# Talk:Fox Terrier

Are they called terriers because they're used to terrorize the fox out of its hole? Kent Wang 11:00, 13 May 2004 (UTC)

No the Terrier part comes from the latin terra meaning earth. Steven jones 11:12, 13 May 2004 (UTC)
Thanks for the explanation. Do you think this warrants mention in the article? I'm not so sure of how to put it eloquently. Kent Wang 18:07, 28 May 2004 (UTC)
It's already in the Terrier article. I don't see a need to repeat it in each of the dozens of individual terrier breeds. Elf | Talk 18:57, 28 May 2004 (UTC)

Nice edit Quill. I changed the headings from being bold text to an actual heading. You can do this by placing "==" arround the text, the benifit in actual headings is that the arcticle will have a table of contents.
I also removed the stub message as the article seems to have reached actual article status. What is still outstanding is that it doesn't match the project standards. I'm not sure if it really should though as it has become an article about the various foxies and not one specific breed. I'm not sure how we should do this from a format point of view? Steven jones 12:22, 15 Jun 2004 (UTC)

We've probably been a little inconsistent with breeds that have very similar types & names.  It's sometimes tough to decide whether there's enough difference among the breeds to warrant having separate articles.  For example, Welsh Corgi provides general info about both the Welsh Corgi (Cardigan) and Welsh Corgi (Pembroke), but specific breed details are in the individual articles.  For Dachshund, however, all the breeds and standards and coat variations and sizes are listed in one single article.  I think it's "what feels best for the particular breed group." Elf | Talk 17:44, 15 Jun 2004 (UTC)
Thanks, Steven.  Yes, I agree with Elf.  These decisions are difficult and we should probably let them evolve.  Elf, thanks for fixing the formatting error on my Jack Russell stub page.  I realized to late what I'd done, thought I'd tackle it this morning, and voila, it's been corrected!  Wikipedia is amazing! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Quill (talk • contribs) .
Isn't it!  :-)  Elf | Talk 02:32, 16 Jun 2004 (UTC)

I notice with mortification that the Quillster forgot to sign his name again.  I'll get, it, folks--sorry!
This is a nice full article now, but one glaring omission is the lack of breed articles on the Smooth and Wire-haired Foxies (yes, I know that's not how the breed name is written, but I just can't help myself).
If any Standard Fox Terrier owners read this, they're likely to take offence.  I haven't written an article because I'm not an expert on Standard Foxies.  Can we at least have a stub?
Did I just volunteer? Everybody say "no"....  Quill 05:19, 18 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Can someone please add "wire" to the caption of  the photo of the foxy in the snow?  Also, this photo should be copied into fox terrier (wire) wire fox terrier or whatever we've called that article; I've forgotten.  Quill 22:59, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)

p.s. I see that there should be another photo as well, but I can't view it because my uploader isn't uploading.  I look forward to seeing it eventually....Quill 23:22, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Uh, my failure. Sorry. I reverted to the last version. It's called Fox Terrier (Wire) :-). --Avatar-en 01:40, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC)

I see we're having a little conflict with a standard foxy breeder or enthusiast (anon).  Look, we know that photo is not of a smooth fox terrier.  It is a generic type.  The point was that it had mixed characteristics of the descendent FT breeds.  I'm sorry to see it go, as it was a good illustration in the right context.  People who want to write only about one particular breed, please see the proper specific article, i.e. Fox Terrier Smooth, Toy Fox Terrier and so on. Quill 23:56, 2 February 2006 (UTC)

(From User talk:Elf): Thanks, Elf - I'm not sure that the color info (genetics of fox terrier color--Elf moved from Smooth article to main Fox Terrier article) shouldn't be in each variety, but it isn't a major issue. I have loads more info on color genetics if anyone would be interested. I used to give talks to Fox Terrier clubs on it, and I was the Breeders/Judges Education coordinator for the American Fox Terrier Club and SFT presenter for a while. Thanks for cleaning up my stuff - I'm a newbie at the wiki submissions. Hope I'm doing this right! 
Tialin 03:28, 3 February 2006 (UTC)Tialin

