# Talk:Military history of Gibraltar during World War II

I am listing the article under the GA list as it clearly meets all aspects of the good article criteria.  This article is approaching Feature quality in the future; one thing to consider is that there are several rather short sections; while these will pass the "broad" requirement for GA, these will not stand under the stricter "comprehensive" requirement of FA.  But over all, the article is top notch, and people who have worked on it should be proud! --Jayron32|talk|contribs 05:34, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

Excellent thanks; I am glad to see that the hard work paid off. I am not too concerned about the shorter of sections at the moment because I think I have the ideal book, yet I cannot seem to find it now (Sod's law!). But yes, these sections will need to be extensively expanded before any future developments.
It's a fairly recent article and most sections seem to be reasonably intact. Anyhow, thanks again. Chris.B 09:44, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

Hallo!
I still miss information on the development of the groundtroops, AA staff and naval strength on Gibraltar, especially during the crucial period at the beginning of the war until the Fall of France, while the danger of a Spanish-German invasion was looming.
Kind regards, --TheGriffon (talk) 12:41, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

The image File:LeO 451.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here.  In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page.  Please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
That this article is linked to from the image description page.
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --04:04, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

On looking through this article its seems odd that Force H is only mentioned in the lede and that there is almost no mention of what 202 Squadron actually did during WWII. A section on offensive operations based from Gibraltar or something similar looks necessary. Mikenorton (talk) 00:32, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

I think its worth mentioning the strategic importance Fisher attributed to Gibraltar.  5 keys lock up the world! Singapore, the Cape, Alexandria, Gibraltar, Dover. These five keys belong to England.  Unfortunately most of the references are via google books and I don't have a better reference.  Can anyone oblige?  JRPG (talk) 10:45, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Military history of Gibraltar during World War II. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070403055952/http://www.gibraltar.gov.gi:80/latest_news/topical_speeches/operation_torch.htm to http://www.gibraltar.gov.gi/latest_news/topical_speeches/operation_torch.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 02:42, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Military history of Gibraltar during World War II. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20120519085844/http://www.aboutourrock.com/culture/tracer/operationtracer.htm to http://www.aboutourrock.com/culture/tracer/operationtracer.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 20:56, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Military history of Gibraltar during World War II. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070415222402/http://www.rafweb.org/Grp07.htm to http://www.rafweb.org/Grp07.htm
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110723094719/http://www.dziennik.com/www/dziennik/kult/archiwum/07-12-02/pp-09-13-02.html to http://www.dziennik.com/www/dziennik/kult/archiwum/07-12-02/pp-09-13-02.html
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090303231404/http://www.udskior.gov.pl/kombatant/200306_spec.pdf to http://www.udskior.gov.pl/kombatant/200306_spec.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:06, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

It has been a while since this article has been reviewed, so I took a look and noticed uncited statements, including entire paragraphs. Should this article go to WP:GAR? Z1720 (talk) 03:29, 23 November 2025 (UTC)