# Talk:Beat of My Drum

http://www.metro.co.uk/music/881205-nicola-roberts-accuses-madonna-of-copying-her-in-give-me-all-your-love
http://www.mirror.co.uk/celebs/news/2011/11/10/madonna-s-new-song-sounds-suspiciously-like-nicola-s-115875-23550582/
http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/theticket/2011/1111/1224307356230.html
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ukpress/article/ALeqM5hI-fovx0xZiyeSsLfRo5v39K6Btg?docId=N0574771320928293413A
http://www.nme.com/news/nicola-roberts/60321
http://nymag.com/daily/entertainment/2011/11/nicola-roberts-has-no-idea-whether-madonna-copied-her-on-that-new-song.html

This review is transcluded from Talk:Beat of My Drum/GA3. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Calvin999 (talk · contribs) 17:57, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose):  b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): 

It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 

It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 

It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 

It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 

Overall:
Pass/Fail: 


### Info box
Provide a caption for the alt parameter, explaining what is it on the artwork.
Use {{Start date|2011|06|03}} for the release date. Done
Use {{Duration|m=2|s=56}} for the length of the song. Done
Songwriters actual names should be used for the Songwriter parameter Done


### Lead
### Background and development
### Release and reception
The song has received positive reviews from critics. → "Beat of My Drum" garnered positive reviews from music critics.  Done
Robert Copsey, writing for Digital Spy, gave the song → Robert Copsey for Digital Spy gave the song  Done
A writer from website → Remove "website"  Done
Lots of quotes, paraphrase some please.
Dean Piper of → Dean Piper for  Done
Michael Cragg, writing for The Guardian, → Michael Cragg for The Guardian  Done
in the United Kingdom → Remove  Done


### Accolades
It's only a short section so I copy-edited it.


### Music video
I'm just going to c/e this one as well.
Need an alt description for the picture.
Need a source for Morgan as the director.
Make sure you include sources at the end of sentences.


### Live performances
Roberts performed the song on 2011's T4 on the Beach, and this was her first live solo performance. → Roberts performed "Beat of My Drum" for the first time at the 2011 T4 on the Beach in the United Kingdom.
Asked whether she was nervous about the performance, she said she had → After her performance, the singer was asked how she felt it went, saying
I did a slight c/e of this section.


### Formats and track-listings
### Charts
Change section title to "Chart performance"  Done
Make a subsection entitled "Charts"  Done
Put a comma after "United Kingdom"  Done
the song → "Beat of My Drum"  Done
on the issue date of 18 June 2011.  Done
Put a comma after "week"  Done
Put a comma after "64"  Done
and continued falling in its third week placing at number 88. → and fell to number 88 in its third week. 
falling is the present tense, fell is the past. This happened in the past. Plus, it makes more sense to read. Aaron • You Da One
Put a comma after "However"  Done
on 16 July 2011, the fourth week it rose to number 76 and again in its fifth week where it charted at number 50. → the song rose to number 76 in its fourth week, and again to number 50 in its fifth.  Done
the single → the song  Done
on the chart, → on that countries singles chart,  Done
date for Ireland?  Done


### Release history
### References
First, the dates and accessdates should be written in a British English format, i.e 2 July 2011. Apply this to each and every reference.
FN1: Should be |work=[[The Sun (United Kingdom)|The Sun]]|publisher=[[News International]]
FN2: Should be |work=[[The Guardian]]|publisher=Guardian News and Media
FN3: Should be |work=''[[Digital Spy]]''|publisher=[[Hachette Filipacchi Médias]]
FN4: Should be |work=''[[MTV News]]''|publisher=[[Viacom]]
FN6: Should be |work=''Digital Spy''|publisher=Hachette Filipacchi Médias (No linking as this is the second occurrence of Digital Spy in the references)
FN7: Should be |work=''MTV News''|publisher=Viacom (No linking as this is the second occurrence of MTV in the references)
FN8: Should be |work=''Digital Spy''|publisher=Hachette Filipacchi Médias (No linking as this is the third occurrence of Digital Spy in the references)
FN9: Should be |work=[[Billboard (magazine)|Billboard]]|publisher=[[Prometheus Global Media]]
FN10: Should be |work=''[[Popjustice]]''|publisher=Peter Robinson
FN11: Should be |work=[[Daily Mirror]]|publisher=[[Trinity Mirror]]
FN12: Should be |work=The Guardian|publisher=Guardian News and Media (No linking as this is the second occurrence of The Guardian in the references)
FN13: Should be |work=[[Metro (British newspaper)|Metro]]|publisher=[[Associated Newspapers]]
FN14: Should be |work=Metro|publisher=Associated Newspapers (No linking as this is the second occurrence of Metro in the references)
FN15: Should be |work=Daily Mirror|publisher=Trinity Mirror (No linking as this is the second occurrence of Daily Mirror in the references)
FN16: Should be |work=''MTV News''|publisher=Viacom (No linking as this is the third occurrence of MTV in the references)
FN17: Should be |work=Billboard|publisher=Prometheus Global Media (No linking as this is the second occurrence of Billboard in the references)
FN18: Should be |work=The Guardian|publisher=Guardian News and Media (No linking as this is the third occurrence of The Guardian in the references)
FN20: Should be |work=''MTV News''|publisher=Viacom (No linking as this is the fourth occurrence of MTV in the references)
FN21: Should be |work=''MTV News''|publisher=Viacom (No linking as this is the fifth occurrence of MTV in the references)
FN22: Should be |work=[[Daily Mail]]|publisher=[[Daily Mail and General Trust]]
FN23: Should be |work=''Digital Spy''|publisher=Hachette Filipacchi Médias (No linking as this is the third occurrence of Digital Spy in the references)
FN24: Should be |work=[[BBC News]]|publisher=[[BBC]]
FN25: Should be |work=''[[iTunes Store]] (United Kingdom)''|publisher=[[Apple Inc.|Apple]]
FN32: Should be |work=''iTunes Store (Ireland)''|publisher=Apple (No linking as this is the second occurrence of iTunes in the references)

