l3lab/ntp-mathlib huggingface dataset:
theorem isEquiv_iff_val_eq_one [LinearOrderedCommGroupWithZero Γ₀]
    [LinearOrderedCommGroupWithZero Γ'₀] (v : Valuation K Γ₀) (v' : Valuation K Γ'₀) :
    v.IsEquiv v' ↔ ∀ {x : K}, v x = 1 ↔ v' x = 1 := by
  constructor
  · intro h x
    simpa using @IsEquiv.val_eq _ _ _ _ _ _ v v' h x 1
  · intro h
    apply isEquiv_of_val_le_one
    intro x
    constructor
    · intro hx
      rcases lt_or_eq_of_le hx with hx' | hx'
      · have : v (1 + x) = 1 := by
          rw [← v.map_one]
          apply map_add_eq_of_lt_left
          simpa
        rw [h] at this
        rw [show x = -1 + (1 + x) by simp]
        refine' le_trans (v'.map_add _ _) _
        simp [this]
      · rw [h] at hx'
        exact le_of_eq hx'
    · intro hx
      rcases lt_or_eq_of_le hx with hx' | hx'
      · have : v' (1 + x) = 1 := by
          rw [← v'.map_one]
          

Proof state:
K : Type u_1
F : Type u_2
R : Type u_3
inst✝³ : DivisionRing K
Γ₀ : Type u_4
Γ'₀ : Type u_5
Γ''₀ : Type u_6
inst✝² : LinearOrderedCommMonoidWithZero Γ''₀
inst✝¹ : LinearOrderedCommGroupWithZero Γ₀
inst✝ : LinearOrderedCommGroupWithZero Γ'₀
v : Valuation K Γ₀
v' : Valuation K Γ'₀
h : ∀ {x : K}, v x = 1 ↔ v' x = 1
x : K
hx : v' x ≤ 1
hx' : v' x < 1
⊢ v' (1 + x) = v' 1

Next tactic:
apply map_add_eq_of_lt_left
theorem isEquiv_iff_val_eq_one [LinearOrderedCommGroupWithZero Γ₀]
    [LinearOrderedCommGroupWithZero Γ'₀] (v : Valuation K Γ₀) (v' : Valuation K Γ'₀) :
    v.IsEquiv v' ↔ ∀ {x : K}, v x = 1 ↔ v' x = 1 := by
  constructor
  · intro h x
    simpa using @IsEquiv.val_eq _ _ _ _ _ _ v v' h x 1
  · intro h
    apply isEquiv_of_val_le_one
    intro x
    constructor
    · intro hx
      rcases lt_or_eq_of_le hx with hx' | hx'
      · have : v (1 + x) = 1 := by
          rw [← v.map_one]
          apply map_add_eq_of_lt_left
          simpa
        rw [h] at this
        rw [show x = -1 + (1 + x) by simp]
        refine' le_trans (v'.map_add _ _) _
        simp [this]
      · rw [h] at hx'
        exact le_of_eq hx'
    · intro hx
      rcases lt_or_eq_of_le hx with hx' | hx'
      · have : v' (1 + x) = 1 := by
          rw [← v'.map_one]
          apply map_add_eq_of_lt_left
          

Proof state:
case h
K : Type u_1
F : Type u_2
R : Type u_3
inst✝³ : DivisionRing K
Γ₀ : Type u_4
Γ'₀ : Type u_5
Γ''₀ : Type u_6
inst✝² : LinearOrderedCommMonoidWithZero Γ''₀
inst✝¹ : LinearOrderedCommGroupWithZero Γ₀
inst✝ : LinearOrderedCommGroupWithZero Γ'₀
v : Valuation K Γ₀
v' : Valuation K Γ'₀
h : ∀ {x : K}, v x = 1 ↔ v' x = 1
x : K
hx : v' x ≤ 1
hx' : v' x < 1
⊢ v' x < v' 1

Next tactic:
simpa
theorem isEquiv_iff_val_eq_one [LinearOrderedCommGroupWithZero Γ₀]
    [LinearOrderedCommGroupWithZero Γ'₀] (v : Valuation K Γ₀) (v' : Valuation K Γ'₀) :
    v.IsEquiv v' ↔ ∀ {x : K}, v x = 1 ↔ v' x = 1 := by
  constructor
  · intro h x
    simpa using @IsEquiv.val_eq _ _ _ _ _ _ v v' h x 1
  · intro h
    apply isEquiv_of_val_le_one
    intro x
    constructor
    · intro hx
      rcases lt_or_eq_of_le hx with hx' | hx'
      · have : v (1 + x) = 1 := by
          rw [← v.map_one]
          apply map_add_eq_of_lt_left
          simpa
        rw [h] at this
        rw [show x = -1 + (1 + x) by simp]
        refine' le_trans (v'.map_add _ _) _
        simp [this]
      · rw [h] at hx'
        exact le_of_eq hx'
    · intro hx
      rcases lt_or_eq_of_le hx with hx' | hx'
      · have : v' (1 + x) = 1 := by
          rw [← v'.map_one]
          apply map_add_eq_of_lt_left
          simpa
        

