# Talk:Soviet frigate Razyashchiy

Are NATO reporting names necessary for other ships?  It makes the prose very clunky, e.g. "...complement to the Project 1134A Berkut A (NATO reporting name 'Kresta II') and Project 1134B Berkut B (NATO reporting name 'Kara')..."
Are Russian translations necessary, again breaks up the prose. e.g. "designated Large Anti-Submarine Ship (Большой Противолодочный Корабль, BPK)"
And are all the permutations of displacement necessary, "Displacing 2,810 tonnes (2,770 long tons; 3,100 short tons) standard and 3,200 t (3,100 long tons; 3,500 short tons) full load," - it does not make for a nice read.  This is data that should be confined to a table.
If I had got to this GA review first I would have asked for consideration to be given to the amount of links - a lot of blue.  All necessary?
Mark83 (talk) 11:46, 19 November 2021 (UTC)