# Talk:HMS Sepoy (1918)

This review is transcluded from Talk:HMS Sepoy (1918)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: Simongraham (talk · contribs) 12:57, 8 July 2025 (UTC)
Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs) 19:48, 17 July 2025 (UTC)
I'll get to this shortly--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 19:48, 17 July 2025 (UTC)

Image appropriately licensed
Add the date of sale to the infobox
Added
Do you know when she was paid off after returning to the UK in '32? If so use that date for out of service.
Unfortunately not.
Link yard number
Linked.
Clarify that Red Fleet means the embryonic Soviet Navy
Added.
destroyers Seafire and Sepoy You've already told the reader that they're destroyers
Removed.
When was Sepoy paid off in 1919?
Unfortunately the literature does not say.
Was the deployment to Constantinople part of the Chanak Crisis
Yes. Added.
When were depth charges fitted? And link depth charge in the lede
They were part of the original fit. Added and linked.
but reached the shore safely clarify this
Clarified.
Sorry, I meant "the shore". What do you mean here? Was she beached or are you referring to making it back to port?--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 12:38, 5 August 2025 (UTC)
@Sturmvogel 66: The latter. Clarified. simongraham (talk) 04:10, 6 August 2025 (UTC)
Is that the actual headline from the Straits Times, or is that just a typo?--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 20:27, 4 August 2025 (UTC)
In print, it reads, DESTROYER TRAGEDY OFF HONG KONG. Death-roll now six.
@Sturmvogel 66: Thank you for your excellent review. I believe the changes have been made. Please tell me if there anything else. simongraham (talk) 06:57, 5 August 2025 (UTC)
Suggest adding the depth charges, etc. to the infobox, but I'm going to promote anyway.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 07:53, 6 August 2025 (UTC)