# Talk:The Naked Now

The trivia fact concerning Riker being called "Bill" is not entirely accurate; in "Tin Man" (TNG 3x20) Tam refers to Riker as "Billy boy".

This article has way too much detail. CovenantD 22:07, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

Meh. That's what you get when there's 5 hours of TNG on every weekday between SpikeTV and G4. Naked Now comes up on rotation every couple of months. Wl219 22:41, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

Why is the Oberth-class startship called the SS Tsiolkovsky instead of USS Tsiolkovsky? --BigMac1212 (talk) 02:54, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

Thats what it's called in the script: [1]. Traditionally, "S.S." refers to civilian-owned ships, so maybe it wasn't owned by the Federation? Although the "clothed" crew had Federation uniforms on, so who knows? It's just a TV show. Cyberia23 (talk) 04:00, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

I think this part, which is part of the lead now, needs to be put on its own page (if the band is notable), and a disambiguation page needs to be constructed. Since I don't really know how to do that, it would be great if somebody more knowledgeable than me got around to doing it :-)

"The Naked Now" is also a pop/rock band whose members hail from Boston, MA and London, UK. The band was active on and off from 1988 until 2002 and was fronted by singer Adam Glass.
--89.244.117.182 (talk) 22:31, 8 October 2009 (UTC)

The only time in the series Will Riker is ever referred to as "Bill" is during this episode. 2602:306:317C:6830:CCB1:F30B:DEB7:9E08 (talk) 21:40, 11 July 2015 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:The Naked Now/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Midnightblueowl (talk · contribs) 18:21, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
Right, I'm happy to give this one a go. Midnightblueowl (talk) 18:21, 2 February 2013 (UTC)


### Checklist
I've made the amendments as suggested, and given the plot section a copyedit. Miyagawa (talk) 22:10, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
I can still see quite a few prose errors and other issues with the text. I shall go through and make the necessary changes; I hope that you don't mind. Midnightblueowl (talk) 19:21, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
Generally, this is a pretty well researched and put together article Miyagawa, but there are far too many prose problems and other areas where it strays far away from the Wikipedia MOS. I see that you have put up quite a few other articles on Star Trek episodes for GA review over at the nominations page, but may I suggest that you put them up for peer review first ? That way, many of these prose problems can be ironed out prior to the GA review stage. I don't mean to discourage you at all however, because – and I must reiterate it – you are doing some great work assembling these articles, but there are quite a few problems here that I would personally see dealt with elsewhere. No obligation though, as you know. Midnightblueowl (talk) 20:12, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

Could you please clarify "and in fact would have enjoyed seeing a similar episode a few seasons into Star Trek: Voyager" for me please ? Midnightblueowl (talk) 20:14, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
The reviewer thought that the episode would have been better served appearing several seasons into Voyager, as it would have revealed some interesting information about the characters. The reference makes the point that it would have resolved some character issues a great deal quicker than the way they were eventually written. (If I remember correctly, that would include the Torres/Paris relationship). Miyagawa (talk) 21:16, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for the clarification. I think this can pass GA review now. Midnightblueowl (talk) 17:10, 6 February 2013 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on The Naked Now. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://archive.is/20130216225003/http://www.tower.com/star-trek-next-generation-episode-3-patrick-stewart-vhs/wapi/109139362 to http://www.tower.com/star-trek-next-generation-episode-3-patrick-stewart-vhs/wapi/109139362
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:19, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

The similarity of Data falling over on the ship's bridge behind Worf, and a similar action in the BBC series Only Fools And Horses (episode: Yuppy Love, Del Boy bar scene) brings me to ask: were the writers inspired by this comic action? 77.166.24.100 (talk) 16:41, 19 February 2023 (UTC)