# Talk:Dive profile

How long should it take a diver to reach a depth of 155 feet?  Is there an average time to reach this depth or does it depend on the diver?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.242.3.138 (talk) 02:59, 26 June 2008 (UTC) 

I am reverting this good-faith edit, as it contradicts what is true. The preceding sentence is undoubtedly correct, as the body will eventually eliminate excess inert gas. The issue of build-up of asymptomatic bubbles, leading to slower off-gassing on multiple repetitive dives, does exist. However, this edit gives the impression that such bubbles are never eliminated. Some dive tables, such as the SAA Buhlmann system, contain guidance such as "Take one day off diving per week" to allow the body to eliminate asymptomatic bubbles (and to allow for very slow compartments outside of the model). I know of no DCS incidents that have been attributed to bubble build-up when this sort of schedule is followed.
I would suggest that if the issue of asymptomatic bubbles is mentioned in this article, then it needs to be reworded for accuracy and an accessible source cited. Perhaps one of the articles on diving decompression or dive tables would a better place to explain this more fully. --RexxS (talk) 14:43, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
Addition: I've tried to rewrite the section for clarity and to incorporate the issues above. Feel free to improve it. --RexxS (talk) 14:59, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

B-Class-1: It is suitably referenced, and all major points have appropriate inline citations.
B-Class-2: It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies.
B-Class-3: It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content.
B-Class-4: It is free from major grammatical errors.
B-Class-5: It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams.
B-Class-6: It presents content in an accessible way.
Articles passes on all criteria. --RexxS (talk) 00:33, 25 September 2009 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Dive profile/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Jclemens (talk · contribs) 04:56, 25 August 2016 (UTC)


### First read-through
Other than the lead and citation needed tags, this meets criteria.  It's certainly possible to spice up the prose and images, but the bulk of the GA criteria are met.  It's going to be ON HOLD until those are addressed. Jclemens (talk) 05:17, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
Jclemens, Thanks for reviewing, I will try to sort out the point above within the next few days. I do not foresee any problems. • • • Peter (Southwood) (talk): 12:44, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for your prompt attention to the feedback. It now meets GA criteria. Cheers, Jclemens (talk) 17:50, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
Jclemens, Thank you for your efficient review, a pleasure to work with you. Cheers, • • • Peter (Southwood) (talk): 05:40, 26 August 2016 (UTC)

If anyone has a suitable image of a paper logbook page with a standardised dive profile graphic as used for recreational dive planning, please upload to Commons with appropriate license, and link in the Records section. It does not really matter whether the page is filled in, but if it is, it should be filled in correctly. Thanks, • • • Peter (Southwood) (talk): 06:19, 26 August 2016 (UTC)