l3lab/ntp-mathlib huggingface dataset:
@[simp]
theorem lTensorHomEquivHomLTensor_apply (x : P ⊗[R] (M →ₗ[R] Q)) :
    lTensorHomEquivHomLTensor R M P Q x = lTensorHomToHomLTensor R M P Q x := by
  

Proof state:
ι : Type w
R : Type u
M : Type v₁
N : Type v₂
P : Type v₃
Q : Type v₄
inst✝¹³ : CommRing R
inst✝¹² : AddCommGroup M
inst✝¹¹ : AddCommGroup N
inst✝¹⁰ : AddCommGroup P
inst✝⁹ : AddCommGroup Q
inst✝⁸ : Module R M
inst✝⁷ : Module R N
inst✝⁶ : Module R P
inst✝⁵ : Module R Q
inst✝⁴ : Free R M
inst✝³ : Module.Finite R M
inst✝² : Free R N
inst✝¹ : Module.Finite R N
inst✝ : Nontrivial R
x : P ⊗[R] (M →ₗ[R] Q)
⊢ (lTensorHomEquivHomLTensor R M P Q) x = (lTensorHomToHomLTensor R M P Q) x

Next tactic:
rw [← LinearEquiv.coe_toLinearMap, lTensorHomEquivHomLTensor_toLinearMap]
@[simp]
theorem rTensorHomEquivHomRTensor_apply (x : (M →ₗ[R] P) ⊗[R] Q) :
    rTensorHomEquivHomRTensor R M P Q x = rTensorHomToHomRTensor R M P Q x := by
  

Proof state:
ι : Type w
R : Type u
M : Type v₁
N : Type v₂
P : Type v₃
Q : Type v₄
inst✝¹³ : CommRing R
inst✝¹² : AddCommGroup M
inst✝¹¹ : AddCommGroup N
inst✝¹⁰ : AddCommGroup P
inst✝⁹ : AddCommGroup Q
inst✝⁸ : Module R M
inst✝⁷ : Module R N
inst✝⁶ : Module R P
inst✝⁵ : Module R Q
inst✝⁴ : Free R M
inst✝³ : Module.Finite R M
inst✝² : Free R N
inst✝¹ : Module.Finite R N
inst✝ : Nontrivial R
x : (M →ₗ[R] P) ⊗[R] Q
⊢ (rTensorHomEquivHomRTensor R M P Q) x = (rTensorHomToHomRTensor R M P Q) x

Next tactic:
rw [← LinearEquiv.coe_toLinearMap, rTensorHomEquivHomRTensor_toLinearMap]
@[simp]
theorem homTensorHomEquiv_toLinearMap :
    (homTensorHomEquiv R M N P Q).toLinearMap = homTensorHomMap R M N P Q := by
  

Proof state:
ι : Type w
R : Type u
M : Type v₁
N : Type v₂
P : Type v₃
Q : Type v₄
inst✝¹³ : CommRing R
inst✝¹² : AddCommGroup M
inst✝¹¹ : AddCommGroup N
inst✝¹⁰ : AddCommGroup P
inst✝⁹ : AddCommGroup Q
inst✝⁸ : Module R M
inst✝⁷ : Module R N
inst✝⁶ : Module R P
inst✝⁵ : Module R Q
inst✝⁴ : Free R M
inst✝³ : Module.Finite R M
inst✝² : Free R N
inst✝¹ : Module.Finite R N
inst✝ : Nontrivial R
⊢ ↑(homTensorHomEquiv R M N P Q) = homTensorHomMap R M N P Q

Next tactic:
ext m n
@[simp]
theorem homTensorHomEquiv_toLinearMap :
    (homTensorHomEquiv R M N P Q).toLinearMap = homTensorHomMap R M N P Q := by
  ext m n
  

Proof state:
case H.h.h.H.h.h
ι : Type w
R : Type u
M : Type v₁
N : Type v₂
P : Type v₃
Q : Type v₄
inst✝¹³ : CommRing R
inst✝¹² : AddCommGroup M
inst✝¹¹ : AddCommGroup N
inst✝¹⁰ : AddCommGroup P
inst✝⁹ : AddCommGroup Q
inst✝⁸ : Module R M
inst✝⁷ : Module R N
inst✝⁶ : Module R P
inst✝⁵ : Module R Q
inst✝⁴ : Free R M
inst✝³ : Module.Finite R M
inst✝² : Free R N
inst✝¹ : Module.Finite R N
inst✝ : Nontrivial R
m : M →ₗ[R] P
n : N →ₗ[R] Q
x✝¹ : M
x✝ : N
⊢ ((compr₂ (TensorProduct.mk R M N)
          (((compr₂ (TensorProduct.mk R (M →ₗ[R] P) (N →ₗ[R] Q)) ↑(homTensorHomEquiv R M N P Q)) m) n))
        x✝¹)
      x✝ =
    ((compr₂ (TensorProduct.mk R M N)
          (((compr₂ (TensorProduct.mk R (M →ₗ[R] P) (N →ₗ[R] Q)) (homTensorHomMap R M N P Q)) m) n))
        x✝¹)
      x✝

Next tactic:
simp only [homTensorHomEquiv, compr₂_apply, mk_apply, LinearEquiv.coe_toLinearMap,
    LinearEquiv.trans_apply, lift.equiv_apply, LinearEquiv.arrowCongr_apply, LinearEquiv.refl_symm,
    LinearEquiv.refl_apply, rTensorHomEquivHomRTensor_apply, lTensorHomEquivHomLTensor_apply,
    lTensorHomToHomLTensor_apply, rTensorHomToHomRTensor_apply, homTensorHomMap_apply,
    map_tmul]
@[simp]
theorem homTensorHomEquiv_apply (x : (M →ₗ[R] P) ⊗[R] (N →ₗ[R] Q)) :
    homTensorHomEquiv R M N P Q x = homTensorHomMap R M N P Q x := by
  

Proof state:
ι : Type w
R : Type u
M : Type v₁
N : Type v₂
P : Type v₃
Q : Type v₄
inst✝¹³ : CommRing R
inst✝¹² : AddCommGroup M
inst✝¹¹ : AddCommGroup N
inst✝¹⁰ : AddCommGroup P
inst✝⁹ : AddCommGroup Q
inst✝⁸ : Module R M
inst✝⁷ : Module R N
inst✝⁶ : Module R P
inst✝⁵ : Module R Q
inst✝⁴ : Free R M
inst✝³ : Module.Finite R M
inst✝² : Free R N
inst✝¹ : Module.Finite R N
inst✝ : Nontrivial R
x : (M →ₗ[R] P) ⊗[R] (N →ₗ[R] Q)
⊢ (homTensorHomEquiv R M N P Q) x = (homTensorHomMap R M N P Q) x

Next tactic:
rw [← LinearEquiv.coe_toLinearMap, homTensorHomEquiv_toLinearMap]
theorem hofer {X : Type*} [MetricSpace X] [CompleteSpace X] (x : X) (ε : ℝ) (ε_pos : 0 < ε)
    {ϕ : X → ℝ} (cont : Continuous ϕ) (nonneg : ∀ y, 0 ≤ ϕ y) : ∃ ε' > 0, ∃ x' : X,
    ε' ≤ ε ∧ d x' x ≤ 2 * ε ∧ ε * ϕ x ≤ ε' * ϕ x' ∧ ∀ y, d x' y ≤ ε' → ϕ y ≤ 2 * ϕ x' := by
  

Proof state:
X : Type u_1
inst✝¹ : MetricSpace X
inst✝ : CompleteSpace X
x : X
ε : ℝ
ε_pos : 0 < ε
ϕ : X → ℝ
cont : Continuous ϕ
nonneg : ∀ (y : X), 0 ≤ ϕ y
⊢ ∃ ε' > 0, ∃ x', ε' ≤ ε ∧ d x' x ≤ 2 * ε ∧ ε * ϕ x ≤ ε' * ϕ x' ∧ ∀ (y : X), d x' y ≤ ε' → ϕ y ≤ 2 * ϕ x'

Next tactic:
by_contra H
theorem hofer {X : Type*} [MetricSpace X] [CompleteSpace X] (x : X) (ε : ℝ) (ε_pos : 0 < ε)
    {ϕ : X → ℝ} (cont : Continuous ϕ) (nonneg : ∀ y, 0 ≤ ϕ y) : ∃ ε' > 0, ∃ x' : X,
    ε' ≤ ε ∧ d x' x ≤ 2 * ε ∧ ε * ϕ x ≤ ε' * ϕ x' ∧ ∀ y, d x' y ≤ ε' → ϕ y ≤ 2 * ϕ x' := by
  by_contra H
  

Proof state:
X : Type u_1
inst✝¹ : MetricSpace X
inst✝ : CompleteSpace X
x : X
ε : ℝ
ε_pos : 0 < ε
ϕ : X → ℝ
cont : Continuous ϕ
nonneg : ∀ (y : X), 0 ≤ ϕ y
H : ¬∃ ε' > 0, ∃ x', ε' ≤ ε ∧ d x' x ≤ 2 * ε ∧ ε * ϕ x ≤ ε' * ϕ x' ∧ ∀ (y : X), d x' y ≤ ε' → ϕ y ≤ 2 * ϕ x'
⊢ False

Next tactic:
have reformulation : ∀ (x') (k : ℕ), ε * ϕ x ≤ ε / 2 ^ k * ϕ x' ↔ 2 ^ k * ϕ x ≤ ϕ x' := by
    intro x' k
    rw [div_mul_eq_mul_div, le_div_iff, mul_assoc, mul_le_mul_left ε_pos, mul_comm]
    positivity
theorem hofer {X : Type*} [MetricSpace X] [CompleteSpace X] (x : X) (ε : ℝ) (ε_pos : 0 < ε)
    {ϕ : X → ℝ} (cont : Continuous ϕ) (nonneg : ∀ y, 0 ≤ ϕ y) : ∃ ε' > 0, ∃ x' : X,
    ε' ≤ ε ∧ d x' x ≤ 2 * ε ∧ ε * ϕ x ≤ ε' * ϕ x' ∧ ∀ y, d x' y ≤ ε' → ϕ y ≤ 2 * ϕ x' := by
  by_contra H
  have reformulation : ∀ (x') (k : ℕ), ε * ϕ x ≤ ε / 2 ^ k * ϕ x' ↔ 2 ^ k * ϕ x ≤ ϕ x' := by
    

Proof state:
X : Type u_1
inst✝¹ : MetricSpace X
inst✝ : CompleteSpace X
x : X
ε : ℝ
ε_pos : 0 < ε
ϕ : X → ℝ
cont : Continuous ϕ
nonneg : ∀ (y : X), 0 ≤ ϕ y
H : ¬∃ ε' > 0, ∃ x', ε' ≤ ε ∧ d x' x ≤ 2 * ε ∧ ε * ϕ x ≤ ε' * ϕ x' ∧ ∀ (y : X), d x' y ≤ ε' → ϕ y ≤ 2 * ϕ x'
⊢ ∀ (x' : X) (k : ℕ), ε * ϕ x ≤ ε / 2 ^ k * ϕ x' ↔ 2 ^ k * ϕ x ≤ ϕ x'

