# Talk:Supermarine Spitfire

Article is using four editions of Price (mix of editions and reprints?). Probably best to use only after the revised edition from 1995 and one edition of that to make life easier on the readers GraemeLeggett (talk) 18:35, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

I am concerned that this article no longer meets the good article criteria, due to several uncited statements and paragraphs. Is anyone interested in addressing this concern, or should this go to WP:GAR? Z1720 (talk) 03:11, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Not a five minute job! I count 20 citation needed tags, most (if not all) don't clarify what needs citing in a sentence that has more than one fact. One cn tag is in front of a ref, is that still needed? The quick solution is to remove entire sentences where the facts can't easily be verified. I count nine CN tags in the memorial section, those entries could be removed. It is a popular article with many well-meaning editors pulling in different directions and adding uncited text. Nimbus (Cumulus nimbus floats by) 13:33, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
In addition to uncited prose, there are also uncited notes which will need to be resolved: sometimes the some ref used for the prose can be used for the notes, but the source will have to be checked to ensure it verifies what is in the note. Z1720 (talk) 14:20, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
@Nimbus227: Are you interested in addressing the above concerns? If not, would you be interested in nominating this for WP:GAR? Z1720 (talk) 20:24, 28 January 2025 (UTC)
I'm afraid not, it would be too difficult to untangle the unsourced material from the good stuff without access to all the reference sources, such a shame. Unless the article is watched closely after any repairs it would deteriorate again, negating any time and effort spent, a wiki-wide problem sadly. Nimbus (Cumulus nimbus floats by) 09:47, 29 January 2025 (UTC)


### Supermarine Spitfire