l3lab/ntp-mathlib huggingface dataset:
private theorem cl_cl {X : Compactum} (A : Set X) : cl (cl A) ⊆ cl A := by
  rintro _ ⟨F, hF, rfl⟩
  -- Notation to be used in this proof.
  let fsu := Finset (Set (Ultrafilter X))
  let ssu := Set (Set (Ultrafilter X))
  let ι : fsu → ssu := fun x ↦ ↑x
  let C0 : ssu := { Z | ∃ B ∈ F, X.str ⁻¹' B = Z }
  let AA := { G : Ultrafilter X | A ∈ G }
  let C1 := insert AA C0
  let C2 := finiteInterClosure C1
  -- C0 is closed under intersections.
  have claim1 : ∀ (B) (_ : B ∈ C0) (C) (_ : C ∈ C0), B ∩ C ∈ C0 := by
    rintro B ⟨Q, hQ, rfl⟩ C ⟨R, hR, rfl⟩
    use Q ∩ R
    simp only [and_true_iff, eq_self_iff_true, Set.preimage_inter]
    exact inter_sets _ hQ hR
  -- All sets in C0 are nonempty.
  have claim2 : ∀ B ∈ C0, Set.Nonempty B := by
    rintro B ⟨Q, hQ, rfl⟩
    obtain ⟨q⟩ := Filter.nonempty_of_mem hQ
    use X.incl q
    simpa
  -- The intersection of AA with every set in C0 is nonempty.
  have claim3 : ∀ B ∈ C0, (AA ∩ B).Nonempty := by
    rintro B ⟨Q, hQ, rfl⟩
    have : (Q ∩ cl A).Nonempty := Filter.nonempty_of_mem (inter_mem hQ hF)
    rcases this with ⟨q, hq1, P, hq2, hq3⟩
    refine' ⟨P, hq2, _⟩
    rw [← hq3] at hq1
    simpa
  -- Suffices to show that the intersection of any finite subcollection of C1 is nonempty.
  suffices ∀ T : fsu, ι T ⊆ C1 → (⋂₀ ι T).Nonempty by
    obtain ⟨G, h1⟩ := exists_ultrafilter_of_finite_inter_nonempty _ this
    use X.join G
    have : G.map X.str = F := Ultrafilter.coe_le_coe.1 fun S hS => h1 (Or.inr ⟨S, hS, rfl⟩)
    rw [join_distrib, this]
    exact ⟨h1 (Or.inl rfl), rfl⟩
  -- C2 is closed under finite intersections (by construction!).
  have claim4 := finiteInterClosure_finiteInter C1
  -- C0 is closed under finite intersections by claim1.
  have claim5 : FiniteInter C0 := ⟨⟨_, univ_mem, Set.preimage_univ⟩, claim1⟩
  -- Every element of C2 is nonempty.
  have claim6 : ∀ P ∈ C2, (P : Set (Ultrafilter X)).Nonempty := by
    suffices ∀ P ∈ C2, P ∈ C0 ∨ ∃ Q ∈ C0, P = AA ∩ Q by
      intro P hP
      cases' this P hP with h h
      · exact claim2 _ h
      · rcases h with ⟨Q, hQ, rfl⟩
        exact claim3 _ hQ
    

Proof state:
X : Compactum
A : Set X.A
F : Ultrafilter X.A
hF : F ∈ Compactum.basic (Compactum.cl A)
fsu : Type u_1 := Finset (Set (Ultrafilter X.A))
ssu : Type u_1 := Set (Set (Ultrafilter X.A))
ι : fsu → ssu := fun x => ↑x
C0 : ssu := {Z | ∃ B ∈ F, str X ⁻¹' B = Z}
AA : Set (Ultrafilter X.A) := {G | A ∈ G}
C1 : ssu := insert AA C0
C2 : Set (Set (Ultrafilter X.A)) := finiteInterClosure C1
claim1 : ∀ B ∈ C0, ∀ C ∈ C0, B ∩ C ∈ C0
claim2 : ∀ B ∈ C0, Set.Nonempty B
claim3 : ∀ B ∈ C0, Set.Nonempty (AA ∩ B)
claim4 : FiniteInter (finiteInterClosure C1)
claim5 : FiniteInter C0
⊢ ∀ P ∈ C2, P ∈ C0 ∨ ∃ Q ∈ C0, P = AA ∩ Q

Next tactic:
intro P hP
private theorem cl_cl {X : Compactum} (A : Set X) : cl (cl A) ⊆ cl A := by
  rintro _ ⟨F, hF, rfl⟩
  -- Notation to be used in this proof.
  let fsu := Finset (Set (Ultrafilter X))
  let ssu := Set (Set (Ultrafilter X))
  let ι : fsu → ssu := fun x ↦ ↑x
  let C0 : ssu := { Z | ∃ B ∈ F, X.str ⁻¹' B = Z }
  let AA := { G : Ultrafilter X | A ∈ G }
  let C1 := insert AA C0
  let C2 := finiteInterClosure C1
  -- C0 is closed under intersections.
  have claim1 : ∀ (B) (_ : B ∈ C0) (C) (_ : C ∈ C0), B ∩ C ∈ C0 := by
    rintro B ⟨Q, hQ, rfl⟩ C ⟨R, hR, rfl⟩
    use Q ∩ R
    simp only [and_true_iff, eq_self_iff_true, Set.preimage_inter]
    exact inter_sets _ hQ hR
  -- All sets in C0 are nonempty.
  have claim2 : ∀ B ∈ C0, Set.Nonempty B := by
    rintro B ⟨Q, hQ, rfl⟩
    obtain ⟨q⟩ := Filter.nonempty_of_mem hQ
    use X.incl q
    simpa
  -- The intersection of AA with every set in C0 is nonempty.
  have claim3 : ∀ B ∈ C0, (AA ∩ B).Nonempty := by
    rintro B ⟨Q, hQ, rfl⟩
    have : (Q ∩ cl A).Nonempty := Filter.nonempty_of_mem (inter_mem hQ hF)
    rcases this with ⟨q, hq1, P, hq2, hq3⟩
    refine' ⟨P, hq2, _⟩
    rw [← hq3] at hq1
    simpa
  -- Suffices to show that the intersection of any finite subcollection of C1 is nonempty.
  suffices ∀ T : fsu, ι T ⊆ C1 → (⋂₀ ι T).Nonempty by
    obtain ⟨G, h1⟩ := exists_ultrafilter_of_finite_inter_nonempty _ this
    use X.join G
    have : G.map X.str = F := Ultrafilter.coe_le_coe.1 fun S hS => h1 (Or.inr ⟨S, hS, rfl⟩)
    rw [join_distrib, this]
    exact ⟨h1 (Or.inl rfl), rfl⟩
  -- C2 is closed under finite intersections (by construction!).
  have claim4 := finiteInterClosure_finiteInter C1
  -- C0 is closed under finite intersections by claim1.
  have claim5 : FiniteInter C0 := ⟨⟨_, univ_mem, Set.preimage_univ⟩, claim1⟩
  -- Every element of C2 is nonempty.
  have claim6 : ∀ P ∈ C2, (P : Set (Ultrafilter X)).Nonempty := by
    suffices ∀ P ∈ C2, P ∈ C0 ∨ ∃ Q ∈ C0, P = AA ∩ Q by
      intro P hP
      cases' this P hP with h h
      · exact claim2 _ h
      · rcases h with ⟨Q, hQ, rfl⟩
        exact claim3 _ hQ
    intro P hP
    

Proof state:
X : Compactum
A : Set X.A
F : Ultrafilter X.A
hF : F ∈ Compactum.basic (Compactum.cl A)
fsu : Type u_1 := Finset (Set (Ultrafilter X.A))
ssu : Type u_1 := Set (Set (Ultrafilter X.A))
ι : fsu → ssu := fun x => ↑x
C0 : ssu := {Z | ∃ B ∈ F, str X ⁻¹' B = Z}
AA : Set (Ultrafilter X.A) := {G | A ∈ G}
C1 : ssu := insert AA C0
C2 : Set (Set (Ultrafilter X.A)) := finiteInterClosure C1
claim1 : ∀ B ∈ C0, ∀ C ∈ C0, B ∩ C ∈ C0
claim2 : ∀ B ∈ C0, Set.Nonempty B
claim3 : ∀ B ∈ C0, Set.Nonempty (AA ∩ B)
claim4 : FiniteInter (finiteInterClosure C1)
claim5 : FiniteInter C0
P : Set (Ultrafilter X.A)
hP : P ∈ C2
⊢ P ∈ C0 ∨ ∃ Q ∈ C0, P = AA ∩ Q

