# Talk:Foramen spinosum

This review is transcluded from Talk:Foramen spinosum/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Sahara4u (talk · contribs) 03:27, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
Comments

 Done Lead section may be expanded a little. Usually, a paragraph of more than three line ts recommended, merge the two para.
Fleshed out.--LT910001 (talk) 04:38, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
 Not done History section should come before Structure.
Thanks, the relevant guideline for this article is WP:MEDMOS#Anatomy. For Anatomy articles and medicine-related articles in general, history is recommended as coming after structure.--LT910001 (talk) 04:38, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
 Done Images need alt text.
Thanks for pointing this out, alternate text is a great way to make articles more accessible that I previously wasn't aware of. I'm not sure if my browser is able to view them, so if I haven't done it correctly please let me know.--LT910001 (talk) 04:38, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
 Done Place "Additional images" before References
Done, and removed one image. --LT910001 (talk) 04:38, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
—Zia Khan 03:34, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for your comments and taking up this review, I hope we can work together to get this promoted. --LT910001 (talk) 04:38, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for taking up this review, Sahara4u, I feel I have addressed your concerns. Do you have any additional concerns regarding promotion to GA status? LT910001 (talk) 12:59, 5 February 2014 (UTC)


### Assessment
GA review (see Wikipedia:Good article criteria and WP:GACN)
Well-written.
a (clear and concise prose which doesn't violate copyright laws, grammar and spelling are correct):  b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, and fiction: 

Factually accurate and verifiable.
a (well referenced):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (Wikipedia:No original research): 

Broad in its coverage.
a (covers major aspects):  b (well focused): 

Neutral .
Fair representation, no bias: 

Stable.
No edit wars nor disputed contents: 

Illustrated appropriately by images.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 

Conclusion: Good work with the article. Keep it up! —Zia Khan 23:25, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
Pass/Fail: