# Talk:Great World MRT station

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Great World MRT Station. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120908133557/http://app.mot.gov.sg/News_Centre/Latest_News/NewsID/1025BFFF26792831/Speech_by_Mr_Lui_Tuck_Yew_Minister_for_Transport_at_the_Inspection_of_Downtown_Line_1_Station_and_A.aspx to http://app.mot.gov.sg/News_Centre/Latest_News/NewsID/1025BFFF26792831/Speech_by_Mr_Lui_Tuck_Yew_Minister_for_Transport_at_the_Inspection_of_Downtown_Line_1_Station_and_A.aspx
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:52, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Aljunied MRT Station which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RMCD bot 09:33, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Great World MRT station/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: HoHo3143 (talk · contribs) 03:21, 9 January 2023 (UTC)

Hello! I will be the reviewer for this article. Once I have made a recommendation, please respond with {tick|20} (Y) and a comment to signify that you have made this change, or {bang|20} ( ) to signify a comment or remark. I will aim to complete the review quickly, and, if it hasn't been done automatically, I ask you to subscribe to this page so you receive notifications when a new comment is posted (I have also done the same). Once I have completed the review, to pay back the work that I have done, I'd request that you complete a review of one of my GANs (if you complete one of mine I can do another of yours (keep continuing)). This could be one of the following articles:

Caulfield railway station
Malvern railway station
Armadale railway station
Toorak railway station
Hawksburn railway station
Darling railway station
East Malvern railway station
Gardiner railway station
Glen Iris railway station
Thank you, and I look forward to completing this review. HoHo3143 (talk) 3:21, 9 January 2023 (UTC)


### Comments
Images should have ALT text. HoHo3143 (talk) 3:31, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
You should add more images to the history and description sections. It would "fill up" the article a bit more. HoHo3143 (talk) 3:35, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
Y Done. Added images ZKang123 (talk) 03:52, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
I think the description area is a bit short. Some of the other MRT station articles that you have successfully nominated have more information on the design of the station. This is also the same for the lead section. I'd like to see both of these sections expanded please. HoHo3143 (talk) 3:57, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
  Not all the time does every station have proper documentation of the designs of stations... The LTA (our transport agency) is pretty tight-lipped about this... ZKang123 (talk) 04:03, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
Ok that's fair- I would like to see further expansion on the lead section. HoHo3143 (talk) 04:09, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
Expanded a little more. ZKang123 (talk) 04:16, 9 January 2023 (UTC)


### Final comments
Whilst the description section is a bit short, I understand why information is limited. The history section is a good length and contains a good amount of interesting, important information. I'll be passing the article shortly. Once I have passed the article, I'd request that you repay the favour by reviewing one of my GAN listed above. HoHo3143 (talk) 4:19, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
I have now passed the article—congratulations! Now that I have passed the article, I'd request that you repay the favour by reviewing one of my GAN listed above. HoHo3143 (talk) 4:32, 9 January 2023 (UTC)