# Talk:Winter: Five Windows on the Season

This review is transcluded from Talk:Winter: Five Windows on the Season/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Khazar2 (talk · contribs) 20:59, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
I'll be glad to do this review. I'll do a close readthrough in the next day or two, noting any initial issues I see, and then start the criteria checklist. Thanks in advance for your work on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 20:59, 3 January 2013 (UTC)


### Initial readthrough
On first pass, this looks like strong, quality work. I don't anticipate many problems in this passing GA.

It would be helpful to add a half-sentence on what the Massey Lectures are, though of course it can be inferred.
"Gopnik claims" -- avoid if possible per WP:WTA. Perhaps "Gopnik later stated by the end of the 20-minute bus ride"?
I think it would be helpful to split the "Background" and "Content" sections into at least two paragraphs each, but this isn't a factor for this review, just a suggestion.
"from being portrayed as bleak and bitter or sweet and sublime" --should this be "to sweet and sublime"? Or does he argue that winter was formerly considered bleak and sweet by different people?
The block quotation is well chosen, very good touch there.
Since this appears close to ready, I'll begin the checklist now. -- Khazar2 (talk) 21:32, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for reading and providing comments. I have made all the suggested edits [1] maclean (talk) 06:32, 4 January 2013 (UTC)


### Checklist