Article 1 Subject matter
This Directive lays down rules for the taking-up and pursuit of activities carried out by institutions for occupational retirement provision (IORPs).
Article 2 Scope
1. This Directive shall apply to IORPs. Where, in accordance with national law, IORPs do not have legal personality, Member States shall apply this Directive either to those IORPs or, subject to paragraph 2, to those authorised entities responsible for operating them and acting on their behalf. 2. This Directive shall not apply to: (a) institutions operating social security schemes which are covered by Regulations (EC) No 883/2004 ( 9 ) and (EC) No 987/2009 ( 10 ) of the European Parliament and of the Council; (b) institutions which are covered by Directives 2009/65/EC ( 11 ) , 2009/138/EC, 2011/61/EU ( 12 ) , 2013/36/EU ( 13 ) and 2014/65/EU ( 14 ) of the European Parliament and of the Council; (c) institutions which operate on a pay-as-you-go basis; (d) institutions where employees of the sponsoring undertaking have no legal rights to benefits and where the sponsoring undertaking can redeem the assets at any time and not necessarily meet its obligations for payment of retirement benefits; (e) companies using book-reserve schemes with a view to paying out retirement benefits to their employees.
Amendment rationale: CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL Reasons for and objectives of the proposal The establishment of a European Single Access Point (ESAP) by 2024 is a flagship action of the Capital Markets Union (CMU) Action Plan adopted by the European Commission in September 2020 1 . ESAP will contribute to the achievement of the CMU’s objectives by providing EU-wide access to information published by entities that is relevant to capital markets, financial services and sustainable finance, i.e. mainly information about their economic activities and products. ESAP will provide access to this information in an efficient and non-discriminatory manner. Information about entities’ activities and products is essential for decision-making by providers of capital. ESAP will contribute to further integrating the financial services and capital markets in the single market, to allocating capital more efficiently across the EU and promoting the development of smaller national capital markets and economies by giving them greater visibility. ESAP will also allow non-listed entities including Small and Medium-Sized enterprises (SMEs) to make available information on a voluntary basis. This will facilitate their access to capital. This proposal is part of a package comprised of: · a proposal for a Regulation establishing a European Single Access Point; · a proposal for a Directive amending certain Directives (this proposal); and · a proposal for a Regulation amending certain Regulations. Amendments to certain Directives are necessary to achieve the above objectives to contribute to the integration of the single market, particularly as regards the collection of information to be made available to ESAP. 
Revised version (Article 2 Scope):
1. This Directive shall apply to IORPs. Where, in accordance with national law, IORPs do not have legal personality, Member States shall apply this Directive either to those IORPs or, subject to paragraph 2, to those authorised entities responsible for operating them and acting on their behalf.
Article 3 Application to IORPs operating social security schemes
IORPs which also operate compulsory employment-related pension schemes which are considered to be social security schemes covered by Regulations (EC) No 883/2004 and (EC) No 987/2009 shall be covered by this Directive in respect of their non-compulsory occupational retirement provision business. In that case, the liabilities and corresponding assets shall be ring-fenced and it shall not be possible to transfer them to the compulsory pension schemes which are considered as social security schemes or vice versa.
Article 4 Optional application to institutions covered by Directive 2009/138/EC
Home Member States may choose to apply the provisions of Articles 9 to 14, Articles 19 to 22, Article 23(1) and (2), and Articles 24 to 58 of this Directive to the occupational retirement provision business of life insurance undertakings in accordance with points (a)(i) to (iii) of Article 2(3) and points (b)(ii) to (iv) of Article 2(3) of Directive 2009/138/EC. In that case, all assets and liabilities corresponding to the occupational retirement provision business shall be ring-fenced, managed and organised separately from the other activities of the life insurance undertakings, without any possibility of transfer. In the case referred to in the first paragraph of this Article, and only insofar as their occupational retirement provision business is concerned, life insurance undertakings shall not be subject to Articles 76 to 86, Article 132, Article 134(2), Article 173, Article 185(5), Article 185(7) and (8) and Article 209 of Directive 2009/138/EC. The home Member State shall ensure that either the competent authorities, or the authorities responsible for supervision of life insurance undertakings covered by Directive 2009/138/EC, as part of their supervisory work, verify the strict separation of the relevant occupational retirement provision business.
Article 5 Small IORPs and statutory schemes
With the exception of Articles 32 to 35, Member States may choose not to apply this Directive, in whole or in part, to any IORP registered or authorised in their territories which operates pension schemes which together have less than 100 members in total. Subject to Article 2(2), such IORPs shall nevertheless be given the right to apply this Directive on a voluntary basis. Article 11 may be applied only if all the other provisions of this Directive apply. Member States shall apply Article 19(1) and Article 21(1) and (2) to any IORP registered or authorised in their territories which operates pension schemes which together have more than 15 members in total. Member States may choose to apply any of Articles 1 to 8, Article 19 and Articles 32 to 35 to institutions where occupational retirement provision is made under statute, pursuant to national law, and is guaranteed by a public authority.
Article 6 Definitions
For the purposes of this Directive: (1) ‘institution for occupational retirement provision’, or ‘IORP’, means an institution, irrespective of its legal form, operating on a funded basis, established separately from any sponsoring undertaking or trade for the purpose of providing retirement benefits in the context of an occupational activity on the basis of an agreement or a contract agreed: (a) individually or collectively between the employer(s) and the employee(s) or their respective representatives, or (b) with self-employed persons, individually or collectively, in compliance with the law of the home and host Member States, and which carries out activities directly arising therefrom; (2) ‘pension scheme’ means a contract, an agreement, a trust deed or rules stipulating which retirement benefits are granted and under which conditions; (3) ‘sponsoring undertaking’ means any undertaking or other body, regardless of whether it includes or consists of one or more legal or natural persons, which acts as an employer or in a self-employed capacity or any combination thereof and which offers a pension scheme or pays contributions to an IORP; (4) ‘retirement benefits’ means benefits paid by reference to reaching, or the expectation of reaching, retirement or, where they are supplementary to those benefits and provided on an ancillary basis, in the form of payments on death, disability, or cessation of employment or in the form of support payments or services in case of sickness, indigence or death. In order to facilitate financial security in retirement, these benefits may take the form of payments for life, payments made for a temporary period, a lump sum, or any combination thereof; (5) ‘member’ means a person, other than a beneficiary or a prospective member, whose past or current occupational activities entitle or will entitle him/her to retirement benefits in accordance with the provisions of a pension scheme; (6) ‘beneficiary’ means a person receiving retirement benefits; (7) ‘prospective member’ means a person who is eligible to join a pension scheme; (8) ‘competent authority’ means a national authority designated to carry out the duties provided for in this Directive; (9) ‘biometric risks’ mean risks linked to death, disability and longevity; (10) ‘home Member State’ means the Member State in which the IORP has been registered or authorised and in which its main administration is located in accordance with Article 9; (11) ‘host Member State’ means the Member State whose social and labour law relevant to the field of occupational pension schemes is applicable to the relationship between the sponsoring undertaking and members or beneficiaries; (12) ‘transferring IORP’ means an IORP transferring all or a part of a pension scheme's liabilities, technical provisions, and other obligations and rights, as well as corresponding assets or cash equivalent thereof, to an IORP registered or authorised in another Member State; (13) ‘receiving IORP’ means an IORP receiving all or a part of a pension scheme's liabilities, technical provisions, and other obligations and rights, as well as corresponding assets or cash equivalent thereof, from an IORP registered or authorised in another Member State; (14) ‘regulated market’ means a regulated market as defined in point (21) of Article 4(1) of Directive 2014/65/EU; (15) ‘multilateral trading facility’ or ‘MTF’ means a multilateral trading facility or MTF as defined in point (22) of Article 4(1) of Directive 2014/65/EU; (16) ‘organised trading facility’ or ‘OTF’ means an organised trading facility or OTF as defined in point (23) of Article 4(1) of Directive 2014/65/EU; (17) ‘durable medium’ means an instrument which enables a member or a beneficiary to store information addressed personally to that member or beneficiary in a way that is accessible for future reference and for a period of time adequate for the purposes of the information and which allows the unchanged reproduction of the information stored; (18) ‘key function’, within a system of governance, means a capacity to undertake practical tasks comprising the risk management function, the internal audit function, and the actuarial function; (19) ‘cross-border activity’ means operating a pension scheme where the relationship between the sponsoring undertaking, and the members and beneficiaries concerned, is governed by the social and labour law relevant to the field of occupational pension schemes of a Member State other than the home Member State.
Amendment rationale: CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL Reasons for and objectives of the proposal The establishment of a European Single Access Point (ESAP) by 2024 is a flagship action of the Capital Markets Union (CMU) Action Plan adopted by the European Commission in September 2020 1 . ESAP will contribute to the achievement of the CMU’s objectives by providing EU-wide access to information published by entities that is relevant to capital markets, financial services and sustainable finance, i.e. mainly information about their economic activities and products. ESAP will provide access to this information in an efficient and non-discriminatory manner. Information about entities’ activities and products is essential for decision-making by providers of capital. ESAP will contribute to further integrating the financial services and capital markets in the single market, to allocating capital more efficiently across the EU and promoting the development of smaller national capital markets and economies by giving them greater visibility. ESAP will also allow non-listed entities including Small and Medium-Sized enterprises (SMEs) to make available information on a voluntary basis. This will facilitate their access to capital. This proposal is part of a package comprised of: · a proposal for a Regulation establishing a European Single Access Point; · a proposal for a Directive amending certain Directives (this proposal); and · a proposal for a Regulation amending certain Regulations. Amendments to certain Directives are necessary to achieve the above objectives to contribute to the integration of the single market, particularly as regards the collection of information to be made available to ESAP. 
Revised version (Article 6 Definitions):
For the purposes of this Directive: (2) ‘pension scheme’ means a contract, an agreement, a trust deed or rules stipulating which retirement benefits are granted and under which conditions; (3) ‘sponsoring undertaking’ means any undertaking or other body, regardless of whether it includes or consists of one or more legal or natural persons, which acts as an employer or in a self-employed capacity or any combination thereof and which offers a pension scheme or pays contributions to an IORP; (4) ‘retirement benefits’ means benefits paid by reference to reaching, or the expectation of reaching, retirement or, where they are supplementary to those benefits and provided on an ancillary basis, in the form of payments on death, disability, or cessation of employment or in the form of support payments or services in case of sickness, indigence or death. In order to facilitate financial security in retirement, these benefits may take the form of payments for life, payments made for a temporary period, a lump sum, or any combination thereof; (5) ‘member’ means a person, other than a beneficiary or a prospective member, whose past or current occupational activities entitle or will entitle him/her to retirement benefits in accordance with the provisions of a pension scheme; (6) ‘beneficiary’ means a person receiving retirement benefits; (7) ‘prospective member’ means a person who is eligible to join a pension scheme; (8) ‘competent authority’ means a national authority designated to carry out the duties provided for in this Directive; (9) ‘biometric risks’ mean risks linked to death, disability and longevity; (10) ‘home Member State’ means the Member State in which the IORP has been registered or authorised and in which its main administration is located in accordance with Article 9; (11) ‘host Member State’ means the Member State whose social and labour law relevant to the field of occupational pension schemes is applicable to the relationship between the sponsoring undertaking and members or beneficiaries; (12) ‘transferring IORP’ means an IORP transferring all or a part of a pension scheme's liabilities, technical provisions, and other obligations and rights, as well as corresponding assets or cash equivalent thereof, to an IORP registered or authorised in another Member State; (13) ‘receiving IORP’ means an IORP receiving all or a part of a pension scheme's liabilities, technical provisions, and other obligations and rights, as well as corresponding assets or cash equivalent thereof, from an IORP registered or authorised in another Member State; (17) ‘durable medium’ means an instrument which enables a member or a beneficiary to store information addressed personally to that member or beneficiary in a way that is accessible for future reference and for a period of time adequate for the purposes of the information and which allows the unchanged reproduction of the information stored; (18) ‘key function’, within a system of governance, means a capacity to undertake practical tasks comprising the risk management function, the internal audit function, and the actuarial function; (19) ‘cross-border activity’ means operating a pension scheme where the relationship between the sponsoring undertaking, and the members and beneficiaries concerned, is governed by the social and labour law relevant to the field of occupational pension schemes of a Member State other than the home Member State.
Article 7 Activities of an IORP
Member States shall require IORPs registered or authorised within their territories to limit their activities to retirement-benefit related operations and activities arising therefrom. When, in accordance with Article 4, a life insurance undertaking manages its occupational retirement provision business by ring-fencing its assets and liabilities, the ring-fenced assets and liabilities shall be restricted to retirement-benefit related operations and activities directly arising therefrom. As a general principle, IORPs shall, where relevant, have regard to the aim of having an equitable spread of risks and benefits between generations in their activities.
Article 8 Legal separation between sponsoring undertakings and IORPs
Member States shall ensure that there is a legal separation between a sponsoring undertaking and an IORP registered or authorised in their territories in order that the assets of the IORP are safeguarded in the interests of members and beneficiaries in the event of bankruptcy of the sponsoring undertaking.
Article 9 Registration or authorisation
1. Member States shall, in respect of every IORP, the main administration of which is located in their territories, ensure that the IORP is registered in a national register, or authorised, by the competent authority. The location of the main administration refers to the place where the main strategic decisions of an IORP are made. 2. In the case of cross-border activities undertaken in accordance with Article 11, the register shall also indicate the Member States in which the IORP is operating. 3. The information from the register shall be communicated to EIOPA which shall publish it on its website.
Article 10 Operating requirements
1. Member States shall, in respect of every IORP registered or authorised in their territories, ensure that: (a) the IORP has implemented properly constituted rules regarding the operation of any pension scheme; (b) where the sponsoring undertaking guarantees the payment of the retirement benefits, it is committed to regular financing. 2. In accordance with the principle of subsidiarity and taking due account of the scale of pension benefits offered by the social security regimes, Member States may provide that additional benefits such as the option of longevity and disability cover, provision for surviving dependants and a guarantee of repayment of contributions are offered to members with the agreement of the employers and the employees or their respective representatives.
Article 11 Cross-border activities and procedures
1. Without prejudice to national social and labour law on the organisation of pension systems, including compulsory membership and the outcomes of collective bargaining agreements, Member States shall allow an IORP registered or authorised in their territories to carry out cross-border activity. Member States shall also allow undertakings located in their territories to sponsor IORPs which propose to or carry out cross-border activity. 2. An IORP proposing to carry out cross-border activity and to accept sponsorship from a sponsoring undertaking shall be subject to prior authorisation by the relevant competent authority of its home Member State. 3. An IORP shall notify its intention to carry out cross-border activity to the competent authority of the home Member State. Member States shall require IORPs to provide the following information when effecting the notification: (a) the name of the host Member State(s), which shall, where applicable, be identified by the sponsoring undertaking; (b) the name and the location of the main administration of the sponsoring undertaking; (c) the main characteristics of the pension scheme to be operated for the sponsoring undertaking. 4. Where the competent authority of the home Member State is notified under paragraph 3, and unless it has issued a reasoned decision that the administrative structure or the financial situation of the IORP or the good repute or professional qualifications or experience of the persons running the IORP are not compatible with the proposed cross-border activity, that competent authority shall within three months of receiving all the information referred to in paragraph 3 communicate that information to the competent authority of the host Member State and inform the IORP accordingly. The reasoned decision referred to in the first subparagraph shall be issued within three months of receiving all the information referred to in paragraph 3. 5. Where the competent authority of the home Member State does not communicate the information referred to in paragraph 3 to the competent authority of the host Member State, it shall give the reasons for this to the IORP concerned within three months of receiving all that information. That non-communication of information shall be subject to a right of appeal to the courts in the home Member State. 6. IORPs carrying out cross-border activity shall be subject to the information requirements referred to in Title IV imposed by the host Member State in respect of the prospective members, members and beneficiaries which that cross-border activity concerns. 7. Before the IORP starts to carry out a cross-border activity, the competent authority of the host Member State shall, within six weeks of receiving the information referred to in paragraph 3, inform the competent authority of the home Member State, of the requirements of social and labour law relevant to the field of occupational pension schemes under which the pension scheme sponsored by an undertaking in the host Member State must be operated and of the information requirements of the host Member State referred to in Title IV which shall apply to the cross-border activity. The competent authority of the home Member State shall communicate this information to the IORP. 8. On receiving the communication referred to in paragraph 7, or if no communication is received from the competent authority of the home Member State on expiry of the period provided for in paragraph 7, the IORP may start to carry out a cross-border activity in accordance with the host Member State's requirements of social and labour law relevant to the field of occupational pension schemes and with the host Member State's information requirements as referred to in paragraph 7. 9. The competent authority of the host Member State shall inform the competent authority of the home Member State of any significant change in the host Member State's requirements of social and labour law relevant to the field of occupational pension schemes which may affect the characteristics of the pension scheme insofar as it concerns the cross-border activity, and any significant change in the host Member State's information requirements as referred to in paragraph 7. The competent authority of the home Member State shall communicate that information to the IORP. 10. The IORP shall be subject to on-going supervision by the competent authority of the host Member State as to the compliance of its activities with the host Member State's requirements of social and labour law relevant to the field of occupational pension schemes and of the host Member State's information requirements as referred to in paragraph 7. Should this supervision bring irregularities to light, the competent authority of the host Member State shall inform the competent authority of the home Member State immediately. The competent authority of the home Member State shall, in coordination with the competent authority of the host Member State, take the necessary measures to ensure that the IORP puts a stop to the detected breach. 11. If, despite the measures taken by the competent authority of the home Member State or because appropriate measures are lacking in the home Member State, the IORP persists in breaching the applicable provisions of the host Member State's requirements of social and labour law relevant to the field of occupational pension schemes or the host Member State's information requirements as referred to in paragraph 7, the competent authority of the host Member State may, after informing the competent authority of the home Member State, take appropriate measures to prevent or penalise further irregularities, including, insofar as is strictly necessary, preventing the IORP from operating in the host Member State for the sponsoring undertaking.
Amendment rationale: CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL Reasons for and objectives of the proposal The establishment of a European Single Access Point (ESAP) by 2024 is a flagship action of the Capital Markets Union (CMU) Action Plan adopted by the European Commission in September 2020 1 . ESAP will contribute to the achievement of the CMU’s objectives by providing EU-wide access to information published by entities that is relevant to capital markets, financial services and sustainable finance, i.e. mainly information about their economic activities and products. ESAP will provide access to this information in an efficient and non-discriminatory manner. Information about entities’ activities and products is essential for decision-making by providers of capital. ESAP will contribute to further integrating the financial services and capital markets in the single market, to allocating capital more efficiently across the EU and promoting the development of smaller national capital markets and economies by giving them greater visibility. ESAP will also allow non-listed entities including Small and Medium-Sized enterprises (SMEs) to make available information on a voluntary basis. This will facilitate their access to capital. This proposal is part of a package comprised of: · a proposal for a Regulation establishing a European Single Access Point; · a proposal for a Directive amending certain Directives (this proposal); and · a proposal for a Regulation amending certain Regulations. Amendments to certain Directives are necessary to achieve the above objectives to contribute to the integration of the single market, particularly as regards the collection of information to be made available to ESAP. 
Revised version (Article 11 Cross-border activities and procedures):
1. Without prejudice to national social and labour law on the organisation of pension systems, including compulsory membership and the outcomes of collective bargaining agreements, Member States shall allow an IORP registered or authorised in their territories to carry out cross-border activity. Member States shall also allow undertakings located in their territories to sponsor IORPs which propose to or carry out cross-border activity. 2. An IORP proposing to carry out cross-border activity and to accept sponsorship from a sponsoring undertaking shall be subject to prior authorisation by the relevant competent authority of its home Member State. 4. Where the competent authority of the home Member State is notified under paragraph 3, and unless it has issued a reasoned decision that the administrative structure or the financial situation of the IORP or the good repute or professional qualifications or experience of the persons running the IORP are not compatible with the proposed cross-border activity, that competent authority shall within three months of receiving all the information referred to in paragraph 3 communicate that information to the competent authority of the host Member State and inform the IORP accordingly. The reasoned decision referred to in the first subparagraph shall be issued within three months of receiving all the information referred to in paragraph 3. 5. Where the competent authority of the home Member State does not communicate the information referred to in paragraph 3 to the competent authority of the host Member State, it shall give the reasons for this to the IORP concerned within three months of receiving all that information. That non-communication of information shall be subject to a right of appeal to the courts in the home Member State. 6. IORPs carrying out cross-border activity shall be subject to the information requirements referred to in Title IV imposed by the host Member State in respect of the prospective members, members and beneficiaries which that cross-border activity concerns. 7. Before the IORP starts to carry out a cross-border activity, the competent authority of the host Member State shall, within six weeks of receiving the information referred to in paragraph 3, inform the competent authority of the home Member State, of the requirements of social and labour law relevant to the field of occupational pension schemes under which the pension scheme sponsored by an undertaking in the host Member State must be operated and of the information requirements of the host Member State referred to in Title IV which shall apply to the cross-border activity. The competent authority of the home Member State shall communicate this information to the IORP. 8. On receiving the communication referred to in paragraph 7, or if no communication is received from the competent authority of the home Member State on expiry of the period provided for in paragraph 7, the IORP may start to carry out a cross-border activity in accordance with the host Member State's requirements of social and labour law relevant to the field of occupational pension schemes and with the host Member State's information requirements as referred to in paragraph 7. 9. The competent authority of the host Member State shall inform the competent authority of the home Member State of any significant change in the host Member State's requirements of social and labour law relevant to the field of occupational pension schemes which may affect the characteristics of the pension scheme insofar as it concerns the cross-border activity, and any significant change in the host Member State's information requirements as referred to in paragraph 7. The competent authority of the home Member State shall communicate that information to the IORP. 10. The IORP shall be subject to on-going supervision by the competent authority of the host Member State as to the compliance of its activities with the host Member State's requirements of social and labour law relevant to the field of occupational pension schemes and of the host Member State's information requirements as referred to in paragraph 7. Should this supervision bring irregularities to light, the competent authority of the host Member State shall inform the competent authority of the home Member State immediately. The competent authority of the home Member State shall, in coordination with the competent authority of the host Member State, take the necessary measures to ensure that the IORP puts a stop to the detected breach. 11. If, despite the measures taken by the competent authority of the home Member State or because appropriate measures are lacking in the home Member State, the IORP persists in breaching the applicable provisions of the host Member State's requirements of social and labour law relevant to the field of occupational pension schemes or the host Member State's information requirements as referred to in paragraph 7, the competent authority of the host Member State may, after informing the competent authority of the home Member State, take appropriate measures to prevent or penalise further irregularities, including, insofar as is strictly necessary, preventing the IORP from operating in the host Member State for the sponsoring undertaking.
Article 12 Cross-border transfers
1. Member States shall allow IORPs registered or authorised in their territories to transfer all or a part of a pension scheme's liabilities, technical provisions, and other obligations and rights, as well as corresponding assets or cash equivalent thereof, to a receiving IORP. 2. Member States shall ensure that the costs of the transfer are not incurred by the remaining members and beneficiaries of the transferring IORP or by the incumbent members and beneficiaries of the receiving IORP. 3. The transfer shall be subject to prior approval by: (a) a majority of members and a majority of the beneficiaries concerned or, where applicable, by a majority of their representatives. The majority shall be defined in accordance with national law. The information on the conditions of the transfer shall be made available to the members and beneficiaries concerned and, where applicable, to their representatives, in a timely manner by the transferring IORP before the application referred to in paragraph 4 is submitted; and (b) the sponsoring undertaking, where applicable. 4. The transfer of all or a part of a pension scheme's liabilities, technical provisions, and other obligations and rights, as well as corresponding assets or cash equivalent thereof, between transferring and receiving IORPs shall be subject to authorisation by the competent authority of the home Member State of the receiving IORP after obtaining the prior consent of the competent authority of the home Member State of the transferring IORP. The application for authorisation of the transfer shall be submitted by the receiving IORP. The competent authority of the home Member State of the receiving IORP shall grant or refuse the authorisation and communicate its decision to the receiving IORP within three months of receipt of the application. 5. The application for the authorisation of transfer referred to in paragraph 4 shall contain the following information: (a) the written agreement between the transferring and the receiving IORPs setting out the conditions of the transfer; (b) a description of the main characteristics of the pension scheme; (c) a description of the liabilities or technical provisions to be transferred, and other obligations and rights, as well as corresponding assets or cash equivalent thereof; (d) the names and the locations of the main administrations of the transferring and the receiving IORPs and the Member States in which each IORP is registered or authorised; (e) the location of the main administration of the sponsoring undertaking and the name of the sponsoring undertaking; (f) evidence of the prior approval in accordance with paragraph 3; (g) where applicable, the names of the Member States whose social and labour law relevant to the field of occupational pension schemes is applicable to the pension scheme concerned. 6. The competent authority of the home Member State of the receiving IORP shall forward the application referred to in paragraph 4 to the competent authority of the transferring IORP, without delay following its receipt. 7. The competent authority of the home Member State of the receiving IORP shall only assess whether: (a) all the information referred to in paragraph 5 has been provided by the receiving IORP; (b) the administrative structure, the financial situation of the receiving IORP and the good repute or professional qualifications or experience of the persons running the receiving IORP are compatible with the proposed transfer; (c) the long term interests of the members and beneficiaries of the receiving IORP and the transferred part of the scheme are adequately protected during and after the transfer; (d) the technical provisions of the receiving IORP are fully funded at the date of the transfer, where the transfer results in a cross-border activity; and (e) the assets to be transferred are sufficient and appropriate to cover the liabilities, technical provisions and other obligations and rights to be transferred, in accordance with applicable rules in the home Member State of the receiving IORP. 8. The competent authority of the home Member State of the transferring IORP shall only assess whether: (a) in the case of a partial transfer of the pension scheme's liabilities, technical provisions, and other obligations and rights, as well as corresponding assets or cash equivalent thereof, the long term interests of the members and beneficiaries of the remaining part of the scheme are adequately protected; (b) the individual entitlements of the members and beneficiaries are at least the same after the transfer; (c) the assets corresponding to the pension scheme to be transferred are sufficient and appropriate to cover the liabilities, technical provisions and other obligations and rights to be transferred, in accordance with the applicable rules in the home Member State of the transferring IORP. 9. The competent authority of the home Member State of the transferring IORP shall communicate the results of the assessment referred to in paragraph 8 within eight weeks of receipt of the application referred to in paragraph 6 in order to allow the competent authority of the home Member State of the receiving IORP to take a decision in accordance with paragraph 4. 10. Where the authorisation is refused, the competent authority of the home Member State of the receiving IORP shall provide the reasoning for such refusal within the three month period referred to in paragraph 4. That refusal, or a failure to act by the competent authority of the home Member State of the receiving IORP shall be subject to a right of appeal to the courts in the home Member State of the receiving IORP. 11. The competent authority of the home Member State of the receiving IORP shall inform the competent authority of the home Member State of the transferring IORP of the decision referred to in paragraph 4, within two weeks of taking that decision. Where the transfer results in a cross-border activity, the competent authority of the home Member State of the transferring IORP shall also inform the competent authority of the home Member State of the receiving IORP of the requirements of social and labour law relevant to the field of occupational pension schemes under which the pension scheme must be operated and of the information requirements of the host Member State referred to in Title IV which shall apply to the cross-border activity. This shall be communicated within a further four weeks. The competent authority of the home Member State of the receiving IORP shall communicate this information to the receiving IORP within one week of its receipt. 12. Upon receipt of a decision to grant an authorisation as referred to in paragraph 4, or if no information on the decision is received from the competent authority of the home Member State of the receiving IORP on expiry of the period referred to in the third subparagraph of paragraph 11, the receiving IORP may start to operate the pension scheme. 13. In the case of a disagreement about the procedure or content of an action or inaction of the competent authority of the home Member State of the transferring or receiving IORP, including a decision to authorise or refuse a cross-border transfer, EIOPA may carry out non-binding mediation in accordance with point (c) of the second paragraph of Article 31 of Regulation (EU) No 1094/2010 upon request of either of the competent authorities or on its own initiative. 14. Where the receiving IORP carries out a cross-border activity, Article 11(9), (10) and (11) shall apply.
Amendment rationale: CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL Reasons for and objectives of the proposal The establishment of a European Single Access Point (ESAP) by 2024 is a flagship action of the Capital Markets Union (CMU) Action Plan adopted by the European Commission in September 2020 1 . ESAP will contribute to the achievement of the CMU’s objectives by providing EU-wide access to information published by entities that is relevant to capital markets, financial services and sustainable finance, i.e. mainly information about their economic activities and products. ESAP will provide access to this information in an efficient and non-discriminatory manner. Information about entities’ activities and products is essential for decision-making by providers of capital. ESAP will contribute to further integrating the financial services and capital markets in the single market, to allocating capital more efficiently across the EU and promoting the development of smaller national capital markets and economies by giving them greater visibility. ESAP will also allow non-listed entities including Small and Medium-Sized enterprises (SMEs) to make available information on a voluntary basis. This will facilitate their access to capital. This proposal is part of a package comprised of: · a proposal for a Regulation establishing a European Single Access Point; · a proposal for a Directive amending certain Directives (this proposal); and · a proposal for a Regulation amending certain Regulations. Amendments to certain Directives are necessary to achieve the above objectives to contribute to the integration of the single market, particularly as regards the collection of information to be made available to ESAP. 
Revised version (Article 12 Cross-border transfers):
1. Member States shall allow IORPs registered or authorised in their territories to transfer all or a part of a pension scheme's liabilities, technical provisions, and other obligations and rights, as well as corresponding assets or cash equivalent thereof, to a receiving IORP. 2. Member States shall ensure that the costs of the transfer are not incurred by the remaining members and beneficiaries of the transferring IORP or by the incumbent members and beneficiaries of the receiving IORP. 3. The transfer shall be subject to prior approval by: (a) a majority of members and a majority of the beneficiaries concerned or, where applicable, by a majority of their representatives. The majority shall be defined in accordance with national law. The information on the conditions of the transfer shall be made available to the members and beneficiaries concerned and, where applicable, to their representatives, in a timely manner by the transferring IORP before the application referred to in paragraph 4 is submitted; and (b) the sponsoring undertaking, where applicable. 4. The transfer of all or a part of a pension scheme's liabilities, technical provisions, and other obligations and rights, as well as corresponding assets or cash equivalent thereof, between transferring and receiving IORPs shall be subject to authorisation by the competent authority of the home Member State of the receiving IORP after obtaining the prior consent of the competent authority of the home Member State of the transferring IORP. The application for authorisation of the transfer shall be submitted by the receiving IORP. The competent authority of the home Member State of the receiving IORP shall grant or refuse the authorisation and communicate its decision to the receiving IORP within three months of receipt of the application. 6. The competent authority of the home Member State of the receiving IORP shall forward the application referred to in paragraph 4 to the competent authority of the transferring IORP, without delay following its receipt. 9. The competent authority of the home Member State of the transferring IORP shall communicate the results of the assessment referred to in paragraph 8 within eight weeks of receipt of the application referred to in paragraph 6 in order to allow the competent authority of the home Member State of the receiving IORP to take a decision in accordance with paragraph 4. 10. Where the authorisation is refused, the competent authority of the home Member State of the receiving IORP shall provide the reasoning for such refusal within the three month period referred to in paragraph 4. That refusal, or a failure to act by the competent authority of the home Member State of the receiving IORP shall be subject to a right of appeal to the courts in the home Member State of the receiving IORP. 11. The competent authority of the home Member State of the receiving IORP shall inform the competent authority of the home Member State of the transferring IORP of the decision referred to in paragraph 4, within two weeks of taking that decision. Where the transfer results in a cross-border activity, the competent authority of the home Member State of the transferring IORP shall also inform the competent authority of the home Member State of the receiving IORP of the requirements of social and labour law relevant to the field of occupational pension schemes under which the pension scheme must be operated and of the information requirements of the host Member State referred to in Title IV which shall apply to the cross-border activity. This shall be communicated within a further four weeks. The competent authority of the home Member State of the receiving IORP shall communicate this information to the receiving IORP within one week of its receipt. 12. Upon receipt of a decision to grant an authorisation as referred to in paragraph 4, or if no information on the decision is received from the competent authority of the home Member State of the receiving IORP on expiry of the period referred to in the third subparagraph of paragraph 11, the receiving IORP may start to operate the pension scheme. 13. In the case of a disagreement about the procedure or content of an action or inaction of the competent authority of the home Member State of the transferring or receiving IORP, including a decision to authorise or refuse a cross-border transfer, EIOPA may carry out non-binding mediation in accordance with point (c) of the second paragraph of Article 31 of Regulation (EU) No 1094/2010 upon request of either of the competent authorities or on its own initiative. 14. Where the receiving IORP carries out a cross-border activity, Article 11(9), (10) and (11) shall apply.
Article 13 Technical provisions
1. The home Member State shall ensure that IORPs operating occupational pension schemes establish at all times in respect of the total range of their pension schemes an adequate amount of liabilities corresponding to the financial commitments which arise out of their portfolio of existing pension contracts. 2. The home Member State shall ensure that IORPs operating occupational pension schemes, where they provide cover against biometric risks or guarantee either an investment performance or a given level of benefits, establish sufficient technical provisions in respect of the total range of such schemes. 3. The calculation of technical provisions shall take place every year. However, the home Member State may allow a calculation once every three years if the IORP provides members or the competent authorities with a certification or a report of adjustments for the intervening years. The certification or the report shall reflect the adjusted development of the technical provisions and changes in risks covered. 4. The calculation of the technical provisions shall be executed and certified by an actuary or by another specialist in that field, including an auditor, where permitted by national law, on the basis of actuarial methods recognised by the competent authorities of the home Member State, according to the following principles: (a) the minimum amount of the technical provisions shall be calculated by a sufficiently prudent actuarial valuation, taking account of all commitments for benefits and for contributions in accordance with the pension arrangements of the IORP. It must be sufficient both for pensions and benefits already in payment to beneficiaries to continue to be paid, and to reflect the commitments which arise out of members' accrued pension rights. The economic and actuarial assumptions chosen for the valuation of the liabilities shall also be chosen prudently taking account, if applicable, of an appropriate margin for adverse deviation; (b) the maximum rates of interest used shall be chosen prudently and determined in accordance with any relevant rules of the home Member State. Those prudent rates of interest shall be determined by taking into account: (i) the yield on the corresponding assets held by the IORP and the projected future investment returns; (ii) the market yields of high-quality bonds, government bonds, European Stability Mechanism bonds, European Investment Bank (EIB) bonds or European Financial Stability Facility bonds, or; (iii) a combination of points (i) and (ii); (c) the biometric tables used for the calculation of technical provisions shall be based on prudent principles, having regard to the main characteristics of the group of members and the pension schemes, in particular the expected changes in the relevant risks; (d) the method and basis of calculation of technical provisions shall in general remain constant from one financial year to another. However, discontinuities may be justified by a change of legal, demographic or economic circumstances underlying the assumptions. 5. The home Member State may make the calculation of technical provisions subject to additional and more detailed requirements, with a view to ensuring that the interests of members and beneficiaries are adequately protected.
Amendment rationale: CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL Reasons for and objectives of the proposal The establishment of a European Single Access Point (ESAP) by 2024 is a flagship action of the Capital Markets Union (CMU) Action Plan adopted by the European Commission in September 2020 1 . ESAP will contribute to the achievement of the CMU’s objectives by providing EU-wide access to information published by entities that is relevant to capital markets, financial services and sustainable finance, i.e. mainly information about their economic activities and products. ESAP will provide access to this information in an efficient and non-discriminatory manner. Information about entities’ activities and products is essential for decision-making by providers of capital. ESAP will contribute to further integrating the financial services and capital markets in the single market, to allocating capital more efficiently across the EU and promoting the development of smaller national capital markets and economies by giving them greater visibility. ESAP will also allow non-listed entities including Small and Medium-Sized enterprises (SMEs) to make available information on a voluntary basis. This will facilitate their access to capital. This proposal is part of a package comprised of: · a proposal for a Regulation establishing a European Single Access Point; · a proposal for a Directive amending certain Directives (this proposal); and · a proposal for a Regulation amending certain Regulations. Amendments to certain Directives are necessary to achieve the above objectives to contribute to the integration of the single market, particularly as regards the collection of information to be made available to ESAP. 
Revised version (Article 13 Technical provisions):
1. The home Member State shall ensure that IORPs operating occupational pension schemes establish at all times in respect of the total range of their pension schemes an adequate amount of liabilities corresponding to the financial commitments which arise out of their portfolio of existing pension contracts. 2. The home Member State shall ensure that IORPs operating occupational pension schemes, where they provide cover against biometric risks or guarantee either an investment performance or a given level of benefits, establish sufficient technical provisions in respect of the total range of such schemes. 3. The calculation of technical provisions shall take place every year. However, the home Member State may allow a calculation once every three years if the IORP provides members or the competent authorities with a certification or a report of adjustments for the intervening years. The certification or the report shall reflect the adjusted development of the technical provisions and changes in risks covered. 5. The home Member State may make the calculation of technical provisions subject to additional and more detailed requirements, with a view to ensuring that the interests of members and beneficiaries are adequately protected.
Article 14 Funding of technical provisions
1. The home Member State shall require every IORP to have at all times sufficient and appropriate assets to cover the technical provisions in respect of the total range of pension schemes operated. 2. The home Member State may allow an IORP, for a limited period of time, to have insufficient assets to cover the technical provisions. In this case, the competent authorities shall require the IORP to adopt a concrete and realisable recovery plan with a timeline in order to ensure that the requirements of paragraph 1 are met again. The plan shall be subject to the following conditions: (a) the IORP shall set up a concrete and realisable plan to re-establish the required amount of assets to cover fully the technical provisions in due time. The plan shall be made available to members or, where applicable, to their representatives and/or shall be subject to approval by the competent authorities of the home Member State; (b) in drawing up the plan, account shall be taken of the specific situation of the IORP, in particular the asset/liability structure, risk profile, liquidity plan, the age profile of the members entitled to receive retirement benefits, start-up schemes and schemes changing from non-funding or partial funding to full funding; (c) in the event of winding up of a pension scheme during the period referred to in the first sentence of this paragraph, the IORP shall inform the competent authorities of the home Member State. The IORP shall establish a procedure in order to transfer the assets and the corresponding liabilities of that scheme to another IORP, an insurance undertaking or other appropriate body. This procedure shall be disclosed to the competent authorities of the home Member State and a general outline of the procedure shall be made available to members or, where applicable, to their representatives in accordance with the principle of confidentiality. 3. In the event of cross-border activity, the technical provisions shall at all times be fully funded in respect of the total range of pension schemes operated. If this condition is not met, the competent authority of the home Member State shall promptly intervene and require the IORP to immediately draw up appropriate measures and implement them without delay in a way that members and beneficiaries are adequately protected.
Amendment rationale: CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL Reasons for and objectives of the proposal The establishment of a European Single Access Point (ESAP) by 2024 is a flagship action of the Capital Markets Union (CMU) Action Plan adopted by the European Commission in September 2020 1 . ESAP will contribute to the achievement of the CMU’s objectives by providing EU-wide access to information published by entities that is relevant to capital markets, financial services and sustainable finance, i.e. mainly information about their economic activities and products. ESAP will provide access to this information in an efficient and non-discriminatory manner. Information about entities’ activities and products is essential for decision-making by providers of capital. ESAP will contribute to further integrating the financial services and capital markets in the single market, to allocating capital more efficiently across the EU and promoting the development of smaller national capital markets and economies by giving them greater visibility. ESAP will also allow non-listed entities including Small and Medium-Sized enterprises (SMEs) to make available information on a voluntary basis. This will facilitate their access to capital. This proposal is part of a package comprised of: · a proposal for a Regulation establishing a European Single Access Point; · a proposal for a Directive amending certain Directives (this proposal); and · a proposal for a Regulation amending certain Regulations. Amendments to certain Directives are necessary to achieve the above objectives to contribute to the integration of the single market, particularly as regards the collection of information to be made available to ESAP. 
Revised version (Article 14 Funding of technical provisions):
1. The home Member State shall require every IORP to have at all times sufficient and appropriate assets to cover the technical provisions in respect of the total range of pension schemes operated. 3. In the event of cross-border activity, the technical provisions shall at all times be fully funded in respect of the total range of pension schemes operated. If this condition is not met, the competent authority of the home Member State shall promptly intervene and require the IORP to immediately draw up appropriate measures and implement them without delay in a way that members and beneficiaries are adequately protected.
Article 15 Regulatory own funds
1. The home Member State shall ensure that IORPs operating pension schemes, where the IORP itself, and not the sponsoring undertaking, underwrites the liability to cover against biometric risk, or guarantees a given investment performance or a given level of benefits, hold on a permanent basis additional assets above the technical provisions to serve as a buffer. The amount thereof shall reflect the type of risk and the portfolio of assets in respect of the total range of schemes operated. Those assets shall be free of all foreseeable liabilities and serve as a safety capital to absorb discrepancies between the anticipated and the actual expenses and profits. 2. For the purposes of calculating the minimum amount of additional assets, the rules laid down in Articles 16, 17 and 18 shall apply. 3. Paragraph 1 shall, however, not prevent Member States from requiring IORPs located in their territory to hold regulatory own funds or from laying down more detailed rules provided that they are prudentially justified.
Article 16 Available solvency margin
1. Member States shall require of every IORP referred to in Article 15(1) which is registered or authorised in their territories an adequate available solvency margin in respect of its entire business at all times which is at least equal to the requirements in this Directive in order to ensure long-term sustainability of occupational retirement provision. 2. The available solvency margin shall consist of the assets of the IORP free of any foreseeable liabilities, less any intangible items, including: (a) the paid-up share capital or, in the case of an IORP taking the form of a mutual undertaking, the effective initial fund plus any accounts of the members of the mutual undertaking which fulfil the following criteria: (i) the memorandum and articles of association must stipulate that payments may be made from those accounts to members of the mutual undertaking only insofar as this does not cause the available solvency margin to fall below the required level or, after the dissolution of the undertaking, where all the undertaking's other debts have been settled; (ii) the memorandum and articles of association must stipulate, with respect to any payments referred to in point (i) for reasons other than the individual termination of membership in the mutual undertaking, that the competent authorities must be notified at least one month in advance and can prohibit the payment within that period; and (iii) the relevant provisions of the memorandum and articles of association may be amended only after the competent authorities have declared that they have no objection to the amendment, without prejudice to the criteria referred to in points (i) and (ii); (b) reserves (statutory and free) not corresponding to underwriting liabilities; (c) the profit or loss brought forward after deduction of dividends to be paid; and (d) insofar as authorised under national law, profit reserves appearing in the balance sheet where they may be used to cover any losses which may arise and where they have not been made available for distribution to members and beneficiaries. The available solvency margin shall be reduced by the amount of own shares directly held by the IORP. 3. Member States may provide that the available solvency margin may also comprise: (a) cumulative preferential share capital and subordinated loan capital up to 50 % of the lesser of the available solvency margin and the required solvency margin, no more than 25 % of which shall consist of subordinated loans with a fixed maturity, or fixed-term cumulative preferential share capital, provided that binding agreements exist under which, in the event of the bankruptcy or liquidation of the IORP, the subordinated loan capital or preferential share capital ranks after the claims of all other creditors and is not to be repaid until all other debts outstanding at the time have been settled; (b) securities with no specified maturity date and other instruments, including cumulative preferential shares other than those referred to in point (a), to a maximum of 50 % of the available solvency margin, or the required solvency margin, whichever the lesser, for the total of such securities, and the subordinated loan capital referred to in point (a), provided they fulfil the following conditions: (i) they must not be repaid on the initiative of the bearer or without the prior consent of the competent authority; (ii) the contract of issue must enable the IORP to defer the payment of interest on the loan; (iii) the lender's claims on the IORP must rank entirely after those of all non-subordinated creditors; (iv) the documents governing the issue of the securities must provide for the loss-absorption capacity of the debt and unpaid interest, while enabling the IORP to continue its business; and (v) only fully paid-up amounts must be taken into account. For the purposes of point (a), subordinated loan capital shall also fulfil the following conditions: (i) only fully paid-up funds shall be taken into account; (ii) for loans with a fixed maturity, the original maturity shall be at least five years. No later than one year before the repayment date, the IORP shall submit to the competent authorities for their approval a plan showing how the available solvency margin will be kept at or brought to the required level at maturity, unless the extent to which the loan may rank as a component of the available solvency margin is gradually reduced during at least the five years before the repayment date. The competent authorities may authorise the early repayment of such loans provided application is made by the issuing IORP and its available solvency margin will not fall below the required level; (iii) loans the maturity of which is not fixed shall be repayable only subject to five years' notice unless the loans are no longer considered as a component of the available solvency margin or unless the prior consent of the competent authorities is specifically required for early repayment. In the latter event the IORP shall notify the competent authorities at least six months before the date of the proposed repayment, specifying the available solvency margin and the required solvency margin both before and after that repayment. The competent authorities shall authorise repayment only where the IORP's available solvency margin will not fall below the required level; (iv) the loan agreement shall not include any clause providing that in specified circumstances, other than the winding-up of the IORP, the debt will become repayable before the agreed repayment dates; and (v) the loan agreement may be amended only after the competent authorities have declared that they have no objection to the amendment. 4. Upon application, with supporting evidence, by the IORP to the competent authority of the home Member State and with the agreement of that competent authority, the available solvency margin may also comprise: (a) where Zillmerising is not practised or where, if practised, it is less than the loading for acquisition costs included in the premium, the difference between a non-Zillmerised or partially Zillmerised mathematical provision and a mathematical provision Zillmerised at a rate equal to the loading for acquisition costs included in the premium; (b) any hidden net reserves arising out of the valuation of assets, insofar as such hidden net reserves are not of an exceptional nature; (c) one half of the unpaid share capital or initial fund, once the paid-up part amounts to 25 % of that share capital or fund, up to 50 % of the available or required solvency margin, whichever is the lesser. The figure referred to in point (a) shall not exceed 3,5 % of the sum of the differences between the relevant capital sums of life insurance and occupational retirement provision activities and the mathematical provisions for all policies for which Zillmerising is possible. The difference shall be reduced by the amount of any undepreciated acquisition costs entered as an asset.
Amendment rationale: CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL Reasons for and objectives of the proposal The establishment of a European Single Access Point (ESAP) by 2024 is a flagship action of the Capital Markets Union (CMU) Action Plan adopted by the European Commission in September 2020 1 . ESAP will contribute to the achievement of the CMU’s objectives by providing EU-wide access to information published by entities that is relevant to capital markets, financial services and sustainable finance, i.e. mainly information about their economic activities and products. ESAP will provide access to this information in an efficient and non-discriminatory manner. Information about entities’ activities and products is essential for decision-making by providers of capital. ESAP will contribute to further integrating the financial services and capital markets in the single market, to allocating capital more efficiently across the EU and promoting the development of smaller national capital markets and economies by giving them greater visibility. ESAP will also allow non-listed entities including Small and Medium-Sized enterprises (SMEs) to make available information on a voluntary basis. This will facilitate their access to capital. This proposal is part of a package comprised of: · a proposal for a Regulation establishing a European Single Access Point; · a proposal for a Directive amending certain Directives (this proposal); and · a proposal for a Regulation amending certain Regulations. Amendments to certain Directives are necessary to achieve the above objectives to contribute to the integration of the single market, particularly as regards the collection of information to be made available to ESAP. 
Revised version (Article 16 Available solvency margin):
1. Member States shall require of every IORP referred to in Article 15(1) which is registered or authorised in their territories an adequate available solvency margin in respect of its entire business at all times which is at least equal to the requirements in this Directive in order to ensure long-term sustainability of occupational retirement provision. The available solvency margin shall be reduced by the amount of own shares directly held by the IORP. The figure referred to in point (a) shall not exceed 3,5 % of the sum of the differences between the relevant capital sums of life insurance and occupational retirement provision activities and the mathematical provisions for all policies for which Zillmerising is possible. The difference shall be reduced by the amount of any undepreciated acquisition costs entered as an asset.
Article 17 Required solvency margin
1. The required solvency margin shall be determined as laid down in paragraphs 2 to 6 according to the liabilities underwritten. 2. The required solvency margin shall be equal to the sum of the following results: (a) the first result: a 4 % fraction of the mathematical provisions relating to direct business and reinsurance acceptances gross of reinsurance cessions shall be multiplied by the ratio, which shall not be less than 85 %, for the previous financial year, of the mathematical provisions net of reinsurance cessions to the gross total mathematical provisions; (b) the second result: for policies on which the capital at risk is not a negative figure, a 0,3 % fraction of such capital underwritten by the IORP shall be multiplied by the ratio, which shall not be less than 50 %, for the previous financial year, of the total capital at risk retained as the IORP's liability after reinsurance cessions and retrocessions to the total capital at risk gross of reinsurance. For temporary assurances on death of a maximum term of three years, that fraction shall be 0,1 %. For such assurance of a term of more than three years but not more than five years, that fraction shall be 0,15 %. 3. For supplementary insurances referred to in point (a)(iii) of Article 2(3) of Directive 2009/138/EC, the required solvency margin shall be equal to the required solvency margin for IORPs as laid down in Article 18. 4. For capital redemption operations referred to in point (b)(ii) of Article 2(3) of Directive 2009/138/EC, the required solvency margin shall be equal to a 4 % fraction of the mathematical provisions calculated in compliance with paragraph 2(a). 5. For operations referred to in point (b)(i) of Article 2(3) of Directive 2009/138/EC, the required solvency margin shall be equal to 1 % of their assets. 6. For assurances linked to investment funds and covered by points (a)(i) and (ii) of Article 2(3) of Directive 2009/138/EC and for the operations referred to in points (b)(iii) to (v) of Article 2(3) of Directive 2009/138/EC, the required solvency margin shall be equal to the sum of the following: (a) insofar as the IORP bears an investment risk, a 4 % fraction of the technical provisions, calculated in compliance with paragraph 2(a); (b) insofar as the IORP bears no investment risk but the allocation to cover management expenses is fixed for a period exceeding five years, a 1 % fraction of the technical provisions, calculated in compliance with paragraph 2(a); (c) insofar as the IORP bears no investment risk and the allocation to cover management expenses is not fixed for a period exceeding five years, an amount equivalent to 25 % of the net administrative expenses of the previous financial year pertaining to such assurances and operations; (d) insofar as the IORP covers a death risk, a 0,3 % fraction of the capital at risk calculated in compliance with paragraph 2(b).
Amendment rationale: CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL Reasons for and objectives of the proposal The establishment of a European Single Access Point (ESAP) by 2024 is a flagship action of the Capital Markets Union (CMU) Action Plan adopted by the European Commission in September 2020 1 . ESAP will contribute to the achievement of the CMU’s objectives by providing EU-wide access to information published by entities that is relevant to capital markets, financial services and sustainable finance, i.e. mainly information about their economic activities and products. ESAP will provide access to this information in an efficient and non-discriminatory manner. Information about entities’ activities and products is essential for decision-making by providers of capital. ESAP will contribute to further integrating the financial services and capital markets in the single market, to allocating capital more efficiently across the EU and promoting the development of smaller national capital markets and economies by giving them greater visibility. ESAP will also allow non-listed entities including Small and Medium-Sized enterprises (SMEs) to make available information on a voluntary basis. This will facilitate their access to capital. This proposal is part of a package comprised of: · a proposal for a Regulation establishing a European Single Access Point; · a proposal for a Directive amending certain Directives (this proposal); and · a proposal for a Regulation amending certain Regulations. Amendments to certain Directives are necessary to achieve the above objectives to contribute to the integration of the single market, particularly as regards the collection of information to be made available to ESAP. 
Revised version (Article 17 Required solvency margin):
1. The required solvency margin shall be determined as laid down in paragraphs 2 to 6 according to the liabilities underwritten. 2. The required solvency margin shall be equal to the sum of the following results: (a) the first result: a 4 % fraction of the mathematical provisions relating to direct business and reinsurance acceptances gross of reinsurance cessions shall be multiplied by the ratio, which shall not be less than 85 %, for the previous financial year, of the mathematical provisions net of reinsurance cessions to the gross total mathematical provisions; (b) the second result: for policies on which the capital at risk is not a negative figure, a 0,3 % fraction of such capital underwritten by the IORP shall be multiplied by the ratio, which shall not be less than 50 %, for the previous financial year, of the total capital at risk retained as the IORP's liability after reinsurance cessions and retrocessions to the total capital at risk gross of reinsurance. For temporary assurances on death of a maximum term of three years, that fraction shall be 0,1 %. For such assurance of a term of more than three years but not more than five years, that fraction shall be 0,15 %.
