# Talk:Nikita Mears

The article should be at Nikita (character). This is usually how these types of articles work to avoid redundancy in the title. Blake (Talk·Edits) 17:36, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

I agree, the problem is that by calling it "Nikita (character)" it woul refer to Nikita in the original film and La Femme Nikita, and this article seems only designed for the recent TV show. I am open to a name change, but to something that makes it suitable for the current TV series. -- Matthew RD 23:03, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
Shouldn't this article be better devoted to all the "Nikitas" or should we have a seperate article linked to from a specific "Nikita (character)" page (which would cover the 3 previous iterations and general characteristics)?--99.66.254.212 (talk) 00:49, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
It is my understanding that whoever created the page intended to include the more recent incarnation of the character. -- Matthew RD 00:59, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Nikita (Nikita character)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Ruby2010 (talk • message • contribs • count • logs • email) 20:38, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
Will review soon. Ruby comment! 20:38, 2 September 2011 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose):  b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): 

It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 

It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 

It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 

It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 

Overall:
Pass/Fail: 


### Comments
"She was chosen for the role because series creator Craig Silverstein wanted an actress who was "beautiful, who could fight," and be believable with a gun, qualities the producers felt Q had, while the actress was intrigued by the original Nikita film and Luc Besson's creation of an incredibly flawed female character." Long, run-on sentence that needs rewording
Too many "she"s and "her"s in plot;  "Her first kill assignment was Victor Han (Russel Wong)." Her -> Nikita's
"In "The Guardian" Nikita reluctantly takes an ally in Owen Elliot (Devon Sawa), Monroe's killer and guardian to a black box, which houses Division's operations.[5][6] " Reword
Identify who Seymour Birkhoff is
"Alex is discovered to be her mole who would no longer wish to help Nikita;" Reword, plus the sentence is too long (three semicolons!)
Link The CW in creation section
Also in creation section, you use "wanted" a lot; change it up
"before we knew who Nikita ..." Capitalize before
"Because the CW is a fashion-orientated network, there were times Nikita had to be dressed in a certain way to get her noticed." This is a little ambiguous; noticed by who? Viewers? Other characters on the show?
Slate is italicized
Either add publishers for all sources, or remove the ones who have (i.e. The New York Times Company etc)
Otherwise, article looks good. On hold for seven days while above issues get addressed. Please respond here when finished. Thanks, Ruby comment! 21:58, 2 September 2011 (UTC)

I have addressed the issues more or less. For the last comment I decided to add publishers on all sources I could. However, I'm having trouble identifying Collider, HitFix, and PopMatters. -- Matthew RD 17:13, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
Hmmm I can't seem to find those publishers either. Oh well, it's possible there is no publisher. Anyways, I'm happy to pass this one. Nice work, Ruby comment! 18:52, 3 September 2011 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Nikita Mears. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120627224815/http://www.tvguide.com/special/summer-tv/PhotoGallery/TVs-Sexiest-Crime-1034736/1034741 to http://www.tvguide.com/special/summer-tv/PhotoGallery/TVs-Sexiest-Crime-1034736/1034741
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:33, 18 June 2017 (UTC)