# Talk:Gengoroh Tagame

For Malkinann !
<ref name="Dicomanga">{{cite book | first= Christian| last=Marmonnier |page=524| editor=Nicolas Finet | title=Dicomanga: le dictionnaire encyclopédique de la bande dessinée japonaise | publisher=Fleurus | language=French | location=Paris | isbn=978-2-215-07931-6 | year=2008}}</ref>
This translation should be removed after use due to Copyvio issue and is only here to help editor to add verifiable elements in the biography using the reference at the top. --KrebMarkt 10:46, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

Perhaps it's not an appropriate fact for the lead, but it still needs to be cleaned up.  It's floating in dead space where it's currently located in the article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.102.110.129 (talk) 03:16, 30 April 2012 (UTC) 

His sexuality is a central theme throughout his work, so it's an appropriate fact to highlight in the lede. -Jason A. Quest (talk) 11:58, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Gengoroh Tagame. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070814025620/http://www.glbtq.com:80/arts/japan_art,2.html to http://www.glbtq.com/arts/japan_art,2.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:57, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Gengoroh Tagame. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.glbtq.com/arts/japan_art,2.html
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.ho-editions.com/caddie/ficheAuteur.php?IDA=73&UID=20090628043115210.49.28.131
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120723153338/http://www.pictureboxinc.com/blogs/pbox-world/2012/07/14/the-passion-of-gengoroh-tagame/ to http://www.pictureboxinc.com/blogs/pbox-world/2012/07/14/the-passion-of-gengoroh-tagame/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:59, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Gengoroh Tagame/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Link20XX (talk · contribs) 18:41, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
Hey I will be reviewing this article. Review will be soon. Link20XX (talk) 18:42, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
@Morgan695: I have completed my initial review. Great job overall, just a few things needed before it can be promoted. 


#### Checklist:
Is it well written?

A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct: 

B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation: 

Is it verifiable with no original research?
A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline: 

B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines: 
C. It contains no original research: 

D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism: 

Is it broad in its coverage?
A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic: 
B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style): 

Is it neutral?
It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each: 
Is it stable?
It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute: 

Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content: 

B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions: 

Overall:
Pass or Fail: 


#### Comments:
In the second paragraph of Themes and Motifs, link the article for the word "pejorative", as I doubt most English speakers know what it means.
The link for source 3 doesn't appear to work, you may need to get the archive link.
Optional, but it may be a good idea to replace ’ with '.
That is it. Address each mandatory issue and I will promote it. Link20XX (talk) 02:32, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

@Link20XX: Both mandatory issues have been resolved. Morgan695 (talk) 03:16, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
@Morgan695: The changes resolved both issues. The result of this review is Pass. Congratulations! Link20XX (talk) 03:39, 5 March 2021 (UTC)