# Talk:Eugenio Espejo

I am glad to report that this article nominee for good article status has been promoted. This is how the article, as of September 12, 2007, compares against the  six good article criteria:

1. Well written?: Good.
2. Factually accurate?: Good. An impressive number of citations!
3. Broad in coverage?: Good balance between breadth and depth.
4. Neutral point of view?: No problems here.
5. Article stability? No problems here.
6. Images?: No problems here.
If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to a GA review. Thank you to all of the editors who worked hard to bring it to this status, and congratulations. 
Excellent article! King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:10, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose):  b (MoS): 
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
a (fair representation):  b (all significant views): 
It is stable.

It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
a (tagged and captioned):  b lack of images (does not in itself exclude GA):  c (non-free images have fair use rationales): 
Overall:
a Pass/Fail: 
King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:10, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Eugenio Espejo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070703174112/http://www.conmemoracionescivicas.gov.ec/obras/reflexionesespejo.pdf to http://www.conmemoracionescivicas.gov.ec/obras/reflexionesespejo.pdf
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061015223357/http://www.conmemoracionescivicas.gov.ec/obras/vototogado.pdf to http://www.conmemoracionescivicas.gov.ec/obras/vototogado.pdf
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120306203818/http://www.ivic.gob.ve/estudio_de_la_ciencia/Earlyhistory.pdf to http://www.ivic.gob.ve/estudio_de_la_ciencia/Earlyhistory.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:04, 27 December 2017 (UTC)