Next tactic:
exact claim5.finiteInterClosure_insert _ hP
private theorem cl_cl {X : Compactum} (A : Set X) : cl (cl A) ⊆ cl A := by
  rintro _ ⟨F, hF, rfl⟩
  -- Notation to be used in this proof.
  let fsu := Finset (Set (Ultrafilter X))
  let ssu := Set (Set (Ultrafilter X))
  let ι : fsu → ssu := fun x ↦ ↑x
  let C0 : ssu := { Z | ∃ B ∈ F, X.str ⁻¹' B = Z }
  let AA := { G : Ultrafilter X | A ∈ G }
  let C1 := insert AA C0
  let C2 := finiteInterClosure C1
  -- C0 is closed under intersections.
  have claim1 : ∀ (B) (_ : B ∈ C0) (C) (_ : C ∈ C0), B ∩ C ∈ C0 := by
    rintro B ⟨Q, hQ, rfl⟩ C ⟨R, hR, rfl⟩
    use Q ∩ R
    simp only [and_true_iff, eq_self_iff_true, Set.preimage_inter]
    exact inter_sets _ hQ hR
  -- All sets in C0 are nonempty.
  have claim2 : ∀ B ∈ C0, Set.Nonempty B := by
    rintro B ⟨Q, hQ, rfl⟩
    obtain ⟨q⟩ := Filter.nonempty_of_mem hQ
    use X.incl q
    simpa
  -- The intersection of AA with every set in C0 is nonempty.
  have claim3 : ∀ B ∈ C0, (AA ∩ B).Nonempty := by
    rintro B ⟨Q, hQ, rfl⟩
    have : (Q ∩ cl A).Nonempty := Filter.nonempty_of_mem (inter_mem hQ hF)
    rcases this with ⟨q, hq1, P, hq2, hq3⟩
    refine' ⟨P, hq2, _⟩
    rw [← hq3] at hq1
    simpa
  -- Suffices to show that the intersection of any finite subcollection of C1 is nonempty.
  suffices ∀ T : fsu, ι T ⊆ C1 → (⋂₀ ι T).Nonempty by
    obtain ⟨G, h1⟩ := exists_ultrafilter_of_finite_inter_nonempty _ this
    use X.join G
    have : G.map X.str = F := Ultrafilter.coe_le_coe.1 fun S hS => h1 (Or.inr ⟨S, hS, rfl⟩)
    rw [join_distrib, this]
    exact ⟨h1 (Or.inl rfl), rfl⟩
  -- C2 is closed under finite intersections (by construction!).
  have claim4 := finiteInterClosure_finiteInter C1
  -- C0 is closed under finite intersections by claim1.
  have claim5 : FiniteInter C0 := ⟨⟨_, univ_mem, Set.preimage_univ⟩, claim1⟩
  -- Every element of C2 is nonempty.
  have claim6 : ∀ P ∈ C2, (P : Set (Ultrafilter X)).Nonempty := by
    suffices ∀ P ∈ C2, P ∈ C0 ∨ ∃ Q ∈ C0, P = AA ∩ Q by
      intro P hP
      cases' this P hP with h h
      · exact claim2 _ h
      · rcases h with ⟨Q, hQ, rfl⟩
        exact claim3 _ hQ
    intro P hP
    exact claim5.finiteInterClosure_insert _ hP
  

Proof state:
case intro.intro
X : Compactum
A : Set X.A
F : Ultrafilter X.A
hF : F ∈ Compactum.basic (Compactum.cl A)
fsu : Type u_1 := Finset (Set (Ultrafilter X.A))
ssu : Type u_1 := Set (Set (Ultrafilter X.A))
ι : fsu → ssu := fun x => ↑x
C0 : ssu := {Z | ∃ B ∈ F, str X ⁻¹' B = Z}
AA : Set (Ultrafilter X.A) := {G | A ∈ G}
C1 : ssu := insert AA C0
C2 : Set (Set (Ultrafilter X.A)) := finiteInterClosure C1
claim1 : ∀ B ∈ C0, ∀ C ∈ C0, B ∩ C ∈ C0
claim2 : ∀ B ∈ C0, Set.Nonempty B
claim3 : ∀ B ∈ C0, Set.Nonempty (AA ∩ B)
claim4 : FiniteInter (finiteInterClosure C1)
claim5 : FiniteInter C0
claim6 : ∀ P ∈ C2, Set.Nonempty P
⊢ ∀ (T : fsu), ι T ⊆ C1 → Set.Nonempty (⋂₀ ι T)

