# Talk:Jaden Schwartz

One user keeps trying to start a new section in the article for Mandi Schwartz using the reasoning that she has received more media coverage than Jaden.  If that is the case, then shouldn't she have her own article?  This article is about Jaden, not his sister, and I believe the information about Mandi should stay in the 'Personal Life' section as it pertains to Jaden.  BurienBomber (talk) 14:01, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

I would say that with the coverage before and after her death, Mandi probably meets the requirements for her own article.  If the material stays in this article, I think it should be in the 'Personal life' section or retitle that to 'Family'.  Canada Hky (talk) 17:09, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
I agree that the info in Jaden's 'Personal life' section is sufficient for this article because this article is about Jaden. On the subject of that section- it should be kept as 'Personal life' so more info can be added in the future such as: spouses, children, personal initiatives/charity work, etc… titling it family seems kinda limiting. On the Mandi separate article topic- I'm not sure she is notable under WP:BIO. Is she receiving coverage just because she's the sister of a high profile NHL draft pick? It's really unfortenuate and sad that she passed away but many people die from cancer and are affected by it in Canada, US, and worldwide each year. And also the question, Is she notable for only one event? arises. Those are really debates if an article is created and AfDed but having her own bio section definitely isn't appropriate for this article.Bhockey10 (talk) 22:27, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
I think the coverage is more than just her illness / being a sister of a high draft pick.  The draft really increased media attention, but the bone marrow drives at Yale and around Saskatchewan were already well under way at that point.  I wouldn't say everyone who dies from cancer merits an article, but maybe one who spurs bone marrow / cord blood drives in two countries is.  There is almost certainly enough coverage in reliable secondary sources to meet the GNG.  Canada Hky (talk) 23:18, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
Yeah that's true. There's coverage from reliable secondary sources and wouldn't be a question. The Gray area is because our culture highly elevates entertainment and sport figures and their close relatives. Culture's notability doesn't have restrictions like Wikipedia. She doesn't fit into any of the notability categories I know of such as athlete, academia, politics, etc... and I don't think she meets the WP:ANYBIO guidelines.  She would definitely have an article if the awareness her story and the marrow drives create and/or largely contribute to a cure for cancer.   Bhockey10 (talk) 01:42, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Jaden Schwartz. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110722075511/http://www.sjhl.ca/page.aspx?page_id=169 to http://www.sjhl.ca/page.aspx?page_id=169
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:35, 17 April 2017 (UTC)