# Talk:Emily Brontë

I don't understand the statement that Wuthering Heights was two parts of a three part novel, the last part being Agnes Gray. Agnes Gray was written by Anne Bronte, not Emily Bronte, so needless to say, this is a very confusing statement.
Just to clarify: Wuthering Heights was published with Agnes Grey (even though they are by two of the sisters, not one) in a 3 volume set by Thomas Cautley Newby in 1847. I presume the contributer means that Agnes Grey occupied only the last of the 3 volumes, whilst WH occupied the first 2 vols. I've changed the word 'part' for 'volume' and 'book' for 'set' and added that AG was by Anne. Is that a bit clearer?

This 'Dave the Monkey' isn't true, is it? "Her favorite stuffed toy, Dave the Monkey, was interred with her, but was subsequently removed and placed in the Haworth Parsonage museum." QueenStupid 03:39, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

I greatly doubt a victorian child would have named a toy 'Dave'. It's a rather modern name. MichaelKeefe 09:26, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
EncyMind (talk) 23:17, 22 June 2011 (UTC) I don't know whether it is true, but I can speak to whether a toy at that time could be called "Dave" by using a Thomas Jefferson example.  He was known as Tom Jefferson by his friends and family.  He had a pet mockingbird named Dick.  I think we consider names like Tom, Dick and Dave as modern when they truly are not.

Just curious-This article says Charlotte edited Wuthering Heights and then published it as a stand-alone novel. Does anyone know how extensively she edited, and can the original publications be found anywhere? J'aimeOlivier 18:55, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

As far as I know Charlotte just simplified Joseph's dialect for non-Yorkshire readers and took out some swear words. Today's editions, however, are usually based on Emily's original text.--87.162.183.14 (talk) 12:12, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
There are far more changes than just to Joseph's dialect. One that I specifically remember reading about was when Cathy Snr was dying, and she referred to her soul and its 'inhabitants'. When Charlotte edited the book, she changed this to read 'inhabitant', but it was specifically written as a plural to show the connection between Heathcliff and Cathy. KillerKat (talk) 18:45, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
Are you sure that was not just one of the famous typos made by the sloppy editors which were corrected by Charlotte who must have known Emilys original work? We cannot be sure as the handwritten manuscript of WH is lost. The passage reads: "To be sure, one might have doubted, after the wayward and impatient existence she had led, whether she merited a haven of peace at last. One might doubt in seasons of cold reflection; but not then, in the presence of her corpse. It asserted its own tranquillity, which seemed a pledge of equal quiet to its former inhabitant." and it is Nelly Dean who is talking, not Catherine. As Nelly is a conventional Christian, she would have said that each living body has only one soul inside.
Anyway, it is true that some expressions were edited by Charlotte as well: Emily wrote "Gimmerton kirk" which Charlotte changed into "Gimmerton churchyard", Hindley was originally called "the desperate being" and later "the desperate man" and so on. All in all, however, Charlotte did not interfere with the actual content of the book. And today one can decide whether one wants to buy Emily's original text (minus typos) or Charlottes edition (the publishers' notes normally tell you which edition was used.) PS: Don't get me wrong - it may well be that Emily wanted to have a plural and Charlotte only thought it to be a typo (though I think that is unlikely). Still, all we have is theories and interpretations.--87.162.187.239 (talk) 06:02, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
It wasn't actually my theory; it was listed in the notes that accompanied my version of the book: the Penguin Classics edition. KillerKat (talk) 22:49, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
Well, then it is the personal interpretation/theory of the Penguin editor which cannot be taken for certain and is not beyond criticism by other scholars. They won't have asked Charlotte or Emily, will they?;-) So what we do know is: in the first edition incl. "Agnes Grey" there is said to have been a plural form, in later editions we find the singular (even in today's editions which use Emily's original text).The rest is open to interpretation.--87.162.195.232 (talk) 05:23, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

I once read a foreword that described Emily Bronte's strength. The words "stoic" and "defiant" were in there. It described an incident in which she'd been bitten by a rabid dog and cauterized the wound herself. No one knew until someone saw the scars. Maybe we can mention this trait in her bio? I don't have the book anymore and can't find a good source on the net.  24.211.249.43 05:33, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
Could it be Winifrid Gerins biography, titled 'Emily Bronte' ?

