# Talk:Hurricane Fernanda (1993)

At least a "C" in my opinion, probably higher. --Dil Hoom Hoom Kare 19:37, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Hurricane Fernanda (1993)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Xtzou (Talk) 20:58, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
Hi, I am reviewing this article. The only problem I find is that ref 13 (used twice in the article) is dead. Otherwise, great job! Xtzou (Talk) 20:58, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality: 

B. MoS compliance: 

Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources: 

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary: 
Ref 13 (used twice) is a dead link and is not in the Internet Archive.

C. No original research: 

Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects: 

B. Focused: }

Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias: 

Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc: 

Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales: 

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions: 

Overall:
Pass or Fail: 

Just needs the ref fixed.  Xtzou (Talk) 20:58, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
I've fixed the dead linked. Mm40 (talk) 21:21, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for taking care of that. ♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 01:16, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
Congratulations! Article passes. Xtzou (Talk) 16:39, 21 April 2010 (UTC)