# Talk:Chalke

This review is transcluded from Talk:Chalke/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Pyrotec (talk) 22:23, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

Starting review. Pyrotec (talk) 22:23, 26 October 2009 (UTC)


### Overall summary
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

A short, but comprehensive and well-written, article on an Byzantine topic.
Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality: 

B. MoS compliance: 

Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources: 

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary: 

C. No original research: 

Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects: 
Well-referenced.
B. Focused: 
Well-referenced.
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias: 

Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc: 

Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales: 
Well-referenced.
B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions: 
Well-referenced.
Overall:
Pass or Fail: 

Congratulations on the quality of the article, I'm awarding GA-status. Pyrotec (talk) 22:51, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

Thanks a lot! Cheers, Constantine   ✍  00:14, 27 October 2009 (UTC)