# Talk:Lord Fitzhenry

Hi Theleekycauldron, I noticed that you removed the Women's Print History Project as unreliable here. I appreciate your work polishing this article, but that cut surprised me -- can you explain why you think the source is unreliable? ~ L 🌸 (talk) 17:58, 25 July 2025 (UTC)

@LEvalyn: Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think I just moved WPHP and cut the Corvey Novels Project? I cut that one because it looks like it was just an undergraduate project from one class, without the fact-checking or peer-review I'd expect from a reliable source (especially scholarship). theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 18:33, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
Oh! Gotcha, that makes a lot more sense. The Corvey Novels Project is a reasonably established, grant-funded project (explained here), so I understood that to be an essay by a graduate student prepared under the supervision of a PI... which I considered a borderline but plausible place to start for 21stC commentary. But then I found so many better sources that the article has grown beyond it, and the removal makes sense. Thanks for explaining and thanks again for improving the article. ~ L 🌸 (talk) 00:50, 4 August 2025 (UTC)