# Talk:Taki (Soulcalibur)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Taki (Soulcalibur). Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.computerandvideogames.com/184582/new-soul-calibur-iv-lady-revealed/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 06:06, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

A long page, with excessive detail, could be shortened. Please discuss, below, which level of details should be removed or retained. -Wikid77 (talk) 19:42, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
Surely not the so-called "plot". (But for example Chai Xianghua's actually might actually make use of it, I guess.) I already shortened the reception section (and it's kinda funny I just heard the reception is "not enough" still, allegedly, anyway). --SNAAAAKE!! (talk) 19:41, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

I'm going to be bluntly direct with you, the article as a whole is way overbloated. It's difficult to read, a lot of the sources that I went through earlier barely mention the character in passing, and there's a lot of cruft as a whole. The notes should really be gone through and reworked into the article if possible, all they serve to do right now is make it 'bigger' but even harder to read through. There's enough notability for Taki to keep an article on here, but it needs a complete overhaul and trimmed hard.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 07:44, 26 August 2018 (UTC)