# Talk:Sibyl Hathaway

Is it fair to say that she was not the Dame of Sark from 1940 to 1945?The Germans may have impeded her exercise of her rights,but she was lawfully entitled to the control they usurped,at all times.--Louis E./le@put.com/12.144.5.2 19:38, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Officially she did not even rule from 1929-1954 during her marriage to Robert Hathaway, but of course she still governed the island, which also continued, although restricted, during the occupation.--Hannesde Correct me! 12:46, 27 December 2007 (UTC)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hannes2 (talk • contribs) 

This review is transcluded from Talk:Sibyl Hathaway/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Rosiestep (talk · contribs) 20:27, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
I'll review this one within the week. --Rosiestep (talk) 20:27, 1 March 2014 (UTC)

OK, thanks Rosiestep. Best, Matty.007 20:32, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
Lead
"...but she kept the governmental reins in her hands" - clunky
Done. Matty.007
Add maiden name per WP:FULLNAME
Done. Matty.007
Early life
"She was born..." - I assume this refers to Sibyl but, grammatically, it refers to Sophie.
Done. Matty.007
Please sort out William Frederick Collings vs. William Frederick vs. Frederick vs. Collings.
Done. I used Collings, as that is given as her maiden name in a source. Matty.007
"the local Sercquiais dialect of Norman language" - the local Sercquiais dialect of the Norman language
Done. Matty.007
First marriage
"When the Seigneur stormed aboard looking for her the captain hid her, she travelled to the house of a relative in London." clunky
Done. Matty.007
Infobox
fine as is
Accession and remarriage
"Towards the end of his life, he stopped requesting the inhabitants to pay tithes..." - Towards the end of his life, he stopped requesting from the inhabitants the payment of tithes...
Done. Matty.007
"She used the island's peculiarity" - can you clarify how it was peculiar?
Done. Matty.007
"but the Chief Pleas refused to pass an ordinance that would forbid selling alcohol to anyone known to get too drunk." - drunk vs. too drunk?
Done. Matty.007
Second World War
Fine as is, though I'm not convinced that the PROCLAMATION is necessary
Postwar years
"Once again widowed, Hathaway resumed complete authority over the island. In 1957, Queen Elizabeth II and the Duke of Edinburgh returned to Sark in what was the first time a reigning monarch had ever come to the island" - clunky
Done. Matty.007
"On the 400th anniversary of Queen Elizabeth I's grant of charter to Sark's first seigneur" - what year was this?
Done. Matty.007
Death
fine
References
Ref4 - What does the "P." stand for in Guernsey P.?
I would have said Guernsey Press. Matty.007
Ref6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 - None of these have an online presence?
6 and 12 done, 7 nothing but Amazon, 8 nothing but Amazon and GBooks, 9 nothing (from now onwards nothing excludes Amazon, GBooks and Goodreads), nothing for any others
EL
fine
Images
All are Commons
Category
Place of birth missing - Isn't Guernsey sufficient?
Done, Matty.007
I'm done with the review. Please ping me when you think you've finished. --Rosiestep (talk) 04:56, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for the review, I have tried to fix all issues. Thanks, Matty.007 18:57, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality: 
B. MoS compliance: 
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources: 
B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary: 
C. No original research: 
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects: 
B. Focused: 
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias: 
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc: 
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales: 
B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions: 
Overall:
Pass or Fail: 
Good job. Looks adequate for GA. --Rosiestep (talk) 03:30, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

I am a bit ashamed to see that Matty had to address all the issues by himself. My editing pattern has been a little, well, erratic these days. Thank you both! Surtsicna (talk) 16:13, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for the review Rosiestep; Surtsicna, you wrote the article in the first place, well done! Thanks, Matty.007 17:54, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Sibyl Hathaway. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071103052223/http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/this_britain/article1928079.ece to http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/this_britain/article1928079.ece
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:49, 7 December 2017 (UTC)