# Talk:Women of Britain Say 'Go!'

"Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems" - "neutral"? "neutral"? - it's about as "neutral" as Vladimir Putin's approach to Ukraine.

"The poster utilises gender, guilt and emasculation to emphasise its message." That sentence, for example, reads like a statement of fact, when it is nothing other than an opinion, and one which reeks of Presentism and Chronocentrism.

If anyone is in need of a reminder: 
[[1]]

Referencing a bunch of books by Sociologists who use ludicrous, fantasy terms like "Gendered Anxieties", while not even acknowledging that other points of view may even exist, let alone mentioning what they might be, does not constitute neutrality.

The article might as well say "This poster was evil, and E. J. Kealey as well as the Parliamentary Recruitment Committee should have been burnt at the stake", such is the disparaging nature of the existing text towards the poster.

Hello, the lead of the article summarises the article body which is why the line you quoted is stated factually. The article body has citations throughout which you can check. I think the sources are pretty representative of the breadth of the subject, but please feel free to suggest alternative sources. Unexpectedlydian♯4talk‽ 21:45, 18 March 2023 (UTC)