# Talk:Augustus Smith (politician)

I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:

This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 01:27, 22 June 2013 (UTC)

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Augustus Smith (politician)/CommentsTalk:Augustus Smith (politician)/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
Last edited at 18:12, 24 May 2014 (UTC).
Substituted at 08:37, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Augustus Smith (politician)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Mike Christie (talk · contribs) 11:15, 3 September 2022 (UTC)

I'll review this. Mike Christie (talk - contribs -  library) 11:15, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
Images are appropriately tagged; sources are reliable.

I think the lead could be a little longer; it's only one sentence at the moment.
'As the title suggests, it traces the family name from its early beginnings and purports ″the county of Nottingham may justly be considered as the fatherland of Smiths, who have always abounded within its borders″': "asserts" might be a more natural word than "purports".
That's all I can find to complain about.  The article is well written. Mike Christie (talk - contribs -  library) 11:38, 3 September 2022 (UTC)

Wonderful, thanks for being willing to review the article! I've addressed the problems you raised, please let me know if there's anything else to sort out for the review. Have a great day! HenryTemplo (talk) 12:06, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
Fixes look good; passing. Mike Christie (talk - contribs -  library) 12:20, 3 September 2022 (UTC)