# Talk:Battle of Orbetello

This article needs a copyedit by a native English speaker.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 17:40, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

It seems to me that this article could be nominated for GA status. I'm not an editor of the article, just a person who is a part of WP Spain that looks for potential GA articles. I wasn't intentionally looking for them today (or lately, for that matter), but this article is appears to be worthy for a review. If I'm providing an inconvience for the editor(s), I apologize in advance. Thanks for reading! LeftAire (talk) 22:55, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Battle of Orbetello/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Rp0211 (talk · contribs) 19:57, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose):  b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): 
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 
Overall:
Pass/Fail: 


### Infobox
No issues


### Lead
The Battle of Orbetello (also known as the Battle of Isola del Giglio)[3] was a major naval engagement of the Franco-Spanish War of 1635, → End the first sentence here to comply with WP:BEGINNING
...when another Spanish army led by Marquis of Torrecuso and Duke of Arcos which had come from the Kingdom of Naples across the Papal States, → Add comma between "Arcos" and "which"


### Background
For this purpose was gathered in Toulon a fleet... → Fix prose of this phrase


### Battle
Fix the sentences where the sentences start with numbers that are not spelled out


### Aftermath
Fix the prose of the image description in this section to make it more understandable


### Notes
No issues


### References
No issues

After thoroughly reviewing this article, I have decided to put the article on hold at this time. I will give you the general seven days to fix these mistakes and/or address issues which you believe do not concern good article status. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask. Rp0211 (talk2me) 20:16, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

Since all issues have been addressed, I feel confident passing this article. Congratulations and keep up the good work! Rp0211 (talk2me) 18:20, 1 July 2012 (UTC)