# Talk:Russian battleship Imperator Pavel I

This review is transcluded from Talk:Russian battleship Imperator Pavel I/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Parsecboy (talk · contribs) 20:34, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose):  b (MoS): 
The line about her commissioning and trials should be reversed, i.e., "the ship was commissioned in March 1911 but did not complete sea trials until..."
Let me double-check McLaughlin, but I think that it is correct as written.
Oh, I wasn't saying it was wrong, I was commenting on the chronological order - it sounds odd to say "in November I did xxxxxx but last July I did xxxxxxx." The sentence would flow better if you put it in chronological order. Parsecboy (talk) 02:39, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
OK, rewritten.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 00:31, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 
Halpern has a bit on page 190 that should be incorporated
Lemme check when I get home.
Have you had a look at this yet? Parsecboy (talk) 02:04, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
Done.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 14:27, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
Since McLaughlin is the only source cited, the others should be moved to a "further reading" section.
Done.
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 

It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 

It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 

Overall:
Pass/Fail: 
The article is in pretty good shape, just a few things that need fixing. Parsecboy (talk) 20:34, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for the review.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 01:20, 28 November 2011 (UTC)