# Talk:1927 Lompoc earthquake

This review is transcluded from Talk:1927 Lompoc earthquake/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: Dora the Axe-plorer (talk · contribs) 06:27, 16 February 2025 (UTC)
Reviewer: Dawnseeker2000 (talk · contribs) 04:24, 22 February 2025 (UTC)

I'll take this one. Dawnseeker2000 04:24, 22 February 2025 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, spelling, and grammar):  b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): 

It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.
a (reference section):  b (inline citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):  d (copyvio and plagiarism): 

It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 
This is pretty good coverage for a 98-year-old event
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 

It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 

Overall:
Pass/Fail: 


### Comments
After having read the article and working on a few sentences that weren't totally clear to me, I think this easily meets the limited criteria for a good article. Nice work, Dawnseeker2000 05:28, 22 February 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for reviewing and fixing some of the language. Cheers Dora the Axe-plorer (explore) 05:49, 22 February 2025 (UTC)