# Talk:Dawn of Mana

This article is in serious need of updating.  The game's already been out in Japan since December 21st.
I'd add to it if I had the game.--Claude 07:06, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
I have the game but I don't write very well. If someone wants to help me I'll be glad to fill out as much as possible. I don't have a wiki account so I'll use my e-mail to ID my posts.- Mikari@gmail.com
EU release date
Is this game ever coming out in europe? And if so, when ? :( Captain duck 13:57, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

The plot summary seems about right so I've removed the {{plot}} tag. --Tony Sidaway 21:16, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

King Stroud (Dark Lord) was a prince in the first game. Even then, he and other Mavoles (devils/demons) were seeking to return to Mavolia.
Lord Granz, who was considered a "good" character, remarked that "humans and Mavoles could be friends". In fact, Granz married Medusa, who was a Mavole. Also, in first game, a Dracula-styled boss was asked by Lord Granz to "protect those women". Heroine of the first game was the final candidate for the Bride. The Heroine's version of the game plot reveals that Stroud mistakenly believes that Mana clan betrayed Medusa and other Mavoles.
Overall, Mavoles are not necessarily evil - but are considered evil by most people.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.34.22.41 (talk) 22:47, 25 May 2011 (UTC) 

Your point? Larrythefunkyferret (talk) 04:48, 26 May 2011 (UTC)

Point of that big chunk of text was that info on Stroud seeking to return to Mavolia should be put to general Mana series article rather than to Dawn of Mana game.

It seems important to this article as well, as it explains Stroud's motive for his actions. Feel free to put it in the series article, though, if you think it will help. Larrythefunkyferret (talk) 02:48, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Dawn of Mana/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: ProtoDrake (talk · contribs) 20:49, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

I'll get back with comments and such in a day or two. If three days pass and I haven't done anything, please drop a reminder. --ProtoDrake (talk) 20:49, 5 June 2015 (UTC)


#### Review
@PresN: Having looked through the article, checked links and such, I can't see anything outstanding that stops me from giving this article an instant Pass. Did not expect it, and was a very refreshing change. --ProtoDrake (talk) 09:52, 7 June 2015 (UTC)