# Talk:Port of Rijeka

...that might be useful: this one and this one. The latter is particularly interesting, as it appears that Yugoslav Navy Yacht Galeb (then called Kiebitz) was sunk there on the occasion. GregorB (talk) 20:29, 26 August 2011 (UTC)

Indeed the photos are useful, as is the Galeb tip. Thank you!--Tomobe03 (talk) 22:07, 26 August 2011 (UTC)

Tomobe, you may have one disambiguation page if you wanna fix it. 'Breakwater' to 'Breakwater (structure)'. Kebeta (talk) 18:32, 31 August 2011 (UTC)

Thanks.--Tomobe03 (talk) 18:46, 31 August 2011 (UTC)

Riječka luka je treća najbolja u svijetu!
Riječka luka među tri najbolje na svijetu
Timbouctou (talk) 15:22, 19 October 2011 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Port of Rijeka/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Tea with toast (talk · contribs) 17:03, 5 November 2011 (UTC)


### Small fixes needed
Hello! I am almost finished with the review, and there are two small items that need to be addressed:

In the "Transport facilities" section the acronyms "DIOKI" and "DINA" are used, but I can find nowhere in the article stating what those acronyms mean. Please define those terms. Thanks. --Tea with toast (話) 18:44, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
"DIOKI" and "DINA-petrokemija" (DINA-petrochemical) are actually company names normally spelled uppercase - see their websites [1], [2]. The two terms were originally coined as acronyms but those are not used neither officially by company registries, nor the companies themselves or press anymore - rather the names are now treated as proper names. Please also note that DINA-petrokemija is owned by DIOKI.--Tomobe03 (talk) 19:10, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
Thank you for clarifying. I assumed that since JANAF was an acronym, the others might be too. --Tea with toast (話) 02:03, 6 November 2011 (UTC)


### Review
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality: 

B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists: 

Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources: 

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary: 

C. No original research: 

Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects: 

B. Focused: 

Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias: 

Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc: 

Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales: 

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions: 

Overall:
Pass or Fail: 
Tea with toast (話) 02:03, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Port of Rijeka. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.vjesnik.hr/Article.aspx?ID=4AE71D51-480E-4CE6-AC47-D644E11DA3A9
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110502044910/http://www.dioki.hr/eng/o_petrokemija/p_lokacije1.asp to http://www.dioki.hr/eng/o_petrokemija/p_lokacije1.asp
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110902234646/http://www.agencija-zolpp.hr/Brodskelinije/tabid/1267/Default.aspx to http://www.agencija-zolpp.hr/Brodskelinije/tabid/1267/Default.aspx
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120331065712/http://www.it-hr.eu/UpDownLoad/File/IIIForum/RUKAVINA_OMISALJ%20TERMINAL.pdf to http://www.it-hr.eu/UpDownLoad/File/IIIForum/RUKAVINA_OMISALJ%20TERMINAL.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:20, 22 May 2017 (UTC)