# Talk:Subtropical Storm Nicole

Just so you know, you can't assess your own articles. It needs inline sourcing, a good copyedit, a split records and impact section, and info from NHC and CHC discussions. Hurricanehink (talk) 20:52, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

The first sentence bothers me, but I don't know how to modify it in a way that would to easily understandable to the layman.  Are you trying to say Nicole was the first system to be called a subtropical cyclone operationally and be named from the traditional Atlantic name set?  There have been several systems named that were subtropical initially, even in NHC discussions from the time, but not been called subtropical in the main header of their products and were given a name from the usual name list (More memorable examples from my viewpoint:  Hortense through Lili (1984), Juan (1985), Andrew (1986), Charley (1986)). Thegreatdr 20:58, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
I think he's saying a named subtropical storm that never became tropical. Hurricanehink (talk) 21:06, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
Ah, more like Juan (1985) then.  That system looked awful in the Gulf of Mexico surrounded to the north by air temperatures in the 50s and 60s and a large stratus shield that reached the Great Lakes while Juan was still centered in the Gulf of Mexico.  The change has been made.  Thegreatdr 21:09, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
Nice job. Yea, Juan was hardly a typical tropical cyclone. Hurricanehink (talk) 21:35, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

No way this is a start. It has very little info to stand on its own. – Chacor 11:01, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

Why isn't this article a start?  It seems to have organized information which is referenced.  What more does it need?  It doesn't appear much more can be added to it.  Thegreatdr 02:49, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
This was a stub-class, but it's since been worked on. Upped. – Chacor 03:00, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
Is it B class yet? If not, what more is needed? Hurricanehink (talk) 03:06, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
Probably is good enough to qualify for B-. No major errors I can find. – Chacor 03:28, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
In that case, I put it up for GA. Hurricanehink (talk) 03:40, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

This article will be put on hold (for 7 days) until these minor adjustments can be made :

1. Well written? Pass
2. Factually accurate? OK Pass
3. Broad in coverage? Pass
4. Neutral point of view? Pass
5. Article stability? Pass
6. Images? Pass

Additional comments :

How can a low formed in August cause a tropical storm in October?
Lincher 13:05, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

Wow, I'm sorry about that. I was working on another article (a season article) as I was writing this, and I guess it slipped my mind. That was the only month mistake in the article, and I fixed it. Hurricanehink (talk) 15:19, 16 October 2006 (UTC)


### GA passed
Thanks for that fix. Lincher 02:54, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

As part of the WikiProject Good Articles, we're doing sweeps to go over all of the current GAs and see if they still meet the GA criteria. I'm specifically going over all of the "Meteorology and atmospheric sciences" articles. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. I have made several minor corrections throughout the article. Altogether the article is well-written and is still in great shape after its passing in 2006. Continue to improve the article making sure all new information is properly sourced and neutral. It would also be beneficial to go through the article and update all of the access dates of the inline citations and fix any dead links. If you have any questions, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. I have updated the article history to reflect this review. Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 20:50, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Subtropical Storm Nicole (2004). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110718122223/http://www.weather.bm/data/2004-10.html to http://www.weather.bm/data/2004-10.html
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060501083606/http://www.atl.ec.gc.ca/weather/hurricane/storm04.html to http://www.atl.ec.gc.ca/weather/hurricane/storm04.html
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050830210452/http://www.bea.doc.gov/bea/dn/hurricane.htm to http://www.bea.doc.gov/bea/dn/hurricane.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:21, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Subtropical Storm Alpha (1972) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RMCD bot 07:31, 17 October 2018 (UTC)