# Talk:Ojo de Agua Raid

Hi. Good work on this article. I have one observation: Note # 5, "US Army Armor School, p. 239" does not appear to be identified fully in the References section. Would it be possible to add these details, please? Also, I've made a few changes, mainly just copy editing/fixing typos etc. Please review and tweak as you feel necessary. Cheers. AustralianRupert (talk) 08:15, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

I added the ref to the ref section, i had a feeling i forgot something when i fifrst posted the article now i know what it was lol. The changes you made all are excellent.XavierGreen (talk) 19:11, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
Cheers, keep up the good work. AustralianRupert (talk) 22:04, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Raid on Ojo de Agua/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 21:31, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality: 

B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists: 
Add place of publication to refs.
Fixed.XavierGreen (talk) 22:47, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources: 
1 missing cite.
Added.XavierGreen (talk) 22:47, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary: 

C. No original research: 

Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects: 

B. Focused: 

Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias: 

Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc: 

Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales: 

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions: 

Overall:
Pass or Fail: 

I think i've fixed the issues above, thanks for your review!XavierGreen (talk) 22:47, 16 January 2011 (UTC)