# Talk:Danton-class battleship

This review is transcluded from Talk:Danton-class battleship/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Seabuckthorn (talk · contribs) 13:12, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
Nominator: Sturmvogel 66 (talk)
Hi! My review for this article will be here shortly.  --Seabuckthorn ♥ 13:12, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

1: Well-written

a. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors: 
b. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists: 

2: Verifiable with no original research

a. Has an appropriate reference section:  Yes
b. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:  excellent (Thorough check on Google. Cross-checked with other FAs)

c. No original research:   Done

3: Broad in its coverage

4: Neutral

5: Stable: No edit wars, etc:  Yes
6: Images  Done (PD)

I'm glad to see your work here. As per the above checklist there are no issues with the article and it’s a GA. 
Promoting the article to GA status.  --Seabuckthorn ♥ 02:26, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for the review.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 03:31, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

@Sturmvogel 66: I thought you'd want to be made aware of this thread, and especially this comment reply. Ed [talk] [OMT] 05:40, 16 June 2025 (UTC)

Thanks, Ed, I'll check it out.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 08:24, 16 June 2025 (UTC)