# Talk:Henry de Lichton

1. Well written. Clear prose and layout. 
 Done
2. Accurate and verifiable. Footnotes from reliable sources. 
 Done
3. Broad. Major topics are covered with no unnecessary details. 
 Done
4. Neutral. 
 Done
5. Stable. 
 Done
6. Images. Appropriate with fair use rationale. 
 Done
Well done. Years w/o dates should be de-wiki-ed.  I will do this. -- SECisek 01:27, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

This discussion is transcluded from Talk:Henry de Lichton/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.


### GA Sweeps: Kept
As part of the WikiProject Good Articles, we're doing Sweeps to go over all of the current GAs and see if they still meet the GA criteria. I went through the article and made various changes, please look them over. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good Article. Altogether the article is well-written and is still in great shape after its passing in 2007. Continue to improve the article making sure all new information is properly sourced and neutral. If you have any questions, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. I have updated the article history to reflect this review. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 04:53, 18 July 2009 (UTC)