# Talk:Rocket to Russia

The image Image:Ramones Sheena.ogg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here.  In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page.  Please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
That this article is linked to from the image description page.
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --04:25, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

On the LP Rocket to Russia the songs are credited to the Ramones and the copyright registrations for these songs show words and music by Jeffrey Hyman, Douglas Colvin, Thomas Erdelyi and John Cummings. The source being offered, a youtube video, is far from definitive and the interview is peppered with qualifying phrases such as "I'm not sure", "I hear", "I think" and "I don't know." In fact, the interview begins by talking about how the Ramones collaborated. As far as exactly who wrote what within a collaborative songwriting effort should be addressed in the body of the article. Unfortunately, that may require an editor to compose a complete sentence or two, maybe even a short paragraph. Piriczki (talk) 12:59, 29 March 2012 (UTC)

Shouldn't it be "lobotomee" in "Gonna get my Ph.D, I'm a teenage lobotomy"?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.248.218.89 (talk) 10:20, 30 July 2017 (UTC) 

This review is transcluded from Talk:Rocket to Russia/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Seabuckthorn (talk · contribs) 09:36, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Nominator: CrowzRSA
Hi! My review for this article will be here shortly.  --Seabuckthorn ♥ 09:36, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

1: Well-written

a. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors: 
b. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:  

2: Verifiable with no original research

a. Has an appropriate reference section:  Yes
b. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:  excellent (Thorough check on Google.)

c. No original research:   Done

3: Broad in its coverage

4: Neutral

5: Stable: No edit wars, etc:  Yes
6: Images  Done (NFC with a valid FUR) 

CrowzRSA, I'm very happy and inspired to see your work here. I do have some insights based on the above checklist that I think will improve the article: 

I think the lead can be improved in order to provide an accessible overview and to give relative emphasis for the Lyrics and compositions.
I think I fixed it, I added the information to the Lyrics and compositions section. CrowzRSA 22:47, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
Thanks  --Seabuckthorn ♥ 01:48, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
Besides that, I think the article looks excellent. Please feel free to strike out any recommendation from this review which you think will not help in improving the article which is our main aim here. All the best,  --Seabuckthorn ♥ 11:24, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

Promoting the article to GA status.  --Seabuckthorn ♥ 01:48, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

The album cover is arguably public domain per its publication in this issue of Billboard Magazine as an advertisement without a copyright notice specific to the advertisement.  I'm not sure how this works given the international issues involved, but likely is public domain at least in the US. Calliopejen1 (talk) 22:12, 6 November 2017 (UTC)