# Talk:Girlfight

This review is transcluded from Talk:Girlfight/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Casliber (talk · contribs) 11:31, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

Right, I'll copyedit as I go (please revert any inadvertent changes to meaning I make) and jot queries below: Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 11:31, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
The film was well received by critics - hyphen?
I'm always unsure whether hyphens are appropriate in places like these, but I've added one now.
Diana later goes to Hector's birthday party, but leaves when she sees Adrian acting close with his ex-girlfriend. -"acting close"? odd expression...you mean like "canoodling" or "getting (overly) friendly" or something...there must be a better expression.....
Changed to "getting friendly".
Is there anything about it paving the way for other films like it? Also, any sources mention that it was a springboard for Kusama and Rodriguez to go onto successful careers? Be nice to mention somewhere...
I added a "Legacy" section to the article. I addressed all of these points but unfortunately it's a bit brief since I wasn't able to find too much to discuss from the sources.
Perfect - exactly what I was thinking - something that gives its place in film lore/history. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:42, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
1. Well written?:

Prose quality:  - two queries above...
Manual of Style compliance: 
2. Factually accurate and verifiable?:

References to sources: 
Citations to reliable sources, where required: 
No original research: 
3. Broad in coverage?:

Major aspects: 
Focused: 
4. Reflects a neutral point of view?:

Fair representation without bias: 
5. Reasonably stable?

No edit wars, etc. (Vandalism does not count against GA): 
6. Illustrated by images, when possible and appropriate?:

Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales: 
Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions: 

Overall: 

Pass or Fail:  a couple of queries but nice article and nearly there....Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 11:41, 23 December 2014 (UTC) nice Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:42, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
@Casliber: Thanks for the review, Cas, and sorry it took me a few days to address the comments you made (my replies are above). Tomorrow I'm going away for a week so if you have any more suggestions I'd appreciate if you can keep the review on hold until then. Thanks! 97198 (talk) 11:49, 26 December 2014 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Girlfight. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141214234821/http://bombmagazine.org/article/2337/ to http://bombmagazine.org/article/2337/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:12, 2 January 2018 (UTC)