# Talk:The Wrath of the Gods (1914 film)

This review is transcluded from Talk:The Wrath of the Gods (1914 film)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 19:36, 29 August 2014 (UTC)

Will leave some initial comments some point tomorrow. ☠ Jaguar ☠ 19:36, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
I'm changing the format of my reviews now (so it's less awkward):
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors: 

B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists: 

Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. Has an appropriate reference section: 

B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary: 

C. No original research: 

Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects: 

B. Focused: 

Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias: 

Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc: 

Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content: 

B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions: 

Overall:
Pass or Fail: 


### Initial comments
The lead is well-written and can see no problems here, so this meets the GA criteria
"Toya decides to convert and marry Tom at the local Japanese-American mission" - marry at the local Japanese-American mission? I don't quite understand?
The American mission in Japan.♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:25, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
"Ince had constructed a very large village in his studio Inceville" - where was his studio located?
"Four months prior to the release, New York Motion Picture Corporation put an ad"- advertisement?
"The film was released in a new theater called The Strand, on 7 June 1914" - was it premièred here? Where was The Strand located?
The film's DVD was released in the United States on 18 March 2008." - is there a reference for this?
All the references are fine and the citations are in the correct places so this meets the GA criteria.
@Dr. Blofeld: This is a generally well-written article, there are very few prose problems here so the review is somewhat short! The only minor  problems I found were a few confusing sentences that needs clarifying. I'll put this one on hold for the standard seven days. ☠ Jaguar ☠ 18:15, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
@Jaguar: OK now?♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:36, 30 August 2014 (UTC)


#### Close - promoted
Thanks for addressing those concerns so quickly! The article is well-written and referenced so in short it meets the GA criteria. I couldn't find any other problems with it despite the review feeling short. Just out of curiosity, is this film in the public domain now? I thought I have seen this one before but I'd like to watch it! Anyway well done on the extra work. Regards ☠ Jaguar ☠ 18:43, 30 August 2014 (UTC)