# Talk:A Golden Crown

According to the Atlantic's Scott Meslow, "Ned's principles are, as always, admirable, and he's clearly interested in justice. But the sad truth is that the lack of guile that makes him honorable also makes him a pretty poor king. It's a terrible idea to order the arrest of the man who is single-handedly financing your kingdom." [12]
If you can pull it off, it is of course an excellent idea -- all his holdings will be attainted and fall to the crown, including, conveniently, the IOUs signed by the crown. The real terribleness is the "if you can pull it off" -- in a union-of-kingdoms feudal situation with each great noble holding their own army (and no standing army) you pretty much can't.80.101.113.45 (talk) 21:24, 29 May 2011 (UTC)

The deletion of Westeros.org and the content it supports from this and other articles has been contested here. Darkfrog24 (talk) 02:27, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

There is an RfC at Oathkeeper regarding whether the site Westeros.org meets the criteria for an expert self-published source (and is therefore suitable for use on Wikipedia).  It is being cited as a source for the statement "This episode was based on [specific chapters of] [specific book]." This article is likely to be affected by the outcome.  Participation is welcome. Darkfrog24 (talk) 23:39, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

An RfC on Westeros.org was closed with the result that the value of the disputed text should be handled separately.  This RfC is meant to determine whether Game of Thrones episode articles should have a statement like "This episode was based on [specific chapters] of [specific book]" in the body text. (This article has one.[1]) The outcome of this RfC is likely to affect all Game of Thrones episode articles.  Participation is greatly appreciated. Darkfrog24 (talk) 21:16, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on A Golden Crown. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110721214627/http://grrm.livejournal.com/165235.html to http://grrm.livejournal.com/165235.html
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.avclub.com/articles/a-golden-crown-for-experts%2C56414/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:57, 18 June 2017 (UTC)