# Talk:2010 Kobalt Tools 500 (Phoenix)

This review is transcluded from Talk:2010 Kobalt Tools 500 (Phoenix)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: The Bushranger (talk · contribs) 19:28, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
Overall nice work here. Just has a few quibbles that need working on.
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose):  b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): 
Nice work here. Do have a few quibbles, however. To wit:
"The standard track at Phoenix International Raceway is a four-turn short track oval that is 1 mile (1.6 km) long." - No mention of the dogleg?
How does "The back stretch, which has a dogleg shape instead of a straight..." work? -- Nascar1996(Talk • Contribs) 19:55, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
"The back stretch had a 9 degree banking." - might be better as "has 9 degrees of..."
 Done -- Nascar1996(Talk • Contribs) 19:55, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
"was eleventh and twelfth" - "were", not "was"
 Done -- Nascar1996(Talk • Contribs) 19:55, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
"Edwards retained the pole position lead" - slightly awkward, perhaps "retained the lead from the pole position"?
 Done -- Nascar1996(Talk • Contribs) 19:55, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
"collided into the wall" - appears several times but is also slightly awkward, would "...hit the wall in turn (#)" work?
Since it doesn't specify which turn it occurred in, I just substituted "collided" with other words in the other instances. -- Nascar1996(Talk • Contribs) 19:55, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
"reclaimed the lead away from Hamlin" - shoud be either "took the lead away from..." or "reclaimed the lead from..." I think.
 Done -- Nascar1996(Talk • Contribs) 19:55, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
"caused him to fall to nineteenth on the grid" - sounds like the starting grid is being referenced. "...nineteenth in the field"?
 Done Removed "on the grid." -- Nascar1996(Talk • Contribs) 19:55, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
In the results tables, "Stewart-Haas Racing" should have the dash.
 Done -- Nascar1996(Talk • Contribs) 19:55, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 
Article is fully and factually referenced, with citations throughout and free of WP:OR. I do have a quibble with the citation style used though, as it may be unclear to some viewers. I'd suggest using the following for certain sites, with the format work=/publisher=: Rotoworld.com = Rotoworld/NBC Sports; NASCAR.Com = NASCAR.com/Turner Sports; Jayski.com = Jayski's Silly Season Site/ESPN; racing-reference.info = Racing=Reference/USA Today Sports Media Group; MotorRacingNetwork.com = Motor Racing Network/International Speedway Corporation. Also, I'm not sure Auto Racing Daily is universally recognised as a reliable source, would it be possible to perhaps cite a newspaper report instead, like The Charlotte Observer's?
 Done... I had to change the quotes while I was at it... -- Nascar1996(Talk • Contribs) 20:20, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 
Article covers the event well and broadly without needless digression.
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 
Article is neutral.
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 

It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 
Images are appropriate, appropriately licensed, and captioned.
Overall:
Pass/Fail: 
Very close, just needs attention to the issues above; placed on hold until then. - The Bushranger One ping only 19:28, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Looks like I have fixed all of the problems you have expressed. -- Nascar1996(Talk • Contribs) 20:20, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
And pass, good work! - The Bushranger One ping only 21:33, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on 2010 Kobalt Tools 500 (Phoenix). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101111025735/http://www.nascar.com/races/tracks/ to http://www.nascar.com/races/tracks/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:02, 12 May 2017 (UTC)