# Talk:Cargolink

This review is transcluded from Talk:Cargolink/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.


### Conducting review
I will undertake the review here. The article appears neutral, stable, and appropriately referenced. The image appears to be in order. The text appears to cover main issues, principally the scope of the fleet and the history of the comapny's estbalishment, which in this case is particularly notable. The references appear sound, and are accepted in good faith as i don't read Norwegian.
I have undertaken some minor copyediting tasks. These aside, I do not think the article requires revision to be assessed as GA. hamiltonstone (talk) 06:28, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

I took a look at the references and they generally support the facts they are attached to, but there are some problems. Reference 2 does not mention anything about Dispolok, nor who owns the shunters. Number 8, 9, 10 and 14 does not exist. Reference 19 states that Cargolink was founded in 2007, not 2008. I think 2008 is correct, though. Reference 20 states that Cargolink's license was issued on 17 September, not 18 September. Not really a problem, but reference 11 and 12 mention the same facts and are therefore interchangeable. There is also a question of how many locomotives Cargolink has. Some sources say 10 diesel locomotives, other mention only 3. It is possible that only three have been put into service so far. The article does not mention the electric locomotives Cargolink uses in some trains, nor do any of the sources. In general, I am also sceptical about using newspapers as references, but I won't make a fuss about it if Wikipedia accepts them. Ters (talk) 08:05, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 6 external links on Cargolink. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://archive.is/20130112054440/http://dt.no/article/20081025/NYHET/775212101/1234 to http://dt.no/article/20081025/NYHET/775212101/1234
Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/64jwK1U08?url=http://dt.no/nyheter/premiere-for-cargolink-1.3358072 to http://dt.no/article/20081217/NYHET/48239890
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://dt.no/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=%2F20081212%2FNYHET%2F929615791
Added archive https://archive.is/20110724182142/http://www.ofotenstidende.no/nyhet.asp?id=297&fs=1 to http://www.ofotenstidende.no/nyhet.asp?id=297&fs=1
Added archive https://archive.is/20110724182149/http://www.ofotenstidende.no/nyhet.asp?id=4046&fs=8 to http://www.ofotenstidende.no/nyhet.asp?id=4046&fs=8
Added archive https://archive.is/20120707220235/http://dt.no/article/20080722/NYHET/201569392 to http://dt.no/article/20080722/NYHET/201569392
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.ofotenstidende.no/nyhet.asp?id=4200
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.jernbanetilsynet.no/Jernbanevirksomheter/?object=270
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:43, 30 July 2017 (UTC)