# Talk:Black cuckoo-dove

This review is transcluded from Talk:Black cuckoo-dove/GA2. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Wretchskull (talk · contribs) 16:22, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
A rather small article. No need to wait long to get a review.

Taxonomy and systematics
Link subspecies.
Done.
Vocalizations
Is there an audio file of the vocalizations available online? That would definitely be useful.
Added xeno-canto link.
Behavior and ecology
Link subcanopy.
Done.
General
The article is neutral and does not contain any ongoing edit wars or discussions.
The lede image is appropriately licensed.
Broadness, neutrality and WP:SUMMARY are met.
Anything of significance here?
No, but I've done a (significant) bit of searching and added some more taxonomy.
References
No copyvio found
Ref 1 and 7 are exactly the same.
Merged.
Spotchecks:
Jobling ref supports all cited text.
IOC ref supports all cited text (ref 3a). As for ref 3b, I assume that the fact that there isn't a comment about subspecies means that there are none for that particular species.
Avibase ref supports all cited text.
The Gibbs et al. book needs pages each time it is cited. Perhaps convert them to shortened footnotes and put the book in a bibliography section. AGF that it supports all cited text.
Baptista et al. ref supports all cited text.
IUCN ref supports all cited text.
Kaszewska et al. ref supports all cited text.
@AryKun: Ping me when you're done. Wretchskull (talk) 16:24, 1 January 2022 (UTC)

@Wretchskull:, I've addressed all your concerns. AryKun (talk) 07:25, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
@AryKun: The article has been promoted to GA. Wretchskull (talk) 08:47, 2 January 2022 (UTC)