# Talk:SMS Salamander (1861)

This review is transcluded from Talk:SMS Salamander/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk · contribs) 02:06, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
Will come back shortly. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 02:06, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

Section 1; para 1; There are many consistency errors in the the para and the infobox. Here goes the list:

Please correct these. And also mostly in many of other ship articles of Austia-Hungary (mostly done by you), used the displcament format as XXX tons (XXX long tons; XXX short tons). Please consider the same here.
Should all be fixed - another editor wrote up the design section and infobox, and their stuff is usually pretty squared away, so I didn't really look at it closely.
Section 2; sentence 1; Explain about Drache on its first mention i.e it is the sister ship, than in the later sentence.
Fixed
Section 2; sentence 2; Remove the dup-link of Drache
Done
Section 2; A comma (,) after "to protect Austria's coastline"
Added
Section 2; Link "Denmark"
Done
Section 2.1; para 3; sentence 1; "By this time, Re d'Italia had been rammed and sunk and the coastal defense ship Palestro was burning", the use of "and" is a bit confusing, revise.
Removed the "rammed and", which should hopefully clear it up a bit
Section 2.2; para 1; Remove thedup-link of Venice. First linked in para 1 of Section 2.1
Done
Consider adding the information about guns refitted around 1867 to the infobox.
Added
Consistency error between lead, prose, and infobox. The year for "broken-up", in the lead it is 1896, in prose (section 2.2) it is 1895–1896, and in infobox it is 1895. Please correct them.
Good catch, fixed.
Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 02:20, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
Thanks again! Parsecboy (talk) 13:07, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, spelling, and grammar):  b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): 

It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):  d (copyvio and plagiarism): 

It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 

It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 

It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 

Overall:
Pass/Fail: 

Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 00:29, 8 November 2016 (UTC)