# Talk:K-147 (Kansas highway)

This review is transcluded from Talk:K-147 (Kansas highway)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Sammi Brie (talk · contribs) 03:33, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, spelling, and grammar):  b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): 
One thing I'm noticing is that there are some prose sections you use in multiple Kansas highway articles that may not always be the most relevant. Unlike K-156, K-147 itself was not part of an auto trail, and the connection to the National Highway System is tangential. I also feel personally that the traffic counting explanation feels and sounds a bit basic in your form; I tried to streamline it a bit.
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):  d (copyvio and plagiarism): 
The sentence "Rust in the bridge deck was not allowing the bridge to move freely." appears close to this Hays Post article and I'd suggest a reword. Otherwise there are no other copyvio issues.
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 

It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 
Nominator is the only major contributor to the article since expansion work began in April 2020.
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 
There aren't any media in the article, though I can't find any freely available media to provide here, either, unlike with K-156.
Overall:
Pass/Fail: 
I'd like to see the "rust in the bridge deck" sentence tweaked before passing for GA, but it's pretty much there already. Ping me when this is fixed. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 03:48, 2 January 2021 (UTC)


### Comments
@Sammi Brie: I think I fixed the copyright issue properly. Let me know. Thanks, -420Traveler (talk) 15:22, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
@420Traveler: Yes, that looks good. Approving for GA. Hopefully the comments I've made here help improve your other Kansas highway articles! Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 18:00, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
@Sammi Brie: yes they will help me improve other kansas articles, thanks. Im trying to think of a DYK for this article if there is one, wondering if you had any suggestions? Thanks, -420Traveler (talk) 19:56, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
@420Traveler: Honestly, I'm having a hard time thinking of one too. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 23:30, 2 January 2021 (UTC)