# Talk:2010 Brazilian Grand Prix

Sébastien Buemi and Adrian Sutil were given five-place grid penalty each according to the notes below the qualification table. If so, why their grid position is only four places higher than actual position? 82.141.93.136 (talk) 16:53, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

Simple. Buemi's penalty was applied first, and as he moved down, Sutil moved up one spot. Sutil's penalty applied, Buemi moved up one spot and thus both only lost four spots on the grid as per here. Cs-wolves(talk) 17:01, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on 2010 Brazilian Grand Prix. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101122172127/http://fia.com/en-GB/mediacentre/pressreleases/wmsc/2009/Pages/wmsc_111209.aspx to http://www.fia.com/en-GB/mediacentre/pressreleases/wmsc/2009/Pages/wmsc_111209.aspx
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:44, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:2010 Brazilian Grand Prix/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Bcschneider53 (talk · contribs) 17:14, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
I'll take this one. Comments to follow soon. --Bcschneider53 (talk) 17:14, 2 May 2020 (UTC)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose):  b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): 
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): {{GAList/check|}y}

It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 

It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 

It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 

Overall:
Pass/Fail: 


### Lead
"Jenson Button, Hamilton's teammate, was mathematically eliminated from retaining the championship" Suggest making it more clear that Button was the defending champion


### Background
"with 231 points; ahead of Red Bull's Mark Webber" think a comma is more appropriate here, or perhaps even nothing at all


### Practice
No major issues that I can see.


### Qualifying
#### Post-qualifying
"Kovalainen 20th and Di Grassi 21st" small d in "di Grassi."


### Race
ALT text for images might be good if you have FAC aspirations, but not a requirement here by any means.
"Schumacher fell to tenth by driving onto the grass" was this a driver's error or was he forced onto the grass?
"the Grand Prix's sole safety car deployment:" I'd change this to a simple period but feel free to ignore this one if you like it as is.


#### Post-race
Just a note, I've boldly tweaked the captions to ensure the parentheses are non-italics, feel free to tweak further
Refs, images look good, no dab or external link issues.
Really just some minor prose stuff here. Should be simple fixes. --Bcschneider53 (talk) 16:21, 6 May 2020 (UTC)

@Bcschneider53: Have addressed all of the points raised above. MWright96 (talk) 17:20, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
@MWright96: Thank you! Pass. --Bcschneider53 (talk) 18:13, 6 May 2020 (UTC)