Article 1 Subject matter
This Regulation applies the arrangements for products originating in certain states which are part of the African, Caribbean and Pacific (ACP) Group of States provided for in agreements establishing, or leading to the establishment of, Economic Partnership Agreements.
Article 2 Scope
1. This Regulation shall apply to products originating in the regions and states listed in Annex I. 2. The Council, acting by qualified majority on a proposal from the Commission, shall amend Annex I to add regions or states from the ACP Group of States which have concluded negotiations on an agreement between the Community and that region or state which at least meets the requirements of Article XXIV GATT 1994. 3. Such region or state will remain on the list in Annex I unless the Council, acting by qualified majority upon a proposal from the Commission, amends Annex I to remove a region or state from that Annex, in particular where: (a) the region or state indicates that it intends not to ratify an agreement which has permitted it to be included in Annex I; (b) ratification of an agreement which has permitted a region or state to be included in Annex I has not taken place within a reasonable period of time such that the entry into force of the agreement is unduly delayed; or (c) the agreement is terminated, or the region or state concerned terminates its rights and obligations under the agreement but the agreement otherwise remains in force.
Amendment rationale: EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM 1. INTRODUCTION The entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon has led to significant changes both in the framework for the adoption of delegated and implementing acts and for the conduct of trade policy. As regards the adoption of delegated and implementing acts the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (hereinafter "the Treaty") clearly distinguishes between delegated and implementing acts. - The provisions of the Treaty on delegated acts, which are set out in Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, provide for the legislator to control the exercise of the Commission's powers by means of a right of revocation and/or a right of objection. - The provisions of the Treaty on implementing acts, which are set out in Article 291, do not provide any role for the European Parliament and the Council to control the Commission's exercise of implementing powers. Such control can only be exercised by the Member States. A legal framework is required to establish the mechanisms of such control. As regards trade policy, the Treaty of Lisbon makes the European Parliament co-legislator and its consent is required for the conclusion of agreements. On 9 March 2010 the Commission adopted a proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down the rules and general principles concerning mechanisms for control by Member States of the Commission’s exercise of implementing powers[1]. One of the key objectives of this proposal is to provide that the control of the Commission's exercise of its implementing powers is conducted not by the Council or the European Parliament but by the Member States as is required by Article 291 of the Treaty. In the proposal, this is achieved by the creation of procedures (the advisory and examination procedures) whereby the Commission's implementing acts are subject to control by the Member States combined with an automatic alignment[2] of existing procedures established under Council Decision 1999/468/EC of 28 June 1999 laying down the procedures for the exercise of implementing powers conferred on the Commission[3]. In this manner, the Commission's proposal will bring the exercise of control over the Commission's implementing acts in those areas where the procedures laid down in Council Decision 1999/468/EC apply in line with the requirements of Article 291 whereby it is the Member States and not the legislators that exercise such control. These main features were preserved in the text adopted in the first reading legislative resolution of the European Parliament on 16 December 2010 and in the undertakings given by the Council representative in its letter of 1 December 2010. The Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down the rules and general principles concerning mechanisms for control by Member States of the Commission’s exercise of implementing power is expected to enter into force on 1st March 2011. As noted in the Commission's proposal of 9 March 2010[4], the adaptation of existing basic acts provided for in Article 13[5] will not operate, however, for a significant number of basic acts in the field of the common commercial policy. These basic acts were not previously subject to the procedures laid down in Council Decision 1999/468/EC of 28 June 1999. The current proposal addresses procedures for the control or adoption of acts in twenty four basic acts in the field of the common commercial policy not previously subject to Council Decision 1999/468/EC. There is another act which would in principle fall under the scope of this proposal. This act is Council Regulation (EEC) No 1842/71 of 21 June 1971 on protective measures provided for in the additional protocol to the Association Agreement between the EEC and Turkey and to the interim agreement between the EEC and Turkey[6]. However, versions of this act are not available in a significant number of official languages of the Union. As a consequence, amending the act also requires the establishment of versions of the Regulation in the languages which are currently unavailable. Rather than fold this exercise into this proposal, it is considered preferable that the Regulation be replaced. At the time of replacement, the Commission will address the relevant decision-making issues (which are otherwise very similar to those arising for Council Regulation (EEC) No 2841/72 of 19 December 1972 on the safeguard measures provided for in the Agreement between the European Economic Community and the Swiss Confederation). The Commission will take the necessary steps in this regard as soon as possible.
Revised version (Article 2 Scope):
1. This Regulation shall apply to products originating in the regions and states listed in Annex I. 2. The Commission shall amend Annex I by means of delegated acts in accordance with Article 24a to add regions or states from the ACP Group of States which have concluded negotiations on an agreement between the Union and that region or state which at least meets the requirements of Article XXIV GATT 1994. 3. That region or state will remain on the list in Annex I to this Regulation unless the Commission adopts a delegated act in accordance with Article 24a amending Annex I to remove a region or state from that Annex, in particular where: (a) the region or state indicates that it intends not to ratify an agreement which has permitted it to be included in Annex I; (b) ratification of an agreement which has permitted a region or state to be included in Annex I has not taken place within a reasonable period of time such that the entry into force of the agreement is unduly delayed; or (c) the agreement is terminated, or the region or state concerned terminates its rights and obligations under the agreement but the agreement otherwise remains in force.
Article 3 Market access
1. Subject to Articles 6, 7 and 8, import duties shall be eliminated on all products of Chapters 1 to 97 but not 93 of the Harmonised System originating in a region or state listed in Annex I. Such elimination shall be subject to the transitional safeguard and surveillance mechanisms set out in Articles 9 and 10 and the general safeguards mechanism provided for in Articles 11 to 22. 2. For products of Chapter 93 of the Harmonised System originating in regions or states listed in Annex I the most favoured nation duties applied shall continue to apply. 3. Notwithstanding Article 3(2) of Regulation (EC) No 980/2005, products originating in least-developed countries listed in Annex I of that Regulation which are included in Annex I to this Regulation shall, in addition to the arrangements provided for in this Regulation, continue to benefit from the preferences provided for pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 980/2005 in respect of products: (a) of tariff heading 1006 except for subheading 1006 10 10, until 31 December 2009; and (b) of tariff heading 1701, until 30 September 2009. 4. Paragraph 1 of this Article and Articles 6, 7 and 8 shall not apply to products originating in South Africa. Such products shall be subject to the relevant provisions of the TDCA. In accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 24(3), an Annex shall be added to this Regulation setting out the regime applicable to products originating in South Africa once the relevant trade provisions of the TDCA have been superseded by the relevant provisions of an agreement establishing, or leading to the establishment of, an Economic Partnership Agreement. 5. Paragraph 1 shall not apply to products of tariff heading 0803 00 19 originating in a region or state listed in Annex I and released for free circulation in the Community's outermost regions until 1 January 2018. Paragraph 1 of this Article and Article 7 shall not apply to products of tariff heading 1701 originating in a region or state listed in Annex I and released for free circulation in the French overseas departments until 1 January 2018. Those periods shall be extended to 1 January 2028 unless otherwise agreed between the Parties to the relevant agreements. The Commission shall publish a notice in the Official Journal of the European Union informing interested parties of the termination of this provision.
Article 4 Rules of Origin
1. The rules of origin set out in Annex II shall apply in order to determine whether products originate in the regions or states listed in Annex I. 2. The rules of origin set out in Annex II shall be superseded by those annexed to any agreement with the regions or states listed in Annex I when that agreement is either provisionally applied, or enters into force, whichever is the earlier. The Commission shall publish a notice in the Official Journal of the European Union to inform operators. The notice shall specify the date of provisional application or entry into force, which shall be the date from which the rules of origin in the agreement shall apply to products originating in the regions and states listed in Annex I. 3. The Commission assisted by the Customs Code Committee established by Council Regulation (EEC) 2913/92 of 12 October 1992 establishing the Community Customs Code ( 10 ) shall monitor the implementation and application of the provisions of Annex II. Technical amendments and decisions on the management of Annex II may be adopted in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 247 and 247a of Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92.
Amendment rationale: EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM 1. INTRODUCTION The entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon has led to significant changes both in the framework for the adoption of delegated and implementing acts and for the conduct of trade policy. As regards the adoption of delegated and implementing acts the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (hereinafter "the Treaty") clearly distinguishes between delegated and implementing acts. - The provisions of the Treaty on delegated acts, which are set out in Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, provide for the legislator to control the exercise of the Commission's powers by means of a right of revocation and/or a right of objection. - The provisions of the Treaty on implementing acts, which are set out in Article 291, do not provide any role for the European Parliament and the Council to control the Commission's exercise of implementing powers. Such control can only be exercised by the Member States. A legal framework is required to establish the mechanisms of such control. As regards trade policy, the Treaty of Lisbon makes the European Parliament co-legislator and its consent is required for the conclusion of agreements. On 9 March 2010 the Commission adopted a proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down the rules and general principles concerning mechanisms for control by Member States of the Commission’s exercise of implementing powers[1]. One of the key objectives of this proposal is to provide that the control of the Commission's exercise of its implementing powers is conducted not by the Council or the European Parliament but by the Member States as is required by Article 291 of the Treaty. In the proposal, this is achieved by the creation of procedures (the advisory and examination procedures) whereby the Commission's implementing acts are subject to control by the Member States combined with an automatic alignment[2] of existing procedures established under Council Decision 1999/468/EC of 28 June 1999 laying down the procedures for the exercise of implementing powers conferred on the Commission[3]. In this manner, the Commission's proposal will bring the exercise of control over the Commission's implementing acts in those areas where the procedures laid down in Council Decision 1999/468/EC apply in line with the requirements of Article 291 whereby it is the Member States and not the legislators that exercise such control. These main features were preserved in the text adopted in the first reading legislative resolution of the European Parliament on 16 December 2010 and in the undertakings given by the Council representative in its letter of 1 December 2010. The Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down the rules and general principles concerning mechanisms for control by Member States of the Commission’s exercise of implementing power is expected to enter into force on 1st March 2011. As noted in the Commission's proposal of 9 March 2010[4], the adaptation of existing basic acts provided for in Article 13[5] will not operate, however, for a significant number of basic acts in the field of the common commercial policy. These basic acts were not previously subject to the procedures laid down in Council Decision 1999/468/EC of 28 June 1999. The current proposal addresses procedures for the control or adoption of acts in twenty four basic acts in the field of the common commercial policy not previously subject to Council Decision 1999/468/EC. There is another act which would in principle fall under the scope of this proposal. This act is Council Regulation (EEC) No 1842/71 of 21 June 1971 on protective measures provided for in the additional protocol to the Association Agreement between the EEC and Turkey and to the interim agreement between the EEC and Turkey[6]. However, versions of this act are not available in a significant number of official languages of the Union. As a consequence, amending the act also requires the establishment of versions of the Regulation in the languages which are currently unavailable. Rather than fold this exercise into this proposal, it is considered preferable that the Regulation be replaced. At the time of replacement, the Commission will address the relevant decision-making issues (which are otherwise very similar to those arising for Council Regulation (EEC) No 2841/72 of 19 December 1972 on the safeguard measures provided for in the Agreement between the European Economic Community and the Swiss Confederation). The Commission will take the necessary steps in this regard as soon as possible.
Revised version (Article 4 Rules of Origin):
1. The rules of origin set out in Annex II shall apply in order to determine whether products originate in the regions or states listed in Annex I. 2. The rules of origin set out in Annex II shall be superseded by those annexed to any agreement with the regions or states listed in Annex I when that agreement is either provisionally applied, or enters into force, whichever is the earlier. The Commission shall publish a notice in the Official Journal of the European Union to inform operators. The notice shall specify the date of provisional application or entry into force, which shall be the date from which the rules of origin in the agreement shall apply to products originating in the regions and states listed in Annex I. 3. The Commission shall be assisted by the Customs Code Committee established by Article 184 of Regulation (EC) No 450/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council ( 11 ). 4. The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 24a of this Regulation concerning technical amendments to Annex II where required to take account of amendments to other Union customs legislation. 5. Decisions on the management of Annex II to this Regulation may be adopted in accordance with the procedure referred to in Articles 183 and 184 of Regulation (EC) No 450/2008.
Article 5 Administrative cooperation
1. Where the Commission has made a finding, on the basis of objective information, of a failure to provide administrative cooperation and/or of irregularities or fraud, it may temporarily suspend the elimination of duties in Articles 3, 6 and 7 (hereafter referred to as the ‘relevant treatment’) in accordance with this Article. 2. For the purpose of this Article a failure to provide administrative cooperation shall mean, inter alia : (a) a repeated failure to respect relevant obligations requiring the verification of the originating status of the product(s) concerned; (b) a repeated refusal or undue delay in carrying out and/or communicating the results of subsequent verification of the proof of origin; (c) a repeated refusal or undue delay in obtaining authorisation to conduct administrative cooperation missions to verify the authenticity of documents or accuracy of information relating to the granting of the relevant treatment. For the purpose of this Article a finding of irregularities or fraud may be made, inter alia , where there is a rapid increase, without satisfactory explanation, in imports of goods exceeding the usual level of production and export capacity of the region or state concerned. 3. Where the Commission, on the basis of information provided by a Member State or on its own initiative, finds that the conditions laid down in paragraphs 1 and 2 are fulfilled, the relevant treatment may be suspended in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 24(2), provided the Commission has first: (a) informed the Committee provided for in Article 24; (b) notified the region or state concerned in accordance with any relevant procedures applicable between the Community and that state or region; and (c) published a notice in the Official Journal of the European Union stating that a finding has been made of a failure to provide administrative cooperation, irregularities or fraud. 4. The period of suspension under this Article shall be limited to that necessary to protect the Community's financial interests. It shall not exceed six months, which may be renewed. At the end of that period, the Commission shall decide either to terminate the suspension after informing the Committee provided for in Article 24 or to extend the period of suspension in accordance with the procedure referred to in paragraph 3 of this Article. 5. The temporary suspension procedures set out in paragraphs 2 to 4 shall be superseded by those set out in any agreement with the regions or states listed in Annex I when that agreement is either provisionally applied or enters into force, whichever is the earlier. The Commission shall publish a notice in the Official Journal of the European Union to inform operators. The notice shall specify the date of provisional application or entry into force, which shall be the date from which the temporary suspension procedures in the agreement shall apply to products covered by this Regulation. 6. In order to implement the temporary suspension provided for in any agreement with the regions or states listed in Annex I, the Commission shall, without undue delay: (a) inform the Committee provided for in Article 24 that a finding has been made of a failure to provide administrative cooperation, irregularities or fraud; and (b) publish the notice in the Official Journal of the European Union stating that a finding has been made of a failure to provide administrative cooperation, irregularities or fraud. The decision suspending the relevant treatment shall be adopted in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 24(2).
Amendment rationale: EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM 1. INTRODUCTION The entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon has led to significant changes both in the framework for the adoption of delegated and implementing acts and for the conduct of trade policy. As regards the adoption of delegated and implementing acts the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (hereinafter "the Treaty") clearly distinguishes between delegated and implementing acts. - The provisions of the Treaty on delegated acts, which are set out in Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, provide for the legislator to control the exercise of the Commission's powers by means of a right of revocation and/or a right of objection. - The provisions of the Treaty on implementing acts, which are set out in Article 291, do not provide any role for the European Parliament and the Council to control the Commission's exercise of implementing powers. Such control can only be exercised by the Member States. A legal framework is required to establish the mechanisms of such control. As regards trade policy, the Treaty of Lisbon makes the European Parliament co-legislator and its consent is required for the conclusion of agreements. On 9 March 2010 the Commission adopted a proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down the rules and general principles concerning mechanisms for control by Member States of the Commission’s exercise of implementing powers[1]. One of the key objectives of this proposal is to provide that the control of the Commission's exercise of its implementing powers is conducted not by the Council or the European Parliament but by the Member States as is required by Article 291 of the Treaty. In the proposal, this is achieved by the creation of procedures (the advisory and examination procedures) whereby the Commission's implementing acts are subject to control by the Member States combined with an automatic alignment[2] of existing procedures established under Council Decision 1999/468/EC of 28 June 1999 laying down the procedures for the exercise of implementing powers conferred on the Commission[3]. In this manner, the Commission's proposal will bring the exercise of control over the Commission's implementing acts in those areas where the procedures laid down in Council Decision 1999/468/EC apply in line with the requirements of Article 291 whereby it is the Member States and not the legislators that exercise such control. These main features were preserved in the text adopted in the first reading legislative resolution of the European Parliament on 16 December 2010 and in the undertakings given by the Council representative in its letter of 1 December 2010. The Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down the rules and general principles concerning mechanisms for control by Member States of the Commission’s exercise of implementing power is expected to enter into force on 1st March 2011. As noted in the Commission's proposal of 9 March 2010[4], the adaptation of existing basic acts provided for in Article 13[5] will not operate, however, for a significant number of basic acts in the field of the common commercial policy. These basic acts were not previously subject to the procedures laid down in Council Decision 1999/468/EC of 28 June 1999. The current proposal addresses procedures for the control or adoption of acts in twenty four basic acts in the field of the common commercial policy not previously subject to Council Decision 1999/468/EC. There is another act which would in principle fall under the scope of this proposal. This act is Council Regulation (EEC) No 1842/71 of 21 June 1971 on protective measures provided for in the additional protocol to the Association Agreement between the EEC and Turkey and to the interim agreement between the EEC and Turkey[6]. However, versions of this act are not available in a significant number of official languages of the Union. As a consequence, amending the act also requires the establishment of versions of the Regulation in the languages which are currently unavailable. Rather than fold this exercise into this proposal, it is considered preferable that the Regulation be replaced. At the time of replacement, the Commission will address the relevant decision-making issues (which are otherwise very similar to those arising for Council Regulation (EEC) No 2841/72 of 19 December 1972 on the safeguard measures provided for in the Agreement between the European Economic Community and the Swiss Confederation). The Commission will take the necessary steps in this regard as soon as possible.
Revised version (Article 5 Administrative cooperation):
1. Where the Commission has made a finding, on the basis of objective information, of a failure to provide administrative cooperation and/or of irregularities or fraud, it may temporarily suspend the elimination of duties in Articles 3, 6 and 7 (hereafter referred to as the ‘relevant treatment’) in accordance with this Article. 2. For the purpose of this Article a failure to provide administrative cooperation shall mean, inter alia : (a) a repeated failure to respect relevant obligations requiring the verification of the originating status of the product(s) concerned; (b) a repeated refusal or undue delay in carrying out and/or communicating the results of subsequent verification of the proof of origin; (c) a repeated refusal or undue delay in obtaining authorisation to conduct administrative cooperation missions to verify the authenticity of documents or accuracy of information relating to the granting of the relevant treatment. For the purpose of this Article a finding of irregularities or fraud may be made, inter alia , where there is a rapid increase, without satisfactory explanation, in imports of goods exceeding the usual level of production and export capacity of the region or state concerned. 3. Where the Commission, on the basis of information provided by a Member State or on its own initiative, finds that the conditions laid down in paragraphs 1 and 2 of this Article are fulfilled, the relevant treatment may be suspended in accordance with the advisory procedure referred to in Article 21(4), provided that the Commission has first: (a) informed the Committee provided for in Article 24; (b) notified the region or state concerned in accordance with any relevant procedures applicable between the Community and that state or region; and (c) published a notice in the Official Journal of the European Union stating that a finding has been made of a failure to provide administrative cooperation, irregularities or fraud. 4. The period of suspension under this Article shall be limited to the period necessary to protect the Union's financial interests. It shall not exceed six months, however that period may be renewed. At the end of that period, the Commission shall decide either to terminate the suspension or to extend the period of suspension in accordance with the advisory procedure referred to in Article 21(4). 5. The temporary suspension procedures set out in paragraphs 2 to 4 shall be superseded by those set out in any agreement with the regions or states listed in Annex I when that agreement is either provisionally applied or enters into force, whichever is the earlier. The Commission shall publish a notice in the Official Journal of the European Union to inform operators. The notice shall specify the date of provisional application or entry into force, which shall be the date from which the temporary suspension procedures in the agreement shall apply to products covered by this Regulation. 6. In order to implement the temporary suspension provided for in any agreement with the regions or states listed in Annex I, the Commission shall, without undue delay: (a) inform the Committee provided for in Article 24 that a finding has been made of a failure to provide administrative cooperation, irregularities or fraud; and (b) publish the notice in the Official Journal of the European Union stating that a finding has been made of a failure to provide administrative cooperation, irregularities or fraud. The decision suspending the relevant treatment shall be adopted in accordance with the advisory procedure referred to in Article 21(4).
Article 6 Zero duty tariff rate quotas and eventual elimination of duties
1. Import duties on the products of tariff heading 1006 shall be eliminated as from 1 January 2010, with the exception of import duties on the products of subheading 1006 10 10 which shall be eliminated as from 1 January 2008. 2. The following tariff rate quotas at zero duty shall be opened for products of tariff heading 1006 except for subheading 1006 10 10 originating in the regions or states listed in Annex I which form part of the CARIFORUM region: (a) 187 000 tonnes, husked rice equivalent, for the period from 1 January 2008 to 31 December 2008; (b) 250 000 tonnes, husked rice equivalent, for the period from 1 January 2009 to 31 December 2009. 3. The detailed rules for implementing the tariff quotas referred to in paragraph 2 shall be determined in accordance with the procedures referred to in Articles 13 and 26(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1785/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in rice ( 11 ).
Amendment rationale: EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM 1. INTRODUCTION The entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon has led to significant changes both in the framework for the adoption of delegated and implementing acts and for the conduct of trade policy. As regards the adoption of delegated and implementing acts the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (hereinafter "the Treaty") clearly distinguishes between delegated and implementing acts. - The provisions of the Treaty on delegated acts, which are set out in Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, provide for the legislator to control the exercise of the Commission's powers by means of a right of revocation and/or a right of objection. - The provisions of the Treaty on implementing acts, which are set out in Article 291, do not provide any role for the European Parliament and the Council to control the Commission's exercise of implementing powers. Such control can only be exercised by the Member States. A legal framework is required to establish the mechanisms of such control. As regards trade policy, the Treaty of Lisbon makes the European Parliament co-legislator and its consent is required for the conclusion of agreements. On 9 March 2010 the Commission adopted a proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down the rules and general principles concerning mechanisms for control by Member States of the Commission’s exercise of implementing powers[1]. One of the key objectives of this proposal is to provide that the control of the Commission's exercise of its implementing powers is conducted not by the Council or the European Parliament but by the Member States as is required by Article 291 of the Treaty. In the proposal, this is achieved by the creation of procedures (the advisory and examination procedures) whereby the Commission's implementing acts are subject to control by the Member States combined with an automatic alignment[2] of existing procedures established under Council Decision 1999/468/EC of 28 June 1999 laying down the procedures for the exercise of implementing powers conferred on the Commission[3]. In this manner, the Commission's proposal will bring the exercise of control over the Commission's implementing acts in those areas where the procedures laid down in Council Decision 1999/468/EC apply in line with the requirements of Article 291 whereby it is the Member States and not the legislators that exercise such control. These main features were preserved in the text adopted in the first reading legislative resolution of the European Parliament on 16 December 2010 and in the undertakings given by the Council representative in its letter of 1 December 2010. The Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down the rules and general principles concerning mechanisms for control by Member States of the Commission’s exercise of implementing power is expected to enter into force on 1st March 2011. As noted in the Commission's proposal of 9 March 2010[4], the adaptation of existing basic acts provided for in Article 13[5] will not operate, however, for a significant number of basic acts in the field of the common commercial policy. These basic acts were not previously subject to the procedures laid down in Council Decision 1999/468/EC of 28 June 1999. The current proposal addresses procedures for the control or adoption of acts in twenty four basic acts in the field of the common commercial policy not previously subject to Council Decision 1999/468/EC. There is another act which would in principle fall under the scope of this proposal. This act is Council Regulation (EEC) No 1842/71 of 21 June 1971 on protective measures provided for in the additional protocol to the Association Agreement between the EEC and Turkey and to the interim agreement between the EEC and Turkey[6]. However, versions of this act are not available in a significant number of official languages of the Union. As a consequence, amending the act also requires the establishment of versions of the Regulation in the languages which are currently unavailable. Rather than fold this exercise into this proposal, it is considered preferable that the Regulation be replaced. At the time of replacement, the Commission will address the relevant decision-making issues (which are otherwise very similar to those arising for Council Regulation (EEC) No 2841/72 of 19 December 1972 on the safeguard measures provided for in the Agreement between the European Economic Community and the Swiss Confederation). The Commission will take the necessary steps in this regard as soon as possible.
Revised version (Article 6 Zero duty tariff rate quotas and eventual elimination of duties):
1. Import duties on the products of tariff heading 1006 shall be eliminated as from 1 January 2010, with the exception of import duties on the products of subheading 1006 10 10 which shall be eliminated as from 1 January 2008. 2. The following tariff rate quotas at zero duty shall be opened for products of tariff heading 1006 except for subheading 1006 10 10 originating in the regions or states listed in Annex I which form part of the CARIFORUM region: (a) 187 000 tonnes, husked rice equivalent, for the period from 1 January 2008 to 31 December 2008; (b) 250 000 tonnes, husked rice equivalent, for the period from 1 January 2009 to 31 December 2009. 3. The detailed rules for implementing the tariff quotas referred to in paragraph 2 of this Article shall be determined in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 21(5).
Article 7 Zero duty tariff rate quotas and eventual elimination of duties
1. Import duties on products of tariff heading 1701 shall be eliminated as from 1 October 2009. 2. In addition to the tariff rate quotas opened and administered pursuant to Article 28 of Council Regulation (EC) No 318/2006 of 20 February 2006 on the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector ( 12 ), the following tariff rate quotas shall be opened for products of tariff heading 1701 for the period from 1 October 2008 to 30 September 2009: (a) 150 000 tonnes, white sugar equivalent, at zero duty reserved for products originating in least-developed countries as listed in Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 980/2005 and which are listed in Annex I. This tariff rate quota shall be divided between regions according to quantities to be determined in conformity with the agreements qualifying regions or states for inclusion in Annex I; and (b) 80 000 tonnes, white sugar equivalent, at zero duty reserved for products originating in regions or states which are not least-developed countries and which are listed in Annex I. This tariff rate quota shall be divided between regions according to quantities to be determined in conformity with the agreements qualifying regions or states for inclusion in Annex I. 3. Article 30 of Regulation (EC) No 318/2006 shall apply to imports under the tariff rate quotas referred to in the previous paragraph. 4. The detailed rules for dividing by region and implementing the tariff quotas referred to in this Article shall be adopted in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 39(2) of Regulation (EC) No 318/2006.
Amendment rationale: EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM 1. INTRODUCTION The entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon has led to significant changes both in the framework for the adoption of delegated and implementing acts and for the conduct of trade policy. As regards the adoption of delegated and implementing acts the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (hereinafter "the Treaty") clearly distinguishes between delegated and implementing acts. - The provisions of the Treaty on delegated acts, which are set out in Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, provide for the legislator to control the exercise of the Commission's powers by means of a right of revocation and/or a right of objection. - The provisions of the Treaty on implementing acts, which are set out in Article 291, do not provide any role for the European Parliament and the Council to control the Commission's exercise of implementing powers. Such control can only be exercised by the Member States. A legal framework is required to establish the mechanisms of such control. As regards trade policy, the Treaty of Lisbon makes the European Parliament co-legislator and its consent is required for the conclusion of agreements. On 9 March 2010 the Commission adopted a proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down the rules and general principles concerning mechanisms for control by Member States of the Commission’s exercise of implementing powers[1]. One of the key objectives of this proposal is to provide that the control of the Commission's exercise of its implementing powers is conducted not by the Council or the European Parliament but by the Member States as is required by Article 291 of the Treaty. In the proposal, this is achieved by the creation of procedures (the advisory and examination procedures) whereby the Commission's implementing acts are subject to control by the Member States combined with an automatic alignment[2] of existing procedures established under Council Decision 1999/468/EC of 28 June 1999 laying down the procedures for the exercise of implementing powers conferred on the Commission[3]. In this manner, the Commission's proposal will bring the exercise of control over the Commission's implementing acts in those areas where the procedures laid down in Council Decision 1999/468/EC apply in line with the requirements of Article 291 whereby it is the Member States and not the legislators that exercise such control. These main features were preserved in the text adopted in the first reading legislative resolution of the European Parliament on 16 December 2010 and in the undertakings given by the Council representative in its letter of 1 December 2010. The Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down the rules and general principles concerning mechanisms for control by Member States of the Commission’s exercise of implementing power is expected to enter into force on 1st March 2011. As noted in the Commission's proposal of 9 March 2010[4], the adaptation of existing basic acts provided for in Article 13[5] will not operate, however, for a significant number of basic acts in the field of the common commercial policy. These basic acts were not previously subject to the procedures laid down in Council Decision 1999/468/EC of 28 June 1999. The current proposal addresses procedures for the control or adoption of acts in twenty four basic acts in the field of the common commercial policy not previously subject to Council Decision 1999/468/EC. There is another act which would in principle fall under the scope of this proposal. This act is Council Regulation (EEC) No 1842/71 of 21 June 1971 on protective measures provided for in the additional protocol to the Association Agreement between the EEC and Turkey and to the interim agreement between the EEC and Turkey[6]. However, versions of this act are not available in a significant number of official languages of the Union. As a consequence, amending the act also requires the establishment of versions of the Regulation in the languages which are currently unavailable. Rather than fold this exercise into this proposal, it is considered preferable that the Regulation be replaced. At the time of replacement, the Commission will address the relevant decision-making issues (which are otherwise very similar to those arising for Council Regulation (EEC) No 2841/72 of 19 December 1972 on the safeguard measures provided for in the Agreement between the European Economic Community and the Swiss Confederation). The Commission will take the necessary steps in this regard as soon as possible.
Revised version (Article 7 Zero duty tariff rate quotas and eventual elimination of duties):
1. Import duties on products of tariff heading 1701 shall be eliminated as from 1 October 2009. 2. In addition to the tariff rate quotas opened and administered pursuant to Article 28 of Council Regulation (EC) No 318/2006 of 20 February 2006 on the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector ( 12 ), the following tariff rate quotas shall be opened for products of tariff heading 1701 for the period from 1 October 2008 to 30 September 2009: (a) 150 000 tonnes, white sugar equivalent, at zero duty reserved for products originating in least-developed countries as listed in Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 980/2005 and which are listed in Annex I. This tariff rate quota shall be divided between regions according to quantities to be determined in conformity with the agreements qualifying regions or states for inclusion in Annex I; and (b) 80 000 tonnes, white sugar equivalent, at zero duty reserved for products originating in regions or states which are not least-developed countries and which are listed in Annex I. This tariff rate quota shall be divided between regions according to quantities to be determined in conformity with the agreements qualifying regions or states for inclusion in Annex I. 3. Article 30 of Regulation (EC) No 318/2006 shall apply to imports under the tariff rate quotas referred to in the previous paragraph. 4. The detailed rules for dividing by region and implementing the tariff quotas referred to in this Article shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 21(5).
Article 8 Transitional arrangement
For the period from 1 October 2009 to 30 September 2012, Article 7(1) shall not apply to imports of products of CN code 1701 unless the importer undertakes to purchase such products at a price not lower than 90 % of the reference price (on a c.i.f. basis) set in Article 3 of Regulation (EC) No 318/2006 for the relevant marketing year.
Article 9 Transitional safeguard mechanism for sugar
1. For the period from 1 October 2009 to 30 September 2015 the treatment granted in Article 7(1) for imports of products of tariff heading 1701 originating in regions or states listed in Annex I and which are not least-developed countries listed in Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 980/2005 may be suspended when: (a) imports originating in regions or states which are ACP States and which are not least-developed countries listed in Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 980/2005 exceed the following quantities: (i) 1,38 million tonnes in the marketing year 2009/2010; (ii) 1,45 million tonnes in the marketing year 2010/2011; (iii) 1,6 million tonnes in the marketing years 2011/2012 to 2014/2015; and (a) imports originating in regions or states which are ACP States and which are not least-developed countries listed in Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 980/2005 exceed the following quantities: (i) 1,38 million tonnes in the marketing year 2009/2010; (ii) 1,45 million tonnes in the marketing year 2010/2011; (iii) 1,6 million tonnes in the marketing years 2011/2012 to 2014/2015; and (b) imports originating in all ACP States exceed 3,5 million tonnes. 2. The quantities provided for in point (a) of paragraph 1 may be subdivided by region. 3. During the period referred to in paragraph 1, imports of products of tariff heading 1701 originating in regions or states listed in Annex I shall require an import licence. 4. The suspension of the treatment granted in Article 7(1) shall be terminated at the end of the marketing year in which it was introduced. 5. Detailed rules on the subdivision of quantities provided for in paragraph 1 and for the management of the system referred to in paragraphs 1, 3 and 4 of this Article, and suspension decisions shall be adopted in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 39(2) of Regulation (EC) No 318/2006.
Amendment rationale: EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM 1. INTRODUCTION The entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon has led to significant changes both in the framework for the adoption of delegated and implementing acts and for the conduct of trade policy. As regards the adoption of delegated and implementing acts the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (hereinafter "the Treaty") clearly distinguishes between delegated and implementing acts. - The provisions of the Treaty on delegated acts, which are set out in Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, provide for the legislator to control the exercise of the Commission's powers by means of a right of revocation and/or a right of objection. - The provisions of the Treaty on implementing acts, which are set out in Article 291, do not provide any role for the European Parliament and the Council to control the Commission's exercise of implementing powers. Such control can only be exercised by the Member States. A legal framework is required to establish the mechanisms of such control. As regards trade policy, the Treaty of Lisbon makes the European Parliament co-legislator and its consent is required for the conclusion of agreements. On 9 March 2010 the Commission adopted a proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down the rules and general principles concerning mechanisms for control by Member States of the Commission’s exercise of implementing powers[1]. One of the key objectives of this proposal is to provide that the control of the Commission's exercise of its implementing powers is conducted not by the Council or the European Parliament but by the Member States as is required by Article 291 of the Treaty. In the proposal, this is achieved by the creation of procedures (the advisory and examination procedures) whereby the Commission's implementing acts are subject to control by the Member States combined with an automatic alignment[2] of existing procedures established under Council Decision 1999/468/EC of 28 June 1999 laying down the procedures for the exercise of implementing powers conferred on the Commission[3]. In this manner, the Commission's proposal will bring the exercise of control over the Commission's implementing acts in those areas where the procedures laid down in Council Decision 1999/468/EC apply in line with the requirements of Article 291 whereby it is the Member States and not the legislators that exercise such control. These main features were preserved in the text adopted in the first reading legislative resolution of the European Parliament on 16 December 2010 and in the undertakings given by the Council representative in its letter of 1 December 2010. The Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down the rules and general principles concerning mechanisms for control by Member States of the Commission’s exercise of implementing power is expected to enter into force on 1st March 2011. As noted in the Commission's proposal of 9 March 2010[4], the adaptation of existing basic acts provided for in Article 13[5] will not operate, however, for a significant number of basic acts in the field of the common commercial policy. These basic acts were not previously subject to the procedures laid down in Council Decision 1999/468/EC of 28 June 1999. The current proposal addresses procedures for the control or adoption of acts in twenty four basic acts in the field of the common commercial policy not previously subject to Council Decision 1999/468/EC. There is another act which would in principle fall under the scope of this proposal. This act is Council Regulation (EEC) No 1842/71 of 21 June 1971 on protective measures provided for in the additional protocol to the Association Agreement between the EEC and Turkey and to the interim agreement between the EEC and Turkey[6]. However, versions of this act are not available in a significant number of official languages of the Union. As a consequence, amending the act also requires the establishment of versions of the Regulation in the languages which are currently unavailable. Rather than fold this exercise into this proposal, it is considered preferable that the Regulation be replaced. At the time of replacement, the Commission will address the relevant decision-making issues (which are otherwise very similar to those arising for Council Regulation (EEC) No 2841/72 of 19 December 1972 on the safeguard measures provided for in the Agreement between the European Economic Community and the Swiss Confederation). The Commission will take the necessary steps in this regard as soon as possible.
Revised version (Article 9 Transitional safeguard mechanism for sugar):
1. For the period from 1 October 2009 to 30 September 2015 the treatment granted in Article 7(1) for imports of products of tariff heading 1701 originating in regions or states listed in Annex I and which are not least-developed countries listed in Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 980/2005 may be suspended when: (a) imports originating in regions or states which are ACP States and which are not least-developed countries listed in Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 980/2005 exceed the following quantities: (i) 1,38 million tonnes in the marketing year 2009/2010; (ii) 1,45 million tonnes in the marketing year 2010/2011; (iii) 1,6 million tonnes in the marketing years 2011/2012 to 2014/2015; and (a) imports originating in regions or states which are ACP States and which are not least-developed countries listed in Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 980/2005 exceed the following quantities: (i) 1,38 million tonnes in the marketing year 2009/2010; (ii) 1,45 million tonnes in the marketing year 2010/2011; (iii) 1,6 million tonnes in the marketing years 2011/2012 to 2014/2015; and (b) imports originating in all ACP States exceed 3,5 million tonnes. 2. The quantities provided for in point (a) of paragraph 1 may be subdivided by region. 3. During the period referred to in paragraph 1, imports of products of tariff heading 1701 originating in regions or states listed in Annex I shall require an import licence. 4. The suspension of the treatment granted in Article 7(1) shall be terminated at the end of the marketing year in which it was introduced. 5. The Commission shall adopt detailed rules on the subdivision of quantities provided for in paragraph 1 for the management of the system referred to in paragraphs 1, 3 and 4 of this Article, and on suspension decisions in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 21(5).
Article 10 Transitional surveillance mechanism
1. For the period from 1 January 2008 to 30 September 2015, imports of products of tariff headings 1704 90 99, 1806 10 30, 1806 10 90, 2106 90 59, 2106 90 98 originating in regions or states listed in Annex I shall be subject to the surveillance mechanism provided for in Article 308d of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 of 2 July 1993 laying down provisions for the implementation of Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 establishing the Community Customs Code ( 13 ). 2. On the basis of that surveillance, the Commission shall check whether there is a cumulative increase of imports of one or more of those products originating in a particular region by more than 20 % in volume during a period of twelve consecutive months compared to the average of the yearly imports over the previous three twelve-month periods. 3. If the level referred to in paragraph 2 is reached, the Commission shall analyse the pattern of trade, the economic justification and the sugar content of such imports. If the Commission concludes that such imports are used to circumvent the tariff rate quotas, the transitional arrangements and the special safeguard mechanism provided for in Articles 7, 8 and 9, it may suspend the application of Article 3(1) to imports of products of tariff headings 1704 90 99, 1806 10 30, 1806 10 90, 2106 90 59, 2106 90 98 originating in regions or states listed in Annex I which are not least-developed countries listed in Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 980/2005 until the end of the marketing year concerned. 4. Detailed rules for the management of this system and suspension decisions shall be adopted in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 16 of Council Regulation (EC) No 3448/93 of 6 December 1993 laying down the trade arrangements applicable to certain goods resulting from the processing of agricultural products ( 14 ).
Amendment rationale: EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM 1. INTRODUCTION The entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon has led to significant changes both in the framework for the adoption of delegated and implementing acts and for the conduct of trade policy. As regards the adoption of delegated and implementing acts the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (hereinafter "the Treaty") clearly distinguishes between delegated and implementing acts. - The provisions of the Treaty on delegated acts, which are set out in Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, provide for the legislator to control the exercise of the Commission's powers by means of a right of revocation and/or a right of objection. - The provisions of the Treaty on implementing acts, which are set out in Article 291, do not provide any role for the European Parliament and the Council to control the Commission's exercise of implementing powers. Such control can only be exercised by the Member States. A legal framework is required to establish the mechanisms of such control. As regards trade policy, the Treaty of Lisbon makes the European Parliament co-legislator and its consent is required for the conclusion of agreements. On 9 March 2010 the Commission adopted a proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down the rules and general principles concerning mechanisms for control by Member States of the Commission’s exercise of implementing powers[1]. One of the key objectives of this proposal is to provide that the control of the Commission's exercise of its implementing powers is conducted not by the Council or the European Parliament but by the Member States as is required by Article 291 of the Treaty. In the proposal, this is achieved by the creation of procedures (the advisory and examination procedures) whereby the Commission's implementing acts are subject to control by the Member States combined with an automatic alignment[2] of existing procedures established under Council Decision 1999/468/EC of 28 June 1999 laying down the procedures for the exercise of implementing powers conferred on the Commission[3]. In this manner, the Commission's proposal will bring the exercise of control over the Commission's implementing acts in those areas where the procedures laid down in Council Decision 1999/468/EC apply in line with the requirements of Article 291 whereby it is the Member States and not the legislators that exercise such control. These main features were preserved in the text adopted in the first reading legislative resolution of the European Parliament on 16 December 2010 and in the undertakings given by the Council representative in its letter of 1 December 2010. The Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down the rules and general principles concerning mechanisms for control by Member States of the Commission’s exercise of implementing power is expected to enter into force on 1st March 2011. As noted in the Commission's proposal of 9 March 2010[4], the adaptation of existing basic acts provided for in Article 13[5] will not operate, however, for a significant number of basic acts in the field of the common commercial policy. These basic acts were not previously subject to the procedures laid down in Council Decision 1999/468/EC of 28 June 1999. The current proposal addresses procedures for the control or adoption of acts in twenty four basic acts in the field of the common commercial policy not previously subject to Council Decision 1999/468/EC. There is another act which would in principle fall under the scope of this proposal. This act is Council Regulation (EEC) No 1842/71 of 21 June 1971 on protective measures provided for in the additional protocol to the Association Agreement between the EEC and Turkey and to the interim agreement between the EEC and Turkey[6]. However, versions of this act are not available in a significant number of official languages of the Union. As a consequence, amending the act also requires the establishment of versions of the Regulation in the languages which are currently unavailable. Rather than fold this exercise into this proposal, it is considered preferable that the Regulation be replaced. At the time of replacement, the Commission will address the relevant decision-making issues (which are otherwise very similar to those arising for Council Regulation (EEC) No 2841/72 of 19 December 1972 on the safeguard measures provided for in the Agreement between the European Economic Community and the Swiss Confederation). The Commission will take the necessary steps in this regard as soon as possible.
