# Talk:Gawsworth Old Hall

Article needs to be massively expanded.
It should make use of sections.
Photos need to be added.
References and Citations are crucial for wikipedia, and so these must be added as the article is expanded. Make sure that as many as possible are "in-line" citations.(See WP:References, WP:V, and WP:CITE for guidance.)
 DDStretch  (talk) 09:33, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

Done. Peter I. Vardy (talk) 16:07, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Gawsworth Old Hall/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Pyrotec (talk) 10:38, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

I will review. 10:38, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
I've now reviewed the article in depth and found no "defects" that needed to be highlighted here: I've merely added a few wikilinks and added a template to appese the "Metric Police". This, itself, is a reflection of the high quality of the article. Pyrotec (talk) 11:36, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

A comprehensive article.
Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality: 

B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists: 

Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources: 
Well referenced.
B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary: 
Well referenced.
C. No original research: 

Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects: 

B. Focused: 

Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias: 

Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc: 

Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales: 

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions: 

Overall:
Pass or Fail: 

I'm delighted to award this article GA. Congratulations on producing another fine "Cheshire" article. Pyrotec (talk) 11:36, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 6 external links on Gawsworth Old Hall. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110711080217/http://www.gawsworthhall.com/history.html to http://www.gawsworthhall.com/history.html
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110711080337/http://www.gawsworthhall.com/index.html to http://www.gawsworthhall.com/index.html
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110711080441/http://www.gawsworthhall.com/events.html to http://www.gawsworthhall.com/events.html
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110711075841/http://www.gawsworthhall.com/the_tea_rooms.html to http://www.gawsworthhall.com/the_tea_rooms.html
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110711080854/http://www.gawsworthhall.com/weddings.html to http://www.gawsworthhall.com/weddings.html
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110711081229/http://www.gawsworthhall.com/open-air-theatre.html to http://www.gawsworthhall.com/open-air-theatre.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:02, 30 September 2017 (UTC)