Article 1 Subject matter
This Directive establishes a scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Community scheme’) in order to promote reductions of greenhouse gas emissions in a cost-effective and economically efficient manner. This Directive also provides for the reductions of greenhouse gas emissions to be increased so as to contribute to the levels of reductions that are considered scientifically necessary to avoid dangerous climate change. This Directive also lays down provisions for assessing and implementing a stricter Community reduction commitment exceeding 20 %, to be applied upon the approval by the Community of an international agreement on climate change leading to greenhouse gas emission reductions exceeding those required in Article 9, as reflected in the 30 % commitment endorsed by the European Council of March 2007.
Amendment rationale: CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL Reasons for and objectives of the proposal The European Green Deal Communication 1 launched a new growth strategy for the EU that aims to transform the EU into a fair and prosperous society with a modern, resource-efficient and competitive economy. It reaffirms the Commission’s ambition to increase its climate targets and make Europe the first climate-neutral continent by 2050. Furthermore, it aims to protect the health and well-being of citizens from environment-related risks and impacts. The necessity and value of the European Green Deal have only grown in light of the very severe effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the health, living and working conditions and well-being of the Union’s citizens. Tackling climate change is an urgent challenge. In line with the scientific findings of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Special Report, global net-zero CO 2 emissions need to be achieved around 2050, and neutrality for all other greenhouse gases as soon as possible later in the century. This urgent challenge requires the EU to step up its action and demonstrate global leadership by becoming climate neutral by 2050. This objective is set out in the Communication ‘ A Clean Planet for all ’ - A European strategic long-term vision for a prosperous, modern, competitive and climate-neutral economy’ 2 . Based on the European Green Deal strategy and a comprehensive impact assessment, the Commission’s Communication of September 2020 on Stepping up Europe’s 2030 climate ambition 3 (‘2030 Climate Target Plan’) proposed to raise the EU's ambition and put forward a comprehensive plan to increase the European Union’s binding target for 2030 towards at least 55 % net emission reduction, in a responsible way. Raising the 2030 ambition now helps give certainty to policymakers and investors, so that decisions made in the coming years do not lock in emission levels inconsistent with the EU’s objective to be climate neutral by 2050. The 2030 target is in line with the Paris Agreement objective to keep the global temperature increase to well below 2°C and pursue efforts to keep it to 1.5°C. The European Council endorsed the new EU binding target for 2030 at its meeting of December 2020 4 . It also called on the Commission “ to assess how all economic sectors can best contribute to the 2030 target and to make the necessary proposals, accompanied by an in-depth examination of the environmental, economic and social impact at Member State level, taking into account national energy and climate plans and reviewing existing flexibilities ”. To this end, the European Climate Law 5 , as agreed with the co-legislators, makes the EU’s climate neutrality target legally binding, and raises the 2030 ambition by setting a target of at least 55 % net emission reductions by 2030 compared to 1990. In order to follow the pathway proposed in the European Climate Law, and deliver this increased level of ambition for 2030, the Commission has reviewed the climate and energy legislation currently in place that are expected to only reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 40 % by 2030 and by 60 % by 2050. This ‘ Fit for 55 ’ legislative package, as announced in the 2030 Climate Target Plan, is the most comprehensive building block in the efforts to implement the ambitious new 2030 climate target, and all economic sectors and policies will need to make their contribution. The European Council also invited the Commission in December 2020 to consider exploring ways to strengthen the EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS), while preserving its integrity and taking into account the need to address distributional concerns and energy poverty. The European Council also invited the Commission to consider proposing measures that enable energy-intensive industries to develop and deploy innovative climate-neutral technologies while maintaining their industrial competitiveness. The current ETS legislation was revised in 2018 to deliver a 43 % reduction in EU ETS emissions by 2030 compared to 2005, coherent with an EU economy-wide emissions reduction target of at least 40 % by 2030 compared to 1990. More recent analysis by the Commission services, however, indicates that, if the legislation remains unchanged, the sectors currently covered by the EU ETS would instead achieve emission reductions of -51 % in 2030 compared to 2005 6 . Even though this would mean outperforming the contribution of -43 % referred to above, it would still be an insufficient contribution to an overall target of at least -55 % compared to 1990. Therefore, the general objective of this initiative is to revise the ETS Directive in a manner commensurate with the 2030 climate ambition to reach at least 55 % net greenhouse gas emission reductions by 2030 below 1990 levels and with a gradual and balanced trajectory towards climate neutrality by 2050, in a cost-effective and coherent way while taking into account the need for a just transition and the need for all sectors to contribute to the EU’s climate efforts. As explained in the impact assessment, contribution of the sectors covered by the EU ETS of -61 % compared to 2005 is considered as best reflecting the 2030 Climate Target Plan results and is taken as the EU ETS ambition contributing to an overall target of at least -55 % compared to 1990. Increasing the EU ETS’s environmental contribution entails adjusting primarily the total number of allowances issued under the EU ETS (the ‘cap’). However, a reduced amount of allowances available to the market affects other pillars of the EU ETS and the carbon price. It impacts core principles such as the need for market stability, the protection against the risk of carbon leakage, the carefully balanced distributional effects between Member States, and the availability of funds for the increased investment needs in low-carbon technologies. At the same time as the EU ETS is brought in line with the overall target of at least -55 % compared to 1990, this increased climate ambition also needs to be reflected in the contribution to the EU’s climate efforts of sectors currently outside of the EU ETS. The impact assessment accompanying the 2030 Climate Target Plan found that in the absence of additional measures, emissions in certain sectors would not decrease as much as required to be on a path to achieve an economy-wide 55 % reduction in emissions. In fact, in maritime transport, emissions today are higher than in 1990, and maritime transport emissions are expected to grow further in a business-as-usual scenario . All pathways assessed as part of the 2030 Climate Target Plan and the Sustainable and Smart Mobility Strategy 7 envisage 80-82 % emissions reductions from international shipping by 2050 relative to 1990 (equivalent to 88-89 % emissions reductions relative to 2008) 8 , in order to be consistent with the increased level of climate ambition. Therefore, the European Commission undertook the commitment to extend the EU ETS to maritime transport as part of a basket of EU measures to address emissions from maritime transport , along with action agreed within the IMO. In this context, the Commission welcomes the progress that the European Parliament and the Council have made since 2019 on the proposal to amend Regulation (EU) 2015/757 9 in order to take appropriate account of the global data collection system for ship fuel oil consumption data ( COM(2019) 38 final) and the Commission takes note of the European Parliament’s Plenary support for the extension of the EU’s Emissions Trading System (EU ETS) to cover maritime transport emissions from 2023. Emissions from maritime transport should be included in the existing emissions trading system. To ensure a smooth transition, a phase-in period should be introduced where shipping companies would only have to surrender allowances for a portion of their verified emissions, gradually rising to 100 % over 4 years. As only around 90 million tons of CO 2 would be added through the extension to maritime transport to the existing ETS, the impact on the availability of allowances for other sectors covered would remain limited. To take into account the inclusion of the maritime sector in the EU ETS, Regulation (EU) 2015/757 should be amended, in particular as regards the reporting of aggregated emissions data at company level and considering the role of administering authorities in respect of shipping companies. These amendments complement those proposed in COM(2019) 38 final. As specified in the 2030 Climate Target Plan, the building sector is currently responsible directly and indirectly for 36 % of energy-related greenhouse gas emissions in the EU and has a large cost-effective potential to reduce emissions. More than half of those emissions are already covered by the existing ETS, notably the provision of electricity for use in buildings and most emissions of district heating. However, many homes are still heated with outdated systems that use polluting fossil fuels such as coal and oil. The sector of road transport also has a significant cost-effective reduction potential. Today, road transport accounts for a fifth of the EU’s greenhouse gas emissions and increased its emissions by over a quarter since 1990. As already considered in the European Green Deal Communication, the Commission is proposing to include the building sector and road transport into emissions trading. The coverage of these sectors by emissions trading, when put in the context of other appropriate regulatory and investment measures for the sectors in question, would provide for increased and more harmonised economic incentives to reduce emissions across these sectors in the EU and increased certainty of delivery of the emission reductions for those sectors. Emissions trading for the buildings and road transport sectors should be introduced through separate but adjacent emissions trading. This will avoid any disturbance of the well-functioning emissions trading system for stationary installations and aviation, given the different reduction potentials in those sectors and different factors that influence the demand. Any possible merger of the two systems should be assessed only after a few years of functioning of the new emissions trading, based on experience. The extension to buildings and road transport requires an upstream approach to regulated entities. Market stability is crucial for the EU ETS to function correctly to achieve its targets. To ensure market stability, Decision (EU) 2015/1814 10 established the market stability reserve (MSR). It began operating in January 2019. The objectives of the MSR are to tackle historical supply-demand imbalances and to make the EU ETS more resilient to major imbalances. The mechanism must preserve regulatory stability and ensure long-term predictability. Article 3 of the Decision requires the Commission to review the functioning of the reserve within three years of the start of the operation. This review needs to be considered together with the effects for market stability of increasing the ambition of the EU ETS, so the necessary amendments to the reserve are proposed together with the amendments to the EU ETS with this proposal. In this context, this proposal, as part of the Fit for 55 package, has the following specific objectives: – strengthening the EU ETS in its current scope in order to provide the appropriate contribution to an overall target of at least -55 % GHG emissions compared to 1990; – ensuring continued effective protection for the sectors exposed to a significant risk of carbon leakage while incentivising the uptake of low-carbon technologies; – addressing the distributional and social effects of this transition, by reviewing the use of auctioning revenues and the size and functioning of the low-carbon funding mechanisms; – ensuring that the other sectors than those currently included in the EU ETS contribute cost-effectively to the emission reductions needed in line with EU targets and Paris Agreement commitments notably by including emissions from maritime transport and emissions from buildings and road transport under the rules of the EU ETS while ensuring synergies with other policies targeting those sectors; – reviewing the monitoring, reporting and verification system of CO 2 emissions from maritime transport to take into account the inclusion of the maritime transport sector in the EU ETS; – reviewing the market stability reserve in line with the corresponding legal obligation and examining possible amendments to its design, to fulfil the legal objectives in the MSR decision and to address any issues that may be raised in the context of the increased ambition.
Revised version (Article 1 Subject matter):
This Directive establishes a system for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Union (hereinafter referred to as the ‘ EU ETS ’) in order to promote reductions of greenhouse gas emissions in a cost-effective and economically efficient manner. This Directive also provides for the reductions of greenhouse gas emissions to be increased so as to contribute to the levels of reductions that are considered scientifically necessary to avoid dangerous climate change. It contributes to the achievement of the Union’s climate-neutrality objective and its climate targets as laid down in Regulation (EU) 2021/1119 of the European Parliament and of the Council ( 1 ) and thereby to the objectives of the Paris Agreement ( 2 ). This Directive also lays down provisions for assessing and implementing a stricter Union reduction commitment exceeding 20 %, to be applied upon the approval by the Union of an international agreement on climate change leading to greenhouse gas emission reductions exceeding those required in Article 9, as reflected in the 30 % commitment endorsed by the European Council of March 2007.
Article 2 Scope
1. This Directive shall apply to emissions from the activities listed in Annex I and greenhouse gases listed in Annex II. 2. This Directive shall apply without prejudice to any requirements pursuant to Directive 96/61/EC. 3. The application of this Directive to the airport of Gibraltar is understood to be without prejudice to the respective legal positions of the Kingdom of Spain and the United Kingdom with regard to the dispute over sovereignty over the territory in which the airport is situated.
Amendment rationale: CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL Reasons for and objectives of the proposal The European Green Deal Communication 1 launched a new growth strategy for the EU that aims to transform the EU into a fair and prosperous society with a modern, resource-efficient and competitive economy. It reaffirms the Commission’s ambition to increase its climate targets and make Europe the first climate-neutral continent by 2050. Furthermore, it aims to protect the health and well-being of citizens from environment-related risks and impacts. The necessity and value of the European Green Deal have only grown in light of the very severe effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the health, living and working conditions and well-being of the Union’s citizens. Tackling climate change is an urgent challenge. In line with the scientific findings of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Special Report, global net-zero CO 2 emissions need to be achieved around 2050, and neutrality for all other greenhouse gases as soon as possible later in the century. This urgent challenge requires the EU to step up its action and demonstrate global leadership by becoming climate neutral by 2050. This objective is set out in the Communication ‘ A Clean Planet for all ’ - A European strategic long-term vision for a prosperous, modern, competitive and climate-neutral economy’ 2 . Based on the European Green Deal strategy and a comprehensive impact assessment, the Commission’s Communication of September 2020 on Stepping up Europe’s 2030 climate ambition 3 (‘2030 Climate Target Plan’) proposed to raise the EU's ambition and put forward a comprehensive plan to increase the European Union’s binding target for 2030 towards at least 55 % net emission reduction, in a responsible way. Raising the 2030 ambition now helps give certainty to policymakers and investors, so that decisions made in the coming years do not lock in emission levels inconsistent with the EU’s objective to be climate neutral by 2050. The 2030 target is in line with the Paris Agreement objective to keep the global temperature increase to well below 2°C and pursue efforts to keep it to 1.5°C. The European Council endorsed the new EU binding target for 2030 at its meeting of December 2020 4 . It also called on the Commission “ to assess how all economic sectors can best contribute to the 2030 target and to make the necessary proposals, accompanied by an in-depth examination of the environmental, economic and social impact at Member State level, taking into account national energy and climate plans and reviewing existing flexibilities ”. To this end, the European Climate Law 5 , as agreed with the co-legislators, makes the EU’s climate neutrality target legally binding, and raises the 2030 ambition by setting a target of at least 55 % net emission reductions by 2030 compared to 1990. In order to follow the pathway proposed in the European Climate Law, and deliver this increased level of ambition for 2030, the Commission has reviewed the climate and energy legislation currently in place that are expected to only reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 40 % by 2030 and by 60 % by 2050. This ‘ Fit for 55 ’ legislative package, as announced in the 2030 Climate Target Plan, is the most comprehensive building block in the efforts to implement the ambitious new 2030 climate target, and all economic sectors and policies will need to make their contribution. The European Council also invited the Commission in December 2020 to consider exploring ways to strengthen the EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS), while preserving its integrity and taking into account the need to address distributional concerns and energy poverty. The European Council also invited the Commission to consider proposing measures that enable energy-intensive industries to develop and deploy innovative climate-neutral technologies while maintaining their industrial competitiveness. The current ETS legislation was revised in 2018 to deliver a 43 % reduction in EU ETS emissions by 2030 compared to 2005, coherent with an EU economy-wide emissions reduction target of at least 40 % by 2030 compared to 1990. More recent analysis by the Commission services, however, indicates that, if the legislation remains unchanged, the sectors currently covered by the EU ETS would instead achieve emission reductions of -51 % in 2030 compared to 2005 6 . Even though this would mean outperforming the contribution of -43 % referred to above, it would still be an insufficient contribution to an overall target of at least -55 % compared to 1990. Therefore, the general objective of this initiative is to revise the ETS Directive in a manner commensurate with the 2030 climate ambition to reach at least 55 % net greenhouse gas emission reductions by 2030 below 1990 levels and with a gradual and balanced trajectory towards climate neutrality by 2050, in a cost-effective and coherent way while taking into account the need for a just transition and the need for all sectors to contribute to the EU’s climate efforts. As explained in the impact assessment, contribution of the sectors covered by the EU ETS of -61 % compared to 2005 is considered as best reflecting the 2030 Climate Target Plan results and is taken as the EU ETS ambition contributing to an overall target of at least -55 % compared to 1990. Increasing the EU ETS’s environmental contribution entails adjusting primarily the total number of allowances issued under the EU ETS (the ‘cap’). However, a reduced amount of allowances available to the market affects other pillars of the EU ETS and the carbon price. It impacts core principles such as the need for market stability, the protection against the risk of carbon leakage, the carefully balanced distributional effects between Member States, and the availability of funds for the increased investment needs in low-carbon technologies. At the same time as the EU ETS is brought in line with the overall target of at least -55 % compared to 1990, this increased climate ambition also needs to be reflected in the contribution to the EU’s climate efforts of sectors currently outside of the EU ETS. The impact assessment accompanying the 2030 Climate Target Plan found that in the absence of additional measures, emissions in certain sectors would not decrease as much as required to be on a path to achieve an economy-wide 55 % reduction in emissions. In fact, in maritime transport, emissions today are higher than in 1990, and maritime transport emissions are expected to grow further in a business-as-usual scenario . All pathways assessed as part of the 2030 Climate Target Plan and the Sustainable and Smart Mobility Strategy 7 envisage 80-82 % emissions reductions from international shipping by 2050 relative to 1990 (equivalent to 88-89 % emissions reductions relative to 2008) 8 , in order to be consistent with the increased level of climate ambition. Therefore, the European Commission undertook the commitment to extend the EU ETS to maritime transport as part of a basket of EU measures to address emissions from maritime transport , along with action agreed within the IMO. In this context, the Commission welcomes the progress that the European Parliament and the Council have made since 2019 on the proposal to amend Regulation (EU) 2015/757 9 in order to take appropriate account of the global data collection system for ship fuel oil consumption data ( COM(2019) 38 final) and the Commission takes note of the European Parliament’s Plenary support for the extension of the EU’s Emissions Trading System (EU ETS) to cover maritime transport emissions from 2023. Emissions from maritime transport should be included in the existing emissions trading system. To ensure a smooth transition, a phase-in period should be introduced where shipping companies would only have to surrender allowances for a portion of their verified emissions, gradually rising to 100 % over 4 years. As only around 90 million tons of CO 2 would be added through the extension to maritime transport to the existing ETS, the impact on the availability of allowances for other sectors covered would remain limited. To take into account the inclusion of the maritime sector in the EU ETS, Regulation (EU) 2015/757 should be amended, in particular as regards the reporting of aggregated emissions data at company level and considering the role of administering authorities in respect of shipping companies. These amendments complement those proposed in COM(2019) 38 final. As specified in the 2030 Climate Target Plan, the building sector is currently responsible directly and indirectly for 36 % of energy-related greenhouse gas emissions in the EU and has a large cost-effective potential to reduce emissions. More than half of those emissions are already covered by the existing ETS, notably the provision of electricity for use in buildings and most emissions of district heating. However, many homes are still heated with outdated systems that use polluting fossil fuels such as coal and oil. The sector of road transport also has a significant cost-effective reduction potential. Today, road transport accounts for a fifth of the EU’s greenhouse gas emissions and increased its emissions by over a quarter since 1990. As already considered in the European Green Deal Communication, the Commission is proposing to include the building sector and road transport into emissions trading. The coverage of these sectors by emissions trading, when put in the context of other appropriate regulatory and investment measures for the sectors in question, would provide for increased and more harmonised economic incentives to reduce emissions across these sectors in the EU and increased certainty of delivery of the emission reductions for those sectors. Emissions trading for the buildings and road transport sectors should be introduced through separate but adjacent emissions trading. This will avoid any disturbance of the well-functioning emissions trading system for stationary installations and aviation, given the different reduction potentials in those sectors and different factors that influence the demand. Any possible merger of the two systems should be assessed only after a few years of functioning of the new emissions trading, based on experience. The extension to buildings and road transport requires an upstream approach to regulated entities. Market stability is crucial for the EU ETS to function correctly to achieve its targets. To ensure market stability, Decision (EU) 2015/1814 10 established the market stability reserve (MSR). It began operating in January 2019. The objectives of the MSR are to tackle historical supply-demand imbalances and to make the EU ETS more resilient to major imbalances. The mechanism must preserve regulatory stability and ensure long-term predictability. Article 3 of the Decision requires the Commission to review the functioning of the reserve within three years of the start of the operation. This review needs to be considered together with the effects for market stability of increasing the ambition of the EU ETS, so the necessary amendments to the reserve are proposed together with the amendments to the EU ETS with this proposal. In this context, this proposal, as part of the Fit for 55 package, has the following specific objectives: – strengthening the EU ETS in its current scope in order to provide the appropriate contribution to an overall target of at least -55 % GHG emissions compared to 1990; – ensuring continued effective protection for the sectors exposed to a significant risk of carbon leakage while incentivising the uptake of low-carbon technologies; – addressing the distributional and social effects of this transition, by reviewing the use of auctioning revenues and the size and functioning of the low-carbon funding mechanisms; – ensuring that the other sectors than those currently included in the EU ETS contribute cost-effectively to the emission reductions needed in line with EU targets and Paris Agreement commitments notably by including emissions from maritime transport and emissions from buildings and road transport under the rules of the EU ETS while ensuring synergies with other policies targeting those sectors; – reviewing the monitoring, reporting and verification system of CO 2 emissions from maritime transport to take into account the inclusion of the maritime transport sector in the EU ETS; – reviewing the market stability reserve in line with the corresponding legal obligation and examining possible amendments to its design, to fulfil the legal objectives in the MSR decision and to address any issues that may be raised in the context of the increased ambition.
Revised version (Article 2 Scope):
1. This Directive shall apply to the activities listed in Annexes I and III, and to the greenhouse gases listed in Annex II. Where an installation that is included within the scope of the EU ETS due to the operation of combustion units with a total rated thermal input exceeding 20 MW changes its production processes to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions and no longer meets that threshold, the Member State in which that installation is situated shall provide the operator with the options of remaining within the scope of the EU ETS until the end of the current and next five-year period referred to in Article 11(1), second subparagraph, following the change to its production processes. The operator of that installation may decide that the installation is to remain within the scope of the EU ETS until the end of the current five-year period only or also of the next five-year period, following the change to its production processes. The Member State concerned shall notify the Commission of changes compared to the list submitted to the Commission pursuant to Article 11(1). 2. This Directive shall apply without prejudice to any requirements pursuant to Directive 2010/75/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council ( 3 ). 3. The application of this Directive to the airport of Gibraltar is understood to be without prejudice to the respective legal positions of the Kingdom of Spain and the United Kingdom with regard to the dispute over sovereignty over the territory in which the airport is situated.
Article 3 Definitions
For the purposes of this Directive the following definitions shall apply: (a) ‘allowance’ means an allowance to emit one tonne of carbon dioxide equivalent during a specified period, which shall be valid only for the purposes of meeting the requirements of this Directive and shall be transferable in accordance with the provisions of this Directive; (b) ‘emissions’ means the release of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere from sources in an installation or the release from an aircraft performing an aviation activity listed in Annex I of the gases specified in respect of that activity; (c) ‘greenhouse gases’ means the gases listed in Annex II and other gaseous constituents of the atmosphere, both natural and anthropogenic, that absorb and re-emit infrared radiation; (d) ‘greenhouse gas emissions permit’ means the permit issued in accordance with Articles 5 and 6; (e) ‘installation’ means a stationary technical unit where one or more activities listed in Annex I are carried out and any other directly associated activities which have a technical connection with the activities carried out on that site and which could have an effect on emissions and pollution; (f) ‘operator’ means any person who operates or controls an installation or, where this is provided for in national legislation, to whom decisive economic power over the technical functioning of the installation has been delegated; (g) ‘person’ means any natural or legal person; (h) ‘new entrant’ means: — any installation carrying out one or more of the activities indicated in Annex I, which has obtained a greenhouse gas emissions permit for the first time after 30 June 2011, — any installation carrying out an activity which is included in the Community scheme pursuant to Article 24(1) or (2) for the first time, or — any installation carrying out one or more of the activities indicated in Annex I or an activity which is included in the Community scheme pursuant to Article 24(1) or (2), which has had a significant extension after 30 June 2011, only in so far as this extension is concerned; (h) ‘new entrant’ means: — any installation carrying out one or more of the activities indicated in Annex I, which has obtained a greenhouse gas emissions permit for the first time after 30 June 2011, — any installation carrying out an activity which is included in the Community scheme pursuant to Article 24(1) or (2) for the first time, or — any installation carrying out one or more of the activities indicated in Annex I or an activity which is included in the Community scheme pursuant to Article 24(1) or (2), which has had a significant extension after 30 June 2011, only in so far as this extension is concerned; (i) ‘the public’ means one or more persons and, in accordance with national legislation or practice, associations, organisations or groups of persons; (j) ‘tonne of carbon dioxide equivalent’ means one metric tonne of carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) or an amount of any other greenhouse gas listed in Annex II with an equivalent global-warming potential; (k) ‘Annex I Party’ means a Party listed in Annex I to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) that has ratified the Kyoto Protocol as specified in Article 1(7) of the Kyoto Protocol; (l) ‘project activity’ means a project activity approved by one or more Annex I Parties in accordance with Article 6 or Article 12 of the Kyoto Protocol and the decisions adopted pursuant to the UNFCCC or the Kyoto Protocol; (m) ‘emission reduction unit’ or ‘ERU’ means a unit issued pursuant to Article 6 of the Kyoto Protocol and the decisions adopted pursuant to the UNFCCC or the Kyoto Protocol; (n) ‘certified emission reduction’ or ‘CER’ means a unit issued pursuant to Article 12 of the Kyoto Protocol and the decisions adopted pursuant to the UNFCCC or the Kyoto Protocol; (o) ‘aircraft operator’ means the person who operates an aircraft at the time it performs an aviation activity listed in Annex I or, where that person is not known or is not identified by the owner of the aircraft, the owner of the aircraft; (p) ‘commercial air transport operator’ means an operator that, for remuneration, provides scheduled or non-scheduled air transport services to the public for the carriage of passengers, freight or mail; (q) ‘administering Member State’ means the Member State responsible for administering the Community scheme in respect of an aircraft operator in accordance with Article 18a; (r) ‘attributed aviation emissions’ means emissions from all flights falling within the aviation activities listed in Annex I which depart from an aerodrome situated in the territory of a Member State and those which arrive in such an aerodrome from a third country; (s) ‘historical aviation emissions’ means the mean average of the annual emissions in the calendar years 2004, 2005 and 2006 from aircraft performing an aviation activity listed in Annex I; (t) ‘combustion’ means any oxidation of fuels, regardless of the way in which the heat, electrical or mechanical energy produced by this process is used, and any other directly associated activities, including waste gas scrubbing; (u) ‘electricity generator’ means an installation that, on or after 1 January 2005, has produced electricity for sale to third parties, and in which no activity listed in Annex I is carried out other than the ‘combustion of fuels’.
Amendment rationale: CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL Emissions from aviation are one of the fastest growing sources of greenhouse gas emissions. As the technological potential for emissions reduction is limited in the aviation sector, market-based measures (MBMs) allow aviation to contribute to emission reductions by the airlines offsetting their strong emission growth through funding emission reductions in other sectors. The suitability of MBMs for international aviation has long been recognised. The 2001 ICAO Assembly endorsed the application of open emissions trading systems to international aviation. Following the ICAO's 2004 endorsement of regional MBMs, the EU led the way by including aviation in its Emission Trading System (EU ETS). Despite its positive environmental effects at low economic costs, the implementation of the EU ETS has had to face significant international opposition (e.g. allegations that regulating emissions from airlines based outside the EU would violate the sovereignty of third states). The European Court of Justice has, however, dismissed appeals by foreign airlines in this respect and confirmed the legality of the EU ETS[1]. At the same time, the integration of aviation into the EU ETS has been decisive in driving forward ICAO discussions. The intensive engagement of the EU in tackling climate change has been crucial in generating momentum in ICAO towards global action for addressing aviation emissions. Clearly, given the EU ETS would only ever cover a proportion of international aviation emissions, the overall strong global growth of these emissions will continue if no MBM is implemented on a global level, and emission reduction goals will remain aspirational. The 2013 38th ICAO Assembly has now decided on the development of a global MBM to be finalised at the next ICAO Assembly in 2016 and to be implemented by 2020. Progress was not made on a "framework" for national/ regional MBMs up to 2020, as in particular the Assembly resolution repeated the same language as from the 2007 and 2010 Assemblies and the European States confirmed their position on the 2007 and 2010 Assembly resolutions as concerns so-called 'mutual agreement'. In response to this progress on a global MBM and to promote further momentum, the Commission considers it appropriate to propose lowering the proportion of emissions to which the EU emissions trading system should apply up to 2020, as the further action already envisaged in Decision No. 377/2013/EU.
Revised version (Article 3 Definitions):
For the purposes of this Directive the following definitions shall apply: (a) ‘allowance’ means an allowance to emit one tonne of carbon dioxide equivalent during a specified period, which shall be valid only for the purposes of meeting the requirements of this Directive and shall be transferable in accordance with the provisions of this Directive; (b) ‘emissions’ means the release of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere from sources in an installation or the release from an aircraft performing an aviation activity listed in Annex I of the gases specified in respect of that activity; (c) ‘greenhouse gases’ means the gases listed in Annex II and other gaseous constituents of the atmosphere, both natural and anthropogenic, that absorb and re-emit infrared radiation; (d) ‘greenhouse gas emissions permit’ means the permit issued in accordance with Articles 5 and 6; (e) ‘installation’ means a stationary technical unit where one or more activities listed in Annex I are carried out and any other directly associated activities which have a technical connection with the activities carried out on that site and which could have an effect on emissions and pollution; (f) ‘operator’ means any person who operates or controls an installation or, where this is provided for in national legislation, to whom decisive economic power over the technical functioning of the installation has been delegated; (g) ‘person’ means any natural or legal person; (h) ‘new entrant’ means: — any installation carrying out one or more of the activities indicated in Annex I, which has obtained a greenhouse gas emissions permit for the first time after 30 June 2011, — any installation carrying out an activity which is included in the Community scheme pursuant to Article 24(1) or (2) for the first time, or — any installation carrying out one or more of the activities indicated in Annex I or an activity which is included in the Community scheme pursuant to Article 24(1) or (2), which has had a significant extension after 30 June 2011, only in so far as this extension is concerned; (i) ‘the public’ means one or more persons and, in accordance with national legislation or practice, associations, organisations or groups of persons; (j) ‘tonne of carbon dioxide equivalent’ means one metric tonne of carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) or an amount of any other greenhouse gas listed in Annex II with an equivalent global-warming potential; (k) ‘Annex I Party’ means a Party listed in Annex I to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) that has ratified the Kyoto Protocol as specified in Article 1(7) of the Kyoto Protocol; (l) ‘project activity’ means a project activity approved by one or more Annex I Parties in accordance with Article 6 or Article 12 of the Kyoto Protocol and the decisions adopted pursuant to the UNFCCC or the Kyoto Protocol; (m) ‘emission reduction unit’ or ‘ERU’ means a unit issued pursuant to Article 6 of the Kyoto Protocol and the decisions adopted pursuant to the UNFCCC or the Kyoto Protocol; (n) ‘certified emission reduction’ or ‘CER’ means a unit issued pursuant to Article 12 of the Kyoto Protocol and the decisions adopted pursuant to the UNFCCC or the Kyoto Protocol; (o) ‘aircraft operator’ means the person who operates an aircraft at the time it performs an aviation activity listed in Annex I or, where that person is not known or is not identified by the owner of the aircraft, the owner of the aircraft; (p) ‘commercial air transport operator’ means an operator that, for remuneration, provides scheduled or non-scheduled air transport services to the public for the carriage of passengers, freight or mail; (q) ‘administering Member State’ means the Member State responsible for administering the Community scheme in respect of an aircraft operator in accordance with Article 18a; (r) ‘attributed aviation emissions’ means emissions from all flights falling within the aviation activities listed in Annex I which depart from an aerodrome situated in the territory of a Member State and those which arrive in such an aerodrome from a third country; (s) ‘historical aviation emissions’ means the mean average of the annual emissions in the calendar years 2004, 2005 and 2006 from aircraft performing an aviation activity listed in Annex I; (t) ‘combustion’ means any oxidation of fuels, regardless of the way in which the heat, electrical or mechanical energy produced by this process is used, and any other directly associated activities, including waste gas scrubbing; (u) ‘electricity generator’ means an installation that, on or after 1 January 2005, has produced electricity for sale to third parties, and in which no activity listed in Annex I is carried out other than the ‘combustion of fuels’.
Article 3a Scope
The provisions of this Chapter shall apply to the allocation and issue of allowances in respect of aviation activities listed in Annex I.
Amendment rationale: CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL Reasons for and objectives of the proposal The European Green Deal Communication 1 launched a new growth strategy for the EU that aims to transform the EU into a fair and prosperous society with a modern, resource-efficient and competitive economy. It reaffirms the Commission’s ambition to increase its climate targets and make Europe the first climate-neutral continent by 2050. Furthermore, it aims to protect the health and well-being of citizens from environment-related risks and impacts. The necessity and value of the European Green Deal have only grown in light of the very severe effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the health, living and working conditions and well-being of the Union’s citizens. Tackling climate change is an urgent challenge. In line with the scientific findings of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Special Report, global net-zero CO 2 emissions need to be achieved around 2050, and neutrality for all other greenhouse gases as soon as possible later in the century. This urgent challenge requires the EU to step up its action and demonstrate global leadership by becoming climate neutral by 2050. This objective is set out in the Communication ‘ A Clean Planet for all ’ - A European strategic long-term vision for a prosperous, modern, competitive and climate-neutral economy’ 2 . Based on the European Green Deal strategy and a comprehensive impact assessment, the Commission’s Communication of September 2020 on Stepping up Europe’s 2030 climate ambition 3 (‘2030 Climate Target Plan’) proposed to raise the EU's ambition and put forward a comprehensive plan to increase the European Union’s binding target for 2030 towards at least 55 % net emission reduction, in a responsible way. Raising the 2030 ambition now helps give certainty to policymakers and investors, so that decisions made in the coming years do not lock in emission levels inconsistent with the EU’s objective to be climate neutral by 2050. The 2030 target is in line with the Paris Agreement objective to keep the global temperature increase to well below 2°C and pursue efforts to keep it to 1.5°C. The European Council endorsed the new EU binding target for 2030 at its meeting of December 2020 4 . It also called on the Commission “ to assess how all economic sectors can best contribute to the 2030 target and to make the necessary proposals, accompanied by an in-depth examination of the environmental, economic and social impact at Member State level, taking into account national energy and climate plans and reviewing existing flexibilities ”. To this end, the European Climate Law 5 , as agreed with the co-legislators, makes the EU’s climate neutrality target legally binding, and raises the 2030 ambition by setting a target of at least 55 % net emission reductions by 2030 compared to 1990. In order to follow the pathway proposed in the European Climate Law, and deliver this increased level of ambition for 2030, the Commission has reviewed the climate and energy legislation currently in place that are expected to only reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 40 % by 2030 and by 60 % by 2050. This ‘ Fit for 55 ’ legislative package, as announced in the 2030 Climate Target Plan, is the most comprehensive building block in the efforts to implement the ambitious new 2030 climate target, and all economic sectors and policies will need to make their contribution. The European Council also invited the Commission in December 2020 to consider exploring ways to strengthen the EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS), while preserving its integrity and taking into account the need to address distributional concerns and energy poverty. The European Council also invited the Commission to consider proposing measures that enable energy-intensive industries to develop and deploy innovative climate-neutral technologies while maintaining their industrial competitiveness. The current ETS legislation was revised in 2018 to deliver a 43 % reduction in EU ETS emissions by 2030 compared to 2005, coherent with an EU economy-wide emissions reduction target of at least 40 % by 2030 compared to 1990. More recent analysis by the Commission services, however, indicates that, if the legislation remains unchanged, the sectors currently covered by the EU ETS would instead achieve emission reductions of -51 % in 2030 compared to 2005 6 . Even though this would mean outperforming the contribution of -43 % referred to above, it would still be an insufficient contribution to an overall target of at least -55 % compared to 1990. Therefore, the general objective of this initiative is to revise the ETS Directive in a manner commensurate with the 2030 climate ambition to reach at least 55 % net greenhouse gas emission reductions by 2030 below 1990 levels and with a gradual and balanced trajectory towards climate neutrality by 2050, in a cost-effective and coherent way while taking into account the need for a just transition and the need for all sectors to contribute to the EU’s climate efforts. As explained in the impact assessment, contribution of the sectors covered by the EU ETS of -61 % compared to 2005 is considered as best reflecting the 2030 Climate Target Plan results and is taken as the EU ETS ambition contributing to an overall target of at least -55 % compared to 1990. Increasing the EU ETS’s environmental contribution entails adjusting primarily the total number of allowances issued under the EU ETS (the ‘cap’). However, a reduced amount of allowances available to the market affects other pillars of the EU ETS and the carbon price. It impacts core principles such as the need for market stability, the protection against the risk of carbon leakage, the carefully balanced distributional effects between Member States, and the availability of funds for the increased investment needs in low-carbon technologies. At the same time as the EU ETS is brought in line with the overall target of at least -55 % compared to 1990, this increased climate ambition also needs to be reflected in the contribution to the EU’s climate efforts of sectors currently outside of the EU ETS. The impact assessment accompanying the 2030 Climate Target Plan found that in the absence of additional measures, emissions in certain sectors would not decrease as much as required to be on a path to achieve an economy-wide 55 % reduction in emissions. In fact, in maritime transport, emissions today are higher than in 1990, and maritime transport emissions are expected to grow further in a business-as-usual scenario . All pathways assessed as part of the 2030 Climate Target Plan and the Sustainable and Smart Mobility Strategy 7 envisage 80-82 % emissions reductions from international shipping by 2050 relative to 1990 (equivalent to 88-89 % emissions reductions relative to 2008) 8 , in order to be consistent with the increased level of climate ambition. Therefore, the European Commission undertook the commitment to extend the EU ETS to maritime transport as part of a basket of EU measures to address emissions from maritime transport , along with action agreed within the IMO. In this context, the Commission welcomes the progress that the European Parliament and the Council have made since 2019 on the proposal to amend Regulation (EU) 2015/757 9 in order to take appropriate account of the global data collection system for ship fuel oil consumption data ( COM(2019) 38 final) and the Commission takes note of the European Parliament’s Plenary support for the extension of the EU’s Emissions Trading System (EU ETS) to cover maritime transport emissions from 2023. Emissions from maritime transport should be included in the existing emissions trading system. To ensure a smooth transition, a phase-in period should be introduced where shipping companies would only have to surrender allowances for a portion of their verified emissions, gradually rising to 100 % over 4 years. As only around 90 million tons of CO 2 would be added through the extension to maritime transport to the existing ETS, the impact on the availability of allowances for other sectors covered would remain limited. To take into account the inclusion of the maritime sector in the EU ETS, Regulation (EU) 2015/757 should be amended, in particular as regards the reporting of aggregated emissions data at company level and considering the role of administering authorities in respect of shipping companies. These amendments complement those proposed in COM(2019) 38 final. As specified in the 2030 Climate Target Plan, the building sector is currently responsible directly and indirectly for 36 % of energy-related greenhouse gas emissions in the EU and has a large cost-effective potential to reduce emissions. More than half of those emissions are already covered by the existing ETS, notably the provision of electricity for use in buildings and most emissions of district heating. However, many homes are still heated with outdated systems that use polluting fossil fuels such as coal and oil. The sector of road transport also has a significant cost-effective reduction potential. Today, road transport accounts for a fifth of the EU’s greenhouse gas emissions and increased its emissions by over a quarter since 1990. As already considered in the European Green Deal Communication, the Commission is proposing to include the building sector and road transport into emissions trading. The coverage of these sectors by emissions trading, when put in the context of other appropriate regulatory and investment measures for the sectors in question, would provide for increased and more harmonised economic incentives to reduce emissions across these sectors in the EU and increased certainty of delivery of the emission reductions for those sectors. Emissions trading for the buildings and road transport sectors should be introduced through separate but adjacent emissions trading. This will avoid any disturbance of the well-functioning emissions trading system for stationary installations and aviation, given the different reduction potentials in those sectors and different factors that influence the demand. Any possible merger of the two systems should be assessed only after a few years of functioning of the new emissions trading, based on experience. The extension to buildings and road transport requires an upstream approach to regulated entities. Market stability is crucial for the EU ETS to function correctly to achieve its targets. To ensure market stability, Decision (EU) 2015/1814 10 established the market stability reserve (MSR). It began operating in January 2019. The objectives of the MSR are to tackle historical supply-demand imbalances and to make the EU ETS more resilient to major imbalances. The mechanism must preserve regulatory stability and ensure long-term predictability. Article 3 of the Decision requires the Commission to review the functioning of the reserve within three years of the start of the operation. This review needs to be considered together with the effects for market stability of increasing the ambition of the EU ETS, so the necessary amendments to the reserve are proposed together with the amendments to the EU ETS with this proposal. In this context, this proposal, as part of the Fit for 55 package, has the following specific objectives: – strengthening the EU ETS in its current scope in order to provide the appropriate contribution to an overall target of at least -55 % GHG emissions compared to 1990; – ensuring continued effective protection for the sectors exposed to a significant risk of carbon leakage while incentivising the uptake of low-carbon technologies; – addressing the distributional and social effects of this transition, by reviewing the use of auctioning revenues and the size and functioning of the low-carbon funding mechanisms; – ensuring that the other sectors than those currently included in the EU ETS contribute cost-effectively to the emission reductions needed in line with EU targets and Paris Agreement commitments notably by including emissions from maritime transport and emissions from buildings and road transport under the rules of the EU ETS while ensuring synergies with other policies targeting those sectors; – reviewing the monitoring, reporting and verification system of CO 2 emissions from maritime transport to take into account the inclusion of the maritime transport sector in the EU ETS; – reviewing the market stability reserve in line with the corresponding legal obligation and examining possible amendments to its design, to fulfil the legal objectives in the MSR decision and to address any issues that may be raised in the context of the increased ambition.
Revised version (Article 3a Scope):
Articles 3b to 3g shall apply to the allocation and issue of allowances in respect of the aviation activities listed in Annex I. Articles 3ga to 3gg shall apply in respect of the maritime transport activities listed in Annex I.
Article 3b Aviation activities
By 2 August 2009, the Commission shall, in accordance with the regulatory procedure referred to in Article 23(2), develop guidelines on the detailed interpretation of the aviation activities listed in Annex I.
Amendment rationale: CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL Reasons for and objectives of the proposal The European Green Deal Communication 1 launched a new growth strategy for the EU that aims to transform the EU into a fair and prosperous society with a modern, resource-efficient and competitive economy. It reaffirms the Commission’s ambition to increase its climate targets and make Europe the first climate-neutral continent by 2050. Furthermore, it aims to protect the health and well-being of citizens from environment-related risks and impacts. The necessity and value of the European Green Deal have only grown in light of the very severe effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the health, living and working conditions and well-being of the Union’s citizens. Tackling climate change is an urgent challenge. In line with the scientific findings of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Special Report, global net-zero CO 2 emissions need to be achieved around 2050, and neutrality for all other greenhouse gases as soon as possible later in the century. This urgent challenge requires the EU to step up its action and demonstrate global leadership by becoming climate neutral by 2050. This objective is set out in the Communication ‘ A Clean Planet for all ’ - A European strategic long-term vision for a prosperous, modern, competitive and climate-neutral economy’ 2 . Based on the European Green Deal strategy and a comprehensive impact assessment, the Commission’s Communication of September 2020 on Stepping up Europe’s 2030 climate ambition 3 (‘2030 Climate Target Plan’) proposed to raise the EU's ambition and put forward a comprehensive plan to increase the European Union’s binding target for 2030 towards at least 55 % net emission reduction, in a responsible way. Raising the 2030 ambition now helps give certainty to policymakers and investors, so that decisions made in the coming years do not lock in emission levels inconsistent with the EU’s objective to be climate neutral by 2050. The 2030 target is in line with the Paris Agreement objective to keep the global temperature increase to well below 2°C and pursue efforts to keep it to 1.5°C. The European Council endorsed the new EU binding target for 2030 at its meeting of December 2020 4 . It also called on the Commission “ to assess how all economic sectors can best contribute to the 2030 target and to make the necessary proposals, accompanied by an in-depth examination of the environmental, economic and social impact at Member State level, taking into account national energy and climate plans and reviewing existing flexibilities ”. To this end, the European Climate Law 5 , as agreed with the co-legislators, makes the EU’s climate neutrality target legally binding, and raises the 2030 ambition by setting a target of at least 55 % net emission reductions by 2030 compared to 1990. In order to follow the pathway proposed in the European Climate Law, and deliver this increased level of ambition for 2030, the Commission has reviewed the climate and energy legislation currently in place that are expected to only reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 40 % by 2030 and by 60 % by 2050. This ‘ Fit for 55 ’ legislative package, as announced in the 2030 Climate Target Plan, is the most comprehensive building block in the efforts to implement the ambitious new 2030 climate target, and all economic sectors and policies will need to make their contribution. The European Council also invited the Commission in December 2020 to consider exploring ways to strengthen the EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS), while preserving its integrity and taking into account the need to address distributional concerns and energy poverty. The European Council also invited the Commission to consider proposing measures that enable energy-intensive industries to develop and deploy innovative climate-neutral technologies while maintaining their industrial competitiveness. The current ETS legislation was revised in 2018 to deliver a 43 % reduction in EU ETS emissions by 2030 compared to 2005, coherent with an EU economy-wide emissions reduction target of at least 40 % by 2030 compared to 1990. More recent analysis by the Commission services, however, indicates that, if the legislation remains unchanged, the sectors currently covered by the EU ETS would instead achieve emission reductions of -51 % in 2030 compared to 2005 6 . Even though this would mean outperforming the contribution of -43 % referred to above, it would still be an insufficient contribution to an overall target of at least -55 % compared to 1990. Therefore, the general objective of this initiative is to revise the ETS Directive in a manner commensurate with the 2030 climate ambition to reach at least 55 % net greenhouse gas emission reductions by 2030 below 1990 levels and with a gradual and balanced trajectory towards climate neutrality by 2050, in a cost-effective and coherent way while taking into account the need for a just transition and the need for all sectors to contribute to the EU’s climate efforts. As explained in the impact assessment, contribution of the sectors covered by the EU ETS of -61 % compared to 2005 is considered as best reflecting the 2030 Climate Target Plan results and is taken as the EU ETS ambition contributing to an overall target of at least -55 % compared to 1990. Increasing the EU ETS’s environmental contribution entails adjusting primarily the total number of allowances issued under the EU ETS (the ‘cap’). However, a reduced amount of allowances available to the market affects other pillars of the EU ETS and the carbon price. It impacts core principles such as the need for market stability, the protection against the risk of carbon leakage, the carefully balanced distributional effects between Member States, and the availability of funds for the increased investment needs in low-carbon technologies. At the same time as the EU ETS is brought in line with the overall target of at least -55 % compared to 1990, this increased climate ambition also needs to be reflected in the contribution to the EU’s climate efforts of sectors currently outside of the EU ETS. The impact assessment accompanying the 2030 Climate Target Plan found that in the absence of additional measures, emissions in certain sectors would not decrease as much as required to be on a path to achieve an economy-wide 55 % reduction in emissions. In fact, in maritime transport, emissions today are higher than in 1990, and maritime transport emissions are expected to grow further in a business-as-usual scenario . All pathways assessed as part of the 2030 Climate Target Plan and the Sustainable and Smart Mobility Strategy 7 envisage 80-82 % emissions reductions from international shipping by 2050 relative to 1990 (equivalent to 88-89 % emissions reductions relative to 2008) 8 , in order to be consistent with the increased level of climate ambition. Therefore, the European Commission undertook the commitment to extend the EU ETS to maritime transport as part of a basket of EU measures to address emissions from maritime transport , along with action agreed within the IMO. In this context, the Commission welcomes the progress that the European Parliament and the Council have made since 2019 on the proposal to amend Regulation (EU) 2015/757 9 in order to take appropriate account of the global data collection system for ship fuel oil consumption data ( COM(2019) 38 final) and the Commission takes note of the European Parliament’s Plenary support for the extension of the EU’s Emissions Trading System (EU ETS) to cover maritime transport emissions from 2023. Emissions from maritime transport should be included in the existing emissions trading system. To ensure a smooth transition, a phase-in period should be introduced where shipping companies would only have to surrender allowances for a portion of their verified emissions, gradually rising to 100 % over 4 years. As only around 90 million tons of CO 2 would be added through the extension to maritime transport to the existing ETS, the impact on the availability of allowances for other sectors covered would remain limited. To take into account the inclusion of the maritime sector in the EU ETS, Regulation (EU) 2015/757 should be amended, in particular as regards the reporting of aggregated emissions data at company level and considering the role of administering authorities in respect of shipping companies. These amendments complement those proposed in COM(2019) 38 final. As specified in the 2030 Climate Target Plan, the building sector is currently responsible directly and indirectly for 36 % of energy-related greenhouse gas emissions in the EU and has a large cost-effective potential to reduce emissions. More than half of those emissions are already covered by the existing ETS, notably the provision of electricity for use in buildings and most emissions of district heating. However, many homes are still heated with outdated systems that use polluting fossil fuels such as coal and oil. The sector of road transport also has a significant cost-effective reduction potential. Today, road transport accounts for a fifth of the EU’s greenhouse gas emissions and increased its emissions by over a quarter since 1990. As already considered in the European Green Deal Communication, the Commission is proposing to include the building sector and road transport into emissions trading. The coverage of these sectors by emissions trading, when put in the context of other appropriate regulatory and investment measures for the sectors in question, would provide for increased and more harmonised economic incentives to reduce emissions across these sectors in the EU and increased certainty of delivery of the emission reductions for those sectors. Emissions trading for the buildings and road transport sectors should be introduced through separate but adjacent emissions trading. This will avoid any disturbance of the well-functioning emissions trading system for stationary installations and aviation, given the different reduction potentials in those sectors and different factors that influence the demand. Any possible merger of the two systems should be assessed only after a few years of functioning of the new emissions trading, based on experience. The extension to buildings and road transport requires an upstream approach to regulated entities. Market stability is crucial for the EU ETS to function correctly to achieve its targets. To ensure market stability, Decision (EU) 2015/1814 10 established the market stability reserve (MSR). It began operating in January 2019. The objectives of the MSR are to tackle historical supply-demand imbalances and to make the EU ETS more resilient to major imbalances. The mechanism must preserve regulatory stability and ensure long-term predictability. Article 3 of the Decision requires the Commission to review the functioning of the reserve within three years of the start of the operation. This review needs to be considered together with the effects for market stability of increasing the ambition of the EU ETS, so the necessary amendments to the reserve are proposed together with the amendments to the EU ETS with this proposal. In this context, this proposal, as part of the Fit for 55 package, has the following specific objectives: – strengthening the EU ETS in its current scope in order to provide the appropriate contribution to an overall target of at least -55 % GHG emissions compared to 1990; – ensuring continued effective protection for the sectors exposed to a significant risk of carbon leakage while incentivising the uptake of low-carbon technologies; – addressing the distributional and social effects of this transition, by reviewing the use of auctioning revenues and the size and functioning of the low-carbon funding mechanisms; – ensuring that the other sectors than those currently included in the EU ETS contribute cost-effectively to the emission reductions needed in line with EU targets and Paris Agreement commitments notably by including emissions from maritime transport and emissions from buildings and road transport under the rules of the EU ETS while ensuring synergies with other policies targeting those sectors; – reviewing the monitoring, reporting and verification system of CO 2 emissions from maritime transport to take into account the inclusion of the maritime transport sector in the EU ETS; – reviewing the market stability reserve in line with the corresponding legal obligation and examining possible amendments to its design, to fulfil the legal objectives in the MSR decision and to address any issues that may be raised in the context of the increased ambition.
Revised version (Article 3b Aviation activities):
By 2 August 2009, the Commission shall, in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 22a(2) , develop guidelines on the detailed interpretation of the aviation activities listed in Annex I.
Article 3c Total quantity of allowances for aviation
1. For the period from 1 January 2012 to 31 December 2012, the total quantity of allowances to be allocated to aircraft operators shall be equivalent to 97 % of the historical aviation emissions. 2. For the period referred to in Article 13(1) beginning on 1 January 2013, and, in the absence of any amendments following the review referred to in Article 30(4), for each subsequent period, the total quantity of allowances to be allocated to aircraft operators shall be equivalent to 95 % of the historical aviation emissions multiplied by the number of years in the period. This percentage may be reviewed as part of the general review of this Directive. 3. The Commission shall review the total quantity of allowances to be allocated to aircraft operators in accordance with Article 30(4). 4. By 2 August 2009, the Commission shall decide on the historical aviation emissions, based on best available data, including estimates based on actual traffic information. That decision shall be considered within the Committee referred to in Article 23(1).
