# Talk:The Sea Urchin (1913 film)

This is just a few more references showing nothing exceptional or of great value to the article:

Another advertisement offering nothing more than a showing.
Another
These might be useful those who want to track the release cycles. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 22:45, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:The Sea Urchin (1913 film)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Good888 (talk · contribs) 12:04, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
I am going to review ALL of the films you have listed at the good article nominations page. It may take more than seven days so please be patient. good888 (talk) 12:04, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
Lead section

Link hunchback under kyphosis.
"The film is now considered lost." Suggest rewriting to: "The film is presumed lost"
Production

"and distributed by The Universal Film Manufacturing Company." Should be linked under Universal Studios.
"The film's production number was 0101." Do you have a source confirming this?
Release and legacy

"Link picturesque.
"In an advertisement in Rushville, Indiana the filmw" I have removed that w.
Going to place on hold for now. good888 (talk) 13:48, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

@Good888: - Fixes done. And bit of a note, the Universal Studios and its earlier incarnation are different in a sense, but the article for that does not exist yet. Silent Era covers the production code - so I didn't cite it directly at the end of each sentence because of all the information being reflected by that same source. The Films of Lon Chaney confirms it - but I suspect that it came from Braff's work, which also confirms. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 17:24, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
Gave this article another look and found no issues. Hence, I am passing. good888 (talk) 13:39, 3 February 2015 (UTC)