# Talk:Falta Amor (song)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Falta Amor (song)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: K. Peake (talk · contribs) 10:45, 5 January 2022 (UTC)

Since this nom is nearly three months old, it is very appropriate to be wiped out currently! --K. Peake 10:45, 5 January 2022 (UTC)


### Infobox and lead
Add the animated video for the solo version alongside the main and if you can't, place solely this one in external links
"A solo version of the song was" → "A solo version was" since no album or anything else is mentioned previously
"to re-record the track." → "to re-record the song."
"by Torres and Rengifo." → "by the former two."
"it is about a man" → "the song speaks of a man"
"The track received" → "The song received"
Mention that it was certified by the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA)
"grieve a detached love" → "mourn a broken love" or something similar, to be less repetitive with the body
"To promote the song," → "To promote "Falta Amor","
"their own cover version" → "their own cover versions"


### Background and release
"Ten days later" → "10 days later" per MOS:NUM
"mentioning it is set for release" → "mentioning it being set for release"
[1][2] appear to be out of order per them not corresponding with the order of info
"The album was released for" → "Fantasia was released for"
Remove "on the album" after second track because this is implied
Either remove PopSugar per WP:RSSM or replace with a reliable source that published the interview
"and hoped there would still be a chance" → "and hoped for a chance" to avoid direct quoting so much
"that he planned" → "that he had planned"
"Yatra told the magazine about collaborating" → "Yatra said about collaborating" because we already know this is for the magazine
"during an Instagram live:" → "on Instagram Live:" with the wikilink per MOS:LINK2SECT
"It marked the first collaboration" → ""Falta Amor" marked the first collaboration"
Remove comma after extended play


### Music and lyrics
Audio sample looks good!
Remove wikilink on Latin pop
"while its production was" → "The production was" as a new sentence with this and the length since the current one is too long
Add a comma before which
"is influenced by" → "was influenced by"
"its emotion grows until" → "the emotion grows until"


### Critical reception
These reviews should be ordered by what the critics focused on specifically, placing the stuff mentioned in the lead first probably
Remove wikilink on Rolling Stone
Italicise Clarín
"complimented its lyrics that" → "commented that the lyrics"
Too much is quoted from LatinPop Brasil, so reword parts
"on its own right, naming it a" → "in its own right, seeing a"
"in the lyrical plane". He continued to praise its" → "in the lyrical plane", continuing by praising its"
"were able to convey" → "managed to convey" per the translation of source
Too much is quoted from Univision, so reword parts


#### Accolades
Add after playlist "of the most streamed songs of the year."


### Commercial performance
"with most top 20s" → "with the most top 20s"
Mention the date it was certified Latin platinum
"Besides the United States," → "Besides the US," per MOS:US


### Music videos
Img looks good!
"An accompanying animated video for the solo version" → "An animated music video for the solo version"
"for the music video" → "for the collaboration's music video"
"that the visual would be released simultaneously with the song's release" → "that it would be released simultaneously with the song"
Again, either remove PopSugar quote per WP:RSSM or find a different source stating this
"who do a choreography," → "who perform a choreography,"
See earlier regarding these PopSugar quotes
"Juan Vicente from Los 40 called it" → "Vicente called the music video"


### Live performances and appearances in media
Good


### Track listing
Good


### Credits and personnel
Good


### Charts
Good


### Certifications
Good


### Release history
Good


### References
Copyvio score is very high at 58.1% for PopSugar ref, but that will be removed due to unreliability and there are no other high scores, making this criterion a pass
Remove or replace ref 5 per WP:RSSM
Ref 57 is a duplicate of ref 56
Add the language parameter for ref 61


### External links
Remove the video since this is already in the infobox


### Final comments and verdict
 On hold until all of the issues are fixed; cruised through this one! --K. Peake 12:35, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
@Kyle Peake: Thank you so much for devoting your time on it. It is always an honor for me to have my nominated-articles reviewed by you. I fixed all the issues and changed or removed content based on PopSugar with replacing other references, I hope I haven't missed anything. If I had, please tell me to fix it. آرمین هویدایی (talk) 16:15, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
@آرمین هویدایی:  Pass time has come; the only problem was that more of the PopSugar quoting needed to be paraphrased, though I reworded the earlier area for you! --K. Peake 08:59, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
Thanks a lot. آرمین هویدایی (talk) 09:20, 7 January 2022 (UTC)