# Talk:2022 Fenway Bowl

This review is transcluded from Talk:2022 Fenway Bowl/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Cherrell410 (talk · contribs) 20:03, 19 June 2023 (UTC)

 
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a. (prose, spelling, and grammar): 

see bottom
b. (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): 

All of the names in this article need to be wikilinked per MOS:UL
Do you mean the names of the individual players? If so, then I disagree; I don't think the linked MOS page supports that (they'd all be redlinks and, while that's not necessarily a bad thing, I'm not convinced they'd all be notable enough to be turned blue). If there's any football-specific terms that need linking, let me know and I can do that (that falls under the "jergon/technical terms" clause of UL). PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 21:36, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Any names that are bluelinks should be linked. Cherrell410 (talk) 02:27, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
Done, added three links. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 02:45, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
@Cherrell410: Sorry, forgot a ping. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 02:45, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
"deadlocked" should be wikilinked
Changed this to another word that more clearly describes what happened. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 21:36, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a. (reference section): 

b. (citations to reliable sources): 

c. (OR): 

d. (copyvio and plagiarism): 

8.7%!!!
It is broad in its coverage.
a. (major aspects): 

b. (focused): 

It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 

It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): 

No media, but media are not required for GA status
b. (appropriate use with suitable captions): 

per above
Overall:
Pass/fail: 

Suggestions for improvements:
Lead: The inaugural fenway bowl, the game featured... --> As the inaugural fenway bowl, the game featured...
Adjusted, but used different wording. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 21:36, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Background: unable to play their scheduled opponent, smu, was unable to find a replacement --> sentence should be split into 2
I disagree; the second part of that sentence explains that SMU wasn't able to replace UVA after they had to drop out. I think it sounds totally natural as is, with only one sentence. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 21:36, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
Teams#Cincinnati: set to join --> joined
I know this seems pedantic, but Cincinnati won't join the Big 12 until next Saturday, July 1, 2023, so changing it to past tense now would technically be incorrect. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 21:36, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
(Criteria marked  are unassessed)

@Cherrell410: responses above, thank you for the review. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 21:37, 21 June 2023 (UTC)