# Talk:Scream (roller coaster)

wasnt the area the ride in just a enced off area in the parking lot and hey just started building the ride??  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dpshuler (talk • contribs) 19:45, 31 March 2008 (UTC) 

This review is transcluded from Talk:Scream (roller coaster)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: The Rambling Man (talk · contribs) 15:34, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
Comments

Three-sentence lead is a little brief, try to make sure you summarise all the sections of the article.
Why is "Floorless Coaster" capitalised?
"Scream for the 2003 season.[6] Scream would be the park's sixteenth roller coaster.[7]" ->"Scream for the 2003 season,[6] making it the park's sixteenth roller coaster.[7]"
" hourly capacity of 1440 riders per hour" two things, one -> 1,440 for consistency with the rest of the article and two -> you don't need both hourly and per hour.
No point in abbreviated OTSR if you don't use it.
"station" is overlinked.
"[8][6][12]" numerical order please.
"Best Steel-Tracked Roller Coaster" -> " Best steel-tracked roller coaster"
Put an en-dash in 2011.
Check refs for en-dash, e.g. ref 21's title.
Consistent date format, e.g. compare ref 11 with ref 12.
Not too much wrong here, so on hold for a week.  The Rambling Man (talk) 17:37, 24 July 2013 (UTC)

@The Rambling Man: I have addressed all but your second issue. Floorless Coaster is capitalised because it is the name of a product/model of roller coaster offered by Bolliger & Mabillard (see the article for details). When the term is used descriptively, I have not capitalised it. Themeparkgc  Talk  03:41, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
Just one picky moment, can you add "format=pdf" to the refs which need it?  Then I think we're done.  The Rambling Man (talk) 16:49, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
@The Rambling Man:  Done Themeparkgc  Talk  00:01, 26 July 2013 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Scream (roller coaster). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131019224523/http://www.goldenticketawards.com/issuearchive/1999gta/1999gta.pdf to http://www.goldenticketawards.com/issuearchive/1999gta/1999gta.pdf
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131019224730/http://www.goldenticketawards.com/issuearchive/2005gta/2005gta.pdf to http://www.goldenticketawards.com/issuearchive/2005gta/2005gta.pdf
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130505080254/http://www.goldenticketawards.com/issuearchive/2006gta/2006gta.pdf to http://www.goldenticketawards.com/issuearchive/2006gta/2006gta.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:57, 20 April 2017 (UTC)