# Talk:I Wanna Go

It charted at number 138 on the UK Singles Chart. Source: [1] My love is love (talk) 10:26, 8 December 2011 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:I Wanna Go/GA2. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Calvin999 (talk · contribs) 16:33, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose):  b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): 

It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 

It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 

It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 

It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 

Overall:
Pass/Fail: 

**Please put a  Done next to every point you have amended, or put a  Not done next to ones you have not done, with a reason.**


#### Info Box
#### Lead
#### Background and artwork
#### Composition
#### Remixes
#### Critical reception
#### Chart performance
#### Music video (Development)
### Music video (Synopsis)
### Music video (Release and reception)
### Live performances
### Track listings
### Credits and personnel
### Charts
### Radio date and release history
### References
This GAN has gone on for two months. You really should try and solve issues yourself when asked multiple times! This could have been passed weeks and weeks ago. I have corrected outstanding issues and the article is passed. Aaron • You Da One 11:55, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

Please change the position that the song reached on France charts, because the correct position is #1 no #5 and I have the source that can support it (http://top40-charts.com/chart.php?cid=11&date=2011-09-11) this is the link and also the posotion reached in Brazil, because the correct position is #3 no #31 and here also is the link to support it (http://top40-charts.com/chart.php?cid=8&date=2011-09-03)also please add the Taiwan Charts, because the song reached #9 position (http://top40-charts.com/chart.php?cid=14&date=2011-05-28). Please change them.

Randy55randy (talk) 18:29, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

 Partly done: I've done the first two but the Taiwanese one is not the official link for the Taiwanese charts so I don't want to put it on. Have you got a better source?  --andy4789 ★ · (talk? contribs?) 00:24, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
Sorry, they are unofficial links. Please reply with links from the official chart sources that verify your claims. --andy4789 ★ · (talk? contribs?) 00:28, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

The article says that Spears now has the third most top 10 singles on the US chart with this being her 12th top ten. I don't see how that is possible since Madonna alone as at least 35. Am I reading this note wrong? --Shadow (talk) 05:41, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

It's not wrong. It's the her first album to have three top ten singles. In total, she has 12 top ten singles (BOMT, Crazy, OOPS, Toxic, Gimme More, Womanizer, Circus, 3, HIAM, IWG, TTWE, S&M Remix). - Saulo Talk to Me 12:41, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
I'm not referring to that. It says "....her twelfth top ten hit overall, the third-highest female total since her first week on the chart, behind Rihanna with eighteen and Beyoncé Knowles with fourteen". Problem is, Britney does not have the third most top tens, Beyonce doesn't have the second most top tens, and Rihanna isn't in first. However, this is coming from billboard so I would like to know why they say this. --Shadow (talk) 16:53, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
Billboard says, "Dating to Spears' first week in the Hot 100's top 10 (Dec. 12, 1998), she trails only Rihanna (18) and Beyonce (14) for most top 10s among women." - Saulo Talk to Me 18:38, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on I Wanna Go. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110518073607/http://www.samesame.com.au/reviews/6541/CD-Britney--Femme-Fatale.htm to http://www.samesame.com.au/reviews/6541/CD-Britney--Femme-Fatale.htm
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110502121259/http://www.collegian.psu.edu/archive/2011/04/05/Britney_Spears_new_release.aspx to http://www.collegian.psu.edu/archive/2011/04/05/Britney_Spears_new_release.aspx
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120225020403/http://blogs.suntimes.com/music/2011/03/cd_review_britney_spears_femme.html to http://blogs.suntimes.com/music/2011/03/cd_review_britney_spears_femme.html
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110624041147/http://www.nypost.com/p/blogs/popwrap/don_make_promises_you_can_keep_britney_EZnt3I2LvJU860cEdBI5QO to http://www.nypost.com/p/blogs/popwrap/don_make_promises_you_can_keep_britney_EZnt3I2LvJU860cEdBI5QO
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.billboard.biz/bbbiz/charts/internationalcharts/mexico
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.ifpi.dk/?q=content%2Fbritney-spears-i
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:41, 8 April 2017 (UTC)