# Talk:Where You Want to Be

We don't allow the subjects of Wikipedia articles to determine the content of said articles. What would Wikipedia be like if, say, George W. Bush said "You know, I think that the criticism of me is bullcrap", and then we removed all criticism of him from our article? Just because the band members think that TBS isn't emo, or that emo is a bad idea for a genre, does not mean that the information should not be in the article. (And, by the way, I absolutely love Taking Back Sunday. Fantastic band. But I'm afraid that they really do fit the criteria of emo.) Any thoughts? Matt Yeager ♫ (Talk?) 03:48, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

I've just never been a fan of the term 'emo'. Not because of personal experinces or anything, but I consider it to be more of an insult than a genre. But then gothic is sometimes used as an insult but is still a genre. So, I understand and agree that it should be kept their.
Thoraxcorp 02:39, 16 April 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for responding! Matt Yeager ♫ (Talk?) 04:14, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
The thing is what defines emo?  Is it the way it sounds?  The lyrics?  Darthgriz98 18:23, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

They both kind of go together. Most people can, in about a minute, tell whether or not a band is "emo" (regardless of whether they use that particular title to name it).  And TBS qualifies. Matt Yeager ♫ (Talk?) 03:46, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
Emo was a style of music in the 90's. See Sunny Day Real Estate, early Jimmy Eat World, Mineral if you want to talk about emo. Now it's being used by the media to describe the kids you see wearing MCR shirts because people seem to think that emo means emotional. No, it means emotional hardcore. Oh and this band are not emo, they are yet another band that have been wrongly given this tag. :)  Hakmexul 18:52, 7. april 2008 (UTC)

Image:Taking back sunday where you want to be.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 21:17, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

Image:Taking back sunday where you want to be.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 21:27, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Where You Want to Be. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130322142732/http://www.fmqb.com/Article.asp?id=16771 to http://www.fmqb.com/Article.asp?id=16771
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.absolutepunk.net/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:34, 14 June 2017 (UTC)