# Talk:Firewalker (The X-Files)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Firewalker (The X-Files)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Gen. Quon (talk · contribs) 03:10, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose):  b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): 
In the lead, there is no mention of production. I would add some thing.
Cite where you got the guest star information from.
Did The A.V. Club give the episode a grade? If so, what was it?
"The Rest" (as opposed to Bad or Essential). Don't know if it can be included. igordebraga ≠ 02:46, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 

It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 

It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 

It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 
The picture in the production section says "Howard Gordon was inspired by a NASA exploration project and Heart of Darkness." but his quote/paragraph gives the effect that he was alluding to Heart of Darkness, not directly inspired by it.

Overall:
Pass/Fail: 

On hold for seven days to straighten out issues.--Gen. Quon (talk) 20:10, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

I see User:Igordebraga made several of the suggested changes, thanks. I've tweaked the caption and alt text a little. Dunno if the AVC grade makes sense to add, as it only really works in context and adds nothing beyond defining the episode as "mediocre", which has already been explained through quotation. Thanks for taking the time to look at this one. GRAPPLE X 02:56, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
OK, looks good! I pass! Congrats.--Gen. Quon (talk) 15:26, 14 February 2012 (UTC)