# Talk:HMS Triumph (1903)

This review is transcluded from Talk:HMS Triumph (1903)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Jackyd101 (talk · contribs) 00:09, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
Hi there, I am happy to tell you that this article has passed GA without the need for any further improvement. Listed below is information on how the article fared against the Wikipedia:good article criteria, with suggestions for future development. These are not required to achieve GA standard, but they might help in future A-class or FAC review process.

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose):  b (MoS): 
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 
Is a link to South American dreadnought race relevant for the design paragraph (this point is also relevant to the HMS Swiftsure (1903) article I reviewed a few days ago).
Captain during the First World War was Maurice Swynfen Fitzmaurice - this should be mentioned in the article.
It would be beneficial to incorporate some information on the wreck of Triumph. This website [1] might not qualify as an RS, but it does demonstrate that there is interest in the wreck as a dive site and that there has been a National Geographic documentary made on the shipwreck.
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
a (fair representation):  b (all significant views): 
It is stable.

It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
a (tagged and captioned):  b (lack of images does not in itself exclude GA):  c (non-free images have fair use rationales): 
Overall:
a Pass/Fail: 
Thankyou and congratulations, an excellent addition to Wikipedia:Good Articles. All the best.--Jackyd101 (talk) 00:09, 7 April 2012 (UTC)