# Talk:Amar la Trama

This review is transcluded from Talk:Amar la Trama/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: SMasters (talk) 07:56, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality: 
Well written with no errors. I'm impressed with this.
B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists: 
Complies to WP:MOS.
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources: 
Properly referenced.
B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary: 
One small thing. The reference for the chart performance should be placed at the chart, and not at the heading of the table. As it's a small thing, I've moved the ref, but it's worth remember for the future.
C. No original research: 

Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects: 

B. Focused: 

Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias: 
Complies to WP:NPOV.
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc: 
Article is stable.
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales: 
Images all check out.
B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions: 

Overall:
Pass or Fail: 
All in all, an almost perfect score, with a few minor issues which I have fixed. It is not a requirement, but if you have a music sample, it would be nice to include it. I am confident that the article complies with GA requirements and standards, and am happy to pass this. Well done!