# Talk:Em (restaurant)

@Skywatcher68: since you are siding with an user that keeps disrupting the page, can you point out where the advertised content is located? (CC) Tbhotch™ 20:30, 16 July 2024 (UTC)

At first glance, the Description and History sections appeared to be overly promotional but, after comparing with some other articles about highly-rated restaurants, I'm not so sure.   –Skywatcher68 (talk) Skywatcher68 (talk) 20:34, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
Unfortunately, that's the only commentary found discussing the restaurant's history and description as of today. I write articles with the content that exists in a neutral manner, regardless if positive, neutral or negative, for example Pujol (restaurant)#Criticism. The history and description describe the restaurant in a neutral way. It is just about the dining and how the restaurant surged.
The IP that keeps disrupting the article, however, doesn't seem to understand the difference between WP:NOTPROMO and Wikipedia:Funding Wikipedia through advertisements. The article meets WP:NCORP (specifically WP:RESTAURANTREVIEWS) and NOTPROMO: "Information about companies and products must be written in an objective and unbiased style, free of puffery." Funding Wikipedia, the essay this person keeps using as a excuse to disrupt after multiple blocks, is about why Wikipedia doesn't add advert banners. It is also the same person that performed this edit to the Joe Biden 1988 presidential campaign, which is ironically questionable and reduces that editor's credibility.
Finally, Good article icons are not removed, even if the articles don't meet the good article criteria. There is a process (WP:GAR) that has to be fulfilled first.
If you or anyone (but I doubt that IP will do it) would like to start a GAR, AFD, or alike process (in the name of that IP person, which is what they seem to try to do when they say "This problem needs to be addressed in a serious administrative level", you can do it at the respective venues. Otherwise, the editor will continue disrupting until they get tired or the page results protected. (CC) Tbhotch™ 21:01, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
I'm primarily a Recent Changes Patroller and lost interest after investigating those other articles. :-)   –Skywatcher68 (talk) 21:09, 16 July 2024 (UTC)

@Tbhotch: Maybe you prefer otherwise, but I'd be ok with the article having a second image in the Reception section, if you think there's one you'd like to add. Thanks again for your work on this article! ---Another Believer (Talk) 19:15, 7 September 2025 (UTC)