PhD D: I thought you are OK . Alright . Mm - hmm .
Professor B: I think I have a pretty good idea
PhD D: OK .
Professor B: but but um Uh , and then the next day uh , late in the day I 'll be having that that discussion with her .
PhD D: Mmm .
Professor B: Um . So .
PhD D: Um Uh One thing I mean we   in past meetings we had um also a you know various variously talked about the um work that w uh was happening sort of on the on the recognition side
Professor B: Mm - hmm .
PhD D: um but isn't necessarily related to meetings uh specifically . So . Um . And I wondered whether we should maybe have um a separate meeting and between you know , whoever 's interested in that because I feel that uh there 's plenty of stuff to talk about but it would be sort of um maybe the wrong place to do it in this meeting if uh Professor B: Think so ?
PhD D: Well , it 's that It 's just gonna be ver very boring for people who are not you know , sort of really interested in the details of the recognition system .
Grad A: I 'm interested .
Professor B: Well , OK , so how many how many people here would not be interested in uh in a meeting about recognition ?
PhD C: Me too .
PhD F: Jane may not be .
Grad A: Jane , I think .
PhD C: Yep .
PhD D: Well I know Well , Jane an Well you mean in a separate meeting or ha ha talking about it in this Grad A: No . If we talked about it in this meeting .
PhD F: He 's wondering how much overlap there will be .
Professor B: Yeah , so you 're su
PhD D: OK .
Professor B: So .
PhD D: So , uh , uh , Liz and Jane probably .
Professor B: OK , so we 're gonna have a guy 's meeting .
PhD D: Uh . Uh , if you wanna put it that way .
PhD F: Good thing Liz isn't here .
Professor B: Real Grad E: Watch a ball game ?
Professor B: Yeah , real real real men " Real men do decoding " or something like that .
PhD F: Don't listen to this , Liz .
PhD D: Right .
Professor B: Uh .
PhD D: I mean it it 's sort of I mean when when the talk is about data collection stuff , sometimes I 've you know , I I 'm bored .
Professor B: Yeah .
Grad A: The Nod off ?
PhD D: So it 's I c I can sympathize with them not wanting to i to to be uh you know If I cou you know this could Professor B: It 's cuz y you have a So you need a better developed feminine side .
PhD D: I 'm
Professor B: There 's probably gonna be a lot of " bleeps " in this meeting .
PhD D: not sure I wanna Grad A: Yeah , I would as {comment} I would guess .
Professor B: Uh . Um .
PhD D: Yeah and Professor B: I think it must be uh nearing the end of the week . Um . Yeah . I You know , I I 've heard some comments about like this . That m could be .
PhD D: Mm - hmm .
Professor B: I mean the Um . U
PhD D: And we don't have to do it every week .
PhD F: Could we PhD D: We could do it every other week or so . You know , whatev or whenever we feel like we PhD F: Right , I was Why don't we alternate this meeting every other week ?
Grad A: Or just alternate the focus .
PhD F: Tha - That 's what I mean .
Grad A: Yeah , so on even weeks have basic on data .
Professor B: Yeah .
PhD D: We could do that , yeah .
PhD F: Yeah .
PhD D: I I Personally I 'd I 'm not in favor of more meetings . Um . Because , uh .
Professor B: Right .
Grad A: I am .
PhD D: You know .
Grad A: Oh sor
PhD F: But I do I don't I mean a lot of times lately it seems like we don't really have enough for a full meeting on Meeting Recorder .
PhD D: Right .
Grad A: Well , except that we keep going for our full time .
PhD F: So if we did that PhD C: Yep .
PhD F: Well , cuz we get into these other topics .
Grad A: Yeah .
PhD D: We feel We feel obligated to collect more data .
Grad E: Yeah .
Grad A: Ugh .
PhD F: Yeah .
Grad A: I don't .
PhD F: So if we could alternate the focus of the meeting Grad A: Let 's read digits and go .
Professor B: Why don't we just start with that .
PhD D: ummh . {comment} ummh . {comment} OK .
Professor B: And then if we find , you know we 're just not getting enough done , there 's all these topics not coming up , then we can expand into another meeting .
PhD D: Mm - hmm .
Professor B: But I I think that 's a great idea . Uh . So uh . Um . Let 's chat about it with Liz and Jane when we get a chance , see what they think and PhD D: Mm - hmm .
PhD F: Yeah that would be good . I mean Andreas and I have various talks in the halls
PhD D: Mm - hmm .
PhD F: and there 's lots of things , you know , details and stuff that would I think people 'd be interested in and I 'd you know , where do we go from here kind of things and So , it would be good .
Professor B: Yeah , and you 're you 're attending the uh the front - end meeting as well as the others so you have you have probably one of the best you and I , I guess are the main ones who sort of see the bridge between the two .
Grad A: Bridge .
PhD D: Mm - hmm .
Professor B: We are doing recognition in both of them . So .
PhD F: Mm - hmm .
PhD D: Right .
Professor B: Uh .
Grad A: OK ?
PhD D: So um . So so we could talk a little bit about that now if if there 's some time .
Grad A: No , no that would be for next week .
PhD D: Um I jus So the latest result was that um um yot I tested the uh the sort of final version of the PLP configuration um on development test data for for this year 's Hub - five test set .

Summary: The team thought that they should not have everyone attend meetings on specific topics. For general catchup meetings like this, they thought it would make sense to alternate every two weeks. The team joked around about having a guys meeting, as one of the groups would not have any female members. They were mainly concerned with collecting more data through their own meeting recordings. Though, many of the meetings they were having for that purpose were shorter than they would have liked.