# Talk:Jane Eyre (1910 film)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Jane Eyre (1910 film)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Good888 (talk · contribs) 20:53, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

Lead section

"but it is possible that Lloyd Lonergan adapted the work." Change possible to presumed.
: Done See rewrite. "probably" 7&6=thirteen (☎) 14:48, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
"but not without minor faults" Change faults to criticism.
 Done See rewrite.  7&6=thirteen (☎) 14:12, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
References

Link the publishers of these sources.
 Done 7&6=thirteen (☎) 13:49, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
Categories

Add this film to the lost films category.
 Done 7&6=thirteen (☎) 13:49, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
Images

I assume there aren't any images/posters of this film?
Going to place on hold for now. good888 (talk) 12:52, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

Shouldn't the plot summary be in a block quote?  7&6=thirteen (☎) 14:00, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
I dislike block quotes because they are distracting and are not a requirement. I have not found any image stills or posters for the film, otherwise I would have included it. I also dislike how common the errors with stage productions being labeled "photoplays" shows up in books. I did some checking with two very prominent errors in the St. Elmo article, but none seem to be mislabeled for this one. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 18:53, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
I was just suggesting, not decreeing.  I am also unable to put in block quotes, as they seem to have done something to the template.  In any event, I was just asking, and its not a burning issue for me. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 22:11, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
No worries - you've reviewed my articles before and I know you mean well. I'm not objecting over ownership issues or anything, but I do understand the sentiment to use them. I just never seen them used in plot summaries and they really draw the eye away in sections where they do exist. Personally... I dislike block quotes for that reason. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 02:46, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
Thanks 7&6=thirteen for the edits you have made to this article! And thanks ChrisGualtieri for uploading a poster of this film and all the other edits you have made! With all issues addressed, I am promoting to GA class. good888 (talk) 09:28, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

Black listed site and the Italian first film.  Comprehensive Guide to Jane Eyre Adaptations
By Painted Seahorse October 24, 2012  http://FILLER 
paintedseahorse.hubpages.com/hub/FILLER
Comprehensive-Guide-to-Jane-Eyre-Adaptations 
first American (and second worldwide)   I rather think this is an important discussion in this single article, which I would like to have not blacklisted as I think it would benefit this article.  I put in the words FILLER so that this would not be left on the cutting room floor. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 01:06, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

Sorry, but I don't think hubpages is going to get listed when I am citing the Rare Book School at the University of Virginia for the same information. It may not be the best and most clear citation, but I think the source I am using is more than adequate to say something exists. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 02:45, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
That black-listed site says: "The first American film adaptation was released in 1910, and it was a silent picture. I say first American film adaptation, because Italy released a silent film adaptation in 1909 (“The Enthusiast’s Guide to Jane Eyre Adaptations”)"  7&6=thirteen (☎) 03:01, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
Only question I have is why this source when the one being used states: "The first known film of "Jane Eyre" came out as a silent Italian movie in 1909."[1] Same information and it corrects an omission in a few other publications and indexes. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 06:00, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
It's cumulative.  But there is static about the sources at DYK, and its existence is probative.  A straw in the pile.  10:57, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
DYK is icky - I would have gone with Edwin Thanhouser crediting this film as the one that secured the success of the company. The 1909 Italian production is something even I have very little on. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 17:07, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
I was thinking fist American/English language movie version of the novel... You are right about DYK.  But it is what it is, and we can't change the course.  Only how we play it.  7&6=thirteen (☎) 22:30, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

"When the Studio Burned". February 24, 2013 source was copied from Thanhauser Studio. Inadvertently forgot to put this in my edit summary.  7&6=thirteen (☎) 14:31, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
One of the citation links is broken.--Paleface Jack (talk) 01:36, 28 June 2017 (UTC)