# Talk:Bertram Fletcher Robinson

Since someone chose--without giving a reason--to revert my edit about Robinson's editorship of the Gentleman's Magazine, I quote here from the January 1907 issue (p 195), under the heading "Sylvanus Urban's Notebook":
"Since notes under this heading were last written, the death has been recorded of the Editor of the GENTLEMAN'S MAGAZINE. Mr Fletcher Robinson had held the appointment only a few weeks; indeed, the January number was the first which should have shown his handiwork."
86.171.173.91 (talk) 16:50, 29 August 2011 (UTC)

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Bertram Fletcher Robinson/CommentsTalk:Bertram Fletcher Robinson/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
Last edited at 16:33, 24 July 2009 (UTC).
Substituted at 09:31, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
I have been working on he content and flow of this article for some weeks now. It was rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale 14 years ago. Please could I request a reassessment and advice about how to improve the item further to A-Class? Thank you  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.38.214.91 (talk) 20:53, 8 September 2023 (UTC) 

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Bertram Fletcher Robinson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110714184315/http://sherlockholmes.ning.com/photo/photo/show?id=903618:Photo:14502 to http://sherlockholmes.ning.com/photo/photo/show?id=903618%3APhoto%3A14502
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:00, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
I have been working on he content and flow of this article for some weeks now.  It was rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale 14 years ago.  Please could I request a reassessment and advice about how to improve the item further to A-Class? Thank you.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.38.214.91 (talk) 16:20, 8 September 2023 (UTC) 

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 6 external links on Bertram Fletcher Robinson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090831234643/http://www.bfronline.biz/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=70&Itemid=9 to http://www.bfronline.biz/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=70&Itemid=9
Corrected formatting/usage for http://sherlockholmes.ning.com/photo/photo/show?id=903618%3APhoto%3A14502
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100316104007/http://www.bfronline.biz/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=55&Itemid=9 to http://www.bfronline.biz/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=55&Itemid=9
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090625171723/http://www.bfronline.biz/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=123&Itemid=9 to http://www.bfronline.biz/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=123&Itemid=9
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080509134344/http://www.bfronline.biz/ to http://www.bfronline.biz/
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130724142459/http://bfronline.info/images/pdf/bfr_chronology.pdf to http://bfronline.info/images/pdf/bfr_chronology.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:21, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

82.38.214.91 (talk) 11:57, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Bertram Fletcher Robinson/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Ktkvtsh (talk · contribs) 07:38, 19 February 2024 (UTC)

I, Ktkvtsh, will assess the "Bertram Fletcher Robinson" article for potential Good Article status on Wikipedia. Ktkvtsh (talk) 07:39, 19 February 2024 (UTC)


### GA review
Last updated: 01:06, 9 August 2025 (UTC) by Community Tech bot 
See what the criteria are and what they are not
1) Well-written

 1a) the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct
 1b) it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation
2) Verifiable with no original research

 2a) it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline
 2b) reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose)
 2c) it contains no original research
 2d) it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism
3) Broad in its coverage

 3a) it addresses the main aspects of the topic
 3b) it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style)
4) Neutral:

 4) Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each
5) Stable:

 5) Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute
6) Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio

 6a) media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content
 6b) media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions
Overall:  


#### Comments:
After a thorough assessment of Bertram Fletcher Robinson, I can affirm that it successfully meets the criteria for Good Article status on Wikipedia. The article is well-written, with prose that is clear, concise, and accessible to a broad audience, adhering to the Manual of Style guidelines in all respects, including the lead section, layout, and incorporation of lists. It is verifiable, with all references correctly presented and reliable sources cited inline for any content that could be reasonably challenged. There is no evidence of original research, copyright violations, or plagiarism. The article is broad in its coverage, addressing the main aspects of the topic while maintaining focus and avoiding unnecessary detail. It represents viewpoints neutrally, without editorial bias, and remains stable, not subject to ongoing edit wars or content disputes. Furthermore, it is appropriately illustrated with media that are tagged with their copyright statuses and have relevant captions, enhancing the reader's understanding of the subject.

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Armchair Detective Vol. 26 1993.jpg
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 01:06, 9 August 2025 (UTC)