# Talk:Avonmouth railway station

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Avonmouth railway station's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "maggsbprp":
From Shirehampton railway station: Maggs, Colin (1975). The Bristol Port Railway and Pier. The Oakwood Press. pp. 3–7, 10–12, 15–18, 23–24, 47–51.
From Montpelier railway station: Maggs, Colin (1975). The Bristol Port Railway and Pier. The Oakwood Press. pp. 13, 19, 37–39, 47–51.
From Sea Mills railway station: Maggs, Colin (1975). The Bristol Port Railway and Pier. The Oakwood Press. pp. 3–7, 12, 15–18, 23–24, 47–51.
From Clifton Down railway station: Maggs, Colin (1975). The Bristol Port Railway and Pier. The Oakwood Press.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 13:38, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Avonmouth railway station/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: FallingGravity (talk · contribs) 07:58, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

FallingGravity, thanks very much fore reviewing this. -mattbuck (Talk) 11:26, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

Well written ✗ Fail
"The BPRP ran in to trouble" → "The BPRP ran into trouble"
Done. -mattbuck (Talk) 11:19, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
"Ove the course of the war" → "Over(?) the course of the war"
Done. -mattbuck (Talk) 11:19, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
"Service levels had decreased slightly by 1955 to 28 from Bristol" Minor nitpick, but at first it seems like the service levels decreased by 1955.
Done. -mattbuck (Talk) 11:19, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
"The last remaining station building, the old parcels office, is threatened with demolition." Who or what is threatening the building with demolition?
That's very nitpicky (my hero!), but done. -mattbuck (Talk) 11:19, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
"declined an option" Where did this option come from?
It was part of the original contract. -mattbuck (Talk) 11:19, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
I have now amended this in all articles that use that text. -mattbuck (Talk) 10:55, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Verifiable 
Just looking at the references, there are a lot of errors, mostly external links in work parameters. Also the hidden categories say there's some Extra text in some of the references.
I think that's new, I've been using external links in the work parameter for years and it hasn't been a problem before. I've seen Rodw removing some from other articles, I'll remove these. -mattbuck (Talk) 11:19, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
There also seems to be a problem with <ref name=bids>.
Hm, not sure how I missed that. Fixed. -mattbuck (Talk) 11:26, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
Ref #8 is currently a dead link.
Typo in the url. Fixed. -mattbuck (Talk) 19:25, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
Images  Pass
They look good and I didn't see anything wrong with the licenses.
Broad and Neutral  Pass
I don't see any problems and it's a pretty extensive article on the subject.
Closing remarks
Sorry this took a little while to close. Almost all concerns I've found that would hinder GA status have been resolved by nominator. I'm not really an expert on the subject but I think this article does the station some justice. FallingGravity (talk) 15:18, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
FallingGravity, your efforts are much appreciated. My thanks. -mattbuck (Talk) 15:23, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Avonmouth railway station. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120314050333/http://www.walesandwest.co.uk/ to http://www.walesandwest.co.uk/
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120120002540/http://www.thisisbristol.co.uk/Campaign-trains-Bristol-Temple-Meads-half-hour/story-14446079-detail/story.html to http://www.thisisbristol.co.uk/Campaign-trains-Bristol-Temple-Meads-half-hour/story-14446079-detail/story.html
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120708233227/http://www.thisisbristol.co.uk/100-million-Bristol-Metro-train-network-2016/story-16492523-detail/story.html to http://www.thisisbristol.co.uk/100-million-Bristol-Metro-train-network-2016/story-16492523-detail/story.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:12, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Avonmouth railway station. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131014212403/http://www.networkrail.co.uk/documents/3111_Route_2013_Great_Western_Main_Line.pdf to http://www.networkrail.co.uk/documents/3111_Route_2013_Great_Western_Main_Line.pdf
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070928010205/http://www.rail-reg.gov.uk/upload/xls/stat_usage.xls to http://www.rail-reg.gov.uk/upload/xls/stat_usage.xls
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130413065743/http://www.networkrail.co.uk/uploadedFiles/networkrailcouk/Contents/Improvements/The_Great_Western/WesternVision.pdf to http://www.networkrail.co.uk/uploadedFiles/networkrailcouk/Contents/Improvements/The_Great_Western/WesternVision.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:38, 12 July 2017 (UTC)