# Talk:Pong Tiku

He is listed as having died in 1907, yet the first paragraph talks about him escaping in 1909...
212.35.253.186 (talk) 10:16, 29 May 2012 (UTC)

Thank you, infobox is correct. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 10:28, 29 May 2012 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Pong Tiku/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: ErrantX (talk · contribs) 12:06, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
Happy to review this... there look to be only a few issues. First a template!

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose):  b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): 

It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 

It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 

It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 

It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 

Overall:
Pass/Fail: 


### Comments
First pass it looks good - I'll run through it more carefully tomorrow :) --Errant (chat!) 23:14, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
Alright, thanks for the review! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:15, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
Ok, looks good. There were a few other minor tweaks but I just went ahead and did them. Happy to sign off on this. --Errant (chat!) 09:27, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for the review and fixes! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:07, 15 June 2012 (UTC)