# Talk:Zesh Rehman

I just thought I'd say Zesh isn't the first muslim to play in the premier league, plenty of players from muslim countries, morocco, algeria egypt etc have already played for clubs.  Zeshan is the first British-Pakistani to play for a club.

Possibly also the first British-born Muslim - almost certainly the first to be born a Muslim (perhaps there are British-born converts in the league?)--MartinUK (talk) 00:24, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

This section contains too much original research (or POV) and should be modified. I don't think it is very encyclopedic to say that his lack of England U-21 call-ups was a "kick in the teeth". Jogurney 21:21, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

Done Suprah™ 14:00, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

Maybe add somewhere that he blogs for setanta sports?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by KaleemMyster (talk • contribs) 02:29, 25 January 2009 (UTC) 

Surely he no longer blogs for Setanta Sports as that company no longer exists? --Allanlewis (talk) 13:49, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

I've added about 8 or so sources to help. I'm new to this so forgive me. Spiderone (talk) 17:00, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

I'll add a few more citations to the QPR section as it is largely unsourced. Spiderone (talk) 09:00, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Zesh Rehman/GA2. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Wugapodes (talk · contribs) 04:25, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

Will review. Wugapodes (talk) 04:25, 6 January 2016 (UTC)


### Checklist
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors: 
see comments 2 and 4
B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists: 

Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. Has an appropriate reference section: 
see comments 5 and 6
B. Cites reliable sources, where necessary: 

C. No original research: 

Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects: 

B. Focused (see summary style): 

Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias: 
see comment 3 and possibly 4
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc: 

Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content: 

B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions: 

Overall:
Pass or Fail: 


### Comments
If the comment is numbered, it must be addressed for the article to pass, if it is bulleted, it's an optional suggestion or comment that you don't need to act on right now.When I quote things, you can use ctrl+f to search the page for the specific line I quoted.

"inspires the next generation of [British] Asian footballers." Why is "British" in brackets?
Appropriately edited. RRD13 দেবজ্যোতি (talk) 07:36, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
"placed on the transfer list following a disciplinary matter." What was the matter? It seems from the source that it was about comments made earlier. What were the comments?
DoneRRD13 দেবজ্যোতি (talk) 07:36, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
"defending admirably" this is puffery that should be avoided.
DoneRRD13 দেবজ্যোতি (talk) 07:36, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
The use of quotes, particularly the pull quote, is problematic. The information could and should be better incorporated through paraphrasing or is not particularly important. They seem to be Rehman's opinions on the moves and are dropped without comment which isn't very useful. Further, they cause a break from the encyclopedic tone, and pull quotes contribute to a non-neutral tone. (see WP:QUOTEFARM)
Done RRD13 দেবজ্যোতি (talk) 07:36, 8 January 2016 (UTC) - removed them as they are unimportant. (I am positive to this.) Ikhtiar H (talk) 13:47, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
Footnote 4 needs to be fixed as it seems to be missing a parameter.
Done. RRD13 দেবজ্যোতি (talk) 07:36, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

A number of citations need to be edited so that the dates are consistent.
Done RRD13 দেবজ্যোতি (talk) 09:02, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

The last image is very low quality. I would recommend against using it.
Done RRD13 দেবজ্যোতি (talk) 09:02, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Wugapodes Have a look. RRD13 দেবজ্যোতি (talk) 09:02, 8 January 2016 (UTC)


### Results
On hold for 7 days pending revisions.

Listed Looks good! Thanks for the contribution, and keep up the hard work! Wugapodes (talk) 04:22, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Zesh Rehman. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20150601175928/http://www.givemefootball.com/scottish-premier-league/after-a-disappointing-summer-zesh-has-high-hopes-f to http://www.givemefootball.com/scottish-premier-league/after-a-disappointing-summer-zesh-has-high-hopes-f
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 20:37, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Zesh Rehman. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120724200725/http://www.srtrc.org/about/hall-of-fame?page=6 to http://www.srtrc.org/about/hall-of-fame?page=6
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:18, 21 December 2017 (UTC)