# Talk:Catholic Church in Nepal

The image included is copyrighted material.  There is no fair use comment in the article, and as far as I can tell, no attempt was made to obtain permission from the copyright owner to use the image. MamaGeek (Talk/Contrib) 16:26, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

But there is a fair use rationale and a tag, and a source. Judgesurreal777 16:29, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
I just added two fair use tags in the article itself, thought you meant on the image itself. Judgesurreal777 16:32, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
Three points:

Assuming you uploaded the image, did you try to obtain permission from the copyright holder?
I'm not convinced of the fair use rationale you provided.  I added a fair use review tag to the image, so someone more knowledgable can check it out.  This is not the same as a fair use dispute, and will not necessarily lead to its deletion, unless the reviewer takes that route.
I do not think this article should receive Good Article status until this is cleared up.
MamaGeek (Talk/Contrib) 16:54, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

I'll take it down and request that they release it into the public domain, and I'll put out a request for a free use image :) I think the GA review can be completed now.Judgesurreal777 18:02, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

After review, I have found this article to meet the qualifications for Good Article status. It is well written and comprehensive, as well as being well referenced. Further enhancements could include more free/fair use images (proper licences is critical to GA or FA status), and further development with current events (regarding the new constitution in Nepal). If you have any questions about my rationale, leave me a message on my talk page. Phidauex 19:17, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

This discussion is transcluded from Talk:Roman Catholicism in Nepal/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.
This article has undergone a reassessment as part of the GA sweeps performed by the Good Article Project Quality taskforce in order to ensure that it still meets the requirements for Good Article status.
This article, like the one dealing with Catholicism in Afghanistan, is very well-written. I find it to be informative and cover all the major aspects of the topic. There are no neutrality or stability issues.
I had a few concerns as I looked through the article. However, since they involved little work, I elected to make the necessary changes myself. I did a little bit of copyediting, updated the dead links for the references, added a more detailed fair use rationale for the image, and added a couple sentences about Nepal's new consitution to bring the article up to date. I don't believe that this constitutes serious involvement with the article, and I can objectively say that the article is up to current GA standards. I am closing this reassessment as keep.

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Roman Catholicism in Nepal. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060617065919/http://pcusa.org/pcnews/2006/06254.htm to http://www.pcusa.org/pcnews/2006/06254.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 13:35, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Roman Catholicism in Nepal. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20060707055253/http://www.asianews.it:80/view.php?l=en&art=3893 to http://www.asianews.it/view.php?l=en&art=3893
Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20070929134249/http://www.asianews.it/view.php?l=en&art=6356 to http://www.asianews.it/view.php?l=en&art=6356
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 23:55, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Roman Catholicism in Nepal. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20070928013357/http://www.wavemag.com.np/issue/article697.html to http://www.wavemag.com.np/issue/article697.html
Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20060621203545/http://www.catholic.org:80/international/international_story.php?id=19914 to http://www.catholic.org/international/international_story.php?id=19914
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 11:26, 6 March 2016 (UTC)