# Talk:1996 Oman cyclone

This review is transcluded from Talk:1996 Oman cyclone/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: 12george1 (talk · contribs) 02:00, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
Hello Hurricanehink! I will be reviewing this article tonight. Overall, I think it is pretty nice. After reading through the article, I believe I have only three issues with passing it.

"The World Bank assisted in a project to rebuilt the damaged infrastructure in Yemen" - "rebuilt" ---> "rebuild"
On reference #3, "line feed character in |title= at position 43"
Why no page number(s) for reference #4?
That should be it.--12george1 (talk) 02:00, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

Awesome, thanks @12george1:! I believe these issues should be addressed now. As for IMD and page number, I'm just proving the IMD did not designate the system as a depression or stronger in their annual report, so there wouldn't be a page number. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk)  16:43, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on 1996 Oman cyclone. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120412152908/http://www.imd.gov.in/section/nhac/dynamic/rsmcobmission.pdf to http://www.imd.gov.in/section/nhac/dynamic/rsmcobmission.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:34, 16 June 2017 (UTC)