# Talk:Japanese destroyer Take (1944)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Japanese destroyer Take (1944)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs) 09:18, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: Djmaschek (talk · contribs) 01:31, 6 May 2024 (UTC)


### Initial review
After a quick read, the article looks good. A more thorough review will follow shortly. Djmaschek (talk) 01:31, 6 May 2024 (UTC)


### Review 1
GA class = Passed. After writing up the review, I decided to make the changes listed in the last 3 bullet points because they were so minor. Djmaschek (talk) 02:17, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

Well-written.  Done But please see my notes below.
Verifiable.  Done
Broad coverage.  Done
Neutral.  Done
Stable.  Done
Illustrated.  Done
Specs in text match those in infobox.  Done
Construction and career, paragraph 3: This is written correctly. However, when I read it, I was confused by the fact that TA-4 went first followed by TA-3. So, I had to reread it carefully. My suggestion is to change "the troop ships" to "the TA-4 troop ships". This should clear up any confusion in readers like me.
Construction and career, paragraph 4, sentences 6, 7 & 8: The tense suddenly changes from past to present tense. There are 3 words "is" that need to be changed to "was" and one "are" that needs to be changed to "were". (convoy is; are sunk; is badly; Take is not.)
Construction and career, paragraph 5: USS Cooper needs a hyperlink.