# Talk:Manila Hotel

Does anyone know of any free images that could be used in the article, or have any that could be licensed for use? I'd really appreciate it, as I think images would spruce up this article a ton. Please leave a note here or on my talk page. Thanks! GlassCobra (talk • contribs) 23:55, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

The article is very well written and sourced. I have no issues with most of the prose. The history section is quite interesting. The 'features' section does look a little too much like a hotel advertisement or brochure, and could be improved to be a bit more encyclopedic. Although it does seem reasonably well-sourced, with information from the NYT article and other sources, in addition to the hotel website, so that's a plus. Reference 15 doesn't follow the guidelines of WP:RS, as it goes to a blog posts (blogs are generally considered unacceptable as reliable sources, since there is no editorial control -- any idiot can write and publish a "blog").
The main issue is with the 'no free image' placeholder for the top of the infobox needs to be removed prior to GA status. Acceptable solutions would be **ideally** to find a suitable GFDL image of the hotel for the infobox. If this is not possible presently, then remove the 'no free image' placeholder and go with the infobox with no image. It would also be good to have some images of the interior in other sections of the article as well, but I could promote this to GA without them.
Cheers! Dr. Cash 18:06, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

Done. Alientraveller 18:25, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
Although the image does look like it came from a minor hurricane or storm, it is freely licensed, so is acceptable at the minimum level for GA status. I still wouldn't stop trying to acquire a better image, and images of the interior for some of the subsequent sections couldn't hurt, either. An image of the MacArthur Suite would be great! Cheers! Dr. Cash 20:15, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
One issue here (and with similar articles that touch upon Manila in 1945) is the use of the word "bombed". Manila was not bombed during the war too any great degree, the Manila Hotel included. It was burned and shelled and otherwise ravaged, but not bombed.--172.190.235.114 (talk) 05:53, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
From an architectural point of view, an image of the hotel's earlier pre-1970's appearance would be very useful to the article. Its current appearance looks ugly and unremarkable! Sionk (talk) 17:48, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Manila Hotel. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

Attempted to fix sourcing for http://bartssubic.com/barts/MacArthur.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 14:30, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Manila Hotel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/385515.stm
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131004215143/http://www.manila-hotel.com.ph/rooms/type/47 to http://www.manila-hotel.com.ph/rooms/type/47
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:44, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

001-manilahotel.jpg
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 07:24, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

The Manila Hotel, Manila, 2015 by Rommel Bundalian.jpg
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 05:38, 14 August 2022 (UTC)