# Talk:Flekkefjord Line

This review is transcluded from Talk:Flekkefjord Line/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Starting review.Pyrotec (talk) 18:34, 21 May 2009 (UTC)


### Review
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality: 

B. MoS compliance: 

Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources: 
I guess you know what is needed by now - English-language citations.
B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary: 
I guess you know what is needed by now - English-language citations.
C. No original research: 

Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects: 

B. Focused: 

Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias: 

Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc: 

Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales: 

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions: 

Overall:
Pass or Fail: 

Congratulations, I'm awarding GA status.Pyrotec (talk) 19:34, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Flekkefjord Line. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20081226082548/http://www.flekkefjordbanen.org:80/dresin1.html to http://www.flekkefjordbanen.org/dresin1.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 00:03, 26 January 2016 (UTC)