Next tactic:
intro T hT
private theorem cl_cl {X : Compactum} (A : Set X) : cl (cl A) ⊆ cl A := by
  rintro _ ⟨F, hF, rfl⟩
  -- Notation to be used in this proof.
  let fsu := Finset (Set (Ultrafilter X))
  let ssu := Set (Set (Ultrafilter X))
  let ι : fsu → ssu := fun x ↦ ↑x
  let C0 : ssu := { Z | ∃ B ∈ F, X.str ⁻¹' B = Z }
  let AA := { G : Ultrafilter X | A ∈ G }
  let C1 := insert AA C0
  let C2 := finiteInterClosure C1
  -- C0 is closed under intersections.
  have claim1 : ∀ (B) (_ : B ∈ C0) (C) (_ : C ∈ C0), B ∩ C ∈ C0 := by
    rintro B ⟨Q, hQ, rfl⟩ C ⟨R, hR, rfl⟩
    use Q ∩ R
    simp only [and_true_iff, eq_self_iff_true, Set.preimage_inter]
    exact inter_sets _ hQ hR
  -- All sets in C0 are nonempty.
  have claim2 : ∀ B ∈ C0, Set.Nonempty B := by
    rintro B ⟨Q, hQ, rfl⟩
    obtain ⟨q⟩ := Filter.nonempty_of_mem hQ
    use X.incl q
    simpa
  -- The intersection of AA with every set in C0 is nonempty.
  have claim3 : ∀ B ∈ C0, (AA ∩ B).Nonempty := by
    rintro B ⟨Q, hQ, rfl⟩
    have : (Q ∩ cl A).Nonempty := Filter.nonempty_of_mem (inter_mem hQ hF)
    rcases this with ⟨q, hq1, P, hq2, hq3⟩
    refine' ⟨P, hq2, _⟩
    rw [← hq3] at hq1
    simpa
  -- Suffices to show that the intersection of any finite subcollection of C1 is nonempty.
  suffices ∀ T : fsu, ι T ⊆ C1 → (⋂₀ ι T).Nonempty by
    obtain ⟨G, h1⟩ := exists_ultrafilter_of_finite_inter_nonempty _ this
    use X.join G
    have : G.map X.str = F := Ultrafilter.coe_le_coe.1 fun S hS => h1 (Or.inr ⟨S, hS, rfl⟩)
    rw [join_distrib, this]
    exact ⟨h1 (Or.inl rfl), rfl⟩
  -- C2 is closed under finite intersections (by construction!).
  have claim4 := finiteInterClosure_finiteInter C1
  -- C0 is closed under finite intersections by claim1.
  have claim5 : FiniteInter C0 := ⟨⟨_, univ_mem, Set.preimage_univ⟩, claim1⟩
  -- Every element of C2 is nonempty.
  have claim6 : ∀ P ∈ C2, (P : Set (Ultrafilter X)).Nonempty := by
    suffices ∀ P ∈ C2, P ∈ C0 ∨ ∃ Q ∈ C0, P = AA ∩ Q by
      intro P hP
      cases' this P hP with h h
      · exact claim2 _ h
      · rcases h with ⟨Q, hQ, rfl⟩
        exact claim3 _ hQ
    intro P hP
    exact claim5.finiteInterClosure_insert _ hP
  intro T hT
  -- Suffices to show that the intersection of the T's is contained in C2.
  

Proof state:
case intro.intro
X : Compactum
A : Set X.A
F : Ultrafilter X.A
hF : F ∈ Compactum.basic (Compactum.cl A)
fsu : Type u_1 := Finset (Set (Ultrafilter X.A))
ssu : Type u_1 := Set (Set (Ultrafilter X.A))
ι : fsu → ssu := fun x => ↑x
C0 : ssu := {Z | ∃ B ∈ F, str X ⁻¹' B = Z}
AA : Set (Ultrafilter X.A) := {G | A ∈ G}
C1 : ssu := insert AA C0
C2 : Set (Set (Ultrafilter X.A)) := finiteInterClosure C1
claim1 : ∀ B ∈ C0, ∀ C ∈ C0, B ∩ C ∈ C0
claim2 : ∀ B ∈ C0, Set.Nonempty B
claim3 : ∀ B ∈ C0, Set.Nonempty (AA ∩ B)
claim4 : FiniteInter (finiteInterClosure C1)
claim5 : FiniteInter C0
claim6 : ∀ P ∈ C2, Set.Nonempty P
T : fsu
hT : ι T ⊆ C1
⊢ Set.Nonempty (⋂₀ ι T)

Next tactic:
suffices ⋂₀ ι T ∈ C2 by exact claim6 _ this
private theorem cl_cl {X : Compactum} (A : Set X) : cl (cl A) ⊆ cl A := by
  rintro _ ⟨F, hF, rfl⟩
  -- Notation to be used in this proof.
  let fsu := Finset (Set (Ultrafilter X))
  let ssu := Set (Set (Ultrafilter X))
  let ι : fsu → ssu := fun x ↦ ↑x
  let C0 : ssu := { Z | ∃ B ∈ F, X.str ⁻¹' B = Z }
  let AA := { G : Ultrafilter X | A ∈ G }
  let C1 := insert AA C0
  let C2 := finiteInterClosure C1
  -- C0 is closed under intersections.
  have claim1 : ∀ (B) (_ : B ∈ C0) (C) (_ : C ∈ C0), B ∩ C ∈ C0 := by
    rintro B ⟨Q, hQ, rfl⟩ C ⟨R, hR, rfl⟩
    use Q ∩ R
    simp only [and_true_iff, eq_self_iff_true, Set.preimage_inter]
    exact inter_sets _ hQ hR
  -- All sets in C0 are nonempty.
  have claim2 : ∀ B ∈ C0, Set.Nonempty B := by
    rintro B ⟨Q, hQ, rfl⟩
    obtain ⟨q⟩ := Filter.nonempty_of_mem hQ
    use X.incl q
    simpa
  -- The intersection of AA with every set in C0 is nonempty.
  have claim3 : ∀ B ∈ C0, (AA ∩ B).Nonempty := by
    rintro B ⟨Q, hQ, rfl⟩
    have : (Q ∩ cl A).Nonempty := Filter.nonempty_of_mem (inter_mem hQ hF)
    rcases this with ⟨q, hq1, P, hq2, hq3⟩
    refine' ⟨P, hq2, _⟩
    rw [← hq3] at hq1
    simpa
  -- Suffices to show that the intersection of any finite subcollection of C1 is nonempty.
  suffices ∀ T : fsu, ι T ⊆ C1 → (⋂₀ ι T).Nonempty by
    obtain ⟨G, h1⟩ := exists_ultrafilter_of_finite_inter_nonempty _ this
    use X.join G
    have : G.map X.str = F := Ultrafilter.coe_le_coe.1 fun S hS => h1 (Or.inr ⟨S, hS, rfl⟩)
    rw [join_distrib, this]
    exact ⟨h1 (Or.inl rfl), rfl⟩
  -- C2 is closed under finite intersections (by construction!).
  have claim4 := finiteInterClosure_finiteInter C1
  -- C0 is closed under finite intersections by claim1.
  have claim5 : FiniteInter C0 := ⟨⟨_, univ_mem, Set.preimage_univ⟩, claim1⟩
  -- Every element of C2 is nonempty.
  have claim6 : ∀ P ∈ C2, (P : Set (Ultrafilter X)).Nonempty := by
    suffices ∀ P ∈ C2, P ∈ C0 ∨ ∃ Q ∈ C0, P = AA ∩ Q by
      intro P hP
      cases' this P hP with h h
      · exact claim2 _ h
      · rcases h with ⟨Q, hQ, rfl⟩
        exact claim3 _ hQ
    intro P hP
    exact claim5.finiteInterClosure_insert _ hP
  intro T hT
  -- Suffices to show that the intersection of the T's is contained in C2.
  suffices ⋂₀ ι T ∈ C2 by 

Proof state:
X : Compactum
A : Set X.A
F : Ultrafilter X.A
hF : F ∈ Compactum.basic (Compactum.cl A)
fsu : Type u_1 := Finset (Set (Ultrafilter X.A))
ssu : Type u_1 := Set (Set (Ultrafilter X.A))
ι : fsu → ssu := fun x => ↑x
C0 : ssu := {Z | ∃ B ∈ F, str X ⁻¹' B = Z}
AA : Set (Ultrafilter X.A) := {G | A ∈ G}
C1 : ssu := insert AA C0
C2 : Set (Set (Ultrafilter X.A)) := finiteInterClosure C1
claim1 : ∀ B ∈ C0, ∀ C ∈ C0, B ∩ C ∈ C0
claim2 : ∀ B ∈ C0, Set.Nonempty B
claim3 : ∀ B ∈ C0, Set.Nonempty (AA ∩ B)
claim4 : FiniteInter (finiteInterClosure C1)
claim5 : FiniteInter C0
claim6 : ∀ P ∈ C2, Set.Nonempty P
T : fsu
hT : ι T ⊆ C1
this : ⋂₀ ι T ∈ C2
⊢ Set.Nonempty (⋂₀ ι T)

