# Talk:SMS Kaiser Max (1875)

@Peacemaker67: - I wonder if you might have any sources that shed a bit of light on this ship's fate? Parsecboy (talk) 17:11, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:SMS Kaiser Max (1875)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk · contribs) 11:53, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Well constructed, will get back shortly. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 11:53, 22 September 2016 (UTC)


### Section 1
Para 1; The sentence She had a crew of 400 officers and men is a bit confusing. A reader may get an idea that it had 400 officers alone, and also men not including in these 400. Please correct this.
This is a pretty standard way to write this, and there's no good way to change it to fix what you suggest. See for instance FAs like Japanese aircraft carrier Shinano.


### Section 2
Para 3; The sentence The ship's fate after entering Yugoslav service was abruptly cut with a full stop, not giving a information about the fate. Instead of a full stop, a semi colon (;) would help.
Good catch, fixed.


### Lead
I suggest replacing the word "purportedly" with its synonym, because most of the standard dictionaries don't have a definition /meaning for the word.
This is a common word - I don't know where you looked, but it's in Merriam-Webster, the Cambridge Dictionary, and Dictionary.com (the only three I checked, surely its in others).
All good, address these suggestions and will be good to go. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 06:01, 24 September 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for your review. Parsecboy (talk) 09:54, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, spelling, and grammar):  b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): 

It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):  d (copyvio and plagiarism): 

It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 

It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 

It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 

Overall:
Pass/Fail: 

Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 10:20, 26 September 2016 (UTC)