# Talk:Andersen–Tawil syndrome

This review is transcluded from Talk:Andersen–Tawil syndrome/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Canada Hky (talk · contribs) 00:02, 15 September 2019 (UTC)

Hello!  I am happy to review this article for GA status.  I will go through and make some comments as I read, and then will run through the checklist at the end, to make sure I haven't missed anything. Canada Hky (talk) 00:02, 15 September 2019 (UTC)


### Initial comments
No copyvio issues.
Images all look good.
In the lead - can you explicitly call out the triad of diagnostic findings?  The last sentence refers to the triad, but I had to go back and piece together what it was - something similar to the first sentence of the signs and symptoms section.  Done
Sub out "mutation" for "variant" or "pathogenic variant".  Done
In the "Cause" section, "mutation" is linked well after its first usage - is there a specific reason for this decision?  Done
For the table in the "Cause" section - while the abbreviation 'ATS' is pretty easy to guess - it isn't defined in the article.  Done
In the "Diagnosis" section - the text says "if 2/3 criteria are met", but there are 4 different criteria listed.  Done
There is inconsistency between "long qt syndrome" and "Long QT syndrome" - I would suggest the former, as it isn't a proper noun, but it should definitely be consistent.  Done
Reference 12 should have an access date.  Done
I will update if I find anything else.  Please let me know if there are any questions.  I am going to put the article on hold for now.  If you think you will need more than the standard 7 days, just let me know.  Canada Hky (talk) 00:23, 15 September 2019 (UTC)

Thanks Canada Hky.  I actioned all the points you have raised above - thanks for spotting those errors.  Anything else?  PeaBrainC (talk) 09:02, 16 September 2019 (UTC)


### Checklist
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, spelling, and grammar):  b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): 

It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):  d (copyvio and plagiarism): 

It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 

It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 

It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 

Overall: Thanks for the opportunity to review this article. It was easy to read, focused and comprehensive!
Pass/Fail: