# Talk:Gone for Goode

This review is transcluded from Talk:Gone for Goode/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: –– Jezhotwells (talk) 20:03, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.
Disambiguations: none found
Link rot: no dead links found


### Checking against GA criteria
GA review (see here for criteria)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose):  b (MoS): 
A scene involving a funeral accidentally exhuming the wrong body while investigating the Church case mirrored a similar situation described in Homicide: A Year on the Killing Streets from the Parrish case "a funeral accidentally exhuming the wrong body"? Do we mean an undertaker or a funeral director here?  Done
I made a number of minor copy-edits for clarity.[1]
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 
The article is adequately referenced to reliable sources. I assume good faith for all off-line sources.
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 
Thorough, but not over detailed.
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 

It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 
Two images used, bot correctly tagged and captioned.
Overall:
Pass/Fail: 
If you can just fix the exhumation bit above, I will be happy to pass this as a good article. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 20:23, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
Good, all is in order, I am happy to list this as a good article. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 21:25, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

Yeah, that should have read "funeral director", not funeral. I've fixed it. Thanks for the review! — Hunter Kahn 20:55, 13 April 2010 (UTC)