# Talk:Luna (Feid and ATL Jacob song)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Luna (Feid and ATL Jacob song)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: Pollosito (talk · contribs) 22:12, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: K. Peake (talk · contribs) 07:24, 10 June 2024 (UTC)

It is reasonably well written.
a. (prose, spelling, and grammar): 

b. (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): 

It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a. (reference section): 

b. (citations to reliable sources): 

c. (OR): 

d. (copyvio and plagiarism): 

It is broad in its coverage.
a. (major aspects): 

b. (focused): 

It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 

It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): 

b. (appropriate use with suitable captions): 

Overall:
Pass/fail: 

(Criteria marked  are unassessed)
I will crack on with this one right away! --K. Peake 07:24, 10 June 2024 (UTC)


### Infobox and lead
WP:OVERLINK of Fred under songwriters and ATL Jacob under producers
 Done One thing, "Fred" => "Feid" LOL. Santi (talk) 17:26, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
"on December 1, 2023 through" → "on December 1, 2023, through" plus this should be the sentence directly before the composition instead
 Done Santi (talk) 17:26, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
"but later sent the track to" → "until later being sent to"
 Done Santi (talk) 17:26, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
"It is the second song on which Villada collaborates with an American hip hop producer after "Le Pido a Dios" with DJ Premier, so it was" → "The second song on which Villada collaborates with an American hip hop producer after "Le Pido a Dios" with DJ Premier, it was" and make this the sentence directly after the writers/producers
 Done Santi (talk) 17:26, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
I think it is worth noting how many countries it further reached the top 10 in and the certifications, in a separate sentence
 Done Tell me if you liked the result. Santi (talk) 17:26, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
"An accompanying music video, directed by Sebastián Sánchez and released on March 6, 2024" → "An accompanying music video, directed by Sebastián Sánchez and released on March 6, 2024," with the wikilink
 Done Santi (talk) 17:26, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
I think the synopsis summary here can be cut off after him going back in time
 Done Santi (talk) 17:26, 10 June 2024 (UTC)


### Background and critical reception
Are you sure this shouldn't be titled Background and composition?
 Not done Yes, 69,886% sure. The way in which the information about the composition and the observation of the Argentine Billboard staff is presented could prevent it from being called "composition" instead of "critical reception". Santi (talk) 17:35, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
The opening sentence reads weirdly and should say in the order that he released his first EP Sixdo as a surprise release through Universal Music Latino
 Not done I don't understand your pov. If you mean mentioning the album first and then the EP, I don't think that's a good idea. It is this way because the EP has a collaboration with a hip hop producer, a characteristic that this song also shares, so the background starts from there. Further back, that is, Feliz Cumpleaños Ferxxo..., has no direct or indirect connection with the song. Santi (talk) 17:35, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
Remove overly obvious wikilink on studio album
 Done Santi (talk) 17:35, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
"he announced on" → "Villada announced on"
 Done Santi (talk) 17:35, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
"surprise release and sharing that" → "surprise release and sharing,"
 Done Santi (talk) 17:35, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
Audio sample looks good!
 Comment: Thank u. Santi (talk) 17:35, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
"through the window."" → "through the window"." per MOS:QUOTE
 Done Santi (talk) 17:35, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
"It was" → "The song was"
 Done Santi (talk) 17:35, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
Remove wikilink on Italy
 Done Santi (talk) 17:35, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
"go with another person."" → "go with another person"."
 Done Santi (talk) 17:35, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
"to the global level."" → "to the global level"." and add "The staff of" before the publication
 Done Santi (talk) 17:35, 10 June 2024 (UTC)


### Commercial performance
Img looks good!
 Comment: Thank u. Santi (talk) 17:47, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
Swap this with music video for the correct order
 Done Santi (talk) 17:47, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
"received a 3x Platinum" → "received a triple platinum" and mention how many units signified by this in the country
 Done As I saw in other recent GAs, it is not necessary, but it's fine. Santi (talk) 17:47, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
"despite a decrease of 8%" → "despite a decrease of 6%" per the source
 Done Santi (talk) 17:47, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
Write quadruple platinum instead and mention this was in the US
 Not done I think the fact that such information appears in a paragraph focused exclusively on commercial perf in the US gives that enough sense. Santi (talk) 17:47, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
"outside the United States compared" → "outside the US compared" per MOS:US
 Done Santi (talk) 17:47, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
"the song climbed three spots to" → "the song had climbed to" since this is two weeks, not one
 Done Santi (talk) 17:47, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
Mention both the artists it was the first top five for
 Done Santi (talk) 17:47, 10 June 2024 (UTC)


