# Talk:Zooropa

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

I don't see what's especially "searchable" about the U2-lyrics.org link, and it strikes me as redundant in light of the much more informative U2Wanderer.org link that includes, among other things, the complete album lyrics. But whatever. --typhoon 09:39, 13 May 2005 (UTC)

This might seem minor, but how about standardizing the playing time for the songs between the main Zooropa page and the individual songs? I've been adding a bit of information to each of the songs to try and flesh them out, and I think the only thing left to do is a bit of housekeeping. Another six 03:09, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
I'll go ahead and do that since the last discussion post was made over a year ago. My source, btw, is my iTunes rip. Another six 03:10, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Zooropa's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "allmusic":
From Achtung Baby: "Achtung Baby – Overview". Allmusic. Retrieved 2009-10-13.
From The Joshua Tree: Erlewine, Stephen Thomas. "The Joshua Tree - Overview". Allmusic. Retrieved 2009-12-02.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 18:49, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Zooropa/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Lemurbaby (talk) 05:19, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): ; b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): 

It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): ; b (citations to reliable sources): ; c (No original research): 
Please substantiate the final assertion regarding the hidden track (alarm sound) following "The Wanderer" at the end of the album.
I'm sorry - are you saying I should cite an uncited statement about the alarm (which I don't see in the article), or that I should specifically mention it? Y2Kcrazyjoker4 (talk •  contributions) 07:39, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
I'm referring to the statement following the list of album tracks in the Track listing section. The assertion there should be substantiated using a citation.
Oh geez, I completely missed that it was there! I'll find a reference. Y2Kcrazyjoker4 (talk •  contributions) 19:13, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
 Pass Content revised. Lemurbaby (talk) 15:02, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
Please complete the reference for footnote 44 (de la Parra) - there is no related citation in the bibliography.  I also did not see a point when you cited the book in the bibliography listed as authored by U2.
de la Parra was added. The book "authored" by U2 is U2 by U2, which is comprised entirely of the band members' own words from interviews. They didn't explicitly write it, but all of the words in the book are their own. The WikiProject U2 typically credits the footnotes to Neil McCormick, who essentially edited the book and compiled the entire thing. In summary, the footnotes for U2 by U2 credit McCormick.  Y2Kcrazyjoker4 (talk •  contributions) 07:39, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
 Pass Bibliography is complete. Lemurbaby (talk) 14:17, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): ; b (focused): 
I would like to see the introduction expanded to provide an overview of a few more choice sections of the article.
I've attempted to address this in the last paragraph of the lead. Y2Kcrazyjoker4 (talk •  contributions) 07:39, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
 Pass Lead provides sufficient overview of article content. Lemurbaby (talk) 14:17, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 

It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): ; b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 
The article is very text-heavy. Two or three more illustrations would contribute significantly to its readability. Macphisto was a Zooropa-era innovation, wasn't he? Is there a photo of him that can be added?
I've added an image of Brian Eno - I can't really think of any others that we could add that would be relevant (except for an image of the band somewhere). If you can find some free images of the group from that time period, that would be superb. But I'm afraid I have not found any, except for "The Fly" image of Bono from the previous year, and I doubt that one of MacPhisto exists (that would likely require request that someone's existing image be licensed for free use). Y2Kcrazyjoker4 (talk •  contributions) 07:39, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
 PassThanks for adding the Brian Eno photo. I've also added one of the shooting of the "Stay" video, which the user claims is her own work. She has also posted a second closer shot of Bono in which he is turned to face the camera, so it's possible she was there and these are her own work - unless both shots come from a book or perhaps a different version of the video from what I've seen. Do you recognize the image from a book yourself? Lemurbaby (talk) 14:17, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
I actually had the same thoughts about the "Stay" images and asked the user about in on their talk page. It's apparently an image taken by a relative who did admin work in Berlin at the time. Y2Kcrazyjoker4 (talk •  contributions) 19:13, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

Overall:
Pass/Fail: 

From one U2 fan to another, excellent work on this article! Once the minor issues above are addressed, I think it will be ready to go to GA. Lemurbaby (talk) 06:10, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
Congratulations! The article looks beautiful. It's a pleasure to mark it as GA. -- Lemurbaby (talk) 15:02, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

in the Achtung boxset, and there are plenty of sources, including in the Achtung Baby page itself. --TangoTizerWolfstone (talk) 09:17, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

The booklet has the message "The Freedom of Zooropa is awarded to Willie Mannion and Rob Kirwan". It's not in the article but what does this mean?--TangoTizerWolfstone (talk) 22:48, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

So, I understand there's a quote in a Mat Snow book that calls this album "experimental rock", which is the reason it was entered as a genre in the infobox. Listen... "experimental" is one of those words that music journalists often abuse to refer to musicians stretching their limits or dabbling in other genres. It's become a muddled term that is quite often not used properly. You would be hard pressed to find a song on Zooropa that is truly experimental by the definition set forth in the experimental rock article:

"a subgenre of rock music which pushes the boundaries of common composition and performance technique or which experiments with the basic elements of the genre. Artists aim to liberate and innovate, with some of the genre's distinguishing characteristics being improvisational performances, avant-garde influences, odd instrumentation, opaque lyrics (or instrumentals), unorthodox structures and rhythms, and an underlying rejection of commercial aspirations."
Although quite creative and different from U2's previous music, Zooropa doesn't seem to fit this definition to me. Because of the contentious, muddled nature of the "experimental" label, I think it would be best to only include the genre in the infobox if 1.) a source offers detailed commentary on the nature of the music describing what makes it experimental (e.g. odd instrumentation, unorthodox musical structure) or 2.) there are multiple sources available that describe the music as experimental rock. Y2Kcrazyjoker4 (talk •  contributions) 05:38, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Zooropa/CommentsTalk:Zooropa/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
Last edited at 04:11, 6 August 2008 (UTC).
Substituted at 11:18, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 6 external links on Zooropa. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20080820092500/http://www.infodisc.fr/Albums_ChartRun.php to http://www.infodisc.fr/Albums_ChartRun.php
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080721010559/http://www.aria.com.au/pages/aria-charts-end-of-year-charts-top-50albums-1993.htm to http://www.aria.com.au/pages/aria-charts-end-of-year-charts-top-50albums-1993.htm
Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20131105111425/http://hitparade.ch/year.asp?key=1993 to http://hitparade.ch/year.asp?key=1993
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151226154145/http://www.sverigetopplistan.se/ to http://www.sverigetopplistan.se/
Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/5hFf8iFDu to http://www.irishcharts.ie/search/placement
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080319091720/http://everyhit.com/ to http://everyhit.com/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:30, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Zooropa. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141006081109/http://www.ampvisual.com/blog/u2-x-5-hidden-things/ to http://www.ampvisual.com/blog/u2-x-5-hidden-things/
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.officialcharts.de/charts.asp?cat=a&country=de&year=1993&date=19930719&x=43&y=12
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:40, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

Is there a particular reason to keep the Spin green circle in the ratings table? I know the Pitchfork review from last year was at one point added and removed, but in my opinion, it – or at least some numerical/star/graded rating – would be preferable to the, I think, rather incomprehensible Spin traffic light, insofar as I doubt most users would intuitively know what it means (I certainly didn't at first), and I don't think I've seen it used on any other article. Thoughts?--TangoTizerWolfstone (talk) 02:32, 23 January 2022 (UTC)