# Talk:Williams Arcade's Greatest Hits

All of the information about the Saturn version of this game is incorrect. Bubbles is included on the disc (citation: http://www.lukiegames.com/assets/images/Saturn/SAT_WILLIAMS_ARCADES_GREATEST_HITS.jpg) and the games are all emulated (citation: http://segaretro.org/Midway_Presents_Arcade's_Greatest_Hits), with the same debug modes and bonus content as what's available in the Playstation version. I hope that these were honest mistakes, and not evidence of bias on the part of the Wikipedia member who edited this page. -anon  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.198.88.175 (talk) 03:15, 7 November 2013 (UTC) 

This review is transcluded from Talk:Williams Arcade's Greatest Hits/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: Guyinblack25 (talk · contribs) 21:42, 18 June 2025 (UTC)
Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 10:45, 23 June 2025 (UTC)

Will review this soon. Jaguar (talk) 10:45, 23 June 2025 (UTC)

Lead
"early arcade games from the golden age of arcade video games" - Golden age of arcade video games needs to be linked!
" the compilation was ported to numerous console systems" - a link to port is useful
Curious that the lead omits the original release year. This needs to be mentioned
" Defender II, the former title's updated follow up" - condense to sequel
Body
remaking the source code for contemporary hardware requires programmers to reproduce every idiosyncrasy from the original" - should this be in past tense? Or is the difficulty still present today?
"...and Robotron to play on the Super Nintendo Entertainment System" - since this is the section mention of the console, abbreviate it as SNES
"Developers from Iguana Entertainment ranked the PlayStation port as their number six most wanted game" - as their sixth most wanted game
Another sterling article; well-written, comprehensive and well sourced. Once those minor nitpicks are out of the way we can get this promoted.  Jaguar (talk) 14:37, 23 June 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for the feedback. I believe I addressed all your concerns. Regarding the verb tense, yes, if a developer were to recreate an old arcade game today, they would have to reproduce every aspect and account for the difference in hardware. Even with using the emulation, games will play differently because current hardware can run the game faster, which messes with the difficulty balance. Developers back then were aware of the game slowdown and designed accordingly. (Guyinblack25 talk 15:45, 23 June 2025 (UTC))
Thank you for addressing quickly, and clarifying. It's useful to know the verb tense was correct in the first place. This article clearly meets the criteria, so will be keen to promote.  Jaguar (talk) 16:00, 23 June 2025 (UTC)