# Talk:2021–2022 Columbia University strike

This review is transcluded from Talk:2021 Columbia University strike/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: GhostRiver (talk · contribs) 21:18, 13 September 2021 (UTC)

I will be reviewing this within the next couple of days! — GhostRiver 21:18, 13 September 2021 (UTC)


### Infobox and lede
Specify in the first sentence that it was a labor strike among graduate students at Columbia
Done.
"disagreements between the two entities has" → "disagreements between the two entities have"
Done.
"Additional issues included" the rest of the paragraph is in present tense; have these additional issues been resolved?
Rephrased to present tense.


### Background
#### Unionization at Columbia
WL first instance of labor union in the body
Done.


#### Contract negotiations
Delink teaching assistants, already linked above
Done.
"a one year extension for PhD students" → "a one-year funding extension for doctoral candidates whose research had been interrupted by pandemic shutdowns" (I know there is a difference between simple doctoral and PhD, but this has been the crux of the issue in a lot of higher ed COVID disputes, and I believe it is supported by the source)
Done.
Delink coffee and doughnuts per MOS:OVERLINK
Done.


### Course of the strike
"including the class of 2024 class president" → "including the president of the Class of 2024"
Done.
"the Spectator was claiming that" → "the Spectator reported that" per MOS:DOUBT
Done.
"an op-ed in Technician" → "an op-ed in the Technician" (I know it's technically incorrect, but it flows better)
Done.
"the 7 bargaining unit members" → "the seven bargaining unit members" per MOS:NUMBERS
Done.
"The remaining 3 members" → "The remaining three members" per [{MOS:NUMBERS]]
Done.


### Aftermath
Good


### References
Good


### General comments
All photos are properly licensed and are relevant to the article
No stability concerns present in the revision history
Earwig score looks good at 22.5%, the highest due to an attributed direct quote
Putting on hold to address comments, all minor things. Ping me if there are any questions. — GhostRiver 12:40, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

GhostRiver, just pinging to let you know that I've made some changes to the article to address your comments here. Thanks again for starting this review, and if there are any further questions, comments, or concerns, please reach out. -JJonahJackalope (talk) 12:49, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
Looks all good now, happy to pass! — GhostRiver 13:05, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

Carlina Rivera photo.jpg
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 03:07, 8 August 2022 (UTC)

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Carlina Rivera photo.jpg
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 08:52, 8 August 2022 (UTC)