Article 18 Required solvency margin for the purpose of Article 17(3)
1. The required solvency margin shall be determined on the basis either of the annual amount of premiums or contributions, or of the average burden of claims for the past three financial years. 2. The amount of the required solvency margin shall be equal to the higher of the two results as set out in paragraphs 3 and 4. 3. The premium basis shall be calculated using the higher of gross written premiums or contributions as calculated below, and gross earned premiums or contributions. The premiums or contributions (inclusive of charges ancillary to premiums or contributions) due in respect of direct business in the previous financial year shall be aggregated. To that sum there shall be added the amount of premiums accepted for all reinsurance in the previous financial year. From that sum there shall then be deducted the total amount of premiums or contributions cancelled in the previous financial year, as well as the total amount of taxes and levies pertaining to the premiums or contributions entering into the aggregate. The amount so obtained shall be divided into two portions, the first extending up to EUR 50 000 000, the second comprising the excess; 18 % of the first portion and 16 % of the second shall be added together. The sum so obtained shall be multiplied by the ratio existing in respect of the sum of the previous three financial years between the amount of claims remaining to be borne by the IORP after deduction of amounts recoverable under reinsurance and the gross amount of claims. That ratio shall be no less than 50 %. 4. The claims basis shall be calculated, as follows: The amounts of claims paid in respect of direct business (without any deduction of claims borne by reinsurers and retrocessionaires) in the periods specified in paragraph 1 shall be aggregated. To that sum there shall be added the amount of claims paid in respect of reinsurances or retrocessions accepted during the same periods and the amount of provisions for claims outstanding established at the end of the previous financial year both for direct business and for reinsurance acceptances. From that sum there shall be deducted the amount of recoveries effected during the periods specified in paragraph 1. From the sum then remaining, there shall be deducted the amount of provisions for claims outstanding established at the commencement of the second financial year preceding the last financial year for which there are accounts, both for direct business and for reinsurance acceptances. One third of the amount so obtained shall be divided into two portions, the first extending up to EUR 35 000 000 and the second comprising the excess; 26 % of the first portion and 23 % of the second, shall be added together. The sum so obtained shall be multiplied by the ratio existing in respect of the sum of the previous three financial years between the amount of claims remaining to be borne by the IORP after deduction of amounts recoverable under reinsurance and the gross amount of claims. That ratio shall be no less than 50 %. 5. Where the required solvency margin as calculated in paragraphs 2 to 4 is lower than the required solvency margin of the preceding year, the required solvency margin shall be at least equal to the required solvency margin of the preceding year, multiplied by the ratio of the amount of the technical provisions for claims outstanding at the end of the previous financial year and the amount of the technical provisions for claims outstanding at the beginning of the previous financial year. In those calculations, technical provisions shall be calculated net of reinsurance but the ratio may be no higher than 1.
Article 19 Investment rules
1. Member States shall require IORPs registered or authorised in their territories to invest in accordance with the ‘prudent person’ rule and in particular in accordance with the following rules: (a) the assets shall be invested in the best long-term interests of members and beneficiaries as a whole. In the case of a potential conflict of interest, an IORP, or the entity which manages its portfolio, shall ensure that the investment is made in the sole interest of members and beneficiaries; (b) within the prudent person rule, Member States shall allow IORPs to take into account the potential long-term impact of investment decisions on environmental, social, and governance factors; (c) the assets shall be invested in such a manner as to ensure the security, quality, liquidity and profitability of the portfolio as a whole; (d) the assets shall be predominantly invested on regulated markets. Investment in assets which are not admitted to trading on a regulated financial market must in any event be kept to prudent levels; (e) investment in derivative instruments shall be possible insofar as such instruments contribute to a reduction in investment risks or facilitate efficient portfolio management. They must be valued on a prudent basis, taking into account the underlying asset, and included in the valuation of an IORP's assets. IORPs shall also avoid excessive risk exposure to a single counterparty and to other derivative operations; (f) the assets shall be properly diversified in such a way as to avoid excessive reliance on any particular asset, issuer or group of undertakings and accumulations of risk in the portfolio as a whole. Investments in assets issued by the same issuer or by issuers belonging to the same group shall not expose an IORP to excessive risk concentration; (g) investment in the sponsoring undertaking shall be no more than 5 % of the portfolio as a whole and, when the sponsoring undertaking belongs to a group, investment in the undertakings belonging to the same group as the sponsoring undertaking shall not be more than 10 % of the portfolio. Where an IORP is sponsored by a number of undertakings, investment in those sponsoring undertakings shall be made prudently, taking into account the need for proper diversification. Member States may decide not to apply the requirements referred to in points (f) and (g) to investment in government bonds. 2. Taking into account the size, nature, scale and complexity of the activities of the IORPs supervised, Member States shall ensure that the competent authorities monitor the adequacy of the IORPs' credit assessment processes, assess the use of references to credit ratings issued by credit rating agencies as defined in point (b) of Article 3(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1060/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council ( 15 ) , in their investment policies and, where appropriate, encourage mitigation of the impact of such references, with a view to reducing sole and mechanistic reliance on such credit ratings. 3. The home Member State shall prohibit IORPs from borrowing or acting as a guarantor on behalf of third parties. However, Member States may authorise IORPs to carry out some borrowing only for liquidity purposes and on a temporary basis. 4. Member States shall not require IORPs registered or authorised in their territory to invest in particular categories of assets. 5. Without prejudice to Article 30, Member States shall not subject the investment decisions of an IORP registered or authorised in their territory or its investment manager to any kind of prior approval or systematic notification requirements. 6. In accordance with the provisions of paragraphs 1 to 5, Member States may, for the IORPs registered or authorised in their territories, lay down more detailed rules, including quantitative rules, provided they are prudentially justified, to reflect the total range of pension schemes operated by those IORPs. However, Member States shall not prevent IORPs from: (a) investing up to 70 % of the assets covering the technical provisions or of the whole portfolio for schemes in which the members bear the investment risks in shares, negotiable securities treated as shares and corporate bonds admitted to trading on regulated markets, or through MTFs or OTFs, and deciding on the relative weight of those securities in their investment portfolio. However, provided that it is prudentially justified, Member States may apply a lower limit of no lower than 35 % to IORPs which operate pension schemes with a long-term interest rate guarantee, bear the investment risk and themselves provide for the guarantee; (b) investing up to 30 % of the assets covering technical provisions in assets denominated in currencies other than those in which the liabilities are expressed; (c) investing in instruments that have a long-term investment horizon and are not traded on regulated markets, MTFs or OTFs; (d) investing in instruments that are issued or guaranteed by the EIB provided in the framework of the European Fund for Strategic Investments, European Long-term Investment Funds, European Social Entrepreneurship Funds and European Venture Capital Funds. 7. Paragraph 6 shall not preclude the right for Member States to require the application to IORPs registered or authorised in their territory of more stringent investment rules also on an individual basis provided they are prudentially justified, in particular in light of the liabilities entered into by the IORP. 8. The competent authority of the host Member State of an IORP carrying out cross-border activity as referred to in Article 11 shall not lay down investment rules in addition to those set out in paragraphs 1 to 6 for the part of the assets which cover technical provisions for cross-border activity.
Amendment rationale: CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL Reasons for and objectives of the proposal The establishment of a European Single Access Point (ESAP) by 2024 is a flagship action of the Capital Markets Union (CMU) Action Plan adopted by the European Commission in September 2020 1 . ESAP will contribute to the achievement of the CMU’s objectives by providing EU-wide access to information published by entities that is relevant to capital markets, financial services and sustainable finance, i.e. mainly information about their economic activities and products. ESAP will provide access to this information in an efficient and non-discriminatory manner. Information about entities’ activities and products is essential for decision-making by providers of capital. ESAP will contribute to further integrating the financial services and capital markets in the single market, to allocating capital more efficiently across the EU and promoting the development of smaller national capital markets and economies by giving them greater visibility. ESAP will also allow non-listed entities including Small and Medium-Sized enterprises (SMEs) to make available information on a voluntary basis. This will facilitate their access to capital. This proposal is part of a package comprised of: · a proposal for a Regulation establishing a European Single Access Point; · a proposal for a Directive amending certain Directives (this proposal); and · a proposal for a Regulation amending certain Regulations. Amendments to certain Directives are necessary to achieve the above objectives to contribute to the integration of the single market, particularly as regards the collection of information to be made available to ESAP. 
Revised version (Article 19 Investment rules):
1. Member States may decide not to apply the requirements referred to in points (f) and (g) to investment in government bonds. 3. The home Member State shall prohibit IORPs from borrowing or acting as a guarantor on behalf of third parties. However, Member States may authorise IORPs to carry out some borrowing only for liquidity purposes and on a temporary basis. 4. Member States shall not require IORPs registered or authorised in their territory to invest in particular categories of assets. 5. Without prejudice to Article 30, Member States shall not subject the investment decisions of an IORP registered or authorised in their territory or its investment manager to any kind of prior approval or systematic notification requirements. 6. In accordance with the provisions of paragraphs 1 to 5, Member States may, for the IORPs registered or authorised in their territories, lay down more detailed rules, including quantitative rules, provided they are prudentially justified, to reflect the total range of pension schemes operated by those IORPs. However, Member States shall not prevent IORPs from: (a) investing up to 70 % of the assets covering the technical provisions or of the whole portfolio for schemes in which the members bear the investment risks in shares, negotiable securities treated as shares and corporate bonds admitted to trading on regulated markets, or through MTFs or OTFs, and deciding on the relative weight of those securities in their investment portfolio. However, provided that it is prudentially justified, Member States may apply a lower limit of no lower than 35 % to IORPs which operate pension schemes with a long-term interest rate guarantee, bear the investment risk and themselves provide for the guarantee; (b) investing up to 30 % of the assets covering technical provisions in assets denominated in currencies other than those in which the liabilities are expressed; (c) investing in instruments that have a long-term investment horizon and are not traded on regulated markets, MTFs or OTFs; (d) investing in instruments that are issued or guaranteed by the EIB provided in the framework of the European Fund for Strategic Investments, European Long-term Investment Funds, European Social Entrepreneurship Funds and European Venture Capital Funds. 7. Paragraph 6 shall not preclude the right for Member States to require the application to IORPs registered or authorised in their territory of more stringent investment rules also on an individual basis provided they are prudentially justified, in particular in light of the liabilities entered into by the IORP. 8. The competent authority of the host Member State of an IORP carrying out cross-border activity as referred to in Article 11 shall not lay down investment rules in addition to those set out in paragraphs 1 to 6 for the part of the assets which cover technical provisions for cross-border activity.
Article 20 Responsibility of the management or supervisory body
1. Member States shall ensure that the management or supervisory body of an IORP has ultimate responsibility under national law for the compliance, by the IORP concerned, with the laws, regulations and administrative provisions adopted pursuant to this Directive. 2. This Directive is without prejudice to the role of social partners in the management of IORPs.
Article 21 General governance requirements
1. Member States shall require all IORPs to have in place an effective system of governance which provides for sound and prudent management of their activities. That system shall include an adequate and transparent organisational structure with a clear allocation and appropriate segregation of responsibilities and an effective system for ensuring the transmission of information. The system of governance shall include consideration of environmental, social and governance factors related to investment assets in investment decisions, and shall be subject to regular internal review. 2. The system of governance referred to in paragraph 1 shall be proportionate to the size, nature, scale and complexity of the activities of the IORP. 3. Member States shall ensure that IORPs establish and apply written policies in relation to risk management, internal audit and, where relevant, actuarial and outsourced activities. Those written policies shall be subject to prior approval by the management or supervisory body of the IORP and shall be reviewed at least every three years and adapted in view of any significant change in the system or area concerned. 4. Member States shall ensure that IORPs have in place an effective internal control system. That system shall include administrative and accounting procedures, an internal control framework, and appropriate reporting arrangements at all levels of the IORP. 5. Member States shall ensure that IORPs take reasonable steps to ensure continuity and regularity in the performance of their activities, including the development of contingency plans. To that end, IORPs shall employ appropriate and proportionate systems, resources and procedures. 6. Member States shall require IORPs to have at least two persons who effectively run the IORP. Member States may allow that only one person effectively runs the IORP, on the basis of a reasoned assessment conducted by the competent authorities. That assessment shall take into account the role of social partners in the overall management of the IORP, as well as the size, nature, scale and complexity of the activities of the IORP.
Article 22 Requirements for fit and proper management
1. Member States shall require IORPs to ensure that persons who effectively run the IORP, persons who carry out key functions and, where applicable, persons or entities to which a key function has been outsourced in accordance with Article 31 fulfil the following requirements when carrying out their tasks: (a) the requirement to be fit: (i) for persons who effectively run the IORP, this means their qualifications, knowledge and experience are collectively adequate to enable them to ensure a sound and prudent management of the IORP; (ii) for persons who carry out the actuarial or internal audit key functions this means their professional qualifications, knowledge and experience are adequate to properly carry out their key functions; (iii) for persons who carry out other key functions this means their qualifications, knowledge and experience are adequate to properly carry out their key functions; and (b) the requirement to be proper: they are of good repute and integrity. 2. Member States shall ensure that the competent authorities are able to assess whether the persons who effectively run the IORP or carry out key functions fulfil the requirements laid down in paragraph 1. 3. Where a home Member State requires proof of good repute, proof of no previous bankruptcy, or both, from the persons referred to in paragraph 1, that Member State shall accept as sufficient evidence in respect of nationals of other Member States the production of an extract from the judicial record of the other Member State or, in the absence of a judicial record in the other Member State, an equivalent document, showing that those requirements have been met, issued by a competent judicial or administrative authority either in the Member State of which the concerned person is a national or in the home Member State. 4. Where no competent judicial or administrative authority in either the Member State of which the concerned person is a national or in the home Member State issues an equivalent document as referred to in paragraph 3, that person shall be allowed to produce in its place a declaration on oath. However, in home Member States where there is no provision for declarations on oath to be made the nationals of other Member States concerned shall be allowed to produce a solemn declaration made by him or her before a competent judicial or administrative authority in the home Member State or the Member State of which they are a national or before a notary in one of those Member States. Such authority or notary shall issue a certificate attesting the authenticity of the declaration on oath or solemn declaration. 5. The proof in respect of no previous bankruptcy referred to in paragraph 3 may also be provided in the form of a declaration made by the national of the other Member State concerned before a competent judicial, professional or trade body in that other Member State. 6. The documents referred to in paragraphs 3, 4 and 5 shall be presented within three months of their date of issue. 7. Member States shall designate the authorities and bodies competent to issue the documents referred to in paragraphs 3, 4 and 5 and shall immediately inform the other Member States and the Commission thereof. Member States shall also inform the other Member States and the Commission of the authorities or bodies to which the documents referred to in paragraphs 3, 4 and 5 are to be submitted in support of an application to pursue the activities referred to in Article 11 in the territory of that Member State.
Amendment rationale: CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL Reasons for and objectives of the proposal The establishment of a European Single Access Point (ESAP) by 2024 is a flagship action of the Capital Markets Union (CMU) Action Plan adopted by the European Commission in September 2020 1 . ESAP will contribute to the achievement of the CMU’s objectives by providing EU-wide access to information published by entities that is relevant to capital markets, financial services and sustainable finance, i.e. mainly information about their economic activities and products. ESAP will provide access to this information in an efficient and non-discriminatory manner. Information about entities’ activities and products is essential for decision-making by providers of capital. ESAP will contribute to further integrating the financial services and capital markets in the single market, to allocating capital more efficiently across the EU and promoting the development of smaller national capital markets and economies by giving them greater visibility. ESAP will also allow non-listed entities including Small and Medium-Sized enterprises (SMEs) to make available information on a voluntary basis. This will facilitate their access to capital. This proposal is part of a package comprised of: · a proposal for a Regulation establishing a European Single Access Point; · a proposal for a Directive amending certain Directives (this proposal); and · a proposal for a Regulation amending certain Regulations. Amendments to certain Directives are necessary to achieve the above objectives to contribute to the integration of the single market, particularly as regards the collection of information to be made available to ESAP. 
Revised version (Article 22 Requirements for fit and proper management):
2. Member States shall ensure that the competent authorities are able to assess whether the persons who effectively run the IORP or carry out key functions fulfil the requirements laid down in paragraph 1. 3. Where a home Member State requires proof of good repute, proof of no previous bankruptcy, or both, from the persons referred to in paragraph 1, that Member State shall accept as sufficient evidence in respect of nationals of other Member States the production of an extract from the judicial record of the other Member State or, in the absence of a judicial record in the other Member State, an equivalent document, showing that those requirements have been met, issued by a competent judicial or administrative authority either in the Member State of which the concerned person is a national or in the home Member State. 4. Where no competent judicial or administrative authority in either the Member State of which the concerned person is a national or in the home Member State issues an equivalent document as referred to in paragraph 3, that person shall be allowed to produce in its place a declaration on oath. However, in home Member States where there is no provision for declarations on oath to be made the nationals of other Member States concerned shall be allowed to produce a solemn declaration made by him or her before a competent judicial or administrative authority in the home Member State or the Member State of which they are a national or before a notary in one of those Member States. Such authority or notary shall issue a certificate attesting the authenticity of the declaration on oath or solemn declaration. 5. The proof in respect of no previous bankruptcy referred to in paragraph 3 may also be provided in the form of a declaration made by the national of the other Member State concerned before a competent judicial, professional or trade body in that other Member State. 6. The documents referred to in paragraphs 3, 4 and 5 shall be presented within three months of their date of issue. 7. Member States shall designate the authorities and bodies competent to issue the documents referred to in paragraphs 3, 4 and 5 and shall immediately inform the other Member States and the Commission thereof. Member States shall also inform the other Member States and the Commission of the authorities or bodies to which the documents referred to in paragraphs 3, 4 and 5 are to be submitted in support of an application to pursue the activities referred to in Article 11 in the territory of that Member State.
