# Talk:Yugoslav destroyer Split

This article has been moved to include a disambiguation hull number. This move is unnecessary, as there is no other Yugoslav destroyer Split it can be confused with. R-11 also has no source in the article. It should be reverted to its original title. Peacemaker67  (send... over) 21:50, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Yugoslav destroyer Split/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Parsecboy (talk · contribs) 13:30, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

One dup link
Watch ENGVAR - I spy a "draught" in the infobox and a "harbour" in the body
Check the rounding for displacement - 3,000 long tons (3,048 t) would be better.
Since they were post-WNT ships, shouldn't LT still be the default for the La Fantasque class?
The French generally still used metric tonnages unless forced to do otherwise like WNT business.
The French wanted to be contrarian - who would've guessed?
Some of this is unclear. What exactly is France's role in the building of the ship (apart from supplying radios)? If she's being built in Yugoslavia by Yarrow, why would the invasion of France have any relevance? And why would the French protest a British embargo?
Fire-control systems and radios were French supplied.
You might add a line clarifying that Germany and Italy invaded Yugoslavia on 6 April - the city being captured by the Italians comes out of the blue for people who aren't familiar with the war.
it's referred to in the lede. Is that not enough?
Link NATO. Parsecboy (talk) 13:30, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
@Sturmvogel 66: - I think this got lost in the shuffle. Parsecboy (talk) 13:18, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
Nah, just be being consumed by game playing. See if my changes suit.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 01:10, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
Looks fine to me, great work as usual. Parsecboy (talk) 13:04, 1 February 2016 (UTC)