# Talk:Amanda Award

GA review (see here for criteria)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose):  b (MoS): 

It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 

It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 

It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars etc.: 

It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 
Another image would be nice
Overall:
Pass/Fail: 

The writing is good, and it passes most of the criteria. However, there are a couple issues. First, is it possible to expand it? Second, another image would be needed. Because the issues are relatively minor, I have put this article on-hold until the issues have been addressed. Thank you for you hard work in improving the article thus far, and good luck in improving the article to GA status. Juliancolton The storm still blows... 02:51, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for your review. I have included the only image I could think of that was both relevant and free. As for expansion, I have written a bit more on the last section, regarding the awards. Apart from that, I know it's short, but I think I've covered all major aspects with the information available. If there is anything in particular you believe is missing, please let me know. Lampman Talk to me! 13:51, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose):  b (MoS): 

It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 

It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 

It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars etc.: 

It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 

Overall:
Pass/Fail: 

It has improved greatly since my first review, and thus it now passes GA.

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Amanda Award. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20040324063055/http://www.nfi.no:80/nyenorske/_nyheter/vis.html?id=670 to http://www.nfi.no/nyenorske/_nyheter/vis.html?id=670
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 04:43, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Amanda Award. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070214032258/http://www.haugesund.kommune.no:80/cgi-bin/haugesund/imaker?id=20984 to http://www.haugesund.kommune.no/cgi-bin/haugesund/imaker?id=20984
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 20:25, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Amanda Award. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080920231356/http://www.filmweb.no/filmfestivalen2007/multimedia/archive/00115/Amandavinnere_1985__115375a.pdf to http://www.filmweb.no/filmfestivalen2007/multimedia/archive/00115/Amandavinnere_1985__115375a.pdf
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080920231356/http://www.filmweb.no/filmfestivalen2007/multimedia/archive/00115/Amandavinnere_1985__115375a.pdf to http://www.filmweb.no/filmfestivalen2007/multimedia/archive/00115/Amandavinnere_1985__115375a.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:07, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Amanda Award. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080106201519/http://www.filmweb.no/filmfestivalen2007/english/amanda/article130702.ece?language=english to http://www.filmweb.no/filmfestivalen2007/english/amanda/article130702.ece?language=english
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090803215355/http://www.aftenposten.no/kul_und/film/article1065830.ece to http://www.aftenposten.no/kul_und/film/article1065830.ece
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060115082843/http://www.nrk.no/underholdning/4997807.html to http://www.nrk.no/underholdning/4997807.html
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080106201519/http://www.filmweb.no/filmfestivalen2007/english/amanda/article130702.ece?language=english to http://www.filmweb.no/filmfestivalen2007/english/amanda/article130702.ece?language=english
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:46, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Amanda Award. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080307090503/http://www.filmweb.no/filmfestivalen2007/english/about/article130184.ece?language=english to http://www.filmweb.no/filmfestivalen2007/english/about/article130184.ece?language=english
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070929160200/http://www.haugesund.net/hfoto/fototurer/statuer/1.htm to http://www.haugesund.net/hfoto/fototurer/statuer/1.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:20, 3 July 2017 (UTC)