# Talk:Admirável Chip Novo

This review is transcluded from Talk:Admirável Chip Novo/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: Cathodography (talk · contribs) 19:48, 21 March 2025 (UTC)
Reviewer: Ieslie (talk · contribs) 17:58, 19 April 2025 (UTC)

Hi! I reviewed a previous article you submitted (Tribalistas (2002 album)) and it was very good. :) I'll review this one, since you have nominated many articles. Hopefully it doesn't take too long!
Background and production: Looks good. The extra passage on the left makes the background easier to receive when readers stumble upon a music article. Good amounts of citations as well.
Title and cover: Good separation of paragraphs, but could use a few more citations, especially in the second paragraph. Find some other sources that can verify claims made, or re-use previous citations that can verify the statements made. Overall, pretty good! :)
Musical style: Overall, looks good. No issues with grammar, enough use of citations, and good layout.
Reception (Critical/Accolades/Commercial performance): Everything looks good (good layout, enough uses of citations, seperation of paragraphs). However, this sentences is a little contradictory. "Admirável Chip Novo received mostly mixed reviews from music critics." In the top of the page (the summary), it states that the album received positive reviews, meanwhile here it says it received mixed reviews. Either change the top to "mixed reviews", or rewrite both statements with, "The album received positive to mixed reviews". Everything looks solid so far though! :)
Promotion (Singles/Appearances): No issues here.
Legacy and impact: Commendable use of sources. Everything is evenly laid out as well. 
Overall Pass/Fail: Pass! The article could use some extra citations for some claims made, but overall, its good! I'll promote it to GA!