Next tactic:
intro x' k
theorem hofer {X : Type*} [MetricSpace X] [CompleteSpace X] (x : X) (ε : ℝ) (ε_pos : 0 < ε)
    {ϕ : X → ℝ} (cont : Continuous ϕ) (nonneg : ∀ y, 0 ≤ ϕ y) : ∃ ε' > 0, ∃ x' : X,
    ε' ≤ ε ∧ d x' x ≤ 2 * ε ∧ ε * ϕ x ≤ ε' * ϕ x' ∧ ∀ y, d x' y ≤ ε' → ϕ y ≤ 2 * ϕ x' := by
  by_contra H
  have reformulation : ∀ (x') (k : ℕ), ε * ϕ x ≤ ε / 2 ^ k * ϕ x' ↔ 2 ^ k * ϕ x ≤ ϕ x' := by
    intro x' k
    

Proof state:
X : Type u_1
inst✝¹ : MetricSpace X
inst✝ : CompleteSpace X
x : X
ε : ℝ
ε_pos : 0 < ε
ϕ : X → ℝ
cont : Continuous ϕ
nonneg : ∀ (y : X), 0 ≤ ϕ y
H : ¬∃ ε' > 0, ∃ x', ε' ≤ ε ∧ d x' x ≤ 2 * ε ∧ ε * ϕ x ≤ ε' * ϕ x' ∧ ∀ (y : X), d x' y ≤ ε' → ϕ y ≤ 2 * ϕ x'
x' : X
k : ℕ
⊢ ε * ϕ x ≤ ε / 2 ^ k * ϕ x' ↔ 2 ^ k * ϕ x ≤ ϕ x'

Next tactic:
rw [div_mul_eq_mul_div, le_div_iff, mul_assoc, mul_le_mul_left ε_pos, mul_comm]
theorem hofer {X : Type*} [MetricSpace X] [CompleteSpace X] (x : X) (ε : ℝ) (ε_pos : 0 < ε)
    {ϕ : X → ℝ} (cont : Continuous ϕ) (nonneg : ∀ y, 0 ≤ ϕ y) : ∃ ε' > 0, ∃ x' : X,
    ε' ≤ ε ∧ d x' x ≤ 2 * ε ∧ ε * ϕ x ≤ ε' * ϕ x' ∧ ∀ y, d x' y ≤ ε' → ϕ y ≤ 2 * ϕ x' := by
  by_contra H
  have reformulation : ∀ (x') (k : ℕ), ε * ϕ x ≤ ε / 2 ^ k * ϕ x' ↔ 2 ^ k * ϕ x ≤ ϕ x' := by
    intro x' k
    rw [div_mul_eq_mul_div, le_div_iff, mul_assoc, mul_le_mul_left ε_pos, mul_comm]
    

Proof state:
X : Type u_1
inst✝¹ : MetricSpace X
inst✝ : CompleteSpace X
x : X
ε : ℝ
ε_pos : 0 < ε
ϕ : X → ℝ
cont : Continuous ϕ
nonneg : ∀ (y : X), 0 ≤ ϕ y
H : ¬∃ ε' > 0, ∃ x', ε' ≤ ε ∧ d x' x ≤ 2 * ε ∧ ε * ϕ x ≤ ε' * ϕ x' ∧ ∀ (y : X), d x' y ≤ ε' → ϕ y ≤ 2 * ϕ x'
x' : X
k : ℕ
⊢ 0 < 2 ^ k

Next tactic:
positivity
theorem hofer {X : Type*} [MetricSpace X] [CompleteSpace X] (x : X) (ε : ℝ) (ε_pos : 0 < ε)
    {ϕ : X → ℝ} (cont : Continuous ϕ) (nonneg : ∀ y, 0 ≤ ϕ y) : ∃ ε' > 0, ∃ x' : X,
    ε' ≤ ε ∧ d x' x ≤ 2 * ε ∧ ε * ϕ x ≤ ε' * ϕ x' ∧ ∀ y, d x' y ≤ ε' → ϕ y ≤ 2 * ϕ x' := by
  by_contra H
  have reformulation : ∀ (x') (k : ℕ), ε * ϕ x ≤ ε / 2 ^ k * ϕ x' ↔ 2 ^ k * ϕ x ≤ ϕ x' := by
    intro x' k
    rw [div_mul_eq_mul_div, le_div_iff, mul_assoc, mul_le_mul_left ε_pos, mul_comm]
    positivity
  -- Now let's specialize to `ε/2^k`
  

Proof state:
X : Type u_1
inst✝¹ : MetricSpace X
inst✝ : CompleteSpace X
x : X
ε : ℝ
ε_pos : 0 < ε
ϕ : X → ℝ
cont : Continuous ϕ
nonneg : ∀ (y : X), 0 ≤ ϕ y
H : ¬∃ ε' > 0, ∃ x', ε' ≤ ε ∧ d x' x ≤ 2 * ε ∧ ε * ϕ x ≤ ε' * ϕ x' ∧ ∀ (y : X), d x' y ≤ ε' → ϕ y ≤ 2 * ϕ x'
reformulation : ∀ (x' : X) (k : ℕ), ε * ϕ x ≤ ε / 2 ^ k * ϕ x' ↔ 2 ^ k * ϕ x ≤ ϕ x'
⊢ False

Next tactic:
replace H :
    ∀ k : ℕ, ∀ x', d x' x ≤ 2 * ε ∧ 2 ^ k * ϕ x ≤ ϕ x' → ∃ y, d x' y ≤ ε / 2 ^ k ∧ 2 * ϕ x' < ϕ y
theorem hofer {X : Type*} [MetricSpace X] [CompleteSpace X] (x : X) (ε : ℝ) (ε_pos : 0 < ε)
    {ϕ : X → ℝ} (cont : Continuous ϕ) (nonneg : ∀ y, 0 ≤ ϕ y) : ∃ ε' > 0, ∃ x' : X,
    ε' ≤ ε ∧ d x' x ≤ 2 * ε ∧ ε * ϕ x ≤ ε' * ϕ x' ∧ ∀ y, d x' y ≤ ε' → ϕ y ≤ 2 * ϕ x' := by
  by_contra H
  have reformulation : ∀ (x') (k : ℕ), ε * ϕ x ≤ ε / 2 ^ k * ϕ x' ↔ 2 ^ k * ϕ x ≤ ϕ x' := by
    intro x' k
    rw [div_mul_eq_mul_div, le_div_iff, mul_assoc, mul_le_mul_left ε_pos, mul_comm]
    positivity
  -- Now let's specialize to `ε/2^k`
  replace H :
    ∀ k : ℕ, ∀ x', d x' x ≤ 2 * ε ∧ 2 ^ k * ϕ x ≤ ϕ x' → ∃ y, d x' y ≤ ε / 2 ^ k ∧ 2 * ϕ x' < ϕ y
  · 

Proof state:
case H
X : Type u_1
inst✝¹ : MetricSpace X
inst✝ : CompleteSpace X
x : X
ε : ℝ
ε_pos : 0 < ε
ϕ : X → ℝ
cont : Continuous ϕ
nonneg : ∀ (y : X), 0 ≤ ϕ y
H : ¬∃ ε' > 0, ∃ x', ε' ≤ ε ∧ d x' x ≤ 2 * ε ∧ ε * ϕ x ≤ ε' * ϕ x' ∧ ∀ (y : X), d x' y ≤ ε' → ϕ y ≤ 2 * ϕ x'
reformulation : ∀ (x' : X) (k : ℕ), ε * ϕ x ≤ ε / 2 ^ k * ϕ x' ↔ 2 ^ k * ϕ x ≤ ϕ x'
⊢ ∀ (k : ℕ) (x' : X), d x' x ≤ 2 * ε ∧ 2 ^ k * ϕ x ≤ ϕ x' → ∃ y, d x' y ≤ ε / 2 ^ k ∧ 2 * ϕ x' < ϕ y

Next tactic:
intro k x'
theorem hofer {X : Type*} [MetricSpace X] [CompleteSpace X] (x : X) (ε : ℝ) (ε_pos : 0 < ε)
    {ϕ : X → ℝ} (cont : Continuous ϕ) (nonneg : ∀ y, 0 ≤ ϕ y) : ∃ ε' > 0, ∃ x' : X,
    ε' ≤ ε ∧ d x' x ≤ 2 * ε ∧ ε * ϕ x ≤ ε' * ϕ x' ∧ ∀ y, d x' y ≤ ε' → ϕ y ≤ 2 * ϕ x' := by
  by_contra H
  have reformulation : ∀ (x') (k : ℕ), ε * ϕ x ≤ ε / 2 ^ k * ϕ x' ↔ 2 ^ k * ϕ x ≤ ϕ x' := by
    intro x' k
    rw [div_mul_eq_mul_div, le_div_iff, mul_assoc, mul_le_mul_left ε_pos, mul_comm]
    positivity
  -- Now let's specialize to `ε/2^k`
  replace H :
    ∀ k : ℕ, ∀ x', d x' x ≤ 2 * ε ∧ 2 ^ k * ϕ x ≤ ϕ x' → ∃ y, d x' y ≤ ε / 2 ^ k ∧ 2 * ϕ x' < ϕ y
  · intro k x'
    

Proof state:
case H
X : Type u_1
inst✝¹ : MetricSpace X
inst✝ : CompleteSpace X
x : X
ε : ℝ
ε_pos : 0 < ε
ϕ : X → ℝ
cont : Continuous ϕ
nonneg : ∀ (y : X), 0 ≤ ϕ y
H : ¬∃ ε' > 0, ∃ x', ε' ≤ ε ∧ d x' x ≤ 2 * ε ∧ ε * ϕ x ≤ ε' * ϕ x' ∧ ∀ (y : X), d x' y ≤ ε' → ϕ y ≤ 2 * ϕ x'
reformulation : ∀ (x' : X) (k : ℕ), ε * ϕ x ≤ ε / 2 ^ k * ϕ x' ↔ 2 ^ k * ϕ x ≤ ϕ x'
k : ℕ
x' : X
⊢ d x' x ≤ 2 * ε ∧ 2 ^ k * ϕ x ≤ ϕ x' → ∃ y, d x' y ≤ ε / 2 ^ k ∧ 2 * ϕ x' < ϕ y

Next tactic:
push_neg at H
theorem hofer {X : Type*} [MetricSpace X] [CompleteSpace X] (x : X) (ε : ℝ) (ε_pos : 0 < ε)
    {ϕ : X → ℝ} (cont : Continuous ϕ) (nonneg : ∀ y, 0 ≤ ϕ y) : ∃ ε' > 0, ∃ x' : X,
    ε' ≤ ε ∧ d x' x ≤ 2 * ε ∧ ε * ϕ x ≤ ε' * ϕ x' ∧ ∀ y, d x' y ≤ ε' → ϕ y ≤ 2 * ϕ x' := by
  by_contra H
  have reformulation : ∀ (x') (k : ℕ), ε * ϕ x ≤ ε / 2 ^ k * ϕ x' ↔ 2 ^ k * ϕ x ≤ ϕ x' := by
    intro x' k
    rw [div_mul_eq_mul_div, le_div_iff, mul_assoc, mul_le_mul_left ε_pos, mul_comm]
    positivity
  -- Now let's specialize to `ε/2^k`
  replace H :
    ∀ k : ℕ, ∀ x', d x' x ≤ 2 * ε ∧ 2 ^ k * ϕ x ≤ ϕ x' → ∃ y, d x' y ≤ ε / 2 ^ k ∧ 2 * ϕ x' < ϕ y
  · intro k x'
    push_neg at H
    

Proof state:
case H
X : Type u_1
inst✝¹ : MetricSpace X
inst✝ : CompleteSpace X
x : X
ε : ℝ
ε_pos : 0 < ε
ϕ : X → ℝ
cont : Continuous ϕ
nonneg : ∀ (y : X), 0 ≤ ϕ y
reformulation : ∀ (x' : X) (k : ℕ), ε * ϕ x ≤ ε / 2 ^ k * ϕ x' ↔ 2 ^ k * ϕ x ≤ ϕ x'
k : ℕ
x' : X
H : ∀ ε' > 0, ∀ (x' : X), ε' ≤ ε → d x' x ≤ 2 * ε → ε * ϕ x ≤ ε' * ϕ x' → ∃ y, d x' y ≤ ε' ∧ 2 * ϕ x' < ϕ y
⊢ d x' x ≤ 2 * ε ∧ 2 ^ k * ϕ x ≤ ϕ x' → ∃ y, d x' y ≤ ε / 2 ^ k ∧ 2 * ϕ x' < ϕ y

Next tactic:
have := H (ε / 2 ^ k) (by simp [ε_pos]) x' (by simp [ε_pos.le, one_le_two])
theorem hofer {X : Type*} [MetricSpace X] [CompleteSpace X] (x : X) (ε : ℝ) (ε_pos : 0 < ε)
    {ϕ : X → ℝ} (cont : Continuous ϕ) (nonneg : ∀ y, 0 ≤ ϕ y) : ∃ ε' > 0, ∃ x' : X,
    ε' ≤ ε ∧ d x' x ≤ 2 * ε ∧ ε * ϕ x ≤ ε' * ϕ x' ∧ ∀ y, d x' y ≤ ε' → ϕ y ≤ 2 * ϕ x' := by
  by_contra H
  have reformulation : ∀ (x') (k : ℕ), ε * ϕ x ≤ ε / 2 ^ k * ϕ x' ↔ 2 ^ k * ϕ x ≤ ϕ x' := by
    intro x' k
    rw [div_mul_eq_mul_div, le_div_iff, mul_assoc, mul_le_mul_left ε_pos, mul_comm]
    positivity
  -- Now let's specialize to `ε/2^k`
  replace H :
    ∀ k : ℕ, ∀ x', d x' x ≤ 2 * ε ∧ 2 ^ k * ϕ x ≤ ϕ x' → ∃ y, d x' y ≤ ε / 2 ^ k ∧ 2 * ϕ x' < ϕ y
  · intro k x'
    push_neg at H
    have := H (ε / 2 ^ k) (by 

Proof state:
X : Type u_1
inst✝¹ : MetricSpace X
inst✝ : CompleteSpace X
x : X
ε : ℝ
ε_pos : 0 < ε
ϕ : X → ℝ
cont : Continuous ϕ
nonneg : ∀ (y : X), 0 ≤ ϕ y
reformulation : ∀ (x' : X) (k : ℕ), ε * ϕ x ≤ ε / 2 ^ k * ϕ x' ↔ 2 ^ k * ϕ x ≤ ϕ x'
k : ℕ
x' : X
H : ∀ ε' > 0, ∀ (x' : X), ε' ≤ ε → d x' x ≤ 2 * ε → ε * ϕ x ≤ ε' * ϕ x' → ∃ y, d x' y ≤ ε' ∧ 2 * ϕ x' < ϕ y
⊢ ε / 2 ^ k > 0

Next tactic:
simp [ε_pos]
theorem hofer {X : Type*} [MetricSpace X] [CompleteSpace X] (x : X) (ε : ℝ) (ε_pos : 0 < ε)
    {ϕ : X → ℝ} (cont : Continuous ϕ) (nonneg : ∀ y, 0 ≤ ϕ y) : ∃ ε' > 0, ∃ x' : X,
    ε' ≤ ε ∧ d x' x ≤ 2 * ε ∧ ε * ϕ x ≤ ε' * ϕ x' ∧ ∀ y, d x' y ≤ ε' → ϕ y ≤ 2 * ϕ x' := by
  by_contra H
  have reformulation : ∀ (x') (k : ℕ), ε * ϕ x ≤ ε / 2 ^ k * ϕ x' ↔ 2 ^ k * ϕ x ≤ ϕ x' := by
    intro x' k
    rw [div_mul_eq_mul_div, le_div_iff, mul_assoc, mul_le_mul_left ε_pos, mul_comm]
    positivity
  -- Now let's specialize to `ε/2^k`
  replace H :
    ∀ k : ℕ, ∀ x', d x' x ≤ 2 * ε ∧ 2 ^ k * ϕ x ≤ ϕ x' → ∃ y, d x' y ≤ ε / 2 ^ k ∧ 2 * ϕ x' < ϕ y
  · intro k x'
    push_neg at H
    have := H (ε / 2 ^ k) (by simp [ε_pos]) x' (by 

Proof state:
X : Type u_1
inst✝¹ : MetricSpace X
inst✝ : CompleteSpace X
x : X
ε : ℝ
ε_pos : 0 < ε
ϕ : X → ℝ
cont : Continuous ϕ
nonneg : ∀ (y : X), 0 ≤ ϕ y
reformulation : ∀ (x' : X) (k : ℕ), ε * ϕ x ≤ ε / 2 ^ k * ϕ x' ↔ 2 ^ k * ϕ x ≤ ϕ x'
k : ℕ
x' : X
H : ∀ ε' > 0, ∀ (x' : X), ε' ≤ ε → d x' x ≤ 2 * ε → ε * ϕ x ≤ ε' * ϕ x' → ∃ y, d x' y ≤ ε' ∧ 2 * ϕ x' < ϕ y
⊢ ε / 2 ^ k ≤ ε

