# Talk:Aramburu Island

This review is transcluded from Talk:Aramburu Island/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Guettarda (talk · contribs) 01:46, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Since I've already gone through this pretty carefully for the DYK, I'll give this a shot. Guettarda (talk) 01:46, 26 March 2021 (UTC)


### Lead
The lead is too short, and doesn't adequately summarise the contents of the article in a proportionate fashion.
Y jp×g 08:06, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
There shouldn't be any information in the lead that isn't in the body of the article, but it looks like the coordinates aren't anywhere else.
Y jp×g 03:47, 27 March 2021 (UTC)


### Location and access
The third sentence, Approximately one mile (1.6 km) to the east is the Tiburon Peninsula (and Tiburon itself), is a sentence fragment.
Y jp×g 03:50, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
Second paragraph: As a nature reserve... It isn't stated anywhere prior to this that the island is a nature reserve. This should either be mentioned before, or it should be stated as a fact, not mentioned in passing.
Y jp×g 03:50, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
The rest of this para is a blow-by-blow Covid account. It should be rephrased in such a way that the entire closure is discussed as one, rather than this "sequence of events" style.
Strawberry Spit is linked at least three times.
Y jp×g 08:13, 27 March 2021 (UTC)


### Animals
What's the significance of whelk snails? Are they native, naturalised, invasive? And can you link to the appropriate species (or at least genus) instead of the whelk article?
  Unfortunately, the article does not say what species they were looking for, although this can probably be found in some supplementary literature. jp×g 08:13, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
(more later) Guettarda (talk) 04:13, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

Okay, I'll respond to that when you get around to it. In the meantime I will take a crack at the stuff you've mentioned so far. jp×g 03:47, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, spelling, and grammar):  b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): 

It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):  d (copyvio and plagiarism): 

It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 

It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 

It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 

Overall:
Pass/Fail: 

Nice work. The addition of the maps really enhances my understanding. I think it would help readers a lot if you explained what the maps show in their captions. Guettarda (talk) 13:20, 27 March 2021 (UTC)