# Talk:Within (The X-Files)

Since this article has been nominated for GA, its reception section really needs to be beefed up. All it has is a single critique from fans. There is no critical commentary present, which is essential for an episode article. Ωphois 00:30, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Within (The X-Files)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Wizardman Help review good articles 17:08, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
Upon looking through this article, it seems to need a lot of work. Here's what I found:

Why does it say (part 2) in the title? I can't find a part 1. Done
Plot should be sourced. Can be done in the same style as the Sleepless article. Done
There is no critical reception in the article, just some fan notes. Definitely needs fixing. Done
While the prose itself is fine, as noted above the couple issues I did find are pretty major. I'll put it on hold and give you a week to fix/expand the article. Wizardman Help review good articles 17:08, 1 January 2010 (UTC)

The issues are fixed, so I'll pass the article. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 16:55, 4 January 2010 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Within (The X-Files). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.space.com/sciencefiction/tv/xfiles_801_001106.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 09:03, 1 April 2016 (UTC)