# Talk:Hollywood A.D.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Hollywood A.D./GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Glimmer721 (talk · contribs) 16:28, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
Will review soon. Glimmer721 talk 16:28, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
Comments:

"...the attempted murder of a Cardinal O'Fallon at his church". It should be either "the Cardinal O'Fallon" or "a Cardinal". Also, clarify whose church it is--Skinner's or Federman's?
Charles Burks points to List of minor The X-Files characters, but there isn't a section for him there.
"Mulder visits Cardinal O'Fallon, who admits..." Wait. I thought Cardinal O'Fallon was murdered?
"...the man comes back to life on the operating table, but when Scully looks down he is back on the operating table." This could be made clearer; maybe just say that Scully did not notice he came back to life.
"...hinting at the continued romantic relationship between Mulder and Scully that has been hinted at in the last few episodes." Change one of the hints.
Give Spotniz's title (executive producer, etc.)
"a smart, intelligent, quirky, and intelligent idea" I know this is a direct quote, but you may want to edit it to avoid repition that doesn't add anything. Maybe "a smart, intelligent, quirky...idea".
"Assistant director Barry K. Thomas was cast as Sugar Bear" The character of Sugar Bear isn't mentioned in the plot, so who is he?
"Several of the family members and friends cast by Duchovny able to apply for their Screen Actor's Guild card as well as apply for a health insurance plan". Missing a word here...is it supposed to be "were able"?
"nudge-nudge, wink-wink writing-directin" Is that supposed to be "directing"?
Looks good other than those small things. I made a few small fixes as well. Thanks for reviewing my articles, by the way! Glimmer721 talk 20:01, 8 April 2012 (UTC)

OK, I believe I've addressed all the issues. The only one I didn't change was the second issues about O'Fallon. He wasn't murdered, but an attempt on his life was made, unsuccessfully.--Gen. Quon (talk) 23:02, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
Sorry, did I miss the "attempted"? My bad. Passing... Glimmer721 talk 23:59, 8 April 2012 (UTC)

I just noticed that someone disagrees with me. On the Internet! I know, how unlikely is that?
"Self-reflexive" is an inherently redundant term. There is no concept that would be "reflexive", but refer to someone else exclusively. (Please don't confuse this with optics. Thanks.)
Now I'm aware that the term is used in its article, I just figure that it should be avoided, given the better alternative "self-referential".
As to the direct quote: From where? Why do we need something to quote from in the first place? Do we have to pick a quote that uses the term wrong?-217.248.3.146 (talk) 07:09, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Hollywood A.D.. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.the11thhour.com/archives/052000/tvreviews/xf_hollywoodad.html
Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.space.com/sciencefiction/tv/xfiles_719_000501.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 18:11, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Hollywood A.D.. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140321062738/http://www.canada.com/montrealgazette/story.html?id=ab9b65d4-0347-48c9-a2fa-46c444fda92c to http://www.canada.com/montrealgazette/story.html?id=ab9b65d4-0347-48c9-a2fa-46c444fda92c
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:14, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Hollywood A.D.. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://archive.is/20120913160705/http://www.televisionwithoutpity.com/show/the-xfiles/hollywood-ad.php?page=13 to http://www.televisionwithoutpity.com/show/the-xfiles/hollywood-ad.php?page=13
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:50, 5 November 2017 (UTC)