# Talk:Taking Back Sunday (album)

There's absolutely nothing wrong about posting reviews from PASTE Magazine and Revolver Magazine. I do refer to the Wikipedia:WikiProject Albums/Review sites‎. They have guidelines, but the list of professional reviews there isn't finite as you're trying to imply. You're way uptight about regulating this album reviews, while you let other albums like Manchester's Orchestra Simple Math and Defetones' Diamond Eyes get a pass. I'm not adding unprofessional reviews, I'm adding reviews from two respected and reliable music magazines, so stop messing with the valid reviews I've been posting for the record. 
Also, I'm maintaining the KillYourStereo and CultureTease reviews. The first one, because the website is a reliable source for alternative music in Australia, getting to do reviews early on records. What happened with this record, since they were the second media outlet to actually review the record, almost one month early than all the others. Also because I don't think it's fair to consider SputnikMusic's staffers that admmit laughing about listening to the record for the first time after a leak acceptable, and at same deny the inclusion of websites that reviewed the record earlier because you don't know them. The same argument for CultureTease serves to maintain the KillYourStereo review, since CultureTease is featured among professional reviews on a lot of new records, example in case the latest Deftones and Manchester Orchestra's records. If they're reliable sources for people that have those albums on their watchlist, the same rule should be applied for the new Taking Back Sunday record. Altmusicreviews (talk) 04:43, 29 June 2011 (UTC)