# Talk:Svalbard and Jan Mayen

page is needed for the incoming redirect from ISO 3166-1:SJ

I put a tribute to these places here after having visited them. if it's inapropriate feel free to discuss it on my talk page on http://www.wikitravel.org - The Snackmaster (Check out my excellent guides and give feedback) "Let's all grow together" - Who was it???
Thanks for editing, but it's important that edits are sourced and neutral, and yours have an opinion and no sources. But please read WP:5P and keep editing! Snoutwood (talk) 04:31, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

Please add something about .sj. Thanks. --91.138.4.97 11:43, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

Since added. -- Beland (talk) 15:51, 3 December 2008 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Svalbard and Jan Mayen/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 15:07, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.
Disambiguations: none found
Linkrot: one found and fixed.[1] Jezhotwells (talk) 15:26, 7 November 2010 (UTC)


### Checking against GA criteria
GA review (see here for criteria)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose):  b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): 
I made one minor copy-edit.[2]
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 
All references appear reliable and check out.
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 
Thorough, broad and focussed.
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 

It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 
On image used, tagged and captioned
Overall:
Pass/Fail: 
Fine, I find no problems with this artcile.  Happy to pass as GA status. Jezhotwells (talk) 15:37, 7 November 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for taking the time to review the article :) Arsenikk (talk) 15:44, 7 November 2010 (UTC)

There’s seems to be an disproportionate focus on the ISO registrations in this article? Jo Jc Jo (talk) 10:10, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

It's the topic of the article. There's not much else to discuss about the two areas in conjunction with each other that doesn't also apply to other areas of Norway. CMD (talk) 15:28, 13 February 2022 (UTC)