# Talk:Revox B215

This review is transcluded from Talk:Revox B215/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: JPxG (talk · contribs) 08:40, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
I'll do my best!

I have done some minor copyediting on the article. There are a couple things that I did not want to mess with myself, though:

so each of six adjustments takes up only eight elementary measurements: This kind of confuses me, and I'm not sure what it says. Could it be explained more?
Additionally, I found another possible source for the B710:

"On the other hand, single-case, separate-gap heads can achieve state-of-the-art performance, as witness the excellent Revox B710 MkII and Teac Z-6000, both of which are certainly among today's top performers." - TAPE EQUIPMENT: STATE OF THE ART, Craig Stark, page 44, Stereo Review (March 1984).
(I see you listed this as a reference, but put in the Tape Recording and Buying Guide; either this was a typo or it was in the Guide as well as the March 84 issue).
The main thing that grabs me here is the weird websites that seem to have very similar text to some parts of this article, specifically paragraphs like "The B signal path was designed, from the ground up, for operation with Dolby C noise reduction". I will have to get a more astute person than me to help figure out what is going on with this.
jp×g 01:05, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

Update: confirmed that there are no copyright violations. Passing. jp×g 07:11, 8 March 2021 (UTC)