# Talk:Kill or Be Killed (comics)

Why is "Be" capitalised in the title? I'm asking because it's not capitalised on the comic cover. Schwede66 04:58, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

Per MOS:CT, "The following words should be capitalized in English-language titles: ... Every verb, including forms of to be (Be, Am, Is, Are, Was, Were, Been)" Other sources vary (some capitalize or), but KoBK is also how USA Today did it Argento Surfer (talk) 13:24, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Kill or Be Killed (comics)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Sagecandor (talk · contribs) 01:29, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

Hello, I will read this one over and do a review soon. Sagecandor (talk) 01:29, 10 June 2017 (UTC)


### Successful good article nomination
I am glad to report that this article nomination for good article status has been promoted. This is how the article, as of June 11, 2017, compares against the six good article criteria:

1. Well written?: The writing quality is good enough for good quality. Going forwards, I would recommend making sure your lede section is expanded upon just a wee bit more in order to include info on other sections for example like Critical reception, a couple of sentences of expansion should do the trick just nicely here. The article uses an interesting style of Plot, with Synopsis and then Plot. I've never seen that before, but it works nicely here.
2. Verifiable?: The article makes excellent use of citations to confirm the material in the article all over the place. Accuracy is not a concern as verifiability is made easier for future editors and checkers with the citations.
3. Broad in coverage?: Article scope is broad for its particular topic, which includes publication history, plot, synopsis, reception, good intro which would be better with tiny more, etc. Especially nice Production section.
4. Neutral point of view?: Article appears to be presented in an NPOV manner, not seeming overly critical or overly promotional either way, good job here.
5. Stable? Article is stable, not seeing any problems or ongoing edit wars or big talk page arguments, so no issues there.
6. Images?: One image used in the infobox with a fair use rationale there for its use.
Good job overall ! If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to have it Good article reassessed. Thank you to all of the editors who worked hard to bring it to this status, and congratulations.— Sagecandor (talk) 01:23, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Kill or Be Killed (comics). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20170113053532/http://comicbookroundup.com/comic-books/reviews/image-comics/kill-or-be-killed/1 to http://comicbookroundup.com/comic-books/reviews/image-comics/kill-or-be-killed/1
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:20, 21 December 2017 (UTC)