# Talk:Sophie Rain

'Rain took a minimum wage job as a waitress at a mom and pop restaurant, but was fired after attracting success on social media and set up an OnlyFans account at the suggestion of her friends.'
Why was she fired, if the 'success on social media' was not yet on OnlyFans? 62.73.72.3 (talk) 06:02, 28 April 2025 (UTC)
Resolved, I have now edited the article to avoid the implication that the two things were causally linked, as nothing in the source suggests this. (full disclosure - I am the same person as 62.73.72.3 above, I just hadn't logged into my account).--Anonymous44 (talk) 06:24, 28 April 2025 (UTC)

"a Generation Z slang term used to denote people who made money out of their body": change to "bodies". People plural have bodies plural. 2A00:23C5:FE1C:3701:D5D5:E045:C682:6F99 (talk) 19:32, 1 August 2025 (UTC)

I fixed that.--Launchballer 22:21, 1 August 2025 (UTC)

Is any information verified by credible sources like her income, real name, and real age? There is reason to believe this information is fake. Also does this Article meet notability standards? 75.229.244.16 (talk) 02:23, 5 September 2025 (UTC)

IP editor, there are multiple credible sources to verify her income, age, and name, such as the South China Morning Post and The Independent. Regarding notability, WP:BLP says that People are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject. Multiple articles from reliable, independent sources cover her, so this certainly meets notability standards for biographies. Icepinner  13:51, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
South China Morning Post and The Independent are tabloid-y. The proof of her income is random screenshots on podcasts and streams, being reported by these garbage tabloid clickbait sites. 75.229.244.16 (talk) 20:52, 6 September 2025 (UTC)

I am aware that there are few reliable sources for this, but it seems to be quite agreed upon that the name is a pseudonym, and possibly that her birthdate is inaccurate.
Obviously no speculated name or birthdate should be added to the article, but shouldn't there be a footnote saying that the name Sophie Rain is a pseudonym. And should maybe even her birthdate be removed completely? The source isn't particularly good. AFeatherlessBipehead (talk) 16:09, 20 October 2025 (UTC)

The birthdate comes under WP:ABOUTSELF. You'd need strong referencing for any of the rest.--Launchballer 16:16, 20 October 2025 (UTC)
She has posted very contradictory information about her age/birthdate on social media. And can't it be mentioned that her name is possibly a pseudonym? AFeatherlessBipehead (talk) 16:21, 20 October 2025 (UTC)
Citation needed for the first, and absolutely not without strong referencing.--Launchballer 16:24, 20 October 2025 (UTC)
A lot of sources in this article are tabloids, as mentioned in the above posts. And I think that her birthday should just be removed entirely. AFeatherlessBipehead (talk) 16:59, 20 October 2025 (UTC)
The tabloids in the article are tabloid (newspaper format), not tabloid journalism, and as such are fine for what they are used for. I'm still waiting for evidence that she's lied about her birthdate, without which her birthday should stay.--Launchballer 17:29, 20 October 2025 (UTC)
I maintain that the use of WP:CALC to justify combining different sources for a living person's date of birth is a misreading of policy. On the issue of pseudonyms, MOS:SURNAME says biographical subjects should be referred to by their pseudonymous surnames if that is how reliable sources refer to them. Merely guessing that a name is possibly a pseudonym would be original research. —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 17:34, 20 October 2025 (UTC)
https://www.tiktok.com/@sophieraiin/video/7552609538977910030?_r=1&_t=8rcKIDokDY7
https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcR8iNV43f--xl-8wiaduDfmWc5i-E2yi2SArEIzSK7RxMe49isBeGDTo-m2f3XydZ1s9Is&usqp=CAU
She has given different birthdates, it should be removed from this article AFeatherlessBipehead (talk) 17:37, 20 October 2025 (UTC)
I don't see how the 'encrypted' image indicates that it is in fact from her. There was a snow consensus to include the full date at Talk:Bonnie Blue (actress)/Archive 1#RfC: Blue's full DOB in almost identical circumstances; may set up an RfC here.--Launchballer 17:45, 20 October 2025 (UTC)
I think an RfC would be a good idea. But I stand with that her DOB has not been widely published by reliable sources. AFeatherlessBipehead (talk) 10:57, 21 October 2025 (UTC)