# Talk:Rim Tim Tagi Dim

This review is transcluded from Talk:Rim Tim Tagi Dim/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: Nascar9919 (talk · contribs) 21:50, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: ImStevan (talk · contribs) 14:25, 21 June 2024 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
I think this article could receive good article status


### Writing
It is reasonably well written.

(prose, spelling, and grammar): 
(MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): 
At certain points in the article, the terms "grand final" and "final" are used a lot in succession
@ImStevan: Done? Let me know if this works for you. Cheers, mate! Nascar9919 (he/him • t • c) 14:50, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Thanks — IмSтevan talk 14:58, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
I'm not seeing any grammatical errors in this article, and the article follows a structure similar to that of related articles — IмSтevan talk 14:18, 22 June 2024 (UTC)


### Verified
It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.

(reference section): 
(inline citations to reliable sources): 
(OR): 
(copyvio and plagiarism): 


#### Eurovision Fun
Eurovision Fun is used as a source in multiple places (refs 36, 37, 38, 40 and 42), despite recommended caution for the site, change the sources if possible — IмSтevan talk 15:00, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
As much as I'd like to, they're the only site that publishes betting odds on a periodical basis. Wiwibloggs does it once in a blue moon, and no other site bothers to publish them. Will this still work? Cheers, mate! Nascar9919 (he/him • t • c) 15:04, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
I guess it's fine since they included screenshots of said odds. Perhaps adding an additional source such as EurovisionWorld through the Internet Archive would be benefitial  — IмSтevan talk 15:14, 21 June 2024 (UTC)


#### Copyvio
Passed Earwig with flying colors (10.7% match) — IмSтevan talk 15:00, 21 June 2024 (UTC)


#### Source spot-check
 Done — IмSтevan talk 14:47, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
Should clarify, chekced sources 15, 92, 16, 118, 74 — IмSтevan talk 09:27, 23 June 2024 (UTC)


### Broadness
It is broad in its coverage.

(major aspects): 
(focused): 
The article covers all aspects of the song and its influence, whilst not straying off the track — IмSтevan talk 09:19, 23 June 2024 (UTC)


### NPOV
It follows the neutral point of view policy.

Fair representation without bias: 


### Stability
It is stable.

No edit wars, etc.: 
No comments here, passes based on the article history — IмSтevan talk 15:03, 21 June 2024 (UTC)


### Images
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

(images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): 
(appropriate use with suitable captions): 


#### Cover
The cover is properly rationaled as non-free — IмSтevan talk 15:18, 21 June 2024 (UTC)


#### Illustrative images
Commons contains some images from the Eurovision pre-party tour that could be used in the promotion section. Other than that, the one picture used in the article is on commons and uploaded by the author, and has an appropriate caption — IмSтevan talk 15:18, 21 June 2024 (UTC)

@ImStevan: Added photo. Cheers, mate! Nascar9919 (he/him • t • c) 08:28, 22 June 2024 (UTC)


### Overall
Overall: 

Pass/Fail: 
Overall, the article is properly referenced, covers all aspects of the composition, is sufficiently long and illustrated properly. Looking forward to reading other articles from this contributor — IмSтevan talk 09:30, 23 June 2024 (UTC)