# Talk:1159 papal election

This review is transcluded from Talk:Papal election, 1159/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
GA review (see here for criteria)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose):  b (MoS): 
Have performed a minor copyedit to remove MoS. The lead need to be extended considerably, probably fivefold. Remember to mention all parts of the article; the lead is to summarize, not introduce, the article.
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 
The bibliography section should cite books within {{cite book}}. All-caps titles should be converted to lower caps—all caps is a matter of typography and not grammar or spelling. The first paragraph under "Death of Adrian IV" should be referenced. Ref 25 and 35 should be in the {{cite web}} template.
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 

It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars etc.: 

It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 

Overall:
Pass/Fail: 
Placing on hold until the addressed matters have been seen to. If you have any questions or comments, feel free to express them here. Arsenikk (talk) 15:51, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
I think it's all done now. CarlosPn 22 Oct 2008 15:35 CET

Congratulations with a Good Article! Arsenikk (talk) 13:48, 22 October 2008 (UTC)