# Talk:Jim Kilburn

This review is transcluded from Talk:Jim Kilburn/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Sahara4u (talk · contribs) 23:34, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
Comments –

Use ndashes (–) instead of hyphens (-) in dates' ranges.
Well spotted: bad mistake! Fixed now. Sarastro1 (talk) 17:44, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
"He bowled fast-paced off spin." needs a ref.
The ref was at the end of the next sentence. I've linked them to make it clear. Sarastro1 (talk) 17:44, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
You may link Barnsley Chronicle and the Yorkshire Post.
Latter one done now, but I'd prefer to leave the Barnsley Chronicle as there is no article and I don't see the purpose of a red link for a borderline-notability article. Sarastro1 (talk) 17:44, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
"Kilburn's writings on the Yorkshire players of the 1930s and 1940s made them well-known to the public as personalities and he wrote several pieces for the Yorkshire Post which became well-known." comma after personalities
Done. Sarastro1 (talk) 17:44, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
You may link England team and Australia.
Did the first; the second is not the team, and linking the country would be overlinking. Sarastro1 (talk) 17:44, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
Don't you think the Bibliography section needs a ref?
For a bibliography section, the books serve as their own reference, as I understand it. Sarastro1 (talk) 17:44, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
Overall good work, very well-written. I really enjoyed it. Zia Khan 23:34, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

I'm busy right now, will take a look later today. Zia Khan 17:50, 28 January 2013 (UTC)


### Final assessment
GA review (see Wikipedia:Good article criteria and WP:GACN)
Well written.
a (clear and concise prose which doesn't violate copyright laws, grammar and spelling are correct):  b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, and fiction: 

Factually accurate and verifiable.
a (well-referenced):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (Wikipedia:No original research): 

Broad in its coverage.
a (covers major aspects):  b (well-focused): 

Neutral .
Fair representation, no bias: 

Stable.
No edit wars nor disputed contents: 

Illustrated appropriately by images.
a  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 

Conclusion: No other issues. Good work, keep it up! Zia Khan 21:59, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
Pass/Fail: