# Talk:Horizon (Star Trek: Enterprise)

Image:Horizon (ENT episode).jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:05, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Horizon (Star Trek: Enterprise)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Albacore (talk · contribs) 12:40, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

I will review the article shortly. Albacore (talk) 12:40, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
No DAB links, no dead links
What makes TrekWeb.com a reliable resource? Other than that I'm OK with the sources presented.
TrekWeb is one of the oldest ongoing Star Trek websites, having been created in 1996. Its founder and editor Steve Krutzler is used on occasion as a Star Trek subject expert, such as in a Time magazine article here. It is one of only four fan produced websites endorsed by the Official Star Trek website here. Miyagawa (talk) 14:03, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
Sounds good. Albacore (talk) 16:28, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
Critical response was mixed, and the episode received the lowest ratings for a first-run episode of the series so far, having been viewed by 3.36 million viewers. I think you can remove the "having been" and be no worse off. Does this include season one?
Changed as suggested. Season one received the highest ratings of any series of Enterprise. The series suffered from quite a drop off in ratings over the four years. Miyagawa (talk) 13:25, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
At the direction of Starfleet, the Enterprise makes a 30 light-year detour to a planet passing between two gas planets as the gravitational forces on the planet should cause heavy volcanic activity. too many planets, I would change "two gas planets" to "two gas giants" and maybe link.
Done. Miyagawa (talk) 13:25, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
Travis identifies that the device would explode if they try to remove it, and it is revealed that this follows the pattern of other attacks on cargo vessels nearby I don't understand this sentence.
Split into two and re-worded the second half. "Travis identifies that the device would explode if they try to remove it. It is revealed that other cargo vessels nearby had tracking devices placed on them before being attacked once more". Miyagawa (talk) 13:25, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
What relevance does the third paragraph bear on the plot?
Not a great deal, I've reduced it down to a single sentenced and merged it into the second paragraph. Miyagawa (talk) 13:25, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
Reference 2 uses European dating while all the others use American.
That isn't actually a European date - the 19 is actually the page. The two threes are the volume and the issue (both 3). The date is given as November, 2003. Miyagawa (talk) 13:25, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
I will re-look when these comments are responded to. Albacore (talk) 12:44, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
Pass. Albacore (talk) 16:28, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Horizon (Star Trek: Enterprise). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051128010802/http://trekweb.com/stories.php?aid=dT8NTLIQKWAOk to http://trekweb.com/stories.php?aid=dT8NTLIQKWAOk
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100208221447/http://trekweb.com/stories.php?aid=mQuZU%2FVHcFx1A to http://trekweb.com/stories.php?aid=mQuZU%2FVHcFx1A
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://trekweb.com/stories.php?aid=3N1V99JB9rl2o
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20040301174049/http://trekweb.com/stories.php?aid=h6F3JzdgNN6Qo to http://trekweb.com/stories.php?aid=h6F3JzdgNN6Qo
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120606100505/http://trekweb.com/stories.php?aid=3f4df56930d4e to http://trekweb.com/stories.php?aid=3f4df56930d4e
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:10, 5 April 2017 (UTC)