# Talk:Get It Right (Glee cast song)

Can I ask why the page is currently titled "Get It Right (Glee Cast song)", as opposed to "Get It Right (Glee cast song)"? J Milburn (talk) 15:46, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

Glee Cast is the name of the group: a proper noun. Yves (talk) 16:47, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
Ok, makes sense. J Milburn (talk) 16:56, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Get It Right (Glee Cast song)/GA2. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: FeuDeJoie (talk) 19:08, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
--FeuDeJoie (talk) 19:08, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
Obviously you saw my review before, (got your message) and looking through it the changes you have made seem to have developed the article correctly. I will be looking through it in more detail tomorrow but the bets are that it is going to become a GA.


### Original review
### Prose
Article is generally well written;
Introduction

The sentence "who produced the song, with his wife, Nikki Hassman," is there need for repetitive commas - "who produced the song with his wife Nikki Hassman". Edit punctuation Microsoft Word grammar check flagged this as incorrect also. --Done.
Background

Same problem as above with the second sentence in the section.--Better
The remainder of the section is very well written and punctuation is excellent.
Composition

Well written, no obvious problems.
Critical reception

Voerding, Who is this? You have previously discussed him in the composition section but for a first time reader it seems as if he is a random person as no publisher is listed in this section only in the composition section. It is confusing. Add more detail.
Other than listed above the section is easy to read, factual and understandable.--Done
Chart performance

Chart positions need its own section change positions to a separate section: Charts.--Done
Well written, factual and clear.


### Factually accurate?
No problems; no outstanding references needed, no original research and all notable.


### Coverage
Factual, doesn't waffle and everything is relevant.


### Neutral
Not biased, Critical reception show a good mix of responses.


### Stable
No edit wars. Stable.


### References
Critical reception

Reference 5 Seattle Post-Intelligencer, it is repeated twice in one continuous sentence. Why? --Done.


### Overall
All the issues have been met, I will pass this now. Thanks for the changes.

Thank you for taking the time to conduct a second review. Much appreciated! Frickative 01:09, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Get It Right (Glee cast song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110320181653/http://itunes.apple.com/us/album/get-it-right-glee-cast-version/id423960196 to http://itunes.apple.com/us/album/get-it-right-glee-cast-version/id423960196
Added archive https://archive.is/20120722140947/http://www.chartstats.com/artistinfo.php?id=12473 to http://www.chartstats.com/artistinfo.php?id=12473
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:46, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Get It Right (Glee cast song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110319054600/http://www.nypost.com/p/blogs/popwrap/which_original_glee_song_would_you_anBnMqHaq3hJEcSPI3umTN to http://www.nypost.com/p/blogs/popwrap/which_original_glee_song_would_you_anBnMqHaq3hJEcSPI3umTN
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:57, 15 October 2017 (UTC)