# Talk:Kidnap (2017 film)

I haven't seen the movie, so I can't really do this myself, but the writing is very hard to understand (and contains numerous errors). Samer (talk) 04:06, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

Shouldn't the heavy similarities between The Call (2013 film) and this film be referenced somewhere, except for a mention in the 'See also' section? Are they connected in any way (It would surprise me if they weren't)? It seems almost comical seeing both posters side by side. -Throast (talk) 23:29, 7 August 2017 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Kidnap (2017 film)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Tayi Arajakate (talk · contribs) 01:08, 25 July 2021 (UTC)

Hello Some Dude From North Carolina, I will take up the review for this nomination and present it to you in some time. Tayi Arajakate Talk 01:08, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
Some Dude From North Carolina, I've completed the review. The article more or less meets the good article criteria but there are a couple minor issues which need to be resolved before I can promote it, primarily the first one listed in the comments. Good work on the article in general! Tayi Arajakate Talk 19:25, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
The issues are resolved now so I'll promote the article. Tayi Arajakate Talk 07:33, 27 July 2021 (UTC)


#### Comments
The last four producers and the editor mentioned in the infobox are not mentioned in those roles (or not mentioned at all) in the body nor are they cited in the infobox. Di Bonaventura Pictures is abbreviated as "di B Pictures" in the infobox, the shouldn't it be "dB Pictures"?
 Working Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 21:21, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
 Done 1. Added Panic Room format. 2. The company is credited as "di B Pictures" in the poster. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 21:30, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
"... with Halle Berry attached to star ..." The use of "attached to" in the phrase sounds odd, I would suggest using "featured as" instead. I would also suggest adding a comma before the "with".
 Done Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 21:21, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
"... while still owing the feature itself $15 million ..." This phrase isn't very clear. I would suggest adding a "worth" after itself.
 Done Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 21:21, 26 July 2021 (UTC)


#### Assessment
Comprehension: The comprehension is good. Pass

Verifiability: The article is verifiable. Pass

Comprehensiveness: The article is comprehensive. Pass

Neutrality: The article is neutral. Pass

Stability: The article is stable. Pass

Illustration: The article is well illustrated. Pass