# Talk:James Markham Ambler

This review is transcluded from Talk:James Markham Ambler/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: UnidentifiedX (talk · contribs) 08:16, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
Hello! I will be reviewing the article. Please allow 1-3 days for the assessment to be completed.


### Notified
 The nominator and noted co-nominator have been notified of the ongoing review.


### Assessment
Comprehension:

Verifiability:

Comprehensiveness:

Neutrality:

Stability:

Illustration:


### Comments
Thanks for taking the review, UnidentifiedX, I appreciate it. Let me know if you have any comments, and feel free to take your time. I might be a bit busy in the next two days, but we have @Delqa: as the co-nominator. – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 10:45, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for the response. I want to ensure you are aware of what is going on regarding the review and its status. I have made a few edits and have added a few things to the article; I will continue to do so. I expect the review to be completed within the next 48 hours. Have a good day! UnidentifiedX (talk) 19:58, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
Thanks! I made some change in your suggested wording. – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 20:03, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

Fair enough. I just need to do the MoS check and then I’ll pass the article. In the meantime I’ll get something done about the orphan link Christopher J. Huggard - UnidentifiedX (talk) 18:52, 30 May 2022 (UTC)


#### Conclusion
Congratulations! The article has passed the GA assessment.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by UnidentifiedX (talk • contribs) 07:03, 31 May 2022 (UTC)