# Talk:Off the Air (TV series)

Hey, everybody. I was just on the official Off The Air Facebook page & we exchanged a couple comments back & fourth. But, one of the comments I got from them was "Look for MOLTAR in Season 3". I have no idea if we should put this on the page or not because I'm not sure if it's enough info even though someone involved with the show runs the page. Go ahead & discuss it below & lets try to make a decision about this. --SaturnPhoenix (talk) 23:46, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

Could someone define the phrase "DVR Theater block"? The meaning is not obvious.
66.172.110.244 (talk) 12:14, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Off the Air (TV series)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Bentvfan54321 (talk · contribs) 00:00, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
I'll take this one. I hope to have some comments within 2-4 days or so. --Bentvfan54321 (talk) 00:00, 4 September 2014 (UTC)


### Source review
The only dead links are the ones that are tagged as such. While it is not absolutely required for GA, I recommend trying to find archived copies of the urls or finding a different source.
The only archived copy for the "Animals" episode is archived at archive.today, which is blacklisted for some profoundly stupid reason. 23W (stalk)
I'm uncomfortable with Son of the Bronx per WP:BLOGS. Pucci's posts on TV Media Insights are okay; however, Pucci's blog has recently come under fire for copyright violations. I recommend either finding another source for the claims or seeing if Pucci posted the same thing on TV Media Insights.
Removed and replaced. 23W (stalk)


### Lead
"...the series remains relatively unknown" What exactly is unknown? Is it the status of the series? Its plot? The fact that it exists?
It's status on the network, yeah. Added this in. 23W (stalk) 02:10, 5 September 2014 (UTC)


### Synopsis
This looks good, but it seems awfully short as it is technically only one single sentence. Is there any way to expand that at all?
I've struggled with this one. To me, it's pretty self-evident; in the Juxtapoz article, Hughes states that not much else can describe it: "But, in my own words, Off the Air is essentially a visual mixtape that really doesn't need any clear explanation, right?" 23W (stalk) 02:10, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
I'll try to look at the Production and Broadcast and Reception sections soon. --Bentvfan54321 (talk) 01:39, 5 September 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for taking this! 23W (stalk) 02:10, 5 September 2014 (UTC)


### Second round
Per Template:Infobox television#Attributes, which states "An image with the title logo of the show does not need a caption", I'd remove the caption from the infobox.
The show doesn't have a title logo. That's just one of the posters they use to brand their show online. 23W (stalk)
"...after producing a video mixtape that would that would be projected..." remove the second "that would"
Oops! Fixed. 23W (stalk)
The Dup detector shows that the second sentence of the lead is verbatim to text some of the text in ref 8. Rephrase that.
It seems they've copied from this article, as evidenced by this lone ref link (#cite_note-Miami_New_Times-1), which is used normally in Wikipedia, but not for their website. 23W (stalk)
Are some of the links in ref 12 the same? That appears to be the case, they are just different archived copies of the same article.
Fixed; I got one of the titles wrong. All the citations give different URLs, and I checked the archive URLs and they all correspond with the main link. 23W (stalk)
Those are the only outstanding issues I can find. The prose looks good, the article is adequately sourced, and the quotes are well-placed. Fix these minor issues, and I'll pass the article. --Bentvfan54321 (talk) 22:37, 5 September 2014 (UTC)

@Bentvfan54321: Thanks for your review! How does it look now? 23W (stalk) 23:05, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
@23W: Ok, I didn't see that the ref had copied text from a previous version of this article. Looks great, passing now, though if you want this to have a shot at FAC, those dead links will probably have to be resolved one way or another. If you're up to it, do you mind reviewing one of my nominations? --Bentvfan54321 (talk) 23:43, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
I don't think those links are ever coming back, but I don't think the FA process forbids them (unless I'm mistaken). Thanks again, and will do! 23W (stalk) 23:46, 5 September 2014 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Off the Air (TV series). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/cooks-creator-reveals-6-sources-748534
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 03:30, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Off the Air (TV series). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130603070556/http://www.tvmediainsights.com/highlights/14572/adultswim-ratings-scorecard-week-of-october-29-2012/ to http://www.tvmediainsights.com/highlights/14572/adultswim-ratings-scorecard-week-of-october-29-2012/
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131015214052/http://www.tvmediainsights.com/tvratings/32391/adultswim-ratings-scorecard-week-of-september-30-2013 to http://www.tvmediainsights.com/tvratings/32391/adultswim-ratings-scorecard-week-of-september-30-2013/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:56, 12 May 2017 (UTC)