# Talk:St Eugrad's Church, Llaneugrad

This review is transcluded from Talk:St Eugrad's Church, Llaneugrad/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Jimfbleak (talk · contribs) 14:48, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
Just putting down a marker for now, review to follow soon Jimfbleak -  talk to me? 14:48, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

Any chance of a stub for the saint?
I think it's good practice to link less common words like "nave" and "chancel" either at the first occurrence only, or once in the lead and once in the body.
link "vestry", "trefoil" "Art Nouveau" font (:
More tomorrow

Thanks for stopping by (again) - one of these days I ought to read Blakeney in detail and comment more fully at FAC.
A stub-ette might have to wait for a few days, quite a hectic week or so at work (plus half-term with the kids)
I'll check, but that was my aim too - might have missed a first mention in the body, or relinked, through writing different sections at different stages and/or moving chunks around as the whim took me.
Will link those, particularly Font of course... early night tonight though so not now. BencherliteTalk 21:33, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
Now added the links for your points 2 and 3. BencherliteTalk 14:46, 19 October 2011 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose):  b (MoS): 
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 
It is stable.
No edit wars etc.: 
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 
Overall:
Pass/Fail: