# Talk:The Sixth Extinction (The X-Files)

This review is transcluded from Talk:The Sixth Extinction (The X-Files)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: GreatOrangePumpkin (talk · contribs) 14:15, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
For an unknown reason, Wizardman deleted this page. Maybe it was just impatience... 

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose):  b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): 
Good prose; no complaints
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 
References reliable; formating is consistent and follows the guidelines
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 

It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 

It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 
Infobox screenshot image is non-free but it follows the non-free file criteria, and its FUR is complete and does not violate the mentioned criteria. Second file is in public domain. Captions are good
Overall:
Pass/Fail: 
I see no issues with this article. I did not like how it was removed without discussion (maybe the nominator proposed it, I don't know). I was busy in the last days, so forgive my delay. Good work as usual! :)--♫GoP♫TCN 14:15, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
Sorry to mention this about three months late, but I just want you to know that it wasn't me. :P --Gen. Quon (talk) 21:55, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
Sometimes nominations that have been inactive are deleted so that the article appears in the queue as unreviewed again, checking the page logs might show who deleted it. 22:03, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on The Sixth Extinction. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://space.com/sciencefiction/tv/xfiles_701_991108.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 15:07, 1 April 2016 (UTC)