# Talk:Lolicon

Hi I wonder if the image is appropriate here in the sense that it does not depict the object of the article, but the sexualised object ? Nattes à chat (talk) 08:14, 23 September 2024 (UTC)

I find it a bit gratuitous myself. Pretty much any picture of a young female child from anime would get the point across. The picture of three scantily-clad prepubescent girls is overkill.Emiya1980 (talk) 07:46, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
It is completely and totally appropriate. 2600:8806:919C:6100:E56C:EFD2:D689:FE74 (talk) 18:51, 17 March 2025 (UTC)
I ”completely and totally” disagree. Emiya1980 (talk) 20:40, 17 March 2025 (UTC)
The image has already been deemed appropriate for the article on two separate occasions in the past. A non-sexual image making you personally uncomfortable is not reason enough to censor or remove it. 2600:8806:919C:6100:9489:FB14:BB68:7AC1 (talk) 19:14, 16 April 2025 (UTC)

The redirect Cunny has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 March 24 § Cunny until a consensus is reached.  Valorrr (talk) 21:56, 24 March 2025 (UTC)

The use of Category:Pedophilia on this article considered offensive and defamatory as lolisho is not considered pedophilic, and I would like to see it removed from the article as such category is considered extremely charged in this context.
Disclaimer: Like most people I condemn pedophilia, and any claims to the contrary are considered highly defamatory and are therefore reportable to site administration. AbleistSL (talk) 14:08, 14 May 2025 (UTC)

Do you always announce which categories you add or remove in an article's talk page? Volunteer editors do not typically ask for permission. Dimadick (talk) 17:03, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
I can't edit it because the page is protected, someone else will have to do it. Disregard my last post I was confused by a notice on the site, I will make the edit myself. AbleistSL (talk) 20:46, 15 May 2025 (UTC)

We should remove the revealing images on this page.  Ykwue (talk) 20:34, 2 August 2025 (UTC)

This image has been discussing lots of time on wiki commons, the consensus there, only for reference, is not revealing. -Lemonaka 07:48, 20 August 2025 (UTC)

In recent months a recent major controversy regarding lolishota has been significant relevance regarding recent practices of "censorship" regarding the credit-card companies mastercard, visa, as well as online transaction companies in general such as paypal on sites such as pixiv and many hentai, anime and video-game platforms, should this not also be deserving of a mention in the article considering how impactful it was/still is? 209.227.175.102 (talk) 11:21, 27 September 2025 (UTC)

It doesn’t really seem that impactful to the genre as a whole. A brief mention would suffice. ShyGuyFalls (talk) 01:48, 11 November 2025 (UTC)