# Talk:Soviet cruiser Krasny Krym

This review is transcluded from Talk:Soviet cruiser Krasnyi Krym/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Bernstein2291 (Talk • Contributions • Sign Here) 02:49, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose):  b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): 

It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 
What references does the second link in the Links section have?
It wouldn't load for me, so I just deleted it.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 03:37, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 
Is there any more information about its post WWII service?
No, and that's what's annoying. Even Russian-language sources don't have squat about its post-war service.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 03:37, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 

It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 

Overall:
Pass/Fail: 

Bernstein2291 (Talk • Contributions • Sign Here) 03:10, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for the review.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 03:37, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Considering that it's a thorough as it's ever going to be, I'm going to pass it. Bernstein2291 (Talk • Contributions • Sign Here) 03:59, 9 March 2011 (UTC)