# Talk:Haven (Star Trek: The Next Generation)

Does anybody know which other episode Wil Wheaton hates most in season one? Anyone also know the audioblog entry on the internet, so that we can cite it? enderminh 17:19, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

He wasn't even in this episode, so does anyone really care that he hated it? Squidd (talk) 12:33, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Haven (Star Trek: The Next Generation)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Retrolord (talk · contribs) 06:48, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
You know how this works, so i'll just get straight into it now, thanks! ★★RetroLord★★ 06:48, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
" the filmed version" Is this referring to the regular version, if so, why call it the "filmed" version? 

Urgh - that should have been final version. I've amended it. Miyagawa (talk) 22:36, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
Plot section ends a bit abruptly, could you add something to make it clear this is the end of the epiosode?

Added some further detail earlier on in the plot and stated that the Tarellian vessel departed the system. Miyagawa (talk) 22:36, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
First two sentences of production section don't link very well, and are a bit confusing. I think the second sentence seems a bit out of place, could you rewrite this section?

Rejigged the first paragraph - changed the sentence order a little and reworded a couple of parts. I think it flows better now. Miyagawa (talk) 22:42, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
Passed the article, thanks Miyagawa ★★RetroLord★★ 05:18, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

It's applicable to all TNG episodes reviews - Why on earth (and other planets) should I or anyone else care what mere human Zack Handlen of some site called "The A.V. Club" thinks??? Or the opinion of any of the other reviewers who watched the episodes more than 20 years after the original airdate? How can you write such an inaccurate line that "Critical response to the episode was mixed, with the performance of Barrett both praised and criticised" when you don't reference any of the responses to the episodes when they came out? The opinions of some ordinary people from some small blogs are of no importance. To claim that Barrett was criticized you should bring examples from the time the episodes aired - magazine articles (TV Guide, EW, Sci fi magazines etc) or literature. People who lived and watched the show at the time remember that MBR was given very positive reviews, and when writing about her performance you should refer to the original reviews and not some critique from a handful of insignificant blogs.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.179.192.55 (talk) 19:46, 10 September 2013 (UTC) 

Simply because I don't own any of the magazines that were around at the time, and the online sources from those don't have reviews of most episodes. So we're stuck with AV Club, Tor.com etc. Miyagawa (talk) 20:10, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Haven (Star Trek: The Next Generation). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://archive.is/20130412012013/http://www.tower.com/star-trek-next-generation-episode-5-patrick-stewart-vhs/wapi/109139364 to http://www.tower.com/star-trek-next-generation-episode-5-patrick-stewart-vhs/wapi/109139364
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:54, 31 October 2017 (UTC)