# Talk:Possum (film)

Hello everyone. So I've been working on this article all by my lonesome for a little while now and I'm trying to get it up to GA status. However there still a couple of things that need to be worked on before that happens. For starters, the plot section needs to be expanded upon, and more information on the film's production will need to be added as well as the film's themes. I will be working on the latter sections (If any finds any more info related to these categories feel free to send me a link to them), so if anyone can write a more detailed version of the film's plot I would much appreciate it.--Paleface Jack (talk) 20:22, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

Hello everyone, I've been working on this article for quite some time now and I want to get this ready for GA status. All I need now is someone to add a more detailed plot on the film. If anyone is willing to do that please let me know. I've also been trying to find a public domain image of actor Sean Harris but have so far have come up empty. If you are able find an approprate image, please send me the link to it.--Paleface Jack (talk) 17:41, 27 November 2018 (UTC)

The Digital Fix's piece has unfairly been removed, despite the strong interview topic covered. 
If moderators wish not to name the writer, they can do so, but not to take it out on the piece.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Emnetinlurve (talk • contribs) 00:54, 10 March 2019 (UTC) 

Of course the problem is not this one piece but the large-scale spamming of Eoghan Lyng's writings all over Wikipedia, a violation of WP:REFSPAM. The discussion is still underway at WP:ANI#Linkspam citing Eoghan Lyng... Filter? That's the central place for talking about the issue, not here. Binksternet (talk) 01:50, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
Then remove the name of the writer, but keep the piece. Thank you.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Emnetinlurve (talk • contribs) 02:04, 10 March 2019 (UTC) 

Why is it so important? In fact, in the cited interview Holness breezes over the bit about Armstrong being unavailable at first, de-emphasising the scheduling adjustments that were made to fit him in. But here on Wikipedia the wording was inflated to make it seem more of an issue. I think that's a misrepresentation of the material. And of course any inclusion of Lyng's work is an insult to Wikipedia because of the systematic way that his writings have been added, to puff up the web presence of Lyng, as opposed to bring more enlightenment to the reader. Binksternet (talk) 02:45, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
And it's one I have apologised for multiple times; please stop defaming me!---Eoghan Lyng  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Colonel James Walker (talk • contribs) 18:56, 13 May 2020 (UTC)