# Talk:The Deposition (The Office)

For some reason, people keep trying to add a Note mentioning that returning the ball before it strikes their side of the table (formally known as obstruction) is not permitted (Rule 2.10.1.5). Each time it's added, somebody else deletes it as pointless trivia. (A decision with which I agree.) For the record, many rules of table tennis are violated in this episode. Nobody serves the ball legally (rules 2.6.1 through 2.6.3), "volleying for serve" violates rule 2.13.1, and a score of "19 serving 4" is not possible (rule 2.11.1). The characters are obviously playing "house rules" rather than the official rules. This is not noteworthy. -- Raymondc0 (talk) 14:52, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

Mastrchf- when you work on this article check out around minute 47 in this interview with Michael Schur, he talks about using CGI for the ping-pong --Mr.crabby ''''' (Talk) 16:20, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

Sure.  I'm hoping to get to the article tonight, tomorrow morning on the latest.  Mastrchf (t/c) 16:24, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:The Deposition (The Office)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it well written?
A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct: 
Well done.
B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation: 

Is it verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check?
A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline: 

B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose): 

C. It contains no original research: 

D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism: 

Is it broad in its coverage?
A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic: 

B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style): 

Is it neutral?
It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each: 

Is it stable?
It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute: 

Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content: 

B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions: 

Overall:
Pass or Fail: 
I have gone off and passed the article to GA, as I did not find anything troubling while reading the article. As a fan of the show, everyone who contributed to the article did a fine job with describing the episode. Congratulations on everyone for their hard effort
--  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 21:35, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

I'm not quite sure how to cite a video, so if someone else can, that'd be great. Anyway, in the [Comic-Con panel that NBC.com has put up], someone mentions (at around 17 minutes left in the video) that Michael pushing Toby's meal off the table was an unscripted moment that Paul Lieberstein came up with. Thanks. -- Viewdrix (talk) 01:09, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

Thanks.  I'll find a time to put it in. Mastrchf (t/c) 02:03, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on The Deposition (The Office). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/television/news/e3if908f8e7990b715738fd1460067e3828
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080418063200/http://www.wga.org:80/subpage_newsevents.aspx?id=2775 to http://www.wga.org/subpage_newsevents.aspx?id=2775
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080501075439/http://www.wga.org/subpage_member.aspx?id=2529 to http://www.wga.org/subpage_member.aspx?id=2529
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:30, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 6 external links on The Deposition (The Office). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added {{dead link}} tag to http://nbcumv.com/listing_detail.nbc/nbc-20071115210000.html
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071109162402/http://community.tvguide.com/blog-entry/TVGuide-Editors-Blog/Strike-Watch-Season/Office-Closing-Carell/800026773 to http://community.tvguide.com/blog-entry/TVGuide-Editors-Blog/Wga-Post-Strike/Office-Closing-Carell/800026773%26
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.wga.org/subpage_newsevents.aspx?id=2775
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090924060428/http://www.tube-talk.com/2008/03/interview-with-rainn-wilson-and-greg.html to http://www.tube-talk.com/2008/03/interview-with-rainn-wilson-and-greg.html
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080730074544/http://www.nbc.com/Comic-Con/video/clips/the-office/279939/ to http://www.nbc.com/Comic-Con/video/clips/the-office/279939/
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080624060919/http://thescrumbrandon.com/v1/2008/05/01/podcast-xix-michael-schur/ to http://thescrumbrandon.com/v1/2008/05/01/podcast-xix-michael-schur/
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121113213449/http://www.nbc.com/the-office/episode-guide/season-4/59501/deposition/episode-412/59662/ to http://www.nbc.com/the-office/episode-guide/season-4/59501/deposition/episode-412/59662/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:38, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

According to IMDB (and Netflix)  Did I Stutter is Episode 12; https://www.imdb.com/title/tt1031451/
The Deposition should be season 4, episode 8. https://www.imdb.com/title/tt1031476  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mt1955 (talk • contribs) 00:54, 18 December 2018 (UTC) 

Season 4 Episode 12 is correct – see "The Deposition" in List of The Office (U.S. TV series) episodes. The episode numbers used here are the original broadcaster's (NBC's) episode numbers, not the Netflix or IMDB episode numbers. NBC counted hour-long episodes as two because The Office is a half-hour show. —Bruce1eetalk 08:00, 18 December 2018 (UTC)

Episode no is wrong it is episode 8 112.196.188.101 (talk) 11:03, 26 October 2021 (UTC)

 Not done. Wikipedia uses the original broadcaster's (NBC's) episode numbers. So episode number 12 is correct. See List of The Office (American TV series) episodes.