# Talk:Red-tailed hawk

It has been a while since this article has been reviewed, so I took a look and noticed the following:

There are lots of uncited statements, including entire paragraphs.
At over 18,000 words, this article is too detailed and WP:TOOBIG. Many sections are numerous paragraphs long without a heading, making the text difficult to read on mobile devices. This article should be trimmed, with information spun out, summarised more effectively, or removed if too detailed.
Should this article go to WP:GAR? Z1720 (talk) 01:17, 1 July 2025 (UTC)


### Red-tailed hawk