# Talk:Typhoon Ampil (2024)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Typhoon Ampil (2024)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: HurricaneEdgar (talk · contribs) 09:10, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: 12george1 (talk · contribs) 01:28, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
Hi, I will be reviewing this article to cut down on the backlog of nominations--12george1 (talk) 01:28, 3 March 2025 (UTC)

"that threatened Japan's Tokyo Metropolitan Area since Faxai in 2019" - "that threatened Japan's Tokyo Metropolitan Area for the first time since Faxai in 2019"?
Speaking of that, I don't see a source anywhere in the article for the claim that Ampil was the first to threaten the Tokyo area since Faxai
"Ampil emerged from an atmospheric convection east of Kadena" - I'm thinking maybe a word like "originated" would be better than "emerged" because one common definition of "emerged" is "move out of or away from something and come into view." Same for the opening sentence of the MH
"before emerging into the Arctic Ocean and dissipated on August 23." -> "before emerging into the Arctic Ocean and dissipating on August 23."
"Joint Typhoon Warning Center (JTWC) began to re-monitoring it," - Either of these two: "Joint Typhoon Warning Center (JTWC) began to re-monitor it," or "Joint Typhoon Warning Center (JTWC) began re-monitoring it,"
"noting that it was in a marginal favorable environment" -> "noting that it was in a marginally favorable environment"
"Ampil then turned north-northeastward as the increasing influence of the low-level flow became the primary steering mechanism." - When? A date hasn't been mentioned since the fourth sentence of the previous paragraph
The MH does not mention an atmospheric pressure less than 950 mbar, unlike the infobox, which lists the lowest pressure as 947 mbar
I noticed some units of measure aren't in the same in terms of whether to list imperial or metric first. For example, I'm seeing 976 km (606 mi) but then 46 miles (74 km) and 155 km/h (100 mph)
"across the Kantō region]." - One too many closing brackets on that wikilink
"while energy company officials confirmed that electricity was restored to most areas." - Clarify that this occurred by August 17
Several references don't have publication dates
I think that's all I've got.--12george1 (talk) 01:28, 3 March 2025 (UTC)

@12george1: any update on the review? Most of these concerns have been addressed by HurricaneEdgar, so I helped finish the rest of them. Although I'd argue that mentioning JTWC's pressure estimate of 947 mbar (hPa) isn't necessary since it isn't the RSMC of the basin, I added it in the MH section anyway. —JCMLuis 💬 19:35, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
@HurricaneEdgar: I made one small edit myself but everything else looks like it has been taken care of. Thereafter, I will now pass this article. Good work!--12george1 (talk) 01:20, 20 March 2025 (UTC)