# Talk:Athelm

This review is transcluded from Talk:Athelm/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Adam Cuerden (talk · contribs) 21:32, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
Similar to Wulfhelm, this is a very good article on someone who, while notable, has little information available about him. 

1. Well written?: Deals well with ambiguity, and covers the interesting aspects that make him notable clearly, despite difficulty.
2. Factually accurate?: Sources look quite good
3. Broad in coverage?: As said above, this article deals well with the conflict between notability and lack of information. It's short, but comprehensive.
4. Neutral point of view?: No issues
5. Article stability?: No issues
6. Images?: Not possible; as explained in the article, no coins exist with him, and I'm quite happy to believe that any other images are either obscure or unavailable. Adam Cuerden (talk) 21:32, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

There is a footnote referring to "Dolley "Important Group" British Museum Quarterly", but this item does not appear in the references. Ælfgar (talk) 11:51, 1 March 2014 (UTC)

Fixed. Just an oversight ... happens. Nice catch, thanks! Ealdgyth - Talk 13:08, 1 March 2014 (UTC)