# Talk:Volvopluteus earlei

This review is transcluded from Talk:Volvopluteus earlei/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Seabuckthorn (talk · contribs) 18:00, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
Nominator: Sasata (talk)
Hi! I'll be reviewing this article for GA status, and should have my full review up shortly. --Seabuckthorn ♥ 18:00, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

1: Well-written

a. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors: 
b. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:  

2: Verifiable with no original research

a. Has an appropriate reference section:  Yes
b. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:  excellent (Thorough check on Google. Cross-checked with other FAs)

c. No original research:   Done

3: Broad in its coverage

4: Neutral

5: Stable: No edit wars, etc:  Yes
6: Images  Done (Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license)

As per the above checklist, the issues identified are: 

The lead does not provide an accessible overview and does not give relative emphasis.
The lead should be expanded.
The layout needs to be fixed.

This article is a very promising GA nominee. I’m glad to see your work here. All the best,  --Seabuckthorn ♥ 07:33, 25 January 2014 (UTC)\

Thank-you for your review! I have made a series of edits that I believe should address your comments above. Let me know if there are any further improvements you would like implemented. Sasata (talk) 07:44, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
Thanks  --Seabuckthorn ♥ 08:54, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
Promoting the article to GA status.  --Seabuckthorn ♥ 08:54, 27 January 2014 (UTC)