# Talk:Sibling Rivalry (Family Guy)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Sibling Rivalry (Family Guy episode)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

This article is in decent shape, but it needs more work before it becomes a Good Article.
Is it well written?
A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct: 
Well done.
B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation: 

Is it verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check?
A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline: 

B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose): 

C. It contains no original research: 
Is TV.com a reliable source?
D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism: 

Is it broad in its coverage?
A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic: 

B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style): 

Is it neutral?
It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each: 

Is it stable?
It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute: 

Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content: 

B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions: 

Overall:
Pass or Fail: 
If the above statement can be answered, I will pass the article. Good luck with improving this article! Also, contact me if the above statements are answered.
--  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 21:01, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

TV.com doesn't look reliable to me - it has links to copyvios on it and is flooded with ads...... Dendodge .. TalkHelp 21:11, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
Okay, TV.com isn't reliable for cultural references and other stuff, but it definitely is to confirm broadcast dates, and mostly for writers of the episode. I can swap to IMDb if you wish (I personally find that a little better). Or, if you want, I can find another site, either way, I'm okay with it. Qst (talk) 00:05, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
Right, I've replaced the TV.com reference with a Tv.Msn.com reference, which appears reliable. I must note, however, that the new Msn reference does not cover the bit in the sentence about who the writer and director is. I can confirm the information is correct, and will be reverted back if ever sneakily changed, not that this is any exception. Qst (talk) 00:11, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
Why not just add the Cite episode template or add the DVD ref.? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 21:18, 22 June 2008 (UTC
Well, it seems more logical to cite a secondary source, rather than episode itself. Qst (talk) 18:07, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
Very true, the source works fine. But, I was just saying about citing the episode/adding the DVD as ref. to the article. Anyways, congrats you know have a GA in your midst. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 18:52, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

Is the serial killer scene a reference to Hit Man?  Does anyone know if the DVD commentary is exhaustive in it's listing of cultural references? Melink14 (talk) 15:15, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

Is the Gavin Dunne credited here the same Gavin Dunne that is the mind behind the Escapists' Miracle of Sound? Schiffy (Speak to me|What I've done) 01:40, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Sibling Rivalry (Family Guy). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150311232029/http://abcmedianet.com/web/dnr/dispDNR.aspx?id=032806_03 to http://abcmedianet.com/web/dnr/dispDNR.aspx?id=032806_03
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:37, 19 June 2017 (UTC)