# Talk:1984 Intercontinental Cup

This review is transcluded from Talk:1984 Intercontinental Cup/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: West Virginian (talk · contribs) 16:43, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
NapHit, I will engage in a thorough and comprehensive review of this article within the next 48 hours. Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns in the meantime. Thanks! -- West Virginian  (talk) 16:43, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
NapHit, I've completed a thorough and comprehensive review and re-review of your article, and I find that it meets the criteria outlined for passage to Good Article status. Prior to its passage, however, I have shared below some comments and questions that should first be addressed. It has been a privilege to review this article and I look forward to your feedback. Thanks! -- West Virginian  (talk) 17:02, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar):  b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): 

It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 

It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 

It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 

It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 

Overall:
Pass/Fail: 

Lede

Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Lead section, the lede of this article adequately defines the cup match, establishes the cup match's necessary context, and explains why the cup match is otherwise notable.
The info box for the cup match is beautifully formatted and its content is sourced within the prose of the text and by the references cited therein.
The image used in the info box is properly licensed as Non-free media information with use rationale.
Liverpool F.C. should be named as such in the first paragraph, and Club Atlético Independiente should also be rendered as such in their first mention in the lede. A.S. Roma should also be written as such in its first mention.
The lede is otherwise well-written, consists of content that is adequately sourced and verifiable, and I have no further comments or questions for this section.
Match

The image of the National Stadium in Tokyo is licensed CC BY-SA 4.0-3.0-2.5-2.0-1.0 and is therefore suitable for use here.
Ensure that Independiente is spelled consistently throughout, as it is misspelled in the first paragraph of the Summary subsection.
In the Details subsection, I suggest placing an inline citation toward the top so that all the information within can be directly linked to a verifiable reference.
The lists of players is beautifully formatted otherwise.
This section is otherwise well-written, consists of content that is adequately sourced and verifiable, and I have no further comments or questions for this section.
Post-match

This section is well-written, consists of content that is adequately sourced and verifiable, and I have no comments or questions for this section.
Thank you very much for the review and the kinds West Virginian, its much appreciated. I think I've tidied up the article per your suggestions. Thanks again for the review. NapHit (talk) 17:17, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

NapHit, thank you for your timely incorporation of my suggestions. Upon my re-review, everything looks in order, so it is hereby a privilege for me to pass this article to Good Article status. Congratulations on another job well done! -- West Virginian  (talk) 17:20, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on 1984 Intercontinental Cup. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.fifa.com/classicfootball/clubs/matchreport/newsid=512088.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 10:03, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on 1984 Intercontinental Cup. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150719213314/http://www.rsssf.com:80/tablesa/arg84.html to http://www.rsssf.com/tablesa/arg84.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:46, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on 1984 Intercontinental Cup. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090603013027/http://rsssf.com/tablest/toyotamvp.html to http://www.rsssf.com/tablest/toyotamvp.html
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.fifa.com/classicfootball/clubs/matchreport/newsid%3D512088.html
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.fifa.com/classicfootball/clubs/matchreport/newsid%3D512088.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:40, 15 June 2017 (UTC)