# Talk:Getty Conservation Institute

This review is transcluded from Talk:Getty Conservation Institute/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: CrowzRSA 20:31, 2 June 2011 (UTC)

Review

The article is well structured and covers pretty much everything it needs, is referenced, and does not go against  Wiki's neutral policy. There are no edit wars, as far as I am concerned. There were a few minor WP:MOS issues, but I have fixed those. I will now pass the article.
— Congratulations, CrowzRSA 21:45, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
Thank you for the review. Racepacket (talk) 22:36, 2 June 2011 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Getty Conservation Institute. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120803081352/http://www.inxitu.com:80/new/pdf/NASA%20invention%20of%20the%20year%20award%20v2.pdf to http://www.inxitu.com/new/pdf/NASA%20invention%20of%20the%20year%20award%20v2.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:04, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

Major project of (open source) software and service development ARCHES is missing... I just added few entries in WikiData about it, but as non-expert and non native-speaker I hope others can contribute it to the page that is already marked as Good quality class article (not to mess it up ;) --Zblace (talk) 07:46, 19 May 2021 (UTC)