# Talk:Cream Holdings Ltd v Banerjee

Useful, particularly in the infobox. However:

Many were added right into the middle of sentences.
Many were added before full stops rather than after, also wrong.
Some were added to the lead; the lead should either be cite-free or cite-full. The method used here is cite-free; sticking the article in a middle ground simply ensures it doesn't comply with either acceptable standard.
The references being used are problematic. The judgments are massive; you're giving a 135-page EWCA judgment as a source and going "there you go, you can find it in there - if you look hard enough", which makes it technically verifiable (although not really, since they're unnecessary) but practically annoying for the reader.Ironholds (talk) 23:07, 26 October 2010 (UTC)