Article 1 Subject matter
This Directive establishes minimum rules concerning the definition of criminal offences and sanctions in the area of trafficking in human beings. It also introduces common provisions, taking into account the gender perspective, to strengthen the prevention of this crime and the protection of the victims thereof.
Article 2 Offences concerning trafficking in human beings
1. Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that the following intentional acts are punishable: The recruitment, transportation, transfer, harbouring or reception of persons, including the exchange or transfer of control over those persons, by means of the threat or use of force or other forms of coercion, of abduction, of fraud, of deception, of the abuse of power or of a position of vulnerability or of the giving or receiving of payments or benefits to achieve the consent of a person having control over another person, for the purpose of exploitation. 2. A position of vulnerability means a situation in which the person concerned has no real or acceptable alternative but to submit to the abuse involved. 3. Exploitation shall include, as a minimum, the exploitation of the prostitution of others or other forms of sexual exploitation, forced labour or services, including begging, slavery or practices similar to slavery, servitude, or the exploitation of criminal activities, or the removal of organs. 4. The consent of a victim of trafficking in human beings to the exploitation, whether intended or actual, shall be irrelevant where any of the means set forth in paragraph 1 has been used. 5. When the conduct referred to in paragraph 1 involves a child, it shall be a punishable offence of trafficking in human beings even if none of the means set forth in paragraph 1 has been used. 6. For the purpose of this Directive, ‘child’ shall mean any person below 18 years of age.
Amendment rationale: CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL Reasons for and objectives of the proposal This proposal sets out a series of measures to better prevent and combat trafficking in human beings and to protect its victims under the legal framework in pl ace in the Union , namely Directive 2011/36/EU 1 ( “ the Anti-trafficking Directive ” ). The Anti-trafficking Directive provides an overarching EU framework to prevent and combat trafficking in human beings by establishing minimum rules concerning the definition of criminal offences and sanctions in the area of trafficking in human beings , and by introducing provisions to strengthen the prevention of this crime an d the protection of the victims , while taking into account the gender perspective 2 . The Directive provides EU common rules on : (i) criminalisation, investigation and prosecution of trafficking in human beings, including the definition of offences, penalties and sanctions; (ii) assistance and support to, and protection of, victims of trafficking in human beings; and (iii) prevention of trafficking in human beings 3 . The adoption of the Anti-trafficking Directive in April 2011 was a key development towards enhancing EU efforts to prevent and combat trafficking in human beings, and to protect its victims. It was a crucial step towards harmonisation of the relevant rules across the Member States. However, a number of challenges have arisen or gained importance since 2011. These are addressed through this targeted revision of the Directive. The correct and complete transposition of the Directive and its full implementation remain s a priority for the Commission. Following the adoption of the transposition report 4 t he Commission continued the engagement with the Member State s and committed to use the powers conferred to it by the Treaties to ensure full transposition and implementation of its provisions . By taking a multi-disciplinary and comprehensive approach , the Commission adopted the EU Strategy on combatting trafficking in human beings 2021-2025 5 set ting out detailed actions aimed at improving the implement at i on of the relevant provisions of Directive 2011/36/EU . It provides a robust policy response to combatting trafficking in human beings, from prevention through to protection of victims, to prosecution and conviction of traffickers. The forms of exploitation have evolved since 2011 . S exual and labour exploitation have consistently been the main purposes of trafficking in human beings . Trafficking for sexual exploitation has continuously been the most prevalent form of exploitation in the EU accounting for over a half of all victims and affecting predominantly women and girls 6 . Trafficking for the purpose of labour exploitation has been the second most frequent form of trafficking in the EU , with the number of victims rapidly increasing and nearly doubling in the last five years 7 . However , trafficking for other purposes has gained more prominence over time both as regards forms of exploitation already included in the Anti-trafficking Directive ( begging, exploitation of criminal activities and the removal of organs) as well as forms not explicitly mentioned therein (including forced marriage and illegal adoption) . The overall percentage of other purposes of exploitation represents more than 10% of all victims . This proposal seeks to expand the non-exhaustive list of forms of exploitation explicitly mentioned in the Directive as to include forced marriage and illegal adoption , in order to ensure that national legal systems cover an increasing number of trafficking purposes . The modi operandi of traffickers, who often operate in the framework of organised crime, have also evolved resulting in an increased threat of trafficking in human beings. Advances in technology allow traffickers to recruit, advertise and exploit victims remotely, and to widely share exploitative materials online. The same technological means make it more difficult to detect the crime, identify the perpetrators, and track down the money used to commit offences and the profits generated by the crime. This proposal seeks to address the challenges posed by the increasing digitalisation of trafficking in human beings and to enhance the criminal law response to technology-facilitated offences. Especially in recent years, relevant stakeholders, including EU Agencies, law enforcement and judicial authorities, international and civil society organisations, have highlighted the concern of the growing number of trafficking offences committed or facilitated by means of information and communication technologies. The optional regime of sanctions on legal persons currently in force, as well as the extent to which it is transposed and applied in Member States, does not sufficiently meet the aims of the Anti-trafficking Directive. While still ensuring that sanctions are effective, proportionate and dissuasive, this proposal seeks to enhance the criminal justice response to trafficking offences committed for the benefit of legal persons by replacing the optional regime of sanctions with two different mandatory regimes that apply in case of standard offences and of aggravated offences. The adoption of the Anti-trafficking Directive in 2011 pre-dates the EU legal framework on freezing and confiscation. Therefore, the Commission proposes to update the reference to tracing, freezing, management and confiscation of proceeds by making explicit reference to the EU rules on these matters. Substantial room for improvement remains in the early identification and referral practices of Member States, both at the national and cross-border levels. In particular, not all Member States have a national referral mechanism in place and the structure and functioning of such mechanisms varies considerably across Member States. This proposal seeks to ensure that all Member States establish by laws, regulations or administrative provisions national referral mechanism, with a view to streamlining the functioning of relevant national institutions and to bringing further harmonisation in their structures and practices on referral to victims to appropriate assistance and support systems. This will also constitute the first step towards the establishment of a European Referral Mechanism. The information gathered from recent studies and consultations with relevant stakeholders show that the demand that fosters trafficking has not decreased despite the wealth of relevant education, training and awareness raising activities, and the transposition of Article 18(4) of the Anti-trafficking Directive in a number of Member States. Despite all multi-stakeholder efforts, the demand for sexual services, cheap labour and products persists. This, in turn, fuels trafficking for the purpose of sexual and labour exploitation. This proposal aims to bring further harmonisation across Member States’ with a view to reducing demand. The proposal also recognises that criminal law is only part of the demand reduction response, and it should continue to be accompanied by education, training and awareness raising activities, in line with the Anti-trafficking Directive. Trafficking in human beings is a complex crime. In order to address it appropriately, it is crucial to rely on coherent and reliable data. Similarly to other crime areas, it is estimated that an important part of trafficking cases is not reported. This is one of the factors hampering full understanding of the scope of trafficking in human beings within the EU. In addition, there are important gaps in the data collection on reported cases, and statistics gathered by the Commission are made public with substantial delay after the reporting period. This proposal aims to require Member States to collect and report to the Commission data on trafficking in human beings every year, and to further harmonise data collection, with a view to enhancing its quality and accelerating the publication of data reports.
Revised version (Article 2 Offences concerning trafficking in human beings):
1. Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that the following intentional acts are punishable: The recruitment, transportation, transfer, harbouring or reception of persons, including the exchange or transfer of control over those persons, by means of the threat or use of force or other forms of coercion, of abduction, of fraud, of deception, of the abuse of power or of a position of vulnerability or of the giving or receiving of payments or benefits to achieve the consent of a person having control over another person, for the purpose of exploitation. 2. A position of vulnerability means a situation in which the person concerned has no real or acceptable alternative but to submit to the abuse involved. 3. Exploitation shall include, as a minimum, the exploitation of the prostitution of others or other forms of sexual exploitation, forced labour or services, including begging, slavery or practices similar to slavery, servitude, or the exploitation of criminal activities, or the removal of organs, or the exploitation of surrogacy, of forced marriage, or of illegal adoption. 4. The consent of a victim of trafficking in human beings to the exploitation, whether intended or actual, shall be irrelevant where any of the means set forth in paragraph 1 has been used. 5. When the conduct referred to in paragraph 1 involves a child, it shall be a punishable offence of trafficking in human beings even if none of the means set forth in paragraph 1 has been used. This paragraph shall not apply to the exploitation of surrogacy as referred to in paragraph 3, unless the surrogate mother is a child. 6. For the purpose of this Directive, ‘child’ shall mean any person below 18 years of age.
Article 3 Incitement, aiding and abetting, and attempt
Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that inciting, aiding and abetting or attempting to commit an offence referred to in Article 2 is punishable.
Article 4 Penalties
1. Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that an offence referred to in Article 2 is punishable by a maximum penalty of at least five years of imprisonment. 2. Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that an offence referred to in Article 2 is punishable by a maximum penalty of at least 10 years of imprisonment where that offence: (a) was committed against a victim who was particularly vulnerable, which, in the context of this Directive, shall include at least child victims; (b) was committed within the framework of a criminal organisation within the meaning of Council Framework Decision 2008/841/JHA of 24 October 2008 on the fight against organised crime ( 15 ) ; (c) deliberately or by gross negligence endangered the life of the victim; or (d) was committed by use of serious violence or has caused particularly serious harm to the victim. 3. Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that the fact that an offence referred to in Article 2 was committed by public officials in the performance of their duties is regarded as an aggravating circumstance. 4. Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that an offence referred to in Article 3 is punishable by effective, proportionate and dissuasive penalties, which may entail surrender.
Amendment rationale: CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL Reasons for and objectives of the proposal This proposal sets out a series of measures to better prevent and combat trafficking in human beings and to protect its victims under the legal framework in pl ace in the Union , namely Directive 2011/36/EU 1 ( “ the Anti-trafficking Directive ” ). The Anti-trafficking Directive provides an overarching EU framework to prevent and combat trafficking in human beings by establishing minimum rules concerning the definition of criminal offences and sanctions in the area of trafficking in human beings , and by introducing provisions to strengthen the prevention of this crime an d the protection of the victims , while taking into account the gender perspective 2 . The Directive provides EU common rules on : (i) criminalisation, investigation and prosecution of trafficking in human beings, including the definition of offences, penalties and sanctions; (ii) assistance and support to, and protection of, victims of trafficking in human beings; and (iii) prevention of trafficking in human beings 3 . The adoption of the Anti-trafficking Directive in April 2011 was a key development towards enhancing EU efforts to prevent and combat trafficking in human beings, and to protect its victims. It was a crucial step towards harmonisation of the relevant rules across the Member States. However, a number of challenges have arisen or gained importance since 2011. These are addressed through this targeted revision of the Directive. The correct and complete transposition of the Directive and its full implementation remain s a priority for the Commission. Following the adoption of the transposition report 4 t he Commission continued the engagement with the Member State s and committed to use the powers conferred to it by the Treaties to ensure full transposition and implementation of its provisions . By taking a multi-disciplinary and comprehensive approach , the Commission adopted the EU Strategy on combatting trafficking in human beings 2021-2025 5 set ting out detailed actions aimed at improving the implement at i on of the relevant provisions of Directive 2011/36/EU . It provides a robust policy response to combatting trafficking in human beings, from prevention through to protection of victims, to prosecution and conviction of traffickers. The forms of exploitation have evolved since 2011 . S exual and labour exploitation have consistently been the main purposes of trafficking in human beings . Trafficking for sexual exploitation has continuously been the most prevalent form of exploitation in the EU accounting for over a half of all victims and affecting predominantly women and girls 6 . Trafficking for the purpose of labour exploitation has been the second most frequent form of trafficking in the EU , with the number of victims rapidly increasing and nearly doubling in the last five years 7 . However , trafficking for other purposes has gained more prominence over time both as regards forms of exploitation already included in the Anti-trafficking Directive ( begging, exploitation of criminal activities and the removal of organs) as well as forms not explicitly mentioned therein (including forced marriage and illegal adoption) . The overall percentage of other purposes of exploitation represents more than 10% of all victims . This proposal seeks to expand the non-exhaustive list of forms of exploitation explicitly mentioned in the Directive as to include forced marriage and illegal adoption , in order to ensure that national legal systems cover an increasing number of trafficking purposes . The modi operandi of traffickers, who often operate in the framework of organised crime, have also evolved resulting in an increased threat of trafficking in human beings. Advances in technology allow traffickers to recruit, advertise and exploit victims remotely, and to widely share exploitative materials online. The same technological means make it more difficult to detect the crime, identify the perpetrators, and track down the money used to commit offences and the profits generated by the crime. This proposal seeks to address the challenges posed by the increasing digitalisation of trafficking in human beings and to enhance the criminal law response to technology-facilitated offences. Especially in recent years, relevant stakeholders, including EU Agencies, law enforcement and judicial authorities, international and civil society organisations, have highlighted the concern of the growing number of trafficking offences committed or facilitated by means of information and communication technologies. The optional regime of sanctions on legal persons currently in force, as well as the extent to which it is transposed and applied in Member States, does not sufficiently meet the aims of the Anti-trafficking Directive. While still ensuring that sanctions are effective, proportionate and dissuasive, this proposal seeks to enhance the criminal justice response to trafficking offences committed for the benefit of legal persons by replacing the optional regime of sanctions with two different mandatory regimes that apply in case of standard offences and of aggravated offences. The adoption of the Anti-trafficking Directive in 2011 pre-dates the EU legal framework on freezing and confiscation. Therefore, the Commission proposes to update the reference to tracing, freezing, management and confiscation of proceeds by making explicit reference to the EU rules on these matters. Substantial room for improvement remains in the early identification and referral practices of Member States, both at the national and cross-border levels. In particular, not all Member States have a national referral mechanism in place and the structure and functioning of such mechanisms varies considerably across Member States. This proposal seeks to ensure that all Member States establish by laws, regulations or administrative provisions national referral mechanism, with a view to streamlining the functioning of relevant national institutions and to bringing further harmonisation in their structures and practices on referral to victims to appropriate assistance and support systems. This will also constitute the first step towards the establishment of a European Referral Mechanism. The information gathered from recent studies and consultations with relevant stakeholders show that the demand that fosters trafficking has not decreased despite the wealth of relevant education, training and awareness raising activities, and the transposition of Article 18(4) of the Anti-trafficking Directive in a number of Member States. Despite all multi-stakeholder efforts, the demand for sexual services, cheap labour and products persists. This, in turn, fuels trafficking for the purpose of sexual and labour exploitation. This proposal aims to bring further harmonisation across Member States’ with a view to reducing demand. The proposal also recognises that criminal law is only part of the demand reduction response, and it should continue to be accompanied by education, training and awareness raising activities, in line with the Anti-trafficking Directive. Trafficking in human beings is a complex crime. In order to address it appropriately, it is crucial to rely on coherent and reliable data. Similarly to other crime areas, it is estimated that an important part of trafficking cases is not reported. This is one of the factors hampering full understanding of the scope of trafficking in human beings within the EU. In addition, there are important gaps in the data collection on reported cases, and statistics gathered by the Commission are made public with substantial delay after the reporting period. This proposal aims to require Member States to collect and report to the Commission data on trafficking in human beings every year, and to further harmonise data collection, with a view to enhancing its quality and accelerating the publication of data reports.
Revised version (Article 4 Penalties):
1. Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that an offence referred to in Article 2 is punishable by a maximum penalty of at least five years of imprisonment. 3. Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that, where they relate to an offence referred to in Article 2, the following, in accordance with relevant provisions of the national law, are regarded as aggravating circumstances: (a) the fact that the offence was committed by public officials in the performance of their duties; (b) the fact that the perpetrator facilitated or committed, by means of information and communication technologies, the dissemination of images or videos or similar material of a sexual nature involving the victim. 4. Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that an offence referred to in Article 3 is punishable by effective, proportionate and dissuasive penalties, which may entail surrender.
Article 5 Liability of legal persons
1. Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that legal persons can be held liable for the offences referred to in Articles 2 and 3 committed for their benefit by any person, acting either individually or as part of an organ of the legal person, who has a leading position within the legal person, based on: (a) a power of representation of the legal person; (b) an authority to take decisions on behalf of the legal person; or (c) an authority to exercise control within the legal person. 2. Member States shall also ensure that a legal person can be held liable where the lack of supervision or control, by a person referred to in paragraph 1, has made possible the commission of the offences referred to in Articles 2 and 3 for the benefit of that legal person by a person under its authority. 3. Liability of a legal person under paragraphs 1 and 2 shall not exclude criminal proceedings against natural persons who are perpetrators, inciters or accessories in the offences referred to in Articles 2 and 3. 4. For the purpose of this Directive, ‘legal person’ shall mean any entity having legal personality under the applicable law, except for States or public bodies in the exercise of State authority and for public international organisations.
Amendment rationale: CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL Reasons for and objectives of the proposal This proposal sets out a series of measures to better prevent and combat trafficking in human beings and to protect its victims under the legal framework in pl ace in the Union , namely Directive 2011/36/EU 1 ( “ the Anti-trafficking Directive ” ). The Anti-trafficking Directive provides an overarching EU framework to prevent and combat trafficking in human beings by establishing minimum rules concerning the definition of criminal offences and sanctions in the area of trafficking in human beings , and by introducing provisions to strengthen the prevention of this crime an d the protection of the victims , while taking into account the gender perspective 2 . The Directive provides EU common rules on : (i) criminalisation, investigation and prosecution of trafficking in human beings, including the definition of offences, penalties and sanctions; (ii) assistance and support to, and protection of, victims of trafficking in human beings; and (iii) prevention of trafficking in human beings 3 . The adoption of the Anti-trafficking Directive in April 2011 was a key development towards enhancing EU efforts to prevent and combat trafficking in human beings, and to protect its victims. It was a crucial step towards harmonisation of the relevant rules across the Member States. However, a number of challenges have arisen or gained importance since 2011. These are addressed through this targeted revision of the Directive. The correct and complete transposition of the Directive and its full implementation remain s a priority for the Commission. Following the adoption of the transposition report 4 t he Commission continued the engagement with the Member State s and committed to use the powers conferred to it by the Treaties to ensure full transposition and implementation of its provisions . By taking a multi-disciplinary and comprehensive approach , the Commission adopted the EU Strategy on combatting trafficking in human beings 2021-2025 5 set ting out detailed actions aimed at improving the implement at i on of the relevant provisions of Directive 2011/36/EU . It provides a robust policy response to combatting trafficking in human beings, from prevention through to protection of victims, to prosecution and conviction of traffickers. The forms of exploitation have evolved since 2011 . S exual and labour exploitation have consistently been the main purposes of trafficking in human beings . Trafficking for sexual exploitation has continuously been the most prevalent form of exploitation in the EU accounting for over a half of all victims and affecting predominantly women and girls 6 . Trafficking for the purpose of labour exploitation has been the second most frequent form of trafficking in the EU , with the number of victims rapidly increasing and nearly doubling in the last five years 7 . However , trafficking for other purposes has gained more prominence over time both as regards forms of exploitation already included in the Anti-trafficking Directive ( begging, exploitation of criminal activities and the removal of organs) as well as forms not explicitly mentioned therein (including forced marriage and illegal adoption) . The overall percentage of other purposes of exploitation represents more than 10% of all victims . This proposal seeks to expand the non-exhaustive list of forms of exploitation explicitly mentioned in the Directive as to include forced marriage and illegal adoption , in order to ensure that national legal systems cover an increasing number of trafficking purposes . The modi operandi of traffickers, who often operate in the framework of organised crime, have also evolved resulting in an increased threat of trafficking in human beings. Advances in technology allow traffickers to recruit, advertise and exploit victims remotely, and to widely share exploitative materials online. The same technological means make it more difficult to detect the crime, identify the perpetrators, and track down the money used to commit offences and the profits generated by the crime. This proposal seeks to address the challenges posed by the increasing digitalisation of trafficking in human beings and to enhance the criminal law response to technology-facilitated offences. Especially in recent years, relevant stakeholders, including EU Agencies, law enforcement and judicial authorities, international and civil society organisations, have highlighted the concern of the growing number of trafficking offences committed or facilitated by means of information and communication technologies. The optional regime of sanctions on legal persons currently in force, as well as the extent to which it is transposed and applied in Member States, does not sufficiently meet the aims of the Anti-trafficking Directive. While still ensuring that sanctions are effective, proportionate and dissuasive, this proposal seeks to enhance the criminal justice response to trafficking offences committed for the benefit of legal persons by replacing the optional regime of sanctions with two different mandatory regimes that apply in case of standard offences and of aggravated offences. The adoption of the Anti-trafficking Directive in 2011 pre-dates the EU legal framework on freezing and confiscation. Therefore, the Commission proposes to update the reference to tracing, freezing, management and confiscation of proceeds by making explicit reference to the EU rules on these matters. Substantial room for improvement remains in the early identification and referral practices of Member States, both at the national and cross-border levels. In particular, not all Member States have a national referral mechanism in place and the structure and functioning of such mechanisms varies considerably across Member States. This proposal seeks to ensure that all Member States establish by laws, regulations or administrative provisions national referral mechanism, with a view to streamlining the functioning of relevant national institutions and to bringing further harmonisation in their structures and practices on referral to victims to appropriate assistance and support systems. This will also constitute the first step towards the establishment of a European Referral Mechanism. The information gathered from recent studies and consultations with relevant stakeholders show that the demand that fosters trafficking has not decreased despite the wealth of relevant education, training and awareness raising activities, and the transposition of Article 18(4) of the Anti-trafficking Directive in a number of Member States. Despite all multi-stakeholder efforts, the demand for sexual services, cheap labour and products persists. This, in turn, fuels trafficking for the purpose of sexual and labour exploitation. This proposal aims to bring further harmonisation across Member States’ with a view to reducing demand. The proposal also recognises that criminal law is only part of the demand reduction response, and it should continue to be accompanied by education, training and awareness raising activities, in line with the Anti-trafficking Directive. Trafficking in human beings is a complex crime. In order to address it appropriately, it is crucial to rely on coherent and reliable data. Similarly to other crime areas, it is estimated that an important part of trafficking cases is not reported. This is one of the factors hampering full understanding of the scope of trafficking in human beings within the EU. In addition, there are important gaps in the data collection on reported cases, and statistics gathered by the Commission are made public with substantial delay after the reporting period. This proposal aims to require Member States to collect and report to the Commission data on trafficking in human beings every year, and to further harmonise data collection, with a view to enhancing its quality and accelerating the publication of data reports.
Revised version (Article 5 Liability of legal persons):
2. Member States shall also ensure that a legal person can be held liable where the lack of supervision or control, by a person referred to in paragraph 1, has made possible the commission of the offences referred to in Article 2, Article 3 and Article 18a(1) for the benefit of that legal person by a person under its authority. 3. Liability of a legal person under paragraphs 1 and 2 shall not exclude criminal proceedings against natural persons who are perpetrators of, inciters to, or accessories to the offences referred to in Article 2, Article 3 and Article 18a(1). 4. For the purpose of this Directive, ‘legal person’ shall mean any entity having legal personality under the applicable law, except for States or public bodies in the exercise of State authority and for public international organisations.
Article 6 Sanctions on legal persons
Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that a legal person held liable pursuant to Article 5(1) or (2) is subject to effective, proportionate and dissuasive sanctions, which shall include criminal or non-criminal fines and may include other sanctions, such as: (a) exclusion from entitlement to public benefits or aid; (b) temporary or permanent disqualification from the practice of commercial activities; (c) placing under judicial supervision; (d) judicial winding-up; (e) temporary or permanent closure of establishments which have been used for committing the offence.
Amendment rationale: CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL Reasons for and objectives of the proposal This proposal sets out a series of measures to better prevent and combat trafficking in human beings and to protect its victims under the legal framework in pl ace in the Union , namely Directive 2011/36/EU 1 ( “ the Anti-trafficking Directive ” ). The Anti-trafficking Directive provides an overarching EU framework to prevent and combat trafficking in human beings by establishing minimum rules concerning the definition of criminal offences and sanctions in the area of trafficking in human beings , and by introducing provisions to strengthen the prevention of this crime an d the protection of the victims , while taking into account the gender perspective 2 . The Directive provides EU common rules on : (i) criminalisation, investigation and prosecution of trafficking in human beings, including the definition of offences, penalties and sanctions; (ii) assistance and support to, and protection of, victims of trafficking in human beings; and (iii) prevention of trafficking in human beings 3 . The adoption of the Anti-trafficking Directive in April 2011 was a key development towards enhancing EU efforts to prevent and combat trafficking in human beings, and to protect its victims. It was a crucial step towards harmonisation of the relevant rules across the Member States. However, a number of challenges have arisen or gained importance since 2011. These are addressed through this targeted revision of the Directive. The correct and complete transposition of the Directive and its full implementation remain s a priority for the Commission. Following the adoption of the transposition report 4 t he Commission continued the engagement with the Member State s and committed to use the powers conferred to it by the Treaties to ensure full transposition and implementation of its provisions . By taking a multi-disciplinary and comprehensive approach , the Commission adopted the EU Strategy on combatting trafficking in human beings 2021-2025 5 set ting out detailed actions aimed at improving the implement at i on of the relevant provisions of Directive 2011/36/EU . It provides a robust policy response to combatting trafficking in human beings, from prevention through to protection of victims, to prosecution and conviction of traffickers. The forms of exploitation have evolved since 2011 . S exual and labour exploitation have consistently been the main purposes of trafficking in human beings . Trafficking for sexual exploitation has continuously been the most prevalent form of exploitation in the EU accounting for over a half of all victims and affecting predominantly women and girls 6 . Trafficking for the purpose of labour exploitation has been the second most frequent form of trafficking in the EU , with the number of victims rapidly increasing and nearly doubling in the last five years 7 . However , trafficking for other purposes has gained more prominence over time both as regards forms of exploitation already included in the Anti-trafficking Directive ( begging, exploitation of criminal activities and the removal of organs) as well as forms not explicitly mentioned therein (including forced marriage and illegal adoption) . The overall percentage of other purposes of exploitation represents more than 10% of all victims . This proposal seeks to expand the non-exhaustive list of forms of exploitation explicitly mentioned in the Directive as to include forced marriage and illegal adoption , in order to ensure that national legal systems cover an increasing number of trafficking purposes . The modi operandi of traffickers, who often operate in the framework of organised crime, have also evolved resulting in an increased threat of trafficking in human beings. Advances in technology allow traffickers to recruit, advertise and exploit victims remotely, and to widely share exploitative materials online. The same technological means make it more difficult to detect the crime, identify the perpetrators, and track down the money used to commit offences and the profits generated by the crime. This proposal seeks to address the challenges posed by the increasing digitalisation of trafficking in human beings and to enhance the criminal law response to technology-facilitated offences. Especially in recent years, relevant stakeholders, including EU Agencies, law enforcement and judicial authorities, international and civil society organisations, have highlighted the concern of the growing number of trafficking offences committed or facilitated by means of information and communication technologies. The optional regime of sanctions on legal persons currently in force, as well as the extent to which it is transposed and applied in Member States, does not sufficiently meet the aims of the Anti-trafficking Directive. While still ensuring that sanctions are effective, proportionate and dissuasive, this proposal seeks to enhance the criminal justice response to trafficking offences committed for the benefit of legal persons by replacing the optional regime of sanctions with two different mandatory regimes that apply in case of standard offences and of aggravated offences. The adoption of the Anti-trafficking Directive in 2011 pre-dates the EU legal framework on freezing and confiscation. Therefore, the Commission proposes to update the reference to tracing, freezing, management and confiscation of proceeds by making explicit reference to the EU rules on these matters. Substantial room for improvement remains in the early identification and referral practices of Member States, both at the national and cross-border levels. In particular, not all Member States have a national referral mechanism in place and the structure and functioning of such mechanisms varies considerably across Member States. This proposal seeks to ensure that all Member States establish by laws, regulations or administrative provisions national referral mechanism, with a view to streamlining the functioning of relevant national institutions and to bringing further harmonisation in their structures and practices on referral to victims to appropriate assistance and support systems. This will also constitute the first step towards the establishment of a European Referral Mechanism. The information gathered from recent studies and consultations with relevant stakeholders show that the demand that fosters trafficking has not decreased despite the wealth of relevant education, training and awareness raising activities, and the transposition of Article 18(4) of the Anti-trafficking Directive in a number of Member States. Despite all multi-stakeholder efforts, the demand for sexual services, cheap labour and products persists. This, in turn, fuels trafficking for the purpose of sexual and labour exploitation. This proposal aims to bring further harmonisation across Member States’ with a view to reducing demand. The proposal also recognises that criminal law is only part of the demand reduction response, and it should continue to be accompanied by education, training and awareness raising activities, in line with the Anti-trafficking Directive. Trafficking in human beings is a complex crime. In order to address it appropriately, it is crucial to rely on coherent and reliable data. Similarly to other crime areas, it is estimated that an important part of trafficking cases is not reported. This is one of the factors hampering full understanding of the scope of trafficking in human beings within the EU. In addition, there are important gaps in the data collection on reported cases, and statistics gathered by the Commission are made public with substantial delay after the reporting period. This proposal aims to require Member States to collect and report to the Commission data on trafficking in human beings every year, and to further harmonise data collection, with a view to enhancing its quality and accelerating the publication of data reports.
Revised version (Article 6 ):
1. Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that a legal person held liable pursuant to Article 5(1) or (2) is punishable by effective, proportionate and dissuasive criminal or non-criminal sanctions or measures.
Article 7 Seizure and confiscation
Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that their competent authorities are entitled to seize and confiscate instrumentalities and proceeds from the offences referred to in Articles 2 and 3.
Amendment rationale: CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL Reasons for and objectives of the proposal This proposal sets out a series of measures to better prevent and combat trafficking in human beings and to protect its victims under the legal framework in pl ace in the Union , namely Directive 2011/36/EU 1 ( “ the Anti-trafficking Directive ” ). The Anti-trafficking Directive provides an overarching EU framework to prevent and combat trafficking in human beings by establishing minimum rules concerning the definition of criminal offences and sanctions in the area of trafficking in human beings , and by introducing provisions to strengthen the prevention of this crime an d the protection of the victims , while taking into account the gender perspective 2 . The Directive provides EU common rules on : (i) criminalisation, investigation and prosecution of trafficking in human beings, including the definition of offences, penalties and sanctions; (ii) assistance and support to, and protection of, victims of trafficking in human beings; and (iii) prevention of trafficking in human beings 3 . The adoption of the Anti-trafficking Directive in April 2011 was a key development towards enhancing EU efforts to prevent and combat trafficking in human beings, and to protect its victims. It was a crucial step towards harmonisation of the relevant rules across the Member States. However, a number of challenges have arisen or gained importance since 2011. These are addressed through this targeted revision of the Directive. The correct and complete transposition of the Directive and its full implementation remain s a priority for the Commission. Following the adoption of the transposition report 4 t he Commission continued the engagement with the Member State s and committed to use the powers conferred to it by the Treaties to ensure full transposition and implementation of its provisions . By taking a multi-disciplinary and comprehensive approach , the Commission adopted the EU Strategy on combatting trafficking in human beings 2021-2025 5 set ting out detailed actions aimed at improving the implement at i on of the relevant provisions of Directive 2011/36/EU . It provides a robust policy response to combatting trafficking in human beings, from prevention through to protection of victims, to prosecution and conviction of traffickers. The forms of exploitation have evolved since 2011 . S exual and labour exploitation have consistently been the main purposes of trafficking in human beings . Trafficking for sexual exploitation has continuously been the most prevalent form of exploitation in the EU accounting for over a half of all victims and affecting predominantly women and girls 6 . Trafficking for the purpose of labour exploitation has been the second most frequent form of trafficking in the EU , with the number of victims rapidly increasing and nearly doubling in the last five years 7 . However , trafficking for other purposes has gained more prominence over time both as regards forms of exploitation already included in the Anti-trafficking Directive ( begging, exploitation of criminal activities and the removal of organs) as well as forms not explicitly mentioned therein (including forced marriage and illegal adoption) . The overall percentage of other purposes of exploitation represents more than 10% of all victims . This proposal seeks to expand the non-exhaustive list of forms of exploitation explicitly mentioned in the Directive as to include forced marriage and illegal adoption , in order to ensure that national legal systems cover an increasing number of trafficking purposes . The modi operandi of traffickers, who often operate in the framework of organised crime, have also evolved resulting in an increased threat of trafficking in human beings. Advances in technology allow traffickers to recruit, advertise and exploit victims remotely, and to widely share exploitative materials online. The same technological means make it more difficult to detect the crime, identify the perpetrators, and track down the money used to commit offences and the profits generated by the crime. This proposal seeks to address the challenges posed by the increasing digitalisation of trafficking in human beings and to enhance the criminal law response to technology-facilitated offences. Especially in recent years, relevant stakeholders, including EU Agencies, law enforcement and judicial authorities, international and civil society organisations, have highlighted the concern of the growing number of trafficking offences committed or facilitated by means of information and communication technologies. The optional regime of sanctions on legal persons currently in force, as well as the extent to which it is transposed and applied in Member States, does not sufficiently meet the aims of the Anti-trafficking Directive. While still ensuring that sanctions are effective, proportionate and dissuasive, this proposal seeks to enhance the criminal justice response to trafficking offences committed for the benefit of legal persons by replacing the optional regime of sanctions with two different mandatory regimes that apply in case of standard offences and of aggravated offences. The adoption of the Anti-trafficking Directive in 2011 pre-dates the EU legal framework on freezing and confiscation. Therefore, the Commission proposes to update the reference to tracing, freezing, management and confiscation of proceeds by making explicit reference to the EU rules on these matters. Substantial room for improvement remains in the early identification and referral practices of Member States, both at the national and cross-border levels. In particular, not all Member States have a national referral mechanism in place and the structure and functioning of such mechanisms varies considerably across Member States. This proposal seeks to ensure that all Member States establish by laws, regulations or administrative provisions national referral mechanism, with a view to streamlining the functioning of relevant national institutions and to bringing further harmonisation in their structures and practices on referral to victims to appropriate assistance and support systems. This will also constitute the first step towards the establishment of a European Referral Mechanism. The information gathered from recent studies and consultations with relevant stakeholders show that the demand that fosters trafficking has not decreased despite the wealth of relevant education, training and awareness raising activities, and the transposition of Article 18(4) of the Anti-trafficking Directive in a number of Member States. Despite all multi-stakeholder efforts, the demand for sexual services, cheap labour and products persists. This, in turn, fuels trafficking for the purpose of sexual and labour exploitation. This proposal aims to bring further harmonisation across Member States’ with a view to reducing demand. The proposal also recognises that criminal law is only part of the demand reduction response, and it should continue to be accompanied by education, training and awareness raising activities, in line with the Anti-trafficking Directive. Trafficking in human beings is a complex crime. In order to address it appropriately, it is crucial to rely on coherent and reliable data. Similarly to other crime areas, it is estimated that an important part of trafficking cases is not reported. This is one of the factors hampering full understanding of the scope of trafficking in human beings within the EU. In addition, there are important gaps in the data collection on reported cases, and statistics gathered by the Commission are made public with substantial delay after the reporting period. This proposal aims to require Member States to collect and report to the Commission data on trafficking in human beings every year, and to further harmonise data collection, with a view to enhancing its quality and accelerating the publication of data reports.
Article 8 Non-prosecution or non-application of penalties to the victim
Member States shall, in accordance with the basic principles of their legal systems, take the necessary measures to ensure that competent national authorities are entitled not to prosecute or impose penalties on victims of trafficking in human beings for their involvement in criminal activities which they have been compelled to commit as a direct consequence of being subjected to any of the acts referred to in Article 2.
Amendment rationale: CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL Reasons for and objectives of the proposal This proposal sets out a series of measures to better prevent and combat trafficking in human beings and to protect its victims under the legal framework in pl ace in the Union , namely Directive 2011/36/EU 1 ( “ the Anti-trafficking Directive ” ). The Anti-trafficking Directive provides an overarching EU framework to prevent and combat trafficking in human beings by establishing minimum rules concerning the definition of criminal offences and sanctions in the area of trafficking in human beings , and by introducing provisions to strengthen the prevention of this crime an d the protection of the victims , while taking into account the gender perspective 2 . The Directive provides EU common rules on : (i) criminalisation, investigation and prosecution of trafficking in human beings, including the definition of offences, penalties and sanctions; (ii) assistance and support to, and protection of, victims of trafficking in human beings; and (iii) prevention of trafficking in human beings 3 . The adoption of the Anti-trafficking Directive in April 2011 was a key development towards enhancing EU efforts to prevent and combat trafficking in human beings, and to protect its victims. It was a crucial step towards harmonisation of the relevant rules across the Member States. However, a number of challenges have arisen or gained importance since 2011. These are addressed through this targeted revision of the Directive. The correct and complete transposition of the Directive and its full implementation remain s a priority for the Commission. Following the adoption of the transposition report 4 t he Commission continued the engagement with the Member State s and committed to use the powers conferred to it by the Treaties to ensure full transposition and implementation of its provisions . By taking a multi-disciplinary and comprehensive approach , the Commission adopted the EU Strategy on combatting trafficking in human beings 2021-2025 5 set ting out detailed actions aimed at improving the implement at i on of the relevant provisions of Directive 2011/36/EU . It provides a robust policy response to combatting trafficking in human beings, from prevention through to protection of victims, to prosecution and conviction of traffickers. The forms of exploitation have evolved since 2011 . S exual and labour exploitation have consistently been the main purposes of trafficking in human beings . Trafficking for sexual exploitation has continuously been the most prevalent form of exploitation in the EU accounting for over a half of all victims and affecting predominantly women and girls 6 . Trafficking for the purpose of labour exploitation has been the second most frequent form of trafficking in the EU , with the number of victims rapidly increasing and nearly doubling in the last five years 7 . However , trafficking for other purposes has gained more prominence over time both as regards forms of exploitation already included in the Anti-trafficking Directive ( begging, exploitation of criminal activities and the removal of organs) as well as forms not explicitly mentioned therein (including forced marriage and illegal adoption) . The overall percentage of other purposes of exploitation represents more than 10% of all victims . This proposal seeks to expand the non-exhaustive list of forms of exploitation explicitly mentioned in the Directive as to include forced marriage and illegal adoption , in order to ensure that national legal systems cover an increasing number of trafficking purposes . The modi operandi of traffickers, who often operate in the framework of organised crime, have also evolved resulting in an increased threat of trafficking in human beings. Advances in technology allow traffickers to recruit, advertise and exploit victims remotely, and to widely share exploitative materials online. The same technological means make it more difficult to detect the crime, identify the perpetrators, and track down the money used to commit offences and the profits generated by the crime. This proposal seeks to address the challenges posed by the increasing digitalisation of trafficking in human beings and to enhance the criminal law response to technology-facilitated offences. Especially in recent years, relevant stakeholders, including EU Agencies, law enforcement and judicial authorities, international and civil society organisations, have highlighted the concern of the growing number of trafficking offences committed or facilitated by means of information and communication technologies. The optional regime of sanctions on legal persons currently in force, as well as the extent to which it is transposed and applied in Member States, does not sufficiently meet the aims of the Anti-trafficking Directive. While still ensuring that sanctions are effective, proportionate and dissuasive, this proposal seeks to enhance the criminal justice response to trafficking offences committed for the benefit of legal persons by replacing the optional regime of sanctions with two different mandatory regimes that apply in case of standard offences and of aggravated offences. The adoption of the Anti-trafficking Directive in 2011 pre-dates the EU legal framework on freezing and confiscation. Therefore, the Commission proposes to update the reference to tracing, freezing, management and confiscation of proceeds by making explicit reference to the EU rules on these matters. Substantial room for improvement remains in the early identification and referral practices of Member States, both at the national and cross-border levels. In particular, not all Member States have a national referral mechanism in place and the structure and functioning of such mechanisms varies considerably across Member States. This proposal seeks to ensure that all Member States establish by laws, regulations or administrative provisions national referral mechanism, with a view to streamlining the functioning of relevant national institutions and to bringing further harmonisation in their structures and practices on referral to victims to appropriate assistance and support systems. This will also constitute the first step towards the establishment of a European Referral Mechanism. The information gathered from recent studies and consultations with relevant stakeholders show that the demand that fosters trafficking has not decreased despite the wealth of relevant education, training and awareness raising activities, and the transposition of Article 18(4) of the Anti-trafficking Directive in a number of Member States. Despite all multi-stakeholder efforts, the demand for sexual services, cheap labour and products persists. This, in turn, fuels trafficking for the purpose of sexual and labour exploitation. This proposal aims to bring further harmonisation across Member States’ with a view to reducing demand. The proposal also recognises that criminal law is only part of the demand reduction response, and it should continue to be accompanied by education, training and awareness raising activities, in line with the Anti-trafficking Directive. Trafficking in human beings is a complex crime. In order to address it appropriately, it is crucial to rely on coherent and reliable data. Similarly to other crime areas, it is estimated that an important part of trafficking cases is not reported. This is one of the factors hampering full understanding of the scope of trafficking in human beings within the EU. In addition, there are important gaps in the data collection on reported cases, and statistics gathered by the Commission are made public with substantial delay after the reporting period. This proposal aims to require Member States to collect and report to the Commission data on trafficking in human beings every year, and to further harmonise data collection, with a view to enhancing its quality and accelerating the publication of data reports.
Revised version (Article 8 ):
Member States shall, in accordance with the basic principles of their legal systems, take the necessary measures to ensure that competent national authorities are entitled not to prosecute or impose penalties on victims of trafficking in human beings for their involvement in criminal or other unlawful activities which they have been compelled to commit as a direct consequence of being subjected to any of the acts referred to in Article 2.
Article 9 Investigation and prosecution
1. Member States shall ensure that investigation into or prosecution of offences referred to in Articles 2 and 3 is not dependent on reporting or accusation by a victim and that criminal proceedings may continue even if the victim has withdrawn his or her statement. 2. Member States shall take the necessary measures to enable, where the nature of the act calls for it, the prosecution of an offence referred to in Articles 2 and 3 for a sufficient period of time after the victim has reached the age of majority. 3. Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that persons, units or services responsible for investigating or prosecuting the offences referred to in Articles 2 and 3 are trained accordingly. 4. Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that effective investigative tools, such as those which are used in organised crime or other serious crime cases are available to persons, units or services responsible for investigating or prosecuting the offences referred to in Articles 2 and 3.
Amendment rationale: CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL Reasons for and objectives of the proposal This proposal sets out a series of measures to better prevent and combat trafficking in human beings and to protect its victims under the legal framework in pl ace in the Union , namely Directive 2011/36/EU 1 ( “ the Anti-trafficking Directive ” ). The Anti-trafficking Directive provides an overarching EU framework to prevent and combat trafficking in human beings by establishing minimum rules concerning the definition of criminal offences and sanctions in the area of trafficking in human beings , and by introducing provisions to strengthen the prevention of this crime an d the protection of the victims , while taking into account the gender perspective 2 . The Directive provides EU common rules on : (i) criminalisation, investigation and prosecution of trafficking in human beings, including the definition of offences, penalties and sanctions; (ii) assistance and support to, and protection of, victims of trafficking in human beings; and (iii) prevention of trafficking in human beings 3 . The adoption of the Anti-trafficking Directive in April 2011 was a key development towards enhancing EU efforts to prevent and combat trafficking in human beings, and to protect its victims. It was a crucial step towards harmonisation of the relevant rules across the Member States. However, a number of challenges have arisen or gained importance since 2011. These are addressed through this targeted revision of the Directive. The correct and complete transposition of the Directive and its full implementation remain s a priority for the Commission. Following the adoption of the transposition report 4 t he Commission continued the engagement with the Member State s and committed to use the powers conferred to it by the Treaties to ensure full transposition and implementation of its provisions . By taking a multi-disciplinary and comprehensive approach , the Commission adopted the EU Strategy on combatting trafficking in human beings 2021-2025 5 set ting out detailed actions aimed at improving the implement at i on of the relevant provisions of Directive 2011/36/EU . It provides a robust policy response to combatting trafficking in human beings, from prevention through to protection of victims, to prosecution and conviction of traffickers. The forms of exploitation have evolved since 2011 . S exual and labour exploitation have consistently been the main purposes of trafficking in human beings . Trafficking for sexual exploitation has continuously been the most prevalent form of exploitation in the EU accounting for over a half of all victims and affecting predominantly women and girls 6 . Trafficking for the purpose of labour exploitation has been the second most frequent form of trafficking in the EU , with the number of victims rapidly increasing and nearly doubling in the last five years 7 . However , trafficking for other purposes has gained more prominence over time both as regards forms of exploitation already included in the Anti-trafficking Directive ( begging, exploitation of criminal activities and the removal of organs) as well as forms not explicitly mentioned therein (including forced marriage and illegal adoption) . The overall percentage of other purposes of exploitation represents more than 10% of all victims . This proposal seeks to expand the non-exhaustive list of forms of exploitation explicitly mentioned in the Directive as to include forced marriage and illegal adoption , in order to ensure that national legal systems cover an increasing number of trafficking purposes . The modi operandi of traffickers, who often operate in the framework of organised crime, have also evolved resulting in an increased threat of trafficking in human beings. Advances in technology allow traffickers to recruit, advertise and exploit victims remotely, and to widely share exploitative materials online. The same technological means make it more difficult to detect the crime, identify the perpetrators, and track down the money used to commit offences and the profits generated by the crime. This proposal seeks to address the challenges posed by the increasing digitalisation of trafficking in human beings and to enhance the criminal law response to technology-facilitated offences. Especially in recent years, relevant stakeholders, including EU Agencies, law enforcement and judicial authorities, international and civil society organisations, have highlighted the concern of the growing number of trafficking offences committed or facilitated by means of information and communication technologies. The optional regime of sanctions on legal persons currently in force, as well as the extent to which it is transposed and applied in Member States, does not sufficiently meet the aims of the Anti-trafficking Directive. While still ensuring that sanctions are effective, proportionate and dissuasive, this proposal seeks to enhance the criminal justice response to trafficking offences committed for the benefit of legal persons by replacing the optional regime of sanctions with two different mandatory regimes that apply in case of standard offences and of aggravated offences. The adoption of the Anti-trafficking Directive in 2011 pre-dates the EU legal framework on freezing and confiscation. Therefore, the Commission proposes to update the reference to tracing, freezing, management and confiscation of proceeds by making explicit reference to the EU rules on these matters. Substantial room for improvement remains in the early identification and referral practices of Member States, both at the national and cross-border levels. In particular, not all Member States have a national referral mechanism in place and the structure and functioning of such mechanisms varies considerably across Member States. This proposal seeks to ensure that all Member States establish by laws, regulations or administrative provisions national referral mechanism, with a view to streamlining the functioning of relevant national institutions and to bringing further harmonisation in their structures and practices on referral to victims to appropriate assistance and support systems. This will also constitute the first step towards the establishment of a European Referral Mechanism. The information gathered from recent studies and consultations with relevant stakeholders show that the demand that fosters trafficking has not decreased despite the wealth of relevant education, training and awareness raising activities, and the transposition of Article 18(4) of the Anti-trafficking Directive in a number of Member States. Despite all multi-stakeholder efforts, the demand for sexual services, cheap labour and products persists. This, in turn, fuels trafficking for the purpose of sexual and labour exploitation. This proposal aims to bring further harmonisation across Member States’ with a view to reducing demand. The proposal also recognises that criminal law is only part of the demand reduction response, and it should continue to be accompanied by education, training and awareness raising activities, in line with the Anti-trafficking Directive. Trafficking in human beings is a complex crime. In order to address it appropriately, it is crucial to rely on coherent and reliable data. Similarly to other crime areas, it is estimated that an important part of trafficking cases is not reported. This is one of the factors hampering full understanding of the scope of trafficking in human beings within the EU. In addition, there are important gaps in the data collection on reported cases, and statistics gathered by the Commission are made public with substantial delay after the reporting period. This proposal aims to require Member States to collect and report to the Commission data on trafficking in human beings every year, and to further harmonise data collection, with a view to enhancing its quality and accelerating the publication of data reports.
Revised version (Article 9 Investigation and prosecution):
1. Member States shall ensure that investigation into or prosecution of offences referred to in Article 2, Article 3 and Article 18a(1) is not dependent on reporting or accusation by a victim, and that criminal proceedings may continue even if the victim has withdrawn his or her statement. 2. Member States shall take the necessary measures to enable, where the nature of the act calls for it, the prosecution of an offence referred to in Articles 2 and 3 for a sufficient period of time after the victim has reached the age of majority. 3. Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that persons, units or services responsible for investigating or prosecuting the offences referred to in Articles 2 and 3 are trained accordingly. Member States shall ensure that persons, units or services investigating and prosecuting the offences referred to in Articles 2 and 3, where those offences are committed or facilitated by means of information or communication technologies, have adequate expertise and technological capabilities. Member States are encouraged to create specialised units within law-enforcement and prosecution services, where appropriate and in accordance with their national legal systems. 4. Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that effective investigative tools, such as those which are used in organised crime or other serious crime cases are available to persons, units or services responsible for investigating or prosecuting the offences referred to in Articles 2 and 3.
Article 10 Jurisdiction
1. Member States shall take the necessary measures to establish their jurisdiction over the offences referred to in Articles 2 and 3 where: (a) the offence is committed in whole or in part within their territory; or (b) the offender is one of their nationals. 2. A Member State shall inform the Commission where it decides to establish further jurisdiction over the offences referred to in Articles 2 and 3 committed outside its territory, inter alia, where: (a) the offence is committed against one of its nationals or a person who is an habitual resident in its territory; (b) the offence is committed for the benefit of a legal person established in its territory; or (c) the offender is an habitual resident in its territory. 3. For the prosecution of the offences referred to in Articles 2 and 3 committed outside the territory of the Member State concerned, each Member State shall, in those cases referred to in point (b) of paragraph 1, and may, in those cases referred to in paragraph 2, take the necessary measures to ensure that its jurisdiction is not subject to either of the following conditions: (a) the acts are a criminal offence at the place where they were performed; or (b) the prosecution can be initiated only following a report made by the victim in the place where the offence was committed, or a denunciation from the State of the place where the offence was committed.
