# Talk:Bhale Bhale Magadivoy

This review is transcluded from Talk:Bhale Bhale Magadivoy/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Ssven2 (talk · contribs) 13:27, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

I'll review this article. Thank you.  — Ssven2 Speak 2 me 13:27, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors: 

B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists: 

Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. Has an appropriate reference section: 

B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary: 

C. No original research: 

Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects: 

B. Focused: 

Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias: 

Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc: 

Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content: 

B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions: 

Overall: Passed, my queries were met and solved by the nominator.
Pass or Fail: 

@Pavanjandhyala: Don't see any major issues with it. A neat, little article that passes the GA criteria. Congratulations yet again, Pavan!   — Ssven2 Speak 2 me 14:30, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for reviewing the article, Ssven2! Pavanjandhyala (talk) 14:39, 7 December 2015 (UTC)