# Talk:Battle of Kliszów

The text says both armies had about 20,000 soldiers. The template says the Swedish army had 12,000 and the Polish had 24,000. Which is correct? – Alensha  talk 14:37, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

Technically this should probably be under "Battle of Kliszów" per the usual naming conventions, although this is a minor point.Volunteer Marek (talk) 02:24, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

Kliszów seen to be more frequently used and is also the name for the battle in Swedish. If you're suggesting a move, I support it. Imonoz (talk) 18:28, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

Draft has some information not in article.  Draft and article should be compared. Robert McClenon (talk) 02:28, 10 November 2022 (UTC)

Done.Alexander Alejandro (talk) 15:36, 10 November 2022 (UTC)

I've started reviewing and editing the article copy per Alexander Alejandro's request. Here are my notes so far:

Too much detail in intro? Per MOS, lead section for an article of this size should be one or two paragraphs
Flank vs wing? "Flank" sounds more appropriate when talking about maneuvers and locations, but under Line of Battle, "wing" seems more appropriate. Could use advice
Line of Battle better as a list? The Crown Army section is especially bad but the whole section seems unsuited for paragraph structure. Will review MOS
Is M in Field marshal capitalized? Likely, will confirm
Should Ryttmästare be italicized? Will review MOS
Is Cavalry General a title? Need to research
Exobiotic 💬 ✒️ 04:30, 6 June 2023 (UTC)