# Talk:Tropical Storm Josephine (1996)

Content is not bad but it needs to be expanded if this article is to be kept.  Mention could be made of the hurricane's effects on north carolina, in relation to Bertha and Fran and flooding issues. — jdorje (talk) 04:29, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

Is this article really nessesary? The storm isn't notable and there isn't that much info in it. -- §HurricaneERIC§Damagesarchive 14:15, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

Sounds good. Hurricanehink 16:11, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
No, this storm has enough info that it could stay. Against Merge E-Series 17:35, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
agreed Against Merge Storm05 17:36, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
No opinion.  The only reason to keep this really is the rainfall graphic.  If it's merged, where would we put that?  If you want to put it in the season article (along with the other 2 pics for the storm) go ahead. — jdorje (talk) 18:46, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

Alright, I'll merge it and bring the rainfall pic. Hurricanehink 20:22, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

Back from the grave, eh? More info, and spelling and grammar fixes are needed. Hurricanehink (talk) 15:07, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Tropical Storm Josephine (1996)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Retrolord (talk · contribs) 13:43, 7 July 2013 (UTC)
Happy to review this. Expect initial comments soon, ★★RetroLord★★ 13:43, 7 July 2013 (UTC)

Hey, just curious if you forgot about this. :) Hurricanehink mobile (talk) 23:45, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
Whoops, will do this now. Sorry, ★★RetroLord★★ 03:52, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
Some points,
In these articles do you usually cite the stuff in the infobox? ★★RetroLord★★ 04:57, 13 July 2013 (UTC)

Not usually. The infobox info is derived from the article itself. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk)  13:24, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
For the first paragraph in meteorological history, it is entirely sourced from "Tropical Storm Josephine Preliminary Report﻿" apart fromt the last sentence? ★★RetroLord★★ 04:57, 13 July 2013 (UTC)

That is correct. It's all from the tropical cyclone report, up to the second to last sentence. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk)  13:24, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
Images and stability are ok also, NPOV seems ok, OR seems ok, Doesn't seem to be any undue weight or excessive detail anywhere. A good article no doubt, expect me to pass this soon. Thanks, ★★RetroLord★★ 04:57, 13 July 2013 (UTC)

Thanks! --♫ Hurricanehink (talk)  13:24, 13 July 2013 (UTC)