l3lab/ntp-mathlib huggingface dataset:
/-- The measurable Besicovitch covering theorem. Assume that, for any `x` in a set `s`,
one is given a set of admissible closed balls centered at `x`, with arbitrarily small radii.
Then there exists a disjoint covering of almost all `s` by admissible closed balls centered at some
points of `s`. We can even require that the radius at `x` is bounded by a given function `R x`.
(Take `R = 1` if you don't need this additional feature).
This version requires that the underlying measure is sigma-finite, and that the space has the
Besicovitch covering property (which is satisfied for instance by normed real vector spaces).
-/
theorem exists_disjoint_closedBall_covering_ae (μ : Measure α) [SigmaFinite μ] (f : α → Set ℝ)
    (s : Set α) (hf : ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ δ > 0, (f x ∩ Ioo 0 δ).Nonempty) (R : α → ℝ)
    (hR : ∀ x ∈ s, 0 < R x) :
    ∃ (t : Set α) (r : α → ℝ), t.Countable ∧ t ⊆ s ∧
      (∀ x ∈ t, r x ∈ f x ∩ Ioo 0 (R x)) ∧ μ (s \ ⋃ x ∈ t, closedBall x (r x)) = 0 ∧
        t.PairwiseDisjoint fun x => closedBall x (r x) := by
  

Proof state:
α : Type u_1
inst✝⁵ : MetricSpace α
β : Type u
inst✝⁴ : SecondCountableTopology α
inst✝³ : MeasurableSpace α
inst✝² : OpensMeasurableSpace α
inst✝¹ : HasBesicovitchCovering α
μ : Measure α
inst✝ : SigmaFinite μ
f : α → Set ℝ
s : Set α
hf : ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ δ > 0, Set.Nonempty (f x ∩ Ioo 0 δ)
R : α → ℝ
hR : ∀ x ∈ s, 0 < R x
⊢ ∃ t r,
    Set.Countable t ∧
      t ⊆ s ∧
        (∀ x ∈ t, r x ∈ f x ∩ Ioo 0 (R x)) ∧
          ↑↑μ (s \ ⋃ x ∈ t, closedBall x (r x)) = 0 ∧ PairwiseDisjoint t fun x => closedBall x (r x)

Next tactic:
let g x := f x ∩ Ioo 0 (R x)
/-- The measurable Besicovitch covering theorem. Assume that, for any `x` in a set `s`,
one is given a set of admissible closed balls centered at `x`, with arbitrarily small radii.
Then there exists a disjoint covering of almost all `s` by admissible closed balls centered at some
points of `s`. We can even require that the radius at `x` is bounded by a given function `R x`.
(Take `R = 1` if you don't need this additional feature).
This version requires that the underlying measure is sigma-finite, and that the space has the
Besicovitch covering property (which is satisfied for instance by normed real vector spaces).
-/
theorem exists_disjoint_closedBall_covering_ae (μ : Measure α) [SigmaFinite μ] (f : α → Set ℝ)
    (s : Set α) (hf : ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ δ > 0, (f x ∩ Ioo 0 δ).Nonempty) (R : α → ℝ)
    (hR : ∀ x ∈ s, 0 < R x) :
    ∃ (t : Set α) (r : α → ℝ), t.Countable ∧ t ⊆ s ∧
      (∀ x ∈ t, r x ∈ f x ∩ Ioo 0 (R x)) ∧ μ (s \ ⋃ x ∈ t, closedBall x (r x)) = 0 ∧
        t.PairwiseDisjoint fun x => closedBall x (r x) := by
  let g x := f x ∩ Ioo 0 (R x)
  

Proof state:
α : Type u_1
inst✝⁵ : MetricSpace α
β : Type u
inst✝⁴ : SecondCountableTopology α
inst✝³ : MeasurableSpace α
inst✝² : OpensMeasurableSpace α
inst✝¹ : HasBesicovitchCovering α
μ : Measure α
inst✝ : SigmaFinite μ
f : α → Set ℝ
s : Set α
hf : ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ δ > 0, Set.Nonempty (f x ∩ Ioo 0 δ)
R : α → ℝ
hR : ∀ x ∈ s, 0 < R x
g : α → Set ℝ := fun x => f x ∩ Ioo 0 (R x)
⊢ ∃ t r,
    Set.Countable t ∧
      t ⊆ s ∧
        (∀ x ∈ t, r x ∈ f x ∩ Ioo 0 (R x)) ∧
          ↑↑μ (s \ ⋃ x ∈ t, closedBall x (r x)) = 0 ∧ PairwiseDisjoint t fun x => closedBall x (r x)

Next tactic:
have hg : ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ δ > 0, (g x ∩ Ioo 0 δ).Nonempty := by
    intro x hx δ δpos
    rcases hf x hx (min δ (R x)) (lt_min δpos (hR x hx)) with ⟨r, hr⟩
    exact
      ⟨r,
        ⟨⟨hr.1, hr.2.1, hr.2.2.trans_le (min_le_right _ _)⟩,
          ⟨hr.2.1, hr.2.2.trans_le (min_le_left _ _)⟩⟩⟩
/-- The measurable Besicovitch covering theorem. Assume that, for any `x` in a set `s`,
one is given a set of admissible closed balls centered at `x`, with arbitrarily small radii.
Then there exists a disjoint covering of almost all `s` by admissible closed balls centered at some
points of `s`. We can even require that the radius at `x` is bounded by a given function `R x`.
(Take `R = 1` if you don't need this additional feature).
This version requires that the underlying measure is sigma-finite, and that the space has the
Besicovitch covering property (which is satisfied for instance by normed real vector spaces).
-/
theorem exists_disjoint_closedBall_covering_ae (μ : Measure α) [SigmaFinite μ] (f : α → Set ℝ)
    (s : Set α) (hf : ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ δ > 0, (f x ∩ Ioo 0 δ).Nonempty) (R : α → ℝ)
    (hR : ∀ x ∈ s, 0 < R x) :
    ∃ (t : Set α) (r : α → ℝ), t.Countable ∧ t ⊆ s ∧
      (∀ x ∈ t, r x ∈ f x ∩ Ioo 0 (R x)) ∧ μ (s \ ⋃ x ∈ t, closedBall x (r x)) = 0 ∧
        t.PairwiseDisjoint fun x => closedBall x (r x) := by
  let g x := f x ∩ Ioo 0 (R x)
  have hg : ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ δ > 0, (g x ∩ Ioo 0 δ).Nonempty := by
    

Proof state:
α : Type u_1
inst✝⁵ : MetricSpace α
β : Type u
inst✝⁴ : SecondCountableTopology α
inst✝³ : MeasurableSpace α
inst✝² : OpensMeasurableSpace α
inst✝¹ : HasBesicovitchCovering α
μ : Measure α
inst✝ : SigmaFinite μ
f : α → Set ℝ
s : Set α
hf : ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ δ > 0, Set.Nonempty (f x ∩ Ioo 0 δ)
R : α → ℝ
hR : ∀ x ∈ s, 0 < R x
g : α → Set ℝ := fun x => f x ∩ Ioo 0 (R x)
⊢ ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ δ > 0, Set.Nonempty (g x ∩ Ioo 0 δ)

Next tactic:
intro x hx δ δpos
/-- The measurable Besicovitch covering theorem. Assume that, for any `x` in a set `s`,
one is given a set of admissible closed balls centered at `x`, with arbitrarily small radii.
Then there exists a disjoint covering of almost all `s` by admissible closed balls centered at some
points of `s`. We can even require that the radius at `x` is bounded by a given function `R x`.
(Take `R = 1` if you don't need this additional feature).
This version requires that the underlying measure is sigma-finite, and that the space has the
Besicovitch covering property (which is satisfied for instance by normed real vector spaces).
-/
theorem exists_disjoint_closedBall_covering_ae (μ : Measure α) [SigmaFinite μ] (f : α → Set ℝ)
    (s : Set α) (hf : ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ δ > 0, (f x ∩ Ioo 0 δ).Nonempty) (R : α → ℝ)
    (hR : ∀ x ∈ s, 0 < R x) :
    ∃ (t : Set α) (r : α → ℝ), t.Countable ∧ t ⊆ s ∧
      (∀ x ∈ t, r x ∈ f x ∩ Ioo 0 (R x)) ∧ μ (s \ ⋃ x ∈ t, closedBall x (r x)) = 0 ∧
        t.PairwiseDisjoint fun x => closedBall x (r x) := by
  let g x := f x ∩ Ioo 0 (R x)
  have hg : ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ δ > 0, (g x ∩ Ioo 0 δ).Nonempty := by
    intro x hx δ δpos
    

Proof state:
α : Type u_1
inst✝⁵ : MetricSpace α
β : Type u
inst✝⁴ : SecondCountableTopology α
inst✝³ : MeasurableSpace α
inst✝² : OpensMeasurableSpace α
inst✝¹ : HasBesicovitchCovering α
μ : Measure α
inst✝ : SigmaFinite μ
f : α → Set ℝ
s : Set α
hf : ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ δ > 0, Set.Nonempty (f x ∩ Ioo 0 δ)
R : α → ℝ
hR : ∀ x ∈ s, 0 < R x
g : α → Set ℝ := fun x => f x ∩ Ioo 0 (R x)
x : α
hx : x ∈ s
δ : ℝ
δpos : δ > 0
⊢ Set.Nonempty (g x ∩ Ioo 0 δ)

Next tactic:
rcases hf x hx (min δ (R x)) (lt_min δpos (hR x hx)) with ⟨r, hr⟩
/-- The measurable Besicovitch covering theorem. Assume that, for any `x` in a set `s`,
one is given a set of admissible closed balls centered at `x`, with arbitrarily small radii.
Then there exists a disjoint covering of almost all `s` by admissible closed balls centered at some
points of `s`. We can even require that the radius at `x` is bounded by a given function `R x`.
(Take `R = 1` if you don't need this additional feature).
This version requires that the underlying measure is sigma-finite, and that the space has the
Besicovitch covering property (which is satisfied for instance by normed real vector spaces).
-/
theorem exists_disjoint_closedBall_covering_ae (μ : Measure α) [SigmaFinite μ] (f : α → Set ℝ)
    (s : Set α) (hf : ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ δ > 0, (f x ∩ Ioo 0 δ).Nonempty) (R : α → ℝ)
    (hR : ∀ x ∈ s, 0 < R x) :
    ∃ (t : Set α) (r : α → ℝ), t.Countable ∧ t ⊆ s ∧
      (∀ x ∈ t, r x ∈ f x ∩ Ioo 0 (R x)) ∧ μ (s \ ⋃ x ∈ t, closedBall x (r x)) = 0 ∧
        t.PairwiseDisjoint fun x => closedBall x (r x) := by
  let g x := f x ∩ Ioo 0 (R x)
  have hg : ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ δ > 0, (g x ∩ Ioo 0 δ).Nonempty := by
    intro x hx δ δpos
    rcases hf x hx (min δ (R x)) (lt_min δpos (hR x hx)) with ⟨r, hr⟩
    

Proof state:
case intro
α : Type u_1
inst✝⁵ : MetricSpace α
β : Type u
inst✝⁴ : SecondCountableTopology α
inst✝³ : MeasurableSpace α
inst✝² : OpensMeasurableSpace α
inst✝¹ : HasBesicovitchCovering α
μ : Measure α
inst✝ : SigmaFinite μ
f : α → Set ℝ
s : Set α
hf : ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ δ > 0, Set.Nonempty (f x ∩ Ioo 0 δ)
R : α → ℝ
hR : ∀ x ∈ s, 0 < R x
g : α → Set ℝ := fun x => f x ∩ Ioo 0 (R x)
x : α
hx : x ∈ s
δ : ℝ
δpos : δ > 0
r : ℝ
hr : r ∈ f x ∩ Ioo 0 (min δ (R x))
⊢ Set.Nonempty (g x ∩ Ioo 0 δ)

Next tactic:
exact
      ⟨r,
        ⟨⟨hr.1, hr.2.1, hr.2.2.trans_le (min_le_right _ _)⟩,
          ⟨hr.2.1, hr.2.2.trans_le (min_le_left _ _)⟩⟩⟩
/-- The measurable Besicovitch covering theorem. Assume that, for any `x` in a set `s`,
one is given a set of admissible closed balls centered at `x`, with arbitrarily small radii.
Then there exists a disjoint covering of almost all `s` by admissible closed balls centered at some
points of `s`. We can even require that the radius at `x` is bounded by a given function `R x`.
(Take `R = 1` if you don't need this additional feature).
This version requires that the underlying measure is sigma-finite, and that the space has the
Besicovitch covering property (which is satisfied for instance by normed real vector spaces).
-/
theorem exists_disjoint_closedBall_covering_ae (μ : Measure α) [SigmaFinite μ] (f : α → Set ℝ)
    (s : Set α) (hf : ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ δ > 0, (f x ∩ Ioo 0 δ).Nonempty) (R : α → ℝ)
    (hR : ∀ x ∈ s, 0 < R x) :
    ∃ (t : Set α) (r : α → ℝ), t.Countable ∧ t ⊆ s ∧
      (∀ x ∈ t, r x ∈ f x ∩ Ioo 0 (R x)) ∧ μ (s \ ⋃ x ∈ t, closedBall x (r x)) = 0 ∧
        t.PairwiseDisjoint fun x => closedBall x (r x) := by
  let g x := f x ∩ Ioo 0 (R x)
  have hg : ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ δ > 0, (g x ∩ Ioo 0 δ).Nonempty := by
    intro x hx δ δpos
    rcases hf x hx (min δ (R x)) (lt_min δpos (hR x hx)) with ⟨r, hr⟩
    exact
      ⟨r,
        ⟨⟨hr.1, hr.2.1, hr.2.2.trans_le (min_le_right _ _)⟩,
          ⟨hr.2.1, hr.2.2.trans_le (min_le_left _ _)⟩⟩⟩
  

Proof state:
α : Type u_1
inst✝⁵ : MetricSpace α
β : Type u
inst✝⁴ : SecondCountableTopology α
inst✝³ : MeasurableSpace α
inst✝² : OpensMeasurableSpace α
inst✝¹ : HasBesicovitchCovering α
μ : Measure α
inst✝ : SigmaFinite μ
f : α → Set ℝ
s : Set α
hf : ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ δ > 0, Set.Nonempty (f x ∩ Ioo 0 δ)
R : α → ℝ
hR : ∀ x ∈ s, 0 < R x
g : α → Set ℝ := fun x => f x ∩ Ioo 0 (R x)
hg : ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ δ > 0, Set.Nonempty (g x ∩ Ioo 0 δ)
⊢ ∃ t r,
    Set.Countable t ∧
      t ⊆ s ∧
        (∀ x ∈ t, r x ∈ f x ∩ Ioo 0 (R x)) ∧
          ↑↑μ (s \ ⋃ x ∈ t, closedBall x (r x)) = 0 ∧ PairwiseDisjoint t fun x => closedBall x (r x)

Next tactic:
rcases exists_disjoint_closedBall_covering_ae_aux μ g s hg with ⟨v, v_count, vs, vg, μv, v_disj⟩
/-- The measurable Besicovitch covering theorem. Assume that, for any `x` in a set `s`,
one is given a set of admissible closed balls centered at `x`, with arbitrarily small radii.
Then there exists a disjoint covering of almost all `s` by admissible closed balls centered at some
points of `s`. We can even require that the radius at `x` is bounded by a given function `R x`.
(Take `R = 1` if you don't need this additional feature).
This version requires that the underlying measure is sigma-finite, and that the space has the
Besicovitch covering property (which is satisfied for instance by normed real vector spaces).
-/
theorem exists_disjoint_closedBall_covering_ae (μ : Measure α) [SigmaFinite μ] (f : α → Set ℝ)
    (s : Set α) (hf : ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ δ > 0, (f x ∩ Ioo 0 δ).Nonempty) (R : α → ℝ)
    (hR : ∀ x ∈ s, 0 < R x) :
    ∃ (t : Set α) (r : α → ℝ), t.Countable ∧ t ⊆ s ∧
      (∀ x ∈ t, r x ∈ f x ∩ Ioo 0 (R x)) ∧ μ (s \ ⋃ x ∈ t, closedBall x (r x)) = 0 ∧
        t.PairwiseDisjoint fun x => closedBall x (r x) := by
  let g x := f x ∩ Ioo 0 (R x)
  have hg : ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ δ > 0, (g x ∩ Ioo 0 δ).Nonempty := by
    intro x hx δ δpos
    rcases hf x hx (min δ (R x)) (lt_min δpos (hR x hx)) with ⟨r, hr⟩
    exact
      ⟨r,
        ⟨⟨hr.1, hr.2.1, hr.2.2.trans_le (min_le_right _ _)⟩,
          ⟨hr.2.1, hr.2.2.trans_le (min_le_left _ _)⟩⟩⟩
  rcases exists_disjoint_closedBall_covering_ae_aux μ g s hg with ⟨v, v_count, vs, vg, μv, v_disj⟩
  

