# Talk:Roughtail stingray

This review is transcluded from Talk:Roughtail stingray/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Sasata (talk) 00:03, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
Signing up for this review, comments later.
Once again, the article is already very good. A few comments: Sasata (talk) 02:03, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

"…and in the northwestern Atlantic, where it is not utilized." add "commercially"?
Done
the prologue appears to be available on Google books
Prologue of what?
Sorry, I meant the protologue :)
Ref+link added
link disjunct
Done
"densely encrustated" is this spelling intentional or should it be encrusted?
Fixed
define/link sinuous
Linked to Wiktionary
"Polypocephalus sp." singular (sp.) or plural (spp.)?
Singular, as I believe it's undescribed
link demersal
Done
"Anecdotal reports suggest that landings of this species are decreasing" What does "landings" mean?
Linked to Fisheries glossary
dab papilla
Added definition and unlinked, since there's no good article for this anyway
Let me know of further issues. -- Yzx (talk) 02:44, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
This article meets all the GA criteria: Sasata (talk) 05:20, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose):  b (MoS): 
Well written, complies with MoS.
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c(OR): 
Well-cited to reliable sources.
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 
Similar to other stingray GAs.
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars etc.: 

It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Six images, all PD or with free-use licenses.
Overall:
Pass/Fail: 

Thanks! -- Yzx (talk) 05:34, 1 April 2010 (UTC)