# Talk:Marjorie Taylor Greene

The only reason I know her is for her position on Israel, including bring a bill against Israel. Yet it did not make the lead! Explain it in baby English.  Inayity (talk) 09:33, 3 September 2025 (UTC)

THis is a recent issue, and not the reason she was elected. Nor is it even close to being what she is most notable for. Slatersteven (talk) 09:36, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
two months later, I'd say her very public break with republicans on a number of issues should probably be mentioned — jonas (talk) 12:53, 5 November 2025 (UTC)

Requested minor edit to add [[National divorce]] to #Secession. Previously National divorce redirected here, but now it redirects to Secession in the United States#National divorce. Evel Prior (talk) 09:31, 15 September 2025 (UTC)

Seems to me that is what it is under a different name. Slatersteven (talk) 10:10, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
Done. -- Pemilligan (talk) 03:20, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

The "Healthcare" subsection appears to be incorrectly located above the subsubsections on "Russia and Ukraine" and "Israel and Palestine" in her Political Positions section, it should be relocated to below them.
Jeremy Beatson (Talk) 09:57, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

How is it incorrect? Slatersteven (talk) 10:10, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
A person's political positions on Russia and Ukraine and Israel and Palestine are not components of their positions on Healthcare. Ergo, those subsections should be moved to fit under her Foreign Policy positions. Jeremy Beatson (Talk) 02:34, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
Done. -- Pemilligan (talk) 03:16, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

I saw a Marjorie Taylor Greene video interview and she stated that the proposed extension of Obamacare subsidies would affect her children, thus not supporting the extension of Obamacare subsidies would alienate her from her children. I cannot find the video online. The clip was in a commentary video from a WP:RS

"In October 2025, Greene broke with her party over the federal government shutdown. The disagreement was over a proposed extension of Obamacare subsidies."

Piñanana (talk) 22:58, 20 October 2025 (UTC)

Why are the Epstein files not mentioned once in the article, when Greene has been very public and breaking with her own party over wanting to force a vote to release them? — jonas (talk) 12:54, 5 November 2025 (UTC)

Because untill it actually has some kind of effect (as in she resigns or votes against her own party over it) it tells us nothing. Slatersteven (talk) 13:00, 5 November 2025 (UTC)
Jonas that moment has arrived.--FeralOink (talk) 03:49, 22 November 2025 (UTC)
Yes clearly the Epstein files need to be mentioned in this article. – Muboshgu (talk) 03:52, 22 November 2025 (UTC)
Has it, when she actialy resigns, yes it will have had an effect. Slatersteven (talk) 10:20, 22 November 2025 (UTC)

Especially in the wake of the recent conflict with Donald Trump, I think it would be worth adding that she is a far-right populist politican. Here are some sources that describe her has both populist and far-right [3], [4], [5]. Esolo5002 (talk) 18:34, 15 November 2025 (UTC)

 Done. Thanks for providing those reliable sources! Qwerty123M (talk) 01:58, 16 November 2025 (UTC)

I cannot help but notice on Wikipedia we like to place descriptors like "far-right" into certain politician's infoboxes. I've never seen a left-wing politician be called "left-wing," much less "far-left" in their infobox. All these terms are vague by nature and kinda unhelpful, and when we only apply them to people on the right in creates a sort of othering that is not in the spirit of NPOV.  R. G. Checkers talk 06:49, 17 November 2025 (UTC)

Yes, you are correct. I have found that efforts to remedy are widely resisted by Wikipedia editors.--FeralOink (talk) 03:50, 22 November 2025 (UTC)

The overcites about her being a conspiracy theorist and far-right are excessive. I'm not suggesting those descriptions are untrue, merely that (given the article size of OVER 370,000 bytes when 100,000 is considered large!) that these should be trimmed back. 
As for the extremist description, I do wonder if there is any other (now former) member of Congress who is described by Wikipedia using that adjective? If not, is Wikipedia claiming that MTG is the MOST or even the ONLY member of Congress who is "extremist"? --FeralOink (talk) 03:57, 22 November 2025 (UTC)