# Talk:Gloucester Road tube station

I have a distant memory (I'm not a Londoner) of an automated Tube announcement - possibly a female one - saying "Glozeder Road".  I've heard others say the perfectly ordinary "Glosster" since.  Am I imagining that other pronunciation? 87.113.29.245 15:19, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

Quite possibly. There are several tube pronunciations in dispute, such as Marry-le-bone / Marr-le-bone and Saint James Park / Saint James-es Park, which is disputed in both spelling and pronunciation.
My query is why this station is no longer represented as a junction on the tube map. Although it is quite clearly a junction - the Piccadilly line's route is quite separate from the Circle/District one, and has a completely separate pair of platforms, tube rather than sub-surface - recent tube maps have taken to representing it as a non-junction. I see no sense in this. BartBassist (talk) 22:39, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

The white circles don't mean "junction", they mean "recommended interchange". It's not shown as an interchange because due to the distance between the platforms, there's no journey for which it's the most convenient interchange, and it gets very crowded so LT want to discourage people from changing there. This is standard LT practice when they want to discourage people from using a station as an interchange; see the Bakerloo north of Queen's Park or the Piccadilly west of Rayners Lane, where they're trying to encourage people not to change until they get to more frequently served stations, or the fact that Rickmansworth isn't marked as a BR interchange despite being served by BR trains. – iridescent 10:07, 16 May 2010 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Gloucester Road tube station. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100820195909/http://www.tfl.gov.uk/assets/downloads/central-london-bus-map.pdf to http://www.tfl.gov.uk/assets/downloads/central-london-bus-map.pdf
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100728062229/http://www.tfl.gov.uk/assets/downloads/Central-london-night-bus-map.pdf to http://www.tfl.gov.uk/assets/downloads/Central-london-night-bus-map.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:26, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Gloucester Road tube station. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100327194058/http://www.cravendunnill-jackfield.co.uk/london_ug.html to http://www.cravendunnill-jackfield.co.uk/london_ug.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:08, 10 December 2017 (UTC)