# Talk:Cold Heart (Pnau remix)

Rovingrobert (talk) 11:53, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

@Rovingrobert: "Remix" is lowercase in the title ("remix") due to the guideline set out for us at MOS:MUSICCAPS. Per MUSICCAPS: For titles of works and releases, descriptive phrases in parentheses or after dashes, such as 'remix', 'acoustic version' and 'remastered', should not be considered part of song titles and should not be capitalized. This means that "remix" should not be capitalized, even if it is part of the official title. "Pnau" is fine to stay capitalized, because it is a proper noun (the name of a band). I hope this clears this up for you! Thanks! D🐶ggy54321 (let's chat!) 12:48, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
@Doggy54321: That makes sense, thank you! Rovingrobert (talk) 13:36, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

Do we have any information about the video ? --  Beardo (talk) 07:45, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

Besides the fact that @Andrew Meecham: has a Conflict of Interest. Spotify gives them songwriting credits. Universal Music puts their names in parentheses, I'm not sure what that means. Erinius (talk) 21:38, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
No reason at all as they are credited writers but there seems to be a concerted effort to keep any mention of them off this page - even removing reference to their Ivor Novello nomination for this track.  Most odd.  Are Pnau actually writers or just remixers is a whole other topic!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lolawler (talk • contribs) 08:32, 14 August 2022 (UTC) 
Actually strike my last comment - of course Pnau are writers as well as the remixers. Although not nominated for the Ivor’s they are credited on Spotify!   Lolawler (talk) 08:39, 14 August 2022 (UTC)

Hello Muhandes. Your recent edit ended up removing a reference named "Slovakia" used in the prose of this article. Now, it's undefined and generates an error. Also, the references you added replaced some 404 links, which I guess is an improvement ... but the charts that are linked don't list this song (or the artist) and don't make the charting claim verifiable. Are viable references available? -- mikeblas (talk) 01:11, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

@Mikeblas: Thanks for letting me know. I'll make sure I'm more careful in the future. Muhandes (talk) 07:22, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for fixing the undefined reference. Thing is, the links still go to irrelevant material. -- mikeblas (talk) 14:29, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
@Mikeblas: First, I didn't make the claim or the citation, I just corrected the 404. There are about 3,000 articles with that 404 problem, so obviously I am not checking every claim. Even the template correction was not my initiative, it was a talk page request. Having said that, in this case I don't understand the problem. The claim is Top 10 positions were also achieved in ... Slovakia. The citation the template creates is: "ČNS IFPI" (in Slovak). Hitparáda – Radio Top 100 Oficiálna. IFPI Czech Republic. Note: Select 50. týden 2021 in the date selector. Retrieved 5 February 2023. If one clicks the link and selects "50. týden 2021" in the date selector, one can see a peak of #2, verifying the claim. Am I missing something? Muhandes (talk) 14:54, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
Ah! Thanks, I see now. Instructions for reaching the right chart are in the reference. I assumed that they'd be produced by the URL generated by the template, since the template has the date information required to formulate the correct link. I guess it just uses it to produce those instructions, and the user is stuck navigating the page manually. -- mikeblas (talk) 16:01, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
@Mikeblas: Indeed, that's exactly how the template works. You can use the direct link, but not through the template. I actually suggested incorporating it into the template, but there wasn't any interest, so it was never implemented. Feel free to restart the discussion at the template's talk page. Muhandes (talk) 16:53, 30 September 2024 (UTC)