# Talk:Ace Attorney

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Ace Attorney. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110414123604/http://www.computerandvideogames.com:80/297673/news/ace-attorney-investigations-2-no-plans-for-western-release/ to http://www.computerandvideogames.com/297673/news/ace-attorney-investigations-2-no-plans-for-western-release
Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20070910022526/http://www.tanomi.com:80/saiban/#p2 to http://www.tanomi.com/saiban/
Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20070909110227/http://www.capcom.co.jp:80/gyakutensaiban/topics/060818orchestra/index.html to http://www.capcom.co.jp/gyakutensaiban/topics/060818orchestra/index.html
Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20090221093536/http://www.japancorp.net:80/Article.Asp?Art_ID=19953 to http://www.japancorp.net/Article.Asp?Art_ID=19953
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 06:50, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Ace Attorney/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: ProtoDrake (talk · contribs) 13:01, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

I'll be back in three days with a full review. --ProtoDrake (talk) 13:01, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors: 

B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list: 

Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. Has an appropriate reference section: 

B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary: 

C. No original research: 

Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects: 

B. Focused: 

Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias: 

Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc: 

Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content: 

B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions: 

Overall:
Pass or Fail: 

Since I can't see anything in the references or prose to give me pause, I'd say this merits an Instant Pass. --ProtoDrake (talk) 09:23, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

Thank you.--IDVtalk 09:43, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Ace Attorney. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://toucharcade.com/2017/09/21/ace-attorney-spirit-of-justice-iphone-out-now/
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160304103828/http://gematsu.com/2015/09/ace-attorney-6-announced-3ds to http://gematsu.com/2015/09/ace-attorney-6-announced-3ds
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080803043624/http://ir.capcom.co.jp/english/data/salesdata.html to http://ir.capcom.co.jp/english/data/salesdata.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:01, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

The gameplay section stated, in the photo: A cross-examination from the first game. However, it was from Phoenix Wright: Ace Attorney Justice for All, which is the second game in the series. It is during the first cross-examination of the first case in said game. I modified it.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kid Gamer (talk • contribs) 20:10, 1 June 2018 (UTC) 

Incorrect. This is from the second cross-examination of the second case of the first game. The exclamation marks are the dead giveaway, as they only appear in the first game. Changed back.TurnaboutDave (talk) 22:03, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

Hi,
I've converted text on the releases in the series into two tables to make the data easier to read.
For some unclear reason the second table is rendering in the wrong section even though it is located immediately after the the first table in the wiki mark up in the correct section. Anyone know why?
DomUK (talk) 19:30, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

I object to a sentence claiming that the first game was influenced by queer fanfiction. I removed the sentence, but it can be viewed in the article history just before the reflist. Nononsense101 (talk) 16:21, 7 July 2025 (UTC)

I have readded that but changed the language as the article reference is clear there was no planned romance, but they did go that direction in future works due to fan response and fan works. Masem (t) 17:28, 7 July 2025 (UTC)