# Talk:North Carolina Superintendent of Public Instruction

Would it not make sense to merge this article with the North Carolina Department of Public Instruction?
User:G._Moore talk  20:59, 27 November 2019 (UTC)

NC Insight 1990 -Indy beetle (talk) 12:08, 27 August 2022 (UTC)

[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
-Indy beetle (talk) 09:01, 12 October 2022 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:North Carolina Superintendent of Public Instruction/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: NSNW (talk · contribs) 04:03, 29 January 2023 (UTC)

Will start the review in a few days; will also do the three other reviews concerning the North Carolina government. NSNW (talk) 04:03, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it well written?
A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct: 

B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation: 

Is it verifiable with no original research?
A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline: 

B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines: 

C. It contains no original research: 

D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism: 

Is it broad in its coverage?
A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic: 

B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style): 

Is it neutral?
It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each: 

Is it stable?
It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute: 

Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content: 

B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions: 

Overall:
Pass or Fail: 


### Prose:
Very little issues here:


#### History of the office
"In 1868 the state ratified a new constitution which provided for a system of public schools to be led by a Superintendent of Public Instruction and a State Board of Education"; pronoun misusage, 'which provided' should be 'that provided'.
"but the bill was quashed in a House of Representatives' committee."; the noun form is incorrect, remove the apostrophe.


#### Duties and structure
"They are seventh in line of succession to the governor."; should be 'in the line of succession'.
That's everything. NSNW (talk) 01:56, 1 February 2023 (UTC)

@NSNW: All should be good now per my edit. -Indy beetle (talk) 09:14, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
Passing. NSNW (talk) 13:17, 3 February 2023 (UTC)