# Talk:German torpedo boat T35

This review is transcluded from Talk:German torpedo boat T35/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: CPA-5 (talk · contribs) 12:55, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
Claim!!! My turn to review one of those ships. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 12:55, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

was allocated to the United States after the war Unlink the US.
ships a maximum speed of 33.5 knots (62.0 km/h; 38.6 mph) Is it posible to round the nought? Also unlink km/h and mph.
Unlinked, not possible to get rid of the trailing oughts in multi-unit conversions unless both of them have a trailing ought.
together with eight 2 cm (0.8 in) C/38 guns Shouldn't it be ".8 in"?
The leading ought helps people from missing the decimal point.
against advancing Soviet forces near Cranz Pipe Soviet to the Soviet Union.
The boat was allocated to the United States when the Allies divided Unlink the US and link Allies.
heavy cruiser is overlinked.
No links for both FuMO and FumB in the article?
Forgotten that I'd created an article on the FuMO 21 radar. Nothing particular on the German radar detectors so I just used a generic link.
@Sturmvogel 66: And how about FumB? Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 13:26, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
I linked to radar detector since I'm not sure exactly what German types she actually had.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 14:00, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
Infobox

"1,294 t (1,274 long tons) (standard)" Link both tonnes.
"32,000 shp (24,000 kW)" Link kW.
The body doesn't use shafts of the infobox?
"33.5 knots (62.0 km/h; 38.6 mph)" Is it posible to round the nought?
"1 × quadruple, 2 × twin 2 cm (0.8 in) AA guns" Shouldn't it be ".8 in"?
No armour?
Nope. Little boys like destroyers and smaller generally don't have any armor.
No edit wars.
Sources

Rohwer's title should be "Chronology of the War at Sea, 1939-1945: The Naval History of World War II" Unless your edition says something else?
My copy spells out "Two"
No ORs.
The sources are reliable and are academic.
Image

Looks fine to me.
That's anything from me. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 12:05, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for the review, CPA.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 11:34, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
Looks good to me, I'll pass it. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 22:37, 12 September 2019 (UTC)