# Talk:NSB Class 64

This review is transcluded from Talk:NSB Class 64/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 22:27, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.
Disambiguations: none found.
Linkrot: none found. Jezhotwells (talk) 22:29, 5 July 2011 (UTC)


### Checking against GA criteria
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose):  b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): 
The article is reasonably well written.  I made some copy-edits for gammar and clarity.
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 
I assume good faith for off-line sources, which appear reliable. No evidence of OR
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 
Sufficient detail and focus
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 
NPOV
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 
Stable
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 
One image used, licensed and captioned.
Overall:
Pass/Fail: 
This article sufficiently meets the criteria so I am happy to list it. Congratulations. Jezhotwells (talk) 22:44, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for taking the time to review the article. Arsenikk (talk) 08:01, 7 July 2011 (UTC)