# Talk:Dead Letters (Millennium)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Dead Letters (Millennium)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: --Gen. Quon (talk) 16:34, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose):  b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): 
No mention of production in lead
So I assume there are no viewership numbers available for this episode?

It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 

It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 

It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 

It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 
Surely there's some sort of picture out there? Also, why not upload a screenshot of the episode during the climax, or the critically lauded beginning scene?

Overall:
Pass/Fail: 

On hold for 7 days to straighten the issues out.--Gen. Quon (talk) 16:47, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
I've amended the lead and bunged in a picture. As for viewer numbers, I don't have them directly. I can reliably source the rating to the Genge book, but she gives nothing more than the rating. However, I've been wondering that since this season ran in the same year as The X-Files (season 4), the number of viewers represented by a ratings point will be the same as is listed in Andy Meisler's book dealing with that season, I could work out the viewer numbers based on that. I'm going to raise the issue on WP:RSN to be sure it's not considered OR to combine sources like this but I'm leaning towards thinking it should be alright. GRAPPLE X 15:49, 1 March 2012 (UTC)