# Talk:Yellowtail flounder

This review is transcluded from Talk:Yellowtail flounder/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: RecycledPixels (talk · contribs) 07:31, 18 March 2022 (UTC)

I will review this article over the next couple of days.   I prefer to use the GA review table, which keeps me on task of evaluating just the GA criteria without getting lost in the weeds or bringing up MOS issues that aren't part of the criteria.  The table is just a personal preference, although I realize that it can make threaded comments and responses difficult.  Feel free to invent your own way of responding to my comments, whether it is in the table boxes in bold, italic, or colored text, or in a section immediately following the table.   Generally, I also add a section after the table of other suggestions and comments that I have.  Anything I mention outside the table in such a section is a suggestion only, and is not considered part of the pass/fail criteria of GA, so feel free to respond or disregard it if I make suggestions there.  I will begin the first part of the reviews shortly.  I usually take the review in several steps, and not normally in order.  Please don't respond or edit this GA review page or the article itself until I've completed item #7, the "overall assessment" field at the end, which is my sign that I have completed my steps, the ball is in your court, and I will wait for you to respond.  I will also ping you to let you know.  RecycledPixels (talk) 07:31, 18 March 2022 (UTC)


### Additional suggestions
Anything in this section is a suggestion for improvement and will not be considered part of the GA pass/fail criteria.

The article is inconsistent with its units of measure, in some cases using U.S. units with conversions to metric, and in others using metric units with conversion to U.S. units.  This is a MOS issue, but not one of the ones that are evaluated in the GA criteria.
Some of the conversions offer false precision, such as "weighing up to 2.2 pounds (1.00 kg)" should probably be something like "weighing up to about 2 pounds (1 kg)" and in other cases approximations have been converted into much more precise measurements, such as "they dwell on sandy or muddy seafloors at a depth between 100 and 350 feet (30 and 107 m)" should probably be "between 100 and 350 feet (30 and 100 m)"
@Eviolite: That's all I came up with, nicely written article.  Promoting.  RecycledPixels (talk) 21:28, 18 March 2022 (UTC)

@RecycledPixels: Thank you very much for the quick review, feedback, and promotion! I will work through the suggestions shortly. eviolite (talk) 21:46, 18 March 2022 (UTC)