# Talk:The Abbot's Fish House, Meare

This review is transcluded from Talk:The Abbot's Fish House, Meare/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Dr. Blofeld (talk · contribs) 12:53, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

Lede
"was constructed by the abbot between 1322 and 1335 " -do we have a name for the abbot?
Either Walter of Taunton or Adam of Sodbury from the dates but not sourced as far as I can find.— Rod talk 13:40, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
"Some restoration has been undertaken during the 20th century." -perhaps be more specific here.
Added a bit about the new roof in the 1920s.— Rod talk 13:52, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
History
Glastonbury Lake Village -no article? All capital letters seems strange.
Glastonbury Lake Village wikilinked. I'm not sure what you mean re all caps.— Rod talk 13:40, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
"The fish house is now in the care of English Heritage" -since when?
They took it over from the ministry of works when that ceased to exist in the 1980s - but state ownership/guardianship since 1911.— Rod talk 13:52, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
Further down you state 1884 for the fire, why not be more specific in the history too?
English Heritage says 1854, but a newspaper report published in Sept 1885 reports the fire (could be the annual meeting so could have been late 1884).— Rod talk 13:52, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
Architecture
Anything about the inner roof beams?
Nothing thast I've seen - but constructed in 1920s.— Rod talk 13:55, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality: 
B. MoS compliance: 
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources: 
B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary: 
C. No original research: 
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects: 
B. Focused: 
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias: 
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc: 
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales: 
B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions: 
Overall:
Pass or Fail: 
Good job.♦ Dr. Blofeld 14:50, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

The central arched door visible in the interior illustration of the text doesn't appear in the 1826 plan (illustration at right): a conjectural restoration made after the fire? Should the text reflect the discrepency?--Wetman (talk) 18:37, 8 February 2015 (UTC)