# Talk:The Tale of the Pie and the Patty-Pan

This review is transcluded from Talk:The Tale of the Pie and the Patty-Pan/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: -- Cirt (talk) 19:04, 3 November 2010 (UTC)

I will review this article. -- Cirt (talk) 19:04, 3 November 2010 (UTC)


### Successful good article nomination
I am glad to report that this article nomination for good article status has been promoted. This is how the article, as of November 5, 2010, compares against the  six good article criteria:

1. Well written?: Writing is generally good enough for WP:GA quality. It could use a bit of copyediting for flow, readability, and a rare comment but in some places actually seems too succinct - would suggest contacting WP:GOCE, relevant WikiProject talk pages, and doing a peer review, going forward.
2. Factually accurate?: Duly cited throughout.
3. Broad in coverage?: Very interesting stuff, I especially like the in-depth sect, Development and publication. I would highly suggest expanding the sect, Scholarly commentaries - perhaps even double or triple in size, with other secondary source coverage.
4. Neutral point of view?: Appears to be neutral, yes.
5. Article stability? No major issues upon inspection of article edit history, or talk page.
6. Images?: 7 images used, all seem to be free use on this project, or located on Wikimedia Commons. Passes here, as well.
  If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to Good article reassessment. Thank you to all of the editors who worked hard to bring it to this status, and congratulations.— -- Cirt (talk) 05:12, 5 November 2010 (UTC)

I think this section is probably largely redundant, since we have an entire biography of Beatrix Potter already; the exception is its final sentence and a half, which could be incorporated in the appropriate place within the following section "Development and Publication". Does anyone have any serious objection if the "Background" section is cut, so we can get straight to the background of the story's creation? Alfietucker (talk) 00:17, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

OK, a whole week has gone by without any objection being raised, so I'll go ahead and cut "Background". I've transferred some of its more unique information over to the main Beatrix Potter article. Alfietucker (talk) 22:31, 11 December 2011 (UTC)

This is a good article where 86% of the prose comes from LTA ItsLassieTime and their sock Susanne2009NYC. The article is listed at WP:CCI on the ItsLassieTime case. I think that this needs a careful review, but ILT has a penchant for using plenty of offline source so this may be difficult. There is a high level of copyright violations within this CCI, but I don't want this delisted sheerly for the sake of being edited by a sock and therefore subject to WP:CVREPEAT and presumptive deletion. Sennecaster (Chat) 17:37, 19 October 2021 (UTC)