# Talk:Dolph Ziggler

Dolph uses the rko Matt3535 (talk) 23:25, 26 November 2017 (UTC)

can someone get an updated photo of nick and if i can i will try to get a photo of him when smackdown comes to australia.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dolphzigglerrules (talk • contribs) 15:50, 30 July 2010 (UTC) 

Perhaps we shouldn't list Ziggler as Intercontinental Champion until the episode he is supposedly booked to win happens? Plus we don't know if he's meant to win or not. I'd suggest removing information about his supposed IC title reign unless it actually occurs. --Evil Yugi (talk) 05:16, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
It has occurred. The episode in question has been taped, it just hasn't aired. Not having aired is not the same thing as not having happened. ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 07:47, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
I see. My bad. --Evil Yugi (talk) 21:06, 7 August 2010 (UTC)

I heard Nemeth and WWE Diva Nikki Bella are going out and does anyone think we should add it to the page???  —Preceding unsigned comment added by User:dolphzigglerrules (talk) 01:30, 19 September 2010 (UTC) 

Not unless you can find a reliable source to verify the claim. And even then dating someone is often just trivia. People date a lot of people. Active Banana   ( bananaphone 01:39, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
I have checked many websites and photos and they all say they are dating  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dolphzigglerrules (talk • contribs) 05:31, 19 September 2010 (UTC) 

The portion about his amateur career is a bit incorrect. Kent State has never won a Division I national wrestling championship. While Nemeth was at St. Edwards, the high school team won two national championships, but not Kent State.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.231.203.23 (talk) 04:41, 30 October 2010 (UTC) 

On the March 7 edition of Raw, Dolph Ziggler was rehired and signed to Raw. And defeated John Morrison.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tbone819 (talk • contribs) 04:02, 8 March 2011 (UTC) 
I created a new section "Move to Raw" for Ziggler because Ziggler's move to Raw has ended his storyline feud with Edge over the World Heavyweight Championship. The previous section was "World Heavyweight Champion" and thus was inappropriate for his current stint on Raw. Ziggler has also had new feuds with John Morrison and Snooki, and a new look, so I reflected that in that section. Starship.paint (talk) 12:02, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

Previously Ziggler had both the Jumping Russian Legsweep and the Zig Zag (Reverse bulldog) listed as two of his finishers. Upon watching the video for the match where Ziggler supposedly used the Jumping Russian Legsweep, I realised that it was really a Zig Zag, the two descriptions were of the exact same move so I have removed the finisher of jumping russian legsweep. Starship.paint (talk) 12:05, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

So you removed information that was referenced to a reliable source, based on your own opinion? No, not happening. I've restored it. Please don't do that again. NiciVampireHeart 14:37, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
Yes, I removed info from a reliable source. But clearly, one of the reliable sources is WRONG. I watched the videos, the Reverse Bulldog and the Jumping Russian Legsweep both refer to the Zig-Zag, do you understand what I am saying to you right now? They refer to the same move so clearly, one of the  descriptions is wrong and has to be removed, as two descriptions for one move is redundant! One of your reliable sources is wrong. Did you not read my message? Don't be so stubborn and intent on following the rules please, because this newbie finds it extremely frustrating. 
Not to mention you removed my edits to Ziggler's current time inRaw which I referenced with RELIABLE sources. It is your job, as the reverter, to make sure you don't remove any good edits I made no matter if I made any bad edits. To just remove ALL of my edits without checking whether they are bad or good just because you thought one of them was bad just makes me feel that my contributions to this site are unvalued. I advise you to revise your conduct to be a little more flexible. I notice you revert a lot of other people's edits. Perhaps they were unsourced, but maybe you could put in some efforts to search for the sources yourself so that you don't waste people's time and good intentions by simply reverting edits.  Starship.paint (talk) 23:20, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

I checked all of your edits. Then I reverted. Just because you source something doesn't mean it's notable enough to be included. What exactly did WM add to his overall career? And why do you feel that every new paragraph needs a new subsection – because, hint, hint, it really doesn't. By the way, as a heads up, you'll probably be already to tell this from your talk page, but if you don't stop removing sourced infotmation because in your opinion it's wrong, you will find yourself on the wrong end of a vacation from wikipedia. NiciVampireHeart 15:52, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
1. In my opinion, any Wrestlemania appearance deserves mention, purely because said wrestler is making an appearance on the Biggest Stage of Them All, it is an landmark achievement to be wrestling on Wrestlemania.
2. I have no idea what you are saying about every paragraph needing a new subsection. I don't feel that way.
3. You didn't see that I made (or didn't explain why you saw fit to remove)  other edits to shift all mentions of Ziggler defending the IC title and losing it to the above paragraph because it was about Ziggler being the IC Champion. Those mentions should not be in the WHC section.
Starship.paint (talk) 08:00, 20 May 2011 (UTC)

