# Talk:Battle of Elephant Point

This review is transcluded from Talk:Battle of Elephant Point/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Hi! I'll be doing the GA review for this article, and I should have the full review up shortly. Dana boomer (talk) 17:15, 3 October 2009 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose):  b (MoS): 
Is there are reason that the operation code names are bolded in the Background section?
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 

It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 

It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 

It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 

Overall:
Pass/Fail: 

The article looks great, so I'm going to pass it to GA status. I had one minor question regarding formatting, but it's not enough to hold up the GA nomination over. Congrats and keep up the good work! Dana boomer (talk) 17:56, 3 October 2009 (UTC)

Hey, thanks! I usually bold operation names so that they're seen more clearly. Skinny87 (talk) 18:06, 3 October 2009 (UTC)

Heya! I was digging thru some of my great grandmothers old things and came across a photo with my great grandfather. He was in the Indian 44th division and the text at the bottom of the photo says. 

“The capture of the Elephant Point defences at the mouth of the Rangoon river by units of the 2nd (then 44th) Indian airborne division: 6th May 1945 
The dates on the wiki all point to May 1st  could this be in error? 2A00:23C6:6F0D:8601:601D:660:23B3:45AB (talk) 22:00, 29 September 2022 (UTC)