# Talk:Inverted-F antenna

This review is transcluded from Talk:Inverted-F antenna/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Samtar (talk · contribs) 17:46, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

Well thanks for reviewing Samtar! SpinningSpark 18:49, 10 November 2015 (UTC)


### Criteria
### Review
Well-written:

Verifiable with no original research:

Broad in its coverage:

Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.

Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.

Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:


#### Result
#### Discussion
Well done SpinningSpark - this article flew through the GA criteria! Keep up the good work, and never stop striving to improve  samtar  {t} 09:59, 11 November 2015 (UTC)


### Additional notes
For inanimate objects: one antenna, two antennas.
For animate objects ("bugs", insects, sea creatures and the like): one antenna, two antennae.12.90.238.18 (talk) 19:00, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

It is not incorrect.  The Latinate plural has been used right from the time radio was invented, and is still used in scholarly papers now.  Either plural is acceptable, see User:Spinningspark/Plural of antenna. SpinningSpark 19:35, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

While inserting minor formatting changes and minor citation corrections, I noticed that the article was full of post-period typewriter double-spaces. That now-obsolete habit is not used with proportionally spaced fonts: It was only used for old fixed-space (typewriter) fonts in the early days of ASCII text.
So I removed all of the double-spaces after periods I could find. Please do not try to restore them: Wikipedia is rendered in proportionally spaced fonts and it is now a typing error.
107.116.93.41 (talk) 10:53, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

Readers can render Wikipedia pages in any font they want.  You have no idea what they are doing.  This style is not an error, either in recognised style manuals (see User:Spinningspark/Two spaces at the end of sentences) or in the Wikipedia MOS (see MOS:DOUBLE SPACE).  Styles already established in an article take precedence per MOS:STYLEVAR unless there is a good reason to change them.  And in this case there is no good reason since, as you say, they are not rendered in proportional fonts and hence make no visible difference. SpinningSpark 11:26, 16 January 2022 (UTC)