# Talk:O'Brien-class destroyer

This review is transcluded from Talk:O'Brien class destroyer/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Below is my review:

GA review (see here for criteria)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose):  b (MoS): 

It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 

It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars etc.: 

It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 

Overall:
Pass/Fail: 

I tried hard, but really couldn't find any issues. It is frustrating when you cannot find a single mistake without being too nitpicky. The article is already GA-class just like the ship articles of the class. Cheers for brilliant Bellhalla. - DSachan (talk) 19:43, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

I am concerned that this article does not meet the good article criteria anymore because there is uncited prose, including entire paragraphs. While this is a well-written article, the information needs to be cited to retain its GA designation. Is anyone willing to review the sources and cite this text? Z1720 (talk) 21:52, 19 August 2024 (UTC)


### O'Brien-class destroyer