# Talk:Satyavati

This review is transcluded from Talk:Satyavati/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Bill william comptonTalk   16:09, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
I fixed a couple of minor problems and this is a GA's checklist

GA review (see here for criteria)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it well written?
A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct: 
Excellent
B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation: 

Is it verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check?
A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline: 

B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose): 

C. It contains no original research: 

D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism: 

Is it broad in its coverage?
A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic: 

B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style): 

Is it neutral?
It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each: 

Is it stable?
It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute: 

Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content: 

B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions: 

Overall:
Pass or Fail: 

Mani, Vettam (1975). Puranic Encyclopaedia: A Comprehensive Dictionary With Special Reference to the Epic and Puranic Literature. is cited. --Redtigerxyz  Talk  16:36, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
Oh, that's the Mani, i was confusing with some Hindu scripture.
GA Pass: Article is interesting and worth reading. It was quite easy to review this article due to my knowledge of Mahabharata, but this article certainly adds up a lot. Special congratulation to nominator. Bill william comptonTalk   17:52, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

Raja Shantanu and Matsyagandhi.jpg
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:08, 12 July 2020 (UTC)

The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion:

Vyasa with his mother.jpg
Vyasa.jpg
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 13:02, 1 March 2023 (UTC)