# Talk:Go Farther in Lightness

This review is transcluded from Talk:Go Farther in Lightness/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: K. Peake (talk · contribs) 08:19, 10 August 2023 (UTC)

It is reasonably well written.
a. (prose, spelling, and grammar): 

b. (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): 

It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a. (reference section): 

b. (citations to reliable sources): 

c. (OR): 

d. (copyvio and plagiarism): 

It is broad in its coverage.
a. (major aspects): 

b. (focused): 

It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 

It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): 

b. (appropriate use with suitable captions): 

Overall:
Pass/fail: 

(Criteria marked  are unassessed)
This is quite an old nomination for the GAN backlog! --K. Peake 08:19, 10 August 2023 (UTC)


### Infobox and lead
The exact release date needs to be sourced in the body as 18th August
Same for the recording months
Sony Music Studios, Sydney → Sony Music, Sydney
The lead is quite disordered at the moment; the first sentence should be followed by the info currently in the second para, then reception and awards followed by commercial performance and legacy
"It debuted at number one" → "The album debuted at number one"
Mention it was certified platinum in Australia and by the Australian Recording Industry Association (ARIA)
"the album won four awards" → "four awards were won by Gang of Youths"
"Go Farther in Lightness's lyrics focus" → "its lyrics focus"
"bleakness and triumph,"" → "bleakness and triumph"," per MOS:QUOTE
Shouldn't the tour be mentioned by name in the lead?
"where three tracks from the album placed" → "where three other tracks placed"
"was critically acclaimed by reviewers and" → "was acclaimed by music critics and"
"It topped the annual" → "A top position was achieved the annual"
"and two of its tracks featured" → "and two of the tracks featured"


### Background
Add the "I don't think" part to end the frontman's quote
Where is the EP release sourced in relation to his quote?
No visa complications are sourced


### Composition
I think swapping these sub-sections would make for the correct order


#### Lyricism
"something you love,"" → "something you love"," per MOS:QUOTE – these are throughout when you have punctuation inside quotes at unsuitable points
Where are the recurring themes sourced?
Pipe soul to Human spirit


#### Production and recording
Wikilink Darlinghurst to itself
Avoid any usage of claim per WP:CLAIM
Audio sample looks good!
I have noticed more MOS:QUOTE issues in this sub-section, as I explained for the other one
"interludes for the album" → "interludes for Go Farther in Lightness"
The interpolation is not sourced


### Release
Retitle to Release and promotion
Wikilink David Le'aupepe on the img text
The release date is sourced as 9 February with no music video, mention this was the lead single from Go Father in Lightness too
"They would later perform" → "Gang of Youths would later perform"
The ARIA position needs a source and the link should be to ARIA Charts
"was released on 26 July" → "was released on 26 July 2017"
The sixth and final single is not sourced
Remove wikilink on Australian Albums Chart and this needs to be sourced; if not, change the information
Reword the certification sentence to saying the album was certified in Australia by the Australian Recording Industry Association (ARIA) with the number of copies


### Tour
"made their United States TV" → "made their US TV" per MOS:US
"The band toured" → "Gang of Youths toured"
"They performed for" → "The band performed for"


### Critical reception
"received widespread critical acclaim." → "was met with widespread critical acclaim from music critics."
"calling it "a remarkable" → "calling the record "a remarkable"
MOS:QWQ issues again
"called the album "a" → "called Go Farther in Lightness "a"
Remove pipe on The Music


### Legacy
"has been featured in" → "has led to rankings in" and end the sentence here, starting a new one for RS
"It also topped" → "The album also topped"
The Powderfinger, Chet Faker and 200 parts are not sourced
"Further, two more songs featured" → "Furthermore, two songs featured"
"has become the band's" → "has become Gang of Youth's"
Remove the 95 million part since it's not sourced
Table looks good!


### Track listing
Good


### Personnel
Good


### Charts
Good


### Certifications
Good


### See also
Good


### References
Cite Triple J as the sole publisher for all those refs and only wikilink on ref 6
Remove the publisher from refs 3, 13 and 49
Wikilink Music Feeds only on ref 4
Remove or replace ref 15 per WP:RSSM
What is ref 16 and why is it reliable?
Ref 18 is a duplicate of ref 4
Wikilink Dropbox and move to via with Australian Recording Industry Association as publisher on ref 25
What exactly makes refs 27 and 31 reliable sources?
Wikilink Renowned for Sound on ref 40
WP:OVERLINK of The Music on ref 47
Cite Double J as publisher instead and remove Australian Broadcasting Corporation on ref 49
Ref 52 is a duplicate of ref 42


### Final comments and verdict
 On hold until all of the issues are fixed; this is a bit messy but good luck! --K. Peake 19:08, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
Hey @Kyle Peake, I believe I've made all the suggested edits. Thanks so much for the feedback! Marcostev88 (talk) 13:00, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
Marcostev88 You still need to get rid of the duplicate RS ref as I pointed out. --K. Peake 07:04, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
@Kyle Peake fixed— sorry about that. Marcostev88 (talk) 15:38, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
 Pass now, well done on picking up quickly on the remaining problem! --K. Peake 16:48, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
@Kyle Peake Thanks for the review, appreciate your time! Marcostev88 (talk) 01:04, 20 August 2023 (UTC)