# Talk:AIX Connect

This article has some or more phrases copied directly from the mentioned sources. Please see [1] and [2]. It may contain more such phrases from other sources. — Abhishek  Talk 17:05, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

I fixed two sentences that I felt may be close paraphrased. I didn't find any other, so I removed the tag. --Anirudh Emani (talk) 13:35, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
I have restored the tag. The article still has issues. Please do not remove without a proper explanation. — Abhishek  Talk 06:42, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
Do mention some because I seriously don't think there are. I will try to help as much as I can. --Anirudh Emani (talk) 11:25, 14 April 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for addressing those issues. I've done a spot-check of the article in evaluating its automatic listing at the copyright problems board, and I did not find any issues myself, so I have removed the tag. If there are ongoing issues, please help identify them by pointing out problematic areas when you retag. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 10:32, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:AirAsia India/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Sainsf (talk · contribs) 17:55, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Hi! Happy to review. Sainsf <^>Feel at home 17:55, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

Hi! Let me know the comments! Magentic Manifestations (talk) 18:33, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Nice article. Here are my comments:

Lead:
joint venture with AirAsia Berhad holding 49% of the airline, Tata Sons holding 40.06% and Telestra Tradeplace having the remaining 10% in the airline Better rephrase this as "joint venture with AirAsia Berhad holding 49% stake in the airline, Tata Sons holding 40.06% and Telestra Tradeplace holding the remaining 10%." Please check that the meaning is the same.Y
What exactly is Telestra Tradeplace?Y
Air Asia India commenced operations on 12 June 2014 with Bangalore as its primary hub. Would look better in first para.Y
 The company marked Tata's return to aviation industry after 60 years, having ceded Air India in 1946. Would look better in second para.Y
Sainsf, done!Magentic Manifestations (talk) 17:02, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
Thanks, Magentic Manifestations. Now, continuing with the rest of the article:

History:
foreign direct investment of up to 49% "in airlines"?Y
 with Tata sons  "S"onsY
₹1.25 (1.9¢ US)/available seat kilometer "/" would look better as "per". "Kilometre" as per BE.Y
The introduction of AirAsia was expected to By whom?Y
an amount of US$50 million Could be converted to INR. (stated originally in US$, so did not convert)
rent/lease aircraft  The slash could be better replaced by "or".Y
AirAsia India was established on 28 March 2013. AirAsia is the first foreign airline to set up a subsidiary in India. Can be combined.Y
as its secondary hub Remove "as".Y
 after IndiGo and SpiceJet with  "SpiceJet, with"Y
Corporate affairs:
founder of AirAsia group announced "group, announced"Y
airline, however the latter refused "airline; however, Tata refused"Y
Somewhere you say "chairman", elsewhere "Chairman".Y
 chief adviser  "advisor" (BE)Y
Destinations:
If each entry has a source then what is ref. 29 for?(think, no harm in additional reference from airline website.)
Fleet:
Link Airbus.
import 10 A320-200 aircraft Would be better to say "ten" here.Y
AirAsia India on 21 March 2015 "On 21 March 2015, AirAsia India"Y
and the is registered as VT-APJ Error?Y
Honor --> Honour (BE).Y
Sources:
In ref. 18, the publisher is Anna.aero.Y
I think that should be it. These addressed, I would be happy to promote this. Cheers! Sainsf <^>Feel at home 04:26, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Sainsf, done!Magentic Manifestations (talk) 07:35, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Very well, promoted. Cheers! Sainsf <^>Feel at home 07:36, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
The statement "As of February 2016, AirAsia India is the third largest low cost carrier in India, after IndiGo and SpiceJet with a market share of 2.2%." is inaccurate. The third largest low-cost carrier in India is GoAir.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Btarunr (talk • contribs) 15:04, 26 June 2016 (UTC) 

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on AirAsia India. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/industry-and-economy/government-and-policy/fipb-to-take-up-airasia-india-entry-proposal-on-march-6/article4442588.ece?homepage=true&ref=wl_home
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150722030707/http://www.airasia.com/in/en/promotion/rr1300508.page?icid=iae731hpmba to http://www.airasia.com/in/en/promotion/rr1300508.page?icid=iae731hpmba
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:06, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

For most of its existence it was Air Asia (India), AIX Connect appears to be a "placeholder" never intended to be a separate brand but some sort of transitioning AI owned entity. AIX Connect was never painted on aircraft (the aircraft were simply stripped of Air Asia branding and repainted in Air India Express colours)[3], the brand never sold its own tickets and isn't really WP:RECOGNIZABLE. Would like get a few opinions on this. Pinging @LeoFrank:,@Sunnya343:,@Jetstreamer:. Bingobro (Chat) 09:34, 30 December 2023 (UTC)

Agree. Once the complete merger is effective, this page should be moved back to Air Asia India and its history as an Air Asia subsidiary preserved. We shouldn't merge the page with Air India Express. — LeoFrank  Talk 14:31, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
I also agree with changing the title per WP:RECOGNIZABLE. Sunnya343 (talk) 17:24, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
I also agree. Also, fleet numbers should reflect historic fleet rather than be zero. Arnav Bhate (talk) 10:54, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
i concur, now we should change it back to 'AirAsia India' Cryptoons (talk) 03:37, 7 February 2025 (UTC)
You can start a move request with proper policy based arguments. Arnav Bhate (talk • contribs) 05:42, 13 February 2025 (UTC)