# Talk:1892 Alabama Cadets football team

This review is transcluded from Talk:1892 Alabama Cadets football team/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: The Rambling Man (talk · contribs) 15:33, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
Comments

Odd placement of the note.  I'd include it as real text in the lead/main article.
I moved the information from the note to the end the paragraph in the Background section.
"variously "Alabama", "UA" or "Bama"" is this necessary?  It's interesting, but is it referenced?
Removed
"with being the person responsible" don't think you need "the person" here.
Removed "the person"
Could link "prep school".
Linked
Why is it called "1892 Alabama Cadets football team" and not "1892 Alabama Cadets football team season"?
The title is called "1892 Alabama Cadets football team" per a consensus at Wikipedia:WikiProject College football/Style guide#Team seasons
"1891–1892" -> "1891–92" per WP:YEAR.
Fixed
"there that first played" that _he_ first...
Corrected
"his brother passed away" died.
Changed
"he enrolled at Alabama. After he enrolled" repetitive.
Reworded
Looks like there's a spare line at the bottom of the schedule table.
The spare line is part of the schedule template used. As this is such an early season, what would normally be listed here (time zone, homecoming, non-conference opponent) does not apply in this article.
I see one result ended 4–5.  Can you explain the scoring at the time this was played?
There is a link to a note explaining this with the source citation in the Schedule section.
The "Drop kick" hash link isn't correct ("Drop kick#American_football)")
Fixed the link
Could consider adding an image or two down the right-hand side to brighten it up a little.  I see some of the images in sub articles are PD...
Images added
Quarterbacks, guards, tackles etc, all jargon I'm afraid, especially for non-US/non-expert readers.  Links?
All linked now
What is The Corolla and why should I care what it said about anything?
Added that The Corolla is the university yearbook to the prose
" team until Eli Abbott was" no need to relink it, and also no need to repeat first name.
Done
No need to relink Alabama here.
Done
We don't need (in English) for English-language sources, it's kind of assumed that since this is English language Wikipedia sources without a language parameter will be in English.
Done
It's in good shape, but pending the resolution of the above comments, I'll place it on hold for the moment.  The Rambling Man (talk) 16:57, 24 July 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the review! I believe I have addressed your concerns, but please feel free to let me know if further changes are in order. Patriarca12 (talk) 17:37, 24 July 2013 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on 1892 Alabama Cadets football team. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/63dbQSj7C?url=http://www.rolltide.com/sports/m-footbl/archive/m-footbl-results-archive.html to http://www.rolltide.com/sports/m-footbl/archive/m-footbl-results-archive.html
Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/63dbQSj7C?url=http://www.rolltide.com/sports/m-footbl/archive/m-footbl-results-archive.html to http://www.rolltide.com/sports/m-footbl/archive/m-footbl-results-archive.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:03, 14 June 2017 (UTC)