# Talk:Kiki Wong

A few quick comments, I don't have time to offer a full GA review. 

For purposes of verifiability, it isn't really helpful to have all the citations at the end of a paragraph. For instance, the para beginning Wong says she has played piano since she was six, has 5 cites in a row. It is hard to then track down what supports what. Which cites support which sentences? it is helpful, within reason, to split them up or just remove excess ones.
a range gigs is this missing "of"?
Not a big thing, but it is generally preferable to have citations in numerical order (ascending)
Per WP:BLPNAME I don't think that we should name the child
What is a "metal-leaning"  guitar?
The career section would benefit from breaking up in sections.
All information in the lead and infobox should ideally be mentioned and cited in the article body, right now it looks like birth date and name aren't
Be prepared to defend the use of WP:LINKEDIN. Can you authenticate that it is actually hers? It would be preferable to replace with a secondary source where possible, and I know that at least one claim, her undergraduate degree, can be cited elsewhere (in this case, CBS).
Hopefully this is helpful while you are waiting for a full review! Eddie891  Talk Work  09:18, 30 April 2025 (UTC)

Oh, I missed this comment, thanks! Jonathan Deamer (talk) 13:05, 9 May 2025 (UTC)
I think I've now addressed all of these:. Notes:
Generally improved source text integrity and the most egregious examples of many cites in a row
Sections in "career" - improvements to subheading text welcome
Very fair point RE: LinkedIn; the only things it was used to verify were her birth name and number of years in Nylon Pink, which aren't essential
Jonathan Deamer (talk) 15:34, 9 May 2025 (UTC)
Many thanks for the input @Eddie891, much appreciated. Jonathan Deamer (talk) 15:34, 9 May 2025 (UTC)