# Talk:French battleship République

Hold on, an article about a French battleship that served from 1906 to 1921 with no mention of World War I, not even an explanation as to why she didn't participate (assuming that's why no mention of it)?  This is very hard to accept.
--Piledhigheranddeeper (talk) 18:59, 4 May 2010 (UTC)

What isn't in the sources isn't there. Apparently these two ships spent most of their time in port. - The Bushranger Return fireFlank speed 14:47, 29 May 2010 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:French battleship République/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Rp0211 (talk · contribs) 20:22, 15 July 2012 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose):  b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): 
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 
Overall:
Pass/Fail: 


### Infobox
No issues


### Lead
No issues


### Design
No issues


### Service history
No issues


### Footnotes
No issues


### References
No issues

After thoroughly reviewing this article, I have concluded that this article meets the good article criteria at this time. Congratulations and keep up the good work! Rp0211 (talk2me) 20:42, 15 July 2012 (UTC)