Article 88 Imprest accounts
1. Imprest accounts may be set up for the payment of expenditure where, owing to the limited amounts involved, it is materially impossible or inefficient to carry out payment operations by budgetary procedures. Imprest accounts may also be set up for the collection of revenue other than own resources. In Union delegations, imprest accounts may also be used to execute payments of limited amounts by budgetary procedures, if such use is efficient and effective due to local requirements. The maximum amount which may be paid by the imprest administrator where it is materially impossible or inefficient to carry out payment operations by budgetary procedures shall be established by the accounting officer and shall in any case not exceed EUR 60 000 for each item of expenditure. However, in the field of crisis management aid and humanitarian aid operations, imprest accounts may be used without any limitation on the amount, while respecting the level of appropriations decided by the European Parliament and by the Council on the corresponding budget line for the current financial year and in accordance with the internal rules of the Commission. 2. In Union delegations, imprest accounts shall be set up for the payment of expenditure from both the sections of the budget relating to the Commission and to the EEAS, ensuring full traceability of expenditure.
Article 89 Creation and administration of imprest accounts
1. The creation of an imprest account and the appointment of an imprest administrator shall be the subject of a decision by the accounting officer of the Union institution, on the basis of a duly substantiated proposal from the authorising officer responsible. That decision shall set out the respective responsibilities and obligations of the imprest administrator and the authorising officer. Imprest administrators shall be chosen from officials or, should the need arise and only in duly substantiated cases, from other members of staff or in accordance with the conditions established in the internal rules of the Commission from personnel employed by the Commission in the field of crisis management aid and humanitarian aid operations provided that their employment contracts guarantee equivalent level of protection in terms of liability as applicable to staff pursuant to Article 95. Imprest administrators shall be chosen on the grounds of their knowledge, skills and particular qualifications as evidenced by diplomas or by appropriate professional experience, or after an appropriate training programme. 2. In proposals for decisions to create an imprest account, the authorising officer responsible shall ensure that: (a) priority is given to the use of budgetary procedures where there is access to the central computerised accounting system; (b) imprest accounts are used only in duly substantiated cases. In decisions to create an imprest account, the accounting officer shall specify the operating terms and the conditions for use of the imprest account. The amendment of the operating terms for an imprest account shall also be the subject of a decision by the accounting officer on a duly substantiated proposal from the authorising officer responsible. 3. Bank accounts for the imprest shall be opened and monitored by the accounting officer, who shall also authorise delegated signatures on them on the basis of a duly substantiated proposal from the authorising officer responsible. 4. Imprest accounts shall be endowed by the accounting officer of the Union institution and shall be placed under the responsibility of imprest administrators. 5. Payments made shall be followed by formal final validation decisions or payment orders signed by the authorising officer responsible. The imprest transactions shall be settled by the authorising officer by the end of the following month, so that the accounting balance and the bank balance can be reconciled. 6. The accounting officer shall carry out checks, or have them carried out by a staff member in his or her own department or in the authorising department specifically empowered for that purpose. Those checks shall as a general rule be effected on the spot and, where necessary, without warning, to verify the existence of the funds allocated to the imprest administrators and the bookkeeping and to check that imprest transactions are settled within the time limit set. The accounting officer shall communicate the findings of those checks to the authorising officer responsible.
Amendment rationale: CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL Reasons for and objectives of the proposal The Commission has been conducting borrowing and lending operations to provide financial assistance in the form of loans to a beneficiary country for several decades . The borrowing and lending operations are guaranteed under the Union’s budget and come under the wider scope of budgetary implementation. G eneral rules for such operations are laid down in Article 220 of Regulation ( EU, Euratom ) 2018/1046 1 (“Financial Regulation”) , which provides that the Commission can be empowered in a basic act to borrow on behalf of the Union or Euratom to on-lend the corresponding amounts to the beneficiary Member States or third countries under the conditions applicable to the borrowings. The cash flows between the borrowed funds and the loans are matched one-to-one. This means that market operations are based on disbursement needs, which limits the possibility to plan various borrowing operations coherently with the best market opportunities and structure maturities to achieve the best costs. The funding needs for Ukraine require mobilisation and disbursement in a cost-effective flexible and financially sound manner, integrating all funding needs including for N ext G eneration EU (“ NGEU ”) . I t is of paramount importance that this funding be organised under a single funding method in order to allow different policy needs to be met concurrently . To that end, it is necessary to amend Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 to establish the diversified funding strategy , currently implemented for borrowings under Decision (EU, Euratom) 2020/2053 2 as the baseline method for the implementation of borrowing operations. This strategy has allowed the successful mobilisation of funds for non-repayable support and loans under Regulation (EU) 2021/241 3 and a range of other EU policies in 2022. This will allow the Commission to finance the assistance to Ukraine under the proposed Regulation establishing an instrument to provide support to Ukraine 4 in a cost-efficient, flexible and financially sound manner to ensure parallel financing of all Union programmes relying on borrowing . T he extension of the scope of application of the diversified funding strategy goes beyond the funding needs for Ukraine and would be available to any future programmes . It will enable the Commission to use the infrastructure, which allows an integrated funding planning and communication to markets. In the absence of such a single funding method, the Commission would be required to continue financing different programmes of financial assistance separately. This would create cost and complexity as the different programmes of financial assistance would compete for a limited number of funding opportunities. It would fragment the supply of Union’s debt and reduce liquidity and investor interest in the separate programmes. Financing all financial assistance through a single funding method would therefore enhance the liquidity of the Union’s bonds their attractiveness and cost-effectiveness. The diversified funding strategy is a financing method through which funding transactions are organised in a manner consistent with the limits of financial liability authorised in the basic acts in order to achieve the policy objectives. The implementation of a diversified funding strategy does not change the financial liabilities arising from the borrowing. It provides the Commission with more flexibility in how the Union mobilises resources through bond issuance. Recourse to a diversified funding strategy as a single funding method will allow the Commission to decouple the timing and the maturity of single funding transactions from the disbursements to beneficiaries. A common liquidity pool financed by the issuance of short-term funding (EU-bills) enables the Commission to organise payments in accordance with a regular and agreed schedule, independently of the exact timing of the long-term bond issuance. This then allows payments to be made to beneficiaries independently of market conditions pre vailing at the time of the disbursement , and avoid s having to raise fixed amounts in volatile o r adverse conditions. Over the life time of the programme of financial assistance , the net liabilities generated are fully matched by countervailing assets ( amounts outstanding, still to be repaid under loans as they mature 5 ) . On this basis, the principles of budgetary neutrality and budgetary balance as set out in Article 310(1) TFEU are respected. The costs are fully borne by the beneficiaries based on a single cost allocation methodology that ensures transparent and proportional allocation of costs . The repayment obligations should remain with the beneficiaries of the financial assistance, in compliance with Article 220(5)(e) of the Financial Regulation. The common liquidity pool should be maintained at levels that would allow the Commission to meet all expected outflows over the short-term, based on a robust liquidity forecasting capacity. The existence of a large, well-stocked liquidity buffer, capable of managing disbursements over long periods, allows the diversified funding strategy to function without the need for other solutions to address temporary cash shortfalls. To support the most successful implementation of the diversified funding strategy, the Commission should, as far as possible, ensure a continuous market presence and to this end implement all necessary transactions aiming at achieving the best possible funding costs and at facilitating of transactions in debt securities of the Union and Euratom. The latter is crucial in supporting the active involvement of the widest range of investors to markets for Union’s debt instruments. The conduct of the diversified funding strategy requires that a single set of rules is followed in respect of all borrowing and lending programmes which rely on it. The Financial Regulation in its role of a single rulebook for the implementation of the EU budget should provide the basis for those rules. Following the entry into force of this amendment of the Financial Regulation, the Commission will adopt and implement a wider governance framework, risk management procedures, and cost allocation methodology. These new rules of the Financial Regulation should only apply to new financial assistance to third countries for which the basic acts enter into force on or after the date of entry into force of these amendments of the Financial Regulation and the parallel amendment of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2020/2093. The Commission proposed a recast of the Financial Regulation 6 that is being examined by the European Parliament and the Council. The present stand-alone proposal should be adopted as a matter of urgency and the changes incorporated in the pending recast during the legislative process . Consistency with existing policy provisions in the policy area The diversified funding strategy has been introduced for NGEU borrowing and has proven successful so far in that context. Consistency with other Union policies The diversified funding strategy will allow efficient use of borrowing capacity for Union policies which may make use of borrowing and lending operations.

EUROPEAN COMMISSIONBrussels, 9.11.2022COM(2022) 596 final2022/0370(COD)Proposal for aREGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCILamending Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 as regards the establishment of a diversified funding strategy as a general borrowing methodEXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM1.CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL•Reasons for and objectives of the proposalTheCommission has been conducting borrowing and lending operationsto providefinancial assistance in the form of loansto a beneficiary countryfor several decades. Theborrowing and lending operations are guaranteed under the Union’s budget and come under the wider scope of budgetary implementation. General rules for such operations are laid down in Article 220 of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/10461(“Financial Regulation”),whichprovides that the Commissioncan be empowered in a basic act to borrowon behalf of the Union or Euratom to on-lend the corresponding amounts to the beneficiary Member States or third countries under the conditions applicable to the borrowings.The cash flows between theborrowed funds and the loans are matched one-to-one. This means that market operationsarebased on disbursement needs, which limits the possibility to plan various borrowing operationscoherently withthe best market opportunities and structure maturities to achieve the best costs.Thefundingneedsfor Ukrainerequire mobilisation and disbursementin a cost-effectiveflexible and financially soundmanner,integrating allfundingneeds includingforNextGenerationEU(“NGEU”).It is of paramount importance that this funding beorganised underasingle funding methodin order to allow different policy needs to be metconcurrently.To that end, it is necessary to amend Regulation (EU, Euratom)2018/1046 to establish the diversified funding strategy,currently implemented for borrowings underDecision (EU, Euratom) 2020/20532as the baseline method fortheimplementation of borrowing operations.This strategy has allowed the successful mobilisation of funds fornon-repayable supportand loans under Regulation (EU) 2021/2413and a range of other EU policies in 2022.Thiswill allowtheCommissionto finance the assistance toUkraineunder the proposedRegulation establishing an instrumentto providesupport to Ukraine4in a cost-efficient, flexible and financially sound mannerto ensureparallelfinancingof all Unionprogrammesrelying on borrowing.The extension of the scope of application of the diversified funding strategy goes beyond the funding needs for Ukraineand would be available to any future programmes. It willenablethe Commission to use the infrastructure,which allowsan integrated funding planning and communication to markets.In the absence of such a single funding method, the Commission would be required to continue financing different programmes of financial assistance separately. This would create cost and complexity as the different programmes of financial assistance would compete for a limited number of funding opportunities. It would fragment the supply of Union’s debt and reduce liquidity and investor interest in the separate programmes. Financing all financial assistance through a single funding method would therefore enhance the liquidity of the Union’s bonds their attractiveness and cost-effectiveness.The diversified funding strategy is a financing method through which funding transactions are organised in a manner consistent with the limits of financial liability authorised in the basic acts in order to achieve the policy objectives. The implementation of a diversified funding strategy does not change the financial liabilities arising from the borrowing. It provides the Commission with more flexibility in how the Union mobilisesresources through bond issuance.Recourse to adiversified funding strategyas asingle fundingmethodwill allow theCommissionto decouple the timingand the maturityof single funding transactions from the disbursements to beneficiaries.A common liquidity pool financed by the issuance of short-term funding (EU-bills) enables the Commission to organise payments in accordance with a regular and agreed schedule, independently of the exact timing of the long-term bond issuance. This thenallowspayments tobe made tobeneficiaries independently of market conditionsprevailingat the time of the disbursement, and avoidshaving to raise fixed amounts in volatile oradverse conditions.Over the lifetimeof theprogramme offinancial assistance,thenetliabilities generated are fully matched by countervailing assets (amounts outstanding, still to be repaid underloans as they mature5).On this basis,the principles of budgetary neutrality and budgetary balance as set out in Article 310(1) TFEU are respected. The costs are fully borne by the beneficiaries based on a single cost allocation methodology that ensures transparent andproportionalallocation of costs.The repayment obligations should remain with the beneficiaries of the financial assistance, in compliance with Article 220(5)(e) of the Financial Regulation.The common liquidity pool should be maintained at levels that would allow the Commission to meet all expected outflows over the short-term, based on a robust liquidity forecasting capacity. The existence of a large, well-stocked liquidity buffer, capable of managing disbursements over long periods, allows the diversified funding strategy to function without the need for other solutions to address temporary cash shortfalls.To support the most successful implementation of the diversified funding strategy, the Commission should, as far as possible, ensure a continuous market presence and to this end implement all necessary transactions aiming at achieving the best possible funding costs and at facilitating of transactions in debt securities of the Union and Euratom. The latter is crucial in supporting the active involvement of the widest range of investors to markets for Union’s debt instruments.The conduct of the diversified funding strategy requires that a single set of rules is followed in respect of all borrowing and lending programmes which rely on it. The Financial Regulation in its role of a single rulebook for the implementation of the EU budget should provide the basis for those rules.Following the entry into force of this amendment of the Financial Regulation, the Commission will adopt and implement a wider governance framework, risk management procedures, and cost allocation methodology.These new rules of the Financial Regulation should only apply to new financial assistance to third countries for which the basic acts enter into force on or after the date of entry into force of these amendments of the Financial Regulation and the parallel amendment of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2020/2093.The Commission proposed a recast of the Financial Regulation6that is being examined by the European Parliament and the Council. The present stand-alone proposal should be adopted as a matter of urgency andthe changes incorporated in the pending recast during the legislative process.
Revised version (Article 89 Creation and administration of imprest accounts):
1. The creation of an imprest account and the appointment of an imprest administrator shall be the subject of a decision by the accounting officer of the Union institution, on the basis of a duly substantiated proposal from the authorising officer responsible. That decision shall set out the respective responsibilities and obligations of the imprest administrator and the authorising officer. Imprest administrators shall be chosen from officials or, should the need arise and only in duly substantiated cases, from other members of staff or in accordance with the conditions established in the internal rules of the Commission from personnel employed by the Commission in the field of crisis management aid and humanitarian aid operations provided that their employment contracts guarantee equivalent level of protection in terms of liability as applicable to staff pursuant to Article 95. Imprest administrators shall be chosen on the grounds of their knowledge, skills and particular qualifications as evidenced by diplomas or by appropriate professional experience, or after an appropriate training programme. 2. In proposals for decisions to create an imprest account, the authorising officer responsible shall ensure that: (a) priority is given to the use of budgetary procedures where there is access to the central computerised accounting system; (b) imprest accounts are used only in duly substantiated cases. In proposals for decisions to create an imprest account, the authorising officer responsible shall ensure that: (a) priority is given to the use of budgetary procedures where there is access to the central computerised accounting system; (b) imprest accounts are used only in duly substantiated cases. In decisions to create an imprest account, the accounting officer shall specify the operating terms and the conditions for use of the imprest account. The amendment of the operating terms for an imprest account shall also be the subject of a decision by the accounting officer on a duly substantiated proposal from the authorising officer responsible. 3. Bank accounts for the imprest shall be opened and monitored by the accounting officer, who shall also authorise delegated signatures on them on the basis of a duly substantiated proposal from the authorising officer responsible. 4. Imprest accounts shall be endowed by the accounting officer of the Union institution and shall be placed under the responsibility of imprest administrators. 5. Payments made shall be followed by formal final validation decisions or payment orders signed by the authorising officer responsible. The imprest transactions shall be settled by the authorising officer by the end of the following month, so that the accounting balance and the bank balance can be reconciled. 6. The accounting officer shall carry out checks, or have them carried out by a staff member in his or her own department or in the authorising department specifically empowered for that purpose. Those checks shall as a general rule be effected on the spot and, where necessary, without warning, to verify the existence of the funds allocated to the imprest administrators and the bookkeeping and to check that imprest transactions are settled within the time limit set. The accounting officer shall communicate the findings of those checks to the authorising officer responsible.
Article 90 Withdrawal of delegation of powers to and suspension of duties of financial actors
1. Authorising officers responsible may at any time have their delegation or subdelegation withdrawn temporarily or definitively by the authority which appointed them. 2. Accounting officers or imprest administrators, or both, may at any time be suspended temporarily or definitively from their duties by the authority which appointed them. 3. Paragraphs 1 and 2 shall be without prejudice to any disciplinary action taken in respect of the financial actors referred to in those paragraphs.
Article 91 Liability of financial actors for illegal activity, fraud or corruption
1. This Chapter is without prejudice to any liability under criminal law which the financial actors referred to in Article 90 may incur as provided for in applicable national law and in the provisions in force concerning the protection of the financial interests of the Union and the fight against corruption involving Union officials or officials of Member States. 2. Without prejudice to Articles 92, 94 and 95 of this Regulation, each authorising officer responsible, accounting officer or imprest administrator shall be liable to disciplinary action and payment of compensation as laid down in the Staff Regulations, or for the personnel employed by the Commission in the field of crisis management aid and humanitarian aid operations as referred to in Article 89(1) of this Regulation in their employment contracts. In the event of illegal activity, fraud or corruption which may harm the interests of the Union, the matter shall be referred to the authorities and bodies designated by the applicable legislation, in particular to OLAF.
