# Talk:Hurricane Charlie (1951)

Article is almost there...a little more on impact would be nice, but mostly it just needs to be copyedited. Jdorje 05:07, 11 January 2006 (UTC)

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality: 

B. MoS compliance: 

Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources: 

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary: 

C. No original research: 

Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects: 

B. Focused: 

Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias: 

Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc: 

Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales: 

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions: 

Overall:
Pass or Fail: 

Nice job, CapeVerdeWave, this article had been sitting there forever and was not getting expanded. You did a nice job. I really suggest sending this to PR then FAC. This is the definition of a great 1950s storm. Passes all criteria.Mitch32contribs 21:16, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Hurricane Charlie (1951). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110525204524/http://www.aoml.noaa.gov/hrd/hurdat/mwr_pdf/1951.pdf to http://www.aoml.noaa.gov/hrd/hurdat/mwr_pdf/1951.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:09, 6 April 2017 (UTC)