# Talk:The Diving Pool

This review is transcluded from Talk:The Diving Pool/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Whiteguru (talk · contribs) 10:26, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

Starts GA Review; the review will follow the same sections of the Article.  --Whiteguru (talk) 10:26, 22 March 2021 (UTC) 

 


### Observations
### Final
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, spelling, and grammar):  b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): 
 Presenting a book sans slabs of text and excerpts is challenging. Well done, here. 

It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 Yes, links, citations to references are accurate and appropriate.

a (reference section):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):  d (copyvio and plagiarism): 
 Follows MOS; all references are reliable sources; (for a Japanese novella, well done)

It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 
 Yes, suitably broad in coverage. 

It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 
 NPOV is presented. 

It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 
 7 editors for 43 edits, 7278 page views for 60 days. A stable article is encountered. 

It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 
 Image is a book cover; qualifies as fair use for non-free images. Accepted. 

Overall:
A neat, informative presentation of Japanese novella, topic of 	Psychological horror, magical realism, surrealism. --Whiteguru (talk) 07:14, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
 Passed