# Talk:Robert Bloet

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 07:39, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Robert Bloet/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Starting review. Pyrotec (talk) 12:09, 11 October 2009 (UTC)


### Overall Summary
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

A comprehensive well-referenced article
Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality: 

B. MoS compliance: 

Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources: 

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary: 
Well referenced
C. No original research: 

Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects: 

B. Focused: 

Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias: 

Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc: 

Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales: 
No illustrations
B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions: 
No illustrations
Overall:
Pass or Fail: 

Congratulations on the quality of the article, I'm awarding GA status. Pyrotec (talk) 14:04, 11 October 2009 (UTC)