# Talk:Nasodigitoacoustic syndrome

The lede, and indeed the main text, states that this condition affects less than 200,000 people in the US and less than 1 in 2000 in Europe. These figures, though accurate on a strict interpretation of "less than", are nevertheless thoroughly misleading - they're based on the respective territories' maximum definitons of a "rare condition", meaning that the actual figure could be (and probably is) very much lower. Do we have any more accurate estimates of real prevalence? --11:09, 11 April 2011 (UTC)

Those are the only sourced figures I find; but I will change the wording :) Good idea! Rcej (Robert) - talk 01:48, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Nasodigitoacoustic syndrome/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Regards, MacMedtalkstalk 02:46, 20 April 2011 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose):  b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): 

It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 

It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 

It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 

It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 

Overall:
Pass/Fail: 

I will get started on this in depth tomorrow. Regards, MacMedtalkstalk 02:46, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
Looks pretty good so far, no major issues. Now combing for image problems or issues with MoS compliance. Regards, MacMedtalkstalk 22:35, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
On hold for now. Regards, MacMedtalkstalk 22:59, 20 April 2011 (UTC)


### Comments
No period at the end of the X-chromosome caption. Doesn't form a complete sentence.
 Done
The reference "Hereditary hearing loss and its symptoms" needs an accessdate.
 Done
The {{Main}} in "Cause and Genetics" needs to be at the top.
 Done
"Cited Literature" should be renamed to "Works or Publications" and moved above the references section.
 Done
The "et. al" and the dates when you refer to studies need to go. That information is available in the references and just clutters up the article.
 Done
Regards, MacMedtalkstalk 22:59, 20 April 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for reviewing! Much appreciated :) Rcej (Robert) - talk 04:24, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
Looks good. Congrats! Regards, MacMedtalkstalk 12:19, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

Is there an image available of the finger changes? Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 03:55, 1 September 2011 (UTC)