# Talk:SMS Arminius

This review is transcluded from Talk:SMS Arminius/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 19:36, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality: 

B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists: 
Publisher locations needed in refs.
Added. Parsecboy (talk) 23:51, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources: 

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary: 

C. No original research: 

Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects: 
Were the Krupp guns muzzle or breech-loaders? And I presume that they were rifled, right? Link to Penn and armored frigate.
Same as in Friedrich Carl - I can't find any more information on the guns. Links added. Parsecboy (talk) 23:51, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
B. Focused: 

Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias: 

Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc: 

Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales: 
No photos available on the net?
Same as Friedrich Carl again. Parsecboy (talk) 23:51, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions: 

Overall:
Pass or Fail: 

Add the photo on commons and we'll be done here.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 00:39, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

There's no source for that, and according to the WI article by Sullivan, the WZ-Bilddienst holds the copyright. When I get around to it, I'm actually going to nominate it for deletion based on that. Parsecboy (talk) 00:53, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
Your call, but I'd like to see something, even a fair-use scan from Groener.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 01:27, 13 March 2011 (UTC)