# Talk:Novalis

The article says: "Influences from the literature of that time can be seen. The metaphors of the hymns are closely connected to the books Novalis had read at about the time of his writing of the hymns. These are prominently Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet..". May I know which that metaphores are?Deafussy (talk) 23:49, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

For anyone interested in the Novalis/Shakespeare connection (11 years after this comment), there's a link reference to JSTOR's copy of Rehder (1948) Wtfiv (talk) 18:03, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

WikiProject Biography Summer 2007 Assessment Drive
The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 22:17, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

Please leave in external link to Times article. It contains excellent information on Novalis.   —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dydimus (talk • contribs) 12:14, 10 June 2008 (UTC) 
I am soon going to load up an updated version of the Novalis article. It is a translation of a the German article written by a friend of mine. As I am not a native speaker of English, I would be very pleased if someone could check the article for mistakes etc. I think I'll upload the text this afternoon.

Ok, maybe you should upload it onto this talk page first, then we'll incorporate it?  Or is that what you meant? Dsol 12:22, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

I upload the text onto this talk page. I've shortened the original article, because I thought that some elements are only of little interest for users of the English Wikipedia.

“Novalis” (* 2. May 1772 on the château Oberwiederstedt; + 25. March 1801 in Weißenfels) was an author and philosopher of the early German Romanticism. His real name was Georg Philipp “Friedrich Freiherr von Hardenberg”.  
LIFE
Friedrich von Hardenberg was born on the 2. May 1772 on the château Oberwiederstedt located in the Harz mountains. The parental residence was rather a manor than a real château.
Novalis descended from ancient, Low German nobility. In the different lines of the family, many important, influential magistrates and ministry officials can be found, for example the Prussian chancellor Karl August von Hardenberg (1750-1822), who is known because of the Stein-Hardenbergschen reforms. 
Beside an oil painting, a christening cap, which is commonly assigned to Novalis, is the only artefact that is left of him. In the church in Wiederstedt he was christened Georg Philipp Friedrich. Novalis spent his childhood on the family estate and used it as starting point for his travels into the Harz mountains. 
Novalis’ father, the estate owner and saline manager Heinrich Ulrich Erasmus Freiherr von Hardenberg (1738-1814), was a strictly pietistic man. Due to his experiences in the past, he had become a member of the Morovian (Herrnhuter) sect. In his second marriage, Novalis’ father was married to Auguste Bernhardine von Hardenberg, née Bölzig (1749-1818), who gave birth to eleven children. Their second child had been Georg Friedrich Freiherr von Hardenberg, who later on named himself Novalis. 
At first Novalis was taught by private tutors. Amongst others by Christian Daniel Erhard Schmid (1762-1812), whom he met again at the beginning of his university education. Novalis attended the Luther grammar school in Eisleben, where he acquired skills in rhetoric and ancient literature, which were common parts of the education of this time. 
From his twelfth year on, Novalis was in charge of his uncle Friedrich Wilhelm Freiherr von Hardenberg at the château Lucklum. 
Novalis studied law from 1790 to 1794 at Jena (where he was attended by his former private teacher Christian Daniel Erhard Schmid), Leipzig, and Wittenberg. He passed his exams with distinction. During his studies he attended Schiller’s lecture courses on history and befriended Schiller during his (Schiller’s) illness. Furthermore he met Goethe, Herder, and Jean Paul, and he became friends with Ludwig Tieck, Friedrich Wilhelm Joseph von Schelling and the brothers Friedrich und August Wilhelm Schlegel. 
In October 1794 Novalis Novalis did not become a civil servant – in contrary to his plans -  but worked as actuary for August Coelestin Just, who was not only his boss, but also his friend and later on his biographer. During this time Novalis met the young Sophie von Kühn (1783-1797). On the 15th March 1795 he became engaged with her. 
In the following January, Novalis was appointed auditor to the directorate of the saline in Weißenfels. The early and cruel death of his fiancée in March 1797 had a deep impact on him. 
1795/1796 Novalis concerned himself with the scientific doctrin of Johann Gottlieb Fichte, which had an great influence on his world view. Because he did not only read Fichte’s philosophies, but he also developed the concepts further. He transformed Fichte’s “Nicht-Ich” (germ. “not I”) to a “Du” (germ. “you), an equal subject to the “Ich” (germ. “I”). This was the starting point for his “Liebesreligion” (germ. “religion of love”).   
A few months later he entered the Mining Academy of Freiberg in Saxony, a leading academy concerning science in this time, to study geology under professor Abraham Gottlob Werner (1750-1817). He soon befriended him. During his studies in Freiberg he learned about mining, mathematics, chemistry and other subjects. This was quite an extensive education. Furthermore he had to undergo a lot of practical schooling in the mines. This schooling was a family tradition. 
In 1798 his first fragments were published in the “Athenäum”, a magazine edited by the brothers Friedrich and August Wilhelm Schlegel, who were also part of the early Romanticism. The title of Novalis’ first publication was “Blüthenstaub”, this is also the first appearance of his pseudonym “Novalis”. 
In December 1798 Novalis became engaged for the second time. His fiancée was “Julie von Charpentier” (1788-1811), a daughter of Johann Friedrich Wilhelm Toussaint von Charpentier, a professor in Freiberg. 
Since Pentecost 1799 Novalis worked again in the directorate of the saline. In December of the same year he became assessor of the saline and member of the directorate of the saline.  
In July 1799 Novalis became acquainted with Ludwig Tieck, in late autumn of the same year he met other authors of the so called “Jenaer Romanticism”. 
Already in the succeeding year, on the 6th December 1800, the 28 years old Hardenberg was appointed “Supernumerar-Amtshauptmann” for the Thuringian District. A position which can be compared with a magistrate of today. 
Since August 1800 Hardenberg suffered incurable from tuberculosis, which made the further practise of his profession impossible. On the 25th March 1801 he died in Weißenfels. 
After his death he was buried on the old cemetery in Weißenfels. 
Novalis lived to see only the publication of the “Blüthenstaub-Fragmente”, “Glaube und Liebe oder der König und die Königin”, and “Hymnen an die Nacht”. His unfinished novels “Heinrich von Ofterdingen” and “Die Lehrlinge zu Sais”, as well as his political speech “Europa” were published posthumously by his friends Ludwig Tieck and Friedrich Schlegel. 

WRITING
It can be justly said that the tireless, contemplating and creative Friedrich von Hardenberg was the most important representative of the early German Romanticism. He had only a few years to discover and develop his writing skills. 
Novalis, who had great knowledge in science, law, philosophy, politics and economy, started writing quite early. He left an astonishing abundance of notes on the above mentioned fields of knowledge and already his early work shows that he was very educated and well read. His later works are closely connected to his studies and his profession. Novalis collected everything that he had learned, reflected upon it and drew connections in the sense of an encyclopaedic overview on art and science. These notes from the years 1798/1799 are called “Allgemeines Brouillon”. 
Together with Friedrich Schlegel, Novalis developed the fragment as a literary form of art. The core of Hardenberg’s literary works is the quest for the connection of science and poetry, and the result was supposed to be a “progressive universal utopia”. Furthermore he was convinced that philosophy and the higher-ranking poetry have to be in a continual interrelation.  
The fact that the romantic fragment is the adequate form for a depiction of the “progressive universal utopia”, can be seen especially in the success of this new genre in the later reception.
Novalis’ whole works are based upon a idea of education (“Wir sind auf einer Mißion: Zur Bildung der Erde sind wir berufen”). It has to be made clear that everything is in a continual process. Same with humans, who always try to approach an earlier – hypothetically assumed - condition, which is characterised by harmony between human and nature.
This idea of the romantic universal utopia can be seen clearly in the romantic triade. This theoretical structure always shows the recipient that the described moment is exactly the  moment (kairos) in which the future is decided. These frequently mentioned critical points correspond with the artist’s feeling for the present, which Novalis shares with many other contemporaries of his time. 
Therefore a triadic structure can be found in most of his works. This means that there are three corresponding structural elements which are written different concerning the content and the form.
Hardenberg’s intensive study of the works of Jakob Böhme, since 1800, has had a verifiable influence on his own writing. 
A mystical world view, a high standard of education and the frequently perceivable pietistic influences are combined in Hardenberg’s attempt to reach a new concept of Christendom, faith, and God. Furthermore he always tries to adjust these with his transcendental philosophy. This can be seen in the “Geistliche Lieder” (published 1802), which soon are a part of Lutheran hymn-books. 

