# Talk:Hunter v Moss

A thing I was rather surprised not to read in this article is a compare-and-contrast with the decision in Re Goldcorp Exchange Limited (in Receivership), [1995] 1 AC 74.—S Marshall T/C 22:22, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
London Wine is the more common case. Ironholds (talk) 22:50, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

I'm not entirely sure what happens, and why the coat of arms disappears with my changes - please change it. Otherwise, I made some useful changes which it would be good to see back there. Wikidea 08:51, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

It's the change to the court name; the addition of |Court of Appeal (silly template, I know). Everything else seems to be fine, although the external linking of the bailii judgment in the lead seems unnecessary, since it's going to be linked twice elsewhere on the page. Ironholds (talk) 11:57, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
OK. Well, you know I think it's useless to link to the case citation page and it's more convenient for more people to the have bailii link instead, but you wrote it first, so fine. Wikidea 13:50, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the additional text, but citation styles have to remain consistent - if you want to add more, add it in the form currently used. Ironholds (talk) 15:48, 23 May 2011 (UTC)