# Talk:Peter (Fringe episode)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Peter (Fringe episode)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: BelovedFreak 19:56, 31 March 2011 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose):  b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): 
Well-written enough for GA, no major MoS concerns
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 
One source query below
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 

It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 
neutral and balanced
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 
No apparent problems with stability or content disputes
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 
Reasonable use of a non-free image, images are appropriately licensed.
Overall:
Pass/Fail: 

This is very close to being a good article. The only issue really is with one of the aources. I'm concerned about the reliability of MissGeeky.com. Can you comment on this? Some of the other sources seem to be borderline reliable (in my opinion) but have some support across WP (eg. at WP:RSN and WP:FAC), so I'm not too concerned.

1 disambiguation link fixed
No apparent problems with dead links
No apparent problems with plagiarism based on Corenbot, Earwig's tool and spot checks
Other suggestions (not required)
It might be clearer to explicitly state that the final part of the plot takes place in the present day (I assume the series as a whole is set in the present-day...)
Watch for overlinking, eg. television series and sunglasses - do we really need links to those articles?
""Peter" was set in 1985, with a much younger Walter Bishop, as well as his wife and son." - perhaps would be slightly less awkward as something like "Peter" was set in 1985, with a much younger Walter, Elizabeth and Peter Bishop.
I'll place this on hold to allow the issue of the source to be addressed. --BelovedFreak 20:42, 31 March 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for the review. The MissGeeky.com source displays an interview John Noble had with multiple journalists (the same interview is covered here and here for instance). I can replace the MissGeeky source with one of those, if you like. I've also addressed your optional concerns. Thanks again, Ruby2010 talk 20:58, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
I would be much happier with one of those sources. :) --BelovedFreak 21:02, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
Done :) Ruby2010 talk 21:06, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
Good stuff. I'm happy to list the article as a good article. Well done! --BelovedFreak 21:12, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
Thank you! Ruby2010 talk 21:16, 31 March 2011 (UTC)

Come on people, really? Peter (Fringe)?  Can we really say that this episode is the primary topic for Peter (Fringe)?  This should obviously be at Peter (Fringe episode). john k (talk) 18:33, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Peter (Fringe). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130808150433/http://www.youngartistawards.org/noms32.html to http://www.youngartistawards.org/noms32.html
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110313080722/http://www.fox.com/fringe/recaps/season-2/episode-16/ to http://www.fox.com/fringe/recaps/season-2/episode-16/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:38, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Peter (Fringe). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110616082536/http://www.ugo.com/tv/john-noble-fringe-interview to http://www.ugo.com/tv/john-noble-fringe-interview
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110522173741/http://www.tv.com/john-noble-teases-fringes-spring-premiere/story/22247.html to http://www.tv.com/john-noble-teases-fringes-spring-premiere/story/22247.html
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121011233349/http://www.fox.com/fringe/_ugc/images/science/ScienceOfFringe_215.pdf to http://www.fox.com/fringe/_ugc/images/science/ScienceOfFringe_215.pdf
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110130054603/http://www.nypost.com/p/blogs/popwrap/fringe_is_going_back_to_the_past_jZ3v36C83GAVjbw5pORlKI to http://www.nypost.com/p/blogs/popwrap/fringe_is_going_back_to_the_past_jZ3v36C83GAVjbw5pORlKI
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:50, 18 June 2017 (UTC)