# Talk:10 euro note

This review is transcluded from Talk:10 euro note/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Vibhijain (talk · contribs) 15:57, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
Will review it in some days.


### Comments
I am leaving some dupicate detector comments:

DONE.
DONE.
Cannot be changed.
Cannot be changed.
DONE.
Cannot be changed.
Cannot be changed.
Viewing this, I am putting a palm to my face. (FACEPALM).
Cannot be changed.
"
I'll finish the improving later on.– Plarem (User talk contribs) 19:41, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
(Translated text from es:Billete de diez euros)

Follow-up
There are several communities of people at European level (most of which is EuroBillTracker ) that, as a hobby, it keeps track of the euro banknotes that pass through their hands, to keep track and know where they travel or have traveled. The aim is to record as many notes as possible in order to know details about its spread (from where and to where they travel in general), follow it up (where a ticket has been seen in particular) and generate statistics and rankings (for example, in which countries there are more tickets). EuroBillTracker currently are registered more than 75 million tickets, worth more than 1600 million euros.

No references.
Am I supposed to use this? – Plarem (User talk contribs) 18:52, 21 October 2011 (UTC)

Now, I have never seen such a good GA Reviewer. Your English grammar isn't perfect, but your reviewing skills are great! – Plarem (User talk contribs) 19:03, 21 October 2011 (UTC)

If the the content is not reliable, do not add it, btw thanks for your comments, I know my English grammar isn't perfect, but I am trying to fix that. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email 11:01, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
Since references are there now, you can keep it. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email 12:47, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
Maybe there is some misunderstanding, i meant to change the "Security Features:" section, not the "Paper Type:".  Done ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email 10:11, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

This discussion is transcluded from Talk:10 euro note/GA2. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose):  b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): 
"The changeover period during which the former currencies' notes and coins were exchanged for those of the euro lasted about two months, until 28 February 2002." should include the start date which was 1 January 2002  Done
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 
Reference #9 is a dead link. Has been dead since 2012-07-01.  Done
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 

It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 

It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 

Overall:
Pass/Fail: 


### Comment
 Done – Plarem (User talk) 12:30, 23 August 2012 (UTC)

The information about the designer of the second series is probably incorrect. I am still trying to verify that the second note in the Europa series was also designed by Reinhold Gerstetter instead of Robert Kalina, but I have not yet been able to find a source for this information. Please help update this information. George horvath83 (talk) 08:53, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on 10 euro note. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110607234444/http://www.unmikonline.org/regulations/admdirect/1999/089%20Final%20%20ADE%201999-02.htm to http://www.unmikonline.org/regulations/admdirect/1999/089%20Final%20%20ADE%201999-02.htm
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130911232930/http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/focuson/focuson9120_en.htm to http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/focuson/focuson9120_en.htm
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070926234241/http://www.dnb.nl/dnb/home?lang=en&id=tcm%3A47-150696-64 to http://www.dnb.nl/dnb/home?lang=en&id=tcm%3A47-150696-64
Corrected formatting/usage for http://en.eurobilltracker.com/about/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:20, 5 June 2017 (UTC)