# Talk:Lone Wolf v. Hitchcock

This review is transcluded from Talk:Lone Wolf v. Hitchcock/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Seabuckthorn (talk · contribs) 00:09, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
Nominator: GregJackP Boomer!
Hi! My review for this article will be here shortly.  --Seabuckthorn ♥ 00:09, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

1: Well-written

a. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors: 
b. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists: 

2: Verifiable with no original research

a. Has an appropriate reference section:  Yes
b. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:  excellent (Thorough check on Google.)

c. No original research:   Done

3: Broad in its coverage

4: Neutral

5: Stable: No edit wars, etc:  Yes
6: Images  Done (Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license) (PD)

As per the above checklist, there are no issues with the article and it’s a GA. The prose quality in particular has been fantastic in all your articles. I’m inspired a lot by your conscientiousness. Thanks, GregJackP, very much for your diligence in writing such great articles. 
Promoting the article to GA status.  --Seabuckthorn ♥ 22:23, 27 February 2014 (UTC)