# Talk:Suga Mama

Even though the music sheet says that her vocal range spans up to D5, she actually hits a couple of G5s at 3:02 and 3:12 (the peak notes when she sings the last "Yes"). So I edited the vocal range but I didn't know how to reference the song itself. I mean, do we need a source when the notes are clearly hit at those points in the song?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.194.114.115 (talk) 03:27, 9 May 2016 (UTC) 

This song was not released as a single! It had a music video, but that does not make it a single!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.81.22.110 (talk) 01:26, 18 April 2008 (UTC) 

I think there is absolutely no need for an own article. It can be merged into the B'Day article.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Malcolmo (talk • contribs) 18:26, 28 September 2007 (UTC) 

Well, there seemed to be enough information about this single for an article independent of the main album page, so I re-created it from the redirect. If anyone knows of any other sources that could be used to expand it further, please add them. Extraordinary Machine 03:30, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

Does it have any physical release??? BritandBeyonce 09:53, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
Not that I know of. I think it was released on a strictly promotional basis, with, of course, the song available to download from places such as iTunes as an album track. Extraordinary Machine 20:29, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
I see. Hey! Is the cover a fan made only or official??? BritandBeyonce 07:54, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

The song "Suga Mama" was NOT a released officially as a single from B'Day. 
Like songs "Upgrade U" and "Freakum Dress", it recieved attention independent of the album, but it should not under any circumstances be referred to as a single. It is simply misleading.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.1.175.126 (talk) 21:32, 8 September 2008 (UTC) 

This review is transcluded from Talk:Suga Mama/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

This article is in decent shape, but it needs more work before it becomes a Good Article.
Is it well written?
A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct: 
Well done.
B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation: 
A little more should be added in the lead.
Check. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 14:22, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
Is it verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check?
A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline: 
According to this, there are two dead links.
Check. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 14:22, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose): 

C. It contains no original research: 

D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism: 

Is it broad in its coverage?
A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic: 

B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style): 

Is it neutral?
It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each: 

Is it stable?
It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute: 

Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content: 

B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions: 
It would be best if Image:Beyoncé Suga Mama music video.PNG was placed on the right, per here.
Check. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 14:22, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
Overall:
Pass or Fail: 
If the following statements can be answered, I will pass the article. Good luck with improving this article!
--  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 22:29, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

All done Gary King (talk) 03:21, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
Thank to Gary K. and Efe for getting the stuff I left at the talk page, because I have gone off and placed the article as GA. Congrats. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 14:22, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

Prince and The New Power Generation (The NPG) covered "Suga Mama" live at the 3121 Jazz Cuisine at The Rio In Las Vegas in February 2007.].
[1] 
Jivesh1205 (Talk) 07:34, 24 December 2011 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Suga Mama. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110718135601/http://uk.launch.yahoo.com/060907/33/20nfi.html to http://uk.launch.yahoo.com/060907/33/20nfi.html
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081209023209/http://allhiphop.com/stories/reviews/archive/2006/09/20/18134780.aspx to http://allhiphop.com/stories/reviews/archive/2006/09/20/18134780.aspx
Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/655SMVnSa?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mtv.com%2Fbands%2Fb%2Fbeyonce%2Fvideos_07%2Fnews_feature_040207%2Findex.jhtml to http://www.mtv.com/bands/b/beyonce/videos_07/news_feature_040207/index.jhtml
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110724121515/http://www.nuts.co.uk/video/search/all?term=Suga+mama+by+beyonce&x=0&y=0 to http://www.nuts.co.uk/video/search/all?term=Suga+mama+by+beyonce&x=0&y=0
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:12, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Suga Mama. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110604044908/http://stylusmagazine.com/reviews/beyonc/bday.htm to http://stylusmagazine.com/reviews/beyonc/bday.htm
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080313093234/http://media.www.blackvoicesonline.com/media/storage/paper1067/news/2006/10/06/Entertainment/Bday-2319563.shtml to http://media.www.blackvoicesonline.com/media/storage/paper1067/news/2006/10/06/Entertainment/Bday-2319563.shtml
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110713004712/http://uk.music.ign.com/articles/730/730624p1.html to http://uk.music.ign.com/articles/730/730624p1.html
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.mtv.com/bands/b/beyonce/videos_07/news_feature_040207/index.jhtml
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.nuts.co.uk/video/search/all?term=Suga%20mama%20by%20beyonce&x=0&y=0
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:16, 25 May 2017 (UTC)