# Talk:Ascension Cathedral, Veliko Tarnovo

This review is transcluded from Talk:Patriarchal Cathedral of the Holy Ascension of God/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: SMasters (talk) 09:35, 25 March 2011 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose):  b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): 
Article is well written and complies to the requirements for WP:MOS.
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 
Article is properly referenced with reliable sources and has no original research.
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 
Article covers all major aspects and is focused.
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 
Article complies to WP:NPOV.
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 
Article is stable.
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 
Pictures are properly tagged and captioned.
Overall: This article is a well researched and written. I enjoyed reading it, and am confident that it meets all the requirements for a GA so I am happy to pass it. Well done. – SMasters (talk) 09:50, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
Pass/Fail: