# Talk:X-Men vs. Street Fighter

Reasoning: 82.34.146.56's recent edits. --elias.hc 18:43, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

The AI in this game, like many other fighters, can perform moves that require a full circle motion without jumping. <-- this is wrong, those moves actually require a 270° motion which can be performed without jumping. I will remove this wrong info from trivia

Image:X-Men VS Street Fighter.PNG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 05:11, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

As per the reassessment tag, reassessing: B-class. Some tips for improvement follow:

"Similar to Capcom's various Street Fighter titles" - link Street Fighter
"It is the first formal installment in the Marvel vs. Capcom series and is responsible for introducing dual-character selection and tag team battles to the franchise." - needs clarification; if it's the first in the series, how does it "introduce" a feature? Doesn't it "introduce" everything, since it's the first? If you meant the SF franchise, you should clarify.
"to deliver an arcade-perfect conversion.[8][5] " - ref order
Other than that, solid as always. --PresN 16:40, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:X-Men vs. Street Fighter/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 20:16, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

I'm doing a sweep. I'll take another, if that's OK. JAGUAR  20:16, 28 January 2016 (UTC)


### Initial comments
"is a crossover fighting game" - again, I'd use video game here
"it was eventually ported" - link video game porting
"For example, if Player 1 is controlling Ryu and Player 2 is controlling Wolverine, then Player 1's partner will be Wolverine and Player 2's partner will be Ryu." - why is 'player' capitalised?
I was using them as proper nouns. Is that appropriate? Wani (talk) 17:57, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
Yeah, it should be fine JAGUAR  18:07, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
IGN and Eurogamer doesn't need to be italicised in the references (optional)
Also, I noticed that the reference use year-month-date format instead of month-day-year. Nothing major though
I'd split the references into two columns
No dead links


### Close - promoted
I rarely do this, but I'm going to pass this outright as I couldn't find anything major enough to put this on hold. It is well written, comprehensive and in slightly better shape than the last. All in all, it meets the GA criteria. Well done!  JAGUAR  15:15, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 4 external links on X-Men vs. Street Fighter. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.gameinformer.com/cgi-bin/review.cgi?sys=sat&path=feb98&doc=xmsf
Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.gamepro.com/systems/saturn/sat9.html
Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.gameinformer.com/cgi-bin/review.cgi?sys=psx&path=jul98&doc=xmen
Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.edge-online.co.uk/edgedb/search.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 02:28, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on X-Men vs. Street Fighter. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20140717051434/http://www.gamespot.com:80/reviews/marvel-super-heroes-vs-street-fighter-import-revie/1900-2532883/ to http://www.gamespot.com/reviews/marvel-super-heroes-vs-street-fighter-import-revie/1900-2532883/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:23, 21 July 2016 (UTC)