# Talk:Mama (Spice Girls song)

Image:Spice19.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 22:08, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

The image Image:Wdytya-ukcd.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here.  In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page.  Please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
That this article is linked to from the image description page.
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --01:14, 5 November 2008 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Mama (Spice Girls song)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Adabow (talk · contribs) 10:04, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

The article is nearly at GA standards. I will place the review on hold for a week, awaiting improvements.
Thank you for reviwing the article, and sorry for the late reply. Frcm1988 (talk) 05:03, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality: 

B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists: 

Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources: 
nearly
B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary: 

C. No original research: 

Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects: 

B. Focused: 

Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias: 

Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc: 

Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales: 

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions: 

Overall:
Pass or Fail: 

Can you put quote marks around the quote in the 'Writing and inspiration' section?
That paragraph is a block quote, and according to Wikipedia:MOSQUOTE: Do not enclose block quotations in quotation marks and especially avoid decorative quotation marks in normal use. Frcm1988 (talk) 05:03, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
I copy-edited the 'Composition' section
*This section needs consistency in its tense
Then a choir, arranged by Mark Beswick,[5] supplemented the group during the last part of the song,[2] which consists in the repetition of the chorus until it gradually fades out. reads terribly
Reworded. Frcm1988 (talk) 05:03, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
'Music video' section: "though none of the group's members grew up together" needs a source
There is no explicit source that mention this, but there is a segment on one of their official books called First Impressions where each of them talk how they met and what they thought about the other girls when they first met. I could add that as a source. Frcm1988 (talk) 05:03, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
Please do. Adabow (talk · contribs) 05:22, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
Added source. Frcm1988 (talk) 17:49, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
'Live performances' section: "All five girls standed together" → All five girls stood together
Corrected Frcm1988 (talk) 05:03, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
Credits and personnel - these should be in alphabetical order
I believe this is always written in order of importance, first the artist, then the producers, then the technical staff, other musicians and artwork. I placed them in the order that appers on the album. I can't find a guideline for songs but the personnel section in the Wikipedia:WikiProject Albums don't mention anything about this. Frcm1988 (talk) 05:03, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
OK, I suppose it's up to you. Adabow (talk · contribs) 05:22, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
'Charts, peaks and certifications' should simply be 'Charts and certifications'
Replaced. Frcm1988 (talk) 05:03, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
Notes - for the books, wikilink to their entry in the 'References section'. See Wikipedia:Citing sources/Further considerations#Wikilinks to full references for more on this.
That is one style of inline citation, I used this one through the other Spice Girls articles for consistency with the style that was already there. Frcm1988 (talk) 05:03, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
Also make sure that you have given the correct publisher, especially the Hung Medien pages (ie Belgian, Dutch, Australian, New Zealand etc charts). Hung Medien publishes these pages, interpreting them from the chart provider. However, the chart provider should be omitted.
But those organizations are the original publishers, Hung Medien only have the permission to reproduce the charts on the website. Frcm1988 (talk) 05:03, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
Yes, those organisations originally published the charts, but Hung Medien compiled the charting positions each week for the one song. If it were a mirror of the original chart then the chart organisations would need to be credited, but not here. Adabow (talk · contribs) 05:22, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
I putted Hung Medien as the work, but kept the organizations as the publishers. Frcm1988 (talk) 17:49, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
I still think that it is not technically correct, but as other reviewers have let it go in other SG songs, I suppose it's more of a FA thing. The article is otherwise quite well-written, so I'm happy to pass it now. Adabow (talk · contribs) 19:29, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
Breadth - fine
NPOV - yes
Stable - yes
Media - good job

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Mama (Spice Girls song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110718134159/http://uk.music.yahoo.com/read/review/12062573 to http://uk.music.yahoo.com/read/review/12062573
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.comicrelief.com/what_we_do/campaigns/red_nose_day/97
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:21, 24 May 2017 (UTC)