# Talk:HMS Fearless (H67)

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.naval-history.net/xGM-Chrono-10DD-23F-Fearless.htm. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 18:45, 31 August 2011 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:HMS Fearless (H67)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Parsecboy (talk · contribs) 14:04, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

Will get to this one shortly. Parsecboy (talk) 14:04, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose):  b (MoS): 
No dupe links
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 

It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 

It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 

It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 
You might want to add a photo of a SM.79 to the last section - readers might be interested in the type of aircraft that sank the ship. This one might be a good choice, given that it's carrying a torpedo in the photo.
Overall:
Nothing to hold up promotion, great work. Parsecboy (talk) 18:28, 29 October 2015 (UTC)