# Talk:French battleship Vergniaud

This review is transcluded from Talk:French battleship Vergniaud/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Rp0211 (talk · contribs) 05:26, 15 July 2012 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose):  b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): 
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 
Overall:
Pass/Fail: 


### Infobox
No issues


### Lead
No issues


### Design and description
No issues


### Career
Fix disambiguation issue with "naval review" according to this
The definition's on the disambig page, about halfway down. Thanks for the review.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 19:41, 15 July 2012 (UTC)


### Legacy
Since there is only one sentence in this section, I would get rid of this section and put the information in the "Postwar career" subsection
Done.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 19:43, 15 July 2012 (UTC)


### Notes
No issues


### Bibliography
No issues

After thoroughly reviewing this article, I have decided to put it on hold at this time. I will give you the general seven days to fix these mistakes and/or address issues which you believe do not affect good article status. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask. Rp0211 (talk2me) 19:31, 15 July 2012 (UTC)

Since all issues have been addressed, I feel confident passing this article. Congratulations and keep up the good work! Rp0211 (talk2me) 00:10, 16 July 2012 (UTC)