# Talk:The Girl Reporter

This review is transcluded from Talk:The Girl Reporter/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 21:00, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

Another GA sweep JAGUAR  21:00, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguations: No links found.
Linkrot: No linkrot found in this article.


### Checking against GA criteria
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar):  b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): 
I would recommend splitting the lead into two paragraphs to make the lead more balanced, per WP:LEAD
Nothing on the Production in the lead, despite the section being scarce the lead must summarise
"The film follows two sweethearts" - a bit informal? How about "lovers"
"The film was also shown by the Province Theatre of Vancouver, British Columbia in Canada" - better to shorten to Vancouver, Canada or British Columbia
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 

It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 

It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 

It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 

Overall:
Pass/Fail: 

Another part of the 1910 sweep done JAGUAR  15:06, 3 June 2015 (UTC)