l3lab/ntp-mathlib huggingface dataset:
@[simp]
theorem mem_finsetApprox {x : R} :
    x ∈ finsetApprox bS adm ↔ ∃ i j, i ≠ j ∧ distinctElems bS adm i - distinctElems bS adm j =
    x := by
  simp only [finsetApprox, Finset.mem_erase, Finset.mem_image]
  constructor
  · rintro ⟨hx, ⟨i, j⟩, _, rfl⟩
    refine' ⟨i, j, _, rfl⟩
    rintro rfl
    

Proof state:
case mp.intro.intro.mk.intro
R : Type u_1
S : Type u_2
K : Type u_3
L : Type u_4
inst✝¹⁶ : EuclideanDomain R
inst✝¹⁵ : CommRing S
inst✝¹⁴ : IsDomain S
inst✝¹³ : Field K
inst✝¹² : Field L
inst✝¹¹ : Algebra R K
inst✝¹⁰ : IsFractionRing R K
inst✝⁹ : Algebra K L
inst✝⁸ : FiniteDimensional K L
inst✝⁷ : IsSeparable K L
algRL : Algebra R L
inst✝⁶ : IsScalarTower R K L
inst✝⁵ : Algebra R S
inst✝⁴ : Algebra S L
ist : IsScalarTower R S L
iic : IsIntegralClosure S R L
abv : AbsoluteValue R ℤ
ι : Type u_5
inst✝³ : DecidableEq ι
inst✝² : Fintype ι
bS : Basis ι R S
adm : AbsoluteValue.IsAdmissible abv
inst✝¹ : Infinite R
inst✝ : DecidableEq R
i : Fin (Nat.succ (cardM bS adm))
left✝ : (i, i) ∈ Finset.univ
hx : (distinctElems bS adm) (i, i).1 - (distinctElems bS adm) (i, i).2 ≠ 0
⊢ False

Next tactic:
simp at hx
@[simp]
theorem mem_finsetApprox {x : R} :
    x ∈ finsetApprox bS adm ↔ ∃ i j, i ≠ j ∧ distinctElems bS adm i - distinctElems bS adm j =
    x := by
  simp only [finsetApprox, Finset.mem_erase, Finset.mem_image]
  constructor
  · rintro ⟨hx, ⟨i, j⟩, _, rfl⟩
    refine' ⟨i, j, _, rfl⟩
    rintro rfl
    simp at hx
  · 

Proof state:
case mpr
R : Type u_1
S : Type u_2
K : Type u_3
L : Type u_4
inst✝¹⁶ : EuclideanDomain R
inst✝¹⁵ : CommRing S
inst✝¹⁴ : IsDomain S
inst✝¹³ : Field K
inst✝¹² : Field L
inst✝¹¹ : Algebra R K
inst✝¹⁰ : IsFractionRing R K
inst✝⁹ : Algebra K L
inst✝⁸ : FiniteDimensional K L
inst✝⁷ : IsSeparable K L
algRL : Algebra R L
inst✝⁶ : IsScalarTower R K L
inst✝⁵ : Algebra R S
inst✝⁴ : Algebra S L
ist : IsScalarTower R S L
iic : IsIntegralClosure S R L
abv : AbsoluteValue R ℤ
ι : Type u_5
inst✝³ : DecidableEq ι
inst✝² : Fintype ι
bS : Basis ι R S
adm : AbsoluteValue.IsAdmissible abv
inst✝¹ : Infinite R
inst✝ : DecidableEq R
x : R
⊢ (∃ i j, i ≠ j ∧ (distinctElems bS adm) i - (distinctElems bS adm) j = x) →
    x ≠ 0 ∧ ∃ a ∈ Finset.univ, (distinctElems bS adm) a.1 - (distinctElems bS adm) a.2 = x

Next tactic:
rintro ⟨i, j, hij, rfl⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_finsetApprox {x : R} :
    x ∈ finsetApprox bS adm ↔ ∃ i j, i ≠ j ∧ distinctElems bS adm i - distinctElems bS adm j =
    x := by
  simp only [finsetApprox, Finset.mem_erase, Finset.mem_image]
  constructor
  · rintro ⟨hx, ⟨i, j⟩, _, rfl⟩
    refine' ⟨i, j, _, rfl⟩
    rintro rfl
    simp at hx
  · rintro ⟨i, j, hij, rfl⟩
    

