# Talk:The Sensorites

I am aware that the information about one episode being postponed could have been put elsewhere, but to do this would necessitate a clumsy re-write of the weekly transmission details. The way I have written it still fits into the Doctor Who template well enough.

Please note that the masthead image here, File:Sensorites.jpg is being discussed for deletion at Wikipedia:Non-free_content_review#File:Sensorites.jpg  Andy Dingley (talk) 02:37, 28 November 2013 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:The Sensorites/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Auldhouse (talk · contribs) 17:05, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

I'd be glad to review this article. Auldhouse (talk) 17:05, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it well written?
A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct: 
Yes. I ran the text through Grammarly and made a few minor copy-edits.
B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation: 
Yes. And sections also map nicely with other Dr. Who serial entries.
Is it verifiable with no original research?
A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline: 

B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines: 

C. It contains no original research: 

D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism: 

Is it broad in its coverage?
A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic: 

B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style): 

Is it neutral?
It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each: 

Is it stable?
It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute: 

Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content: 

B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions: 

Overall:
Pass or Fail: Pass 
Congratulations! Another GA article for Dr. Who.