# Talk:Russian monitor Edinorog

This review is transcluded from Talk:Russian monitor Edinorog/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Khanate General (talk · contribs) 17:15, 10 December 2013 (UTC)

Review will be posted in the next few days.--Khanate General ☪ talk project mongol conquests 17:15, 10 December 2013 (UTC)


### General
No disambiguation links.
Copyright tags for the pictures look fine.
No neutrality issues.
No missing in-line citations.
No original research.
Article is stable.
I've yet to detect any major spelling or grammatical errors.
When was the picture created? The date listed on File:Monitor Edinorog.jpg (1863-1957) is the date of the ship and not the picture.


### Description
Link the entire phrase "long overall" to Length overall, not just "overall".


### Career
Link to Baltic Fleet.
Is Engstrem gun worth a redlink?
Link Soviet to Soviet Navy or Soviet Union.
Briefly explain why the Soviets were forced to withdraw.
Excellent article, the only major issue is the date of the image. Good work.--Khanate General ☪ talk project mongol conquests 21:32, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
All done; the date of the picture has to be during or after the 1870s as she's been modified with the sponsons on the turret to mount the light guns, so it could possibly be as late as 1900 when she was decommissioned. Thanks for the review.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 21:44, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
Article passes as a GA. Good work.--Khanate General ☪ talk project mongol conquests 23:03, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

Edinorog is absent. Should be disambiguation? Compare ru:Единорог (значения)--Estopedist1 (talk) 06:40, 20 May 2020 (UTC)