# Talk:Evil in Middle-earth

This review is transcluded from Talk:Evil in Middle-earth/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: Chiswick Chap (talk · contribs) 09:33, 23 February 2025 (UTC)
Reviewer: TeenAngels1234 (talk · contribs) 19:00, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

I'll review this.--TeenAngels1234 (talk) 19:00, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

Thank you very much! I believe this article, which I've written from scratch, is in good shape. I'll respond promptly to any concerns. Chiswick Chap (talk) 19:05, 10 March 2025 (UTC)
In "Involving sapience" there is a link to Catholicism when it's already linked in the first section.
Unlinked.
"Like Satan in the Book of Genesis, who was the highest of the angels, he chooses to go his own way rather than to follow that of the creator, and creates discord". Is Satan really portrayed like this in the Genesis? If I remember correctly, there is just the presence of the snake in the Eve and Adam's fall story (without identifying it with Satan), but his fall is not described in the Genesis - and Satan is not even described as a fallen angel in the Bible, at least the Jewish Bible. I can be wrong. Anyway, I would cut the "Like Satan in the Book of Genesis, who was the highest of the angels," part, since the same explanation is repeated few sentences later.
Done.
@Chiswick Chap: I agree: the article is basically already a GA. Nothing wrong detected. Good job.--TeenAngels1234 (talk) 21:04, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

TeenAngels1234: Thank you very much! We still need to have a source check, i.e. spot-checks on a sample of the citations. Chiswick Chap (talk) 21:14, 10 March 2025 (UTC)
OK, I checked them and everything is OK. Some examples:
Rosebury 2008: "The structural resemblances here to the Christian myth are already clear enough: Eru Iluvatar is God, the Ainur are like angels, and Melkor is clearly shaping up for the role of fallen angel, Satan or Lucifer. The basic Augustinian apparatus in which nothing is created by evil, but evil arises from the free will of created beings, is in place" (p. 113).
Abbot: "Perhaps the following statement from 'Monsters and Critics' provides a better indication of Tolkien's perspectives regarding the true monster: 'The distinction between an devilish ogre, and a devil revealing himself in ogre-form – between a monster, devouring the body and bringing temporal death, that is inhabited by a cursed spirit, and a spirit of evil aiming ultimately at the soul and bringing eternal death (even though he takes a form of visible horror that may bring and suffer physical pain) – is a real and important one'. ... Tolkien may have conceived the early Sauron as no more than a 'devilish ogre' – a lycanthropic 'moral denizen' – but by the Third Age this monster has undergon what, for the Christian Tolkien, was the ultimate transformation". (pp. 54-55)
"In the first passage the author of Relevation describes four horsemen, who personify evils that beset humanity. ... The significance of this passage for our purposes is to illustrate that greater emotional impact occurs when one personifies essentially abstracts evils. In The Lord of the Rings we first discover the ringwraiths as terror inspiring horsemen who bring these four evils into the world. They are bent on conquest, war, death, and the land they rule is non-productive" (Treloar, II. Apocalypse and Privation, p. 57).
Is it well written?
A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct: 

B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation: 

Is it verifiable with no original research?
A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline: 

B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines: 
C. It contains no original research: 

D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism: 

Is it broad in its coverage?
A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic: 
B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style): 

Is it neutral?
It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each: 
Is it stable?
It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute: 

Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content: 

B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions: 

Overall:
Pass or Fail: 
A well-written, clear, sourced article. Nothing to add. Good job.--TeenAngels1234 (talk) 21:08, 18 March 2025 (UTC)