# Talk:Bruno Mars: 24K Magic Live at the Apollo

This review is transcluded from Talk:Bruno Mars: 24K Magic Live at the Apollo/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Minecrafter0271 (talk · contribs) 00:12, 3 January 2020 (UTC)

Here is my Good Article Review of Bruno Mars: 24K Magic Live at the Apollo.


### Article Rundown
#### Lead
I don't have any issues with the lead.


#### Background
I think that the proper names should be Wikilinked. I'm not going to wikilink it, but just to let you know
"As they had booed at "Amateur Night at the Apollo." I don't really understand what that means. If you could elaborate on that more, that would be great.
Wikilinked what is available on wiki and fixed said sentence. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 12:40, 3 January 2020 (UTC)


#### Synopsis
During his performance of 'Versace on the Floor' Mars wears green trousers, a silk Hawaiian-style shirt, no socks and brown leather loafers." I don't think you need to tell us what clothes he's wearing during one specific song. It can be confusing if you're like me and haven't seen it.
Fixed. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 12:40, 3 January 2020 (UTC)


#### Reception
"Ivory writing on the SoulBounce website..." Who is "Ivory?" Maybe you can elaborate more on that, that would be good.


##### Viewership and Accolades
The TITLE had a typo. Instead of "Accolades," which it should be, it was "Accollades," with 2 Ls instead of 1. I fixed it, but I am a little bit annoyed.
Sorry, thanks. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 12:41, 3 January 2020 (UTC)


#### Final Comments
To be honest, I'm not sure how this is going to play out. It's a good article, but it isn't 100% clear. But, then again, I'm not reviewing it for Featured Article, only Good Article, so it isn't as intense, and I can be a little bit more flexible. I might have to submit it for second opinion, though.


### Criteria
1. Well Written: The spelling and grammar are good, it is relatively clear, but the understandable part is a completely different issue. You see, since I was able to understand most of it, I'll pass it for now.
2. Verifiable With No Original Research I think that the sources listed are reliable and that there are citations wherever they are needed. So, that's a pass.
3. Broad in it's Coverage I believe that it is rather broad and doesn't go too off topic. So, that's a pass.
4. Neutral I think that the article is in fact non-biased and therefore passes.
5. Stable I see that the article is stable because it seems like all the citations are dated either 2018 or 2017, and because I have already passed it for verifiability, I am convinced that the article is stable, so I will pass this one.
6. Illustrated It isn't too illustrated, but I am convinced that from the subject of the article, that it difficult enough to find quality media to give it a pass, officially passing the article, entitled Bruno Mars: 24K Magic Live at the Apollo. for the title of Good Article. Congratulations! Minecrafter0271 (talk) 02:11, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
@Minecrafter0271: Thank you. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 12:42, 3 January 2020 (UTC)


### Successful good article nomination
I am glad to report that this article nomination for good article status has been promoted. This is how the article, as of January 3, 2020, compares against the six good article criteria:

1. Well written?: Pass
2. Verifiable?: Pass
3. Broad in coverage?: Pass
4. Neutral point of view?: Pass
5. Stable? Pass
6. Images?: Pass

If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to have it Good article reassessed. Thank you to all of the editors who worked hard to bring it to this status, and congratulations.