# Talk:Transfer Pak

Pokémon Stadium's emulation is based on the Super Game Boy, including using the same borders.
Perfect Dark's Transfer Pak cheats are unlocked by default on Nintendo Switch Online.
The Japanese version of Mickey's Speedway USA can still unlock Huey without needing the Transfer Pak.
Mention of the Transfer Pak appears in the code of Doraemon 3: Nobita no Machi SOS!, The New Tetris, Hydro Thunder, and  Rugrats in Paris.
64GB Cable support was dummied out of Mario Artist: Paint Studio and Communication Kit; it can be restored through hacking, and indicates it would have connected to a special cartridge specifically to allow images to be printed on Game Boy Printer, as well as an unreleased color printer.
An unofficial fan translation of Densha de Go! 64 actually added Transfer Pak support to the game.
If anyone can find reliable sources that mention these facts, it would be greatly appreciated. -- Cyberlink420 (talk) 17:19, 25 February 2025 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Transfer Pak/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: Cyberlink420 (talk · contribs) 15:48, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
Reviewer: Cukie Gherkin (talk · contribs) 00:13, 19 April 2025 (UTC)

Infobox

Is there a citation for NUS-019? If not, it may be worthwhile to just not mention it.
 Done
The dates in the infobox are only in the infobox and not cited
 Done They're actually the dates for the Pokémon Stadium games since it was originally bundled with those before getting a standalone release. (Sadly haven't been able to track down a source saying when that standalone version launched.)
Lead

A couple instances of Game Boy Color instead of GBC outside the lead
 Done
Honestly, I never realized that the Pokémon games were emulated. Wild stuff
Right? I've been kicking around the idea of including a screenshot of the games being emulated through Stadium for illustrative purposes. Probably something like this since it otherwise uses the Super Game Boy borders and you can't tell it's Stadium at a glance. Or maybe one of the games' transfer menus would be better. Would welcome the input!
It might be worthwhile to mention the existence of the 64 GB Cable and its cancellation in the lead
 Done
"As a result, while recognized as one of the first examples of connectivity between Nintendo's home consoles and handhelds, the Transfer Pak has come to be retrospectively regarded as largely unnecessary by members of the gaming press." -> "As a result, while recognized as one of the first examples of connectivity between Nintendo's home consoles and handhelds, retrospective coverage of the Transfer Pak has found it largely unnecessary."
 Done
History

I feel that the Cabbage mention and the paragraph of cancelled support would work better as a subsection of Supported games, i.e. "Cancelled support". Also, Cabbage IMO should be the second paragraph.
 Done
Made minor improvements (hyphenated two words and changed "a N64" to "an N64")
Supported games

I'm not sure what this means: "use transferred Pokémon in its minigames" How are they used?
For example, let's say you're playing the Clear Cut Challenge minigame, where you can play as Scyther, Scizor, or Pinsir. If you have one of those three Pokémon in your connected Game Boy game, that same Pokémon in the minigame can appear with your GB Pokémon's nickname and (if it's a shiny) color scheme. EDIT: I replaced "use" with "play as" to make it more clear.
Huh, that's actually pretty neat.
Referring to the characters from the Mario sports games as "player characters" could be confusing since a "player character" doesn't make super clear that these original characters are distinct from Mario characters.
I wrote "created character" originally, but it didn't feel like the right word at the time since you don't really create the character beyond picking one of four designs and giving it a name. Maybe it would be better to specify it further as "the player characters from the corresponding GBC games' story modes" instead? EDIT: Just did that.
Is there a Nintendo Classics version of Mario Golf? If so, were any Transfer Pak features included? Same for Tennis and Golf on N64.
The 64 versions of Golf and Tennis on Classics lack Transfer Pak support, as does GBC Golf.
Changed one instance of "mini-game" to "minigame"
Made some changes, particularly with semicolons, as some were better served by making new sentences instead.
Be sure to be consistent with player vs. players when applicable
 Done, mostly. I've changed most instances to "players", but stuck with "the player" for Choro-Q and Beast Wars. Since those games give stat boosts that only affect whichever specific player has the Transfer Pak plugged into their controller, the use of the singular "player" for those games made more sense IMO.
Do the Doduo/Dodrio modes need to be unlocked? I thought they were available at the start, but I may be misremembering. Either way, it may be worthwhile to just say something like "These games can be played at double or triple speed."
They are unlockable, yes, per the cited source.
Calling the second generation of Pokémon games "Game Boy" game might be misleading, since Crystal is GBC-exclusive.
I had assumed at the time that it would be okay and that the reader would grasp the general meaning, but would "portable games" be a better substitute instead? EDIT: Actually, I'm just scrapping "Game Boy" so it's "second generation of Pokémon games".
Reception

Is there any reception re: the Nintendo Switch release of Mario Tennis and Golf?
Not really, far as I can find, or at least none that mention the Transfer Pak. The only review I can find that does is the one I cited confirming the minigames being unlocked, but it doesn't really express an opinion on them beyond "These used to be locked; fortunately they're unlocked now."
Spotcheck

[1] Checked; looks good
[2] Checked; I see it mentioned that there is a surfing Pikachu in Yellow, but doesn't seem to specify it as a mini-game. Do you have a better source that is more explicit?
 Done. I already had it cited for Stadium '99 since that's what the article was focused on, so I just moved that citation for JP Stadium as well..
[3] Checked; looks good
[4] Checked; looks good
All right, I'm pretty happy with the article now. Good job - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 22:06, 19 April 2025 (UTC)

Thanks much. This article has been my pet project for the last few years, so it's nice to know the hard work has paid off. Only other questions I have are...
Does it need an image of the Transfer Pak being used in a game for illustration?
Should the supported section be converted to a table (see mockup) or left as prose?
I've basically done this all solo up until now, so feedback even beyond the GA review would much appreciated, especially if I decide to pursue FA down the line. (Though that seems unlikely since there's *no* development information as far as I can find.) -- Cyberlink420 (talk) 22:15, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
I believe that the images are fine as is; I asked others what they thought and they agreed. As for the table, I think that would be an improvement. I considered suggesting it, but the way it's structured isn't bad either. - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 22:46, 19 April 2025 (UTC)