# Talk:New History Warfare Vol. 3: To See More Light

No way. Stetson hardly improvises at all during his pieces, as far as I am aware they are very carefully composed and not played with much variation at all between different performances of the same compositions. It's barely even jazz, let alone free jazz. Experimental jazz, maybe. From the little I know about free jazz, improvisation seems basically essential to the genre so I don't think this album could fit. I'll change it to something more appropriate.27.252.121.224 (talk) 12:35, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

Fair enough. Thanks for taking the time to post here :)  — sparklism  hey! 14:38, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
Yeah, we need at least a source there. This isn't jazz, it's drone/minimalist by way of saxophones. 190.185.118.102 (talk) 19:40, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:New History Warfare Vol. 3: To See More Light/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: 3family6 (talk · contribs) 20:18, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors: 
Clear, no copyvios or close paraphrasing, no errors.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 17:15, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists: 
Follows MOS.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 17:15, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. Has an appropriate reference section: 
Well-formatted reference section.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 17:15, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
B. Citations to reliable sources, where necessary: 
Plenty of citations to reliable sources.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 17:15, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
C. No original research: 
All content is verifiable.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 17:15, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects: 
All major aspects covered, uses summary style.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 17:15, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
B. Focused: 
Focused on subject, no extraneous detail.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 17:15, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias: 
Neutral presentation, opinions are attributed to sources.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 17:15, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc: 
Highly stable, no instances of disruptive editing since this article was created.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 17:15, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content: 
The album cover is used within fair use policy, and has appropriate rationale.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 17:15, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions: 
The album cover is essential to the article, and is used appropriately.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 17:15, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
Overall: Passed.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 17:15, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
Pass or Fail: 
Note: The nominator told me that they will be without internet access for a bit and can't respond to comments, so I am taking my time at reviewing this article.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 15:37, 11 February 2015 (UTC)