# Talk:Russian destroyer Zabiyaka

This review is transcluded from Talk:Russian destroyer Zabiyaka/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs) 13:23, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
Reviewer: Parsecboy (talk · contribs) 16:34, 28 August 2025 (UTC)
I'll claim this one. Parsecboy (talk) 16:34, 28 August 2025 (UTC)

Do we have a translation for Uritsky and Reut (or are they somebody's name)?
Also, Reut should be bolded in the lead
Good catch. Google translate doesn't work on them, so I image that they're names of somebody or something
It's a pretty hard transition to go from repairs in 1917 to "Kassar Wiek is the western portion of Moon Sound..." It would make more sense to add a sentence or two explaining that, A, Zabiyaka had gone to the Gulf of Riga by that point, and B, the Germans were attempting to capture the gulf to consolidate gains after the Riga offensive
See how it reads now. I may have over-elaborated it.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 19:37, 30 August 2025 (UTC)
You might be able to trim it slightly, but I think it's fine, certainly for GA. A couple of dupe links crept in, but I fixed those.
Uritisky's anti-aircraft armament is augmented -> was augmented
Piping 1955 Soviet nuclear tests to the date seems a bit WP:EGGy to me - I'd probably pipe it instead to "a submerged nuclear blast"
Spot checks to 1, 4, and 13 look fine to me
Sources are high quality, formatted uniformly, etc. Parsecboy (talk) 19:41, 29 August 2025 (UTC)
Nicely done, I'm happy to promote at this point. Parsecboy (talk) 13:37, 1 September 2025 (UTC)