# Talk:2013 Critérium du Dauphiné

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of 2013 Critérium du Dauphiné's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "CN3":
From 2013 Paris–Nice: Cossins, Peter (6 March 2013). "Talansky outsprints breakaway group for biggest career win". Cyclingnews.com. Future plc. Retrieved 6 March 2013.
From 2013 Volta a Catalunya: "Quintana triumphs on Vallter 2000 summit finish". Cyclingnews.com. Future plc. 20 March 2013. Retrieved 21 March 2013.
From 2013 Tirreno–Adriatico: "Sagan speeds to soggy Tirreno-Adriatico stage win". Cyclingnews.com. Future plc. 8 March 2013. Retrieved 9 March 2013.
From 2012 Critérium du Dauphiné: Benson, Daniel (6 June 2012). "Boasson Hagen wins sprint on stage 3 of Dauphine". Cycling News. Future Publishing Limited. Retrieved 6 June 2012.
From 2013 Tour of the Basque Country: "Henao edges Betancur on climb to Trapagaran". Cyclingnews.com. Future plc. 3 April 2013. Retrieved 3 April 2013.
From 2013 Tour Down Under: Malone, Alex (24 January 2013). "Slagter takes tough victory into Stirling". Cyclingnews.com. Future plc. Retrieved 1 February 2013.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 16:17, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

Linking the stages 1-8 would be more comfortable to the reader [1]. Moreover, unfounded reverting [2] is very unpleasant. --46.115.74.172 (talk) 11:58, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

I am copyediting the article, and will place any questions I have here.

What does "was expected to result in a reduced bunch sprint" mean?
I think what I meant was that the result was going to involve a smaller group from the peloton as a whole at the finish line. I shall rephrase from there.
What does "who nearly caught Warbasse for two minutes" mean?
Riders started at one-minute intervals during the stage; Docker had started two minutes after Warbasse, and Docker almost caught him before the finish. I shall clarify with the one-minute intervals point.
-- Mike Christie (talk - contribs -  library) 09:27, 10 April 2014 (UTC)

Hopefully that clarifies your queries, Mike. Craig(talk) 19:27, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
Those fixes look good; both comments struck. Mike Christie (talk - contribs -  library) 11:45, 17 April 2014 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:2013 Critérium du Dauphiné/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Mike Christie (talk · contribs) 11:08, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
This is a fine article; I've copyedited and have left a couple of minor comments on the talk page, but those would not prevent me from passing it for GA. The only issue I can see is the use of the Inner Ring blog; can you say why this should be regarded as a reliable source?  It's used nine times in the article.

The Inner Ring was the one reference I had been questioning myself, even before putting the article up for GA. I shall strive to find alternative sources for the elements referenced by that sites. Craig(talk) 19:29, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
Otherwise everything looks good -- prose is in good shape, coverage is broad, I don't see any MoS violations, and the images all seem to be appropriately licensed.  I've placed the article on hold pending resolution of the source issue. Mike Christie (talk - contribs -  library) 11:08, 10 April 2014 (UTC)

Fixes look good; I'm passing this. Mike Christie (talk - contribs -  library) 11:48, 17 April 2014 (UTC)