# Talk:Let Me Sleep Beside You

This review is transcluded from Talk:Let Me Sleep Beside You/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: K. Peake (talk · contribs) 19:31, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

I'm back from my few days away, so now's the time to start a new review! --K. Peake 19:31, 15 February 2022 (UTC)


### Infobox and lead
Infobox looks good!
The release info should come between the recording and departure sentences
It's acceptable to have it this way (see Aftermath (Rolling Stones album) or even David Bowie (1969 album) which you reviewed). Plus, I find it flows better stating why it appeared on a compilation album first – zmbro (talk) (cont) 03:07, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
Pipe singles to Single (music)
""Let Me Sleep Beside You" displays a" → "the song displays a"
Both done
A celli arrangement is sourced in the body, not strings
Ope – zmbro (talk) (cont) 03:07, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
"The track was rejected by Deram" → "The song was rejected by Deram"
Done
Pipe compilation to Compilation album
That'd be WP:SEAOFBLUE though – zmbro (talk) (cont) 03:07, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
"has seen release on compilations and reissues." → "has seen release on numerous albums." because it has been released on more than one of both
Done
"The song was also featured" → "A remixed version of the song was featured"
"A remixed version" – zmbro (talk) (cont) 03:07, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
The publications part should be the second sentence of the second para instead, also add ones included
But why? – zmbro (talk) (cont) 03:07, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
Done
"entire Toy album as part" → "entire Toy album, as part"
Done
"The remake was positively received." add why it is praised
"Reviewing Toy, Petridis called the remake "great",[30] a sentiment echoed by Pegg, who found it "splendid".[1]" No why presented – zmbro (talk) (cont) 03:07, 22 February 2022 (UTC)


### Background and recording
Img looks good!
Add the release year of his self-titled debut album
Pipe singles to Single (music)
"turned it down but suggested" → "turned an offer down, but suggested"
Remove pipe on single since this should have been done earlier in the para
Above four done
Use something other than for to start the second sentence of the second para, to be less repetitive
Composing? – zmbro (talk) (cont) 03:07, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
Pipe B-side to A-side and B-side
Done


### Composition
Retitle to Composition and lyrics
Done
The celli wikilink leads to a disambiguation page; fix this if it is kept, which I'm not sure of since the lead says strings?
That's awkward – zmbro (talk) (cont) 03:07, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
Pipe chord to Chord (music)
"such as "Let Me Sleep Beside You" and "Be My Wife"" → "such as 'Let Me Sleep Beside You' and 'Be My Wife'"
Both done


### Release and aftermath
Any context for the quote?
"they requested he change" → "they requested that Bowie change"
Done
"The Stones, also a Decca artist," → "The Rolling Stones, also under Decca," since calling a band an artist makes no sense
I don't feel that way but K – zmbro (talk) (cont) 03:07, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
Pipe compilation to Compilation album
WP:SEAOFBLUE again? – zmbro (talk) (cont) 03:07, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
I can't see the source, so I'm asking is it correct to state BBC sessions here when only one is specified or does the source say there was multiple ones?
Fixed
"and argues that it" → "and arguing that it"
"and impersonating Mick Jagger." → "and impersonating Jagger."
"cut of the film but was" → "cut of the film, but was"
"a more folk-inspired version of the track with" → "a more folk-inspired number with" to be less wordy
"called it superior to Bowie's entire debut album and acknowledged its sound" → "called the song superior to Bowie's entire debut album and acknowledged the sound"
Above five done


### Toy version
Replace hlist with bullet points per Template:Infobox song
Sure
"along with other tracks Bowie wrote" → "along with other tracks he wrote"
Wikilink EMI
Both done


### Personnel
Good


### Notes
What warrants the inclusion of note b when that album is not mentioned in the article?
Just a fact – zmbro (talk) (cont) 03:07, 22 February 2022 (UTC)


### References
Copyvio score looks incredible at 14.5%!!!
Pipe Consequence of Sound to Consequence (publication) on ref 16
Done
Wikilink Rolling Stone on ref 20
Done
MOS:CAPS issues with ref 29, unless that is how Toy can be stylized
I find that's how the website sometimes stylizes it even though I've never seen anyone else do it like that – zmbro (talk) (cont) 03:07, 22 February 2022 (UTC)


#### Sources
Good


### External links
Good


### Final comments and verdict
 On hold until all of the issues are fixed; smooth article so far! --K. Peake 09:50, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
Thanks for reviewing Kyle. Have a busy weekend ahead so I can't get to this til Tuesday at the least just so you're aware. – zmbro (talk) (cont) 16:37, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
Kyle Peake Queries above – zmbro (talk) (cont) 03:07, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
Zmbro  Pass now, no problems in the areas where you asked questions and your reasoning for not implementing anything is acceptable! --K. Peake 10:31, 23 February 2022 (UTC)

Anyone able to translate this Good article into other languages? ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:11, 15 June 2025 (UTC)