# Talk:Horn shark

This review is transcluded from Talk:Horn shark/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Hi, I am reviewing this article for GA and have made a few copy editing changes which you are free to revert where I have changed the meaning. This is a wonderfully informative article. 
GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): Clearly written  b (MoS): Follows required MoS elements 

It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): Well referenced  b (citations to reliable sources): Sources are reliable  c (OR): No OR 

It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): Cover the major areas  b (focused): Remains focused on the topic 

It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: Neutral 

It is stable.
No edit wars etc.: Stable 

It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 

Overall:
Pass/Fail: Pass 

Congratulations!
—Mattisse (Talk) 21:33, 23 June 2009 (UTC)