# Talk:Certificate of division

This review is transcluded from Talk:Certificate of division/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: GregJackP (talk · contribs) 14:39, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality: 
Good writing
B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists: 

Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. Has an appropriate reference section: 

B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary: 

C. No original research: 

Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects: 

B. Focused: 

Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias: 

Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc: 

Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content: 

B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions: 

Overall: The only item I would address (and which is not in the GA criteria) is a redlinked "For further information" in the  In Civil Cases section - it seems to me that this needs to be removed until the redlinked article is actually written.  I am a fan of redlinks in lists and other areas, but it seems to me that if we are putting a link for readers to get further info, then the article should already be present.  As is normally the case, you have done a very good job with this article.
Pass or Fail: