Article 223 
In accordance with conditions to be laid down by the Member States in whose territory goods or services are supplied, a summary invoice may be drawn up for several separate supplies of goods or services.
Amendment rationale: CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL 1. Article 97(1) of Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax[1] (hereinafter "the VAT Directive") provides that from 1 January 2006 until 31 December 2010 the standard rate may not be less than 15% and Article 97(2) stipulates that the Council shall decide, in accordance with Article 93 of the Treaty, on the level of the standard rate of value added tax (VAT) to be applied after 31 December 2010. 2. This provision was based on Article 93 of the Treaty establishing the European Community (the EC Treaty). As from 1 December 2009, Article 93 of the EC Treaty is replaced by Article 113 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU). Article 113 TFEU stipulates that the Council shall, acting unanimously in accordance with a special legislative procedure and after consulting the European Parliament and the Economic and Social Committee, adopt provisions for the harmonisation of legislation concerning turnover taxes to the extent that such harmonisation is necessary to ensure the establishment and functioning of the internal market and to avoid distortion of competition. 3. With a view to establishing the internal market on 1 January 1993, the Commission presented proposals intended to set up a definitive system of tax harmonisation. 4. However, when it became clear that it would be impossible to adopt the Commission's proposals before 1 January 1993, the Council decided to adopt a transitional system. With regard to VAT rates, it adopted Directive 92/77/EEC[2]. 5. That Directive introduced a system of minimum rates. It stipulated that from 1 January 1993 to 31 December 1996, the standard rate could not be set lower than 15%. This provision has been extended four times and applies until 31 December 2010. 6. To maintain the degree of harmonisation of rates already achieved, the Commission has twice presented proposals providing for a standard rate band with a minimum rate of 15% and a maximum rate of 25%[3]. The band was derived from the rates applied in practice in Member States, where standard rates have always varied between 15% and 25%. 7. In both cases, the proposals to approximate rates were amended by the Council,[4] which kept only the principle of a minimum rate, referring to a 15% minimum rate comparable to the system introduced by the 1992 Directive. 8. However, these Council Directives were adopted with a statement for the Council minutes mentioning Member States' efforts to avoid widening the 10 percentage point span between the lowest and highest rates applied. This demonstrates the continued concerns of Member States about distortions between high and low rate countries and the possible budgetary effects of different levels of VAT rates. In the light of the current economic crisis, there are further arguments for keeping a minimum standard rate to be laid down in the VAT Directive. 9. Despite various improvements to the common VAT system based on the Commission's pragmatic, phased VAT strategy launched in 2000[5] and updated in 2003[6], the VAT system continues to suffer from shortcomings and high administrative burdens. This means it needs to be fundamentally reassessed. New economic realities, technological processes, fraud patterns etc. also give rise to new challenges. That is why the Commission plans to publish a consultative green paper soon on a new VAT strategy. This will launch a consultation on future tax harmonisation. Only in the light of the outcome of that process can an appropriate decision be taken on the level of standard rates of VAT in the EU. 10. Moreover, recent modifications to the VAT Directive[7] have favoured taxation at the place of consumption, as this results in fewer possibilities for cross-border transactions seeking lower VAT rates, leading to distortions of competition. However, it remains important to prevent growing divergence in standard VAT rates applied by Member States from leading to structural imbalances in the EU and distortions of competition in some sectors of activity. To this end, it is common practice in the field of indirect taxes, both for excise duties and VAT, to set minimum rates. Although no maximum rate is proposed, the span between the standard rates applied in the Member States can – as is currently the case – be expected to ensure the proper functioning of the internal market while acknowledging the possible need for new budgetary resources from consumption taxes. 11. The accession of new Member States on 1 May 2004 and on 1 January 2007 did not alter the situation regarding the standard rate. That still ranges from 15% to 25% in 27 Member States. Two Member States (Cyprus and Luxembourg) apply a 15% rate and three a 25% rate (Denmark, Hungary and Sweden). 12. In these circumstances, it therefore appears appropriate to maintain the principle of a minimum standard VAT rate of 15%, and to propose that the current arrangements be extended. 13. To give businesses necessary legal certainty, and allow further evaluation of the appropriate level of the standard VAT rate at EU level, it seems appropriate to extend the provision for another five years, while the Commission reflects on a new VAT strategy and re-examines the standard VAT rate appropriate for a common approach. 14. Since the application of the minimum standard rate under Article 97(1) of Directive 2006/112/EC expires on 31 December 2010, the object of this proposal is to enable the Council to extend the period during which this rate applies. The minimum standard VAT rate is therefore set at 15% for five years from 1 January 2011 to 31 December 2015. The Commission would also expect the Council to renew the statement for the minutes agreed earlier on the span between the lowest and highest rates applied for that same period.
Article 224 
1. Invoices may be drawn up by the customer in respect of the supply to him, by a taxable person, of goods or services, if there is a prior agreement between the two parties and provided that a procedure exists for the acceptance of each invoice by the taxable person supplying the goods or services. 2. The Member States in whose territory the goods or services are supplied shall determine the terms and conditions of such prior agreements and of the acceptance procedures between the taxable person and the customer. 3. Member States may impose further conditions on taxable persons supplying goods or services in their territory concerning the issue of invoices by the customer. They may, in particular, require that such invoices be issued in the name and on behalf of the taxable person. The conditions referred to in the first subparagraph must always be the same wherever the customer is established.
Amendment rationale: CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL 1. Article 97(1) of Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax[1] (hereinafter "the VAT Directive") provides that from 1 January 2006 until 31 December 2010 the standard rate may not be less than 15% and Article 97(2) stipulates that the Council shall decide, in accordance with Article 93 of the Treaty, on the level of the standard rate of value added tax (VAT) to be applied after 31 December 2010. 2. This provision was based on Article 93 of the Treaty establishing the European Community (the EC Treaty). As from 1 December 2009, Article 93 of the EC Treaty is replaced by Article 113 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU). Article 113 TFEU stipulates that the Council shall, acting unanimously in accordance with a special legislative procedure and after consulting the European Parliament and the Economic and Social Committee, adopt provisions for the harmonisation of legislation concerning turnover taxes to the extent that such harmonisation is necessary to ensure the establishment and functioning of the internal market and to avoid distortion of competition. 3. With a view to establishing the internal market on 1 January 1993, the Commission presented proposals intended to set up a definitive system of tax harmonisation. 4. However, when it became clear that it would be impossible to adopt the Commission's proposals before 1 January 1993, the Council decided to adopt a transitional system. With regard to VAT rates, it adopted Directive 92/77/EEC[2]. 5. That Directive introduced a system of minimum rates. It stipulated that from 1 January 1993 to 31 December 1996, the standard rate could not be set lower than 15%. This provision has been extended four times and applies until 31 December 2010. 6. To maintain the degree of harmonisation of rates already achieved, the Commission has twice presented proposals providing for a standard rate band with a minimum rate of 15% and a maximum rate of 25%[3]. The band was derived from the rates applied in practice in Member States, where standard rates have always varied between 15% and 25%. 7. In both cases, the proposals to approximate rates were amended by the Council,[4] which kept only the principle of a minimum rate, referring to a 15% minimum rate comparable to the system introduced by the 1992 Directive. 8. However, these Council Directives were adopted with a statement for the Council minutes mentioning Member States' efforts to avoid widening the 10 percentage point span between the lowest and highest rates applied. This demonstrates the continued concerns of Member States about distortions between high and low rate countries and the possible budgetary effects of different levels of VAT rates. In the light of the current economic crisis, there are further arguments for keeping a minimum standard rate to be laid down in the VAT Directive. 9. Despite various improvements to the common VAT system based on the Commission's pragmatic, phased VAT strategy launched in 2000[5] and updated in 2003[6], the VAT system continues to suffer from shortcomings and high administrative burdens. This means it needs to be fundamentally reassessed. New economic realities, technological processes, fraud patterns etc. also give rise to new challenges. That is why the Commission plans to publish a consultative green paper soon on a new VAT strategy. This will launch a consultation on future tax harmonisation. Only in the light of the outcome of that process can an appropriate decision be taken on the level of standard rates of VAT in the EU. 10. Moreover, recent modifications to the VAT Directive[7] have favoured taxation at the place of consumption, as this results in fewer possibilities for cross-border transactions seeking lower VAT rates, leading to distortions of competition. However, it remains important to prevent growing divergence in standard VAT rates applied by Member States from leading to structural imbalances in the EU and distortions of competition in some sectors of activity. To this end, it is common practice in the field of indirect taxes, both for excise duties and VAT, to set minimum rates. Although no maximum rate is proposed, the span between the standard rates applied in the Member States can – as is currently the case – be expected to ensure the proper functioning of the internal market while acknowledging the possible need for new budgetary resources from consumption taxes. 11. The accession of new Member States on 1 May 2004 and on 1 January 2007 did not alter the situation regarding the standard rate. That still ranges from 15% to 25% in 27 Member States. Two Member States (Cyprus and Luxembourg) apply a 15% rate and three a 25% rate (Denmark, Hungary and Sweden). 12. In these circumstances, it therefore appears appropriate to maintain the principle of a minimum standard VAT rate of 15%, and to propose that the current arrangements be extended. 13. To give businesses necessary legal certainty, and allow further evaluation of the appropriate level of the standard VAT rate at EU level, it seems appropriate to extend the provision for another five years, while the Commission reflects on a new VAT strategy and re-examines the standard VAT rate appropriate for a common approach. 14. Since the application of the minimum standard rate under Article 97(1) of Directive 2006/112/EC expires on 31 December 2010, the object of this proposal is to enable the Council to extend the period during which this rate applies. The minimum standard VAT rate is therefore set at 15% for five years from 1 January 2011 to 31 December 2015. The Commission would also expect the Council to renew the statement for the minutes agreed earlier on the span between the lowest and highest rates applied for that same period.
Revised version (Article 224 ):
Invoices may be drawn up by the customer in respect of the supply to him, by a taxable person, of goods or services, where there is a prior agreement between the two parties and provided that a procedure exists for the acceptance of each invoice by the taxable person supplying the goods or services. Member State may require that such invoices be issued in the name and on behalf of the taxable person.
Article 225 
Member States may impose specific conditions on taxable persons supplying goods or services in their territory in cases where the third party, or the customer, who issues invoices is established in a country with which no legal instrument exists relating to mutual assistance similar in scope to that provided for in Directive 76/308/EEC and Regulation (EC) No 1798/2003.
Amendment rationale: CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL 1. Article 97(1) of Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax[1] (hereinafter "the VAT Directive") provides that from 1 January 2006 until 31 December 2010 the standard rate may not be less than 15% and Article 97(2) stipulates that the Council shall decide, in accordance with Article 93 of the Treaty, on the level of the standard rate of value added tax (VAT) to be applied after 31 December 2010. 2. This provision was based on Article 93 of the Treaty establishing the European Community (the EC Treaty). As from 1 December 2009, Article 93 of the EC Treaty is replaced by Article 113 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU). Article 113 TFEU stipulates that the Council shall, acting unanimously in accordance with a special legislative procedure and after consulting the European Parliament and the Economic and Social Committee, adopt provisions for the harmonisation of legislation concerning turnover taxes to the extent that such harmonisation is necessary to ensure the establishment and functioning of the internal market and to avoid distortion of competition. 3. With a view to establishing the internal market on 1 January 1993, the Commission presented proposals intended to set up a definitive system of tax harmonisation. 4. However, when it became clear that it would be impossible to adopt the Commission's proposals before 1 January 1993, the Council decided to adopt a transitional system. With regard to VAT rates, it adopted Directive 92/77/EEC[2]. 5. That Directive introduced a system of minimum rates. It stipulated that from 1 January 1993 to 31 December 1996, the standard rate could not be set lower than 15%. This provision has been extended four times and applies until 31 December 2010. 6. To maintain the degree of harmonisation of rates already achieved, the Commission has twice presented proposals providing for a standard rate band with a minimum rate of 15% and a maximum rate of 25%[3]. The band was derived from the rates applied in practice in Member States, where standard rates have always varied between 15% and 25%. 7. In both cases, the proposals to approximate rates were amended by the Council,[4] which kept only the principle of a minimum rate, referring to a 15% minimum rate comparable to the system introduced by the 1992 Directive. 8. However, these Council Directives were adopted with a statement for the Council minutes mentioning Member States' efforts to avoid widening the 10 percentage point span between the lowest and highest rates applied. This demonstrates the continued concerns of Member States about distortions between high and low rate countries and the possible budgetary effects of different levels of VAT rates. In the light of the current economic crisis, there are further arguments for keeping a minimum standard rate to be laid down in the VAT Directive. 9. Despite various improvements to the common VAT system based on the Commission's pragmatic, phased VAT strategy launched in 2000[5] and updated in 2003[6], the VAT system continues to suffer from shortcomings and high administrative burdens. This means it needs to be fundamentally reassessed. New economic realities, technological processes, fraud patterns etc. also give rise to new challenges. That is why the Commission plans to publish a consultative green paper soon on a new VAT strategy. This will launch a consultation on future tax harmonisation. Only in the light of the outcome of that process can an appropriate decision be taken on the level of standard rates of VAT in the EU. 10. Moreover, recent modifications to the VAT Directive[7] have favoured taxation at the place of consumption, as this results in fewer possibilities for cross-border transactions seeking lower VAT rates, leading to distortions of competition. However, it remains important to prevent growing divergence in standard VAT rates applied by Member States from leading to structural imbalances in the EU and distortions of competition in some sectors of activity. To this end, it is common practice in the field of indirect taxes, both for excise duties and VAT, to set minimum rates. Although no maximum rate is proposed, the span between the standard rates applied in the Member States can – as is currently the case – be expected to ensure the proper functioning of the internal market while acknowledging the possible need for new budgetary resources from consumption taxes. 11. The accession of new Member States on 1 May 2004 and on 1 January 2007 did not alter the situation regarding the standard rate. That still ranges from 15% to 25% in 27 Member States. Two Member States (Cyprus and Luxembourg) apply a 15% rate and three a 25% rate (Denmark, Hungary and Sweden). 12. In these circumstances, it therefore appears appropriate to maintain the principle of a minimum standard VAT rate of 15%, and to propose that the current arrangements be extended. 13. To give businesses necessary legal certainty, and allow further evaluation of the appropriate level of the standard VAT rate at EU level, it seems appropriate to extend the provision for another five years, while the Commission reflects on a new VAT strategy and re-examines the standard VAT rate appropriate for a common approach. 14. Since the application of the minimum standard rate under Article 97(1) of Directive 2006/112/EC expires on 31 December 2010, the object of this proposal is to enable the Council to extend the period during which this rate applies. The minimum standard VAT rate is therefore set at 15% for five years from 1 January 2011 to 31 December 2015. The Commission would also expect the Council to renew the statement for the minutes agreed earlier on the span between the lowest and highest rates applied for that same period.
Revised version (Article 225 ):
Member States may impose specific conditions on taxable persons in cases where the third party, or the customer, who issues invoices is established in a country with which no legal instrument exists relating to mutual assistance similar in scope to that provided for in Directive 2010/24/EU ( 13 ) and Regulation (EC) No 1798/2003 ( 14 ).
Article 226 
Without prejudice to the particular provisions laid down in this Directive, only the following details are required for VAT purposes on invoices issued pursuant to Articles 220 and 221: (1) the date of issue; (2) a sequential number, based on one or more series, which uniquely identifies the invoice; (3) the VAT identification number referred to in Article 214 under which the taxable person supplied the goods or services; (4) the customer's VAT identification number, as referred to in Article 214, under which the customer received a supply of goods or services in respect of which he is liable for payment of VAT, or received a supply of goods as referred to in Article 138; (5) the full name and address of the taxable person and of the customer; (6) the quantity and nature of the goods supplied or the extent and nature of the services rendered; (7) the date on which the supply of goods or services was made or completed or the date on which the payment on account referred to in points (4) and (5) of Article 220 was made, in so far as that date can be determined and differs from the date of issue of the invoice; (8) the taxable amount per rate or exemption, the unit price exclusive of VAT and any discounts or rebates if they are not included in the unit price; (9) the VAT rate applied; (10) the VAT amount payable, except where a special arrangement is applied under which, in accordance with this Directive, such a detail is excluded; (11) in the case of an exemption or where the customer is liable for payment of VAT, reference to the applicable provision of this Directive, or to the corresponding national provision, or any other reference indicating that the supply of goods or services is exempt or subject to the reverse charge procedure; (12) in the case of the supply of a new means of transport made in accordance with the conditions specified in Article 138(1) and (2)(a), the characteristics as identified in point (b) of Article 2(2); (13) where the margin scheme for travel agents is applied, reference to Article 306, or to the corresponding national provisions, or any other reference indicating that the margin scheme has been applied; (14) where one of the special arrangements applicable to second-hand goods, works of art, collectors' items and antiques is applied, reference to Articles 313, 326 or 333, or to the corresponding national provisions, or any other reference indicating that one of those arrangements has been applied; (15) where the person liable for payment of VAT is a tax representative for the purposes of Article 204, the VAT identification number, referred to in Article 214, of that tax representative, together with his full name and address.
Amendment rationale: CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL 1. Article 97(1) of Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax[1] (hereinafter "the VAT Directive") provides that from 1 January 2006 until 31 December 2010 the standard rate may not be less than 15% and Article 97(2) stipulates that the Council shall decide, in accordance with Article 93 of the Treaty, on the level of the standard rate of value added tax (VAT) to be applied after 31 December 2010. 2. This provision was based on Article 93 of the Treaty establishing the European Community (the EC Treaty). As from 1 December 2009, Article 93 of the EC Treaty is replaced by Article 113 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU). Article 113 TFEU stipulates that the Council shall, acting unanimously in accordance with a special legislative procedure and after consulting the European Parliament and the Economic and Social Committee, adopt provisions for the harmonisation of legislation concerning turnover taxes to the extent that such harmonisation is necessary to ensure the establishment and functioning of the internal market and to avoid distortion of competition. 3. With a view to establishing the internal market on 1 January 1993, the Commission presented proposals intended to set up a definitive system of tax harmonisation. 4. However, when it became clear that it would be impossible to adopt the Commission's proposals before 1 January 1993, the Council decided to adopt a transitional system. With regard to VAT rates, it adopted Directive 92/77/EEC[2]. 5. That Directive introduced a system of minimum rates. It stipulated that from 1 January 1993 to 31 December 1996, the standard rate could not be set lower than 15%. This provision has been extended four times and applies until 31 December 2010. 6. To maintain the degree of harmonisation of rates already achieved, the Commission has twice presented proposals providing for a standard rate band with a minimum rate of 15% and a maximum rate of 25%[3]. The band was derived from the rates applied in practice in Member States, where standard rates have always varied between 15% and 25%. 7. In both cases, the proposals to approximate rates were amended by the Council,[4] which kept only the principle of a minimum rate, referring to a 15% minimum rate comparable to the system introduced by the 1992 Directive. 8. However, these Council Directives were adopted with a statement for the Council minutes mentioning Member States' efforts to avoid widening the 10 percentage point span between the lowest and highest rates applied. This demonstrates the continued concerns of Member States about distortions between high and low rate countries and the possible budgetary effects of different levels of VAT rates. In the light of the current economic crisis, there are further arguments for keeping a minimum standard rate to be laid down in the VAT Directive. 9. Despite various improvements to the common VAT system based on the Commission's pragmatic, phased VAT strategy launched in 2000[5] and updated in 2003[6], the VAT system continues to suffer from shortcomings and high administrative burdens. This means it needs to be fundamentally reassessed. New economic realities, technological processes, fraud patterns etc. also give rise to new challenges. That is why the Commission plans to publish a consultative green paper soon on a new VAT strategy. This will launch a consultation on future tax harmonisation. Only in the light of the outcome of that process can an appropriate decision be taken on the level of standard rates of VAT in the EU. 10. Moreover, recent modifications to the VAT Directive[7] have favoured taxation at the place of consumption, as this results in fewer possibilities for cross-border transactions seeking lower VAT rates, leading to distortions of competition. However, it remains important to prevent growing divergence in standard VAT rates applied by Member States from leading to structural imbalances in the EU and distortions of competition in some sectors of activity. To this end, it is common practice in the field of indirect taxes, both for excise duties and VAT, to set minimum rates. Although no maximum rate is proposed, the span between the standard rates applied in the Member States can – as is currently the case – be expected to ensure the proper functioning of the internal market while acknowledging the possible need for new budgetary resources from consumption taxes. 11. The accession of new Member States on 1 May 2004 and on 1 January 2007 did not alter the situation regarding the standard rate. That still ranges from 15% to 25% in 27 Member States. Two Member States (Cyprus and Luxembourg) apply a 15% rate and three a 25% rate (Denmark, Hungary and Sweden). 12. In these circumstances, it therefore appears appropriate to maintain the principle of a minimum standard VAT rate of 15%, and to propose that the current arrangements be extended. 13. To give businesses necessary legal certainty, and allow further evaluation of the appropriate level of the standard VAT rate at EU level, it seems appropriate to extend the provision for another five years, while the Commission reflects on a new VAT strategy and re-examines the standard VAT rate appropriate for a common approach. 14. Since the application of the minimum standard rate under Article 97(1) of Directive 2006/112/EC expires on 31 December 2010, the object of this proposal is to enable the Council to extend the period during which this rate applies. The minimum standard VAT rate is therefore set at 15% for five years from 1 January 2011 to 31 December 2015. The Commission would also expect the Council to renew the statement for the minutes agreed earlier on the span between the lowest and highest rates applied for that same period.
Revised version (Article 226 ):
Without prejudice to the particular provisions laid down in this Directive, only the following details are required for VAT purposes on invoices issued pursuant to Articles 220 and 221: (1) the date of issue; (2) a sequential number, based on one or more series, which uniquely identifies the invoice; (3) the VAT identification number referred to in Article 214 under which the taxable person supplied the goods or services; (4) the customer's VAT identification number, as referred to in Article 214, under which the customer received a supply of goods or services in respect of which he is liable for payment of VAT, or received a supply of goods as referred to in Article 138; (5) the full name and address of the taxable person and of the customer; (6) the quantity and nature of the goods supplied or the extent and nature of the services rendered; (7) the date on which the supply of goods or services was made or completed or the date on which the payment on account referred to in points (4) and (5) of Article 220 was made, in so far as that date can be determined and differs from the date of issue of the invoice; (7a) where the VAT becomes chargeable at the time when the payment is received in accordance with Article 66(b) and the right of deduction arises at the time the deductible tax becomes chargeable, the mention ‘Cash accounting’; (8) the taxable amount per rate or exemption, the unit price exclusive of VAT and any discounts or rebates if they are not included in the unit price; (9) the VAT rate applied; (10) the VAT amount payable, except where a special arrangement is applied under which, in accordance with this Directive, such a detail is excluded; (10a) where the customer receiving a supply issues the invoice instead of the supplier, the mention ‘Self-billing’; (11) in the case of an exemption, reference to the applicable provision of this Directive, or to the corresponding national provision, or any other reference indicating that the supply of goods or services is exempt; (11a) where the customer is liable for the payment of the VAT, the mention ‘Reverse charge’; (12) in the case of the supply of a new means of transport made in accordance with the conditions specified in Article 138(1) and (2)(a), the characteristics as identified in point (b) of Article 2(2); (13) where the margin scheme for travel agents is applied, the mention ‘Margin scheme — Travel agents’; (14) where one of the special arrangements applicable to second-hand goods, works of art, collectors’ items and antiques is applied, the mention ‘Margin scheme — Second-hand goods’; ‘Margin scheme — Works of art’ or ‘Margin scheme — Collector’s items and antiques’ respectively; (15) where the person liable for payment of VAT is a tax representative for the purposes of Article 204, the VAT identification number, referred to in Article 214, of that tax representative, together with his full name and address.
Article 227 
Member States may require taxable persons established in their territory and supplying goods or services there to indicate the VAT identification number, referred to in Article 214, of the customer in cases other than those referred to in point (4) of Article 226.
Article 228 
Member States in whose territory goods or services are supplied may allow some of the compulsory details to be omitted from documents or messages treated as invoices pursuant to Article 219.
Amendment rationale: CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL 1. Article 97(1) of Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax[1] (hereinafter "the VAT Directive") provides that from 1 January 2006 until 31 December 2010 the standard rate may not be less than 15% and Article 97(2) stipulates that the Council shall decide, in accordance with Article 93 of the Treaty, on the level of the standard rate of value added tax (VAT) to be applied after 31 December 2010. 2. This provision was based on Article 93 of the Treaty establishing the European Community (the EC Treaty). As from 1 December 2009, Article 93 of the EC Treaty is replaced by Article 113 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU). Article 113 TFEU stipulates that the Council shall, acting unanimously in accordance with a special legislative procedure and after consulting the European Parliament and the Economic and Social Committee, adopt provisions for the harmonisation of legislation concerning turnover taxes to the extent that such harmonisation is necessary to ensure the establishment and functioning of the internal market and to avoid distortion of competition. 3. With a view to establishing the internal market on 1 January 1993, the Commission presented proposals intended to set up a definitive system of tax harmonisation. 4. However, when it became clear that it would be impossible to adopt the Commission's proposals before 1 January 1993, the Council decided to adopt a transitional system. With regard to VAT rates, it adopted Directive 92/77/EEC[2]. 5. That Directive introduced a system of minimum rates. It stipulated that from 1 January 1993 to 31 December 1996, the standard rate could not be set lower than 15%. This provision has been extended four times and applies until 31 December 2010. 6. To maintain the degree of harmonisation of rates already achieved, the Commission has twice presented proposals providing for a standard rate band with a minimum rate of 15% and a maximum rate of 25%[3]. The band was derived from the rates applied in practice in Member States, where standard rates have always varied between 15% and 25%. 7. In both cases, the proposals to approximate rates were amended by the Council,[4] which kept only the principle of a minimum rate, referring to a 15% minimum rate comparable to the system introduced by the 1992 Directive. 8. However, these Council Directives were adopted with a statement for the Council minutes mentioning Member States' efforts to avoid widening the 10 percentage point span between the lowest and highest rates applied. This demonstrates the continued concerns of Member States about distortions between high and low rate countries and the possible budgetary effects of different levels of VAT rates. In the light of the current economic crisis, there are further arguments for keeping a minimum standard rate to be laid down in the VAT Directive. 9. Despite various improvements to the common VAT system based on the Commission's pragmatic, phased VAT strategy launched in 2000[5] and updated in 2003[6], the VAT system continues to suffer from shortcomings and high administrative burdens. This means it needs to be fundamentally reassessed. New economic realities, technological processes, fraud patterns etc. also give rise to new challenges. That is why the Commission plans to publish a consultative green paper soon on a new VAT strategy. This will launch a consultation on future tax harmonisation. Only in the light of the outcome of that process can an appropriate decision be taken on the level of standard rates of VAT in the EU. 10. Moreover, recent modifications to the VAT Directive[7] have favoured taxation at the place of consumption, as this results in fewer possibilities for cross-border transactions seeking lower VAT rates, leading to distortions of competition. However, it remains important to prevent growing divergence in standard VAT rates applied by Member States from leading to structural imbalances in the EU and distortions of competition in some sectors of activity. To this end, it is common practice in the field of indirect taxes, both for excise duties and VAT, to set minimum rates. Although no maximum rate is proposed, the span between the standard rates applied in the Member States can – as is currently the case – be expected to ensure the proper functioning of the internal market while acknowledging the possible need for new budgetary resources from consumption taxes. 11. The accession of new Member States on 1 May 2004 and on 1 January 2007 did not alter the situation regarding the standard rate. That still ranges from 15% to 25% in 27 Member States. Two Member States (Cyprus and Luxembourg) apply a 15% rate and three a 25% rate (Denmark, Hungary and Sweden). 12. In these circumstances, it therefore appears appropriate to maintain the principle of a minimum standard VAT rate of 15%, and to propose that the current arrangements be extended. 13. To give businesses necessary legal certainty, and allow further evaluation of the appropriate level of the standard VAT rate at EU level, it seems appropriate to extend the provision for another five years, while the Commission reflects on a new VAT strategy and re-examines the standard VAT rate appropriate for a common approach. 14. Since the application of the minimum standard rate under Article 97(1) of Directive 2006/112/EC expires on 31 December 2010, the object of this proposal is to enable the Council to extend the period during which this rate applies. The minimum standard VAT rate is therefore set at 15% for five years from 1 January 2011 to 31 December 2015. The Commission would also expect the Council to renew the statement for the minutes agreed earlier on the span between the lowest and highest rates applied for that same period.
Article 229 
Member States shall not require invoices to be signed.
Article 230 
The amounts which appear on the invoice may be expressed in any currency, provided that the amount of VAT payable is expressed in the national currency of the Member State in which the supply of goods or services takes place, using the conversion mechanism laid down in Article 91.
Amendment rationale: CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL 1. Article 97(1) of Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax[1] (hereinafter "the VAT Directive") provides that from 1 January 2006 until 31 December 2010 the standard rate may not be less than 15% and Article 97(2) stipulates that the Council shall decide, in accordance with Article 93 of the Treaty, on the level of the standard rate of value added tax (VAT) to be applied after 31 December 2010. 2. This provision was based on Article 93 of the Treaty establishing the European Community (the EC Treaty). As from 1 December 2009, Article 93 of the EC Treaty is replaced by Article 113 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU). Article 113 TFEU stipulates that the Council shall, acting unanimously in accordance with a special legislative procedure and after consulting the European Parliament and the Economic and Social Committee, adopt provisions for the harmonisation of legislation concerning turnover taxes to the extent that such harmonisation is necessary to ensure the establishment and functioning of the internal market and to avoid distortion of competition. 3. With a view to establishing the internal market on 1 January 1993, the Commission presented proposals intended to set up a definitive system of tax harmonisation. 4. However, when it became clear that it would be impossible to adopt the Commission's proposals before 1 January 1993, the Council decided to adopt a transitional system. With regard to VAT rates, it adopted Directive 92/77/EEC[2]. 5. That Directive introduced a system of minimum rates. It stipulated that from 1 January 1993 to 31 December 1996, the standard rate could not be set lower than 15%. This provision has been extended four times and applies until 31 December 2010. 6. To maintain the degree of harmonisation of rates already achieved, the Commission has twice presented proposals providing for a standard rate band with a minimum rate of 15% and a maximum rate of 25%[3]. The band was derived from the rates applied in practice in Member States, where standard rates have always varied between 15% and 25%. 7. In both cases, the proposals to approximate rates were amended by the Council,[4] which kept only the principle of a minimum rate, referring to a 15% minimum rate comparable to the system introduced by the 1992 Directive. 8. However, these Council Directives were adopted with a statement for the Council minutes mentioning Member States' efforts to avoid widening the 10 percentage point span between the lowest and highest rates applied. This demonstrates the continued concerns of Member States about distortions between high and low rate countries and the possible budgetary effects of different levels of VAT rates. In the light of the current economic crisis, there are further arguments for keeping a minimum standard rate to be laid down in the VAT Directive. 9. Despite various improvements to the common VAT system based on the Commission's pragmatic, phased VAT strategy launched in 2000[5] and updated in 2003[6], the VAT system continues to suffer from shortcomings and high administrative burdens. This means it needs to be fundamentally reassessed. New economic realities, technological processes, fraud patterns etc. also give rise to new challenges. That is why the Commission plans to publish a consultative green paper soon on a new VAT strategy. This will launch a consultation on future tax harmonisation. Only in the light of the outcome of that process can an appropriate decision be taken on the level of standard rates of VAT in the EU. 10. Moreover, recent modifications to the VAT Directive[7] have favoured taxation at the place of consumption, as this results in fewer possibilities for cross-border transactions seeking lower VAT rates, leading to distortions of competition. However, it remains important to prevent growing divergence in standard VAT rates applied by Member States from leading to structural imbalances in the EU and distortions of competition in some sectors of activity. To this end, it is common practice in the field of indirect taxes, both for excise duties and VAT, to set minimum rates. Although no maximum rate is proposed, the span between the standard rates applied in the Member States can – as is currently the case – be expected to ensure the proper functioning of the internal market while acknowledging the possible need for new budgetary resources from consumption taxes. 11. The accession of new Member States on 1 May 2004 and on 1 January 2007 did not alter the situation regarding the standard rate. That still ranges from 15% to 25% in 27 Member States. Two Member States (Cyprus and Luxembourg) apply a 15% rate and three a 25% rate (Denmark, Hungary and Sweden). 12. In these circumstances, it therefore appears appropriate to maintain the principle of a minimum standard VAT rate of 15%, and to propose that the current arrangements be extended. 13. To give businesses necessary legal certainty, and allow further evaluation of the appropriate level of the standard VAT rate at EU level, it seems appropriate to extend the provision for another five years, while the Commission reflects on a new VAT strategy and re-examines the standard VAT rate appropriate for a common approach. 14. Since the application of the minimum standard rate under Article 97(1) of Directive 2006/112/EC expires on 31 December 2010, the object of this proposal is to enable the Council to extend the period during which this rate applies. The minimum standard VAT rate is therefore set at 15% for five years from 1 January 2011 to 31 December 2015. The Commission would also expect the Council to renew the statement for the minutes agreed earlier on the span between the lowest and highest rates applied for that same period.
Revised version (Article 230 ):
The amounts which appear on the invoice may be expressed in any currency, provided that the amount of VAT payable or to be adjusted is expressed in the national currency of the Member State, using the conversion rate mechanism provided for in Article 91.
Article 231 
For control purposes, Member States may require invoices in respect of supplies of goods or services in their territory and invoices received by taxable persons established in their territory to be translated into their national languages.
Amendment rationale: CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL 1. Article 97(1) of Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax[1] (hereinafter "the VAT Directive") provides that from 1 January 2006 until 31 December 2010 the standard rate may not be less than 15% and Article 97(2) stipulates that the Council shall decide, in accordance with Article 93 of the Treaty, on the level of the standard rate of value added tax (VAT) to be applied after 31 December 2010. 2. This provision was based on Article 93 of the Treaty establishing the European Community (the EC Treaty). As from 1 December 2009, Article 93 of the EC Treaty is replaced by Article 113 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU). Article 113 TFEU stipulates that the Council shall, acting unanimously in accordance with a special legislative procedure and after consulting the European Parliament and the Economic and Social Committee, adopt provisions for the harmonisation of legislation concerning turnover taxes to the extent that such harmonisation is necessary to ensure the establishment and functioning of the internal market and to avoid distortion of competition. 3. With a view to establishing the internal market on 1 January 1993, the Commission presented proposals intended to set up a definitive system of tax harmonisation. 4. However, when it became clear that it would be impossible to adopt the Commission's proposals before 1 January 1993, the Council decided to adopt a transitional system. With regard to VAT rates, it adopted Directive 92/77/EEC[2]. 5. That Directive introduced a system of minimum rates. It stipulated that from 1 January 1993 to 31 December 1996, the standard rate could not be set lower than 15%. This provision has been extended four times and applies until 31 December 2010. 6. To maintain the degree of harmonisation of rates already achieved, the Commission has twice presented proposals providing for a standard rate band with a minimum rate of 15% and a maximum rate of 25%[3]. The band was derived from the rates applied in practice in Member States, where standard rates have always varied between 15% and 25%. 7. In both cases, the proposals to approximate rates were amended by the Council,[4] which kept only the principle of a minimum rate, referring to a 15% minimum rate comparable to the system introduced by the 1992 Directive. 8. However, these Council Directives were adopted with a statement for the Council minutes mentioning Member States' efforts to avoid widening the 10 percentage point span between the lowest and highest rates applied. This demonstrates the continued concerns of Member States about distortions between high and low rate countries and the possible budgetary effects of different levels of VAT rates. In the light of the current economic crisis, there are further arguments for keeping a minimum standard rate to be laid down in the VAT Directive. 9. Despite various improvements to the common VAT system based on the Commission's pragmatic, phased VAT strategy launched in 2000[5] and updated in 2003[6], the VAT system continues to suffer from shortcomings and high administrative burdens. This means it needs to be fundamentally reassessed. New economic realities, technological processes, fraud patterns etc. also give rise to new challenges. That is why the Commission plans to publish a consultative green paper soon on a new VAT strategy. This will launch a consultation on future tax harmonisation. Only in the light of the outcome of that process can an appropriate decision be taken on the level of standard rates of VAT in the EU. 10. Moreover, recent modifications to the VAT Directive[7] have favoured taxation at the place of consumption, as this results in fewer possibilities for cross-border transactions seeking lower VAT rates, leading to distortions of competition. However, it remains important to prevent growing divergence in standard VAT rates applied by Member States from leading to structural imbalances in the EU and distortions of competition in some sectors of activity. To this end, it is common practice in the field of indirect taxes, both for excise duties and VAT, to set minimum rates. Although no maximum rate is proposed, the span between the standard rates applied in the Member States can – as is currently the case – be expected to ensure the proper functioning of the internal market while acknowledging the possible need for new budgetary resources from consumption taxes. 11. The accession of new Member States on 1 May 2004 and on 1 January 2007 did not alter the situation regarding the standard rate. That still ranges from 15% to 25% in 27 Member States. Two Member States (Cyprus and Luxembourg) apply a 15% rate and three a 25% rate (Denmark, Hungary and Sweden). 12. In these circumstances, it therefore appears appropriate to maintain the principle of a minimum standard VAT rate of 15%, and to propose that the current arrangements be extended. 13. To give businesses necessary legal certainty, and allow further evaluation of the appropriate level of the standard VAT rate at EU level, it seems appropriate to extend the provision for another five years, while the Commission reflects on a new VAT strategy and re-examines the standard VAT rate appropriate for a common approach. 14. Since the application of the minimum standard rate under Article 97(1) of Directive 2006/112/EC expires on 31 December 2010, the object of this proposal is to enable the Council to extend the period during which this rate applies. The minimum standard VAT rate is therefore set at 15% for five years from 1 January 2011 to 31 December 2015. The Commission would also expect the Council to renew the statement for the minutes agreed earlier on the span between the lowest and highest rates applied for that same period.
