# Talk:Legally Blonde

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Coripiazza.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 02:24, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Please add to the list references that can be used for the film article.
Dale, Carol N. (2006). "The return of pink: Legally Blonde, third-wave feminism, and having it all". In Feriss, Susane; Young, Malory (eds.). Chick Flicks: Contemporary Women at the Movies. Routledge. pp. 23–46. ISBN 0435863428.
Radner, Hillary (2019). "Legally Blonde (2002): A Pink Girl in a blue  World?". Neo-Feminist Cinema: chick flick, and Consumer Culture. Routledge. ISBN 0415877733.

Even though the movie undoubtly has more cultural impact it is an adaption of the book which came first, so theoretically the title of the article should be "Legally Blonde (film)", no? Anothracountiges (talk) 20:19, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

Why is the revelation with the pool boy not in the plot summary? This seems to be an important point. I would like to add it.  Mab157 (talk) 06:33, 14 September 2024 (UTC)

Hey, there. According to WP:MOSFILM#Plot, we should also avoid minutiae like dialogue, scene-by-scene breakdowns, individual jokes, and technical detail. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 06:35, 14 September 2024 (UTC)