# Talk:Ace Driver

Image:Ace Driver.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 06:02, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Namco System N2 doesn't use a 68020 processor. However, I cannot find where to edit that information box. For anyone who could do a proper edit to that information box, thank you if you can get the information corrected.
--175.167.154.112 (talk) 14:20, 23 March 2019 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Ace Driver/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: MWright96 (talk · contribs) 19:22, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
Will take on this review. MWright96 (talk) 19:22, 3 November 2019 (UTC)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose):  b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): 
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 

It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 

It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 

It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 

Overall:
Pass/Fail: 


### Lede
"and to avoid collision with opponents and other obstacles." - there is the missing word "a" between "avoid" and "collision"  Done
"with assistance by Pole Position designer Shinichiro Okamoto." - from  Done
"The arcade cabinet is known for being heavier than Namco's other cabinets," - try to avoid using the phrase "is known for"  Done
"The development team took care into producing the game's controls to make them responsive and easy to use, which Okamoto recalls being as responsive as moving a shopping cart." - replace one of the mentions of the word "responsive" with a similarly formal word  Done
"A PlayStation home conversion was announced in 1995, but was never released." - How about A PlayStation home conversion announced in 1995 went unreleased.?  Done


### Gameplay
"The player can also choose between Automatic or Manual transmission, which respectively disable and enable the use of the gear shift," - this text is not mentioned in the source coupled with it. Thus an additional reference that explicitly states this information will be required
"Cars also carry advertisements featuring names of older" - you're missing the word "the" between "featuring" and "names" in this sentence
"The player can also choose between Automatic or Manual transmission," - the word "an" is needed between the words "between" and "Automatic"  Done


### Development and release
"with assistance by Pole Position designer Shinichiro Okamoto." - same issue as raised with the second point in the lede section  Done
"is known for being much heavier than Namco's other arcade cabinets," - same issue as raised with the third point in the lede section  Done
I haven't seen this issue addressed at all in the article. MWright96 (talk)
"was stated to have been dangerous if the cabinet was placed up against the wall," - I believe in the event would be a better substitute to replace the text highlighted in bold style="background: #FFD; color:black; vertical-align: middle; text-align: center; " class="partial table-partial"|Some


### Reception
"being praised for its impressive technological capabilities and realistic graphics." - by whom? Players, reviewers, the gaming industery?  Done
"The game was also a commercial hit" Commerical hit looks informal to my eyes. It could be easily stated that the game was a "Commercial success"  Done
"thanks to the Namco Super System 22 arcade hardware it ran on." - better; due to its Namco Super System 22 arcade operating hardware.  Done
"They concluded their review with that" - by saying style="background: #FFD; color:black; vertical-align: middle; text-align: center; " class="partial table-partial"|Some
"and bad collision detection," - the word poor is a more formal to replace the text in bold in this section of text
Have not seen any changes regarding the point above. MWright96 (talk) 13:07, 6 November 2019 (UTC)


### Sequels and legacy
"featuring additional tracks and vehicles to select, alongside a new "Championship" gameplay mode." - elimimnate the text in bold because it is redundant  Done
"A home conversion of Ace Driver for the PlayStation was announced to be in development in August 1995, however it was never released." - in August 1995; it was not released.  Done
"The soundtrack for Ace Driver was released in 1995 by Victor Entertainment as part of their Namco Game Sound Express album series." -  this statement is currently uncited and will require a reliable source to be attacted to it  Done
Also, the same sentence could be reworded to say Victor Entertainment released the soundtrack to Ace Driver as part of its Namco Game Sound Express album series in 1995.  Done


### References
References 3, 4, 6 and 8 needed to state the languages in which they were written in
I intentionally didn't include the language name for the first three refs as I found them redundant to have, since the titles are already in Japanese and it seems pretty obvious to readers that the articles themselves are in Japanese. Namcokid47 (Contribs) 00:17, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
The link in the fifth references directs the reader to pages 10 and 11 and not 30 and 30 as stated in the article mainspace  Done
The archive link for reference 11 directs the user to a 404 error page. This will need to be addressed  Done
Overall there are some minor issues concerning the prose in the article, along with some information included that is not explicitly stated in the sources provided, some of the links to view the references that are used and the non-inclusion of language parameters in all three of the foreign language sources. Will put the review on hold. MWright96 (talk) 21:07, 3 November 2019 (UTC)

@MWright96: Okay, I believe I fixed everything you brought up in the review. Namcokid47 (Contribs) 03:52, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
@MWright96: Fixed the rest of the issues that I forgot to correct. Namcokid47 (Contribs) 15:29, 6 November 2019 (UTC)