# Talk:Kanthaugen Freestyle Arena

This review is transcluded from Talk:Kanthaugen Freestyle Arena/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Grondemar (talk · contribs) 19:31, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
 Working Will post the review shortly. –Grondemar 19:31, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
This article is very close to meeting the Good Article criteria; I have only a couple of minor concerns:

What is Kanthaugen?  Is it a village, a mountain, or something else.  It's a little unclear from the text.
"At the time of the closing, it was suggested reopened as part of a controversial proposal to build a tobogganing slide from Kanthaugen to Stampesletta." Passive voice: who is suggesting that the ski lift be reopened?
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose):  b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): 

It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 

It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 

It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 

It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 

Overall:
Pass/Fail: 
This review is being placed  on hold for a minimum of seven days to allow the above concerns to be addressed.
Thanks. –Grondemar 20:06, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for the review. I've amended the two sentences per your concerns. Arsenikk (talk) 12:54, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
Looks good, thanks for addressing my concerns.  I shall now  pass this good article nomination.  Congratulations! –Grondemar 01:06, 23 December 2011 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 6 external links on Kanthaugen Freestyle Arena. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.olympiaparken.no/index.php/en/our-venues/kanthaugen-freestyle-arena
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.fis-ski.com/uk/disciplines/freestyle/fisworldcup.html?place_search=Lillehammer
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.insidethegames.biz/olympics/youth-olympics/2016/15116-lillehammer-awarded-2016-winter-youth-olympic-games
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.idrett.no/nyheter/Documents/YOG2016_Lillehammer_PHOTO.PDF
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101202195006/http://www.la84foundation.org/6oic/OfficialReports/1994/E_BOOK3.PDF to http://www.la84foundation.org/6oic/OfficialReports/1994/E_BOOK3.PDF
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101202195105/http://www.la84foundation.org/6oic/OfficialReports/1994/E_BOOK4.PDF to http://www.la84foundation.org/6oic/OfficialReports/1994/E_BOOK4.PDF
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:20, 2 May 2017 (UTC)