# Talk:Lest We Forget: The Best Of

Many of the tracks say "From (album)",maybe it should be made clear that these were not "edited outro" (ref to Tourniquet) etc, rather, they were all re-recorded for this release. No original tracks except Personal Jesus are on it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.131.43.217 (talk) 02:58, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

Image:Marilyn Manson - Lest We Forget The Best of.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 06:03, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Image:Lest we forget cover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 22:41, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Lest We Forget: The Best Of. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110814222945/http://www.disqueenfrance.com/fr/pag-259165-CERTIFICATIONS.html?year=2004&type=8 to http://www.disqueenfrance.com/fr/pag-259165-CERTIFICATIONS.html?year=2004&type=8
Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20111018011407/http://www.infodisc.fr/CDCertif_O.php?debut=1800 to http://www.infodisc.fr/CDCertif_O.php?debut=1800
Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/6DaMNbmDo to http://www.bpi.co.uk/certifiedawards/search.aspx
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:34, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Lest We Forget: The Best Of. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120915002134/http://www.snepmusique.com/fr/pag-259165-CERTIFICATIONS.html?year=2004&type=8 to http://www.snepmusique.com/fr/pag-259165-CERTIFICATIONS.html?year=2004&type=8
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:58, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

Not going to bother arguing whether he belongs to the genre or not, but I'm not sure if we should assume they mean goth rock from the description from Rolling Stone. Like, I wouldn't doubt it could mean that, but it could just mean goth sensibilities, etc. Its not entirely clear to me and per WP:STICKTOSOURCE, we should not interpret genres in that kind of way. Thoughts? Andrzejbanas (talk) 18:41, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Lest We Forget: The Best Of/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Ssven2 (talk · contribs) 08:04, 3 April 2018 (UTC)

I will review this article. Thank you.  — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 08:04, 3 April 2018 (UTC)

Comments
"The deluxe version of the record included bonus DVD" — "included "a" bonus DVD". Add the "a" there.
"Commercially, the compilation out-performed expectations in the United States" — Write it as "The compilation's commercial performance exceeded expectations in the United States"
"had sold over a million copies by late 2010" — Write it as "had sold over a million copies as of late 2010"
"Internationally, it was also successful" — Write it as "It was also successful internationally,".
Alt texts are needed for the images.
Who's "the band's frontman"? Manson? If so, just write his surname there instead.
"includes a DVD of sixteen of the band's music videos" — Write it as "includes a bonus DVD containing sixteen of the band's music videos"
I'll look at the sources tomorrow.  — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 09:19, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors: 

B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists: 

Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. Has an appropriate reference section: 

B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary: 

C. No original research: 

Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects: 

B. Focused: 

Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias: 

Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc: 

Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content: 

B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions: 

Overall: Passed, my queries were met and solved by the nominator.
Pass or Fail: 

Thank you for addressing my comments, MagicatthemovieS. Congratulations, the article has passed.  — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 11:24, 5 April 2018 (UTC)