# Talk:Qianling Mausoleum

I just created this article; shout out and much thanks to User:Nlu for improving the article, providing links, Chinese characters, citations, etc. To everyone else, be bold, edit and expand, or make it known here what you want to add. Please come armed with scholarly sources, though.--Pericles of AthensTalk 05:37, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
Question: Is it known why those statues of the ambassadors are all headless? It seems like a deliberate act. --Delft 253 11:15, 2 July 2013 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Well done on this article.
Record of edits:

"there was found" -> "there were found" ("Tombs" section, correcting plural tense)
"halls Li Xián's" -> "halls of Li Xián's" ("Murals" section, adding missing word)
"there is only six" -> "there are only six" ("Murals" section, correcting plural tense)
Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality: 
"...real fully-stone doors..." I'm not quite sure what to make of that. Not having a background in Chinese Architecture, it almost seems to imply that the Chinese were using Sheetrock in the 8th century, which of course is complete nonsense. I assume it means that past tombs has been made to look like stone, but were actually wood or something, however this could probably be clarified in the article a bit.
Someone needs to watch their grammar when dealing with plural subjects - I caught a few above, but it's possible I may have missed some.
B. MoS compliance: 
Lead section provides a good summary for the article.
I'm putting this here as I'm not sure where else it would fit - It seems as through there are only a bare minimum of Chinese Characters used in the article. I know there are conflicting methods of romanizing names, and inclusion of the actual name in Chinese could be helpful for one with a background in that language. This is done elsewhere for those people with articles, I know, but a few don't have them, such as General Li Jinxing in the "History" section. Likewise, other terms could benefit from the Chinese translation (i.e., peizang mu, lead section)
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources: 
Nice work with the Harvard references.
B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary: 
Perhaps a few less references than there are for many GA's, but they are well used throughout. A subject such as this isn't likely to have too many sources of information anyway, I suppose.
C. No original research: 

Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects: 

B. Focused: 
Were this to be expanded, I'd recommend making "Spirit Path," "Tombs," and "Murals" all subsections of a larger "Appearance" section or something. It seems like you have plenty of information to provide descriptions and interpretations of the layout, which can be handled in more detail. To balance this, the history section could be expanded as well, perhaps with a brief overview of how tombs were used in past dynasties.
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias: 

Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc: 

Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales: 

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions: 

Overall:
Pass or Fail: 
Well done. This passes a GA review, however I definitely think this could be expanded at least to a good A-class. Send this over to peer review for some more suggestions and keep up the good work! Hersfold (t/a/c) 12:18, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
Great! I think you've given a fair assessment of the article.--Pericles of AthensTalk 17:21, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Han Yang Ling Mausoleum which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RMCD bot 21:01, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Qianling Mausoleum. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20050504062830/http://www.sxhm.com:80/e_Products3.asp?SignID=70 to http://www.sxhm.com/e_Products3.asp?SignID=70
Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20080610043826/http://www.chinavtour.com:80/gallery/main.php/v/Xian-photos/qianling/ to http://www.chinavtour.com/gallery/main.php/v/Xian-photos/qianling/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:25, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

I see the term Left Guard in this article. A bit of searching on Google Books leads me to believe that it refers to the Yü Lin Dragon Martial Guard. Is that correct? I know very little about this topic. --Slashme (talk) 09:46, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

To add to this article: the possible reasons why Wu Zetian's stele has no inscriptions. 98.123.38.211 (talk) 17:02, 25 August 2024 (UTC)