# Talk:Maryland Route 70

This review is transcluded from Talk:Maryland Route 70/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: TCN7JM (talk · contribs) 02:13, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
Either tonight, if I'm up to it, or tomorrow. –TCN7JM 02:13, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
Alright. Let's get this started.
...or not. I have read the article twice and found no errors. So...
Final verdict

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose):  b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): 

It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 

It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 

It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 

It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 
Overall: Congratulations on having the first article that I have passed without putting on hold.
Pass/Fail: