# Talk:Chrono (series)

Meets the criteria well enough to flag as a GA. Needs some copy-editing and other fixes, but nothing to fail over. — Deckiller 17:33, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Pretty darn good, but Nuumamonjaa, wow. Gets some serious coverage here... Zeality 04:57, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
Great series of articles, but I'd like more coverage on the three other Satellview games (Music Library, Character Library, and Jet Bike Special). And this is just kind of a small bother to me, but on the Chrono (Series) article, I would like the logo of Radical Dreamers to be present in it's section. I mean, Trigger, Cross, and even the ill fated Brake have their logos put up. Radical Dreamers just sticks out like a sore thumb without a picture.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.195.202.145 (talk) 10:41, 8 October 2007 (UTC) 

If a game is ever announced, this can be a development section for it, but until then, it would rest well right in this article and help build it up for Featured article status. Better to have one featured article than two GA's. And again, if another game is announced, it can be split out, but this article could use the content, so I propose a merge. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 02:57, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

The nature of Chrono Break is such that every little detail provides information. I would only support a merger if you lifted the article as is and put it here, without excising anything. We can have an FA AND a GA otherwise. ZeaLitY [ DREAM - REFLECT ] 06:11, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
I think that would be fine, with the headings removed, the article isn't that huge, and will be in proper proportion once the rest of the article is built up. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 22:03, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
I don't think I support this. I think that it's a pretty sorry state of affairs if simply making an article longer like this, whilst maintaining the same number of sources per paragraph, makes it more likely to get to FA. I think rationales for merges should be more about what would be best for the casual user than what is most likely to get featured, and I think the Chrono Break article is substantial enough to be able to sit on its own (as evidenced by it being a GA) - rst20xx (talk) 14:02, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
There is nothing "sorry" about it. Just because an article is GA doesn't mean it can't be merged, and yes, the goal for all wikipedia articles if Featured Status, and that means two GA's are not as good ad one FA. Unless they make another Chrono game, this is a permanent GA, and if it was merged to the main article, would boost the series article and help it get featured. No information would be lost, and it would be very presentable for the average reader, who probably never even heard of Chrono Break and would know all about it by going to the series article. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 02:57, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
But why does merging two articles, whilst maintaining the same number of sources per paragraph, make them more likely to be a viable FA? They should be no more viable as they'd still be just as well researched and referenced!!! If they are more viable, then you're playing a broken system - rst20xx (talk) 13:24, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
Because it helps make the series article more comprehensive, and eliminates a permanent GA status article. If a new game ever came out, it would be split again, but there is no guarantee that will happen. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 16:51, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
Did you even read what I wrote?!? rst20xx (talk) 20:08, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
Yeah, some nonsense that the system is broken? Take it up with people who can change what bothers you, but FA's still trump GA's. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 21:37, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
Oh, I have - rst20xx (talk) 02:13, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

I think you guys should reference Crimsom Echoes its a fangame but its very well known one wich created a lot of steering i believe it deserves a mention in the main page at least.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.244.5.29 (talk) 23:15, 19 July 2009 (UTC) 

List of interviews concerning the Chrono games: https://www.chronocompendium.com/Term/Interviews.html --Mika1h (talk) 01:29, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Chrono (series). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.square-enix.com/eng/group/index.html
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.gamespot.com/gamespot/features/all/greatestgames/index.html
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080723051728/www.edge-online.com/features/japan-votes-all-time-top-100 to http://www.next-gen.biz/features/japan-votes-all-time-top-100
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:37, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Chrono (series). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927192627/http://mitsuda.cocoebiz.com/friends/kato.html to http://mitsuda.cocoebiz.com/friends/kato.html
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120122102056/http://www.gamespot.com/news/2782608.html to http://www.gamespot.com/news/2782608.html
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927174948/http://www.production-ig.co.jp/contents/works_sp/0330_/index.html to http://www.production-ig.co.jp/contents/works_sp/0330_/index.html
Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/60eLEcdUY?url=http://psx.ign.com/articles/166/166322p1.html to http://psx.ign.com/articles/166/166322p1.html
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.1up.com/do/feature?pager.offset=0&cId=3162780
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:56, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Chrono (series). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090526091527/http://www.rpgplanet.com/chrono/og_index.shtml to http://www.rpgplanet.com/chrono/og_index.shtml
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090209023741/http://music.ign.com/articles/937/937683p5.html to http://music.ign.com/articles/937/937683p5.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:02, 7 August 2017 (UTC)

Another Eden should probably be added to this page. Two key staff and very similar elements.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by FormX (talk • contribs) 19:04, 22 April 2019 (UTC) 

Doesn't make it a Chrono game, but could belong in the legacy section or something. ~ Dissident93 (talk) 03:50, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
I wouldn’t actively oppose it, but to me, I think it’s mention in the “related” section of the template is sufficient to me... Sergecross73 msg me 15:02, 23 April 2019 (UTC)