# Talk:Nicholas de Balmyle

GA review (see here for criteria)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose):  b (MoS): 
The prose could stand some further work before the article is promoted much beyond GA.  For example, the use of semicolons should be curtailed (there are three sentences in a row with semicolons at one point), and more caution should be utilized with commas.  You may also want to reconsider the arrangement of headings.  The entire article is a biography, so I don’t see any reason to designate that as a first-level heading.
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 

It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 

It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars etc.: 

It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 

Overall:
Pass/Fail: 
I am placing the article on hold in the expectation that the problems mentioned above can be cleaned up. jackturner3 (talk) 15:21, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
Addressed the concerns. Hopefully to your satisfaction. Regards, Deacon of Pndapetzim (Talk) 01:12, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

In the second paragraph of the section #Bishop of Dunblane, it is said that Nicholas witnessed a number of royal acts, the last one on 8 February 1319. However, the last paragraph of the same section says that his last appearance on an act took place one year earlier, on 8 February 1318. It may just be a typo, but I cannot check the references. (@Deacon of Pndapetzim: since you brought the article to GA status, I suppose you'd be the person to ask.) – Swa cwæð Ælfgar (talk) 22:17, 12 October 2018 (UTC)

I checked the ODNB and it appears to be a typo. I have made the correction. – Swa cwæð Ælfgar (talk) 09:59, 24 November 2018 (UTC)