# Talk:U.S. Route 13 in Maryland

I don't see why the U.S. Route XX in Maryland articles shouldn't follow the standard for ordinary state routes. I do agree that the sheer number of junctions for the really long routes like US 301 would be a bit unwieldy, but what is the standard for judging the number of routes that ought to be listed? Personally I didn't feel that the list I generated was that long, but I am willing to learn why, to avoid mistakes in the future. -TheOneKEA

The template page says to try to limit the number to 8 (it used to be 5 or 6, but I changed it) and that the list is just so that the user can get an idea of where the route is located in relation to other routes.  That goes for all routes not just U.S. Route X in Maryland articles.  According to WP:MDRD/EG though, the "Major junctions" section should include junctions with all numbered routes, so that would be the place to put a more complete list.  Hope that helps.-Jeff (talk) 05:32, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
Okay, the junction listing is now finished. I borrowed some methodology from the Interstate 95 in Maryland article's junction listing. I'm going to apply this to some of the other articles mentioned elsewhere. -TheOneKEA

Anybody have any pictures of the welcome center near the Virginia Border they can upload? I was there last year, and I'm kind of sorry that I never did. ----DanTD (talk) 00:47, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:U.S. Route 13 in Maryland/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

I made some copyedits, so please check to be sure I haven't changed anything I shouldn't have. Article passed. --ErgoSum88 (talk) 16:34, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality: 

B. MoS compliance: 

Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources: 

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary: 

C. No original research: 

Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects: 

B. Focused: 

Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias: 

Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc: 

Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales: 

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions: 

Overall:
Pass or Fail: 

The article phrases it "by 1975", and cites an Exxon map of that vintage.  However, looking at the 1968 USGS topo (which was based on 1967 aerial photos), it can be narrowed down to "by 1967". Niobrara (talk) 16:57, 6 February 2014 (UTC)