# Talk:Architecture of Scotland in the prehistoric era

This review is transcluded from Talk:Architecture of Scotland in the Prehistoric era/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Dr. Blofeld (talk · contribs) 17:48, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

"As wood was a much more commonly available material in this region, these were often linked to timber monuments of which only remnants remain." can you reword? "often linked" seems a bit odd in this context.
 Done It was a bit confusing and dealt with better in the next few sentences, so I just removed it.--SabreBD (talk) 10:23, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
"There are at least 100 broch sites in Scotland." Some examples?
 Done--SabreBD (talk) 10:23, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
"There is evidence for about 1,000 Iron Age hillforts in Scotland, most located below the Clyde-Forth line". -Some of the most notable examples?
 Done--SabreBD (talk) 10:23, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:48, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality: 
B. MoS compliance: 
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources: 
B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary: 
C. No original research: 
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects: 
B. Focused: 
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias: 
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc: 
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales: 
B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions: 
Overall:
Pass or Fail: 
Good job.♦ Dr. Blofeld 20:11, 26 October 2013 (UTC)

An excellent article as always! One query - should the title be Prehistoric or prehistoric? Currently the text uses lowercase, the title uppercase. Andrew Gray (talk) 13:38, 26 October 2013 (UTC)

Its a fair point. To be honest I followed the trend of capitalising Medieval and other recognised periods. However, I note that prehistoric is not capitalised on a number of Wikipedia articles. I will take another look at the guidelines.--SabreBD (talk) 17:02, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
Many of the others seem to have both capitalised (eg Early Modern Era), which might be why Prehistoric seems odd? Andrew Gray (talk) 19:01, 26 October 2013 (UTC)