# Talk:Kent vs Lancashire at Canterbury

There's a bit of a disagreement on the actual sale price of the painting in 2006. FN2, the BBC "Auction feat" piece, clearly has the price as £680,000, as does FN11's "Market news". However, the other sources have it as £600,000, which is £80,000 lower. These include FN1 (which has the lower amount in its headline), FN3, FN7, and FN12. It would be a good idea to try to find another source, perhaps less contemporaneous, that might break this conflict. BlueMoonset (talk) 03:25, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Kent vs Lancashire at Canterbury/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Adam Cuerden (talk · contribs) 14:44, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
First of all, a mathematical error: 14/18*100% is 77.77777777...%, this rounds to 77.78%, not 77.77%.
A spot check found a little bit of close paraphrasing: 

That's a bit problematic, though it's borderline, not definitely across the line. Still, a copyedit to reduce that would help a lot. I should probably do a full source check, though, given that, but I'll wait until you give the all-clear. Adam Cuerden (talk) 15:24, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

@Adam Cuerden: I've changed the wording and fixed the percentages.  The C of E   God Save the Queen! (talk) 22:01, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
I've done some spot checks and failed to find any more close paraphrasing. I'm quite happy to promote this. Adam Cuerden (talk) 11:21, 21 June 2014 (UTC)
Promoted.
There is a bit more information in the sources, by the way, so it might be good to expand this a bit more before FA. Adam Cuerden (talk) 11:23, 21 June 2014 (UTC)