# Talk:Denmark at the 1952 Winter Olympics

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 14:14, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Denmark at the 1952 Winter Olympics. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070930155854/http://www.la84foundation.org/6oic/OfficialReports/1952/or1952w.pdf to http://www.la84foundation.org/6oic/OfficialReports/1952/or1952w.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:37, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Denmark at the 1952 Winter Olympics/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: MWright96 (talk · contribs) 18:19, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
I'll review this one. MWright96 (talk) 18:19, 28 November 2018 (UTC)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose):  b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): 

It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 

It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 

It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 

It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 

Overall:
Pass/Fail: 


### Background
"The National Olympic Committee and Sports Confederation of Denmark was formally recognized" - recognised
Are you sure on these?  The "z" form is used by Americans.  Courcelles (talk) 15:30, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
"Denmark was represented in Oslo by a single figure skater," - try In Oslo, Denmark was represented by a single figure skater,


### Figure skating
"and had previousily represented" - typo; should be previously
"At the 1948 Winter Olympics he had" -  a comma is needed between "Olympics" and "he"
"The men's singles here in Oslo were held over 19–21 February 1952." - The Oslo men's singles were held over 19–21 February 1952.
Consider inserting a wikiilnk of 6.0 system to ordinal placement for those unfamiliar with figure skating.
"and his lowest ranking was fourteenth four of fourteen skaters" - eliminate "four"
Maybe add the "scope=col" field to the data table per MOS:DTT?
Good effort so far. Nothing major popped up during my review. MWright96 (talk) 19:26, 28 November 2018 (UTC)

Everything has been addressed, MWright96.  Thanks for the review! Courcelles (talk) 15:33, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
@Courcelles: Now promoting to GA class. MWright96 (talk) 16:10, 29 November 2018 (UTC)