# Talk:Spanish conquest of El Salvador

This review is transcluded from Talk:Spanish conquest of El Salvador/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Auntieruth55 (talk · contribs) 17:37, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, spelling, and grammar):  b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): 

It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):  d (copyvio and plagiarism): 
Checked with Eargwig's Copy vio detector.  17.4%--refers back to sources credited, and key words and phrases. Nothing I found extraordinary.
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 

It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 

It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 
Nicely done, and I commend you on your persistence with this and Spanish conquest of Honduras
Overall:
Pass/Fail: 
auntieruth (talk) 17:46, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

"...advantage in terms of weaponry."
A lot of the claims made in  the sources cited in regards to the degree of the advantage provided by weapons used in battle sound nothing more than  conjecture or one-sided agenda driven accounts. With a large portion of the population dying or physically weakened by diseases, in all likelihood that was a bigger contributing factor than war, let alone weaponry.   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.59.117.190 (talk) 12:40, 27 August 2020 (UTC) 

Message originally posted to Talk:Spanish conquest of El Salvador/GA1. Graham87 15:10, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

It seems strange to me that in the introductory paragraph, El Salvador was stated to be the smallest Central American country (with a population of millions) while Belize has 419,199 pop. (2020)? I recommend this be revised/reworded.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by HolmKønøman (talk • contribs) 21:59, 17 March 2022 (UTC)