# Talk:Diggy Down

This review is transcluded from Talk:Diggy Down/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Carbrera (talk · contribs) 19:49, 27 August 2016 (UTC)


### Comments
The single cover art is unfortunately quite pixelated; a better version of the image that is sized well for Wikipedia is available here
Can you upload the new version of it? Something doesn't work for me :)
I would prefer "from the album Inna and Body and the Sun" instead of its current option with the forward slash "/"
 Done
Since "Empire Music" is listed first in the lead, I would recommend listing it first in the infobox as well
 Done
Remove "on the track." in the second sentence
 Done
"An accompanying music video for the recording was uploaded on 9 December 2014 onto Inna's YouTube channel, with it being shot by Michael Mircea in Bucharest, Romania." --> "An accompanying music video for the recording was uploaded on 9 December 2014 onto Inna's YouTube channel, and was shot by Michael Mircea in Bucharest, Romania."
 Done
"Acclaim" in the lead and "mostly favorable reviews" in the article are a bit contradicting
 Done
"defensing the position" --> "claiming the position"
 Done
"for which the band acts as a featured artist on the song.[1][2]" --> "for which the band is credited as a featured artist.[1][2]"
 Done
The link to "Direct Lyrics" is a redirect
 Done
Remove the link to "saxophone" as it's a pretty common term
 Done
Any other reviews for the track? Two is a fairly small :(
 Not done Sorry, there are no others :(
"defensing the position" --> "claiming the position" again
 Done
"most-aired Romanian song" --> "most-played Romanian song"
 Done
"most-aired song" --> "most-played song"
 Done
"With this occasion, it was revealed that—according to Media Forest's measurements in the first half of 2015—"Diggy Down" was the most aired song on Romanian radio, with its music video as well leading the chart with visuals played the most on Romanian television; they received 4,216 and 5,520 total spins, respectively.[14]" --> Quite long; you could break this up into two sentences
 Done
"The release of "Diggy Down" and its accompanying music video was previewed on 20 November 2014 through a teaser uploaded by Inna on her YouTube channel,[16] following which the visual was released on 9 December 2014 through the same means.[17]" --> Also quite long
 Done
"following which the visual was released on 9 December 2014 through the same means.[17]" --> "The full video was released on 9 December 2014 through the same platform.[17]"
 Done
"floates" --> "floats"
 Done
"The Pussycat Dolls' "Buttons" (2006).[3]" --> "The Pussycat Dolls' 2006 single "Buttons".[3]"
 Done
"eventually losing the distinction to the latter music video.[22]" --> This is technically incorrect since Inna never had the award/distinction to begin with
 Done
The track listing you display is a bit confusing as it seems all four were included on a CD or digital download, when the sources appear otherwise.
 Done
Any credits or personnel available?
 Not done It isn't a big deal to include them, as they're only producing at music video credits, which are already introduced in the article's body.
Use the sort option in the charts so the reader can view the peaks from highest to lowest and vice-versa
 Done
""Diggy Down" was simultaneously released to European digital outlets through Empire Music and Roton on 15 December 2014." --> Only a few sources are needed here; six is a bit too many
 Done
"On 24 July 2015, the song was finally made available for consumption in the United States by the same means.[26]" --> "On 24 July 2015, the song was made available for purchase in the United States by the same means.[26]"
 Done
"vocal collaboration" --> "vocals"
 Done
No dead links Good work!
THX 
On hold until changes have been made. Thank you. Carbrera (talk) 20:10, 27 August 2016 (UTC)

@Carbrera: All done! THX very much for the review. Best, Cartoon network freak (talk) 20:52, 27 August 2016 (UTC)