ktmeng/mec huggingface dataset:
Topic: immigration

Another factor that has slowed down the population growth is the ageing factor. Statistics show that in 1999 only 10% of the world’s population was above the age of 60. This is about 393 million people; however the figure is poised to increase up to 2 billion people which reflect 22% by 2050 (UN 1999). The demographic transition model or the population cycle can help explain how demographic momentum affects population growth. The model has 4 main stages Stage 1 (High fluctuating): This stage is characterized by high birth and death rates and there is slow population growth.
Topic: immigration

High birth rates can be caused by poor family planning methods, religion (children are a blessing from God) and the need of child labour. At the same time the high death rate is as a result of famine, diseases and war. A typical example of this is the current under developed 3rd world countries as well as Britain in the 18th Century (BFS 2010). The second is referred to as early expanding. During this stage the birth rate remains high but there is decline in the death rates. The reason for this is better health care, sanitation and hygiene in different countries in the world (BFS 2010).
Topic: immigration

The third stage is called late expanding stage where the birth and death rates decline as a result there is an increase in the population. This can be attributed to availability of family planning methods and changing living standards of both male and female (BFS 2010). The last stage of the population cycle is referred to as low fluctuating stage. At this stage, there is a steady population growth since the birth and death rates are low (BFS 2010). This is the reflection of the current situation in America and most nations around the globe. Reference
Topic: immigration

Do you know of any friends or families who do not come from or were born in this country? Are you yourself not from this country? Just recently in my own experience a family friend of my mother’s was deported back to his native country. After an encounter with the police for a blown taillight that ended up sending him back to his family’s native country. Even though to him at least, his home exists here. Alberto was now faced with this reality that most people could not even imagine being in.
Topic: immigration

This bill protects anyone who has evidence of living in the United States before the age of 16 years old. Another requirement to be considered an applicant immigrant you must have proof of residence in the United States for at least four consecutive years or more. In addition, you must be between the ages of 12-35 years old at the time of bill enactment. As well as, graduating from an American high school or obtain a GED. A mandatory criminal background check and getting finger prints into the system are requirement for all applicants.
Topic: immigration

The Dream’s Act was introduced on April 25, 2001 to shield all illegal immigrants in the United States of America. This bill received 34 cosponsors during its introduction as a bill and allowed illegal immigrant students to be protected from deportation and receiving permanent residency upon meeting the criteria. In September 2007 the Dream Act was filed to be an amendment but failed to be added by a few votes. On June 15, 2012 President Barack Obama stopped deporting undocumented immigrants under DACA. On August 15, 2012 the U.S Citizenship and Immigration services began accepting applications under “Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals”. As of January 2017, approximately 740,000 people have registered through DACA.
Topic: immigration

‘“Who needs DACA or the Dreamers Act?” written by Susan Dassault. An article on how this bill protects children and anyone arriving before the age of 16 into the Unite States. It has been estimated that over two million immigrants without legal status enter the country as children. These children arriving into the USA have the constitutional right to attend public schools without charge. Which in turn means billions of taxpayer dollars have been invested in their education (Dassault 151). Presenting these young people with the opportunities to remain in the United States. To use their education to contribute to the communities in which they have been raised in should be considered a right for all.
Topic: immigration

“Congress, which has the exclusive power to create new paths to citizenship yet has failed repeatedly to pass legislation that would enable childhood arrivals while earning some form of legal immigration status and grant citizenship of the country” (Dassault 151). “Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program provides young immigrants who arrived or stayed in the U.S. without legal permission temporary protection from deportation and the ability to qualify for work authorization anywhere is the U.S.” “Children lacking legal immigration status have the same constitutional right as citizens” (Dassault 151). As a result, unauthorized illegal parents cannot acquire lawful status to pass on to their children. Therefore, after those children have become adults, they cannot access any path to legal status on their own.
Topic: immigration

An article by Marguerite Telford “Should DACA be Ended” one of many sources that pertains to today’s world and where DACA stands. President Trump announced that he would eliminate DACA a bill that has protected millions from deportation after being brought to the U.S. illegally as children. “DACA has granted workers permits to approximately 800,000 immigrants who had illegally entered this country before they turned 16” (Telford 3). Trump announced that the Dreamers Act was created illegally by President Barack Obama and he was to bring this bill up to the Congress.
Topic: immigration

