# Talk:Resident Evil Zero

Will this game ever come out on PS2?
I hope so because I'm getting tired of waiting foe the Gamecube to get cheaper. I hear you brother!

I think no--hottie 14:25, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
Gamecube costs 30 pounds second hand. That's cheap.
Yeah what the fuck?Gamecube's fucking cheap!It's like only 20 bucks now!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.100.151.129 (talk) 23:11, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
Or buy a Wii if the game will be released on Europe or USA.  21:05, 1 February 2008 (Brazilian Time)
Well, that comment was made way back in 2005... 'course it's cheaper now..  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.74.161.9 (talk) 20:53, 27 June 2009 (UTC) 

                    not for ps2 but I heard it is for the ps3 or at least is going to be

An interesting fact... In the intro for this game, it mentions Raccoon City, Rockfort Island, and interestingly enough Sheena Island from the Survivor series of games. Should the Survivor games be considered canon to the RE saga?

RE0, along with RE2, RECV and the Gun Survivor games were all written by Flagship/Noboru Sugimura, which constructed their own continuity for the series. The only ones written in-house by Capcom were the original, RE3 and RE4. Jonny2x4 04:38, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

Resident Evil 0 is just a game to tell you ansers to some of the re games that take place after zero.
And the gun survivor is a spinoff cuz its a frist person shooter.

Just because RE:Survivor is a first-person-shooter does not mean it is spin-off. It is connected to the main story-line, so no, it is not a spin-off.
It is. It's exactly the other way round. Just because it's connected to the main storyline doesn't mean it's NOT a spin-off. If something is canon or not doesn't determine if something is also considered a spin-off or not. For example, in television, you often get spin-off series as well. Those are part of the main series canon but still considered a spin-off, because they spun-off the main series =P (i.e. Stargate Atlantis being the spin-off of Stargate SG-1, both part of the canon). 84.134.191.11 (talk) 11:27, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
I'm fixing and putting as much info as possible on the resident evil franchise based on some interesting sites i'm checking out so "PLEAASSEE" don't erase them !I'm working as much as possible on it when i have time.right now I'm putting all release info based on this site http://www.crimson-ceremony.net/lostreleases/index2.htmlPaPiRiCoSuAvE (talk) 16:40, 5 October 2008 (UTC) October 5,2008

These 2 sections appear to contain the same information. I propose that production history is deleted as development history has more information contained in it.

"Upon entering the lab the Security Room, Elevator A-2, and the shutter to the Main Shaft, can not be used or entered because the Main Shaft may of been frozen at the time or because the doors might have been locked and sealed shut because of ice or because the other side requires a card key. The Security Office door may have been locked and requires the Master Key, which was used on the LeonB/ClaireB on Resident Evil 2."The above quote needs to be fixed up before it goes back (if at all). I'm removing it from the main article for now. --Thaddius 16:01, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

can someone indent it please? --65.87.242.28 (talk) 08:30, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

The game has been out for about a week now. How do we not have more info on it? Could somebody please check Famitsu for their score of the game? Or if it allows for more than 1 controller configuration like RE4? And what (if any) new Wii features there are? Just wondering.Zabbethx (talk) 19:42, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

We already did have the info. it's just it kept getting reverted by users who didn't know.OsirisV (talk) 10:28, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
IGN UK gave it a pretty crap rating (for obvious reasons). Somebody should put it in the article. Sorry I don't have a link.Zabbethx (talk) 17:40, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
Someone add in the Australian release date please? I see it on shelves in Melbourne.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.110.104.180 (talk) 08:40, 30 January 2010 (UTC) 

What the hell is wrong with this page? It's a stub, for one, and someone completely ruined the plot section. It looks like it was typed by a 12 year old.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.142.173.22 (talk) 10:22, 30 September 2011 (UTC) 
The whole page is wrong the origonal version of RE0 was on nintendo 64 and it is cannon  with RE1 ( directors cut), RE2, RE3, RE4, and 5, and 6 will be main cannon  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.106.241.162 (talk) 16:35, 25 May 2012 (UTC) 

I was about to promote the article to C-Class until I saw the Reception section. As the tag notes, this section requires expansion. One sentence to say it did well doesn't work. You have 14 review scores in the box (with 4 being for the Wii version). Look at the those reviews and make a section highlighting the stuff they praised and criticized. You don't have to use all 14 of them, just enough to get 2 or 3 paragraphs. Also, the section under Reception titled "Wii version" should be made a sub-section of Reception. That first paragraph should be incorporated into a Release section, which the article is also lacking. 
I see that you have put release info in "GameCube revival and release". You should take release dates, anything that may need noted for the release, and that first paragraph of the "Wii version" section and make a Release section right before Reception. Look to other articles for help, such as current C-Class articles and anything rated higher. Also, find a source for Gameplay, and anything unsourced (there are some unsourced sections but Gameplay has a tag). For Gameplay, you can cite the game's manual or strategy guide. For this assessment, I'm only going to require a source for Gameplay to get rid of that tag.
Expand the Reception, make a Release section, and find sources and this will be C-Class. Let me know (on my talk) that you've done those and I'll take another look. -JDC808 (talk) 04:40, 11 August 2012 (UTC)

These have been moved here from a subpage as part of a cleanup process. See Wikipedia:Discontinuation of comments subpages.
I think the page looks like it has - or is close to achieving- the requirements for a B-class article. However, I think the Plot needs a bit more work done and a solution be found to the "T" vs. "t" edits, personally I suggest using "tyrant virus".-- OsirisV (talk) 00:41, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Resident Evil Zero. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.computerandvideogames.com/79685/interviews/interview-capcom-chief-lifts-resident-evil-0-lid/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 08:26, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Resident Evil Zero/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: ProtoDrake (talk · contribs) 21:10, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

If I'm not back by Thursday with comments/full review, ping me. --ProtoDrake (talk) 21:10, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

@TarkusAB: After looking through the article and its references, I've decided that any edits are too minor to merit holding up my decision. Any edits that needed making I've made myself. I'm giving this article the go-ahead. --ProtoDrake (talk) 10:53, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 7 external links on Resident Evil Zero. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.computerandvideogames.com/79685/interviews/interview-capcom-chief-lifts-resident-evil-0-lid/
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.1up.com/features/gaming-dirty-secret
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.1up.com/do/reviewPage?cId=3058998&p=5&sec=REVIEWS
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.allgame.com/cg/agg.dll?p=agg&sql=1%3A38452
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.allgame.com/game.php?id=69009
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.officialnintendomagazine.co.uk/14744/reviewsresident-evil-archives-zero-review/
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20161201214236/http://www.capcom.co.jp/ir/english/finance/million.html to http://www.capcom.co.jp/ir/english/finance/million.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:02, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Resident Evil Zero. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140330142515/http://www.ign.com/articles/1999/01/08/n64-enters-the-world-of-survival-horror to http://uk.ign64.ign.com/articles/066/066338p1.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:45, 31 December 2017 (UTC)