# Talk:Into the Crevasse

This review is transcluded from Talk:Into the Crevasse/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Matthew R Dunn (talk) 17:36, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality: 

B. MoS compliance: 

Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources: 
Sources aplenty!
B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary: 
Most sources check out fine, but ref numbers 5 through 8 are from the Internet Movie Database, which is a user-generated website; I'm a bit uncomforable with this, considering that the IMDb isn't considered reliable from my expierience, any reason why they should be accepted?
IMDb cannot be used as a source to back up any potentially contentious material about living persons (BLPs), the trivia and goofs sections that are based on user submissions, etc., but I removed them. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 18:11, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
C. No original research: 

Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects: 

B. Focused: 

Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias: 

Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc: 

Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales: 
Only one copyrighted image; has the apporpriate tags.
B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions: 

Overall:
Pass or Fail: 
So far, nice work. Just need one thing sorted out really, then hopefully, I'll pass it. -- Matthew R Dunn (talk) 17:36, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
OK, now that the issue has been addressed, I can now pass the article. Good job! -- Matthew R Dunn (talk) 19:25, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for reviewing the article. :) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 19:29, 20 August 2010 (UTC)

What? Some nobody from a magazine I've never heard of didn't like the episode? Wow, thanks for including that kind of gem in every single episode article. Honestly, what is the point of the reception sections? Comedy is a completely subjective enterprise and there is no value in having the ruminations of idiots that weren't competent enough to write movie reviews and so, somehow, decided that, "hey, I watch TV all the time anyway, why not try to eke out some form of existence by writing inane reviews of TV shows?" or some crap like that. And thank God they did, really. There's always something perverse about criticism in general; trying to objectively rate that which is utterly subjective by nature. At least most notable film critics actually study films. What the hell to TV critics do other than appoint themselves as the arbiters of television quality? Paste Magazine? Really? Gee, thanks for that. Time Out Chicago? What? It wasn't "super hilarious"? Brilliant analysis. The moron at the A. V. Club (whatever the hell that is) though the storylines were tired. Well, damn! He/she/it has got me there, because I can remember back in Season One when Tracy was producing a porn based on Liz's life and back into Season Two when Jenna was shooting a werewolf movie in Iceland. This same sort of crap is marring every episode page; there is no need for a reception section. In closing, opinions are like a-holes: everybody's got one. They just don't all matter (I appreciate the irony of this statement).--172.190.4.163 (talk) 08:06, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 6 external links on Into the Crevasse. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110227174908/http://tv.yahoo.com/30-rock/show/kidney-now/episode/207230/recap to https://tv.yahoo.com/30-rock/show/kidney-now/episode/207230/recap
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110615103626/http://tv.yahoo.com/30-rock/show/season-4/episode/219845/recap to https://tv.yahoo.com/30-rock/show/season-4/episode/219845/recap
Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/5vTaPC446?url=http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/10/23/tv-ratings-thursday-abc-wins-community-flashforward-leno-down-survivor-greys-up/31278 to http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/10/23/tv-ratings-thursday-abc-wins-community-flashforward-leno-down-survivor-greys-up/31278
Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/5vTaK4faQ?url=http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2009/10/16/tv-ratings-thursday-30-rock-premieres-down-sharply-vampire-diaries-hits-highs/30547 to http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/10/16/tv-ratings-thursday-30-rock-premieres-down-sharply-vampire-diaries-hits-highs/30547
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100213032226/http://www.tvguide.com/Episode-Recaps/30-rock/30-Rock-Episode-1011197.aspx to http://www.tvguide.com/episode-recaps/30-rock/30-rock-episode-1011197.aspx
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091026150021/http://www3.timeoutny.com/chicago/blog/out-and-about/2009/10/30-rock-recap-season-4-%E2%80%9Cinto-the-crevasse%E2%80%9D/ to http://www3.timeoutny.com/chicago/blog/out-and-about/2009/10/30-rock-recap-season-4-%E2%80%9Cinto-the-crevasse%E2%80%9D/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:25, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Into the Crevasse. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110615064957/http://tv.yahoo.com/30-rock/show/into-the-crevasse/episode/220512/recap to https://tv.yahoo.com/30-rock/show/into-the-crevasse/episode/220512/recap
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100710053332/http://blog.zap2it.com/frominsidethebox/2010/07/emmy-nominations-the-complete-list.html to http://blog.zap2it.com/frominsidethebox/2010/07/emmy-nominations-the-complete-list.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:00, 15 November 2017 (UTC)