# Talk:Hum Aapke Dil Mein Rehte Hain

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Hum Aapke Dil Mein Rehte Hain. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150805010206/http://boxofficeindia.com/Movies/movie_detail/hum_aapke_dil_mein_rehte_hain to http://boxofficeindia.com/Movies/movie_detail/hum_aapke_dil_mein_rehte_hain
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150805010206/http://boxofficeindia.com/Movies/movie_detail/hum_aapke_dil_mein_rehte_hain to http://boxofficeindia.com/Movies/movie_detail/hum_aapke_dil_mein_rehte_hain
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:51, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

Review by Deepa Gahlot on IndiaMovies, a popular website of the times. Shahid • Talk2me 22:43, 9 November 2020 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Hum Aapke Dil Mein Rehte Hain/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: SL93 (talk · contribs) 05:18, 15 January 2021 (UTC)


### The lead
"Hum Aapke Dil Mein Rehte Hain (English: I Live in Your Heart) is a 1999 Indian Hindi-language romantic drama film directed by Satish Kaushik and produced by D. Ramanaidu for his banner Suresh Productions."
I suggest changing "banner" to company or something similar. It isn't often that the word banner is used in this way.
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 05:27, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
"It starred" and "playing  supporting roles".
Starred should be changed to stars. Playing would better as "in supporting roles".
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 05:27, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
"The film telling the story"
This should be "The film tells the story".
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 05:27, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
"served as a remake"
Should be "serves as a remake". Better yet, it could "is a remake".
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 05:27, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
"and lyrics are penned by"
"and the lyrics were written by"
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 05:27, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
"garnered well-response from audience"
This sentence should be removed entirely per my next point below or it should be made clear that it's not from critics.
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 05:27, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
"The film received mixed-to-positive reviews"
Are these reviews from critics?
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 05:27, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
"with mostly critical praise was directed"
The word "was" is not needed.
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 05:27, 15 January 2021 (UTC)


### Plot section
"The pampered Vijay has completed his education and now indulges in life's temptations to the extreme."
How does he indulge in life's temptations to the extreme?
Removed --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 06:45, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
"Megha is Vishwanath's personal assistant in his office. She is a hardworking girl struggling to support her family."
Instead of two sentences, this can be combined into one sentence due to both of them focusing on the same character.
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 05:48, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
"Vishwanath asks Megha to quit her job and marry his son, but she refuses when she hears Vijay's strange condition."
Why would she ask Megha to do that? What is the strange condition?
Changed --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 06:45, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
"Vijay wants the marriage to be on a contract basis for a year and, if he does not fall in love with his wife in that duration, the marriage will be annulled."
Why does Vijay want that?
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 06:45, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
"However, Megha's family is in dire financial straits and, so, she has to reconsider this offer."
How will the marriage give wealth to Megha's family?
I think the sentence is clear now --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 08:07, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
"In return for marrying Vijay, she asks for financial support for her family, which Vishwanath readily provides."
Why did Vishwanath readily provide financial support?
I think the sentence is clear now --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 08:07, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
"when he meets with an accident"
This part sounds unusually phrased. What is the accident?
Changed, a car accident --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 07:59, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
"At the end of the year, however, Vijay decides to annul the marriage, as had been agreed upon."
Why did Vijay decide to do that? It seemed like a happy marriage from the sentence before it.
I think it's better now --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 08:15, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
"After the separation, Vijay seems to be enjoying himself; but slowly and eventually, he starts to feel a longing for the presence of his devoted wife."
Why does he feel that longing?
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 08:16, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
"Complications arise when Megha finds out that she is pregnant with Vijay's child."
What complications?
It's already cleared... --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 08:27, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
"People in her neighbourhood start to question her stay at her mother's house and the identity of the child's father."
Why are they questioning those things?
That's a normal thing when a woman suddenly get pregnant, while she's not with her husband or doesn't have a husband. As we know that India has many norms. In my country, it also happened --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 08:27, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
"In order to support herself, Megha gets a job in a new company"
"starts a job"
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 05:49, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
"Vijay continues to pursue her and leaves no stone unturned to show her that he cares for her."
What does he do to show her that?
Concise --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 08:40, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
"Vishwanath and Vijay attend the ceremony as well and give her presents"
It should be clarified as to who is receiving the presents.
"An argument follows; Vijay and his father walk out, followed by all the guests."
What is the argument about?
Removed, as this part is unimportant. --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 08:42, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
"Near the completion of her pregnancy, Megha learns that troublemakers Khairati Lal and Yeshwant Kumar, who had once attempted to kill Vijay, have escaped from prison."
This plot point seems to have came from out of nowhere.
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 08:43, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
"On the way, she learns that the whole thing was a set-up by Vijay's friends to lure her back to her husband."
Why did her friends want to lure her back to her husband?
"As soon as she meets him, she accuses him of this shameless act."
What shameless act?
"Vijay then staggers towards her, with his stomach pierced by a piece of glass and blood pouring from the wound. It turns out that Khairati and Yeshwant have attacked him in reality."
I'm confused. There is no transition anywhere from the last plot point to the stabbing happening. Why add "in reality"? I didn't think that the film was based in a virtual world or something.
I'll rewatch the film, so i can match the plot section; i watched it a few months ago, i'm so sorry... --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 05:35, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

SL93 I think the plot section is clear now, you can review it now :) --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 13:43, 15 January 2021 (UTC)


### Production section
"was remade from"
"is a remake of"
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 05:36, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
"and marking"
"and it marks"
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 05:36, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
"comeback to"
"return to" sounds better
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 05:36, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
"Meanwhile, Kajol who almost twenty years younger than him was cast as the film's protagonist"
I don't see how it is relevant how much younger she is.
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 05:36, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
"was done"
This part doesn't sound encyclopedic. A different word other than done should be used.
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 05:36, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
"Some songs were shot"
I think you mean "Some songs were recorded"
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 05:36, 15 January 2021 (UTC)


### Release section
Produced under the Suresh Productions banner"
It seems like the word banner can be removed. Maybe change it to "Produced by Suresh Productions"
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 05:37, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
"According to review aggregator website Rotten Tomatoes, it was available for streaming on Prime Video since May 2019."
This would be better as "It was available for streaming on Prime Video since May 2019" due to it not being a controversial statement.
Done --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 05:37, 15 January 2021 (UTC)


### References
How are Planet Bollywood and Bollywood Hungama reliable sources?
Aitraaz, which is a featured article, uses a source from Planet Bollywood. Bollywood Hungama is a big and famous entertainment portal, and has established in 1999. Many articles like Kareena Kapoor, Preity Zinta and Shah Rukh Khan use it. --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 05:39, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Awesome. You can consider this part as completed. SL93 (talk) 05:40, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Everything matches the references and this should be good to go after these issues are resolved. SL93 (talk) 05:20, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

Nicholas Michael Halim Will 7 days give you enough time to watch the film? SL93 (talk) 05:42, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Yeah... --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 05:46, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
I made some minor edits and this is approved for GA now. SL93 (talk) 13:56, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
1. Well written?:

Prose quality: 
Manual of Style compliance: 
2. Factually accurate and verifiable?:

References to sources: 
Citations to reliable sources, where required: 
No original research: 
3. Broad in coverage?:

Major aspects: 
Focused: 
4. Reflects a neutral point of view?:

Fair representation without bias: 
5. Reasonably stable?

No edit wars, etc. (Vandalism does not count against GA): 
6. Illustrated by images, when possible and appropriate?:

Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales: 
Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:  SL93 (talk) 13:56, 15 January 2021 (UTC)