# Talk:Italian ironclad Principe di Carignano

This review is transcluded from Talk:Italian ironclad Principe di Carignano/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Zawed (talk · contribs) 04:17, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
I will review this one. Comments to follow. Zawed (talk) 04:17, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Lead

Repeated use of "...she was..."
Changed the one in the middle - see if that's better.
The link to Vacca in the lead is to a different individual with the same name. The name is a redlink later in the article.
Created a stub on the right guy, though it needs a fair bit of work.
"...;the leading squadron of the Italian fleet...": I'm struggling with the phrasing here as there is no context for how the squadron relates to the ship.
I figured it was clear that the ship was part of the leading squadron, since it previously says she was the first ship in the line.
Design/Infobox

Length is given as 72.98m in text, 72.89m in the infobox.
Good catch, .98 is correct.
Short/Long tons conversion missing in the infobox for normal displacement.
Unless I'm missing something, normal displacement is in the infobox.
The link to propulsion is referred to as plural in the infobox but ship only has one engine.
Fixed
Inconsistency in number of boilers.
Fixed
Service history

"...on June 27, in attempt to..." > "...on June 27, in an attempt to..."
Good catch
link Adriatic.
Done
Dupelinks: Austrian Navy, Affondatore, coastal defense ship, Pola, and turret ships are all linked twice.
Fixed
"...enter the harbor Vis..." > "...enter Vis' harbor..."?
Fixed
"They there thus..." > "They were thus..."
Sometimes I wonder why my fingers type what they do.
Later career

"Italia-classs" > "Italia-classes"?
Fixed
References

Can an OCLC number be found for Wilson?
Added.
Overall, this article reads well, is fully cited and neutral in tone, and has reasonable coverage of the subject. The tags on the images appear appropriate. I will check back on progress in a few days. Cheers. Zawed (talk) 04:53, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for another review, Zawed. Parsecboy (talk) 13:23, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Looks good, passing as a GA. Good work. Zawed (talk) 05:38, 3 March 2016 (UTC)