Proof state:
case mpr.intro.intro.intro
R : Type u_1
S : Type u_2
K : Type u_3
L : Type u_4
inst✝¹⁶ : EuclideanDomain R
inst✝¹⁵ : CommRing S
inst✝¹⁴ : IsDomain S
inst✝¹³ : Field K
inst✝¹² : Field L
inst✝¹¹ : Algebra R K
inst✝¹⁰ : IsFractionRing R K
inst✝⁹ : Algebra K L
inst✝⁸ : FiniteDimensional K L
inst✝⁷ : IsSeparable K L
algRL : Algebra R L
inst✝⁶ : IsScalarTower R K L
inst✝⁵ : Algebra R S
inst✝⁴ : Algebra S L
ist : IsScalarTower R S L
iic : IsIntegralClosure S R L
abv : AbsoluteValue R ℤ
ι : Type u_5
inst✝³ : DecidableEq ι
inst✝² : Fintype ι
bS : Basis ι R S
adm : AbsoluteValue.IsAdmissible abv
inst✝¹ : Infinite R
inst✝ : DecidableEq R
i j : Fin (Nat.succ (cardM bS adm))
hij : i ≠ j
⊢ (distinctElems bS adm) i - (distinctElems bS adm) j ≠ 0 ∧
    ∃ a ∈ Finset.univ,
      (distinctElems bS adm) a.1 - (distinctElems bS adm) a.2 = (distinctElems bS adm) i - (distinctElems bS adm) j

Next tactic:
refine' ⟨_, ⟨i, j⟩, Finset.mem_univ _, rfl⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_finsetApprox {x : R} :
    x ∈ finsetApprox bS adm ↔ ∃ i j, i ≠ j ∧ distinctElems bS adm i - distinctElems bS adm j =
    x := by
  simp only [finsetApprox, Finset.mem_erase, Finset.mem_image]
  constructor
  · rintro ⟨hx, ⟨i, j⟩, _, rfl⟩
    refine' ⟨i, j, _, rfl⟩
    rintro rfl
    simp at hx
  · rintro ⟨i, j, hij, rfl⟩
    refine' ⟨_, ⟨i, j⟩, Finset.mem_univ _, rfl⟩
    

Proof state:
case mpr.intro.intro.intro
R : Type u_1
S : Type u_2
K : Type u_3
L : Type u_4
inst✝¹⁶ : EuclideanDomain R
inst✝¹⁵ : CommRing S
inst✝¹⁴ : IsDomain S
inst✝¹³ : Field K
inst✝¹² : Field L
inst✝¹¹ : Algebra R K
inst✝¹⁰ : IsFractionRing R K
inst✝⁹ : Algebra K L
inst✝⁸ : FiniteDimensional K L
inst✝⁷ : IsSeparable K L
algRL : Algebra R L
inst✝⁶ : IsScalarTower R K L
inst✝⁵ : Algebra R S
inst✝⁴ : Algebra S L
ist : IsScalarTower R S L
iic : IsIntegralClosure S R L
abv : AbsoluteValue R ℤ
ι : Type u_5
inst✝³ : DecidableEq ι
inst✝² : Fintype ι
bS : Basis ι R S
adm : AbsoluteValue.IsAdmissible abv
inst✝¹ : Infinite R
inst✝ : DecidableEq R
i j : Fin (Nat.succ (cardM bS adm))
hij : i ≠ j
⊢ (distinctElems bS adm) i - (distinctElems bS adm) j ≠ 0

Next tactic:
rw [Ne.def, sub_eq_zero]
@[simp]
theorem mem_finsetApprox {x : R} :
    x ∈ finsetApprox bS adm ↔ ∃ i j, i ≠ j ∧ distinctElems bS adm i - distinctElems bS adm j =
    x := by
  simp only [finsetApprox, Finset.mem_erase, Finset.mem_image]
  constructor
  · rintro ⟨hx, ⟨i, j⟩, _, rfl⟩
    refine' ⟨i, j, _, rfl⟩
    rintro rfl
    simp at hx
  · rintro ⟨i, j, hij, rfl⟩
    refine' ⟨_, ⟨i, j⟩, Finset.mem_univ _, rfl⟩
    rw [Ne.def, sub_eq_zero]
    

Proof state:
case mpr.intro.intro.intro
R : Type u_1
S : Type u_2
K : Type u_3
L : Type u_4
inst✝¹⁶ : EuclideanDomain R
inst✝¹⁵ : CommRing S
inst✝¹⁴ : IsDomain S
inst✝¹³ : Field K
inst✝¹² : Field L
inst✝¹¹ : Algebra R K
inst✝¹⁰ : IsFractionRing R K
inst✝⁹ : Algebra K L
inst✝⁸ : FiniteDimensional K L
inst✝⁷ : IsSeparable K L
algRL : Algebra R L
inst✝⁶ : IsScalarTower R K L
inst✝⁵ : Algebra R S
inst✝⁴ : Algebra S L
ist : IsScalarTower R S L
iic : IsIntegralClosure S R L
abv : AbsoluteValue R ℤ
ι : Type u_5
inst✝³ : DecidableEq ι
inst✝² : Fintype ι
bS : Basis ι R S
adm : AbsoluteValue.IsAdmissible abv
inst✝¹ : Infinite R
inst✝ : DecidableEq R
i j : Fin (Nat.succ (cardM bS adm))
hij : i ≠ j
⊢ ¬(distinctElems bS adm) i = (distinctElems bS adm) j

