# Talk:2013 Cotton Bowl Classic

This review is transcluded from Talk:2013 Cotton Bowl Classic/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Toa Nidhiki05 (talk · contribs) 17:34, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
I'll review this article. Toa Nidhiki05 17:34, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose):  b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): 
Mostly fine. Any errors are minor and probably preferential.
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 
There are a couple sections that need citations. The second paragraphs of both the Texas A&M and Oklahoma sections need citations since they are statistics or facts. The first two on each of those are fine.  Done --Go Phightins! 01:43, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 
Article covers all required information and stays on topic
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 
No issues here.
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 
No edit wars of note. Article is stable and unlikely to change.
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 
Quick passing as there are no images.
Overall: I will pass this once the citation issues are fixed. Passed! Good job, and keep up the good work. :)
Pass/Fail: