# Talk:Bellingham Square station

This review is transcluded from Talk:Bellingham Square station/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Eviolite (talk · contribs) 02:51, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
I'll review this article within the week. eviolite (talk) 02:51, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, spelling, and grammar):  b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): 

It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):  d (copyvio and plagiarism): 

It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 

It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: 

It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: 

It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 

Overall:
Pass/Fail: 

Sourcing, images good
For the lead, add a qualifier like "the newly constructed" before Chelsea station in the last sentence, for clarity
 Done
Unless I'm missing something, "Washington Street" should be "Washington Avenue" in all mentions (including in history)
 Done
"The remaining commuter rail platform is located on the north side of the two tracks, with a metal shelter. The station is accessible for Silver Line buses but not commuter rail." - since commuter rail no longer stops at the station I would clarify with something like "disused" (and I don't know if accessibility for the rail platforms are necessary for the same reason)
 Done Updated the wording.
I'm a bit confused, can't see where on the map it suggests that Route 111 runs on Broadway (it looks to be a different road from 116/117)
 Done
Link Revere, Massachusetts and main line (railway)
 Done
Per Wikipedia:Using maps and similar sources in Wikipedia articles#Original research, "in the 1880s or 1890s." should probably be "by the 1890s".
 Done
Not sure why there's an ellipsis after "Danvers River drawbridge"
 Done It was my addition, but I have no idea why. Perhaps a stray kitty paw.
There's a mention of "right of way" before the link - should move the link up (and change it to use "right-of-way" for consistency)
 Done
@Pi.1415926535: putting on hold. eviolite (talk) 16:37, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

@Eviolite: Thanks for the review! I've implemented all your recommendations. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 23:46, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
Thanks. Happy to promote now, another fine piece of work. eviolite (talk) 02:53, 19 January 2022 (UTC)