Article 92 Rules applicable to authorising officers
1. The authorising officer responsible shall be liable for payment of compensation as laid down in the Staff Regulations. 2. The obligation to pay compensation shall apply in particular if the authorising officer responsible, whether intentionally or through gross negligence on his or her part: (a) determines entitlements to be recovered or issues recovery orders, commits expenditure or signs a payment order without complying with this Regulation; (b) omits to draw up a document establishing an amount receivable, neglects to issue a recovery order or is late in issuing it or is late in issuing a payment order, thereby rendering the Union institution liable to civil action by third parties. 3. An authorising officer by delegation or sub-delegation who receives a binding instruction which he or she considers to be irregular or contrary to the principle of sound financial management, in particular because the instruction cannot be carried out with the resources allocated to him or her, shall inform the authority from which he or she received the delegation or subdelegation about that fact in writing. If the instruction is confirmed in writing and that confirmation is received in good time and is sufficiently clear, in that it refers explicitly to the points which the authorising officer by delegation or subdelegation has challenged, the authorising officer by delegation or subdelegation shall not be held liable. He or she shall carry out the instruction, unless it is manifestly illegal or constitutes a breach of the relevant safety standards. The same procedure shall apply in cases where an authorising officer considers that a decision, which is his or her responsibility to take, is irregular or contrary to the principle of sound financial management or where an authorising officer learns, in the course of acting on a binding instruction, that the circumstances of the case could give rise to such a situation. Any instructions confirmed in the circumstances referred to in this paragraph shall be recorded by the authorising officer by delegation responsible and mentioned in his or her annual activity report. 4. In the event of subdelegation within his or her service, the authorising officer by delegation shall continue to be responsible for the efficiency and effectiveness of the internal management and control systems put in place and for the choice of the authorising officer by subdelegation. 5. In the event of subdelegation to Heads of Union delegations and their deputies, the authorising officer by delegation shall be responsible for the definition of the internal management and control systems put in place, as well as their efficiency and effectiveness. Heads of Union delegations shall be responsible for the adequate setting up and functioning of those systems, in accordance with the instructions of the authorising officer by delegation, and for the management of the funds and the operations they carry out within the Union delegation under their responsibility. Before taking up their duties, they shall complete specific training courses on the tasks and responsibilities of authorising officers and budget implementation. Heads of Union delegations shall in accordance with Article 76(3) report on their responsibilities pursuant to the first subparagraph of this paragraph. Each year, Heads of Union delegations shall provide to the authorising officer by delegation of the Commission assurance on the internal management and control systems put in place in their delegation, as well as on the management of operations subdelegated to them, and the results thereof, in order to allow the authorising officer to make the statement of assurance provided for in Article 74(9). This paragraph shall also apply to deputy Heads of Union delegations when they act as authorising officers by subdelegation in the absence of Heads of Union delegations.
Amendment rationale: CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL Reasons for and objectives of the proposal The Commission has been conducting borrowing and lending operations to provide financial assistance in the form of loans to a beneficiary country for several decades . The borrowing and lending operations are guaranteed under the Union’s budget and come under the wider scope of budgetary implementation. G eneral rules for such operations are laid down in Article 220 of Regulation ( EU, Euratom ) 2018/1046 1 (“Financial Regulation”) , which provides that the Commission can be empowered in a basic act to borrow on behalf of the Union or Euratom to on-lend the corresponding amounts to the beneficiary Member States or third countries under the conditions applicable to the borrowings. The cash flows between the borrowed funds and the loans are matched one-to-one. This means that market operations are based on disbursement needs, which limits the possibility to plan various borrowing operations coherently with the best market opportunities and structure maturities to achieve the best costs. The funding needs for Ukraine require mobilisation and disbursement in a cost-effective flexible and financially sound manner, integrating all funding needs including for N ext G eneration EU (“ NGEU ”) . I t is of paramount importance that this funding be organised under a single funding method in order to allow different policy needs to be met concurrently . To that end, it is necessary to amend Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 to establish the diversified funding strategy , currently implemented for borrowings under Decision (EU, Euratom) 2020/2053 2 as the baseline method for the implementation of borrowing operations. This strategy has allowed the successful mobilisation of funds for non-repayable support and loans under Regulation (EU) 2021/241 3 and a range of other EU policies in 2022. This will allow the Commission to finance the assistance to Ukraine under the proposed Regulation establishing an instrument to provide support to Ukraine 4 in a cost-efficient, flexible and financially sound manner to ensure parallel financing of all Union programmes relying on borrowing . T he extension of the scope of application of the diversified funding strategy goes beyond the funding needs for Ukraine and would be available to any future programmes . It will enable the Commission to use the infrastructure, which allows an integrated funding planning and communication to markets. In the absence of such a single funding method, the Commission would be required to continue financing different programmes of financial assistance separately. This would create cost and complexity as the different programmes of financial assistance would compete for a limited number of funding opportunities. It would fragment the supply of Union’s debt and reduce liquidity and investor interest in the separate programmes. Financing all financial assistance through a single funding method would therefore enhance the liquidity of the Union’s bonds their attractiveness and cost-effectiveness. The diversified funding strategy is a financing method through which funding transactions are organised in a manner consistent with the limits of financial liability authorised in the basic acts in order to achieve the policy objectives. The implementation of a diversified funding strategy does not change the financial liabilities arising from the borrowing. It provides the Commission with more flexibility in how the Union mobilises resources through bond issuance. Recourse to a diversified funding strategy as a single funding method will allow the Commission to decouple the timing and the maturity of single funding transactions from the disbursements to beneficiaries. A common liquidity pool financed by the issuance of short-term funding (EU-bills) enables the Commission to organise payments in accordance with a regular and agreed schedule, independently of the exact timing of the long-term bond issuance. This then allows payments to be made to beneficiaries independently of market conditions pre vailing at the time of the disbursement , and avoid s having to raise fixed amounts in volatile o r adverse conditions. Over the life time of the programme of financial assistance , the net liabilities generated are fully matched by countervailing assets ( amounts outstanding, still to be repaid under loans as they mature 5 ) . On this basis, the principles of budgetary neutrality and budgetary balance as set out in Article 310(1) TFEU are respected. The costs are fully borne by the beneficiaries based on a single cost allocation methodology that ensures transparent and proportional allocation of costs . The repayment obligations should remain with the beneficiaries of the financial assistance, in compliance with Article 220(5)(e) of the Financial Regulation. The common liquidity pool should be maintained at levels that would allow the Commission to meet all expected outflows over the short-term, based on a robust liquidity forecasting capacity. The existence of a large, well-stocked liquidity buffer, capable of managing disbursements over long periods, allows the diversified funding strategy to function without the need for other solutions to address temporary cash shortfalls. To support the most successful implementation of the diversified funding strategy, the Commission should, as far as possible, ensure a continuous market presence and to this end implement all necessary transactions aiming at achieving the best possible funding costs and at facilitating of transactions in debt securities of the Union and Euratom. The latter is crucial in supporting the active involvement of the widest range of investors to markets for Union’s debt instruments. The conduct of the diversified funding strategy requires that a single set of rules is followed in respect of all borrowing and lending programmes which rely on it. The Financial Regulation in its role of a single rulebook for the implementation of the EU budget should provide the basis for those rules. Following the entry into force of this amendment of the Financial Regulation, the Commission will adopt and implement a wider governance framework, risk management procedures, and cost allocation methodology. These new rules of the Financial Regulation should only apply to new financial assistance to third countries for which the basic acts enter into force on or after the date of entry into force of these amendments of the Financial Regulation and the parallel amendment of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2020/2093. The Commission proposed a recast of the Financial Regulation 6 that is being examined by the European Parliament and the Council. The present stand-alone proposal should be adopted as a matter of urgency and the changes incorporated in the pending recast during the legislative process . Consistency with existing policy provisions in the policy area The diversified funding strategy has been introduced for NGEU borrowing and has proven successful so far in that context. Consistency with other Union policies The diversified funding strategy will allow efficient use of borrowing capacity for Union policies which may make use of borrowing and lending operations.

EUROPEAN COMMISSIONBrussels, 9.11.2022COM(2022) 596 final2022/0370(COD)Proposal for aREGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCILamending Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 as regards the establishment of a diversified funding strategy as a general borrowing methodEXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM1.CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL•Reasons for and objectives of the proposalTheCommission has been conducting borrowing and lending operationsto providefinancial assistance in the form of loansto a beneficiary countryfor several decades. Theborrowing and lending operations are guaranteed under the Union’s budget and come under the wider scope of budgetary implementation. General rules for such operations are laid down in Article 220 of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/10461(“Financial Regulation”),whichprovides that the Commissioncan be empowered in a basic act to borrowon behalf of the Union or Euratom to on-lend the corresponding amounts to the beneficiary Member States or third countries under the conditions applicable to the borrowings.The cash flows between theborrowed funds and the loans are matched one-to-one. This means that market operationsarebased on disbursement needs, which limits the possibility to plan various borrowing operationscoherently withthe best market opportunities and structure maturities to achieve the best costs.Thefundingneedsfor Ukrainerequire mobilisation and disbursementin a cost-effectiveflexible and financially soundmanner,integrating allfundingneeds includingforNextGenerationEU(“NGEU”).It is of paramount importance that this funding beorganised underasingle funding methodin order to allow different policy needs to be metconcurrently.To that end, it is necessary to amend Regulation (EU, Euratom)2018/1046 to establish the diversified funding strategy,currently implemented for borrowings underDecision (EU, Euratom) 2020/20532as the baseline method fortheimplementation of borrowing operations.This strategy has allowed the successful mobilisation of funds fornon-repayable supportand loans under Regulation (EU) 2021/2413and a range of other EU policies in 2022.Thiswill allowtheCommissionto finance the assistance toUkraineunder the proposedRegulation establishing an instrumentto providesupport to Ukraine4in a cost-efficient, flexible and financially sound mannerto ensureparallelfinancingof all Unionprogrammesrelying on borrowing.The extension of the scope of application of the diversified funding strategy goes beyond the funding needs for Ukraineand would be available to any future programmes. It willenablethe Commission to use the infrastructure,which allowsan integrated funding planning and communication to markets.In the absence of such a single funding method, the Commission would be required to continue financing different programmes of financial assistance separately. This would create cost and complexity as the different programmes of financial assistance would compete for a limited number of funding opportunities. It would fragment the supply of Union’s debt and reduce liquidity and investor interest in the separate programmes. Financing all financial assistance through a single funding method would therefore enhance the liquidity of the Union’s bonds their attractiveness and cost-effectiveness.The diversified funding strategy is a financing method through which funding transactions are organised in a manner consistent with the limits of financial liability authorised in the basic acts in order to achieve the policy objectives. The implementation of a diversified funding strategy does not change the financial liabilities arising from the borrowing. It provides the Commission with more flexibility in how the Union mobilisesresources through bond issuance.Recourse to adiversified funding strategyas asingle fundingmethodwill allow theCommissionto decouple the timingand the maturityof single funding transactions from the disbursements to beneficiaries.A common liquidity pool financed by the issuance of short-term funding (EU-bills) enables the Commission to organise payments in accordance with a regular and agreed schedule, independently of the exact timing of the long-term bond issuance. This thenallowspayments tobe made tobeneficiaries independently of market conditionsprevailingat the time of the disbursement, and avoidshaving to raise fixed amounts in volatile oradverse conditions.Over the lifetimeof theprogramme offinancial assistance,thenetliabilities generated are fully matched by countervailing assets (amounts outstanding, still to be repaid underloans as they mature5).On this basis,the principles of budgetary neutrality and budgetary balance as set out in Article 310(1) TFEU are respected. The costs are fully borne by the beneficiaries based on a single cost allocation methodology that ensures transparent andproportionalallocation of costs.The repayment obligations should remain with the beneficiaries of the financial assistance, in compliance with Article 220(5)(e) of the Financial Regulation.The common liquidity pool should be maintained at levels that would allow the Commission to meet all expected outflows over the short-term, based on a robust liquidity forecasting capacity. The existence of a large, well-stocked liquidity buffer, capable of managing disbursements over long periods, allows the diversified funding strategy to function without the need for other solutions to address temporary cash shortfalls.To support the most successful implementation of the diversified funding strategy, the Commission should, as far as possible, ensure a continuous market presence and to this end implement all necessary transactions aiming at achieving the best possible funding costs and at facilitating of transactions in debt securities of the Union and Euratom. The latter is crucial in supporting the active involvement of the widest range of investors to markets for Union’s debt instruments.The conduct of the diversified funding strategy requires that a single set of rules is followed in respect of all borrowing and lending programmes which rely on it. The Financial Regulation in its role of a single rulebook for the implementation of the EU budget should provide the basis for those rules.Following the entry into force of this amendment of the Financial Regulation, the Commission will adopt and implement a wider governance framework, risk management procedures, and cost allocation methodology.These new rules of the Financial Regulation should only apply to new financial assistance to third countries for which the basic acts enter into force on or after the date of entry into force of these amendments of the Financial Regulation and the parallel amendment of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2020/2093.The Commission proposed a recast of the Financial Regulation6that is being examined by the European Parliament and the Council. The present stand-alone proposal should be adopted as a matter of urgency andthe changes incorporated in the pending recast during the legislative process.
Revised version (Article 92 Rules applicable to authorising officers):
1. The authorising officer responsible shall be liable for payment of compensation as laid down in the Staff Regulations. 2. The obligation to pay compensation shall apply in particular if the authorising officer responsible, whether intentionally or through gross negligence on his or her part: (a) determines entitlements to be recovered or issues recovery orders, commits expenditure or signs a payment order without complying with this Regulation; (b) omits to draw up a document establishing an amount receivable, neglects to issue a recovery order or is late in issuing it or is late in issuing a payment order, thereby rendering the Union institution liable to civil action by third parties. The obligation to pay compensation shall apply in particular if the authorising officer responsible, whether intentionally or through gross negligence on his or her part: (a) determines entitlements to be recovered or issues recovery orders, commits expenditure or signs a payment order without complying with this Regulation; (b) omits to draw up a document establishing an amount receivable, neglects to issue a recovery order or is late in issuing it or is late in issuing a payment order, thereby rendering the Union institution liable to civil action by third parties. 3. An authorising officer by delegation or sub-delegation who receives a binding instruction which he or she considers to be irregular or contrary to the principle of sound financial management, in particular because the instruction cannot be carried out with the resources allocated to him or her, shall inform the authority from which he or she received the delegation or subdelegation about that fact in writing. If the instruction is confirmed in writing and that confirmation is received in good time and is sufficiently clear, in that it refers explicitly to the points which the authorising officer by delegation or subdelegation has challenged, the authorising officer by delegation or subdelegation shall not be held liable. He or she shall carry out the instruction, unless it is manifestly illegal or constitutes a breach of the relevant safety standards. The same procedure shall apply in cases where an authorising officer considers that a decision, which is his or her responsibility to take, is irregular or contrary to the principle of sound financial management or where an authorising officer learns, in the course of acting on a binding instruction, that the circumstances of the case could give rise to such a situation. Any instructions confirmed in the circumstances referred to in this paragraph shall be recorded by the authorising officer by delegation responsible and mentioned in his or her annual activity report. 4. In the event of subdelegation within his or her service, the authorising officer by delegation shall continue to be responsible for the efficiency and effectiveness of the internal management and control systems put in place and for the choice of the authorising officer by subdelegation. 5. In the event of subdelegation to Heads of Union delegations and their deputies, the authorising officer by delegation shall be responsible for the definition of the internal management and control systems put in place, as well as their efficiency and effectiveness. Heads of Union delegations shall be responsible for the adequate setting up and functioning of those systems, in accordance with the instructions of the authorising officer by delegation, and for the management of the funds and the operations they carry out within the Union delegation under their responsibility. Before taking up their duties, they shall complete specific training courses on the tasks and responsibilities of authorising officers and budget implementation. Heads of Union delegations shall in accordance with Article 76(3) report on their responsibilities pursuant to the first subparagraph of this paragraph. Each year, Heads of Union delegations shall provide to the authorising officer by delegation of the Commission assurance on the internal management and control systems put in place in their delegation, as well as on the management of operations subdelegated to them, and the results thereof, in order to allow the authorising officer to make the statement of assurance provided for in Article 74(9). This paragraph shall also apply to deputy Heads of Union delegations when they act as authorising officers by subdelegation in the absence of Heads of Union delegations.
