# Talk:Hurricane Larry

*Oppose creation of this article as it is another fish spinner that hasn't done anything out of the ordinary. NoahTalk 11:00, 4 September 2021 (UTC)

Oppose as Noah said  HurricaneEdgar  15:35, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Comment we dont no if Larry will impact or not, due the poorly forecast i thick Larry dont not deserve to be article.  HurricaneEdgar  15:37, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Support i thick larry need article, but need some expand meteorological history preparation and impact and lead cleanup cite of NHC.  HurricaneEdgar  01:11, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
Oppose It's WP:TOOSOON to be making an article for this. Yes, this storm might impact Bermuda and Atlantic Canada, or it could be a fish storm.— Preceding unsigned comment added by TornadoLGS (talk • contribs) 18:56, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Wait per WP:CRYSTAL for now.  JavaHurricane — Preceding undated comment added 08:23, 8 September 2021
Comment Larry is bringing impacts to Newfoundland and Labrador right now ,so I think this article should stay. User:GDFilbert — Preceding undated comment added 03:03, 11 September 2021
Support Made landfall in Newfoundland as a hurricane. Anthony23066Talk - 14:59, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Oppose It appears that, aside from minor storm surge complications and a damaged school building on Newfoundland, Hurricane Larry has not not notable. All that needs to be said about this storm can be adequately stated in the season article. Drdpw (talk) 01:06, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
Neutral but I completed the section for Canada from the French article fr:Ouragan Larry (2021) in any case. Pierre cb (talk) 04:22, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
Wait and expand. Impact in Newfoundland appears significant enough, damage assessments are still ongoing. ~ KN2731 {talk · contribs} 04:30, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
On second thoughts, I feel that there's sufficient information to move to mainspace already. A couple of solid paragraphs (with potential for more) for Canada is enough, and Larry's still supposed to affect Greenland with snowstorms which should give us more sources. ~ KN2731 {talk · contribs} 08:46, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
Wait and Support as I want to wait to collect all damage information though I do support moving later as Larry did cause slightly less damage than Henri (Cat 1 landfall opposed to TS for Henri though Henri did hit a more populated place) and caused the same amount of deaths (2 rip currents). PlanetsForLife 00:18, 13 September 2021 (UTC)

I looked at the OPC's pressure map and I cannot tell if the 2 lows merged or passed by each other. Do these warnings apply to the remnants of larry or the powerful low? PlanetsForLife 12:13, 13 September 2021 (UTC)

Larry was absorbed by the other low between 18Z and 00Z. It's more clearly seen by the 3 hourly maps the WPC generates. Supportstorm (talk) 12:45, 13 September 2021 (UTC)

Is there more information on this boat stolen from a moorage in the Halifax Nova Scotia area? It sounds like a very bizarre story as yacht thefts are not really something on the radar here in this part of Canada. 72.142.92.198 (talk) 20:06, 12 October 2022 (UTC)

The redirect Hurricane Karry has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 January 17 § Hurricane Karry until a consensus is reached.  A1Cafel (talk) 05:28, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Hurricane Larry/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: Chicdat (talk · contribs) 16:43, 12 March 2025 (UTC)
Reviewer: Hurricanehink (talk · contribs) 03:11, 26 April 2025 (UTC)

Alright I finally got around to reviewing this. 

