# Talk:Skathi (moon)

Actually, the correct spelling has an eth (a D with a cross bar), so both Skadi and Skathi are approximations. Pronunciation [SKAH-dhee] (with [dh] representing the th of English this).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.74.199.199 (talk • contribs) 07:29, 30 July 2004 (UTC)

I'm not going through all this again - I contacted the organisation within the International Astronomical Union responsible for the naming of objects in our solar system and got responses from *two* of them to indicate that Skathi was the accepted and recognised name for this body.  If you feel the need to do further independant research, then knock yourself out. Zaphod Beeblebrox 11:39, 30 Jul 2004 (UTC)
I shouldn't've used the word "correct". I meant the original orthography. "Skathi" is preferable to "Skadi" as the English transliteration, so I'm glad the IAU changed it.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kwamikagami (talk • contribs) 22:03, 12 August 2004 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Skathi (moon). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060428012314/http://cfa-www.harvard.edu:80/iauc/07500/07538.html to http://cfa-www.harvard.edu/iauc/07500/07538.html
Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080709055841/http://cfa-www.harvard.edu/iauc/08100/08177.html to http://cfa-www.harvard.edu/iauc/08100/08177.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 04:56, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

Just for information: This page appears in the top 50 most visited Wikipedia articles. It's clearly not coming from people interested in the moon, most likely it's some sort of automated request from an unknown program. More information in the phabricator ticket and astronomy project page (permanent link). --mfb (talk) 06:58, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
And stopped in Oct 2022. -- Kheider (talk) 17:50, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
There's still an unnatural amount of daily views from several hundreds to thousands, but definitely much lower than before.[1] Nrco0e (talk) 20:17, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
That could come from older top50 lists and related discussions. The article got many internal and external links you wouldn't normally have for such an unremarkable object. --mfb (talk) 08:49, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
That would make sense, but the cut-off is abrupt and to me would indicate that these views were automated. Asayihilar (talk) 05:37, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
Views have dropped more starting in July 2023, now we are at ~10/day, which is similar to other tiny but named Saturn moons. --mfb (talk) 10:15, 7 January 2025 (UTC)