# Talk:Flag of Raleigh, North Carolina

I've added this flag to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flags_whose_reverse_differs_from_the_obverse - it lacks an image of the reverse, hopefully someone can rectify that. -  Metalello talk 21:15, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Flag of Raleigh, North Carolina/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: No Great Shaker (talk · contribs) 15:14, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
Hello, I'll be happy to do this review. Will be back soon. No Great Shaker (talk) 15:14, 9 February 2021 (UTC)


### Basic GA criteria
GACR#1a. Well written: the prose is clear, concise and understandable. 
GACR#1a. Well written: the spelling and grammar are correct. 
GACR#1b. Complies with the MOS guidelines for lead sections. 
GACR#1b. Complies with the MOS guidelines for article structure and layout. 
GACR#1b. Complies with the MOS guidelines for words to watch. 
GACR#1b. Complies with the MOS guidelines for linking. 
GACR#1b. Complies with the MOS guidelines for writing about fiction – not applicable.
GACR#1b. Complies with the MOS guidelines for list incorporation – not applicable.
GACR#2a. Contains a list of all references in accordance with the layout style guideline. 
GACR#2b. All statements are verifiable with inline citations provided. 
GACR#2b. All inline citations are from reliable sources. 
GACR#2b. All quotations are cited and their usage complies with MOS guidelines. 
GACR#2c. No original research. 
GACR#2d. No copyright violations or plagiarism. 
GACR#3. Broad in its coverage but within scope and in summary style. 
GACR#4. Neutral (NPOV). 
GACR#5. Stable. 
GACR#6a. Images are at least fair use and do not breach copyright. 
GACR#6b. Images are relevant to the topic with appropriate captions. 
I'll be using this list to complete the review. No Great Shaker (talk) 15:52, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
I've done a preliminary read of the article which is stable and I'm happy with the images which are appropriate and seem to be free of any problems. It therefore passes GACR#5 and GACR#6. I need to read it in more depth and hope to have time for that tomorrow but there are a couple of points in the meantime:
1. Richmond isn't on the coast so should it be termed an East Coast City? The state may have an Atlantic shoreline but the city does not.
2. "Sir Raleigh" is incorrect. You can call him Sir Walter Raleigh in full or just Sir Walter, once you have established who he was. 
Back soon. All the best and stay safe. No Great Shaker (talk) 21:00, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

I have changed "Sir Raleigh" to "Sir Walter" and have removed the "East Coast" information entirely. I appreciate your initial review and look forward to further comments. Thank you! Jordano53 21:47, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Jordano, and thanks for the amendments. I've read the article again and it's fine. Very interesting, informative, well-written, well-sourced and a good article. Well done and I'm promoting it to GA. All the best and stay safe. No Great Shaker (talk) 15:38, 11 February 2021 (UTC)