# Talk:IND Culver Line

A recent anonymous editor modified the leading sentence to read:

The IND Culver Line is an antiquated name of the rapid transit line of the IND Division of the New York City Subway....
I reverted the change and am responding here in case that editor returns to have another look. The NYCS|WikiProject New York City Subway has adopted the convention of prepending IRT, BMT, or IND to each line, and this convention is used on hundreds of pages. Putting "antiquated" without further explanation on just one of these pages is clearly not going to help the reader. Marc Shepherd 12:43, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

Stations when it was a steam line included the following:

Greenwood (9th Avenue and 20th Street)
Turner's near Fort Hamilton Parkway
Kensington at Avenue C
Ditmas Avenue or Kensington Junction?
18th Avenue
Parkville at the Bay Ridge Branch
Cemetery, Washington Cemetery, Washington, or 22nd Avenue (Bay Parkway)
Woodlawn, Harris, or Avenue N
Avenue P
King's Highway or Kings Highway
Brooklyn Jockey Club, Jockey Club Race Course, or Race Track between Avenue S and Avenue T
Gravesend at Gravesend Neck Road
Avenue W
Van Sicklen, Van Sicklen's, or Van Sicklens at Coney Island Plank Road (north of Neptune Avenue)
Coney Island, West Brighton Beach, or West Brighton terminal at Surf Avenue west of West 5th Street
Branch from 5th Avenue and 36th Street
39th Street Ferry
8th Avenue
9th Avenue
West Brooklyn-Fort Hamilton Avenue or Fort Hamilton Avenue
13th Avenue
15th Avenue
This map confirms a few of the stations, and something else, which I'm going to bring up on the main NYPT talk page. ----DanTD (talk) 21:45, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
A map from TrainWeb's South Brooklyn Railway page gives some concrete evidence of Ditmas Avenue being Kensington Junction. Now We just need a good reason to believe that West Brooklyn-Fort Hamilton Avenue (Culver Line) was replaced by Fort Hamilton Parkway (BMT Culver Line). ---------User:DanTD (talk)  14:18, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:IND Culver Line/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Coemgenus (talk · contribs) 13:30, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
I'll review this one over the next few days. --Coemgenus (talk) 13:30, 10 May 2017 (UTC) 

Thank you for taking this review up.--Kew Gardens 613 (talk) 17:19, 10 May 2017 (UTC)


### Checklist
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, spelling, and grammar):  b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): 

It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):  d (copyvio and plagiarism): 

It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 

It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 

It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 

Overall:
Pass/Fail: 


### Comments
Images
There are almost too many, but I think it works. Any more and you'd crowd out the text. The one I'd move is File:Bmt_triplex_no_5.png, which brackets the text in conjunction with File:Culverstub.JPG in that section. Stacking them would solve the problem.
Everything about licensing seems to be in order.
Extent and service
"However, there has been no express service on the Culver Line since 1987. Express service has only operated once on the line from 1968 to 1987." These sentences say much the same thing, and could probably be combined and shortened.
Automated equipment
I would spell out "Communications-based train control" the first time it's mentioned.
IND Brooklyn Line (1933–1954)
I made some minor copyedits, please revert if I've changed the meaning of sentences improperly.
Everything else looks good so far. I'll do a second pass while you work on these. --Coemgenus (talk) 18:40, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
I have dealt with all of these.--Kew Gardens 613 (talk) 18:53, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
I think that's everything. Nice article! I'll promote it right away. --Coemgenus (talk) 12:01, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
Thank you so much! --Kew Gardens 613 (talk) 00:46, 14 May 2017 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on IND Culver Line. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061001154606/http://www.comptroller.nyc.gov/bureaus/eng/complete.pdf to http://www.comptroller.nyc.gov/bureaus/eng/complete.pdf
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051203013610/http://www.subwaywebnews.com/Photo%20Archive/Jaystation.jpg to http://www.subwaywebnews.com/Photo%20Archive/Jaystation.jpg
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151001235235/http://www.gowanusyourfaceoff.com/2014/09/22/f-train-express-service-might-be-coming-back-to-brooklyn/ to http://www.gowanusyourfaceoff.com/2014/09/22/f-train-express-service-might-be-coming-back-to-brooklyn/
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160520120823/http://gothamist.com/2016/05/17/f_train_express_returns.php to http://gothamist.com/2016/05/17/f_train_express_returns.php
Corrected formatting/usage for http://web.mta.info/nyct/service/culver2016/index.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:07, 3 November 2017 (UTC)