# Talk:Robert of Bath

This review is transcluded from Talk:Robert of Bath/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Buidhe (talk · contribs) 02:56, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, spelling, and grammar):  b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): 
Prose comments below
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):  d (copyvio and plagiarism): 
I checked some of the references and found no issues with verifiability or plagiarism.
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 

It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 

It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 
No images, presumably because none are available
Overall:
Pass/Fail: 
Just two minor comments below, otherwise it definitely meets the GA criteria. (t · c) buidhe 03:06, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
"He was the bishop that organized the archdeacons of the diocese on a territorial basis." does that mean he reorganized the archdeacons to operate on a territorial basis? If so, this could be more clear
Let's try "He was the bishop that set up the territorial organization of the archdeacons of the diocese." Is that better? Ealdgyth (talk) 13:12, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
"Robert also built at Bath" what does this mean?
Is "Robert continued the building work on church building at Bath," better? Ealdgyth (talk) 13:12, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
(t · c) buidhe 03:06, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Buidhe just checking in... Ealdgyth (talk) 16:29, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
Sorry, I managed to miss your comments. I am satisfied and will pass it now. (t · c) buidhe 23:02, 31 January 2021 (UTC)