# Talk:Church of St Nicholas, Sapareva Banya

This review is transcluded from Talk:Church of St Nicholas, Sapareva Banya/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Pyrotec (talk) 10:49, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

I will review. Pyrotec (talk) 10:49, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for devoting your time and looking forward to your review!  — Toдor Boжinov — 16:31, 17 January 2011 (UTC)


### Overall summary
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

A short, but interesting, well-referenced and well-illustrated article on a local church.
Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality: 
I did a couple of minor edits to improve the grammar.
B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists: 
Yes, however the WP:Lead is intended to both introduce the article (which it did well) and to summarise the main points of the article. I copied a pasted a few words from the Architecture section into the Lead, as it did not provide much in the way of a summary.
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources: 

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary: 

C. No original research: 
Yes, but there may be a problem with reference 2, used five times, my web brower gives an error message - "The URL is not valid and cannot be loaded".
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects: 

B. Focused: 

Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias: 

Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc: 

Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales: 
Well illustrated.
B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions: 
Well illustrated.
Overall:
Pass or Fail: 

I'm awarding this article GA-status. Congratulations on producing an interesting and well illustrated article.

Thanks for your review and lead expansion! I figure you were unable to access the ref 2 URL because part of the address is in Cyrillic. I'll WebCite all URLs in the article so that we don't lose them in the future :) Best,  — Toдor Boжinov — 14:49, 19 January 2011 (UTC)