# Talk:Special Project

Who writes these?  This episode was terrible.  I have a feeling a writer/director from The Office is doing these.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 159.53.78.140 (talk) 20:33, 10 February 2012 (UTC) 

Oh you're right. It's OBVIOUSLY some inside conspiracy. The fact that all the reviews are relatively positive is easily a red herring. Not.--76.246.176.32 (talk) 01:38, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
I'll admit, these episodes aren't funny and according to the viewership for this season there's a steady drop off.  Everywhere else I read The Office episodes are usually panned but on wiki it's usually pretty positive.  Could be an inside job.  -Qbert  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.30.215.196 (talk) 05:02, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
Every article I've ever read has given this season an B or a C, 3-3.5 out of 5 stars, etc. That's hardly "panning" a series. Panning is when you award an episode two stars, or give it a D, neither of which has happened to this series. I believe this is reflected in the articles, which HAVE passed peer-review, so its hardly an inside job. Most of the negative press has come from reviews that criticize the show for stooping to mediocrity when it was once a ground-breaking comedy. If you're unhappy, edit the article and stop proposing a conspiracy theory.--Gen. Quon (talk) 20:16, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

Someone keeps editing the article to imply that Kathy was referring to Jim and Pam's marriage when she said "Marriage is not good. Nobody knows better than me." Not only would this be reading into something that wasn't said. It doesn't make sense in two other ways. First, how would she know better than anyone else the quality of Jim and Pam's marriage? Second, we know from a deleted scene that Kathy was going to be married to someone named Doug, but for some reason, chose not to go through with it. It seems very clear to me that when she says "Marriage is not good," she is referring to her personal views based on her (failed) experiences with marriage. Does anyone disagree with my understanding of what Kathy said? Lifesaglitch (talk) 17:00, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Every review I've read interpreted the phone call to mean that Kathy was talking about Pam and Jim.--Gen. Quon (talk) 18:34, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Special Project/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Lemonade51 (talk · contribs) 18:59, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
Lead

"The episode was written by Amelie Gillette and was directed by David Rogers.", replace the bolded part with It
I suggest you reword the plot in the lead and it could do with beefing up.
Plot

"Meanwhile Jim (John Krasinski) receives..." can merit it's own paragraph.
"Erin expresses frustration that Andy is still with Jessica..." on the other hand does not, merge it.
Production

"The episode introduces a six episode arc which will feature several of the office workers working on a special project for Sabre in Tallahassee, Florida", two things: first, six-episode should be hyphenated. Secondly, the tense used is confusing, as the six episodes have been aired, should it be "which featured several of the office workers..."
Reception

"The episode originally aired" → "The episode first aired"
"Not all reviews were positive." → "However, not all reviews were positive"
References

Why is TV by the Numbers a 'work' in Ref 8 and a 'publisher' on Ref 9?
On hold for seven days. Lemonade51 (talk) 19:24, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

Although I know this isn't my GA nomination, I went ahead and fixed everything.--Gen. Quon (talk) 20:12, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Special Project. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120131041252/http://blog.zap2it.com/frominsidethebox/2012/01/the-office-ep-paul-lieberstein-on-andy-robert-catherine-tate-and-more.html to http://blog.zap2it.com/frominsidethebox/2012/01/the-office-ep-paul-lieberstein-on-andy-robert-catherine-tate-and-more.html
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120205134135/http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2012/02/03/thursday-final-ratings-american-idol-big-bang-theory-greys-anatomy-office-mentalist-adjusted-up-rob-adjusted-down/118569/ to http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2012/02/03/thursday-final-ratings-american-idol-big-bang-theory-greys-anatomy-office-mentalist-adjusted-up-rob-adjusted-down/118569/
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120625182833/http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2012/02/27/live7-dvr-ratings-modern-family-tops-absolute-ratings-gains-pan-am-tops-gains-in-week-21/122031/ to http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2012/02/27/live7-dvr-ratings-modern-family-tops-absolute-ratings-gains-pan-am-tops-gains-in-week-21/122031/
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.hollywood.com/news/The_Office_Recap_Special_Project/16519618
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:47, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Special Project. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.hollywood.com/news/The_Office_Recap_Special_Project/16519618
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120213053055/http://www.nbc.com/the-office/episode-guide/season-8/401526/special-project/episode-814/463268 to http://www.nbc.com/the-office/episode-guide/season-8/401526/special-project/episode-814/463268/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:45, 4 July 2017 (UTC)