# Talk:Rise (perfume)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Rise (perfume)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Jonas Vinther (talk · contribs) 14:11, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

Well-written 
a. the prose is clear and concise, it respects copyright laws, and the spelling and grammar are correct
b. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation

The article is very well-written. I was unable to find a single sentence or grammar error. Wonderful.
Verifiable with no original research 
a. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline
b. It provides in-line citations from reliable sources for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines
c. It contains no original research

This article uses online sources all of which are acceptable and contain the necessary reference or source information.
Broad in its coverage 
a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic
b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail

The article is broad in its coverage, stays on topic and does not go into unnecessary detail.
Neutral 
It represents viewpoints fairly and without bias, giving due weight to each

The article is neutral and does not include personal opinions or statements.
Stable 
It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute

The article is written by one editor and has no history of edit wars or content disputes.
Illustrated 
a. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content
b. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions

The article is illustrated with two images both of which contain the necessary status information.
Pass, fail or hold? 
This article meets the GA-criteria and I'm therefore going to pass it. Excellent job people, keep up the good work. Jonas Vinther (speak to me!) 14:31, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

Should we subject this article to peer review? Lbertolotti (talk) 15:31, 12 August 2015 (UTC)