# Talk:HMS Romney (1762)

This review is transcluded from Talk:HMS Romney (1762)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 03:39, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality: 
I'm not used to seeing "in Ordinary" capitalized in modern histories.
B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists: 
Places of publication for all references would be nice, but not required.
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources: 

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary: 

C. No original research: 

Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects: 
Is Romney named for anything? Link Captain, Rear-Admiral and Vice-Admiral. Fix the red link in the infobox.
B. Focused: 

Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias: 

Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc: 

Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales: 

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions: 

Overall:
Pass or Fail: 

Issues fixed. For the name, I presume it's named for the Earl of Romney, but can't find a cite for that. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 23:18, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

Quite likely, but as it's unconfirmed...--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 23:33, 24 October 2010 (UTC)