# Talk:The Demands of Liberal Education

{{Did you know nominations/The Demands of Liberal Education}} czar ⨹ 07:54, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:The Demands of Liberal Education/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: The Herald (talk · contribs) 15:35, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
You'll have the full review within a day. Thanks. -The Herald the joy of the LORDmy strength 15:35, 28 March 2015 (UTC)


### Criteria
### Review
Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors: 

B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists: 

Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. Has an appropriate reference section: 

B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary: 

C. No original research: 

Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects: 

B. Focused: 

Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias: 

Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc: 

Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content: 

B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions: 

Overall:
Pass or Fail: 


### Comments and discussion
...book by Meira Levinson that... could be changed to ...book by an American author Meira Levinson that... or the like. -The Herald the joy of the LORDmy strength 15:43, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
Some minor Dab Fixes required. -The Herald the joy of the LORDmy strength 15:43, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
The term citizenry could be better explained. -The Herald the joy of the LORDmy strength 15:43, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
The third para of summary section needs a bit more trims ti remove the repeated ..argues that... -The Herald the joy of the LORDmy strength 15:43, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
It would be good to leave a redlink of Meira Levinson anywhere in the article. -The Herald the joy of the LORDmy strength 15:47, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
Any info on the discussion of the book in American Philosophical Association's 2002 annual meeting will do, but good. I mean, you can say what they said and reviewed and commented and the like. -The Herald the joy of the LORDmy strength 15:53, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for the review so far. I believe the above have been addressed. I think declaring Levinson an author would be redundant, since she wrote the book, and I'm not sure it's relevant that she's American unless it's suggested for some reason in some style guide section. "Citizenry" is used in a straightforward manner as "subjects of the state", but if it still appears as jargon, I can put that phrase in a parenthetical. I don't believe Meira Levinson passes the general notability guideline or WP:SCHOLAR quite yet, so I didn't redlink her. I don't have details from the APA 2002 meeting past the published proceedings, though I elaborated a bit more from that document. czar ⨹ 09:33, 29 March 2015 (UTC)


### Result
 The article passed the GA review to fetch a GA status. All looks good and meets all the criterion for a GA. -The Herald the joy of the LORDmy strength 12:09, 29 March 2015 (UTC)


### Additional notes