# Talk:No Doubt (No Doubt album)

Well I've finished writing this article for now. It's a hell of a lot longer than it was - before I started it consisted of an infobox, one sentence, and a Personnel and Production section. Anyway, I know my writing style isn't that nice, so if anyone feels like re-writing it, go ahead! I've kinda come to the conclusion that there's no way this article could become featured, which was my original aim - I don't think it's significant enough. But anyway, all I can do is my best. Terrafire 22:18, 29 November 2005 (UTC)

I'm trying to get this to Good Article status but I'm having major difficulties find reviews of the album. I have allmusic and - after a long search - Piero Scaruffi. The album was so insignificant very few people reviewed it. If anyone could find a review, please add it or contact me. -- Escape Artist Swyer Talk to me The mess I've made 19:22, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

Hi. :) I'd like to suggest you give a shot at googlebooks. No Doubt didn't make it easy by releasing a self-titled debut (and having a "common phrase" name!), but a search of "No Doubt" + Stefani + 1992, did find me a few things. I got this, for instance. And this. The former is a review. The latter may be mined for more information.
If you haven't worked with googlebooks before, the thing to look for is the words "limited preview", which means you can read some of it. You can get all the information you need except "page number" from the link to the side that says "more about this book". The page number, of course, comes from the main screen. So does the URL, obviously. Truly, googlebooks can be a goldmine. Good luck! --Moonriddengirl (talk) 21:18, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
The relevent info from the latter link is blantantly ripped from the band's official timeline so I already have it. I'll hunt around Googlebooks though. Thanks for the advice. -- Escape Artist Swyer Talk to me The mess I've made 21:33, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
I think the article is pretty good anyway. I'll list at at WP:GAC as soon as the AfD for Trapped in a Box is over. -- Escape Artist Swyer Talk to me The mess I've made 13:52, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it well written?
A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct: 

B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation: 

Is it verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check?
A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline: 

B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose): 

C. It contains no original research: 

D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism: 

Is it broad in its coverage?
A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic: 

B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style): 

Is it neutral?
It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each: 

Is it stable?
It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute: 

Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content: 

B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions: 

Overall:
Pass or Fail: 

It passed. --Be Black Hole Sun (talk) 12:48, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

The image Image:TrappedInABox.ogg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here.  In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page.  Please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
That this article is linked to from the image description page.
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --17:14, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:No Doubt (No Doubt album)/CommentsTalk:No Doubt (No Doubt album)/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
Last edited at 11:21, 27 August 2008 (UTC).
Substituted at 03:16, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on No Doubt (No Doubt album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090223124634/http://www.nodoubt.com/band/ to http://www.nodoubt.com/band/
Added archive https://web.archive.org/20081006220557/http://www.nodoubt.com:80/press/articles/01Bam.asp to http://www.nodoubt.com/press/articles/01Bam.asp
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:17, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on No Doubt (No Doubt album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081203214724/http://www.ocweekly.com/music/music/tunes-and-toons/23963/ to http://www.ocweekly.com/music/music/tunes-and-toons/23963/
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070822201327/http://www.19.5degs.com/album/singles/22128 to http://www.19.5degs.com/album/singles/22128
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.nodoubt.com/press/articles/02OCReg.asp
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:16, 25 December 2017 (UTC)