# Talk:Chennai Super Kings

Ravisrinivasan Sai Kishore's jersey number in CSK is 96 which has not been added in the current player's name table. 117.193.83.122 (talk) 10:45, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. ◢  Ganbaruby!  (Say hi!) 01:09, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

{{subst:trim|1=

|79|| Krishnappa Gowtham || style="text-align:center"| ||  (1988-10-20) 20 October 1988 || Right-handed || Right-arm off-break || style="text-align:center;"| 2021 || style="text-align:right;"| ₹9.25 crore (US$1.1 million) ||

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Asartea Talk | Contribs 12:59, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

Add Jason Behrendorff to list of bowlers in the squad. Staycaffeined (talk) 09:46, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Terasail[✉] 14:39, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

Suresh Raina is no longer the vice-captain of CSK. That role has gone to Ravindra Jadeja. Please edit it. 60.254.12.157 (talk) 09:43, 16 October 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 11:51, 16 October 2021 (UTC)

Can I pls edit this page? There are some mistakes and some formatting to do. If I get the permission then I would be very grateful. Slasher2468 (talk) 05:46, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
Request from Slasher2468. Slasher2468 (talk) 05:47, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: this is not the right page to request additional user rights. You may reopen this request with the specific changes to be made and someone will add them for you, or if you have an account, you can wait until you are autoconfirmed and edit the page yourself. Cannolis (talk) 06:03, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

please add that " Chennai Super Kings is the first Indian Sports Enterprise that has become a unicorn, their Brand Value if more than 1billion US$."
 Centriputal (talk) 07:11, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

 Already done by Extorc. ---CX Zoom(he/him) (let's talk|contribs) 07:23, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

The csk brand value in 2021 is 1 billion dollar roughly 7500 crore 2409:4053:E8D:96BA:7F79:5D69:4637:7295 (talk) 07:51, 8 February 2022 (UTC)

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 12:12, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
Please refer the below sources which affirms the brand value of CSK in 2022 to be Rs 7,600 crores. Hence, CSK is now India's first sports Unicorn.
References:
https://www.insidesport.in/ipl-2022-ms-dhoni-led-chennai-super-kings-break-all-valuation-records-now-1st-unicorn-sports-enterprise-in-india/
https://www.thequint.com/indian-premier-league-ipl/csk-indias-first-sports-entity-to-become-a-unicorn-worth-rs-7600-crore#read-more.
https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/markets/expert-view/csk-valuations-will-reflect-in-all-ipl-franchise-valuations-sanjiv-goenka/articleshow/87278169.cms?from=mdr
Please, change the sentence: "The brand value of the Super Kings in 2019 is estimated to be around ₹732 crore (roughly $104 million), making them one of the most valuable IPL franchises."  to the following:
The brand value of the Chennai Super Kings in 2022 is Rs 7600 crores, hence becomes India's first Sports entity to be Unicorn. 2409:4072:6C0C:288E:10A9:20A5:9970:C0B (talk) 14:56, 24 March 2022 (UTC)

We want to create a page Joburg Super Kings for SA20 (cricket). Anyone is ready or not 37.231.43.38 (talk) 14:05, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

Adarsh7403 (talk) 11:03, 12 December 2022 (UTC)

Can you  create an page Chennai Super Kings Ltd so put teams that owned by CSK just the Mumbai Indians " Indianwin sport Limited" 2600:4040:2492:4400:ED2C:AE0F:6677:4055 (talk) 23:44, 22 March 2023 (UTC)

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. M.Bitton (talk) 00:55, 23 March 2023 (UTC)

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

MS Dhoni in 2023.jpg
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 07:53, 31 May 2023 (UTC)

Rachin Ravindra is listed as overseas player in the source but on the wikipedia page. 2001:5A8:4309:A000:E85F:68E2:1105:4249 (talk) 02:48, 20 March 2024 (UTC)

@King Dhoni
Hey, what you added to the CSK article seems a bit biased. I understand you are a Dhoni fan and I am too, but it is important to use a neutral point of view when writing articles.
"making a grand comeback to IPL after serving the suspension period" does not sound like something that should be in a wikipedia article. Hope you can understand.
"On 21 March 2024, CSK have announced that MS Dhoni, (who had captained the franchise from the inaugural season) has stepped down as captain and handed over the captaincy to Ruturaj Gaikwad, moments before the captains photoshoot with the IPL trophy a day before 2024 season going underway"
Do you feel like the timing is important? Feel like it is not that important after a few days, especially since Dhoni was already going on to take a new role, this was expected.
All the best for CSK 2024! Skratata69 (talk) 18:36, 21 March 2024 (UTC)

Hi, thank you very much for getting in touch with me. Ok, I agree that the usage of “making a grand comeback after suspension” might sound a bit awkward and regarding the timing, it is important to some extent as I live in USA and also lived in UK. Here in western countries, they are so particular and curious about the day anything interesting or bad takes place. So I guess since the date of March 21 was mentioned, probably no need of few days thing to be mentioned which I will correct myself and make it look better! King Dhoni (talk) 20:26, 21 March 2024 (UTC)

