# Talk:HTC Dream

How do people feel about removing most of the software section.  This section is pretty much describing android and nothing specific to the dream.  We should just mention that it runs Android for the most part. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chrismiceli (talk • contribs) 04:48, 27 October 2009 (UTC) 

Does MMS actually work for anyone without a data plan?  The instructions in the link do not work.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.167.66.135 (talk) 05:34, 9 November 2009 (UTC) 

According to the article/tech specs, this phone overlaps with the iPhone's connectivity:
G1--
GSM 850 900 1800 1900 MHz GPRS/EDGE
Dual band UMTS 1700 2100 MHz HSDPA/HSUPA 
iPhone--
Quad band GSM 850 900 1800 1900 MHz GPRS/EDGE
3G also includes
Tri band UMTS 850 1900 2100 MHz HSDPA

Does that mean that one can get the same "3g speeds" for just raw upstream/downstream data on the G1 that one gets on the iPhone?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.153.29.23 (talk) 05:08, 15 April 2010 (UTC) 

I am expecting to find a difference between Apple and Google in that if you use the Android SDK and associated tools, you can get root access, unlike with iOS which requires a jailbreak. My experience now though with current SDK against a phone with R30 but older doesn't necessarily apply to the situation when the device was new 2 years ago. 72.228.177.92 (talk) 19:57, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:HTC Dream/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Zach Vega (talk · contribs) 00:15, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

My initial impression with this article is that it's very strong, but my opinion often changes as I get further into the review.
Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose is clear and concise, without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors: 

B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists: 
The lead section needs to talk about the hardware and go into the software a little bit more.
...And it now does.
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. Has an appropriate reference section: 

B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary: 
The refs are a mess. The dates are inconsistent in format, there's dead links, and work and publisher are mixed up all the time.
Some problems remain, but much better.
C. No original research: 

Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects: 
Yes, it's good with scope.
B. Focused: 
Pretty good job on this.
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias: 

Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc: 
No edit wars or vandalism. Good.
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content: 
All images are from Wikimedia Commons.
B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions: 
You have a photo of the phone running Android 1.6, and a photo of Android 1.6. Redundant much? Also, try to find one or two more photos. This isn't required to pass GAN, just a nice addition.
This can be dealt with outside of the GAN.
Overall:
Pass or Fail: 
The article is going pretty well, it's just that we have a few more issues to take care of. Zach Vega (talk to me) 00:15, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
Fixed. ViperSnake151  Talk   00:30, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
Good job on improving the article! Zach Vega (talk to me) 19:00, 19 October 2013 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on HTC Dream. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090213222858/http://www.era.pl:80/pl/indywidualni/telefony/erag1/oferta to http://www.era.pl/pl/indywidualni/telefony/erag1/oferta
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 17:46, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
TTcoin 103.190.23.241 (talk) 21:29, 1 December 2024 (UTC)