# Talk:K-60 (Kansas highway)

This review is transcluded from Talk:K-60 (Kansas highway)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Dough4872 02:18, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose):  b (MoS): 
Do not use "then" when describing progression of route in route description.
Removed instance of "then". — PCB 03:06, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 

It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 
Is a more exact establishment date for the road known?
I believe it is 1932 but I cannot verify this as I do not have a 1931 map. — PCB 03:00, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 

It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 
An image of the road would be nice, but not required.
Overall:
Pass/Fail: 
I will place the article on hold for a couple concerns to be addressed. Dough4872 02:18, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

I will now pass the article. Dough4872 03:16, 12 April 2011 (UTC)