# Talk:Theatre Royal, Bath

What this article was should most certainly have been deleted, however, this is a significant UK provincial theatre and should be kept. I have added what I can, perhaps somebody can add more, including details of the architecture - this must be a listed building, too. --Richhoncho 18:38, 25 June 2006 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Theatre Royal, Bath/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Dr. Blofeld (talk · contribs) 14:28, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

OK Rodw, I've made most of the needed edits myself. You really do seem to have an issue with the use or lack of use of commas! The quality isn't great but I think it's passable. The only thing I'm going to question now is your claim that it is "one of the most important theatres", yet I see no source in the body to back it up. If a reputable institution claims it to be then say "cited by xxx as one of the most important theatres" and source it.♦ Dr. Blofeld 15:16, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for all your edits- my use of commas and apostrophes can leave something to be desired. The article doesn't say "most important" but "more important" however the only sources using that wording are mirrors of this article or Bath Spa which is trying to "sell" a course based at the Theatre Royal. The Theatres Trust does say "One of the most important surviving examples of Georgian theatre architecture" so I have changed it to that wording.— Rod talk 15:34, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
Could you beef up the lede a bit? Some mention of productions and the festivals I think would be good.
I've added some of the famous actors who performed - is this the sort of thing you meant?— Rod talk 16:01, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
Could you mention some of its most notable plays? Or are there too many to really only mention a few successfully? Where you say "During World War II Donald Wolfit, Irene Vanbrugh, John Gielgud and Sybil Thorndike performed, but audiences declined." you could add, appearing in productions of plays such as xx.♦ Dr. Blofeld 16:36, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
There are loads in Lowndes book but I've added a few of the more significant.— Rod talk 17:10, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality: 
B. MoS compliance: 
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources: 
B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary: 
C. No original research: 
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects: 
B. Focused: 
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias: 
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc: 
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales: 
B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions: 
Overall:
Pass or Fail: 
Good job.♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:26, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Theatre Royal, Bath. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121012015638/http://www.imagesofengland.org.uk/Details/Default.aspx?id=443496 to http://www.imagesofengland.org.uk/Details/Default.aspx?id=443496
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:35, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

This page should not be speedily deleted because... I was trying to remove the image of the front of the building from the top of the page, not delete the entire page. Please could someone advise how best to amend the image. Thank you  --Graemesavage14 (talk) 15:41, 10 September 2020 (UTC)