# Talk:Cri-Zelda Brits

This review is transcluded from Talk:Cri-Zelda Brits/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: -- BigDom 19:49, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose):  b (MoS): 
Prose and grammar are both OK.
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 
Practically all citations are to CricketArchive or Cricinfo so the referencing is fine.
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 
Covers every major point of her cricketing career. Lacks any biographical information, which is a problem in a biography article but not enough of a problem to fail. I understand there is very little coverage of women's cricket compared to the men's version of the sport.
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 

It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 
There aren't any images, but this isn't a reason to fail.
Overall:
Pass/Fail: 
Definitely comprehensive enough for GA status.


### Additional comments
No "Personal life" section or any biographical info?
Women's cricket get's little press coverage; there is simply no information out there (at least not from reliable sources) on her life.  It is possible there is stuff in back issues of South African papers, but not that I can find recorded online, and living in England, I certainly don't have access to them.  I feel that the article does however 'address the main aspects of the topic' as required by WP:GACR.  She isn't notable for her personal life, and while it would be nice to have more information in there (and we might get it during the 2010 ICC Women's World Twenty20, but we might not), I don't think it is particularly necessary?
I agree that it isn't enough of a problem to fail the article.
It says she was born in Rustenburg in the infobox, but this isn't included in the body of the article.
Done: added at start of early life.
Are there definitely no images available? If not, it isn't the end of the world.
None on flickr, I have a few taken last year of the South Africans, but no good identifiable ones of her at all.  Kicking myself over that! If South Africa women tour England with her in the squad again, I'll get one, but until then, I'll have to hope someone else snaps one around the world somewhere! Harrias talk 09:49, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
Well, images aren't essential but they are nice to have, that's all. BigDom 09:55, 6 April 2010 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Cri-Zelda Brits. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20161123180030/http://stats.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/records/individual/list_captains.html?class=9%3Bid%3D3379%3Btype%3Dteam to http://stats.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/records/individual/list_captains.html?class=9%3Bid%3D3379%3Btype%3Dteam
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150912043517/http://stats.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/records/individual/list_captains.html?class=10%3Bid%3D3379%3Btype%3Dteam to http://stats.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/records/individual/list_captains.html?class=10%3Bid%3D3379%3Btype%3Dteam
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:31, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

It has been a while since this article has been reviewed, so I took a look and noticed that it hasn't been updated post-2010, even though she has been playing professionally at that time. Should this go to WP:GAR? Z1720 (talk) 00:42, 11 November 2025 (UTC)