# Talk:Más Notícias

This review is transcluded from Talk:Más Notícias/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: Cathodography (talk · contribs) 00:36, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
Reviewer: Steelkamp (talk · contribs) 05:46, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
Hello. I aim to complete this review within the week. Steelkamp (talk) 05:46, 20 May 2025 (UTC)

Ok, so I have no comments for the rest of the article's prose. It's all good. All I have left to do is a source review. Steelkamp (talk) 09:43, 22 May 2025 (UTC)
I'm happy to pass the review now. Steelkamp (talk) 14:07, 24 May 2025 (UTC)


### Prose
Lead

"...is an oil painting by the Brazilian artist Rodolfo Amoedo in 1895." The last part of this sentence sounds wrong. How about "...is an oil painting created by the Brazilian artist Rodolfo Amoedo in 1895."
Done Cattos💭 19:49, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
"The painting is housed at the National Museum of Fine Arts...". How about mentioning the city where the museum is: "The painting is housed at the National Museum of Fine Arts in Rio de Janeiro...". The city can also be added to the infobox.
Done Cattos💭 19:49, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
...years before its debut." I assume that refers to the painting. How about stating that explicity: "...years before the painting's debut."
Done Cattos💭 19:49, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
Background

No comments.
Composition

No comments.
Analysis

No comments.
Reception and legacy

No comments.


### Sources
Can you give a rationale for what makes Nicolich 2019 a reliable source? It's the most used source. Who publishes it? It uses cite journal, but looks like just a webpage. Is 19&20 an actual journal?
Its about page describes itself as an "independent on-line journal". It is not user-generated, and I believe the webpage is an academic publication even though it's independent/web-hosted. Provided the individual article, it is authored by a subject-matter expert and includes proper citations. (According to Escavador, she has a masters in visual arts). Cattos💭 19:47, 22 May 2025 (UTC)
Thanks. Given that the author is a subject matter expert, I think the source is ok. Steelkamp (talk) 14:07, 24 May 2025 (UTC)
Sources spot-checked: Nicolich 2019,  Vieira 2012, Silva 2012. I had to use Google translate as I don't speak Portugese. I will have to assume good faith on the sources which are offline.


### Images
I encourage adding alt text to all images, although that's not required under the GA criteria. No other issues with the images though; they are all old enough to be out of copyright.