# Talk:A Shot in the Dark (Homicide: Life on the Street)

This review is transcluded from Talk:A Shot in the Dark (Homicide: Life on the Street)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Xtzou (Talk) 19:52, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

This article has no Reception section, which I think is a major flaw. Xtzou (Talk) 19:52, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
I agree. The problem is I haven't been able to find any sources related to the Nielsen ratings or critical reviews for this particular episode. Since the article is still strong in the production aspects, I thought it could still meet GA standards as long as I wasn't actively neglecting any sources that talked about Reception. However, I will probably have access to some better news databases starting tomorrow and will take a closer look to see if I can dig anything up that I might have missed. — Hunter Kahn 19:58, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
Humm. Really? There is nothing? That seems strange, considering the other episodes seem to be well documented. It is a huge omission, but ... if there is nothing nowhere ... Xtzou (Talk) 21:19, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
Okay, I will take your word for it, since you apparently have the DVD etc. Otherwise, it is a fine article.  Xtzou (Talk) 22:56, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality: 

B. MoS compliance: }

Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources: 

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary: 

C. No original research: 

Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects: 

B. Focused: }

Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias: 

Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc: 

Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales: 

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions: 

Overall:
Pass or Fail: 

Congratulations! Xtzou (Talk) 22:56, 18 April 2010 (UTC)