# Talk:U.S. Route 9 in Delaware

This review is transcluded from Talk:U.S. Route 9 in Delaware/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Rp0211 (talk · contribs) 18:37, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose):  b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): 
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 
Overall:
Pass/Fail: 


### Infobox
No issues


### Lead
No issues


### Route description
No issues


### History
No issues


### Major intersections
No issues


### References
No issues

After thoroughly reviewing this article, I believe it meets all of the requirements for good article status. There were no disambiguation issues, link errors, formatting errors, or prose issues that I could find. Congratulations and keep up the good work! Rp0211 (talk2me) 18:48, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

From the Delaware route 9 article, there is a cross reference to here (US 9 in Delaware).  So could someone put in a cross reference FROM here TO Delaware route 9.  This does not affect the cross-reference already provided from here to article about full length of US 9.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.63.16.20 (talk) 16:09, 6 August 2013 (UTC) 

I really don't see the purpose to add a cross reference to this article because most people won't think of DE 9 as US 9. On the other hand, U.S. highways are sometimes treated in the same vein as state highways so someone might think of US 9 as DE 9. Dough4872 00:06, 7 August 2013 (UTC)