# Talk:Fader Bergström

This review is transcluded from Talk:Fader Bergström/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: K. Peake (talk · contribs) 07:13, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

I will review this one today! --K. Peake 07:13, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

Thank you so much! Chiswick Chap (talk) 08:50, 17 June 2022 (UTC)


### Infobox and lead
Infobox looks good!
Thanks.
Remove the best-known and best-loved songs part, as that is not sourced
Done.
Add a sentence ending the lead about the reception/legacy of the composition
Done.


### Context
Good
Thanks.


### Song
#### Music and verse form
Add relevant text to the audio sample to justify usage
Added.
Pipe 3/4 time to Triple metre
Done.


#### Lyrics
Pipe Fredman to Jean Fredman
Done.


### Reception
Retitle to Reception and legacy
Done.
"before the Chancellor of Justice. Fortunately" → "before the Chancellor of Justice and fortunately,"
^* Done.

Are you sure unbridled is an appropriate term here?
Said 'unrestrained' instead. Means the same thing.
Pipe street-girls to Prostitution
Done.
Add the release year of Glimmande nymf
Added.
Imgs look good!!
Thanks.


### References
Copyvio score looks quite good at 31.5%!
Noted.
Should ref 13 be cited in place of ref 8 since it includes p. 149?
Merged refs.
Remove or replace ref 16 per WP:RSPYT
Removed.


### Sources
Wikilink as Albert Bonniers Förlag instead
Done.


### External links
Good
Thanks.


### Final comments and verdict
 On hold until all of the issues are fixed! --K. Peake 07:36, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Done all those, thanks for the review. Chiswick Chap (talk) 09:01, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Chiswick Chap Nice work on this, but you still need to fix the Chanceller prose in reception since those sentences are too short to be on their own. --K. Peake 20:47, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Done. Chiswick Chap (talk) 21:17, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

 Pass now, thanks for fixing everything so quickly! --K. Peake 07:02, 18 June 2022 (UTC)