# Talk:Harrie Massey

This review is transcluded from Talk:Harrie Massey/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: The Herald (talk · contribs) 15:43, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
The review will be done shortly, AFAP by me. Ṫ Ḧ the joy of the LORDmy strength 15:43, 6 March 2015 (UTC)


### Criteria
### Review
Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors: 

B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists: 

Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. Has an appropriate reference section: 

B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary: 

C. No original research: 

Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects: 

B. Focused: 

Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias: 

Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc: 

Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content: 

B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions: 

Overall:
Pass or Fail: 


### Comments and discussion
The lead requires a slight rewrite to remove the 'influential' and the next sentence could be connected with the first as a single phrase. A little more expansion in the very first paragraph will do good.
Done. Hawkeye7 (talk) 19:01, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
The info box must have at least two inline or full cites, specially rectifying the death and birth date.
The Infobox summaries the article and must not have inline cites. Hawkeye7 (talk) 19:01, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Don't think so. Galileo Galilei do not have so, neither many other GAs of similar fields. Inline cites provide better stability and at least two of them are expected in the infobox. Ṫ Ḧ the joy of the LORDmy strength 07:14, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
WP:INFOBOXREF: References are not needed in infoboxes if the content is repeated (and cited) elsewhere or if the information is obvious. If the material requires a reference (see WP:MINREF for guidelines) and the information doesn't also appear in the body of the article, the reference should be included in the infobox. However, editors should first consider including the fact in the body of the article. Hawkeye7 (talk) 07:57, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
Copyvio shows about 70% paraphrasing which must be reduced by a rewrite.
Despite the figure, the compare shows no sign of paraphrasing at all. Hawkeye7 (talk) 19:01, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
royalcommission1851.org is dead and must be removed or replaced.
Replaced. Hawkeye7 (talk) 19:01, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
The Collisions of Material Particles from cam.ac.uk must be updated of access date.
Added. Hawkeye7 (talk) 19:01, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Though images are not a criterion, an image or two in the early life and career and later life sections will be appreciated.
Added. Hawkeye7 (talk) 19:01, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Death could be better explained in a new section.
Moved to a new section. Hawkeye7 (talk) 19:01, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Second paragraph of Second World War needs few more inline cites.
Section is fully referenced. Hawkeye7 (talk) 19:01, 6 March 2015 (UTC)


### Result
 The article passed the GA review to gain a Good Article status. Though I have a slight concern on the lack of cites in the info box, it does not pose a great threat for the article's gradation as GA. Some red links point towards future articles and an image of the person is appreciated in the article. Ṫ Ḧ the joy of the LORDmy strength 11:58, 8 March 2015 (UTC)


### Additional notes
The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Harrie Massey/CommentsTalk:Harrie Massey/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
Last edited at 00:02, 21 October 2006 (UTC).
Substituted at 17:11, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Y The article was completely rewritten in March 2015. Hawkeye7 (talk) 21:25, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Harrie Massey. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140716041723/http://www.aip.org.au/info/?q=content%2Fharrie-massey-medal-and-prize to http://www.aip.org.au/info/?q=content%2Fharrie-massey-medal-and-prize
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:29, 25 January 2018 (UTC)