# Talk:HMS Amazon (1799)

This review is transcluded from Talk:HMS Amazon (1799)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Hi, I am reviewing this article for GA and have copy edited it. Please feel free to revert any errors I introduced. Although this article is short, it tells a good story in a clear style. —Mattisse (Talk) 22:23, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): Clearly written  b (MoS): Follows relevant MoS 

It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): Well referenced   b (citations to reliable sources): Sources are reliable   c (OR): No OR 

It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): Covers major areas   b (focused): Remains focused on topic 

It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: Neutral  

It is stable.
No edit wars etc.: Stable 

It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 

Overall:
Pass/Fail: Pass 

Congratulations!
—Mattisse (Talk) 22:23, 7 July 2009 (UTC)