# Talk:Ontario Highway 73

This review is transcluded from Talk:Ontario Highway 73/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Seabuckthorn (talk · contribs) 03:16, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
Nominator: Floydian τ ¢
Hi! I'll be reviewing this article for GA status, and should have my full review up shortly. --Seabuckthorn ♥ 03:16, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

1: Well-written

a. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors: .
b. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists: 

Check for WP:WTW:  None 
Check for WP:EMBED:   Done

The table is standard in such articles. Checked other FAs - Ontario Highway 401 & Ontario Highway 416

2: Verifiable with no original research

a. Has an appropriate reference section:  Yes
b. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:  very good Checked other FAs - Ontario Highway 401 & Ontario Highway 416

c. No original research:   Done

3: Broad in its coverage

4: Neutral

5: Stable: No edit wars, etc:  Yes
6: Images  Done  (PD) (Cross-checked with other FAs - Ontario Highway 401 & Ontario Highway 416.) 

As per the above checklist, the issues are:

Fix short paragraphs.

This article is a very promising GA nominee. I'm delighted to see your work here. I'm putting the article on hold. All the best! --Seabuckthorn ♥ 03:54, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

Thanks again for taking on my spamming of GAN :) I'm not sure which paragraph(s) in particular stand out... I could combine the paragraphs in the RD, but generally speaking I find the description of the route a separate idea from the "and today it is known as..." thought. - Floydian τ ¢ 06:26, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
Well, that's not spamming. That's your hard work and humility. The names and content of these articles may be similar, but the geographical location and purpose of these highways are different. I'm sure I won't need a tourist guide now to navigate roads in Ontario, if I ever happen to visit the place :).
Apologies. I kind of missed that fact. Feel free to revert it. Thanks for your polite explanation. --Seabuckthorn ♥ 16:02, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
OK, everything looks good now. Passing the article to GA status. --Seabuckthorn ♥ 16:02, 13 January 2014 (UTC)