# Talk:1997 Women's Cricket World Cup final

This review is transcluded from Talk:1997 Women's Cricket World Cup Final/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Kosack (talk · contribs) 09:12, 13 August 2020 (UTC)

I'll take this one on, will post review as soon as possible. Kosack (talk) 09:12, 13 August 2020 (UTC)


### Lead
Might be worth linking wickets here for the uninitiated.
Links for the Indian and English teams in the second paragraph?
Linked both. Harrias talk 13:29, 14 August 2020 (UTC)


### Background
You use both eleven and 12 in successive sections here.
Changed both to words. Harrias talk 13:29, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
Worth mentioning that England were the reigning holders?
Added. Harrias talk 13:29, 14 August 2020 (UTC)


### Australia
Would the Ireland match have been counted in the final table standings? If so, would be worth explaining how they awarded points for it.
Have added a little, let me know if you think more is needed (in which case, I would need to explain the whole scoring system.) Harrias talk 13:29, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
Worth linking wickets and One Day International again here.
Linked. Harrias talk 13:29, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
"Australia scored 123 for seven led scores of 33 and 31", led by?
Oops, added. Harrias talk 13:29, 14 August 2020 (UTC)


### New Zealand
"uneven number of teams, only featured four other teams", a little repetitive with the double use of teams perhaps.
Changed the second to "sides". Harrias talk 13:29, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
Worth linking umpires perhaps?
Linked. Harrias talk 13:29, 14 August 2020 (UTC)


### Summary
In the lead, you have no link for Calcutta but include one here. I'd either have both linked or neither.
Removed. Harrias talk 13:29, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
Emily Drumm is linked here but there is a Drumm mentioned in their route to the final section. I'm assuming it's the same one so the link needs moving up.
Sorted. Harrias talk 13:29, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
Along similar lines, you drop the first name for Fitzpatrick, but include the first name for Hockley (and Drumm if the above point is agreed) in the same sentence.
Tidied. Harrias talk 13:29, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
Note b is a little oddly placed as it seems to be describing the scoring method, but at this point it's halfway through the article and there are frequent uses of it prior.
Moved to the first use. Harrias talk 13:29, 14 August 2020 (UTC)


### References
Ref 13 could do with an accessdate.
Added. Harrias talk 13:29, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
In all honesty, I could probably pass this now and have no complaints as it's a very well-written piece. A couple of minor suggestions and adjustments above that could be looked at though, so placed on hold for now. Kosack (talk) 08:43, 14 August 2020 (UTC)

@Kosack: Many thanks for the review. I have responded to each point above. Harrias talk 13:29, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
I'm happy with all of the responses to the queries above, nice work. Happy to promote. Kosack (talk) 13:53, 14 August 2020 (UTC)