# Talk:San Marino in the Eurovision Song Contest 2015

This review is transcluded from Talk:San Marino in the Eurovision Song Contest 2015/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: K. Peake (talk · contribs) 12:02, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

One of your two Eurovision nominees, so I will help axe this from the queue! --K. Peake 12:02, 9 February 2021 (UTC)


### Infobox and lead
Infobox looks good!
"represented San Marino in the Junior Eurovision Song Contest." → "represented San Marino in the Junior Eurovision Song Contest on separate occasions."
"The 2015 entry was" → "The 2015 entry in the Eurovision Song Contest was" to be specific
"in Moscow, and a contest on social media" → "in Moscow and a contest on social media" with the wikilink


### Background
Wikilink Eurovision Song Contest
"Their debut entry" → "The nation's debut entry"
"failed to qualify to the final" → "failed to qualify for the [[San Marino in the Eurovision Song Contest 2008#Grand final|grand final" with the target
Target semi-final to Eurovision Song Contest 2008#Semi-final 1 to lead to the one the country competed in
"the final." → "the grand final." with the target
"Between 2012 and 2014," → "From 2012 to 2014,"
Add a source for Jürgens' years or reword to mentioning them being in the 1960s
"to the final," → "for the grand final;"
"to bring San Marino" → "to bring the nation"
"that the nation would" → "that San Marino would"


### Before Eurovision
#### Internal selection
Img looks good!
"at SMRTV's studios." → "at the broadcaster's studios."
"while Simoncini represented" → "while Simoncini had represented"
Lowercase the Peppermints per MOS:THEMUSIC
"when she turned sixteen." → "when she turned 16." per MOS:NUM
"had composed twenty-three" → "had composed 23" but this sentence is not sourced
"Seventeen of those entries were written together with Meinunger." → "17 of those entries were written together with Bernd Meinunger."
"for the contest," → "for the Eurovision Song Contest,"
"These adaptations included..." this sentence is not sourced


#### Promotion
"on 16 March." → "on 16 March 2015."
"organization MEI, and record label" → "organization MEI and record label" with the wikilink
"The duo also embarked" → "Simoncini and Perniola also embarked"


### At Eurovision
Target Eurovision Rules to Rules of the Eurovision Song Contest
Target Big Five to Big Five (Eurovision) per MOS:LINK2SECT
"are required to" → "were required to"
"the top ten countries" → "the top 10 countries" per MOS:NUM
"with countries with favourable voting histories" where is this part sourced?
Target second semi-final to Eurovision Song Contest 2015#Semi-final 2
Remove target on Radio San Marino
Replace wikilink and introduction on Monetta, as we already know what entries she performed
"during the final." → "during the grand final."


#### Semi-final
Img looks good!
"Anita Simoncini and Michele Perniola took part" → "Simoncini and Perniola took part"
"20 and 21 May." → "20 and 21 May 2015."
Wikilink Antonello Carozza
"in a white dress shirt," → "in a white shirt,"
"that becomes covered" → "that became covered"
"failed to qualify to" → "failed to qualify for"
"among the top ten nations." → "among the top 10 nations." per MOS:NUM


#### Voting
The second sentence does not appear to be sourced
"This jury was" are you sure it was only them and not all of the jury?
"and that the" → "and how the"
[36] should be solely at the end of the para since it is used for the last two sentences
"and grand final" → "and the grand final"
"San Marino scored six" → "the nation scored six"
"in the second semi-final and grand final of the contest," → "in the contest's second semi-final and grand final, respectively,"


##### Points awarded to San Marino
Good


##### Points awarded by San Marino
Good


##### Detailed jury voting results
There should not be two dashes after Barbara Andreini
No sources are provided for the tables below


### References
Copyvio score looks great at 15.3!
Top job on the archiving!
Fix MOS:QWQ issues with ref 11


### Final comments and verdict
 On hold until all of the issues are fixed, but I found original research to be the most prominent one here. --K. Peake 21:45, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
Should be all set now, but just note that it's not original research if the sources are just unclear! Thanks for reviewing! Grk1011 (talk) 18:17, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
Grk1011 I do understand the difference but thank you for recognising potential confusion, though where is the second sentence of the voting sub-section backed up? --K. Peake 18:18, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
It is in the source provided for that section, specifically for those 3 claims it reads:
Since last year, the European Broadcasting Union announces the list of national jury members in advance.
Members of the jury must pursue a profession in or related to the music industry;
Members of the jury shall be citizens of the country they represent;
If you're concerned about the "five", I can move up the source from the next section? Hope this helps. Grk1011 (talk) 18:29, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
Grk1011 Yes that is what I am concerned about, please invoke the source using a refname. --K. Peake 19:37, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
All set! Grk1011 (talk) 19:44, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
Grk1011  Pass, apologies if this took a while longer than your previous GANs due to the confusion over the ref! --K. Peake 19:55, 10 February 2021 (UTC)