# Talk:Graudenz-class cruiser

This review is transcluded from Talk:Graudenz class cruiser/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Buggie111 (talk · contribs) 00:21, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
Happy New Year, Nate! Let's check this baby out ...:)


### Criteria
### Review
Well-written:

Both fixed. Parsecboy (talk) 13:11, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
Verifiable with no original research:

Broad in its coverage:

No exact dates in Groner or Conways, or anywhere else I've seen. Also nothing specific on the mine hit, just the reference in Campbell to that being why she wasn't at Jutland. Foreign service records are pretty slim as well. Parsecboy (talk) 13:11, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.

Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.

Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:

Unfortunately not - I searched through the old naval annuals and such and couldn't even find a line-drawing. I suppose fair use would be acceptable at this point. Parsecboy (talk) 13:11, 1 January 2012 (UTC)


#### Result
#### Discussion
Please add any related discussion here.


### Additional Notes