# Talk:1939 Pacific typhoon season

Shouldn't the text in the lede be changed to reflect the fact that the JTWC and PAGASA did not exist in 1939? Removing this would leave it fairly empty, and I'm not sure what it should be replaced with. Aside from that, this seems to be pretty close to B-class. --Coredesat 06:22, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

Whoops, that was stupid. OK, I added the correct details. Hurricanehink (talk) 15:28, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
Looks better now, I've upped it to B-class unless there are any other concerns. --Coredesat 18:39, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

Well written: Its hink, it always passes.
Images: Pass
Broad: Pass
NPOV: Obvious Pass
Refs: Pass
Accurate: Pass
Well done. Surprised information gets this far back.Mitchazenia 20:25, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

As part of the WikiProject Good Articles, we're doing sweeps to go over all of the current GAs and see if they still meet the GA criteria. I'm specifically going over all of the "Meteorology and atmospheric sciences" articles. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. I have made several minor corrections throughout the article. Altogether the article is well-written and is still in great shape after its passing in 2007. Continue to improve the article making sure all new information is properly sourced and neutral. It would also be beneficial to go through the article and update all of the access dates of the inline citations and fix any dead links. If you have any questions, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. I have updated the article history to reflect this review. Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 04:51, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

We need a season summary article to keep it in line with the other tropical cyclone season articles, especially the 1982 Pacific typhoon season article which has reached GA.  Thegreatdr (talk) 17:53, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

I don't think it's needed. We agreed on either 1851 or 1852 AHS talk page that season summaries weren't really needed, if there wasn't much information for the season. However, I did add a bit of summarization to the lede. ♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 02:45, 11 November 2008 (UTC)

1. From the track map of Typhoon 21, I can't see how it affect Taiwan...?
2. Typhoon Four first observed as depression to the east of Okinawa, then how can the track map start from a more southern position and how can it affect the Philippines?
C933103 (talk) 09:32, 1 May 2014 (UTC)

I wonder are the storm track maps are matched up to the sections? I believe @Supportstorm: may have taken the data for the track maps from a different place then the original authors of this article.Jason Rees (talk) 22:58, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
The data I used came from IBTrACS data set td9636. So, no, it's not the same author that most of the article is written in, however is a (generally) close match. If you need more information on this data set and sources used you can read the description pdf file that came with it here. Supportstorm (talk) 11:13, 2 May 2014 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on 1939 Pacific typhoon season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/5v6pTB3S4?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.typhoon2000.ph%2Fgaryp_mgtcs%2Fmay03sum.txt to http://www.typhoon2000.ph/garyp_mgtcs/may03sum.txt
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:06, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

[1] Here's the MWR if needed. - HurricaneSpin  (Talk) 17:55, 11 August 2017 (UTC)