# Talk:French cruiser Châteaurenault (1898)

This review is transcluded from Talk:French cruiser Châteaurenault (1898)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Hog Farm (talk · contribs) 03:21, 18 July 2020 (UTC)


### Criteria
1. Prose  On hold
2. Verifiability  On hold
3. Depth of Coverage  Pass
4. Neutral  Pass
5. Stable  Pass
6. Illustrations  Pass
7. Miscellaneous  On hold


### Comments
1. 

Length is given as 140 m in the infobox, and as 135 m in the prose
Fixed
Beam is given as 17 m in the prose and as 18 m in the infobox
Fixed
Draft is given as 7.39 m in the prose and 7.5 in the infobox
Fixed
Displacement is 7898 in the prose and 8200 in the infobox
Fixed
Complement is 604 in the prose and 625 in the infobox
Fixed
Isn't it standard to have the range in the infobox?
Yup, good catch
" cast iron, AP, and SAP projectiles" - I can tell what AP and SAP stand for, but the acronyms should be introduced instead of just brought it
Huh, I could've sworn I did that when I wrote that section - must have gotten distracted
Isn't armor plating typically in the infobox for these ships, too?
Yes indeed - added
Prose says keel laying in May 1896, infobox says 12 October 1895*
Fixed
2.

The exact commissioning date of 10 October 1902 is not cited, only the month and year are.
Fixed
Namesake is not cited
Removed
Shouldn't Garbett go before Gardiner in the ordering of the references?
Yep
The succeeded by class needs cited
I don't think there's an expectation that nav templates need sources
3. 
4.
5.
6.
7.

The short description of "ship" is a bit lacking, something like "French protected cruiser" would be better.
Added that
The infobox needs quite a bit of work. Hog Farm  Bacon 04:20, 19 July 2020 (UTC)

Yeah, I forgot to overhaul the box when I finished writing the article. Parsecboy (talk) 00:57, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
Passing. Hog Farm  Bacon 02:30, 20 July 2020 (UTC)