# Talk:Shantae (video game)

According to TASVideos, "Shantae (...) recognizes whether it is running on a GBA, and utilizes GBA's hardware features if available." This sounds very interesting, but it isn't mentioned in the article. Does anyone know something about this? 85.233.38.96 (talk) 14:57, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Shantae (video game)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 22:34, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

I'll finish this soon. JAGUAR  22:34, 2 January 2016 (UTC)


### Initial comments
The second sentence in the first paragraph of the lead is too long. I'd split it in half where "with a fourth entry" begins
"and acquires items which make her progressively stronger and unlock new abilities and locations" - as well as unlocking
"even if it did show support for the new handheld, as special features are available when played on a Game Boy Advance" - informal
Can the comparability with the Game Boy Advanced be elaborated in the lead?
"the game received favourable reviews and has garnered recognition since its release, being ranked among the best games on the platform" - did critics officially state this?
"Shantae is a platform adventure game" - link platform game and adventure game
"adventure game in which players play as the eponymous Shantae" - comma needed in between "adventure" and "game"
No gameplay image?
"After, she's magically abducted to a place called the Genie Realm" - she is
"the game was planned for the Super NES or PC" - SNES?
"alongside the fact that launching a new IP was considered risky" - elaborate IP
"and the Game Boy Advance was released in the meantime" - informal
"The sound was, by 2000, developed in Musyx audio format" - The sound was developed in 2000
"WayForward Technologies never actually released sales figures for the game, but the game's creator Matt Bozon acknowledges it has sold poorly" - informal and not encyclopaedic
The first paragraph of the Sales and analysis section is informal and unsourced
GamesRadar shouldn't be italicised


### On hold
The things that worry me most are fears of original research and the informality of most sentences in the article. Some of it needs a copyedit and if you get stuck I'd recommend asking some people at WP:VG, as they'll know what I'm on about. I'll leave this on hold for seven days.  JAGUAR  22:18, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

@Jaguar: I think I have fixed everything you pointed out in your initial set of comments.--IDVtalk 22:52, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
Thanks! OK, with them all out of the way I'd say this article has improved a great deal and should meet the GA criteria. Good work, IDV.  JAGUAR  22:58, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
Thanks IDV for taking care of this while I was away. Glad the article passed.88.182.48.88 (talk) 08:56, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Shantae. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.wayforward.com/Shantae.htm
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.gamespot.com/reviews/shantae-review/1900-2871650/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 13:15, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Shantae (series) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RMCD bot 00:46, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

Just to be clear, the issue with "emulated versions" is when they are released as one of many for a standard emulator, such as the Virtual Console (which is why the 3DS release isn't in the infobox). This game, however, is not that -- it's a port using an emulator as its base. As I said in my edit summery, there are many, MANY games that are like this. Also, the fact that there's a physical release should be considered, even if in general anything emulated were to get a pass. ♫ Melodia Chaconne ♫ (talk) 05:23, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

The game itself was never ported, it's just a modified ROM. And the emulator is not part of the game. This is the reason why there can be commercial re-releases of DOS games on digital stores (and even physical releases) using DOSBox without requiring disclosure of the source code for the actual game that it's being sold. --Lugamo94 (talk) 05:54, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
There is precedent for this via the Wii version of Super Mario All-Stars. If that, a featured article, has no issues treating the Wii version as a separate release, I don't see how this doesn't qualify either. -- Cyberlink420 (talk) 13:59, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
Good point. I still think that it's a contradiction (since it's essentially the same thing as a regular Virtual Console release, the game it's not running natively in the new platform), but I won't remove the emulated Switch release from the Infobox (and the category) anymore. --Lugamo94 (talk) 15:05, 27 April 2021 (UTC)