# Talk:San Marino in the Eurovision Song Contest 2022

67 artists are in bold, while only 66 qualified and I can't manage to find the one that shouldn't be. Also, the link to the "convocations" has already been changed so it an archive may be needed. Thank you Yoyo360 (talk) 14:37, 4 March 2022 (UTC)

Addressed. Grk1011 (talk) 18:05, 10 August 2022 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:San Marino in the Eurovision Song Contest 2022/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: The C of E (talk · contribs) 08:46, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

I'll review over the next few days.  The C of E  God Save the King! (talk) 08:46, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Hi @The C of E: checking in just in case you forgot about this. No rush. Grk1011 (talk) 16:37, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Are there any links for the writers in the opening paragraph?
Added two interlanguage links. Grk1011 (talk) 15:57, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
Can we link the years for the 3 consecutive Austrian performances, for consistency
Done. Grk1011 (talk) 15:57, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
Any subsequent reasons why the emerging acts were absent?
None of the available sources explained why. Grk1011 (talk) 15:57, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
Was there any subsequent punishment for the jury scandal beyond using aggregate scores?
It seems the aggregate scores were the only penalty based on the available sources. Grk1011 (talk) 15:57, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
Is ESCToday a print source? IF not, it shouldn't be in WP:ITALICS
Same for Eurovoix
Done. Grk1011 (talk) 15:57, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
There are multiple WP:BLUE links for SMRTV in the references
This is ok per MOS:REPEATLINK. Citations are not read in order of appearance. Grk1011 (talk) 15:57, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
Sources 17, 37 and 54, i'm not sure WikiBlogs is an WP:RS
This is reliable source that just so happens to have blog in its name. The site lists their editorial policies, key staff and their credentials, significance in the field, etc. [1], [2]. Grk1011 (talk) 15:57, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
Source 55, Out is a print source and should be italicised
Done. Grk1011 (talk) 15:57, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
Source 56, Metro is considered generally unreliable under WP:RSP
Done. Grk1011 (talk) 15:57, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
@Grk1011: It looks more or less ready, just needs the above issues addressed and it should be ready. Feel free to ping me once they are done. Apologies for the delay.  The C of E  God Save the King! (talk) 06:58, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
@The C of E: Thank you for the review! I believe I've made all the requested edits, with comments above. Grk1011 (talk) 15:57, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
Indeed you have. I can pass this now. Well done!  The C of E  God Save the King! (talk) 21:52, 15 February 2023 (UTC)