# Talk:Sukhoi Su-37

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted.
Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia.
This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link.
If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting.
If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page.
If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request its removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta.
When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags.
The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true.
Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.
Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

http://www.airforce-technology.com/projects/su37/
Triggered by \bairforce-technology\.com\b on the local blacklist
http://www.airforce-technology.com/projects/su_30mk/
Triggered by \bairforce-technology\.com\b on the local blacklist
http://wayback.archive.org/web/20111021153332/http://www.airforce-technology.com/projects/su_30mka
Triggered by \bairforce-technology\.com\b on the local blacklist
If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.
From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 09:17, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
 Resolved This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag, if not already done.  No further action is necessary.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 19:50, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
 Resolved This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag.  No further action is necessary.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 22:45, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

In the article: But this was not true. The No.712 was never converted to the Su-37 specifications. This means, only 1 Su-37 was built.212.34.37.242 (talk) 17:45, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

The text you are quoting is not directly support by reference(s) in the article.  So it could be right, wrong or somewhere in between. -Fnlayson (talk) 14:48, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
Whatever. But it's not acceptable to have conflicting numbers in the lead and in the infobox. Why don't you write something like: "Whether one or two Su-35 planes were converted to Su-37 configuration is a matter of debate." and adjust the numbers to "1 or 2" or something along those lines? --BjKa (talk) 10:35, 8 September 2016 (UTC)