# Talk:HMS Grenville (H03)

This review is transcluded from Talk:HMS Grenville (H03)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Bernstein2291 (Talk • Contributions • Sign Here) 20:48, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose):  b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): 

It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 
Can you find any more sources about this ship?
Sure, but they don't have as much detail as the ones used.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 12:50, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
So you would get no new information by using those other sources? Bernstein2291 (Talk • Contributions • Sign Here) 17:06, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
Exactly. She had such a short life that there's not much coverage on her, unlike her sisters.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 23:06, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 

It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 

It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 
Are there any photos or diagram of the ship?
Not for her, but I added one for her sister.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 12:50, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
Not even a diagram? Bernstein2291 (Talk • Contributions • Sign Here) 17:06, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
Nothing that's not copyrighted.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 23:06, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
Overall:
Pass/Fail: 

I've added another source.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 16:47, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

I've asked for a second opinion. While on paper it should pass, my gut is telling me different. Bernstein2291 (Talk • Contributions • Sign Here) 05:25, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
I'm going to pass it. Bernstein2291 (Talk • Contributions • Sign Here) 02:19, 25 March 2011 (UTC)