# Talk:Quarter Pony

This review is transcluded from Talk:Quarter pony/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: GreatOrangePumpkin (talk · contribs) 15:44, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose):  b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): 

It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 

It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 

It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 

It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 

Overall:
Pass/Fail: 

This very small article (tagged as good article) relies heavily on content differentiating three registries. However, the American Quarter Pony Association seems defunct now, the National Quarter Pony Association no longer has a website and has a very small Facebook footprint, and only the International Quarter Pony Association remains active and online. I will be moving the other 2 registry content into the 'breed history' section. Apparently some merges also took place including the World Quarter Pony Registry (WQPR). I'll see what I can do.    ▶ I am Grorp ◀  15:36, 2 November 2025 (UTC)

I have drastically updated the article to reflect changes in the last 10-15 years since the article was predominantly written and the GA was placed. I do not believe it still qualifies, nor should it with all the changes. However, I am loath to install yet one more script in order to launch a WP:GAR, nor am I willing to take it through the GAR. Just notifying users here in case anyone else has the GAR-script installed.    ▶ I am Grorp ◀  18:31, 2 November 2025 (UTC)