# Talk:Krohn Air

This review is transcluded from Talk:Krohn Air/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk · contribs) 03:38, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.
Disambiguations: none found.
Linkrot: none found. Jezhotwells (talk) 03:39, 4 December 2011 (UTC)


### Checking against GA criteria
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose):  b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): 
The article is reasonably well written and complies sufficiently with the MoS, I made a few minor copy-edits.[1]
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 
References look good, RS. Statements adequately sourced as far as I can tell with FoxLingo translate, no OR
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 
Sufficient detail
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 
NPOV
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 
Stable
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 
THe logo has a suitable non-free use rationale
Overall:
Pass/Fail: 
Good to go, happy to list. Congratulations! Jezhotwells (talk) 03:58, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

The article is partially updated for facts and tense, but the article now has a bare URL. Geschichte (talk) 19:53, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

I have formatted the bare url into a proper ref using the cite news template. Finnusertop (talk | guestbook | contribs) 21:49, 27 August 2014 (UTC)