# Talk:Cyclone Graham

This review is transcluded from Talk:Cyclone Graham/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Hi!  I will be reviewing this article for GA status, and should have the full review up within a couple of hours. Dana boomer (talk) 17:05, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose):  b (MoS): 

It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 
All references need publisher information.
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 

It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars etc.: 

It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 

Overall:
Pass/Fail: 

Just one issue with the references that needs to be addressed before the article is promoted to GA status, so I am putting the article on hold to allow time to deal with this concern.  Drop me a note if you have any questions. Dana boomer (talk) 18:08, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

Done. The references in question had the publisher as their author, so I switched it around. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 18:40, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
Everything looks good, so I'm passing the article. Dana boomer (talk) 18:46, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
Thanks (my third GA today!) :-) –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 18:50, 12 September 2008 (UTC)