# Talk:The Last of Us: Left Behind

I don't know know much about this. I also don't know whether I am allowed to just change it or if I need to do anything else (when changing a "Start" to a "C" you just make the one edit on the talk page). The reason I say this in the first place is because they say that "GA" and "Featured Articles" are strict. To me it is clearly a "Good Article". —DangerousJXD (talk) 03:12, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

I appreciate your kind words about the article, DangerousJXD, and for approaching the talk page first. In order to promote this to GA, you'll need to conduct a review to ensure that the article meets the appropriate good article criteria. For more assistance, you should read the Reviewing instructions. Thanks! -- Rhain1999 (talk to me) 06:14, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
Since my post above, I have come to understand how the process works (just thought I'd say that). Why has nobody started it yet? —DangerousJXD (talk) 21:31, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
DangerousJXD, it can often take a long time for someone to start reviewing a GAN; there are still quite a few GA nominees that are yet to be reviewed (as can be seen here). Just so you know, I believe you are eligible to review this article, as you have only made two minor edits to the article so far, but I understand if you wish to avoid doing as such. -- Rhain1999 (talk to me) 00:43, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:The Last of Us: Left Behind/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: GamerPro64 (talk · contribs) 
Gonna stake my claim on reviewing this article. Feedback coming soon. GamerPro64 22:34, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

I am curious why only far-left sources are cited in the article. This article contains no conservative sources criticizing the game for its blatant promotion of the homosexual agenda.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Grubsboer (talk • contribs) 12:32, 25 January 2020 (UTC) 

No such reliable source exists. – Rhain ☔ 13:19, 25 January 2020 (UTC)

The lead sentence currently states that Left Behind is a game; however, I think this description is inaccurate. Left Behind is an expansion pack for the game The Last of Us and it should be introduced as one. The current lead sentence gives the false impression that this title is a full release, when it is not. I know that Left Behind was subsequentially released as a standalone product after it launched, but it initially launched as DLC.
I would like to propose this lead sentence: "The Last of Us: Left Behind is an expansion pack to the 2013 video game The Last of Us, developed by Naughty Dog and published by Sony Computer Entertainment."
This lead sentence would be more in line with other articles covering game expansions, such as BioShock 2: Minerva's Den, Grand Theft Auto: The Ballad of Gay Tony, Cyberpunk 2077: Phantom Liberty, Gears 5: Hivebusters and Dark Souls III: The Ringed City. Zohariko1234 (talk) 23:13, 25 June 2024 (UTC)

I believe the current phrasing is the best version. It is simple, accurate, and complies with the Manual of Style; the proposed version is verbose and misses important details. The game's existence as an expansion is covered appropriately in the second sentence. – Rhain ☔ (he/him) 23:21, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
I agree with Rhain. I think trying to get too specific in the lead sentence produces diminishing returns. Keep it simple in the lead sentence and get into the details later. Popcornfud (talk) 06:20, 26 June 2024 (UTC)