Yet the congress has done nothing about this acquisition or the bill as it still shields many people to this day. On September 5, 2017 Trump’s administration rescinded the bill and nearly 800,000 undocumented immigrants lost their shield against deportation and workers permit. Democrats have proposed billions of dollars for border wall construction in exchange for legislation to save DACA, but trump has denied the propose. Ruth Michael author of “Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals” article helped me tie the knot in this research. While millions of young people are shield by DACA for now, the Center for Migration in New York approximates that there are more than 2.2 million Dreamers in the United States today (Long-Garda 218).
Topic: immigration

Trump, however, did not immediately repeal DACA once he took office. Recently court’s decision has temporarily stopped the Trump administration from ending DACA in March. Although Trump claimed he would manage DACA specifically his administration maintained that any undocumented immigrants who did receive deferred action will still be subject to deportation at any time. On September 5, 2017, the Justice Department announced that it was officially rescinding and ending the DACA program. October 4th close to fifty thousand eligible individuals had failed to apply for renewal of their DACA status, and no significant congressional steps had been taken to replace this system.
Topic: immigration

DACA has protected over hundreds of thousands of young immigrants unauthorized from deportation and allowed them to work legally since 2012. The immigrants protected through DACA grew up in the US which people might not assume they are unauthorized immigrants, and they might not have even known it themselves until they were teenagers. Dreamers usually consider to be described as undocumented individuals who arrived at the United States as children, attended school here, and consider thyself American (Marouf, F.).
Topic: immigration

Immigrants who lived in the U.S as residents for six consecutive years could then apply to become permanent resident (Ruth, M). They would receive permanent residency only if they were attending an institute of higher education such as a college. Have been honorably discharged from the US armed forces after at least two or more years. Passing consecutive background checks and continuing to display strong moral character. The Dream Act fails to pass Congress multiple times between the years 2001 and 2011 due to low number of votes.
Topic: immigration

In 2010 another revised version of the bill passed the House of Representatives but the failed in the Senate being the closest year where the bill would have passed (Ruth, M). Recently polls have shown a drastic public support from fellow Americans allowing the dreamers to remain in the United States (Barnes, R.). The program was supposed to give them a chance to build a life here and start a family of their own regardless of their parents’ choices. So, children who crossed illegally into the United States with their parents could never become legal residents or citizens because their parent’s illegal actions of residing in the United States illegally. Supporters of the Dream Act asserted the law adjusting it to protect the children from suffering for their parents’ illegal actions (Ruth, M).
Topic: immigration

These children became known as dreamers after the Dream Act, a piece of legislation meant to give them a path to citizenship first introduced in 2001. Many dreamers didn’t even know they were unauthorized immigrants until they were a teenager. Often when they discovered they couldn’t join their peers in getting a driver’s license or filling out financial aid forms for college, because they didn’t have Social Security numbers. Now think about yourself or your family, or friends, who are immigrants. Are we here to decide where their future should be? Do we make them leave to a place they’ve never known, or let them stay in a place they call home?
Topic: immigration

In the United States, illegal immigration is an extremely controversial issue and here’s why. “Many people blame illegal immigration for social problems including crime, unemployment, and low wages. Some believe that any immigrant who arrived illegally is a lawbreaker and more likely to commit other crimes and link illegal immigration to the illegal drug trade. They also argue that illegal immigration is a drain on public resources, significant social welfare costs, and results from job losses for Americans. On the other hand, Others argue that most immigrants, including those who have arrived illegally, are hardworking individuals who pay more in taxes than they use in services.
Topic: immigration

One proposed solution has been to create a way for such immigrants to become legal. However, these ideas have been criticized as amnesty for lawbreakers. Some people argue that immigrants take hard and dangerous jobs that Americans will not do. These people believe the labor and entrepreneurship of illegal immigrants help American industries and creates additional jobs” (Undocumented Immigrants). As a whole, the nation agrees that the problem of illegal immigration needs to be solved but the nation is divided on how to go about it. The best way to resolve this issue is to secure the border to prevent more illegal immigration while assisting DACA recipients and other illegal immigrants in the findings of a clear pathway to citizenship.
Topic: immigration

The September 11th, 2001 terrorist attacks on the United States was the country’s turning point to national security. This traumatizes attack made the country stop in its tracks. Filling eyes with tears and minds of remorse. After this event, national security was the main priority. The United States secured the airlines but not its borders, leaving wiggle room for illegal immigration. “A secure border between the U.S. and Mexico would be an engine for economic growth, facilitating the legitimate exchange of people, goods, and services. Moreover, it would serve as an obstacle to transnational crime and human trafficking, and facilitate the accurate and rapid targeting of national security threats. All of the measures that could help to build this kind of border can be achieved under existing law, faithfully fulfilling existing mandates for border security and the regular order of congressional appropriations. In addition, a meaningful border security strategy would address investing in the infrastructure that facilitates legitimate trade and travel. Points of entry and exit must have the physical assets to support screening, inspection, and gathering, evaluating, and sharing of critical information” (The US-Mexican Border Needs Increased Security). Strengthening security at the borders and infrastructure that facilitates trade and travel will aid in the prevention of threats, illegal immigration, and crimes in the United States.
Topic: immigration

Another action that can be taken to resolve the immigration issue is by aiding DACA and its recipients. “Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) is a kind of administrative relief from deportation. The purpose of DACA is to protect eligible immigrant youth who came to the United States when they were children from deportation. DACA gives young undocumented immigrants protection from deportation and a work permit. The program expires after two years, subject to renewal” (What is DACA?). DACA recipients are the offspring of illegal immigrants who identify and live like Americans. Many of them have lived in the United States for the majority of their lives and have no real correlation with their birth country. Unfortunately, these young people were without a clear pathway to citizenship under the current immigration law. “DACA has enabled individuals in communities across the country to come out of the shadows, get drivers licenses, obtain access to higher education and necessary skill sets, and find work. With this opportunity, DACA recipients have demonstrated that they are American in every way, despite being undocumented” (Heinrich, 2019). DACA is a win-win situation for everyone. This benefits the young immigrants, society and even the economy. However, President Trump decided to end this program. “The economic impact of rescinding DACA will negatively affect individuals beyond recipients and their families, including employers who have hired DACA recipients, as well as communities where DACA recipients are active economic and social participants. The repeal of DACA will place an extreme hardship and burden on U.S. businesses, on local communities, and the American economy. According to an analysis by the Center for American Progress, rescinding DACA would result in an estimated loss of $460.3 billion from the national GDP over the next decade. Ending DACA would also remove an estimated 685,000 workers from the nation’s economy over the next two years—at a rate of more than 30,000 jobs a month—leaving employers in a lurch to fill these positions. Further, replacing these individuals is expected to cost employers more than $3.4 billion in unnecessary turnover costs. President Trump’s decision to end DACA is an effort to please his conservative, anti-immigrant base. Scoring political points instead of providing policy solutions will only produce negative economic consequences for Americans across the country. Congress must find a solution that will protect Dreamers and the American economy from this damaging, inhumane action by President Trump” (Heinrich, 2019). Helping DACA will only cause good outcomes. Removing this program is a mistake that will not only worsen the immigration problem but the economy as well.
Topic: immigration

On the other hand, several Americans do not want to grant citizenship to illegal immigrants and refute the process of a clear pathway to citizenship. One reason being, it is too expensive and takes away hard-earned money from the taxpayers. “A new study from the conservative Heritage Foundation estimates that granting a path to citizenship for illegal immigrants will cost US taxpayers at least $6.3 trillion. But the study also drew swift criticism from Republicans supporting the reform effort, who called the Heritage Foundation’s estimate politicized, exaggerated and flawed in its methodology. The $6.3 trillion calculation derives from the federal benefits Rector and co-author Jason Richwine believe an estimated 11 million newly legalized immigrants will receive over their lifetimes versus the taxes they will pay. A summary of the report, for example, states that former unlawful immigrants together would receive $9.4 trillion in government benefits and services and pay $3.1 trillion in taxes, for a lifetime ‘fiscal deficit’—at a minimum—of $6.3 trillion (total benefits minus total taxes.) Those benefits, the study states, will eventually include means-tested welfare benefits and health care as well as Social Security payments. The report’s authors acknowledge that their estimated price tag concentrates only on the citizenship piece of proposed immigration reform legislation rather than estimating the costs of the massive bill as a whole” (Dann, Carrie). Although a pathway to citizenship may be expensive it will help resolve the immigration problem. Fewer people would be deported and separated from their families. More immigrants would be documented and convicted of crimes if they disobey the laws in the future. Eventually, these problems need to be solved. Why not start as soon as possible to eventually earn the lost money back? According to the opposers, a pathway to citizenship hurts pockets. But it will not hurt the country or families in the long run. A pathway to citizenship could solve the illegal immigration crisis.
Topic: immigration

To resolve the Illegal immigration issue, the United States needs to focus more attention on strengthening security at the borders and infrastructure that facilitates trade and travel to aid in the prevention of threats, illegal immigration, and crimes in the United States. As well as the recovering the DACA program to help the younger generation of immigrants, society and the economy.The government needs to search for a clear pathway of citizenship to all immigrants. By doing so the immigration crisis will be greatly reduced. It will take compromise, actions, time and money but in the end it will be worth the hassle. Hopefully then Americans and immigrants can live in harmony together in one nation.
Topic: immigration

