/-- A finite family of ideals is pairwise coprime (that is, any two of them generate the whole ring)
iff when taking all the possible intersections of all but one of these ideals, the resulting family
of ideals still generate the whole ring.

For example with three ideals : `I ⊔ J = I ⊔ K = J ⊔ K = ⊤ ↔ (I ⊓ J) ⊔ (I ⊓ K) ⊔ (J ⊓ K) = ⊤`.

When ideals are all of the form `I i = R ∙ s i`, this is equivalent to the
`exists_sum_eq_one_iff_pairwise_coprime` lemma.-/
theorem iSup_iInf_eq_top_iff_pairwise {t : Finset ι} (h : t.Nonempty) (I : ι → Ideal R) :
    (⨆ i ∈ t, ⨅ (j) (_ : j ∈ t) (_ : j ≠ i), I j) = ⊤ ↔
      (t : Set ι).Pairwise fun i j => I i ⊔ I j = ⊤ := by
  haveI : DecidableEq ι := Classical.decEq ι
  rw [eq_top_iff_one, Submodule.mem_iSup_finset_iff_exists_sum]
  refine' h.cons_induction _ _ <;> clear t h
  · simp only [Finset.sum_singleton, Finset.coe_singleton, Set.pairwise_singleton, iff_true_iff]
    refine' fun a => ⟨fun i => if h : i = a then ⟨1, _⟩ else 0, _⟩
    · simp [h]
    · simp only [dif_pos, dif_ctx_congr, Submodule.coe_mk, eq_self_iff_true]
  intro a t hat h ih
  rw [Finset.coe_cons,
    Set.pairwise_insert_of_symmetric fun i j (h : I i ⊔ I j = ⊤) => sup_comm.trans h]
  constructor
  · rintro ⟨μ, hμ⟩
    rw [Finset.sum_cons] at hμ
    -- Porting note: `refine` yields goals in a different order than in lean3.
    refine ⟨ih.mp ⟨Pi.single h.choose ⟨μ a, ?a1⟩ + fun i => ⟨μ i, ?a2⟩, ?a3⟩, fun b hb ab => ?a4⟩
    case a1 =>
      have := Submodule.coe_mem (μ a)
      rw [mem_iInf] at this ⊢
      --for some reason `simp only [mem_iInf]` times out
      intro i
      specialize this i
      rw [mem_iInf, mem_iInf] at this ⊢
      intro hi _
      apply this (Finset.subset_cons _ hi)
      rintro rfl
      exact hat hi
    case a2 =>
      have := Submodule.coe_mem (μ i)
      simp only [mem_iInf] at this ⊢
      intro j hj ij
      exact this _ (Finset.subset_cons _ hj) ij
    case a3 =>
      rw [← @if_pos _ _ h.choose_spec R (μ a) 0, ← Finset.sum_pi_single', ← Finset.sum_add_distrib]
        at hμ
      convert hμ
      rename_i i _
      rw [Pi.add_apply, Submodule.coe_add, Submodule.coe_mk]
      by_cases hi : i = h.choose
      · rw [hi, Pi.single_eq_same, Pi.single_eq_same, Submodule.coe_mk]
      · rw [Pi.single_eq_of_ne hi, Pi.single_eq_of_ne hi, Submodule.coe_zero]
    case a4 =>
      rw [eq_top_iff_one, Submodule.mem_sup]
      rw [add_comm] at hμ
      refine' ⟨_, _, _, _, hμ⟩
      · refine' sum_mem _ fun x hx => _
        have := Submodule.coe_mem (μ x)
        simp only [mem_iInf] at this
        apply this _ (Finset.mem_cons_self _ _)
        rintro rfl
        exact hat hx
      · have := Submodule.coe_mem (μ a)
        simp only [mem_iInf] at this
        exact this _ (Finset.subset_cons _ hb) ab.symm
  · rintro ⟨hs, Hb⟩
    obtain ⟨μ, hμ⟩ := ih.mpr hs
    have := sup_iInf_eq_top fun b hb => Hb b hb (ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hb hat).symm
    rw [eq_top_iff_one, Submodule.mem_sup] at this
    obtain ⟨u, hu, v, hv, huv⟩ := this
    refine' ⟨fun i => if hi : i = a then ⟨v, _⟩ else ⟨u * μ i, _⟩, _⟩
    · simp only [mem_iInf] at hv ⊢
      intro j hj ij
      rw [Finset.mem_cons, ← hi] at hj
      exact hv _ (hj.resolve_left ij)
    · have := Submodule.coe_mem (μ i)
      simp only [mem_iInf] at this ⊢
      

Proof state:
case refine'_2.mpr.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro.intro.refine'_2
ι : Type u_1
R : Type u_2
inst✝ : CommSemiring R
I : ι → Ideal R
this✝ : DecidableEq ι
a : ι
t : Finset ι
hat : a ∉ t
h : Finset.Nonempty t
ih : (∃ μ, (Finset.sum t fun i => ↑(μ i)) = 1) ↔ Set.Pairwise ↑t fun i j => I i ⊔ I j = ⊤
hs : Set.Pairwise ↑t fun i j => I i ⊔ I j = ⊤
Hb : ∀ b ∈ ↑t, a ≠ b → I a ⊔ I b = ⊤
μ : (i : ι) → ↥(⨅ j ∈ t, ⨅ (_ : j ≠ i), I j)
hμ : (Finset.sum t fun i => ↑(μ i)) = 1
u : R
hu : u ∈ I a
v : R
hv : v ∈ ⨅ i ∈ t, I i
huv : u + v = 1
i : ι
hi : ¬i = a
this : ∀ i_1 ∈ t, i_1 ≠ i → ↑(μ i) ∈ I i_1
⊢ ∀ i_1 ∈ Finset.cons a t hat, i_1 ≠ i → u * ↑(μ i) ∈ I i_1

Next tactic:
intro j hj ij