# Talk:Vermont Route 17

GA review (see here for criteria)
This is a nice piece of work, but it still has some shortcomings with respect to the good article criteria.
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose):  - Updated:   — master sonT - C 19:34, 16 March 2008 (UTC)) b (MoS):  - Updated:   — master sonT - C 19:34, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

distance in 2nd para of History needs to have a convert. Done
"The road was paved between 1936 and 1940" - so the pavement was removed after 1940?  Please clear up  Done
Lets use {{jct}} in the infobox to keep consistency with the junction list  Done
Bold in the history section?  Done
VT F-7 redirects here, thus I have restored the boldface for it. --TMF Let's Go Mets - Stats 22:26, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
Works for me - I'll note that for future reviews.  — master sonT - C 23:51, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
The route description does not detail anything about the NY 910L portion.  Since this article focuses partly on it - perhaps there should be some detail in there. Done
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 

It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 

It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars etc.: 

It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 
Can we get a map of the route? (not binding to the review)  Done
Overall:
Pass/Fail:  - Updated:   — master sonT - C 19:34, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
Overall its very good, just these few fixes and we're ready to go, holding until then
 — master sonT - C 19:09, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

Updated - passed  congratulations  — master sonT - C 19:34, 16 March 2008 (UTC)