# Talk:AAA When Worlds Collide

This review is transcluded from Talk:AAA When Worlds Collide/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 14:36, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

Hi, I will be reviewing this against the GA criteria as part of a GAN sweep. I'll leave some comments soon. JAGUAR  14:36, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguations: No links found.
Linkrot: No linkrot found in this article.


### Checking against GA criteria
GA review (see here for criteria)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose):  b (MoS): 
Good quality prose, follows MoS
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 
References check out, sources appear reliable
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 

It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 
NPOV
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 
Correctly licensed and tagged.
Overall:
Pass/Fail: 

Well there is nothing wrong with this, so passing again as GA status as it meets the criteria. JAGUAR  14:55, 27 November 2016 (UTC)