# Talk:Laguna Miscanti

This review is transcluded from Talk:Miscanti Lake/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: GhostRiver (talk · contribs) 05:00, 26 October 2021 (UTC)

I'll look at this tomorrow when I am more awake! — GhostRiver 05:00, 26 October 2021 (UTC)


### Infobox and lede
No comma after "of the Antofagasta Region"
Removed. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 10:53, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
"Miñiques volcano" → "The Miñiques volcano"
I don't think that a "the" is strictly necessary. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 10:53, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
To be pedantic, the "Antofagasta Region" is not mentioned in the body and is not cited
Now it is with citation. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 10:53, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
Diacritic needed in "Laguna Miñiques"
Done? Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 10:53, 1 November 2021 (UTC)


### Geography
Laguna Miñiques should be linked upon its first mention (5,000 tourists) and delinked in the following clause
It already is in the lead? Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 10:53, 1 November 2021 (UTC)


### Hydrography and geology
"It is a maximally" → "Laguna Miscanti is a maximally"
Done. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 10:53, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
Diacritic needed for Cerro Miñiques
Done. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 10:53, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
Delink Laguna Miñiques in this section


### Hydrology
"ranging from the Miocene to Holocene age"
Not sure that this is correct - Miocene is often a modifier to "age" rather than a proper noun. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 19:22, 27 October 2021 (UTC)


### Climate
"a little warmer" – can we be more precise?
No, sorry. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 19:22, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Delink Holocene, linked above
Hyphen to em dash in "late Pleistocene-early Holocene wet period"
Done. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 10:53, 1 November 2021 (UTC)


### Biology
Comma after "Widgeonweed grows at the lakeshores"


### References
The first two sources are inconsistent with the citation style used in all future refs
All online sources should have access dates, including the journal articles being linked
I don't think that journal sources get access dates even when linked. I think I got the reports, however. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 19:22, 27 October 2021 (UTC)


### General comments
Image and map are properly licesned and relevant
No stability concerns in the revision history
Earwig score looks good
@GhostRiver: Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 19:22, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Jo-Jo Eumerus I have left additional comments on the sections I did not get to earlier. — GhostRiver 01:33, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
@GhostRiver: I think all is done. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 10:53, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
I have made a few additional changes myself; things linked in the lede still need to be linked upon their first mention in the body. In any case, I am passing this article. — GhostRiver 16:40, 1 November 2021 (UTC)