# Talk:North Community High School

Nice looking article. A good example to other schools. Victuallers (talk) 22:06, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)
There are a few problems here, but most of them should be pretty easily resolved.
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose):  b (MoS): 
The article looks fine, but I would be more happy if the lead were longer and covered some of the more controversial elements of the school. See WP:LEAD.
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 
There are several statement which need references, as tagged. I also think you need some referencing in the lead, which is totally unreferenced right now.
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 

It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars etc.: 

It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 
Some more modern pictures, perhaps of interior or of sports would be nice, if possible, but if not it is understandable.
Overall:
Pass/Fail: 

I have added citations and expanded the lead with citations. Sorry about not having any recent photographs. Unfortunately I won't be able to get any modern photographs until around summertime. Is there anything else that needs to be done? Eóin (talk) 02:40, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
The only thing holding me back from passing it would be that the first paragraph of the lead still seems largely unreferenced and overall it feels like it lacks cohesiveness. SorryGuy  Talk  03:39, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
I added another citation to the lead. Do you feel the lead lacks cohesiveness or the entire article? Eóin (talk) 22:56, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
I was referring specifically to the lead, especially the second paragraph where statements seem to sort of thrown together. I also left citation need notices on the two statements which I feel need them. Anything referring to a reputation is an opinion and POV unless it is referenced, the comment about attempting to reduce a certain population could be considered controversial. SorryGuy  Talk  02:12, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
I can't reference any recent sources that say North is a tough school but here are two from 1988. 

Once a school with a predominantly Jewish student body, North has been through many changes as the city and Northside neighborhoods changed. Located in what is now a mostly black neighborhood, it was once a nearly all black school. That changed in 1982 with the introduction of four magnet programs meant to draw students from throughout the city and nearby suburbs. 

Beasley points with pride to the magnets, which last year had enrollments that were about 60 percent white and 40 percent minority. The school offers magnet programs in science, math and technology; visual and performing arts; advanced technical courses; and in broadcasting for KBEM radio. 

North had a reputation as a tough school before the the magnets. Eight months ago, Beasley feared that it might acquire that reputation again. 

Last Jan. 12, Pedro Ramos, a 17-year-old North High student, died of injuries he suffered when he was beaten in a school hallway by three other youths who did not attend the school.  
North High, until a few years ago the blight of the Minneapolis school system [1]

So I have changed "The school has a reputation as a tough inner city school" to "The neighborhood that North is located in is known for high levels of poverty and crime." 

http://www.ci.minneapolis.mn.us/ward5/docs/Serious_Crime_North_Mpls_fall_11122007.pdf
reputation of the north side as an area that has seen more than its fair share of crime has tainted some people's view of the school. (MPR)
As for lowering the school's minority enrollment would this sentence be better?
"Desegregation efforts, such as magnet school programs, have attempted to attract students from  throughout Minneapolis and nearby suburbs"
I will attempt to rewrite the second paragraph of the lead today. -Eóin (talk) 19:17, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

Rewrote the second paragraph to hopefully make it flow better. Eóin (talk) 21:27, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

Releford, Patrice (December 2, 2008), "Charter school to share Minneapolis public school space " Star Tribune

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on North Community High School. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20061013110638/http://www.mpls.k12.mn.us/25Jul2006 to http://www.mpls.k12.mn.us/25Jul2006
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 00:49, 23 January 2016 (UTC)