# Talk:Katie Melua

Is the picture legally here? What about the copyright? If I recall correctly, it is one of the official publicity photos! --NicApicella 06/Jul/2005
According to Wikipedia:Publicity photos it is Fair Use as long as it has come from a press kit or similar, with the express purpose of being used for freely available publicity.  This is what is claimed on the page for the picture. JP Godfrey 15:55, 9 November 2005 (UTC)

Her name is Mingrelian. Has she ever claimed to be Mingrelian? pavel76 12/08/05
Katie is a Mingrelian(Megrelian) singer.Her family were born Lazistan-Megrelia.She is a Megrel isn't Georgian (moved from article page)
Megrels (Megrelians) are Georgians. Oldest representatives of Georgians, who speak their own dialect of Georgian language. Megrels, Imeretinans, Svans, Ajarians, Kahkhetinas, Gurinas are all Kartvels (Georgians).

Mingrelian is not an ethnicity. It is a group of people that thousands of years ago comprised the western half of modern-day Georgia, Colchis. They,along with other regional groups, are one of the forming blocks of the unified Georgian ethnic group that emerged after the kingdoms of the east and west were united under Christianity in the middle of the first millennium of our era. --ComtesseDeMingrélie  20:16, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

I have noticed the changing of her name from Ketevan Natasha "Katie" Melua to Ketevan "Katie" Melua and back again. I know her real first name is Ketevan, but what about her middle name? Is it sourced? 11:21, 30 October 2005.

Being originally from Georgia, she is unlikely to have a middle name. The presence of 'Natasha' in her full name was thus unnecessary. It is also rather doubtful that it was/is her nickname, although this is certainly possible.
Unless there is any strong proof that her middle name is Natasha, like Melua saying it is in an interview, I don't think it should be put here. Hera1187 07:20, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
In keeping with the naming conventions of her native country, Katie Melua does not have a middle name. The 'Natasha' rumour is untrue. This was confirmed in a post by her uncle, Zurab Melua, on the unofficial fan site, Melualand.com - Mark Bishop

I have heard it mentioned from a couple of sources (based on direct interviews with Melua) that she was born in Kutaisi, Georgia. Any information on this claim?

According to this interview [1] she was born in Kutaisi. 12:34 5 November 2005

Is she agnostic? Is it sourced? I thought she went to catholic schools. Hera1187 09:33, 28 May 2006 (UTC)

From reading her page on wikiquotes she seems to suggest she is agnostic. See wikiquote:Katie Melua. 11:01, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
Just because your parents send you to a faith school it doesn't mean you subscribe to that religion or even believe in God. Plus there's a saying in Britain: "If you want your child to grow up to be an atheist, send them to convent school." Most kids don't get to choose where and how they are educated. 86.17.247.135 00:37, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

Perhaps someone expert in the subject of vocal ranges could add an extra paragraph about the vocal range of Katie Melua?

The article says she's british, although she's born in Georgia; does she have a double citizenship? Or it says so just because she lives in the UK? --Εξαίρετος (msg) 16:17, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

Err... I just read it in the article :-[ --Εξαίρετος (msg) 16:19, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

I strongly reject the clam that I am homophobic or snobbish as User:TerriNunn suggested here. Forgive me for thinking the phrase "News of the World exclusive: Melua's secret lesbian lover" is a bit suspect. I think it should be reverted, not because I'm homophobic, because the newspaper article is clearly a tabloid talking a load of rubbish and it has no place on Wikipedia. Philip Stevens 15:11, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

