# Talk:Jan Zamoyski

Nie lepiej go przesunac pod Jan Zamoyski?--Emax 22:16, 20 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Gdzies czytalem cytat z Zamojskiego, ale nie pamietam dokladnie slow - moze ktos z was pamieta:
"Dalbym sobie prawa reke uciac, by was widziec katolikami, ale dwie rece oddam, aby nikt was sila do tego nie zmuszal"
Szopen 11:41, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

Nice quote, but doesn't ring a bell.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 19:26, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
Correction:
"Kiedyby to mogło być, abyście wszyscy mogli być papieżnikami, dałbym za to połowę zdrowia mojego, żebym drugą połową żyjąc, cieszył się z tej świętej jedności. Ale jeśli kto będzie wam gwałt czynił, dam wszystko swe zdrowie przy was, abym na tą niewolę nie patrzył" - so the version with the hand was misquotation.
http://www.abcnet.com.pl/pl/artykul.php?art_id=1687&token=
"If I could see you all catholics, I would give a half of my health for that, so I could be happy from this saint unity while living with second part of my health. But if someone would force you, I would give all my health to your case, so not to see such slavery" Szopen 12:42, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

I am removing the fragment about the existence of a group of his followers called "zamojczycy"/"zamoyczyc", as I cannot find any reliable refs confirming the use of that term. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 11:23, 2 July 2012 (UTC)

Passed by milhist reviewer, confirmed by me for WP:POLAND. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 19:47, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Jan Zamoyski/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Seabuckthorn (talk · contribs) 00:05, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
Nominator: Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here
Hi! My review for this article will be here shortly.  --Seabuckthorn ♥ 00:05, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

1: Well-written

a. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors: 
b. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists: 

2: Verifiable with no original research

a. Has an appropriate reference section:  Yes
b. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:  excellent (Thorough check on Google.)

c. No original research:   Done

3: Broad in its coverage

4: Neutral

5: Stable: No edit wars, etc:  Yes
6: Images  Done (PD)

As per the above checklist, there are no issues with the article and it’s a GA. The prose quality in particular has been fantastic in all your articles. I’m inspired a lot by your conscientiousness. Thanks, Piotrus, very much for your diligence in writing such great articles. 
Promoting the article to GA status.  --Seabuckthorn ♥ 22:41, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

is not -ść anything. What was it actually? — LlywelynII 02:57, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

He has Coat of Arms Tube that say he ancestry connected with Roman founded Lithuania-Litva. Александр Макович (talk) 20:29, 19 January 2025 (UTC)