# Talk:Action of 4 August 1800

This review is transcluded from Talk:Action of 4 August 1800/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
GA review (see here for criteria)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose):  b (MoS): 

It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 

It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 

It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 

It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 

Overall:
Pass/Fail: 
Comments:  This is another terrific article, very well done and interesting.  I made a few minor tweaks for wording and punctuation, etc., just to help clarify.  Again, nice nice work!  Auntieruth55 (talk) 17:19, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the review!--Jackyd101 (talk) 19:17, 27 September 2009 (UTC)