# Talk:Ilyushin Il-32

This review is transcluded from Talk:Ilyushin Il-32/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Grondemar (talk · contribs) 00:29, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
This is a very simple article, with therefore very little to review.  I do have a couple of concerns regarding the need for citations and the infobox image:

Opening sentence: "The Ilyushin Il-32 was a Soviet heavy military glider developed after World War II to deliver 7,000 kg (15,000 lb) of cargo, including 60 troops or a 122 mm (4.8 in) cannon with its prime mover, ammunition and crew."  I know the 60 troops are mentioned in the specifications, but nowhere else in the article is the cannon mentioned.  It should be discussed in the body, with a citation.
The specifications need a citation.
The licensing of the image File:Il32-i.jpg needs to be improved; it certainly wasn't taken in 2004.  The file either needs to be shown to be PD, or a fair-use rationale needs to be provided.
Note that I have tagged the image for deletion at Commons, but I have saved a copy locally to be re-uploaded at en.wp with a FUR if necessary. –Grondemar 00:59, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
All done, image transferred to en.wiki.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 02:23, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose):  b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): 

It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 

It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 

It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 

It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 

Overall:
Pass/Fail: 
This review is placed  on holdfor a minimum of seven days pending resolution of the above concerns.
Thanks. –Grondemar 00:50, 23 December 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for addressing my concerns above.  I will now  pass this article as a Good Article.  Congratulations! –Grondemar 23:56, 26 December 2011 (UTC)