# Talk:Ontario Highway 40

This review is transcluded from Talk:Ontario Highway 40/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: The Rambling Man (talk · contribs) 09:36, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

Comments

"depression-relief project" is there a link, if not for this explicitly, the depression?
""section would be decommissioned" why "would be" when "was" works wonderfully?
Something something Einstein frame of reference.
Could link Interchange (road) (we don't really have those here).
Now I'm really curious as to "here". I assumed you were from the U.K. until now, to be honest.
Ok, we have "junctions" but we don't refer to them as "interchanges", if  that makes sense, so linking it first time would be best. The Rambling Man (Stay alert! Control the virus! Save lives!!!!) 06:56, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
"within the Municipality of" capital M?
"a 30 hectares (74 acres) "" -> adj=on
Is it Chatham-Kent or Chatham–Kent?
It's whatever "-" is hehe. I've made it consistent to that.
"north parallel to and several kilometres east" comma after north.
"divided four lane expressway" link?
And shouldn't four-lane be hyphenated in this usage as it's modifying "expressway"?
I've never been sure if a hyphen gets used for "four lane" vs. "four-laned"
"the spring of 1934" avoid seasons, they differ depending on where you are on the planet.
Been waiting to die on this hill :D The topic is noted as being in the northern hemisphere, isn't that enough to determine the seasons? I feel like it would be too wordy to say "between March and June" or similar for every case where I can't narrow something down to a specific month. If language can be regional, surely seasons can be just the same.
It's not a big issue.   MOS:SEASON recommends we avoid it, but if a reader can link Canada to the northern hemisphere and then associate spring with that region, I  guess we're all ok. The Rambling Man (Stay alert! Control the virus! Save lives!!!!) 06:56, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
MLA, I don't  know what that is, expand it before using the initialism.
"following World War II, automobile" no need to link the war.
But then how could one end up looking up something that has nothing to do with what they initially searched? I link it in most other articles, so this one I'm going to respectfully decline.
It's probably the most unnecessarily overlinked article in Wikipedia, and is of practically no relevance, but meh, one useless link's not going to kill anyone... The Rambling Man (Stay alert! Control the virus! Save lives!!!!) 06:56, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
"result, freeways and" you link freeway here, I'd do it earlier.
No opportunity for it. I think it works better setting it up with those two links grouped together, rather than only linking "bypass".
"an interchange at" likewise.
Turns out it is, and this instance is overlink.
Saint Lawrence -> St. Lawrence (consistency, and that's what our article is called).
Surprisingly it wasn't until I boldly moved them a few days ago! Not one source uses "Saint"
"navigable lock system" link lock?
"" the Aamjiwnaang First Nation (then" overlilnked.
"entire $12.6 million" I would advise add C to this $ just in case (assuming it is Canadian dollars??)
"Minister Snow was late to the ceremony due to a snowstorm" He was late... (sorry!)
But... but... but... :) That was for a DYK.
"Third Street bridge" not Bridge?
Just a bridge on Third Street, no official name.
""on May 1, 1963[20] and"" comma after year.
"as Highway 40.[25][24]"   order.
"into a one-way pair with" overlinked.
That's all for now, so it's on hold. The Rambling Man (Stay alert! Control the virus! Save lives!!!!) 15:56, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

Responses indented within your comments. Everything I didn't specifically respond to has been fixed. Just down to the issues w.r.t. seasons, linking WW2 and freeway. - Floydian τ ¢ 03:38, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
All good,  I've responsed a bit above, but no further  action required.  Cheers. The Rambling Man (Stay alert! Control the virus! Save lives!!!!) 06:56, 19 May 2021 (UTC)