# Talk:2021 EFL League Two play-off final

It looked like the foul leading up to the winning penalty was outside the penalty area.

Hi TRM, Can you pls check/tweak Ref 11? The URL is same Newport as ref 12). I think it should be this but totals don't match ie Gomes 16 and Stockton 15. JennyOz (talk) 18:18, 28 June 2021 (UTC)

JennyOz cheers, fixed.  Gomes' 16 includes the one he scored in the in final, hence why they're both listed in the article as having 15 in the regular season.  Thanks, good spot. The Rambling Man (Stay alert! Control the virus! Save lives!!!!) 19:44, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for clarifying TRM, JennyOz (talk) 10:53, 29 June 2021 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:2021 EFL League Two play-off Final/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Casliber (talk · contribs) 01:02, 15 July 2021 (UTC)

Taking a look now...you know the drill...Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 01:02, 15 July 2021 (UTC)

The referee for the match, played in front of 9,083 spectators in sunny conditions, was Bobby Madley. - subject change between clauses makes this read funnily, try " The match was played in front of 9,083 spectators in sunny conditions, and refereed by Bobby Madley." (actually run-on and not great but you get the idea...)
Regular time in the match ended goalless and the game went into extra time.  - reads oddly...needs a rephrase...
The match kicked off around 3 p.m. on 31 May 2021 in sunny conditions with 9,083 spectators in attendance.  - is "in attendance" necessary?
1. Well written?:

Prose quality: 
Manual of Style compliance: 
2. Factually accurate and verifiable?:

References to sources: 
Citations to reliable sources, where required: 
No original research: 
3. Broad in coverage?:

Major aspects: 
Focused: 
4. Reflects a neutral point of view?:

Fair representation without bias: 
5. Reasonably stable?

No edit wars, etc. (Vandalism does not count against GA): 
6. Illustrated by images, when possible and appropriate?:

Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales: 
Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions: 

Overall: 

Pass or Fail:  - a couple of minor issues....nearly there Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 01:55, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
Casliber thanks for your review, I'd addressed your concerns I hope, but don't hesitate to give me a shout if there's anything else I can do.  Cheers. The Rambling Man (Stay alert! Control the virus! Save lives!!!!) 08:36, 15 July 2021 (UTC)