun i => f (ns i) x) atTop (𝓝 (g x)) := by
  /- Since `f` tends to `g` in measure, it has a subsequence `k ↦ f (ns k)` such that
    `μ {|f (ns k) - g| ≥ 2⁻ᵏ} ≤ 2⁻ᵏ` for all `k`. Defining
    `s := ⋂ k, ⋃ i ≥ k, {|f (ns k) - g| ≥ 2⁻ᵏ}`, we see that `μ s = 0` by the
    first Borel-Cantelli lemma.

    On the other hand, as `s` is precisely the set for which `f (ns k)`
    doesn't converge to `g`, `f (ns k)` converges almost everywhere to `g` as required. -/
  have h_lt_ε_real : ∀ (ε : ℝ) (_ : 0 < ε), ∃ k : ℕ, 2 * (2 : ℝ)⁻¹ ^ k < ε := by
    intro ε hε
    obtain ⟨k, h_k⟩ : ∃ k : ℕ, (2 : ℝ)⁻¹ ^ k < ε := exists_pow_lt_of_lt_one hε (by norm_num)
    refine' ⟨k + 1, (le_of_eq _).trans_lt h_k⟩
    rw [pow_add]; ring
  set ns := ExistsSeqTendstoAe.seqTendstoAeSeq hfg
  use ns
  let S := fun k => { x | (2 : ℝ)⁻¹ ^ k ≤ dist (f (ns k) x) (g x) }
  

Proof state:
case h
α : Type u_1
ι : Type u_2
E : Type u_3
m : MeasurableSpace α
μ : Measure α
inst✝ : MetricSpace E
f : ℕ → α → E
g : α → E
hfg : TendstoInMeasure μ f atTop g
h_lt_ε_real : ∀ (ε : ℝ), 0 < ε → ∃ k, 2 * 2⁻¹ ^ k < ε
ns : ℕ → ℕ := ExistsSeqTendstoAe.seqTendstoAeSeq hfg
S : ℕ → Set α := fun k => {x | 2⁻¹ ^ k ≤ dist (f (ns k) x) (g x)}
⊢ StrictMono ns ∧ ∀ᵐ (x : α) ∂μ, Tendsto (fun i => f (ns i) x) atTop (𝓝 (g x))

Next tactic:
have hμS_le : ∀ k, μ (S k) ≤ (2 : ℝ≥0∞)⁻¹ ^ k :=
    fun k => ExistsSeqTendstoAe.seqTendstoAeSeq_spec hfg k (ns k) le_rfl
/-- If `f` is a sequence of functions which converges in measure to `g`, then there exists a
subsequence of `f` which converges a.e. to `g`. -/
theorem TendstoInMeasure.exists_seq_tendsto_ae (hfg : TendstoInMeasure μ f atTop g) :
    ∃ ns : ℕ → ℕ, StrictMono ns ∧ ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, Tendsto (fun i => f (ns i) x) atTop (𝓝 (g x)) := by
  /- Since `f` tends to `g` in measure, it has a subsequence `k ↦ f (ns k)` such that
    `μ {|f (ns k) - g| ≥ 2⁻ᵏ} ≤ 2⁻ᵏ` for all `k`. Defining
    `s := ⋂ k, ⋃ i ≥ k, {|f (ns k) - g| ≥ 2⁻ᵏ}`, we see that `μ s = 0` by the
    first Borel-Cantelli lemma.

    On the other hand, as `s` is precisely the set for which `f (ns k)`
    doesn't converge to `g`, `f (ns k)` converges almost everywhere to `g` as required. -/
  have h_lt_ε_real : ∀ (ε : ℝ) (_ : 0 < ε), ∃ k : ℕ, 2 * (2 : ℝ)⁻¹ ^ k < ε := by
    intro ε hε
    obtain ⟨k, h_k⟩ : ∃ k : ℕ, (2 : ℝ)⁻¹ ^ k < ε := exists_pow_lt_of_lt_one hε (by norm_num)
    refine' ⟨k + 1, (le_of_eq _).trans_lt h_k⟩
    rw [pow_add]; ring
  set ns := ExistsSeqTendstoAe.seqTendstoAeSeq hfg
  use ns
  let S := fun k => { x | (2 : ℝ)⁻¹ ^ k ≤ dist (f (ns k) x) (g x) }
  have hμS_le : ∀ k, μ (S k) ≤ (2 : ℝ≥0∞)⁻¹ ^ k :=
    fun k => ExistsSeqTendstoAe.seqTendstoAeSeq_spec hfg k (ns k) le_rfl
  

