# Talk:4: The Remix

Is the previous chronology a perfume and not 4. Aaron • You Da One 17:23, 26 April 2012 (UTC)

Because Heat is a EP while 4 is not. Jivesh1205 (Talk)
How can a perfume be an EP? Aaron • You Da One 22:05, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
Lol. Click on it. You will know how. Lol. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 09:11, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
Now it makes sense. It linked to the perfume before. Aaron • You Da One 09:35, 27 April 2012 (UTC)

"Recorded: 2009-11"?!! Isn't 2011-12 actually more correct? 109.10.33.64 (talk) 07:32, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:4: The Remix/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Tomica (talk · contribs) 21:18, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation links and dead references
End of Time redirects to The End of Time and Switch (DJ) to DJ Switch (however for the last I guess he is the same). — Tomica (talk) 17:15, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
No dead links. That's good. — Tomica (talk) 17:15, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
Infobox
Are you sure that all the songs were recorded in the period 2011-12? The 4 article says recording took place from 2009-2011? — Tomica (talk) 17:15, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
Why don't you add the producers in the infobox, instead of saying various? — Tomica (talk) 17:15, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
Lead
Prior to the release of the album ---> Is a extended play really an album? — Tomica (talk) 17:15, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
Rest is fine.— Tomica (talk) 17:15, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
Background and development
The contest, which was opened to entrants in 25 countries ---> Maybe you can name some of the countries? — Tomica (talk) 17:15, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
Also with naming some countries, you can split the big sentence in 2 sentences? — Tomica (talk) 17:15, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
Maybe you can tell from which country was the winner? — Tomica (talk) 17:15, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
Release and production
"The beat is great and I feel this mix would definitely get people moving in a club. It's got just enough attitude to get Beyonce fans moving." ---> I really think you can paraprase this ;) ! — Tomica (talk) 17:15, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
the EP appeared ---> The EP debuted. — Tomica (talk) 17:15, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
Track listing
Why don't you use this format? In that way you can also show which is the original producer. — Tomica (talk) 21:26, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
Credits and personnel
No issues — Tomica (talk) 21:26, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
Charts
No issues — Tomica (talk) 21:26, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
Release history
No issues. 21:26, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
References
Link Billboard only first time. — Tomica (talk) 21:26, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
35. The publisher should also contain UK Singles Chart — Tomica (talk) 21:26, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
All in all, a very good written article. You can start resolving the issues now. — Tomica (talk) 21:26, 27 May 2012 (UTC)

Everything  Done. My love is love (talk) 09:42, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
All in all
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose):  b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): 

It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 

It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 

It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 

It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 

Overall:
Pass/Fail: