# Talk:1987 World Cup (snooker)

This review is transcluded from Talk:1987 World Cup (snooker)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: No Great Shaker (talk · contribs) 08:24, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
I'll be happy to review this. Hope to provide some feedback soon. No Great Shaker (talk) 08:24, 23 October 2020 (UTC)


### Basic GA criteria
GACR#1a. Well written: the prose is clear, concise and understandable. 
GACR#1a. Well written: the spelling and grammar are correct. 
GACR#1b. Complies with the MOS guidelines for lead sections. 
GACR#1b. Complies with the MOS guidelines for article structure and layout. 
GACR#1b. Complies with the MOS guidelines for words to watch. 
GACR#1b. Complies with the MOS guidelines for writing about fiction – not applicable.
GACR#1b. Complies with the MOS guidelines for list incorporation. 
GACR#2a. Contains a list of all references in accordance with the layout style guideline. 
GACR#2b. All statements are verifiable with inline citations provided. 
GACR#2b. All inline citations are from reliable sources. 
GACR#2b. All quotations are cited and their usage complies with MOS guidelines. 
GACR#2c. No original research. 
GACR#2d. No copyright violations or plagiarism. 
GACR#3. Broad in its coverage but within scope and in summary style. 
GACR#4. Neutral (NPOV). 
GACR#5. Stable. 
GACR#6a. Images are at least fair use and do not breach copyright. 
GACR#6b. Images are relevant to the topic with appropriate captions. 
I'll use the criteria listed above to measure progress. I've already checked the image which is fair use and the article is stable so that's a start. Back later. No Great Shaker (talk) 12:58, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
I just made one minor tweak. It's a short summary of the tournament but it adequately covers the scope without excessive detail and is very well written. I've no problem with the citations and the article is fine so I'm promoting it to GA. Well done. No Great Shaker (talk) 13:45, 24 October 2020 (UTC)