# Talk:Darkness Falls (The X-Files)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Darkness Falls (The X-Files)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: ♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:10, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
Will begin read through and initial review within 24 hours.♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:10, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

Plot
"The next morning, they find an old growth tree cut down, with a green ring contained within. Old "growth" tree and green ring. What do you mean by growth tree and green ring. Green tree ring inside the bark you mean rather than an actual green finger ring?

To be honest, I don't know what the "old growth" thing means, but it's used in dialogue. I'll research that to try and clarify it. As for the ring, it's an actual band of green between the tree's growth rings, which I'll clarify now. GRAPPLE X 11:49, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
That's better, thanks.♦ Dr. Blofeld 12:04, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
Production
"The episode was intended to be a bottle show" What is a bottle show?
"The moods of many of the crew had grown quite tense towards the end of the shooting schedule" a little awkward, maybe The atmosphere amongst the crew grew quite tense.
T"he moods of many of the crew had grown quite tense towards the end of the shooting schedule, resulting " Resulting implies they had an argument because the mood was tense. Maybe culminating in an argument?♦ Dr. Blofeld 12:10, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
Addressed GRAPPLE X 12:29, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality: 
B. MoS compliance: 
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources: 
B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary: 
C. No original research: 
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects: 
B. Focused: 
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias: 
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc: 
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales: 
B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions: 
Overall:
Pass or Fail: 
Good job. Swiftly addressed!  Obviously this article would need a great amount of work if this is to ever become an FA but it meets the GA criteria and in the same format as the others . ♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:15, 14 August 2011 (UTC)

Thanks again for your time! I really appreciate the effort you put into these reviews. GRAPPLE X 12:37, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Darkness Falls (The X-Files). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111030064422/http://tv.ign.com:80/articles/870/870608p3.html to http://tv.ign.com/articles/870/870608p3.html
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.ema-online.org/EMA-1994AwardWinners.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:54, 6 December 2016 (UTC)