Article 93 Treatment of financial irregularities on the part of a member of staff
1. Without prejudice to the powers of OLAF and to the administrative autonomy of Union institutions, Union bodies, European offices or bodies or persons entrusted with the implementation of specific actions in the CFSP pursuant to Title V of the TEU in respect of members of their staff and with due regard to the protection of whistle-blowers, any infringement of this Regulation, or of a provision relating to financial management or the checking of operations, resulting from an act or omission of a member of staff shall be referred for an opinion to the panel referred to in Article 143, by any of the following: (a) the appointing authority in charge of disciplinary matters; (b) the authorising officer responsible, including Heads of Union delegations and their deputies in their absence acting as authorising officers by subdelegation in accordance with Article 60(2). Where the panel is directly informed of a matter by a member of staff, it shall transmit the file to the appointing authority of the Union institution, Union body, European office or body or person concerned and shall inform the member of staff accordingly. The appointing authority may request the panel’s opinion on the case. 2. A request for an opinion of the panel pursuant to the first subparagraph of paragraph 1 shall be accompanied by a description of the facts and the act or omission which the panel is asked to assess, as well as by relevant supporting documents, including reports of any investigation which has taken place. Wherever possible, the information shall be produced in anonymised form. Before submitting a request or any additional information to the panel, the appointing authority or the authorising officer, as appropriate, shall give the member of staff involved the opportunity to submit its observations, after having notified to him or her the supporting documents referred to in the first subparagraph, insofar as that notification does not seriously undermine the pursuit of further investigations. 3. In the cases referred in paragraph 1 of this Article, the panel referred to in Article 143 shall be competent to assess whether, on the basis of the elements submitted to it pursuant to paragraph 2 of this Article and any additional information received, a financial irregularity has occurred. On the basis of the opinion of the panel, the Union institution, Union body, European office or body or person concerned shall decide on the appropriate follow-up actions in accordance with the Staff Regulations. If the panel detects systemic problems, it shall make a recommendation to the authorising officer and to the authorising officer by delegation, unless the latter is the member of staff involved, as well as to the internal auditor. 4. Where the panel gives the opinion referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article, it shall be composed of the members referred to in Article 143(2) as well as the following three additional members, which shall be appointed taking into account the need for avoiding any conflicts of interests: (a) a representative of the appointing authority in charge of disciplinary matters of the Union institution, Union body, European office or body or person concerned; (b) a member appointed by the staff committee of the Union institution, Union body, European office or body or person concerned; (c) a member of the legal service of the Union institution employing the member of staff concerned. Where the panel gives the opinion referred to in paragraph 1, it shall be addressed to the appointing authority of the Union institution, Union body, European office or body or person concerned. 5. The panel shall have no investigative powers. The Union institution, Union body, European office or body or person concerned shall cooperate with the panel with a view to ensuring that it has all the information necessary for giving its opinion. 6. Where the panel considers that the case is a matter for OLAF, it shall in accordance with paragraph 1 transmit the file to the relevant appointing authority without delay and inform OLAF immediately. 7. The Member States shall fully support the Union in the enforcement of any liability, under Article 22 of the Staff Regulations, of temporary staff to whom point (e) of Article 2 of the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Union applies.
Article 94 Rules applicable to accounting officers
An accounting officer shall be liable to disciplinary action and payment of compensation, as laid down in, and in accordance with, the procedures in the Staff Regulations. An accounting officer may, in particular, become liable as a result of any of the following forms of misconduct on his or her part: (a) losing or damaging funds, assets or documents in his or her keeping; (b) wrongly altering bank accounts or postal giro accounts; (c) recovering or paying amounts which are not in conformity with the corresponding recovery or payment orders; (d) failing to collect revenue due.
Article 95 Rules applicable to imprest administrators
An imprest administrator may in particular become liable as a result of any of the following forms of misconduct on his or her part: (a) losing or damaging funds, assets or documents in his or her keeping; (b) not providing proper supporting documents for the payments he or she has made; (c) making payments to persons other than those entitled to such payments; (d) failing to collect revenue due.
Article 96 Own resources
1. An estimate of revenue constituted by own resources, as referred to in Decision 2014/335/EU, Euratom shall be entered in the budget in euro. The corresponding own resources shall be made available in accordance with Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 609/2014. 2. The authorising officer shall draw up a schedule indicating when the own resources defined in Decision 2014/335/EU, Euratom will be made available to the Commission. Own resources shall be established and recovered in accordance with the rules adopted pursuant to that Decision. For accounting purposes, the authorising officer shall issue a recovery order for credits and debits to the account for own resources referred to in Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 609/2014.
Article 97 Estimate of amounts receivable
1. When the authorising officer responsible has sufficient and reliable information in respect of any measure or situation which may give rise to an amount being owed to the Union, the authorising officer responsible shall make an estimate of the amount receivable. 2. The estimate of the amount receivable shall be adjusted by the authorising officer responsible as soon as he or she is aware of an event modifying the measure or the situation which gave rise to the estimate being made. When establishing the recovery order on a measure or situation that had previously given rise to an estimate of amounts receivable, that estimate shall be adjusted accordingly by the authorising officer responsible. If the recovery order is drawn up for the same amount as the original estimate of amounts receivable, that estimate shall be reduced to zero. 3. By way of derogation from paragraph 1, no estimate of the amount receivable shall be made before Member States make available to the Commission the amounts of own resources defined in Decision 2014/335/EU, Euratom, which are paid at fixed intervals by Member States. The authorising officer responsible shall issue a recovery order in respect of those amounts.
Article 98 Establishment of amounts receivable
1. In order to establish an amount receivable, the authorising officer responsible shall: (a) verify that the debt exists; (b) determine or verify the reality and the amount of the debt; and (c) verify the conditions according to which the debt is due. The establishment of an amount receivable shall constitute recognition of the right of the Union in respect of a debtor and establishment of entitlement to demand that the debtor pay the debt. 2. Any amount receivable that is identified as being certain, of a fixed amount and due shall be established by a recovery order by which the authorising officer responsible instructs the accounting officer to recover the amount. It shall be followed by a debit note sent to the debtor, except for the cases where a waiver procedure is carried out immediately in accordance with the second subparagraph of paragraph 4. Both the recovery order and the debit note shall be drawn up by the authorising officer responsible. The authorising officer shall send the debit note immediately after establishing the amount receivable and at the latest within a period of five years from the time when the Union institution was, in normal circumstances, in a position to claim its debt. Such period shall not apply where the authorising officer responsible establishes that, despite the efforts which the Union institution has made, the delay in acting was caused by the debtor’s conduct. 3. To establish an amount receivable the authorising officer responsible shall ensure that: (a) the amount receivable is certain, meaning that it is not subject to any condition; (b) the amount receivable is fixed, expressed precisely in cash terms; (c) the amount receivable is due and is not subject to any payment time; (d) the particulars of the debtor are correct; (e) the amount is booked to the correct budgetary item; (f) the supporting documents are in order; and (g) the principle of sound financial management is complied with, in particular with regard to the criteria referred to in point (a) or (b) of the first subparagraph of Article 101(2). 4. The debit note shall be to inform the debtor that: (a) the Union has established the amount receivable; (b) if payment of the debt is made within the deadline, as specified in the debit note, no default interest will be due; (c) failing payment of the debt within the deadline referred to in point (b) of this subparagraph the debt shall bear interest at the rate referred to in Article 99, without any prejudice to any specific regulations applicable; (d) failing payment of the debt by the deadline referred to in point (b) the Union institution will effect recovery either by offsetting or by enforcement of any guarantee lodged in advance; (e) the accounting officer may in exceptional circumstances effect recovery by offsetting before the deadline referred to in point (b), where it is necessary to protect the financial interests of the Union when he or she has justified grounds to believe that the amount due to the Union would be lost, after the debtor has been informed of the reasons and date of the recovery by offsetting; (f) if, after taking all the steps set out in points (a) to (e) of this subparagraph, the amount has not been recovered in full, the Union institution will effect recovery by enforcement of a decision secured either in accordance with Article 100(2) or by legal action. Where following the verification of the particulars of the debtor or on the basis of other relevant information available at the time, it is clear that the debt falls under the cases referred to in point (a) or (b) of the first subparagraph of Article 101(2), or that the debit note has not been sent in accordance with paragraph 2 of this Article, the authorising officer shall, after having established the amount receivable, decide to directly waive recovery in accordance with Article 101 without sending a debit note, in agreement with the accounting officer. In all other cases, the authorising officer shall print out the debit note and send it to the debtor. The accounting officer shall be informed of the dispatch of the debit note through the financial information system. 5. Amounts wrongly paid shall be recovered.
Amendment rationale: CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL Reasons for and objectives of the proposal The Commission has been conducting borrowing and lending operations to provide financial assistance in the form of loans to a beneficiary country for several decades . The borrowing and lending operations are guaranteed under the Union’s budget and come under the wider scope of budgetary implementation. G eneral rules for such operations are laid down in Article 220 of Regulation ( EU, Euratom ) 2018/1046 1 (“Financial Regulation”) , which provides that the Commission can be empowered in a basic act to borrow on behalf of the Union or Euratom to on-lend the corresponding amounts to the beneficiary Member States or third countries under the conditions applicable to the borrowings. The cash flows between the borrowed funds and the loans are matched one-to-one. This means that market operations are based on disbursement needs, which limits the possibility to plan various borrowing operations coherently with the best market opportunities and structure maturities to achieve the best costs. The funding needs for Ukraine require mobilisation and disbursement in a cost-effective flexible and financially sound manner, integrating all funding needs including for N ext G eneration EU (“ NGEU ”) . I t is of paramount importance that this funding be organised under a single funding method in order to allow different policy needs to be met concurrently . To that end, it is necessary to amend Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 to establish the diversified funding strategy , currently implemented for borrowings under Decision (EU, Euratom) 2020/2053 2 as the baseline method for the implementation of borrowing operations. This strategy has allowed the successful mobilisation of funds for non-repayable support and loans under Regulation (EU) 2021/241 3 and a range of other EU policies in 2022. This will allow the Commission to finance the assistance to Ukraine under the proposed Regulation establishing an instrument to provide support to Ukraine 4 in a cost-efficient, flexible and financially sound manner to ensure parallel financing of all Union programmes relying on borrowing . T he extension of the scope of application of the diversified funding strategy goes beyond the funding needs for Ukraine and would be available to any future programmes . It will enable the Commission to use the infrastructure, which allows an integrated funding planning and communication to markets. In the absence of such a single funding method, the Commission would be required to continue financing different programmes of financial assistance separately. This would create cost and complexity as the different programmes of financial assistance would compete for a limited number of funding opportunities. It would fragment the supply of Union’s debt and reduce liquidity and investor interest in the separate programmes. Financing all financial assistance through a single funding method would therefore enhance the liquidity of the Union’s bonds their attractiveness and cost-effectiveness. The diversified funding strategy is a financing method through which funding transactions are organised in a manner consistent with the limits of financial liability authorised in the basic acts in order to achieve the policy objectives. The implementation of a diversified funding strategy does not change the financial liabilities arising from the borrowing. It provides the Commission with more flexibility in how the Union mobilises resources through bond issuance. Recourse to a diversified funding strategy as a single funding method will allow the Commission to decouple the timing and the maturity of single funding transactions from the disbursements to beneficiaries. A common liquidity pool financed by the issuance of short-term funding (EU-bills) enables the Commission to organise payments in accordance with a regular and agreed schedule, independently of the exact timing of the long-term bond issuance. This then allows payments to be made to beneficiaries independently of market conditions pre vailing at the time of the disbursement , and avoid s having to raise fixed amounts in volatile o r adverse conditions. Over the life time of the programme of financial assistance , the net liabilities generated are fully matched by countervailing assets ( amounts outstanding, still to be repaid under loans as they mature 5 ) . On this basis, the principles of budgetary neutrality and budgetary balance as set out in Article 310(1) TFEU are respected. The costs are fully borne by the beneficiaries based on a single cost allocation methodology that ensures transparent and proportional allocation of costs . The repayment obligations should remain with the beneficiaries of the financial assistance, in compliance with Article 220(5)(e) of the Financial Regulation. The common liquidity pool should be maintained at levels that would allow the Commission to meet all expected outflows over the short-term, based on a robust liquidity forecasting capacity. The existence of a large, well-stocked liquidity buffer, capable of managing disbursements over long periods, allows the diversified funding strategy to function without the need for other solutions to address temporary cash shortfalls. To support the most successful implementation of the diversified funding strategy, the Commission should, as far as possible, ensure a continuous market presence and to this end implement all necessary transactions aiming at achieving the best possible funding costs and at facilitating of transactions in debt securities of the Union and Euratom. The latter is crucial in supporting the active involvement of the widest range of investors to markets for Union’s debt instruments. The conduct of the diversified funding strategy requires that a single set of rules is followed in respect of all borrowing and lending programmes which rely on it. The Financial Regulation in its role of a single rulebook for the implementation of the EU budget should provide the basis for those rules. Following the entry into force of this amendment of the Financial Regulation, the Commission will adopt and implement a wider governance framework, risk management procedures, and cost allocation methodology. These new rules of the Financial Regulation should only apply to new financial assistance to third countries for which the basic acts enter into force on or after the date of entry into force of these amendments of the Financial Regulation and the parallel amendment of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2020/2093. The Commission proposed a recast of the Financial Regulation 6 that is being examined by the European Parliament and the Council. The present stand-alone proposal should be adopted as a matter of urgency and the changes incorporated in the pending recast during the legislative process . Consistency with existing policy provisions in the policy area The diversified funding strategy has been introduced for NGEU borrowing and has proven successful so far in that context. Consistency with other Union policies The diversified funding strategy will allow efficient use of borrowing capacity for Union policies which may make use of borrowing and lending operations.

EUROPEAN COMMISSIONBrussels, 9.11.2022COM(2022) 596 final2022/0370(COD)Proposal for aREGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCILamending Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 as regards the establishment of a diversified funding strategy as a general borrowing methodEXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM1.CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL•Reasons for and objectives of the proposalTheCommission has been conducting borrowing and lending operationsto providefinancial assistance in the form of loansto a beneficiary countryfor several decades. Theborrowing and lending operations are guaranteed under the Union’s budget and come under the wider scope of budgetary implementation. General rules for such operations are laid down in Article 220 of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/10461(“Financial Regulation”),whichprovides that the Commissioncan be empowered in a basic act to borrowon behalf of the Union or Euratom to on-lend the corresponding amounts to the beneficiary Member States or third countries under the conditions applicable to the borrowings.The cash flows between theborrowed funds and the loans are matched one-to-one. This means that market operationsarebased on disbursement needs, which limits the possibility to plan various borrowing operationscoherently withthe best market opportunities and structure maturities to achieve the best costs.Thefundingneedsfor Ukrainerequire mobilisation and disbursementin a cost-effectiveflexible and financially soundmanner,integrating allfundingneeds includingforNextGenerationEU(“NGEU”).It is of paramount importance that this funding beorganised underasingle funding methodin order to allow different policy needs to be metconcurrently.To that end, it is necessary to amend Regulation (EU, Euratom)2018/1046 to establish the diversified funding strategy,currently implemented for borrowings underDecision (EU, Euratom) 2020/20532as the baseline method fortheimplementation of borrowing operations.This strategy has allowed the successful mobilisation of funds fornon-repayable supportand loans under Regulation (EU) 2021/2413and a range of other EU policies in 2022.Thiswill allowtheCommissionto finance the assistance toUkraineunder the proposedRegulation establishing an instrumentto providesupport to Ukraine4in a cost-efficient, flexible and financially sound mannerto ensureparallelfinancingof all Unionprogrammesrelying on borrowing.The extension of the scope of application of the diversified funding strategy goes beyond the funding needs for Ukraineand would be available to any future programmes. It willenablethe Commission to use the infrastructure,which allowsan integrated funding planning and communication to markets.In the absence of such a single funding method, the Commission would be required to continue financing different programmes of financial assistance separately. This would create cost and complexity as the different programmes of financial assistance would compete for a limited number of funding opportunities. It would fragment the supply of Union’s debt and reduce liquidity and investor interest in the separate programmes. Financing all financial assistance through a single funding method would therefore enhance the liquidity of the Union’s bonds their attractiveness and cost-effectiveness.The diversified funding strategy is a financing method through which funding transactions are organised in a manner consistent with the limits of financial liability authorised in the basic acts in order to achieve the policy objectives. The implementation of a diversified funding strategy does not change the financial liabilities arising from the borrowing. It provides the Commission with more flexibility in how the Union mobilisesresources through bond issuance.Recourse to adiversified funding strategyas asingle fundingmethodwill allow theCommissionto decouple the timingand the maturityof single funding transactions from the disbursements to beneficiaries.A common liquidity pool financed by the issuance of short-term funding (EU-bills) enables the Commission to organise payments in accordance with a regular and agreed schedule, independently of the exact timing of the long-term bond issuance. This thenallowspayments tobe made tobeneficiaries independently of market conditionsprevailingat the time of the disbursement, and avoidshaving to raise fixed amounts in volatile oradverse conditions.Over the lifetimeof theprogramme offinancial assistance,thenetliabilities generated are fully matched by countervailing assets (amounts outstanding, still to be repaid underloans as they mature5).On this basis,the principles of budgetary neutrality and budgetary balance as set out in Article 310(1) TFEU are respected. The costs are fully borne by the beneficiaries based on a single cost allocation methodology that ensures transparent andproportionalallocation of costs.The repayment obligations should remain with the beneficiaries of the financial assistance, in compliance with Article 220(5)(e) of the Financial Regulation.The common liquidity pool should be maintained at levels that would allow the Commission to meet all expected outflows over the short-term, based on a robust liquidity forecasting capacity. The existence of a large, well-stocked liquidity buffer, capable of managing disbursements over long periods, allows the diversified funding strategy to function without the need for other solutions to address temporary cash shortfalls.To support the most successful implementation of the diversified funding strategy, the Commission should, as far as possible, ensure a continuous market presence and to this end implement all necessary transactions aiming at achieving the best possible funding costs and at facilitating of transactions in debt securities of the Union and Euratom. The latter is crucial in supporting the active involvement of the widest range of investors to markets for Union’s debt instruments.The conduct of the diversified funding strategy requires that a single set of rules is followed in respect of all borrowing and lending programmes which rely on it. The Financial Regulation in its role of a single rulebook for the implementation of the EU budget should provide the basis for those rules.Following the entry into force of this amendment of the Financial Regulation, the Commission will adopt and implement a wider governance framework, risk management procedures, and cost allocation methodology.These new rules of the Financial Regulation should only apply to new financial assistance to third countries for which the basic acts enter into force on or after the date of entry into force of these amendments of the Financial Regulation and the parallel amendment of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2020/2093.The Commission proposed a recast of the Financial Regulation6that is being examined by the European Parliament and the Council. The present stand-alone proposal should be adopted as a matter of urgency andthe changes incorporated in the pending recast during the legislative process.
Revised version (Article 98 Establishment of amounts receivable):
In order to establish an amount receivable, the authorising officer responsible shall: (a) verify that the debt exists; (b) determine or verify the reality and the amount of the debt; and (c) verify the conditions according to which the debt is due. The establishment of an amount receivable shall constitute recognition of the right of the Union in respect of a debtor and establishment of entitlement to demand that the debtor pay the debt. 2. Any amount receivable that is identified as being certain, of a fixed amount and due shall be established by a recovery order by which the authorising officer responsible instructs the accounting officer to recover the amount. It shall be followed by a debit note sent to the debtor, except for the cases where a waiver procedure is carried out immediately in accordance with the second subparagraph of paragraph 4. Both the recovery order and the debit note shall be drawn up by the authorising officer responsible. The authorising officer shall send the debit note immediately after establishing the amount receivable and at the latest within a period of five years from the time when the Union institution was, in normal circumstances, in a position to claim its debt. Such period shall not apply where the authorising officer responsible establishes that, despite the efforts which the Union institution has made, the delay in acting was caused by the debtor’s conduct. To establish an amount receivable the authorising officer responsible shall ensure that: (a) the amount receivable is certain, meaning that it is not subject to any condition; (b) the amount receivable is fixed, expressed precisely in cash terms; (c) the amount receivable is due and is not subject to any payment time; (d) the particulars of the debtor are correct; (e) the amount is booked to the correct budgetary item; (f) the supporting documents are in order; and The debit note shall be to inform the debtor that: (a) the Union has established the amount receivable; (b) if payment of the debt is made within the deadline, as specified in the debit note, no default interest will be due; (c) failing payment of the debt within the deadline referred to in point (b) of this subparagraph the debt shall bear interest at the rate referred to in Article 99, without any prejudice to any specific regulations applicable; (d) failing payment of the debt by the deadline referred to in point (b) the Union institution will effect recovery either by offsetting or by enforcement of any guarantee lodged in advance; (e) the accounting officer may in exceptional circumstances effect recovery by offsetting before the deadline referred to in point (b), where it is necessary to protect the financial interests of the Union when he or she has justified grounds to believe that the amount due to the Union would be lost, after the debtor has been informed of the reasons and date of the recovery by offsetting; (f) if, after taking all the steps set out in points (a) to (e) of this subparagraph, the amount has not been recovered in full, the Union institution will effect recovery by enforcement of a decision secured either in accordance with Article 100(2) or by legal action. Where following the verification of the particulars of the debtor or on the basis of other relevant information available at the time, it is clear that the debt falls under the cases referred to in point (a) or (b) of the first subparagraph of Article 101(2), or that the debit note has not been sent in accordance with paragraph 2 of this Article, the authorising officer shall, after having established the amount receivable, decide to directly waive recovery in accordance with Article 101 without sending a debit note, in agreement with the accounting officer. In all other cases, the authorising officer shall print out the debit note and send it to the debtor. The accounting officer shall be informed of the dispatch of the debit note through the financial information system. 5. Amounts wrongly paid shall be recovered.
Article 99 Default interest
1. Without prejudice to any specific provisions deriving from the application of specific regulations, any amount receivable not repaid on the deadline referred to in point (b) of the first subparagraph of Article 98(4) shall bear interest in accordance with paragraphs 2 and 3 of this Article. 2. Except in the case referred to in paragraph 4 of this Article, the interest rate for amounts receivable not repaid on the deadline referred to in point (b) of the first subparagraph of Article 98(4) shall be the rate applied by the European Central Bank to its principal refinancing operations, as published in the C series of the Official Journal of the European Union , in force on the first calendar day of the month in which the deadline falls, increased by: (a) eight percentage points where the obligating event is a supply contract or a service contract; (b) three and a half percentage points in all other cases. 3. Interest shall be calculated from the calendar day following the deadline referred to in point (b) of the first subparagraph of Article 98(4) up to the calendar day on which the debt is repaid in full. The recovery order corresponding to the amount of the default interest shall be issued when that interest is actually received. 4. In the case of fines or other penalties, the interest rate for amounts receivable not paid within the deadline referred to in point (b) of the first subparagraph of Article 98(4) shall be the rate applied by the European Central Bank to its principal refinancing operations, as published in the C series of the Official Journal of the European Union , in force on the first calendar day of the month in which the decision imposing a fine or other penalty has been adopted, increased by: (a) one and a half percentage points where the debtor provides a financial guarantee which is accepted by the accounting officer instead of payment; (b) three and a half percentage points in all other cases. Where the Court of Justice of the European Union, in the exercise of its competence under Article 261 TFEU, increases the amount of a fine or other penalty, interest on the amount of the increase shall run from the date of the judgment of the Court. 5. In cases where the overall interest rate would be negative it shall be set at zero percent.
Amendment rationale: CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL Reasons for and objectives of the proposal The Commission has been conducting borrowing and lending operations to provide financial assistance in the form of loans to a beneficiary country for several decades . The borrowing and lending operations are guaranteed under the Union’s budget and come under the wider scope of budgetary implementation. G eneral rules for such operations are laid down in Article 220 of Regulation ( EU, Euratom ) 2018/1046 1 (“Financial Regulation”) , which provides that the Commission can be empowered in a basic act to borrow on behalf of the Union or Euratom to on-lend the corresponding amounts to the beneficiary Member States or third countries under the conditions applicable to the borrowings. The cash flows between the borrowed funds and the loans are matched one-to-one. This means that market operations are based on disbursement needs, which limits the possibility to plan various borrowing operations coherently with the best market opportunities and structure maturities to achieve the best costs. The funding needs for Ukraine require mobilisation and disbursement in a cost-effective flexible and financially sound manner, integrating all funding needs including for N ext G eneration EU (“ NGEU ”) . I t is of paramount importance that this funding be organised under a single funding method in order to allow different policy needs to be met concurrently . To that end, it is necessary to amend Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 to establish the diversified funding strategy , currently implemented for borrowings under Decision (EU, Euratom) 2020/2053 2 as the baseline method for the implementation of borrowing operations. This strategy has allowed the successful mobilisation of funds for non-repayable support and loans under Regulation (EU) 2021/241 3 and a range of other EU policies in 2022. This will allow the Commission to finance the assistance to Ukraine under the proposed Regulation establishing an instrument to provide support to Ukraine 4 in a cost-efficient, flexible and financially sound manner to ensure parallel financing of all Union programmes relying on borrowing . T he extension of the scope of application of the diversified funding strategy goes beyond the funding needs for Ukraine and would be available to any future programmes . It will enable the Commission to use the infrastructure, which allows an integrated funding planning and communication to markets. In the absence of such a single funding method, the Commission would be required to continue financing different programmes of financial assistance separately. This would create cost and complexity as the different programmes of financial assistance would compete for a limited number of funding opportunities. It would fragment the supply of Union’s debt and reduce liquidity and investor interest in the separate programmes. Financing all financial assistance through a single funding method would therefore enhance the liquidity of the Union’s bonds their attractiveness and cost-effectiveness. The diversified funding strategy is a financing method through which funding transactions are organised in a manner consistent with the limits of financial liability authorised in the basic acts in order to achieve the policy objectives. The implementation of a diversified funding strategy does not change the financial liabilities arising from the borrowing. It provides the Commission with more flexibility in how the Union mobilises resources through bond issuance. Recourse to a diversified funding strategy as a single funding method will allow the Commission to decouple the timing and the maturity of single funding transactions from the disbursements to beneficiaries. A common liquidity pool financed by the issuance of short-term funding (EU-bills) enables the Commission to organise payments in accordance with a regular and agreed schedule, independently of the exact timing of the long-term bond issuance. This then allows payments to be made to beneficiaries independently of market conditions pre vailing at the time of the disbursement , and avoid s having to raise fixed amounts in volatile o r adverse conditions. Over the life time of the programme of financial assistance , the net liabilities generated are fully matched by countervailing assets ( amounts outstanding, still to be repaid under loans as they mature 5 ) . On this basis, the principles of budgetary neutrality and budgetary balance as set out in Article 310(1) TFEU are respected. The costs are fully borne by the beneficiaries based on a single cost allocation methodology that ensures transparent and proportional allocation of costs . The repayment obligations should remain with the beneficiaries of the financial assistance, in compliance with Article 220(5)(e) of the Financial Regulation. The common liquidity pool should be maintained at levels that would allow the Commission to meet all expected outflows over the short-term, based on a robust liquidity forecasting capacity. The existence of a large, well-stocked liquidity buffer, capable of managing disbursements over long periods, allows the diversified funding strategy to function without the need for other solutions to address temporary cash shortfalls. To support the most successful implementation of the diversified funding strategy, the Commission should, as far as possible, ensure a continuous market presence and to this end implement all necessary transactions aiming at achieving the best possible funding costs and at facilitating of transactions in debt securities of the Union and Euratom. The latter is crucial in supporting the active involvement of the widest range of investors to markets for Union’s debt instruments. The conduct of the diversified funding strategy requires that a single set of rules is followed in respect of all borrowing and lending programmes which rely on it. The Financial Regulation in its role of a single rulebook for the implementation of the EU budget should provide the basis for those rules. Following the entry into force of this amendment of the Financial Regulation, the Commission will adopt and implement a wider governance framework, risk management procedures, and cost allocation methodology. These new rules of the Financial Regulation should only apply to new financial assistance to third countries for which the basic acts enter into force on or after the date of entry into force of these amendments of the Financial Regulation and the parallel amendment of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2020/2093. The Commission proposed a recast of the Financial Regulation 6 that is being examined by the European Parliament and the Council. The present stand-alone proposal should be adopted as a matter of urgency and the changes incorporated in the pending recast during the legislative process . Consistency with existing policy provisions in the policy area The diversified funding strategy has been introduced for NGEU borrowing and has proven successful so far in that context. Consistency with other Union policies The diversified funding strategy will allow efficient use of borrowing capacity for Union policies which may make use of borrowing and lending operations.

EUROPEAN COMMISSIONBrussels, 9.11.2022COM(2022) 596 final2022/0370(COD)Proposal for aREGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCILamending Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 as regards the establishment of a diversified funding strategy as a general borrowing methodEXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM1.CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL•Reasons for and objectives of the proposalTheCommission has been conducting borrowing and lending operationsto providefinancial assistance in the form of loansto a beneficiary countryfor several decades. Theborrowing and lending operations are guaranteed under the Union’s budget and come under the wider scope of budgetary implementation. General rules for such operations are laid down in Article 220 of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/10461(“Financial Regulation”),whichprovides that the Commissioncan be empowered in a basic act to borrowon behalf of the Union or Euratom to on-lend the corresponding amounts to the beneficiary Member States or third countries under the conditions applicable to the borrowings.The cash flows between theborrowed funds and the loans are matched one-to-one. This means that market operationsarebased on disbursement needs, which limits the possibility to plan various borrowing operationscoherently withthe best market opportunities and structure maturities to achieve the best costs.Thefundingneedsfor Ukrainerequire mobilisation and disbursementin a cost-effectiveflexible and financially soundmanner,integrating allfundingneeds includingforNextGenerationEU(“NGEU”).It is of paramount importance that this funding beorganised underasingle funding methodin order to allow different policy needs to be metconcurrently.To that end, it is necessary to amend Regulation (EU, Euratom)2018/1046 to establish the diversified funding strategy,currently implemented for borrowings underDecision (EU, Euratom) 2020/20532as the baseline method fortheimplementation of borrowing operations.This strategy has allowed the successful mobilisation of funds fornon-repayable supportand loans under Regulation (EU) 2021/2413and a range of other EU policies in 2022.Thiswill allowtheCommissionto finance the assistance toUkraineunder the proposedRegulation establishing an instrumentto providesupport to Ukraine4in a cost-efficient, flexible and financially sound mannerto ensureparallelfinancingof all Unionprogrammesrelying on borrowing.The extension of the scope of application of the diversified funding strategy goes beyond the funding needs for Ukraineand would be available to any future programmes. It willenablethe Commission to use the infrastructure,which allowsan integrated funding planning and communication to markets.In the absence of such a single funding method, the Commission would be required to continue financing different programmes of financial assistance separately. This would create cost and complexity as the different programmes of financial assistance would compete for a limited number of funding opportunities. It would fragment the supply of Union’s debt and reduce liquidity and investor interest in the separate programmes. Financing all financial assistance through a single funding method would therefore enhance the liquidity of the Union’s bonds their attractiveness and cost-effectiveness.The diversified funding strategy is a financing method through which funding transactions are organised in a manner consistent with the limits of financial liability authorised in the basic acts in order to achieve the policy objectives. The implementation of a diversified funding strategy does not change the financial liabilities arising from the borrowing. It provides the Commission with more flexibility in how the Union mobilisesresources through bond issuance.Recourse to adiversified funding strategyas asingle fundingmethodwill allow theCommissionto decouple the timingand the maturityof single funding transactions from the disbursements to beneficiaries.A common liquidity pool financed by the issuance of short-term funding (EU-bills) enables the Commission to organise payments in accordance with a regular and agreed schedule, independently of the exact timing of the long-term bond issuance. This thenallowspayments tobe made tobeneficiaries independently of market conditionsprevailingat the time of the disbursement, and avoidshaving to raise fixed amounts in volatile oradverse conditions.Over the lifetimeof theprogramme offinancial assistance,thenetliabilities generated are fully matched by countervailing assets (amounts outstanding, still to be repaid underloans as they mature5).On this basis,the principles of budgetary neutrality and budgetary balance as set out in Article 310(1) TFEU are respected. The costs are fully borne by the beneficiaries based on a single cost allocation methodology that ensures transparent andproportionalallocation of costs.The repayment obligations should remain with the beneficiaries of the financial assistance, in compliance with Article 220(5)(e) of the Financial Regulation.The common liquidity pool should be maintained at levels that would allow the Commission to meet all expected outflows over the short-term, based on a robust liquidity forecasting capacity. The existence of a large, well-stocked liquidity buffer, capable of managing disbursements over long periods, allows the diversified funding strategy to function without the need for other solutions to address temporary cash shortfalls.To support the most successful implementation of the diversified funding strategy, the Commission should, as far as possible, ensure a continuous market presence and to this end implement all necessary transactions aiming at achieving the best possible funding costs and at facilitating of transactions in debt securities of the Union and Euratom. The latter is crucial in supporting the active involvement of the widest range of investors to markets for Union’s debt instruments.The conduct of the diversified funding strategy requires that a single set of rules is followed in respect of all borrowing and lending programmes which rely on it. The Financial Regulation in its role of a single rulebook for the implementation of the EU budget should provide the basis for those rules.Following the entry into force of this amendment of the Financial Regulation, the Commission will adopt and implement a wider governance framework, risk management procedures, and cost allocation methodology.These new rules of the Financial Regulation should only apply to new financial assistance to third countries for which the basic acts enter into force on or after the date of entry into force of these amendments of the Financial Regulation and the parallel amendment of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2020/2093.The Commission proposed a recast of the Financial Regulation6that is being examined by the European Parliament and the Council. The present stand-alone proposal should be adopted as a matter of urgency andthe changes incorporated in the pending recast during the legislative process.