Amendment rationale: CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL Reasons for and objectives of the proposal Greenhouse gas emissions from aviation activities are increasing significantly. In the absence of further measures, carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) emissions from international aviation are estimated to almost quadruple by 2050 compared to 2010. Several studies demonstrate that technical and operational measures alone, including CO 2 standards for aircrafts or the deployment of sustainable biofuels, are insufficient to curb aviation emissions, thus the need to use market-based measures to address their growth. The strong growth in GHG emissions from the aviation sector risks undermining the EU's and global efforts to effectively tackle climate change. Back in 2008, the EU led the way in addressing GHG emissions from aviation by including flights between aerodromes within the European Economic Area (hereafter "intra-EEA flights") and flights between aerodromes in the European Economic Area (EEA) and aerodromes in third countries ("extra-EEA flights") in the EU Emissions Trading System. This was instrumental in getting agreement in International Civil Aviation Organisation for a process towards a global market based measure to address international aviation, which started in 2013. It also allowed for aviation to contribute to the EU climate objective of emission reduction of 20% by 2020 compared to 1990 levels. Pending agreement in ICAO, and to promote the development of a global measure to regulate international aviation emissions in ICAO, the EU temporarily reduced the scope of the EU ETS to intra-EEA flights until 2016, waiting for the outcome of ICAO to review its scope in relation to extra-EEA flights. In the absence of any amendments to the EU ETS Directive, the EU ETS will automatically revert back to its full-scope application from 2017. The European Council agreed in October 2014 the 2030 policy framework for climate and energy. A centrepiece of the 2030 framework is the binding target to reduce overall EU greenhouse gas emissions by at least 40% domestically below 1990 levels by 2030. To achieve this target cost-effectively, the sectors covered by the EU emissions trading system (EU ETS) will have to reduce their emissions by 43% compared to 2005, while non-ETS sectors will have to reduce their emissions by 30% compared to 2005. This allowed the EU to submit its contribution under the Paris Agreement, qualifying as an economy wide commitment, including aviation emissions. The EU is committed to duly contribute to the climate goal under the Paris Agreement of keeping global warming well below 2 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels and pursue efforts to limit temperature increase to 1.5 degrees Celsius, as well as the aspirational goal set by the International Civil Aviation Organisation that global net CO 2 emissions from international aviation should not exceed 2020 levels ('carbon neutral growth' or CNG 2020). In October 2016, ICAO agreed at its 39 th Assembly on a Resolution for a global market-based measure (GMBM) to address the growth in international aviation emissions globally from 2021 through an offsetting system, aimed at enabling the aspiration goal of stabilising international aviation emissions at 2020 levels. During the GMBM's first phase (2021-2026), participation in the GMBM is explicitly voluntary. All major aviation countries should apply the GMBM from the start of its second phase in 2027. The EU and its Member States expressed their intention to apply the GMBM during its voluntary phase. While the aspirational goal and the basic nature of the GMBM as offsetting are agreed, a number of important features of the GMBM, key for its effectiveness and environmental integrity from a climate perspective, still need to be developed and agreed in ICAO before the GMBM can be implemented in 2021. Any delays in agreeing on these elements risk delaying the operationalization of the GMBM. This would also risk delaying implementation by States in domestic legislation which is crucial since the concrete operationalization of the GMBM rests on such national and regional action. The existing legislation requires the Commission to assess the outcome of the 39 th ICAO Assembly and, in that light, to review the scope of the EU ETS for flights to and from the EEA. In the absence of amendment to the existing legislation, the initial scope of the ETS (ie including extra EEA flights) would apply again. In view of the agreement on the GMBM at ICAO, the EU support towards its completion and timely operationalization, and the EU's intended implementation of the GMBM from 2021 onwards, it is deemed necessary to review the EU ETS legislation. To provide further momentum to international discussions on the remaining rules and governance necessary for the implementation of the GMBM it is proposed to continue the reduced scope application of the EU ETS (i.e. to flights between aerodromes located within the EEA, as set out in Regulation No 421/2014) beyond 2016. Once there is more clarity about the nature and content of the legal instruments adopted by ICAO for the implementation of the GMBM as well as about the intentions of our international partners regarding the implementation of the GMBM, a further assessment and review the EU ETS for the post-2020 period will be carried out. This will also take due account of the necessary consistency with the economy wide commitment taken by the EU under the Paris Agreement and its agreed objective of reducing GHG emissions domestically by 40 % by 2030 compared to 1990 levels. To provide legal certainty for compliance with the ETS in 2017, it is important that this proposal is agreed between the European Parliament and Council swiftly and ideally by the end of 2017.
Revised version (Article 3c Total quantity of allowances for aviation):
1. For the period from 1 January 2012 to 31 December 2012, the total quantity of allowances to be allocated to aircraft operators shall be equivalent to 97 % of the historical aviation emissions. 2. For the period referred to in Article 13(1) beginning on 1 January 2013, and, in the absence of any amendments following the review referred to in Article 30(4), for each subsequent period, the total quantity of allowances to be allocated to aircraft operators shall be equivalent to 95 % of the historical aviation emissions multiplied by the number of years in the period. This percentage may be reviewed as part of the general review of this Directive. 3. The Commission shall review the total quantity of allowances to be allocated to aircraft operators in accordance with Article 30(4). 3a. Any allocation of allowances for aviation activities to and from aerodromes located in countries outside the European Economic Area (‘EEA’) after 31 December 2023 shall be subject to the review referred to in Article 28b. 4. By 2 August 2009, the Commission shall decide on the historical aviation emissions, based on best available data, including estimates based on actual traffic information. That decision shall be considered within the Committee referred to in Article 23(1).
Article 3d Method of allocation of allowances for aviation through auctioning
1. In the period referred to in Article 3c(1), 15 % of allowances shall be auctioned. 2. From 1 January 2013, 15 % of allowances shall be auctioned. This percentage may be increased as part of the general review of this Directive. 3. A Regulation shall be adopted containing detailed provisions for the auctioning by Member States of allowances not required to be issued free of charge in accordance with paragraphs 1 and 2 of this Article or Article 3f(8). The number of allowances to be auctioned in each period by each Member State shall be proportionate to its share of the total attributed aviation emissions for all Member States for the reference year reported pursuant to Article 14(3) and verified pursuant to Article 15. For the period referred to in Article 3c(1), the reference year shall be 2010 and for each subsequent period referred to in Article 3c the reference year shall be the calendar year ending 24 months before the start of the period to which the auction relates. That Regulation, designed to amend non-essential elements of this Directive by supplementing it, shall be adopted in accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny referred to in Article 23(3). 4. It shall be for Member States to determine the use to be made of revenues generated from the auctioning of allowances. Those revenues should be used to tackle climate change in the EU and third countries, inter alia , to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, to adapt to the impacts of climate change in the EU and third countries, especially developing countries, to fund research and development for mitigation and adaptation, including in particular in the fields of aeronautics and air transport, to reduce emissions through low-emission transport and to cover the cost of administering the Community scheme. The proceeds of auctioning should also be used to fund contributions to the Global Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Fund, and measures to avoid deforestation. Member States shall inform the Commission of actions taken pursuant to this paragraph. 5. Information provided to the Commission pursuant to this Directive does not free Member States from the notification obligation laid down in Article 88(3) of the Treaty.
Amendment rationale: CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL Reasons for and objectives of the proposal Greenhouse gas emissions from aviation activities are increasing significantly. In the absence of further measures, carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) emissions from international aviation are estimated to almost quadruple by 2050 compared to 2010. Several studies demonstrate that technical and operational measures alone, including CO 2 standards for aircrafts or the deployment of sustainable biofuels, are insufficient to curb aviation emissions, thus the need to use market-based measures to address their growth. The strong growth in GHG emissions from the aviation sector risks undermining the EU's and global efforts to effectively tackle climate change. Back in 2008, the EU led the way in addressing GHG emissions from aviation by including flights between aerodromes within the European Economic Area (hereafter "intra-EEA flights") and flights between aerodromes in the European Economic Area (EEA) and aerodromes in third countries ("extra-EEA flights") in the EU Emissions Trading System. This was instrumental in getting agreement in International Civil Aviation Organisation for a process towards a global market based measure to address international aviation, which started in 2013. It also allowed for aviation to contribute to the EU climate objective of emission reduction of 20% by 2020 compared to 1990 levels. Pending agreement in ICAO, and to promote the development of a global measure to regulate international aviation emissions in ICAO, the EU temporarily reduced the scope of the EU ETS to intra-EEA flights until 2016, waiting for the outcome of ICAO to review its scope in relation to extra-EEA flights. In the absence of any amendments to the EU ETS Directive, the EU ETS will automatically revert back to its full-scope application from 2017. The European Council agreed in October 2014 the 2030 policy framework for climate and energy. A centrepiece of the 2030 framework is the binding target to reduce overall EU greenhouse gas emissions by at least 40% domestically below 1990 levels by 2030. To achieve this target cost-effectively, the sectors covered by the EU emissions trading system (EU ETS) will have to reduce their emissions by 43% compared to 2005, while non-ETS sectors will have to reduce their emissions by 30% compared to 2005. This allowed the EU to submit its contribution under the Paris Agreement, qualifying as an economy wide commitment, including aviation emissions. The EU is committed to duly contribute to the climate goal under the Paris Agreement of keeping global warming well below 2 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels and pursue efforts to limit temperature increase to 1.5 degrees Celsius, as well as the aspirational goal set by the International Civil Aviation Organisation that global net CO 2 emissions from international aviation should not exceed 2020 levels ('carbon neutral growth' or CNG 2020). In October 2016, ICAO agreed at its 39 th Assembly on a Resolution for a global market-based measure (GMBM) to address the growth in international aviation emissions globally from 2021 through an offsetting system, aimed at enabling the aspiration goal of stabilising international aviation emissions at 2020 levels. During the GMBM's first phase (2021-2026), participation in the GMBM is explicitly voluntary. All major aviation countries should apply the GMBM from the start of its second phase in 2027. The EU and its Member States expressed their intention to apply the GMBM during its voluntary phase. While the aspirational goal and the basic nature of the GMBM as offsetting are agreed, a number of important features of the GMBM, key for its effectiveness and environmental integrity from a climate perspective, still need to be developed and agreed in ICAO before the GMBM can be implemented in 2021. Any delays in agreeing on these elements risk delaying the operationalization of the GMBM. This would also risk delaying implementation by States in domestic legislation which is crucial since the concrete operationalization of the GMBM rests on such national and regional action. The existing legislation requires the Commission to assess the outcome of the 39 th ICAO Assembly and, in that light, to review the scope of the EU ETS for flights to and from the EEA. In the absence of amendment to the existing legislation, the initial scope of the ETS (ie including extra EEA flights) would apply again. In view of the agreement on the GMBM at ICAO, the EU support towards its completion and timely operationalization, and the EU's intended implementation of the GMBM from 2021 onwards, it is deemed necessary to review the EU ETS legislation. To provide further momentum to international discussions on the remaining rules and governance necessary for the implementation of the GMBM it is proposed to continue the reduced scope application of the EU ETS (i.e. to flights between aerodromes located within the EEA, as set out in Regulation No 421/2014) beyond 2016. Once there is more clarity about the nature and content of the legal instruments adopted by ICAO for the implementation of the GMBM as well as about the intentions of our international partners regarding the implementation of the GMBM, a further assessment and review the EU ETS for the post-2020 period will be carried out. This will also take due account of the necessary consistency with the economy wide commitment taken by the EU under the Paris Agreement and its agreed objective of reducing GHG emissions domestically by 40 % by 2030 compared to 1990 levels. To provide legal certainty for compliance with the ETS in 2017, it is important that this proposal is agreed between the European Parliament and Council swiftly and ideally by the end of 2017.
Revised version (Article 3d Method of allocation of allowances for aviation through auctioning):
1. In the period referred to in Article 3c(1), 15 % of allowances shall be auctioned. 2. From 1 January 2013, 15 % of allowances shall be auctioned. The Commission shall undertake a study on the ability of the aviation sector to pass on the cost of CO 2 to its customers, in relation to the EU ETS and to the global market-based measure developed by the International Civil Aviation Organization (‘ICAO’). The study shall assess the ability of the aviation sector to pass on the cost of required emission units, comparing this to industries and to the power sector, with the intention of making a proposal to increase the percentage of auctioning pursuant to the review referred to in Article 28b(2), taking into account the analysis of costs passed on and considering alignment with other sectors and the competitiveness between different modes of transport. 3. A Regulation shall be adopted containing detailed provisions for the auctioning by Member States of allowances not required to be issued free of charge in accordance with paragraphs 1 and 2 of this Article or Article 3f(8). The number of allowances to be auctioned in each period by each Member State shall be proportionate to its share of the total attributed aviation emissions for all Member States for the reference year reported pursuant to Article 14(3) and verified pursuant to Article 15. For the period referred to in Article 3c(1), the reference year shall be 2010 and for each subsequent period referred to in Article 3c the reference year shall be the calendar year ending 24 months before the start of the period to which the auction relates. That Regulation, designed to amend non-essential elements of this Directive by supplementing it, shall be adopted in accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny referred to in Article 23(3). 4. All revenues generated from the auctioning of allowances should be used to tackle climate change in the Union and third countries, inter alia, to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, to adapt to the impacts of climate change in the Union and third countries, especially developing countries, to fund research and development for mitigation and adaptation, including in particular in the fields of aeronautics and air transport, to reduce emissions through low-emission transport and to cover the cost of administering the EU ETS. Auctioning revenues should also be used to fund common projects to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from the aviation sector, such as the Single European Sky ATM Research (SESAR) Joint Undertaking and the Clean Sky Joint Technology Initiatives and any initiatives enabling the widespread use of GNSS for satellite-based navigation and interoperable capabilities within all Member States, in particular projects that improve air navigation infrastructure, the provision of air navigation services and the use of airspace. The proceeds of auctioning may also be used to fund contributions to the Global Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Fund, and measures to avoid deforestation. Special consideration shall be given by Member States that use those revenues for co-financing research and innovation to programmes or initiatives under the Ninth Research Framework Programme (‘FP9’). Transparency on the use of revenues generated from the auctioning of allowances under this Directive is essential to meeting Union commitments. Member States shall inform the Commission of actions taken pursuant to the first subparagraph of this paragraph. 5. Information provided to the Commission pursuant to this Directive does not free Member States from the notification obligation laid down in Article 88(3) of the Treaty.
Article 3e Allocation and issue of allowances to aircraft operators
1. For each period referred to in Article 3c, each aircraft operator may apply for an allocation of allowances that are to be allocated free of charge. An application may be made by submitting to the competent authority in the administering Member State verified tonne-kilometre data for the aviation activities listed in Annex I performed by that aircraft operator for the monitoring year. For the purposes of this Article, the monitoring year shall be the calendar year ending 24 months before the start of the period to which it relates in accordance with Annexes IV and V or, in relation to the period referred to in Article 3c(1), 2010. Any application shall be made at least 21 months before the start of the period to which it relates or, in relation to the period referred to in Article 3c(1), by 31 March 2011. 2. At least 18 months before the start of the period to which the application relates or, in relation to the period referred to in Article 3c(1), by 30 June 2011, Member States shall submit applications received under paragraph 1 to the Commission. 3. At least 15 months before the start of each period referred to in Article 3c(2) or, in relation to the period referred to in Article 3c(1), by 30 September 2011, the Commission shall calculate and adopt a decision setting out: (a) the total quantity of allowances to be allocated for that period in accordance with Article 3c; (b) the number of allowances to be auctioned in that period in accordance with Article 3d; (c) the number of allowances in the special reserve for aircraft operators in that period in accordance with Article 3f(1); (d) the number of allowances to be allocated free of charge in that period by subtracting the number of allowances referred to in points (b) and (c) from the total quantity of allowances decided upon under point (a); and (e) the benchmark to be used to allocate allowances free of charge to aircraft operators whose applications were submitted to the Commission in accordance with paragraph 2. The benchmark referred to in point (e), expressed as allowances per tonne-kilometre, shall be calculated by dividing the number of allowances referred to in point (d) by the sum of the tonne-kilometre data included in applications submitted to the Commission in accordance with paragraph 2. 4. Within three months from the date on which the Commission adopts a decision under paragraph 3, each administering Member State shall calculate and publish: (a) the total allocation of allowances for the period to each aircraft operator whose application it submitted to the Commission in accordance with paragraph 2, calculated by multiplying the tonne-kilometre data included in the application by the benchmark referred to in paragraph 3(e); and (b) the allocation of allowances to each aircraft operator for each year, which shall be determined by dividing its total allocation of allowances for the period calculated under point (a) by the number of years in the period for which that aircraft operator is performing an aviation activity listed in Annex I. 5. By 28 February 2012 and by 28 February of each subsequent year, the competent authority of the administering Member State shall issue to each aircraft operator the number of allowances allocated to that aircraft operator for that year under this Article or Article 3f.
Amendment rationale: CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL Reasons for and objectives of the proposal The European Green Deal Communication 1 launched a new growth strategy for the EU that aims to transform the EU into a fair and prosperous society with a modern, resource-efficient and competitive economy. It reaffirms the Commission’s ambition to increase its climate targets and make Europe the first climate-neutral continent by 2050. Furthermore, it aims to protect the health and well-being of citizens from environment-related risks and impacts. The necessity and value of the European Green Deal have only grown in light of the very severe effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the health, living and working conditions and well-being of the Union’s citizens. Tackling climate change is an urgent challenge. In line with the scientific findings of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Special Report, global net-zero CO 2 emissions need to be achieved around 2050, and neutrality for all other greenhouse gases as soon as possible later in the century. This urgent challenge requires the EU to step up its action and demonstrate global leadership by becoming climate neutral by 2050. This objective is set out in the Communication ‘ A Clean Planet for all ’ - A European strategic long-term vision for a prosperous, modern, competitive and climate-neutral economy’ 2 . Based on the European Green Deal strategy and a comprehensive impact assessment, the Commission’s Communication of September 2020 on Stepping up Europe’s 2030 climate ambition 3 (‘2030 Climate Target Plan’) proposed to raise the EU's ambition and put forward a comprehensive plan to increase the European Union’s binding target for 2030 towards at least 55 % net emission reduction, in a responsible way. Raising the 2030 ambition now helps give certainty to policymakers and investors, so that decisions made in the coming years do not lock in emission levels inconsistent with the EU’s objective to be climate neutral by 2050. The 2030 target is in line with the Paris Agreement objective to keep the global temperature increase to well below 2°C and pursue efforts to keep it to 1.5°C. The European Council endorsed the new EU binding target for 2030 at its meeting of December 2020 4 . It also called on the Commission “ to assess how all economic sectors can best contribute to the 2030 target and to make the necessary proposals, accompanied by an in-depth examination of the environmental, economic and social impact at Member State level, taking into account national energy and climate plans and reviewing existing flexibilities ”. To this end, the European Climate Law 5 , as agreed with the co-legislators, makes the EU’s climate neutrality target legally binding, and raises the 2030 ambition by setting a target of at least 55 % net emission reductions by 2030 compared to 1990. In order to follow the pathway proposed in the European Climate Law, and deliver this increased level of ambition for 2030, the Commission has reviewed the climate and energy legislation currently in place that are expected to only reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 40 % by 2030 and by 60 % by 2050. This ‘ Fit for 55 ’ legislative package, as announced in the 2030 Climate Target Plan, is the most comprehensive building block in the efforts to implement the ambitious new 2030 climate target, and all economic sectors and policies will need to make their contribution. The European Council also invited the Commission in December 2020 to consider exploring ways to strengthen the EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS), while preserving its integrity and taking into account the need to address distributional concerns and energy poverty. The European Council also invited the Commission to consider proposing measures that enable energy-intensive industries to develop and deploy innovative climate-neutral technologies while maintaining their industrial competitiveness. The current ETS legislation was revised in 2018 to deliver a 43 % reduction in EU ETS emissions by 2030 compared to 2005, coherent with an EU economy-wide emissions reduction target of at least 40 % by 2030 compared to 1990. More recent analysis by the Commission services, however, indicates that, if the legislation remains unchanged, the sectors currently covered by the EU ETS would instead achieve emission reductions of -51 % in 2030 compared to 2005 6 . Even though this would mean outperforming the contribution of -43 % referred to above, it would still be an insufficient contribution to an overall target of at least -55 % compared to 1990. Therefore, the general objective of this initiative is to revise the ETS Directive in a manner commensurate with the 2030 climate ambition to reach at least 55 % net greenhouse gas emission reductions by 2030 below 1990 levels and with a gradual and balanced trajectory towards climate neutrality by 2050, in a cost-effective and coherent way while taking into account the need for a just transition and the need for all sectors to contribute to the EU’s climate efforts. As explained in the impact assessment, contribution of the sectors covered by the EU ETS of -61 % compared to 2005 is considered as best reflecting the 2030 Climate Target Plan results and is taken as the EU ETS ambition contributing to an overall target of at least -55 % compared to 1990. Increasing the EU ETS’s environmental contribution entails adjusting primarily the total number of allowances issued under the EU ETS (the ‘cap’). However, a reduced amount of allowances available to the market affects other pillars of the EU ETS and the carbon price. It impacts core principles such as the need for market stability, the protection against the risk of carbon leakage, the carefully balanced distributional effects between Member States, and the availability of funds for the increased investment needs in low-carbon technologies. At the same time as the EU ETS is brought in line with the overall target of at least -55 % compared to 1990, this increased climate ambition also needs to be reflected in the contribution to the EU’s climate efforts of sectors currently outside of the EU ETS. The impact assessment accompanying the 2030 Climate Target Plan found that in the absence of additional measures, emissions in certain sectors would not decrease as much as required to be on a path to achieve an economy-wide 55 % reduction in emissions. In fact, in maritime transport, emissions today are higher than in 1990, and maritime transport emissions are expected to grow further in a business-as-usual scenario . All pathways assessed as part of the 2030 Climate Target Plan and the Sustainable and Smart Mobility Strategy 7 envisage 80-82 % emissions reductions from international shipping by 2050 relative to 1990 (equivalent to 88-89 % emissions reductions relative to 2008) 8 , in order to be consistent with the increased level of climate ambition. Therefore, the European Commission undertook the commitment to extend the EU ETS to maritime transport as part of a basket of EU measures to address emissions from maritime transport , along with action agreed within the IMO. In this context, the Commission welcomes the progress that the European Parliament and the Council have made since 2019 on the proposal to amend Regulation (EU) 2015/757 9 in order to take appropriate account of the global data collection system for ship fuel oil consumption data ( COM(2019) 38 final) and the Commission takes note of the European Parliament’s Plenary support for the extension of the EU’s Emissions Trading System (EU ETS) to cover maritime transport emissions from 2023. Emissions from maritime transport should be included in the existing emissions trading system. To ensure a smooth transition, a phase-in period should be introduced where shipping companies would only have to surrender allowances for a portion of their verified emissions, gradually rising to 100 % over 4 years. As only around 90 million tons of CO 2 would be added through the extension to maritime transport to the existing ETS, the impact on the availability of allowances for other sectors covered would remain limited. To take into account the inclusion of the maritime sector in the EU ETS, Regulation (EU) 2015/757 should be amended, in particular as regards the reporting of aggregated emissions data at company level and considering the role of administering authorities in respect of shipping companies. These amendments complement those proposed in COM(2019) 38 final. As specified in the 2030 Climate Target Plan, the building sector is currently responsible directly and indirectly for 36 % of energy-related greenhouse gas emissions in the EU and has a large cost-effective potential to reduce emissions. More than half of those emissions are already covered by the existing ETS, notably the provision of electricity for use in buildings and most emissions of district heating. However, many homes are still heated with outdated systems that use polluting fossil fuels such as coal and oil. The sector of road transport also has a significant cost-effective reduction potential. Today, road transport accounts for a fifth of the EU’s greenhouse gas emissions and increased its emissions by over a quarter since 1990. As already considered in the European Green Deal Communication, the Commission is proposing to include the building sector and road transport into emissions trading. The coverage of these sectors by emissions trading, when put in the context of other appropriate regulatory and investment measures for the sectors in question, would provide for increased and more harmonised economic incentives to reduce emissions across these sectors in the EU and increased certainty of delivery of the emission reductions for those sectors. Emissions trading for the buildings and road transport sectors should be introduced through separate but adjacent emissions trading. This will avoid any disturbance of the well-functioning emissions trading system for stationary installations and aviation, given the different reduction potentials in those sectors and different factors that influence the demand. Any possible merger of the two systems should be assessed only after a few years of functioning of the new emissions trading, based on experience. The extension to buildings and road transport requires an upstream approach to regulated entities. Market stability is crucial for the EU ETS to function correctly to achieve its targets. To ensure market stability, Decision (EU) 2015/1814 10 established the market stability reserve (MSR). It began operating in January 2019. The objectives of the MSR are to tackle historical supply-demand imbalances and to make the EU ETS more resilient to major imbalances. The mechanism must preserve regulatory stability and ensure long-term predictability. Article 3 of the Decision requires the Commission to review the functioning of the reserve within three years of the start of the operation. This review needs to be considered together with the effects for market stability of increasing the ambition of the EU ETS, so the necessary amendments to the reserve are proposed together with the amendments to the EU ETS with this proposal. In this context, this proposal, as part of the Fit for 55 package, has the following specific objectives: – strengthening the EU ETS in its current scope in order to provide the appropriate contribution to an overall target of at least -55 % GHG emissions compared to 1990; – ensuring continued effective protection for the sectors exposed to a significant risk of carbon leakage while incentivising the uptake of low-carbon technologies; – addressing the distributional and social effects of this transition, by reviewing the use of auctioning revenues and the size and functioning of the low-carbon funding mechanisms; – ensuring that the other sectors than those currently included in the EU ETS contribute cost-effectively to the emission reductions needed in line with EU targets and Paris Agreement commitments notably by including emissions from maritime transport and emissions from buildings and road transport under the rules of the EU ETS while ensuring synergies with other policies targeting those sectors; – reviewing the monitoring, reporting and verification system of CO 2 emissions from maritime transport to take into account the inclusion of the maritime transport sector in the EU ETS; – reviewing the market stability reserve in line with the corresponding legal obligation and examining possible amendments to its design, to fulfil the legal objectives in the MSR decision and to address any issues that may be raised in the context of the increased ambition.
Article 3f Special reserve for certain aircraft operators
1. In each period referred to in Article 3c(2), 3 % of the total quantity of allowances to be allocated shall be set aside in a special reserve for aircraft operators: (a) who start performing an aviation activity falling within Annex I after the monitoring year for which tonne-kilometre data was submitted under Article 3e(1) in respect of a period referred to in Article 3c(2); or (b) whose tonne-kilometre data increases by an average of more than 18 % annually between the monitoring year for which tonne-kilometre data was submitted under Article 3e(1) in respect of a period referred to in Article 3c(2) and the second calendar year of that period; and whose activity under point (a), or additional activity under point (b), is not in whole or in part a continuation of an aviation activity previously performed by another aircraft operator. 2. An aircraft operator who is eligible under paragraph 1 may apply for a free allocation of allowances from the special reserve by making an application to the competent authority of its administering Member State. Any application shall be made by 30 June in the third year of the period referred to in Article 3c(2) to which it relates. An allocation to an aircraft operator under paragraph 1(b) shall not exceed 1 000 000 allowances. 3. An application under paragraph 2 shall: (a) include verified tonne-kilometre data in accordance with Annexes IV and V for the aviation activities listed in Annex I performed by the aircraft operator in the second calendar year of the period referred to in Article 3c(2) to which the application relates; (b) provide evidence that the criteria for eligibility under paragraph 1 are fulfilled; and (c) in the case of aircraft operators falling within paragraph 1(b), state: (i) the percentage increase in tonne-kilometres performed by that aircraft operator between the monitoring year for which tonne-kilometre data was submitted under Article 3e(1) in respect of a period referred to in Article 3c(2) and the second calendar year of that period; (ii) the absolute growth in tonne-kilometres performed by that aircraft operator between the monitoring year for which tonne-kilometre data was submitted under Article 3e(1) in respect of a period referred to in Article 3c(2) and the second calendar year of that period; and (iii) the absolute growth in tonne-kilometres performed by that aircraft operator between the monitoring year for which tonne-kilometre data was submitted under Article 3e(1) in respect of a period referred to in Article 3c(2) and the second calendar year of that period which exceeds the percentage specified in paragraph 1(b). (c) in the case of aircraft operators falling within paragraph 1(b), state: (i) the percentage increase in tonne-kilometres performed by that aircraft operator between the monitoring year for which tonne-kilometre data was submitted under Article 3e(1) in respect of a period referred to in Article 3c(2) and the second calendar year of that period; (ii) the absolute growth in tonne-kilometres performed by that aircraft operator between the monitoring year for which tonne-kilometre data was submitted under Article 3e(1) in respect of a period referred to in Article 3c(2) and the second calendar year of that period; and (iii) the absolute growth in tonne-kilometres performed by that aircraft operator between the monitoring year for which tonne-kilometre data was submitted under Article 3e(1) in respect of a period referred to in Article 3c(2) and the second calendar year of that period which exceeds the percentage specified in paragraph 1(b). 4. No later than six months from the deadline for making an application under paragraph 2, Member States shall submit applications received under that paragraph to the Commission. 5. No later than 12 months from the deadline for making an application under paragraph 2, the Commission shall decide on the benchmark to be used to allocate allowances free of charge to aircraft operators whose applications were submitted to the Commission in accordance with paragraph 4. Subject to paragraph 6, the benchmark shall be calculated by dividing the number of the allowances in the special reserve by the sum of: (a) the tonne-kilometre data for aircraft operators falling within paragraph 1(a) included in applications submitted to the Commission in accordance with paragraphs 3(a) and 4; and (b) the absolute growth in tonne-kilometres exceeding the percentage specified in paragraph 1(b) for aircraft operators falling within paragraph 1(b) included in applications submitted to the Commission in accordance with paragraphs 3(c)(iii) and 4. 6. The benchmark referred to in paragraph 5 shall not result in an annual allocation per tonne-kilometre greater than the annual allocation per tonne-kilometre to aircraft operators under Article 3e(4). 7. Within three months from the date on which the Commission adopts a decision under paragraph 5, each administering Member State shall calculate and publish: (a) the allocation of allowances from the special reserve to each aircraft operator whose application it submitted to the Commission in accordance with paragraph 4. This allocation shall be calculated by multiplying the benchmark referred to in paragraph 5 by: (i) in the case of an aircraft operator falling within paragraph 1(a), the tonne-kilometre data included in the application submitted to the Commission under paragraphs 3(a) and 4; (ii) in the case of an aircraft operator falling within paragraph 1(b), the absolute growth in tonne-kilometres exceeding the percentage specified in paragraph 1(b) included in the application submitted to the Commission under paragraphs 3(c)(iii) and 4; and (a) the allocation of allowances from the special reserve to each aircraft operator whose application it submitted to the Commission in accordance with paragraph 4. This allocation shall be calculated by multiplying the benchmark referred to in paragraph 5 by: (i) in the case of an aircraft operator falling within paragraph 1(a), the tonne-kilometre data included in the application submitted to the Commission under paragraphs 3(a) and 4; (ii) in the case of an aircraft operator falling within paragraph 1(b), the absolute growth in tonne-kilometres exceeding the percentage specified in paragraph 1(b) included in the application submitted to the Commission under paragraphs 3(c)(iii) and 4; and (b) the allocation of allowances to each aircraft operator for each year, which shall be determined by dividing its allocation of allowances under point (a) by the number of full calendar years remaining in the period referred to in Article 3c(2) to which the allocation relates. 8. Any unallocated allowances in the special reserve shall be auctioned by Member States. 9. The Commission may establish detailed rules on the operation of the special reserve under this Article, including the assessment of compliance with eligibility criteria under paragraph 1. Those measures, designed to amend non-essential elements of this Directive by supplementing it, shall be adopted in accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny referred to in Article 23(3).
Amendment rationale: CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL Emissions from aviation are one of the fastest growing sources of greenhouse gas emissions. As the technological potential for emissions reduction is limited in the aviation sector, market-based measures (MBMs) allow aviation to contribute to emission reductions by the airlines offsetting their strong emission growth through funding emission reductions in other sectors. The suitability of MBMs for international aviation has long been recognised. The 2001 ICAO Assembly endorsed the application of open emissions trading systems to international aviation. Following the ICAO's 2004 endorsement of regional MBMs, the EU led the way by including aviation in its Emission Trading System (EU ETS). Despite its positive environmental effects at low economic costs, the implementation of the EU ETS has had to face significant international opposition (e.g. allegations that regulating emissions from airlines based outside the EU would violate the sovereignty of third states). The European Court of Justice has, however, dismissed appeals by foreign airlines in this respect and confirmed the legality of the EU ETS[1]. At the same time, the integration of aviation into the EU ETS has been decisive in driving forward ICAO discussions. The intensive engagement of the EU in tackling climate change has been crucial in generating momentum in ICAO towards global action for addressing aviation emissions. Clearly, given the EU ETS would only ever cover a proportion of international aviation emissions, the overall strong global growth of these emissions will continue if no MBM is implemented on a global level, and emission reduction goals will remain aspirational. The 2013 38th ICAO Assembly has now decided on the development of a global MBM to be finalised at the next ICAO Assembly in 2016 and to be implemented by 2020. Progress was not made on a "framework" for national/ regional MBMs up to 2020, as in particular the Assembly resolution repeated the same language as from the 2007 and 2010 Assemblies and the European States confirmed their position on the 2007 and 2010 Assembly resolutions as concerns so-called 'mutual agreement'. In response to this progress on a global MBM and to promote further momentum, the Commission considers it appropriate to propose lowering the proportion of emissions to which the EU emissions trading system should apply up to 2020, as the further action already envisaged in Decision No. 377/2013/EU.
Revised version (Article 3f Special reserve for certain aircraft operators):
1. In each period referred to in Article 3c(2), 3 % of the total quantity of allowances to be allocated shall be set aside in a special reserve for aircraft operators: (a) who start performing an aviation activity falling within Annex I after the monitoring year for which tonne-kilometre data was submitted under Article 3e(1) in respect of a period referred to in Article 3c(2); or (b) whose tonne-kilometre data increases by an average of more than 18 % annually between the monitoring year for which tonne-kilometre data was submitted under Article 3e(1) in respect of a period referred to in Article 3c(2) and the second calendar year of that period; and whose activity under point (a), or additional activity under point (b), is not in whole or in part a continuation of an aviation activity previously performed by another aircraft operator. 2. An aircraft operator who is eligible under paragraph 1 may apply for a free allocation of allowances from the special reserve by making an application to the competent authority of its administering Member State. Any application shall be made by 30 June in the third year of the period referred to in Article 3c(2) to which it relates. An allocation to an aircraft operator under paragraph 1(b) shall not exceed 1 000 000 allowances. 3. An application under paragraph 2 shall: (a) include verified tonne-kilometre data in accordance with Annexes IV and V for the aviation activities listed in Annex I performed by the aircraft operator in the second calendar year of the period referred to in Article 3c(2) to which the application relates; (b) provide evidence that the criteria for eligibility under paragraph 1 are fulfilled; and (c) in the case of aircraft operators falling within paragraph 1(b), state: (i) the percentage increase in tonne-kilometres performed by that aircraft operator between the monitoring year for which tonne-kilometre data was submitted under Article 3e(1) in respect of a period referred to in Article 3c(2) and the second calendar year of that period; (ii) the absolute growth in tonne-kilometres performed by that aircraft operator between the monitoring year for which tonne-kilometre data was submitted under Article 3e(1) in respect of a period referred to in Article 3c(2) and the second calendar year of that period; and (iii) the absolute growth in tonne-kilometres performed by that aircraft operator between the monitoring year for which tonne-kilometre data was submitted under Article 3e(1) in respect of a period referred to in Article 3c(2) and the second calendar year of that period which exceeds the percentage specified in paragraph 1(b). 4. No later than six months from the deadline for making an application under paragraph 2, Member States shall submit applications received under that paragraph to the Commission. 5. No later than 12 months from the deadline for making an application under paragraph 2, the Commission shall decide on the benchmark to be used to allocate allowances free of charge to aircraft operators whose applications were submitted to the Commission in accordance with paragraph 4. Subject to paragraph 6, the benchmark shall be calculated by dividing the number of the allowances in the special reserve by the sum of: (a) the tonne-kilometre data for aircraft operators falling within paragraph 1(a) included in applications submitted to the Commission in accordance with paragraphs 3(a) and 4; and (b) the absolute growth in tonne-kilometres exceeding the percentage specified in paragraph 1(b) for aircraft operators falling within paragraph 1(b) included in applications submitted to the Commission in accordance with paragraphs 3(c)(iii) and 4. 6. The benchmark referred to in paragraph 5 shall not result in an annual allocation per tonne-kilometre greater than the annual allocation per tonne-kilometre to aircraft operators under Article 3e(4). 7. Within three months from the date on which the Commission adopts a decision under paragraph 5, each administering Member State shall calculate and publish: (a) the allocation of allowances from the special reserve to each aircraft operator whose application it submitted to the Commission in accordance with paragraph 4. This allocation shall be calculated by multiplying the benchmark referred to in paragraph 5 by: (i) in the case of an aircraft operator falling within paragraph 1(a), the tonne-kilometre data included in the application submitted to the Commission under paragraphs 3(a) and 4; (ii) in the case of an aircraft operator falling within paragraph 1(b), the absolute growth in tonne-kilometres exceeding the percentage specified in paragraph 1(b) included in the application submitted to the Commission under paragraphs 3(c)(iii) and 4; and (b) the allocation of allowances to each aircraft operator for each year, which shall be determined by dividing its allocation of allowances under point (a) by the number of full calendar years remaining in the period referred to in Article 3c(2) to which the allocation relates. 8. Any unallocated allowances in the special reserve shall be auctioned by Member States. 9. The Commission may establish detailed rules on the operation of the special reserve under this Article, including the assessment of compliance with eligibility criteria under paragraph 1. Those measures, designed to amend non-essential elements of this Directive by supplementing it, shall be adopted in accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny referred to in Article 23(3).
Article 3g Monitoring and reporting plans
The administering Member State shall ensure that each aircraft operator submits to the competent authority in that Member State a monitoring plan setting out measures to monitor and report emissions and tonne-kilometre data for the purpose of an application under Article 3e and that such plans are approved by the competent authority in accordance with the regulation referred to in Article 14 .
Amendment rationale: CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL Reasons for and objectives of the proposal The European Green Deal Communication 1 launched a new growth strategy for the EU that aims to transform the EU into a fair and prosperous society with a modern, resource-efficient and competitive economy. It reaffirms the Commission’s ambition to increase its climate targets and make Europe the first climate-neutral continent by 2050. Furthermore, it aims to protect the health and well-being of citizens from environment-related risks and impacts. The necessity and value of the European Green Deal have only grown in light of the very severe effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the health, living and working conditions and well-being of the Union’s citizens. Tackling climate change is an urgent challenge. In line with the scientific findings of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Special Report, global net-zero CO 2 emissions need to be achieved around 2050, and neutrality for all other greenhouse gases as soon as possible later in the century. This urgent challenge requires the EU to step up its action and demonstrate global leadership by becoming climate neutral by 2050. This objective is set out in the Communication ‘ A Clean Planet for all ’ - A European strategic long-term vision for a prosperous, modern, competitive and climate-neutral economy’ 2 . Based on the European Green Deal strategy and a comprehensive impact assessment, the Commission’s Communication of September 2020 on Stepping up Europe’s 2030 climate ambition 3 (‘2030 Climate Target Plan’) proposed to raise the EU's ambition and put forward a comprehensive plan to increase the European Union’s binding target for 2030 towards at least 55 % net emission reduction, in a responsible way. Raising the 2030 ambition now helps give certainty to policymakers and investors, so that decisions made in the coming years do not lock in emission levels inconsistent with the EU’s objective to be climate neutral by 2050. The 2030 target is in line with the Paris Agreement objective to keep the global temperature increase to well below 2°C and pursue efforts to keep it to 1.5°C. The European Council endorsed the new EU binding target for 2030 at its meeting of December 2020 4 . It also called on the Commission “ to assess how all economic sectors can best contribute to the 2030 target and to make the necessary proposals, accompanied by an in-depth examination of the environmental, economic and social impact at Member State level, taking into account national energy and climate plans and reviewing existing flexibilities ”. To this end, the European Climate Law 5 , as agreed with the co-legislators, makes the EU’s climate neutrality target legally binding, and raises the 2030 ambition by setting a target of at least 55 % net emission reductions by 2030 compared to 1990. In order to follow the pathway proposed in the European Climate Law, and deliver this increased level of ambition for 2030, the Commission has reviewed the climate and energy legislation currently in place that are expected to only reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 40 % by 2030 and by 60 % by 2050. This ‘ Fit for 55 ’ legislative package, as announced in the 2030 Climate Target Plan, is the most comprehensive building block in the efforts to implement the ambitious new 2030 climate target, and all economic sectors and policies will need to make their contribution. The European Council also invited the Commission in December 2020 to consider exploring ways to strengthen the EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS), while preserving its integrity and taking into account the need to address distributional concerns and energy poverty. The European Council also invited the Commission to consider proposing measures that enable energy-intensive industries to develop and deploy innovative climate-neutral technologies while maintaining their industrial competitiveness. The current ETS legislation was revised in 2018 to deliver a 43 % reduction in EU ETS emissions by 2030 compared to 2005, coherent with an EU economy-wide emissions reduction target of at least 40 % by 2030 compared to 1990. More recent analysis by the Commission services, however, indicates that, if the legislation remains unchanged, the sectors currently covered by the EU ETS would instead achieve emission reductions of -51 % in 2030 compared to 2005 6 . Even though this would mean outperforming the contribution of -43 % referred to above, it would still be an insufficient contribution to an overall target of at least -55 % compared to 1990. Therefore, the general objective of this initiative is to revise the ETS Directive in a manner commensurate with the 2030 climate ambition to reach at least 55 % net greenhouse gas emission reductions by 2030 below 1990 levels and with a gradual and balanced trajectory towards climate neutrality by 2050, in a cost-effective and coherent way while taking into account the need for a just transition and the need for all sectors to contribute to the EU’s climate efforts. As explained in the impact assessment, contribution of the sectors covered by the EU ETS of -61 % compared to 2005 is considered as best reflecting the 2030 Climate Target Plan results and is taken as the EU ETS ambition contributing to an overall target of at least -55 % compared to 1990. Increasing the EU ETS’s environmental contribution entails adjusting primarily the total number of allowances issued under the EU ETS (the ‘cap’). However, a reduced amount of allowances available to the market affects other pillars of the EU ETS and the carbon price. It impacts core principles such as the need for market stability, the protection against the risk of carbon leakage, the carefully balanced distributional effects between Member States, and the availability of funds for the increased investment needs in low-carbon technologies. At the same time as the EU ETS is brought in line with the overall target of at least -55 % compared to 1990, this increased climate ambition also needs to be reflected in the contribution to the EU’s climate efforts of sectors currently outside of the EU ETS. The impact assessment accompanying the 2030 Climate Target Plan found that in the absence of additional measures, emissions in certain sectors would not decrease as much as required to be on a path to achieve an economy-wide 55 % reduction in emissions. In fact, in maritime transport, emissions today are higher than in 1990, and maritime transport emissions are expected to grow further in a business-as-usual scenario . All pathways assessed as part of the 2030 Climate Target Plan and the Sustainable and Smart Mobility Strategy 7 envisage 80-82 % emissions reductions from international shipping by 2050 relative to 1990 (equivalent to 88-89 % emissions reductions relative to 2008) 8 , in order to be consistent with the increased level of climate ambition. Therefore, the European Commission undertook the commitment to extend the EU ETS to maritime transport as part of a basket of EU measures to address emissions from maritime transport , along with action agreed within the IMO. In this context, the Commission welcomes the progress that the European Parliament and the Council have made since 2019 on the proposal to amend Regulation (EU) 2015/757 9 in order to take appropriate account of the global data collection system for ship fuel oil consumption data ( COM(2019) 38 final) and the Commission takes note of the European Parliament’s Plenary support for the extension of the EU’s Emissions Trading System (EU ETS) to cover maritime transport emissions from 2023. Emissions from maritime transport should be included in the existing emissions trading system. To ensure a smooth transition, a phase-in period should be introduced where shipping companies would only have to surrender allowances for a portion of their verified emissions, gradually rising to 100 % over 4 years. As only around 90 million tons of CO 2 would be added through the extension to maritime transport to the existing ETS, the impact on the availability of allowances for other sectors covered would remain limited. To take into account the inclusion of the maritime sector in the EU ETS, Regulation (EU) 2015/757 should be amended, in particular as regards the reporting of aggregated emissions data at company level and considering the role of administering authorities in respect of shipping companies. These amendments complement those proposed in COM(2019) 38 final. As specified in the 2030 Climate Target Plan, the building sector is currently responsible directly and indirectly for 36 % of energy-related greenhouse gas emissions in the EU and has a large cost-effective potential to reduce emissions. More than half of those emissions are already covered by the existing ETS, notably the provision of electricity for use in buildings and most emissions of district heating. However, many homes are still heated with outdated systems that use polluting fossil fuels such as coal and oil. The sector of road transport also has a significant cost-effective reduction potential. Today, road transport accounts for a fifth of the EU’s greenhouse gas emissions and increased its emissions by over a quarter since 1990. As already considered in the European Green Deal Communication, the Commission is proposing to include the building sector and road transport into emissions trading. The coverage of these sectors by emissions trading, when put in the context of other appropriate regulatory and investment measures for the sectors in question, would provide for increased and more harmonised economic incentives to reduce emissions across these sectors in the EU and increased certainty of delivery of the emission reductions for those sectors. Emissions trading for the buildings and road transport sectors should be introduced through separate but adjacent emissions trading. This will avoid any disturbance of the well-functioning emissions trading system for stationary installations and aviation, given the different reduction potentials in those sectors and different factors that influence the demand. Any possible merger of the two systems should be assessed only after a few years of functioning of the new emissions trading, based on experience. The extension to buildings and road transport requires an upstream approach to regulated entities. Market stability is crucial for the EU ETS to function correctly to achieve its targets. To ensure market stability, Decision (EU) 2015/1814 10 established the market stability reserve (MSR). It began operating in January 2019. The objectives of the MSR are to tackle historical supply-demand imbalances and to make the EU ETS more resilient to major imbalances. The mechanism must preserve regulatory stability and ensure long-term predictability. Article 3 of the Decision requires the Commission to review the functioning of the reserve within three years of the start of the operation. This review needs to be considered together with the effects for market stability of increasing the ambition of the EU ETS, so the necessary amendments to the reserve are proposed together with the amendments to the EU ETS with this proposal. In this context, this proposal, as part of the Fit for 55 package, has the following specific objectives: – strengthening the EU ETS in its current scope in order to provide the appropriate contribution to an overall target of at least -55 % GHG emissions compared to 1990; – ensuring continued effective protection for the sectors exposed to a significant risk of carbon leakage while incentivising the uptake of low-carbon technologies; – addressing the distributional and social effects of this transition, by reviewing the use of auctioning revenues and the size and functioning of the low-carbon funding mechanisms; – ensuring that the other sectors than those currently included in the EU ETS contribute cost-effectively to the emission reductions needed in line with EU targets and Paris Agreement commitments notably by including emissions from maritime transport and emissions from buildings and road transport under the rules of the EU ETS while ensuring synergies with other policies targeting those sectors; – reviewing the monitoring, reporting and verification system of CO 2 emissions from maritime transport to take into account the inclusion of the maritime transport sector in the EU ETS; – reviewing the market stability reserve in line with the corresponding legal obligation and examining possible amendments to its design, to fulfil the legal objectives in the MSR decision and to address any issues that may be raised in the context of the increased ambition.
Revised version (Article 3g Monitoring and reporting plans):
The administering Member State shall ensure that each aircraft operator submits to the competent authority in that Member State a monitoring plan setting out measures to monitor and report emissions and that such plans are approved by the competent authority in accordance with the implementing acts referred to in Article 14.
Article 3h Scope
The provisions of this Chapter shall apply to greenhouse gas emissions permits and the allocation and issue of allowances in respect of activities listed in Annex I other than aviation activities.
Amendment rationale: CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL Reasons for and objectives of the proposal The European Green Deal Communication 1 launched a new growth strategy for the EU that aims to transform the EU into a fair and prosperous society with a modern, resource-efficient and competitive economy. It reaffirms the Commission’s ambition to increase its climate targets and make Europe the first climate-neutral continent by 2050. Furthermore, it aims to protect the health and well-being of citizens from environment-related risks and impacts. The necessity and value of the European Green Deal have only grown in light of the very severe effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the health, living and working conditions and well-being of the Union’s citizens. Tackling climate change is an urgent challenge. In line with the scientific findings of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Special Report, global net-zero CO 2 emissions need to be achieved around 2050, and neutrality for all other greenhouse gases as soon as possible later in the century. This urgent challenge requires the EU to step up its action and demonstrate global leadership by becoming climate neutral by 2050. This objective is set out in the Communication ‘ A Clean Planet for all ’ - A European strategic long-term vision for a prosperous, modern, competitive and climate-neutral economy’ 2 . Based on the European Green Deal strategy and a comprehensive impact assessment, the Commission’s Communication of September 2020 on Stepping up Europe’s 2030 climate ambition 3 (‘2030 Climate Target Plan’) proposed to raise the EU's ambition and put forward a comprehensive plan to increase the European Union’s binding target for 2030 towards at least 55 % net emission reduction, in a responsible way. Raising the 2030 ambition now helps give certainty to policymakers and investors, so that decisions made in the coming years do not lock in emission levels inconsistent with the EU’s objective to be climate neutral by 2050. The 2030 target is in line with the Paris Agreement objective to keep the global temperature increase to well below 2°C and pursue efforts to keep it to 1.5°C. The European Council endorsed the new EU binding target for 2030 at its meeting of December 2020 4 . It also called on the Commission “ to assess how all economic sectors can best contribute to the 2030 target and to make the necessary proposals, accompanied by an in-depth examination of the environmental, economic and social impact at Member State level, taking into account national energy and climate plans and reviewing existing flexibilities ”. To this end, the European Climate Law 5 , as agreed with the co-legislators, makes the EU’s climate neutrality target legally binding, and raises the 2030 ambition by setting a target of at least 55 % net emission reductions by 2030 compared to 1990. In order to follow the pathway proposed in the European Climate Law, and deliver this increased level of ambition for 2030, the Commission has reviewed the climate and energy legislation currently in place that are expected to only reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 40 % by 2030 and by 60 % by 2050. This ‘ Fit for 55 ’ legislative package, as announced in the 2030 Climate Target Plan, is the most comprehensive building block in the efforts to implement the ambitious new 2030 climate target, and all economic sectors and policies will need to make their contribution. The European Council also invited the Commission in December 2020 to consider exploring ways to strengthen the EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS), while preserving its integrity and taking into account the need to address distributional concerns and energy poverty. The European Council also invited the Commission to consider proposing measures that enable energy-intensive industries to develop and deploy innovative climate-neutral technologies while maintaining their industrial competitiveness. The current ETS legislation was revised in 2018 to deliver a 43 % reduction in EU ETS emissions by 2030 compared to 2005, coherent with an EU economy-wide emissions reduction target of at least 40 % by 2030 compared to 1990. More recent analysis by the Commission services, however, indicates that, if the legislation remains unchanged, the sectors currently covered by the EU ETS would instead achieve emission reductions of -51 % in 2030 compared to 2005 6 . Even though this would mean outperforming the contribution of -43 % referred to above, it would still be an insufficient contribution to an overall target of at least -55 % compared to 1990. Therefore, the general objective of this initiative is to revise the ETS Directive in a manner commensurate with the 2030 climate ambition to reach at least 55 % net greenhouse gas emission reductions by 2030 below 1990 levels and with a gradual and balanced trajectory towards climate neutrality by 2050, in a cost-effective and coherent way while taking into account the need for a just transition and the need for all sectors to contribute to the EU’s climate efforts. As explained in the impact assessment, contribution of the sectors covered by the EU ETS of -61 % compared to 2005 is considered as best reflecting the 2030 Climate Target Plan results and is taken as the EU ETS ambition contributing to an overall target of at least -55 % compared to 1990. Increasing the EU ETS’s environmental contribution entails adjusting primarily the total number of allowances issued under the EU ETS (the ‘cap’). However, a reduced amount of allowances available to the market affects other pillars of the EU ETS and the carbon price. It impacts core principles such as the need for market stability, the protection against the risk of carbon leakage, the carefully balanced distributional effects between Member States, and the availability of funds for the increased investment needs in low-carbon technologies. At the same time as the EU ETS is brought in line with the overall target of at least -55 % compared to 1990, this increased climate ambition also needs to be reflected in the contribution to the EU’s climate efforts of sectors currently outside of the EU ETS. The impact assessment accompanying the 2030 Climate Target Plan found that in the absence of additional measures, emissions in certain sectors would not decrease as much as required to be on a path to achieve an economy-wide 55 % reduction in emissions. In fact, in maritime transport, emissions today are higher than in 1990, and maritime transport emissions are expected to grow further in a business-as-usual scenario . All pathways assessed as part of the 2030 Climate Target Plan and the Sustainable and Smart Mobility Strategy 7 envisage 80-82 % emissions reductions from international shipping by 2050 relative to 1990 (equivalent to 88-89 % emissions reductions relative to 2008) 8 , in order to be consistent with the increased level of climate ambition. Therefore, the European Commission undertook the commitment to extend the EU ETS to maritime transport as part of a basket of EU measures to address emissions from maritime transport , along with action agreed within the IMO. In this context, the Commission welcomes the progress that the European Parliament and the Council have made since 2019 on the proposal to amend Regulation (EU) 2015/757 9 in order to take appropriate account of the global data collection system for ship fuel oil consumption data ( COM(2019) 38 final) and the Commission takes note of the European Parliament’s Plenary support for the extension of the EU’s Emissions Trading System (EU ETS) to cover maritime transport emissions from 2023. Emissions from maritime transport should be included in the existing emissions trading system. To ensure a smooth transition, a phase-in period should be introduced where shipping companies would only have to surrender allowances for a portion of their verified emissions, gradually rising to 100 % over 4 years. As only around 90 million tons of CO 2 would be added through the extension to maritime transport to the existing ETS, the impact on the availability of allowances for other sectors covered would remain limited. To take into account the inclusion of the maritime sector in the EU ETS, Regulation (EU) 2015/757 should be amended, in particular as regards the reporting of aggregated emissions data at company level and considering the role of administering authorities in respect of shipping companies. These amendments complement those proposed in COM(2019) 38 final. As specified in the 2030 Climate Target Plan, the building sector is currently responsible directly and indirectly for 36 % of energy-related greenhouse gas emissions in the EU and has a large cost-effective potential to reduce emissions. More than half of those emissions are already covered by the existing ETS, notably the provision of electricity for use in buildings and most emissions of district heating. However, many homes are still heated with outdated systems that use polluting fossil fuels such as coal and oil. The sector of road transport also has a significant cost-effective reduction potential. Today, road transport accounts for a fifth of the EU’s greenhouse gas emissions and increased its emissions by over a quarter since 1990. As already considered in the European Green Deal Communication, the Commission is proposing to include the building sector and road transport into emissions trading. The coverage of these sectors by emissions trading, when put in the context of other appropriate regulatory and investment measures for the sectors in question, would provide for increased and more harmonised economic incentives to reduce emissions across these sectors in the EU and increased certainty of delivery of the emission reductions for those sectors. Emissions trading for the buildings and road transport sectors should be introduced through separate but adjacent emissions trading. This will avoid any disturbance of the well-functioning emissions trading system for stationary installations and aviation, given the different reduction potentials in those sectors and different factors that influence the demand. Any possible merger of the two systems should be assessed only after a few years of functioning of the new emissions trading, based on experience. The extension to buildings and road transport requires an upstream approach to regulated entities. Market stability is crucial for the EU ETS to function correctly to achieve its targets. To ensure market stability, Decision (EU) 2015/1814 10 established the market stability reserve (MSR). It began operating in January 2019. The objectives of the MSR are to tackle historical supply-demand imbalances and to make the EU ETS more resilient to major imbalances. The mechanism must preserve regulatory stability and ensure long-term predictability. Article 3 of the Decision requires the Commission to review the functioning of the reserve within three years of the start of the operation. This review needs to be considered together with the effects for market stability of increasing the ambition of the EU ETS, so the necessary amendments to the reserve are proposed together with the amendments to the EU ETS with this proposal. In this context, this proposal, as part of the Fit for 55 package, has the following specific objectives: – strengthening the EU ETS in its current scope in order to provide the appropriate contribution to an overall target of at least -55 % GHG emissions compared to 1990; – ensuring continued effective protection for the sectors exposed to a significant risk of carbon leakage while incentivising the uptake of low-carbon technologies; – addressing the distributional and social effects of this transition, by reviewing the use of auctioning revenues and the size and functioning of the low-carbon funding mechanisms; – ensuring that the other sectors than those currently included in the EU ETS contribute cost-effectively to the emission reductions needed in line with EU targets and Paris Agreement commitments notably by including emissions from maritime transport and emissions from buildings and road transport under the rules of the EU ETS while ensuring synergies with other policies targeting those sectors; – reviewing the monitoring, reporting and verification system of CO 2 emissions from maritime transport to take into account the inclusion of the maritime transport sector in the EU ETS; – reviewing the market stability reserve in line with the corresponding legal obligation and examining possible amendments to its design, to fulfil the legal objectives in the MSR decision and to address any issues that may be raised in the context of the increased ambition.
Revised version (Article 3h Scope):
The provisions of this Chapter shall apply to greenhouse gas emissions permits and the allocation and issue of allowances in respect of activities listed in Annex I other than aviation activities and maritime transport activities.
Article 4 Greenhouse gas emissions permits
Member States shall ensure that, from 1 January 2005, no installation carries out any activity listed in Annex I resulting in emissions specified in relation to that activity unless its operator holds a permit issued by a competent authority in accordance with Articles 5 and 6, or the installation is excluded from the Community scheme pursuant to Article 27. This shall also apply to installations opted in under Article 24.
Amendment rationale: CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL Reasons for and objectives of the proposal The European Green Deal Communication 1 launched a new growth strategy for the EU that aims to transform the EU into a fair and prosperous society with a modern, resource-efficient and competitive economy. It reaffirms the Commission’s ambition to increase its climate targets and make Europe the first climate-neutral continent by 2050. Furthermore, it aims to protect the health and well-being of citizens from environment-related risks and impacts. The necessity and value of the European Green Deal have only grown in light of the very severe effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the health, living and working conditions and well-being of the Union’s citizens. Tackling climate change is an urgent challenge. In line with the scientific findings of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Special Report, global net-zero CO 2 emissions need to be achieved around 2050, and neutrality for all other greenhouse gases as soon as possible later in the century. This urgent challenge requires the EU to step up its action and demonstrate global leadership by becoming climate neutral by 2050. This objective is set out in the Communication ‘ A Clean Planet for all ’ - A European strategic long-term vision for a prosperous, modern, competitive and climate-neutral economy’ 2 . Based on the European Green Deal strategy and a comprehensive impact assessment, the Commission’s Communication of September 2020 on Stepping up Europe’s 2030 climate ambition 3 (‘2030 Climate Target Plan’) proposed to raise the EU's ambition and put forward a comprehensive plan to increase the European Union’s binding target for 2030 towards at least 55 % net emission reduction, in a responsible way. Raising the 2030 ambition now helps give certainty to policymakers and investors, so that decisions made in the coming years do not lock in emission levels inconsistent with the EU’s objective to be climate neutral by 2050. The 2030 target is in line with the Paris Agreement objective to keep the global temperature increase to well below 2°C and pursue efforts to keep it to 1.5°C. The European Council endorsed the new EU binding target for 2030 at its meeting of December 2020 4 . It also called on the Commission “ to assess how all economic sectors can best contribute to the 2030 target and to make the necessary proposals, accompanied by an in-depth examination of the environmental, economic and social impact at Member State level, taking into account national energy and climate plans and reviewing existing flexibilities ”. To this end, the European Climate Law 5 , as agreed with the co-legislators, makes the EU’s climate neutrality target legally binding, and raises the 2030 ambition by setting a target of at least 55 % net emission reductions by 2030 compared to 1990. In order to follow the pathway proposed in the European Climate Law, and deliver this increased level of ambition for 2030, the Commission has reviewed the climate and energy legislation currently in place that are expected to only reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 40 % by 2030 and by 60 % by 2050. This ‘ Fit for 55 ’ legislative package, as announced in the 2030 Climate Target Plan, is the most comprehensive building block in the efforts to implement the ambitious new 2030 climate target, and all economic sectors and policies will need to make their contribution. The European Council also invited the Commission in December 2020 to consider exploring ways to strengthen the EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS), while preserving its integrity and taking into account the need to address distributional concerns and energy poverty. The European Council also invited the Commission to consider proposing measures that enable energy-intensive industries to develop and deploy innovative climate-neutral technologies while maintaining their industrial competitiveness. The current ETS legislation was revised in 2018 to deliver a 43 % reduction in EU ETS emissions by 2030 compared to 2005, coherent with an EU economy-wide emissions reduction target of at least 40 % by 2030 compared to 1990. More recent analysis by the Commission services, however, indicates that, if the legislation remains unchanged, the sectors currently covered by the EU ETS would instead achieve emission reductions of -51 % in 2030 compared to 2005 6 . Even though this would mean outperforming the contribution of -43 % referred to above, it would still be an insufficient contribution to an overall target of at least -55 % compared to 1990. Therefore, the general objective of this initiative is to revise the ETS Directive in a manner commensurate with the 2030 climate ambition to reach at least 55 % net greenhouse gas emission reductions by 2030 below 1990 levels and with a gradual and balanced trajectory towards climate neutrality by 2050, in a cost-effective and coherent way while taking into account the need for a just transition and the need for all sectors to contribute to the EU’s climate efforts. As explained in the impact assessment, contribution of the sectors covered by the EU ETS of -61 % compared to 2005 is considered as best reflecting the 2030 Climate Target Plan results and is taken as the EU ETS ambition contributing to an overall target of at least -55 % compared to 1990. Increasing the EU ETS’s environmental contribution entails adjusting primarily the total number of allowances issued under the EU ETS (the ‘cap’). However, a reduced amount of allowances available to the market affects other pillars of the EU ETS and the carbon price. It impacts core principles such as the need for market stability, the protection against the risk of carbon leakage, the carefully balanced distributional effects between Member States, and the availability of funds for the increased investment needs in low-carbon technologies. At the same time as the EU ETS is brought in line with the overall target of at least -55 % compared to 1990, this increased climate ambition also needs to be reflected in the contribution to the EU’s climate efforts of sectors currently outside of the EU ETS. The impact assessment accompanying the 2030 Climate Target Plan found that in the absence of additional measures, emissions in certain sectors would not decrease as much as required to be on a path to achieve an economy-wide 55 % reduction in emissions. In fact, in maritime transport, emissions today are higher than in 1990, and maritime transport emissions are expected to grow further in a business-as-usual scenario . All pathways assessed as part of the 2030 Climate Target Plan and the Sustainable and Smart Mobility Strategy 7 envisage 80-82 % emissions reductions from international shipping by 2050 relative to 1990 (equivalent to 88-89 % emissions reductions relative to 2008) 8 , in order to be consistent with the increased level of climate ambition. Therefore, the European Commission undertook the commitment to extend the EU ETS to maritime transport as part of a basket of EU measures to address emissions from maritime transport , along with action agreed within the IMO. In this context, the Commission welcomes the progress that the European Parliament and the Council have made since 2019 on the proposal to amend Regulation (EU) 2015/757 9 in order to take appropriate account of the global data collection system for ship fuel oil consumption data ( COM(2019) 38 final) and the Commission takes note of the European Parliament’s Plenary support for the extension of the EU’s Emissions Trading System (EU ETS) to cover maritime transport emissions from 2023. Emissions from maritime transport should be included in the existing emissions trading system. To ensure a smooth transition, a phase-in period should be introduced where shipping companies would only have to surrender allowances for a portion of their verified emissions, gradually rising to 100 % over 4 years. As only around 90 million tons of CO 2 would be added through the extension to maritime transport to the existing ETS, the impact on the availability of allowances for other sectors covered would remain limited. To take into account the inclusion of the maritime sector in the EU ETS, Regulation (EU) 2015/757 should be amended, in particular as regards the reporting of aggregated emissions data at company level and considering the role of administering authorities in respect of shipping companies. These amendments complement those proposed in COM(2019) 38 final. As specified in the 2030 Climate Target Plan, the building sector is currently responsible directly and indirectly for 36 % of energy-related greenhouse gas emissions in the EU and has a large cost-effective potential to reduce emissions. More than half of those emissions are already covered by the existing ETS, notably the provision of electricity for use in buildings and most emissions of district heating. However, many homes are still heated with outdated systems that use polluting fossil fuels such as coal and oil. The sector of road transport also has a significant cost-effective reduction potential. Today, road transport accounts for a fifth of the EU’s greenhouse gas emissions and increased its emissions by over a quarter since 1990. As already considered in the European Green Deal Communication, the Commission is proposing to include the building sector and road transport into emissions trading. The coverage of these sectors by emissions trading, when put in the context of other appropriate regulatory and investment measures for the sectors in question, would provide for increased and more harmonised economic incentives to reduce emissions across these sectors in the EU and increased certainty of delivery of the emission reductions for those sectors. Emissions trading for the buildings and road transport sectors should be introduced through separate but adjacent emissions trading. This will avoid any disturbance of the well-functioning emissions trading system for stationary installations and aviation, given the different reduction potentials in those sectors and different factors that influence the demand. Any possible merger of the two systems should be assessed only after a few years of functioning of the new emissions trading, based on experience. The extension to buildings and road transport requires an upstream approach to regulated entities. Market stability is crucial for the EU ETS to function correctly to achieve its targets. To ensure market stability, Decision (EU) 2015/1814 10 established the market stability reserve (MSR). It began operating in January 2019. The objectives of the MSR are to tackle historical supply-demand imbalances and to make the EU ETS more resilient to major imbalances. The mechanism must preserve regulatory stability and ensure long-term predictability. Article 3 of the Decision requires the Commission to review the functioning of the reserve within three years of the start of the operation. This review needs to be considered together with the effects for market stability of increasing the ambition of the EU ETS, so the necessary amendments to the reserve are proposed together with the amendments to the EU ETS with this proposal. In this context, this proposal, as part of the Fit for 55 package, has the following specific objectives: – strengthening the EU ETS in its current scope in order to provide the appropriate contribution to an overall target of at least -55 % GHG emissions compared to 1990; – ensuring continued effective protection for the sectors exposed to a significant risk of carbon leakage while incentivising the uptake of low-carbon technologies; – addressing the distributional and social effects of this transition, by reviewing the use of auctioning revenues and the size and functioning of the low-carbon funding mechanisms; – ensuring that the other sectors than those currently included in the EU ETS contribute cost-effectively to the emission reductions needed in line with EU targets and Paris Agreement commitments notably by including emissions from maritime transport and emissions from buildings and road transport under the rules of the EU ETS while ensuring synergies with other policies targeting those sectors; – reviewing the monitoring, reporting and verification system of CO 2 emissions from maritime transport to take into account the inclusion of the maritime transport sector in the EU ETS; – reviewing the market stability reserve in line with the corresponding legal obligation and examining possible amendments to its design, to fulfil the legal objectives in the MSR decision and to address any issues that may be raised in the context of the increased ambition.
Revised version (Article 4 Greenhouse gas emissions permits):
Member States shall ensure that, from 1 January 2005, no installation carries out any activity listed in Annex I resulting in emissions specified in relation to that activity unless its operator holds a permit issued by a competent authority in accordance with Articles 5 and 6, or the installation is excluded from the EU ETS pursuant to Article 27. This shall also apply to installations opted in under Article 24.
Article 5 Applications for greenhouse gas emissions permits
An application to the competent authority for a greenhouse gas emissions permit shall include a description of: (a) the installation and its activities including the technology used; (b) the raw and auxiliary materials, the use of which is likely to lead to emissions of gases listed in Annex I; (c) the sources of emissions of gases listed in Annex I from the installation; and (d) the measures planned to monitor and report emissions in accordance with the regulation referred to in Article 14. The application shall also include a non-technical summary of the details referred to in the first subparagraph.
