# Talk:German submarine U-36 (1936)

This 'good' article has not one, but four pictures. I'm all for illustrating an article's subject, but three out of the four pics are of U-36 at sea and are nearly the same; the fourth is of U-36 being commisioned. The three of U-36 are dated 1936, have very close Bundesarchiv numbers and appear to have been taken on the same day. It looks like somebody on Wikipedia has said "there are a lot of pictures of this boat, lets use them all"!
IMO the third photo ('U-36 during training exercises in 1936') and the 'commisioning' pictures should be kept. The others are needless and excessive decoration. 
What do other editors think?  RASAM (talk) 15:59, 28 March 2012 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on German submarine U-36 (1936). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120516095648/http://ubootwaffe.net/ops/boat.cgi?boat=36 to http://ubootwaffe.net/ops/boat.cgi?boat=36
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:04, 11 January 2017 (UTC)