# Talk:Conduit (The X-Files)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Conduit (The X-Files)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: That Ole Cheesy Dude (Talk to the hand!) 05:40, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

"which would go on become" go on to become
"find that her younger brother" Needs clarification as to whose younger brother this refers to.
"similarities to his own childhood" Childhood experience?
"and has not been seen since" never to be seen again or somesuch? Seems a little disjointed.
Lake Okobogee links to a disambig page, should be: East Okoboji Lake
I think zeroes is more common that zeros and Webster yields Zeroes as well...
"episode they wrote" Space after the dot between the ref. Needs removal.
"reestablished" re-est
"with the episode being describing it as" with the episode being described as?

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose):  -->  (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  --> 
A few MoS and prose issues, nothing too serious.
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references):  (citations to reliable sources):  (OR): 
Perfic'.
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  (focused): 
Perfic'.
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 
Perfic'
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 
Perfic'.
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  (appropriate use with suitable captions): 
Perfic'
Overall:
Pass/Fail: 

That Ole Cheesy Dude (Talk to the hand!) 05:40, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for taking the time to review this. I have addressed the points you've raised, taking your suggestions in all cases but the fourth, where I instead just removed the disjointed-sounding clause. GRAPPLE X 15:05, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
Passed. Good show. That Ole Cheesy Dude (Talk to the hand!) 15:39, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
Thanks! GRAPPLE X 15:40, 18 July 2011 (UTC)