Proof state:
case mpr.h.mpr.inl
K : Type u_1
F : Type u_2
R : Type u_3
inst✝³ : DivisionRing K
Γ₀ : Type u_4
Γ'₀ : Type u_5
Γ''₀ : Type u_6
inst✝² : LinearOrderedCommMonoidWithZero Γ''₀
inst✝¹ : LinearOrderedCommGroupWithZero Γ₀
inst✝ : LinearOrderedCommGroupWithZero Γ'₀
v : Valuation K Γ₀
v' : Valuation K Γ'₀
h : ∀ {x : K}, v x = 1 ↔ v' x = 1
x : K
hx : v' x ≤ 1
hx' : v' x < 1
this : v' (1 + x) = 1
⊢ v x ≤ 1

Next tactic:
rw [← h] at this
theorem isEquiv_iff_val_eq_one [LinearOrderedCommGroupWithZero Γ₀]
    [LinearOrderedCommGroupWithZero Γ'₀] (v : Valuation K Γ₀) (v' : Valuation K Γ'₀) :
    v.IsEquiv v' ↔ ∀ {x : K}, v x = 1 ↔ v' x = 1 := by
  constructor
  · intro h x
    simpa using @IsEquiv.val_eq _ _ _ _ _ _ v v' h x 1
  · intro h
    apply isEquiv_of_val_le_one
    intro x
    constructor
    · intro hx
      rcases lt_or_eq_of_le hx with hx' | hx'
      · have : v (1 + x) = 1 := by
          rw [← v.map_one]
          apply map_add_eq_of_lt_left
          simpa
        rw [h] at this
        rw [show x = -1 + (1 + x) by simp]
        refine' le_trans (v'.map_add _ _) _
        simp [this]
      · rw [h] at hx'
        exact le_of_eq hx'
    · intro hx
      rcases lt_or_eq_of_le hx with hx' | hx'
      · have : v' (1 + x) = 1 := by
          rw [← v'.map_one]
          apply map_add_eq_of_lt_left
          simpa
        rw [← h] at this
        

Proof state:
case mpr.h.mpr.inl
K : Type u_1
F : Type u_2
R : Type u_3
inst✝³ : DivisionRing K
Γ₀ : Type u_4
Γ'₀ : Type u_5
Γ''₀ : Type u_6
inst✝² : LinearOrderedCommMonoidWithZero Γ''₀
inst✝¹ : LinearOrderedCommGroupWithZero Γ₀
inst✝ : LinearOrderedCommGroupWithZero Γ'₀
v : Valuation K Γ₀
v' : Valuation K Γ'₀
h : ∀ {x : K}, v x = 1 ↔ v' x = 1
x : K
hx : v' x ≤ 1
hx' : v' x < 1
this : v (1 + x) = 1
⊢ v x ≤ 1

Next tactic:
rw [show x = -1 + (1 + x) by simp]
theorem isEquiv_iff_val_eq_one [LinearOrderedCommGroupWithZero Γ₀]
    [LinearOrderedCommGroupWithZero Γ'₀] (v : Valuation K Γ₀) (v' : Valuation K Γ'₀) :
    v.IsEquiv v' ↔ ∀ {x : K}, v x = 1 ↔ v' x = 1 := by
  constructor
  · intro h x
    simpa using @IsEquiv.val_eq _ _ _ _ _ _ v v' h x 1
  · intro h
    apply isEquiv_of_val_le_one
    intro x
    constructor
    · intro hx
      rcases lt_or_eq_of_le hx with hx' | hx'
      · have : v (1 + x) = 1 := by
          rw [← v.map_one]
          apply map_add_eq_of_lt_left
          simpa
        rw [h] at this
        rw [show x = -1 + (1 + x) by simp]
        refine' le_trans (v'.map_add _ _) _
        simp [this]
      · rw [h] at hx'
        exact le_of_eq hx'
    · intro hx
      rcases lt_or_eq_of_le hx with hx' | hx'
      · have : v' (1 + x) = 1 := by
          rw [← v'.map_one]
          apply map_add_eq_of_lt_left
          simpa
        rw [← h] at this
        rw [show x = -1 + (1 + x) by 

Proof state:
K : Type u_1
F : Type u_2
R : Type u_3
inst✝³ : DivisionRing K
Γ₀ : Type u_4
Γ'₀ : Type u_5
Γ''₀ : Type u_6
inst✝² : LinearOrderedCommMonoidWithZero Γ''₀
inst✝¹ : LinearOrderedCommGroupWithZero Γ₀
inst✝ : LinearOrderedCommGroupWithZero Γ'₀
v : Valuation K Γ₀
v' : Valuation K Γ'₀
h : ∀ {x : K}, v x = 1 ↔ v' x = 1
x : K
hx : v' x ≤ 1
hx' : v' x < 1
this : v (1 + x) = 1
⊢ x = -1 + (1 + x)

Next tactic:
simp
theorem isEquiv_iff_val_eq_one [LinearOrderedCommGroupWithZero Γ₀]
    [LinearOrderedCommGroupWithZero Γ'₀] (v : Valuation K Γ₀) (v' : Valuation K Γ'₀) :
    v.IsEquiv v' ↔ ∀ {x : K}, v x = 1 ↔ v' x = 1 := by
  constructor
  · intro h x
    simpa using @IsEquiv.val_eq _ _ _ _ _ _ v v' h x 1
  · intro h
    apply isEquiv_of_val_le_one
    intro x
    constructor
    · intro hx
      rcases lt_or_eq_of_le hx with hx' | hx'
      · have : v (1 + x) = 1 := by
          rw [← v.map_one]
          apply map_add_eq_of_lt_left
          simpa
        rw [h] at this
        rw [show x = -1 + (1 + x) by simp]
        refine' le_trans (v'.map_add _ _) _
        simp [this]
      · rw [h] at hx'
        exact le_of_eq hx'
    · intro hx
      rcases lt_or_eq_of_le hx with hx' | hx'
      · have : v' (1 + x) = 1 := by
          rw [← v'.map_one]
          apply map_add_eq_of_lt_left
          simpa
        rw [← h] at this
        rw [show x = -1 + (1 + x) by simp]
        

Proof state:
case mpr.h.mpr.inl
K : Type u_1
F : Type u_2
R : Type u_3
inst✝³ : DivisionRing K
Γ₀ : Type u_4
Γ'₀ : Type u_5
Γ''₀ : Type u_6
inst✝² : LinearOrderedCommMonoidWithZero Γ''₀
inst✝¹ : LinearOrderedCommGroupWithZero Γ₀
inst✝ : LinearOrderedCommGroupWithZero Γ'₀
v : Valuation K Γ₀
v' : Valuation K Γ'₀
h : ∀ {x : K}, v x = 1 ↔ v' x = 1
x : K
hx : v' x ≤ 1
hx' : v' x < 1
this : v (1 + x) = 1
⊢ v (-1 + (1 + x)) ≤ 1

Next tactic:
refine' le_trans (v.map_add _ _) _
theorem isEquiv_iff_val_eq_one [LinearOrderedCommGroupWithZero Γ₀]
    [LinearOrderedCommGroupWithZero Γ'₀] (v : Valuation K Γ₀) (v' : Valuation K Γ'₀) :
    v.IsEquiv v' ↔ ∀ {x : K}, v x = 1 ↔ v' x = 1 := by
  constructor
  · intro h x
    simpa using @IsEquiv.val_eq _ _ _ _ _ _ v v' h x 1
  · intro h
    apply isEquiv_of_val_le_one
    intro x
    constructor
    · intro hx
      rcases lt_or_eq_of_le hx with hx' | hx'
      · have : v (1 + x) = 1 := by
          rw [← v.map_one]
          apply map_add_eq_of_lt_left
          simpa
        rw [h] at this
        rw [show x = -1 + (1 + x) by simp]
        refine' le_trans (v'.map_add _ _) _
        simp [this]
      · rw [h] at hx'
        exact le_of_eq hx'
    · intro hx
      rcases lt_or_eq_of_le hx with hx' | hx'
      · have : v' (1 + x) = 1 := by
          rw [← v'.map_one]
          apply map_add_eq_of_lt_left
          simpa
        rw [← h] at this
        rw [show x = -1 + (1 + x) by simp]
        refine' le_trans (v.map_add _ _) _
        

Proof state:
case mpr.h.mpr.inl
K : Type u_1
F : Type u_2
R : Type u_3
inst✝³ : DivisionRing K
Γ₀ : Type u_4
Γ'₀ : Type u_5
Γ''₀ : Type u_6
inst✝² : LinearOrderedCommMonoidWithZero Γ''₀
inst✝¹ : LinearOrderedCommGroupWithZero Γ₀
inst✝ : LinearOrderedCommGroupWithZero Γ'₀
v : Valuation K Γ₀
v' : Valuation K Γ'₀
h : ∀ {x : K}, v x = 1 ↔ v' x = 1
x : K
hx : v' x ≤ 1
hx' : v' x < 1
this : v (1 + x) = 1
⊢ max (v (-1)) (v (1 + x)) ≤ 1

Next tactic:
simp [this]
theorem isEquiv_iff_val_eq_one [LinearOrderedCommGroupWithZero Γ₀]
    [LinearOrderedCommGroupWithZero Γ'₀] (v : Valuation K Γ₀) (v' : Valuation K Γ'₀) :
    v.IsEquiv v' ↔ ∀ {x : K}, v x = 1 ↔ v' x = 1 := by
  constructor
  · intro h x
    simpa using @IsEquiv.val_eq _ _ _ _ _ _ v v' h x 1
  · intro h
    apply isEquiv_of_val_le_one
    intro x
    constructor
    · intro hx
      rcases lt_or_eq_of_le hx with hx' | hx'
      · have : v (1 + x) = 1 := by
          rw [← v.map_one]
          apply map_add_eq_of_lt_left
          simpa
        rw [h] at this
        rw [show x = -1 + (1 + x) by simp]
        refine' le_trans (v'.map_add _ _) _
        simp [this]
      · rw [h] at hx'
        exact le_of_eq hx'
    · intro hx
      rcases lt_or_eq_of_le hx with hx' | hx'
      · have : v' (1 + x) = 1 := by
          rw [← v'.map_one]
          apply map_add_eq_of_lt_left
          simpa
        rw [← h] at this
        rw [show x = -1 + (1 + x) by simp]
        refine' le_trans (v.map_add _ _) _
        simp [this]
      · 

Proof state:
case mpr.h.mpr.inr
K : Type u_1
F : Type u_2
R : Type u_3
inst✝³ : DivisionRing K
Γ₀ : Type u_4
Γ'₀ : Type u_5
Γ''₀ : Type u_6
inst✝² : LinearOrderedCommMonoidWithZero Γ''₀
inst✝¹ : LinearOrderedCommGroupWithZero Γ₀
inst✝ : LinearOrderedCommGroupWithZero Γ'₀
v : Valuation K Γ₀
v' : Valuation K Γ'₀
h : ∀ {x : K}, v x = 1 ↔ v' x = 1
x : K
hx : v' x ≤ 1
hx' : v' x = 1
⊢ v x ≤ 1

Next tactic:
rw [← h] at hx'
theorem isEquiv_iff_val_eq_one [LinearOrderedCommGroupWithZero Γ₀]
    [LinearOrderedCommGroupWithZero Γ'₀] (v : Valuation K Γ₀) (v' : Valuation K Γ'₀) :
    v.IsEquiv v' ↔ ∀ {x : K}, v x = 1 ↔ v' x = 1 := by
  constructor
  · intro h x
    simpa using @IsEquiv.val_eq _ _ _ _ _ _ v v' h x 1
  · intro h
    apply isEquiv_of_val_le_one
    intro x
    constructor
    · intro hx
      rcases lt_or_eq_of_le hx with hx' | hx'
      · have : v (1 + x) = 1 := by
          rw [← v.map_one]
          apply map_add_eq_of_lt_left
          simpa
        rw [h] at this
        rw [show x = -1 + (1 + x) by simp]
        refine' le_trans (v'.map_add _ _) _
        simp [this]
      · rw [h] at hx'
        exact le_of_eq hx'
    · intro hx
      rcases lt_or_eq_of_le hx with hx' | hx'
      · have : v' (1 + x) = 1 := by
          rw [← v'.map_one]
          apply map_add_eq_of_lt_left
          simpa
        rw [← h] at this
        rw [show x = -1 + (1 + x) by simp]
        refine' le_trans (v.map_add _ _) _
        simp [this]
      · rw [← h] at hx'
        

Proof state:
case mpr.h.mpr.inr
K : Type u_1
F : Type u_2
R : Type u_3
inst✝³ : DivisionRing K
Γ₀ : Type u_4
Γ'₀ : Type u_5
Γ''₀ : Type u_6
inst✝² : LinearOrderedCommMonoidWithZero Γ''₀
inst✝¹ : LinearOrderedCommGroupWithZero Γ₀
inst✝ : LinearOrderedCommGroupWithZero Γ'₀
v : Valuation K Γ₀
v' : Valuation K Γ'₀
h : ∀ {x : K}, v x = 1 ↔ v' x = 1
x : K
hx : v' x ≤ 1
hx' : v x = 1
⊢ v x ≤ 1

Next tactic:
exact le_of_eq hx'
theorem isEquiv_iff_val_lt_one [LinearOrderedCommGroupWithZero Γ₀]
    [LinearOrderedCommGroupWithZero Γ'₀] (v : Valuation K Γ₀) (v' : Valuation K Γ'₀) :
    v.IsEquiv v' ↔ ∀ {x : K}, v x < 1 ↔ v' x < 1 := by
  

Proof state:
K : Type u_1
F : Type u_2
R : Type u_3
inst✝³ : DivisionRing K
Γ₀ : Type u_4
Γ'₀ : Type u_5
Γ''₀ : Type u_6
inst✝² : LinearOrderedCommMonoidWithZero Γ''₀
inst✝¹ : LinearOrderedCommGroupWithZero Γ₀
inst✝ : LinearOrderedCommGroupWithZero Γ'₀
v : Valuation K Γ₀
v' : Valuation K Γ'₀
⊢ IsEquiv v v' ↔ ∀ {x : K}, v x < 1 ↔ v' x < 1

Next tactic:
constructor
theorem isEquiv_iff_val_lt_one [LinearOrderedCommGroupWithZero Γ₀]
    [LinearOrderedCommGroupWithZero Γ'₀] (v : Valuation K Γ₀) (v' : Valuation K Γ'₀) :
    v.IsEquiv v' ↔ ∀ {x : K}, v x < 1 ↔ v' x < 1 := by
  constructor
  · 

Proof state:
case mp
K : Type u_1
F : Type u_2
R : Type u_3
inst✝³ : DivisionRing K
Γ₀ : Type u_4
Γ'₀ : Type u_5
Γ''₀ : Type u_6
inst✝² : LinearOrderedCommMonoidWithZero Γ''₀
inst✝¹ : LinearOrderedCommGroupWithZero Γ₀
inst✝ : LinearOrderedCommGroupWithZero Γ'₀
v : Valuation K Γ₀
v' : Valuation K Γ'₀
⊢ IsEquiv v v' → ∀ {x : K}, v x < 1 ↔ v' x < 1

Next tactic:
intro h x
theorem isEquiv_iff_val_lt_one [LinearOrderedCommGroupWithZero Γ₀]
    [LinearOrderedCommGroupWithZero Γ'₀] (v : Valuation K Γ₀) (v' : Valuation K Γ'₀) :
    v.IsEquiv v' ↔ ∀ {x : K}, v x < 1 ↔ v' x < 1 := by
  constructor
  · intro h x
    

Proof state:
case mp
K : Type u_1
F : Type u_2
R : Type u_3
inst✝³ : DivisionRing K
Γ₀ : Type u_4
Γ'₀ : Type u_5
Γ''₀ : Type u_6
inst✝² : LinearOrderedCommMonoidWithZero Γ''₀
inst✝¹ : LinearOrderedCommGroupWithZero Γ₀
inst✝ : LinearOrderedCommGroupWithZero Γ'₀
v : Valuation K Γ₀
v' : Valuation K Γ'₀
h : IsEquiv v v'
x : K
⊢ v x < 1 ↔ v' x < 1

Next tactic:
simp only [lt_iff_le_and_ne,
      and_congr ((isEquiv_iff_val_le_one _ _).1 h) ((isEquiv_iff_val_eq_one _ _).1 h).not]
theorem isEquiv_iff_val_lt_one [LinearOrderedCommGroupWithZero Γ₀]
    [LinearOrderedCommGroupWithZero Γ'₀] (v : Valuation K Γ₀) (v' : Valuation K Γ'₀) :
    v.IsEquiv v' ↔ ∀ {x : K}, v x < 1 ↔ v' x < 1 := by
  constructor
  · intro h x
    simp only [lt_iff_le_and_ne,
      and_congr ((isEquiv_iff_val_le_one _ _).1 h) ((isEquiv_iff_val_eq_one _ _).1 h).not]
  · 

Proof state:
case mpr
K : Type u_1
F : Type u_2
R : Type u_3
inst✝³ : DivisionRing K
Γ₀ : Type u_4
Γ'₀ : Type u_5
Γ''₀ : Type u_6
inst✝² : LinearOrderedCommMonoidWithZero Γ''₀
inst✝¹ : LinearOrderedCommGroupWithZero Γ₀
inst✝ : LinearOrderedCommGroupWithZero Γ'₀
v : Valuation K Γ₀
v' : Valuation K Γ'₀
⊢ (∀ {x : K}, v x < 1 ↔ v' x < 1) → IsEquiv v v'

Next tactic:
rw [isEquiv_iff_val_eq_one]
theorem isEquiv_iff_val_lt_one [LinearOrderedCommGroupWithZero Γ₀]
    [LinearOrderedCommGroupWithZero Γ'₀] (v : Valuation K Γ₀) (v' : Valuation K Γ'₀) :
    v.IsEquiv v' ↔ ∀ {x : K}, v x < 1 ↔ v' x < 1 := by
  constructor
  · intro h x
    simp only [lt_iff_le_and_ne,
      and_congr ((isEquiv_iff_val_le_one _ _).1 h) ((isEquiv_iff_val_eq_one _ _).1 h).not]
  · rw [isEquiv_iff_val_eq_one]
    

