# Talk:Museum of Contemporary Art Australia

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 04:38, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Hello all! I'm so pleased to be here and working on this article for a university assignment. Feedback is more than welcome - I want to make the best article possible.
Cheers,
LibraryofEphesus (talk) 02:06, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Museum of Contemporary Art Australia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://archive.is/20130210060631/http://www.worldinteriordesignnetwork.com/news/sydney_museum_of_contemporary_art_to_reopen_in_2012_110526/ to http://www.worldinteriordesignnetwork.com/news/sydney_museum_of_contemporary_art_to_reopen_in_2012_110526/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:36, 9 February 2018 (UTC)

Hi all, I've added a section on the museum's architecture, as it is a key feature of its presence in Circular Quay and Sydney as a whole.
I think it's worth discussing the controvery around the museum's renovation, but I've tried not to dedicate too much unwarranted space to these debates. Many of the top results when searching the musesum are entries into this debate, but a deep-dive into public outcry and architectural merits seems outside the scope of an encyclopedic entry.
I'm open to any other points on this though if anyone believes that more content on this chapter would be appropriate.
Thomasalamander (talk) 09:09, 29 May 2020 (UTC)

Looks good to me! Thanks for your contribution, Thomasalamander. (Also, the article looks ready to be classified as a C by now too - it's obviously way better than a stub.) Laterthanyouthink (talk) 10:24, 29 May 2020 (UTC)

Since LibraryofEphesus hasn't edited in over four months, I am going to implement all those changes I suggested in the peer review myself in the next couple of weeks with the goal of nominating the article for GA afterwards. If anyone has anything to say about this, now is a good time to speak up. Daniel Case (talk) 21:13, 21 October 2021 (UTC)

OK, it's been about six weeks. I have begun with adding some sources. Next comes writing more detailed sections on the building, restructuring the article a bit, and getting rid of the transport section. Daniel Case (talk) 20:00, 9 December 2021 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Museum of Contemporary Art Australia/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: HenryCrun15 (talk · contribs) 05:00, 14 January 2022 (UTC)

I will take on this review. I aim to have completed my review by 20 January. HenryCrun15 (talk) 05:00, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Thank you for the opportunity to review this article. I think it's an excellent article and I'm pleased to have had the chance to read it and work on it. 

Did somebody get out of bed the wrong side this morning, Daniel Case? This edit summary would suggest so. Perhaps you need a reminder of WP:CIVIL. Also, just fyi, WP:BOLDAVOID doesn't say to avoid bolding elsewhere in the first para, and there are many articles where this is used. It allows the reader who has arrived there via the redirect to quickly spot how and why. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 05:13, 27 August 2023 (UTC)

Sorry about that ... I just see that MOS:REDUNDANCY thing way too often and in that situation I thought it would have been especially intuitive not to do it. But I could have expressed it differently.
As for the bolding that deep, I know there's a page somewhere in the MOS that mentions that. You're thinking of WP:ASTONISH. I think, IIRC, the general rule is that if it's important enough to boldface it's important enough to put in the first graf. Daniel Case (talk) 05:22, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
Ah. It's MOS:BOLDREDIRECT: "Terms which redirect to an article or section are commonly bolded when they appear in the first couple of paragraphs of the lead section, or at the beginning of another section" In that case you would have been OK. Sorry again. Daniel Case (talk) 05:25, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
Oh, lastly, I'm not in Australia (though I was in Singapore last week; on the same time zone). I have yet to go to bed tonight. But I will be soon. . Daniel Case (talk) 05:30, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
Okay, no worries! Thanks for the notes. :-) Laterthanyouthink (talk) 06:57, 27 August 2023 (UTC)