# Talk:Delaware Route 11

This review is transcluded from Talk:Delaware Route 11/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: MathewTownsend (talk · contribs) 10:39, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

I've read this article and will review it shortly. It is well written.  MathewTownsend (talk) 10:39, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
review
Basically the article is fine but some of the prose could be clarified.

"DE 11 was created by 1936 on a road taken over by the state by 1931." - can this be clearer?
Reworded. Dough4872 22:29, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
"DE 11 begins at the Maryland border in western Kent County, where MD 302 continues to the west towards Templeville, Maryland" - so here the road split? MD 302 goes west, and DE 11 heads northeast?
The road that carries DE 11 crosses the border into Maryland and the route becomes MD 302. Clarified. Dough4872 22:29, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
"In the center of Hartly, the route crosses DE 44. After DE 44, the road heads north before curving northeast and leaving Hartly." - something like "In the center of Hartly, the route crosses DE 44, then heads north before it curves northeast and leaves Hartly."?
Reworded. Dough4872 22:29, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
"and passing a few homes." - passes a few homes
Reworded. Dough4872 22:29, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
"before coming to " - it comes to an end
Changed. Dough4872 22:29, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
In the "History" section: "by 1920",  "by 1931", "by 1936" - its a little clumsy - perhaps there's no other way to phrase this.
That's the best way to phrase it as the changes happened by those dates. Dough4872 22:29, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
These are suggestions to improve the prose. I made an edit.[1]
MathewTownsend (talk) 22:20, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the review, I have replied to the above comments. Dough4872 22:29, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
reply
Great! I just made one more little edit for the sake of prose.[2]
GA review-see WP:WIAGA for  criteria (and here for what they are not)

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose: clear and concise, respects copyright laws, correct spelling and grammar:

B. Complies with  MoS for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation: 

Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. Provides references to all sources: 

B. Provides in-line citations from reliable sources where necessary: 

C. No original research: 

Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Main aspects are addressed: 

B. Remains focused: 

Does it follow the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc: 

Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales: 

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions: 

Overall:
Pass or Fail: 
Pass!

Congratulations!  MathewTownsend (talk) 23:00, 3 July 2012 (UTC)