# Talk:Béla III of Hungary

Did he ever call himself "Belo"? but if the alternate names in his subjects' languages are named, then why not Adalbert, the German form, used by many of his ethnic German subjects.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.70.38.242 (talk) 01:17, 4 July 2008 (UTC) 
The article says he was granted a duchy by his mother but her article doesn't mention it. On the other hand, the article on his father says that prior to the father's death, he granted an appanage duchy to his son Béla. In that case it appears that the wrong parent is credited in this article. Mikenlesley (talk) 04:23, 23 April 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for your message. I fixed the problem. Borsoka (talk) 05:07, 23 April 2020 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Béla III of Hungary/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: 3family6 (talk · contribs) 04:14, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors: 
No copyvios detected, just some Wikipedia mirrors.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 20:48, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
High quality, polished prose.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 04:37, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists: 
Follow MOS.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 04:37, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. Has an appropriate reference section: 
Well formatted reference sections provided.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 04:37, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
B. Citations to reliable sources, where necessary: 
If anything, the article is over-cited.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 04:37, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
C. No original research: 
All content is verifiable and attributable to sources.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 04:37, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects: 
Sticks to major aspects.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 04:37, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
B. Focused: 
Focused on subject, no extraneous material.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 04:37, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias: 
Neutral, balanced discussion, with differing historical perspectives provided where appropriate.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 04:37, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc: 
No instances of edit warring, vandalism, or other disruption since this article was created in 2003.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 20:48, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content: 
All licensing checks out. I took the liberty of filling out a few parameters on some images.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 20:48, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions: 
Images are useful, relevant, and have appropriate captions.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 20:48, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
Overall: An excellent article, ready for FAC in my opinion.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 04:37, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Pass or Fail: 

When did Manuel conquer Bosnia, Dalmatia and Syrmia? The article about Manuel I Komnenos (FA) suggests 1167, but this article (GA) says 1165. Surtsicna (talk) 13:39, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

This article does not say that Manuel conquered these provinces in 1165. The article says that Manuel seized the provinces by bringing Béla/Alexios (the ruler of the three provinces) to his court in 1163. Afterwards, Béla's brother, Stephen III made several attempts to reconquer the three provinces. Borsoka (talk) 15:13, 13 February 2022 (UTC)