# Talk:A Human Work

What's the name of the company that made Jet Alone? "Japan Heavy Chemical Industrial Cooperative"?--Vi Veri Veniversum Vivus Vici 03:04, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
This sentence is incorrect: "However, Misato realizes she entered the code too late and it should have exploded: it shut off on its own." Misato's code was rejected as incorrect, even though she tried several times. Her last recourse was to try to manually push the control rods back into the core to cool the reactor. Just as the core is reaching meltdown temperature, the system reboots (seen for a few frames on screen) and then the cooling rods insert themselves. 68.102.68.135 14:12, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

Then by all means change that sentence.  --Vi Veri Veniversum Vivus Vici 14:56, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:A Human Work/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Tintor2 (talk · contribs) 20:49, 15 August 2021 (UTC)

I'll be looking over this article.Tintor2 (talk) 20:49, 15 August 2021 (UTC)

Lead and infobox
The lead seems well written but I would suggest adding an image to the infobox that is significant.
Plot
The Eva 01 needs a brief intro.
"The next morning, everything is back to normal at the Misato residence." Sounds a bit informal like a narrator. I would suggest something like "It was successful in the end".
Production
"Hito no, tsukurishimono" Is it possible to add a translit?
Reception
Theo Kogod (Comic Book Resources) should be "Theo Kogod from Comic Book Resources" to avoid making less importance.
That's all. Since the article isn't that big, there aren't that many issues. Nice work. @TeenAngels1234:.Tintor2 (talk) 02:48, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
@Tintor2: Tried my best.--TeenAngels1234 (talk) 12:16, 16 August 2021 (UTC)

Is it well written?
A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct: 

B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation: 

Is it verifiable with no original research?
A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline: 

B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines: 
C. It contains no original research: 

D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism: 

Is it broad in its coverage?
A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic: 
B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style): 

Is it neutral?
It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each: 
Is it stable?
It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute: 

Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content: 

B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions: 

Overall:
Pass or Fail: 
Good job. Pass.--Tintor2 (talk) 15:03, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
@TeenAngels1234: Good work