# Talk:Mississippi Highway 24

This review is transcluded from Talk:Mississippi Highway 24/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: TCN7JM (talk · contribs) 23:45, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
I will review this article after the Super Bowl. –TCN7JM 23:45, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
Starting review now, also going to add a KML. –TCN7JM 22:06, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
Lead/Infobox

The lead states that the route is 76.3 miles long, but the infobox says 76.0. Which is correct?
Fixed. Dough4872 04:56, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
Route description

Subject-verb agreement issues in the first sentence of the second paragraph.
Fixed. Dough4872 04:56, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
I'm seeing a lot of inconsistency in verbs used after subjects that include multiple highways such as "MS 24/MS 33." Either use a plural verb throughout the entire article or a singular one.
Made consistent. Dough4872 04:56, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
I wasn't going to comment on this, but it's bugging me more and more as I read the article. Similar to the PA Tpk. ACR, you have a lot of [verb]ing uses after commas that can easily be changed. History, too.
Changed. Dough4872 04:56, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
History

Is it possible to split the first paragraph in two to get rid of the large block of text?
Split. Dough4872 04:56, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
Major intersections

You use concurrency throughout the article, but overlap in this section. You should only use one.
Changed. Dough4872 04:56, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
Final verdict

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose):  b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): 
The prose is a bit off.
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 

It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 

It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 

It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 
No images, so it doesn't really matter
Overall: Just a few issues here. –TCN7JM 04:43, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
Pass/Fail:
Thanks for the review, I have replied to the above comments. Dough4872 04:56, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
Not a problem. I'm passing the article. Good job! –TCN7JM 04:58, 5 February 2013 (UTC)