# Talk:Meitnerium

http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S0219633610005840
http://dx.doi.org/0256-307X/27/6/062502
http://dx.doi.org/10.1595/147106708X297486
http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S0218301307006411
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.60.021301
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0168-9002(93)90529-Q
http://dx.doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2008-10584-7

The most stable known isotope, meitnerium-278, has a half-life of 7.6 seconds
Except if you look at the table of isotopes in the article, then it is 4 seconds. Or in the German wikipedia, then it is 30 minutes (although they state meitnerium-276 is the most stable isotope).
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meitnerium
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liste_der_Isotope/7._Periode#109_Meitnerium
77.182.66.75 (talk) 17:17, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

The half-lives up in this region of the nuclide chart are not known very well. I will look and see which is the latest value, but it may change significantly in the future. Double sharp (talk) 00:03, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

Is MtF6 a Compound?Porygon-Z 21:17, 10 March 2019 (UTC)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Porygon-Z474 (talk • contribs)  

It would be, but it hasn't yet been synthesised. Double sharp (talk) 03:21, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
OK, It's just all too confusing with the "should be, could be, and would be." Porygon-Z 13:42, 28 March 2019 (UTC)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Porygon-Z474 (talk • contribs)  

File:Periodic table large.svg presents a atomic mass of (268), but the current version of this article says (278). Is the File incorrect? Mateussf (talk) 13:54, 19 June 2024 (UTC)

The file is outdated. Based on current data, the most stable known isotope is unambiguously 278Mt. Values are similarly incorrect for several other superheavy elements. Complex/Rational 15:06, 19 June 2024 (UTC)