# Talk:Iyarkai

I removed the following quote box from the article because it doesn't appear to be relevant to the Production section. This is also WP:UNDUE. See article history for full attribution.

 Baffle☿gab 21:09, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Iyarkai/GA2. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Veera Narayana (talk · contribs) 12:24, 26 February 2023 (UTC)

 
Here are some of my concerns with this article. Please resolve them and let me know. Veera Narayana 12:39, 26 February 2023 (UTC)

I would suggest you inform the readers first that the film is based on a book and then summarise what the film is about, instead of the other way aroudn we see in this article.
Please do not mention low budget in the lead, and write the actual budget itself. We need not make such mentions, unless it is a no-budget film like Christopher Nolan's Following.
"Marudhu befriends Nancy and helps her search for Mukundan but when Marudhu reveals that he loves Nancy, she distances herself from him. They reconcile and become friends." -- This line can be phrased better. I leave it to you how, but for the way it is, the line is very clumsy.
"The story is based on Jananathan's friend's uncle, who right after getting married, went alone on a boat voyage in the Mediterranean Sea and got lost while his wife awaited his return." -- So, the film is not based on a book? If yes, please provide a vlid reference and the details of the subplots inspired from that book. Or remove those details from the lead entirely, and replace them by a summary of the Production section.
Mention who Ramkumar Ganesan is. As in, a filmmaker or a film producer and distributor etc.
If i get it right, "Kutti" means small or young in Tamil. Please let non-Tamil readers knwow the same.
@Veera Narayana: I have tried to address all of your concerns. Since I could not find any source to support the fact that "the subplot involving a man having unrequited love for a woman" is based on the book "White Nights", I have removed it. DareshMohan (talk) 23:24, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
In my honest opinion, this article would need more expansion. Having said that, my own searches gave very limited results, and from what you managed to gather here is definitely a good work. Recognising such work here is of paramount importance, hence i promote this one. In the future, though, do try to expand this article whenever you can. Congratulations! Veera Narayana 06:06, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a. (prose, spelling, and grammar): 

b. (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): 

It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a. (reference section): 

b. (citations to reliable sources): 

c. (OR): 

d. (copyvio and plagiarism): 

It is broad in its coverage.
a. (major aspects): 

b. (focused): 

It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 

It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): 

b. (appropriate use with suitable captions): 

Overall:
Pass/fail: 

(Criteria marked  are unassessed)