# Talk:Papers (song)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Papers (song)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: S Masters (talk) 08:56, 24 April 2010 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose):  b (MoS): 

It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 

It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 

It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 

It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 

Overall:
Pass/Fail: 

Comments:

"Buzz single" is industry jargon and should be explained. Fixed
Sean Garrett is mentioned twice in the second paragraph. Fixed, I think. He was mentioned twice because the last paragraph deals mostly with composition but techincally it is still background information, so I didn't split it. However I removed his first name from the second mentioning.
This is the sentence I'm referring to (second paragraph): "It was written by Usher, Sean Garrett, Alonzo Mathis, Sean Garrett and Zaytoven, and was produced by the latter two." -- S Masters (talk) 15:12, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
Other than the above, the article has no major issues.

Oops, I thought you mean second paragraph of Background. Fixed now! Candyo32 (talk) 23:02, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
Summary: Thank you for all the fixes. I am confident that the article now meets all the requirements for a Good Article, and I am happy to list it as such. -- S Masters (talk) 04:28, 25 April 2010 (UTC)