Article 23 Remuneration policy
1. Member States shall require IORPs to establish and apply a sound remuneration policy for all those persons who effectively run the IORP, carry out key functions and other categories of staff whose professional activities have a material impact on the risk profile of the IORP in a manner that is proportionate to their size and internal organisation, as well as to the size, nature, scale and complexity of their activities. 2. Unless otherwise provided for in Regulation (EU) 2016/679, IORPs shall regularly disclose publicly relevant information regarding their remuneration policy. 3. When establishing and applying the remuneration policy referred to in paragraph 1, IORPs shall comply with the following principles: (a) the remuneration policy shall be established, implemented and maintained in line with the activities, risk profile, objectives, and the long-term interest, financial stability and performance of the IORP as a whole, and shall support the sound, prudent and effective management of IORPs; (b) the remuneration policy shall be in line with the long-term interests of members and beneficiaries of pension schemes operated by the IORP; (c) the remuneration policy shall include measures aimed at avoiding conflicts of interest; (d) the remuneration policy shall be consistent with sound and effective risk management and shall not encourage risk-taking which is inconsistent with the risk profiles and rules of the IORP; (e) the remuneration policy shall apply to the IORP and to the service providers referred to in Article 31(1), unless those service providers are covered by the Directives referred to in point (b) of Article 2(2); (f) the IORP shall establish the general principles of the remuneration policy, shall review and update it at least every three years, and shall be responsible for its implementation; (g) there shall be clear, transparent and effective governance with regard to remuneration and its oversight.
Amendment rationale: CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL Reasons for and objectives of the proposal The establishment of a European Single Access Point (ESAP) by 2024 is a flagship action of the Capital Markets Union (CMU) Action Plan adopted by the European Commission in September 2020 1 . ESAP will contribute to the achievement of the CMU’s objectives by providing EU-wide access to information published by entities that is relevant to capital markets, financial services and sustainable finance, i.e. mainly information about their economic activities and products. ESAP will provide access to this information in an efficient and non-discriminatory manner. Information about entities’ activities and products is essential for decision-making by providers of capital. ESAP will contribute to further integrating the financial services and capital markets in the single market, to allocating capital more efficiently across the EU and promoting the development of smaller national capital markets and economies by giving them greater visibility. ESAP will also allow non-listed entities including Small and Medium-Sized enterprises (SMEs) to make available information on a voluntary basis. This will facilitate their access to capital. This proposal is part of a package comprised of: · a proposal for a Regulation establishing a European Single Access Point; · a proposal for a Directive amending certain Directives (this proposal); and · a proposal for a Regulation amending certain Regulations. Amendments to certain Directives are necessary to achieve the above objectives to contribute to the integration of the single market, particularly as regards the collection of information to be made available to ESAP. 
Revised version (Article 23 Remuneration policy):
1. Member States shall require IORPs to establish and apply a sound remuneration policy for all those persons who effectively run the IORP, carry out key functions and other categories of staff whose professional activities have a material impact on the risk profile of the IORP in a manner that is proportionate to their size and internal organisation, as well as to the size, nature, scale and complexity of their activities. 2. Unless otherwise provided for in Regulation (EU) 2016/679, IORPs shall regularly disclose publicly relevant information regarding their remuneration policy.
Article 24 General provisions
1. Member States shall require IORPs to have in place the following key functions: a risk-management function, an internal audit function, and, where applicable, an actuarial function. IORPs shall enable the holders of key functions to undertake their duties effectively in an objective, fair and independent manner. 2. IORPs may allow a single person or organisational unit to carry out more than one key function, with the exception of the internal audit function referred to in Article 26, which shall be independent from the other key functions. 3. The single person or organisational unit carrying out the key function shall be different from the one carrying out a similar key function in the sponsoring undertaking. Member States may, taking into account the size, nature, scale and complexity of the activities of the IORP, allow the IORP to carry out key functions through the same single person or organisational unit as in the sponsoring undertaking, provided that the IORP explains how it prevents or manages any conflicts of interest with the sponsoring undertaking. 4. The holders of a key function shall report any material findings and recommendations in the area of their responsibility to the administrative, management or supervisory body of the IORP which shall determine what actions are to be taken. 5. Without prejudice to the privilege against self-incrimination, the holder of a key function shall inform the competent authority of the IORP if the administrative, management or supervisory body of the IORP does not take appropriate and timely remedial action in the following cases: (a) where the person or organisational unit carrying out the key function has detected a substantial risk that the IORP will not comply with a materially significant statutory requirement and reported it to the administrative, management or supervisory body of the IORP and where this could have a significant impact on the interests of members and beneficiaries; or (b) where the person or organisational unit carrying out the key function has observed a significant material breach of the laws, regulations or administrative provisions applicable to the IORP and its activities in the context of the key function of that person or organisational unit and reported it to the administrative, management or supervisory body of the IORP. 6. Member States shall ensure the legal protection of persons informing the competent authority in accordance with paragraph 5.
Article 25 Risk-management
1. Member States shall require IORPs, in a manner that is proportionate to their size and internal organisation, as well as to the size, nature, scale and complexity of their activities, to have in place an effective risk-management function. That function shall be structured in such a way as to facilitate the functioning of a risk-management system for which the IORPs shall adopt strategies, processes and reporting procedures necessary to identify, measure, monitor, manage and report to the administrative, management or supervisory body of the IORP regularly the risks, at an individual and at an aggregated level, to which the IORPs and the pension schemes operated by them are or could be exposed, and their interdependencies. That risk-management system shall be effective and well-integrated into the organisational structure and in the decision-making processes of the IORP. 2. The risk-management system shall cover, in a manner that is proportionate to the size and internal organisation of IORPs, as well as to the size, nature, scale and complexity of their activities, risks which can occur in IORPs or in undertakings to which tasks or activities of an IORP have been outsourced, at least in the following areas, where applicable: (a) underwriting and reserving; (b) asset–liability management; (c) investment, in particular derivatives, securitisations and similar commitments; (d) liquidity and concentration risk management; (e) operational risk management; (f) insurance and other risk-mitigation techniques; (g) environmental, social and governance risks relating to the investment portfolio and the management thereof. 3. Where, in accordance with the conditions of the pension scheme, members and beneficiaries bear risks, the risk management system shall also consider those risks from the perspective of members and beneficiaries.
Amendment rationale: CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL Reasons for and objectives of the proposal The establishment of a European Single Access Point (ESAP) by 2024 is a flagship action of the Capital Markets Union (CMU) Action Plan adopted by the European Commission in September 2020 1 . ESAP will contribute to the achievement of the CMU’s objectives by providing EU-wide access to information published by entities that is relevant to capital markets, financial services and sustainable finance, i.e. mainly information about their economic activities and products. ESAP will provide access to this information in an efficient and non-discriminatory manner. Information about entities’ activities and products is essential for decision-making by providers of capital. ESAP will contribute to further integrating the financial services and capital markets in the single market, to allocating capital more efficiently across the EU and promoting the development of smaller national capital markets and economies by giving them greater visibility. ESAP will also allow non-listed entities including Small and Medium-Sized enterprises (SMEs) to make available information on a voluntary basis. This will facilitate their access to capital. This proposal is part of a package comprised of: · a proposal for a Regulation establishing a European Single Access Point; · a proposal for a Directive amending certain Directives (this proposal); and · a proposal for a Regulation amending certain Regulations. Amendments to certain Directives are necessary to achieve the above objectives to contribute to the integration of the single market, particularly as regards the collection of information to be made available to ESAP. 
Revised version (Article 25 Risk-management):
1. Member States shall require IORPs, in a manner that is proportionate to their size and internal organisation, as well as to the size, nature, scale and complexity of their activities, to have in place an effective risk-management function. That function shall be structured in such a way as to facilitate the functioning of a risk-management system for which the IORPs shall adopt strategies, processes and reporting procedures necessary to identify, measure, monitor, manage and report to the administrative, management or supervisory body of the IORP regularly the risks, at an individual and at an aggregated level, to which the IORPs and the pension schemes operated by them are or could be exposed, and their interdependencies. That risk-management system shall be effective and well-integrated into the organisational structure and in the decision-making processes of the IORP. 3. Where, in accordance with the conditions of the pension scheme, members and beneficiaries bear risks, the risk management system shall also consider those risks from the perspective of members and beneficiaries.
Article 26 Internal audit function
Member States shall require IORPs in a manner that is proportionate to their size and internal organisation, as well as to the size, nature, scale and complexity of their activities, to provide for an effective internal audit function. The internal audit function shall include an evaluation of the adequacy and effectiveness of the internal control system and other elements of the system of governance, including, where applicable, outsourced activities.
Article 27 Actuarial function
1. Where an IORP itself provides cover against biometric risks or guarantees either an investment performance or a given level of benefits, Member States shall require that IORP to provide for an effective actuarial function to: (a) coordinate and oversee the calculation of technical provisions; (b) assess the appropriateness of the methodologies and underlying models used in the calculation of technical provisions and the assumptions made for this purpose; (c) assess the sufficiency and quality of the data used in the calculation of technical provisions; (d) compare the assumptions underlying the calculation of the technical provisions with the experience; (e) inform the administrative, management or supervisory body of the IORP of the reliability and adequacy of the calculation of technical provisions; (f) express an opinion on the overall underwriting policy in the event of the IORP having such a policy; (g) express an opinion on the adequacy of insurance arrangements in the event of the IORP having such arrangements; and (h) contribute to the effective implementation of the risk management system. 2. Member States shall require IORPs to designate at least one independent person, inside or outside the IORP, who is responsible for the actuarial function.
Amendment rationale: CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL Reasons for and objectives of the proposal The establishment of a European Single Access Point (ESAP) by 2024 is a flagship action of the Capital Markets Union (CMU) Action Plan adopted by the European Commission in September 2020 1 . ESAP will contribute to the achievement of the CMU’s objectives by providing EU-wide access to information published by entities that is relevant to capital markets, financial services and sustainable finance, i.e. mainly information about their economic activities and products. ESAP will provide access to this information in an efficient and non-discriminatory manner. Information about entities’ activities and products is essential for decision-making by providers of capital. ESAP will contribute to further integrating the financial services and capital markets in the single market, to allocating capital more efficiently across the EU and promoting the development of smaller national capital markets and economies by giving them greater visibility. ESAP will also allow non-listed entities including Small and Medium-Sized enterprises (SMEs) to make available information on a voluntary basis. This will facilitate their access to capital. This proposal is part of a package comprised of: · a proposal for a Regulation establishing a European Single Access Point; · a proposal for a Directive amending certain Directives (this proposal); and · a proposal for a Regulation amending certain Regulations. Amendments to certain Directives are necessary to achieve the above objectives to contribute to the integration of the single market, particularly as regards the collection of information to be made available to ESAP. 
Revised version (Article 27 Actuarial function):
2. Member States shall require IORPs to designate at least one independent person, inside or outside the IORP, who is responsible for the actuarial function.
Article 28 Own-risk assessment
1. Member States shall require IORPs, in a manner that is proportionate to their size and internal organisation, as well as to the size, nature, scale and complexity of their activities, to carry out and document their own-risk assessment. That risk assessment shall be performed at least every three years or without delay following any significant change in the risk profile of the IORP or of the pension schemes operated by the IORP. Where there is a significant change in the risk profile of a specific pension scheme, the risk assessment may be limited to that pension scheme. 2. Member States shall ensure that the risk assessment referred to in paragraph 1, having regard to the size and internal organisation of the IORP, as well as to the size, nature, scale and complexity of the IORP's activities, includes the following: (a) a description of how own-risk assessment is integrated into the management process and into the decision-making processes of the IORP; (b) an assessment of the effectiveness of the risk-management system; (c) a description of how the IORP prevents conflicts of interest with the sponsoring undertaking, where the IORP outsources key functions to the sponsoring undertaking in accordance with Article 24(3); (d) an assessment of the overall funding needs of the IORP, including a description of the recovery plan where applicable; (e) an assessment of the risks to members and beneficiaries relating to the paying out of their retirement benefits and the effectiveness of any remedial action taking into account, where applicable: (i) indexation mechanisms; (ii) benefit reduction mechanisms, including the extent to which accrued pension benefits can be reduced, under which conditions and by whom; (f) a qualitative assessment of the mechanisms protecting retirement benefits, including, as applicable, guarantees, covenants or any other type of financial support by the sponsoring undertaking, insurance or reinsurance by an undertaking covered by Directive 2009/138/EC or coverage by a pension protection scheme, in favour of the IORP or the members and beneficiaries; (g) a qualitative assessment of the operational risks; (h) where environmental, social and governance factors are considered in investment decisions, an assessment of new or emerging risks, including risks related to climate change, use of resources and the environment, social risks and risks related to the depreciation of assets due to regulatory change. 3. For the purposes of paragraph 2, IORPs shall have in place methods to identify and assess the risks they are or could be exposed to in the short and in the long term and that may have an impact on the IORP's ability to meet its obligations. Those methods shall be proportionate to the size, nature, scale and complexity of the risks inherent in its activities. The methods shall be described in the own-risk assessment. 4. The own-risk assessment shall be taken into account in the strategic decisions of the IORP.
Amendment rationale: CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL Reasons for and objectives of the proposal The establishment of a European Single Access Point (ESAP) by 2024 is a flagship action of the Capital Markets Union (CMU) Action Plan adopted by the European Commission in September 2020 1 . ESAP will contribute to the achievement of the CMU’s objectives by providing EU-wide access to information published by entities that is relevant to capital markets, financial services and sustainable finance, i.e. mainly information about their economic activities and products. ESAP will provide access to this information in an efficient and non-discriminatory manner. Information about entities’ activities and products is essential for decision-making by providers of capital. ESAP will contribute to further integrating the financial services and capital markets in the single market, to allocating capital more efficiently across the EU and promoting the development of smaller national capital markets and economies by giving them greater visibility. ESAP will also allow non-listed entities including Small and Medium-Sized enterprises (SMEs) to make available information on a voluntary basis. This will facilitate their access to capital. This proposal is part of a package comprised of: · a proposal for a Regulation establishing a European Single Access Point; · a proposal for a Directive amending certain Directives (this proposal); and · a proposal for a Regulation amending certain Regulations. Amendments to certain Directives are necessary to achieve the above objectives to contribute to the integration of the single market, particularly as regards the collection of information to be made available to ESAP. 
Revised version (Article 28 Own-risk assessment):
1. Member States shall require IORPs, in a manner that is proportionate to their size and internal organisation, as well as to the size, nature, scale and complexity of their activities, to carry out and document their own-risk assessment. That risk assessment shall be performed at least every three years or without delay following any significant change in the risk profile of the IORP or of the pension schemes operated by the IORP. Where there is a significant change in the risk profile of a specific pension scheme, the risk assessment may be limited to that pension scheme. 3. For the purposes of paragraph 2, IORPs shall have in place methods to identify and assess the risks they are or could be exposed to in the short and in the long term and that may have an impact on the IORP's ability to meet its obligations. Those methods shall be proportionate to the size, nature, scale and complexity of the risks inherent in its activities. The methods shall be described in the own-risk assessment. 4. The own-risk assessment shall be taken into account in the strategic decisions of the IORP.
Article 29 Annual accounts and annual reports
Member States shall require every IORP registered or authorised in their territories to draw up and publicly disclose annual accounts and annual reports taking into account each pension scheme operated by the IORP and, where applicable, annual accounts and annual reports for each pension scheme. The annual accounts and the annual reports shall give a true and fair view of the IORP's assets, liabilities and financial position and include disclosure of significant investment holdings. The annual accounts and information in the reports shall be consistent, comprehensive, fairly presented and duly approved by authorised persons, in accordance with national law.
Article 30 Statement of investment policy principles
Member States shall ensure that every IORP registered or authorised in their territories prepares and, at least every three years, reviews a written statement of investment-policy principles. That statement is to be revised without delay after any significant change in the investment policy. Member States shall provide for this statement to contain, at least, such matters as the investment risk measurement methods, the risk-management processes implemented and the strategic asset allocation with respect to the nature and duration of pension liabilities and how the investment policy takes environmental, social and governance factors into account. The statement shall be made publicly available.
Article 31 Outsourcing
1. Member States may permit or require IORPs registered or authorised in their territories to entrust any activities including key functions and the management of those IORPs, in whole or in part, to service providers operating on behalf of those IORPs. 2. Member States shall ensure that IORPs remain fully responsible for compliance with their obligations under this Directive when they outsource key functions or any other activities. 3. Outsourcing of key functions or any other activities shall not be undertaken in such a way as to lead to any of the following: (a) impairing the quality of the system of governance of the IORP concerned; (b) unduly increasing the operational risk; (c) impairing the ability of the competent authorities to monitor the compliance of the IORP with its obligations; (d) undermining continuous and satisfactory service to members and beneficiaries. 4. IORPs shall ensure the proper functioning of the outsourced activities through the process of selecting a service provider and the ongoing monitoring of the activities of that service provider. 5. Member States shall ensure that IORPs outsourcing key functions, the management of those IORPs, or other activities covered by this Directive enter into a written agreement with the service provider. Such agreement shall be legally enforceable and shall clearly define the rights and obligations of the IORP and the service provider. 6. Member States shall ensure that IORPs notify competent authorities in a timely manner of any outsourcing of the activities covered by this Directive. Where the outsourcing relates to the key functions or management of IORPs, this shall be notified to competent authorities before the agreement in respect of any such outsourcing enters into force. Member States shall also ensure that IORPs notify competent authorities of any subsequent important developments with respect to any outsourced activities. 7. Member States shall ensure that competent authorities have the power to request information from IORPs and from service providers about outsourced key functions or any other activities at any time.
Amendment rationale: CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL Reasons for and objectives of the proposal The establishment of a European Single Access Point (ESAP) by 2024 is a flagship action of the Capital Markets Union (CMU) Action Plan adopted by the European Commission in September 2020 1 . ESAP will contribute to the achievement of the CMU’s objectives by providing EU-wide access to information published by entities that is relevant to capital markets, financial services and sustainable finance, i.e. mainly information about their economic activities and products. ESAP will provide access to this information in an efficient and non-discriminatory manner. Information about entities’ activities and products is essential for decision-making by providers of capital. ESAP will contribute to further integrating the financial services and capital markets in the single market, to allocating capital more efficiently across the EU and promoting the development of smaller national capital markets and economies by giving them greater visibility. ESAP will also allow non-listed entities including Small and Medium-Sized enterprises (SMEs) to make available information on a voluntary basis. This will facilitate their access to capital. This proposal is part of a package comprised of: · a proposal for a Regulation establishing a European Single Access Point; · a proposal for a Directive amending certain Directives (this proposal); and · a proposal for a Regulation amending certain Regulations. Amendments to certain Directives are necessary to achieve the above objectives to contribute to the integration of the single market, particularly as regards the collection of information to be made available to ESAP. 
Revised version (Article 31 Outsourcing):
1. Member States may permit or require IORPs registered or authorised in their territories to entrust any activities including key functions and the management of those IORPs, in whole or in part, to service providers operating on behalf of those IORPs. 2. Member States shall ensure that IORPs remain fully responsible for compliance with their obligations under this Directive when they outsource key functions or any other activities. 4. IORPs shall ensure the proper functioning of the outsourced activities through the process of selecting a service provider and the ongoing monitoring of the activities of that service provider. 5. Member States shall ensure that IORPs outsourcing key functions, the management of those IORPs, or other activities covered by this Directive enter into a written agreement with the service provider. Such agreement shall be legally enforceable and shall clearly define the rights and obligations of the IORP and the service provider. 6. Member States shall ensure that IORPs notify competent authorities in a timely manner of any outsourcing of the activities covered by this Directive. Where the outsourcing relates to the key functions or management of IORPs, this shall be notified to competent authorities before the agreement in respect of any such outsourcing enters into force. Member States shall also ensure that IORPs notify competent authorities of any subsequent important developments with respect to any outsourced activities. 7. Member States shall ensure that competent authorities have the power to request information from IORPs and from service providers about outsourced key functions or any other activities at any time.
Article 32 Investment management
Member States shall not restrict IORPs from appointing, for the management of the investment portfolio, investment managers established in another Member State and duly authorised for this activity, in accordance with Directives 2009/65/EC, 2009/138/EC, 2011/61/EU, 2013/36/EU and 2014/65/EU, as well as the authorised entities referred to in Article 2(1) of this Directive.
Article 33 Appointment of a depositary
1. In the case of an occupational pension scheme where members and beneficiaries fully bear the investment risk, the home Member State may require the IORP to appoint one or more depositaries for the safe-keeping of assets and oversight duties in accordance with Articles 34 and 35. The host Member State may require such IORPs to appoint one or more depositaries for the safe-keeping of assets and oversight duties in accordance with Articles 34 and 35 when carrying out cross-border activity in accordance with Article 11, provided that the appointment of a depositary is required under its national law. 2. For occupational pension schemes in which the members and beneficiaries do not fully bear the investment risk, the home Member State may require the IORP to appoint one or more depositaries for safe-keeping of assets or for safe-keeping of assets and oversight duties in accordance with Articles 34 and 35. 3. Member States shall not restrict IORPs from appointing depositaries established in another Member State and duly authorised in accordance with Directive 2013/36/EU or Directive 2014/65/EU, or accepted as a depositary for the purposes of Directive 2009/65/EC or Directive 2011/61/EU. 4. Member States shall take the necessary steps to enable competent authorities under their national law to prohibit, in accordance with Article 48, the free disposal of assets held by a depositary or custodian located within their territory at the request of the competent authority of the IORP's home Member State. 5. The depositary shall be appointed by means of a written contract. The contract shall stipulate the transmission of the information necessary for the depositary to perform its duties as set out in this Directive and in other relevant laws, regulations or administrative provisions. 6. When carrying out the tasks laid down in Articles 34 and 35, the IORP and the depositary shall act honestly, fairly, professionally, independently and in the interest of the scheme's members and beneficiaries. 7. A depositary shall not carry out activities with regard to the IORP which may create conflicts of interest between the IORP, the scheme's members and beneficiaries and itself, unless the depositary has functionally and hierarchically separated the performance of its depositary tasks from its other potentially conflicting tasks, and the potential conflicts of interest are properly identified, managed, monitored and disclosed to the scheme's members and beneficiaries and to the administrative, management or supervisory body of the IORP. 8. Where no depositary is appointed, IORPs shall make arrangements to prevent and resolve any conflict of interest in the course of tasks otherwise performed by a depositary and an asset manager.
Article 34 Safekeeping of assets and depositary liability
1. Where the assets of an IORP relating to a pension scheme consisting of financial instruments which can be held in custody are entrusted to a depositary for safekeeping, the depositary shall hold in custody all financial instruments which can be registered in a financial instruments account opened in the depositary's books and all financial instruments which can be physically delivered to the depositary. For those purposes, the depositary shall ensure that the financial instruments which can be registered in a financial instruments account opened in the depositary's books are registered in the depositary's books within segregated accounts in accordance with the rules laid down in Directive 2014/65/EU, opened in the name of the IORP, so that they can be clearly identified as belonging to the IORP or the pension scheme's members and beneficiaries at all times. 2. Where the assets of an IORP relating to a pension scheme consist of other assets than those referred to in paragraph 1, the depositary shall verify that the IORP is the owner of the assets and shall maintain a record of those assets. The verification shall be carried out on the basis of information or documents provided by the IORP and, where available, on the basis of external evidence. The depositary shall keep its record up-to-date. 3. Member States shall ensure that a depositary is liable to the IORP and the members and beneficiaries for any loss suffered by them as a result of its unjustifiable failure to perform its obligations or its improper performance of them. 4. Member States shall ensure that a depositary's liability, as referred to in paragraph 3, shall not be affected by the fact that it has entrusted to a third party all or some of the assets in its safe-keeping. 5. Where no depositary is appointed for the safe-keeping of assets, IORPs shall, at least be required to: (a) ensure that financial instruments are subject to due care and protection; (b) keep records that enable the IORP to identify all assets at all times and without delay; (c) take the necessary measures to avoid conflicts of interest in relation to the safe-keeping of assets; (d) inform the competent authorities, upon request, about the manner in which assets are kept.
Amendment rationale: CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL Reasons for and objectives of the proposal The establishment of a European Single Access Point (ESAP) by 2024 is a flagship action of the Capital Markets Union (CMU) Action Plan adopted by the European Commission in September 2020 1 . ESAP will contribute to the achievement of the CMU’s objectives by providing EU-wide access to information published by entities that is relevant to capital markets, financial services and sustainable finance, i.e. mainly information about their economic activities and products. ESAP will provide access to this information in an efficient and non-discriminatory manner. Information about entities’ activities and products is essential for decision-making by providers of capital. ESAP will contribute to further integrating the financial services and capital markets in the single market, to allocating capital more efficiently across the EU and promoting the development of smaller national capital markets and economies by giving them greater visibility. ESAP will also allow non-listed entities including Small and Medium-Sized enterprises (SMEs) to make available information on a voluntary basis. This will facilitate their access to capital. This proposal is part of a package comprised of: · a proposal for a Regulation establishing a European Single Access Point; · a proposal for a Directive amending certain Directives (this proposal); and · a proposal for a Regulation amending certain Regulations. Amendments to certain Directives are necessary to achieve the above objectives to contribute to the integration of the single market, particularly as regards the collection of information to be made available to ESAP. 
Revised version (Article 34 Safekeeping of assets and depositary liability):
1. Where the assets of an IORP relating to a pension scheme consisting of financial instruments which can be held in custody are entrusted to a depositary for safekeeping, the depositary shall hold in custody all financial instruments which can be registered in a financial instruments account opened in the depositary's books and all financial instruments which can be physically delivered to the depositary. For those purposes, the depositary shall ensure that the financial instruments which can be registered in a financial instruments account opened in the depositary's books are registered in the depositary's books within segregated accounts in accordance with the rules laid down in Directive 2014/65/EU, opened in the name of the IORP, so that they can be clearly identified as belonging to the IORP or the pension scheme's members and beneficiaries at all times. 2. Where the assets of an IORP relating to a pension scheme consist of other assets than those referred to in paragraph 1, the depositary shall verify that the IORP is the owner of the assets and shall maintain a record of those assets. The verification shall be carried out on the basis of information or documents provided by the IORP and, where available, on the basis of external evidence. The depositary shall keep its record up-to-date. 3. Member States shall ensure that a depositary is liable to the IORP and the members and beneficiaries for any loss suffered by them as a result of its unjustifiable failure to perform its obligations or its improper performance of them. 4. Member States shall ensure that a depositary's liability, as referred to in paragraph 3, shall not be affected by the fact that it has entrusted to a third party all or some of the assets in its safe-keeping.
Article 35 Oversight duties
1. In addition to the tasks referred to in Article 34(1) and (2), the depositary appointed for oversight duties shall: (a) carry out instructions of the IORP, unless they conflict with national law or the IORP's rules; (b) ensure that in transactions involving the assets of an IORP relating to a pension scheme any consideration is remitted to the IORP within the usual time limits; and (c) ensure that income produced by assets is applied in accordance with the rules of the IORP. 2. Notwithstanding paragraph 1, the home Member State of the IORP may establish other oversight duties to be performed by the depositary. 3. Where no depositary is appointed for oversight duties, the IORP shall implement procedures which ensure that the tasks, otherwise subject to oversight by depositaries, are being duly performed within the IORP.
Amendment rationale: CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL Reasons for and objectives of the proposal The establishment of a European Single Access Point (ESAP) by 2024 is a flagship action of the Capital Markets Union (CMU) Action Plan adopted by the European Commission in September 2020 1 . ESAP will contribute to the achievement of the CMU’s objectives by providing EU-wide access to information published by entities that is relevant to capital markets, financial services and sustainable finance, i.e. mainly information about their economic activities and products. ESAP will provide access to this information in an efficient and non-discriminatory manner. Information about entities’ activities and products is essential for decision-making by providers of capital. ESAP will contribute to further integrating the financial services and capital markets in the single market, to allocating capital more efficiently across the EU and promoting the development of smaller national capital markets and economies by giving them greater visibility. ESAP will also allow non-listed entities including Small and Medium-Sized enterprises (SMEs) to make available information on a voluntary basis. This will facilitate their access to capital. This proposal is part of a package comprised of: · a proposal for a Regulation establishing a European Single Access Point; · a proposal for a Directive amending certain Directives (this proposal); and · a proposal for a Regulation amending certain Regulations. Amendments to certain Directives are necessary to achieve the above objectives to contribute to the integration of the single market, particularly as regards the collection of information to be made available to ESAP. 
Revised version (Article 35 Oversight duties):
2. Notwithstanding paragraph 1, the home Member State of the IORP may establish other oversight duties to be performed by the depositary. 3. Where no depositary is appointed for oversight duties, the IORP shall implement procedures which ensure that the tasks, otherwise subject to oversight by depositaries, are being duly performed within the IORP.
Article 36 Principles
1. Taking into account the nature of the pension scheme established, Member States shall ensure that every IORP registered or authorised in their territories provides to: (a) prospective members: at least the information set out in Article 41; (b) members: at least the information set out in Articles 37 to 40, 42 and 44; and (c) beneficiaries: at least the information set out in Articles 37, 43 and 44. 2. The information referred to in paragraph 1 shall be: (a) regularly updated; (b) written in a clear manner, using clear, succinct and comprehensible language, avoiding the use of jargon and avoiding technical terms where everyday words can be used instead; (c) not misleading, and consistency shall be ensured in the vocabulary and content; (d) presented in a way that is easy to read; (e) available in an official language of the Member State whose social and labour law relevant to the field of occupational pension schemes is applicable to the pension scheme concerned; and (f) made available to prospective members, members and beneficiaries free of charge through electronic means, including on a durable medium or by means of a website, or on paper. 3. Member States may adopt or maintain further provisions on information to be given to prospective members, members and beneficiaries.
Amendment rationale: CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL Reasons for and objectives of the proposal The establishment of a European Single Access Point (ESAP) by 2024 is a flagship action of the Capital Markets Union (CMU) Action Plan adopted by the European Commission in September 2020 1 . ESAP will contribute to the achievement of the CMU’s objectives by providing EU-wide access to information published by entities that is relevant to capital markets, financial services and sustainable finance, i.e. mainly information about their economic activities and products. ESAP will provide access to this information in an efficient and non-discriminatory manner. Information about entities’ activities and products is essential for decision-making by providers of capital. ESAP will contribute to further integrating the financial services and capital markets in the single market, to allocating capital more efficiently across the EU and promoting the development of smaller national capital markets and economies by giving them greater visibility. ESAP will also allow non-listed entities including Small and Medium-Sized enterprises (SMEs) to make available information on a voluntary basis. This will facilitate their access to capital. This proposal is part of a package comprised of: · a proposal for a Regulation establishing a European Single Access Point; · a proposal for a Directive amending certain Directives (this proposal); and · a proposal for a Regulation amending certain Regulations. Amendments to certain Directives are necessary to achieve the above objectives to contribute to the integration of the single market, particularly as regards the collection of information to be made available to ESAP. 
Revised version (Article 36 Principles):
3. Member States may adopt or maintain further provisions on information to be given to prospective members, members and beneficiaries.
Article 37 General information on the pension scheme
1. Member States shall, in respect of every IORP registered or authorised in their territories, ensure that members and beneficiaries are sufficiently informed about the respective pension scheme operated by the IORP, in particular concerning: (a) the name of the IORP, the Member State in which the IORP is registered or authorised and the name of its competent authority; (b) the rights and obligations of the parties involved in the pension scheme; (c) information on the investment profile; (d) the nature of financial risks borne by the members and beneficiaries; (e) the conditions regarding full or partial guarantees under the pension scheme or of a given level of benefits or, where no guarantee is provided under the pension scheme, a statement to that effect; (f) the mechanisms protecting accrued entitlements or the benefit reduction mechanisms, if any; (g) where members bear investment risk or can take investment decisions, information on the past performance of investments related to the pension scheme for a minimum of five years, or for all the years that the scheme has been operating where this is less than five years; (h) the structure of costs borne by members and beneficiaries, for schemes which do not provide for a given level of benefits; (i) the options available to members and beneficiaries in receiving their retirement benefits; (j) in case a member has the right to transfer pension rights, further information about the arrangements relating to such a transfer. 2. For schemes in which members bear an investment risk and which provide for more than one option with different investment profiles, the members shall be informed of the conditions regarding the range of investment options available, and, where applicable, the default investment option and, the pension scheme's rule to allocate a particular member to an investment option. 3. Members and beneficiaries or their representatives shall receive within a reasonable time, any relevant information regarding changes to the pension scheme rules. In addition, IORPs shall make available to them an explanation of the impact on members and beneficiaries of significant changes to technical provisions. 4. IORPs shall make available the general information on the pension scheme set out in this Article.
Amendment rationale: CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL Reasons for and objectives of the proposal The establishment of a European Single Access Point (ESAP) by 2024 is a flagship action of the Capital Markets Union (CMU) Action Plan adopted by the European Commission in September 2020 1 . ESAP will contribute to the achievement of the CMU’s objectives by providing EU-wide access to information published by entities that is relevant to capital markets, financial services and sustainable finance, i.e. mainly information about their economic activities and products. ESAP will provide access to this information in an efficient and non-discriminatory manner. Information about entities’ activities and products is essential for decision-making by providers of capital. ESAP will contribute to further integrating the financial services and capital markets in the single market, to allocating capital more efficiently across the EU and promoting the development of smaller national capital markets and economies by giving them greater visibility. ESAP will also allow non-listed entities including Small and Medium-Sized enterprises (SMEs) to make available information on a voluntary basis. This will facilitate their access to capital. This proposal is part of a package comprised of: · a proposal for a Regulation establishing a European Single Access Point; · a proposal for a Directive amending certain Directives (this proposal); and · a proposal for a Regulation amending certain Regulations. Amendments to certain Directives are necessary to achieve the above objectives to contribute to the integration of the single market, particularly as regards the collection of information to be made available to ESAP. 
Revised version (Article 37 General information on the pension scheme):
2. For schemes in which members bear an investment risk and which provide for more than one option with different investment profiles, the members shall be informed of the conditions regarding the range of investment options available, and, where applicable, the default investment option and, the pension scheme's rule to allocate a particular member to an investment option. 3. Members and beneficiaries or their representatives shall receive within a reasonable time, any relevant information regarding changes to the pension scheme rules. In addition, IORPs shall make available to them an explanation of the impact on members and beneficiaries of significant changes to technical provisions. 4. IORPs shall make available the general information on the pension scheme set out in this Article.
Article 38 General provisions
1. Member States shall require IORPs to draw up a concise document containing key information for each member taking into consideration the specific nature of national pension systems and of relevant national social, labour and tax law (‘Pension Benefit Statement’). The title of the document shall contain the words ‘Pension Benefit Statement’. 2. The exact date to which the information in the Pension Benefit Statement refers to shall be stated prominently. 3. Members States shall require that the information contained in the Pension Benefit Statement is accurate, updated and made available to each member free of charge through electronic means, including on a durable medium or by means of a website, or on paper, at least annually. A paper copy shall be provided to members on request in addition to any information through electronic means. 4. Any material change to the information contained in the Pension Benefit Statement compared to the previous year shall be clearly indicated. 5. Member States shall set out rules to determine the assumptions of the projections referred to in point (d) of Article 39(1). Those rules shall be applied by IORPs to determine, where relevant, the annual rate of nominal investment returns, the annual rate of inflation and the trend of future wages.
Article 39 Pension Benefit Statement
1. The Pension Benefit Statement shall include, at least, the following key information for members: (a) personal details of the member, including a clear indication of the statutory retirement age, the retirement age laid down in the pension scheme or estimated by the IORP, or the retirement age set by the member, as applicable; (b) the name of the IORP and its contact address and identification of the pension scheme of the member; (c) where applicable, information on full or partial guarantees under the pension scheme and if relevant, where further information can be found; (d) information on pension benefit projections based on the retirement age as specified in point (a), and a disclaimer that those projections may differ from the final value of the benefits received. If the pension benefit projections are based on economic scenarios, that information shall also include a best estimate scenario and an unfavourable scenario, taking into consideration the specific nature of the pension scheme; (e) information on the accrued entitlements or accumulated capital taking into consideration the specific nature of the pension scheme; (f) information on the contributions paid by the sponsoring undertaking and the member into the pension scheme, at least over the last 12 months, taking into consideration the specific nature of the pension scheme; (g) a breakdown of the costs deducted by the IORP at least over the last 12 months; (h) information on the funding level of the pension scheme as a whole. 2. In accordance with Article 60, Member States shall exchange best practices with regard to the format and the content of the Pension Benefit Statement.
