# Talk:Emotional Consequences of Broadcast Television

Some thoughts on this, OlifanofmrTennant:

IMDb is not a good metric, even if repeated in other sources, as it's user-generated and subject to all sorts of issues like selection bias and vote stacking.
Without repeating other articles too much, I think there is some place in "Production" for an explanation of "six seasons and a movie" and that this did become the final episode after Yahoo! Screen collapsed. This might be some use.
Some book sources that look useful: [1][2]. I would like to use TV (The Book) but Google Books won't show me a preview: [3]
Other sources—I've not fully evaluated whether each is reliable and useful yet: ProQuest 1750643264 (Den of Geek listicle), Daily Beast, Daily Dot, /Film, Observer, Collider, Alan Sepinwall in Uproxx, Press Enterprise, TVLine, ScreenCrush, CinemaBlend, TVOvermind, HappyMag
Chang's fart joke is explained here.
Per WP:VGRS, CBR is a "situational" source, so we need to think about whether this is an appropriate use.
Let me know any thoughts you have. I can try to incorporate some of these sources within the next few weeks, but if you can do it sooner then go for it. — Bilorv (talk) 17:26, 3 March 2024 (UTC)

So included on the season six DVD it includes an extra titled "Six seasons and a finale" which includes some production details. Could it be cited or would it be considered Original research the same way citing an episode would be?  Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 20:14, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
Yes, you can definitely cite DVD extras like that. — Bilorv (talk) 20:21, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
I'll add that it's fine to use that as a source, but be careful not to overload the article with that information – see WP:PRIMARY. RunningTiger123 (talk) 04:18, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
@OlifanofmrTennant: other than some of the additional sources above I think we've resolved all those points. I want to add any more sources I can find and reformulate the "Reception" section by theme rather than by critic. I've put a lot of the content in an "Analysis" section—do you think it makes sense at the moment? Does any of the content need to be reordered or move back to "Production"?Also, I like the fact about the opening shots from the DVD commentary. I know some of them aren't filled with much information but are there any other facts that could be relevant? (We shot this scene on location—okay, he's right. It won't work.) — Bilorv (talk) 17:28, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
They might but I dont have access to the season 6 commentary's as they aren't included on the complete series box set.  Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 05:07, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
@Bilorv: Would you be intrested in nominating this for GA?. I'ts fine if your not. I'm going to make a few edits. But please let me know either way. Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 19:38, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
@OlifanofmrTennant: I've not forgotten this article but I have been very busy. I can't commit to doing this immediately but in the next month I could carry out some more edits and then we could co-nominate it for GA. If you would prefer not to wait and nominate it yourself then go ahead—I don't mind either way. — Bilorv (talk) 21:22, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
@Bilorv: I'll wait for you. Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 22:16, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
@OlifanofmrTennant: I'm very sorry I wasn't able to get this done but I was snowed under by some unexpected commitments. I hope you can still move forwards with it and get the green plus of approval. — Bilorv (talk) 18:09, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
alright Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 23:14, 30 June 2024 (UTC)