# Talk:Bath Assembly Rooms

This review is transcluded from Talk:Bath Assembly Rooms/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Seabuckthorn (talk · contribs) 16:02, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
Nominator: — Rod talk
Hi! My review for this article will be here shortly.  --Seabuckthorn ♥ 16:02, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

1: Well-written

a. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors: 
b. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:  

2: Verifiable with no original research

a. Has an appropriate reference section:  Yes
b. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:  excellent (Thorough check on Google. Cross-checked with other FAs)

c. No original research:   Done

3: Broad in its coverage

4: Neutral

5: Stable: No edit wars, etc:  Yes
6: Images  Done (Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 2.0 Generic license) (Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License) (PD)

Rod, I'm very happy and inspired to see your work here. I do have some insights based on the above checklist that I think will improve the article: 

I think the lead can be improved in order to provide an accessible overview for the History.
The image "Pickwick Papers, la salle de jeux à Bath29.jpeg" has "{{PD-Art}} template without parameter: please specify why the underlying work is public domain in both the source country and the United States". Is it a concern?
Besides that, I think the article looks excellent. Please feel free to strike out any recommendation from this review which you think will not help in improving the article which is our main aim here. All the best,  --Seabuckthorn ♥ 05:18, 15 February 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for your review and comments. I have revised the history paragraph of the lead, combined some short paragraphs and expanded the PD-art tag on the picture. Do you think they have helped?— Rod talk 10:30, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
Thanks! The article looks perfect now.  --Seabuckthorn ♥ 11:31, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
Promoting the article to GA status.  --Seabuckthorn ♥ 11:31, 15 February 2014 (UTC)

Hello editors, I'm working on a pilot project for the National Trust, which is looking at adding a discrete number of images to Wikimedia Commons, as well as introducing some volunteers to the principles of editing (more here). Some of the volunteers are based at Bath Assembly Rooms. Although they have a wide range of other interests, you might see a few edits from new editors appear here and I'd be grateful for your patience and support while they learn the ropes. Lajmmoore (talk) 10:18, 23 January 2024 (UTC)