# Talk:Acceptable level of violence

This review is transcluded from Talk:Acceptable level of violence/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: MX (talk · contribs) 18:45, 3 April 2020 (UTC)


### Review
Review coming up. MX (✉ • ✎) 18:45, 3 April 2020 (UTC)

A quick note that the "See also"—Containment—should be retargeted to Ulsterisation, the process by which the British government made NI institutions responsible for managing the conflict rather than running it directly. It's not a geopolitical strategic foreign policy pursued by the United States  :) Keep well, ——SN54129 19:33, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
I don't think it is the same. Ulsterisation says that the other two prongs of the category are "normalization" and "criminalization", this article is presumably what "normalization" refers to. buidhe 20:24, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Sorry for the late review. The article is short but thorough. It is ripe for promotion. Below are a few points needed to be addressed before we promote this to GA. MX (✉ • ✎) 19:34, 8 April 2020 (UTC)


### GA progress
#### Prose
A 2018 article in Irish Times suggested - Should be The Irish Times.
Done
are considered acceptable losses—although - Should it be were considered acceptable losses ...?
Done
 that the post-Troubles violence was - Please link The Troubles or an article about the post-war violence, if any.
Rephrased
Democratic Unionist Party MLA Jimmy Spratt called Orde's comments "outrageous" - What is MLA?
linked Member of the Legislative Assembly (Northern Ireland)
but 88 of them in the United Kingdom. - I'm not able to see the pages, but does it use United Kingdom? Above you had used Great Britain.
Yes, "Great Britain" refers to England, Scotland and Wales: the United Kingdom outside Northern Ireland. The second reference is to United Kingdom as a whole.


#### Image
Image is properly licensed. But I tried accessing the link but it is dead. How sure are we this was released by the U.S. federal government? I found this archived version but it is still Ebay.
Yeah, that is suspicious. I cannot confirm it either, or find a free image of Maudling, so I removed it.


#### Other points
No obvious copyright violations
Sources are reliable and I found no unsourced material
MOS layout is fine and article is stable
Thanks for the review! I think I have fixed everything. buidhe 20:17, 8 April 2020 (UTC)