# Talk:Educationally subnormal

Hi Llewee, the article should be at Educationally subnormal, see WP:NCCAPS, do you mind if I move it? The DYK nomination does not need to be moved, but the hook should say "educationally subnormal" in lower case. TSventon (talk) 20:49, 19 February 2023 (UTC)

Fixed--Llewee (talk) 21:45, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
Should the GA nomination listing be updated? Otherwise the GA review page will have the wrong capitalisation. TSventon (talk) 22:17, 19 February 2023 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Educationally subnormal/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: SyntheticSystems (talk · contribs) 20:52, 21 February 2023 (UTC)


### Criteria
### Review
Well-written:

Verifiable with no original research:

Broad in its coverage:

Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.

Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.

Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:


#### Result
Hi SyntheticSystems, thank you for reviewing the article. I've added images. Do you think any other changes are needed to the article?--Llewee (talk) 23:45, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
I think you could expand the lead a little bit. SyntheticSystems (talk) 17:11, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
Hi SyntheticSystems, what do you think of the article now?--Llewee (talk) 00:39, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Looks good. I think you might need page numbers for the first reference. SyntheticSystems (talk) 17:37, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
SyntheticSystems, It's quite a short paper and the relevant parts span pretty much the whole thing.--Llewee (talk) 14:40, 28 February 2023 (UTC)