# Talk:Tina Strobos

This page is almost entirely copped from the fresh New York Times article, yet the article is cited only once, for a quote. Either the article should be cited more effectively, or preferably, the article should be rewritten with more information and more sources. At the very least, the sentences copied directly from the NYTimes should be reworded---forget the outright copying, this article doesn't even flow well. Horrible read.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.46.38.89 (talk) 23:28, 17 October 2009 (UTC) 

This review is transcluded from Talk:Tina Strobos/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Carabinieri (talk · contribs) 21:29, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
Hi, great work on this article. It is well-written, referenced, apparently comprehensive, neutral, stable, and illustrated. I'm going to go ahead and pass this. I've done a little copyediting, but feel free to revert anything you disagree with (I switched all the spelling to American English, since it contained some British and some American spellings). Just two comments: The article uses a primary source, the interview, quite a bit, possibly more than WP:RSPRIMARY and WP:PRIMARY would recommend. The "Strobos' maternal grandmother..." paragraph doesn't really seem to deal with Strobos, but I can see why you wanted to include this information. I don't think either of these things should stand in the way of this being listed as a GA. Thanks for this interesting article.--Carabinieri (talk) 02:44, 19 June 2018 (UTC)