# Talk:HSwMS Oden

This review is transcluded from Talk:HSwMS Oden/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: Simongraham (talk · contribs) 15:34, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: Zawed (talk · contribs) 21:03, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
I will review this one, comments to follow in due course. Zawed (talk) 21:03, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Some comments to start:
Lead

Hyphenate "first class"
Added.
"The battleship was armed...": this should be just "ship" I think as Oden isn't a battleship?
Amended.
Design and development

The primary unit for displacement in the text is t but is l.t in the infobox
Changed in the text.
Inconsistency between some of the data in the infobox; some values in the infobox are pre-reconstruction while others are afterwards. I suggest adding a little disclaimer to the "General characteristics" heading, along the lines of "as built" or "as reconstructed" and then use the appropriate data
Good idea. Added "(as built)" and made consistent.
The two 8 mm (0.3 in) on the mast are not listed in the infobox
Added.
...thick. 49 mm: Rephrase so sentence doesn't start with a number
Reworded.
Construction and career

On 11 August 1898, the vessel led a division that...: suggest "On 11 August 1898, the vessel led a flotilla of ships that..."
Amended.
During September 1901, the ship ran aground and was damaged, returning for repairs.: do the sources say where the grounding took place and where she returned to?
Added contemporary source with more data.
On 20 February 1904, Oden...: suggest rephrasing this sentence to avoid the two instances of "in response to"
Reworded.
Urd had been acting as a target ship for the battleship: battleship? Ditto first sentence of next paragraph
Changed.
link Karlskrona on first mention
Added.
Other stuff

There are quite a few dupe links - all but one seem to be units of measurement, the exception is Ven in the construction and career section
Yes. All are now gone.
Image tag for the plan view OK, but suggest adding a US tag for the photograph in the infobox. The date for the after reconstruction photo is clearly wrong, and am not sure if author name is correct.
Added the PD tag for the infobox image and updated the license for the other.
AGF on sourcing. I get an Error 403 message for the Office of Naval Intelligence link.
Good spot. Amended link for the 1900 report.
That's it for me. Cheers, Zawed (talk) 10:53, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

@Zawed: Thank you for your thorough review. I believe all the changes requested have been done. simongraham (talk) 14:34, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Looks good. I am passing the article as GA as I believe that it meets the necessary criteria. Cheers, Zawed (talk) 11:12, 18 April 2024 (UTC)