# Talk:Shovel Knight: King of Cards

This review is transcluded from Talk:Shovel Knight: King of Cards/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Cukie Gherkin (talk · contribs) 04:58, 27 December 2023 (UTC)

Infobox

PS3 is mentioned in infobox, but not the article
I'll fix that
Plot

"who both seek a Joustus champion" Do they seek a champion of Joustus, or do they seek becoming a champion?
They both seek someone to appoint as a champion.
Reception

Edge, IGN, Nintendo Life, and Nintendo World Report should be incorporated in the reception.
I'm a bit confused about this. I don't have to use every review in reception, right? I only excluded Edge because I don't have access to the magazine review, and I don't see why I absolutely need to incorporate IGN.
@Cukie Gherkin, query on this. Thanks, The Night Watch (talk) 05:16, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
My mindset is that articles listed in the reception table should also be used in the article. Other editors do feel similarly (see this discussion. It's not something that has a strict policy or guideline position, mind. - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 05:19, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
Alright, I'll try to incorporate IGN, since NLife and NWT are already there. Gimme a sec. The Night Watch (talk) 05:24, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
Oh right, I forgot to remove the latter two (Nintendo Life I got confused by because it had a Game Developer URL attached to it instead of the NL review). That said, this is the only thing left before I can pass. - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 05:26, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
@Cukie Gherkin integrated IGN. Thank you! The Night Watch (talk) 05:33, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
Misc

Should archive the URLs
There was a bug with my PC when I was using IABOT earlier, I'll try archiving it again now.
Aight, passed. - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 05:35, 27 December 2023 (UTC)