# Talk:Equatorial Guinea at the 2004 Summer Olympics

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Equatorial Guinea at the 2004 Summer Olympics. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080611091801/http://www.la84foundation.org/6oic/OfficialReports/2004/Results/ to http://www.la84foundation.org/6oic/OfficialReports/2004/Results/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:57, 25 December 2016 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Equatorial Guinea at the 2004 Summer Olympics/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Dom497 (talk · contribs) 17:37, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

Will start review now.--Dom497 (talk) 17:37, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it well written?
A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct: 

B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation: 

Is it verifiable with no original research?
A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline: 

B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines: 

C. It contains no original research: 

D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism: 

Is it broad in its coverage?
A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic: 

B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style): 

Is it neutral?
It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each: 

Is it stable?
It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute: 

Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content: 

B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions: 

Overall:
Pass or Fail: 
On hold for 7 days.--Dom497 (talk) 18:00, 20 April 2018 (UTC) Pass!--Dom497 (talk) 22:41, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

"Roberto Mandje and Emilia Mikue Ondo in the middle and long distance disciplines." - Middle and long should be reversed and the end of the sentence should mention "respectively".
 Done MWright96 (talk) 20:29, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
"Mikue Ondo was selected as the flag bearer for the opening ceremony." - I don't think this is significant enough to be in the lead.
Not too sure about this. This is something that I have followed from other articles since I wrote these kind of articles. MWright96 (talk) 20:29, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
This is me just being picky, but if multiple sentences use the same reference you can just include one citation on the last sentence. For example, the first three sentences in the "Background" section use the same reference. Also, I suggest having citations in the middle of sentences and just move them to end of the sentence. Again, me being picky. :)
That was me was being cautious at the time. Anyway, the issue has been resolved. MWright96 (talk) 20:29, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
"He had not previously competed in any previous Olympic Games" - Remove one of the "previous"'s.
 Done MWright96 (talk) 20:29, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
For statements like: "(two minutes and 22.88 seconds)", stay consistent and either spell out the number of use the actual number. For example, "(2 minutes and 22.88 seconds)".
 Done MWright96 (talk) 20:29, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
Add a key for "DNS" (for the tables).
 Done MWright96 (talk) 20:29, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
"Two runners, Peter Roko Ashak and Samwel Mwera, did not start" - So when "Mandje finished 37th out of 39 runners", is 39 including the two that didn't start? The wording is not clear.
Hope the wording I've put is more clearer to you. MWright96 (talk) 20:29, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
For "Roberto Mandje"'s table, why does the Semifinal column say "N/A" but the Final column say "Did not advance". Shouldn't they both say "Did not advance"?
The 3,000 metres steeplechase does not have a semi final which is why an N/A is there. MWright96 (talk) 20:29, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
Ah ok. Thanks for clearing that up.--Dom497 (talk) 22:40, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
Reference #2 needs an access date.
Are you sure? Have triple-checked and have not found that any of the references are missing their access dates. MWright96 (talk) 20:29, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
Whoops...I guess I'm blind.--Dom497 (talk) 22:40, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
Is Sports Reference reliable? This page makes me skeptical.
Yes, see RSN and multiple FAC and FLC's it has been used in. Courcelles (talk) 19:44, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
@Courcelles: Ok thanks for linking the discussion. The Sports Illustrator quote resolves this issue.--Dom497 (talk) 20:03, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
Good work. On hold for 7 days.--Dom497 (talk) 18:00, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

@Dom497: I have made the adjustments where possible. MWright96 (talk) 20:29, 20 April 2018 (UTC)