# Talk:Brazilian monitor Pará

This review is transcluded from Talk:Brazilian monitor Pará/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Skinny87 (talk) 07:51, 11 October 2010 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose):  b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): 

It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 
'The monitor had to be beached after passing the fortress to prevent her from sinking.' - What damage was inflicted to her to require this?
Not specified. Tamandare took over 120 hits so I expect that it was damage from the Paraguayan guns.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 18:55, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 

It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 

Overall:
Pass/Fail: 

I've got a single question for you to answer, and then I can pass this baby. Skinny87 (talk) 07:51, 11 October 2010 (UTC)