# Talk:Pacific Australia Labour Mobility scheme

I've added on the following to the wikipage: Pacific Australia Labour Mobility scheme 
PALM workers are estimated to contribute approximately $184 million in taxes annually to the Australian government. This amount represents one-fifth of the $920 million that Australia has provided in support to participating Pacific nations this year.[19] itsPri (talk) 01:50, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

If you've added something it wouldn't have been a proposal...while I do not have any issue with this edit it is best that you wait for a response from another neutral editor for the future for their go ahead rather than you editing then informing later. Thanks. ManducatingMouser (talk) 07:52, 12 June 2025 (UTC)
Noted, thanks.  itsPri (talk) 23:20, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

... that almost one in three Australian meat processing workers are guest workers from the Pacific islands?

ALT1: ... that the Pacific Australia Labour Mobility scheme has been criticised for placing workers at risk of modern slavery? Source: https://www.abc.net.au/news/2024-09-23/palm-visa-scheme-exploitation-modern-slavery/104382194
Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Michael Gardener (priest)

MCE89 (talk) 13:46, 2 November 2025 (UTC).

Hook eligibility:

Cited:  - For the ALT0 hook, the source states "nearly 33% of all meat processing workers", whereas the article states "33% of its meat processing workforce" and the hook states "one in three Australian meat processing ...". Please update ALT0 and the article to accurately reflect the usage of nearly in the source.
Interesting: 

Overall:  @MCE89:, if you can update the article and ALT0 to more accurately follow the source in it's usage of the term nearly I'll approve this. TarnishedPathtalk 07:08, 3 November 2025 (UTC)

Whoops, thanks for catching that @TarnishedPath — now fixed. MCE89 (talk) 07:10, 3 November 2025 (UTC)
 Approved with a preference for ALT1. TarnishedPathtalk 07:13, 3 November 2025 (UTC)