# Talk:Typhoon Jebi

"...known in the Philippines as Typhoon Maymay." This strikes me rather as odd, but I am no expert here. What connection does this
cyclone has with Philippines that it warrants this bold mention? That's not clear from the article. pinging @Meow:. –Ammarpad (talk) 07:29, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

Both the Philippines and Japan name storms near their countries. They do not share the same name list. Rmhermen (talk) 17:44, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
In any case, we could add information for the reasoning behind Jebi being assigned Maymay by PAGASA. I have one already in place.
"By September 2nd, the typhoon was caught on the borders of the Philippine Area of Responsibility, and was assigned the name Maymay by PAGASA despite the typhoon never reaching any land within the Philippines"
Hope that's enough. --SansUT (talk | contributions) 12:52, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
Honestly, I hate that description as Jebi is completely unrelated to the Philippines.-- 🐱💬 14:24, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
It's an unfortunate situation since Jebi accidentally entered the PAR slightly. I say the word "slightly" as the typhoon just entered the border and left without any damageSee that's the problem with the PAR. The size of this giant region cover most of Taiwan which isn't even part of the Philippines, and several islands in Japan, and if they reach that location, then the PAGASA is forced to add their own regional name there.I don't even understand why they have a presence in the Pacific typhoon area when weather bureaus like the Japan Meteorological Agency and the Joint Typhoon Warning Center exist. --SansUT (talk | contributions) 16:53, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
@SansUT: the region also encompasses Taiwan because large systems in that area can greatly enhance the southwest monsoon and wreak havoc in the Philippines (eg Typhoon Morakot). Gives PAGASA an easy way to alert people of impending dangerous weather. ~ Cyclonebiskit (chat) 17:33, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

What's with this name Jebi? This is typhoon number 21 of Heisei 30, not Jebi or Chebi. Typhoons have nothing to do with Korea and Japan doesn't recognize such foolish naming of their typhoons.—240f:31:34b4:1:987:cf27:71f:970a (talk • contribs) 11:05, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

The Japan Meteorological Agency disagrees with you. Rmhermen (talk) 03:34, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
no, this is Typhoon niju ichigou
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E5%B9%B3%E6%88%9030%E5%B9%B4%E5%8F%B0%E9%A2%A8%E7%AC%AC21%E5%8F%B7  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 240F:31:34B4:1:987:CF27:71F:970A (talk) 04:00, 15 September 2018 (UTC) 

Please join a discussion held at Talk:Hurricane Florence#Is this chart unnecessary?.―― Phoenix7777 (talk) 04:57, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

Please note that the image in the above post was removed from this article and linked discussion is for the inclusion/exclusion of all charts of a similar nature. FigfiresSend me a message! 03:05, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

Japan

Fire and Disaster Management Agency report dated August 20, 2019
Insured losses stabilised at US$13–14 billion after loss creep: 1, 2
At least 1.1 trillion yen (though this converts to about US$11 billion)
Look through news from Digital Typhoon
Hirano Shrine: hall of worship was destroyed
>16,000 trees downed in Kyoto Prefecture, damage to elementary school in Kawachinagano City
Forced reevaluation of typhoon response at KIX and HND airports
KIX: inundation of runway, 8,000 stranded passengers and staff
More repairs to KIX
Power losses, damage to KIX, damage to Kyoto Station
Something from Osaka
Alternatively simply translate from corresponding Japanese article
Insured losses at 1.6 trillion yen
Insurance payouts for FY2018-19 highest in recorded history
Possibly more stuff
Support measures from Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries
Russia

September 5: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]
September 6: [6]

~ KN2731 {talk · contribs} 15:24, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Typhoon Jebi (2018)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Hurricane Noah (talk · contribs) 01:21, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
 
Will do tomorrow. NoahTalk 01:21, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

Lead
was an extremely damaging tropical cyclone that became the strongest typhoon to strike Japan since Yancy in 1993 as well as Japan's costliest typhoon I would cut this since the latter half of the sentence explains its damage in more detail.
Jebi formed from a tropical depression south-southwest of Wake Island on August 26 I assume you meant disturbance.
before becoming the twenty-first named storm of the 2018 Pacific typhoon season on August 27. Delete before.
then rapidly intensified as it passed the Northern Mariana Islands on August 30 I would change then to "and later".
Subsequently, Jebi reached peak intensity as a powerful typhoon on August 31 Add "its" before peak. Also, I would rather you say Category 5-equivalent instead of a powerful typhoon as it gives more detail on the intensity and is less subjective than "powerful".
Jebi caused large waves along the coast of Taiwan that caused at least six fatalities I would change that to "resulting in" to vary it up from the previous portion.
and power outages affected storage of livestock and produce Add "the" before storage.
repairs to the bridge only completed seven months later I would replace only with were
Met
Link Coordinated Universal Time on the first mention of UTC.
as Jebi developed maximum sustained winds of 95 km/h (60 mph) I would change Jebi to "its" since the name has already been mentioned. Also, I would say "maximum sustained winds increased to..." rather than developed
The JTWC analysed that Jebi intensified into a super typhoon Could you add a note explaining what the minimum threshold for this status is?
The cycle completed by 21:00 UTC on August 31 while Jebi began to curve northward through a weakness in the subtropical ridge,[17] however drier air then began to impinge on the southern portion on the circulation, resulting in continued weakening. Could you split this after ridge? Also, however should have a comma after it.
causing convection to warm Add its before convection.
As a result, the JTWC assessed that Jebi weakened below super typhoon status at 18:00 UTC on September 1. I would say "had weakened" and "by 18:00 UTC".
despite Jebi maintaining a ragged yet well-defined eye.[22] This should be split off into its sentence. It is also missing a word.
Later on September 3, an extratropical cyclone approaching Jebi from the northwest began to accelerate Jebi north-northeast I would remove the first mention of Jebi.
with the JTWC declaring Jebi no longer a tropical cyclone "Declaring that" and "Jebi was"
before also declaring Change also to later.
Effects
At Kankūjima (the island of Kansai International Airport) I would say "the island where ... is located".
I just changed it to mention KIX only - since the airport covers the entire island there's really no difference. ~ KN2731 {talk · contribs} 14:29, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
significantly higher than Add "which was" before this part.
Restoration works completed fully only on September 20 This is a bit jumbled.
nearby Itami Airport and Kobe Airport --> "the nearby Itami and Kobe Airports" You can maintain links on just the first part of the names.
off Kushimoto, Wakayama Comma after the second part of the location.
That should be it for this article. NoahTalk 23:12, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
@Hurricane Noah: should be done. Hope I didn't miss anything - am somewhat tired now since school's resumed and I have to readjust my sleep cycle. ~ KN2731 {talk · contribs} 14:29, 5 October 2020 (UTC)