# Talk:Burning at Both Ends

Reviews:
Review section clearly biased in favour of positive scores. Case in point: the AbsolutePunk review links to a review by a registered user, even though a staff-member of the site crafted a much harsher review of the album.
64.118.23.169 (talk) 03:17, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
^Incorrect. The user is an official AbsolutePunk reviews contributor.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.109.51.177 (talk) 05:00, 22 September 2012 (UTC) 

This review is transcluded from Talk:Burning at Both Ends/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: MarioSoulTruthFan (talk · contribs) 21:01, 21 April 2020 (UTC)


### Infobox
Needs alt


### Lead
of the month due to bad weather → of the month due to bad weather to finish the album
Add the Dead Press! year end list addition


### Background and recording
McTernan, who also acted as the engineer, was assisted Paul Leavitt → missing "by" and the latter worked as an enginner or in production?
Tracking → Recording
following on January 8. → followed on January 8
assisted by Kyle Black → same issue as before
Try to have the sources at the end of the sentences it breaks the reading
tracking → recording


### Composition
with the exception of "Calaveras", which is credited to the band. → on the track list says it is to Mikey Ambrose the writting
Like a Virgin Saved by the Bell and The Goonies → years of release
"Calaveras" is written by drummer Mikey Ambrose → add it to the first point I make and remove it from the last setence


### Release
The sources that are mid-sentece try to move them to the end of a sentence
before being released on June 28 through Epitaph Records → source?
bonus track[26] → move the source to the end of the sentence
Between June and August, → Between June and August of 2011,


### Reception
number 27 on Independent Albums,[50] → move the source to the end of the sentece
AllMusic → second paragraph
Rock Sound → first paragraph
Dead Press! → should be in the first paragraph but the review is quite negative, despite the eight starts, you can choose other instance of the review that is more positive and them move it.


### Track listing
Fine


### Personnel
Fine


### Charts
Fine


### References
AllMusic source is dead
Noisecreep → publisher
WP:ALBUMAVOID "An artist's social networking site, such as Facebook or Twitter, in addition to personal blogs and forum posts, should largely be avoided. If the information being added from one of these websites is truly notable enough for inclusion, a publication will likely report about".
It's acceptable per WP:SOCIALMEDIA. Yeepsi (talk) 20:46, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
@Yeepsi: Archive them, as they can go dead at any given time. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 00:27, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
Done. Yeepsi (talk) 07:32, 23 April 2020 (UTC)


### Overall
Don't address any comment until I say so.
Done. Yeepsi (talk) 21:07, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
It's a pass. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 11:57, 23 April 2020 (UTC)