# Talk:Battle of Burton Bridge (1322)

Nice piece of work - I had been compiling information on this for a short article but this is much better than I could have achieved.  I think you could be a bit fuller on the battle.  There is evidence that other bridges were broken in the area, for example, to impede the royal army[1].  Good picture of the bridge but maybe a description ?(it's covered in the VCH). Classed as C but with a little more on the battle, could easily be B.Monstrelet (talk) 09:53, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for taking a look at the article.  I was hoping to find more detail for the actual battle section (as it is a bit sparse at the moment) but couldn't find anything in a reliable enough source.  I will have another look and see if I can get a description of the bridge in there as well.  Cheers - Dumelow (talk) 12:35, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

Could the Roger d'Amory article be updated to include his posthumous execution mentioned in this article? It currently states (or at least implies) that he was captured alive. -M.Nelson (talk) 02:25, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Battle of Burton Bridge (1322)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Khazar2 (talk · contribs) 21:24, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
I'll be glad to take this review. In the next few days, I'll do a close readthrough, noting here any issues I can't immediately fix myself, and then follow with the criteria checklist. Thanks in advance for your work on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 21:24, 25 February 2013 (UTC)


### Checklist
This article is excellently written and sourced; I see no significant problems on my first pass. Very fine work--thanks for all the effort you put into it.
I made some very minor copyedits as I went that I'd invite you to double-check. The most persistent issue I noticed is that "the king" and "the earl" were sometimes capitalized and sometimes not. It's my understanding that "king" should generally only be capitalized when preceding a name or in a specific legal term, and I've corrected accordingly, but feel free to revert me if I'm wrong. In either case, though, this usage should be made consistent in the article. -- Khazar2 (talk) 04:05, 26 February 2013 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Battle of Burton Bridge (1322). Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.staffordshire.gov.uk/NR/rdonlyres/D917E5A9-B21E-4CF0-937E-C19D2B89E966/125037/T2TIssue13.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 18:31, 28 March 2016 (UTC)