# Talk:The Dragon and the Doctor

This review is transcluded from Talk:The Dragon and the Doctor/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 23:37, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Hey, I'm going to be reviewing this article. Expect comments by the end of the week. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 23:37, 26 March 2021 (UTC)


### Basic stuff and comments
Improve the non-free use rationale for the image with this template.
That being said, the infobox looks good.
Lead summarizes the entire article so no problems there.
Plot section looks good as well.
Couldn't find any issues in #Writing or #Reception.
However, I would add another subsection/header to #References. You can decide which one (see example 1 and example 2).
With that in mind, references themselves are in great shape. 


### Progress
Thanks Some Dude From North Carolina! I've addressed both points; let me know if there's any other work you think this article would benefit from. Kindly —Collint c 17:03, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
@Bobamnertiopsis: The non-free use rationale was not improved. You can simply do this by copy-and-pasting the template and filling in several key parameters including the article, use, author, and source. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 17:27, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
@Some Dude From North Carolina: Aha, I understand now. Added! —Collint c 17:44, 28 March 2021 (UTC)