Proof state:
case h
α : Type u_1
ι : Type u_2
E : Type u_3
m : MeasurableSpace α
μ : Measure α
inst✝ : MetricSpace E
f : ℕ → α → E
g : α → E
hfg : TendstoInMeasure μ f atTop g
h_lt_ε_real : ∀ (ε : ℝ), 0 < ε → ∃ k, 2 * 2⁻¹ ^ k < ε
ns : ℕ → ℕ := ExistsSeqTendstoAe.seqTendstoAeSeq hfg
S : ℕ → Set α := fun k => {x | 2⁻¹ ^ k ≤ dist (f (ns k) x) (g x)}
hμS_le : ∀ (k : ℕ), ↑↑μ (S k) ≤ 2⁻¹ ^ k
⊢ StrictMono ns ∧ ∀ᵐ (x : α) ∂μ, Tendsto (fun i => f (ns i) x) atTop (𝓝 (g x))

Next tactic:
set s := Filter.atTop.limsup S with hs
/-- If `f` is a sequence of functions which converges in measure to `g`, then there exists a
subsequence of `f` which converges a.e. to `g`. -/
theorem TendstoInMeasure.exists_seq_tendsto_ae (hfg : TendstoInMeasure μ f atTop g) :
    ∃ ns : ℕ → ℕ, StrictMono ns ∧ ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, Tendsto (fun i => f (ns i) x) atTop (𝓝 (g x)) := by
  /- Since `f` tends to `g` in measure, it has a subsequence `k ↦ f (ns k)` such that
    `μ {|f (ns k) - g| ≥ 2⁻ᵏ} ≤ 2⁻ᵏ` for all `k`. Defining
    `s := ⋂ k, ⋃ i ≥ k, {|f (ns k) - g| ≥ 2⁻ᵏ}`, we see that `μ s = 0` by the
    first Borel-Cantelli lemma.

    On the other hand, as `s` is precisely the set for which `f (ns k)`
    doesn't converge to `g`, `f (ns k)` converges almost everywhere to `g` as required. -/
  have h_lt_ε_real : ∀ (ε : ℝ) (_ : 0 < ε), ∃ k : ℕ, 2 * (2 : ℝ)⁻¹ ^ k < ε := by
    intro ε hε
    obtain ⟨k, h_k⟩ : ∃ k : ℕ, (2 : ℝ)⁻¹ ^ k < ε := exists_pow_lt_of_lt_one hε (by norm_num)
    refine' ⟨k + 1, (le_of_eq _).trans_lt h_k⟩
    rw [pow_add]; ring
  set ns := ExistsSeqTendstoAe.seqTendstoAeSeq hfg
  use ns
  let S := fun k => { x | (2 : ℝ)⁻¹ ^ k ≤ dist (f (ns k) x) (g x) }
  have hμS_le : ∀ k, μ (S k) ≤ (2 : ℝ≥0∞)⁻¹ ^ k :=
    fun k => ExistsSeqTendstoAe.seqTendstoAeSeq_spec hfg k (ns k) le_rfl
  set s := Filter.atTop.limsup S with hs
  

Proof state:
case h
α : Type u_1
ι : Type u_2
E : Type u_3
m : MeasurableSpace α
μ : Measure α
inst✝ : MetricSpace E
f : ℕ → α → E
g : α → E
hfg : TendstoInMeasure μ f atTop g
h_lt_ε_real : ∀ (ε : ℝ), 0 < ε → ∃ k, 2 * 2⁻¹ ^ k < ε
ns : ℕ → ℕ := ExistsSeqTendstoAe.seqTendstoAeSeq hfg
S : ℕ → Set α := fun k => {x | 2⁻¹ ^ k ≤ dist (f (ns k) x) (g x)}
hμS_le : ∀ (k : ℕ), ↑↑μ (S k) ≤ 2⁻¹ ^ k
s : Set α := limsup S atTop
hs : s = limsup S atTop
⊢ StrictMono ns ∧ ∀ᵐ (x : α) ∂μ, Tendsto (fun i => f (ns i) x) atTop (𝓝 (g x))