Revised version (Article 99 Default interest):
1. Without prejudice to any specific provisions deriving from the application of specific regulations, any amount receivable not repaid on the deadline referred to in point (b) of the first subparagraph of Article 98(4) shall bear interest in accordance with paragraphs 2 and 3 of this Article. 2. Except in the case referred to in paragraph 4 of this Article, the interest rate for amounts receivable not repaid on the deadline referred to in point (b) of the first subparagraph of Article 98(4) shall be the rate applied by the European Central Bank to its principal refinancing operations, as published in the C series of the Official Journal of the European Union , in force on the first calendar day of the month in which the deadline falls, increased by: (a) eight percentage points where the obligating event is a supply contract or a service contract; (b) three and a half percentage points in all other cases. 3. Interest shall be calculated from the calendar day following the deadline referred to in point (b) of the first subparagraph of Article 98(4) up to the calendar day on which the debt is repaid in full. The recovery order corresponding to the amount of the default interest shall be issued when that interest is actually received. In the case of fines or other penalties, the interest rate for amounts receivable not paid within the deadline referred to in point (b) of the first subparagraph of Article 98(4) shall be the rate applied by the European Central Bank to its principal refinancing operations, as published in the C series of the Official Journal of the European Union , in force on the first calendar day of the month in which the decision imposing a fine or other penalty has been adopted, increased by: (a) one and a half percentage points where the debtor provides a financial guarantee which is accepted by the accounting officer instead of payment; Where the Court of Justice of the European Union, in the exercise of its competence under Article 261 TFEU, increases the amount of a fine or other penalty, interest on the amount of the increase shall run from the date of the judgment of the Court. 5. In cases where the overall interest rate would be negative it shall be set at zero percent.
Article 100 Authorisation of recovery
1. The authorising officer responsible shall, by issuing a recovery order, instruct the accounting officer to recover an amount receivable which that authorising officer responsible has established (‘the authorisation of recovery’). 2. A Union institution may formally establish an amount as being receivable from persons other than Member States by means of a decision which shall be enforceable within the meaning of Article 299 TFEU. If the efficient and timely protection of the financial interests of the Union so requires, other Union institutions may, in exceptional circumstances, request the Commission to adopt such an enforceable decision for their benefit with respect to claims arising in relation to staff or in relation to members or former members of a Union institution, provided that those institutions have agreed with the Commission on the practical modalities for the application of this Article. Such exceptional circumstances shall be deemed to exist when there is no prospect of recovery of the debt by the Union institution concerned by means of a voluntary payment or by means of offsetting as provided for in Article 101(1) and the conditions for waiving the recovery under Article 101(2) and (3) are not met. In all cases, the enforceable decision shall specify that the amounts claimed shall be entered in the section of the budget relating to the Union institution concerned, which shall act as authorising officer. The revenue shall be entered as general revenue except if it constitutes assigned revenue as provided for in Article 21(3). The requesting Union institution shall inform the Commission of any event likely to alter the recovery and shall intervene in support of the Commission in the event of an appeal against the enforceable decision.
Article 101 Rules on recovery
1. The accounting officer shall act on recovery orders for amounts receivable duly established by the authorising officer responsible. The accounting officer shall exercise due diligence to ensure that the Union receives its revenue and shall ensure that the Union’s rights are safeguarded. Partial reimbursement by a debtor who is subject to several recovery orders shall first be posted on the oldest entitlement unless otherwise specified by the debtor. Any partial payments shall first cover the interest. The accounting officer shall recover amounts due to the budget by offsetting them in accordance with Article 102. 2. The authorising officer responsible may waive recovery of all or part of an established amount receivable only in the following cases: (a) where the foreseeable cost of recovery would exceed the amount to be recovered and the waiver would not harm the image of the Union; (b) where the amount receivable cannot be recovered in view of its age, of delay in the dispatch of the debit note in the terms defined in Article 98(2), of the insolvency of the debtor, or of any other insolvency proceedings; (c) where recovery is inconsistent with the principle of proportionality. Where the authorising officer responsible plans to waive or partially waive recovery of an established amount receivable, he or she shall ensure that the waiver is in order and is in accordance with the principles of sound financial management and proportionality. The decision to waive recovery shall be substantiated. The authorising officer may delegate the power to take that decision. 3. In the case referred to in point (c) of the first subparagraph of paragraph 2, the authorising officer responsible shall act in accordance with predetermined procedures established within his or her Union institution and shall apply the following criteria which are compulsory and applicable in all circumstances: (a) the facts, having regard to the gravity of the irregularity giving rise to the establishment of the amount receivable (fraud, repeated offence, intent, diligence, good faith, manifest error); (b) the impact that waiving recovery would have on the operation of the Union and its financial interests (amount involved, risk of setting a precedent, undermining of the authority of the law). 4. Depending on the circumstances of the case, the authorising officer responsible shall, where appropriate, take the following additional criteria into account: (a) any distortion of competition that would be caused by the waiving of recovery; (b) the economic and social damage that would be caused were the debt to be recovered in full. 5. Each Union institution shall send to the European Parliament and to the Council each year a report on the waivers granted by it pursuant to paragraphs 2, 3 and 4 of this Article. Information on waivers below EUR 60 000 shall be provided as a total amount. In the case of the Commission, that report shall be annexed to the summary of the annual activity reports referred to in Article 74(9). 6. The authorising officer responsible may cancel an established amount receivable in full or in part. The partial cancellation of an established amount receivable does not imply the waiver of the remaining established Union entitlement. In the event of a mistake, the authorising officer responsible shall cancel totally or partially the established amount receivable and include adequate reasons. Each Union institution shall in its internal rules lay down the conditions and procedure for delegating the power to cancel an established amount receivable. 7. Member States shall have primary responsibility for carrying out controls and audits and for recovering amounts unduly spent, as provided for in sector-specific rules. To the extent that Member States detect and correct irregularities on their own account, they shall be exempt from financial corrections by the Commission concerning those irregularities. 8. The Commission shall make financial corrections on Member States in order to exclude expenditure incurred in breach of applicable law from Union financing. The Commission shall base its financial corrections on the identification of amounts unduly spent, and the financial implications for the budget. Where such amounts cannot be identified precisely, the Commission may apply extrapolated or flat-rate corrections in accordance with sector-specific rules. The Commission shall, when deciding on the amount of a financial correction, take account of the nature and gravity of the breach of applicable law and the financial implications for the budget, including deficiencies in management and control systems. The criteria for establishing financial corrections and the procedure to be followed may be laid down in sector-specific rules. 9. The methodology for applying extrapolated or flat-rate corrections shall be laid down in accordance with sector-specific rules with a view to enabling the Commission to protect the financial interests of the Union.
Amendment rationale: CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL Reasons for and objectives of the proposal The Commission has been conducting borrowing and lending operations to provide financial assistance in the form of loans to a beneficiary country for several decades . The borrowing and lending operations are guaranteed under the Union’s budget and come under the wider scope of budgetary implementation. G eneral rules for such operations are laid down in Article 220 of Regulation ( EU, Euratom ) 2018/1046 1 (“Financial Regulation”) , which provides that the Commission can be empowered in a basic act to borrow on behalf of the Union or Euratom to on-lend the corresponding amounts to the beneficiary Member States or third countries under the conditions applicable to the borrowings. The cash flows between the borrowed funds and the loans are matched one-to-one. This means that market operations are based on disbursement needs, which limits the possibility to plan various borrowing operations coherently with the best market opportunities and structure maturities to achieve the best costs. The funding needs for Ukraine require mobilisation and disbursement in a cost-effective flexible and financially sound manner, integrating all funding needs including for N ext G eneration EU (“ NGEU ”) . I t is of paramount importance that this funding be organised under a single funding method in order to allow different policy needs to be met concurrently . To that end, it is necessary to amend Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 to establish the diversified funding strategy , currently implemented for borrowings under Decision (EU, Euratom) 2020/2053 2 as the baseline method for the implementation of borrowing operations. This strategy has allowed the successful mobilisation of funds for non-repayable support and loans under Regulation (EU) 2021/241 3 and a range of other EU policies in 2022. This will allow the Commission to finance the assistance to Ukraine under the proposed Regulation establishing an instrument to provide support to Ukraine 4 in a cost-efficient, flexible and financially sound manner to ensure parallel financing of all Union programmes relying on borrowing . T he extension of the scope of application of the diversified funding strategy goes beyond the funding needs for Ukraine and would be available to any future programmes . It will enable the Commission to use the infrastructure, which allows an integrated funding planning and communication to markets. In the absence of such a single funding method, the Commission would be required to continue financing different programmes of financial assistance separately. This would create cost and complexity as the different programmes of financial assistance would compete for a limited number of funding opportunities. It would fragment the supply of Union’s debt and reduce liquidity and investor interest in the separate programmes. Financing all financial assistance through a single funding method would therefore enhance the liquidity of the Union’s bonds their attractiveness and cost-effectiveness. The diversified funding strategy is a financing method through which funding transactions are organised in a manner consistent with the limits of financial liability authorised in the basic acts in order to achieve the policy objectives. The implementation of a diversified funding strategy does not change the financial liabilities arising from the borrowing. It provides the Commission with more flexibility in how the Union mobilises resources through bond issuance. Recourse to a diversified funding strategy as a single funding method will allow the Commission to decouple the timing and the maturity of single funding transactions from the disbursements to beneficiaries. A common liquidity pool financed by the issuance of short-term funding (EU-bills) enables the Commission to organise payments in accordance with a regular and agreed schedule, independently of the exact timing of the long-term bond issuance. This then allows payments to be made to beneficiaries independently of market conditions pre vailing at the time of the disbursement , and avoid s having to raise fixed amounts in volatile o r adverse conditions. Over the life time of the programme of financial assistance , the net liabilities generated are fully matched by countervailing assets ( amounts outstanding, still to be repaid under loans as they mature 5 ) . On this basis, the principles of budgetary neutrality and budgetary balance as set out in Article 310(1) TFEU are respected. The costs are fully borne by the beneficiaries based on a single cost allocation methodology that ensures transparent and proportional allocation of costs . The repayment obligations should remain with the beneficiaries of the financial assistance, in compliance with Article 220(5)(e) of the Financial Regulation. The common liquidity pool should be maintained at levels that would allow the Commission to meet all expected outflows over the short-term, based on a robust liquidity forecasting capacity. The existence of a large, well-stocked liquidity buffer, capable of managing disbursements over long periods, allows the diversified funding strategy to function without the need for other solutions to address temporary cash shortfalls. To support the most successful implementation of the diversified funding strategy, the Commission should, as far as possible, ensure a continuous market presence and to this end implement all necessary transactions aiming at achieving the best possible funding costs and at facilitating of transactions in debt securities of the Union and Euratom. The latter is crucial in supporting the active involvement of the widest range of investors to markets for Union’s debt instruments. The conduct of the diversified funding strategy requires that a single set of rules is followed in respect of all borrowing and lending programmes which rely on it. The Financial Regulation in its role of a single rulebook for the implementation of the EU budget should provide the basis for those rules. Following the entry into force of this amendment of the Financial Regulation, the Commission will adopt and implement a wider governance framework, risk management procedures, and cost allocation methodology. These new rules of the Financial Regulation should only apply to new financial assistance to third countries for which the basic acts enter into force on or after the date of entry into force of these amendments of the Financial Regulation and the parallel amendment of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2020/2093. The Commission proposed a recast of the Financial Regulation 6 that is being examined by the European Parliament and the Council. The present stand-alone proposal should be adopted as a matter of urgency and the changes incorporated in the pending recast during the legislative process . Consistency with existing policy provisions in the policy area The diversified funding strategy has been introduced for NGEU borrowing and has proven successful so far in that context. Consistency with other Union policies The diversified funding strategy will allow efficient use of borrowing capacity for Union policies which may make use of borrowing and lending operations.

EUROPEAN COMMISSIONBrussels, 9.11.2022COM(2022) 596 final2022/0370(COD)Proposal for aREGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCILamending Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 as regards the establishment of a diversified funding strategy as a general borrowing methodEXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM1.CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL•Reasons for and objectives of the proposalTheCommission has been conducting borrowing and lending operationsto providefinancial assistance in the form of loansto a beneficiary countryfor several decades. Theborrowing and lending operations are guaranteed under the Union’s budget and come under the wider scope of budgetary implementation. General rules for such operations are laid down in Article 220 of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/10461(“Financial Regulation”),whichprovides that the Commissioncan be empowered in a basic act to borrowon behalf of the Union or Euratom to on-lend the corresponding amounts to the beneficiary Member States or third countries under the conditions applicable to the borrowings.The cash flows between theborrowed funds and the loans are matched one-to-one. This means that market operationsarebased on disbursement needs, which limits the possibility to plan various borrowing operationscoherently withthe best market opportunities and structure maturities to achieve the best costs.Thefundingneedsfor Ukrainerequire mobilisation and disbursementin a cost-effectiveflexible and financially soundmanner,integrating allfundingneeds includingforNextGenerationEU(“NGEU”).It is of paramount importance that this funding beorganised underasingle funding methodin order to allow different policy needs to be metconcurrently.To that end, it is necessary to amend Regulation (EU, Euratom)2018/1046 to establish the diversified funding strategy,currently implemented for borrowings underDecision (EU, Euratom) 2020/20532as the baseline method fortheimplementation of borrowing operations.This strategy has allowed the successful mobilisation of funds fornon-repayable supportand loans under Regulation (EU) 2021/2413and a range of other EU policies in 2022.Thiswill allowtheCommissionto finance the assistance toUkraineunder the proposedRegulation establishing an instrumentto providesupport to Ukraine4in a cost-efficient, flexible and financially sound mannerto ensureparallelfinancingof all Unionprogrammesrelying on borrowing.The extension of the scope of application of the diversified funding strategy goes beyond the funding needs for Ukraineand would be available to any future programmes. It willenablethe Commission to use the infrastructure,which allowsan integrated funding planning and communication to markets.In the absence of such a single funding method, the Commission would be required to continue financing different programmes of financial assistance separately. This would create cost and complexity as the different programmes of financial assistance would compete for a limited number of funding opportunities. It would fragment the supply of Union’s debt and reduce liquidity and investor interest in the separate programmes. Financing all financial assistance through a single funding method would therefore enhance the liquidity of the Union’s bonds their attractiveness and cost-effectiveness.The diversified funding strategy is a financing method through which funding transactions are organised in a manner consistent with the limits of financial liability authorised in the basic acts in order to achieve the policy objectives. The implementation of a diversified funding strategy does not change the financial liabilities arising from the borrowing. It provides the Commission with more flexibility in how the Union mobilisesresources through bond issuance.Recourse to adiversified funding strategyas asingle fundingmethodwill allow theCommissionto decouple the timingand the maturityof single funding transactions from the disbursements to beneficiaries.A common liquidity pool financed by the issuance of short-term funding (EU-bills) enables the Commission to organise payments in accordance with a regular and agreed schedule, independently of the exact timing of the long-term bond issuance. This thenallowspayments tobe made tobeneficiaries independently of market conditionsprevailingat the time of the disbursement, and avoidshaving to raise fixed amounts in volatile oradverse conditions.Over the lifetimeof theprogramme offinancial assistance,thenetliabilities generated are fully matched by countervailing assets (amounts outstanding, still to be repaid underloans as they mature5).On this basis,the principles of budgetary neutrality and budgetary balance as set out in Article 310(1) TFEU are respected. The costs are fully borne by the beneficiaries based on a single cost allocation methodology that ensures transparent andproportionalallocation of costs.The repayment obligations should remain with the beneficiaries of the financial assistance, in compliance with Article 220(5)(e) of the Financial Regulation.The common liquidity pool should be maintained at levels that would allow the Commission to meet all expected outflows over the short-term, based on a robust liquidity forecasting capacity. The existence of a large, well-stocked liquidity buffer, capable of managing disbursements over long periods, allows the diversified funding strategy to function without the need for other solutions to address temporary cash shortfalls.To support the most successful implementation of the diversified funding strategy, the Commission should, as far as possible, ensure a continuous market presence and to this end implement all necessary transactions aiming at achieving the best possible funding costs and at facilitating of transactions in debt securities of the Union and Euratom. The latter is crucial in supporting the active involvement of the widest range of investors to markets for Union’s debt instruments.The conduct of the diversified funding strategy requires that a single set of rules is followed in respect of all borrowing and lending programmes which rely on it. The Financial Regulation in its role of a single rulebook for the implementation of the EU budget should provide the basis for those rules.Following the entry into force of this amendment of the Financial Regulation, the Commission will adopt and implement a wider governance framework, risk management procedures, and cost allocation methodology.These new rules of the Financial Regulation should only apply to new financial assistance to third countries for which the basic acts enter into force on or after the date of entry into force of these amendments of the Financial Regulation and the parallel amendment of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2020/2093.The Commission proposed a recast of the Financial Regulation6that is being examined by the European Parliament and the Council. The present stand-alone proposal should be adopted as a matter of urgency andthe changes incorporated in the pending recast during the legislative process.
Revised version (Article 101 Rules on recovery):
1. The accounting officer shall act on recovery orders for amounts receivable duly established by the authorising officer responsible. The accounting officer shall exercise due diligence to ensure that the Union receives its revenue and shall ensure that the Union’s rights are safeguarded. Partial reimbursement by a debtor who is subject to several recovery orders shall first be posted on the oldest entitlement unless otherwise specified by the debtor. Any partial payments shall first cover the interest. The accounting officer shall recover amounts due to the budget by offsetting them in accordance with Article 102. The authorising officer responsible may waive recovery of all or part of an established amount receivable only in the following cases: (a) where the foreseeable cost of recovery would exceed the amount to be recovered and the waiver would not harm the image of the Union; (b) where the amount receivable cannot be recovered in view of its age, of delay in the dispatch of the debit note in the terms defined in Article 98(2), of the insolvency of the debtor, or of any other insolvency proceedings; (c) where recovery is inconsistent with the principle of proportionality. Where the authorising officer responsible plans to waive or partially waive recovery of an established amount receivable, he or she shall ensure that the waiver is in order and is in accordance with the principles of sound financial management and proportionality. The decision to waive recovery shall be substantiated. The authorising officer may delegate the power to take that decision. In the case referred to in point (c) of the first subparagraph of paragraph 2, the authorising officer responsible shall act in accordance with predetermined procedures established within his or her Union institution and shall apply the following criteria which are compulsory and applicable in all circumstances: (a) the facts, having regard to the gravity of the irregularity giving rise to the establishment of the amount receivable (fraud, repeated offence, intent, diligence, good faith, manifest error); (b) the impact that waiving recovery would have on the operation of the Union and its financial interests (amount involved, risk of setting a precedent, undermining of the authority of the law). 4. Depending on the circumstances of the case, the authorising officer responsible shall, where appropriate, take the following additional criteria into account: (a) any distortion of competition that would be caused by the waiving of recovery; (b) the economic and social damage that would be caused were the debt to be recovered in full. Depending on the circumstances of the case, the authorising officer responsible shall, where appropriate, take the following additional criteria into account: (a) any distortion of competition that would be caused by the waiving of recovery; (b) the economic and social damage that would be caused were the debt to be recovered in full. 5. Each Union institution shall send to the European Parliament and to the Council each year a report on the waivers granted by it pursuant to paragraphs 2, 3 and 4 of this Article. Information on waivers below EUR 60 000 shall be provided as a total amount. In the case of the Commission, that report shall be annexed to the summary of the annual activity reports referred to in Article 74(9). 6. The authorising officer responsible may cancel an established amount receivable in full or in part. The partial cancellation of an established amount receivable does not imply the waiver of the remaining established Union entitlement. In the event of a mistake, the authorising officer responsible shall cancel totally or partially the established amount receivable and include adequate reasons. Each Union institution shall in its internal rules lay down the conditions and procedure for delegating the power to cancel an established amount receivable. 7. Member States shall have primary responsibility for carrying out controls and audits and for recovering amounts unduly spent, as provided for in sector-specific rules. To the extent that Member States detect and correct irregularities on their own account, they shall be exempt from financial corrections by the Commission concerning those irregularities. 8. The Commission shall make financial corrections on Member States in order to exclude expenditure incurred in breach of applicable law from Union financing. The Commission shall base its financial corrections on the identification of amounts unduly spent, and the financial implications for the budget. Where such amounts cannot be identified precisely, the Commission may apply extrapolated or flat-rate corrections in accordance with sector-specific rules. The Commission shall, when deciding on the amount of a financial correction, take account of the nature and gravity of the breach of applicable law and the financial implications for the budget, including deficiencies in management and control systems. The criteria for establishing financial corrections and the procedure to be followed may be laid down in sector-specific rules. 9. The methodology for applying extrapolated or flat-rate corrections shall be laid down in accordance with sector-specific rules with a view to enabling the Commission to protect the financial interests of the Union.
Article 102 Recovery by offsetting
1. Where the debtor has a claim on the Union, or on an executive agency when it implements the budget, that is certain within the meaning of point (a) of Article 98(3), of a fixed amount and due relating to a sum established by a payment order, the accounting officer shall, after expiry of the deadline referred to in point (b) of the first subparagraph of Article 98(4), recover established amounts receivable by offsetting. In exceptional circumstances, where it is necessary to safeguard the financial interests of the Union and where the accounting officer has justified grounds to believe that the amount due to the Union would be lost, the accounting officer may recover by offsetting before the expiry of the deadline referred to in point (b) of the first subparagraph of Article 98(4). The accounting officer may also recover by offsetting before the expiry of the deadline referred to in point (b) of first subparagraph of Article 98(4) when the debtor agrees. 2. Before proceeding with any recovery in accordance with paragraph 1 of this Article, the accounting officer shall consult the authorising officer responsible and inform the debtors concerned, including of the means of redress in accordance with Article 133. Where the debtor is a national authority or one of its administrative entities, the accounting officer shall also inform the Member State concerned of his or her intention to resort to recovery by offsetting at least 10 working days in advance of proceeding with it. However, in agreement with the Member State or administrative entity concerned, the accounting officer may proceed with the recovery by offsetting before that deadline has passed. 3. The offsetting referred to in paragraph 1 shall have the same effect as a payment and discharge the Union for the amount of the debt and, where appropriate, of the interest due.
Article 103 Recovery procedure failing voluntary payment
1. Without prejudice to Article 102, if the full amount has not been recovered by the deadline referred to in point (b) of the first subparagraph of Article 98(4), the accounting officer shall inform the authorising officer responsible and shall without delay launch the procedure for effecting recovery by any means offered by the law, including, where appropriate, by enforcement of any guarantee lodged in advance. 2. Without prejudice to Article 102, where the recovery method referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article cannot be used and the debtor has failed to pay in response to a letter of formal notice sent by the accounting officer, the accounting officer shall effect recovery by enforcement of a decision secured either in accordance with Article 100(2) or by legal action.
Article 104 Additional time for payment
The accounting officer may, in collaboration with the authorising officer responsible, allow additional time for payment only at the written request of the debtor, with due indication of the reasons, and provided that the following conditions are fulfilled: (a) the debtor undertakes to pay interest at the rate specified in Article 99 for the entire additional period allowed, starting from the deadline referred to in point (b) of the first subparagraph of Article 98(4); (b) in order to safeguard the rights of the Union, the debtor lodges a financial guarantee covering the debt outstanding in both the principal sum and the interest, which is accepted by the accounting officer of the Union institution. The guarantee referred to in point (b) of the first paragraph may be replaced by a joint and several guarantee by a third party approved by the accounting officer of the Union institution. In exceptional circumstances, following a request by the debtor, the accounting officer may waive the requirement of a guarantee referred to in point (b) of the first paragraph when, on the basis of his or her assessment, the debtor is willing and able to make the payment in the additional time period but is not able to lodge such guarantee and is in a situation of financial distress.
Article 105 Limitation period
1. Without prejudice to the provisions of specific regulations and the application of Decision 2014/335/EU, Euratom, entitlements of the Union in respect of third parties and entitlements of third parties in respect of the Union shall be subject to a limitation period of five years. 2. The limitation period for entitlements of the Union in respect of third parties shall begin to run on the expiry of the deadline referred to in point (b) of the first subparagraph of Article 98(4). The limitation period for entitlements of third parties in respect of the Union shall begin to run on the date on which the payment of the third party’s entitlement is due according to the corresponding legal commitment. 3. The limitation period for entitlements of the Union in respect of third parties shall be interrupted by any act of a Union institution or a Member State acting at the request of a Union institution, notified to the third party and aiming at recovering the debt. The limitation period for entitlements of third parties in respect of the Union shall be interrupted by any act notified to the Union by its creditors or on behalf of its creditors aiming at recovering the debt. 4. A new limitation period of five years shall begin to run on the day following the interruptions referred to in paragraph 3. 5. Any legal action relating to an entitlement as referred to in paragraph 2, including actions brought before a court which later declares itself not to have jurisdiction, shall interrupt the limitation period. A new limitation period of five years shall not begin to run until a judgment having the force of res judicata is given or there is an extrajudicial settlement between the same parties on the same action. 6. Where the accounting officer allows the debtor additional time for payment in accordance with Article 104, this shall be considered as an interruption of the limitation period. A new limitation period of five years shall begin to run on the day following the expiry of the extended time for payment. 7. Entitlements of the Union shall not be recovered after the expiry of the limitation period, as provided for in paragraphs 2 to 6.
Article 106 National treatment for entitlements of the Union
In the event of insolvency proceedings, entitlements of the Union shall be given the same preferential treatment as entitlements of the same nature due to public bodies in Member States where the recovery proceedings are being conducted.
Article 107 Fines, other penalties, sanctions and accrued interest imposed by Union institutions
1. Amounts received by way of fines, other penalties and sanctions, and any accrued interest or other income generated by them, shall not be entered in the budget as long as the decisions imposing them are or could still become subject to an appeal before the Court of Justice of the European Union. 2. The amounts referred to in paragraph 1 shall be entered in the budget as soon as possible following the exhaustion of all legal remedies. Under duly justified exceptional circumstances or where the exhaustion of all legal remedies occurs after 1 September of the current financial year, the amounts may be entered in the budget in the following financial year. Amounts that are to be returned to the entity that paid them, following a judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union, shall not be entered in the budget. 3. Paragraph 1 shall not apply to decisions on clearance of accounts or financial corrections.
Article 108 Recovery of fines, other penalties or sanctions imposed by Union institutions
1. Where an action is brought before the Court of Justice of the European Union against a decision of a Union institution imposing a fine, other penalty or sanction under the TFEU or the Euratom Treaty and until such time as all legal remedies have been exhausted, the debtor shall either provisionally pay the amounts concerned on the bank account designated by the accounting officer of the Commission or lodge a financial guarantee acceptable to the accounting officer of the Commission. The guarantee shall be independent of the obligation to pay the fine, other penalty or sanction and shall be enforceable on demand. It shall cover the claim as to principal and the interest due as specified in Article 99(4). 2. The Commission shall secure the provisionally collected amounts by having them invested in financial assets, thereby ensuring the security and liquidity of the monies whilst also aiming at yielding a positive return. 3. After the exhaustion of all legal remedies and where the fine, other penalty or sanction has been confirmed by the Court of Justice of the European Union, or where the decision imposing such a fine, other penalty or sanction may no longer become subject to an appeal before the Court of Justice of the European Union, one of the following measures shall be taken: (a) the provisionally collected amounts and the return on them shall be entered in the budget in accordance with Article 107(2); (b) where a financial guarantee has been lodged, it shall be enforced and the corresponding amounts entered in the budget. Where the amount of the fine, other penalty or sanction has been increased by the Court of Justice of the European Union, points (a) and (b) of the first subparagraph of this paragraph shall apply up to the amounts of the original decision of the Union institution or, if applicable, to the amount laid down in a former judgment by the Court of Justice of the European Union in the same proceedings. The accounting officer of the Commission shall collect the amount corresponding to the increase and the interest due as specified in Article 99(4), which shall be entered in the budget. 4. After all legal remedies have been exhausted and where the fine, other penalty or sanction has been cancelled or the amount has been reduced, one of the following measures shall be taken: (a) the provisionally collected amounts or, in the event of a reduction, the relevant part thereof, including any return, shall be repaid to the third party concerned; (b) where a financial guarantee has been lodged, it shall be released accordingly. In the cases referred to in point (a) of the first subparagraph, where the overall return on the provisionally collected amount is negative, the loss incurred shall be deducted from the amount to be repaid.
Amendment rationale: CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL Reasons for and objectives of the proposal The Commission has been conducting borrowing and lending operations to provide financial assistance in the form of loans to a beneficiary country for several decades . The borrowing and lending operations are guaranteed under the Union’s budget and come under the wider scope of budgetary implementation. G eneral rules for such operations are laid down in Article 220 of Regulation ( EU, Euratom ) 2018/1046 1 (“Financial Regulation”) , which provides that the Commission can be empowered in a basic act to borrow on behalf of the Union or Euratom to on-lend the corresponding amounts to the beneficiary Member States or third countries under the conditions applicable to the borrowings. The cash flows between the borrowed funds and the loans are matched one-to-one. This means that market operations are based on disbursement needs, which limits the possibility to plan various borrowing operations coherently with the best market opportunities and structure maturities to achieve the best costs. The funding needs for Ukraine require mobilisation and disbursement in a cost-effective flexible and financially sound manner, integrating all funding needs including for N ext G eneration EU (“ NGEU ”) . I t is of paramount importance that this funding be organised under a single funding method in order to allow different policy needs to be met concurrently . To that end, it is necessary to amend Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 to establish the diversified funding strategy , currently implemented for borrowings under Decision (EU, Euratom) 2020/2053 2 as the baseline method for the implementation of borrowing operations. This strategy has allowed the successful mobilisation of funds for non-repayable support and loans under Regulation (EU) 2021/241 3 and a range of other EU policies in 2022. This will allow the Commission to finance the assistance to Ukraine under the proposed Regulation establishing an instrument to provide support to Ukraine 4 in a cost-efficient, flexible and financially sound manner to ensure parallel financing of all Union programmes relying on borrowing . T he extension of the scope of application of the diversified funding strategy goes beyond the funding needs for Ukraine and would be available to any future programmes . It will enable the Commission to use the infrastructure, which allows an integrated funding planning and communication to markets. In the absence of such a single funding method, the Commission would be required to continue financing different programmes of financial assistance separately. This would create cost and complexity as the different programmes of financial assistance would compete for a limited number of funding opportunities. It would fragment the supply of Union’s debt and reduce liquidity and investor interest in the separate programmes. Financing all financial assistance through a single funding method would therefore enhance the liquidity of the Union’s bonds their attractiveness and cost-effectiveness. The diversified funding strategy is a financing method through which funding transactions are organised in a manner consistent with the limits of financial liability authorised in the basic acts in order to achieve the policy objectives. The implementation of a diversified funding strategy does not change the financial liabilities arising from the borrowing. It provides the Commission with more flexibility in how the Union mobilises resources through bond issuance. Recourse to a diversified funding strategy as a single funding method will allow the Commission to decouple the timing and the maturity of single funding transactions from the disbursements to beneficiaries. A common liquidity pool financed by the issuance of short-term funding (EU-bills) enables the Commission to organise payments in accordance with a regular and agreed schedule, independently of the exact timing of the long-term bond issuance. This then allows payments to be made to beneficiaries independently of market conditions pre vailing at the time of the disbursement , and avoid s having to raise fixed amounts in volatile o r adverse conditions. Over the life time of the programme of financial assistance , the net liabilities generated are fully matched by countervailing assets ( amounts outstanding, still to be repaid under loans as they mature 5 ) . On this basis, the principles of budgetary neutrality and budgetary balance as set out in Article 310(1) TFEU are respected. The costs are fully borne by the beneficiaries based on a single cost allocation methodology that ensures transparent and proportional allocation of costs . The repayment obligations should remain with the beneficiaries of the financial assistance, in compliance with Article 220(5)(e) of the Financial Regulation. The common liquidity pool should be maintained at levels that would allow the Commission to meet all expected outflows over the short-term, based on a robust liquidity forecasting capacity. The existence of a large, well-stocked liquidity buffer, capable of managing disbursements over long periods, allows the diversified funding strategy to function without the need for other solutions to address temporary cash shortfalls. To support the most successful implementation of the diversified funding strategy, the Commission should, as far as possible, ensure a continuous market presence and to this end implement all necessary transactions aiming at achieving the best possible funding costs and at facilitating of transactions in debt securities of the Union and Euratom. The latter is crucial in supporting the active involvement of the widest range of investors to markets for Union’s debt instruments. The conduct of the diversified funding strategy requires that a single set of rules is followed in respect of all borrowing and lending programmes which rely on it. The Financial Regulation in its role of a single rulebook for the implementation of the EU budget should provide the basis for those rules. Following the entry into force of this amendment of the Financial Regulation, the Commission will adopt and implement a wider governance framework, risk management procedures, and cost allocation methodology. These new rules of the Financial Regulation should only apply to new financial assistance to third countries for which the basic acts enter into force on or after the date of entry into force of these amendments of the Financial Regulation and the parallel amendment of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2020/2093. The Commission proposed a recast of the Financial Regulation 6 that is being examined by the European Parliament and the Council. The present stand-alone proposal should be adopted as a matter of urgency and the changes incorporated in the pending recast during the legislative process . Consistency with existing policy provisions in the policy area The diversified funding strategy has been introduced for NGEU borrowing and has proven successful so far in that context. Consistency with other Union policies The diversified funding strategy will allow efficient use of borrowing capacity for Union policies which may make use of borrowing and lending operations.

