# Talk:2002–03 South Pacific cyclone season

More info for all of the storms. Hurricanehink (talk) 13:36, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

Eseta report

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

http://www.abc.net.au/queensland/news/200306/s874354.htm
In 2002–03 South Pacific cyclone season on 2011-05-25 07:28:56, 404 Not Found
In 2002–03 South Pacific cyclone season on 2011-06-11 05:25:21, 404 Not Found
--JeffGBot (talk) 05:25, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

http://www.abc.net.au/queensland/news/200306/s874407.htm
In 2002–03 South Pacific cyclone season on 2011-05-25 07:28:56, 404 Not Found
In 2002–03 South Pacific cyclone season on 2011-06-11 05:25:31, 404 Not Found
--JeffGBot (talk) 05:25, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

Can someone double check the intensities off all the STC's this season ASAP, Nadi says 6 STC's developed this season while we say 7.Jason Rees (talk) 14:08, 18 October 2012 (UTC)

As far as I know, the Nadi season summary report reads as "Ten tropical cyclones occurred in the region, of which seven attained hurricane intensity, one storm and three gales." Maybe they discounted Erica because it formed outside the basin in that STC count, but nonetheless, it appears they say 10 to 7. TheAustinMan(Talk·Works) 17:45, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

I'm copyediting this article - can I assume that where I find "conductive", it should be "conducive"? --Demiurge1000 (talk) 04:13, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

I dont see why not, but favourable might be better imo.Jason Rees (talk) 19:03, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:2002–03 South Pacific cyclone season/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: 12george1 (talk · contribs) 06:28, 3 February 2013 (UTC)

State at the end of the lead how much damage and deaths the season as a whole caused.
"During January 2003, NIWA issued an updated outlook with the Northern Cook Islands and French Polynesia now predicted to experience a higher than average number of tropical cyclones, while Vanuatu was now predicted to experience a higher than average number of tropical cyclones." - Is there a way you could condense that to avoid redundancy and run-on? For example, "During January 2003, NIWA issued an updated outlook with the Northern Cook Islands, French Polynesia, and Vanuatu now predicted to experience a higher than average number of tropical cyclones."
"Tropical Depression 03F and Cyclone Zoe. Zoe was the" - Redundancy; avoid starting a sentence with the word used to end the previous sentence.
"In 2003, thirteen disturbances formed, of which eight developed into tropical cyclones; six intensified further and became severe tropical cyclones." - You should probably say, "In the first half of 2003...", since there were 3 other tropical cyclones that developed in the same basin later that year.
"Yolande had completed an transitioning into an extratropical cyclone" - Grammatical error; I think you meant: "Yolande had completed a transition into an extratropical cyclone".
"barometric pressure falling 40 mbar (1.2nbsp;inHg) to a minimum" - Missing an ampersand (&) there.
"After wind shear lessened, Cilla reached its peak intensity on January 28, attaining maximum winds of 75 km/h (45 mph) sustained over 10 minutes." Curious, why did you wait until now to actually mention a wind speed, after all, there were four other storm sections before this one.
"Tropical Storm Gina by June 5 about 600 mi (970 km) east-southeast of Honiara." "Category 3 tropical cyclone on the Australian intensity scale, with winds of 90 mph (140 km/h). The JTWC recorded winds of 105 mph (170 km/h)." - Why the sudden switch to American units of measure first. For example, it should be "970 km (600 mi)" to remain consistent with the rest of the article.
"36. ^ Gary Padgett (2003). "Monthly Global Tropical Cyclone Summary, June 2003"" - "Gary Padgett" --> "Padgett, Gary"
 Done - Fixed the aforementioned issues. Also added peak intensity winds to a few more storms. TheAustinMan(Talk·Works) 15:43, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
Good job TheAustinMan. I will now pass this article.--12george1 (talk) 13:27, 6 February 2013 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 7 external links on 2002–03 South Pacific cyclone season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.niwa.co.nz/sites/default/files/import/attachments/icu-2002-11.pdf
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.niwa.co.nz/sites/default/files/import/attachments/icu-2003-01.pdf
Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/6BN8eyxyx?url=http://reg.bom.gov.au/amm/docs/2005/courtney.pdf to http://reg.bom.gov.au/amm/docs/2005/courtney.pdf
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120920054955/http://meteo.nc/cyclone/cyclones-passes?view=cyclones to http://www.meteo.nc/cyclone/cyclones-passes?view=cyclones
Corrected formatting/usage for http://australiasevereweather.com/cyclones/2003/summ0302.htm
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.met.gov.fj/documents/TC_Seasonal_Summary_02-031190690457.pdf
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.islandvulnerability.org/phd/meheuxphd.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:04, 22 May 2017 (UTC)