# Talk:Japanese cruiser Izumo

This review is transcluded from Talk:Japanese cruiser Izumo/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Parsecboy (talk · contribs) 17:39, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose):  b (MoS): 
See defence and defense.
Link Knyaz Suvorov
...closer to the Russian border - closer than what?
Dunno. The first landing was somewhere NE of Wonsan, but I can't find the name anywhere so it's probably some dinky fishing village or something, rendered in British English through Japanese from the original Korean.
Might be worth a post at WP:KOREA - I've had some good luck finding place names in China and New Guinea from their old German names.
Baja California shouldn't be italicized
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 

It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 

It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 

It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 
File:Japanese cruiser Izumo in Kobe.jpg - needs a source
Overall:
Pass/Fail: 

Couldn't find the photo on Google image, so I deleted it as there's no clear evidence of publishing before '56. I've dealt with everything else, I think, so see if they suit. I hope that this is starting a trend for you to review more! Many thanks for knocking off my three.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 17:59, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Mostly I think it's a trend of being more active in general lately - you might have noticed I've started chopping through the American BBs over the past week or so. Shame about the photo, since you don't generally get one showing the shipbreaking process. Parsecboy (talk) 19:06, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Japanese cruiser Izumo. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.nwc.navy.mil/press/Review/2000/winter/art3-w00.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
N An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere.  Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked= to true

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 14:55, 31 March 2016 (UTC)