# Talk:Maryland Route 331

This review is transcluded from Talk:Maryland Route 331/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Starting GA review. Jezhotwells (talk) 03:12, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
Quick fail criteria assessment

The article completely lacks reliable sources – see Wikipedia:Verifiability.

The topic is treated in an obviously non-neutral way – see Wikipedia:Neutral point of view.

There are cleanup banners that are obviously still valid, including cleanup, wikify, NPOV, unreferenced or large numbers of fact, clarifyme, or similar tags.

The article is or has been the subject of ongoing or recent, unresolved edit wars.

The article specifically concerns a rapidly unfolding current event with a definite endpoint.

No problems with quick fail criteria. Jezhotwells (talk) 19:33, 6 July 2009 (UTC)


### Checking against GA criteria
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): 
\i made some copy-edits to improve the grammar.
b (MoS): 

It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): 

b (citations to reliable sources): 

c (OR): 

It is broad in its scope.
a (major aspects): 

b (focused): 

It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars etc.: 

It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): 
tagged and licensed
b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 

Overall:
Pass/Fail: 
A good clean article. Congratulations. Jezhotwells (talk) 19:46, 6 July 2009 (UTC)