# Talk:Simon Byrne

Oh, surely this would pass on FAC? -- ALoan (Talk) 09:34, 26 March 2006 (UTC)

This article should ideally have been submitted to a peer review first. Green Giant 16:57, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
Why? Do you think peer review would add much of value that FAC won't? -- ALoan (Talk) 18:12, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
Whilst this article is interesting and informative, the poor quality English should surely have been improved significantly before it was submitted as a featured article....(unsigned edit by  User: FunkyJon 16:04, 9 September 2006

Giano - on fixing up the refs yesterdy, I noticed that the reference to Broughton's Rules toward the end currently uses Svinth, but there was an inline note that another reference is required. Could you possibly check if Svinth is right, or another ref is still needed.  Thanks.  -- ALoan (Talk) 08:56, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

No it is right the ref is here [1] direct quote below
"Mee, 2001, 105; "Burke was arrested, but exonerated. The death contributed to the introduction of London Prize Ring Rules, which prohibited seconds from carrying a nearly unconscious man to the mark. The new rules also prohibited spiked boots (most bouts were fought outdoors) and disqualified fighters who fell down without being hit (a common way of getting a rest under Broughton's Rules)."  It seems to be sufficiently referenced to my way of thinking, was that "needs reference" added yesterday, I haven't seen it there before? Giano | talk 09:15, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

Great - thanks.  I added that comment - it previously said <ref name="Svinth">Reference needed</ref>.[2]   I guess that probably happened by accident - I didn't do it when I did the references the first time [3] - but it is good to have cleared it up.  -- ALoan (Talk) 10:32, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Simon Byrne. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110716145509/http://www.ibroresearch.com/?p=164 to http://www.ibroresearch.com/?p=164
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100910115336/http://mkheritage.co.uk/ogb/history1.html to http://www.mkheritage.co.uk/ogb/history1.html
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927010605/http://www.nls.uk/broadsides/broadside.cfm/id/14618 to http://www.nls.uk/broadsides/broadside.cfm/id/14618
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:39, 20 January 2018 (UTC)