# Talk:San Diego

The bicycling paragraph of the transportation section needs an update, problem sentences:
"San Diego's roadway system provides an extensive network of routes for travel by bicycle"
Bicyclists are able to use roadways in a large majority of states and all U.S. cities have extensive road networks (covering all of there developed area), this statement should be removed as it does not describe the unique characteristics of san diego cycling infrastructure.  
"Testament to San Diego's cycling efforts, in 2006, San Diego was rated as the best city for cycling for U.S. cities with a population over 1 million.[211]"
this is a very out of date reference, multiple more recent sources rank San diego average or below average in bicycle infrastructure, number of bicyclists and fatalities.
http://www.aarp.org/content/dam/aarp/livable-communities/documents-2014/2014-Bike-Walk-Benchmarking-Report.pdf
https://www.walkscore.com/CA/San_Diego
" Older and denser neighborhoods around the downtown tend to be friendlier to utility cycling. This is partly because of the grid street patterns now absent in newer developments farther from the urban core, where suburban style arterial roads are much more common"
Several older more urban communities have blocked the development of bicycle infrastructure
http://fox5sandiego.com/2015/03/25/debate-stirs-over-proposed-hillcrest-bike-lanes/
http://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/2015/sep/23/coronado-bike-lanes/
I propose the entire paragraph be replaced with:
The dry and mild climate of San Diego makes cycling a convenient and pleasant year-round option.   The city has some segregated cycle facilities, particularly in newer developments, however the majority of road facilities specifically for bicycles are painted on regular roadways.  The city's hilly, canyoned terrain and long average trip distances—brought about by strict low-density zoning laws—somewhat restrict cycling for utilitarian purposes.  In 2014 .9% of commuters traveled by bicycle, below the average 1% for large U.S. cities.  Also in 2014, San Diego experienced 6.8 bicyclist fatalities per 10,000 cyclist commuters, the average for all large cities was 4.7.    — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.172.73.102 (talk) 21:39, 9 December 2015 (UTC) 

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on San Diego. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090131075226/http://www.bikechattanooga.org:80/BicyclingMagazineRecognizesChattanoogainTop21Cities.html to http://www.bikechattanooga.org/BicyclingMagazineRecognizesChattanoogainTop21Cities.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 14:00, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

The archived source is fine. Thanks, bot. --MelanieN (talk) 23:03, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

The median age was 32; two-thirds of the population was under 35.
Unless 1/6 of the population is between the ages of 32 and 34, which is very unlikely, this is incorrect.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.38.190.9 (talk) 22:02, 2 March 2016 (UTC) 

Thanks for catching that. It is what the source said, but as you point out it can't be right. I found a better source for this kind of information. --MelanieN (talk) 23:01, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

You are invited to the annual picnic of San Diego-area Wikimedians on Saturday, July 9. Join us! --Worldbruce (talk) 22:21, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

1) Link is ok, but the Title is uninformative

Title should be updated
"Official website" >> "City of San Diego Official Website"
2) Demographic Fact Sheet

Link should be updated
http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/06/0666000.html >> https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/table/PST045215/0666000
3) History of San Diego from San Diego Historical Society

Link should be updated, (without repeating twice same link)
http://sandiegohistory.org/index.html >> http://sandiegohistory.org/
4) San Diego Unified School District

Link should be updated
https://www.sandiegounified.org/Page/1 >> https://www.sandiegounified.org
D.Nino (talk) 22:58, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

I've made changes to #2–4. #1 works indirectly, through Wikidata, via a template. It's possible to re-title it, via setting a parameter; but I'd wait on consensus for doing that. Dhtwiki (talk) 04:35, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
Thanks, #1 I've realized later. It's OK. 
D.Nino (talk) 05:10, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 17 external links on San Diego. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141103002921/http://www.calafco.org/docs/Cities_by_incorp_date.doc to http://www.calafco.org/docs/Cities_by_incorp_date.doc
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110721183215/http://tps.cr.nps.gov/nhl/detail.cfm?ResourceID=130&resourceType=Site to http://tps.cr.nps.gov/nhl/detail.cfm?ResourceID=130&resourceType=Site
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131105164754/http://www.10news.com/news/report-san-diego-has-9th-best-parks-among-survey-of-50-us-cities-06052013 to http://www.10news.com/news/report-san-diego-has-9th-best-parks-among-survey-of-50-us-cities-06052013
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121119013741/http://www.dfg.ca.gov/biogeodata/atlas/pdf/Clim_12b_web.pdf to http://www.dfg.ca.gov/biogeodata/atlas/pdf/Clim_12b_web.pdf
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130724021112/http://www.cee.mtu.edu/~reh/papers/pubs/non_Honrath/michalski03_GL017015.pdf to http://www.cee.mtu.edu/~reh/papers/pubs/non_Honrath/michalski03_GL017015.pdf
Added archive https://archive.is/20160602200744/http://www.census.gov/popest/data/cities/totals/2015/SUB-EST2015.html to http://www.census.gov/popest/data/cities/totals/2015/SUB-EST2015.html
Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/69hd5KAIE?url=http://www.census.gov/population/www/documentation/twps0076/twps0076.html to http://www.census.gov/population/www/documentation/twps0076/twps0076.html
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.toddclever.com/about
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110514203636/http://www.sandi.net/20451072095932967/site/default.asp to http://www.sandi.net/20451072095932967/site/default.asp
Corrected formatting/usage for http://infodome.sdsu.edu/research/libdirectory/index.shtml
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110807125001/https://www.tvb.org/market_profiles to http://www.tvb.org/market_profiles
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130724071539/http://www.511sd.com/About511.aspx to http://www.511sd.com/About511.aspx
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130724072825/http://san.org/sdcraa/airport_initiatives/adp/default.aspx to http://www.san.org/sdcraa/airport_initiatives/adp/default.aspx
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.sister-cities.org/icrc/directory/usa/CA
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.edinburgh.gov.uk/internet/city_living/CEC_twin_and_partner_cities
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120614133841/http://www.edinburgh.gov.uk/info/695/council_information_performance_and_statistics/685/european_international_and_parliamentary_relations/3 to http://www.edinburgh.gov.uk/info/695/council_information_performance_and_statistics/685/european_international_and_parliamentary_relations/3
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.welcome.city.yokohama.jp/eng/tourism/mame/a3000.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:05, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 11 external links on San Diego. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091015143257/http://history.sandiego.edu/gen/local/kearny/page00d.html to http://history.sandiego.edu/gen/local/kearny/page00d.html
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090116150148/http://globaltwitcher.auderis.se/artspec.asp?thingid=62498 to http://globaltwitcher.auderis.se/artspec.asp?thingid=62498
Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/6AFdS3nvA?url=http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/06/0666000.html to http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/06/0666000.html
Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/6AFdS3nvA?url=http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/06/0666000.html to http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/06/0666000.html
Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/6AFdS3nvA?url=http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/06/0666000.html to http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/06/0666000.html
Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/6AFdS3nvA?url=http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/06/0666000.html to http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/06/0666000.html
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110506001856/http://www.sandiego.gov/economic-development/sandiego/economy.shtml to http://www.sandiego.gov/economic-development/sandiego/economy.shtml
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120505182218/http://www.visitsandiego.com/resources/CPW12/2-SanDiego.pdf to http://www.visitsandiego.com/resources/CPW12/2-SanDiego.pdf
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120207005402/http://www.inthecitysandiego.com/whale-watching-in-san-diego.html to http://www.inthecitysandiego.com/whale-watching-in-san-diego.html
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110718230807/http://www.business.ca.gov/Portals/0/AdditionalResources/Reports/iHub%20Writeups-San%20Diego.pdf to http://www.business.ca.gov/Portals/0/AdditionalResources/Reports/iHub%20Writeups-San%20Diego.pdf
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100720073815/http://www.sandiego.gov/mayortransition/index.shtml to http://www.sandiego.gov/mayortransition/index.shtml
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:29, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

When I lived in San Diego, I heard (and witnessed) the chestnut that temperature there rose an average of one degree for every mile inland you went, i.e., if it was 72 deg at the beach, then a mile inland it would be 73 deg, and so forth. This proved remarkably and consistently accurate.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.158.48.160 (talk) 09:30, 28 June 2017 (UTC) 