Amendment rationale: CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL Reasons for and objectives of the proposal The European Green Deal Communication 1 launched a new growth strategy for the EU that aims to transform the EU into a fair and prosperous society with a modern, resource-efficient and competitive economy. It reaffirms the Commission’s ambition to increase its climate targets and make Europe the first climate-neutral continent by 2050. Furthermore, it aims to protect the health and well-being of citizens from environment-related risks and impacts. The necessity and value of the European Green Deal have only grown in light of the very severe effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the health, living and working conditions and well-being of the Union’s citizens. Tackling climate change is an urgent challenge. In line with the scientific findings of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Special Report, global net-zero CO 2 emissions need to be achieved around 2050, and neutrality for all other greenhouse gases as soon as possible later in the century. This urgent challenge requires the EU to step up its action and demonstrate global leadership by becoming climate neutral by 2050. This objective is set out in the Communication ‘ A Clean Planet for all ’ - A European strategic long-term vision for a prosperous, modern, competitive and climate-neutral economy’ 2 . Based on the European Green Deal strategy and a comprehensive impact assessment, the Commission’s Communication of September 2020 on Stepping up Europe’s 2030 climate ambition 3 (‘2030 Climate Target Plan’) proposed to raise the EU's ambition and put forward a comprehensive plan to increase the European Union’s binding target for 2030 towards at least 55 % net emission reduction, in a responsible way. Raising the 2030 ambition now helps give certainty to policymakers and investors, so that decisions made in the coming years do not lock in emission levels inconsistent with the EU’s objective to be climate neutral by 2050. The 2030 target is in line with the Paris Agreement objective to keep the global temperature increase to well below 2°C and pursue efforts to keep it to 1.5°C. The European Council endorsed the new EU binding target for 2030 at its meeting of December 2020 4 . It also called on the Commission “ to assess how all economic sectors can best contribute to the 2030 target and to make the necessary proposals, accompanied by an in-depth examination of the environmental, economic and social impact at Member State level, taking into account national energy and climate plans and reviewing existing flexibilities ”. To this end, the European Climate Law 5 , as agreed with the co-legislators, makes the EU’s climate neutrality target legally binding, and raises the 2030 ambition by setting a target of at least 55 % net emission reductions by 2030 compared to 1990. In order to follow the pathway proposed in the European Climate Law, and deliver this increased level of ambition for 2030, the Commission has reviewed the climate and energy legislation currently in place that are expected to only reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 40 % by 2030 and by 60 % by 2050. This ‘ Fit for 55 ’ legislative package, as announced in the 2030 Climate Target Plan, is the most comprehensive building block in the efforts to implement the ambitious new 2030 climate target, and all economic sectors and policies will need to make their contribution. The European Council also invited the Commission in December 2020 to consider exploring ways to strengthen the EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS), while preserving its integrity and taking into account the need to address distributional concerns and energy poverty. The European Council also invited the Commission to consider proposing measures that enable energy-intensive industries to develop and deploy innovative climate-neutral technologies while maintaining their industrial competitiveness. The current ETS legislation was revised in 2018 to deliver a 43 % reduction in EU ETS emissions by 2030 compared to 2005, coherent with an EU economy-wide emissions reduction target of at least 40 % by 2030 compared to 1990. More recent analysis by the Commission services, however, indicates that, if the legislation remains unchanged, the sectors currently covered by the EU ETS would instead achieve emission reductions of -51 % in 2030 compared to 2005 6 . Even though this would mean outperforming the contribution of -43 % referred to above, it would still be an insufficient contribution to an overall target of at least -55 % compared to 1990. Therefore, the general objective of this initiative is to revise the ETS Directive in a manner commensurate with the 2030 climate ambition to reach at least 55 % net greenhouse gas emission reductions by 2030 below 1990 levels and with a gradual and balanced trajectory towards climate neutrality by 2050, in a cost-effective and coherent way while taking into account the need for a just transition and the need for all sectors to contribute to the EU’s climate efforts. As explained in the impact assessment, contribution of the sectors covered by the EU ETS of -61 % compared to 2005 is considered as best reflecting the 2030 Climate Target Plan results and is taken as the EU ETS ambition contributing to an overall target of at least -55 % compared to 1990. Increasing the EU ETS’s environmental contribution entails adjusting primarily the total number of allowances issued under the EU ETS (the ‘cap’). However, a reduced amount of allowances available to the market affects other pillars of the EU ETS and the carbon price. It impacts core principles such as the need for market stability, the protection against the risk of carbon leakage, the carefully balanced distributional effects between Member States, and the availability of funds for the increased investment needs in low-carbon technologies. At the same time as the EU ETS is brought in line with the overall target of at least -55 % compared to 1990, this increased climate ambition also needs to be reflected in the contribution to the EU’s climate efforts of sectors currently outside of the EU ETS. The impact assessment accompanying the 2030 Climate Target Plan found that in the absence of additional measures, emissions in certain sectors would not decrease as much as required to be on a path to achieve an economy-wide 55 % reduction in emissions. In fact, in maritime transport, emissions today are higher than in 1990, and maritime transport emissions are expected to grow further in a business-as-usual scenario . All pathways assessed as part of the 2030 Climate Target Plan and the Sustainable and Smart Mobility Strategy 7 envisage 80-82 % emissions reductions from international shipping by 2050 relative to 1990 (equivalent to 88-89 % emissions reductions relative to 2008) 8 , in order to be consistent with the increased level of climate ambition. Therefore, the European Commission undertook the commitment to extend the EU ETS to maritime transport as part of a basket of EU measures to address emissions from maritime transport , along with action agreed within the IMO. In this context, the Commission welcomes the progress that the European Parliament and the Council have made since 2019 on the proposal to amend Regulation (EU) 2015/757 9 in order to take appropriate account of the global data collection system for ship fuel oil consumption data ( COM(2019) 38 final) and the Commission takes note of the European Parliament’s Plenary support for the extension of the EU’s Emissions Trading System (EU ETS) to cover maritime transport emissions from 2023. Emissions from maritime transport should be included in the existing emissions trading system. To ensure a smooth transition, a phase-in period should be introduced where shipping companies would only have to surrender allowances for a portion of their verified emissions, gradually rising to 100 % over 4 years. As only around 90 million tons of CO 2 would be added through the extension to maritime transport to the existing ETS, the impact on the availability of allowances for other sectors covered would remain limited. To take into account the inclusion of the maritime sector in the EU ETS, Regulation (EU) 2015/757 should be amended, in particular as regards the reporting of aggregated emissions data at company level and considering the role of administering authorities in respect of shipping companies. These amendments complement those proposed in COM(2019) 38 final. As specified in the 2030 Climate Target Plan, the building sector is currently responsible directly and indirectly for 36 % of energy-related greenhouse gas emissions in the EU and has a large cost-effective potential to reduce emissions. More than half of those emissions are already covered by the existing ETS, notably the provision of electricity for use in buildings and most emissions of district heating. However, many homes are still heated with outdated systems that use polluting fossil fuels such as coal and oil. The sector of road transport also has a significant cost-effective reduction potential. Today, road transport accounts for a fifth of the EU’s greenhouse gas emissions and increased its emissions by over a quarter since 1990. As already considered in the European Green Deal Communication, the Commission is proposing to include the building sector and road transport into emissions trading. The coverage of these sectors by emissions trading, when put in the context of other appropriate regulatory and investment measures for the sectors in question, would provide for increased and more harmonised economic incentives to reduce emissions across these sectors in the EU and increased certainty of delivery of the emission reductions for those sectors. Emissions trading for the buildings and road transport sectors should be introduced through separate but adjacent emissions trading. This will avoid any disturbance of the well-functioning emissions trading system for stationary installations and aviation, given the different reduction potentials in those sectors and different factors that influence the demand. Any possible merger of the two systems should be assessed only after a few years of functioning of the new emissions trading, based on experience. The extension to buildings and road transport requires an upstream approach to regulated entities. Market stability is crucial for the EU ETS to function correctly to achieve its targets. To ensure market stability, Decision (EU) 2015/1814 10 established the market stability reserve (MSR). It began operating in January 2019. The objectives of the MSR are to tackle historical supply-demand imbalances and to make the EU ETS more resilient to major imbalances. The mechanism must preserve regulatory stability and ensure long-term predictability. Article 3 of the Decision requires the Commission to review the functioning of the reserve within three years of the start of the operation. This review needs to be considered together with the effects for market stability of increasing the ambition of the EU ETS, so the necessary amendments to the reserve are proposed together with the amendments to the EU ETS with this proposal. In this context, this proposal, as part of the Fit for 55 package, has the following specific objectives: – strengthening the EU ETS in its current scope in order to provide the appropriate contribution to an overall target of at least -55 % GHG emissions compared to 1990; – ensuring continued effective protection for the sectors exposed to a significant risk of carbon leakage while incentivising the uptake of low-carbon technologies; – addressing the distributional and social effects of this transition, by reviewing the use of auctioning revenues and the size and functioning of the low-carbon funding mechanisms; – ensuring that the other sectors than those currently included in the EU ETS contribute cost-effectively to the emission reductions needed in line with EU targets and Paris Agreement commitments notably by including emissions from maritime transport and emissions from buildings and road transport under the rules of the EU ETS while ensuring synergies with other policies targeting those sectors; – reviewing the monitoring, reporting and verification system of CO 2 emissions from maritime transport to take into account the inclusion of the maritime transport sector in the EU ETS; – reviewing the market stability reserve in line with the corresponding legal obligation and examining possible amendments to its design, to fulfil the legal objectives in the MSR decision and to address any issues that may be raised in the context of the increased ambition.
Revised version (Article 5 Applications for greenhouse gas emissions permits):
An application to the competent authority for a greenhouse gas emissions permit shall include a description of: (a) the installation and its activities including the technology used; (b) the raw and auxiliary materials, the use of which is likely to lead to emissions of gases listed in Annex I; (c) the sources of emissions of gases listed in Annex I from the installation; and (d) the measures planned to monitor and report emissions in accordance with the acts referred to in Article 14. The application shall also include a non-technical summary of the details referred to in the first subparagraph.
Article 6 Conditions for and contents of the greenhouse gas emissions permit
1. The competent authority shall issue a greenhouse gas emissions permit granting authorisation to emit greenhouse gases from all or part of an installation if it is satisfied that the operator is capable of monitoring and reporting emissions. A greenhouse gas emissions permit may cover one or more installations on the same site operated by the same operator. The competent authority shall, at least every five years, review the greenhouse gas emissions permit and make any amendments as are appropriate. 2. Greenhouse gas emissions permits shall contain the following: (a) the name and address of the operator; (b) a description of the activities and emissions from the installation; (c) a monitoring plan that fulfils the requirements under the regulation referred to in Article 14. Member States may allow operators to update monitoring plans without changing the permit. Operators shall submit any updated monitoring plans to the competent authority for approval; (d) reporting requirements; and (e) an obligation to surrender allowances, other than allowances issued under Chapter II, equal to the total emissions of the installation in each calendar year, as verified in accordance with Article 15, within four months following the end of that year.
Amendment rationale: CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL Reasons for and objectives of the proposal The European Green Deal Communication 1 launched a new growth strategy for the EU that aims to transform the EU into a fair and prosperous society with a modern, resource-efficient and competitive economy. It reaffirms the Commission’s ambition to increase its climate targets and make Europe the first climate-neutral continent by 2050. Furthermore, it aims to protect the health and well-being of citizens from environment-related risks and impacts. The necessity and value of the European Green Deal have only grown in light of the very severe effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the health, living and working conditions and well-being of the Union’s citizens. Tackling climate change is an urgent challenge. In line with the scientific findings of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Special Report, global net-zero CO 2 emissions need to be achieved around 2050, and neutrality for all other greenhouse gases as soon as possible later in the century. This urgent challenge requires the EU to step up its action and demonstrate global leadership by becoming climate neutral by 2050. This objective is set out in the Communication ‘ A Clean Planet for all ’ - A European strategic long-term vision for a prosperous, modern, competitive and climate-neutral economy’ 2 . Based on the European Green Deal strategy and a comprehensive impact assessment, the Commission’s Communication of September 2020 on Stepping up Europe’s 2030 climate ambition 3 (‘2030 Climate Target Plan’) proposed to raise the EU's ambition and put forward a comprehensive plan to increase the European Union’s binding target for 2030 towards at least 55 % net emission reduction, in a responsible way. Raising the 2030 ambition now helps give certainty to policymakers and investors, so that decisions made in the coming years do not lock in emission levels inconsistent with the EU’s objective to be climate neutral by 2050. The 2030 target is in line with the Paris Agreement objective to keep the global temperature increase to well below 2°C and pursue efforts to keep it to 1.5°C. The European Council endorsed the new EU binding target for 2030 at its meeting of December 2020 4 . It also called on the Commission “ to assess how all economic sectors can best contribute to the 2030 target and to make the necessary proposals, accompanied by an in-depth examination of the environmental, economic and social impact at Member State level, taking into account national energy and climate plans and reviewing existing flexibilities ”. To this end, the European Climate Law 5 , as agreed with the co-legislators, makes the EU’s climate neutrality target legally binding, and raises the 2030 ambition by setting a target of at least 55 % net emission reductions by 2030 compared to 1990. In order to follow the pathway proposed in the European Climate Law, and deliver this increased level of ambition for 2030, the Commission has reviewed the climate and energy legislation currently in place that are expected to only reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 40 % by 2030 and by 60 % by 2050. This ‘ Fit for 55 ’ legislative package, as announced in the 2030 Climate Target Plan, is the most comprehensive building block in the efforts to implement the ambitious new 2030 climate target, and all economic sectors and policies will need to make their contribution. The European Council also invited the Commission in December 2020 to consider exploring ways to strengthen the EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS), while preserving its integrity and taking into account the need to address distributional concerns and energy poverty. The European Council also invited the Commission to consider proposing measures that enable energy-intensive industries to develop and deploy innovative climate-neutral technologies while maintaining their industrial competitiveness. The current ETS legislation was revised in 2018 to deliver a 43 % reduction in EU ETS emissions by 2030 compared to 2005, coherent with an EU economy-wide emissions reduction target of at least 40 % by 2030 compared to 1990. More recent analysis by the Commission services, however, indicates that, if the legislation remains unchanged, the sectors currently covered by the EU ETS would instead achieve emission reductions of -51 % in 2030 compared to 2005 6 . Even though this would mean outperforming the contribution of -43 % referred to above, it would still be an insufficient contribution to an overall target of at least -55 % compared to 1990. Therefore, the general objective of this initiative is to revise the ETS Directive in a manner commensurate with the 2030 climate ambition to reach at least 55 % net greenhouse gas emission reductions by 2030 below 1990 levels and with a gradual and balanced trajectory towards climate neutrality by 2050, in a cost-effective and coherent way while taking into account the need for a just transition and the need for all sectors to contribute to the EU’s climate efforts. As explained in the impact assessment, contribution of the sectors covered by the EU ETS of -61 % compared to 2005 is considered as best reflecting the 2030 Climate Target Plan results and is taken as the EU ETS ambition contributing to an overall target of at least -55 % compared to 1990. Increasing the EU ETS’s environmental contribution entails adjusting primarily the total number of allowances issued under the EU ETS (the ‘cap’). However, a reduced amount of allowances available to the market affects other pillars of the EU ETS and the carbon price. It impacts core principles such as the need for market stability, the protection against the risk of carbon leakage, the carefully balanced distributional effects between Member States, and the availability of funds for the increased investment needs in low-carbon technologies. At the same time as the EU ETS is brought in line with the overall target of at least -55 % compared to 1990, this increased climate ambition also needs to be reflected in the contribution to the EU’s climate efforts of sectors currently outside of the EU ETS. The impact assessment accompanying the 2030 Climate Target Plan found that in the absence of additional measures, emissions in certain sectors would not decrease as much as required to be on a path to achieve an economy-wide 55 % reduction in emissions. In fact, in maritime transport, emissions today are higher than in 1990, and maritime transport emissions are expected to grow further in a business-as-usual scenario . All pathways assessed as part of the 2030 Climate Target Plan and the Sustainable and Smart Mobility Strategy 7 envisage 80-82 % emissions reductions from international shipping by 2050 relative to 1990 (equivalent to 88-89 % emissions reductions relative to 2008) 8 , in order to be consistent with the increased level of climate ambition. Therefore, the European Commission undertook the commitment to extend the EU ETS to maritime transport as part of a basket of EU measures to address emissions from maritime transport , along with action agreed within the IMO. In this context, the Commission welcomes the progress that the European Parliament and the Council have made since 2019 on the proposal to amend Regulation (EU) 2015/757 9 in order to take appropriate account of the global data collection system for ship fuel oil consumption data ( COM(2019) 38 final) and the Commission takes note of the European Parliament’s Plenary support for the extension of the EU’s Emissions Trading System (EU ETS) to cover maritime transport emissions from 2023. Emissions from maritime transport should be included in the existing emissions trading system. To ensure a smooth transition, a phase-in period should be introduced where shipping companies would only have to surrender allowances for a portion of their verified emissions, gradually rising to 100 % over 4 years. As only around 90 million tons of CO 2 would be added through the extension to maritime transport to the existing ETS, the impact on the availability of allowances for other sectors covered would remain limited. To take into account the inclusion of the maritime sector in the EU ETS, Regulation (EU) 2015/757 should be amended, in particular as regards the reporting of aggregated emissions data at company level and considering the role of administering authorities in respect of shipping companies. These amendments complement those proposed in COM(2019) 38 final. As specified in the 2030 Climate Target Plan, the building sector is currently responsible directly and indirectly for 36 % of energy-related greenhouse gas emissions in the EU and has a large cost-effective potential to reduce emissions. More than half of those emissions are already covered by the existing ETS, notably the provision of electricity for use in buildings and most emissions of district heating. However, many homes are still heated with outdated systems that use polluting fossil fuels such as coal and oil. The sector of road transport also has a significant cost-effective reduction potential. Today, road transport accounts for a fifth of the EU’s greenhouse gas emissions and increased its emissions by over a quarter since 1990. As already considered in the European Green Deal Communication, the Commission is proposing to include the building sector and road transport into emissions trading. The coverage of these sectors by emissions trading, when put in the context of other appropriate regulatory and investment measures for the sectors in question, would provide for increased and more harmonised economic incentives to reduce emissions across these sectors in the EU and increased certainty of delivery of the emission reductions for those sectors. Emissions trading for the buildings and road transport sectors should be introduced through separate but adjacent emissions trading. This will avoid any disturbance of the well-functioning emissions trading system for stationary installations and aviation, given the different reduction potentials in those sectors and different factors that influence the demand. Any possible merger of the two systems should be assessed only after a few years of functioning of the new emissions trading, based on experience. The extension to buildings and road transport requires an upstream approach to regulated entities. Market stability is crucial for the EU ETS to function correctly to achieve its targets. To ensure market stability, Decision (EU) 2015/1814 10 established the market stability reserve (MSR). It began operating in January 2019. The objectives of the MSR are to tackle historical supply-demand imbalances and to make the EU ETS more resilient to major imbalances. The mechanism must preserve regulatory stability and ensure long-term predictability. Article 3 of the Decision requires the Commission to review the functioning of the reserve within three years of the start of the operation. This review needs to be considered together with the effects for market stability of increasing the ambition of the EU ETS, so the necessary amendments to the reserve are proposed together with the amendments to the EU ETS with this proposal. In this context, this proposal, as part of the Fit for 55 package, has the following specific objectives: – strengthening the EU ETS in its current scope in order to provide the appropriate contribution to an overall target of at least -55 % GHG emissions compared to 1990; – ensuring continued effective protection for the sectors exposed to a significant risk of carbon leakage while incentivising the uptake of low-carbon technologies; – addressing the distributional and social effects of this transition, by reviewing the use of auctioning revenues and the size and functioning of the low-carbon funding mechanisms; – ensuring that the other sectors than those currently included in the EU ETS contribute cost-effectively to the emission reductions needed in line with EU targets and Paris Agreement commitments notably by including emissions from maritime transport and emissions from buildings and road transport under the rules of the EU ETS while ensuring synergies with other policies targeting those sectors; – reviewing the monitoring, reporting and verification system of CO 2 emissions from maritime transport to take into account the inclusion of the maritime transport sector in the EU ETS; – reviewing the market stability reserve in line with the corresponding legal obligation and examining possible amendments to its design, to fulfil the legal objectives in the MSR decision and to address any issues that may be raised in the context of the increased ambition.
Revised version (Article 6 Conditions for and contents of the greenhouse gas emissions permit):
1. The competent authority shall issue a greenhouse gas emissions permit granting authorisation to emit greenhouse gases from all or part of an installation if it is satisfied that the operator is capable of monitoring and reporting emissions. A greenhouse gas emissions permit may cover one or more installations on the same site operated by the same operator.
Article 7 Changes relating to installations
The operator shall inform the competent authority of any planned changes to the nature or functioning of the installation, or any extension or significant reduction of its capacity, which may require updating the greenhouse gas emissions permit. Where appropriate, the competent authority shall update the permit. Where there is a change in the identity of the installation's operator, the competent authority shall update the permit to include the name and address of the new operator.