# Talk:The Converted Deacon

This review is transcluded from Talk:The Converted Deacon/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 15:30, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

I'll another one again if you don't mind! JAGUAR  15:30, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguations: No links found.
Linkrot: No linkrot found in this article.


### Checking against GA criteria
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar):  b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): 
I would recommend cutting the lead into two paragraphs to make the lead more balanced, per WP:LEAD
Why is "Independent" capitalised in the lead?
"Though the reviewer in the The New York Dramatic Mirror however disagreed that the premise was plausible" - I would cut "however" and add a semi-colon at the end before the quote
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 

It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 

It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 

It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 

Overall:
Pass/Fail: 

A solid and well researched article with no major problems that would make this to be put on hold. JAGUAR  17:20, 29 May 2015 (UTC)