# Talk:1991–92 South-West Indian Ocean cyclone season

This review is transcluded from Talk:1991–92 South-West Indian Ocean cyclone season/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Yellow Evan (talk · contribs) 19:19, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

Mention cyclone year in the lead. YE Pacific Hurricane 19:19, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
Why? It's different than it is now, and back then differed between JTWC and MFR. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk)  19:34, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
"The second, designated Tropical Depression A2 by the Météo-France office (MFR) on Réunion, passed north of Madagascar on October 16 before weakening." why do you mention the second and not the 1st and 3rd. YE Pacific Hurricane 19:19, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
It passed near Madagascar. The others remained away from land. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk)  19:34, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
" In April, another cyclone – Jane – crossed from the Australian region and was renamed Irna, which exited the basin on April 19 to end tropical activity within the basin." "which" just does not sound right here and makes it confusion. Was it final storm of the SWIO or AUS season? Does
the basin" refer to the AUS or SWIO? YE Pacific Hurricane 19:19, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

Both, actually. But I changed one of the basins to region and clarified it reentered the Australian region. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk)  19:34, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
Please split the "Storms" section into an SS to make it like every other normal season article. I hate the way it is now. YE Pacific Hurricane 19:19, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
Meow. OK. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk)  19:34, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
Leave a note about the MFR/JTWC 1/10 min thingy; IMO, it is better than sticking in the middle of a storm section. YE Pacific Hurricane 19:19, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
I just clarify every time I mention wind speeds. Is that a problem? The 2001–02 South-West Indian Ocean cyclone season doesn't do that. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk)  19:34, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
"While moving over northern Madagascar, Bryna dropped heavy rainfall.[2]" mind squeezing this into the above paragraph? YE Pacific Hurricane 19:19, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
Not at all. I was hoping to find more impact, but found nothing in Google News, a generic Google search, Google books, Lexis Nexis, or Facebook. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk)  19:34, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
You should link to the TS scales page somewhere in Harriet-Heather's section. The average couch man along the Gulf coast does not know what "tropical cyclone status" is for instance. If you did already somehwere, then, I missed it :P YE Pacific Hurricane 19:19, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
I do link to TC scales in Harriet's section already :P --♫ Hurricanehink (talk)  19:34, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
Make the "other storms" section a level 3 header, not a level 2. YE Pacific Hurricane 19:19, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
Thanks, oops. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk)  19:34, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
Don't make one as this is a side note, but we should have consistent over whether we should have SE chart's. YE Pacific Hurricane 19:19, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
Ehh, I don't think consistency is necessary. They're ideal when there are a lot of land impacting storms, but this season wasn't like that. There's nothing to compile in terms of deaths and damage. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk)  19:34, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
Not a bad start for the year. YE Pacific Hurricane 19:19, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

Thanks! --♫ Hurricanehink (talk)  19:34, 3 January 2014 (UTC)