# Talk:Sooryavanshi

Cast:
Vivan Bhatena
To
Vivan Bhatena as Inspector Manav Patil Ayushbamb (talk) 01:29, 21 June 2020 (UTC)

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Tolly4bolly 02:25, 21 June 2020 (UTC)

122.181.95.24 (talk) 12:35, 8 July 2021 (UTC)

We want want to update the movie sooryavanshi in netflix on 15th August

Who is we? What is your source for this information? BOVINEBOY2008 14:32, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 15:36, 8 July 2021 (UTC)

2409:4042:D05:F6B8:CC14:230A:52B0:BB3E (talk) 17:28, 27 October 2021 (UTC)

CO BRANDING SPONSORS OF MOVIE Sooryavanshi ARE PRINCE PIPES AND FITTINGS.

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 17:44, 27 October 2021 (UTC)

Please make pav dharias name taken to a source 112.213.214.166 (talk) 04:00, 7 November 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate.  —twotwofourtysix(My talk page and contributions) 06:06, 7 November 2021 (UTC)

The budget is currently sourced to [1].  That is NOT part of the main Pinkvilla site and does not have editorial oversight, it's basically just WP:UGC, meaning not a reliable source.  Pinkvilla isn't the best quality source anyway.  So, better sources for the budget anyone? Ravensfire (talk) 15:51, 12 November 2021 (UTC)

I've removed the budget entirely as it's sourced to WP:UGC.  Also, note there are concerns about Pinkvilla (see Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_355#Pinkvilla,_Meaww_&_Bollywood_Life) and that it is listed on the WP:ICTFSOURCES sources to avoid. Ravensfire (talk) 22:25, 12 November 2021 (UTC)

A part of the plot is incorrect and can be explained in much more detail.
I would like to edit this page Tanay010 (talk) 08:59, 21 November 2021 (UTC)

Movie promotes hate between humans and is having Islamophobic content receiving backlash from US and Pakistani media. There is a need of adding this to the article with Rana ayub article as reference.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 39.32.255.120 (talk) 16:18, 22 November 2021 (UTC) 
After the Movie got released, It has hit the box office to be the one of the best selling movies,An writer named Rana Ayyubi wrote on The Washington Posts.
.Song-Gu (talk) 17:53, 17 December 2021 (UTC)

I would like to add some things to the plot of Sooryavanshi and remove some inaccuracies 43.254.212.78 (talk) 05:59, 27 November 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Cannolis (talk) 06:22, 27 November 2021 (UTC)

Somebody put this template in the plot section:

According to WP:FILMPLOT, plot section of movies shouldn't exceed more than 700 words. The plot section is between 500-600 words. I don't know whoever thought of putting this template. We are the Great (talk) 02:29, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Sooryavanshi/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Kpddg (talk · contribs) 13:37, 17 December 2021 (UTC)

Review Start Hello @ D'SuperHero. I will review this article over the coming days. Please contact me for any problems. Thank You. Kpddg (talk) 13:37, 17 December 2021 (UTC)


### Observations
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, spelling, and grammar):  b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): 
Article is very well-written; no grammatical errors. I made a few minor changes and corrections. Otherwise, it is fine.
However, one point of improvement I feel is that the last section (Critical Response), can be improved. While the content is good, it is all grouped in one big paragraph. I have tried to improve it, but more inputs are welcome.

It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):  d (copyvio and plagiarism): 
Article is backed by 81 accurate, reliable sources. All are working as of now.

It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 
Covers all important aspects; infobox is informative. 'Critical Response' section includes reviews from many sources. Article is broad in its coverage.

It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 
Includes mixed reviews about the movie. Both positive and negative aspects. No indication of any bias. Written from a neutral point of view.

It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 
Page statistics:
     Page created: 5th April, 2019
     
     Page has 2296 edits by 832 editors as of now (Kpddg (talk) 16:57, 18 December 2021 (UTC))
     
     979 249 page views in past 30 days
     
     Majority of edits are in good faith. No recent vandaism or edit wars. Article has been semi-protected as it is about a celebrated movie. This has 
     reduced cases of vandalism. 
     

It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 
File:Sooryavanshi film poster.jpg = Copyright photo, complies with Wikipedia policies, fair use under United States copyright law, and image is clear and of good quality

Overall:
● Most of the article is well-written and clear. There were a few grammatical errors, sentence errors, etc. But I have fixed most of them. Please do continue to improve.
● I have also improved the 'Critical Response' section as much as I could. Please do improve.
● Sources are accurate
● No frequent vandalism
According to my assessment, this article  passes.
Pass: 

I am able to see over-linking in multiple sections of this article, especially lead section require cleanup per MOS:LEADLINK. Kalu Dada from Thathri Kutty (talk) 15:38, 19 December 2021 (UTC)

I think the article is biased, in the sense that it appears to be a mostly positive overview of the film. The Critical response section in particular does not seem to reflect 'critical' response. While the positive reviews have been added here, the somewhat negative reviews have been added such that they also praise some of the film's aspects like in the case of the review on The Hindu or Hindustan Times, or the criticisms haven't been mentioned in as much detail as the fairly positive ones are described. I see several sentences from positive reviews being mentioned (like the one from Times of India and Rediff but the relatively critical reviews being given lesser space.
It's almost funny to see that a review which gives 2.5 out of 5 stars is mentioned such that only the part which talks about the only fun scene in the movie is mentioned here! and not the part about the poor writing or weak portrayal of character's personal life, or "terrible" handling of emotions by the filmmaker, or the part about the actress who "sounds awful while delivering the bland dialogues". I mention these because I think the editor who copied the paras from various websites did not really put a lot of effort and simply picked up whatever was written in the first few lines of the review.
In light of this, Kpddg, I want to ask as to why the edit I made was almost removed in its entirety since I think it balances the section by not only being more critical about the film, but also discussing the humour, the songs and the actress (who is not discussed here at all!) and placing the film in a larger political setting. While I understand that the section has already dealt with targetting of "a particular group", I think the New York Times review would be a welcome addition. I also do not understand why the comparison with films of Nazi Germany was removed by you. Kindly discuss this when you have time. --Indianite (talk) 22:28, 23 December 2021 (UTC)

@Indianite I feel that enough has been said about both the positive and negative aspects of this film.  But if you feel otherwise, please do go ahead as you have done. However, comparing the film to 'Nazi Germany' is too harsh. Also consider that the reviewer writing this statement seems to be biased (the way I see it). So please go ahead, but I suggest you remove the 'Nazi Gearmany' part. Thank You. Kpddg (talk) 08:09, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
Any particular reason why you think this specific part should be removed? From what I can see, this hasn't been mentioned by any of the other reviewers. While one can question its veracity, it is obviously a big statement. Indianite (talk) 15:54, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
This edit of yours here is simply WP:DUE. Firstly that is an oped by Ayyub not a review but I can see value in having it as a reference for Islamophobic tropes/stereotypes/negative portrayals. But an insertion of Nazism and cinema is simply out of the pale here, Ayyub wastes no ink on it and only makes a passing reference in the conclusion. I will be removing this per these objections and those above and per the GA review which also didn't include this. Gotitbro (talk) 03:24, 19 July 2025 (UTC)

49.204.191.38 (talk) 08:57, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
 I want to change the order of actors

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Cannolis (talk) 10:01, 27 January 2022 (UTC)