# Talk:Corrida de Cori

This review is transcluded from Talk:Corrida de Cori/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: The Rambling Man (talk · contribs) 22:12, 6 September 2021 (UTC)

Comments

"5 kilometres (3.1 mi) elevation" either "in elevation" or "above an elevation of 5 "
"The range together with several local volcanoes " -> "The range, together with several local volcanoes, "
"the Plio-Pleistocene" vs " of Pliocene-Pleistocene" forgive my ignorance, but is this the same?  The linking is different...
Argentina–Chile border has an article, and it uses an en-dash too.
"lava flows" link?
Link lineament.
"and ENE lineaments" what's ENE?
"magma ascent" link?
There isn't a link for this, but I've explained in the article. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 17:13, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
"primitive basaltic lavas" link?
I can't find an usable definition of the term, so I've cut it. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 17:13, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
"Imilac-Salina" en-dash.
"15-20 mya" en-dash and link mya.
"1-2 " en-dash.
"basaltic andesites and dacitic ignimbrites and ended in the late Quaternary with basaltic andesites in form of cinder cones" link all these jargon terms.
"aeolian activity" link.
"hydrothermal alteration" link.
"These Escorial lava flows are" repetitive.
A lot of those terms I mention above appear to be linked, just not first time.
"fumarole spires" link.
"crustal origin" link.
Rewrote this one. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 17:13, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
"fumarolic alteration" link.
Recast this. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 17:13, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
"at an altitude" elevation.
"about 1,392 millimetres" "about" and then given to the nearest mm??
Cut the "about", it's based on a weather station there. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 17:13, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
"1976-1977" en-dash.
"reported in 1976-1977" ditto.
"p.190" it's normal to have a space between p. and the number.
You sure? I don't think I see such a space frequently. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 17:13, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
I see a space everywhere.  The {{citation}} templates put a space in after the p. or pp.  It's absolutely the case.  The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 17:42, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
@The Rambling Man:Added it. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 17:53, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
"pp.181-182" -> pp. 181–182
"1976-1977" in ref 1 should use en-dash.
Lots of jargon makes this practically inaccessible to non-experts, and a few other formatting issues. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 10:42, 7 September 2021 (UTC)

@The Rambling Man:Replied and processed everything else. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 17:13, 7 September 2021 (UTC)