# Talk:Tupolev Tu-80

This review is transcluded from Talk:Tupolev Tu-80/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Thurgate (talk) 00:19, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)
It is reasonably well written.
prose:   (MoS): 

It is factually accurate and verifiable.

It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 

It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars etc.: 

It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 

Overall:
Pass/Fail: 


### Comments
1. and adding fuel capacity. Suggest - and a higher fuel capacity.
2.  and a top speed of 620 km/h (390 mph). Suggest -  and have a top speed of 620 km/h (390 mph).

I've reworded both, see how you like them now. Thanks for the review.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 22:18, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
I've put the article on hold for seven days to allow you to address the issues I've brought up. Feel free to contact me on my talk page, or here with any concerns. Thurgate (talk) 00:19, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
Nice work Strum. Passed. Thurgate (talk) 00:41, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

"Bleed air" is a terminology used by jet or turbine-powered aircraft that use some of the compressed air from their own compressors for various purposes. Among those is the "bleed air deicer". I'm not clear on how a piston-engine aircraft can even have bleed air to power deicers, as stated in the article. Perhaps it has oversized turbochargers and it's bled off from that? The only other thing I can think of is that it has an air compressor specifically to compress air to deice the wings. If it's the former, it would be nice to have it explained, if it's the second, it's not technically bleed air, and therefore not technically a bleed air deicer. One could say "it used air to deice the wings, similar to a bleed air deicer", but it is not a bleed air deicer if it's not a turbine-powered aircraft.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by .45Colt (talk • contribs) 14:51, 9 February 2014 (UTC)