# Talk:Secrets That I Never Want to Know

It appears that User:P0PP4B34R732 accidentally started a GA review, or commented, without realising that they had started a review, so I had GA1 deleted. Jezhotwells (talk) 11:20, 4 November 2011 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Secrets That I Never Want to Know/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Ruby2010 (talk · contribs) 05:58, 2 December 2011 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose):  b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): 

It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 

It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 

It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 

It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 

Overall:
Pass/Fail: 


### Comments
There is one deadlink
"Desperate Housewives focuses on the lives of several residents..." Several?
"...who tells him that he will only be forgiven if he turns himself in;..." Insert bolded
"The episode is only one of two season premieres Cherry did not write himself, as he took on a reduced production role for the eighth season in order to develop a new series while Daily was given more creative authority.[14]" Insert bolded?
The last two sentences in the ratings paragraph are a little confusing. Are you talking about Pan Am or Desperate Housewives?
"The episode received mixed to positive critical reviews." -> "Secrets That I Never Want to Know" received mixed to positive critical reviews.
"generally positive" or "mixed to positive" reviews?
"...From the funny car theft scene to the ... housewives swim only scene, ..." I know this is a partial quote, but what does the bolded mean? Would it be more clear with the full quote?
"TV Fanatic's Christina Tran gave the episode a positive review, giving it 4 out of 5 stars.[25] " giving -> handing out?
"She also appreciated the writers' decision not to prolong Tom..." She -> Tran
Almost flawless referencing. Only issue: Ref 6: add date (7/18/2008)
Great, great article. But then again, your articles are always well written and sourced. Only minor issues above, and then I'll be happy to pass this one. Ruby 2010/2013 06:54, 2 December 2011 (UTC)

Looks good. All changes have been addressed, so pass for GA. Nice work! Ruby 2010/2013 05:02, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Secrets That I Never Want to Know. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111002162113/http://www.rbr.com/tv-cable/tv-cable_ratings/week-1-abc-takes-no-2-post-w-strong-female-demo.html to http://www.rbr.com/tv-cable/tv-cable_ratings/week-1-abc-takes-no-2-post-w-strong-female-demo.html
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111014041816/http://abc.go.com/shows/desperate-housewives/episode-detail/secrets-that-i-never-want-to-know/854057 to http://abc.go.com/shows/desperate-housewives/episode-detail/secrets-that-i-never-want-to-know/854057
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:31, 19 June 2017 (UTC)