# Talk:Mini Metro (video game)

SUBWAY MAP SIMULATOR LETS PEOPLE PLAY URBAN PLANNER
Doing lines: Subway-builder Mini Metro is coming to iOS & Android
Could You Run WMATA? Try the 'Mini Metro' Game
(Versão alpha gratuita de Mini Metro é disponibilizada) Free alpha version is available Mini Metro
This Addictive New Game Lets You Build Your Own Subway System
Is Mini Metro the Next Angry Birds?
Minimalistic subway layout game allows you to be a virtual transit tycoon
New app lets you design your own subway system
London Tube-style map shows how Dublin public transport will link up
Addictive game lets you play subway god, weep at your inefficient creation
  Tentinator   21:57, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

Optimise the tube with Mini Metro map game
Playing Mini Metro, the Supremely Addicting Subway Game
Mini Metro makes you enjoy designing subways. Seriously
  Tentinator   20:58, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Mini Metro (video game)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Tintor2 (talk · contribs) 02:18, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
Hello, I, Tintor2 will review this article. It looks to be in good shape, so I'll probably pass it after seeing issues solved. Here we go:

Can the lead be expanded to be split in at least two paragraphs per WP:Lead? The article is pretty so I think it would be easy.
I've expanded this.
Gameplay section: What does "In the Normal play mode"? Is it a diffculty?
It's the name of a game mode. I've added quote marks to emphasise that. The text explains how "Normal" differs from the "Endless" game mode. Tell me if it still isn't clear.
Reception: The vg reviews template could be expanded with the ones you used in the prose like "| rev1       = | rev1Score  = "
The other reviews didn't give scores.
The excellence in audio could also be added with "| award1Pub  = | award1     = "
I don't like to use the award entry in the VG reviews template because the text looks too small and cramped. So I prefer to just summarise in prose if there aren't that many awards. That's just my personal preference.
Lastly, just an advice. If the development section is too large, I would recommend it to have a subsection.
Usually I would split the development section into subsections, but for this article it seemed better to write it in a chronological order due to the way the game was released. So there isn't really clearly defined subsections for it.
That's all I could gather. Looks like a solid GA. Also if you have some free time could you take a look at my latest peer review?
Cheers.Tintor2 (talk) 02:18, 11 August 2016 (UTC)

@Tintor2: I've addressed your comments above. Anything else need to be changed? --The1337gamer (talk) 21:32, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
Congratulations. Article became a GA.Tintor2 (talk) 21:39, 12 August 2016 (UTC)