# Talk:Third Onondaga County courthouse

This review is transcluded from Talk:Third Onondaga County courthouse/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Unexpectedlydian (talk · contribs) 15:45, 14 January 2023 (UTC)

Hello! I'll be reviewing this article using the table below. I should get round to starting later today or tomorrow. Many thanks! Unexpectedlydian♯4talk‽ 15:45, 14 January 2023 (UTC)

Hi @Eddie891, thank you for all of your work on this article. It's very well-written and close to being good I think. I have a few minor comments in the table below. Do let me know if you have any questions. Thanks! Unexpectedlydian♯4talk‽ 22:30, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
Thanks, @Unexpectedlydian! I've just expanded the lede, so I think all your comments should be addressed. Eddie891  Talk Work  02:23, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Hi @Eddie891, looks great - thank you. Happy to promote this to GA now, well done! Unexpectedlydian♯4talk‽ 11:11, 15 January 2023 (UTC)

Nelson was influenced by a remodel of the nearby Rochester's Monroe County Courthouse, originally constructed in the Federal style in 1822 before being remodeled into a more modern style. -> need to revise, what is "Modern" in this context?
"Additionally, the library had grown so large that it cracked the walls of the annex." What is the annex here?
What is Ronao corp?
Eddie891  Talk Work  14:31, 22 November 2023 (UTC)

Here are a few comments I meant to post at the PR but never did.

Periods should be removed from some of the captions per WP:CAPFRAG.
Lead, para 3: Despite proposals to repurpose the building in various ways, including in the book Architecture Worth Saving in Onondaga County - I would say "including one in the book", because otherwise "including in the book" refers grammatically to "in various ways" (i.e. it sounds like one of the ways the building is being repurposed is in the book).
Description, para 1: A tower was attached to the left side - Which direction did the building face?
Description, para 2: 52 by 72 feet (16 by 22 m) - This should be singular.
I noticed that some quotations, e.g. "asymmetrical massing and detached form," have the comma/period inside the quotation marks even if they are not full sentences. Per MOS:LQ, for these types of quotes, the punctuation should be outside the quotation marks.
More in a bit. – Epicgenius (talk) 16:03, 11 January 2024 (UTC)

[1] Eddie891  Talk Work  12:49, 15 July 2025 (UTC)