# Talk:Pepsi Invaders

I've added a fair-use rationale. --Delirium (talk) 00:32, 17 November 2011 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Pepsi Invaders. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://archive.is/20130122023001/http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=270537299395 to http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=270537299395
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:58, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Pepsi Invaders/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Namcokid47 (talk · contribs) 18:47, 26 August 2019 (UTC)

You took a look at some of my older nominations, so I thought I'd try doing the same as to help clear out some of these. Namcokid47 (talk) 18:47, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
Okay, a couple of things:

Because both of these sections are so short, I suggest merging the Gameplay and Development sections into one.
Done for this and the impact section.
Per this discussion, screenshots are not allowed in the infobox, so I would move it to the Gameplay section. The game doesn't have an official box from what I can see, so I would say using an iamge of the cartridge is okay.
I don't find that the discussion is really relevant here. The arguments made don't really apply, as the cartridge is not likely to be the most well-known aspect of the game. This is certainly an exception to the rule.
Impact and rarity can be merged together too. I also think the line "Most of the cartridges were discarded due to disinterest by their recipients" could be moved into the development paragraph.
Mm, I dunno about that; I feel that it being in this section helps to elaborate upon its rarity. - Bryn (talk) (contributions) 16:04, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
Namcokid47 (talk) 20:03, 26 August 2019 (UTC)

That said, I'm going to try and address length issues and seek out more sources if possible before I'd like to see this passed (if it does). - Bryn (talk) (contributions) 16:05, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
It's looking a lot better now. Few more things:

The Apprentice link needs to be fixed, leads to a DAB page at the moment.
Pipe link for Coca-Cola Company should be removed so it matches with the lead.
"Most of the cartridges were discarded due to disinterest by their recipients" should probably be moved into the History section.
Namcokid47 (talk) 19:13, 27 August 2019 (UTC)

Issues addressed. - Bryn (talk) (contributions) 02:31, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
Okay, I think it looks good. Passed. Namcokid47 (talk) 18:10, 30 August 2019 (UTC)

https://archive.org/details/Digital_Press_Issue_46_2001-07_Santulli_Joe_US/page/n25?q=%22Pepsi+Invaders%22
https://archive.org/details/RetroGamerIssue041-045/page/n23?q=%22Pepsi+Invaders%22