# Talk:Dan Dworsky

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

If there is not a free use image in the top right corner of the article, please try to find and include one.[?]
Per Wikipedia:What is a featured article?, Images should have concise captions.[?] 
You may wish to consider adding an appopriate infobox for this article, if one exists relating to the topic of the article. [?] (Note that there might not be an applicable infobox; remember that these suggestions are not generated manually)Y--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTD)  15:19, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
If this article is about a person, please add {{persondata|PLEASE SEE [[WP:PDATA]]!}} along with the required parameters to the article - see Wikipedia:Persondata for more information.[?]Y--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTD)  15:19, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (numbers), there should be a non-breaking space - &nbsp; between a number and the unit of measurement. For example, instead of 160 tons, use 160 tons, which when you are editing the page, should look like: 160&nbsp;tons.[?]Y--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTD)  15:40, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Build the web, years with full dates should be linked; for example, if January 15, 2006 appeared in the article, link it as January 15, 2006.[?]Y--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTD)  15:40, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
As per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (headings), please do not link words in headings.[?]Y--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTD)  15:38, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
The script has spotted the following contractions: wasn't, if these are outside of quotations, they should be expanded. 
As done in WP:FOOTNOTE, footnotes usually are located right after a punctuation mark (as recommended by the CMS, but not mandatory), such that there is no space in between. For example, the sun is larger than the moon [2]. is usually written as the sun is larger than the moon.[2][?]Y--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTD)  15:38, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a.[?]
You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTD)  15:11, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
up

GA review (see here for criteria)
Very nice article, and a good read
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose):  b (MoS): 
Looks good except for a few small issues detailed below
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 

It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 
Would have liked to have a bit more on things other than football and architecture, but the information may just not be available
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars etc.: 

It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 

Overall:
Pass/Fail: 
pending some small prose issues, it should pass
Specific issues:

College football section, the first paragraph is only one sentence, and the last paragraph is only two sentences. Such short paragraphs give the prose a choppy feel, and probably would read better if the three paragraphs in this section were combined into just one paragraph.  ResolvedCbl62 (talk) 16:11, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
Same section, for those who are not familiar with the system of letters in high school and college athletics, an explanation of why it is significant that he won six letters in college might be nice.  Will work on thatCbl62 (talk) Linked term. --TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTD)  18:14, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
Career as an architect section, apprenticeship subsection, one sentence paragraph should probably be expanded or merged.Y--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTD)  18:25, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
Same section, Michigan stadium block m subsection. The subsection is only two sentences long. I'd suggest merging it with the previous subsection and titling the newly combined subsection "Work for the University of Michigan" or something similar.  Merged into one sectionCbl62 (talk) 16:11, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
Same section, community service subsection is very short and seems very "tacked on" coming after the two long lists. Perhaps move it above the Major works subsection and expand it if possible? Merged into prior sectionCbl62 (talk) 16:11, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
Walt Disney Concert Hall controversy section. The first paragraph is only two sentences, giving the whole section a choppy feel. Perhaps merge the first paragraph with the second? It's not enough to fail the article, but the feel of the paragraph is very broken.Y--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTD)  18:08, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
Not enough to fail the article, but there is little biographical information on Mr. Dworsky, I'm not sure if that is because it's not available.
I've put the nomination on hold for seven days to let folks address these small issues. It was a joy to read the article, and very interesting. Ealdgyth | Talk 15:44, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

I see some work is being done, let me know when everything is finished! Ealdgyth | Talk 18:53, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
Looks great! I've gone ahead and passed it and am working on the epaperwork now. Ealdgyth | Talk 00:46, 16 January 2008 (UTC)