# Talk:Daylight (Taylor Swift song)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Daylight (Taylor Swift song)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: Ippantekina (talk · contribs) 02:17, 6 March 2025 (UTC)
Reviewer: Jorge906 (talk · contribs) 11:15, 28 April 2025 (UTC)

So I'd say pass? Jorge Lobo Dos Santos (talk) 14:29, 28 April 2025 (UTC)
Hey there! I think the article is pretty solid. It’s clear and easy to follow, making it accessible for a lot of readers. The lead does a good job of summarizing the key points about the song while sticking to the Manual of Style guidelines. It covers a lot of ground, touching on things like the song's background, how it was made, when it came out, live performances, and how it was received, which gives readers a nice overview.
The article uses reliable sources from reputable outlets, keeping it fact-based and avoiding original research. That said, there are a few things that need some tweaking.
It might be worth checking the inline citations to make sure they’re consistent throughout. In the Background and composition section, every claim—especially the details about production and lyrics—should have a citation at the end to back it up. Most of the points are well referenced, and even if details about the production and lyrics don't have citation(s) in the sentence, I'm guessing it's not a big deal, as all information is backed by a reliable source.
Also, while the Reception part does a good job of showing different critics’ views, I think it could use some streamlining in a couple of paragraphs. This would make it easier to read without losing the depth of the commentary. These minor changes could help the article stay strong against any future disputes and keep its quality high.
All in all, I think the article does meets the criteria for a Good Article—it's well-written, verifiable, covers a lot, and keeps things neutral. Any additional comments?

If it is a pass can you please pass it? Ippantekina (talk) 04:51, 29 April 2025 (UTC)
Yes. Jorge Lobo Dos Santos (talk) 07:24, 29 April 2025 (UTC)