l3lab/ntp-mathlib huggingface dataset:
theorem eq_pell_lem : ∀ (n) (b : ℤ√(d a1)), 1 ≤ b → IsPell b →
    b ≤ pellZd a1 n → ∃ n, b = pellZd a1 n
  | 0, b => fun h1 _ hl => ⟨0, @Zsqrtd.le_antisymm _ (dnsq a1) _ _ hl h1⟩
  | n + 1, b => fun h1 hp h =>
    have a1p : (0 : ℤ√(d a1)) ≤ ⟨a, 1⟩ := trivial
    have am1p : (0 : ℤ√(d a1)) ≤ ⟨a, -1⟩ := show (_ : Nat) ≤ _ by simp; exact Nat.pred_le _
    have a1m : (⟨a, 1⟩ * ⟨a, -1⟩ : ℤ√(d a1)) = 1 := isPell_norm.1 (isPell_one a1)
    if ha : (⟨↑a, 1⟩ : ℤ√(d a1)) ≤ b then
      let ⟨m, e⟩ :=
        eq_pell_lem n (b * ⟨a, -1⟩) (by rw [← a1m]; exact mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right ha am1p)
          (isPell_mul hp (isPell_star.1 (isPell_one a1)))
          (by
            have t := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right h am1p
            rwa [pellZd_succ, mul_assoc, a1m, mul_one] at t)
      ⟨m + 1, by
        rw [show b = b * ⟨a, -1⟩ * ⟨a, 1⟩ by rw [mul_assoc, Eq.trans (mul_comm _ _) a1m]; simp,
          pellZd_succ, e]⟩
    else
      suffices ¬1 < b from ⟨0, show b = 1 from (Or.resolve_left (lt_or_eq_of_le h1) this).symm⟩
      fun h1l => by
      cases' b with x y
      exact by
        

Proof state:
a : ℕ
a1 : 1 < a
n : ℕ
a1p : 0 ≤ { re := ↑a, im := 1 }
am1p : 0 ≤ { re := ↑a, im := -1 }
a1m : { re := ↑a, im := 1 } * { re := ↑a, im := -1 } = 1
x y : ℤ
h1 : 1 ≤ { re := x, im := y }
hp : IsPell { re := x, im := y }
h : { re := x, im := y } ≤ pellZd a1 (n + 1)
ha : ¬{ re := ↑a, im := 1 } ≤ { re := x, im := y }
h1l : 1 < { re := x, im := y }
⊢ False

Next tactic:
have bm : (_ * ⟨_, _⟩ : ℤ√d a1) = 1 := Pell.isPell_norm.1 hp
theorem eq_pell_lem : ∀ (n) (b : ℤ√(d a1)), 1 ≤ b → IsPell b →
    b ≤ pellZd a1 n → ∃ n, b = pellZd a1 n
  | 0, b => fun h1 _ hl => ⟨0, @Zsqrtd.le_antisymm _ (dnsq a1) _ _ hl h1⟩
  | n + 1, b => fun h1 hp h =>
    have a1p : (0 : ℤ√(d a1)) ≤ ⟨a, 1⟩ := trivial
    have am1p : (0 : ℤ√(d a1)) ≤ ⟨a, -1⟩ := show (_ : Nat) ≤ _ by simp; exact Nat.pred_le _
    have a1m : (⟨a, 1⟩ * ⟨a, -1⟩ : ℤ√(d a1)) = 1 := isPell_norm.1 (isPell_one a1)
    if ha : (⟨↑a, 1⟩ : ℤ√(d a1)) ≤ b then
      let ⟨m, e⟩ :=
        eq_pell_lem n (b * ⟨a, -1⟩) (by rw [← a1m]; exact mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right ha am1p)
          (isPell_mul hp (isPell_star.1 (isPell_one a1)))
          (by
            have t := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right h am1p
            rwa [pellZd_succ, mul_assoc, a1m, mul_one] at t)
      ⟨m + 1, by
        rw [show b = b * ⟨a, -1⟩ * ⟨a, 1⟩ by rw [mul_assoc, Eq.trans (mul_comm _ _) a1m]; simp,
          pellZd_succ, e]⟩
    else
      suffices ¬1 < b from ⟨0, show b = 1 from (Or.resolve_left (lt_or_eq_of_le h1) this).symm⟩
      fun h1l => by
      cases' b with x y
      exact by
        have bm : (_ * ⟨_, _⟩ : ℤ√d a1) = 1 := Pell.isPell_norm.1 hp
        

