# Talk:USS Tucker (DD-57)

This review is transcluded from Talk:USS Tucker (DD-57)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Below is my review:

GA review (see here for criteria)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose):  b (MoS): 
Lead: 'Tucker sailed off the east coast and in the Caribbean' - Not quite elegant
Good point. I've changed so it says "sailed in the Atlantic and the Caribbean" — Bellhalla (talk) 17:39, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
Design and construction: 'the great, great, granddaughter' - I am not sure if comma is the right way to go here. I think hyphens should be used.
Yes, you're right. Changed. — Bellhalla (talk) 17:39, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
Post-war: 'Departing from Brest for the last time on 16 December 1918, she headed for Boston, and a period of repairs in the navy yard.' - either incomplete or confusing.
Reworded. — Bellhalla (talk) 17:39, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 
Tucker was acquired by the coast guard on 25 March (according to text) and on 26 March (according to infobox) - something is not right here.
The correct date was 25 March; one of the sources listed the date as "25 Mar 26" which must have been what threw me off. :)  — Bellhalla (talk) 17:39, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars etc.: 

It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 

Overall:
Pass/Fail: 

Thanks - DSachan (talk) 14:06, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
I think I've addressed all points. Thanks for the review. — Bellhalla (talk) 17:39, 15 May 2009 (UTC)