# Talk:Mississippi Highway 602

This review is transcluded from Talk:Mississippi Highway 602/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: TheWombatGuru (talk · contribs) 23:07, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): 
Good summary. TheWombatGuru (talk) 23:23, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
b (MoS): 
Hancock County, Mississippi, Pearl River County, Mississippi and John C. Stennis Space Center are all three linked two times; the two counties are also linked in the infobox and the major intersections sections. TheWombatGuru (talk) 23:23, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
Removed a link for the space center. The other two are okay, AFAIK.—CycloneIsaac (Talk) 00:23, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): 

b (citations to reliable sources): 
Used reliable logs with an additional map. TheWombatGuru (talk) 23:23, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
c (OR): 

It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): 
Why was the route removed from the state highway system? TheWombatGuru (talk) 23:23, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
Can't find sources for that...can't really interpret more than what's on the map.—CycloneIsaac (Talk) 17:56, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
b (focused): 

It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 

It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): 
No photographs are present. (photographs of still standing route markers, old photographs if available?) TheWombatGuru (talk) 23:23, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
Pictures of roads in Mississippi (that are useable) are extremely rare...and there aren't any for this one.—CycloneIsaac (Talk) 00:44, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Usually they're not required at GA, though we do encourage nominators to try and find some if possible. --Rschen7754 04:34, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 

Overall:
Pass/Fail: 
Not really a comment to this article, but the line of text in the Major intersection section could easily be added to Jcttop as it probably appear in a lot of articles in the same grammatical construction. TheWombatGuru (talk) 23:23, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
This is my first ever review, of course it will need additional reviewers, but I want to learn this stuff, so I thought, let's try it. TheWombatGuru (talk) 23:07, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

@TheWombatGuru: All issues resolved.—CycloneIsaac (Talk) 00:44, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
@CycloneIsaac: Well, then it looks like a Good Article to me. It probably needs another reviewer though, since this was my first review. TheWombatGuru (talk) 12:05, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
It seems fine for GA, though it wouldn't progress any further. --Rschen7754 20:15, 21 December 2014 (UTC)