# Talk:Intrepid Museum

I can say for a fact that the reference to the Intrepid being home to a Marine Corps recruiting station is no longer valid as the station has moved to military island in Times Square between 9th and Broadway Aves, so I took it out. I'm an active-duty corporal working for the Marine Corps Public Affairs Office in New York, if you really even need credentials for this kind of obvious thing. - Id versus— Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.134.252.34 (talk) 14:29 &:30, 3 August 2007‎

hi i dunno anything about editing but it says "interpid" on one of the paragraphs and that seemed like it was begging to be edited.and the comment about the 2nd attempt is just kinda throw in therepeace -max— Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.108.158.15 (talk) 18:53, 14 January 2007‎

Got it. Thanks or catching that for us. - BillCJ 19:16, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

The museum's Web site calls it "the Intrepid Sea, Air & Space Museum," not "(the) Intrepid Sea-Air-Space Museum." (I suppose it was called the latter at one time.) --anon. 162.83.145.75 (talk) 18:06, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

Right. The literature that they give you when you go in has no hyphenation either. - Gus (T, C) 2011-07-30 02:07Z  — Preceding undated comment added   02:07, 30 July 2011
Gus, please take no offense at my insisting on appending our institutional format for Zulu time: The version the {{undated}} template provides will prevent some WP-inspecting software from treating your contrib as if the information were just missing!--Jerzy•t 09:33, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

If I'm not mistaken, at one time other ships were part of the museum, including a light ship, destroyer and a retired Coast Guard cutter. Perhaps they can be mentioned somewhere? Daysleeper47 (talk) 15:44, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
   In the same vein: I had the impression there was an SR-71 there rather than A-12. Is that a change? Or might the guides (justifiably?) fuzz up the distinction between two birds of a feather? --Jerzy•t 09:33, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Intrepid Sea, Air & Space Museum. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081020031048/http://www.chinfo.navy.mil/navpalib/ships/carriers/histories/cv11-intrepid/cv11-intrepid.html to http://www.chinfo.navy.mil/navpalib/ships/carriers/histories/cv11-intrepid/cv11-intrepid.html
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110415163648/http://www.intrepidmuseum.org/shuttle/ to http://www.intrepidmuseum.org/shuttle/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:03, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Intrepid Sea, Air & Space Museum. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141220101058/http://tps.cr.nps.gov/nhl/detail.cfm?ResourceId=2092&ResourceType=Structure to http://tps.cr.nps.gov/nhl/detail.cfm?ResourceId=2092&ResourceType=Structure
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.bradenton.com/2012/07/18/4119228/space-shuttle-enterprise-set-to.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:40, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

@Schwede66, I noticed you temporarily move-protected the page last week, citing WP:MPNOREDIRECT. The move protection expired after three days, but the article has not run on the main page yet.
To throw something else into the mix, it seems like the museum has just rebranded itself as the "Intrepid Museum". Should the temporary move protection be reinstated? The only source for the rename is a PR Newswire press release as of now, but I think people will still try to move the page to its new name while the article is on the Main Page. – Epicgenius (talk) 19:07, 5 October 2023 (UTC)

Epicgenius, I move-protected the article for such a short period of time as during that time, I would have appeared on the main page according to the DYK queue at that time. But then it got pulled (well, I pulled it) and forgot about the move protection, which I should have removed at that point. It's since been promoted back to the queue and is currently scheduled to run on 11 October (UTC). That's five days away and there's no trouble to move this article around before it hits the main page. I'll write myself a reminder to reinstate move protection prior to it hitting the main page. Schwede66 23:20, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for the response, that makes sense. – Epicgenius (talk) 00:38, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
Is t 96.45.233.147 (talk) 00:27, 15 March 2024 (UTC)