# Talk:Hubert Pierlot

This review is transcluded from Talk:Hubert Pierlot/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: 3family6 (talk · contribs) 18:47, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors: 
No copyvios detected.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 17:59, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
Didn't find any problems with the prose.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 19:27, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists: 
MOS followed.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 19:27, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. Has an appropriate reference section: 
Citation and reference sections are detailed and well-formatted.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 19:27, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
B. Citations to reliable sources, where necessary: 
Adequate citations to reliable sources. I cannot access the sources right now, so I'm accepting them AGF.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 19:27, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
C. No original research: 
All content and analysis is verifiable.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 19:27, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects: 
Stays focused on major aspects.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 19:27, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
B. Focused: 
Remains focused on the subject.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 19:27, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias: 
Fair, neutral presentation, all analysis is attributed to reliable sources.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 19:27, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc: 
No edit warring or other disruptions since this article was created in 2006.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 17:59, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content: 
All images are licensed for public domain or under Creative Commons.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 17:59, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions: 
Images are highly informative, with appropriate captions.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 17:59, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
Overall: A very good article, should be ready for the FAC process.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 19:27, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
Pass or Fail: 

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Hubert Pierlot. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131225015556/http://archive.dirupo.belgium.be/fr/biographie/hubert-pierlot to http://archive.dirupo.belgium.be/fr/biographie/hubert-pierlot
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:03, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

The first confrontation between the government and the King occurred on 10 May, when the King, against the wishes of the government, left for his military headquarters without addressing the Chamber of Representatives like his father, Albert I, had done in 1914.

Do you mean that his father did, or didn't, address the Chamber? Valetude (talk) 19:48, 3 March 2020 (UTC)