/-- The **measurable Besicovitch covering theorem**. Assume that, for any `x` in a set `s`,
one is given a set of admissible closed balls centered at `x`, with arbitrarily small radii.
Then there exists a disjoint covering of almost all `s` by admissible closed balls centered at some
points of `s`.
This version requires that the underlying measure is finite, and that the space has the Besicovitch
covering property (which is satisfied for instance by normed real vector spaces). It expresses the
conclusion in a slightly awkward form (with a subset of `α × ℝ`) coming from the proof technique.
For a version assuming that the measure is sigma-finite,
see `exists_disjoint_closedBall_covering_ae_aux`.
For a version giving the conclusion in a nicer form, see `exists_disjoint_closedBall_covering_ae`.
-/
theorem exists_disjoint_closedBall_covering_ae_of_finiteMeasure_aux (μ : Measure α)
    [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (f : α → Set ℝ) (s : Set α)
    (hf : ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ δ > 0, (f x ∩ Ioo 0 δ).Nonempty) :
    ∃ t : Set (α × ℝ),
      t.Countable ∧
        (∀ p : α × ℝ, p ∈ t → p.1 ∈ s) ∧
          (∀ p : α × ℝ, p ∈ t → p.2 ∈ f p.1) ∧
            μ (s \ ⋃ (p : α × ℝ) (_ : p ∈ t), closedBall p.1 p.2) = 0 ∧
              t.PairwiseDisjoint fun p => closedBall p.1 p.2 := by
  rcases HasBesicovitchCovering.no_satelliteConfig (α := α) with ⟨N, τ, hτ, hN⟩
  /- Introduce a property `P` on finsets saying that we have a nice disjoint covering of a
      subset of `s` by admissible balls. -/
  let P : Finset (α × ℝ) → Prop := fun t =>
    ((t : Set (α × ℝ)).PairwiseDisjoint fun p => closedBall p.1 p.2) ∧
      (∀ p : α × ℝ, p ∈ t → p.1 ∈ s) ∧ ∀ p : α × ℝ, p ∈ t → p.2 ∈ f p.1
  /- Given a finite good covering of a subset `s`, one can find a larger finite good covering,
    covering additionally a proportion at least `1/(N+1)` of leftover points. This follows from
    `exist_finset_disjoint_balls_large_measure` applied to balls not intersecting the initial
    covering. -/
  have :
      ∀ t : Finset (α × ℝ), P t → ∃ u : Finset (α × ℝ), t ⊆ u ∧ P u ∧
        μ (s \ ⋃ (p : α × ℝ) (_ : p ∈ u), closedBall p.1 p.2) ≤
          N / (N + 1) * μ (s \ ⋃ (p : α × ℝ) (_ : p ∈ t), closedBall p.1 p.2) := by
    intro t ht
    set B := ⋃ (p : α × ℝ) (_ : p ∈ t), closedBall p.1 p.2 with hB
    have B_closed : IsClosed B := isClosed_biUnion_finset fun i _ => isClosed_ball
    set s' := s \ B
    

Proof state:
α : Type u_1
inst✝⁵ : MetricSpace α
β : Type u
inst✝⁴ : SecondCountableTopology α
inst✝³ : MeasurableSpace α
inst✝² : OpensMeasurableSpace α
inst✝¹ : HasBesicovitchCovering α
μ : Measure α
inst✝ : IsFiniteMeasure μ
f : α → Set ℝ
s : Set α
hf : ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ δ > 0, Set.Nonempty (f x ∩ Ioo 0 δ)
N : ℕ
τ : ℝ
hτ : 1 < τ
hN : IsEmpty (SatelliteConfig α N τ)
P : Finset (α × ℝ) → Prop :=
  fun t => (PairwiseDisjoint ↑t fun p => closedBall p.1 p.2) ∧ (∀ p ∈ t, p.1 ∈ s) ∧ ∀ p ∈ t, p.2 ∈ f p.1
t : Finset (α × ℝ)
ht : P t
B : Set α := ⋃ p ∈ t, closedBall p.1 p.2
hB : B = ⋃ p ∈ t, closedBall p.1 p.2
B_closed : IsClosed B
s' : Set α := s \ B
⊢ ∃ u, t ⊆ u ∧ P u ∧ ↑↑μ (s \ ⋃ p ∈ u, closedBall p.1 p.2) ≤ ↑N / (↑N + 1) * ↑↑μ s'

Next tactic:
have : ∀ x ∈ s', ∃ r ∈ f x ∩ Ioo 0 1, Disjoint B (closedBall x r) := by
      intro x hx
      have xs : x ∈ s := ((mem_diff x).1 hx).1
      rcases eq_empty_or_nonempty B with (hB | hB)
      · rcases hf x xs 1 zero_lt_one with ⟨r, hr, h'r⟩
        exact ⟨r, ⟨hr, h'r⟩, by simp only [hB, empty_disjoint]⟩
      · let r := infDist x B
        have : 0 < min r 1 :=
          lt_min ((B_closed.not_mem_iff_infDist_pos hB).1 ((mem_diff x).1 hx).2) zero_lt_one
        rcases hf x xs _ this with ⟨r, hr, h'r⟩
        refine' ⟨r, ⟨hr, ⟨h'r.1, h'r.2.trans_le (min_le_right _ _)⟩⟩, _⟩
        rw [disjoint_comm]
        exact disjoint_closedBall_of_lt_infDist (h'r.2.trans_le (min_le_left _ _))