l3lab/ntp-mathlib huggingface dataset:
theorem fg_iff_addSubmonoid_fg (P : Submodule ℕ M) : P.FG ↔ P.toAddSubmonoid.FG :=
  ⟨fun ⟨S, hS⟩ => ⟨S, by simpa [← span_nat_eq_addSubmonoid_closure] using hS⟩, fun ⟨S, hS⟩ =>
    ⟨S, by 

Proof state:
R : Type u_1
M : Type u_2
inst✝² : Semiring R
inst✝¹ : AddCommMonoid M
inst✝ : Module R M
P : Submodule ℕ M
x✝ : AddSubmonoid.FG P.toAddSubmonoid
S : Finset M
hS : AddSubmonoid.closure ↑S = P.toAddSubmonoid
⊢ span ℕ ↑S = P

Next tactic:
simpa [← span_nat_eq_addSubmonoid_closure] using hS
theorem fg_iff_add_subgroup_fg {G : Type*} [AddCommGroup G] (P : Submodule ℤ G) :
    P.FG ↔ P.toAddSubgroup.FG :=
  ⟨fun ⟨S, hS⟩ => ⟨S, by 

Proof state:
R : Type u_1
M : Type u_2
inst✝³ : Semiring R
inst✝² : AddCommMonoid M
inst✝¹ : Module R M
G : Type u_3
inst✝ : AddCommGroup G
P : Submodule ℤ G
x✝ : FG P
S : Finset G
hS : span ℤ ↑S = P
⊢ AddSubgroup.closure ↑S = toAddSubgroup P

Next tactic:
simpa [← span_int_eq_addSubgroup_closure] using hS
theorem fg_iff_add_subgroup_fg {G : Type*} [AddCommGroup G] (P : Submodule ℤ G) :
    P.FG ↔ P.toAddSubgroup.FG :=
  ⟨fun ⟨S, hS⟩ => ⟨S, by simpa [← span_int_eq_addSubgroup_closure] using hS⟩, fun ⟨S, hS⟩ =>
    ⟨S, by 

Proof state:
R : Type u_1
M : Type u_2
inst✝³ : Semiring R
inst✝² : AddCommMonoid M
inst✝¹ : Module R M
G : Type u_3
inst✝ : AddCommGroup G
P : Submodule ℤ G
x✝ : AddSubgroup.FG (toAddSubgroup P)
S : Finset G
hS : AddSubgroup.closure ↑S = toAddSubgroup P
⊢ span ℤ ↑S = P

Next tactic:
simpa [← span_int_eq_addSubgroup_closure] using hS
theorem fg_iff_exists_fin_generating_family {N : Submodule R M} :
    N.FG ↔ ∃ (n : ℕ) (s : Fin n → M), span R (range s) = N := by
  

Proof state:
R : Type u_1
M : Type u_2
inst✝² : Semiring R
inst✝¹ : AddCommMonoid M
inst✝ : Module R M
N : Submodule R M
⊢ FG N ↔ ∃ n s, span R (range s) = N

Next tactic:
rw [fg_def]
theorem fg_iff_exists_fin_generating_family {N : Submodule R M} :
    N.FG ↔ ∃ (n : ℕ) (s : Fin n → M), span R (range s) = N := by
  rw [fg_def]
  

Proof state:
R : Type u_1
M : Type u_2
inst✝² : Semiring R
inst✝¹ : AddCommMonoid M
inst✝ : Module R M
N : Submodule R M
⊢ (∃ S, Set.Finite S ∧ span R S = N) ↔ ∃ n s, span R (range s) = N

Next tactic:
constructor
theorem fg_iff_exists_fin_generating_family {N : Submodule R M} :
    N.FG ↔ ∃ (n : ℕ) (s : Fin n → M), span R (range s) = N := by
  rw [fg_def]
  constructor
  · 

Proof state:
case mp
R : Type u_1
M : Type u_2
inst✝² : Semiring R
inst✝¹ : AddCommMonoid M
inst✝ : Module R M
N : Submodule R M
⊢ (∃ S, Set.Finite S ∧ span R S = N) → ∃ n s, span R (range s) = N

Next tactic:
rintro ⟨S, Sfin, hS⟩
theorem fg_iff_exists_fin_generating_family {N : Submodule R M} :
    N.FG ↔ ∃ (n : ℕ) (s : Fin n → M), span R (range s) = N := by
  rw [fg_def]
  constructor
  · rintro ⟨S, Sfin, hS⟩
    

Proof state:
case mp.intro.intro
R : Type u_1
M : Type u_2
inst✝² : Semiring R
inst✝¹ : AddCommMonoid M
inst✝ : Module R M
N : Submodule R M
S : Set M
Sfin : Set.Finite S
hS : span R S = N
⊢ ∃ n s, span R (range s) = N

Next tactic:
obtain ⟨n, f, rfl⟩ := Sfin.fin_embedding
theorem fg_iff_exists_fin_generating_family {N : Submodule R M} :
    N.FG ↔ ∃ (n : ℕ) (s : Fin n → M), span R (range s) = N := by
  rw [fg_def]
  constructor
  · rintro ⟨S, Sfin, hS⟩
    obtain ⟨n, f, rfl⟩ := Sfin.fin_embedding
    

Proof state:
case mp.intro.intro.intro.intro
R : Type u_1
M : Type u_2
inst✝² : Semiring R
inst✝¹ : AddCommMonoid M
inst✝ : Module R M
N : Submodule R M
n : ℕ
f : Fin n ↪ M
Sfin : Set.Finite (range ⇑f)
hS : span R (range ⇑f) = N
⊢ ∃ n s, span R (range s) = N

Next tactic:
exact ⟨n, f, hS⟩
theorem fg_iff_exists_fin_generating_family {N : Submodule R M} :
    N.FG ↔ ∃ (n : ℕ) (s : Fin n → M), span R (range s) = N := by
  rw [fg_def]
  constructor
  · rintro ⟨S, Sfin, hS⟩
    obtain ⟨n, f, rfl⟩ := Sfin.fin_embedding
    exact ⟨n, f, hS⟩
  · 

Proof state:
case mpr
R : Type u_1
M : Type u_2
inst✝² : Semiring R
inst✝¹ : AddCommMonoid M
inst✝ : Module R M
N : Submodule R M
⊢ (∃ n s, span R (range s) = N) → ∃ S, Set.Finite S ∧ span R S = N

Next tactic:
rintro ⟨n, s, hs⟩
theorem fg_iff_exists_fin_generating_family {N : Submodule R M} :
    N.FG ↔ ∃ (n : ℕ) (s : Fin n → M), span R (range s) = N := by
  rw [fg_def]
  constructor
  · rintro ⟨S, Sfin, hS⟩
    obtain ⟨n, f, rfl⟩ := Sfin.fin_embedding
    exact ⟨n, f, hS⟩
  · rintro ⟨n, s, hs⟩
    

Proof state:
case mpr.intro.intro
R : Type u_1
M : Type u_2
inst✝² : Semiring R
inst✝¹ : AddCommMonoid M
inst✝ : Module R M
N : Submodule R M
n : ℕ
s : Fin n → M
hs : span R (range s) = N
⊢ ∃ S, Set.Finite S ∧ span R S = N

Next tactic:
refine' ⟨range s, finite_range s, hs⟩
/-- **Nakayama's Lemma**. Atiyah-Macdonald 2.5, Eisenbud 4.7, Matsumura 2.2,
[Stacks 00DV](https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/00DV) -/
theorem exists_sub_one_mem_and_smul_eq_zero_of_fg_of_le_smul {R : Type*} [CommRing R] {M : Type*}
    [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] (I : Ideal R) (N : Submodule R M) (hn : N.FG) (hin : N ≤ I • N) :
    ∃ r : R, r - 1 ∈ I ∧ ∀ n ∈ N, r • n = (0 : M) := by
  

Proof state:
R✝ : Type u_1
M✝ : Type u_2
inst✝⁵ : Semiring R✝
inst✝⁴ : AddCommMonoid M✝
inst✝³ : Module R✝ M✝
R : Type u_3
inst✝² : CommRing R
M : Type u_4
inst✝¹ : AddCommGroup M
inst✝ : Module R M
I : Ideal R
N : Submodule R M
hn : FG N
hin : N ≤ I • N
⊢ ∃ r, r - 1 ∈ I ∧ ∀ n ∈ N, r • n = 0

Next tactic:
rw [fg_def] at hn
/-- **Nakayama's Lemma**. Atiyah-Macdonald 2.5, Eisenbud 4.7, Matsumura 2.2,
[Stacks 00DV](https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/00DV) -/
theorem exists_sub_one_mem_and_smul_eq_zero_of_fg_of_le_smul {R : Type*} [CommRing R] {M : Type*}
    [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] (I : Ideal R) (N : Submodule R M) (hn : N.FG) (hin : N ≤ I • N) :
    ∃ r : R, r - 1 ∈ I ∧ ∀ n ∈ N, r • n = (0 : M) := by
  rw [fg_def] at hn
  

Proof state:
R✝ : Type u_1
M✝ : Type u_2
inst✝⁵ : Semiring R✝
inst✝⁴ : AddCommMonoid M✝
inst✝³ : Module R✝ M✝
R : Type u_3
inst✝² : CommRing R
M : Type u_4
inst✝¹ : AddCommGroup M
inst✝ : Module R M
I : Ideal R
N : Submodule R M
hn : ∃ S, Set.Finite S ∧ span R S = N
hin : N ≤ I • N
⊢ ∃ r, r - 1 ∈ I ∧ ∀ n ∈ N, r • n = 0

Next tactic:
rcases hn with ⟨s, hfs, hs⟩
/-- **Nakayama's Lemma**. Atiyah-Macdonald 2.5, Eisenbud 4.7, Matsumura 2.2,
[Stacks 00DV](https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/00DV) -/
theorem exists_sub_one_mem_and_smul_eq_zero_of_fg_of_le_smul {R : Type*} [CommRing R] {M : Type*}
    [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] (I : Ideal R) (N : Submodule R M) (hn : N.FG) (hin : N ≤ I • N) :
    ∃ r : R, r - 1 ∈ I ∧ ∀ n ∈ N, r • n = (0 : M) := by
  rw [fg_def] at hn
  rcases hn with ⟨s, hfs, hs⟩
  

Proof state:
case intro.intro
R✝ : Type u_1
M✝ : Type u_2
inst✝⁵ : Semiring R✝
inst✝⁴ : AddCommMonoid M✝
inst✝³ : Module R✝ M✝
R : Type u_3
inst✝² : CommRing R
M : Type u_4
inst✝¹ : AddCommGroup M
inst✝ : Module R M
I : Ideal R
N : Submodule R M
hin : N ≤ I • N
s : Set M
hfs : Set.Finite s
hs : span R s = N
⊢ ∃ r, r - 1 ∈ I ∧ ∀ n ∈ N, r • n = 0

Next tactic:
have : ∃ r : R, r - 1 ∈ I ∧ N ≤ (I • span R s).comap (LinearMap.lsmul R M r) ∧ s ⊆ N := by
    refine' ⟨1, _, _, _⟩
    · rw [sub_self]
      exact I.zero_mem
    · rw [hs]
      intro n hn
      rw [mem_comap]
      change (1 : R) • n ∈ I • N
      rw [one_smul]
      exact hin hn
    · rw [← span_le, hs]
/-- **Nakayama's Lemma**. Atiyah-Macdonald 2.5, Eisenbud 4.7, Matsumura 2.2,
[Stacks 00DV](https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/00DV) -/
theorem exists_sub_one_mem_and_smul_eq_zero_of_fg_of_le_smul {R : Type*} [CommRing R] {M : Type*}
    [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] (I : Ideal R) (N : Submodule R M) (hn : N.FG) (hin : N ≤ I • N) :
    ∃ r : R, r - 1 ∈ I ∧ ∀ n ∈ N, r • n = (0 : M) := by
  rw [fg_def] at hn
  rcases hn with ⟨s, hfs, hs⟩
  have : ∃ r : R, r - 1 ∈ I ∧ N ≤ (I • span R s).comap (LinearMap.lsmul R M r) ∧ s ⊆ N := by
    

Proof state:
R✝ : Type u_1
M✝ : Type u_2
inst✝⁵ : Semiring R✝
inst✝⁴ : AddCommMonoid M✝
inst✝³ : Module R✝ M✝
R : Type u_3
inst✝² : CommRing R
M : Type u_4
inst✝¹ : AddCommGroup M
inst✝ : Module R M
I : Ideal R
N : Submodule R M
hin : N ≤ I • N
s : Set M
hfs : Set.Finite s
hs : span R s = N
⊢ ∃ r, r - 1 ∈ I ∧ N ≤ comap ((LinearMap.lsmul R M) r) (I • span R s) ∧ s ⊆ ↑N

Next tactic:
refine' ⟨1, _, _, _⟩
/-- **Nakayama's Lemma**. Atiyah-Macdonald 2.5, Eisenbud 4.7, Matsumura 2.2,
[Stacks 00DV](https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/00DV) -/
theorem exists_sub_one_mem_and_smul_eq_zero_of_fg_of_le_smul {R : Type*} [CommRing R] {M : Type*}
    [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] (I : Ideal R) (N : Submodule R M) (hn : N.FG) (hin : N ≤ I • N) :
    ∃ r : R, r - 1 ∈ I ∧ ∀ n ∈ N, r • n = (0 : M) := by
  rw [fg_def] at hn
  rcases hn with ⟨s, hfs, hs⟩
  have : ∃ r : R, r - 1 ∈ I ∧ N ≤ (I • span R s).comap (LinearMap.lsmul R M r) ∧ s ⊆ N := by
    refine' ⟨1, _, _, _⟩
    · 

Proof state:
case refine'_1
R✝ : Type u_1
M✝ : Type u_2
inst✝⁵ : Semiring R✝
inst✝⁴ : AddCommMonoid M✝
inst✝³ : Module R✝ M✝
R : Type u_3
inst✝² : CommRing R
M : Type u_4
inst✝¹ : AddCommGroup M
inst✝ : Module R M
I : Ideal R
N : Submodule R M
hin : N ≤ I • N
s : Set M
hfs : Set.Finite s
hs : span R s = N
⊢ 1 - 1 ∈ I

Next tactic:
rw [sub_self]
/-- **Nakayama's Lemma**. Atiyah-Macdonald 2.5, Eisenbud 4.7, Matsumura 2.2,
[Stacks 00DV](https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/00DV) -/
theorem exists_sub_one_mem_and_smul_eq_zero_of_fg_of_le_smul {R : Type*} [CommRing R] {M : Type*}
    [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] (I : Ideal R) (N : Submodule R M) (hn : N.FG) (hin : N ≤ I • N) :
    ∃ r : R, r - 1 ∈ I ∧ ∀ n ∈ N, r • n = (0 : M) := by
  rw [fg_def] at hn
  rcases hn with ⟨s, hfs, hs⟩
  have : ∃ r : R, r - 1 ∈ I ∧ N ≤ (I • span R s).comap (LinearMap.lsmul R M r) ∧ s ⊆ N := by
    refine' ⟨1, _, _, _⟩
    · rw [sub_self]
      

Proof state:
case refine'_1
R✝ : Type u_1
M✝ : Type u_2
inst✝⁵ : Semiring R✝
inst✝⁴ : AddCommMonoid M✝
inst✝³ : Module R✝ M✝
R : Type u_3
inst✝² : CommRing R
M : Type u_4
inst✝¹ : AddCommGroup M
inst✝ : Module R M
I : Ideal R
N : Submodule R M
hin : N ≤ I • N
s : Set M
hfs : Set.Finite s
hs : span R s = N
⊢ 0 ∈ I

Next tactic:
exact I.zero_mem
/-- **Nakayama's Lemma**. Atiyah-Macdonald 2.5, Eisenbud 4.7, Matsumura 2.2,
[Stacks 00DV](https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/00DV) -/
theorem exists_sub_one_mem_and_smul_eq_zero_of_fg_of_le_smul {R : Type*} [CommRing R] {M : Type*}
    [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] (I : Ideal R) (N : Submodule R M) (hn : N.FG) (hin : N ≤ I • N) :
    ∃ r : R, r - 1 ∈ I ∧ ∀ n ∈ N, r • n = (0 : M) := by
  rw [fg_def] at hn
  rcases hn with ⟨s, hfs, hs⟩
  have : ∃ r : R, r - 1 ∈ I ∧ N ≤ (I • span R s).comap (LinearMap.lsmul R M r) ∧ s ⊆ N := by
    refine' ⟨1, _, _, _⟩
    · rw [sub_self]
      exact I.zero_mem
    · 

Proof state:
case refine'_2
R✝ : Type u_1
M✝ : Type u_2
inst✝⁵ : Semiring R✝
inst✝⁴ : AddCommMonoid M✝
inst✝³ : Module R✝ M✝
R : Type u_3
inst✝² : CommRing R
M : Type u_4
inst✝¹ : AddCommGroup M
inst✝ : Module R M
I : Ideal R
N : Submodule R M
hin : N ≤ I • N
s : Set M
hfs : Set.Finite s
hs : span R s = N
⊢ N ≤ comap ((LinearMap.lsmul R M) 1) (I • span R s)

Next tactic:
rw [hs]
/-- **Nakayama's Lemma**. Atiyah-Macdonald 2.5, Eisenbud 4.7, Matsumura 2.2,
[Stacks 00DV](https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/00DV) -/
theorem exists_sub_one_mem_and_smul_eq_zero_of_fg_of_le_smul {R : Type*} [CommRing R] {M : Type*}
    [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] (I : Ideal R) (N : Submodule R M) (hn : N.FG) (hin : N ≤ I • N) :
    ∃ r : R, r - 1 ∈ I ∧ ∀ n ∈ N, r • n = (0 : M) := by
  rw [fg_def] at hn
  rcases hn with ⟨s, hfs, hs⟩
  have : ∃ r : R, r - 1 ∈ I ∧ N ≤ (I • span R s).comap (LinearMap.lsmul R M r) ∧ s ⊆ N := by
    refine' ⟨1, _, _, _⟩
    · rw [sub_self]
      exact I.zero_mem
    · rw [hs]
      

Proof state:
case refine'_2
R✝ : Type u_1
M✝ : Type u_2
inst✝⁵ : Semiring R✝
inst✝⁴ : AddCommMonoid M✝
inst✝³ : Module R✝ M✝
R : Type u_3
inst✝² : CommRing R
M : Type u_4
inst✝¹ : AddCommGroup M
inst✝ : Module R M
I : Ideal R
N : Submodule R M
hin : N ≤ I • N
s : Set M
hfs : Set.Finite s
hs : span R s = N
⊢ N ≤ comap ((LinearMap.lsmul R M) 1) (I • N)

Next tactic:
intro n hn
/-- **Nakayama's Lemma**. Atiyah-Macdonald 2.5, Eisenbud 4.7, Matsumura 2.2,
[Stacks 00DV](https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/00DV) -/
theorem exists_sub_one_mem_and_smul_eq_zero_of_fg_of_le_smul {R : Type*} [CommRing R] {M : Type*}
    [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] (I : Ideal R) (N : Submodule R M) (hn : N.FG) (hin : N ≤ I • N) :
    ∃ r : R, r - 1 ∈ I ∧ ∀ n ∈ N, r • n = (0 : M) := by
  rw [fg_def] at hn
  rcases hn with ⟨s, hfs, hs⟩
  have : ∃ r : R, r - 1 ∈ I ∧ N ≤ (I • span R s).comap (LinearMap.lsmul R M r) ∧ s ⊆ N := by
    refine' ⟨1, _, _, _⟩
    · rw [sub_self]
      exact I.zero_mem
    · rw [hs]
      intro n hn
      

Proof state:
case refine'_2
R✝ : Type u_1
M✝ : Type u_2
inst✝⁵ : Semiring R✝
inst✝⁴ : AddCommMonoid M✝
inst✝³ : Module R✝ M✝
R : Type u_3
inst✝² : CommRing R
M : Type u_4
inst✝¹ : AddCommGroup M
inst✝ : Module R M
I : Ideal R
N : Submodule R M
hin : N ≤ I • N
s : Set M
hfs : Set.Finite s
hs : span R s = N
n : M
hn : n ∈ N
⊢ n ∈ comap ((LinearMap.lsmul R M) 1) (I • N)

Next tactic:
rw [mem_comap]
/-- **Nakayama's Lemma**. Atiyah-Macdonald 2.5, Eisenbud 4.7, Matsumura 2.2,
[Stacks 00DV](https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/00DV) -/
theorem exists_sub_one_mem_and_smul_eq_zero_of_fg_of_le_smul {R : Type*} [CommRing R] {M : Type*}
    [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] (I : Ideal R) (N : Submodule R M) (hn : N.FG) (hin : N ≤ I • N) :
    ∃ r : R, r - 1 ∈ I ∧ ∀ n ∈ N, r • n = (0 : M) := by
  rw [fg_def] at hn
  rcases hn with ⟨s, hfs, hs⟩
  have : ∃ r : R, r - 1 ∈ I ∧ N ≤ (I • span R s).comap (LinearMap.lsmul R M r) ∧ s ⊆ N := by
    refine' ⟨1, _, _, _⟩
    · rw [sub_self]
      exact I.zero_mem
    · rw [hs]
      intro n hn
      rw [mem_comap]
      

Proof state:
case refine'_2
R✝ : Type u_1
M✝ : Type u_2
inst✝⁵ : Semiring R✝
inst✝⁴ : AddCommMonoid M✝
inst✝³ : Module R✝ M✝
R : Type u_3
inst✝² : CommRing R
M : Type u_4
inst✝¹ : AddCommGroup M
inst✝ : Module R M
I : Ideal R
N : Submodule R M
hin : N ≤ I • N
s : Set M
hfs : Set.Finite s
hs : span R s = N
n : M
hn : n ∈ N
⊢ ((LinearMap.lsmul R M) 1) n ∈ I • N

Next tactic:
change (1 : R) • n ∈ I • N
/-- **Nakayama's Lemma**. Atiyah-Macdonald 2.5, Eisenbud 4.7, Matsumura 2.2,
[Stacks 00DV](https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/00DV) -/
theorem exists_sub_one_mem_and_smul_eq_zero_of_fg_of_le_smul {R : Type*} [CommRing R] {M : Type*}
    [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] (I : Ideal R) (N : Submodule R M) (hn : N.FG) (hin : N ≤ I • N) :
    ∃ r : R, r - 1 ∈ I ∧ ∀ n ∈ N, r • n = (0 : M) := by
  rw [fg_def] at hn
  rcases hn with ⟨s, hfs, hs⟩
  have : ∃ r : R, r - 1 ∈ I ∧ N ≤ (I • span R s).comap (LinearMap.lsmul R M r) ∧ s ⊆ N := by
    refine' ⟨1, _, _, _⟩
    · rw [sub_self]
      exact I.zero_mem
    · rw [hs]
      intro n hn
      rw [mem_comap]
      change (1 : R) • n ∈ I • N
      

