# Talk:Fenmore Baldwin

This review is transcluded from Talk:Fenmore Baldwin/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: BrickHouse337 (talk · contribs) 22:48, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose):  b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): 
Fairly well written. I see no major issues.
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 
Looks good; all of the sources are reliable and verifiable; great job!
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 
Fairly well covered as far as focus.
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 

It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 

Overall:
Pass/Fail: 
Overall, the article is in good article condition. While it is still fairly new, I see a lot of work has been put into it. I see no further issues to be addressed. Pass. --Brick House 337 00:37, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
Thanks so much for this BrickHouse! Means a lot  Creativity97 00:55, 8 August 2013 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Fenmore Baldwin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120608050935/http://social.entertainment.msn.com:80/tv/blogs/tv-buzz-blogpost.aspx?post=8ae415a1-4602-435e-84e7-b7c9b9e21d78 to http://social.entertainment.msn.com/tv/blogs/tv-buzz-blogpost.aspx?post=8ae415a1-4602-435e-84e7-b7c9b9e21d78
Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/6IwR0mQzJ?url=http://entertainment.ca.msn.com/tv/interview-yandrs-christian-leblanc-elizabeth-hendrickson-and-jeff-branson to http://entertainment.ca.msn.com/tv/interview-yandrs-christian-leblanc-elizabeth-hendrickson-and-jeff-branson
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130507134337/http://www.chicgalleria.com/2012/12/exclusive-interview-actor-max-ehrich/ to http://www.chicgalleria.com/2012/12/exclusive-interview-actor-max-ehrich/
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130606063126/http://daytimeconfidential.zap2it.com:80/2013/01/16/fen-frames-jamie-on-the-young-and-the-restless to http://daytimeconfidential.zap2it.com/2013/01/16/fen-frames-jamie-on-the-young-and-the-restless
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130513125119/http://daytimeconfidential.zap2it.com:80/2013/02/05/will-fenmores-antics-wreck-lauren-and-michaels-marriage-on-the-young-and-the-restless to http://daytimeconfidential.zap2it.com/2013/02/05/will-fenmores-antics-wreck-lauren-and-michaels-marriage-on-the-young-and-the-restless
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:45, 30 December 2016 (UTC)