# Talk:The Inbetweeners 2

First of all. It is over long. And per WP:FILMPLOT, it should be between 400 and 700 words.
And since when did Wikipedia ever show images in the plot from the film itself? They aren't even neatly put in, and it looks a little messy. 
I think they should all go, or just two of them. But the plot needs to cut down. If anyone wants to do so, feel free to. Or I will myself Charlr6 (talk) 17:38, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

I removed the images per policy and removed jokey trivial bits in the plot. A bit more to do though! '''tAD''' (talk) 18:09, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:The Inbetweeners 2/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Zwerg Nase (talk · contribs) 20:50, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

Oh well, someone needs to do this, I guess ;) I hope to be able to review it this weekend. Zwerg Nase (talk) 20:50, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose):  b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): 

It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 

It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 

It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 

It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 

Overall:
Pass/Fail: 

Everything that bothered me, I took care of myself. So it's a pass. Congratulations! :) Zwerg Nase (talk) 08:06, 20 May 2015 (UTC)