# Talk:Ohio State Route 167

This review is transcluded from Talk:Ohio State Route 167/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Newyorkadam (talk · contribs) 19:07, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
I'll take this. I'll start it tomorrow.
Quick-glance comments:

SR 538, which is wikilinked in this article, just redirects back to Ohio State Route 167 (the article nominated for GA)
I know a photo of the route isn't required, but it certainly can't hurt. Can you please try to find one?
Y No disambiguation links in this article
Other than that it looks good :) I'll start this either later today or tomorrow!
-Newyorkadam (talk) 21:19, 13 January 2014 (UTC)Newyorkadam

Done.—CycloneIsaac–E-Mail 23:41, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
Comments:

Please wikilink 'US 6', 'at-grade intersection'
Done.—CycloneIsaac–E-Mail 21:15, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
Please add a reference after this line, because it's statistical data: 'The highest traffic count is in Jefferson, where 2,260 vehicles travel on the road on average.'
Eh, added.—CycloneIsaac–E-Mail 21:15, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
Please try to find some more references for the 'Route description' section. There aren't any references for where the route is located.
Map and coordinates aren't enough?—CycloneIsaac–E-Mail 21:15, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
Please remove the comma in this line: 'SR 167 was designated in 1923, as a short connector from SR 7 to the Pennsylvania state line east of Richmond Center.'
Done.—CycloneIsaac–E-Mail 21:15, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
In this line, what is Richmond Center? Is there an article about it (if so, please wikilink it). Please describe what it is. 'SR 167 was designated in 1923, as a short connector from SR 7 to the Pennsylvania state line east of Richmond Center.'
No link, but mentioned what it is.—CycloneIsaac–E-Mail 21:15, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
Please change 'Around 1969' to 'In about 1969' or something similar, to me it sounds moar correct.
Done.—CycloneIsaac–E-Mail 21:15, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
In the 'Major intersections' section, you have a note for every destination except for SR 93. Could you please add a note :)?
No. It's optional.—CycloneIsaac–E-Mail 21:15, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
Everything else looks good! I'll do the table once you go over my comments :) -Newyorkadam (talk) 20:28, 14 January 2014 (UTC)Newyorkadam

Final decision comment:
Passed! Nice article :) Looking forward to reviewing many more! -Newyorkadam (talk) 23:10, 14 January 2014 (UTC)Newyorkadam