# Talk:Yaropolk Iziaslavich

GA review (see here for criteria)
It is reasonably well written:
Pass. The article is well written although there are a few typos in the lead.
It is factually accurate and verifiable:
Pass. The article seems to be accurate and has numerous citations and references.
It is broad in its coverage:
Pass. The article seems to have a broad coverage of the topic. It has a section describing the Yaropolk's family background as well as a legacy section.
It follows the neutral point of view policy:
'Pass. The article follows WP:NPOV.
It is stable:
Pass. Yes, the article is stable.
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate:
Pass. Yes, the article has numerous images and it is also strongly backed up by an infobox and a template.
Overall:
Pass. The article is well written and in my opinion it meets the criteria of a good article, so I have decided to pass it. Kyriakos (talk) 07:26, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

There is a move discussion in progress on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Ukraine which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RMCD bot 20:47, 15 January 2023 (UTC)

It has been a while since this article was reviewed, so I took a look and saw that is lots of uncited prose and two "source needed" orange banners from 2023. Should this article go to WP:GAR? Z1720 (talk) 03:28, 4 May 2025 (UTC)


### Yaropolk Iziaslavich