# Talk:Motivation crowding theory

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): W.s.campbell.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 04:31, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Motivation crowding theory. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://archive.is/20120717222231/http://journal.southerneconomic.org/doi/abs/10.4284/sej.2010.76.3.678 to http://journal.southerneconomic.org/doi/abs/10.4284/sej.2010.76.3.678
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100703161543/http://carmine.se.edu/cvonbergen/The_real_and_imagined_harmful%20effects%20of%20rewards.pdf to http://carmine.se.edu/cvonbergen/The_real_and_imagined_harmful%20effects%20of%20rewards.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:22, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

Removing this from article to meet DYK standards after DYK got pulled.

Thus, according to most theories before the 1970s, offering extrinsic incentives would only promote more of the rewarded behavior.
Rewards can serve as a signal in two ways (described below), they argue: signals to actors and signals to observers.
Rewards are conditional on task engagement.
Rewards can be interpreted by the agent or observers as controlling.--Farang Rak Tham  (Talk) 08:14, 23 June 2019 (UTC)

In "Debate and meta-analyses" section the statement: "Through the debate, consensus seems to have emerged that crowding out reliably occurs if the following conditions are met:" does not seem to be supported by anything in the reference [33] (Gneezy, Uri; Meier, Stephan; Rey-Biel, Pedro (2011).) and the references for each condition do not really suggest an emerging consensus.
I think the options are either:

the statement be corrected to align with the existing references (e.g. "although a general consensus has not been achieved, some patterns are common in meta-analysis:")
add references that align better with the existing statement
remove the statement
I don't have confidence in my knowledge in the area to know which option is best, but I thought I should flag it because it seemed very misleading.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jamespitt (talk • contribs) 07:08, 20 June 2022 (UTC)