# Talk:2016 Austrian Grand Prix

This review is transcluded from Talk:2016 Austrian Grand Prix/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: MWright96 (talk · contribs) 14:24, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
Will have a look at this. MWright96 (talk) 14:24, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose):  b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): 

It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 

It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 

It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 

It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate 

use with suitable captions): 

Overall:
Pass/Fail: 

no dab links


### Lead
"and marks the thirtieth running of the Austrian Grand Prix" - Marked since the race was held in the past
Remove the link to Austria in the prose and infobox


### Championship
Wikilink both the Drivers' and Constructors' Championships


### Circuit changes
Spell out the FIA in full


### Free practice
"with Vettel and Kimi Räikkönen third and fourth respectively" - a comma is needed at the end of this sentence
Delink Max Verstappen since he's already link in the circuit changes sub-section
Link gravel trap to Run-off area
Link intermediate tyres to Rain tyre
Fernando Alonso is not linked


### Qualifying
Delink Nico Hülkenberg, Romain Grosjean
Spell out Bottas as Valteeri Bottas since it is the first time he is mentioned and add a wikilink
Same for Felipe Massa


### Race
All mentions of the word "pitted" should be "made a pit stop" to reduce motorsport jargon


### Post-race
"Their head of motorsport," - I think director of motorsport would be better
Captialise constructors'
"on now 295 to 192 points." - swap the words "now" and "on"


### Classification (Qualifying)
The fourth note has a citation needed tag


### References
no dead links. However it states the three Associated Press sources are "expiring news links". Can they be archived?
On hold until the points have been actioned. MWright96 (talk) 16:03, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

@MWright96: Thank you for your review! Unfortunately, I did not get around to deal with all points so far and I will fly to Hungary tomorrow, where I'll have no internet. Could you leave this review open until, say, the 26th? Zwerg Nase (talk) 19:14, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
@Zwerg Nase: Yes, I can do that. :) MWright96 (talk) 19:19, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
@MWright96: I'm afraid I'll need the weekend as well, I am swamped right now... Zwerg Nase (talk) 20:55, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
@Zwerg Nase: Very well. MWright96 (talk) 20:57, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
@MWright96: Thank you for your patience! I took care of everything now except for capitalizing "constructors'". The reason behind that is while Drivers' Championship is a set term and therefore in capital letters, the equivalent with "standings" is not. Does that make sense? Zwerg Nase (talk) 08:28, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
@Zwerg Nase:. I understand. Not a serious issue but can now promote this to GA. MWright96 (talk) 08:36, 28 August 2016 (UTC)