# Talk:4th Dimension (song)

This review is transcluded from Talk:4th Dimension (song)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: The Ultimate Boss (talk · contribs) 06:04, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

The Ultimate Boss, thank you for taking this article on; will you have the review completed today most likely? --K. Peake 08:20, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
Well written:
the prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct; 
it complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. 
Verifiable with no original research:
it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline;
all in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines; 
it contains no original research; and 
it contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism. 
Broad in its coverage:
it addresses the main aspects of the topic; and
it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content; and
media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
Overall