# Talk:2011 World Snooker Championship

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on 2011 World Snooker Championship. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110414214451/http://www.cajt.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Records.html to http://www.cajt.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Records.html
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110523045039/http://www.snooker.org/plr/wc_centuries.shtml to http://www.snooker.org/plr/wc_centuries.shtml
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:02, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 6 external links on 2011 World Snooker Championship. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110427230517/http://www.worldsnooker.com/page/NewsArticles/0%2C%2C13165~2345958%2C00.html to http://www.worldsnooker.com/page/NewsArticles/0%2C%2C13165~2345958%2C00.html
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110429202539/http://www.worldsnooker.com/page/NewsArticles/0%2C%2C13165~2348379%2C00.html to http://www.worldsnooker.com/page/NewsArticles/0%2C%2C13165~2348379%2C00.html
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.worldsnooker.com/page/NewsArticles/0%2C%2C13165~2352434%2C00.html
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111016201933/http://www.worldsnooker.com/page/NewsArticles/0%2C%2C13165~2204254%2C00.html to http://www.worldsnooker.com/page/NewsArticles/0%2C%2C13165~2204254%2C00.html
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130505183302/http://www.worldsnooker.com/page/NewsArticles/0%2C%2C13165~2253477%2C00.html to http://www.worldsnooker.com/page/NewsArticles/0%2C%2C13165~2253477%2C00.html
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130505183302/http://www.worldsnooker.com/page/NewsArticles/0%2C%2C13165~2253477%2C00.html to http://www.worldsnooker.com/page/NewsArticles/0%2C%2C13165~2253477%2C00.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:39, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

World Snooker Championship 2015 Logo.png
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 21:08, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:2011 World Snooker Championship/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Mike Christie (talk · contribs) 01:23, 24 August 2022 (UTC)

I'll review this. Mike Christie (talk - contribs -  library) 01:23, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
Images are appropriately tagged.

What makes the following reliable sources?
snooker.org -- see this discussion; is there any more recent discussion approving of it?
That's quite an old discussion. I've successfully used this citation at many FACs, specifically pointing to being an award winning statistical site. According to the about us page, they were in Snooker Scene (and won website of the year in 2011), BilliardsDigest (under a different name), and commented on in the Independent). It also suggests they won a Britannia Internet Use Guide, and were linked by the BBC Education Web Guide. If the page was being used to cite controversial BLP material, I'd probably agree that it doesn't hold up, but it's generally used to cite brackets, draws and times, which otherwise would have to be cited to the event itself (which is less than ideal). Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 08:26, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
OK -- I think for statistics it should be fine. Mike Christie (talk - contribs -  library) 11:00, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
globalsnookercentre.co.uk
I've removed this one, it wasn't citing anything that wasn't otherwise cited. Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 11:02, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
FN51 is tagged as a permanent dead link.  For GA that's OK but you may want to replace it anyway.
"An audience of 3.93 million viewers watched the final session in Great Britain with 2.03 million watching the third session of the final": confusingly different uses of "final"; I had to read this a couple of times.  I think this means 3.93 million viewers watched the final session of the final.
Reworded to say fourth. Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 14:20, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
"The event was organised by the World Professional Billiards and Snooker Association."  I was going to suggest "The 2011 event was..." but presumably the WPBSA has organized it for years?  So perhaps add that to the previous sentence?
They've run the event since 1969, and the event has run since 1927. Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 14:20, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
OK; I don't think it's necessary to change it so struck. Mike Christie (talk - contribs -  library) 01:42, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
"This was the first time six century breaks had been made in a match at the event, and for a best of 25 frames match": what does the second part of this mean?  Does it mean it's the first time six century breaks had been made in a 25 frames match at any event?  If so I'd clarify.
Yeah, that's exactly what it means. I'll see if I can reword. Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 11:06, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
Suggest adding a word or to to explain what the News of the World allegations were about -- e.g. "allegations of match-fixing the previous year".
Added. Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 10:58, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
The qualifying rounds surprised me -- looks like new players joined at each qualifying round, presumably based on their ranking?  Could we add a brief explanation of how these rounds worked?
That is exactly how it works, but I can't find a specific source that states this for this specific year  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 10:58, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
Struck; it's correct as written; it's just the explanation we can't source.
-- Mike Christie (talk - contribs -  library) 12:05, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
Earwig is clean; the match it shows is to a mirror.  Spotchecks:

FN 26 cites "The first round was played from 16 to 21 April as the best of 19 frames held over two sessions": technically this is a problem because this shows the planned format, not what actually happened.  I'm not going to treat this as a failed verification on that basis but a cite after the event would be better.  However, I don't see where it states that the first round was specifically those dates -- am I missing something?
Yeah, that would be nice. I think you are missing that the dates cover which matches are played on what dates (on the second page). Matches 1-16 (the first round) are all between 16-21. Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 18:27, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
I did miss that. Mike Christie (talk - contribs -  library) 18:29, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
FN 67 cites "Higgins took a 13–12 lead after the third session of the final, which he won 6–2": verified.
FN 11 cites "In 1927, the first world championship was won by Joe Davis. The event's final took place in Camkin's Hall, Birmingham, England": verified.
-- Mike Christie (talk - contribs -  library) 01:59, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Last issue resolved; passing. Mike Christie (talk - contribs -  library) 18:29, 10 September 2022 (UTC)