# Talk:Raghunath Temple

This review is transcluded from Talk:Raghunath Temple/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Royroydeb (talk · contribs) 17:27, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

The lead is not only short but also very mediocre.
Expanded
In the location section, please mention Jammu and Kashmir state as well as link Jammu city.
Done
Isn't it "Architecture" and not "Features"?
In most temple articles “Features” is the title generally used as it deals with other details of the temple, in addition to the type of architecture.
I think the Religious School section should be included in the history, because it is a part of the history of the temple. You can keep it separate by keeping it in the 3rd heading. Just a suggestion, I would like to hear your comments about this.
A separate section would be in order. As you have mentioned it, I have now shifted it to the History section with a 3rd heading.
Please link Ranjit Singh, and mention him as the founder of the Sarbat Khalsa or the Sikh empire.
There is spelling error here. I have changed it to Ranbir Singh. Ranjit Singh was not involved with this temple.
Was the translation centre during Ranjit Singh's rule?
It was during Ranbir Singh’s time and not Ranjit Singh. I have corrected the spelling mistake
Which Maharaja?
Yes, Maharaja Ranbir Singh. Name mentioned now.
Can you expand the terrorist attacks? I mean who did it.
I kept the text here to the minimum as the attacks were incidental. Fidayeen (suicide bombers) is already mentioned in the article that it was by Fidayeen (suicide bombers). However, I have now added Laskar-e-Toiba.
RRD13 দেবজ্যোতি (talk) 17:27, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

@Royroydeb: Thanks for the review. I have complied with all your review observations.--Nvvchar. 07:39, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
@Nvvchar:, the last thing which needs to be done is to mention who is Ranbir Singh, I mean of which dynasty he belongs. RRD13 দেবজ্যোতি (talk) 08:27, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
@Royroydeb: Ranbir Singh belonged to the Jamwal Rajput clan, which is now mentioned in the lead.
@Royroydeb:.Will you please leave a message on my talk page on this article making it to GA.--Nvvchar. 11:42, 23 March 2015 (UTC)