# Talk:Brayden Schenn

I added a photo from Team Canada's practice.  There was one there, but it was taken from the Wheat Kings website, and I have my doubts that it was actually released legitimately into the public domain, as was stated.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Brayden Schenn/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 20:58, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

This article is in decent shape, but it needs more work before it becomes a Good Article.
Is it well written?
A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct: 
In the Junior section, is this right ---> "Schenn apent the 2008–09 season playing with the Wheat Kings"? Is "apent" suppose to be "spent"? Same section, shouldn't "rookie of the year and most popular player" be "Rookie of the Year and Most Popular Player"? Same section, the second "In January of 2009" should be "In the same month" or something like that, that way you avoid adding the same thing later.
Fixed those, rearranged the section with the two mentions of January so they follow each other more closely, and don't use the same phrase
Check.
B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation: 
In the Minor section, is AAA supposed to be like this ---> 'AAA'. In the Junior section, "21, 2007 against the Saskatoon Blades" commas after dates, if using MDY. In the International section, please link "Whitehorse" to its correspondence article, as at the moment it stands out as a disambiguation. In the Junior section, add "CHL" after Canadian Hockey League, I mean I know what it means, but how 'bout your reader. Throughout the article, you need to have a consistency between "7th overall" and "fifth overall". Either spell out the number (seventh overall) or have the number (5th overall).
Also fixed these.
Half-check.
Sorry, I thought I had them all the first time.  I believe I have them all now.
Check.
Is it verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check?
A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline: 
Refs. 4, 9, 10, and 14 should not be in all capitals, per here. "Regina Leader-Post" and "The StarPhoenix" in Ref. 22 and 27, respectively, need to be in the "work" format. There's a dead link.
I am unclear on "work" format, but have fixed the rest of the links.  Also replaced the dead link with a cite from a different source
I got them. What I meant was replace the "publisher" format with "work", as Regina Leader-Post and The StarPhoenix are newspapers and need to be italicized.
B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose): 

C. It contains no original research: 

D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism: 

Is it broad in its coverage?
A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic: 

B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style): 

Is it neutral?
It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each: 

Is it stable?
It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute: 

Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content: 

B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions: 

Overall:
Pass or Fail: 
If the statements above can be answered, I will pass the article. Good luck with improving this article!
--  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 20:58, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

Addressed everything except the "work" format, will adjust that after clarification.  Canada Hky (talk) 23:16, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
One issue left. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 23:49, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
Got that one now too, I believe.  Canada Hky (talk) 23:55, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
Thank you to Canada Hky for getting the stuff I left at the talk page, because I have gone off and placed the article as GA. Congrats. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:13, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 9 external links on Brayden Schenn. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101024031822/http://www2.canada.com/saskatoonstarphoenix/news/sports/blades/story.html?id=cf2b4b3f-754d-4f64-a8a6-b2ca4b254d7d to http://www.canada.com/saskatoonstarphoenix/news/sports/blades/story.html?id=cf2b4b3f-754d-4f64-a8a6-b2ca4b254d7d
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120515231117/http://www.whl.ca/roster/gameByGame/id/390/ls_season/229 to http://www.whl.ca/roster/gameByGame/id/390/ls_season/229
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090312081817/http://www.whl.ca/stats/statdisplay.php?type=top_scorers to http://whl.ca/stats/statdisplay.php?type=top_scorers&subType=2&season_id=229&leagueId=26&lastActive=&singleSeason=&confId=0
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110707103615/http://www.albertahockey.com/story/13/WHL%20Report/2967/videos.aspx?id=237 to http://www.albertahockey.com/story/13/WHL%20Report/2967/videos.aspx?id=237
Added archive https://archive.is/20130119023533/http://communities.canada.com/REGINALEADERPOST/blogs/slapshots/archive/2010/03/17/whl-awards-all-stars-eastern-conference.aspx to http://communities.canada.com/REGINALEADERPOST/blogs/slapshots/archive/2010/03/17/whl-awards-all-stars-eastern-conference.aspx
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110426120739/http://www.whl.ca/article/whl-east-all-stars-and-awards-finalists to http://www.whl.ca/article/whl-east-all-stars-and-awards-finalists
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110727234816/http://www.monarchshockey.com/news.php?nid=3974 to http://www.monarchshockey.com/news.php?nid=3974
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120303230041/http://www.faceoff.com/story.html?id=7e2c64b8-595d-4a34-8186-1319a5131622 to http://www.faceoff.com/story.html?id=7e2c64b8-595d-4a34-8186-1319a5131622
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121018102809/http://www.iihf.com/channels1011/wm20/news/news-singleview-wm20/article/brayden-schenn-sweeps-honours.html?tx_ttnews to http://www.iihf.com/channels1011/wm20/news/news-singleview-wm20/article/brayden-schenn-sweeps-honours.html?tx_ttnews
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:45, 24 July 2017 (UTC)