# Talk:Abu Ali Iyad

This review is transcluded from Talk:Abu Ali Iyad/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Harrison49 (talk) 21:08, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality: 

B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists: 
The article maintains a good layout and style throughout.
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources: 

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary: 

C. No original research: 
The article is well referenced.
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects: 

B. Focused: 
The article covers the major aspects
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias: 
The article maintains a neutral point of view.
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc: 
The article does not appear to be subject to edit warring.
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales: 

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions: 

Overall:
Pass or Fail: 
A very informative article. Harrison49 (talk) 22:21, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Abu Ali Iyad. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110727063419/http://www.zajel.org/article_view.asp?newsID=2331&cat=1 to http://www.zajel.org/article_view.asp?newsID=2331&cat=1
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:14, 3 October 2016 (UTC)