# Talk:Sir Bevil Grenville's Monument

What else do people think needs to be done to this article to ensure it meets the Good article criteria before a nomination?— Rod talk 08:20, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Sir Bevil Grenville's Monument/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Miyagawa (talk · contribs) 10:54, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Grabbing this one for a review shortly. Miyagawa (talk) 10:54, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
Ok, review time.

Lead: Swap around cites 3 and 2 so that they're in the correct numerical order.
Done.— Rod talk 20:43, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
History: As with the other article, move citations to after the following punctuation mark for cleanliness.
As before done where a cite only covers one fact in the sentence but moved now
Typo in the last sentence of the section: "rapairs" - "repairs"
Done.— Rod talk 20:43, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
"funded by Granvilles descendants" = "funded by Granville's descendants"?
Thanks - I'm always being criticised for apostrophe abuse.— Rod talk 20:43, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
Description: Link English Baroque
Done.— Rod talk 20:43, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
"Battle of Lansdowne(1643)" - needs a space between Lansdowne and (1643)
Done.— Rod talk 20:43, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
Background - I'd move this section up above History, as it'll be the first thing to occur in the timeline.
Moved.— Rod talk 20:43, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
Once you've dealt with those, I'll take another look. Miyagawa (talk) 20:33, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Thanks again.— Rod talk 20:43, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
Great, happy to promote this one too. Miyagawa (talk) 22:48, 1 March 2015 (UTC)