# Talk:Attack on German Flatts (1778)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Attack on German Flatts (1778)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: MathewTownsend (talk · contribs) 01:03, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

I enjoy these articles and wish to review this one.  MathewTownsend (talk) 01:03, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
Comments
background
"He recruited a mix of Iroquois and white Loyalists estimated " - aren't Loyalists by definition  not Indian. I'm not clear what "white" clarifies. Removed Magic♪piano 21:32, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
"He began his campaigning in late May" - began his campaign? Rephrased (especially since the "late May" bit was somewhat repetitive). Magic♪piano 21:32, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
Otherwise, all is well.  MathewTownsend (talk) 20:19, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
Thanks again for reviewing, glad you enjoy them (there are more in this thread on the way). Magic♪piano 21:32, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
GA review-see WP:WIAGA for  criteria (and here for what they are not)

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose: clear and concise, correct spelling and grammar:

B. Complies with  MoS for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation: 

Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. Provides references to all sources: 

B. Provides in-line citations from reliable sources where necessary: 

C. No original research: 

Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Main aspects are addressed: 

B. Remains focused: 

Does it follow the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc: 

Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales: 

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions: 

Overall:
Pass or Fail: 

Nice work!  MathewTownsend (talk) 00:48, 22 February 2012 (UTC)