Revised version (Article 10 Transitional surveillance mechanism):
1. For the period from 1 January 2008 to 30 September 2015, imports of products of tariff headings 1704 90 99, 1806 10 30, 1806 10 90, 2106 90 59, 2106 90 98 originating in regions or states listed in Annex I shall be subject to the surveillance mechanism provided for in Article 308d of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 of 2 July 1993 laying down provisions for the implementation of Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 establishing the Community Customs Code ( 13 ). 2. On the basis of that surveillance, the Commission shall check whether there is a cumulative increase of imports of one or more of those products originating in a particular region by more than 20 % in volume during a period of twelve consecutive months compared to the average of the yearly imports over the previous three twelve-month periods. 3. If the level referred to in paragraph 2 is reached, the Commission shall analyse the pattern of trade, the economic justification and the sugar content of such imports. If the Commission concludes that such imports are used to circumvent the tariff rate quotas, the transitional arrangements and the special safeguard mechanism provided for in Articles 7, 8 and 9, it may suspend the application of Article 3(1) to imports of products of tariff headings 1704 90 99, 1806 10 30, 1806 10 90, 2106 90 59, 2106 90 98 originating in regions or states listed in Annex I which are not least-developed countries listed in Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 980/2005 until the end of the marketing year concerned. 4. The Commission shall adopt detailed rules relating to the management of this system and to suspension decisions in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 21(5).
Article 11 Definitions
For the purposes of this Chapter: (a) ‘Community industry’ shall mean the Community producers as a whole of the like or directly competitive products operating within the territory of the Community, or those Community producers whose collective output of the like or directly competitive product constitutes a major proportion of the total Community production of those products; (b) ‘serious injury’ shall mean a significant overall impairment in the position of Community producers; (c) ‘threat of serious injury’ shall mean serious injury that is clearly imminent; (d) ‘disturbances’ shall mean disorders in a sector or industry; (e) ‘threat of disturbances’ shall mean disturbances that are clearly imminent.
Article 12 Principles
1. A safeguard measure may be imposed in accordance with the provisions set out in this Chapter where products originating in regions or states listed in Annex I are being imported in the Community in such increased quantities and under such conditions as to cause or threaten to cause any of the following: (a) serious injury to the Community industry; (b) disturbances in a sector of the economy, particularly where those disturbances produce major social problems or difficulties which could bring about serious deterioration in the economic situation of the Community; or (c) disturbances in the markets of agricultural products covered by Annex I of the WTO Agreement on Agriculture or mechanisms regulating those markets. 2. In cases where products originating in regions or states listed in Annex I are being imported into the Community in such increased quantities and under such conditions as to cause or threaten to cause disturbances in the economic situation of one or several of the Community's outermost regions, a safeguard measure may be imposed in accordance with the provisions set out in this Chapter.
Article 13 Determination of the conditions to impose safeguard measures
1. The determination of serious injury or a threat thereof shall cover inter alia the following factors: (a) the volume of imports, in particular where there has been a significant increase, either in absolute terms or relative to production or consumption in the Community; (b) the price of imports, in particular where there has been a significant price undercutting as compared with the price of a like product in the Community; (c) the consequent impact on Community producers as indicated by trends in certain economic factors such as production, capacity utilisation, stocks, sales, market share, the depression of prices or prevention of price increases which would normally have occurred, profits, return on capital employed, cash flow, and employment; (d) factors other than trends in imports which are causing or may have caused injury to the Community producers concerned. 2. The determination of disturbances or a threat thereof shall be based on objective factors, including the following elements: (a) the increase in the volume of imports in absolute or relative terms to Community production and to imports from other sources; and (b) the effect of such imports on prices; or (c) the effect of such imports on the situation of the Community industry or the economic sector concerned, including inter alia on the levels of sales, production, financial situation and employment. 3. In determining whether imports are made under such conditions as to cause or threaten to cause disturbances in the markets of agricultural products or mechanisms regulating those markets, including regulations creating Common Market Organisations, all relevant objective factors must be taken into consideration, including one or more of the following elements: (a) the volume of imports as compared to previous calendar or marketing years' levels, as the case may be, internal production and consumption, and future levels planned in accordance with the reform of the Common Market Organisations; (b) the level of internal prices compared to the reference or target prices if applicable, and, if not applicable, compared to the average internal market prices during the same period of previous marketing years; (c) as of 1 October 2015, in the markets for products of tariff heading 1701: situations where the Community average market price of white sugar falls during two consecutive months below 80 % of the average Community market price for white sugar prevailing during the previous marketing year. 4. In determining whether the conditions referred to in paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 are met in the case of the Community's outermost regions, the analyses shall be restricted to the territory of the outermost region(s) concerned. Particular attention shall be paid to the size of the local industry, its financial situation and the situation of employment.
Article 14 Initiation of proceedings
1. An investigation shall be initiated upon request by a Member State or on the Commission's own initiative if it is apparent to the Commission that there is sufficient evidence to justify such initiation. 2. The Member States shall inform the Commission should trends in imports from any of the regions or states listed in Annex I appear to call for safeguard measures. That information shall include the evidence available, as determined on the basis of the criteria laid down in Article 13. The Commission shall pass that information on to all Member States within three working days. 3. Consultation with the Member States shall take place within eight working days of the Commission's sending the information to Member States as provided for in paragraph 2. Where, after consultation, it is apparent that there is sufficient evidence to justify the initiation of a proceeding, the Commission shall publish a notice in the Official Journal of the European Union. Initiation shall take place within one month of the receipt of information from a Member State. 4. If, after consulting the Member States, the Commission takes the view that the circumstances set out in Article 12 exist, it shall immediately notify the region or states listed in Annex I concerned of its intention to initiate an investigation. The notification may be accompanied by an invitation for consultations with the aim of clarifying the situation and arriving at a mutually satisfactory solution.
Amendment rationale: EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM 1. INTRODUCTION The entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon has led to significant changes both in the framework for the adoption of delegated and implementing acts and for the conduct of trade policy. As regards the adoption of delegated and implementing acts the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (hereinafter "the Treaty") clearly distinguishes between delegated and implementing acts. - The provisions of the Treaty on delegated acts, which are set out in Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, provide for the legislator to control the exercise of the Commission's powers by means of a right of revocation and/or a right of objection. - The provisions of the Treaty on implementing acts, which are set out in Article 291, do not provide any role for the European Parliament and the Council to control the Commission's exercise of implementing powers. Such control can only be exercised by the Member States. A legal framework is required to establish the mechanisms of such control. As regards trade policy, the Treaty of Lisbon makes the European Parliament co-legislator and its consent is required for the conclusion of agreements. On 9 March 2010 the Commission adopted a proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down the rules and general principles concerning mechanisms for control by Member States of the Commission’s exercise of implementing powers[1]. One of the key objectives of this proposal is to provide that the control of the Commission's exercise of its implementing powers is conducted not by the Council or the European Parliament but by the Member States as is required by Article 291 of the Treaty. In the proposal, this is achieved by the creation of procedures (the advisory and examination procedures) whereby the Commission's implementing acts are subject to control by the Member States combined with an automatic alignment[2] of existing procedures established under Council Decision 1999/468/EC of 28 June 1999 laying down the procedures for the exercise of implementing powers conferred on the Commission[3]. In this manner, the Commission's proposal will bring the exercise of control over the Commission's implementing acts in those areas where the procedures laid down in Council Decision 1999/468/EC apply in line with the requirements of Article 291 whereby it is the Member States and not the legislators that exercise such control. These main features were preserved in the text adopted in the first reading legislative resolution of the European Parliament on 16 December 2010 and in the undertakings given by the Council representative in its letter of 1 December 2010. The Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down the rules and general principles concerning mechanisms for control by Member States of the Commission’s exercise of implementing power is expected to enter into force on 1st March 2011. As noted in the Commission's proposal of 9 March 2010[4], the adaptation of existing basic acts provided for in Article 13[5] will not operate, however, for a significant number of basic acts in the field of the common commercial policy. These basic acts were not previously subject to the procedures laid down in Council Decision 1999/468/EC of 28 June 1999. The current proposal addresses procedures for the control or adoption of acts in twenty four basic acts in the field of the common commercial policy not previously subject to Council Decision 1999/468/EC. There is another act which would in principle fall under the scope of this proposal. This act is Council Regulation (EEC) No 1842/71 of 21 June 1971 on protective measures provided for in the additional protocol to the Association Agreement between the EEC and Turkey and to the interim agreement between the EEC and Turkey[6]. However, versions of this act are not available in a significant number of official languages of the Union. As a consequence, amending the act also requires the establishment of versions of the Regulation in the languages which are currently unavailable. Rather than fold this exercise into this proposal, it is considered preferable that the Regulation be replaced. At the time of replacement, the Commission will address the relevant decision-making issues (which are otherwise very similar to those arising for Council Regulation (EEC) No 2841/72 of 19 December 1972 on the safeguard measures provided for in the Agreement between the European Economic Community and the Swiss Confederation). The Commission will take the necessary steps in this regard as soon as possible.
Revised version (Article 14 Initiation of proceedings):
1. An investigation shall be initiated upon request by a Member State or on the Commission's own initiative if it is apparent to the Commission that there is sufficient evidence to justify such initiation. 2. The Member States shall inform the Commission should trends in imports from any of the regions or states listed in Annex I appear to call for safeguard measures. That information shall include the evidence available, as determined on the basis of the criteria laid down in Article 13. The Commission shall pass that information on to all Member States within three working days. 3. Where it is apparent that there is sufficient evidence to justify the initiation of a proceeding, the Commission shall publish a notice in the Official Journal of the European Union . Initiation shall take place within one month of the date of receipt of information from a Member State. The Commission shall provide information to the Member States concerning its analysis of the information normally within 21 days of the date on which the information was provided to the Commission. 4. If the Commission takes the view that the circumstances set out in Article 12 exist, it shall immediately notify the region or states listed in Annex I concerned of its intention to initiate an investigation. The notification may be accompanied by an invitation for consultations with the aim of clarifying the situation and arriving at a mutually satisfactory solution.
Article 15 The investigation
1. Following the initiation of the proceeding, the Commission shall commence an investigation. 2. The Commission may request Member States to supply information and Member States shall take whatever steps are necessary in order to give effect to any such request. Where that information is of general interest or where its transmission was requested by a Member State, the Commission shall forward it to all Member States provided it is not confidential; if it is confidential the Commission shall forward a non-confidential summary. 3. In the event of an investigation restricted to an outermost region, the Commission may request the competent local authorities to supply the information referred to in paragraph 2 via the Member State concerned. 4. The investigation shall, whenever possible, be concluded within six months of the initiation of the investigation. In exceptional circumstances, that time limit may be extended by a further period of three months.
Article 16 Imposition of provisional safeguard measures
1. Provisional safeguard measures shall be applied in critical circumstances where a delay would cause damage which it would be difficult to repair, pursuant to a preliminary determination that circumstances set out in Article 12 as appropriate exist. The Commission shall take such provisional measures after consultation with Member States or, in cases of extreme urgency, after informing the Member States. In the latter case, consultation shall take place within ten days of notification of the Member States of the action taken by the Commission. 2. In view of the particular situation of outermost regions and their vulnerability to any surge in imports, provisional safeguard measures shall be applied in proceedings that concern them where a preliminary determination has shown that imports have increased. In that case, the Commission shall inform Member States upon taking the measures and consultation shall take place within ten days of notification of the Member States of the action taken by the Commission. 3. Where a Member State requests immediate intervention by the Commission and where the conditions in paragraph 1 or 2 are met, the Commission shall take a decision within five working days of receiving the request. 4. The Commission shall immediately inform the Council and the Member States of any decision taken under paragraphs 1, 2 and 3. The Council, acting by a qualified majority, may decide differently within one month of having been informed by the Commission pursuant to this paragraph. 5. Provisional measures may take the form of an increase in the customs duty on the product concerned up to a level which does not exceed the customs duty applied to other WTO members, or tariff quotas. 6. Provisional measures shall not apply for more than 180 days. Where provisional measures are restricted to outermost regions, they may not apply for more than 200 days. 7. Should the provisional safeguard measures be repealed because the investigation shows that the conditions laid down in Articles 12 and 13 are not met, any duty collected as a result of those provisional measures shall be refunded automatically.
Amendment rationale: EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM 1. INTRODUCTION The entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon has led to significant changes both in the framework for the adoption of delegated and implementing acts and for the conduct of trade policy. As regards the adoption of delegated and implementing acts the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (hereinafter "the Treaty") clearly distinguishes between delegated and implementing acts. - The provisions of the Treaty on delegated acts, which are set out in Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, provide for the legislator to control the exercise of the Commission's powers by means of a right of revocation and/or a right of objection. - The provisions of the Treaty on implementing acts, which are set out in Article 291, do not provide any role for the European Parliament and the Council to control the Commission's exercise of implementing powers. Such control can only be exercised by the Member States. A legal framework is required to establish the mechanisms of such control. As regards trade policy, the Treaty of Lisbon makes the European Parliament co-legislator and its consent is required for the conclusion of agreements. On 9 March 2010 the Commission adopted a proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down the rules and general principles concerning mechanisms for control by Member States of the Commission’s exercise of implementing powers[1]. One of the key objectives of this proposal is to provide that the control of the Commission's exercise of its implementing powers is conducted not by the Council or the European Parliament but by the Member States as is required by Article 291 of the Treaty. In the proposal, this is achieved by the creation of procedures (the advisory and examination procedures) whereby the Commission's implementing acts are subject to control by the Member States combined with an automatic alignment[2] of existing procedures established under Council Decision 1999/468/EC of 28 June 1999 laying down the procedures for the exercise of implementing powers conferred on the Commission[3]. In this manner, the Commission's proposal will bring the exercise of control over the Commission's implementing acts in those areas where the procedures laid down in Council Decision 1999/468/EC apply in line with the requirements of Article 291 whereby it is the Member States and not the legislators that exercise such control. These main features were preserved in the text adopted in the first reading legislative resolution of the European Parliament on 16 December 2010 and in the undertakings given by the Council representative in its letter of 1 December 2010. The Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down the rules and general principles concerning mechanisms for control by Member States of the Commission’s exercise of implementing power is expected to enter into force on 1st March 2011. As noted in the Commission's proposal of 9 March 2010[4], the adaptation of existing basic acts provided for in Article 13[5] will not operate, however, for a significant number of basic acts in the field of the common commercial policy. These basic acts were not previously subject to the procedures laid down in Council Decision 1999/468/EC of 28 June 1999. The current proposal addresses procedures for the control or adoption of acts in twenty four basic acts in the field of the common commercial policy not previously subject to Council Decision 1999/468/EC. There is another act which would in principle fall under the scope of this proposal. This act is Council Regulation (EEC) No 1842/71 of 21 June 1971 on protective measures provided for in the additional protocol to the Association Agreement between the EEC and Turkey and to the interim agreement between the EEC and Turkey[6]. However, versions of this act are not available in a significant number of official languages of the Union. As a consequence, amending the act also requires the establishment of versions of the Regulation in the languages which are currently unavailable. Rather than fold this exercise into this proposal, it is considered preferable that the Regulation be replaced. At the time of replacement, the Commission will address the relevant decision-making issues (which are otherwise very similar to those arising for Council Regulation (EEC) No 2841/72 of 19 December 1972 on the safeguard measures provided for in the Agreement between the European Economic Community and the Swiss Confederation). The Commission will take the necessary steps in this regard as soon as possible.
Revised version (Article 16 Imposition of provisional safeguard measures):
1. Provisional safeguard measures shall be applied in critical circumstances where a delay would cause damage which it would be difficult to repair, pursuant to a preliminary determination that circumstances set out in Article 12 as appropriate exist. Provisional measures shall be adopted in accordance with the advisory procedure referred to in Article 21(4), or in cases of urgency, in accordance with Article 21(6). 2. In view of the particular situation of outermost regions and their vulnerability to any surge in imports, provisional safeguard measures shall be applied in proceedings that concern them where a preliminary determination has shown that imports have increased. Provisional measures shall be adopted in accordance with the advisory procedure referred to in Article 21(4), or, in cases of urgency, in accordance with Article 21(6). 3. Where a Member State requests immediate intervention by the Commission and where the conditions in paragraph 1 or 2 are met, the Commission shall take a decision within five working days of receiving the request. 5. Provisional measures may take the form of an increase in the customs duty on the product concerned up to a level which does not exceed the customs duty applied to other WTO members, or tariff quotas. 6. Provisional measures shall not apply for more than 180 days. Where provisional measures are restricted to outermost regions, they may not apply for more than 200 days. 7. Should the provisional safeguard measures be repealed because the investigation shows that the conditions laid down in Articles 12 and 13 are not met, any duty collected as a result of those provisional measures shall be refunded automatically.
Article 17 Termination of investigation and proceeding without measures
Where bilateral safeguard measures are deemed unnecessary and there is no objection within the Advisory Committee referred to in Article 21, the investigation and proceeding shall be terminated by Commission decision. In all other cases, the Commission shall immediately submit to the Council a report on the results of the consultation, together with a proposal for a Council Regulation terminating the proceeding. The proceeding shall be deemed terminated if, within one month, the Council acting by qualified majority has not decided otherwise.
Amendment rationale: EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM 1. INTRODUCTION The entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon has led to significant changes both in the framework for the adoption of delegated and implementing acts and for the conduct of trade policy. As regards the adoption of delegated and implementing acts the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (hereinafter "the Treaty") clearly distinguishes between delegated and implementing acts. - The provisions of the Treaty on delegated acts, which are set out in Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, provide for the legislator to control the exercise of the Commission's powers by means of a right of revocation and/or a right of objection. - The provisions of the Treaty on implementing acts, which are set out in Article 291, do not provide any role for the European Parliament and the Council to control the Commission's exercise of implementing powers. Such control can only be exercised by the Member States. A legal framework is required to establish the mechanisms of such control. As regards trade policy, the Treaty of Lisbon makes the European Parliament co-legislator and its consent is required for the conclusion of agreements. On 9 March 2010 the Commission adopted a proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down the rules and general principles concerning mechanisms for control by Member States of the Commission’s exercise of implementing powers[1]. One of the key objectives of this proposal is to provide that the control of the Commission's exercise of its implementing powers is conducted not by the Council or the European Parliament but by the Member States as is required by Article 291 of the Treaty. In the proposal, this is achieved by the creation of procedures (the advisory and examination procedures) whereby the Commission's implementing acts are subject to control by the Member States combined with an automatic alignment[2] of existing procedures established under Council Decision 1999/468/EC of 28 June 1999 laying down the procedures for the exercise of implementing powers conferred on the Commission[3]. In this manner, the Commission's proposal will bring the exercise of control over the Commission's implementing acts in those areas where the procedures laid down in Council Decision 1999/468/EC apply in line with the requirements of Article 291 whereby it is the Member States and not the legislators that exercise such control. These main features were preserved in the text adopted in the first reading legislative resolution of the European Parliament on 16 December 2010 and in the undertakings given by the Council representative in its letter of 1 December 2010. The Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down the rules and general principles concerning mechanisms for control by Member States of the Commission’s exercise of implementing power is expected to enter into force on 1st March 2011. As noted in the Commission's proposal of 9 March 2010[4], the adaptation of existing basic acts provided for in Article 13[5] will not operate, however, for a significant number of basic acts in the field of the common commercial policy. These basic acts were not previously subject to the procedures laid down in Council Decision 1999/468/EC of 28 June 1999. The current proposal addresses procedures for the control or adoption of acts in twenty four basic acts in the field of the common commercial policy not previously subject to Council Decision 1999/468/EC. There is another act which would in principle fall under the scope of this proposal. This act is Council Regulation (EEC) No 1842/71 of 21 June 1971 on protective measures provided for in the additional protocol to the Association Agreement between the EEC and Turkey and to the interim agreement between the EEC and Turkey[6]. However, versions of this act are not available in a significant number of official languages of the Union. As a consequence, amending the act also requires the establishment of versions of the Regulation in the languages which are currently unavailable. Rather than fold this exercise into this proposal, it is considered preferable that the Regulation be replaced. At the time of replacement, the Commission will address the relevant decision-making issues (which are otherwise very similar to those arising for Council Regulation (EEC) No 2841/72 of 19 December 1972 on the safeguard measures provided for in the Agreement between the European Economic Community and the Swiss Confederation). The Commission will take the necessary steps in this regard as soon as possible.
Revised version (Article 17 Termination of investigation and proceeding without measures):
Where bilateral safeguard measures are deemed unnecessary, the investigation and proceeding shall be terminated in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 21(5).
Article 18 Imposition of definitive measures
1. Where the facts as finally established show that the circumstances set out in Article 12, as appropriate, are met, the Commission shall request consultations with the region or state concerned meeting in the context of the appropriate institutional arrangement set up in the relevant agreements permitting a region or state to be included in Annex 1 with a view to seeking a mutually acceptable solution. 2. If the consultations referred to in paragraph 1 do not lead to a mutually satisfactory solution within thirty days of the matter's being referred to the region or state concerned, a decision to impose definitive bilateral safeguard measures shall be taken by the Commission, in consultation with Member States, within twenty working days of the end of the consultation period. 3. Any decision taken by the Commission pursuant to this Article shall be communicated to the Council and Member States. Any Member State may, within ten working days of such communication, refer the decision to the Council. 4. If a Member State refers the Commission's decision to the Council, the Council, acting by a qualified majority, may confirm, amend or revoke the decision. If within one month of the referral of the matter the Council has not taken a decision, the decision taken by the Commission shall be deemed confirmed. 5. Definitive measures may take one of the following forms: — a suspension of the further reduction of the rate of import duty for the product concerned originating in the region or state concerned; — an increase in the customs duty on the product concerned up to a level which does not exceed the customs duty applied to other WTO members; — a tariff quota. 6. No bilateral safeguard measure shall be applied on the same product from the same region or state less than one year after previous such measures have lapsed or been removed.
