# Talk:Thick as a Brick

Could someone explain which part(s) of this album are used in the radio edit?

It's pretty much the first 3 minutes, right up to where the acoustic guitar stops (just after "spin me down the long ages let them sing the song") and the band go into the 5/4 section. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 17:11, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

I've tried to explain what some of the lyrics mean but I'm not too happy with the way they came out. CambridgeBayWeather 07:45, 7 October 2005 (UTC)

Perhaps a table would fit better... --Emc² (Contact me ) 13:53, 30 April 2006 (UTC)

wouldn't it be better if Gerald Bostock were merged with this article? — goethean ॐ 16:43, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

The album cover for the 25th Anniversary edition is slightly different from the art that’s currently shown in the article, so I’m going to add it as an alternate cover. If you have any qualms, explain them below. —BrOnXbOmBr21 06:39, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

Image:ThickAsABrick25thAnniv.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.\

Don't you think that this is written too informallly? Especially the section about the title of the song, it's like talking with a fan of Jethro Tull. I think it is no appropriate for Wikipedia.--78.84.184.201 (talk) 11:18, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
BetacommandBot (talk) 02:29, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
I agree, completely inappropriate - and have removed it. 
Rrose Selavy (talk) 19:37, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

As should be capitalized. It's an adverb, not a preposition as it might seem. "To the same extent or degree; equally: The child sang as sweetly as a nightingale." for example.(ref)http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/as As at Dictionary.com(/ref) Pixel Eater (talk) 03:08, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

After reading this[[1]], I believe the lowercase is correct and should remain. This is an instance of the construction "as...as" with the first "as" only implied ("[as] thick as a brick"). In this structure, it's the (here omitted) first "as" that has the adverbial meaning of "equally." The second "as" is a preposition similar to "like." Richard K. Carson (talk) 07:03, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

This sentence worries me somewhat:

On April 3, 2012, Ian Anderson released a long-delayed sequel, "Thick As a Brick 2", ...
I have been following Jethro Tull for a quite a while now, and have never heard the idea that a sequel had been in the pipeline until last year. And nothing that Ian Anderson has said gives me the impression that he has been working on this until the last two years. "Long-delayed" is just pure hyperbole.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.130.71.68 (talk) 07:23, 29 May 2012 (UTC) 

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Thick as a Brick. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20130916070228/http://www.thickasabrickdeluxe.com/?utm_campaign=taab40th&utm_medium=web_link&utm_source=tull_facebook to http://www.thickasabrickdeluxe.com/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 04:40, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

Did it really not chart in the UK? Did it only chart in the US, Australia, and Canada? 146.198.128.142 (talk) 23:28, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

Cover inspired by? So any album cover that looks like a newspaper was also inspired by? 2001:56A:F414:D300:C010:DE2B:7B3F:774B (talk) 18:37, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

The description of how "Thick as a Brick" was recorded reminds me strongly of Echoes (Pink Floyd song), which was similarly pieced together with everyone contributing. As it seems that "Echoes" was released a year before "Thick as a Brick" it might be appropriate to mention this in the article, as a possible influence. --BjKa (talk) 00:14, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

I think it has more in common with Frank Zappa's work myself - musically challenging, stylistically all over the place, taxing for a casual listener, and topped off with a large dollop of silliness. However, I am no more a reliable source than you, so it can't go in. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:51, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

The original LP artwork should be used. The CD and the 25th anniversary editions should be removed. I found better versions of the artwork, like this one. Unsure about the gatefold image as it may belong to a section. --George Ho (talk) 03:57, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

@George Ho: Agreed; we don't need three non-free images on this article. They can be described broadly speaking as "the CD covers are crops of the LP that are not as good as the medium is smaller". I have moved the original LP cover to the main images and deleted the others per WP:CSD#F5. The images you linked to, however, don't show the full page which folds out from LP to A3 size. I have the original album and can do a higher-quality scan, but I think what we currently have is sufficient for a fair-use infobox illustration and doesn't need to be any better. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:21, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
Ooh... I would like to see a high-quality scan in PNG, Ritchie333, but I'll wait and hold my patience. :) George Ho (talk) 11:46, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
There doesn't appear to be a copy of the whole newspaper online that is a resolution where you can read it. I think you may be waiting a while, as the text is still in copyright so I can't just bung scans online. A shame that, as some of the silly prose in it is better than the actual music in places. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 12:17, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
What about 45worlds.com and discogs? By the way, I wonder whether the gatefold portion is necessary. George Ho (talk) 12:35, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Thick as a Brick. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111005165658/http://jethrotull.com/news/taabtour2012.html to http://jethrotull.com/news/taabtour2012.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:36, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

Why bother to include that idiots reviews on any progressive rock album? The dude has such a massive hate boner for prog rock it is actually rather absurd. 2407:7000:90E1:1000:D2D5:C142:61D0:2159 (talk) 19:21, 31 January 2025 (UTC)