# Talk:Ontology

The article begins with a sentence with a very clear meaning, "It (ontology) is traditionally understood as the subdiscipline of metaphysics focused on the most general features of reality." But later the article goes on to say, "Ontology is closely related to metaphysics but the exact relation of these two disciplines is disputed." What/which relationship between the two disciplines is disputed? Isn't it clear from the beginning, that one is the subdiscipline of another? Maybe this should be clarified better. Thanks. Neotaruntius (talk) 11:06, 7 April 2025 (UTC)

Hello Neotaruntius and thanks for your observation. The lead says It (ontology) is TRADITIONALLY understood as the subdiscipline of metaphysics. The definition section says A TRADITIONALLY influential characterization asserts that ontology is a subdiscipline of metaphysics.. So there is no contradition here. The difficulty is that different philosophers use different definitions of ontology. According to some definitions, like the traditional definition, ontology is a subdiscipline of metaphysics. According to others, it isn't. These details are explained in the section "Definition". They are only alluded to in the lead because these details don't belong into the lead. Phlsph7 (talk) 07:46, 8 April 2025 (UTC)