Next tactic:
exact claim6 _ this
private theorem cl_cl {X : Compactum} (A : Set X) : cl (cl A) ⊆ cl A := by
  rintro _ ⟨F, hF, rfl⟩
  -- Notation to be used in this proof.
  let fsu := Finset (Set (Ultrafilter X))
  let ssu := Set (Set (Ultrafilter X))
  let ι : fsu → ssu := fun x ↦ ↑x
  let C0 : ssu := { Z | ∃ B ∈ F, X.str ⁻¹' B = Z }
  let AA := { G : Ultrafilter X | A ∈ G }
  let C1 := insert AA C0
  let C2 := finiteInterClosure C1
  -- C0 is closed under intersections.
  have claim1 : ∀ (B) (_ : B ∈ C0) (C) (_ : C ∈ C0), B ∩ C ∈ C0 := by
    rintro B ⟨Q, hQ, rfl⟩ C ⟨R, hR, rfl⟩
    use Q ∩ R
    simp only [and_true_iff, eq_self_iff_true, Set.preimage_inter]
    exact inter_sets _ hQ hR
  -- All sets in C0 are nonempty.
  have claim2 : ∀ B ∈ C0, Set.Nonempty B := by
    rintro B ⟨Q, hQ, rfl⟩
    obtain ⟨q⟩ := Filter.nonempty_of_mem hQ
    use X.incl q
    simpa
  -- The intersection of AA with every set in C0 is nonempty.
  have claim3 : ∀ B ∈ C0, (AA ∩ B).Nonempty := by
    rintro B ⟨Q, hQ, rfl⟩
    have : (Q ∩ cl A).Nonempty := Filter.nonempty_of_mem (inter_mem hQ hF)
    rcases this with ⟨q, hq1, P, hq2, hq3⟩
    refine' ⟨P, hq2, _⟩
    rw [← hq3] at hq1
    simpa
  -- Suffices to show that the intersection of any finite subcollection of C1 is nonempty.
  suffices ∀ T : fsu, ι T ⊆ C1 → (⋂₀ ι T).Nonempty by
    obtain ⟨G, h1⟩ := exists_ultrafilter_of_finite_inter_nonempty _ this
    use X.join G
    have : G.map X.str = F := Ultrafilter.coe_le_coe.1 fun S hS => h1 (Or.inr ⟨S, hS, rfl⟩)
    rw [join_distrib, this]
    exact ⟨h1 (Or.inl rfl), rfl⟩
  -- C2 is closed under finite intersections (by construction!).
  have claim4 := finiteInterClosure_finiteInter C1
  -- C0 is closed under finite intersections by claim1.
  have claim5 : FiniteInter C0 := ⟨⟨_, univ_mem, Set.preimage_univ⟩, claim1⟩
  -- Every element of C2 is nonempty.
  have claim6 : ∀ P ∈ C2, (P : Set (Ultrafilter X)).Nonempty := by
    suffices ∀ P ∈ C2, P ∈ C0 ∨ ∃ Q ∈ C0, P = AA ∩ Q by
      intro P hP
      cases' this P hP with h h
      · exact claim2 _ h
      · rcases h with ⟨Q, hQ, rfl⟩
        exact claim3 _ hQ
    intro P hP
    exact claim5.finiteInterClosure_insert _ hP
  intro T hT
  -- Suffices to show that the intersection of the T's is contained in C2.
  suffices ⋂₀ ι T ∈ C2 by exact claim6 _ this
  -- Finish
  

Proof state:
case intro.intro
X : Compactum
A : Set X.A
F : Ultrafilter X.A
hF : F ∈ Compactum.basic (Compactum.cl A)
fsu : Type u_1 := Finset (Set (Ultrafilter X.A))
ssu : Type u_1 := Set (Set (Ultrafilter X.A))
ι : fsu → ssu := fun x => ↑x
C0 : ssu := {Z | ∃ B ∈ F, str X ⁻¹' B = Z}
AA : Set (Ultrafilter X.A) := {G | A ∈ G}
C1 : ssu := insert AA C0
C2 : Set (Set (Ultrafilter X.A)) := finiteInterClosure C1
claim1 : ∀ B ∈ C0, ∀ C ∈ C0, B ∩ C ∈ C0
claim2 : ∀ B ∈ C0, Set.Nonempty B
claim3 : ∀ B ∈ C0, Set.Nonempty (AA ∩ B)
claim4 : FiniteInter (finiteInterClosure C1)
claim5 : FiniteInter C0
claim6 : ∀ P ∈ C2, Set.Nonempty P
T : fsu
hT : ι T ⊆ C1
⊢ ⋂₀ ι T ∈ C2

Next tactic:
apply claim4.finiteInter_mem T
private theorem cl_cl {X : Compactum} (A : Set X) : cl (cl A) ⊆ cl A := by
  rintro _ ⟨F, hF, rfl⟩
  -- Notation to be used in this proof.
  let fsu := Finset (Set (Ultrafilter X))
  let ssu := Set (Set (Ultrafilter X))
  let ι : fsu → ssu := fun x ↦ ↑x
  let C0 : ssu := { Z | ∃ B ∈ F, X.str ⁻¹' B = Z }
  let AA := { G : Ultrafilter X | A ∈ G }
  let C1 := insert AA C0
  let C2 := finiteInterClosure C1
  -- C0 is closed under intersections.
  have claim1 : ∀ (B) (_ : B ∈ C0) (C) (_ : C ∈ C0), B ∩ C ∈ C0 := by
    rintro B ⟨Q, hQ, rfl⟩ C ⟨R, hR, rfl⟩
    use Q ∩ R
    simp only [and_true_iff, eq_self_iff_true, Set.preimage_inter]
    exact inter_sets _ hQ hR
  -- All sets in C0 are nonempty.
  have claim2 : ∀ B ∈ C0, Set.Nonempty B := by
    rintro B ⟨Q, hQ, rfl⟩
    obtain ⟨q⟩ := Filter.nonempty_of_mem hQ
    use X.incl q
    simpa
  -- The intersection of AA with every set in C0 is nonempty.
  have claim3 : ∀ B ∈ C0, (AA ∩ B).Nonempty := by
    rintro B ⟨Q, hQ, rfl⟩
    have : (Q ∩ cl A).Nonempty := Filter.nonempty_of_mem (inter_mem hQ hF)
    rcases this with ⟨q, hq1, P, hq2, hq3⟩
    refine' ⟨P, hq2, _⟩
    rw [← hq3] at hq1
    simpa
  -- Suffices to show that the intersection of any finite subcollection of C1 is nonempty.
  suffices ∀ T : fsu, ι T ⊆ C1 → (⋂₀ ι T).Nonempty by
    obtain ⟨G, h1⟩ := exists_ultrafilter_of_finite_inter_nonempty _ this
    use X.join G
    have : G.map X.str = F := Ultrafilter.coe_le_coe.1 fun S hS => h1 (Or.inr ⟨S, hS, rfl⟩)
    rw [join_distrib, this]
    exact ⟨h1 (Or.inl rfl), rfl⟩
  -- C2 is closed under finite intersections (by construction!).
  have claim4 := finiteInterClosure_finiteInter C1
  -- C0 is closed under finite intersections by claim1.
  have claim5 : FiniteInter C0 := ⟨⟨_, univ_mem, Set.preimage_univ⟩, claim1⟩
  -- Every element of C2 is nonempty.
  have claim6 : ∀ P ∈ C2, (P : Set (Ultrafilter X)).Nonempty := by
    suffices ∀ P ∈ C2, P ∈ C0 ∨ ∃ Q ∈ C0, P = AA ∩ Q by
      intro P hP
      cases' this P hP with h h
      · exact claim2 _ h
      · rcases h with ⟨Q, hQ, rfl⟩
        exact claim3 _ hQ
    intro P hP
    exact claim5.finiteInterClosure_insert _ hP
  intro T hT
  -- Suffices to show that the intersection of the T's is contained in C2.
  suffices ⋂₀ ι T ∈ C2 by exact claim6 _ this
  -- Finish
  apply claim4.finiteInter_mem T
  

Proof state:
case intro.intro
X : Compactum
A : Set X.A
F : Ultrafilter X.A
hF : F ∈ Compactum.basic (Compactum.cl A)
fsu : Type u_1 := Finset (Set (Ultrafilter X.A))
ssu : Type u_1 := Set (Set (Ultrafilter X.A))
ι : fsu → ssu := fun x => ↑x
C0 : ssu := {Z | ∃ B ∈ F, str X ⁻¹' B = Z}
AA : Set (Ultrafilter X.A) := {G | A ∈ G}
C1 : ssu := insert AA C0
C2 : Set (Set (Ultrafilter X.A)) := finiteInterClosure C1
claim1 : ∀ B ∈ C0, ∀ C ∈ C0, B ∩ C ∈ C0
claim2 : ∀ B ∈ C0, Set.Nonempty B
claim3 : ∀ B ∈ C0, Set.Nonempty (AA ∩ B)
claim4 : FiniteInter (finiteInterClosure C1)
claim5 : FiniteInter C0
claim6 : ∀ P ∈ C2, Set.Nonempty P
T : fsu
hT : ι T ⊆ C1
⊢ ↑T ⊆ finiteInterClosure C1

