# Talk:Pleasant Dreams

This review is transcluded from Talk:Pleasant Dreams/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Seabuckthorn (talk · contribs) 23:02, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
Nominator: CrowzRSA
Hi! My review for this article will be here shortly.  --Seabuckthorn ♥ 23:02, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

1: Well-written

a. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors: 
b. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists: 

2: Verifiable with no original research

a. Has an appropriate reference section:  Yes
b. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:  excellent (Thorough check on Google.)

c. No original research:   Done

3: Broad in its coverage

4: Neutral

5: Stable: No edit wars, etc:  Yes
6: Images  Done (NFC with a valid FUR)

As per the above checklist, there are no issues with the article and it’s a GA (minor issues – Januray typo & "Prior to going working with , the Ramones' had … " something missing ). The prose quality in particular is meticulous and engrossing. Thanks, CrowzRSA, very much for your conscientious contributions. 
Promoting the article to GA status.  --Seabuckthorn ♥ 23:40, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for the review Seabuckthorn, I really appreciate the swiftness and dedication to reviewing for me!! I also have fixed the minor issues you found in the prose. Again, thanks!! CrowzRSA 00:05, 28 February 2014 (UTC)