# Talk:HMS Hasty (H24)

This review is transcluded from Talk:HMS Hasty (H24)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: SMasters (talk) 08:51, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose):  b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): 
There were numerous punctuation issues but I have fixed them. Otherwise, the article is well written and complies to MOS requirements.
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 
Article is properly referenced with reliable sources and has no original research.
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 
Article covers all major aslects and is focused.
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 
Article complies to WP:NPOV.
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 
Article is stable.
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 
Images are correctly tagged.
Overall: Aside from some minor punctuation issues (if you can't read a whole sentence without running out of breath, you need a comma somewhere!), which I have fixed, the article complies to all the requirements for a GA, and I am happy to pass it. – SMasters (talk) 09:13, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
Pass/Fail: