# Talk:2000 French Grand Prix

This article was automatically  assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 02:01, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:2000 French Grand Prix/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Nascarking (talk · contribs) 19:37, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar):  b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): 
Any number between one and twelve should be spelled out.
Corrected the number issue Z105space (talk) 19:52, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 

It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 

It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 

It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 
The pictures of Coulthard and Häkkinen could be moved down a little, but it's not a deal-breaker.
Done Z105space (talk) 19:52, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
Overall:
Pass: 
Just fix the minor issue with the spelling out of numbers that should be and this will be a pass.--Nascar king 19:42, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
@Nascarking: All the issues have been fixed. Z105space (talk) 19:52, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
Then I hereby give 2000 French Grand Prix a pass. It's now a Good Article.--Nascar king 19:54, 6 April 2015 (UTC)