# Talk:Cedillo v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

I have moved the above discussion, which took place as the peer review was opened, to the peer review. The peer review is transcluded below: LT90001 (talk) 00:02, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

This needs to be clarified but I don't have the time right now. To the uninitiated it does appear as if they are different people.--Daffydavid (talk) 15:12, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

Not every article requires images and adding images that are at best peripheral is not the way to go. The measles image is debatable but the latest added image (I assume it is thimerosal) is not labeled properly and even it was it would still be debatable. Are there no images of protesters outside the court during the trial or something similar? Maybe an image of one of the claimants that is free use.--Daffydavid (talk) 16:20, 19 October 2013 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Cedillo v. Secretary of Health and Human Services. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140209235500/http://www.hrsa.gov/vaccinecompensation/omnibusautism.html to http://www.hrsa.gov/vaccinecompensation/omnibusautism.html
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.uscfc.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/autism/Expert%20Reports/Cedillo_98-916V/Mot_IL_Att_4_Bustin_Affidavit_98-916.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:34, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

I don't know how this happened, but the Omnibus Autism Proceeding contains 6 test cases, and Cedillo is one of them, but not all of them that established for the Vaccine Court that vaccines were not linked to autism. To conflate the Omnibus Autism Proceeding with Cedillo gives the reader a wrong impression on how this process happened. I don't even know where to start to fix this article, but I'd remove the redirect from Omnibus Autism Proceeding to this article. OAP requires its own article which would link to Cedillo. SkepticalRaptor (talk) 00:32, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for pointing this out. I just removed the bolded OAP from the lead so it's not being portrayed as synonymous with this specific case, and I just tagged Omnibus Autism Proceeding for speedy deletion. Every Morning (there's a halo...) 01:04, 7 February 2018 (UTC)