# Talk:Princess Twilight Sparkle (My Little Pony: Friendship Is Magic episodes)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Princess Twilight Sparkle (My Little Pony: Friendship Is Magic episodes)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: TeenAngels1234 (talk · contribs) 15:25, 13 March 2022 (UTC)

I'm gonna review this. Stay tuned.--TeenAngels1234 (talk) 15:25, 13 March 2022 (UTC)

Isn't there a summary presentation of the main roles of the crew? Like "X wrote the episode, while X handled the storyboard".
I don't really think this is necessary, because they can only be sourced to primary sources (either the show itself or tweets)
The part about Mary Jane Begin seems to have little connection to what was written earlier. I suggest first introducing the creatures outside of the Plot section, (e.g. "the evil dragon Discord") and making if possible a prosaic link to what was written before.
Isn't there some other review on these episodes? Even a third opinion would be helpful.
There are several reviews from fansites, but I have refrained from adding those per MOS:TVRECEPTION.​ Pamzeis (talk) 03:25, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
@Pamzeis: That's all.TeenAngels1234 (talk) 19:12, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
Is it well written?
A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct: 

B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation: 

Is it verifiable with no original research?
A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline: 

B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines: 
C. It contains no original research: 

D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism: 

Is it broad in its coverage?
A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic: 
B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style): 

Is it neutral?
It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each: 
Is it stable?
It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute: 

Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content: 

B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions: 

Overall:
Pass or Fail: 
Brief summa. The article itself is considerably brief, but it still looks complete, since we're talking about two cartoon episodes with no huge cultural impact or complicated production. Passing.--TeenAngels1234 (talk) 19:12, 15 March 2022 (UTC)