# Talk:Viewtiful Joe (video game)

Regarding my edit: only the Japanese release of the PlayStation 2 version is subtitled "A New Hope".  Not the others.
--138.238.96.101 03:06, 18 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Hey wern't the camera options supposted to make fun of Masked Rider as is the rest, not the Matrix?

I thought they were making fun of just generic action movie special effects cliches in general. CaptainSpam actually remembered to sign it this time 20:43, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)

While it isn't exactly important, you CAN use both Slow Mo and Mach Speed at the same time.  It acts as a normal Slow Mo mode, but Joe (et al) runs a bit faster than normal.  But, it's kinda not noteable unless someone else wants to throw it in. CaptainSpam actually remembered to sign it this time 20:43, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Slow+Mach is useful for running across the ground to hit more enemies while still in Rock-On.  So I'd say it's viable. Not to mention the fact that the extra boost of speed can be great for dodging purposes.

Bit of a conflict going on - the page says Dee Bradley Baker as playing Joe, but another page lists Jason Marsden.
Is the one with Jason Marsden for Joe in the game or the anime?  Unlike the Japanese dub of the anime, none of the original English cast were asked to return for the anime, possibly because of several changes that were made due to "suggestiveness." Dracokanji 13:25, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
It says here that Dante can one-hit kill Fire Leo and while this is copy+pasted on MANY sites, I don't see any factual information regarding Dante's ability to do this.  His stinger move is the most powerful move in the game hands down, but can it one-hit kill Fire Leo?  Anyone have any information regarding this?

The Viewtiful Joe pages, though well-written for the most part, are a little messy.  There is a bit of misspelling and grammer that should be fixed, and considering the number of pages, there should be a VJ quick links section at the bottom of the pages, like the Zelda sections.  If anyone supports this, let me know and we can start getting this worked out. Dracokanji 13:22, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

"Notably, Viewtiful Joe was one of the first games to use what is referred to in the game industry as 2.5D (as opposed to 2D or 3D). Though sprites are 2D, the levels themselves are 3D for an enhanced graphical look, though the game still plays like a 2D sidescroller game."
One of the first? Is this actually true? Doesn't Tomba for example count as a 2.5D game?AceWhatever 15:19, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
I believe Pandemonium was actually the first "2.5D" game. That appeared on Playstation in 1996, followed by Tomba and Klonoa: Door To Phantomile in 1997. This definitely needs editing or removing. TheCodfather 07:04, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Viewtiful Joe/GA1

Comment:The article is mostly good, but there's a dab link and two references are dead. GamerPro64 (talk) 20:26, 30 January 2010 (UTC)

I've fixed the reference links. Which link is a dab? ~ Hibana (talk) 21:16, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
The Bionic Commando link. GamerPro64 (talk) 21:33, 30 January 2010 (UTC)

The Bionic Commando link is part of the Capcom franchises template at the bottom. If I changed that link, it would change it for all articles using the template. How would I go about fixing that? ~  Hibana (talk) 01:48, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
I took care of the dab and I am now giving my Support. GamerPro64 (talk) 05:31, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
Also supporting - promoting to A-Class --Teancum (talk) 14:47, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Viewtiful Joe. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090208093503/http://gamechoiceawards.com:80/archive/gdca_4th.htm to http://www.gamechoiceawards.com/archive/gdca_4th.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 12:58, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Viewtiful Joe. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20040612195606/http://bestof2003.ign.com/gcn_goty.html to http://bestof2003.ign.com/gcn_goty.html
Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20051013055347/http://www.capcom.co.jp:80/vj/index.html to http://www.capcom.co.jp/vj/index.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:26, 21 July 2016 (UTC)