# Talk:St. Valentine's Day (30 Rock)

This review is transcluded from Talk:St. Valentine's Day (30 Rock)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: The Flash I am Jack's complete lack of surprise 02:25, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
Hi. I'll be reviewing this as part of April's GAN Backlog Elimination Drive. See Talk:I Married Marge/GA1 for my GAN setup. I've placed the article on hold; good luck improving the article. The Flash I am Jack's complete lack of surprise 02:25, 1 April 2010 (UTC)


### Lead
I'd suggest adding in what number the episode is overall in the series continuity; i.e., "It was the 11th episode of the show's third season and the whatever episode overall."
Done. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE)
In the plot paragraph, replace the semi-colon with a comma.
Done.
In stead of "Nielsen ratings system," I'd suggest "Nielsen Media Research."
Done.


### Plot
@The whole of the first paragraph: What? Very confused here... Can you clean it up and make it more clear?
I'm not feeling very solid about the rest of the prose in this section. Can you touch it up a notch?
I think I got it. If not, I'll get a copy-editor.
It's fine. The Flash I am Jack's complete lack of surprise 00:19, 2 April 2010 (UTC)


### Production
Everything in the first paragraph after the first sentence is unsourced.
It really doesn't need to be sourced, common sense, but removed.
Surely there's a source that Kenneth is played by McBrayer? In fact, here's one off the top of my head.
Do we really need a source?
Everything in an article should be sourced except for the plot summary, IMO.
I forgot to update this. I added a source.
"The episode was shot" → "The scene was shot"
Done.
Join the last paragraph with the McDonald's one.
The McDonald's thing and the deleted scenes are way different things.
I just thought because they were each about filming, but whatevs.
"In one of the cut scenes, was a conversation" Cleanup
I think I got it.
A little too many commas in the last sentence.
I think I got it.


### Reception
Ratings thing: same as in lead.
Done.
In EW's review: "theme; however,[...]"
I don't know what you mean, can you explain?
Oops, never mind; read it wrong.


### Images
No infobox screencap?
Don't know what image to use, so. Also, I don't want to violate the non-free content criteria.
How about this? It can meet the NFC criteria because it details how the apparent "product placement" was used. It's fine though if you don't want to use it.
Seems durable. What should I say for the caption? "Jack and Elisa buying McFlurry's and spending Valentine's Day together"? Also, one of the reasons I don't add a screenshot, cause I'm not good in "brainstorming" a readable caption. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 14:45, 2 April 2010 (UTC)'
LOL, how about just "Jack and Elisa buy McFlurry's on their Valentine's Day date"? The Flash I am Jack's complete lack of surprise 16:23, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
Yeah, exactly. Anyways, added screenshot to the article. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 16:49, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
PD Jon Hamm image is fine.


### Final say
Alright, I'm satisfied. Good job, I'm passing the article. Thanks for taking care of the issues. Cheers, The Flash I am Jack's complete lack of surprise 20:43, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for the review, Flash, I appreciate it. :) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:29, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 9 external links on St. Valentine's Day (30 Rock). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.nypost.com/p/entertainment/tv/item_4pYJ6MbX1Xy5pmYKH0x7tK%3Bjsessionid%3DA94459185EB4B87822E7F2985E461540
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090227041211/http://hollywoodinsider.ew.com/2009/01/tina-fey-and-jo.html to http://hollywoodinsider.ew.com/2009/01/tina-fey-and-jo.html
Corrected formatting/usage for http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/showtracker/2010/02/30-rock-its-anna-howard-shaw-day.html
Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/5oKVnq7m4?url=http://www.pbpulse.com/tv/30-rock/2009/01/16/liz-cant-get-vacation-time-on-30-rock/ to http://www.pbpulse.com/tv/30-rock/2009/01/16/liz-cant-get-vacation-time-on-30-rock/
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.stltoday.com/blogzone/tube-talk/tv-ratings/2009/02/tv-ratings-for-feb-9-15-the-full-list/
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.nj.com/entertainment/tv/index.ssf/2009/02/30_rock_st_valentines_day_my_m.html
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.pbpulse.com/tv/30-rock/2009/02/13/love-gone-wrong-and-funny-on-30-rock/
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.boston.com/ae/tv/blog/2009/02/_after_last_thu.html
Corrected formatting/usage for http://adage.com/adages/post?article_id=134689
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:42, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on St. Valentine's Day (30 Rock). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.nypost.com/seven/02012009/tv/rock_y_road_to_romance_152805.htm
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100214023638/http://www.pbpulse.com/tv/30-rock/2009/03/20/liz-dumps-her-handsome-bubble-man-on-30-rock/ to http://www.pbpulse.com/tv/30-rock/2009/03/20/liz-dumps-her-handsome-bubble-man-on-30-rock/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:54, 19 June 2017 (UTC)