# Talk:Shin Megami Tensei IV: Apocalypse

Shin Megami Tensei IV: Final takes place in the 2030s. Fifteen years prior, a devastating war was waged between the Angels and the armies of Lucifer. To protect Tokyo from damage, a great rock dome was created. While it protected Tokyo, resources became progressively scarcer over the following twenty-five years,
@ProtoDrake: Am I reading this incorrectly, or does it just not make sense? Fifteen years prior to the present, there was a war. Then twenty-five years of scarce resources followed? So is the present 15 or 25 years after the war? Or does this try to say that fifteen years of scarce resources have passed, and there's gonna be another ten years like that? Another thing I've noticed is that some sources say the game came about because the developers wanted to make a Team Maniacs-style game or whatever, while some say the developers originally wanted to make a Maniax-style version of SMTIV. The second one makes more sense to me, because of the "Ultimately, they decided that they wanted to make a completely new title", but I'm not 100% sure.--IDVtalk 23:08, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

I used the Famitsu interview, which is translated as saying that they wanted to do something indicative of their team. As to the years thing, that was an honest mistake on my part and has been corrected. --ProtoDrake (talk) 07:04, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
All right, then. Thanks for fixing the time thing.--IDVtalk 08:21, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Shin Megami Tensei IV: Apocalypse/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Shooterwalker (talk · contribs) 16:38, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

About to take this on. Going to work through this section by section, and then come back to the lead. I will let you know when I've reached a good point. Shooterwalker (talk) 16:38, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

Gameplay

The first two sentences of the gameplay section could use some work. Imagine that this will be a lot of peoples' introduction to the subject matter, so it's important to explain the main point and not clutter it with too much info. You can always add more detail after. Let me know if you want more feedback or suggestions.
Maybe an additional sentence explaining what the game plays like (genre, etc). I've added such. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 09:34, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
"Navigation is done from a third-person perspective through local environments and using an overhead worldmap." -> "The player navigates local environments with a third-person perspective, with the aid of an overhead worldmap."
Changed. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 09:34, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
"As the protagonist gains a level" -> "When the protagonist gains a level"
Changed Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 09:34, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
"one of the supporting cast which has an automated turn and their own unique demon roster, giving them a different set of abilities" -> "an automated companion with a unique demon roster, giving them a different set of abilities."
Changed Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 09:34, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
"previous entries in the Shin Megami Tensei series" -> "previous entries in series" (it's implied)
Usually, I'd agree - but the Shin Megami Tensei series is a bit... confusing. I think it is worth explaining we don't mean Megami Tensei or Persona. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 09:34, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
"It also grants boosts to certain skills a character possesses" -> "It also grants temporary bonuses to a character's skills."
Changed Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 09:34, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
"In addition to fighting them, demons can be persuaded to join the party through negotiation, this being the only way to gather a playable party" -> "In addition to fighting demons, they can also be persuaded to join the player's side, as the only way to gather a party."
Changed Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 09:34, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
"If a demon agrees to join but Nanashi's level is too low, another demon is called in to take the first demon's place. If a demon does not immediately attack, it is open to negotiation and can be persuaded to join." -> switch the order of these two sentences, for flow and organization
Agreed Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 09:34, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
"Once part of the party, demons can be talked with, and can grant status buffs and grant new skills to Nanashi." -> "Once part of the party, demons can engage in dialog, and grant skills and bonuses to Nanashi."
Done, although "dialogue". Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 10:03, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
The sources appear to check out here.
Setting and characters

"To protect Tokyo from damage, a great rock dome was created. While it protected Tokyo, resources became progressively scarcer over the following years, while angels and demons ruled over humans." -> "[Someone] created a great rock dome to protect Tokyo from damage, but this also caused resources to become progressively more scarce. Humans continued to be ruled by angels and demons."
I'm not convinced this is an improvement. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 10:03, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
I know the real-world concepts of Odin / Krishna YHWH, but who are they to Dagda / Nanashi / in this world? It might be worth just separating the pantheon out into their own sentence, so you can explain who they even are. Alternatively, you could break out a separate paragraph or section where you introduce the key characters.
Hmm, they are pretty much dealt with the same way as they are in real-world, just that they are physical, rather than metaphysical. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 10:03, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
"The storyline takes an alternate turn from the beginning of the previous game's neutral route" -> it's not clear what this means. You might need to break this apart into its own sentence. "In the previous game, X happens. This time, the story takes a different direction, with ..."
I'm not convinced it's really that alternative, more that it follows from the neutral route. I have reworded. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 10:03, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
"The story does not follow the previous game's three-tiered moral alignment system" -> this also might not make much sense in the context of a single article. It might be fine to just describe the different endings and how they are framed, without any description of a moral/immoral ending.
Maybe "moral" is the wrong word. More alignment. I have reworded slightly. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 10:03, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
Plot

The first sentence here is very redundant to the previous setting section. I actually think it makes more sense here, and you can use the previous section just to give players context about the overall characters and setting.
Do you mean the one in the opening section? Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 21:22, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
"the revived" -> just cut it as it's implied
Done Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 21:22, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
"in order to make his dream a reality" -> also worth cutting as it's implied by Krisha's stated goals
Done Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 21:22, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
"fix their mistake" -> if the mistake is releasing Krishna, this is also redundant with their goal of defeating Krishna.
Done Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 21:22, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
"Nanashi and his companions defeat Shesha, infiltrate Krishna's base in Tsukiji Konganji, defeat Krishna, and rescue Flynn" -> "Nanashi and his companions defeat Shesha, defeat Krishna at his base in Tsukiji Konganji, and rescue Flynn."
Done Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 21:22, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
"and Lucifer and his demons" -> ", as well as Lucifer and his demons" (comma helps make this flow better)
Done Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 21:22, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
"Nanashi has the option of siding with Merkabah; in which case Tokyo is destroyed and a kingdom of God is established in Mikado or with Lucifer; where Mikado is burned to the ground and the world descends into anarchy. If Nanashi remains on humanity's side, a massive three-way battle ensues, Lucifer and Merkabah are killed, and humanity emerges victorious." -> "Nanashi has the option of siding with Merkabah, Lucifer, or humanity. Supporting Merkabah will destroy Tokyo and transform Mikodo into the new Kingdom of God, while supporting Lucifer will destroy Mikodo and plunge the world into anarchy. Nanashi can lead humanity to victory if they kill both Lucifer and Merkabah in a massive three-way battle."
Done Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 21:22, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
"and explains that Krishna faked his own defeat and used Shesha to manipulate the Hunters into getting rid of the angels and demons" -> "and explains that Krishna faked his own defeat to manipulate the Hunters into eliminating the angels and demons."
Done Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 21:22, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
"but he defeats him and separates the two." -> the pronouns start to become ambiguous here and there's hopefully a better way to do this. Worst case, just use proper nouns.
Done Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 21:22, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Who's Stephen?
It's one of those weird SMT things. It's basically Stephen Hawking, but as a being beyond god. I have zero idea how to explain this. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 21:22, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
"Dagda resurrects Flynn and a companion of Nanashi's choice to be brainwashed into serving as his Godslayer and Goddess, respectively." -> I understand this on a few reads, but there's probably a cleaner way to phrase this
Done Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 21:24, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
"wiping out" -> this is sort of a slang tone and could be phrased more clearly
Done Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 21:24, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
"The old universe dies and is reborn as a new universe where humans are free from all outside influence, and Dagda fades away, leaving Nanashi to rule his new creation." -> probably break this into two sentences, for flow and clarity.
Done Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 21:24, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Going to pause it there, but I'll come back to this again soon to continue. Shooterwalker (talk) 18:11, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
Continuing from where I left off...


#### Development
"Shin Megami Tensei IV: Apocalypse was born out of discussions about what Team Maniacs, the makers of Shin Megami Tensei IV, could do that was characteristic of their team" -> this doesn't really say very much for all the words. Is there a shorter way to say the same thing?
Done Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 21:36, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
"Ultimately, they decided that they wanted to make a completely new title as opposed to an upgraded re-release: as they wanted the game to "make everything clear", they added the word "Final" to the title." -> "Ultimately, they decided to make a new title as opposed to an upgraded re-release, and added the word "Final" to the title to make this clear."
Done Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 21:36, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
"for the game to improve and refine some aspects while keeping others" -> can probably cut this as it's implied by looking at feedback
Done Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 21:36, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Move the parts about the story's main themes into the next paragraph, where you start to discuss story themes there too. Keep the first paragraph about the assembly of the team.
Done Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 21:36, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
That said, the second time you bring up themes, it's not clear what it means that the age and class of the character relates to the story's themes. I'm sure they do, it just needs a clearer explanation.
Done Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 21:36, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
The music might fit better in the team paragraph as well.
The "90% complete" statement fits better with the announcement piece in the next section.
Done Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 21:36, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Promotion and release

