# Talk:Eastern Parkway

@Epicgenius I'm not going to have the time to do a full GA review, but I do want to comment on your use of images vis-a-vis MOS:IMAGERELEVANCE.  Many of the images don't seem to tie into the adjacent text in any way.  For example, File:Crown Heights, Brooklyn, NY, USA - panoramio.jpg is in a section about the 1950s to 1970s, but it's unclear how that image supports that section.  Likewise with File:Eastern Pkwy Utica Av td (2021-12-11) 03.jpg.  If anything, perhaps it belongs with the Transportation section, although it's such a technically poor image, I'm not sure what value it adds at all.  You've got a couple of cycling-related images, which don't seem to be related to the text.  Perhaps under Transportation you could add a sub-section for bikes and talk about the Brooklyn-Queens Greenway (see https://www.nyc.gov/assets/planning/download/pdf/plans/transportation/epx_part2.pdf). RoySmith (talk) 01:03, 8 December 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for the feedback, @RoySmith. I included these images because otherwise, we'd have huge swaths of text without images, but I'll see what I can do about rearranging them. – Epicgenius (talk) 01:10, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
I have moved around some of the images now. They should all tie into the adjacent text; I didn't remove any of the images because, as it turns out, they did not need to be removed at all. – Epicgenius (talk) 01:16, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
Yeah, thats kind of what I figured, but that's what "Images must be significant and relevant in the topic's context, not primarily decorative" is talking about :-)  Given how many members of Wikimedia New York City live in the area, I suspect getting better (and more targeted) images would not be a big deal. RoySmith (talk) 01:16, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
Yeah, that's true. Maybe we can reach out to some of our Brooklyn-based editors for better images. Many of the pictures currently on the article aren't very good; I only added them because they were the only options readily available. – Epicgenius (talk) 01:17, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
I suggested at the recent Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC/Wikipedia Day 2025 planning meeting that we do an introduction to Wiki Shoot Me and show people how to upload images.  This was met with a generally positive reception from the other people on the committee.  Since we're going to be right there, maybe we could even turn this into a photo shoot if the weather is nice.  I'm thinking 12:00 WSM demo.  1:00 photo walk.  3:00 image upload fest.  4:00 showing people the images they just took already in place in this article.  Instant gratification. RoySmith (talk) 01:25, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
That sounds like a good plan. Incidentally, I didn't realize Wikipedia Day 2025 was going to take place at the Brooklyn Central Library - what an interesting coincidence. I'll sign up for that now. – Epicgenius (talk) 01:27, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
Actually, I just noticed that the Brooklyn-Queens Greenway is discussed in the "Design" section. I don't know if this should be moved down to the transportation section, since the relevant paragraph talks about the design of the bike lane as well. – Epicgenius (talk) 01:19, 8 December 2024 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Eastern Parkway/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: Epicgenius (talk · contribs) 21:16, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: Hurricanehink (talk · contribs) 23:13, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

As a roadgeek, and someone who drove this road several times, I'm happy to review this! 

"The neighborhoods around the parkway developed into a "Doctor's Row" in the late 19th century," - I guess I'm curious why you used "a Doctor's Row" and not just "Doctor's Row"?
Good point. I removed the indefinite article and the quotation marks. Epicgenius (talk) 00:28, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
"East of Ralph Avenue, the parkway is reduced to six lanes, heading in a northeasterly direction toward Bushwick Avenue. Here, Eastern Parkway officially becomes the Eastern Parkway Extension[6] and curves northeast" - seems redundant to mention the direction twice
Fixed. Epicgenius (talk) 00:28, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
"East of Ralph Avenue, the street numbers on Eastern Parkway continue down Pitkin Avenue toward Aqueduct Racetrack." - do you mean addresses, or is it like 20th, 19th, 18th, etc.?
I meant to say addresses (this part of Brooklyn has no numbered streets, but the Ralph Avenue intersection gets really close to one of the streets in the East 100s). Epicgenius (talk) 00:28, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
" In an effort to reduce injuries, the city proposed installing traffic signals on all of the service roads during the 2010s." - I take it this hasn't happened yet?
It has not. Most intersections have traffic signals on at least one of the service roads, but not all intersections have traffic lights for both service roads. Epicgenius (talk) 00:28, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
"Approximately 17,000 years ago the moraine of the receding Wisconsin Glacier that formed Long Island established a string of hills." - could you rewrite this a bit with a comma or something? The sentence structure is a bit complex.
I've added a few commas. Epicgenius (talk) 00:28, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
"Until the 1860s, the road was known as Sackett Street." - do you know when Sackett Street was built? I was under the impression that the parkway was brand new
According to Elizabeth Macdonald's doctoral thesis on Brooklyn's parkways, Eastern Parkway was brand-new. However, it ran along the route of Sackett Street, which had been drawn out on city maps without having been built. When Eastern Parkway was announced, the street still hadn't been built, but the right-of-way was widened. I've added that bit to the article. Epicgenius (talk) 00:28, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
Awesome, I had a feeling it might've been something like this. Appreciate the addition. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk)  17:04, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
"The intersection with Bedford Avenue was repaved in brick,[100][101] and the curbs at that intersection were lowered to allow cyclists to safely cross the street." - I love this bit as a biker! Do you know when this happened? Was that the 1898 completion mentioned later? If so, no need to worry about changing anything.
Yes, this was part of the late-1890s modifications to the parkway. Epicgenius (talk) 00:28, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
"The water main's installation was temporarily delayed when the New York City Department of Parks and Recreation (NYC Parks) refused to allow Cashman to excavate the parkway." - was this resolved? What did they do instead?
I am looking into this and will comment further if I find anything within two days. However, from what I understand, the delay was relatively minor and the water main was eventually built. Epicgenius (talk) 19:39, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
"Further complications arose after city officials found that the mobster John A. Gotti was involved with the parkway's renovation." - OK holy cow, there's your hook that you gotta add to the lead! I'm guessing this article is headed for FAC down the line. Ping me when you do by the way, this is a great read so far.
"After the Tully Construction Company resumed construction in 1993, the cost of the renovation increased to $62.4 million." - hate to ask (in case there's any deeper shadier connections) but who covered the increased costs? The city? Anyone else?
It would have been the city government that covered the increased cost, but the article also notes that this was an estimate, not the final cost paid by the city. Epicgenius (talk) 19:39, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
I suggest linking "wayfinding"
Done. Epicgenius (talk) 19:39, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
"The streets directly to the south and north of the parkway (respectively, Union and Degraw streets) were narrowed to 35 feet." - not sure if you forgot to convert, or didn't because you already converted it earlier?
I did exclude this from conversion because this figure was already converted earlier, but I've added a convert template now. Epicgenius (talk) 19:39, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
This article seems very well-researched, so I don't think you'll have any issues addressing any of these comments. Great job on this. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk)  23:13, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for the review, Hurricanehink. I'll address these comments over the weekend. Epicgenius (talk) 00:28, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
Appreciate it! ♫ Hurricanehink (talk)  17:04, 11 January 2025 (UTC)