# Talk:Battle of Green Spring

I think rather than erasing the entire article because it came from another article, it should be rewritten with the article listed as a source. Thoughts? --Awiseman 20:45, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

To the extent the copy is of Federal Government origin, it's Public Domain, but a rewrite with more sourcing would be an improvement.  More of a skirmish than a battle though. Pohick2 (talk) 01:54, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Battle of Green Spring/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: —Ed!(talk) 18:36, 17 September 2010 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria) (see here for this contributor's history of GA reviews)
It is reasonably well written:
On Hold
"In an action that many considered confirmation of the epithet "Mad"..." Who? This statement should be referenced.
Well, to a first approximation, it is referenced -- by the cite at the end of the sentence.  I believe this is more-or-less what the Wickwires claimed.  I think they meant contemporary opinion, but did not go into detail; I'll have to check. I know that Nelson has some interesting contemporary quotes (as opposed to quotes by historians or biographers) that specifically use words like "mad" and "madness", so I can probably rewrite that bit. Magic♪piano 22:04, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
I've rearranged this, and added some more relevant commentary. Magic♪piano 19:27, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
In the battle section, you talk a lot about what Wayne and Lafayette were during the battle. Where was Cornwallis? Did he observe the battle from a remote location or was he with his troops?
Sources generally don't say where Cornwallis was, except to note that he led the countercharge. Magic♪piano 19:27, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
Are there any ideas on what time the battle began? It's hard to tell until the very end of the battle section any idea of what time things happened.
Added more time indicators. Magic♪piano 19:27, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
You should expand the lead a little to include information from the Aftermath and Legacy sections. This will make the lead summarize the whole article.
Done. Magic♪piano 19:27, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
It is factually accurate and verifiable:
Pass
It is broad in its coverage:
Pass
It follows the neutral point of view policy:
Pass
It is stable:
Pass
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate:
Pass
Overall:
Oh Hold while a few minor things are fixed. —Ed!(talk) 18:36, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for taking the time to review; I think I've addressed your concerns. Magic♪piano 19:27, 18 September 2010 (UTC)

 This article has been reverted by a bot to this version as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) This has been done to remove User:Accotink2's contributions as they have a history of extensive copyright violation and so it is assumed that all of their major contributions are copyright violations. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. VWBot (talk) 06:14, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 6 external links on Battle of Green Spring. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100417022117/http://www.historicgreenspring.org:80/plantation_history.php to http://www.historicgreenspring.org/plantation_history.php
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110716141202/http://www.historicgreenspring.org/plantation_location.php to http://www.historicgreenspring.org/plantation_location.php
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051222172240/http://www.cr.nps.gov:80/history/online_books/hh/14/hh14a1.htm to http://www.cr.nps.gov/history/online_books/hh/14/hh14a1.htm
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050116201155/http://www.rootsweb.com:80/~valancas/docs/WhiteRevPen.html to http://www.rootsweb.com/~valancas/docs/WhiteRevPen.html
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080517021607/http://www.connecticutsar.org/articles/diary.htm to http://www.connecticutsar.org/articles/diary.htm
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110716141131/http://www.historicgreenspring.org/voices/samuel_clark_hero.pdf to http://www.historicgreenspring.org/voices/samuel_clark_hero.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:43, 28 October 2016 (UTC)