# Talk:New York State Route 32B

This review is transcluded from Talk:New York State Route 32B/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

GA review (see here for criteria)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose):  b (MoS): 
".2 mi (0.32 km)" looks like a rounding error.
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 

It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 
Is there at least a rough estimate of how long the initial length of the highway is? If it used to be fairly long (> 50 miles or so) the map is misleading me into thinking this was a tiny road.
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars etc.: 

It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 
An image of the current route is preferred, but in this case not necessary due to the short length of the road.
Overall:
Pass/Fail: 
Few questions, but otherwise good. —Rob (talk) 03:59, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
All things clarified and/or fixed. Thanks!Mitch32(UP) 10:24, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
Passing, but a couple of suggestions - the article could use an image, and a real map. If you have one of U.S. 4 in New York, crop it to the portion between Northumberland and Hudson Falls and use that instead - it's better than the misleading(ish) map. I'd probably drop the existing map altogether - I don't even know where in New York that is! :-) —Rob (talk) 04:00, 3 July 2008 (UTC)