# Talk:Karađorđeva šnicla

After randomly stumbling upon this, I had to fix a case of improper citing of sources in [1], and I noticed it had just recently passed GA review. @Rollinginhisgrave can we please do another round of checking of these Serbian sources and their citations for any similar bits of original research? --Joy (talk) 21:05, 20 September 2024 (UTC)

Rollinginhisgrave can double-check again, but I doubt that there's any OR left. That seems to have only slipped under my radar while translating. Vacant0 (talk • contribs) 21:08, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
Hi Joy, I'm pretty satisfied this isn't a systematic issue based off my source review. Thanks for catching this instance. Rollinginhisgrave (talk) 00:54, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
It seems to be generally hard to get good sources on this topic because it's in such a casual field of endeavor. Even the way it is now is shoddy by WP:RS standards - we're carrying a single-sentence claim of one guy talking to the press and providing a tourist board general promotional website for counterbalance. Similarly, I noticed that [2] starts with 'One Reddit user posted a picture...' and overall it's half a dozen paragraphs of largely quoting a smattering of unreliable sources. We should strive for a higher standard, maybe focus more on published cookbook material or history books rather than whatever was in the news. --Joy (talk) 06:52, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
Thanks Joy for these notes. The article citing to Reddit needs to go. Would you recommend the wholesale removal of the material cited to shoddy sources? Writing articles in food, there is a struggle with really bad sourcing available. Looking back at my review, I had concerns with citing the "A Kurir recipe" section, given A) it's a tabloid, and B) it's likely undue, as there are plenty of recipes online and in newspapers that will have variations, but it's not worth mentioning as a variation. I should have made a note of this and it should be removed. Rollinginhisgrave (talk) 05:34, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
I suppose the big problem is finding replacement sources. We can probably temper our reliance on less-than-great sources with more careful phrasing, to avoid making strong statements if we don't have a proper source. --Joy (talk) 09:11, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
Excellent work Vacant0. Thx. for the review, Rollinginhisgrave. — Sadko (words are wind) 21:15, 22 September 2024 (UTC)