Proof state:
case mpr
K : Type u_1
F : Type u_2
R : Type u_3
inst✝³ : DivisionRing K
Γ₀ : Type u_4
Γ'₀ : Type u_5
Γ''₀ : Type u_6
inst✝² : LinearOrderedCommMonoidWithZero Γ''₀
inst✝¹ : LinearOrderedCommGroupWithZero Γ₀
inst✝ : LinearOrderedCommGroupWithZero Γ'₀
v : Valuation K Γ₀
v' : Valuation K Γ'₀
⊢ (∀ {x : K}, v x < 1 ↔ v' x < 1) → ∀ {x : K}, v x = 1 ↔ v' x = 1

Next tactic:
intro h x
theorem isEquiv_iff_val_lt_one [LinearOrderedCommGroupWithZero Γ₀]
    [LinearOrderedCommGroupWithZero Γ'₀] (v : Valuation K Γ₀) (v' : Valuation K Γ'₀) :
    v.IsEquiv v' ↔ ∀ {x : K}, v x < 1 ↔ v' x < 1 := by
  constructor
  · intro h x
    simp only [lt_iff_le_and_ne,
      and_congr ((isEquiv_iff_val_le_one _ _).1 h) ((isEquiv_iff_val_eq_one _ _).1 h).not]
  · rw [isEquiv_iff_val_eq_one]
    intro h x
    

Proof state:
case mpr
K : Type u_1
F : Type u_2
R : Type u_3
inst✝³ : DivisionRing K
Γ₀ : Type u_4
Γ'₀ : Type u_5
Γ''₀ : Type u_6
inst✝² : LinearOrderedCommMonoidWithZero Γ''₀
inst✝¹ : LinearOrderedCommGroupWithZero Γ₀
inst✝ : LinearOrderedCommGroupWithZero Γ'₀
v : Valuation K Γ₀
v' : Valuation K Γ'₀
h : ∀ {x : K}, v x < 1 ↔ v' x < 1
x : K
⊢ v x = 1 ↔ v' x = 1

Next tactic:
by_cases hx : x = 0
theorem isEquiv_iff_val_lt_one [LinearOrderedCommGroupWithZero Γ₀]
    [LinearOrderedCommGroupWithZero Γ'₀] (v : Valuation K Γ₀) (v' : Valuation K Γ'₀) :
    v.IsEquiv v' ↔ ∀ {x : K}, v x < 1 ↔ v' x < 1 := by
  constructor
  · intro h x
    simp only [lt_iff_le_and_ne,
      and_congr ((isEquiv_iff_val_le_one _ _).1 h) ((isEquiv_iff_val_eq_one _ _).1 h).not]
  · rw [isEquiv_iff_val_eq_one]
    intro h x
    by_cases hx : x = 0
    · -- porting note: this proof was `simp only [(zero_iff _).2 hx, zero_ne_one]`
      

Proof state:
case pos
K : Type u_1
F : Type u_2
R : Type u_3
inst✝³ : DivisionRing K
Γ₀ : Type u_4
Γ'₀ : Type u_5
Γ''₀ : Type u_6
inst✝² : LinearOrderedCommMonoidWithZero Γ''₀
inst✝¹ : LinearOrderedCommGroupWithZero Γ₀
inst✝ : LinearOrderedCommGroupWithZero Γ'₀
v : Valuation K Γ₀
v' : Valuation K Γ'₀
h : ∀ {x : K}, v x < 1 ↔ v' x < 1
x : K
hx : x = 0
⊢ v x = 1 ↔ v' x = 1

Next tactic:
rw [(zero_iff _).2 hx, (zero_iff _).2 hx]
theorem isEquiv_iff_val_lt_one [LinearOrderedCommGroupWithZero Γ₀]
    [LinearOrderedCommGroupWithZero Γ'₀] (v : Valuation K Γ₀) (v' : Valuation K Γ'₀) :
    v.IsEquiv v' ↔ ∀ {x : K}, v x < 1 ↔ v' x < 1 := by
  constructor
  · intro h x
    simp only [lt_iff_le_and_ne,
      and_congr ((isEquiv_iff_val_le_one _ _).1 h) ((isEquiv_iff_val_eq_one _ _).1 h).not]
  · rw [isEquiv_iff_val_eq_one]
    intro h x
    by_cases hx : x = 0
    · -- porting note: this proof was `simp only [(zero_iff _).2 hx, zero_ne_one]`
      rw [(zero_iff _).2 hx, (zero_iff _).2 hx]
      

