# Talk:2015 UEFA Champions League final

Suarez link wrong, Rafinha's link in 'Rafinha footballer born 1998' it should be just Rafinha
49.150.23.229 (talk) 17:48, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
 Done by another - this article is (inevitably) receiving lots of edits and IP users do not always see the current version - Arjayay (talk) 18:43, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

49.150.23.229 (talk) 17:55, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

 Not done: as you have not requested a change.If you want to suggest a change, please request this in the form "Please replace XXX with YYY" or "Please add ZZZ between PPP and QQQ".Please also cite reliable sources to back up your request, without which no information should be added to, or changed in, any article. - Arjayay (talk) 18:39, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

Change The jersey colors of Buffon and Ter Stegen in the photo
49.150.23.229 (talk) 21:04, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

 Not done: What photo? I don't see a photo of either of the two footballers. Please be more specific (where in the article is it? What should it be changed to?) about the changes you desire. Altamel (talk) 23:11, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
Altamel: When the comment was made, the line-up diagram included the said goalkeepers as shirts in a different colour to the ones they wore for the match. This has since been fixed. '''tAD''' (talk) 23:18, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

Wasn't Neymar booked by the referee after taking off his shirt just after scoring the goal (like last year when ronaldo was also booked after scoring the penalty in the final minute and taking off his shirt)? Arka 92 10:30, 7 June 2015 (UTC)

A quick glance at the UEFA.com match report would tell you that he wasn't. – PeeJay 10:38, 7 June 2015 (UTC)

The Actual Day of Final - Sat. (Saturday) should be put in. Wiki. articles are all about "improvement". Not being a "footie mad fan" and wanting to know the Actual Day of Final - Sat. (Saturday) - I had to go to a online calendar to find out 6 June 2016 was on a Sat. - But before that I browser searched (Find): Sat in the article, but no "Sat.". People come to Wiki. to find detailed Info. So Please add Saturday (Sat.) to the articles of the European Cup/Champions League Final, as the actual Day of play, Thank you. 86.147.24.172 (talk) 02:32, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

What difference does the day of the week make? – PeeJay 08:35, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:2015 UEFA Champions League Final/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Boca Jóvenes (talk · contribs) 15:32, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Excellent article as regards the actual match. I've only one reservation, this about the venue section. I'd like to see some citations in there. If you can please do that, I'll be happy to pass it as a good article. On hold for the present. Thanks. Boca Jóvenes (talk) 18:13, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

@Boca Jóvenes:  Done. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 19:37, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Boca Jóvenes, I would have expected at least one inline source citation for the first paragraphs under both Juventus and Barcelona. Any possibility those can be supplied before listing? BlueMoonset (talk) 21:46, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
@BlueMoonset:  Done. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 22:06, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
@Vaselineeeeeeee: thank you very much for your help. @BlueMoonset: you are right, I missed those but, again thanks to Vaselineeeeeeee, all seems okay now. Thank you, both. I'm going to pass this. Boca Jóvenes (talk) 10:05, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

No problem, glad to help get this to GA! Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 11:42, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

Well written:  

the prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct; and
it complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. Very well written and no problems.
Verifiable with no original research: 

it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline;
all in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines;
it contains no original research; and
it contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism. Sourcing is good. No problems with original or copying.
Broad in its coverage: 

it addresses the main aspects of the topic; and
it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). Presents a wide view of the event but within a summary style.
Neutral: 

it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. Yes.
Stable: 

it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. No problems.
Illustrated, if possible, by images: 

images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content; and
images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. Some useful images and there seem to be no fair use problems.
This completes the review and the article passes GA. Boca Jóvenes (talk) 11:31, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

After recent edits it is time to discuss the assist of Pedro in the lead.
My opinion is that it should not be included. The first source for that sentence (BBC Sport) does not mention Pedro in relation to that goal and also the lead is a summary of the article and to keep assist there is not notable, it should only be the most important fact. There is a separate section for the summary of the match where the assist could be included. There was also something about it being included in the Spanish wikipedia but that does not affect this article at all and should not matter. Qed237 (talk) 16:28, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

Agree, unnecessary edit. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 16:32, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:1993 UEFA Champions League Final which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RMCD bot 02:02, 22 December 2022 (UTC)