This is mentioned in my version (which I'm in the middle of reading). It's the Penguin Classics version with extra notes in the back. It's mentioned on page 342, referring to page 49. "She did not yell out: Catherine's courage is reminiscent of Emily's own fearlessness with dogs. In one incident, later immortalized by Charlotte in Shirley, Emily used a 'red-hot Italian iron' to cauterize a wound she sustained from a dog suspected of having rabies. In another, she disciplined her dog Keeper, well-known for his 'ferocity of nature', by delivering a savage beating with her bare hands before then comforting the chastened animal. (Elizabeth Gaskell, The Life of Charlotte Bronte, pp. 184-5.)"
I don't know how you'd reference that! KillerKat (talk) 04:06, 3 September 2008 (UTC)

It's not that harsh is it? Yorkshire weather is drier than Lancashire, for example. Is there any evidence for "the harsh local climate at home and at school"? Why school particularly? Just how localized are we being here?--Shantavira|feed me 08:53, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
"Emily's health, like her sisters', had been weakened by the harsh local climate at home and at school. She caught a cold during the funeral of her brother in September, which led to tuberculosis." These sentences are unsatisfactory for multiple reasons: "weakened health" is an imprecise term, the idea that bad weather causes illness is not true, the idea that a cold can lead to tuberculosis is not true, and the sentences are unreferenced.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.54.20.51 (talk) 14:49, 4 August 2009 (UTC) 
im reading wuthering heights right now. it is a barnes and noble classic and the introduction is by daphne merkin. in chapter VI, mrs dean tells of how heathcliff returned without ms cathy. he tells her about how the dog attacked her ankle and she remain until morning. here is where you will find a footnote, and in the back of the book it explains about how emily bronte herse;f was attacked by a dog when she was younger. i hope thats what you were looking for.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kylax02h (talk • contribs) 19:01, 29 July 2008 (UTC) 

Recently the file File:Emily Brontë by Patrick Branwell Brontë restored.jpg (right) was uploaded and it appears to be relevant to this article and not currently used by it. If you're interested and think it would be a useful addition, please feel free to include it. Dcoetzee 06:51, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

I have been to Haworth in the late summer.  Storms come suddenly over the moors and are quite violent.
What many don't realize about the conditions under which they lived is that they lived in the parsonage, right next to the graveyard.  Decaying flesh perked downwards, contaminating the drinking supply - they were on wells, of course.  Tuberculosis, typhus and a host of other diseases spread easily in these unsanitary conditions.  Whatever disease a person died from went directly into the drinking water.
They lived in a stone home that was quite drafty.  There was no central heating.  There were no fans to circulate heat from the fireplace around the rooms.  Most rooms did not have fireplaces.  Winters are harsh on the moors, and, I can assure you the Bronte sisters knew bone-chilling cold.
They also lived during and after the Year Without a Summer.  The effects of that weather anomaly were felt for quite some time, both environmentally and economically.
EncyMind (talk) 23:13, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
Tuberculosis, typhus, and hosts of other diseases do NOT spread to living humans from corpses. They certainly would NOT infect humans after the body decayed and leaked into the water system. TB, in particular, has to be contracted through the air. Bacteria die quickly when their host dies  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.194.51.226 (talk) 23:28, 28 July 2018 (UTC) 

Recently, a user not familiar with the writing and analysis of Brontë's work deleted all images showing the moors and Haworth, believing them to be decorative only and having no literary or encyclopedic value.
For those unfamiliar with the importance of literary motifs and, specifically, the use of them in Brontë's work, here is a nice introductory discussion of Wuthering Heights that examines some of them:
http://www.shmoop.com/wuthering-heights/symbolism-imagery.html
In addition, here is a Google Scholar search for Emily Brontë + moors.  You will have to wade through the numerous citations for journal articles on the importance of the moors in her life and character development, but it is standard fare in Brontë scholarship.  No discussion of her life or work would be complete without it.
http://scholar.google.com/scholar?start=10&q=%22Emily+Bronte%22+%22moors%22&hl=en&as_sdt=0,39
Others have mentioned the problem of grave seepage and the health of the family and villagers.  I will be working on this to provide good citations.  Yes, it was true.  The seepage of rotting flesh went directly into the water supply, so, any diseases that the decaying corpses had that survived the putrefaction process would enter the water supply.  Several of the deleted images showed the graveyard and the Brontë parsonage.  Unless you have been to Haworth, you cannot appreciate how close the graves were to the home - their well would have been immediately contaminated as the microbes perced downward.  In these unsanitary conditions, death was prevalent, as can clearly be evidenced within the Brontë family itself.  I will enter this information, but not until I have the proper citations to verify the facts.
The Brontë's found the village oppressive.  The stench of decaying flesh was pervasive.  The grit and filth of 19th century life clung to the buildings (most of which have been cleaned in the 20th century).  To escape that oppressiveness, they took to the surrounding moors and valleys.  These figured prominently in all of their writing - "place" becoming personified as characters.  Unfortunately, the Wikimedia Commons images were all deleted by the user who is unfamiliar with literary motifs and devices and Brontë scholarship itself.
EncyMind (talk) 16:06, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

I've reverted and removed the quote boxes. Aside from displaying not well, (very thin!), they're better suited for the Wuthering Heights page instead of Bronte's biography, imo. Please discuss before edit warring. Truthkeeper88 (talk) 18:38, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

Really, Truthkeeper.  Male authors have important quotes from their works.  Look at the Keats entry.  Those are two of the most famous quotes from her work.  What is going on here? Would someone tell me how many images are allowed for female authors?  Clearly, it is not the same for the male authors.  EncyMind (talk) 19:01, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
It has nothing to do with male/female. I'm a woman and wrote the Hemingway page - with quote boxes. Personally I like them; lots of people don't. I took down this one because it's not well formatted, but that can be fixed. I'd rather see more scholarly content added to the page to expand it a bit, and then re-add quote-boxes if warranted. Truthkeeper88 (talk) 19:13, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Regarding the images - it's an question of policy. You might want to read WP:MOSIM - the longer the page, the more images it can hold. Other things, such as relevance to the text, whether or not the image is free content, are all taken into consideration. These things happen and it's best to try to work them out by discussing them. I'll keep an eye on the discussion. Truthkeeper88 (talk) 19:17, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

At the time of typing, hasn't there been a recent story discovered by Bronte that was written in French? If this information is accurate and can be sourced, it would help to update the article if it could be added to it. ACEOREVIVED (talk) 09:24, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

There was this recently about Charlotte which you may be thinking of. Keith D (talk) 13:48, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

"Emily Bronte" -Brontë About 7,030,000 results
"Emily Brontë" -Bronte About 6,650,000 results
Surprisingly close, closer than Charlotte Bronte, but the WP:COMMONNAME is still "Emily Bronte" without the accent and should be moved according to WP:DIACRITICS. In ictu oculi (talk) 17:37, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

There is no need for discussion on this, this is just a marker applying the exercise frequently applied to foreigners' names to a native English person's name. In ictu oculi (talk) 10:10, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

Hi. Here is some interesting information about Emily:

If you think that the sources are acceptable/reliable enough, it would be nice to somehow use this information in the main article. Cheers. ~ Daniel Tomé (talk) 22:20, 7 February 2013 (UTC)

Although some of these characterisations are observable in other sources, perhaps these here are more interesting in terms of how Emily was perceived in the second half of the 19th century, rather than as definitive observations of fact. They do not strike an appearance of being scholarly studies - for example in the first source are also listed various bits of domestic advice, such as "A housekeeper who has made a study of economical comfort in her home has found after long experience that it is not the fullness of hair mattresses which adds to their comfort, so much as close tufting." PaleCloudedWhite (talk) 23:14, 7 February 2013 (UTC)

Catching a cold and coming down with tuberculosis are now seen as quite different afflictions. Citations would be good to establish whether tuberculosis was diagnosed at the time or inferred much later. Sminthopsis84 (talk) 14:25, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

I just added the reference. Thanks. ~ Daniel Tomé (talk) 14:42, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
The sources then mention "consumption", but it is the same as tuberculosis. ~ DanielTom (talk) 09:33, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

Here is another story about Emily and her dog:

Source: John Cordy Jeaffreson, Novels and novelists: from Elizabeth to Victoria (p. 292), published in 1858. ~ Daniel Tomé (talk) 17:07, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

I've found a source for the pronunciation of the surname Brontë, from Merriam Webster's Encyclopedia of Literature. To quote from the Explanatory Notes:

"When our research shows that an author's pronunciation of his or her name differs from common usage, the author's pronunciation is listed first, and the descriptor commonly precedes the more familiar pronunciation."
The book then goes on to list BronTEE as the author's pronunciation, but commonly pronounced by others as BronTAY.
This source is available on Google Books, so anyone can check it online. DORC (talk) 18:11, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Emily Brontë/CommentsTalk:Emily Brontë/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
Last edited at 21:10, 28 April 2008 (UTC).
Substituted at 14:26, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

When this article talks about Bronte being the third of the four surviving Bronte siblings, it could mention that the eldest of the Bronte siblings was Charlotte. Vorbee (talk) 15:15, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

do you know the meaning of daguerrotype?
the image of Constantin Heger is a portrait, oil of canvas, not photo.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.119.228.108 (talk) 17:14, 1 November 2020 (UTC) 

There is conflict since one of them states that the father removed them after their death and the other says that he removed them before Elizabeth died "Elizabeth died soon after their return home

Emily, Charlotte and Elizabeth were subsequently removed from the school in June 1825. Elizabeth died soon after their return home.
Charlotte maintained that...After the deaths of his older daughters, Patrick removed Charlotte and Emily from the school
To fix this issue I have deleted the first mention of Elizabeth dying after they got home since this includes no citation, in contrast with the second statement. If there is an error please reverse and correct me. DO PLEASE HOWEVER NOTIFY ME PREFERABLY. Chefs-kiss (talk) 23:27, 7 August 2021 (UTC)

Catherine Bush CBE (born 30 July 1958) is an English singer, songwriter, record producer and dancer who topped the UK Singles Chart for four weeks with her debut single "Wuthering Heights", 70.171.84.217 (talk) 19:22, 17 February 2023 (UTC)

Under the "early life" section, you guys have the wrong Arthur Wellesley linked. The one you have linked was born after Emily died and is not the correct son mentioned in the article. 2600:1700:BC01:9B0:D063:E8B3:8633:55B (talk) 00:29, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

Fixed. Thank you. Jean-de-Nivelle (talk) 09:30, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

Hi! I was asked by @ArthurTheGardener to give an assessment of this page. Here's what I've got (corrections in red, suggestions in indigo):

