# Talk:Betsimisaraka people

This review is transcluded from Talk:Betsimisaraka people/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Cirt (talk · contribs) 04:38, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

I will review this article. — Cirt (talk) 04:38, 2 October 2015 (UTC)


### Successful good article nomination
I am glad to report that this article nomination for good article status has been promoted. This is how the article, as of October 2, 2015, compares against the six good article criteria:

1. Well written?: One can tell that this article was written primarily by someone with an expert-level knowledge of the subject matter, and a strong command of the English language. And yet, the writing style is accessible to the reader and the average layman, at the same time.
2. Verifiable?: Duly cited throughout, to excellent sources, with good overall citation style format.
3. Broad in coverage?: Covers major aspects of History, Society, and Culture, perhaps better than most other encyclopedic works on the same subject matter.
4. Neutral point of view?: Presented in an neutrally worded tone with matter of fact presentation style.
5. Stable? Upon my inspection of article edit history and article talk page history, no issues going back several months.
6. Images?: Four (4) images, all hosted on Wikimedia Commons, all check out upon inspection of image pages. One minor suggestion -- suggest adding image location data to those image pages with geographic coordinates.
Simply excellent quality improvement effort. Most impressive. If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to have it Good article reassessed. Thank you to all of the editors who worked hard to bring it to this status, and congratulations.— — Cirt (talk) 20:01, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Betsimisaraka people. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/68yH14BWw?url=http://www.iss.org.za/Pubs/Papers/68/Paper68.PDF to http://www.iss.org.za/Pubs/Papers/68/Paper68.PDF
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:58, 19 July 2017 (UTC)