# Talk:London Philharmonic Orchestra

The symphonic Zeppelin is performed by the LSO - London Symphony Orchestra, not the LPO.

What's your source on that? Amazon says otherwise and so does my copy of the album. --Sithy 12:34, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
Shouldn't there be something on their appearance in Metalocalypse? Possibly under non-classical work.[Metalocalypse Episode: Fat Kid at the DethHarmonic.] --Burn8tor16 12:51, June 29 2007
Sorry about the previous post. I found out that it was Emilie Autumn playing as the London Philharmonc instead of the actual orchestra playing. Burn8tor16 19:25, June 29 07 (UTC)

Why on earth does Wikipedia redirect here when you search for the London Session Orchestra? Ender666999 21:28, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

Finally fixed.Worstbull (talk) 05:21, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
Yes, why? Please correct me if I am wrong, but the London Session Orchestra was an orchestra made up of the best performers and sightreaders of London's main orchestras to record music for media. If someone can provide further info please do. --Karljoos (talk) 12:40, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
The LPO and London Session Orchestra are not linked in any way.  This incorrect redirect was drawn to my attention recently and I have made 3 edits (see edit history) to remove references to the London Session Orchestra on this page, and to delete projects that were Session Orchestra rather than LPO.  Do please flag up if you feel that I've removed anything that should still be on the page and I can recheck the LPO's diary archive.
COI Declaration - I'm an employee of the LPO.  
Phil 000 (talk) 14:20, 27 November 2009 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:London Philharmonic Orchestra/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: 3family6 (talk · contribs) 20:32, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar):  b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): 

It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 

It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 

It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 

It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 

Overall: A very well-done article, I only have question about a single image caption.
Y Resolved.--¿3family6 contribs 16:31, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Pass/Fail: 


### Comments
This article is excellent, I think that the peer review back in September ironed out any wrinkles. Prose is solid, scope is well balanced, content is presented neutrally, referencing is excellent, images have suitable licensing. My only problem with this article is that the programme of the first LPO concert is an artistic rendering, not an actual photo. I have no problem with this, but I think the caption should specify that it is a reproduction.--¿3family6 contribs 00:49, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

Fair point. How do you feel about the addition I've just made? Please feel free to adjust if you like. Tim riley talk  11:26, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Looks good. Approved!--¿3family6 contribs 16:31, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Thank you for the review, and the kind remarks you make, above. Tim riley talk  19:15, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on London Philharmonic Orchestra. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120425163342/http://www.richardwitts.com/pdf/Boult__Russell.pdf to http://www.richardwitts.com/pdf/Boult__Russell.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:58, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on London Philharmonic Orchestra. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051210164258/http://www.lpc.org.uk/index.html to http://www.lpc.org.uk/index.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:43, 6 December 2017 (UTC)