# Talk:French ironclad Magenta (1890)

This review is transcluded from Talk:French ironclad Magenta (1890)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Hog Farm (talk · contribs) 16:08, 30 March 2020 (UTC)


### Criteria
1. Prose  Pass
2. Verifiability  Pass
3. Depth of Coverage  Pass
4. Neutral  Pass
5. Stable  Pass
6. Illustrations  Likely
7. Miscellaneous  Pass


### Comments
1. 

"They introduced the lozenge arrangement for their main battery" - Since this is talking about the class overall, I think it should be singular.
Changed "They" to "The ships"
Infobox gives two compound steam engines, text gives four.  Which is correct?
Fixed
Maybe consider rephrasing "the French began rebuilding" as "The French navy began rebuilding"
Done
Infobox gives fate as scrapped, prose gives fate as "unknown".
Fixed
2.

Namesake needs a citation
Removed, as I don't have a citation
Deck armor needs a citation
Added a line to the design section
3. 
4.
5.
6.

Is the PD-US tag on file:Marceua line drawing.png appropriate since the book it's from appears to have been published in the UK not the US?  I'm not an expert at file tagging.
It should have been {{PD-US-1923-abroad}}
7.

Any idea why sources are so conflicting on the armament?  If so, it might be worth mentioning as a note.

Placing on hold, just a few issues - a couple prose issues, two inconsistencies, and a couple citations needed. Hog Farm (talk) 02:30, 1 April 2020 (UTC)

Thanks Hog Farm. Parsecboy (talk) 20:21, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
Passing Hog Farm (talk) 20:59, 2 April 2020 (UTC)