# Talk:De Iniusta Vexacione Willelmi Episcopi Primi

This review is transcluded from Talk:De Iniusta Vexacione Willelmi Episcopi Primi/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Nikkimaria (talk) 03:52, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
Hello! I will be reviewing this article for GA status. My review should be posted within the next few days. Cheers, Nikkimaria (talk) 03:52, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

I've decided to promote this article to GA status. Cheers, Nikkimaria (talk) 15:02, 23 October 2010 (UTC)


### Writing and formatting
Headings: "The trial" -> "Trial"
"The work consists of three sections, a central section that details the trial itself, and an introduction and conclusion" - are those the three sections, or are there three sections in addition to those? If the former, replace the first comma with a colon
"Probably it was composed" -> "It was probably composed"


### Accuracy and verifiability
"it was first printed in 1655" - text and infobox both give a date range
Why is "Anglo-Norman Durham" italicized in Citations but not in Sources?
Be consistent in using "Woodbridge" vs "Woodbridge, UK"


### Broad
No issues noted


### Neutrality
No issues noted


### Stability
No issues noted


### Images
Image is PD and appropriately captioned

Book 1 of Monasticon Anglicanum is very long. It would be very helpful to have the section (and approximate page numbers) at which the "De Iniusta Vexation Willelmi Episcopi Primi" is printed. Zoetropo (talk) 06:01, 13 April 2016 (UTC)