# Talk:Zaziemskie światy

SirBrahms there is no proof of a source spot check here. IntentionallyDense (Contribs) 01:30, 3 February 2025 (UTC)

IntentionallyDense Hi! I don't know how to prove a source spot check. I just opened the source and checked it against what the article said. I'm still learning, so could you tell me how I'd prove that (for now and in the future). Sorry and regards, SirBrahms (talk) 15:41, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
That's good and what you are supposed to do. You just also need to mention the ones you checked, basically "I checked blah, blah... and blah", or I "checked all the sources". And the number of sources checked should be atleast 5-10% of the total refs, and spread throughout the article. Review looks good, btw, nice work. DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 19:02, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
Sounds good. You did great I just needed some statement saying you checked sources to approve your submission for the GAN backlog drive. IntentionallyDense (Contribs) 04:01, 4 February 2025 (UTC)
I see, thank you!  For the record, I checked sources two and eight. Regards, SirBrahms (talk) 17:44, 4 February 2025 (UTC)

Looking over this at the request of Piotrus. As I'm not formally reviewing this I will make some changes as I go, and leave notes here only when I'm unable to fix the issue as I see it. Vanamonde93 (talk) 19:02, 23 March 2025 (UTC)

I don't fully understand what "It was registered in documents on 11 August 1956" means. Perhaps simpler omitted, unless there is specific significance we can convey beyond being published on that date?
It would be nice to know who the analysts being quoted are; scholars, authors, reviewers, teachers?
I found myself wondering if the connections to the author's previous novel could be elaborated upon: this may be limited by the source material, of course.
Vanamonde93 (talk) 19:02, 23 March 2025 (UTC)