# Talk:SMS Meteor (1890)

This review is transcluded from Talk:SMS Meteor (1890)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Dank (talk · contribs) 17:04, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
Review

"an aviso, of the Imperial German Navy": no comma
" Her keel was laid in 1888, she was launched in January 1890, and completed in May 1891.": nonparallel; one fix is to replace the first comma by a semicolon
"She served in this capacity through World War I and after the German defeat, was sold for scrapping in 1919.": A little better would be:  She served in this capacity through World War I. After the German defeat, the ship was sold for scrapping in 1919.
"p. 814": de-italicize
Otherwise:
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose):  b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): 

It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 

It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 

It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 

It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 

Overall:
Pass/Fail: 
- Dank (push to talk) 18:56, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
Can you tell I copied that first line in all of the articles of this series when I created the stubs? Everything should be fixed. Parsecboy (talk) 16:59, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
Passed - Dank (push to talk) 19:48, 26 June 2013 (UTC)