# Talk:Meralda Warren

Is the importance of Meralda Warren as 'artist' really so great that she qualifies for a wikipedia entry?  or is it because she happens to be worldfamous in Pitcairn.
I am sure there are other  small communities who have an artist  who is at least as qualified as Meralda Warren.
That Warren had criticism on the sexual abuse is a known fact, but many had, either pro or contra. Are they all getting a Lemma?
What she had to say abt it was her personal opinion and could easily be countered by the fact that the court decided that British law alsways had been law on pitcairn. Apparently Warren herself - as witnessed by this very lemma-  that there was underage sex. That she had no problem with it doesnt mean other girls had no problem with it.
One of her critics is Brenda Christian, a former Mayor who took office after her brother Steve Christian and the prior mayor, was arrested for child abuse.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.159.130.241 (talk) 21:25, 2 January 2015 (UTC) 

I don't know about artist, but the verse of hers that is quoted pretty much proves she isn't a poet. Aredbeardeddwarf (talk) 22:17, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Rework Lead to put what is most significant earlier in it - the first book in Pitkern and English. If she is most recognized as an artist and poet, that should be emphasized.Parkwells (talk) 13:52, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

Many thanks for your copyedit.--ColonelHenry (talk) 14:38, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Meralda Warren/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Seabuckthorn (talk · contribs) 00:23, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
Nominator: ColonelHenry (talk)
Hi! My review for this article will be here shortly.  --Seabuckthorn ♥ 00:23, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

1: Well-written

a. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors: 
b. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists: 

2: Verifiable with no original research

a. Has an appropriate reference section:  Yes
b. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:  excellent (Thorough check on Google.)

c. No original research:   Done

3: Broad in its coverage

4: Neutral

5: Stable: No edit wars, etc:  Yes
6: Images  Done (None)

As per the above checklist, there are no issues with the article and it’s a GA. Thanks, ColonelHenry, very much for your diligence in writing such great articles. 
Promoting the article to GA status.  --Seabuckthorn ♥ 23:33, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Meralda-Elva-J-Warren.jpg
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 22:40, 21 July 2025 (UTC)