Proof state:
a : ℕ
a1 : 1 < a
n : ℕ
a1p : 0 ≤ { re := ↑a, im := 1 }
am1p : 0 ≤ { re := ↑a, im := -1 }
a1m : { re := ↑a, im := 1 } * { re := ↑a, im := -1 } = 1
x y : ℤ
h1 : 1 ≤ { re := x, im := y }
hp : IsPell { re := x, im := y }
h : { re := x, im := y } ≤ pellZd a1 (n + 1)
ha : ¬{ re := ↑a, im := 1 } ≤ { re := x, im := y }
h1l : 1 < { re := x, im := y }
bm : { re := x, im := y } * { re := { re := x, im := y }.re, im := -{ re := x, im := y }.im } = 1
⊢ False

Next tactic:
have y0l : (0 : ℤ√d a1) < ⟨x - x, y - -y⟩ :=
          sub_lt_sub h1l fun hn : (1 : ℤ√d a1) ≤ ⟨x, -y⟩ => by
            have t := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left hn (le_trans zero_le_one h1)
            erw [bm, mul_one] at t
            exact h1l t
theorem eq_pell_lem : ∀ (n) (b : ℤ√(d a1)), 1 ≤ b → IsPell b →
    b ≤ pellZd a1 n → ∃ n, b = pellZd a1 n
  | 0, b => fun h1 _ hl => ⟨0, @Zsqrtd.le_antisymm _ (dnsq a1) _ _ hl h1⟩
  | n + 1, b => fun h1 hp h =>
    have a1p : (0 : ℤ√(d a1)) ≤ ⟨a, 1⟩ := trivial
    have am1p : (0 : ℤ√(d a1)) ≤ ⟨a, -1⟩ := show (_ : Nat) ≤ _ by simp; exact Nat.pred_le _
    have a1m : (⟨a, 1⟩ * ⟨a, -1⟩ : ℤ√(d a1)) = 1 := isPell_norm.1 (isPell_one a1)
    if ha : (⟨↑a, 1⟩ : ℤ√(d a1)) ≤ b then
      let ⟨m, e⟩ :=
        eq_pell_lem n (b * ⟨a, -1⟩) (by rw [← a1m]; exact mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right ha am1p)
          (isPell_mul hp (isPell_star.1 (isPell_one a1)))
          (by
            have t := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right h am1p
            rwa [pellZd_succ, mul_assoc, a1m, mul_one] at t)
      ⟨m + 1, by
        rw [show b = b * ⟨a, -1⟩ * ⟨a, 1⟩ by rw [mul_assoc, Eq.trans (mul_comm _ _) a1m]; simp,
          pellZd_succ, e]⟩
    else
      suffices ¬1 < b from ⟨0, show b = 1 from (Or.resolve_left (lt_or_eq_of_le h1) this).symm⟩
      fun h1l => by
      cases' b with x y
      exact by
        have bm : (_ * ⟨_, _⟩ : ℤ√d a1) = 1 := Pell.isPell_norm.1 hp
        have y0l : (0 : ℤ√d a1) < ⟨x - x, y - -y⟩ :=
          sub_lt_sub h1l fun hn : (1 : ℤ√d a1) ≤ ⟨x, -y⟩ => by
            

Proof state:
a : ℕ
a1 : 1 < a
n : ℕ
a1p : 0 ≤ { re := ↑a, im := 1 }
am1p : 0 ≤ { re := ↑a, im := -1 }
a1m : { re := ↑a, im := 1 } * { re := ↑a, im := -1 } = 1
x y : ℤ
h1 : 1 ≤ { re := x, im := y }
hp : IsPell { re := x, im := y }
h : { re := x, im := y } ≤ pellZd a1 (n + 1)
ha : ¬{ re := ↑a, im := 1 } ≤ { re := x, im := y }
h1l : 1 < { re := x, im := y }
bm : { re := x, im := y } * { re := { re := x, im := y }.re, im := -{ re := x, im := y }.im } = 1
hn : 1 ≤ { re := x, im := -y }
⊢ False

