# Talk:The Best Sleepover in the World

This review is transcluded from Talk:The Best Sleepover in the World/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk · contribs) 07:41, 27 May 2025 (UTC)
Reviewer: Pokelego999 (talk · contribs) 18:51, 16 July 2025 (UTC)

Hiya! Fulfilling my QPQ with this article. Given how many you've reviewed for me, feel free to reach out if you want me to do any more beyond just this one at any point. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 18:51, 16 July 2025 (UTC)


### Six GA Criteria
1. Article is well-written. Very minimal mistakes if any at all.
2. No OR, all info is cited in the article.
3. Coverage is broad in depth and focus. Shows multiple aspects of the character.
4. Article appears neutral, and does not appear to hold a significantly negative nor positive stance on the subject.
5. Article appears stable. Does not appear to have had any major vandalism occur.
6. Article uses one fair use image with proper rationale, and uses one music file with proper rationale.


### Lead
Minor, but I feel the in-universe info and out of universe info would be easier to understand when split into two paragraphs. (So everything after "Wilson wrote the sequel..." is a second paragraph)
"which renewed her interest." Could you clarify if and how she was disinterested beforehand? Right now this is a bit unclear.
Could you clarify what Makaton is for those unfamiliar? Additionally, "how Lily now communicates" is a bit confusing for those who are unfamiliar with the first book; could you clarify why she has changed how she communicates and how she communicated differently in the first book?


### Synopsis
Looks good.


### Development
Looks good.


### Release and promotion
Looks good.


### Reception
"as well the relationship between the sisters" is this in regard to making sure readers are aware of the sisters' relationship, or that the sisters' relationship was something praiseworthy? I'd reword this since the meaning is a bit unclear right now.
"that the rest of the books" are there multiple books? I assumed this was just discussing the one.


### Spotcheck
Reviewed sources 1, 3, and 7 as part of this spotcheck. For 3, what is the reliability of Sheerluxe? I'm not too familiar with the source. Regardless, the info does check out there, but do keep in mind only the archived link has the content; the live link links to books that are releasing now instead of when this book came out. 
All three check out info wise. 


### Overall
@DaniloDaysOfOurLives: the article looks very solid, just needs a few minor changes. Once the above are addressed let me know. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 18:51, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
@Pokelego999: Thank you so so much for your review! I have addressed everything! Also, thank you so much for your offer - I would love it if you reviewed another one of mine, but no pressure of course! :D DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 12:41, 18 July 2025 (UTC)

@DaniloDaysOfOurLives did a minor formatting change on the lead since I believe you may have misinterpreted which part of it I felt should be split up, but otherwise the changes look good. Happy to pass this, well done! I'll try to get another one of yours done at some point soon, once I've hit up my requisite pledge reviews for other nominations. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 16:41, 18 July 2025 (UTC)