# Talk:Geneforge 2

Small note: Sencia, one of the Awakened from the first game is hiding out (probably spying) in the town of Drypeak. - NemFX 04:11, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Geneforge 2/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 18:25, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

This article is in decent shape, but it needs more work before it becomes a Good Article.
Is it well written?
A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct: 
Well done.
B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation: 
In the lead, "It was released as demoware for the Macintosh on July 24, 2003 and" ---> "It was released as demoware for the Macintosh on July 24, 2003, and", commas after dates, if using MDY. In the Reception section, In the Reception section, the Ken Newquist review, the two hyphens should be changed to a spaced en-dash or unspace em-dash, for more on that go here.
Check.
Is it verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check?
A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline: 

B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose): 

C. It contains no original research: 

D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism: 

Is it broad in its coverage?
A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic: 

B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style): 

Is it neutral?
It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each: 

Is it stable?
It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute: 

Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content: 
File:Geneforge2Logo.png and File:Geneforge 2 roaming 2.png need lower resolutions.
Check.
B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions: 

Overall:
Pass or Fail: 
Not that much to do. If the above can be dealt with, I will pass the article. Good luck!
--  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 18:25, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
I believe that's all taken care of, thanks very much for the review. Someoneanother 23:06, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

Yes, they have, and you're very much welcome for the review, just doing my part. Thank you to Someoneanother for getting the stuff I left at the talk page, because I have gone off and placed the article as GA. Congrats. ;) If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to a GA review. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 17:52, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Geneforge 2. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20091115113524/http://www.gametunnel.com:80/geneforge-2-game-review.php to http://www.gametunnel.com/geneforge-2-game-review.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 02:01, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Geneforge 2. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://imgmagazine.com/misc/product_info.php?List=news&ProductID=615
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101125105633/http://just-rpg.com/default.asp?pid=506 to http://www.just-rpg.com/default.asp?pid=506
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:30, 12 October 2017 (UTC)