# Talk:Champagne Problems (album)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Champagne Problems (album)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: K. Peake (talk · contribs) 10:55, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

Here comes a review for you in the GAN backlog! --K. Peake 10:55, 13 June 2022 (UTC)


### Infobox and lead
Under the released and length parameters, shouldn't Champagne Problems not be before each part since we already know what these are?
 Done
Why is dance-pop not listed as the genre in the infobox?
 Done
The creation sentence should be the third of the first para instead, as this info should be before the final product's music
I wasn't sure what you were asking here so I did some c/e hoping that helps resolve this issue.
"Champagne Problems was created over" → "The album was created over" and shouldn't you mention this was during late 2021?
 Done
Remove the part about Heartbreaker having used the same format previously because this is the lead, not background
 Done
"from Champagne Problems #DQH1 and Champagne Problems #DQH2" → "from both #DQH1 and #DQH2" since you already wrote Champagne Problems #DQH1 earlier in this para
 Done
Remove wikilink on YouTube
 Done


### Background and creation
Remove the comma before Heartbreaker
 Done
"on which it was issued for" → "which was released as planned for"
I did some c/e.


### Composition and reception
"of 24UR, and is entirely performed in English unlike her" → "of 24UR and is entirely performed in English, unlike Inna's"
 Done
Wikilink refrain
 Done
"Musially, "Champagne Problems" is" → "Musically, "Champagne Problems" is"
 Done
Specify which series of Dance Queen's House the challenge was presented during
 Done
Are you sure the second OCC source can be used to verify it as her first entry since Hot because the history does not include download charts?
I am not sure, but according to Inna discography, it looks like Hot was the first and last entry in a UK album music chart before this recording. This fact would be something Billboard would indicate, but I know that overseas music charts do not go in-depth or provide analysis for feats such as this one. Let me know what you would like me to do about this.
Pipe GfK Entertainment to GfK Entertainment charts
 Done
The source does not call the album the singer's first charting record in Germany
 Done


### Track listing
You should add the respective sources to these parts to verify the track listings
 Done


### Charts
Pipe Official German Charts to GfK Entertainment Charts
 Done


### Release history
Format → Format(s)
 Done


### References
Copyvio score looks incredible at 1.0%!!!!
Why does ref 2 cite Apple Music while refs 12, 13 and 14 cite iTunes Store?
 Done
YouTube should be cited in the via parameter and cite the uploader as publisher instead on refs 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 and 11
 Done
Pipe Official German Charts to GfK Entertainment Charts on ref 20
 Done


### Final comments and verdict
 On hold until all of the issues are fixed; this is a well-written article for sure however! --K. Peake 11:30, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
@Kyle Peake: I wouldn't mind jumping in to help address these issues. Not sure if Darius is dealing with RL issues, but if it's ok with the reviewer, I'll see what I can do. Best – jona ✉ 13:25, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
AJona1992 I am more than happy with that, being that not only has it been more than two weeks but there is not too many issues anyway. --K. Peake 16:29, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
I have addressed the issues as well as did some c/e throughout the article. Best – jona ✉ 14:02, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
AJona1992 Thanks a lot for jumping in, but I would say the genres sentence about the first release should be the last of the first para instead and just remove the first release to chart part altogether, really. --K. Peake 11:25, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
I have addressed the issues. Best – jona ✉ 13:27, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
 Pass now, nice job as a replacement editor! --K. Peake 09:00, 4 July 2022 (UTC)