# Talk:WASP-15b

This review is transcluded from Talk:WASP-15b/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 23:40, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.
Disambiguations: none found
Linkrot: none found. Jezhotwells (talk) 23:52, 16 June 2011 (UTC)


### Checking against GA criteria
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose):  b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): 
I made two minor copy-edits. Well written and complies with essential criteria of MoS
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 
Well referenced, RS, no evidence of OR
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 
Sufficient detail and focus
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 

It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 
License and caption fine
Overall:
Pass/Fail: 
This article meets the criteria, so I have no hesitation in passing it. Jezhotwells (talk) 23:52, 16 June 2011 (UTC)