# Talk:Route 179 (Pennsylvania–New Jersey)

This article has failed the USRD GA audit and will be sent to WP:GAR if the issues are not resolved within one week. Please see WT:USRD for more details, and please ask me if you have any questions as to why this article failed. --Rschen7754 (T C) 05:57, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

 Done. Dough4872 (talk) 23:06, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on New Jersey Route 179. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110628183145/http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/1953_New_Jersey_state_highway_renumbering to http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/1953_New_Jersey_state_highway_renumbering
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:52, 17 February 2018 (UTC)

This article covers a state route which crosses state boundaries, but has the same number. It would be best if it was renamed to reflect this. The current name is not reflective of the article content. Famartin (talk) 05:40, 30 November 2018 (UTC)

Support - Article title would better reflect that the route runs through two states. I'm guessing this may have not been moved after PA 179 was merged into NJ 179 since most of the route is in New Jersey and therefore the Pennsylvania section was not long enough to warrant a move. Dough4872 18:47, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
Support - Combo makes sense. --WashuOtaku (talk) 18:57, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
Support. Although it should be Route 179 (Pennsylvania–New Jersey). –Fredddie™ 01:24, 1 December 2018 (UTC)
Agree with Fredddie, should be PA-NJ to reflect the south-to-north progression. Dough4872 01:59, 1 December 2018 (UTC)
I went ahead and BOLDly moved this to the new title. –Fredddie™ 04:03, 20 December 2018 (UTC)