# Talk:Typhoon Nangka (2015)

IMO this article should not exist but to merge into the season article/2015 PTS article. This is because of short information within the article and citations. Also there are many storms which make landfall over a country and have significant damages which do not have an article like Typhoons Songda in 2004. What do you guys think? Typhoon2013 (talk) 06:42, 25 July 2015 (UTC)

Oppose because it clearly meets WP:GNG.--Jasper Deng (talk) 06:52, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Songda honestly needs an article, but that has nothing to do with Nangka. Pretty sure there's enough possible content for a stand alone article here. YE Pacific Hurricane 07:06, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
I'd give it a bit more time, but this doesn't seem to be an exceptional storm when it comes to its behavior. As a result, I don't think a Meteorological history-dominated article will do, so I suggest that rather than opposing a merge and leaving the article in its current not-so-great state, expand the Preparations and impact section. Dustin (talk) 15:56, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
Either could work. I mean the storm did last two weeks, even though it's MH was nothing atypical. But It's likely more viable to add impact. YE Pacific Hurricane 16:19, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
I added some Marianas Islands stuff, upped it to start. Definitely should not be merged. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk)  03:40, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
Oppose merge per WP:GNG, as brought up by Jasper. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 07:04, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
Ok. Keep the article. I will remove the merge sign at the top of the article. Typhoon2013 (talk) 20:50, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
I've worked on the article for the past few days. It's borderline notable enough, but I've found enough info to justify keeping it. I rated it as B-class for now, pending JMA's final BT, any NCDC report, or any additional report from Japan. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk)  18:22, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

Now that the article is done, is this more low importance? ♫ Hurricanehink (talk)  05:13, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

I went with low, given the low damage. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk)  15:58, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
@Hurricanehink: IMO it looks like that this article is at GA rating. From me merging this article to keeping this article with a higher rating than C, impressive! Typhoon2013 (talk) 08:58, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Thanks! I just gotta wait for any additional potential info. Hurricanehink mobile (talk) 12:09, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Typhoon Nangka (2015)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Yellow Evan (talk · contribs) 13:30, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

Will do. YE Pacific Hurricane 13:30, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

"Typhoon Nangka was a large and strong tropical cyclone impacting central Japan in July 2015. " to "Typhoon Nangka was a large and strong tropical cyclone that impacted central Japan in July 2015. " ("cyclone impacting" just does not sound right). YE Pacific Hurricane
Done (an anon actually did it). ♫ Hurricanehink (talk)  18:26, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
"Effects were worst in Japan" wouldn't it be "worse" in Japan? YE Pacific Hurricane
It compares the effects everywhere, so it would be "worst" since it compares several things. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk)  18:26, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
"where heavy rainfall reached 740 mm (29 in) in Kamikitayama, Nara Prefecture." "heavy" and the amount just seems redundant. YE Pacific Hurricane
OK, removed. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk)  18:26, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
"On July 6 after shear diminished, Nangka began to quickly intensify as it developed an eye in the center of the blossoming convection." wikilink eye. YE Pacific Hurricane
Done. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk)  18:26, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
"Nearly half of the nation's capital, Majuro, were left without power." shoudln't it be was since "nation's capital" is singular?
Yes, done. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk)  18:26, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
"Some coastal flooding was also noted,[27] causing crop damage.[28]" the noting of flooding caused crop damage? YE Pacific Hurricane
Changed :P ♫ Hurricanehink (talk)  18:26, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
"Across Japan, strong waves and high winds killed over 11,000 tons" imperial or metric? YE Pacific Hurricane
Neither, whoops. Talk about WP:OR. o.O ♫ Hurricanehink (talk)  18:26, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Typhoon Nangka (2015). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.prh.noaa.gov/data/GUM/HLSPQ3
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 17:41, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Typhoon Matmo (2014) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RMCD bot 02:02, 7 November 2016 (UTC)