B: People won't want to enter it .
C: Pe - people don't wanna enter them .
C: And , if it 's not obvious , you may want to actually uh , point out to people that it 's closed you know , what they 're g going to is closed and they don't have the option of entering it .
B: s b
C: So another thing that can come up , and will come up as soon as you get serious about this is , that another option of course is to have a more of a dialogue .
C: So if someone says something you could ask them .
E: Yeah .
C: OK .
C: And Now , one thing you could do is always ask them ,
C: but that 's boring .
C: And it also w it also be a pain for the person using it .
C: So one thing you could do is build a little system that , said , " whenever you got a question like that I 've got one of three answers .
C: Ask them which one you want . "
C: OK .
C: But that 's , um , not what we 're gonna do .
B: But maybe that 's a false state of the system , that it 's too close to call .
C: Oh yeah .
C: You want the you want the ability to a You want the ability to ask ,
C: but what you don't wanna do is onl build a system that always asks every time ,
C: and i
C: That 's not getting at the scientific problem ,
C: and it 's B: Mm - hmm .
C: In general you 're you know , it 's gonna be much more complex than that .
C: a This is purposely a really simple case .
B: Yeah .
C: So , uh C: Yeah .
B: I have one more point to to Bhaskara 's question .
B: Um , I think also the the the deep understanding part of it is is going to be in there to the extent that we um , want it in terms of our modeling .
B: We can start , you know , basic from human beings ,
B: model that ,
B: its motions ,
B: going , walking , seeing ,
B: we can mem model all of that
B: and then compose whatever inferences o we make out of these really conceptual primitives .
B: That will be extremely deep in the in in in my understanding .
C: Yeah . S so so the way that might come up , if you wanna Suppose you wanted to do that , you might say , " Um , as an intermediate step in your belief - net , is there a Source - Path - Goal schema involved ? "
C: OK ?
C: And if so , uh , is there a focus on the goal ?
C: Or is there a focus on the path ?
C: or something .
C: And that could be , uh , one of the conditiona
C: you know , th the In some piece of the belief - net , that could be the the appropriate thing to enter .
F: So , where would we extract that information from ?
F: From the M - three - L ?
C: No .
C: No . See , the M - three - L is not gonna give th
C: What he was saying is , the M - three - L does not have any of that .
C: All it has is some really crude stuff saying , " A person wants to go to a place . "
F: Right .
E: The M - three - L is the old SmartKom output ?
C: Right .
E: OK .
C: M - three well , M - three - L itself refers to Multimedia Mark - up Language .
E: It 's just a language .
E: Right , yeah .
C: So we have th w we we we have to have a better w way of referring to B: The parser output ?
C: Mm - hmm .
C: Yeah .
B: " Analyzed speech " I think it 's what they call it ,
C: The C: Well , OK .
B: really , oder C: Yeah .
B: o th No , actually , intention lattices is what we 're gonna get .
C: Is - i but they c they call it intention lattice ,
C: but tha
B: In - in a intention lattice k Hypothesis .
C: Anyway .
B: They call it intention hypotheses .
C: Right .
C: So , th they 're gonna give us some cr uh or We can assume that y you get this crude information .
C: About intention ,
C: and that 's all they 're going to provide .
C: And they don't give you the kind of object ,
C: they don't give you any discourse history ,
C: if you want to keep that you have to keep it somewhere else .
B: Well , they keep it .
B: We have to request it .
C: Right .
B: Nuh ?
B: But it 's not in there .
C: Well , they they kee they keep it by their lights .
C: It may it may or may not be what what we want .
B: Hmm .
B: Yeah , or i
C: Yeah .
E: So , if someone says , " I wanna touch the side of the Powder - Tower " , that would basically , we need to pop up Tango mode and the and the directions ?
C: If i if Yeah , if it got as simple as that , yeah .
E: Yeah .
C: But it wouldn't .
E: OK .
E: But that doesn't necessarily E: But we 'd have to infer a Source - Path - Goal to some degree for touching the side , right ?
B: Well Uh , th the there is a p a point there if I understand you . Correct ?
B: Um ,
B: because um , sometimes people just say things B: This you find very often .
B: " Where is the city hall ? "