# Talk:Skipsea Castle

The first 6 inline external links are all dead links. Has anyone got any other references that can be used for the article? Keith D (talk)  —Preceding comment was added at 21:27, 6 February 2008 (UTC) 

This review is transcluded from Talk:Skipsea Castle/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Jackyd101 (talk · contribs) 20:03, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

Hi there, I have reviewed this article against the Wikipedia:good article criteria and although I am not quite prepared to pass the article for GA immediately, I don't think there is a long way to go - just a couple of minor points. I have listed below the principle problems which prevent this article from achieving GA status. The article now has seven days to address these issues, and should the contributors disagree with my comments then please indicate below why you disagree and suggest a solution, compromise or explanation. Further time will be granted if a concerted effort is being made to address the problems, and as long as somebody is genuinely trying to deal with the issues raised then I will not fail the article. 
I am aware that my standards are quite high, but I feel that an article deserves as thorough a review as possible when applying for GA and that a tough review process here is an important stepping stone to future FAC attempts. Please do not take offence at anything I have said, nothing is meant personally and maliciously and if anyone feels aggrieved then please notify me at once and I will attempt to clarify the comments in question. Finally, should anyone disagree with my review or eventual decision then please take the article to WP:GAR to allow a wider selection of editors to comment on the issues discussed here. Well done on the work so far.


### Issues preventing promotion
It is reasonably well written
a (prose):  b (MoS): 
"which is only around 2 kilometres (1.2 mi) away in the 21st century" might sound better as "which in the 21st century is only around 2 kilometres (1.2 mi) away"
"and a dam was probably constructed" - link dam (since you link harbour)
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 
"a Flemish mercenary and the first Earl of Holderness," are you sure he was the earl - the source just says "lord" and he is not listed among the earls at the linked page.
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
a (fair representation):  b (all significant views): 
It is stable.

It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
a (tagged and captioned):  b (lack of images does not in itself exclude GA):  c (non-free images have fair use rationales): 
Overall:
a Pass/Fail: 
Thanks for the review! I've checked, and some Victorians called Drogo an earl, which may be where the text originally crept in, but you're right, modern sources don't, so I've removed it. Other changes have been made as suggested. Hchc2009 (talk) 08:05, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
It still says earldom in the next line. Change that and I'm happy to promote!--Jackyd101 (talk) 15:35, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
Fixed! ;) Hchc2009 (talk) 17:06, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Skipsea Castle/CommentsTalk:Skipsea Castle/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
Last edited at 10:16, 8 August 2007 (UTC).
Substituted at 06:20, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

hi 
im trying to upload DEM's of various sites taken by myself and modelled/amended by myself. this is all my own work that I wish to share for the benefit of all wishing to research the subject herein but I keep getting an error: we cannot determine if this pic is suitable for Wikipedia Commons
why is this? whats the problem please?
15:47, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
Tonyh65 (talk) 15:47, 19 November 2019 (UTC)