# Talk:New York State Route 428

GA review (see here for criteria)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose):  b (MoS): 
Change of verb tense in the intro (N terminus vs. S terminus). I can fix that.
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 
FYI - that NY state legislature link needs to be fixed. It doesn't go straight to the referenced law.
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 

It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars etc.: 

It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 

Overall:
Pass/Fail: 

Not much more that can be said about a former route. Congrats! —Rob (talk) 19:21, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

If you can make a link that does go to the exact point in the law, be my guest. There's no way to extract a link that goes directly to the law due to the frames and JavaScript used for the site. --TMF Let's Go Mets - Stats 19:24, 31 March 2008 (UTC)