# Talk:Cyber Sunday (2007)

Yes Batista did do two Batista Bombs, but then went for a pin and Undertaker kicked out. Batista 1 Batista Bomb and then got the win [1]. It should not say he pinned Undertaker after 2 Batista Bombs, it should say he won after a Batista Bomb. TJ Spyke 00:36, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

This does not matter. It was still two consecutive finishers. Batista didn't win after one powerbomb, he won after TWO. --Maestro25 06:23, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
I explained this on an IP's talkpage. I will use an analagy to make this simple. You know the 1UP trick in certain Mario games? If you jump on two enemies and then miss, the count is reset. The same thing happens here; when Batista went for the pinfall attempt, that "reset" it. He did NOT hit two consecutive Batista Bombs. He hit 1 went for a pin, then went for another Batista Bomb. TJ Spyke 06:27, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
Lets comprimise. We write after two batista bombs and add a subnote saying he went for the pin on the first one.(not in those exact words.)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Masterman4 (talk • contribs) 20:59, 6 November 2007 (UTC) 

But that's not accurate. The whole point is to list the move used to win the match. The first Batista Bomb did not do that since he went for a pinfall attempt and failed. If he had used the 2 Batista Bombs in a row, that would be different. TJ Spyke 00:06, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
What about edges spears back at new years rev.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Masterman4 (talk • contribs) 22:22, 8 November 2007 (UTC) 
If that's how it's always been, why did it used to say (I just went and changed it) that Rock beat Austin at WM19 with 3 Rock Bottoms, and Edge beat Cena with 2 spears at NYR06?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.110.23.67 (talk) 23:39, 8 November 2007 (UTC) 

Because Rock did 3 Rock Bottoms in a row, he didn't go for pins in-between. Edge did, and has not been changed as well to say one. TJ Spyke 01:52, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
Rock did go for pins in between each one. See? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-vobf2eNwgw The Undertaker/Kane match at WrestleMania 14 is the same way in it's article, listing 3 Tombstones despite pins in between them all. Man, for something that's ALWAYS been done this way, there sure are quite a few that haven't been done this way, when you'd think they would. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.110.23.67 (talk) 18:45, 10 November 2007 (UTC) 

There are several issues that still need to be addressed before this article is ready to be a Good Article candidate. Please provide reliable third party sourcing (something other than WWE.com), add to the aftermath section, and wait for the article to stabilize. Once these concerns are addressed, please leave a note a WPT:PW that you feel the article is ready to be nominated. Wait one week for the members of the Wrestling WikiProject to help copyedit and look over the article. Then, if nobody opposes, the article can be nominated. Thanks. Nikki311 20:41, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

I've copyedited the article, but here are a few more suggestions:

"He was not seen on WWE television since" - it isn't clear who.
Another person needs to fix the writing, as I don't think it is up to GA standards. It is far too informal in some areas.
The infobox image is not low resolution.
Hope that helps. Nikki311 03:45, 27 June 2008 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Cyber Sunday (2007)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

All of your concerns have been addressed. -- iMatthew T.C. 02:02, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

Looks good. Though, the article is still overlinked. Consensus at a Wikiproject cannot overrule over Wikipedia policy. Until that is addressed in someway, I cannot pass the article.SRX 02:10, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
It doesn't matter what the consensus is in a project, you have to abide by the Manual of Style. See here. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:33, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
Well in this case, I would have thought that IAR might apply, but instead of bothering, I've completed your request. Cheers, -- iMatthew T.C. 11:41, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
Great.  Pass--SRX 03:27, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

Are you sure thats Candice Michelle? MC Steel (talk) 04:18, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Cyber Sunday (2007). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140414211510/http://corporate.wwe.com/news/documents/4Q2007pressrelease.pdf to http://corporate.wwe.com/news/documents/4Q2007pressrelease.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:55, 12 May 2017 (UTC)