Interesting, and has an element of truth since it is unquestionably warmer the further inland you go. But if we don't have a reliable source for this we can't use it in the article.  --MelanieN (talk) 17:00, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on San Diego. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://archive.is/20130204070303/http://theheritagegroup.com/wp-content/press/062705.php to http://theheritagegroup.com/wp-content/press/062705.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:45, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on San Diego. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added {{dead link}} tag to http://wwworigin.weather.com/outlook/weather-news/news/articles/americas-best-climates-poll_2010-10-19?page=3
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160424040957/http://www.sdrealestatehub.com/san-diego-homes-for-sale/ to http://www.sdrealestatehub.com/san-diego-homes-for-sale/
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130724065947/http://m.utsandiego.com/news/2012/dec/26/citys-homeless-problem-still-needs-attention/ to http://m.utsandiego.com/news/2012/dec/26/citys-homeless-problem-still-needs-attention/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:04, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on San Diego. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081227170026/http://md1.csa.com/partners/viewrecord.php?requester=gs&collection=ENV&recid=6707765&q=wildfire+%22san+diego+%22&uid=&setcookie=yes to http://md1.csa.com/partners/viewrecord.php?requester=gs&collection=ENV&recid=6707765&q=wildfire+%22san+diego+%22&uid=&setcookie=yes
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100925092240/http://oldglobe.org/history/index.aspx to http://www.oldglobe.org/history/index.aspx
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.homesurfer.com/crimereports/view/crime_report.cfm?state=CA&area=San%20Diego
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071023025612/http://tvb.org/rcentral/markettrack/archivebymarket.asp?marketid=168 to http://www.tvb.org/rcentral/markettrack/archivebymarket.asp?marketid=168
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:10, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

Should the controversial Cerutti Mastodon site be mentioned in the prehistoric section? Kdammers (talk) 15:28, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

Please see: Talk:Los_Angeles#Climate_data_-_problem. Subtropical-man (talk / en-2) 22:42, 10 November 2018 (UTC)

San Diego translates to Saint James in Spanish.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diego
San Diego translates to (Saint) Didacus in Latin, not Spanish. 
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Didacus
A Spanish guy went by the name San Didacus.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Didacus_of_Alcal%C3%A1  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:8801:C500:A30:B1D7:99FE:77:92AA (talk) 23:17, 2 February 2019 (UTC) 

Thanks for your note. It’s true that Diego as a name is usually thought of as comparable to James. However, according to scholarly sources, that is not the case with the saint. When the Catholic Church went to canonize a Franciscan father named Diego, who was a teacher at the University of Alcalá, they used Didacus as his saint name. [1][2] Sebastian Vizcaino named the Bay and the area after his favorite saint, San Diego de Alcalá, known to the Catholic Church as Saint Didacus of Alcalá. -- MelanieN (talk) 00:40, 3 February 2019 (UTC)

Water is supplied by the Public Utilities Department of the City of San Diego. Almost all of the drinking water comes from the three water treatment plants that the city owns and operates. The treatment plants can produce up to 298 million gallons of drinking water per day all fed by local reservoir lakes.
Gas and electric utilities are provided by San Diego Gas & Electric, a division of Sempra Energy.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 156.29.64.65 (talk) 19:55, 4 February 2020 (UTC) 

Is there a single source on this? I've never heard this in my life. 59.124.5.22 (talk) 03:28, 24 March 2020 (UTC)

I've removed it as unsourced. OhNoitsJamie Talk 04:02, 24 March 2020 (UTC)

The title of primary image on this article is "Cementerio de San Diego de Quito, en Ecuador" - which means it's not a photo of San Diego, California. So it seems like it should be replaced with one from the right city. Valley17 (talk) 15:39, 1 August 2020 (UTC)

Please add to the Pre-Colonial History section: The Kumeyaay people were horticulturists, hunters, and gatherers, and inhabited the land for 10,000 years before settlers arrived in 1592. Now, the tribe is divided into 12 bands: Barona, Campo, Ewiiaapaayp, Inaja-Cosmit, Jamul, LaPosta, Manzanita, Mesa Grande, San Pasqual, Santa Ysabel, Sycuan and Viejas. The Kumeyaay now have 70,000 acres of land in East County, but more than 15,000 acres is unusable because of the removal of the El Capitan reservoir from Indian Government ownership. Kishabka (talk) 18:40, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for your request, but I would need a reference to add this. Can you suggest a Reliable Source? -- MelanieN (talk) 18:52, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

I have no clue if I am aloud to try and put this image in the article, or if it is good enough to. I figured I'd go ahead and try anyways. I'm also not sure if I need to do
any other formatting for it. Itsfluky (talk) 03:41, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

 Not done for now: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the {{edit semi-protected}} template.  The article already has a night photo of San Diego skyline.  It would be good to get consensus from other editors before replacing it.  RudolfRed (talk) 04:15, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

Could we please replace the older statistics, and information regularly, like, have a group that regularly every January/December, with up-to date statistics, as a regular thing, as well as updating the number of ships regularly, because that is actually pretty fluid, also please note that the Midway, is NOT an active Aircraft carrier, and is actually now is a museum, and has been for quite some time, please, lets make sure that only Active service naval ships are included, thank you, and I wish to express my respect for those who have more experience than my single day (at the posting of this) Kiri621x (talk) 19:21, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

Why is it not necessary to add a distinguishing link to distinguish San Diego from Santiago? 2A02:C7E:321A:1000:E4E4:569D:B3BF:8BA2 (talk) 14:46, 6 November 2021 (UTC)

They are entirely different names, there is little to no risk of confusion. Cristiano Tomás (talk) 18:45, 6 November 2021 (UTC)

Climate is missing from article. Pretty huge oversight. 2604:5500:50A5:7800:E9D7:39D8:FFD9:FF92 (talk) 10:30, 12 August 2022 (UTC)

There is a climate section San_Diego#Climate, which includes a link to a standalone article. OhNoitsJamie Talk 14:46, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
The Climate chart is a way off for the region. Please fix it!--2001:7D0:805D:7D80:81F7:790D:E7B8:EE07 (talk) 01:12, 25 October 2025 (UTC)

Fixed it by myself. 2001:7D0:805D:7D80:81F7:790D:E7B8:EE07 (talk) 01:22, 25 October 2025 (UTC)

The redirect Venturan has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 July 13 § Venturan until a consensus is reached.  —Lights and freedom (talk ~ contribs) 07:18, 13 July 2023 (UTC)

I'm going to do an audio recording for this article San Diego for the spoken Wikipedia just so you guys know.
Scrappy 19:28, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Note the American tuna fleet was driven out of San Diego (and the United States) by US government law/ regulation forbidding the incidental killing of dolphins while using nets to catch the tunafish.  So, all the fishing boats moved to Panama et/al. I lived in San Diego when this happened. 2600:8801:AD14:8A00:21B7:3B96:C625:BC08 (talk) 23:06, 30 April 2024 (UTC)

The redirect San Diego, United States has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 May 7 § San Diego, United States until a consensus is reached.  QuietHere (talk | contributions) 18:59, 7 May 2025 (UTC)

It has been a while since this article has been reviewed, so I took a look and noticed the following:

There are lots of uncited statements, including entire paragraphs.
At over 10,000 words, this article is too detailed and WP:TOOBIG. The prose should be spun out, summarised more effectively, and trimmed.
The "Demographics" section has the 2020 census in the graphs, but the prose still has the 2010 information. I suggest this be replaced with the 2020 statistics.
Should this article go to WP:GAR? Z1720 (talk) 02:52, 9 July 2025 (UTC)

Hello, everyone.
I noticed my hatnote letting readers know that San Diegan redirected to this article, San Diego, and that the named train could be found at San Diegan (train) was removed. I think that a user looking for the named train would look for the article "San Diegan", be redirected here, and subsequently have a hard time finding it. The disambiguation page San Diego (disambiguation) does have the named train on it, but I don't think a user looking for said train would go to the disambiguation page for "San Diego" - and the link is near the bottom of the page anyway.
@Magnolia677 told me they didn't see how someone could mistake "San Diegan" for "San Diego", and I think they're absolutely right - those two terms aren't similar enough for someone to confuse them. But they're also not similar enough for someone looking for the named train to click on the link to San Diego (disambiguation) in the hatnote and look for the train down there, in my opinion (because why would a train called the San Diegan be on the list of things called San Diego?). I know I didn't do that when it happened to me. Anyway, I was told this would be best discussed on the talk page, so here I am.
I think the hatnote makes it easier for readers to find what they're looking for and the above is my case for keeping it. Plutonical (Talk) 14:22, 21 October 2025 (UTC)

Nope, I wrote, "Not sure how a reader could confuse 'San Diegan (train)' with 'San Diego'." --Magnolia677 (talk) 15:05, 21 October 2025 (UTC)
@Magnolia677: I'm sorry for the misquote, but I agree - I don't think any readers are getting the two mixed up. My main issue is that a reader looking for the San Diegan (train) article may end up on this article through the San Diegan redirect - and that the current hatnote doesn't do a good enough job of informing them where they can find the article they're looking for (as I don't believe anyone looking for San Diegan (train) would click the link to San Diego (disambiguation) in the current hatnote, which is the only way to get from this article to the article about the named train without using the search bar. Plutonical (Talk) 13:00, 29 October 2025 (UTC)


### San Diego
Article (edit | visual edit | history) ·  Article talk (edit | history) ·  Watch • Watch article reassessment page • Most recent review
Result pending 
There are lots of uncited statements, including entire paragraphs. At just over 10,000 words, I think there is prose that can be trimmed or spun out into other articles. The "Demographics" section has the 2020 census in the graphs, but the prose still has the 2010 information. I suggest this be replaced with the 2020 statistics. Z1720 (talk) 16:16, 22 November 2025 (UTC)