# Talk:Battle of Kettle Creek

This review is transcluded from Talk:Battle of Kettle Creek/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: MathewTownsend (talk · contribs) 17:42, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

Happy to review this as I love this topic!  MathewTownsend (talk) 17:42, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
Comments
"The prisoners, of whom only about 20 survived their wounds, were first taken to Augusta, and then Ninety Six, along with a large number of other Loyalists."  - I don't understand this sentence.
I made a few edits for my own understanding of the article, spelling etc.[1] But feel free to revert any you don't like.
I'll put this article on hold, pending clarification of that one sentence that I can't figure out  MathewTownsend (talk) 00:00, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
Your edits looked mostly fine, just a few minor tweaks needed.  I've rephrased the problematic sentence; let me know if the change didn't help... Magic♪piano 15:10, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
GA review-see WP:WIAGA for  criteria (and here for what they are not)

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose: clear and concise, correct spelling and grammar:

B. Complies with  MoS for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation: 

Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. Provides references to all sources: 

B. Provides in-line citations from reliable sources where necessary: 

C. No original research: 

Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Main aspects are addressed: 

B. Remains focused: 

Does it follow the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc: 

Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales: 

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions: 

Overall:
Pass or Fail: 

Looks great! Everything is clarified.  MathewTownsend (talk) 15:37, 12 January 2012 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Battle of Kettle Creek. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120423002713/http://www.washingtonwilkes.org/tourism/attractions/landmark?Id=632 to http://www.washingtonwilkes.org/tourism/attractions/landmark?Id=632
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927225354/http://www.southernhistory.net/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=9482&mode=thread&order=0&thold=0 to http://www.southernhistory.net/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=9482&mode=thread&order=0&thold=0
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:40, 28 October 2016 (UTC)