# Talk:Adam (Buffy the Vampire Slayer)

Image:Buffy-adam.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 04:42, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Just a note to say I'm going to be rewriting this article with full sources. You can find the process in my sandbox here. --Moni3 (talk) 22:16, 25 November 2011 (UTC)

Creative and casting section:

What ideas does the source say science and magic narrative devices express in the series? The original sentence said they are used as narrative devices to express "different ideas." Not sure what that meant.
What does "code-named" mean? Does it mean that Adam is a code-name (as in the first man)? In Fighting the Forces, that point is made--is that what this is meant to say?
Isn't "luck and being in the right place at the right time" redundant?
Is Casting Director usually wikilinked?
Does Hertzberg say how he resolved the concern about facial expression nuances?
That's all I have the energy for tonight. I understand we won't be able to get to these issues till after the holiday. Just trying to get caught up a bit. See you later, Moni.--TEHodson 09:19, 24 December 2011 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Adam (Buffy the Vampire Slayer)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: TBrandley (talk · contribs) 03:21, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
Issues:

Lede: Link fictional character
Footnotes: Change to References; on the citations, add Specific, then as Notes or References below it.
Great work. I only found two issues! On hold, though. TBrandley 03:21, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for the review. I guess I can't take all the credit; this article had just been over-hauled. I just updated it, add a reception section, and made it pretty. Thanks again!--Gen. Quon (Talk) 04:22, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Adam (Buffy the Vampire Slayer). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120626053600/http://blog.zap2it.com/pop2it/2012/04/joss-whedon-the-complete-companion-read-an-excerpt-now.html to http://blog.zap2it.com/pop2it/2012/04/joss-whedon-the-complete-companion-read-an-excerpt-now.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:43, 14 December 2017 (UTC)