# Talk:We Are X

Having just expanded this article a bit and now that the film has been released on disc in the USA and UK at least, I was wondering whether the article on We Are X is good enough to be promoted to Good Article status. If you think there is still work that needs to be done let me know. ISD (talk) 11:07, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:We Are X/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Bluesphere (talk · contribs) 03:40, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

Happy to give this one a review. I'll have to thoroughly examine the article first. Bluesphere 03:40, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, spelling, and grammar):  b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): 

It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):  d (copyvio and plagiarism): 

It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 

It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 

It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 

Overall:
Pass/Fail: