# Talk:Hurricane Otis (2005)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Hurricane Otis (2005)/GA2. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Lord Roem (talk) 02:07, 3 March 2011 (UTC)


#### Comments
Lead

Not sure on the convention on this, but note the year in the lead??
Wikilink tropical storm
Done indirectly, by linking tropical cyclone to "hurricane" ("tropical storm" would be linked to the same page).
Expand the lead to at least two paragraphs. See WP:LEAD.
Not needed. The article is relatively brief, so it can be summarized adequately in the one paragraph that is there right now. If there's any specific facts or details you'd like to see added, let me know, but otherwise I don't see the need to add text for the sake of adding text. Juliancolton (talk) 21:04, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
History

"By late on September 28..." should be "By late September 28...."
Preparations and mpx

I think you can omit the two specific ships which reported high winds.
This is a valid observation, so I'd prefer to leave it in. Juliancolton (talk) 21:04, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
Other

Links to several redirect/disambugation pages:
Agua Blanca
Comondu (redirect page)
Miraflores
Concluding Thoughts

Good writing. Certainly viable for promotion. Regards, Lord Roem (talk) 02:13, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for the review. I've left a few comments above, but otherwise I've addressed most of your concerns. Juliancolton (talk) 21:04, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
Great! Moving to promote now! Lord Roem (talk) 20:11, 6 March 2011 (UTC)

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Hurricane Otis (2005)/CommentsTalk:Hurricane Otis (2005)/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
Last edited at 01:54, 16 April 2010 (UTC).
Substituted at 18:32, 29 April 2016 (UTC)