# Talk:Aquilegia chaplinei

The supporting page says that 'The name (of the plant) proposed by Lott was not broadly accepted outside of Texas, where it is used by the Lady Bird Johnson Wildflower Center of the University of Texas at Austin.' This is not the same thing as saying that the plant 'is generally considered a distinct species, except in Texas, where it is considered a variety of the golden columbine', as the hook claims. The fact that a single university centre in Texas uses a name doesn't mean that all biologists in Texas obligatorily use it, or even that most do. (It makes it sound like one of these cases where different states of the US have different laws - 'XYZ is generally legal, except in Texas, where it is considered illegal' - but I don't think science works like this.) Maybe one of the cited sources does nevertheless contain a claim like that, but the fact remains that the article doesn't. This would appear to be another case of a DYK hook that is, in practice, clickbait. 62.73.72.3 (talk) 06:02, 10 January 2025 (UTC)