# Talk:Halo: The Fall of Reach

Has anyone noticed the resemblence of Halo with the well known novel "ringworld" by Larry Niven, written in 1970? Is there a possible copy situation?

It’s mentioned as an influence in the main Halo article. —FlooK 17:38, 5 September 2005 (UTC)

Is it just me or does the picture on the front cover have tomato sauce on the letters or something? TostitosAreGross 01:16, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

Yes, you're right... I've taken that picture and I'm afraid to say that's a drop of my own blood... I got a small cut on one of my fingers that day and I didn't notice (until it was too late) some blood had gotten on the book's cover. When I get the time I'll try to take a new picture, or you could replace it if you have a good one. Berserker79 08:36, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

The following is incorrect; the beggining of the novel is in the JERICO IV system and the end of the novel (not the epilogue) is in the Epeson Eradi system, on Reach. Please fix! --xFaithfulx 05:48, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

Moved above quote from main page. --DevastatorIIC 11:18, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

on page 135 in the book Eric Nylund put USNC instead of UNSC, check it out
Though this is only a possible error, I have noted that in every UNSC "transmission" any time the letters FI are beside each other in a word, like "debriefing" they are omitted. For example, debriefing shows as "debrie  ng." I'll admit that I've not yet finished the book, so I don't know if it is explained later (I'm on Page 214), but it is starting to bug me.--Eldritch2k4 02:28, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

On page 135 "USNC Military Laws Article" sounds like a plain typo. There's a number scattered throughout the text, can't remember them all. Don't remember any missing "fi" in words such as debriefing, but that's another plain typo. Berserker79 16:38, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
It seems an odd typo, since it occurs every time (save one on page 141, the word "CLASSIFIED"] there is a UNSC transmission in Sections 1 through 4; on page 56 five times, page 57 three times, page 58 twice (and one omission of the letters "fl"), page 135 twice, page 136 once, page 141 twice, page 214 three times. The most common one is "/start file/" and "/end file/" which show as "/start le/" and "/end le," respectively. I guess it could be a word processing error in the first four sections, like they were auto removing notes. I've got the First Edition: November 2001 paperback version of the book. --Eldritch2k4 02:56, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
That's curious, I've got a November 2001 first edition (paperback), but it doesn't contain all the typos you mentioned. The "USNC" on page 135 is there, but the various instances of "/start file/" and "/end file" are printed without missing letters. Could it be possible you own a copy of the book which had a few problems during its printing? Berserker79 12:23, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
I'm sitting on a November 2001 printing with every error mentioned. Would a barcode number help decypher where it was actually printed? 9 780345 451323  50799 OPM starts at 29 and ends at 22 ... At least the missing fi's aren't in the main text as well. EldrickTobin 10:31, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
I've just read the books and it seems that those little "errors" are in my book, too. I thought that was actually part of the book. I thought that when the encryption process occured, for some odd reason the "fi" got left out. I don't know. That is just what it seems like to me. I could be wrong and it could be a publishing mistake. Anonomous 8:45, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
I never noticed it before...i doubt that Nylund consistently and convienently forgot to put the letters "fi" in each report thingy...suggest it is on purpose. Matthew 18:33, 14 March 2008 (UTC)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 10minnickm (talk • contribs) 

After a few fixes this article will be ready for GA status.

"he worked between two and four hours each morning" is not exactly needed in the article. Try and find a way to edit that out of the article.
"declaring humanity's destruction the will of the gods" Add as between the words: destruction and the.
There is not a single refrence in the lead. See Wikipedia: Lead
When these fixes are preformed inform me on my talkpage.Gears Of War 22:19, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the review. I changed the sentence to "A seven week deadline was established for Nylund to write the book throughout which he worked on the book daily." is that ok or is the daily work totally unnecessary? I've also tried to address the other 2 issues (diff). James086Talk | Email 11:18, 21 May 2008 (UTC)


### GA pass
The advice was given above the corrections are done, now ready for GA status.Gears Of War 21:53, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

Thanks! James086Talk | Email 02:22, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Whoever keeps removing the section about Halo: Reach really needs to explain their actions. It looks like Reach will be based quite a bit on this book, and that makes it VERY relevant.
"Speculation". I disagree. I will try and find the specific scene from the book(s) that is shown in the announcement trailer and cite it. Until then, I won't push the issue. Dashren2001 (talk) 18:29, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

I'll save you time and tell you that the events of the Reach trailer never appear in The Fall of Reach. We have no clue what Reach will have or include (or even if they will retcon certain elements of the canon.) Without reliable sources, adding in info about Reach is original research. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs(talk) 00:07, 11 December 2009 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Halo: The Fall of Reach. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080105123852/http://www.gamecritics.com/feature/report/halofallreach/page01.php to http://www.gamecritics.com/feature/report/halofallreach/page01.php
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070120143222/http://www.gamecritics.com/feature/report/halofallreach/page02.php to http://www.gamecritics.com/feature/report/halofallreach/page02.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:22, 28 October 2017 (UTC)