# Talk:The Archaeology of Ritual and Magic

This review is transcluded from Talk:The Archaeology of Ritual and Magic/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Maclean25 (talk · contribs) 21:51, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose):  b (MoS): 

It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 

It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 

It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 

It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 
Three images used: File:Archaeology of Ritual and Magic.jpg Fair use image of the book cover. File:Swinside (p4160146).jpg Commons-hosted cc-by-sa. File:Sator Square at Oppède.jpg Commons-hosted GNU cc-by-sa.
Overall:
Pass/Fail: 

I didn't realize until halfway through that I had already read this during its peer review. The article easily meets the GA criteria. If you would like a more detailed review or other perspectives, you can nominate this for Featured status. Otherwise, I look forward to seeing your next GA. maclean (talk) 04:15, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
As this is article about a book, I have placed it in the Literature section. maclean (talk) 04:22, 10 July 2012 (UTC)