# Talk:French ironclad Bouvines

This review is transcluded from Talk:French ironclad Bouvines/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Hog Farm (talk · contribs) 02:09, 1 June 2020 (UTC)


### Criteria
1. Prose  On hold
2. Verifiability  Pass
3. Depth of Coverage  Pass
4. Neutral  Pass
5. Stable  Pass
6. Illustrations  Pass
7. Miscellaneous  Pass


### Comments
1. 

Is there a specific reason that the convention of having the subject of article in bold in the first sentence isn't done here?
'Cause I'm an idiot?
"The crew of the Bouvines class numbered 18 officers and 318 ratings; service as a flagship added 5 more officers and 33 more ratings.[2]" - This suggests 336 and 374, the infobox states 333 and 371
Typo, fixed to 15 officers
"The Bouvines class had a full-length waterline armor belt of steel that tapered from the maximum thickness of 464 mm (18.3 in) amidships to 250 mm (9.8 in) at the ship's ends." - Infobox gives 434 for the top number.
"others, including Rear Admiral Chateauminois" - Is his full name known?
"briefly became the flagship of Rear Admiral Ménard" - Is full name known?
" was replaced by Rear Admiral Escande" - Ditto as above
I've been unable to find their first names. None of them are listed in my biographical dictionary of French admirals.
2.

Referencing looks good.
3. 
4.
5.
6.

Licensing looks good.
7.
Placing on hold, just a few things to tighten up.

Thanks for the review.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 12:35, 2 June 2020 (UTC)