Proof state:
case pos
K : Type u_1
F : Type u_2
R : Type u_3
inst✝³ : DivisionRing K
Γ₀ : Type u_4
Γ'₀ : Type u_5
Γ''₀ : Type u_6
inst✝² : LinearOrderedCommMonoidWithZero Γ''₀
inst✝¹ : LinearOrderedCommGroupWithZero Γ₀
inst✝ : LinearOrderedCommGroupWithZero Γ'₀
v : Valuation K Γ₀
v' : Valuation K Γ'₀
h : ∀ {x : K}, v x < 1 ↔ v' x < 1
x : K
hx : x = 0
⊢ 0 = 1 ↔ 0 = 1

Next tactic:
simp only [zero_ne_one]
theorem isEquiv_iff_val_lt_one [LinearOrderedCommGroupWithZero Γ₀]
    [LinearOrderedCommGroupWithZero Γ'₀] (v : Valuation K Γ₀) (v' : Valuation K Γ'₀) :
    v.IsEquiv v' ↔ ∀ {x : K}, v x < 1 ↔ v' x < 1 := by
  constructor
  · intro h x
    simp only [lt_iff_le_and_ne,
      and_congr ((isEquiv_iff_val_le_one _ _).1 h) ((isEquiv_iff_val_eq_one _ _).1 h).not]
  · rw [isEquiv_iff_val_eq_one]
    intro h x
    by_cases hx : x = 0
    · -- porting note: this proof was `simp only [(zero_iff _).2 hx, zero_ne_one]`
      rw [(zero_iff _).2 hx, (zero_iff _).2 hx]
      simp only [zero_ne_one]
    

Proof state:
case neg
K : Type u_1
F : Type u_2
R : Type u_3
inst✝³ : DivisionRing K
Γ₀ : Type u_4
Γ'₀ : Type u_5
Γ''₀ : Type u_6
inst✝² : LinearOrderedCommMonoidWithZero Γ''₀
inst✝¹ : LinearOrderedCommGroupWithZero Γ₀
inst✝ : LinearOrderedCommGroupWithZero Γ'₀
v : Valuation K Γ₀
v' : Valuation K Γ'₀
h : ∀ {x : K}, v x < 1 ↔ v' x < 1
x : K
hx : ¬x = 0
⊢ v x = 1 ↔ v' x = 1

Next tactic:
constructor
theorem isEquiv_iff_val_lt_one [LinearOrderedCommGroupWithZero Γ₀]
    [LinearOrderedCommGroupWithZero Γ'₀] (v : Valuation K Γ₀) (v' : Valuation K Γ'₀) :
    v.IsEquiv v' ↔ ∀ {x : K}, v x < 1 ↔ v' x < 1 := by
  constructor
  · intro h x
    simp only [lt_iff_le_and_ne,
      and_congr ((isEquiv_iff_val_le_one _ _).1 h) ((isEquiv_iff_val_eq_one _ _).1 h).not]
  · rw [isEquiv_iff_val_eq_one]
    intro h x
    by_cases hx : x = 0
    · -- porting note: this proof was `simp only [(zero_iff _).2 hx, zero_ne_one]`
      rw [(zero_iff _).2 hx, (zero_iff _).2 hx]
      simp only [zero_ne_one]
    constructor
    · 

Proof state:
case neg.mp
K : Type u_1
F : Type u_2
R : Type u_3
inst✝³ : DivisionRing K
Γ₀ : Type u_4
Γ'₀ : Type u_5
Γ''₀ : Type u_6
inst✝² : LinearOrderedCommMonoidWithZero Γ''₀
inst✝¹ : LinearOrderedCommGroupWithZero Γ₀
inst✝ : LinearOrderedCommGroupWithZero Γ'₀
v : Valuation K Γ₀
v' : Valuation K Γ'₀
h : ∀ {x : K}, v x < 1 ↔ v' x < 1
x : K
hx : ¬x = 0
⊢ v x = 1 → v' x = 1

Next tactic:
intro hh
theorem isEquiv_iff_val_lt_one [LinearOrderedCommGroupWithZero Γ₀]
    [LinearOrderedCommGroupWithZero Γ'₀] (v : Valuation K Γ₀) (v' : Valuation K Γ'₀) :
    v.IsEquiv v' ↔ ∀ {x : K}, v x < 1 ↔ v' x < 1 := by
  constructor
  · intro h x
    simp only [lt_iff_le_and_ne,
      and_congr ((isEquiv_iff_val_le_one _ _).1 h) ((isEquiv_iff_val_eq_one _ _).1 h).not]
  · rw [isEquiv_iff_val_eq_one]
    intro h x
    by_cases hx : x = 0
    · -- porting note: this proof was `simp only [(zero_iff _).2 hx, zero_ne_one]`
      rw [(zero_iff _).2 hx, (zero_iff _).2 hx]
      simp only [zero_ne_one]
    constructor
    · intro hh
      

