# Talk:HMS Pelorus (J291)

The page currently lists 12 October, 1994, but I have found many references to 12 November, 1994, and even one to 19 November, 1994. None of these pages qualifies as a first hand source, but the date in the article is also uncited. I'm going to go ahead and change it to 12 November. Warrickball (talk) 11:34, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:HMS Pelorus (J291)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Peacemaker67 (talk · contribs) 02:04, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
 On hold This article is in good shape, it is stable, images are appropriately licensed, prose is good, sources are all there and apparently reliable, structure makes sense and there are no obvious issues with neutrality or plagiarisation. There are just a few minor differences between the values in the body and the values in the infobox, which appear to be caused by difference in conversion template values. For example, the standard displacement conversion in the body says 1,050, but the infobox says 1,047. There are similar discrepancies with the conversions of overall length, beam and draught. Also, there is 40-millimeter but also metres, so they should just be consistent, British English is probably preferred for an ex-Brit warship. That's about all I could fault against the GA criteria. Great job as always on an interesting little warship. I'm just placing it on hold for those minor points to be addressed. Cheers, Peacemaker67  (click to talk to me) 02:21, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

Yeah, just rounding errors. All fixed. Thanks for getting to this so quickly.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 05:07, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
 Pass No prob. Peacemaker67  (click to talk to me) 05:21, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on HMS Pelorus (J291). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://archive.is/20130505182517/http://www.sahra.org.za/content/shipwreckid1512-fri-2013-03-08-1836 to http://www.sahra.org.za/content/shipwreckid1512-fri-2013-03-08-1836
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:10, 20 January 2018 (UTC)