Proof state:
case refine'_2
R✝ : Type u_1
M✝ : Type u_2
inst✝⁵ : Semiring R✝
inst✝⁴ : AddCommMonoid M✝
inst✝³ : Module R✝ M✝
R : Type u_3
inst✝² : CommRing R
M : Type u_4
inst✝¹ : AddCommGroup M
inst✝ : Module R M
I : Ideal R
N : Submodule R M
hin : N ≤ I • N
s : Set M
hfs : Set.Finite s
hs : span R s = N
n : M
hn : n ∈ N
⊢ 1 • n ∈ I • N

Next tactic:
rw [one_smul]
/-- **Nakayama's Lemma**. Atiyah-Macdonald 2.5, Eisenbud 4.7, Matsumura 2.2,
[Stacks 00DV](https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/00DV) -/
theorem exists_sub_one_mem_and_smul_eq_zero_of_fg_of_le_smul {R : Type*} [CommRing R] {M : Type*}
    [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] (I : Ideal R) (N : Submodule R M) (hn : N.FG) (hin : N ≤ I • N) :
    ∃ r : R, r - 1 ∈ I ∧ ∀ n ∈ N, r • n = (0 : M) := by
  rw [fg_def] at hn
  rcases hn with ⟨s, hfs, hs⟩
  have : ∃ r : R, r - 1 ∈ I ∧ N ≤ (I • span R s).comap (LinearMap.lsmul R M r) ∧ s ⊆ N := by
    refine' ⟨1, _, _, _⟩
    · rw [sub_self]
      exact I.zero_mem
    · rw [hs]
      intro n hn
      rw [mem_comap]
      change (1 : R) • n ∈ I • N
      rw [one_smul]
      

Proof state:
case refine'_2
R✝ : Type u_1
M✝ : Type u_2
inst✝⁵ : Semiring R✝
inst✝⁴ : AddCommMonoid M✝
inst✝³ : Module R✝ M✝
R : Type u_3
inst✝² : CommRing R
M : Type u_4
inst✝¹ : AddCommGroup M
inst✝ : Module R M
I : Ideal R
N : Submodule R M
hin : N ≤ I • N
s : Set M
hfs : Set.Finite s
hs : span R s = N
n : M
hn : n ∈ N
⊢ n ∈ I • N

Next tactic:
exact hin hn
/-- **Nakayama's Lemma**. Atiyah-Macdonald 2.5, Eisenbud 4.7, Matsumura 2.2,
[Stacks 00DV](https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/00DV) -/
theorem exists_sub_one_mem_and_smul_eq_zero_of_fg_of_le_smul {R : Type*} [CommRing R] {M : Type*}
    [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] (I : Ideal R) (N : Submodule R M) (hn : N.FG) (hin : N ≤ I • N) :
    ∃ r : R, r - 1 ∈ I ∧ ∀ n ∈ N, r • n = (0 : M) := by
  rw [fg_def] at hn
  rcases hn with ⟨s, hfs, hs⟩
  have : ∃ r : R, r - 1 ∈ I ∧ N ≤ (I • span R s).comap (LinearMap.lsmul R M r) ∧ s ⊆ N := by
    refine' ⟨1, _, _, _⟩
    · rw [sub_self]
      exact I.zero_mem
    · rw [hs]
      intro n hn
      rw [mem_comap]
      change (1 : R) • n ∈ I • N
      rw [one_smul]
      exact hin hn
    · 

Proof state:
case refine'_3
R✝ : Type u_1
M✝ : Type u_2
inst✝⁵ : Semiring R✝
inst✝⁴ : AddCommMonoid M✝
inst✝³ : Module R✝ M✝
R : Type u_3
inst✝² : CommRing R
M : Type u_4
inst✝¹ : AddCommGroup M
inst✝ : Module R M
I : Ideal R
N : Submodule R M
hin : N ≤ I • N
s : Set M
hfs : Set.Finite s
hs : span R s = N
⊢ s ⊆ ↑N

Next tactic:
rw [← span_le, hs]
/-- **Nakayama's Lemma**. Atiyah-Macdonald 2.5, Eisenbud 4.7, Matsumura 2.2,
[Stacks 00DV](https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/00DV) -/
theorem exists_sub_one_mem_and_smul_eq_zero_of_fg_of_le_smul {R : Type*} [CommRing R] {M : Type*}
    [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] (I : Ideal R) (N : Submodule R M) (hn : N.FG) (hin : N ≤ I • N) :
    ∃ r : R, r - 1 ∈ I ∧ ∀ n ∈ N, r • n = (0 : M) := by
  rw [fg_def] at hn
  rcases hn with ⟨s, hfs, hs⟩
  have : ∃ r : R, r - 1 ∈ I ∧ N ≤ (I • span R s).comap (LinearMap.lsmul R M r) ∧ s ⊆ N := by
    refine' ⟨1, _, _, _⟩
    · rw [sub_self]
      exact I.zero_mem
    · rw [hs]
      intro n hn
      rw [mem_comap]
      change (1 : R) • n ∈ I • N
      rw [one_smul]
      exact hin hn
    · rw [← span_le, hs]
  

