# Talk:2014 Singapore Grand Prix

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 6 external links on 2014 Singapore Grand Prix. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20140903194410/http://www.formula1.com:80/races/in_detail/singapore_929/circuit_diagram.html to http://www.formula1.com/races/in_detail/singapore_929/circuit_diagram.html
Added archive https://web.archive.org/20140727182829/http://www.fia.com:80/championship/fia-formula-1-world-championship/2014/calendar to http://www.fia.com/championship/fia-formula-1-world-championship/2014/calendar
Added archive https://web.archive.org/20140727051712/http://www.formula1.com:80/news/headlines/2014/7/16141.html to http://www.formula1.com/news/headlines/2014/7/16141.html
Added archive https://web.archive.org/20140920195310/http://www.formula1.com:80/results/season/2014/929/7394/ to http://www.formula1.com/results/season/2014/929/7394/
Added archive https://web.archive.org/20140921035347/http://www.formula1.com:80/results/season/2014/929/ to http://www.formula1.com/results/season/2014/929/
Added archive https://web.archive.org/20140922012839/http://www.bbc.com/sport/0/formula1/29296574 to http://www.bbc.com/sport/0/formula1/29296574
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 14:01, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:2014 Singapore Grand Prix/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Mike Christie (talk · contribs) 10:56, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
I'll review this. Mike Christie (talk - contribs -  library) 10:56, 21 February 2018 (UTC)

for the change to tyres: too easy to parse as "the change to tyres from something else"; it took me a second to reparse it.  How about "for the tyre change"?
 Done MWright96 (talk) 10:05, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Valtteri Bottas, Kevin Magnussen and Alonso had finished second at least once, and Jenson Button, Sergio Pérez and Felipe Massa had all finished third once: what's the significance of this?  You don't list the drivers who won one or more of the earlier races; why list those who place?
Come to think about this issue, there is little significant value to this and have removed it from the article. MWright96 (talk) 10:05, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
What is a "sector time"?
It is the time set by a particular driver in a certain part of the track. MWright96 (talk) 10:05, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
and at the next race of the season in Japan, they would be prohibited: suggest "and decided that [or announced that] at the next race of...".
Replaced with the former. MWright96 (talk) 10:05, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Rosberg was only able to shift gears two at any one point: "shift gears two" looks incomplete.
Clarified. MWright96 (talk) 10:05, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
to install soft compound tyres for a potential under cut: what is an "under cut"?  You also have "undercut" a sentence later; whatever it means it should presumably be consistently given the space or not.
Undercut is known as overtaking in the pit lane for strategy reasons as stated per [1]. . Have made the spelling consistent. MWright96 (talk) 10:05, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Because of the length of time spent behind the safety car, the race would end under a two-hour time limit: I don't understand this -- surely the safety car would slow things down, not speed the race up?
Clarified. MWright96 (talk) 10:05, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
-- Mike Christie (talk - contribs -  library) 01:14, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

@Mike Christie: I have replied to your queries in the clearest way possible. MWright96 (talk) 10:05, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Looks good; promoting. Mike Christie (talk - contribs -  library) 10:43, 22 February 2018 (UTC)