l3lab/ntp-mathlib huggingface dataset:
theorem exists_normalized_aux1 {N : ℕ} {τ : ℝ} (a : SatelliteConfig E N τ)
    (lastr : a.r (last N) = 1) (hτ : 1 ≤ τ) (δ : ℝ) (hδ1 : τ ≤ 1 + δ / 4) (hδ2 : δ ≤ 1)
    (i j : Fin N.succ) (inej : i ≠ j) : 1 - δ ≤ ‖a.c i - a.c j‖ := by
  have ah :
      ∀ i j, i ≠ j → a.r i ≤ ‖a.c i - a.c j‖ ∧ a.r j ≤ τ * a.r i ∨
        a.r j ≤ ‖a.c j - a.c i‖ ∧ a.r i ≤ τ * a.r j := by
    simpa only [dist_eq_norm] using a.h
  have δnonneg : 0 ≤ δ := by linarith only [hτ, hδ1]
  have D : 0 ≤ 1 - δ / 4 := by linarith only [hδ2]
  have τpos : 0 < τ := _root_.zero_lt_one.trans_le hτ
  have I : (1 - δ / 4) * τ ≤ 1 :=
    calc
      (1 - δ / 4) * τ ≤ (1 - δ / 4) * (1 + δ / 4) := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left hδ1 D
      _ = (1 : ℝ) - δ ^ 2 / 16 := by ring
      _ ≤ 1 := by linarith only [sq_nonneg δ]
  have J : 1 - δ ≤ 1 - δ / 4 := by linarith only [δnonneg]
  

Proof state:
E : Type u_1
inst✝ : NormedAddCommGroup E
N : ℕ
τ : ℝ
a : SatelliteConfig E N τ
lastr : r a (last N) = 1
hτ : 1 ≤ τ
δ : ℝ
hδ1 : τ ≤ 1 + δ / 4
hδ2 : δ ≤ 1
i j : Fin (Nat.succ N)
inej : i ≠ j
ah :
  ∀ (i j : Fin (Nat.succ N)),
    i ≠ j → r a i ≤ ‖c a i - c a j‖ ∧ r a j ≤ τ * r a i ∨ r a j ≤ ‖c a j - c a i‖ ∧ r a i ≤ τ * r a j
δnonneg : 0 ≤ δ
D : 0 ≤ 1 - δ / 4
τpos : 0 < τ
I : (1 - δ / 4) * τ ≤ 1
J : 1 - δ ≤ 1 - δ / 4
⊢ 1 - δ ≤ ‖c a i - c a j‖

Next tactic:
have K : 1 - δ / 4 ≤ τ⁻¹ := by rw [inv_eq_one_div, le_div_iff τpos]; exact I
theorem exists_normalized_aux1 {N : ℕ} {τ : ℝ} (a : SatelliteConfig E N τ)
    (lastr : a.r (last N) = 1) (hτ : 1 ≤ τ) (δ : ℝ) (hδ1 : τ ≤ 1 + δ / 4) (hδ2 : δ ≤ 1)
    (i j : Fin N.succ) (inej : i ≠ j) : 1 - δ ≤ ‖a.c i - a.c j‖ := by
  have ah :
      ∀ i j, i ≠ j → a.r i ≤ ‖a.c i - a.c j‖ ∧ a.r j ≤ τ * a.r i ∨
        a.r j ≤ ‖a.c j - a.c i‖ ∧ a.r i ≤ τ * a.r j := by
    simpa only [dist_eq_norm] using a.h
  have δnonneg : 0 ≤ δ := by linarith only [hτ, hδ1]
  have D : 0 ≤ 1 - δ / 4 := by linarith only [hδ2]
  have τpos : 0 < τ := _root_.zero_lt_one.trans_le hτ
  have I : (1 - δ / 4) * τ ≤ 1 :=
    calc
      (1 - δ / 4) * τ ≤ (1 - δ / 4) * (1 + δ / 4) := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left hδ1 D
      _ = (1 : ℝ) - δ ^ 2 / 16 := by ring
      _ ≤ 1 := by linarith only [sq_nonneg δ]
  have J : 1 - δ ≤ 1 - δ / 4 := by linarith only [δnonneg]
  have K : 1 - δ / 4 ≤ τ⁻¹ := by 

Proof state:
E : Type u_1
inst✝ : NormedAddCommGroup E
N : ℕ
τ : ℝ
a : SatelliteConfig E N τ
lastr : r a (last N) = 1
hτ : 1 ≤ τ
δ : ℝ
hδ1 : τ ≤ 1 + δ / 4
hδ2 : δ ≤ 1
i j : Fin (Nat.succ N)
inej : i ≠ j
ah :
  ∀ (i j : Fin (Nat.succ N)),
    i ≠ j → r a i ≤ ‖c a i - c a j‖ ∧ r a j ≤ τ * r a i ∨ r a j ≤ ‖c a j - c a i‖ ∧ r a i ≤ τ * r a j
δnonneg : 0 ≤ δ
D : 0 ≤ 1 - δ / 4
τpos : 0 < τ
I : (1 - δ / 4) * τ ≤ 1
J : 1 - δ ≤ 1 - δ / 4
⊢ 1 - δ / 4 ≤ τ⁻¹