Proof state:
case intro.intro.intro.intro.intro
α : Type u_1
inst✝⁵ : MetricSpace α
β : Type u
inst✝⁴ : SecondCountableTopology α
inst✝³ : MeasurableSpace α
inst✝² : OpensMeasurableSpace α
inst✝¹ : HasBesicovitchCovering α
μ : Measure α
inst✝ : SigmaFinite μ
f : α → Set ℝ
s : Set α
hf : ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ δ > 0, Set.Nonempty (f x ∩ Ioo 0 δ)
R : α → ℝ
hR : ∀ x ∈ s, 0 < R x
g : α → Set ℝ := fun x => f x ∩ Ioo 0 (R x)
hg : ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ δ > 0, Set.Nonempty (g x ∩ Ioo 0 δ)
v : Set (α × ℝ)
v_count : Set.Countable v
vs : ∀ p ∈ v, p.1 ∈ s
vg : ∀ p ∈ v, p.2 ∈ g p.1
μv : ↑↑μ (s \ ⋃ p ∈ v, closedBall p.1 p.2) = 0
v_disj : PairwiseDisjoint v fun p => closedBall p.1 p.2
⊢ ∃ t r,
    Set.Countable t ∧
      t ⊆ s ∧
        (∀ x ∈ t, r x ∈ f x ∩ Ioo 0 (R x)) ∧
          ↑↑μ (s \ ⋃ x ∈ t, closedBall x (r x)) = 0 ∧ PairwiseDisjoint t fun x => closedBall x (r x)

Next tactic:
let t := Prod.fst '' v
/-- The measurable Besicovitch covering theorem. Assume that, for any `x` in a set `s`,
one is given a set of admissible closed balls centered at `x`, with arbitrarily small radii.
Then there exists a disjoint covering of almost all `s` by admissible closed balls centered at some
points of `s`. We can even require that the radius at `x` is bounded by a given function `R x`.
(Take `R = 1` if you don't need this additional feature).
This version requires that the underlying measure is sigma-finite, and that the space has the
Besicovitch covering property (which is satisfied for instance by normed real vector spaces).
-/
theorem exists_disjoint_closedBall_covering_ae (μ : Measure α) [SigmaFinite μ] (f : α → Set ℝ)
    (s : Set α) (hf : ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ δ > 0, (f x ∩ Ioo 0 δ).Nonempty) (R : α → ℝ)
    (hR : ∀ x ∈ s, 0 < R x) :
    ∃ (t : Set α) (r : α → ℝ), t.Countable ∧ t ⊆ s ∧
      (∀ x ∈ t, r x ∈ f x ∩ Ioo 0 (R x)) ∧ μ (s \ ⋃ x ∈ t, closedBall x (r x)) = 0 ∧
        t.PairwiseDisjoint fun x => closedBall x (r x) := by
  let g x := f x ∩ Ioo 0 (R x)
  have hg : ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ δ > 0, (g x ∩ Ioo 0 δ).Nonempty := by
    intro x hx δ δpos
    rcases hf x hx (min δ (R x)) (lt_min δpos (hR x hx)) with ⟨r, hr⟩
    exact
      ⟨r,
        ⟨⟨hr.1, hr.2.1, hr.2.2.trans_le (min_le_right _ _)⟩,
          ⟨hr.2.1, hr.2.2.trans_le (min_le_left _ _)⟩⟩⟩
  rcases exists_disjoint_closedBall_covering_ae_aux μ g s hg with ⟨v, v_count, vs, vg, μv, v_disj⟩
  let t := Prod.fst '' v
  

Proof state:
case intro.intro.intro.intro.intro
α : Type u_1
inst✝⁵ : MetricSpace α
β : Type u
inst✝⁴ : SecondCountableTopology α
inst✝³ : MeasurableSpace α
inst✝² : OpensMeasurableSpace α
inst✝¹ : HasBesicovitchCovering α
μ : Measure α
inst✝ : SigmaFinite μ
f : α → Set ℝ
s : Set α
hf : ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ δ > 0, Set.Nonempty (f x ∩ Ioo 0 δ)
R : α → ℝ
hR : ∀ x ∈ s, 0 < R x
g : α → Set ℝ := fun x => f x ∩ Ioo 0 (R x)
hg : ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ δ > 0, Set.Nonempty (g x ∩ Ioo 0 δ)
v : Set (α × ℝ)
v_count : Set.Countable v
vs : ∀ p ∈ v, p.1 ∈ s
vg : ∀ p ∈ v, p.2 ∈ g p.1
μv : ↑↑μ (s \ ⋃ p ∈ v, closedBall p.1 p.2) = 0
v_disj : PairwiseDisjoint v fun p => closedBall p.1 p.2
t : Set α := Prod.fst '' v
⊢ ∃ t r,
    Set.Countable t ∧
      t ⊆ s ∧
        (∀ x ∈ t, r x ∈ f x ∩ Ioo 0 (R x)) ∧
          ↑↑μ (s \ ⋃ x ∈ t, closedBall x (r x)) = 0 ∧ PairwiseDisjoint t fun x => closedBall x (r x)

Next tactic:
have : ∀ x ∈ t, ∃ r : ℝ, (x, r) ∈ v := by
    intro x hx
    rcases (mem_image _ _ _).1 hx with ⟨⟨p, q⟩, hp, rfl⟩
    exact ⟨q, hp⟩
/-- The measurable Besicovitch covering theorem. Assume that, for any `x` in a set `s`,
one is given a set of admissible closed balls centered at `x`, with arbitrarily small radii.
Then there exists a disjoint covering of almost all `s` by admissible closed balls centered at some
points of `s`. We can even require that the radius at `x` is bounded by a given function `R x`.
(Take `R = 1` if you don't need this additional feature).
This version requires that the underlying measure is sigma-finite, and that the space has the
Besicovitch covering property (which is satisfied for instance by normed real vector spaces).
-/
theorem exists_disjoint_closedBall_covering_ae (μ : Measure α) [SigmaFinite μ] (f : α → Set ℝ)
    (s : Set α) (hf : ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ δ > 0, (f x ∩ Ioo 0 δ).Nonempty) (R : α → ℝ)
    (hR : ∀ x ∈ s, 0 < R x) :
    ∃ (t : Set α) (r : α → ℝ), t.Countable ∧ t ⊆ s ∧
      (∀ x ∈ t, r x ∈ f x ∩ Ioo 0 (R x)) ∧ μ (s \ ⋃ x ∈ t, closedBall x (r x)) = 0 ∧
        t.PairwiseDisjoint fun x => closedBall x (r x) := by
  let g x := f x ∩ Ioo 0 (R x)
  have hg : ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ δ > 0, (g x ∩ Ioo 0 δ).Nonempty := by
    intro x hx δ δpos
    rcases hf x hx (min δ (R x)) (lt_min δpos (hR x hx)) with ⟨r, hr⟩
    exact
      ⟨r,
        ⟨⟨hr.1, hr.2.1, hr.2.2.trans_le (min_le_right _ _)⟩,
          ⟨hr.2.1, hr.2.2.trans_le (min_le_left _ _)⟩⟩⟩
  rcases exists_disjoint_closedBall_covering_ae_aux μ g s hg with ⟨v, v_count, vs, vg, μv, v_disj⟩
  let t := Prod.fst '' v
  have : ∀ x ∈ t, ∃ r : ℝ, (x, r) ∈ v := by
    

Proof state:
α : Type u_1
inst✝⁵ : MetricSpace α
β : Type u
inst✝⁴ : SecondCountableTopology α
inst✝³ : MeasurableSpace α
inst✝² : OpensMeasurableSpace α
inst✝¹ : HasBesicovitchCovering α
μ : Measure α
inst✝ : SigmaFinite μ
f : α → Set ℝ
s : Set α
hf : ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ δ > 0, Set.Nonempty (f x ∩ Ioo 0 δ)
R : α → ℝ
hR : ∀ x ∈ s, 0 < R x
g : α → Set ℝ := fun x => f x ∩ Ioo 0 (R x)
hg : ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ δ > 0, Set.Nonempty (g x ∩ Ioo 0 δ)
v : Set (α × ℝ)
v_count : Set.Countable v
vs : ∀ p ∈ v, p.1 ∈ s
vg : ∀ p ∈ v, p.2 ∈ g p.1
μv : ↑↑μ (s \ ⋃ p ∈ v, closedBall p.1 p.2) = 0
v_disj : PairwiseDisjoint v fun p => closedBall p.1 p.2
t : Set α := Prod.fst '' v
⊢ ∀ x ∈ t, ∃ r, (x, r) ∈ v

Next tactic:
intro x hx
/-- The measurable Besicovitch covering theorem. Assume that, for any `x` in a set `s`,
one is given a set of admissible closed balls centered at `x`, with arbitrarily small radii.
Then there exists a disjoint covering of almost all `s` by admissible closed balls centered at some
points of `s`. We can even require that the radius at `x` is bounded by a given function `R x`.
(Take `R = 1` if you don't need this additional feature).
This version requires that the underlying measure is sigma-finite, and that the space has the
Besicovitch covering property (which is satisfied for instance by normed real vector spaces).
-/
theorem exists_disjoint_closedBall_covering_ae (μ : Measure α) [SigmaFinite μ] (f : α → Set ℝ)
    (s : Set α) (hf : ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ δ > 0, (f x ∩ Ioo 0 δ).Nonempty) (R : α → ℝ)
    (hR : ∀ x ∈ s, 0 < R x) :
    ∃ (t : Set α) (r : α → ℝ), t.Countable ∧ t ⊆ s ∧
      (∀ x ∈ t, r x ∈ f x ∩ Ioo 0 (R x)) ∧ μ (s \ ⋃ x ∈ t, closedBall x (r x)) = 0 ∧
        t.PairwiseDisjoint fun x => closedBall x (r x) := by
  let g x := f x ∩ Ioo 0 (R x)
  have hg : ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ δ > 0, (g x ∩ Ioo 0 δ).Nonempty := by
    intro x hx δ δpos
    rcases hf x hx (min δ (R x)) (lt_min δpos (hR x hx)) with ⟨r, hr⟩
    exact
      ⟨r,
        ⟨⟨hr.1, hr.2.1, hr.2.2.trans_le (min_le_right _ _)⟩,
          ⟨hr.2.1, hr.2.2.trans_le (min_le_left _ _)⟩⟩⟩
  rcases exists_disjoint_closedBall_covering_ae_aux μ g s hg with ⟨v, v_count, vs, vg, μv, v_disj⟩
  let t := Prod.fst '' v
  have : ∀ x ∈ t, ∃ r : ℝ, (x, r) ∈ v := by
    intro x hx
    

Proof state:
α : Type u_1
inst✝⁵ : MetricSpace α
β : Type u
inst✝⁴ : SecondCountableTopology α
inst✝³ : MeasurableSpace α
inst✝² : OpensMeasurableSpace α
inst✝¹ : HasBesicovitchCovering α
μ : Measure α
inst✝ : SigmaFinite μ
f : α → Set ℝ
s : Set α
hf : ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ δ > 0, Set.Nonempty (f x ∩ Ioo 0 δ)
R : α → ℝ
hR : ∀ x ∈ s, 0 < R x
g : α → Set ℝ := fun x => f x ∩ Ioo 0 (R x)
hg : ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ δ > 0, Set.Nonempty (g x ∩ Ioo 0 δ)
v : Set (α × ℝ)
v_count : Set.Countable v
vs : ∀ p ∈ v, p.1 ∈ s
vg : ∀ p ∈ v, p.2 ∈ g p.1
μv : ↑↑μ (s \ ⋃ p ∈ v, closedBall p.1 p.2) = 0
v_disj : PairwiseDisjoint v fun p => closedBall p.1 p.2
t : Set α := Prod.fst '' v
x : α
hx : x ∈ t
⊢ ∃ r, (x, r) ∈ v

