ktmeng/mec huggingface dataset:
Topic: immigration

A current advocate for Mexican Americans is Eva Longoria. Though not as well known as Rosa Parks, Longoria is doing much work for Hispanic Americans. Eva Jacqueline Longoria Bastón is an American Actress who does non profit work for an organization called the Eva Longoria Foundation. Eva was born on March 15, 1975 in Corpus Christi, Texas. She was born to Mexican American parents. She actually did not learn the Spanish language until 2009. Longoria has acted in many movies, but she has done much more towards correcting the education gap plaguing Latinas. Eva Longoria created Eva’s Heroes in 2006 which helps developmentally disabled children. Her most successful organization, the Eva Longoria Foundation, helps provide Latinos with a chance at high school and college. Longoria was name Philanthropist of the year in 2009. She also was a huge supporter of Barack Obama, and helped him to carry votes by creating the Latino Victory Project. Eva is currently very interested in immigration. She has immersed herself in the issue of immigration and has deemed Arizona’s SB 1070 immigration law as unconstitutional. The law was quote “On April 23, 2010, Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer signed into law Senate Bill 1070 aimed at preventing illegal immigration that has significantly affected the Mexico-bordering state over many decades. The law, entitled Support Our Law Enforcement and Safe Neighborhoods Act, would require law enforcement officials to enforce existing federal immigration laws in the state by checking the immigration status of a person they have ‘reasonable suspicion’ of being in the U.S. illegally. But a U.S. Supreme Court ruling in 2012 and a settlement with plaintiffs in 2016 have collectively gutted the law.” Longoria is one of many current fighters for the equality of minority races.
Topic: immigration

There are many devastating things happening in the United States. It can be argued that things are going downhill, and America isn’t learning from their past mistakes. Racial discrimination and immigration are topics a lot of Americans don’t like to talk about, but equality is at stake. Not many people realize how truly awful things are in the world right now, and instead of everyone just trying to getting along, or at the very least ignoring each other, people are dying at the hands of causes that shouldn’t even exist. It shouldn’t be a questions over whether or not one race is more superior. The color of someone’s skin doesn’t define how smart they are, or how much they can do. All races are beautiful in their own way. Neo-nazis, white supremacists, black separatists, the Ku Klux Klan, etc. need to see that loving your own race doesn’t mean that other races need to be put down. Everyone can win. One race doesn’t have to be angry for another to be happy. The heroes of America’s past and present that are fighting for equal rights are just trying to show that racial discrimination is wrong. I think that fighting for what you believe in is an extremely courageous thing to do. Donald Trump’s immigration views are something that can be fought against. It’s something that will be fought against. The first amendment states that “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.” This law means that people are free to believe and think what they want. I will never promote violence among groups of people, but simply educate people on the way that all people deserve to be treated. Racism is wrong, and no one deserves to be treated as if they are less pure than anyone else because of the color of their skin.
Topic: immigration

s.. History. predictable with The National Academies Press, they declare that ‘the United autochthonous Americans, can follow their beginning to outsiders from totally extraordinary countries round the world’ (Read ‘Measurements on U.S movement: AN Assessment of data needs for Future research’ at NAP.edu pp. 28-29). By sheer numbers, the u. s. incorporates a bigger transient populace than the other country, ‘with forty seven million outsiders starting at 2015’ (Read ‘measurements on U.
Topic: immigration

A few countries have bigger proportions of settlers than the u. s. for instance, Suisse has ‘24.9 p.c and North American country, with 21.9 p.c of outsiders’ (‘Migration Report 2017 International transient stock’ at global organisation.org p.8). In America, migrants have contend a fundamental job in becoming the U.S. economy. Numerous new U.S. organizations are presently cost $1 billion or extra a few of those were built up by vagrants. fortieth of Fortune and five hundred associations were started by migrants or their adolescents, and each one six of America’s 2016 respect champs in science and financial science were workers.
Topic: immigration

To be sure, while most Americans property their legacy and methods for life as a ‘nation of nonnatives’ (How America’s Identity Politics Went from Inclusion to Division para. 2-9). there’s an astounding help base for relocation as a crucial aspect for monetary improvement and as a fundamental piece of a cosmopolitan culture among a few Americans. Almost sixty million individuals, very 20% of the blend individuals of the u. s., are pioneers or the posterity of staff. For a larger than usual part of this system, the vagrant course of action is definitely not a theoretical logic, notwithstanding, a route for family joining together and affirmation that they’re a touch of the ‘American Dream’ (The Impact of Immigration on yankee Society: needing Backward to the more drawn out term para. 1).
Topic: immigration

