# Talk:Every Night (Hannah Diamond song)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Every Night (Hannah Diamond song)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: Skyshifter (talk · contribs) 13:02, 27 October 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: OlifanofmrTennant (talk · contribs) 03:35, 11 January 2025 (UTC) 
I'll take this 

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, spelling, and grammar):  b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): 

It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.
a (reference section):  b (inline citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):  d (copyvio and plagiarism): 

It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 

It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 

It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 

Overall:
Pass/Fail: 


### Lead
Add how it was diamonds first billboard chart entry.
Done


### Background
Nothing but the last line in the section seems relevent.
"It was written by A. G. Cook and Hannah Diamond, with Cook producing it" -> "It was written by A. G. Cook and Diamond. Cook additionally served as producer.
Added something similar


### Composition
Alot of quotes, anyway to reduce this?

Reduced a bit, though I'm afraid of losing too much of the quotes' original meanings if I paraphrase too much. I believe the current number of quotes is acceptable.


### Release and reception
Why is "The Forty-Five" reliable?
It was listed as reliable on WP:A/S following this discussion.


### Misc
Infobox image has proper rational and infobox.
No talk page messages since a passed DYK two months ago.
Earwig detects around 12% similarty.
Archive all sources probably just use IA bot
IABot request sent, though it appears that it is down right now.
Dates are inconsistently formatted
I don't know if this was pointed as a problem, though it should be fine with the {{Use dmy dates}} at the top.
Spot checked 8 refs and everything lined up
@OlifanofmrTennant: done! Skyshiftertalk 11:05, 11 January 2025 (UTC)