# Talk:Buah Rindu

This review is transcluded from Talk:Buah Rindu/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Tim riley (talk · contribs) 11:16, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
Starting first read-through. More soonest. – Tim riley (talk) 11:16, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

Before formally assessing this article against the GA criteria, may I offer a few gratuitous points on the prose? They are just my personal thoughts, and don't affect the question of GA status (which I shall definitely be awarding, I may say).

Lead
"whilst" – I never know what this quaint word has to offer that "while" hasn't, apart from two unnecessary letters. There's another "whilst" later, too.
Done both. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:08, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
"highly fixed traditional" – I think "highly fixed" needs a hyphen. And also at its occurrence in the "Style" section.
I believe that MOS:HYPHEN suggests no hyphen (adverb, not adjective). — Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:08, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
Second para – two "highly"s in close proximity.
Removed one. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:08, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
Style
"in the center" – up to this point I thought we were using UK English ("coloured", "favourites") but now US English – or other variant – pops up.
Apologies. Now fixed. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:08, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
That's my lot. If you care to ponder and bat the ball back to me I'll do the GA formalities. – Tim riley (talk) 12:02, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the review! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:09, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

Good grief! I've hardly had time to catch my breath. All's now done, and here's the paperwork:
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality: 
B. MoS compliance: 
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources: 
B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary: 
C. No original research: 
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects: 
B. Focused: 
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias: 
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc: 
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales: 
B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions: 
Overall:
Pass or Fail: 
Bravo! – Tim riley (talk) 12:16, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

Thank you! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:49, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
Good grief indeed! Thanks both!♦ Dr. Blofeld 14:23, 10 November 2013 (UTC)