# Talk:Canning Bridge railway station

This review is transcluded from Talk:Canning Bridge railway station/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: Steelkamp (talk · contribs) 12:46, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: Coldupnorth (talk · contribs) 11:27, 28 July 2025 (UTC)

Hi User:Steelkamp I'll be undertaking a GA review of this article. Thanks. Coldupnorth (talk) 11:27, 28 July 2025 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, spelling, and grammar):  b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): 
Good overall. I made a change to say 'scheduled' as the journey may not always be 7 minutes
Good idea.
It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.
a (reference section):  b (inline citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):  d (copyvio and plagiarism): 
The following two statements need a supporting reference before the article can pass: 1.) "The bus lane was opened on 18 November 1989 by Transport Minister Bob Pearce." 2.)"and awarded the $34 million contract for the design and construction of stage one of the bus transitway in August 2000."
Regarding the first one, I have fixed the date, as I have realised its actually December 1989 and not November 1989. The date is supported by footnote 20 and both the date and the transport minister are supported by footnote 19, which are both at the end of the next sentence. If you want, I can send you a scan of footnote 19 if you email me.
Regarding the second one, footnotes 27 and 28, which are at the end of the paragraph, support that sentence. I can also send you a scan of footnote 28 if you want.
Thanks, those are good, I have just added them at the end of the sentence as well. I see the newspaper is accessible in the State Library so that's fine.
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 
Broad coverage
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 
Some criticism but supported by references; article NPOV neutral
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 
Stable although article may require further updates once improvements are carried out
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 
All fine, I made one minor change to a legend
Overall:
Pass/Fail: 

Article on hold for two missing references. Coldupnorth (talk) 11:53, 28 July 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for taking this review Coldupnorth! I've responded. Steelkamp (talk) 14:22, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
Thank you for responding. Happy to pass this as GA. Overall a well written and referenced article. Coldupnorth (talk) 15:23, 28 July 2025 (UTC)