# Talk:She Bangs

Does use of the chorus in this page fall under copyvioing? Johnleemk | Talk 11:32, 24 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Since we've only got the chorus, I would probably argue fair use. I'm no copyright lawyer though. Isomorphic 01:54, 25 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Image:Ricky Martin - She Bangs - single cover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 04:19, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

I'm no expert on salsa and what constitutes "romantic", but this song seems to be about lust, not romance.John ISEM (talk) 13:56, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

"Channing Tatum is a dancer in the background." - of the video is that ? There's lots of dancers. Is Tatum the only famous one ? -- Beardo (talk) 19:25, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

Debut Latin Songs number #6
Debut Latin pop songs number #3

This review is transcluded from Talk:She Bangs/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Kyle Peake (talk · contribs) 05:29, 17 June 2020 (UTC)

Will start on this sometime today --Kyle Peake (talk) 05:29, 17 June 2020 (UTC)


### Infobox and lead
Recording date is unsourced
Done. — Tom(T2ME) 09:17, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
Link to the music videos in the infobox
Done. — Tom(T2ME) 09:17, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
"is a song recorded by Puerto Rican singer" → "is a song by Puerto Rican singer"
With all due respect, this is a preference. There's nothing wrong with the prose right now, actually is preferred by editors since it's been used in all articles I brought to a FA status. — Tom(T2ME) 09:17, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
"for his sixth studio album Sound Loaded (2000)" → "from his sixth studio album, Sound Loaded (2000)"
Same as above here. — Tom(T2ME) 09:17, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
Either way, you need the comma for separation --Kyle Peake (talk) 09:39, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
"It was written by and produced" → "The song was written and produced by"
Song is repeated again from the previous sentence. "It" is fine.
Well the album was mentioned after the song in the previous sentence, so specification is needed --Kyle Peake (talk) 09:39, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
"and Robi Draco Rosa with additional writing" → "and Robi Draco Rosa, with additional writing"
Done. — Tom(T2ME) 09:17, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
Wikilink lead single to itself
Mention that the release was to radio and what label it was through
"on September 23, 2000" → "on September 22, 2000"
""She Bangs" is a dance song with" → "The song is a dance track, with"
With all due respect, the proposed prose reads poorly. — Tom(T2ME) 09:17, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
The title should not be mentioned more than once in a para of the lead --Kyle Peake (talk) 09:39, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
"influences in which the singer who wants hold" → "influences, while the lyrics see Martin wanting to hold"
Done.
"It was met with positive reviews by music critics noted" → "It received widely positive reviews from music critics, who often noted" with the appropriate target
Again, the proposed prose would overcomplicate things. We want to keep it simple. — Tom(T2ME) 09:17, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
But grammatically, "met with positive reviews by music critics noted the similarities" clearly has issues and the target is obviously required, plus "received" should be here and "met with" in the body --Kyle Peake (talk) 09:39, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
"previous single "Livin' la Vida Loca" and received a Grammy" → "previous single "Livin' la Vida Loca", and received a" with the target
not linking single, per WP:OVERLINK, the term is widely known. Comma added. — Tom(T2ME) 09:17, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
"in 2001" → "at the 2001 Grammy Awards" with the target
Done — Tom(T2ME) 09:17, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
"Commercially, it peaked at number one" → "Commercially, the song peaked at number one"
Done — Tom(T2ME) 09:17, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
"Switzerland and reached the top five in several countries in Europe" → "Switzerland, and reached the top five in several other European countries"
No need per comma there, my Grammarly editor. — Tom(T2ME) 09:17, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
"A Spanish-language version of the song was also recorded" → "A Spanish-language version of "She Bangs" was recorded" with the target
Done — Tom(T2ME)
"and reached on top of the" → "and reached the summit of the"
Done — Tom(T2ME) 09:17, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
Target Billboard to Billboard (magazine)
Done — Tom(T2ME) 09:17, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
Wikilink Hot Latin Songs on itself solely instead
Done. — Tom(T2ME) 09:17, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
"The music video for "She Bangs"" → "The music video for the original version"
No need for this. The videos are literally the same for both versions.
"The video's suggested sexual content" → "The suggested sexual content of the video"
Done. — Tom(T2ME)
"and was banned in several Latin American countries" → "and led to it being banned in several Latin American countries"
Done. — Tom(T2ME) 09:17, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
"Despite the backlash, it won the" → "Despite the backlash, the visual won the"
Done. — Tom(T2ME) 09:17, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
"Lo Nuestro Award for Video of the Year in 2001" → "Lo Nuestro Award for Video of the Year, both in 2001"
Done. — Tom(T2ME) 09:17, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
""She Bangs" has been covered by several artists" → "The song has been covered by several artists,"
Done. — Tom(T2ME) 09:17, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
"His rendition was met with unfavorable reactions" → "His cover version received generally unfavorable responses"


