# Talk:Fake Your Death

This review is transcluded from Talk:Fake Your Death/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: Leafy46 (talk · contribs) 17:55, 27 August 2025 (UTC)
Reviewer: MarioSoulTruthFan (talk · contribs) 22:45, 3 November 2025 (UTC)


### Infobox
Needs alt
Y Did my best, because I can't really tell what the artwork is supposed to be of lol.


### Lead
various others. → various other charts.
Y Done


### Background and release
album[1] under the working title of The Paper Kingdom.[2] → album under the working title of The Paper Kingdom.[1][2]
Y Done
February 17, 2014,[8] and was released to iTunes as a single the same day.[9] → February 17, 2014, and was released to iTunes as a single the same day.[8][9]
Y Done
There is a bit confusion regarding the release. Should add streaming services here as well, besides iTunes
? What is the confusion regarding the release? The source only says that it was released to iTunes, and doesn't say anything about its release to other streaming services
"A representative from Warner Bros. has confirmed on Twitter that the single will be available at digital retailers other than iTunes, but “[probably] not until Tues." → you have it as well on the Release History. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 01:00, 5 November 2025 (UTC)
Gotcha, I can add that point into the prose. Leafy46 (talk) 02:32, 5 November 2025 (UTC)
 Done

My Chemical Romance's YouTube channel on the same day. → source?
Y Billboard. It was cited at the end of the next sentence, but I don't mind adding one in here.


### Composition and lyrics
Good job!


### Reception
placed the song at #43 of 71 →  placed the song at number 43 out of 71
Y Done
Gigwise placed the song at #53 of 79 → same as previous
Y Done
UK Rock & Metal Singles Chart,[20] → source at the end of sentence
N Not done. Keeping the source next to the chart it refers to is common in FAs; see, for instance, Diamonds (Rihanna song)#Commercial performance, Blank Space#Release and commercial performance, and Not in Love (Crystal Castles song)#Commercial performance.
reached #63 →  reached a peak position of 63
Y Done
The song also appeared on the Mexico Ingles Airplay chart (45),[22] the US Hot Rock & Alternative Songs chart (47),[23] → The song also appeared on the Mexico Ingles Airplay chart (45), the US Hot Rock & Alternative Songs chart (47).[22][23]
N Not done; see above.
the Finnish Airplay chart (49),[24] and the Czech Republic's Rádio – Top 100 chart (66).[25] → In Europe, the track peaked at number 49 on the Finnish Airplay chart and reached number 66 on the Czech Republic's Rádio – Top 100 chart.[24][25]
N Not done; see above.
Regarding that issue 4 Minutes, City of Blinding Lights and What You Waiting For? All of this show what I told you, I can't find the exact policy for it, because it seems to be up to taste. I was just saying so it doesn't break the sentence with a source in the middle, since there are only two charts its easy to see and doesn't clog the full stop with like 7 or 10 sources at the end.  MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 01:16, 5 November 2025 (UTC)
I see your point. I still kinda prefer having the sources interspersed into a sentence, but in the interest of collaboration I will make the changes accordingly. Leafy46 (talk) 02:40, 5 November 2025 (UTC)
I can see where you are coming from, but I think if its up to three sources it's easy to search. More than that, then I guess your suggestion is the best outcome possible. Anyway, Thanks! MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 12:39, 5 November 2025 (UTC)
All  Done. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 12:40, 5 November 2025 (UTC)


### Credits and personnel
Use  – instead of - (click to copy)
Y Added the non-breaking spaces, but the use of an en dash instead of a hyphen was already correct?


### Charts
Scottish source does not provide a position, find a archived source with the chart position.
Not done. For one, Scotland Singles uses the template such that you can't add an archived link to it. Additionally, the position is assumed by counting downwards from the top; this is the case in featured articles like 4 Minutes, Under the Bridge, and Irreplaceable.
I see, that seems to be an issue that we might need a bot on wiki to tackle. Fine as it is.  Done


### Release history
Fine


### References
All sources reliable


#### Books
Fine


#### Sources
Overlink
Other than the two below, are there any other examples of incorrect/over-linking? The Billboard and Official Charts Company ones are beyond my control since those one are created by templates, but they are commonly left linked.
No, only the two bellow. I just made that note
Wikilink Kerrang! on its first instance and not tenth
Y Fixed
Remove the second wikilink of NME (source 11)
Y Fixed


### Overall
Just let me know once you have finished addressing the issues. I will give it a second look MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 22:17, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
@MarioSoulTruthFan: Thank you for your quick review of this article! I believe that I have addressed all of your points above, let me know if there's anything else I need to do. Leafy46 (talk) 23:52, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
You welcome, already left two notes. We are almost there. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 01:17, 5 November 2025 (UTC)
Your two new notes should be addressed. Leafy46 (talk) 02:42, 5 November 2025 (UTC)
All done! I only made a small change on the Lead, let me know if you are ok with it and if so it is a pass. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 12:37, 5 November 2025 (UTC)
I've split up that sentence into two, just to avoid it becoming a run-on. I think it should be all good :) Leafy46 (talk) 17:08, 5 November 2025 (UTC)
Pass MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 17:16, 5 November 2025 (UTC)