# Talk:Solaris (video game)

"Most other 2600 games were developed in the course of merely a couple of weeks."
I'm pretty sure this isn't correct, as wasn't one of the main problems with 'ET' the short development time, which wasn't standard practice? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 218.101.90.125 (talk • contribs) 10:40, 17 September 2006  (UTC)

Sounds pretty baseless, and I've removed it as such until someone can cite a reliable source for such a bold remark.  Can't sleep, clown will eat me 10:16, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

"The game was programmed by Douglas Neubauer, who owns the copyright to the game and the Solaris trademark."
I thought Sun Microsystems owned the Solaris trademark for computer game programs.[1] --Damian Yerrick (talk | stalk) 19:15, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

Added a link to a text-rendering of the game's manual, and also updated the play section accordingly. 87.68.31.236 (talk) 15:33, 16 October 2009 (UTC)

I've removed the Dev which changed to Atari Corporation in the infobox by @Dgpop:. While I don't think their actions were malicious or anything, this game has a strange history as it in development during the period of Atari Inc., cancelled, worked on a bit by Neumauer on his own, then brought back when Atari Corporation becomes its own thing. The Weiss citation doesn't clarify this (it just says "Atari"), and as this game moved around between a few, I'm not sure if listing one Atari over the others as a "dev" in the infobox is clear. I'm proposing to lead it blank as the prose itself goes into the complicated history of this games development, and as its a special case, I don't think we should state one single Atari as a dev, or even list both as its something that really needs to be clarified by reading the article. Thoughts Dgpop? Andrzejbanas (talk) 18:14, 7 January 2025 (UTC)