# Talk:John MacBride (Royal Navy officer)

...to my edit summary, I'll add that the milhist text is not even clear about whether it wants pictures to be 300px or just using "300px" as a sample of how you should write it - note that it's in a context teaching users what the proper script is. It could be just as example of size, not the size. Dahn (talk) 19:55, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:John MacBride (Royal Navy officer)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Harrison49 (talk) 18:55, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality: 

B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists: 
The article maintains a good layout and style throughout.
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources: 

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary: 

C. No original research: 
The article is well referenced.
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects: 

B. Focused: 
The article covers the major aspects and remains focused.
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias: 
The article maintains a neutral point of view.
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc: 
The article does not appear to be subject to edit warring.
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales: 

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions: 
Images are used effectively.
Overall:
Pass or Fail: 
A very interesting and informative article. Harrison49 (talk) 20:40, 27 April 2011 (UTC)