# Talk:Tatwine

This review is transcluded from Talk:Tatwine/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Pyrotec (talk) 22:15, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

I will review. Pyrotec (talk) 22:15, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
I've added a couple, or so, of wikilinks since they help clarify technical terms. It was not worth adding them to a "problem list".
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

A short but well referenced article on a historical figure.
Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality: 

B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists: 

Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources: 
Well referenced.
B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary: 
Well referenced.
C. No original research: 

Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects: 

B. Focused: 

Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias: 

Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc: 

Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales: 
Not applicable: - no figures.
B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions: 
Not applicable: - no figures.
Overall:
Pass or Fail: 

I'm awarding this article GA-status. Congratulations on gaining another GA for an Archbishop/Saint. Pyrotec (talk) 12:30, 14 March 2011 (UTC)