# Talk:Utah State Route 101

Complete, needs history is limited, B-Class. ~~ This page was edited by ĈĠ 20:48, 4 October 2008 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Utah State Route 101/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
GA review (see here for criteria)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose):  b (MoS): 
Some minor MOS breaches with missing non-breaking spaces between numbers and units in measurements that were just fixed.
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 

It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 

It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars etc.: 

It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 
A photo would be nice, but not required. The same goes for a map.
Overall:
Pass/Fail: 
The paragraph in the History section on the car accident isn't really needed, IMHO. You might want to remove since it isn't very notable. Imzadi1979 (talk) 22:46, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

This article has failed the USRD GA audit and will be sent to WP:GAR if the issues are not resolved within one week. Please see WT:USRD for more details, and please ask me if you have any questions as to why this article failed. --Rschen7754 (T C) 07:14, 5 April 2009 (UTC)