# Talk:Theatre Royal Drury Lane 8th September 1974

This review is transcluded from Talk:Theatre Royal Drury Lane 8th September 1974/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Willbb234 (talk · contribs) 19:14, 6 August 2019 (UTC)

Reviewing. Willbb234 (talk) 19:14, 6 August 2019 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, spelling, and grammar):  b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): 
Fails WP:MOS. Too many quotations in the 'Performance' sub-section. Makes the text hard to read.
@Willbb234: Good point; I've copyedited the section to reduce direct quotations of merely descriptive content (for instance, the article didn't need to quote exact language to convey that a song had a swing rhythm). I've retained some quotations that express a critical judgment that can't be paraphrased into Wikipedia's voice, but these are specifically attributed. It should be more readable now. —BLZ · talk 20:36, 6 August 2019 (UTC)
@Brandt Luke Zorn: Ok, thank you. Will review again tomorrow when I have time. Regards, Willbb234 (talk) 20:39, 6 August 2019 (UTC)
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):  d (copyvio and plagiarism): 
Plenty of reliable sources
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 
Covers all areas in depth
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 
Stable
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 
Fine
Overall:
Pass/Fail: 
Just the one problem, but should be easily fixed.

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, spelling, and grammar):  b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): 
Quotations reduced and appropriately replaced with suitable text.
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):  d (copyvio and plagiarism): 

It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 

It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 

It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 

Overall:
Pass/Fail: 
A well-rounded article well verified and well written.