# Talk:Change UK

Since Change UK is now a de-facto non entity, does it even merit an article in Wikipedia? Hanoi Road (talk) 21:23, 17 December 2019 (UTC)

@Hanoi Road: Generally, Notability is not temporary. If you think you could make a good arguement that it has not received enough sustaining coverage over a sufficient period of time, then you are welcome to nominate the article for deletion. Cheers, –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 22:13, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
Fair enough.
I guess it's simply notable for being a failure that lasted five minutes, but that's enough to qualify, I suppose. Hanoi Road (talk) 23:35, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
@Hanoi Road: There's no need to be a WP:POV warrior. If you have an issue regarding Wikipedia policy on notability, take it to the WP:VILLAGEPUMP. Domeditrix (talk) 09:59, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
There's plenty of articles about defunct political parties in Wikipedia. So that's no reason to delete the article. Also, Change UK more than passed the threshold for notability due its heavy media coverage and the fact it had representation in the House of Commons.--Autospark (talk) 17:03, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
Oppose, party is a significant if small part of UK political history, as shown by the coverage. Jonpatterns (talk) 20:45, 24 December 2019 (UTC)
Oppose. The party had MPs and, thus, is definitely relevant. --Checco (talk) 21:01, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
Oppose: Party had MPs and significant media coverage so meets our notability guidelines. This is Paul (talk) 21:52, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
As a registered party at one significant period, it is of historic record, even if it currently is or was a 'non-entity' 86.22.43.187 (talk) 00:35, 28 April 2024 (UTC)

The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion:

Change UK Logo 2.png (discussion)
The Independent Group Logo.png (discussion)
Participate in the deletion discussions at the nomination pages linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:06, 23 January 2020 (UTC)