EUROPEAN COMMISSIONBrussels, 9.11.2022COM(2022) 596 final2022/0370(COD)Proposal for aREGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCILamending Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 as regards the establishment of a diversified funding strategy as a general borrowing methodEXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM1.CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL•Reasons for and objectives of the proposalTheCommission has been conducting borrowing and lending operationsto providefinancial assistance in the form of loansto a beneficiary countryfor several decades. Theborrowing and lending operations are guaranteed under the Union’s budget and come under the wider scope of budgetary implementation. General rules for such operations are laid down in Article 220 of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/10461(“Financial Regulation”),whichprovides that the Commissioncan be empowered in a basic act to borrowon behalf of the Union or Euratom to on-lend the corresponding amounts to the beneficiary Member States or third countries under the conditions applicable to the borrowings.The cash flows between theborrowed funds and the loans are matched one-to-one. This means that market operationsarebased on disbursement needs, which limits the possibility to plan various borrowing operationscoherently withthe best market opportunities and structure maturities to achieve the best costs.Thefundingneedsfor Ukrainerequire mobilisation and disbursementin a cost-effectiveflexible and financially soundmanner,integrating allfundingneeds includingforNextGenerationEU(“NGEU”).It is of paramount importance that this funding beorganised underasingle funding methodin order to allow different policy needs to be metconcurrently.To that end, it is necessary to amend Regulation (EU, Euratom)2018/1046 to establish the diversified funding strategy,currently implemented for borrowings underDecision (EU, Euratom) 2020/20532as the baseline method fortheimplementation of borrowing operations.This strategy has allowed the successful mobilisation of funds fornon-repayable supportand loans under Regulation (EU) 2021/2413and a range of other EU policies in 2022.Thiswill allowtheCommissionto finance the assistance toUkraineunder the proposedRegulation establishing an instrumentto providesupport to Ukraine4in a cost-efficient, flexible and financially sound mannerto ensureparallelfinancingof all Unionprogrammesrelying on borrowing.The extension of the scope of application of the diversified funding strategy goes beyond the funding needs for Ukraineand would be available to any future programmes. It willenablethe Commission to use the infrastructure,which allowsan integrated funding planning and communication to markets.In the absence of such a single funding method, the Commission would be required to continue financing different programmes of financial assistance separately. This would create cost and complexity as the different programmes of financial assistance would compete for a limited number of funding opportunities. It would fragment the supply of Union’s debt and reduce liquidity and investor interest in the separate programmes. Financing all financial assistance through a single funding method would therefore enhance the liquidity of the Union’s bonds their attractiveness and cost-effectiveness.The diversified funding strategy is a financing method through which funding transactions are organised in a manner consistent with the limits of financial liability authorised in the basic acts in order to achieve the policy objectives. The implementation of a diversified funding strategy does not change the financial liabilities arising from the borrowing. It provides the Commission with more flexibility in how the Union mobilisesresources through bond issuance.Recourse to adiversified funding strategyas asingle fundingmethodwill allow theCommissionto decouple the timingand the maturityof single funding transactions from the disbursements to beneficiaries.A common liquidity pool financed by the issuance of short-term funding (EU-bills) enables the Commission to organise payments in accordance with a regular and agreed schedule, independently of the exact timing of the long-term bond issuance. This thenallowspayments tobe made tobeneficiaries independently of market conditionsprevailingat the time of the disbursement, and avoidshaving to raise fixed amounts in volatile oradverse conditions.Over the lifetimeof theprogramme offinancial assistance,thenetliabilities generated are fully matched by countervailing assets (amounts outstanding, still to be repaid underloans as they mature5).On this basis,the principles of budgetary neutrality and budgetary balance as set out in Article 310(1) TFEU are respected. The costs are fully borne by the beneficiaries based on a single cost allocation methodology that ensures transparent andproportionalallocation of costs.The repayment obligations should remain with the beneficiaries of the financial assistance, in compliance with Article 220(5)(e) of the Financial Regulation.The common liquidity pool should be maintained at levels that would allow the Commission to meet all expected outflows over the short-term, based on a robust liquidity forecasting capacity. The existence of a large, well-stocked liquidity buffer, capable of managing disbursements over long periods, allows the diversified funding strategy to function without the need for other solutions to address temporary cash shortfalls.To support the most successful implementation of the diversified funding strategy, the Commission should, as far as possible, ensure a continuous market presence and to this end implement all necessary transactions aiming at achieving the best possible funding costs and at facilitating of transactions in debt securities of the Union and Euratom. The latter is crucial in supporting the active involvement of the widest range of investors to markets for Union’s debt instruments.The conduct of the diversified funding strategy requires that a single set of rules is followed in respect of all borrowing and lending programmes which rely on it. The Financial Regulation in its role of a single rulebook for the implementation of the EU budget should provide the basis for those rules.Following the entry into force of this amendment of the Financial Regulation, the Commission will adopt and implement a wider governance framework, risk management procedures, and cost allocation methodology.These new rules of the Financial Regulation should only apply to new financial assistance to third countries for which the basic acts enter into force on or after the date of entry into force of these amendments of the Financial Regulation and the parallel amendment of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2020/2093.The Commission proposed a recast of the Financial Regulation6that is being examined by the European Parliament and the Council. The present stand-alone proposal should be adopted as a matter of urgency andthe changes incorporated in the pending recast during the legislative process.
Revised version (Article 108 Recovery of fines, other penalties or sanctions imposed by Union institutions):
1. Where an action is brought before the Court of Justice of the European Union against a decision of a Union institution imposing a fine, other penalty or sanction under the TFEU or the Euratom Treaty and until such time as all legal remedies have been exhausted, the debtor shall either provisionally pay the amounts concerned on the bank account designated by the accounting officer of the Commission or lodge a financial guarantee acceptable to the accounting officer of the Commission. The guarantee shall be independent of the obligation to pay the fine, other penalty or sanction and shall be enforceable on demand. It shall cover the claim as to principal and the interest due as specified in Article 99(4). 2. The Commission shall secure the provisionally collected amounts by having them invested in financial assets, thereby ensuring the security and liquidity of the monies whilst also aiming at yielding a positive return. 3. After the exhaustion of all legal remedies and where the fine, other penalty or sanction has been confirmed by the Court of Justice of the European Union, or where the decision imposing such a fine, other penalty or sanction may no longer become subject to an appeal before the Court of Justice of the European Union, one of the following measures shall be taken: (a) the provisionally collected amounts and the return on them shall be entered in the budget in accordance with Article 107(2); (b) where a financial guarantee has been lodged, it shall be enforced and the corresponding amounts entered in the budget. 4. After all legal remedies have been exhausted and where the fine, other penalty or sanction has been cancelled or the amount has been reduced, one of the following measures shall be taken: (a) the provisionally collected amounts or, in the event of a reduction, the relevant part thereof, including any return, shall be repaid to the third party concerned; (b) where a financial guarantee has been lodged, it shall be released accordingly. After all legal remedies have been exhausted and where the fine, other penalty or sanction has been cancelled or the amount has been reduced, one of the following measures shall be taken: (a) the provisionally collected amounts or, in the event of a reduction, the relevant part thereof, including any return, shall be repaid to the third party concerned; (b) where a financial guarantee has been lodged, it shall be released accordingly. In the cases referred to in point (a) of the first subparagraph, where the overall return on the provisionally collected amount is negative, the loss incurred shall be deducted from the amount to be repaid.
Article 109 Compensatory interests
Without prejudice to Articles 99(2) and 116(5), and for cases other than fines, other penalties and sanctions as referred to in Articles 107 and 108, when an amount is to be reimbursed following a judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union or as a result of an amicable settlement, the interest rate shall be the rate applied by the European Central Bank to its principal refinancing operations, as published in the C series of the Official Journal of the European Union on the first calendar day of each month. The interest rate shall not be negative. The interest shall run from the date of payment of the amount to be reimbursed until the date at which the reimbursement is due. In cases where the overall interest rate would be negative it shall be set at zero percent.
Article 110 Financing decisions
1. A budgetary commitment shall be preceded by a financing decision adopted by the Union institution or by the authority to which powers have been delegated by the Union institution. The financing decisions shall be annual or multiannual. The first subparagraph of this paragraph shall not apply in the case of appropriations for the operations of each Union institution under its administrative autonomy that can be implemented without a basic act in accordance with point (e) of Article 58(2), of administrative support expenditure and of contributions to the Union bodies referred to in Articles 70 and 71. 2. The financing decision shall at the same time constitute the annual or multiannual work programme and shall be adopted, as appropriate, as soon as possible after the adoption of the draft budget and in principle no later than 31 March of the year of implementation. Where the relevant basic act provides for specific modalities for the adoption of a financing decision or a work programme or both, those modalities shall be applied to the part of the financing decision constituting the work programme, in compliance with the requirements of that basic act. The part which constitutes the work programme shall be published on the website of the Union institution concerned immediately after its adoption and prior to its implementation. The financing decision shall indicate the total amount it covers and shall contain a description of the actions to be financed. It shall specify: (a) the basic act and the budget line; (b) the objectives pursued and the expected results; (c) the methods of implementation; (d) any additional information required by the basic act for the work programme. 3. In addition to the elements referred to in paragraph 2, the financing decision shall set out the following: (a) for grants: the type of applicants targeted by the call for proposals or direct award and the global budgetary envelope reserved for the grants; (b) for procurement: the global budgetary envelope reserved for procurements; (c) for contributions to Union trust funds referred to in Article 234: the appropriations reserved for the trust fund for the year together with the amounts planned over its duration, from the budget as well as from other donors; (d) for prizes: the type of participants targeted by the contest, the global budgetary envelope reserved for the contest and a specific reference to prizes with a unit value of EUR 1 000 000 or more; (e) for financial instruments: the amount allocated to the financial instrument; (f) in the event of indirect management: the person or entity implementing Union funds pursuant to point (c) of the first subparagraph of Article 62(1) or the criteria to be used to select the person or entity; (g) for contributions to blending facilities or platforms: the amount allocated to the blending facility or platform and the list of entities participating in the blending facility or platform; (h) for budgetary guarantees: the amount of annual provisioning and, where applicable, the amount of the budgetary guarantee to be released. 4. The authorising officer by delegation may add any additional information considered appropriate either in the respective financing decision constituting the work programme or in any other document published on the website of the Union institution. A multiannual financing decision shall be consistent with the financial programming referred to in Article 41(2) and shall specify that the implementation of the decision is subject to the availability of budget appropriations for the respective financial years after the adoption of the budget or as provided for in the system of provisional twelfths. 5. Without prejudice to any specific provision of a basic act, any substantial change in a financing decision already adopted shall follow the same procedure as the initial decision.
Article 111 Expenditure operations
1. Every item of expenditure shall be committed, validated, authorised and paid. At the end of the periods referred to in Article 114, the unused balance of budgetary commitments shall be decommitted. When executing operations, the authorising officer responsible shall ensure that the expenditure is in compliance with the Treaties, the budget, this Regulation, and other acts adopted pursuant to the Treaties as well as with the principle of sound financial management. 2. Budgetary commitments shall be made and legal commitments entered into by the same authorising officer, except in duly justified cases. In particular, in the field of crisis management aid and humanitarian aid operations, legal commitments may be entered into by Heads of Union delegations, or in their absence by their deputies, on the instruction of the authorising officer responsible of the Commission who remains fully responsible, however, for the underlying transaction. The personnel employed by the Commission in the field of crisis management aid and humanitarian aid operations may sign legal commitments linked to payments executed from imprest accounts of a value not exceeding EUR 2 500. The authorising officer responsible shall make a budgetary commitment before entering into a legal commitment with third parties or transferring funds to a Union trust fund referred to in Article 234. The second subparagraph of this paragraph shall not apply: (a) to legal commitments concluded following a declaration of a crisis situation in the framework of a business continuity plan, in accordance with the procedures adopted by the Commission or by any other Union institution under its administrative autonomy; (b) in the case of humanitarian aid operations, civil protection operations and crisis management aid, if efficient delivery of the Union’s intervention requires that the Union enter into a legal commitment with third parties immediately and if prior booking of the individual budgetary commitment is not possible. In the cases referred to in point (b) of the third subparagraph, the budgetary commitment shall be booked without delay after entering into a legal commitment with third parties. 3. The authorising officer responsible shall validate expenditure by accepting that an item of expenditure is charged to the budget, after having checked the supporting documents attesting the creditor’s entitlement as per the conditions set in the legal commitment when there is a legal commitment. For that purpose, the authorising officer responsible shall: (a) verify the existence of the creditor’s entitlement; (b) determine or verify the reality and the amount of the claim through the endorsement ‘certified correct’; (c) verify the conditions according to which payment is due. Notwithstanding the first subparagraph, the validation of expenditure shall also apply to interim or final reports not associated with a payment request in which case the impact on the accounting system is limited to the general accounts. 4. The validation decision shall be expressed through electronically secured signature in accordance with Article 146 by the authorising officer, or by a technically competent member of staff duly empowered by a formal decision of the authorising officer, or, exceptionally, for paper workflow take the form of a stamp incorporating that signature. With the endorsement ‘certified correct’ the authorising officer responsible, or a technically competent member of staff duly empowered by the authorising officer responsible, shall certify: (a) for pre-financing: that the conditions required in the legal commitment for the payment of the pre-financing are met; (b) for interim and balance payments in contracts: that the services provided for in the contract have been properly provided, the supplies properly delivered or that the work has been properly carried out; (c) for interim and balance payments in grants: that the action or work programme carried out by the beneficiary is in all respects in compliance with the grant agreement, including, where applicable that the costs declared by the beneficiary are eligible. In the case referred to in point (c) of the second subparagraph, cost estimates shall not be deemed to comply with the eligibility conditions set out in Article 186(3). The same principle shall also apply to interim and final reports not associated to a payment request. 5. In order to authorise the expenditure, the authorising officer responsible shall, after having verified that the appropriations are available, issue a payment order to instruct the accounting officer to pay the amount of expenditure which was previously validated. Where periodic payments are made with regard to services rendered, including rental services, or goods delivered, the authorising officer may, subject to that officer’s risk analysis, order the application of a direct debit system from an imprest account. The application of such a system may also be ordered if it is specifically authorised by the accounting officer in accordance with Article 86(3).
Article 112 Types of budgetary commitments
1. Budgetary commitments shall fall into one of the following categories: (a) individual: when the recipient and the amount of the expenditure are known; (b) global: when at least one of the elements necessary to identify the individual commitment is still not known; (c) provisional: to cover routine management expenditure for the EAGF as referred to in Article 11(2), and routine administrative expenditure where either the amount or the final payees are not definitively known. Notwithstanding point (c) of the first subparagraph, routine administrative expenditure relating to Union delegations and Union representations may be covered by provisional budgetary commitments also when the amount and final payee are known. 2. Budgetary commitments for actions extending over more than one financial year may be broken down over several years into annual instalments only where the basic act so provides or where they relate to administrative expenditure. 3. A global budgetary commitment shall be made on the basis of a financing decision. The global budgetary commitment shall be made at the latest before the decision on the recipients and amounts is taken and, where implementation of the appropriations concerned involves the adoption of a work programme, at the earliest after that programme has been adopted. 4. A global budgetary commitment shall be implemented either by the conclusion of a financing agreement, itself providing for the subsequent entering into one or more legal commitments, or by entering into one or more legal commitments. Financing agreements in the field of direct financial assistance to third countries, including budget support, which constitute legal commitments may give rise to payments without entering into other legal commitments. Where the global budgetary commitment is implemented by the conclusion of a financing agreement, the second subparagraph of paragraph 3 shall not apply. 5. Each individual legal commitment entered into following a global budgetary commitment shall, prior to signature, be registered by the authorising officer responsible in the central budgetary accounts and booked to the global budgetary commitment. 6. Provisional budgetary commitments shall be implemented by entering into one or more legal commitments giving rise to an entitlement to subsequent payments. However, in cases relating to expenditure on staff management, expenditure on members or former members of a Union institution or expenditure on communication engaged in by Union institutions for the coverage of Union events, or in the cases referred to in point 14.5 of Annex I, they may be implemented directly by payments without entering into prior legal commitments.
Article 113 Commitments for EAGF appropriations
1. For each financial year, the EAGF appropriations shall include non-differentiated appropriations for expenditure related to measures referred to in Article 4(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013. Expenditure related to the measures referred to in Article 4(2) and Article 6 of that Regulation, with the exception of measures financed under non-operational technical assistance and contributions to executive agencies, shall be covered by differentiated appropriations. 2. The Commission decisions fixing the amount of reimbursement of expenditure related to the EAGF incurred by Member States shall constitute global provisional budgetary commitments, which shall not exceed the total appropriations entered in the budget for the EAGF. 3. Global provisional budgetary commitments for the EAGF which have been made for a financial year and which have not given rise to a commitment on specific budget lines by 1 February of the following financial year shall be decommitted in respect of the financial year concerned. 4. Expenditure effected by the authorities and bodies referred to in the rules relating to the EAGF shall, within two months of receipt of the statements sent by Member States, be the subject of a commitment by chapter, article and item. Such commitments may be made after the expiry of that two-month period where a procedure for a transfer of appropriations concerning the relevant budget lines is necessary. Except where payment has not yet been made by Member States or where eligibility is in doubt, the amounts shall be charged as payments within the same two-month period. The commitments referred to in the first subparagraph of this paragraph shall be deducted from the global provisional budgetary commitment referred to in paragraph 1. 5. Paragraphs 2 and 3 shall apply subject to the examination and acceptance of the accounts.
Article 114 Time limits for commitments
1. Without prejudice to Articles 111(2) and 264(3), legal commitments relating to individual or provisional budgetary commitments shall be entered into by 31 December of year n, year n being the one in which the budgetary commitment was made. 2. Global budgetary commitments shall cover the total cost of the corresponding legal commitments entered into up to 31 December of year n+1. Where the global budgetary commitment gives rise to the award of a prize referred to in Title IX, the legal commitment referred to in Article 207(4) shall be entered into by 31 December of year n+3. In external actions, where the global budgetary commitment gives rise to a financing agreement concluded with a third country, the financing agreement shall be concluded by 31 December of year n+1. In that case, the global budgetary commitment shall cover the total costs of legal commitments implementing the financing agreement entered into within a period of three years following the date of conclusion of the financing agreement. However, in the following cases, the global budgetary commitment shall cover the total costs of legal commitments entered into until the end of the period of implementation of the financing agreement: (a) multi-donor actions; (b) blending operations; (c) legal commitments relating to audit and evaluation; (d) the following exceptional circumstances: (i) modifications made to legal commitments which have already been entered into; (ii) legal commitments that are to be entered into after early termination of an existing legal commitment; (iii) changes of the implementing entity. 3. The third and fourth subparagraphs of paragraph 2 shall not apply to the following multiannual programmes that are implemented through split commitments: (a) the Instrument for Pre-accession Assistance established by Regulation (EU) No 231/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council ( 41 ) ; (b) the European Neighbourhood Instrument established by Regulation (EU) No 232/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council ( 42 ) . In the cases referred to in the first subparagraph, the appropriations shall be automatically decommitted by the Commission in accordance with sector-specific rules. 4. The individual and provisional budgetary commitments for actions extending over more than one financial year shall, except in the case of staff expenditure, have a final date for implementation set, in accordance with the conditions in the legal commitments to which they refer, and taking into account the principle of sound financial management. 5. Any parts of budgetary commitments which have not been implemented by payments six months after the final date for implementation shall be decommitted. 6. The amount of a budgetary commitment for which no payment within the meaning of Article 115 has been made within two years of the entering into the legal commitment shall be decommitted, except where that amount relates to a case under litigation before judicial courts or arbitral bodies, where the legal commitment takes the form of a financing agreement with a third country or where there are special provisions laid down in sector-specific rules.
Amendment rationale: CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL Reasons for and objectives of the proposal The Commission has been conducting borrowing and lending operations to provide financial assistance in the form of loans to a beneficiary country for several decades . The borrowing and lending operations are guaranteed under the Union’s budget and come under the wider scope of budgetary implementation. G eneral rules for such operations are laid down in Article 220 of Regulation ( EU, Euratom ) 2018/1046 1 (“Financial Regulation”) , which provides that the Commission can be empowered in a basic act to borrow on behalf of the Union or Euratom to on-lend the corresponding amounts to the beneficiary Member States or third countries under the conditions applicable to the borrowings. The cash flows between the borrowed funds and the loans are matched one-to-one. This means that market operations are based on disbursement needs, which limits the possibility to plan various borrowing operations coherently with the best market opportunities and structure maturities to achieve the best costs. The funding needs for Ukraine require mobilisation and disbursement in a cost-effective flexible and financially sound manner, integrating all funding needs including for N ext G eneration EU (“ NGEU ”) . I t is of paramount importance that this funding be organised under a single funding method in order to allow different policy needs to be met concurrently . To that end, it is necessary to amend Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 to establish the diversified funding strategy , currently implemented for borrowings under Decision (EU, Euratom) 2020/2053 2 as the baseline method for the implementation of borrowing operations. This strategy has allowed the successful mobilisation of funds for non-repayable support and loans under Regulation (EU) 2021/241 3 and a range of other EU policies in 2022. This will allow the Commission to finance the assistance to Ukraine under the proposed Regulation establishing an instrument to provide support to Ukraine 4 in a cost-efficient, flexible and financially sound manner to ensure parallel financing of all Union programmes relying on borrowing . T he extension of the scope of application of the diversified funding strategy goes beyond the funding needs for Ukraine and would be available to any future programmes . It will enable the Commission to use the infrastructure, which allows an integrated funding planning and communication to markets. In the absence of such a single funding method, the Commission would be required to continue financing different programmes of financial assistance separately. This would create cost and complexity as the different programmes of financial assistance would compete for a limited number of funding opportunities. It would fragment the supply of Union’s debt and reduce liquidity and investor interest in the separate programmes. Financing all financial assistance through a single funding method would therefore enhance the liquidity of the Union’s bonds their attractiveness and cost-effectiveness. The diversified funding strategy is a financing method through which funding transactions are organised in a manner consistent with the limits of financial liability authorised in the basic acts in order to achieve the policy objectives. The implementation of a diversified funding strategy does not change the financial liabilities arising from the borrowing. It provides the Commission with more flexibility in how the Union mobilises resources through bond issuance. Recourse to a diversified funding strategy as a single funding method will allow the Commission to decouple the timing and the maturity of single funding transactions from the disbursements to beneficiaries. A common liquidity pool financed by the issuance of short-term funding (EU-bills) enables the Commission to organise payments in accordance with a regular and agreed schedule, independently of the exact timing of the long-term bond issuance. This then allows payments to be made to beneficiaries independently of market conditions pre vailing at the time of the disbursement , and avoid s having to raise fixed amounts in volatile o r adverse conditions. Over the life time of the programme of financial assistance , the net liabilities generated are fully matched by countervailing assets ( amounts outstanding, still to be repaid under loans as they mature 5 ) . On this basis, the principles of budgetary neutrality and budgetary balance as set out in Article 310(1) TFEU are respected. The costs are fully borne by the beneficiaries based on a single cost allocation methodology that ensures transparent and proportional allocation of costs . The repayment obligations should remain with the beneficiaries of the financial assistance, in compliance with Article 220(5)(e) of the Financial Regulation. The common liquidity pool should be maintained at levels that would allow the Commission to meet all expected outflows over the short-term, based on a robust liquidity forecasting capacity. The existence of a large, well-stocked liquidity buffer, capable of managing disbursements over long periods, allows the diversified funding strategy to function without the need for other solutions to address temporary cash shortfalls. To support the most successful implementation of the diversified funding strategy, the Commission should, as far as possible, ensure a continuous market presence and to this end implement all necessary transactions aiming at achieving the best possible funding costs and at facilitating of transactions in debt securities of the Union and Euratom. The latter is crucial in supporting the active involvement of the widest range of investors to markets for Union’s debt instruments. The conduct of the diversified funding strategy requires that a single set of rules is followed in respect of all borrowing and lending programmes which rely on it. The Financial Regulation in its role of a single rulebook for the implementation of the EU budget should provide the basis for those rules. Following the entry into force of this amendment of the Financial Regulation, the Commission will adopt and implement a wider governance framework, risk management procedures, and cost allocation methodology. These new rules of the Financial Regulation should only apply to new financial assistance to third countries for which the basic acts enter into force on or after the date of entry into force of these amendments of the Financial Regulation and the parallel amendment of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2020/2093. The Commission proposed a recast of the Financial Regulation 6 that is being examined by the European Parliament and the Council. The present stand-alone proposal should be adopted as a matter of urgency and the changes incorporated in the pending recast during the legislative process . Consistency with existing policy provisions in the policy area The diversified funding strategy has been introduced for NGEU borrowing and has proven successful so far in that context. Consistency with other Union policies The diversified funding strategy will allow efficient use of borrowing capacity for Union policies which may make use of borrowing and lending operations.

EUROPEAN COMMISSIONBrussels, 9.11.2022COM(2022) 596 final2022/0370(COD)Proposal for aREGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCILamending Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 as regards the establishment of a diversified funding strategy as a general borrowing methodEXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM1.CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL•Reasons for and objectives of the proposalTheCommission has been conducting borrowing and lending operationsto providefinancial assistance in the form of loansto a beneficiary countryfor several decades. Theborrowing and lending operations are guaranteed under the Union’s budget and come under the wider scope of budgetary implementation. General rules for such operations are laid down in Article 220 of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/10461(“Financial Regulation”),whichprovides that the Commissioncan be empowered in a basic act to borrowon behalf of the Union or Euratom to on-lend the corresponding amounts to the beneficiary Member States or third countries under the conditions applicable to the borrowings.The cash flows between theborrowed funds and the loans are matched one-to-one. This means that market operationsarebased on disbursement needs, which limits the possibility to plan various borrowing operationscoherently withthe best market opportunities and structure maturities to achieve the best costs.Thefundingneedsfor Ukrainerequire mobilisation and disbursementin a cost-effectiveflexible and financially soundmanner,integrating allfundingneeds includingforNextGenerationEU(“NGEU”).It is of paramount importance that this funding beorganised underasingle funding methodin order to allow different policy needs to be metconcurrently.To that end, it is necessary to amend Regulation (EU, Euratom)2018/1046 to establish the diversified funding strategy,currently implemented for borrowings underDecision (EU, Euratom) 2020/20532as the baseline method fortheimplementation of borrowing operations.This strategy has allowed the successful mobilisation of funds fornon-repayable supportand loans under Regulation (EU) 2021/2413and a range of other EU policies in 2022.Thiswill allowtheCommissionto finance the assistance toUkraineunder the proposedRegulation establishing an instrumentto providesupport to Ukraine4in a cost-efficient, flexible and financially sound mannerto ensureparallelfinancingof all Unionprogrammesrelying on borrowing.The extension of the scope of application of the diversified funding strategy goes beyond the funding needs for Ukraineand would be available to any future programmes. It willenablethe Commission to use the infrastructure,which allowsan integrated funding planning and communication to markets.In the absence of such a single funding method, the Commission would be required to continue financing different programmes of financial assistance separately. This would create cost and complexity as the different programmes of financial assistance would compete for a limited number of funding opportunities. It would fragment the supply of Union’s debt and reduce liquidity and investor interest in the separate programmes. Financing all financial assistance through a single funding method would therefore enhance the liquidity of the Union’s bonds their attractiveness and cost-effectiveness.The diversified funding strategy is a financing method through which funding transactions are organised in a manner consistent with the limits of financial liability authorised in the basic acts in order to achieve the policy objectives. The implementation of a diversified funding strategy does not change the financial liabilities arising from the borrowing. It provides the Commission with more flexibility in how the Union mobilisesresources through bond issuance.Recourse to adiversified funding strategyas asingle fundingmethodwill allow theCommissionto decouple the timingand the maturityof single funding transactions from the disbursements to beneficiaries.A common liquidity pool financed by the issuance of short-term funding (EU-bills) enables the Commission to organise payments in accordance with a regular and agreed schedule, independently of the exact timing of the long-term bond issuance. This thenallowspayments tobe made tobeneficiaries independently of market conditionsprevailingat the time of the disbursement, and avoidshaving to raise fixed amounts in volatile oradverse conditions.Over the lifetimeof theprogramme offinancial assistance,thenetliabilities generated are fully matched by countervailing assets (amounts outstanding, still to be repaid underloans as they mature5).On this basis,the principles of budgetary neutrality and budgetary balance as set out in Article 310(1) TFEU are respected. The costs are fully borne by the beneficiaries based on a single cost allocation methodology that ensures transparent andproportionalallocation of costs.The repayment obligations should remain with the beneficiaries of the financial assistance, in compliance with Article 220(5)(e) of the Financial Regulation.The common liquidity pool should be maintained at levels that would allow the Commission to meet all expected outflows over the short-term, based on a robust liquidity forecasting capacity. The existence of a large, well-stocked liquidity buffer, capable of managing disbursements over long periods, allows the diversified funding strategy to function without the need for other solutions to address temporary cash shortfalls.To support the most successful implementation of the diversified funding strategy, the Commission should, as far as possible, ensure a continuous market presence and to this end implement all necessary transactions aiming at achieving the best possible funding costs and at facilitating of transactions in debt securities of the Union and Euratom. The latter is crucial in supporting the active involvement of the widest range of investors to markets for Union’s debt instruments.The conduct of the diversified funding strategy requires that a single set of rules is followed in respect of all borrowing and lending programmes which rely on it. The Financial Regulation in its role of a single rulebook for the implementation of the EU budget should provide the basis for those rules.Following the entry into force of this amendment of the Financial Regulation, the Commission will adopt and implement a wider governance framework, risk management procedures, and cost allocation methodology.These new rules of the Financial Regulation should only apply to new financial assistance to third countries for which the basic acts enter into force on or after the date of entry into force of these amendments of the Financial Regulation and the parallel amendment of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2020/2093.The Commission proposed a recast of the Financial Regulation6that is being examined by the European Parliament and the Council. The present stand-alone proposal should be adopted as a matter of urgency andthe changes incorporated in the pending recast during the legislative process.
Revised version (Article 114 Time limits for commitments):
1. Without prejudice to Articles 111(2) and 264(3), legal commitments relating to individual or provisional budgetary commitments shall be entered into by 31 December of year n, year n being the one in which the budgetary commitment was made. 2. Global budgetary commitments shall cover the total cost of the corresponding legal commitments entered into up to 31 December of year n+1. Where the global budgetary commitment gives rise to the award of a prize referred to in Title IX, the legal commitment referred to in Article 207(4) shall be entered into by 31 December of year n+3. In external actions, where the global budgetary commitment gives rise to a financing agreement concluded with a third country, the financing agreement shall be concluded by 31 December of year n+1. In that case, the global budgetary commitment shall cover the total costs of legal commitments implementing the financing agreement entered into within a period of three years following the date of conclusion of the financing agreement. However, in the following cases, the global budgetary commitment shall cover the total costs of legal commitments entered into until the end of the period of implementation of the financing agreement: (a) multi-donor actions; (b) blending operations; (c) legal commitments relating to audit and evaluation; the following exceptional circumstances: (i) modifications made to legal commitments which have already been entered into; (ii) legal commitments that are to be entered into after early termination of an existing legal commitment; (iii) changes of the implementing entity. The third and fourth subparagraphs of paragraph 2 shall not apply to the following multiannual programmes that are implemented through split commitments: (a) the Instrument for Pre-accession Assistance established by Regulation (EU) No 231/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council ( 10 ); (b) the European Neighbourhood Instrument established by Regulation (EU) No 232/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council ( 11 ). In the cases referred to in the first subparagraph, the appropriations shall be automatically decommitted by the Commission in accordance with sector-specific rules. 4. The individual and provisional budgetary commitments for actions extending over more than one financial year shall, except in the case of staff expenditure, have a final date for implementation set, in accordance with the conditions in the legal commitments to which they refer, and taking into account the principle of sound financial management. 5. Any parts of budgetary commitments which have not been implemented by payments six months after the final date for implementation shall be decommitted. 6. The amount of a budgetary commitment for which no payment within the meaning of Article 115 has been made within two years of the entering into the legal commitment shall be decommitted, except where that amount relates to a case under litigation before judicial courts or arbitral bodies, where the legal commitment takes the form of a financing agreement with a third country or where there are special provisions laid down in sector-specific rules.
Article 115 Types of payments
1. Payment of expenditure shall be made by the accounting officer within the limits of the funds available. 2. Payment shall be made on production of proof that the relevant action is in accordance with the contract, the agreement or the basic act and shall cover one or more of the following operations: (a) payment of the entire amount due; (b) payment of the amount due in any of the following ways: (i) pre-financing providing a float, which may be divided into a number of payments in accordance with the principle of sound financial management; such pre-financing amount shall be paid either on the basis of the contract, the agreement or the basic act, or on the basis of supporting documents which make it possible to check that the terms of the contract or agreement in question are complied with; (ii) one or more interim payments as a counterpart of a partial execution of the action or partial performance of the contract or agreement, which may clear pre-financing in whole or in part, without prejudice to the basic act; (iii) one payment of the balance of the amounts due where the action is completely executed, or the contract or agreement is completely performed; (c) payment of a provision into the common provisioning fund established pursuant to Article 212. The payment of the balance shall clear all preceding expenditure. A recovery order shall be issued to recover unused amounts. 3. A distinction shall be made in budgetary accounting between the different types of payment referred to in paragraph 2 at the time each payment is made. 4. The accounting rules referred to in Article 80 shall include the rules for clearing the pre-financing in the accounts and for the acknowledgment of the eligibility of costs. 5. Pre-financing payments shall be cleared regularly by the authorising officer responsible, according to the economic nature of the project and, at the latest, at the end of the project. The clearing shall be performed on the basis of information on costs incurred or confirmation of the conditions for payment being fulfilled in accordance with Article 125 as validated by the authorising officer in accordance with Article 111(3). For grant agreements, contracts or contribution agreements above EUR 5 000 000, the authorising officer shall obtain at each year-end at least the information needed to calculate a reasonable estimate of the costs. That information shall not be used for clearing the pre-financing, but may be used by the authorising officer and the accounting officer to comply with Article 82(2). For the purposes of the second subparagraph, appropriate provisions shall be included in the legal commitments entered into.