Proof state:
case neg.mp
K : Type u_1
F : Type u_2
R : Type u_3
inst✝³ : DivisionRing K
Γ₀ : Type u_4
Γ'₀ : Type u_5
Γ''₀ : Type u_6
inst✝² : LinearOrderedCommMonoidWithZero Γ''₀
inst✝¹ : LinearOrderedCommGroupWithZero Γ₀
inst✝ : LinearOrderedCommGroupWithZero Γ'₀
v : Valuation K Γ₀
v' : Valuation K Γ'₀
h : ∀ {x : K}, v x < 1 ↔ v' x < 1
x : K
hx : ¬x = 0
hh : v x = 1
⊢ v' x = 1

Next tactic:
by_contra h_1
theorem isEquiv_iff_val_lt_one [LinearOrderedCommGroupWithZero Γ₀]
    [LinearOrderedCommGroupWithZero Γ'₀] (v : Valuation K Γ₀) (v' : Valuation K Γ'₀) :
    v.IsEquiv v' ↔ ∀ {x : K}, v x < 1 ↔ v' x < 1 := by
  constructor
  · intro h x
    simp only [lt_iff_le_and_ne,
      and_congr ((isEquiv_iff_val_le_one _ _).1 h) ((isEquiv_iff_val_eq_one _ _).1 h).not]
  · rw [isEquiv_iff_val_eq_one]
    intro h x
    by_cases hx : x = 0
    · -- porting note: this proof was `simp only [(zero_iff _).2 hx, zero_ne_one]`
      rw [(zero_iff _).2 hx, (zero_iff _).2 hx]
      simp only [zero_ne_one]
    constructor
    · intro hh
      by_contra h_1
      

Proof state:
case neg.mp
K : Type u_1
F : Type u_2
R : Type u_3
inst✝³ : DivisionRing K
Γ₀ : Type u_4
Γ'₀ : Type u_5
Γ''₀ : Type u_6
inst✝² : LinearOrderedCommMonoidWithZero Γ''₀
inst✝¹ : LinearOrderedCommGroupWithZero Γ₀
inst✝ : LinearOrderedCommGroupWithZero Γ'₀
v : Valuation K Γ₀
v' : Valuation K Γ'₀
h : ∀ {x : K}, v x < 1 ↔ v' x < 1
x : K
hx : ¬x = 0
hh : v x = 1
h_1 : ¬v' x = 1
⊢ False

Next tactic:
cases ne_iff_lt_or_gt.1 h_1 with
      | inl h_2 => simpa [hh, lt_self_iff_false] using h.2 h_2
      | inr h_2 =>
          rw [← inv_one, ← inv_eq_iff_eq_inv, ← map_inv₀] at hh
          exact hh.not_lt (h.2 ((one_lt_val_iff v' hx).1 h_2))
theorem isEquiv_iff_val_lt_one [LinearOrderedCommGroupWithZero Γ₀]
    [LinearOrderedCommGroupWithZero Γ'₀] (v : Valuation K Γ₀) (v' : Valuation K Γ'₀) :
    v.IsEquiv v' ↔ ∀ {x : K}, v x < 1 ↔ v' x < 1 := by
  constructor
  · intro h x
    simp only [lt_iff_le_and_ne,
      and_congr ((isEquiv_iff_val_le_one _ _).1 h) ((isEquiv_iff_val_eq_one _ _).1 h).not]
  · rw [isEquiv_iff_val_eq_one]
    intro h x
    by_cases hx : x = 0
    · -- porting note: this proof was `simp only [(zero_iff _).2 hx, zero_ne_one]`
      rw [(zero_iff _).2 hx, (zero_iff _).2 hx]
      simp only [zero_ne_one]
    constructor
    · intro hh
      by_contra h_1
      

Proof state:
case neg.mp
K : Type u_1
F : Type u_2
R : Type u_3
inst✝³ : DivisionRing K
Γ₀ : Type u_4
Γ'₀ : Type u_5
Γ''₀ : Type u_6
inst✝² : LinearOrderedCommMonoidWithZero Γ''₀
inst✝¹ : LinearOrderedCommGroupWithZero Γ₀
inst✝ : LinearOrderedCommGroupWithZero Γ'₀
v : Valuation K Γ₀
v' : Valuation K Γ'₀
h : ∀ {x : K}, v x < 1 ↔ v' x < 1
x : K
hx : ¬x = 0
hh : v x = 1
h_1 : ¬v' x = 1
x✝ : v' x < 1 ∨ v' x > 1
⊢ False

Next tactic:
cases ne_iff_lt_or_gt.1 h_1 with
      | inl h_2 => simpa [hh, lt_self_iff_false] using h.2 h_2
      | inr h_2 =>
          rw [← inv_one, ← inv_eq_iff_eq_inv, ← map_inv₀] at hh
          exact hh.not_lt (h.2 ((one_lt_val_iff v' hx).1 h_2))