# Talk:Mahamuni Buddha Temple

Image of the Mahamuni Buddha. Feel free to insert it in the article. PHG (talk) 10:55, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
used in the expanded article now.--Nvvchar (talk) 15:30, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Mahamuni Buddha Temple/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: S Masters (talk) 12:58, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose):  b (MoS): 

It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 

It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 

It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 
Article is stable.
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 

Overall:
Pass/Fail: 

Comments:

Some captions have full stops, while other do not. Ensure that this is consistent.
ALl should now have full stops.  Dr. Blofeld      White cat  11:54, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
"(First century AD is also mentioned)" - What does this mean?
Nvvchar has addressed this.  Dr. Blofeld      White cat  12:01, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
There are punctuation issues. Long sentences need proper punctuation.
I've reduced a lot of them and have merged some of the problematic short sentences into one. if you can still spot any problematic ones that I missed please be specific.  Dr. Blofeld      White cat  11:56, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
Numbers greater than nine should be written numerically.
Nvvchar has addressed this.  Dr. Blofeld      White cat  12:01, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
There are low-level grammar issues, e.g. "...Airavata  in Sanskrit language...", "...also mentioned as images of Hindu god Shiva...", etc.
I believe Nvvchar has addressed this.  Dr. Blofeld      White cat  12:01, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
"Now, it is part of the Mandalay city." - What does this mean?
Removed. I think he meant it was once outside the city but the city grew through urban sprawl.  Dr. Blofeld      White cat  11:32, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
"After the fall of the monarchy, under British rule folowing the annexation of Upper Burma in 1885, and to this day the deep veneration of the Mahamuni image has continued among pilgrims of the region; the Rakhine, Mon and Burmans constitute the main pilgrims." - There are major grammar issues with the construction of this sentence.
reworded considerably.  Dr. Blofeld      White cat  11:32, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
Measurements need to be converted, see WP:CONVERT.
Nvvchar has addressed this.  Dr. Blofeld      White cat  12:02, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
(" Book of Conditional Relations..." - Extra spacing before "Book".
I reworded that sentence anyway.  Dr. Blofeld      White cat  11:56, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
References are not complete, e.g. Schober.
The references are complete. Looking at featured articles like Ming Dynasty. It is appropriate so only list the author and book page in the notes and then list the book in the bibliography below. This is accepted and is actually the way it should be done.  Dr. Blofeld      White cat  10:01, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
Sorry, my fault. I somehow missed it on the bottom. It is fine as it is. -- S Masters (talk) 10:05, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
Summary: This article has the potential to become a Good Article. However, it has numerous issues (listed above) that need to be resolved first. I will allow up to seven days for these issues to be addressed, before making any further decision.
Hi. Thanks for your comments. Hopefully it can be improved in the comming week.  Dr. Blofeld      White cat  15:21, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

Except for two tags references have been fixed to all other tags marked by Dr Blofeld. Some addtional text and explanations have also been provided. Howefully it would be added tomarrow. --Nvvchar (talk) 02:34, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
OK, please let me know once all of the changes have been completed. Thanks. -- S Masters (talk) 10:48, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
Refs added. Should be OK now.  Dr. Blofeld      White cat  12:34, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
Final comments: Thank you all for your hard work in making this a better article. I am confident that it now meets all the criteria for a Good Article and I am happy to list it as such. -- S Masters (talk) 14:13, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Mahamuni Buddha Temple. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Replaced archive link http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:WJgdX39sTAcJ:www.asiaexplorers.com/myanmar/mahamyatmuni_paya.htm+Mahamuni+Buddha&cd=14&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=in with https://web.archive.org/web/20100105183901/http://www.asiaexplorers.com/myanmar/mahamyatmuni_paya.htm on http://www.asiaexplorers.com/myanmar/mahamyatmuni_paya.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:51, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

Just a quick remark about the bronze statues mentioned in the article “lining the courtyard” are not there anymore but behind glass in the “Bronze Museum” also on the premises. 
Regards, lime  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.160.24.114 (talk) 13:13, 23 December 2019 (UTC)