# Talk:Augmentative and alternative communication

This review is transcluded from Talk:Augmentative and alternative communication/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: – Quadell (talk) 13:50, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

REFS :) Just logged in to find that all the references are now beutifully organised! Thank you so much Quadell! :) Failedwizard (talk) 10:09, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
Glad to do it! – Quadell (talk) 20:01, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
I spoke with some other reviewers, and the consensus is that the lead, while good, still leaves out too much of the article. If you could add one more paragraph summarizing some of the other sections (in the TOC), I think that'll do it. – Quadell (talk) 20:01, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
Fixed! Well done, and congratulations! – Quadell (talk) 19:53, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
Whoop! Thank you so much for all your help - I think you've now edited the article more than I have.  I really hope to be working with you in the future again - my two little projects from now are to generate a composite image for this site and to sort out the references in Speech_generating_device in preperation for a big extension there.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Failedwizard (talk • contribs) 07:08, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

 This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page.  Peer reviewers: Tyepel.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 15:00, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

There have been at least two attempts to insert into this article that facilitated communication in less than thoroughly debunked. Please read the article-- It is the most thoroughly debunked intervention in all of developmental disabilities. --Wikiman2718 (talk) 00:35, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Why are there two sections called "History"? Is there a good reason for this? --66.244.121.212 (talk) 16:14, 25 July 2020 (UTC)

Should the article include a discussion of Baby sign language? It seems to have some similarities. I will leave the decision to wiser minds than mine. Pete unseth (talk) 16:38, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

To add to this article:  the fact that, since 2018, AAC has been used to communicate with dogs and cats. Source 173.88.246.138 (talk) 02:04, 16 May 2021 (UTC)