# Talk:Mario's Tennis

In Mario's Tennis, the princess was called "Princess Toadstool" in the North American version and "Peach-Hime" in the Japanese version.
--ZachKudrna18@yahoo.com

Hello, as part of a university class assignment, I would like to help try to expand this stub slightly in the next few days, I'm trying not to step on anyone's toes, thanks so much

I have recently added 2 new sections and greatly expanded one. Feel free to give it a read and give me any feedback  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adamwolski0 (talk • contribs) 06:40, 4 April 2013 (UTC) 

It is vandalism to call the princess, "Princess Peach" in this article. --ZachKudrna18@yahoo.com

What's with the reverting back six versions, while useful info has been added? If you want to remove such a large chunk of text, please explain why. Robin F. 21:43, 5 December 2005 (UTC)

Because that particular editor has been making many dubious edits, so most of them have been reverted. tregoweth 08:14, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
All these changes and nobody fixes the spelling of 'racquet' ???

1up feature on Mario Sports
1up Review
Nintendolife Review
Crave Online's trivial mention
Defunct Games Review
Mushroom Kingdom's transcript for the manual
I thought there would be more out there...but then again, I've only done a quick first search so far... Sergecross73 msg me  19:22, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

I'm an infrequent editor to Wikipedia (mostly through IP), so I'm not fully aware of the protocol for this, but one of the sources used in the article could be faulty. For the fact that the game had plans two-player function, it cites an article written in 2011. However, the information traces back to at least 2006, when it was posted on the StrategyWiki (a fansite for gaming walktrhoughs) with no source in sight. From there, it popped up on the Super Mario Wiki (a fansite for Mario-related media) in 2008, again with no source in sight. I've yet to find another source that can confirm this besides other fan sites, though they were edited after the StategyWiki's edit. Even if the information is valid, I don't think using a source from 2011 works when there are (unsourced) works that use the info as well. Reversinator (talk) 02:04, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

Unless you've got proof that Engadget got their info from those bad sources, there's no reason to connect the two. Engadget is considered a reliable source, especially regarding tech info... Sergecross73 msg me 02:15, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Mario's Tennis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130321032417/http://www.ugo.com/games/ten-lessons-from-virtual-boy-to-nintendo-3ds to http://www.ugo.com/games/ten-lessons-from-virtual-boy-to-nintendo-3ds
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:24, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Mario's Tennis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130513141039/http://www.1up.com/features/25-years-super-mario-sports?pager.offset=2 to http://www.1up.com/features/25-years-super-mario-sports?pager.offset=2
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:37, 17 January 2018 (UTC)