# Talk:Luigi Galleani

Hi @Czar,
I’m reaching out to ask if it would be possible to include the significant ties between Duval and Galleani on the page. If you check the section on Duval’s later years, it’s clear he had important connections with Galleani—who deeply admired him it seems.I’d normally add this myself, but the source (Avrich, p. 98) discussing their relationship is already heavily cited on the page (and it really seems as a solid source for U.S. anarchist circles). I don’t want to disrupt the existing citation format by inserting my own text and referencing style—especially since I suspect the edition I have (you know how I got it) might differ slightly.Still, linking Galleani and Duval seems worthwhile. Their trajectories—two 'vénères' European anarchists ending up in the U.S.—highlight not just the friendship between key figures but also the deeply transnational nature of the movement.Anyway, I’m happy to draft the text if needed, but I wanted to check first to avoid messing up the page’s citation system. Let me know what you think! (I translated this answer into English with DeepSeek but wrote it in French originally) Aristoxène (talk) 14:14, 5 April 2025 (UTC)

@Aristoxène: I wrote this article and got it to GA, so you can ask me. Going off what Avrich says, I think it could be worth adding a sentence or two about their connection, so feel free to add something. Just don't give it undue weight and keep to the same citation style, and there'll be no issues. I can give it a look over and a copy edit if need be. --Grnrchst (talk) 14:37, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
@Grnrchst Oh sorry I didn't know who did it but I looked at like the talk page and saw Czar there so I assumed it was them but nice to know it's you. The issue is that I don't know if it's the same page from the 1998 edition and the one I have, and if I quote, do I use the 1998 edition or the one I have ? Aristoxène (talk) 15:21, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
Added (I hope it's fine by you, I stayed vague and generalistic) - I just don't know if it's the same page but except for that, it should be good (?) Aristoxène (talk) 15:28, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
@Aristoxène: The 1988 edition appears to be identical to the one you seem to have. It's the same page and the same words. --Grnrchst (talk) 15:28, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
Ok great, then it's perfect :) Aristoxène (talk) 15:29, 5 April 2025 (UTC)