# Talk:Political abuse of psychiatry in the Soviet Union

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Political abuse of psychiatry in the Soviet Union. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.imwerden.info/belousenko/books/kgb/podrabinek_karat_med.htm
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131202221308/http://old.novayagazeta.ru/st/online/519050/ to http://old.novayagazeta.ru/st/online/519050/
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140221114414/http://imrussia.org/ru/project/534-they-chose-freedom-the-story-of-soviet-dissidents to http://imrussia.org/ru/project/534-they-chose-freedom-the-story-of-soviet-dissidents
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.imwerden.info/belousenko/books/kgb/podrabinek_karat_med.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:01, 16 December 2017 (UTC)

It has been a while since this article has been reviewed, so I took a look and saw the "too long" yellow banner placed in the article in Dec. 2024. I agree with this banner, as I see lots of sections with a significant amount of information that could be spun out or summarised more effectively. These sections include "Sluggish schizophrenia", "Incomplete figures" (where the block quotes can also be summarised, instead of having all the text in the article), "Theoretical analysis" (where many paragraphs should be split up or reduced, subheadings should be placed, and information spun out), "Residual problems" (same concerns as theoretical), and "Documents and memoirs" (where I think most of this list can be spun out, with a summary in this article of the most notable, especially the memoirs). 
Should this article go to WP:GAR? Z1720 (talk) 20:26, 9 November 2025 (UTC)