# Talk:Oak Lawn (Washington, D.C.)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Oak Lawn (Washington, D.C.)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: REDMAN 2019 (talk · contribs) 13:16, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
I'll take a look at this one. REDMAN 2019 (talk) 13:16, 4 December 2020 (UTC)


### 17th-19th centuries
Ref 1 needs a author.
Ref 2 has no url.
Except for the last sentence, the third paragraph is entirely unsourced.


### 20th-21st centuries
The second paragraph also is unsourced except for the last sentence
Ref 14, 27, 28 and 29 have no urls or accessdates.


### Main article
There are quite a few sentences with 4, 5 or even 6 references. Per WP:SYNTH it's best just to have one, two at max.


### Comments
There are a few issues to be addressed here, mainly with the sourcing. So I'm putting this on hold for now. REDMAN 2019 (talk) 12:40, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

Ok, I think the issues have been corrected. Take a look when you get a chance. Thank you. APK whisper in my ear 06:10, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
Well done. In my opinion this article now meets GA criteria. Passing. REDMAN 2019 (talk) 12:15, 7 December 2020 (UTC)