# Talk:Humfrey Gale

Was his promotion to Lieutenant General in 44 only brevet? Otherwise why the honorary promotion in 1947?--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 18:54, 29 August 2010 (UTC)

Yes. Added this to the text. Hawkeye7 (talk) 20:19, 29 August 2010 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Humfrey Gale/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Jim Sweeney (talk) 09:12, 10 September 2010 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose):  b (MoS): 

It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 

It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 

It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars etc.: 

It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 

Overall:
Pass/Fail: 


#### Comments
3A Is there any way of finding out what the MC was awarded for ?--Jim Sweeney (talk) 09:12, 10 September 2010 (UTC)

Not that I know of. The London Gazette records only the award. I checked the WO medal card but it contains no further information. His full personnel file is unavailable, as he served in WWII. Hawkeye7 (talk) 00:05, 11 September 2010 (UTC)