# Talk:Soviet submarine S-99

This review is transcluded from Talk:Soviet submarine S-99/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Djmaschek (talk · contribs) 03:01, 8 January 2023 (UTC)


### Initial review
I plan to review this article for GA class. Overall, it looks good. Djmaschek (talk) 03:01, 8 January 2023 (UTC)


### B class review
This article meets all the criteria for B class. Djmaschek (talk) 21:15, 8 January 2023 (UTC)


### Review 1
@Sturmvogel 66: Referring to the following issues, please fix or argue your case for not fixing. Djmaschek (talk) 22:05, 8 January 2023 (UTC)

Well-written, verifiable, broad coverage, neutral, stable, illustrated.  Done
Introduction: "Soviet Union" and "submarine" are each linked twice within the introduction paragraph.
Narrative-infobox contradiction: Submerged displacement is different (1,500 t vs. 1,215 t).
Description, paragraph 1: "Draft (ship)" is in the narrative. Omit the "(ship)" part.
Infobox, Complement & Surface speed: I cannot find the crew size (51) or surface speed (11 knots) in the narrative.
Construction and career, sentence 2: "Platonov says" (Source is Pavlov, not Platonov.)
Too many Soviet destroyer articles for which Platonov is a key reference!
All done, see if my changes are satisfactory.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 22:51, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
@Sturmvogel 66: GA class. Please have a look at 1500 tonnes = 1500 long tons submerged displacement in infobox and narrative. Surface displacement (950 t = 930 LT) shows the units are different, so readers may be confused. I recommend adding round=5 parameter to convert function to make it 1500 t = 1475 LT, but you may wish to use a different rounding value. Thanks. Djmaschek (talk) 03:18, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
Good catch, done.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 14:33, 11 January 2023 (UTC)