# Talk:Steve Morison

There is no factual backing for the transfer of Steve Morison from Stevenage to Millwall on either official website or official transfer window listings.
--Lpeters001 (talk) 17:21, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Steve Morison/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 17:37, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

This article is in decent shape, but it needs more work before it becomes a Good Article.
Is it well written?
A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct: 
In the Millwall section, "...whilst he supplied the cross that lead to an own goal" ---> "...whilst he supplied the cross that led to an own goal".
Check.
B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation: 
Throughout the article, please link "Christie Park", "promotion", and "The Valley" to their correspondence articles as at the moment they stand out as a disambiguations. In the lead, you have "Millwall" linked twice, you only need it linked once.
Check.
Is it verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check?
A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline: 
In References 99 and 100, "Timesonline" ---> "The Times. There seems to be problems with Refs. 16 and 18.
Check.
B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose): 

C. It contains no original research: 

D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism: 

Is it broad in its coverage?
A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic: 

B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style): 

Is it neutral?
It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each: 

Is it stable?
It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute: 

Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content: 

B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions: 

Overall:
Pass or Fail: 
Not that much to do. If the statements above can be answered, I will pass the article. Good luck!
--  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 17:37, 3 August 2010 (UTC)


### Comments
Made all of the changes, changed the links as well as 'Stevenage-Mad' were re-directing the links as you noted. Thanks. SBFCEdit (talk) 19:28, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for making the necessary changes, cause I have gone off and placed the article as GA. Congrats. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 18:33, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Steve Morison. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20120322002901/http://www.faw.org.uk/news/1815 to http://www.faw.org.uk/news/1815
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 06:19, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Steve Morison. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added {{dead link}} tag to http://194.131.180.89/2004-05reports.htm
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://194.131.180.89/old_news_apr06.htm
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090305133642/http://194.131.180.89/fixtures2006-07.htm to http://194.131.180.89/fixtures2006-07.htm
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130815064419/http://www.steveandgrantsracingclub.co.uk/how-it-works to http://www.steveandgrantsracingclub.co.uk/how-it-works/
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://194.131.180.89/fixtures2005-06.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:48, 4 January 2018 (UTC)