# Talk:Bell Boeing V-22 Osprey

All the following enties lack sources:
AN/ARC-182 VHF/UHF radio
KY-58 VHF/UHF encryption
ANDVT HF encryption
AN/AAR-47 Missile Approach Warning System
AN/AYK-14 Mission Computers
APQ-168 Multifunction radar
I'm not saying they're wrong, but what I AM saying is that sources are required. 2.25.65.76 (talk) 11:19, 29 November 2023 (UTC)

BilCat removed annotated links from the See also section, with the edit summary that they are not optimal. (This is opening the discussion in BRD.)

An edit does not have to be optimal, just better than what was there before, to justify it remaining in an article.
MoS recommends annotations to lists of links, for the benefit of the reader, including in 'See also sections'. Most short descriptions are better as annotations than no annotation.
There is nothing preventing any editor from replacing a sub-optimal annotation, or any other sub-optimal addition to an article with an optimal one (or even just a better sub-optimal one - better is better, removal of something which was better, is worse.)
Therefore reverting template generated annotated links without replacing them with something better or an adequate reason why the specific link should not be annotated, could be seen as tendentious at best, disruptive at worst. 
If any given short description can be improved, it should be improved, as that improves two articles at a minimum. If it cannot be improved, the annotated link template for that link should be either replaced by a better local annotation, ideally referenced to a reasonably reliable source, or an explanation provided why that specific link should not have an annotation at all.
If an editor feels strongly enough that short descriptions are generally worse than no annotation at all they can start a community wide RfC explaining why annotated links should not be used for this purpose, as in almost all cases there has been no pushback at all, and there is currently only one place that agreement has been reached not to use them, which is in disambiguation pages, and most of those objections are no longer valid. Also disambiguation pages mostly have appropriate local annotations already, so there is no clear need. Cheers, · · · Peter Southwood (talk): 07:25, 30 August 2024 (UTC)

the 1st VTOL was designed and manufactured by Canadaire Montreal Quebec, flew in 1965 ... 52.124.118.57 (talk) 22:15, 28 June 2025 (UTC)

You seem to be referring to the Canadair CL-84 Dynavert.  The V-22 is about 25 years newer and not closely related. -Fnlayson (talk) 22:46, 28 June 2025 (UTC)