# Talk:Zara-class cruiser (1879)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Zara-class cruiser (1879)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Iazyges (talk · contribs) 15:08, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
Will start soon. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 15:08, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

As far as I can see, the article fits the "Immediate Pass" bill; some prose suggestions are offered, but the prose is already understandable, so it is passable. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 18:06, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

No DAB links Y
No Dead links Y
Images appropriately licensed Y

"Despite the lengthy design process, the ships proved to be failures in service, primarily the result of their low speed." perhaps "primarily as a result of their low speed" or " primarily because of their low speed"
Works for me.
" As a result of her different hull, Sebenico is sometimes not included in the Zara class." More of a personal question, but is it mentioned if she is considered her own class, or part of a different class? -- Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 18:12, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
Conway's and Greger both list her as a unique type. Thanks for these two reviews, Iazyges. Parsecboy (talk) 18:25, 5 September 2017 (UTC)