Amendment rationale: CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL Reasons for and objectives of the proposal The establishment of a European Single Access Point (ESAP) by 2024 is a flagship action of the Capital Markets Union (CMU) Action Plan adopted by the European Commission in September 2020 1 . ESAP will contribute to the achievement of the CMU’s objectives by providing EU-wide access to information published by entities that is relevant to capital markets, financial services and sustainable finance, i.e. mainly information about their economic activities and products. ESAP will provide access to this information in an efficient and non-discriminatory manner. Information about entities’ activities and products is essential for decision-making by providers of capital. ESAP will contribute to further integrating the financial services and capital markets in the single market, to allocating capital more efficiently across the EU and promoting the development of smaller national capital markets and economies by giving them greater visibility. ESAP will also allow non-listed entities including Small and Medium-Sized enterprises (SMEs) to make available information on a voluntary basis. This will facilitate their access to capital. This proposal is part of a package comprised of: · a proposal for a Regulation establishing a European Single Access Point; · a proposal for a Directive amending certain Directives (this proposal); and · a proposal for a Regulation amending certain Regulations. Amendments to certain Directives are necessary to achieve the above objectives to contribute to the integration of the single market, particularly as regards the collection of information to be made available to ESAP. 
Revised version (Article 39 Pension Benefit Statement):
2. In accordance with Article 60, Member States shall exchange best practices with regard to the format and the content of the Pension Benefit Statement.
Article 40 Supplementary information
1. The Pension Benefit Statement shall specify where and how to obtain supplementary information including: (a) further practical information about the member's options provided under the pension scheme; (b) the information specified in Articles 29 and 30; (c) where applicable, information about the assumptions used for amounts expressed in annuities, in particular with respect to the annuity rate, the type of provider and the duration of the annuity; (d) information on the level of benefits, in case of cessation of employment. 2. For pension schemes where members bear investment risk and where an investment option is imposed on the member by a specific rule specified in the pension scheme, the Pension Benefit Statement shall indicate where additional information is available.
Amendment rationale: CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL Reasons for and objectives of the proposal The establishment of a European Single Access Point (ESAP) by 2024 is a flagship action of the Capital Markets Union (CMU) Action Plan adopted by the European Commission in September 2020 1 . ESAP will contribute to the achievement of the CMU’s objectives by providing EU-wide access to information published by entities that is relevant to capital markets, financial services and sustainable finance, i.e. mainly information about their economic activities and products. ESAP will provide access to this information in an efficient and non-discriminatory manner. Information about entities’ activities and products is essential for decision-making by providers of capital. ESAP will contribute to further integrating the financial services and capital markets in the single market, to allocating capital more efficiently across the EU and promoting the development of smaller national capital markets and economies by giving them greater visibility. ESAP will also allow non-listed entities including Small and Medium-Sized enterprises (SMEs) to make available information on a voluntary basis. This will facilitate their access to capital. This proposal is part of a package comprised of: · a proposal for a Regulation establishing a European Single Access Point; · a proposal for a Directive amending certain Directives (this proposal); and · a proposal for a Regulation amending certain Regulations. Amendments to certain Directives are necessary to achieve the above objectives to contribute to the integration of the single market, particularly as regards the collection of information to be made available to ESAP. 
Revised version (Article 40 Supplementary information):
2. For pension schemes where members bear investment risk and where an investment option is imposed on the member by a specific rule specified in the pension scheme, the Pension Benefit Statement shall indicate where additional information is available.
Article 41 Information to be given to prospective members
1. Member States shall require IORPs to ensure that prospective members who are not automatically enrolled in a pension scheme are informed, before they join that pension scheme, about: (a) any relevant options available to them including investment options; (b) the relevant features of the pension scheme including the kind of benefits; (c) information on whether and how environmental, climate, social and corporate governance factors are considered in the investment approach; and (d) where further information is available. 2. Where members bear investment risk or can take investment decisions, prospective members shall be provided with information on the past performance of investments related to the pension scheme for a minimum of five years, or for all the years that the scheme has been operating where this is less than five years and information on the structure of costs borne by members and beneficiaries. 3. Member States shall require IORPs to ensure that prospective members who are automatically enrolled in a pension scheme are promptly after their enrolment, informed about: (a) any relevant options available to them including investment options; (b) the relevant features of the pension scheme including the kind of benefits; (c) information on whether and how environmental, climate, social and corporate governance factors are considered in the investment approach; and (d) where further information is available.
Amendment rationale: CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL Reasons for and objectives of the proposal The establishment of a European Single Access Point (ESAP) by 2024 is a flagship action of the Capital Markets Union (CMU) Action Plan adopted by the European Commission in September 2020 1 . ESAP will contribute to the achievement of the CMU’s objectives by providing EU-wide access to information published by entities that is relevant to capital markets, financial services and sustainable finance, i.e. mainly information about their economic activities and products. ESAP will provide access to this information in an efficient and non-discriminatory manner. Information about entities’ activities and products is essential for decision-making by providers of capital. ESAP will contribute to further integrating the financial services and capital markets in the single market, to allocating capital more efficiently across the EU and promoting the development of smaller national capital markets and economies by giving them greater visibility. ESAP will also allow non-listed entities including Small and Medium-Sized enterprises (SMEs) to make available information on a voluntary basis. This will facilitate their access to capital. This proposal is part of a package comprised of: · a proposal for a Regulation establishing a European Single Access Point; · a proposal for a Directive amending certain Directives (this proposal); and · a proposal for a Regulation amending certain Regulations. Amendments to certain Directives are necessary to achieve the above objectives to contribute to the integration of the single market, particularly as regards the collection of information to be made available to ESAP. 
Revised version (Article 41 Information to be given to prospective members):
2. Where members bear investment risk or can take investment decisions, prospective members shall be provided with information on the past performance of investments related to the pension scheme for a minimum of five years, or for all the years that the scheme has been operating where this is less than five years and information on the structure of costs borne by members and beneficiaries.
Article 42 Information to be given to members during the pre-retirement phase
In addition to the Pension Benefit Statement, IORPs shall provide each member, in due time before the retirement age as specified in point (a) of Article 39(1), or at the request of the member, with information about the benefit pay-out options available in taking their retirement benefits.
Article 43 Information to be given to beneficiaries during the pay-out phase
1. Member States shall require IORPs to periodically provide beneficiaries with information about the benefits due and the corresponding pay-out options. 2. IORPs shall inform beneficiaries without delay after a final decision has been taken resulting in any reduction in the level of benefits due, and three months before that decision is implemented. 3. When a significant level of investment risk is borne by beneficiaries in the pay-out phase, Member States shall ensure that beneficiaries receive appropriate information regularly.
Article 44 Additional information to be given on request to members and beneficiaries
On request of a member, a beneficiary or their representatives, the IORP shall provide the following additional information: (a) the annual accounts and the annual reports referred to in Article 29, or where an IORP is responsible for more than one scheme, those accounts and reports relating to their particular pension scheme; (b) the statement of investment policy principles, referred to in Article 30; (c) any further information about the assumptions used to generate the projections referred to in point (d) of Article 39(1).
Article 45 Main objective of prudential supervision
1. The main objective of prudential supervision is to protect the rights of members and beneficiaries and to ensure the stability and soundness of the IORPs. 2. Member States shall ensure that the competent authorities are provided with the necessary means, and have the relevant expertise, capacity, and mandate to achieve the main objective of supervision referred to in paragraph 1.
Article 46 Scope of prudential supervision
Member States shall ensure that IORPs are subject to prudential supervision including the supervision of the following where applicable: (a) conditions of operation; (b) technical provisions; (c) funding of technical provisions; (d) regulatory own funds; (e) available solvency margin; (f) required solvency margin; (g) investment rules; (h) investment management; (i) system of governance; and (j) information to be provided to members and beneficiaries.
Article 47 General principles of prudential supervision
1. The competent authorities of the home Member State shall be responsible for the prudential supervision of IORPs. 2. Member States shall ensure that supervision is based on a forward-looking and risk-based approach. 3. Supervision of IORPs shall comprise an appropriate combination of off-site activities and on-site inspections. 4. Supervisory powers shall be applied in a manner which is timely and proportionate to the size, nature, scale and complexity of the activities of the IORP. 5. Member States shall ensure that the competent authorities duly consider the potential impact of their actions on the stability of the financial systems in the Union, in particular in emergency situations.
Article 48 Powers of intervention and duties of the competent authorities
1. The competent authorities shall require every IORP registered or authorised in their territories to have sound administrative and accounting procedures and adequate internal control mechanisms. 2. Without prejudice to the supervisory powers of competent authorities and the right of Member States to provide for and impose criminal sanctions, Member States shall ensure that their competent authorities may impose administrative sanctions and other measures applicable to all infringements of the national provisions implementing this Directive, and shall take all measures necessary to ensure that they are implemented. Member States shall ensure that their administrative sanctions and other measures are effective, proportionate and dissuasive. 3. Member States may decide not to lay down rules on administrative sanctions under this Directive for infringements which are subject to criminal sanctions under their national law. In that case, Member States shall communicate to the Commission the relevant criminal law provisions. 4. Member States shall ensure that the competent authorities publish any administrative sanction or other measure that has been imposed for breaches of the national provisions implementing this Directive and against which no appeal was lodged in time, without undue delay, including information on the type and nature of the breach and the identity of persons responsible for it. However, where the publication of the identity of the legal persons, or identity or personal data of natural persons, is considered by the competent authority to be disproportionate following a case-by-case assessment conducted on the proportionality of the publication of such data or where publication jeopardises the stability of financial markets or an ongoing investigation, the competent authority may decide to defer publication, not to publish, or to publish the sanctions on an anonymous basis. 5. Any decision to prohibit or restrict the activities of an IORP shall contain detailed reasons and be notified to the IORP in question. That decision shall also be notified to EIOPA which shall communicate it to all competent authorities in the case of cross-border activity as referred to in Article 11. 6. Competent authorities may also restrict or prohibit the free disposal of the IORP's assets when, in particular: (a) the IORP has failed to establish sufficient technical provisions in respect of the entire business or has insufficient assets to cover the technical provisions; (b) the IORP has failed to hold the regulatory own funds. 7. In order to safeguard the interests of members and beneficiaries, the competent authorities may transfer the powers which the persons running an IORP registered or authorised in their territories hold in accordance with the law of the home Member State wholly or partly to a special representative who is fit to exercise those powers. 8. The competent authorities may prohibit or restrict the activities of an IORP registered or authorised in their territories in particular if: (a) the IORP fails to protect adequately the interests of scheme members and beneficiaries; (b) the IORP no longer fulfils the conditions of operation; (c) the IORP fails seriously in its obligations under the rules to which it is subject; (d) in the case of cross-border activity, the IORP does not respect the requirements of social and labour law of the host Member State relevant to the field of occupational pension schemes. 9. Member States shall ensure that decisions taken in respect of an IORP under laws, regulations and administrative provisions adopted in accordance with this Directive are subject to a right of appeal to the courts.
Amendment rationale: CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL Reasons for and objectives of the proposal The establishment of a European Single Access Point (ESAP) by 2024 is a flagship action of the Capital Markets Union (CMU) Action Plan adopted by the European Commission in September 2020 1 . ESAP will contribute to the achievement of the CMU’s objectives by providing EU-wide access to information published by entities that is relevant to capital markets, financial services and sustainable finance, i.e. mainly information about their economic activities and products. ESAP will provide access to this information in an efficient and non-discriminatory manner. Information about entities’ activities and products is essential for decision-making by providers of capital. ESAP will contribute to further integrating the financial services and capital markets in the single market, to allocating capital more efficiently across the EU and promoting the development of smaller national capital markets and economies by giving them greater visibility. ESAP will also allow non-listed entities including Small and Medium-Sized enterprises (SMEs) to make available information on a voluntary basis. This will facilitate their access to capital. This proposal is part of a package comprised of: · a proposal for a Regulation establishing a European Single Access Point; · a proposal for a Directive amending certain Directives (this proposal); and · a proposal for a Regulation amending certain Regulations. Amendments to certain Directives are necessary to achieve the above objectives to contribute to the integration of the single market, particularly as regards the collection of information to be made available to ESAP. 
Revised version (Article 48 Powers of intervention and duties of the competent authorities):
1. The competent authorities shall require every IORP registered or authorised in their territories to have sound administrative and accounting procedures and adequate internal control mechanisms. 2. Without prejudice to the supervisory powers of competent authorities and the right of Member States to provide for and impose criminal sanctions, Member States shall ensure that their competent authorities may impose administrative sanctions and other measures applicable to all infringements of the national provisions implementing this Directive, and shall take all measures necessary to ensure that they are implemented. Member States shall ensure that their administrative sanctions and other measures are effective, proportionate and dissuasive. 3. Member States may decide not to lay down rules on administrative sanctions under this Directive for infringements which are subject to criminal sanctions under their national law. In that case, Member States shall communicate to the Commission the relevant criminal law provisions. 4. Member States shall ensure that the competent authorities publish any administrative sanction or other measure that has been imposed for breaches of the national provisions implementing this Directive and against which no appeal was lodged in time, without undue delay, including information on the type and nature of the breach and the identity of persons responsible for it. However, where the publication of the identity of the legal persons, or identity or personal data of natural persons, is considered by the competent authority to be disproportionate following a case-by-case assessment conducted on the proportionality of the publication of such data or where publication jeopardises the stability of financial markets or an ongoing investigation, the competent authority may decide to defer publication, not to publish, or to publish the sanctions on an anonymous basis. 5. Any decision to prohibit or restrict the activities of an IORP shall contain detailed reasons and be notified to the IORP in question. That decision shall also be notified to EIOPA which shall communicate it to all competent authorities in the case of cross-border activity as referred to in Article 11. 6. Competent authorities may also restrict or prohibit the free disposal of the IORP's assets when, in particular: (a) the IORP has failed to establish sufficient technical provisions in respect of the entire business or has insufficient assets to cover the technical provisions; (b) the IORP has failed to hold the regulatory own funds. 7. In order to safeguard the interests of members and beneficiaries, the competent authorities may transfer the powers which the persons running an IORP registered or authorised in their territories hold in accordance with the law of the home Member State wholly or partly to a special representative who is fit to exercise those powers. 9. Member States shall ensure that decisions taken in respect of an IORP under laws, regulations and administrative provisions adopted in accordance with this Directive are subject to a right of appeal to the courts.
Article 49 Supervisory review process
1. Member States shall ensure that competent authorities have the necessary powers to review the strategies, processes and reporting procedures which are established by IORPs to comply with the laws, regulations and administrative provisions adopted pursuant to this Directive, taking into account the size, nature, scale and complexity of the activities of the IORP. That review shall take into account the circumstances in which the IORPs are operating, and, where relevant, the parties carrying out outsourced key functions or any other activities for them. The review shall comprise the following elements: (a) an assessment of the qualitative requirements relating to the system of governance; (b) an assessment of the risks the IORP faces; (c) an assessment of the ability of the IORP to assess and manage those risks. 2. Member States shall ensure that competent authorities have monitoring tools, including stress-tests, that enable them to identify deteriorating financial conditions in an IORP and to monitor how a deterioration is remedied. 3. The competent authorities shall have the necessary powers to require IORPs to remedy weaknesses or deficiencies identified in the supervisory review process. 4. The competent authorities shall establish the minimum frequency and the scope of the review laid down in paragraph 1 having regard to the size, nature, scale and complexity of the activities of the IORP concerned.
Article 50 Information to be provided to the competent authorities
Member States shall ensure that the competent authorities, in respect of any IORP registered or authorised in their territories, have the necessary powers and means to: (a) require the IORP, the administrative, management or supervisory body of the IORP or the persons who effectively run the IORP or carry out key functions to supply at any time information about all business matters or forward all business documents; (b) supervise relationships between the IORP and other companies or between IORPs, when IORPs outsource key functions or any other activities to those other companies or IORPs and all subsequent re-outsourcing, influencing the financial situation of the IORP or being in a material way relevant for effective supervision; (c) obtain the following documents: the own-risk assessment, the statement of investment-policy principles, the annual accounts and the annual reports, and all other documents necessary for the purposes of supervision; (d) lay down which documents are necessary for the purposes of supervision, including: (i) internal interim reports; (ii) actuarial valuations and detailed assumptions; (iii) asset-liability studies; (iv) evidence of consistency with the investment-policy principles; (v) evidence that contributions have been paid in as planned; (vi) reports by the persons responsible for auditing the annual accounts referred to in Article 29; (e) carry out on-site inspections at the IORP's premises and, where appropriate, on outsourced and all subsequent re-outsourced activities to check if activities are carried out in accordance with the supervisory rules; (f) request information from IORPs about outsourced and all subsequent re-outsourced activities at any time.
Amendment rationale: CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL Reasons for and objectives of the proposal The establishment of a European Single Access Point (ESAP) by 2024 is a flagship action of the Capital Markets Union (CMU) Action Plan adopted by the European Commission in September 2020 1 . ESAP will contribute to the achievement of the CMU’s objectives by providing EU-wide access to information published by entities that is relevant to capital markets, financial services and sustainable finance, i.e. mainly information about their economic activities and products. ESAP will provide access to this information in an efficient and non-discriminatory manner. Information about entities’ activities and products is essential for decision-making by providers of capital. ESAP will contribute to further integrating the financial services and capital markets in the single market, to allocating capital more efficiently across the EU and promoting the development of smaller national capital markets and economies by giving them greater visibility. ESAP will also allow non-listed entities including Small and Medium-Sized enterprises (SMEs) to make available information on a voluntary basis. This will facilitate their access to capital. This proposal is part of a package comprised of: · a proposal for a Regulation establishing a European Single Access Point; · a proposal for a Directive amending certain Directives (this proposal); and · a proposal for a Regulation amending certain Regulations. Amendments to certain Directives are necessary to achieve the above objectives to contribute to the integration of the single market, particularly as regards the collection of information to be made available to ESAP. 
