# Talk:Everybody Hates Hugo

Shouldn't this stay at Everybody Hates Hugo, considering nothing else has that name? --SilvaStorm

There is a discussion about this issue at Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (television)#RfC Episode Article Naming conventions, please join in. I have moved the rename template onto the talk page as the template said it should be located there, hope that is Ok.--Opark 77 19:05, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
Nah, it's correctly named per the Lost ep. gudielines. thanks/Fenton, Matthew Lexic Dark 52278 Alpha 771 22:09, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
Added to the dream sequence how Jin spoke in English and Hurley replied in Korean--Miconis 01:27, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

The dream sequence is mentioned as "At one point" somewhere in the middle of the plot summary, even though it's the opening scene of the episode.--87.164.116.76 (talk) 12:33, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

Image:EverybodyHatesHugo LOST.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 21:20, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Everybody Hates Hugo/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Hello, I'll review this article according to WP:WIAGA. My reviews tend to be more peer-reviewy than necessary, but I try to help increase the quality of GAs a notch before giving it the green plus. Most (all?) of the points should be easily fixable.

Intro section: the information about the "raft" may need more information (a few words) for context
Done --Mr.crabby ''''' (Talk) 18:14, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
"flashbacks reveal why Hurley is hesitant at his new job of distibuting food" - add "in the newly discovered Swan station", because it could also be misinterpreted as "why Hurley is hesitant at his new job of distributing food [at the fast food restaurant]" - there is also a typo
Done and Done --Mr.crabby ''''' (Talk) 18:14, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
Plot section: "Johnny pulls into a local gas station, to buy some beer" - comma wrong
Done --Mr.crabby ''''' (Talk) 18:14, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
"At the hatch, Hurley struggles..." - make it clear that it is no longer in the flashback, e.g. write "At the hatch on the island, Hurley struggles..."
Instead I wrote "In present time at the hatch" because I thought that sounded a little better. Tell me what you think --Mr.crabby ''''' (Talk) 18:14, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
"won't" -> "will not" per Wikipedia:MOS#Avoid contractions
Done --Mr.crabby ''''' (Talk) 18:14, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
"Hurley then prepares to blow up the food with dynamite" - isn't it more like that he tried to blow up the pantry?
Changed --Mr.crabby ''''' (Talk) 18:14, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
This is more an advice for FACs, but in general, there is still some detail and redundance that can be trimmed in the plot section, like "Johnny pulls into a local gas station, to buy some beer, and notices news crews talking to the attendant. The reporters have arrived because they know the winning lottery ticket was bought there; the clerk recognizes Hurley and points him out. Johnny is stunned, and his expression clearly reveals that, despite his promise, everything has changed." -> "Johnny pulls into a local gas station to buy some beer, but notices news crews talking to the attendant. When the clerk loudly points out Hurley as the buyer of the winning lottery ticket, Johnny's stunned expression clearly reveals that, despite his promise, everything has changed."
Done --Mr.crabby ''''' (Talk) 18:14, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
Production section: "Orginally Libby had been written" - typo
Corrected --Mr.crabby ''''' (Talk) 18:14, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
"and was going to be played by Jennifer Jason Leigh" - is there a reason why JJL did not play Libby in the end?
I will research that --Mr.crabby ''''' (Talk) 18:14, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
Update:I did some research and it looks like a read the source wrong. JJL was approached by the producers to play the part, but declined. --Mr.crabby ''''' (Talk) 18:21, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
"After after take of Hurley eating food in the hatch" -> ??? ("Take after take?")
Changed to "After each take of Hurley eating food in the hatch" --Mr.crabby ''''' (Talk) 18:14, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
"while Bose delievered his lines" - typo
Fixed --Mr.crabby ''''' (Talk) 18:14, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
Reception section: "in key 18–49 demographic" - may be missing a "the"
Alright --Mr.crabby ''''' (Talk) 18:14, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
"The episode achieved a 9.4/22 in key 18–49 demographic. The 9.4 rating refers to 9.4% of all 18–49 years olds, and the 22 share refers to 8% of all 18–49 year olds watching television at the time of the broadcast." - sentence can probably be combined without making the explanation that obvious
Done and done --Mr.crabby ''''' (Talk) 18:14, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
"Hurley's backhround" - typo
Fixed --Mr.crabby ''''' (Talk) 18:14, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
References: some references are missing the publisher. Please note that Lostpedia is generally pushing WP:RS a bit, and you should replace these links with the original sources of information where possible, leaving Lostpedia only as a convenience link, not the source itself.
I added publishers for references two and four so now that should be covered. With regard to the Lostpedia thing, would you rather me change ref 4 to a link of the audio podcast? Ref 5 was an interview done by Lostpedia and is not available anywhere else. Tell me what you think. --Mr.crabby ''''' (Talk) 18:14, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
I'd say link to the ABC podcast page and mention the podcast date; the people who want to learn what was said in an old podcast that's offline now, will find a way. The Lostpedia interview shouldn't be a problem, but it may be better to link to a original static version in the page history than to the editable version (I don't know the wikipedia procedure, but Lostpedia also has some occasional vandalism).
Images: The infobox image and the Libby image are fine, but I think the non-free image in the plot section is purely decorative and therefore doesn't pass WP:NFCC#1 in my eyes.
Removed --Mr.crabby ''''' (Talk) 18:14, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
I can't detect anything wrong otherwise (broadness, stability, neutrality); the article is in a pretty good shape already. You have seven days to address the points above (I won't mind if you ignore some points as you see fit). I'll have this page on my watchlist, so just say here when you think you're finished. – sgeureka t•c 17:08, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

Well, the article easily passes as a GA now; other improvements like the one podcast link can be performed through normal editing. Give me a few minutes to do the bureaucracy. – sgeureka t•c 19:09, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
Alright thanks --Mr.crabby ''''' (Talk) 19:37, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

The van stalled when it was being pushed? A little odd surely.
The "replacement food" - trivia too far? That's fairly normal film making stuff.
Rich Farmbrough, 00:22, 5 March 2011 (UTC).

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted.
Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia.
This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link.
If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting.
If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page.
If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request it's removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta.
When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags.
The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true.
Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.
Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

http://www.lostpedia.com/wiki/Official_Lost_Podcast_transcript/November_21,_2005
Triggered by \blostpedia\.com\b on the global blacklist
http://www.lostpedia.com/wiki/The_Lostpedia_Interview:Raj_K._Bose
Triggered by \blostpedia\.com\b on the global blacklist
If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.
From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 17:59, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
 Resolved This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag, if not already done.  No further action is necessary.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 00:07, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Everybody Hates Hugo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20061029073215/http://www.lost-media.com/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=1071 to http://lost-media.com/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=1071
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 04:16, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Everybody Hates Hugo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111006003123/http://abc.go.com/shows/lost/episode-detail/everybody-hates-hugo/40659 to http://abc.go.com/shows/lost/episode-detail/everybody-hates-hugo/40659
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:32, 18 June 2017 (UTC)