# Talk:Quince

The article became a GA earlier this year, but - while improvements are always welcome - the addition of an elaborate table showing 60 years of outdated history in production by Иованъ with edit Special:Diff/1298619908 is WP:UNDUE. The simpler table format and text that existed before (needs updating to the latest UN info for 2023) was adequate and sufficiently informative. 
Let's think about what basic information the general reader would be seeking about production: a. most recent data (2023), b. world total, and c. leading countries seems sufficient. Not everything about production going back 60 years and remaining out of date (to 2021) needs to be discussed, as exists in the current production section. 
Including minor producers, such as those listed below #6, then discussing very minor producers, such as Russia and Bulgaria, seems really out of place. Further, the text edited into the revision is entirely the WP:OR interpretation by user Иованъ, having no secondary sources (only the FAOSTAT data).
What do GA editors Chiswick Chap and BigChrisKenney feel about this? Zefr (talk) 18:03, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

No objection to having the table removed. It's not needed and it affects the article's balance. Chiswick Chap (talk) 18:07, 4 July 2025 (UTC)
I will be expanding and splitting the section off into a standalone article. The section was not ready yet, so I have removed it. Well, not without collaboration, anyway. Ⰻⱁⰲⰰⱀⱏ (ⰳⰾ) 18:16, 4 July 2025 (UTC)