# Talk:Reid Blackburn

This review is transcluded from Talk:Reid Blackburn/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Juliancolton (talk) 00:40, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
The article is well-referenced, written from a neutral and professional point of view, and seems to cover Blackburn's life and career in an interesting manner. Passing the article in light of a lack of apparent problems. Juliancolton (talk) 00:40, 26 June 2011 (UTC)

Thanks! ceranthor 01:18, 26 June 2011 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Reid Blackburn. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050214171557/http://www.spokesmanreview.com:80/tools/story_pf.asp?ID=30799 to http://www.spokesmanreview.com/tools/story_pf.asp?ID=30799
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:15, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

The article describes the car as a Volvo 144 but many of the images in the commons describe it as a Volvo 164. Since we can't see any evidence of either below the window line, how do we know which model is correct? ---------User:DanTD (talk)  15:24, 24 March 2024 (UTC)