# Talk:Galulatherium

This review is transcluded from Talk:TNM 02067/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Sasata (talk) 13:57, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
Hi Ucucha, I've signed up to review this article on a bone fragment. Comments in a day or two. Sasata (talk) 13:57, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the review. Ucucha 16:20, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
Looks good-only a few minor suggestions:

suggest adding dates for the geological eras on first usage (at least in the lead)
Added in the lead.
"In 2007, Stevens and colleagues"  perhaps give his full name, to be consistent with  "David Krause" earlier
Nancy.
"It preserves much of the body," I'm not sure what this means
Clarified, I hope.
"…all of which are known from the Cenozoic, less than 65 million years ago, only." It's somewhat awkward to have that "only" stuck at the end of the sentence as a clause by itself.
Moved "only" up a few words.
Everything in order, promoting now. Sasata (talk) 16:46, 23 August 2010 (UTC)