# Talk:Deep in Love

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Deep in Love. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120407031110/http://www.zpav.pl/rankingi/listy/dyskoteki/index.php?lang=2&idlisty=541 to http://www.zpav.pl/rankingi/listy/dyskoteki/index.php?lang=2&idlisty=541
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:11, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

Cartoon network freak "Boxer composed the song in 2011 in Morocco; while she and Morena were driving to a show there by car, he came up with a melody and recorded a demo on his mobile phone." = confirmation of the song being recorded in 2011, as not only does it ref composing but it says he came up with a melody for it and recorded a demo; this shows that's when recording began and it can't have continued after 2011 since that's when the song was released. --Kyle Peake (talk) 16:00, 5 June 2019 (UTC)

I will get to reviewing this at a later date, but not currently as they are major issues that need at least commenting on from the nominator, if not fixed (reasons should be provided below). These are:

Why is 2011 not listed as the recorded year? I have commented on this further above.
Can you find a source either stating the genre or breaking down the song enough that it describes "Deep in Love" as fitting a music genre?
Any reviews possible to start a critical reception section? If not, you could just add that source I referenced on the GA1 page to the commercial performance section and rename it reception, as it would be describing critical and commercial; see "Morena".
--Kyle Peake (talk) 18:57, 5 June 2019 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Deep in Love/GA2. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Kyle Peake (talk · contribs) 07:45, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
I'll get to this before Sunday if you have responded to my comments on the talk page before then. Those are the major issues that I can't really start reviewing the article without them being addressed; there are other issues too that I will point out. --Kyle Peake (talk) 07:45, 6 June 2019 (UTC)


### Infobox and lead
2011 should be listed as the recorded year in the infobox as the background and release section clearly sources it as such "composed the song in 2011"
"It was later released as a CD single in Italy on 31 October 2011 by Step and Go, while also made available" → "It was released as a CD single in Italy on 31 October 2011 through Step and Go, while later made available"
Change target of Radio ZU to Intact Media Group


### Background and release
"Italy on 31 October 2011 by Step and Go" → "Italy on 31 October 2011 via Step and Go"


### Music video and promotion
Good, apart from the same target issue with Radio ZU as the lead


### Commercial performance
"The aforementioned broadcast monitoring service also conducted a year-end chart for 2012, where the track was ranked at number 29." → "Media Forest conducted a year-end radio airplay chart for 2012, where the track ranked at number 29."


### Credits and personnel
Good


### Track listings
Good


### Charts
Good


### Certifications
Good


### Release history
Good


### References
Refs 7, 8 and 9 should have Amazon (company) as the target
Set Federazione Industria Musicale Italiana as the target for ref 17
Ref 21 should target Polish Society of the Phonographic Industry


### Final comments and verdict
Looks much better this time around, just a few minor issues that need fixing and I'll pass this as a GA. --Kyle Peake (talk) 15:55, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
@Kyle Peake: Everything has been addressed. Cartoon network freak (talk) 18:03, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
@Cartoon network freak: Love it! I'll gladly  Pass this. --Kyle Peake (talk) 18:04, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
@Kyle Peake: Hi and thank you very much for passing! Is there any possibility you can also get to "On a Sunday", the last one I'm demanding. Greets; Cartoon network freak (talk) 18:05, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
Cartoon network freak Will do, do you think you could review "Low Lights" for me actually? --Kyle Peake (talk) 18:23, 7 June 2019 (UTC)