# Talk:Fritz the Cat

An anonymous IP added the "Fictional Jews" category to the article. I believe that, as the character is meant to be derivative of its creator, R. Crumb, who is a gentile, that the character is not Jewish, although if citations can be provided proving that the character is supposed to be Jewish, I can add it back. (Sugar Bear 06:21, 16 November 2006 (UTC))

Maybe the name Fritz sounds somewhat Yiddish, although it's probably rather German. 惑乱 分からん 18:19, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Fritz the Cat/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
I shall be reviewing this page against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status. Jezhotwells (talk) 19:01, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
Quick fail criteria assessment

The article completely lacks reliable sources – see Wikipedia:Verifiability.

The topic is treated in an obviously non-neutral way – see Wikipedia:Neutral point of view.

There are cleanup banners that are obviously still valid, including cleanup, wikify, NPOV, unreferenced or large numbers of fact, clarifyme, or similar tags.

The article is or has been the subject of ongoing or recent, unresolved edit wars.

The article specifically concerns a rapidly unfolding current event with a definite endpoint.

No obvious problems found when checking against the quick fail criteria, moving on the substantive review. Jezhotwells (talk) 19:07, 20 July 2009 (UTC)


### Checking against GA criteria
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): 
Well written. Jezhotwells (talk) 19:14, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
b (MoS): 
Conforms with MoS sufficiently. I de-wikilinked Robin Hood as this goes to the folk hero, which doesn't seem right.  If I got this wrong, please re-link. Jezhotwells (talk) 19:38, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): 
All on-line references are live. References that I have been able to check are OK. Assume GF for the print sources. Jezhotwells (talk) 19:33, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
b (citations to reliable sources): 
I don't think we can categorize ref #9 [1]. It looks like a variety of wiki. On further investigation it appears that Markstein is an authority on comics and graphic novels, so OK for the statement it supports. Jezhotwells (talk) 19:33, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
c (OR): 
No evidence of OR. Jezhotwells (talk) 19:33, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
It is broad in its scope.
a (major aspects): 

b (focused): 

It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars etc.: 

It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): 

b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 

Overall:
Pass/Fail: 
OK, I believe this meets the Good Article criteria so, I am passing it to GA status. Congratulations.

Fritz the Cat is not for kids, neither is Comedy Central or [adult swim], but shouldn't Fritz the Cat be made as a Comedy Central original animated TV show? If Fritz the Cat was a TV show, it would be rated TV-MA-L-S-V, meaning, super seriously not for kids. Fritz the Cat is not a kids' cartoon, neither is South Park or Aqua Teen Hunger Force. Comedy Central is a channel that's NOT for kids, so is [adult swim]. [adult swim] might syndicate Comedy Central's new Fritz the Cat TV show soon.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.8.27.98 (talk) 18:03, 16 March 2013 (UTC) 

Fritz the Cat should also be produced by PFFR (a.k.a. "PFFFR"). PFFR (PFFFR) is mostly PG-13, R, & NC-17. PFFR did make Wonder Showzen for MTV2, Delocated New York, The Heart, She Holler, and Xavier: Renegade Angel for [adult swim]. So now PFFR will produce Fritz the Cat for Comedy Central.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.8.27.98 (talk) 18:09, 16 March 2013 (UTC) 

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Fritz the Cat. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/6ADt9yaLh?url=http://ofcs.rottentomatoes.com/pages/pr/top100animated to http://ofcs.rottentomatoes.com/pages/pr/top100animated
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:00, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Fritz the Cat. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110317032935/http://rcrumb.com/history/history5.htm to http://rcrumb.com/history/history5.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:51, 12 May 2017 (UTC)