# Talk:HMS Mosquito (1910)

This review is transcluded from Talk:HMS Mosquito (1910)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Zawed (talk · contribs) 22:36, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
I will review, comments to follow in due course. Zawed (talk) 22:36, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
Lead

No issues identified
Design and Development

This also reduced costs, : "also" is used later in this sentence, suggest deleting the quoted instance
Deleted.
The mention of G class at the end of the first paragraph should be hypenated for consistency with the lead
The format depends on whether it is a noun (no hyphen) or adjective (hyphen).
length, beam and draught dimensions inconsistent with infobox, ditto installed power
Good spot. Amended.
the text also refers to "three 3 in (76 mm) QF 12-pounder 12 cwt guns" but the "3 in" is missing from the infobox
Added.
Construction and career

No mention of commissioning although this is stated in the infobox as being in August 1910
Oops. Amended.
in the Beagle's forming the: this threw me initially, but I think you mean the class of Beagles? Suggest revising this to make it clearer
Fixed.
Mosquito left Plymouth: no antedence for Plymouth
Clarified.
Second Division of the Fifth Flotilla and based in Alexandria: "Fifth Destroyer Flotilla"?
Added.
Bibliography/Source checks

"Volume" is inconsistently presented in the two Corbett refs
Corrected, along with the publisher name.
There is an errant ampersand in Note 11. Ditto Note 42
Removed.
Dittmar listed but doesn't seem cited. Same for Moore, Same for Parkes
Removed Moore and added statements from Dittmar & Colledge and Parkes & Prendergast
The link for Monograph No. 4 doesn't work
Fixed.
Checking Note 24, this doesn't say that Mosquito was one of the three destroyers sent to the southern end of the Straits of Messina
Amended to relevant service.
Notes 10, 26 and 27 check out OK
Other stuff

One dupe link: Fairfield Shipbuilding and Engineering Company
Removed.
Image tag OK
Spotted a few obvious typos as I went along and corrected these, otherwise that's it for me. Zawed (talk) 11:44, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
@Zawed: Thank you for such an excellent review. I have made the changes. simongraham (talk) 07:58, 9 January 2024 (UTC)

This looks all good so am passing as GA as I believe the article meets the necessary criteria. Cheers, Zawed (talk) 03:21, 16 January 2024 (UTC)