# Talk:You're No Good (Jesse Fuller song)

This review is transcluded from Talk:You're No Good (Jesse Fuller song)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: K. Peake (talk · contribs) 08:45, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

This can be completed by me within a day! --K. Peake 08:45, 7 December 2022 (UTC)


### Lead
No infobox here is acceptable since it could be disputed which one would belong at the top
"that appeared as the first track" → "that first appeared as the opening track"
Mention the release year of Dylan's eponymous album
Add a sentence after the first one about how Dylan recorded eight takes
"Dylans version is more" → "Dylan's version is more"
Change the although part to simply mentioning that some critics praised its opening track, to avoid too much detail for the lead


### Jesse Fuller version
Infobox looks good!
Mention the release year of "San Francisco Bay Blues"
"written and performed by Fuller was" → "written and performed by Fuller, was"
"washboard and fotdella" → "washboard, and fotdella"
"on the album's back cover." → "on its back cover."
"The notes claim that" → "The notes claim,"


### Bob Dylan version
Pipe John H. Hammond to John Hammond (record producer) in the infobox


#### Background and recording
Pipe John H. Hammond to John Hammond (record producer)
""'cause we were..." should not use double speech marks twice at the start
"but this was abandoned after interruptions, and later abandoned" double usage of abandoned reads confusingly; reword this
Added some details, which hopefully helps. BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 14:28, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
Remove wikilink on liner notes
Remove excess space after "She's No Good"
Either remove, replace or add appropriate text to the img per MOS:IMAGERELEVANCE
"one of several songs" → "was one of several songs"
"me' [in "You're No Good"]"." → "me' [in 'You're No Good']"."
I tweaked the wording here a bit. BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 14:39, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
"Harvey thinks that" → "Harvey thought that" to be consistent


#### Reception
Either relate the Michael Gray review to the song or remove it
"seem likely to have"" → "seem likely to have"."
Uncut should be italicised
"Robert Shelton wrote about the song" → "Shelton wrote about the song"
Why does the Shelton quote have a speech mark at the end when one is not used to start it?
Amended. I've also trimmed the quote slightly at both ends. BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 14:47, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
"said in a 2022 interview that he had" → "said in a 2022 interview he had"


### Notes
Good


### References
Copyvio score looks very strong at 9.1%!!!
Wikilink New Malden
Wikilink Simon & Schuster
Author-link Michael Gray (author) and wikilink Continuum International Publishing Group
Wikilink Scarecrow Press per MOS:LINK2SECT
Bodley Head → The Bodley Head with the wikilink
Author-link Spencer Leigh
Pipe Black Dog & Leventhal to Black Dog & Leventhal Publishers
Author-link Robert Shelton (critic)
Wikilink Omnibus Press
Wikilink Stateside Records on ref 2
Ref 10 is missing a work/publisher
Wikilink The Pittsburgh Press on ref 22
Pipe Uncut to Uncut (magazine) on ref 23
Pipe Goldmine to Goldmine (magazine) on ref 24


### Final comments and verdict
 On hold until all of the issues are fixed; this had been in the queue for so long that this review was long overdue! --K. Peake 09:46, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
Many thanks, K. Peake. Hopefully I've addressed everything, but let me know if more is required. Regards, BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 15:04, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
 Pass now, I briefly copyedited but thanks for the quick response! --K. Peake 10:29, 8 December 2022 (UTC)