# Talk:Lucy Heartfilia

This review is transcluded from Talk:Lucy Heartfilia/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contribs) 09:22, 12 April 2018 (UTC)

This might take up to a week, but I'll try to finish this quickly. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 09:22, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
Some preliminary comments: I didn't find any copyright violations, and all links are currently working. More comments to follow in the next few days. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 10:29, 14 April 2018 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Sorry for the late review, as real-life stuff caught up with me. Here's the review.
Is it well written?
A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct: 
Is there a way to make the Reception section more concise? Per WP:WEIGHT it seems way too long compared to the rest of the article; some trimming might be necessary here. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 04:45, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation: 

Is it verifiable with no original research?
A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline: 

B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines: 

C. It contains no original research: 

D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism: 

Is it broad in its coverage?
A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic: 
See 1a. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 04:45, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style): 
See 1a. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 04:45, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
Is it neutral?
It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each: 
Is there any Japanese discussion about her character? It's fine if there isn't any, but this needs to be clarified first. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 04:45, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
Is it stable?
It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute: 

Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content: 

B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions: 

Overall:
Pass or Fail: 
Nomination on hold pending responses to my questions. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 04:45, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
@Narutolovehinata5: Hello and thank you for providing the review. I trimmed the "Reception" section and made the first two paragraphs (which are the longer ones) approximately equal in size. I hope it is all right now. Regarding the Japanese discussion about Lucy's character, all I managed to find was an interview with Aya Hirano — Lucy's Japanese voice actress — written in Japanese, and I added what Hirano said about Lucy to the "Creation and conception" section. Flowerpiep (talk) 20:03, 24 April 2018 (UTC)Flowerpiep

The reception section is still a bit too long; perhaps it could be made more concise here. My suggestion is, if possible, it could be reduced to about three paragraphs (right now it's four paragraphs long). Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 00:05, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
@Narutolovehinata5: I organised the "Reception" section in three paragraphs and tried to trim it further. Flowerpiep (talk) 23:20, 1 May 2018 (UTC)Flowerpiep
I'm sorry for the late reply, and I apologize if this GAN has taken so long, but I think there are no more problems with the article, and raised issues have been addressed. As such, I am happy to say that this is a pass. @Flowerpiep:, I suggest you nominate this article over at WP:DYK for the chance for it to be featured on the main page. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 00:24, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

Fairy tale symbol.svg
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 06:25, 20 March 2023 (UTC)