# Talk:Greece in the Eurovision Song Contest 2003

This review is transcluded from Talk:Greece in the Eurovision Song Contest 2003/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Amitchell125 (talk · contribs) 10:16, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

One of a pair? Happy to review this.


### Review
#### Lead section/infobox
Unlink Latvia (risk of MOS:OL as Riga is linked next to it)	
Ena tragoudi gia tin Evropi – is this Greek? If so, shouldn't the Greek text be included as well (as has been done elsewhere in the article)?
Amend (transl. A song for Europe) to (“ A song for Europe”)	
10 songs – if possible, sentences shouldn’t begin with a number (MOS:NUMNOTES)
Consider linking Athens; music video (linked below)
Introduce Mando
Amend Mando herself along with Terry Siganos to ‘Mando and Terry Siganos’


#### 2 Before Eurovision
Amend  (transl. Vote for the Greek Song) and  transl. A song for Europe (see above)	
Unlink Dafni Bokota (it is a duplicate link (MOS:REPEATLINK))	
Unlink Giorgos Katsaros (duplicate link)	Unbold line 5


#### 3 At Eurovision
Unlink Never Let You Go (duplicate link); Ukraine; Norway (MOS:OL); Televoting (duplicate link)


#### 4 Notes and references
Ref 9 - (Ena tragoudi gia tin Evropi. Athens, Greece. 26 February 2003.)	cannot be verified
N not yet addressed
Ref 12 - the online title is not the same as the one in the article
Ref 13 - the online title is not the same as the one in the article, the ref seems to be identical to Ref 18
Ref 20 - O'Connor	 - the2007 edition is available online (at https://archive.org/details/eurovisionsongco0000ocon). Consider using this instead?
Ref 21 -	the online title is not the same as the one in the article
I don't think the titles of the web pages need to be checked for GA after all. Amitchell125 (talk) 14:52, 9 January 2022 (UTC)


### On hold
I'm putting the article on hold for a week until 16 January to allow time for the issues raised to be addressed. Regards, Amitchell125 (talk) 08:24, 8 January 2022 (UTC)

@Amitchell125: I've addressed most of your concerns, but can you check the ones related to presenting the Greek titles? I think I did what you asked, but just want to make sure. I will need to work a bit more on Ref 9. Refs 13 and 18 were combined as they were the same despite being different links. The titles for 12, 13, and 21 do appear to be correct already per the titles presented on the tabs. Grk1011 (talk) 17:51, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
@Grk1011: Only one point left, I'll try again to see if I can find the unverifiable citation. AM
I failed to find the source, can you obtain the information needed to verify the table? Amitchell125 (talk) 17:22, 9 January 2022 (UTC)


### Good enough to pass
The above point can be addressed at your convenience, as the rest of the article is absolutely fine. Passing now, congratulations. Amitchell125 (talk) 21:08, 9 January 2022 (UTC)

Will do. Thanks! Grk1011 (talk) 15:36, 10 January 2022 (UTC)