# Talk:Meowscles

This review is transcluded from Talk:Meowscles/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: Kung Fu Man (talk · contribs) 21:36, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
Reviewer: Guyinblack25 (talk · contribs) 06:31, 22 November 2025 (UTC)

Currently reviewing the article. I will post comments soon. (Guyinblack25 talk 06:31, 22 November 2025 (UTC))


### Review comments
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

The article is in good shape. I did some minor copy editing for grammar and flow. Here's what's left to do.
Is it well written?
A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct: 
The prose was in good shape. I made copy edits to remove some ambiguity and remove misplaced commas. Regarding commas in the middle of sentences: if the second part of a sentence can stand alone as a complete and grammatically correct sentence (i.e., independent clause), then a comma is required. If the second part requires some words being added to make it a complete sentence (i.e., dependent clause), then a comma should be omitted.
B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation: 

Is it verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check?
A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline: 

B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose): 

C. It contains no original research: 

D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism: 

Is it broad in its coverage?
A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic: 

B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style): 

Is it neutral?
It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each: 

Is it stable?
It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute: 

Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content: 

B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions: 
A more informative caption would be best. Does the pose have significance to the game? Is it maybe a victory move or something the player can do? I also added alt text to the image.
Overall:
Pass or Fail: 
@Kung Fu Man: Work on the image caption some and the article should be good to pass. (Guyinblack25 talk 21:09, 22 November 2025 (UTC))
@Guyinblack25: Added a stronger caption, didn't want to go too hard with the description due to it being promotional art, does that suffice?--Kung Fu Man (talk) 22:46, 22 November 2025 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

final review
Is it well written?
A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct: 

B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation: 

Is it verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check?
A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline: 

B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose): 

C. It contains no original research: 

D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism: 

Is it broad in its coverage?
A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic: 

B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style): 

Is it neutral?
It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each: 

Is it stable?
It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute: 

Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content: 

B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions: 
Updated caption looks good
Overall:
Pass or Fail: 
Issue addressed. Passing article. Great job. (Guyinblack25 talk 05:10, 23 November 2025 (UTC))