# Talk:España-class battleship

Have just created this article (still a "STUB") based on the Spanish Wikipedia similar article on this class and the thips that formed it. It is my intention to translate and adapt those articles, as well as to provide adequate references and sources. This might take me a couple of weeks. Regards, DPdH (talk) 03:42, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

While I applaud your taking the initiative to create these articles, do be aware that the Spanish articles aren't exactly reliable.  I've made a few changes to the Spanish España page but a lack of time has meant I haven't gotten very far with it.  All the best.  Harlsbottom (talk) 07:35, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:España-class battleship/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Dank (talk · contribs) 00:38, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
Review

The toolbox checks out.
Gibbons is in references and further reading.
Fixed - thanks for reviewing the article, Dan. Parsecboy (talk) 01:02, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
Otherwise:
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose):  b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): 

It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 

It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 

It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 

It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 

Overall:
Pass/Fail: 

Passed. - Dank (push to talk) 00:57, 19 July 2013 (UTC)

Should we change "The España class was a series of three dreadnought battleships built for the Spanish Navy in 1909–1921" to "The España class was a series of three dreadnought battleships built for the Spanish Navy between 1909–1921"? ★★RetroLord★★ 09:14, 19 July 2013 (UTC)

That would be fine, but you'd have to drop the ndash and use "1909 and 1921" instead. Either is fine by me. Parsecboy (talk) 09:49, 19 July 2013 (UTC)

@Parsecboy: Do you know what the article title is for the Our Navy citation? Kees08 (Talk) 06:29, 29 August 2019 (UTC)

It took a bit of digging to find the right edition, but I tracked it down - got the editor's name as well. Parsecboy (talk) 12:00, 29 August 2019 (UTC)