# Talk:Greek battleship Lemnos

Does it make sense to have two separate articles about the same ship? john k (talk) 20:58, 20 October 2011 (UTC)

I believe this states something about how if a ship had notable service in both navies, two articles is suggested. Buggie111 (talk) 23:13, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
It says two articles may be appropriate.  I would suggest that two articles, in general, is not terribly appropriate, but it's true that that solves some naming issues. john k (talk) 01:16, 21 October 2011 (UTC)

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Greek battleship Lemnos/CommentsTalk:Greek battleship Lemnos/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
Last edited at 12:31, 1 March 2012 (UTC).
Substituted at 16:42, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

I feel that
Kilkis and Lemnos sunk after German air attack, 1941.
should be
Lemnos (foreground) and Kilkis (background) sunk after German air attack, 1941
My conclusion rests on the photo of the Kilkis under air attack in her article and on a famous aerial photo of the Kilkis already sunk in my books. pietro151.29.200.96 (talk) 12:34, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

By the way
Close-range defense against torpedo boats was protected by a ... ptotected should be ensured 
At the outbreak of World War I in at the end of the month, ... in should not appear  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.29.200.96 (talk) 12:45, 28 June 2017 (UTC)