# Talk:Jet Kiss

The aircraft once flew from Sand Point Naval Air Station (now Magnuson Park): [1]. Perhaps a better source could be found, and this incorporated in the article. - Brianhe (talk) 08:04, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

A Skyhawk fansite has some details about the two that were chosen for this piece. Trying to find some reliable sources to back this up, especially the "one of the earliest" claim. SounderBruce 03:05, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

The A-4 Skyhawk was an attack aircraft, not a fighter. It sounds silly to describe it as a fighter. --John (talk) 21:27, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

I'm not sure I'd be pedantic about that for several reasons. First, the readers of this article probably have no idea what an attack aircraft is, but a fighter is universally known. Second, the aircraft carried 20 mm cannon and AAMs and today might be called an F/A. Third, Fighter aircraft#Terminology describes how the terms are kind of arbitrary especially now considering aircraft like the F-117 deliberately misnamed. So, bottom line, no harm really in calling it a fighter. - Brianhe (talk) 22:42, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Jet Kiss. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160912013323/http://blog.seattletimes.nwsource.com/davidpostman/2008/04/17/dems_say_sound_transit_art_is_culturally_insensitive.html to http://blog.seattletimes.nwsource.com/davidpostman/2008/04/17/dems_say_sound_transit_art_is_culturally_insensitive.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:56, 25 November 2017 (UTC)