# Talk:Trinity Episcopal Church (Washington, D.C.)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Trinity Episcopal Church (Washington, D.C.)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Zawed (talk · contribs) 23:57, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
I will review. Comments to follow in due course. Zawed (talk) 23:57, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for another review and take your time. APK whisper in my ear 09:00, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
Another article which is in good shape overall. Some comments:

Lead: ...the parish bought a nearby lot...: maybe word this to better reinforce to the reader that this is the site at the northeast corner of 3rd and C Streets NW, but without mentioning the actual address (that may be undue repetition). I was thinking along the lines of "the parish bought the lot with which the church is best associated..." or something to that effect.
New sanctuary: (1818-1895): date ranges should be separated by an endash, not a hyphen. That said, I don't think it necessary to include the date range anyway, no other named individual is treated this way and the reader can simply follow the link itself for dob/dod information.
New sanctuary: designing the new building.: suggest "to design the new building."
Later history: The Evening Star stated "an innovation in such structures will be a kitchen, thing whose...: there should be a cite at the end of this quote. Also, I think there may be a missing word. Should that be "...a kitch, something whose..."
Later history:  A renovation from 1897-1898: As above, endash instead of the hyphen for date ranges.
Demolition: The Washington Post reported "Many venerable ...: there should be a cite at the end of this quote.
Image tags check out OK.
That's it for me. Zawed (talk) 10:51, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

 Done APK whisper in my ear 00:17, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
This looks all good. I am passing this as GA as I believe that it meets the necessary criteria. Cheers, Zawed (talk) 10:25, 18 June 2022 (UTC)