# Talk:The Possum

This review is transcluded from Talk:The Possum/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: AdamBMorgan (talk) 00:07, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality: 

B. MoS compliance: 

Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources: 

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary: 
TV Squad is a blog, which are not normally acceptable as references.  You will need to prove why this case is exceptional, find a different source or remove the reference and associated lines from the article before becoming a Good Article.  The nanny-cam-bear item seems the only important one of the three that use this reference; however, the blog doesn't even actually state that it is a reference, only suggests that it might be. (The LA Times blog entries are OK because of the notability of the LA Times itself.)
C. No original research: 

Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects: 

B. Focused: 

Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias: 

Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc: 

Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales: 

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions: 

Overall:
Pass or Fail: 
The only problem I see with the article is the TV Squad reference.  Everything else seems fine.
I dropped TV Squad. Thanks for the review! — Hunter Kahn 02:22, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
In that case: Pass  - AdamBMorgan (talk) 14:01, 11 April 2010 (UTC)