# Talk:Mario Kart 64

The redirect Koopa Troopa Beach has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 18 § Koopa Troopa Beach until a consensus is reached.  QuicoleJR (talk) 16:51, 18 November 2024 (UTC)

The redirect Mario Raceway has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 18 § Mario Raceway until a consensus is reached.  QuicoleJR (talk) 16:52, 18 November 2024 (UTC)

The redirect Choco Mountain has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 18 § Choco Mountain until a consensus is reached.  QuicoleJR (talk) 16:54, 18 November 2024 (UTC)

The redirect Wario Stadium has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 18 § Wario Stadium until a consensus is reached.  QuicoleJR (talk) 16:54, 18 November 2024 (UTC)

It would seem there is disagreement over whether a specific port is noteworthy for inclusion and supported by RS, please discuss that here. 184.152.65.118 (talk) 16:24, 15 July 2025 (UTC)

The source is biteyourconsole.net, an Italian website, which is not listed as a reliable source under WP:VG/S (not at all, actually). Another editor stated they attempted a cursory search and it's just not being reported by anyone else. Even if "true" as BubbleberryChubkins insists, it already fails notability. ThomasO1989 (talk) 16:29, 15 July 2025 (UTC)
Strictly speaking the question is one of noteworthiness rather than notability which instead guides when a standalone article is appropriate. All additions likely to be challenged must be supported by RS detailed at WP:MINREF but that alone does not guarantee inclusion covered at WP:VNOT. Nonetheless BubbleberryChubkins should be offerred an opportunity to make the case for inclusion here. 184.152.65.118 (talk) 16:36, 15 July 2025 (UTC)
The addition is also inaccurate. It claims it's made by the Starship team, but that's not mentioned in the biteyourconsole source. (Mostly because it's not true; Starship was made by the same team as Ship of Harkinian and SpaghettiKart.) The attempted addition also includes unnecessary editorialization, i.e. "The port was released before the 'SpaghettiKart' port, according to Github commit logs, however 'SpaghettiKart' received more media attention, despite less features." All of which has no source and simply comes off as the author injecting personal bias. -- Cyberlink420 (talk) 16:53, 15 July 2025 (UTC)
Even though BubbleberryChubkins has been blocked indefinitely on WP:NOTHERE, there's clear consensus not to add this information. ThomasO1989 (talk) 18:14, 15 July 2025 (UTC)

I have checked other Nintendo/Mario-related articles here and I notice many of them use American English, but this one? It doesn't use American English like others, yet it still uses mdy dates, instead sticking to Commonwealth English. I get that this is a site that anyone can edit, but this is one of who knows how much inconsistencies with Nintendo's articles on this site. Anyway, if there are other Nintendo-related articles which use British/Commonwealth English, I guess that other inconsistencies with these articles exist (although there are understandable exceptions like Europe-related Nintendo topics). 2800:150:143:1BDE:1D21:CA88:7828:434C (talk) 17:28, 3 October 2025 (UTC)

Super Mario Galaxy also uses British English; both articles were heavily written by British editors who brought them up to GA/FA. We should update the dates to be DMY instead of MDY. ThomasO1989 (talk) 17:33, 3 October 2025 (UTC)
If you say the dates should be changed to dmy, then that's the better option 2800:150:143:1BDE:C0A9:71F:32EA:C2A8 (talk) 21:40, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
WP:ENGVAR and MOS:RETAIN explains how these situations are generally handled. "Consistency between a company's products" isn't one of the standards, so its not an issue in of itself. Sergecross73 msg me 19:15, 3 October 2025 (UTC)