Next tactic:
simp [ε_pos.le, one_le_two]
theorem hofer {X : Type*} [MetricSpace X] [CompleteSpace X] (x : X) (ε : ℝ) (ε_pos : 0 < ε)
    {ϕ : X → ℝ} (cont : Continuous ϕ) (nonneg : ∀ y, 0 ≤ ϕ y) : ∃ ε' > 0, ∃ x' : X,
    ε' ≤ ε ∧ d x' x ≤ 2 * ε ∧ ε * ϕ x ≤ ε' * ϕ x' ∧ ∀ y, d x' y ≤ ε' → ϕ y ≤ 2 * ϕ x' := by
  by_contra H
  have reformulation : ∀ (x') (k : ℕ), ε * ϕ x ≤ ε / 2 ^ k * ϕ x' ↔ 2 ^ k * ϕ x ≤ ϕ x' := by
    intro x' k
    rw [div_mul_eq_mul_div, le_div_iff, mul_assoc, mul_le_mul_left ε_pos, mul_comm]
    positivity
  -- Now let's specialize to `ε/2^k`
  replace H :
    ∀ k : ℕ, ∀ x', d x' x ≤ 2 * ε ∧ 2 ^ k * ϕ x ≤ ϕ x' → ∃ y, d x' y ≤ ε / 2 ^ k ∧ 2 * ϕ x' < ϕ y
  · intro k x'
    push_neg at H
    have := H (ε / 2 ^ k) (by simp [ε_pos]) x' (by simp [ε_pos.le, one_le_two])
    

Proof state:
case H
X : Type u_1
inst✝¹ : MetricSpace X
inst✝ : CompleteSpace X
x : X
ε : ℝ
ε_pos : 0 < ε
ϕ : X → ℝ
cont : Continuous ϕ
nonneg : ∀ (y : X), 0 ≤ ϕ y
reformulation : ∀ (x' : X) (k : ℕ), ε * ϕ x ≤ ε / 2 ^ k * ϕ x' ↔ 2 ^ k * ϕ x ≤ ϕ x'
k : ℕ
x' : X
H : ∀ ε' > 0, ∀ (x' : X), ε' ≤ ε → d x' x ≤ 2 * ε → ε * ϕ x ≤ ε' * ϕ x' → ∃ y, d x' y ≤ ε' ∧ 2 * ϕ x' < ϕ y
this : d x' x ≤ 2 * ε → ε * ϕ x ≤ ε / 2 ^ k * ϕ x' → ∃ y, d x' y ≤ ε / 2 ^ k ∧ 2 * ϕ x' < ϕ y
⊢ d x' x ≤ 2 * ε ∧ 2 ^ k * ϕ x ≤ ϕ x' → ∃ y, d x' y ≤ ε / 2 ^ k ∧ 2 * ϕ x' < ϕ y

Next tactic:
simpa [reformulation] using this
theorem hofer {X : Type*} [MetricSpace X] [CompleteSpace X] (x : X) (ε : ℝ) (ε_pos : 0 < ε)
    {ϕ : X → ℝ} (cont : Continuous ϕ) (nonneg : ∀ y, 0 ≤ ϕ y) : ∃ ε' > 0, ∃ x' : X,
    ε' ≤ ε ∧ d x' x ≤ 2 * ε ∧ ε * ϕ x ≤ ε' * ϕ x' ∧ ∀ y, d x' y ≤ ε' → ϕ y ≤ 2 * ϕ x' := by
  by_contra H
  have reformulation : ∀ (x') (k : ℕ), ε * ϕ x ≤ ε / 2 ^ k * ϕ x' ↔ 2 ^ k * ϕ x ≤ ϕ x' := by
    intro x' k
    rw [div_mul_eq_mul_div, le_div_iff, mul_assoc, mul_le_mul_left ε_pos, mul_comm]
    positivity
  -- Now let's specialize to `ε/2^k`
  replace H :
    ∀ k : ℕ, ∀ x', d x' x ≤ 2 * ε ∧ 2 ^ k * ϕ x ≤ ϕ x' → ∃ y, d x' y ≤ ε / 2 ^ k ∧ 2 * ϕ x' < ϕ y
  · intro k x'
    push_neg at H
    have := H (ε / 2 ^ k) (by simp [ε_pos]) x' (by simp [ε_pos.le, one_le_two])
    simpa [reformulation] using this
  

Proof state:
X : Type u_1
inst✝¹ : MetricSpace X
inst✝ : CompleteSpace X
x : X
ε : ℝ
ε_pos : 0 < ε
ϕ : X → ℝ
cont : Continuous ϕ
nonneg : ∀ (y : X), 0 ≤ ϕ y
reformulation : ∀ (x' : X) (k : ℕ), ε * ϕ x ≤ ε / 2 ^ k * ϕ x' ↔ 2 ^ k * ϕ x ≤ ϕ x'
H : ∀ (k : ℕ) (x' : X), d x' x ≤ 2 * ε ∧ 2 ^ k * ϕ x ≤ ϕ x' → ∃ y, d x' y ≤ ε / 2 ^ k ∧ 2 * ϕ x' < ϕ y
⊢ False

Next tactic:
clear reformulation
theorem hofer {X : Type*} [MetricSpace X] [CompleteSpace X] (x : X) (ε : ℝ) (ε_pos : 0 < ε)
    {ϕ : X → ℝ} (cont : Continuous ϕ) (nonneg : ∀ y, 0 ≤ ϕ y) : ∃ ε' > 0, ∃ x' : X,
    ε' ≤ ε ∧ d x' x ≤ 2 * ε ∧ ε * ϕ x ≤ ε' * ϕ x' ∧ ∀ y, d x' y ≤ ε' → ϕ y ≤ 2 * ϕ x' := by
  by_contra H
  have reformulation : ∀ (x') (k : ℕ), ε * ϕ x ≤ ε / 2 ^ k * ϕ x' ↔ 2 ^ k * ϕ x ≤ ϕ x' := by
    intro x' k
    rw [div_mul_eq_mul_div, le_div_iff, mul_assoc, mul_le_mul_left ε_pos, mul_comm]
    positivity
  -- Now let's specialize to `ε/2^k`
  replace H :
    ∀ k : ℕ, ∀ x', d x' x ≤ 2 * ε ∧ 2 ^ k * ϕ x ≤ ϕ x' → ∃ y, d x' y ≤ ε / 2 ^ k ∧ 2 * ϕ x' < ϕ y
  · intro k x'
    push_neg at H
    have := H (ε / 2 ^ k) (by simp [ε_pos]) x' (by simp [ε_pos.le, one_le_two])
    simpa [reformulation] using this
  clear reformulation
  

