# Talk:Old Bridge, Pontypridd

This review is transcluded from Talk:Old Bridge, Pontypridd/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Starting review.Pyrotec (talk) 13:12, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

An interesting, well-sourced, article.
Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality: 

B. MoS compliance: 

Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources: 

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary: 
I've changed some templates, because published books were being used as sources not web sites, despite the use of GoogleBooks as "web" sources.
C. No original research: 

Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects: 
The references provide additional information that would allow the scope to by partially extended (see below), but the current scope appears to be adequate.
B. Focused: 

Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias: 

Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc: 

Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales: 

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions: 

Overall:
Pass or Fail: 

Overall this article is at GA-level so I'm awarding GA status.
There is some scope for adding a bit more information about the bridge, for instance the steps shown in the picture are later additions and there is a bit more information about the difficulties for non-pedestrian users of the bridge, but this does not detract too much and does not prevent GA status from being awarded.Pyrotec (talk) 10:38, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Old Bridge, Pontypridd. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090717220816/http://webapps.rhondda-cynon-taff.gov.uk:80/heritagetrail/taff/pontypridd/pontypridd.htm to http://webapps.rhondda-cynon-taff.gov.uk/heritagetrail/taff/pontypridd/pontypridd.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 03:18, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Old Bridge, Pontypridd. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080516214738/http://www.therhondda.co.uk/general/ystradyfodwg.html to http://www.therhondda.co.uk/general/ystradyfodwg.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 13:28, 24 February 2016 (UTC)