I found a photo of Ziggler as World Heavyweight Champion that I would like to add. http://prorasslin.files.wordpress.com/2011/02/ziggler-champ.jpg?w=270&h=378
However I am a new user and I don't know about copyright policy. Does this photo have copyright? How can I know?  Starship.paint (talk) 12:17, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

General rule of thumb: every image on the internet is copyrighted, unless it explicitly says otherwise. In order to upload a random file from the internet to wikipedia, you will need to provide a link proving that it is not copyrighted. NiciVampireHeart 14:35, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
OK Thank you. 
Starship.paint (talk) 11:31, 19 May 2011 (UTC)

Look at Ziggler's finishing moves. It lists: 
1. Jumping Russian Legsweep
2. Zig Zag (Reverse Bulldog)
Jumping Russian Legsweep's reference, wrestleview, which is considered "a reliable source" is "http://www.wrestleview.com/news2009/1247952511.php" which is a broken link. The real link should be "http://www.wrestleview.com/viewnews.php?id=1247952511" 
It refers to the results of the  7/17/09 show, where Ziggler, with Jericho faced Jeff Hardy and Rey Mysterio. I found the match at "http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a1UG1XQGARQ" At 4:19 to 4:29 in the video, Ziggler performs the Jumping Russian Legsweep, which is the Zig Zag, really.
Reverse Bulldog's refernce, PW Torch, is also considered a reliable source. The link is to "http://www.pwtorch.com/artman2/publish/TV_Reports_9/article_35422.shtml" Jericho faced Finlay. I found the match at " removed YouTube link which violates WP:LINKVIO. NiciVampireHeart 16:43, 19 May 2011 (UTC) " Ziggler performs the Reverse Bulldog at 44:00-44:10. If you watch the videos, (take my word for it though), they are EXACTLY THE SAME MOVE, which Ziggler calls the Zig Zag. 
So, one of these reliable sources is wrong, as the Zig Zag cannot be both a jumping russian legsweep and a reverse bulldog. One move should not have two different descriptions. People are human and make mistakes. Sometimes even authors of reliable websites may call a move wrongly. I believe the Wrestleview source, "reliable" as it may be, is wrong. 
The Zig Zag was called as a Jumping russian LEGSWEEP. From wikipedia itself, it involves then while hooking the opponent's leg the wrestler falls backward, pulling the opponent to the mat back-first. If you watch the two videos of Ziggler above, you notice Ziggler never touches the opponent's leg. Thus, he can't be performing a Jumping Legsweep.'
Whereas, from wikipedia the Reverse Bulldog is Standing next to an opponent, the attacking wrestler grabs the side of the opponent's head and leaps backwards, resulting in both individuals landing supine
 Definitely more appropriate for the Zig Zag if you watch the videos.
Thus, due to this, I deem the Jumping Russian Legsweep, which describes the Zig-Zag, irrelevant as the Reverse Bulldog is more appropriate. I will be removing the Jumping Russian Legsweep from Ziggler's finishing moves, despite the "reliable" source. I ask that if you wish to revert my edit, that you read through this post again and watch the videos to convince yourself, because ONE of the RELIABLE sources is clearly wrong.  Starship.paint (talk) 12:14, 19 May 2011 (UTC)

I apologise for editing your comment above, but please read and WP:LINKVIO and refrain from linking to known copyright violations, i.e. youtube videos whose uploaders obviously do not own the rights to the footage they uploaded.
All the bolding and ALLCAPS above does not detract from the point that this is based on your own opinion. The reliable sources state different – we use the sources, not your opinons. NiciVampireHeart 16:41, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
I want to make this very clear to you. Please read carefully. I want you to answer all my questions. They are simple Yes/No questions.

