# Talk:George E. Crothers

This review is transcluded from Talk:George E. Crothers/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Tomcat7 (talk · contribs) 17:18, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose):  b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): 

It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 

It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 

It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 

It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 

Overall:
Pass/Fail: 

Ref 20 is dead.--Tomcat (7) 17:23, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
I've replaced the above dead link with two new sources (currently footnotes #20 and #21).  Do you see anything else that needs fixing?  — Richwales (no relation to Jimbo) 18:17, 17 January 2013 (UTC)