# Talk:Loose Fur

I've got more research that I'm currently doing to add more information to the page, which (when finished) will be significantly longer than the version that's up now. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by MWB1138 (talk • contribs) .

The length doesn't matter; the band doesn't meet the requirements in WP:MUSIC.  I've also taken down the {{hangon}} tag, as you've already created your response. Rory096 17:29, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
I believe it does meet the requirements of WP:MUSIC so I took down the speedy tag: we should give MWB the chance to make the article better at the very least.  Check out [1] for proof of notability.  This band also meets several other requirements.  Mangojuice 17:34, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
Thanks Mangojuice for the welcome and the help.  This is the first article I've created, so I've got a lot to learn, but I think this will be a decent article when I'm done.  Should information about the individual albums (such as track-listings) be included in this article, or should it go somewhere else? MWB1138 17:46, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
First a note: I'm not really a big music-editor, so I'm not as familiar with the conventions as others may be.  I'm glad to see you're interested in the conventions, though, so let me direct you to Wikipedia:WikiProject Music, where there is a lot more written on the subject.  From what I gleaned on skimming it, albums are worth their own page, and song lists can be there, but for a group with only one or two albums, you don't HAVE to create a separate page for the albums, it's probably reasonable to have albums and song lists as a section on the band's page.  Individual songs, however, are generally not notable unless they're particularly special, so shouldn't get their own article.  In this case, I think you can probably put that info in this article, at least for now, and separate them out if the article gets too big and needs separating.  Welcome again! Mangojuice 18:27, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

This article meets all criteria and I have passed it.  Vikrant Phadkay 15:45, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

Since both  Wilco and  Loose Fur have categories in them which cause them to be included set of articles that are tagged by bot with {{ChicagoWikiProject}}, it might make sense for the band members and related discographies to have similar categories.  I was looking at  Jeff Tweedy and noticed that he has Category:People from Belleville, Illinois and Category:Illinois musicians in his article.  If he had Category:People from Chicago or Category:Chicago musicians in his article then he would be tagged with {{ChicagoWikiProject}} and thus they would fall under WP:CHICAGO.  As WP:CHICAGO director, I would like to monitor these musicians, but I generally leave category decision to the editors of the pages.  Please make whatever category decisions you feel would be correct with this in mind for all band members, the bands and all discographies.
I am placing this message several places. I am asking all respondents to respond at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Alternative_music#Wilco_and_Loose_Fur_bandmembers_and_discographies.

Image:Loosefur.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 02:31, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

This discussion is transcluded from Talk:Loose Fur/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.
I am doing the GA Reassessment on this article as part of the GA Sweeps project.
I am concerned that the article is not up to date.  I see one reference to contributors to the band from 2007 with nothing since then.  Is there anything else to the band's resume since 2007?  Have they recorded another album, gone on tour, added/removed members?  I am also concerned that 7 links in the references section are dead.  In fact there are only 3 links that are active in the refs.  The dead links are: 3, 6, 16, 18, 19, 20, and 23.  Also the Loose Fur and Drag city link is dead.  I will hold the article for a week to see if fixes can be made.  Please contact me on my talk page if you have questions.  H1nkles (talk) 15:17, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
The following is copied from H1nkles talk page...
Greetings. You recently reviewed Loose Fur for GA sweeps. Loose fur has neither toured nor put out any new material since 2007; since the band is a side project, the members are usually busy with their own projects. You brought up an interesting problem, however. I checked all of the links, and they're fine. Puzzled by this, I ran the page through Checklinks and it came back with the same results that you did [2]. I checked another article that uses Billboard citations and found that the problem is with Checklinks, not with the article citations. Teemu08 (talk) 17:24, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

Based on this information I will keep the article at GA.  H1nkles (talk) 19:58, 15 June 2009 (UTC)