# Talk:Emeliana Aiza

The articles seems to impart real information in a way that doesn’t add context to the subject of the article. 2605:8D80:408:269B:B010:48E8:E01D:A5D6 (talk) 05:38, 4 October 2023 (UTC)

Your comment is incomprehensible. —Alalch E. 07:15, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
If my understanding is correct, you're saying some supplemental information in the article doesn't necessarily inform about the subject themselves? I suppose I can see that, especially in my mention of candidate selection mechanisms in Potosí or the aside on tensions over the gasolinazo. It's just my style to add additional context where I can, as I believe interesting asides enhance the article and give readers a broader perspective. Krisgabwoosh (talk) 07:22, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
Although, I'm not sure what this has to do with article neutrality. Krisgabwoosh (talk) 07:24, 4 October 2023 (UTC)

This is an article about a Bolivian politician, yet none of the mentions of Bolivia link back to the page on Bolivia.
Why is this? I've noticed similar things on other articles. What's the rule on this? DontLikeRedesign (talk) 12:53, 4 October 2023 (UTC)

@DontLikeRedesign: At least for me, I generally don't link countries in articles, per MOS:OVERLINK, which includes nations in its list of subjects most readers are likely already familiar with. My interpretation is that if someone is reading an article about a Bolivian politician, they're probably at least somewhat knowledgeable about what Bolivia is. Krisgabwoosh (talk) 15:03, 4 October 2023 (UTC)