Amendment rationale: CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL Reasons for and objectives of the proposal This proposal sets out a series of measures to better prevent and combat trafficking in human beings and to protect its victims under the legal framework in pl ace in the Union , namely Directive 2011/36/EU 1 ( “ the Anti-trafficking Directive ” ). The Anti-trafficking Directive provides an overarching EU framework to prevent and combat trafficking in human beings by establishing minimum rules concerning the definition of criminal offences and sanctions in the area of trafficking in human beings , and by introducing provisions to strengthen the prevention of this crime an d the protection of the victims , while taking into account the gender perspective 2 . The Directive provides EU common rules on : (i) criminalisation, investigation and prosecution of trafficking in human beings, including the definition of offences, penalties and sanctions; (ii) assistance and support to, and protection of, victims of trafficking in human beings; and (iii) prevention of trafficking in human beings 3 . The adoption of the Anti-trafficking Directive in April 2011 was a key development towards enhancing EU efforts to prevent and combat trafficking in human beings, and to protect its victims. It was a crucial step towards harmonisation of the relevant rules across the Member States. However, a number of challenges have arisen or gained importance since 2011. These are addressed through this targeted revision of the Directive. The correct and complete transposition of the Directive and its full implementation remain s a priority for the Commission. Following the adoption of the transposition report 4 t he Commission continued the engagement with the Member State s and committed to use the powers conferred to it by the Treaties to ensure full transposition and implementation of its provisions . By taking a multi-disciplinary and comprehensive approach , the Commission adopted the EU Strategy on combatting trafficking in human beings 2021-2025 5 set ting out detailed actions aimed at improving the implement at i on of the relevant provisions of Directive 2011/36/EU . It provides a robust policy response to combatting trafficking in human beings, from prevention through to protection of victims, to prosecution and conviction of traffickers. The forms of exploitation have evolved since 2011 . S exual and labour exploitation have consistently been the main purposes of trafficking in human beings . Trafficking for sexual exploitation has continuously been the most prevalent form of exploitation in the EU accounting for over a half of all victims and affecting predominantly women and girls 6 . Trafficking for the purpose of labour exploitation has been the second most frequent form of trafficking in the EU , with the number of victims rapidly increasing and nearly doubling in the last five years 7 . However , trafficking for other purposes has gained more prominence over time both as regards forms of exploitation already included in the Anti-trafficking Directive ( begging, exploitation of criminal activities and the removal of organs) as well as forms not explicitly mentioned therein (including forced marriage and illegal adoption) . The overall percentage of other purposes of exploitation represents more than 10% of all victims . This proposal seeks to expand the non-exhaustive list of forms of exploitation explicitly mentioned in the Directive as to include forced marriage and illegal adoption , in order to ensure that national legal systems cover an increasing number of trafficking purposes . The modi operandi of traffickers, who often operate in the framework of organised crime, have also evolved resulting in an increased threat of trafficking in human beings. Advances in technology allow traffickers to recruit, advertise and exploit victims remotely, and to widely share exploitative materials online. The same technological means make it more difficult to detect the crime, identify the perpetrators, and track down the money used to commit offences and the profits generated by the crime. This proposal seeks to address the challenges posed by the increasing digitalisation of trafficking in human beings and to enhance the criminal law response to technology-facilitated offences. Especially in recent years, relevant stakeholders, including EU Agencies, law enforcement and judicial authorities, international and civil society organisations, have highlighted the concern of the growing number of trafficking offences committed or facilitated by means of information and communication technologies. The optional regime of sanctions on legal persons currently in force, as well as the extent to which it is transposed and applied in Member States, does not sufficiently meet the aims of the Anti-trafficking Directive. While still ensuring that sanctions are effective, proportionate and dissuasive, this proposal seeks to enhance the criminal justice response to trafficking offences committed for the benefit of legal persons by replacing the optional regime of sanctions with two different mandatory regimes that apply in case of standard offences and of aggravated offences. The adoption of the Anti-trafficking Directive in 2011 pre-dates the EU legal framework on freezing and confiscation. Therefore, the Commission proposes to update the reference to tracing, freezing, management and confiscation of proceeds by making explicit reference to the EU rules on these matters. Substantial room for improvement remains in the early identification and referral practices of Member States, both at the national and cross-border levels. In particular, not all Member States have a national referral mechanism in place and the structure and functioning of such mechanisms varies considerably across Member States. This proposal seeks to ensure that all Member States establish by laws, regulations or administrative provisions national referral mechanism, with a view to streamlining the functioning of relevant national institutions and to bringing further harmonisation in their structures and practices on referral to victims to appropriate assistance and support systems. This will also constitute the first step towards the establishment of a European Referral Mechanism. The information gathered from recent studies and consultations with relevant stakeholders show that the demand that fosters trafficking has not decreased despite the wealth of relevant education, training and awareness raising activities, and the transposition of Article 18(4) of the Anti-trafficking Directive in a number of Member States. Despite all multi-stakeholder efforts, the demand for sexual services, cheap labour and products persists. This, in turn, fuels trafficking for the purpose of sexual and labour exploitation. This proposal aims to bring further harmonisation across Member States’ with a view to reducing demand. The proposal also recognises that criminal law is only part of the demand reduction response, and it should continue to be accompanied by education, training and awareness raising activities, in line with the Anti-trafficking Directive. Trafficking in human beings is a complex crime. In order to address it appropriately, it is crucial to rely on coherent and reliable data. Similarly to other crime areas, it is estimated that an important part of trafficking cases is not reported. This is one of the factors hampering full understanding of the scope of trafficking in human beings within the EU. In addition, there are important gaps in the data collection on reported cases, and statistics gathered by the Commission are made public with substantial delay after the reporting period. This proposal aims to require Member States to collect and report to the Commission data on trafficking in human beings every year, and to further harmonise data collection, with a view to enhancing its quality and accelerating the publication of data reports.
Article 11 Assistance and support for victims of trafficking in human beings
1. Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that assistance and support are provided to victims before, during and for an appropriate period of time after the conclusion of criminal proceedings in order to enable them to exercise the rights set out in Framework Decision 2001/220/JHA, and in this Directive. 2. Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that a person is provided with assistance and support as soon as the competent authorities have a reasonable-grounds indication for believing that the person might have been subjected to any of the offences referred to in Articles 2 and 3. 3. Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that assistance and support for a victim are not made conditional on the victim’s willingness to cooperate in the criminal investigation, prosecution or trial, without prejudice to Directive 2004/81/EC or similar national rules. 4. Member States shall take the necessary measures to establish appropriate mechanisms aimed at the early identification of, assistance to and support for victims, in cooperation with relevant support organisations. 5. The assistance and support measures referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2 shall be provided on a consensual and informed basis, and shall include at least standards of living capable of ensuring victims’ subsistence through measures such as the provision of appropriate and safe accommodation and material assistance, as well as necessary medical treatment including psychological assistance, counselling and information, and translation and interpretation services where appropriate. 6. The information referred to in paragraph 5 shall cover, where relevant, information on a reflection and recovery period pursuant to Directive 2004/81/EC, and information on the possibility of granting international protection pursuant to Council Directive 2004/83/EC of 29 April 2004 on minimum standards for the qualification and status of third country nationals or stateless persons as refugees or as persons who otherwise need international protection and the content of the protection granted ( 16 ) and Council Directive 2005/85/EC of 1 December 2005 on minimum standards on procedures in Member States for granting and withdrawing refugee status ( 17 ) or pursuant to other international instruments or other similar national rules. 7. Member States shall attend to victims with special needs, where those needs derive, in particular, from whether they are pregnant, their health, a disability, a mental or psychological disorder they have, or a serious form of psychological, physical or sexual violence they have suffered.
Amendment rationale: CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL Reasons for and objectives of the proposal This proposal sets out a series of measures to better prevent and combat trafficking in human beings and to protect its victims under the legal framework in pl ace in the Union , namely Directive 2011/36/EU 1 ( “ the Anti-trafficking Directive ” ). The Anti-trafficking Directive provides an overarching EU framework to prevent and combat trafficking in human beings by establishing minimum rules concerning the definition of criminal offences and sanctions in the area of trafficking in human beings , and by introducing provisions to strengthen the prevention of this crime an d the protection of the victims , while taking into account the gender perspective 2 . The Directive provides EU common rules on : (i) criminalisation, investigation and prosecution of trafficking in human beings, including the definition of offences, penalties and sanctions; (ii) assistance and support to, and protection of, victims of trafficking in human beings; and (iii) prevention of trafficking in human beings 3 . The adoption of the Anti-trafficking Directive in April 2011 was a key development towards enhancing EU efforts to prevent and combat trafficking in human beings, and to protect its victims. It was a crucial step towards harmonisation of the relevant rules across the Member States. However, a number of challenges have arisen or gained importance since 2011. These are addressed through this targeted revision of the Directive. The correct and complete transposition of the Directive and its full implementation remain s a priority for the Commission. Following the adoption of the transposition report 4 t he Commission continued the engagement with the Member State s and committed to use the powers conferred to it by the Treaties to ensure full transposition and implementation of its provisions . By taking a multi-disciplinary and comprehensive approach , the Commission adopted the EU Strategy on combatting trafficking in human beings 2021-2025 5 set ting out detailed actions aimed at improving the implement at i on of the relevant provisions of Directive 2011/36/EU . It provides a robust policy response to combatting trafficking in human beings, from prevention through to protection of victims, to prosecution and conviction of traffickers. The forms of exploitation have evolved since 2011 . S exual and labour exploitation have consistently been the main purposes of trafficking in human beings . Trafficking for sexual exploitation has continuously been the most prevalent form of exploitation in the EU accounting for over a half of all victims and affecting predominantly women and girls 6 . Trafficking for the purpose of labour exploitation has been the second most frequent form of trafficking in the EU , with the number of victims rapidly increasing and nearly doubling in the last five years 7 . However , trafficking for other purposes has gained more prominence over time both as regards forms of exploitation already included in the Anti-trafficking Directive ( begging, exploitation of criminal activities and the removal of organs) as well as forms not explicitly mentioned therein (including forced marriage and illegal adoption) . The overall percentage of other purposes of exploitation represents more than 10% of all victims . This proposal seeks to expand the non-exhaustive list of forms of exploitation explicitly mentioned in the Directive as to include forced marriage and illegal adoption , in order to ensure that national legal systems cover an increasing number of trafficking purposes . The modi operandi of traffickers, who often operate in the framework of organised crime, have also evolved resulting in an increased threat of trafficking in human beings. Advances in technology allow traffickers to recruit, advertise and exploit victims remotely, and to widely share exploitative materials online. The same technological means make it more difficult to detect the crime, identify the perpetrators, and track down the money used to commit offences and the profits generated by the crime. This proposal seeks to address the challenges posed by the increasing digitalisation of trafficking in human beings and to enhance the criminal law response to technology-facilitated offences. Especially in recent years, relevant stakeholders, including EU Agencies, law enforcement and judicial authorities, international and civil society organisations, have highlighted the concern of the growing number of trafficking offences committed or facilitated by means of information and communication technologies. The optional regime of sanctions on legal persons currently in force, as well as the extent to which it is transposed and applied in Member States, does not sufficiently meet the aims of the Anti-trafficking Directive. While still ensuring that sanctions are effective, proportionate and dissuasive, this proposal seeks to enhance the criminal justice response to trafficking offences committed for the benefit of legal persons by replacing the optional regime of sanctions with two different mandatory regimes that apply in case of standard offences and of aggravated offences. The adoption of the Anti-trafficking Directive in 2011 pre-dates the EU legal framework on freezing and confiscation. Therefore, the Commission proposes to update the reference to tracing, freezing, management and confiscation of proceeds by making explicit reference to the EU rules on these matters. Substantial room for improvement remains in the early identification and referral practices of Member States, both at the national and cross-border levels. In particular, not all Member States have a national referral mechanism in place and the structure and functioning of such mechanisms varies considerably across Member States. This proposal seeks to ensure that all Member States establish by laws, regulations or administrative provisions national referral mechanism, with a view to streamlining the functioning of relevant national institutions and to bringing further harmonisation in their structures and practices on referral to victims to appropriate assistance and support systems. This will also constitute the first step towards the establishment of a European Referral Mechanism. The information gathered from recent studies and consultations with relevant stakeholders show that the demand that fosters trafficking has not decreased despite the wealth of relevant education, training and awareness raising activities, and the transposition of Article 18(4) of the Anti-trafficking Directive in a number of Member States. Despite all multi-stakeholder efforts, the demand for sexual services, cheap labour and products persists. This, in turn, fuels trafficking for the purpose of sexual and labour exploitation. This proposal aims to bring further harmonisation across Member States’ with a view to reducing demand. The proposal also recognises that criminal law is only part of the demand reduction response, and it should continue to be accompanied by education, training and awareness raising activities, in line with the Anti-trafficking Directive. Trafficking in human beings is a complex crime. In order to address it appropriately, it is crucial to rely on coherent and reliable data. Similarly to other crime areas, it is estimated that an important part of trafficking cases is not reported. This is one of the factors hampering full understanding of the scope of trafficking in human beings within the EU. In addition, there are important gaps in the data collection on reported cases, and statistics gathered by the Commission are made public with substantial delay after the reporting period. This proposal aims to require Member States to collect and report to the Commission data on trafficking in human beings every year, and to further harmonise data collection, with a view to enhancing its quality and accelerating the publication of data reports.
Revised version (Article 11 Assistance and support for victims of trafficking in human beings):
1. Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that specialised assistance and support are provided to victims in a victim-centred, gender-, disability- and child-sensitive approach before, during, and for an appropriate period of time after the conclusion of, criminal proceedings, in order to enable them to exercise the rights set out in Directive 2012/29/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council ( 2 ) and in this Directive. 2. Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that a person is provided with assistance and support as soon as the competent authorities have a reasonable-grounds indication for believing that the person might have been subjected to any of the offences referred to in Articles 2 and 3. 3. Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that assistance and support for a victim are not made conditional on the victim’s willingness to cooperate in the criminal investigation, prosecution or trial, without prejudice to Directive 2004/81/EC or similar national rules. 4. Member States shall take the necessary measures to establish by laws, regulations or administrative provisions one or several mechanisms aimed at the early detection and identification of, assistance to and support for identified and presumed victims, in cooperation with relevant support organisations, and to appoint a focal point for the cross-border referral of victims. The tasks of the referral mechanisms operating in accordance with this paragraph shall include at least the following: (a) establishing minimum standards for the detection and early identification of victims, and adapting the procedures for such detection and identification to the various forms of exploitation covered by this Directive; (b) referring the victim to the most appropriate support and assistance; (c) establishing cooperation arrangements or protocols with the asylum authorities to ensure that assistance, support and protection is provided to victims of trafficking who are also in need of international protection or who wish to apply for such protection, taking into account the victim’s individual circumstances. 5. The assistance and support measures referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2 shall be provided on a consensual and informed basis, and shall include at least standards of living capable of ensuring victims’ subsistence through measures such as the provision of appropriate and safe accommodation, including shelters and other appropriate interim accommodation, and material assistance, as well as necessary medical treatment including psychological assistance, counselling and information, and translation and interpretation services where appropriate. 5a. The shelters and other appropriate interim accommodations referred to in paragraph 5 shall be provided in sufficient numbers and shall be easily accessible to presumed and identified victims of trafficking. The shelters and other appropriate interim accommodations shall assist them in their recovery, by providing adequate and appropriate living conditions with a view to a return to independent living. They shall also be equipped to accommodate the specific needs of children, including of child victims. 6. The information referred to in paragraph 5 shall cover, where relevant, information on a reflection and recovery period pursuant to Directive 2004/81/EC, and information on the possibility of granting international protection pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2024/1347 ( 3 ) and Regulation (EU) 2024/1348 of the European Parliament and of the Council ( 4 ), or pursuant to other international instruments or other similar national rules. 7. Member States shall attend to victims with special needs, where those needs derive, in particular, from whether they are pregnant, their health, a disability, a mental or psychological disorder they have, or a serious form of psychological, physical or sexual violence they have suffered.
