# Talk:Hurricane Arlene (1963)

Merge refs 5 and 13 with the info from ref 13.  They are the same.  Also, your references, in general, are not uniform, and are missing specific information such as publisher, publishing year, page number (Tucker book).  This will need to be fixed.  Thegreatdr (talk) 19:41, 6 September 2009 (UTC)

Solved the problem with ref 4.  Didn't realize those issues were caused by the List of wettest tropical cyclone page; sorry about that.  They will need to be completely addressed before it tries for any kind of FAC run.  Thegreatdr (talk) 20:15, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
Thankfully I'm not planning to go to FAC with this article Cyclonebiskit (talk) 20:16, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
It's one of those issues that isn't dealt with effectively since list articles don't go through GAN.  Even if they did, this reference issue wasn't an issue with my GAN runs between 2006-2008; the criteria must have gotten stricter.  Thegreatdr (talk) 20:18, 6 September 2009 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Hurricane Arlene (1963)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
The article is close to passage.  The refs are in working order, the article is well-referenced, and I've dealt with the few grammar issues.  The article also appears to have all the sections/information that the TC project requires.  Add the usual line about the name of Arlene not being retired, with an appropriate reference regarding its lack of retirement and the links to other Atlantic storms by that name which the project has written up within wikipedia, and I'll pass the article.  
Reviewer: Thegreatdr (talk) 20:28, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

 Done Cyclonebiskit (talk) 21:01, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
I agree.  I'm passing the article.  Good job.  Thegreatdr (talk) 21:03, 22 October 2009 (UTC)