# Talk:Jacob L. Beilhart

This review is transcluded from Talk:Jacob L. Beilhart/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: GreatOrangePumpkin (talk · contribs) 10:14, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose):  b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): 
The lead is only two sentences long. Add important aspects from his early life, the foundation of the society and the last years. Two - three more sentences ought to do.--GoPTCN 11:01, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 
Blog accepted because the author is an expert
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 

It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 

It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 

Overall: I copyedited the article a bit and linked some uncommon words. Otherwise the article deserves the icon if you expand the section a bit.--GoPTCN 11:01, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
Pass/Fail: 

I've expanded the lead section. I'm always fearful that I'm including too much once I get started. I believe that I've addressed the concerns expressed above. Thanks!  Wikipelli Talk 18:36, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
Better, but the last sentence of the lead is not cited, though. Regards.--GoPTCN 20:03, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
I had left it off (per my comment on your talk page).... I've added the reference now. Thanks! Wikipelli Talk 20:08, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
Ok, then I will pass the article! :)--GoPTCN 20:12, 14 May 2012 (UTC)