Article 1 Subject matter and scope
This Regulation aims to: (a) set the basis for an efficient achievement of the objectives of the Energy Union and in particular the climate and energy framework for 2030 by enabling market signals to be delivered for increased efficiency, higher share of renewable energy sources, security of supply, flexibility, sustainability, decarbonisation and innovation; (b) set fundamental principles for well-functioning, integrated electricity markets, which allow all resource providers and electricity customers non-discriminatory market access, empower consumers, ensure competitiveness on the global market as well as demand response, energy storage and energy efficiency, and facilitate aggregation of distributed demand and supply, and enable market and sectoral integration and market-based remuneration of electricity generated from renewable sources; (c) set fair rules for cross-border exchanges in electricity, thus enhancing competition within the internal market for electricity, taking into account the particular characteristics of national and regional markets, including the establishment of a compensation mechanism for cross-border flows of electricity, the setting of harmonised principles on cross-border transmission charges and the allocation of available capacities of interconnections between national transmission systems; (d) facilitate the emergence of a well-functioning and transparent wholesale market, contributing to a high level of security of electricity supply, and provide for mechanisms to harmonise the rules for cross-border exchanges in electricity.
Amendment rationale: CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL Reasons for and objectives of the proposal 1.1. Policy context Energy prices significantly increased throughout 2021 and 2022. This resulted from reductions in gas supply, particularly after the start of Russia’s war against Ukraine and the weaponisation of energy as well as from domestic shortfalls in hydropower and nuclear power. The price rises also resulted from increased energy demand, as the global economy picked up after the COVID-19 pandemic. These price rises were rapidly felt by households, industry and businesses across the EU, and governments immediately took steps to mitigate them. At the European level, the EU swiftly provided an energy prices toolbox 1 with measures to address high prices , in particular for the most vulnerable consumers (including income support, tax breaks, gas saving and storage measures), as well as the REPowerEU plan 2 with further measures and funding to boost energy efficiency and renewable energy in order to reduce dependence on Russian fossil fuels. This was followed by the creation of a temporary State Aid regime 3 to allow certain measures to soften the impact of high prices, a strong gas storage regime 4 , effective demand reduction measures for gas 5 and electricity 6 , faster renewable energy and grid permitting processes 7 , and price limiting regimes to avoid windfall profits in both the gas and electricity markets 8 . These short-term measures helped Member States to deal with the immediate fall-out of the energy crisis. However, the crisis also showed how exposed consumers and industries are and our lack of resilience to energy price spikes. The impact of fossil fuel-based generation on setting electricity prices was seen as excessive by businesses and citizens, while Member States’ ability to cushion short term prices with longer term contracts appeared inadequate. For this reason, the European Commission President announced in the 2022 State of the Union Address 9 the need for a fundamental reform of the electricity market design. Whilst the EU’s internal energy market delivers huge gains and growth across Europe, the recent energy crisis has highlighted that the energy market design’s short-term focus can distract from broader, longer-term goals. The reflection of short-term prices in consumers bills led to price shocks where energy bills of many consumers tripled or quadrupled, even as the costs of wind and solar power were declining; the sudden exposure to volatile and high prices triggered some supplier bankruptcies; many industrial enterprises in energy intensive sectors were obliged to shut down. Therefore, the proposal includes a set of measures aimed to create a buffer between short-term markets and electricity bills paid by consumers, in particular by way of incentivizing longer term contracting, to improve the functioning of short-term markets to better integrate renewables and enhance the role of flexibility and to empower and protect consumers. The recent price volatility has also highlighted the lack of flexibility in the electricity grid, with prices set too often by gas-fired generation and with a general lack of low carbon flexible supply, demand response and energy storage. As more wind and solar power enter the system, low-carbon flexible technologies will be needed to balance the variable supply with variable demand. In parallel with this proposal, the Commission is making recommendations for the advancement of storage innovation, technologies, and capacities. More broadly, the sensitivity of the electricity price to fossil fuel prices highlighted the need to speed up the deployment of renewables together with the flexibility of the power system to displace fossil fuels. REPowerEU provides such a boost to renewable energy and with it, a boost to economic growth and quality jobs creation . It builds on the European Green Deal’s drive to improve European competitiveness through innovation and the transition to a net zero economy and is closely aligned with the Commission’s Green Deal Industrial Plan. To facilitate the investments needed in the face of recent price volatility, uncoordinated regulatory interventions and grid and regulatory barriers to entry, fundamental reform is needed. Finally, in the Report on the final outcome of the Conference on the Future of Europe, citizens asked the EU institutions to take measures to “Enhance European energy security, and achieve the EU’s energy independence” and to ‘Reduce dependency of EU from foreign actors in economically strategic sectors’, including energy 10 1.2. Objectives of the proposal The proposal is addressing consumer, industry and investors’ concerns over exposure to volatile short-term prices, driven by high prices of fossil fuels. It will optimize the electricity market design by complementing the short-term markets with a greater role for longer-term instruments, allowing consumers to benefit from more fixed priced contracts, and facilitating investments in clean technologies. Ultimately, it will mean that less fossil fuel generation is needed and will lead to lower prices for consumers during future fossil fuel crisis due to the low operational costs of renewable and low carbon energy. The proposal is putting forward measures to protect consumers from such volatility, empower them with greater contract choice and more direct access to renewable and low carbon energy. To improve investment conditions for businesses, in particular those pursuing decarbonisation pathways. it proposes measures to counter exposure to short term price spikes through power purchase agreements and more prudential obligations for energy suppliers. It also proposes measures to improve the way variable renewable and low carbon energies are integrated into the short-term market. This includes measures boosting the use of demand response and storage, among other forms of non-fossil flexibility. The proposal also improves and clarifies access to longer term contracts for developers (both State supported such as contracts for difference, and private, such as power purchase agreements) in order to provide secure, stable revenues for renewable and low carbon energy developers and bring down risk and capital costs while avoiding windfall profits in periods of high prices. Whilst the current market design has over many decades delivered an efficient, increasingly integrated market, the energy crisis has highlighted a number of shortcomings relating to: (i) insufficient tools to protect consumers, including businesses, against high short term prices; (ii) the excessive influence of fossil fuel prices on electricity prices and the failure for low cost renewables and low carbon energy to be better reflected in electricity bills; (iii) the impact of extreme price volatility and regulatory interventions on investment; (iv) the lack of sufficient non-fossil flexibility (such as storage or demand response) that could reduce dependence on gas-fired generation; (v) the limited choice of supplier contract types; (vi) the difficulties to directly access renewable energy though energy sharing; and (vii) the need for robust monitoring of the energy market to better protect against market abuse. To protect consumers from volatile prices, the proposal will provide for the right to fixed price contacts as well as dynamic price contracts, the right to multiple contracts and to better and clearer contract information. Consumers will be offered variety of contracts that best fits their circumstances. In this way, consumers, including small businesses, can lock in secure, long-term prices to mitigate the impact of sudden price shocks, and/or they may choose to have dynamic pricing contracts with suppliers if they wish to take advantage of price variability to use electricity when it is cheaper (e.g., to charge electric cars or use heat pumps). Such a combination of both dynamic and fixed pricing allows to keep market incentives for consumers to adjust their electricity demand, while providing more certainty also for those who wish to invest in renewable energy sources (rooftop solar panels for instance) and stability of costs. In addition to the existing protection framework for energy poor and vulnerable consumers, the proposal will also provide access to regulated retail prices for households and SME consumers in the event of a crisis and stabilise the supply industry by requiring that suppliers make more effort to guard against high price spikes by making greater use of forward contracts with generators (locking in future prices) and by requiring Member States to establish a supplier of last resort regime. The proposal will empower consumers by creating the right to share renewable energy directly, without the need to create energy communities. Greater energy sharing (e.g., sharing surplus roof top solar power with a neighbour) can improve the use made of low cost renewable energy and provide greater access to direct use of renewable energy for consumers who might not otherwise have such access. To enhance stability and predictability of the cost of energy, thereby contributing to the competitiveness of the EU economy facing excessive volatile prices, the proposal intends to enhance market access to more stable longer-term contracts and markets. Power purchase agreements (PPAs) - long-term private contracts between a generator (typically renewable or low carbon) and a consumer – can protect against price volatility, but they are currently mostly available only to large energy consumers in very few Member States. A barrier to the growth of this market is the credit risk that a consumer will not always be able to buy the electricity over the whole period. To address this, Member States should ensure that instruments to reduce the financial risks associated to off-taker payment default in the framework of PPAs, including guarantee schemes at market prices, are accessible to companies that face entry barriers to the PPA market and are not in financial difficulty. To further encourage the growth of the market for such agreements, renewable and low carbon energy project developers participating in a public support tender should be allowed to reserve a share of the generation for sale through a PPA. In addition, Member States should endeavour to apply in some of these tenders' evaluation criteria to incentivise the access to the PPA market for customers that face entry barriers. Finally, the obligation on suppliers to hedge appropriately may also boost demand for PPAs (which are a way of locking in future prices). Some forms of public support guarantee the energy producer a minimum price by the government but allow for the producer to nevertheless earn the full market price even when this market price is very high. With the recent high prices much (cheap) publicly supported energy has been receiving these high market prices. To curb this and so stabilise prices, investment support should be structured as “two-way” (two-way contract for difference), which set a minimum price but also a maximum price, so any revenues above the ceiling are paid back. The proposal will apply to new investments for the generation of electricity, which include investments in new power-generating facilities, investments aimed at repowering existing power-generating facilities, investments aimed at extending existing power-generating facilities or at prolonging their lifetime. Moreover, the proposal will require that such money is then channelled to support all electricity consumers in proportion to their consumption to mitigate the effect of high prices. A further means of guarding against volatile prices is to use long term contracts that lock in future prices (“forward contracts”). This market shows low liquidity in many Member States but could be boosted across the EU, so that more suppliers or consumers can guard against excessively volatile prices over longer periods of time. The proposal will create regional reference prices via a hub to increase price transparency and oblige system operators to allow transmission rights longer than a year, so that if a forward contract is between parties across regions or borders, they can ensure transmission of the electricity. Finally, to ensure markets that behave competitively and prices are set transparently, regulators’ ability to monitor energy market integrity and transparency will be enhanced. The third objective is to boost renewable energy investment, in order to ensure that deployment triples, in line with European Green Deal goals. This will be achieved partly by improving the markets for long term contracts. Power purchase agreements and contracts for difference not only provide consumers with stable prices, they also give renewable energy suppliers reliable revenues. This lowers their financial risk and greatly reduces their cost of capital. This creates a virtuous circle where stable revenues lower costs and boost demand for renewable energy. Renewable energy is also a better investment when its ability to produce power is not curtailed due to technical constraints in the system. The more flexible the system is (generation that can rapidly turn on or off, storage that can absorb or put power onto the system, or responsive consumers who can increase or decrease their demand for power) the more stable prices can be and the more renewable energy the system can integrate. For this reason, the proposal requires Member States to assess their needs for power system flexibility, establish objectives to deliver on these needs. Member States can design or redesign capacity mechanisms in order to promote low-carbon flexibility. Moreover, the proposal opens the possibility for Member States to introduce new support schemes for non-fossil flexibility such as demand side response and storage. System operators should also play an enhanced role integrating renewables into the grid, partly by increasing transparency surrounding availability of grid connection capacity. First, this clearer information would enhance renewable energy developers’ ability to develop renewables in areas where the grid is less congested. Second, renewable energy can be more efficiently traded and balanced in the system if trades between market participants can take place closer to “real time”. If offers to supply electricity are made minutes before consumption rather than hours before consumption, the offers from wind and solar power producers are more accurate, more wind and solar power can be consumed and the “imbalance costs” of the system are reduced. Thus, trading deadlines will be brought closer to real time. 
Revised version (Article 1 Subject matter and scope):
This Regulation aims to: (a) set the basis for an efficient achievement of the objectives of the Energy Union and the objective to achieve climate neutrality by 2050 at the latest, in particular the climate and energy framework for 2030 by enabling market signals to be delivered for increased efficiency, higher share of renewable energy, security of supply, flexibility, system integration through multiple energy carriers, sustainability, decarbonisation and innovation; (b) set fundamental principles for well-functioning, integrated electricity markets, which allow all resource providers and electricity customers non-discriminatory market access, enable the development of forward electricity markets to allow suppliers and consumers to hedge or protect themselves against the risk of future volatility in electricity prices, empower and protect consumers, ensure competitiveness on the global market, enhance security of supply and flexibility through demand response, energy storage and other non-fossil flexibility solutions, ensure energy efficiency, facilitate aggregation of distributed demand and supply, and enable market and sectoral integration and market-based remuneration of electricity generated from renewable energy; (c) set fair rules for cross-border exchanges in electricity, thus enhancing competition within the internal market for electricity, taking into account the particular characteristics of national and regional markets, including the establishment of a compensation mechanism for cross-border flows of electricity, the setting of harmonised principles on cross-border transmission charges and the allocation of available capacities of interconnections between national transmission systems; (d) facilitate the emergence of a well-functioning and transparent wholesale market, contributing to a high level of security of electricity supply, and provide for mechanisms to harmonise the rules for cross-border exchanges in electricity; (e) support long-term investment in renewable energy generation, flexibility and grids to enable consumers to make their energy bills affordable and less dependent from fluctuations of short-term electricity market prices, in particular fossil fuel prices in the medium to long-term; (f) lay down a framework for the adoption of measures to address electricity price crises.
Article 2 Definitions
The following definitions apply: (1) ‘interconnector’ means a transmission line which crosses or spans a border between Member States and which connects the national transmission systems of the Member States; (3) ‘cross-border flow’ means a physical flow of electricity on a transmission network of a Member State that results from the impact of the activity of producers, customers, or both, outside that Member State on its transmission network; (4) ‘congestion’ means a situation in which all requests from market participants to trade between network areas cannot be accommodated because they would significantly affect the physical flows on network elements which cannot accommodate those flows; (5) ‘new interconnector’ means an interconnector not completed by 4 August 2003; (6) ‘structural congestion’ means congestion in the transmission system that is capable of being unambiguously defined, is predictable, is geographically stable over time, and frequently reoccurs under normal electricity system conditions; (7) ‘market operator’ means an entity that provides a service whereby the offers to sell electricity are matched with bids to buy electricity; (8) ‘nominated electricity market operator’ or ‘NEMO’ means a market operator designated by the competent authority to carry out tasks related to single day-ahead or single intraday coupling; (9) ‘value of lost load’ means an estimation in euro/MWh, of the maximum electricity price that customers are willing to pay to avoid an outage; (10) ‘balancing’ means all actions and processes, in all timelines, through which transmission system operators ensure, in an ongoing manner, maintenance of the system frequency within a predefined stability range and compliance with the amount of reserves needed with respect to the required quality; (11) ‘balancing energy’ means energy used by transmission system operators to carry out balancing; (12) ‘balancing service provider’ means a market participant providing either or both balancing energy and balancing capacity to transmission system operators; (13) ‘balancing capacity’ means a volume of capacity that a balancing service provider has agreed to hold and in respect to which the balancing service provider has agreed to submit bids for a corresponding volume of balancing energy to the transmission system operator for the duration of the contract; (14) ‘balance responsible party’ means a market participant or its chosen representative responsible for its imbalances in the electricity market; (15) ‘imbalance settlement period’ means the time unit for which the imbalance of the balance responsible parties is calculated; (16) ‘imbalance price’ means the price, be it positive, zero or negative, in each imbalance settlement period for an imbalance in each direction; (17) ‘imbalance price area’ means the area in which an imbalance price is calculated; (18) ‘prequalification process’ means the process to verify the compliance of a provider of balancing capacity with the requirements set by the transmission system operators; (19) ‘reserve capacity’ means the amount of frequency containment reserves, frequency restoration reserves or replacement reserves that needs to be available to the transmission system operator; (20) ‘priority dispatch’ means, with regard to the self-dispatch model, the dispatch of power plants on the basis of criteria which are different from the economic order of bids and, with regard to the central dispatch model, the dispatch of power plants on the basis of criteria which are different from the economic order of bids and from network constraints, giving priority to the dispatch of particular generation technologies; (21) ‘capacity calculation region’ means the geographic area in which the coordinated capacity calculation is applied; (22) ‘capacity mechanism’ means a temporary measure to ensure the achievement of the necessary level of resource adequacy by remunerating resources for their availability, excluding measures relating to ancillary services or congestion management; (23) ‘high-efficiency cogeneration’ means cogeneration which meets the criteria laid down in Annex II to Directive 2012/27/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council ( 1 ); (24) ‘demonstration project’ means a project which demonstrates a technology as a first of its kind in the Union and represents a significant innovation that goes well beyond the state of the art; (25) ‘market participant’ means a natural or legal person who buys, sells or generates electricity, who is engaged in aggregation or who is an operator of demand response or energy storage services, including through the placing of orders to trade, in one or more electricity markets, including in balancing energy markets; (26) ‘redispatching’ means a measure, including curtailment, that is activated by one or more transmission system operators or distribution system operators by altering the generation, load pattern, or both, in order to change physical flows in the electricity system and relieve a physical congestion or otherwise ensure system security; (27) ‘countertrading’ means a cross-zonal exchange initiated by system operators between two bidding zones to relieve physical congestion; (28) ‘power-generating facility’ means a facility that converts primary energy into electrical energy and which consists of one or more power-generating modules connected to a network; (29) ‘central dispatching model’ means a scheduling and dispatching model where the generation schedules and consumption schedules as well as dispatching of power-generating facilities and demand facilities, in reference to dispatchable facilities, are determined by a transmission system operator within an integrated scheduling process; (30) ‘self-dispatch model’ means a scheduling and dispatching model where the generation schedules and consumption schedules as well as dispatching of power-generating facilities and demand facilities are determined by the scheduling agents of those facilities; (31) ‘standard balancing product’ means a harmonised balancing product defined by all transmission system operators for the exchange of balancing services; (32) ‘specific balancing product’ means a balancing product different from a standard balancing product; (33) ‘delegated operator’ means an entity to whom specific tasks or obligations entrusted to a transmission system operator or nominated electricity market operator under this Regulation or other Union legal acts have been delegated by that transmission system operator or NEMO or have been assigned by a Member State or regulatory authority; (63) ‘regional coordination centre’ means regional coordination centre established pursuant to Article 35 of this Regulation; (65) ‘bidding zone’ means the largest geographical area within which market participants are able to exchange energy without capacity allocation; (66) ‘capacity allocation’ means the attribution of cross-zonal capacity; (67) ‘control area’ means a coherent part of the interconnected system, operated by a single system operator and shall include connected physical loads and/or generation units if any; (68) ‘coordinated net transmission capacity’ means a capacity calculation method based on the principle of assessing and defining ex ante a maximum energy exchange between adjacent bidding zones; (69) ‘critical network element’ means a network element either within a bidding zone or between bidding zones taken into account in the capacity calculation process, limiting the amount of power that can be exchanged; (70) ‘cross-zonal capacity’ means the capability of the interconnected system to accommodate energy transfer between bidding zones; (71) ‘generation unit’ means a single electricity generator belonging to a production unit.
Amendment rationale: CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL Reasons for and objectives of the proposal 1.1. Policy context Energy prices significantly increased throughout 2021 and 2022. This resulted from reductions in gas supply, particularly after the start of Russia’s war against Ukraine and the weaponisation of energy as well as from domestic shortfalls in hydropower and nuclear power. The price rises also resulted from increased energy demand, as the global economy picked up after the COVID-19 pandemic. These price rises were rapidly felt by households, industry and businesses across the EU, and governments immediately took steps to mitigate them. At the European level, the EU swiftly provided an energy prices toolbox 1 with measures to address high prices , in particular for the most vulnerable consumers (including income support, tax breaks, gas saving and storage measures), as well as the REPowerEU plan 2 with further measures and funding to boost energy efficiency and renewable energy in order to reduce dependence on Russian fossil fuels. This was followed by the creation of a temporary State Aid regime 3 to allow certain measures to soften the impact of high prices, a strong gas storage regime 4 , effective demand reduction measures for gas 5 and electricity 6 , faster renewable energy and grid permitting processes 7 , and price limiting regimes to avoid windfall profits in both the gas and electricity markets 8 . These short-term measures helped Member States to deal with the immediate fall-out of the energy crisis. However, the crisis also showed how exposed consumers and industries are and our lack of resilience to energy price spikes. The impact of fossil fuel-based generation on setting electricity prices was seen as excessive by businesses and citizens, while Member States’ ability to cushion short term prices with longer term contracts appeared inadequate. For this reason, the European Commission President announced in the 2022 State of the Union Address 9 the need for a fundamental reform of the electricity market design. Whilst the EU’s internal energy market delivers huge gains and growth across Europe, the recent energy crisis has highlighted that the energy market design’s short-term focus can distract from broader, longer-term goals. The reflection of short-term prices in consumers bills led to price shocks where energy bills of many consumers tripled or quadrupled, even as the costs of wind and solar power were declining; the sudden exposure to volatile and high prices triggered some supplier bankruptcies; many industrial enterprises in energy intensive sectors were obliged to shut down. Therefore, the proposal includes a set of measures aimed to create a buffer between short-term markets and electricity bills paid by consumers, in particular by way of incentivizing longer term contracting, to improve the functioning of short-term markets to better integrate renewables and enhance the role of flexibility and to empower and protect consumers. The recent price volatility has also highlighted the lack of flexibility in the electricity grid, with prices set too often by gas-fired generation and with a general lack of low carbon flexible supply, demand response and energy storage. As more wind and solar power enter the system, low-carbon flexible technologies will be needed to balance the variable supply with variable demand. In parallel with this proposal, the Commission is making recommendations for the advancement of storage innovation, technologies, and capacities. More broadly, the sensitivity of the electricity price to fossil fuel prices highlighted the need to speed up the deployment of renewables together with the flexibility of the power system to displace fossil fuels. REPowerEU provides such a boost to renewable energy and with it, a boost to economic growth and quality jobs creation . It builds on the European Green Deal’s drive to improve European competitiveness through innovation and the transition to a net zero economy and is closely aligned with the Commission’s Green Deal Industrial Plan. To facilitate the investments needed in the face of recent price volatility, uncoordinated regulatory interventions and grid and regulatory barriers to entry, fundamental reform is needed. Finally, in the Report on the final outcome of the Conference on the Future of Europe, citizens asked the EU institutions to take measures to “Enhance European energy security, and achieve the EU’s energy independence” and to ‘Reduce dependency of EU from foreign actors in economically strategic sectors’, including energy 10 1.2. Objectives of the proposal The proposal is addressing consumer, industry and investors’ concerns over exposure to volatile short-term prices, driven by high prices of fossil fuels. It will optimize the electricity market design by complementing the short-term markets with a greater role for longer-term instruments, allowing consumers to benefit from more fixed priced contracts, and facilitating investments in clean technologies. Ultimately, it will mean that less fossil fuel generation is needed and will lead to lower prices for consumers during future fossil fuel crisis due to the low operational costs of renewable and low carbon energy. The proposal is putting forward measures to protect consumers from such volatility, empower them with greater contract choice and more direct access to renewable and low carbon energy. To improve investment conditions for businesses, in particular those pursuing decarbonisation pathways. it proposes measures to counter exposure to short term price spikes through power purchase agreements and more prudential obligations for energy suppliers. It also proposes measures to improve the way variable renewable and low carbon energies are integrated into the short-term market. This includes measures boosting the use of demand response and storage, among other forms of non-fossil flexibility. The proposal also improves and clarifies access to longer term contracts for developers (both State supported such as contracts for difference, and private, such as power purchase agreements) in order to provide secure, stable revenues for renewable and low carbon energy developers and bring down risk and capital costs while avoiding windfall profits in periods of high prices. Whilst the current market design has over many decades delivered an efficient, increasingly integrated market, the energy crisis has highlighted a number of shortcomings relating to: (i) insufficient tools to protect consumers, including businesses, against high short term prices; (ii) the excessive influence of fossil fuel prices on electricity prices and the failure for low cost renewables and low carbon energy to be better reflected in electricity bills; (iii) the impact of extreme price volatility and regulatory interventions on investment; (iv) the lack of sufficient non-fossil flexibility (such as storage or demand response) that could reduce dependence on gas-fired generation; (v) the limited choice of supplier contract types; (vi) the difficulties to directly access renewable energy though energy sharing; and (vii) the need for robust monitoring of the energy market to better protect against market abuse. To protect consumers from volatile prices, the proposal will provide for the right to fixed price contacts as well as dynamic price contracts, the right to multiple contracts and to better and clearer contract information. Consumers will be offered variety of contracts that best fits their circumstances. In this way, consumers, including small businesses, can lock in secure, long-term prices to mitigate the impact of sudden price shocks, and/or they may choose to have dynamic pricing contracts with suppliers if they wish to take advantage of price variability to use electricity when it is cheaper (e.g., to charge electric cars or use heat pumps). Such a combination of both dynamic and fixed pricing allows to keep market incentives for consumers to adjust their electricity demand, while providing more certainty also for those who wish to invest in renewable energy sources (rooftop solar panels for instance) and stability of costs. In addition to the existing protection framework for energy poor and vulnerable consumers, the proposal will also provide access to regulated retail prices for households and SME consumers in the event of a crisis and stabilise the supply industry by requiring that suppliers make more effort to guard against high price spikes by making greater use of forward contracts with generators (locking in future prices) and by requiring Member States to establish a supplier of last resort regime. The proposal will empower consumers by creating the right to share renewable energy directly, without the need to create energy communities. Greater energy sharing (e.g., sharing surplus roof top solar power with a neighbour) can improve the use made of low cost renewable energy and provide greater access to direct use of renewable energy for consumers who might not otherwise have such access. To enhance stability and predictability of the cost of energy, thereby contributing to the competitiveness of the EU economy facing excessive volatile prices, the proposal intends to enhance market access to more stable longer-term contracts and markets. Power purchase agreements (PPAs) - long-term private contracts between a generator (typically renewable or low carbon) and a consumer – can protect against price volatility, but they are currently mostly available only to large energy consumers in very few Member States. A barrier to the growth of this market is the credit risk that a consumer will not always be able to buy the electricity over the whole period. To address this, Member States should ensure that instruments to reduce the financial risks associated to off-taker payment default in the framework of PPAs, including guarantee schemes at market prices, are accessible to companies that face entry barriers to the PPA market and are not in financial difficulty. To further encourage the growth of the market for such agreements, renewable and low carbon energy project developers participating in a public support tender should be allowed to reserve a share of the generation for sale through a PPA. In addition, Member States should endeavour to apply in some of these tenders' evaluation criteria to incentivise the access to the PPA market for customers that face entry barriers. Finally, the obligation on suppliers to hedge appropriately may also boost demand for PPAs (which are a way of locking in future prices). Some forms of public support guarantee the energy producer a minimum price by the government but allow for the producer to nevertheless earn the full market price even when this market price is very high. With the recent high prices much (cheap) publicly supported energy has been receiving these high market prices. To curb this and so stabilise prices, investment support should be structured as “two-way” (two-way contract for difference), which set a minimum price but also a maximum price, so any revenues above the ceiling are paid back. The proposal will apply to new investments for the generation of electricity, which include investments in new power-generating facilities, investments aimed at repowering existing power-generating facilities, investments aimed at extending existing power-generating facilities or at prolonging their lifetime. Moreover, the proposal will require that such money is then channelled to support all electricity consumers in proportion to their consumption to mitigate the effect of high prices. A further means of guarding against volatile prices is to use long term contracts that lock in future prices (“forward contracts”). This market shows low liquidity in many Member States but could be boosted across the EU, so that more suppliers or consumers can guard against excessively volatile prices over longer periods of time. The proposal will create regional reference prices via a hub to increase price transparency and oblige system operators to allow transmission rights longer than a year, so that if a forward contract is between parties across regions or borders, they can ensure transmission of the electricity. Finally, to ensure markets that behave competitively and prices are set transparently, regulators’ ability to monitor energy market integrity and transparency will be enhanced. The third objective is to boost renewable energy investment, in order to ensure that deployment triples, in line with European Green Deal goals. This will be achieved partly by improving the markets for long term contracts. Power purchase agreements and contracts for difference not only provide consumers with stable prices, they also give renewable energy suppliers reliable revenues. This lowers their financial risk and greatly reduces their cost of capital. This creates a virtuous circle where stable revenues lower costs and boost demand for renewable energy. Renewable energy is also a better investment when its ability to produce power is not curtailed due to technical constraints in the system. The more flexible the system is (generation that can rapidly turn on or off, storage that can absorb or put power onto the system, or responsive consumers who can increase or decrease their demand for power) the more stable prices can be and the more renewable energy the system can integrate. For this reason, the proposal requires Member States to assess their needs for power system flexibility, establish objectives to deliver on these needs. Member States can design or redesign capacity mechanisms in order to promote low-carbon flexibility. Moreover, the proposal opens the possibility for Member States to introduce new support schemes for non-fossil flexibility such as demand side response and storage. System operators should also play an enhanced role integrating renewables into the grid, partly by increasing transparency surrounding availability of grid connection capacity. First, this clearer information would enhance renewable energy developers’ ability to develop renewables in areas where the grid is less congested. Second, renewable energy can be more efficiently traded and balanced in the system if trades between market participants can take place closer to “real time”. If offers to supply electricity are made minutes before consumption rather than hours before consumption, the offers from wind and solar power producers are more accurate, more wind and solar power can be consumed and the “imbalance costs” of the system are reduced. Thus, trading deadlines will be brought closer to real time. 
