# Talk:K-23 (Kansas highway)

This review is transcluded from Talk:K-23 (Kansas highway)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Floydian (talk · contribs) 07:06, 15 November 2020 (UTC)

Hello I am Floydian and I will be your waiter on this fine occasion. I've listed my concerns below, which you can chose to respond to individually, or as a group at the bottom. Overall the article is in great shape, and I only have a few issues and suggestions for your attention. Cheers, Floydian τ ¢ 07:06, 15 November 2020 (UTC)


### Prose review
Lede
"By Grainfield, the section that follows old US-40 is the former Golden Belt. A section from Hoxie southward along K-23 follows the former Roosevelt National Highway. Farther north in Hoxie, it crosses the former Kansas White Way and former Blue Line" - The Golden Belt, Kansas White Way and former Blue Line aren't explained or given much context. These three sentences are repeated verbatim in the History section, so perhaps that is the better to place to expand a little on what they are.
-- Floydian τ ¢ 07:06, 15 November 2020 (UTC)
RD

-- Floydian τ ¢ 07:06, 15 November 2020 (UTC)
History

-- Floydian τ ¢ 07:06, 15 November 2020 (UTC)
Junction list
Y - Looks good
-- Floydian τ ¢ 07:06, 15 November 2020 (UTC)


### Source review
-- Floydian τ ¢ 07:06, 15 November 2020 (UTC)


### Image review
-- Floydian τ ¢ 07:06, 15 November 2020 (UTC)


### The actual GA checklist
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
Passed  - Exceeds GA criteria
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, spelling, and grammar):  b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): 
Grammar issues resolved above
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):  d (copyvio and plagiarism): 
Excellent referencing
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 
Covers the route and its history comprehensively and succinctly
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 

It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 
Images are all properly licenced
Overall:
Pass/Fail: 

I am passing the article at this point. All my concerns have been addressed. Good work! - Floydian τ ¢ 20:20, 15 November 2020 (UTC)