# Talk:HMS Tabard (P342)

This review is transcluded from Talk:HMS Tabard (P342)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: User:Canpark 10:17, 3 August 2011
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality: 

B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists: 

Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources: 

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary: 
An excellent use of a combination of print and online sources.
C. No original research: 

Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects: 
The historical information of the submarine are well covered, very interesting.
B. Focused: 

Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias: 

Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc: 
There are no edit wars.
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales: 

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions: 

Overall:
Pass or Fail: 
Because I knew absolutely nothing about this topic, I appreciate the detailed information of the HMS Tabard provided in the article. The editor used a simple lay out in line with MoS guidelines, which made it easy to read. I will pass this article.