# Talk:Patchway railway station

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 05:50, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

I edited the text slightly to make it clear that Patchway railway station is not actually located in Patchway at all, but in nearby Little Stoke. Johnsjames (talk) 09:19, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
Is Patchway still considered a town and Little Stoke a village?  Whatever the technicalities are I would consider these places now suburbs of Bristol.  I would also think that the station's location right next to Rolls-Royce Bristol would be worth a mention. Chardn (talk) 21:56, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Patchway railway station/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Sainsf (talk · contribs) 06:10, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Hi! Will review this. Sainsf <^>Feel at home 06:10, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Well-written article. Only a few points to make: Sainsf <^>Feel at home 16:25, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

Description
A note can be added on what the "chain" unit is.
Already in note 1. -mattbuck (Talk) 16:45, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Sorry, did not notice. Sainsf <^>Feel at home 16:50, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Can CCTV camera be linked?
I didn't link it on grounds of not liking common concepts, but ok, can do. -mattbuck (Talk) 16:45, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
As you like. Sainsf <^>Feel at home 16:50, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Services
Great Western Railway who operate most I think "who" should be "that" and the Railway should be considered a single unit, and thus it should be said "operates".
Sorted. -mattbuck (Talk) 17:43, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Several duplicate links:  London Paddington, Filton Abbey Wood, South Wales Main Line, Bristol Parkway, Pilning.
Regarding duplicate links, it's always been my opinion that there should be no duplicates within level 2 headings, but that having the same link in several sections should be ok on the grounds that people don't always read the entire article, especially when it's a long one. -mattbuck (Talk) 10:00, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
I see your point. Alright, duplinks can be kept if they are necessary. Sainsf <^>Feel at home 06:08, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
History
More duplinks:  Bristol Temple Meads, River Severn, Pilning, South Wales Main Line, Henbury Loop Line, South Gloucestershire, Great Western Railway, Arriva CrossCountry, Manchester Piccadilly.
and few details about it survive I think "remain" would be better than "survive"
I'm not sure remain implies quite the same thing. I've reworded it to very little else is known about it. -mattbuck (Talk) 16:45, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Fine. Sainsf <^>Feel at home 16:50, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
 the gradient between Pilning and Patchway, 1 in 68 Can this be explained in simpler words?
I'm really not sure how to be more simple than 1 in 68. -mattbuck (Talk) 16:45, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Perhaps link gradient? I am not familiar with this term here, so could not get it. Sainsf <^>Feel at home 16:50, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
That's done now. -mattbuck (Talk) 17:11, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
What is a community mosaic?
I've replaced community with decorative. -mattbuck (Talk) 16:45, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Fine. Sainsf <^>Feel at home 16:50, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Future
Duplinks:Greater Western passenger franchise, impending upgrade to the Great Western Main Line, CrossCountry
Citations
Lower case in ref. no.s 36 and 48.
The capital letters are in the original documents, I thought it best to stick with the original format. -mattbuck (Talk) 16:45, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
OK. Sainsf <^>Feel at home 16:50, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
That should be all. These done, I would be glad to promote this. Good luck! Sainsf <^>Feel at home 16:25, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
I believe all the issues have now been addressed. This article is ready for promotion. Great job! Sainsf <^>Feel at home 06:08, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

Thankyou very much! -mattbuck (Talk) 07:34, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Patchway railway station. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.dft.gov.uk/pgr/rail/passenger/franchises/winnernewcrosscounty
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 13:23, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Patchway railway station. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160304100701/http://www.timetableworld.com/book_viewer.php?id=5&section_id=1327 to http://www.timetableworld.com/book_viewer.php?id=5&section_id=1327
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120314050333/http://www.walesandwest.co.uk/ to http://www.walesandwest.co.uk/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:20, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

I had thought of changing the Historical Rail infobox to make it clearer which Pilning station each line refers to, but I need to check something. The infobox shows the Bristol and South Wales Union Line as having been used continuously from 1868 to 1948.
I haven't checked the sources used, but the Bristol and South Wales Union Railway article states that the line ceased operation in 1886, with passenger services restarting in 1922 and finishing again in 1964.
I realise that this infobox is already very long, but should it reflect this? Thanks.
Aoeuidhtns (talk) 00:37, 4 February 2022 (UTC)