# Talk:HMS Prince George (1895)

This review is transcluded from Talk:HMS Prince George (1895)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Rp0211 (talk · contribs) 20:25, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose):  b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): 
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 
Overall:
Pass/Fail: 


### Infobox
No issues


### Lead
No issues


### Design
No issues


### Operational history
No issues


### Footnotes
No issues


### References
No issues

After thoroughly reviewing this article, I have decided to pass it at this time. Congratulations and keep up the good work that you are doing for Wikipedia! Rp0211 (talk2me) 20:38, 24 June 2012 (UTC)