# Talk:Coal Glen mine disaster

This review is transcluded from Talk:Coal Glen mine disaster/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Zawed (talk · contribs) 09:42, 8 May 2023 (UTC)

 
I will take this one, comments to follow in due course. Zawed (talk) 09:42, 8 May 2023 (UTC)

@Zawed: ? -Indy beetle (talk) 08:28, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
This is looking in very good order, minimal nitpicks.
Lead

but the true death toll may be higher. : could be me, but "true" seems to imply that the authorities were lying. Perhaps "actual" may be a better term to use?
Done.
Background

The first sentence of the 3rd paragraph is quite long with several commas, suggest breaking it up.
Split and slightly revised.
Explosions

At about 9:30 a.m. on May 27, 1925 the...: comma after 1925 I think?
Done.
Response and effects

It arrived in Raleigh the following day.: where is Raleigh relative to the mine site, link if possible too?
Working on this. The car apparently made it all the way to Coal Glen (news article), and once I find a source discussing its arrival there there will be little need to mention its stop in Raleigh.
Resolved, the car came to Coal Glen on May 28.
Legacy

Doing the source checks, ref 27 says there were a couple of fatalities after the mine reopened and ref 28 says 14; is this worth mentioning?
Sources

The print sources appear to be reputable publishers, and the journal ref is associated with a university
Did a spotcheck on refs 1, 24, 27 and 28, and these look fine
Other stuff

Image tags OK
No dupe links
That's it for me. Cheers, Zawed (talk) 09:40, 22 May 2023 (UTC)

Hi Indy Beetle, just checking in on the progress of this. It is my understanding you are still working on this? Cheers, Zawed (talk) 10:48, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
Sorry yes I'll get on it, these past few days have been busier than I anticipated. -Indy beetle (talk) 09:44, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
No worries, I appreciate that my chase up was somewhat ironic given the length of time it took for me to review the article to begin with! Zawed (talk) 10:31, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
Looks good, passing as GA as I believe this meets the necessary criteria. Zawed (talk) 10:20, 14 June 2023 (UTC)