# Talk:Rolling Acres Mall

Could a list of stores and restaurants that were once in the Rolling Acers Mall be put on the page? I know that Wendy's used to be in the food court. Some stores were also former chains. --24.147.1.197 (talk) 22:41, 29 March 2014 (UTC)Jacob Chesley

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 3 external links on Rolling Acres Mall. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090426052523/http://www.ohio.com:80/news/top_stories/43513897.html to http://www.ohio.com/news/top_stories/43513897.html
Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110110133401/http://www.ohio.com:80/news/break_news/113102159.html to http://www.ohio.com/news/break_news/113102159.html
Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110126075738/http://www.ohio.com:80/news/break_news/114496299.html to http://www.ohio.com/news/break_news/114496299.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 21:28, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Rolling Acres Mall. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110615160214/http://www.ohio.com/news/break_news/33417119.html to http://www.ohio.com/news/break_news/33417119.html
Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110615162119/http://www.ohio.com/news/top_stories/44208967.html to http://www.ohio.com/news/top_stories/44208967.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 20:23, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Rolling Acres Mall. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070311221344/http://www.ohio.com:80/mld/beaconjournal/14990476.htm to http://www.ohio.com/mld/beaconjournal/14990476.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:46, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Rolling Acres Mall/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Helloimahumanbeing (talk · contribs) 06:51, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it well written?
A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct: 
"Also, the cinema reopened under an independent group calling itself Blind Squirrel Cinema", this could be reworded
 Done
B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation: 

Is it verifiable with no original research?
A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline: 

B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines: 

C. It contains no original research: 

D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism: 

Is it broad in its coverage?
A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic: 

B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style): 

Is it neutral?
It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each: 

Is it stable?
It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute: 

Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content: 
@Helloimahumanbeing: Just wondering why this one has a question mark next to it. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 14:00, 31 May 2019 (UTC)

B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions: 

Overall:
Pass or Fail: 

The pic of Rolling Acres as it appeared in January 2014, all boarded up, is what currently appears above the description box. I suggest we change it. There's an immaculate pic of the mall's storefont circa 1992 on a website called Detroit Urbex, and because I don't own that picture, I don't want to be the one to try to upload it because I wouldn't know how to give proper recognition, etc. But regardless, I think the lead section pic above the description box should show the mall when it was at least still in operation. I notice that when public figures pass away, current pictures are replaced w/ pics from when they were much younger. Perhaps a similar criteria with widely known brands? Shamus248 (talk) 21:58, 7 October 2022 (UTC)