# Talk:Loch Arkaig treasure

The pope in question was dear old Benedict XIV. Any reason not to identify him? --Wetman 19:30, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

1. The first paragraph reads "said still to be hidden at Loch Arkaig in Lochaber." Said by whom? 2. I know Cumberland's repression was brutal, but perhaps we still need a reference for it? 3. The sentence on the embezzlement charge could do with a reference. DrKiernan 15:50, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

May have sorted this. I've referenced all three statements.--Docg 19:30, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

I have passed this article. My suggestions:

Break up the large lead into sections. It's a tad too lengthy.
Find some other external links. This is sort of optional, but it's a closer step to FA.
bibliomaniac15 05:10, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

I've split the lead. There really are no more external links to cite. This article is about as developed as the limited verifiable information will allow - I doubt it is capable of making FA for that reason.--Docg 17:16, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Loch Arkaig treasure. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://archive.is/20120729190100/http://www.dsl.ac.uk/dsl/snda4frames.php?dtext=all&query=BARISDALE to http://www.dsl.ac.uk/dsl/snda4frames.php?dtext=all&query=BARISDALE
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:28, 4 January 2018 (UTC)