# Talk:Washington State Route 168

This review is transcluded from Talk:Washington State Route 168/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: –CGTalk 20:22, 25 December 2010 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose):  b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): 
"Forrest Roads" in RD.
Fixed. --Admrboltz (talk) 00:23, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 
No reference for the final sentence of RD.
Doesn't really need one, look at any map to see any detour. --Admrboltz (talk) 00:23, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 

It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 

It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 
An image of the area would be nice, but not necessary for GAs.
Overall:
Pass/Fail: 
Just fix the two comments and its all good. Merry Christmas! –CGTalk 20:22, 25 December 2010 (UTC)
Looks all good. Pass. Merry Christmas! –CGTalk 06:52, 26 December 2010 (UTC)