# Talk:African Auxiliary Pioneer Corps

Cheeky little ce, blammed a few typos, tidied prose, added oclc or issn to references, auto ed etc. Nice piece of work.Keith-264 (talk) 11:38, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:African Auxiliary Pioneer Corps/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Hog Farm (talk · contribs) 18:36, 26 May 2020 (UTC)


### Criteria
1. Prose  Pass
2. Verifiability  Pass
3. Depth of Coverage  Pass
4. Neutral  Pass
5. Stable  Pass
6. Illustrations  Pass
7. Miscellaneous  Pass


### Comments
1. 

"was a unit of the British army" - Should British Army be capitalized?
Y

"Allied war effort" - link Allied to Allies of World War II
Y

You link shillings, but not pence.  Is there a specific reason for this?
Y

"Building railroads from Beirut to Haifa, tunneling, loading ammunition onto trains, guarding supplies and working as cooks." - Sentence fragment
Y

"5 APC servicemen were killed" - MOS:NUMERALS
Y

"2 MBEs, 7 Military Medals, 8 British Empire Medals" - MOS:NUMERALS
Y

Lead could use a little expansion.
Lede expanded.--Catlemur (talk) 22:11, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
2.
3. 
4.
5.
6.

Is photography really the best way to describe the paintings of the AAPC activities?  Looks like they'd be licensed public domain as a painting, too, but it seems like a description of a painting would be better than a description of a photograph.
Added "A painting of" to the description of paintings within the article. Would that suffice?--Catlemur (talk) 21:54, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
@Catlemur: - Sorry, I wasn't very clear.  I was referring to the licensing information on Commons. Hog Farm (talk) 02:49, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
@Hog Farm: I removed all the paintings, perhaps I will sort the licensing some other day.--Catlemur (talk) 07:35, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
7.
Good work.  Placing on hold. Hog Farm (talk) 21:28, 26 May 2020 (UTC)