private theorem mul_le_of_limit_aux {α β r s} [IsWellOrder α r] [IsWellOrder β s] {c}
    (h : IsLimit (type s)) (H : ∀ b' < type s, type r * b' ≤ c) (l : c < type r * type s) :
    False := by
  suffices ∀ a b, Prod.Lex s r (b, a) (enum _ _ l) by
    cases' enum _ _ l with b a
    exact irrefl _ (this _ _)
  intro a b
  rw [← typein_lt_typein (Prod.Lex s r), typein_enum]
  have := H _ (h.2 _ (typein_lt_type s b))
  rw [mul_succ] at this
  have := ((add_lt_add_iff_left _).2 (typein_lt_type _ a)).trans_le this
  refine' (RelEmbedding.ofMonotone (fun a => _) fun a b => _).ordinal_type_le.trans_lt this
  · rcases a with ⟨⟨b', a'⟩, h⟩
    by_cases e : b = b'
    · refine' Sum.inr ⟨a', _⟩
      subst e
      cases' h with _ _ _ _ h _ _ _ h
      · exact (irrefl _ h).elim
      · exact h
    · refine' Sum.inl (⟨b', _⟩, a')
      cases' h with _ _ _ _ h _ _ _ h
      · exact h
      · exact (e rfl).elim
  · rcases a with ⟨⟨b₁, a₁⟩, h₁⟩
    rcases b with ⟨⟨b₂, a₂⟩, h₂⟩
    intro h
    by_cases e₁ : b = b₁ <;> by_cases e₂ : b = b₂
    · substs b₁ b₂
      simpa only [subrel_val, Prod.lex_def, @irrefl _ s _ b, true_and_iff, false_or_iff,
        eq_self_iff_true, dif_pos, Sum.lex_inr_inr] using h
    · subst b₁
      simp only [subrel_val, Prod.lex_def, e₂, Prod.lex_def, dif_pos, subrel_val, eq_self_iff_true,
        or_false_iff, dif_neg, not_false_iff, Sum.lex_inr_inl, false_and_iff] at h ⊢
      cases' h₂ with _ _ _ _ h₂_h h₂_h <;> [exact asymm h h₂_h; exact e₂ rfl]
    -- Porting note: `cc` hadn't ported yet.
    · 

Proof state:
case pos
α✝ : Type u_1
β✝ : Type u_2
γ : Type u_3
r✝ : α✝ → α✝ → Prop
s✝ : β✝ → β✝ → Prop
t : γ → γ → Prop
α β : Type u_4
r : α → α → Prop
s : β → β → Prop
inst✝¹ : IsWellOrder α r
inst✝ : IsWellOrder β s
c : Ordinal.{u_4}
h✝ : IsLimit (type s)
H : ∀ b' < type s, type r * b' ≤ c
l : c < type r * type s
a : α
b : β
this✝ : type r * typein s b + type r ≤ c
this : type r * typein s b + typein r a < c
b₁ : β
a₁ : α
h₁ : (b₁, a₁) ∈ {b_1 | Prod.Lex s r b_1 (b, a)}
b₂ : β
a₂ : α
h₂ : (b₂, a₂) ∈ {b_1 | Prod.Lex s r b_1 (b, a)}
h :
  Subrel (Prod.Lex s r) {b_1 | Prod.Lex s r b_1 (b, a)} { val := (b₁, a₁), property := h₁ }
    { val := (b₂, a₂), property := h₂ }
e₁ : ¬b = b₁
e₂ : b = b₂
⊢ Sum.Lex (Prod.Lex (Subrel s {b_1 | s b_1 b}) r) (Subrel r {b | r b a})
    ((fun a_1 =>
        Subtype.casesOn a_1 fun val h =>
          Prod.casesOn (motive := fun x => x ∈ {b_1 | Prod.Lex s r b_1 (b, a)} → ↑{b_1 | s b_1 b} × α ⊕ ↑{b | r b a})
            val
            (fun b' a' h =>
              if e : b = b' then Sum.inr { val := a', property := (_ : a' ∈ {b | r b a}) }
              else Sum.inl ({ val := b', property := (_ : b' ∈ {b_1 | s b_1 b}) }, a'))
            h)
      { val := (b₁, a₁), property := h₁ })
    ((fun a_1 =>
        Subtype.casesOn a_1 fun val h =>
          Prod.casesOn (motive := fun x => x ∈ {b_1 | Prod.Lex s r b_1 (b, a)} → ↑{b_1 | s b_1 b} × α ⊕ ↑{b | r b a})
            val
            (fun b' a' h =>
              if e : b = b' then Sum.inr { val := a', property := (_ : a' ∈ {b | r b a}) }
              else Sum.inl ({ val := b', property := (_ : b' ∈ {b_1 | s b_1 b}) }, a'))
            h)
      { val := (b₂, a₂), property := h₂ })

Next tactic:
simp [e₂, dif_neg e₁, show b₂ ≠ b₁ from e₂ ▸ e₁]