# Talk:Tribalistas (2002 album)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Tribalistas (2002 album)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer:Ieslie Ieslie (talk · contribs) 01:17, 18 April 2025 (UTC)

Hi! I am going to review this article. I'll try to make this a slightly speedy process, whoever has nominated this, please let me know if you have any questions! It's my first time reviewing, so please have patience :)
Background: Looks pretty good, enough citations, and concise recap of each separate singer's background prior to the album's creation.
Recording and production: "Monte brought to the studio a demo tape containing drafts of lyrics that she had previously started working on alone or something she had begun creating with Brown on another occasion but had not had the opportunity to finish." This section has some slight grammar issues, but there are plenty citations, so that's pretty good.
Musical style:"Similarly, Matt Cibula, from PopMatters, felt the album displays the combination of Monte's pop style, Brown's Afro-inspired approach, and Antunes' experimentalism, resulting in what he described as a ménage à trois of Brazil's three musical centers and three major music trends.[24]" This sentence presents more of a receptional-type piece of information. Should be pasted into the Reception part of this article. Slight issues with grammar as well, but overall good.
Title, release and cover: Good! Exceptional use of citations, and no grammar issues to be found.
Promotion: Good layout, fair amount of citations.
Singles: No issues to be found. An even fair use of citations, and evenly spaced out paragraphs.
Reception: Good. The passage box makes the layout look balanced.
Commercial performance: Pretty good! Lots of citations and paragraphs evenly laid out.
Charts Remove the "Country—" from the chart table. Overall, everything else looks fine.
Certifications: Good!
Release history: Evenly laid out.
Overall Pass/Fail: Pass! :)
Final comments: Overall, the article looks great! It has a good and wide broad coverage, and has a fair amount of citations for every section. I'll promote this to GA! Please adhere to my previous suggestions as well. Congrats!