# Talk:Circuit City Stores, Inc. v. Adams

The text says "Adams appealed to the Supreme Court which agreed to hear the case." My reading of the current text is that Adams won in the appeals court, so why would he appeal to the Supreme Court? Rjm at sleepers (talk) 06:03, 22 January 2011 (UTC)

Fixed it. You're correct, Circuit City appealed. Thanks for pointing it out. -- Lord Roem (talk) 06:31, 22 January 2011 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Circuit City Stores, Inc. v. Adams/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts?   22:35, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

lead
Needs rewriting and expanding to become a summary rather than an introduction per WP:LEAD
Opinion of the court
Numbers 1-9 should be spelt out as words per WP:ORDINAL
Quotations should be marked by quote marks ("), not apostrophes per MOS:NUM#Quotation marks
Punctuation at the end of quotes should be outside the quote marks per MOS:LQ
Nothing major just MoS compliance. I'll put it on hold to give you chance to sort it. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts?   23:44, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

All looks good now. Excellent work. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts?   02:21, 2 March 2011 (UTC)