# Talk:2002 BDO World Darts Championship

This review is transcluded from Talk:2002 BDO World Darts Championship/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Lee Vilenski (talk · contribs) 22:11, 29 February 2020 (UTC)

Hello, I am planning on reviewing this article for GA Status, over the next couple of days. Thank you for nominating the article for GA status. I hope I will learn some new information, and that my feedback is helpful. 
If nominators or editors could refrain from updating the particular section that I am updating until it is complete, I would appreciate it to remove a edit conflict. Please address concerns in the section that has been completed above (If I've raised concerns up to references, feel free to comment on things like the lede.)
I generally provide an overview of things I read through the article on a first glance. Then do a thorough sweep of the article after the feedback is addressed. After this, I will present the pass/failure. I will use strikethrough tags when concerns are met. Even if something is obvious why my concern is met, please leave a message as courtesy. 
Best of luck! you can also use the {{done}} tag to state when something is addressed. Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 
Please let me know after the review is done, if you were happy with the review! Obviously this is regarding the article's quality, however, I want to be happy and civil to all, so let me know if I have done a good job, regardless of the article's outcome.


### Immediate Failures
It is a long way from meeting any one of the six good article criteria -
It contains copyright infringements -
It has, or needs, cleanup banners that are unquestionably still valid. These include{{cleanup}}, {{POV}}, {{unreferenced}} or large numbers of {{citation needed}}, {{clarify}}, or similar tags. (See also {{QF-tags}}). -
It is not stable due to edit warring on the page. -


### Links
### Prose
#### Lede
Should we note that Surrey is in England?
Can we have the official title (With Embassy) in the lede somewhere.
The infobox should have a year in the event title.
Tony David, who has the blood-clotting disorder haemophilia, - whilst I'm sure it's important that he has the disorder, is it really super relevent to him winning the event? If there is a note regarding his disorder being notable, I'm sure we can place that elsewhere in the lede.
England captain Martin Adams is a seaofblue. Try England captain Martin Adams
A women's world championship was held for the second time. - should be in the first paragraph. See notes later
Is a whitewash really suitible for a best-of-3?


#### General
The background section should arguably be it's own section. The article writes as if the event is only for men, and there happens to be a women's event. Even if that is how the media projects this, we shouldn't.
was seeded first and Martin Adams, the England captain, was seeded second - were they seeded second because they were the England captain?
The remaining five places... This bit is after the seedings. It should probably explain this is for the qualification places.
Do we need sources after each player name?
best-of-11 frames - I don't think you meant this.
"to qualify for the BDO championship." - I prefer "took their places".
Is it Round 1 or first round?
He began with a maximum (180) - do we need to say both?
Eighth seed Wayne Mardle went 2–0 ahead of Richardson in set three before the latter equalled at 2–2 .  - needs a source, and fix punct
Quarter-finals to the final - is a terrible name for a section. If we move the above bit to a background section, you don't need a subsection.
three-dart finishing averages - Isn't this a three-dart averages?


### GA Review
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, spelling, and grammar):  b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): 

It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):  d (copyvio and plagiarism): 

It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 

It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 

It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 

Overall:
Pass/Fail: 


### Comments
Automated note - If you fancy returning the favour, I have outstanding GA nominations that require reviewing at WP:GAN. I'd be very grateful if you were to complete one of these, however it's definately not manditory. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs)
Only a few comments here MWright96. I'll place on hold. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 17:01, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
@Lee Vilenski: Have made the changes suggested above. MWright96 (talk) 17:53, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
Passing to GA. Good job!  Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 18:53, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Martin Adams 2012.jpg
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 19:37, 23 June 2020 (UTC)