# Talk:Carlisle & Finch

This looks to be a possible copyright violation from the TCA webpage on C&F Irish Melkite (talk) 08:50, 20 October 2010 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Carlisle & Finch. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120423042717/http://terrypepper.com:80/lights/closeups/illumination/aerobeacon/dcb224.htm to http://www.terrypepper.com/lights/closeups/illumination/aerobeacon/dcb224.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:55, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Carlisle & Finch/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: The Rambling Man (talk · contribs) 14:20, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

Comments

Two sentences for lead feels short, I would aim for a sentence or so from every section in the article.
File:Carlisle & Finch logo.png has two n.a. in the fair use justification which is inadequate.
"at 182-184 Elm" en-dash.
"included ... including" repetitive.
"on April 17, 1897 with" comma after year.
"In that year, they" -> "That year" or "The same year"...
"After World War II, Brent" no need to link the war in this article.
"As of 2020," 2021 now, is this still valid?
"5-1/2 inches tall and ran on metal track with rails two inches" convert to metric, also be consistent with either words or numerals.
"factory in Plymouth, Connecticut in" comma after state.
"The locomotive included" link locomotive on first usage.
"of The Children’s Museum of Indianapolis." replace the curly apostrophe for a straight one.
"When World War I started" no need to link the war.
"with additional large orders Greece, Spain" from?
"manually activated screw " hyphenate manually-activated.
"lifetime of about 7 hours" seven.
"Xenon arc searchlights were introduced in the 1960s.[16] LED models became available in 2019.[17]" make it clear that C&F did this, not that the technology was generally available.
"fresnel lenses." aren't Fresnel capitalised?
"in landfall lights" what's that?
"Information plates.." no full stop required in this caption.
"Gasoline powered dynamo, 1912." ditto.
"from the open sea." [1] format that as a proper reference.
Avoid SHOUTING in reference titles.
Consistent date formats in refs.
"1894 establishments in Ohio" etc, the article says it's not clear if it was 1893 or 1894, so this (and other such categories) should be 1890s and not this specific year.
That's it, on hold. The Rambling Man (Stay alert! Control the virus! Save lives!!!!) 16:44, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for the quick review.  I've fixed everything except for "in landfall lights" what's that?.  There's a footnote explaining what a landfall light it.  Is that not sufficient?  -- RoySmith (talk) 00:05, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

Ugh, apparently putting a reference in a reference blows up.  I'm not sure how to fix that. -- RoySmith (talk) 00:07, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Worked around that. -- RoySmith (talk) 00:11, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Cool, nice updates, content with the article and satisfied that it meets the GA criteria.  Passing now.  The Rambling Man (Stay alert! Control the virus! Save lives!!!!) 10:09, 26 March 2021 (UTC)