The references are pretty bad to be honest. It warrants a fail. But I will place on hold for 7 days. Aaron • You Da One 12:36, 5 March 2012 (UTC)

Sorry but I am failing the article. 7 days have passed without an improvement. The references are quite poor and is a grounds for a fail in itself. If you amend this concerns when it best suits you are re-nominate, it should pass with next to no concerns. Aaron • You Da One 12:39, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

No music critic has openly criticised Madonna for copying Nicola's song. Articles on newspapers such as the Daily Mirror(not at all reliable source) appeared only after fans(not respectable critics!) of Nicola compared the two songs on Twitter. Please correct the section according to what the references state too that fans(not music critics!) compared the two songs and criticised Madonna!   --Szaboci (talk) 17:08, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

First of all Daily Mirror is a reliable source, and secondly here in the UK it was the cause of quite some controversy. We have reliable sources on the subject, and thirdly music critics did compare the two. -FeuDeJoie (talk) 18:42, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
I did not deny the controversy! There is controversy but that's because of the fans! What I'm saying is that the Daily Mirror article is short, there is nothing in it about what and how the two songs compare. It simply states that the Madonna song is a copy of Nicola's, but there is no mention of any acclaimed critics stating the above. The Metro article(the other reference cited) mentions only fans and Cheryl!!! Please read it if you don't believe me! I am just saying(and now I repeat myself) that it's a bit rich to say that music critics claimed that Madonna copied Nicola whereas it is far from the truth.--Szaboci (talk) 19:08, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Yahoo! source added comparing both tracks. Take a look. - Saulo Talk to Me 18:27, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
Fantastic, but the writer of the Yahoo article still didn't quite state what's written in the wiki article. He only responds to the Metro article released beforehand which in my view was clearly only to boost non-exsistent sales for "Beat of My Drum" which ended up as one of the biggest flops from all post Girls Aloud tracks. --Szaboci (talk) 15:06, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Beat of My Drum/GA4. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: 11JORN (talk · contribs) 00:59, 4 August 2012 (UTC)


### Infobox
No issues.


### Lead
It was released on 2 June 2011, via Polydor Records → It was released on 2 June 2011, by Polydor Records
as the first single from Roberts's debut solo album → So lead single?
Put (2011) after Cinderella's Eyes
"In the United Kingdom, it charted at number 27 on the UK Singles Chart" → You could cite only the country or only the chart.


### Background and development
"She stated that she had always wanted "Beat of My Drum" to be something different from the music that her rivals were presenting in the charts" → I don't think 'rivals' can be an appropriate adjective. Maybe 'other pop singers' can be better.


### Composition
No issues.


### Release
No issues.


### Critical reception
Is the Madonna paragraph realllllly necessary?
Unlink The Guardian, it is already listed in the background section. Also, unlink Billboard in the accolades subsection


### Music video
I made one small c/e.


### Live performances
No issues.


### Formats and track-listings
No issues.


### Chart performance
No issues.


### Release history
No issues.


### References
No issues.


### Summary
On hold for 7 days. Very good job. I think we can pass it this time. 11Jorn talk 13:16, 4 August 2012 (UTC)

I know you're very busy and you did not answer the review. So, I've fixed these issues by myself and passed the article. 11Jorn talk 22:37, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Beat of My Drum. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added {{dead link}} tag to http://music.yahoo.com/blogs/amplifier/madonna-love-already-accused-copy-catting-210034682.html
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110814011814/http://www.nicolarobertsmusic.com:80/blog/2011/05/hello-everyone to http://www.nicolarobertsmusic.com/blog/2011/05/hello-everyone/
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110717155353/http://nicolarobertsmusic.com:80/news/2011/07/catch-up-on-nicola's-recent-tv-appearances/ to http://nicolarobertsmusic.com/news/2011/07/catch-up-on-nicola's-recent-tv-appearances/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:08, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Beat of My Drum. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.nicolarobertsmusic.com/blog/2011/05/hello-everyone/
Corrected formatting/usage for http://nicolarobertsmusic.com/news/2011/07/catch-up-on-nicola%27s-recent-tv-appearances/
Added archive https://archive.is/20120721180447/http://www.chartstats.com/release.php?release=50318 to http://www.chartstats.com/release.php?release=50318
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:48, 16 July 2017 (UTC)