# Talk:Logical reasoning

This review is transcluded from Talk:Logical reasoning/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Non-pegasus (talk · contribs) 23:54, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

 
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a. (prose, spelling, and grammar): 

b. (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): 

It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a. (reference section): 

b. (citations to reliable sources): 

c. (OR): 

d. (copyvio and plagiarism): 

It is broad in its coverage.
a. (major aspects): 

b. (focused): 

It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 

It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): 

b. (appropriate use with suitable captions): 

Overall:
Pass/fail: 

(Criteria marked  are unassessed)
Hi Phylsph7. Thank you for your work on the Logical reasoning wiki. I have completed the initial review. I've put it on hold because of a copyright question-mark concerning the Versailles propaganda poster. More details in the comments on 6b. All else was a pass. Please correct or update the image. The caption was good and relevant and I would hate to see you not add any image to your "As a skill" section over a copyright concern especially when propaganda examples are easy to access. Case in point, the top item in the "Did you know..." section for 18 April 2023 is an example of propaganda you could use. That wiki in fact discusses the logical merits of that British recruitment poster and would be a good example to use in the stead of the Versailles poster. Let me know if you have any questions. I will likely update the review within 24 hours of your corrections.
Non-pegasus (talk) 00:07, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

Hello Non-pegasus and thanks for your review! I'm glad that you caught the recently flagged copyright problem for the image of the Versailles poster. Your suggestion works fine as an alternative so I replaced the image and slightly modified the text. Please let me know if other issues catch your eye. Phlsph7 (talk) 07:49, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
I've updated the review, congratulations on your newest Good Article!
A bot will add the good article icon to the article and will remove the nomination from the GA nominations page. This bot should also use GANotice to send you a message that the article has passed. I have added Logical reasoning to the list of "Philosophy" Good articles under the "Philosophy and Religion" section. Well done 🦄 Non-pegasus (talk) 11:12, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

@Phlsph7 In what application were you testing the preview? In my case (Telegram), the SVG is shown. Yes the current wiki source code is hacky, but it works :) PhotographyEdits (talk) 17:58, 26 May 2023 (UTC)

@PhotographyEdits: I was referring to the regular preview function on the desktop version when hovering over a wikilink or in the search results. I saw you added the template "CSS image crop". It seems this solved the problem. Thanks for figuring it out! Phlsph7 (talk) 18:21, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
@Phlsph7 Ah I see! You're welcome. I wish there was some real feature to make it hidden except for the preview, but I haven't been able to find it. PhotographyEdits (talk) 18:48, 26 May 2023 (UTC)