# Talk:The Conquest of Belgrade

This review is transcluded from Talk:The Conquest of Belgrade/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Sainsf (talk · contribs) 17:52, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Hi! Happy to review. Sainsf <^>Feel at home 17:52, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
A beautiful article. Here are my comments:

Lead:
As per WP:MOSLEAD I think it's best to keep only one translation of the name in the lead. Both translated names can go to the info box.
one art historian Can we know who?
At places you say 1844-45, elsewhere you say 1812-1872. Consistency would be good.
Article:
Say either Romantic or romantic.
No copyvio issues, images properly licensed. The above points addressed I would be happy to promote this. Sainsf <^>Feel at home 15:26, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

All done, but I can't see where it says 1812-1872 for the life of me. Please help me out. Thanks, 23 editor (talk) 17:02, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
@23 editor: I found this and another instance in Background. Sainsf <^>Feel at home 17:22, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
Ok, I see what you mean. I've removed it as off-topic. I thought you were saying the article mentioned the painting as being dated 1812-72. 23 editor (talk) 17:25, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
Thank you, I believe this is ready for promotion. Great job! Sainsf <^>Feel at home 17:31, 25 April 2016 (UTC)