# Talk:Jak and Daxter: The Precursor Legacy

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 3 external links on Jak and Daxter: The Precursor Legacy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060509041159/http://www.gamersmark.com:80/reviews/view/118/ to http://www.gamersmark.com/reviews/view/118
Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090204184354/http://www.computerandvideogames.com:80/article.php?id=22685 to http://www.computerandvideogames.com/article.php?id=22685
Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080314223952/http://www.gameinformer.com:80/Games/Review/200201/R03.0731.1827.56518.htm to http://www.gameinformer.com/Games/Review/200201/R03.0731.1827.56518.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 11:30, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Jak and Daxter: The Precursor Legacy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110716215431/http://www.the-magicbox.com/Chart-USPlatinum.shtml to http://www.the-magicbox.com/Chart-USPlatinum.shtml
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:37, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

Hi - I tagged this as AI generated, as the edits by Cat's Tuxedo (example) display signs of possible LLM use and thus need review for accuracy, source-to-text integrity, tone/original research/editorializing in wikivoice, etc., beyond what was apparently done in GA review. Gnomingstuff (talk) 21:33, 27 October 2025 (UTC)

I'm willing to confirm that I used an LLM to process and summarize the hefty amount of information available for particular sections, namely Development and Reception. To reduce the chance of error, my prompts included the entirety of the cited articles' text, and I made copious use of the Ctrl+F function to ensure accuracy. I acknowledge that the GA review didn't seem incredibly thorough, so I'm open to another set of eyes that can help straighten out any remaining wonkiness that might've evaded notice. Cat's Tuxedo (talk) 00:23, 28 October 2025 (UTC)