# Talk:K-156 (Kansas highway)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on K-156 (Kansas highway). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060215233840/http://www.us-highways.com/usbt.htm to http://www.us-highways.com/usbt.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:41, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:K-156 (Kansas highway)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Raymie (talk · contribs) 03:16, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, spelling, and grammar):  b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): 
I tweaked one sentence that was quite awkward and did not quite match the article tonally, on traffic counts. Also, WP:USRD/STDS suggests that links for US highways that are piped be in the form "US 55", not "US-55" (i.e. no hyphen), which I've changed.
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):  d (copyvio and plagiarism): 
Mentioned this on your user talk, but please clip newspaper citations when you can and use {{cite news}}. I would have required you to do it if I had not done it already. Earwig tool brings up very little close paraphrasing aside from a low-quality content farm page, copying the article, that can be tossed.
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 

It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 
Editor is substantially the only contributor since August.
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 

Overall:
Pass/Fail: 

@Raymie: You are right that  most states there is no hyphen. But in Kansas, the road articles use them as shown in the infobox. 420Traveler (talk) 05:22, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
@420Traveler: Is there a particular reason for this? I would not have known myself, it's not mentioned in the relevant standard, and it's not current KDOT practice, though I do now see it on other Kansas pages. Perhaps this is worth mentioning to the WikiProject to figure out if this should be continued. Raymie (t • c) 07:18, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
 @Raymie: Im not exactly sure of the reasoning, just that it was KDOT practice. That would be a good idea to mention it there, so we can get input from others.420Traveler (talk) 13:57, 8 October 2020 (UTC) All it says on Wikipedia:Naming conventions (U.S. state and territory highways) in the notes is that "Hyphenation varies by state at this time" but it doesnt say what states. 420Traveler (talk) 14:13, 8 October 2020 (UTC)