Next tactic:
have t := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left hn (le_trans zero_le_one h1)
theorem eq_pell_lem : ∀ (n) (b : ℤ√(d a1)), 1 ≤ b → IsPell b →
    b ≤ pellZd a1 n → ∃ n, b = pellZd a1 n
  | 0, b => fun h1 _ hl => ⟨0, @Zsqrtd.le_antisymm _ (dnsq a1) _ _ hl h1⟩
  | n + 1, b => fun h1 hp h =>
    have a1p : (0 : ℤ√(d a1)) ≤ ⟨a, 1⟩ := trivial
    have am1p : (0 : ℤ√(d a1)) ≤ ⟨a, -1⟩ := show (_ : Nat) ≤ _ by simp; exact Nat.pred_le _
    have a1m : (⟨a, 1⟩ * ⟨a, -1⟩ : ℤ√(d a1)) = 1 := isPell_norm.1 (isPell_one a1)
    if ha : (⟨↑a, 1⟩ : ℤ√(d a1)) ≤ b then
      let ⟨m, e⟩ :=
        eq_pell_lem n (b * ⟨a, -1⟩) (by rw [← a1m]; exact mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right ha am1p)
          (isPell_mul hp (isPell_star.1 (isPell_one a1)))
          (by
            have t := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right h am1p
            rwa [pellZd_succ, mul_assoc, a1m, mul_one] at t)
      ⟨m + 1, by
        rw [show b = b * ⟨a, -1⟩ * ⟨a, 1⟩ by rw [mul_assoc, Eq.trans (mul_comm _ _) a1m]; simp,
          pellZd_succ, e]⟩
    else
      suffices ¬1 < b from ⟨0, show b = 1 from (Or.resolve_left (lt_or_eq_of_le h1) this).symm⟩
      fun h1l => by
      cases' b with x y
      exact by
        have bm : (_ * ⟨_, _⟩ : ℤ√d a1) = 1 := Pell.isPell_norm.1 hp
        have y0l : (0 : ℤ√d a1) < ⟨x - x, y - -y⟩ :=
          sub_lt_sub h1l fun hn : (1 : ℤ√d a1) ≤ ⟨x, -y⟩ => by
            have t := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left hn (le_trans zero_le_one h1)
            

Proof state:
a : ℕ
a1 : 1 < a
n : ℕ
a1p : 0 ≤ { re := ↑a, im := 1 }
am1p : 0 ≤ { re := ↑a, im := -1 }
a1m : { re := ↑a, im := 1 } * { re := ↑a, im := -1 } = 1
x y : ℤ
h1 : 1 ≤ { re := x, im := y }
hp : IsPell { re := x, im := y }
h : { re := x, im := y } ≤ pellZd a1 (n + 1)
ha : ¬{ re := ↑a, im := 1 } ≤ { re := x, im := y }
h1l : 1 < { re := x, im := y }
bm : { re := x, im := y } * { re := { re := x, im := y }.re, im := -{ re := x, im := y }.im } = 1
hn : 1 ≤ { re := x, im := -y }
t : { re := x, im := y } * 1 ≤ { re := x, im := y } * { re := x, im := -y }
⊢ False

Next tactic:
erw [bm, mul_one] at t
theorem eq_pell_lem : ∀ (n) (b : ℤ√(d a1)), 1 ≤ b → IsPell b →
    b ≤ pellZd a1 n → ∃ n, b = pellZd a1 n
  | 0, b => fun h1 _ hl => ⟨0, @Zsqrtd.le_antisymm _ (dnsq a1) _ _ hl h1⟩
  | n + 1, b => fun h1 hp h =>
    have a1p : (0 : ℤ√(d a1)) ≤ ⟨a, 1⟩ := trivial
    have am1p : (0 : ℤ√(d a1)) ≤ ⟨a, -1⟩ := show (_ : Nat) ≤ _ by simp; exact Nat.pred_le _
    have a1m : (⟨a, 1⟩ * ⟨a, -1⟩ : ℤ√(d a1)) = 1 := isPell_norm.1 (isPell_one a1)
    if ha : (⟨↑a, 1⟩ : ℤ√(d a1)) ≤ b then
      let ⟨m, e⟩ :=
        eq_pell_lem n (b * ⟨a, -1⟩) (by rw [← a1m]; exact mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right ha am1p)
          (isPell_mul hp (isPell_star.1 (isPell_one a1)))
          (by
            have t := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right h am1p
            rwa [pellZd_succ, mul_assoc, a1m, mul_one] at t)
      ⟨m + 1, by
        rw [show b = b * ⟨a, -1⟩ * ⟨a, 1⟩ by rw [mul_assoc, Eq.trans (mul_comm _ _) a1m]; simp,
          pellZd_succ, e]⟩
    else
      suffices ¬1 < b from ⟨0, show b = 1 from (Or.resolve_left (lt_or_eq_of_le h1) this).symm⟩
      fun h1l => by
      cases' b with x y
      exact by
        have bm : (_ * ⟨_, _⟩ : ℤ√d a1) = 1 := Pell.isPell_norm.1 hp
        have y0l : (0 : ℤ√d a1) < ⟨x - x, y - -y⟩ :=
          sub_lt_sub h1l fun hn : (1 : ℤ√d a1) ≤ ⟨x, -y⟩ => by
            have t := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left hn (le_trans zero_le_one h1)
            erw [bm, mul_one] at t
            

Proof state:
a : ℕ
a1 : 1 < a
n : ℕ
a1p : 0 ≤ { re := ↑a, im := 1 }
am1p : 0 ≤ { re := ↑a, im := -1 }
a1m : { re := ↑a, im := 1 } * { re := ↑a, im := -1 } = 1
x y : ℤ
h1 : 1 ≤ { re := x, im := y }
hp : IsPell { re := x, im := y }
h : { re := x, im := y } ≤ pellZd a1 (n + 1)
ha : ¬{ re := ↑a, im := 1 } ≤ { re := x, im := y }
h1l : 1 < { re := x, im := y }
bm : { re := x, im := y } * { re := { re := x, im := y }.re, im := -{ re := x, im := y }.im } = 1
hn : 1 ≤ { re := x, im := -y }
t : { re := x, im := y } ≤ 1
⊢ False