Revised version (Article 2 Definitions):
The following definitions apply: (1) ‘interconnector’ means a transmission line which crosses or spans a border between Member States and which connects the national transmission systems of the Member States; (3) ‘cross-border flow’ means a physical flow of electricity on a transmission network of a Member State that results from the impact of the activity of producers, customers, or both, outside that Member State on its transmission network; (4) ‘congestion’ means a situation in which all requests from market participants to trade between network areas cannot be accommodated because they would significantly affect the physical flows on network elements which cannot accommodate those flows; (5) ‘new interconnector’ means an interconnector not completed by 4 August 2003; (6) ‘structural congestion’ means congestion in the transmission system that is capable of being unambiguously defined, is predictable, is geographically stable over time, and frequently reoccurs under normal electricity system conditions; (7) ‘market operator’ means an entity that provides a service whereby the offers to sell electricity are matched with bids to buy electricity; (8) ‘nominated electricity market operator’ or ‘NEMO’ means a market operator designated by the competent authority to carry out tasks related to single day-ahead or single intraday coupling; (9) ‘value of lost load’ means an estimation in euro/MWh, of the maximum electricity price that customers are willing to pay to avoid an outage; (10) ‘balancing’ means all actions and processes, in all timelines, through which transmission system operators ensure, in an ongoing manner, maintenance of the system frequency within a predefined stability range and compliance with the amount of reserves needed with respect to the required quality; (11) ‘balancing energy’ means energy used by transmission system operators to carry out balancing; (12) ‘balancing service provider’ means a market participant providing either or both balancing energy and balancing capacity to transmission system operators; (13) ‘balancing capacity’ means a volume of capacity that a balancing service provider has agreed to hold and in respect to which the balancing service provider has agreed to submit bids for a corresponding volume of balancing energy to the transmission system operator for the duration of the contract; (14) ‘balance responsible party’ means a market participant or its chosen representative responsible for its imbalances in the electricity market; (15) ‘imbalance settlement period’ means the time unit for which the imbalance of the balance responsible parties is calculated; (16) ‘imbalance price’ means the price, be it positive, zero or negative, in each imbalance settlement period for an imbalance in each direction; (17) ‘imbalance price area’ means the area in which an imbalance price is calculated; (18) ‘prequalification process’ means the process to verify the compliance of a provider of balancing capacity with the requirements set by the transmission system operators; (19) ‘reserve capacity’ means the amount of frequency containment reserves, frequency restoration reserves or replacement reserves that needs to be available to the transmission system operator; (20) ‘priority dispatch’ means, with regard to the self-dispatch model, the dispatch of power plants on the basis of criteria which are different from the economic order of bids and, with regard to the central dispatch model, the dispatch of power plants on the basis of criteria which are different from the economic order of bids and from network constraints, giving priority to the dispatch of particular generation technologies; (21) ‘capacity calculation region’ means the geographic area in which the coordinated capacity calculation is applied; (22) ‘capacity mechanism’ means a measure to ensure the achievement of the necessary level of resource adequacy by remunerating resources for their availability, excluding measures relating to ancillary services or congestion management; (23) ‘high-efficiency cogeneration’ means cogeneration which meets the criteria laid down in Annex II to Directive 2012/27/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council ( 1 ); (24) ‘demonstration project’ means a project which demonstrates a technology as a first of its kind in the Union and represents a significant innovation that goes well beyond the state of the art; (25) ‘market participant’ means a natural or legal person who buys, sells or generates electricity, who is engaged in aggregation or who is an operator of demand response or energy storage services, including through the placing of orders to trade, in one or more electricity markets, including in balancing energy markets; (26) ‘redispatching’ means a measure, including curtailment, that is activated by one or more transmission system operators or distribution system operators by altering the generation, load pattern, or both, in order to change physical flows in the electricity system and relieve a physical congestion or otherwise ensure system security; (27) ‘countertrading’ means a cross-zonal exchange initiated by system operators between two bidding zones to relieve physical congestion; (28) ‘power-generating facility’ means a facility that converts primary energy into electrical energy and which consists of one or more power-generating modules connected to a network; (29) ‘central dispatching model’ means a scheduling and dispatching model where the generation schedules and consumption schedules as well as dispatching of power-generating facilities and demand facilities, in reference to dispatchable facilities, are determined by a transmission system operator within an integrated scheduling process; (30) ‘self-dispatch model’ means a scheduling and dispatching model where the generation schedules and consumption schedules as well as dispatching of power-generating facilities and demand facilities are determined by the scheduling agents of those facilities; (31) ‘standard balancing product’ means a harmonised balancing product defined by all transmission system operators for the exchange of balancing services; (32) ‘specific balancing product’ means a balancing product different from a standard balancing product; (33) ‘delegated operator’ means an entity to whom specific tasks or obligations entrusted to a transmission system operator or nominated electricity market operator under this Regulation or other Union legal acts have been delegated by that transmission system operator or NEMO or have been assigned by a Member State or regulatory authority; (63) ‘regional coordination centre’ means regional coordination centre established pursuant to Article 35 of this Regulation; (65) ‘bidding zone’ means the largest geographical area within which market participants are able to exchange energy without capacity allocation; (66) ‘capacity allocation’ means the attribution of cross-zonal capacity; (67) ‘control area’ means a coherent part of the interconnected system, operated by a single system operator and shall include connected physical loads and/or generation units if any; (68) ‘coordinated net transmission capacity’ means a capacity calculation method based on the principle of assessing and defining ex ante a maximum energy exchange between adjacent bidding zones; (69) ‘critical network element’ means a network element either within a bidding zone or between bidding zones taken into account in the capacity calculation process, limiting the amount of power that can be exchanged; (70) ‘cross-zonal capacity’ means the capability of the interconnected system to accommodate energy transfer between bidding zones; (71) ‘generation unit’ means a single electricity generator belonging to a production unit; (72) ‘peak hour’ means an hour where, on the basis of the forecasts of transmission system operators and, where applicable, NEMOs, the gross electricity consumption or the gross consumption of electricity generated from sources other than renewable sources or the day-ahead wholesale electricity price is expected to be the highest, taking cross-zonal exchanges into account; (73) ‘peak shaving’ means the ability of market participants to reduce electricity consumption from the grid at peak hours at the request of the system operator; (74) ‘peak-shaving product’ means a market-based product by means of which market participants can provide peak shaving to system operators; (75) ‘regional virtual hub’ means a non-physical region covering more than one bidding zone for which a reference price is set on the basis of a methodology; (76) ‘two-way contract for difference’ means a contract between a power-generating facility operator and a counterpart, usually a public entity, that provides both minimum remuneration protection and a limit to excess remuneration; (77) ‘power purchase agreement’ or ‘PPA’ means a contract under which a natural or legal person agrees to purchase electricity from an electricity producer on a market basis; (78) ‘dedicated measurement device’ means a device linked to or embedded in an asset that provides demand response or flexibility services on the electricity market or to system operators; (79) ‘flexibility’ means the ability of an electricity system to adjust to the variability of generation and consumption patterns and to grid availability, across relevant market timeframes.
Article 3 Principles regarding the operation of electricity markets
Member States, regulatory authorities, transmission system operators, distribution system operators, market operators and delegated operators shall ensure that electricity markets are operated in accordance with the following principles: (a) prices shall be formed on the basis of demand and supply; (b) market rules shall encourage free price formation and shall avoid actions which prevent price formation on the basis of demand and supply; (c) market rules shall facilitate the development of more flexible generation, sustainable low carbon generation, and more flexible demand; (d) customers shall be enabled to benefit from market opportunities and increased competition on retail markets and shall be empowered to act as market participants in the energy market and the energy transition; (e) market participation of final customers and small enterprises shall be enabled by aggregation of generation from multiple power-generating facilities or load from multiple demand response facilities to provide joint offers on the electricity market and be jointly operated in the electricity system, in accordance with Union competition law; (f) market rules shall enable the decarbonisation of the electricity system and thus the economy, including by enabling the integration of electricity from renewable energy sources and by providing incentives for energy efficiency; (g) market rules shall deliver appropriate investment incentives for generation, in particular for long-term investments in a decarbonised and sustainable electricity system, energy storage, energy efficiency and demand response to meet market needs, and shall facilitate fair competition thus ensuring security of supply; (h) barriers to cross-border electricity flows between bidding zones or Member States and cross-border transactions on electricity markets and related services markets shall be progressively removed; (i) market rules shall provide for regional cooperation where effective; (j) safe and sustainable generation, energy storage and demand response shall participate on equal footing in the market, under the requirements provided for in the Union law; (k) all producers shall be directly or indirectly responsible for selling the electricity they generate; (l) market rules shall allow for the development of demonstration projects into sustainable, secure and low-carbon energy sources, technologies or systems which are to be realised and used to the benefit of society; (m) market rules shall enable the efficient dispatch of generation assets, energy storage and demand response; (n) market rules shall allow for entry and exit of electricity generation, energy storage and electricity supply undertakings based on those undertakings' assessment of the economic and financial viability of their operations; (o) in order to allow market participants to be protected against price volatility risks on a market basis, and mitigate uncertainty on future returns on investment, long-term hedging products shall be tradable on exchanges in a transparent manner and long-term electricity supply contracts shall be negotiable over the counter, subject to compliance with Union competition law; (p) market rules shall facilitate trade of products across the Union and. regulatory changes shall take into account effects on both short-term and long-term forward and futures markets and products; (q) market participants shall have a right to obtain access to the transmission networks and distribution networks on objective, transparent and non-discriminatory terms.
Article 4 Just transition
The Commission shall support Member States that put in place a national strategy for the progressive reduction of existing coal and other solid fossil fuel generation and mining capacity through all available means to enable a just transition in regions affected by structural change. The Commission shall assist Member States in addressing the social and economic impacts of the clean energy transition. The Commission shall work in close partnership with the stakeholders in coal and carbon-intensive regions, shall facilitate the access to and use of available funds and programmes, and shall encourage the exchange of good practices, including discussions on industrial roadmaps and reskilling needs.
Article 5 Balance responsibility
1. All market participants shall be responsible for the imbalances they cause in the system (‘balance responsibility’). To that end, market participants shall either be balance responsible parties or shall contractually delegate their responsibility to a balance responsible party of their choice. Each balance responsible party shall be financially responsible for its imbalances and shall strive to be balanced or shall help the electricity system to be balanced. 2. Member States may, without prejudice to Articles 107 and 108 TFEU, provide incentives to market participants which are fully or partly exempted from balancing responsibility to accept full balancing responsibility. 3. When a Member State provides a derogation in accordance with paragraph 2, it shall ensure that the financial responsibility for imbalances is fulfilled by another market participant. 4. For power-generating facilities commissioned from 1 January 2026, point (b) of paragraph 2 shall apply only to generating installations using renewable energy sources with an installed electricity capacity of less than 200 kW.
Article 6 Balancing market
2. The price of balancing energy shall not be pre-determined in contracts for balancing capacity. Procurement processes shall be transparent in accordance with Article 40(4) of Directive (EU) 2019/944, while protecting the confidentiality of commercially sensitive information. 3. Balancing markets shall ensure operational security whilst allowing for maximum use and efficient allocation of cross-zonal capacity across timeframes in accordance with Article 17. 4. The settlement of balancing energy for standard balancing products and specific balancing products shall be based on marginal pricing (pay-as-cleared) unless all regulatory authorities approve an alternative pricing method on the basis of a joint proposal by all transmission system operators following an analysis demonstrating that that alternative pricing method is more efficient. Market participants shall be allowed to bid as close to real time as possible, and balancing energy gate closure times shall not be before the intraday cross-zonal gate closure time. Transmission system operators applying a central dispatching model may establish additional rules in accordance with the guideline on electricity balancing adopted on the basis of Article 6(11) of Regulation (EC) No 714/2009. 5. The imbalances shall be settled at a price that reflects the real-time value of energy. 6. Each imbalance price area shall be equal to a bidding zone, except in the case of a central dispatching model where an imbalance price area may constitute a part of a bidding zone. 7. The dimensioning of reserve capacity shall be performed by the transmission system operators and shall be facilitated at regional level. 8. The procurement of balancing capacity shall be performed by the transmission system operator and may be facilitated at a regional level. Reservation of cross-border capacity to that end may be limited. The procurement of balancing capacity shall be market-based and organised in such a way as to be non-discriminatory between market participants in the prequalification process in accordance with Article 40(4) of Directive (EU) 2019/944 whether market participants participate individually or through aggregation. Procurement of balancing capacity shall be based on a primary market unless and to the extent that the regulatory authority has provided for a derogation to allow the use of other forms of market-based procurement on the grounds of a lack of competition in the market for balancing services. Derogations from the obligation to base the procurement of balancing capacity on use of primary markets shall be reviewed every three years. 9. The procurement of upward balancing capacity and downward balancing capacity shall be carried out separately, unless the regulatory authority approves a derogation from this principle on the basis that this would result in higher economic efficiency as demonstrated by an evaluation performed by the transmission system operator. Contracts for balancing capacity shall not be concluded more than one day before the provision of the balancing capacity and the contracting period shall be no longer than one day, unless and to the extent that the regulatory authority has approved the earlier contracting or longer contracting periods to ensure the security of supply or to improve economic efficiency. Where a derogation is granted, for at least 40 % of the standard balancing products and a minimum of 30 % of all products used for balancing capacity, contracts for the balancing capacity shall be concluded for no more than one day before the provision of the balancing capacity and the contracting period shall be no longer than one day. The contracting of the remaining part of the balancing capacity shall be performed for a maximum of one month in advance of the provision of balancing capacity and shall have a maximum contractual period of one month. 11. Notwithstanding paragraph 10, from 1 January 2026 contract periods shall not be longer than six months. 12. By 1 January 2028, regulatory authorities shall report to the Commission and ACER on the share of the total capacity covered by contracts with a duration or a procurement period of longer than one day. 13. Transmission system operators or their delegated operators shall publish, as close to real time as possible but with a delay after delivery of no more than 30 minutes, the current system balance of their scheduling areas, the estimated imbalance prices and the estimated balancing energy prices. 14. Transmission system operators may, where standard balancing products are not sufficient to ensure operational security or where some balancing resources cannot participate in the balancing market through standard balancing products, propose, and the regulatory authorities may approve, derogations from paragraphs 2 and 4 for specific balancing products which are activated locally without exchanging them with other transmission system operators. Proposals for derogations shall include a description of measures proposed to minimise the use of specific products, subject to economic efficiency, a demonstration that the specific products do not create significant inefficiencies and distortions in the balancing market either inside or outside the scheduling area, as well as, where applicable, the rules and information for the process for converting the balancing energy bids from specific balancing products into balancing energy bids from standard balancing products.
Article 8 Trade on day-ahead and intraday markets
1. NEMOs shall allow market participants to trade energy as close to real time as possible and at least up to the intraday cross-zonal gate closure time. 2. NEMOs shall provide market participants with the opportunity to trade in energy in time intervals which are at least as short as the imbalance settlement period for both day-ahead and intraday markets. 3. NEMOs shall provide products for trading in day-ahead and intraday markets which are sufficiently small in size, with minimum bid sizes of 500 kW or less, to allow for the effective participation of demand-side response, energy storage and small-scale renewables including direct participation by customers. 4. By 1 January 2021, the imbalance settlement period shall be 15 minutes in all scheduling areas, unless regulatory authorities have granted a derogation or an exemption. Derogations may be granted only until 31 December 2024. From 1 January 2025, the imbalance settlement period shall not exceed 30 minutes where an exemption has been granted by all the regulatory authorities within a synchronous area.
Amendment rationale: CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL Reasons for and objectives of the proposal 1.1. Policy context Energy prices significantly increased throughout 2021 and 2022. This resulted from reductions in gas supply, particularly after the start of Russia’s war against Ukraine and the weaponisation of energy as well as from domestic shortfalls in hydropower and nuclear power. The price rises also resulted from increased energy demand, as the global economy picked up after the COVID-19 pandemic. These price rises were rapidly felt by households, industry and businesses across the EU, and governments immediately took steps to mitigate them. At the European level, the EU swiftly provided an energy prices toolbox 1 with measures to address high prices , in particular for the most vulnerable consumers (including income support, tax breaks, gas saving and storage measures), as well as the REPowerEU plan 2 with further measures and funding to boost energy efficiency and renewable energy in order to reduce dependence on Russian fossil fuels. This was followed by the creation of a temporary State Aid regime 3 to allow certain measures to soften the impact of high prices, a strong gas storage regime 4 , effective demand reduction measures for gas 5 and electricity 6 , faster renewable energy and grid permitting processes 7 , and price limiting regimes to avoid windfall profits in both the gas and electricity markets 8 . These short-term measures helped Member States to deal with the immediate fall-out of the energy crisis. However, the crisis also showed how exposed consumers and industries are and our lack of resilience to energy price spikes. The impact of fossil fuel-based generation on setting electricity prices was seen as excessive by businesses and citizens, while Member States’ ability to cushion short term prices with longer term contracts appeared inadequate. For this reason, the European Commission President announced in the 2022 State of the Union Address 9 the need for a fundamental reform of the electricity market design. Whilst the EU’s internal energy market delivers huge gains and growth across Europe, the recent energy crisis has highlighted that the energy market design’s short-term focus can distract from broader, longer-term goals. The reflection of short-term prices in consumers bills led to price shocks where energy bills of many consumers tripled or quadrupled, even as the costs of wind and solar power were declining; the sudden exposure to volatile and high prices triggered some supplier bankruptcies; many industrial enterprises in energy intensive sectors were obliged to shut down. Therefore, the proposal includes a set of measures aimed to create a buffer between short-term markets and electricity bills paid by consumers, in particular by way of incentivizing longer term contracting, to improve the functioning of short-term markets to better integrate renewables and enhance the role of flexibility and to empower and protect consumers. The recent price volatility has also highlighted the lack of flexibility in the electricity grid, with prices set too often by gas-fired generation and with a general lack of low carbon flexible supply, demand response and energy storage. As more wind and solar power enter the system, low-carbon flexible technologies will be needed to balance the variable supply with variable demand. In parallel with this proposal, the Commission is making recommendations for the advancement of storage innovation, technologies, and capacities. More broadly, the sensitivity of the electricity price to fossil fuel prices highlighted the need to speed up the deployment of renewables together with the flexibility of the power system to displace fossil fuels. REPowerEU provides such a boost to renewable energy and with it, a boost to economic growth and quality jobs creation . It builds on the European Green Deal’s drive to improve European competitiveness through innovation and the transition to a net zero economy and is closely aligned with the Commission’s Green Deal Industrial Plan. To facilitate the investments needed in the face of recent price volatility, uncoordinated regulatory interventions and grid and regulatory barriers to entry, fundamental reform is needed. Finally, in the Report on the final outcome of the Conference on the Future of Europe, citizens asked the EU institutions to take measures to “Enhance European energy security, and achieve the EU’s energy independence” and to ‘Reduce dependency of EU from foreign actors in economically strategic sectors’, including energy 10 1.2. Objectives of the proposal The proposal is addressing consumer, industry and investors’ concerns over exposure to volatile short-term prices, driven by high prices of fossil fuels. It will optimize the electricity market design by complementing the short-term markets with a greater role for longer-term instruments, allowing consumers to benefit from more fixed priced contracts, and facilitating investments in clean technologies. Ultimately, it will mean that less fossil fuel generation is needed and will lead to lower prices for consumers during future fossil fuel crisis due to the low operational costs of renewable and low carbon energy. The proposal is putting forward measures to protect consumers from such volatility, empower them with greater contract choice and more direct access to renewable and low carbon energy. To improve investment conditions for businesses, in particular those pursuing decarbonisation pathways. it proposes measures to counter exposure to short term price spikes through power purchase agreements and more prudential obligations for energy suppliers. It also proposes measures to improve the way variable renewable and low carbon energies are integrated into the short-term market. This includes measures boosting the use of demand response and storage, among other forms of non-fossil flexibility. The proposal also improves and clarifies access to longer term contracts for developers (both State supported such as contracts for difference, and private, such as power purchase agreements) in order to provide secure, stable revenues for renewable and low carbon energy developers and bring down risk and capital costs while avoiding windfall profits in periods of high prices. Whilst the current market design has over many decades delivered an efficient, increasingly integrated market, the energy crisis has highlighted a number of shortcomings relating to: (i) insufficient tools to protect consumers, including businesses, against high short term prices; (ii) the excessive influence of fossil fuel prices on electricity prices and the failure for low cost renewables and low carbon energy to be better reflected in electricity bills; (iii) the impact of extreme price volatility and regulatory interventions on investment; (iv) the lack of sufficient non-fossil flexibility (such as storage or demand response) that could reduce dependence on gas-fired generation; (v) the limited choice of supplier contract types; (vi) the difficulties to directly access renewable energy though energy sharing; and (vii) the need for robust monitoring of the energy market to better protect against market abuse. To protect consumers from volatile prices, the proposal will provide for the right to fixed price contacts as well as dynamic price contracts, the right to multiple contracts and to better and clearer contract information. Consumers will be offered variety of contracts that best fits their circumstances. In this way, consumers, including small businesses, can lock in secure, long-term prices to mitigate the impact of sudden price shocks, and/or they may choose to have dynamic pricing contracts with suppliers if they wish to take advantage of price variability to use electricity when it is cheaper (e.g., to charge electric cars or use heat pumps). Such a combination of both dynamic and fixed pricing allows to keep market incentives for consumers to adjust their electricity demand, while providing more certainty also for those who wish to invest in renewable energy sources (rooftop solar panels for instance) and stability of costs. In addition to the existing protection framework for energy poor and vulnerable consumers, the proposal will also provide access to regulated retail prices for households and SME consumers in the event of a crisis and stabilise the supply industry by requiring that suppliers make more effort to guard against high price spikes by making greater use of forward contracts with generators (locking in future prices) and by requiring Member States to establish a supplier of last resort regime. The proposal will empower consumers by creating the right to share renewable energy directly, without the need to create energy communities. Greater energy sharing (e.g., sharing surplus roof top solar power with a neighbour) can improve the use made of low cost renewable energy and provide greater access to direct use of renewable energy for consumers who might not otherwise have such access. To enhance stability and predictability of the cost of energy, thereby contributing to the competitiveness of the EU economy facing excessive volatile prices, the proposal intends to enhance market access to more stable longer-term contracts and markets. Power purchase agreements (PPAs) - long-term private contracts between a generator (typically renewable or low carbon) and a consumer – can protect against price volatility, but they are currently mostly available only to large energy consumers in very few Member States. A barrier to the growth of this market is the credit risk that a consumer will not always be able to buy the electricity over the whole period. To address this, Member States should ensure that instruments to reduce the financial risks associated to off-taker payment default in the framework of PPAs, including guarantee schemes at market prices, are accessible to companies that face entry barriers to the PPA market and are not in financial difficulty. To further encourage the growth of the market for such agreements, renewable and low carbon energy project developers participating in a public support tender should be allowed to reserve a share of the generation for sale through a PPA. In addition, Member States should endeavour to apply in some of these tenders' evaluation criteria to incentivise the access to the PPA market for customers that face entry barriers. Finally, the obligation on suppliers to hedge appropriately may also boost demand for PPAs (which are a way of locking in future prices). Some forms of public support guarantee the energy producer a minimum price by the government but allow for the producer to nevertheless earn the full market price even when this market price is very high. With the recent high prices much (cheap) publicly supported energy has been receiving these high market prices. To curb this and so stabilise prices, investment support should be structured as “two-way” (two-way contract for difference), which set a minimum price but also a maximum price, so any revenues above the ceiling are paid back. The proposal will apply to new investments for the generation of electricity, which include investments in new power-generating facilities, investments aimed at repowering existing power-generating facilities, investments aimed at extending existing power-generating facilities or at prolonging their lifetime. Moreover, the proposal will require that such money is then channelled to support all electricity consumers in proportion to their consumption to mitigate the effect of high prices. A further means of guarding against volatile prices is to use long term contracts that lock in future prices (“forward contracts”). This market shows low liquidity in many Member States but could be boosted across the EU, so that more suppliers or consumers can guard against excessively volatile prices over longer periods of time. The proposal will create regional reference prices via a hub to increase price transparency and oblige system operators to allow transmission rights longer than a year, so that if a forward contract is between parties across regions or borders, they can ensure transmission of the electricity. Finally, to ensure markets that behave competitively and prices are set transparently, regulators’ ability to monitor energy market integrity and transparency will be enhanced. The third objective is to boost renewable energy investment, in order to ensure that deployment triples, in line with European Green Deal goals. This will be achieved partly by improving the markets for long term contracts. Power purchase agreements and contracts for difference not only provide consumers with stable prices, they also give renewable energy suppliers reliable revenues. This lowers their financial risk and greatly reduces their cost of capital. This creates a virtuous circle where stable revenues lower costs and boost demand for renewable energy. Renewable energy is also a better investment when its ability to produce power is not curtailed due to technical constraints in the system. The more flexible the system is (generation that can rapidly turn on or off, storage that can absorb or put power onto the system, or responsive consumers who can increase or decrease their demand for power) the more stable prices can be and the more renewable energy the system can integrate. For this reason, the proposal requires Member States to assess their needs for power system flexibility, establish objectives to deliver on these needs. Member States can design or redesign capacity mechanisms in order to promote low-carbon flexibility. Moreover, the proposal opens the possibility for Member States to introduce new support schemes for non-fossil flexibility such as demand side response and storage. System operators should also play an enhanced role integrating renewables into the grid, partly by increasing transparency surrounding availability of grid connection capacity. First, this clearer information would enhance renewable energy developers’ ability to develop renewables in areas where the grid is less congested. Second, renewable energy can be more efficiently traded and balanced in the system if trades between market participants can take place closer to “real time”. If offers to supply electricity are made minutes before consumption rather than hours before consumption, the offers from wind and solar power producers are more accurate, more wind and solar power can be consumed and the “imbalance costs” of the system are reduced. Thus, trading deadlines will be brought closer to real time. 
Revised version (Article 8 Trade on day-ahead and intraday markets):
1. NEMOs shall allow market participants to trade energy as close to real time as possible and at least up to the intraday cross-zonal gate closure time. From 1 January 2026, the intraday cross-zonal gate closure time shall not be more than 30 minutes ahead of real time. 1b. The regulatory authority may, at the request of the transmission system operator concerned, grant a further derogation from the requirement laid down in paragraph 1 by up to two-and-a-half years from the date of expiry of the period referred to in paragraph 1a. The transmission system operator concerned shall submit the request to the regulatory authority concerned, to the ENTSO for Electricity and to ACER by 30 June 2028. That request shall include: (a) a new impact assessment, taking into account feedback from market participants and NEMOs, justifying the need for a further derogation, based on risks to the security of supply in the national electricity system, cost-efficiency, the integration of renewable energy, and greenhouse gas emissions; and (b) a revised action plan to shorten the intraday cross-zonal gate closure time to 30 minutes ahead of real time by the date for which extension is requested and no later than the date requested for the derogation. ACER shall issue an opinion about the cross-border impact of a further derogation within six months of receipt of a request for such a derogation. The regulatory authority concerned shall take that opinion into account before deciding upon a request for further derogation. 1c. By 1 December 2027, the Commission shall, after consulting NEMOs, ENTSO for Electricity, ACER and relevant stakeholders, submit a report to the European Parliament and to the Council assessing the impact of the implementation of the decreasing of the cross-zonal gate closure time established pursuant to this Article, the costs and benefits, the feasibility and practical solutions towards further decreasing it in order to allow market participants to trade energy as close to real time as possible. The report shall consider the impact on the electricity system security, the cost-efficiency, the benefits to the integration of renewable energy and to the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions. 2. NEMOs shall provide market participants with the opportunity to trade in energy in time intervals which are at least as short as the imbalance settlement period for both day-ahead and intraday markets. 3. NEMOs shall provide products for trading in day-ahead and intraday markets which are sufficiently small in size, with minimum bid sizes of 100 kW or less, to allow for the effective participation of demand response, energy storage and small-scale renewables including direct participation by customers, as well as through aggregation. 4. By 1 January 2021, the imbalance settlement period shall be 15 minutes in all scheduling areas, unless regulatory authorities have granted a derogation or an exemption. Derogations may be granted only until 31 December 2024. From 1 January 2025, the imbalance settlement period shall not exceed 30 minutes where an exemption has been granted by all the regulatory authorities within a synchronous area.
Article 9 Forward markets
1. In accordance with Regulation (EU) 2016/1719, transmission system operators shall issue long-term transmission rights or have equivalent measures in place to allow for market participants, including owners of power-generating facilities using renewable energy sources, to hedge price risks across bidding zone borders, unless an assessment of the forward market on the bidding zone borders performed by the competent regulatory authorities shows that there are sufficient hedging opportunities in the concerned bidding zones. 2. Long-term transmission rights shall be allocated in a transparent, market based and non-discriminatory manner through a single allocation platform. 3. Subject to compliance with Union competition law, market operators shall be free to develop forward hedging products, including long-term forward hedging products, to provide market participants, including owners of power-generating facilities using renewable energy sources, with appropriate possibilities for hedging financial risks against price fluctuations. Member States shall not require that such hedging activity be limited to trades within a Member State or bidding zone.
Amendment rationale: CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL Reasons for and objectives of the proposal 1.1. Policy context Energy prices significantly increased throughout 2021 and 2022. This resulted from reductions in gas supply, particularly after the start of Russia’s war against Ukraine and the weaponisation of energy as well as from domestic shortfalls in hydropower and nuclear power. The price rises also resulted from increased energy demand, as the global economy picked up after the COVID-19 pandemic. These price rises were rapidly felt by households, industry and businesses across the EU, and governments immediately took steps to mitigate them. At the European level, the EU swiftly provided an energy prices toolbox 1 with measures to address high prices , in particular for the most vulnerable consumers (including income support, tax breaks, gas saving and storage measures), as well as the REPowerEU plan 2 with further measures and funding to boost energy efficiency and renewable energy in order to reduce dependence on Russian fossil fuels. This was followed by the creation of a temporary State Aid regime 3 to allow certain measures to soften the impact of high prices, a strong gas storage regime 4 , effective demand reduction measures for gas 5 and electricity 6 , faster renewable energy and grid permitting processes 7 , and price limiting regimes to avoid windfall profits in both the gas and electricity markets 8 . These short-term measures helped Member States to deal with the immediate fall-out of the energy crisis. However, the crisis also showed how exposed consumers and industries are and our lack of resilience to energy price spikes. The impact of fossil fuel-based generation on setting electricity prices was seen as excessive by businesses and citizens, while Member States’ ability to cushion short term prices with longer term contracts appeared inadequate. For this reason, the European Commission President announced in the 2022 State of the Union Address 9 the need for a fundamental reform of the electricity market design. Whilst the EU’s internal energy market delivers huge gains and growth across Europe, the recent energy crisis has highlighted that the energy market design’s short-term focus can distract from broader, longer-term goals. The reflection of short-term prices in consumers bills led to price shocks where energy bills of many consumers tripled or quadrupled, even as the costs of wind and solar power were declining; the sudden exposure to volatile and high prices triggered some supplier bankruptcies; many industrial enterprises in energy intensive sectors were obliged to shut down. Therefore, the proposal includes a set of measures aimed to create a buffer between short-term markets and electricity bills paid by consumers, in particular by way of incentivizing longer term contracting, to improve the functioning of short-term markets to better integrate renewables and enhance the role of flexibility and to empower and protect consumers. The recent price volatility has also highlighted the lack of flexibility in the electricity grid, with prices set too often by gas-fired generation and with a general lack of low carbon flexible supply, demand response and energy storage. As more wind and solar power enter the system, low-carbon flexible technologies will be needed to balance the variable supply with variable demand. In parallel with this proposal, the Commission is making recommendations for the advancement of storage innovation, technologies, and capacities. More broadly, the sensitivity of the electricity price to fossil fuel prices highlighted the need to speed up the deployment of renewables together with the flexibility of the power system to displace fossil fuels. REPowerEU provides such a boost to renewable energy and with it, a boost to economic growth and quality jobs creation . It builds on the European Green Deal’s drive to improve European competitiveness through innovation and the transition to a net zero economy and is closely aligned with the Commission’s Green Deal Industrial Plan. To facilitate the investments needed in the face of recent price volatility, uncoordinated regulatory interventions and grid and regulatory barriers to entry, fundamental reform is needed. Finally, in the Report on the final outcome of the Conference on the Future of Europe, citizens asked the EU institutions to take measures to “Enhance European energy security, and achieve the EU’s energy independence” and to ‘Reduce dependency of EU from foreign actors in economically strategic sectors’, including energy 10 1.2. Objectives of the proposal The proposal is addressing consumer, industry and investors’ concerns over exposure to volatile short-term prices, driven by high prices of fossil fuels. It will optimize the electricity market design by complementing the short-term markets with a greater role for longer-term instruments, allowing consumers to benefit from more fixed priced contracts, and facilitating investments in clean technologies. Ultimately, it will mean that less fossil fuel generation is needed and will lead to lower prices for consumers during future fossil fuel crisis due to the low operational costs of renewable and low carbon energy. The proposal is putting forward measures to protect consumers from such volatility, empower them with greater contract choice and more direct access to renewable and low carbon energy. To improve investment conditions for businesses, in particular those pursuing decarbonisation pathways. it proposes measures to counter exposure to short term price spikes through power purchase agreements and more prudential obligations for energy suppliers. It also proposes measures to improve the way variable renewable and low carbon energies are integrated into the short-term market. This includes measures boosting the use of demand response and storage, among other forms of non-fossil flexibility. The proposal also improves and clarifies access to longer term contracts for developers (both State supported such as contracts for difference, and private, such as power purchase agreements) in order to provide secure, stable revenues for renewable and low carbon energy developers and bring down risk and capital costs while avoiding windfall profits in periods of high prices. Whilst the current market design has over many decades delivered an efficient, increasingly integrated market, the energy crisis has highlighted a number of shortcomings relating to: (i) insufficient tools to protect consumers, including businesses, against high short term prices; (ii) the excessive influence of fossil fuel prices on electricity prices and the failure for low cost renewables and low carbon energy to be better reflected in electricity bills; (iii) the impact of extreme price volatility and regulatory interventions on investment; (iv) the lack of sufficient non-fossil flexibility (such as storage or demand response) that could reduce dependence on gas-fired generation; (v) the limited choice of supplier contract types; (vi) the difficulties to directly access renewable energy though energy sharing; and (vii) the need for robust monitoring of the energy market to better protect against market abuse. To protect consumers from volatile prices, the proposal will provide for the right to fixed price contacts as well as dynamic price contracts, the right to multiple contracts and to better and clearer contract information. Consumers will be offered variety of contracts that best fits their circumstances. In this way, consumers, including small businesses, can lock in secure, long-term prices to mitigate the impact of sudden price shocks, and/or they may choose to have dynamic pricing contracts with suppliers if they wish to take advantage of price variability to use electricity when it is cheaper (e.g., to charge electric cars or use heat pumps). Such a combination of both dynamic and fixed pricing allows to keep market incentives for consumers to adjust their electricity demand, while providing more certainty also for those who wish to invest in renewable energy sources (rooftop solar panels for instance) and stability of costs. In addition to the existing protection framework for energy poor and vulnerable consumers, the proposal will also provide access to regulated retail prices for households and SME consumers in the event of a crisis and stabilise the supply industry by requiring that suppliers make more effort to guard against high price spikes by making greater use of forward contracts with generators (locking in future prices) and by requiring Member States to establish a supplier of last resort regime. The proposal will empower consumers by creating the right to share renewable energy directly, without the need to create energy communities. Greater energy sharing (e.g., sharing surplus roof top solar power with a neighbour) can improve the use made of low cost renewable energy and provide greater access to direct use of renewable energy for consumers who might not otherwise have such access. To enhance stability and predictability of the cost of energy, thereby contributing to the competitiveness of the EU economy facing excessive volatile prices, the proposal intends to enhance market access to more stable longer-term contracts and markets. Power purchase agreements (PPAs) - long-term private contracts between a generator (typically renewable or low carbon) and a consumer – can protect against price volatility, but they are currently mostly available only to large energy consumers in very few Member States. A barrier to the growth of this market is the credit risk that a consumer will not always be able to buy the electricity over the whole period. To address this, Member States should ensure that instruments to reduce the financial risks associated to off-taker payment default in the framework of PPAs, including guarantee schemes at market prices, are accessible to companies that face entry barriers to the PPA market and are not in financial difficulty. To further encourage the growth of the market for such agreements, renewable and low carbon energy project developers participating in a public support tender should be allowed to reserve a share of the generation for sale through a PPA. In addition, Member States should endeavour to apply in some of these tenders' evaluation criteria to incentivise the access to the PPA market for customers that face entry barriers. Finally, the obligation on suppliers to hedge appropriately may also boost demand for PPAs (which are a way of locking in future prices). Some forms of public support guarantee the energy producer a minimum price by the government but allow for the producer to nevertheless earn the full market price even when this market price is very high. With the recent high prices much (cheap) publicly supported energy has been receiving these high market prices. To curb this and so stabilise prices, investment support should be structured as “two-way” (two-way contract for difference), which set a minimum price but also a maximum price, so any revenues above the ceiling are paid back. The proposal will apply to new investments for the generation of electricity, which include investments in new power-generating facilities, investments aimed at repowering existing power-generating facilities, investments aimed at extending existing power-generating facilities or at prolonging their lifetime. Moreover, the proposal will require that such money is then channelled to support all electricity consumers in proportion to their consumption to mitigate the effect of high prices. A further means of guarding against volatile prices is to use long term contracts that lock in future prices (“forward contracts”). This market shows low liquidity in many Member States but could be boosted across the EU, so that more suppliers or consumers can guard against excessively volatile prices over longer periods of time. The proposal will create regional reference prices via a hub to increase price transparency and oblige system operators to allow transmission rights longer than a year, so that if a forward contract is between parties across regions or borders, they can ensure transmission of the electricity. Finally, to ensure markets that behave competitively and prices are set transparently, regulators’ ability to monitor energy market integrity and transparency will be enhanced. The third objective is to boost renewable energy investment, in order to ensure that deployment triples, in line with European Green Deal goals. This will be achieved partly by improving the markets for long term contracts. Power purchase agreements and contracts for difference not only provide consumers with stable prices, they also give renewable energy suppliers reliable revenues. This lowers their financial risk and greatly reduces their cost of capital. This creates a virtuous circle where stable revenues lower costs and boost demand for renewable energy. Renewable energy is also a better investment when its ability to produce power is not curtailed due to technical constraints in the system. The more flexible the system is (generation that can rapidly turn on or off, storage that can absorb or put power onto the system, or responsive consumers who can increase or decrease their demand for power) the more stable prices can be and the more renewable energy the system can integrate. For this reason, the proposal requires Member States to assess their needs for power system flexibility, establish objectives to deliver on these needs. Member States can design or redesign capacity mechanisms in order to promote low-carbon flexibility. Moreover, the proposal opens the possibility for Member States to introduce new support schemes for non-fossil flexibility such as demand side response and storage. System operators should also play an enhanced role integrating renewables into the grid, partly by increasing transparency surrounding availability of grid connection capacity. First, this clearer information would enhance renewable energy developers’ ability to develop renewables in areas where the grid is less congested. Second, renewable energy can be more efficiently traded and balanced in the system if trades between market participants can take place closer to “real time”. If offers to supply electricity are made minutes before consumption rather than hours before consumption, the offers from wind and solar power producers are more accurate, more wind and solar power can be consumed and the “imbalance costs” of the system are reduced. Thus, trading deadlines will be brought closer to real time. 
Revised version (Article 9 Forward markets):
1. In accordance with Regulation (EU) 2016/1719, transmission system operators shall issue long-term transmission rights or have equivalent measures in place to allow market participants, including owners of power-generating facilities using renewable energy, to hedge price risks, unless an assessment of the forward market on the bidding zone borders performed by the competent regulatory authorities shows that there are sufficient hedging opportunities in the bidding zones concerned. 2. Long-term transmission rights shall be allocated, on a regular basis, in a transparent, market based and non-discriminatory manner through a single allocation platform. The frequency of allocation and the maturities of the long-term cross-zonal capacity shall support the efficient functioning of the Union’s forward markets. 3. The design of the Union’s forward markets shall comprise the necessary tools to improve the ability of market participants to hedge price risks in the internal electricity market. 6. On the basis of the outcome of the impact assessment referred to in paragraph 4 of this Article, the Commission shall, by 17 July 2026, adopt an implementing act to further specify measures and tools to achieve the objectives referred to in in paragraph 3 of this Article and the precise features of those measures and tools. That implementing act shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to Article 67(2). 7. The single allocation platform established in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2016/1719 shall act as an entity offering allocation and facilitating the trading of long-term transmission rights on behalf of transmission system operators. It shall have a legal form as referred to in Annex II to Directive (EU) 2017/1132 of the European Parliament and of the Council ( 5 ). 8. Where a competent regulatory authority considers that there are insufficient hedging opportunities available for market participants, it may, after consulting the competent authorities designated pursuant to Article 67 of Directive 2014/65/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council ( 6 ) where the forward markets concern financial instruments as defined in Article 4(1), point (15), of that Directive, require power exchanges or transmission system operators to implement additional measures, such as market-making activities, to improve the liquidity of the forward markets. 9. Subject to compliance with Union competition law and with Regulations (EU) No 648/2012 ( 7 ) and (EU) No 600/2014 ( 8 ) of the European Parliament and of the Council and Directive 2014/65/EU, market operators may develop forward hedging products, including long-term forward hedging products, to provide market participants, including owners of power-generating facilities using renewable energy sources, with appropriate possibilities for hedging financial risks against price fluctuations. Member States shall not require that such hedging activity may be limited to trades within a Member State or bidding zone.
Article 10 Technical bidding limits
1. There shall be neither a maximum nor a minimum limit to the wholesale electricity price. This provision shall apply, inter alia, to bidding and clearing in all timeframes and shall include balancing energy and imbalance prices, without prejudice to the technical price limits which may be applied in the balancing timeframe and in the day-ahead and intraday timeframes in accordance with paragraph 2. 2. NEMOs may apply harmonised limits on maximum and minimum clearing prices for day-ahead and intraday timeframes. Those limits shall be sufficiently high so as not to unnecessarily restrict trade, shall be harmonised for the internal market and shall take into account the maximum value of lost load. NEMOs shall implement a transparent mechanism to adjust automatically the technical bidding limits in due time in the event that the set limits are expected to be reached. The adjusted higher limits shall remain applicable until further increases under that mechanism are required. 3. Transmission system operators shall not take any measures for the purpose of changing wholesale prices. 4. Regulatory authorities or, where a Member State has designated another competent authority for that purpose, such designated competent authorities, shall identify policies and measures applied within their territory that could contribute to indirectly restricting wholesale price formation, including limiting bids relating to the activation of balancing energy, capacity mechanisms, measures by the transmission system operators, measures intended to challenge market outcomes, or to prevent the abuse of dominant positions or inefficiently defined bidding zones. 5. Where a regulatory authority or designated competent authority has identified a policy or measure which could serve to restrict wholesale price formation it shall take all appropriate actions to eliminate or, if not possible, to mitigate the impact of that policy or measure on bidding behaviour. Member States shall provide a report to the Commission by 5 January 2020 detailing the measures and actions they have taken or intend to take.
