# Talk:Cyclone Hollanda

Talk:Cyclone Hollanda/News - here is the full version of the news articles used in the articles

Not too bad for an article in that basin, but some more work is needed. Inline sourcing would be good. The storm history should provide the entire meteorological history of the storm. Most of the data in the current storm history would probably be more appropriate for the impact section. Likewise, it'd be nice if the impact was expanded more, though I realize that might be difficult for the time period. Question - how come you included a link to Typhoon Tip and List of most intense tropical cyclones in the see also section? ♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 21:27, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
The MH section look like the impact section. Hurricane Typhoon Cyclone 21:11, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

The highest wind information in the infobox and Met history section seem to be contradictory. Which one is the right one? --Izmir2  Let's talk 23:33, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

Yea, I changed it to reflect what the Infobox said. ♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 00:30, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Cyclone Hollanda/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Hurricanefan25 (talk · contribs) 11:59, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
Please bear with me hink, I'm going to do my best to review this article. :) It might take a few days to finish, sorry. HurricaneFan25

I'll be doing a prose/writing around 14:00 UTC. Gotta bounce. HurricaneFan25 12:04, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose):  b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): 

It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 

It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 

It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 

It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 

Overall:
Pass/Fail: 

Comments:
"...in the middle of the Indian Ocean." (lede) "In the middle" sounds a bit awkward.
We regularly use that in the Atlantic (in the middle of the Atlantic Ocean, Gulf of Mexico, Caribbean Sea). Would you recommend "central" instead? ♫ Hurricanehink (talk)  13:37, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
Yep, that's fine. HurricaneFan25 13:39, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
Alright, I clarified. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk)  13:42, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
"Hollanda destroyed or severely damaged 450 houses" (lede) Why not use "and"?
Oh, that wouldn't be true. It destroyed or heavily damaged the 450. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk)  13:37, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
Why not link to the Cyclone Ivy subsection in the 90/95 article? (lede)
Good call. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk)  13:37, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
"...organized convection, or thunderstorms." (MH) You've linked to convection, and it basically tells what convection is, so there's no need to write "or thunderstorms".
Alright, that works. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk)  13:37, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
"...as it moved more poleward" (MH) what does "poleward" mean?
Toward the pole, either north or south pole depending on the hemisphere. I feel it's a pretty common word, but I can change it if you want. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk)  13:37, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
"...and about half without telephone." (impact) Sounds a bit weird, put "service" at the end of the sentence?
Good cal1! ♫ Hurricanehink (talk)  13:37, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
"...cyclone killed two people[4]" (impact) Add punctuation before the ref, a comma would suffice.
MK. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk)  13:37, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
Ref #10 appears to be broken ("Colin Legum/2000")
Ref #15 is broken ("Economist Intelligence Unit/1995")
I fixed both. It was an issue of spacing in cite web. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk)  13:37, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for the review! --♫ Hurricanehink (talk)  13:37, 11 October 2011 (UTC)

Happy to pass. :) HurricaneFan25 13:42, 11 October 2011 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Cyclone Hollanda. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.meteo.fr/temps/domtom/La_Reunion/base_cyclone/nom_annee/HOLLANDA_1993.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 13:04, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Cyclone Hollanda. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120406093259/http://archive.greenpeace.org/climate/database/records/zgpz0258.html to http://archive.greenpeace.org/climate/database/records/zgpz0258.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:41, 4 December 2016 (UTC)