# Talk:Arizona State Route 347

This review is transcluded from Talk:Arizona State Route 347/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Racepacket (talk) 03:29, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Thank you for nominating this article.  No disamb. links or invalid external links.
Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality: 
"where the a farm appears" - delete "the"
 Done. --PCB 04:16, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
"about 33,000 vehicles used the route on an average day." - can you say at what point on the route?
 Done --PCB 04:29, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists: 

Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources: 

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary: 

C. No original research: 

Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects: 

What about adding Harrah's casino to the route description?
What evidence do you have of this? Harrah's casino seems to be in San Diego. --PCB 04:16, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
 Done --PCB 04:29, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
Official website and map shows address as 15406 Maricopa Road, Maricopa, AZ 85239.
Please add to the route description the at grade rail crossing just before W Maricopia Casa Grande Hwy.
Where? Can you give me a source? --PCB 04:16, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
Ref #3.
 Done --PCB 04:29, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
B. Focused: 

Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias: 

Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc: 
No edit wars.
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales: 

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions: 

Overall:
Pass or Fail: 
This article represents significant work by its author. Putting review on hold for you to address concerns. Racepacket (talk) 04:09, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
Thank you. I believe I have fixed all errors. --PCB 04:31, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
Thank you for your quick responses.  One final point and we are done — why does the lead paragraph say 40,000 vehicles per day, but the highest total in the body of the article is only 33,000 vehicles? Thanks! Racepacket (talk) 04:32, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

I want the lead to be less specific. In addition, the AADT is higher elsewhere. --PCB 04:35, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
Thank you for the explanation and congratulations on another Good Article. Racepacket (talk) 04:43, 10 March 2011 (UTC)