# Talk:Magnus II of Norway

If he led an expedition in the late 1050s, how can he have been born in 1048? Even vikings did not let 10-year olds lead expeditions. He is also listed in sources prior to his brother Olaf, suggesting he was the elder son. In light of this I think his date of birth was likely earlier in the 1040s, no later than 1042. --anon  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.175.86.130 (talk) 08:25, 27 October 2008 (UTC) 

This review is transcluded from Talk:Magnus II of Norway/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Royroydeb (talk · contribs) 13:45, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
Hello I will be reviewing this article.

 He was not included in official Norwegian regnal lists until modern times, but has since been counted as Magnus II.-Why?
RRD13 (talk) 13:45, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
That's explained in the last two paragraphs in the kingship section. Thhist (talk) 21:08, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Magnus II of Norway. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130615012108/http://lind.no/nor/index.asp?lang=&emne=&vis=s_e_harald_hardrade2 to http://lind.no/nor/index.asp?lang=&emne=&vis=s_e_harald_hardrade2
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:34, 7 December 2017 (UTC)