# Talk:The Restoration (1910 film)

This review is transcluded from Talk:The Restoration (1910 film)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 19:18, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

Don't worry, we'll get through these JAGUAR  19:18, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguations: No links found.
Linkrot: No linkrot found in this article.


### Checking against GA criteria
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar):  b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): 
I would recommend splitting the lead into two paragraphs to make the lead more balanced, per WP:LEAD
"Little is known of the production credits, but the film does feature Marie Eline as the little girl" - could be re-worded so Marie Eline is mentioned first
Nothing on production in the lead?
"The writer of the scenario is unknown, but it was most likely Lloyd Lonergan" - this needs a citation
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 

It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 

It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 

It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 

Overall:
Pass/Fail: 

The reception section is very well detailed, so this one should come to a pass like the rest. Well done JAGUAR  20:55, 2 June 2015 (UTC)