# Talk:15.ai

Per my GA nomination source checklist, I've removed several unreliable sources from the article. The updated source table can be found below, and I've only included sources that directly mention 15.ai. The source assessment in the talk page comment above this one is inaccurate because it assumes that if an otherwise reliable source cites an unreliable source, then that makes the otherwise reliable source unreliable. This assertion is false per WP:USEBYOTHERS, which states that How accepted and high-quality reliable sources use a given source provides evidence, positive or negative, for its reliability and reputation. The more widespread and consistent this use is, the stronger the evidence. Furthermore, the above assessment fails to consider other language Wikipedias' RSNs and assumes that if a source does not exist in the English RSN, then it must be unreliable. This is false, as in the case of high-quality Russian sources like iXBT Games and StopGame (both considered reliable per Russian WP:VG/RS). In order to set the record straight, I have posted a thorough, in-depth, policy-based assessment of every source used in this article in preparation for the GA nomination. I will be updating this as I do more research, so please leave comments if you'd like, as I may have missed something or made an error. Thank you!

–GM 03:34, 25 September 2025 (UTC)