# Talk:Northwest Passage (Fringe)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Northwest Passage (Fringe)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Starstriker7(Talk) 04:15, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
I will review this one. --Starstriker7(Talk) 04:15, 29 May 2011 (UTC)

If you'd like to find the specific locations, you can use the find aspect of your browser. This can usually be accessed using Control+F or Apple+F.


### Prose issues (Criterion 1a [clear prose])
#### Lead
continuing to stay away --> as he continues to stay away?
Fixed


#### Plot
How does Peter go from being a suspect to being one who aids in the investigation? This should be clarified.
"but he gets away --> but he escapes.
"took place; a dairy farm" --> Is that the correct use of a semicolon?
"Meanwhile back in Boston" --> "Meanwhile, back"
All fixed


### Manual of style issues (Criterion 1b [Lead, Layout, Words to Watch, Fiction, List Incorporation])
#### Lead
The lead doesn't mention anything about the Cultural references section. A mention should be made to encompass all sections of the article.
The lead already mentioned Twin Peaks, but I reworded it to say the episode has references to the series, not similarities


#### Layout
In the edit window, there is an extra white space between the Cultural references and Reception sections. This should be cut to one white space.
Didn't see the extra space on my edit window


#### Fiction
The plot should be rewritten completely in present tense.
"is kidnapped and murdered."
"Peter was involved"
"where the murders took place"
"They find the owner, who confesses to killing the women because they rejected him, and kidnapped and tortured Mathis's partner when he discovered the culprit"
"is approached by Newton"
"The man is revealed"
"After they ask why he didn't come"
I attempted to make a few tense changes, but I think the plot is all present tense already


### Information and source issues (Criterion 2a [All information is cited; sections in proper position])
1 is from a blog, but the blog appears to be written by a trusted author. I believe that this is excusable.
3 is also from a blog. I am not sure if this is reliable. Try to replace this one.
http://watching-tv.ew.com/2010/05/07/fringe-season-2-episode-21/ 11] also feels like a blog. Ken Tucker seems reliable enough, but it still doesn't sit very well with me.
All three sources are very common and reliable, and I use them all the time with no trouble. To persuade you, I recently had an in-depth FAC and not one editor questioned those three sources' reliability. Also, all three websites are written by paid columnists, not just a random guy with a blog.


### Contentious material and citation issues (Criterion 2b [Controversial/Contentious material cited; inline citations used])
The formatting for ref 6 (Jackson, Joshua, Martha Plimpton) is unequal. I'm fairly certain that it should be formatted either like "Joshua Jackson; Martha Plimpton" or "Jackson, Joshua; Plimpton, Martha."
Fixed to Jackson, Joshua; Plimpton, Martha


### Original research issues (Criterion 2c [No original research])
None to report.


### Broadness issues (Criterion 3a [All main concepts addressed])
For such a popular episode, I'm surprised it didn't garner any awards. Are you certain that none were won (or nominated)?
I have not seen any, but I'll do another google search for someAfter a google search, I failed to find any awards or nominations for the episode, unfortunately. I think it definitely deserved some though :/ Just another case of the series being criminally ignored by award-givers


### Focus issues (Criterion 3b [Stays focused; need not the unnecessary detail])
It seems alright in this aspect.


### Neutrality issues (Criterion 4 [No undue weight to certain viewpoints])
No problems here.


### Stability issues (Criterion 5 [No edit warring, etc.])
All quiet on the Western front.


### Image copyright issues (Criterion 6a [Images properly tagged, licensed, etc. if content is free-use])
There is one fair-use image, and it is properly tagged and licensed.


### Image relevance issues (Criterion 6b [Images relevant and with good captions])
The Plimpton image seems a little on the tangential side, but I'll run with it anyways.


### Overall comments
Nice work fixing up this article as such, Ruby. I'm going to put this on hold for now after the comments I've placed are resolved. --Starstriker7(Talk) 06:00, 29 May 2011 (UTC)

Thank you very much for the review! It is much appreciated (especially with the awful backlog GA has now). Thanks again, Ruby2010 comment! 15:31, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
Of course! I think you've addressed all my comments to my satisfaction. I'll hunt for the extra space in a sec, but this article looks ready to pass. Again, good work on this one! --Starstriker7(Talk) 19:37, 29 May 2011 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Northwest Passage (Fringe). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100509150855/http://tvbythenumbers.com/2010/05/07/thursday-finals-survivor-bones-adjusted-up-30-rock-adjusted-down/50840 to http://tvbythenumbers.com/2010/05/07/thursday-finals-survivor-bones-adjusted-up-30-rock-adjusted-down/50840
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:34, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Northwest Passage (Fringe). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110624052452/http://www.televisionwithoutpity.com/show/year_in_review/year_in_review_2010_most_memor.php to http://www.televisionwithoutpity.com/show/year_in_review/year_in_review_2010_most_memor.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:35, 18 June 2017 (UTC)