# Talk:Marge Simpson in: "Screaming Yellow Honkers"

I'd like to note here (just to prevent any concerns of "GA corruption") that I asked Juliancolton to provide an honest, unbiased and fair GA review of the episode over IRC. Seeing as how he recently reviewed another GAC worked on by Ctjf83 and I, I'd like to clarify this matter to avoid suspicion. And if, in the future, I do ever review any of his GACs (even though I don't really review GACs) that it will be a fair and unbiased one. I've asked Julian to kindly agree to this by signing. Cheers, Qst (talk) 17:52, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

Yes, I'll be providing a review shortly. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 17:53, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Marge Simpson in: "Screaming Yellow Honkers"/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Good work overall. A couple minor comments:
In the final paragraph of the "Plot" section, some uses of "Rhinoceros" are capitalized, while others aren't. Also, a link to Rhinoceros would be nice.
Convert the title of ref #6 to title or sentence case.
On-hold for now. Cheers, –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 18:02, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

All done. Qst (talk) 19:09, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Marge Simpson in: "Screaming Yellow Honkers". Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.ifmagazine.com/feature.asp?article=2288
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 19:19, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

Hello, DangerousJXD. I see you reverted one of my edits to re-match the article title. I thought that MOS:DOUBLE/MOS:SINGLE would apply because I thought a single quotation mark looks good for an opening sentence. However, the part said it applies to quotations, especially quotations within quotations. Does it apply to titles using quotation marks? --George Ho (talk) 21:56, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

George Ho, the guideline doesn't detail how this exact situation should be handled and that's probably something that should be rectified. I feel that the guideline as is isn't particularly relevant here. The examples given at MOS:SINGLE pertain to quotations attributed to individuals, whereas the usage of quotation marks here is just quoting the title of the episode, which is obviously standard per MOS:ITAL. MOS:SINGLE could easily be expanded to include information on this exact scenario, and it probably should, considering that this isn't incredibly rare; other instances of this include The Old Man and the "C" Student, Bart Gets an "F", and Bart's Dog Gets an "F", and those are just other episodes of The Simpsons. Those articles all use the method I prefer; keeping it consistent is also important. In regards to why I feel using your preferred method is inappropriate, I feel it's just common sense. If the title of an episode includes some quotation marks, they should be treated as letters, meaning they shouldn't be modified as modifying them is essentially modifying the title of the episode. More significant examples of this include American Dad! and Jeopardy!, where 'American Dad' and 'Jeopardy' are clear cut typos. I will note that I roll over extremely easily when it comes to matters in which I don't have exceptionally strong opinions on, which is virtually everything I do here, so you should keep that in mind. —DangerousJXD (talk) 00:14, 5 March 2017 (UTC)