# Talk:New Jersey Route 83

This review is transcluded from Talk:New Jersey Route 83/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
GA review (see here for criteria)
This article needs some work in order for me to consider this as a GA.
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose):  b (MoS): 
The prose is very messy, for example: You use "meets" many times in the description, try "intersects"; "oute 83 was originally legislated as a part of Route 49 in 1927", what does legislated mean?
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 

It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 

It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars etc.: 

It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 

Overall:
Pass/Fail: 
My greatest concern is the prose, so I am putting the article on hold. ~~ ComputerGuy 22:16, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
I have gone back and made the suggested changes. Dough4872 (talk) 02:25, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
Okay, to pass it, get a map in SVG form. ~~ ComputerGuy 23:11, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
I have put in a request for a map at Wikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Roads/Maps task force/Requests and I am still waiting. Dough4872 (talk) 02:25, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
It has been almost 2 weeks, no map, failed. ~~ ComputerGuy 20:08, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

This article should not have been failed due to lack of a map. Articles are passed or failed according to the good article criteria, and in addition, there is nothing the nominator could have done to create a map. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 20:34, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
Okay then, still on hold. ~~ ComputerGuy 20:56, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
The article has a map now Dough4872 (talk) 15:36, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
This article is now a GA. PASS ~~ ComputerGuy 00:26, 26 November 2008 (UTC)

This article has failed the USRD GA audit and will be sent to WP:GAR if the issues are not resolved within one week. Please see WT:USRD for more details, and please ask me if you have any questions as to why this article failed. --Rschen7754 (T C) 04:23, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

Is this because of the repetition in the route description? I'm a bit confused... –Juliancolton | Talk 04:28, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
Ah, I see.  Done. –Juliancolton | Talk 04:37, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on New Jersey Route 83. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070216064437/http://www.capemaycountygov.net/Cit-e-Access/webpage.cfm?TID=5&TPID=802 to http://www.capemaycountygov.net/Cit-e-Access/webpage.cfm?TID=5&TPID=802
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160313112746/http://jimmyandsharonwilliams.com/njroads/1920s/images/1927_routes.gif to http://www.jimmyandsharonwilliams.com/njroads/1920s/images/1927_routes.gif
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110628183145/http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/1953_New_Jersey_state_highway_renumbering to http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/1953_New_Jersey_state_highway_renumbering
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.njsendems.com/release.asp?rid=621
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:06, 17 February 2018 (UTC)