# Talk:David Freese

I think that's Berkman in the picture. I'd prefer a newer picture with his current number.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.61.227.215 (talk) 03:42, 6 October 2011 (UTC) 
You are right, that is Berkman. The photo is not David Freese.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 164.144.252.26 (talk) 18:07, 28 October 2011 (UTC) 

No, that is Freese in the picture. He used to wear #12, which Berkman now wears. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:16, 28 October 2011 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:David Freese/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Resolute (talk · contribs) 23:06, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose):  b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): 

It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 

It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 

It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 

It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 

Overall:
Pass/Fail: 

General
Images are good
Not required for GA, but alternative text is always a good idea for images
Sources are good
No concerns with close paraphrasing
Lead
No need to state twice that he declined a scholarship from Missouri.
Player of the week award in the infobox? That seems remarkably trivial when compared to the rest of the awards.
Early life
It seems that RBI was never spelled out and linked to the appropriate article on first mention.
Professional career
Link to sacrifice fly on first mention?
Link to Option (baseball) on first mention?
Overall
The issues I found are all very minor, pretty much only a couple of spots where linking to an article is beneficial to a reader without a great understanding of baseball.  I've added these links myself, and see no reason not to pass this nomination outright.  Regards, Resolute 23:06, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

Thank you! This feedback will be useful if I ever attempt to take this to FA. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:28, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

A number of citations in this article unnecessarily include the publisher for periodicals and websites that have their own Wikipedia article. This information has no value to anyone wanting to check or track down references. For example, publisher=Washington Post Company for references to The Washington Post, or publisher=MLB Advanced Media for references to MLB.com, only make the article longer - significantly longer when repeated many times - without adding anything useful. Therefore I plan to  upgrade the article's citations to remove all such redundant publisher info, bringing them into line with the recommended use of the cite template (see Template:Citation#Publisher).  I'll also remove redundant 'location' parameters (e.g. work=New York Times|location=New York), as suggested by the template's usage guidelines. Please raise any questions here or on my talk page. Colonies Chris (talk) 20:05, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on David Freese. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150210223008/http://familytreemaker.genealogy.com/users/f/r/e/Guy-R-Freese/ to http://familytreemaker.genealogy.com/users/f/r/e/Guy-R-Freese/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:19, 5 September 2017 (UTC)