# Talk:Simon Wormull

This review is transcluded from Talk:Simon Wormull/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

This article is in decent shape, but it needs more work before it becomes a Good Article.
Is it well written?
A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct: 
In the Early career section, "In 1995" it would be best to add a comma after 1995. Done
Check. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 19:43, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation: 

Is it verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check?
A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline: 
References should come after the parentheses. Rearranged: replaced parentheses with endashes so that each reference can remain with the item being referenced.
Nice thinking and check. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 19:43, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose): 

C. It contains no original research: 

D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism: 

Is it broad in its coverage?
A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic: 

B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style): 

Is it neutral?
It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each: 
In the Dover Athletic section, this ---> "His performance with Dover earned him international recognition", sounds like POV. Reworded for clarity.
Check. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 19:43, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
Is it stable?
It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute: 

Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content: 

B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions: 

Overall:
Pass or Fail: 
If the following statements can be answered, I will pass the article. Good luck with improving this article!
--  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 17:15, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

Hope the changes made are satisfactory... cheers, Struway2 (talk) 17:51, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
Thank you to Struway2 for getting the stuff I left at the talk page, because I have gone off and placed the article as GA. Congrats. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 19:43, 8 September 2008 (UTC)