# Talk:1952 World Snooker Championship

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on 1952 World Snooker Championship. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120222034318/http://www.global-snooker.com/professional-tournaments-archive-world-championship-roll-of-honour.asp to http://www.global-snooker.com/professional-tournaments-archive-world-championship-roll-of-honour.asp
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:54, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:1952 World Snooker Championship/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: MWright96 (talk · contribs) 18:25, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Shall review for the July 2021 GAN Backlog Drive MWright96 (talk) 18:25, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose):  b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): 
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 

It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 

It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 

It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 

Overall:
Pass/Fail: 


### Lead
"The 1952 World Snooker Championship was a snooker tournament held between Monday 25 February and Saturday 8 March 1952" - the days aren't really needed here
Changed. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 19:15, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
"at Houldsworth Hall in Manchester, England" - comma missing after the word "Hall"
Changed. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 19:15, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
"In winning the event, Lindrum became the first player from outside the British Isles to win the tournament," - repetition of "win"
Changed. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 19:15, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
"with some only counting Robertson's win due to the field of just two players." - what is meant by "some" in this context?
Sorry, Historians. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 19:15, 9 July 2021 (UTC)


### Background
"Due to a dispute between the Professional Billiards Players' Association (PBPA) and the organisers for the event, the Billiards Association and Control Council (BACC), most players withdrew from the event." - repetition of "event"
Covered Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 19:36, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Wikilink the term frame to the relevant article only on the first mention not on any other subsequent mentions
Covered Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 19:36, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
The term round-robin will also be wikilinked to the correct article
"McConachy had performed badly, losing all eight matches"' - McConachy was defeated in each of the eight games he played
Covered Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 19:36, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
The Wikilink of the BACC in the third paragraph is unneeded but the word table can be to Billiard table


### Summary
"Lindrum won eight of the next twelve to lead 14–10 after the second day's play." - a word is missing from this sentence
"Day five featured Lindrum extend his lead to 38–22 after day five," - The fifth day saw
"needing just two of the remaining 37 for victory." - a word is missing from this excerpt
"Lindrum won the first two frames to reach a winning 73–37 position on the 6 March."-  on 6 March. per MOS:DATES
"The remaining 35 "dead" frames were due to be played," - dead frames
"Lindrum became the first player from outside the British Isles to win the World Championship, and would remain the only one until compatriot Neil Robertson won the event in 2010.[22]" - the fact of Robertson's 2010 victory will need an additional reliable source to verify it along with the one already at the end of this sentence
All covered. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 19:56, 9 July 2021 (UTC)


### References
References 1, 7 and 11 are missing their page numbers
Done Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 14:56, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
References 2 and 23 are duplicates of each other
Done Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 14:56, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
References 7, 20, 22, 26 and 27 should mention that they are from Trove using the via= field
Done Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 14:56, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
References 4, 6 and 12 to 19 and 21 should mention they were from Google Newspapers using the via= field
Done Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 14:56, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
The work in Reference 20 should be cleaned up to say The Mercury not "Mercury (Hobart, Tas. : 1860 – 1954)"
Done this one. Will pick up the remainder when at a PC. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 19:59, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Am putting the review on hold to allow the nominator to address or query each of the points raised above MWright96 (talk) 19:04, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

I think that's everything covered now MWright96. Thanks for the review once again Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 14:56, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
@Lee Vilenski: Have made various changes to two incomplete refs; now promoting this article to GA status MWright96 (talk) 15:45, 10 July 2021 (UTC)