# Talk:Ickenham

Can Ickenham really be described as a town? It's a residential area with its own shopping area, but, compared with its neighbour, Uxbridge, it isn't in the same league! Peter Shearan (talk) 06:20, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

The description "a suburban area, centred on an old village" recently applied to another London suburb seems apt Motmit (talk) 09:29, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
I've edited the article to use the above phrase, which I believe far better represents the status of Ickenham. IckenhamMan (talk) 11:48, 4 February 2011 (UTC)IckenhamMan
The description states that Vyners Grammar School opened in 1969.  This is inaccurate.  I attended Vyners from 1960 until 1965.  I was in either the first or second year of the school. Jakking (talk) 05:10, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Ickenham/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Deryck C. 21:55, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
Very nice article, with most things in place. A GA pass should be easy with a few little additions


### Lead section
This is a good summary of the article, except that the last two sentences appear to contain material not present elsewhere in the article:

A great deal of residential development commenced in the village and it gradually became part of the London commuter belt. Ickenham expanded with the sale and development of much of the Swakeleys estate in 1922 and became part of what was later termed "Metro-land".
These two sentences will require their own citations.


### History
Very well written. I don't have access to the books (excuse for applying for a British Library reader pass, finally!), and the citations are accepted by good faith.


### Local government
London Borough of Hillingdon should be linked.
There should be information about which wards of Hillingdon Borough Council, and which MP constituencies cover Ickenham. Names of incumbents are not necessary.


### Education
Good enough. The following are not required for GA but may be useful for future improvements of the article: more description of the local library, and articles of the individual schools.


### Transport
I think there also needs to be some description about road transport into and within Ickenham.


### Landmarks and events
Nice!
This is the best good article nominee I've reviewed so far. Good job and keep working on it!

Thank you very much. I have made the changes you have suggested. How does it look now? Harrison49 (talk) 22:55, 29 April 2011 (UTC)


### Passed!
Done. Suggested future improvements:

Individual citations for statements in the lead section (usually reusing the same reference in from the body text that refers to the same information)
More description of the local library
Population decreased from 11,214 in 1971 to 9,933 in 2001. Will be interesting to see why.
(beyond this article) new articles for the schools in Ickenham
(maybe) list of notable people from Ickenham
--Deryck C. 23:21, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Ickenham. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110608193253/http://www.hillingdon.gov.uk/media/pdf/j/s/Listed_Buildings.pdf to http://www.hillingdon.gov.uk/media/pdf/j/s/Listed_Buildings.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:42, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Ickenham. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110526202713/http://www.nickhurd.com/constituency to http://www.nickhurd.com/constituency
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:45, 11 November 2017 (UTC)