# Talk:J. T. White

This review is transcluded from Talk:J. T. White/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 16:27, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality: 

B. MoS compliance: 
Title in cite 1 should be capitalized to match other cites.
It is capitalized as per the source.  Are you sure that is not correct? Usually, unless the source is all caps, I use the same as the source.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR)  17:31, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
See Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style_(capital_letters)#Composition_titles. People, especially journalists, are getting very sloppy about capitalization in article titles. Keep it in mind for any other nominations you might have in progress, especially for FAC.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 17:39, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for the correction.  I shutter to think of how many refs I should go back and change.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR)  17:53, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
Yeah, but remember that it's not critical at GAR, but only definitely so at FAC.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 17:59, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources: 

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary: 

C. No original research: 

Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects: 

B. Focused: 

Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias: 

Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc: 

Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales: 

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions: 
You can't find a picture, even a fair-use one?
Fair use photograph cropped from 1947 Michigan team photograph has been added. Cbl62 (talk) 17:27, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
Overall:
Pass or Fail: