# Talk:Si Tú Te Vas (Enrique Iglesias song)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Si Tú Te Vas (Enrique Iglesias song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20130617002401/http://www.billboard.com:80/charts/1996-01-13/latin-songs to http://www.billboard.com/charts/1996-01-13/latin-songs
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 00:55, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Si Tú Te Vas (Enrique Iglesias song)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: The Rambling Man (talk · contribs) 12:07, 10 September 2021 (UTC)

Comments

"and Roberto Morales" as there's no link for Morales, even in the lead I think you should give some context that he was a friend of Iglesias.
"He recorded" Iglesias recorded...
"and led to Iglesias being" the video led to that nomination, not the song?
"song a favorable review while one reviewer was not impressed" I would say this classifies as mixed reviews.  Were there literally just three reviews in total of this song, ever?
"an ASCAP Latin" can we expand ASCAP before abbreviating it, some of our non-US readers may not know that abbreviation.
"One of the songs Iglesias co-wrote" presumably "they co-wrote" or even, to avoid repeating, "they wrote together"?
" $4,000 " inflate, 25 years or so ago is long enough to consider understanding this was a pretty big "loan" from the nanny!
"Hollywood.[11][12]It features" space before It.
"e.[11][12]. " no full stop after those refs.
"1996 ASCAP Latin Awards" see above.
"weeks on this position" at, not on.
"Morales being receiving an" being awarded, or simply "receiving", but not a combo of both.
That's all I have for this one.  The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 19:53, 10 September 2021 (UTC)

The Rambling Man, Hey TRM. The MTV nom was for the video so I figured it'd make sense to mention the video being the reason for it. Surprisingly, the actual thoughts from music journalists was pretty low and hard to find. Often when the song was mentioned on other reviews of its parent album not mentioned here, it just mentions the song being #1 on the Hot Latin Songs chart, which isn't useful commentary for an opinion. Everything else has been pretty much addressed and I think I got inflation part right. Erick (talk) 03:01, 11 September 2021 (UTC)