# Talk:Revelations of Divine Love

My understanding, from a long ago graduate course in Chaucer, was that unlettered could mean simply "unable to read and write IN LATIN," that is, literate only in the vernacular. If a medievalist could confirm this, that section might be easily cleaned up.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.81.25.127 (talk) 04:02, 22 June 2010 (UTC) 
I have no expert credentials, but the same thought occurred to me. In any case, if it is suggested she may have been unable to read and write, how did she produce her work? Is it assumed therefore that she dictated all her writings? Orlando098 (talk) 11:24, 7 November 2010 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Revelations of Divine Love/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Usernameunique (talk · contribs) 19:05, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

Overall

Amitchell125, this is a really interesting article. I think it does a good job of describing the nuts and bolts of the work—its history, the extant copies, the publication history, etc.—but could use some work in describing 1) the actual contents of the work, and 2) it's reception (both past and present) and modern analysis. (It's possible that a section on analysis/appraisals might also cover some of the missing information about the content.) Given the strong start here and your excellent work on other articles, I'm sure this will come together nicely. --Usernameunique (talk) 19:05, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
@Usernameunique: Easy bits all done, more challenging last parts now on their way. Amitchell125 (talk) 20:10, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
@Usernameunique: I've completed addressing the point you raised, please let me know what else is required. Amitchell125 (talk) 21:42, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
Sorry for the delay with this, Amitchell125. This generally looks good. I've left some additional comments above; the main one is that the "Surviving manuscripts" section could use some tightening up. Once those comments are addressed I think this should be ready to pass. --Usernameunique (talk) 05:53, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
@Usernameunique: Issues addressed. Amitchell125 (talk) 17:54, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
Thanks, Amitchell125. A few responses above. --Usernameunique (talk) 06:08, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
Amitchell125, passing now. It's a very nicely done article. --Usernameunique (talk) 13:42, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
Usernameunique, many thanks for your help. Amitchell125 (talk) 15:23, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

Wondering if "shewings" might be a middle-English form of "showings." Just a thought, b/c if so we might wanna remark about that too. Augend (drop a line) 16:07, 13 May 2020 (UTC)

Amitchell125, the Armstrong book is published by Lulu.com which is a self publishing platform. WP also black lists it (I spotted it by using User:Headbomb/unreliable) – you may want to remove it or switch it out :) Aza24 (talk) 07:43, 5 December 2020 (UTC)

Aza24 - thanks for spotting it, now sorted. Amitchell125 (talk) 07:51, 5 December 2020 (UTC)