# Talk:Tonnerre-class ironclad

This review is transcluded from Talk:Tonnerre-class ironclad/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: Simongraham (talk · contribs) 05:49, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
Reviewer: Parsecboy (talk · contribs) 22:48, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
I'll take this one. Parsecboy (talk) 22:48, 7 November 2025 (UTC)

One dupe link
Removed.
File:Tonnerre (1875).jpg needs a US copyright tag
Added.
Fix the rounding for the main gun in the infobox
Fixed.
Remove the extraneous inch from "75.6 m (248 ft 0 in)"
Removed.
More rounding issues in the armor paragraph
Fixed.
Link waterline length, Hull (watercraft)
Linked.
What variant of English is being used here? I see "armor" and "draft" but "defence" and "metre"
Stuck to British English as that is the language of the sources.
Ropp has some useful context on the naval construction program of 1872 that led to the construction of these ships, and a bit on evaluating them in service - not necessary for GA, but worth considering for future development of the article.
Excellent idea. I will see if I can get a look at a copy.
Sources are high quality and uniformly formatted
Nicely done overall, these are mainly just nitpicks. Parsecboy (talk) 00:35, 8 November 2025 (UTC)

@Parsecboy: Thank you for your kind words and review. I believe all the changes have been made. simongraham (talk) 00:38, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
I think everything is in order, happy to promote to GA - I'm only mad that you got to these before I did (I had planned on writing these years ago when I did French ironclad Furieux) but I took too long ;) Parsecboy (talk) 13:07, 13 November 2025 (UTC)