### Composition and lyrical interpretation
Shouldn't a Background section be above this one, or add background info to the article and combine with this section if there's not enough for its own?
Wikilink Latin music to itself instead
"and lasts for four minutes and forty-two seconds" → "and lasts for 4:42"
"digital sheet music for the single" → "digital sheet music for the song" with the appropriate wikilink
"and has a groove of" → "with a groove of"
"from the low note of D4 to" → "from the low note of D4, to"
Remove target on instrumentation
"features powerful percussion" → "features "powerful" percussion"
Target tropical to Tropical music
"wrote that the single starts" → "wrote that the song begins"
"They are followed by" → "The beats are followed by an"
Wikilink horn section to itself
"similar to the one on" → "which Willman called reminiscent of the one on"
"and even harder to hold."" → "and even harder to hold"."
"Billboard's reviewer stated" → "Billboard wrote" since this is fine in a non reception section
"and that make cynics bark" → "and will make cynics bark"


### Critical reception
Why is the img hidden?
Retitle to Release and reception, so move the radio sentence to here instead
"The song received generally positive reviews" → The song was met with widely positive reviews" since there are no negative ones
"A reviewer of Billboard magazine" → "The staff of Billboard"
"flavor of Martin's 1999 number-one single "Livin' la Vida Loca"" → "flavor of "Livin' la Vida Loca""
"According to him" → "According to the staff"
"is just what the radio needed at the moment" → "was just what the radio needed at the time of release"
"Similarly, Allison Stewart of" → "Similarly, Allison Stewart from the"
"Sean Piccoli and Lawrence A. Johnson of" → "Sean Piccoli and Lawrence A. Johnson of the"
"They further noted that the" → "The two of them further noted that the"
"consisted of 34 people, "The life" → "consisting of 34 people, opining that the "life"
"Geoff Boucher of" → "Geoff Boucher of the"
"and its accompanying music video" → "and accompanying music video" with the wikilink
"referencing Martin's 1999 single" → "in reference to Martin's 1999 single"
"Jose F. Promis of" → "Jose F. Promis from"
"and stated that is arguably" → "and stated that it is arguably"
"earned Martin a nomination for" → "was nominated for"
""She Bangs" was recognized" → "The track was recognized"
Wikilink International Dance Music Awards to itself instead
Remove target on 12"; similarly to how there is no target on pop in this section, there shouldn't be one on this term either
Done all, except the third query. Kept it simple. No need for 'widely'. — Tom(T2ME) 12:07, 22 June 2020 (UTC)


### Commercial performance
Mention where it was released to radio stations; remember, this sentence will still be moved to the previous section
Target Australian Singles Chart to ARIA Charts
"It spend six weeks in the top-ten" → "It spent 6 weeks in the top 10" per MOS:NUM
Exactly per that policy no. We keep 1-9 in prose and everything above with a number. — Tom(T2ME) 12:08, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Tomica "Comparable values should be all spelled out or all in figures, even if one of the numbers would normally be written differently: patients' ages were five, seven, and thirty-two or ages were 5, 7 and 32, but not ages were five, seven and 32." So in this case, yes. --Kyle Peake (talk) 07:26, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
That's a different situation, where you compare things. Here we don't compare things when talking about charting trajectory. I have done multiple FAs before and actually the preferred way is 1-9 words, above 9 numerical. Please read this. — Tom(T2ME) 08:55, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
I have read that and totally understand where you are coming from; I once felt that way, but ultimately realised otherwise and see Talk:Follow God/GA1 to understand what I am talking about since small numbers should not be spelt out in certain cases. --Kyle Peake (talk) 17:00, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
"before slowly started declining on it. It stayed" → "before slowly starting to decline on it, though lasted"
"It was certified platinum by the Australian Recording Industry Association (ARIA) denoting" → "The song was certified platinum by the Australian Recording Industry Association (ARIA), denoting"
"in the country alone" → "in the country"
"on October 15" → "on October 15, 2000"
"The next week the song reached" → "The next week, the song rose 15 places to"
"reaching its final peak of two on December 3" → "ultimately reaching its final peak of number two on December 3 of that year"
"It stayed on the chart" → "The song stayed on the chart"
"on November 4; similarly as in the previous nations charts" → "on November 4, 2000; similarly to the charts of other nations,"
"It was later certified silver" → "The song was later certified silver"
"the British Phonographic Industry (BPI) denoting" → "the British Phonographic Industry (BPI), indicating"
"In Continental Europe, it was most" → "In continental Europe, it was most" with the removed wikilink
[18][19] should both be solely at the end of the sentence
"the Swedish Singles Chart where it peaked at number one" → "the Swedish Singles Chart, peaking at number one on both of them" with the target
"Additionally, it was certified gold" → "Additionally, the song was certified gold"
"the Swedish Recording Industry Association (GLF) denoting" → "the Swedish Recording Industry Association (GLF), denoting"
"in Spain where it peaked at number two" → "in Spain, peaking at number two"
"it reached number three in Finland" → "while the song reached number three in Finland"
"number nine in Guatemala,[25] number five in Nicaragua,[26] and number one in Uruguay.[27]" → "number nine, five and one in Guatemala, Nicaragua and Uruguay, respectively.[25][26][27]"
"The song also reached number one" → "The song was also a chart topper"
"In the United States, "She Bangs" debuted at number 38" → ""She Bangs" debuted at number 38" since US shows it is the United States
Target to Billboard Hot 100 should be on the Billboard Hot 100 text instead
Mention the issue date of the debut
"on the chart it reached its peak of" → "on the chart, the track reached its peak of"
"the single has sold over 152,000 digital copies in the country alone" → "the track has sold over 152,000 digital copies in the US"
"It was more successful on the Hot Latin Songs chart[32] and the Tropical Songs chart where it reached peaks at number one" → "The track was more successful on the country's Hot Latin Songs and Tropical Songs charts, both of which it peaked at number one on,"
[32][33] should both be solely at the end of the sentence
"his fifth number-one song on the former chart" → "his fifth number one song on the former chart"
"It also peaked at number two on the" → "The track further peaked at number two on the US"
Target Latin Pop Songs to Latin Pop Airplay
[34][35] should both be solely at the end of the sentence
"on the Mainstream Top 40 chart" → "on the Mainstream Top 40"
"On the Adult Top 40 and Hot Dance Club Songs," → "On the Adult Top 40 and Hot Dance Club Songs charts,"
[36][37] should both be solely at the end of the sentence
"and 27 respectively" → "and 27, respectively"
"The single was more successful in Canada, where it reached" → "The track was more successful in Canada, reaching"
"The song experienced moderate chart success in Japan, where it peaked" → "It experienced moderate chart success in Japan, peaking"


### Music video
Section belongs as the one directly before Commerical performance instead
Nope. The order is Critical, Commercial, then Music video. Check a bunch of FA articles for further reference. — Tom(T2ME) 07:48, 22 June 2020 (UTC)


#### Development and synopsis
Img needs alt text
Wikilink music video to itself on the img text
"was shot at" → "was shot at the"
Remove wikilink on Bahamas
Ditto in the prose
"Isham has worked on some of Martin's previous videos including" → "Isham had worked on some of Martin's previous videos, including the ones for"
"to-be as part of a trilogy" → "as being part of a trilogy"
This sentence doesn't seem to be backed up by the ref from what I can see; but a subscription is required so may I assume good faith?
"he envisioned the video taking place" → "he envisioned the visual taking place"
"felt the Bahamas was the perfect place to film the video" → "felt that the Bahamas was the perfect place to film it"
"over 100 people was involved with the production of the film" → "over 100 people were involved in the production process"
Wikilink Hispanophone to itself
"market while the English version" → "market, while the English version"
Wikilink MTV to itself
"Making the Video the following day" → "Making the Video series the following day"
"to an underwater nightclub with Martin" → "to an underwater nightclub, with Martin"
"explained that the filming the scene" → "explained that filming the scene"
"long time; also he had to" → "long time, as well as having to"
"blowing bubbles of his mouth" → "blowing bubbles out of his mouth"
"Upon entering the nightclub Martin" → "Upon entering the nightclub, Martin"
"while dancing with the people" → "as he dances with the people"
"the club with several scenes" → "the club, with several scenes"
Target seduced to Seduction
"into a closet where he dances" → "into a closet, in which he dances"
"Near the end of the video" → "Near the end of the visual"
"The video concludes with him" → "The music video concludes with him"


