# Talk:Chausath Yogini Temple, Mitaoli

The temple was constructed in 8th century according to The Hindu ref.[1] Here 1323 is written based on ASI site; which marks the date of inscription/not date of temple. Correct it. -Nizil (talk) 18:15, 2 August 2015 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Chausath Yogini Temple, Morena/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Tomandjerry211 (alt) (talk · contribs) 10:51, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

The paper ref needs a isbn or oclc.
The book reference is a Government of India document. I could not find its  isbn or oclc
Expand a few refs.
Done
Citations in the lead are unnecessary.
Removed and shifted to the main text
You have nine "addition" words in the short article. I don't think it's necessary.
Except at one place all others are deleted
--Tomandjerry211 (alt) (talk) 10:51, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

@Tomandjerry211 (alt):Thanks for the review. I have complied to the review observations. Pl see.Nvvchar. 03:15, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
Passing,Well done.--Tomandjerry211 (alt) (talk) 11:28, 3 October 2015 (UTC)--Tomandjerry211 (alt) (talk) 11:28, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
@Tomandjerry211 (alt):Thanks. However, the article is still appearing as a GA nominee. Please record approval of this on my talk page also as the bot does not work on my talk page.Nvvchar. 15:14, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
@Tomandjerry211 (alt):Thanks.Nvvchar. 04:14, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Chausath Yogini Temple, Morena. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121106014842/http://wcd.nic.in/research/birth_of_women_dacoit.doc to http://wcd.nic.in/research/birth_of_women_dacoit.doc
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:34, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

मैने सुना की इस मंदीर का ढाचा देखकर ही सांसद की रचना हुई है। Chakradhar Kawadkar (talk) 14:57, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

Hello all. I have raised some concerns about the citations regarding the claim that the temple might have inspired the design of Parliament House. Do participate in the discussion at the talk page there. Tomandjerry211 (alt), Nvvchar, pinging you as you were involved in making this claim a DYK. Kind regards, Wilhelm Tell DCCXLVI converse | fings wot i hav dun 06:57, 5 March 2021 (UTC)