# Talk:The Magical Worlds of Harry Potter

This review is transcluded from Talk:The Magical Worlds of Harry Potter/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: The Flash {talk} 02:55, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
Hiya. I caught this quaint little article while sifting through GAN, and it's a sure-fire pass for GA. I'll be conducting the review in the manner of Talk:I Married Marge/GA1. Let's start. :) The Flash {talk} 02:55, 2 January 2010 (UTC)


### Lead
Short but to the point—nice.


### Content
"Colbert explains in the introduction of his book[...]" → "[...]of the book[...]" as to not confuse readers that you're talking about a different book.
 Done Theleftorium 11:49, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
There's some times where it strays from "he explains" to "he commented," so please pick one tense to stick with.
 Done Theleftorium 11:49, 2 January 2010 (UTC)


### Background
Please explain that his nephew and nieces are children before you refer to them as "the children."
 Done Theleftorium 11:49, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
Wikilink to Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone.
 Done Theleftorium 11:49, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
Perhaps change "[...]began to notice mythology references in the book" to "[...]notice mythological references[...]"
 Done Theleftorium 11:49, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
Can you merge the second and third sentences in the last paragraph?
 Done Theleftorium 11:49, 2 January 2010 (UTC)


### Publication and reception
Same as above—work with fixing tenses to be consistent.
 Not done What parts are you referring to? Theleftorium 11:49, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
Never mind, after another read, the issues I had with that are to minor to count. The Flash {talk} 17:27, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
"The Magical Worlds of Harry Potter has been praised for learning children about literature and history" → "[...]praised for teaching children[...]"
 Done Theleftorium 11:49, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
Please give a brief explanation about the Narnia book, like what you said about the Lord of the Rings one.
 Done Theleftorium 11:49, 2 January 2010 (UTC)


### Images
Can you add one of these images? From what I can tell, book FU images are like those of films and video games: infobox images are perfectly fine to use for identification purposes.
I don't feel an infobox image is useful here. Theleftorium 17:35, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
Any particular reason, though? The Flash {talk} 18:31, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
I just don't see why we should use a non-free image in this article when it's not useful. Theleftorium 18:46, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
It is useful—identification purposes. The Flash {talk} 19:52, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
People can identify the book by reading the text, IMO. Theleftorium 19:55, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
The people at WP:NFC seemed okay with it so I've added the cover art. I can't come up with any ALT text for it so feel free to do that yourself if you think it's necessary for GA. Theleftorium 21:12, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
Alright, thanks; I've added ALT text for you. The Flash {talk} 03:21, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
Both images are fine—but can you please add some ALT text?
 Done Theleftorium 11:49, 2 January 2010 (UTC)


### Final say
To be done when above issues are taken care of.
GA review (see here for criteria)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose):  b (MoS): 

It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 

It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 

It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 

It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 

Overall:
Pass/Fail: 
Nice work! I'm going ahead and passing it. Thanks for your diligence throughout. :) The Flash {talk} 03:25, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
Thank you very much for the review! :) Theleftorium 10:52, 3 January 2010 (UTC)