# Talk:Letting Go (Body of Proof)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Letting Go (Body of Proof)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Gen. Quon (talk · contribs) 16:20, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

Intro: "who seem to be hiding" -> "both of whom seem to be hiding"  Done
Intro: You don't need to link United States, per Overlink  Done - one links to Television in the United States, one just links to the country.
Intro: Maybe organize the last paragraph a bit better so that the Nielsen ratings and the sentence about the lower ratings are next to each other. Not a biggie. Not done - Would have to change all BOP articles to fit this, and in a previous review, I got told "Critics, then ratings".
Plot: Why is there a reference for the first sentence? I'd just put all of them at the end of the entire section  Done
Plot: "Brian is repeating this with Nina" Maybe something like "Brian has started to abuse Nina, however." just to make it clearer  Done
Plot: You don't need to cite the episode with the episode. It's assumed that, since this is a page on the episode, the episode will automatically be used as a reference  Not done - In all BOP articles, just a back up on DYK reviews and FAC reviews.
Production: "best known for directing" -> "best known for directing episodes of"  Done
Production: Just a personal preference, but I think 'season 1' looks better as either "season one" or "the first season". Same with 'season 2' -  Not done In all BOP articles, and page name.
Reception: "Among viewers between ages 18 and 49, it received a 2.0 rating/9 share; a share represents the percentage of households using a television at the time the program is airing." -> "Among viewers between ages 18 and 49, it received a 2.0 rating/9 share. This means that it was seen by 2 percent of all 18- to 49-year-olds, and 9 percent of all 18- to 49-year-olds watching television at the time of the broadcast."  Done
Reception: Why does a statement from Christine Orlando of TV Fanatic end in a question mark?  Done
Reception: "She praised the interaction between the Megan" Kill 'the'  Done
Reception: "She finished, ""Letting Go" definitely" -> "She finished, "'Letting Go' definitely" (single quotes)  Done
References: add writer and director for Ref 2 and 6 -  Not done - Ref 2 is the article now - in the infobox, ref 6 is linked to the article. No need.
References: Use consistent dating methods (either Day Month, Year; Month Day, Year; etc)  Done
Otherwise, a good article. On hold for seven days.--Gen. Quon (Talk)  22:21, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review, very thorough! :) — M.Mario (T/C)  13:42, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) No, American should still be unlinked as per WP:OVERLINK guidelines. Even if its to Television in the United States. TBrandley 16:00, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
One is linked to "America and one is linked to Television in the United States. WP:OVERLINK does not work, if there are same words, linked to seperate articles. — M.Mario (T/C)  16:04, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
The link to America should be unlinked because per WP:OVERLINK you should Avoid linking the names of major geographic features and locations, languages, religions, and common professions.; this includes countries. Also, television in the US should be because it is a common term, and it does not enhance the reader's comprehensiveness. WP:OVERLINK does not just refer to the repeated linking of terms, but also the linking of general terms. TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 16:30, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
In the review by TBrandley here, it says "Link American to Television in the United States", so is this wrong? — M.Mario (T/C)  16:34, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
TBrandley continues to learn, and was probably not aware of the overlinking when doing that review. TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 16:36, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
No, I was not blaming him, but just wanted justification. — M.Mario (T/C)  16:45, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
That's fine. At that time, I thought United States is overlink, and TV in US wasn't. TV in US is a common term. TBrandley 16:56, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
This all looks good now. I will pass it. Congrats!--Gen. Quon (Talk)  02:34, 4 August 2012 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Letting Go (Body of Proof). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110613004337/http://abc.go.com/shows/body-of-proof/episode-detail/letting-go/743353 to http://abc.go.com/shows/body-of-proof/episode-detail/letting-go/743353
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:49, 18 June 2017 (UTC)