# Talk:Sam Oldham

This review is transcluded from Talk:Sam Oldham/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Hurricanehink (talk) 03:22, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
I was going to just add some comments, but I saw there was a GAN going on. The first thing that stood out to me was the sourcing in the lede. The lede should be a summary of the article, so anything up there doesn't need to be sourced. That said, it'd be good if the (minimal) sourced info from the lede could appear later in the article (personal life). I'm not familiar with sports athletes, but as with any person, basic biographical details are needed (such as where he was born, who were his parents, schooling, etc). 
The prose is generally good. 

I feel that the first sentence of "Junior career" should be split, since it's a bit long-winded.
"and for sweeping all seven golds on offer at the English national championships." - maybe I'm missing something, but what does "on offer" mean?
All in all looks pretty good. I won't pass it yet, but it's pretty close. --Hurricanehink (talk) 03:22, 10 October 2010 (UTC)

Thanks. All fixed. Strange Passerby (talk • c • status) 06:34, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
Looks good, I'll pass it. Hurricanehink (talk) 14:59, 10 October 2010 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Sam Oldham. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20101204071551/http://www.samoldham.co.uk:80/diary.html to http://www.samoldham.co.uk/diary.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 22:11, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

Tried the first three. Nada. Tony (talk) 06:47, 15 January 2019 (UTC)