Next tactic:
rcases (mem_image _ _ _).1 hx with ⟨⟨p, q⟩, hp, rfl⟩
/-- The measurable Besicovitch covering theorem. Assume that, for any `x` in a set `s`,
one is given a set of admissible closed balls centered at `x`, with arbitrarily small radii.
Then there exists a disjoint covering of almost all `s` by admissible closed balls centered at some
points of `s`. We can even require that the radius at `x` is bounded by a given function `R x`.
(Take `R = 1` if you don't need this additional feature).
This version requires that the underlying measure is sigma-finite, and that the space has the
Besicovitch covering property (which is satisfied for instance by normed real vector spaces).
-/
theorem exists_disjoint_closedBall_covering_ae (μ : Measure α) [SigmaFinite μ] (f : α → Set ℝ)
    (s : Set α) (hf : ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ δ > 0, (f x ∩ Ioo 0 δ).Nonempty) (R : α → ℝ)
    (hR : ∀ x ∈ s, 0 < R x) :
    ∃ (t : Set α) (r : α → ℝ), t.Countable ∧ t ⊆ s ∧
      (∀ x ∈ t, r x ∈ f x ∩ Ioo 0 (R x)) ∧ μ (s \ ⋃ x ∈ t, closedBall x (r x)) = 0 ∧
        t.PairwiseDisjoint fun x => closedBall x (r x) := by
  let g x := f x ∩ Ioo 0 (R x)
  have hg : ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ δ > 0, (g x ∩ Ioo 0 δ).Nonempty := by
    intro x hx δ δpos
    rcases hf x hx (min δ (R x)) (lt_min δpos (hR x hx)) with ⟨r, hr⟩
    exact
      ⟨r,
        ⟨⟨hr.1, hr.2.1, hr.2.2.trans_le (min_le_right _ _)⟩,
          ⟨hr.2.1, hr.2.2.trans_le (min_le_left _ _)⟩⟩⟩
  rcases exists_disjoint_closedBall_covering_ae_aux μ g s hg with ⟨v, v_count, vs, vg, μv, v_disj⟩
  let t := Prod.fst '' v
  have : ∀ x ∈ t, ∃ r : ℝ, (x, r) ∈ v := by
    intro x hx
    rcases (mem_image _ _ _).1 hx with ⟨⟨p, q⟩, hp, rfl⟩
    

Proof state:
case intro.mk.intro
α : Type u_1
inst✝⁵ : MetricSpace α
β : Type u
inst✝⁴ : SecondCountableTopology α
inst✝³ : MeasurableSpace α
inst✝² : OpensMeasurableSpace α
inst✝¹ : HasBesicovitchCovering α
μ : Measure α
inst✝ : SigmaFinite μ
f : α → Set ℝ
s : Set α
hf : ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ δ > 0, Set.Nonempty (f x ∩ Ioo 0 δ)
R : α → ℝ
hR : ∀ x ∈ s, 0 < R x
g : α → Set ℝ := fun x => f x ∩ Ioo 0 (R x)
hg : ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ δ > 0, Set.Nonempty (g x ∩ Ioo 0 δ)
v : Set (α × ℝ)
v_count : Set.Countable v
vs : ∀ p ∈ v, p.1 ∈ s
vg : ∀ p ∈ v, p.2 ∈ g p.1
μv : ↑↑μ (s \ ⋃ p ∈ v, closedBall p.1 p.2) = 0
v_disj : PairwiseDisjoint v fun p => closedBall p.1 p.2
t : Set α := Prod.fst '' v
p : α
q : ℝ
hp : (p, q) ∈ v
hx : (p, q).1 ∈ t
⊢ ∃ r, ((p, q).1, r) ∈ v

Next tactic:
exact ⟨q, hp⟩