# Talk:Temptations (song)

Image:14. temptations.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 00:34, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Temptations (song)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Seabuckthorn (talk · contribs) 03:00, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Nominator: CrowzRSA
Hi! My review for this article will be here shortly.  --Seabuckthorn ♥ 03:00, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

Thank you so much!! CrowzRSA 03:20, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

1: Well-written

a. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors: 
b. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists: 

2: Verifiable with no original research

a. Has an appropriate reference section:  Yes
b. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:  excellent (Thorough check on Google. Cross-checked with FA – Reign in Blood)

c. No original research:   Done

3: Broad in its coverage

4: Neutral

5: Stable: No edit wars, etc:  Yes
6: Images  Done (NFC with a valid FUR) & (PD)

I'm glad to see your work here. As per the above checklist, there are no issues with the article and it’s a GA. 
Promoting the article to GA status.  --Seabuckthorn ♥ 02:38, 7 February 2014 (UTC)