# Talk:Real (Ivy Queen album)

Image:Real Album.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 19:04, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Real (Ivy Queen album)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: JayJay (talk · contribs) 16:02, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
I will review the article shortly JayJayWhat did I do? 16:02, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

Okay, that is how Certification references are suppose to be referenced. 15 and 16 are not the same, 15 is the search engine result, while 16 is the actual link to the review which requires a subscription. References 14, 18, 24, 25, and 26 are subscription needed and were like that before they were dead so it doesn't matter. (According to Hahc21) Also, I have not been able to find any reviews :( If I could, trust me I would include them. I've made the images bigger :) Thanks for the review. — DivaKnockouts (talk) 17:44, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
I ment references 20, 24, 31, 32, 33 but let me see if I can fix them. JayJayWhat did I do? 18:30, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
Actually you don't need those refereneces at all just get rid of them. In the charts section replace refs, 31, 32, 33 with 17,18,19. Also have you tried Template:BillboardID function JayJayWhat did I do? 18:49, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
This still shouldn't even matter since they are subscription needed. They support chart positions of some albums and singles. The new Billboard doesn't show all of the chart positions, one would be for Diva, where the Tropical Albums position is not provided so I had to use the older ones. — DivaKnockouts (talk) 20:35, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
I don't know the new layout is really making me mad. JayJayWhat did I do? 22:49, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
The new layout of Billboard? It's that it's missing chart positions for some of Queen's albums such as the "Tropical Albums" and "Reggae Albums". Is this passed or failed? I addressed the pictures, no other reviews have been found (Keep in mind this is a Spanish language reggaeton album, Latin albums don't get a lot of attention, and it's of a genre which was just becoming popular in 2004), the references are used to support chart positions that are missing. I'll see if I can find anything else to expand those two sections you mentioned, though I doubt it, I've looked at every single page listed in Google News Archive with the search "Ivy Queen" "Real" which came up 10 pages of sources which I have looked though. — DivaKnockouts (talk) 22:58, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
Yes I ment the Billboard layout, anyways everything else is fine so I guess I will go ahead and pass this, hopefully the Billboard thing can all get settled. JayJayWhat did I do? 23:36, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
Oh, we'll yes it is very frustrating. Hopefully it will. Thanks for the review and your time. — DivaKnockouts (talk) 23:38, 10 February 2013 (UTC)