# Talk:Point Stephens Light

This review is transcluded from Talk:Point Stephens Light/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 21:53, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.
Disambiguations: none found
Linkrot: none found Jezhotwells (talk) 21:54, 23 January 2011 (UTC)


### Checking against GA criteria
GA review (see here for criteria)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose):  b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): 
Prose and compliance with MoS fine, I made a few minor copy-edits.[1]
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 
References are to Rs, all check out.
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 
Fine
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 

It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 

Overall:
Pass/Fail: 
OK, I think this adequately meets the WP:GACR, so I am happy to list this. I am sorry that you have had to wait do long. Jezhotwells (talk) 22:10, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

Thanks you! --Muhandes (talk) 22:23, 23 January 2011 (UTC)