# Talk:Battle on Snowshoes (1757)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Battle on Snowshoes (1757)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Hi there, I am happy to tell you that this article has passed GA without the need for any further improvement. Listed below is information on how the article fared against the Wikipedia:good article criteria, with suggestions for future development. These are not required to achieve GA standard, but they might help in future A-class or FAC review process.

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose):  b (MoS): 
Again, prose is about a 6/10. Its readable, but not particularly fluid and would need some revision before attempting FAC.
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):  b (focused): 
One question that springs to mind is whether there was and backlash or criticism of Rodger's for murdering his prisoners: if they were "Indians" then I'd assume not, but if they were French then I'd expect there to be some form of protest.
They were probably Frenchmen (since it was a supply run, not something I would think Indians to have done).  I don't recall seeing anything about protests concerning those sorts of killings; it may even have been somewhat typical of this sort of irregular frontier warfare.
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
a (fair representation):  b (all significant views): 
It is stable.

It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
a (tagged and captioned):  b (lack of images does not in itself exclude GA):  c (non-free images have fair use rationales): 
Overall:
a Pass/Fail: 
Thankyou and congratulations, an excellent addition to Wikipedia:Good Articles. All the best.--Jackyd101 (talk) 20:19, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

Thanks! Magic♪piano 21:58, 12 June 2009 (UTC)