# Talk:Thomas Lound

This review is transcluded from Talk:Thomas Lound/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: The Rambling Man (talk · contribs) 17:47, 2 September 2021 (UTC)

Comments

"painter John Thirtle. He was popular" Lound or Thirtle?
"watercolourists" can we link?
"landscapist David Cox. His etchings" whose?  Cox or Lound?
British Newspaper Archive links should be marked as via=British Newspaper Archive.
"the Artists' Conversaziones in the" what was that?
"his life. died" something awry here.
", whose influence" maybe "although his" in the context of this sentence?
"He became an accomplished" Lound became..
"prolific watercolourist" link that here too as well as in the lead.
"working life.[22][14] He" ref order.
"c.1832" space between c. and year.
"c.1850" ditto.
"Lound (1802-1861)." en-dash for year range.
"1802-1861: etchings" likewise.
Eight external links?  Is there anything in those which could be added in via inline referencing?
Is there a good subcat of Category:Watercolorists which could be usefully added?
That's it, nice article. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 09:25, 3 September 2021 (UTC)

@The Rambling Man: All the above comments have been addressed and hopefully sorted, but it's worth pointing out that Wikipedia:Nominating_good_articles#External_links says WP:EL isn't within the GA criteria. I've removed those external links that added little to the article. Amitchell125 (talk) 11:38, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
Sure, there's a whole lot not in the GA criteria, a lot of what I do is to give good advice which often extends beyond GA criteria, but I don't enforce it.  Thanks for taking it into consideration.  Good to go. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 11:54, 3 September 2021 (UTC)