# Talk:Washington State Route 96

I removed the following because it was uncited, and I couldn't find anything at WSDOT relating to it.

-- Kéiryn talk 06:31, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Washington State Route 96/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: TCN7JM (talk · contribs) 05:40, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
I have yet to review Maryland Route 10, but I'll get to this one immediately after that one. Probably tomorrow. –TCN7JM 05:40, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
Lead

SR 96 in parentheses should probably be bolded. I don't know why I haven't noticed this in any of the other articles I've reviewed from you.
✗ Per dispute at WT:USRD
Route description

Not sure suburban needs to be linked. City center is also questionable, but I can see where context is needed there.
 Un-linked
You've got a least busiest again.
 Changed to "least busy"
History

Turning lanes and traffic camera definitely don't need to be linked. The first just redirects to lane and the second is obvious in context.
 Un-linked
Major intersections

Should there not be a comma between Vancouver and BC?
✗ According to WSDOT SrWeb, it's marked as Vancouver BC (sans the comma).
Okay, this one is going  on hold for you to fix stuff. Overall, it's a good article. –TCN7JM 18:01, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

Responded to every problem, not sure how to solve the first until a full discussion over bolding in parenthesis. SounderBruce 05:51, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
Not exactly sure how per dispute at WT:USRD is a valid reason not to bold the abbreviation, but I'll disregard that and pass the article since a lot of better articles don't have the bolding. –TCN7JM 05:56, 25 February 2013 (UTC)