# Talk:Thomas Ragon, Abbot of Vale Royal

This review is transcluded from Talk:Thomas Ragon, Abbot of Vale Royal/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Ultimograph5 (talk · contribs) 20:21, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
Starting review. Ultimograph5 (talk) 20:21, 18 February 2018 (UTC)

Well, I'm honoured you decided to make your bones on one of mine. It was certainly far sooner than I expected (cf., for example, October last year...), which is why I hadn't "polishied" it like I normally would a couple of weeks later—only having been written eight days previously! Anyway, @Ultimograph5: thanks for taking it on—a relatively simple one to start with, v. sensible—and have a look at the various changes, expansion, etc., that this edit brough to the article. Take care!  >SerialNumber54129...speculates 16:58, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

Peter, Abbot of Vale Royal    
1322–1339/40    
Article says 5th abbot?   

Robert de Cheyneston, Abbot of Vale Royal    
1340–1349    
6th or the 7th Abbot of Vale Royal?    

Thomas Ragon, Abbot of Vale Royal    
1351–1369    
Article says 8th abbot?   

I didn't notice anyone mentioned in the articles as having held an interim '49–'51 post.    

--99.32.150.12 (talk) 00:34, 30 January 2021 (UTC)