# Talk:Replaceable You

If anyone is interesting in working on this article, then there is an interview with Jane Lynch here.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Replaceable You/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Ruby2010 (talk · contribs) 18:58, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose):  b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): 

It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 

It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 

It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 

It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 

Overall:
Pass/Fail: 


### Comments
"Bart and Martin enlist the aid of Professor Frink who then enlists a larger group of nerds to remotely hack into the robot software and make them nice again. " Switch it up a little
"The episode has received mixed reviews from television critics. " -> "Replaceable You" has...
Why is ref 8 in italics?
Good critical reception and production sections. Plot is also well-written. The reliability of this source gave me cause for concern before I saw that it was an audio recording (which I believe is fine). I see there's been a few IP edits lately, but you have done a good job fighting the erosion of this article. Hope you keep it on your watchlist! Happy to pass this one as a good article (with the belief that you'll fix the above 3 comments). Nice work, Ruby 2010/2013 19:26, 13 December 2011 (UTC)

All done! Thanks for the review! :) Theleftorium (talk) 20:12, 13 December 2011 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Replaceable You. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111211060242/http://foxallaccess.blogs.fox.com/2011/11/06/it-was-a-family-affair-for-jane-lynch-watching-the-simpsons/ to http://foxallaccess.blogs.fox.com/2011/11/06/it-was-a-family-affair-for-jane-lynch-watching-the-simpsons/
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111112175222/http://www.ology.com/tv/simpsons-recap-replaceable-you to http://www.ology.com/tv/simpsons-recap-replaceable-you
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:15, 19 June 2017 (UTC)