# Talk:See You Again (Miley Cyrus song)

The showcased single cover is not the one that should be shown as the primary cover. That should be the cover from the Meet Miley Cyrus release. I can't find a concrete source where the MMC version is shown as the official single cover, but this reference credits the single cover to Hollywood Records, so I think it's official. If it's unofficial, there should be no primary single cover shown, and instead the Rock Mafia cover should be at the bottom of the infobox, as is the case with other alternate covers in articles. 
Aaronboy123 (talk) 03:24, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

Let’s see. First it was September 15, 2007 which is probably the correct date. Then all of a sudden it was December 29, 2007, then it was October 1, 2007, then it was August 21, 2008 and now it’s October 11, 2007. What date is correct? Thatsoddd (talk) 00:49, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

The truth is, this Destiny Hope Cyrus song "See You Again" is the opening track of Meet Miley Cyrus. Does that make sense? Esagurton (talk) 02:57, 10 April 2024 (UTC)

The alleged release date of See You Again as a single – December 27, 2007 – is so random and there's no source in the article confirming its release at that time. Furthermore, the article only has sources confirming the release of the Rock Mafia remix as a single in August 2008, but the Background section currently states this version was released as the second single for Breakout. There's currently nothing in the article indicating this song was released in 2007 as Miley Cyrus' debut single and the first single for Meet Miley Cyrus, so I don't understand why there are so many edits suggesting a single came out on that specific day. As far as I can remember, there hasn't been a source here for at least the last few years indicating this (which is especially surprising to me now I've come here to find out this article, which is considered good, doesn't even have something as simple as a release date confirmed). Danionek (talk) 19:30, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

Hello, the date is soursered from the rekord Label. They selebrated the anniebrsaryt,  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.223.217.181 (talk) 14:20, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
@87.223.217.181: Strangely enough, this alleged source isn't included in this article so that we can know whether it can actually be referred to as reliable. Danionek (talk) 15:26, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
There is multiple singles in wikipedia history. August 2007, September, Oktober, Desember, January, Marsh, April 2008, and August 2008. But the only soursed is desember by hollywood rekords instagram.

@87.223.217.181:I don't understand what you're trying to say in this message, but I know you're the same IP user who left messages in this thread earlier and also contacted me on my own talk page (to which I advised sticking to 1 talk page). To answer the question you asked me on my talk page: I don't know why no one posted this Disney Music Instagram post earlier, but anyone else could have if they wanted to use it as a source.However, I don't consider it reliable enough to confirm a single release. There's no other source confirming the release of this single than an Instagram post uploaded 17 years later, really? That post doesn't say much either, other than it supposedly happened in December 2007 (a more precise date would be much better), and there's absolutely no information about whether this was a radio single, a digital single, a CD single, or some other format. This falls far short of the standard sources for confirming a single release that we usually use on Wikipedia. What's most surprising is this song was listed as a single on Wikipedia long before Disney Music uploaded this post, and it's also strange there's no other source for such a well-known song and one already released in the digital era.Danionek (talk) 16:36, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
So it shouldnt be called a single ok the artivle?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.223.217.181 (talk) 21:22, 23 July 2025 (UTC) 

After multiple release dates from april 2007 to august 2008... finally. we got it.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.34.33.117 (talk) 14:38, 28 July 2025 (UTC) 

@83.34.33.117: Tagged this with Unreliable source? (any user can remove this date and reference entirely). A survey of songs from 1 radio company's website is something I wouldn't consider a reliable source. This website doesn't provide any information about which radio format the song had an impact on, what day it was released, or whether Miley Cyrus' record label was responsible. This last information is especially important because the labels are responsible and endorse the songs becoming official singles. Danionek (talk) 17:57, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
And what about th oth  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:9130:FD0C:9085:140F:19AA:E53:4136 (talk) 18:04, 28 July 2025 (UTC) 

So now the article uses a PDF of the December 2007 issue of Radio & Records. According to the Singles criteria, this magazine is considered reliable. (Though I'm personally not a big fan of it as a source here; the magazine used to have a Going For Adds section that directly reported singles to radio, but later issues, at least as of 2007, seem to no longer have such a section, and the mention of See You Again in this issue is only under Most Added in the CHR/Top 40 section. I tried looking at R&R, the new version of the magazine, which actively reported songs to radio in 2007 in its digital edition, but I couldn't find anything about See You Again in its archives.) Anyway, I never suggested the song wasn't a single at all, because if it was a hit and even appeared on airplay charts, it seems to me at the time it definitely had to have been sent to radio officially at some point. I know even articles about current songs use sources in the form of information about the singles' radio adds and that's supposedly enough, so for now I'll leave this article with Radio & Records as the best found source.Regarding this (which was posted on my talk page)—the CD release of the remixes of See You Again via Amazon—it could probably be used in the article! Its release date is May 20, 2008, which is over 5 months later than the radio release from Radio & Records. If that Radio & Records source isn't considered enough, then at least the CD release can be considered sufficient evidence the song was released as a single, at least in that form.Danionek (talk) 20:52, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
Single was released to us radio from august to december 2007.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.34.33.117 (talk) 20:23, 28 July 2025 (UTC)  i gree, the si gle was probably even eeleased begore decembwr but theres no source so well use that! Thank u
From July to December. 
Probably july but no so source  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.34.33.117 (talk) 21:54, 28 July 2025 (UTC) 

Can u check my mast edit?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.34.33.

Finally
117 (talk) 08:27, 29 July 2025 (UTC) 

Finally i added the cheonology.
Btw, and tbe final date.
Probably released in july but found no esrlier source. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.34.33.117 (talk) 

Your sources are not sufficient. You can't get release dates from Amazon's website, for instance. Binksternet (talk) 14:27, 29 July 2025 (UTC)
@Binksternet: What do you mean? When you visit a music release's page on Amazon, there's a See all formats and editions button that, when unrolled, lists the formats a given song was released in, along with their release date. In the case of the aforementioned CD release of the remixes of See You Again, that date is May 20, 2008 (I don't know if it's just me, but pressing that button doesn't currently unroll, perhaps due to a website glitch, but the date is still available if you search the page's code, and you can also see it in this archived version, where it can be conveniently unrolled and the date is displayed). When you wrote that we can't get release dates from Amazon's website, did you mean you didn't notice this date (because I admit I discovered it after many years myself, because it isn't visible immediately, especially now because of this glitch), or do you mean that such a date, i.e. May 20, 2008 here, is unreliable for some reason (because I saw something like this in articles about many other releases and it seemed to me that it could be considered reliable enough)? Danionek (talk) 18:17, 29 July 2025 (UTC)
@Danionek: Hi, looking for reliable references, I found the following 'sources' with the single release date:
Apple Music: June 26, 2007 (same as the parent album) [1]
Album of the Year website (similar to Metacritic, this website also collects music reviews): December 29, 2007 (close to the charts debut) [2]
Do you think if these references could be add into the article? Let me know. OscJ (talk) 02:54, 8 August 2025 (UTC)
@OscJ: Hi! The Apple Music source literally refers to the song being part of the album Meet Miley Cyrus (hence the same date), so it doesn't provide any confirmation of the song's release as a single. Regarding Album of the Year, the website is considered generally unreliable according to WP:ALBUMAVOID (although it doesn't say so there, I wouldn't be surprised if the website was simply considered user-generated, as there's a box for basic information about the song with a Submit Correction button, which redirects you to a page where you can supposedly make corrections. There, you can also see that a user changed the release date from September 15, 2007, to December 29, 2007, about 2 years ago, without any indication whether this was based on an actual source. And remember, this date was here when I created this thread, so maybe someone took it blindly from Wikipedia). For the reasons mentioned, unfortunately these sources aren't suitable for confirming a single release date. Danionek (talk) 18:08, 8 August 2025 (UTC)
https://books.google.es/books?id=LRMEAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA40&dq=see+you+again+miley+cyrus+billboard&hl=en&ei=wRzPTNv4AYO8lQfusomYBg&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=see%20you%20again%20miley%20cyrus%20billboard&f=false @danionek  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 37.134.194.229 (talk) 13:34, 14 October 2025 (UTC) 

@37.134.194.229: I don't know how accurate that can be. In the same issue, they also reviewed Katy Perry's Ur So Gay under singles reviews, and as you can see in the article about that song, it isn't considered a single, because it simply was never released in a form that deserved such treatment (at least as far as we know now, almost 18 years after the song's original release as part of an EP). Chris Brown's With You and Taylor Swift's Teardrops On My Guitar are also included there, though we consider them singles released a few weeks earlier. Thus, this could (or not) be further evidence See You Again is a single (which I've never denied), but maybe Billboard published that review late or something, since the song had already been on the radio for a few weeks, but I wouldn't consider the release date of this magazine's issue to be the same as the single's release, IDK. Danionek (talk) 13:32, 18 October 2025 (UTC)