Next tactic:
exact h1l t
theorem eq_pell_lem : ∀ (n) (b : ℤ√(d a1)), 1 ≤ b → IsPell b →
    b ≤ pellZd a1 n → ∃ n, b = pellZd a1 n
  | 0, b => fun h1 _ hl => ⟨0, @Zsqrtd.le_antisymm _ (dnsq a1) _ _ hl h1⟩
  | n + 1, b => fun h1 hp h =>
    have a1p : (0 : ℤ√(d a1)) ≤ ⟨a, 1⟩ := trivial
    have am1p : (0 : ℤ√(d a1)) ≤ ⟨a, -1⟩ := show (_ : Nat) ≤ _ by simp; exact Nat.pred_le _
    have a1m : (⟨a, 1⟩ * ⟨a, -1⟩ : ℤ√(d a1)) = 1 := isPell_norm.1 (isPell_one a1)
    if ha : (⟨↑a, 1⟩ : ℤ√(d a1)) ≤ b then
      let ⟨m, e⟩ :=
        eq_pell_lem n (b * ⟨a, -1⟩) (by rw [← a1m]; exact mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right ha am1p)
          (isPell_mul hp (isPell_star.1 (isPell_one a1)))
          (by
            have t := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right h am1p
            rwa [pellZd_succ, mul_assoc, a1m, mul_one] at t)
      ⟨m + 1, by
        rw [show b = b * ⟨a, -1⟩ * ⟨a, 1⟩ by rw [mul_assoc, Eq.trans (mul_comm _ _) a1m]; simp,
          pellZd_succ, e]⟩
    else
      suffices ¬1 < b from ⟨0, show b = 1 from (Or.resolve_left (lt_or_eq_of_le h1) this).symm⟩
      fun h1l => by
      cases' b with x y
      exact by
        have bm : (_ * ⟨_, _⟩ : ℤ√d a1) = 1 := Pell.isPell_norm.1 hp
        have y0l : (0 : ℤ√d a1) < ⟨x - x, y - -y⟩ :=
          sub_lt_sub h1l fun hn : (1 : ℤ√d a1) ≤ ⟨x, -y⟩ => by
            have t := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left hn (le_trans zero_le_one h1)
            erw [bm, mul_one] at t
            exact h1l t
        

Proof state:
a : ℕ
a1 : 1 < a
n : ℕ
a1p : 0 ≤ { re := ↑a, im := 1 }
am1p : 0 ≤ { re := ↑a, im := -1 }
a1m : { re := ↑a, im := 1 } * { re := ↑a, im := -1 } = 1
x y : ℤ
h1 : 1 ≤ { re := x, im := y }
hp : IsPell { re := x, im := y }
h : { re := x, im := y } ≤ pellZd a1 (n + 1)
ha : ¬{ re := ↑a, im := 1 } ≤ { re := x, im := y }
h1l : 1 < { re := x, im := y }
bm : { re := x, im := y } * { re := { re := x, im := y }.re, im := -{ re := x, im := y }.im } = 1
y0l : 0 < { re := x - x, im := y - -y }
⊢ False

Next tactic:
have yl2 : (⟨_, _⟩ : ℤ√_) < ⟨_, _⟩ :=
          show (⟨x, y⟩ - ⟨x, -y⟩ : ℤ√d a1) < ⟨a, 1⟩ - ⟨a, -1⟩ from
            sub_lt_sub ha fun hn : (⟨x, -y⟩ : ℤ√d a1) ≤ ⟨a, -1⟩ => by
              have t := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right
                      (mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left hn (le_trans zero_le_one h1)) a1p
              erw [bm, one_mul, mul_assoc, Eq.trans (mul_comm _ _) a1m, mul_one] at t
              exact ha t
theorem eq_pell_lem : ∀ (n) (b : ℤ√(d a1)), 1 ≤ b → IsPell b →
    b ≤ pellZd a1 n → ∃ n, b = pellZd a1 n
  | 0, b => fun h1 _ hl => ⟨0, @Zsqrtd.le_antisymm _ (dnsq a1) _ _ hl h1⟩
  | n + 1, b => fun h1 hp h =>
    have a1p : (0 : ℤ√(d a1)) ≤ ⟨a, 1⟩ := trivial
    have am1p : (0 : ℤ√(d a1)) ≤ ⟨a, -1⟩ := show (_ : Nat) ≤ _ by simp; exact Nat.pred_le _
    have a1m : (⟨a, 1⟩ * ⟨a, -1⟩ : ℤ√(d a1)) = 1 := isPell_norm.1 (isPell_one a1)
    if ha : (⟨↑a, 1⟩ : ℤ√(d a1)) ≤ b then
      let ⟨m, e⟩ :=
        eq_pell_lem n (b * ⟨a, -1⟩) (by rw [← a1m]; exact mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right ha am1p)
          (isPell_mul hp (isPell_star.1 (isPell_one a1)))
          (by
            have t := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right h am1p
            rwa [pellZd_succ, mul_assoc, a1m, mul_one] at t)
      ⟨m + 1, by
        rw [show b = b * ⟨a, -1⟩ * ⟨a, 1⟩ by rw [mul_assoc, Eq.trans (mul_comm _ _) a1m]; simp,
          pellZd_succ, e]⟩
    else
      suffices ¬1 < b from ⟨0, show b = 1 from (Or.resolve_left (lt_or_eq_of_le h1) this).symm⟩
      fun h1l => by
      cases' b with x y
      exact by
        have bm : (_ * ⟨_, _⟩ : ℤ√d a1) = 1 := Pell.isPell_norm.1 hp
        have y0l : (0 : ℤ√d a1) < ⟨x - x, y - -y⟩ :=
          sub_lt_sub h1l fun hn : (1 : ℤ√d a1) ≤ ⟨x, -y⟩ => by
            have t := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left hn (le_trans zero_le_one h1)
            erw [bm, mul_one] at t
            exact h1l t
        have yl2 : (⟨_, _⟩ : ℤ√_) < ⟨_, _⟩ :=
          show (⟨x, y⟩ - ⟨x, -y⟩ : ℤ√d a1) < ⟨a, 1⟩ - ⟨a, -1⟩ from
            sub_lt_sub ha fun hn : (⟨x, -y⟩ : ℤ√d a1) ≤ ⟨a, -1⟩ => by
              

Proof state:
a : ℕ
a1 : 1 < a
n : ℕ
a1p : 0 ≤ { re := ↑a, im := 1 }
am1p : 0 ≤ { re := ↑a, im := -1 }
a1m : { re := ↑a, im := 1 } * { re := ↑a, im := -1 } = 1
x y : ℤ
h1 : 1 ≤ { re := x, im := y }
hp : IsPell { re := x, im := y }
h : { re := x, im := y } ≤ pellZd a1 (n + 1)
ha : ¬{ re := ↑a, im := 1 } ≤ { re := x, im := y }
h1l : 1 < { re := x, im := y }
bm : { re := x, im := y } * { re := { re := x, im := y }.re, im := -{ re := x, im := y }.im } = 1
y0l : 0 < { re := x - x, im := y - -y }
hn : { re := x, im := -y } ≤ { re := ↑a, im := -1 }
⊢ False

Next tactic:
have t := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right
                      (mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left hn (le_trans zero_le_one h1)) a1p
theorem eq_pell_lem : ∀ (n) (b : ℤ√(d a1)), 1 ≤ b → IsPell b →
    b ≤ pellZd a1 n → ∃ n, b = pellZd a1 n
  | 0, b => fun h1 _ hl => ⟨0, @Zsqrtd.le_antisymm _ (dnsq a1) _ _ hl h1⟩
  | n + 1, b => fun h1 hp h =>
    have a1p : (0 : ℤ√(d a1)) ≤ ⟨a, 1⟩ := trivial
    have am1p : (0 : ℤ√(d a1)) ≤ ⟨a, -1⟩ := show (_ : Nat) ≤ _ by simp; exact Nat.pred_le _
    have a1m : (⟨a, 1⟩ * ⟨a, -1⟩ : ℤ√(d a1)) = 1 := isPell_norm.1 (isPell_one a1)
    if ha : (⟨↑a, 1⟩ : ℤ√(d a1)) ≤ b then
      let ⟨m, e⟩ :=
        eq_pell_lem n (b * ⟨a, -1⟩) (by rw [← a1m]; exact mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right ha am1p)
          (isPell_mul hp (isPell_star.1 (isPell_one a1)))
          (by
            have t := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right h am1p
            rwa [pellZd_succ, mul_assoc, a1m, mul_one] at t)
      ⟨m + 1, by
        rw [show b = b * ⟨a, -1⟩ * ⟨a, 1⟩ by rw [mul_assoc, Eq.trans (mul_comm _ _) a1m]; simp,
          pellZd_succ, e]⟩
    else
      suffices ¬1 < b from ⟨0, show b = 1 from (Or.resolve_left (lt_or_eq_of_le h1) this).symm⟩
      fun h1l => by
      cases' b with x y
      exact by
        have bm : (_ * ⟨_, _⟩ : ℤ√d a1) = 1 := Pell.isPell_norm.1 hp
        have y0l : (0 : ℤ√d a1) < ⟨x - x, y - -y⟩ :=
          sub_lt_sub h1l fun hn : (1 : ℤ√d a1) ≤ ⟨x, -y⟩ => by
            have t := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left hn (le_trans zero_le_one h1)
            erw [bm, mul_one] at t
            exact h1l t
        have yl2 : (⟨_, _⟩ : ℤ√_) < ⟨_, _⟩ :=
          show (⟨x, y⟩ - ⟨x, -y⟩ : ℤ√d a1) < ⟨a, 1⟩ - ⟨a, -1⟩ from
            sub_lt_sub ha fun hn : (⟨x, -y⟩ : ℤ√d a1) ≤ ⟨a, -1⟩ => by
              have t := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right
                      (mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left hn (le_trans zero_le_one h1)) a1p
              

Proof state:
a : ℕ
a1 : 1 < a
n : ℕ
a1p : 0 ≤ { re := ↑a, im := 1 }
am1p : 0 ≤ { re := ↑a, im := -1 }
a1m : { re := ↑a, im := 1 } * { re := ↑a, im := -1 } = 1
x y : ℤ
h1 : 1 ≤ { re := x, im := y }
hp : IsPell { re := x, im := y }
h : { re := x, im := y } ≤ pellZd a1 (n + 1)
ha : ¬{ re := ↑a, im := 1 } ≤ { re := x, im := y }
h1l : 1 < { re := x, im := y }
bm : { re := x, im := y } * { re := { re := x, im := y }.re, im := -{ re := x, im := y }.im } = 1
y0l : 0 < { re := x - x, im := y - -y }
hn : { re := x, im := -y } ≤ { re := ↑a, im := -1 }
t :
  { re := x, im := y } * { re := x, im := -y } * { re := ↑a, im := 1 } ≤
    { re := x, im := y } * { re := ↑a, im := -1 } * { re := ↑a, im := 1 }
⊢ False

Next tactic:
erw [bm, one_mul, mul_assoc, Eq.trans (mul_comm _ _) a1m, mul_one] at t
theorem eq_pell_lem : ∀ (n) (b : ℤ√(d a1)), 1 ≤ b → IsPell b →
    b ≤ pellZd a1 n → ∃ n, b = pellZd a1 n
  | 0, b => fun h1 _ hl => ⟨0, @Zsqrtd.le_antisymm _ (dnsq a1) _ _ hl h1⟩
  | n + 1, b => fun h1 hp h =>
    have a1p : (0 : ℤ√(d a1)) ≤ ⟨a, 1⟩ := trivial
    have am1p : (0 : ℤ√(d a1)) ≤ ⟨a, -1⟩ := show (_ : Nat) ≤ _ by simp; exact Nat.pred_le _
    have a1m : (⟨a, 1⟩ * ⟨a, -1⟩ : ℤ√(d a1)) = 1 := isPell_norm.1 (isPell_one a1)
    if ha : (⟨↑a, 1⟩ : ℤ√(d a1)) ≤ b then
      let ⟨m, e⟩ :=
        eq_pell_lem n (b * ⟨a, -1⟩) (by rw [← a1m]; exact mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right ha am1p)
          (isPell_mul hp (isPell_star.1 (isPell_one a1)))
          (by
            have t := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right h am1p
            rwa [pellZd_succ, mul_assoc, a1m, mul_one] at t)
      ⟨m + 1, by
        rw [show b = b * ⟨a, -1⟩ * ⟨a, 1⟩ by rw [mul_assoc, Eq.trans (mul_comm _ _) a1m]; simp,
          pellZd_succ, e]⟩
    else
      suffices ¬1 < b from ⟨0, show b = 1 from (Or.resolve_left (lt_or_eq_of_le h1) this).symm⟩
      fun h1l => by
      cases' b with x y
      exact by
        have bm : (_ * ⟨_, _⟩ : ℤ√d a1) = 1 := Pell.isPell_norm.1 hp
        have y0l : (0 : ℤ√d a1) < ⟨x - x, y - -y⟩ :=
          sub_lt_sub h1l fun hn : (1 : ℤ√d a1) ≤ ⟨x, -y⟩ => by
            have t := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left hn (le_trans zero_le_one h1)
            erw [bm, mul_one] at t
            exact h1l t
        have yl2 : (⟨_, _⟩ : ℤ√_) < ⟨_, _⟩ :=
          show (⟨x, y⟩ - ⟨x, -y⟩ : ℤ√d a1) < ⟨a, 1⟩ - ⟨a, -1⟩ from
            sub_lt_sub ha fun hn : (⟨x, -y⟩ : ℤ√d a1) ≤ ⟨a, -1⟩ => by
              have t := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right
                      (mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left hn (le_trans zero_le_one h1)) a1p
              erw [bm, one_mul, mul_assoc, Eq.trans (mul_comm _ _) a1m, mul_one] at t
              

