# Talk:True Detective

This looks like another page where Amakuru moved the article but not the talk page.  They ought to be moved together, and that is the default action for a move. --David Biddulph (talk) 15:56, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

@David Biddulph: apologies again. The problem is that if the target talk page has a nontrivial history (i.e. a non-administrator would not be able to move to that talk page location), then the talk page doesn't move with the article even if you tick the box to say move it. The target talk page has to be deleted first, and separately, just as an article would be. I'm quite new as an admin, and this problem never arose when I used to move pages in my non-admin days, because if the talk page can't be moved, then most likely the article can't be either. I will make sure to keep an eye on this more in future. I've now moved this talk page as required, anyway. Thanks  — Amakuru (talk) 17:12, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

This article has an entire section based on plagiarism accusations from Mike Davis from Lovecraft eZine. Given that it's a hugely successful television series, there will be a wide spread of opinions and criticism. Is Lovecraft eZine/Mike Davis really that central that it makes sense to have a section on plagiarism based on his reading of the series? This feels like a case of WP:UNDUE to me. /Julle (talk) 01:29, 24 September 2022 (UTC)

I boldly removed this for now, since no one had replied so far. /Julle (talk) 13:26, 27 September 2022 (UTC)

I already posted this on Talk:True_Detective_(season_4), but it's probably more appropriate here.  Why is the episode "Charlie Work" from the series It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia listed as a related page at the bottom?  What part of this is related to that episode (or IASIP in general)?
- Ambndms (talk) 02:17, 13 February 2024 (UTC)

Per the article for "Charlie Work", the IASIP episode was inspired by the long take from "Who Goes There". I don't think that makes it's worth having in the TD template just for that reason. It would make more sense just to include that information in the article for "Who Goes There" instead. Drovethrughosts (talk) 13:45, 13 February 2024 (UTC)

We do not report on IMDB's user grading which has repeatedly been shown to be easily manipulatable by internet trolls. And the second source discusses the final episode not the season as a whole, and it STILL states "excited some fans while making others outraged" which is NOT the same as a mixed audience reception: that sentence could be true even if, for example, the number of outraged fans numbered in the thousands while the number of excited ones number in the millions (or vice versa).
Removing undue emphasis from lead, especially since this is the article of the show as a whole and not the article on the specific "divisive" episode. CapnZapp (talk) 07:37, 27 February 2024 (UTC)