# Talk:Xu Lai (actress)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Xu Lai (actress)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Maile66 (talk · contribs) 14:13, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors: 
Duplication Detector and Google Translate used. — Maile  (talk) 14:59, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists: 
Lead, layout, formatting in compliance. No issues with prose. Not related to fiction. Not a list. — Maile  (talk) 14:59, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. Has an appropriate reference section: 

B. Citations to reliable sources, where necessary: 
Every paragraph sourced at least once, more where necessary. — Maile  (talk) 14:59, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
C. No original research: 

Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects: 
Well balanced between acting career, personal life, and involvement in espionage activities. — Maile  (talk) 14:59, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
B. Focused: 

Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias: 

Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc: 
Zanhe has been the primary editor, with only minor edits by others. — Maile  (talk) 14:59, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are tagged with their copyright status: 
All images are on Commons and appropriately licensed. — Maile  (talk) 14:59, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions: 
Good use of images. — Maile  (talk) 14:59, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Overall:
Pass or Fail: 
Nice job on an interesting subject. — Maile  (talk) 14:59, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

Is it worth adding a filmography?♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:52, 20 June 2019 (UTC)