# Talk:Nepal house martin

Article (edit | visual edit | history) ·  Article talk (edit | history) ·  Watch

GA review (see here for criteria)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose):  b (MoS): 
Very well written!
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 
Very well sourced, one of the better GA's I've read in a while.
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 
I learned a bit about this species I had never heard of before today, all bases are covered!
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 

It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 
Although I'm not a big "image guy", if you want to move this up to FAC, you might want to consider a picture of the nest in that section, a minor point, but it could help the article, the ones on Commons didn't appear High-res enough to use as a thumbnail, so I didn't add one.
Overall: Good job!  I enjoyed doing this one!
Pass/Fail: 

Reviewer: Mike - Μολὼν λαβέ 00:59, 16 December 2009 (UTC)