# Talk:The King of Fighters '96

This review is transcluded from Talk:The King of Fighters '96/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: Tintor2 (talk · contribs) 23:46, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: TeenAngels1234 (talk · contribs) 21:44, 8 December 2024 (UTC)

Stay tuned.--TeenAngels1234 (talk) 21:44, 8 December 2024 (UTC)

"The game made a few changes to gameplay, such as the introduction of new techniques, and made various changes to the composition of some teams, with a few of them introducing new characters". Isn't too vague, with all these various, some etc?
Revised.
"and with which Iori is connected by sharing a similar fighting style due to his predecessor's curse". Can you explain it better?
Expanded
"Many people attended the word-of-mouth tests". Ditto.
Expanded
Too many "was", "were", et simila in Release and Related media. Try to rewrite all of them.
"only in Japan,." There's a superfluous comma.
Done.
@Tintor2: Nothing to say about Reception.--TeenAngels1234 (talk) 21:23, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
@TeenAngels1234: Tried revising everything. Thanks for the feedback.Tintor2 (talk) 21:40, 11 December 2024 (UTC)

Is it well written?
A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct: 

B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation: 

Is it verifiable with no original research?
A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline: 

B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines: 
C. It contains no original research: 

D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism: 

Is it broad in its coverage?
A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic: 
B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style): 

Is it neutral?
It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each: 
Is it stable?
It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute: 

Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content: 

B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions: 

Overall:
Pass or Fail: 
Good job.