# Talk:Savaric FitzGeldewin

This review is transcluded from Talk:Savaric FitzGeldewin/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Starting review.Pyrotec (talk) 13:59, 3 May 2009 (UTC)


### review
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality: 

B. MoS compliance: 

Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources: 

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary: 

C. No original research: 

Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects: 

B. Focused: 

Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias: 

Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc: 

Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales: 
No images
B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions: 
No images
Overall:
Pass or Fail: 

Congratulations on the quality of the article, I'm awarding GA status.Pyrotec (talk) 10:20, 4 May 2009 (UTC)