# Talk:Nebka

https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=nebka
The article Nabkha already exists; I guess adding hatnotes to both articles is the best solution...
Edit-pi (talk) 23:43, 20 September 2018 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Nebka. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Khruner (talk · contribs) 20:01, 22 April 2019 (UTC)

I believe that the lead is somewhat not concise enough. Compare it with the brief yet splendidly informative lead of Neferhotep I also written by you.
I have cut down on the lead, let me know if this is still too long.Iry-Hor (talk) 20:33, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
ennemies -> enemies.
Done.Iry-Hor (talk) 20:33, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Maybe this is wrong, but when I wrote my one and only Good article, the reviewer told me that the lead, being a summary of the whole subsequent article, does not require citations which would only be a duplicate of those in the article.
Done.Iry-Hor (talk) 20:33, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
It would be nice to standardise the style of dynastic notation, since we have many "Third dynasty" together with "12th Dynasty" etc. Adopting one type over another is a matter of personal taste.
Done.Iry-Hor (talk) 20:33, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
I also believe that each "Dynasty" should be capitalised.
Done.Iry-Hor (talk) 20:33, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
A further picture in the "Tomb" section would be great, if possible. Maybe something from Unfinished Northern Pyramid of Zawyet El Aryan.
Done.Iry-Hor (talk) 20:33, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
I think everything looks fine. The sources are undoubtedly reliable and well used, and the article itself seems to be exhaustive, well written, stable and neutral. Khruner (talk) 16:44, 23 April 2019 (UTC)