# Talk:2000 Malaysian Grand Prix

This review is transcluded from Talk:2000 Malaysian Grand Prix/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Nascarking (talk · contribs) 21:09, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar):  b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): 
Numbers between one and twelve should be spelled out.
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 

It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 

It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 

It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 

Overall:
Pass: 
Fix the numbers issue addressed in point one and it's a pass. After reading over the article again, there's no problem with the numbers. I hereby give 2000 Malaysian Grand Prix a pass. It's now a Good Article.--Nascar king 21:12, 8 April 2015 (UTC)