# Talk:Honey (Fighting Vipers)

Should an image of Honey's appearance in Sonic the Fighters be added for illustrative purposes? Seems like it would be a reasonable inclusion, akin to the various Eggman designs in use on that page. -- Cyberlink420 (talk) 02:04, 10 May 2025 (UTC)

I was thinking that, the problem is avoid warping the article layout was a concern. I've been a bit sidetracked lately between work and helping out with another character article on here for now while I wait for some books to arrive.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 02:35, 10 May 2025 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Honey (Fighting Vipers)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: Kung Fu Man (talk · contribs) 03:19, 27 May 2025 (UTC)
Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 16:29, 21 June 2025 (UTC)

Will begin soon... Jaguar (talk) 16:29, 21 June 2025 (UTC)

Lead
"to be a rich young girl and a cute counterpart to the game's" - I can't help but feel 'cute' is unencyclopaedic, but I'll leave it to you
"particularly cosplay, with stores selling replicas of her cosplay" - repetition. Perhaps costume works better
Body
"After this was decided, they considered other elements aspects to tie to the characters" - doesn't read well; elemental aspects?
"...such as skateboarding and guitars, elements they felt would be popular with younger players" - repetition of 'elements' again
"Game director Hiroshi Kataoka acknowledged" - 'game' is necessary here
"that while the character's design was a departure from characters normally designed by AM2" - repetition, try replacing the latter with those
"The sexualization of the character has received some criticism however." - missing comma
Overall it's in good shape, I enjoyed reading it. I have one of the games for the Saturn, Megamix I think. Once the above are dealt with I'll be happy to promote.  Jaguar (talk) 21:44, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

Everything should be fixed, with the "cute" bit I put it in quotes because it's an actual term the devs used towards her in that regard, so that should solidify that a bit more. Lemme know if there's anything else!--Kung Fu Man (talk) 04:17, 23 June 2025 (UTC)
Thank you for addressing all the points. This article is good on all counts, so let's get the promoted.  Jaguar (talk) 08:49, 23 June 2025 (UTC)