# Talk:Two Stars in the Milky Way

Sinica Article

The same character seems to be referred to with different given names in the plot summary. 62.73.72.3 (talk) 23:45, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Qi. Thanks for the flag. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:08, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Two Stars in the Milky Way/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: Crisco 1492 (talk · contribs) 22:37, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: Jon698 (talk · contribs) 19:11, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

Hello @Crisco 1492:, I reviewed one of your other GA nominations, The Great Mecca Feast, and will be very interested in reviewing your work on this article. I'll make my comments in either a few hours or tomorrow. Jon698 (talk) 19:11, 2 February 2025 (UTC)
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, spelling, and grammar):  b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): 
I could find no problems with the article's prose or grammar. I made some minor edits to flip one sentence, changed a few words, and added the studio where the film was shot.
It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.
a (reference section):  b (inline citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):  d (copyvio and plagiarism): 
I checked five of the works cited (1. A Talented Child Actress: Violet Wong, A Tragedienne in the Teens, 2. The Occurrence of Cross-Media and Cross-Cultural Anxiety, 3. Wishful Images: Three Cinematographic Portraits of a National Film Company, 4. Listening to Early Chinese Sound Film: Two Stars in the Milky Way, and 5. Historiography and Sinification: Music in Chinese Cinema of the 1930s) and saw that the content was properly sourced from these works.
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 
Covers the plot, production, release, and reception of the film along with some analysis of it.
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 
No neutrality problems
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 
No edit wars and only minor edits from other users.
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 
Good images choices that are all in the public domain, including one that was on the front page as part of a DYK.
Overall:
Pass/Fail: 
Another fine article that you made.