# Talk:Down Bad (Taylor Swift song)

Okay, this song debuted at #2 on the Hot 100. It clearly has a sort of status amongst other TTPD tracks. Should it have a full article? 63.65.131.178 (talk) 18:52, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Down Bad (Taylor Swift song)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: Ippantekina (talk · contribs) 17:00, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: Agent Squash (talk · contribs) 18:32, 22 August 2024 (UTC)

Hi, @Ippantekina. I'll be reviewing the article in the next few days. It's my first time reviewing for GA so being particularly judicious, but from my first pass it's there or near abouts. Agent Squash 18:32, 22 August 2024 (UTC)


### GA review
Last updated: 07:52, 13 January 2025 (UTC) by Sebbirrrr 
See what the criteria are and what they are not
1) Well-written

 1a) the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct
 1b) it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation
2) Verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check

 2a) it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline
 2b) reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose)
 2c) it contains no original research
 2d) it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism
3) Broad in its coverage

 3a) it addresses the main aspects of the topic
 3b) it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style)
4) Neutral:

 4) Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each
5) Stable:

 5) Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute
6) Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio

 6a) media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content
 6b) media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions
Overall:  Passed


#### Comments:
#### Background and composition
Good usage of the track by track commentary to inform the article, with commentary used to support in a neutral manner. Agent Squash (talk) 20:48, 22 August 2024 (UTC)


#### Critical reception
Passed. Agent Squash (talk) 20:44, 22 August 2024 (UTC)


#### Personnel
Verified from liner notes - passed. Agent Squash (talk) 20:44, 22 August 2024 (UTC)


#### Charts
Passed. Agent Squash (talk) 20:44, 22 August 2024 (UTC)


#### Certification
Passed. Spot checks on sources completed. Agent Squash (talk) 20:44, 22 August 2024 (UTC)


### Verdict
 Passed Well done, this was an excellent, well detailed article to read.Agent Squash (talk) 20:48, 22 August 2024 (UTC)