# Talk:Ontario Highway 59

To improve this article, here are some guidelines for the B class criteria for road articles. SriMesh | talk 03:33, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Ontario Highway 59/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Seabuckthorn (talk · contribs) 05:15, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
Nominator: Floydian τ ¢
Hi! I'll be reviewing this article for GA status, and should have my full review up shortly. --Seabuckthorn ♥ 05:15, 6 January 2014 (UTC)

1: Well-written

a. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors: .
b. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists: 

Check for WP:WTW:  None 
Check for WP:EMBED:   Done

The table is standard in such articles. Checked other FAs - Ontario Highway 401 & Ontario Highway 416

2: Verifiable with no original research

a. Has an appropriate reference section:  Yes
b. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:  very good Checked other FAs - Ontario Highway 401 & Ontario Highway 416

c. No original research:   Done

3: Broad in its coverage

4: Neutral

5: Stable: No edit wars, etc:  Yes
6: Images   Done (Cross-checked with other FAs - Ontario Highway 401 & Ontario Highway 416.) 

As per the above checklist, the issues identified with the lead are:

Route description in the lead "It connected ... en route." is very short and is not an accurate summary of the content in the body.
There is a mismatch in due weight given to the Route description in the lead and the body.
The lead is too short in comparison to the content in the body and should be expanded.
This article is a very promising GA nominee. I'm delighted to see your work here. I'm putting the article on hold. All the best! --Seabuckthorn ♥ 22:40, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

I've added a bunch of info to the RD portion of the lede, and removed duplicate links as necessary. There isn't much to add to the lede regarding the history, but I stuck in a small blurb noting that the length tripled as a result of the changes in 1961. Let me know if you can see anything else that might be worth squeezing in. Once again, thanks for the reviews :) Cheers, Floydian τ ¢ 05:19, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
OK. It's looking really good now. Passing the article to GA status. Congratulations! --Seabuckthorn ♥ 10:14, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

Cyberbot II has detected links on Ontario Highway 59 which have been added to the blacklist, either globally or locally. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed or are highly inappropriate for Wikipedia. The addition will be logged at one of these locations: local or global
If you believe the specific link should be exempt from the blacklist, you may request that it is white-listed. Alternatively, you may request that the link is removed from or altered on the blacklist locally or globally.
When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags.
Please do not remove the tag until the issue is resolved. You may set the invisible parameter to "true" whilst requests to white-list are being processed. Should you require any help with this process, please ask at the help desk.
Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

http://g.co/maps/prcpf
Triggered by (?<!-)\bg\.co\b on the global blacklist
If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.
From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 08:05, 7 September 2014 (UTC)