# Talk:I Wanna Be Bad

This commercial also aired for a short time in Massachusetts television markets when Six Flags New England opened back in 2000

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on I Wanna Be Bad. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110927054913/http://www.gradewinner.com/p/articles/mi_m0IBX/is_1_8/ai_78052876 to http://www.gradewinner.com/p/articles/mi_m0IBX/is_1_8/ai_78052876
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:28, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:I Wanna Be Bad/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: K. Peake (talk · contribs) 09:57, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

My first review for you in a good amount of time, coming soon! --K. Peake 09:57, 26 January 2022 (UTC)


### Infobox and lead
Replace hlist with bullet points per Template:Infobox song
Pipe Jackson, New Jersey to Jackson Township, New Jersey
After stating the song is by Willa Ford, mention it is "from her first studio album, Willa Was Here (2001)."
The part about Royce da 5'9" should be the second sentence of the lead instead
"who also produced the track," → "who both handled the production,"
Remove "21 years at the time" because that's a bit excessive for the lead
"refused, decided to create" → "refused, deciding to create"
"and included it on Ford's first album," → "and went forward with release." per the body
"The single version of the track features" → "The song features a guest appearance from"
Remove pipe on rapper
The single release sentence should come directly after the Jason Flom one
""I Wanna Be Bad" had Ford explaining" → "it has Ford explaining"
The part about going against influences does not appear to be sourced
I'm including this info from the Critical reception and Legacy section, particularly this source, where Ford talks about why the LGBTQ+ community likes the song. ResPM (T🔈🎵C) 11:58, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
"as Ford's debut single on April 24, 2001." → "as Ford's debut single and the lead one from the album on April 24, 2001." with the pipe
Billboard Hot 100 should be wikilinked to itself, then pipe Billboard to the magazine's article on the second mention here
"the single reached number 22" → "it reached number 22"
"The track also charted in" → "The song also charted in"
"has embraced the song and" → "has embraced it and" plus this should be the last sentence of the para instead
Wikilink music video
"by Chris Applebaum where" → "by Chris Applebaum, where"


### Background and content
Retitle to Background and composition
Audio sample looks good!
"who had been signed to" → "who was signed to"
"against the label's" → "going against the label's"
Wikilink pre-chorus per MOS:LINK2SECT
"wrote her own songs." → "wrote her own material." to be less repetitive
Pipe Jackson, New Jersey to Jackson Township, New Jersey
Are you sure there isn't more info to add about the comp, such as any instrumentation?
I've added as much as I could, but pop music isn't exactly known for its theatrical composition. ResPM (T🔈🎵C) 12:11, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
"a woman," and she" → "a woman", and she" per MOS:QUOTE
"along with her partner" → "along with him"
Haha, as a member of LGBTQ+ myself, you can never be too sure 😏. ResPM (T🔈🎵C) 12:11, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
"features Royce da 5'9" while" → "features Royce da 5'9", while"


### Release and promotion
Wikilink music video on the img text
Add the word stations at the end of the radio sentence
"appreciating its divergence" → "appreciating the divergence"
Amazon source does not display May 22 release date, unless I missed something?
Go to the source and click on "See all 5 formats and editions". ResPM (T🔈🎵C) 12:47, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Pipe Maxi-CD to CD maxi per MOS:LINK2SECT
"on Ford's debut album," → "on Ford's debut studio album"
"criticizing Ford and her split from Carter." → "criticizing her and the breakup."
Wikilink music video
Where does [1] mention the cop(s) being in the backseat?
Hmm. I'm not sure how to reword this without causing confusion (e.g. if she kidnapped the officers, why couldn't they physically stop her if they were in the car with her?), so I'm going to source the timestamp for this one. At 2:42, you can see the officers in the backseat. It's a blink-and-you'll-miss-it moment. ResPM (T🔈🎵C) 12:47, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Add some more info to prose about the video other than a summary, like the doughnut incident
I had to cite the video again, but what I've added is basically all there is to it. It's not exactly a James Cameron movie. ResPM (T🔈🎵C) 12:47, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Wikilink airplay
Should the hyperlink sentence start with on Willa Was Here or in the booklet of Willa Was Here?
"in an ad campaign" → "in an advertising campaign"


### Reception and legacy
"by comparison" is not needed after the modest part since that is implied
"noted that it was the only track on the album that was" → "noted how it is the only track on the album that is"
Remove the 2017 Billboard interview context since you have already introduced this interview earlier on
Remove double speech marks around honest because this is an encyclopedic term


#### Commercial performance
Pipe Billboard Hot 100 to Billboard Hot 100
"rose to its peak" → "rose to a peak"
"The song was a" → "It was a"
Add an as of date for the 250,000 copies
The source doesn't mention a date, and archives of the source only go back to 2008, so it may or may not be outdated. ResPM (T🔈🎵C) 12:55, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
"Worldwide, "I Wanna Be Bad"" → "Elsewhere, "I Wanna Be Bad"" and identify the ARIA Singles Chart after the position


### Track listings
Wikilink Mike Rizzo
If the Australian CD uses Rizzo's full name too, then change to this because it is a separate track listing from the previous
 Done. ResPM (T🔈🎵C) 12:58, 27 January 2022 (UTC)


### Credits and personnel
Studios → Recording
Pipe Jackson, New Jersey to Jackson Township, New Jersey
Use {{spaced ndash}} so there is the right space between credits and personnel
Wikilink Brian Kierulf
Wikilink Royce Da 5'9"
 Done. ResPM (T🔈🎵C) 13:02, 27 January 2022 (UTC)


### Charts
Pipe Dance Singles Sales to Dance/Electronic Singles Sales
I can't do that since it's part of the template. ResPM (T🔈🎵C) 13:03, 27 January 2022 (UTC)


### Release history
Good


### References
Copyvio score looks superb at 13.0%!!!
I don't see a real team on Gazette Review's about page or anything else that indicates reliability, so what makes ref 7 a usable source?
I don't recall seeing it listed on WP:RSP, but the "About Us" subsection established enough credibility for me since it's a legitimate job site and not a user-generated site where anyone can log in and edit, so I'd assume a site like this has editorial oversight. Willa's name is misspelled as "Will" a few times, but I've made that mistake several times before as, so I'm not sure what to think about this. ResPM (T🔈🎵C) 13:35, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
I have my doubts about findarticles.com being a reliable source for ref 8, or can you justify it?
It looks like a reposting of an August 2001 article from Girls Life magazine. I've checked several archives but couldn't find the original piece, so I added the original work to the citation and moved findarticles.com to a via parameter. ResPM (T🔈🎵C) 13:35, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
WP:OVERLINK of Radio & Records on ref 10
Remove or replace ref 25 since anyone can edit AllMusic listings, making it unreliable for charts
Fix MOS:QWQ issues with ref 28


### Final comments and verdict
 On hold until all of the issues are fixed; that did not take long at all! --K. Peake 10:48, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
@Kyle Peake: I've completed the initial edits. Please respond to my comments where necessary, especially those in the References section, as if both Gazette Review and Girls' Life (via findarticles.com) are bad sources, a lot of information will be getting thrown in the dumpster. ResPM (T🔈🎵C) 13:38, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
ResolutionsPerMinute Thanks for a quick and dedicated response; I have struck out any disagreements we had where a compromise was able to be reached! I am fine with ref 8 now you've explained findarticles.com is really a via domain, however anyone can send in a form for Gazette Reviews, meaning writers aren't necessarily professional, and RSP even says just because a source is not listed there doesn't mean it's reliable... anything else to justify this source's reliability? Regarding the as of date request, maybe 2007 would work because the archive says copyright 2007 at the bottom? --K. Peake 22:00, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
@Kyle Peake: Okay, I've changed the year and removed the Gazette Review along with any information that was stated in it. Not a lot, thankfully. It looks like I'm all done here, but please point out if I missed something. And thank you for taking the time to review this article. ResPM (T🔈🎵C) 22:25, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
 Pass now, good thing the detrimental source wasn't removed! --K. Peake 07:51, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

I've noticed that in a Hollywood Reporter icon she is described as an icon, but i feel like that's a really vague term that seems to mean nothing. She had one song that cracked a hit? I know it means things to certain generation and audience but the term "icon" seems so vague and isn't explained I don't feel like it warrants being here without some further detail as it feels a bit MOS:PEACOCK-ish to me. Andrzejbanas (talk) 18:17, 28 January 2022 (UTC)