# Talk:Megami Tensei Gaiden: Last Bible

Image:Lastbible3titlescreen.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 04:38, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Megami Tensei Gaiden: Last Bible/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: GamerPro64 (talk · contribs) 01:39, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
I will be preparing to review this article soon. GamerPro64 01:39, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
Just an update on the review. I haven't forgotten about it. I vetted the lead and "Titles" sections and they're pretty good so the article is looking solid right now. GamerPro64 03:10, 5 December 2015 (UTC)
Okay so I found some issues with the "Titles" section. The Hardcore Gaming 101 links do not mention "Another Bible" and "Last Bible Special" in it. It's on the next page. Also, in said HG101 link, they call the place in "Last Bible III" Megaro Polis while the article calls it Megalopolis. Which ones correct? GamerPro64 04:44, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

@GamerPro64: Oh hey, it seems HG101 has reorganized their Megami Tensei article since I worked on this. That's annoying, but I'll fix it. "Megaro Polis" is an incorrect romanization on their part - "Megaroporisu" (メガロポリス) is the Japanese word for "megalopolis", which the in-game location is named after. What should I do about this? Change it to "Megaro Polis" anyway? Or to "Megaroporisu"? Or just leave it as it is?--IDVtalk 05:42, 5 December 2015 (UTC)
I'm not sure. Have you played the game before? Maybe adding dialogue from the game might clear things up. GamerPro64 05:49, 5 December 2015 (UTC)
All right, I have fixed the HG101 thing. And no, I have only played a bit of the first game. Would it be okay if just cite a Japanese source and call it Megaroporisu (メガロポリス; lit. "megalopolis")?--IDVtalk 05:56, 5 December 2015 (UTC)
Scratch that - I can't find any reliable Japanese sources that mention the city. Since it's unclear, and apparently not treated like an important piece of information by reliable sources, I just went ahead and removed the name.--IDVtalk 06:58, 5 December 2015 (UTC)
So near the end of the Development section it talks about the catalog numbers to these soundtracks. I'm not seeing why mentioning that is important in the article. GamerPro64 00:24, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

Agreed, and fixed. This article is a translation of one I originally wrote at the Swedish Wikipedia, where it's standard to have a music section with information about music composers and the music albums etc. When doing the translation and merging the music information with the main development section, I forgot to remove this.--IDVtalk 01:02, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
And from the Reception section I don't see the review for Last Bible III from Famitsu. I think they might have deleted it. GamerPro64 01:09, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

The Last Bible III review is found here. You are linking to the Last Bible II page, which does seem to have problems of its own now that I look at it - it seems to be used as citation for Famitsu's LB1 review, for things that aren't mentioned in either (???). I have no idea how this happened, but I'll just remove that statement for now.--IDVtalk 01:28, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
I have completed my review of the article and have now determined that it fits to Good Article criteria and will now be promoted to Good Article status. If you do not agree with this decision, you can take it to GAR for reassessment. Thank you IDV for your patience on this review. GamerPro64 01:58, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

No problem. Thank you for the review!--IDVtalk 02:05, 6 December 2015 (UTC)