Proof state:
X : Type u_1
inst✝¹ : MetricSpace X
inst✝ : CompleteSpace X
x : X
ε : ℝ
ε_pos : 0 < ε
ϕ : X → ℝ
cont : Continuous ϕ
nonneg : ∀ (y : X), 0 ≤ ϕ y
H : ∀ (k : ℕ) (x' : X), d x' x ≤ 2 * ε ∧ 2 ^ k * ϕ x ≤ ϕ x' → ∃ y, d x' y ≤ ε / 2 ^ k ∧ 2 * ϕ x' < ϕ y
⊢ False

Next tactic:
haveI : Nonempty X := ⟨x⟩
theorem hofer {X : Type*} [MetricSpace X] [CompleteSpace X] (x : X) (ε : ℝ) (ε_pos : 0 < ε)
    {ϕ : X → ℝ} (cont : Continuous ϕ) (nonneg : ∀ y, 0 ≤ ϕ y) : ∃ ε' > 0, ∃ x' : X,
    ε' ≤ ε ∧ d x' x ≤ 2 * ε ∧ ε * ϕ x ≤ ε' * ϕ x' ∧ ∀ y, d x' y ≤ ε' → ϕ y ≤ 2 * ϕ x' := by
  by_contra H
  have reformulation : ∀ (x') (k : ℕ), ε * ϕ x ≤ ε / 2 ^ k * ϕ x' ↔ 2 ^ k * ϕ x ≤ ϕ x' := by
    intro x' k
    rw [div_mul_eq_mul_div, le_div_iff, mul_assoc, mul_le_mul_left ε_pos, mul_comm]
    positivity
  -- Now let's specialize to `ε/2^k`
  replace H :
    ∀ k : ℕ, ∀ x', d x' x ≤ 2 * ε ∧ 2 ^ k * ϕ x ≤ ϕ x' → ∃ y, d x' y ≤ ε / 2 ^ k ∧ 2 * ϕ x' < ϕ y
  · intro k x'
    push_neg at H
    have := H (ε / 2 ^ k) (by simp [ε_pos]) x' (by simp [ε_pos.le, one_le_two])
    simpa [reformulation] using this
  clear reformulation
  haveI : Nonempty X := ⟨x⟩
  

Proof state:
X : Type u_1
inst✝¹ : MetricSpace X
inst✝ : CompleteSpace X
x : X
ε : ℝ
ε_pos : 0 < ε
ϕ : X → ℝ
cont : Continuous ϕ
nonneg : ∀ (y : X), 0 ≤ ϕ y
H : ∀ (k : ℕ) (x' : X), d x' x ≤ 2 * ε ∧ 2 ^ k * ϕ x ≤ ϕ x' → ∃ y, d x' y ≤ ε / 2 ^ k ∧ 2 * ϕ x' < ϕ y
this : Nonempty X
⊢ False

Next tactic:
choose! F hF using H
theorem hofer {X : Type*} [MetricSpace X] [CompleteSpace X] (x : X) (ε : ℝ) (ε_pos : 0 < ε)
    {ϕ : X → ℝ} (cont : Continuous ϕ) (nonneg : ∀ y, 0 ≤ ϕ y) : ∃ ε' > 0, ∃ x' : X,
    ε' ≤ ε ∧ d x' x ≤ 2 * ε ∧ ε * ϕ x ≤ ε' * ϕ x' ∧ ∀ y, d x' y ≤ ε' → ϕ y ≤ 2 * ϕ x' := by
  by_contra H
  have reformulation : ∀ (x') (k : ℕ), ε * ϕ x ≤ ε / 2 ^ k * ϕ x' ↔ 2 ^ k * ϕ x ≤ ϕ x' := by
    intro x' k
    rw [div_mul_eq_mul_div, le_div_iff, mul_assoc, mul_le_mul_left ε_pos, mul_comm]
    positivity
  -- Now let's specialize to `ε/2^k`
  replace H :
    ∀ k : ℕ, ∀ x', d x' x ≤ 2 * ε ∧ 2 ^ k * ϕ x ≤ ϕ x' → ∃ y, d x' y ≤ ε / 2 ^ k ∧ 2 * ϕ x' < ϕ y
  · intro k x'
    push_neg at H
    have := H (ε / 2 ^ k) (by simp [ε_pos]) x' (by simp [ε_pos.le, one_le_two])
    simpa [reformulation] using this
  clear reformulation
  haveI : Nonempty X := ⟨x⟩
  choose! F hF using H
  -- Use the axiom of choice
  -- Now define u by induction starting at x, with u_{n+1} = F(n, u_n)
  

Proof state:
X : Type u_1
inst✝¹ : MetricSpace X
inst✝ : CompleteSpace X
x : X
ε : ℝ
ε_pos : 0 < ε
ϕ : X → ℝ
cont : Continuous ϕ
nonneg : ∀ (y : X), 0 ≤ ϕ y
this : Nonempty X
F : ℕ → X → X
hF : ∀ (k : ℕ) (x' : X), d x' x ≤ 2 * ε ∧ 2 ^ k * ϕ x ≤ ϕ x' → d x' (F k x') ≤ ε / 2 ^ k ∧ 2 * ϕ x' < ϕ (F k x')
⊢ False

Next tactic:
let u : ℕ → X := fun n => Nat.recOn n x F
theorem hofer {X : Type*} [MetricSpace X] [CompleteSpace X] (x : X) (ε : ℝ) (ε_pos : 0 < ε)
    {ϕ : X → ℝ} (cont : Continuous ϕ) (nonneg : ∀ y, 0 ≤ ϕ y) : ∃ ε' > 0, ∃ x' : X,
    ε' ≤ ε ∧ d x' x ≤ 2 * ε ∧ ε * ϕ x ≤ ε' * ϕ x' ∧ ∀ y, d x' y ≤ ε' → ϕ y ≤ 2 * ϕ x' := by
  by_contra H
  have reformulation : ∀ (x') (k : ℕ), ε * ϕ x ≤ ε / 2 ^ k * ϕ x' ↔ 2 ^ k * ϕ x ≤ ϕ x' := by
    intro x' k
    rw [div_mul_eq_mul_div, le_div_iff, mul_assoc, mul_le_mul_left ε_pos, mul_comm]
    positivity
  -- Now let's specialize to `ε/2^k`
  replace H :
    ∀ k : ℕ, ∀ x', d x' x ≤ 2 * ε ∧ 2 ^ k * ϕ x ≤ ϕ x' → ∃ y, d x' y ≤ ε / 2 ^ k ∧ 2 * ϕ x' < ϕ y
  · intro k x'
    push_neg at H
    have := H (ε / 2 ^ k) (by simp [ε_pos]) x' (by simp [ε_pos.le, one_le_two])
    simpa [reformulation] using this
  clear reformulation
  haveI : Nonempty X := ⟨x⟩
  choose! F hF using H
  -- Use the axiom of choice
  -- Now define u by induction starting at x, with u_{n+1} = F(n, u_n)
  let u : ℕ → X := fun n => Nat.recOn n x F
  -- The properties of F translate to properties of u
  

Proof state:
X : Type u_1
inst✝¹ : MetricSpace X
inst✝ : CompleteSpace X
x : X
ε : ℝ
ε_pos : 0 < ε
ϕ : X → ℝ
cont : Continuous ϕ
nonneg : ∀ (y : X), 0 ≤ ϕ y
this : Nonempty X
F : ℕ → X → X
hF : ∀ (k : ℕ) (x' : X), d x' x ≤ 2 * ε ∧ 2 ^ k * ϕ x ≤ ϕ x' → d x' (F k x') ≤ ε / 2 ^ k ∧ 2 * ϕ x' < ϕ (F k x')
u : ℕ → X := fun n => Nat.recOn n x F
⊢ False

Next tactic:
have hu :
    ∀ n,
      d (u n) x ≤ 2 * ε ∧ 2 ^ n * ϕ x ≤ ϕ (u n) →
        d (u n) (u <| n + 1) ≤ ε / 2 ^ n ∧ 2 * ϕ (u n) < ϕ (u <| n + 1) := by
    intro n
    exact hF n (u n)
theorem hofer {X : Type*} [MetricSpace X] [CompleteSpace X] (x : X) (ε : ℝ) (ε_pos : 0 < ε)
    {ϕ : X → ℝ} (cont : Continuous ϕ) (nonneg : ∀ y, 0 ≤ ϕ y) : ∃ ε' > 0, ∃ x' : X,
    ε' ≤ ε ∧ d x' x ≤ 2 * ε ∧ ε * ϕ x ≤ ε' * ϕ x' ∧ ∀ y, d x' y ≤ ε' → ϕ y ≤ 2 * ϕ x' := by
  by_contra H
  have reformulation : ∀ (x') (k : ℕ), ε * ϕ x ≤ ε / 2 ^ k * ϕ x' ↔ 2 ^ k * ϕ x ≤ ϕ x' := by
    intro x' k
    rw [div_mul_eq_mul_div, le_div_iff, mul_assoc, mul_le_mul_left ε_pos, mul_comm]
    positivity
  -- Now let's specialize to `ε/2^k`
  replace H :
    ∀ k : ℕ, ∀ x', d x' x ≤ 2 * ε ∧ 2 ^ k * ϕ x ≤ ϕ x' → ∃ y, d x' y ≤ ε / 2 ^ k ∧ 2 * ϕ x' < ϕ y
  · intro k x'
    push_neg at H
    have := H (ε / 2 ^ k) (by simp [ε_pos]) x' (by simp [ε_pos.le, one_le_two])
    simpa [reformulation] using this
  clear reformulation
  haveI : Nonempty X := ⟨x⟩
  choose! F hF using H
  -- Use the axiom of choice
  -- Now define u by induction starting at x, with u_{n+1} = F(n, u_n)
  let u : ℕ → X := fun n => Nat.recOn n x F
  -- The properties of F translate to properties of u
  have hu :
    ∀ n,
      d (u n) x ≤ 2 * ε ∧ 2 ^ n * ϕ x ≤ ϕ (u n) →
        d (u n) (u <| n + 1) ≤ ε / 2 ^ n ∧ 2 * ϕ (u n) < ϕ (u <| n + 1) := by
    

Proof state:
X : Type u_1
inst✝¹ : MetricSpace X
inst✝ : CompleteSpace X
x : X
ε : ℝ
ε_pos : 0 < ε
ϕ : X → ℝ
cont : Continuous ϕ
nonneg : ∀ (y : X), 0 ≤ ϕ y
this : Nonempty X
F : ℕ → X → X
hF : ∀ (k : ℕ) (x' : X), d x' x ≤ 2 * ε ∧ 2 ^ k * ϕ x ≤ ϕ x' → d x' (F k x') ≤ ε / 2 ^ k ∧ 2 * ϕ x' < ϕ (F k x')
u : ℕ → X := fun n => Nat.recOn n x F
⊢ ∀ (n : ℕ), d (u n) x ≤ 2 * ε ∧ 2 ^ n * ϕ x ≤ ϕ (u n) → d (u n) (u (n + 1)) ≤ ε / 2 ^ n ∧ 2 * ϕ (u n) < ϕ (u (n + 1))

Next tactic:
intro n