LYRICAL WORK
In August 1800, eight months after completion, the revised edition of the “Hymnen an die Nacht” is published in the “Athenaeum”. They are often considered to be the climax of Novalis’ lyrical works and the most important poetry of the German early Romanticism. 
The six hymns contain many elements which can be understood as autobiographical. Even though not Novalis, but a lyrical I is the speaker, there are many relations between the hymns and Hardenberg’s experiences from 1797-1800. 
The topic is the romantic interpretation of life and death, the threshold which is symbolised by the night. Life and death are – according to Novalis – developed to entwined concepts. So in the end death is the romantic principle of life. 
Influences of the contemporary literature at that time can be proven. The metaphors of the hymns is closely connected to the books Novalis had read in temporal closeness to the writing of the hymns. These are prominently Shakespeare’s “Romeo and Juliet” (in the translation by A.W.Schlegel 1797) and Jean Paul’s “Unsichtbare Loge” (1793). 
The “Hymnen an die Nacht” display a universal religion with a intermediary. This concept is based on the idea that there is always a third party between human and God. This intermediary can either be Jesus – like in Christian Mythology – or the dead beloved like in the hymns. 
This works consists of three times two hymns. These three components can be structured in the following principle: in each case the first hymn shows, with help of the Romantic triade, the development from an assumed, happy life on earth, over a painful era of alienation to salvation in the eternal night. The following hymn tells of the awakening from this vision and longing for a return to it. 
Continually the pairs of hymns increase and with each step show a higher level of experience and knowledge. 
PROSE
The novel fragments “Heinrich von Ofterdingen” and “Die Lehrlinge zu Sais” clearly reflect the idea of describing an universal world harmony with help of poetry. The novel “Heinrich von Ofterdingen” contains the “blue flower”, a symbol that became an emblem for the whole German Romanticism. Originally the novel was supposed to be an answer to Goethe’s “Wilhelm Meister”, a work that Novalis had read with enthusiasm but later on judged as being highly unpoetical. He dislike the victory of the economical over the poetry. 
The speech called “Europa” was written in 1799, but was first published in 1826. It is a poetical, culture historical speech with a focus on a political utopia with regard to the middle ages. In this text Novalis tries to develop a new Europe which is based on a new poetical Christendom which shall lead to unity and freedom. He got the inspiration for this text from Schleiermacher’s “Über die Religion” (1799).
Hi,
My name is Paul Stoll and I was wondering where you got all this information.  I am related to Georg Philipp Friedrich Freiherr von Hardenberg and I'm trying to find out about my family tree.
Regards
Paul Stoll  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.145.242.25 (talk) 23:36, 12 September 2007 (UTC) 

I added a note about Novalis' influence on Hesse. This information was taken from a 1972 Panther reprint of Hesse's 'Demian', where the translator notes that Hesse "so much admired...the poet Novalis", and explains that Emil Sinclair (the pseudonym used by Hesse on the initial publication of the novel) was Novalis' friend.
Any more information of this sort would be welcome and useful; it would help illuminated this great writer's work and broaden his relevance for modern and English-speaking audiences.
--Euchrid9 15:28, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

"The name Sinclair was intended as a tribute to the poet Hölderlin's friend Isaak von Sinclair." Hesse, Hermann. Siddhartha, Demian and Other Writings. The German Library 71. New York: Continuum, 1992. p. 221.
"Even when he signs one of his books with a pseudonym, as Demian appeared under the pseudonym Emil Sinclair, it is to find himself again by trying to identify himself magically with a chosen historic personality: Hölderlin's friend." Blanchot, Maurice. The Book to Come. Meridian. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 2003. p. 167.
See also Kaznina, Elena. "Die Geschichte von Emil Sinclairs Jugend (Hermann Hesse - Demian): Parallelen zwischen dem Leben der Hauptperson und dem des Autors". 2003. 96.24.99.118 (talk) 04:22, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
Two accessible English-language articles addressing the Hesse/Novalis connection are now references in the article.  Wtfiv (talk) 18:09, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

