# Talk:Brough Castle

I've gone through and given the article a bit of a scrub, added a floor plan etc. Probably introduced a few typos as well in the process... Hchc2009 (talk) 15:34, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Brough Castle/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Hawkeye7 (talk · contribs) 23:50, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality: 

The castle was finally restored in the late 17th century Um, it wasn't finally restored, and it wasn't the late 17th century. Re-phrase.
B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists: 

three disambig links:
Cobble
River Eden
Wark Castle
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources: 

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary: 

Where you have a URL, no need an accessdate
C. No original research: 

Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects: 

B. Focused: 

Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias: 

Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc: 

Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales: 
All pictures have appropriate rationales
B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions: 

Overall:
Pass or Fail: 

Hopefully all done now - thanks for the review! Hchc2009 (talk) 18:26, 2 May 2012 (UTC)