# Talk:Don Gault

Typo?
--A bit iffy (talk) 15:44, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Don Gault/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Seabuckthorn (talk · contribs) 03:24, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
Nominator: Wizardman
Hi! My review for this article will be here shortly.  --Seabuckthorn ♥ 03:24, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
1: Well-written

a. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors: 
b. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists: 

2: Verifiable with no original research

a. Has an appropriate reference section:  Yes
b. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:  excellent (Thorough check on Google. Cross-checked with the other FAs)

c. No original research:   Done

3: Broad in its coverage

4: Neutral

5: Stable: No edit wars, etc:  Yes
6: Images (None)

I'm glad to see your work here. I do have some insights based on the above checklist that I think will improve the article: 

I think the layout needs to be fixed.
Besides that, I think the article looks excellent. All the best,  --Seabuckthorn ♥ 12:01, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

Do you have a suggestion where to put the personal life info? I hate having that section in articles myself so I'm entirely fine getting rid of it, I've just tried and failed in making it work inside the article without it seeming jarring (I was also hoping to find later info on him so I could just use it as a post-career section, but no luck there). Wizardman 14:25, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
I guess it will go better if you remove it.  I'm usually reluctant when it comes to deleting any relevant content. But it's a BLP and his wife is not notable. Also, we are discouraged to include personal info in a BLP in order to ensure privacy. So I'd not prefer devoting a Heading 2 to personal life with a very short paragraph because it will stand out in the article, but if you find later info on him, please feel free to restore the content. That's the best advice I can give.  But really, I'm willing to rely on your experience as a reviewer.  --Seabuckthorn ♥ 16:02, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
Fair enough, especially since there's nothing more recent on marriage or children, at best the source used is archaic. Removed that and merged the other note into his career. Wizardman 17:18, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
Thanks  --Seabuckthorn ♥ 20:13, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
Promoting the article to GA status.  --Seabuckthorn ♥ 20:13, 8 February 2014 (UTC)