Next tactic:
exact fun h => hij ((distinctElems bS adm).injective h)
/-- We can approximate `a / b : L` with `q / r`, where `r` has finitely many options for `L`. -/
theorem exists_mem_finsetApprox (a : S) {b} (hb : b ≠ (0 : R)) :
    ∃ q : S,
      ∃ r ∈ finsetApprox bS adm, abv (Algebra.norm R (r • a - b • q)) <
      abv (Algebra.norm R (algebraMap R S b)) := by
  

Proof state:
R : Type u_1
S : Type u_2
K : Type u_3
L : Type u_4
inst✝¹⁶ : EuclideanDomain R
inst✝¹⁵ : CommRing S
inst✝¹⁴ : IsDomain S
inst✝¹³ : Field K
inst✝¹² : Field L
inst✝¹¹ : Algebra R K
inst✝¹⁰ : IsFractionRing R K
inst✝⁹ : Algebra K L
inst✝⁸ : FiniteDimensional K L
inst✝⁷ : IsSeparable K L
algRL : Algebra R L
inst✝⁶ : IsScalarTower R K L
inst✝⁵ : Algebra R S
inst✝⁴ : Algebra S L
ist : IsScalarTower R S L
iic : IsIntegralClosure S R L
abv : AbsoluteValue R ℤ
ι : Type u_5
inst✝³ : DecidableEq ι
inst✝² : Fintype ι
bS : Basis ι R S
adm : AbsoluteValue.IsAdmissible abv
inst✝¹ : Infinite R
inst✝ : DecidableEq R
a : S
b : R
hb : b ≠ 0
⊢ ∃ q, ∃ r ∈ finsetApprox bS adm, abv ((Algebra.norm R) (r • a - b • q)) < abv ((Algebra.norm R) ((algebraMap R S) b))

Next tactic:
have dim_pos := Fintype.card_pos_iff.mpr bS.index_nonempty
/-- We can approximate `a / b : L` with `q / r`, where `r` has finitely many options for `L`. -/
theorem exists_mem_finsetApprox (a : S) {b} (hb : b ≠ (0 : R)) :
    ∃ q : S,
      ∃ r ∈ finsetApprox bS adm, abv (Algebra.norm R (r • a - b • q)) <
      abv (Algebra.norm R (algebraMap R S b)) := by
  have dim_pos := Fintype.card_pos_iff.mpr bS.index_nonempty
  

Proof state:
R : Type u_1
S : Type u_2
K : Type u_3
L : Type u_4
inst✝¹⁶ : EuclideanDomain R
inst✝¹⁵ : CommRing S
inst✝¹⁴ : IsDomain S
inst✝¹³ : Field K
inst✝¹² : Field L
inst✝¹¹ : Algebra R K
inst✝¹⁰ : IsFractionRing R K
inst✝⁹ : Algebra K L
inst✝⁸ : FiniteDimensional K L
inst✝⁷ : IsSeparable K L
algRL : Algebra R L
inst✝⁶ : IsScalarTower R K L
inst✝⁵ : Algebra R S
inst✝⁴ : Algebra S L
ist : IsScalarTower R S L
iic : IsIntegralClosure S R L
abv : AbsoluteValue R ℤ
ι : Type u_5
inst✝³ : DecidableEq ι
inst✝² : Fintype ι
bS : Basis ι R S
adm : AbsoluteValue.IsAdmissible abv
inst✝¹ : Infinite R
inst✝ : DecidableEq R
a : S
b : R
hb : b ≠ 0
dim_pos : 0 < Fintype.card ι
⊢ ∃ q, ∃ r ∈ finsetApprox bS adm, abv ((Algebra.norm R) (r • a - b • q)) < abv ((Algebra.norm R) ((algebraMap R S) b))

Next tactic:
set ε : ℝ := normBound abv bS ^ (-1 / Fintype.card ι : ℝ) with ε_eq
/-- We can approximate `a / b : L` with `q / r`, where `r` has finitely many options for `L`. -/
theorem exists_mem_finsetApprox (a : S) {b} (hb : b ≠ (0 : R)) :
    ∃ q : S,
      ∃ r ∈ finsetApprox bS adm, abv (Algebra.norm R (r • a - b • q)) <
      abv (Algebra.norm R (algebraMap R S b)) := by
  have dim_pos := Fintype.card_pos_iff.mpr bS.index_nonempty
  set ε : ℝ := normBound abv bS ^ (-1 / Fintype.card ι : ℝ) with ε_eq
  

Proof state:
R : Type u_1
S : Type u_2
K : Type u_3
L : Type u_4
inst✝¹⁶ : EuclideanDomain R
inst✝¹⁵ : CommRing S
inst✝¹⁴ : IsDomain S
inst✝¹³ : Field K
inst✝¹² : Field L
inst✝¹¹ : Algebra R K
inst✝¹⁰ : IsFractionRing R K
inst✝⁹ : Algebra K L
inst✝⁸ : FiniteDimensional K L
inst✝⁷ : IsSeparable K L
algRL : Algebra R L
inst✝⁶ : IsScalarTower R K L
inst✝⁵ : Algebra R S
inst✝⁴ : Algebra S L
ist : IsScalarTower R S L
iic : IsIntegralClosure S R L
abv : AbsoluteValue R ℤ
ι : Type u_5
inst✝³ : DecidableEq ι
inst✝² : Fintype ι
bS : Basis ι R S
adm : AbsoluteValue.IsAdmissible abv
inst✝¹ : Infinite R
inst✝ : DecidableEq R
a : S
b : R
hb : b ≠ 0
dim_pos : 0 < Fintype.card ι
ε : ℝ := ↑(normBound abv bS) ^ (-1 / ↑(Fintype.card ι))
ε_eq : ε = ↑(normBound abv bS) ^ (-1 / ↑(Fintype.card ι))
⊢ ∃ q, ∃ r ∈ finsetApprox bS adm, abv ((Algebra.norm R) (r • a - b • q)) < abv ((Algebra.norm R) ((algebraMap R S) b))

Next tactic:
have hε : 0 < ε := Real.rpow_pos_of_pos (Int.cast_pos.mpr (normBound_pos abv bS)) _
/-- We can approximate `a / b : L` with `q / r`, where `r` has finitely many options for `L`. -/
theorem exists_mem_finsetApprox (a : S) {b} (hb : b ≠ (0 : R)) :
    ∃ q : S,
      ∃ r ∈ finsetApprox bS adm, abv (Algebra.norm R (r • a - b • q)) <
      abv (Algebra.norm R (algebraMap R S b)) := by
  have dim_pos := Fintype.card_pos_iff.mpr bS.index_nonempty
  set ε : ℝ := normBound abv bS ^ (-1 / Fintype.card ι : ℝ) with ε_eq
  have hε : 0 < ε := Real.rpow_pos_of_pos (Int.cast_pos.mpr (normBound_pos abv bS)) _
  

Proof state:
R : Type u_1
S : Type u_2
K : Type u_3
L : Type u_4
inst✝¹⁶ : EuclideanDomain R
inst✝¹⁵ : CommRing S
inst✝¹⁴ : IsDomain S
inst✝¹³ : Field K
inst✝¹² : Field L
inst✝¹¹ : Algebra R K
inst✝¹⁰ : IsFractionRing R K
inst✝⁹ : Algebra K L
inst✝⁸ : FiniteDimensional K L
inst✝⁷ : IsSeparable K L
algRL : Algebra R L
inst✝⁶ : IsScalarTower R K L
inst✝⁵ : Algebra R S
inst✝⁴ : Algebra S L
ist : IsScalarTower R S L
iic : IsIntegralClosure S R L
abv : AbsoluteValue R ℤ
ι : Type u_5
inst✝³ : DecidableEq ι
inst✝² : Fintype ι
bS : Basis ι R S
adm : AbsoluteValue.IsAdmissible abv
inst✝¹ : Infinite R
inst✝ : DecidableEq R
a : S
b : R
hb : b ≠ 0
dim_pos : 0 < Fintype.card ι
ε : ℝ := ↑(normBound abv bS) ^ (-1 / ↑(Fintype.card ι))
ε_eq : ε = ↑(normBound abv bS) ^ (-1 / ↑(Fintype.card ι))
hε : 0 < ε
⊢ ∃ q, ∃ r ∈ finsetApprox bS adm, abv ((Algebra.norm R) (r • a - b • q)) < abv ((Algebra.norm R) ((algebraMap R S) b))

Next tactic:
have ε_le : (normBound abv bS : ℝ) * (abv b • ε) ^ (Fintype.card ι : ℝ)
                ≤ abv b ^ (Fintype.card ι : ℝ) := by
    have := normBound_pos abv bS
    have := abv.nonneg b
    rw [ε_eq, Algebra.smul_def, eq_intCast, mul_rpow, ← rpow_mul, div_mul_cancel, rpow_neg_one,
      mul_left_comm, mul_inv_cancel, mul_one, rpow_nat_cast] <;>
      try norm_cast; linarith
    · exact Iff.mpr Int.cast_nonneg this
    · linarith
/-- We can approximate `a / b : L` with `q / r`, where `r` has finitely many options for `L`. -/
theorem exists_mem_finsetApprox (a : S) {b} (hb : b ≠ (0 : R)) :
    ∃ q : S,
      ∃ r ∈ finsetApprox bS adm, abv (Algebra.norm R (r • a - b • q)) <
      abv (Algebra.norm R (algebraMap R S b)) := by
  have dim_pos := Fintype.card_pos_iff.mpr bS.index_nonempty
  set ε : ℝ := normBound abv bS ^ (-1 / Fintype.card ι : ℝ) with ε_eq
  have hε : 0 < ε := Real.rpow_pos_of_pos (Int.cast_pos.mpr (normBound_pos abv bS)) _
  have ε_le : (normBound abv bS : ℝ) * (abv b • ε) ^ (Fintype.card ι : ℝ)
                ≤ abv b ^ (Fintype.card ι : ℝ) := by
    

