# Talk:HSwMS Loke (1869)

Isn't Motala Verkstad in Motala? Geschichte (talk) 16:53, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

They had a shipyard in Norrköping back then.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 17:14, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:HMS Loke (1869)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Skinny87 (talk) 11:10, 11 October 2010 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose):  b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): 
Lede is slightly anaemic, and could do with another sentence to flesh it out.
I honestly don't know what to add; there's already pretty serious duplication between the lead and the service para.
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 
Do we know why funds were withheld from her when requested?
Not specifically, but probably because it was thought obsolete.
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 

It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 

Overall:
Pass/Fail: 

One small question, possibly unanswerable, and an expansion to the lede, and this will be good to go. Skinny87 (talk) 11:10, 11 October 2010 (UTC)