# Talk:Maryland Route 235

This review is transcluded from Talk:Maryland Route 235/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: –Fredddie™ 22:24, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose):  b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): 
All of the mentions of MD 235 are a bit monotonous, try mixing in a few other adjectives.
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 

It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 

It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 

It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 

Overall:
Pass/Fail: 
Switching up a few of the instances of MD 235 won't affect the status of this article. Good work, VC.–Fredddie™ 22:52, 23 December 2010 (UTC)