# Talk:Doctor Who series 3

This review is transcluded from Talk:Doctor Who (series 3)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Auntieruth55 (talk · contribs) 15:33, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

I'll start this in the next couple of  days.  auntieruth (talk) 15:33, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, spelling, and grammar):  b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): 
I was bold and made some minor edits, links etc.
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):  d (copyvio and plagiarism): 

It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 

It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 

It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 

Overall:
Pass/Fail: 

I feel like there isn't enough in the critical reception section. Could someone add more to it? LROSE (talk) 10:20, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

You're more than welcome to do so. -- AlexTW 10:23, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Doctor Who series 14 which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RMCD bot 05:24, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

I am concerned that this article no longer meets the good article criteria due to uncited statements in the article, including entire paragraphs. Is anyone interestd in addressing this concern, or should this go to WP:GAR? Z1720 (talk) 13:52, 24 January 2025 (UTC)