Amendment rationale: EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM 1. INTRODUCTION The entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon has led to significant changes both in the framework for the adoption of delegated and implementing acts and for the conduct of trade policy. As regards the adoption of delegated and implementing acts the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (hereinafter "the Treaty") clearly distinguishes between delegated and implementing acts. - The provisions of the Treaty on delegated acts, which are set out in Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, provide for the legislator to control the exercise of the Commission's powers by means of a right of revocation and/or a right of objection. - The provisions of the Treaty on implementing acts, which are set out in Article 291, do not provide any role for the European Parliament and the Council to control the Commission's exercise of implementing powers. Such control can only be exercised by the Member States. A legal framework is required to establish the mechanisms of such control. As regards trade policy, the Treaty of Lisbon makes the European Parliament co-legislator and its consent is required for the conclusion of agreements. On 9 March 2010 the Commission adopted a proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down the rules and general principles concerning mechanisms for control by Member States of the Commission’s exercise of implementing powers[1]. One of the key objectives of this proposal is to provide that the control of the Commission's exercise of its implementing powers is conducted not by the Council or the European Parliament but by the Member States as is required by Article 291 of the Treaty. In the proposal, this is achieved by the creation of procedures (the advisory and examination procedures) whereby the Commission's implementing acts are subject to control by the Member States combined with an automatic alignment[2] of existing procedures established under Council Decision 1999/468/EC of 28 June 1999 laying down the procedures for the exercise of implementing powers conferred on the Commission[3]. In this manner, the Commission's proposal will bring the exercise of control over the Commission's implementing acts in those areas where the procedures laid down in Council Decision 1999/468/EC apply in line with the requirements of Article 291 whereby it is the Member States and not the legislators that exercise such control. These main features were preserved in the text adopted in the first reading legislative resolution of the European Parliament on 16 December 2010 and in the undertakings given by the Council representative in its letter of 1 December 2010. The Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down the rules and general principles concerning mechanisms for control by Member States of the Commission’s exercise of implementing power is expected to enter into force on 1st March 2011. As noted in the Commission's proposal of 9 March 2010[4], the adaptation of existing basic acts provided for in Article 13[5] will not operate, however, for a significant number of basic acts in the field of the common commercial policy. These basic acts were not previously subject to the procedures laid down in Council Decision 1999/468/EC of 28 June 1999. The current proposal addresses procedures for the control or adoption of acts in twenty four basic acts in the field of the common commercial policy not previously subject to Council Decision 1999/468/EC. There is another act which would in principle fall under the scope of this proposal. This act is Council Regulation (EEC) No 1842/71 of 21 June 1971 on protective measures provided for in the additional protocol to the Association Agreement between the EEC and Turkey and to the interim agreement between the EEC and Turkey[6]. However, versions of this act are not available in a significant number of official languages of the Union. As a consequence, amending the act also requires the establishment of versions of the Regulation in the languages which are currently unavailable. Rather than fold this exercise into this proposal, it is considered preferable that the Regulation be replaced. At the time of replacement, the Commission will address the relevant decision-making issues (which are otherwise very similar to those arising for Council Regulation (EEC) No 2841/72 of 19 December 1972 on the safeguard measures provided for in the Agreement between the European Economic Community and the Swiss Confederation). The Commission will take the necessary steps in this regard as soon as possible.
Revised version (Article 18 Imposition of definitive measures):
1. Where the facts as finally established show that the circumstances set out in Article 12, as appropriate, are met, the Commission shall request consultations with the region or state concerned meeting in the context of the appropriate institutional arrangement set up in the relevant agreements permitting a region or state to be included in Annex 1 with a view to seeking a mutually acceptable solution. 2. If the consultations referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article do not lead to a mutually satisfactory solution within 30 days of the matter being referred to the region or state concerned, a decision to impose definitive bilateral safeguard measures shall be taken by the Commission in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 21(5) within 20 working days of the end of the consultation period. 5. Definitive measures may take one of the following forms: — a suspension of the further reduction of the rate of import duty for the product concerned originating in the region or state concerned; — an increase in the customs duty on the product concerned up to a level which does not exceed the customs duty applied to other WTO members; — a tariff quota. 6. No bilateral safeguard measure shall be applied on the same product from the same region or state less than one year after previous such measures have lapsed or been removed.
Article 19 Duration and review of safeguard measures
1. A safeguard measure shall remain in force only for such period of time as may be necessary to prevent or remedy the serious injury or disturbances. That period shall not exceed two years, unless it is extended under paragraph 2. Where the measure is restricted to one or several of the outermost region(s) of the Community, the period of application may not exceed four years. 2. The initial period of duration of a safeguard measure may exceptionally be extended provided it is determined that the safeguard measure continues to be necessary to prevent or remedy serious injury or disturbances. 3. Extensions shall be adopted in accordance with the procedures of this Regulation applying to investigations and using the same procedures as the initial measures. The total duration of a safeguard measure may not exceed four years, including any provisional measure. In the case of a measure restricted to outermost regions, that limit shall be extended to eight years. 4. If the duration of a safeguard measure exceeds one year, it shall be progressively liberalised at regular intervals during its period of application, including any extension. Consultations with the region or state concerned shall be held periodically in the relevant institutional bodies of the agreements, with a view to establishing a timetable for their abolition as soon as circumstances permit.
Article 20 Surveillance measures
1. Where the trend in imports of a product originating in an ACP State is such that they could cause one of the situations referred to in Article 12, imports of that product may be subject to prior Community surveillance. 2. The decision to impose surveillance shall be taken by the Commission. Any decision taken by the Commission pursuant to this Article shall be communicated to the Council and Member States. Any Member State may, within ten working days of such communication, refer the decision to the Council. If a Member State refers the Commission's decision to the Council, the Council, acting by a qualified majority, may confirm, amend or revoke the decision. If within one month of the referral of the matter, the Council has not taken a decision, the decision taken by the Commission shall be deemed confirmed. 3. Surveillance measures shall have a limited period of validity. Unless otherwise provided, they shall cease to be valid at the end of the second six-month period following the first six months after the measures were introduced. 4. Surveillance measures may be restricted to the territory of one or more Community outermost region(s) where necessary. 5. The decision to impose surveillance measures shall be communicated immediately to the appropriate institutional body set up in the relevant agreements permitting a region or state to be included in Annex I for information.
Amendment rationale: EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM 1. INTRODUCTION The entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon has led to significant changes both in the framework for the adoption of delegated and implementing acts and for the conduct of trade policy. As regards the adoption of delegated and implementing acts the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (hereinafter "the Treaty") clearly distinguishes between delegated and implementing acts. - The provisions of the Treaty on delegated acts, which are set out in Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, provide for the legislator to control the exercise of the Commission's powers by means of a right of revocation and/or a right of objection. - The provisions of the Treaty on implementing acts, which are set out in Article 291, do not provide any role for the European Parliament and the Council to control the Commission's exercise of implementing powers. Such control can only be exercised by the Member States. A legal framework is required to establish the mechanisms of such control. As regards trade policy, the Treaty of Lisbon makes the European Parliament co-legislator and its consent is required for the conclusion of agreements. On 9 March 2010 the Commission adopted a proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down the rules and general principles concerning mechanisms for control by Member States of the Commission’s exercise of implementing powers[1]. One of the key objectives of this proposal is to provide that the control of the Commission's exercise of its implementing powers is conducted not by the Council or the European Parliament but by the Member States as is required by Article 291 of the Treaty. In the proposal, this is achieved by the creation of procedures (the advisory and examination procedures) whereby the Commission's implementing acts are subject to control by the Member States combined with an automatic alignment[2] of existing procedures established under Council Decision 1999/468/EC of 28 June 1999 laying down the procedures for the exercise of implementing powers conferred on the Commission[3]. In this manner, the Commission's proposal will bring the exercise of control over the Commission's implementing acts in those areas where the procedures laid down in Council Decision 1999/468/EC apply in line with the requirements of Article 291 whereby it is the Member States and not the legislators that exercise such control. These main features were preserved in the text adopted in the first reading legislative resolution of the European Parliament on 16 December 2010 and in the undertakings given by the Council representative in its letter of 1 December 2010. The Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down the rules and general principles concerning mechanisms for control by Member States of the Commission’s exercise of implementing power is expected to enter into force on 1st March 2011. As noted in the Commission's proposal of 9 March 2010[4], the adaptation of existing basic acts provided for in Article 13[5] will not operate, however, for a significant number of basic acts in the field of the common commercial policy. These basic acts were not previously subject to the procedures laid down in Council Decision 1999/468/EC of 28 June 1999. The current proposal addresses procedures for the control or adoption of acts in twenty four basic acts in the field of the common commercial policy not previously subject to Council Decision 1999/468/EC. There is another act which would in principle fall under the scope of this proposal. This act is Council Regulation (EEC) No 1842/71 of 21 June 1971 on protective measures provided for in the additional protocol to the Association Agreement between the EEC and Turkey and to the interim agreement between the EEC and Turkey[6]. However, versions of this act are not available in a significant number of official languages of the Union. As a consequence, amending the act also requires the establishment of versions of the Regulation in the languages which are currently unavailable. Rather than fold this exercise into this proposal, it is considered preferable that the Regulation be replaced. At the time of replacement, the Commission will address the relevant decision-making issues (which are otherwise very similar to those arising for Council Regulation (EEC) No 2841/72 of 19 December 1972 on the safeguard measures provided for in the Agreement between the European Economic Community and the Swiss Confederation). The Commission will take the necessary steps in this regard as soon as possible.
Revised version (Article 20 Surveillance measures):
1. Where the trend in imports of a product originating in an ACP State is such that they could cause one of the situations referred to in Article 12, imports of that product may be subject to prior Community surveillance. 2. The decision to impose surveillance shall be taken by the Commission in accordance with the advisory procedure referred to in Article 21(4). 3. Surveillance measures shall have a limited period of validity. Unless otherwise provided, they shall cease to be valid at the end of the second six-month period following the first six months after the measures were introduced. 4. Surveillance measures may be restricted to the territory of one or more Community outermost region(s) where necessary. 5. The decision to impose surveillance measures shall be communicated immediately to the appropriate institutional body set up in the relevant agreements permitting a region or state to be included in Annex I for information.
Article 21 Consultations
The competent consultative committee for the purposes of this Chapter shall be the Advisory Committee provided for in Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 3285/94 of 22 December 1994 on the common rules for imports ( 15 ). In the case of products falling under CN code 1701, the competent committee shall be assisted by the committee established pursuant to Article 39 of Regulation (EC) No 318/2006.
