# Talk:Attack on USNS Card

This review is transcluded from Talk:Attack on the USNS Card/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Harrison49 (talk) 14:23, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality: 

B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists: 
The article follows a good style and layout throughout.
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources: 

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary: 

C. No original research: 
References are well used.
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects: 

B. Focused: 
The articles follows the major aspects and remains focused on the subject.
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias: 
The article maintains a neutral point of view.
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc: 
The article does not appear to be subject to any edit wars.
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales: 

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions: 
Images not in the public domain have full fair use rationales.
Overall:
Pass or Fail: 
A very interesting read. Harrison49 (talk) 16:30, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
Thank you for reviewing my work.Canpark (talk) 09:52, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

This article from the Naval Institute suggests that there were no American fatalities from the attack, contradicting the article. Might be worth looking into. Stikkyy  t/c 19:04, 20 November 2025 (UTC)