#### Reception and controversy
"The explicit sexual scenes received criticism" → "The explicit sexual scenes of the music video were met with criticism"
"several American television station" → "several American television stations" with the target
"According to Daily Record's John Dingwall with the video the singer" → "According to the Daily Record's John Dingwall, with the visual, Martin"
"with a transformation to more mature one" → "by transforming to more mature one"
"The video was consequently banned" → "It was consequently banned"
"countries such as the Dominican Republic" → "countries, such as the Dominican Republic"
"Martin and Isham won the award for" → "the music video was awarded"
"In the same year, it was the" → "That same year, it won"


### Live performances
"Martin performed it on" → "he performed it on"
"Al Fin de Semana and Otro Rollo" → "Al Fin de Semana and Otro Rollo that same year"
"During the 2000 MTV Europe Music Awards" → "At the 2000 MTV Europe Music Awards"
"in tanks as he sings" → "in tanks while he sung"
"North American concert in 2001" → "North American concert of 2001"
Wikilink Los Angeles to itself
"was included in the" → "was included on the"
"for the 2011" → "for both Martin's 2011"
Done all, except wiki linking Los Angeles per WP:OVERLINK. No need to link it, it's a well-known city. — Tom(T2ME) 16:58, 5 July 2020 (UTC)


#### Cover versions
""She Bangs" has been covered by several contestants on various music talent shows." there are only two performances below so this is not backed up
"rendition was poorly received with" → "rendition was poorly received, with"
"that he had zero talent" and was" → "that Ronny B had "zero talent", and he was"


##### William Hung version
This should be sub-section of the already sub-section Cover versions, since it is a notable cover in itself
Target third season to American Idol (season 3)
"of American Idol" → "of American Idol in 2004"
"dancing. Simon Cowell interrupted" → "dancing, and Simon Cowell interrupted"
"gained a following his performance and signed on to" → "gained a following after his performance and ultimately signed to"
"recorded his cover of" → "released a cover of"
"on his debut album" → "on his debut studio album"
"(2004) which was panned" → "(2004), with the cover being generally panned"
"writes that Hung" → "wrote that Hung"
"being mildly retarded."" → "being mildly retarded"."
"called it the" → "said that it is the"
"injection you can get."" → "injection you can get"."
"Hung performance of the song" → "Hung's performance of the song"
"on Hung's cover" → "on the cover version"


### Credits and personnel
Target Mixed to Audio mixing (recorded music)
See the personnel guide and re-write accordingly
Target Songwriting to Songwriter instead
Target Recording engineers to Audio engineer, or engineering; depends which comes first in the new order
Acoustic Guitar → Acoustic guitar with the wikilink
Background Vocals → Background vocals
Baritone Saxophone → Baritone saxophone with the wikilink
Macintosh & Digital Programming → Macintosh and digital programming
Electric Guitar → Electric guitar with the wikilink
Drum & Rhythm Programming → Drum and rhythm programming
Additional Programming → Additional programming
Acoustic Solo → Acoustic solo
Electric Guitar Solo → Electric guitar solo
Tenor Saxophone → Tenor saxophone with the wikilink


### Charts
#### Weekly charts
See MOS:TABLECAPTION
Target Polish Airplay Charts to Polish music charts instead
Target Romanian Top 100 to Romanian record charts instead


#### Year-end charts
See MOS:TABLECAPTION, the caption will be different here though
Norway Christmas Period (VG-lista) → Norway (VG-lista), since Christmas was when the chart was released for year-end actually from the looks of it


### Certifications
See MOS:TABLECAPTION
Remove US from here, since there is no certification and it is just a number that is over 300,000 away from Gold anyway


