# Talk:Fantastic Four: Rise of the Silver Surfer

I think it should be added into the article. He makes appearance trying to get into wedding, but is told that he is not in the list and is forced out.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.134.9.138 (talk) 21:04, 9 October 2011 (UTC) 

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Fantastic Four: Rise of the Silver Surfer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081007050733/http://uk.rottentomatoes.com/news/1648425/washington_waits_for_andquotfantastic_fourandquot_final_cut to http://uk.rottentomatoes.com/news/1648425/washington_waits_for_andquotfantastic_fourandquot_final_cut
Added {{dead link}} tag to https://m.cinemascore.com
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070930192342/http://www.eonline.com/news/article/index.jsp?uuid=5d62d671-e3a9-4684-b5bb-85bb8eec9a7c&entry=index to http://www.eonline.com/news/article/index.jsp?uuid=5d62d671-e3a9-4684-b5bb-85bb8eec9a7c&entry=index
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.darkhorizons.com/news07/mcmahon.php
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071228202451/http://blog.meevee.com:80/my_weblog/2007/04/meevee_exclusiv_2.html to http://blog.meevee.com/my_weblog/2007/04/meevee_exclusiv_2.html
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071110192108/http://www.f4movies.com/interviews/582.shtml to http://www.f4movies.com/interviews/582.shtml
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.variety.com/article/VR1118007959?refCatId=13
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:17, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Fantastic Four: Rise of the Silver Surfer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100531070941/http://www.goldentrailer.com/awards.gta9.php to http://www.goldentrailer.com/awards.gta9.php
Corrected formatting/usage for http://blog.meevee.com/my_weblog/2007/04/meevee_exclusiv_2.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:04, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Fantastic Four: Rise of the Silver Surfer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://archive.is/20140929214609/http://www.pemberton.ca/residents/municipal-services/licences-and-permits/filming-in-pemberton to http://www.pemberton.ca/residents/municipal-services/licences-and-permits/filming-in-pemberton
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:04, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Fantastic Four: Rise of the Silver Surfer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.celebrity-gossip.net/celebrities/hollywood/jessica-alba-mothers-her-co-stars-does-nascar-200863/
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://moviesblog.mtv.com/2007/09/10/jessica-alba-ready-to-be-a-super-mommy-in-fantastic-four3/
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080323103957/http://moviesblog.mtv.com/2008/03/20/fantastic-four-3-probably-not-happening-reveals-chris-evans/ to http://moviesblog.mtv.com/2008/03/20/fantastic-four-3-probably-not-happening-reveals-chris-evans/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:17, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

Is a box office of $301.9 million with a budget of $120–130 million considered a "moderate success at the box office"? Shouldn't that be just enough to break even in most cases? (without taking into account the dvd sales because the article is referring to just the box office) Tinnitus13 (talk) 21:33, 22 November 2023 (UTC)

MOS:FILMBOXOFFICE Any claims of success should be based on reliable sources saying it. This seems like yet another case of editors doing their own research and making claims that are not directly supported by sources. Some editors forget that studios only get to keep about half the box office gross (theaters have to get paid too) and other costs such as marketing can be substantial. Unfortunately this sort of over-simplified optimistic reasoning is rash across many older Wikipedia film articles.  According to The-Numbers.com it grossed 2.4x times the production budget[1] which as the above poster mentioned is more in line with break even than success, as Hollywood generally aims for at least a 2.5x multiplier. They're supposed to be in the profit business, not the break even business. If it was really a success they'd have made a third film. -- 109.79.71.203 (talk) 00:14, 10 August 2025 (UTC)