# Talk:Inflow (meteorology)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Inflow (meteorology)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: –– Jezhotwells (talk) 00:40, 6 April 2010 (UTC)

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.


### Checking against GA criteria
GA review (see here for criteria)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose):  b (MoS): 
I made some copy-edits for clarity and style diff.
Although addressed in the latter part of the section Extratropical cyclones, the first paragraph of that section does not address the difference in polarity (N-S) and direction (E-W) between the northern and southern hemispheres.  Done
The article complies sufficiently with the manual of style

It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 
All online cited references are live, all appear reliable, all appear to support the cited statements.
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 
A succinct and concise description of the phenonomen
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 

It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 

Overall:
Pass/Fail: 
Nearly there, just one issue above to be addressed. On Hold for seven days. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 01:30, 6 April 2010 (UTC)

I believe I have now made the changes you requested within the extratropical cyclone section.  Let me know if it needs more clarification.  Thegreatdr (talk) 21:01, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for addressing that. I felt it was important to clarify this s we must remember that Wikipedia should reflect a global view, rather than one confined to just one hemisphere. I am happy to list this as a good article. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 23:07, 6 April 2010 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Inflow (meteorology). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060823090940/http://www.weather.gov/os/brochures/adv_spotters.pdf to http://www.weather.gov/os/brochures/adv_spotters.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 03:15, 25 February 2016 (UTC)