# Talk:William Johnstone Hope

Warships are (I understand) held to be inherently notable, and the ships project is pretty active, to me it seems to be doing a disservice to readers to remove the redlinks which are very likely to turn blue in time, either by delinking entirely, or pointing to a disambiguation page (though it least in this case there is some hope that they will find thier way tot he article once written reasonably easily, and will at elast get some basic info in the meantime).  David Underdown (talk) 08:17, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:William Johnstone Hope/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.


### Style
Very monotone writting, it almost sent me sleeping. I will contact a copy-editor to take a look at it. Otherwise it's OK. Wandalstouring (talk) 12:44, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

I suggest an A-class review after the copy-edits have been done by RC-0722‎ (talk · contribs). Wandalstouring (talk) 12:50, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
RC admits his copy-editing is abit rusty, but he is finished. Let's leave it at that. Wandalstouring (talk) 12:01, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
Thankyou to you both.--Jackyd101 (talk) 12:46, 19 July 2008 (UTC)