# Talk:French battleship Démocratie

This review is transcluded from Talk:French battleship Démocratie/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: MathewTownsend (talk · contribs) 15:56, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

Hi, I'll review this shortly.  MathewTownsend (talk) 15:56, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
reveiw
A very nice article. I made a few minor edits which you're free to revert.[1]
I've only a few comments:

"She displaced up to 14,489 metric tons (14,260 long tons; 15,971 short tons) at full load. She had a crew of between 739 and 769 officers and enlisted men. She was powered by three vertical triple expansion engines with twenty-two Belleville boilers. " three sentences in a row start with "She".
"Démocratie 22.7 percent hits," - is there a word left out here?
Otherwise all is fine. will put on hold while you look over my comments.
Best wishes,  MathewTownsend (talk) 16:45, 15 September 2012 (UTC)

Both should be fixed now, thanks for reviewing the article! Parsecboy (talk) 17:25, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
GA review-see WP:WIAGA for  criteria (and here for what they are not)

Is it reasonably well written?
a. prose: clear and concise, respects copyright laws, correct spelling and grammar:

b. complies with  MoS for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, summary style and list incorporation: 

Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
a. provides references to all sources in the section(s) dedicated to footnotes/citations according to the guide to layout: 

b. provides in-line citations from reliable sources where necessary: 

c. no original research: 

Is it broad in its coverage?
a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic: 

b. it remains focused and does not go into unnecessary detail (see summary style): 

Does it follow the neutral point of view policy.
fair representation without bias: 

Is it stable?
no edit wars, etc: 

Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
a. images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales: 

b. images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions: 

Overall:
Pass or Fail: 
pass!

Congratulations!  MathewTownsend (talk) 19:30, 15 September 2012 (UTC)