# Talk:The Legend of Zelda: Four Swords Adventures

Much better than it was, here is what to do for GA status;

As always, fair use rationales need to be specific as to exactly what is demonstrated in the image and why it is significant.
Three paragraph lead; first says what the game is, who made it, when it was released; second paragraph, summarize the plot, third paragraph, tell us how it was received (reception).
Now don't automatically remove one, since I am just asking, but you should be very clear as to why you need both the diamond image and the attacking image. Are they really so different that you need both? Again, don't reflexively cut one, because they really are necessary they both should stay.
For GA, and even more so for FA, more development information is needed; interviews with creators, changes that were reported in what the game was called or going to be like, influences, that kind of stuff needs to be added to the section, I would shoot for another paragraph if there is the material, and more for FA.
Plot section is unreferenced.
It is probably a matter of personal preference, but the legacy section is so shot, you could probably merge it into the last paragraph of reception.
most of the references are not properly formatted, so make sure all information is included in them, and wikilink the publishers as always.
Gamespot is repeated at least 3 times in the reception section, so rephrase a bit.
Add a bit more detail to the reception section; any criticisms?
And for FA, continue to build your copyediting skills and either get someone to review it or work on it yourself...a good idea is to make a checklist based on what people point out for correction so that you can check future articles with the list before you submit them.
Do that stuff, and let me know how it goes, or if you have any questions. :) Judgesurreal777 (talk) 06:16, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
Alright, should be all done. Doing some minor copyediting now. Gary King (talk) 17:40, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
You did a good rationale on the page of the first game screenshot in the article, write one like that in the other two screenshots, which will then facilitate your decision as to which one to keep. Also, add another sentence to the development section, it is still looking small. That should do it. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 18:17, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
alright done Gary King (talk) 18:28, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
Very good! For FA, the usual stuff of expanding the development section more and copyediting it a bunch. Good work! Judgesurreal777 (talk) 18:34, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

I personally think Nintendo Power shouldn't be referenced in game reviews.
Let's face it. 
It's owned by Nintendo.  Of course they'll give great reviews.  
Especially if Nintendo's personal team creates it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.114.53.51 (talk) 16:53, 24 July 2008 (UTC) 

You'll note that the vast majority of their scores match up with other reviewers. Nintendo just happens to be good at what they do.—Ｌｏｖｅはドコ？ (talk • contribs) 19:27, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
If you'll look at The Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time, you'll see that Nintendo Power actually gave it a lower score than most critics. Pagrashtak 20:27, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on The Legend of Zelda: Four Swords Adventures. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://img835.imageshack.us/img835/3654/clipboard02v.jpg
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 12:47, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on The Legend of Zelda: Four Swords Adventures. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060822031549/http://www.gamerevolution.com/oldsite/games/gamecube/rpg/legend_of_zelda_four_swords.htm to http://www.gamerevolution.com/oldsite/games/gamecube/rpg/legend_of_zelda_four_swords.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:25, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

The redirect Zelda 11 has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 August 14 § Zelda 11 until a consensus is reached.  Steel1943 (talk) 14:59, 14 August 2024 (UTC)