Next tactic:
rw [inv_eq_one_div, le_div_iff τpos]
theorem exists_normalized_aux1 {N : ℕ} {τ : ℝ} (a : SatelliteConfig E N τ)
    (lastr : a.r (last N) = 1) (hτ : 1 ≤ τ) (δ : ℝ) (hδ1 : τ ≤ 1 + δ / 4) (hδ2 : δ ≤ 1)
    (i j : Fin N.succ) (inej : i ≠ j) : 1 - δ ≤ ‖a.c i - a.c j‖ := by
  have ah :
      ∀ i j, i ≠ j → a.r i ≤ ‖a.c i - a.c j‖ ∧ a.r j ≤ τ * a.r i ∨
        a.r j ≤ ‖a.c j - a.c i‖ ∧ a.r i ≤ τ * a.r j := by
    simpa only [dist_eq_norm] using a.h
  have δnonneg : 0 ≤ δ := by linarith only [hτ, hδ1]
  have D : 0 ≤ 1 - δ / 4 := by linarith only [hδ2]
  have τpos : 0 < τ := _root_.zero_lt_one.trans_le hτ
  have I : (1 - δ / 4) * τ ≤ 1 :=
    calc
      (1 - δ / 4) * τ ≤ (1 - δ / 4) * (1 + δ / 4) := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left hδ1 D
      _ = (1 : ℝ) - δ ^ 2 / 16 := by ring
      _ ≤ 1 := by linarith only [sq_nonneg δ]
  have J : 1 - δ ≤ 1 - δ / 4 := by linarith only [δnonneg]
  have K : 1 - δ / 4 ≤ τ⁻¹ := by rw [inv_eq_one_div, le_div_iff τpos]; 

Proof state:
E : Type u_1
inst✝ : NormedAddCommGroup E
N : ℕ
τ : ℝ
a : SatelliteConfig E N τ
lastr : r a (last N) = 1
hτ : 1 ≤ τ
δ : ℝ
hδ1 : τ ≤ 1 + δ / 4
hδ2 : δ ≤ 1
i j : Fin (Nat.succ N)
inej : i ≠ j
ah :
  ∀ (i j : Fin (Nat.succ N)),
    i ≠ j → r a i ≤ ‖c a i - c a j‖ ∧ r a j ≤ τ * r a i ∨ r a j ≤ ‖c a j - c a i‖ ∧ r a i ≤ τ * r a j
δnonneg : 0 ≤ δ
D : 0 ≤ 1 - δ / 4
τpos : 0 < τ
I : (1 - δ / 4) * τ ≤ 1
J : 1 - δ ≤ 1 - δ / 4
⊢ (1 - δ / 4) * τ ≤ 1

Next tactic:
exact I
theorem exists_normalized_aux1 {N : ℕ} {τ : ℝ} (a : SatelliteConfig E N τ)
    (lastr : a.r (last N) = 1) (hτ : 1 ≤ τ) (δ : ℝ) (hδ1 : τ ≤ 1 + δ / 4) (hδ2 : δ ≤ 1)
    (i j : Fin N.succ) (inej : i ≠ j) : 1 - δ ≤ ‖a.c i - a.c j‖ := by
  have ah :
      ∀ i j, i ≠ j → a.r i ≤ ‖a.c i - a.c j‖ ∧ a.r j ≤ τ * a.r i ∨
        a.r j ≤ ‖a.c j - a.c i‖ ∧ a.r i ≤ τ * a.r j := by
    simpa only [dist_eq_norm] using a.h
  have δnonneg : 0 ≤ δ := by linarith only [hτ, hδ1]
  have D : 0 ≤ 1 - δ / 4 := by linarith only [hδ2]
  have τpos : 0 < τ := _root_.zero_lt_one.trans_le hτ
  have I : (1 - δ / 4) * τ ≤ 1 :=
    calc
      (1 - δ / 4) * τ ≤ (1 - δ / 4) * (1 + δ / 4) := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left hδ1 D
      _ = (1 : ℝ) - δ ^ 2 / 16 := by ring
      _ ≤ 1 := by linarith only [sq_nonneg δ]
  have J : 1 - δ ≤ 1 - δ / 4 := by linarith only [δnonneg]
  have K : 1 - δ / 4 ≤ τ⁻¹ := by rw [inv_eq_one_div, le_div_iff τpos]; exact I
  

Proof state:
E : Type u_1
inst✝ : NormedAddCommGroup E
N : ℕ
τ : ℝ
a : SatelliteConfig E N τ
lastr : r a (last N) = 1
hτ : 1 ≤ τ
δ : ℝ
hδ1 : τ ≤ 1 + δ / 4
hδ2 : δ ≤ 1
i j : Fin (Nat.succ N)
inej : i ≠ j
ah :
  ∀ (i j : Fin (Nat.succ N)),
    i ≠ j → r a i ≤ ‖c a i - c a j‖ ∧ r a j ≤ τ * r a i ∨ r a j ≤ ‖c a j - c a i‖ ∧ r a i ≤ τ * r a j
δnonneg : 0 ≤ δ
D : 0 ≤ 1 - δ / 4
τpos : 0 < τ
I : (1 - δ / 4) * τ ≤ 1
J : 1 - δ ≤ 1 - δ / 4
K : 1 - δ / 4 ≤ τ⁻¹
⊢ 1 - δ ≤ ‖c a i - c a j‖

Next tactic:
suffices L : τ⁻¹ ≤ ‖a.c i - a.c j‖
theorem exists_normalized_aux1 {N : ℕ} {τ : ℝ} (a : SatelliteConfig E N τ)
    (lastr : a.r (last N) = 1) (hτ : 1 ≤ τ) (δ : ℝ) (hδ1 : τ ≤ 1 + δ / 4) (hδ2 : δ ≤ 1)
    (i j : Fin N.succ) (inej : i ≠ j) : 1 - δ ≤ ‖a.c i - a.c j‖ := by
  have ah :
      ∀ i j, i ≠ j → a.r i ≤ ‖a.c i - a.c j‖ ∧ a.r j ≤ τ * a.r i ∨
        a.r j ≤ ‖a.c j - a.c i‖ ∧ a.r i ≤ τ * a.r j := by
    simpa only [dist_eq_norm] using a.h
  have δnonneg : 0 ≤ δ := by linarith only [hτ, hδ1]
  have D : 0 ≤ 1 - δ / 4 := by linarith only [hδ2]
  have τpos : 0 < τ := _root_.zero_lt_one.trans_le hτ
  have I : (1 - δ / 4) * τ ≤ 1 :=
    calc
      (1 - δ / 4) * τ ≤ (1 - δ / 4) * (1 + δ / 4) := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left hδ1 D
      _ = (1 : ℝ) - δ ^ 2 / 16 := by ring
      _ ≤ 1 := by linarith only [sq_nonneg δ]
  have J : 1 - δ ≤ 1 - δ / 4 := by linarith only [δnonneg]
  have K : 1 - δ / 4 ≤ τ⁻¹ := by rw [inv_eq_one_div, le_div_iff τpos]; exact I
  suffices L : τ⁻¹ ≤ ‖a.c i - a.c j‖; · 

Proof state:
E : Type u_1
inst✝ : NormedAddCommGroup E
N : ℕ
τ : ℝ
a : SatelliteConfig E N τ
lastr : r a (last N) = 1
hτ : 1 ≤ τ
δ : ℝ
hδ1 : τ ≤ 1 + δ / 4
hδ2 : δ ≤ 1
i j : Fin (Nat.succ N)
inej : i ≠ j
ah :
  ∀ (i j : Fin (Nat.succ N)),
    i ≠ j → r a i ≤ ‖c a i - c a j‖ ∧ r a j ≤ τ * r a i ∨ r a j ≤ ‖c a j - c a i‖ ∧ r a i ≤ τ * r a j
δnonneg : 0 ≤ δ
D : 0 ≤ 1 - δ / 4
τpos : 0 < τ
I : (1 - δ / 4) * τ ≤ 1
J : 1 - δ ≤ 1 - δ / 4
K : 1 - δ / 4 ≤ τ⁻¹
L : τ⁻¹ ≤ ‖c a i - c a j‖
⊢ 1 - δ ≤ ‖c a i - c a j‖

Next tactic:
linarith only [J, K, L]
theorem exists_normalized_aux1 {N : ℕ} {τ : ℝ} (a : SatelliteConfig E N τ)
    (lastr : a.r (last N) = 1) (hτ : 1 ≤ τ) (δ : ℝ) (hδ1 : τ ≤ 1 + δ / 4) (hδ2 : δ ≤ 1)
    (i j : Fin N.succ) (inej : i ≠ j) : 1 - δ ≤ ‖a.c i - a.c j‖ := by
  have ah :
      ∀ i j, i ≠ j → a.r i ≤ ‖a.c i - a.c j‖ ∧ a.r j ≤ τ * a.r i ∨
        a.r j ≤ ‖a.c j - a.c i‖ ∧ a.r i ≤ τ * a.r j := by
    simpa only [dist_eq_norm] using a.h
  have δnonneg : 0 ≤ δ := by linarith only [hτ, hδ1]
  have D : 0 ≤ 1 - δ / 4 := by linarith only [hδ2]
  have τpos : 0 < τ := _root_.zero_lt_one.trans_le hτ
  have I : (1 - δ / 4) * τ ≤ 1 :=
    calc
      (1 - δ / 4) * τ ≤ (1 - δ / 4) * (1 + δ / 4) := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left hδ1 D
      _ = (1 : ℝ) - δ ^ 2 / 16 := by ring
      _ ≤ 1 := by linarith only [sq_nonneg δ]
  have J : 1 - δ ≤ 1 - δ / 4 := by linarith only [δnonneg]
  have K : 1 - δ / 4 ≤ τ⁻¹ := by rw [inv_eq_one_div, le_div_iff τpos]; exact I
  suffices L : τ⁻¹ ≤ ‖a.c i - a.c j‖; · linarith only [J, K, L]
  

Proof state:
case L
E : Type u_1
inst✝ : NormedAddCommGroup E
N : ℕ
τ : ℝ
a : SatelliteConfig E N τ
lastr : r a (last N) = 1
hτ : 1 ≤ τ
δ : ℝ
hδ1 : τ ≤ 1 + δ / 4
hδ2 : δ ≤ 1
i j : Fin (Nat.succ N)
inej : i ≠ j
ah :
  ∀ (i j : Fin (Nat.succ N)),
    i ≠ j → r a i ≤ ‖c a i - c a j‖ ∧ r a j ≤ τ * r a i ∨ r a j ≤ ‖c a j - c a i‖ ∧ r a i ≤ τ * r a j
δnonneg : 0 ≤ δ
D : 0 ≤ 1 - δ / 4
τpos : 0 < τ
I : (1 - δ / 4) * τ ≤ 1
J : 1 - δ ≤ 1 - δ / 4
K : 1 - δ / 4 ≤ τ⁻¹
⊢ τ⁻¹ ≤ ‖c a i - c a j‖

Next tactic:
have hτ' : ∀ k, τ⁻¹ ≤ a.r k := by
    intro k
    rw [inv_eq_one_div, div_le_iff τpos, ← lastr, mul_comm]
    exact a.hlast' k hτ
theorem exists_normalized_aux1 {N : ℕ} {τ : ℝ} (a : SatelliteConfig E N τ)
    (lastr : a.r (last N) = 1) (hτ : 1 ≤ τ) (δ : ℝ) (hδ1 : τ ≤ 1 + δ / 4) (hδ2 : δ ≤ 1)
    (i j : Fin N.succ) (inej : i ≠ j) : 1 - δ ≤ ‖a.c i - a.c j‖ := by
  have ah :
      ∀ i j, i ≠ j → a.r i ≤ ‖a.c i - a.c j‖ ∧ a.r j ≤ τ * a.r i ∨
        a.r j ≤ ‖a.c j - a.c i‖ ∧ a.r i ≤ τ * a.r j := by
    simpa only [dist_eq_norm] using a.h
  have δnonneg : 0 ≤ δ := by linarith only [hτ, hδ1]
  have D : 0 ≤ 1 - δ / 4 := by linarith only [hδ2]
  have τpos : 0 < τ := _root_.zero_lt_one.trans_le hτ
  have I : (1 - δ / 4) * τ ≤ 1 :=
    calc
      (1 - δ / 4) * τ ≤ (1 - δ / 4) * (1 + δ / 4) := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left hδ1 D
      _ = (1 : ℝ) - δ ^ 2 / 16 := by ring
      _ ≤ 1 := by linarith only [sq_nonneg δ]
  have J : 1 - δ ≤ 1 - δ / 4 := by linarith only [δnonneg]
  have K : 1 - δ / 4 ≤ τ⁻¹ := by rw [inv_eq_one_div, le_div_iff τpos]; exact I
  suffices L : τ⁻¹ ≤ ‖a.c i - a.c j‖; · linarith only [J, K, L]
  have hτ' : ∀ k, τ⁻¹ ≤ a.r k := by
    

Proof state:
E : Type u_1
inst✝ : NormedAddCommGroup E
N : ℕ
τ : ℝ
a : SatelliteConfig E N τ
lastr : r a (last N) = 1
hτ : 1 ≤ τ
δ : ℝ
hδ1 : τ ≤ 1 + δ / 4
hδ2 : δ ≤ 1
i j : Fin (Nat.succ N)
inej : i ≠ j
ah :
  ∀ (i j : Fin (Nat.succ N)),
    i ≠ j → r a i ≤ ‖c a i - c a j‖ ∧ r a j ≤ τ * r a i ∨ r a j ≤ ‖c a j - c a i‖ ∧ r a i ≤ τ * r a j
δnonneg : 0 ≤ δ
D : 0 ≤ 1 - δ / 4
τpos : 0 < τ
I : (1 - δ / 4) * τ ≤ 1
J : 1 - δ ≤ 1 - δ / 4
K : 1 - δ / 4 ≤ τ⁻¹
⊢ ∀ (k : Fin (Nat.succ N)), τ⁻¹ ≤ r a k

Next tactic:
intro k
theorem exists_normalized_aux1 {N : ℕ} {τ : ℝ} (a : SatelliteConfig E N τ)
    (lastr : a.r (last N) = 1) (hτ : 1 ≤ τ) (δ : ℝ) (hδ1 : τ ≤ 1 + δ / 4) (hδ2 : δ ≤ 1)
    (i j : Fin N.succ) (inej : i ≠ j) : 1 - δ ≤ ‖a.c i - a.c j‖ := by
  have ah :
      ∀ i j, i ≠ j → a.r i ≤ ‖a.c i - a.c j‖ ∧ a.r j ≤ τ * a.r i ∨
        a.r j ≤ ‖a.c j - a.c i‖ ∧ a.r i ≤ τ * a.r j := by
    simpa only [dist_eq_norm] using a.h
  have δnonneg : 0 ≤ δ := by linarith only [hτ, hδ1]
  have D : 0 ≤ 1 - δ / 4 := by linarith only [hδ2]
  have τpos : 0 < τ := _root_.zero_lt_one.trans_le hτ
  have I : (1 - δ / 4) * τ ≤ 1 :=
    calc
      (1 - δ / 4) * τ ≤ (1 - δ / 4) * (1 + δ / 4) := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left hδ1 D
      _ = (1 : ℝ) - δ ^ 2 / 16 := by ring
      _ ≤ 1 := by linarith only [sq_nonneg δ]
  have J : 1 - δ ≤ 1 - δ / 4 := by linarith only [δnonneg]
  have K : 1 - δ / 4 ≤ τ⁻¹ := by rw [inv_eq_one_div, le_div_iff τpos]; exact I
  suffices L : τ⁻¹ ≤ ‖a.c i - a.c j‖; · linarith only [J, K, L]
  have hτ' : ∀ k, τ⁻¹ ≤ a.r k := by
    intro k
    

Proof state:
E : Type u_1
inst✝ : NormedAddCommGroup E
N : ℕ
τ : ℝ
a : SatelliteConfig E N τ
lastr : r a (last N) = 1
hτ : 1 ≤ τ
δ : ℝ
hδ1 : τ ≤ 1 + δ / 4
hδ2 : δ ≤ 1
i j : Fin (Nat.succ N)
inej : i ≠ j
ah :
  ∀ (i j : Fin (Nat.succ N)),
    i ≠ j → r a i ≤ ‖c a i - c a j‖ ∧ r a j ≤ τ * r a i ∨ r a j ≤ ‖c a j - c a i‖ ∧ r a i ≤ τ * r a j
δnonneg : 0 ≤ δ
D : 0 ≤ 1 - δ / 4
τpos : 0 < τ
I : (1 - δ / 4) * τ ≤ 1
J : 1 - δ ≤ 1 - δ / 4
K : 1 - δ / 4 ≤ τ⁻¹
k : Fin (Nat.succ N)
⊢ τ⁻¹ ≤ r a k

Next tactic:
rw [inv_eq_one_div, div_le_iff τpos, ← lastr, mul_comm]
theorem exists_normalized_aux1 {N : ℕ} {τ : ℝ} (a : SatelliteConfig E N τ)
    (lastr : a.r (last N) = 1) (hτ : 1 ≤ τ) (δ : ℝ) (hδ1 : τ ≤ 1 + δ / 4) (hδ2 : δ ≤ 1)
    (i j : Fin N.succ) (inej : i ≠ j) : 1 - δ ≤ ‖a.c i - a.c j‖ := by
  have ah :
      ∀ i j, i ≠ j → a.r i ≤ ‖a.c i - a.c j‖ ∧ a.r j ≤ τ * a.r i ∨
        a.r j ≤ ‖a.c j - a.c i‖ ∧ a.r i ≤ τ * a.r j := by
    simpa only [dist_eq_norm] using a.h
  have δnonneg : 0 ≤ δ := by linarith only [hτ, hδ1]
  have D : 0 ≤ 1 - δ / 4 := by linarith only [hδ2]
  have τpos : 0 < τ := _root_.zero_lt_one.trans_le hτ
  have I : (1 - δ / 4) * τ ≤ 1 :=
    calc
      (1 - δ / 4) * τ ≤ (1 - δ / 4) * (1 + δ / 4) := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left hδ1 D
      _ = (1 : ℝ) - δ ^ 2 / 16 := by ring
      _ ≤ 1 := by linarith only [sq_nonneg δ]
  have J : 1 - δ ≤ 1 - δ / 4 := by linarith only [δnonneg]
  have K : 1 - δ / 4 ≤ τ⁻¹ := by rw [inv_eq_one_div, le_div_iff τpos]; exact I
  suffices L : τ⁻¹ ≤ ‖a.c i - a.c j‖; · linarith only [J, K, L]
  have hτ' : ∀ k, τ⁻¹ ≤ a.r k := by
    intro k
    rw [inv_eq_one_div, div_le_iff τpos, ← lastr, mul_comm]
    

Proof state:
E : Type u_1
inst✝ : NormedAddCommGroup E
N : ℕ
τ : ℝ
a : SatelliteConfig E N τ
lastr : r a (last N) = 1
hτ : 1 ≤ τ
δ : ℝ
hδ1 : τ ≤ 1 + δ / 4
hδ2 : δ ≤ 1
i j : Fin (Nat.succ N)
inej : i ≠ j
ah :
  ∀ (i j : Fin (Nat.succ N)),
    i ≠ j → r a i ≤ ‖c a i - c a j‖ ∧ r a j ≤ τ * r a i ∨ r a j ≤ ‖c a j - c a i‖ ∧ r a i ≤ τ * r a j
δnonneg : 0 ≤ δ
D : 0 ≤ 1 - δ / 4
τpos : 0 < τ
I : (1 - δ / 4) * τ ≤ 1
J : 1 - δ ≤ 1 - δ / 4
K : 1 - δ / 4 ≤ τ⁻¹
k : Fin (Nat.succ N)
⊢ r a (last N) ≤ τ * r a k

Next tactic:
exact a.hlast' k hτ
theorem exists_normalized_aux1 {N : ℕ} {τ : ℝ} (a : SatelliteConfig E N τ)
    (lastr : a.r (last N) = 1) (hτ : 1 ≤ τ) (δ : ℝ) (hδ1 : τ ≤ 1 + δ / 4) (hδ2 : δ ≤ 1)
    (i j : Fin N.succ) (inej : i ≠ j) : 1 - δ ≤ ‖a.c i - a.c j‖ := by
  have ah :
      ∀ i j, i ≠ j → a.r i ≤ ‖a.c i - a.c j‖ ∧ a.r j ≤ τ * a.r i ∨
        a.r j ≤ ‖a.c j - a.c i‖ ∧ a.r i ≤ τ * a.r j := by
    simpa only [dist_eq_norm] using a.h
  have δnonneg : 0 ≤ δ := by linarith only [hτ, hδ1]
  have D : 0 ≤ 1 - δ / 4 := by linarith only [hδ2]
  have τpos : 0 < τ := _root_.zero_lt_one.trans_le hτ
  have I : (1 - δ / 4) * τ ≤ 1 :=
    calc
      (1 - δ / 4) * τ ≤ (1 - δ / 4) * (1 + δ / 4) := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left hδ1 D
      _ = (1 : ℝ) - δ ^ 2 / 16 := by ring
      _ ≤ 1 := by linarith only [sq_nonneg δ]
  have J : 1 - δ ≤ 1 - δ / 4 := by linarith only [δnonneg]
  have K : 1 - δ / 4 ≤ τ⁻¹ := by rw [inv_eq_one_div, le_div_iff τpos]; exact I
  suffices L : τ⁻¹ ≤ ‖a.c i - a.c j‖; · linarith only [J, K, L]
  have hτ' : ∀ k, τ⁻¹ ≤ a.r k := by
    intro k
    rw [inv_eq_one_div, div_le_iff τpos, ← lastr, mul_comm]
    exact a.hlast' k hτ
  

Proof state:
case L
E : Type u_1
inst✝ : NormedAddCommGroup E
N : ℕ
τ : ℝ
a : SatelliteConfig E N τ
lastr : r a (last N) = 1
hτ : 1 ≤ τ
δ : ℝ
hδ1 : τ ≤ 1 + δ / 4
hδ2 : δ ≤ 1
i j : Fin (Nat.succ N)
inej : i ≠ j
ah :
  ∀ (i j : Fin (Nat.succ N)),
    i ≠ j → r a i ≤ ‖c a i - c a j‖ ∧ r a j ≤ τ * r a i ∨ r a j ≤ ‖c a j - c a i‖ ∧ r a i ≤ τ * r a j
δnonneg : 0 ≤ δ
D : 0 ≤ 1 - δ / 4
τpos : 0 < τ
I : (1 - δ / 4) * τ ≤ 1
J : 1 - δ ≤ 1 - δ / 4
K : 1 - δ / 4 ≤ τ⁻¹
hτ' : ∀ (k : Fin (Nat.succ N)), τ⁻¹ ≤ r a k
⊢ τ⁻¹ ≤ ‖c a i - c a j‖

Next tactic:
rcases ah i j inej with (H | H)
theorem exists_normalized_aux1 {N : ℕ} {τ : ℝ} (a : SatelliteConfig E N τ)
    (lastr : a.r (last N) = 1) (hτ : 1 ≤ τ) (δ : ℝ) (hδ1 : τ ≤ 1 + δ / 4) (hδ2 : δ ≤ 1)
    (i j : Fin N.succ) (inej : i ≠ j) : 1 - δ ≤ ‖a.c i - a.c j‖ := by
  have ah :
      ∀ i j, i ≠ j → a.r i ≤ ‖a.c i - a.c j‖ ∧ a.r j ≤ τ * a.r i ∨
        a.r j ≤ ‖a.c j - a.c i‖ ∧ a.r i ≤ τ * a.r j := by
    simpa only [dist_eq_norm] using a.h
  have δnonneg : 0 ≤ δ := by linarith only [hτ, hδ1]
  have D : 0 ≤ 1 - δ / 4 := by linarith only [hδ2]
  have τpos : 0 < τ := _root_.zero_lt_one.trans_le hτ
  have I : (1 - δ / 4) * τ ≤ 1 :=
    calc
      (1 - δ / 4) * τ ≤ (1 - δ / 4) * (1 + δ / 4) := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left hδ1 D
      _ = (1 : ℝ) - δ ^ 2 / 16 := by ring
      _ ≤ 1 := by linarith only [sq_nonneg δ]
  have J : 1 - δ ≤ 1 - δ / 4 := by linarith only [δnonneg]
  have K : 1 - δ / 4 ≤ τ⁻¹ := by rw [inv_eq_one_div, le_div_iff τpos]; exact I
  suffices L : τ⁻¹ ≤ ‖a.c i - a.c j‖; · linarith only [J, K, L]
  have hτ' : ∀ k, τ⁻¹ ≤ a.r k := by
    intro k
    rw [inv_eq_one_div, div_le_iff τpos, ← lastr, mul_comm]
    exact a.hlast' k hτ
  rcases ah i j inej with (H | H)
  · 

Proof state:
case L.inl
E : Type u_1
inst✝ : NormedAddCommGroup E
N : ℕ
τ : ℝ
a : SatelliteConfig E N τ
lastr : r a (last N) = 1
hτ : 1 ≤ τ
δ : ℝ
hδ1 : τ ≤ 1 + δ / 4
hδ2 : δ ≤ 1
i j : Fin (Nat.succ N)
inej : i ≠ j
ah :
  ∀ (i j : Fin (Nat.succ N)),
    i ≠ j → r a i ≤ ‖c a i - c a j‖ ∧ r a j ≤ τ * r a i ∨ r a j ≤ ‖c a j - c a i‖ ∧ r a i ≤ τ * r a j
δnonneg : 0 ≤ δ
D : 0 ≤ 1 - δ / 4
τpos : 0 < τ
I : (1 - δ / 4) * τ ≤ 1
J : 1 - δ ≤ 1 - δ / 4
K : 1 - δ / 4 ≤ τ⁻¹
hτ' : ∀ (k : Fin (Nat.succ N)), τ⁻¹ ≤ r a k
H : r a i ≤ ‖c a i - c a j‖ ∧ r a j ≤ τ * r a i
⊢ τ⁻¹ ≤ ‖c a i - c a j‖

Next tactic:
apply le_trans _ H.1
theorem exists_normalized_aux1 {N : ℕ} {τ : ℝ} (a : SatelliteConfig E N τ)
    (lastr : a.r (last N) = 1) (hτ : 1 ≤ τ) (δ : ℝ) (hδ1 : τ ≤ 1 + δ / 4) (hδ2 : δ ≤ 1)
    (i j : Fin N.succ) (inej : i ≠ j) : 1 - δ ≤ ‖a.c i - a.c j‖ := by
  have ah :
      ∀ i j, i ≠ j → a.r i ≤ ‖a.c i - a.c j‖ ∧ a.r j ≤ τ * a.r i ∨
        a.r j ≤ ‖a.c j - a.c i‖ ∧ a.r i ≤ τ * a.r j := by
    simpa only [dist_eq_norm] using a.h
  have δnonneg : 0 ≤ δ := by linarith only [hτ, hδ1]
  have D : 0 ≤ 1 - δ / 4 := by linarith only [hδ2]
  have τpos : 0 < τ := _root_.zero_lt_one.trans_le hτ
  have I : (1 - δ / 4) * τ ≤ 1 :=
    calc
      (1 - δ / 4) * τ ≤ (1 - δ / 4) * (1 + δ / 4) := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left hδ1 D
      _ = (1 : ℝ) - δ ^ 2 / 16 := by ring
      _ ≤ 1 := by linarith only [sq_nonneg δ]
  have J : 1 - δ ≤ 1 - δ / 4 := by linarith only [δnonneg]
  have K : 1 - δ / 4 ≤ τ⁻¹ := by rw [inv_eq_one_div, le_div_iff τpos]; exact I
  suffices L : τ⁻¹ ≤ ‖a.c i - a.c j‖; · linarith only [J, K, L]
  have hτ' : ∀ k, τ⁻¹ ≤ a.r k := by
    intro k
    rw [inv_eq_one_div, div_le_iff τpos, ← lastr, mul_comm]
    exact a.hlast' k hτ
  rcases ah i j inej with (H | H)
  · apply le_trans _ H.1
    

