# Talk:John Crakehall

Template:Did you know nominations/John Crakehall

Inserting new material into an already cited section is implying that the new material is supported by the citation. Unfortunately, the recent edits are NOT covered by the sources. And some edits have removed the supporting citations from material that was cited. This article was fully cited before and now it’s no longer complying with our sourcing policies. Pleas learn how to add information before doing further edits. Ealdgyth - Talk 11:37, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

the relevant policy and guideline is at WP:INTEGRITY. Ealdgyth - Talk 11:50, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

here -- Ealdgyth (talk) 21:34, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:John Crakehall/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Hog Farm (talk · contribs) 13:19, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

"If John was Elias' son" - I'm sure this is a variant spelling of Ellis, but it's probably best to stick with one spelling
Nope, just me typoing. Ealdgyth (talk) 16:34, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
So they commemorated his death before he actually died?
I tried to clarify. No, I don't know why they did the commemoration on the 5th, when he died between 8-10 September. Ealdgyth (talk) 16:34, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
"treasuerer" - is this a spelling error or a technical term?
I can spell, really! Ealdgyth (talk) 16:34, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
"and eventually to civil war in 1264" - Piped link Second Barons' War here?
Linked, but not piped. Ealdgyth (talk) 16:34, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Is the "edi" at the end of the long citation for Jobson 2010 intentional and signifying something or an accidental inclusion?
Typo, removed. Ealdgyth (talk) 16:34, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
That's all from me. Hog Farm  Talk 15:42, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

I think I got all these? Ealdgyth (talk) 16:34, 10 May 2022 (UTC)