Right now, I think the lead is too short. Per MOS:INTRO, you want to "summarize the most important points covered in an article, in such a way that it can stand on its own as a concise version of the article". For an article of this length (~3000 words), I think you want your lead to be at least 3-4 paragraphs.
...only four of whom survived into adulthood.
Link curate?
The family lived on Market Street in Thornton, a village on the outskirts of Bradford, in the West Riding of Yorkshire. Their house is now known as the Brontë Birthplace.
I would generally try to adhere to WP:LQUOTE, but if not, it should be consistent throughout the article.
Despite their lack of formal education, Emily and her siblings had access to a wide range of published material. Favourites included Sir Walter Scott, Lord Byron, Percy Bysshe Shelley, and Blackwood's Magazine.
Also, given MOS:TIES, should this not omit the serial comma? Unsure precisely how this works as an American. In any case, use of the serial comma should be consistent throughout the article. I see some cases where it is used and some where it isn't.
Inspired by a box of toy soldiers Branwell had received as a gift...—Which Branwell is this? Elizabeth?
...which they set in a invented imaginary worlds populated by their soldiers as well as their real-life heroes, the Duke of Wellington and his sons, Charles and Arthur Wellesley.
Initially, all four children shared in the creation of stories about a world called Angria.—Citation needed.
However, When Emily was 13, she and Anne withdrew from participation in the Angria story and began a new one about Gondal, a fictional island whose myths and legends preoccupied the two sisters throughout their lives.
Link Noble savage.
Later, Charlotte was ascribed this homesickness to the routine and discipline of the school, stating that she feared Emily would have died if she had not been allowed home.
Might want to specify which Halifax, my first thought was Halifax, Nova Scotia.
In 1842, Emily and Charlotte traveled to/attended? the Heger Pensionnat in Brussels, in the hope of perfecting their French and German before opening their own school.—Also, what is the Heger Pensionnat? Might want to explain briefly within the text, since there isn't a page for it.
She was not popular among the other students, and the children to whom she taught the piano remembered her with dislike.
...at first refused, but, according to Charlotte...
I can understand why the "Personality and character" section is where it is, since it's at just about the point where she would such personality and character she she had would have fully developed. That said, I think because it jumps throughout the chronology of her life so much, it might be better positioned after other biographical sections, possibly between "Death" and "Legacy" or after both.
The picture here might also benefit from an "|upright" parameter (ex. "[[Image:Emily Brontë cropped.jpg|thumb|upright|Portrait painted by [[Branwell Brontë]] in 1833; sources are in disagreement over whether this image is of Emily or Anne.<ref name="Portrait" />]]"). Right now it's a bit big.
Although she seemingly enjoyed cooking, John Sutherland mentions her 'obstinate fasting', and biographer Katherine Frank suggests that Emily may have suffered from anorexia.—See MOS:CQ. Also, citation needed.
Emily died a year after its publication, aged 30.—Probably not necessary, given the next section.
The plaque image in the "Death" section might also benefit from an "|upright" parameter.
By noon, Emily's condition had worsened. She could only whisper in gasps.
The "Legacy" section is a bit messy. Chronologically, it's all over the place, and per MOS:PARA, it's generally best to avoid one-sentence paragraphs. Looking at it, I think you could logically group the sentences here into two paragraphs: one for the 20th century and another for the 21st century.
Authors who have been inspired by Emily Brontë include: Sylvia Plath, Jacqueline Wilson, Joanne Harris, Margaret Atwood, Kate Mosse, Dorothy Koomson and Lucy Powrie.—Also might not hurt to explain her influence on at least a few of these authors.
In the 2022 film Emily, written and directed by Frances O'Connor, Emma Mackey plays Emily before the publication of Wuthering Heights. The film mixes known biographical details with imagined situations and relationships.—Citation needed.
Norwegian composer Ola Gjeilo set selected Emily Brontë poems to music with SATB chorus, string orchestra, and piano, a work commissioned and premiered by the San Francisco Choral Society in a series of concerts in Oakland and San Francisco.—Citation needed.
The "citations" in the "Works" section should probably have a "|ref=none" parameter, since they're not actually being cited, just listed.
Generally, for short citations, it's preferable to use the SFN (shortened footnote) template. For example, "Fraser, The Brontës, p. 16" might be better rendered as "{{sfn|Fraser|1988|p=16}}". See the template documentation for details.
Another quick note, per your last GA nom, it's generally best etiquette to respond to GA reviewers on the review page once you've made any requested changes. You don't need to do it for this, since this isn't a GA review, but just a heads up. In any case, hope this helps! Spookyaki (talk) 19:03, 9 June 2025 (UTC)

Thank you so much for this Spookyaki: it's very much appreciated.ArthurTheGardener (talk) 21:09, 9 June 2025 (UTC)
Instances of "Emily" after first mention should in most cases be replaced with "Brontë". Other Brontës should be referred to by given names. MOS:SURNAME. 2600:4040:3118:E800:8C1A:72C:5C55:80C1 (talk) 15:32, 30 July 2025 (UTC)
I agree that in most cases this makes sense: in the case of this article, however, mention of the other Brontës is so frequent that it seems clearer to specify 'Emily', although I would be interested in others' thoughts on this .ArthurTheGardener (talk) 07:11, 31 July 2025 (UTC)
You maybe kindly want to add in thw music section of the Emily Brontë page that there is a wonderful album with settings of Emily`s püoems by Swedish singer-songwriter Sofie Livebrant. The album is called "Weep the time away" , connected with a few singles with more Emily Bronte songs, especially the single: "The Star (Emily Brontë Poem no 18)" (Sofie Livebrant) The albunm is available on youtube or spotify etc  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2003:F9:BF04:53A5:418C:4A94:BCD8:96D6 (talk) 03:38, 3 August 2025 (UTC) 

Hi ArthurTheGardener, thanks for your work on this. It's nice to see work on prominent authors. I'm still reading through the article, but it's quite clear that the prose and organization are in good shape. The outcome will hinge on whether the sourcing issues flagged in the previous GA review have been handled. I see that a lot of revision was done after the last review, so I am hopeful. I will attempt to do a spot-check later, but I lack access to the print source. One minor note is that citation 1 isn't helpful: we shouldn't be using internal wikimedia links for sourcing. If the information comes from the source for the commons image, that source is what should be cited. Best, Vanamonde93 (talk) 17:45, 2 October 2025 (UTC)

Hi Vanamonde93; thank you for that: I'll check it out! ArthurTheGardener (talk) 08:50, 3 October 2025 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Emily Brontë/GA2. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: ArthurTheGardener (talk · contribs) 16:58, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
Reviewer: Tim riley (talk · contribs) 09:59, 31 October 2025 (UTC)


### Initial comments
A few comments on the prose. Most of them are merely suggestions, but the Manual of Style points should certainly be addressed, and I think you should check the point about "contagious" -v- "infectious" and correct if necessary.

General
Your fondness for the word "however" becomes repetitive, and more often than not the word adds nothing to the meaning and is mere verbiage. What does it usefully add to these?
However, Emily left after only a few months
However, her health suffered
However, the Jenkins family soon ceased to invite the sisters
However, Constantin Heger, who was in charge of the academy, thought highly of Emily
However, the sudden illness and death of their aunt, Elizabeth Branwell, forced the sisters' return
However, she remained in Haworth
It is a mere superstition that one should never begin a sentence with "However," but it should be done discriminatingly.
Manual of Style

The Manual of Style stipulates the use of "logical punctuation" – thus, e.g., in "like twins."[30] the full stop should follow the closing quotation marks.
The manual also specifies a space on either side of dots in ellipses: so that .e.g. "Emily...was so absorbed in herself" should be "Emily ... was so absorbed in herself"
We put a full stop at the end of a picture caption only if the caption is a full sentence and there shouldn't be one in "Cowan Bridge School, now known as The Brontë School."
Titles of cited works should be in title case, regardless of how the authors, publishers or catalaloguers treated them. (I think this a silly rule, but a rule it remains.)
Spaced en-dashes rather than hyphens should be used in, e.g. refs 6 and 96 and anywhere else.
Your citation style should be consistent: why
Barker, Juliet (1994). The Brontes. Weidenfeld & Nicolson. p. 245. ISBN 978-0297812906 and
Barker, Juliet (2010). The Brontes. Abacus. p. 252. ISBN 978-0748122189, but
Fraser, The Brontës, p. 16
Fraser, A Life of Anne Brontë, p. 39
Citation 82 is plainly insufficient.
In citation 109, title case,  not all-caps, please.
Individual points
"… their aunt, Elizabeth Branwell. Aside from brief intervals at school, she was mostly taught at home" – two points here, First, why the AmE "aside from" rather than the BrE "apart from"? Secondly, the last person named before "she was mostly taught" was Elizabeth Branwell, but the "she" is actually Emily.
"The Brontë family lived on Market Street, in Thornton" – another not very welcome Americanism. The traditional English version is "in So-and-So Street".
"unsanitary conditions" – the normal adjective is "insanitary" (and the only form known to the Chambers Dictionary, though "unsanitary" gets a passing mention in the OED)
"outbreaks of contagious disease such as typhoid and tuberculosis" – if I correctly understand it, neither typhoid nor tuberculosis is a contagious disease: they are infectious.
"When Emily was thirteen"… but … "the 17-hour workday" … "contributed 19 poems" – words or digits? There is no rule about this: some use words up to ten and digits from 11 onwards; others use words up to twenty; others (me included) use words up to a hundred, but whichever you prefer you should, I suggest, be consistent
"some friends of the family, the Jenkins, had promised" – the Jenkins family collectively are "the Jenkinses" – as in "keeping up with the Joneses".
"channeled" – this American variant of "chanelled" would be better in the normal English form.
"Aylott & Jones, based at 8, Paternoster Row" – do we need to know the firm's address?
"Following Charlotte's unsuccessful ….Wuthering Heights and Agnes Grey" – this sentence is nearly a hundred words long and could do with splitting in two.
"Contextualizes", "cauterized", "fictionalized" but "recognised" – I commend Sir Ernest Gowers's advice from Plain Words:  the British writer has the advantage over the American that we may, if we wish, use an s all the time, for that will never be wrong, whereas z sometimes will be.
"sources are in disagreement" – rather a long-winded way of saying "disagree"
"Biographer Claire Harman" … "biographer Katherine Frank" … "graphic novelist Isabel Greenberg" … "singer-songwriter Cliff Richard, "Norwegian composer Ola Gjeilo" – horribly clunky false titles: a definite article before each will remove the clunk.
"unsanitary conditions at home" – as above
Music section: I'm surprised to see the omission of the opera Wuthering Heights by the composer Bernard Herrmann (of Psycho fame). It was not staged in Herrmann's lifetime (on account of its excessive length) but he conducted a recording of it in 1966 with Morag Beaton as Cathy.
Something has gone awry with citation 98
I hope these suggestions are helpful. Over to you. – Tim riley talk 09:59, 31 October 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for these careful and detailed notes, Tim. I'll get onto this.ArthurTheGardener (talk) 08:40, 2 November 2025 (UTC)
Are we progressing? I don't want to fail the GAN but we need some evidence on this page that my concerns are being addressed. Tim riley talk 19:53, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
Hi Tim riley, I think I’ve addressed most of your points, barring a few reference formatting inconsistencies that I haven’t had the chance to address yet. However, I appreciate your time, and I’d be interested to know how far the article needs to reach GA status at this stage. ArthurTheGardener (talk) 22:30, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
I think you've done much of what was needed, to the extent that I feel confident in promoting the article to GA. It is plainly of high quality and has the potential to go to FAC, in my view.


### Overall summary
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality: 

B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists: 

Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources: 
Well referenced.
B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary: 
Well referenced.
C. No original research: 

Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects: 

B. Focused: 

Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias: 

Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc: 

Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales: 
Well illustrated.
B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions: 
Well illustrated.
Overall:
Pass or Fail: