# Talk:2015 Clásica de San Sebastián

This review is transcluded from Talk:2015 Clásica de San Sebastián/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Zwerg Nase (talk · contribs) 09:03, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

On it! Zwerg Nase (talk) 09:03, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose):  b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): 

It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 

It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 

It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 

It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 

Overall:
Pass/Fail: 

The following things need to be adressed:

Teams: The statement that all World Tour teams are obligated to attend needs a source.
Favourites: The two examples of Valverde's earlier wins need sources as well.
All in all, this is a short, but comprehensive report on the race with very minor flaws. Once these are adressed, it will get a pass. Zwerg Nase (talk) 12:25, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

Zwerg Nase thanks for your review. Will sort this when I'm back from holiday. But does reference 7 not cover Valverde? Thanks. Relentlessly (talk) 12:36, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
@Relentlessly: You're right, it's there, I had only read the parts in the source on Rodriguez, since the footnote is behind the statements on him. You could add two more sources on the two seperate races to make it very good though ;) Zwerg Nase (talk) 12:40, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
Zwerg Nase done now, I think? Relentlessly (talk) 07:39, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
I think so too. Congrats! :) Zwerg Nase (talk) 10:03, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on 2015 Clásica de San Sebastián. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150702030045/http://www.uci.ch/mm/Document/News/Rulesandregulation/16/82/39/2-ROA-20150619-E_English.pdf to http://www.uci.ch/mm/Document/News/Rulesandregulation/16/82/39/2-ROA-20150619-E_English.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:53, 21 June 2017 (UTC)