# Talk:Russian ironclad Sevastopol

This review is transcluded from Talk:Russian ironclad Sevastopol/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Dank (talk · contribs) 00:31, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
Review

The toolbox checks out.
"an 32-gun": a 32-gun
"; four on the upper deck as chase guns and 28 on the lower deck.": sentence fragment; change the semicolon to a comma
"two gun": two guns
"her armament was changed again and now consisted of fourteen": "... changed again, to fourteen".
I didn't like the comma after again and went with: "In 1877, her armament was changed again to 14 eight-inch guns".
"that reduced": "reduced" isn't impossible in this sense, but it's a little uncomfortable. How about "that narrowed"?
"All dates used in this article are Old Style": period needed.
"Robert Gardiner": "Gardiner, Robert"
Otherwise:
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose):  b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): 

It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 

It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 

It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 

It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 

Overall:
Pass/Fail: 
- Dank (push to talk) 00:47, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
All done, thanks for the review.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 17:43, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
Passed. - Dank (push to talk) 20:47, 29 June 2013 (UTC)