Proof state:
E : Type u_1
inst✝ : NormedAddCommGroup E
N : ℕ
τ : ℝ
a : SatelliteConfig E N τ
lastr : r a (last N) = 1
hτ : 1 ≤ τ
δ : ℝ
hδ1 : τ ≤ 1 + δ / 4
hδ2 : δ ≤ 1
i j : Fin (Nat.succ N)
inej : i ≠ j
ah :
  ∀ (i j : Fin (Nat.succ N)),
    i ≠ j → r a i ≤ ‖c a i - c a j‖ ∧ r a j ≤ τ * r a i ∨ r a j ≤ ‖c a j - c a i‖ ∧ r a i ≤ τ * r a j
δnonneg : 0 ≤ δ
D : 0 ≤ 1 - δ / 4
τpos : 0 < τ
I : (1 - δ / 4) * τ ≤ 1
J : 1 - δ ≤ 1 - δ / 4
K : 1 - δ / 4 ≤ τ⁻¹
hτ' : ∀ (k : Fin (Nat.succ N)), τ⁻¹ ≤ r a k
H : r a i ≤ ‖c a i - c a j‖ ∧ r a j ≤ τ * r a i
⊢ τ⁻¹ ≤ r a i

Next tactic:
exact hτ' i
theorem exists_normalized_aux1 {N : ℕ} {τ : ℝ} (a : SatelliteConfig E N τ)
    (lastr : a.r (last N) = 1) (hτ : 1 ≤ τ) (δ : ℝ) (hδ1 : τ ≤ 1 + δ / 4) (hδ2 : δ ≤ 1)
    (i j : Fin N.succ) (inej : i ≠ j) : 1 - δ ≤ ‖a.c i - a.c j‖ := by
  have ah :
      ∀ i j, i ≠ j → a.r i ≤ ‖a.c i - a.c j‖ ∧ a.r j ≤ τ * a.r i ∨
        a.r j ≤ ‖a.c j - a.c i‖ ∧ a.r i ≤ τ * a.r j := by
    simpa only [dist_eq_norm] using a.h
  have δnonneg : 0 ≤ δ := by linarith only [hτ, hδ1]
  have D : 0 ≤ 1 - δ / 4 := by linarith only [hδ2]
  have τpos : 0 < τ := _root_.zero_lt_one.trans_le hτ
  have I : (1 - δ / 4) * τ ≤ 1 :=
    calc
      (1 - δ / 4) * τ ≤ (1 - δ / 4) * (1 + δ / 4) := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left hδ1 D
      _ = (1 : ℝ) - δ ^ 2 / 16 := by ring
      _ ≤ 1 := by linarith only [sq_nonneg δ]
  have J : 1 - δ ≤ 1 - δ / 4 := by linarith only [δnonneg]
  have K : 1 - δ / 4 ≤ τ⁻¹ := by rw [inv_eq_one_div, le_div_iff τpos]; exact I
  suffices L : τ⁻¹ ≤ ‖a.c i - a.c j‖; · linarith only [J, K, L]
  have hτ' : ∀ k, τ⁻¹ ≤ a.r k := by
    intro k
    rw [inv_eq_one_div, div_le_iff τpos, ← lastr, mul_comm]
    exact a.hlast' k hτ
  rcases ah i j inej with (H | H)
  · apply le_trans _ H.1
    exact hτ' i
  · 

Proof state:
case L.inr
E : Type u_1
inst✝ : NormedAddCommGroup E
N : ℕ
τ : ℝ
a : SatelliteConfig E N τ
lastr : r a (last N) = 1
hτ : 1 ≤ τ
δ : ℝ
hδ1 : τ ≤ 1 + δ / 4
hδ2 : δ ≤ 1
i j : Fin (Nat.succ N)
inej : i ≠ j
ah :
  ∀ (i j : Fin (Nat.succ N)),
    i ≠ j → r a i ≤ ‖c a i - c a j‖ ∧ r a j ≤ τ * r a i ∨ r a j ≤ ‖c a j - c a i‖ ∧ r a i ≤ τ * r a j
δnonneg : 0 ≤ δ
D : 0 ≤ 1 - δ / 4
τpos : 0 < τ
I : (1 - δ / 4) * τ ≤ 1
J : 1 - δ ≤ 1 - δ / 4
K : 1 - δ / 4 ≤ τ⁻¹
hτ' : ∀ (k : Fin (Nat.succ N)), τ⁻¹ ≤ r a k
H : r a j ≤ ‖c a j - c a i‖ ∧ r a i ≤ τ * r a j
⊢ τ⁻¹ ≤ ‖c a i - c a j‖

Next tactic:
rw [norm_sub_rev]
theorem exists_normalized_aux1 {N : ℕ} {τ : ℝ} (a : SatelliteConfig E N τ)
    (lastr : a.r (last N) = 1) (hτ : 1 ≤ τ) (δ : ℝ) (hδ1 : τ ≤ 1 + δ / 4) (hδ2 : δ ≤ 1)
    (i j : Fin N.succ) (inej : i ≠ j) : 1 - δ ≤ ‖a.c i - a.c j‖ := by
  have ah :
      ∀ i j, i ≠ j → a.r i ≤ ‖a.c i - a.c j‖ ∧ a.r j ≤ τ * a.r i ∨
        a.r j ≤ ‖a.c j - a.c i‖ ∧ a.r i ≤ τ * a.r j := by
    simpa only [dist_eq_norm] using a.h
  have δnonneg : 0 ≤ δ := by linarith only [hτ, hδ1]
  have D : 0 ≤ 1 - δ / 4 := by linarith only [hδ2]
  have τpos : 0 < τ := _root_.zero_lt_one.trans_le hτ
  have I : (1 - δ / 4) * τ ≤ 1 :=
    calc
      (1 - δ / 4) * τ ≤ (1 - δ / 4) * (1 + δ / 4) := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left hδ1 D
      _ = (1 : ℝ) - δ ^ 2 / 16 := by ring
      _ ≤ 1 := by linarith only [sq_nonneg δ]
  have J : 1 - δ ≤ 1 - δ / 4 := by linarith only [δnonneg]
  have K : 1 - δ / 4 ≤ τ⁻¹ := by rw [inv_eq_one_div, le_div_iff τpos]; exact I
  suffices L : τ⁻¹ ≤ ‖a.c i - a.c j‖; · linarith only [J, K, L]
  have hτ' : ∀ k, τ⁻¹ ≤ a.r k := by
    intro k
    rw [inv_eq_one_div, div_le_iff τpos, ← lastr, mul_comm]
    exact a.hlast' k hτ
  rcases ah i j inej with (H | H)
  · apply le_trans _ H.1
    exact hτ' i
  · rw [norm_sub_rev]
    

Proof state:
case L.inr
E : Type u_1
inst✝ : NormedAddCommGroup E
N : ℕ
τ : ℝ
a : SatelliteConfig E N τ
lastr : r a (last N) = 1
hτ : 1 ≤ τ
δ : ℝ
hδ1 : τ ≤ 1 + δ / 4
hδ2 : δ ≤ 1
i j : Fin (Nat.succ N)
inej : i ≠ j
ah :
  ∀ (i j : Fin (Nat.succ N)),
    i ≠ j → r a i ≤ ‖c a i - c a j‖ ∧ r a j ≤ τ * r a i ∨ r a j ≤ ‖c a j - c a i‖ ∧ r a i ≤ τ * r a j
δnonneg : 0 ≤ δ
D : 0 ≤ 1 - δ / 4
τpos : 0 < τ
I : (1 - δ / 4) * τ ≤ 1
J : 1 - δ ≤ 1 - δ / 4
K : 1 - δ / 4 ≤ τ⁻¹
hτ' : ∀ (k : Fin (Nat.succ N)), τ⁻¹ ≤ r a k
H : r a j ≤ ‖c a j - c a i‖ ∧ r a i ≤ τ * r a j
⊢ τ⁻¹ ≤ ‖c a j - c a i‖

Next tactic:
apply le_trans _ H.1
theorem exists_normalized_aux1 {N : ℕ} {τ : ℝ} (a : SatelliteConfig E N τ)
    (lastr : a.r (last N) = 1) (hτ : 1 ≤ τ) (δ : ℝ) (hδ1 : τ ≤ 1 + δ / 4) (hδ2 : δ ≤ 1)
    (i j : Fin N.succ) (inej : i ≠ j) : 1 - δ ≤ ‖a.c i - a.c j‖ := by
  have ah :
      ∀ i j, i ≠ j → a.r i ≤ ‖a.c i - a.c j‖ ∧ a.r j ≤ τ * a.r i ∨
        a.r j ≤ ‖a.c j - a.c i‖ ∧ a.r i ≤ τ * a.r j := by
    simpa only [dist_eq_norm] using a.h
  have δnonneg : 0 ≤ δ := by linarith only [hτ, hδ1]
  have D : 0 ≤ 1 - δ / 4 := by linarith only [hδ2]
  have τpos : 0 < τ := _root_.zero_lt_one.trans_le hτ
  have I : (1 - δ / 4) * τ ≤ 1 :=
    calc
      (1 - δ / 4) * τ ≤ (1 - δ / 4) * (1 + δ / 4) := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left hδ1 D
      _ = (1 : ℝ) - δ ^ 2 / 16 := by ring
      _ ≤ 1 := by linarith only [sq_nonneg δ]
  have J : 1 - δ ≤ 1 - δ / 4 := by linarith only [δnonneg]
  have K : 1 - δ / 4 ≤ τ⁻¹ := by rw [inv_eq_one_div, le_div_iff τpos]; exact I
  suffices L : τ⁻¹ ≤ ‖a.c i - a.c j‖; · linarith only [J, K, L]
  have hτ' : ∀ k, τ⁻¹ ≤ a.r k := by
    intro k
    rw [inv_eq_one_div, div_le_iff τpos, ← lastr, mul_comm]
    exact a.hlast' k hτ
  rcases ah i j inej with (H | H)
  · apply le_trans _ H.1
    exact hτ' i
  · rw [norm_sub_rev]
    apply le_trans _ H.1
    

Proof state:
E : Type u_1
inst✝ : NormedAddCommGroup E
N : ℕ
τ : ℝ
a : SatelliteConfig E N τ
lastr : r a (last N) = 1
hτ : 1 ≤ τ
δ : ℝ
hδ1 : τ ≤ 1 + δ / 4
hδ2 : δ ≤ 1
i j : Fin (Nat.succ N)
inej : i ≠ j
ah :
  ∀ (i j : Fin (Nat.succ N)),
    i ≠ j → r a i ≤ ‖c a i - c a j‖ ∧ r a j ≤ τ * r a i ∨ r a j ≤ ‖c a j - c a i‖ ∧ r a i ≤ τ * r a j
δnonneg : 0 ≤ δ
D : 0 ≤ 1 - δ / 4
τpos : 0 < τ
I : (1 - δ / 4) * τ ≤ 1
J : 1 - δ ≤ 1 - δ / 4
K : 1 - δ / 4 ≤ τ⁻¹
hτ' : ∀ (k : Fin (Nat.succ N)), τ⁻¹ ≤ r a k
H : r a j ≤ ‖c a j - c a i‖ ∧ r a i ≤ τ * r a j
⊢ τ⁻¹ ≤ r a j

Next tactic:
exact hτ' j