# Talk:1939–40 Northern Rugby Football League Wartime Emergency League season

Just a thought, but the template at the bottom of the page showing all the seasons by year still has these wartime years in red because the page has not been created. Should there not be a way to connect these via some redirect one way or the other, so that viewers of other pages are able to come to these pages via the template. It would just tidy up a loose end IMHO. Rimmer1993 (talk) 17:54, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
Very good idea, but unfortunately I cannot find the way to do it, can you? Alanfromwakefield (talk) 09:23, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
Done using redirect command after creating the missing pages. Thanks for joining in the Rugby League project as well. We need all the help we can get. Rimmer1993 (talk) 18:20, 1 December 2011 (UTC)
Thank you. I wish I was clever like you. Please would you like to do the same with the first world war league tables Alanfromwakefield (talk) 10:48, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
Done.Rimmer1993 (talk) 13:46, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
Thanks again Alanfromwakefield (talk) 12:24, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on 1939–40 Northern Rugby Football League Wartime Emergency League season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120426143636/http://www.hullfc.com/FixturesAndResults.aspx to http://www.hullfc.com/fixturesandresults.aspx
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:18, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on 1939–40 Northern Rugby Football League Wartime Emergency League season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100706041344/http://www.warringtonwolves.org/results-archive?y=1900 to http://www.warringtonwolves.org/results-archive?y=1900
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100706041344/http://www.warringtonwolves.org/results-archive?y=1900 to http://www.warringtonwolves.org/results-archive?y=1900
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:14, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:1939–40 Northern Rugby Football League Wartime Emergency League season/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Kosack (talk · contribs) 19:35, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

I'll take this one on, review will be up as soon as possible. Kosack (talk) 19:35, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
Initial review


### Lead
"The Challenge Cup competition was not played.", perhaps worth adding more context for this. The Challenge Cup article states that this is is the only season outside World War I that the competition was not held. Perhaps something along the lines of, "The Challenge Cup competition, traditionally run alongside the league, was not played for the first time since 1919"?
 Done


### Planned season
Pipe St Helens Recs to St Helens Recreation RLFC to avoid the redirect.
 Done


### Suspension of the League
Pipe friendlies to Exhibition game to avoid the redirect.
 Done


### Yorkshire competition
"The winter of 1939–40", the season wouldn't incorporate the winter of 1940 so would "the winter of 1939" be more appropriate?
 Reworded: Been a bit more specific about start date although the source added is entitled The Severe Winter of 1939–40
Is there a source for the final table?
Not a contemporary one which is what I have been looking for.  I have a modern one from this page which is a normally reliable amateur source. The latest contemporary table I have located in a really reliable source is 14 May 1940 in The Guardian [1] by which date some teams had one game left to play so the table can also be reconstructed from that with the remaining results added in. Per WP:CALC I don't think the table is OR as the various sources can be attributed i.e. the last printed version plus the references to the remaining results and the numbers of outstanding games are such that it's routine calculation. The omission from contemporary newspapers such as the Yorkshire Post, Hull Daily Mail etc I think is entirely understandable, we are talking about the weeks immediately following the invasion of France so newspapers were far more concentrating on war news and as the text says the season sort of fizzled out.  The Play-off Final was played and nobody really seemed to care about 2 or 3 unplayed games which is understandable in context of the threat of invasion.


### Championship play-off
Link two leg play-off to Two-legged tie.
 Done


### Representative matches
The England and Wales national sides are unlinked in the first paragraph but then linked in the second. I would move the links to the first mention, per MOS:DUPLINK.
 Done


### References
All references are behind a paywall that I can't access but they are all impeccably formatted, so no real concerns there.
Overall, very little I can find to be concerned about. The subject matter is dealt with in impressive detail and is very well presented. Placed on hold for minor issues listed above. Kosack (talk) 08:22, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

All addressed, thanks for taking on the review. Nthep (talk) 15:38, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
No worries, a nice article to review. Well written, suitably sourced and an informative read. This comfortably meets the relevant GA criteria and all of the issues raised above have been addressed. Promoting. Kosack (talk) 18:45, 26 September 2018 (UTC)