# Talk:Virtual Theatre

This review is transcluded from Talk:Virtual Theatre/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Czarkoff (talk · contribs) 10:31, 1 April 2012 (UTC)


### Discussion
Hi! I merged the "Games" section into Development, in this style: "Lure of the Temptress, released in 1992 for Amiga, Atari ST and PC..." etc. I have split the "Development" section into "Development" and "Features." :) --Khanassassin ☪ 12:14, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

Let me handle the table, please. I'll do the proper prose and MOS checks once the split is complete and no duplicate statements would be found in the sections. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 16:49, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
Oh, ok. Just one thing, do You really think the miage in the infobox should be so small? Just saying... :) --Khanassassin ☪ 17:34, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
IMHO pixelization is a problem much more severe then that of size. This image is too low quality (I mean the technical aspect) to be upscaled. – Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 11:32, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
I think I've removed all the duplicate sentences... but, You said You'll handle the table, so You'll judge if I'm done or not... :) --Khanassassin ☪ 17:41, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
OK to me. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 11:32, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
What "solid" means, is that..well..it's solid. So, because it's solid, unlike in most adventure games (where objects were transparent), the player character couldn't walk straight through the non-playable character. I think this is not really an issue... :) - If this is not good, could you fix it yourself (since you kind of know what "solid" stands for now) :) --Khanassassin ☪ 13:02, 2 April 2012 (UTC)

Check it out. Does it look good now? :) --Khanassassin ☪ 13:10, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
Solid means "made from a single piece", transparent – "you can see through it". The typical glass is solid and transparent. These words describe different properties and can't be used to oppose each other, specifically in game interface engine. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 13:29, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
Does this change correctly explain the property in question? — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 13:37, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
Yes, it's better --Khanassassin ☪ 13:40, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
I added the authors. But, the YouTube videos are actually official TEDx YouTube videos, which is considered a reliable source. :) --Khanassassin ☪ 13:52, 2 April 2012 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Virtual Theatre. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120315094822/http://revolution.co.uk/?page_id=5&game_id=4&platform_id=0 to http://revolution.co.uk/?page_id=5&game_id=4&platform_id=0
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:14, 10 January 2018 (UTC)