(From User talk:Tialin):  That was good info you added. I think it's better to have it in the main JRT article because presumably it applies to all varieties of Fox Terriers and so it's better to have one article that goes into detail about it rather than trying to maintain 4 or more identical versions of the same text.  I did add an explicit note to each article about going to the main Fox Terrier article for details.  I think more info might be excellent. Not many articles go into details about the genetic reasons for various colors, but it's mostly because that info's not widely available and/or most people don't know much about it.  Dobermann has some similar stuff.  I'd suggest watching terms that laypersons aren't going to understand right off the bat and either explaining (briefly) or trying to figure out where to link to them in WP.  Elf | Talk 05:31, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
(From User talk:Elf): Couple of things - first, I'm sure it was just a mistake, the main page would be Fox Terrier, not JRT. 
There are not four varieties of Fox Terrier, only two, and the standards of Smooths and Wires do differ in several aspects - they are two separate breeds with common ancestors and similarities, but many differences. The Wire Fox Terrier Standard was amended to reflect the differences between the breeds, much more than merely coat.
The only two varieties of true Fox Terrier are Smooth and Wire. The breeds were originally one breed with two varieties, and were once interbred before being officially split in the AKC in the '80s. Smooths and Wires may no longer be registered if interbred, and in practice have not been interbred for decades. 
Not so for the ones I assume you refer to as the other two of four varieties, Parson Jack Russells (formerly known by AKC as Jack Russell Terriers) and Toy Fox Terriers. Neither of these two breeds has been interbred with true Fox Terriers for at least one hundred years. While they share common breeds as ancestors (what breed doesn't, if you go back far enough?) it is not correct to refer to those last mentioned breeds as varieties of Fox Terrier (despite the misnamed Toy Fox) any more than it would be to refer to a Doberman Pinscher as a variety of Rottweiler or other breeds used to create it!  
Perhaps Toy Fox Terriers have employed Smooth Fox Terriers at some point, but they are much more related to several other Toy breeds than Fox Terriers, and no reputable breeder would ever allow a Fox Terrier to be bred with any Toy Fox Terrier, any more than to be crossbred with any other breed. Nothing against TFTs, it's just that if the parents aren't the same breed, the dog is basically a mutt. Unike cats, the days of creating new breeds are pretty much over. Labradoodles (expensive MUTTS! notwithstanding.
The American Fox Terrier Club does not represent or promote JRT, PRT or Toy Fox Terriers, nor do any other Fox Terrier clubs in the world. These breeds have their own organizations and completely separate standards. They are NOT Fox Terriers. Similarly, German Pinschers and Minature Pinschers are not varieties of Doberman Pinschers, despite common elements of naming.
I think you would be better off removing the Fox Terrier page other than as a referral point for Smooths and Wires, etc, since there really is no Fox Terrier breed any more. I don't believe they compete together (apart from in the Terrier Group) or are interbred any more anywhere in the world.
As for the color inheritance of JRTs, PRTs or TFTs, I imagine it might be similar, but can't speak to that with any certainty.
And as for genetic terms, I'll go through and try to link them to the proper places in the Wiki. Is there a way to display a superscript? The alleles are all designated as s superscipt p, etc. I need to read the style sheets, etc, I guess.
Thanks for your help!
Tialin 01:15, 6 February 2006 (UTC)Tialin

Yup, you're right, "JRT" was a brain hiccup above and I mean "Fox Terrier".  The 4 varieties I referred to were the Wire, Smooth, Toy, and Miniature.  I'm goint to move our discussion so far to Talk:Fox Terrier so the explanations and discussions are preserved somewhere where they can be found. :-)  Elf | Talk 16:44, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
I look at the Origin section of that article and the coat color info you added and it seems to me that those apply to all four breeds, no? It's challenging to try to maintain the same text in 4 different places accurately.  One alternative might be to move this page to something like Fox Terrier history and then turn Fox Terrier into a simple disambiguation page listing Wire, Smooth, Toy, Min...and Standard?...  That might be a lot clearer, actually, although it would be the first time it's been done among the dog breeds. (That doesn't make it wrong, of course, just--different. :-) )  The more I think about this possibility, the more I like it.
Let me know what you think (and others sometimes weigh in, too); to my eye (not a FT expert), pretty much everything currently on this page applies to all 4 "fox terrier" named breeds.
As for superscript, there's no magic, just the usual HTML markup s<sup>p</sup>.  Elf | Talk 16:44, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
Weighing in here.  Tialin, if the basis of your argument is any variation on the theme "they-aren't-recognized-by-the-AKC/KC/FCI so-therefore-they-aren't-a-breed" I must tell you that that one has been discussed and debated for a couple of years now, and, while nothing is cast in stone, the members of the DogProject (which I cordially invite you to join) have a general consensus about including bona fide dog breeds whether or not they have kennel club affiliation.
I appreciate that you are a member and/or spokesperson for the AFTC, and I recognize that the AFTC assigns specific and limited meaning to the words "Fox Terrier".  If, however, you are going to assert that that is the ONLY meaning to the words, I have to point out that the scholarship of many others is against you.  Some of the points you make are partially true, some are completely inaccurate, and some are red herrings--where, for example, has anyone suggested the cross-breeding of Toy Fox Terriers with Fox Terriers, Smooth?
If the established Fox Terrier breeders of modern kennel clubs date the Fox Terrier from the date of establishment of the Fox Terrier Club, or something close to it, that is their business.  If they wish to ignore the claims of other inheritors of the title, that is also their business, but as a historian I must attempt to inject the known facts into any work with which I am associated.
The KC, London, recognized the Parson Russell as a working variant of the Fox Terrier.  Since those are the same good folks who first officially recognized the Fox Terrier, we must allow that they know what they're talking about.
Working Jack Russell Terrier enthusiasts call their dogs "Fox Terriers".
Toy Fox Terriers and Miniature Fox Terriers are indeed descended from Fox Terriers; some can trace their lineage back to early registered dogs.
I'm not going to debate the rights and wrongs of these positions, merely to point out that they exist and, if we're serious about what we're doing here, they deserve commensurate mention.
Quill 04:12, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
p.s. Elf, you may be onto something with your suggestion.  Allow me to toss it about in my beleagured brain for a bit. Quill 04:12, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
Yes, and then the "Fox Terrier history" page could spell out where &when the breeds diverged, which would make it even clearer that they're quite different today.  Elf | Talk 04:46, 7 February 2006 (UTC)

"However, they have an irrational hatred of winged creatures." I'm just really skeptical of this line. It seems to have been added as part of a legitimate edit, but it strikes me as being dubious. 70.225.161.251 (talk) 03:37, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

Agreed, i have removed it. It should be cited if it is that questionable/contentious. Mfield (Oi!) 04:15, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

Thought I should pop a note on the talk page regarding the recent overhaul of the page. I'd been working on this version for a couple of months and had it sitting in userspace. Theres still some improvements that could be done. The two main flaws I see at the moment is that the health section isn't very complete and that the Smooth Fox Terrier related sections talk about the Westminster Show a little too much. Some of those westminstery bits could be combined.  But I'll get around to it. Miyagawa (talk) 09:57, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Fox Terrier/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Anna talk 16:16, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
Hi, I'll be starting this review shortly.

Fixed three disambiguation links.
Updated urls for two dead links.
Anna talk 16:16, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Thanks for your patience; I lost the almost-complete review and had to start from scratch. Overall, everything looks good and the main issues are matters of presentation, not content.
Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality: 

The opening sentence is quite long. Can it be split?
"In addition, a number of breeds have diverged from these two main breeds and have been recognised separately in a number of countries around the world, including the Jack Russell Terrier, Miniature Fox Terrier and Rat Terrier." -- Remove "around the world" as it's redundant. Sentence as it's worded right now seems to be listing the countries, not the breeds, so could be shuffled a bit. Somewhat repetitive since the word "breed" is used twice.
"The Wire and Smooth Fox Terriers share similar characteristics with the main differences being in the coat and markings of each breed." -- Insert comma after "characteristics", remove "with", remove "of each breed".
"They have been successful in conformation shows, although are more successful in America than in their homeland." -- "Successful" used twice.
Last sentence in lead could be removed since it's a bit of a given.
"Small dogs were observed by the Romans in England in 54 B.C. being used by hunters to chase quarry into burrows and dens, describing the instinctive terrier behaviour of "going to earth"." -- Seems to say the small dogs were describing terrier behavior.
"The earliest record of any white terrier named Pitch, who was owned by Colonel Thomas Thornton in 1790." -- This isn't a complete sentence.
"An engraving prior to 1810 was made of a painting by Sawrey Gilpin, who painted the dog from life." -- Slightly clunky.
"During the early part of the 19th century, not much is known of the breeding practices that came to create the modern Fox Terrier." -- Restructure: "Not much is known of early 19th century breeding practices..."
"Three dogs are where most of the modern strains of white terriers have descended from. These three dogs were known as Old Jock, Trap and Tartar." -- Condense: "Three dogs, known as Old Jock, Trap and Tartar, are the ancestors of most modern strains of white terrier."
"Used in hunting packs and kept in kennels along with English Foxhounds, they were used to hunt foxes. Bred at this time for ability rather than to a modern show standard, they were used to drive the fox out of its den." -- These can be combined for clarity.
"There are two originating breeds of Fox Terrier, Smooth and Wire, both of which originate in England." -- Repetitive (originate, originating).
"In addition, there are several descendant breeds which have been developed in a variety of countries, which have included one or the other originating breeds in their development." -- Second clause is redundant. If they're descendant breeds, we already know that a main breed was used in development.
"Markings on either types can appear black at birth on the head, but may change color in later adult life, the most common colors for the markings are either black or tan." Comma splice, typo, redundancy, some repetition. If this doesn't alter the meaning, I suggest: "Markings on either type can appear black at birth on the head, but may lighten in adult life, the most common colors being tan and black."
"This is where the annual registrations with The Kennel Club (UK) is less than 300 per breed." -- Change to something like: "This is when there are fewer than 300 annual registrations with The Kennel Club."
Best in Show should be capitalized.
"it is yet to win again since" -- Awkward. Could be changed to something like "it has not won since".
"In a survey conducted by The Kennel Club, the primary cause of death for Fox Terriers was old age, causing 31.8% of reported deaths; with a median age at death of thirteen years and two months." -- Change semicolon to period and move the last clause, modified, to the end of the paragraph (before last sentence) for better continuity. I'm assuming that median is not limited to old age deaths.
I'd remove "thought to be" in the last sentence if that's not placing too much confidence in the source, since I suspect it may be tagged with  later.
Make sure British English is used consistently throughout.
B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists: 

Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources: 

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary: 
Look good for the most part. I've seen several websites (like breed clubs) and hits in Google Books that could replace instances of Sarah's Dogs, and it would be ideal to use those. Let me know if I can help by giving more info. For example, I believe Cunliffe has an entry on the Brazilian Terrier.
C. No original research: 

Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects: 

B. Focused: 

Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias: 

Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc: 

Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales: 

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions: 

Overall:
Pass or Fail: 
I'll pass this as soon as the issues mentioned are addressed; it'll be  On hold until then. Anna talk 22:58, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
I'll place my comments down here - had tried to insert them directly after yours but for whatever reason they weren't showing. They're in exactly the same order as your comments.

Reworded it and dropped the world/countries bit entirely. Once I read your comment I couldn't help but think that the countries were about to be listed when I read the original prose.
Reworded to "They have been successful in conformation shows, although more prominently in America than in their homeland."
Dropped that sentence and merged the second paragraph into the first as it was otherwise a bit short.
That would have been quite clever of them! :) Changed to "demonstrating".
That's my brain thinking faster than I can type. Changed to "The earliest record of any white terrier was a dog named Pitch, who was owned by Colonel Thomas Thornton in 1790."
Reworded it quite a bit.
Done.
Completed up until ""There are two originating breeds of Fox Terrier, Smooth and Wire, both of which originate in England." -- Repetitive (originate, originating)." Will fix everything else once I'm back home tonight (the joys of a lunch break!). Miyagawa (talk) 13:40, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
Ok, here we go again.

Replaced originate with main.
Removed second part of sentence as suggested.
Changed as suggested.
Changed as suggested.
Best in Show is now capitalised throughout.
Changed as suggested.
Changed as suggested.
Done.
Addressing the Sarah's Dogs replacements at the moment. Will add a note once they're replaced. Miyagawa (talk) 18:18, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

Ok, cleared out the last of the Sarah's Dogs references. I think everything is covered now. :) Miyagawa (talk) 18:39, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
All looks good now. I've just gone through and changed everything to British English where possible as some areas were using American spellings. I'm not familiar with every intricacy there, so I hope I didn't miss anything -- could you verify? Everything looks great otherwise; thanks for your prompt replies. :) Anna talk 17:12, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
Put it through the Microsoft Word UK spellcheck and nothing else came up - forgot the browser one was in US English. Also added the British English template to the talk page. Miyagawa (talk) 11:51, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
Sounds good. I've now passed it -- congrats and nice job. Anna talk 15:04, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Fox Terrier. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20081015050835/http://www.dogworld.co.uk:80/Supplements to http://www.dogworld.co.uk/Supplements
Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110717181320/http://www.utrtca.com/files/History_from_Teddy_Roosevelt_definitive91510.pdf to http://www.utrtca.com/files/History_from_Teddy_Roosevelt_definitive91510.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 09:34, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Fox Terrier. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110706124035/http://www.ankc.org.au/Breed_Details.aspx?bid=212 to http://www.ankc.org.au/Breed_Details.aspx?bid=212
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:57, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Fox Terrier. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100401235849/http://www.jack-russell-terrier.co.uk/breed/types_of_terriers.html to http://www.jack-russell-terrier.co.uk/breed/types_of_terriers.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:11, 5 October 2017 (UTC)