# Talk:Trap Back

This review is transcluded from Talk:Trap Back/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Morgan695 (talk · contribs) 20:00, 14 October 2019 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
I made a few edits of some overly superlative language, but this is otherwise a well-written and well-researched article that I'm happy to pass.
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, spelling, and grammar):  b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): 

It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):  d (copyvio and plagiarism): 
A few pings on Earwigs, they were from quotations and long lists of criminal charges.
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 

It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 

Overall:
Pass/Fail: 
In general, a quality article that just needed minor tweaks. Morgan695 (talk) 20:00, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Thank you Morgan695! All your changes in wording were clear improvements. Grateful for your keen attention to detail and feedback. —BLZ · talk 21:37, 14 October 2019 (UTC)