# Talk:Quantum electrodynamics

So that's what it is then, and that explains both the preponderance of non-technical lay interest in the subject and the lack of technical merit to any public discussions on it to be found. It's a hats-off-for-the-ladies-please-gentlemen spiel or high pressure sales pitch for theoretical physics in general, likening wishy-washy theories of particle physics to hard mathematical proofs with plenty of "true believers" planted in the audience to attack any hecklers or doubters. High energy physics takes a lot of money to research, first and foremost. Particle accelerators aren't cheap, and the physicists need taxes and government grant monies to keep the lights on at CERN and similar facilities.
The interests of intelligence and healthy skepticism rather than theoretical phsyics as nothing but barroom world records for the general public lead us to believe that if there's too much easy grant money on the table for particle physics, then fraudsters have easy access to nukes, and otherwise there is too much top secret government hush-hush which is just as bad.
We're facing a "labor nuke" from Europe. 
Introduction to the constants for nonexperts
It's definitely a spiel when they tell us how stupid we are. Justina Colmena ~biz (talk) 16:48, 12 February 2025 (UTC)