# Talk:General Electric Building

This page needs help with vocabulary. What does "generous masonry" actually mean? --Cantara 05:43, 9 December 2005 (UTC)

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 03:22, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

I found a pair of images of the GE building that I didn't recognize as such, until some research.

Oh, if I only didn't lose the ability to transfer images to the commons. ---------User:DanTD (talk)  13:09, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on General Electric Building. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050824214235/http://www.emporis.com/en/il/pc/?id=115512&aid=8 to http://www.emporis.com/en/il/pc/?id=115512&aid=8
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:43, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

@Beyond My Ken: could you explain your concern? You've reverted twice now without comment. Nikkimaria (talk) 13:37, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

A standard place listing would be Address, City, State, United States.  I've always felt that "United States" (or whatever country) was completely unnecessary when "world cities" such as New York, London, Paris, Berlin were involved, since these places are sui generis, so that leaves Address, City, State.  A parallel arguement holds for "New York, City, New York", so that brings us to "Address, New York City".  New York City is almost unique in the U.S. in that it is not contained within a county, or one county and parts of other, or is a city/county; instead, New York contains within itself 5 counties, most of which are as well known as the city itself, at least by their Borough name.  So that brings us to Address, Borough, New York City.  This is the ideal place identifier for places within New York City, the state and country being redundant. That's what's in the article, and that's what should stay there. Beyond My Ken (talk) 20:54, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
Incidentally, that format -- Address, Borough, New York City -- is standard for buildings in NYC throughout Wikipedia. Beyond My Ken (talk) 21:11, 18 November 2020 (UTC)