# Talk:89th Military Police Brigade (United States)

This review is transcluded from Talk:89th Military Police Brigade (United States)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review. 
First read through suggests that a good copyedit and check for neutrality is needed

Please check spelling, lots of  mistakes. Please check capitalisation: brigade, corps, military police etc. seem to be caps or lowercase almost at random. Eg consecutive sentences The brigade is subordinate to... and The Brigade contains...
Is "headquarters" a verb – several occurrences of headquartered?
Yes, to be "headquartered at" is the same as being "located at" a place. -Ed!(talk)(Hall of Fame) 02:21, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
Regular Army is a disamb page Done
activated as a group what's a group - no link or gloss, and I don't know in this context?
However, as the brigade was a supporting unit, it never saw combat. However, it Done
However, it did receive every single campaign streamer that was awarded for Vietnam sercive. (sic) didn’t any other units get any? Done
Post Cold War Hyphen? Done
support of US Army missions everywhere really? Done
Joint Task Force is a disamb page Done
Rhode Island National Guard is a disamb page Done
"Operation Iraqi Freedom" quotation marks? In some articles it's written between quotes, but inconsistent, so probably OK as is.
Where does this occur? -Ed!(talk)(Hall of Fame) 02:28, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
Iraqi Theater caps suggest there's a play showing Done
multiple casualties, two (or four if you count non-combat) is stretching the meaning of multiple - bit pov Done
Williiam Steele was acquitted of aiding the enemy, but sentenced to 2 years confinement on other charges. pov/careless Done
I'll have another read and check the refs tomorrow, but there's a fair bit for you do for now. jimfbleak (talk) 16:26, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

Second read
item 1 above still needs doing - if you use Firefox, it's worth downloading an in-line dictionary to help pick up typos.
item 4 still to be done Done
earning every campaign streamer. - fixed in text, but not intro Done
 Brigade....was in charge of over 5,000 military police soldiers reads oddly to me, comprised maybe Done
ref 1 doesn't say it's published by Fort Hood staff, but does have an apparent author "Site maintained by SGT Stephenson" Done
ref 4 is an  Excel worksheet, should indicate that in ref since not html
ref 7 - why is this a reliable source  "Gilflink.mil" give no indication of publisher? Done
My mistake- I linked to the list which is actually part of gulflink.mil, part of the US Military Force Health Protection and Readiness program. Link to the website's main page here.
Gilmore ref has no title and is missing final  ] Done
ref 11 for William Steele is out-of -date, we know the results of the trial now Done
Is it possible to give a ref each for the "honors" and "streamers" sections? Done
That's everything now, jimfbleak (talk) 06:12, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
I've fixed the excel link, so you just need to copyedit, and we're about done. jimfbleak (talk) 06:01, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
Although I'm not the main article editor, I was ghosting around WP and saw that you needed a spell checker here.  I've got a spell check on my Mozilla browser, so I took a quick run through the article.  Hope this helped! Dana boomer (talk) 19:22, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
I did a copy-edit myself. How does it look now? -Ed!(talk)(Hall of Fame) 19:55, 18 July 2008 (UTC)


### Final stages
I did a final copy edit - mostly dropping incorrect capitalisation, two typos, changed "theatre" back to "theater" (unless you prefer the British spelling?) and changed the link for that word to point to the warfare use rather than the playhouse! OK, let's do it. 

GA review (see here for criteria)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose):  b (MoS): 
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 
It is stable.
No edit wars etc.: 
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 
Overall:
Pass/Fail: 

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on 89th Military Police Brigade (United States). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090307030334/http://pao.hood.army.mil/89thMPBde/index.htm to http://pao.hood.army.mil/89thmpbde/index.htm
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080518225912/http://www.defendamerica.mil/articles/jun2007/a060507tj1.html to http://www.defendamerica.mil/articles/jun2007/a060507tj1.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:45, 12 May 2017 (UTC)