### References
Make sure all of these are archived using the tool, especially the dead ones
Copyvio score looks good at 18.0%
Remove the publishers from ref 2 and 3
Cite MTV as publisher for ref 9 instead and remove the other publisher
Cite Broadcast Music, Inc. as publisher instead for ref 10
Fix MOS:QWQ issues with ref 12 and remove the publisher
Ref 16 should use Martin's URL instead and be retitled to Ricky Martin | full Official Chart History
Remove the publisher from refs 25, 26, 27, 28 and 51
Remove target on Billboard for ref 29 and delete the publisher; same for refs 48 and 96
Remove target on Billboard for ref 38
Fix MOS:CAPS issues with Imagen on ref 41 and wikilink to itself
Cite Terra Networks as publisher instead for ref 42 with target to Terra (company), while remove the other publisher
Remove ref 43's publisher
Remove wikilink on Daily Record for ref 45
Remove wikilink on El Siglo de Torreón for ref 46 and remove the publisher
Remove ref 47's publisher
Cite Univision as publisher instead on ref 49 and remove the other publisher
Remove the publisher from ref 50
Remove ref 52's wikilink on Daily Mirror and remove the publisher
Ref 54 should keep Bauer Media Group as publisher but remove the work/website since it's in the title
Ref 55 is not formatted correctly
Remove ref 56 and 57's publishers
Target Today to Today (American TV program) on ref 59
Cite CBS News as publisher instead for ref 60
Ref 61 is missing the publisher
Not sure if IGN should cite as publisher or work/website for ref 62?
Remove Stylus Magazine from the title of ref 63
Ref 64's author should be laid out the same as the other ones; ref 91 has this issue too
Cite MTV News as publisher for ref 65 instead with the wikilink
Remove wikilink on Columbia Records for ref 66
Remove wikilink to Music & Media for refs 76 and 77
Target Romanian Top 100 to Romanian record charts for ref 83
Remove wikilink on Australian Recording Industry Association for ref 87
Cite Recorded Music NZ as the publisher for ref 89 instead with the wiklink
Remove wikilink on VG-lista for ref 90
Ref 94 is marked as a permanent dead link; remove or replace
Target IFPI Denmark to IFPI Danmark on ref 95
Ref 97 needs an accessdate


### External links
Once the music videos have been added to the infobox, remove them from here


### Final comments and verdict
 On hold but won't be for too long since there are two of you to fix the issues! --Kyle Peake (talk) 08:07, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
My next day off work is Tuesday, so I'll get it on that day. Erick (talk) 02:49, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
@Magiciandude: Yeah I have no issue with that; depending on the time though, I may respond later on during the day since I'm going out. --Kyle Peake (talk) 09:55, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Magiciandude and Tomica, you two got any updates on this? --Kyle Peake (talk) 12:16, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
Gonna need at least another week to finish this. I worked on the music video today. Erick (talk) 04:04, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Magiciandude I was about to fail this due to it being on hold for over three weeks and because neither of you had responded to my comments from four days ago, but now there has been a response from you and may I ask what took so long? --Kyle Peake (talk) 05:35, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Well, you know, life happened. It's not that we are on Wikipedia all the time. Plus, you literally asked us to change nearly every sentence, which frankly, sometimes, I do not agree with some of the prose you are suggesting. So, yes, we will need some more time. — Tom(T2ME) 16:50, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Magiciandude and Tomica, I understand that you may oppose some of the prose I suggested to change because constructive criticism is acceptable and there were many changes suggested by me. However, this article has been left on hold for over two weeks since you asked for "some more time," so I will sadly have to ✗ Fail it. --Kyle Peake (talk) 10:27, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
@Kyle Peake: Hi, I tried to fix all the mentioned issues, and added some content. I'll be thankful if you check the article once again and tell me to fix the remaining issues that I missed. آرمین هویدایی (talk) 14:59, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:She Bangs/GA2. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: K. Peake (talk · contribs) 15:22, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

I will review this since it is the oldest unreviewed songs GAN and I was the reviewer the first time; I do regret somewhat how specific I was during GA reviews back then. --K. Peake 15:22, 5 April 2021 (UTC)


### Infobox and lead
Why is "Amor" listed before "Por Arriba, Por Abajo" under B-sides in the infobox when the track listing has the opposite order?
"The song is a dance track, with Latin music influences, while the lyrics" → "A dance track with Latin music influences, its lyrics" but should salsa be mentioned here too?
"a woman and is" → "a woman, and the song is"
"It received widely positive reviews" → "The song received widely positive reviews"
The word Grammy is not needed before nomination when the awards show is mentioned that same sentence
"The song was" → "The former was" to avoid confusion with "Livin' la Vida Loca"
"United Kingdom, and" → "the United Kingdom, and"
"was also recorded under" → "was recorded under"
It needs to be sourced directly in the body that the Spanish language version was the one that charted on the Hot Latin Songs chart, as the article itself says of the song's era "Songs on the chart were not necessarily in Spanish language"
You should mention at least one of the live performances directly before the video info, plus use "the original version" here
"for "She Bangs" was" → "for the song was"
"by several artists including" → "by several artists, including"
Mention what year he covered the song


### Background and release
"In 1999 and 2000," → "From 1999 to 2000,"
"fifth tour, Livin' la Vida Loca Tour to further promote" → "fifth tour the Livin' la Vida Loca Tour to promote"
"for his sixth studio album Sound Loaded." → "for Sound Loaded."
"name in an article" → "name as "She Bangs" in an article"
Pipe Spanish to Spanish language
"up in his career," and" → "up in his career", and" per MOS:QUOTE
"that there are possibilities that Martin might perform" → "the possibilities of Martin performing"
Pipe acoustic to Acoustic music
Change MTV channel to MTV
"Also Martin's publicist" → "Also, Martin's publicist"
"the music video was already shot" → "the song's music video had already been shot"
Remove wikilink on Bahamas
Mention the writers and producers here, as everything in the lead needs to be written out in the body
"Then it was released" → "Thereafter, the song was released" and shouldn't you be more specific than the markets, while following [6] still?
@Kyle Peake: I'm sorry, I tried to find at the time I was writing this section, but I couldn't find any information about the specific markets. آرمین هویدایی (talk) 08:01, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
آرمین هویدایی Do you think you can reword this part so it is less confusing though, without adding WP:OR of course? --K. Peake 08:18, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
Kyle Peake I'm not sure how should I write it, can you please suggest me any phrases that would be less confusing? آرمین هویدایی (talk) 08:35, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
آرمین هویدایی Maybe something like "released to the singles markets"? --K. Peake 08:49, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
"It was included as the first track on" → ""She Bangs" was included as the first track on Martin's sixth studio album Sound Loaded"


### Composition and lyrics
Audio sample text looks good!
""She Bangs" is a" → "Musically, "She Bangs" is a"
"features Latin music and salsa influences and" → "features Latin and salsa music influences, and"
Pipe Alfred Publishing Company to Alfred Music
Pipe key to Key (music)
"in common time signature, and with" → "in the time signature of common time, with"
Remove comma after D4 like I suggested in the first review
"trumpet blasts and" → "trumpet blasts, and"
Wikilink disco to itself
""equally inevitable driving"" → ""equally inevitable [...] driving"" per the source
Pipe single to Single (music)
"the singer's previous singles," → "the singer's previous singles"
"harder to hold."" → "harder to hold"." per MOS:QUOTE, as suggested in the first review
Pipe Big Bang Theory to Big Bang
"and explodes. She" → "and explodes [...] She" per the source
Replace the word "bark" with something more appropriate for here, as it is a comp section not reception


### Critical reception
Why is radio piped to airplay here instead of on its first mention in the opening section of the body?
"Also Taylor Mims from Billboard described" → "Also from Billboard, Taylor Mims described" but no ref is invoked for this review
Pipe pop to Pop music
"the song "glamorous"" → "the song "clamorous"" per the source
"opining that the "life" → "opining the "life"
Wikilink music video
Remove previous lead single introduction because we already know about "Livin' la Vida Loca"
"Orlando Sentinel's Jim Abbott" → "the Orlando Sentinel's Jim Abbott"
""bon-bon shakers"" → ""'bon-bon' shakers"." per the source and add a pipe to the song article instead, as the reference is not directly mentioning but it seems they alluding to it
The third greatest hit ranking can be kept but remove the quote from the background of the list per WP:UNDUE


#### Accolades
"concluded by calling the song" → "called the song" because this is the start of his opinion piece


### Commercial performance
"It spend 6 weeks" → "It spent 6 weeks"
"copies in the country." → "copies in Australia."
"to ultimately reaching its final peak of number two" → "to number 15, going on to reach its peak of number 2"
"November 4, 2000; similarly to the charts of other nations and" → "November 4, 2000, similarly to the charts of other nations, and"
"on the chart for" → "on the UK Singles Chart for" with the wikilink
"where it peaked at" → "charts, on which the song peaked at"
"it was certified gold" → "the song was certified gold"
"copies in the country." → "copies in Sweden."
"in the US and it is" → "in the United States and stands as" per MOS:US
Pipe Hot Dance Club Songs to Dance Club Songs
"at number 24 and 27," → "at numbers 24 and 27,"


