# Talk:Operation Bertram


### Additional source material by Richardson
There is a significant quantity of material that could be used to extend this article, in Richardson's autobiography "Flashback". 141.0.39.82 (talk) 20:23, 7 November 2012 (UTC)

Thanks. Will have a look at it. Chiswick Chap (talk) 21:42, 7 November 2012 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Operation Bertram/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Sven Manguard (talk · contribs) 02:42, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
GAN Quicksheet 1.23 SM
(Criteria)

Starting comments: Looks interesting.

1. Well written:  Section acceptable

a. prose/copyright: I moved a section around, because it felt out of place where it was. Other than that, it was fine.  Acceptable
b. MoS compliance:  Acceptable
2. Accurate and verifiable:  Section acceptable

a. provides references: Obviously I'm assuming good faith on the printed materials. Dazzled and Deceived: Mimicry and Camouflage sounds like a fascinating read (just from the title) but I don't have any of the books.  Acceptable
b. proper citation use:  Acceptable
c. no original research:  Acceptable
3. Broad in coverage:  Section acceptable

a. covers main aspects: 
b. focused/on topic: 
4. Neutral: 
5. Stable: 
6. Image use:  Section acceptable

a. license/tagging correct: Always nice to see properly done FURs. Saves me the time of fixing them. 
b. relevant/properly captioned: 
7. Additional items not required for a GA, but requested by the reviewer:

a. images that should have alt texts have them:  Needs work Please consider doing this, as it does have a big impact on accessibility. Done.
b. general catch all and aesthetics: Meh. I don't really love the image placement, some things butt into sections they shouldn't, but it's nothing major.
Comments after the initial review: Was interesting. Little piece of history I never knew about. Solid piece of work, I'm happy to promote this. Sven Manguard Wha? 03:26, 6 January 2013 (UTC)