# Talk:John Keats's 1819 odes

This review is transcluded from Talk:John Keats's 1819 odes/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Blurpeace 02:00, 28 February 2010 (UTC)


### Opening comments
The article has some minor stylistic errors, in terms of the references' formatting. I'll go through and correct those. Blurpeace 02:17, 28 February 2010 (UTC)

I may be a little busy in coming days. Once I get in contact with another editor, I'll resume the review. Thanks, Blurpeace 06:35, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
If there are any issues you see with the article, please let me know and I will try to work on them. I understand your busy schedule, as I myself am not editing regularly at the moment. Mrathel (talk) 05:28, 12 March 2010 (UTC)


### Closing comments
I probably won't be able to complete this review in a timely manner, so it may be best to request a new reviewer, Mrathel. There are still some formatting issues, and the sourcing could be done better. The quote may need to be reviewed as well. Good luck, Blurpeace 20:43, 18 March 2010 (UTC)


### New reviewer
New Reviewer: –– Jezhotwells (talk) 21:52, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.


### Checking against GA criteria
GA review (see here for criteria)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose):  b (MoS): 
I made some minor copy-edits for spelling and to fix typos and some very slight re-arrangement to improve readability [1].
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 
The article is weel referenced to a number of sources, I assume good faith as I don not have access to the books. It would be good to add ISBNs to all post 1973 books, but this is not a GA requirement
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 
Good background, focussed on subject.
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 

It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 

Overall:
Pass/Fail: 
I have no hesitation in passing this as a good artcile. Congratulations! –– Jezhotwells (talk) 22:22, 3 April 2010 (UTC)