IPL 2024: Ms Dhoni left the captaincy of Chennai Super Kings and Rituraj Gaikwad is going to be the new captain of CSK. Wpkrishartirc (talk) 07:37, 22 March 2024 (UTC)

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate.  v/r - Seawolf35 T--C 00:18, 1 April 2024 (UTC)

103.10.226.208 (talk) 14:14, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

 Not done: this is not the right page to request additional user rights. You may reopen this request with the specific changes to be made and someone may add them for you. Myrealnamm (💬talk · ✏️contribs) at 14:46, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Chennai Super Kings/GA4. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: Magentic Manifestations (talk · contribs) 10:39, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: Velthorian (talk · contribs) 08:57, 24 December 2024 (UTC)


### Pass
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
This is a great piece of work and, it meets the good article criteria.
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, spelling, and grammar):  b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): 

It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.
a (reference section):  b (inline citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):  d (copyvio and plagiarism): 
As of now there aren't any issues but there are  some links which are appropriate yet it shows they're spammy
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 

It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 
The language is neutral enough to be certified as.
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 
There hasn't been any recent edit war
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 

Overall:
Pass/Fail: 
Pass.I wish you good luck with improving the article, even more!
Velthorian, it seems like you have "passed" the article, but you seem to think the article has issues (as not all criteria has been marked as pass)- you also have not passed it at the talk page, where it's actually supposed to be passed. Would you like any help to understand the instructions, or am I just inferring the wrong idea from this review? DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 07:20, 28 December 2024 (UTC)

No, you are just getting the wrong idea. I aren't any issues. I mean the tool is showing tem spammy but they aren't. By the way thanks for alerting me that my edit on talk page didn't save well. Velthorion (Alarm!) 07:53, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
I was more talking about criteria 4, as it's marked as "don't know". Also, you have to atleast do a spot-check and mention which sources were checked (basically- just check some references to see if what is said in them agrees with the text that precedes the ref.)
Also, yeah, the tool sometimes does that, can be marked as pass, you don't need to mark it as neutral. DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 08:13, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
Sorry, it was an edit mistake Velthorion (Alarm!) 08:19, 28 December 2024 (UTC)

The result summary by opposition must be edited. They are mostly empty as of now. 136.233.9.123 (talk) 12:28, 14 March 2025 (UTC)

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. The results seem to be there in the table. Please be specific about what needs to be added. LizardJr8 (talk) 19:38, 18 March 2025 (UTC)

I have reverted a large number of edits made by user:RavirajRam1297, "RR" hereafter. The reasons are not hard to explain. In the name of addition of content, RR has significantly altered the structure of the article, which is listed as a GA. They have removed previously written text with proper sources without any due reasons, copy pasted from other articles, and consistently failed to quote sources for new additions with large swathes of uncited text. Their prose is poor and nonstandard with no adherence to MOS. Here are a few examples:

Large swathes of uncited text: Last few lines of 2008, 2009, 2010 seasons, majority of 2011 and so on. Additional cn tags across sections.
Poorly referenced:  "In the 2011 IPL, they lost three of their first five games which placed them at the bottom of the ten-team points table." The reference given is the points table, from which the result conclusion cannot be drawn.
Removal of citations: For some of the sections (e.g. pertaining to 2011 season), the earlier version had proper citations. The user edited it conveniently removing all citations without any due reason.
MOS:STYLE violations in terms of quoting numbers across the article + bare links across the page as citations.
Removal of entire sections/lines without due reason. Statistics such as with the result against opposition and branding section have been blanked without due reason.
Separation of a section about controversies against WP:CONTROVERSY
Copy paste of List of Chennai Super Kings cricketers as is into the article + team box from the 2025 Chennai Super Kings season.
When an editor comes across a good article with such errors or inadequacies, not to mention large-scale copy pasting and removal of previous content, they have no option but to revert to the last clean version. In other words, these are not edits that can be selectively fixed. The user has not provided edit summary for any of the edits as well. The user can make use of the sandbox if they are trying something, rather than inappropriate edits to the main page. The user would need to provide a proper rationale with appropriate edit summary and needs to arrive at a consensus before doing such en masse removals/additions to a GA article. 
Thanks! M2 (talk)

Bold the years, when franchise won the IPL in seasons years Sivawikiman (talk) 18:39, 24 March 2025 (UTC)

 Not done: see MOS:BOLD. No reason to bold the years here. Alpha Beta Delta Lambda (talk) 18:46, 24 March 2025 (UTC)

In the infobox's City section, kindly change just Chennai to Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. (As it is the same per all other IPL teams) and maintain unanimity. Thank you. Editking100 (talk) 15:20, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

Sooo Write the years in which csk has been to the final and lost and win ratio 49.47.217.106 (talk) 17:10, 11 June 2025 (UTC)

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Cannolis (talk) 18:35, 11 June 2025 (UTC)