# Talk:Fernão Pires de Andrade

GA review (see here for criteria)
It is reasonably well written:
Pass no problems there.
It is factually accurate and verifiable:
Pass though I would recommend getting more sources if the article is to be improved any further. It looks like all of the information comes from 10 or so sources, and A- or FA- class articles usually have several dozen. I would recommend adding more sources so that the article's neutrality cannot be called into question. Also I would recommend adding external links to the references; if the books don't have their own websites, then a source like amazon.com will do.
It is broad in its coverage:
Pass The article is very strong in this respect.
It follows the neutral point of view policy:
Pass no problems there.
It is stable:
Pass no problems there.
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate:
Pass plenty of images.
Overall:
The article is very well written and extensive. It is definately GA quality. -Ed! (talk) 22:44, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
Awesome! Thanks. I'm glad you liked the article.--Pericles of AthensTalk 06:27, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Fernão Pires de Andrade. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20021121214356/http://88.1911encyclopedia.org/P/PO/PORTUGAL.htm to http://88.1911encyclopedia.org/P/PO/PORTUGAL.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:57, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

The UTC 04:40, 24 September 2003 version of this article had been or the UTC 02:05, 21 October 2006 version was translated into Chinese wikipedia --- Ktsquare (talk) 04:46, 14 January 2019 (UTC)