### Music video
Merge with the below section and retitle to Music video and promotion
 Partly done: Renamed to "promotion" and subsections added. Santi (talk) 17:53, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
"this song so far, we made" → "this song so far. We made" per the source
 Done Santi (talk) 17:53, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
InfoBae should not be italicized
 Done Santi (talk) 17:53, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
"resonance among viewers."" → "resonance among viewers"." per MOS:QUOTE
 Done Santi (talk) 17:53, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
"shoot her partner starring Villada" what does this mean?
 Done Sorry for strange expresions, I hope it's better now. Santi (talk) 17:53, 10 June 2024 (UTC)


### Live performances and covers
Make this the second para of the above section
 Partly done per above. Santi (talk) 18:16, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
Pipe acoustic to Acoustic music
 Done Santi (talk) 18:16, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
Pipe Lollapalooza Argentina to Lollapalooza
 Done Santi (talk) 18:16, 10 June 2024 (UTC)


### Accolades
Per the Best Urban Song being written out in the lead, you need to add a mention of it in prose here – I would suggest a para summarizing these awards
 Not done What do you refer? This or replace the table to a para? Santi (talk) 17:57, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
Pollosito Upon further assessment, I would suggest to replace with prose since this is not many awards and also, you missed changing 4x Platinum to quadruple platinum. --K. Peake 20:21, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
@Kyle Peake: Aaa ok. And sorry for the 4x platinum. Santi (talk) 20:28, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
@Kyle Peake: Now  Done. Would you tell me about the result? Santi (talk) 20:54, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
Refs should be centered
 Done Oops. Santi (talk) 17:57, 10 June 2024 (UTC)


### Credits and personnel
Use {{spaced ndash}} so there is the right space between credits and personnel
 Done Santi (talk) 18:00, 10 June 2024 (UTC)


### Charts
#### Weekly charts
Pipe FONOTICA to Asociación Costarricense de la Industria Fonográfica y Afines
 Done Santi (talk) 18:03, 10 June 2024 (UTC)


#### Monthly charts
Good


### Certifications
Good


### Release history
Good


### References
Copyvio score looks great at 27.0%!!!
 Comment: Thank u. Santi (talk) 18:14, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
Regarding MOS:CAPS issues, only remove capitalization on any refs where it is not part of the stylization of the artist or musical work name
 Done Tell me more if you want. Santi (talk) 18:14, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
Cite Los 40 as publisher instead on refs 1 and 44
 Done Santi (talk) 18:14, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
Add Rolling Stone on ref 3 with the wikilink
 Done Oops. Santi (talk) 18:14, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
Pipe Vogue México to Vogue México y Latinoamérica on ref 4
 Done Santi (talk) 18:14, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
Cite Radio Programas del Perú as publisher instead on ref 5
 Done Santi (talk) 18:14, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
Wikilink El Colombiano on ref 8
 Done Santi (talk) 18:14, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
Pipe Universal Music Latino to Universal Music Latin Entertainment on ref 12
 Done Santi (talk) 18:14, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
Pipe Rolling Stone en Español to Rolling Stone on ref 13
 Done Santi (talk) 18:14, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
Pipe FONOTICA to Asociación Costarricense de la Industria Fonográfica y Afines on ref 18
 Done Santi (talk) 18:14, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
Cite Infobae as publisher instead on refs 37 and 40
 Done Santi (talk) 18:14, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
Wikilink YouTube on ref 39
 Done Santi (talk) 18:14, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
Cite AStv Colombia as publisher instead on ref 41
 Done Santi (talk) 18:14, 10 June 2024 (UTC)


### Final comments and verdict
 On hold until all of the issues are fixed; I'll be able to get back on it even if you are done later today! --K. Peake 08:44, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
@Kyle Peake, one more thing, I hope not bother. Before pass or fail, I would like to ask if there is one interesting piece of information in this article that I can give for DYK, because from my perspective, I'm not sure or there really isn't any. It's to avoid screwing up just in case. Santi (talk) 21:13, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
Pollosito  Pass has come and in regards to DYK, I'd suggest the description of taking hip hop to god level. --K. Peake 21:53, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
@Kyle Peake: Thank you so much for this review. Santi (talk) 22:13, 10 June 2024 (UTC)


