# Talk:The Tempest (album)

This review is transcluded from Talk:The Tempest (album)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: GreatOrangePumpkin (talk · contribs) 15:53, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
yes. 

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose):  b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): 

It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 
How reliable is thuglifearmy (This is a fan based site...)?
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 

It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 

It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 

Overall:
Pass/Fail: 

Dabsolver check: one dab solved (unlinked "giant" as common word)
Checklinks check: ok

This article doesn't even meet "C" class criteria for the album Wikiproject. To meet "C" class, an album article needs a list of performers. To met "B" class, it needs a list of performers and technical personnel. See Wikipedia:WikiProject Albums/Assessment. This would meet the "start" class assessment of that project. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 20:16, 8 December 2011 (UTC)