# Talk:Texas Recreational Road 2

This review is transcluded from Talk:Texas Recreational Road 2/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Dom497 (talk · contribs) 00:36, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality: 
Quality of the article is good.
B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists: 
Article complies with MoS.
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources: 
Good.
B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary: 
References support all statements included in the article.
C. No original research: 
No original research found.
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects: 
All major aspects of the topic have been covered.
B. Focused: 
Article remains focused throughout.
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias: 
No bias found.
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc: 
Article is stable.
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales: 
Image is tagged correctly.
B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions: 
Appropriate image is used with a suitable caption.
Overall:
Pass or Fail: 
Pass!--Dom497 (talk) 00:55, 21 June 2012 (UTC)


### Comments
Nothing needs to be fixed on the nominators part. I have fixed the minor issues within the the article.--Dom497 (talk) 00:55, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Texas Recreational Road 2/GA3. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Neonblak (talk · contribs) 11:26, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
I will be reviewing this nomination. Seems to have been delisted, although there is no information posted as to why.Neonblak talk -  11:26, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
Review
There are no disambiguation, or external link issues. The photos used appear to be compliant with WP guidelines. All links appear to be formatted correctly. I saw only very minor issues, they are listed below:

Lead
1. Since you already abreviated Recreational Road 2 to RE2, no need to revert back to it full name in the last line of the lead.

History
1. " By 1961, the road had been improved to a metal surface..." - I would change "the road" to "it", since the word combo was used in the previous sentence, reads slightly clunky.
Thats it, that's all I saw, so I will put this on hold, and look forward to passing this article.Neonblak talk -  11:46, 16 August 2013 (UTC)

I have addressed your concerns. Thanks for the review. Its been forever since I nominated it. And just for clarification, the first time this was listed it was about 4 kb in length. After a long discussion, it was merged. After some research, I was able to expand it out into its current appearance. Thanks again for the review, - Awardgive. Help out with Project Fillmore County 18:30, 16 August 2013 (UTC)