# Talk:Invasion of Guadeloupe (1810)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Invasion of Guadeloupe (1810)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
GA review of this version:Pn = paragraph n • Sn = sentence n

GA review (see here for criteria)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose):  b (MoS): 

I found two missing commas (for shame!) but have added them already.
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 

It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 

It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars etc.: 

It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 

Overall:
Pass/Fail: 

Another fine article, Jacky. Other than the most minor of issues (already changed), the article passes on first reading. Good job! — Bellhalla (talk) 12:21, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

Thanks very much!--Jackyd101 (talk) 18:47, 14 May 2009 (UTC)