Article 12 Protection of victims of trafficking in human beings in criminal investigation and proceedings
1. The protection measures referred to in this Article shall apply in addition to the rights set out in Framework Decision 2001/220/JHA. 2. Member States shall ensure that victims of trafficking in human beings have access without delay to legal counselling, and, in accordance with the role of victims in the relevant justice system, to legal representation, including for the purpose of claiming compensation. Legal counselling and legal representation shall be free of charge where the victim does not have sufficient financial resources. 3. Member States shall ensure that victims of trafficking in human beings receive appropriate protection on the basis of an individual risk assessment, inter alia, by having access to witness protection programmes or other similar measures, if appropriate and in accordance with the grounds defined by national law or procedures. 4. Without prejudice to the rights of the defence, and according to an individual assessment by the competent authorities of the personal circumstances of the victim, Member States shall ensure that victims of trafficking in human beings receive specific treatment aimed at preventing secondary victimisation by avoiding, as far as possible and in accordance with the grounds defined by national law as well as with rules of judicial discretion, practice or guidance, the following: (a) unnecessary repetition of interviews during investigation, prosecution or trial; (b) visual contact between victims and defendants including during the giving of evidence such as interviews and cross-examination, by appropriate means including the use of appropriate communication technologies; (c) the giving of evidence in open court; and (d) unnecessary questioning concerning the victim’s private life.
Amendment rationale: CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL Reasons for and objectives of the proposal This proposal sets out a series of measures to better prevent and combat trafficking in human beings and to protect its victims under the legal framework in pl ace in the Union , namely Directive 2011/36/EU 1 ( “ the Anti-trafficking Directive ” ). The Anti-trafficking Directive provides an overarching EU framework to prevent and combat trafficking in human beings by establishing minimum rules concerning the definition of criminal offences and sanctions in the area of trafficking in human beings , and by introducing provisions to strengthen the prevention of this crime an d the protection of the victims , while taking into account the gender perspective 2 . The Directive provides EU common rules on : (i) criminalisation, investigation and prosecution of trafficking in human beings, including the definition of offences, penalties and sanctions; (ii) assistance and support to, and protection of, victims of trafficking in human beings; and (iii) prevention of trafficking in human beings 3 . The adoption of the Anti-trafficking Directive in April 2011 was a key development towards enhancing EU efforts to prevent and combat trafficking in human beings, and to protect its victims. It was a crucial step towards harmonisation of the relevant rules across the Member States. However, a number of challenges have arisen or gained importance since 2011. These are addressed through this targeted revision of the Directive. The correct and complete transposition of the Directive and its full implementation remain s a priority for the Commission. Following the adoption of the transposition report 4 t he Commission continued the engagement with the Member State s and committed to use the powers conferred to it by the Treaties to ensure full transposition and implementation of its provisions . By taking a multi-disciplinary and comprehensive approach , the Commission adopted the EU Strategy on combatting trafficking in human beings 2021-2025 5 set ting out detailed actions aimed at improving the implement at i on of the relevant provisions of Directive 2011/36/EU . It provides a robust policy response to combatting trafficking in human beings, from prevention through to protection of victims, to prosecution and conviction of traffickers. The forms of exploitation have evolved since 2011 . S exual and labour exploitation have consistently been the main purposes of trafficking in human beings . Trafficking for sexual exploitation has continuously been the most prevalent form of exploitation in the EU accounting for over a half of all victims and affecting predominantly women and girls 6 . Trafficking for the purpose of labour exploitation has been the second most frequent form of trafficking in the EU , with the number of victims rapidly increasing and nearly doubling in the last five years 7 . However , trafficking for other purposes has gained more prominence over time both as regards forms of exploitation already included in the Anti-trafficking Directive ( begging, exploitation of criminal activities and the removal of organs) as well as forms not explicitly mentioned therein (including forced marriage and illegal adoption) . The overall percentage of other purposes of exploitation represents more than 10% of all victims . This proposal seeks to expand the non-exhaustive list of forms of exploitation explicitly mentioned in the Directive as to include forced marriage and illegal adoption , in order to ensure that national legal systems cover an increasing number of trafficking purposes . The modi operandi of traffickers, who often operate in the framework of organised crime, have also evolved resulting in an increased threat of trafficking in human beings. Advances in technology allow traffickers to recruit, advertise and exploit victims remotely, and to widely share exploitative materials online. The same technological means make it more difficult to detect the crime, identify the perpetrators, and track down the money used to commit offences and the profits generated by the crime. This proposal seeks to address the challenges posed by the increasing digitalisation of trafficking in human beings and to enhance the criminal law response to technology-facilitated offences. Especially in recent years, relevant stakeholders, including EU Agencies, law enforcement and judicial authorities, international and civil society organisations, have highlighted the concern of the growing number of trafficking offences committed or facilitated by means of information and communication technologies. The optional regime of sanctions on legal persons currently in force, as well as the extent to which it is transposed and applied in Member States, does not sufficiently meet the aims of the Anti-trafficking Directive. While still ensuring that sanctions are effective, proportionate and dissuasive, this proposal seeks to enhance the criminal justice response to trafficking offences committed for the benefit of legal persons by replacing the optional regime of sanctions with two different mandatory regimes that apply in case of standard offences and of aggravated offences. The adoption of the Anti-trafficking Directive in 2011 pre-dates the EU legal framework on freezing and confiscation. Therefore, the Commission proposes to update the reference to tracing, freezing, management and confiscation of proceeds by making explicit reference to the EU rules on these matters. Substantial room for improvement remains in the early identification and referral practices of Member States, both at the national and cross-border levels. In particular, not all Member States have a national referral mechanism in place and the structure and functioning of such mechanisms varies considerably across Member States. This proposal seeks to ensure that all Member States establish by laws, regulations or administrative provisions national referral mechanism, with a view to streamlining the functioning of relevant national institutions and to bringing further harmonisation in their structures and practices on referral to victims to appropriate assistance and support systems. This will also constitute the first step towards the establishment of a European Referral Mechanism. The information gathered from recent studies and consultations with relevant stakeholders show that the demand that fosters trafficking has not decreased despite the wealth of relevant education, training and awareness raising activities, and the transposition of Article 18(4) of the Anti-trafficking Directive in a number of Member States. Despite all multi-stakeholder efforts, the demand for sexual services, cheap labour and products persists. This, in turn, fuels trafficking for the purpose of sexual and labour exploitation. This proposal aims to bring further harmonisation across Member States’ with a view to reducing demand. The proposal also recognises that criminal law is only part of the demand reduction response, and it should continue to be accompanied by education, training and awareness raising activities, in line with the Anti-trafficking Directive. Trafficking in human beings is a complex crime. In order to address it appropriately, it is crucial to rely on coherent and reliable data. Similarly to other crime areas, it is estimated that an important part of trafficking cases is not reported. This is one of the factors hampering full understanding of the scope of trafficking in human beings within the EU. In addition, there are important gaps in the data collection on reported cases, and statistics gathered by the Commission are made public with substantial delay after the reporting period. This proposal aims to require Member States to collect and report to the Commission data on trafficking in human beings every year, and to further harmonise data collection, with a view to enhancing its quality and accelerating the publication of data reports.
Revised version (Article 12 Protection of victims of trafficking in human beings in criminal investigation and proceedings):
1. The protection measures referred to in this Article shall apply in addition to the rights set out in Directive 2012/29/EU. 2. Member States shall ensure that victims of trafficking in human beings have access without delay to legal counselling, and, in accordance with the role of victims in the relevant justice system, to legal representation, including for the purpose of claiming compensation. Legal counselling and legal representation shall be free of charge where the victim does not have sufficient financial resources. 3. Member States shall ensure that victims of trafficking in human beings receive appropriate protection on the basis of an individual risk assessment, inter alia, by having access to witness protection programmes or other similar measures, if appropriate and in accordance with the grounds defined by national law or procedures.
Article 13 General provisions on assistance, support and protection measures for child victims of trafficking in human beings
1. Child victims of trafficking in human beings shall be provided with assistance, support and protection. In the application of this Directive the child’s best interests shall be a primary consideration. 2. Member States shall ensure that, where the age of a person subject to trafficking in human beings is uncertain and there are reasons to believe that the person is a child, that person is presumed to be a child in order to receive immediate access to assistance, support and protection in accordance with Articles 14 and 15.
Amendment rationale: CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL Reasons for and objectives of the proposal This proposal sets out a series of measures to better prevent and combat trafficking in human beings and to protect its victims under the legal framework in pl ace in the Union , namely Directive 2011/36/EU 1 ( “ the Anti-trafficking Directive ” ). The Anti-trafficking Directive provides an overarching EU framework to prevent and combat trafficking in human beings by establishing minimum rules concerning the definition of criminal offences and sanctions in the area of trafficking in human beings , and by introducing provisions to strengthen the prevention of this crime an d the protection of the victims , while taking into account the gender perspective 2 . The Directive provides EU common rules on : (i) criminalisation, investigation and prosecution of trafficking in human beings, including the definition of offences, penalties and sanctions; (ii) assistance and support to, and protection of, victims of trafficking in human beings; and (iii) prevention of trafficking in human beings 3 . The adoption of the Anti-trafficking Directive in April 2011 was a key development towards enhancing EU efforts to prevent and combat trafficking in human beings, and to protect its victims. It was a crucial step towards harmonisation of the relevant rules across the Member States. However, a number of challenges have arisen or gained importance since 2011. These are addressed through this targeted revision of the Directive. The correct and complete transposition of the Directive and its full implementation remain s a priority for the Commission. Following the adoption of the transposition report 4 t he Commission continued the engagement with the Member State s and committed to use the powers conferred to it by the Treaties to ensure full transposition and implementation of its provisions . By taking a multi-disciplinary and comprehensive approach , the Commission adopted the EU Strategy on combatting trafficking in human beings 2021-2025 5 set ting out detailed actions aimed at improving the implement at i on of the relevant provisions of Directive 2011/36/EU . It provides a robust policy response to combatting trafficking in human beings, from prevention through to protection of victims, to prosecution and conviction of traffickers. The forms of exploitation have evolved since 2011 . S exual and labour exploitation have consistently been the main purposes of trafficking in human beings . Trafficking for sexual exploitation has continuously been the most prevalent form of exploitation in the EU accounting for over a half of all victims and affecting predominantly women and girls 6 . Trafficking for the purpose of labour exploitation has been the second most frequent form of trafficking in the EU , with the number of victims rapidly increasing and nearly doubling in the last five years 7 . However , trafficking for other purposes has gained more prominence over time both as regards forms of exploitation already included in the Anti-trafficking Directive ( begging, exploitation of criminal activities and the removal of organs) as well as forms not explicitly mentioned therein (including forced marriage and illegal adoption) . The overall percentage of other purposes of exploitation represents more than 10% of all victims . This proposal seeks to expand the non-exhaustive list of forms of exploitation explicitly mentioned in the Directive as to include forced marriage and illegal adoption , in order to ensure that national legal systems cover an increasing number of trafficking purposes . The modi operandi of traffickers, who often operate in the framework of organised crime, have also evolved resulting in an increased threat of trafficking in human beings. Advances in technology allow traffickers to recruit, advertise and exploit victims remotely, and to widely share exploitative materials online. The same technological means make it more difficult to detect the crime, identify the perpetrators, and track down the money used to commit offences and the profits generated by the crime. This proposal seeks to address the challenges posed by the increasing digitalisation of trafficking in human beings and to enhance the criminal law response to technology-facilitated offences. Especially in recent years, relevant stakeholders, including EU Agencies, law enforcement and judicial authorities, international and civil society organisations, have highlighted the concern of the growing number of trafficking offences committed or facilitated by means of information and communication technologies. The optional regime of sanctions on legal persons currently in force, as well as the extent to which it is transposed and applied in Member States, does not sufficiently meet the aims of the Anti-trafficking Directive. While still ensuring that sanctions are effective, proportionate and dissuasive, this proposal seeks to enhance the criminal justice response to trafficking offences committed for the benefit of legal persons by replacing the optional regime of sanctions with two different mandatory regimes that apply in case of standard offences and of aggravated offences. The adoption of the Anti-trafficking Directive in 2011 pre-dates the EU legal framework on freezing and confiscation. Therefore, the Commission proposes to update the reference to tracing, freezing, management and confiscation of proceeds by making explicit reference to the EU rules on these matters. Substantial room for improvement remains in the early identification and referral practices of Member States, both at the national and cross-border levels. In particular, not all Member States have a national referral mechanism in place and the structure and functioning of such mechanisms varies considerably across Member States. This proposal seeks to ensure that all Member States establish by laws, regulations or administrative provisions national referral mechanism, with a view to streamlining the functioning of relevant national institutions and to bringing further harmonisation in their structures and practices on referral to victims to appropriate assistance and support systems. This will also constitute the first step towards the establishment of a European Referral Mechanism. The information gathered from recent studies and consultations with relevant stakeholders show that the demand that fosters trafficking has not decreased despite the wealth of relevant education, training and awareness raising activities, and the transposition of Article 18(4) of the Anti-trafficking Directive in a number of Member States. Despite all multi-stakeholder efforts, the demand for sexual services, cheap labour and products persists. This, in turn, fuels trafficking for the purpose of sexual and labour exploitation. This proposal aims to bring further harmonisation across Member States’ with a view to reducing demand. The proposal also recognises that criminal law is only part of the demand reduction response, and it should continue to be accompanied by education, training and awareness raising activities, in line with the Anti-trafficking Directive. Trafficking in human beings is a complex crime. In order to address it appropriately, it is crucial to rely on coherent and reliable data. Similarly to other crime areas, it is estimated that an important part of trafficking cases is not reported. This is one of the factors hampering full understanding of the scope of trafficking in human beings within the EU. In addition, there are important gaps in the data collection on reported cases, and statistics gathered by the Commission are made public with substantial delay after the reporting period. This proposal aims to require Member States to collect and report to the Commission data on trafficking in human beings every year, and to further harmonise data collection, with a view to enhancing its quality and accelerating the publication of data reports.
Revised version (Article 13 General provisions on assistance, support and protection measures for child victims of trafficking in human beings):
1. Child victims of trafficking in human beings shall be provided with assistance, support and protection. In the application of this Directive the child’s best interests shall be a primary consideration. 2. Member States shall ensure that, where the age of a person subject to trafficking in human beings is uncertain and there are reasons to believe that the person is a child, that person is presumed to be a child in order to receive immediate access to assistance, support and protection in accordance with Articles 14 and 15. 3. Member States shall ensure that the procedures for reporting an offence under this Directive are safe, are carried out in a confidential manner in accordance with national law, are designed and accessible in a child-friendly manner and use language in accordance with the age and maturity of child victims.
Article 14 Assistance and support to child victims
1. Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that the specific actions to assist and support child victims of trafficking in human beings, in the short and long term, in their physical and psycho-social recovery, are undertaken following an individual assessment of the special circumstances of each particular child victim, taking due account of the child’s views, needs and concerns with a view to finding a durable solution for the child. Within a reasonable time, Member States shall provide access to education for child victims and the children of victims who are given assistance and support in accordance with Article 11, in accordance with their national law. 2. Members States shall appoint a guardian or a representative for a child victim of trafficking in human beings from the moment the child is identified by the authorities where, by national law, the holders of parental responsibility are, as a result of a conflict of interest between them and the child victim, precluded from ensuring the child’s best interest and/or from representing the child. 3. Member States shall take measures, where appropriate and possible, to provide assistance and support to the family of a child victim of trafficking in human beings when the family is in the territory of the Member States. In particular, Member States shall, where appropriate and possible, apply Article 4 of Framework Decision 2001/220/JHA to the family. 4. This Article shall apply without prejudice to Article 11.
Amendment rationale: CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL Reasons for and objectives of the proposal This proposal sets out a series of measures to better prevent and combat trafficking in human beings and to protect its victims under the legal framework in pl ace in the Union , namely Directive 2011/36/EU 1 ( “ the Anti-trafficking Directive ” ). The Anti-trafficking Directive provides an overarching EU framework to prevent and combat trafficking in human beings by establishing minimum rules concerning the definition of criminal offences and sanctions in the area of trafficking in human beings , and by introducing provisions to strengthen the prevention of this crime an d the protection of the victims , while taking into account the gender perspective 2 . The Directive provides EU common rules on : (i) criminalisation, investigation and prosecution of trafficking in human beings, including the definition of offences, penalties and sanctions; (ii) assistance and support to, and protection of, victims of trafficking in human beings; and (iii) prevention of trafficking in human beings 3 . The adoption of the Anti-trafficking Directive in April 2011 was a key development towards enhancing EU efforts to prevent and combat trafficking in human beings, and to protect its victims. It was a crucial step towards harmonisation of the relevant rules across the Member States. However, a number of challenges have arisen or gained importance since 2011. These are addressed through this targeted revision of the Directive. The correct and complete transposition of the Directive and its full implementation remain s a priority for the Commission. Following the adoption of the transposition report 4 t he Commission continued the engagement with the Member State s and committed to use the powers conferred to it by the Treaties to ensure full transposition and implementation of its provisions . By taking a multi-disciplinary and comprehensive approach , the Commission adopted the EU Strategy on combatting trafficking in human beings 2021-2025 5 set ting out detailed actions aimed at improving the implement at i on of the relevant provisions of Directive 2011/36/EU . It provides a robust policy response to combatting trafficking in human beings, from prevention through to protection of victims, to prosecution and conviction of traffickers. The forms of exploitation have evolved since 2011 . S exual and labour exploitation have consistently been the main purposes of trafficking in human beings . Trafficking for sexual exploitation has continuously been the most prevalent form of exploitation in the EU accounting for over a half of all victims and affecting predominantly women and girls 6 . Trafficking for the purpose of labour exploitation has been the second most frequent form of trafficking in the EU , with the number of victims rapidly increasing and nearly doubling in the last five years 7 . However , trafficking for other purposes has gained more prominence over time both as regards forms of exploitation already included in the Anti-trafficking Directive ( begging, exploitation of criminal activities and the removal of organs) as well as forms not explicitly mentioned therein (including forced marriage and illegal adoption) . The overall percentage of other purposes of exploitation represents more than 10% of all victims . This proposal seeks to expand the non-exhaustive list of forms of exploitation explicitly mentioned in the Directive as to include forced marriage and illegal adoption , in order to ensure that national legal systems cover an increasing number of trafficking purposes . The modi operandi of traffickers, who often operate in the framework of organised crime, have also evolved resulting in an increased threat of trafficking in human beings. Advances in technology allow traffickers to recruit, advertise and exploit victims remotely, and to widely share exploitative materials online. The same technological means make it more difficult to detect the crime, identify the perpetrators, and track down the money used to commit offences and the profits generated by the crime. This proposal seeks to address the challenges posed by the increasing digitalisation of trafficking in human beings and to enhance the criminal law response to technology-facilitated offences. Especially in recent years, relevant stakeholders, including EU Agencies, law enforcement and judicial authorities, international and civil society organisations, have highlighted the concern of the growing number of trafficking offences committed or facilitated by means of information and communication technologies. The optional regime of sanctions on legal persons currently in force, as well as the extent to which it is transposed and applied in Member States, does not sufficiently meet the aims of the Anti-trafficking Directive. While still ensuring that sanctions are effective, proportionate and dissuasive, this proposal seeks to enhance the criminal justice response to trafficking offences committed for the benefit of legal persons by replacing the optional regime of sanctions with two different mandatory regimes that apply in case of standard offences and of aggravated offences. The adoption of the Anti-trafficking Directive in 2011 pre-dates the EU legal framework on freezing and confiscation. Therefore, the Commission proposes to update the reference to tracing, freezing, management and confiscation of proceeds by making explicit reference to the EU rules on these matters. Substantial room for improvement remains in the early identification and referral practices of Member States, both at the national and cross-border levels. In particular, not all Member States have a national referral mechanism in place and the structure and functioning of such mechanisms varies considerably across Member States. This proposal seeks to ensure that all Member States establish by laws, regulations or administrative provisions national referral mechanism, with a view to streamlining the functioning of relevant national institutions and to bringing further harmonisation in their structures and practices on referral to victims to appropriate assistance and support systems. This will also constitute the first step towards the establishment of a European Referral Mechanism. The information gathered from recent studies and consultations with relevant stakeholders show that the demand that fosters trafficking has not decreased despite the wealth of relevant education, training and awareness raising activities, and the transposition of Article 18(4) of the Anti-trafficking Directive in a number of Member States. Despite all multi-stakeholder efforts, the demand for sexual services, cheap labour and products persists. This, in turn, fuels trafficking for the purpose of sexual and labour exploitation. This proposal aims to bring further harmonisation across Member States’ with a view to reducing demand. The proposal also recognises that criminal law is only part of the demand reduction response, and it should continue to be accompanied by education, training and awareness raising activities, in line with the Anti-trafficking Directive. Trafficking in human beings is a complex crime. In order to address it appropriately, it is crucial to rely on coherent and reliable data. Similarly to other crime areas, it is estimated that an important part of trafficking cases is not reported. This is one of the factors hampering full understanding of the scope of trafficking in human beings within the EU. In addition, there are important gaps in the data collection on reported cases, and statistics gathered by the Commission are made public with substantial delay after the reporting period. This proposal aims to require Member States to collect and report to the Commission data on trafficking in human beings every year, and to further harmonise data collection, with a view to enhancing its quality and accelerating the publication of data reports.
Revised version (Article 14 Assistance and support to child victims):
1. Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that the specific actions to assist and support child victims of trafficking in human beings, in the short and long term, in their physical and psycho-social recovery, are undertaken following an individual assessment of the special circumstances of each particular child victim, taking due account of the child’s views, needs and concerns with a view to finding a durable solution for the child, including programmes to support their transition to emancipation and adulthood in order to avoid re-trafficking. Within a reasonable time, Member States shall provide access to education for child victims and the children of victims who are given assistance and support in accordance with Article 11, in accordance with their national law. 2. Members States shall appoint a guardian or a representative for a child victim of trafficking in human beings from the moment the child is identified by the authorities where, by national law, the holders of parental responsibility are, as a result of a conflict of interest between them and the child victim, precluded from ensuring the child’s best interest and/or from representing the child. Member States shall ensure that, in case of a conflict of interest between the guardian or the representative and the child victim, a different guardian or representative is appointed. 3. Member States shall take measures, where appropriate and possible, to provide assistance and support to the family of a child victim of trafficking in human beings when the family is in the territory of the Member States. In particular, Member States shall, where appropriate and possible, apply Article 4 of Directive 2012/29/EU to the family. 4. This Article shall apply without prejudice to Article 11.
Article 15 Protection of child victims of trafficking in human beings in criminal investigations and proceedings
1. Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that in criminal investigations and proceedings, in accordance with the role of victims in the relevant justice system, competent authorities appoint a representative for a child victim of trafficking in human beings where, by national law, the holders of parental responsibility are precluded from representing the child as a result of a conflict of interest between them and the child victim. 2. Member States shall, in accordance with the role of victims in the relevant justice system, ensure that child victims have access without delay to free legal counselling and to free legal representation, including for the purpose of claiming compensation, unless they have sufficient financial resources. 3. Without prejudice to the rights of the defence, Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that in criminal investigations and proceedings in respect of any of the offences referred to in Articles 2 and 3: (a) interviews with the child victim take place without unjustified delay after the facts have been reported to the competent authorities; (b) interviews with the child victim take place, where necessary, in premises designed or adapted for that purpose; (c) interviews with the child victim are carried out, where necessary, by or through professionals trained for that purpose; (d) the same persons, if possible and where appropriate, conduct all the interviews with the child victim; (e) the number of interviews is as limited as possible and interviews are carried out only where strictly necessary for the purposes of criminal investigations and proceedings; (f) the child victim may be accompanied by a representative or, where appropriate, an adult of the child’s choice, unless a reasoned decision has been made to the contrary in respect of that person. 4. Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that in criminal investigations of any of the offences referred to in Articles 2 and 3 all interviews with a child victim or, where appropriate, with a child witness, may be video recorded and that such video recorded interviews may be used as evidence in criminal court proceedings, in accordance with the rules under their national law. 5. Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that in criminal court proceedings relating to any of the offences referred to in Articles 2 and 3, it may be ordered that: (a) the hearing take place without the presence of the public; and (b) the child victim be heard in the courtroom without being present, in particular, through the use of appropriate communication technologies. 6. This Article shall apply without prejudice to Article 12.
Amendment rationale: CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL Reasons for and objectives of the proposal This proposal sets out a series of measures to better prevent and combat trafficking in human beings and to protect its victims under the legal framework in pl ace in the Union , namely Directive 2011/36/EU 1 ( “ the Anti-trafficking Directive ” ). The Anti-trafficking Directive provides an overarching EU framework to prevent and combat trafficking in human beings by establishing minimum rules concerning the definition of criminal offences and sanctions in the area of trafficking in human beings , and by introducing provisions to strengthen the prevention of this crime an d the protection of the victims , while taking into account the gender perspective 2 . The Directive provides EU common rules on : (i) criminalisation, investigation and prosecution of trafficking in human beings, including the definition of offences, penalties and sanctions; (ii) assistance and support to, and protection of, victims of trafficking in human beings; and (iii) prevention of trafficking in human beings 3 . The adoption of the Anti-trafficking Directive in April 2011 was a key development towards enhancing EU efforts to prevent and combat trafficking in human beings, and to protect its victims. It was a crucial step towards harmonisation of the relevant rules across the Member States. However, a number of challenges have arisen or gained importance since 2011. These are addressed through this targeted revision of the Directive. The correct and complete transposition of the Directive and its full implementation remain s a priority for the Commission. Following the adoption of the transposition report 4 t he Commission continued the engagement with the Member State s and committed to use the powers conferred to it by the Treaties to ensure full transposition and implementation of its provisions . By taking a multi-disciplinary and comprehensive approach , the Commission adopted the EU Strategy on combatting trafficking in human beings 2021-2025 5 set ting out detailed actions aimed at improving the implement at i on of the relevant provisions of Directive 2011/36/EU . It provides a robust policy response to combatting trafficking in human beings, from prevention through to protection of victims, to prosecution and conviction of traffickers. The forms of exploitation have evolved since 2011 . S exual and labour exploitation have consistently been the main purposes of trafficking in human beings . Trafficking for sexual exploitation has continuously been the most prevalent form of exploitation in the EU accounting for over a half of all victims and affecting predominantly women and girls 6 . Trafficking for the purpose of labour exploitation has been the second most frequent form of trafficking in the EU , with the number of victims rapidly increasing and nearly doubling in the last five years 7 . However , trafficking for other purposes has gained more prominence over time both as regards forms of exploitation already included in the Anti-trafficking Directive ( begging, exploitation of criminal activities and the removal of organs) as well as forms not explicitly mentioned therein (including forced marriage and illegal adoption) . The overall percentage of other purposes of exploitation represents more than 10% of all victims . This proposal seeks to expand the non-exhaustive list of forms of exploitation explicitly mentioned in the Directive as to include forced marriage and illegal adoption , in order to ensure that national legal systems cover an increasing number of trafficking purposes . The modi operandi of traffickers, who often operate in the framework of organised crime, have also evolved resulting in an increased threat of trafficking in human beings. Advances in technology allow traffickers to recruit, advertise and exploit victims remotely, and to widely share exploitative materials online. The same technological means make it more difficult to detect the crime, identify the perpetrators, and track down the money used to commit offences and the profits generated by the crime. This proposal seeks to address the challenges posed by the increasing digitalisation of trafficking in human beings and to enhance the criminal law response to technology-facilitated offences. Especially in recent years, relevant stakeholders, including EU Agencies, law enforcement and judicial authorities, international and civil society organisations, have highlighted the concern of the growing number of trafficking offences committed or facilitated by means of information and communication technologies. The optional regime of sanctions on legal persons currently in force, as well as the extent to which it is transposed and applied in Member States, does not sufficiently meet the aims of the Anti-trafficking Directive. While still ensuring that sanctions are effective, proportionate and dissuasive, this proposal seeks to enhance the criminal justice response to trafficking offences committed for the benefit of legal persons by replacing the optional regime of sanctions with two different mandatory regimes that apply in case of standard offences and of aggravated offences. The adoption of the Anti-trafficking Directive in 2011 pre-dates the EU legal framework on freezing and confiscation. Therefore, the Commission proposes to update the reference to tracing, freezing, management and confiscation of proceeds by making explicit reference to the EU rules on these matters. Substantial room for improvement remains in the early identification and referral practices of Member States, both at the national and cross-border levels. In particular, not all Member States have a national referral mechanism in place and the structure and functioning of such mechanisms varies considerably across Member States. This proposal seeks to ensure that all Member States establish by laws, regulations or administrative provisions national referral mechanism, with a view to streamlining the functioning of relevant national institutions and to bringing further harmonisation in their structures and practices on referral to victims to appropriate assistance and support systems. This will also constitute the first step towards the establishment of a European Referral Mechanism. The information gathered from recent studies and consultations with relevant stakeholders show that the demand that fosters trafficking has not decreased despite the wealth of relevant education, training and awareness raising activities, and the transposition of Article 18(4) of the Anti-trafficking Directive in a number of Member States. Despite all multi-stakeholder efforts, the demand for sexual services, cheap labour and products persists. This, in turn, fuels trafficking for the purpose of sexual and labour exploitation. This proposal aims to bring further harmonisation across Member States’ with a view to reducing demand. The proposal also recognises that criminal law is only part of the demand reduction response, and it should continue to be accompanied by education, training and awareness raising activities, in line with the Anti-trafficking Directive. Trafficking in human beings is a complex crime. In order to address it appropriately, it is crucial to rely on coherent and reliable data. Similarly to other crime areas, it is estimated that an important part of trafficking cases is not reported. This is one of the factors hampering full understanding of the scope of trafficking in human beings within the EU. In addition, there are important gaps in the data collection on reported cases, and statistics gathered by the Commission are made public with substantial delay after the reporting period. This proposal aims to require Member States to collect and report to the Commission data on trafficking in human beings every year, and to further harmonise data collection, with a view to enhancing its quality and accelerating the publication of data reports.
Revised version (Article 15 Protection of child victims of trafficking in human beings in criminal investigations and proceedings):
1. Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that in criminal investigations and proceedings, in accordance with the role of victims in the relevant justice system, competent authorities appoint a representative for a child victim of trafficking in human beings where, by national law, the holders of parental responsibility are precluded from representing the child as a result of a conflict of interest between them and the child victim. 2. Member States shall, in accordance with the role of victims in the relevant justice system, ensure that child victims have access without delay to free legal counselling and to free legal representation, including for the purpose of claiming compensation, unless they have sufficient financial resources. 4. Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that in criminal investigations of any of the offences referred to in Articles 2 and 3 all interviews with a child victim or, where appropriate, with a child witness, may be video recorded and that such video recorded interviews may be used as evidence in criminal court proceedings, in accordance with the rules under their national law. 5. Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that in criminal court proceedings relating to any of the offences referred to in Articles 2 and 3, it may be ordered that: (a) the hearing take place without the presence of the public; and (b) the child victim be heard in the courtroom without being present, in particular, through the use of appropriate communication technologies. 6. This Article shall apply without prejudice to Article 12.
Article 16 Assistance, support and protection for unaccompanied child victims of trafficking in human beings
1. Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that the specific actions to assist and support child victims of trafficking in human beings, as referred to in Article 14(1), take due account of the personal and special circumstances of the unaccompanied child victim. 2. Member States shall take the necessary measures with a view to finding a durable solution based on an individual assessment of the best interests of the child. 3. Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that, where appropriate, a guardian is appointed to unaccompanied child victims of trafficking in human beings. 4. Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that, in criminal investigations and proceedings, in accordance with the role of victims in the relevant justice system, competent authorities appoint a representative where the child is unaccompanied or separated from its family. 5. This Article shall apply without prejudice to Articles 14 and 15.
Article 17 Compensation to victims
Member States shall ensure that victims of trafficking in human beings have access to existing schemes of compensation to victims of violent crimes of intent.
