# Talk:Schmücke dich, o liebe Seele, BWV 180

I can't agree that the first movement, a chorale, is "like a gigue".  Gardner describes it as a procession.  Mincham as a fantasia.  Calling this graceful piece "a gigue" does disservice to both the cantata and a gigue! Delmlsfan (talk) 23:28, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

You don't have to agree with Dürr, who says so, which is now in the article, together with Gardiners (different) view. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 23:35, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Schmücke dich, o liebe Seele, BWV 180/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Khazar2 (talk · contribs) 17:02, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

I'll be glad to take this review. Bear with me--I'm a little out of practice. Comments to follow in 2-4 days. Thanks in advance for your work on it! -- Khazar2 (talk) 17:02, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

In the "Structure and Scoring" section, the winds listed for the final movement is "2Ob Ot" but there is no information about what Ot represents and there is certainly no such thing as a Transverse Oboe. Is this a typo for "Ft 2Ob"? Guillaime (talk) 16:30, 22 October 2024 (UTC)

Good question! - I found no information, so removed it. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:15, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
I checked the scores (both Bach Gesellschaft Ausgabe and Neue Bach-Ausgabe) on IMSLP and found it should be full orchestral forces for the final choral which would be the usual practice. I have made the change (2Fl 2Ob) to the article. Guillaime (talk) 18:24, 22 October 2024 (UTC)