# Talk:Hurricane Lorenzo (2007)

It appears that the track map has been made with 3-hour updates instead of 6-hour. This disenfranchises the actual speed of its intensification, as normal maps are made with 6-hour updates. 72.205.60.115 22:06, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

Nope it uses only the data from the TCR, which is 6-hourly. --Ajm81 22:02, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Hurricane Lorenzo (2007)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Titoxd(?!? - cool stuff) 05:57, 29 May 2011 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose):  b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): 

… it formed in the Bay of Campeche off the east coast of Mexico from a tropical wave. — "east coast" here is imprecise, since it could mean the Caribbean. If anything, mention that the BoC is in the Gulf of Mexico.
… Lorenzo intensified from a 35 mph (55 km/h) tropical depression to an 80 mph (130 km/h) hurricane. — Both of these numbers should be hyphenated.
 Overall there were six deaths in the country, five in Puebla and of which three were a family that perished in a landslide. — confusing sentence structure, please rephrase. Also, mention where the other death was located for completeness.
… it traversed much of the Caribbean Sea before developing an area thunderstorms on September 21. — fix
… Initially a Hurricane Hunters flight was scheduled to investigate the system — add comma after "initially"
… In its formative stages, the depression executed a small cyclonic loop.[1] — "cyclonic" is excessive jargon in this case.
Primarily affected along the coast were small fishing villages, — awkward passive voice

It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 

It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 

The impact section is too small. See es:Huracán Lorenzo (2007) for more detail that could easily be added to the article.
Is an aftermath section needed in this case?
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 

It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 

Overall:
Pass/Fail: 

See the points above. Titoxd(?!? - cool stuff) 05:57, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
Alright, I got the grammary stuff. Some of it I just changed around the wording (so it wasn't exactly your suggestion). As for the Spanish article, I think I got the majority of the good stuff out of it. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk)  20:37, 29 May 2011 (UTC)

The modifications are satisfactory.  Passed. Titoxd(?!? - cool stuff) 06:50, 30 May 2011 (UTC)

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Hurricane Lorenzo (2007)/CommentsTalk:Hurricane Lorenzo (2007)/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
Last edited at 16:51, 19 November 2008 (UTC).
Substituted at 18:32, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Hurricane Lorenzo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110722223613/http://www.elmanana.com.mx/notas.asp?id=19035 to http://www.elmanana.com.mx/notas.asp?id=19035
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:44, 6 April 2017 (UTC)