# Talk:Émilienne Morin

This review is transcluded from Talk:Émilienne Morin/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: Grnrchst (talk · contribs) 15:54, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
Reviewer: Borsoka (talk · contribs) 10:42, 5 August 2025 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it well written?
A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct: 

B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation: 

Is it verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check?
A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline: 

B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose): 

C. It contains no original research: 

D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism: 

Is it broad in its coverage?
A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic: 

B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style): 

Is it neutral?
It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each: 

Is it stable?
It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute: 

Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content: 

B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions: 

Overall:
Pass or Fail: 

Image review

File:Émilienne Morin - Buenaventura Durruti (1936).jpg: US PD tag is missing at Commons. Borsoka (talk) 10:42, 5 August 2025 (UTC)
Removed until I can find more information about the photo's author/publication. --Grnrchst (talk) 12:13, 5 August 2025 (UTC)
Source review

Academic works of high quality are cited.
The place of publication is listed only for Paz. Delete it. Borsoka (talk) 10:42, 5 August 2025 (UTC)
Removed. --Grnrchst (talk) 12:10, 5 August 2025 (UTC)
References 2a-c, 29, 32, 34 are OK.
The suppression of the coup led to an amnesty for anarchist political prisoners. The sentence is not verified by the cited source. Borsoka (talk) 12:43, 6 August 2025 (UTC)
Added citation. --Grnrchst (talk) 07:59, 7 August 2025 (UTC)
Commnets

..., which amused the couple Rephrase.
Decided to trim this. --Grnrchst (talk) 12:10, 5 August 2025 (UTC)
There she was interviewed by Hans Magnus Enzensberger... He is mentioned in a previous sentence.
Trimmed first instance. --Grnrchst (talk) 12:10, 5 August 2025 (UTC)
Ascaso is linked multiple times.
Cut over-linking. --Grnrchst (talk) 12:10, 5 August 2025 (UTC)
Do we have information about her life during WWII? Borsoka (talk) 10:59, 5 August 2025 (UTC)
Nothing as far as I'm aware. I've double-checked the sources, but couldn't find anything about WWII. French sources go out of their way mention if someone was in the Resistance, so I think it's safe to say Morin wasn't involved (she did have a young child to take care of after all). --Grnrchst (talk) 12:10, 5 August 2025 (UTC)
@Borsoka: Hey, is there anything more that I need to do? --Grnrchst (talk) 11:01, 11 August 2025 (UTC)
No. I passed it. Thank you for this interesting article. Borsoka (talk) 12:18, 11 August 2025 (UTC)
Thanks for reviewing it! --Grnrchst (talk) 12:23, 11 August 2025 (UTC)