# Talk:1962 Pacific hurricane season

Consider this the pre-GAN review. First, it needs a season summary section like the 1950 Pacific hurricane season. Second, the depressions should be merged to an other storms section IMO per 1987 Pacific hurricane season, 1968 Pacific hurricane season, and 1975 Pacific hurricane season. For Claudia, there is a qute a good amount of info here. For Valerei, there is some info here. Hope that helps. YE  Pacific Hurricane 14:26, 27 September 2011 (UTC)

Why does it need a summary if it's so short? Thanks for the extra info. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk)  14:28, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
Overall consistency. The 1950 Pacific hurricane season has one, why not this season? It should be a few sentences comparing this year to average and stuff like that.YE  Pacific Hurricane
Well, I think some of the summary there is extraneous (such as no majors, unsourced speculation on why there were so few storms). I also think it's wrong to mention climatology, since the average season is only based on post-satellite imagery. I checked the Valerie, there wasn't much new, although thanks for the Claudia bit. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk)  14:47, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
Would you say it could be GAN'd now? --♫ Hurricanehink (talk)  20:03, 27 September 2011 (UTC)

Yea, go for it. YE  Pacific Hurricane 22:49, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
Why don't we have boxes with TC stats for each system?  I haven't seen an annual article pass through GAN without all the storm-related boxes included.  Thegreatdr (talk) 05:24, 29 September 2011 (UTC)

The track maps are missing for some reason. YE  Pacific Hurricane 13:30, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
No, I just opted not to include them. I didn't feel like they helped the article particularly, given that most of them followed the same track (developing off of Mexico, move (west)northwestward and dissipated. I only included the infoboxes for the hurricanes since they were the only ones to make landfall. However, I added Claudia due to it being the highest impact storm of the season. It was merely an editor's decision. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk)  14:07, 29 September 2011 (UTC)

I deliberately left out the infoboxes, considering several of the storms are only a sentence or two. Considering most of them have a rather similar track (or there is no track at all), do we really need to have an infobox for all of them? --♫ Hurricanehink (talk)  19:26, 22 December 2011 (UTC)

Agreed, if no one objects I will remove them. YE  Pacific Hurricane 19:38, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
I've added a timeline to this season, to show when these storms have formed. I have also added a few more storm boxes, the winds may not be right but it shows what category it is. STO12  —Preceding undated comment added 19:32, 22 December 2011 (UTC). 

The timeline is fine, but the boxes weren't needed, IMO, per above. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk)  21:03, 22 December 2011 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on 1962 Pacific hurricane season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110929181403/http://rfcd.pima.gov/largefiles/pdli2/appxa.pdf to http://rfcd.pima.gov/largefiles/pdli2/appxa.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:49, 14 September 2016 (UTC)