# Talk:Hurricane Carol (1953)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Hurricane Carol (1953)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Cyclonebiskit (talk) 21:44, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
Excellent article hink, it's a great read. There is one little thing with the met history (always something, right?); what was steering the storm? Obviously the track would show a really strong ridge of high pressure being the dominant factor but is there any mention of it in an article? Other than that everything is all good. I'll pass the article once you get back to me on that tidbit. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 21:44, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

I have no idea, to be honest. I double-checked all of the sources I had (or in the newspapers), and I couldn't find out why. Back then, they didn't have as thorough meteorological stats as we have now. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk)  23:02, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
I guess that can't be helped. Well, I'm going to pass it, nice job. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 23:06, 8 February 2011 (UTC)