# Talk:Lactarius subdulcis

This review is transcluded from Talk:Lactarius subdulcis/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
I think the article is mostly there in terms of meeting the GA criteria. It's very well-written and well-cited. It appears to be mostly complete. Images are tagged with appropriate copyright tags, and there doesn't appear to be any major stability or WP:NPOV issues.
The only issue I see is with the lead section. It's very short, and doesn't really do a good job summarizing the article. If you can expand it and clean it up a bit, I think we've got GA-quality material here. I'll put it on hold for now. Dr. Cash (talk) 22:53, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

I've expanded the lead a little and fixed a typo in the prose- is that better? J Milburn (talk) 23:10, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
Article passed. Dr. Cash (talk) 23:16, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Lactarius subdulcis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081120092212/http://www.rogersmushrooms.com/gallery/DisplayBlock~bid~6346~gid~.asp to http://www.rogersmushrooms.com/gallery/DisplayBlock~bid~6346~gid~.asp
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:55, 15 December 2017 (UTC)