# Talk:Q4 and Q51 buses

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 0 external links on Q4 (New York City bus). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.example.com/map.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:23, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Q4 (New York City bus). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20160319055221/http://web.mta.info/nyct/bus/schedule/queens/q004cur.pdf to http://web.mta.info/nyct/bus/schedule/queens/q004cur.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:18, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Q4 (New York City bus)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Courcelles (talk · contribs) 08:03, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

Opening for review. Courcelles (talk) 08:03, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
" The route run from"  runs
"In December 1923,[15] the route would be operated by Bee Line, Inc."  Why the future tense?
"On March 30, 1947, North Shore Bus would be taken over by the New York City Board of Transportation (later the New York City Transit Authority), making the bus routes city operated.[33][39][40][41][42]"  Is this point really so contentious it needs FIVE citations?
Ref 44 is a bare URL
Why is Ref 14 reliable?
Ref 42 is backwards in which of the fields is in italics
The author of ref 47 is not the New York Times, which is how it appears.
And that's all from me. Courcelles (talk) 08:11, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

I fixed all of these issues.--Kew Gardens 613 (talk) 13:53, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
Can now promote to GA, congratulations. Courcelles (talk) 16:36, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
@Courcelles and Kew Gardens 613: Thanks for taking up the review and resolving the issues so quickly during my absence. I appreciate it. epicgenius (talk) 04:06, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

The Q51 isn't a natural fit here. It is more similar to the former Q80 and Q9A/Q89 routes serving Linden Boulevard. @Epicgenius: What do you think? Kew Gardens 613 (talk) 19:57, 20 July 2025 (UTC)

@Kew Gardens 613, fair point. I figured that this would be an appropriate place to discuss Linden Boulevard buses, but if that's the case, would it be a good idea to include some info about the Q9A/old Q89 and the Q80 here as well? Or do you think we should pare back the Q51 info to just the bare minimum, rather than going into detail about it? – Epicgenius (talk) 04:11, 24 July 2025 (UTC)