# Talk:Mega Man (1995 video game)

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Mega Man (video game) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RMCD bot 10:46, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Mega Man (1995 video game)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: MWright96 (talk · contribs) 13:22, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
Reviewing this for the GAN October 2020 Backlog Drive. MWright96 (talk) 13:22, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose):  b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): 
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 

It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 

It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 

It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 

Overall:
Pass/Fail: 


### Lead
"fighting against the mad scientist Dr. Wily" - don't need to have two wikilinks together in succession
Fixed. GamerPro64 01:42, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
"While the game was praised for its graphics and sound being similar to the NES games" - repetition of "game(s)"
Changed to title. GamerPro64 01:42, 4 October 2020 (UTC)


### Gameplay
Wikilink Mega Man the character on the first instance
Done. GamerPro64 01:42, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
Shouldn't Nintendo Entertainment System be written in just the acroynms?
Sure. GamerPro64 01:42, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
Wikilink continues and lives to the relevant articles for those who do not know what they mean
Done. GamerPro64 01:42, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
Briefly explain who Dr. Cossack is to the uninformed
Explained. GamerPro64 01:42, 4 October 2020 (UTC)


### Reception
Both uses of the % symbol in the prose should be written as per cent per MOS:PERCENT
Done. GamerPro64 01:42, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
Consider adding the names of the GamePro and Mean Machines reviewers in the prose as they have in the sources
The GamePro name is a pseudonym so not sure what to say about that besides what I added. GamerPro64 01:42, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
Did Mean Machines give any review other than reward a 75% rating?
Added some more in that part. GamerPro64 17:04, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
"with complete copies going for $400." - the RetroGamer source says it is $200 not $400
Not sure how that happened. Fixed. GamerPro64 03:41, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
"Because of the game's North American exclusivity, copies of the game garner a high price point," - repetition of the word "game"
Changed. GamerPro64 03:41, 4 October 2020 (UTC)


### References
Reference 2's dates are written in the hexadecimal format rather than the month, day, and year format
Same issue for all the dates in Reference 6
Done for both. GamerPro64 01:42, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
Will put the review on hold to allow the nominator to address or query the points raised above. MWright96 (talk) 14:47, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

@MWright96: I responded to all your comments. GamerPro64 17:04, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
@GamerPro64: Now promoting to GA class. MWright96 (talk) 17:50, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

The version 21:56, 27 February 2025 was translated into the Chinese Wikipedia. --For Each element In group ... Next 18:31, 22 March 2025 (UTC)