# Talk:The Watch (2012 film)

I couldn't help but notice (and nitpick) about what was on the lapels of the police officers in the movie. I couldnt see it crisply, but it looked like the seal of the state of Maryland. Am I wrong? I know it definitely isn't Ohio's seal, and I couldn't find one for Glenview.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 100.44.55.193 (talk) 22:52, 2 August 2012 (UTC) 

This review is transcluded from Talk:The Watch (2012 film)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Miniapolis (talk · contribs) 16:19, 30 November 2012 (UTC)


### Over-citation?
In copyediting the article, I noticed four citations in a row for Ben Stiller's character in the "Cast" section. Per WP:OVERCITE#How to trim excessive citations, perhaps the least-valuable reference should be removed (I find more than three footnotes in a row to be clutter). All the best, Miniapolis (talk) 16:19, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

I'll take a look when you're finished copy editing, I don't want to cause you an edit conflict. I think the problem was each source carried a part of the info but not all, but I'll double check. Darkwarriorblake (talk) 17:22, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
Done . Darkwarriorblake (talk) 00:56, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose):  b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): 

It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 

It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 

It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 

It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 

Overall:
Pass/Fail: 

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 6 external links on The Watch (2012 film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/envelope/cotown/la-et-ct-box-office-watch-dark-knight-rises-20120726%2C0%2C697006.story
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.avclub.com/articles/the-watch%2C82980/
Corrected formatting/usage for http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=%2F20120725%2FREVIEWS%2F120729983
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.ew.com/ew/article/0%2C%2C20589547%2C00.html
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/movies/moviesnow/la-et-mn-review-the-watch-20120727%2C0%2C49370.story
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120728013819/http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/the_watch_2012/ to http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/the_watch_2012/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:07, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

"with marketing and distribution costs taken into account"  The references do not contain this, where does it come from? jae (talk) 07:17, 17 August 2023 (UTC)