# Talk:Pilot (Once Upon a Time)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Pilot (Once Upon a Time)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Grapple X (talk · contribs) 02:15, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Robbie Carlyle does strike me as a Rumpelstiltskin...
Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality: 
"On advice from the Blue Fairy (Keegan Connor Tracy), Geppetto (Tony Amendola) and Pinocchio (Jakob Davies) fashion a cupboard from a magical tree which will allow one person to escape the Queen's curse" -> Had to read this sentence twice, at first it seemed like the advice was from all three. perhaps "Following the Blue Fairy's (Keegan Connor Tracy) advice, Geppetto (Tony Amendola) and Pinocchio (Jakob Davis)...""not-so-quaint Storybrooke, Maine" -> I don't know about this. I'd probably drop the "not-so-quaint" bit, as I think this comes across with the change from storybook to modern times.Mr. Gold (Rumpelstiltskin), who also helped build and owns the entire town. -> I'd use em dashes instead of brackets here, as it would maintain consistency with all the other bracketed names being actors.I'm not sure if I like the contractions to "Once" popping up so frequently but I think that's just me.The lead mentions the actual dates of the IMDB airing, but the article body doesn't seem to.Don't know if it's worth including the metascore for the series in an episode article.
B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists: 
MOS is fine.
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources: 

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary: 

C. No original research: 
No problems here.
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects: 

B. Focused: 
Scope is grand.
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias: 
Article is neutral and unbiased.
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc: 
History is stable and uncontroversial.
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales: 

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions: 
One image (File:Onceuponpilot.jpg), fair use rationale is solid and image is used appropriately.
Overall:
Pass or Fail: 
Just a few minor 1A fixes to see to. Hope this new series doesn't distract you from being a one-woman Fringe machine though. GRAPPLE X 02:15, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for the review! Don't worry, I plan to get the rest of Fringe's third season to GA soon. And yes, Carlyle does an eery job as Rumpel. Best regards, Ruby 2010/2013 02:35, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
Had a look over the changes, ready to go with this one. Good work! GRAPPLE X 02:52, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
Thanks! Ruby 2010/2013 02:54, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Pilot (Once Upon a Time). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120107150653/http://spinoff.comicbookresources.com/2011/12/16/kitsis-horowitz-talk-willingham-once-upon-a-time to http://www.spinoff.comicbookresources.com/2011/12/16/kitsis-horowitz-talk-willingham-once-upon-a-time/
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130928035600/https://www.bbm.ca/_documents/top_30_tv_programs_english/2011/nat10172011.pdf to https://www.bbm.ca/_documents/top_30_tv_programs_english/2011/nat10172011.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:53, 18 June 2017 (UTC)