Lead
"Finally, on September 13, the storm was absorbed by a larger extratropical cyclone near Greenland." - Finally feels dramatic and unnecessary
Done.
Met history
"On August 26, the National Hurricane Center (NHC) was monitoring a tropical wave that was going to emerge off the coast of West Africa."
Ref 5 isn't loading for me. Could you change the tropical weather outlooks to text using the archive?
Done. It seems the original author did a typo, it was actually the 27th.
Also, you should mention that the NHC thought this wave had a decent chance of development, that's why they were monitoring it, right?
Added giving it a 20% chance of formation for the next five days.
"The tropical wave exited Africa on August 30, surrounded by an area of low pressure that had generally westward movement." - surrounded isn't the right term, since a tropical wave is an axis. If you don't want to use the TCR wording of "accompanied", then you could say "The tropical wave exited Africa on August 30, associated with an area of low pressure which moved generally westward."
Replaced "surrounded" with "associated", replaced "that had generally westward movement" with "moving generally westward", linked area of low pressure.
"the NHC designated the system as a tropical depression at 18:00 on August 31" - you need to specify it's UTC
Done.
" receiving the name Larry. Larry moved generally westward " - can you rewrite it so the same name doesn't happen twice in a row?
Replaced with "the storm"
" But Larry quickly recovered from this" - the "But" isn't necessary
Done.
". At 12:00 UTC on September 7, Larry weakened to 110 mph (175 km/h), leading reconnaissance aircraft to designate it as a Category 2 hurricane" - Recon doesn't downgrade a storm
Replaced with "becoming a Category 2 hurricane"
"By 00:00 UTC on September 11, Larry's speed had increased to 45 mph (75 km/h) as it approached the southeastern coast of Newfoundland, moving over Marticut Island." - I don't know what Marticut Island is, there's no link, and I'm not sure why it's mentioned
Removed.
"At 03:30 UTC on September 11, the storm made landfall in Newfoundland as a Category 1 hurricane with sustained winds of 80 mph (130 km/h) and a minimum central pressure of 960 millibars (28 inHg)." - where was the landfall?
Clarified.
"This storm caused hurricane-force winds and over 4 feet (120 centimetres) of snow in Greenland." - why is this in the met history and not impacts?
Removed the part about snow in Greenland. The hurricane-force winds part is technically related to the met history but if you want me to remove that too I can.
Preps and impacts
"No power outages or deaths were recorded, and overall damage was minimal." - could you elaborate on any of the damage that did occur? You mentioned winds and waves, but no impacts
TCR is not great for details, but it vaguely mentions impact to beaches due to storm surge, so I added that.
You cited ref 18, but that doesn't mention the storm surge directly (it has a few videos). I suggest citing the Bermuda Weather Service report for September 2021 or the WMO report for Bermuda. The bad news is that there isn't a direct link to the first report, which mentions rainfall totals, while the second one mentions the storm surge and some minor damage from the surge. Also, here is a brief bit about power outage on the island. It's not much, just a bit more than what you have. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk)  21:17, 27 April 2025 (UTC)
I can't access the WMO report, but I incorporated the other two refs into the article. 🐔 Chicdat  Bawk to me! 16:18, 1 May 2025 (UTC)
The lead says that the person went missing from the stolen boat, but the impact section doesn't specifically say when the person was declared missing, or if they were ever declared dead. Do you have any more on that, like the name of the boat? I can help find more info
From what I can find, its name was Secret Plans, and the person was an Antiguan fugitive named Karin Marley Simons. Is this WP:DUE for inclusion in the article?
Here is some more info - IDK, that sounds pretty interesting, that the person was a fugitive, stole another boat, and then went missing. Who knows, the person might've faked their death and actually gotten away with it. I think mentioning the boat name makes sense, since that's pretty standard when a boat goes missing during a storm. You probably don't need to mention the person's name, I only asked to see if I could find out more information. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk)  21:17, 27 April 2025 (UTC)
I included the name just for completeness, but if you want me to remove it, that's fine. 🐔 Chicdat  Bawk to me! 16:18, 1 May 2025 (UTC)
The impact section switches from having imperial units first or having metric units first. Considering the article is Canada-focused, I think all units should be metric first, but the whole article should be the same for consistency
The impact section is now fully metric. Since the MH is cited to the extremely imperial NHC, I'm hesitant to make it metric as well, but I guess per consistency, it should be done. More on that below.🐔 Chicdat  Bawk to me! 16:18, 1 May 2025 (UTC)
"Mayor Danny Breen confirmed that the hurricane caused a significant amount of damage around the city. " - what city?
St. John's, added and linked.
Could you link the Highway 90 that was damaged?
Linked.
"In Greenland, the snowfall forecast for ex-Larry, one of the few storms from the remnants of a tropical cyclone to pass so far north, was up to 4 feet of snow (120 cm) with some places along the coast receiving a rainfall equivalent." - that needs to be rewritten, it's too much for one sentence.
Done.
"Wind and snow caused a blizzard at Summit Camp, a weather station located on the ice sheet over 10,000 ft (3,000 m) above sea level." - same issue as earlier, the units need to be consistent with what's first
Done.
The article is decent, just some rough spots here or there, but nothing that should be too difficult to fix. Lemme know if you have any questions, Chicdat (talk · contribs). ♫ Hurricanehink (talk)  03:11, 26 April 2025 (UTC)

Everything but the units problem, which I'm still mulling over. No other Atlantic hurricane article uses metric first, but then again this is in Canadian English. I'm not sure. 🐔 Chicdat  Bawk to me! 16:18, 1 May 2025 (UTC)
Hurricane Juan uses metric first for the impact section. It's no big deal so I'll pass the article as is, but if you want to do more for the article in the future, it's something to consider. Good job on the article! ♫ Hurricanehink (talk)  18:59, 1 May 2025 (UTC)