# Talk:Hair (Lady Gaga song)

Why isn't listed a song, it's been released?

Because this hasnot yet passed notability for songs to have an article. — Legolas (talk2me) 03:45, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
This song has debuted at #9 on the RIANZ chart. (http://www.rianz.org.nz/rianz/chart.asp). Please add to article.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.195.33.79 (talk) 04:47, 24 May 2011 (UTC) 

Why the article says "the first promotional single"? TEOG was released, and AFTER her sales it was released as single. But before, it was a promotional... So, "Hair" is the second single promotional.--NicolásTM (talk) 02:14, 24 May 2011 (UTC)

She sang Hair at the Good Morning America's Summer Concert Series in Central Park. This source explain the performance. Could you add this information ?--Raphael99 (talk) 02:33, 28 May 2011 (UTC)

Sure, gimme some time. — Legolas (talk2me) 07:55, 28 May 2011 (UTC)

It's chart on South Korea. Could someone add it please (Here for the source : http://www.gaonchart.co.kr/main/section/total/list.gaon) ?

Sorry there seems to be no mention of "Hair" in the link. — Legolas (talk2me) 15:03, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
Here, you need to click on "차트 더 보기" in the bottom of the page for see the chart of Hair.--Raphael99 (talk) 19:10, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
I still can't see it. — Legolas (talk2me) 11:47, 11 August 2011 (UTC)

Really?  Has Gaga ever even listened to an Iron Maiden song?  144.118.151.168 (talk) 03:28, 11 August 2011 (UTC)

That's not exactly any of your deduction I hope? It's talking about influences. And if you cannot provide anything substantial regarding the betterment of the article, then please don't post. Wikipedia is not a forum. — Legolas (talk2me) 11:47, 11 August 2011 (UTC)

This is definitely not a disco song.. i just don't understand why this should be disco. it's obvious that it isn't. it has guitar riffs by god. isn't it a bit like everything lady gaga does MUST be dance music? almost every critic noted its rock influences. you can call it electrorock, but why disco? lately i found out that even you and i was supposed to be a dance pop number. well, maybe it's just me, but it's like saying that pj harvey sings, well, dance pop music. wikipedia should be precise, but realistic too. 188.216.150.245 (talk) 15:22, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
Itunes, link 2, link 3, link 4, 
all these links say, its dance, dance-pop, and NOT disco! \
Who agrees that it should look like the infobox on the right? I don't care about whether or not we keep disco, but critics have noted the other two genres at well and they should be included?--Jakeriederer (talk) 23:37, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

Please NEVER add a infobox to an article talk page. — Legolas (talk2me) 06:03, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
Okay then.. Who agrees that it should be electro rock, dance-pop, disco? MULTIPLE sources have noted it being electro rock and dance-pop, so I strongly feel that it should be added--Jakeriederer (talk) 23:24, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

I agree, the genres present in the infobox should be: electro rock and dance-pop. --Christianrxx (talk) 06:37, 15 January 2012 (UTC)Christianrxx
Except E!, all the otherthree sources are unreliable. — Legolas (talk2me) 06:39, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
So have we come to a consensus to change the genres to electro rock and dance pop? --Jakeriederer (talk) 18:55, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

No, the sources listed, except E!, are unreliable and don't list electro-rock or dance-pop. The E! reference does not say anything about dance-pop, rather calling the song a dance-party anthem, which can refer to its original genre as disco also. — Legolas (talk2me) 11:00, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

Can someone explain what makes hair a promo? It's a stand alone commercially available single on all major markets itunes amazon etc. I don't think this is a promo...Szaboci (talk) 16:54, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 9 external links on Hair (Lady Gaga song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110512204613/http://www.vogue.com/magazine/article/lady-gaga-our-lady-of-pop/ to http://www.vogue.com/magazine/article/lady-gaga-our-lady-of-pop/
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=%2Fg%2Fa%2F2011%2F05%2F18%2Fbloomberg1376-LLDQTZ0D9L3501-4EFCR7DG8LOVV0UJ7OSRLOI4VL.DTL
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.nme.com/reviews/lady-gaga/12061
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.vancouversun.com/Lady%2BGaga%2Bputs%2Blatest%2Bsingles%2Bonline%2Baudio/4797565/story.html
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110522114445/http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/showbiz/music-news/2011/05/19/world-reacts-to-new-lady-gaga-album-here-s-our-review-86908-23140877/ to http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/showbiz/music-news/2011/05/19/world-reacts-to-new-lady-gaga-album-here-s-our-review-86908-23140877/
Corrected formatting/usage for http://ca.nielsen.com/content/dam/nielsen/en_ca/documents/pdf/newsletters/billboard_canadian-update/Nielsen%20Music%20Canadian%20Update.pdf
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/06/18/lady-gaga-goes-bald-for-hair_n_879715.html
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.chinapost.com.tw/art/music/2011/07/05/308661/Lady-Gaga.htm
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110518053703/http://itunes.apple.com/us/album/hair-single/id437988761 to https://itunes.apple.com/us/album/hair-single/id437988761
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:15, 8 May 2017 (UTC)