### Music video
#### Development and synopsis
Img looks good!
"helped with the creative direction" → "was responsible for the creative direction"
Remove wikilink on MTV
"made an appearance in" → "makes an appearance in"
The among other dancers part is not sourced, but him being a bartender and behind Martin is so mention those things instead
"as the beginning" → "which was at the beginning"


#### Reception and controversy
"station cut the scenes" → "stations cut the scenes"
"to more mature one." → "to a more mature one."
"it won the" → "it won the award for"


### Live performances
Good


### Cover versions and appearances in media
Mention that season three was in 2008
Introduce David Hasselhoff's role on the show
"gave it a performance on" → "delivered a performance of "She Bangs" on"
Mention that season three was in 2020, while mention series seven being that same year
Lowercase the B-52 per MOS:THEMUSIC
"and was ranked as one of" → "Wagner was ranked as one of" as a new sentence, as the current one is too long


#### William Hung version
Introduce who William Hung is in the first sentence
"singing and dancing, and Simon Cowell" → "singing and dancing; judge Simon Cowell"
"the "best track but" → "the "best track... but" per the source
"of the song was" → "of the song is"
The joint performance of the song was at the Monte Carlo Theater in Las Vegas, so reword accordingly
"performed the song" → "performed the original"
"and explained: "Otherwise I" → "and explained that "otherwise I"


### Formats and track listings
Wikilink "Por Arriba, Por Abajo"
Pipe "Amor" to Amor (Ricky Martin song)


### Credits and personnel
Brackets are missing closure for Indianapolis
Despite being sourced here, Glenn Monroig, Julia Sierra and Daniel López are not mentioned as songwriters in the infobox for some reason


### Charts
#### Weekly charts
The Nielsen SoundScan chart for Canada actually leads to digital songs, so remove this since it is not notable when the song reached main charts in the country and also take it out of commercial performance
Europe (European Hot 100 Singles) → European Hot 100 Singles (Billboard)
Change Mahasz to Music & Media with the wikilink


#### Year-end charts
Good


### Certifications
Good


### References
Copyvio score looks decent at 32.0%
Make sure all of these are archived by using the tool
Ref 1 needs to cite the original URL too
Ditto for ref 2, plus the archive does not seem to work for me
Pipe Billboard to Billboard (magazine) and Nielsen Business Media to Nielsen Holdings on ref 4
Remove pipe on Billboard for ref 6
Middle names should be cited directly after the first ones for refs 15 and 19
Change MTV to MTV News on ref 20, citing as publisher instead
WP:OVERLINK of Nielsen Business Media on ref 44
If ref 52 is a dead link then it can be kept per the GA guidelines, but is this really the case or is it the wrong URL? Also, remove the publisher.
Pipe Terra Networks to Terra (company) on ref 53
Remove or replace ref 56 per WP:RSP
Ref 57 and ref 51 are duplicates
WP:OVERLINK of Univision on ref 61
Wikilink Daily Mirror on ref 64
Ref 70 should be dated in 2008 not 2006
WP:OVERLINK of Entertainment Weekly on ref 72
Remove or replace ref 79 since it is unreliable, as looking at the URL cited from 2004 and scrolling through the homepage of current articles shows literally the same author for all of them, plus this looks like a gossip site
Remove ref 111 since AllMusic is not reliable for peaks
Pipe Fundación Autor-SGAE to Sociedad General de Autores y Editores on ref 116, unless that is not the correct article


### External links
Good


### Final comments and verdict
 On hold until all of the issues are fixed; glad to have reviewed this twice! --K. Peake 10:10, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
@Kyle Peake: Thanks a lot for devoting your time on it. I fixed all the issues, I hope I have not missed anything. آرمین هویدایی (talk) 13:33, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
آرمین هویدایی You still need to write out the songwriters and producers in the background section per my comment about the lead's content being in the body but otherwise, nice job on implementing the suggestions! --K. Peake 17:17, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
@Kyle Peake: Done, thanks again. 19:12, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
آرمین هویدایی  Pass now, I did make a fix where you had not listed the full stage name for the second mention of one of the songwriters. It is a great contrast for me to have gone from the failure of the first review to this one's pass; I'm sure the original nominators will be so proud of you and me somewhat too!!! --K. Peake 20:21, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
@Kyle Peake: Thank you so much, and I'm very glad to hear that. آرمین هویدایی (talk) 20:31, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

Are these the credits for this one song, or for the entire album? There were really 30 production staff for one song?? Martinevans123 (talk) 14:28, 12 October 2021 (UTC)