# Talk:Jeni Bojilova-Pateva

If someone ends up finding sources soon it would be good to expand this because the importance isn't really clear as is. Coralshin (talk) 19:32, 26 December 2011 (UTC)

Also count not find sources via Google. Tripnoted (talk) 05:55, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
Also, the new source is very similar the works section... Tripnoted (talk) 06:05, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

thank you tweet! Victuallers (talk) 09:37, 5 July 2019 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Jeni Bojilova-Pateva/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Dr. Blofeld (talk · contribs) 18:30, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

I'll try to review this tomorrow.♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:30, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Lede
"

"After graduating with teaching credentials she began her profession, but was barred from teaching when a law was passed limiting married women's rights. She turned to activism and journalism, becoming involved in the international women's movement." - dates?  Done SusunW (talk) 13:36, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
" Her book В помощ на жената (To Help Women) -year?  Done SusunW (talk) 13:36, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
Career
" began giving talks on the" -began as an orator for ?  Done SusunW (talk) 14:03, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
Italicize the names of the newspapers in English. "The situation of woman and child in Bulgaria" -should be capitalized as a title in English too.  Done SusunW (talk) 14:03, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
"In 1909, she published an article in the newspaper Ден (Day) arguing for women's emancipation and in 1910, " -and the following year? -to avoid being repetitive with citing dates.  Done SusunW (talk) 14:03, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
Legacy
" She is remembered, along with Anna Karima, as one of the "two most prominent leaders of the women's movement" in their era." -really? If it's a quote state who it's by.  Done SusunW (talk) 14:03, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

@SusunW: Well done, nice to see you expanding existing articles too.♦ Dr. Blofeld 10:21, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

Thanks Dr. Blofeld for the review, yes, as long as it isn't someone where drive-by trivial content is repeatedly added, I enjoy cleaning up articles. This one was a joy to do as I learned a lot while writing it. SusunW (talk) 14:03, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality: 
B. MoS compliance: 
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources: 
B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary: 
C. No original research: 
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects: 
B. Focused: 
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias: 
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc: 
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales: 
B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions: 
Overall:
Pass or Fail: 
Nice one.♦ Dr. Blofeld 10:42, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

Would it be possible to divide the "Career" section into subsections? Right now it consists of 1,748 words, out of a total of 2,175 words (80% of the article). Subsections might make it easier to read. AmericanLemming (talk) 21:26, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

AmericanLemming "anyone can edit", but I've tried to break it up. Is it easier for you now? SusunW (talk) 21:38, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
Thank you. That's much better. AmericanLemming (talk) 21:44, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
de nada SusunW (talk) 21:46, 12 September 2019 (UTC)