# Talk:National Assembly Building of Slovenia

This review is transcluded from Talk:National Assembly Building of Slovenia/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Sainsf (talk · contribs) 09:57, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
Hi! Will review. Sainsf <^>Feel at home 09:57, 6 April 2016 (UTC)


### Lead
I would recommend keeping only one pronunciation in the lead so that it looks a bit less clumsy (see WP:MOSLEAD); the pronunciations can be stated in the infobox.
 Done
We do not keep citations in the lead unless we make significant claims. Not a strict rule, just felt I should mention it.
Cite number 1 (visitor numbers) has no other place in the text or infobox which it can be placed, cite number 2 now moved further down
 (Skupščina Republike Slovenije, It was opened Something wrong with the bracket?
 Done
People's Assembly Building of the Republic of Slovenia and Palace of the People's Assembly need not be in bold.
I think they do, as previous names for the place.
You should add the Parliament (Parlament) as an a.k.a. name in the first line.
 Done


### Construction
of 394 feet (120 m)  What is this? The height? The base diameter?
 Done clarified height
A new legislature building was thereafter...bronze figures framing its main portico. Source?
 Done
Twenty-seven master craftsmen As per WP:MOSNUM you should say "27", it would also appear less wordy.
 Done
It was completed in 1959. Source?
 Done
 At the 1991 independence of Slovenia Better say "After the independence of Slovenia in 1991".
 Done changed to "following"


### Design
the main façade faces Republic Square and is inlaid with Karst marble, with green Oplotnica granite below each window.  Does ref. 6 support this as well?
That's supported by refs 6/3/7
wall painting by the 20th century mural artist Slavko Pengov, extends across the length of the entrance hall and illustrates the history of Slovenians Does ref. 4 support this as well?
It can, but ref 8 is there to do that
the mural portrays events including You give the years for some events and not for others. Would be good to have consistency.
The events which took place within a year have theirs. The world wars don't need to have years on and the last two items are connected to WWII.
Following the 1991 independence of Slovenia No need to mention the year again, we know this already.
What's the harm?
Not adamant on this, just a suggestion of mine. Fine, keep it as you like. Sainsf <^>Feel at home 06:37, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
Link or explain amphitheater
 Done
Duplicate links: independence of Slovenia, Slovenian Parliament
 Done


### Incidents
Link granite, euro.
 Done
That should be it. These done, I would be glad to promote this. Cheers! Sainsf <^>Feel at home 06:34, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

Changes made as ticked above. Rcsprinter123   (interface) 19:36, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for the quick replies. I believe the article is ready for promotion now. Great job! Sainsf <^>Feel at home 06:39, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on National Assembly Building of Slovenia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160420041056/http://www.ukom.gov.si/si/promocija_slovenije/publikacije/sinfo_informativno_promocijska_revija/arhiv_2013/sinfo_januar_2013_praznujemo_20_let_slovenskega_parlamenta/ to http://www.ukom.gov.si/si/promocija_slovenije/publikacije/sinfo_informativno_promocijska_revija/arhiv_2013/sinfo_januar_2013_praznujemo_20_let_slovenskega_parlamenta/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:34, 30 September 2017 (UTC)