# Talk:Abbotsford Bridge

This review is transcluded from Talk:Abbotsford Bridge/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Fredddie (talk · contribs) 22:41, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
I will review the article shortly. –Fredddie™ 22:41, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar):  b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): 
The lead seems a little short.  There is a long history section yet there is only one sentence of history in the lead.
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 

It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 

It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 

It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 

Overall:
Pass/Fail: 
Overall pretty good, but I think the lead needs to reflect the length of the history section. –Fredddie™ 01:23, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
 Done - Has been expanded, if you think it requires further expansion let me know (and some pointers of what needs more focus) -- Nbound (talk) 04:38, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

That's more like it.  Passing now. –Fredddie™ 04:43, 16 September 2013 (UTC)