# Talk:Arihant-class submarine

I recently uploaded an image of Arihant. If anyone has doubts regarding the clarity of the image, please refer to this section of the talk page of INS Arihant.—VaibhavafroTalk 04:32, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

The aforementioned discussion can now be found here. — Vaibhavafro 💬 07:18, 16 December 2022 (UTC)

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Arihant-class submarine's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "tnie":
From Weapon systems of the Indian Navy: "DRDO on long range Pralay, K5 to stalemate China soon". The New Indian Express. 15 December 2018. Archived from the original on 3 April 2019. Retrieved 2019-10-22.
From K-5 (ballistic missile): "DRDO on long range Pralay, K5 to stalemate China soon". The New Indian Express. 15 December 2018. Archived from the original on 3 April 2019. Retrieved 2019-10-22.

Reference named "IndiaToday2017":
From S5-class submarine: Unnithan, Sandeep (10 December 2017). "A peek into India's top secret and costliest defence project, nuclear submarines". India Today. Archived from the original on 20 April 2019. Retrieved 5 September 2019.
From K-5 (ballistic missile): Unnithan, Sandeep (December 10, 2017). "A peek into India's top secret and costliest defence project, nuclear submarines". India Today. Archived from the original on 20 April 2019. Retrieved 22 October 2019.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 13:58, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

@N Jeevan: could you please fill in the above refs, or indicate at least if the bot guessed correctly? -- Fyrael (talk) 19:52, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

This is too much irrelevant to keep the dead links as apart of the article . They often fail the verification and gives no benefit.They also lack the required or current information .  They should removed and replaced by the new ones.  I ame Shears (talk) 06:25, 8 July 2021 (UTC)

This article ought to mention russian help.
https://www.google.co.in/books/edition/Managing_India_s_Nuclear_Forces/5yNC-nWHqAQC?hl=en&gbpv=1&pg=PA135&printsec=frontcover&dq=INS%20Arihant DataCrusade1999 (talk) 11:14, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

this article also mentions "extensive russian help"
https://www.economist.com/asia/2022/08/11/the-nuclear-arsenals-of-china-india-and-pakistan-are-growing DataCrusade1999 (talk) 11:35, 7 January 2025 (UTC)