# Talk:Washington State Route 22

This review is transcluded from Talk:Washington State Route 22/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.


### Excellent description of the route.
It has an excellent description of the route.
Reviewer: Allforjesus2 (talk) 19:27, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
I do not disagree with the outcome of this review, but in the sake of completeness, I will do a full review of the article to confirm this. Imzadi 1979 → 22:20, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose):  b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): 
There are some minor copy edits needed to clear up the prose. I've made them myself rather than list them here.
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 

It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 

It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 

It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 

Overall:
Pass/Fail: 
As stated above, I agree with the outcome of the review, if not necessarily the process to arrive at that outcome. As such, I'm affirming the passage of the article. Imzadi 1979 → 22:51, 21 November 2010 (UTC)