# Talk:Avi Yemini

Not sure how to add this, but as his last name suggests, he is yemenite jewish, is this relevant to his early life biography? TrustyTusk (talk) 22:21, 28 June 2025 (UTC)

@TrustyTusk I don't remember seeing that printed in news reports. Do you have any sources? TarnishedPathtalk 00:45, 29 June 2025 (UTC)

This article is a good example of why so much of Wikipedia is a waste of web space, and dominated by woke, leftist editors. Anyone conservative is 'far right' and a 'provocateur'. The article repeatedly labels Yemini far right but basically gives no reasons for doing so. It also baselessly labels Rebel News 'far right'. Rebel News and Yemini are an antidote to the leftist propaganda of the MSM, and as such are very necessary. I don't say that Yemini or Rebel News are perfect, but neither are other media and reporters. Any fair minded person who actually looks at Yemini's content will find that he is generally very reasonable, and has a basis in logic and evidence for what he says. This is far more than can be said for many of those who disagree with him. I've given up fighting with other Wikipedia editors over the content of articles - it's a losing battle and I would far rather just say what I want to say in the Talk page, in the hope that some people will read it, and not just believe whatever a Wikipedia article says. Guntherklog (talk) 14:07, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

Both Yemini and Rebel being far-right are supported by a metric fucktonne of reliable sourcing. TarnishedPathtalk 22:50, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
Garbage. Just like you, these so called 'reliable sources' are leftist outlets, such as the rag The Guardian, who merely state that he is 'far right' without saying why. I've just looked at the first 3 articles provided in this article as sources for him being far right - two are from the The Guardian, all are leftist outfits. NONE of them say what he has said or done that makes him 'far right', they merely label him as such. Do you have anything? Guntherklog (talk) 04:23, 19 November 2025 (UTC)
If you think the articles are unreliable for their usage I invite you to start a discussion at the reliable sources noticeboard. TarnishedPathtalk 05:14, 19 November 2025 (UTC)
This is why Wikipedia is a waste of web space. Because you get involved in stupid arguments like this one. The  references I mentioned are NOT references at all, because a reference provides evidence for a statement made. So, what you've said is beside the point. Guntherklog (talk) 07:36, 19 November 2025 (UTC)
I'm not going to engage in your contrived argument. If you think you're right and I'm wrong, go and make a discussion about it on the noticeboard I linked above. TarnishedPathtalk 07:58, 19 November 2025 (UTC)