it is significant as an event in her biography - a story in the most widely read Sunday newspaper - even if the NOTW cannot back it up. On that basis alone it merits inclusion. Why do people object to stories about same-sex relationships but not boyfriend-girlfriend stories unless homophobia is being pandered to somewhere? NOTW gets sued - but they break a lot of true stories and the libel laws are a joke (Archer/Liberace/Robert Maxwell/ etc.etc). The addition to the KM article simply reports the report - it doesn't take a stand on it or introduce POV. TerriNunn 17:31, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
I think that the only real issue here is is wether or not we should include the information due to the fact that it was reported by such a shady source. I feel that we need a more reliable source to say this before we should include this (possible) fact. I feel that this would have to be confirmed by at least two independent sources since this topic is so contraversial in today's society. See Independent_sources for some more details on independent sources. Facts are facts and opinion should not be regarded in a matter like this, meaning that I feel that a fact like this is not all that important to make it into someone's bio but if it could be proved as a fact (using reliable sources) would have to include it if someone felt the need for its inclusion. About as much as I can say is that this bad press defenatly proves that she is worthy of being in Wikipedia. Andrew D White 21:50, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
I would agree with this opinion - it's not whether it's homophobic but whether it fails WP:RS. I recall seeing an article in such a publication suggesting a certain high profile UK sports star had adopted Islam so he could have four wives. The entire article was crock and based on the sayso of "friends" of the star, who may well not have known him for months or years and may have been paid generously for their comments. Orderinchaos78 14:40, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
people never recall NOTW stories that are wrong - they just think so. It breaks more stories than the Washington Post. I agree with TerriNunn. The story is everywhere in discussions. At lest here it is dealt with in a straightforward way - and the fact that no further evidence has come to light is pointed out. Take it away and people will think there is more to it than, to date, there is. She is a friend of Lara.  (Andrew D White cannot spell.)62.64.208.62 13:18, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
So it should be obvious by your last comment on my opinion. Content is more important than its presentation. I am just pointing out that
we need to be sure about its factual accuracy. Andrew D White 01:52, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
Difficult one- if it is cited only as a newspaper report then may amount to speculation. She is also quoted as neither confirming or denying it, only saying no comment- not sure if this makes any difference? Rob 00:20, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
Even if she is currently in a lesbian relationship, she has had hererosexual relationships prior to this even going as far as considering marriage. So I think she should be described as bisexual. 77.99.233.169 (talk) 16:58, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

The problem is the article needs to be better written overall.  It has some good points, number one of which is that the editors actually bothered to extensively research the singer.  Please don't undervalue this--as it is appears to be something that is not frequently done or not well done (as in the number and variety of sources) with young popular singer's articles on Wikipedia.  The article is also, overall, a rather general article about the singer that could be useful for people who aren't fans to consult.  A lot of articles about young current singers tend to read like fanzines and just turn the general audience off.  These are two very strong points, imo about the article, research has been done, and it is written for a general audience, not just her fans.  It made me curious about Katie Melua's music--what it should do, ultimately, and imo, as a FA on Wikipedia's front page.  I love to find an article there about something or someone I've never heard of that makes me read to the end.  This article has the potential to do that.  It is however, rather poorly written, and sparse in some areas.  Too much so on the former, for it to be a FA right now, or a FAC, imo.  The prose is simply not compelling.
"It was whilst at the school that Melua was spotted by producer Mike Batt.
As a result of being spotted at a young age, Melua didn't attend University though she has often stated her desire to do so, citing English literature, history and physics as her courses of choice should she ever get the chance to go.[17][18]"
Spotted?  Is she a musician or a model?  He "spotted" her and this caused her to not attend university?  Didn't her choice of careers have anything to do with it.  
Weekly World News, by the way, is a tabloid, and it should be stated within the article when relaying information from tabloids, that the source is a tabloid, especially when dealing with a biography of a living person.
Anyway, lots of problems with the prose, too many, imo, for this to be a FAC.  Although I hope you work towards making it one, especially as an example for other articles about popular singers, because of the effort towards research and a generalist article.  Maybe there is another article in this area that has compelling prose that you can look at? KP Botany 16:12, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

This quote does come from a link, but is not true: "The ceremony was important to Melua because if her had father lost his job before becoming a citizen, the family would have been forced to return to Georgia."  
It might have been true in the early years of their time in Britain, but once permanent residence (Indefinite Leave to Remain) had been obtained, there would have been no question of having to return.  Under the rules at the time this would likely have been given after 4 years.  ILR is a pre-requisite for naturalisation as British.
I will delete this in a few days if there are no objections.   JAJ 00:11, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

According to Melua, she would have been sent back if her father had lost his job. See here and here. Perhaps she is mistaken, but I still think it should be mentioned. Maybe should add that caveat to it though. Hera1187 07:18, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
Yes, just say that is what she though, although point out, and source, that it is not currently true, although once was.   KP Botany 17:09, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

I feel that minimually all referenced web site references should have the date the data was retreived and one should possibly even use the Template:Cite_web to site these sources. Additionally in my opinion, the sourcing in general could look a little neater, please use some offically reconized format for sourcing. I feel that no article should make GA without following one of the major formating schemes for its sources. See Wikipedia:Citing_sources for details. Until these issues are resolved I must fail it on style. I would also like to see more printed sources as references. Just fix these issues and I will have no problem with it reaching GA. Andrew D White 22:22, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose):  b (MoS): 
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
a (fair representation):  b (all significant views): 
It is stable.

It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
a (tagged and captioned):  b lack of images (does not in itself exclude GA):  c (non-free images have fair use rationales): 
Overall:
a Pass/Fail: 
Above is the more graphical representation of how I rate the article. Note that I do not feel completely qualified to rate 6 but I feel that it is acceptable as long as no one else sees any major problems. They are all tagged as fair usage (possible FA elimination). See my above notes for my problems with style involving references.
Andrew D White 22:42, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

Put all refs into {{{{:cite web}}}} as requested. Hera1187 09:48, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

It was more than 7 days since this nomination was on hold; therefore, I decided to be bold and fail this article on the basis that images in this article are without fair use rationale.--Crzycheetah 05:19, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

I can't see a problem, so I've put it in for a Good Article Review. Philip Stevens 12:04, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
As I already mentioned, the previous nomination  was on hold for more than 7 days which should not have happened. After I failed this nomination, the editor made the necessary changes. Renominate it, I am sure it will pass the GA criteria now because I can't see a problem, either. --Crzycheetah 18:37, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
Why would the editor only make the changes after it failed the nomination? Philip Stevens 18:41, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
To make it a good article later on, I guess... --Crzycheetah 20:23, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
Because they were good suggestions.  It isn't the end of the world if the article fails GA; the article still continues on.  GA is just a formal process that says "it's at this standard." Hbdragon88 04:06, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
At WP:GA/R there is a 5-0 vote to relist this, so did so. Rlevse 15:36, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

I tried to add in her instruments played (guitar, piano and vocals) but the infobox just didn't show it even though I put it in the infobox, Help! User:Speedboy Salesman My talk page 18:29, November 23, 2025 (UTC).

I have added the instruments played.Hera1187 06:42, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
Why did it not work for me?User:Speedboy Salesman My talk page 18:29, November 23, 2025 (UTC).
The fields are case sensitive, maybe that was the problem. Hera1187 12:52, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

So, she's British because... she was born in Georgia, moved to Ireland and, at the age of 14, she moved to Britain? Just clarifying here.... 89.100.195.42 17:10, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

She's a British citizen, look here. --Hera1187 17:20, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
Note that Northern Ireland is part of the UK, and that it's semi-traditional around WP to have the semi-Easter-egg link [[United Kingdom|British]], in much the same way one gets [[United States|American]].  (British and American are both ambiguous in their scope, as those pages make fairly clear.)  Alai 05:37, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

She considers herself as British-Georgian. See source 24. --Thus Spake Anittas 14:48, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

See discussion (10 above). It is absurd to say it is not sourced. 62.64.208.62 13:13, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

It's absurd to say it IS sourced. It's only method of citing is "a source says" which is only slightly less preposterous than me writing my own article declaring her a Nazi; "a source says: it's true, she really is a Nazi." and trying to get that in. SteveLamacq43 13:27, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
You have no grounds to remove it. By your thinking everything that you don't like isn't a source. You have no basis on which to decide. What you are really pushing is the idea that having a relationship with someone of the same sex is a smear. It is not an extraordinary claim that KM has a relationship with someone. You are trying to censor what you don't like and that is vandalism and homophobia. 62.64.223.155 14:46, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
It is not.
Is there a better source that "a friend" said, nudge,nudge" story in the news of the screws? --Fredrick day 20:21, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
Basically there is some unfounded gossip about someone's sexuality. Go to a hair salon for that, leave wikipedia for verified facts please. Nina 61.95.116.45 12:10, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

It isn't made clear in this article, but this artist has done quite well on Billboard's jazz chart. While it is true that none of her albums have made the top 100 on the pop charts, she has spent months on the jazz charts (alongside other contemporary jazz artists, including Diana Krall and Madeleine Peyroux). She just hasn't crossed over to the pop field, like Norah Jones and Michael Buble have. This article seems to indicate that she is practically unknown in the US, but that certainly isn't true in the case of American jazz fans.
Jrs1010 16:49, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

