# Talk:The Ghost Ship

The "haunted/cursed ship" aspect is only indirectly suggested, let alone developed, and there's no ambiguity about what's going on -- the captain is nuts -- though in a complex and psychologically interesting way. He's one of several complex villains in the Lewton films. This is not a horror film. WilliamSommerwerck (talk) 15:42, 28 August 2010 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:The Ghost Ship/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Thine Antique Pen (talk · contribs) 15:22, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
I will review. ⇒TAP 15:22, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

Not much I can see, however in the lead it says 'The ship's crew, however, believes the vessel to ...' — believes ⇒ believed? ⇒TAP 15:23, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
For films we talk in the present tense as the story still exists! Believes is correct I believe!♦ Dr. Blofeld 16:17, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose):  b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): 

It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 

It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 

It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 

It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 

Overall:
Pass/Fail: 

An image taken as a screenshot shows the kind of ship that was involved, partly cargo, partly passenger ship, a kind of "tramp" steamer that was most often seen in the 1930s and has now virtually disappeared. There is no other image available of this ship as all other images show interior views or deck, pilot house or steam stack only. It is used for illustrative purposes and has a non-free rationale provided. FWiW  Bzuk (talk) 01:24, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

I looked this film up and it says that this is also in the horror genre as well so shouldn't it be a part of WikiProject Horror?--Paleface Jack (talk) 19:37, 19 April 2017 (UTC)