# Talk:Cow Tower, Norwich

See http://www.english-heritage.org.uk/  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.28.128.192 (talk) 06:12, 10 November 2011 (UTC) 

I've gone through and given the article a thorough expansion; everything should be well cited now, but a copyedit would be useful. Hchc2009 (talk) 18:00, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Cow Tower, Norwich/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Zawed (talk · contribs) 00:14, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
I have reviewed this article. I made a couple minor edits to correct what I thought were clear typos and only have a few minor comments to make:
Headings 

Pedantic I know, but are the right dashes being used in the headings?
Fixed. Hchc2009 (talk) 10:11, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
Lead

Should "artillery tower" be wikilinked (perhaps a potential article if it does not exist already)?
Should "parapets" be wikilinked?
Both are now wikilinked (I've found a temporary spot for artillery tower to link to).Hchc2009 (talk) 10:11, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
14th century

"...and then the "tower in the Hospital meadows"...": should "tower in the Hospital meadows" be in title case?
It's not in title case in any of the originals, so I'd gone for a direct quote and keeping in regular case. Hchc2009 (talk) 10:11, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
15th - 16th centuries

"...with the Crown occasionally issuing instructions given it should be repaired.": Is there something missing here, or should "given" be deleted?
Fixed. Hchc2009 (talk) 10:11, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
Architecture

"The river bends around about 1 metre (3 ft 3 in) from the base of the tower, and its base may...": close repetition of base.
Fixed. Hchc2009 (talk) 10:11, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
Other stuff

References look OK as does their formatting.
Duplicate link: Southampton.
No dab links
Checklink tool does not identify any issues.
Image tags look OK.
Link deduped. Hchc2009 (talk) 10:11, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
Overall, I found this an interesting and well written article with only the few minor nitpicks mentioned above. I'll check back for your response in a couple of days. Cheers. Zawed (talk) 00:14, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

Should all be done, and thanks for the review! Hchc2009 (talk) 10:11, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
All good, passing as GA. Zawed (talk) 11:05, 1 January 2014 (UTC)