I just changed the release date of her next album to 1 October 2007 and removed the "citation needed" tag. I got the information from [2], which is her official site, but can't link directly to the statement because of the method of navigating the site. To find the announcement, just click on 'news' at the top. Maybe someone with a bit more knowledge could put in the necessary reference? - Jetekus 01:52, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

i'm the one who's deleting the chapter "criticism", totally irrelevant, for the following reasons (and users like hera1187 should read and understand, instead of unwise undos): 
1) when you read the sources (obviously hera never did), there is NO criticism about the fact melua is not writing all of her stuff... so, to mention these blog-quality-articles is not relevant at all: they just say, melua does not write everything, ok and so what?
2) she is not described as a songwriter, why? she is!
3) for instance, Whitney Houston is described (first paragraph) as a songwriter! a joke! i controlled all of her songs and discovered ONLY ONE song she co-wrote ("queen of the night" on the album the bodyguard, and of course there is no criticism about her non-ability to write anything (i'm a huge fan of her anyway))(has been corrected by... me)
4) the general fact there are sources anywhere on the net is not a good reason for a publication on wiki
62.167.44.57 14:15, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

Why is Jamie Cullum listed as an associated act, when there is no mention of him elsewhere in the article, and no mention of Katie on Jamie's page?  If there is a link, then it clearly needs to be explained, or deleted as superfluous information with no backing  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.147.104.224 (talk) 15:03, 16 September 2007 (UTC) 

Agreed; I vote for its removal. --Roddie Digital 14:29, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

should it be "born in Georgian SSR" or "born in Georgia" ? Generally, for the post-Soviet countries, one uses the name of the country if the person did not live all the life in the USSR.
reference [14] ragarding her "Russian" ancestry: The newspaper article merely states that her grandmother had a house in Tuapse, in the Russian portion of the Caucasus mountains, a characteristically multi-ethnic region. I don't think that means that she is of some Russian ancestry.
Dc76\talk 20:28, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
It seems odd to say she was born in the Republic of Georgia in 1984, when the Republic of Georgia didn't exist until 1991. About her being part Russian, though I can't find it online, I've heard her say in many interviews "my grandmother is Russian," and "I'm one quarter Russian". --Hera1187 (talk) 07:40, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
Thank you very much for answering so quickly.
About the first question, obviously we cannot say "she was born in the Republic of Georgia". But I mean to say "she was born in Georgia". Whether it was Soviet Socialist Republic, Republic of, or whatever else, it does not matter. For example, one says that someone "was born in France", not "was born in the Kingdom of France", "was born in the Napoleonic Empire", or "was born in the French Republic". Especially abasing would be "was born in the French State" (the Vichy France). Another example, one does not say "was born in Reichsprotektorat Bohemia" but in Czechoslovakia/Slovakia/etc. Nor does one say "was born in the General Government" but "was born in Poland". Nor does one say "was born in the Confederate States of America", but "was born in the United States of America". Again, obviously nor "Republic of", just "Georgia", which would be the equivalent of "was born in America" instead of USA or CSA.
About the second question. If you heard her say so, then clearly there is nothing to discuss here. Only that ref [14] is, strictly speaking, not sufficient. Nevertheless, in my opinion, it can stay as is, it's more informative this way. We can simply keep this in mind, and when we get a source, we'll just add it. :Dc76\talk 14:38, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

I'm writing the hungarian version of this article, and just need the source of the sentence "Pictures has now sold over 1.3 million copies worldwide, and over 400,000 copies in the UK alone, being certified Platinum and becoming the 49th Best selling album in 2007". Well, I've been looking for the source everywhere, but couldn't find.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.98.130.149 (talk) 11:01, 10 May 2008 (UTC) 

You're right, the source link is missing. No good. When I'll get a chance, I will have a look for it, if noone else won't have done so in the meantime. Maybe this can bring you a bit further for the moment: http://acharts.us/album/28549 Nevermind100 (talk) 11:05, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
Thank you very much... And I'll say thankyou if you'll have a look for it! Daderth from the huwiki  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.98.130.242 (talk) 19:45, 17 June 2008 (UTC) 

I propose the whole paragraph to be cancelled for three reasons:

It's against Katie Melua's well known disapproval about sharing her privacy in public.
The informations are irrelevant with regard to an article about music.
Wikipedia is not a place for speculations, have a look at the Wikipedia: Five Pillars and to the NOR principle.  Nevermind100 (talk) 18:14, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
On your first point, articles are not written for the approval of their subject, they are meant to inform the reader. On your second point, this article is not about Katie Melua's music, it is about Katie Melua, and her relationships are relevant. On your third point, there is no speculation in the section as all statements are well sourced, often using direct quotes from Melua herself. The section should stay. --Hera1187 (talk) 18:46, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
On your first point: Wikipedia does not be a newspaper. Neither it's a tabloid. It's an encyclopedia. On your second/third point: This article should stay within the scope of a music portal project. The private life of an artist is irrelevant, at least unless the artist makes his privacy part of the show like others might do; the things said about being gay (apart from being irrelevant) or not, are mere speculation, there's nothing proofed, there's nothing but gossip. This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons, in my eyes it doesn't.  Nevermind100 (talk) 19:35, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
This is not a music article, its a biography and past relationships with other notable people which inspired songs are notable. As for the gay rumours, they have been discussed extensively above. --Hera1187 (talk) 20:37, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
I refer to " Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous" I have to accept that we are interpreting in two different ways this sentence. As to me it's poorly sourced because sources are daily press and tabloids. The discussion about the gay rumours doesn't have provided any result. Just my two pences, I will end here with my contributions on this behalf.Nevermind100 (talk) 21:26, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
This is a biography, an article about the subject's life, not merely her career. Sourced information about all aspects of the subject's life that are relevant to her life should be present. Even if something is irrelevant to the person's career, it should be included if it is reliably sourced. That is true regardless of whether the article is about a musician, an actor, a sportsperson, a scientist or a serial killer. Qzm (talk) 14:10, 20 September 2009 (UTC)

The German version of this article mentions that Melua's family, after having moved to Batumi, has lived for an unspecified amount of time in Moscow. However, that claim seems not to be sourced. Anyone cares to do some research on that matter, by chance? I lack the time at the moment, unfortunately. Vargher (talk) 01:49, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

Indeed, there is no source to be found at the moment. So I've canceled the claim. Thank you for your observation.--Nevermind100 (talk) 20:15, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
In an interview to Designer Magazine Katie is quoted saying "I lived in Moscow when I was a toddler so I don't remember much of it." And in a blog post, she herself says "I hadn't been back in Moscow since I was three years old."   —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.40.21.42 (talk) 12:27, 19 August 2010 (UTC)

This discussion is transcluded from Talk:Katie Melua/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.
I'm reviewing this article for GA sweeps. After reading through it, there are some things that need to be done to the article to help it maintain GA status:

Many of the references are incompletely formatted, or not formatted at all; no bare URLs.
the following refrences are deadlinks and need to be fixed/replaced: 2, 4, 9, 21, 34, 45, 46, 51, 54, 57, 60, and 65.
Ironically, while most articles are too recentist, this one peters out after 2007, with virtually no information on the past couple years except for what's in the lead. I'm sure she's been up to something of late, add it in.
The Pictures album should be improved a bit with a couple more citations.
There's no structure to the charity work section; it's just a slew of one and two sentence paragraphs.
The acting career feels out of place at the bottom there. Perhaps we could move the information into another section, or just move the acting part up?
All quotes have to be cited. Most are, but there are a couple that aren't in the article.
I'll put the article on hold for five days. If progress is being made I can extend the date though. If no progress is made, the article will be delisted, and when everything is completed it will most likely be retained as a GA. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 20:33, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

I fixed the dead links and standardised the citations. I've also cleared up the charity section, added a little to the Pictures section and re-written and moved the acting section. She really hasn't been doing too much recently (she hasn't released a studio album for three years) but I've added a bit about her almost drowning last year and her recent modelling. --Hera1187 (talk) 16:02, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
Everything looks good, thanks for fixing everything up. Only other thing that's a bit iffy to me is that you mention her growing up to her uncles playing Queen songs twice, and it ends up being a bit repetitive as written. Otherwise, this is back to GA status. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 04:05, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

Name "Melua" is a partitive to finnish word "melu". It means "hard unpleasant voice". :)  Is it ok to tell it in artcile? By the way, in Finland we have an artist name Koriseva, it's mean "stertorous". :D --EsaL-74 (talk) 20:18, 31 May 2010 (UTC)

Shouldn't her name be pronounced ˈmɛlua ? --Morellus (talk) 23:47, 24 November 2011 (UTC)