Next tactic:
intro t ht
private theorem cl_cl {X : Compactum} (A : Set X) : cl (cl A) ⊆ cl A := by
  rintro _ ⟨F, hF, rfl⟩
  -- Notation to be used in this proof.
  let fsu := Finset (Set (Ultrafilter X))
  let ssu := Set (Set (Ultrafilter X))
  let ι : fsu → ssu := fun x ↦ ↑x
  let C0 : ssu := { Z | ∃ B ∈ F, X.str ⁻¹' B = Z }
  let AA := { G : Ultrafilter X | A ∈ G }
  let C1 := insert AA C0
  let C2 := finiteInterClosure C1
  -- C0 is closed under intersections.
  have claim1 : ∀ (B) (_ : B ∈ C0) (C) (_ : C ∈ C0), B ∩ C ∈ C0 := by
    rintro B ⟨Q, hQ, rfl⟩ C ⟨R, hR, rfl⟩
    use Q ∩ R
    simp only [and_true_iff, eq_self_iff_true, Set.preimage_inter]
    exact inter_sets _ hQ hR
  -- All sets in C0 are nonempty.
  have claim2 : ∀ B ∈ C0, Set.Nonempty B := by
    rintro B ⟨Q, hQ, rfl⟩
    obtain ⟨q⟩ := Filter.nonempty_of_mem hQ
    use X.incl q
    simpa
  -- The intersection of AA with every set in C0 is nonempty.
  have claim3 : ∀ B ∈ C0, (AA ∩ B).Nonempty := by
    rintro B ⟨Q, hQ, rfl⟩
    have : (Q ∩ cl A).Nonempty := Filter.nonempty_of_mem (inter_mem hQ hF)
    rcases this with ⟨q, hq1, P, hq2, hq3⟩
    refine' ⟨P, hq2, _⟩
    rw [← hq3] at hq1
    simpa
  -- Suffices to show that the intersection of any finite subcollection of C1 is nonempty.
  suffices ∀ T : fsu, ι T ⊆ C1 → (⋂₀ ι T).Nonempty by
    obtain ⟨G, h1⟩ := exists_ultrafilter_of_finite_inter_nonempty _ this
    use X.join G
    have : G.map X.str = F := Ultrafilter.coe_le_coe.1 fun S hS => h1 (Or.inr ⟨S, hS, rfl⟩)
    rw [join_distrib, this]
    exact ⟨h1 (Or.inl rfl), rfl⟩
  -- C2 is closed under finite intersections (by construction!).
  have claim4 := finiteInterClosure_finiteInter C1
  -- C0 is closed under finite intersections by claim1.
  have claim5 : FiniteInter C0 := ⟨⟨_, univ_mem, Set.preimage_univ⟩, claim1⟩
  -- Every element of C2 is nonempty.
  have claim6 : ∀ P ∈ C2, (P : Set (Ultrafilter X)).Nonempty := by
    suffices ∀ P ∈ C2, P ∈ C0 ∨ ∃ Q ∈ C0, P = AA ∩ Q by
      intro P hP
      cases' this P hP with h h
      · exact claim2 _ h
      · rcases h with ⟨Q, hQ, rfl⟩
        exact claim3 _ hQ
    intro P hP
    exact claim5.finiteInterClosure_insert _ hP
  intro T hT
  -- Suffices to show that the intersection of the T's is contained in C2.
  suffices ⋂₀ ι T ∈ C2 by exact claim6 _ this
  -- Finish
  apply claim4.finiteInter_mem T
  intro t ht
  

Proof state:
case intro.intro
X : Compactum
A : Set X.A
F : Ultrafilter X.A
hF : F ∈ Compactum.basic (Compactum.cl A)
fsu : Type u_1 := Finset (Set (Ultrafilter X.A))
ssu : Type u_1 := Set (Set (Ultrafilter X.A))
ι : fsu → ssu := fun x => ↑x
C0 : ssu := {Z | ∃ B ∈ F, str X ⁻¹' B = Z}
AA : Set (Ultrafilter X.A) := {G | A ∈ G}
C1 : ssu := insert AA C0
C2 : Set (Set (Ultrafilter X.A)) := finiteInterClosure C1
claim1 : ∀ B ∈ C0, ∀ C ∈ C0, B ∩ C ∈ C0
claim2 : ∀ B ∈ C0, Set.Nonempty B
claim3 : ∀ B ∈ C0, Set.Nonempty (AA ∩ B)
claim4 : FiniteInter (finiteInterClosure C1)
claim5 : FiniteInter C0
claim6 : ∀ P ∈ C2, Set.Nonempty P
T : fsu
hT : ι T ⊆ C1
t : Set (Ultrafilter X.A)
ht : t ∈ ↑T
⊢ t ∈ finiteInterClosure C1

Next tactic:
refine' finiteInterClosure.basic (@hT t ht)
theorem isClosed_cl {X : Compactum} (A : Set X) : IsClosed (cl A) := by
  

Proof state:
X : Compactum
A : Set X.A
⊢ IsClosed (Compactum.cl A)

Next tactic:
rw [isClosed_iff]
theorem isClosed_cl {X : Compactum} (A : Set X) : IsClosed (cl A) := by
  rw [isClosed_iff]
  

Proof state:
X : Compactum
A : Set X.A
⊢ ∀ (F : Ultrafilter X.A), Compactum.cl A ∈ F → str X F ∈ Compactum.cl A

Next tactic:
intro F hF
theorem isClosed_cl {X : Compactum} (A : Set X) : IsClosed (cl A) := by
  rw [isClosed_iff]
  intro F hF
  

Proof state:
X : Compactum
A : Set X.A
F : Ultrafilter X.A
hF : Compactum.cl A ∈ F
⊢ str X F ∈ Compactum.cl A

Next tactic:
exact cl_cl _ ⟨F, hF, rfl⟩
theorem str_eq_of_le_nhds {X : Compactum} (F : Ultrafilter X) (x : X) : ↑F ≤ 𝓝 x → X.str F = x := by
  -- Notation to be used in this proof.
  

Proof state:
X : Compactum
F : Ultrafilter X.A
x : X.A
⊢ ↑F ≤ 𝓝 x → str X F = x

Next tactic:
let fsu := Finset (Set (Ultrafilter X))