# Talk:Church of St George, Kyustendil

This review is transcluded from Talk:Church of St George, Kyustendil/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 21:29, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.
Disambiguations: none found
Linkrot: none found. Jezhotwells (talk) 21:30, 23 January 2011 (UTC)


### Checking against GA criteria
GA review (see here for criteria)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose):  b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): 
I made a number of minor copy-edits.[1]
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 
I assume good faith for the sources as I have no knowledge of Bulgarian.
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 
I think this covers sufficient detail, given the difficulties in sourcing
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 

It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 
Licencensed and captioned.
Overall:
Pass/Fail: 
Short but sweet, I am satisfied that this meets the GA criteria and so I shall list it. Congratulations. Jezhotwells (talk) 21:42, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Church of St George, Kyustendil. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/5vr6C7ILi?url=http://mc.government.bg/images/NPK/KUSTENDIL.pdf to http://mc.government.bg/images/NPK/KUSTENDIL.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:43, 7 August 2017 (UTC)