# Talk:Jyles Coggins

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Jyles Coggins. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121003153354/http://www.newsobserver.com/2011/08/27/1439507/former-raleigh-mayor-coggins-dies.html to http://www.newsobserver.com/2011/08/27/1439507/former-raleigh-mayor-coggins-dies.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:20, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

[1]
"Nicks on Coggins" (PDF). Technician. Vol. 52, no. 10. September 20, 1971. p. 2.
[2]
-Indy beetle (talk) 04:19, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

Updated to B class and Mid Importance from a WikiProject North Carolina perspective.  The Bio Project should look at this.
User:G._Moore talk 15:13, 10 December 2019 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Jyles Coggins/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: G. Moore (talk · contribs) 15:33, 10 December 2019 (UTC)


### NC Project Review
From a WikiProject North Carolina perspective, this is a good article.  It contains inline referencing, appropriate number of images and tables, right amount of links, and is well written.  I looked for disambiguations, copyright, external links problems and found none.
User:G._Moore talk 15:33, 10 December 2019 (UTC)