# Talk:Wooper

I've added some pics. AtmanDave 18:59, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

NONE of your pics were necessary additions into the article, and the info on shinies is not allowed.  See WP:FAIR. -Jeske (v^_^v) 19:49, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
Sorry, I'll try to stick to wiki guidelines in the future. Thanks. Also, I think the last edit with the trading card is justified. AtmanDave 22:21, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

What about adding the sprite from CrysTal next to the video game section to show how Wooper is portrayed in the video games? AtmanDave 00:22, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

No - talk to User:Ryulong,a nd he'll tell you why.  If you want the cliffsnotes version, then we need to have as FEW fair-use pics as possible per article (mainly because of the fact that Wikipedia has been rebelling against fair-use images for the past year).  Besides, the Crystal sprite for Wooper differs from both the male and female Diamond/Pearl sprites for Wooper, and thus can be confusing. -Jeske (v^_^v) 00:40, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
Ok. If you see anything this article needs to make itself better, do tell. Thanks. AtmanDave 01:01, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Might I suggest joining the Pokémon Wikiproject? -Jeske (v^_^v) 02:16, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Is Wooper really that notable to have its own page? The most notable Pokemon of this gen are arguably Togepi, Ho-Oh and Lugia due to their roles in the anime, and even they don't have their own pages. Xoyid (talk) 18:10, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

the short answer is "ye"
the long answer is "yes"
notability here boils down to if sources cover a topic, and sources cover wooper in enough detail to justify this being a good article. it's why wooper and that pot-bellied asshole have articles, and why greninja and togepi still don't (though greninja actually has some neat history as a merge) consarn (talck) (contirbuton s) 18:20, 18 November 2025 (UTC)