# Talk:The Haunting Hour: Don't Think About It

Why does it have the flag of Arizona on country, on the movie table  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.162.211.60 (talk) 03:53, 12 October 2008 (UTC) 

This article is more of an AD then an actual article.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.45.45.228 (talk) 23:55, 7 September 2007 (UTC) 
If so, what do you suggest on improvements? --ZSoraz 00:03, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

Should we really give away what happens after they defeat the Evil Thing? I think just finishing it as "...or not?" is enough. Anyone agree or disagree (give a reason :-))? --ZSoraz 02:32, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
The Evil Thing sounds and look like Orga!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sonic,Pikachu,and Snorunt (talk • contribs) 23:38, 1 October 2007 (UTC) 

"This 2000s comedy film-related article..."  Uhh...no. This film is more of a DCOM or a TEENick type horror movie.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by John R. Sellers (talk • contribs) 15:27, 24 September 2007 (UTC) 

It isn't a DCOM or TEENick movie. It is just a regular movie. Tcatron565 22:02, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
My point is that it's far from a comedy.

At the end of the synopsis it says "... or not?"
That doesn't seem very encyclopedic to me.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.29.77.140 (talk) 22:03, 1 October 2007 (UTC) 

It isn't. Tcatron565 22:02, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

Image:Hauntinghour.PNG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 22:10, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

Where does the "Volume One" come from? IMDb doesn't list it. The image in the article doesn't have it. The bolded first mention of the title in the article doesn't have it. Where does the Volume One come from and should it be in the title of this article? -Gohst (talk) 21:53, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

I believe these statements to be false:
The Evil Thing plays a very important part in the story. The Evil Thing appears and acts the way it does because thats how Max imagined it to be. No one really knows it's true form. Like The Bogarts in Harry Potter, It's a shapeshifter so its true form is unknown.
Even if they weren't false, comparing it to Harry Potter isn't very encyclopedic.... of course, neither is the rest of the article either.
But, all that I can really do myself if remove these lines. Here goes. SirVenom (talk) 04:14, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on The Haunting Hour: Don't Think About It. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080706161000/http://www.youngartistawards.org/noms29.html to http://www.youngartistawards.org/noms29.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:41, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Hello, many sources used in this page are not accessible. It must be fixed.—Pórokhov Порох 19:21, 13 December 2018 (UTC)

I don't think there is anything that can be fixed. Webpages don't always stay up indefinitely. SL93 (talk) 21:05, 13 December 2018 (UTC)