# Talk:Kek Lok Si

The article says it is the largest buddhist temple in southeast asia but I believe  Angkor Wat holds that distinction.Pwordisony (talk) 11:56, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

Angkor Wat is an ancient and ruined Hindu temple and not a Buddhist temple.--Nvvchar. 11:47, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Kek Lok Si/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Muffin Wizard (talk · contribs) 11:18, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

I will do a review on this article as soon as possible, but please be patient. :)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar):  b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): 
Good.
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 
All references used are reliable sources, seems fine.
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 
Good.
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 
Seems neutral.
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 
Seems fine, I see no edit war.
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 
I see all images are available freely to use.
Overall: After a frequent more check to the article, I see there is no more problem, so I give it a passed, thanks for all your time to work on this article. :)
Pass/Fail: