# Talk:Woodspring Priory

This review is transcluded from Talk:Woodspring Priory/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 19:56, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

Will have this one to you within 24 hours. At a first glance, the article looks comprehensive and well-written so the review shouldn't be long. ☠ Jaguar ☠ 19:56, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors: 

B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists: 

Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. Has an appropriate reference section: 

B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary: 

C. No original research: 

Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects: 

B. Focused: 

Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias: 

Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc: 

Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content: 

B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions: 

Overall:
Pass or Fail: 


### Initial comments
#### Lead
The lead summarises the article well and meets the GA criteria and WP:LEAD. I would have suggested to change the opening sentence so that it reads out where Woodspring Priory is located, for example Woodspring Priory (originally Worsprynge or Worspring) is a former Augustinian priory situated in North Somerset or something similar to that. But the lead is fine.


#### History
Some parts of this section feel too trivial, however it won't affect the GAN. I noticed one for example "Major and Mrs Hill continued to own the priory until 1928" - how about something like "The Major and his wife"?
However the history section is informative, in depth and mostly well-written so this meets the GA criteria.


#### References
The first reference appears to be broken
https://www.britishnewspaperarchive.co.uk/account/subscribe?nextpage=%2Fviewer%2Fbl%2F0000221%2F18970121%2F030%2F0003&gift=false Ref 18] and ref 19 appear to go nowhere as well


### Close - promoted
Despite some sentences in the article feeling trivial and a couple of references that lead to nowhere - I think that this article already meets the GA criteria. It is broad in coverage, mostly well-written and well referenced. Because the concerns I have listed aren't really that important I feel it won't be necessary to put this on hold, so I'll promote this one! Well done on another Somerset GA! ☠ Jaguar ☠ 11:46, 23 August 2014 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Woodspring Priory. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140718155544/http://www.landmarktrust.org.uk/our-landmarks/properties/woodspring-priory-13260/ to http://www.landmarktrust.org.uk/our-landmarks/properties/woodspring-priory-13260/
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140718155544/http://www.landmarktrust.org.uk/our-landmarks/properties/woodspring-priory-13260/ to http://www.landmarktrust.org.uk/our-landmarks/properties/woodspring-priory-13260/
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140528080146/http://www.bobkingsley.co.uk/blog/?p=110 to http://www.bobkingsley.co.uk/blog/?p=110
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140718155544/http://www.landmarktrust.org.uk/our-landmarks/properties/woodspring-priory-13260/ to http://www.landmarktrust.org.uk/our-landmarks/properties/woodspring-priory-13260/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:43, 20 May 2017 (UTC)