Proof state:
case intro.intro
R✝ : Type u_1
M✝ : Type u_2
inst✝⁵ : Semiring R✝
inst✝⁴ : AddCommMonoid M✝
inst✝³ : Module R✝ M✝
R : Type u_3
inst✝² : CommRing R
M : Type u_4
inst✝¹ : AddCommGroup M
inst✝ : Module R M
I : Ideal R
N : Submodule R M
hin : N ≤ I • N
s : Set M
hfs : Set.Finite s
hs : span R s = N
this : ∃ r, r - 1 ∈ I ∧ N ≤ comap ((LinearMap.lsmul R M) r) (I • span R s) ∧ s ⊆ ↑N
⊢ ∃ r, r - 1 ∈ I ∧ ∀ n ∈ N, r • n = 0

Next tactic:
clear hin hs
/-- **Nakayama's Lemma**. Atiyah-Macdonald 2.5, Eisenbud 4.7, Matsumura 2.2,
[Stacks 00DV](https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/00DV) -/
theorem exists_sub_one_mem_and_smul_eq_zero_of_fg_of_le_smul {R : Type*} [CommRing R] {M : Type*}
    [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] (I : Ideal R) (N : Submodule R M) (hn : N.FG) (hin : N ≤ I • N) :
    ∃ r : R, r - 1 ∈ I ∧ ∀ n ∈ N, r • n = (0 : M) := by
  rw [fg_def] at hn
  rcases hn with ⟨s, hfs, hs⟩
  have : ∃ r : R, r - 1 ∈ I ∧ N ≤ (I • span R s).comap (LinearMap.lsmul R M r) ∧ s ⊆ N := by
    refine' ⟨1, _, _, _⟩
    · rw [sub_self]
      exact I.zero_mem
    · rw [hs]
      intro n hn
      rw [mem_comap]
      change (1 : R) • n ∈ I • N
      rw [one_smul]
      exact hin hn
    · rw [← span_le, hs]
  clear hin hs
  

Proof state:
case intro.intro
R✝ : Type u_1
M✝ : Type u_2
inst✝⁵ : Semiring R✝
inst✝⁴ : AddCommMonoid M✝
inst✝³ : Module R✝ M✝
R : Type u_3
inst✝² : CommRing R
M : Type u_4
inst✝¹ : AddCommGroup M
inst✝ : Module R M
I : Ideal R
N : Submodule R M
s : Set M
hfs : Set.Finite s
this : ∃ r, r - 1 ∈ I ∧ N ≤ comap ((LinearMap.lsmul R M) r) (I • span R s) ∧ s ⊆ ↑N
⊢ ∃ r, r - 1 ∈ I ∧ ∀ n ∈ N, r • n = 0

Next tactic:
revert this
/-- **Nakayama's Lemma**. Atiyah-Macdonald 2.5, Eisenbud 4.7, Matsumura 2.2,
[Stacks 00DV](https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/00DV) -/
theorem exists_sub_one_mem_and_smul_eq_zero_of_fg_of_le_smul {R : Type*} [CommRing R] {M : Type*}
    [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] (I : Ideal R) (N : Submodule R M) (hn : N.FG) (hin : N ≤ I • N) :
    ∃ r : R, r - 1 ∈ I ∧ ∀ n ∈ N, r • n = (0 : M) := by
  rw [fg_def] at hn
  rcases hn with ⟨s, hfs, hs⟩
  have : ∃ r : R, r - 1 ∈ I ∧ N ≤ (I • span R s).comap (LinearMap.lsmul R M r) ∧ s ⊆ N := by
    refine' ⟨1, _, _, _⟩
    · rw [sub_self]
      exact I.zero_mem
    · rw [hs]
      intro n hn
      rw [mem_comap]
      change (1 : R) • n ∈ I • N
      rw [one_smul]
      exact hin hn
    · rw [← span_le, hs]
  clear hin hs
  revert this
  

Proof state:
case intro.intro
R✝ : Type u_1
M✝ : Type u_2
inst✝⁵ : Semiring R✝
inst✝⁴ : AddCommMonoid M✝
inst✝³ : Module R✝ M✝
R : Type u_3
inst✝² : CommRing R
M : Type u_4
inst✝¹ : AddCommGroup M
inst✝ : Module R M
I : Ideal R
N : Submodule R M
s : Set M
hfs : Set.Finite s
⊢ (∃ r, r - 1 ∈ I ∧ N ≤ comap ((LinearMap.lsmul R M) r) (I • span R s) ∧ s ⊆ ↑N) → ∃ r, r - 1 ∈ I ∧ ∀ n ∈ N, r • n = 0

