# Talk:Lady Gaga Live at Roseland Ballroom

Lady Gaga brings signature over-the-top style, familiar hits to Roseland Ballroom’s final shows
Lady Gaga performs at closing Roseland Ballroom
*Lady Gaga Performs at Closing Roseland Ballroom

Lady Gaga plays it short, but sweet
— Status (talk · contribs) 06:18, 29 March 2014 (UTC)

ABC and Washington Post are identical reviews, though. XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 06:56, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
Other reviews and content expansion:

http://www.business-standard.com/article/pti-stories/lady-gaga-s-birthday-outfit-a-nude-dress-114032900201_1.html
http://newyork.cbslocal.com/2014/03/28/lady-gaga-takes-stage-for-first-of-7-night-run-to-close-out-roseland-ballroom/
http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/world-news/lady-gaga-plays-it-short-but-sweet-30137367.html
http://www.myfoxny.com/story/25105589/lada-gaga-concerts-mark-roselands-final-nights
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/03/28/arts/music/taxi-dancers-to-gaga-roselands-life-and-death.html
http://923now.cbslocal.com/2014/03/26/lady-gaga-talks-about-her-wild-violent-nights-at-roseland-ballroom/
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/03/31/arts/music/on-stage-lady-gagas-artistry-endures.html
http://www.forbes.com/sites/jesselawrence/2014/03/31/lady-gaga-tickets-for-roseland-are-below-avg-prices-for-rest-of-artpop-ball-tour/
—Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 07:02, 29 March 2014 (UTC)

Belfast Telegraph and Courier are also identical. XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 07:11, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
Some more reviews:

[1]
[2]
— Status (talk · contribs) 19:17, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
@IndianBio: I don't have access to this in full, what does it say? XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 04:00, 30 March 2014 (UTC)

You want me to add the content? I thought you did already. —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 04:12, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
I could only add a limited amount due to subscription issues. If you could give more detail on what the review says, that'd be great. XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 04:14, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
Actually I will be expanding the critical response section soon, don't worry I will incorporate the contents. —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 04:25, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
I look forward to what you'll do :D XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 04:27, 30 March 2014 (UTC)

Can this list be treated like a film plot or a TV show summary in that once the concert happens... that becomes the source for the set list? The set list hasn't changed yet, so the line about it only being for the first show doesn't seem necessary to me. Gloss • talk 03:06, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

I would say wait until she is known to have performed them in different orders on different nights. XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 04:09, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
Wait until what? There perhaps can be a note saying "any combination of these songs have been performed on the tour, listed here in the order of performances from her first show" or something along those lines. The way it currently is said makes it seem like she only performed that set list on the first night. Gloss • talk 04:31, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
I was suggesting we wait for info on different setlists to become available if not already, but if it's current state suggests only a one-night performance, then go ahead and remove that bit. I would include a source for it either way. XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 04:37, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
I agree with XXSNUGGUMSXX. The purpose of such a statement is to stop the set list section from being overcrowed with any little change an artist does to the set list. If there are no changes, obviously it isn't needed and can be removed. But as of yet, we don't know that. — Status (talk · contribs) 19:58, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

IndianBio I could be wrong on this, but shouldn't we have the boxscores/attendance count before nominating for GA? XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 06:45, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

Actually that is not exactly a part of this article I believe. I have a big hunch that they are going to add the Boxscore to the ArtRave tickets and then release it to Billboard. Its been almost over a month since the performances ended. They would have released the sales if not holding back for the tour. —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 06:47, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
Looks like we've got some waiting to do for those sales. Article just seems incomplete without them. In any case, I'm happy to help fix up this article per whatever the reviewer asks. Best of luck getting another GA! XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 06:51, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
Thanks dear. We have to anyways explain this scenario with the reviewer then if he/she asks. —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 06:53, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

IndianBio Aren't references needed to support this content, or do film plot guidelines apply here too? — prism △ 17:32, 20 June 2014 (UTC)

"Film plot guidelines" apply here too. — Status (talk · contribs) 19:40, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
Is there any guideline about this? — prism △ 19:53, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
No specific guidelines for tour articles have been created. So therefore the generic synopsis guidelines apply. — Status (talk · contribs) 20:00, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
Essentially any live appearance or a media which is shown in front of 10,000s of people would not need reference for summarizing what it is about. Unless we are explicitly mentioning any particular fact about it, like "Gaga while performing a song, said to the crowd 'I love NY'" or something like that. —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 03:13, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Lady Gaga Live at Roseland Ballroom. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140329094241/http://www.thecourier.co.uk/news/international/lady-gaga-plays-it-short-but-sweet-1.292249 to http://www.thecourier.co.uk/news/international/lady-gaga-plays-it-short-but-sweet-1.292249
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:20, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Lady Gaga Live at Roseland Ballroom. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140408215907/http://style.mtv.com/2014/03/31/lady-gaga-roseland-ballroom-wardrobe/ to http://style.mtv.com/2014/03/31/lady-gaga-roseland-ballroom-wardrobe/
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140408225732/http://blogs.villagevoice.com/music/2014/04/lady_gaga_rosland_ballroom.php to http://blogs.villagevoice.com/music/2014/04/lady_gaga_rosland_ballroom.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:29, 15 December 2017 (UTC)