On the elective feature, there’s a noteworthy offer, a greater a piece of Americans UN office are against a continuation of top to bottom movement. different opponents of development are ‘old-stock Americans, UN office have everything aside from their outsider forerunners’, ‘Numerous development rivals are ‘ past – stock Americans UN organization have everything anyway their remote antecedents, ‘ they ordinarily board private or country networks, and loads of have modestly next to no contact with outside families in their neighborhoods, spots of love and fellowship frameworks.’ (The Impact of Immigration on yankee Society: needing Backward to the more drawn out term para. 2). different Americans, similar to individuals wherever the place, ‘Are extra OK with the comfortable than with change; they anticipate that newcomers with shifted lingos, religions, and social orders are reluctant to drench up into yankee culture and to be told English’ (Kanter para. 2-5).
Topic: immigration

The Catholic Catechism trains that reasonable administration has 2 errands. the essential undertaking is to respect AN outsider out of warmth and regard for the individual. this is frequently because of people have the right to move. the govt should, accordingly, agree to one side to the best degree potential. predictable with a composing uncovered by the u. s. Gathering of Catholic Bishops, ‘The extra prosperous countries, to the degree that they’re prepared, are committed to respect the outsider looking for the security and sustenance that he can’t understand in his nation of starting point. Open specialists should ensure that the normal right that shields a visitor from individuals who get him is regarded’ (Catholic Churches Position in Immigration p.2, sec.1).
Topic: immigration

The second undertaking is to anchor one’s outskirt and to uphold the law for the decent of the people. All countries are qualified for uphold their laws, and everyone should regard the authentic exercise of this right. for instance, ‘Political specialists, for the commonweal that they’re responsible, could make the activity of the right to move subject to various legitimate conditions, identifying with the obligations of outsiders towards their received nation. Outsiders are committed to regard the texture and religious legacy of the nation that gets them with feeling, to adjust its laws and to help worry about metro concerns’ (Catholic Social Teaching para. 2-3).
Topic: immigration

The congregation is responsible for advancing and founding God’s assertion in every road thus has for quite some time been the safeguard of these UN organization are underestimated and whose rights aren’t adored by God. In this manner, the Church is compelled to lift her voice and enter the migration exchange to help create a decent and basically movement framework for all. we tend to Catholics are known as to respect the nonnative, and to regard the law. predictable with the article from the Catholic vote, ‘despite everything we have a moral commitment to maintain every human individual’s nobility, anyway we tend to can’t deliver common issue; our blame lies each with US, as lay people to put the lessons of the Church without hesitation ANd to help advance a migration framework that edges the benefit of all’ (Immigration para. 1-6). Movement, as most open strategy issues, might involve sense and substantial Catholics differ exclusively with the appropriate responses. This makes natural and shrewd dialog essential. Our Bishops justifiedly set the prerequisites of genuine people at the focal point of their demand for change.
Topic: immigration

Transient staff, all through the late 2000s, have consistently contend a huge job inside the U.S. Movement to the u. s. establishes the world propensity of lower-class .S. A real development has been the numerous wellspring of individuals progression and social revision throughout the U.S. In America, workers have contend a fundamental job in becoming the U.S. organizations are as of now cost $1 billion or extra a few of those were built up by transients. Without a doubt, while most Americans trait their legacy and methods for life as a ‘nation of nonnatives’ (How America’s Identity Politics Went from Inclusion to Division para. 2-9) Nearly sixty million individuals, very 20% of the blend individuals of the u. s., are pilgrims or the posterity of staff. On the elective feature, there’s a noteworthy offer, a greater a piece of Americans UN organization are against a continuation of inside and out movement. The Catholic Catechism trains that reasonable administration has 2 undertakings. the essential assignment is to respect AN outsider out of fondness and regard for the individual. The second assignment is to anchor one’s fringe and to implement the law for the decent of the people. All countries are qualified for authorize their laws, and everyone should regard the genuine exercise of this right. In Gregorian timetable month 2003, the u. s. Gathering of Catholic Bishops issued a peaceful letter on movement, articulation ‘If people can’t understand work in their nation of origin to help themselves and their families, they require a privilege to seek out work somewhere else to endure. Sovereign countries should offer manners by which to oblige that right’ (‘Foreigners No Longer: along on the Journey of Hope’).
Topic: immigration

With recent increasing influx of illegal immigrants it has changed America for the better because, America’s image has been changed by immigrants, Americans view of illegal aliens, and what do aliens contribute to the workforce. For instance, how has the view of America been changed by immigrants and what is the image of the America now because of it? Reasoning behind this is that has the plethora of immigrants changed how America is viewed as a country like with the events that is occurring right now since America is dealing with the immigrant caravan trying to cross the border to America.
Topic: immigration

