# Talk:1988 Women's Cricket World Cup final

This review is transcluded from Talk:1988 Women's Cricket World Cup Final/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: MWright96 (talk · contribs) 13:47, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
Will be reviewing this article as part of the GAN Backlog Drive of April to May 2020. MWright96 (talk) 13:47, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for the review, will take a look through in detail tomorrow. Harrias talk 20:42, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose):  b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): 
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 

It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 

It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 

It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 

Overall:
Pass/Fail: 


### Background
"England had won the first world cup" - World Cup
"Australia had beaten England" - defeated
Wikilink wickets to the relevant article


### Route to the final
"once against Australia and once against New Zealand." - possible minor rewrite to avoid repetition of the same phrase?
"Ireland and the Netherlands were well adrift," - behind


### Summary
"in Melbourne, Australia on 18 December." - comma after Australia please
"Heather Smith, of The Sydney Morning Herald suggested that," - the first comma isn't needed I think
Wikilink the first mention of the term "crease" to the relevant article and the same for the terms "delivery" and "over"
"earning praise from both The Sydney Morning Herald and The Times,[9][6]" - refs in numerical order
The MOS specifically states this is not necessary: "References need not be moved solely to maintain the chronological order of footnotes as they appear in the article..". Harrias talk 20:42, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
It's a part of the MOS that I don't agree with but it's no deal breaker MWright96 (talk) 08:17, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
"and in the fourteenth over," - 14th


### Aftermath
Both mentions of "world cup" should be spelt as "World Cup"
@MWright96: Other than the point I responded to last night, all have been changed as suggested. Thanks for the review. Harrias talk 08:53, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
@Harrias: Am satisfied with the changes and will be promoting to GA class. MWright96 (talk) 12:02, 2 May 2020 (UTC)