# Talk:WASP-13

This review is transcluded from Talk:WASP-13/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: I will review this article against the good article criteria. Tyrol5 [Talk] 20:44, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Nicely written article, an interesting read.
Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality: 

B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists: 

Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources: 
I'm having issues with reference #1; the abstract does not appear to supply cited information. 
B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary: 

C. No original research: 
I've no reason to suspect OR, but I can't seem to find cited info in ref #1. 
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects: 

B. Focused: 

Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias: 

Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc: 

Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales: 

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions: 
N/A; No images used in article.
Overall:
Pass or Fail: 
Article, overall, looks good to me. Will wait until I hear from you on the journal reference. On hold for seven days. Tyrol5 [Talk] 20:59, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
I've found the PDF and resolved the issue. Everything looks good; glad to list as good article. Tyrol5 [Talk] 21:42, 26 August 2011 (UTC)