# Talk:Trinidad euphonia

This review is transcluded from Talk:Trinidad euphonia/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Starsandwhales (talk · contribs) 01:05, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

Hi! I'll be reviewing this article for the next few days/weeks! I might not to reply that promptly but I'll try to answer any questions after a day or two. starsandwhales (talk) 01:05, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

"It is sometimes considered to be a superspecies with the scrub, yellow-crowned and purple-throated euphonias." --> for more information, could you way 'why' it is considered to be a superspecies with these others?
Is my explanation sufficient, or does it need more info? MeegsC (talk) 15:31, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
I also found a 2020 genetic study that further clarifies this relationship. MeegsC (talk) 15:55, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
8This is really good! Very understandable to someone who doesn't know what these mean! :D starsandwhales (talk) 00:09, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
"It is largely allopatric with latter species, though it does overlap in a narrow zone in eastern Venezuela." --> since this just seems to be a wiktionary link, also including the definition of allopatric in the sentence would make it clearer
I've reworded this to say "Its range is largely distinct (allopatric) from that of the latter species, overlapping only in a narrow zone in eastern Venezuela." Does that work, or do I need to change it further? MeegsC (talk) 13:34, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
Personally I'd do a slight rewording to "Its range is largely distinct, or allopatric, from that of the latter species, overlapping only in a narrow zone in eastern Venezuela." but that's not really necessary.
"Females are virtually indistinguishable from female purple-throated euphonias (which have a slight grayish tinge to the upperparts) and both they and immature birds are probably not separable in the field." --> probably according to whom? "probably" isn't a very encyclopedia-y word if you know what I mean
I've changed the wording to "not thought to be separable in the field". The reference at the end of the sentence says "probably", but I've made it more "encyclopedia-y". ;) MeegsC (talk) 20:59, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
Distribution and habitat section is good
Could you find an image of the eggs?
Unfortunately, I haven't been able to source a photo or drawing of the eggs. MeegsC (talk) 20:59, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
AGF for book sources, the other sources look good
Though it isn't necessary, alt text for images would help with accessibility.
Done.
"It has a circular entrance in the side and is lined with finer material." --> what's an example of finer material?
The sources say only "finer materials". Given that they also says the nest is composed of grass and stems, I assume it is finer bits of those materials. MeegsC (talk) 13:47, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
Do juveniles have any variation in diet compared to the adults?
None of the sources indicate anything about juvenile diet. MeegsC (talk) 20:59, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
What are the time frames when these birds mature?
I've added the generation length. I can find nothing about when breeding first occurs. I assume it's the summer following the bird's hatching (i.e. when more than 1 year old), but it would be OR to say so. MeegsC (talk) 14:17, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
Conservation status looks good
Starsandwhales, I think I've addressed all of your concerns. MeegsC (talk) 15:59, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

Everything looks good! I'm going to look at everything again tomorrow, but you should be alright. starsandwhales (talk) 00:09, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

Congrats on the new GA! starsandwhales (talk) 20:03, 8 April 2021 (UTC)