# Talk:2006 FA Community Shield

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

http://www.thefa.com/TheFACup/TheFACommunityShield/NewsAndFeatures/Postings/2006/08/LiverpoolChelseaTeams.htm
In 2006 FA Community Shield on 2011-05-26 02:00:52, 404 Not Found
In 2006 FA Community Shield on 2011-06-13 17:21:33, 404 Not Found
--JeffGBot (talk) 17:21, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

http://www.thefa.com/TheFACup/TheFACommunityShield/NewsAndFeatures/Postings/2006/06/CommunityShield2006.htm
In 2006 FA Community Shield on 2011-05-26 02:00:52, 404 Not Found
In 2006 FA Community Shield on 2011-06-13 17:21:42, 404 Not Found
--JeffGBot (talk) 17:22, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:2006 FA Community Shield/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: The Almightey Drill (talk · contribs) 20:11, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
I'll take a look over this (Chelsea fan) '''tAD''' (talk) 20:11, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

I had a copyedit, soon I will check and verify each source. '''tAD''' (talk) 20:21, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
Passes criteria 1 by being well-written. I made some short sentences merge and removed some journalistic language "made to rue their chances".
Criteria 2 I will investigate in time
Criteria 3 Broad coverage without straying
Criteria 4 No visible bias at all
Criteria 5 Very stable
Criteria 6 All images are free, barring the programme, which has a suitable tag and is in an acceptable resolution to respect the copyright owner's rights '''tAD''' (talk) 20:31, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
Ref1 - Was Sissoko the official man of the match? We may need a reference from the FA for that. I'm reading this as him being the journalist's pick for the match.
I don't know, I can't find an official source from the FA for the match, so the guardian one is the only one to go by. NapHit (talk) 21:54, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

The match report from LFC calls him MotM as well, so it's pretty likely '''tAD''' (talk) 22:00, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
Refs 3 & 4 - AGF on newspaper sources
No problem NapHit (talk) 21:54, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
ref 5 = dead
Should be ok now NapHit (talk) 21:54, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
Just one thing, you don't have to do this - I definitely remember in 05/06 Chelsea did the double over Liverpool to win the title, and Liverpool beat them in the cup semi. Might be going off-topic, but it could be noted.
Added NapHit (talk) 21:54, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
A lot of match articles have diagrams of the line-ups. Not essential for the criteria, but a good addition nonetheless
If I had the software and the know how to do this I would, unfortunately I don't. NapHit (talk) 21:54, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
You only need to ask me, and I'll do it. – PeeJay 08:49, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
Oh thanks @PeeJay2K3:, that would be great if you could. NapHit (talk) 10:48, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
Archived match report is dead
Replaced NapHit (talk) 21:54, 3 August 2015 (UTC)