# Talk:French cruiser Chasseloup-Laubat

This review is transcluded from Talk:French cruiser Chasseloup-Laubat/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Hog Farm (talk · contribs) 19:23, 28 May 2020 (UTC)


### Criteria
1. Prose
2. Verifiability
3. Depth of Coverage
4. Neutral
5. Stable
6. Illustrations
7. Miscellaneous


### Comments
1. 

Rochefort is a duplink
Good catch, sometimes I forget to go back through and check for those.
2.
3. 

I'm going to go ahead and assumed that while the namesake can probably be easily inferred, no source states it directly.
Yes, unfortunately.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Honestly, that's it.  To me at least, it clearly meets the GA requirements, so I'm going to do something I've never done before and just quick-pass this one.  Very good work, I really hope I didn't miss something. Hog Farm (talk) 03:20, 29 May 2020 (UTC)

Thanks again! Parsecboy (talk) 14:14, 29 May 2020 (UTC)