# Talk:Holmium

Some of the text in this entry was rewritten from Los Alamos National Laboratory - Holmium. Additional text was taken directly from the Elements database 20001107 (via dict.org) and from WordNet (r) 1.7 (via dict.org). Data for the table was obtained from the sources listed on the subject page and Wikipedia:WikiProject Elements but was reformatted and converted into SI units.

In the introduction it states that Holmium has the highest magnetic permeability of any element and is there element and therefore is used for the polepieces of the strongest static magnets. It should say highest magnetic saturation moment. It is the moment rather than the permeability that is reason it is used in pole pieces for "strong" synthetic magnets.
In the section Application Also magnetic strengthis a poorly defined quantity, it would be better to use magnetic moment or magnetic saturation moment

@Burzuchius made two edits without edit summaries. One removed a {{dubious}} tag with no comment. The other edit removed a {{failed verification}} tag but left the source in place. I have reverted these changes pending an explanation. Johnjbarton (talk) 16:14, 25 February 2025 (UTC)

@Burzuchius Please do not delete secondary references without comment or discussion. See WP:PSTS. Johnjbarton (talk) 01:09, 27 February 2025 (UTC)

Is it too transient, or is the popular Tik-Tok slang 6-7 fro 'Ho' worth mentioning?
Fustbariclation (talk) 13:58, 18 October 2025 (UTC) Fustbariclation (talk) 13:58, 18 October 2025 (UTC)

You will need a reliable reference that links the element to the meme. It would not be due weight for this article, possibly for the 6-7 (meme) article. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 14:02, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
Scientific articles, such as those about elements, do not mention popular culture references unless they are exceptionally significant and well-documented in reliable sources. Complex/Rational 14:22, 18 October 2025 (UTC)