# Talk:Anton Dohrn Seamount

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Anton Dohrn Seamount. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070411090511/http://www.geo.vu.nl:80/users/wijj/literature%20Wijbrans/O'Connor%20et%20al.%20Nature%20'00.pdf to http://www.geo.vu.nl/users/wijj/literature%20Wijbrans/O'Connor%20et%20al.%20Nature%20'00.pdf
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090206163100/http://ngo.grida.no:80/wwfneap/Projects/Reports/Seamount_Report.pdf to http://www.ngo.grida.no/wwfneap/Projects/Reports/Seamount_Report.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:05, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Anton Dohrn Seamount/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Hog Farm (talk · contribs) 01:41, 16 April 2020 (UTC)


### Criteria
1. Prose  Pass
2. Verifiability  Pass
3. Depth of Coverage  Pass
4. Neutral  Pass
5. Stable  Pass
6. Illustrations  Pass
7. Miscellaneous  Pass


### Comments
1. 

"moat in the sediment that surround the seamount." - Surrounds, not surround
Done. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 10:06, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
"Show map of Oceans around British Isles" - Should oceans be capitalized?
Maybe, but I admit that I don't know where to make an edit to change that. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 10:06, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
It's unchangeable it looks like, it appears it results from infobox/map template defaults that can't really be changed.
"an over 2,000 metres (6,600 ft) submarine depression of unclear origin" 2,000 metres what? Long or deep?
Deep; fixed that. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 10:06, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
"45 kilometres (28 mi)[10]-40 kilometres (25 mi) wide" - Should be an endash, I believe
Fixed. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 10:06, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
"which define a transitional to alkaline suite." - Is there an article for this meaning of suite that this can be linked to?
Not as far as I know. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 10:06, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
Suite (geology) is a redirect to Petrology, is that the intended meaning?
Yes. Linked that and updated suite to reflect the existence of that link. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 15:22, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
Iceland plume is a duplink
Eocene is a duplink
Done both. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 10:06, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
"Finally, the bivalve Xylophaga anselli was found" - "was" implies it is no longer found there.  If that is not true, "has been" would be better
Aye, changed this. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 10:06, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
Parasitic cones and parasitic vents are essentially duplinks, as they redirect to the same place, only the first instance should be kept.
Resolved this. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 10:06, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
Same with cold water coral reefs and cold water coral
Changed. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 10:06, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
Bamboo corals is a duplink
Changed, as the below. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 10:06, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
Same with soft corals and sponges
2.

The refs with page ranges should have en dashes, instead of the short dashes
I think that's an issue with the CS1/2 templates. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 10:06, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
It looks like you're using sfn templates for a lot of the refs, and I've had this come up in reviews of articles I submitted to GAN.  There may be a script that can change this, but what I did with the articles I worked on was either manually insert the endash character or use the {{endash}} template to insert one.
3. 
4.
5.
6.
7.
Placing on hold, this one's in pretty good shape. Hog Farm (talk) 04:29, 16 April 2020 (UTC)

I got the rest of the dashes, the endash can also be inserted through the special characters tab at the top of the edit window. Passing now. Hog Farm (talk) 16:01, 16 April 2020 (UTC)