# Talk:Nepotism (The Office)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Nepotism (The Office)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Ruby2010 talk 23:59, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
I will review sometime today or tomorrow. Ruby2010 talk 23:59, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose):  b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): 

It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 

It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 

It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 

It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 

Overall:
Pass/Fail: 


### Comments
Please add links to the characters' articles in the lead
Add how many viewers the episode had to the lead
In the end the backfired prank does impress Jim.[2] Why is this cited? Is it a controversial comment? (I like The Office, but haven't seen this particular episode yet).
Add how Daniel Chun and Jeffrey Blitz relate to the show (are they producers, writers etc?)
Kevin Fitzpatrick of UGO Networks was a good episode, but not an especially important one which failed to advance any ongoing story lines. Word missing.
Reference 19 needs production fix ("Tvbythenumbers" should be consistent among all refs).
The article was a pleasure to read, and I truly didn't find much wrong with it. Just edit accordingly to my suggestions above, respond back on this page, and the article will be good to go. Thanks, Ruby2010 talk 01:00, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
Oh, and I'm placing the article on hold for seven days (though I'm sure it will be fixed much sooner). Thanks, Ruby2010 talk 01:01, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
All points addressed; thanks for the review. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 02:50, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
Looks good to go. Passed for GA. Good work, Ruby2010 talk 05:09, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Nepotism (The Office). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100926222240/http://www.nbc.com/The_Office/video/nepotism-clip-one/1251014 to http://www.nbc.com/The_Office/video/nepotism-clip-one/1251014/
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100926205300/http://www.nbc.com/The_Office/video/nepotism-clip-two/1251076/ to http://www.nbc.com/The_Office/video/nepotism-clip-two/1251076/
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100929090011/http://www.nbc.com/The_Office/video/nepotism-clip-three/1251294/ to http://www.nbc.com/The_Office/video/nepotism-clip-three/1251294/
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100926093824/http://www.ugo.com/tv/the-office-nepotism-recap to http://www.ugo.com/tv/the-office-nepotism-recap
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:03, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Nepotism (The Office). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101202095953/http://cornellsun.com/node/43616 to http://www.cornellsun.com/node/43616
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100926103740/http://tvbythenumbers.com/2010/09/24/thursday-finals-big-bang-theory-my-dad-says-the-office-the-mentalist-and-outsourced-all-rise/65100 to http://tvbythenumbers.com/2010/09/24/thursday-finals-big-bang-theory-my-dad-says-the-office-the-mentalist-and-outsourced-all-rise/65100
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111205135004/http://www.nbc.com/the-office/episode-guide/season-7/42801/nepotism/episode-701/42802 to http://www.nbc.com/the-office/episode-guide/season-7/42801/nepotism/episode-701/42802/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:21, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Nepotism (The Office). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100926030051/http://blog.zap2it.com/frominsidethebox/2010/09/the-office-premiere-the-good-the-bad-and-the-wuphf.html to http://blog.zap2it.com/frominsidethebox/2010/09/the-office-premiere-the-good-the-bad-and-the-wuphf.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:33, 16 February 2018 (UTC)