# Talk:Isidore van Kinsbergen

This article is now a Good article on the English Wikipedia. The only suggestions for improvements I have are:

To include more Interwiki-links in the paragraphs and sentences
Possibly to extent on his biography
However the article is still excellent as it is but could be made that little better with the above done! For everyone who has helped edit this article and put time into working on it - Excellent work!!!!!Tellyaddict 13:17, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the review. I agree absolutely 100% with your improvement suggestions. The only problem with this person's biography is that his source is really rare. — Indon (reply) — 18:12, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

This discussion is transcluded from Talk:Isidore van Kinsbergen/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.
Starting GA reassessment as part of the GA Sweeps process. Jezhotwells (talk) 19:11, 16 July 2009 (UTC)


### Checking against GA criteria
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): 

b (MoS): 
Lead could be longer
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): 
The whole artcile relies on three sources, can no more be found?
b (citations to reliable sources): 

c (OR): 

It is broad in its scope.
a (major aspects): 

b (focused): 

It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars etc.: 

It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): 

b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 

Overall:
Pass/Fail: 
I will pass this but improvements could be made. Jezhotwells (talk) 19:18, 16 July 2009 (UTC)