# Talk:Coat of arms of Singapore

Changed the text as Singapore has no crest and thus the usage of crest makes no sense.Knorrepoes 08:30, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

While technically incorrect in heraldic parlance, as you say, in this case the vernacular use of “crest” to mean an achievement of arms has official sanction, and apparently a long history.—Odysseus1479 (talk) 06:54, 30 August 2011 (UTC)

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Singaporean passport biom cover.jpg
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 22:44, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Singaporean passport biom cover.jpg
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:35, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

The image shown for the coat of arms includes penises for the lion and tiger, which isn't uncommon in heraldry. However, I have yet to see a version that includes them in real life (passports, gazettes, etc.) This leads me to believe the version displayed in this page is inaccurate. Abyssmanx (talk) 13:44, 10 November 2023 (UTC)