# Talk:The Baby Shower (Seinfeld)

Image:Sein ep204.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 05:41, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
"Lists of miscellaneous information should be avoided." This is a pain in the ass. Some articles are all about the trivia.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.237.217.123 (talk) 23:46, 8 October 2008 (UTC) 

This review is transcluded from Talk:The Baby Shower (Seinfeld)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Cerebellum (talk) 15:36, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
Hello!  This article looks great, I'm going to go ahead and review it now.  Cerebellum (talk) 15:36, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
All right, I've looked over it, and I don't see any reason not to pass it.  There were a few minor issues with the prose, but I've fixed those; you might want to go over my edits and make sure that I haven't introduced any new errors.  
As for further improvements, it would be nice to have an image in the infobox.  It looks like maybe Image:Sein ep204.jpg was used for that before it was deleted, so if there's any way to get another image that would help this article a lot.  Otherwise, though, it's a great piece of work; congratulations!  Cerebellum (talk) 16:24, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

This article states that "It was the first episode (Larry) Charles wrote for the show.." but actually it was the third.  Charles gets writing credit for Season 2 Episode 8 The Statue as well as Season 2 Episode 10 The Heart Attack.  Wikipedia itself lists this fact as do the opening credits on the individual shows, so this should be enough for a registered user to re-write the incorrect sentence.  Thanks118.7.186.1 (talk) 17:21, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

How is this correct when Tarantino did not become popular until 1992? His only known film being My Best Friend's Birthday which only appeared in a few festivals and does not showcase the way Tarantino would make films after Reservoir Dogs. Or does Charles mean that it is comparable to what Tarantino does now and is not a direct reference at the time of writing? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.118.200.64 (talk) 17:01, 11 May 2010 (UTC) 

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on The Baby Shower (Seinfeld). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121005053258/http://www.sonypictures.com/tv/shows/seinfeld/episode_guide/?sl=episode&ep=204 to http://www.sonypictures.com/tv/shows/seinfeld/episode_guide/?sl=episode&ep=204
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:24, 18 June 2017 (UTC)