# Talk:2012 Tour de France, Prologue to Stage 10

Why aren't we using the official ASO profiles?
--Troyeseffigy (talk) 06:50, 1 July 2012 (UTC)

Probably because they are copyrighted.  --  Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 06:58, 1 July 2012 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:2012 Tour de France, Prologue to Stage 10/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Zwerg Nase (talk · contribs) 13:52, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

I'll review this one. Zwerg Nase (talk) 13:52, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose):  b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): 

It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 

It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 

It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 

It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 

Overall:
Pass/Fail: 

The following needs to be taken care of:

Prologue: The first paragraph needs sources, both for the course and the statement of the expected times.
Stage 6: were as one again, not long later sounds really weird, maybe you can find a better wording?
The references to the Team Sky website are dead, please find a replacement or archived links here.
That's about it. Good job so far! Zwerg Nase (talk) 22:06, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

All taken care of, hopefully. Craig(talk) 22:57, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Looks good, it's a pass! :) Zwerg Nase (talk) 07:48, 25 October 2015 (UTC)