# Talk:USS Concord (PG-3)

The Concord was assigned to the Public Health Service of the Department of the Treasury, NOT the US Coast Guard.  The vessel served as a hulk for the detention of passengers and crew for the purposes of quarantine. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.140.162.30 (talk • contribs) 23:31, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

I think this has been addressed. — Bellhalla (talk) 14:43, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:USS Concord (PG-3)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Below is my review of the article:

GA review (see here for criteria)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose):  b (MoS): 
1. Lead: I would personally keep the lead maximum of 3 paragraphs.
I shortened it to three. — Bellhalla (talk) 10:34, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
2. Discrepancy in date of laying down: Lead and text say it to be March 1888; the infobox says it is May 1888.
3. Discrepancy in date of launch: lead says, March 1890; the main text says March 1889.
The May 1888 and March 1890 dates were the correct ones; I've corrected the article. — Bellhalla (talk) 10:34, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 

It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars etc.: 

It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 

Overall:
Pass/Fail: 

Rest everything looks fine. There were a few 'on's missing before the dates. I inserted them. Thanks - DSachan (talk) 09:12, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for the review. — Bellhalla (talk) 10:34, 28 April 2009 (UTC)