Article 232 
Invoices issued pursuant to Section 2 may be sent on paper or, subject to acceptance by the recipient, they may be sent or made available by electronic means.
Amendment rationale: CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL 1. Article 97(1) of Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax[1] (hereinafter "the VAT Directive") provides that from 1 January 2006 until 31 December 2010 the standard rate may not be less than 15% and Article 97(2) stipulates that the Council shall decide, in accordance with Article 93 of the Treaty, on the level of the standard rate of value added tax (VAT) to be applied after 31 December 2010. 2. This provision was based on Article 93 of the Treaty establishing the European Community (the EC Treaty). As from 1 December 2009, Article 93 of the EC Treaty is replaced by Article 113 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU). Article 113 TFEU stipulates that the Council shall, acting unanimously in accordance with a special legislative procedure and after consulting the European Parliament and the Economic and Social Committee, adopt provisions for the harmonisation of legislation concerning turnover taxes to the extent that such harmonisation is necessary to ensure the establishment and functioning of the internal market and to avoid distortion of competition. 3. With a view to establishing the internal market on 1 January 1993, the Commission presented proposals intended to set up a definitive system of tax harmonisation. 4. However, when it became clear that it would be impossible to adopt the Commission's proposals before 1 January 1993, the Council decided to adopt a transitional system. With regard to VAT rates, it adopted Directive 92/77/EEC[2]. 5. That Directive introduced a system of minimum rates. It stipulated that from 1 January 1993 to 31 December 1996, the standard rate could not be set lower than 15%. This provision has been extended four times and applies until 31 December 2010. 6. To maintain the degree of harmonisation of rates already achieved, the Commission has twice presented proposals providing for a standard rate band with a minimum rate of 15% and a maximum rate of 25%[3]. The band was derived from the rates applied in practice in Member States, where standard rates have always varied between 15% and 25%. 7. In both cases, the proposals to approximate rates were amended by the Council,[4] which kept only the principle of a minimum rate, referring to a 15% minimum rate comparable to the system introduced by the 1992 Directive. 8. However, these Council Directives were adopted with a statement for the Council minutes mentioning Member States' efforts to avoid widening the 10 percentage point span between the lowest and highest rates applied. This demonstrates the continued concerns of Member States about distortions between high and low rate countries and the possible budgetary effects of different levels of VAT rates. In the light of the current economic crisis, there are further arguments for keeping a minimum standard rate to be laid down in the VAT Directive. 9. Despite various improvements to the common VAT system based on the Commission's pragmatic, phased VAT strategy launched in 2000[5] and updated in 2003[6], the VAT system continues to suffer from shortcomings and high administrative burdens. This means it needs to be fundamentally reassessed. New economic realities, technological processes, fraud patterns etc. also give rise to new challenges. That is why the Commission plans to publish a consultative green paper soon on a new VAT strategy. This will launch a consultation on future tax harmonisation. Only in the light of the outcome of that process can an appropriate decision be taken on the level of standard rates of VAT in the EU. 10. Moreover, recent modifications to the VAT Directive[7] have favoured taxation at the place of consumption, as this results in fewer possibilities for cross-border transactions seeking lower VAT rates, leading to distortions of competition. However, it remains important to prevent growing divergence in standard VAT rates applied by Member States from leading to structural imbalances in the EU and distortions of competition in some sectors of activity. To this end, it is common practice in the field of indirect taxes, both for excise duties and VAT, to set minimum rates. Although no maximum rate is proposed, the span between the standard rates applied in the Member States can – as is currently the case – be expected to ensure the proper functioning of the internal market while acknowledging the possible need for new budgetary resources from consumption taxes. 11. The accession of new Member States on 1 May 2004 and on 1 January 2007 did not alter the situation regarding the standard rate. That still ranges from 15% to 25% in 27 Member States. Two Member States (Cyprus and Luxembourg) apply a 15% rate and three a 25% rate (Denmark, Hungary and Sweden). 12. In these circumstances, it therefore appears appropriate to maintain the principle of a minimum standard VAT rate of 15%, and to propose that the current arrangements be extended. 13. To give businesses necessary legal certainty, and allow further evaluation of the appropriate level of the standard VAT rate at EU level, it seems appropriate to extend the provision for another five years, while the Commission reflects on a new VAT strategy and re-examines the standard VAT rate appropriate for a common approach. 14. Since the application of the minimum standard rate under Article 97(1) of Directive 2006/112/EC expires on 31 December 2010, the object of this proposal is to enable the Council to extend the period during which this rate applies. The minimum standard VAT rate is therefore set at 15% for five years from 1 January 2011 to 31 December 2015. The Commission would also expect the Council to renew the statement for the minutes agreed earlier on the span between the lowest and highest rates applied for that same period.
Revised version (Article 232 ):
The use of an electronic invoice shall be subject to acceptance by the recipient.
Article 233 
1. Invoices sent or made available by electronic means shall be accepted by Member States provided that the authenticity of the origin and the integrity of their content are guaranteed by one of the following methods: (a) by means of an advanced electronic signature within the meaning of point (2) of Article 2 of Directive 1999/93/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 1999 on a Community framework for electronic signatures ( 13 ); (b) by means of electronic data interchange (EDI), as defined in Article 2 of Commission Recommendation 1994/820/EC of 19 October 1994 relating to the legal aspects of electronic data interchange ( 14 ), if the agreement relating to the exchange provides for the use of procedures guaranteeing the authenticity of the origin and integrity of the data. Invoices may, however, be sent or made available by other electronic means, subject to acceptance by the Member States concerned. 2. For the purposes of point (a) of the first subparagraph of paragraph 1, Member States may also ask for the advanced electronic signature to be based on a qualified certificate and created by a secure-signature-creation device, within the meaning of points (6) and (10) of Article 2 of Directive 1999/93/EC. 3. For the purposes of point (b) of the first subparagraph of paragraph 1, Member States may also, subject to conditions which they lay down, require that an additional summary document on paper be sent.
Amendment rationale: CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL 1. Article 97(1) of Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax[1] (hereinafter "the VAT Directive") provides that from 1 January 2006 until 31 December 2010 the standard rate may not be less than 15% and Article 97(2) stipulates that the Council shall decide, in accordance with Article 93 of the Treaty, on the level of the standard rate of value added tax (VAT) to be applied after 31 December 2010. 2. This provision was based on Article 93 of the Treaty establishing the European Community (the EC Treaty). As from 1 December 2009, Article 93 of the EC Treaty is replaced by Article 113 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU). Article 113 TFEU stipulates that the Council shall, acting unanimously in accordance with a special legislative procedure and after consulting the European Parliament and the Economic and Social Committee, adopt provisions for the harmonisation of legislation concerning turnover taxes to the extent that such harmonisation is necessary to ensure the establishment and functioning of the internal market and to avoid distortion of competition. 3. With a view to establishing the internal market on 1 January 1993, the Commission presented proposals intended to set up a definitive system of tax harmonisation. 4. However, when it became clear that it would be impossible to adopt the Commission's proposals before 1 January 1993, the Council decided to adopt a transitional system. With regard to VAT rates, it adopted Directive 92/77/EEC[2]. 5. That Directive introduced a system of minimum rates. It stipulated that from 1 January 1993 to 31 December 1996, the standard rate could not be set lower than 15%. This provision has been extended four times and applies until 31 December 2010. 6. To maintain the degree of harmonisation of rates already achieved, the Commission has twice presented proposals providing for a standard rate band with a minimum rate of 15% and a maximum rate of 25%[3]. The band was derived from the rates applied in practice in Member States, where standard rates have always varied between 15% and 25%. 7. In both cases, the proposals to approximate rates were amended by the Council,[4] which kept only the principle of a minimum rate, referring to a 15% minimum rate comparable to the system introduced by the 1992 Directive. 8. However, these Council Directives were adopted with a statement for the Council minutes mentioning Member States' efforts to avoid widening the 10 percentage point span between the lowest and highest rates applied. This demonstrates the continued concerns of Member States about distortions between high and low rate countries and the possible budgetary effects of different levels of VAT rates. In the light of the current economic crisis, there are further arguments for keeping a minimum standard rate to be laid down in the VAT Directive. 9. Despite various improvements to the common VAT system based on the Commission's pragmatic, phased VAT strategy launched in 2000[5] and updated in 2003[6], the VAT system continues to suffer from shortcomings and high administrative burdens. This means it needs to be fundamentally reassessed. New economic realities, technological processes, fraud patterns etc. also give rise to new challenges. That is why the Commission plans to publish a consultative green paper soon on a new VAT strategy. This will launch a consultation on future tax harmonisation. Only in the light of the outcome of that process can an appropriate decision be taken on the level of standard rates of VAT in the EU. 10. Moreover, recent modifications to the VAT Directive[7] have favoured taxation at the place of consumption, as this results in fewer possibilities for cross-border transactions seeking lower VAT rates, leading to distortions of competition. However, it remains important to prevent growing divergence in standard VAT rates applied by Member States from leading to structural imbalances in the EU and distortions of competition in some sectors of activity. To this end, it is common practice in the field of indirect taxes, both for excise duties and VAT, to set minimum rates. Although no maximum rate is proposed, the span between the standard rates applied in the Member States can – as is currently the case – be expected to ensure the proper functioning of the internal market while acknowledging the possible need for new budgetary resources from consumption taxes. 11. The accession of new Member States on 1 May 2004 and on 1 January 2007 did not alter the situation regarding the standard rate. That still ranges from 15% to 25% in 27 Member States. Two Member States (Cyprus and Luxembourg) apply a 15% rate and three a 25% rate (Denmark, Hungary and Sweden). 12. In these circumstances, it therefore appears appropriate to maintain the principle of a minimum standard VAT rate of 15%, and to propose that the current arrangements be extended. 13. To give businesses necessary legal certainty, and allow further evaluation of the appropriate level of the standard VAT rate at EU level, it seems appropriate to extend the provision for another five years, while the Commission reflects on a new VAT strategy and re-examines the standard VAT rate appropriate for a common approach. 14. Since the application of the minimum standard rate under Article 97(1) of Directive 2006/112/EC expires on 31 December 2010, the object of this proposal is to enable the Council to extend the period during which this rate applies. The minimum standard VAT rate is therefore set at 15% for five years from 1 January 2011 to 31 December 2015. The Commission would also expect the Council to renew the statement for the minutes agreed earlier on the span between the lowest and highest rates applied for that same period.
Revised version (Article 233 ):
1. The authenticity of the origin, the integrity of the content and the legibility of an invoice, whether on paper or in electronic form, shall be ensured from the point in time of issue until the end of the period for storage of the invoice. Each taxable person shall determine the way to ensure the authenticity of the origin, the integrity of the content and the legibility of the invoice. This may be achieved by any business controls which create a reliable audit trail between an invoice and a supply of goods or services. ‘Authenticity of the origin’ means the assurance of the identity of the supplier or the issuer of the invoice. ‘Integrity of the content’ means that the content required according to this Directive has not been altered. 2. Other than by way of the type of business controls described in paragraph 1, the following are examples of technologies that ensure the authenticity of the origin and the integrity of the content of an electronic invoice: (a) an advanced electronic signature within the meaning of point (2) of Article 2 of Directive 1999/93/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 1999 on a Community framework for electronic signatures ( 15 ), based on a qualified certificate and created by a secure signature creation device, within the meaning of points (6) and (10) of Article 2 of Directive 1999/93/EC; (b) electronic data interchange (EDI), as defined in Article 2 of Annex 1 to Commission Recommendation 1994/820/EC of 19 October 1994 relating to the legal aspects of electronic data interchange ( 16 ), where the agreement relating to the exchange provides for the use of procedures guaranteeing the authenticity of the origin and integrity of the data.
Article 234 
Member States may not impose on taxable persons supplying goods or services in their territory any other obligations or formalities relating to the sending or making available of invoices by electronic means.
Amendment rationale: CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL 1. Article 97(1) of Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax[1] (hereinafter "the VAT Directive") provides that from 1 January 2006 until 31 December 2010 the standard rate may not be less than 15% and Article 97(2) stipulates that the Council shall decide, in accordance with Article 93 of the Treaty, on the level of the standard rate of value added tax (VAT) to be applied after 31 December 2010. 2. This provision was based on Article 93 of the Treaty establishing the European Community (the EC Treaty). As from 1 December 2009, Article 93 of the EC Treaty is replaced by Article 113 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU). Article 113 TFEU stipulates that the Council shall, acting unanimously in accordance with a special legislative procedure and after consulting the European Parliament and the Economic and Social Committee, adopt provisions for the harmonisation of legislation concerning turnover taxes to the extent that such harmonisation is necessary to ensure the establishment and functioning of the internal market and to avoid distortion of competition. 3. With a view to establishing the internal market on 1 January 1993, the Commission presented proposals intended to set up a definitive system of tax harmonisation. 4. However, when it became clear that it would be impossible to adopt the Commission's proposals before 1 January 1993, the Council decided to adopt a transitional system. With regard to VAT rates, it adopted Directive 92/77/EEC[2]. 5. That Directive introduced a system of minimum rates. It stipulated that from 1 January 1993 to 31 December 1996, the standard rate could not be set lower than 15%. This provision has been extended four times and applies until 31 December 2010. 6. To maintain the degree of harmonisation of rates already achieved, the Commission has twice presented proposals providing for a standard rate band with a minimum rate of 15% and a maximum rate of 25%[3]. The band was derived from the rates applied in practice in Member States, where standard rates have always varied between 15% and 25%. 7. In both cases, the proposals to approximate rates were amended by the Council,[4] which kept only the principle of a minimum rate, referring to a 15% minimum rate comparable to the system introduced by the 1992 Directive. 8. However, these Council Directives were adopted with a statement for the Council minutes mentioning Member States' efforts to avoid widening the 10 percentage point span between the lowest and highest rates applied. This demonstrates the continued concerns of Member States about distortions between high and low rate countries and the possible budgetary effects of different levels of VAT rates. In the light of the current economic crisis, there are further arguments for keeping a minimum standard rate to be laid down in the VAT Directive. 9. Despite various improvements to the common VAT system based on the Commission's pragmatic, phased VAT strategy launched in 2000[5] and updated in 2003[6], the VAT system continues to suffer from shortcomings and high administrative burdens. This means it needs to be fundamentally reassessed. New economic realities, technological processes, fraud patterns etc. also give rise to new challenges. That is why the Commission plans to publish a consultative green paper soon on a new VAT strategy. This will launch a consultation on future tax harmonisation. Only in the light of the outcome of that process can an appropriate decision be taken on the level of standard rates of VAT in the EU. 10. Moreover, recent modifications to the VAT Directive[7] have favoured taxation at the place of consumption, as this results in fewer possibilities for cross-border transactions seeking lower VAT rates, leading to distortions of competition. However, it remains important to prevent growing divergence in standard VAT rates applied by Member States from leading to structural imbalances in the EU and distortions of competition in some sectors of activity. To this end, it is common practice in the field of indirect taxes, both for excise duties and VAT, to set minimum rates. Although no maximum rate is proposed, the span between the standard rates applied in the Member States can – as is currently the case – be expected to ensure the proper functioning of the internal market while acknowledging the possible need for new budgetary resources from consumption taxes. 11. The accession of new Member States on 1 May 2004 and on 1 January 2007 did not alter the situation regarding the standard rate. That still ranges from 15% to 25% in 27 Member States. Two Member States (Cyprus and Luxembourg) apply a 15% rate and three a 25% rate (Denmark, Hungary and Sweden). 12. In these circumstances, it therefore appears appropriate to maintain the principle of a minimum standard VAT rate of 15%, and to propose that the current arrangements be extended. 13. To give businesses necessary legal certainty, and allow further evaluation of the appropriate level of the standard VAT rate at EU level, it seems appropriate to extend the provision for another five years, while the Commission reflects on a new VAT strategy and re-examines the standard VAT rate appropriate for a common approach. 14. Since the application of the minimum standard rate under Article 97(1) of Directive 2006/112/EC expires on 31 December 2010, the object of this proposal is to enable the Council to extend the period during which this rate applies. The minimum standard VAT rate is therefore set at 15% for five years from 1 January 2011 to 31 December 2015. The Commission would also expect the Council to renew the statement for the minutes agreed earlier on the span between the lowest and highest rates applied for that same period.
Article 235 
Member States may lay down specific conditions for invoices issued by electronic means in respect of goods or services supplied in their territory from a country with which no legal instrument exists relating to mutual assistance similar in scope to that provided for in Directive 76/308/EEC and Regulation (EC) No 1798/2003.
Amendment rationale: CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL 1. Article 97(1) of Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax[1] (hereinafter "the VAT Directive") provides that from 1 January 2006 until 31 December 2010 the standard rate may not be less than 15% and Article 97(2) stipulates that the Council shall decide, in accordance with Article 93 of the Treaty, on the level of the standard rate of value added tax (VAT) to be applied after 31 December 2010. 2. This provision was based on Article 93 of the Treaty establishing the European Community (the EC Treaty). As from 1 December 2009, Article 93 of the EC Treaty is replaced by Article 113 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU). Article 113 TFEU stipulates that the Council shall, acting unanimously in accordance with a special legislative procedure and after consulting the European Parliament and the Economic and Social Committee, adopt provisions for the harmonisation of legislation concerning turnover taxes to the extent that such harmonisation is necessary to ensure the establishment and functioning of the internal market and to avoid distortion of competition. 3. With a view to establishing the internal market on 1 January 1993, the Commission presented proposals intended to set up a definitive system of tax harmonisation. 4. However, when it became clear that it would be impossible to adopt the Commission's proposals before 1 January 1993, the Council decided to adopt a transitional system. With regard to VAT rates, it adopted Directive 92/77/EEC[2]. 5. That Directive introduced a system of minimum rates. It stipulated that from 1 January 1993 to 31 December 1996, the standard rate could not be set lower than 15%. This provision has been extended four times and applies until 31 December 2010. 6. To maintain the degree of harmonisation of rates already achieved, the Commission has twice presented proposals providing for a standard rate band with a minimum rate of 15% and a maximum rate of 25%[3]. The band was derived from the rates applied in practice in Member States, where standard rates have always varied between 15% and 25%. 7. In both cases, the proposals to approximate rates were amended by the Council,[4] which kept only the principle of a minimum rate, referring to a 15% minimum rate comparable to the system introduced by the 1992 Directive. 8. However, these Council Directives were adopted with a statement for the Council minutes mentioning Member States' efforts to avoid widening the 10 percentage point span between the lowest and highest rates applied. This demonstrates the continued concerns of Member States about distortions between high and low rate countries and the possible budgetary effects of different levels of VAT rates. In the light of the current economic crisis, there are further arguments for keeping a minimum standard rate to be laid down in the VAT Directive. 9. Despite various improvements to the common VAT system based on the Commission's pragmatic, phased VAT strategy launched in 2000[5] and updated in 2003[6], the VAT system continues to suffer from shortcomings and high administrative burdens. This means it needs to be fundamentally reassessed. New economic realities, technological processes, fraud patterns etc. also give rise to new challenges. That is why the Commission plans to publish a consultative green paper soon on a new VAT strategy. This will launch a consultation on future tax harmonisation. Only in the light of the outcome of that process can an appropriate decision be taken on the level of standard rates of VAT in the EU. 10. Moreover, recent modifications to the VAT Directive[7] have favoured taxation at the place of consumption, as this results in fewer possibilities for cross-border transactions seeking lower VAT rates, leading to distortions of competition. However, it remains important to prevent growing divergence in standard VAT rates applied by Member States from leading to structural imbalances in the EU and distortions of competition in some sectors of activity. To this end, it is common practice in the field of indirect taxes, both for excise duties and VAT, to set minimum rates. Although no maximum rate is proposed, the span between the standard rates applied in the Member States can – as is currently the case – be expected to ensure the proper functioning of the internal market while acknowledging the possible need for new budgetary resources from consumption taxes. 11. The accession of new Member States on 1 May 2004 and on 1 January 2007 did not alter the situation regarding the standard rate. That still ranges from 15% to 25% in 27 Member States. Two Member States (Cyprus and Luxembourg) apply a 15% rate and three a 25% rate (Denmark, Hungary and Sweden). 12. In these circumstances, it therefore appears appropriate to maintain the principle of a minimum standard VAT rate of 15%, and to propose that the current arrangements be extended. 13. To give businesses necessary legal certainty, and allow further evaluation of the appropriate level of the standard VAT rate at EU level, it seems appropriate to extend the provision for another five years, while the Commission reflects on a new VAT strategy and re-examines the standard VAT rate appropriate for a common approach. 14. Since the application of the minimum standard rate under Article 97(1) of Directive 2006/112/EC expires on 31 December 2010, the object of this proposal is to enable the Council to extend the period during which this rate applies. The minimum standard VAT rate is therefore set at 15% for five years from 1 January 2011 to 31 December 2015. The Commission would also expect the Council to renew the statement for the minutes agreed earlier on the span between the lowest and highest rates applied for that same period.
Revised version (Article 235 ):
Member States may lay down specific conditions for electronic invoices issued in respect of goods or services supplied in their territory from a country with which no legal instrument exists relating to mutual assistance similar in scope to that provided for in Directive 2010/24/EU and Regulation (EC) No 1798/2003.
Article 236 
Where batches containing several invoices are sent or made available to the same recipient by electronic means, the details common to the individual invoices may be mentioned only once if, for each invoice, all the information is accessible.
Amendment rationale: CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL 1. Article 97(1) of Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax[1] (hereinafter "the VAT Directive") provides that from 1 January 2006 until 31 December 2010 the standard rate may not be less than 15% and Article 97(2) stipulates that the Council shall decide, in accordance with Article 93 of the Treaty, on the level of the standard rate of value added tax (VAT) to be applied after 31 December 2010. 2. This provision was based on Article 93 of the Treaty establishing the European Community (the EC Treaty). As from 1 December 2009, Article 93 of the EC Treaty is replaced by Article 113 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU). Article 113 TFEU stipulates that the Council shall, acting unanimously in accordance with a special legislative procedure and after consulting the European Parliament and the Economic and Social Committee, adopt provisions for the harmonisation of legislation concerning turnover taxes to the extent that such harmonisation is necessary to ensure the establishment and functioning of the internal market and to avoid distortion of competition. 3. With a view to establishing the internal market on 1 January 1993, the Commission presented proposals intended to set up a definitive system of tax harmonisation. 4. However, when it became clear that it would be impossible to adopt the Commission's proposals before 1 January 1993, the Council decided to adopt a transitional system. With regard to VAT rates, it adopted Directive 92/77/EEC[2]. 5. That Directive introduced a system of minimum rates. It stipulated that from 1 January 1993 to 31 December 1996, the standard rate could not be set lower than 15%. This provision has been extended four times and applies until 31 December 2010. 6. To maintain the degree of harmonisation of rates already achieved, the Commission has twice presented proposals providing for a standard rate band with a minimum rate of 15% and a maximum rate of 25%[3]. The band was derived from the rates applied in practice in Member States, where standard rates have always varied between 15% and 25%. 7. In both cases, the proposals to approximate rates were amended by the Council,[4] which kept only the principle of a minimum rate, referring to a 15% minimum rate comparable to the system introduced by the 1992 Directive. 8. However, these Council Directives were adopted with a statement for the Council minutes mentioning Member States' efforts to avoid widening the 10 percentage point span between the lowest and highest rates applied. This demonstrates the continued concerns of Member States about distortions between high and low rate countries and the possible budgetary effects of different levels of VAT rates. In the light of the current economic crisis, there are further arguments for keeping a minimum standard rate to be laid down in the VAT Directive. 9. Despite various improvements to the common VAT system based on the Commission's pragmatic, phased VAT strategy launched in 2000[5] and updated in 2003[6], the VAT system continues to suffer from shortcomings and high administrative burdens. This means it needs to be fundamentally reassessed. New economic realities, technological processes, fraud patterns etc. also give rise to new challenges. That is why the Commission plans to publish a consultative green paper soon on a new VAT strategy. This will launch a consultation on future tax harmonisation. Only in the light of the outcome of that process can an appropriate decision be taken on the level of standard rates of VAT in the EU. 10. Moreover, recent modifications to the VAT Directive[7] have favoured taxation at the place of consumption, as this results in fewer possibilities for cross-border transactions seeking lower VAT rates, leading to distortions of competition. However, it remains important to prevent growing divergence in standard VAT rates applied by Member States from leading to structural imbalances in the EU and distortions of competition in some sectors of activity. To this end, it is common practice in the field of indirect taxes, both for excise duties and VAT, to set minimum rates. Although no maximum rate is proposed, the span between the standard rates applied in the Member States can – as is currently the case – be expected to ensure the proper functioning of the internal market while acknowledging the possible need for new budgetary resources from consumption taxes. 11. The accession of new Member States on 1 May 2004 and on 1 January 2007 did not alter the situation regarding the standard rate. That still ranges from 15% to 25% in 27 Member States. Two Member States (Cyprus and Luxembourg) apply a 15% rate and three a 25% rate (Denmark, Hungary and Sweden). 12. In these circumstances, it therefore appears appropriate to maintain the principle of a minimum standard VAT rate of 15%, and to propose that the current arrangements be extended. 13. To give businesses necessary legal certainty, and allow further evaluation of the appropriate level of the standard VAT rate at EU level, it seems appropriate to extend the provision for another five years, while the Commission reflects on a new VAT strategy and re-examines the standard VAT rate appropriate for a common approach. 14. Since the application of the minimum standard rate under Article 97(1) of Directive 2006/112/EC expires on 31 December 2010, the object of this proposal is to enable the Council to extend the period during which this rate applies. The minimum standard VAT rate is therefore set at 15% for five years from 1 January 2011 to 31 December 2015. The Commission would also expect the Council to renew the statement for the minutes agreed earlier on the span between the lowest and highest rates applied for that same period.
Revised version (Article 236 ):
Where batches containing several electronic invoices are sent or made available to the same recipient, the details common to the individual invoices may be mentioned only once where, for each invoice, all the information is accessible.
Article 237 
The Commission shall present, at the latest on 31 December 2008, a report and, if appropriate, a proposal amending the conditions applicable to electronic invoicing in order to take account of future technological developments in that field.
Amendment rationale: CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL 1. Article 97(1) of Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax[1] (hereinafter "the VAT Directive") provides that from 1 January 2006 until 31 December 2010 the standard rate may not be less than 15% and Article 97(2) stipulates that the Council shall decide, in accordance with Article 93 of the Treaty, on the level of the standard rate of value added tax (VAT) to be applied after 31 December 2010. 2. This provision was based on Article 93 of the Treaty establishing the European Community (the EC Treaty). As from 1 December 2009, Article 93 of the EC Treaty is replaced by Article 113 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU). Article 113 TFEU stipulates that the Council shall, acting unanimously in accordance with a special legislative procedure and after consulting the European Parliament and the Economic and Social Committee, adopt provisions for the harmonisation of legislation concerning turnover taxes to the extent that such harmonisation is necessary to ensure the establishment and functioning of the internal market and to avoid distortion of competition. 3. With a view to establishing the internal market on 1 January 1993, the Commission presented proposals intended to set up a definitive system of tax harmonisation. 4. However, when it became clear that it would be impossible to adopt the Commission's proposals before 1 January 1993, the Council decided to adopt a transitional system. With regard to VAT rates, it adopted Directive 92/77/EEC[2]. 5. That Directive introduced a system of minimum rates. It stipulated that from 1 January 1993 to 31 December 1996, the standard rate could not be set lower than 15%. This provision has been extended four times and applies until 31 December 2010. 6. To maintain the degree of harmonisation of rates already achieved, the Commission has twice presented proposals providing for a standard rate band with a minimum rate of 15% and a maximum rate of 25%[3]. The band was derived from the rates applied in practice in Member States, where standard rates have always varied between 15% and 25%. 7. In both cases, the proposals to approximate rates were amended by the Council,[4] which kept only the principle of a minimum rate, referring to a 15% minimum rate comparable to the system introduced by the 1992 Directive. 8. However, these Council Directives were adopted with a statement for the Council minutes mentioning Member States' efforts to avoid widening the 10 percentage point span between the lowest and highest rates applied. This demonstrates the continued concerns of Member States about distortions between high and low rate countries and the possible budgetary effects of different levels of VAT rates. In the light of the current economic crisis, there are further arguments for keeping a minimum standard rate to be laid down in the VAT Directive. 9. Despite various improvements to the common VAT system based on the Commission's pragmatic, phased VAT strategy launched in 2000[5] and updated in 2003[6], the VAT system continues to suffer from shortcomings and high administrative burdens. This means it needs to be fundamentally reassessed. New economic realities, technological processes, fraud patterns etc. also give rise to new challenges. That is why the Commission plans to publish a consultative green paper soon on a new VAT strategy. This will launch a consultation on future tax harmonisation. Only in the light of the outcome of that process can an appropriate decision be taken on the level of standard rates of VAT in the EU. 10. Moreover, recent modifications to the VAT Directive[7] have favoured taxation at the place of consumption, as this results in fewer possibilities for cross-border transactions seeking lower VAT rates, leading to distortions of competition. However, it remains important to prevent growing divergence in standard VAT rates applied by Member States from leading to structural imbalances in the EU and distortions of competition in some sectors of activity. To this end, it is common practice in the field of indirect taxes, both for excise duties and VAT, to set minimum rates. Although no maximum rate is proposed, the span between the standard rates applied in the Member States can – as is currently the case – be expected to ensure the proper functioning of the internal market while acknowledging the possible need for new budgetary resources from consumption taxes. 11. The accession of new Member States on 1 May 2004 and on 1 January 2007 did not alter the situation regarding the standard rate. That still ranges from 15% to 25% in 27 Member States. Two Member States (Cyprus and Luxembourg) apply a 15% rate and three a 25% rate (Denmark, Hungary and Sweden). 12. In these circumstances, it therefore appears appropriate to maintain the principle of a minimum standard VAT rate of 15%, and to propose that the current arrangements be extended. 13. To give businesses necessary legal certainty, and allow further evaluation of the appropriate level of the standard VAT rate at EU level, it seems appropriate to extend the provision for another five years, while the Commission reflects on a new VAT strategy and re-examines the standard VAT rate appropriate for a common approach. 14. Since the application of the minimum standard rate under Article 97(1) of Directive 2006/112/EC expires on 31 December 2010, the object of this proposal is to enable the Council to extend the period during which this rate applies. The minimum standard VAT rate is therefore set at 15% for five years from 1 January 2011 to 31 December 2015. The Commission would also expect the Council to renew the statement for the minutes agreed earlier on the span between the lowest and highest rates applied for that same period.
Revised version (Article 237 ):
By 31 December 2016 at the latest, the Commission shall present to the European Parliament and the Council an overall assessment report, based on an independent economic study, on the impact of the invoicing rules applicable from 1 January 2013 and notably on the extent to which they have effectively led to a decrease in administrative burdens for businesses, accompanied where necessary by an appropriate proposal to amend the relevant rules.
Article 238 
1. After consulting the VAT Committee, Member States may, in accordance with conditions which they may lay down, provide that in the following cases some of the information required under Article 226 and 230, subject to options taken up by Member States under Articles 227, 228 and 231, need not be entered on invoices in respect of supplies of goods or services in their territory: (a) where the amount of the invoice is minor; (b) where commercial or administrative practice in the business sector concerned or the technical conditions under which the invoices are issued make it difficult to comply with all the obligations referred to in Articles 226 and 230. 2. Invoices must, in any event, contain the following information: (a) the date of issue; (b) identification of the taxable person; (c) identification of the type of goods or services supplied; (d) the VAT amount payable or the information needed to calculate it. 3. The simplified arrangements provided for in paragraph 1 may not be applied to the transactions referred to in Articles 20, 21, 22, 33, 36, 138 and 141.
Amendment rationale: CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL 1. Article 97(1) of Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax[1] (hereinafter "the VAT Directive") provides that from 1 January 2006 until 31 December 2010 the standard rate may not be less than 15% and Article 97(2) stipulates that the Council shall decide, in accordance with Article 93 of the Treaty, on the level of the standard rate of value added tax (VAT) to be applied after 31 December 2010. 2. This provision was based on Article 93 of the Treaty establishing the European Community (the EC Treaty). As from 1 December 2009, Article 93 of the EC Treaty is replaced by Article 113 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU). Article 113 TFEU stipulates that the Council shall, acting unanimously in accordance with a special legislative procedure and after consulting the European Parliament and the Economic and Social Committee, adopt provisions for the harmonisation of legislation concerning turnover taxes to the extent that such harmonisation is necessary to ensure the establishment and functioning of the internal market and to avoid distortion of competition. 3. With a view to establishing the internal market on 1 January 1993, the Commission presented proposals intended to set up a definitive system of tax harmonisation. 4. However, when it became clear that it would be impossible to adopt the Commission's proposals before 1 January 1993, the Council decided to adopt a transitional system. With regard to VAT rates, it adopted Directive 92/77/EEC[2]. 5. That Directive introduced a system of minimum rates. It stipulated that from 1 January 1993 to 31 December 1996, the standard rate could not be set lower than 15%. This provision has been extended four times and applies until 31 December 2010. 6. To maintain the degree of harmonisation of rates already achieved, the Commission has twice presented proposals providing for a standard rate band with a minimum rate of 15% and a maximum rate of 25%[3]. The band was derived from the rates applied in practice in Member States, where standard rates have always varied between 15% and 25%. 7. In both cases, the proposals to approximate rates were amended by the Council,[4] which kept only the principle of a minimum rate, referring to a 15% minimum rate comparable to the system introduced by the 1992 Directive. 8. However, these Council Directives were adopted with a statement for the Council minutes mentioning Member States' efforts to avoid widening the 10 percentage point span between the lowest and highest rates applied. This demonstrates the continued concerns of Member States about distortions between high and low rate countries and the possible budgetary effects of different levels of VAT rates. In the light of the current economic crisis, there are further arguments for keeping a minimum standard rate to be laid down in the VAT Directive. 9. Despite various improvements to the common VAT system based on the Commission's pragmatic, phased VAT strategy launched in 2000[5] and updated in 2003[6], the VAT system continues to suffer from shortcomings and high administrative burdens. This means it needs to be fundamentally reassessed. New economic realities, technological processes, fraud patterns etc. also give rise to new challenges. That is why the Commission plans to publish a consultative green paper soon on a new VAT strategy. This will launch a consultation on future tax harmonisation. Only in the light of the outcome of that process can an appropriate decision be taken on the level of standard rates of VAT in the EU. 10. Moreover, recent modifications to the VAT Directive[7] have favoured taxation at the place of consumption, as this results in fewer possibilities for cross-border transactions seeking lower VAT rates, leading to distortions of competition. However, it remains important to prevent growing divergence in standard VAT rates applied by Member States from leading to structural imbalances in the EU and distortions of competition in some sectors of activity. To this end, it is common practice in the field of indirect taxes, both for excise duties and VAT, to set minimum rates. Although no maximum rate is proposed, the span between the standard rates applied in the Member States can – as is currently the case – be expected to ensure the proper functioning of the internal market while acknowledging the possible need for new budgetary resources from consumption taxes. 11. The accession of new Member States on 1 May 2004 and on 1 January 2007 did not alter the situation regarding the standard rate. That still ranges from 15% to 25% in 27 Member States. Two Member States (Cyprus and Luxembourg) apply a 15% rate and three a 25% rate (Denmark, Hungary and Sweden). 12. In these circumstances, it therefore appears appropriate to maintain the principle of a minimum standard VAT rate of 15%, and to propose that the current arrangements be extended. 13. To give businesses necessary legal certainty, and allow further evaluation of the appropriate level of the standard VAT rate at EU level, it seems appropriate to extend the provision for another five years, while the Commission reflects on a new VAT strategy and re-examines the standard VAT rate appropriate for a common approach. 14. Since the application of the minimum standard rate under Article 97(1) of Directive 2006/112/EC expires on 31 December 2010, the object of this proposal is to enable the Council to extend the period during which this rate applies. The minimum standard VAT rate is therefore set at 15% for five years from 1 January 2011 to 31 December 2015. The Commission would also expect the Council to renew the statement for the minutes agreed earlier on the span between the lowest and highest rates applied for that same period.
