# Talk:Avnillah-class ironclad

This review is transcluded from Talk:Avnillah-class ironclad/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Peacemaker67 (talk · contribs) 04:37, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

in Design, "limited by the Ottoman Empire's limited" perhaps change one to "restricted"?
Works for me
in Characteristics, where were the 75 mm QF guns mounted? Did she originally have a secondary battery?
The sources don't say, unfortunately.
suggest centring the Laid down and Completed columns in the table for consistent appearance.
I'm not sure if that's possible with merged cells
Done. Peacemaker67  (click to talk to me) 01:08, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
Ah, I have quite a few articles to copy that template over to! Parsecboy (talk) 01:25, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
link Constantinople
Done
worth pointing out in either the table or text that both Thames Iron Works and Samuda Brothers were in London, from the name, I assumed Samuda was a local yard until I followed the link
Good idea
which Gio. Ansaldo & C. yards were they rebuilt at?
Added
worth mentioning and linking/redlinking the two armored cruisers that sank Avnillah, I assume this information is available and they would be notable?
Good idea
suggest using the NHHC licence template for both images, along with PD-USGov-Military-Navy
Done
That's me done. Placing on hold for these points to be addressed. Peacemaker67  (click to talk to me) 06:28, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

Thanks Peacemaker. Parsecboy (talk) 00:13, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
No prob. This article is well-written, verifiable using reliable sources, covers the subject well, is neutral and stable, and is illustrated by appropriately licensed images with appropriate captions. Passing. Peacemaker67  (click to talk to me) 01:08, 18 May 2017 (UTC)