# Talk:British Engineerium

This review is transcluded from Talk:British Engineerium/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: ♦ Dr. Blofeld 14:51, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
Starting read through.♦ Dr. Blofeld 14:51, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

Lead
Built in the 1860s. Infobox says completed in 1866, perhaps you should be more precise
→ Changed to "in 1866".
"At its greatest extent, the complex consisted of two boiler houses with condensing engines, a chimney, coal cellars, workshop, cooling pond, leat and underground reservoir" What period was it at its greatest extent?
→ I've added "between 1884 and 1952" (1884 = construction of cooling pond; 1952 = one engine removed from service.)
Should Brighton Water Department and Brighton Water Corporation be wikilinked?
→ I'm not convinced they are notable enough, as minor departments/committees of the local council.
"The Engineerium became nationally famous, and expertise developed by its employees and volunteers was exploited across the world:" Was it genuinely so famous that it was a household name throughout the United Kingdom?
→ I would argue that it was (at least in the industrial history sphere), but it's not really attributable so I have removed it.
Shouldn't the complex (originally named the Brighton and Hove Engineerium before taking its present name in 1981) be mentioned much earlier, right at the beginning?
→ OK – moved to the first sentence.
"For many years, the larger and indigenous exhibits were fully operational and in steam at weekends" Perhaps the word steam should be replaced as it could be taken too literally, or was this intentional?
→ I don't think I added that sentence, but the phrase "in steam" is technically correct.
I would rather see an image of the whole complex in the infobox including the tower a bit like File:British Engineerium Boiler House and Engine Rooms (from Rear).jpg only better quality and less dark. I looked at in on google street maps and think a wider image like that would be more appropriate and recognizable.
History
Should Brighton, Hove and Preston Waterworks Company and Brighton Corporation be wikilinked?
→ Brighton, Hove and Preston Waterworks Company: unsure.  There's not a lot of published info about them.  Brighton Corporation: yes, but to Brighton and Hove City Council (its present incarnation).  I'll have to write that one day!
Wikilink Goldstone Bottom? Also shouldn't the fact it was initially called Goldstone Pumping Station be mentioned at the beginning of the intro. All former names should be mentioned there.♦ Dr. Blofeld 15:11, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
→ G. Bottom: not notable enough on its own, as a minor landscape feature in the city; but if I ever write Topography of Brighton and Hove (which I may do) then I will link it there.  G.P. Station: now mentioned in the last para of the lead.
"truly monumental chimney" looks like POV or OR unless you state described by ... as a "truly monumental chimney"
→ Now changed to described by one historian as "truly monumental", which should be OK as the ref is immediately afterwards.
"A network of arched tunnels was built "  should be were not was.
→ Changed.
Wikilink Henry Abbey?
→ I'm not sure he meets the notability criteria; he was Mayor for one year, and did not have prominence outside B&H.  (Admittedly, the road on which his house still stands was named after him.)
That's OK. Sorry for being over picky on wiki links but we have some surprising articles on some of them but others were not linked. I did wonder if they were notable, you would know better than anybody else here so I trust your judgement on that.♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:15, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
"In October 2010, it was opened for a day ", can you be more precise?
→ Now 10 October 2010, but would that need a ref?
Please.♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:16, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
I would move the lower image on exhibit to the left side of the exhibit section.
→ Do you mean the fire engine?
Yes.♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:16, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

Architecture
"The Engineerium has been described as an "unusually fine asset" for Brighton and Hove[21] and "a splendid example of Victorian industrial engineering" " -needs attribution again
→ Done.
Exhibtitions
Wikilink Crepelle & Grand.
→ Done.
I await for these issues to be addressed before proceeding with the formal checklist.♦ Dr. Blofeld 15:33, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for this initial review.  I have addressed points as above; all comments relate to this timestamp: Hassocks5489 (tickets please!) 16:59, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality: 
B. MoS compliance: 
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources: 
B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary: 
C. No original research: 
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects: 
B. Focused: 
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias: 
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc: 
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales: 
B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions: 
Overall:
Pass or Fail: 
This now, in my judgment, a respectable GA quality article which meets all of the GA criteria. I'm not sure it is ready for FA yet, I do wonder if there are perhaps more sources available either in local library archives which provide valuable information on its function in earlier times or coverage in more books but you've used some ideal books to help you write this which is more than enough for GA. Good job, I'm promoting this.♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:04, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

Just a note to record here that Jonathan Minns, the Engineerium's founder, died earlier this month.  There is biographical info and some general info about the Engineerium in this Argus article.  Hassocks5489 (Floreat Hova!) 11:14, 25 October 2013 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on British Engineerium. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/6Hi1NWv8E?url=http://www.theargus.co.uk/archive/2006/05/11/6812390.Tycoon_s___3_million_museum_deal/?ref=arc to http://www.theargus.co.uk/archive/2006/05/11/6812390.Tycoon_s___3_million_museum_deal/?ref=arc
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:44, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

Some useful details here  Hassocks5489 (Floreat Hova!) 13:03, 9 August 2024 (UTC)