# Talk:Hurricane Fefa

I upped it to B. íslenskur fellibylur #12 (samtal) 22:30, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

As you hurricane guys/gals always do, you've created an excellent article. This one, in particular, certainly meets all of the requirements of WP:WIAGA. My only suggestions would be to explain the path shown in Image:Fefa 1991 track.png- that is, which direction was the hurricane travelling (even if this seems obvious) and what the different colors mean- and, as should always be done for every article, do another copyedit. Otherwise, the article is superb. -- Kicking222 19:55, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

As part of the WikiProject Good Articles, we're doing sweeps to go over all of the current GAs and see if they still meet the GA criteria. I'm specifically going over all of the "Meteorology and atmospheric sciences" articles. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. I have made several minor corrections throughout the article. Altogether the article is well-written and is still in great shape after its passing in 2006. Continue to improve the article making sure all new information is properly sourced and neutral. It would also be beneficial to update the access dates of the website sources. If you have any questions, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. I have updated the article history to reflect this review. Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 09:53, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

I know it appears that NHC simply replaced and it seems only speculation that the name Fefa was retired. I have moved the article from Hurricane Fefa (1991) back to "Hurricane Fefa", because now there is proof that the name Fefa was retired, and not simply replaced. See here for the list of retired Atlantic and East Pacific names.--12george1 (talk) 17:16, 27 November 2010 (UTC)

I wouldn't consider that list proof of anything. It also includes Knut, which was a fish storm and didn't do anything (appears to have been simply replaced). --Hurricanehink (talk) 19:23, 27 November 2010 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Hurricane Fefa. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120205060537/http://images.jsc.nasa.gov/luceneweb/caption_direct.jsp?photoId=STS043-74-005 to http://images.jsc.nasa.gov/luceneweb/caption_direct.jsp?photoId=STS043-74-005
Corrected formatting/usage for https://www.wmo.int/pages/prog/www/tcp/documents/TCP30_Edition2012.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:49, 9 November 2017 (UTC)