# Talk:GhostRider (roller coaster)

This review is transcluded from Talk:GhostRider (roller coaster)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Newtothisedit (talk · contribs) 21:08, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
I'll pick this up for review, I will start leaving comments soon.--Newtothisedit (talk) 21:08, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it well written
A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct: 

B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation: 

Is it verifiable with no original research
A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline: 

B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines: 

C. It contains no original research: 

D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism: 

Is it broad in its coverage?
A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic: 

B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style): 

Is it neutral
It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each: 

Is it stable
It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute: 

Is it illustrated, if possible, by images
A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content: 

B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions: 


### Comments
Add caption to image in infobox
Done. Epicgenius (talk) 17:20, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
"There are three trains, each themed to a different precious metal, though only two are in use" add that only two are in use at a given time as stated later in article. Current wording makes it seem that one train is broken or discontinued.
Done. Epicgenius (talk) 17:20, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
"Knott's vice president for maintenance and construction at the time, Robin Hall, said he wanted the project to accomplish two goals. According to Hall, the ride would serve as a "billboard" for the park on Beach Boulevard, along the park's eastern boundary, while relocating warehouses to free up space for the new attraction." I'd try to combine these two sentences, right now they don't flow very well.
I have combined the sentences, but the sentence is now pretty long. I agree the sentences were pretty clunky, but that might've been because the wording "accomplish two goals" is redundant, rather than because these are two sentences. Epicgenius (talk) 17:20, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
"but the ride ultimately reopened on June 11" add year (2016)
Done. Epicgenius (talk) 17:20, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
"The ride's official backstory involves a Union Army soldier who moved to a California mining town during a gold rush. in pursuit of gold" Remove unnecessary period.
I've fixed this by rewording the sentence. Epicgenius (talk) 17:20, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
"The ride's station is three stories high and is themed to a mining company's building" to "The ride's station is three stories high and is themed as a mining company's building"
I have fixed this now. I think I got a couple of ideas mixed up in my head when writing this - the station is themed to mining, and it is designed to resemble a mining-company building. Epicgenius (talk) 17:20, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
Overall very informative and well written article.--23:49, 25 October 2022 (UTC)Newtothisedit (talk)

@Newtothisedit: Thanks for the feedback. I really appreciate it. I've now fixed all the issues you raised. Epicgenius (talk) 17:20, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
Looks good, I'll pass the article. Newtothisedit (talk) 22:12, 27 October 2022 (UTC)