# Talk:Siege of Savage's Old Fields

This review is transcluded from Talk:Siege of Savage's Old Fields/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: MathewTownsend (talk · contribs) 17:37, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

I will review this article shortly. Looks good!  MathewTownsend (talk) 17:37, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
GA review-see WP:WIAGA for  criteria (and here for what they are not)

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose: clear and concise, correct spelling and grammar:

B. Complies with  MoS for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation: 

Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. Provides references to all sources: 

B. Provides in-line citations from reliable sources where necessary: 
Off line sources AGF
C. No original research: 

Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Main aspects are addressed: 
Provides the historical setting
B. Remains focused: 

Does it follow the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc: 

Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales: 

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions: 

Overall:
Pass or Fail: 

Great article. I made a few edits which you are free to revert.[1] (Both by British and English spell checker spell "backcountry" as back country, so I changed it throughout the article.) I added some links for my own benefit so I could understand.
MathewTownsend (talk) 20:44, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

Thanks! Your edits look fine. Magic♪piano 01:58, 6 February 2012 (UTC)