# Talk:Makoto (Street Fighter)

I removed the note about her bra showing, since it seemed speculative and unnecessary. I don't know of anything that would suggest that she doesn't know her bra is showing, or that she's embaresed that it is showing. Also, it seems like an unnessesary point. May 4 User:El Cid

They are NOT. Check literally any well-edited anime character page and you won't see any. I have no idea why anyone would think that two completely unrelated characters would share a deliberate connection. And if it's not deliberate, well, it has no business being in an encyclopedia. I don't want to get into an edit war over this. --Marcg106 05:26, 3 November 2005 (UTC)

Would it be relevant to point out that she bears a striking resemblance to Akane Tendo from the Ranma 1/2 Anime?
--DanHibiki 08:06, 19 November 2005 (UTC)

A passage stating just that has been removed twice already, and I've gotta agree, it seems kind of pointless to mention. It would be one thing if there were documented/verifiable proof that the look was copied perhaps, but AFAIK there's not, so it ought to stay out (as stated above by Marcg106). --Locke Cole (talk) (e-mail) 08:21, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
I've taken out the character basis section as it seemed entirely unessesary. I left in the note in the trivia section about fan speculation, but I would really like to see some mention of this somewhere, or I'll consider deleting that as well.  El Cid 16:03, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

I always thought not, especially when considering the canon plot guide. However, just see her profile from SNK Vs. Capcom Card Fighters DS:
"This karate gal works to revive the Rindoukan dojo left her by late father in place of her grandfather and big bro, Ryu. To promote her dojo, she sets out to beat the world's best, and she finally beat Ryu and the others to reach her goal."
Of course, this game isn't canon, and some of the profiles seem contradictory to previously official statements... guess we'll have to take this one with a grain of salt until further notice.... The S 04:25, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

As the Twelve (Street Fighter) article has shown, the characters exclusive to Third Strike are apparently worthy of having their own articles, if they're cleaned up a little bit. I'm going to revert the article back to it's original status once I finish writing more content into it. MonopolyMan (talk) 18:21, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

No, they really aren't. Nobody has bothered to merge that article yet, that's all. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 02:45, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Makoto (Street Fighter). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121017173139/http://www.capcom.co.jp/newproducts/consumer/3rd/chara/index.html to http://www.capcom.co.jp/newproducts/consumer/3rd/chara/index.html
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100828102806/http://www.ugo.com/games/top-50-street-fighter-characters?page=2 to http://www.ugo.com/games/top-50-street-fighter-characters?page=2
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.1up.com/do/minisite?cId=3156908
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:16, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Makoto (Street Fighter). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071201180347/http://www.fightersgeneration.com/shop/shop.html to http://www.fightersgeneration.com/shop/shop.html
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071213072013/http://strategywiki.org/wiki/Street_Fighter_III/Characters/Makoto to http://strategywiki.org/wiki/Street_Fighter_III/Characters/Makoto
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:10, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Makoto (Street Fighter). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100328114637/http://bitmob.com/articles/super-street-fighter-4-profiles-makoto to http://bitmob.com/articles/super-street-fighter-4-profiles-makoto
Added archive https://archive.is/20130123183900/http://gdc.gamespot.com/story/6253280/super-street-fighter-iv-updated-hands-on-%96-hakan-ibuki-makoto-and-dudley to http://gdc.gamespot.com/story/6253280/super-street-fighter-iv-updated-hands-on-%96-hakan-ibuki-makoto-and-dudley
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101123230047/http://ps3.gamezone.com/reviews/item/super_street_fighter_iv_360_review/ to http://ps3.gamezone.com/reviews/item/super_street_fighter_iv_360_review/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:56, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Makoto (Street Fighter)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Tintor2 (talk · contribs) 03:03, 13 May 2023 (UTC)

 
Good work with the article. In the case of a FA there would be more stuff to do but this perfect for a GA.Tintor2 (talk) 03:03, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a. (prose, spelling, and grammar): 

y

b. (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): 

It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a. (reference section): 

b. (citations to reliable sources): 

c. (OR): 

d. (copyvio and plagiarism): 

It is broad in its coverage.
a. (major aspects): 

b. (focused): 

It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 

It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): 
y#::

b. (appropriate use with suitable captions): 

y

Overall:
Pass/fail: 

(Criteria marked  are unassessed)