Proof state:
a : ℕ
a1 : 1 < a
n : ℕ
a1p : 0 ≤ { re := ↑a, im := 1 }
am1p : 0 ≤ { re := ↑a, im := -1 }
a1m : { re := ↑a, im := 1 } * { re := ↑a, im := -1 } = 1
x y : ℤ
h1 : 1 ≤ { re := x, im := y }
hp : IsPell { re := x, im := y }
h : { re := x, im := y } ≤ pellZd a1 (n + 1)
ha : ¬{ re := ↑a, im := 1 } ≤ { re := x, im := y }
h1l : 1 < { re := x, im := y }
bm : { re := x, im := y } * { re := { re := x, im := y }.re, im := -{ re := x, im := y }.im } = 1
y0l : 0 < { re := x - x, im := y - -y }
hn : { re := x, im := -y } ≤ { re := ↑a, im := -1 }
t : { re := ↑a, im := 1 } ≤ { re := x, im := y }
⊢ False

Next tactic:
exact ha t
theorem eq_pell_lem : ∀ (n) (b : ℤ√(d a1)), 1 ≤ b → IsPell b →
    b ≤ pellZd a1 n → ∃ n, b = pellZd a1 n
  | 0, b => fun h1 _ hl => ⟨0, @Zsqrtd.le_antisymm _ (dnsq a1) _ _ hl h1⟩
  | n + 1, b => fun h1 hp h =>
    have a1p : (0 : ℤ√(d a1)) ≤ ⟨a, 1⟩ := trivial
    have am1p : (0 : ℤ√(d a1)) ≤ ⟨a, -1⟩ := show (_ : Nat) ≤ _ by simp; exact Nat.pred_le _
    have a1m : (⟨a, 1⟩ * ⟨a, -1⟩ : ℤ√(d a1)) = 1 := isPell_norm.1 (isPell_one a1)
    if ha : (⟨↑a, 1⟩ : ℤ√(d a1)) ≤ b then
      let ⟨m, e⟩ :=
        eq_pell_lem n (b * ⟨a, -1⟩) (by rw [← a1m]; exact mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right ha am1p)
          (isPell_mul hp (isPell_star.1 (isPell_one a1)))
          (by
            have t := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right h am1p
            rwa [pellZd_succ, mul_assoc, a1m, mul_one] at t)
      ⟨m + 1, by
        rw [show b = b * ⟨a, -1⟩ * ⟨a, 1⟩ by rw [mul_assoc, Eq.trans (mul_comm _ _) a1m]; simp,
          pellZd_succ, e]⟩
    else
      suffices ¬1 < b from ⟨0, show b = 1 from (Or.resolve_left (lt_or_eq_of_le h1) this).symm⟩
      fun h1l => by
      cases' b with x y
      exact by
        have bm : (_ * ⟨_, _⟩ : ℤ√d a1) = 1 := Pell.isPell_norm.1 hp
        have y0l : (0 : ℤ√d a1) < ⟨x - x, y - -y⟩ :=
          sub_lt_sub h1l fun hn : (1 : ℤ√d a1) ≤ ⟨x, -y⟩ => by
            have t := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left hn (le_trans zero_le_one h1)
            erw [bm, mul_one] at t
            exact h1l t
        have yl2 : (⟨_, _⟩ : ℤ√_) < ⟨_, _⟩ :=
          show (⟨x, y⟩ - ⟨x, -y⟩ : ℤ√d a1) < ⟨a, 1⟩ - ⟨a, -1⟩ from
            sub_lt_sub ha fun hn : (⟨x, -y⟩ : ℤ√d a1) ≤ ⟨a, -1⟩ => by
              have t := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right
                      (mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left hn (le_trans zero_le_one h1)) a1p
              erw [bm, one_mul, mul_assoc, Eq.trans (mul_comm _ _) a1m, mul_one] at t
              exact ha t
        

Proof state:
a : ℕ
a1 : 1 < a
n : ℕ
a1p : 0 ≤ { re := ↑a, im := 1 }
am1p : 0 ≤ { re := ↑a, im := -1 }
a1m : { re := ↑a, im := 1 } * { re := ↑a, im := -1 } = 1
x y : ℤ
h1 : 1 ≤ { re := x, im := y }
hp : IsPell { re := x, im := y }
h : { re := x, im := y } ≤ pellZd a1 (n + 1)
ha : ¬{ re := ↑a, im := 1 } ≤ { re := x, im := y }
h1l : 1 < { re := x, im := y }
bm : { re := x, im := y } * { re := { re := x, im := y }.re, im := -{ re := x, im := y }.im } = 1
y0l : 0 < { re := x - x, im := y - -y }
yl2 :
  { re := { re := x, im := y }.re + (-{ re := x, im := -y }).re,
      im := { re := x, im := y }.im + (-{ re := x, im := -y }).im } <
    { re := { re := ↑a, im := 1 }.re + (-{ re := ↑a, im := -1 }).re,
      im := { re := ↑a, im := 1 }.im + (-{ re := ↑a, im := -1 }).im }
⊢ False

Next tactic:
simp only [sub_self, sub_neg_eq_add] at y0l
theorem eq_pell_lem : ∀ (n) (b : ℤ√(d a1)), 1 ≤ b → IsPell b →
    b ≤ pellZd a1 n → ∃ n, b = pellZd a1 n
  | 0, b => fun h1 _ hl => ⟨0, @Zsqrtd.le_antisymm _ (dnsq a1) _ _ hl h1⟩
  | n + 1, b => fun h1 hp h =>
    have a1p : (0 : ℤ√(d a1)) ≤ ⟨a, 1⟩ := trivial
    have am1p : (0 : ℤ√(d a1)) ≤ ⟨a, -1⟩ := show (_ : Nat) ≤ _ by simp; exact Nat.pred_le _
    have a1m : (⟨a, 1⟩ * ⟨a, -1⟩ : ℤ√(d a1)) = 1 := isPell_norm.1 (isPell_one a1)
    if ha : (⟨↑a, 1⟩ : ℤ√(d a1)) ≤ b then
      let ⟨m, e⟩ :=
        eq_pell_lem n (b * ⟨a, -1⟩) (by rw [← a1m]; exact mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right ha am1p)
          (isPell_mul hp (isPell_star.1 (isPell_one a1)))
          (by
            have t := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right h am1p
            rwa [pellZd_succ, mul_assoc, a1m, mul_one] at t)
      ⟨m + 1, by
        rw [show b = b * ⟨a, -1⟩ * ⟨a, 1⟩ by rw [mul_assoc, Eq.trans (mul_comm _ _) a1m]; simp,
          pellZd_succ, e]⟩
    else
      suffices ¬1 < b from ⟨0, show b = 1 from (Or.resolve_left (lt_or_eq_of_le h1) this).symm⟩
      fun h1l => by
      cases' b with x y
      exact by
        have bm : (_ * ⟨_, _⟩ : ℤ√d a1) = 1 := Pell.isPell_norm.1 hp
        have y0l : (0 : ℤ√d a1) < ⟨x - x, y - -y⟩ :=
          sub_lt_sub h1l fun hn : (1 : ℤ√d a1) ≤ ⟨x, -y⟩ => by
            have t := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left hn (le_trans zero_le_one h1)
            erw [bm, mul_one] at t
            exact h1l t
        have yl2 : (⟨_, _⟩ : ℤ√_) < ⟨_, _⟩ :=
          show (⟨x, y⟩ - ⟨x, -y⟩ : ℤ√d a1) < ⟨a, 1⟩ - ⟨a, -1⟩ from
            sub_lt_sub ha fun hn : (⟨x, -y⟩ : ℤ√d a1) ≤ ⟨a, -1⟩ => by
              have t := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right
                      (mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left hn (le_trans zero_le_one h1)) a1p
              erw [bm, one_mul, mul_assoc, Eq.trans (mul_comm _ _) a1m, mul_one] at t
              exact ha t
        simp only [sub_self, sub_neg_eq_add] at y0l; 

Proof state:
a : ℕ
a1 : 1 < a
n : ℕ
a1p : 0 ≤ { re := ↑a, im := 1 }
am1p : 0 ≤ { re := ↑a, im := -1 }
a1m : { re := ↑a, im := 1 } * { re := ↑a, im := -1 } = 1
x y : ℤ
h1 : 1 ≤ { re := x, im := y }
hp : IsPell { re := x, im := y }
h : { re := x, im := y } ≤ pellZd a1 (n + 1)
ha : ¬{ re := ↑a, im := 1 } ≤ { re := x, im := y }
h1l : 1 < { re := x, im := y }
bm : { re := x, im := y } * { re := { re := x, im := y }.re, im := -{ re := x, im := y }.im } = 1
yl2 :
  { re := { re := x, im := y }.re + (-{ re := x, im := -y }).re,
      im := { re := x, im := y }.im + (-{ re := x, im := -y }).im } <
    { re := { re := ↑a, im := 1 }.re + (-{ re := ↑a, im := -1 }).re,
      im := { re := ↑a, im := 1 }.im + (-{ re := ↑a, im := -1 }).im }
y0l : 0 < { re := 0, im := y + y }
⊢ False

Next tactic:
simp only [Zsqrtd.neg_re, add_right_neg,
          Zsqrtd.neg_im, neg_neg] at yl2