# Talk:Brave Bunnies

I've requested a quick assessment from WIG, in part to see if this article would qualify under "women's works". The series creator, creative director and art director are women. Otherwise, I'm pretty satisfied with the article, given available sources, but wouldn't mind any advice moving toward GAN. – Reidgreg (talk) 02:26, 4 May 2025 (UTC)

@Reidgreg: This would definitely qualify as a women's work if the creator is a woman. Here's a 20-minute assessment:
Why is the original Ukrainian name in all-capital letters? Is it stylised that way originally? If so, why isn't the English translation also stylised in all-caps?
Fixed title case: ХОРОБРІ ЗАЙЦІ → Хоробрі Зайці
"As the bus stops at a new location, [...]" Perhaps it should be "Each time the bus stops [...]"?
I tried merging that clause into the previous sentence.
"The writing team consulted with child psychologists" Is there anything else that could be added about this?
Good call.  Expanded: Cherepanova was educated in psychology, and the writing team consulted with child psychologists throughout the process. They sought to maintain the interest of young children, present stories that would aid early socialization, and create characters representing the many different human personality types.  (This is covered by the extant sources).
"Production resumed in August" Where did production resume if they had to flee Kyiv?
I didn't have a lot of detail on this. My only source is an interview with the creator who said that work resumed six months after the invasion.  I don't know if they were able to return to their offices, find new offices, or teleconference from different locations in Ukraine and abroad.  Three-four months after that WildBrain joined the production... which suggests to me that they may not have been in full-scale production until then, for whatever reasons.
Merge the sentence about the focus group into the previous paragraph, per the manual of style on paragraphs.
Done.
Is there more that can be added on the books and merchandising? If not, it might be worth merging this into another section, as it is currently an extremely short section.
If merging it, the article would end up with a section header like "Reception and merchandising" which I think would be more awkward and surprising than the short section.  I'll see if I can plump it up a bit without becoming too promotional.  (Addendum) I was able to add a bit more; it's still a short section but doesn't look weirdly short.
Overall, I think this is a very well-written and interesting article. My comments on this are relatively minor. With some extra clarity and a bit more expansion (if possible), I think this would be ready for a good article nomination. --Grnrchst (talk) 12:36, 5 May 2025 (UTC)
@Grnrchst: much thanks for the assessment, I feel this will make GAN go a bit smoother.  I've taken care of the easy fixes and will look a little further for expansions. – Reidgreg (talk) 15:08, 5 May 2025 (UTC)