# Talk:Bjaðmunjo Mýrjartaksdóttir

This review is transcluded from Talk:Bjaðmunjo Mýrjartaksdóttir/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Caponer (talk · contribs) 17:38, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
Brianann MacAmhlaidh, I will undertake a thorough and comprehensive review and re-review of this article within the next 48 hours. Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns in the meantime. -- Caponer (talk) 17:38, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
Brianann MacAmhlaidh, I've completed my review and re-review and find that your article meets GA criteria, but I do have a few comments that should be addressed prior to its passage. Thanks again! -- Caponer (talk) 17:46, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar):  b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): 

It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 

It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 

It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 

It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 

Overall:
Pass/Fail: 

Lede

Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Lead section, the lede of this article adequately defines Bjaðmunjo, establishes the necessary context for Bjaðmunjo, and explains why Bjaðmunjo is notable.
The template is formatted well, its contents are cited within the prose and by the references below.
Consider wiki-linking "Old Norse" and "Gaelic".
Done.--Brianann MacAmhlaidh (talk) 23:55, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
Remove the extra "Sigurðr" mention from the final sentence of the paragraph.
Done.--Brianann MacAmhlaidh (talk) 23:55, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
The lede is otherwise well-written, consists of content that is adequately sourced and verifiable, and I have no other comments or questions for this section.
Background

The map of locations relating to Bjaðmunjo's life and times are licensed CC BY-SA 4.0 and is therefore acceptable for use here.
This section is well-written, consists of content that is adequately sourced and verifiable, and I have no other comments or questions for this section.
Marriage

The image of the excerpt from folio 32r of Bodleian Library is released into the public domain and is therefore free to use here.
This section is well-written, consists of content that is adequately sourced and verifiable, and I have no other comments or questions for this section.
Ramifications

This section is well-written, consists of content that is adequately sourced and verifiable, and I have no comments or questions for this section.
Brianann MacAmhlaidh, thank you for addressing my above concerns. Upon my review and re-review of your article, I find that it more than meets GA criteria and hereby pass it to GA status. Thanks again for all your tremendous work on this article and for your continued contributions to Wikipedia! -- Caponer (talk) 20:59, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Bjaðmunjo Mýrjartaksdóttir. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130412173927/http://www.vsnrweb-publications.org.uk/Saga-Book%20XXIX.pdf to http://www.vsnrweb-publications.org.uk/Saga-Book%20XXIX.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:12, 3 November 2016 (UTC)