# Talk:Vow (song)

Image:V vow.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 01:48, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Vow (Garbage song)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: AJona1992 (talk · contribs) 03:48, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

I'll review this article shortly. Best, Jonayo! Selena 4 ever 03:48, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
Comments from AJona1992
Infobox: "Released" needs a {{start date}} template
Infobox: "Length" needs a {{duration}} template
Tell me why does this sentence "Vow" is a 1994 song written, recorded and produced by alternative rock band Garbage and was released as their debut single in early 1995. is constructed like this? Please look at other GA song articles for a better approach.
Delink "Los Angeles and Seattle"
Delink Australia
Delink United States
Billboard needs to be in italics --> Billboard Hot 100
Delink greatest hits
"Vow" began in rough demo form in January, 1994 - not a great start, very weak prose
Delink Wisconsin
Delink Audition
Manson eventually returned to Smart - who is Smart? I know its Smart Studios but you add it here as if its a person
"for a successful second time" - why not just a say "for a second try" it borders WP:OR
Delink lyrics
Delink violence
Delink psychological
Lyrically, Manson claimed ""Vow" is about having feelings [of vengeance]. You have to face your feelings of revenge and work out why you feel that way. It's about that conundrum when you're really angry but in reality you're in a pitiful state. Angry, twisted, but deep down, vulnerable" - a period is missing (at the end)
Delink genre (music)
I'm going to stop here. This article was nominated prematurely, there are far far too many WP:COMMONWORDs that are linked throughout this article. Also, "Single release" for chart positions/peaks does not follow WP:ORDINAL at all, there are also many words linked twice (like their debut album). "Commercial track listings" does not follow simple WP:MoS. Moreover, File:GarbageVowvideo.JPG does not comply WP:NFCC its rational is very very weak and does not give a suitable reasoning on why a non-free video shot gives any educational value. I am most certain that File:GarbageVowInternational.png fails WP:NFCC and I also asked a more experienced user [1] about it. Also the "Reference" is a mess, publications are not italicized while one title is in capitalization, which is not supposed to be (even if the website presents itself as such). I suggest you fixed all concerns, get it copy edited, allow others to give it a WP:PR and then re-nominate. Best, Jonayo! Selena 4 ever 22:57, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
Also please look at this discussion about the second cover. Best, Jonayo! Selena 4 ever 17:17, 29 December 2011 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Vow (song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.garbage.net/garbage/articles/@dock.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 19:03, 31 March 2016 (UTC)