Yes, the accent should by all means be after the first vocal. But I am not abel to edit it in the article. How to manage…? --Christian47 (talk) 21:53, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
As long as there is not reliable source for its pronunciation, the name should not be rendered phonetically altogether in the article. --Abderitestatos (talk) 14:30, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
There do exist a lot of good sources proving the correct pronunciation, for example: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LqY-rBM-eo0, but also any BBC trasmission or similar UK shows featuring Katie Melua. The accent on the second vocal is the wrong one used by many german speakers. Nevermind100 (talk) 19:35, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Katie Melua. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080505051535/http://www.youtube.com:80/watch?v=AAyoaezBa_o&feature=related to http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AAyoaezBa_o
Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100128140638/http://www.katiemelua.com:80/releases/itsonlypain.html to http://www.katiemelua.com/releases/itsonlypain.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 15:32, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 5 external links on Katie Melua. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090804141114/http://www.teentoday.co.uk:80/music/musicinterviews/katiemelua.shtml to http://www.teentoday.co.uk/music/musicinterviews/katiemelua.shtml
Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090207201100/http://www.katiemelua.com:80/releases/shyboy.html to http://www.katiemelua.com/releases/shyboy.html
Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090802101940/http://www.femalefirst.co.uk:80/entertainment/34042004.html to http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/entertainment/34042004.html
Added archive https://web.archive.org/20140907011510/http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ICIXDJ0G9ok to http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ICIXDJ0G9ok
Added archive https://web.archive.org/20071108225253/http://music.monstersandcritics.com:80/news/article_1283055.php/Echo_Awards_handed_out_in_Berlin to http://music.monstersandcritics.com/news/article_1283055.php/Echo_Awards_handed_out_in_Berlin
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 23:15, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Katie Melua. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20090802082904/http://www.yorkshiretoday.co.uk:80/ViewArticle2.aspx?SectionID=105&ArticleID=1878698 to http://www.yorkshiretoday.co.uk/ViewArticle2.aspx?SectionID=105&ArticleID=1878698
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 14:30, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Links number 5 and 6 validating the sentence "In 2006, she was the United Kingdom's best-selling female artist..." in the first paragraph are dead.  Also, the statement doesn't have sufficient actuality and relevance to appear in the first paragraph of the article. Can we move it further down or omit it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.148.149.55 (talk) 09:23, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Katie Melua. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090803140800/http://www.recordoftheday.com/cgi-bin/rotd-mb/rotd_config.pl?noframes%3Bread=99599 to http://www.recordoftheday.com/cgi-bin/rotd-mb/rotd_config.pl?noframes%3Bread=99599
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100202185140/http://epiphone.com/news.asp?NewsID=313 to http://www.epiphone.com/news.asp?NewsID=313
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090606044946/http://www.thebiographychannel.co.uk/biography_facts/1500%3A1707%3A1/Katie_Melua.htm to http://www.thebiographychannel.co.uk/biography_facts/1500%3A1707%3A1/Katie_Melua.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:30, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Katie Melua. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100131104740/http://hangout.altsounds.com/features/103634-q-and-a-interview-with-andrea-mcewan.html to http://hangout.altsounds.com/features/103634-q-and-a-interview-with-andrea-mcewan.html
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071009100001/http://www.savethechildren.org.uk/en/55_1399.htm to http://www.savethechildren.org.uk/en/55_1399.htm
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140426105401/http://www.iomtoday.co.im/news/isle-of-man-news/company-announces-its-charity-of-the-year-1-6407282 to http://www.iomtoday.co.im/news/isle-of-man-news/company-announces-its-charity-of-the-year-1-6407282
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:57, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Katie Melua. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090306221517/http://movies.about.com/od/justlikeheaven/a/heaven082205.htm to http://movies.about.com/od/justlikeheaven/a/heaven082205.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:43, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1500734/How-Katie-put-the-science-back-into-songwriting.html  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.86.117.208 (talk) 20:07, 26 August 2018 (UTC) 

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Melua (surname) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RMCD bot 20:49, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

Putting source that describes her as English : [3], [4], [5], [6], [7]. NewThere (talk) 14:26, 13 August 2022 (UTC)

I do not think either would qualify as WP:RS.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:48, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Reason? NewThere (talk) 14:49, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
It is your responsibility to read WP:RS, WP:4RR, and then give a reason. Ymblanter (talk) 14:53, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
You are the one doubting my sources there though. NewThere (talk) 14:53, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
The first 3 sources are copied directly from WP itself, which makes them utterly useless, and so are the last two. PRAXIDICAE🌈 15:36, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
The very last one is in fact a blog. Ymblanter (talk) 15:37, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
I meant "utterly useless" re: last two. But yes. PRAXIDICAE🌈 15:43, 13 August 2022 (UTC)