# Talk:Peace (law)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Peace (law)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: TheMagikCow (talk · contribs) 16:32, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
Happy to take a look at this. TheMagikCow (T) (C) 16:32, 16 June 2019 (UTC)


### Criteria
### Review
Well-written:

Verifiable with no original research:

Broad in its coverage:

Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.

Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.

Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:


#### Result
#### Discussion
TheMagikCow, thank you for all this. I've made some edits/additions to the article. Neutralitytalk 19:48, 16 June 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for these edits - they are great. The article is looking in much better shape. TheMagikCow (T) (C) 10:08, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
There is some useful information at Breach of the peace that might be useful in the American Section - content in the first paragraph in the section entitled "England, Wales and Northern Ireland". There is also some great information & sources on breach of the peace there too. TheMagikCow (T) (C) 16:31, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
I have made some significant additions. Neutralitytalk 18:21, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
Thanks so much for all of your work with this article - it is fantastic and well on the way to FA status if you were so inclined to go down that route. TheMagikCow (T) (C) 09:46, 25 June 2019 (UTC)