# Talk:1920 Cleveland Tigers (NFL) season

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of 1920 Cleveland Tigers (NFL) season's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "hist2":
From 1920 Buffalo All-Americans season: NFL History 2003, p. 2
From 1920 Canton Bulldogs season: NFL History (2003), p. 2

Reference named "archives":
From 1920 Chicago Tigers season: "1920 Chicago Tigers (APFA)". The Pro Football Archives. Maher Sports Media. Retrieved December 6, 2012. {{cite web}}: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |work= (help)
From 1920 Akron Pros season: "1920 Akron Pros". The Pro Football Archives. Maher Sports Media. Retrieved April 1, 2012. {{cite web}}: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |work= (help)
From 1920 Buffalo All-Americans season: "1920 Buffalo All-Americans (APFA)". The Pro Football Archives. Maher Sports Media. Retrieved October 6, 2012.
From 1920 Dayton Triangles season: "1920 Dayton Triangles (APFA)". The Pro Football Archives. Maher Sports Media. Retrieved September 18, 2012. {{cite web}}: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |work= (help)
From 1920 Hammond Pros season: "1920 Hammond Pros (APFA)". The Pro Football Archives. Maher Sports Media. Retrieved November 4, 2012. {{cite web}}: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |work= (help)
From 1920 Muncie Flyers season: "1920 Muncie Flyers". The Pro Football Archives. Maher Sports Media. Retrieved August 31, 2012. {{cite web}}: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |work= (help)

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 10:47, 6 December 2012 (UTC)

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of 1920 Cleveland Tigers (NFL) season's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "nflhist":
From 1920 Hammond Pros season: NFL History 2003, pp. 1–7
From 1920 Columbus Panhandles season: "1920 American Professional Football Association". NFL History. March 10, 2003. {{cite web}}: |archive-url= requires |url= (help); Missing or empty |url= (help)
From 1920 Detroit Heralds season: NFL History (2003), pp. 1–7

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 20:45, 6 December 2012 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:1920 Cleveland Tigers (NFL) season/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Dom497 (talk · contribs) 21:19, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality: 

B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists: 

Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. Has an appropriate reference section: 
See comment section.
B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary: 

C. No original research: 

Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects: 

B. Focused: 

Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias: 

Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc: 

Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content: 

B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions: 
See comment section.
Overall:
Pass or Fail: 
On hold just for so the last comment can be addressed.--Dom497 (talk) 21:34, 11 January 2013 (UTC) Pass!--Dom497 (talk) 00:21, 12 January 2013 (UTC)


### Comments
Access dates are missing on several of the references/notes.--Dom497 (talk) 21:25, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
I have added access dates.—Michael Jester (talk · contribs) 23:23, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
The book refs in the Note section don't have access dates.--Dom497 (talk) 00:07, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
Which ones? If you're talking about (for example) "PFRA Research 1980, pp. 3–4", I'm using the template {{harvnb}}, which doesn't have an accessdate parameter.—Michael Jester (talk · contribs) 01:57, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
Ok, its fine then.--Dom497 (talk) 21:33, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
In the roster section, readers looking at an article like this for the first time will likely not know what LOE-DE, ROE-DE, etc, mean. Spell out the full position and you can put the short form in brackets if you wish.--Dom497 (talk) 21:25, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
I have added a table instead. Will this suffice?—Michael Jester (talk · contribs) 23:23, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Yup, thats fine!--Dom497 (talk) 00:07, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
Though the image section of the review is a pass, try to find an image of the team or something. I know its 1920 so it may be pretty hard but just give it a shot.--Dom497 (talk) 21:27, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
I found a picture of the stadium. Google Images did not provide much.—Michael Jester (talk · contribs) 23:23, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Good enough.--Dom497 (talk) 00:07, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
Week 3 has no refs.--Dom497 (talk) 00:08, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
Added refs.—Michael Jester (talk · contribs) 01:57, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
Standings section has no refs.--Dom497 (talk) 00:08, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
Added a reference.—Michael Jester (talk · contribs) 02:30, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
"They then invited other professional teams to a second meeting on September 17." Source?--Dom497 (talk) 00:16, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
Added source.—Michael Jester (talk · contribs) 02:30, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
"At that meeting...", The first or second?--Dom497 (talk) 00:16, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
The second. Fixed.—Michael Jester (talk · contribs) 02:30, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
Any refs that show that there were no games for the team for weeks 1,2,11,12,13?--Dom497 (talk) 21:31, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Yeah, there's a reference at the top of the table (NFL History 2003, pp. 1–7). That shows all the games for the entire 1920 season for all teams.—Michael Jester (talk · contribs) 22:28, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Whoops, didn't see that!--Dom497 (talk) 00:21, 12 January 2013 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on 1920 Cleveland Tigers (NFL) season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.profootballresearchers.org/Coffin_Corner/03-02-059.pdf
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140808122855/http://www.profootballresearchers.org/Coffin_Corner/06-01-173.pdf to http://www.profootballresearchers.org/Coffin_Corner/06-01-173.pdf
Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/5zNOTWbno?url=http://www.profootballresearchers.org/Coffin_Corner/02-08-038.pdf to http://www.profootballresearchers.org/Coffin_Corner/02-08-038.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:08, 14 June 2017 (UTC)