# Talk:Marvel Swimsuit Special

This review is transcluded from Talk:Marvel Swimsuit Special/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Kingsif (talk · contribs) 03:28, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Starting review Kingsif (talk) 03:28, 27 October 2019 (UTC)

@Kingsif: Hi, just wanted to inquire about the status of this review. Do you know when you'll be able to continue? Morgan695 (talk) 16:12, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
@Morgan695: When I remember I didn't finish it - I had it on a watch so it wouldn't have been much longer, but thanks for the ping! Pasted review below, sorry for the wait! Kingsif (talk) 16:33, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
@Kingsif: Hi, edits have been made. Morgan695 (talk) 19:24, 3 November 2019 (UTC)


### Style
Lead could be a little longer, based on the overall length of the article
Development section written well - fluid and nice
Need a ref for "parody advertisements and fake interviews" sentence - I checked sources so I imagine it's in one of the nearby refs, but for ease, this warrants one at the end.
Not sure the Marvel Swimsuit Special #1 description should be presented as an 'e.g.' Perhaps replace as "One was the Marvel Swimsuit Special #1, which is set..." - or similar.
Coming off this, see coverage comment
Reception section good
Revivals section good
Needs attention one little thing


### Coverage
Lead gives good coverage
Good coverage of development
May need some more coverage in Content, specifically having descriptions of the other comics as well as Marvel Swimsuit Special #1.
Good coverage of reception; perhaps a bit light on critics (only 4, though the series was prolific) but seems representative enough
Seems to use all available info about revivals
Needs attention one little thing


### Illustration
Good use of table
Good idea to illustrate gender equality; good selection of appropriate images for it
Pass


### Verifiability
Sources look good
Slight concern over Comicbook.com, but it seems reliable for what it is being used to source
Pass


### Stability
History squeaky clean
Pass


### Neutrality
Looks clear
Pass


### Copyright
Check looks clean
All images fair use, with solid reasoning for each
Pass


### Overall
on hold - see notes. Very close, just a few little things. Kingsif (talk) 16:33, 3 November 2019 (UTC)

 Nice work! Kingsif (talk) 21:03, 3 November 2019 (UTC)