# Talk:Ed Blake

This review is transcluded from Talk:Ed Blake/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: maclean (talk) 18:45, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

GA review (see Wikipedia:What is a good article?)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose):  b (MoS): 
Few copyedits made [1]
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 
Uses Baseball-Reference.com, The Sporting News, a local newspaper, retrosheet.org, and baseballinwartime.co.uk
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 

It follows the neutral point of view policy. 

It is stable. 

It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. 
No images used.
Overall:
Pass/Fail: 
Thanks :) Guess I'm getting better at writing if it was able to be passed without a hold. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 19:47, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Ed Blake. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100326011812/http://www.baseballinwartime.co.uk/player_biographies/blake_ed.htm to http://baseballinwartime.co.uk/player_biographies/blake_ed.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:32, 1 December 2017 (UTC)