# Talk:Lynch Fragments

This review is transcluded from Talk:Lynch Fragments/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: 19h00s (talk · contribs) 16:21, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
Reviewer: WriterArtistDC (talk · contribs) 14:51, 21 August 2025 (UTC)

This should be quick, since the heavy lifting was done in the January peer review. I will likely only do a spot check of sources. WriterArtistDC (talk) 15:00, 21 August 2025 (UTC)
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, spelling, and grammar):  b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): 

It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.
a (reference section):  b (inline citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):  d (copyvio and plagiarism): 

It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 

It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 

It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate. (I recognize the difficulty of finding images of contemporary works of art.)
a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 

Overall:
Pass/Fail: