# Talk:Weathering with You

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://jpbound.com/2019/07/21/tenki-no-ko-weathering-with-you-full-story-synopsis-spoilers/. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Masum Reza📞 18:35, 10 August 2019 (UTC)

Suggestions generated by an automatic JavaScript program on 20:08, 13 August 2019 (UTC), and might not be applicable for the article in question.

Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at Wikipedia:Lead. The article should have an appropriate number of paragraphs as is shown on WP:LEAD, and should adequately summarize the article.
 Expanding... Masum Reza📞 00:23, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
Consider adding more links to the article; per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (links) and Wikipedia:Build the web, create links to relevant articles.
The script has spotted the following contractions: Doesn't, if these are outside of quotations, they should be expanded.
 Comment: Only "doesn't" I see in the article, is in the citation 44 title. Since it is the original title, I don't think we should change it. Masum Reza📞 20:14, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
As done in WP:FOOTNOTE, footnotes usually are located right after a punctuation mark (as recommended by the CMS, but not mandatory), such that there is no space in between. For example, the sun is larger than the moon [2]. is usually written as the sun is larger than the moon.[2]
Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a.
 Comment: I asked for copyediting on GOCE. Masum Reza📞 23:11, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas.

Hi Masumrezarock100. Completely outside anything I have ever experienced in RL or edited on Wikipedia. (I mostly edit history articles). That said, I picked up a couple of things:
The "Reception" section seems thin for a supposedly notable film. Maybe have a look at this section in some films that have passed GAN - Wikipedia:Good articles/Media and drama?
Some statements don't make sense, I assume because of lack of context. Eg "SoftBank and Weathering with You were seen to promote each other in various TV clips." I have no idea what this means. (See two points down.)
I rephrased it a little. Masum Reza📞 00:21, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
A number of additional Wikilinks could usefully be used. (Eg Encore Films.)
Try to read it as if it was written for someone who knows nothing about the topic, after all Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. Then add in, succinctly, the information needed to understand.
Having glanced at some other film articles, there seems to be less information than one would expect at GAN in every section other than "Plot". Eg, the two main characters each have only two short sentences of description. Compare with [[1]]. (Just a random example I found.)
The titles of all films should be in italics - as in the tile of the article: Weathering with You.
 Done Masum Reza📞 00:21, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
All of that said, there is little to fault with what is there. It is good, clear, well written and solidly referenced. (Except for "The other songs include "Voice of Wind" (風たちの声 "Kaze-tachi no Koe"), "Celebration" (祝祭 "Shukusai") and "We'll Be Alright (大丈夫 "Daijōbu").) So I suspect that it could be worked up into a GAN, but I don't think that it is there yet.
As I said, this is completely outside my area, so treat everything I say with care. Let me know if you do want to work Weathering with You towards GAN and I will keep an eye on it and perhaps offer occasional advice. Copied from Gog the Mild's talk page on 22:51, 13 August 2019 (UTC) by Masum Reza📞 , originally added on 18:58, 13 August 2019 (UTC)

Hi Baffle gab1978, thanks for all your help. I've a question if you don't mind me asking. Where in the article, I should include this following information? it was selected as the Japanese entry for the Best International Feature Film at the 92nd Academy Awards. It is currently in the lead, but the lead summarizes the content of the article, so I should mention it in the article. Any suggestions would be helpful. Again, thanks. Masum Reza📞 04:46, 7 September 2019 (UTC)

Can anyone update the total worldwide Box Office with the following figures from Southeast Asia countries?

Singapore - $750,000 (S$1.04 million) + highest-grossing anime film in Singapore
Source: https://www.straitstimes.com/lifestyle/entertainment/weathering-with-you-is-top-anime-film-in-singapore

Malaysia, Brunei - $670,000 (RM 2,838,344) + All-Time No.1 Animation Film in Malaysia and Brunei
Source: https://anitrendz.net/news/2019/10/06/weathering-with-you-crosses-the-s1-million-mark-in-singapore/

Indonesia - $738,000 (Rp 10,468,653,500)
Source: https://anitrendz.net/news/2019/10/06/weathering-with-you-crosses-the-s1-million-mark-in-singapore/

This review is transcluded from Talk:Weathering with You/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Lee Vilenski (talk · contribs) 18:18, 15 July 2020 (UTC)

Hello, I am planning on reviewing this article for GA Status, over the next couple of days. Thank you for nominating the article for GA status. I hope I will learn some new information, and that my feedback is helpful. 
If nominators or editors could refrain from updating the particular section that I am updating until it is complete, I would appreciate it to remove a edit conflict. Please address concerns in the section that has been completed above (If I've raised concerns up to references, feel free to comment on things like the lede.)
I generally provide an overview of things I read through the article on a first glance. Then do a thorough sweep of the article after the feedback is addressed. After this, I will present the pass/failure. I will use strikethrough tags when concerns are met. Even if something is obvious why my concern is met, please leave a message as courtesy. 
Best of luck! you can also use the {{done}} tag to state when something is addressed. Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 
Please let me know after the review is done, if you were happy with the review! Obviously this is regarding the article's quality, however, I want to be happy and civil to all, so let me know if I have done a good job, regardless of the article's outcome.


### Immediate Failures
It is a long way from meeting any one of the six good article criteria -
It contains copyright infringements -
It has, or needs, cleanup banners that are unquestionably still valid. These include{{cleanup}}, {{POV}}, {{unreferenced}} or large numbers of {{citation needed}}, {{clarify}}, or similar tags. (See also {{QF-tags}}). -
It is not stable due to edit warring on the page. -


### Links
Could you had some more details to these sources:
[2], [3], [4]

Replaced [5] with a better source. The YouTube source and the other twitter source is reliable since they are coming from the official licensors. Thanks. Ainz Ooal Gown (talk) 14:34, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
Could you be a little more consistent in either linking or not linking publishers (I usually just remove wholesale.)
ref 87 has  Morrissy, Kim (July 24, 2019). "REVIEW: Weathering With You". Anime News Network. Anime News Network. Archived from the original on July 24, 2019. Retrieved July 24, 2019. - Two entries for Anime News Network.
 Fixed. Ainz Ooal Gown (talk) 14:01, 22 July 2020 (UTC)


### Prose
#### Lede
is a 2019 Japanese animated romantic fantasy film written - WP:SEAOFBLUE. try something like "is a Japanese animated 2019 romance and fantasy film." or simply remove the last two links as quite regular terms. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 13:37, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
 Done used the former option. Ainz Ooal Gown (talk) 17:36, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
in its home country, Japan - we've already denoted this. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 13:37, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
 Removed Ainz Ooal Gown (talk) 17:36, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
Most reviews have given the film a generally positive response. - The film received generally positive reviews. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 13:37, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
 Done Ainz Ooal Gown (talk) 17:36, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
On rating aggregator websites like Rotten Tomatoes and Metacritic, the film generally been rated positively by critics. - OTT, we already said this in the sentence prior. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 13:37, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
Changed to On the review aggregator website Rotten Tomatoes, the film has a 91% rating, with the critics' consensus saying; it is beautifully animated and narratively engaged. On Metacritic, the film scored 72 out of 100 showing generally favorable reaction. Do you think it's okay? Ainz Ooal Gown (talk) 17:50, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
Except we don't generally put the actual review scores in prose. On Metacritic, just use the actual words it uses. Otherwise fine. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 14:44, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
criticised the film for being a follow up to Your Name, adding that it depends too much on it - needs a bit better wording. Being a follow up isn't what they are criticising. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 13:37, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
Okay, used another hook for criticism. Please check. Ainz Ooal Gown (talk) 17:51, 21 July 2020 (UTC)


#### General
I have no idea if the plot section is accurate. But maybe a couple more wikilinks? Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 14:23, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
I copyedited the plot section and expanded it a bit and added more wikilinks too. Ainz Ooal Gown (talk) 17:57, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
Production seems a little flat. Only that it was announced, what the team was. Is there no info on the creation/animation dates or anything? Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 14:23, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
 Added. Please check the second para of the Production section. Ainz Ooal Gown (talk) 17:30, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
Other key roles were filled with returning crew members of Your Name. - might need to explain why this show is important. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 14:23, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
Hmm, I don't think we should "explain" it in details in this article. But I have added a few things about Your Name in the article. Ainz Ooal Gown (talk) 17:57, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
Your name and Anime Limited are duplicated links. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 14:23, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
 Removed duplicate links. Ainz Ooal Gown (talk) 08:39, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
Unlink France, per WP:GEOLAND. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 14:23, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
 Removed. Ainz Ooal Gown (talk) 08:39, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
I don't think you need subsections for adaptations.
 Removed. Ainz Ooal Gown (talk) 08:39, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
I've done some copyedits. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 14:23, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
@Lee Vilenski: I think I got the most of it. I have also expanded other sections, including characters and adaptions section. Let me know if you have more comments. Ainz Ooal Gown (talk) 17:57, 21 July 2020 (UTC)


### GA Review
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, spelling, and grammar):  b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): 

It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):  d (copyvio and plagiarism): 

It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 

It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 

It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 

Overall:
Pass/Fail: 


### Review meta comments
I'll begin the review as soon as I can! If you fancy returning the favour, I have outstanding GA and FA nominations that require reviewing at WP:GAN and WP:FAC, respectively. I'd be very grateful if you were to complete one of these, however it's definitely not mandatory. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs)
 I'm going to go ahead an pass this - I've added some additional fixes for the links to do at your leisure. If you wish to take this any further, I'd recommend less reliance on sources such twitter, youtube and forbes. However, good work on the article, and well done. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 07:06, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
I would like to thank you those who contributed to this article, and Japanese wiki editors who helped me indirectly by finding sources, and expanding the article on Japanese Wikipedia. They are the reason I was able to get this article promoted to GA. This article still needs few improvements; I will take a look at them later when I have time. Ainz Ooal Gown (talk) 16:20, 22 July 2020 (UTC)

Hello pagestalkers. The following message was left on my talkpage by a new editor (probably because I left a "Welcome to Wikipedia!" message on that editor's talkpage so they had my contact info).  

Recently, I went through the page of Weathering with You, I found that a line 'The film grossed over ¥35.11 billion (US$322.08 million) worldwide.' where no source are added to confirm the gross. Can you please help me in relocating the reference for the gross. But, I have a thought in my mind that $322.08 million is too high for the film. Serana Moegi (talk) 04:10, 2 July 2021 (UTC).
Serana Moegi, I am hopeful that someone who has watchlisted this article can answer your question. --Rosiestep (talk) 08:32, 2 July 2021 (UTC)

@Serana Moegi:, @Rosiestep: I just fixed the stated error. Box Office Mojo was the source provided for the gross but the article completely contradicted this source. Not sure how this happened but it’s fixed now. KaitoNkmra23 (talk!) 11:28, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
@KaitoNkmra23:;@Rosiestep: Thank you for your help and concern to my question! Have a good day. Serana Moegi (talk) 11:37, 2 July 2021 (UTC)

I was just wondering if it'd be better to rename the section to "characters" like in Your Name Hodakatokyoboy (talk) 18:37, 29 November 2022 (UTC)