# Talk:Ajax 5–1 Liverpool (1966)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Ajax 5–1 Liverpool (1966)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: The Almightey Drill (talk · contribs) 20:47, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

We meet again, NapHit! You are certainly keeping up a good canon of LFC matches. I will copyedit the page and then ask you questions if need be, as I find that much more efficient than ordering a user to make petty corrections. '''tAD''' (talk) 20:47, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

OK, after a good read and copyedit, I just have one thing to query. Can you make there be uniformity in the name of the stadium: either the original "Olympisch Stadion" or the translated "Olympic Stadium" all the way through. I'm not familiar enough with the entity to know which is the most common name. Just see to that and you've got another pass '''tAD''' (talk) 21:06, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
Ok, this should be fixed now. Thanks for the review tAD, it's much appreciated and yes I am building up quite a canon of LFC matches. The goal is to get them all to GA standard eventually! NapHit (talk) 23:31, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Ajax 5–1 Liverpool (1966). Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.liverpoolfc.com/news/features/liverpool-v-ajax-1966-revisited
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 02:05, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Ajax 5–1 Liverpool (1966). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151227022329/http://www.rsssf.com:80/tablesn/ned66.html to http://www.rsssf.com/tablesn/ned66.html
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151119062511/http://www.rsssf.com:80/engpaul/fla/1965-66.html to http://www.rsssf.com/engpaul/FLA/1965-66.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:45, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Ajax 5–1 Liverpool (1966). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.rsssf.com/tablesn/ned66.html
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.rsssf.com/engpaul/FLA/1965-66.html
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140510160346/http://en.archive.uefa.com/competitions/ecwc/history/season%3D1965/intro.html to http://en.archive.uefa.com/competitions/ecwc/history/season%3D1965/intro.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:47, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

Struggling to see the significance of this particular match that would justify a separate article. Unusual factors of poor weather and high score do not obviously elevate it above other events with these features which generally do not meet the threshold of standalone notability. There are many sources, of course, but it's a fixture in a major competition between two big clubs so again, that could be said for every tie in the competition across its 70 year history. Crowsus (talk) 20:08, 5 August 2025 (UTC)