# Talk:2002–03 Arsenal F.C. season

Looking around other season reviews and skim reading them, would you think that it would be best for this article to be structured with brief, informative monthly reviews or keep it the way it originally was intended to be. Lemonade51 (talk) 22:25, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/football/teams/a/arsenal/2157063.stm
In 2002–03 Arsenal F.C. season on 2011-05-25 07:26:37, 404 Not Found
In 2002–03 Arsenal F.C. season on 2011-06-11 05:07:55, 404 Not Found
--JeffGBot (talk) 05:08, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

http://www.thefa.com/TheFACup/TheFACup/NewsAndFeatures/Postings/2003/04/45873.htm
In Graham Barber on 2011-03-22 11:18:15, 404 Not Found
In 2002–03 Arsenal F.C. season on 2011-05-25 07:26:39, 404 Not Found
In 2002–03 Arsenal F.C. season on 2011-06-11 05:08:04, 404 Not Found
--JeffGBot (talk) 05:08, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:2002–03 Arsenal F.C. season/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: TBrandley (talk · contribs) 16:57, 11 July 2012 (UTC)


### Issues
#### General
One dab link to David Weir
One dead link: Ref. 43


#### Lede
Link Manchester United
Has been linked in the first paragraph of the lead.
Link Bolton Wanderers


#### Background
Link Liverpool
Link Manchester United
"the winning goal scored by Sylvain Wiltord" perhaps this: "the winning goal was scored by Sylvain Wiltord"
Link Chelsea


#### FA Cup
"Chelsea defender John Terry put Chelsea" too many uses of Chelsea


#### References
Some ref.s use guardian.co.uk, and use The Guardian. Please choose only one
The way I see it, The Guardian refers to the newspaper publication (anything written for the paper), 'guardian.co.uk' is things published on the website. They are two different things. Thankfully every Guardian web page has an 'article details' section to help differentiate matters.
All I could find. Good work, and on hold. Other sections have no issues. TBrandley 04:33, 20 July 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for your review. Have addressed all comments unless stated. Lemonade51 (talk) 13:40, 20 July 2012 (UTC)