# Talk:Milk (The 1975 song)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Milk (The 1975 song)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: K. Peake (talk · contribs) --K. Peake 20:57, 12 June 2021 (UTC)

Soon --K. Peake 20:57, 12 June 2021 (UTC)


### Infobox and lead
Infobox looks good!
"English band the 1975 originally" → "English band the 1975, originally"  Done
"It was written by" → "The song was written by"  Done
"The band produced" → "The 1975 produced"  Done
"the track served as" → "the song served as"  Done
"and is characterised by its extensive use of guitars. The track's lyrics" → "The song is characterised by its extensive use of guitars, while the lyrics" since the characterisation flows better when merged with this in a sentence  Done
"It has since become" → "The song has since become"  Done
"during a charity show" → "during a February 2019 charity show" for proper context  Done


### Composition and release
Retitle to Background and composition; I will tell you where to move the info around  Done
Audio sample looks good!
Remove wikilink on the 1975  Done
The part of the second sentence from "representing the last two minutes" onwards should be moved to being part of the comp info  Done
"of the 1975's debut album." → "of The 1975." since you have already introduced the album as being eponymous  Done
The vinyl and remaster releases should be directly after the above info, plus move comp to its own para because there will be enough sentences once you have added the representation part.  Done
Should guitar-heavy really be in speech marks?  Done
"two minutes and thirteen seconds." → "2 minutes and 13 seconds." per MOS:NUM on comparative values
While MOS:NUM is not one of the five MoS pages that fall under GA criteria, the section on comparative values states: "Comparable values should be all spelled out or all in figures". Giacobbe talk 11:58, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Yeah that is reasonable, also sorry if I was being too fussy. --K. Peake 19:47, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
@Kyle Peake: I appreciate the thoroughness! It's like a review and copy-edit all in one shot. Giacobbe talk 20:23, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
The writers/producers sentence should be the one before the lyrical content  Done
Remove pipe on A-side  Done
"since it makes" → "since the limited pressing makes"  Done
Pipe music streaming to Streaming media  Done
The remaster release date is not directly sourced  Done


### Critical reception and promotion
"from contemporary music critics, and has gained" → "from contemporary music critics and has since gained" due to the source's date  Done
The Post does not really violate WP:RSSM, as this is only used for reception
"about cocaine", and listed it" → "about cocaine" and listed it"  Done
"during a charity show for" → "in the middle of a charity show for"  Done
"and said the audience's reaction" → "going on to say the audience's reaction"  Done


### Credits and personnel
Should the pipes to the 1975 from the members be kept when the band itself is wikilinked in this section? If they are kept, pipe Matthew Healy to their article instead since his page has been merged and if not, remove any pipe altogether.  Done


### References
Copyvio score looks strong at 14.5%!!!
Good job adding the correct URL for ref 3 by now!


### External links
Good


### Final comments and verdict
 On hold until all of the issues are fixed; got through this quite quickly! --K. Peake 19:47, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
@Kyle Peake: I think I've addressed all of your comments. Let me know if there's anything I've missed  Giacobbe talk 20:24, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
(CA)Giacobbe  Pass now, added in a slight copy edit to the lead but everything else was executed greatly on your part! --K. Peake 07:38, 14 June 2021 (UTC)