# Talk:Oumare Tounkara

This review is transcluded from Talk:Oumare Tounkara/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Kosack (talk · contribs) 19:08, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

I'll take this one, will post review in the next day or so. Kosack (talk) 19:08, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
Initial review:


### Lead
Ligue 2 is fully professional, so I would change the opening to French professional footballer.
Link League One.


### Sunderland
Link friendly to Exhibition game.
Last sentence of first paragraph is unsourced.
"to complete an unlikely comeback"- what would be considered a likely comeback? Perhaps late would be more suitable?


### Stevenage
Unlink League One, already linked previously.
Link Conference Premier.


### Honours
Section is unsourced.


### Career statistics
In the table, you have combined totals of unrelated spells, for example Bristol Rovers, Stevenage and Grimsby are combined into a single total and also Drancy and Chateauroux are combined. Is there a reason for this? Normally stats tables have total rows for more than one season at a single club.


### References
Refs 3 and 14 from the Sunderland website are dead links, any chance of recovering them?
Refs 25, 30, 31 and 32 from The Post are also gone.
Refs 36 and 37 need an author.
Not too much really, a highly polished article with a handful of minor quibbles. Kosack (talk) 14:12, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for reviewing the article, Kosack. Have made all of the above changes. You're quite right about the career statistics table so that's been changed too. Let me know if there's anything else. Cheers. SBFCEdit (talk) 14:42, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
@SBFCEdit: Nice work, one further thing, ref 16 appears to have gone dead as well. Once that's sorted, I think this one is ready for promotion. Kosack (talk) 19:06, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
@Kosack: All sorted now. Cheers. SBFCEdit (talk) 19:46, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
Happy to promote this, meets the necessary GA criteria. Kosack (talk) 19:56, 1 July 2018 (UTC)