# Talk:Por Debajo de la Mesa

This review is transcluded from Talk:Por Debajo de la Mesa/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Seabuckthorn (talk · contribs) 16:32, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Nominator: Erick (talk)
Hi! My review for this article will be here shortly.  --Seabuckthorn ♥ 16:32, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

1: Well-written

a. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors: 
b. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:  

2: Verifiable with no original research

a. Has an appropriate reference section:  Yes
b. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:  excellent (Thorough check on Google. Cross-checked with other FAs – Romances & Fijación Oral, Vol. 1)

c. No original research:   Done

3: Broad in its coverage

4: Neutral

5: Stable: No edit wars, etc:  Yes
6: Images  Done (NFC with a valid FUR) 

I'm glad to see your work here. I do have some insights based on the above checklist that I think will improve the article: 

I think the lead can be improved in order to provide an accessible overview and to give relative emphasis.
Besides that, I think the article looks excellent. You've done great work, and I am quite happy to assist you in improving it. All the best,  --Seabuckthorn ♥ 10:22, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

Hmm, well it's quite common for background sections for song articles to be copied from the parent album and not be mentioned in the lead for the most part. As for the "Other recordings" in the lead, I don't personally believe in mentioning in every artist who covered and just list examples. Erick (talk) 00:34, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
Okay.  --Seabuckthorn ♥ 01:41, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
Promoting the article to GA status.  --Seabuckthorn ♥ 01:41, 5 February 2014 (UTC)