# Talk:Ímar

This review is transcluded from Talk:Ímar/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: TheMagikCow (talk · contribs) 14:43, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
 Review 
A good article is—
Well-written:
the prose is clear and concise, it respects copyright laws, and the spelling and grammar are correct; and  
it complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation   
Verifiable with no original research:
it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline; 
all in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines; and  
it contains no original research.  
Broad in its coverage:
it addresses the main aspects of the topic; and 
it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). 
Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without bias, giving due weight to each. 
Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute .
Illustrated, if possible, by images: –
images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content; and 
images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. 
Overall