# Talk:Armement Air-Sol Modulaire

This review is transcluded from Talk:Armement Air-Sol Modulaire/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 05:16, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality: 
Spell out and link all acronyms the first time you use them and put the abbreviation next to the term. Convert all metric measurements to English units in the infobox and the main body.
B. MoS compliance: 
Non-governmental references need publisher information. Press releases are OK.
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources: 

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary: 

C. No original research: 

Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects: 

B. Focused: 

Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias: 

Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc: 

Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales: 

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions: 

Overall:
Pass or Fail: 

Hello and thanks for the review. I've already provided conversions for all metric measurements and spelled out abbreviations however, i'm not so sure about what you mean by providing publisher information for non-governmental references. According to WP:CITEHOW 
Citations for World Wide Web articles typically include:

name of the author(s)
title of the article within quotation marks
name of the website (linked to a Wikipedia article about the site if it exists, or to Website's "about" page)
date of publication
page number(s) (if applicable)
the date you retrieved it (required if the publication date is unknow
All of this info is already provided so what else is needed? --Victor12 (talk) 15:15, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

There are no links to the home pages of Interavia, Ixarm, Defense Industry Daily or Ares. That's what I meant by publisher.
OK, I've just inserted the links. --Victor12 (talk) 21:59, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

I signal of use for 2011 military intervention in Libya. L'amateur d'aéroplanes, french wiki

I heard about this bomb after the first mali air strikes. On some websites and even in this artikle they are called a 'missle'. From my point of view, a missle as a engine, while a bomb uses the potential height + maybe wings for gliding.

I echo to a certain extant the previous comment. At the bottom of the article in the section on Libya, it calls it a "missile" and a "bomb" several times within a few lines. I think the person who posted above me missed that it DOES include a rocket motor, so it's not solely a bomb, but it is not a missile either. I'd call it a "boosted glide bomb", which also happens to be a precision-guided-munition. Perhaps a clear statement of this would be in order to dispel any confusion? It seems simple enough when one reads the description, but apparently not simple enough for some people. .45Colt 13:39, 30 March 2014 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on AASM. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081112141006/http://www.sagem-ds.com/eng/site.php?spage=03019900&idpress=32 to http://www.sagem-ds.com/eng/site.php?spage=03019900&idpress=32
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090430020807/http://www.sagem-ds.com:80/eng/site.php?spage=03019900&idpress=62 to http://www.sagem-ds.com/eng/site.php?spage=03019900&idpress=62
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100727060513/http://www.sagem-ds.com:80/eng/site.php?spage=03019900&idpress=141 to http://www.sagem-ds.com/eng/site.php?spage=03019900&idpress=141
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101206092312/http://www.mbda-systems.com/mbda/site/ref/scripts/EN_AASM_345.html to http://www.mbda-systems.com/mbda/site/ref/scripts/EN_AASM_345.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:50, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on AASM. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110715230547/http://www.sagem-ds.com/spip.php?article769 to http://www.sagem-ds.com/spip.php?article769
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111013130846/http://defense-update.com/20111012_france-spent-over-1000-bombs-and-missiles-in-the-7-month-libyan-campaign.html to http://defense-update.com/20111012_france-spent-over-1000-bombs-and-missiles-in-the-7-month-libyan-campaign.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:26, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

Hello, I am from Belgorod (Russia), and this is my first time ever writing anything on Wikipedia, hence I have a question... That will likely be removed, or just rejected since it's the Wikipedia, known for it's huge bias regarding this topic. Will there ever be any mentions on this page of (so far thankfully unsuccessful) usage of these Hammers against my city? I am used to the complete ignorance of local suffering and deaths in western mainstream media, but after this all is over, is there any chance for the actual truth to be written later on Wikipedia? Thanks. 217.107.194.43 (talk) 06:40, 12 May 2024 (UTC)

Hello, the usage of that weapon in the Russian invasion of Ukraine conflict is already mentioned in the article. If you think that specific events should be included, you can propose them here. Don't forget to provide a source as it is needed to make any change to the article. --McSly (talk) 12:32, 12 May 2024 (UTC)