# Talk:2023 World Athletics Championships – Women's 400 metres hurdles

... that Femke Bol "dominated" the world championhips final of the 400 metres hurdles (medalists pictured) winning her first global title in 2023?

Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Sidney Gish, Template:Did you know nominations/Jairo Penaranda
Comment: Image could be slightly cropped.

Editør (talk) 08:36, 27 October 2025 (UTC).

 New enough, long enough, adequately sourced, two QPQs done, image is properly licensed. Hook checks out and has an inline citation. I would suggest tweaking the hook to ... that Femke Bol "dominated" the 2023 world championhips final of the 400 metres hurdles (medalists pictured), winning her first global title? --Usernameunique (talk) 01:09, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
Thank you for your review. I think your tweak is an improvement, because it is clearer that it is her first global title of her career overall and not just in the year 2023. – Editør (talk) 17:23, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
My pleasure, Editør. To clarify things for whomever promotes the hook, I'm striking ALT0, and defining the tweaked hook as ALT1, which is approved.
ALT1: ... that Femke Bol "dominated" the 2023 world championhips final of the 400 metres hurdles (medalists pictured), winning her first global title? --Usernameunique (talk) 17:47, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

Hello, I am doing a QPQ review as part of an exercise. Here are the checks I performed:
The length: "OK" since the article is much more than 1500 characters of prose.
The sources: "OK" sources such as world athletics, official PDF documents of the results all this is reliable and correctly cited.
Neutral tone: "OK" The article is written in a neutral and encyclopaedic way.
Since she says I quote:
-« Femke Bol of the Netherlands started to move ahead of the other athletes from around 200 metres into the race, and she was several metres ahead of the rest of the field at the finish line. » And what would not have been neutral:
"Femke Bol realised an absolutely incredible and magnificent performance" so she did not add an adjective in order to give her opinion all this remains factual facts.
In addition, the article is well done since these are not only positive points about one person.
Hook: "OK" The fact "winning time 51.70 s and second-fastest time of her career" is well present and sourced in the article. It's interesting.
In my opinion, this article is "good to go" for the main page. 2560Elona (talk) 15:46, 12 November 2025 (UTC)

@2560Elona I think you are reviewing the DYK nomination for this article here. If you are indeed, you should post it on the nomination page so it is clear for everyone and will be also shown on Template talk:Did you know. Thanks! – Editør (talk) 19:01, 12 November 2025 (UTC)