# Talk:Port of Ploče

This review is transcluded from Talk:Port of Ploče/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Tea with toast (talk · contribs) 07:45, 3 December 2011 (UTC)


### Review update
I have nearly finished with my review, and am thus far satisfied with what I have read. The only problem is a potential one with the references. It appears that for all the references that link to the luka-ploce.hr website the connections all time out. Perhaps the website moved or was reorganized? Would you be able to investigate this? Thanks. --Tea with toast (話) 02:51, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

I just ran Checklinks and all links are reported as good (code 200, white background). Perhaps that server was down for some reason at the time. Could you please run Checklinks again?--Tomobe03 (talk) 08:55, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
Yes, they are fine now. It must have just been a server issue. --Tea with toast (話) 01:55, 6 December 2011 (UTC)


### Final review
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality: 

B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists: 

Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources: 

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary: 

C. No original research: 

Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects: 

B. Focused: 

Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias: 

Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc: 

Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales: 

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions: 

Overall:
Pass or Fail: 
I can't think of anything else you might do to improve the article, everything looks fine. Good work! --Tea with toast (話) 01:55, 6 December 2011 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Port of Ploče. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120121044905/http://www.port-authority-ploce.hr/html/eng/capacities.asp to http://www.port-authority-ploce.hr/html/eng/capacities.asp
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110902234646/http://www.agencija-zolpp.hr/Brodskelinije/tabid/1267/Default.aspx to http://www.agencija-zolpp.hr/Brodskelinije/tabid/1267/Default.aspx
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110721100545/http://www.hrvatske-ceste.hr/WEB%20-%20Legislativa/brojenje-prometa/CroDig2009.pdf to http://www.hrvatske-ceste.hr/WEB%20-%20Legislativa/brojenje-prometa/CroDig2009.pdf
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.nacional.hr/clanak/39118/krecemo-u-gradnju-nove-luke-ploce
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110815055054/http://www.port-authority-ploce.hr/index_eng.asp to http://www.port-authority-ploce.hr/index_eng.asp
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:57, 22 May 2017 (UTC)