# Talk:Marge Frantz

This review is transcluded from Talk:Marge Frantz/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Eddie891 (talk · contribs) 22:39, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
Can attend to shortly. Eddie891  Talk Work  22:39, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for picking this one up Eddie891 Please ping me when you are ready for me to review the comments, as I am hip deep in women's nationality. SusunW (talk) 22:51, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
"and began work at the Board of Economic Warfare" Might benefit from a brief explanation of context
 Done SusunW (talk) 17:54, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
University of California, Berkeley is linked on its second mention in the body, but not the first
 Done SusunW (talk) 17:54, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
"She completed her bachelor's degree with distinction" I'm unfamiliar with what "with distinction" means -- is it a formal recognition?
Yes, it means she had a high grade point average. According to UC Berkeley's website, it says it is roughly equivalent to cum laude, so I added a link. If that suffices,  Done. SusunW (talk) 17:54, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
Is it "UC, Santa Cruz" or "UC Santa Cruz"?
Typically if it is the University of California, X there is a comma, but UC X if you are abbreviating. I fixed the one instance with a comma.  Done SusunW (talk) 17:54, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
So whatever happened to her husband?
(He died ;)? Sorry, I couldn't help myself.) It doesn't appear that they ever divorced, both obits call them spouse's but acknowledge the later partner. SusunW (talk) 17:54, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
Is it "Scharr" or "Schaar"?
Two "a"s. Fixed it throughout.  Done SusunW (talk) 17:54, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
Some more to come, will ping when done Eddie891  Talk Work  14:39, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Sources all reliable, nothing really to add-- Really nice work, just some very minor things. Answering my own question about what happened to her husband, I see now "Frantz's husband began a partnership in Palo Alto with Miriam Patchen". Could you maybe clarify this is a romantic partnership (if it is), not work partnership (as I thought initially). Really nicely done. Eddie891  Talk Work  01:11, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
I changed it to read romantic partners in one place and relationship in another. Thank you so much for the review Eddie891. Always a joy to work with you. Let me know if there are any other outstanding issues. SusunW (talk) 17:54, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
This is clearly at the GA status, nothing further to add. Well done as always. Eddie891  Talk Work  01:55, 12 March 2021 (UTC)