# Talk:Anime and manga fandom in Poland

Is there a reason the article uses "manga and anime" as opposed to "anime and manga"? Every other Wikipedia article about a general concept that mentions both has it with anime first (anime and manga, anime and manga fandom, anime and manga convention, glossary of anime and manga, etc), whereas with manga first it's only used in proper nouns. Link20XX (talk) 04:13, 14 October 2024 (UTC)

Yeah, I believe the title should follow the same format at the other pages. I'm gonna WP:BOLDly change the title, hopefully it's not controversial. Di (they-them) (talk) 01:08, 5 December 2024 (UTC)

I don't see an explanation of why there was a first "legal" publication... Al Begamut (talk) 14:58, 3 March 2025 (UTC)

@Al Begamut See the footnote Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 14:59, 17 May 2025 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Anime and manga fandom in Poland/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: Piotrus (talk · contribs) 12:53, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
Reviewer: Z. Patterson (talk · contribs) 14:33, 17 May 2025 (UTC)
I will be reviewing the article. Z. Patterson (talk) 14:33, 17 May 2025 (UTC)

@Piotrus: The article is stable, well-written, well-illustrated, and verifiable.  It has WP:NOR or WP:COPYVIO.  Per WP:GAN/I#R3, I made small changes by switching dates to DMY format, using Oxford spelling, and spelling out a parameter per MOS:RANGE.  I am passing this as a GA.  I think we could lengthen the article to get it to FA status.  Good work.  Z. Patterson (talk) 18:33, 17 May 2025 (UTC)