# Talk:Interstate 55 in Louisiana

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Interstate 55 in Louisiana. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20130122053752/http://www.rd.com/slideshows/the-7-worst-roads-in-america/ to http://www.rd.com/slideshows/the-7-worst-roads-in-america/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 10:17, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Interstate 55 in Louisiana. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131016093226/http://gis.dotd.la.gov/DOTD_EIC/DOTDMapping/ to http://gis.dotd.la.gov/DOTD_EIC/DOTDMapping/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:58, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Interstate 55 in Louisiana/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: CycloneIsaac (talk · contribs) 19:05, 28 July 2017 (UTC)

Reviewing later.—CycloneIsaac (Talk) 19:05, 28 July 2017 (UTC)

"This twin-span concrete viaduct, known as the Manchac Swamp Bridge, is only 0.7 miles (1.1 km) shorter than the nearby Lake Pontchartrain Causeway, the world's longest continuous bridge over water." You should change the sentence so it doesn't sound as trivial. Maybe just mention it as the second longest continuous bridge?
I was not able to find a reliable source that numerically ranks the Manchac bridge (or the other runners-up to the Causeway), only its total length and its presence on lists of the world's longest bridges.  But I also thought it made sense to compare the two bridges since, apart from their similar lengths, they are located near each other and perform a similar function—connecting the New Orleans area with the North Shore of Lake Pontchartrain.  Would the sentence sound less trivial if I made the reason for the comparison more clear? Britinvasion64 (talk) 22:25, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
Yeah, that'll do it.—CycloneIsaac (Talk) 00:56, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
Done. Britinvasion64 (talk) 00:42, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
"Spanning 5.4 miles (8.7 km), the bypass was designed to connect seamlessly with US 51 at either end, facilitating the flow of traffic around the west side of both downtown areas and eliminating four right-angle turns." Sentence needs to be cited.
Done.  It was in my notes but somehow didn't make it into the article. Britinvasion64 (talk) 02:42, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
That should be it.—CycloneIsaac (Talk) 00:52, 7 August 2017 (UTC)