# Talk:Wild Woody

Image:1c 8.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 03:57, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

The article reads like a school report. Awful.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.255.78.155 (talk) 20:55, 14 June 2012 (UTC) 

I don't see how. It's basically how WP's structured like. GeraldWL 12:16, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Wild Woody/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Gerald Waldo Luis (talk · contribs) 13:00, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

A game that's destined to fail, as it seems. Reviewing this article. GeraldWL 13:00, 20 January 2021 (UTC)


#### Images and lead
File:Wild Woody Gameplay.jpg has some "NA"s. Please fill them.
Please add alt texts to assist those with screen readers.
"and it failed to make a commercial impact." I don't see any statements in Reception stating that it "failed to make a commercial impact."
It's in the last sentence of Reception's first paragraph: "Wild Woody failed to make a commercial impact, which Lanford attributed to its late release in the 16-bit era, questionable character design and standard platforming gameplay." Cat's Tuxedo (talk) 20:52, 20 January 2021 (UTC)


#### Gameplay
I remember a version of this article having a plot section. They are allowed to be included, so if you can, please do so. This should be placed below "Gameplay".
in which the player controls the titular character. Woody is an anthropomorphic pencil -- suggest changing to in which the player controls the titular character Woody, an anthropomorphic pencil.
Suggest linking totem pole as it is uncommon word.


#### Development and release
Suggest linking game engine within "engine".


#### Reception
Suggest paraphrasing some quotes to lessen copyright stuff. I see stuff that can be.
"Doug Lanford agreed that the title"-- "In response, Doug Lanford agreed that the title". GeraldWL 13:00, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

All done Cat's Tuxedo (talk) 20:52, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
Salute for that quick change. Now I just have two concerns on the plot. After this I'll give MOS:VG a last check.
"...the totem pole's power would be released; the totem pole segments scatter and create parallel universes for themselves, which threatens to destroy the world." Repetitive use of totem pole. Suggest changing the second mention to "it".
Suggest giving the sentences starting from "Under Low Man's instruction" a standalone paragraph. So the plot has two paragraphs. Much cleaner in my view. GeraldWL 02:17, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
And done. Cat's Tuxedo (talk) 03:25, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Cat's Tuxedo, and all good! I've added a portal bar; now it's GA. Hold on a second for that. GeraldWL 04:20, 21 January 2021 (UTC)