# Talk:United States Naval Sea Cadet Corps

Because this describes a rather large youth group and this article only contains a small amount of information about the group, I'm recommending it for expansion, which I'm going to work on. I'd like to add a lot of content, split into seconds, add a table of contents, and work on improving the article in general. Please help! Mike 16:56, 8 May 2006 (UTC)

I'm going to start work on the following sections, if no one objects: About, History, Structure, Activities, and Status. These will contain the existing sections, and offer more flexibility for expansion. Mike 04:49, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
I suggest we add (intact) the section from Sea Cadets into here verbatim to assist your rewrite, Mike.  I don;t see how anyone can object to better information :) If I get the chance before oyu' I'll move it accross into a logical place for you to manipulate. Otherwise be bold Fiddle Faddle 09:42, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
I have done the initial merge from the Sea Cadets page.  It does need tidying still Fiddle Faddle 11:00, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

I'm going to remove the comment about this page being monitored by the USNSCC's Internet Development Group. They have every right to correct factual errors, but this comment gives the impression of official control of this page, and they've gone as far as removing comments about a drop in enrollment in the organization. The user (presumably from the USNSCC's Internet Development Group) who added the monitoring line also made a large number of random, sandbox-like edits to the page, including after some were reverted by a Wikipedia moderator with encouragement to visit the Wikipedia help before continuing. The bottom line is, the user has contributed nothing to the page except add a monitored by line that I believe is inconsistent with Wikipedia's policies, and remove some slightly negative (but unbiased) comments about the group. 67.182.231.23 04:16, 8 May 2006 (UTC)

I figure the section on USNSCC officers needs expansion.  I'll try to expand it when I get the time, unless someone beats me to it.  Just wanted to make apparent that the NSCC Officer corps aren't necessarily military. --Daishi808 23:57, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

the officers section seems to have been deleted Robert Treat (talk) 09:07, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
Yeah that's from 20 years ago Tokeamour (talk) 18:25, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
The ranks are at the bottom, this is an old conversation. Tokeamour (talk) 18:30, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
The section was only an idea it never actually was in the articile, I honestly suggest it be its own articile so feel free to start it. Tokeamour (talk) 18:40, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
@Robert Treat (My other sugestion) Alternatively you or another editor could add a section and have it titled NSCC ranks hopefully this idea gets you thinking  Tokeamour (talk) 21:04, 24 August 2025 (UTC)

Image:ISCA logo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 19:51, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

The images in the ranks table are huge! Can they be reduced to a reasonable small size? Schazjmd (talk) 19:42, 7 July 2025 (UTC)

@Schazjmd Great suggestion absolutely, I will do it in about two hours I'm tired lol. Tokeamour (talk) 20:03, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
Ill try to start doing some immediately  Tokeamour (talk) 20:07, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
Thanks, @Tokeamour. I think they could be much smaller still, but it is an improvement. Schazjmd (talk) 20:20, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
@Schazjmd Ill make them smaller right now Tokeamour (talk) 21:11, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
@Schazjmd Any ideas or does it just need slight modification and then it is ready for B/C++ review? Tokeamour (talk) 21:49, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
It's already rated C. Sorry, I don't have experience with B and above ratings. Schazjmd (talk) 21:55, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
Well any editor who worked on this wouldn't be able to anyways but do you have something you would like to critique so I can improve that issue? @Schazjmd Tokeamour (talk) 21:58, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
I didn't explain myself clearly. I don't have experience with B and above ratings so I can't answer your question about whether it's ready for review. Schazjmd (talk) 22:08, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
You must of mistaken what I said I'm just, asking for you thoughts or input, on what I can correct or expand on, that might be confusing to others when reading it. Tokeamour (talk) 22:16, 7 July 2025 (UTC)

For future reference don't screw around with the short description cause it identifies them as revisions for some reason. Tokeamour (talk) 08:33, 1 August 2025 (UTC)

I'd recommend it be checked out by an administrator to be fixed. Tokeamour (talk) 08:36, 1 August 2025 (UTC)
please view  https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.phptitle=United_States_Naval_Sea_Cadet_Corps&action=history and look for my revision if required. Tokeamour (talk) 08:42, 1 August 2025 (UTC)

@Tokeamour, on July 22 you submitted a GA nomination for this article. In the 2 weeks since then, you have made over 400 edits to this article. There's no way a reviewer could review an article that is in this state of flux. To avoid wasting reviewer's time, I recommend that you withdraw the GA nomination until you are finished working on the article. CodeTalker (talk) 02:50, 4 August 2025 (UTC)

@CodeTalker I'm fully complete now, what are the steps as I have just implemented my last edit. Tokeamour (talk) 02:53, 4 August 2025 (UTC)
I believe this conversation is resolved though can be continued if it is a conflict of interest  Tokeamour (talk) 04:43, 4 August 2025 (UTC)