# Talk:Siegfried Huneck

This review is transcluded from Talk:Siegfried Huneck/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: AryKun (talk · contribs) 07:19, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

Okay, pretty solid article overall, but I have a few comments. Suggestions for rewording are optional, while those based on MOS should generally be implemented.
The lead shouldn't have any citations, especially since all the info seem to already be cited in the body.
Removed citation. Esculenta (talk) 16:06, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
9 September 1928 – 9 October 2011 → 9 September, 1928 – 9 October, 2011 per MOS:DATECOMMA
Not quite; as explained in the link, that comma style only applies to month–day–year format. The applicable policy here is MOS:BIRTHDATE. Esculenta (talk) 16:06, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
All the German words and phrases in the article need lang templates.
Added lang templates to phrases and titles. I don't think it's needed for individual words that use the same characters as English. Esculenta (talk) 16:06, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
"primary school here" → "primary school there"
Done. Esculenta (talk) 16:06, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
"delay because of" →  "delay caused by"
Done. Esculenta (talk) 16:06, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
"study chemistry University of Jena" → "study chemistry at the University of Jena"
Done. Esculenta (talk) 16:06, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
"time, so no" → "time and so no"
Done. Esculenta (talk) 16:06, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
"on the chemistry of amino-derivatives of pentacyclic triterpenes" → "on the chemistry of amino-derivatives of pentacyclic triterpenes"
Triterpene was linked previously, but linked the other. Esculenta (talk) 16:06, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
Liverwort is duplinked.
Fixed. Esculenta (talk) 16:06, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
"retirement, in 1995 Huneck" → "retirement, in 1995, Huneck"
Comma moved. Esculenta (talk) 16:06, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
Are the binominal authorities for the species named after him necessary? They don't seem particularly relevant.
Perhaps not to everyone, but they instantly answer the question "who named species after this person?" without having to click further. Esculenta (talk) 16:06, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
Perhaps add a photo of one of the species named after him, as otherwise the article entirely lacks images.
Couldn't find any free images of these species for use (Opegrapha huneckii doesn't really count as it's a junior synonym). However, I did add a fair-use image of him. Esculenta (talk) 16:06, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
On what basis were the publications mentioned chosen?
My criteria were sort of a combination of "not too short", "representative of his life work", "has been discussed/mentioned as an important work of his in his obituary", but I'm open to suggestions for adding/removing. Esculenta (talk) 16:06, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
Refs are consistently formatted and reliable.
A couple searches of random phrases from teh article turned up nothing except for Wikipedia and mirrors, so copyvio seems good. AryKun (talk) 10:35, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
Thanks for reviewing, AryKun. Here's a diff of the changes made. Esculenta (talk)
Okay, passes the criteria now. AryKun (talk) 06:01, 13 May 2022 (UTC)