# Talk:Bound (Star Trek: Enterprise)

Image:Bound (ENT episode).jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:56, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

In the home release section, it says that "Terra Prime" was released in the season three DVD box set. Surely the intended wording was that "Bound" was released in the season four set? Chris857 (talk) 23:56, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

Fixed. :) Miyagawa (talk) 11:53, 31 May 2013 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Bound (Star Trek: Enterprise)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Taylor Trescott (talk · contribs) 10:56, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
Going to review this in the next few days. Taylor Trescott - my talk + my edits 10:56, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
Alright, here are my concerns.

Lead: Shouldn't showrunner be one word? Show runner redirects to showrunner.
Production: "she wasn't pleased" "wasn't" -> "was not" per MOS:N'T
Production: "Allan Kroeker was the director of "Bound", he had previously directed two episodes earlier in the season, both "Storm Front" and "Home"." This is a little clunky in its current state. How about "Allen Kroeker, who was the director of "Bound" had previously directed two episodes earlier in the season, both "Storm Front" and "Home"." Also, how come is there a "both" before Storm Front?
Production: "Fortunato said that she the three actresses playing" I think that there is a word missing here.
Production: "While the actresses playing the Orion women were required on all days, Lucking filmed all his scenes on the final day of shooting. The main cabin of the Orion ship was constructed in full specifically for this episode while the bridge was only a single wall as it was only seen on screen as a view-screen background." There is no citation for these sentences at the end. Could you please add one?
Reception: "James Hunt at the website Den of Geek listed" I think these "at the"'s should be replaced with "of the". This isn't required, but it's just how I write it in my episode articles and I've seen it used in FAs (The Joy of Sect, Road to the Multiverse, etc.)
Reception: "gave the "Bound"" The "the" can be dropped.
That's it. Now on hold. Taylor Trescott - my talk + my edits 19:39, 27 September 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for reviewing. I think I've addressed all of those points. Pretty much all as described, with the only one where my edits went further was for the fourth point as I did some sentence reconstruction. Miyagawa (talk) 20:52, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
Thanks, promoted the article to GA. Taylor Trescott - my talk + my edits 00:36, 28 September 2013 (UTC)

Regarding the recent removal of the review from Jamahl Epsicokhan and Michelle Erica Green, they each meet the reliable source test regardless of what you might prefer. The guidelines for where these might fail are here: WP:QUESTIONABLE. Regarding Epsicokhan first, he began to review Star Trek during the Voyager run, at which point he was considered such an authority on the series that he was invited to pitch story ideas for the series in person to the production crew. That is sufficient demonstration of the validity of his opinion. For Green, her authority is granted through the website she reviews for - TrekNation. This was one of only four fan sites linked to from the official Star Trek website, and for a period in the mid 2000s, the news articles from TrekNation actually appeared on the official fan site. These are not unusual review websites to use on Wikipedia, and if you looked, you'd find a great many of the Good Articles in the Star Trek wikiproject use them. Miyagawa (talk) 18:02, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Bound (Star Trek: Enterprise). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120606095033/http://trekweb.com/stories.php?aid=41ce90f2f16c5 to http://www.trekweb.com/stories.php?aid=41ce90f2f16c5
Corrected formatting/usage for http://tv.zap2it.com/tveditorial/tve_main/1%2C1002%2C272%7C94737%7C1%7C%2C00.html
Corrected formatting/usage for http://tv.zap2it.com/tveditorial/tve_main/1%2C1002%2C272%7C94866%7C1%7C%2C00.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:17, 24 April 2017 (UTC)