1. Should a single move (Zig-Zag) should have two technical descriptions, such as a) Jumping Russian Legsweep and b) Reverse Bulldog?
2. Do you agree that both the Jumping Russian Legsweep and Reverse Bulldog are the technical descriptions of the move Zig-Zag? (you'll need to consult video evidence)
3. Doesn't the existence of two technical descriptions for a single move contradict each other, despite both technical descriptions coming from "reliable" sources?
4. Since one of the descriptions is wrong, should we remove one of them so only one description remains?
Starship.paint (talk) 08:08, 20 May 2011 (UTC)

Well, sure, I'll play along. I've done you one better than your "simple Yes/No questions" (again, and like your comments on my talk page, very patronising, not to mention stifling discussion by insisting I respond to four questions in a total of four words), and provided reasons why I gave a "simple Yes/No" answer. Let me know if you feel this is to complex for the scope or remit of this discussion.
No. Reason: Only the Reverse bulldog is sourced as being the Zig-Zag.
No. Reason: The move 'Jumping Russian Legsweep' is not called the 'Zig-Zag' in the source.
No. Reason: There is no "two technical descriptions for a single move". Source 1 [1] – quote: "Ziggler then hits his finisher, a Jumping Russian Leg Sweep". Lookie, no mention of the Zig-Zag. Source 2: [2] quote: "Ziggler then nailed his Zig-Zag reverse bulldog". So the Zig-Zag is a reverse bulldog. Hey – that's what the article says now, and what it said before you started this section. Ergo based on the sources, and try to follow here, the Jumping Russian Legsweep is a complete, different, and distinct finisher to the Zig-Zag.
No. Reason: See above reasons, but I'll summarise here to <quoting you>make this very clear to you</quoting you>: The Jumping Russian Legsweep is not called the Zig-Zag, only the reverse bulldog is.
Thanks for the interrogation.
Have a nice day.
NiciVampireHeart 14:16, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
I meant not to be patronising at all. I have no problem with you providing your reasons, rather than a simple Yes/No. Please, stop assuming that I am adopting a patronising attitude. Now, I'm not sure if my early comments I came off as patronising, but rest assured all my recent comments from posting on your wall onwards have been in good faith.
Now, all your answers are No, whereas all my answers are Yes. So the key difference between us, is that you do not think that the Jumping Russian Legsweep is a Zig-Zag. As I said, if you watch the videos, Ziggler did the exact same move both times. I believe at that time, Ziggler hadn't named his finisher yet, but he didn't change it. I found that reference 51 Smackdown: re-writing a good showhttp://slam.canoe.ca/Slam/Wrestling/2009/05/16/9476311.html also describes Ziggler performing a reverse bulldog. That was in May 2009. The Wrestleview reference is in July 2009. Ziggler was not reported to change his finisher at that time. As of now, I have only video evidence that he executed the same move. I'm not sure why you can't conclude from the video evidence that what Ziggler did was exactly the same? Starship.paint (talk) 15:53, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
I've been trying to get this change established for a long time now.  There has never been a single source that contradicts these claims and states these are different moves, while footage of the matches and unestablished sources clearly suggest they're the same move.  Because there is no reliable source that has ever stated these are different moves, so I don't see why editors here won't have an open dialogue and just revert edits they don't agree with.  While there is no reliable source that has gone out and listed every possible description for the Zig Zag, there is no reliable citation that warrants listing all of these different moves.  I think it would greatly benefit the article if editors looked at the footage and used their own reasoning.  This strict refusal to use our own brains is detrimental to the article when Wikipedia acknowledges we can bend the rules if it will help the article.  -WikiFew (talk) 04:41, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

Jim Ross always mention what position the wrestlers were after they won their secondtier championship like Shelton was the 23rd to win both championships so what is Dolph's position?
AnthonyTheGamer (talk) 22:12, 20 June 2011 (UTC) AnthonyTheGamer

I don't think that's important enough to be included, actually. Does it matter whether he's 22nd or 25th? Starship.paint (talk) 00:55, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

Should the article mention that Gray Maynard and Andy Hrovat were on his high school wrestling team and that they were all part of the same graduating class? It is impressive that Nemeth holds a school record for most pins when he was teammates with Maynard, who would become very successful in the UFC, and with Hrovat who competed in the Olympics. Grammarian10 (talk) 01:55, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

I am okay with this mention. Something along the lines of "Nemeth was teammates with GM and AH, who would go on to compete in the UFC and at the Olympics respectively". I suppose do you have a source to back you up? Starship.paint (talk) 00:55, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

My edit concerning his entrance theme section was reverted because it lacked sources. This would have been fine except any source I could have found would have been youtube videos of the dates in question, videos that would have been against the rules to use as sources since they were copyright violations. On top of that, the sources for the themes deemed acceptable are simply links to where you can buy them online. So is this information that is just not allowed to exist on the page because the sources wouldn't be allowed, regardless of how accurate they were?
Max Nardi (talk) 05:03, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

Ziggler's been playing with the move name for awhile on Twitter and it looks like they've decided (via Scott Stanford on last week's Superstars) to start calling his Rocker Dropper (leg drop bulldog) the "Name Dropper." I haven't edited in a long long time, but I provided a reliable source since I know the episode in question on Youtube doesn't count. If the change was made too soon, I understand. :P --Miikro (talk) 08:52, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

Sure, Nick Nemeth has been World, IC and Tag Champion, but WWE does not recognize Dolph Ziggler and Nicky Spirit Squad as the same wrestler [3]. Since the Triple Crown is a kayfabe recognition introduced by WWE, Ziggler should not be listed as one, since he has never been a Tag Team Champion as per WWE storylines (also in WWE link given). I'm not suggesting that any titles be removed from his accomplishments, but the Triple Crown accolade should. Mr Neese (talk) 16:17, 30 March 2012 (UTC)

Rather than delete this detail, I have instead noted that it is unrecognized by WWE. Mr Neese (talk) 16:29, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
Dolph suckes Matt3535 (talk) 23:25, 26 November 2017 (UTC)

Amy Schumer went on the Howard Stern show and talked a lot about her relationship with Dolph Ziggler.
I heard it myself live and here are several reliable sources:
http://www.ibtimes.com/articles/376444/20120822/amy-schumer-dolph-ziggler-wwe-sex-athlete.htm
http://www.ibtimes.com/articles/376444/20120822/amy-schumer-dolph-ziggler-wwe-sex-athlete.htm
http://www.howardstern.com/rundown.hs?d=1345780800
Kire1975 (talk) 02:03, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

Hello, Actually Dolph Ziggler was ranked 6th in 2011 and not 2012 from what i saw on the Pro Wrestling Illustrated Wikipedia page, Can it be verified and corrected ? And for the name Nick Metro Could it be verified as well and it's not some mistaken edit, Thank you.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.50.221.142 (talk) 06:02, 10 April 2013 (UTC) 

The name Nick Metro is false, He was never ever called by that name or used it during his whole career, Internet Wrestling Database and the WWE Profile itself is proof by itself that the name Nick Metro is false and not associated with Dolph Ziggler or even used.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by LaRoux4Life (talk • contribs) 13:26, 4 May 2013 (UTC)

To update or at least upload Ziggler holding the World Title Hitmonchan (talk) 21:13, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

PWI ranked him #6 of the top 500 singles wrestlers in the PWI 500 in 2012 That information is WRONG !!! He was ranked 16th and not 6th !  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.50.221.142 (talk) 18:20, 3 May 2013 (UTC) 

As i said before, He was ranked 16th and not 6th in the PWI 500 2012, And here's the PWI 500 for 2012 http://www.pwmania.com/complete-pro-wrestling-illustrated-top-500-wrestlers-list-for-2012#.UYTrMuSQZVY

With the massive number of popups that arise when I click that link (I don't recommend anyone follow it), I'd have trouble considering it to be a reliable source.  Before trying to use that as a valid source, I would discuss it at the reliable source noticeboard.  If their determination is that it is valid, then you can use the edit-semiprotected template (✉→BWilkins←✎) 12:20, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
Another source, http://www.profightdb.com/pwi-500/2012.html  — Preceding unsigned comment added by LaRoux4Life (talk • contribs) 13:18, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
And the PWI 500 mistake is still the same with no one correcting it, Really pathetic and idiotic.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by LaRoux4Life (talk • contribs) 12:09, 10 May 2013 (UTC) 

It is missing the Spirit Squad theme song, which he used as “Nicky”, as well as his first theme as Dolph Ziggler, called “Time To Shout”. Fix this. 216.157.195.66 (talk) 21:40, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

"Nemeth was previously in relationships with former WWE Diva Nikki Bella..." 
Nikki Bella is again an employee of WWE so 'former' should be removed.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.240.44.36 (talk) 01:07, 15 June 2013 (UTC) 

 Done STATic message me! 01:44, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
love him  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:2459:9120:C926:B13:A589:BC43 (talk) 17:20, 15 February 2015 (UTC) 

OK. That whole Kentucky Fried Chicken thing with The Miz was just a joke segment, but should it be added as a ring name?PeterMan844 (talk) 14:17, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 10 external links on Dolph Ziggler. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111007235047/http://alumni.sehs.net/resource/resmgr/wrestling/state_qualifiers.pdf to http://alumni.sehs.net/resource/resmgr/wrestling/state_qualifiers.pdf
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.miamiherald.com/2010/09/30/1849718_p2/wwe-superstar-dolph-ziggler-prepares.html
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080329062858/http://www.wwe.com/inside/titlehistory/worldtagteam/2448432 to http://www.wwe.com/inside/titlehistory/worldtagteam/2448432
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100722064759/http://www.wrestleview.com:80/viewnews.php?id=1279507940 to http://www.wrestleview.com/viewnews.php?id=1279507940
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.wwe.com/shows/royalrumble/2013/royal-rumble-match-26080784/page-5
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101005005143/http://www.wrestleview.com:80/viewnews.php?id=1285953509 to http://www.wrestleview.com/viewnews.php?id=1285953509
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120314034439/http://www.wrestleview.com:80/viewnews.php?id=1331601265 to http://www.wrestleview.com/viewnews.php?id=1331601265
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100819051349/http://www.wwe.com:80/inside/titlehistory/intercontinental/15294126 to http://www.wwe.com/inside/titlehistory/intercontinental/15294126
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140819090020/http://www.wwe.com/classics/titlehistory/intercontinental/20140817-dolph-ziggler to http://www.wwe.com/classics/titlehistory/intercontinental/20140817-dolph-ziggler
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141226021446/http://www.wwe.com/classics/titlehistory/intercontinental/20141214-dolph-ziggler to http://www.wwe.com/classics/titlehistory/intercontinental/20141214-dolph-ziggler
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:05, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Dolph Ziggler. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111218195433/http://www.wrestleview.com:80/viewnews.php?id=1319425229 to http://www.wrestleview.com/viewnews.php?id=1319425229
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:15, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 11 external links on Dolph Ziggler. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100621043310/http://www.wrestleview.com/viewnews.php?id=1276964327 to http://www.wrestleview.com/viewnews.php?id=1276964327
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.wrestleview.com/viewnews.php?id=1279507940
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110902072349/http://www.wwe.com/shows/capitolpunishment/2011/kingston-ziggler to http://www.wwe.com/shows/capitolpunishment/2011/kingston-ziggler
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.wrestleview.com/viewnews.php?id=1285953509
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101107033523/http://www.wrestleview.com/viewnews.php?id=1289009418 to http://www.wrestleview.com/viewnews.php?id=1289009418
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121101172933/http://www.wrestleview.com/viewnews.php?id=1349492313 to http://www.wrestleview.com/viewnews.php?id=1349492313
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.wrestleview.com/viewnews.php?id=1319425229
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100422015426/http://www.wrestleview.com/viewnews.php?id=1271547550 to http://www.wrestleview.com/viewnews.php?id=1271547550
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151001021800/http://www.wwe.com/inside/wwe-body-shop-pain-and-gain-26138579/page-1 to http://www.wwe.com/inside/wwe-body-shop-pain-and-gain-26138579/page-1
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.wrestleview.com/viewnews.php?id=1331601265
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.wwe.com/inside/titlehistory/intercontinental/15294126
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:32, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 14 external links on Dolph Ziggler. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100714023839/http://www.wrestleview.com/viewnews.php?id=1278780187 to http://www.wrestleview.com/viewnews.php?id=1278780187
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100819040551/http://www.wrestleview.com/viewnews.php?id=1281918110 to http://www.wrestleview.com/viewnews.php?id=1281918110
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150717015357/http://whatculture.com/wwe/dolph-ziggler-out-of-action-due-to-filming-wwe-movie.php to http://whatculture.com/wwe/dolph-ziggler-out-of-action-due-to-filming-wwe-movie.php
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.wrestleview.com/viewnews.php?id=1281408602
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110226085213/http://www.wrestleview.com/viewnews.php?id=1298386609 to http://www.wrestleview.com/viewnews.php?id=1298386609
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121001161405/http://www.wrestleview.com/viewnews.php?id=1248663464 to http://www.wrestleview.com/viewnews.php?id=1248663464
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100605192544/http://www.wrestleview.com/viewnews.php?id=1275631665 to http://www.wrestleview.com/viewnews.php?id=1275631665
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100710170924/http://www.wrestleview.com/viewnews.php?id=1273332525 to http://www.wrestleview.com/viewnews.php?id=1273332525
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121002034232/http://www.wrestleview.com/viewnews.php?id=1292905434 to http://www.wrestleview.com/viewnews.php?id=1292905434
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101224062157/http://www.wrestleview.com/viewnews.php?id=1292905434 to http://www.wrestleview.com/viewnews.php?id=1292905434
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131115103335/http://repertoire.bmi.com/title.asp?blnWriter=True&blnPublisher=True&blnArtist=True&page=1&keyid=8286788&ShowNbr=0&ShowSeqNbr=0&querytype=WorkID to http://repertoire.bmi.com/title.asp?blnWriter=True&blnPublisher=True&blnArtist=True&page=1&keyid=8286788&ShowNbr=0&ShowSeqNbr=0&querytype=WorkID
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120516003447/http://www.wwe.com/classics/titlehistory/worldheavyweight/201012192 to http://www.wwe.com/classics/titlehistory/worldheavyweight/201012192
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130412053609/http://www.wwe.com/classics/titlehistory/worldheavyweight/20140408-dolph-ziggler to http://www.wwe.com/classics/titlehistory/worldheavyweight/20140408-dolph-ziggler
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120603010051/http://www.wwe.com/classics/titlehistory/unitedstates/25021559 to http://www.wwe.com/classics/titlehistory/unitedstates/25021559
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141016021722/http://www.wwe.com/classics/titlehistory/intercontinental/20140922-dolph-ziggler to http://www.wwe.com/classics/titlehistory/intercontinental/20140922-dolph-ziggler
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:29, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Dolph Ziggler. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100928015436/http://www.wrestleview.com/viewnews.php?id=1280413812 to http://wrestleview.com/viewnews.php?id=1280413812
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:15, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

