# Talk:Stardust (Willie Nelson album)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Stardust (Willie Nelson album)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: GreatOrangePumpkin (talk · contribs) 11:12, 1 December 2011 (UTC)
Looks nice :)! I remember it stubby, but now... another great article 

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose):  b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): 

It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 

It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 

It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 

It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 

Overall:
Pass/Fail: 

ISBN/ISSN check: The short footnote's 13 and the book reference's date are different
Dabsolver check: fixed two dabs
Checklinks check: ok
Reflinks check: ok
Fixed dashes
Do you agree with this edit? I think it was reasonable; if you agree with me, then their rating and refs should be removed.
On hold I give you time to fix these issues.
Pass I changed the date for the Draper Robert short footnotes (1991->1986 as the reference below suggest October 11 1986 as date). Also as a test I found the October 11 Billboard magazine, and looking at the front cover, I think it was the correct magazine and my edit accurate.

"On the number, Nelson was interviewed by Pete Axthelm."  What does "on the number" mean? Bubba73 You talkin' to me? 06:38, 8 August 2024 (UTC)