# Talk:Tory Burch

It has been a while since this article has been reviewed, so I took a look and noticed the following:

Lots of information that was in the reviewed GAN is no longer in the article. I think the article no longer covers all major aspects of the topic.
The "Awards" section is formatted like a list, instead of in prose.
There is a paid COI banner at the top of the page: has this been resolved?
The lead does not cover all major aspects of the article.
Should this go to WP:GAR? Z1720 (talk) 03:38, 10 November 2025 (UTC)

I just noticed this. Although I wasn't involved in the creation of the article or bringing it to GA, I'll take a look at it. Softlavender (talk) 22:52, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
I have restored and whittled down the mass undiscussed deletion; removed the undiscussed tagging; fact-checked the board memberships; and reformatted some of the awards so they aren't all separate paragraphs.Here are some things to consider about the GA status:1. In 2015, the article creator removed the large section about her fashion brand/company and design style  [1] and made it into a separate article instead [2]. 2. There is now a large (possibly WP:UNDUE size-wise, considering the size of the article) Controversy section in the article.Therefore the article is substantially different from what it was when it was promoted to GA. If you think it merits GAR, then by all means go ahead. I'm not into doing GA stuff so I will probably bow out right now. Softlavender (talk) 06:51, 11 November 2025 (UTC)