# Talk:The Rapes of Graff

"It was revealed prior to the episode airing that Veronica would not discover the identity of the rapist" 
How was it revealed, in interview, in publicity material, where when?  I would guess it was revealed in advertising on the WB but please clarify.  Horkana
"As part of his scheme to frame Duncan Kane for the death of Lilly Kane, Aaron arranges for an escort to be hired for the purpose of seducing Cliff and stealing his briefcase, which contained the Logan Echolls murder case files and keys to the storage locker containing Aaron Echoll's personal belongings, including an Oscar statue. "
I don't recall this actually being revealed in the episode. I searched the recap but it says nothing of this either. El burrito 01:44, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

Image:Veronica Mars 2x16.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 02:21, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:The Rapes of Graff/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Gen. Quon (talk · contribs) 03:35, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

Sorry for the delay!

Maybe put ratings info in the lead?
Done
Possibly expand why it was critically applauded.
Done
The first paragraph is a little choppy. I would recommend rewriting it so all the sentences flow together a little better.
What is "Cliff's case"
Specified. Also copyedited this whole thing.
Is Troy a member of the fraternity? Or is that separate?
No, he's not. Tell me if it's better now.
The plot summary is kind of all over the place, but I have a feeling part of that has to do with the fact that I've never seen Veronica Mars. Would it be useful to include a "Background" subheading before the plot summary, so as to catch people up to speed (like this)
No, the plot summary was just choppy. :)
"The episode's title was thought of by other regular writer Phil Klemmer" -> "Phil Klemmer, another of the series' writers, thought of the episode's title."
Done
Is the "episode's mystery" the rape, or the perpetrator in Cliff's case, or what. I'm a little confused here.
Done
"As a joke in the episode, the writers bleeped George Michael out and subtitled…" -> The show had previously been alluded to on Arrested Development when some of George Michael's dialogue is redacted and replaced by a subtitle that reads, 'reference to off-network high school private eye drama censored by Fox.'"
Done
I would move the bit about Rob Thomas contacting the two actors immediately after the line about how they guest starred in a previous episode.
I don't see that line…what are you talking about?
Don't worry about it. I think it's fine the way it is.--Gen. Quon (Talk)  02:15, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
"Cera and Shawkat specifically asked that they not be in scenes and that they would not play roles similar to their characters in Arrested Development." -> "Both Cera and Shawkat requested that their roles not be similar to their characters on Arrested Development."
Done
"After the episode, Ashmore had stated that" -> "After the episode aired, Ashmore stated that"
Done
Move the tidbit about the title being a spoonerism up to the very first paragraph in production, right after you mention that Klemmer thought of the title (also, is there a better source for that?)
I moved it, but unfortunately there's not a better source. Should I remove it altogether? Johanna (formerly BenLinus1214)talk to me!see my work 01:02, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
I think for right now it's OK. If this were to go to FAN, though, I'd find a better source.--Gen. Quon (Talk)  02:15, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
"Price Peterson of TV.com gave a positive review, expressing confusion…" -> Price Peterson of TV.com gave a positive review. Although he expressed confusion over the lack of closure, he praised other aspects of the episode."
Done
Who is Alan Sepinwall
He's probably one of the most prominent TV critics around. Even though this is just his blog, the blog in that form was continued on HitFix. Johanna (formerly BenLinus1214)talk to me!see my work 01:02, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
I should've specified what I meant, haha. I just meant, maybe you should put that he's a TV reviewer or something, because his name is in the middle of a bunch of review websites. It's not a huge deal.--Gen. Quon (Talk)  02:15, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
The word "praise" (or variations thereof) are used four times in the review section. I'd mix that up a bit.
Done
Fix these issues up and you're ready to go!--Gen. Quon (Talk)  15:34, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

@Gen. Quon: I've responded to everything. Take a look now and let me know what you think. Johanna (formerly BenLinus1214)talk to me!see my work 01:02, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
I'll pass it! Good job.--Gen. Quon (Talk)  02:15, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on The Rapes of Graff. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071223021321/http://www.ifmagazine.com/feature.asp?article=1612 to http://www.ifmagazine.com/feature.asp?article=1612
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:10, 19 June 2017 (UTC)