# Talk:Nothhelm

See Nothelm/Temp. --Quuxplusone 00:58, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Nothhelm/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Ironholds (talk) 13:25, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

"it was Nothhelm that gathered materials" - Nothhelm that, or Nothhelm who?
"was an Anglo-Saxon Archbishop of Canterbury in medieval England" - seems a bit extraneous. Just "A medieval English Archbishop of Canterbury"?
"After his death he was considered a saint." - considered a saint, or was he actually sent through the whole kit and kaboodle of the catholic church? if the latter, note it - if the former, add "although he was never.." etc.
Link "pallium"
"He held a synod in 736 or 737, which drew nine bishops. It also adjudicated a dispute over the ownership of a monastery located at Withington" - "He held a synod in 736 or 737, which drew nine bishops and adjudicated a dispute over the ownership of a monastery located at Withington".
"but yet the synod still rendered judgement in the ownership without secular oversight" - clarify?
I've dealt with all of the above, except for the "considered a saint" part. He predates the "formal" procedures - so I've linked to canonization, but the correct term is indeed "considered a saint", as he never went through a formal process, but is still carried on the various lists as a saint. Ealdgyth - Talk 12:54, 9 May 2011 (UTC)