# Talk:Washington State Route 902

This review is transcluded from Talk:Washington State Route 902/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: --PCB 17:59, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose):  b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): 
Good writing.
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 
In ref 3, why is WSDOT abbreviated?
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 

It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 

It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 
Whatever.
Overall:
Pass/Fail: 
I don't have any issues with this article, so I'll pass it. You might want to explain how exactly was the definition changed in 1991.