# Talk:Losing My Religion

I keep adding these sources for folk rock and jangle pop: [https://books.google.com/books?id=QWBPAQAAQBAJ&pg=PA146&lpg=PA146&dq=Losing+My+Religion+-+alternative+folk&source=bl&ots=ZRgynxCrFW&sig=SXm1u05IUv0yDpM8ElYX2t8jOkE&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiy-raFk6vOAhVEYiYKHbeiAQY4ChDoAQgzMAc#v=onepage&q=Losing%20My%20Religion%20-%20alternative%20folk&f=false https://books.google.com/books?id=1-pH4i3jXvAC&pg=PA1344&lpg=PA1344&dq=Losing+My+Religion+jangle+pop&source=bl&ots=XJjNINuVNO&sig=9BkeQMtt337srnXmFQzqRw_BZbQ&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjHp4_VwK3OAhWG4iYKHVjFBgw4ChDoAQgbMAA#v=onepage&q=Losing%20M The User taking them off says that the song is not described as such in the ref, even though they are. I'm tired of having to put them back every day. No one but Synthwave is complaining about these references. I just need confirmation that these sources do indeed say said genres and are good to use.
---Dpm12 (7 Aug 2016, 11:58 PDT)

If I could get some responses soon, that would be helpful. --- Dpm12 (7 August 2016, 16:06 PDT)

In the video, there appears a woman pinned against a tree by arrows, with blue hair and who is shirtless and has no breasts... what is this a reference to? He/She makes a few other appearances in the video as well. Also, is that a real woman or just an effeminate man dressed as a woman?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.204.136.129 (talk) 04:50, 2 October 2008 (UTC) 

I changed the explanation from "being at the end of one's rope" to "flying off the handle", per an explanations I heard on the radio at the time of the song's popularity, and as backed up by this web site:  http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=losing+my+religion&defid=108482#108482 
--GreatAlfredini 03:16, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
The current explanation makes zero sense to me... Venicemenace 9/29/06

I concur. It should be "being at the end of one's rope". --Fantailfan 16:19, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
I meant "flying off the handle." Fantailfan 16:23, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

The article states, "Losing My Religion is probably the largest hit in rock history to have a mandolin as the main instrument," however an obvious counter-example is Rod Stewart's 1971 monster hit Maggie May, which went to #1 in both the US and the UK.  --Blainster 10:10, 11 September 2005 (UTC)

But the album "Out of Time" went to #1 in both the US and the UK charts, and LMR is the best known single from it. [1] You can see from the link that people have rather bought R.E.M. albums than singles. But the ultimate popularity is difficult to measure, both songs are classics. It is OK that you removed the sentence from the text. -Hapsiainen
I agree that these things are difficult to measure as you say.  That is why it is wise to avoid making any statement of superiority or ultimacy on Wikipedia unless it is easy to verify.  However a statement to the effect that LMR is one of only a few rock music hits to feature the mandolin would be quite acceptable if you wish. That would make the point without getting into a contest.  --Blainster 03:33, 12 September 2005 (UTC)

was the song banned, or the video? something tells me it was the video.

I'm pretty sure both were. However, I believe that the song was banned as a direct result of the video. I'll try to verify that. If this is the case, then I'll change the location of the statement to be in the video section since it applies more directly to the video than the song itself. Bsd987 03:58, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
Theres no legal mechanisms to ban either songs or music videos in Ireland, nor was there in 1991. There is a possibilty that the then-sole national television broadcaster (RTÉ, who were also the then-largest but nowhere near sole licenced radio broadcasters) refused to play it but this is highly unlikely also. --Kiand 21:35, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
According to R.E.M.'s biography on Rolling Stone magazine's website, the video was banned in 1991.
http://www.rollingstone.com/artists/rem/biography
What fact trumps which? The "No banning mechanism in place" fact or the "inclusion on RS's website" fact? My guess is that if a government wants to ban something but can't, it either does it anyway, or passes a new law, and then does it anyway. Failing those two, it does it anyway, since there's not much point in being a government if you can't do what you think you need to do. 24.77.132.253 (talk) 23:30, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
Mike Mills confirms here that the song "was banned in Ireland". - Dudesleeper /  Talk 03:15, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

Doesn't get around the fact that its impossible for it to have been banned, though. Ireland's totalitarian censorship laws of the time were about 70 years old and only covered printed texts and films - not television, not music, not the early days of the internet, not anything that wasn't envisioned in the early 1920s. Basically, the 'ban' didn't exist, whatever some other sources say - but this is the problem of Wikipedia, once two other sites have the same wrong info, it suddenly becomes verifiable 'truth'. --86.43.120.162 (talk) 20:45, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

I've changed the title on the infobox from "Shiny Happy People" to "Losing My Religion". All the evidence I can see (including the album cover for the single) lists the title as "Losing My Religion", and the fact that none of the three versions of the single include "Shiny Happy People" also leads me to believe it was just a mistake. If I'm wrong, feel free to change it back, though I'd like to see an explanation why (either here, or preferably on the article page), because it wouldn't be very intuitive. —LrdChaos 01:16, 2 April 2006 (UTC)

The reason is, I had copied the infobox from the "Shiny Happy People" infobox, changing it from the "old" (WikiAlbum-style) to the "new" style per WikiSingle. As with a couple of others I have updated I failed to change the title. I had just received the Out of Time Singles Collected and "fixed" the existing pages in too much of a hurry. Fantailfan 01:21, 2 April 2006 (UTC)

I have removed the sentenced "However it remains unclear if the song is a political or a personal expression by the band." from the first paragraph of "The song" section. As User:Wikipediatrix said when first removing it, "if it's unclear, then don't mention it." There's no provided indication that there's any meaning to be had from it; to say it's "unclear" about whether the "flying off the handle" bit is personal or political first assumes that the band meant the title to mean that phrase. There's no source for that, so it's just as possible (though perhaps less likely) that the title and phrase are meant more literally, and that the song is a statement about losing faith.

I see no particular reason for which a religious interpretation should be excluded. If so, what is the meaning of "Every whisper Of every waking hour I'm Choosing my confessions". Maybe even this expression has some alternative meaning, I do not know, since I am not native english, and probably there are native english persons who do not know about the other meaning of "losing  my religion". It seems that the lyrics are -deliberately or not- vague or ambiguous, or even a joke about the ambivalence of the expression "losing my religion". —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Popopp (talk • contribs) 11:23, 4 March 2007 (UTC).
On another note, User:Chairmanofall, please remember to assume good faith. Wikipediatrix's edit was neither stupid nor vandalism. just because the edit was to remove content that you added does not mean it was vandalism, and a perfectly reasonable explanation was provided in the edit summary. —LrdChaos (talk) 13:44, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
This song is one of the greatest annoyances in the history of heavy rotation radio transmissions, isn't it? I miss a top flop list for songs most people do NOT want to hear ever more...

What's the point of having entries for songs if there is no analysis of the music and lyrics?! User:201.74.132.169 forgot to sign.

Scholarly analysis from, and leading to, reliable sources is probably very welcome. MURGH disc. 23:53, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

While it is (my fine) image, I agree with removing it. It adds nothing to the article that the single US release album cover does not provide. --Fantailfan (talk) 14:29, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Why is "Billboard Hot 100" in italics?
It's supposed to be.
According to Billboard Hot 100 only the word "Billboard" goes in italics.
Sorry, read it wrong (for some reason I read it as all italics). WesleyDodds (talk)
I would have the "References" section after the "Notes" section. This probably means that there's a policy stating the contrary, but there, I said it.
There's no explicit guideline, but I prefer to have the References before the Notes, primarily because the notes used abbreviated citations of the material listed in the References section.
OK, that's fine. Dihydrogen Monoxide (party) 06:01, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
"said there were "long, drawn-out discussions" about releasing such an "unconventional track" as the single until the label agreed - ref for this quote?
The reference at the end of the paragraph references everything.
Is it possible to duplicate this reference (at least for the quotes)? Dihydrogen Monoxide (party) 06:01, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
It's not really necessary, since the reference is referencing the entire paragraph. WesleyDodds (talk) 06:09, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
""The record crosses the boundaries of being just an alternative record"" - same again. If ref 8 covers all this, duplicate it for the quotes.
Per above.
See above. Dihydrogen Monoxide (party) 06:01, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
In the "Track listing" section, use something like {{note}} etc (the example I'm thinking of is on [[Powderfinger discography, ironically) so you can jump between the endnote and the track listing (does this make sense?)
No, sorry, I don't get it.
I'll do it. Dihydrogen Monoxide (party) 06:01, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
Ref for the certification?
I'll just remove it until I can verify it.
The 2nd EL has potential copyright issues (or so the anti-YouTube cabal tells me).
The record label put the video up on YouTube. WesleyDodds (talk) 05:55, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
I don't think [2] is the record label. Dihydrogen Monoxide (party) 06:01, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
Sorry, I thought it was one of the videos put up by the label and/or the official R.E.M. site (of which there are a few, although apparently not for this song). WesleyDodds (talk) 06:09, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
Leave me a note when done. Dihydrogen Monoxide (party) 05:35, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Passed. Don't worry about the misunderstandings, we all make them :) Dihydrogen Monoxide (party) 06:13, 24 January 2008 (UTC)


### Furthermore
Sorry for being late. I was out in Wiki because we had a congress. Anyway, here are my suggestions. If suggestions were addressed before, please crash it out, and most of all, please feel free to object.

Do not italicize the entire "Billboard Hot 100"; just "Billboard".
poularity to popularity
The lead do not summarizes all what is written in the main artivle.
Link one "riff"
Avoid use of contracted word such as couldn’t and wasn’t; spell it out.
Any link to orchestral strings?
The phrase "losing my religion" is an expression from the southern region of the United States, and means losing one's temper or civility, or "being at the end of one's rope." Need citation.
Can you put magazine after Q so that it will not be misleading?
"forthcoming album Out of Time?" I thought it was released in 1991?
"The band's record label Warner Bros. was wary about the group's choice of the song as the album's first single. Steven Baker, who was vice president of product management at Warner Bros. at the time, said there were "long, drawn-out discussions" about releasing such an "unconventional track" as the single until the label agreed. While R.E.M. declined to tour to promote Out of Time, the band visited radio stations, gave numerous press interviews, and made appearances on MTV to promote the record. Meanwhile Warner Bros. worked to established the single at campus, modern rock, and album-oriented rock radio stations before promoting it to American Top 40 stations, where it became a success." Needs direct citation.
Meanwhile,
Worked to establish.
"to promote the record" Needs rewording; already mentioned "to promote Out of Time" earlier.
Again the italicization of Hot 100.
Link the first occurrence of Rolling Stone and delink the other.
The success of "Losing My Religion" and Out of Time broadened R.E.M.'s audience beyond its original college radio-based fanbase. This is not directly sourced. Please provide so that the lead will not POVic.
Remove "a number of" because "plaudits" is already giving its meaning.
Village Voice's
"Losing My Religion" alone earned several nominations, including Record of the Year and Song of the Year. Remove? Leave what they won.
Remove "list of the" because you mentioned "listed".
notably and prominently I think is POV.
What lighting?
Were heavily
Remove "the story of"
Remove the nomination thing; leave what they won for it will be obvious to say their video was nominated.
Remove "also".
Make sure you use en dash for the track listings and make it into two column.
Any succession box for the mainstream thing? It would be bias since you added modern rock.
Remove the table for the certification for it is futile. Instead, add it to the prose; in the reception section, following the chart thing. Also, fill up the certification entry in the infobox.
Enclose the date of publication (written as date) in the reference tag in parenthesis.
Too many samples for the video in the external links; one if fine. You can add link to the lyrics, instead.
Thats all. Thank you. --BritandBeyonce (talk) 07:30, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

maybe someone should mention how this song was in the FOX television series "GLEE"  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.188.188.90 (talk) 02:13, 28 July 2011 (UTC) 

An individual GA reassessment page has been opened. Your opinions can be added there. The discussion is below.

This discussion is transcluded from Talk:Losing My Religion/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.

The current state of the article is not up to GA standards, specifically the referencing. There are currently two cleanup tags on the page, and some of the references are unreliable (some are references to Wikipedia and YouTube). I feel like this should no longer be a GA unless it receives a decent amount of work to bring it up to standards. What do you think? Anarchyte (work | talk) 13:02, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

I've taken care of the unplugged section's referencing (took out the actual auditorium, since it wasn't covered by the source), and removed the award sentence since it duplicated the same information from Critical reception. That leaves the Cover versions section, which has the YouTube references (I didn't see any to Wikipedia articles) and also some bare URLs (though those are easily fixed by running one of the tools that fleshes them out). If you really think the unreferenced entries on the list are enough of a problem that the article should be delisted, then the simple solution is to remove all unsourced or inadequately sourced cover versions (or at least comment them out). The question becomes then whether there are any other ways in which the article fails to meet the GA criteria, and for that, you'd need to basically do a complete GA review here—and as you've opened this as an individual reassessment, that's the job you signed up for. BlueMoonset (talk) 20:03, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
@BlueMoonset: Okay, I've cleaned up everything else. Should be right now. Cheers for the help. Anarchyte (work | talk) 01:08, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

Is there a reason why cassette tapes aren't noted among the formats available (only CD, 7 inch, 12 inch)?  I still have my "Losing My Religion / Rotary Eleven" on cassette.  As with the other formats, this tape was a "cassette single" release of just these two songs.  The cassettes jacket has the same artwork as the disk singles.
Tesseract501 (talk) 04:17, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

@Tesseract501: None at all. Cassingle is a perfectly legit format. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 16:22, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
@Koavf: Thanks.  Most of my cassette s are soooo old (some back to the mid-70s, stored with my old 8-tracks) they may snap if I tried to play them.  So, a legitimate but brittle format!  Some haven't aged well, even in storage; but, neither have I). Ha!  Tesseract501 (talk) 03:19, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Losing My Religion. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.robertchristgau.com/xg/pnj/pjres91.php
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120214035830/http://blog.vh1.com/2007-12-13/top-100-songs-of-the-90s to http://blog.vh1.com/2007-12-13/top-100-songs-of-the-90s/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:10, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Losing My Religion. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101011195037/http://blog.zap2it.com/frominsidethebox/2010/10/glee-cory-monteith-talks-losing-my-religion.html to http://blog.zap2it.com/frominsidethebox/2010/10/glee-cory-monteith-talks-losing-my-religion.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:23, 14 December 2017 (UTC)