# Talk:John Doggett

The article says, "Mulder's son, William." What is the evidence that Mulder if the father? --Memenen 9 July 2005 11:11 (UTC)

Mulder referring to him as his son in the final episode.
See a few examples of evidence on the Baby William page.

Removed the line that states that Scully and Mulder were not trusting of each other in the beginnings of their partnership. From the pilot episode, with Mulder telling Scully about the abduction of his sister, one partner was often the only one the other trusted.Marikology 04:14, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
The entire Chris Carter interview (not just the answers mentioned in the article) in the References section is clearly fabricated and intended as a joke, and should therefore either NOT be used as a reference, or the article should more clearly indicate that the interview wasn't real.

The article states that his son's killer was found in the episode Release, but that fact is never revealed, nor is the identity of the killer. --Mperry (talk) 20:43, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

This is my own speculation, so I'll not add it to the article unless there's something out there that confirms it, but does anyone else think that Doggett is partially based on John Walsh?  Obviously being an FBI agent is quite different than hosting a crime-fighting tv show, but the back story and resulting motivation seem similar. On Thermonuclear War (talk) 20:27, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:John Doggett/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Sanguis Sanies (talk) 14:34, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
Greetings! I've previously reviewed Jeffrey Spender and as there is a rather large backlog under Film and Television I thought I'd help out and review some more.
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it well written?
A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct: 

B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation: 

Is it verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check?
A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline: 

B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose): 

C. It contains no original research: 

D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism: 

Is it broad in its coverage?
A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic: 

B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style): 

Is it neutral?
It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each: 

Is it stable?
It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute: 

Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content: 

B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions: 

Overall:
Pass or Fail: 


### Lead
Infobox: affiliated with: the X-files should probably lead to The X-Files rather than to x-file

 Done Sanguis Sanies (talk) 06:25, 27 November 2009 (UTC)


### Character arc
Should have much more CITEs, each claim should have the episode it was referenced in as a CITE.
Do we really need his service no.?

 Done Sanguis Sanies (talk) 06:25, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
 Done paragraph three and four both seem to repeat each other and should probably be merged into one (well referenced) paragraph.

 Not done. There are only three pharagraphs? --TIAYN (talk) 07:02, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
Really? I see four; para 1 starts with "Doggett served in the United States Marine Corps", para 2 starts with "In 1995, Doggett graduated", para 3 starts with "Initially, Scully and Doggett " and para 4 starts with "Doggett and his new partner," I think that three and four can still be merged.
Sorry, my fault!
 Done The final sentence should probably be dropped, it makes it sound as though he's disappeared, and (from memory) I Want to Believe makes no mention of him so isn't really a good source for that sentence.


### Conceptual history
 Done "More than a hundred actors" and should use <ref name=doggettjohn> to support that claim.
 Done <ref name=doggettjohn> doesn't support the claim that "Lou Diamond Phillips and Hart Bochner" both auditioned for the part. Can another CITE be found? If not the claim should be removed.
 Done "In an interview Chris Carter said" it's the first mention of Chris Carter in the article and should have his full name.
 Done "the show was shooting its pilot episode entitled L.A. Sheriff's Homicide" Was that the name of the show or the name of the pilot episode? If it was the name of the pilot what was the show called?
 Done "Carter had previously named" that sentence also needs a CITE.


### Reception
 Done I've added a {{who?}} tag to the claim "Some fans". The sentence also needs a CITE.
 Done "saying "everybody likes Robert Patrick and the character," " is a direct quote and needs a CITE.


### References
 Done As stated here it needs to be better clarified who was doing what. I would also suggest that the episodes be wiki-linked using the "episodelink =" parameter.
 Done CITE eight actually has two authors, using "first1=|last1=|first2=|last2=" will allow you to cite both.
 Done CITE 10 and 18 are {{dead link}}s. Can it be re-found on the new website or found via the internet archive?

I removed one of the dead links, i can't seem to the find the second. I've checked through all the references but can't seem to find the second one.
 Done Several CITEs have incomplete "accessdate=" parameters, they all name the day and month but not year.
 Done CITE 20 needs to be properly formatted.

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on John Doggett. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090820222339/http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com:80/latimes/access/64665615.html?dids=64665615:64665615&FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT&type=current&date=Nov+26%2C+2000&author=SUSAN+KING&pub=Los+Angeles+Times&edition=&startpage=1&desc=Cover+Story%3B+After+Mulder to http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/latimes/access/64665615.html?dids=64665615:64665615&FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT&type=current&date=Nov+26%2C+2000&author=SUSAN+KING&pub=Los+Angeles+Times&edition=&startpage=1&desc=Cover+Story%3B+After+Mulder
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 03:34, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on John Doggett. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080725015150/http://roswell.fortunecity.com/vortex/330/carterchat.html to http://roswell.fortunecity.com/vortex/330/carterchat.html
Corrected formatting/usage for http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/latimes/access/64665615.html?dids=64665615%3A64665615&FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS%3AFT&type=current&date=Nov%2026%2C%202000&author=SUSAN%20KING&pub=Los%20Angeles%20Times&edition=&startpage=1&desc=Cover%20Story%3B%20After%20Mulder
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:20, 5 May 2017 (UTC)