# Talk:Radetzky-class battleship

Possibly the best Pre-dreadnought type of ships? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.3.172.87 (talk • contribs) 03:48, 25 May 2007

This review is transcluded from Talk:Radetzky class battleship/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
GA review:
Prose, looks very good, per usual.  MoS also fine, for GA purposes.  Images are good. Context yest, scope, yes.  Focus, yes. Citations and sources are fine.  No edit wars.  Always a good thing. 
I'd like to see at least a sentence on the name "Radesky" and the names of the ships.  Give them an historical context. I made a couple of very very very small tweaks, one word usage, and the other punctuation.  Let me know when you've added the sentences, this is a pass, of course.  Auntieruth55 (talk) 00:12, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
Added namesakes for the ships

The use of large-caliber secondary batteries wasn't unusual for late predreadnoughts, pretty much every battleship-building navy had gone in for it except for the German and Russian navies-- the US Connecticut class battleships had 8" secondary guns, the French Dantons had 9.4" secondary guns, the Italian Regina Elena class had 8" guns, and several classes of British pre-dreadnought (e.g. King Edward VIIs and Lord Nelsons)had 9.2-inch guns in this role.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thunderthief (talk • contribs) 03:13, 23 May 2014 (UTC)