# Talk:Human interactions with microbes

The article title "microbes and man" is sexist, we must move the article to "microbes and humans". Andreas Mamoukas (talk) 14:31, 2 February 2017 (UTC)

The first title I considered for the new article was "Microbes in culture", in line with the series of articles that I've created on "Living things in culture", Plants in culture, etc. I couldn't use the matching "Microbes in culture", as "culture" can mean "a microbial culture on an agar jelly" and this wasn't an article about how to make nutrient media. I tried "Microbes in human culture" to dilute the problem but it's klunky and not entirely free of ambiguity. "Microbes and humans" lacks the alliterative ring that presumably attracted Postgate's publishers to release a book under the title of "Microbes and Man" (4th edition 2008, so it's still current). Both probably fail to suggest this is about culture, sounding more like social aspects of disease, perhaps. If we have to change the current title, I think we'd best go back to "Microbes in human culture" which is at least clear. Chiswick Chap (talk) 15:13, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Just came across this at Wikipedia:Village pump (miscellaneous). I agree with the reasons given by Chiswick Chap that though klunky, "Microbes in human culture" is probably the best title. I also wanted to say that this is a great article! Thanks for all of the work that must have been put into it! ‑‑YodinT 15:58, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Thanks. Chiswick Chap (talk) 16:02, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Microbes and human culture sounds good. I did not know of the book Microbes and Man, I will send to the publishers of the book an email to ask them to change the sexist title if they release a new edition of the book. Andreas Mamoukas (talk) 17:50, 2 February 2017 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Microbes in human culture. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141217124035/http://www.ajms.co.in/sites/ajms/index.php/ajms/article/viewFile/559/488 to http://www.ajms.co.in/sites/ajms/index.php/ajms/article/viewFile/559/488
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://tamar.tau.ac.il/~eshel/papers/ScienceNov6.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:26, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

Or even - part of humans is microbes. Article seems to approach these two as things apart.
EE 88.104.102.175 (talk) 12:44, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

What are the sources for the 1st section of this article? Can you add their links and cite them please? ~~~~ GradStudent4Life (talk) 15:45, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

I would like us to discuss and also state reasons why human re more intelligents than Microbes 102.91.48.92 (talk) 10:14, 17 December 2023 (UTC)