Proof state:
R : Type u_1
S : Type u_2
K : Type u_3
L : Type u_4
inst✝¹⁶ : EuclideanDomain R
inst✝¹⁵ : CommRing S
inst✝¹⁴ : IsDomain S
inst✝¹³ : Field K
inst✝¹² : Field L
inst✝¹¹ : Algebra R K
inst✝¹⁰ : IsFractionRing R K
inst✝⁹ : Algebra K L
inst✝⁸ : FiniteDimensional K L
inst✝⁷ : IsSeparable K L
algRL : Algebra R L
inst✝⁶ : IsScalarTower R K L
inst✝⁵ : Algebra R S
inst✝⁴ : Algebra S L
ist : IsScalarTower R S L
iic : IsIntegralClosure S R L
abv : AbsoluteValue R ℤ
ι : Type u_5
inst✝³ : DecidableEq ι
inst✝² : Fintype ι
bS : Basis ι R S
adm : AbsoluteValue.IsAdmissible abv
inst✝¹ : Infinite R
inst✝ : DecidableEq R
a : S
b : R
hb : b ≠ 0
dim_pos : 0 < Fintype.card ι
ε : ℝ := ↑(normBound abv bS) ^ (-1 / ↑(Fintype.card ι))
ε_eq : ε = ↑(normBound abv bS) ^ (-1 / ↑(Fintype.card ι))
hε : 0 < ε
⊢ ↑(normBound abv bS) * (abv b • ε) ^ ↑(Fintype.card ι) ≤ ↑(abv b) ^ ↑(Fintype.card ι)

Next tactic:
have := normBound_pos abv bS
/-- We can approximate `a / b : L` with `q / r`, where `r` has finitely many options for `L`. -/
theorem exists_mem_finsetApprox (a : S) {b} (hb : b ≠ (0 : R)) :
    ∃ q : S,
      ∃ r ∈ finsetApprox bS adm, abv (Algebra.norm R (r • a - b • q)) <
      abv (Algebra.norm R (algebraMap R S b)) := by
  have dim_pos := Fintype.card_pos_iff.mpr bS.index_nonempty
  set ε : ℝ := normBound abv bS ^ (-1 / Fintype.card ι : ℝ) with ε_eq
  have hε : 0 < ε := Real.rpow_pos_of_pos (Int.cast_pos.mpr (normBound_pos abv bS)) _
  have ε_le : (normBound abv bS : ℝ) * (abv b • ε) ^ (Fintype.card ι : ℝ)
                ≤ abv b ^ (Fintype.card ι : ℝ) := by
    have := normBound_pos abv bS
    

Proof state:
R : Type u_1
S : Type u_2
K : Type u_3
L : Type u_4
inst✝¹⁶ : EuclideanDomain R
inst✝¹⁵ : CommRing S
inst✝¹⁴ : IsDomain S
inst✝¹³ : Field K
inst✝¹² : Field L
inst✝¹¹ : Algebra R K
inst✝¹⁰ : IsFractionRing R K
inst✝⁹ : Algebra K L
inst✝⁸ : FiniteDimensional K L
inst✝⁷ : IsSeparable K L
algRL : Algebra R L
inst✝⁶ : IsScalarTower R K L
inst✝⁵ : Algebra R S
inst✝⁴ : Algebra S L
ist : IsScalarTower R S L
iic : IsIntegralClosure S R L
abv : AbsoluteValue R ℤ
ι : Type u_5
inst✝³ : DecidableEq ι
inst✝² : Fintype ι
bS : Basis ι R S
adm : AbsoluteValue.IsAdmissible abv
inst✝¹ : Infinite R
inst✝ : DecidableEq R
a : S
b : R
hb : b ≠ 0
dim_pos : 0 < Fintype.card ι
ε : ℝ := ↑(normBound abv bS) ^ (-1 / ↑(Fintype.card ι))
ε_eq : ε = ↑(normBound abv bS) ^ (-1 / ↑(Fintype.card ι))
hε : 0 < ε
this : 0 < normBound abv bS
⊢ ↑(normBound abv bS) * (abv b • ε) ^ ↑(Fintype.card ι) ≤ ↑(abv b) ^ ↑(Fintype.card ι)

Next tactic:
have := abv.nonneg b
/-- We can approximate `a / b : L` with `q / r`, where `r` has finitely many options for `L`. -/
theorem exists_mem_finsetApprox (a : S) {b} (hb : b ≠ (0 : R)) :
    ∃ q : S,
      ∃ r ∈ finsetApprox bS adm, abv (Algebra.norm R (r • a - b • q)) <
      abv (Algebra.norm R (algebraMap R S b)) := by
  have dim_pos := Fintype.card_pos_iff.mpr bS.index_nonempty
  set ε : ℝ := normBound abv bS ^ (-1 / Fintype.card ι : ℝ) with ε_eq
  have hε : 0 < ε := Real.rpow_pos_of_pos (Int.cast_pos.mpr (normBound_pos abv bS)) _
  have ε_le : (normBound abv bS : ℝ) * (abv b • ε) ^ (Fintype.card ι : ℝ)
                ≤ abv b ^ (Fintype.card ι : ℝ) := by
    have := normBound_pos abv bS
    have := abv.nonneg b
    

Proof state:
R : Type u_1
S : Type u_2
K : Type u_3
L : Type u_4
inst✝¹⁶ : EuclideanDomain R
inst✝¹⁵ : CommRing S
inst✝¹⁴ : IsDomain S
inst✝¹³ : Field K
inst✝¹² : Field L
inst✝¹¹ : Algebra R K
inst✝¹⁰ : IsFractionRing R K
inst✝⁹ : Algebra K L
inst✝⁸ : FiniteDimensional K L
inst✝⁷ : IsSeparable K L
algRL : Algebra R L
inst✝⁶ : IsScalarTower R K L
inst✝⁵ : Algebra R S
inst✝⁴ : Algebra S L
ist : IsScalarTower R S L
iic : IsIntegralClosure S R L
abv : AbsoluteValue R ℤ
ι : Type u_5
inst✝³ : DecidableEq ι
inst✝² : Fintype ι
bS : Basis ι R S
adm : AbsoluteValue.IsAdmissible abv
inst✝¹ : Infinite R
inst✝ : DecidableEq R
a : S
b : R
hb : b ≠ 0
dim_pos : 0 < Fintype.card ι
ε : ℝ := ↑(normBound abv bS) ^ (-1 / ↑(Fintype.card ι))
ε_eq : ε = ↑(normBound abv bS) ^ (-1 / ↑(Fintype.card ι))
hε : 0 < ε
this✝ : 0 < normBound abv bS
this : 0 ≤ abv b
⊢ ↑(normBound abv bS) * (abv b • ε) ^ ↑(Fintype.card ι) ≤ ↑(abv b) ^ ↑(Fintype.card ι)

Next tactic:
rw [ε_eq, Algebra.smul_def, eq_intCast, mul_rpow, ← rpow_mul, div_mul_cancel, rpow_neg_one,
      mul_left_comm, mul_inv_cancel, mul_one, rpow_nat_cast]
/-- We can approximate `a / b : L` with `q / r`, where `r` has finitely many options for `L`. -/
theorem exists_mem_finsetApprox (a : S) {b} (hb : b ≠ (0 : R)) :
    ∃ q : S,
      ∃ r ∈ finsetApprox bS adm, abv (Algebra.norm R (r • a - b • q)) <
      abv (Algebra.norm R (algebraMap R S b)) := by
  have dim_pos := Fintype.card_pos_iff.mpr bS.index_nonempty
  set ε : ℝ := normBound abv bS ^ (-1 / Fintype.card ι : ℝ) with ε_eq
  have hε : 0 < ε := Real.rpow_pos_of_pos (Int.cast_pos.mpr (normBound_pos abv bS)) _
  have ε_le : (normBound abv bS : ℝ) * (abv b • ε) ^ (Fintype.card ι : ℝ)
                ≤ abv b ^ (Fintype.card ι : ℝ) := by
    have := normBound_pos abv bS
    have := abv.nonneg b
    rw [ε_eq, Algebra.smul_def, eq_intCast, mul_rpow, ← rpow_mul, div_mul_cancel, rpow_neg_one,
      mul_left_comm, mul_inv_cancel, mul_one, rpow_nat_cast] <;>
      

Proof state:
R : Type u_1
S : Type u_2
K : Type u_3
L : Type u_4
inst✝¹⁶ : EuclideanDomain R
inst✝¹⁵ : CommRing S
inst✝¹⁴ : IsDomain S
inst✝¹³ : Field K
inst✝¹² : Field L
inst✝¹¹ : Algebra R K
inst✝¹⁰ : IsFractionRing R K
inst✝⁹ : Algebra K L
inst✝⁸ : FiniteDimensional K L
inst✝⁷ : IsSeparable K L
algRL : Algebra R L
inst✝⁶ : IsScalarTower R K L
inst✝⁵ : Algebra R S
inst✝⁴ : Algebra S L
ist : IsScalarTower R S L
iic : IsIntegralClosure S R L
abv : AbsoluteValue R ℤ
ι : Type u_5
inst✝³ : DecidableEq ι
inst✝² : Fintype ι
bS : Basis ι R S
adm : AbsoluteValue.IsAdmissible abv
inst✝¹ : Infinite R
inst✝ : DecidableEq R
a : S
b : R
hb : b ≠ 0
dim_pos : 0 < Fintype.card ι
ε : ℝ := ↑(normBound abv bS) ^ (-1 / ↑(Fintype.card ι))
ε_eq : ε = ↑(normBound abv bS) ^ (-1 / ↑(Fintype.card ι))
hε : 0 < ε
this✝ : 0 < normBound abv bS
this : 0 ≤ abv b
⊢ ↑(normBound abv bS) ≠ 0

Next tactic:
try norm_cast; linarith
/-- We can approximate `a / b : L` with `q / r`, where `r` has finitely many options for `L`. -/
theorem exists_mem_finsetApprox (a : S) {b} (hb : b ≠ (0 : R)) :
    ∃ q : S,
      ∃ r ∈ finsetApprox bS adm, abv (Algebra.norm R (r • a - b • q)) <
      abv (Algebra.norm R (algebraMap R S b)) := by
  have dim_pos := Fintype.card_pos_iff.mpr bS.index_nonempty
  set ε : ℝ := normBound abv bS ^ (-1 / Fintype.card ι : ℝ) with ε_eq
  have hε : 0 < ε := Real.rpow_pos_of_pos (Int.cast_pos.mpr (normBound_pos abv bS)) _
  have ε_le : (normBound abv bS : ℝ) * (abv b • ε) ^ (Fintype.card ι : ℝ)
                ≤ abv b ^ (Fintype.card ι : ℝ) := by
    have := normBound_pos abv bS
    have := abv.nonneg b
    rw [ε_eq, Algebra.smul_def, eq_intCast, mul_rpow, ← rpow_mul, div_mul_cancel, rpow_neg_one,
      mul_left_comm, mul_inv_cancel, mul_one, rpow_nat_cast] <;>
      try 

Proof state:
R : Type u_1
S : Type u_2
K : Type u_3
L : Type u_4
inst✝¹⁶ : EuclideanDomain R
inst✝¹⁵ : CommRing S
inst✝¹⁴ : IsDomain S
inst✝¹³ : Field K
inst✝¹² : Field L
inst✝¹¹ : Algebra R K
inst✝¹⁰ : IsFractionRing R K
inst✝⁹ : Algebra K L
inst✝⁸ : FiniteDimensional K L
inst✝⁷ : IsSeparable K L
algRL : Algebra R L
inst✝⁶ : IsScalarTower R K L
inst✝⁵ : Algebra R S
inst✝⁴ : Algebra S L
ist : IsScalarTower R S L
iic : IsIntegralClosure S R L
abv : AbsoluteValue R ℤ
ι : Type u_5
inst✝³ : DecidableEq ι
inst✝² : Fintype ι
bS : Basis ι R S
adm : AbsoluteValue.IsAdmissible abv
inst✝¹ : Infinite R
inst✝ : DecidableEq R
a : S
b : R
hb : b ≠ 0
dim_pos : 0 < Fintype.card ι
ε : ℝ := ↑(normBound abv bS) ^ (-1 / ↑(Fintype.card ι))
ε_eq : ε = ↑(normBound abv bS) ^ (-1 / ↑(Fintype.card ι))
hε : 0 < ε
this✝ : 0 < normBound abv bS
this : 0 ≤ abv b
⊢ ↑(normBound abv bS) ≠ 0

Next tactic:
norm_cast
/-- We can approximate `a / b : L` with `q / r`, where `r` has finitely many options for `L`. -/
theorem exists_mem_finsetApprox (a : S) {b} (hb : b ≠ (0 : R)) :
    ∃ q : S,
      ∃ r ∈ finsetApprox bS adm, abv (Algebra.norm R (r • a - b • q)) <
      abv (Algebra.norm R (algebraMap R S b)) := by
  have dim_pos := Fintype.card_pos_iff.mpr bS.index_nonempty
  set ε : ℝ := normBound abv bS ^ (-1 / Fintype.card ι : ℝ) with ε_eq
  have hε : 0 < ε := Real.rpow_pos_of_pos (Int.cast_pos.mpr (normBound_pos abv bS)) _
  have ε_le : (normBound abv bS : ℝ) * (abv b • ε) ^ (Fintype.card ι : ℝ)
                ≤ abv b ^ (Fintype.card ι : ℝ) := by
    have := normBound_pos abv bS
    have := abv.nonneg b
    rw [ε_eq, Algebra.smul_def, eq_intCast, mul_rpow, ← rpow_mul, div_mul_cancel, rpow_neg_one,
      mul_left_comm, mul_inv_cancel, mul_one, rpow_nat_cast] <;>
      try norm_cast; 

