# Talk:Church of St. Polyeuctus

This review is transcluded from Talk:Church of St. Polyeuctus/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Starting review.Pyrotec (talk) 16:23, 23 June 2009 (UTC)


### Summary
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality: 

B. MoS compliance: 
The WP:lead is quite short, but is just about acceptable.
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources: 
Well referenced.
B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary: 
Well referenced.
C. No original research: 

Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects: 

B. Focused: 

Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias: 

Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc: 

Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales: 

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions: 

Overall:
Pass or Fail: 

I'm going to pass the article as it currently stands. There is some scope for improvement, an expanded WP:lead is possibly the first item that could be addressed; however the article is of sufficient quality to be awarded GA-status. So, congratulations on the quality of the article.Pyrotec (talk) 20:57, 23 June 2009 (UTC)