# Talk:I Hate Boys

I think the redirection could be removed since it contains sufficient and reliable sources and is within the rules established by Wikipedia. It's the same situation Slow Down Baby.*Fr@Πkl!nG* (talk) 00:22, 14 September 2010 (UTC)

Per WP:NSONGS and the consensus which was established [1] the song is not notable. Per WP:OTHERSTUFF using other things as an example isn't the best way to proceed an argument. Until the situation changes to form a new consensus the redirect will remain in place. A song with no charts and little coverage is not notable. -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1  | talk2me 00:51, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
I have proof this is a single in Australia. It is a digital only track and I can provide the itunes link and everything. It charted on the airplay chart, I can provide web links to prove it was released here from the Aussie labels website. Release history, Airplay chart peak, track listing, cover art if the track was to be un-redirected. User talk: Bill4kate
That's not the issue.... you appear not to have understood what makes a song notable. A song has to have coverage from 3rd party reliable sources and it needs to have charted. Just because a single was released, it doesn't automatically inherit or hvae a right to its own article. it would help if people actually read WP:NSONGS. -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 [talk] 21:24, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
Then why isn't it stated it was a single in the singles seciton of Bionic. Surely the fact it was clearly released here means it should get a mention. (Billy4kate (talk) 21:28, 1 January 2011 (UTC))
Bring that up at the album's page and/or be WP:BOLD and add it with your source(s). What sources do you have btw? -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 [talk] 21:37, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
The itunes Australia link to the digital singles page. Christinas official website stating her "hot new single i hate boys has just been released to radio". Various other online digital outlets with the 2-track release. Radio station articles. (Billy4kate (talk) 21:53, 1 January 2011 (UTC))