# Talk:Ambush predator

The link to the lecture notes is broken.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.251.192.206 (talk) 00:35, 29 January 2010 (UTC) 

Per box at the top of this page, an editor has WP:SELFCITEd with regard to "earthwave".  Those contribs need to be reviewed for NPOV and sourcing.  Once the article is cleaned by an independent editor, the tag can be removed.  If you do that, please leave a note here.  Thanks. Jytdog (talk) 23:01, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

@User:JytdogI think I was the editor who inserted the earthwave reference.  Am I being accused of COI?DrChrissy (talk) 00:44, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
yep she hasn't contributed here. that was a mistake. Jytdog (talk) 02:36, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Ambush predator. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120304131009/http://www.seadb.net/schedule.php?ids=694 to http://www.seadb.net/schedule.php?ids=694
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110713043740/http://www.instantocean.com/sites/InstantOcean/knowledge/seascope/past/SS_Vol18_2001.pdf to http://www.instantocean.com/sites/InstantOcean/knowledge/seascope/past/SS_Vol18_2001.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:11, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Ambush predator. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071231100312/http://www.antiguanracer.org/html/racer/sfiles.htm to http://www.antiguanracer.org/html/racer/sfiles.htm
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://protist.biology.washington.edu/biol454/Lecture%20Notes%20%5B4%20per%20pg%5D/lec_16_predation_4C.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:57, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Ambush predator/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Happy to take a look at this Enwebb (talk · contribs) 14:24, 26 September 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for taking this on. Chiswick Chap (talk) 15:12, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
One of the first things that struck me is that the article looks "cluttered" with images, many of which are sandwiching the text (MOS:SANDWICHING). Not part of the GACR, but perhaps consider ways to rearrange or consolidate images
Done.
Can you gloss explanation of "chelicerae" after usage?
Done.
Inconsistent usage of whether you use just common name (trapdoor spiders; mantis shrimps) or common name followed by linked scientific name ("warteye stargazer (Gillellus uranidea)" "devil scorpionfish (Inimicus filamentosus)")
Fixed.
Some excessively close paraphrasing for my taste. See this diff, this link from Earwig, and this link from the Wayback Machine, showing that the Desert Museum website is not mirroring this WP content, but rather is being closely paraphrased here.
Reworded.
I don't anticipate I will have much more to say, but still need to go over the licensing of all the images used. Enwebb (talk) 14:24, 26 September 2019 (UTC)

I added a CN tag to a paragraph that ended without a citation
Reffed and named example.
Frogfish should be linked at first occurrence in body; currently linked from the lead and from a photo caption
Linked.
For ...striking very hard and fast (mean peak speed 2.30 m/s (5.1 mph) and mean duration 24.98 ms) you should have 5.1 mph enclosed in square brackets per MOS:BRACKET ("If sets of brackets are nested, use different types for adjacent levels of nesting; for two levels, it is customary to have square brackets appear within round brackets") a bit nitpicky, I know :)
Removed one set of brackets.
Is the image of the tasseled wobbegong acceptable to use? The flickr page says all rights reserved
The license was probably changed retroactively, I checked here. Enwebb (talk) 20:21, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
I've used another image which was explicitly reviewed on Flickr and found to be correctly licensed. Chiswick Chap (talk) 07:39, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
Thanks, looks up to scratch with the 6 criteria now. Pass. Enwebb (talk) 15:20, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

Chameleons do not change color to match their surroundings. That's a really old myth.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:810B:C040:834:11D7:4ADF:1AA8:F6A0 (talk) 12:48, 24 February 2021 (UTC)