# Talk:William Fuller (American football)

The article has failed please expand in references, provide images, and expand the article after that it probably would pass, cheers. Lakers 04:40, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

There generally isn't much info about Fuller (he didn't have an article until a month ago), also no free images seem to exist:[1], and the article is tremendously well sourced. WP:WIAGA allows for shorter articles (criteria 3), the important question is whether any important information is left out. As the criteria states: "it addresses all major aspects of the topic" which this article does (not every article can be 20+kbs it's wrong to assume they even can be). I feel your review was hasty and I'm going to re-list it. However, I'll wait a day or two for your comments. Quadzilla99 07:17, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
I apologize for my mistake, good point it has passed now that you have clarified whatever was contested however if this was to go to FA I don't think it would make it unless you were aiming for GA only, regards. Lakers 07:20, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
Thanks, I didn't see any books on there. I'll keep an eye out for one and maybe I can get it through my library. The Houston Chronicle's online archives were helpful somewhat, but like I said there wasn't much more than "Fuller recorded two sacks" or "Fuller is likely to make the Pro Bowl" kind of mentions in the articles. Quadzilla99 07:39, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
I only found two, [2] and [3] Lakers 08:01, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

This discussion is transcluded from Talk:William Fuller (American football)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.
This article has been reviewed as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force. I believe the article meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. The article history has been updated to reflect this review. Regards, --Jackyd101 (talk) 22:33, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose):  b (MoS): 
Prose is of a high standard, although remember that numbers less than ten should be written using letters rather than numerals. --Jackyd101 (talk) 22:33, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
a (fair representation):  b (all significant views): 
It is stable.

It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
a (tagged and captioned):  b (lack of images does not in itself exclude GA):  c (non-free images have fair use rationales): 
Images would be very nice nad it is a shame the article is currently without any.--Jackyd101 (talk) 22:33, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
Overall:
a Pass/Fail: 

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:William Fuller (American football)/CommentsTalk:William Fuller (American football)/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
Substituted at 22:06, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on William Fuller (American football). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070207231826/http://www.databasefootball.com/players/playerpage.htm?ilkid=FULLEWIL01 to http://www.databasefootball.com/players/playerpage.htm?ilkid=FULLEWIL01
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:49, 9 June 2017 (UTC)