# Talk:Double Tenth incident

The image Image:Krait-crew.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here.  In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page.  Please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
That this article is linked to from the image description page.
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --05:12, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Double Tenth incident. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070612194708/http://infopedia.nlb.gov.sg/articles/SIP_111_2005-01-06.html to http://infopedia.nlb.gov.sg/articles/SIP_111_2005-01-06.html
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070420013449/http://www.mindef.gov.sg:80/imindef/about_us/history/world_war2/v07n10_history.html to http://www.mindef.gov.sg/imindef/about_us/history/world_war2/v07n10_history.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:37, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Double Tenth incident. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070612195811/http://infopedia.nlb.gov.sg/articles/SIP_874_2004-12-30.html to http://infopedia.nlb.gov.sg/articles/SIP_874_2004-12-30.html
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.mindef.gov.sg/imindef/about_us/history/world_war2/v07n10_history.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:39, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

"Jaywick, the brand name of a popular lavatory deodoriser"
Is this true?  I have never heard of such a thing. In the UK there are sanitary products from a company named Jeyes, and an air freshener called Airwick, but Jaywick as a brand is new to me; it also seems unlikely that a holiday village on the East Coast would be named after such a thing. Further, the entry for Jaywick states that the name goes back to at least the 15th century.
I suspect this is vandalism aimed at a community with an unfortunate reputation. Old Aylesburian (talk) 07:25, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

@Old Aylesburian Not too sure; Lynette Silver says in Deadly secrets: the Singapore raids, 1942-45 that Jaywick was named after a deodoriser called Jay Wick, but Will Davies in Secret and Special : The Untold Story of Z Special Unit in the Second World War posits that Jaywick wasn't named after the deodoriser, but rather the seaside town of Jaywick in Essex. Given that Silver has done more extensive research into Jaywick and Rimau, I'm more inclined to believe her opinion. Secret Special only provides a broad overview of Z Special Unit, anyways. Icepinner  04:24, 12 November 2025 (UTC)