# Talk:Federal Reserve Bank Building (Seattle)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Federal Reserve Bank Building (Seattle)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Eteethan (talk · contribs) 20:47, 25 January 2016 (UTC)


### Criteria
### Review
Well-written:

Verifiable with no original research:

Broad in its coverage:

Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.

Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.

Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:


#### Result
#### Discussion
Please add any related discussion here.

I have upload a non-free image (File:Seattle Federal Reserve Building development rendering.jpg) of the proposed skyscraper development. Please reconsider your image review to include the new non-free image. SounderBruce 04:49, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
Ok. I just checked it and it should be fine. I will try to get this review done today. Eteethan(talk) 12:07, 2 February 2016 (UTC)


### Additional notes
Who determined it was Streamline Moderne?  It doesn't look anything like Streamline Moderne. 209.137.134.50 (talk) 15:30, 16 February 2016 (UTC) 2/16/2016

@209.137.134.50: My mistake. I meant to link to Moderne architecture (which currently redirects to Streamline Moderne), which is referenced by the GSA and HistoryLink, but it does not have an article anymore. I've changed all references to the style to "Modernist". SounderBruce 19:37, 16 February 2016 (UTC)