# Talk:Ekeberg Line

In the second last paragraph in "Threat of closure and renewal" where the article discusses the lack of suitable material after the removal of the Gullfisk in 1976, the article states "Instead, used SM91 trams from the Gothenburg Tramway were put into service."
I am unsure whether this is correct, because the SM91 were delivered to Oslo in the early 1990s (although of course, the SM91/M25 trams are much older than that). I wonder if the article are referring to the MBG trams [1], which were also imported second-hand from Sweden. Sjakkalle (Check!) 09:53, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

Yes, that could very well be true. I think the source used the term "Göteborgtrikkene" or "Svensketrikkene" or something like that, and I just made an erroneous assumption of which one they were referring to. The book is back at the library, so I can't really double check. Arsenikk (talk) 11:15, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Ekeberg Line. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.aftenposten.no/nyheter/oslo/article423126.ece
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.noblad.no/nyheter/vil-forlenge-trikken-fra-ljabru-til-hauketo-1.5800041
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.aftenposten.no/nyheter/oslo/article1972873.ece
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.ostkantavisa.no/nyheter/vil-ha-trikke-ring-rundt-gamlebyen-1.5713381
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140314040054/https://ruter.no/trafikkflyt/endringer/ekebergbanen-oppgraderes/ to https://ruter.no/trafikkflyt/endringer/ekebergbanen-oppgraderes/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:09, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Ekeberg Line. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101105071920/http://trafikanten.no/Gallery/1-GalleryRot/24-Rutetabeller/25-2010/26-Oslo/Sporvogn%20h101.pdf to http://trafikanten.no/Gallery/1-GalleryRot/24-Rutetabeller/25-2010/26-Oslo/Sporvogn%20h101.pdf
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.aftenposten.no/nyheter/oslo/article423126.ece
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.noblad.no/nyheter/vil-forlenge-trikken-fra-ljabru-til-hauketo-1.5800041
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.aftenposten.no/nyheter/oslo/article1972873.ece
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.ostkantavisa.no/nyheter/vil-ha-trikke-ring-rundt-gamlebyen-1.5713381
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:45, 18 September 2017 (UTC)