# Talk:Melina Perez

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Melina Perez. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070609013150/http://corporate.wwe.com/news/2002/2002_10_07.jsp to http://corporate.wwe.com/news/2002/2002_10_07.jsp
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070817145846/http://www.glorywrestling.com/gg/Kyra/K.asp to http://www.glorywrestling.com/gg/Kyra/K.asp
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070817145846/http://www.glorywrestling.com/gg/Kyra/K.asp to http://www.glorywrestling.com/gg/Kyra/K.asp
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:23, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Melina Perez. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090109002836/http://www.wrestlezone.com/article.php?articleid=214382253 to http://www.wrestlezone.com/article.php?articleid=214382253
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:57, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

Please refrain from edit warring and engaging in page ownership behavior. Clearly multiple other editors disagree with the reliability of the source. Right now you are insisting that the page reflect your subjective opinion that this particular person is lying simply because others have lied about similar subjects in the past. It is not important that the page reflect that a gossip site reported something. You cannot state as fact second-hand anonymous information. PWInsider is not a primary source. This can wait until confirmation by a primary source, if even such confirmation ever comes. UniNoUta (talk) 16:42, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

Indepdendent sources 101. 	Examples of  no independent sources. "You're writing about… a person" "Independent	News media, popular or scholarly book" "Non-independent Person, family members, friends, employer, employees".  Again, PWInsider is a reliable sources, known for fact checking. After talking with several sources, they confirmed Melina signed with WWE. It's reliable and did their job. It's not a "we hear something" or "Melina is in talks with WWE". It's proved in the past, when they confirmed Morrison contract with WWE. Melina isn't independent about this information, since she is too involved with the news. In this case, Melisa isn't independent about the subject, she and the promotion are involved and have an interest ( a big surprise). PWInsider is not a primary source, but that's why Wikipedia uses secondary, independent sources. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 16:55, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
PWInsider is reliable. For example, they confirmed Sarah Stock was fired from WWE, even when WWE didn't confirm the information. Why PWInsider is reliable for a released wrestler but not for a hired wrestler? --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 17:00, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
Because a site was correct about one thing in the past does not mean they are automatically correct about all other things in the future. They are, in fact, incorrect about many things. Just as a recent example: in March of this year they reported that Nia Jax would be returning from injury and going to the Smackdown brand. Six months later and she's still not. Now are we to assume that because they were wrong about one thing they must be wrong about everything? No. But anonymous third-party reports cannot be taken as fact until they are confirmed. Thus far, it is only your opinion that PW Insider has "confirmed" this. Wikipedia is not for opinions.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by UniNoUta (talk • contribs) 17:25, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
Not my opinion, PWInsider words. These are no anonymous third party reports. PWInsider has an staff that confirm the information with several other sources, trusted by the staff. That's journalism. If several trusted sources by the Insider are questioned and they agree, that's journalism. You are the one who thinks PWInsider is not reliable based on your opinion or because the all might WWE doesn't confirm, even when Melina and WWE aren't independent to the subject. It' not the same as the Nia Jax, since they're reporting furute plans for her, not facts.  --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 17:52, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

There is an ongoing wildfire in LA and she has not been seen 2A00:23C4:2298:2D01:8D94:4FFF:E1DF:2636 (talk) 18:02, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

News reports are asking for the her wherebouts she is reprted missing aimed at the LA Fires. No information has been announced on her well being. She is not answering her cell phone and has not posted social media in several days. hoping for a safe outcome. 47.195.198.197 (talk) 20:56, 12 January 2025 (UTC)