# Talk:2001 Rockingham 500

This review is transcluded from Talk:2001 Rockingham 500/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 15:16, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

I will be reviewing this against the GA criteria as part of a GAN sweep. I'll leave some comments soon. JAGUAR  15:16, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguations: No links found.
Linkrot: No linkrot found in this article.


### Checking against the GA criteria
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar):  b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): 
"Bräck, the season points leader heading into the race was awarded the pole position" - might read better with em dashes, but feel free to ignore...
 Done MWright96 (talk) 21:34, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
"The race was due to be held over 210 laps originally but was reduced to 168" - is there a given reason?
It was the event's schedule had to be compacted because of the problems in the previous two days MWright96 (talk) 21:42, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
" and was held on 22 September at the Rockingham Motor Speedway in Corby, Northamptonshire, England, United Kingdom" - too many. I would personally just write "Corby, Northamptonshire", but I'll leave it up to you
I've removed United Kingdom from the sentence. MWright96 (talk) 21:34, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
"Kniefel had reduced the number of laps to be run from 168 to 140 because of the danger from fading sunlight" - this could be mentioned in the lead also
 Done MWright96 (talk) 21:34, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 
No original research found.
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 

It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 

It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 

Overall:
Pass/Fail: 

This meets the GA criteria as it is. Couldn't find anything wrong with it! JAGUAR  21:11, 31 October 2016 (UTC)