# Talk:Riley's Lock

This review is transcluded from Talk:Riley's Lock/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Tim riley (talk · contribs) 20:47, 9 October 2021 (UTC)

I peer reviewed this article some weeks ago and found nothing much to quibble about. I suppose in the interests of full disclosure I should add that to the best of my knowledge I am no connection with the Riley of Riley's Lock, and, that done, I am pleased to promote this article, which seems to me to meet all the GA criteria: Tim riley talk 20:47, 9 October 2021 (UTC)


### Overall summary
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality: 

B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists: 

Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources: 
Well referenced.
B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary: 
Well referenced.
C. No original research: 

Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects: 

B. Focused: 

Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias: 

Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc: 

Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales: 
Well illustrated.
B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions: 
Well illustrated.
Overall:
Pass or Fail: 

@Tim riley: Thank you so much! TwoScars (talk) 18:48, 10 October 2021 (UTC)