# Talk:The Bog People

This review is transcluded from Talk:The Bog People/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Seabuckthorn (talk · contribs) 18:52, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
Nominator: Midnightblueowl (talk)
Hi! My review for this article will be here shortly.  --Seabuckthorn ♥ 18:52, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

1: Well-written

a. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors: 
b. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:  

2: Verifiable with no original research

a. Has an appropriate reference section:  Yes
b. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:  excellent (Thorough check on Google.)

c. No original research:   Done

3: Broad in its coverage

4: Neutral

5: Stable: No edit wars, etc:  Yes
6: Images  Done (NFC with a valid FUR) & (PD)

Midnightblueowl, I'm glad to see your work here. I do have some insights based on the above checklist that I think will improve the article: 

I think the lead needs to be fixed.
Besides that, I think the article looks excellent. All the best,  --Seabuckthorn ♥ 23:04, 18 February 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for the review Seabuckthorn; however I haven't made the suggested change, because I am unsure where in the current structure of the page the information on English and German translations could be placed. I could create a section all of its own, but then that might be deemed too short... Would you happen to have any advice ? . Midnightblueowl (talk) 20:11, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
Thanks, Midnightblueowl, very much for your diligence, care and precision in writing such great articles. I confess I'm not quite sure myself. I guess we should leave it as it is. That's the best advice I can give.  --Seabuckthorn ♥ 22:45, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
Promoting the article to GA status.  --Seabuckthorn ♥ 22:45, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

Much appreciated, Seabuckthorn ! Midnightblueowl (talk) 22:59, 20 February 2014 (UTC)