# Talk:Credit Suisse

Removed "of Monkey Business fame", this refers to the book Monkey Business : Swinging Through the Wall Street Jungle by John Rolfe, Peter Troob, it may be mentioned in a separate article about "DLJ". - Jerryseinfeld 22:47, 21 Nov 2004 (UTC)

In the German version the name of the company is Credit Suisse AG. Credit Suisse search on Swiss commercial registers agrees with it. Any advice, thx, --YB ✍ 16:36, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

Then we may replace occurences of Credit Suisse Group by Credit Suisse AG and it would be a good idea to also change the title to Credit Suisse Group because it is an affiliated group. It would be interesting to list the members of the group (Credit Suisse Funds AG, Credit Suisse Group AG, Credit Suisse Trust AG...). --YB ✍ 16:38, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
Since no one disagree, I will modify the article. Thanks for your collaboration. --YB ✍ 22:44, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
I wrote the bulk of the article, but it was so long ago I don't remember the details of corporate structure/naming. However, I think we usually title articles based on how the person/org is commonly known as, or how they prefer to call themselves, as oppose to their technical legal name. So the method of decision-making would be to establish what high-quality secondary sources typically call them and then make any clarifications in article-space (I think). user:Crisco 1492 is a bit of an article-naming expert and may be able to provide more confident guidance. I've never had much interest in article-naming debates. CorporateM (Talk) 00:02, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
That's right, we expect articles to be under the commonly known name, rather than their legal names etc. Now, comparing "Credit Suisse AG" and "Credit Suisse" is difficult because one would necessarily include the other. We'd have to focus on what the RSes use to refer to the company. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:30, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
Just doing a quick search in The New York Times, which I think many of us consider to be one of the more reliable of the prolific news publications, all the articles just refer to it as "Credit Suisse", so I think the current article-title is correct. However, if it's not in there already, a Corporate structure-type section should clarify the difference between AG and Group and the divisions you referred to above, even if a primary source is necessary. If German-language sources show a preference for a different name, it may actually be optimal for different language Wikis to use slightly different titles. CorporateM (Talk) 00:41, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Naming conventions (companies) seems to confirm that the title is correct, but the article should specify the official name of the company. --YB ✍ 00:48, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
The following two links are refering to the relevant information for this: Legal structure, Credit Suisse Group announces plan to evolve its legal entity structure --Albinfo (talk) 22:10, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
After the acquisition, Credit Suisse Group AG was merged into UBS Group AG and UBS Group AG now owns Credit Suisse AG. Does it mean Credit Suisse Group AG ceased to exist, and should the name be changed to Credit Suisse AG? Concisepleonasm (talk) 19:08, 14 June 2023 (UTC)

According to the CS page linked in the 2023 thread below ("Credit Suisse Group AG was struck off the commercial register, and all assets and liabilities of Credit Suisse Group AG passed to UBS Group AG") as well as the link you provided, yes, although let's be aware that a simple search-and-replace is insufficient. The word "Group" is used in more than just the lead sentence. — JohnFromPinckney (talk / edits) 05:57, 15 June 2023 (UTC)

A corrupt Korean money manager takes down a half trillion Swiss institution.
Couldn’t happen to a more deserving country of stuck up snobs. Jackspratt8888 (talk) 20:32, 13 July 2024 (UTC)

https://www.swissinfo.ch/eng/banking-fintech/credit-suisse-no-longer-exists-as-legal-entity-in-switzerland/82373288
https://www.ubs.com/ch/en/microsites/ubs-acquisition-of-credit-suisse.html
https://www.ubs.com/global/en/media/display-page-ndp/en-20240701-sbm.html
I think we need to change the tense of this article? I can see there's a comment saying "changed the “was” to “is”, it still exists, just as a subsidiary of UBS." but I'm really not sure that's still true? At what point would we consider Credit Suisse to no longer exist? Timtjtim (talk) 14:45, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

It has been a while since this article was reviewed, so I took a look and noticed uncited statements, including entire paragraphs. Should this article go to WP:GAR? Z1720 (talk) 00:37, 11 November 2025 (UTC)