C: and we w we we will play around with all of them
C: but the principal distinction between having the the pure schema and their instantiations on the one hand , and adding some whatever , more intention oriented specification um on parallel to that that this approach seems to be uh workable to me .
C: I don't know .
C: If you all share that opinion then that made my day much happier .
G: Uh yeah wait B: This is a simple way to basically link uh roles to actions .
G: R Yeah , yeah . That 's fine .
E: Sure .
B: That 's the that was the intent of of it , basically .
G: Uh that 's true .
E: Sure .
G: Although um roles C: Yeah .
B: So I I do I 'm I 'm not G: Yeah I I C: I 'm I 'm never happy when he uses the word " roles " ,
G: Yeah .
G: I was going to C: I 'm B: I b I mean ROLLS
B: so
G: Bread rolls ?
E: Oh you meant pastries , then ?
B: Yeah , pastries is what I 'm talking about .
G: Pastry
G: oh ba oh the bak bakery example .
D: Bakery .
E: This is the bakery example .
D: Bakery .
G: I see .
E: Got it . Alright .
G: Right . OK .
E: Help !
G: I guess I 'll agree to that , then .
C: OK .
C: That 's all I have for today .
C: Oh no ,
C: there 's one more issue .
C: Bhaskara brought that one up .
C: Meeting time rescheduling .
G: I n Didn't you say something about Friday ,
G: or ?
C: Yeah .
G: Hmm .
C: So it looks like
C: you have not been partaking ,
C: the Monday at three o ' clock time has turned out to be not good anymore .
C: So people have been thinking about an alternative time
C: and the one we came up with is Friday two - thirty ?
C: three ?
C: What was it ?
B: You have class until two ,
B: right ?
B: so if we don't want him if we don't want him to run over here
F: Mm - hmm .
C: Two - th Two - thirty - ish or three or Friday at three or something around that time .
G: So do I .
G: Yeah .
E: Mm - hmm .
B: two thirty - ish or three is F: Yeah .
F: Yeah .
F: e
C: Um how how are your G: That would be good .
A: uh Friday
A: uh Yeah , that 's fine .
E: Uh C: And I know that you have until three You 're busy ?
D: Yeah .
G: So three is sounds good ?
A: Yeah .
E: Yeah .
G: I 'll be free by then .
E: I could do that .
E: Yeah I mean earlier on Friday is better but three you know I mean if it were a three or a three thirty time then I would take the three or whatever ,
C: Mm - hmm .
E: but yeah sure three is fine .
C: Yeah ,
C: and you can always make it shortly after three probably .
E: I mean .
D: Yeah , and I don't need to be here particularly deeply .
C: Often ,
C: no , but uh ,
D: Yeah .
C: whenever .
D: But yeah .
C: You are more than welcome if you think that this kind of discussion gets you anywhere in in your life then uh you 're free to c
D: It 's fascinating .
G: " That 's the right answer . "
D: I 'm just glad that I don't have to work it out
D: because .
E: Yeah .
C: Hmm ?
D: I 'm just glad that don't have to work it out myself ,
D: that I 'm not involved at all in the working out of it
D: because .
E: Yeah .
C: Uh but you 're a linguist .
C: You should D: Oh yeah . That 's why I 'm glad that I 'm not involved in working it out .
C: OK .
A: So it 's at Friday at three ?
A: there that 's
C: And um
E: So already again this week ,
E: huh ?
C: How diligent do we feel ?
C: Yeah .
C: Do feel that we have done our chores for this week
C: or F: Yeah .
F: So I mean clearly there 's I can talk about the um the parser changes on Friday at least ,
C: OK , Bhaskara will do the big show on Friday .
F: so .
G: And you guys will argue some more ?
E: Yeah . Between now and then .
B: And between now and then yeah .
G: and have some ?
G: probably .
E: Promise ?
C: We will r
A: Yeah .
B: We will .
B: Don't worry .
G: Yeah .
G: And we 'll get the summary
A: Yeah .
G: like , this the c you know , short version ,
G: like A: An - and I would like to second Keith 's request .
G: S
A: An example wo would be nice
C: Yes .
E: Yeah .
A: t to have kind of a detailed example .
C: Yes . I 've I 've I 've I guess I 'm on record for promising that now .