Article 11 Value of lost load
1. By 5 July 2020 where required for the purpose of setting a reliability standard in accordance with Article 25 regulatory authorities or, where a Member State has designated another competent authority for that purpose, such designated competent authorities shall determine a single estimate of the value of lost load for their territory. That estimate shall be made publically available. Regulatory authorities or other designated competent authorities may determine different estimates per bidding zone if they have more than one bidding zone in their territory. Where a bidding zone consists of territories of more than one Member State, the concerned regulatory authorities or other designated competent authorities shall determine a single estimate of the value of lost load for that bidding zone. In determining the single estimate of the value of lost load, regulatory authorities or other designated competent authorities shall apply the methodology referred to in Article 23(6). 2. Regulatory authorities and designated competent authorities shall update their estimate of the value of lost load at least every five years, or earlier where they observe a significant change.
Article 12 Dispatching of generation and demand response
1. The dispatching of power-generating facilities and demand response shall be non-discriminatory, transparent and, unless otherwise provided under paragraphs 2 to 6, market based. 2. Without prejudice to Articles 107, 108 and 109 TFEU, Member States shall ensure that when dispatching electricity generating installations, system operators shall give priority to generating installations using renewable energy sources to the extent permitted by the secure operation of the national electricity system, based on transparent and non-discriminatory criteria and where such power-generating facilities are either: (a) power-generating facilities that use renewable energy sources and have an installed electricity capacity of less than 400 kW; or (b) demonstration projects for innovative technologies, subject to approval by the regulatory authority, provided that such priority is limited to the time and extent necessary for achieving the demonstration purposes. Any derogation shall avoid retroactive changes that affect generating installations already benefiting from priority dispatch, notwithstanding any agreement between a Member State and the operator of a generating installation on a voluntary basis. Without prejudice to Articles 107, 108 and 109 TFEU, Member States may provide incentives to installations eligible for priority dispatch to voluntarily give up priority dispatch. 4. Without prejudice to Articles 107, 108 and 109 TFEU, Member States may provide for priority dispatch for electricity generated in power-generating facilities using high-efficiency cogeneration with an installed electricity capacity of less than 400 kW. 5. For power-generating facilities commissioned as from 1 January 2026, point (a) of paragraph 2 shall apply only to power-generating facilities that use renewable energy sources and have an installed electricity capacity of less than 200 kW. 6. Without prejudice to contracts concluded before 4 July 2019, power-generating facilities that use renewable energy sources or high-efficiency cogeneration and were commissioned before 4 July 2019 and, when commissioned, were subject to priority dispatch under Article 15(5) of Directive 2012/27/EU or Article 16(2) of Directive 2009/28/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council ( 5 ) shall continue to benefit from priority dispatch. Priority dispatch shall no longer apply to such power-generating facilities from the date on which the power-generating facility becomes subject to significant modifications, which shall be deemed to be the case at least where a new connection agreement is required or where the generation capacity of the power-generating facility is increased. 7. Priority dispatch shall not endanger the secure operation of the electricity system, shall not be used as a justification for curtailment of cross-zonal capacities beyond what is provided for in Article 16 and shall be based on transparent and non-discriminatory criteria.
Article 13 Redispatching
1. The redispatching of generation and redispatching of demand response shall be based on objective, transparent and non-discriminatory criteria. It shall be open to all generation technologies, all energy storage and all demand response, including those located in other Member States unless technically not feasible. 2. The resources that are redispatched shall be selected from among generating facilities, energy storage or demand response using market-based mechanisms and shall be financially compensated. Balancing energy bids used for redispatching shall not set the balancing energy price. 7. Where non-market based redispatching is used, it shall be subject to financial compensation by the system operator requesting the redispatching to the operator of the redispatched generation, energy storage or demand response facility except in the case of producers that have accepted a connection agreement under which there is no guarantee of firm delivery of energy. Such financial compensation shall be at least equal to the higher of the following elements or a combination of both if applying only the higher would lead to an unjustifiably low or an unjustifiably high compensation: (a) additional operating cost caused by the redispatching, such as additional fuel costs in the case of upward redispatching, or backup heat provision in the case of downward redispatching of power-generating facilities using high-efficiency cogeneration; (b) net revenues from the sale of electricity on the day-ahead market that the power-generating, energy storage or demand response facility would have generated without the redispatching request; where financial support is granted to power-generating, energy storage or demand response facilities based on the electricity volume generated or consumed, financial support that would have been received without the redispatching request shall be deemed to be part of the net revenues.
Article 14 Bidding zone review
1. Member States shall take all appropriate measures to address congestions. Bidding zone borders shall be based on long-term, structural congestions in the transmission network. Bidding zones shall not contain such structural congestions unless they have no impact on neighbouring bidding zones, or, as a temporary exemption, their impact on neighbouring bidding zones is mitigated through the use of remedial actions and those structural congestions do not lead to reductions of cross-zonal trading capacity in accordance with the requirements of Article 16. The configuration of bidding zones in the Union shall be designed in such a way as to maximise economic efficiency and to maximise cross-zonal trading opportunities in accordance with Article 16, while maintaining security of supply. 2. Every three years, the ENTSO for Electricity shall report on structural congestions and other major physical congestions between and within bidding zones, including the location and frequency of such congestions, in accordance with the capacity allocation and congestion management guideline adopted on the basis of Article 18(5) of Regulation (EC) No 714/2009. That report shall contain an assessment of whether the cross-zonal trade capacity reached the linear trajectory pursuant to Article 15 or the minimum capacity pursuant to Article 16 of this Regulation. 3. In order to ensure an optimal configuration of bidding zones, a bidding zone review shall be carried out. That review shall identify all structural congestions and shall include an analysis of different configurations of bidding zones in a coordinated manner with the involvement of affected stakeholders from all relevant Member States, in accordance with the capacity allocation and congestion management guideline adopted on the basis of Article 18(5) of Regulation (EC) No 714/2009. Current bidding zones shall be assessed on the basis of their ability to create a reliable market environment, including for flexible generation and load capacity, which is crucial to avoiding grid bottlenecks, balancing electricity demand and supply, securing the long-term security of investments in network infrastructure. 4. For the purposes of this Article and of Article 15 of this Regulation, relevant Member States, transmission system operators or regulatory authorities are those Member States, transmission system operators or regulatory authorities participating in the review of the bidding zone configuration and also to those in the same capacity calculation region pursuant to the capacity allocation and congestion management guideline adopted on the basis of Article 18(5) of Regulation (EC) No 714/2009. 5. By 5 October 2019 all relevant transmission system operators shall submit a proposal for the methodology and assumptions that are to be used in the bidding zone review process and for the alternative bidding zone configurations to be considered to the relevant regulatory authorities for approval. The relevant regulatory authorities shall take a unanimous decision on the proposal within 3 months of submission of the proposal. Where the regulatory authorities are unable to reach a unanimous decision on the proposal within that time frame, ACER shall, within an additional three months, decide on the methodology and assumptions and the alternative bidding zone configurations to be considered. The methodology shall be based on structural congestions which are not expected to be overcome within the following three years, taking due account of tangible progress on infrastructure development projects that are expected to be realised within the following three years. 6. On the basis of the methodology and assumptions approved pursuant to paragraph 5, the transmission system operators participating in the bidding zone review shall submit a joint proposal to the relevant Member States or their designated competent authorities to amend or maintain the bidding zone configuration no later than 12 months after approval of the methodology and assumptions pursuant to paragraph 5. Other Member States, Energy Community Contracting Parties or other third countries sharing the same synchronous area with any relevant Member State may submit comments. 7. Where structural congestion has been identified in the report pursuant to paragraph 2 of this Article or in the bidding zone review pursuant to this Article or by one or more transmission system operators in their control areas in a report approved by the competent regulatory authority, the Member State with identified structural congestion shall, in cooperation with its transmission system operators, decide, within six months of receipt of the report, either to establish national or multinational action plans pursuant to Article 15, or to review and amend its bidding zone configuration. Those decisions shall be immediately notified to the Commission and to ACER. 8. For those Member States that have opted to amend the bidding zone configuration pursuant to paragraph 7, the relevant Member States shall reach a unanimous decision within six months of the notification referred to in paragraph 7. Other Member States may submit comments to the relevant Member States, who should take account of those comments when reaching their decision. The decision shall be reasoned and shall be notified to the Commission and ACER. In the event that the relevant Member States fail to reach a unanimous decision within those six months, they shall immediately notify the Commission thereof. As a measure of last resort, the Commission after consulting ACER shall adopt a decision whether to amend or maintain the bidding zone configuration in and between those Member States by six months after receipt of such a notification. 9. Member States and the Commission shall consult relevant stakeholders before adopting a decision under this Article. 10. Any decision adopted under this Article shall specify the date of implementation of any changes. That implementation date shall balance the need for expeditiousness with practical considerations, including forward trade of electricity. The decision may establish appropriate transitional arrangements. 11. Where further bidding zone reviews are launched under the capacity allocation and congestion management guideline adopted on the basis of Article 18(5) of Regulation (EC) No 714/2009, this Article shall apply.
Article 15 Action plans
1. Following the adoption of a decision pursuant to Article 14(7), the Member State with identified structural congestion shall develop an action plan in cooperation with its regulatory authority. That action plan shall contain a concrete timetable for adopting measures to reduce the structural congestions identified within four years of the adoption of the decision pursuant to Article 14(7). 2. Irrespective of the concrete progress of the action plan, Member States shall ensure that without prejudice to derogations granted under Article 16(9) or deviations under Article 16(3), the cross-zonal trade capacity is increased on an annual basis until the minimum capacity provided for in Article 16(8) is reached. That minimum capacity shall be reached by 31 December 2025. Those annual increases shall be achieved by means of a linear trajectory. The starting point of that trajectory shall be either the capacity allocated at the border or on a critical network element in the year before adoption of the action plan or the average during the three years before adoption of the action plan, whichever is higher. Member States shall ensure that, during the implementation of their action plans the capacity made available for cross-zonal trade to be compliant with Article 16(8) is at least equal to the values of the linear trajectory, including by use of remedial actions in the capacity calculation region. 3. The cost of the remedial actions necessary to achieve the linear trajectory referred to in paragraph 2 or make available cross-zonal capacity at the borders or on critical network elements concerned by the action plan shall be borne by the Member State or Member States implementing the action plan. 4. On an annual basis, during the implementation of the action plan and within six months of its expiry, the relevant transmission system operators shall assess for the previous 12 months whether the available cross-border capacity has reached the linear trajectory or, from 1 January 2026, the minimum capacities provided for in Article 16(8) have been achieved. They shall submit their assessments to ACER and to the relevant regulatory authorities. Before drafting the report, each transmission system operator shall submit its contribution to the report, including all the relevant data, to its regulatory authority for approval. 5. For those Member States for which the assessments referred to in paragraph 4 demonstrate that a transmission system operator has not complied with the linear trajectory, the relevant Member States shall, within six months of receipt of the assessment report referred to in paragraph 4, decide unanimously whether to amend or maintain the bidding zone configuration within and between those Member States. In their decision, the relevant Member States should take account of any comments submitted by other Member States. The relevant Member States' decision shall be substantiated and shall be notified to the Commission and to ACER. The relevant Member States shall notify the Commission immediately if they fail to reach a unanimous decision within the timeframe laid down. Within six months of receipt of such notification, the Commission, as a last resort and after consulting ACER and the relevant stakeholders shall adopt a decision whether to amend or maintain the bidding zone configuration in and between those Member States. 6. Six months before the expiry of the action plan, the Member State with identified structural congestion shall decide whether to address remaining congestion by amending its bidding zone or whether to address remaining internal congestion with remedial actions for which it shall cover the costs. 7. Where no action plan is established within six months of identification of structural congestion pursuant to Article 14(7), the relevant transmission system operators shall, within 12 months of identification of such structural congestion, assess whether the available cross-border capacity has reached the minimum capacities provided for in Article 16(8) during the previous 12 months and shall submit an assessment report to the relevant regulatory authorities and to ACER. Before drafting the report, each transmission system operator shall send its contribution to the report, including all relevant data, to its national regulatory authority for approval. Where the assessment demonstrates that a transmission system operator has not complied with the minimum capacity, the decision-making process laid down in paragraph 5 of this Article shall apply.
