# Talk:French seaplane carrier Commandant Teste

Since I'm new to GAN I don't want to start a full GAN review just yet. However, a couple of comments about the intro - "she was only damaged by splinters" - what sort of splinters? Wooden splinters? Shell splinters? Also, why "only"? Wouldn't "slightly" be a more appropriate word in this context?

Yes, it would.
Additionally, she was scuttled in '42, but then "considered for conversion" after the war. How can a scuttled ship be considered for conversion? You might need to provide a little more detail there. Gatoclass (talk) 16:18, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

Hmmm, she was refloated after being scuttled.
Also, in the "service" section - I think you should mention the outbreak of WWII as not everybody may know or recall that the war began for France in September 1939. Also, "she was arrived at ... " Gatoclass (talk) 16:30, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

Good catch.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 17:40, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:French seaplane carrier Commandant Teste/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Wizardman Operation Big Bear 03:40, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
Sorry for the delay on the review. Overall the article is good. I found a few small issues, but I just went and fixed them myself. As a result, I am passing this article as a GA. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 03:40, 28 May 2010 (UTC)