# Talk:Labashi-Marduk

This review is transcluded from Talk:Labashi-Marduk/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Iazyges (talk · contribs) 19:08, 25 August 2021 (UTC)


### Criteria
No DAB links Y
No dead links Y
No missing citations Y


### Discussion
### Prose Suggestions
Please note that almost all of these are suggestions, and can be implemented or ignored at your discretion. Any changes I deem necessary for the article to pass GA standards I will bold.


#### Lede
with the latest evidence of Neriglissar being alive being from April 556 BC suggest with the last evidence of Neriglissar's life dating in April 556 BC
Done. Ichthyovenator (talk) 22:09, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
could have been a son of Neriglissar by another wife and thus entirely unconnected to the Babylonian ruling dynasty. suggest
Looks like the suggestion disappeared here. Ichthyovenator (talk) 22:09, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Apologies, suggest Labashi-Marduk may have been wholly unconnected to the Babylonian ruling dynasty, as a result of being the son of another wife. -- Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 05:08, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
Changed. Ichthyovenator (talk) 10:03, 29 August 2021 (UTC)


#### Background
the empire's second and greatest king suggest replacing greatest with most powerful
Done. Ichthyovenator (talk) 22:09, 26 August 2021 (UTC)


#### Reign
and a contract from 16 April that same year at Uruk explain what Uruk is.
Explained that it was a city. Ichthyovenator (talk) 22:09, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
hardly surprising given that he had no time to complete any accomplishments would remove this; lack of accomplishments has rarely held back royalty from singing praises, and I think how short his reign covered the lack of inscriptions.
Yeah, done. Ichthyovenator (talk) 22:09, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
and at Sippar until at least 20 June. explain and link what Sippar is, perhaps and in the key city of Sippar until at least 20 June.
Went with your suggestion. Ichthyovenator (talk) 22:09, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Though Labashi-Marduk being the grandson of Nebuchadnezzar through his mother would have made him connected to the royal dynasty suggest though his mother would have connected him to the royal dynasty as the grandson of Nebuchadnezzar, Labashi-Marduk...
Done. Ichthyovenator (talk) 22:09, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
That is all of my suggestions. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 23:44, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
Passed. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 05:11, 28 August 2021 (UTC)