# Talk:Expedition Everest

The source given for the roller coaster not being the tallest mountain in Florida actually states exactly the opposite, calling it the "tallest peak in Florida." Common sense would seem to suggest that the source is completely wrong, given the height of Britton Hill. For reasons of V and NOR, especially given the "contrary to popular belief" and what appears to be an incorrect published source, a source for Britton Hill being higher is really needed here. Was this added after the GA review, or did this slip by? --Constantine (talk) 06:48, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

It looks like it slipped by during the GA review. I don't know how I didn't even catch that.-- Astros4477 (Talk) 14:50, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Expedition Everest. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120515182434/http://wdwnews.com/releases/2006/03/15/himalayan-village-an-architectural-wonder-that-welcomes-expedition-everest-adventurers/ to http://wdwnews.com/releases/2006/03/15/himalayan-village-an-architectural-wonder-that-welcomes-expedition-everest-adventurers/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:52, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

The claim has existed in this article since it's creation in 2005 and could make for an extreme case of citogenesis but... all I could find to back the claim that it is 199 feet tall is a publication from the Mickey Monitor in 2006. If anyone is able to find a source to this claim, it would be helpful. Thanks, Cowboygilbert -  (talk) ♥ 23:33, 8 March 2025 (UTC)