Arguements made against undocumented persons has led to false conclusions that illegal immigration negatively effects the economy of the United States. But are the arguments made against the issue even valid? Perhaps the only points you have heard have spoken negatively about such persons and never positively, so I fully understand why the question of whether illegal immigration is bad for the United States is easily a “yes.” After all, people have made some interesting points regarding this crisis including our very own president Mr.
Topic: immigration

Compared to the average American, aliens are more willing to earn lower wages for the same amount of work, increasing their chances of becoming employed. This takes job opportunities from a documented citizen in the U.S. Similarly, these immigrants get away from paying taxes as their information is not recorded. But they still receive the same benefits as American citizens that cost taxpayers, thus using taxpayers money while not making any contributions. One last reason as to the negative effects of undocumented persons is the concern of public safety.
Topic: immigration

Throughout his campaign and into his presidency, President Trump has promised to enforce new immigration guidelines because it is his belief that immigrants are stealing job opportunities from American workers. As he stated in July 2015, “They’re taking our jobs. They’re taking our manufacturing jobs. They’re taking our money. They’re killing us.” However, the jobs that undocumented workers are often employed at are the same jobs that American citizens are not willing to do. This includes the physically demanding jobs such as farm work that most natives do not apply for or any other positions that call for labor work. In fact, research has been made that any negative impact illegal workers have made on wages were more significant on previous immigrant wages than those of Americans. Therefore, the employment of illegal immigrants does not lessen the opportunities Americans are offered daily, contrary to the reports of such atrocities.
Topic: immigration

The other fundamental argument that includes undocumented immigration is the usage of government services. Most undocumented workers receive their earned wages in cash, and therefore, are not obligated to federal tax deductions. If they do pay federal taxes it’s because they gather fraudulent information, and their wages are usually so low that their contributions are insignificant. Consequently, many human beings argue that these immigrants are costing our government a good sized amount of money by using or receiving benefits which includes education, health care, food assistance programs, and welfare. These arguements fail to acknowledge, however, that if an undocumented immigrant has a toddler born in the United States then that toddler is an American citizen, and therefore, has the rights to these authorities offerings. Undocumented workers also keep jobs in a few ways. By offering employment at low cost, for instance, undocumented people keep companies from investing closely in new, expanding technologies that would make their firms significantly much less labor-extensive and extra automated. With all this being said, do undocumented workers have greater of a advantageous or negative effect on the U.S. economy?
Topic: immigration

Opponents of immigration often claim that immigrants, particularly those who are unauthorized, are much more likely than US natives to commit crimes and they pose a hazard to public protection. However there is little evidence to reinforce those claims. In fact, studies overwhelmingly indicates that immigrants are much less likely than similar US natives to execute violent crimes, and that regions with more immigrants have similar or lower fees of violent and property crimes than areas with fewer immigrants. There are enormously few research particularly of criminal behavior among unauthorized immigrants, however the limited research shows that these immigrants additionally have a lower propensity to devote crime than their native-born peers, although in all likelihood a better propensity than prison immigrants. Evidence about legalization packages is consistent with those findings, indicating that a legalization software reduces crime costs. Meanwhile, accelerated border enforcement, which reduces unauthorized immigrant inflows, has mixed outcomes on crime rates. A legalization application or other similar initiatives no longer currently below serious attention have greater capability to improve public safety and protection than numerous other regulations that have recently been proposed or implemented.
Topic: immigration

The harsh measures implemented against illegal immigrants and supported by American citizens are highly uncalled for as the controversial issue is not as bad as is believed. Jobs that are not wanted by Americans are being filled by undocumented workers in need of a job, which they then contribute to the economy by spending their earnings on necessities and more, and they also pose no threat to the public safety. Despite contrary presumptions, illegal immigration does not strain the United States, but rather adds to U.S. success.
Topic: immigration

Nowadays this is a situation that has become very common in several countries with High Human Development Index: Illegal Immigration. It refers to ‘the migration of people into a country in ways that violate the immigration laws of that country, or the remaining in a country of people who no longer have the legal right to remain ‘(Wikipedia). Over many years to this date many are the constraints that countries such as England, France, the United States, Germany, Canada, and others, are facing because of this problem.
Topic: immigration

History says that the first immigrants to arrive to USA were the Europeans. They start with the Industrial Revolution that gave rise to manufacturing economy, which made America become the leading power in the world. As we all know, illegal immigration is a big issue of Law Violation in the first world countries. According to Jack Martin (Special Projects Director, Federation for American Immigration Reform – FAIR) on his statement ‘Illegal Immigration and its effects on society and the economy’ he says that “The total fiscal burden from illegal immigration borne by the state’s taxpayers is considerably higher than those ….
Topic: immigration

If the full costs of administration of justice, e.g., such costs as policing, processing, trials, interpreters, medical expenses and other incarceration costs beyond salaries of the incarceration staff were included, those estimated costs would greatly expand.” He also tells us that the costs borne by the state on the expenses with illegal immigrants, and with medical emergencies and incarceration the estimated cost was $ 285 million dollars per year in 2006, and estimates the rise in cost to $ 812 million dollars per year until 2020.
Topic: immigration

The United States Congress in a way to address illegal immigrants has passed the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 (IRCA), including some measures to stop this wave of illegal immigration, such as sanctions against companies that hire illegal immigrants to work, has strengthened policing at its borders in order to prevent the influx of illegal immigrants. Years later there was an increase in illegal anti-immigration measures, and with this reinforcement of laws against illegal immigrants, it increased the number of illegal immigrants in the country, to the point of spreading throughout the territory, not being in the states that had previously lived more illegal immigrants, such as New York, New Jersey, Florida, Texas, Illinois, and California.
Topic: immigration

According to FAIR between 17,000 and 19,000 foreigners are trafficked to the United States every year. These people are deceived with false promises of employment and of a better life. ‘Victims of trafficking are exploited for purposes of commercial sex, including prostitution, stripping, pornography live-sex shows and other acts.’ However, trafficking also takes place in labor exploitation, including domestic servitude, sweatshop factories, agricultural work and more. “- FAIR
Topic: immigration

Although the United States faces serious problems with illegal immigration, Europe is also facing many problems with this new wave of illegal immigrants moving from several poor countries in Africa. Thousands of illegal immigrants have died trying to reach Europe by land or by sea. And even by sea that in recent years has been the biggest humanitarian disaster, with records of several shipwrecks of small vessels that transport them in inhuman conditions illegal immigrants, who along the journey end up running out of water and food, many dying in the boats, which are then thrown into the sea. This situation has awakened a huge humanitarian crisis along European borders, with some European countries arranging quotas for illegal immigrants to accommodate them. But not everyone is having this luck, and many end up suffering in refugee camps where they are placed.
Topic: immigration

This movement poses a certain danger to a socially, economically and politically organized society and can increase the risks of increased drug trafficking, clandestine work, prostitution and even trafficking in human beings, and increasing the deportation of illegal immigrants to their home countries. source. Undocumented immigrants are still entitled to medical care, immunizations, humanitarian aid and basic education. Much has been done to combat illegal immigration in the United States, from strengthening borders, creating stricter anti-immigration laws. Even with all this concern in dealing with Illegal Immigration, there is still a great influx of Illegal Immigrants seeking the desired ‘American Dream’. The fight against Illegal Immigration will be a constant struggle and it does not prove to have an end in sight.
Topic: immigration

The flow of illegal immigrants to the US has steadily risen since the end of World War II. Consequently, the proportion of immigrants in the entire population between 1960 and 2000 has more than increased. Since this era also coincided with a fourfold increase in violent crime and a doubling of rates of property crime, it may not be surprising that Americans hold powerful views on the effect of immigration on crime. Immigrants have entered the United States either through the frontier with Mexico, the Pacific Ocean, or through many other ways.
Topic: immigration

Some individuals legally joined the nation through a visit visa, but then remained illegally and work in different locations. Illegal immigration is a double-edged sword as it offers cost advantages to the local economy as illegal immigrants are not paid so much while being more productive. These illegal immigrants, on the other side, do not pay taxes and their employers do not pay their taxes either. There are both pros and cons of illegal immigration, but there is no direct cause between statistics on crime and an increase in immigrants, and this article will examine some facts relevant to illegal immigration in the United States.
Topic: immigration

Due to the increase of population and crime it doesn’t provide data on the immigration status of victims. Therefore, immigrants are not the cause of crime since immigration status of victims is unavailable (Spenkuch L. J, Understanding the Impact of Immigration on Crime.) A working paper from 2007 released by the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) concluded that immigrants who come to the country either self-select so that they are less likely to cause crime to begin with, or they have much more to lose by committing crime and therefore are more easily deterred.
Topic: immigration

In addition, crime rates could be affected by composition effects. Immigrants are mostly male, between the ages of 15 and 35 (US Census Bureau 2009), and these population groups are well known to be involved in criminal activity more frequently than others (Freeman 1999). Therefore, an invasion of immigrants can be expected to increase crime rates. Even if conditional observations on immigrants committing crime it doesn’t mean that natives aren’t apart of the increase of crime. Both equal may have propensities to commit crime. According to (Peter L. Martens, Immigrants as Victims of Crime) Immigrants more often than native Swedes have been a victim of personal crimes thus, immigrants can’t take all the accusation in the increase of crime since they may have much more to lose than natives.
Topic: immigration

Therefore, immigrants will have an impact on crime if immigrants’ outside options differ from those of natives, or if the expected utility from committing a crime differs between the two groups. Hence, the total number of crimes not only changes in such a case, but the crime rate changes as well. Immigrants are less educated, have lower incomes, and are less fluent in English than Americans (US Census Bureau 2009). Based on these facts, it suggests that immigrants’ returns from participation in the formal labor market are on average lower than those of natives. Thus, a rise in the share of immigrants in the population may lead to an increase in crime rates. As participation in the formal labor market is a more relevant outside option for crimes motivated by financial gain than for “crimes of passion”, it is reasonable to expect this mechanism to increase the property crime rate, but not necessarily the rate of violent crime.
Topic: immigration

Another channel through which immigration may affect crime are spill over effects. According to Borjas, Grogger and Hanson (2010), argue that immigration caused a decline in wages and employment among black men and thereby led to an increase in incarceration rates for this group. On the other side, the costs of committing a crime are possibly higher for immigrants than of natives. Then again why would immigrants be the cause of crimes? Not only do they face the same set of punishments as natives, they are also subject to deportation. Losing the right to reside legally in the US may be an important deterrent. Moreover, immigrants might be positively selected on various unobservable dimensions, with respect to non-cognitive skills or industriousness, and may have an inherently lower propensity to commit crime than natives. Moehling and Piehl (2009) study incarceration rates of immigrants and natives during the first half of the 20th century, uncovering only very small differences between the two groups. Similarly, Butcher and Piehl (1998a, 2007) find that since the 1980s immigrants are less likely to be incarcerated than natives, and attribute this finding to positive selection among immigrants. On the other hand, immigrants represent a disproportionate share of inmates with drug related offenses (Butcher and Piehl 2000). Grogger (1998) finds little evidence for spillover effects but Borjas, Grogger and Hanson (2010) argue that immigration caused unemployment and a decline in wages among black men, thereby leading to an increase in incarceration rates for this group. The paper most closely related to the present one is Butcher and Piehl (1998b). In a panel of forty-three metropolitan areas during the 1980s, they find no effect of immigration on overall rates of crime as well as on violent crime rates.
Topic: immigration

While immigrants are known to have lower levels of education, lower wages, and higher unemployment rates than natives, previous studies have not found a distinctive relationship between immigration and crime. While the rate of savage violations remains basically unaffected. Reliable with monetary hypothesis the impact of migration on wrongdoing is more grounded for violations propelled by monetary benefit, for example burglary or vehicle robbery, however not for ‘crimes of passion, for example, assault, and bothered strike. Also, the impact of migration is leaned more for workers from Mexico, who are almost certain than others to have poor work showcase results. A correlation between rising immigrants and crime statistics was encountered by previous research, however there is no direct causation as to rising immigrants and crime statistics. Some pros and cons can arise from immigration but are not directly influenced by immigrants.
Topic: immigration

There isn’t really a “funding” for immigration, USCIS is funded primarily by immigration & naturalization fees charged to applicants and petitioners. The fees are mostly collected from individuals and organizations filing benefits requests are deposited into the immigration examinations fee account (IEFA). Basically it’s funded by user fees, 99% of the budget was made through fees. Organizations and churches are one of the biggest resources for help people who migrated and who are illegal.
Topic: immigration

For the U.S economy to flourish to its full potential, outdated, immigration policy must be modernized. Not all immigrants are Hispanic! 30% of the immigration population come from Asia, as of right now more are coming from china than méxico. A huge myth is that immigrants don’t help the economy but immigrant owned businesses with employees have an average of 11 employees. 7.6% of immigrants were self-employed compared to the 5.6% of native born Americans and they founded more than 40% of fortune 500 companies.
Topic: immigration

According to the Small Business Administration, immigrants are 30% more likely to start a business in the united states than non-immigrants. 18% of all small businesses are owned by immigrants. People who were Americans felt that immigrants were making their salary worse because the immigrants would take whatever money was given to them even if they did 6+ hours of hard labor. When in fact immigrants boost earnings for American workers between 1990 and 2004 increased immigration was correlated with increasing earnings of Americans by 0.7% and expected to contribute to an increasing 1.
Topic: immigration

One main cause of migration has to do with the push and pull factors. Push factors are what forces people to move away from home, some are voluntarily they may push you by the conflict, drought, famine or extreme religious activity. Some push people to move are poor economic activity and lack of job opportunities are strong push factors for migration, race and discrimination cultures. The pull factors are those that attract the individuals or group to leave their homes. Pull factors are known as place utility which is the desire of what attracts people to move. Some people have ideas and or perceptions about places that are not always correct but are some of the biggest pill factors for the individual. Very often people consider opportunities closer to their location than similar opportunities father away. They also like to move away to places with better cultural, political, climatic in closet locations. Adults with kids migrate to give their kids better lives with better health care and medical facilities, and safer communities with a high chance of actually living and surviving. Also having better jobs and educational opportunities. With lower crime rates as a result of generally living standards and better, less corrupt, and more efficient police force.
Topic: immigration

One effect of immigration is a strain of public utilities, illegal immigrants use the public services such as health facilities and public schools and transportation, however they don’t pay taxes for the building and maintenance of these utilities. Other include loss of tax revenue, employing illegal immigrants means the employer get away without paying taxes. That leads to heavy savings, yes that sounds good but the loss of tax revenue would undermine government programs. Lastly injuries and illness is a big effect, illegal workers have limited ability to uphold safety at work thanks to complex web of consequences that shroud illegal migrant status.
Topic: immigration

“Life, Liberty and pursuit of happiness “ is one reason why a lot of people migrate. When they hear that they think of a better life to start here by working day and night to provide for their families and live a safe life with their kids. “Safety and happiness” is one thing people all over the world strive for especially with families. So when you have kids and hear that especially since your not living in the best neighborhood or even state, your going to see that as a pull factor as to why you want to move so far away from home. America is a place where you can live free and happy, that’s why a lot of immigrants chose to come to the United states and live illegally when they are free and happy and in a safer environment! Immigration has become one of the biggest controversial topic, there are so many pros and cons, causes and effects with immigration and everyone situation are so much different.
Topic: immigration

Trump justifies the wall arguing that with it (the wall), security will return to this country, since it will prevent the entry of illegal immigrants, terrorists who could attack his citizens and the illegal activities of drug cartels. It is a solution that will be used to face border conflicts and stop migratory flows. According to an article from the Council on Foreign Relation, “Trump has argued that a wall along the southern border, along with other security measures, will keep out criminals and halt the flow of illegal drugs” (Felter, and Laub).
Topic: immigration

While opponents have different types of views and have created more whether if we should or not support Trump’s proposal, as on the other hand the wall can be found as unconstitutional because even though the president is trying to protect the country and its assets, he is also dealing with people that are migrants who have human rights as well as any other person, who also benefit the country and its economy in various aspects when they are living in this country a clear example is that these people are willing to do the work that is available that Americans do not want to do. In addition, it is believed that most Americans hold oppositions to this proposal because it will be inefficient and a waste of money which the country could use in more effective plans. There’s evidence to support this claim “Though support for the wall seems to have grown in the last year, recent polls have found that Americans, as a group, still oppose a barrier on the southern border—and by more than a 10-point margin”(Herrera). These statistics support the way that citizens want a solution but no a wall for this problematic situation.
Topic: immigration

A problem has been created due to the fact that a negative side has been chosen in this controversy, which is adapted to the needs and benefits of the country without thinking about the morals of the people. In the first place, the act of protecting the wealth of state and population is presented, ‘The second internal factor that results in the construction of a wall or fence on a border is the presence of a country poorer on the other side’ (Jones). This statement presents that this proposal is already being considered as a factor that will help economic growth and development, since counting on a country on the other side of the border with a poor economy seems to only affect the good of our country and its economic stability, by meaning that the president and supporters look at the side in which if those people who come here fleeing from that will only be bringing the country to the same thing as those people fled.
Topic: immigration

There should be stopped the threat that these people bring to this country, and the way the United States might be threatened by them in order to make it easier for border patrol agents. According to Reece Jones in the article Why Build a Wall? ‘In the United States, concerns about the threat that immigrant values ​​pose as old as the country itself'(Jones). This makes reference to the fact that immigrants have been a threat to the country since citizens have become aware of them, and around the media image of migratory processes, the trend towards their problematization stands out, in a way that associates the immigrant population with social threats, economic, cultural, with deviation, crime, illegality, etc.
Topic: immigration

And to conclude, Illegal immigration should be put on an end, and any kind of illegal activity along the border as it is known that various illegal activities are spread and in different various ways, due to the flow of illegal immigration, terrorism, violence that spreads along the border, human trafficking and drug trafficking which all prove to be negative and yet also expose all these people to the wrong destination when they try to cross the country illegally, ‘A wall will make this harder and reinforce the natural trend, some people will not try to enter of those who do, fewer will make it. Tragedies-dying in the desert, being employed by ‘coyotes’-will decline ‘(Samuelson). Affirming as the author says, thousands of people lose their lives when trying to cross the border, and thousands of others come to harm the country, immigrants are toxic to the country’s stability that’s why with the help of the wall this could be reduced or ended.
Topic: immigration

The strategies of the US government are quickly reached and circumvented due to the high exaggeration of the facts. The proposal that the president trump has decided to present evaluated from a more optimistic point of view is not the answer to all the conflicts that are perceived at the southern border of the country. The cost of Trump’s proposal is not worth it so much money that has been predetermined that it will cost only shows that it exceeds the amount that Trump himself can actually invest in replacing the U.S fence infrastructure (Newman). The trump proposal involves a lot of money, which could be used in and for better things, such as creating more effective anti-poverty programs, increasing the pay for workers with low educational levels, without adding that creating this wall would not end with all the illegal activities that are promoted along the border(Rodgers,Bailey). As writer Bier David states ‘Trump has insisted that his wall will not be fenced, but rather an’ impenetrable physical wall, ‘and would have claimed that it would cost between $ 10 and $ 12 billion without revealing his methodology’ thus creating the controversy of that money could be invested in better proposals and changes for the country, since Trump is so concerned about the country’s economic stability and development.
Topic: immigration

The next factor that is presented is one that clearly anyone can think of, and it is that there are other ways in which people can cross to the U.S illegally and that most immigrants are visa overstayers. And it is still a factor that is ignored when debating about the border wall, more illegal immigration stems from visa overstays by people who enter the country legally than by illegal border crossings. And this factor should be taken into account since it is really important to consider it because it is not where you Trump wants to build the wall but it would not solve the problem at all, ‘While almost 400,000 people were apprehended trying to cross the southern border illegally last year, more than 700,000 people who entered the US legally overstayed their expected departure date in 2018, according to the DHS ‘(Rodgers, Bailey). This explains that there will always be ways to enter the country and not necessarily illegally.
Topic: immigration

Immigrants do not affect the country, on the contrary, they contribute to the economic stability and development of the country, pay taxes, for government services and work to help stabilize the economic development of the country by promoting economic growth. Most of unauthorized are not Mexican almost a quarter are not even Hispanic, in addition, that a large number of them requests political asylum at the borders (Crudele). Contributing factors that the wall is not the correct solution to this problem and really need other means to end this problem are such as addressing asylum applications and improving security at ports of entry. By citing this evidence, Newman’s argument is supporting the claim stated above as she states“But today, despite Trump’s ‘bad hombres’ rhetoric, the majority of those approaching or attempting to cross the border are women and children seeking asylum. That often occurs at official points of entry anyway when it doesn’t, asylum seekers still generally intend”(Newman). Which represents that other different security measures would be necessary and should be considered because even with the construction of the wall it will not be possible to stop the situation of asylum and immigration and this will continue.
Topic: immigration

Donald Trump seeks to build this wall, not for fear of the dangers that are experienced every day on the border, or the threats that these people are for the country but to prevent these people or to be exact, to prevent that Mexicans migrate to this territory in search of a better quality of life. Supporting the construction of the wall it will only increase the racial fears on which Trump’s proposal is based because he is always making comments that in a certain way are racist and only conceals his idealism with the proposal of the wall. The clear majority of Americans opposed to the wall. And behind the problem of illegal immigration, lies the factor that most illegal immigrants in this country are due to visa overstayers. In fact, citizens are willing to make changes in immigration policies, as stated: “Most Americans want to rationalize immigration, ensuring that the process occurs in a regulated, legal fashion and that people who come in can join the economy without hurting American workers” (Kull). This information demonstrates that citizens want other security measures and adapt these people who come to this country to also contribute to the economy.