# Talk:Cyan Garamonde

I don't believe the name "Cayenne" is verifiable. The kana read "KAIEN". I'm changing it unless someone can prove that Cayenne was the intended Japanese name. Viltris 05:55, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
--Yoshitaka Amano's art book JAPAN (liscenced by Squaresoft, ISBN 4-87188-338-8) lists his name as Cayenne Garamonde.  I believe this is evidence enough that his Romanized name was intended to be Cayenne, so I'm changing it back. 71.110.172.13 09:05, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

And that book is in English? Somehow I doubt that, but the last thing I want is an edit war based on the Japanese name.Viltris 22:35, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
It's an art book.  There's not a lot of text in it.  But there are names in it written in Roman letters and some English, more than in Amano's DAWN (which doesn't have Roman names in it...but those names are established in other places).  I wouldn't want an edit war over it either, but since you don't have the book and I do, it's easiest just to trust me on that point.  I don't think it's necessary to bring in a scan of the page :) 71.110.172.13 07:56, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

Analogous to Terra's article, who really cares about the character's zodiac? Should this be removed? --Bakabaka 17:40, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

His job class is Samurai? I always thought he was a Knight. Dread Lord CyberSkull ✎☠ 08:13, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

      -It's arguable that Cyan is a Samurai, because he uses katanas, and Cleave is basically the same thing as !Fdraw, the final skill learned by the Samurai job in Final Fantasy V. 
      69.255.21.213 01:41, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Cyan Garamonde/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: Kung Fu Man (talk · contribs) 21:46, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: Pokelego999 (talk · contribs) 20:10, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

Will try to get to this as soon as possible. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 20:10, 17 April 2024 (UTC)


### Six GA Criteria
1. Article is well-written. Very minimal mistakes if any at all.
2. No OR, all info is cited in the article.
3. Coverage is broad in depth and focus. Shows multiple aspects of the character.
4. Article appears neutral, and does not appear to hold a significantly negative nor positive stance on the subject.
5. Article appears stable. Does not appear to have had any major vandalism occur.
6. Article uses one fair use image with proper rationale, and uses one music file with proper rationale.


### Lead
-Looks good


### Appearances
-Looks good


### Conception and design
-Looks good


### Critical Reception
-"The Phantom Train scene in particular drew response." specify what kind of response

Redid the wording to make it clearer.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 22:55, 18 April 2024 (UTC)


### Overall
Honestly very high quality article, not much I can say here. Fix that one thing and I'll happily pass it. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 21:24, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

Got that bit fixed, lemme know if anything else comes up!--Kung Fu Man (talk) 22:56, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Should be all. Happy to pass! Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 22:57, 18 April 2024 (UTC)