# Talk:Hot to Go!

College students are not professional music critics. They are college kids trying to get extra credit by writing for their student newspapers. I don't see why these opinions are any better than any random Internet blogger's opinion—some editors suggest that we should include them because they (usually) have editors checking their work. So? They're not music publications and not music critics. I have removed the paragraph of college kids weighing in on the song, and if reinstated, I am making it clear I will actively oppose the article becoming a GA with their irrelevant opinions included. Ss112 04:59, 26 July 2024 (UTC)

To be clear: I'm concerned about the use of college newspapers as sources on the rest of the article too but less so than including their opinions. Ss112 05:03, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
@Ss112: Fair enough. I was debating on whether or not if I should have even included them when I opted to take this on. I said yes initially because I felt initially they held some sort of value; but I do realize now that don't help too much. As for the others: I'll try to find something else if I can. Cheers, mate! Nascar9919 (he/him • t • c) 06:08, 26 July 2024 (UTC)

Can someone please take a look at the composition section of the article? The genres sourced are not listed, and new wave doesn’t have a source. I don’t know why we’re ignoring the sources—they’re there for a reason. Stating that they are unsourced makes no sense because they are sourced. 2600:1002:A105:CFE5:B963:731F:A20D:C031 (talk) 23:58, 1 June 2025 (UTC)