# Talk:2016 Milan–San Remo

This review is transcluded from Talk:2016 Milan–San Remo/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: MPJ-DK (talk · contribs) 01:38, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

I will be picking up the review of this one - both for the Wiki Cup and the GA cup as well, for my fellow Wiki Cup competitor. I will be making my review comments over the next couple of days.
Side note, I would love some input on a Featured List candidate, Mexican National Light Heavyweight Championship. I am not asking for Quid pro Quo, but all help is appreciated.  MPJ-US  01:38, 2 April 2016 (UTC)


### GA Toolbox
I like to get this checked out first, I have found issues using this that has led to quick fails so it's important this passes muster.

Peer review tool
No issues Y
Copyright violations Tool
Just indicating the quotes really, no problems Y
Disambiguation links
No issues Y
External links
No issues Y


### Well Written
"caused for the" should be "caused the"
"totaling" typo - should be "totalling"
No sources for that list of favorites? that needs a source or two
"Meanwhile, first crashes" should be "Meanwhile, the first crashes"
"on the other hand was" needs a comma after "hand"


### Sources/verifiable
They're looking okay to me, formatted correctly etc. Y


### Broad in coverage
Yes Y


### Neutral
Yes Y


### Stable
Fairly short lifetime so far, but nothing is looking worrysome Y


### Illustrated / Images
Yep, good Y
@Zwerg Nase: - That's my review, congratulations this is probably the least amount of comments I've ever had on a GA nomination. I am putting this on hold to allow for the corrections to be made.  MPJ-US  03:34, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
@Zwerg Nase: - Since I know you're busy I figured I would address the grammatical issues - just need some sourcing around the favorites and you have a Good Article on your hands.  MPJ-US  00:01, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
@MPJ-DK: Thanks! The sources are actually all there, mainly #3 and #13. Should they be placed differently? I put number 3 behind the sentence with Cavendish, but it applies to the previous sentence as well. Zwerg Nase (talk) 12:55, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
@Zwerg Nase: Excellent, i missed that. Well then we have a GA. Congratulations.  MPJ-US  14:55, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

Thank you very much :) I updated the class template on the talk page. Zwerg Nase (talk) 15:04, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on 2016 Milan–San Remo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160318143016/http://www.cyclingnews.com/milan-san-remo/preview/ to http://www.cyclingnews.com/milan-san-remo/preview/
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160320153316/http://www.cyclingnews.com/milan-san-remo/results/ to http://www.cyclingnews.com/milan-san-remo/results/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:05, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on 2016 Milan–San Remo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160317065655/http://www.cyclingnews.com/milan-san-remo/start-list/ to http://www.cyclingnews.com/milan-san-remo/start-list/
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160317205723/http://www.sportschau.de/weitere/radsport/greipel-faellt-mit-rippenbruch-aus-100.html to http://www.sportschau.de/weitere/radsport/greipel-faellt-mit-rippenbruch-aus-100.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:16, 22 December 2017 (UTC)