# Talk:First Ward Wardroom

This review is transcluded from Talk:First Ward Wardroom/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: 23W (talk · contribs) 01:30, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar):  b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): 

It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 

It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 

It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 

It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 

Overall:
Pass/Fail: 


### Comments
R/T, made copy edits:

Change the number sign into "No." in the lead.
"Since about 1920 the Gatchell Post": should there be a comma after 1920 (genuinely asking)?
"Historically significant as a historical reminder": probably don't need the last "historical".
Token book source (mentioned on page 726), might be nice to incorporate, database source too.
Purty house; nice article. On hold for a fortnight. 23W 05:43, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

@23W: I did the fixes as requested. For the 3rd bullet point I dropped the first instance because the "historical reminder" is the emphasis. The first instance of historically can be to "was or continues to be" whereas the other is more of the state of being. I added the RI listing, but kept the NRIS book listing out because it is just an older version of what was cited already. I like the designs of the William R. Walker & Son buildings. Though Henry Hobson Richardson works are nice as well! These articles on such buildings and work is one of the few easily accessible overviews of rare architecture styles and civic pride and I was glad to have done them. There are only three ward halls remaining in the state and you seen the Fifth Ward room, but I got almost nothing on the Cato Hill Historic District one. Thanks for reviewing. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 19:40, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
 @ChrisGualtieri: You're welcome! Yeah, these articles are deffo neat, hopefully they'll inspire more coverage of the buildings. Passing. 23W 00:10, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on First Ward Wardroom. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://archive.is/20141205065921/http://www.pawtuckettimes.com/content/veterans-struggle-raise-funds-vfw-post-repairs to http://www.pawtuckettimes.com/content/veterans-struggle-raise-funds-vfw-post-repairs
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:56, 30 September 2017 (UTC)