# Talk:Scotland in the Middle Ages

This review is transcluded from Talk:Scotland in the Middle Ages/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Droodkin (talk · contribs) 22:27, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
Alright, I'll be starting the review. Since the article is a pretty long one, this is going to take a while so have patience. So let's get started! --Droodkin (talk) 22:27, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
Update: Okay, finished reading and here's the review.
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality: 

B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists: 
There are some personal pronouns (all of which are "we") which could pose a problem as per WP:TONE. However, in my view, it is acceptable (following WP:IAR.) Also, unnecessary capitalisations of words in mid-sentence (like "as an Artillery fort" in the Architecture section) are present.
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources: 
All links are working, no dead links. The article is sufficiently cited with books.
B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary: 

C. No original research: 

Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects: 

B. Focused: 
All major aspects that I expected were included.
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias: 
No bias, as far as I can see. It's neutral.
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc: 

Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content: 

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions: 
Choice of images are good and relevant to their respective sections.
Overall:
Pass or Fail: 
This article passes the requirements for WP:GA, congratulations.
--Droodkin (talk) 12:39, 26 August 2012 (UTC)

Came across this recently: It was as if, in the words of James Campbell, the leading historian of the Anglo-Saxon state, “there are two Englands and one of them is called Scotland.”
What he meant is that both medieval kingdoms had a Norman aristocracy, a predominantly Anglo-Saxon 'English' population and a Celtic fringe (the Welsh and the Cornish in England and the Highlanders, the original ethnic Scots, in Scotland).
One of the oddest features of this period of Scottish history is that the 
people who originally called themselves English began to call themselves Scots, and began calling the actual Scots of the Highlands 'Irish'.
The observation that lowland Scots are in the main of Anglo-Saxon rather than Celtic descent seems to be commonly downplayed today. Cassandra

The quote isn't really about ethnic essentialism, he means that the Scottish state came to resemble England so much in terms of institutions that it can be called a second England. The idea is not downplayed at all, the trajectory of Scottish historiography since the 1740s has been to present Scottish history in English terms, and indeed the careers of many of the most prominent recent medievalists of Scotland like Geoffrey Barrow and Sandy Grant have been dedicated to writing about medieval, post-1100 Scotland, as if it were a second England (albeit one with leftover 'Celtic' quirks). Deacon of Pndapetzim (Talk) 22:50, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
Well, I can't be certain exactly what James Campbell intended to mean. The point I was making however is that whilst England takes its name from being  the 'land of the Angles' Scotland wasn't the 'land of the Scots' in the same way at all. The name is more an accident of history, and a permanent source of confusion. The pivotal moment came at the time of King David who was nominally King of the Scots but whose kingdom was in reality based not in 'Scotland proper' i.e.the Highlands but in the English lands of what later became known as the 'Scottish ' Lowlands. David's writ barely ran in 'Scotland Proper'. In effect the Kingdom of the King of the Scots was and remained a northern English kingdom - only later did the whole become known as Scotland. Cassandra Cassandrathesceptic (talk) 14:05, 25 November 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Scotland in the Middle Ages. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130916085046/http://www.nas.gov.uk/about/051124.asp to http://www.nas.gov.uk/about/051124.asp
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121109055700/http://www.flaginstitute.org/images/page10_large.gif to http://www.flaginstitute.org/images/page10_large.gif
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:17, 19 January 2018 (UTC)