# Talk:Soviet destroyer Sovershenny (1940)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Soviet destroyer Sovershenny (1940)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: CPA-5 (talk · contribs) 07:30, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
Claim my seat here. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 07:30, 15 September 2019 (UTC)

Sovershenny (Russian: Совершенный, lit. 'Absolute') Unlink Russian.
two bombs that virtually wrecked her; the Soviets subsequently Pipe Soviets with the Soviet Union.
overweight, displacing 1,727 metric tons (1,700 long tons) at standard load Link both tonnes.
expected would exceed the 37-knot (69 km/h; 43 mph) speed of Link knot.
Anti-aircraft defense was provided by a pair of Add "(AA)" after "Anti-aircraft".
Anti-aircraft defense/AA guns is overlinked.
as well as four 12.7-millimeter (0.50 in) DK or DShK machine guns Round the nought here.
on 25 September 1940 and was 90% complete --> "on 25 September 1940 and was 90 percent complete"
No need to spell it out.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 18:08, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
Why not?
They mean the same thing, so it's a pointless change, IMO--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 22:46, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
when the Germans invaded the Soviet Union on 22 June 1941 Pipe Germans with Nazi Germany.
lost power and took on 1,000 tonnes (980 long tons; 1,100 short tons) of water British tonnes and remove short tons.
rescue detachment of the Black Sea Fleet on 28 October 1945 Link Black Sea Fleet.
No edit war.
Infobox

"1,727 t (1,700 long tons) (standard)" Link both tonnes.
"54,000 shp (40,000 kW) (trials)" Link kW.
"4 × single 12.7 mm (0.50 in) DK or DShK machine guns" Round the nought.
Maybe mention her formor name in the infobox and the rename and laid down dates?
I think that that would just confuse casual readers.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 18:08, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
Sources

In the article the book "Where the Iron Crosses Grow: The Crimea 1941–44" mentioned it was made in 2013 but Google Books claims it was made in 2014. Which one is correct?
The latter.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 18:08, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
No OR
Standardise the ISBNs because I can see there are two kinds of usages.
What, 10- and 13-digits? The latter change wasn't made until 2007-08, so all the older ones have their published ISBNs.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 18:08, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
Okay I see.
Images

In the sentence of File:Батарея №111 Матюхина.JPG A 130 mm gun from Sovershenny used by a battery on Malakhov Kurgan Why are there no English units?
What do you mean? The measurement was converted in the previous section.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 18:08, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
I thought it was necessary to convert them again in images because the infobox and if there are tables then they are separate so why should images be included in the body? Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 21:42, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
No, the MOS only says infoboxes and in the text, either in the lead or the main body.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 22:46, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
That's anything from me. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 13:56, 18 September 2019 (UTC)

All done. Thanks for the review.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 18:08, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
I'll pass it. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 20:25, 20 September 2019 (UTC)