# Talk:Doedicurus

This review is transcluded from Talk:Doedicurus/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Hog Farm (talk · contribs) 22:25, 9 June 2020 (UTC)


### Criteria
1. Prose  On hold
2. Verifiability  On hold
3. Depth of Coverage  Pass
4. Neutral  Pass
5. Stable  Pass
6. Illustrations  Pass
7. Miscellaneous  Pass


### Comments
1. 

Link carapace in the lead, as well as the first mention in the prose.  It's not that common of a term, at least for readers without a robust biology background (currently linked at the second point in the prose)
done   User:Dunkleosteus77 |push to talk  20:36, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Link Smilodon at the first instance, rather than the second
done   User:Dunkleosteus77 |push to talk  20:36, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Camels is a duplink
fixed   User:Dunkleosteus77 |push to talk  20:36, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
2.

Note a should probably have a citation directly attached to it, as it's making a statement that an assumption is incorrect.  Even if it's from the same source as where the information in the sentence the note accompanies comes from, it should have a citation to make it clear where the information is coming from.
done   User:Dunkleosteus77 |push to talk  20:36, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Spot check on the refs should all checked instances supported by the reference and all linked refs tests working.
3. 
4.
5.
6.

Image licensing looks good.  Consider adding alt text, but that's not a GA requirement
7.
Placing on hold, just a little tightening up to do here.  Good work. Hog Farm (talk) 18:27, 11 June 2020 (UTC)