# Talk:Eliab Harvey

Removed these from the page as they are not considered reliable enough. They do however provide some interesting information.--Jackyd101 (talk) 23:04, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

Sir Eliab Harvey bio
Animation of the Battle of Trafalgar

GA review (see here for criteria)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose):  b (MoS): 
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 
It is stable.
No edit wars etc.: 
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 
Overall:
Pass/Fail: 
See if something can be done about all the red links. Overall, a good article. -- Secisek (talk) 06:33, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

Virtually all the red links are for warships and MPs who are automatically notable, so the redlinks will eventually change to blue.  Of course as WP:Anglicanism members, it's probably up to us to work out if the church is sufficiently notable... Incidentally, whilst it is indeed frowened upon to use flags for places of birth and death (at least partly because, there are questions of self-identification and historical accuracy) there does seem to be a consensus to use them for Allegiance and Branch as these are well-defined matters of fact.  David Underdown (talk) 08:52, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
Well, I did my part. The chuch article is stubbed in. -- Secisek (talk) 08:21, 20 March 2008 (UTC)