# Talk:Sixteenth Street Historic District

This review is transcluded from Talk:Sixteenth Street Historic District/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Gerald Waldo Luis (talk · contribs) 10:49, 14 November 2020 (UTC)


### Before beginning
Hello there, and welcome to the GA review page of Sixteenth Street Historic District. Remember to keep civil and assume good faith amongst each other. I will give my assessment on whether this article meets GA criteria and, if not, how it can; if you have one feel free to express it. 


### Quick fail detector
An article failed immediately as a GA if:

It is a long way from meeting any one of the six good article criteria — Nope.
It contains copyright violations — All content in the article is mostly original; no copyright violated.
It has, or needs, cleanup banners that are unquestionably still valid — There is none.
It is not stable due to edit warring on the page — There are no recent edit wars.
A reviewer who ha— Nope.
In conclusion, this article can be a GA. GeraldWL 11:18, 14 November 2020 (UTC)


### Consistency
Since the subject is American, and dates in this article uses mdy, I believe it should be consistent. GeraldWL 11:18, 14 November 2020 (UTC)


### Lead
The lead is fine. Although there are many over-detailed stuff in it that can be trimmed/simplified. For example, the last sentence can be shortened to "Many notable architects have their works represented in the district, too." GeraldWL 06:59, 15 November 2020 (UTC)


### Sources
All sources are reliable; no statements are original researches. I see, though, that many sentences are followed by excessive citations. Maybe move the citations to the claims needing it?


### Broad and focus
This article stayed focus on the main topic and not deviating to off topics.


### Neutrality and stability
The article is not biased, and there are no edit wars.


### Prose
"Architectural historian Laura V. Trieschmann describing the significance of 16th Street." Maybe "Regarding the significance of 16th Street, architectural historian Laura V. Trieschmann says"?
Other than that, the prose is good and complied with GAC.


### MOS
All good here. The manual of style necessary for GA is complied. GeraldWL 10:52, 16 November 2020 (UTC)


### Overall
I consider this good stuff.  Passed