# Talk:Brioni Agreement

This article says startlingly little about Croatia's participation. -Oreo Priest talk 03:40, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Brioni Agreement/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: QatarStarsLeague (talk · contribs) 18:55, 3 August 2013 (UTC)
Review will begin soon. QatarStarsLeague (talk) 18:55, 3 August 2013 (UTC)


### Lead and infobox
A pass here.


### Background
"...Croatia leaving Yugoslav federation because..." Should be "Croatia leaving the Yugoslav federation because..."
"The delegation consisted of foreign ministers of current, preceding and following EC presidencies.[1] The delegation members were Hans van den Broek (Netherlands), Jacques Poos (Luxembourg) and Gianni de Michelis (Italy)." From these two sentences, I extrapolate that van den Broek was the current EC president, Poos the former, and de Michelis the future. If so, why was de Michelis replaced with Pinheiro. If not, please alter the first sentence of the excerpt so that readers can identify which delegation member holds each given distinction. QatarStarsLeague (talk) 14:42, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

Amended both points. Indeed de Michelis was former presiding minister in June. Since the EC changed presidency on 1 July, Poos became "new former" presiding minister. Added a bit of clarification on the issue as well.--Tomobe03 (talk) 15:54, 6 August 2013 (UTC)


### Conference at Brijuni
Fine here.


### Aftermath
Excellent here.


### Conclusion
Once the few minor issues are resolved, the article will pass! Congratulations! QatarStarsLeague (talk) 14:42, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

Please refrain from removing sourced material, such behaviour may be interpreted as disruptive. Also, please refrain from "renaming" Croatia and Slovenia in the article as "SR" (Socialist Republic) - they were not called SRs for quite a long time before the agreement - more than half a year as a matter of fact, and were declared independent a couple of weeks before the agreement itself. Finally, I reverted name of the islands to the WP:COMMONNAME. Please do not modify it either, the name is not only common, but it is also the contemporary name. Cheers.--Tomobe03 (talk) 11:24, 30 April 2014 (UTC)

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Hans van den Broek.jpg
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:14, 15 November 2018 (UTC)

This German news broadcast: [26] of 7 June 1991, shortly before the agreement was reached, mentions that a possible compromise solution about the question who should control Yugoslavia's external borders was being discussed, namely that Slovenians should be in charge of the border crossings but that Slovenia would be obliged to pass on any customs revenue to the Yugoslav central authorities. Our article only mentions Slovenian control of the border and Slovenians probably would have resisted giving Belgrade any say in anything concerning revenues generated in Slovenia, which would mean that this compromise solution was not pursued in the final agreement, am I right? Then the only substantial concession the Slovenians made would have been to postpone the effective date of the declaration of independence for three months. Or was there more in terms of what the central government had wanted to achieve with their military intervention? In these three months, did they maintain any overall control in Slovenia and if so, in which fields? Proofreader (talk) 08:37, 9 September 2024 (UTC)