# Talk:St Chad's Church, Poulton-le-Fylde

This review is transcluded from Talk:St Chad's Church, Poulton-le-Fylde/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Pyrotec (talk) 10:01, 22 May 2011 (UTC)

I will review. Pyrotec (talk) 10:01, 22 May 2011 (UTC)


### Initial comments
I've had a quick read of the article, but have not yet checked any of the citations, etc; and, on that basis, the article appears to be at or about GA-standard. I'm, now going to work my way through the article section by section by leaving the WP:Lead until last. Pyrotec (talk) 13:46, 26 May 2011 (UTC) At this point I will only be highlighting "problems", if any although I may fix any trivial ones as I work my way through the article.
I found no "problems", so the rest of this subsection is blank. Pyrotec (talk) 14:49, 26 May 2011 (UTC)


### Overall summary
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

A comprehensive, well-referenced, well-illustrated article.
Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality: 

B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists: 

Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources: 

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary: 

C. No original research: 

Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects: 

B. Focused: 

Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias: 

Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc: 

Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales: 
Well illustrated, with most of the photographs provided by the nominator.
B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions: 

Overall:
Pass or Fail: 

I'm awarding this article GA-status. Congratulations on producing a fine article. Pyrotec (talk) 14:49, 26 May 2011 (UTC)