# Talk:Italian monitor Faà di Bruno

This review is transcluded from Talk:Italian monitor Faà di Bruno/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: CPA-5 (talk · contribs) 14:57, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
Claim my seat here. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 14:57, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

GM 194 was captured by the Germans after the Italian Armistice Pipe Germans to Nazi Germany.
puppet Repubblica Sociale Italiana (Italian Social Republic) that they installed afterwards British afterwards.
She displaced 2,854 long tons (2,900 t), with a length between perpendiculars of 55.56 meters (182 ft 3 in) Tonne should be primary here.
Many navies continued to use long tons after they went metric because that's how standard displacement was defined
She was fitted with four 40-caliber 76.2 mm (3 in) Ansaldo anti-aircraft guns Add an "AA" after "anti-aircraft".
water-cooled 40 mm (1.6 in) 40 mm (1.6 in) Vickers-Terni 1915/1917 light AA guns Two 40 mm (1.6 in)s?
Ooops.
she bombarded Austro-Hungarian positions with little noticeable effect Link Austro-Hungarian.
What did she do between August 1917 and 13 November 1924?
No idea.
What happened after she got decommissioned in November 1924?
Kept in reserve, I guess.
Genoa is overlinked.
the link in the lede is actually to the bombardment, not the city.
@Sturmvogel 66: No, It's still overlinked. Look at the sentences World War II and was towed to Genoa and where in the lead and in She was towed from Venice to Genoa, where she remained in the body. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 19:50, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
Got it.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 22:55, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
GM 194 was scuttled in Savona at the end of the war and was subsequently scrapped Why did she scuttled? What happened?
No edit wars.
Infobox

The displacement isn't the same in both the infobox and the body.
The 381 mm gun isn't mentioned in the body.
British draught.
Dammit
Sources

Google Books claim that Brescia's book year was 2013, not 2012. Which one is correct?
2012
Gardiner 1992's title should be "The Eclipse of the Big Gun: The Warship, 1906-45".
"Conway's All the World's Fighting Ships: 1906-1922" --> "Conway's All the World's Fighting Ships: 1906-1921" typo.
Ordovini and Trawick ISSNs are the same as the Clerici.
ISSNs are for the magazine, not the issue
No OR.
The rest looks good to me and are reliable and academic.
Images

Looks good to me.
That's anything from me. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 14:41, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

Thanks, man.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 17:00, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
Looks good to go. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 08:56, 12 September 2019 (UTC)