# Talk:Microsoft v. MikeRoweSoft

Removed mrstudios.net hyperlink due to a possible infection by WebAttacker at that site. Would appreciate if others could verify.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.135.54.130 (talk) 20:37, 13 July 2008 (UTC) 

I have passed this article for GA Review. I suggest another thorough round of copy editing if you want to improve it for FAC.--HoboJones (talk) 16:55, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

No one has said much about the article, which I find surprising. That said, while I definitely think this article is very well written and is, in fact, a "Good Article," I feel that the WikiProject flag importance level should be set to "low"...which I am going to take the initiative and just do. Please feel free to correct me if you disagree :P. My justification is simply this: given the nature of the incident and the fact that there hasn't been much activity on the talk page, the article really isn't of that much importance to the internet world - but it IS HILARIOUS :D. Cheers! Danielbullis (talk) 05:31, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Microsoft vs. MikeRoweSoft. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://news.zdnet.co.uk/itmanagement/0%2C1000000308%2C39119181%2C00.htm?r=10
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20031017114024/http://www.mikerowesoft.com/ to http://www.mikerowesoft.com/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:09, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Microsoft vs. MikeRoweSoft. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.theinquirer.net/en/inquirer/news/2004/02/06/mike-rowe-microsoft-auction-over
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090410151751/http://news.zdnet.com/2100-3513_22-133838.html to http://news.zdnet.com/2100-3513_22-133838.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:47, 10 June 2017 (UTC)