# Talk:Nenjil Or Aalayam

This review is transcluded from Talk:Nenjil Or Aalayam/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Dr. Blofeld (talk · contribs) 07:29, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

Will look at this shortly, I've been busy with Sinatra!♦ Dr. Blofeld 16:40, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality: 
B. MoS compliance: 
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources: 
B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary: 
C. No original research: 
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects: 
B. Focused: 
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias: 
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc: 
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales: 
B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions: 
Overall:
Pass or Fail: 
Couldn't see much wrong with it, I fixed 5 or 6 things myself I think to save you doing it. Good effort.♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:19, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

@Dr. Blofeld Thank you very much, Dr. Blofeld. Thamizhan1994 (Appo Pesu) 03:37, 5 October 2015 (UTC)