# Talk:Lauren Ebsary

There seem to be quite a few unsourced bits that don't relate to stats, such as "The WNCL was expanded in 2009–10 with the addition of the Australian Capital Territory, so ten round-robin matches were scheduled,..." There are enough of these that I'm not sure how I would handle it at GAN. Comments? hamiltonstone (talk) 00:05, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

Sure, I'll ref them with the schedules YellowMonkey  (vote in the Southern Stars and White Ferns supermodel photo poll)  04:38, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
OK. BTW, the example i gave was jsut illustrative. IIRC, other examples i don't think related to schedules - have a run through and see what you think. Cheers, hamiltonstone (talk) 04:48, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
Well I've given it another run-through. It's annoying with raw stats, because when you point out NSW are the titleholders, you have to link to a pile of other pages. If you mean about them not making the final, I explicitly referenced it rather than just rely on the fact that two further games didn't pop up on the list. Did you mean winning margins, averages and stuff? I just got them by subtracting/divding numbers  from the webpages as it seems worthless to type up a new webcite for every single game. Else I'm carking it. If you meant the comments about productivity going up and down, they were just stats as well, because there is basically no media coverage otherwise. YellowMonkey (bananabucket!) 06:24, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Lauren Ebsary/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: ɳorɑfʈ Talk! 05:31, 24 April 2010 (UTC) 

Review begin. Will be in touch shortly. ɳorɑfʈ Talk! 05:31, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
To be honest, I can't find anything that needs improvement. This leads me to believe that I should seek a second opinion. If I pass it without changes right before the elimination drive ends, I'm sure someone will cry foul. ɳorɑfʈ Talk! 17:03, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
Looks good to me. I made a couple of minor copy-edits. Prose is "reasonably well written", there is always room for improvement, but it is clear and grammatical, MOS OK, images OK, referencing OK, broad - she is still an active player so it can be expanded as time goes on, NPOV. Recommend a pass. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 23:42, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Lauren Ebsary. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091017053301/http://www.southernstars.org.au/wcanl99.htm to http://www.southernstars.org.au/wcanl99.htm
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091017053709/http://www.southernstars.org.au/wcanl00.htm to http://www.southernstars.org.au/wcanl00.htm
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091017053104/http://www.southernstars.org.au/wcanl01.htm to http://www.southernstars.org.au/wcanl01.htm
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091017053352/http://www.southernstars.org.au/wcanl02.htm to http://www.southernstars.org.au/wcanl02.htm
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091017053535/http://www.southernstars.org.au/wcanl03.htm to http://www.southernstars.org.au/wcanl03.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:44, 18 December 2017 (UTC)