# Talk:WOI-DT

The changes make it sound like WOI is a PBS station. Are these changes correct or vandalism? Chris 02:07, 13 July 2007 (UTC)CRM

Image:WOI5.PNG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 04:55, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

While it might be nice to add in this station not running the Colbert SuperPAC commercial, it really isn't needed here as a tv station not running a commercial is not really notable.  TV stations do this all the time.  Nothing wrong with mentioning it on the Colbert SuperPAC page though since it could be notable for the SuperPAC itself.  IMHO  Mateinsixtynine (talk) 02:43, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on WOI-DT. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://archive.is/20130916223551/http://blogs.desmoinesregister.com/dmr/index.php/2013/09/16/nexstar-buys-woi-other-citadel-tv-stations-in-iowa/article to http://blogs.desmoinesregister.com/dmr/index.php/2013/09/16/nexstar-buys-woi-other-citadel-tv-stations-in-iowa/article
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130829004251/http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1082A2.pdf to http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1082A2.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:04, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:WOI-DT/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: Sammi Brie (talk · contribs) 08:18, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: Dracophyllum (talk · contribs) 05:27, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

Hello, comments to follow. Dracophyllum 05:27, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for taking this on. I see you're not from the United States. It's my experience that reviews of my articles by non-American reviewers tend to result in questions about how American broadcasting works; please feel free to ask. Sammi Brie (she/her · t · c) 05:35, 10 March 2025 (UTC)
1a)
WHO-TV and KRNT-TV became major competitors, and deprived of its monopoly, WOI-TV suffered financially, losing money in four consecutive fiscal years and because Iowa State's educational programming did not make money. || could be reworded a little better.
Iowa State got a new president: Gordon Eaton, who stated it would be his decision whether to sell the station or not -hyperlink is incorrect as the skier is someone else.
prose otherwise flawless.
@Dracophyllum: Fixed. Turns out our article on the university president is Gordon P. Eaton. Sammi Brie (she/her · t · c) 17:25, 10 March 2025 (UTC)
1b) MOS good, although lede is a little too lengthy, would be better at around ~400 words Dracophyllum 08:21, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
I appreciate the thought, but this station is unusual in ways that dominate the article and require a longer lead section. I trimmed it a bit (to 557 words), but I really don't think I can comfortably trim much more. Sammi Brie (she/her · t · c) 16:36, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
2a) ref layout consistent Y
2b) refs reliable Y
2c) spotchecking...
Where do you get the  "and captured between 12 and 14 percent" figure from, I can't see it in the ref.
Page 4-L column 2: He said WOI-TV gets only about 12 to 14 per cent of the advertising in the three-station Des Moines-Ames market area, and unlike other stations has no advertising salesmen attempting to sell local ads.
Same with the: "revenue of $7 million in 1981; WOI-TV only garnered $4 million figures," are there parts of the clipping I can't see? Dracophyllum 08:21, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
Page 7A, column 2: A proxy statement prepared in connection with the spin-off of Cowles Broadcasting Corp. fron its now-liquidated parent, Cowles Communications Inc., suggests that KCCI-TV's revenue in 1981 was about $7 million. WOI-TV's revenue in the same year was $4 million, more than 40 percent behind the market leader. @Dracophyllum: Multipage clippings are common with me, and the second or further pages are always linked in the page field. Sammi Brie (she/her · t · c) 16:26, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
Otherwise clean
2d) earwig is clean Y
3a) Article covers all needed sections Y
3b) focus good Y
4) article info is presented neutrally Y
5. Article is stable Y
6a. Pics are freely licensed Y
6b. Pics are relevant Y
Otherwise excellent @Sammi Brie: Dracophyllum 08:21, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
Ok, passing now. Dracophyllum 21:17, 11 March 2025 (UTC)