# Talk:Breton Civil War, 1341–1343

This review is transcluded from Talk:Breton Civil War, 1341–1343/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: Gog the Mild (talk · contribs) 17:57, 5 July 2025 (UTC)
Reviewer: Fortuna imperatrix mundi (talk · contribs) 13:13, 8 July 2025 (UTC)
This is right up my rampart; will dispatch an advance guard pres de aussitôt . —Fortuna, imperatrix 13:13, 8 July 2025 (UTC)
Great article, can see only open thing preventing immediate promotion.

Is it well written?
A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct: 
Made a very light copy edit here, rv as required.
Monfont might be a place, but I think it's an improvement on the over-familiar 'John', per MOS:SURNAME which is actually unclear. (But especially as his gang are referred to as Montfortists.)
"The Breton Civil War ground on in a series of petty skirmishes, despite the truce" / "The Breton Civil War continued as a disjointed and inconclusive sequence of sieges, skirmishes and truces", slightly similar.
B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation: 

Is it verifiable with no original research?
A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline: 

B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines: 
Déprez "needs" |orig-year=...
All the journals are peer-reviewed academic journals, and likewise, the books and e-material are published by respected presses and authored by 20th-century experts in the field.
C. It contains no original research: 

D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism: 
Earwig is clear.
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic: 

B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style): 

Is it neutral?
It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each: 

Is it stable?
It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute: 

Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content: 

B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions: 

Overall:
Pass or Fail: 

Passing. —English invasion, of Scotland 14:37, 21 July 2025 (UTC)