# Talk:HMS Fortune (H70)

This review is transcluded from Talk:HMS Fortune (H70)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Parsecboy (talk · contribs) 19:06, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
Not much to complain about here.

1 dupe link
"as a fast minesweepers"
Link battlecruiser
I wonder about describing the Indian Ocean raid as an "invasion"
"patrol boat" would probably be better linked to Vorpostenboot
That's all from me. Parsecboy (talk) 19:06, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

I took the liberty of fixing those, Parsecboy, assuming that the duplicate link you found was the second one to patrol boat. Howicus (Did I mess up?) 23:22, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
Actually, the link to patrol boat was fine - it was the second light cruiser link - there's a script Sturm and I both use that highlights duplicate links with a red box (if you want to install it, it's here). Thanks for taking care of these little details - @Sturmvogel 66:, you owe him one ;) Parsecboy (talk) 12:10, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on HMS Fortune (H70). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091230223824/http://www.navalandmilitarymuseum.org/resource_pages/bells/bells.asp to http://www.navalandmilitarymuseum.org/resource_pages/bells/bells.asp
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:30, 13 January 2017 (UTC)