# Talk:Saegusa–Ito oxidation

This review is transcluded from Talk:Saegusa-Ito oxidation/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 21:24, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.
Disambiguations: none found.
Linkrot: none found. Jezhotwells (talk) 21:25, 1 March 2011 (UTC)


### Checking against GA criteria
GA review (see here for criteria)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose):  b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): 
The article is well enough written that I can follow it with my knowledge of Chemistry from an A-level over forty years ago.
It follows the Chemistry project guidelines and Manual of Style.
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 
References appear to be RS and check out. I assume good faith for those which I cannot access. Citations follow Wikipedia:SCG
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 
As far as I can determine, it is broad and focussed.
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 

It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 
I note that it is suggested on the file pages that .png images should be rendered as vector graphics, but that is not a GA requirement.
Overall:
Pass/Fail: 
I believe that this passes muster. I am happy to list it as a good article, congratulations! Jezhotwells (talk) 21:40, 1 March 2011 (UTC)