# Talk:Malawi at the 2016 Summer Paralympics

This review is transcluded from Talk:Malawi at the 2016 Summer Paralympics/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Hawkeye7 (talk · contribs) 19:44, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Looks good.
Is it well written?
A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct: 

B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation: 

Is it verifiable with no original research?
A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline: 

B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines: 

C. It contains no original research: 

D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism: 

Is it broad in its coverage?
A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic: 

B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style): 

Is it neutral?
It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each: 

Is it stable?
It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute: 

Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content: 

B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions: 

Overall:
Pass or Fail: 

Comments
Article meets the GA standard. The story of this article is actually pretty common. Several countries have been unable to compete in the past due to lack of funds, but the reader may not realise how paltry the sums we are taking about are; just a few thousand dollars. Malawi was nearly unable to compete again in Rio because due to problems in Brazil, funding was not available with just days to go; the IPC managed to resolve the situation. The wildcards are controversial in these countries, because they do not always allow for their best athletes to be sent. In particular, women athletes are more likely to receive a wildcard as the IPC attempts to redress the gender imbalance.  Hawkeye7 (discuss) 19:44, 12 October 2017 (UTC)