# Talk:Virtual Boy Wario Land

I have been asked this twice already, so I'm going to go ahead and just put the logic here for future reference. 

The box says Virtual Boy Wario Land
The cartridge says Virtual Boy Wario Land
The title screen says Virtual Boy Wario Land
GameFAQs, MobyGames, GameSpot, and Planet Virtual Boy all refer to it as Virtual Boy Wario Land.
Note how it never says "Wario Land for Virtual Boy". The "Virtual Boy" is part of the subtitle of the game, much like how Eternal Darkness' full title is actually Eternal Darkness: Sanity's Requiem.
Most importantly: It's really just a rearangement of words from "Wario Land (Virtual Boy)", so what does it really matter? This way drops the parentheses and looks better.
SeizureDog 06:37, 17 June 2006 (UTC)

I was the only kid on my block that owned a virtual boy and this game, the tennis game, and some space themed shooter were the only ones worth owning on this system. However i think this was Either the best selling game for the virtual boy or the most well received by critics. That would be worth a mention in the article imo.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 138.88.34.81 (talk) 20:00, 4 October 2008 (UTC) 

http://retro.ign.com/articles/845/845487p1.html
http://www.mobygames.com/game/virtual-boy/virtual-boy-wario-land
http://nindb.classicgaming.gamespy.com/vue-vwc.shtml
http://www.themushroomkingdom.net/games/vbwl  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Judgesurreal777 (talk • contribs) 23:58, 12 February 2008 (UTC) 

It seems like the Nintendo Power rating was copied to Wikipedia wrong. The way it's written in the magazine is actually a bit odd: the magazine has a table labeled "Power Meter Ratings" and each game is listed under 4 categories.
https://archive.org/stream/Nintendo_Power_Issue001-Issue127/Nintendo%20Power%20Issue%20079%20December%201995#page/n111/mode/2up
Here are the "Power Meter Ratings" for Virtual Boy Wario Land:

I have no idea what the letters represent, but it looks like each number is out of 5, so should the rating at least be changed to out of 20 (16.9/20) if not removed completely?
CubeBag (talk) 22:39, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

Letters stand for "Graphics", "Playability", "Control", and "Total", I believe. The last number should be used, not added with the other numbers. Namcokid47 (Contribs) 22:50, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Fixed! Roberth Martinez (talk) 23:30, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Just as a follow-up, I've removed it from the reviews infobox. Per WP:STICKTOSOURCE we shouldn't interpret these ratings and averaging it. It gives the impression that publications (in this case Nintendo Power) gave it an overall rating. While they would later give overall marks, in this case, they did not. Andrzejbanas (talk) 14:34, 16 May 2024 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Virtual Boy Wario Land/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: KGRAMR (talk · contribs) 17:34, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: Pokelego999 (talk · contribs) 12:44, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Will take this on in the coming days. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 12:44, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Good job on getting the article nominated. - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 17:34, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
@KGRAMR (talk · contribs)


### Six GA Criteria
1. Article is well-written.
2. No OR, all info is cited in the article.
3. Coverage is broad in depth and focus. Shows multiple aspects of the game.
4. Article appears neutral, and does not appear to hold a significantly negative nor positive stance on the subject.
5. Article appears stable. Does not appear to have had any major vandalism occur.
6. Article uses two fair use images with proper rationale.


### Gameplay
-What is a coin cloud?

 Done -- It's a cloud which give crown coins. Roberth Martinez (talk) 21:20, 18 May 2024 (UTC)


### Development and release
-How was Totaka's song included?

 Done -- It's basically a easter egg Totaka hides in most of the games he worked on, with X on Game Boy being its earliest appearance. Roberth Martinez (talk) 21:20, 18 May 2024 (UTC)


### Reception
-Looks good


### Legacy
-Looks good


### Overall
-Fantastically written article overall. Just need clarification on these two points and I'll be happy to pass this. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 19:47, 18 May 2024 (UTC)

@Pokelego999:All done! Is there anything else left to touch upon? Roberth Martinez (talk) 21:20, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
Should be good. Happy to pass. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 22:41, 18 May 2024 (UTC)