Should mention be made of the poet James Thomson (B.V.), author of The City of Dreadful Night?  The B.V. in his name stands for Bysshe Vanolis, the latter being an anagram of Novalis.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.231.196.140 (talk) 12:13, 27 July 2009 (UTC) 

Can anybody start a stub article on Magical idealism? Thanks. -- 201.51.221.66 15:44, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
Done.  Of course, I botched the capitalization on the article, so there's a stub for Magical idealism but not Magical Idealism.  Someone fix that? Hansonfan 06:48, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

I merged it back into the article.  Not much there. —Viriditas | Talk 11:08, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
Expanded Magical idealism section so that if forms a substantive section. Another problem with making Magical Idealism its own article is that the term was later co-opted by the Italian philosopher and fascist Julius Evola who used the term quite differently.  In my opinion, Novalis's idea of  magical idealism is better off staying within the article so the interested reader can focus on Novalis's sense of the term. Wtfiv (talk) 17:25, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

I'm fairly new to Wikipedia but my native language is English and this article reads like a translation.  So I'd like to reshape the language, to let it read comfortably in English without changing any of the meaning.  Unfortunately, because the author/translator has not signed, I cannot ask you direct. Therefore I'm going to leave this note for a few days, and if nobody objects, I shall edit. Thanks Lucy Skywalker 22:35, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
Done! Lucy Skywalker 18:28, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

Some people ascribe a quote (not excact) to Novalis 'Your so-called religion is like opium: it transforms and deadens the pain, instead of giving the strength'. Can you clarify that, when and where he said/wrote that if he ever did?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.218.188.179 (talk) 14:59, 13 January 2009 (UTC) 
Deafussy (talk) 23:49, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

It's in a collection of fragments by Novalis called Pollen.KD Tries Again (talk) 02:59, 17 April 2010 (UTC)KD Tries Again
Mentioned the Marx/Novalis affinity regarding this metaphor/simile in "Influences" section and supported it with citation. Also added note that Novalis influenced Joseph Beuys's comment that "Everyone is an artist". The Beuys/Novalis connection is mentioned all over the net and even in Wikipedia, so I figured it should be on Novalis's own page too.Wtfiv (talk) 17:17, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

"More recently, Novalis, as well as the Early Romantic (Frühromantik) movement as a whole, has been recognized as constituting a separate philosophical school, as opposed to simply a literary movement. Recognition of the distinctness of Fruhromantik philosophy is owed in large part, in the English speaking world at least, to the writer Frederick Beiser."
This lacks a reference. Perhaps it should be removed?
67.2.46.150 (talk) 04:28, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

Integrated the idea of this quote in the discussion of Novalis's legacy. Beiser's impact on considering Novalis more seriously as a philosopher is not mentioned explicitly in the article's text at this point, but he is cited a number of times.  An interested reader could follow up by looking at Beiser's works.  Unfortunately, his major contributions to these ideas are academic press books that are not easy to access without a account with a university library. However, the current citations do link to those accessible Google Book pages that get as close to the stated point as possible. Maybe future editors can find even better, more complete accessible references. Wtfiv (talk) 17:20, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

Hello @Kaitheloner: I made some edits to the material you just added. It would be best if you could cite a source for the statement you make. Thanks. Eric talk 17:09, 21 August 2020 (UTC)

Hello @Eric: Added references. I'm sorry, I'm a bit new to this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kaitheloner (talk • contribs) 06:49, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for adding the ref. I added the page number after looking up the Warnes book on Google Books, but that page does not seem to state what you put forth in the article, so you may want to see if there is a page to cite. Also, note that all nouns are capitalized in German. Eric talk 14:17, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
Hi, I have the PDF with me. Can I share the relevant page through google drive? Apologies for the late reply. I don't log in much and browse Wikipedia logged off.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kaitheloner (talk • contribs) 20:37, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

Hello @Eric: and @Kaitheloner:.  I'm reaching out to you two as you are the ones who have edited this page recently.  While trying to add a couple of references to the unreferenced material (much of which seems derived from Dydimus in 2008).  I saw that the references throughout the article are a bit messy.  I would like to clean them up a bit and make them more consistent, but feel that it is easiest to do so if I can change the formatting to a list-defined reference format.  This may help with housekeeping in the future, but if you feel that you'd like to keep the various styles it currently has, I won't change things.  Thanks for your consideration. (And please, if anybody else sees this note and has a strong opinion, please let me know. If I don't hear back within a week, I'll assume it's okay to do the migration.) Wtfiv (talk) 19:18, 17 October 2020 (UTC)

Hi- Sounds like a good idea to me. Eric talk 02:24, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
@Eric: Thanks for the reply, I just went ahead and moved the references. I tried to do a thorough first pass at cleaning them up, making them consistent and giving as many as possible accessible links.  Hopefully, it'll make this article easier to clean up someday. Wtfiv (talk) 01:00, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
Now that I've worked through the references, the article seems like it could use a lot of organization.  On the whole, the extant references seem solid, but I agree more needs to be added.  The various sections seem to have a lot of information but many of the paragraphs (especially regarding his work) seem to need more continuity.  I'm going to give a try to editing the article's prose to a more integrative whole with a few more references Wtfiv (talk) 01:09, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

Though it wasn't my intention when I first moved the references to the reflist, I've now done a major edit on this article. My inspiration was due to the fact that when I wanted to learn about Novalis, the lead was bare, and the rest of the article had some interesting information but was very much disorganized, fragmented and unsourced. One goal was to unify and expand the article, keeping as many of the original editors' points as possible. 
I've attempted to support almost every point, including those made by previous editors, with references. Most references have an active link that gets as near the source material as possible so the information can be verified or used as a source in its own right. I tried to use free and open access materials and honor their accessibility by showing them with the green and orange open lock icons.  I also added a number of free access versions of Novalis's work in the "Writings" section.  Most of these are from the 1800s, but they are still good.  I didn't attempt to be comprehensive, but to give the interested reader a sampling of the variety of interpretations.  As a final note, I've also done a bit of aesthetic work by adding pictures and moving the old ones around a bit. Most of the images I added are supported by citations that link the works to Novalis.  Wtfiv (talk) 21:09, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

Looking at similar articles I think this may meet Good Article criteria, so I nominated it.Wtfiv (talk) 18:46, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Novalis/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Whiteguru (talk · contribs) 20:42, 18 October 2021 (UTC)

Starts GA Review. The review will follow the same sections of the Article.  Thank you --Whiteguru (talk) 20:42, 18 October 2021 (UTC)

('scuzi: we were busy at COP26...)
 


### Observations
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
   HTML document size: 440 kB
   Prose size (including all HTML code): 66 kB
   References (including all HTML code): 176 kB
   Wiki text: 95 kB
   Prose size (text only): 35 kB (5694 words) "readable prose size"
   References (text only): 18 kB

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, spelling, and grammar):  b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): 
In the lead, drop links to pen name, mineralogy, Hymns to the Night, Athenaeum, tuberculosis, cystic fibrosis, fragment. (Hymns is linked extensively in writings.)(First link to Athenaeum is in Freiberg: The Mining Academy)
Links deleted. Hymns linked once in lead and first time in main article.  In Writings, links are to the particular works. Overlinks to August Schlegel and Schleiermacher removed too. Y
Birth and early background: remove link to rhetoric;
Link deleted. Y
Jena, Leipzig, Wittenberg: Legal Studies: remove link to law in the first sentence.
Link deleted. Y
Freiberg: The Mining Academy: drop link to galvanism, alchemy, industrialisation.
Link deleted. Y
In 1798, Novalis's "fragments"  → linking to fragments here is confusing; it appears you are linking to the document. If this is a document (apparently) then consider dropping that link and italicizing the text as per other text references.
Removed quotation marks and link.  Fragment is already defined earlier, so this should just stand as a word.  Y
As romantic poet: Reading reference 45 is not clear that MacDonald defined Novalis like so: also understood him as a poet of mystic desire. That particular reference has MacDonald consider Novalis a mystic poet. Consider. (Mystic desire is not a common term, nor is it theologically defined.)
Changed to mystic poet. Y
Magical idealism: Linking to immanence is confusing as the subject is health, and not the immanence of divinity which this article is (mostly) about. Consider.
link removed. Y
Religious views: drop the link to hymnals, Medieval, Catholic Church, logos, cosmopolitan.
removed hymnal, Medieval, Catholic Church.  Would like to keep logos, as it refers to the neoplatonist version of the concept (e.g., Hemsterhuis's use). Similarly, the link to cosmopolitanism distinguishes the philosophical concept of this article from the ordinary, though closely related regular meaning of the word. Y
Upon examining reference [2]: 46–47 , I do not find any claim or statement that Novalis was Pietist all his life and up to his death. Consider this claim suspect and unfounded.
Agreed, sentence deleted. Just mentions him reading Zinzendorf, whose roots are in Pietism, but he mentions Boehme as well, whose system is something different. Y
Political writings: we may drop the links to Prussia, Christendom. Y
Links deleted.

