# Talk:Tony DeAngelo

This review is transcluded from Talk:Tony DeAngelo/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Nova Crystallis (talk · contribs) 23:23, 22 June 2021 (UTC)

Reviewing later. Nova Crystallis (Talk) 23:23, 22 June 2021 (UTC)

"He was removed from the ice during the second period of the Sting's January 31 game against the Guelph Storm, and the OHL released a statement on February 14 that DeAngelo would be suspended for eight games following a violation of the league's Harassment and Abuse/Diversity Policy." The year should be added here, and could be removed for the last sentence of the paragraph.
 Done Kncny11 (shoot) 16:23, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
"Despite these incidents," Not mentioned in text.
 Done Kncny11 (shoot) 16:23, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
"director of amateur scouting" Is this a title that should be capitalized?
You would think, but the source used all lowercase! Kncny11 (shoot) 16:23, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
Nothing for his personal life except his political views?
The deeper he falls into extremism, the harder it is to find anything outside of his political views (he also doesn't have a romantic partner or children, which is usually an easy go-to). I found one charity event he participated in in 2018. Kncny11 (shoot) 16:23, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
"US president" should be expanded and linked.
 Done Kncny11 (shoot) 16:23, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
Picked up a 97% using the copyvio tool, but that website seems to be scrapping content from Wikipedia.
That should be it. Nova Crystallis (Talk) 06:13, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

Hey y'all. Another user and I are having a bit of an edit war over the mentioning of DeAngelo's burner Twitter account. They removed it, I put it back, they removed it again, I put it back again. I think it's culturally relevant; it's how I personally found out about Tony DeAngelo's existence. If we're gonna mention DeAngelo's conroversies, I think it's worthwile to include this one. Also I am trying not to assume bad faith but the other user in question's contributions history indicates right-leaning political positions which could indicate motive for wanting to remove that piece from this article. I have my own political positions so that allegation could be pointed back at me and that would be understandable, but from a purely outside-looking-in perspective I think the burner account stuff is worth mentioning. Let me know what y'all think. Thanks :) Qster2323 (talk)  — Preceding undated comment added 19:44, 12 June 2022 (UTC)