### Luna (Feid and ATL Jacob song)
Previous peer review

I've listed this article for peer review because I want a review on prose, and maybe language on this article before re-nominating to FAC.
Thanks, Santi (talk) 00:24, 6 April 2025 (UTC)

Just a heads up, you're only allowed to request one article to be peer reviewed. Erick (talk) 07:31, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
@Magiciandude@Magiciandude: Thanks. During the day, I'll close the other review temporarily. Santi (talk) 12:28, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Comment
Santi, the article is going to need more than a peer review to meet the standards of FA. I would strongly suggest seeking somebody fluent in English to directly rewrite the prose and maybe co-nominating with them. The PR would be more beneficial when just a few finishing touches are required.--NØ 17:48, 6 April 2025 (UTC)

@MaranoFan: Oh, holy fvck. So, what I have to do to co-nominate by then? Santi (talk) 22:10, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
You can make a request at WP:GOCER for someone to copyedit it. Make sure to point out its for FAC. Tarlby (t) (c) 16:11, 15 April 2025 (UTC)
@Tarlby: I had tried before, but the copy-editor did not fix prose nor grammar. I do not think it is a good idea to try again. Santi (talk) 13:48, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
I think it'd be worth another try. Note explicitly that you want the prose and grammar improved. Tarlby (t) (c) 15:30, 17 April 2025 (UTC)


#### Re-opening
This article was already copy-edited. @Erick; @MaranoFan; @Tarlby (the last mention is just in case): Is this better now? Santi (talk) 00:27, 3 June 2025 (UTC)


#### FAC PR sidebar
@Pollosito: I have added this article to the FAC PR review sidebar. Please consider reviewing articles listed there, and remove your entry when this is closed. I highly recommend that you also review articles at WP:FAC now: this will help you learn the FA criteria and build goodwill among FAC reviewers, making it more likely that your article will be reviewed. Z1720 (talk) 15:02, 26 June 2025 (UTC)

@Z1720: Thank you so much. Santi (talk) 19:14, 26 June 2025 (UTC)


#### Comments
Here'll be some of my comments. Arconning (talk) 15:58, 28 June 2025 (UTC)

@Arconning: Almost all comments addressed. I will research how to do the brief description for accolades. Santi (talk) 19:01, 29 June 2025 (UTC)
@Arconning: Pinging again. I have just finished all your observations. For the Accolades section, I remade it to text format because I do not find any not-too-old featured article that presents listicles and/or awards as tables. Is it fine for you? Santi (talk) 04:50, 20 August 2025 (UTC)
File:Feid, ATL Jacob - Luna.png - Fair Use, makes sense
File:ATL Jacob.png - CC BY 3.0
Alt-text is present and all have proper licensing, proper captioning, and are relevant to the article.
As this is an English language article, wouldn't it be more appropriate for a "translation" template (transl. "Moon") instead of (English: "Moon")?
Could some prose be supplied for the Accolades section? Just some brief descriptions.
","Luna" is three ", misplaced comma.
The song being certified diamond in Central America could be included in the lead.


#### Query from Z1720
@Pollosito: It has been over a month since the last comment. It this ready to be closed and nominated at WP:FAC? Z1720 (talk) 04:43, 10 August 2025 (UTC)

@Z1720: Today I'll try to write the summary in the accolades section so I see if this was the reason why the PR has stucked.Santi (talk) 17:29, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
@Pollosito: Unfortunately, many PRs receive limited comments. Since you are still working on your first FAC promotion, I suggest getting the help of a FA mentor and asking them to comment in this PR, or requesting comments in Wikiprojects attached to this article. I also suggest that you review other articles at WP:FAC now: this will build goodwill amongst the FAC community and help you learn the intricate and unwritten aspects of the FA criteria. Z1720 (talk) 17:43, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
@Z1720: Ok, I'll be active since today. I'm writing that part right now. I think the main reason the other user hasn't continued the review is because I didn't address it completely, as we can see above. Santi (talk) 00:59, 11 August 2025 (UTC)
Due to unforeseen circumstances, I couldn't finish the paragraph. Give me a week since today. Santi (talk) 13:42, 13 August 2025 (UTC)