# Talk:Helen Mayo

The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Edofedinburgh 03:12, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Helen Mayo/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Hawkeye7 (talk) 11:30, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality: 

B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists: 

Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources: 

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary: 

C. No original research: 

Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects: 

B. Focused: 

Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias: 

Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc: 

Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales: 

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions: 

Overall:
Pass or Fail: 

Comment I have given the article a copy edit. Note that ALT text should not merely repeat the caption. See WP:ALT. Hawkeye7 (talk) 20:53, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

Fact: Most to all of the facts listed are referenced with an appropriate reference.   
Relevancy: Everything listed is relevant to the article. Definitely needs more coverage on the family side of Helen. 
The article seems to appear very neutral and gives information based on both sides of the equilibrium. 
The citation of Mothercraft could be a little biased towards females. 
Her hometown described her as a "doyen" of medical women once she passed. 
Missing information: THere is a lot of missing information that could be added such as her early childhood and also her relationship with her parents growing up and if she was passed along into the medical field or just decided to choose that route. ChristianSmay (talk) 00:14, 14 March 2020 (UTC)