# Talk:Delaware Route 62

This review is transcluded from Talk:Delaware Route 62/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Imzadi1979 (talk · contribs) 16:34, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
Dabs and ELs look good.
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose):  b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): 
Looks good.
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 
Looks good as well.
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 
Given the length of this highway, the content could be padded slightly with the AADT and NHS information.
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 
Rare to see otherwise in highway articles.
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 
I fixed the caption for you because it wasn't a full sentence, it didn't need a period.
Overall:
Pass/Fail: 
I'm passing, but still recommending that the above suggestion be implemented. Imzadi 1979 →  17:19, 10 February 2012 (UTC)