# Talk:Norah Head Light

This review is transcluded from Talk:Norah Head Light/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: intelatitalk  01:21, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose):  b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): 
Minor thing, the Light keepers section should be expanded or combined into another section
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 
nice range of sources
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 
Understandable to the n00b
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 

It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 
the only non free image can't be replaced, and adds to the value of the article
Overall: One thing above needs to be done, and then I will pass the article
Pass/Fail: 

I merged the light keepers section into the history section. --Muhandes (talk) 06:04, 21 November 2010 (UTC)