# Talk:The Shipment (Star Trek: Enterprise)

This review is transcluded from Talk:The Shipment (Star Trek: Enterprise)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Ruby2010 (talk · contribs) 18:06, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
I shall review this one. Ruby 2010/2013 18:06, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

I was going to suggest you add wikilinks to Star Trek: Enterprise (season 3) in this and "Exile", but I see that the article is still a redirect. When an article eventually is created, you should add in the links to all S3 articles
I agree. It's certainly planned as Enterprise has the benefit of having (at least post-S1) reasonably good sources online. Miyagawa (talk) 09:09, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
"...which is producing a compound used in the construction of the Xindi weapon..." (should it be "a Xindi weapon" because you haven't yet established it in this article?)
Changed as suggested. Miyagawa (talk) 09:09, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
"The episode was filmed around Labor Day 2003 at the same time as the season premier was first aired" --> The episode was filmed near Labor Day 2003, when the season premiere first aired? (or perhaps simply state late August to early September rather than Labor Day?)
Changed to August/September as suggested. Miyagawa (talk) 09:09, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
"Two actors resumed their roles from earlier in the season, and John Cothran, Jr. had previously appeared as a Klingon in both Star Trek: The Next Generation and Deep Space Nine" -- could use a rewording (it's unclear if Cothran is one of these two actors). Perhaps add in a semicolon? --> Two actors resumed their roles from earlier in the season; John Cothran, Jr. had previously appeared as a Klingon in both Star Trek: The Next Generation and Deep Space Nine
Done. Miyagawa (talk) 09:09, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
"It received a 3.9/6 share among all adults and 6 percent of all adults watching television at the time of the broadcast" -- the second part is a bit incomplete (I assume it is trying to say "It received a 3.9/6 share among all adults, with 6 percent of all adults watching television at the time of the broadcast")
Yep, changed as suggested. Miyagawa (talk) 09:09, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
As with "Exile", it'd be nice if a few more reviews were added
Those are the only two that I've found which I would consider to be from reliable sources. I've checked the DVD reviews and they haven't said anything specific about this episode. Miyagawa (talk) 09:09, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
Overall nice work as usual. On hold for the standard 7 days. Thanks, Ruby 2010/2013 23:02, 22 June 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the review, let me know if there is anything else you'd like me to look at. Miyagawa (talk) 09:09, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
Here too, looks ready for GA status. Well done! Keep up the good work. Ruby 2010/2013 20:09, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on The Shipment (Star Trek: Enterprise). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.eonline.com/News/Items/0%2C1%2C12796%2C00.html?tnews
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160304062219/http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/17900/star-trek-enterprise-the-complete-3rd-season/ to http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/17900/star-trek-enterprise-the-complete-3rd-season/
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160330222620/http://www.startrek.com/article/enterprise-trekking-to-blu-ray-fans-helped-pick-covers to http://www.startrek.com/article/enterprise-trekking-to-blu-ray-fans-helped-pick-covers
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160303235110/http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/62392/star-trek-enterprise-complete-third-season/ to http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/62392/star-trek-enterprise-complete-third-season/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:15, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on The Shipment (Star Trek: Enterprise). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050914041931/http://trekweb.com/stories.php?aid=3fa138b3900bf to http://trekweb.com/stories.php?aid=3fa138b3900bf
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121108133709/http://trekweb.com/stories.php?aid=3fabbbd855fb1 to http://trekweb.com/stories.php?aid=3fabbbd855fb1
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:36, 19 June 2017 (UTC)