# Talk:Prior Park Landscape Garden

Not much information here.   Who owned it after Allen?  When did the National Trust take over?  Deipnosophista (talk) 22:09, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

Should Prior Park really direct to this page, as Prior Park is the house and it's not really the same as the gardens! Abbyemery 12:25, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

What are the four palladian bridges left? (1) Stowe (2) Prior Park (3) Tsarskoye Selo (4) .. ? Something tells me there might be more. NVO (talk) 19:19, 20 September 2009 (UTC)

Wilton House - see Wilton_House#The_gardens_and_grounds 86.147.160.133 (talk) 13:40, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

Probably not worth putting on the Prior Park page itself, but possibly of interest.86.147.160.133 (talk) 13:39, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

I saw this was nominated for GA and I thought it should be noting that it is not home to one of four Palladian bridges, but to one of four in its specific style. Also the screen wall is known as Sham Bridge, a reference I believe to the nearby, somewhat related Sham Castle.--TangoTizerWolfstone (talk) 08:22, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for your comment. The wikilink in both the lead and the section point to Palladian architecture so this is the architectural style - do you think it would be better to change the link to make it is clear it is the style which is being referred to? Re Sham Bridge: This source says "Thus the Sham Bridge at Prior Park is reminiscent of Kent's cascade at Chiswick House, or Venus' Vale at Rousham", but doesn't mention Sham Castle. My understanding is that Sham Castle was built for the view from Ralph Allen's Town House, Bath rather than Prior Park.— Rod talk 18:04, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
It is still correct to Palladian architecture so I don't see any problem there, and that I noted a somewhat relation between Sham Bridge and  Sham Castle was just that they were Ralph Allen-coined "sham" follies, and wanted to note the name of Sham Bridge as it was not mentioned in the article. I'm certainly no expert on producing GAs but I just thought I'd help out.--TangoTizerWolfstone (talk) 19:56, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
I've made some edits which I hope are in line with what you are thinking?— Rod talk 20:15, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
Well all looks good to me :) Good luck with the GA nomination. --TangoTizerWolfstone (talk) 03:13, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Prior Park Landscape Garden/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: The Rambling Man (talk · contribs) 09:56, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

Comments - nice piece of work.

I think I'd be happier to see where the Garden is before being told who designed it.
Reworded.— Rod talk 12:19, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
Funnily enough, I don't think poet needs linking but landscape gardener perhaps does...
Links changed.— Rod talk 12:19, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
Is there a suitable link for "Grade I listed"?
I don't think so - different to listed building etc.— Rod talk 12:19, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
National Trust is overlinked in the lead; worse: the second one is incorrect.
Changed.— Rod talk 12:19, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
"orihinally" typo.
Ooops - fixed.— Rod talk 12:19, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
"Humphrey Colles, then Matthew Colhurst" any context for who these folks were?
Both MPs - the reference given doesn't say this but History of Parliament gives their details but doesn't include ownership of Prior Park so I'm not sure whether to include additional references for the claim that they were MPs?— Rod talk 12:19, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
It would be helpful, otherwise you might as well just say it was purchased twice, and not include the details.  The Rambling Man (talk) 20:09, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
Links & refs added.— Rod talk 20:27, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
"Purchased by Ralph Allen in the 1720s.[2] Prior Park's " comma probably.
Changed.— Rod talk 12:19, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
"Prior Park's 11.3 hectares ... house, Prior Park," this works oddly to me, you link Prior Park on the second instance in this sentence, and it appears you may be using Prior Park to describe both the Garden and the house in the same sentence...
I've removed the second reference to Prior Park which at the time was all one thing which included both house & gardens.— Rod talk 12:19, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
English landscape garden is overlinked.
I see this once in the lead & once in 18th century design.— Rod talk 12:19, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
Twice in the latter section. The Rambling Man (talk) 15:09, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
Ah one was English Landscape Garden and once English Garden - both pointing to the same place - now done.— Rod talk 15:25, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
"1750s and '60s" not sure on MOS here, but I would prefer to see 1760s rather than '60s.
Done.— Rod talk 12:19, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
"Prior Park's 11.3 hectares (28 acres) English landscape garden was laid out" vs "In 1993 11.3 hectares (28 acres) of the park" so, all of it?
Yep (everything but the house/school) removed in the Restoration section.— Rod talk
Plus I'd expect a comma after 1993.
Is this still needed now the area has been removed?— Rod talk 12:19, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
Ref 23 could use an en-dash in that year range rather than a hyphen.
I've never understood the purpose of this distinction, but hopefully done.— Rod talk 12:19, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
Neat article, a few issues noted above, so I'll place it on hold for a bit.  The Rambling Man (talk) 11:27, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
"During 1737, at least 55,200 trees, mostly elm and Scots pine, were planted, along the sides and top of the valley. The valley floor remained as grassland and drainage water was channelled to form fish ponds at the bottom of the valley." needs referencing, then I think we're done.  The Rambling Man (talk) 20:45, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

Ref added (in the history tab of the Parks & Gardens UK record).— Rod talk 21:21, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
All good, I'll pass to GA.  If you could just tweak that ISBN so it's the "preferred" format, that'd be great.  The Rambling Man (talk) 07:06, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Prior Park Landscape Garden. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090413011503/http://www.nationaltrust.org.uk/main/w-vh/w-visits/w-findaplace/w-priorpark/ to http://www.nationaltrust.org.uk/main/w-vh/w-visits/w-findaplace/w-priorpark/
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150924081829/http://www.priorparkcollege.com/Ethos-and-History.asp to http://www.priorparkcollege.com/Ethos-and-History.asp
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:35, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Prior Park Landscape Garden. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150403195921/http://www.nationaltrust.org.uk/article-1356402532573/ to http://www.nationaltrust.org.uk/article-1356402532573/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:52, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

Hello! During late June, July and some of August, I'm working on a paid project sponsored by the National Trust to review and enhance coverage of NT sites. You can find the pilot edits here, as well as a statement and contact details for the National Trust. I am leaving this message when I make a first edit to a page; please do get in touch if you have any concerns. Lajmmoore (talk) 18:39, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Palladian Wide Swan.jpg
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 05:42, 8 December 2022 (UTC)