This can be a section instead of subsection
No problem Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 21:41, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
"The localization team's main task in this respect, once they had Atlus' permission to make necessary alterations, was to create a name that would give the same implications as the Japanese title while being easier for Western players to understand." -> As this whole paragraph tells the story about changing the subtitle (the summary provided by the first sentence), I'd rephrase this second sentence to explain clearly that the localization team took their time with this decision.
I think this is suitable now. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 21:41, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Consider moving the localization section to the development, as this is about more than the release.
Done Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 21:41, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
The sources appear to check out.
Excellent


#### Reception
"with Heidi Kemp writing for GameSpot stating Apocalypse had an amazing sense of visual design" -> "with Heidi Kemp of GameSpot stating that Apocalypse had an amazing sense of visual design"
Done Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 21:51, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
"the game's quality of life changes over those found in IV" -> "the game's quality of life improvements since the previous title"
Done Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 21:51, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
"called them" -> "called the visuals"
Done Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 21:51, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
maybe remove the quotes for the translation, since a translation is effectively a summary in a different language
Done Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 21:51, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
"Chris Carter writing for Destructoid stated the graphics were "drab", but suggested it was more due to the limitations of the 3DS" -> "Chris Carter writing for Destructoid stated the graphics were "drab", attributing this to the limitations of the 3DS"
Done Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 21:51, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
You're back to the quality of life stuff in the second paragraph. Consider removing it from the paragraph, to avoid the redundancy.
Done Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 21:51, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
"whilst Forte commented on the large improvements on the in-game map being a positive" -> "while Forte noted the improvements to the game's map system."
Done Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 21:51, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
"Apocalypse was critiqued in places for the in-game universe being the same as that in IV." -> "The in-game universe of Apocalypse was criticized for being too similar to that of the previous game."
Done Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 21:51, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
It's not clear that the Kotaku article "expected" it to just be an update, and I'd likely remove this from the reception. The article is mostly a summary of press release type material.
Done Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 21:51, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Move the sales figures to the top of the reception, before getting into the critical stuff. It will flow better.
Done Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 21:51, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
We can pause here. This should allow a lot of improvements and get the article well on its way to GA. It can get there with some work. Shooterwalker (talk) 19:37, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
Seems like mostly prose and tone stuff, which is fair enough. I've got quite a few reviews open and not much time, so apologies if it take a bit of time to complete! Bare with me. :). Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 09:34, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
Take your time. Good luck with everything. Shooterwalker (talk) 13:49, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
That should now be all of the above Shooterwalker Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 21:51, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
This looks generally good. A few last comments to hopefully wrap this up:
The lead describes this as an "alternative" timeline, but it doesn't seem to be supported in the article itself, or the sources.
Maybe briefly summarize the sales in the lead, just to give the second paragraph more thoroughness and information.
"Dagda and Odin into freeing Krishna from a prison made by YHVH," -> I'm guessing these are all related to the deities, but maybe just set up the concept a bit in the character paragraph. Something as simple as, "The story incorporates folklore from ancient religions, including deities such as Krishna, Odin, and YHVH."
"There are multiple endings, with both of the primary endings are neutral" -> grammar ("and" both of the primary endings?)
"creatinh" -> "creating"
... actually this whole sentence could be constructed more simply: "The localization team took their time to make this change in creatinh a name that would give the same implications as the Japanese title while being easier for Western players to understand" -> "The localization took their time to select a name that..."
There's an extra line break in the development section.
"Toshi Nakamura for Kotaku held an expectation of Apocalypse being an update to the game or a DLC rather than a brand new game." -> I reiterate, I don't think the article supports this statement, and the article reads more like a news report than an actual review. I'd drop it entirely.
"Daniel Tack in a Game Informer piece commented" -> "Writing for Game Informer, Daniel Tack commented"
"whilst Forte highlighted in his article that Apocalypse was" -> "while Forte wrote that the game was"
I think that would be everything. Shooterwalker (talk) 17:28, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
Hi Shooterwalker, I have covered the above Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 14:15, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
Went ahead and did a couple minor fixes just to take this across the finish line. Great job, and happy to give this GA nomination a pass. If you have some time, I have a game FA nomination that could use another pair of eyes. Shooterwalker (talk) 22:47, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

Shortly before the game's release in Japan, Hindu leader Rajan Zed issued a public statement protesting the game's depiction of Krishna. Is this fact notable enough for inclusion in the "Reception" section? AFriendlyIrin (talk) 15:20, 9 August 2023 (UTC)