# Talk:Kung Fu Chaos

The list of playable characters were all bolded. I did not see the point of that (there weren't any other text around it; no need for emphasis), so I've taken the liberty of removing the bold formatting. --That Jason 04:11, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

How is Shao Ting a playable character? Could some-one kindly explain this?Atomic45 21:39, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

Umm, long time since i played but it's one of the unlockables. J.J.Sagnella 21:57, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
OK, also I think the name is a nice pun, Shao Ting, Shouting. Atomic45 23:20, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Image:Kung Fu Chaos Image.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 23:58, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Kung Fu Chaos/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: ProtoDrake (talk · contribs) 10:25, 18 July 2023 (UTC)

 

I'll take on this review. You can expect more extensive comments within the week. I will say initially that the citation style is a bit all over the place, with missing information (access dates, incomplete titles), and the entire characters section is uncited and seems unnecessary. --ProtoDrake (talk) 10:25, 18 July 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for your time reviewing this article. This is a first GA nomination, so I still have a lot to learn - including, as is self-evident, good citation management! I have removed the characters section and begun the task of standardising the citations, including adding checking urls and adding access dates for those citations I added in the article. Thanks again and welcome any feedback to improve the page. ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 08:20, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
@Vrxces: I'm very sorry for the delay, this slipped off my stack. I've looked through the article again, and congratulate you on the improvements you've made. This is a decent look for a good article, and I'm okay giving this a Pass. --ProtoDrake (talk) 06:57, 31 July 2023 (UTC)

Not a problem! This is my first GA so thanks very much. Appreciate your review. ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 09:22, 1 August 2023 (UTC)