# Talk:Leak 04-13 (Bait Ones)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Leak 04-13 (Bait Ones)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: Joeyquism (talk · contribs) 01:32, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: Heartfox (talk · contribs) 07:01, 11 July 2024 (UTC)

"as "a catastrophe" → quotes in lead require inline citation per WP:LEADCITE
Reworded, as I don't enjoy having to include citations in the lead.
"was almost immediately felt" → informal
Rephrased to "'BTSTU' also had an impact on contemporary pop music" - if a different phrasing is better here let me know
"noted", "however" → WP:WTW
Removed "noted", though I'm not sure of which "however" you're referring to here
"Some publications refrained from reviewing the 2013 bootleg" , " but critics who did choose to make note of it offered mostly positive opinions" → only one publication is cited to support each of these statements, but they are written as plural?
You're right. I've removed this sentence altogether.
many of the genres stated in infobox are not supported in body
Changed to just pop, R&B and electronic
Stephen ref missing magazine name
Fixed.
Can you get a timestamp for the Masa interview?
Unfortunately, I think the only audible proof that this quote is even legitimate comes from this clip on Soundcloud. I couldn't find any archives of Zane Lowe's interviews anywhere.
Not sure where DeVille supports that the album was released by XL
Added the Pitchfork review to supplement this.
Heartfox (talk) 07:01, 11 July 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for the review, Heartfox! This is one of the earlier works that I've done, and I'm realizing that it's in a bit of a shoddier state than I'd hoped. Looking forward to your further comments. joeyquism (talk) 13:28, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
Hi Heartfox, is there more to come on this? joeyquism (talk) 16:32, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
How do the genres in the infobox meet WP:EXPLICITGENRE? Heartfox (talk) 00:22, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
Pitchfork labels the album as pop and R&B in their review of the album here. I've since removed the electronic label as there aren't any direct mentions of an electronic label that I can find. I apologize for these errors. joeyquism (talk) 07:26, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
@Joeyquism: Thanks, passed. If you are able to leave comments at my current FAC that would be great! Best, Heartfox (talk) 19:56, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for the review, Heartfox. I very much appreciate your consideration, but unfortunately I cannot promise a review at this time as I am planning to take an extended wikibreak after completing my own FAC and have tried to cut back on my contributions in the meantime. While I may eventually have the opportunity to review your nomination, I cannot make any guarantees at this moment. I hope you understand, and I wish you the best with your nomination. joeyquism (talk) 21:08, 21 July 2024 (UTC)