# Talk:Rodeløkka Line

This review is transcluded from Talk:Rodeløkka Line/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: –Juliancolton | Talk 20:19, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
Looks good overall, but I did notice a few issues. 

The image caption in the infobox is confusing, and seems like it is perhaps missing a word.
Here, there was built as small depot with place for six cars. - Ditto.
I'm also a bit concerned that there are only two sources, but I suppose there's not much more you can do with such a brief article as this.
Putting this on-hold for now, although the above fixes should be easy. Nice work. –Juliancolton | Talk 20:19, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for taking the time for the review. I have fixed up the two sentences. Concerning the references, those are all that I have been able to find; it isn't a topic there has been written all that much about. Arsenikk (talk) 20:47, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
Alright then. Well done. –Juliancolton | Talk 20:52, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

This is a very nice article, and I've recently been adding some more refs to it, but I really think it should be split into two articles. The article deals with two different lines, sharing nothing but the terminus and the name. It would, in my opinion, be a good idea to split it into one article about the original line (Rodeløkka Line (1900–1949)) and one about the later branching of at Carl Berners plass (Rodeløkka Line (1955–1961). Eisfbnore talk 09:54, 9 December 2010 (UTC)

I see your point, and although a possibility, there is not much to say about the latter line. This is already a very short article, and I don't quite see the point in making two shorter ones. First of all, they did share a common section from Nybrua, so it isn't quite as bad as you suggest. In addition, they serve the same area, in other words they were in spirit the same line, even if they followed a different route. In comparison, we're not going to make a new article about the Vestfold Line once it [presumably] has been upgraded to high-speed, even though it would not follow the same right-of-way. Arsenikk (talk) 23:55, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
Ok, that rationale makes sense to me. BTW: I am for the moment working on Rodeløkka tram depot, but I do not have that much info about it, so I'd be very happy if you would add some more text from the LT article or Aspenberg's 1994 book to the article (if there is something more to add), Thanks. I guess that will be the first tiny tram shed to show up at GAN! ;) Eisfbnore talk 07:59, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
Haha, yes :) I'll have to wait till I go home for Christmas, as I've left my LT collection there. Arsenikk (talk) 11:51, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Rodeløkka Line. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20031018172327/http://www.sporveismuseet.no:80/museum/vh5_museumskatalogen_3.html to http://www.sporveismuseet.no/museum/vh5_museumskatalogen_3.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 22:04, 29 January 2016 (UTC)