# Talk:Haw Par Villa MRT station

Image:NS logo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 23:55, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Haw Par Villa MRT Station. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added {{dead link}} tag to https://app-pac.mica.gov.sg/data/vddp/embargo/6260896.htm
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111227192632/http://blogs.todayonline.com/forartssake/2011/09/21/circle-line-art-the-final-destinations-a-sneak-peek to http://blogs.todayonline.com/forartssake/2011/09/21/circle-line-art-the-final-destinations-a-sneak-peek/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:44, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Aljunied MRT Station which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RMCD bot 09:32, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Haw Par Villa MRT station/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Dora the Axe-plorer (talk · contribs) 06:27, 24 September 2022 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, spelling, and grammar):  b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): 

It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):  d (copyvio and plagiarism): 

It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 

It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 

It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 

Overall:
Pass/Fail: 

Just wondering, if the names Mass Rapid Transit, Circle line and Jurong Region line were abbreviated as MRT, CCL and JRL in the lead, respectively, do they need to be repeated inside the body in full and have the abbreviations again? Dora the Axe-plorer (explore) 07:57, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

I think so, given I've received plenty of similar feedback before. You can check other GA articles like Bright Hill MRT station or Mayflower MRT station ZKang123 (talk) 07:20, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
Right, that's not a problem then. Overall a well-written article, properly cited and verifiable; I'll be passing the nomination. I was at Haw Par Villa yesterday so this review had me looking for the Art-in-Transit work at the station. Never knew this was also a CD Shelter. Interesting. Dora the Axe-plorer (explore) 13:53, 28 September 2022 (UTC)