# Talk:Robert K. A. Gardiner

[1]
[2]
-Indy beetle (talk) 21:33, 1 July 2018 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Robert K. A. Gardiner/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Guettarda (talk · contribs) 14:50, 23 March 2019 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, spelling, and grammar):  b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): 

It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):  d (copyvio and plagiarism): 

It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 

It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 

It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 

Overall:
Pass/Fail: 

This is really nice work Indy beetle. You handled the conflicting and incomplete sources well. It's an important article in an area where Wikipedia's coverage could stand to be a lot better. My only suggestion would be this sentence: His father died when he was two years old, and one of his siblings also died. It just feels too dry - maybe something like "and one of his siblings died before adulthood". But that's far too minor an issue to stop promotion. Guettarda (talk) 15:40, 23 March 2019 (UTC)

@Guettarda: Thank you for the review. I have implemented the recommended change. -Indy beetle (talk) 19:52, 23 March 2019 (UTC)