# Talk:Need for Speed: ProStreet

Does anyone know the name of the game engine (i.e., middleware) used in the development of NFS: ProStreet? Is it third-party or in-house? Aeonassoc 14:44, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
no Mariofan1000 09:01, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

Has this title been confirmed? I have reverted the page redirects to "Need For Speed: All Star" as they went wrong (although I'm sure the editor who moved the page had the best intentions) and because I wasn't sure whether this title had been confirmed yet.
Seraphim Whipp 00:55, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

In any case, cut-and-paste was not the correct way, and it was proper to revert the move.  If it is confirmed, we can use the move tab. hbdragon88 01:01, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
I have never heard of that title before, and have not seen it anywhere else. As far as I'm concerned, all edits done to promote this title as a fact, without proper references, should be considered as vandalism and be reverted. --MrStalker 16:57, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
I have not heard of that title before, either. But I would think that the editor of that might have had good intentions and may not be a vandalist. --Ceddy063 00:05, 25 May 2007 (UTC) —The preceding comment was added by 71.137.0.101 (talk)
If he had good intentions he would cite his sources. --MrStalker 00:13, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
Always best to assume good faith.
Seraphim Whipp 00:39, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
Is this newlyfound title true, or a source of vandalism? If it is vandalism I suggest that that IP is blocked. tentrtnrbrtn03:31, 25 May 2007 (UTC) —The preceding comment was added by 71.137.0.101 (talk)
Please just stop vandalising this article! I will now post a request to block your IP. --MrStalker 07:53, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Already reported.  IP address has been blocked for 24 hours. hbdragon88 18:35, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
You're kidding, right?  Vandalism is constantly made on many articles.  Saying "Please" and blocking an IP won't stop them. In fact, it will attract them to the challenge and pleasure of knowing they're annoying you. -- Lyverbe 19:50, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
Well, we can try.  Some vandals do reform. hbdragon88 04:19, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
Yo, I am that one guy who you guys are calling a vandal. My homes, i am new to Wikipedia and was not yet familiar with the lingo and tricks of the trade. About that Need For Speed All Star; i got that there title from a school magazine, and did not know that that there title was not really the title. Seeyalater 71.137.0.101 00:29, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
That's why we send you messages at your talk page and have this discussion, so newbees like yourself can learn. By the way, if you are serious about Wikipedia, get an account. You got several warnings before you got blocked, but you ignored them. That's not the way we do it here. --MrStalker talk 07:14, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
I did not know that i recieved any warnings, where do i find my talk page? I did not even know that i had a talk page. 71.136.233.5 23:47, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
You are not contributing logged in, witch means that only your IP are shown as editor. Each computer or LAN have its own IP, so if you change computer your IP will not be the same. The talk page of the IP you used when vandalizing this article and this talk page is User talk:71.137.0.101 --MrStalker talk 12:11, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Hmm, you can see in this page http://www.ea.com/nfs/carbon/ Pegi rating 12+ and esrb rating Everyone (10+). Or is that for Carbon? Yoosq 15:10, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

That is right, those ratings are for Carbon. As you can see in the trailer, the rating for North America is currently Rating Pending and for Europe 3+. --MrStalker talk 17:17, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
Just curious, why is it taking ESRB much longer to rate this game than PEGI? And does anyone know what the rating will probably be? Denver nuggets25 23:08, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

Why is everyone write ProStreet although in the official Pro Street page shows Need For Speed: Pro Street Yoosq 03:18, 1 June 2007

Read the announcement, it's ProStreet. REDWOOD CITY, Calif. - May 31, 2007 - Electronic Arts Inc. (NASDAQ:ERTS) announced today that the blockbuster Need for Speed™ franchise is introducing a new version that drives the series in a new direction. Need for Speed™ ProStreet is a ground-breaking Need for Speed experience where you're thrust to compete head to head against the best street racers in a multitude of racing showdowns. The game is being developed by EA Black Box in Vancouver, B.C., and is slated to ship this fall. --MrStalker talk 08:44, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
That is right. It is called has Need for Speed: ProStreet --SkyWalker 09:17, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
ProStreet is the title if you need any more convincing than the official logo. One other thing; the new trailer (official) ends with COMING 10-31-07 so there is an official release date which I have posted. Take it down if you don't like it. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 124.190.210.169 (talk • contribs) 07:50, 4 June 2007 (UTC).

Eh, no it dosen't, it ends with "COMING NOVEMBER 07". If you have found another official trailer, link please. Otherwise, deliberately re-adding false information will be considered vandalism. --MrStalker talk 13:28, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
So any confirmations about 31.10.2007? If no, it going to be removed. Elk Salmon 22:14, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Oh well, as it turns out the official release date actually is 31 October, for the american market. Europe is still November 07. The American trailer and website have been changed since launch, but the European (UK) hasn't. This should have been mentioned and discussed on this talk page before reverting, which this user failed to do. Hence he or she has failed to follow the guidelines of Wikipedia which was shown to the user, multiple times, on the user's talk page. --MrStalker talk 22:26, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
like anyone cares about a gap Mariofan1000 08:59, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
Say anything you like. 17:34, 6 March 2008 (UTC)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.107.43.72 (talk)  

What's the point of this section?  It talks about magazines that have mentionned the name "ProStreet" which is not at all relevant to the game itself.  I removed the whole section yesterday and somebody wrote it back.  Am I the only one who thinks it doesn't belong in the article? -- Lyverbe 16:44, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

It's a story on how the title has been brought to user's attention. It's a history of game development. It's relevant for the article. Elk Salmon 18:59, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

I have removed some outdated info from the article, and replaced it with info based on the official announcement. I also made some other smaller adjustments. Please comment and/or improve. --MrStalker talk 16:48, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

When will the official announcement for the name be released from EA? Does anyone have a date of when any info and/or the carlist will be released? Tentrtnrbrtn063 01:04, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
Huh? The game and its name has already been announced, but no specific date of further information. --MrStalker talk 13:34, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Take a look on EA Singapore's website for NFS:PS: here. It seems to me that there is an official cover art available, so I uploaded it and included it in the article. Source provided by NFSPC.tw (here). --MrStalker talk 23:29, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Who the game's distributor is in Russia is totally irrelevant to the article. This is english wikipedia, therefor we must stick with international standards. We simply cannot add information about the distributor in each country to all articles. Thus, the info is removed from the article. --MrStalker talk 21:49, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

Yes, we do it for every game. That is why the option distributor is made for. And because it's an encyclopedia, not a guidebook for English speaking people. Elk Salmon 23:44, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
No, we don't. The option distributor is made for use in articles about a game where the distributor and the publisher isn't the same. In this case Electronic Arts both publish and distribute the game. Since Russia is a little special market, basically all games that are being sold there goes through a different distributor. The question is: Is there information about the Russian distributor in other video game articles? No, there isn't. Hence, it's irrelevant to the article and the vast majority of readers. --MrStalker talk 09:15, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
Hasn't this information been present in the article for months? What reasons are there for removing it now? 0_o
Seraphim Whipp 08:25, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
Because it has become irrelevant. --MrStalker talk 09:15, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
How could the list of official developers, publishers, distributors, designers etc could be irrelevant? It's indeed relevant. Elk Salmon 12:42, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
They aren't, it's the Russian distributor that's irrelevant. Who's the Russian distributor is very irrelevant to everybody except Russians. There is a place for such information: Russian wikipedia. --MrStalker talk 14:08, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
Since there is no answer I'll remove the info for now. --MrStalker talk 18:31, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
The answer was given before your post. Wikipedia is not a guidebook, but an encyclopedia. International distributors, publishers, developers, release dates etc is an important relevant data. Not all people that want to know them have a knowledges in all languages. Also to note - en.wiki is an international. Majority of non english speakers use it, because of lack of data in local wikies. Elk Salmon 07:47, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
I agree. International distributors, publishers, developers, release dates etc are important relevant data. National/local ones, such as Soft Club, aren't. --MrStalker talk 14:47, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

Since several NFS fansites offer a lot of things not covered here (latest news for example), why shouldn't they be listed under external links? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.77.6.1 (talk • contribs) 16:57, 12 June 2007

Because it's not allowed under WP:LINKS. --MrStalker talk 18:30, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
Where exactly did you read that? - WP:LINKS - What should be linked Sites that contain neutral and accurate material that cannot be integrated into the Wikipedia article due to copyright issues, amount of detail (such as professional athlete statistics, movie or television credits, interview transcripts, or online textbooks) or other reasons.

Does anyone at EA actually know what Pro Street means in the context of street racing? From what I've seen so far, none of the in-game cars are Pro Street cars. Pro Street is defined as a street-legal version of a Pro Mod drag car.. ie RWD, narrowed rear axle to accomodate huge rear-wheel tubs (I mean huge- Mickey Thompson 33x21 in. tyres), large V8 etc, often running 8 sec and under quarter-mile times. It'd be interesting to see if the Camaro etc in the game are actually true Pro Street cars; I'd be pleasantly surprised if they were.--Truetillbrew 21:20, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

Read the header: "This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Need for Speed: ProStreet article. This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject." --MrStalker talk 07:50, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
I'm fully aware what the header says, but the above post was made here specifically to avoid adding such comment to the main article. The product title is a very important part of the product, and may possibly be construed as misleading. I may add any instance of further discussion in this context to the main article if required, but would rather it remained here.--Truetillbrew 14:20, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
Nobody here knows what somebody at EA does or does not know. You will have to ask them the get an answer on that. If I would guess, I'd say the title ProStreet refers to Professional Street-racing, and has nothing whatsoever to do with Pro Mod cars. --MrStalker talk 14:30, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
Pro Street is a style of street racing car- that's my point. This is a street racing game of the same name. Hence the not-unreasonable question.--Truetillbrew 15:41, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
Perhaps, but most people don't even know what a Pro Mod/Pro Street car is. But this has nothing to to with the article itself. If one wants to know what cars there will be in the game one just got to take a look at the included carlist, it speaks it's clear language and there is no confusion. Regarding the use of a title that conflicts with a car type, you'll have to take it with EA representatives in the official forums. --MrStalker talk 18:49, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Do we know what version of directx it uses yet Link287 05:39, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Read the header: "This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Need for Speed: ProStreet article. This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject." --MrStalker talk 07:50, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
I know but i think if released the requirements of the game are important information in the article.Link287 23:24, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
If they'd had, I would have added it. So the answer is no. --MrStalker talk 07:05, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
of course PC requirements are important , but we still don't have official ones
"Pro Street - Unofficial System Requirements -- [...]DirectX: Version 9.0c[...]" from NFSGarage -> http://nfsaddons.com/nfshs/news/244/
I think its quite simple : how many PC's have DirectX 9 and how many have DirectX 10 or other. DirectX 10 only if its included in the DVD (I hope you don't start asking if it will be on a DVD or CD , its DVD obviously) --rapzeh  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rapzeh (talk • contribs) 20:46, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
- DirectX 10 is compatiable with Windows Vista only, and it's unlikely even EA would limit themselves like that. Since Carbon uses DirectX 9.0c, chances are ProStreet does too. Evils Dark (talk) 00:03, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

I watched the movie and i think we should add this movie into trailers. link. Yoosq 12:25, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

lol. why a link to gamespot (a site full of boring and forced ads) of a random gameplay vid whit no audio. official my ***
why not a link to all the videos http://www.gametrailers.com/game/4873.html
or to the first trailer
LD http://www.gametrailers.com/player/19790.html
HD http://www.gametrailers.com/player/19789.html
BTW , if you see "advertisement" in the upper left corner of a video (gametrailers only) just drag forward and the ad will pass after 3 seconds , you can't do this on gamespot  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rapzeh (talk • contribs) 20:37, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

In the article it says that there will be no cops in the game, is this confirmed? And if so, is there a source to this?
Also, in the article it says "Unlike its predecessors, all racing in ProStreet will take place on closed tracks" but every NFS game outside of the last three only took place on closed tracks. GSG Flash 14:27, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

Yes it is. Check out GameSpot's interview for the latest update. link. Closed tracks means dedicated race tracks, none of the previous Need for Speed games has taken taken place on anything as such, except perhaps URL-races in Underground 2. --MrStalker talk 11:14, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
actualy nfs1 se had two closed race tracks and highstakes had alot of closed tracks also if you haven't played the whole series you can't talk about the whole seris it has changed alot form beginning to now. Chardrc 15:51, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
The keyword is all. It has not been done before in this manner. --MrStalker talk 21:04, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
(rapzeh- still don't know how to sign :((
so... NO cops , we are 100% sure !
the tracks will be dedicated (legal closed tracks , no traffic or public roads)
but theres no red or yellow flag , so you can crash into others without any penalties and try to win by any means
"Unlike its predecessors, all racing in ProStreet will take place on closed tracks" -> closed tracks ≠ public roads without free roam  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rapzeh (talk • contribs) 20:23, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

Maybe someone should add picture or video links to each of the cars on the list, as conformation...?
Just a suggestion...
99.244.87.52 02:00, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

That won't be necessary since it's an official list direct from EA. --MrStalker talk 11:18, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

On this article, it states that the Bugatti Veyron will be part of pro street's vehicle lineup. Unfortunately, I do no see this on the official site for pro street. :-| —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.148.11.149 (talk • contribs) 17:23, 20 July 2007 (UTC).

That's why it has been reverted. --MrStalker talk 09:10, 22 July 2007 (UTC)

On the article page it says "ProStreet will focus much more on realism and move closer to racing simulation". I think this is not quite in line with what the producer of the game said recently: ""We're definitely not looking to make a simulation", source here. What do you think? Timppis 10:08, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

Closer to, not in to. --MrStalker talk 00:53, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

Is it forbidden now to add cars? Yoosq 18:39, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

Apperently, yes. Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games#Lists of cars. --MrStalker talk 20:57, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

According to the website, http://www.ea.com/prostreet/news.jsp?locale=us, it has list the follwing vehicles so far:

Nissan GT-R PROTO
1970 Plymouth® Hemi® Cuda
1995 Mazda RX-7
1999 Mitsubishi Eclipse
2006 Audi S4
1986 Toyota Corolla GTS AE86
2006 Mitsubishi Lancer EVOLUTION IX MR-edition
2006 Volkswagen Golf GTI
2008 BMW M3
[Chilled One, 10/27/2007, 2:51 pm]

Yeah, I know. --MrStalker talk 15:00, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
- It has more vehicles , there's an official and a unofficial carlist.
official     http://www.nfsplanet.com/nfsps_cars.php?lang=eng
unofficial   http://www.nfsplanet.com/nfsps_cars_inofficial.php?lang=eng
-rapzeh-  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rapzeh (talk • contribs) 20:02, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
So, what's the official verdict? I have not found any evidence suggesting that a car list is
strictly forbidden (I was not able to find anything with that link, MrStalker), and I think it would
add to the quality of the page if it were included. I just bought the game, and if anyone doesn't
mind, I'd be interested in just making the list myself. Loonybin0, Never underestimate a man in a straight-jacket 16:04, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
Oh, I see below that there is already a list in another section (perhaps someone should think about
deleting this one). Loonybin0 Never underestimate a man in a straight-jacket 16:10, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

Why was european release date removed (November 2 link)? Kaurikk 14:56, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

Because that's not a reliable source. There has been no official european release date announced yet. --MrStalker talk 15:04, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
Although that all places that are selling it (Gameplay, Amazon etc) have the same date marked as release date (pretty sure this date is given by EA to sellers)? By the way, Amazon releases it in US earlier than it is written here. Kaurikk 15:20, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
What you're saying is just speculation. See Wikipedia:Verifiability. --MrStalker talk 12:21, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
The new release date is not confirmed. In ProStreet homepage, the 14'th november date is for Europe, not for Worldwide or USA. Yoosq 16:00, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
The new release date on the official website for US/Canada says November 14. Other terrirories are unknown for sure, amazon suggest November 23 for Europe. --MrStalker talk 17:58, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

This has been intimidating me for awhile now are there gonna be old american muscle cars in prostreet nintedo ds version such as 70 barracuda 70 chevelle 67 camaro etc.`24.76.2.208 00:19, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

So? --MrStalker talk 15:00, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
Actualy never mind i'l figure it out later after prostreets release but thanks anyway.24.76.2.208 20:45, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
I finnaly found out i bought prostreet today and the only old muscle cars i'v seen so far are the

1970 Chevrolet Chevelle SS
1971 Dodge Challenger
so thats enough muscle cars for me but the 2007 mustang is nice as well. 24.76.2.208 (talk) 04:50, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

Both of these vehicles appeared in all of NFS series... what I'm thinking it should happen that both of these cars are rivals. Professional Gamer 16:34, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

in the past NFS the camera or the views were about 5 , whit no cockpit view
in NFS:PS the views will be basically the same , except for the hood view (it will be slightly to the left rather than central) AND (not verified) a kind of 360° view around the car , as in GTA: San Andreas. I only saw this in a vid on gametrailers (E3 2007 Developer Walkthrough , at 1:48) http://www.gametrailers.com/player/21919.html . I haven't tried the demo yet , does anyone know if there's gonna be this kind of view ?
--rapzeh 22:22, 3 November 2007 (UTC)rapzeh

The new ProStreet will also feature an advanced damage system, which will directly impact on your car's performance, unlike previous Need for Speed titles. This is especially significant in the Speed racing mode, as you can easily "total" your car.
There actually was a Damage system very like this in Need for Speed: Porsche Unleashed (Porsche 2000 in Europe)
-Chugger1992 19:44, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
It wasn't quite as advanced as what they make ProStreet's out to be, though.  In Porsche Unleashed I could have hit a truck and flipped down the street and still kept driving. --TopGear 21:05, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
there is only proper damage on ps3 an xbox 360. all others have same damage as carbon125.237.219.85 19:50, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

get some holdens in there like the old kingswoods or some holden commodores.
geez we aussies want some of our cars, all the other cars got there cars but not us  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.220.222.18 (talk) 03:44, 10 November 2007 (UTC) 

What? --MrStalker talk 10:16, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

Heres a of up to date cars that will be featured in Need for Speed: ProStreet
1999 Nissan Skyline R34
2006 Lexus IS350
1989 Nissan 240 SX (S13)
2006 Acura RSX
2006 Porsche 911 (997 Gen) Turbo
2006 Lotus Elise
1998 Toyota Supra
2006 Volkswagen R32
1967 Chevrolet Camaro SS
2006 Porsche Cayman S
2006 Nissan 350 Z
1969 Dodge Charger
2006 Honda Civic Si
2003 Infiniti G35
2007 Audi TT
2008 Chevrolet Camaro Concept
2006 Chevrolet Cobalt SS
1967 Chevrolet Corvette
1996 Ford Escort RS Cosworth
2003 Ford Mustang GT
2006 Ford Shelby GT 500
2006 Pagini Zonda F
2006 Subaru Impreza WRX Sti
2006 Volkswagen Golf GTI
2006 Lamborghini Murcielago LP 640
2006 Chevrolet Corvette Z06
2006 Mazda RX-8
1999 Honda Civic
1970 Chevrolet Chevelle SS
2006 Pontiac GTO
1999 Nissan Sylvia (s15)
1965 Pontiac GTO
2008 Porsche 997 GT2
2007 Audi S3
2006 Ford GT
2006 Cadillac CTS-V
1999 Acura Integra Type R
2006 Dodge Viper Coupe
1971 Dodge Challenger
2007 BMW Z4-M
Ford Focus ST
Nissan GT-R  Proto
Mazda RX-7
BMW M3 (E92)
2006 Ford Mustang GT
Infiniti G35
Mazda Speed 3
Mitsubishi Eclipse (2nd Gen)
Toyota Corolla GTS
Audi S4
BMW M3 (E46)
Mitsubishi Evo X
All car names were taken from credible sources:
needforspeed.com
http://ps3.ign.com/articles/832/832093p1.html
http://ps3.ign.com/articles/813/813139p1.html
http://ps3.ign.com/articles/830/830436p1.html

Is there gonna be free roam in this, it would be a real shame if there wasnt  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.183.121.212 (talk) 07:34, 15 November 2007 (UTC) 

No. --MrStalker talk 09:23, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
A better answer to this would be "This is not a forum".  Answering these questions encourages them to keep doing it. -- Lyverbe 12:05, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
Or maybe not be a stuck up and answer a patheticly easy question so they stop whinin' about it. --MrStalker talk 14:38, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