Article 16 General principles of capacity allocation and congestion management
1. Network congestion problems shall be addressed with non-discriminatory market-based solutions which give efficient economic signals to the market participants and transmission system operators involved. Network congestion problems shall be solved by means of non-transaction-based methods, namely methods that do not involve a selection between the contracts of individual market participants. When taking operational measures to ensure that its transmission system remains in the normal state, the transmission system operator shall take into account the effect of those measures on neighbouring control areas and coordinate such measures with other affected transmission system operators as provided for in Regulation (EU) 2015/1222. 2. Transaction curtailment procedures shall be used only in emergency situations, namely where the transmission system operator must act in an expeditious manner and redispatching or countertrading is not possible. Any such procedure shall be applied in a non-discriminatory manner. Except in cases of force majeure, market participants that have been allocated capacity shall be compensated for any such curtailment. 3. Regional coordination centres shall calculate cross-zonal capacities respecting operational security limits using data from transmission system operators including data on the technical availability of remedial actions, not including load shedding. Where regional coordination centres conclude that those available remedial actions in the capacity calculation region or between capacity calculation regions are not sufficient to reach the linear trajectory pursuant to Article 15(2) or the minimum capacities provided for in paragraph 8 of this Article while respecting operational security limits, they may, as a measure of last resort, set out coordinated actions reducing the cross-zonal capacities accordingly. Transmission system operators may deviate from coordinated actions in respect of coordinated capacity calculation and coordinated security analysis only in accordance with Article 42(2). By 3 months after the entry into operation of the regional coordination centres pursuant to Article 35(2) of this Regulation and every three months thereafter, the regional coordination centres shall submit a report to the relevant regulatory authorities and to ACER on any reduction of capacity or deviation from coordinated actions pursuant to the second subparagraph and shall assess the incidences and make recommendations, if necessary, on how to avoid such deviations in the future. If ACER concludes that the prerequisites for a deviation pursuant to this paragraph are not fulfilled or are of a structural nature, ACER shall submit an opinion to the relevant regulatory authorities and to the Commission. The competent regulatory authorities shall take appropriate action against transmission system operators or regional coordination centres pursuant to Article 59 or 62 of Directive (EU) 2019/944 if the prerequisites for a deviation pursuant to this paragraph were not fulfilled. Deviations of a structural nature shall be addressed in an action plan referred to in Article 14(7) or in an update of an existing action plan. 4. The maximum level of capacity of the interconnections and the transmission networks affected by cross-border capacity shall be made available to market participants complying with the safety standards of secure network operation. Counter-trading and redispatch, including cross-border redispatch, shall be used to maximise available capacities to reach the minimum capacity provided for in paragraph 8. A coordinated and non-discriminatory process for cross-border remedial actions shall be applied to enable such maximisation, following the implementation of a redispatching and counter-trading cost-sharing methodology. 5. Capacity shall be allocated by means of explicit capacity auctions or implicit auctions including both capacity and energy. Both methods may coexist on the same interconnection. For intraday trade, continuous trading, which may be complemented by auctions, shall be used. 6. In the case of congestion, the valid highest value bids for network capacity, whether implicit or explicit, offering the highest value for the scarce transmission capacity in a given timeframe, shall be successful. Other than in the case of new interconnectors which benefit from an exemption under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 1228/2003, Article 17 of Regulation (EC) No 714/2009 or Article 63 of this Regulation, establishing reserve prices in capacity-allocation methods shall be prohibited. 7. Capacity shall be freely tradable on a secondary basis, provided that the transmission system operator is informed sufficiently in advance. Where a transmission system operator refuses any secondary trade (transaction), this shall be clearly and transparently communicated and explained to all the market participants by that transmission system operator and notified to the regulatory authority. The total amount of 30 % can be used for the reliability margins, loop flows and internal flows on each critical network element. 9. At the request of the transmission system operators in a capacity calculation region, the relevant regulatory authorities may grant a derogation from paragraph 8 on foreseeable grounds where necessary for maintaining operational security. Such derogations, which shall not relate to the curtailment of capacities already allocated pursuant to paragraph 2, shall be granted for no more than one-year at a time, or, provided that the extent of the derogation decreases significantly after the first year, up to a maximum of two years. The extent of such derogations shall be strictly limited to what is necessary to maintain operational security and they shall avoid discrimination between internal and cross-zonal exchanges. Before granting a derogation, the relevant regulatory authority shall consult the regulatory authorities of other Member States forming part of the affected capacity calculation regions. Where a regulatory authority disagrees with the proposed derogation, ACER shall decide whether it should be granted pursuant to point (a) of Article 6(10) of Regulation (EU) 2019/942. The justification and reasons for the derogation shall be published. Where a derogation is granted, the relevant transmission system operators shall develop and publish a methodology and projects that shall provide a long-term solution to the issue that the derogation seeks to address. The derogation shall expire when the time limit for the derogation is reached or when the solution is applied, whichever is earlier. 10. Market participants shall inform the transmission system operators concerned within a reasonable period in advance of the relevant operational period whether they intend to use allocated capacity. Any allocated capacity that is not going to be used shall be made available again to the market, in an open, transparent and non-discriminatory manner. 11. As far as technically possible, transmission system operators shall net the capacity requirements of any power flows in opposite directions over the congested interconnection line in order to use that line to its maximum capacity. Having full regard to network security, transactions that relieve the congestion shall not be refused. 12. The financial consequences of a failure to honour obligations associated with the allocation of capacity shall be attributed to the transmission system operators or NEMOs who are responsible for such a failure. Where market participants fail to use the capacity that they have committed to use, or, in the case of explicitly auctioned capacity, fail to trade capacity on a secondary basis or give the capacity back in due time, those market participants shall lose the rights to such capacity and shall pay a cost-reflective charge. Any cost-reflective charges for the failure to use capacity shall be justified and proportionate. If a transmission system operator does not fulfil its obligation of providing firm transmission capacity, it shall be liable to compensate the market participant for the loss of capacity rights. Consequential losses shall not be taken into account for that purpose. The key concepts and methods for the determination of liabilities that accrue upon failure to honour obligations shall be set out in advance in respect of the financial consequences, and shall be subject to review by the relevant regulatory authority. 13. When allocating costs of remedial actions between transmission system operators, regulatory authorities shall analyse to what extent flows resulting from transactions internal to bidding zones contribute to the congestion between two bidding zones observed, and allocate the costs based on the contribution to the congestion to the transmission system operators of the bidding zones creating such flows except for costs induced by flows resulting from transactions internal to bidding zones that are below the level that could be expected without structural congestion in a bidding zone. That level shall be jointly analysed and defined by all transmission system operators in a capacity calculation region for each individual bidding zone border, and shall be subject to the approval of all regulatory authorities in the capacity calculation region.
Article 17 Allocation of cross-zonal capacity across timeframes
1. Transmission system operators shall recalculate available cross-zonal capacity at least after day-ahead gate closure times and after intraday cross-zonal gate closure times. Transmission system operators shall allocate the available cross-zonal capacity plus any remaining cross-zonal capacity not previously allocated and any cross-zonal capacity released by physical transmission right holders from previous allocations in the following cross-zonal capacity allocation process. 3. Where cross-zonal capacity is available after the intraday cross-zonal gate closure time, transmission system operators shall use the cross-zonal capacity for the exchange of balancing energy or for the operation of the imbalance netting process. 4. Where cross-zonal capacity is allocated for the exchange of balancing capacity or sharing of reserves pursuant to Article 6(8) of this Regulation, transmission system operators shall use the methodologies developed in the guideline on electricity balancing adopted on the basis of Article 6(11) of Regulation (EC) No 714/2009. 5. Transmission system operators shall not increase the reliability margin calculated pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2015/1222 due to the exchange of balancing capacity or sharing of reserves.
Article 18 Charges for access to networks, use of networks and reinforcement
1. Charges applied by network operators for access to networks, including charges for connection to the networks, charges for use of networks, and, where applicable, charges for related network reinforcements, shall be cost-reflective, transparent, take into account the need for network security and flexibility and reflect actual costs incurred insofar as they correspond to those of an efficient and structurally comparable network operator and are applied in a non-discriminatory manner. Those charges shall not include unrelated costs supporting unrelated policy objectives. Without prejudice to Article 15(1) and (6) of Directive 2012/27/EU and the criteria in Annex XI to that Directive the method used to determine the network charges shall neutrally support overall system efficiency over the long run through price signals to customers and producers and in particular be applied in a way which does not discriminate positively or negatively between production connected at the distribution level and production connected at the transmission level. The network charges shall not discriminate either positively or negatively against energy storage or aggregation and shall not create disincentives for self-generation, self-consumption or for participation in demand response. Without prejudice to paragraph 3 of this Article, those charges shall not be distance-related. 2. Tariff methodologies shall reflect the fixed costs of transmission system operators and distribution system operators and shall provide appropriate incentives to transmission system operators and distribution system operators over both the short and long run, in order to increase efficiencies, including energy efficiency, to foster market integration and security of supply, to support efficient investments, to support related research activities, and to facilitate innovation in interest of consumers in areas such as digitalisation, flexibility services and interconnection. 3. Where appropriate, the level of the tariffs applied to producers or final customers, or both shall provide locational signals at Union level, and take into account the amount of network losses and congestion caused, and investment costs for infrastructure. 4. When setting the charges for network access, the following shall be taken into account: (a) payments and receipts resulting from the inter-transmission system operator compensation mechanism; (b) actual payments made and received as well as payments expected for future periods, estimated on the basis of previous periods. 5. Setting the charges for network access under this Article shall be without prejudice to charges resulting from congestion management referred to in Article 16. 6. There shall be no specific network charge on individual transactions for cross-zonal trading of electricity. 7. Distribution tariffs shall be cost-reflective taking into account the use of the distribution network by system users including active customers. Distribution tariffs may contain network connection capacity elements and may be differentiated based on system users' consumption or generation profiles. Where Member States have implemented the deployment of smart metering systems, regulatory authorities shall consider time-differentiated network tariffs when fixing or approving transmission tariffs and distribution tariffs or their methodologies in accordance with Article 59 of (EU) 2019/944 and, where appropriate, time-differentiated network tariffs may be introduced to reflect the use of the network, in a transparent, cost efficient and foreseeable way for the final customer. 8. Distribution tariff methodologies shall provide incentives to distribution system operators for the most cost-efficient operation and development of their networks including through the procurement of services. For that purpose regulatory authorities shall recognise relevant costs as eligible, shall include those costs in distribution tariffs, and may introduce performance targets in order to provide incentives to distribution system operators to increase efficiencies in their networks, including through energy efficiency, flexibility and the development of smart grids and intelligent metering systems. ACER shall update the best practice report at least once every two years. 10. Regulatory authorities shall duly take the best practice report into consideration when fixing or approving transmission tariffs and distribution tariffs or their methodologies in accordance with Article 59 of Directive (EU) 2019/944.
Amendment rationale: CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL Reasons for and objectives of the proposal 1.1. Policy context Energy prices significantly increased throughout 2021 and 2022. This resulted from reductions in gas supply, particularly after the start of Russia’s war against Ukraine and the weaponisation of energy as well as from domestic shortfalls in hydropower and nuclear power. The price rises also resulted from increased energy demand, as the global economy picked up after the COVID-19 pandemic. These price rises were rapidly felt by households, industry and businesses across the EU, and governments immediately took steps to mitigate them. At the European level, the EU swiftly provided an energy prices toolbox 1 with measures to address high prices , in particular for the most vulnerable consumers (including income support, tax breaks, gas saving and storage measures), as well as the REPowerEU plan 2 with further measures and funding to boost energy efficiency and renewable energy in order to reduce dependence on Russian fossil fuels. This was followed by the creation of a temporary State Aid regime 3 to allow certain measures to soften the impact of high prices, a strong gas storage regime 4 , effective demand reduction measures for gas 5 and electricity 6 , faster renewable energy and grid permitting processes 7 , and price limiting regimes to avoid windfall profits in both the gas and electricity markets 8 . These short-term measures helped Member States to deal with the immediate fall-out of the energy crisis. However, the crisis also showed how exposed consumers and industries are and our lack of resilience to energy price spikes. The impact of fossil fuel-based generation on setting electricity prices was seen as excessive by businesses and citizens, while Member States’ ability to cushion short term prices with longer term contracts appeared inadequate. For this reason, the European Commission President announced in the 2022 State of the Union Address 9 the need for a fundamental reform of the electricity market design. Whilst the EU’s internal energy market delivers huge gains and growth across Europe, the recent energy crisis has highlighted that the energy market design’s short-term focus can distract from broader, longer-term goals. The reflection of short-term prices in consumers bills led to price shocks where energy bills of many consumers tripled or quadrupled, even as the costs of wind and solar power were declining; the sudden exposure to volatile and high prices triggered some supplier bankruptcies; many industrial enterprises in energy intensive sectors were obliged to shut down. Therefore, the proposal includes a set of measures aimed to create a buffer between short-term markets and electricity bills paid by consumers, in particular by way of incentivizing longer term contracting, to improve the functioning of short-term markets to better integrate renewables and enhance the role of flexibility and to empower and protect consumers. The recent price volatility has also highlighted the lack of flexibility in the electricity grid, with prices set too often by gas-fired generation and with a general lack of low carbon flexible supply, demand response and energy storage. As more wind and solar power enter the system, low-carbon flexible technologies will be needed to balance the variable supply with variable demand. In parallel with this proposal, the Commission is making recommendations for the advancement of storage innovation, technologies, and capacities. More broadly, the sensitivity of the electricity price to fossil fuel prices highlighted the need to speed up the deployment of renewables together with the flexibility of the power system to displace fossil fuels. REPowerEU provides such a boost to renewable energy and with it, a boost to economic growth and quality jobs creation . It builds on the European Green Deal’s drive to improve European competitiveness through innovation and the transition to a net zero economy and is closely aligned with the Commission’s Green Deal Industrial Plan. To facilitate the investments needed in the face of recent price volatility, uncoordinated regulatory interventions and grid and regulatory barriers to entry, fundamental reform is needed. Finally, in the Report on the final outcome of the Conference on the Future of Europe, citizens asked the EU institutions to take measures to “Enhance European energy security, and achieve the EU’s energy independence” and to ‘Reduce dependency of EU from foreign actors in economically strategic sectors’, including energy 10 1.2. Objectives of the proposal The proposal is addressing consumer, industry and investors’ concerns over exposure to volatile short-term prices, driven by high prices of fossil fuels. It will optimize the electricity market design by complementing the short-term markets with a greater role for longer-term instruments, allowing consumers to benefit from more fixed priced contracts, and facilitating investments in clean technologies. Ultimately, it will mean that less fossil fuel generation is needed and will lead to lower prices for consumers during future fossil fuel crisis due to the low operational costs of renewable and low carbon energy. The proposal is putting forward measures to protect consumers from such volatility, empower them with greater contract choice and more direct access to renewable and low carbon energy. To improve investment conditions for businesses, in particular those pursuing decarbonisation pathways. it proposes measures to counter exposure to short term price spikes through power purchase agreements and more prudential obligations for energy suppliers. It also proposes measures to improve the way variable renewable and low carbon energies are integrated into the short-term market. This includes measures boosting the use of demand response and storage, among other forms of non-fossil flexibility. The proposal also improves and clarifies access to longer term contracts for developers (both State supported such as contracts for difference, and private, such as power purchase agreements) in order to provide secure, stable revenues for renewable and low carbon energy developers and bring down risk and capital costs while avoiding windfall profits in periods of high prices. Whilst the current market design has over many decades delivered an efficient, increasingly integrated market, the energy crisis has highlighted a number of shortcomings relating to: (i) insufficient