# Talk:Italian cruiser Liguria

This review is transcluded from Talk:Italian cruiser Liguria/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Jonas Vinther (talk · contribs) 19:30, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
Oh God! Another ship article? I'll get right to it. :) Jonas Vinther (speak to me!) 19:30, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

Don't look now, but just a bit more work is needed on these two before they're up as well. Parsecboy (talk) 20:00, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
Well-written 
a. the prose is clear and concise, it respects copyright laws, and the spelling and grammar are correct
b. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation

The article is wonderfully written with no sentence or grammar errors.
Verifiable with no original research 
a. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline
b. It provides in-line citations from reliable sources for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines
c. It contains no original research

The article uses book and journal sources all of which contain the necessary information.
Broad in its coverage 
a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic
b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail

The article is broad in its coverage, stays on topic and does not go into unnecessary detail.
Neutral 
It represents viewpoints fairly and without bias, giving due weight to each

The article is neutral with no personal statements or opinions.
Stable 
It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute

The article is perfectly stable with no edit wars or content disputes.
Illustrated 
a. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content
b. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions

The article is illustrated with two images which are both public domains.
Pass, fail or hold? 
With the article meeting the GA-criteria I'm going to pass it. Good job. :) Jonas Vinther (speak to me!) 20:02, 8 October 2014 (UTC)