# Talk:Summerhill (book)

{{Did you know nominations/Summerhill (book)}} czar ⨹
There's almost nothing about the content of the book or ideas containe therein.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 168.235.1.4 (talk) 18:16, 7 November 2013 (UTC) 

This review is transcluded from Talk:Summerhill (book)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: The Herald (talk · contribs) 14:22, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
I'll try my best to complete the review in a couple of days. -The Herald the joy of the LORDmy strength 14:22, 24 April 2015 (UTC)


### Criteria
### Review
Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors: 

B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists: 

Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. Has an appropriate reference section: 

B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary: 

C. No original research: 

Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects: 

B. Focused: 

Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias: 

Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc: 

Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content: 

B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions: 

Overall:
Pass or Fail: 


### Comments and discussion
The article is a cool one and fine. But here some points of concern:

It is known for introducing his ideas to the American public. It was published in America on November 7, 1960, by the Hart Publishing Company and later revised as Summerhill School: A New View of Childhood in 1993. could be merged..-The Herald the joy of the LORDmy strength 16:00, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
@The Herald, thanks for the review! Could me merged how? czar ⨹ 17:34, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
History section could be better be called as background section instead. -The Herald the joy of the LORDmy strength 16:00, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
✓ done czar ⨹ 17:34, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Do we have any template to be transcribed at the bottom? -The Herald the joy of the LORDmy strength 16:00, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Do you mean a navbox? No, the topic group is too small: the school, Neill, and the book. I'm looking into another option... czar ⨹ 17:34, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
A slight expansion in legacy and you are done. -The Herald the joy of the LORDmy strength 16:00, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
What aspects are not covered in the current Legacy section? I believe Bailey is the best overview available. czar ⨹ 17:34, 25 April 2015 (UTC)


### Result
 The article is passed the GA review. -The Herald the joy of the LORDmy strength 07:42, 26 April 2015 (UTC)


### Additional notes