# Talk:Bored (Billie Eilish song)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Bored (song)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: K. Peake (talk · contribs) 17:11, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

Might start this tonight if I have the time, or else the review will begin tomorrow --K. Peake 17:11, 27 November 2020 (UTC)


### Infobox and lead
Infobox looks good
"from the soundtrack 13 Reasons Why (A Netflix Original Series Soundtrack)." → "from the soundtrack album, 13 Reasons Why (A Netflix Original Series Soundtrack) (2017)."
Writing sentence should be the second of the para instead and follow it with production still
"The song was released by" → "It was released by"
Wikilink lead single
"Musically a mid-tempo" → "A mid-tempo" with the target
"the lyrics see Eilish" → "the song's lyrics see Eilish"
"received generally mixed reviews" → "has received generally mixed reviews"
"with many deeming it" → "with a number of them deeming it"
"The song has since been" → "The song has been"
"and Polish Society of the Phonographic Industry (ZPAV)." → "and Polish Society of the Phonographic Industry (ZPAV), respectively."
"An accompanying music video for "Bored" was" → "An accompanying music video was"
"In it, It shows Eilish dressed" → "In it, Eilish is shown dressed"
Target Nikes to Nike, Inc.
"hanging off a ladder that goes on" → "while hanging off a ladder that seemingly goes on"
Add a sentence about the video's critical reception
"promoted the song by" → "promoted "Bored" by"
"it during her" → "it for her"


### Background and composition
Writing/production sentences should begin this section instead
"as the lead single for the album" → "as the lead single from" with the wikilink and remove target on the soundtrack
Where is digital download and streaming backed up; Tidal is only streaming? Either find a source that states this or add various citations for the release.
"by Billie Eilish, her brother" → "by Eilish alongside her brother"
"for 13 Reasons Why, and" → "for 13 Reasons Why and"
"as it opened her music" → "due to opening her music"
Target key to Key (music)
Wikilink tempo
Are you sure the stylization is correct for the range that Eilish's vocals span?
Identify music critics as music journalists here instead to prevent repetitive wording, though keep the target
"that makes Eilish feel contempt for an ex-boyfriend" → "that demonstrates Eilish feeling contempt for an ex-lover"


### Reception
Can you get more than three reviews since at least four are needed to give a critical overview?
"has received mainly mixed reviews" → "has been met with mainly mixed reviews"
"saying it was" → "opining that it is"
"Writing for Insider, Courteney Larocca" → "For Insider, Courteney Larocca"
"the layering in Eilish's vocals" → "the layering of Eilish's vocals"
""Bored" has been" → "Commercially, "Bored" was" because this is a new para
"and Polish Society of the Phonographic Industry (ZPAV)." → "and Polish Society of the Phonographic Industry (ZPAV), respectively."


### Promotion
#### Music video
##### Background and synopsis
"climbs up an endless latter." → "climbing up an endless latter in the music video." on the img text
Wikilink music video
"was released on Eilish's Youtube on" → "was released to Eilish's YouTube on" with the wikilink
"with the concept." → "with the concept for it."
"sees her climb and hang off" → "sees her climbing and hanging off"
"dressed in a blue track suit" → "while she is dressed in a blue tracksuit"
Target Nikes to Nike, Inc.
"then talked about the videos" → "also talked about the visual's
Target antigravity to Anti-gravity


##### Critical reception
"received positive reviews from critics." → "was met with positive reviews from critics."
"praised the visual, saying" → "praised the visual, saying:"
"And that she" → "She continued, commenting that Eilish"
"Writing for Idolator, Mike Wass described" → "For Idolator, Mike Wass described"
"described the music video as" → "labeled the music video as"


#### Live performances
Good


### Credits and personnel
Use {{spaced ndash}} so there is the right space between credits and personnel


### Charts
Good


### Certifications
Good


### References
Copyvio score looks decent at 39.0%
Kudos on archiving all of these where possible!
Cite Idolator as work/website instead for ref 7
Literally only the above issue here, great job!


### Final comments and verdict
 On hold once the issues are fixed, though reach out if you are confused about any of the changes I requested to implement. --K. Peake 09:25, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
Thanks a lot for another review Kyle! I have address all of your requests! Lmk if anything else needs to be done. The Ultimate Boss (talk) 01:09, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
The Ultimate Boss  Pass after a very nice job on the response from you, with me only having copyedited one word! --K. Peake 08:13, 29 November 2020 (UTC)