# Talk:Robert F. Christy

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 10:03, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Robert F. Christy/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Seabuckthorn (talk · contribs) 23:02, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
Nominator: Hawkeye7 (talk)
Hi! My review for this article will be here shortly.  --Seabuckthorn ♥ 23:02, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

1: Well-written

a. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors: 
b. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists: 

2: Verifiable with no original research

a. Has an appropriate reference section:  Yes
b. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:  excellent (Thorough check on Google.)

c. No original research:   Done

3: Broad in its coverage

4: Neutral

5: Stable: No edit wars, etc:  Yes
6: Images  Done (PD)

As per the above checklist, there are no issues with the article and it’s a GA. The prose quality in particular is meticulous and engrossing. Thanks, Hawkeye7, very much for your conscientious contributions. 
Promoting the article to GA status.  --Seabuckthorn ♥ 23:46, 27 February 2014 (UTC)