# Talk:Church of Christ Pantocrator, Nesebar

This review is transcluded from Talk:Church of Christ Pantocrator, Nesebar/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: BencherliteTalk 21:56, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

Preliminaries: no dab links, no broken external links.  

GA review (see here for criteria)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose):  b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): 
I made a few minor alterations and delinked a few common words, but otherwise it's good enough for GA
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 
Offline and Bulgarian-language sources accepted in good faith (I ran one through Google Translate and got the gist at least!)
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 
It would be nice to know when the church stopped being used as a church and when it started to become an art gallery, but not essential for GA status
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 

It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 
Personally, I wouldn't have all three images in the lead section as it were, but would have at least one in one or more of the lower sections to space them out a bit.
Overall:
Pass/Fail: 

Good work.  Well done. BencherliteTalk 22:27, 27 January 2011 (UTC)