# Talk:Soekiman Wirjosandjojo

Unreferenced? All information are pretty basic information that could be seen on other page already in Wikipedia. See Special:WhatLinksHere/Soekiman_Wirjosandjojo. --IvanLanin 12:24, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Soekiman Wirjosandjojo/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Arsonal (talk · contribs) 23:39, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it well written?
A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct: 
I made some fixes throughout. Please revert as needed if I introduced any errors.
B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation: 
This does not impact GA review outcome, but if FA candidacy is planned, the italicization of Indonesian political party and entity names should be updated to conform with MOS:FOREIGNITALIC.
Is it verifiable with no original research?
A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline: 

B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines: 
No issues with reliability of sources. It would be beneficial to update the {{Cite web}} template for Konstituante.net to include Syahrul Hidayat and Kevin W. Fogg as authors to indicate the website's reliability, considering their academic backgrounds.
C. It contains no original research: 

D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism: 

Is it broad in its coverage?
A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic: 

B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style): 

Is it neutral?
It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each: 

Is it stable?
It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute: 

Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content: 

B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions: 

Overall:
Pass or Fail: