# Talk:Chlemoutsi

This review is transcluded from Talk:Chlemoutsi/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Dr. Blofeld (talk · contribs) 21:29, 3 July 2014 (UTC)

Will review over the weekend.♦ Dr. Blofeld 21:29, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
Comment I copyedited per my copyediting disclaimer, down to Keep. These are my edits. Concerning: "Andravida, some 13 kilometres (8.1 mi) away, and the Principality's largest port and town, Glarentza (c. 5 kilometres (3.1 mi)).": avoid "))". Also: "some" and "c." suggest it's approximate, but "8.1" and "3.1" suggest it's not. - Dank (push to talk) 14:49, 5 July 2014 (UTC)

Finished copyediting. - Dank (push to talk) 21:13, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
When you're done here, I think it's good to go for an A-class nomination. - Dank (push to talk) 14:36, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
Lead and infobox
No coordinates?
Add convert template for 226 m
History
"13 km (about 8 mi) away, and the Principality's largest port and town, Glarentza (c. 5 km or 3 mi). " use Template:Convert.
A. Bon -who is he??
Outer ward
Add convert templates for 5 and 10 metres.
Keep
Why "apparently judged"?
@Cplakidas: Looks in good shape, just those very minor things and I'll pass it!♦ Dr. Blofeld 14:14, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

Thanks to both of you for your work! I made the required changes. Thanks to Dank for the thumbs up, and over to you dear Dr. Blofeld: other than technical issues and GA requirements, how do you rate it? You have more experience with articles on towns etc, so in your view, is anything lacking, should I add more detail/context/something else? Constantine   ✍  16:17, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
Well, you know what is available for it, but it certainly covers what is necessary to pass GA which I will do now. You might though add a bit to the lead on the architecture just so it covers the whole article though.♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:14, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality: 
B. MoS compliance: 
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources: 
B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary: 
C. No original research: 
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects: 
B. Focused: 
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias: 
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc: 
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales: 
B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions: 
Overall:
Pass or Fail: