# Talk:Hesketh Hesketh-Prichard

This review is transcluded from Talk:Hesketh Hesketh-Prichard/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
  1. Well-written:

(a) the prose is clear and the spelling and grammar are correct;

Yes. Because I am not as familiar with British English grammar, I have assumed that any eccentricities to my eyes are variations from American English.
(b) it complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, jargon, words to avoid, fiction, and list incorporation.

Yes.
  2. Factually accurate and verifiable:

(a) it provides references to all sources of information, and at minimum contains a section dedicated to the attribution of those sources in accordance with the guide to layout;

Yes.
(b) at minimum, it provides in-line citations from reliable sources for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons;

Yes.
(c) it contains no original research.

Yes.
  3. Broad in its coverage:

(a) it addresses the main aspects of the topic;

Yes.
(b) it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail.

Yes.
  4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without bias.

Yes.
  5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day-to-day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.

Yes.
  6. Illustrated, if possible, by images:

(a) images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content;

Yes.
(b) images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.

Yes.
I see no reason not to consider this a good article. Congratulations. JKBrooks85 (talk) 08:04, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Hesketh Hesketh-Prichard. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20071217142748/http://www.queens.cam.ac.uk:80/Queens/Record/1998/History/WartimeMystery.html to http://www.queens.cam.ac.uk/queens/Record/1998/History/WartimeMystery.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 02:30, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

Fixed —BillC talk 17:07, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Hesketh Hesketh-Prichard. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110531161530/http://www.gesa.com.ar/pdf/Pascual_Ciancio_et_al_03.pdf to http://www.gesa.com.ar/pdf/Pascual_Ciancio_et_al_03.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:49, 1 April 2017 (UTC)