# Talk:Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone (film)

Why are we crediting Orchestrator Conrad Pope?  There is no reason to.  We should save his name for the soundtrack page.  Also, he's not the only orchestrator for the first three Potters, seriously, why don't we just credit every single individual who was associated with the music?  The music is by John Williams and no one else, why should we credit someone who didn't write a single piece of music for the film, but only arranged it?  My opinion, remove his credit and relocate it to the soundtrack page, because if there isn't a credit for Pope on the Soundtrack page, why should there be a credit for him on the film's page?  ThatsGoodTelevision ThatsGoodTelevision, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

The easy solution to this disagreement is to list both names of the film in the title of the article and the article itself, identifying "Philosopher's Stone" with Europe, and "Sorcerer's Stone" with the U.S. Dcenters (talk) 20:51, 28 October 2024 (UTC)

The American name already redirects to this article and is listed promptly in the first sentence of the lead. This seems sufficient to me. DonIago (talk) 21:00, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
It's fine as it is, coming out first in the UK, so using that title. The leading sentence already reads: Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone (also known as Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone in the United States). Esowteric + Talk + Breadcrumbs 21:01, 28 October 2024 (UTC)

The movie mentions it as a Sorcerer's stone and not Philosopher's stone. 2409:40C1:4038:654D:500D:41FF:FE46:34C5 (talk) 12:32, 5 July 2025 (UTC)

Literally mentioned in the first sentence of this article. DonIago (talk) 14:51, 5 July 2025 (UTC)