# Talk:Schulze Baking Company Plant

The NR nomination form has some good info: [1], its linked on that page, I will see what I can do here in the next few days. --IvoShandor (talk) 20:07, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

What is known about this source?--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM)  00:08, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

Clearly not reliable, but I think you could include it in good faith. Clearly it's useful and it makes the encyclopedia better. Thanks for fixing my fix. That section was confusing. ChildofMidnight (talk) 02:53, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality: 

B. MoS compliance: 

Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources: 

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary: 

C. No original research: 

Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects: 

B. Focused: 

Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias: 

Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc: 

Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales: 

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions: 

Overall:
Pass or Fail: 

Re this edit: don't link to dab pages.  If you don't want the redlink because the article is not expected, unlink it entirely. -- JHunterJ (talk) 23:36, 10 March 2009 (UTC)