# Talk:Adore You (Miley Cyrus song)

Adore you was in the top of the streamings songs  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Julyr222 (talk • contribs) 17:35, 26 January 2014 (UTC) 

Someone add Portuguese Chart please, it's not working for me.
Source: http://acharts.us/song/80809
FOTW-MC (talk) 09:43, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Adore You. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.allaccess.com/top40-mainstream/future-releases
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140221172147/http://cedricgervais.com/2014/02/miley-cyrus-vs-cedric-gervais-adore-you-remix-official-video/ to http://cedricgervais.com/2014/02/miley-cyrus-vs-cedric-gervais-adore-you-remix-official-video/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:59, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

I've again rolled back some changes that remove verifiable references about the chart positions of this song. This fix also repairs referencing errors introducesd by the reference definition removal, as the references are used more than once in the article's text.
If there are concerns about the veracity of these references, please raise them specifically here so we can work out a less disruptive fix. -- Mikeblas (talk) 22:57, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

I've again restored references that were removed without explanation. -- Mikeblas (talk) 18:32, 13 February 2021 (UTC)