# Talk:U.S. Route 11 in Maryland

This review is transcluded from Talk:U.S. Route 11 in Maryland/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Racepacket (talk) 02:43, 28 November 2010 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)
This is a nice piece of work, but I am placing it on hold so that you can address a few concerns.
Disamb link: Hager House.
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose):  b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): 
"constructed in the late 1900s" means 1995.  Just say "1909" which is what appears in the History section.
 Fixed  VC  20:36, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
"crosses Norfolk Southern Railway's Hagerstown District" - what is it? a line? a freight yard?
 Fixed I clarified that it is a rail line.  VC  20:36, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
"and immediately crosses the Norfolk Southern rail line again" - at grade?
 Fixed I clarified that the highway crosses over the rail line.  VC  20:36, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
"bridge across the Potomac River was rebuilt in 1978 and 1979" should be "bridge across the Potomac River was rebuilt in 1978-79" because it was only rebuilt once.
 Fixed I changed to a single year, 1979, to remove the ambiguity.  VC  20:36, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
"For this extension, US 11 was relocated to a tunnel underneath the extended runway in 2006." I assume that when building the tunnel, they did not go back to the original alignment, but kept the curve. Please state one way or the other.
I rewrote the sentence as follows: "For this extension, US 11 was relocated to a tunnel underneath the extended runway along the curved alignment in 2006."  Let me know if that addresses the issue or if you have any further suggestions.  VC  20:36, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 
In route description, clarify that the WVA-MD state line is the south side of the Potomac River, so that the bridge is in Maryland.
 Fixed  VC  20:36, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
Based on actual signage, it is accurate to say that the junction is with both I-81 and I-70 in the junction table?
 Fixed I checked the signage and I-70 is not included, so I removed the I-70 mention from the Junction list.  VC  20:36, 28 November 2010 (UTC)

It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 

It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 

It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 

Overall:
Pass/Fail: 

I am putting the article on hold. Thanks, Racepacket (talk) 03:13, 28 November 2010 (UTC)

I addressed all of your concerns.  Please let me know if you have any questions.  VC  20:36, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
I went ahead and fixed the link to Hager House.  Good work. Congratulations. Racepacket (talk) 21:39, 28 November 2010 (UTC)