# Talk:Electric Chapel

I found several mentions of Electric Chapel in reviews of 'Born This Way', that should be used within the Critical Reception section.
NME gave it a positive review, stating "Elsewhere the sci-fi goth night-stalk ‘Electric Chapel’ perhaps nails the record’s blood-and-chrome aesthetics most effectively of all." Their review is here: http://www.nme.com/reviews/lady-gaga/12061
Spin also offers a positive review, stating ""Electric Chapel" pairs divine diva thump with a Van Halen guitar solo". The review here: http://www.spin.com/#reviews/lady-gaga-born-way-streamlinekonliveinterscope
BeatsPerMinute.com had this to sav. " “Electric Chapel” sees Gaga fusing metal riffs with electronic beats – think Iron Maiden meets 80s pop. These kind of changes in sound are what make Born This Way so much more interesting than her debut The Fame – which for the most part, played it safe." Another positive review that can be found here: http://beatsperminute.com/reviews/album-review-lady-gaga-born-this-way/
So that's three positive reviews, which would also likely swich the overall Critical Reception from 'mixed' to 'positive' also.--217.43.77.174 (talk) 12:56, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

I added the NME and Spin sources to the reception section. BeatsPerMinute seemed more appropriate under composition, so that's where I placed it. I think the first line of "Critical Reception" should stay at "mixed" since the two reviews you posted only mention "Electric Chapel" in passing, while the other sources give in-depth appraisals of the song. Calling the reviews "mostly positive" would be unjust and untrue. --Thevampireashlee (talk) 14:56, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Electric Chapel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120503055340/http://www.koreatimes.co.kr:80/www/news/art/2012/04/143_109924.html to http://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/news/art/2012/04/143_109924.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:46, 22 December 2016 (UTC)