# Talk:Pierre-François Chabaneau

I would like to remove the infobox as being completely redundant. If there is a consensus. Carlotm (talk) 20:46, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Pierre-François Chabaneau/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Hi!  I will be reviewing this article for GA status, and I should have the full review up soon. 

GA review (see here for criteria)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose):  b (MoS): 

It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 

It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 

It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars etc.: 

It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 

Overall:
Pass/Fail: 

Everything looks good with this article, so I am passing it to GA status.  Very nice work! Dana boomer (talk) 15:03, 24 October 2008 (UTC)