# Talk:Cup of China

This review is transcluded from Talk:Cup of China/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.


##### Summary
The article is  accurate and verifiable via the citations provided with no copy vio. issues. It passes GA criteria as follows in the section below.


#### 1. Well written
The article is well written and engaging, even to someone not an expert in the field, such as this reviewer. As well, it follows house style guidelines.


##### 2. Accuracy and verifiability
The article stands up as accurate and verifiable without external research.  Citation 1 refers to a book that is not online, however I have confirmed that it exists and refers directly to this subject.  
Citations 2 through 40 are hyperlinked and verified.   Citations 14 through 40 are skating scores; some are archived, but they do load and point directly to tables of source data.  So these are all spot on.  
A very minor suggestion is that in some cases, the link to the original article should be removed if it is no longer active, leaving only the active hyperlink to the archived data.  Hope that makes sense.  This is not a pre-qualification however. 


##### 3.  Broad in coverage
The article covers the background and history of the event and interesting contextual details, readily qualifying as broad in coverage.


#### Neutral
4.  The article is a good example of NPOV, free from editorializing.  It gives adequate scope and due weight to all aspects of the material.


##### Stable
5. The article is stable..


##### Images
4. Makes goood use of pictorial content and results tables.


##### Summary
This is an attractively presented page, well thought out and written. I personally enjoyed the experience as a reviewer and have no hesitation in recommending this as a Good Article. Thank you. Astral highway (talk) 17:40, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
I was asked to confirm that I've checked the citations, which I have now updated in the review, along with a more systematic display of the six GA criteria reviewed. Astral highway (talk) 16:53, 25 October 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for the experience of reviewing your article for GA status. I enjoyed it very much and applaud you for its structure and for the clarity of the writing. I made some really tiny edits, which you can review in the history. 
Best wishes, Astral highway (talk) Astral highway (talk) 17:45, 23 October 2025 (UTC)