# Talk:La Grange Historic District (North Carolina)

This review is transcluded from Talk:La Grange Historic District (North Carolina)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: APK (talk · contribs) 09:36, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: 48JCL (talk · contribs) 00:48, 15 May 2024 (UTC)

Hello! I am excited to review this article.
It is reasonably well written.

a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.

a (reference section):   I’m sorry, but the CN tag is an issue for a GAN.
Fixed. APK hi :-) (talk) 05:22, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
Great! That’s a pass. 48JCL (talk • contribs) 16:57, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
b (citations to reliable sources):  sources are reliable! Gov websites are working.
c (OR):  d (copyvio and plagiarism):  This was so tedious to do but thats a pass
It is broad in its coverage.

a (major aspects):  Contains major aspects.
b (focused):   doesn’t really focus on minor aspects. So pass!
It follows the neutral point of view policy.  Nice job! This article strives for the neutral point of view policy.

Fair representation without bias: 
It is stable.

No edit wars, etc.:  Pretty easy pass. Very few authors.
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):   Yep, images are tagged, that’s a pass
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  Captions are fine, however, when you say, 130 South Caswell Stret is one of many commercial buildings in need of repair, do you mean street?
Recommend alt text. @APK
Overall: 
Pass/Fail: 


### Source Check
Forgot to add this! Pretty short article, took like 30 minutes. Passing!


### Final comments
PASSING! But please add alt text lol @APK

Thank you very much. APK hi :-) (talk) 03:48, 20 May 2024 (UTC)