Proof state:
R : Type u_1
S : Type u_2
K : Type u_3
L : Type u_4
inst✝¹⁶ : EuclideanDomain R
inst✝¹⁵ : CommRing S
inst✝¹⁴ : IsDomain S
inst✝¹³ : Field K
inst✝¹² : Field L
inst✝¹¹ : Algebra R K
inst✝¹⁰ : IsFractionRing R K
inst✝⁹ : Algebra K L
inst✝⁸ : FiniteDimensional K L
inst✝⁷ : IsSeparable K L
algRL : Algebra R L
inst✝⁶ : IsScalarTower R K L
inst✝⁵ : Algebra R S
inst✝⁴ : Algebra S L
ist : IsScalarTower R S L
iic : IsIntegralClosure S R L
abv : AbsoluteValue R ℤ
ι : Type u_5
inst✝³ : DecidableEq ι
inst✝² : Fintype ι
bS : Basis ι R S
adm : AbsoluteValue.IsAdmissible abv
inst✝¹ : Infinite R
inst✝ : DecidableEq R
a : S
b : R
hb : b ≠ 0
dim_pos : 0 < Fintype.card ι
ε : ℝ := ↑(normBound abv bS) ^ (-1 / ↑(Fintype.card ι))
ε_eq : ε = ↑(normBound abv bS) ^ (-1 / ↑(Fintype.card ι))
hε : 0 < ε
this✝ : 0 < normBound abv bS
this : 0 ≤ abv b
⊢ ¬normBound abv bS = 0

Next tactic:
linarith
/-- We can approximate `a / b : L` with `q / r`, where `r` has finitely many options for `L`. -/
theorem exists_mem_finsetApprox (a : S) {b} (hb : b ≠ (0 : R)) :
    ∃ q : S,
      ∃ r ∈ finsetApprox bS adm, abv (Algebra.norm R (r • a - b • q)) <
      abv (Algebra.norm R (algebraMap R S b)) := by
  have dim_pos := Fintype.card_pos_iff.mpr bS.index_nonempty
  set ε : ℝ := normBound abv bS ^ (-1 / Fintype.card ι : ℝ) with ε_eq
  have hε : 0 < ε := Real.rpow_pos_of_pos (Int.cast_pos.mpr (normBound_pos abv bS)) _
  have ε_le : (normBound abv bS : ℝ) * (abv b • ε) ^ (Fintype.card ι : ℝ)
                ≤ abv b ^ (Fintype.card ι : ℝ) := by
    have := normBound_pos abv bS
    have := abv.nonneg b
    rw [ε_eq, Algebra.smul_def, eq_intCast, mul_rpow, ← rpow_mul, div_mul_cancel, rpow_neg_one,
      mul_left_comm, mul_inv_cancel, mul_one, rpow_nat_cast] <;>
      

Proof state:
case h
R : Type u_1
S : Type u_2
K : Type u_3
L : Type u_4
inst✝¹⁶ : EuclideanDomain R
inst✝¹⁵ : CommRing S
inst✝¹⁴ : IsDomain S
inst✝¹³ : Field K
inst✝¹² : Field L
inst✝¹¹ : Algebra R K
inst✝¹⁰ : IsFractionRing R K
inst✝⁹ : Algebra K L
inst✝⁸ : FiniteDimensional K L
inst✝⁷ : IsSeparable K L
algRL : Algebra R L
inst✝⁶ : IsScalarTower R K L
inst✝⁵ : Algebra R S
inst✝⁴ : Algebra S L
ist : IsScalarTower R S L
iic : IsIntegralClosure S R L
abv : AbsoluteValue R ℤ
ι : Type u_5
inst✝³ : DecidableEq ι
inst✝² : Fintype ι
bS : Basis ι R S
adm : AbsoluteValue.IsAdmissible abv
inst✝¹ : Infinite R
inst✝ : DecidableEq R
a : S
b : R
hb : b ≠ 0
dim_pos : 0 < Fintype.card ι
ε : ℝ := ↑(normBound abv bS) ^ (-1 / ↑(Fintype.card ι))
ε_eq : ε = ↑(normBound abv bS) ^ (-1 / ↑(Fintype.card ι))
hε : 0 < ε
this✝ : 0 < normBound abv bS
this : 0 ≤ abv b
⊢ ↑(Fintype.card ι) ≠ 0

Next tactic:
try norm_cast; linarith