# Talk:Dreamland (Coney Island, 1904)

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page.  Peer reviewers: Jiarong Gong.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 19:50, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

The wikipedia articles of Coney Island's Dreamland and Coney Island's Luna Park have different photos of the same park.  Staceygarratt 22:33, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

Good catch. Borh photos are Dreamland. -- Cecropia 16:33, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Dreamland (amusement park). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20040703033332/http://history.amusement-parks.com:80/Dreamland.html to http://history.amusement-parks.com/Dreamland.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:54, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

Early editions of The New York Times claimed the incubator babies had perished in the flames,[108] but the infants were all saved,[111] and the Times subsequently corrected itself.[114] 
As it is written it is unclear, atleast to me, how exactly the Times corrected itself (were some incubator babies saved? Or did some infants die?)
I believe the sentence should be edited to clarify this ThatApollo777 (talk) 15:39, 30 August 2023 (UTC)

The very next line does mention saving of incubator babies but I still feel that sentence would benefit from a rewrite
It's in Destruction -> Fire -> paragraph 3 ThatApollo777 (talk) 15:42, 30 August 2023 (UTC)