# Talk:Tanner Glass

This review is transcluded from Talk:Tanner Glass/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: AGK [•] 22:56, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose):  b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): 
Concisely written article. No prose or language errors came across during review.
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 
Meets WP:V; no obvious factual errors or content of questionable accuracy.
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 
Covers all aspects of the subject matter in adequate depth.
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 
Satisfies WP:NPOV
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 
No ongoing edit wars or substantial expansion of the article. Incident is not a current one and is not rapidly unfolding.
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 
Sparse but adequate use of images.
Overall:
Pass/Fail: 
I like how well this article flows: it gives good, progressive coverage of his entire career, supplemented by the career statistics and personal life sections. I'm happy to grant this article GA status. AGK [•] 22:56, 7 March 2011 (UTC)