# Talk:Go to the Future

Please add some text indicating why this album meets one or more of the following notability requirements:

Wikipedia:Notability - general notability guideline
Wikipedia:Notability (music) - notability guideline for bands, musicians, albums, and songs
A quote from the music notability guideline:

Important note: Failing to satisfy the notability guidelines is not a criterion for speedy deletion. However, an article on an artist or band that does not indicate that the subject of the article is important or significant can be speedily deleted under criterion A7. A mere claim of significance, even if contested, may avoid speedy deletion under A7, requiring a full proposed deletion or Article for Deletion process to determine if the article should be included in Wikipedia.
davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 22:42, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

Band albums available on amazon.com [1], band profile on allmusic.com [2]. --Ilion2 (talk) 09:51, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
The notability requirements for Wikipedia are higher than this.  See Wikipedia:Notability (music). Please improve the article so it is clear that the notability requirements are met, then remove the notability tag I added. If the article is not improved, it will probably wind up at WP:Articles for deletion and it will probably wind up deleted.  davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 15:31, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Notability_(music)#Albums.2C_singles_and_songs : "In general, if the musician or ensemble that recorded an album is considered notable, then officially released albums may have sufficient notability to have individual articles on Wikipedia." That should be enough. The tag was added by User:24.6.151.226. --Ilion2 (talk) 17:50, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
The music group that released this album's notability is in question.  Please either beef up Sakanaction so it's notability is no longer in question or add sufficient claims of notability to this article so it can stand alone if Sakanaction is deleted.  davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 18:04, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Go to the Future/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: The Rambling Man (talk · contribs) 07:02, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
The Rambling Man this review is pending from a long time. Are you going to do it? —Indian:BIO [ ChitChat ] 06:29, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
Comments

Any reason for the two specific citations in the lead?  Ordinarily the facts in the lead should be expanded upon in the main body and that's where they can be cited.
Typically with an album or single article I've always put a source after the lead sentence, but I suppose I don't really need to! Done.
"made up of " -> "comprising"
Fixed.
You link techno in the infobox but not in the prose.
Fixed.
"Kusakari was originally in" no need to so quickly repeat her surname.
Replaced with 'she'.
"and "Shiranami Top Water" managed to chart " just "and "Shiranami Top Water" charted " would be tighter.
Done.
Sapporo is linked in the image caption in the section after which it is first mentioned.
Removed, but I thought that image captions generally linked to the subjects they depict as they're not a part of the continuous text flow.
"sound the core of Sakanaction's sound" bit repetitive.
Fixed.
" song "Mikazuki Sunset".[22] "Mikazuki Sunset" was" again, repetitive prose.
Fixed.
"album then" when is "then"?  At the moment of the lossless release, shortly afterwards, something else?
Clarified.
" managed to reach number" again, just tighter to say "reached number".
Fixed.
Track lengths don't add up to length.  I guess there's filler gaps?
Strange! It's the time listed in the Tower source which is generally based on what the record company says, but the iTunes times add up differently.
Sortable charts table is (a) pointless and (b) doesn't work properly as it moves the second heading!
Fixed.
I'm loathe to see empty cells in tables, so if information is not available, use N/A or {{N/A}} perhaps.
Done, though I don't think I've ever seen an n/a cell in a release history box before.
I'll place on hold, apologies for the delay in the review.  The Rambling Man (talk) 15:33, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

How's the article now? --Prosperosity (talk) 04:18, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
Yes, improved and easily meets the GA criteria, so I'll pass.  Good work.  The Rambling Man (talk) 09:53, 31 August 2015 (UTC)