Amendment rationale: CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL Reasons for and objectives of the proposal This proposal sets out a series of measures to better prevent and combat trafficking in human beings and to protect its victims under the legal framework in pl ace in the Union , namely Directive 2011/36/EU 1 ( “ the Anti-trafficking Directive ” ). The Anti-trafficking Directive provides an overarching EU framework to prevent and combat trafficking in human beings by establishing minimum rules concerning the definition of criminal offences and sanctions in the area of trafficking in human beings , and by introducing provisions to strengthen the prevention of this crime an d the protection of the victims , while taking into account the gender perspective 2 . The Directive provides EU common rules on : (i) criminalisation, investigation and prosecution of trafficking in human beings, including the definition of offences, penalties and sanctions; (ii) assistance and support to, and protection of, victims of trafficking in human beings; and (iii) prevention of trafficking in human beings 3 . The adoption of the Anti-trafficking Directive in April 2011 was a key development towards enhancing EU efforts to prevent and combat trafficking in human beings, and to protect its victims. It was a crucial step towards harmonisation of the relevant rules across the Member States. However, a number of challenges have arisen or gained importance since 2011. These are addressed through this targeted revision of the Directive. The correct and complete transposition of the Directive and its full implementation remain s a priority for the Commission. Following the adoption of the transposition report 4 t he Commission continued the engagement with the Member State s and committed to use the powers conferred to it by the Treaties to ensure full transposition and implementation of its provisions . By taking a multi-disciplinary and comprehensive approach , the Commission adopted the EU Strategy on combatting trafficking in human beings 2021-2025 5 set ting out detailed actions aimed at improving the implement at i on of the relevant provisions of Directive 2011/36/EU . It provides a robust policy response to combatting trafficking in human beings, from prevention through to protection of victims, to prosecution and conviction of traffickers. The forms of exploitation have evolved since 2011 . S exual and labour exploitation have consistently been the main purposes of trafficking in human beings . Trafficking for sexual exploitation has continuously been the most prevalent form of exploitation in the EU accounting for over a half of all victims and affecting predominantly women and girls 6 . Trafficking for the purpose of labour exploitation has been the second most frequent form of trafficking in the EU , with the number of victims rapidly increasing and nearly doubling in the last five years 7 . However , trafficking for other purposes has gained more prominence over time both as regards forms of exploitation already included in the Anti-trafficking Directive ( begging, exploitation of criminal activities and the removal of organs) as well as forms not explicitly mentioned therein (including forced marriage and illegal adoption) . The overall percentage of other purposes of exploitation represents more than 10% of all victims . This proposal seeks to expand the non-exhaustive list of forms of exploitation explicitly mentioned in the Directive as to include forced marriage and illegal adoption , in order to ensure that national legal systems cover an increasing number of trafficking purposes . The modi operandi of traffickers, who often operate in the framework of organised crime, have also evolved resulting in an increased threat of trafficking in human beings. Advances in technology allow traffickers to recruit, advertise and exploit victims remotely, and to widely share exploitative materials online. The same technological means make it more difficult to detect the crime, identify the perpetrators, and track down the money used to commit offences and the profits generated by the crime. This proposal seeks to address the challenges posed by the increasing digitalisation of trafficking in human beings and to enhance the criminal law response to technology-facilitated offences. Especially in recent years, relevant stakeholders, including EU Agencies, law enforcement and judicial authorities, international and civil society organisations, have highlighted the concern of the growing number of trafficking offences committed or facilitated by means of information and communication technologies. The optional regime of sanctions on legal persons currently in force, as well as the extent to which it is transposed and applied in Member States, does not sufficiently meet the aims of the Anti-trafficking Directive. While still ensuring that sanctions are effective, proportionate and dissuasive, this proposal seeks to enhance the criminal justice response to trafficking offences committed for the benefit of legal persons by replacing the optional regime of sanctions with two different mandatory regimes that apply in case of standard offences and of aggravated offences. The adoption of the Anti-trafficking Directive in 2011 pre-dates the EU legal framework on freezing and confiscation. Therefore, the Commission proposes to update the reference to tracing, freezing, management and confiscation of proceeds by making explicit reference to the EU rules on these matters. Substantial room for improvement remains in the early identification and referral practices of Member States, both at the national and cross-border levels. In particular, not all Member States have a national referral mechanism in place and the structure and functioning of such mechanisms varies considerably across Member States. This proposal seeks to ensure that all Member States establish by laws, regulations or administrative provisions national referral mechanism, with a view to streamlining the functioning of relevant national institutions and to bringing further harmonisation in their structures and practices on referral to victims to appropriate assistance and support systems. This will also constitute the first step towards the establishment of a European Referral Mechanism. The information gathered from recent studies and consultations with relevant stakeholders show that the demand that fosters trafficking has not decreased despite the wealth of relevant education, training and awareness raising activities, and the transposition of Article 18(4) of the Anti-trafficking Directive in a number of Member States. Despite all multi-stakeholder efforts, the demand for sexual services, cheap labour and products persists. This, in turn, fuels trafficking for the purpose of sexual and labour exploitation. This proposal aims to bring further harmonisation across Member States’ with a view to reducing demand. The proposal also recognises that criminal law is only part of the demand reduction response, and it should continue to be accompanied by education, training and awareness raising activities, in line with the Anti-trafficking Directive. Trafficking in human beings is a complex crime. In order to address it appropriately, it is crucial to rely on coherent and reliable data. Similarly to other crime areas, it is estimated that an important part of trafficking cases is not reported. This is one of the factors hampering full understanding of the scope of trafficking in human beings within the EU. In addition, there are important gaps in the data collection on reported cases, and statistics gathered by the Commission are made public with substantial delay after the reporting period. This proposal aims to require Member States to collect and report to the Commission data on trafficking in human beings every year, and to further harmonise data collection, with a view to enhancing its quality and accelerating the publication of data reports.
Revised version (Article 17 ):
Member States shall ensure that victims of trafficking in human beings have access to existing schemes of compensation to victims of violent crimes of intent. Member States may establish a national victims fund or a similar instrument, in accordance with their national legislation, in order to pay compensation to victims.
Article 18 Prevention
1. Member States shall take appropriate measures, such as education and training, to discourage and reduce the demand that fosters all forms of exploitation related to trafficking in human beings. 2. Member States shall take appropriate action, including through the Internet, such as information and awareness-raising campaigns, research and education programmes, where appropriate in cooperation with relevant civil society organisations and other stakeholders, aimed at raising awareness and reducing the risk of people, especially children, becoming victims of trafficking in human beings. 3. Member States shall promote regular training for officials likely to come into contact with victims or potential victims of trafficking in human beings, including front-line police officers, aimed at enabling them to identify and deal with victims and potential victims of trafficking in human beings. 4. In order to make the preventing and combating of trafficking in human beings more effective by discouraging demand, Member States shall consider taking measures to establish as a criminal offence the use of services which are the objects of exploitation as referred to in Article 2, with the knowledge that the person is a victim of an offence referred to in Article 2.
Amendment rationale: CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL Reasons for and objectives of the proposal This proposal sets out a series of measures to better prevent and combat trafficking in human beings and to protect its victims under the legal framework in pl ace in the Union , namely Directive 2011/36/EU 1 ( “ the Anti-trafficking Directive ” ). The Anti-trafficking Directive provides an overarching EU framework to prevent and combat trafficking in human beings by establishing minimum rules concerning the definition of criminal offences and sanctions in the area of trafficking in human beings , and by introducing provisions to strengthen the prevention of this crime an d the protection of the victims , while taking into account the gender perspective 2 . The Directive provides EU common rules on : (i) criminalisation, investigation and prosecution of trafficking in human beings, including the definition of offences, penalties and sanctions; (ii) assistance and support to, and protection of, victims of trafficking in human beings; and (iii) prevention of trafficking in human beings 3 . The adoption of the Anti-trafficking Directive in April 2011 was a key development towards enhancing EU efforts to prevent and combat trafficking in human beings, and to protect its victims. It was a crucial step towards harmonisation of the relevant rules across the Member States. However, a number of challenges have arisen or gained importance since 2011. These are addressed through this targeted revision of the Directive. The correct and complete transposition of the Directive and its full implementation remain s a priority for the Commission. Following the adoption of the transposition report 4 t he Commission continued the engagement with the Member State s and committed to use the powers conferred to it by the Treaties to ensure full transposition and implementation of its provisions . By taking a multi-disciplinary and comprehensive approach , the Commission adopted the EU Strategy on combatting trafficking in human beings 2021-2025 5 set ting out detailed actions aimed at improving the implement at i on of the relevant provisions of Directive 2011/36/EU . It provides a robust policy response to combatting trafficking in human beings, from prevention through to protection of victims, to prosecution and conviction of traffickers. The forms of exploitation have evolved since 2011 . S exual and labour exploitation have consistently been the main purposes of trafficking in human beings . Trafficking for sexual exploitation has continuously been the most prevalent form of exploitation in the EU accounting for over a half of all victims and affecting predominantly women and girls 6 . Trafficking for the purpose of labour exploitation has been the second most frequent form of trafficking in the EU , with the number of victims rapidly increasing and nearly doubling in the last five years 7 . However , trafficking for other purposes has gained more prominence over time both as regards forms of exploitation already included in the Anti-trafficking Directive ( begging, exploitation of criminal activities and the removal of organs) as well as forms not explicitly mentioned therein (including forced marriage and illegal adoption) . The overall percentage of other purposes of exploitation represents more than 10% of all victims . This proposal seeks to expand the non-exhaustive list of forms of exploitation explicitly mentioned in the Directive as to include forced marriage and illegal adoption , in order to ensure that national legal systems cover an increasing number of trafficking purposes . The modi operandi of traffickers, who often operate in the framework of organised crime, have also evolved resulting in an increased threat of trafficking in human beings. Advances in technology allow traffickers to recruit, advertise and exploit victims remotely, and to widely share exploitative materials online. The same technological means make it more difficult to detect the crime, identify the perpetrators, and track down the money used to commit offences and the profits generated by the crime. This proposal seeks to address the challenges posed by the increasing digitalisation of trafficking in human beings and to enhance the criminal law response to technology-facilitated offences. Especially in recent years, relevant stakeholders, including EU Agencies, law enforcement and judicial authorities, international and civil society organisations, have highlighted the concern of the growing number of trafficking offences committed or facilitated by means of information and communication technologies. The optional regime of sanctions on legal persons currently in force, as well as the extent to which it is transposed and applied in Member States, does not sufficiently meet the aims of the Anti-trafficking Directive. While still ensuring that sanctions are effective, proportionate and dissuasive, this proposal seeks to enhance the criminal justice response to trafficking offences committed for the benefit of legal persons by replacing the optional regime of sanctions with two different mandatory regimes that apply in case of standard offences and of aggravated offences. The adoption of the Anti-trafficking Directive in 2011 pre-dates the EU legal framework on freezing and confiscation. Therefore, the Commission proposes to update the reference to tracing, freezing, management and confiscation of proceeds by making explicit reference to the EU rules on these matters. Substantial room for improvement remains in the early identification and referral practices of Member States, both at the national and cross-border levels. In particular, not all Member States have a national referral mechanism in place and the structure and functioning of such mechanisms varies considerably across Member States. This proposal seeks to ensure that all Member States establish by laws, regulations or administrative provisions national referral mechanism, with a view to streamlining the functioning of relevant national institutions and to bringing further harmonisation in their structures and practices on referral to victims to appropriate assistance and support systems. This will also constitute the first step towards the establishment of a European Referral Mechanism. The information gathered from recent studies and consultations with relevant stakeholders show that the demand that fosters trafficking has not decreased despite the wealth of relevant education, training and awareness raising activities, and the transposition of Article 18(4) of the Anti-trafficking Directive in a number of Member States. Despite all multi-stakeholder efforts, the demand for sexual services, cheap labour and products persists. This, in turn, fuels trafficking for the purpose of sexual and labour exploitation. This proposal aims to bring further harmonisation across Member States’ with a view to reducing demand. The proposal also recognises that criminal law is only part of the demand reduction response, and it should continue to be accompanied by education, training and awareness raising activities, in line with the Anti-trafficking Directive. Trafficking in human beings is a complex crime. In order to address it appropriately, it is crucial to rely on coherent and reliable data. Similarly to other crime areas, it is estimated that an important part of trafficking cases is not reported. This is one of the factors hampering full understanding of the scope of trafficking in human beings within the EU. In addition, there are important gaps in the data collection on reported cases, and statistics gathered by the Commission are made public with substantial delay after the reporting period. This proposal aims to require Member States to collect and report to the Commission data on trafficking in human beings every year, and to further harmonise data collection, with a view to enhancing its quality and accelerating the publication of data reports.
Revised version (Article 18 ):
1. Member States shall take appropriate measures, taking into account the specificities of the various forms of exploitation, such as education, training and campaigns, where relevant with specific attention to the online dimension, to discourage and reduce the demand that fosters all forms of exploitation related to trafficking in human beings. 2. Member States shall take appropriate action, in a gender-sensitive and child-friendly way, including through the internet, such as information and awareness-raising campaigns, research and education programmes, including the promotion of digital literacy and skills, and where appropriate in cooperation with relevant civil society organisations and other stakeholders such as the private sector, aimed at raising awareness and reducing the risk of people, especially children and persons with disabilities, becoming victims of trafficking in human beings.
Article 19 National rapporteurs or equivalent mechanisms
Member States shall take the necessary measures to establish national rapporteurs or equivalent mechanisms. The tasks of such mechanisms shall include the carrying out of assessments of trends in trafficking in human beings, the measuring of results of anti-trafficking actions, including the gathering of statistics in close cooperation with relevant civil society organisations active in this field, and reporting.
Amendment rationale: CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL Reasons for and objectives of the proposal This proposal sets out a series of measures to better prevent and combat trafficking in human beings and to protect its victims under the legal framework in pl ace in the Union , namely Directive 2011/36/EU 1 ( “ the Anti-trafficking Directive ” ). The Anti-trafficking Directive provides an overarching EU framework to prevent and combat trafficking in human beings by establishing minimum rules concerning the definition of criminal offences and sanctions in the area of trafficking in human beings , and by introducing provisions to strengthen the prevention of this crime an d the protection of the victims , while taking into account the gender perspective 2 . The Directive provides EU common rules on : (i) criminalisation, investigation and prosecution of trafficking in human beings, including the definition of offences, penalties and sanctions; (ii) assistance and support to, and protection of, victims of trafficking in human beings; and (iii) prevention of trafficking in human beings 3 . The adoption of the Anti-trafficking Directive in April 2011 was a key development towards enhancing EU efforts to prevent and combat trafficking in human beings, and to protect its victims. It was a crucial step towards harmonisation of the relevant rules across the Member States. However, a number of challenges have arisen or gained importance since 2011. These are addressed through this targeted revision of the Directive. The correct and complete transposition of the Directive and its full implementation remain s a priority for the Commission. Following the adoption of the transposition report 4 t he Commission continued the engagement with the Member State s and committed to use the powers conferred to it by the Treaties to ensure full transposition and implementation of its provisions . By taking a multi-disciplinary and comprehensive approach , the Commission adopted the EU Strategy on combatting trafficking in human beings 2021-2025 5 set ting out detailed actions aimed at improving the implement at i on of the relevant provisions of Directive 2011/36/EU . It provides a robust policy response to combatting trafficking in human beings, from prevention through to protection of victims, to prosecution and conviction of traffickers. The forms of exploitation have evolved since 2011 . S exual and labour exploitation have consistently been the main purposes of trafficking in human beings . Trafficking for sexual exploitation has continuously been the most prevalent form of exploitation in the EU accounting for over a half of all victims and affecting predominantly women and girls 6 . Trafficking for the purpose of labour exploitation has been the second most frequent form of trafficking in the EU , with the number of victims rapidly increasing and nearly doubling in the last five years 7 . However , trafficking for other purposes has gained more prominence over time both as regards forms of exploitation already included in the Anti-trafficking Directive ( begging, exploitation of criminal activities and the removal of organs) as well as forms not explicitly mentioned therein (including forced marriage and illegal adoption) . The overall percentage of other purposes of exploitation represents more than 10% of all victims . This proposal seeks to expand the non-exhaustive list of forms of exploitation explicitly mentioned in the Directive as to include forced marriage and illegal adoption , in order to ensure that national legal systems cover an increasing number of trafficking purposes . The modi operandi of traffickers, who often operate in the framework of organised crime, have also evolved resulting in an increased threat of trafficking in human beings. Advances in technology allow traffickers to recruit, advertise and exploit victims remotely, and to widely share exploitative materials online. The same technological means make it more difficult to detect the crime, identify the perpetrators, and track down the money used to commit offences and the profits generated by the crime. This proposal seeks to address the challenges posed by the increasing digitalisation of trafficking in human beings and to enhance the criminal law response to technology-facilitated offences. Especially in recent years, relevant stakeholders, including EU Agencies, law enforcement and judicial authorities, international and civil society organisations, have highlighted the concern of the growing number of trafficking offences committed or facilitated by means of information and communication technologies. The optional regime of sanctions on legal persons currently in force, as well as the extent to which it is transposed and applied in Member States, does not sufficiently meet the aims of the Anti-trafficking Directive. While still ensuring that sanctions are effective, proportionate and dissuasive, this proposal seeks to enhance the criminal justice response to trafficking offences committed for the benefit of legal persons by replacing the optional regime of sanctions with two different mandatory regimes that apply in case of standard offences and of aggravated offences. The adoption of the Anti-trafficking Directive in 2011 pre-dates the EU legal framework on freezing and confiscation. Therefore, the Commission proposes to update the reference to tracing, freezing, management and confiscation of proceeds by making explicit reference to the EU rules on these matters. Substantial room for improvement remains in the early identification and referral practices of Member States, both at the national and cross-border levels. In particular, not all Member States have a national referral mechanism in place and the structure and functioning of such mechanisms varies considerably across Member States. This proposal seeks to ensure that all Member States establish by laws, regulations or administrative provisions national referral mechanism, with a view to streamlining the functioning of relevant national institutions and to bringing further harmonisation in their structures and practices on referral to victims to appropriate assistance and support systems. This will also constitute the first step towards the establishment of a European Referral Mechanism. The information gathered from recent studies and consultations with relevant stakeholders show that the demand that fosters trafficking has not decreased despite the wealth of relevant education, training and awareness raising activities, and the transposition of Article 18(4) of the Anti-trafficking Directive in a number of Member States. Despite all multi-stakeholder efforts, the demand for sexual services, cheap labour and products persists. This, in turn, fuels trafficking for the purpose of sexual and labour exploitation. This proposal aims to bring further harmonisation across Member States’ with a view to reducing demand. The proposal also recognises that criminal law is only part of the demand reduction response, and it should continue to be accompanied by education, training and awareness raising activities, in line with the Anti-trafficking Directive. Trafficking in human beings is a complex crime. In order to address it appropriately, it is crucial to rely on coherent and reliable data. Similarly to other crime areas, it is estimated that an important part of trafficking cases is not reported. This is one of the factors hampering full understanding of the scope of trafficking in human beings within the EU. In addition, there are important gaps in the data collection on reported cases, and statistics gathered by the Commission are made public with substantial delay after the reporting period. This proposal aims to require Member States to collect and report to the Commission data on trafficking in human beings every year, and to further harmonise data collection, with a view to enhancing its quality and accelerating the publication of data reports.
Revised version (Article 19 ):
1. Member States shall take the necessary measures to establish national anti-trafficking coordinators or equivalent mechanisms and to provide them with the adequate resources necessary to effectively carry out their functions. The national anti-trafficking coordinator or the equivalent mechanism shall work with relevant national, regional and local bodies and agencies, particularly law-enforcement authorities, with national referral mechanisms, and with relevant civil society organisations active in this field. 2. The tasks of the national anti-trafficking coordinators or equivalent mechanisms shall include the carrying out of assessments of trends in trafficking in human beings, the measuring of results of anti-trafficking actions, including the gathering of statistics in close cooperation with relevant civil society organisations active in this field, and reporting. The tasks of the national anti-trafficking coordinators or equivalent mechanisms may also include the following: (a) setting up contingency response plans in order to prevent the threat of trafficking in human beings in the event of major emergencies; (b) promoting, coordinating and, where appropriate, financing programmes against trafficking. 3. Member States may also establish independent bodies whose role may include monitoring the implementation and impact of anti-trafficking actions, submitting reports on matters requiring special attention of the competent national authorities, and carrying out assessments of root causes and trends in trafficking in human beings. Where such an independent body is established, Member States may assign it one or more of the tasks referred to in paragraph 2.
Article 20 Coordination of the Union strategy against trafficking in human beings
In order to contribute to a coordinated and consolidated Union strategy against trafficking in human beings, Member States shall facilitate the tasks of an anti-trafficking coordinator (ATC). In particular, Member States shall transmit to the ATC the information referred to in Article 19, on the basis of which the ATC shall contribute to reporting carried out by the Commission every two years on the progress made in the fight against trafficking in human beings.
Amendment rationale: CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL Reasons for and objectives of the proposal This proposal sets out a series of measures to better prevent and combat trafficking in human beings and to protect its victims under the legal framework in pl ace in the Union , namely Directive 2011/36/EU 1 ( “ the Anti-trafficking Directive ” ). The Anti-trafficking Directive provides an overarching EU framework to prevent and combat trafficking in human beings by establishing minimum rules concerning the definition of criminal offences and sanctions in the area of trafficking in human beings , and by introducing provisions to strengthen the prevention of this crime an d the protection of the victims , while taking into account the gender perspective 2 . The Directive provides EU common rules on : (i) criminalisation, investigation and prosecution of trafficking in human beings, including the definition of offences, penalties and sanctions; (ii) assistance and support to, and protection of, victims of trafficking in human beings; and (iii) prevention of trafficking in human beings 3 . The adoption of the Anti-trafficking Directive in April 2011 was a key development towards enhancing EU efforts to prevent and combat trafficking in human beings, and to protect its victims. It was a crucial step towards harmonisation of the relevant rules across the Member States. However, a number of challenges have arisen or gained importance since 2011. These are addressed through this targeted revision of the Directive. The correct and complete transposition of the Directive and its full implementation remain s a priority for the Commission. Following the adoption of the transposition report 4 t he Commission continued the engagement with the Member State s and committed to use the powers conferred to it by the Treaties to ensure full transposition and implementation of its provisions . By taking a multi-disciplinary and comprehensive approach , the Commission adopted the EU Strategy on combatting trafficking in human beings 2021-2025 5 set ting out detailed actions aimed at improving the implement at i on of the relevant provisions of Directive 2011/36/EU . It provides a robust policy response to combatting trafficking in human beings, from prevention through to protection of victims, to prosecution and conviction of traffickers. The forms of exploitation have evolved since 2011 . S exual and labour exploitation have consistently been the main purposes of trafficking in human beings . Trafficking for sexual exploitation has continuously been the most prevalent form of exploitation in the EU accounting for over a half of all victims and affecting predominantly women and girls 6 . Trafficking for the purpose of labour exploitation has been the second most frequent form of trafficking in the EU , with the number of victims rapidly increasing and nearly doubling in the last five years 7 . However , trafficking for other purposes has gained more prominence over time both as regards forms of exploitation already included in the Anti-trafficking Directive ( begging, exploitation of criminal activities and the removal of organs) as well as forms not explicitly mentioned therein (including forced marriage and illegal adoption) . The overall percentage of other purposes of exploitation represents more than 10% of all victims . This proposal seeks to expand the non-exhaustive list of forms of exploitation explicitly mentioned in the Directive as to include forced marriage and illegal adoption , in order to ensure that national legal systems cover an increasing number of trafficking purposes . The modi operandi of traffickers, who often operate in the framework of organised crime, have also evolved resulting in an increased threat of trafficking in human beings. Advances in technology allow traffickers to recruit, advertise and exploit victims remotely, and to widely share exploitative materials online. The same technological means make it more difficult to detect the crime, identify the perpetrators, and track down the money used to commit offences and the profits generated by the crime. This proposal seeks to address the challenges posed by the increasing digitalisation of trafficking in human beings and to enhance the criminal law response to technology-facilitated offences. Especially in recent years, relevant stakeholders, including EU Agencies, law enforcement and judicial authorities, international and civil society organisations, have highlighted the concern of the growing number of trafficking offences committed or facilitated by means of information and communication technologies. The optional regime of sanctions on legal persons currently in force, as well as the extent to which it is transposed and applied in Member States, does not sufficiently meet the aims of the Anti-trafficking Directive. While still ensuring that sanctions are effective, proportionate and dissuasive, this proposal seeks to enhance the criminal justice response to trafficking offences committed for the benefit of legal persons by replacing the optional regime of sanctions with two different mandatory regimes that apply in case of standard offences and of aggravated offences. The adoption of the Anti-trafficking Directive in 2011 pre-dates the EU legal framework on freezing and confiscation. Therefore, the Commission proposes to update the reference to tracing, freezing, management and confiscation of proceeds by making explicit reference to the EU rules on these matters. Substantial room for improvement remains in the early identification and referral practices of Member States, both at the national and cross-border levels. In particular, not all Member States have a national referral mechanism in place and the structure and functioning of such mechanisms varies considerably across Member States. This proposal seeks to ensure that all Member States establish by laws, regulations or administrative provisions national referral mechanism, with a view to streamlining the functioning of relevant national institutions and to bringing further harmonisation in their structures and practices on referral to victims to appropriate assistance and support systems. This will also constitute the first step towards the establishment of a European Referral Mechanism. The information gathered from recent studies and consultations with relevant stakeholders show that the demand that fosters trafficking has not decreased despite the wealth of relevant education, training and awareness raising activities, and the transposition of Article 18(4) of the Anti-trafficking Directive in a number of Member States. Despite all multi-stakeholder efforts, the demand for sexual services, cheap labour and products persists. This, in turn, fuels trafficking for the purpose of sexual and labour exploitation. This proposal aims to bring further harmonisation across Member States’ with a view to reducing demand. The proposal also recognises that criminal law is only part of the demand reduction response, and it should continue to be accompanied by education, training and awareness raising activities, in line with the Anti-trafficking Directive. Trafficking in human beings is a complex crime. In order to address it appropriately, it is crucial to rely on coherent and reliable data. Similarly to other crime areas, it is estimated that an important part of trafficking cases is not reported. This is one of the factors hampering full understanding of the scope of trafficking in human beings within the EU. In addition, there are important gaps in the data collection on reported cases, and statistics gathered by the Commission are made public with substantial delay after the reporting period. This proposal aims to require Member States to collect and report to the Commission data on trafficking in human beings every year, and to further harmonise data collection, with a view to enhancing its quality and accelerating the publication of data reports.
Revised version (Article 20 ):
1. In order to contribute to a coordinated and consolidated Union strategy against trafficking in human beings, Member States shall facilitate the tasks of an EU anti-trafficking coordinator (EU ATC). In particular, Member States shall transmit to the EU ATC at least the information referred to in Article 19. 2. In order to ensure a coherent and comprehensive approach, the EU ATC shall ensure coordination with national anti-trafficking coordinators or equivalent mechanisms, independent bodies, Union agencies, and with relevant civil society organisations active in the field, including for the purposes of the contribution from the EU ATC to the reporting carried out by the Commission every 2 years on the progress made in the fight against trafficking in human beings.
Article 21 Replacement of Framework Decision 2002/629/JHA
Framework Decision 2002/629/JHA on combating trafficking in human beings is hereby replaced in relation to Member States participating in the adoption of this Directive, without prejudice to the obligations of the Member States relating to the time limit for transposition of the Framework Decision into national law. In relation to Member States participating in the adoption of this Directive, references to the Framework Decision 2002/629/JHA shall be construed as references to this Directive.
Article 22 Transposition
1. Member States shall bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive by 6 April 2013. 2. Member States shall transmit to the Commission the text of the provisions transposing into their national law the obligations imposed on them under this Directive. 3. When Member States adopt these measures, they shall contain a reference to this Directive or shall be accompanied by such a reference on the occasion of their official publication. The methods of making such reference shall be laid down by the Member States.
Article 23 Reporting
1. The Commission shall, by 6 April 2015, submit a report to the European Parliament and the Council, assessing the extent to which the Member States have taken the necessary measures in order to comply with this Directive, including a description of action taken under Article 18(4), accompanied, if necessary, by legislative proposals. 2. The Commission shall, by 6 April 2016, submit a report to the European Parliament and the Council, assessing the impact of existing national law, establishing as a criminal offence the use of services which are the objects of exploitation of trafficking in human beings, on the prevention of trafficking in human beings, accompanied, if necessary, by adequate proposals.
Amendment rationale: CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL Reasons for and objectives of the proposal This proposal sets out a series of measures to better prevent and combat trafficking in human beings and to protect its victims under the legal framework in pl ace in the Union , namely Directive 2011/36/EU 1 ( “ the Anti-trafficking Directive ” ). The Anti-trafficking Directive provides an overarching EU framework to prevent and combat trafficking in human beings by establishing minimum rules concerning the definition of criminal offences and sanctions in the area of trafficking in human beings , and by introducing provisions to strengthen the prevention of this crime an d the protection of the victims , while taking into account the gender perspective 2 . The Directive provides EU common rules on : (i) criminalisation, investigation and prosecution of trafficking in human beings, including the definition of offences, penalties and sanctions; (ii) assistance and support to, and protection of, victims of trafficking in human beings; and (iii) prevention of trafficking in human beings 3 . The adoption of the Anti-trafficking Directive in April 2011 was a key development towards enhancing EU efforts to prevent and combat trafficking in human beings, and to protect its victims. It was a crucial step towards harmonisation of the relevant rules across the Member States. However, a number of challenges have arisen or gained importance since 2011. These are addressed through this targeted revision of the Directive. The correct and complete transposition of the Directive and its full implementation remain s a priority for the Commission. Following the adoption of the transposition report 4 t he Commission continued the engagement with the Member State s and committed to use the powers conferred to it by the Treaties to ensure full transposition and implementation of its provisions . By taking a multi-disciplinary and comprehensive approach , the Commission adopted the EU Strategy on combatting trafficking in human beings 2021-2025 5 set ting out detailed actions aimed at improving the implement at i on of the relevant provisions of Directive 2011/36/EU . It provides a robust policy response to combatting trafficking in human beings, from prevention through to protection of victims, to prosecution and conviction of traffickers. The forms of exploitation have evolved since 2011 . S exual and labour exploitation have consistently been the main purposes of trafficking in human beings . Trafficking for sexual exploitation has continuously been the most prevalent form of exploitation in the EU accounting for over a half of all victims and affecting predominantly women and girls 6 . Trafficking for the purpose of labour exploitation has been the second most frequent form of trafficking in the EU , with the number of victims rapidly increasing and nearly doubling in the last five years 7 . However , trafficking for other purposes has gained more prominence over time both as regards forms of exploitation already included in the Anti-trafficking Directive ( begging, exploitation of criminal activities and the removal of organs) as well as forms not explicitly mentioned therein (including forced marriage and illegal adoption) . The overall percentage of other purposes of exploitation represents more than 10% of all victims . This proposal seeks to expand the non-exhaustive list of forms of exploitation explicitly mentioned in the Directive as to include forced marriage and illegal adoption , in order to ensure that national legal systems cover an increasing number of trafficking purposes . The modi operandi of traffickers, who often operate in the framework of organised crime, have also evolved resulting in an increased threat of trafficking in human beings. Advances in technology allow traffickers to recruit, advertise and exploit victims remotely, and to widely share exploitative materials online. The same technological means make it more difficult to detect the crime, identify the perpetrators, and track down the money used to commit offences and the profits generated by the crime. This proposal seeks to address the challenges posed by the increasing digitalisation of trafficking in human beings and to enhance the criminal law response to technology-facilitated offences. Especially in recent years, relevant stakeholders, including EU Agencies, law enforcement and judicial authorities, international and civil society organisations, have highlighted the concern of the growing number of trafficking offences committed or facilitated by means of information and communication technologies. The optional regime of sanctions on legal persons currently in force, as well as the extent to which it is transposed and applied in Member States, does not sufficiently meet the aims of the Anti-trafficking Directive. While still ensuring that sanctions are effective, proportionate and dissuasive, this proposal seeks to enhance the criminal justice response to trafficking offences committed for the benefit of legal persons by replacing the optional regime of sanctions with two different mandatory regimes that apply in case of standard offences and of aggravated offences. The adoption of the Anti-trafficking Directive in 2011 pre-dates the EU legal framework on freezing and confiscation. Therefore, the Commission proposes to update the reference to tracing, freezing, management and confiscation of proceeds by making explicit reference to the EU rules on these matters. Substantial room for improvement remains in the early identification and referral practices of Member States, both at the national and cross-border levels. In particular, not all Member States have a national referral mechanism in place and the structure and functioning of such mechanisms varies considerably across Member States. This proposal seeks to ensure that all Member States establish by laws, regulations or administrative provisions national referral mechanism, with a view to streamlining the functioning of relevant national institutions and to bringing further harmonisation in their structures and practices on referral to victims to appropriate assistance and support systems. This will also constitute the first step towards the establishment of a European Referral Mechanism. The information gathered from recent studies and consultations with relevant stakeholders show that the demand that fosters trafficking has not decreased despite the wealth of relevant education, training and awareness raising activities, and the transposition of Article 18(4) of the Anti-trafficking Directive in a number of Member States. Despite all multi-stakeholder efforts, the demand for sexual services, cheap labour and products persists. This, in turn, fuels trafficking for the purpose of sexual and labour exploitation. This proposal aims to bring further harmonisation across Member States’ with a view to reducing demand. The proposal also recognises that criminal law is only part of the demand reduction response, and it should continue to be accompanied by education, training and awareness raising activities, in line with the Anti-trafficking Directive. Trafficking in human beings is a complex crime. In order to address it appropriately, it is crucial to rely on coherent and reliable data. Similarly to other crime areas, it is estimated that an important part of trafficking cases is not reported. This is one of the factors hampering full understanding of the scope of trafficking in human beings within the EU. In addition, there are important gaps in the data collection on reported cases, and statistics gathered by the Commission are made public with substantial delay after the reporting period. This proposal aims to require Member States to collect and report to the Commission data on trafficking in human beings every year, and to further harmonise data collection, with a view to enhancing its quality and accelerating the publication of data reports.
Revised version (Article 23 Reporting):
1. The Commission shall, by 6 April 2015, submit a report to the European Parliament and the Council, assessing the extent to which the Member States have taken the necessary measures in order to comply with this Directive, including a description of action taken under Article 18(4), accompanied, if necessary, by legislative proposals. 2. The Commission shall, by 6 April 2016, submit a report to the European Parliament and the Council, assessing the impact of existing national law, establishing as a criminal offence the use of services which are the objects of exploitation of trafficking in human beings, on the prevention of trafficking in human beings, accompanied, if necessary, by adequate proposals. 3. The Commission shall, by 15 July 2030, submit a report to the European Parliament and to the Council, assessing the extent to which the Member States have taken the necessary measures in order to comply with this Directive, and assessing the impact of such measures.
Article 24 Entry into force
This Directive shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union .
Article 25 Addressees
This Directive is addressed to the Member States in accordance with the Treaties.