# Talk:Don't Be

@TeenAngels1234: I'll be leaving some notes throughout my copy edit.

The lead should adequately summarize the article content per MOS:INTRO. In particular, review MOS:LEADREL.
I have left some maintenance tags throughout.
Is Kirkegaard's opinion being given too much weight?
While not required for GA, the citation style is inconsistent, and I would recommend creating different citations for each chapter in a book collection, not just the collection as a whole. It's confusing when the short cite has a different name to the author and then points to a book in the references section without even mentioning the chapter author.
The themes, reception, and development section might need some reorganization. It's unclear why some of the material is in the development section rather than themes/analysis.
Paraphrase more of the quotes in the reception section.
voorts (talk/contributions) 00:52, 8 March 2025 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Don't Be/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: TeenAngels1234 (talk · contribs) 15:39, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
Reviewer: Z. Patterson (talk · contribs) 23:58, 28 April 2025 (UTC)
The article looks well-written, well-researched, and stable.  There also appears to be no copyright violations.  However, to get this to a WP:GA, I have some points to address.

The article's source says to use DMY dates, but I see dates in MDY format in the prose.  Either change the prose dates to DMY format, or change all dates to MDY format.
Remove contractions from the article are not in the title of the episode or in references.  That is, in unquoted prose.
Per WP:VALNET, Comic Book Resources sources after 2016 are not reliable.  I recommend changing them to something more reliable (even something such as Valnet's other sites such as Screen Rant) or removing them if you cannot find a reliable replacement.
The line "using his basic, knowledge of the language" does not need a comma in that phrase.
LaserDisc is a trademarked name, so it should be capitalized as shown here.  You do not need to italicize LaserDisc, as I italicized it here simply to emphasize it.
Citations should be put in numerical order.
What variant of English is this article trying to use?  I see "criticised" in the Reception section, but "behavior" in the Cultural references section.  The article looks like it uses American English most of the time, but "criticised" is British English.  Have you considered changing the language variety to either American English or British English with Oxford spelling?  If you choose Oxford spelling, it uses -ize spellings instead of -ise spellings.
If you make these changes, I plan to pass this as a good article.  I commend your work. Z. Patterson (talk) 23:58, 28 April 2025 (UTC)

@TeenAngels1234: I placed the review on hold.  I also noticed that the article does not have a short description.  Per WP:SDESC, every article that does not have a self-explanatory title should have a short description. Z. Patterson (talk) 09:11, 4 May 2025 (UTC)
@Z. Patterson: So sorry for this delay. I was extremely busy in RL for Wikipedia. I'm gonna fix the problems as soon as possible.--TeenAngels1234 (talk) 18:21, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
@TeenAngels1234: I see that you made some changes.  I was bold and made the remaining changes myself, per the WP:GAN/I#R3.  I am passing this as a good article, but I think we could change out other Valnet sources such as Game Rant and Screen Rant to improve this article to FA quality, if you choose to bring it to this level.  Good work.  Z. Patterson (talk) 22:41, 11 May 2025 (UTC)