Next tactic:
refine' Set.Finite.dinduction_on _ hfs (fun H => _) @fun i s _ _ ih H => _
/-- **Nakayama's Lemma**. Atiyah-Macdonald 2.5, Eisenbud 4.7, Matsumura 2.2,
[Stacks 00DV](https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/00DV) -/
theorem exists_sub_one_mem_and_smul_eq_zero_of_fg_of_le_smul {R : Type*} [CommRing R] {M : Type*}
    [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] (I : Ideal R) (N : Submodule R M) (hn : N.FG) (hin : N ≤ I • N) :
    ∃ r : R, r - 1 ∈ I ∧ ∀ n ∈ N, r • n = (0 : M) := by
  rw [fg_def] at hn
  rcases hn with ⟨s, hfs, hs⟩
  have : ∃ r : R, r - 1 ∈ I ∧ N ≤ (I • span R s).comap (LinearMap.lsmul R M r) ∧ s ⊆ N := by
    refine' ⟨1, _, _, _⟩
    · rw [sub_self]
      exact I.zero_mem
    · rw [hs]
      intro n hn
      rw [mem_comap]
      change (1 : R) • n ∈ I • N
      rw [one_smul]
      exact hin hn
    · rw [← span_le, hs]
  clear hin hs
  revert this
  refine' Set.Finite.dinduction_on _ hfs (fun H => _) @fun i s _ _ ih H => _
  · 

Proof state:
case intro.intro.refine'_1
R✝ : Type u_1
M✝ : Type u_2
inst✝⁵ : Semiring R✝
inst✝⁴ : AddCommMonoid M✝
inst✝³ : Module R✝ M✝
R : Type u_3
inst✝² : CommRing R
M : Type u_4
inst✝¹ : AddCommGroup M
inst✝ : Module R M
I : Ideal R
N : Submodule R M
s : Set M
hfs : Set.Finite s
H : ∃ r, r - 1 ∈ I ∧ N ≤ comap ((LinearMap.lsmul R M) r) (I • span R ∅) ∧ ∅ ⊆ ↑N
⊢ ∃ r, r - 1 ∈ I ∧ ∀ n ∈ N, r • n = 0

Next tactic:
rcases H with ⟨r, hr1, hrn, _⟩
/-- **Nakayama's Lemma**. Atiyah-Macdonald 2.5, Eisenbud 4.7, Matsumura 2.2,
[Stacks 00DV](https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/00DV) -/
theorem exists_sub_one_mem_and_smul_eq_zero_of_fg_of_le_smul {R : Type*} [CommRing R] {M : Type*}
    [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] (I : Ideal R) (N : Submodule R M) (hn : N.FG) (hin : N ≤ I • N) :
    ∃ r : R, r - 1 ∈ I ∧ ∀ n ∈ N, r • n = (0 : M) := by
  rw [fg_def] at hn
  rcases hn with ⟨s, hfs, hs⟩
  have : ∃ r : R, r - 1 ∈ I ∧ N ≤ (I • span R s).comap (LinearMap.lsmul R M r) ∧ s ⊆ N := by
    refine' ⟨1, _, _, _⟩
    · rw [sub_self]
      exact I.zero_mem
    · rw [hs]
      intro n hn
      rw [mem_comap]
      change (1 : R) • n ∈ I • N
      rw [one_smul]
      exact hin hn
    · rw [← span_le, hs]
  clear hin hs
  revert this
  refine' Set.Finite.dinduction_on _ hfs (fun H => _) @fun i s _ _ ih H => _
  · rcases H with ⟨r, hr1, hrn, _⟩
    

Proof state:
case intro.intro.refine'_1.intro.intro.intro
R✝ : Type u_1
M✝ : Type u_2
inst✝⁵ : Semiring R✝
inst✝⁴ : AddCommMonoid M✝
inst✝³ : Module R✝ M✝
R : Type u_3
inst✝² : CommRing R
M : Type u_4
inst✝¹ : AddCommGroup M
inst✝ : Module R M
I : Ideal R
N : Submodule R M
s : Set M
hfs : Set.Finite s
r : R
hr1 : r - 1 ∈ I
hrn : N ≤ comap ((LinearMap.lsmul R M) r) (I • span R ∅)
right✝ : ∅ ⊆ ↑N
⊢ ∃ r, r - 1 ∈ I ∧ ∀ n ∈ N, r • n = 0

Next tactic:
refine' ⟨r, hr1, fun n hn => _⟩