# Talk:Grainger Plaza

This review is transcluded from Talk:Grainger Plaza/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Though this article is interesting, it is to brief. Containing only 2.14 KB of prose, the article does not provide enough information. The article draws information from nine sources, but not all of them can be verified. The article is stable, and provides a neutral point of view. However, it is not yet of GA quality. With work, it could get there. Expansion is needed, and additional referencing. --Jordan Contribs 14:16, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

The refs that you can not verify are from a book that has been widely cited in the popular press [1] [2] [3].  You may find it at your local library or bookstore.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM)  19:11, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
Second opinion - I agree with the reviewer's assessment. Additionally, much of the information in the article is already in Cloud Gate which is wikilinked in the article.  —Mattisse (Talk) 01:09, 19 September 2008 (UTC)

I found three sources with two new minor facts.  I hope that gets us over the hump along with the improved infobox.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM)  05:59, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
Perhaps this article should be merged with Millennium Park, Cloud Gate or some other related article. So far, there does not seem to be enough independent information not included in other article to justify an independent article for this subject, and not a GA, in my opinion.  —Mattisse (Talk) 16:46, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
This has been forked from Cloud Gate because of the hatnote difficulties and lead paragraph bold problems of merging the two pages.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM)  07:07, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
I just added the last detail that I could hope to find about the topic.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM)  17:46, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
Though it seems to go against my better judgement, I conclude that this article appears to meet all of the GA criteria. It is balanced, neutral, makes good use of images, has no mistakes, and is overall cetainly correct. I have decided to pass it as a GA. Jordan Contribs 19:07, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

http://www.millenniumpark.org/parkevents/parkmap.pdf
In Exelon Pavilions on 2011-03-18 11:58:15, 404 Not Found
In Harris Theater (Chicago, Illinois) on 2011-03-22 22:03:22, 404 Not Found
In Jay Pritzker Pavilion on 2011-05-04 01:36:03, 404 Not Found
In Jay Pritzker Pavilion on 2011-05-04 03:42:47, 404 Not Found
In AT&T Plaza on 2011-06-20 01:06:16, 404 Not Found
--JeffGBot (talk) 01:06, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on AT&T Plaza. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081013000729/http://www.millenniumpark.org/artandarchitecture/cloud_gate.html to http://www.millenniumpark.org/artandarchitecture/cloud_gate.html
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080910132602/http://www.pbcchicago.com/upload/454.pdf to http://www.pbcchicago.com/upload/454.pdf
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080602021642/http://www.lynnbecker.com/repeat/Gehry/kapoor.htm to http://www.lynnbecker.com/repeat/Gehry/kapoor.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:23, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

An editor has requested a potential GA review of this article. The main issue I see would be updating it as it doesn't go beyond 2006. But I am not sure what needs updating. Google searches don't turn up a hell of a lot (mainly links to Dallas). I am sure there is probably something to add in the last 15 years, but I am not sure what and am inclined to remove the request. @TonyTheTiger: as the nominator in case they have more ideas. Aircorn (talk) 22:39, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

Even then, this article definitely doesn't still qualify for good article status User:What am you are 7(talk) 3:32, 29 October 2021 (UTC)