# Talk:James Dutton (Royal Marines officer)

This review is transcluded from Talk:James Dutton (Royal Marines officer)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Thurgate (talk) 16:33, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)
It is reasonably well written.
prose:   (MoS): 

It is factually accurate and verifiable.

It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 

It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars etc.: 

It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 

Overall:
Pass/Fail: 


### Comments
1. should brigadier be General brigadier?

No, the rank is Brigadier. It's not considered a general officer rank, unlike the equivalent Brigadier General in other forces.
2. The Pentagon. Suggest - A link for this.

 Done
3. served as. Suggest - he served as

 Done
4. with seniority from October 1975. As in command of the unit? 

No, this is seniority in his rank, which determines dates of promotion
5.  [ISAF]. Does ISAF need to be brackets?

Yes, because the passage is a quote from Dutton, but he didn't specifically say ISAF. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts?   17:12, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

I've put the article on hold for seven days to allow you to address the issues I've brought up. Feel free to contact me on my talk page, or here with any concerns. Thurgate (talk) 16:33, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for the review. I'd be keen to take this article further, so are there any other issues that might need to be sorted before it could get beyond GA? HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts?   17:12, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
Hmm, to be honest I'm not the best person to ask, but I could see more details of his career pre 9/11 as a help and also another picture would be nice somewhere.
Anyway, nice article and good luck taking it further. Passed. Thurgate (talk) 17:22, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on James Dutton (Royal Marines officer). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100825174857/http://www.navynews.co.uk:80/articles/2003/0312/0003120801.asp to http://www.navynews.co.uk/articles/2003/0312/0003120801.asp
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 17:48, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on James Dutton (Royal Marines officer). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131210222317/http://www.chronicle.gi/headlines_details.php?id=31996 to http://www.chronicle.gi/headlines_details.php?id=31996
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:15, 26 May 2017 (UTC)