# Talk:Noah Syndergaard

"Two hit two" be changed to "To hit two" -- spelling is incorrect
67.177.182.220 (talk) 02:59, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

 Done — Andy W. (talk · ctb) 07:18, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

Why is his team listed as the Mariners? 161.185.161.16 (talk) 19:35, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
The page was vandalized. I fixed it. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:58, 21 November 2018 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Noah Syndergaard/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Cherrell410 (talk · contribs) 01:29, 1 June 2022 (UTC)


### First Thoughts
Just glancing throughout the article, it looks like the article is well-sourced and has lots of information, including statistics, dates, and pictures. I'm already thinking that it will be a successful article.


### Immediate failures
Passes all immediate failure criteria, making it further reviewable.


### Criteria
I took all of the criteria listed from Wikipedia:Good article criteria.


#### Well Written
The prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience.
Spelling and grammar are correct, and it complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.


#### Verifiable with no original research
Contains a list of all references
All inline citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons.
It contains no original research.
It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism.


#### Broad in its coverage
It addresses the main aspects of the topic.
It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail.


#### Neutral
It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.


#### Stable
It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.


#### Illustrated
Media is tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.
Media is relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.


### Final Thoughts
I truly and deeply feel that this article meets all criteria and good article expectations, and deserves to be a good article.