# Talk:2016 Volta a Catalunya

This review is transcluded from Talk:2016 Volta a Catalunya/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 21:23, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

I will be reviewing this as part of a GAN sweep. I'll leave some comments soon. JAGUAR  21:23, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguations: No links found.
Linkrot: No linkrot found in this article.


### Checking against the GA criteria
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar):  b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): 
The lead summarises the article well, so no issues here. However, I would recommend moving the citations into the body per WP:LEADCITE
"This was a particular concern" - just lose 'concern' or rephrase it to This was particularly a concern
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 
No original research found.
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 

It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 

It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 

Overall:
Pass/Fail: 

This is well written, comprehensive and well sourced. It meets the criteria, so passing  JAGUAR  17:15, 22 April 2016 (UTC)