Next tactic:
have hμs : μ s = 0 := by
    refine' measure_limsup_eq_zero (ne_of_lt <| lt_of_le_of_lt (ENNReal.tsum_le_tsum hμS_le) _)
    simp only [ENNReal.tsum_geometric, ENNReal.one_sub_inv_two, ENNReal.two_lt_top, inv_inv]
/-- If `f` is a sequence of functions which converges in measure to `g`, then there exists a
subsequence of `f` which converges a.e. to `g`. -/
theorem TendstoInMeasure.exists_seq_tendsto_ae (hfg : TendstoInMeasure μ f atTop g) :
    ∃ ns : ℕ → ℕ, StrictMono ns ∧ ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, Tendsto (fun i => f (ns i) x) atTop (𝓝 (g x)) := by
  /- Since `f` tends to `g` in measure, it has a subsequence `k ↦ f (ns k)` such that
    `μ {|f (ns k) - g| ≥ 2⁻ᵏ} ≤ 2⁻ᵏ` for all `k`. Defining
    `s := ⋂ k, ⋃ i ≥ k, {|f (ns k) - g| ≥ 2⁻ᵏ}`, we see that `μ s = 0` by the
    first Borel-Cantelli lemma.

    On the other hand, as `s` is precisely the set for which `f (ns k)`
    doesn't converge to `g`, `f (ns k)` converges almost everywhere to `g` as required. -/
  have h_lt_ε_real : ∀ (ε : ℝ) (_ : 0 < ε), ∃ k : ℕ, 2 * (2 : ℝ)⁻¹ ^ k < ε := by
    intro ε hε
    obtain ⟨k, h_k⟩ : ∃ k : ℕ, (2 : ℝ)⁻¹ ^ k < ε := exists_pow_lt_of_lt_one hε (by norm_num)
    refine' ⟨k + 1, (le_of_eq _).trans_lt h_k⟩
    rw [pow_add]; ring
  set ns := ExistsSeqTendstoAe.seqTendstoAeSeq hfg
  use ns
  let S := fun k => { x | (2 : ℝ)⁻¹ ^ k ≤ dist (f (ns k) x) (g x) }
  have hμS_le : ∀ k, μ (S k) ≤ (2 : ℝ≥0∞)⁻¹ ^ k :=
    fun k => ExistsSeqTendstoAe.seqTendstoAeSeq_spec hfg k (ns k) le_rfl
  set s := Filter.atTop.limsup S with hs
  have hμs : μ s = 0 := by
    

Proof state:
α : Type u_1
ι : Type u_2
E : Type u_3
m : MeasurableSpace α
μ : Measure α
inst✝ : MetricSpace E
f : ℕ → α → E
g : α → E
hfg : TendstoInMeasure μ f atTop g
h_lt_ε_real : ∀ (ε : ℝ), 0 < ε → ∃ k, 2 * 2⁻¹ ^ k < ε
ns : ℕ → ℕ := ExistsSeqTendstoAe.seqTendstoAeSeq hfg
S : ℕ → Set α := fun k => {x | 2⁻¹ ^ k ≤ dist (f (ns k) x) (g x)}
hμS_le : ∀ (k : ℕ), ↑↑μ (S k) ≤ 2⁻¹ ^ k
s : Set α := limsup S atTop
hs : s = limsup S atTop
⊢ ↑↑μ s = 0

Next tactic:
refine' measure_limsup_eq_zero (ne_of_lt <| lt_of_le_of_lt (ENNReal.tsum_le_tsum hμS_le) _)
/-- If `f` is a sequence of functions which converges in measure to `g`, then there exists a
subsequence of `f` which converges a.e. to `g`. -/
theorem TendstoInMeasure.exists_seq_tendsto_ae (hfg : TendstoInMeasure μ f atTop g) :
    ∃ ns : ℕ → ℕ, StrictMono ns ∧ ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, Tendsto (fun i => f (ns i) x) atTop (𝓝 (g x)) := by
  /- Since `f` tends to `g` in measure, it has a subsequence `k ↦ f (ns k)` such that
    `μ {|f (ns k) - g| ≥ 2⁻ᵏ} ≤ 2⁻ᵏ` for all `k`. Defining
    `s := ⋂ k, ⋃ i ≥ k, {|f (ns k) - g| ≥ 2⁻ᵏ}`, we see that `μ s = 0` by the
    first Borel-Cantelli lemma.

    On the other hand, as `s` is precisely the set for which `f (ns k)`
    doesn't converge to `g`, `f (ns k)` converges almost everywhere to `g` as required. -/
  have h_lt_ε_real : ∀ (ε : ℝ) (_ : 0 < ε), ∃ k : ℕ, 2 * (2 : ℝ)⁻¹ ^ k < ε := by
    intro ε hε
    obtain ⟨k, h_k⟩ : ∃ k : ℕ, (2 : ℝ)⁻¹ ^ k < ε := exists_pow_lt_of_lt_one hε (by norm_num)
    refine' ⟨k + 1, (le_of_eq _).trans_lt h_k⟩
    rw [pow_add]; ring
  set ns := ExistsSeqTendstoAe.seqTendstoAeSeq hfg
  use ns
  let S := fun k => { x | (2 : ℝ)⁻¹ ^ k ≤ dist (f (ns k) x) (g x) }
  have hμS_le : ∀ k, μ (S k) ≤ (2 : ℝ≥0∞)⁻¹ ^ k :=
    fun k => ExistsSeqTendstoAe.seqTendstoAeSeq_spec hfg k (ns k) le_rfl
  set s := Filter.atTop.limsup S with hs
  have hμs : μ s = 0 := by
    refine' measure_limsup_eq_zero (ne_of_lt <| lt_of_le_of_lt (ENNReal.tsum_le_tsum hμS_le) _)
    

Proof state:
α : Type u_1
ι : Type u_2
E : Type u_3
m : MeasurableSpace α
μ : Measure α
inst✝ : MetricSpace E
f : ℕ → α → E
g : α → E
hfg : TendstoInMeasure μ f atTop g
h_lt_ε_real : ∀ (ε : ℝ), 0 < ε → ∃ k, 2 * 2⁻¹ ^ k < ε
ns : ℕ → ℕ := ExistsSeqTendstoAe.seqTendstoAeSeq hfg
S : ℕ → Set α := fun k => {x | 2⁻¹ ^ k ≤ dist (f (ns k) x) (g x)}
hμS_le : ∀ (k : ℕ), ↑↑μ (S k) ≤ 2⁻¹ ^ k
s : Set α := limsup S atTop
hs : s = limsup S atTop
⊢ ∑' (a : ℕ), 2⁻¹ ^ a < ⊤

Next tactic:
simp only [ENNReal.tsum_geometric, ENNReal.one_sub_inv_two, ENNReal.two_lt_top, inv_inv]
/-- If `f` is a sequence of functions which converges in measure to `g`, then there exists a
subsequence of `f` which converges a.e. to `g`. -/
theorem TendstoInMeasure.exists_seq_tendsto_ae (hfg : TendstoInMeasure μ f atTop g) :
    ∃ ns : ℕ → ℕ, StrictMono ns ∧ ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, Tendsto (fun i => f (ns i) x) atTop (𝓝 (g x)) := by
  /- Since `f` tends to `g` in measure, it has a subsequence `k ↦ f (ns k)` such that
    `μ {|f (ns k) - g| ≥ 2⁻ᵏ} ≤ 2⁻ᵏ` for all `k`. Defining
    `s := ⋂ k, ⋃ i ≥ k, {|f (ns k) - g| ≥ 2⁻ᵏ}`, we see that `μ s = 0` by the
    first Borel-Cantelli lemma.

    On the other hand, as `s` is precisely the set for which `f (ns k)`
    doesn't converge to `g`, `f (ns k)` converges almost everywhere to `g` as required. -/
  have h_lt_ε_real : ∀ (ε : ℝ) (_ : 0 < ε), ∃ k : ℕ, 2 * (2 : ℝ)⁻¹ ^ k < ε := by
    intro ε hε
    obtain ⟨k, h_k⟩ : ∃ k : ℕ, (2 : ℝ)⁻¹ ^ k < ε := exists_pow_lt_of_lt_one hε (by norm_num)
    refine' ⟨k + 1, (le_of_eq _).trans_lt h_k⟩
    rw [pow_add]; ring
  set ns := ExistsSeqTendstoAe.seqTendstoAeSeq hfg
  use ns
  let S := fun k => { x | (2 : ℝ)⁻¹ ^ k ≤ dist (f (ns k) x) (g x) }
  have hμS_le : ∀ k, μ (S k) ≤ (2 : ℝ≥0∞)⁻¹ ^ k :=
    fun k => ExistsSeqTendstoAe.seqTendstoAeSeq_spec hfg k (ns k) le_rfl
  set s := Filter.atTop.limsup S with hs
  have hμs : μ s = 0 := by
    refine' measure_limsup_eq_zero (ne_of_lt <| lt_of_le_of_lt (ENNReal.tsum_le_tsum hμS_le) _)
    simp only [ENNReal.tsum_geometric, ENNReal.one_sub_inv_two, ENNReal.two_lt_top, inv_inv]
  

Proof state:
case h
α : Type u_1
ι : Type u_2
E : Type u_3
m : MeasurableSpace α
μ : Measure α
inst✝ : MetricSpace E
f : ℕ → α → E
g : α → E
hfg : TendstoInMeasure μ f atTop g
h_lt_ε_real : ∀ (ε : ℝ), 0 < ε → ∃ k, 2 * 2⁻¹ ^ k < ε
ns : ℕ → ℕ := ExistsSeqTendstoAe.seqTendstoAeSeq hfg
S : ℕ → Set α := fun k => {x | 2⁻¹ ^ k ≤ dist (f (ns k) x) (g x)}
hμS_le : ∀ (k : ℕ), ↑↑μ (S k) ≤ 2⁻¹ ^ k
s : Set α := limsup S atTop
hs : s = limsup S atTop
hμs : ↑↑μ s = 0
⊢ StrictMono ns ∧ ∀ᵐ (x : α) ∂μ, Tendsto (fun i => f (ns i) x) atTop (𝓝 (g x))

Next tactic:
have h_tendsto : ∀ x ∈ sᶜ, Tendsto (fun i => f (ns i) x) atTop (𝓝 (g x)) := by
    refine' fun x hx => Metric.tendsto_atTop.mpr fun ε hε => _
    rw [hs, limsup_eq_iInf_iSup_of_nat] at hx
    simp only [Set.iSup_eq_iUnion, Set.iInf_eq_iInter, Set.compl_iInter, Set.compl_iUnion,
      Set.mem_iUnion, Set.mem_iInter, Set.mem_compl_iff, Set.mem_setOf_eq, not_le] at hx
    obtain ⟨N, hNx⟩ := hx
    obtain ⟨k, hk_lt_ε⟩ := h_lt_ε_real ε hε
    refine' ⟨max N (k - 1), fun n hn_ge => lt_of_le_of_lt _ hk_lt_ε⟩
    specialize hNx n ((le_max_left _ _).trans hn_ge)
    have h_inv_n_le_k : (2 : ℝ)⁻¹ ^ n ≤ 2 * (2 : ℝ)⁻¹ ^ k := by
      rw [mul_comm, ← inv_mul_le_iff' (zero_lt_two' ℝ)]
      conv_lhs =>
        congr
        rw [← pow_one (2 : ℝ)⁻¹]
      rw [← pow_add, add_comm]
      exact pow_le_pow_of_le_one (one_div (2 : ℝ) ▸ one_half_pos.le) (inv_le_one one_le_two)
        ((le_tsub_add.trans (add_le_add_right (le_max_right _ _) 1)).trans
          (add_le_add_right hn_ge 1))
    exact le_trans hNx.le h_inv_n_le_k