# Talk:Tropical Storm Arlene (1959)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Tropical Storm Arlene (1959)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Hi!  I will be reviewing this article for GA status, and should have the full review up soon. Dana boomer (talk) 19:14, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose):  b (MoS): 
In the second paragraph of the lead, you say "Arlene dropped heavy rains totaling up to as it moved"  I think you're missing a number here...
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 

It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 

It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars etc.: 

It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 

Overall:
Pass/Fail: 

One tiny little issue with some missing info in a sentence, and the article will be good to go for GA.  I'm placing the article on hold until this issue can be fixed.  Drop me a note here or on my talk page if you have any questions. Dana boomer (talk) 19:35, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

Ok, I've added that it totaled over two feet in localized areas. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 19:40, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
Everything looks good, so I'm going to pass the article.  Nice job! Dana boomer (talk) 19:59, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
Thanks :) Cyclonebiskit (talk) 20:00, 13 October 2008 (UTC)