# Talk:Written Chinese

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Written Chinese. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110815174116/http://english.education.edu.tw/ct.asp?xItem=7473&ctNode=1873&mp=12 to http://english.education.edu.tw/ct.asp?xItem=7473&ctNode=1873&mp=12
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:31, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect 中文 and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 12#中文 until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  CrazyBoy826 02:39, 12 April 2022 (UTC)

This section seems to conflate the scope of this article with that of Chinese characters and Chinese family of scripts—I've already removed its summary in the lead. While mention in passing is unavoidable and proper, I think the section should be mostly removed. Remsense诉 00:55, 18 February 2024 (UTC)

Yes, it does seem to be off-topic. Kanguole 10:25, 18 February 2024 (UTC)