# Talk:1981 Atlantic hurricane season

Okay I removed the note under name retirements about Katrina being retired in 2005 because a. the name Katrina has *not* been retired yet and announcements about retired names won't be made until Spring 2006 so the statement is untrue anyway. b. Even if the announcement had been made, as I said in my edit summary, retirements of names used on a list more than 20 years in the future is utterly irrelevent to the entry in question. Names to be retired are only mentioned in the entry for the year in which said name is retired. There is no need to confuse things by mentioning name retirements more than one list cycle (can't think of a better term for it) in the future! 
-Hurricane Sapphire. (cute name eh? :P)
Please use next time ~~~~ to sign in. juan andrés 02:38, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
And yeah your name is pretty fine. Would you like to help us with the Wikiproject? juan andrés 04:37, 25 January 2006 (UTC)

Tropical Storm Arlene
Tropical Storm Bret
Hurricane Cindy
Hurricane Emily
Hurricane Floyd- Can't find it as a hurricane. Hurricanehink
Tropical Storm Gert- See above. Hurricanehink
Hurricane Harvey
Hurricane Irene
Tropical Storm Jose
Hurricane Katrina
Subtropical Storm Three
All of them done. Hurricanehink 03:04, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
But why three? Maybe it is Subtropical Storm Thirteen juan andrés 04:29, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
An error with Cindy confused me. Cindy was not a Hurricane as the picture says juan andrés 04:36, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
Gert is for female, right? Because I've never heard that name before juan andrés 04:41, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
Finally, after too much trouble it;s done! juan andrés 05:08, 25 January 2006 (UTC)

Good work. Whoops on Cindy, and that Subtropical Storm was the 3rd Subtropical Storm of the season. The other two became tropical. Hurricanehink 13:42, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
I presume that's right on SS3.  I named it that because the best-track called it "SUBTROP 3". Jdorje 17:57, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
Oh I understand... juan andrés 00:37, 26 January 2006 (UTC)


### Eight
I became aware of this system today when looking for the next unnamed tropical depression to do rainfall graphics for prior to 1984.  It had significant impact in Texas, so I included it.  Expect a rainfall page for the system to be done during the afternoon and evening tomorrow.  Thegreatdr (talk) 22:38, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

It is done. Thegreatdr (talk) 22:14, 12 May 2008 (UTC)


### Two
The associated rainfall graphics will be generated tonight.  I'm digging for more information for the  prospective TC rainfall page, so it will likely be updated again sometime during the next week or so.  Thegreatdr (talk) 19:49, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

All information I can find through NCDC has now been found.  Thegreatdr (talk) 03:08, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

The only way to get to 21 this season, which was stated in the Monthly Weather Review tropical systems article in 1988 for 1981, is to include the 3 extra tropical depressions in the non-developmental database, which is not publicly released and therefore not able to be referenced.  Of these 3, two impacted North America (one the East coast, the other Mexico) and will likely have rainfall files/pages dedicated to them in the next couple month or two.  This means HPC will end up being the source of the information, rather than NHC.  Oy.  Thegreatdr (talk) 20:55, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

Once we find references for TD7, TD15, and the unusualness of the Bret landfall upon the Delmarva, I think we can consider GACing this puppy.  Thegreatdr (talk) 19:47, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

References should be taken care of now.  It is GACed.  Thegreatdr (talk) 03:07, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

Please, consider edits carefully regarding Bret's impact on the Delmarva within TC history.  Hurricanes have impacted that peninsula since at least 1878.  Thegreatdr (talk) 01:18, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:1981 Atlantic hurricane season/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
This page is for the review of the 1981 Atlantic hurricane season article.  Thegreatdr (talk) 18:30, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose):  b (MoS): 
The prose is generally decent, but there are some places with awkward working. One of the major problems here are the MoS breaches. Please make sure all numbers less than 10 are spelled out. The lead needs to be expanded, as well. Also, why is subtropical in italics in the Arlene section?
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 
Here's where the biggest problem is. The entire season summary section needs to be sourced, and at least every paragraph throughout the entire article needs a source. I'm seeing entire strorms' sections with only a single ref.
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 
I'd really like to see mroe info. The Katrina section, especially, should be expanded with some more impact information. Also, isn't there any rainfall information for Bret?
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 
There are some POVish words in the article. For example, in "very heavy rainfall...", "very" is POVish.
It is stable.
No edit wars etc.: 

It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 

Overall:
Pass/Fail: 

Good work, but there are too many issues to be passed at the present time. I'm afraid I'm going to have to fail it. When the issues are fixed, feel free to take it back to GAN. Good luck, Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 00:50, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

While I agree with parts of your review (and thanks for reviewing it), I take exception with more info being needed for each storm.  According to the project page, Season articles should include an overall summary plus a short summary for each storm, with a link to the storm page where appropriate.  I guess my question to you is what constitutes "short' in your eyes.  If you want me to source the summary, which is already sourced well in the article below, that's an easy fix.  I would say very easy, but that would violate POV.  hehehee  Thegreatdr (talk) 22:20, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
Well, in my opinion, since storms like Irene and Bret don't have main articles, they should have more info than the sections with articles (damaging storms excluded). Maybe 5–10 sentences, depending on the length. The lead should be two paragraphs, as well. Yeah, the referencing should be very easy. :) Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 22:27, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
The referencing is fixed.  I'll get to the other issues after dinner.  Thegreatdr (talk) 22:49, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
It's looking better already. You should also fix this: Dennis made landfall in Florida, moved back offshore before a final landfall in Virginia. Briefly becoming a hurricane. Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 22:52, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
Took out the couple POVish words mentioned.  Made the wording change just suggested.  Numbers less than 10 which are whole, and not part of a convert template, are now worded out.  Added a couple lines to the lead.  Since Katrina has its own article, I don't see why that section needs to be expanded since all relevant information is included in the main storm article.  The one thing I can't figure out is how to edit that button bar at the bottom.  The designations listed on it are wrong, and don't fit the article.  Thegreatdr (talk) 00:30, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
It looks much better. I still think the lead should be two paragraphs, though, as that is essential to a GA. Also, I don't think the button bar matters that much. Good luck, Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 00:36, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
Added another line to the lead, split it into two paragraphs, and fixed button bar.  Thegreatdr (talk) 13:40, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
Well, I didn't mean split the lead into two paragraphs as I meant expand the lead. You might want to take a look at WP:LEAD#Length. According to that, the lead should be about three&ndas;four paragraphs. (Sorry if I'm being a pain, but I just want to keep the GA standard high.) Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 13:48, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
This came up during the tropical cyclone FAC review, but I'm willing to rehash it here.  The article length may be 44 kb, but at least 10 kb of it is references according to the first page of the article history.  Should we really be providing extra lead text for reference length?  Because of the preferred format within the Tropical Cyclone Wikiproject for annual articles, we have the same information described four times within this article, with summaries in the lead, season summary, and annual summary table.  I don't think they had this repetitive article/information structure in mind MoS-wise when they made up the length of lead rules.  I've posted a message in the good article nomination talk room to see if MoS was designed to cover this type of article structure.  If I include more text in the lead, it will mirror the season summary section, and the way I read MoS, it is against excessive repetition. Thegreatdr (talk) 14:19, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
←I suppose you're right. It now looks good enough to pass...Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 14:37, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

Added another line to the lead.  After thinking it over, it seems like the season summary recommended within season articles should really serve as their lead.  Added a couple lines regarding Bret's rainfall impact per your suggestion.  Thegreatdr (talk) 15:30, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
Great, it looks good. :) This may be FACable with some more referencing and expanding. Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 15:37, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
Mitch was looking for "help" in getting this to FA.  I'll probably leave the rest of the work to him.  I've got 40+ other orphaned articles which I've previously contributed to that still need to reach GA.  Thegreatdr (talk) 16:43, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/rsad/gibbs/1981/205/img-1981-07-24-18-goe-4-vs.html#image
In 1981 Atlantic hurricane season on 2011-05-25 04:56:43, 404 Not Found
In 1981 Atlantic hurricane season on 2011-06-24 05:28:43, 404 Not Found
--JeffGBot (talk) 05:28, 24 June 2011 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on 1981 Atlantic hurricane season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080201121723/http://www.fema.gov:80/business/nfip/statistics/sign1000.shtm to http://www.fema.gov/business/nfip/statistics/sign1000.shtm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 05:16, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

I'm continuing my work with historic cyclone tracks and... I've come across some depressions in the IBTrACS database which have accompanying ATCF best track files, which make the numbering system used on this article incorrect. Not sure how they should go about being updated or how many seasons may be affected by this. Some brief reading further up in the talk page seems to indicate these storms weren't in the archives previously, but I'm not too sure about that. Any info? 
An example: 1
-- atomic7732 10:13, 11 August 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on 1981 Atlantic hurricane season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160108051640/http://www.thehurricanearchive.com/Viewer.aspx?img=102966916_clean&firstvisit=true&src=search&currentResult=0&currentPage=0 to http://www.thehurricanearchive.com/Viewer.aspx?img=102966916_clean&firstvisit=true&src=search&currentResult=0&currentPage=0
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160108051640/http://www.thehurricanearchive.com/Viewer.aspx?img=112856179_clean&firstvisit=true&src=search&currentResult=1&currentPage=0 to http://www.thehurricanearchive.com/Viewer.aspx?img=112856179_clean&firstvisit=true&src=search&currentResult=1&currentPage=0
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160108051640/http://www.thehurricanearchive.com/Viewer.aspx?img=38958423_clean&firstvisit=true&src=search&currentResult=8&currentPage=0 to http://www.thehurricanearchive.com/Viewer.aspx?img=38958423_clean&firstvisit=true&src=search&currentResult=8&currentPage=0
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160108051640/http://www.thehurricanearchive.com/Viewer.aspx?img=31091212_clean&firstvisit=true&src=search&currentResult=0&currentPage=0 to http://www.thehurricanearchive.com/Viewer.aspx?img=31091212_clean&firstvisit=true&src=search&currentResult=0&currentPage=0
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160108051640/http://www.thehurricanearchive.com/Viewer.aspx?img=110385486_clean&firstvisit=true&src=search&currentResult=0&currentPage=0 to http://www.thehurricanearchive.com/Viewer.aspx?img=110385486_clean&firstvisit=true&src=search&currentResult=0&currentPage=0
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:50, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on 1981 Atlantic hurricane season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160108051640/http://www.thehurricanearchive.com/Viewer.aspx?img=25716780_clean&firstvisit=true&src=search&currentResult=0&currentPage=0 to http://www.thehurricanearchive.com/Viewer.aspx?img=25716780_clean&firstvisit=true&src=search&currentResult=0&currentPage=0
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160108051640/http://www.thehurricanearchive.com/Viewer.aspx?img=110156365_clean&firstvisit=true&src=search&currentResult=1&currentPage=0 to http://www.thehurricanearchive.com/Viewer.aspx?img=110156365_clean&firstvisit=true&src=search&currentResult=1&currentPage=0
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:50, 23 January 2018 (UTC)