# Talk:Volvariella surrecta

This review is transcluded from Talk:Volvariella surrecta/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: MathewTownsend (talk · contribs) 23:27, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

Hi, I'll reveiw this - looks very interesting!  MathewTownsend (talk) 23:27, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
review
This is a very nice article. I've made a few copy edits[1], hopefully ok with you.
GA review-see WP:WIAGA for  criteria (and here for what they are not)

Is it reasonably well written?
a. prose: clear and concise, respects copyright laws, correct spelling and grammar:

b. complies with  MoS for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation: 

Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
a. provides references to all sources in the section(s) dedicated to footnotes/citations according to the guide to layout: 

b. provides in-line citations from reliable sources where necessary:y 

c. no original research: 

Is it broad in its coverage?
a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic: 

b. it remains focused and does not go into unnecessary detail (see summary style): 

Does it follow the neutral point of view policy.
fair representation without bias: 

Is it stable?
no edit wars, etc: 

Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
a. images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales: 

b. images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions: 

Overall:
Pass or Fail: 
Pass!

Congratulations!  MathewTownsend (talk) 20:45, 10 July 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the review and copyedits Mathew! Sasata (talk) 21:32, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
I also made a few copy edit changes that I hope are all right. If I have done something wrong, please let me know since I am new to editing on Wikipedia. Thank you! BriannaMaxim (talk) 23:08, 16 July 2012 (UTC)