# Talk:Pennsylvania Route 21

Anyone have any pictures? If not, I guess I'll get some. Deigo (talk) 04:34, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Pennsylvania Route 21/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
GA review (see here for criteria)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose):  b (MoS): 

It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 
PA highways, is this a WP:RS? Also, could you use an actual direct link for the Google Map, and possibly use the {{cite map}} template for citation?
The PA highways site is used for a lot of Pennsylvania highway articles, so I figured it was reliable.  Check it out and let me know if it'll work.  If not I'll find something better.  I'll work on the map links. Deigo (talk) 14:09, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
Check the WP:RS noticeboard, and if they give it the green light, give me the perm link to the approval --Admrb♉ltz (t • c • log) 14:11, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
Someone said "maybe" Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard. It's on the bottom. Deigo (talk) 15:04, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 

It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars etc.: 

It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 

Overall:
Pass/Fail: 
Please address the reference issues. On hold. --Admrb♉ltz (t • c • log) 04:45, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
Pass --Admrb♉ltz (t • c • log) 03:36, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

This article has failed the USRD GA audit and will be sent to WP:GAR if the issues are not resolved within one week. Please see WT:USRD for more details, and please ask me if you have any questions as to why this article failed. --Rschen7754 (T C) 07:01, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

This discussion is transcluded from Talk:Pennsylvania Route 21/GA2. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.
Largely the article does not have broad coverage, the lead is too short, and relies on WP:SPS for the history. I will leave this up for a week for fixes to be made. --Rschen7754 06:59, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

I have redone the history using reliable sources and expanded the lead. Dough4872 01:13, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
GAR has been closed as keep. --Rschen7754 01:18, 11 June 2013 (UTC)