# Talk:Squirtle

Passed. Appropriate references, gives a good explanation of what the creature is, and has competent sections on what role was played in the video games. I'm somewhat dissapointed the article did not posess a charteristics section like others I'd noted of this type, though. This may be attributed to the data on the creature. -ZeroTalk 19:57, 11 June 2006 (UTC)

It does, but it's merged with the lead ofr being a bit short. The Pokédex seems to say less about Squirtle than some others. Regards, —Celestianpower háblame 22:26, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
How the hell did this pass and Combusken not? Wikipedia is against chickens! :O Highway Rainbow Sneakers 22:28, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
I'm not sure; I didn't review Combusken. -ZeroTalk 04:20, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
I know, but it has about three times as many refs. Highway Rainbow Sneakers 07:15, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
Some reviewers are harsher than others, and that's their perogative, I'm afraid. Regards, —Celestianpower háblame 07:36, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

No source for name origin.
Only one source in video games section.
Its ability in R/B against Gym Leaders is irrelevant. - A Link to the Past (talk) 20:15, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

He's playable in ssbb --23.112.40.177 (talk) 16:22, 19 October 2013 (UTC)

In the Design and charicteristics section, paragraph 2 states "However, host of the show Pokémon Talk claims that Squirtles is based on squirrels, his evidence being that he, "Loves Nuts."" This refences an unofficial YouTube series and should be removed. Time Vault (talk) 19:12, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

 Done ‑‑ElHef (Meep?) 20:04, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Squirtle/GA2. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: Pokelego999 (talk · contribs) 13:48, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Nominator: Pokelego999 (talk · contribs) 13:48, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: Joseph Buell (talk · contribs) 17:22, 11 May 2024 (UTC)

I submit this review of the 00:05, 21 April 2024 revision of Squirtle.

Joseph Buell (talk) 18:17, 11 May 2024 (UTC)Joseph Buell

@Joseph Buell Just checking in. When do you believe you will be able to review the article? Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 12:46, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
The soonest I can review satisfactorily would likely be June. Joseph Buell (talk) 13:16, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
@Joseph Buell if I may inquire, when in June? Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 18:27, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
You may not. Probably the 31st. Joseph Buell (talk) 23:52, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
@Joseph Buell: I'm going to close this nomination and open up a new one. Reviewers are expected to actually review the article within a reasonable time frame, not just squat on the review preventing anyone else from doing it, and 6-7 weeks is way outside of a reasonable time frame. Please familiarize yourself with the GAN reviewing process before picking up another review.
Additionally, please familiarize yourself with Wikipedia:Civility, which is one of the central pillars of Wikipedia. Editors are expected to be civil with each other, and your rude reply above crosses the line. --PresN 19:01, 3 June 2024 (UTC)