# Talk:Constantine (Briton)

I have merged the articles on Constantine of Dumnonia with Constantine III of Britain, which essentially repeated each other's sometimes innacurrate information. I have also moved them both to this title, since the only historical reference to the king doesn't call him "Constantine of Dumnonia, but "Damnonia", which is possibly a significant distinction. And not even Geoffrey of Monmouth calls his derivative figure "Constantine III of Britain". There may be a better title, but this is my suggestion.--Cúchullain t/c 20:00, 6 January 2010 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Constantine (Briton). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100426183445/http://www.mun.ca/mst/heroicage/issues/2/ha2rh.htm to https://www.mun.ca/mst/heroicage/issues/2/ha2rh.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:44, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Constantine (Briton)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: SpartaN (talk · contribs) 07:25, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
Will start soon. Hopefully later today, probably Friday. SpartaN (talk) 07:25, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
Images are good, it's factually accurate and verifiable, definitely broad, represents different view points on the subject, and is stable. I do have a few prose suggestions:

"Cultus" - should be in italics, because it's Latin.
"A number of other traditions attested across Britain describe saints or kings name Constantine, suggesting a confusion and conflation of various figures." - does it mean to say the traditions "describing saints or kings named Constantine"?
"The church in Govan in present-day Scotland was also dedicated to a Saint Constantine." - should be "The church in Govan, a parish in present-day Scotland, was also dedicated to a Saint Constantine." Looks better than "..in Govan in.."
Good work. I thought I had work today and didn't. Plus, I happen to be familiar with Geoffrey and some of the other sources so that saved some time. The article was in pretty good shape, and I had to really nitpick here. There were a few places that word order looked odd, but I think it's just me. The prose will pass after you do the above. SpartaN (talk) 08:42, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

All taken care of, thanks SpartaN. Anything else that you see?--Cúchullain t/c 15:41, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
Looks good. Passing now. SpartaN (talk) 16:22, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

Yo!
What is up y'all? I thought my edit that was reverted as per this page added, as I specified some context to the point of confusion. I honestly thought it was self evidently helpful.
That said I have real problems with syntax, etc as I have severe Aspergers Syndrome *and* severe ADHD lol (oof!) and would love toget help with such with specific things I am doing at the time.
Ugh I realise I am struggling to make sense here...all that said, sufficed to say, I relly honestly thought my change was really helpful and didnt need specific referencing. But I guess, after all this time Im still learning the ropes ha!
Thanks for your time and I'll post this with a few tweaks to the docs page as well, a wee bit later on. 
✌🏼 ΤΕΡΡΑΣΙΔΙΩΣ(Ταλκ) 03:09, 14 June 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for your edit, which I reverted. As I wrote in my edit summary, you changed referenced text, and thus made the author say things which he or she did not say. You say that Gildas was born in the Clyde Valley, but this is rejected by most modern scholars. Dudley Miles (talk) 08:22, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
"didnt need specific referencing" In Wikipedia, there is no such thing as not requiring a specific reference. If any aspect of an article can be challenged, it is going to be challenged. Anyway, I don't see how your medical condition is relevant to a content dispute. This is not your first major edit to an article, is it? Dimadick (talk) 14:37, 15 June 2024 (UTC)