# Talk:HMS Solebay (1742)

This review is transcluded from Talk:HMS Solebay (1742)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk · contribs) 12:36, 21 June 2025 (UTC)
Reviewer: Parsecboy (talk · contribs) 20:07, 23 June 2025 (UTC)
I'll take this one. Parsecboy (talk) 20:07, 23 June 2025 (UTC)

There's a harv error (I assume Goodwin (2009) should be (2002)?)
Ooh, that's one way to find out that my harv error script isn't working anymore!
Can we get an OCLC or something for the United Service Magazine? And is there an article title?
Added both.
Check your footnote ordering - there are some reversed sets. For example, you've got a [10][15][13] - the easiest way to spot these is to search for reversed brackets (meaning, "][")
Corrected the two I spotted.
I'll say the same thing I told simongraham at Talk:HMS Manners (1915)/GA1 - don't assume that all readers will know the Royal Navy is British. Most readers will (especially on fairly obscure ships), but not all will
I won't die on this hill by any means, but personally believe having "Great Britain" in large text with a flag in the infobox is enough to remove any confusion. Royal Navy receives 88,000 monthly views compared to 206 for Royal Navy (disambiguation), which suggests to me at least that those searching for the term "Royal Navy" are connecting it with the correct one!
Image copyright tags check out
Just a few nitpicks - great work as usual! Parsecboy (talk) 11:04, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

@Parsecboy: Hi, thanks for taking a look at this. I've responded above. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 15:18, 26 June 2025 (UTC)
I'm not going to push too hard on the "British" thing either - I'm fine with your reasoning, and happy to promote the article. Parsecboy (talk) 19:42, 26 June 2025 (UTC)