# Talk:Namco Museum DS

This review is transcluded from Talk:Namco Museum DS/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: NegativeMP1 (talk · contribs) 03:09, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
Reviewer: Cukie Gherkin (talk · contribs) 17:29, 14 April 2025 (UTC)

I remember playing this a lot when I was younger - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 19:05, 14 April 2025 (UTC)

I'm not home right now, so I won't be able to get to the comments for a while. I'll try to do it later tonight. λ NegativeMP1 20:30, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
@Cukie Gherkin: I've addressed all of the below comments, so you should be good to continue now. λ NegativeMP1 23:35, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
Infobox

Inconsistent use of Bandai Namco vs. Namco Bandai
Fixed.
Lead
Images

Caption should lose "as it is presented"
Done.
Gameplay

Should clarify that the games are single-player
Weirdly enough I don't think any sources specifically says they were single player, but based on the fact Pac-Man VS. is the only game clarified to be multiplayer, I think it might be obvious?
As I recall, there's vertical and horizontal modes? Might be good to specify (I found a source on that here [1])
I though the "display settings" thing would make that clear, but done.
Release and reception

[2] [3] [4] [5] Some dev and promo info
Added many of these sources to the article.
Verifies the existence of a dual pack game: [6]
Added.
Recommend making an "intro" sentence for the third paragraph
Done.
[7] [8] Included these non-English sources in case you want to add them down the line.
Will add later on.
Also found some other sources: [9] and [10], the latter of which can be used to verify the differences in the PMVS port and the author's feelings on it
Added, although I didn't add his opinions directly to the reception, but rather as just a citation among the authors that liked the inclusion of Pac-Man Vs.
Spotcheck
Just have to do this. - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 19:05, 14 April 2025 (UTC)

[11] Checked; looks good
[12] Checked; looks solid
[13] Checked; looks choice
[14] Checked; looks tubular
Aight, passed. - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 14:09, 16 April 2025 (UTC)