# Talk:Black dogfish

This review is transcluded from Talk:Black dogfish/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Sasata (talk) 16:18, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
Comments in a day or two. Sasata (talk) 16:18, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
Comments As usual, check my copyedits to make sure I didn't mess anything up. Otherwise, it looks good, not much to say: Sasata (talk) 15:53, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

"The black dogfish (Centroscyllium fabricii) is a species of dogfish shark in the family Etmopteridae, common over the outer continental shelf and continental slope at a depth of 180–2,250 m (590–7,380 ft)." Perhaps split this opening sentence, as the way its written, it's not completely clear whether the last half of the sentence applies to the species or the family.
Done.
I'm thinking "white muscle" should have a link, but couldn't find anything appropriate… according to our article on skeletal muscle, this term seems outdated, and type IIb is more accurate (?)
Changed to "swimming muscle"; "white muscle" is still used often in fish literature, but the distinction is not all that important here since this species doesn't have any red muscle.
any data on lifespan?
Not to my knowledge
convert tons to metric
Fishery statistics are always reported in metric tons, even in countries that otherwise use Imperial. I've linked the first instance to clarify.
probably don't need to define the acronyms TAC and ICES, as they aren't used again
I like including acronyms for terms when they exist; I think it's helpful in case the reader encounters them somewhere else.
Let me know of further issues. -- Yzx (talk) 17:54, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

No further issues. Images are PD or appropriately licensed, fixed one dab; passing as GA now. Sasata (talk) 18:08, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
Thanks! -- Yzx (talk) 18:21, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Black dogfish. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110612100812/http://www.ices.dk/reports/ACOM/2007/WGEF/WGEF07.pdf to http://www.ices.dk/reports/ACOM/2007/WGEF/WGEF07.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:45, 21 July 2017 (UTC)