# Talk:TNA World Beer Drinking Championship

This review is transcluded from Talk:TNA World Beer Drinking Championship/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: MathewTownsend (talk · contribs) 19:31, 12 January 2012 (UTC)

ok, I'll review it shortly.  MathewTownsend (talk) 19:31, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
GA review-see WP:WIAGA for  criteria (and here for what they are not)

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose: clear and concise, correct spelling and grammar:
"and Young took the championship with him, having apparently won it" - took the championship, like walking out the door with it?
I rewrote sentence, but yep that's pretty much the point. Storm passed out, so he won. Picked up the title and walked away.--WillC 22:39, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
"The first round was a "never have I ever" round" - what is this?
Sadly, this was a time when TNA wrote some of the dumbest stuff. Its a skit. They are playing beer games. I tried to explain what was going on better.--WillC 22:39, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
"The second round was contested with both participants having beer bottles taped to their hands and neither being allowed to go to the bathroom.  - what's happening here. I don't get it.
Extension of the skit. They were trying to be funny.--WillC 22:39, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
"Young won after Storm wet himself, which was confirmed by the newly named Jackie Moore".  - "wet" as in peeing? Who is Jackie Moore?
Yes, exactly. I felt it sounded better than peeing. Ms. Jackie renamed. I explained that better.--WillC 22:39, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
"after interference from Rhino" - what is "interference" here?
Fixed--WillC 22:39, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
"Storm won the bout after Moore retrieved the championship for him without the referee seeing" - explain? What didn't the referee see?
Fixed--WillC 22:39, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
B. Complies with  MoS for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation: 

Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. Provides references to all sources: 

B. Provides in-line citations from reliable sources where necessary: 

C. No original research: 

Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Main aspects are addressed: 

B. Remains focused: 

Does it follow the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc: 

Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales: 

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions: 

Overall:
Pass or Fail: 

Also, I made some edits which you should check for accuracy - that I didn't inadvertently introduce error.[1]
I will put this on hold so you can respond.
MathewTownsend (talk) 21:24, 12 January 2012 (UTC)

Reply
just one more qurestion: "The first round was a "never have I ever" round, in which the participants had to admit to experiences they had never been involved in. If the opponent had partaken in a similar action he was forced to drink a shot." Do you mean that if the westler had never had the experience, but his oponent has, then the oponent is forced to drink another shot?  MathewTownsend (talk) 22:54, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
Yes, best way I know how to word it currently.--WillC 23:21, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
Reevaluation after fixes

1. Well written?:  Pass
2. Factually accurate?:  Pass
3. Broad in coverage?:  Pass
4. Neutral point of view?:  Pass
5. Article stability?:  Pass
6. Images?:  Pass
Congratulations!  MathewTownsend (talk) 23:26, 12 January 2012 (UTC)

Thank you very much for passing and reviewing this article.--WillC 23:28, 12 January 2012 (UTC)

The article may be good but the subject is stupid.
Radio Sharon (talk) 14:26, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

Can Anyone be able to find a fair use image of the belt (WorldSeriesOfPoker500 (talk) 14:44, 24 March 2012 (UTC))

Insignificant title overall, with it mostly being a comedy prop. A fair use image in this point would be pointless.--WillC 10:05, 25 March 2012 (UTC)