# Talk:Twilight (2008 film)

just letting you know that the caption for the picture under "Awards & Nominations" says "MTV Music Awards" instead of "MTV Movie Awards"
220.253.63.205 (talk) 01:16, 17 December 2009 (UTC)

 Fixed ~ ς ح д r خ є ~ 02:16, 17 December 2009 (UTC)

im not sure what won what yet, but if i could find out, could someone help me enter the awards into the article? im not quite sure how to use the table yet. --WhereTheLinesOverlapXX (talk) 12:39, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

See the related help page ~ ς ح д r خ є ~ 13:10, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

{{editsemiprotected}}
I think you should add the dvd sales of  $186,347,713 to the  $384,997,808 what it grossed at the box office plus add the budget of $37,000,000. this would bring the grossing to $608,341,521. Please could you do this as i think pepole should see how poplaur it was thanks.
ThePidge001 (talk) 17:58, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
 Not done: Welcome and thanks. Three problem: 1) Please provide a reliable source for the values you are listing; 2) You need to detail the change like "please change '...grossed 384,997,808 at the box office' to '... grossed $571,345.521 in box office and dvd sales'"; and 3) Adding the gross revenues to the cost doesn't produce a meaningful value, normally one removes the cost from the gross to determine the net. Thanks, Celestra (talk) 18:29, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

{{editsemiprotected}}
hi ive done a request already please could you consider this request as u should put at leasr dvd sales with films. thanks it would show both films have done really well.
ThePidge001 (talk) 19:08, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
 Not done: Hi. The numbers for the DVD sales are already included in the article. I looked at where those numbers and the box office numbers come from and they don't include the DVD sales in the "gross" for the movie. If you were asking to change the "Gross revenue" in the infobox, we need to leave it as it is to compare fairly with other movies. Sorry, Celestra (talk) 19:28, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

This article is one of a  number selected for the early stage of the trial of the Wikipedia:Pending Changes system on the English language Wikipedia. All the articles listed at Wikipedia:Pending changes/Queue   are being considered for level 1 pending changes protection.
The following request appears on that page:

Comments on the suitability of theis page for "Pending changes"  would be appreciated.
Please update the Queue page as appropriate.
Note that I am not involved in this project any much more than any other editor, just posting these notes since it is quite a big change, potentially
Regards, Rich Farmbrough, 00:27, 17 June 2010 (UTC).

{{editsemiprotected}}

Twilight Romantic Movie Stills
Ak4chat (talk) 17:43, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

 Not done: please be more specific about what needs to be changed.   Salvio  Let's talk 'bout it! 18:19, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
Good luck 41.114.145.16 (talk) 15:10, 23 December 2024 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Twilight (2008 film)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: White Shadows It's a wonderful life 16:42, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
I'll be reviewing this for a GA as soon as I can. I said that I'll review another one too so I'll try to get them both done at the same time ;)--White Shadows It's a wonderful life 16:42, 2 August 2010 (UTC)


### Criteria
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose):  b (MoS): 
Prose is fairly good and concise but I'd suggest a minor copy-edit just to make sure that there are not any issues that I may have missed. Once you get a copy-edit, the prose and MOS are good to go.--White Shadows Nobody said it was easy 21:08, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
I took a pass at copy-editing.  What do you think? Cliff smith talk 02:20, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
Looks good. I'll consider this part done :)--White Shadows Nobody said it was easy 02:35, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 
"It is rated 12A in the United Kingdom and Ireland." needs a source. Other than that, I see nothing else wrong.--White Shadows Nobody said it was easy 21:08, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
Done. ChaosMasterChat 02:54, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 
No change needed here :)--White Shadows Nobody said it was easy 21:08, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
a (fair representation):  b (all significant views): 
No change needed here.--White Shadows Nobody said it was easy 21:08, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
It is stable.
No edit wars etc.: 
The article is stable now that semi-protection has been put into place. No action required.--White Shadows It's a wonderful life 17:10, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
a (tagged and captioned):  b (Is illustrated with appropriate images):  c (non-free images have fair use rationales):  d public domain pictures appropriately demonstrate why they are public domain': 
All images are ok.--White Shadows Nobody said it was easy 21:14, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
Overall:
a Pass/Fail: 
Passed'--White Shadows Nobody said it was easy 02:58, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
I have an issue with the images. The one of Edward and Bella just shows them in a meadow. Is a non-free image needed to depict people laying in a meadow? The other image is claimed to be someone's own work but the image is published on several other websites before the user uploaded it to wikipedia. No offense to the uploader but I found the image here here here here plus a few others. --Peppagetlk 18:11, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
You make a point. Chaos, can you just remove them so this GA can keep on rolling?--White Shadows Nobody said it was easy 23:39, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
I don't think the first image (the meadow) is a problem. The second, though, I can easlily just put correct "tags" on them. What should I use though? I'll fix them so there can be no further issues. ChaosMasterChat 01:07, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
I've removed that last image to pass this GAN. Good job! I'd suggest that you keep that image off of the article until you can confirm that it is in the PD ;)--White Shadows Nobody said it was easy 02:58, 13 August 2010 (UTC)

105.239.91.124 (talk) 15:22, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

 Not done as you have not requested a change. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. --I am k6ka Talk to me! See what I have done 15:59, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Twilight (2008 film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20081216085844/http://www.sfgate.com:80/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2008/04/15/entertainment/e113257D92.DTL to http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2008/04/15/entertainment/e113257D92.DTL
Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090220110140/http://www.calendarlive.com:80/movies/reviews/cl-et-twilight21-2008nov21,0,2377824.story to http://www.calendarlive.com/movies/reviews/cl-et-twilight21-2008nov21,0,2377824.story
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 08:40, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Twilight (2008 film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20081216085235/http://www.hollywoodreporter.com:80/hr/content_display/film/news/e3i149edf3e04ae01688f7c6eaf5e1bde85?pn=1 to http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/film/news/e3i149edf3e04ae01688f7c6eaf5e1bde85?pn=1
Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20081216085036/http://www.variety.com:80/article/VR1130001163.html to http://www.variety.com/article/VR1130001163.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 17:16, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Twilight (2008 film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090425173548/http://www.creators.com/lifestylefeatures/hollywood-exclusive/tyson-beckford-enjoying-men-s-supermodel-success-reno-911-s-lennon-delivers-the-state-of-the-state.html to http://www.creators.com/lifestylefeatures/hollywood-exclusive/tyson-beckford-enjoying-men-s-supermodel-success-reno-911-s-lennon-delivers-the-state-of-the-state.html
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080305064900/http://www.hollywood.com/moviedetail/Twilight/3462420 to http://www.hollywood.com/moviedetail/Twilight/3462420
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=%2Fn%2Fa%2F2008%2F04%2F15%2Fentertainment%2Fe113257D92.DTL
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110719205923/http://www.youngartistawards.org/noms30.html to http://www.youngartistawards.org/noms30.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:16, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Twilight (2008 film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090421105810/http://www.bravotv.com/bravo-a-list-awards/2009-nominees to http://www.bravotv.com/bravo-a-list-awards/2009-nominees
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:29, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

Please add a statement below the title to link to the disambiguation page.
For other uses, see Twilight (disambiguation). Link is here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twilight_(disambiguation) Walerts (talk) 14:25, 10 March 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: per WP:NAMB. NiciVampireHeart 00:00, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

I personally disagree with how the cast list is organized. I don't think it's accurate to describe the two leads (Stewart and Pattinson) as the only "Main" cast, describing everyone else as "Secondary". List of The Twilight Saga cast members includes several additional cast members as playing "Principal" characters, which makes more sense. I suggest that we restore the organization of the cast based on Cullens and Swans as seen here. That format was changed to its current format by someone who hasn't edited in nine years, and whose only edits are related to Twilight films. I suspect this person was a Pattinson fan, which could account for singling out Pattinson and Stewart, while relegating everyone else to "secondary". Sundayclose (talk) 22:20, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

I agree 100%. This isn't done for other films.  Why is it allowed here?  There is just a cast, not a main cast.  Anyone other than the "main" cast would be uncredited actors. This really should be fixed.  73.6.96.168 (talk) 20:06, 6 November 2021 (UTC)

I think I died of boredom 2601:2C7:4581:85E0:F858:4D19:E0F6:879D (talk) 00:36, 9 January 2022 (UTC)

New user here - The “plot” states that James becomes excited by Bella’s scent and becomes obsessed with hunting Bella for sport. It is true that James enjoys Bella’s scent, however, Edward states that James’ obsession is the hunt itself, not necessarily Bella. It is because of Edward’s attempt to protect Bella that sets James off and initiates the hunt. Edward realizes this by reading James’ mind and states, “I just made this his most exciting game ever.” Secondly, the “cast” section states that Jessica Stanley, played by Anna Kendrick, is Bella’ first friend in Forks. This is debatable considering Eric Yorkie, played by Justin Chon, was the first one to reach out to Bella and bring her to the lunch table where Jessica and the rest of her soon-to-be friends are sitting. ShaylaTrimmer (talk) 19:46, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians! This is my very first post on here. I noticed that under external links there is not a reference as to where to find the information regarding release dates, bonus features, deleted scenes, and Twilight's total earnings, which are found in the Home Media section. Another reliable link with this kind of information can be found at:
https://www.the-numbers.com/movie/Twilight-(2008)#tab=summary 
BloomieGirl20 (talk) 20:35, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

I think you guys should make a sequel of the movie or even turn it into a TV show I don’t care which one but I think you should bring it back in the main king characters should be Renessams 207.255.8.223 (talk) 20:56, 13 November 2022 (UTC)

"Hardwicke" is incorrectly written as "Hardwick" at least once in the page. I would ammend this. Lilyc333 (talk) 05:12, 7 January 2024 (UTC)

 Done The Herald (Benison) (talk) 17:15, 7 January 2024 (UTC)

ich möchte hier mit bescheid sagen das ein kund schon seit 3 Monate auf seine Bestellung warte 2003:D2:AF07:3113:A091:7F7:915A:51D9 (talk) 16:38, 8 July 2024 (UTC)