# Talk:Brazil at the 2014 Winter Paralympics

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Brazil at the 2014 Winter Paralympics. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140221103344/http://portalbraganca.com.br/esporte/paralimpiadas-de-inverno-2014-andre-cintra-e-fernando-aranha-serao-os-primeiros-atletas-da-historia-a-representar-o-brasil-nos-jogos-paralimpicos-de-inverno-que-serao-disputados-em-sochi-na-russ.php to http://portalbraganca.com.br/esporte/paralimpiadas-de-inverno-2014-andre-cintra-e-fernando-aranha-serao-os-primeiros-atletas-da-historia-a-representar-o-brasil-nos-jogos-paralimpicos-de-inverno-que-serao-disputados-em-sochi-na-russ.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:10, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Brazil at the 2014 Winter Paralympics/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Dom497 (talk · contribs) 18:03, 1 May 2018 (UTC)

Will start review now.--Dom497 (talk) 18:03, 1 May 2018 (UTC)


### Lead
"Their best performance..." - Replace with something like "The country's best performance..." or "The nation's best performance..."
Done. Courcelles (talk) 18:41, 1 May 2018 (UTC)


### Background
Looks good!


### Disability classification
See discussion here. In other words, nomination will be on hold for a couple days but will not be stopped until consensus is reached.


### Alpine skiing
"Only the two best runs for each rider counted, and his combined time was two minutes and forty-two seconds, earning him 28th place out of 33 competitors." - Use numbers for times since it is easier to read. Also reword the end of the sentence to: "...placing 28th out of 33 competitors."
Done. Courcelles (talk) 18:36, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
What was Andre Pereira's classification?
Classifications were not used for snowboard cross, all the standing athletes participated in one pool, without time adjustments for classification. Courcelles (talk) 18:36, 1 May 2018 (UTC)


### Cross-country skiing
"Athletes classified LW12 had..." --> "Athletes classified as LW12 had..."
Done. Courcelles (talk) 18:40, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
Random comment: I never knew the Paralympics were so complicated in terms of classifications and timings.
Some sports are, some aren't.  Cross-country is one of the more complicated.  Don't even get me started on the relays they introduced in Peyongchang...  Courcelles (talk) 18:40, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
"...this placed him 15th out of 21 competitors, and over 8 minutes behind the winning time of 40 minutes and 51 seconds" --> "...placing him 15th out of 21 competitors, and over 8 minutes behind the winning time of 40 minutes and 51 seconds."
Done. Courcelles (talk) 18:40, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
"and Rocha was eliminated" - This is implied so it is not needed.
You're right.  Gone.


#### Men's sprint
In the "Final" he is ranked 20th. How can be ranked 20th in the Final if he didn't qualify for it?
Oops, fixed. Courcelles (talk) 18:40, 1 May 2018 (UTC)


### References
Please make sure the date formatting is consistent between the formatting used in the text and references (for example, ref 1 is formatted differently than the others)
Oops, that was the one reference in the article as I found it, and I just plum missed the formatting. Courcelles (talk) 18:42, 1 May 2018 (UTC)

On hold.--Dom497 (talk) 18:33, 1 May 2018 (UTC)

Dom497, that's everything addressed!  Thanks for the reviews! Courcelles (talk) 18:42, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
I'm just going to pass this since it doesn't look like the discussion at the WikiProject will start or happen anytime soon.--Dom497 (talk) 14:38, 3 May 2018 (UTC)