# Talk:SM UB-4

Only at the end did I deduce that this article is about a submarine. Could the opening sentence be improved for the benefit of non-experts? Hovea 15:35, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:SM UB-4/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
GA review (see here for criteria)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose):  b (MoS): 

It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 

It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 

It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars etc.: 

It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 

Overall:
Pass/Fail: 
All good. Arsenikk (talk) 10:23, 10 March 2009 (UTC)