# Talk:Hale's law

@CoronalMassAffection Hi - I noticed that you reverted the recent more detailed image to your original - no problem with that as even I had actually wanted to add to your original image itself - but wiki did not allow to replace with updated version - hence had no choice but to upload the updated version as a separate new image altogether.
Anyways, just wish to suggest that if you feel right- you may add some of the cues from the removed image - one, that "n" denotes even solar cycles and "n+1" denotes odd solar cycles and two, normally if you notice, you may find that the N-polarity regions are relatively smaller than the S-polarity regions most of the time - which I had tried to incorporate in the removed image.
So just see and decide if you feel the need to update your original image a bit - good day. Jn.mdel (talk) 14:14, 21 November 2025 (UTC)

Hi @Jn.mdel. It would not be appropriate to overwrite the file I uploaded, see c:COM:OVERWRITE. The information you have added directly to the diagram is clear from context and the accompanying caption. I do not think it needs to be included in the diagram itself. CoronalMassAffection (talk) 20:47, 21 November 2025 (UTC)