# Talk:2007 Scottish Challenge Cup final

This review is transcluded from Talk:2007 Scottish Challenge Cup Final/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: The Rambling Man (talk · contribs) 17:01, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
Comments

"and St. Johnstone on 25 November " think this needs a "held" before the on, or similar.
changed to "and St. Johnstone, held on 25 November..."
"The match was Dunfermline's second appearance..." by this point I think we would need to reiterate which match you're talking about.
Changed to "The 2007 final was Dunfermline's second appearance..." to make clear which match it is referring to.
" lost in 1996" avoid that Easter egg (particularly when you have "in 1990" unlinked in the previous para).
Unlinked the "1996" article, as requested above.
"St. Johnstone took a 3-goal..." -> "St. Johnstone took a 3–0 lead within the first 30 minutes with a penalty from... and goals from ... and ..."?
Incorporated the requested improvement into the article.
"With 20 minutes left to play in the second half, Stephen Glass scored a penalty for Dunfermline to make it 3–2 which is how the scoreline remained until the end, with St. Johnstone winning its first national cup trophy in its 123-year history." would be good to split this, and avoid the "which is how..." which isn't great prose.
Reworded to "In the 70th minute, Stephen Glass scored the final goal of the game for Dunfermline from a penalty to make it 3–2. St. Johnstone's victory was the first time the club had won a national cup trophy in its 123-year history."
"The competition is a ..." surely "was" as there's no way of telling what may happen to the competition now and in the future.
Corrected to "was".
"last season's" previous season's.
Changed, as requested.
" at Excelsior Stadium.[4] " wouldn't we normally say "at the Excelsior Stadium"?
I believe both may be acceptable but have changed to include "the" anyway.
"before Stephen Glass scored" don't think you need to repeat his first name.
I'm unsure as to what you mean here. His first name is only mentioned in the lead and once again near the end of the article in the match report section.
Generally, in most prose I've read, once you've mentioned someone's first name, you don't need to do it again unless their surname is ambiguous.  I'm referring to WP:SURNAME, while it's for bios, I tend to apply it to most articles.  The Rambling Man (talk) 19:53, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
Fair point. I've removed the mention of his surname where requested. Cal Umbra 20:39, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
Route to the final and the first para of Analysis seem to be pretty similar in coverage, are both needed?
I have mentioned it briefly in the "Analysis" section only as a comparison of the matches played by both teams. Generally teams have an advantage with home games and both clubs only played one home game each.
"Dunfermline scored a goal when" I don't think "a goal" is necessary, there's only one way to score in this game.
Removed "a goal".
You hyphenate semi-final but not mishitting.  Seems odd to me!
Does look rather odd now you mention it although with a hyphen it comes up as a spelling mistake! I've added a hyphen anyway.
"which he confirmed later" -> "later confirmed"
Changed.
A lot of double full stops in the references.
I believe they are necessary as they are all preceded by "F.C." which is an abbreviation, which should be then followed by a full stop.
No, I don't think double full stops are appropriate, per MOS:CONSECUTIVE.  The Rambling Man (talk) 19:53, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
Right enough. I stand corrected. Cal Umbra 20:39, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
I'll put it on hold for a week and give it another look over then.  The Rambling Man (talk) 17:37, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the review. I've seen to the points you've mentioned. Some may require further discussion. Cal Umbra 19:45, 28 August 2013 (UTC)