# Talk:Charles Thom

This review is transcluded from Talk:Charles Thom/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Chiswick Chap (talk · contribs) 14:01, 25 November 2012 (UTC)

I think I've dealt with all of your excellent suggestions except one. Although Raper implies that Thom was the one who correctly identified the fungus, Mann 2004 suggests that it was more of a collaboration between Raistrick and Thom. It's difficult/impossible to know if Raper was inadvertently trying to paint his mentor in a better light, so I think the text is ok as is. Besides, based on what we know about Thom, I don't think he would mind :) (p.s. I think Aspidium is now Tectaria) Sasata (talk) 18:53, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
Super. I think we're ready to go...
Thanks very much! Sasata (talk) 19:16, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
I enjoyed doing it. Chiswick Chap (talk) 19:31, 26 November 2012 (UTC)