# Talk:Nord Stage

This review is transcluded from Talk:Nord Stage/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: GreatOrangePumpkin (talk · contribs) 09:19, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose):  b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): 
" of Stockholm, Sweden. " perhaps "in ..."?
 Done Changed to Stockholm in Sweden and wikilinked --Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  18:50, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
Footnotes should be placed behind commas in "Reception" :)
 Done Have done a few of these MOS fixes recently, and of course the last thing I did before the GA review would not have them. Anyway, fixed. :-) --Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  18:50, 20 August 2012 (UTC)

It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 

It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 

It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 

It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 

Overall: Aye. Good work! :) Regards.--Kürbis (✔) 17:43, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
Pass/Fail: