# Talk:French cruiser Coëtlogon

This review is transcluded from Talk:French cruiser Coëtlogon/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: CPA-5 (talk · contribs) 00:22, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Claim. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 00:22, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Body and lead

Can we expand the lead just a little bit like where she did her trails and operating?
I don't know where she did her trials
the earlier unprotected cruiser Milan I'd think we better can add French here because I believe some people can be confused to Milan and think she was an Italian ship (because Milan is in Italy)?
Is that really necessary? We're talking about French cruisers, isn't the context clear?
The unprotected cruiser Milan was Same as above.
Link ardent supporter.
To what?
Is there no link or so?
To "ardent supporter"? No, that doesn't have any specific meaning beyond what the words themselves mean
No link for some of the guns?
We don't have an article for them
which was kept in commission for only four months per year If this commission lasted only four months a year what happened with her in the rest of the year?
They were decommissioned, but I don't know when they entered and left service
By January 1901, Coëtlogon and both of her sister ships --> "By January 1901, she and both of her sister ships"
Done
about 2,000 long tons (2,032 t) displacement Normal or full load same in the infobox.
Conway's doesn't say, unfortunately
Infobox

The tons don't match with the body.
Yeah they do - you're looking at the wrong number in the body - check the second paragraph
Images

"File:Forbin-Poyet.jpg" is there a tag which states it's in the public domain over the whole world?
I'm not sure what you're asking; almost all countries use some form of year PMA to determine copyright, so all of them that are 100 years or less are fine per the template. But I've added a US tag as well
Also just a question here is, do the NHHC's tags only speak for the US's domain?
Yes
Sources

Barry's OCLC doesn't say Washington D.C. but only Washington however this can be confused with the state Washington. Do you know a source or so which states it's made in D.C.? Same with Dorn, E. J. & Drake, J. C.
If you look at the source itself, yes, it says D.C.
Both Brassey's 1895s should have their letters like the citations say.
Done
All Brasseys have the same OCLC?
Yes, since it's a periodical
Gardiner's link uses the location: New York instead of London?
London is correct for the first edition that I'm using - this is the entry you're looking for
Are months really needed here? Except maybe both Brassey's 1895s should have a month or a letter to separate them.
Yes, those are monthly periodicals so the month is required. Brassey's was an annual; there's no month
That's it from me I think. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 14:28, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

@CPA-5: - anything left to address? Parsecboy (talk) 19:53, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
Hey Nate sorry for letting you wait for some time. I lost the ambition of Wikipedia and hadn't really time to reply (I had just started again with work and school —exams are coming too–. After a quick review, I think we should add years if possible in the image "File:French_cruiser_Coëtlogon_NH_66063.jpg" before I could pass it. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 18:34, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
@CPA-5: - no problem, things do come up. I don't have any years to add to the photos, unfortunately - I could say "date unknown", but I don't know if that really adds any information of value. Parsecboy (talk) 20:07, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
A pretty small article but it does meet the GA requirements; there is no reason to hold it back. Nice work as always. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 06:08, 31 May 2020 (UTC)