# Talk:Grand Duchess Maria Nikolaevna of Russia

Someone add the burial place of Maria....  dont think that she is in St-Perer and st-paul at the moment... No anouncement have been done.

Maria was buried with the other family members in 1997. Anastasia and Alexei were most likely the two who were discovered most recently. The Russians based their identification of Anastasia on questionable physical evidence. --Bookworm857158367 (talk) 00:44, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
Maria (and alexis) is not wet buried according to the official government and according to the Romanov family association! http://romanovfundforrussia.org/family/ce.html  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.82.250.118 (talk) 13:07, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
American scientists identified the two missing bodies as Anastasia and Alexei. The body the Russians buried was too tall and a few years too old to have been Anastasia and was almost certainly Maria. The remains found last year were Anastasia and Alexei. --Bookworm857158367 (talk) 13:42, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

There were two Grand Duchess Maria Nikolaevna: ( probably even more, but two significant ones )
1.  Grand Duchess Maria  daughter of Tsar Nicholas I  born: 1819 / died: 1876
she married  Maximillian de Beauharnais
2.  Grand Duchess Maria  daughter of the last Tsar Nicholas II  born:1899  / died: 1918
she was executed by the Bolsheviks.
Since both their respective fathers were named: Nicholas, they both have the patronymic
of Nikolaevna(?)  -- there should be two distinct articles on these two with different
labels?  Right now there is only one article for the second one.  There are references/links to the first one
which are incorrectly linked to that article.  There does not appear to be an article on the
first Grand Duchess (1819-1876)  if so, the links should be corrected.

I was just wondering who put in the bit about Maria hemmorhaging in 1914??
I have never heard this before and just wondered what the historical source was. 
--SaraFL 11:48, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
I listed the source -- an old biography of Grand Duchess Olga Alexandrovna, quoting the grand duchess.--Bookworm857158367 17:51, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

June 27? I have to erase my entry of her birthday which I put on 26th of June! Where did you get that info, Lisa?   —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mashka1899 (talk • contribs) 05:19, 25 April 2009 (UTC) 
In 1900, the Old Style calender fell behind another day, so Maria's birthday is more accurately celebrated on the 27th of June, not the 26th.
Clockworkgirl21 08:41, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
According to [1] 14 June 1899 OS = 26 June 1899 NS all other calculations are irrelevant Alex Bakharev (talk) 05:43, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
There is now a remark in this wikipedia entry saying that in 1900 and later, her birthday came on 27 June new style; it would still have come on 14 June old style, which was then still in use in Russia.  Yes, the Old Style calendar fell behind an extra day in 1900 (this happened when the New Style calendar, which had no Feb. 29 that year, reached March 1), and this person was living when this happened.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.63.16.20 (talk) 14:47, 18 July 2013 (UTC) 

There have been several films, including the animated Anastasia (1997) and live action film of the same name starring Ingrid Bergman (1956). Also, there have been many novels focusing on the survival of the younger imperial children:
The Romanov Prophecy by Steven Berry in which Anastasia and Alexei were supposed to have survived. 
The Kitchen Boy by Robert Alexander in which one of the grand duchesses is rescued by one of her killers.
This has way more to do with Anastasia.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.136.71.163 (talk) 20:01, 3 October 2007 (UTC) 

This article has been reviewed as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. There are a couple of minor problems which should be addressed however. There are citations which appear in the middle of sentances. These should be moved to come after punctuation. There is also no need to repeatedly link Margaretta Eagar. Otherwise the article is excellent. The article history has been updated to reflect this review. Regards, Jackyd101 (talk) 00:52, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

I just went in and fixed some minor errors. The line about Louis Mountbatten, was in the article twice and I went in and removed the one where it made the least sence. There was also a place in the article where they referred to Maria as Tatiana which is not suprising since the same person wrote both articles and copied and pasted the paragraph.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.173.150.52 (talk) 04:20, 11 September 2010 (UTC) 

Someone's overhauled the section on Maria's death to where there is only one single theory listed now. It also makes assumptions regarding specific body identification which, officially, is still in dispute. Is there anyone who can work the other opinions back in there to make this section more diverse again and less narrow to one author's opinion? Thanks. --Tsukiakari (talk) 03:45, 9 February 2013 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Grand Duchess Maria Nikolaevna of Russia (1899–1918). Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20121021141816/http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070823/ap_on_re_eu/russia_czar_s_son to http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070823/ap_on_re_eu/russia_czar_s_son
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 21:28, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

Both this wiki-page and Mountbatten's own page confirm that he had a crush on her and kept her picture beside his bed until his death. But we don't know if they had ever met. Valetude (talk) 22:23, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Grand Duchess Maria Nikolaevna of Russia (1899–1918). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050824094901/http://www.struggler.org:80/GlorificationOfTheRoyalFamily.html to http://www.struggler.org/GlorificationOfTheRoyalFamily.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:33, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

The name Мария is transliterated to Mariia.

This description, "with the great strength of her grandfather Alexander III of Russia," needs a source. It sounds suspect; how could a young girl be as strong as a fully grown man? I'm tempted to delete it, but am first doing diligence, specifically checking Massie, which is cited for Maria's physical description.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by ChiHistoryeditor (talk • contribs) 16:39, 22 December 2019 (UTC) 

The actual biography section of this article is currently just one long block of text that is difficult to read. While this is a problem on its own, it's led to some information being repeated such as Maria and Anastasia wearing similar clothes. I also think the introductory description is a bit bloated but my major concern is the life and characteristics section. My suggestion is to rewrite some parts of it and break it down to make reading it a more pleasant experience in a similar way, though not necessarily identical, to how I broke it up in my edit. Zinalova (talk) 00:04, 27 July 2020 (UTC)

Karitiz added a section to "revolution and captivity" about a trial being held in Moscow in April of 1918. I have yet to find any record of this and I could not find the reference posted. If anyone has a source relating to the trial of Nicholas II and Alexandra, please send it to me as this is very important information. If not I will edit that section out as it is very misleading. CertifiedSleepyy (talk) 08:24, 13 September 2022 (UTC)