# Talk:Poison Ivy: Cycle of Life and Death

This review is transcluded from Talk:Poison Ivy: Cycle of Life and Death/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Adamstom.97 (talk · contribs) 20:30, 20 October 2018 (UTC)

I'll take this one for review, plan to get back with some feedback shortly. - adamstom97 (talk) 20:30, 20 October 2018 (UTC)
Just a few things from me:

It would be nice if there was a little bit of an intro in the "Publication history" sections for those who don't no much about the character and don't want to go read her article. In particular, introducing that she is a plant-themed villain before you starting talking about the other plant stuff further down would be helpful I think.
I've added a short introduction to the character at the beginning of the "Production" section.
It isn't clear to me if the series was cancelled or if it was always intended to be just 6 issues.
I've changed the sentence about its initial announcement from "It was first announced in July 2015..." to "A six-issue miniseries starring the Batman villain was announced in July 2015..." Hopefully this makes it clear that it was always intended to be a six-issue miniseries.
Can you make sure that throughout the article you are only putting in-line citations after punctuation rather than in the middle of a sentence.
 Done
I think the reception section could do with a small copy-edit, just to paraphrase a bit more of those quotes.
I've paraphrased some of the quotes. Have a look and let me know if it's acceptable.
Can all of the web sources in the article be archived?
 Done
Get those sorted and I'll have another look. Let me know if you have any questions. - adamstom97 (talk) 22:22, 20 October 2018 (UTC)

@Adamstom.97: Wow thanks for reviewing two of my GA noms in such a short span! I've tried to address the issues you've raised. Do have a look, thanks. Bennv3771 (talk) 05:43, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
No worries, I have just felt in the mood lately to do some reviews and luckily so far they have mostly been in pretty good shape already. This one is no exception, I think it is a really good article. The changes you have made all look good to me, so I am happy to pass  this review now. Well done, and keep up the good work! - adamstom97 (talk) 09:51, 21 October 2018 (UTC)