# Talk:Washington State Route 536

This review is transcluded from Talk:Washington State Route 536/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: TCN7JM (talk · contribs) 15:37, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
Sometime this weekend (but you know me by now, that means I'll do it right now). –TCN7JM 15:37, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
Infobox

Isn't SR 20 the north end? Either way, I'm also wondering why it's north–east and not west–east. Did the DOT sign it like that?
Huge blunder on my part. Fixed.
Route description

Located is used twice in the first sentence. You ought to change one of these.
"The highway travel east" Self-explanatory
History

"ending at U.S. Route 99.[15][16] US 99" US 99 needs to be used in parentheses before being used in the following sentence as an abbreviation.
"SR 20 was extended west to Whidbey Island and the Olympic Peninsula over SR 536 and SR 525 in 1973, shortening the highway" Which highway? I know you mean SR 536, but you mention three highways before the comma, so you should specify.
Final verdict

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose):  b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): 

It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 

It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 

It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 

It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 
Overall: Not bad! I think this is the least amount of fixes you've needed to make yet.
Pass/Fail:
Fixed all problems. SounderBruce 21:54, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
I'll pass the article, but I forgot once again to mention that there is no info regarding pavement other than the repaving in 2009. Great work! –TCN7JM 01:18, 3 February 2013 (UTC)