The site says that the online part of the won't be for the playstation 2.  This is true, but its also not going to be there for 
the Wii either.  I request that we change that so people don't get to happy about it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tlev (talk • contribs) 17:15, 15 November 2007 (UTC) 

Done. You know, it's allowed to make such changes yourself. --MrStalker talk 14:41, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

does anybody know why the price of the game is so cheap?
its 30 bucks here in canada brand new for ps2
its less for ps3 too i think
does anybody know why?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.225.247.46 (talk) 03:27, 30 November 2007 (UTC) 
I bought it for 40€ in Italy
--rapzeh (talk) 19:44, 3 February 2008 (UTC)rapzeh

I did a search for the Autobahnring on at least 3 sites/ search engines and turned up no info on a real locale, I looked at maps of the Tokyo Dockyards on a few sites and found nothing matching the ingame track.
T18 23:02, 2 December 2007 (UTC)T18 Dec 2 07
 -the tracks are not copies of real existing tracks , but are made to look as if real and as if you were racing in that part of the world. So the names are just generic , except for some tracks maybe... --rapzeh (talk) 19:48, 3 February 2008 (UTC)rapzeh

[...] all racing in ProStreet takes place on closed tracks, thus making it the first game in the series not animating illegal racing behaviour, as a result there aren't any police in the game.
This is just wrong, there were NFS games before ProStreet without any police in them - Porsche Unleashed for example. Stealthbg (talk) 05:19, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
There were Police in Porsches Unleashed just not in the race mode

Porsche Unleashed factory driver mode included "delivery" events, that included traffic and cops, but the cops could only interfere with a players car, not stop or ticket the car. Jeffareid (talk) 14:08, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
There were no cops in undergroud 2 59.154.24.147 (talk) 07:40, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
208.188.233.2 (talk) 16:24, 10 December 2007 (UTC)T18 December 2007

It doesn't say it's the first game without cops, so wtf are you whining about? --MrStalker (talk) 10:57, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
yes , but the racing in underground 1&2 weren't legit , its just that (magically) there were no cops--rapzeh (talk) 19:51, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
The non-pursuit modes of the older games didn't involve cops. Rather than fret over which games did and didn't have illegal racing, why not just state that ProStreet is about legal racing, unlike it's immediate predecessors? Jeffareid (talk) 14:08, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

i think there is some difference between the game on different platforms. coz ppl said there would b a wind tunnle, but i cant seem 2 find it on PS2, also i cant seem 2 find the Lexus IS350 or something... the damage on PS2 also seem 2 b less detailed then the PC version; all u get is scratches, even if ur car is totaled it looks only scratched.
if there is some difference can someone plz write about it?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 219.89.215.248 (talk) 23:28, 12 December 2007 (UTC) 

Am i allowed to start a trivia section of this article? I was browsing through some others and the trivia section was nominated for deletion.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.165.105.254 (talk) 12:21, 15 December 2007 (UTC) 

EA's releasing a Booster Pack with all the 16 cars that were previously only attainable through hex-editing.
So I changed the page to fit the news.
69.244.136.156 (talk) 21:01, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

Maybe the Booster pack should have its own section on the pageT18 (talk) 23:09, 19 December 2007 (UTC)T18

The booster pack is a result of the developer having to meet the November deadline. So it's basically updating the game from version 0.9 (pre-release) to 1.0. --MrStalker talk 09:59, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

i thought it only has a DVD version for the computer??  —Preceding unsigned comment added by RacerzGTR (talk • contribs) 03:13, 1 January 2008 (UTC) 

becouse the article is not writen like ad
the games specs,reception,ect was noted
not things like prices and this best place to
go get the game for less than $50.00
there was no marketting sceem.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Blueking12 (talk • contribs) 16:27, 10 January 2008 (UTC) 

How do you unlock the new 2008 camaro?--Ryan Stinnett (talk) 20:55, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

There is a diffrence in the wii version and xbox or whatever version this information came from

 Grip Class races take 8 racers and divide them into two even groups. The racers are placed into the groups based on their vehicles performance potential. Group A starts about 10 seconds ahead of group B, both groups race on the same course but are only competing against the 3 drivers in their group. 

In the wii version there are no groups. The race starts at the same time for all 8 cars. No matter what your proformance you alwasy start in last, making it very difficult if you start with a fast excellerating car because all the other cars tend to bunch up untill the first turn.

Now i know my word isn't a reliable source, but i own the wii version so i know for a fact that this is true 68.172.82.0 (talk) 02:02, 7 September 2008 (UTC) LightGiver 68.172.82.0 (talk) 02:02, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

The car featured in that ad was a Ferrari, a car not featured or licensed for use with ProStreet. Some claim (probably jokingly) that the only reason the ad was pulled because of the Ferrari. Jeffareid (talk) 14:00, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

Why is "Microsoft Windows" listed as a Platform? Microsoft Windows is an Operating System not a Platform! The Platform should be PC.
Silberwoelfin 14:55, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

Nah, it should be Windows - you can have a PC with Linux or OS X, they can't play ProStreet. Thanks! Fin©™ 16:48, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

I was wondering, was this http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HpxZOdE_-ck a viral advert for the game? It seems very likely that it was, but I can't find any confirmation. The address given at the end is down now. Any thoughts? Caspar esq. (talk) 13:10, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

I'm pretty sure the way the plot section is described is completly wrong. I don't know where whoever wrote the section got the idea that Ryan and you (the player) are different people. I think it is pretty clear the game is refering to you (the player) when the announcer says Ryan. 59.167.212.224 (talk) 09:39, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

Just plainly states that - no date, no details. -- TVippy  11:58, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 6 external links on Need for Speed: ProStreet. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070602150806/http://www.electronicarts.co.uk/news/13119/ to http://www.electronicarts.co.uk/news/13119/
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071011120509/http://uk.gamespot.com/video/939664/6180305/need-for-speed-prostreet-official-movie-10 to http://uk.gamespot.com/video/939664/6180305/need-for-speed-prostreet-official-movie-10
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071120124532/http://music.ign.com/articles/818/818659p1.html to http://music.ign.com/articles/818/818659p1.html
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081227121318/http://www.dmwmedia.com/news/2007/09/28/ea-details-soundtrack-junkie-xl-score-for-need-for-speed-prostreet to http://www.dmwmedia.com/news/2007/09/28/ea-details-soundtrack-junkie-xl-score-for-need-for-speed-prostreet
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080406133215/http://eastore.ea.com/servlet/ControllerServlet?Action=DisplayPage&Env=BASE&Locale=en_US&SiteID=ea&id=ProductDetailsPage&productID=83514100 to http://eastore.ea.com/servlet/ControllerServlet?Action=DisplayPage&Env=BASE&Locale=en_US&SiteID=ea&id=ProductDetailsPage&productID=83514100
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.elspa.com/?i=3944
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:02, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Need for Speed: ProStreet/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Berrely (talk · contribs) 14:31, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it well written?
A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct: 
Article maintains good grammar, it has a good sentence structure, doesn't seem to be any errors.
B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation: 
The lead is nicely written, providing a good overview. The article layout follows standard and sections aren't too long. All attributions are sourced.
Is it verifiable with no original research?
A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline: 
Well formatted list of references
B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines: 
I've looked at the sources and I can't find a single unreliable one. Most sources used are marked as reliable in WP:RSP. After running the article through some automated tools, it came up with no dead links.
C. It contains no original research: 
I've looked at all claims and statements in the article, and they are all backed up by sources. I can't find any OR here.
D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism: 
Earwig comes up with no copyright violations
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic: 
The article addresses all main aspects of the subject.
B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style): 
Important aspects are covered well, and no undue weight or unnecesary detail is given on subjects that do not need it.
Is it neutral?
It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each: 
The article maintains a NPOV throughtout it.
Is it stable?
It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute: 
I've got a nice little script that does this for me, but I also took a look at the history just in case. The article is very stable and there has not been any rewversions for the past 3 months.
Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content: 
All media is non-free, and valid fair-use rationales have been given for them. Free media cannot be used as the game is coprighted.
B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions: 

Overall:
Pass or Fail: 
Congratulations! This was a very well written article.
@Berrely: Thanks for your review, really appreciated. --Niwi3 (talk) 16:36, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

Can somebody fix this please? Roswell2000 (talk) 16:44, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

 Done Ludoyo (talk) 16:58, 2 January 2023 (UTC)