# Talk:Chloë Sevigny

she isnt catholic read this http://www.chloe-sevigny.org/information/biography/ , i wish to respond me --Muhib mansour (talk) 00:33, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

Muhib mansour: The source you are linking to says, "But, as she told the New York Post in 2003, though she rebelled against the family religion in her youth, Chloë is to this day a practicing Catholic..." - SummerPhD (talk) 05:36, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

Odd that this hasn't been mentioned yet. Five months and counting since the premiere is a long time in showbiz. And on Wiki, the triggerhappiest of all websites, in general... Especially when it's such a big part on such a huge, ongoing show. Will be on most top 10 TV shows at the end of 2015, and Sevigny's performance has been noted by several critics. Come on internet people.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.157.137.230 (talk) 20:54, 28 August 2015 (UTC) 
What?! And now I see it's marked as a 'good article'. That's just weird considering the above omission. I'll try and include it now very briefly, as a start.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.157.137.230 (talk) 21:02, 28 August 2015 (UTC) 

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Chloë Sevigny/CommentsTalk:Chloë Sevigny/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
Last edited at 08:00, 19 March 2010 (UTC).
Substituted at 11:35, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

The article twice references a 1994 portrait of Sevigny in The New Yorker by Jay McInerney, quoting him as saying that she was "the coolest girl in the world". Nowhere in his article does he say this. There are several instances of McInerney and other people quoted in the portrait describing her as "super-cool" or "cool", and McInerney mentions Sonic Youth as "the coolest band in the world" (Sevigny appeared in one of their music videos). But the quote given in the Wikipedia article is nowhere to be found. Seeing as it is used in the leading paragraph and then again further down in the article, this should be corrected.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.214.21.170 (talk) 16:53, 11 December 2017 (UTC) 

Also the New Yorker article references her appearance in the lemonheads video, so it wouldn’t have been “subsequently” 2607:F598:D538:0:84F4:7DF2:EFE1:E25B (talk) 00:58, 22 May 2025 (UTC)