Amendment rationale: EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM 1. INTRODUCTION The entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon has led to significant changes both in the framework for the adoption of delegated and implementing acts and for the conduct of trade policy. As regards the adoption of delegated and implementing acts the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (hereinafter "the Treaty") clearly distinguishes between delegated and implementing acts. - The provisions of the Treaty on delegated acts, which are set out in Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, provide for the legislator to control the exercise of the Commission's powers by means of a right of revocation and/or a right of objection. - The provisions of the Treaty on implementing acts, which are set out in Article 291, do not provide any role for the European Parliament and the Council to control the Commission's exercise of implementing powers. Such control can only be exercised by the Member States. A legal framework is required to establish the mechanisms of such control. As regards trade policy, the Treaty of Lisbon makes the European Parliament co-legislator and its consent is required for the conclusion of agreements. On 9 March 2010 the Commission adopted a proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down the rules and general principles concerning mechanisms for control by Member States of the Commission’s exercise of implementing powers[1]. One of the key objectives of this proposal is to provide that the control of the Commission's exercise of its implementing powers is conducted not by the Council or the European Parliament but by the Member States as is required by Article 291 of the Treaty. In the proposal, this is achieved by the creation of procedures (the advisory and examination procedures) whereby the Commission's implementing acts are subject to control by the Member States combined with an automatic alignment[2] of existing procedures established under Council Decision 1999/468/EC of 28 June 1999 laying down the procedures for the exercise of implementing powers conferred on the Commission[3]. In this manner, the Commission's proposal will bring the exercise of control over the Commission's implementing acts in those areas where the procedures laid down in Council Decision 1999/468/EC apply in line with the requirements of Article 291 whereby it is the Member States and not the legislators that exercise such control. These main features were preserved in the text adopted in the first reading legislative resolution of the European Parliament on 16 December 2010 and in the undertakings given by the Council representative in its letter of 1 December 2010. The Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down the rules and general principles concerning mechanisms for control by Member States of the Commission’s exercise of implementing power is expected to enter into force on 1st March 2011. As noted in the Commission's proposal of 9 March 2010[4], the adaptation of existing basic acts provided for in Article 13[5] will not operate, however, for a significant number of basic acts in the field of the common commercial policy. These basic acts were not previously subject to the procedures laid down in Council Decision 1999/468/EC of 28 June 1999. The current proposal addresses procedures for the control or adoption of acts in twenty four basic acts in the field of the common commercial policy not previously subject to Council Decision 1999/468/EC. There is another act which would in principle fall under the scope of this proposal. This act is Council Regulation (EEC) No 1842/71 of 21 June 1971 on protective measures provided for in the additional protocol to the Association Agreement between the EEC and Turkey and to the interim agreement between the EEC and Turkey[6]. However, versions of this act are not available in a significant number of official languages of the Union. As a consequence, amending the act also requires the establishment of versions of the Regulation in the languages which are currently unavailable. Rather than fold this exercise into this proposal, it is considered preferable that the Regulation be replaced. At the time of replacement, the Commission will address the relevant decision-making issues (which are otherwise very similar to those arising for Council Regulation (EEC) No 2841/72 of 19 December 1972 on the safeguard measures provided for in the Agreement between the European Economic Community and the Swiss Confederation). The Commission will take the necessary steps in this regard as soon as possible.
Article 22 Exceptional measures with limited territorial application
Where it emerges that the conditions laid down for the adoption of bilateral safeguard measures are met in one or more Member States, the Commission may, after having examined alternative solutions, exceptionally, and in accordance with Article 134 of the Treaty, authorise the application of surveillance or safeguard measures restricted to the Member State or Member States concerned if it considers that such measures applied at that level are more appropriate than measures applied throughout the Community. Those measures must be strictly limited in time and must disrupt the operation of the internal market as little as possible.
Article 23 Adaptation to technical developments
This Regulation shall be amended in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 24(3) in order to make any technical amendments required as a result of differences between this regulation and agreements signed with provisional application or concluded in accordance with Article 300 of the Treaty with the regions or states listed in Annex I.
Amendment rationale: EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM 1. INTRODUCTION The entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon has led to significant changes both in the framework for the adoption of delegated and implementing acts and for the conduct of trade policy. As regards the adoption of delegated and implementing acts the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (hereinafter "the Treaty") clearly distinguishes between delegated and implementing acts. - The provisions of the Treaty on delegated acts, which are set out in Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, provide for the legislator to control the exercise of the Commission's powers by means of a right of revocation and/or a right of objection. - The provisions of the Treaty on implementing acts, which are set out in Article 291, do not provide any role for the European Parliament and the Council to control the Commission's exercise of implementing powers. Such control can only be exercised by the Member States. A legal framework is required to establish the mechanisms of such control. As regards trade policy, the Treaty of Lisbon makes the European Parliament co-legislator and its consent is required for the conclusion of agreements. On 9 March 2010 the Commission adopted a proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down the rules and general principles concerning mechanisms for control by Member States of the Commission’s exercise of implementing powers[1]. One of the key objectives of this proposal is to provide that the control of the Commission's exercise of its implementing powers is conducted not by the Council or the European Parliament but by the Member States as is required by Article 291 of the Treaty. In the proposal, this is achieved by the creation of procedures (the advisory and examination procedures) whereby the Commission's implementing acts are subject to control by the Member States combined with an automatic alignment[2] of existing procedures established under Council Decision 1999/468/EC of 28 June 1999 laying down the procedures for the exercise of implementing powers conferred on the Commission[3]. In this manner, the Commission's proposal will bring the exercise of control over the Commission's implementing acts in those areas where the procedures laid down in Council Decision 1999/468/EC apply in line with the requirements of Article 291 whereby it is the Member States and not the legislators that exercise such control. These main features were preserved in the text adopted in the first reading legislative resolution of the European Parliament on 16 December 2010 and in the undertakings given by the Council representative in its letter of 1 December 2010. The Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down the rules and general principles concerning mechanisms for control by Member States of the Commission’s exercise of implementing power is expected to enter into force on 1st March 2011. As noted in the Commission's proposal of 9 March 2010[4], the adaptation of existing basic acts provided for in Article 13[5] will not operate, however, for a significant number of basic acts in the field of the common commercial policy. These basic acts were not previously subject to the procedures laid down in Council Decision 1999/468/EC of 28 June 1999. The current proposal addresses procedures for the control or adoption of acts in twenty four basic acts in the field of the common commercial policy not previously subject to Council Decision 1999/468/EC. There is another act which would in principle fall under the scope of this proposal. This act is Council Regulation (EEC) No 1842/71 of 21 June 1971 on protective measures provided for in the additional protocol to the Association Agreement between the EEC and Turkey and to the interim agreement between the EEC and Turkey[6]. However, versions of this act are not available in a significant number of official languages of the Union. As a consequence, amending the act also requires the establishment of versions of the Regulation in the languages which are currently unavailable. Rather than fold this exercise into this proposal, it is considered preferable that the Regulation be replaced. At the time of replacement, the Commission will address the relevant decision-making issues (which are otherwise very similar to those arising for Council Regulation (EEC) No 2841/72 of 19 December 1972 on the safeguard measures provided for in the Agreement between the European Economic Community and the Swiss Confederation). The Commission will take the necessary steps in this regard as soon as possible.
Revised version (Article 23 Adaptation to technical developments):
The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 24a of this Regulation concerning technical amendments to Article 5 and Articles 8 to 22 which may be required as a result of differences between this Regulation and agreements signed with provisional application or concluded in accordance with Article 218 TFEU with the regions or states listed in Annex I to this Regulation.
Article 24 Committee
1. The Commission shall be assisted by the EPA Implementation Committee. 2. Where reference is made to this paragraph, Articles 3 and 7 of Decision 1999/468/EC shall apply. 3. Where reference is made to this paragraph, Articles 5 and 7 of Decision 1999/468/EC shall apply. 4. The period laid down in Article 5(6) of Decision 1999/468/EC shall be set at three months.
Amendment rationale: EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM 1. INTRODUCTION The entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon has led to significant changes both in the framework for the adoption of delegated and implementing acts and for the conduct of trade policy. As regards the adoption of delegated and implementing acts the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (hereinafter "the Treaty") clearly distinguishes between delegated and implementing acts. - The provisions of the Treaty on delegated acts, which are set out in Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, provide for the legislator to control the exercise of the Commission's powers by means of a right of revocation and/or a right of objection. - The provisions of the Treaty on implementing acts, which are set out in Article 291, do not provide any role for the European Parliament and the Council to control the Commission's exercise of implementing powers. Such control can only be exercised by the Member States. A legal framework is required to establish the mechanisms of such control. As regards trade policy, the Treaty of Lisbon makes the European Parliament co-legislator and its consent is required for the conclusion of agreements. On 9 March 2010 the Commission adopted a proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down the rules and general principles concerning mechanisms for control by Member States of the Commission’s exercise of implementing powers[1]. One of the key objectives of this proposal is to provide that the control of the Commission's exercise of its implementing powers is conducted not by the Council or the European Parliament but by the Member States as is required by Article 291 of the Treaty. In the proposal, this is achieved by the creation of procedures (the advisory and examination procedures) whereby the Commission's implementing acts are subject to control by the Member States combined with an automatic alignment[2] of existing procedures established under Council Decision 1999/468/EC of 28 June 1999 laying down the procedures for the exercise of implementing powers conferred on the Commission[3]. In this manner, the Commission's proposal will bring the exercise of control over the Commission's implementing acts in those areas where the procedures laid down in Council Decision 1999/468/EC apply in line with the requirements of Article 291 whereby it is the Member States and not the legislators that exercise such control. These main features were preserved in the text adopted in the first reading legislative resolution of the European Parliament on 16 December 2010 and in the undertakings given by the Council representative in its letter of 1 December 2010. The Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down the rules and general principles concerning mechanisms for control by Member States of the Commission’s exercise of implementing power is expected to enter into force on 1st March 2011. As noted in the Commission's proposal of 9 March 2010[4], the adaptation of existing basic acts provided for in Article 13[5] will not operate, however, for a significant number of basic acts in the field of the common commercial policy. These basic acts were not previously subject to the procedures laid down in Council Decision 1999/468/EC of 28 June 1999. The current proposal addresses procedures for the control or adoption of acts in twenty four basic acts in the field of the common commercial policy not previously subject to Council Decision 1999/468/EC. There is another act which would in principle fall under the scope of this proposal. This act is Council Regulation (EEC) No 1842/71 of 21 June 1971 on protective measures provided for in the additional protocol to the Association Agreement between the EEC and Turkey and to the interim agreement between the EEC and Turkey[6]. However, versions of this act are not available in a significant number of official languages of the Union. As a consequence, amending the act also requires the establishment of versions of the Regulation in the languages which are currently unavailable. Rather than fold this exercise into this proposal, it is considered preferable that the Regulation be replaced. At the time of replacement, the Commission will address the relevant decision-making issues (which are otherwise very similar to those arising for Council Regulation (EEC) No 2841/72 of 19 December 1972 on the safeguard measures provided for in the Agreement between the European Economic Community and the Swiss Confederation). The Commission will take the necessary steps in this regard as soon as possible.
Article 25 Amendments
Article 1(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1964/2005 shall be deleted.
Article 26 Repeal
Regulations (EC) No 2285/2002 and (EC) No 2286/2002 shall be repealed.
Article 27 Entry into force
This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union . It shall apply from 1 January 2008. This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.