Ziggler dating Amy is far more relevant to "personal life" than what his brothers did in their life which has nothing to do with Ziggler just because they are blood relatives. Also the Ziggler-Amy relation is valid, confirmed and well publicized. So I "re-added" it back. Dilbaggg (talk) 08:01, 14 November 2019 (UTC)Dilbaggg (talk) 07:28, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

He turned 42 years old on 27th of july but the age is still marked as 41 on his page. Thank you. 176.72.98.185 (talk) 08:31, 28 July 2022 (UTC)


### Dolph Ziggler
Although he worked 15 years as Dolph Ziggler, he's lived 43 as Nicholas Nemeth. I wasn't even able to find Goggle, let alone 4.200.000 results for Ziggler. How does this not use the same logic as Sasha Banks -> Mercedes Mone? You all are being awfully ridiculous. 50.32.184.37 (talk) 07:30, 7 June 2024 (UTC)

@AirshipJungleman29: I was looking at the 2023 GAR which you closed as keep. The article had (and still has) uncited statements and unreliable sources. The GAR was closed without discussion, which usually closes as a delist. No statement was given on how it was determined that this should be kept. Should I re-post this to GAR if the concerns are not addressed soon, or should a different action be taken? Do you recall (or perhaps have an educated guess) on how this keep determination was made? Z1720 (talk) 18:49, 4 November 2025 (UTC)

If I had to guess Z1720, probably an accidental misclick. Sorry. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 19:16, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
@AirshipJungleman29: No problem, I just wanted to make sure there wasn't another reason why this was kept. I'll let this thread serve as a notice, then re-post it to GAR after a week so that editors can comment on it again. Z1720 (talk) 19:18, 4 November 2025 (UTC)


### Dolph Ziggler
Article (edit | visual edit | history) ·  Article talk (edit | history) ·  Watch • Watch article reassessment page • Most recent review
Result pending 
Uncited statements and unreliable sources used in the article. Z1720 (talk) 22:18, 14 November 2025 (UTC)

As one man said "dum dum dum another one bites the dust". However, can you point which uncited statements and unreliable sources are? The article is long, so maybe, it's easy to fix the problems if you point them. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 09:57, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
@HHH Pedrigree: CN tags have been added to the article. The unreliable sources are "RingsideNews.com.", "Sportskeeda.com.", "WhatCulture.com", "Wrestlezone" ("WWE SummerSlam Result: Dolph Ziggler vs Dean Ambrose For The WWE Title".), "Online World of Wrestling", and "Cageside Seats". There are also some YouTube links used as sources, that might need to be investigated to ensure they are reliable. Z1720 (talk) 15:05, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
Thanks. I will try to fix them. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 10:31, 18 November 2025 (UTC)