It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):  d (copyvio and plagiarism): 

It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 
Good work in the Writings section with links to Novalis's works: Poetry, Unifinished novels and Fragments
In Political Writings, there is a telling comment from Frederick Wilhelm III about the impossibly high standards.
Stoljar gives an interesting overview of magical idealism;
The Influence section is well curated with plentiful sources and references to Novalis.
It is challenging to deconstruct an author who used poetry to develop philosophy. However, this is carried off well in this article.
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 
NPOV is preserved in this article.
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 
Page created 23 April 2003 - a very old page.
Page has 1,267 edits by 357 editors
Cluebot NG has not been on the page, suggesting there has been nil vandalism
majority of edits (by year) have been in 2020 (700+ edits)
90 day page views =  17,039 with a daily average of 187 views
Examination of page history shows steady improvement, no edit-warring
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 
File:Franz Gareis - Novalis.jpg =copyright term is the author's life plus 100 years or fewer.
File:Schloss Oberwiederstedt.jpg =  Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Germany license.
File:Hardenberg-Ns-Wappen.png = claimed copyright term is the author's life plus 70 years or fewer.
File:Sophie von Kühn.jpg = claimed copyright term is the author's life plus 70 years or fewer.
File:Novalisplaque.jpg =  Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, 2.5 Generic, 2.0 Generic and 1.0 Generic license.
File:Weissenfels Hardenberg Novalis.jpg = Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, 2.5 Generic, 2.0 Generic and 1.0 Generic license.
File:Brooklyn Museum - Night (Die Nacht) - Philipp Otto Runge.jpg = claimed,  the copyright term is the author's life plus 100 years or fewer.
File:Philipp Otto Runge 001.jpg = claimed,  the copyright term is the author's life plus 100 years or fewer.
File:Caspar David Friedrich - Der Mönch am Meer - Google Art Project.jpg = claimed,  the copyright term is the author's life plus 100 years or fewer.
File:Novalis.jpg = claimed,  the copyright term is the author's life plus 100 years or fewer.
File:Novalis ms.jpg = the copyright term is the author's life plus 70 years or fewer.
File:Weißenfels, Klosterstraße 24-20151105-001.jpg = Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license.
All images have fair use rationales and suitable captions.
Overall:
This is an old page, and it has gone in many directions, considering the Talk page. The hand of many editors over the years is apparent.
Yes, I've done what I could to integrate this into a relatively continuous narrative, but keeping most of the verifiable contributions.  This was a challenge at times. Y
There is some overlinking; fragments and immanent can have some clarity.
Most overlinking should be addressed.  Fragments left as a word, as it is already defined previously in article.  Immanent is contextually appropriate, but link removed as misleading. Y
I would like to see some clarity around the claim that he was a Pietist all his life.
This was deleted.  Perhaps it could be stated he kept his family's commitment to Zizendorf, but this is already implied in his brother's testimony. Y
With attention to these minor matters, the article will pass to GA. --Whiteguru (talk) 04:36, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Thank you for taking the time with this article, Whiteguru.  I hope this addresses your major concerns.  If not, please let me know!
@Wtfiv: I thank you kindly for your initiative here. As seen, this page began life in 2003 and has passed through both translation and editors. A good result.
 
 Passed

 

I'm considering moving the references from their "ref" format to an "sfn" format. Concerns? Wtfiv (talk) 18:29, 6 August 2023 (UTC)