# Talk:SM UB-16

This review is transcluded from Talk:SM UB-16/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Well written: Pass
One minor issue though:
"UB-16 and sister boat UB-17 comprised an order of two submarines ordered - a little redundant
How about: "The German Imperial Navy ordered UB-16 and sister boat UB-17 which comprised an order of two submarines ordered…" to make it really redundant? Or I could just change the ordered to placed. :) — Bellhalla (talk) 14:06, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
Factually Accurate: Pass
Broad in its coverage: Looks good, pass
Neutral: I see no issues, pass
Stable: Pass
Images: Everything checks out, valid fair-use for File:German submarine SM UB-16.jpg - Pass
Very nice work, Belhalla. Parsecboy (talk) 21:43, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for taking the time to review the article. — Bellhalla (talk) 14:06, 18 March 2009 (UTC)