# Talk:Doki Doki Literature Club!

Should there be a list of characters in DDLC article? 184.155.146.26 (talk) 01:51, 1 January 2019 (UTC)

Yes, there should be a list of the characters in DDLC, which should include the protagonist character as well. Morphine2 (talk) 23:15, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
The characters are not notable enough outside of the context of the narrative to justify any more coverage than what is already included in the article. Cat's Tuxedo (talk) 17:28, 20 April 2019 (UTC)

So this news article popped up from Chicagoland: Gary middle school issues warning about popular online game. Should there be text added concerning that the game may cause suicidal tendencies? FunksBrother (talk) 17:28, 9 February 2019 (UTC)

The text should be included either in the reception column or a separate one titled “Controversies”. Morphine2 (talk) 23:17, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
The issue is not widespread enough to be worthy of note. A single middle school's memo doesn't cut it. Cat's Tuxedo (talk) 17:28, 20 April 2019 (UTC)

Monika appears and apologizes to the protagonist for the "boring" weekend he had spent, and begins a display of compensation -- The word "compensation" makes no sense here. Should it be "compassion"? 109.246.123.214 (talk) 16:33, 3 May 2019 (UTC)

"Compensation" means "making up for something", which makes perfect sense in this context. Cat's Tuxedo (talk) 17:06, 3 May 2019 (UTC)

ref:  Kagefumi  https://ddlcwiki.net/wiki/Kagefum
Initially handed assignment, personal reasons caused a replacement artist assigned.
https://doki-doki-literature-club.fandom.com/wiki/Satchely
https://www.deviantart.com/satchely/journal/Free-Game-Release-Doki-Doki-Literature-Club-705810669
106.71.241.36 (talk) 02:44, 30 May 2019 (UTC) I never saved a password; in fact I'm not sure what screen name I used, maybe novista. I'm not game to mess with the article itself.TY. Update: now Xae-chan registered, before that did the edit request— Preceding unsigned comment added by Xae-chan (talk • contribs) 01:39, 1 June 2019 (UTC)

Unfortunately the sources you're linking aren't considered reliable by Wikipedia standards. However, for what it's worth, Satchely and Velinquent are credited for character art and background art respectively in the ingame credits, while Kagefumi is listed in the "special thanks" section.  CurlyWi (talk) 02:27, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
Appears that the artist data was changed on April 1 2019 .  Satchely is Credited as ″Character Art″ on both  and .  Velinquent is credited as background art in those same two sources.
Request is to update  	
"artist = Kagefumi, VelinquenT "
to 
"artist = Satchely, VelinquenT "
2406:E006:400F:EE01:C8C5:2B03:8C7F:7B3F (talk) 07:56, 2 June 2019 (UTC)

The artist entry for Kagefumi is incorrect Satchel (on Twitter) was the final artist. When I discovered the entry, I messaged her and came to see what to do. 
Here is the source info:
The Concept Art Booklet in DDLC Fan Pack
After Dave, another amazing artist by the name of Kagefumi was briefly involved with development for a couple months. She helped further set the character designs in stone. She was originally going to illustrate the entire game, but unrelated personal difficulties resulted in her having to step down. 
The Final Sprites
After Satchely came on board, the sprites progressed fairly quickly. I first had her sketch all the sprite poses so that I could finally update my in-game placeholders to something that would be closer to the final art. 106.71.241.36 (talk) 01:08, 1 June 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. NiciVampireHeart 22:05, 1 June 2019 (UTC)

Lately Satchely’s artist credit has been repeatedly removed from the article, despite the fact that she is the one that drew the character sprites and other related art for the game. To reaffirm, Satchely and VelinquenT are the character and background artists for Doki Doki Literature Club. Kagefumi was originally going to be an artist for the game but dropped out early on due to problems, according to info in the official DDLC fan pack. I would like to ask why Satchely’s credit is being removed for seemingly no apparent reason. MaRoFu (talk) 14:18, 2 June 2019 (UTC)

Scrat987 (talk) 12:48, 20 June 2019 (UTC) A sequel is now in development, Under the name Project Libitina.

 Not done I can see in forums and social media that there's talk of a sequel but we need a reliable source to confirm, of which I don't see any from a first-pass search. --Masem (t) 13:37, 20 June 2019 (UTC)

I added a section towards the end which features the track listing, along with some information regarding the soundrack. VirreFriberg (talk) 20:51, 22 August 2020 (UTC)

A few things to clarify: Per MOS:VG, unless the soundtrack is licensed music, we do not include the tracklist (the individual track names mean little to non-game players). Also, the cover art for the soundtrack is unnecessarily duplicative of the game's art, and thus not appropriate to include per NFCC#3 and #8. Otherwise the section is fine to mention the soundtrack release. --Masem (t) 21:11, 22 August 2020 (UTC)

I see no reason why this shouldn't be included in this category. Similar to other "fad trending games" (FNAF, Among Us, Fall Guys etc), a lot of notable and popular YouTubers played DDLC (e.g. PewDiePie, Markiplier and Jacksepticeye). DDLC's popularity online was a trend. Yes, it still has a fanbase and active subreddit, but the FNAF fanbase is also still active (Dawko still mnakes FNAF content which gets hundreds of thousands of viewws), and yet that's still in the fads and trends category. DDLC's popularity when it was trending isn't any different, so it should remain in "2010s fads and trends".
I don't want to have an edit war though, so I thought I'd discuss this here instead.
--ThisIsSparta2007 (talk) 12:39, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

Personal observations aren't enough. There needs to be explicit sourcing that defines this property as having been a past fad or trend. Cat's Tuxedo (talk) 18:18, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
Where's the explicit sourcing on the FNAF page? Or the Among Us page? Or the Fall Guys page? ThisIsSparta2007 (talk) 18:52, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
If there's no sourcing for those either, they should be removed too. Cat's Tuxedo (talk) 21:03, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

diff A
diff B
According to those diffs, correction has been made but not finished. I mainly contribute to zh-cn so if anyone would like to finish this correction I would be greatful.
Source:
Tweet from Satchely - 1
Tweet from Satchely - 2
(Someone said that tweet isn't an authentic source so here you are)
Team page from Official site
”After Satchely came on board, the sprites progressed fairly quickly.“

EL File4138 (talk) 02:35, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

Change "Salvato then handed visual development over to Kagefumi, who created the final versions of the characters, their sprites, and the background images over the course of a few months." to "Salvato then handed visual development over to Kagefumi, who created the initial versions of the characters, then subsequently to Satchel, who created the final editions of their sprites."
Source: Salvato, Dan (2017) Doki Doki Literature Club! Concept Art Booklet, p. 12 JasonDaemon24 (talk) 04:41, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

 Already done. ◢  Ganbaruby!  (Say hi!) 02:55, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Monika has garnered a lot of attention from the fanbase, so can we create an article for her? Dangervest69 (talk) 05:26, 30 January 2023 (UTC)

The character doesn't have enough independent coverage from reliable secondary sources to warrant an individual article, so no. Cat's Tuxedo (talk) 06:48, 30 January 2023 (UTC)

It seems odd that for a game that is intentionally trying to parody a visual novel, the screenshot shown doesn't give the game an accurate idea of how its played.Blue Pumpkin Pie (talk) 06:32, 17 May 2023 (UTC)

@Blue Pumpkin Pie: Just updated the image to something more adequate. Cat's Tuxedo (talk) 23:26, 17 May 2023 (UTC)

I'm just gonna post something here to vent my frustration.
So, I wanted to add the "A little bit of Monika" meme from YouTube right? The meme was mostly only prevalent on YouTube so it's basically the only place I could have cited from. Nope, YouTube isn't a reliable source (even for meme for some reason). Fine I went looking and the only places I found outside of YouTube were:

Soundcluoud. Didn't work, fair enough, it's very similar to YouTube.
Know Your Meme.
Know Your Meme wasn't trustworthy because it was a user generated website?! Wha- WHAT?! Wikipedia is a user generated website what kind of hypocritical logic is this?!?!!?
I don't know why I'm getting so mad about this, it shouldn't matter yet I feel so F***ING mad about it! The Mining Pickaxe (talk) 12:26, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

While our content is user generated, we want to only include material that has been reported by reliable independent sources such that we don't gather a bunch of trivia and fancruft to our topic.. That is, we are not TVTropes where that type of content is more widely accepted. We are trying to be an educational reference, so aspects like memes or popular fan creations rarely get covered by us unless a more mainstream source covers it. Masem (t) 13:12, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

This is probably one of the only video game articles on Wikipedia that identifies each character with its own article. I'm not trying to get them removed, i'm just saying thats cool as hell. NikolaiVektovich (talk) 04:22, 6 July 2024 (UTC)

The redirect I Gently Open the Door has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 January 21 § I Gently Open the Door until a consensus is reached.  Utopes (talk / cont) 05:06, 21 January 2025 (UTC)