# Talk:Abrahams Creek

Why is this considered notable?  See WP:Notability  It's a tiny creek in rural PA, and the article covers everything about it in massive detail. 98.249.198.22 (talk) 23:59, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

Why not? See WP:NGEO. --Jakob (talk)  aka Jakec 00:00, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Abrahams Creek/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Sainsf (talk · contribs) 10:49, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Hi! Will get to this in a few days. Sainsf <^>Feel at home 10:49, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

Any linking possible in the names of the major soils and rock formations?
Done.
What is "Mohican"?
Linked for a second time.
You may link the terms linked in the lead again in the main text.
Done.
At present, Abrahams Creek has no officially named tributaries As of when exactly?
As of now.
Even then we should say "as of 2016". Sainsf <^>Feel at home 13:30, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
But that makes it sound like it is subject to frequent change, which it really isn't. --Jakob (talk)  aka Jakec 15:43, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
A note on what "impaired" means here? it is not considered by the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection to be impaired
Should be apparent to anyone who knows what the word "impaired" means. It's not a rare word.
I mean a note on "impaired water body". I recall discussing it in one of our earlier reviews. Sainsf <^>Feel at home 13:30, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
I know, we did talk about it, but I've had second thoughts since then. As I said, anyone who knows what impaired means should get the gist. --Jakob (talk)  aka Jakec 15:43, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
Use convert templates for "cubic feet per second" and "milligrams per liter"?
Done.
Can "sediment" be linked in the lead as well?
Done.
"Mouth" is linked way too late.
It's linked in the infobox.
Then let us remove this late link. Sainsf <^>Feel at home 13:30, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
I thought you said it was fine to  have repeat the link once in the body? --Jakob (talk)  aka Jakec 15:43, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
Sure but please link it at first mention in the main text, under Course. Sainsf <^>Feel at home 16:36, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
@Sainsf: Done. --Jakob (talk)  aka Jakec 11:45, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
Are "pond" and "flooding" not too common to be linked?
It's an edge case really, but removed.
Abrahams Creek Watershed Assessment and Project Prioritization Is this a report or a book? State this clearly.
It's the reference, and I don't particularly think it needs to be stated.
Thanks for your cooperation. I believe the article meets the GA criteria now. Pleased to promote this. Great job! Sainsf <^>Feel at home 07:21, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Abrahams Creek. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150402115211/http://www.dep.state.pa.us/dep/deputate/watermgt/wqp/wqstandards/TMDL/Solomons_FINAL%20-%2003-26-2007.pdf to http://www.dep.state.pa.us/dep/deputate/watermgt/wqp/wqstandards/TMDL/Solomons_FINAL%20-%2003-26-2007.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:24, 2 October 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Abrahams Creek. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/66gupqQDM?url=http://viewer.nationalmap.gov/viewer/ to http://viewer.nationalmap.gov/viewer/
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150402160134/http://r3levees.org/wiki/images/2/23/42079CV001A.pdf to http://www.r3levees.org/wiki/images/2/23/42079CV001A.pdf
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20170501122021/http://files.dep.state.pa.us/Water/Watershed%20Management/WatershedPortalFiles/NonpointSourceManagement/ProgramInitiatives/ImplementationPlans/Frances%20Slocum%20Report.final%20rev%203.pdf to http://files.dep.state.pa.us/Water/Watershed%20Management/WatershedPortalFiles/NonpointSourceManagement/ProgramInitiatives/ImplementationPlans/Frances%20Slocum%20Report.final%20rev%203.pdf
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160304001142/http://luzernecd.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/2009-Annual-Report.pdf to http://luzernecd.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/2009-Annual-Report.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:40, 25 June 2017 (UTC)