# Talk:Milton Blockhouse

This review is transcluded from Talk:Milton Blockhouse/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Ian Rose (talk · contribs) 16:14, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

I'll take this one, probably over the w/e. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 16:14, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
Toolbox check

Two dabs: pike and porter.
No EL issues reported.
Prose/content/structure

Let me know if my copyedit changed any meaning.
I notice "Device plan" links to Device Forts, which is fine, just want to check if "plan" should be capitalised.
Level of detail seems fine for this subject -- poor old fort didn't have much of a career, did it?!
Referencing

Fully cited and sources look reliable.
Formatting generally seems fine although I think you're using hyphens for page ranges and I believe MOS still favours short dashes.
Images

Appropriately licensed/captions.
File:Gravesend defences 1588 Thamesis Descriptio.png doesn't have alt text, although admittedly it's not a requirement.
Look forward to seeing you apply your talents to more articles on Henry's device forts, especially Deal! Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 01:19, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 01:19, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

Changes should be done now; I think that Device plan is probably OK... Deal is definitely on the list! ;) Hchc2009 (talk) 08:49, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
Great -- passing as GA. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 09:05, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
Hey the same can be said for the whole series of Device Fort articles!  Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 11:28, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
This is a great little article, and very well deserving of its new status. Well done!  Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 11:14, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
Thanks Fortuna! Hchc2009 (talk) 11:20, 31 May 2015 (UTC)