# Talk:Snakehead (Fringe)

Is that a picture of a worm, or worms, erupting from a man's face? Green Cardamom (talk) 03:47, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

Yes. It is a giant parasitic worm erupting from a man's mouth. Gross, I know, but then hey, it is Fringe after all. :) Ruby2010 comment! 04:26, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
Sorry, more clear, is it a singular worm with many, er, appendages, or multiple worms crowded together? Green Cardamom (talk) 00:35, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
Sorry for the confusion. It is a singular worm that possesses many tentacles (a little difficult, I realize, to imagine fully using just the image). Each victim in the episode in infected with only one, rather large parasite. Hope that helps! P.S. I encourage you to watch the series. It's probably the best drama on network television currently (if you're in the US). Thanks, Ruby2010 comment! 01:04, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Snakehead (Fringe)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Queenieacoustic (talk) 13:43, 23 June 2011 (UTC)


### Comments
#### Plot
"Seasickness" should not be in quotes.
"In the lab, Walter (John Noble) posits they are gigantic parasitic worms," Replace "they" with "the creatures" or something similar.
"They discover a Triad gang member and ties to several shell companies the gang has set up in the U.S." To eliminate confusion, replace "they" with who that are being mentioned (the Fringe team?).


#### Production
Nothing here.


#### Reception
##### Ratings
Nothing here.


##### Reviews
"Critical reception to the episode was generally negative." Replace "to" with "for".
"AOL TV's Jane Boursaw believed the worms 'seriously freaky'" Add "were" after "worms".
Ref 12 links to Kuro5hin, a website which uses user-generated articles as its contents. Unfortunately, per point 2b of the good article criteria, sites like the one used are not considered reliable, and should never be used on Wikipedia.


#### Lead
Nothing here.


### In conclusion
As usual, a fine article that is close to GA. I'll put it on hold for seven days so that you can make the necessary fixes. Good luck!

I replaced the Kuro5hin ref with 2 better ones, and made your other suggested changes. Thanks very much for the review! :) Ruby2010 comment! 15:13, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
Nice work! Passed. Queenieacoustic (talk) 16:45, 23 June 2011 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Snakehead (Fringe). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110514053947/http://www.fox.com/fringe/recaps/season-2/episode-9/ to http://www.fox.com/fringe/recaps/season-2/episode-9/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:48, 12 May 2017 (UTC)