Another finding that the view of America has changed by the hoi polloi of illegal immigrants is that of W., Jonathon. “The Politics of Immigration: Introduction to a Special Issue on US …” that “This growing Latino influence challenges the status quo on several fronts.”Which states that not only Latino immigrants but others from other countries challenge status quos when their (the immigrants) numbers blossom as they can challenge how the government can work in the stance of that if they become active in politics they could change the government of the United States. Although that is true one must consider that most of the immigrants being illegal, they are considered a danger. Equally important is that why is “The America’s image has been changed by immigrants” it is imperative to discuss, with what was stated prior. What can one say that the statement that why is it important is that American has always been a country that was founded by illegal immigrants before the term was coined. Regardless, America and other countries that harbor illegal immigrants seem to affect their appearance to the public and based on the country’s response to the waves of immigrants their appearance does change for better or for worse. Additionally, one must consider that the nation itself is a land of illegal immigrants, so it would seem counter-productive to just state that the escalation of illegal immigrant that has come are just a bunch of middle aged men that are with the drug trade or are criminals that wish to enter are country.
Topic: immigration

On the contrary most are people that wish to seek a better life than the one that they left behind, almost like the first Americans, but they weren’t called illegal immigrants So, in turn the image of America has changed due to it is a land of immigrants but in the country’s life span it seems to have forgotten what made America, America and in turn of its absent mindedness it presumes that illegal immigrants are a threat to itself. Although one must take everything with a grain of salt in order to see it to believe it in this case, continue reading the following research or do some research of your own to see how The Americans image has been changed by immigrants. Well for starters from Massey and Douglas S. “The Truth about Undocumented Immigration.” they domention “Between 1986 and 2010 the United States effectively militarized its border with Mexico, increasing the size of the Border Patrol from 3,700 to 20,000 officers and expanding the budget by 23 times from $151 million to a whopping $3.5 billion annually.” Now with this we can see that with the influx of the mass amounts of illegal immigrants that come to America that the U.S. responds by fortifying the border, but what would that mean for the immigrants less of a chance on entering the country.. Reading the article further,one comes across this statement “ Politicians proclaim that militarizing the border reduces illegal immigration – and they want to spend more and more taxpayer money this way. But careful research shows that fortifying the border has led to unintended consequences”. Which would in turn imply that by expanding the U.S’s expense on the wall would be a waste rather than anything.
Topic: immigration

Another finding that was found was by Zong, Jie, et al. “Frequently Requested Statistics on Immigrants and Immigration in the United States.” Is in which they state “An estimated 11.4 million unauthorized immigrants resided in the United States as of January 2012 compared to 11.5 million in January 2011, according to the most recent estimates issued by the DHS Office of Immigration Statistics. These results suggest little to no change in the unauthorized immigrant population from 2011 to 2012.” Granted that the information is slightly out of date, one can’t deny the fact that the amount of illegal immigrants is a factor to play when it came to the U.S section in the last finding that the U.S wishes to respond to the illegal immigrants will build a wall and increased military force. Following up on what applications immigrants gives leads to the next topic what Americans views on illegal aliens. Well for starters looking at López, Bialik and Radford. “Key Findings about U.S. Immigrants.” at Pew Research Center, they state that “Overall, a majority of Americans have positive views about immigrants. Six-in-ten Americans (65%) say immigrants strengthen the country “because of their hard work and talents,” while just over a quarter (26%) say immigrants burden the country by taking jobs, housing and health care.” that in mind we can see that the mentality of that americans view the immigrants that come to America as a way to “strengthen the country” than be a burden. Don’t dismiss that 26% other it still means that there is a percent of americans that thing that they are a burden and are taking the american peoples homes, jobs, and health from them.
Topic: immigration

Another view that the american people have on the immigrants from Felter, Claire, and Danielle Renwick from their online article, “The U.S. Immigration Debate.” In the article the Council on Foreign Relations states that “ A 2017 Gallup poll found that 71 percent of Americans considered immigration a “good thing” for the United States. A year earlier, as many as 84 percent supported a path to citizenship for undocumented immigrants if they meet certain requirements. A separate Gallup poll found that among Republicans, support for a path to citizenship (76 percent) was higher than support for a proposed border wall (62 percent).” In which we can see from the polls gathered and provide results that still the american people view immigrants as a benefit to the nation. One can also see that they talked about a 62% support for a border which would mean that there is still a percent of Americans that disapprove of immigrant coming to America.
Topic: immigration

Although that’s maybe true in America its majority rule so in a sense the American people see immigrants in a acceptable way then in a negative way that some would think that Americans would view immigrants. Another finding was that of Robertson, Lori “Illegal Immigration Statistics.” they bring up the fact that “Illegal Immigration Undermines National Security While most illegal immigrants may come only to seek work and a better economic opportunity, their presence outside the law furnishes an opportunity for terrorists to blend into the same shadows while they target the American public for their terrorist crimes.” In which the americans of the U.S are fine with illegal immigrants coming for work reason they have the doubt that they could be hiding themselves as “terrorists”. But even so our own officials give off the same atmosphere in that they see immigrants as terrorists, narcos, or criminals that are going to bring negatives to the country then positives. In addition there was another finding by Schoen, John W. “Are Immigrants Bad for the U.S.?” that state “But the wave of immigration a century ago also brought to this country some of the most important contributors to American culture, science, business, education and health care, to mention a few.” with that in mind not all Americans view the immigrants as a danger but as a benefit as well.
Topic: immigration

to other nations that are ruled by corrupt Official and to the citizens they would rather leave then stay and head to this promise land of opportunity. But with the way that some of America’s officials wish to take the approach of the mass amounts of people, the officials would rather keep the illegal immigrant out. But compared to what they had to endure the immigrants would still try and enter America. Even with the idea that they will not be welcomed or not. Although one must consider that mainly the political side of the table on which other people would side on as stated from the research presented that the people of america is for the majority are accepting of the illegal immigrant but, there are always the few that speak out and has a negative approach to the topic.
Topic: immigration

Despite that, one must consider that the whole of America is a land an illegal immigrant that came here running away from tyranny, religious reasons, or for a better life that is what America is and has been it is just that America itself has forgotten what is is. However, the topic that illegal Immigrants are changing america for the better is true but their is alway backside to things. For instance, immigrants are changing America for the good but they are also changing America for the worse if not done with properly. Like what Orrenius, Pia states in their article “Benefits of Immigration Outweigh the Costs” about immigrants in the workforce, “it lowers the wages of competing workers, while raising the return to capital and the wages of complementary workers. In other words, the immigration surplus does not accrue equally to everyone.” in which case, whenever an illegal immigrant joins the workforce they seem to cause a shift in the wages of other workers when competing for work and with the “Immigration surplus” it is not helping the fact that Americans who are trying to get a job under normal circumstances will pay taxes to better the economy as in most cases illegal immigrants don’t pay taxes. Another instance of immigrants changing America for the worse is from Michael McDonald “Top 10 Pro & Con Arguments – Illegal Immigration – ProCon.org.” in which the author states in this section of the article“Immigrants on average tend to have larger families that those in the U.S. This difference can strain the resources of local school districts”.
Topic: immigration

That in mind think of how the U.S would hold out their resources if they are being consumed even quicker. Although, at the same time the U.S still doesn’t have enough resources to give to all of it pre-existing people causing a greater struggle for the immigrants just trying to live and the American citizens in America. Comparatively the next finding of the research is “What do aliens contribute to the workforce.” That seems to closely corresponds to what the other two findings seem to connect to in terms of when illegal immigrants come to america. Now what do immigrant do to the workforce well it is stated by Orrenius, Pia. “Benefits of Immigration Outweigh the Costs” that ‘When immigrants enter the labor force, they increase the productive capacity of the economy and raise GDP. Their incomes rise, but so do those of natives. It’s a phenomenon dubbed the “immigration surplus,”. That in mind consider that even if it was an American and not an immigrant and just the population of teenagers that massively just joined the workforce the productive capacity of the economy and GDP would still rise but not as much so with the illegal immigrants they boost not only nation’s economy but also provide an income rise for the Americans is a win-win situation.
Topic: immigration

Another point to be made is that of what Lisa Christensen Gee,Matthew Gardne and Meg Wiehe ‘Top 10 Pro & Con Arguments – Illegal Immigration” mentioned in their joint in which they stated ‘Undocumented immigrants contribute significantly to state and local taxes, collectively paying an estimated $11.64 billion a year”. That being said the influx of illegal immigrants has helped the U.S economy in bring an assist to the government state and local taxes. Which in turn would help the citizens of the U.S Another finging on how the illegal immigrants change the workforce is As is what Hanson, Gordon H. “The Economics and Policy of Illegal Immigration in the United States .” wrote “it redistributes income from low-skilled native workers to employers and it creates a net gain in national income by allowing employers to use their land, capital, and technology more productively. Economists refer to this net gain to the U.S economy as the immigration surplus. The size of the surplus depends on the productive potential of the arriving labor”.
Topic: immigration

That in mind that the U.S is using the immigrants for low-skilled labor to better the company’s means than to do it out of the benefit of the company’s heart to help the immigrants. But one must consider that the immigrants that come to this land take the jobs that people really don’t want to do but yet the common people will still shout and preach that the illegal immigrants are taking away jobs they are but mainly the jobs that americans don’t wish to do because they forget that those jobs need to be done and if the americans do not wish to do them then the immigrants with no skill that don’t mind the work will take the job. Equally important of discussing the topic of “What do aliens contribute to the workforce.” is to discuss what is the importance of the topic of why including it into the research as a finding. The reason why this finding was important is that this very topic is one of the main reasons people view the influx of illegal immigrants as a negative then a positive. The American people view the immigrants as when the immigrants do a job a american can do the american then takes offence in that the american is more deserving of the job then the immigrant. But all in all why don’t the American people take the jobs that the immigrants get then complain? The reason lays in that fact that Americans are aware that the low-income job will not pay enough to support them or their own expenses so the Americans would assume that some other Americans will take the job. Although in actuality the illegal immigrant that enters the country will take it being that they will work for set amount and the skills required for the job are not high.
Topic: immigration

So this is whyone would consider why the topic of “What do aliens contribute to the workforce.” as such an importance in which it shows that the americans don’t seem to wish to take the low-income jobs that require no skill but rather take jobs that, “Pay more”, show skill, and work environment. When the immigrants would rather not care and take whatever low-income job comes to live in America to live the “American dream” than from where they come from. All things considered the results of the research state that the results seem to show that the people of america seem to not really dislike the immigrants as much as they used to. Americans seem to accept them being that the immigrants help the economy and add more to America’s diversity, as America in itself is a nation that is made by and for immigrants. Some of the major findings of this research were that one would assume that a majority of Americans would not like immigrants in their county, but then again almost everyone in America is from a illegal immigrant past. Another is that with an increase of immigrants into the workforce is boosting the economy and raising the U.S GDP; which in turn helps all of the workers in America. Applications of this research would assist future research on the topic of illegal immigrants is illegal immigrants are not as portrayed as America would assume and in actuality help the U.S in the more ways than one.
Topic: immigration

Immigration in the United States has been around since the country’s creation. From the Puritans who left England to escape religious persecution, the Irish who left Ireland to escape the great famine, and now the people of Mexico who are leaving to escape a corrupt government and merciless drug cartels. When a country is having troubles, a lot of citizens from that country see the United States as their beacon of hope. While it seems like a black and white issue, either one is for immigration or one is against it, both sides of the political ideology spectrum have more in common than most people think.
Topic: immigration

are: “enforcing U.S. immigration law, securing our border, opposing amnesty, and implementing merit-based legal immigration reform.” (heritageaction.com) The last principle previously stated is the key to the compromise between FWD and Heritage Action. One of the ways this principle can happen is by allowing more highly skilled immigrants to come into the country with visas legally. The main problem with that is there aren’t enough to be given since there is currently a low limit of visas being given by the United States government. Both FWD and Heritage Action agree that there needs to be an increase in the limit; the common ground between these two groups is the H1-B Visa.
Topic: immigration

The H1-B visa, which provides a work visa for high skilled immigrants (uscis.gov), is the key to the compromise on immigration between the stakeholders. These groups both agree that the limit on these visas needs to be raised; one because it makes it easier for immigrants to come legally, and two, it gives the United States higher skilled workers, thus benefiting the national economy. With this agreement, a compromise can then begin to be made. According to Heritage, “raising the cap to 195,000 visas would increase revenues by a total of nearly $69 billion over eight years” (Nell and Sherk, heritage.com). FWD strongly agrees by quoting Eric Schmidt, former Google Executive Chairman, on their website saying, “I spent the last 20 years announcing that the single stupidest policy in the entire American political system was the limit on H-1B visas” (fwd.us). Raising the visa caps, especially H-1B visas, will benefit the economy not just money wise, but bringing the greatest minds from around the world into the United States will bring amazing advancements and innovations that would benefit everyone.
Topic: immigration

, fee and a pathway to citizenship for law-abiding undocumented immigrants, and increased number of visas), both groups should come together and agree publicly that this is the best way of solving our immigration problem. In doing so, it will show that both sides of the political spectrum can come together on an issue to benefit not only Americans, but anyone else who wishes to one day call themselves an American as well. They should both continue in their avenue of activism by giving huge amounts of money into politicians who agree with this immigration plan, putting people on the streets with signs and posters supporting this plan, and continue to gain the American people’s support. Both stakeholders aren’t giving up much. A lot of people believe that the American Immigration system is forever broken. Usually this is due to the intense gridlock in a partisan government which only leads to nothing being achieved. However, if these groups can show everybody that it doesn’t matter what side of the fight you’re on, America can finally fix their broken immigration system once and for all.
Topic: immigration

Around two months ago, Jane Yue-Chi Hwang told me the story of her and her family’s immigration from Taipei, Taiwan to the Birmingham, Alabama. Her story was extremely interesting and included Jane’s recollections of her unique experiences in addition to those experiences that are shared by many other Asian immigrants. In this paper, I will analyze the major push and the major pull factor that prompted Jane and her family, as well as many other Asian immigrants, to immigrate into the United States.
Topic: immigration

Taiwan’s political instability had multiple frightening consequences, with one of the most terrifying being the fear of an invasion. After what was called the 228 Incident, the Taiwanese people’s perception of Taiwan as a politically unstable country grew significantly. Because of their common languages and similar ancestral ethnic backgrounds, Taiwan and the Taiwanese people had always considered China to be a “mother country” and an ally that Taiwan could rely on. Because China was such a large and established country, being able to rely on China gave Taiwan, which was small country with little power at the time, a sense of political stability and protection against threat.
Topic: immigration

This incident began on the morning of February 27th, 1947, when Chinese agents beat a woman to death for selling smuggled cigarettes on the street. The Taiwanese people responded to the excessive and extreme cruelty of this incident with a series of protests and riots. In an attempt to control the situation, leaders of the Chinese Nationalist Party, or the KMT, sent Chinese troops to exert military control over Taiwan. During this period of military control, individuals who had participated in the riots and rebellions were arrested and killed. In addition, many laborers, social elite, intellectuals, and thousands other people were arrested and killed without reason. In total, over 10,000 people were killed during the 228 Incident (Shiao-Feng, 2004).
Topic: immigration

After this incident, China aggressively attempted to take absolute control over Taiwan with the “One China” policy, which stated that both Taiwan and mainland China were parts of China, discouraging and falsifying a separate Taiwanese national identity. After China’s claiming of Taiwan with this policy, many Taiwanese residents began to perceive the Chinese Nationalist Party as a major occupying force to be feared, and the feeling of terror began to grow in Taiwan. As Taiwan slowly began to lose its independence to China, its space in the United Nations was also threatened. Soon the question of whether Beijing was a better representative of China than Taiwan arose, and if this motion was passed by a two thirds vote, Beijing would take Taiwan’s place in the United Nations. Taiwan, instead of facing the humility of expulsion from the United Nations, chose to withdraw from the United Nations in 1971. After the withdrawal, China insisted that Taiwan had no legal right to establish diplomatic relations with other countries. This caused many countries to end their relations and allyship with Taiwan, and the number of Taiwan’s allies dropped significantly in the 1970s and 1980s (Chang and Wang, 2005). Taiwan’s withdrawal from the United Nations not only put greater power in the hands of China to control Taiwan, but also incited the idea in the Taiwanese people that their country was weak and incapable of surviving on its own. The growing perception of Taiwan as a weak country provoked fear in the Taiwanese people of the vulnerability of their own country. Not wanting to risk the consequences of an attack or other tragedy, this fear pushed Jane and many other Taiwanese people to immigrate out of Taiwan in search of a more politically stable country.
Topic: immigration

After leaving Taiwan, the major pull factor for Jane’s family and many other Taiwanese and Asian immigrants into the United States was the promise of opportunity, the “American dream,” and a better quality of living in the United States. Historically, the promise of opportunity and the availability of work has always been a pull factor for multiple generations of Asian immigrants, including Chinese immigrants to the United States during the California gold rush. The promise of gold and employment opportunities lured Chinese immigrants to the United States, where laborers could make ten times the amount that they did in China. Many Chinese immigrants, intrigued by this opportunity, migrated to the United States voluntarily as free labor (Takaki, 1993). In the 1970s, these same promises of wealth and opportunity attracted Taiwanese immigrants to the United States. Although the economic state of the United States was not at its peak during the 1970s, the glamorization of the American Dream and the promise of the “freedom to succeed” was heavily marketed to immigrants. A 1970s advertisement featured the smiling faces of people of many different ethnicities and multiple words of opportunity, such as “The will to succeed is part of the American spirit.” (Hochschild, 1995). The image of the United States that was created displayed a utopia that was nonexistent anywhere else in the world, and this perfect image was massively appealing to both Chinese immigrants during the California gold rush, as well as to Taiwanese immigrants to the United States during the 1970s.
Topic: immigration

For many years, Asian immigrants rushed to the United States in the hopes of attaining the prosperity associated with the American Dream. However, Asian immigration has not always been welcome in the United States, and the treatment of Asian immigrants has both reproduced and challenged racial structures in the United States. After the large influx of Chinese immigrants during the time of the California gold rush, many white workers feared that their “entitled” employment opportunities were being taken by Chinese laborers. This led to violent riots in which unemployed white workers shot and beat Chinese workers. After being faced with backlash from white workers for hiring large numbers of Chinese workers, corporations and businessmen such as Charles Crocker attempted to justify their use of Chinese labor by claiming that Chinese labor was “cheap labor,” and that this cheap labor should not be performed by white Americans. They claimed that the use of Chinese laborers to do excruciating work, especially on the Central Pacific Railroad, is “elevating instead of degrading” and would ultimately“upgrade” the status white labor and white workers. The status of Chinese people was thus assigned to a racially inferior, “subservient laboring class” that also included other nonwhite people in the United States (Takaki, 1993).
Topic: immigration

The immediate grouping of Chinese people, into this class of the nonwhite other can be explained through the framework of Haney-Lopez (2006) in “White by Law.” Haney-Lopez notes what is called the transparency phenomenon, in which, when assigning racial classification, white people do not think of what is considered white, but instead what is considered non white or “other.” Especially in legal settings, whiteness was only defined to go as far as what the “average informed American knew to be White” (Haney-Lopez, 2006). The ambiguity of this classification led to the grouping of all people of color into one large “non-white” category. The failure to distinguish the groups within this non-white category upheld the existing black-white binary structure within the United States. The assignment of the non-white Asian immigrant group to a lower status continued the racial structure of the inferiority and discrimination against people of color in the United States.
Topic: immigration

Although there was a time when the immigration of Asians into the United States reproduced and continued the existing racial structure of the United States, there has been evidence in recent years that Asian immigration is actually challenging and restructuring the existing bilateral racial structure of the United States. This structure is being challenged with the assignment of a “model minority” status to Asian Americans. This model minority status assigns higher educational and employment standards to Asian Americans, and in the process of doing so also blames other communities of color for failing to “match the achievement levels” of Asian Americans. The creation of the model minority was supported by the passing of the Hart-Cellar Act of 1965, which changed the priorities of United States immigration to value employment and education over national origin and race. The Hart-Cellar Act drew on the potential for Asian students, skilled workers, and technical trainees to obtain legal citizenship and ultimately enhance the national economy (Hsu, 2015). The cultural and legal supporting of placing a model minority status on Asian Americans due to their perceived abundance of valuable skills, especially within the science, technology, engineering, and mathematical skills gave Asian immigrants an elevated status in the eyes of white Americans.
Topic: immigration

The creation of Asian Americans as the model minority demonstrates how in recent years, Asian immigration has challenged and transformed the existing structures of race in the United States. In “The Unbearable Whiteness of Being,” Omi (1998) draws upon social and economic indicators to argue that Asian Americans have reached a “white status” and have thus distanced themselves from other groups of color. Omi compares the assimilation status of Asian Americans to that of European immigrants, claiming that Asian Americans are moving towards an expanding definition of whiteness. However, the minority model stereotype that is assigned to all Asian Americans also employs many aspects of Haney-Lopez’s (2006) framework of the transparency phenomenon. Similar to how all non white groups of color were put into the category of the “other” during the rapid Chinese immigration period discussed above, the grouping of all Asian Americans into the category of the model minority ignores the socioeconomic discrepancies between different Asian ethnic groups. These socioeconomic discrepancies are crucial, as the assignment of a model minority status, which implies many stereotypes that indicate high economic and academic achievement, is inaccurate and harmful to the many Asian ethnic groups in the United States that are marred by poverty (Omi, 1998).
Topic: immigration

Through the process of looking back at Jane Hwang’s immigration narrative and investigating the major push and major pull factor that incited Jane and her family’s immigration to the United States, I have connected Jane’s specific experiences with immigration and experiences that are shared within the Asian immigrant community, both historically and in the modern day. This process has also revealed the many cultural, and specifically racial structures that have existed in the United States that have been influenced by Asian immigration. These structures have changed significantly over time with Asian immigration, and have shown evidence of transformation in modern times.
Topic: immigration

The effects of Hurricane Katrina that swept through the New Orleans State in August 2005 were devastating. Statistics show that more than 1. 5 million people were displaced by the hurricane (Sandhyarani, 2010). In addition more than 1,800 people lost their lives. The property damage caused by the hurricane was estimated to be more than US$96 million dollars. After the hurricane, many people opted to migrate from New Orleans due to several factors. There are five main push and pull factors that contributed to this immigration.
Topic: immigration

Environmental factors: As a result of the hurricane, many residence of New Orleans opted to migrate to other locations. Many feared that there may be a reoccurrence of the hurricane and therefore they decided to look for a new location that has different environmental / weather conditions (Sandhyarani, 2010). Another factor that led to the immigration from New Orleans after the hurricane is the economic factor. Many business and offices were destroyed by the hurricane as a result many of the residents were rendered jobless and without a source of living.
Topic: immigration

Therefore most residents chose to move to another towns and cities in order to try and secure employment and be able to earn a decent living (Sandhyarani, 2010). Political factors greatly contributed to the immigration from New Orleans. The residents felt that the Bush administration neglected them during the hurricane; they felt that the rescue response was slow and discriminative – most attention was given to the white residents than the blacks. For this reason, most black resident opted to move to areas where there is less discrimination from the government of the day and where they could get equal justice (Sandhyarani, 2010).
Topic: immigration

The decline in the living conditions, poor housing, lack of education, poor health care and other social amenities caused by the hurricane contributed to the immigration from New Orleans. As a social factor, many people decided to go to alternative town where they could access these basic facilities that they needed for their day to day living. The impact of the hurricane also had emotional effects on some of the residents, due to this factor therefore some people decided to move from New Orleans to new locations in order to be able to overcome the trauma, have emotional stability, peace and start life a fresh (Sandhyarani, 2010).
Topic: immigration

Although the above push and pull factors greatly contributed to the immigration from New Orleans, there were some hindrances to the whole process. These factors included emotional, financial, legal, political and physical factors. 2. Question: Explain the difference between the primary, secondary, tertiary, and quaternary sectors of employment to someone in Junior High (7th and 8th grade, for example). How would you differentiate them? What sorts of jobs would fall into each category? Which job category do most Americans fall into?
Topic: immigration

Which category is going to be the “hot job” of the future put into, and why? In most American states, kids who attend junior high which is also referred to as middle school are between the ages of 11 and 14 years. At this stage, most kids are in the early stages of adolescents and therefore great care is needed when explaining to the kids the different aspects of life. When it comes to explaining the difference between the four major categories of employment, the use of relevant examples as a teaching aid is recommended. This will help the kids be able to understand the concept faster.
Topic: immigration

Primary employment is the lowest of the four categories (Kenessey, 2005), the jobs that fall under this category include; fishing, agriculture, forestry and mining. These are jobs that require minimal education. It is then followed by secondary employment, which mainly covers the areas of construction and manufacturing (Kenessey, 2005). The workers in this sector vary, there are those who have specialized training (engineers, designers and technicians) and those who have minimal education. Kenessey (2005) explains that the third category is the tertiary category.
Topic: immigration

The category covers employees in the fields of transport, retail trade as well as entertainment and food industry. Most of the employees in this category have average level of education although the sector does not pay very well. The final category is the quaternary category (Kenessey, 2005). This sector is also known as “white collar jobs’ sector”. It attracts high salary packages and allowances and the level of education required to secure such jobs is higher diploma, degree or masters’ degree. It covers the areas of banking, insurance, finance, education, public administration, and telecommunication and information technology fields.
Topic: immigration

Most Americans fall in the last category, the quaternary sector (Kenessey, 2005). The high level of academic qualifications set by various employers has made most Americans acquire higher diplomas and degrees in order to secure employment. As a result this has helped in the nation’s economic growth and development especially in the fields of information technology, science and telecommunication. The quaternary category is the one that is destined to attract more Americans for future employment; this is because of the new innovations and technologies that are being witnessed in the country. 3.
Topic: immigration

Question: Explain why the Earth’s population is rising so rapidly. A good answer will explain the four pieces of the Demographic Transition Model and how Demographic Momentum affects population growth, as well as explain why population changes as regionally as it is currently (for example, one some areas are experiencing population booms; others are declining in population). According to the UN (1999), the world’s population as at 1999 was estimated to be six billion. However by 2050 the population is expected to reach 8. 91 billion. The 21st Century has also witnessed the fastest population increase from 1.
Topic: immigration

65 billion to 6 billion; this reflects an annual population growth of 2% (UN 1999). On the same breath also there has been a steady but stable decline in the annual population growth from the 1960’s to date –2% in the 1960’s to the current 1. 5% per annum. This has been caused by a number of factors. Infertily is the one of the main reason. It is estimated that more than 50% of women in developed countries use contraceptives and this has slowed down the birth rate. The HIV/AIDS pandemic has greatly affected the population growth especially in Africa and Eastern Europe where it has been hard to control.