# Talk:Justice League Heroes: The Flash

Image:JusticeLeagueFlashCover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 06:17, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Justice League Heroes: The Flash. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110605075428/http://www.gamefaqs.com/gba/933902-justice-league-heroes-the-flash/data to http://www.gamefaqs.com/gba/933902-justice-league-heroes-the-flash/data
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:17, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Justice League Heroes: The Flash/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: Cat's Tuxedo (talk · contribs) 08:45, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
Reviewer: Pokelego999 (talk · contribs) 16:34, 18 July 2025 (UTC)

Taking this one on because this looks like a fun little article. Will leave comments soon. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 16:34, 18 July 2025 (UTC)


### Six GA Criteria
1. Article is well-written. Very minimal mistakes if any at all.
2. No OR, all info is cited in the article.
3. Coverage is broad in depth and focus. Shows multiple aspects of the game.
4. Article appears neutral, and does not appear to hold a significantly negative nor positive stance on the subject.
5. Article appears stable. Does not appear to have had any major vandalism occur.
6. Article uses two fair use images with proper rationale. 


### Lead
-Just to clarify; is the Flash in the game specified to specifically be the Wally West incarnation? Given multiple Flash incarnations use the same costume, I figured I'd at least clarify to make sure the hyperlink is accurate.

Yes, the manual for the console version identifies this Flash as Wally West. A reference citing this information has just been added. Cat's Tuxedo (talk) 03:05, 20 July 2025 (UTC)
-I'm not sure the level of commentary in reception justifies the mention of "comic-inspired presentation" given only critic mentions it specifically.

Removed. Cat's Tuxedo (talk) 03:05, 20 July 2025 (UTC)
-Could you clarify what the "basic mechanics" are?

Fixed. Cat's Tuxedo (talk) 03:05, 20 July 2025 (UTC)


### Plot
-Looks good. 


### Gameplay
-Perhaps specify the gameplay is made for the Game Boy Advance? Buttons like the right shoulder button are gonna be confusing to someone who isn't familiar with the original hardware; I'd suggest including an image of the GBA somewhere as well if possible, whether it be here or the dev section. 

I seem to have neglected to clarify that the game is for the Game Boy Advance in the article's lead as I should have. Just fixed that. Cat's Tuxedo (talk) 03:05, 20 July 2025 (UTC)


### Development and release
-Looks good. 


### Reception
-There's a few phrases in here, like "slick" or "blending into the crowd of GBA beat 'em ups" feel very opinionated, even if they're citing a reviewer. Would it be possible to reword them to more neutral language that still conveys the writers' thoughts? 

Fixed. Cat's Tuxedo (talk) 03:05, 20 July 2025 (UTC)
-Could you clarify what an "isometric viewpoint" is? 

Linked to "Isometric video game graphics" as I previously had in the gameplay section. Cat's Tuxedo (talk) 03:05, 20 July 2025 (UTC)
-"with boss battles being particularly engaging due to their multiple attack patterns and strategic demands" strategic demands like what?

Fixed. Cat's Tuxedo (talk) 03:05, 20 July 2025 (UTC)


### Spotcheck
Spotchecked 3, 5, and 6. 6 does not specify that the game released in the fourth quarter. I also can't find mention of the enemies being similar. I'd also be careful with quoting from 6 unless you're fluent in French given the exact meaning a word may be lost via machine translation.

The archived version does list the European release date, so I changed the url status to "dead" to make that information more easily accessible. And the penultimate sentence in the review, "Flash a tout du petit jeu sans réel intérêt, ni réel défaut d'ailleurs quand on y pense, on y joue sans vraiment s'en rendre compte, réalisant seulement au bout d'un heure qu'on passe son temps à répéter les deux mêmes attaques sur des ennemis qui, malgré leur changement de forme, sont tous très similaires.", translates to "Flash has all the hallmarks of a small game without any real interest, nor real flaws for that matter when you think about it, you play it without really realizing it, realizing only after an hour that you spend your time repeating the same two attacks on enemies who, despite their change of form, are all very similar." Cat's Tuxedo (talk) 03:05, 20 July 2025 (UTC)


### Overall
@Cat's Tuxedo: Looking pretty solid overall. Address the above and you should be good to go. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 01:20, 20 July 2025 (UTC)

All points have been addressed. Cat's Tuxedo (talk) 03:05, 20 July 2025 (UTC)
@Cat's Tuxedo looks good, happy to pass.  Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 03:14, 20 July 2025 (UTC)