# Talk:Mole Hunt

This review is transcluded from Talk:Mole Hunt/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 17:44, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

This article is in decent shape, but it needs more work before it becomes a Good Article.
Is it well written?
A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct: 
In the Plot summary, "...he is called into his mother and boss Malory", is "office" missing in the sentence? At the moment, the sentence reads odd. In the Production section, "In order to create consistency between the separate animators, the artists takes photographs of each actor and utilize Adobe Illustrator to trace over them as a base for each actor's character", do you mean ---> "In order to create consistency between the separate animators, the artists take photographs of each actor and utilize Adobe Illustrator to trace over them as a base for each actor's character"?
 Done The Flash I am Jack's complete lack of surprise 21:31, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
Check.
B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation: 
You might want to have a consistency with "season five" and "season 5". In the Reception section, the Brian Lowry review, the two hyphens should be changed to a spaced en-dash or unspace em-dash, for more on that go here.
 Done The Flash I am Jack's complete lack of surprise 21:31, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
Check.
Is it verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check?
A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline: 

B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose): 

C. It contains no original research: 

D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism: 

Is it broad in its coverage?
A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic: 

B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style): 

Is it neutral?
It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each: 

Is it stable?
It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute: 
Not that good.
Let me just address this first. This has actually been taken care of (I believe) through a calm and civil discussion located here and here. The Flash I am Jack's complete lack of surprise 20:28, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
As long as it resolved, then there's no problem. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 22:41, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content: 
File:Archer pilot.jpg needs a lower resolution.
 Done The Flash I am Jack's complete lack of surprise 21:31, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
Check.
B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions: 

Overall:
Pass or Fail: 
If the concerns above can be answered, I will pass the article. Good luck with improving this article!
--  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 17:44, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the review! :) The Flash I am Jack's complete lack of surprise 21:31, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
You're welcome. Thank you to SuperFlash for getting the stuff I left at the talkpage, cause I have gone off and passed the article to GA. Congrats. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 21:44, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
Thanks again! :) The Flash I am Jack's complete lack of surprise 22:06, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Mole Hunt. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100122153831/http://www.hollywoodreporter.com:80/hr/tv-reviews/archer-tv-review-1004058474.story to http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/tv-reviews/archer-tv-review-1004058474.story
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 06:31, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Mole Hunt. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100212063826/http://www.fox4kc.com:80/wdaf-story-trinity-animation-archer-010510,0,1725954.story to http://www.fox4kc.com/wdaf-story-trinity-animation-archer-010510,0,1725954.story
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 05:44, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Mole Hunt. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.fox4kc.com/wdaf-story-trinity-animation-archer-010510%2C0%2C1725954.story
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100201024835/http://archer.blogs.fxnetworks.com/2009/09/21/hey-everyone/ to http://archer.blogs.fxnetworks.com/2009/09/21/hey-everyone/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:17, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Mole Hunt. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100218072659/http://www.tvguidemagazine.com/matt-roush-daily-review/thursdays-laughs-and-thrills-2391.html to http://www.tvguidemagazine.com/matt-roush-daily-review/thursdays-laughs-and-thrills-2391.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:05, 4 February 2018 (UTC)