# Talk:Romeo Void

"it's Debora Iyall's teasing, existential musings... " I did a quick search and found that all sources quoted the same thing - Wikipedia - so who said it? Fantailfan 00:11, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
Peter Woods - I grew up with Peter (his Uncle was my godfather) in Redding, CA. The hotlink on his name refers to another guy that isn't him. 75.18.48.166 03:41, 29 December 2006 (UTC)ME Rasmussen

This review is transcluded from Talk:Romeo Void/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 23:19, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.
Disambiguations: none found.
Linkrot: none found. Jezhotwells (talk) 23:20, 20 March 2011 (UTC)


### Checking against GA criteria
GA review (see here for criteria)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose):  b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): 
and a cover of Danish musician Jørgen Ingmann's popular instrumental song " Apache", "instrumental" or "track" would be better here, it is clearly not a "song".
Suitably compliant with MoS
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 
Well referenced, sources appear to be RS, no OR
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 
Good coverage without unnecessary trivia
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 

It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 
Image has suitable non-free use rationale, sound samples are compliant with Wikipedia criteria.
Overall:
Pass/Fail: 
Just one minor issue, on hold for seven days.
OK, all good now, listing as GA. Congratulations! Jezhotwells (talk) 17:06, 21 March 2011 (UTC)

"song" -> "composition". Thanks! -- Noj r (talk) 17:04, 21 March 2011 (UTC)

I see how this is a good article, but the article on Deborah is not, in comparison, well constructed. Since the two subjects are linked so closely, doesnt it make sense to also try to improve her article at the same time? i am a newbie at good article creation. I may try to improve it myself, of course.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 03:25, 25 March 2011 (UTC)

I was considering a redirect to Romeo Void. However, if you feel like improving the article, please go ahead. -- Noj r (talk) 23:32, 26 March 2011 (UTC)