# Talk:Mikoyan-Gurevich DIS

The initial version of this article was based on a material from aviation.ru. It has been released under the GFDL by the copyright holder.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Mikoyan-Gurevich DIS/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: The Bushranger (talk · contribs) 01:28, 1 December 2011 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose):  b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): 
A few grammar smoothings are required - for instance, "with service designation MiG-5 was reserved" is rather awkward. The Russian words defining OKO should be italicised, for two examples. Also, the "design and development" section should be subdivided, I believe - the flight testing should be in a seperate section/subsection.
All done, I believe.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 02:13, 1 December 2011 (UTC)

It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 
References are accurate and reliable, without OR. While technically meeting the requirement I think the long paragraphs shouldn't be cited just at the end - it's an invitation for later additions to "pretend" to be referenced.
My articles may be hijacked later on, but I'll take that risk.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 02:13, 1 December 2011 (UTC)
Fair enough.
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 

It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 

It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 

Overall:
Pass/Fail: 
Placing this on hold while the above comments are addressed. The Bushranger One ping only 01:28, 1 December 2011 (UTC)
Good to go. Nice work. - The Bushranger One ping only 05:21, 1 December 2011 (UTC)