# Talk:Perfect Dark (Game Boy Color video game)

Removed BBFC rating, as it was not rated

--81.145.241.121 17:09, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

Image:Perfect Dark GBC Box Art.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 14:49, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

It says it isn't a port of the N64 and is an entirely different story than to the N64 game but when exactly does the story take place? --Victory93 (talk) 08:01, 6 January 2010 (UTC)

It takes place in January 2022. Yes, it is a prequel to the N64 title.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Niwi3 (talk • contribs) 15:25, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Perfect Dark (Game Boy Color)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Cptnono (talk) 06:56, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

Notes
"Objectives can range from rescuing hostages to exploring areas and recovering items, such as keycards, explosives or laptop computers which are useful to hack into electronic devices." might need to be cleaned up.
"At the time, Rare had the Game Boy team split into two, one for the Game Boy Color version of Donkey Kong Country and the other for Perfect Dark." - Might need to be "...Rare had its' 'Game Boy team split into two.."
"Criticism, however, was levelled at the game's difficult gameplay due to the lack of health and ammunition, and distinct lack of strategy overall." - "however" is not needed and could be seen as going against WP:WORDS. The reader can understand it without the "however". Same could be said for the following "On the other hand", even though that is not as bad.
"ripped off" could read as jargon. I get what you are saying, and I doubt any reader would not. However, it might be better to lay it out in something more encyclopedic.
Game Boyz is italicized in the prose but not in the reference.
I encourage you to find more for the "Gameplay" and the "Plot" sections. But you are bound by sources and made it detailed enough to meet the GA benchmark.
Wikilinking seems off. For example Game Boy Color is linked way down but not above. Double check your links to make sure they are not dupped (besides the lead and infobox but keep in mind that other factors do come into play)
Overall
You hit many things I look for plus some.

You did not overburden the lead with unneeded sources
You made sure to cite all quotes
The ref formatting is great (I personally do not like quotes but that is my reference v assisting in verification along with common practice)
You got the fictional vs encyclopedic tone down well
Images have FURs and you made sure not to go overboard with the use of copyrighted content
Wikilinking (and therefore the tone of someone familiar with games and someone not) is almost great (see above)
dab is good
no dead is good
Pass
The notes above are not bad enough to not pas this (please please please address them) since the article is so good. Editors at peer review might give you a harder time about grammar if you are going for FA (not saying it was bad but I do tend to be less critical so double check yourself).

GA review (see here for criteria)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose):  b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): 

It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 

It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 

It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 

It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 

Overall:
Pass/Fail: 

Cptnono (talk) 07:23, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for reviewing the article so quickly. I've fixed the issues you listed. If there is anything else that I should know, please let me know. <--Niwi3 (talk) 12:04, 23 March 2011 (CET)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Perfect Dark (Game Boy Color). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120316143230/http://uk.ign64.ign.com/articles/084/084357p1.html to http://uk.ign64.ign.com/articles/084/084357p1.html
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090329170617/http://uk.gameboy.ign.com/articles/163/163801p1.html to http://uk.gameboy.ign.com/articles/163/163801p1.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:08, 10 January 2018 (UTC)