Revised version (Article 238 ):
1. After consulting the VAT Committee, Member States may, in accordance with conditions which they may lay down, provide that in the following cases only the information required pursuant to Article 226b shall be entered on invoices in respect of supplies of goods or services: (a) where the amount of the invoice is higher than EUR 100 but not higher than EUR 400, or the equivalent in national currency; (b) where commercial or administrative practice in the business sector concerned or the technical conditions under which the invoices are issued make it particularly difficult to comply with all the obligations referred to in Article 226 or 230. 3. The simplified arrangements provided for in paragraph 1 shall not be applied where invoices are required to be issued pursuant to points (2) and (3) of Article 220(1) or where the taxable supply of goods or services is carried out by a taxable person who is not established in the Member State in which the VAT is due or whose establishment in that Member State does not intervene in the supply within the meaning of Article 192a and the person liable for the payment of VAT is the person to whom the goods or services are supplied.
Article 239 
In cases where Member States make use of the option under point (b) of the first subparagraph of Article 272(1) of not allocating a VAT identification number to taxable persons who do not carry out any of the transactions referred to in Articles 20, 21, 22, 33, 36, 138 and 141, and where the supplier or the customer has not been allocated an identification number of that type, another number called the tax reference number, as defined by the Member States concerned, shall be entered on the invoice instead.
Article 240 
Where the taxable person has been allocated a VAT identification number, the Member States exercising the option under point (b) of the first subparagraph of Article 272(1) may also require the invoice to show the following: (1) in respect of the supply of services, as referred to in Articles 44, 47, 50, 53, 54 and 55, and the supply of goods, as referred to in Articles 138 and 141, the VAT identification number and the tax reference number of the supplier; (2) in respect of other supplies of goods or services, only the tax reference number of the supplier or only the VAT identification number.
Article 241 
For the purposes of this Chapter, ‘storage of an invoice by electronic means’ shall mean storage of data using electronic equipment for processing (including digital compression) and storage, and employing wire, radio, optical or other electromagnetic means.
Article 242 
Every taxable person shall keep accounts in sufficient detail for VAT to be applied and its application checked by the tax authorities.
Article 243 
1. Every taxable person shall keep a register of the goods dispatched or transported, by that person or on his behalf, to a destination outside the territory of the Member State of departure but within the Community for the purposes of transactions consisting in work on those goods or their temporary use as referred to in points (f), (g) and (h) of Article 17(2). 2. Every taxable person shall keep accounts in sufficient detail to enable the identification of goods dispatched to him from another Member State, by or on behalf of a taxable person identified for VAT purposes in that other Member State, and used for services consisting in valuations of those goods or work on those goods as referred to in point (c) of Article 52.
Amendment rationale: CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL 1. Article 97(1) of Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax[1] (hereinafter "the VAT Directive") provides that from 1 January 2006 until 31 December 2010 the standard rate may not be less than 15% and Article 97(2) stipulates that the Council shall decide, in accordance with Article 93 of the Treaty, on the level of the standard rate of value added tax (VAT) to be applied after 31 December 2010. 2. This provision was based on Article 93 of the Treaty establishing the European Community (the EC Treaty). As from 1 December 2009, Article 93 of the EC Treaty is replaced by Article 113 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU). Article 113 TFEU stipulates that the Council shall, acting unanimously in accordance with a special legislative procedure and after consulting the European Parliament and the Economic and Social Committee, adopt provisions for the harmonisation of legislation concerning turnover taxes to the extent that such harmonisation is necessary to ensure the establishment and functioning of the internal market and to avoid distortion of competition. 3. With a view to establishing the internal market on 1 January 1993, the Commission presented proposals intended to set up a definitive system of tax harmonisation. 4. However, when it became clear that it would be impossible to adopt the Commission's proposals before 1 January 1993, the Council decided to adopt a transitional system. With regard to VAT rates, it adopted Directive 92/77/EEC[2]. 5. That Directive introduced a system of minimum rates. It stipulated that from 1 January 1993 to 31 December 1996, the standard rate could not be set lower than 15%. This provision has been extended four times and applies until 31 December 2010. 6. To maintain the degree of harmonisation of rates already achieved, the Commission has twice presented proposals providing for a standard rate band with a minimum rate of 15% and a maximum rate of 25%[3]. The band was derived from the rates applied in practice in Member States, where standard rates have always varied between 15% and 25%. 7. In both cases, the proposals to approximate rates were amended by the Council,[4] which kept only the principle of a minimum rate, referring to a 15% minimum rate comparable to the system introduced by the 1992 Directive. 8. However, these Council Directives were adopted with a statement for the Council minutes mentioning Member States' efforts to avoid widening the 10 percentage point span between the lowest and highest rates applied. This demonstrates the continued concerns of Member States about distortions between high and low rate countries and the possible budgetary effects of different levels of VAT rates. In the light of the current economic crisis, there are further arguments for keeping a minimum standard rate to be laid down in the VAT Directive. 9. Despite various improvements to the common VAT system based on the Commission's pragmatic, phased VAT strategy launched in 2000[5] and updated in 2003[6], the VAT system continues to suffer from shortcomings and high administrative burdens. This means it needs to be fundamentally reassessed. New economic realities, technological processes, fraud patterns etc. also give rise to new challenges. That is why the Commission plans to publish a consultative green paper soon on a new VAT strategy. This will launch a consultation on future tax harmonisation. Only in the light of the outcome of that process can an appropriate decision be taken on the level of standard rates of VAT in the EU. 10. Moreover, recent modifications to the VAT Directive[7] have favoured taxation at the place of consumption, as this results in fewer possibilities for cross-border transactions seeking lower VAT rates, leading to distortions of competition. However, it remains important to prevent growing divergence in standard VAT rates applied by Member States from leading to structural imbalances in the EU and distortions of competition in some sectors of activity. To this end, it is common practice in the field of indirect taxes, both for excise duties and VAT, to set minimum rates. Although no maximum rate is proposed, the span between the standard rates applied in the Member States can – as is currently the case – be expected to ensure the proper functioning of the internal market while acknowledging the possible need for new budgetary resources from consumption taxes. 11. The accession of new Member States on 1 May 2004 and on 1 January 2007 did not alter the situation regarding the standard rate. That still ranges from 15% to 25% in 27 Member States. Two Member States (Cyprus and Luxembourg) apply a 15% rate and three a 25% rate (Denmark, Hungary and Sweden). 12. In these circumstances, it therefore appears appropriate to maintain the principle of a minimum standard VAT rate of 15%, and to propose that the current arrangements be extended. 13. To give businesses necessary legal certainty, and allow further evaluation of the appropriate level of the standard VAT rate at EU level, it seems appropriate to extend the provision for another five years, while the Commission reflects on a new VAT strategy and re-examines the standard VAT rate appropriate for a common approach. 14. Since the application of the minimum standard rate under Article 97(1) of Directive 2006/112/EC expires on 31 December 2010, the object of this proposal is to enable the Council to extend the period during which this rate applies. The minimum standard VAT rate is therefore set at 15% for five years from 1 January 2011 to 31 December 2015. The Commission would also expect the Council to renew the statement for the minutes agreed earlier on the span between the lowest and highest rates applied for that same period.
Revised version (Article 243 ):
1. Every taxable person shall keep a register of the goods dispatched or transported by him, or on his behalf, to a destination outside the territory of the Member State of departure but within the Community for the purposes of transactions consisting in valuations of those goods or work on them or their temporary use as referred to in points (f), (g) and (h) of Article 17(2). 2. Every taxable person shall keep accounts in sufficient detail to enable the identification of goods dispatched to him from another Member State, by or on behalf of a taxable person identified for VAT purposes in that other Member State, and used for services consisting in valuations of those goods or work on those goods.
Article 244 
Every taxable person shall ensure that copies of the invoices issued by himself, or by his customer or, in his name and on his behalf, by a third party, and all the invoices which he has received, are stored.
Article 245 
1. For the purposes of this Directive, the taxable person may decide the place of storage of all invoices provided that he makes the invoices or information stored in accordance with Article 244 available to the competent authorities without undue delay whenever they so request. 2. Member States may require taxable persons established in their territory to notify them of the place of storage, if it is outside their territory. Member States may also require taxable persons established in their territory to store within that territory invoices issued by themselves or by their customers or, in their name and on their behalf, by a third party, as well as all the invoices that they have received, when the storage is not by electronic means guaranteeing full on-line access to the data concerned.
Article 246 
The authenticity of the origin and the integrity of the content of the invoices stored, as well as their legibility, must be guaranteed throughout the storage period. In respect of the invoices referred to in the second subparagraph of Article 233(1), the details they contain may not be altered and must remain legible throughout the storage period.
Amendment rationale: CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL 1. Article 97(1) of Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax[1] (hereinafter "the VAT Directive") provides that from 1 January 2006 until 31 December 2010 the standard rate may not be less than 15% and Article 97(2) stipulates that the Council shall decide, in accordance with Article 93 of the Treaty, on the level of the standard rate of value added tax (VAT) to be applied after 31 December 2010. 2. This provision was based on Article 93 of the Treaty establishing the European Community (the EC Treaty). As from 1 December 2009, Article 93 of the EC Treaty is replaced by Article 113 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU). Article 113 TFEU stipulates that the Council shall, acting unanimously in accordance with a special legislative procedure and after consulting the European Parliament and the Economic and Social Committee, adopt provisions for the harmonisation of legislation concerning turnover taxes to the extent that such harmonisation is necessary to ensure the establishment and functioning of the internal market and to avoid distortion of competition. 3. With a view to establishing the internal market on 1 January 1993, the Commission presented proposals intended to set up a definitive system of tax harmonisation. 4. However, when it became clear that it would be impossible to adopt the Commission's proposals before 1 January 1993, the Council decided to adopt a transitional system. With regard to VAT rates, it adopted Directive 92/77/EEC[2]. 5. That Directive introduced a system of minimum rates. It stipulated that from 1 January 1993 to 31 December 1996, the standard rate could not be set lower than 15%. This provision has been extended four times and applies until 31 December 2010. 6. To maintain the degree of harmonisation of rates already achieved, the Commission has twice presented proposals providing for a standard rate band with a minimum rate of 15% and a maximum rate of 25%[3]. The band was derived from the rates applied in practice in Member States, where standard rates have always varied between 15% and 25%. 7. In both cases, the proposals to approximate rates were amended by the Council,[4] which kept only the principle of a minimum rate, referring to a 15% minimum rate comparable to the system introduced by the 1992 Directive. 8. However, these Council Directives were adopted with a statement for the Council minutes mentioning Member States' efforts to avoid widening the 10 percentage point span between the lowest and highest rates applied. This demonstrates the continued concerns of Member States about distortions between high and low rate countries and the possible budgetary effects of different levels of VAT rates. In the light of the current economic crisis, there are further arguments for keeping a minimum standard rate to be laid down in the VAT Directive. 9. Despite various improvements to the common VAT system based on the Commission's pragmatic, phased VAT strategy launched in 2000[5] and updated in 2003[6], the VAT system continues to suffer from shortcomings and high administrative burdens. This means it needs to be fundamentally reassessed. New economic realities, technological processes, fraud patterns etc. also give rise to new challenges. That is why the Commission plans to publish a consultative green paper soon on a new VAT strategy. This will launch a consultation on future tax harmonisation. Only in the light of the outcome of that process can an appropriate decision be taken on the level of standard rates of VAT in the EU. 10. Moreover, recent modifications to the VAT Directive[7] have favoured taxation at the place of consumption, as this results in fewer possibilities for cross-border transactions seeking lower VAT rates, leading to distortions of competition. However, it remains important to prevent growing divergence in standard VAT rates applied by Member States from leading to structural imbalances in the EU and distortions of competition in some sectors of activity. To this end, it is common practice in the field of indirect taxes, both for excise duties and VAT, to set minimum rates. Although no maximum rate is proposed, the span between the standard rates applied in the Member States can – as is currently the case – be expected to ensure the proper functioning of the internal market while acknowledging the possible need for new budgetary resources from consumption taxes. 11. The accession of new Member States on 1 May 2004 and on 1 January 2007 did not alter the situation regarding the standard rate. That still ranges from 15% to 25% in 27 Member States. Two Member States (Cyprus and Luxembourg) apply a 15% rate and three a 25% rate (Denmark, Hungary and Sweden). 12. In these circumstances, it therefore appears appropriate to maintain the principle of a minimum standard VAT rate of 15%, and to propose that the current arrangements be extended. 13. To give businesses necessary legal certainty, and allow further evaluation of the appropriate level of the standard VAT rate at EU level, it seems appropriate to extend the provision for another five years, while the Commission reflects on a new VAT strategy and re-examines the standard VAT rate appropriate for a common approach. 14. Since the application of the minimum standard rate under Article 97(1) of Directive 2006/112/EC expires on 31 December 2010, the object of this proposal is to enable the Council to extend the period during which this rate applies. The minimum standard VAT rate is therefore set at 15% for five years from 1 January 2011 to 31 December 2015. The Commission would also expect the Council to renew the statement for the minutes agreed earlier on the span between the lowest and highest rates applied for that same period.
Article 247 
1. Each Member State shall determine the period throughout which taxable persons must ensure the storage of invoices relating to the supply of goods or services in its territory and invoices received by taxable persons established in its territory. 2. In order to ensure that the conditions laid down in Article 246 are met, the Member State referred to in paragraph 1 may require that invoices be stored in the original form in which they were sent or made available, whether paper or electronic. Additionally, in the case of invoices stored by electronic means, the Member State may require that the data guaranteeing the authenticity of the origin of the invoices and the integrity of their content, as provided for in the first paragraph of Article 246, also be stored. 3. The Member State referred to in paragraph 1 may lay down specific conditions prohibiting or restricting the storage of invoices in a country with which no legal instrument exists relating to mutual assistance similar in scope to that provided for in Directive 76/308/EEC and Regulation (EC) No 1798/2003 or to the right referred to in Article 249 to access by electronic means, to download and to use.
Amendment rationale: CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL 1. Article 97(1) of Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax[1] (hereinafter "the VAT Directive") provides that from 1 January 2006 until 31 December 2010 the standard rate may not be less than 15% and Article 97(2) stipulates that the Council shall decide, in accordance with Article 93 of the Treaty, on the level of the standard rate of value added tax (VAT) to be applied after 31 December 2010. 2. This provision was based on Article 93 of the Treaty establishing the European Community (the EC Treaty). As from 1 December 2009, Article 93 of the EC Treaty is replaced by Article 113 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU). Article 113 TFEU stipulates that the Council shall, acting unanimously in accordance with a special legislative procedure and after consulting the European Parliament and the Economic and Social Committee, adopt provisions for the harmonisation of legislation concerning turnover taxes to the extent that such harmonisation is necessary to ensure the establishment and functioning of the internal market and to avoid distortion of competition. 3. With a view to establishing the internal market on 1 January 1993, the Commission presented proposals intended to set up a definitive system of tax harmonisation. 4. However, when it became clear that it would be impossible to adopt the Commission's proposals before 1 January 1993, the Council decided to adopt a transitional system. With regard to VAT rates, it adopted Directive 92/77/EEC[2]. 5. That Directive introduced a system of minimum rates. It stipulated that from 1 January 1993 to 31 December 1996, the standard rate could not be set lower than 15%. This provision has been extended four times and applies until 31 December 2010. 6. To maintain the degree of harmonisation of rates already achieved, the Commission has twice presented proposals providing for a standard rate band with a minimum rate of 15% and a maximum rate of 25%[3]. The band was derived from the rates applied in practice in Member States, where standard rates have always varied between 15% and 25%. 7. In both cases, the proposals to approximate rates were amended by the Council,[4] which kept only the principle of a minimum rate, referring to a 15% minimum rate comparable to the system introduced by the 1992 Directive. 8. However, these Council Directives were adopted with a statement for the Council minutes mentioning Member States' efforts to avoid widening the 10 percentage point span between the lowest and highest rates applied. This demonstrates the continued concerns of Member States about distortions between high and low rate countries and the possible budgetary effects of different levels of VAT rates. In the light of the current economic crisis, there are further arguments for keeping a minimum standard rate to be laid down in the VAT Directive. 9. Despite various improvements to the common VAT system based on the Commission's pragmatic, phased VAT strategy launched in 2000[5] and updated in 2003[6], the VAT system continues to suffer from shortcomings and high administrative burdens. This means it needs to be fundamentally reassessed. New economic realities, technological processes, fraud patterns etc. also give rise to new challenges. That is why the Commission plans to publish a consultative green paper soon on a new VAT strategy. This will launch a consultation on future tax harmonisation. Only in the light of the outcome of that process can an appropriate decision be taken on the level of standard rates of VAT in the EU. 10. Moreover, recent modifications to the VAT Directive[7] have favoured taxation at the place of consumption, as this results in fewer possibilities for cross-border transactions seeking lower VAT rates, leading to distortions of competition. However, it remains important to prevent growing divergence in standard VAT rates applied by Member States from leading to structural imbalances in the EU and distortions of competition in some sectors of activity. To this end, it is common practice in the field of indirect taxes, both for excise duties and VAT, to set minimum rates. Although no maximum rate is proposed, the span between the standard rates applied in the Member States can – as is currently the case – be expected to ensure the proper functioning of the internal market while acknowledging the possible need for new budgetary resources from consumption taxes. 11. The accession of new Member States on 1 May 2004 and on 1 January 2007 did not alter the situation regarding the standard rate. That still ranges from 15% to 25% in 27 Member States. Two Member States (Cyprus and Luxembourg) apply a 15% rate and three a 25% rate (Denmark, Hungary and Sweden). 12. In these circumstances, it therefore appears appropriate to maintain the principle of a minimum standard VAT rate of 15%, and to propose that the current arrangements be extended. 13. To give businesses necessary legal certainty, and allow further evaluation of the appropriate level of the standard VAT rate at EU level, it seems appropriate to extend the provision for another five years, while the Commission reflects on a new VAT strategy and re-examines the standard VAT rate appropriate for a common approach. 14. Since the application of the minimum standard rate under Article 97(1) of Directive 2006/112/EC expires on 31 December 2010, the object of this proposal is to enable the Council to extend the period during which this rate applies. The minimum standard VAT rate is therefore set at 15% for five years from 1 January 2011 to 31 December 2015. The Commission would also expect the Council to renew the statement for the minutes agreed earlier on the span between the lowest and highest rates applied for that same period.
Revised version (Article 247 ):
1. Each Member State shall determine the period throughout which taxable persons must ensure the storage of invoices relating to the supply of goods or services in its territory and invoices received by taxable persons established in its territory. 2. In order to ensure that the requirements laid down in Article 233 are met, the Member State referred to in paragraph 1 may require that invoices be stored in the original form in which they were sent or made available, whether paper or electronic. Additionally, in the case of invoices stored by electronic means, the Member State may require that the data guaranteeing the authenticity of the origin of the invoices and the integrity of their content, as provided for in Article 233, also be stored by electronic means. 3. The Member State referred to in paragraph 1 may lay down specific conditions prohibiting or restricting the storage of invoices in a country with which no legal instrument exists relating to mutual assistance similar in scope to that provided for in Directive 2010/24/EU and Regulation (EC) No 1798/2003 or to the right referred to in Article 249 to access by electronic means, to download and to use.
Article 248 
Member States may, subject to conditions which they lay down, require the storage of invoices received by non-taxable persons.
Article 249 
Where a taxable person stores invoices which he issues or receives by electronic means guaranteeing on-line access to the data and where the place of storage is in a Member State other than that in which he is established, the competent authorities in the Member State in which he is established shall, for the purposes of this Directive, have the right to access those invoices by electronic means, to download and to use them, within the limits set by the rules of the Member State in which the taxable person is established and in so far as those authorities require for control purposes.
Amendment rationale: CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL 1. Article 97(1) of Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax[1] (hereinafter "the VAT Directive") provides that from 1 January 2006 until 31 December 2010 the standard rate may not be less than 15% and Article 97(2) stipulates that the Council shall decide, in accordance with Article 93 of the Treaty, on the level of the standard rate of value added tax (VAT) to be applied after 31 December 2010. 2. This provision was based on Article 93 of the Treaty establishing the European Community (the EC Treaty). As from 1 December 2009, Article 93 of the EC Treaty is replaced by Article 113 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU). Article 113 TFEU stipulates that the Council shall, acting unanimously in accordance with a special legislative procedure and after consulting the European Parliament and the Economic and Social Committee, adopt provisions for the harmonisation of legislation concerning turnover taxes to the extent that such harmonisation is necessary to ensure the establishment and functioning of the internal market and to avoid distortion of competition. 3. With a view to establishing the internal market on 1 January 1993, the Commission presented proposals intended to set up a definitive system of tax harmonisation. 4. However, when it became clear that it would be impossible to adopt the Commission's proposals before 1 January 1993, the Council decided to adopt a transitional system. With regard to VAT rates, it adopted Directive 92/77/EEC[2]. 5. That Directive introduced a system of minimum rates. It stipulated that from 1 January 1993 to 31 December 1996, the standard rate could not be set lower than 15%. This provision has been extended four times and applies until 31 December 2010. 6. To maintain the degree of harmonisation of rates already achieved, the Commission has twice presented proposals providing for a standard rate band with a minimum rate of 15% and a maximum rate of 25%[3]. The band was derived from the rates applied in practice in Member States, where standard rates have always varied between 15% and 25%. 7. In both cases, the proposals to approximate rates were amended by the Council,[4] which kept only the principle of a minimum rate, referring to a 15% minimum rate comparable to the system introduced by the 1992 Directive. 8. However, these Council Directives were adopted with a statement for the Council minutes mentioning Member States' efforts to avoid widening the 10 percentage point span between the lowest and highest rates applied. This demonstrates the continued concerns of Member States about distortions between high and low rate countries and the possible budgetary effects of different levels of VAT rates. In the light of the current economic crisis, there are further arguments for keeping a minimum standard rate to be laid down in the VAT Directive. 9. Despite various improvements to the common VAT system based on the Commission's pragmatic, phased VAT strategy launched in 2000[5] and updated in 2003[6], the VAT system continues to suffer from shortcomings and high administrative burdens. This means it needs to be fundamentally reassessed. New economic realities, technological processes, fraud patterns etc. also give rise to new challenges. That is why the Commission plans to publish a consultative green paper soon on a new VAT strategy. This will launch a consultation on future tax harmonisation. Only in the light of the outcome of that process can an appropriate decision be taken on the level of standard rates of VAT in the EU. 10. Moreover, recent modifications to the VAT Directive[7] have favoured taxation at the place of consumption, as this results in fewer possibilities for cross-border transactions seeking lower VAT rates, leading to distortions of competition. However, it remains important to prevent growing divergence in standard VAT rates applied by Member States from leading to structural imbalances in the EU and distortions of competition in some sectors of activity. To this end, it is common practice in the field of indirect taxes, both for excise duties and VAT, to set minimum rates. Although no maximum rate is proposed, the span between the standard rates applied in the Member States can – as is currently the case – be expected to ensure the proper functioning of the internal market while acknowledging the possible need for new budgetary resources from consumption taxes. 11. The accession of new Member States on 1 May 2004 and on 1 January 2007 did not alter the situation regarding the standard rate. That still ranges from 15% to 25% in 27 Member States. Two Member States (Cyprus and Luxembourg) apply a 15% rate and three a 25% rate (Denmark, Hungary and Sweden). 12. In these circumstances, it therefore appears appropriate to maintain the principle of a minimum standard VAT rate of 15%, and to propose that the current arrangements be extended. 13. To give businesses necessary legal certainty, and allow further evaluation of the appropriate level of the standard VAT rate at EU level, it seems appropriate to extend the provision for another five years, while the Commission reflects on a new VAT strategy and re-examines the standard VAT rate appropriate for a common approach. 14. Since the application of the minimum standard rate under Article 97(1) of Directive 2006/112/EC expires on 31 December 2010, the object of this proposal is to enable the Council to extend the period during which this rate applies. The minimum standard VAT rate is therefore set at 15% for five years from 1 January 2011 to 31 December 2015. The Commission would also expect the Council to renew the statement for the minutes agreed earlier on the span between the lowest and highest rates applied for that same period.
Revised version (Article 249 ):
For control purposes, where a taxable person stores, by electronic means guaranteeing online access to the data concerned, invoices which he issues or receives, the competent authorities of the Member State in which he is established and, where the VAT is due in another Member State, the competent authorities of that Member State, shall have the right to access, download and use those invoices.
Article 250 
1. Every taxable person shall submit a VAT return setting out all the information needed to calculate the tax that has become chargeable and the deductions to be made including, in so far as is necessary for the establishment of the basis of assessment, the total value of the transactions relating to such tax and deductions and the value of any exempt transactions. 2. Member States shall allow, and may require, the VAT return referred to in paragraph 1 to be submitted by electronic means, in accordance with conditions which they lay down.
Article 251 
In addition to the information referred to in Article 250, the VAT return covering a given tax period shall show the following: (a) the total value, exclusive of VAT, of the supplies of goods referred to in Article 138 in respect of which VAT has become chargeable during this tax period; (b) the total value, exclusive of VAT, of the supplies of goods referred to in Articles 33 and 36 carried out within the territory of another Member State, in respect of which VAT has become chargeable during this tax period, where the place where dispatch or transport of the goods began is situated in the Member State in which the return must be submitted; (c) the total value, exclusive of VAT, of the intra-Community acquisitions of goods, or transactions treated as such, pursuant to Articles 21 or 22, made in the Member State in which the return must be submitted and in respect of which VAT has become chargeable during this tax period; (d) the total value, exclusive of VAT, of the supplies of goods referred to in Articles 33 and 36 carried out in the Member State in which the return must be submitted and in respect of which VAT has become chargeable during this tax period, where the place where dispatch or transport of the goods began is situated within the territory of another Member State; (e) the total value, exclusive of VAT, of the supplies of goods carried out in the Member State in which the return must be submitted and in respect of which the taxable person has been designated, in accordance with Article 197, as liable for payment of VAT and in respect of which VAT has become chargeable during this tax period.
Article 252 
1. The VAT return shall be submitted by a deadline to be determined by Member States. That deadline may not be more than two months after the end of each tax period. 2. The tax period shall be set by each Member State at one month, two months or three months. Member States may, however, set different tax periods provided that those periods do not exceed one year.
Article 253 
Sweden may apply a simplified procedure for small and medium-sized enterprises, whereby taxable persons carrying out only transactions taxable at national level may submit VAT returns three months after the end of the annual direct tax period.
Article 254 
In the case of supplies of new means of transport carried out in accordance with the conditions specified in Article 138(2)(a) by a taxable person identified for VAT purposes for a customer not identified for VAT purposes, or by a taxable person as defined in Article 9(2), Member States shall take the measures necessary to ensure that the vendor communicates all the information needed for VAT to be applied and its application checked by the tax authorities.
Article 255 
Where Member States designate the customer of investment gold as the person liable for payment of VAT pursuant to Article 198(1) or if, in the case of gold material, semi-manufactured products or investment gold as defined in Article 344(1), they exercise the option provided for in Article 198(2) of designating the customer as the person liable for payment of VAT, they shall take the measures necessary to ensure that he complies with the obligations relating to submission of a VAT return set out in this Chapter.
Article 256 
Member States shall take the measures necessary to ensure that persons who are regarded as liable for payment of VAT in the stead of a taxable person not established within their territory, in accordance with Articles 194 to 197 and Article 204, comply with the obligations relating to submission of a VAT return, as laid down in this Chapter.
Article 257 
Member States shall take the measures necessary to ensure that non-taxable legal persons who are liable for payment of VAT due in respect of intra-Community acquisitions of goods, as referred to in Article 2(1)(b)(i), comply with the obligations relating to submission of a VAT return, as laid down in this Chapter.
Article 258 
Member States shall lay down detailed rules for the submission of VAT returns in respect of intra-Community acquisitions of new means of transport, as referred to in Article 2(1)(b)(ii), and intra-Community acquisitions of products subject to excise duty, as referred to in Article 2(1)(b)(iii).
Article 259 
Member States may require persons who make intra-Community acquisitions of new means of transport as referred to in Article 2(1)(b)(ii), to provide, when submitting the VAT return, all the information needed for VAT to be applied and its application checked by the tax authorities.
Article 260 
Member States shall lay down detailed rules for the submission of VAT returns in respect of the importation of goods.
Article 261 
1. Member States may require the taxable person to submit a return showing all the particulars specified in Articles 250 and 251 in respect of all transactions carried out in the preceding year. That return shall provide all the information necessary for any adjustments. 2. Member States shall allow, and may require, the return referred to in paragraph 1 to be submitted by electronic means, in accordance with conditions which they lay down.
Article 262 
Every taxable person identified for VAT purposes shall submit a recapitulative statement of the following: (a) the acquirers identified for VAT purposes to whom he has supplied goods in accordance with the conditions specified in Article 138(1) and (2)(c); (b) the persons identified for VAT purposes to whom he has supplied goods which were supplied to him by way of intra-Community acquisitions referred to in Article 42; (c) the taxable persons, and the non-taxable legal persons identified for VAT purposes, to whom he has supplied services, other than services that are exempted from VAT in the Member State where the transaction is taxable, and for which the recipient is liable to pay the tax pursuant to Article 196.
Amendment rationale: CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL Reasons for and objectives of the proposal Value added tax (VAT) is a general consumption tax borne ultimately by the final consumer but collected by businesses supplying goods or services. The scope of VAT, as set out in Article 2 of the VAT Directive 1 , is very broad, covering any supply of goods and services for consideration by a taxable person within the territory of a Member State and any importation of goods into the European Union (EU). One of the aims of the VAT Directive was to draw up a common list of VAT exemptions so that EU own resources could be collected in a uniform manner in all Member States 2 . That is why the exemption of any transaction from VAT requires a specific provision in the VAT Directive. The VAT Directive does not provide for any general exemption for the supply of goods or services for security and defence purposes. In principle, goods or services supplied to, or goods imported by, armed forces will therefore carry VAT 3 . The cost of VAT is reflected in an increase in the revenues that the tax generates for the state treasury (as public bodies, the military forces are unable to recuperate such VAT), which in turn feed into the budget that finances activities such as national defence. The Directive does provide for an exemption for supplies to the armed forces of any state party to the North Atlantic Treaty that are taking part in a common defence effort outside their own state. This exemption was established to address situations in which the circle of revenue and expenditure flow is broken, because VAT on such supplies would normally constitute revenue for the state in which the armed forces are located, rather than their own. The Excise Directive 4 provides for a similar exemption from excise duty 5 for movements of excise goods to the armed forces of any North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO) member. While NATO defence effort has been covered by the VAT Directive since 1977 6 and the Excise Directive since 1993, neither of the exemptions covers supplies linked to the common defence effort within the Union framework, because there is as yet no common Union defence policy. However, the common security and defence policy (CSDP), which was established as the European security and defence policy (ESDP) in 2000 7 , is a key instrument for external action and includes the progressive framing of a common Union defence policy 8 . The Lisbon Treaty, which came into force in December 2009, was a milestone in the development of the CSDP. The Treaty on European Union (TEU), as amended by the Lisbon Treaty, includes a mutual assistance clause 9 and allowed Member States to strengthen their cooperation in military matters through ‘permanent structured cooperation’ (PESCO) 10 . The Lisbon Treaty also established the European External Action Service (EEAS), which assists the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy in all her responsibilities, including the CSDP. The fact that the High Representative is also one of the Vice-Presidents of the Commission facilitates the bringing together of all necessary EU assets and the application of a comprehensive approach to EU crisis management. The EU Military Committee (EUMC), which was set up in 2001 11 , is the Council’s highest military body. It directs all military activities within the EU framework and advises on the planning and execution of military missions and operations under the CSDP, and on the development of military capabilities. Also established in 2001 12 and working under the military direction of the EUMC, the European Union Military Staff (EUMS) is the source of the EU’s military expertise 13 . It provides early warning, situation assessment and strategic planning for missions and tasks referred to in Articles 42(1) and 43(1) TEU. It also contributes to the elaboration, assessment and review of the capability goals. In June 2016, the global strategy for the European Union’s foreign and security policy (EUGS) 14 laid the ground for developing CSDP further towards three core priorities: responding to external conflicts and crises, building the capabilities of partners and protecting the Union and its citizens. In December 2017 15 , the European Council invited the High Representative, the Commission and the Member States to bring forward work on military mobility, both under PESCO and in the context of EU NATO cooperation. In March 2018, as a follow-up to their November 2017 Joint Communication on improving military mobility in the EU 16 , the Commission and the High Representative presented a Joint Communication on the action plan on military mobility 17 . The action plan recognises the need for equal treatment of defence efforts with a view to reducing administrative burden and thus delays and costs in military mobility, and providing Member States with an incentive to cooperate 18 . It requires the Commission to assess the feasibility of aligning the VAT treatment of defence efforts in the EU framework and under the NATO umbrella. On 19 November 2018, the Council concluded on Security and Defence in the context of the EUGS 19 . The Council welcomed the substantive progress made in the area of security and defence during the previous two years and stressed the importance of keeping the momentum through the continued engagement of the Member States and EU institutions. In particular, the Council welcomed the progress in the implementation of PESCO and the ongoing implementation of efforts to improve the mobility of military personnel, materiel and equipment for routine activities and during crisis and conflict, within and beyond the EU. In line with the action plan and the Council conclusions, the objective of this proposal is to align the VAT treatment of defence efforts in the EU and NATO frameworks as far as is feasible. The proposal has to acknowledge that, while there is a collective defence effort under the North Atlantic Treaty, no common Union defence policy exists as yet. The arrangements for exemptions from excise duties, as provided for in the Excise Directive, should be aligned in a similar way.
Revised version (Article 262 ):
1. Every taxable person identified for VAT purposes shall submit a recapitulative statement of the following: (b) the persons identified for VAT purposes to whom he has supplied goods which were supplied to him by way of intra-Community acquisition of goods referred to in Article 42; (c) the taxable persons, and the non-taxable legal persons identified for VAT purposes, to whom he has supplied services other than services that are exempted from VAT in the Member State where the transaction is taxable and for which the recipient is liable to pay the tax pursuant to Article 196. 2. In addition to the information referred to in paragraph 1, every taxable person shall submit information about the VAT identification number of the taxable persons for whom goods, dispatched or transported under call-off stock arrangements in accordance with the conditions set out in Article 17a, are intended and about any change in the submitted information.
Article 263 
1. The recapitulative statement shall be drawn up for each calendar month within a period not exceeding one month and in accordance with procedures to be determined by the Member States. 1a. However, Member States, in accordance with the conditions and limits which they may lay down, may allow taxable persons to submit the recapitulative statement for each calendar quarter within a time limit not exceeding one month from the end of the quarter, where the total quarterly amount, excluding VAT, of the supplies of goods as referred to in Articles 264(1)(d) and 265(1)(c) does not exceed either in respect of the quarter concerned or in respect of any of the previous four quarters the sum of EUR 50 000 or its equivalent in national currency. The option provided for in the first subparagraph shall cease to be applicable after the end of the month during which the total value, excluding VAT, of the supplies of goods as referred to in Article 264(1)(d) and 265(1)(c) exceeds, in respect of the current quarter, the sum of EUR 50 000 or its equivalent in national currency. In this case, a recapitulative statement shall be drawn up for the month(s) which has (have) elapsed since the beginning of the quarter, within a time limit not exceeding one month. 1b. Until 31 December 2011, Member States are allowed to set the sum mentioned in paragraph 1a at EUR 100 000 or its equivalent in national currency. 1c. In the case of supplies of services as referred to in Article 264(1)(d), Member States, in accordance with the conditions and limits which they may lay down, may allow taxable persons to submit the recapitulative statement for each calendar quarter within a time limit not exceeding one month from the end of the quarter. Member States may, in particular, require the taxable persons who carry out supplies of both goods and services as referred to in Article 264(1)(d) to submit the recapitulative statement in accordance with the deadline resulting from paragraphs 1 to 1b. 2. Member States shall allow, and may require, the recapitulative statement referred to in paragraph 1 to be submitted by electronic file transfer, in accordance with conditions which they lay down.
Article 264 
1. The recapitulative statement shall set out the following information: (a) the VAT identification number of the taxable person in the Member State in which the recapitulative statement must be submitted and under which he has carried out the supply of goods in accordance with the conditions specified in Article 138(1) and under which he effected taxable supplies of services in accordance with the conditions laid down in Article 44; (b) the VAT identification number of the person acquiring the goods or receiving the services in a Member State other than that in which the recapitulative statement must be submitted and under which the goods or services were supplied to him; (c) the VAT identification number of the taxable person in the Member State in which the recapitulative statement must be submitted and under which he has carried out a transfer to another Member State, as referred to in Article 138(2)(c), and the number by means of which he is identified in the Member State in which the dispatch or transport ended; (d) for each person who acquired goods or received services, the total value of the supplies of goods and the total value of the supplies of services carried out by the taxable person; (e) in respect of supplies of goods consisting in transfers to another Member State, as referred to in Article 138(2)(c), the total value of the supplies, determined in accordance with Article 76; (f) the amounts of adjustments made pursuant to Article 90. 2. The value referred to in paragraph 1(d) shall be declared for the period of submission established in accordance with Article 263(1) to (1c) during which VAT became chargeable. The amounts referred to in paragraph 1(f) shall be declared for the period of submission established in accordance with Article 263(1) to (1c) during which the person acquiring the goods was notified of the adjustment.
Amendment rationale: CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL Reasons for and objectives of the proposal Value added tax (VAT) is a general consumption tax borne ultimately by the final consumer but collected by businesses supplying goods or services. The scope of VAT, as set out in Article 2 of the VAT Directive 1 , is very broad, covering any supply of goods and services for consideration by a taxable person within the territory of a Member State and any importation of goods into the European Union (EU). One of the aims of the VAT Directive was to draw up a common list of VAT exemptions so that EU own resources could be collected in a uniform manner in all Member States 2 . That is why the exemption of any transaction from VAT requires a specific provision in the VAT Directive. The VAT Directive does not provide for any general exemption for the supply of goods or services for security and defence purposes. In principle, goods or services supplied to, or goods imported by, armed forces will therefore carry VAT 3 . The cost of VAT is reflected in an increase in the revenues that the tax generates for the state treasury (as public bodies, the military forces are unable to recuperate such VAT), which in turn feed into the budget that finances activities such as national defence. The Directive does provide for an exemption for supplies to the armed forces of any state party to the North Atlantic Treaty that are taking part in a common defence effort outside their own state. This exemption was established to address situations in which the circle of revenue and expenditure flow is broken, because VAT on such supplies would normally constitute revenue for the state in which the armed forces are located, rather than their own. The Excise Directive 4 provides for a similar exemption from excise duty 5 for movements of excise goods to the armed forces of any North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO) member. While NATO defence effort has been covered by the VAT Directive since 1977 6 and the Excise Directive since 1993, neither of the exemptions covers supplies linked to the common defence effort within the Union framework, because there is as yet no common Union defence policy. However, the common security and defence policy (CSDP), which was established as the European security and defence policy (ESDP) in 2000 7 , is a key instrument for external action and includes the progressive framing of a common Union defence policy 8 . The Lisbon Treaty, which came into force in December 2009, was a milestone in the development of the CSDP. The Treaty on European Union (TEU), as amended by the Lisbon Treaty, includes a mutual assistance clause 9 and allowed Member States to strengthen their cooperation in military matters through ‘permanent structured cooperation’ (PESCO) 10 . The Lisbon Treaty also established the European External Action Service (EEAS), which assists the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy in all her responsibilities, including the CSDP. The fact that the High Representative is also one of the Vice-Presidents of the Commission facilitates the bringing together of all necessary EU assets and the application of a comprehensive approach to EU crisis management. The EU Military Committee (EUMC), which was set up in 2001 11 , is the Council’s highest military body. It directs all military activities within the EU framework and advises on the planning and execution of military missions and operations under the CSDP, and on the development of military capabilities. Also established in 2001 12 and working under the military direction of the EUMC, the European Union Military Staff (EUMS) is the source of the EU’s military expertise 13 . It provides early warning, situation assessment and strategic planning for missions and tasks referred to in Articles 42(1) and 43(1) TEU. It also contributes to the elaboration, assessment and review of the capability goals. In June 2016, the global strategy for the European Union’s foreign and security policy (EUGS) 14 laid the ground for developing CSDP further towards three core priorities: responding to external conflicts and crises, building the capabilities of partners and protecting the Union and its citizens. In December 2017 15 , the European Council invited the High Representative, the Commission and the Member States to bring forward work on military mobility, both under PESCO and in the context of EU NATO cooperation. In March 2018, as a follow-up to their November 2017 Joint Communication on improving military mobility in the EU 16 , the Commission and the High Representative presented a Joint Communication on the action plan on military mobility 17 . The action plan recognises the need for equal treatment of defence efforts with a view to reducing administrative burden and thus delays and costs in military mobility, and providing Member States with an incentive to cooperate 18 . It requires the Commission to assess the feasibility of aligning the VAT treatment of defence efforts in the EU framework and under the NATO umbrella. On 19 November 2018, the Council concluded on Security and Defence in the context of the EUGS 19 . The Council welcomed the substantive progress made in the area of security and defence during the previous two years and stressed the importance of keeping the momentum through the continued engagement of the Member States and EU institutions. In particular, the Council welcomed the progress in the implementation of PESCO and the ongoing implementation of efforts to improve the mobility of military personnel, materiel and equipment for routine activities and during crisis and conflict, within and beyond the EU. In line with the action plan and the Council conclusions, the objective of this proposal is to align the VAT treatment of defence efforts in the EU and NATO frameworks as far as is feasible. The proposal has to acknowledge that, while there is a collective defence effort under the North Atlantic Treaty, no common Union defence policy exists as yet. The arrangements for exemptions from excise duties, as provided for in the Excise Directive, should be aligned in a similar way.
Revised version (Article 264 ):
1. The recapitulative statement shall set out the following information: (a) the VAT identification number of the taxable person in the Member State in which the recapitulative statement must be submitted and under which he has carried out the supply of goods in accordance with the conditions specified in Article 138(1) and under which he effected taxable supplies of services in accordance with the conditions laid down in Article 44; (b) the VAT identification number of the person acquiring the goods or receiving the services in a Member State other than that in which the recapitulative statement must be submitted and under which the goods or services were supplied to him; the VAT identification number of the taxable person in the Member State in which the recapitulative statement must be submitted and under which he has carried out a transfer to another Member State, as referred to in Article 138(2)(c), and the number by means of which he is identified in the Member State in which the dispatch or transport ended; (d) for each person who acquired goods or received services, the total value of the supplies of goods and the total value of the supplies of services carried out by the taxable person; in respect of supplies of goods consisting in transfers to another Member State, as referred to in Article 138(2)(c), the total value of the supplies, determined in accordance with Article 76; (f) the amounts of adjustments made pursuant to Article 90. 2. The value referred to in paragraph 1(d) shall be declared for the period of submission established in accordance with Article 263(1) to (1c) during which VAT became chargeable. The amounts referred to in paragraph 1(f) shall be declared for the period of submission established in accordance with Article 263(1) to (1c) during which the person acquiring the goods was notified of the adjustment.
Article 265 
1. In the case of intra-Community acquisitions of goods, as referred to in Article 42, the taxable person identified for VAT purposes in the Member State which issued him with the VAT identification number under which he made such acquisitions shall set the following information out clearly on the recapitulative statement: (a) his VAT identification number in that Member State and under which he made the acquisition and subsequent supply of goods; (b) the VAT identification number, in the Member State in which dispatch or transport of the goods ended, of the person to whom the subsequent supply was made by the taxable person; (c) for each person to whom the subsequent supply was made, the total value, exclusive of VAT, of the supplies made by the taxable person in the Member State in which dispatch or transport of the goods ended. 2. The value referred to in paragraph 1(c) shall be declared for the period of submission established in accordance with Article 263(1) to (1b) during which VAT became chargeable.
Amendment rationale: CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL Reasons for and objectives of the proposal The purpose of the current proposal for a Directive amending Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax 1 (hereafter the ‘ VAT Directive ’ ) is to prolong: 1) the possibility for Member States to apply the reverse charge mechanism to combat existing fraud in supplies of goods and services included in Article 199a(1) of the VAT Directive and 2) the possibility to use the Quick Reaction Mechanism (QRM) , as set out in Article 199b of the VAT Directive , to combat fraud via the application of the reverse charge mechanism in very specific cases . As a general rule, Article 193 of the VAT Directive stipulates that the taxable person supplying goods or services is liable to pay VAT. As a derogation, the reverse charge mechanism allows to designate the recipient of the supply as the person liable for the payment of VAT. Under this reverse charge mechanism, VAT is not charged by the supplier but accounted for by the customer (a taxable person) in his VAT return. This VAT is then deducted in that same VAT return and, therefore, insofar this person has a full right of deduction, the result is nil. The reverse charge mechanism is used to combat fraud and in particular Missing Trader Intra-Community (MTIC) fraud. This type of fraud occurs when a trader acquires goods, transported or dispatched from another Member State, by means of a supply exempt from VAT, and sells them on including VAT on the invoice to the customer. After having received the VAT amount from the customer such trader disappears before paying the VAT due to the tax authorities. At the same time, the customer acting in good faith can normally deduct the VAT he paid to the supplier through his VAT return. Hence, under the reverse charge mechanism VAT is not effectively paid to the supplier. The reverse charge mechanism based on Article 199a o f the VAT Directive is optional for Member States to apply. It allows them to fight this type of fraud in the pre-defined sensitive areas where it typically occurs 2 on their territory . Once suppliers are obliged to use the reverse charge mechanism for such domestic supplies, t he y cann ot charge VAT on their invoice. They will subsequently not receive the VAT amount from their customer and , as a result , such traders cannot disappear with the amount of VAT received. The QRM of Article 199b is an exceptional measure allowing Member States to quickly introduce , in cases of imperative urgency, a temporary reverse charge mechanism for supplies of goods and services in sectors where sudden and massive fraud occurred and which are not listed in Article 199a of the VAT Directive. This procedure is exceptional and extremely quick as the Commission has to react within one month, either with a negative opinion or to confirm in writing to the Member State concerned that it does not object the measure. The Member State may adopt the QRM special measure from the date of receipt of that confirmation. By u sing this mechanism , Member States can bridge the p eriod required for obtaining a ‘ normal ’ derogation under A rticle 395 of the VAT Directive, which can take up to six months . Such a derogation requires a proposal from the Commission and unanimous adoption by Council. Article 199a of the VAT Directive was introduced 3 for the period 2010 until 30 June 2015 and was a first time extended 4 , with amendments, until 31 December 2018. Article 199b of the VAT Directive was introduced 5 for the period 2013 until 31 December 2018. Both Article s 199a and 199b of the VAT Directive were subsequently extended 6 until 30 June 2022 in order to coincide with the initially foreseen date on which the VAT definitive system would enter into force (see more details below) . At the time the application period of Articles 199a and 199b of the VAT Directive would be extended until 30 June 2022 , the Commission presented a r eport on the effects of the mechanisms i ncluded in these articles 7 and concluded, on the basis of contributions of tax administrations and business stakeholders, that the measures in these articles were useful in the fight against fraud. In order to deal with the issue of (MTIC) fraud in a more structural manner , the Commission made a proposal for the introduction of the so-called definitive VAT system, a simpler and fraud-proof system for intra-Union trade of goods 8 . These arrangements, which the Commission proposed to enter into force on 1 July 2022, provide a fundamental response to MTIC fraud. However, the state of play of the ongoing negotiations in the Council indicates that it will not be possible for the definitive VAT system to enter into force on 1 July 2022. In order to allow the negotiations on the definitive system to continue, without putting at risk the available tools in order to combat VAT fraud, it is appropriate to prolong the anti-fraud measures contained in the said articles for another limited period. To extend the application period of Articles 199a and 199b would also allow developing further tools to fight tax evasion. To that end, and in accordance with the Tax Package 9 , the C ommission is prepar ing a proposal in order to modernise the current VAT rules, taking into account the opportunities offered by digital technologies. Under the heading ‘VAT in the digital age’, the Commission will assess VAT reporting obligations, possibly including on Transaction-B ased R eporting (TBR) and a n enhanced system of e-invoicing . This should provide quicker and more detailed information on individual transactions to tax administrations and therefore lower the risk of fraud . Based on such legislative developments, the need to further extend Articles 199a and 199b should be reassessed in the future.
Article 266 
By way of derogation from Articles 264 and 265, Member States may provide that additional information is to be given in recapitulative statements.
Article 267 
Member States shall take the measures necessary to ensure that those persons who, in accordance with Articles 194 and 204, are regarded as liable for payment of VAT, in the stead of a taxable person who is not established in their territory, comply with the obligation to submit a recapitulative statement as provided for in this Chapter.
Article 268 
Member States may require that taxable persons who, in their territory, make intra-Community acquisitions of goods, or transactions treated as such, pursuant to Articles 21 or 22, submit statements giving details of such acquisitions, provided, however, that such statements are not required in respect of a period of less than one month.
Article 269 
Acting unanimously on a proposal from the Commission, the Council may authorise any Member State to introduce the special measures provided for in Articles 270 and 271 to simplify the obligation, laid down in this Chapter, to submit a recapitulative statement. Such measures may not jeopardise the proper monitoring of intra-Community transactions.
Article 270 
By virtue of the authorisation referred to in Article 269, Member States may permit taxable persons to submit annual recapitulative statements indicating the VAT identification numbers, in another Member State, of the persons to whom those taxable persons have supplied goods in accordance with the conditions specified in Article 138(1) and (2)(c), where the taxable persons meet the following three conditions: (a) the total annual value, exclusive of VAT, of their supplies of goods and services does not exceed by more than EUR 35 000, or the equivalent in national currency, the amount of the annual turnover which is used as a reference for application of the exemption for small enterprises provided for in Articles 282 to 292; (b) the total annual value, exclusive of VAT, of supplies of goods carried out by them in accordance with the conditions specified in Article 138 does not exceed EUR 15 000 or the equivalent in national currency; (c) none of the supplies of goods carried out by them in accordance with the conditions specified in Article 138 is a supply of new means of transport.
Amendment rationale: CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL Reasons for and objectives of the proposal Value added tax (VAT) is a general consumption tax borne ultimately by the final consumer but collected by businesses supplying goods or services. The scope of VAT, as set out in Article 2 of the VAT Directive 1 , is very broad, covering any supply of goods and services for consideration by a taxable person within the territory of a Member State and any importation of goods into the European Union (EU). One of the aims of the VAT Directive was to draw up a common list of VAT exemptions so that EU own resources could be collected in a uniform manner in all Member States 2 . That is why the exemption of any transaction from VAT requires a specific provision in the VAT Directive. The VAT Directive does not provide for any general exemption for the supply of goods or services for security and defence purposes. In principle, goods or services supplied to, or goods imported by, armed forces will therefore carry VAT 3 . The cost of VAT is reflected in an increase in the revenues that the tax generates for the state treasury (as public bodies, the military forces are unable to recuperate such VAT), which in turn feed into the budget that finances activities such as national defence. The Directive does provide for an exemption for supplies to the armed forces of any state party to the North Atlantic Treaty that are taking part in a common defence effort outside their own state. This exemption was established to address situations in which the circle of revenue and expenditure flow is broken, because VAT on such supplies would normally constitute revenue for the state in which the armed forces are located, rather than their own. The Excise Directive 4 provides for a similar exemption from excise duty 5 for movements of excise goods to the armed forces of any North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO) member. While NATO defence effort has been covered by the VAT Directive since 1977 6 and the Excise Directive since 1993, neither of the exemptions covers supplies linked to the common defence effort within the Union framework, because there is as yet no common Union defence policy. However, the common security and defence policy (CSDP), which was established as the European security and defence policy (ESDP) in 2000 7 , is a key instrument for external action and includes the progressive framing of a common Union defence policy 8 . The Lisbon Treaty, which came into force in December 2009, was a milestone in the development of the CSDP. The Treaty on European Union (TEU), as amended by the Lisbon Treaty, includes a mutual assistance clause 9 and allowed Member States to strengthen their cooperation in military matters through ‘permanent structured cooperation’ (PESCO) 10 . The Lisbon Treaty also established the European External Action Service (EEAS), which assists the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy in all her responsibilities, including the CSDP. The fact that the High Representative is also one of the Vice-Presidents of the Commission facilitates the bringing together of all necessary EU assets and the application of a comprehensive approach to EU crisis management. The EU Military Committee (EUMC), which was set up in 2001 11 , is the Council’s highest military body. It directs all military activities within the EU framework and advises on the planning and execution of military missions and operations under the CSDP, and on the development of military capabilities. Also established in 2001 12 and working under the military direction of the EUMC, the European Union Military Staff (EUMS) is the source of the EU’s military expertise 13 . It provides early warning, situation assessment and strategic planning for missions and tasks referred to in Articles 42(1) and 43(1) TEU. It also contributes to the elaboration, assessment and review of the capability goals. In June 2016, the global strategy for the European Union’s foreign and security policy (EUGS) 14 laid the ground for developing CSDP further towards three core priorities: responding to external conflicts and crises, building the capabilities of partners and protecting the Union and its citizens. In December 2017 15 , the European Council invited the High Representative, the Commission and the Member States to bring forward work on military mobility, both under PESCO and in the context of EU NATO cooperation. In March 2018, as a follow-up to their November 2017 Joint Communication on improving military mobility in the EU 16 , the Commission and the High Representative presented a Joint Communication on the action plan on military mobility 17 . The action plan recognises the need for equal treatment of defence efforts with a view to reducing administrative burden and thus delays and costs in military mobility, and providing Member States with an incentive to cooperate 18 . It requires the Commission to assess the feasibility of aligning the VAT treatment of defence efforts in the EU framework and under the NATO umbrella. On 19 November 2018, the Council concluded on Security and Defence in the context of the EUGS 19 . The Council welcomed the substantive progress made in the area of security and defence during the previous two years and stressed the importance of keeping the momentum through the continued engagement of the Member States and EU institutions. In particular, the Council welcomed the progress in the implementation of PESCO and the ongoing implementation of efforts to improve the mobility of military personnel, materiel and equipment for routine activities and during crisis and conflict, within and beyond the EU. In line with the action plan and the Council conclusions, the objective of this proposal is to align the VAT treatment of defence efforts in the EU and NATO frameworks as far as is feasible. The proposal has to acknowledge that, while there is a collective defence effort under the North Atlantic Treaty, no common Union defence policy exists as yet. The arrangements for exemptions from excise duties, as provided for in the Excise Directive, should be aligned in a similar way.
Revised version (Article 270 ):
(a) the total annual value, exclusive of VAT, of their supplies of goods and services does not exceed by more than EUR 35 000 , or the equivalent in national currency, the amount of the annual turnover which is used as a reference for application of the exemption for small enterprises provided for in Articles 282 to 292; (b) the total annual value, exclusive of VAT, of supplies of goods carried out by them in accordance with the conditions specified in Article 138 does not exceed EUR 15 000 or the equivalent in national currency; (c) none of the supplies of goods carried out by them in accordance with the conditions specified in Article 138 is a supply of new means of transport.
Article 271 
By virtue of the authorisation referred to in Article 269, Member States which set at over three months the tax period in respect of which taxable persons must submit the VAT return provided for in Article 250 may permit such persons to submit recapitulative statements in respect of the same period where those taxable persons meet the following three conditions: (a) the total annual value, exclusive of VAT, of their supplies of goods and services does not exceed EUR 200 000 or the equivalent in national currency; (b) the total annual value, exclusive of VAT, of supplies of goods carried out by them in accordance with the conditions specified in Article 138 does not exceed EUR 15 000 or the equivalent in national currency; (c) none of the supplies of goods carried out by them in accordance with the conditions specified in Article 138 is a supply of new means of transport.
Article 272 
1. Member States may release the following taxable persons from certain or all obligations referred to in Chapters 2 to 6: (a) taxable persons whose intra-Community acquisitions of goods are not subject to VAT pursuant to Article 3(1); (b) taxable persons carrying out none of the transactions referred to in Articles 20, 21, 22, 33, 36, 138 and 141; (c) taxable persons carrying out only supplies of goods or of services which are exempt pursuant to Articles 132, 135 and 136, Articles 146 to 149 and Articles 151, 152 or 153; (d) taxable persons covered by the exemption for small enterprises provided for in Articles 282 to 292; (e) taxable persons covered by the common flat-rate scheme for farmers. Member States may not release the taxable persons referred to in point (b) of the first subparagraph from the invoicing obligations laid down in Articles 220 to 236 and Articles 238, 239 and 240. 2. If Member States exercise the option under point (e) of the first subparagraph of paragraph 1, they shall take the measures necessary to ensure the correct application of the transitional arrangements for the taxation of intra-Community transactions. 3. Member States may release taxable persons other than those referred to in paragraph 1 from certain of the accounting obligations referred to in Article 242.
Amendment rationale: CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL 1. Article 97(1) of Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax[1] (hereinafter "the VAT Directive") provides that from 1 January 2006 until 31 December 2010 the standard rate may not be less than 15% and Article 97(2) stipulates that the Council shall decide, in accordance with Article 93 of the Treaty, on the level of the standard rate of value added tax (VAT) to be applied after 31 December 2010. 2. This provision was based on Article 93 of the Treaty establishing the European Community (the EC Treaty). As from 1 December 2009, Article 93 of the EC Treaty is replaced by Article 113 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU). Article 113 TFEU stipulates that the Council shall, acting unanimously in accordance with a special legislative procedure and after consulting the European Parliament and the Economic and Social Committee, adopt provisions for the harmonisation of legislation concerning turnover taxes to the extent that such harmonisation is necessary to ensure the establishment and functioning of the internal market and to avoid distortion of competition. 3. With a view to establishing the internal market on 1 January 1993, the Commission presented proposals intended to set up a definitive system of tax harmonisation. 4. However, when it became clear that it would be impossible to adopt the Commission's proposals before 1 January 1993, the Council decided to adopt a transitional system. With regard to VAT rates, it adopted Directive 92/77/EEC[2]. 5. That Directive introduced a system of minimum rates. It stipulated that from 1 January 1993 to 31 December 1996, the standard rate could not be set lower than 15%. This provision has been extended four times and applies until 31 December 2010. 6. To maintain the degree of harmonisation of rates already achieved, the Commission has twice presented proposals providing for a standard rate band with a minimum rate of 15% and a maximum rate of 25%[3]. The band was derived from the rates applied in practice in Member States, where standard rates have always varied between 15% and 25%. 7. In both cases, the proposals to approximate rates were amended by the Council,[4] which kept only the principle of a minimum rate, referring to a 15% minimum rate comparable to the system introduced by the 1992 Directive. 8. However, these Council Directives were adopted with a statement for the Council minutes mentioning Member States' efforts to avoid widening the 10 percentage point span between the lowest and highest rates applied. This demonstrates the continued concerns of Member States about distortions between high and low rate countries and the possible budgetary effects of different levels of VAT rates. In the light of the current economic crisis, there are further arguments for keeping a minimum standard rate to be laid down in the VAT Directive. 9. Despite various improvements to the common VAT system based on the Commission's pragmatic, phased VAT strategy launched in 2000[5] and updated in 2003[6], the VAT system continues to suffer from shortcomings and high administrative burdens. This means it needs to be fundamentally reassessed. New economic realities, technological processes, fraud patterns etc. also give rise to new challenges. That is why the Commission plans to publish a consultative green paper soon on a new VAT strategy. This will launch a consultation on future tax harmonisation. Only in the light of the outcome of that process can an appropriate decision be taken on the level of standard rates of VAT in the EU. 10. Moreover, recent modifications to the VAT Directive[7] have favoured taxation at the place of consumption, as this results in fewer possibilities for cross-border transactions seeking lower VAT rates, leading to distortions of competition. However, it remains important to prevent growing divergence in standard VAT rates applied by Member States from leading to structural imbalances in the EU and distortions of competition in some sectors of activity. To this end, it is common practice in the field of indirect taxes, both for excise duties and VAT, to set minimum rates. Although no maximum rate is proposed, the span between the standard rates applied in the Member States can – as is currently the case – be expected to ensure the proper functioning of the internal market while acknowledging the possible need for new budgetary resources from consumption taxes. 11. The accession of new Member States on 1 May 2004 and on 1 January 2007 did not alter the situation regarding the standard rate. That still ranges from 15% to 25% in 27 Member States. Two Member States (Cyprus and Luxembourg) apply a 15% rate and three a 25% rate (Denmark, Hungary and Sweden). 12. In these circumstances, it therefore appears appropriate to maintain the principle of a minimum standard VAT rate of 15%, and to propose that the current arrangements be extended. 13. To give businesses necessary legal certainty, and allow further evaluation of the appropriate level of the standard VAT rate at EU level, it seems appropriate to extend the provision for another five years, while the Commission reflects on a new VAT strategy and re-examines the standard VAT rate appropriate for a common approach. 14. Since the application of the minimum standard rate under Article 97(1) of Directive 2006/112/EC expires on 31 December 2010, the object of this proposal is to enable the Council to extend the period during which this rate applies. The minimum standard VAT rate is therefore set at 15% for five years from 1 January 2011 to 31 December 2015. The Commission would also expect the Council to renew the statement for the minutes agreed earlier on the span between the lowest and highest rates applied for that same period.
Revised version (Article 272 ):
1. Member States may release the following taxable persons from certain or all obligations referred to in Chapters 2 to 6: (a) taxable persons whose intra-Community acquisitions of goods are not subject to VAT pursuant to Article 3(1); (b) taxable persons carrying out none of the transactions referred to in Articles 20, 21, 22, 33, 36, 138 and 141; (c) taxable persons carrying out only supplies of goods or of services which are exempt pursuant to Articles 132, 135 and 136, Articles 146 to 149 and Articles 151, 152 or 153; (d) taxable persons covered by the exemption for small enterprises provided for in Articles 282 to 292; (e) taxable persons covered by the common flat-rate scheme for farmers. Member States may not release the taxable persons referred to in point (b) of the first subparagraph from the invoicing obligations laid down in Sections 3 to 6 of Chapter 3 and Section 3 of Chapter 4. 2. If Member States exercise the option under point (e) of the first subparagraph of paragraph 1, they shall take the measures necessary to ensure the correct application of the transitional arrangements for the taxation of intra-Community transactions. 3. Member States may release taxable persons other than those referred to in paragraph 1 from certain of the accounting obligations referred to in Article 242.
Article 273 
Member States may impose other obligations which they deem necessary to ensure the correct collection of VAT and to prevent evasion, subject to the requirement of equal treatment as between domestic transactions and transactions carried out between Member States by taxable persons and provided that such obligations do not, in trade between Member States, give rise to formalities connected with the crossing of frontiers. The option under the first paragraph may not be relied upon in order to impose additional invoicing obligations over and above those laid down in Chapter 3.
Article 274 
Articles 275, 276 and 277 shall apply to the importation of goods in free circulation which enter the Community from a third territory forming part of the customs territory of the Community.
Article 275 
The formalities relating to the importation of the goods referred to in Article 274 shall be the same as those laid down by the Community customs provisions in force for the importation of goods into the customs territory of the Community.
Article 276 
Where dispatch or transport of the goods referred to in Article 274 ends at a place situated outside the Member State of their entry into the Community, they shall circulate in the Community under the internal Community transit procedure laid down by the Community customs provisions in force, in so far as they have been the subject of a declaration placing them under that procedure on their entry into the Community.
Article 277 
Where, on their entry into the Community, the goods referred to in Article 274 are in one of the situations which would entitle them, if they were imported within the meaning of the first paragraph of Article 30, to be covered by one of the arrangements or situations referred to in Article 156, or by a temporary importation arrangement with full exemption from import duties, Member States shall take the measures necessary to ensure that the goods may remain in the Community under the same conditions as those laid down for the application of those arrangements or situations.
Article 278 
Articles 279 and 280 shall apply to the exportation of goods in free circulation which are dispatched or transported from a Member State to a third territory forming part of the customs territory of the Community.
Article 279 
The formalities relating to the exportation of the goods referred to in Article 278 from the territory of the Community shall be the same as those laid down by the Community customs provisions in force for the exportation of goods from the customs territory of the Community.
Article 280 
In the case of goods which are temporarily exported from the Community, in order to be reimported, Member States shall take the measures necessary to ensure that, on reimportation into the Community, such goods may be covered by the same provisions as would have applied if they had been temporarily exported from the customs territory of the Community.
Article 281 
Member States which might encounter difficulties in applying the normal VAT arrangements to small enterprises, by reason of the activities or structure of such enterprises, may, subject to such conditions and limits as they may set, and after consulting the VAT Committee, apply simplified procedures, such as flat-rate schemes, for charging and collecting VAT provided that they do not lead to a reduction thereof.
Article 282 
The exemptions and graduated tax relief provided for in this Section shall apply to the supply of goods and services by small enterprises.
Article 283 
1. The arrangements provided for in this Section shall not apply to the following transactions: (a) transactions carried out on an occasional basis, as referred to in Article 12; (b) supplies of new means of transport carried out in accordance with the conditions specified in Article 138(1) and (2)(a); (c) supplies of goods or services carried out by a taxable person who is not established in the Member State in which the VAT is due. 2. Member States may exclude transactions other than those referred to in paragraph 1 from the arrangements provided for in this Section.
Amendment rationale: CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL Reasons for and objectives of the proposal Value added tax (VAT) is a general consumption tax borne ultimately by the final consumer but collected by businesses supplying goods or services. The scope of VAT, as set out in Article 2 of the VAT Directive 1 , is very broad, covering any supply of goods and services for consideration by a taxable person within the territory of a Member State and any importation of goods into the European Union (EU). One of the aims of the VAT Directive was to draw up a common list of VAT exemptions so that EU own resources could be collected in a uniform manner in all Member States 2 . That is why the exemption of any transaction from VAT requires a specific provision in the VAT Directive. The VAT Directive does not provide for any general exemption for the supply of goods or services for security and defence purposes. In principle, goods or services supplied to, or goods imported by, armed forces will therefore carry VAT 3 . The cost of VAT is reflected in an increase in the revenues that the tax generates for the state treasury (as public bodies, the military forces are unable to recuperate such VAT), which in turn feed into the budget that finances activities such as national defence. The Directive does provide for an exemption for supplies to the armed forces of any state party to the North Atlantic Treaty that are taking part in a common defence effort outside their own state. This exemption was established to address situations in which the circle of revenue and expenditure flow is broken, because VAT on such supplies would normally constitute revenue for the state in which the armed forces are located, rather than their own. The Excise Directive 4 provides for a similar exemption from excise duty 5 for movements of excise goods to the armed forces of any North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO) member. While NATO defence effort has been covered by the VAT Directive since 1977 6 and the Excise Directive since 1993, neither of the exemptions covers supplies linked to the common defence effort within the Union framework, because there is as yet no common Union defence policy. However, the common security and defence policy (CSDP), which was established as the European security and defence policy (ESDP) in 2000 7 , is a key instrument for external action and includes the progressive framing of a common Union defence policy 8 . The Lisbon Treaty, which came into force in December 2009, was a milestone in the development of the CSDP. The Treaty on European Union (TEU), as amended by the Lisbon Treaty, includes a mutual assistance clause 9 and allowed Member States to strengthen their cooperation in military matters through ‘permanent structured cooperation’ (PESCO) 10 . The Lisbon Treaty also established the European External Action Service (EEAS), which assists the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy in all her responsibilities, including the CSDP. The fact that the High Representative is also one of the Vice-Presidents of the Commission facilitates the bringing together of all necessary EU assets and the application of a comprehensive approach to EU crisis management. The EU Military Committee (EUMC), which was set up in 2001 11 , is the Council’s highest military body. It directs all military activities within the EU framework and advises on the planning and execution of military missions and operations under the CSDP, and on the development of military capabilities. Also established in 2001 12 and working under the military direction of the EUMC, the European Union Military Staff (EUMS) is the source of the EU’s military expertise 13 . It provides early warning, situation assessment and strategic planning for missions and tasks referred to in Articles 42(1) and 43(1) TEU. It also contributes to the elaboration, assessment and review of the capability goals. In June 2016, the global strategy for the European Union’s foreign and security policy (EUGS) 14 laid the ground for developing CSDP further towards three core priorities: responding to external conflicts and crises, building the capabilities of partners and protecting the Union and its citizens. In December 2017 15 , the European Council invited the High Representative, the Commission and the Member States to bring forward work on military mobility, both under PESCO and in the context of EU NATO cooperation. In March 2018, as a follow-up to their November 2017 Joint Communication on improving military mobility in the EU 16 , the Commission and the High Representative presented a Joint Communication on the action plan on military mobility 17 . The action plan recognises the need for equal treatment of defence efforts with a view to reducing administrative burden and thus delays and costs in military mobility, and providing Member States with an incentive to cooperate 18 . It requires the Commission to assess the feasibility of aligning the VAT treatment of defence efforts in the EU framework and under the NATO umbrella. On 19 November 2018, the Council concluded on Security and Defence in the context of the EUGS 19 . The Council welcomed the substantive progress made in the area of security and defence during the previous two years and stressed the importance of keeping the momentum through the continued engagement of the Member States and EU institutions. In particular, the Council welcomed the progress in the implementation of PESCO and the ongoing implementation of efforts to improve the mobility of military personnel, materiel and equipment for routine activities and during crisis and conflict, within and beyond the EU. In line with the action plan and the Council conclusions, the objective of this proposal is to align the VAT treatment of defence efforts in the EU and NATO frameworks as far as is feasible. The proposal has to acknowledge that, while there is a collective defence effort under the North Atlantic Treaty, no common Union defence policy exists as yet. The arrangements for exemptions from excise duties, as provided for in the Excise Directive, should be aligned in a similar way.
Revised version (Article 283 ):
1. The arrangements provided for in this Section shall not apply to the following transactions: (a) transactions carried out on an occasional basis, as referred to in Article 12; (c) supplies of goods or services carried out by a taxable person who is not established in the Member State in which the VAT is due. 2. Member States may exclude transactions other than those referred to in paragraph 1 from the arrangements provided for in this Section.
Article 284 
1. Member States which have exercised the option under Article 14 of Council Directive 67/228/EEC of 11 April 1967 on the harmonisation of legislation of Member States concerning turnover taxes — Structure and procedures for application of the common system of value added tax ( 15 ) of introducing exemptions or graduated tax relief may retain them, and the arrangements for applying them, if they comply with the VAT rules. 2. Member States which, at 17 May 1977, exempted taxable persons whose annual turnover was less than the equivalent in national currency of 5 000 European units of account at the conversion rate on that date, may raise that ceiling up to EUR 5 000. Member States which applied graduated tax relief may neither raise the ceiling for graduated tax relief nor render the conditions for the granting of it more favourable.
Article 285 
Member States which have not exercised the option under Article 14 of Directive 67/228/EEC may exempt taxable persons whose annual turnover is no higher than EUR 5 000 or the equivalent in national currency. The Member States referred to in the first paragraph may grant graduated tax relief to taxable persons whose annual turnover exceeds the ceiling fixed by them for its application.
Article 286 
Member States which, at 17 May 1977, exempted taxable persons whose annual turnover was equal to or higher than the equivalent in national currency of 5 000 European units of account at the conversion rate on that date, may raise that ceiling in order to maintain the value of the exemption in real terms.
Article 287 
Member States which acceded after 1 January 1978 may exempt taxable persons whose annual turnover is no higher than the equivalent in national currency of the following amounts at the conversion rate on the day of their accession: (1) Greece: 10 000 European units of account; (2) Spain: ECU 10 000; (3) Portugal: ECU 10 000; (4) Austria: ECU 35 000; (5) Finland: ECU 10 000; (6) Sweden: ECU 10 000; (7) Czech Republic: EUR 35 000; (8) Estonia: EUR 16 000; (9) Cyprus: EUR 15 600; (10) Latvia: EUR 17 200; (11) Lithuania: EUR 29 000; (12) Hungary: EUR 35 000; (13) Malta: EUR 37 000 if the economic activity consists principally in the supply of goods, EUR 24 300 if the economic activity consists principally in the supply of services with a low value added (high inputs), and EUR 14 600 in other cases, namely supplies of services with a high value added (low inputs); (14) Poland: EUR 10 000; (15) Slovenia: EUR 25 000; (16) Slovakia: EUR 35 000; (17) Bulgaria: EUR 25 600; (18) Romania: EUR 35 000.
Amendment rationale: CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL With Decision 2012/419/EU amending the status of Mayotte with regard to the European Union, the European Council has decided that, from 1 January 2014, the status of Mayotte will be that of outermost region within the meaning of Article 349 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) instead of that of an overseas country or territory (OCT) within the meaning of Article 355(2) of the TFEU. To this end, in the above-mentioned European Council Decision, Mayotte has been added to the list of outermost regions in Articles 349 and 355(1) of the TFEU. Union legislation on VAT (Directive 2006/112/EC[1]) and excise duties (Directive 2008/118/EC[2]) will therefore apply in Mayotte after the change of status. In substance, the objective of this proposal is to bring Mayotte's situation into line with that of other French outermost regions by excluding it from the scope of Directives 2006/112/EC and 2008/118/EC. Furthermore, by referring to Articles 349 and 355(1) of the TFEU, the intention is to make it clearer that all these regions, including Mayotte, are excluded from the scope of these Directives.
Revised version (Article 287 ):
Member States which acceded after 1 January 1978 may exempt taxable persons whose annual turnover is no higher than the equivalent in national currency of the following amounts at the conversion rate on the day of their accession: (1) Greece: 10 000 European units of account; (2) Spain: ECU 10 000; (3) Portugal: ECU 10 000; (4) Austria: ECU 35 000; (5) Finland: ECU 10 000; (6) Sweden: ECU 10 000; (7) Czech Republic: EUR 35 000; (8) Estonia: EUR 16 000; (9) Cyprus: EUR 15 600; (10) Latvia: EUR 17 200; (11) Lithuania: EUR 29 000; (12) Hungary: EUR 35 000; (13) Malta: EUR 37 000 if the economic activity consists principally in the supply of goods, EUR 24 300 if the economic activity consists principally in the supply of services with a low value added (high inputs), and EUR 14 600 in other cases, namely supplies of services with a high value added (low inputs); (14) Poland: EUR 10 000; (15) Slovenia: EUR 25 000; (16) Slovakia: EUR 35 000; (17) Bulgaria: EUR 25 600; (18) Romania: EUR 35 000; (19) Croatia: EUR 35 000.