# Talk:John Madden Football '93


### Reviews
Weekend Warrior (December 1992). "John Madden '93: Bigger and Better". GamePro (41): 141, 142.
Weekend Warrior (December 1992). "Madden Pulls Out an SNES Winner". GamePro (41): 142, 144.
Mellerick, Paul (December 1992). "John Madden Football '93". Mega (3): 32–35.
Staff (December 1992). "John Madden Football '93". Mean Machines Sega (3): 102–104.
Rowley, Carl; Rice, Chris (February 1993). "John Madden Football '93". N-Force (8): 40–42.
Staff (January 1993). "John Madden Football '93 Scores Big". Nintendo Power (44): 30, 31.


### Previews and other material
https://web.archive.org/web/20000303151128/http://videogames.gamespot.com/features/universal/hist_madden/index.html
Staff (November 1992). "PREVIEW; John Madden Football '93". Electronic Gaming Monthly (40): 212.
Dyer, Andy (October 1992). "PREVIEWS; John Madden Football '93". Mega (1): 24.
Staff (November 1992). "PREVIEW; John Madden Football '93". Mean Machines Sega (2): 127.
Weise, Matthew (March 4, 2012). "Looking Glass Studios Interview Series - Audio Podcast 10 - Paul Neurath". Retrieved November 23, 2012. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |Publisher= ignored (|publisher= suggested) (help)
Sterrett, James (May 31, 2000). "Reasons for the Fall: A Post-Mortem On Looking Glass Studios". Through the Looking Glass.
Rundle, Michael (September 3, 2012). "REVIEW: Madden 13 Vs. Madden 93 - Has Video Game Gridiron Actually Improved In 20 Years?". The Huffington Post.
Buchanan, Levi (August 11, 2008). "The Evolution of Madden". IGN.
Loguidice, Bill; Barton, Matt (March 2009). Vintage Games: An Insider Look at the History of Grand Theft Auto, Super Mario, and the Most Influential Games of All Time. Focal Press. ISBN 978-0240811468. [1]
Staff (November 1992). "Software and Hardware News; John Madden Football '93". Mega Drive Advanced Gaming (3): 11.

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of John Madden Football '93's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "gamepro":
From TurboGrafx-16: Blake Snow (2007-05-04). "The 10 Worst-Selling Consoles of All Time". GamePro.com. Archived from the original on 2008-09-05. Retrieved 2007-05-28.
From Thief II: The Metal Age: Brenesal, Barry (April 21, 2000). "Thief II: The Metal Age". GamePro. Retrieved November 14, 2010.
From Thief: The Dark Project: Olafson, Peter (January 1, 2000). "Thief". GamePro. Archived from the original on 2010-02-18. Retrieved July 24, 2009.
From Sega Genesis: Blake Snow (2007-07-30). "The 10 Worst-Selling Handhelds of All Time". GamePro. Archived from the original on 2010-03-23. Retrieved 2010-01-02.
From Destruction Derby: Captain Squideo (November 1995). "Destruction Derby". GamePro (76): 54.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 19:57, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

What about mentioning Championship Edition in the article? Allgame has some stuff on it: http://www.allgame.com/game.php?id=12647 --Mika1h (talk) 15:41, 25 November 2012 (UTC)

That works. I didn't know there was any material on it. Thanks. JimmyBlackwing (talk) 16:16, 25 November 2012 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:John Madden Football '93/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
I'll be reviewing the article over the next few days.  Below you will find the standard GAN criteria, along with a list of issues I have found.  As criteria pass, a  or  will be replaced with a .  Below the criteria you'll see a list of issues I've found.  Feel free to work on them at any time.  I will notify you when I'm done checking over the article.  At that time I'll allow the standard one week for fixes to be made.


### Criteria
GA review (see here for criteria)
Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality: 
B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists: 
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources: 
B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary: 
C. No original research: 
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects: 
B. Focused: 
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias: 
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc: 
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales: 
B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions: 
Overall:
Pass or Fail: 


### Issues found
I found only one issue. Please ensure that all inline references appear in order. For example: [4][1][12] should be [1][4][12]. Once that's done reply here and it'll be an easy pass. Nice work! 

Reviewer: Teancum (talk · contribs) 14:38, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

Many thanks for the review. I could have sworn there was a bot to do ref ordering, but I couldn't remember its name. I just went ahead and did it manually. JimmyBlackwing (talk) 19:24, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
 Passed! --Teancum (talk) 13:53, 8 December 2012 (UTC)

Wasn't Looking Glass Studios always Looking Glass Studios?--2601:194:480:C790:506D:E9B9:FBF0:1676 (talk) 20:35, 29 September 2019 (UTC)

They were Blue Sky Productions until they merged with Lerner Research (developer of Car and Driver) to form Looking Glass Technologies. They then changed the name to Looking Glass Studios sometime around 1997. --Sek-2 (talk) 00:15, 30 September 2019 (UTC)