# Talk:St Ceidio's Church, Rhodogeidio

This review is transcluded from Talk:St Ceidio's Church, Rhodogeidio/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 11:18, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.
Disambiguations: none found
Linkrot: none found Jezhotwells (talk) 11:19, 14 February 2011 (UTC)


### Checking against GA criteria
GA review (see here for criteria)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose):  b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): 

It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 
the references which are accessible to me check out, assume GF for others
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 
I guess you have as much as is available.  A plan would be good, but not a GA requirement.
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 

It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 

Overall:
Pass/Fail: 
Another pass, Congratulations! Jezhotwells (talk) 14:27, 14 February 2011 (UTC)