# Talk:Desquamative interstitial pneumonia

This review is transcluded from Talk:Desquamative interstitial pneumonia/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: IntentionallyDense (talk · contribs) 14:18, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: Nub098765 (talk · contribs) 08:55, 20 October 2024 (UTC)

Hey, it's one of those medical articles that never get reviewed! I'll step in for those who won't. Let it be known that I'm not an expert at all, but I'll try my best to understand... this. Nub098765 (talk) 08:55, 20 October 2024 (UTC)

Let me know if you have any questions! IntentionallyDense (talk) 16:53, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
Alright. Time to do this.


### Spotcheck
Source #s are of the Sources section below the sfns.

Source 1 verifies the information it is citing. 
Source 2 ditto. 
Source 4 ditto. 
Source 7 ditto. 
Source 9 ditto. 
Source 11 ditto. 
AGF on the sources I cannot access. Based on the paraphrasing I reviewed, the article stays faithful to the sources. There is no indication of plagiarism or other issues. Nice job. I see nothing wrong with this sourcing.


### Verdict
With a few tweaks to the prose, this article is ready for GA status. The information is well-sourced, accurate, and easy to understand for both medical and non-medical readers. Great job simplifying a complex topic without sacrificing detail! I look forward to seeing the final revisions. I'll put this on hold for, say, one week (but I suspect you won't need that long) to resolve the issues or comment on them. Thanksya, Nub098765 (talk) 06:24, 23 October 2024 (UTC)

@Nub098765 I got back to you on all of your suggestions. Thank you for taking the time to do this review, especially on such a foreign topic as I know medical content is a tough topic. Your prose suggestions are amazing and I envy your writing skills. IntentionallyDense (talk) 20:00, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
Thank you! I envy your skills in the medical field of Wikipedia. Your reasons for rejecting are acceptable, and with another read-over, I see no more errors. also, small caveat in my review, for some reason, with one of the suggestions, I pasted my sentence twice instead of yours once, oops! But you seemed to take it well haha
I think this article is ready to pass GA. Good job, and I wish you luck on your future Wikipedia endeavors! Nub098765 (talk) 22:09, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
Thank you! IntentionallyDense (talk) 22:16, 23 October 2024 (UTC)