# Talk:Codman Carriage House and Stable

This review is transcluded from Talk:Codman Carriage House and Stable/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Kieran207 (talk · contribs) 22:43, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
Hello, I will be reviewing this article. I plan on this review taking 1-3 days for me. Thanks---Kieran207(talk-Contribs) 22:43, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

ALSO:Unless otherwise stated, a Pass within the section denotes a passing of that specific criteria, not the full passing of the article.--Kieran207(talk-Contribs) 23:56, 10 March 2021 (UTC)


### Well Written
The article is well written, Compliant with WP:MOS and is very concise. I give this category a Pass.


### Verifiable with no Original Research
A thorough look at the reference list shows zero WP:SPS, so that's good. All information presented in the prose is in fact verified by a WP:RS. No original research was seen in the article. No plagiarism as far as I can see. Quotes are attributed, everything is cited, I give this category a Pass.


### Broad in it's coverage
The main aspects of the topic are properly adressed. It stays focused while giving a good amount of detail (Although not an innapropiate amount per the summary style). I give this category a Pass


### Neutral
Due weight is given, no bias seen, Pass.


### Stable
No edit warring or massive changes seen recently. The edit history does show some minor vandalism but it has been swiftly reverted. Pass.


### Illustrated
Pictures of the building are shown where necessary. Properly illustrated, Pass.
Well good job! The article has passed, I will be closing this review shortly.--Kieran207(talk-Contribs) 23:56, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

Awesome, thank you very much. APK whisper in my ear 21:47, 11 March 2021 (UTC)


= = =

Thanks for participating in the GA drive, Kieran, but we don't give credit for short reviews which don't give any suggestions for improvement. Did you thoroughly evaluate the sources used for WP:RS? For example, this doesn't look like a reliable source to me.  (t · c) buidhe 04:03, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

Given that Codman was a woman of great wealth and independence, and she commissioned and made the decisions about her home and this support building of stable and apartments by herself, I have changed references to her to use her maiden name through the period of these buildings.  She made these decisions, as well as commissioning a house in Newport, nearly two decades before her marriage at age 69.  Don't take away her own name and history. Parkwells (talk) 22:44, 4 December 2022 (UTC)