Revised version (Article 50 Information to be provided to the competent authorities):
Member States shall ensure that the competent authorities, in respect of any IORP registered or authorised in their territories, have the necessary powers and means to: (a) require the IORP, the administrative, management or supervisory body of the IORP or the persons who effectively run the IORP or carry out key functions to supply at any time information about all business matters or forward all business documents; (b) supervise relationships between the IORP and other companies or between IORPs, when IORPs outsource key functions or any other activities to those other companies or IORPs and all subsequent re-outsourcing, influencing the financial situation of the IORP or being in a material way relevant for effective supervision; (c) obtain the following documents: the own-risk assessment, the statement of investment-policy principles, the annual accounts and the annual reports, and all other documents necessary for the purposes of supervision; (e) carry out on-site inspections at the IORP's premises and, where appropriate, on outsourced and all subsequent re-outsourced activities to check if activities are carried out in accordance with the supervisory rules; (f) request information from IORPs about outsourced and all subsequent re-outsourced activities at any time.
Article 51 Transparency and accountability
1. Member States shall ensure that the competent authorities conduct the tasks laid down in this Directive in a transparent, independent and accountable manner with due respect for the protection of confidential information. 2. Member States shall ensure that the following information is publicly disclosed: (a) the texts of laws, regulations, administrative rules and general guidance in the field of occupational pension schemes, and information about whether the Member State chooses to apply this Directive in accordance with Articles 4 and 5; (b) information regarding the supervisory review process as set out in Article 49; (c) aggregate statistical data on key aspects of the application of the prudential framework; (d) the main objective of prudential supervision and information on the main functions and activities of the competent authorities; (e) the rules on administrative sanctions and other measures applicable to breaches of national provisions adopted pursuant to this Directive. 3. Member States shall ensure that they have in place and apply transparent procedures regarding the appointment and dismissal of the members of the governing and managing bodies of their competent authorities.
Amendment rationale: CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL Reasons for and objectives of the proposal The establishment of a European Single Access Point (ESAP) by 2024 is a flagship action of the Capital Markets Union (CMU) Action Plan adopted by the European Commission in September 2020 1 . ESAP will contribute to the achievement of the CMU’s objectives by providing EU-wide access to information published by entities that is relevant to capital markets, financial services and sustainable finance, i.e. mainly information about their economic activities and products. ESAP will provide access to this information in an efficient and non-discriminatory manner. Information about entities’ activities and products is essential for decision-making by providers of capital. ESAP will contribute to further integrating the financial services and capital markets in the single market, to allocating capital more efficiently across the EU and promoting the development of smaller national capital markets and economies by giving them greater visibility. ESAP will also allow non-listed entities including Small and Medium-Sized enterprises (SMEs) to make available information on a voluntary basis. This will facilitate their access to capital. This proposal is part of a package comprised of: · a proposal for a Regulation establishing a European Single Access Point; · a proposal for a Directive amending certain Directives (this proposal); and · a proposal for a Regulation amending certain Regulations. Amendments to certain Directives are necessary to achieve the above objectives to contribute to the integration of the single market, particularly as regards the collection of information to be made available to ESAP. 
Revised version (Article 51 Transparency and accountability):
1. Member States shall ensure that the competent authorities conduct the tasks laid down in this Directive in a transparent, independent and accountable manner with due respect for the protection of confidential information. 3. Member States shall ensure that they have in place and apply transparent procedures regarding the appointment and dismissal of the members of the governing and managing bodies of their competent authorities.
Article 52 Professional secrecy
1. Member States shall lay down rules to ensure that all persons who are working or who have worked for the competent authorities, as well as auditors and experts acting on behalf of those authorities, are bound by the obligation of professional secrecy. Without prejudice to cases covered by criminal law, those persons shall not divulge confidential information received by them in the course of their duties to any person or authority, except in summary or aggregate form ensuring that individual IORPs cannot be identified. 2. By derogation from paragraph 1, where a pension scheme is being wound up, Member States may allow confidential information to be divulged in civil or commercial proceedings.
Article 53 Use of confidential information
Member States shall ensure that competent authorities which receive confidential information under this Directive use it only in the course of their duties and for the following purposes: (a) to check that the conditions for taking up occupational retirement provision business are met by IORPs before commencing their activities; (b) to facilitate the monitoring of the activities of IORPs, including the monitoring of the technical provisions, the solvency, the system of governance, and the information provided to members and beneficiaries; (c) to impose corrective measures, including administrative sanctions; (d) where permitted by national law, to publish key performance indicators for all individual IORPs, which may assist members and beneficiaries in taking financial decisions regarding their pension; (e) in appeals against decisions of the competent authorities taken in accordance with the provisions transposing this Directive; (f) in court proceedings regarding the provisions transposing this Directive.
Article 54 European Parliament right of inquiry
Articles 52 and 53 shall be without prejudice to the right of inquiry conferred on the European Parliament by Article 226 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.
Article 55 Exchange of information between authorities
1. Articles 52 and 53 shall not preclude any of the following: (a) the exchange of information between competent authorities in the same Member State in the discharge of their supervisory functions; (b) the exchange of information between competent authorities in different Member States in the discharge of their supervisory functions; (c) the exchange of information, in the discharge of their supervisory functions, between competent authorities and any of the following which are situated in the same Member State: (i) authorities responsible for the supervision of financial sector entities and other financial organisations and the authorities responsible for the supervision of financial markets; (ii) authorities or bodies charged with responsibility for maintaining the stability of the financial system in Member States through the use of macro-prudential rules; (iii) bodies involved in the winding up of a pension scheme and in other similar procedures; (iv) reorganisation bodies or authorities aiming at protecting the stability of the financial system; (v) persons responsible for carrying out statutory audits of the accounts of IORPs, insurance undertakings and other financial institutions; (d) the disclosure, to bodies which administer the winding up of a pension scheme, of information necessary for the performance of their duties. 2. The information received by the authorities, bodies and persons referred to in paragraph 1 shall be subject to the rules on professional secrecy laid down in Article 52. 3. Articles 52 and 53 shall not preclude Member States from authorising exchanges of information between the competent authorities and any of the following: (a) the authorities responsible for overseeing the bodies involved in the winding up of pension schemes and other similar procedures; (b) the authorities responsible for overseeing the persons charged with carrying out statutory audits of the accounts of IORPs, insurance undertakings and other financial institutions; (c) independent actuaries of IORPs carrying out supervision of those IORPs and the bodies responsible for overseeing such actuaries.
Amendment rationale: CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL Reasons for and objectives of the proposal The establishment of a European Single Access Point (ESAP) by 2024 is a flagship action of the Capital Markets Union (CMU) Action Plan adopted by the European Commission in September 2020 1 . ESAP will contribute to the achievement of the CMU’s objectives by providing EU-wide access to information published by entities that is relevant to capital markets, financial services and sustainable finance, i.e. mainly information about their economic activities and products. ESAP will provide access to this information in an efficient and non-discriminatory manner. Information about entities’ activities and products is essential for decision-making by providers of capital. ESAP will contribute to further integrating the financial services and capital markets in the single market, to allocating capital more efficiently across the EU and promoting the development of smaller national capital markets and economies by giving them greater visibility. ESAP will also allow non-listed entities including Small and Medium-Sized enterprises (SMEs) to make available information on a voluntary basis. This will facilitate their access to capital. This proposal is part of a package comprised of: · a proposal for a Regulation establishing a European Single Access Point; · a proposal for a Directive amending certain Directives (this proposal); and · a proposal for a Regulation amending certain Regulations. Amendments to certain Directives are necessary to achieve the above objectives to contribute to the integration of the single market, particularly as regards the collection of information to be made available to ESAP. 
Revised version (Article 55 Exchange of information between authorities):
2. The information received by the authorities, bodies and persons referred to in paragraph 1 shall be subject to the rules on professional secrecy laid down in Article 52.
Article 56 Transmission of information to central banks, monetary authorities, European Supervisory Authorities and the European Systemic Risk Board
1. Articles 52 and 53 shall not prevent a competent authority from transmitting information to the following entities for the purposes of the exercise of their respective tasks: (a) central banks and other bodies with a similar function in their capacity as monetary authorities; (b) other public authorities responsible for overseeing payment systems, where appropriate; (c) the European Systemic Risk Board, EIOPA, the European Supervisory Authority (European Banking Authority) established by Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council ( 16 ) and the European Supervisory Authority (European Securities and Markets Authority) established by Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council ( 17 ) . 2. Articles 55 to 58 shall not prevent the authorities or bodies referred to in points (a), (b) and (c) of paragraph 1 of this Article from communicating to the competent authorities such information as the competent authorities may need for the purposes of Article 53. 3. Information received in accordance with paragraphs 1 and 2 shall be subject to professional secrecy requirements at least equivalent to those as set out in this Directive.
Amendment rationale: CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL Reasons for and objectives of the proposal The establishment of a European Single Access Point (ESAP) by 2024 is a flagship action of the Capital Markets Union (CMU) Action Plan adopted by the European Commission in September 2020 1 . ESAP will contribute to the achievement of the CMU’s objectives by providing EU-wide access to information published by entities that is relevant to capital markets, financial services and sustainable finance, i.e. mainly information about their economic activities and products. ESAP will provide access to this information in an efficient and non-discriminatory manner. Information about entities’ activities and products is essential for decision-making by providers of capital. ESAP will contribute to further integrating the financial services and capital markets in the single market, to allocating capital more efficiently across the EU and promoting the development of smaller national capital markets and economies by giving them greater visibility. ESAP will also allow non-listed entities including Small and Medium-Sized enterprises (SMEs) to make available information on a voluntary basis. This will facilitate their access to capital. This proposal is part of a package comprised of: · a proposal for a Regulation establishing a European Single Access Point; · a proposal for a Directive amending certain Directives (this proposal); and · a proposal for a Regulation amending certain Regulations. Amendments to certain Directives are necessary to achieve the above objectives to contribute to the integration of the single market, particularly as regards the collection of information to be made available to ESAP. 
Revised version (Article 56 Transmission of information to central banks, monetary authorities, European Supervisory Authorities and the European Systemic Risk Board):
2. Articles 55 to 58 shall not prevent the authorities or bodies referred to in points (a), (b) and (c) of paragraph 1 of this Article from communicating to the competent authorities such information as the competent authorities may need for the purposes of Article 53. 3. Information received in accordance with paragraphs 1 and 2 shall be subject to professional secrecy requirements at least equivalent to those as set out in this Directive.
Article 57 Disclosure of information to government administrations responsible for financial legislation
1. Articles 52(1), 53 and 58(1) shall not preclude Member States from authorising the disclosure of confidential information between competent authorities and other departments of their central government administrations responsible for the enforcement of legislation on the supervision of IORPs, credit institutions, financial institutions, investment services and insurance undertakings, or inspectors acting on behalf of those departments. That disclosure shall be made only where necessary for reasons of prudential control, and prevention and resolution of failing IORPs. Without prejudice to paragraph 2 of this Article, persons having access to the information shall be subject to professional secrecy requirements at least equivalent to those set out in this Directive. Member States shall, however, provide the information received under Article 55, and information obtained by means of on-site verification may only be disclosed with the express consent of the competent authority from which the information originated or of the competent authority of the Member State in which the on-site verification was carried out. 2. Member States may authorise the disclosure of confidential information relating to the prudential supervision of IORPs to parliamentary enquiry committees or courts of auditors in their Member State and other entities in charge of enquiries in their Member State, where all of the following conditions are fulfilled: (a) the entities have the competence under national law to investigate or scrutinise the actions of authorities responsible for the supervision of IORPs or for laws on such supervision; (b) the information is strictly necessary for fulfilling the competence referred to in point (a); (c) the persons with access to the information are subject to professional secrecy requirements under national law at least equivalent to those set out in this Directive; (d) if the information originates from another Member State, that information is disclosed with the explicit agreement of the originating competent authorities and solely for the purposes for which those authorities gave their agreement.
Amendment rationale: CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL Reasons for and objectives of the proposal The establishment of a European Single Access Point (ESAP) by 2024 is a flagship action of the Capital Markets Union (CMU) Action Plan adopted by the European Commission in September 2020 1 . ESAP will contribute to the achievement of the CMU’s objectives by providing EU-wide access to information published by entities that is relevant to capital markets, financial services and sustainable finance, i.e. mainly information about their economic activities and products. ESAP will provide access to this information in an efficient and non-discriminatory manner. Information about entities’ activities and products is essential for decision-making by providers of capital. ESAP will contribute to further integrating the financial services and capital markets in the single market, to allocating capital more efficiently across the EU and promoting the development of smaller national capital markets and economies by giving them greater visibility. ESAP will also allow non-listed entities including Small and Medium-Sized enterprises (SMEs) to make available information on a voluntary basis. This will facilitate their access to capital. This proposal is part of a package comprised of: · a proposal for a Regulation establishing a European Single Access Point; · a proposal for a Directive amending certain Directives (this proposal); and · a proposal for a Regulation amending certain Regulations. Amendments to certain Directives are necessary to achieve the above objectives to contribute to the integration of the single market, particularly as regards the collection of information to be made available to ESAP. 
Revised version (Article 57 Disclosure of information to government administrations responsible for financial legislation):
1. Articles 52(1), 53 and 58(1) shall not preclude Member States from authorising the disclosure of confidential information between competent authorities and other departments of their central government administrations responsible for the enforcement of legislation on the supervision of IORPs, credit institutions, financial institutions, investment services and insurance undertakings, or inspectors acting on behalf of those departments. That disclosure shall be made only where necessary for reasons of prudential control, and prevention and resolution of failing IORPs. Without prejudice to paragraph 2 of this Article, persons having access to the information shall be subject to professional secrecy requirements at least equivalent to those set out in this Directive. Member States shall, however, provide the information received under Article 55, and information obtained by means of on-site verification may only be disclosed with the express consent of the competent authority from which the information originated or of the competent authority of the Member State in which the on-site verification was carried out.
Article 58 Conditions for the exchange of information
1. For exchanges of information under Articles 55, transmission of information under Article 56 and disclosure of information under Article 57, Member States shall require that at least the following conditions are met: (a) the information shall be exchanged, transmitted or disclosed for the purpose of carrying out oversight or supervision; (b) the information received shall be subject to the obligation of professional secrecy laid down in Article 52; (c) where the information originates from another Member State, it shall not be disclosed without the express agreement of the competent authority from which it originates and, where appropriate, solely for the purposes for which that authority gave its agreement. 2. Article 53 shall not preclude Member States from authorising, with the aim of strengthening the stability, and integrity, of the financial system, the exchange of information between the competent authorities and the authorities or bodies responsible for the detection and investigation of breaches of company law applicable to sponsoring undertakings. Member States which apply the first subparagraph shall require that at least the following conditions are met: (a) the information must be intended for the purpose of detection, and investigation and scrutiny as referred to in point (a) of Article 57(2); (b) information received must be subject to the obligation of professional secrecy laid down in Article 52; (c) where the information originates from another Member State, it shall not be disclosed without the express agreement of the competent authority from which it originates and, where appropriate, solely for the purposes for which that authority gave its agreement. 3. Where, in a Member State, the authorities or bodies referred to in the first subparagraph of paragraph 2 perform their task of detection or investigation with the aid of persons appointed, in view of their specific competence, for that purpose and not employed in the public sector, the possibility of exchanging information provided for in Article 57(2) shall apply.
Amendment rationale: CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL Reasons for and objectives of the proposal The establishment of a European Single Access Point (ESAP) by 2024 is a flagship action of the Capital Markets Union (CMU) Action Plan adopted by the European Commission in September 2020 1 . ESAP will contribute to the achievement of the CMU’s objectives by providing EU-wide access to information published by entities that is relevant to capital markets, financial services and sustainable finance, i.e. mainly information about their economic activities and products. ESAP will provide access to this information in an efficient and non-discriminatory manner. Information about entities’ activities and products is essential for decision-making by providers of capital. ESAP will contribute to further integrating the financial services and capital markets in the single market, to allocating capital more efficiently across the EU and promoting the development of smaller national capital markets and economies by giving them greater visibility. ESAP will also allow non-listed entities including Small and Medium-Sized enterprises (SMEs) to make available information on a voluntary basis. This will facilitate their access to capital. This proposal is part of a package comprised of: · a proposal for a Regulation establishing a European Single Access Point; · a proposal for a Directive amending certain Directives (this proposal); and · a proposal for a Regulation amending certain Regulations. Amendments to certain Directives are necessary to achieve the above objectives to contribute to the integration of the single market, particularly as regards the collection of information to be made available to ESAP. 
Revised version (Article 58 Conditions for the exchange of information):
2. Article 53 shall not preclude Member States from authorising, with the aim of strengthening the stability, and integrity, of the financial system, the exchange of information between the competent authorities and the authorities or bodies responsible for the detection and investigation of breaches of company law applicable to sponsoring undertakings. Member States which apply the first subparagraph shall require that at least the following conditions are met: (b) information received must be subject to the obligation of professional secrecy laid down in Article 52; (c) where the information originates from another Member State, it shall not be disclosed without the express agreement of the competent authority from which it originates and, where appropriate, solely for the purposes for which that authority gave its agreement. 3. Where, in a Member State, the authorities or bodies referred to in the first subparagraph of paragraph 2 perform their task of detection or investigation with the aid of persons appointed, in view of their specific competence, for that purpose and not employed in the public sector, the possibility of exchanging information provided for in Article 57(2) shall apply.