# Talk:Mauritania at the 2000 Summer Olympics

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Mauritania at the 2000 Summer Olympics. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20001109071400/http://www.olympics.com/eng/ to http://www.la84foundation.org/6oic/OfficialReports/2000/2000v1.pdf
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.la84foundation.org/6oic/OfficialReports/2000/2000v2.pdf
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927222411/http://www.la84foundation.org/6oic/OfficialReports/2000/Results.pdf to http://www.la84foundation.org/6oic/OfficialReports/2000/Results.pdf
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150705032224/http://www.olympic.org/ to http://www.olympic.org/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:58, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Mauritania at the 2000 Summer Olympics/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: MWright96 (talk · contribs) 06:59, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
Going to review this article. MWright96 (talk) 06:59, 29 November 2018 (UTC)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose):  b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): 

It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 

It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 

It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 

It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 

Overall:
Pass/Fail: 


### Infobox
The number of athletes sent by Mauritania should be included in the infobox


### Background
"The Comité National Olympique et Sportif Mauritanien (The National Olympic Committee (NOC) of Mauritania) was recognized" - recognised


### Athletics
The word "Meters" should be spelt as "metres" in this instance
Maybe include the medal results for the women's 100 m like with the men's 1500 m
"and was drawn into the third heat" - changed the text in bold to assigned to for some variety
"and the bronze medal was taken by Kenyan Bernard Lagat." - by fellow Kenyan Bernard Lagat. or something similar
Maybe add the "scope=col" field to the data table for improved accessibility per MOS:DTT
That is all from my side. Nothing major needs action taken to get this to GA class. MWright96 (talk) 07:26, 29 November 2018 (UTC)

All taken care of, copied in the information about the 100m, though complicated, from another of my GAs. Courcelles (talk) 21:27, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
MWright96  Forgot to ping. Courcelles (talk) 21:27, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
@Courcelles: Promoted to GA class. MWright96 (talk) 07:32, 30 November 2018 (UTC)