# Talk:French ironclad Héroïne

This review is transcluded from Talk:French ironclad Héroïne/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Hog Farm (talk · contribs) 14:25, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

Indicate in the infobox that the draft figure is at deep load
"The ship displaced between 5,969 metric tons (5,875 long tons)" - The use of between is odd here.  It implies there's a second figure in the range, which should be added.  If there's not a second figure, remove "between"
Just out of curiosity, is the upper figure in the the complement range for when it was a flagship?  Is so, it should probably be indicated.
You're probably right, but not specified in the sources.
Prose gives conning tower armor as 100 mm, infobox gives 102 mm
Waterline is a duplink
I'm not seeing where the Stenzel and Konstam references listed in the bibliography are used
Deleted Konstam, Stenzel is referenced in #10. Every once in a while I combine refs when it's too much trouble to sort out which fact goes with which source.
In the Roche ref, (1671-1870) looks like it's part of a volume name.  If so, it should be with the volume name, not stuck after the OCLC.
Any chance of an OCLC for Stenzel and Wilson?
Worldcat suggests that Roche is in French, if that's correct, then indicate in the citation
That's it, I believe.  Just a little tidying up to do here. Hog Farm  Bacon 16:16, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

Looks like I forgot to update the bibliography on this article, n'est-ce pas? Thanks for reviewing this so quickly.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 17:03, 31 August 2020 (UTC)