# Talk:Forest Hills–71st Avenue station

What on earth is a "Station Repoerter?" —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.46.73.229 (talk • contribs) 10:39, 12 November 2006

A typo, is what. Fixed. —Larry V (talk | contribs) 04:17, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

East of the station the tunnel widens to 6 tracks, with 2 tracks starting between the local and express tracks in each direction. The 2 tracks ramps down to a lower level, where it widens to 4 tracks, and run on a lower level through the 75th Avenue station. These tracks are access to the Jamaica Yard and train storage.
This section already exists at the beginning of the second paragraph almost word-for-word. Please stop adding it to the end of the article. Acps110 (talk) 01:41, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

{{editsemiprotected}}

Mr etre (talk) 00:24, 10 July 2010 (UTC)

 Not done: please be more specific about what needs to be changed. Acps110 (talk • contribs) 01:01, 10 July 2010 (UTC)

{{editsemiprotected}}

207.237.8.187 (talk) 00:25, 10 July 2010 (UTC)

 Not done: please be more specific about what needs to be changed. Acps110 (talk • contribs) 01:02, 10 July 2010 (UTC)

I think we should replace the picture as it still shows the V train in it.--iGeMiNix 01:28, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

According to online research, noting citeable yet though. This station was going to be the Queens end of the 1960's Super-Express line that would have run from the 63rd Street Line. If anyone sees this and has sound information on what was going to happen here can you contact me, I'm considering writing an article on the proposal.Graham1973 (talk) 03:40, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Forest Hills–71st Avenue (IND Queens Boulevard Line). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150113015344/http://www.stationreporter.net/etrain.htm to http://www.stationreporter.net/etrain.htm
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150113015227/http://www.stationreporter.net/ftrain.htm to http://www.stationreporter.net/ftrain.htm
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080608075315/http://www.stationreporter.net/rtrain.htm to http://www.stationreporter.net/rtrain.htm
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100922060746/http://www.stationreporter.net/mxtrain.htm to http://www.stationreporter.net/mxtrain.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:32, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:163rd Street–Amsterdam Avenue (IND Eighth Avenue Line) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RMCD bot 17:31, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Forest Hills–71st Avenue (IND Queens Boulevard Line). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140209040131/http://www.dnainfo.com/new-york/20131231/forest-hills/forest-hills-subway-station-project-delayed-by-three-months to http://www.dnainfo.com/new-york/20131231/forest-hills/forest-hills-subway-station-project-delayed-by-three-months
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140327022909/http://www.dnainfo.com/new-york/20140325/forest-hills/forest-hills-subway-station-renovation-be-completed-march-mta-says to http://www.dnainfo.com/new-york/20140325/forest-hills/forest-hills-subway-station-renovation-be-completed-march-mta-says
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:07, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Forest Hills–71st Avenue (IND Queens Boulevard Line)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: RickyCourtney (talk · contribs) 00:29, 18 December 2017 (UTC)


### Criteria
### Review
Well-written:

Verifiable with no original research:

Broad in its coverage:

Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.

Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.

Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:


#### Result
#### Discussion
Please add any related discussion here.

Thank you for taking this article up for review.--Kew Gardens 613 (talk) 00:50, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
Reviewer response:
With those changes made, the article passes. Congratulations to all editors involved.
--RickyCourtney (talk) 06:18, 20 December 2017 (UTC)


### Additional notes