# Talk:Domentziolus (nephew of Phocas)

Someone put this in the list at WP:GAN, but did not sign or date the nomination and did not place a nomination template on this page. Full instructions are at WP:GAN. If you can't understand them, please ask me. Jezhotwells (talk) 10:16, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

Oops, for some reason I forgot to do so. Thanks for the heads up! Constantine   ✍  16:23, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Domentziolus (nephew of Phocas)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 18:37, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality: 

B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists: 
Refs need place of publication.
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources: 

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary: 

C. No original research: 

Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects: 

B. Focused: 
If nothing is known of his life after 610 then say so.
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias: 

Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc: 

Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales: 

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions: 

Overall:
Pass or Fail: 

Locations added, added statement about lack of any information regarding him after 910. Constantine   ✍  03:59, 8 September 2010 (UTC)