# Talk:Money Can't Buy

This review is transcluded from Talk:Money Can't Buy/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 21:27, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

I'll take this, should have this to you within a day or two and will mainly focus on copyediting issues. Thanks, ☠ Jaguar ☠ 21:27, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors: 

B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists: 

Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. Has an appropriate reference section: 

B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary: 

C. No original research: 

Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects: 

B. Focused: 

Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias: 

Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc: 

Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content: 

B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions: 

Overall:
Pass or Fail: 


### Initial comments
The lead summarises the article well, so I couldn't find any problems here. One thing I would suggest however is that the second paragraph could expand on what critics thought of the show?
Added
Can the opening of the Broadcasts and live recording section be expanded? It seems too short that it disrupts flow
That was all the information I could find regarding the concert's broadcast.
"On 22 November, it was broadcast on ITV1, a television channel in the United Kingdom" - cut to On 22 November, it was broadcast on ITV1, in the United Kingdom
Added
"In the United States, it was released on 7 September" - on what format? DVD? Television?
It's only available as a DVD. But I mentioned it nonetheless.
"Commercially, the DVD was successful." - was it successful everywhere? Worldwide or just some countries?
I removed the sentence completely


#### References
All references are in working order and the citations are in the correct places, so this meets the criteria

Thanks!


### On hold
This is a good article; it is well written and comprehensive, very worthy of becoming a GA. The concerns are very minor, so I'll put this on hold for the standard seven days and once those issues are addressed we'll take another look. Regards ☠ Jaguar ☠ 14:08, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

I hope your concerns are addressed to your satisfaction. Thank you for the review --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 12:03, 29 December 2014 (UTC)


### Close - promoted
Thanks for addressing them, I think that's it for now. This article meets the criteria, so promoting  ☠ Jaguar ☠ 21:27, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

Thanks a lot! --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 13:44, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

The album covers used in the sections have been nominated for deletion.  The discussion is at Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2020 January 10#Money Can't Buy files -- Whpq (talk) 13:55, 10 January 2020 (UTC)