# Talk:HMS Retriever (1917)

This review is transcluded from Talk:HMS Retriever (1917)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 15:11, 22 December 2020 (UTC)

I'll get to this soon. ♦ jaguar 15:11, 22 December 2020 (UTC)

The lead summarises the article in accordance to WP:LEAD
"The ships differed from the six preceding Thornycroft M-class built by the yard" - where was the yard in question? Southampton? Don't worry about specifying if it isn't possible
"along with four 21 in (533 mm)" - inch
"The following year, the ship was credited with the destruction of the submarine SM UB-54" - perhaps de-link submarine here
In light of its length and well-written prose I'll promote this outright. It meets the GA criteria both on prose and comprehensibility, owing to its short service history. I couldn't find any other issues with the article and enjoyed reading it. The above points are very minor nitpicks, but otherwise this is definitely GA standard. Well done - I'll be on the lookout to reviewing more Royal Navy GANs.  ♦ jaguar 14:01, 23 December 2020 (UTC)