# Talk:Wash Us in the Blood

@RodeoWrld: Any source for the new songwriters/producers you altered? Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Thanks ♥) 15:44, 17 July 2020 (UTC)

User:Nice4What They were never new, they've always been there. Not sure what you're talking about. Thanks. RodeoWrld (talk) 19:10, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
@RodeoWrld: "Always been there"... Been where? If you're talking about Qobuz, your edit removed the citation so all songwriters/producers were uncited. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Thanks ♥) 19:19, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
User:Nice4What No I'm definitely not talking about Qobuz, I never even used that as a source ever. The credits are pretty much the same across all platforms like Spotify, YouTube and Tidal that display credits, Qobuz isn't the only platform that exclusively show credits. I think you're confused. RodeoWrld (talk) 18:02, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
@RodeoWrld: Yes, I was confused because you didn't provide a source! I usually use Tidal but the song was never uploaded to that platform. Spotify credits are also only available to members. I almost never use Qobuz, but it was cited by another user at the time that the credits/personnel were added to this article. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Thanks ♥) 15:50, 21 July 2020 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Wash Us in the Blood/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: The Ultimate Boss (talk · contribs) 06:08, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

I will review this soon.The Ultimate Boss (talk) 06:08, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

The Ultimate Boss Any updates on this? --K. Peake 20:30, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
Well written:
the prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct; 
it complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. 
Verifiable with no original research:
it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline; 
wikilink for Triple J on ref 16
remove wikilink for Triple J on ref 18
 Done for the above --K. Peake 06:11, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
all in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines; 
it contains no original research; and 
it contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism. 
Broad in its coverage:
it addresses the main aspects of the topic; and
it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
How is "Based on the platform's community guidelines, the video was age-restricted" important to the article?
It was reported on West's official Vevo channel, doesn't this qualify notability? --K. Peake 06:11, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content; and
media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
Overall

The Ultimate Boss replied, are you ready to pass this now? --K. Peake 06:11, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
Kyle Peake yes it is! The Ultimate Boss (talk) 07:10, 15 October 2020 (UTC)