# Talk:Tropical Storm Winona (1990)

1 2

This review is transcluded from Talk:Tropical Storm Winona (1990)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Wilhelmina Will (talk · contribs) 07:15, 29 January 2018 (UTC)


### GA criteria
Well-written: With the issues outlined below having been addressed, the article satisfies MOS policies for grammar, as well as general structural layout. Says the 21st century, "I'm 18 and I like it!" (talk) 04:08, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
(a) the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct
(b) it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation
Verifiable with no original research: The article fully uses a very decently-sized quantity of reputable sources. No signs of original research. Says the 21st century, "I'm 18 and I like it!" (talk) 04:06, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
(a) it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline
(b) reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose)
(c) it contains no original research
Broad in its coverage: The article satisfactorily covers all expected aspects of its topic. Says the 21st century, "I'm 18 and I like it!" (talk) 04:05, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
(a) it addresses the main aspects of the topic
(b) it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style)
Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. The article maintains a non-biased approach to its topic. Says the 21st century, "I'm 18 and I like it!" (talk) 04:04, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. The article has not been subjected to edit warring or similar behaviour since its creation. Says the 21st century, "I'm 18 and I like it!" (talk) 07:18, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: The two images used in the article to-date are public domain, and serve relevant illustrative purposes in this article. Says the 21st century, "I'm 18 and I like it!" (talk) 07:18, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
(a) media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content
(b) media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions


### Comments
"Meteorological history" paragraph 2: "...simultaneously, the agency estimated that the typhoon in peak intensity, with winds of 120 km/h (75 mph)..." They estimated that the typhoon in peak intensity... what?
"Impact", paragraph 1: "A peak rainfall total occurred of 545 mm (21.5 in) in Hakone..." Shouldn't use of the term "occurred" occur after the numeric amount?
"Impact", paragraph 3: "Damage was estimated at damage totaled 243.1 million yen"... No comment. Says the 21st century, "I'm 18 and I like it!" (talk) 09:53, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
Cleared up in 3 instances. Thanks for the review. YE Pacific Hurricane 23:13, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
Thanks! That about clears it up! Says the 21st century, "I'm 18 and I like it!" (talk) 04:04, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
 The article satisfies the GA criteria, and therefore is passed. Congratulations! Says the 21st century, "I'm 18 and I like it!" (talk) 04:08, 31 January 2018 (UTC)