# Talk:Soviet frigate Rezvyy

This review is transcluded from Talk:Soviet frigate Rezvyy/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Zawed (talk · contribs) 09:42, 26 February 2022 (UTC)

I will do this one.
Lead

...the vessel was designed to operate as an anti-submarine vessel in the Soviet Navy...: vessel is used twice in this sentence, suggest something like "the vessel was designed to operate in an anti-submarine role for the Soviet Navy"
Good point. Amended.
with an armament : drop the "an", armament is used in plural form here.
Fixed.
After a major repair: repair implies an accident but there is nothing to this effect in the body of the article. Perhaps it an overhaul/refit?
It looks like a refit.
Design and Development

Probably isn't one, but may as well check: no link for "N. P. Sobolov"?
Not yet. That would be an interesting article to research.
link "dual-role URPK-5": this should be linked here as it is the first mention (it is linked later)
Moved wikilink.
Construction and career

Laid down by on 10 December 1973: looks like a missing word or words here "laid down by NAME?"
Oops.
Rezvyy, along with many of the class, : suggest "Rezvyy, along with many of the other ships of her class,"
Good suggestion. Reworded.
On this trip, Rezvyy, along with the Project 1134A (NATO reporting name 'Kresta II'-class): the Project 1134A/reporting name has already been mentioned in the design and development so it seems repetitive to recite both again.
Removed.
Rezvyy was sent to Shipyard No. 35 in Murmansk to be repaired.: as noted above, this seems to imply an accident of some kind so ideally should be explained. However, I wonder if it was actually a refit?
Looking at the source, it is likely a refit. I have clarified this in the text.
meant that the Soviet Navy was no more.: seems a little colloquial/informal for an encyclopedia, suggest "meant that the Soviet Navy ceased to exist.
Happy with the suggestion.
Rezvyy was transferred to the Russian Navy.: suggest "Rezvyy entered service with the Russian Navy."
And again.
Tromsø in the NATO member Norway.: suggest "Tromsø in Norway, a member country of NATO."
And again.
In general, the career information is a little light but if that is all there is...
Yes. The crew seems to have had a remarkably drama-free life.
Bibliography

The translated title for Apalkov should be title case like the other titles listed.
Done.
For Friedman, just checking "Russian Federation and Successor States 1991–" is the accurate title, the end year isn't missing from the date range?
Yes. That is the title.
Polmar is listed but not cited
I have re-added.
That's it for me. Zawed (talk) 09:42, 26 February 2022 (UTC)

@Simongraham:, just checking you have seen the above comments? Cheers, Zawed (talk) 10:17, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
@Zawed: Thank you for the nudge! Please see my edits and comments above. simongraham (talk) 13:30, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
This looks good, passing as GA now. Cheers, Zawed (talk) 07:27, 7 March 2022 (UTC)