# Talk:Federalist No. 24

This review is transcluded from Talk:Federalist No. 24/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: AryKun (talk · contribs) 19:53, 29 January 2024 (UTC)

Wikisource link to infobox.
"already did not exist under the law of the time" But they did exist in 2 state constitutions, so this statement shouldn't be so all-encompassing.
"peacetime. He says that it is merely an assertion that lacks an argument behind it." to  "peacetime, calling it a mere assertion without strong justifications."
The summary should also include the reasons Hamilton prefers professional soldiers to militiamen and his discussion on the necessity of a navy and garrisons protecting it.
"had such a provision regarding standing armies" Unclear what this is referring to, just say "had a prohibition on raising a standing army" or similar instead.
"complacence in that" to "complacence because"?
"advocated garrisons in the western frontier and along the eastern coast" to "advocated for the establishment of garrisons along the western frontier and eastern coast"
Sources seem reliable and are properly formatted; will perform spot-checks later.
Spot-checks: All sources checked verified the claims made.
"Federalist Essays in Historic Newspapers". Library of Congress.
"Federalist Papers: Primary Documents in American History". Library of Congress.
Scott, Kyle (2013). The Federalist Papers: A Reader's Guide.
Epstein, David F. (2007). The Political Theory of The Federalist.
Nice work overall. AryKun (talk) 15:13, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
AryKun, I've made all suggested changes. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 18:53, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Passing now. AryKun (talk) 07:52, 10 February 2024 (UTC)