# Talk:1970 Idaho gubernatorial election

https://www.ourcampaigns.com/RaceDetail.html?RaceID=758828
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/106591297102400208
https://library.cqpress.com/cqalmanac/document.php?id=cqal70-1292460
https://www.idahopress.com/cavalcade/cecil-andrus-from-accidental-politician-to-idaho-legend/article_87ea4a44-5702-11e0-9bce-001cc4c03286.html
http://clerk.house.gov/member_info/electionInfo/1970election.pdf
-- MoreExtra, 15:51, 7 February 2019 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:1970 Idaho gubernatorial election/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Puddleglum2.0 (talk · contribs) 21:54, 7 November 2019 (UTC)


### Issues
@MoreExtra: Thank you for nominating this article for GA status! Below I will post some issues I find with the article; if you fix all of them, I will pass the nomination.

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, spelling, and grammar):  b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): 

It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):  d (copyvio and plagiarism): 

It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 

It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 

It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 

Overall:
Pass/Fail: 

Please put in more citations, especially in the beginning after you write who won the election. 
@MoreExtra: I added some citation needed templates to show you which places I thought needed templates the most.
Puddleglum2.0👌(talk)  22:04, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

@User:Puddleglum2.0  Thank you! I made the changes -- how's it look now? -MoreExtra (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 16:22, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
@MoreExtra: It looks good! I've passed it. Puddleglum2.0👌(talk)  15:31, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

@User:Puddleglum2.0  Thank you so much! I really appreciate your help. -MoreExtra (talk) 17:02, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
@MoreExtra: No problem. You did a really great job on this article, I'm glad it passed. :) Yours - Puddleglum2.0   Have a talk? 17:24, 15 November 2019 (UTC)