# Talk:Federalist No. 23

This review is transcluded from Talk:Federalist No. 23/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: AryKun (talk · contribs) 19:53, 29 January 2024 (UTC)

Wikisource link to infobox.
"power should be infinite" I think "unrestrained" works better than "infinite" here.
"rather than as enumerated powers" Unclear how this contrasts with the "ends it is meant to achieve"; a brief explanation would be helpful.
Capitalize Anti-Federalists.
"would lack the means to achieve its ends" to "would deprive the government of the means to achieve its ends"?
"government powerless in raising a defense in Federalist No. 34" This is somewhat awkwardly worded, I initially parsed it as meaning that Hamilton was raising a defense of some point. Perhaps reword to make it clearer that it's about the actual government's ability to defend the country.
References seem reliable; will spot-check later.
Spot-checks: All sources checked verify claims made.
"Federalist Papers: Primary Documents in American History". Library of Congress.
"Federalist Essays in Historic Newspapers". Library of Congress.
Newcomer, Kathryn E.; Kee, James Edwin (2011). "Federalist No. 23: Can the Leviathan Be Managed?".
Barber, Sotirios A. (1988). "Judicial Review and "The Federalist"". The University of Chicago Law Review.
That's all I have, nice work. AryKun (talk) 20:57, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
AryKun I've made the suggested changes. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 21:44, 6 February 2024 (UTC)