# Talk:Air Combat Group RAAF

This review is transcluded from Talk:Air Combat Group RAAF/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

This article is in decent shape, but it needs more work before it becomes a Good Article.
Is it well written?
A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct: 
Well done.
B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation: 

Is it verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check?
A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline: 

B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose): 
In the Operation section, is there a source for this ---> "A detachment of four Australian F/A-18 Hornet fighter aircraft provided air defence for the US military base on the island of Diego Garcia during the campaign against the Taliban, which was called Operation Slipper. The initial detachment was provided by No. 77 Squadron RAAF between December 2001 and 10 February 2002. This detachment was replaced by a detachment from No. 3 Squadron RAAF which was deployed between 10 February 2002 and 20 May 2002. No further Australian units have been deployed to Diego Garcia"?
 Done
C. It contains no original research: 

D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism: 

Is it broad in its coverage?
A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic: 

B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style): 

Is it neutral?
It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each: 

Is it stable?
It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute: 

Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content: 

B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions: 

Overall:
Pass or Fail: 
If the above statement can be answered, I will pass the article. Good luck with improving this article! Also, contact me if the above statements are answered.
--  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:55, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

Thank you to CyclonicWhirlwind for getting the stuff I left at the talk page, because I have gone off and placed the article as GA. Congrats. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 14:14, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Air Combat Group RAAF. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080323123406/http://www.globalcollab.org:80/Nautilus/australia/afghanistan/adf-in-afghanistan-history to http://www.globalcollab.org/Nautilus/australia/afghanistan/adf-in-afghanistan-history
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 04:39, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Air Combat Group RAAF. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080809224742/http://www.defence.gov.au/dmo/asd/air5376/air5376.cfm to http://www.defence.gov.au/dmo/asd/air5376/air5376.cfm
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080905234830/http://www.defence.gov.au/dmo/asd/air5376/phase1.cfm to http://www.defence.gov.au/dmo/asd/air5376/phase1.cfm
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080905234743/http://www.defence.gov.au/dmo/asd/air5376/phase2.cfm to http://www.defence.gov.au/dmo/asd/air5376/phase2.cfm
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080905234711/http://www.defence.gov.au/dmo/asd/air5376/phase3.cfm to http://www.defence.gov.au/dmo/asd/air5376/phase3.cfm
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120209171107/http://www.anao.gov.au/uploads/documents/2006-07_Audit_Report_27.pdf to http://www.anao.gov.au/uploads/documents/2006-07_Audit_Report_27.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:49, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

It has been a while since this has been reviewed, so I took a look and noticed that it has an "outdated" orange banner from 2011. Is this banner still valid? There are also some uncited statements. Should this article go to WP:GAR? Z1720 (talk) 20:00, 28 September 2025 (UTC)