# Talk:Mount Vernon Triangle Historic District

This review is transcluded from Talk:Mount Vernon Triangle Historic District/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: JackFromReedsburg (talk · contribs) 00:34, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
Hello, I will be reviewing this article. I'll leave some more in-depth comments later. 00:34, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, spelling, and grammar):  b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): 

It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):  d (copyvio and plagiarism): 

It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 

It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 

It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 
2 images have fair use rationales, but other than that all are in a compatible CC license
Overall:
Pass/Fail: 


### Comments
The article is well written with good sources. It is well illustrated. Copyvio check came up clean, and the only potential issue was a quote. "Table of contributing buildings" may be better titled as "List of contributing buildings", but at that point its just personal preference. 2 images have fair use rationales, both of the demolished buildings. It would be nice to have a "NRHP in Washington D.C." navbox on the bottom, but is not absolutely required. I'm not seeing anything that would prevent this article from becoming a GA, so I'll be promoting it. JackFromReedsburg (talk | contribs) 01:48, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

Thanks so much for taking the time to review the article. APK whisper in my ear 20:08, 3 April 2021 (UTC)