# Talk:Wario Land: Shake It – Amazing Footage!

This review is transcluded from Talk:Marketing for Wario Land: Shake It!/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Alexandra IDV (talk · contribs) 10:49, 29 May 2020 (UTC)

I'll review this, expect comments within a few days.--AlexandraIDV 10:49, 29 May 2020 (UTC)

Infobox and lead
What's the reason for putting Goodby and Silverstein on the same row in the infobox but everyone else on their own?
When I first read this article, I did not realize what "It was later replaced by..." meant until getting to that part in the article body. I think being clear and saying something like "It was later taken down and replaced by" might be good.
Video
"Viewers can pick up elements" - if the ad is no longer available as an interactive thing, then this should be in past tense
Are there any sources you can cite for this section, considering the ad no longer exists in its interactive form (and thus can't really be used as a source for this)
Reception
This is one long paragraph - readability would be helped a lot by splitting it into two.
"acros" should be "across"
Images
The non-free use rationale calls the screenshot "cover art".
Other comments
Although not strictly necessary to meet the GA criteria, I would strongly suggest adding alt text to the image for accessibility reasons.
Does an official non-interactive video upload of this exist? If so, it would be helpful to add an external link to it.
Notes sections typically go before references, as footnotes (even if that is not the case here) themselves may contain references.
Not a lot of problems with this one! I'll put the review on hold for seven days - @ me when you have addressed the issues above, or if you have any questions.--AlexandraIDV 14:51, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

All issues addressed. c: - Bryn (talk) (contributions) 15:05, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
Thank you! I will promote the article to GA now~!--AlexandraIDV 15:15, 1 June 2020 (UTC)


### Wario Land: Shake It — Amazing Footage!
I've listed this article for peer review because I'm hoping to potentially get it to Featured article status - or, failing that, merely get it to as good as it possibly can be. Mainly looking for prose suggestions and structural improvements.
Thanks, Cukie Gherkin (talk) 19:47, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

I was honestly not expecting a topic like this to be an potential FAC. I think it's a great article, but it may be a deadend to "exemplify Wikipedia's very best work".  TzarN64 (talk) 03:09, 1 May 2025 (UTC)
You should see How Brown Saw the Baseball Game. Tarlby (t) (c) 17:07, 1 May 2025 (UTC)
Wow, that’s a very very short featured article that I was not expecting. That gives me a lot more confidence that this Wario advertisement could potentially be a featured article one day. TzarN64 (talk) 18:22, 1 May 2025 (UTC)