# Talk:SMS Prinz Eugen (1912)

I know that some guns of the Austrıan shıps where included ın the German Atlantıc wall as thıs shıp was gıven to france ıt ıs lıkly that thıs where guns of the Prınz Eugen. Flag and parts of the shıp where gıven to the German Prınz Eugen of the II WW. J —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.100.168.92 (talk • contribs)  05:54, 1 October 2006

This review is transcluded from Talk:SMS Prinz Eugen/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: ~NerdyScienceDude 22:11, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
I will be reviewing this article shortly. ~NerdyScienceDude 22:11, 12 September 2010 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose):  b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): 
Looks good.
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 
More citations in the "Construction" section would be nice.
Fixed. Added some Conway's and Sokol's.--White Shadows Your guess is as good as mine 23:21, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 
No problems here.
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 
Looks neutral to me.
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 
No edit wars detected.
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 
Images look good and illustrate the article.
Overall:
Pass/Fail: 
Looks good, but I have one comment pointed out above. I will pass it once the comment has been responded to. ~NerdyScienceDude 23:11, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
It looks good, so I'll pass it. Congratulations! ~NerdyScienceDude 23:31, 12 September 2010 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on SMS Prinz Eugen. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090805101618/http://www.hicon.pl:80/~pothkan/hhwn/AH-Maj.html to http://www.hicon.pl/~pothkan/hhwn/AH-Maj.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 01:47, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

It seems that no one has yet noticed that in this article ONE and the same picture is used for TWO different events and times:
"Prinz Eugen in 1914" and "Prinz Eugen underway on a rare departure from port on 28 June 1917" - SAME BOW WAVE!!! 80.151.9.187 (talk)  — Preceding undated comment added 10:57, 10 December 2020 (UTC)