# Talk:Cry On

This review is transcluded from Talk:Cry On/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: MsDusa (talk · contribs) 22:54, 6 August 2021 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, spelling, and grammar):  b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): 

It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):  d (copyvio and plagiarism): 

It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 

It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 

It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 

Overall:
Pass/Fail: 

Production

I figure it's implied that they were a new studio at the time given that it is past tense
Multiple types of control scheme > Multiple control schemes
"The evoking" > "The evocation"
Cancellation and legacy

You could stand to summarize the first quotation.
That's about it.

@MsDusa: Done. --ProtoDrake (talk) 20:31, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
pog - Whadup, it's ya girl, Dusa (talk) 20:32, 22 August 2021 (UTC)