# Talk:Accounting research

This review is transcluded from Talk:Accounting research/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Cirt (talk · contribs) 17:23, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

I will review this article. — Cirt (talk) 17:23, 27 January 2014 (UTC)


### Image review
File:Pacioli.jpg = one image used, image hosted on Wikimedia Commons, image checks out alright. Y.
— Cirt (talk) 17:28, 27 January 2014 (UTC)


### Stability review
Inspected article edit history going back to article creation, no problems shown.
Looked at article talk page history, no problems there either.
— Cirt (talk) 21:39, 27 January 2014 (UTC)


### GA review table analysis
Should we subject this article to peer review?Lbertolotti (talk) 15:07, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Accounting research. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131227111624/http://www.accaglobal.com/content/dam/acca/global/PDF-technical/human-capital/rr-120-002.pdf to http://www.accaglobal.com/content/dam/acca/global/PDF-technical/human-capital/rr-120-002.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:26, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

This article is well written but it neglects significant research streams in accounting, particularly those that are more common outside of the United States. This includes critical, sociological, behavioural, and historical approaches to accounting research. There are numerous reputable academic journals for this research, such as Critical Perspectives on Accounting,  Accounting, Organizations and Society, Behavioural Research in Accounting, and Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal.
I will be making an effort over the coming months to update the article to reflect these other areas of research. If you have any suggestions to make, or comments on my edits, I would be delighted to talk here.
BoneClock (talk) 11:33, 5 October 2018 (UTC)
The list of topical areas in this article is particularly problematic. The article cited arrives at its categories by definition (see page 643) rather than by deriving them empirically. I'll be looking for a better reference. If anyone has a suggestion, please leave it here.
BoneClock (talk) 21:48, 5 November 2018 (UTC)