# Talk:Angela Alsobrooks

The article indicates that Angela Alsobrooks was born in Suitland, Maryland. Unless she was born outside of a medical facility (i.e., mother gave birth at home), the place of birth appears incorrect since Suitland is devoid of public, private, community, or regional medical facilities that are located in and are licensed to handle live births. So...she was likely born at a medical facility outside of Suitland, given her year of birth. →Lwalt ♦ talk 18:36, 5 May 2019 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Angela Alsobrooks/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: Y2hyaXM (talk · contribs) 17:43, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: Jon698 (talk · contribs) 21:05, 31 May 2025 (UTC)

Will start review in due time. Jon698 (talk) 21:05, 31 May 2025 (UTC)

@Y2hyaXM: I have noticed a problem regarding her birthplace. The infobox lists it as Suitland, Maryland, but there is no in-text mention or reference for this. Her birthplace needs to be mentioned in the article's body. Jon698 (talk) 19:15, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
@Jon698 Done. Y2hyaXM (talk) 19:19, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
@Y2hyaXM: Apologies for not noticing this before too, but the same thing applies to her date of birth. Jon698 (talk) 19:22, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
Done. Thanks again Y2hyaXM (talk) 19:24, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
Although the Washington Examiner is not a fully deprecated source at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources, it is determined to have "no consensus". There are two sources from the Washington Examiner in this article [19] and [148]. Could you replace these with better sources? @Y2hyaXM: Jon698 (talk) 23:31, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
@Jon698 The WTOP article cited at [149] works as a replacement for [148], so I just removed that one. I found two new sources to replace [19]. Y2hyaXM (talk) 23:38, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, spelling, and grammar):  b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): 
I have gone through the article and made some copyedits that can be found in edits starting here on 2 June 2025 at 18:42 and ending here on 2 June 2025 at 23:29
It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.
a (reference section):  b (inline citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):  d (copyvio and plagiarism): 
Y2hyaXM added mentions and sourcing for her place of birth and birthdate. I will check 16 of the sources, accounting for 5% of the total.  Source 1 does cover her place of birth and date of birth.  Source 6 does state that her grandfather was resisting arrest.  Source 11 does cover her places of education and her degrees.  Source 16 covers her working as education liaison and executive director.  Source 18 does include that she was student body president and the lists of firsts in her career.  Source 22 lists her work for Al Gore and being a Clinton delegate in 2008.  Source 27 does mention Harris' book, Alsobrooks going to Detroit, and being a delegate.  Source 31 covers Glenn Ivey's endorsement.  Source 38 covers Alsobrooks personally prosecuting Daron Boswell-Johnson  Source 42 covers her prosecutors being divided into the six districts in order to handle region specific issues  Source 46 covers her campaign announcement and date  Source 62 covers her becoming co-chair of the transition teams of Moore and Lierman  Source 64 covers her being the first woman elected county executive  Source 81 covers her announcement of the first COVID-19 case in Prince George's County  Source 85 covers the number of infections and deaths as of March 2021  Sources 135 to 138 do cover her committee assignments
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 
Covers the entirety of her life, campaigns, political positions, and electoral history.
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 
No major neutrality problems present
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 
No edit wars
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 
Multiple images are used to illustrate the article and I added alt text.
Overall: I can find no more problems in this article that is stopping it from becoming a GA. @Y2hyaXM:
Pass/Fail: