# Talk:The Lucky Shot

This review is transcluded from Talk:The Lucky Shot/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 12:34, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

I'll read through this now and will finish this soon JAGUAR  12:34, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguations: No links found.
Linkrot: No linkrot found.


### Checking against GA criteria
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar):  b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): 
I would strongly recommend cutting the lead into two paragraphs to make the lead more balanced
I think the lead focuses too much on the plot and not enough is mentioned about the production/reception (whatever it covered on it anyway!)
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 

It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 

It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 

It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 

Overall:
Pass/Fail: 

As before, this one meets the GA criteria so I'll promote it now. Well done JAGUAR  15:28, 29 May 2015 (UTC)