# Talk:Women's Appreciation

I've put the screen shot up for this episode and removed the one that did not cite its sources. Hadiz 07:20, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

Hello,
I just noticed that the information under "Trivia" regarding the filming of the mall scene seems somewhat contradictory.
In one portion it says that it is a real mall in Scranton and "marks the first time footage of Scranton has appeared in 
an episode". However, down further it says that it was filmed at a mall in Sherman Oaks. I'm assuming that the first fact
is trying to say that the mall is the first instance where a real location in Scranton is specifically mentioned and 
recreated; while the second is saying where it was actually filmed. Regardless, I think there might be a better way to 
phrase it so that the article doesn't seem to contradict itself. If someone could clear this up that would be great.
Thanks and keep up the great work.
Pharoah6905 03:24, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

The article clearly states that the establishing shot is of real Scranton. The scenes themselves were filmed in California, of course. -- Raymondc0 03:33, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

I maintain that the demerit tally is merely a restatement of a joke from the episode. Unnamed user 24.4.5.162 claims that it's "an interesting tidbit." I respond that interesting tidbits in and of themselves are not notable and therefore do not belong in Wikipedia. Other opinions? -- Raymondc0 (talk) 05:21, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Women's Appreciation/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Gen. Quon (talk · contribs) 22:52, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
I will review this soon. BTW, I've been meaning to try and work on season 2 of The Office for awhile, as its my favorite.--Gen. Quon (talk) 22:52, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

Image: I think this is very important to the article, but I would beef up the FUR rationale on the image page
Plot: I would add the characters full names and add who played them after their names appear
Plot: "He concludes by offering..." -> "He closes the meeting by offering..." (I just associated 'concludes' with thinking and it was a hair confusing)
Plot: mustache and moustache are used. I'd use one type
Reception: I don't think the episode was an hour. It looks like it came on after "My Name is Earl", which was also supersized, at 7:36, so I think the episode was 36 minutes long (Or possible 43, as one reviewer claimed)
Reception: "It attracted an estimated 7.0 million viewers,[9] and ranked fourth in its timeslot (behind episodes of Survivor: Fiji, Ugly Betty, and Are You Smarter Than a 5th Grader?).[10]" -> "It attracted an estimated 7.0 million viewers,[9] and ranked fourth in its timeslot, behind episodes of Survivor: Fiji, Ugly Betty, and Are You Smarter Than a 5th Grader?.[10]"
Those are the only issues. Minor nitpickings. On hold for seven days.--Gen. Quon (talk) 23:10, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

All hopefully addressed. Thanks for the review. Ruby 2010/2013 03:53, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
And in reply to expanding second season articles, you should! I'm particarily fond of the third season, but it'd be great if all older episodes got to GA status eventually. Most need a lot of work. Ruby 2010/2013 03:58, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
Everything looks grand. A good chunk of the season two GAs are poorly sourced as they are, so I might start by beefing those up first. This, however, will pass!--Gen. Quon (talk) 17:34, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
Thanks! Ruby 2010/2013 18:05, 8 June 2012 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Women's Appreciation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120501213026/http://www.nbc.com/the-office/episode-guide/season-3/59065/womens-appreciation/episode-322/59437 to http://www.nbc.com/the-office/episode-guide/season-3/59065/womens-appreciation/episode-322/59437/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:02, 31 May 2017 (UTC)