# Talk:Wells Fargo Building (Philadelphia)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Wells Fargo Building (Philadelphia)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 19:05, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.
I aim to post a preliminary review within 48 hours. Jezhotwells (talk) 19:05, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
Disambiguations: none found.
Linkrot: none found. Jezhotwells (talk) 19:09, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
My apologies for the delay on this, real life issues. Jezhotwells (talk) 16:37, 1 July 2011 (UTC)


### Checking against GA criteria
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose):  b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): 
Prose is good, I made a few minor copy-edits. Accords with key elements of the MoS.
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 
Statements are well referenced to RS, no evidence of OR.
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 
Thorough with no unnecessary trivia.
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 
NPOV
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 
Article is stable
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 
Images licensed and tagged
Overall:
Pass/Fail: 
An interesting article. Once again my apologies for the delay in completing the review. I have thoroughly read the article, made a few minor copy-edits and am happy to pass this as worthy of GA status. Jezhotwells (talk) 16:37, 1 July 2011 (UTC)