# Talk:The Story of a Fierce Bad Rabbit

This review is transcluded from Talk:The Story of a Fierce Bad Rabbit/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Kaguya-chan (talk) 14:31, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose):  b (MoS): 

It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 
The first paragraph in Composition and publication has no source
Done. References entered. Susanne2009NYC (talk) 19:04, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 

It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 

It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 

Overall:
Pass/Fail: 

Wonderful work. It now meets the GA criteria. Keep up the good work! Kaguya-chan (talk) 19:14, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of The Story of a Fierce Bad Rabbit's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "Taylor130":
From The Story of Miss Moppet: Taylor, p. 130
From The Sly Old Cat: Taylor 130

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 18:28, 20 July 2010 (UTC)