# Talk:Willow Grove Park Mall

This review is transcluded from Talk:Willow Grove Park Mall/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Harrison49 (talk) 12:53, 24 May 2011 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose):  b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): 
The article is well written and maintains a good style throughout.
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 
The article is well referenced, with plenty of citations.
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 
It covers the major aspects of the subject.
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 
The article maintains a neutral point of view.
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 
The article does not appear to be subject to edit warring.
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 
Images are freely licenced and used well.
Overall: Good work. For future improvement, look to try and increase the size of the Economic impact section with more figures. Harrison49 (talk) 14:08, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
Pass/Fail: 

Apologies for the confusion in my edit which cited the Mall's having been sold once more.  The subject of the article was a shopping center, not the mall. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 13:55, 21 December 2011 (UTC)