# Talk:Euthymides

Could it please be clarified whether the article is written in British or American English?

...whose work was characterised by a detailed study of anatomy... "Characterised" is British spelling.
...leaving the foreground rendered by the negative space in the natural color of the clay.  "Color" is American spelling.
MSincccc (talk) 16:06, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

British English. I've added the relevant template and fixed the typo of "colour". UndercoverClassicist T·C 16:51, 23 May 2025 (UTC)
The article was an enjoyable read. I went through the prose and found it perfectly fine. Best of luck with the GA nomination. MSincccc (talk) 17:01, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Euthymides/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: UndercoverClassicist (talk · contribs) 10:08, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Reviewer: AmazingAce123 (talk · contribs) 17:24, 3 July 2025 (UTC)

I believe this article qualifies as a GA.
This article is 1. well-written, 2. verifiable, 3. broad (covering both the artist's biography and the highlights of overall artistic movement), 4. neutral, 5. stable and 6. illustrated. 
It might be worth expanding on his selection of compositions - the Italian version of the article does this well. Adding subheadings could also help readers more easily skim to the relevant sections. That said, both suggestions are ultimately matters of personal opinion, so I leave them to the author’s discretion.
Well done on your article overall - I particularly enjoyed the way you summarized the red-figure style and contrasted it with the pre-existing black figure style. Beautiful work!


### Sources
All sources are certainly reliable for the purposes for GA. Spot check from this revision:

[4] Y
[8a] Y
[12a] Y
[16] Y Although I would also explicitly reference page 51.
[17] Y
[18] Y
[19] Y
[23] Y
All looks good. Accordingly passing on CLOP/OR, and after a brief look within used sources and elsewhere, broadness. I'll leave you some optional suggestions that go past the GA criteria:

You can link the Internet Archive's copy of The Grove Encyclopedia of Classical Art and Architecture.
Your spelling for Encylopedia may also be adjusted, as I don't see a copy of the book which uses the Encyclopaedia spelling.
I think for Keuls (2011) just keep it simply as 1997. The actual book doesn't identify itself as a 2011 edition, and entering the ISBN you give in Worldcat simply gives the original 1997 edition.
Rollinginhisgrave (talk | contributions) 14:34, 8 July 2025 (UTC)

Thanks, Rollinginhisgrave -- all done as suggested. UndercoverClassicist T·C 15:59, 8 July 2025 (UTC)