# Talk:Mattachine Midwest

This review is transcluded from Talk:Mattachine Midwest/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: JJonahJackalope (talk · contribs) 19:56, 30 May 2025 (UTC)
Reviewer: Niossim (talk · contribs) 16:48, 7 August 2025 (UTC)


### GA review
Last updated: 18:21, 7 August 2025 (UTC) by Niossim 
See what the criteria are and what they are not
1) Well-written

 1a) the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct
 1b) it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation
2) Verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check

 2a) it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline
 2b) reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose)
 2c) it contains no original research
 2d) it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism
3) Broad in its coverage

 3a) it addresses the main aspects of the topic
 3b) it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style)
4) Neutral:

 4) Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each
5) Stable:

 5) Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute
6) Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio

 6a) media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content
 6b) media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions
Overall:  


#### Comments:
Looking good! I will look at the sources this afternoon.
Alright! That didn't take as long as I thought it might. This article is very well sourced! I didn't find any claims that weren't backed by a source. Each source has a URL that is working properly. All sourced books have the appropriate page numbers. 
Overall this article is well written. I had a good time going through it. I had never heard of Mattachine Midwest and I feel like this article does a great job explaining the topic. The prose is clear and enjoyable to read. I feel like it covered all aspects of the topic well without getting too detailed on any one idea.
Congratulations! I am going to pass this article. Great work!