# Talk:HMS Myngs (1914)

This review is transcluded from Talk:HMS Myngs (1914)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Zawed (talk · contribs) 05:08, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
I will take this one, comments to follow in due course. Zawed (talk) 05:08, 29 January 2023 (UTC)

Thank you, Zawed. I look forward to your comments. simongraham (talk) 12:53, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Lead

The M class were an improvement on the preceding L class...: suggest either "The M class ships were an improvement on those of the preceding L class..."
Added.
Should the hyphen be present on all instances of "M class" & "L class"?
I have tried to follow Template:Sclass in using the hyphen for the adjectival form and without for the noun.
Design and development

...the greater performance was appreciated...: suggest, for greater specificity, "the greater performance of the M-class was appreciated".
Changed.
a length of 265 ft (80.8 m) : the conversion in "m" doesn't match what is in the infobox
Fixed the infobox so it is consistent.
Referring to speed, those in the infobox go to the first decimal point.
Similarly fixed.
Mystic had a main armament ...: Mystic?
Oops. I updated the sentence from the GA review of the other destroyer but forgot to change the name. Fixed.
Construction and career

By the following month, the routine developed...: suggest "a routine"
Changed.
...unsuccessful search for the German minelaying...: suggest "a German"
Changed.
Other stuff

Sources look reliable, no spotchecks done as nominator has excellent history
Monograph 33 is listed as a source but doesn't seem to be cited
Good spot. I have added the relevant sentence.
No dupe links
Image tags OK.
Looks in fine shape, only minor issues found. Cheers, Zawed (talk) 08:08, 11 February 2023 (UTC)

@Zawed: Thank you for another very helpful review. I believe I have made all the changes. Please tell me if there is anything else. simongraham (talk) 13:42, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Your changes look fine, so am passing as GA now as I believe the article meets the necessary criteria. Cheers, Zawed (talk) 01:59, 12 February 2023 (UTC)