# Talk:Hue–Da Nang Campaign

Silly question about the lead - was the war still known locally as the "American War" even by 1975? Shimgray | talk | 16:05, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Hue-Da Nang Campaign/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 20:27, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.
Disambiguations: one found and fixed.[1] Jezhotwells (talk) 20:34, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
Linkrot: none found. Jezhotwells (talk) 20:34, 1 March 2011 (UTC)


### Checking against GA criteria
GA review (see here for criteria)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose):  b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): 
Well written and organized.  I made a number of minor copy-edits.[2]
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 
I formatted one citation (ref#1); assume good faith for all off-line sources.
I removed the EL, as per WP:EL, as it is already used as ref#1
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 
Sufficeinet detail and focus.
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 
NPOV
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 

It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 
Suitable captions and rationales for non-free use.
Overall:
Pass/Fail: 
An excellent article. I am happy to list this as a good article. Jezhotwells (talk) 20:56, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
Thank you very much for assessing the article.Canpark (talk) 07:51, 2 March 2011 (UTC)