tools to protect consumers, including businesses, against high short term prices; (ii) the excessive influence of fossil fuel prices on electricity prices and the failure for low cost renewables and low carbon energy to be better reflected in electricity bills; (iii) the impact of extreme price volatility and regulatory interventions on investment; (iv) the lack of sufficient non-fossil flexibility (such as storage or demand response) that could reduce dependence on gas-fired generation; (v) the limited choice of supplier contract types; (vi) the difficulties to directly access renewable energy though energy sharing; and (vii) the need for robust monitoring of the energy market to better protect against market abuse. To protect consumers from volatile prices, the proposal will provide for the right to fixed price contacts as well as dynamic price contracts, the right to multiple contracts and to better and clearer contract information. Consumers will be offered variety of contracts that best fits their circumstances. In this way, consumers, including small businesses, can lock in secure, long-term prices to mitigate the impact of sudden price shocks, and/or they may choose to have dynamic pricing contracts with suppliers if they wish to take advantage of price variability to use electricity when it is cheaper (e.g., to charge electric cars or use heat pumps). Such a combination of both dynamic and fixed pricing allows to keep market incentives for consumers to adjust their electricity demand, while providing more certainty also for those who wish to invest in renewable energy sources (rooftop solar panels for instance) and stability of costs. In addition to the existing protection framework for energy poor and vulnerable consumers, the proposal will also provide access to regulated retail prices for households and SME consumers in the event of a crisis and stabilise the supply industry by requiring that suppliers make more effort to guard against high price spikes by making greater use of forward contracts with generators (locking in future prices) and by requiring Member States to establish a supplier of last resort regime. The proposal will empower consumers by creating the right to share renewable energy directly, without the need to create energy communities. Greater energy sharing (e.g., sharing surplus roof top solar power with a neighbour) can improve the use made of low cost renewable energy and provide greater access to direct use of renewable energy for consumers who might not otherwise have such access. To enhance stability and predictability of the cost of energy, thereby contributing to the competitiveness of the EU economy facing excessive volatile prices, the proposal intends to enhance market access to more stable longer-term contracts and markets. Power purchase agreements (PPAs) - long-term private contracts between a generator (typically renewable or low carbon) and a consumer – can protect against price volatility, but they are currently mostly available only to large energy consumers in very few Member States. A barrier to the growth of this market is the credit risk that a consumer will not always be able to buy the electricity over the whole period. To address this, Member States should ensure that instruments to reduce the financial risks associated to off-taker payment default in the framework of PPAs, including guarantee schemes at market prices, are accessible to companies that face entry barriers to the PPA market and are not in financial difficulty. To further encourage the growth of the market for such agreements, renewable and low carbon energy project developers participating in a public support tender should be allowed to reserve a share of the generation for sale through a PPA. In addition, Member States should endeavour to apply in some of these tenders' evaluation criteria to incentivise the access to the PPA market for customers that face entry barriers. Finally, the obligation on suppliers to hedge appropriately may also boost demand for PPAs (which are a way of locking in future prices). Some forms of public support guarantee the energy producer a minimum price by the government but allow for the producer to nevertheless earn the full market price even when this market price is very high. With the recent high prices much (cheap) publicly supported energy has been receiving these high market prices. To curb this and so stabilise prices, investment support should be structured as “two-way” (two-way contract for difference), which set a minimum price but also a maximum price, so any revenues above the ceiling are paid back. The proposal will apply to new investments for the generation of electricity, which include investments in new power-generating facilities, investments aimed at repowering existing power-generating facilities, investments aimed at extending existing power-generating facilities or at prolonging their lifetime. Moreover, the proposal will require that such money is then channelled to support all electricity consumers in proportion to their consumption to mitigate the effect of high prices. A further means of guarding against volatile prices is to use long term contracts that lock in future prices (“forward contracts”). This market shows low liquidity in many Member States but could be boosted across the EU, so that more suppliers or consumers can guard against excessively volatile prices over longer periods of time. The proposal will create regional reference prices via a hub to increase price transparency and oblige system operators to allow transmission rights longer than a year, so that if a forward contract is between parties across regions or borders, they can ensure transmission of the electricity. Finally, to ensure markets that behave competitively and prices are set transparently, regulators’ ability to monitor energy market integrity and transparency will be enhanced. The third objective is to boost renewable energy investment, in order to ensure that deployment triples, in line with European Green Deal goals. This will be achieved partly by improving the markets for long term contracts. Power purchase agreements and contracts for difference not only provide consumers with stable prices, they also give renewable energy suppliers reliable revenues. This lowers their financial risk and greatly reduces their cost of capital. This creates a virtuous circle where stable revenues lower costs and boost demand for renewable energy. Renewable energy is also a better investment when its ability to produce power is not curtailed due to technical constraints in the system. The more flexible the system is (generation that can rapidly turn on or off, storage that can absorb or put power onto the system, or responsive consumers who can increase or decrease their demand for power) the more stable prices can be and the more renewable energy the system can integrate. For this reason, the proposal requires Member States to assess their needs for power system flexibility, establish objectives to deliver on these needs. Member States can design or redesign capacity mechanisms in order to promote low-carbon flexibility. Moreover, the proposal opens the possibility for Member States to introduce new support schemes for non-fossil flexibility such as demand side response and storage. System operators should also play an enhanced role integrating renewables into the grid, partly by increasing transparency surrounding availability of grid connection capacity. First, this clearer information would enhance renewable energy developers’ ability to develop renewables in areas where the grid is less congested. Second, renewable energy can be more efficiently traded and balanced in the system if trades between market participants can take place closer to “real time”. If offers to supply electricity are made minutes before consumption rather than hours before consumption, the offers from wind and solar power producers are more accurate, more wind and solar power can be consumed and the “imbalance costs” of the system are reduced. Thus, trading deadlines will be brought closer to real time. 
Revised version (Article 18 Charges for access to networks, use of networks and reinforcement):
1. Charges applied by network operators for access to networks, including charges for connection to the networks, charges for use of networks, and, where applicable, charges for related network reinforcements, shall be cost-reflective, transparent, take into account the need for network security and flexibility and reflect actual costs incurred insofar as they correspond to those of an efficient and structurally comparable network operator and are applied in a non-discriminatory manner. Those charges shall not include unrelated costs supporting unrelated policy objectives. Without prejudice to Article 15(1) and (6) of Directive 2012/27/EU and the criteria in Annex XI to that Directive the method used to determine the network charges shall neutrally support overall system efficiency over the long run through price signals to customers and producers and in particular be applied in a way which does not discriminate positively or negatively between production connected at the distribution level and production connected at the transmission level. The network charges shall not discriminate either positively or negatively against energy storage or aggregation and shall not create disincentives for self-generation, self-consumption or for participation in demand response. Without prejudice to paragraph 3 of this Article, those charges shall not be distance-related. 3. Where appropriate, the level of the tariffs applied to producers or final customers, or to both shall provide locational investment signals at Union level, such as incentives via tariff structure to reduce re-dispatching and power grid reinforcement costs and take into account the amount of network losses and congestion caused, and investment costs for infrastructure. 4. When setting the charges for network access, the following shall be taken into account: (a) payments and receipts resulting from the inter-transmission system operator compensation mechanism; (b) actual payments made and received as well as payments expected for future periods, estimated on the basis of previous periods. 5. Setting the charges for network access under this Article shall be without prejudice to charges resulting from congestion management referred to in Article 16. 6. There shall be no specific network charge on individual transactions for cross-zonal trading of electricity. 7. Distribution tariffs shall be cost-reflective taking into account the use of the distribution network by system users including active customers. Distribution tariffs may contain network connection capacity elements and may be differentiated based on system users' consumption or generation profiles. Where Member States have implemented the deployment of smart metering systems, regulatory authorities shall consider time-differentiated network tariffs when fixing or approving transmission tariffs and distribution tariffs or their methodologies in accordance with Article 59 of (EU) 2019/944 and, where appropriate, time-differentiated network tariffs may be introduced to reflect the use of the network, in a transparent, cost efficient and foreseeable way for the final customer. 8. Transmission and distribution tariff methodologies shall provide incentives to transmission system operators and distribution system operators for the most cost-efficient operation and development of their networks including through the procurement of services. For that purpose, regulatory authorities shall recognise relevant costs as eligible, including costs related to anticipatory investment, shall include those costs in transmission and distribution tariffs, and shall, where appropriate, introduce performance targets in order to provide incentives to transmission system operators and distribution system operators to increase overall system efficiency in their networks, including through energy efficiency, the use of flexibility services and the development of smart grids and intelligent metering systems. ACER shall update the best practice report at least once every two years. 10. Regulatory authorities shall duly take the best practice report into consideration when fixing or approving transmission tariffs and distribution tariffs or their methodologies in accordance with Article 59 of Directive (EU) 2019/944.
Article 19 Congestion income
1. Congestion-management procedures associated with a pre-specified timeframe may generate revenue only in the event of congestion which arises for that timeframe, except in the case of new interconnectors which benefit from an exemption under Article 63 of this Regulation, Article 17 of Regulation (EC) No 714/2009 or Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 1228/2003. The procedure for the distribution of those revenues shall be subject to review by the regulatory authorities and shall neither distort the allocation process in favour of any party requesting capacity or energy nor provide a disincentive to reduce congestion. 2. The following objectives shall have priority with the respect to the allocation of any revenues resulting from the allocation of cross-zonal capacity: (a) guaranteeing the actual availability of the allocated capacity including firmness compensation; or (b) maintaining or increasing cross-zonal capacities through optimisation of the usage of existing interconnectors by means of coordinated remedial actions, where applicable, or covering costs resulting from network investments that are relevant to reduce interconnector congestion. 3. Where the priority objectives set out in paragraph 2 have been adequately fulfilled, the revenues may be used as income to be taken into account by the regulatory authorities when approving the methodology for calculating network tariffs or fixing network tariffs, or both. The residual revenues shall be placed on a separate internal account line until such a time as it can be spent for the purposes set out in paragraph 2. 4. The use of revenues in accordance with point (a) or (b) of paragraph 2 shall be subject to a methodology proposed by the transmission system operators after consulting regulatory authorities and relevant stakeholders and after approval by ACER. The transmission system operators shall submit the proposed methodology to ACER by 5 July 2020 and ACER shall decide on the proposed methodology within six months of receiving it. ACER may request transmission system operators to amend or update the methodology referred to in the first subparagraph. ACER shall decide on the amended or updated methodology not later than six months after its submission. The methodology shall set out at least the conditions under which the revenues can be used for the purposes referred to in paragraph 2, the conditions under which those revenues may be placed on a separate internal account line for future use for those purposes, and for how long those revenues may be placed on such an account line. 5. Where some of the congestion revenues are used when calculating network tariffs, the report shall set out how the transmission system operators fulfilled the priority objectives set out in paragraph 2 where applicable.
Amendment rationale: CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL Reasons for and objectives of the proposal 1.1. Policy context Energy prices significantly increased throughout 2021 and 2022. This resulted from reductions in gas supply, particularly after the start of Russia’s war against Ukraine and the weaponisation of energy as well as from domestic shortfalls in hydropower and nuclear power. The price rises also resulted from increased energy demand, as the global economy picked up after the COVID-19 pandemic. These price rises were rapidly felt by households, industry and businesses across the EU, and governments immediately took steps to mitigate them. At the European level, the EU swiftly provided an energy prices toolbox 1 with measures to address high prices , in particular for the most vulnerable consumers (including income support, tax breaks, gas saving and storage measures), as well as the REPowerEU plan 2 with further measures and funding to boost energy efficiency and renewable energy in order to reduce dependence on Russian fossil fuels. This was followed by the creation of a temporary State Aid regime 3 to allow certain measures to soften the impact of high prices, a strong gas storage regime 4 , effective demand reduction measures for gas 5 and electricity 6 , faster renewable energy and grid permitting processes 7 , and price limiting regimes to avoid windfall profits in both the gas and electricity markets 8 . These short-term measures helped Member States to deal with the immediate fall-out of the energy crisis. However, the crisis also showed how exposed consumers and industries are and our lack of resilience to energy price spikes. The impact of fossil fuel-based generation on setting electricity prices was seen as excessive by businesses and citizens, while Member States’ ability to cushion short term prices with longer term contracts appeared inadequate. For this reason, the European Commission President announced in the 2022 State of the Union Address 9 the need for a fundamental reform of the electricity market design. Whilst the EU’s internal energy market delivers huge gains and growth across Europe, the recent energy crisis has highlighted that the energy market design’s short-term focus can distract from broader, longer-term goals. The reflection of short-term prices in consumers bills led to price shocks where energy bills of many consumers tripled or quadrupled, even as the costs of wind and solar power were declining; the sudden exposure to volatile and high prices triggered some supplier bankruptcies; many industrial enterprises in energy intensive sectors were obliged to shut down. Therefore, the proposal includes a set of measures aimed to create a buffer between short-term markets and electricity bills paid by consumers, in particular by way of incentivizing longer term contracting, to improve the functioning of short-term markets to better integrate renewables and enhance the role of flexibility and to empower and protect consumers. The recent price volatility has also highlighted the lack of flexibility in the electricity grid, with prices set too often by gas-fired generation and with a general lack of low carbon flexible supply, demand response and energy storage. As more wind and solar power enter the system, low-carbon flexible technologies will be needed to balance the variable supply with variable demand. In parallel with this proposal, the Commission is making recommendations for the advancement of storage innovation, technologies, and capacities. More broadly, the sensitivity of the electricity price to fossil fuel prices highlighted the need to speed up the deployment of renewables together with the flexibility of the power system to displace fossil fuels. REPowerEU provides such a boost to renewable energy and with it, a boost to economic growth and quality jobs creation . It builds on the European Green Deal’s drive to improve European competitiveness through innovation and the transition to a net zero economy and is closely aligned with the Commission’s Green Deal Industrial Plan. To facilitate the investments needed in the face of recent price volatility, uncoordinated regulatory interventions and grid and regulatory barriers to entry, fundamental reform is needed. Finally, in the Report on the final outcome of the Conference on the Future of Europe, citizens asked the EU institutions to take measures to “Enhance European energy security, and achieve the EU’s energy independence” and to ‘Reduce dependency of EU from foreign actors in economically strategic sectors’, including energy 10 1.2. Objectives of the proposal The proposal is addressing consumer, industry and investors’ concerns over exposure to volatile short-term prices, driven by high prices of fossil fuels. It will optimize the electricity market design by complementing the short-term markets with a greater role for longer-term instruments, allowing consumers to benefit from more fixed priced contracts, and facilitating investments in clean technologies. Ultimately, it will mean that less fossil fuel generation is needed and will lead to lower prices for consumers during future fossil fuel crisis due to the low operational costs of renewable and low carbon energy. The proposal is putting forward measures to protect consumers from such volatility, empower them with greater contract choice and more direct access to renewable and low carbon energy. To improve investment conditions for businesses, in particular those pursuing decarbonisation pathways. it proposes measures to counter exposure to short term price spikes through power purchase agreements and more prudential obligations for energy suppliers. It also proposes measures to improve the way variable renewable and low carbon energies are integrated into the short-term market. This includes measures boosting the use of demand response and storage, among other forms of non-fossil flexibility. The proposal also improves and clarifies access to longer term contracts for developers (both State supported such as contracts for difference, and private, such as power purchase agreements) in order to provide secure, stable revenues for renewable and low carbon energy developers and bring down risk and capital costs while avoiding windfall profits in periods of high prices. Whilst the current market design has over many decades delivered an efficient, increasingly integrated market, the energy crisis has highlighted a number of shortcomings relating to: (i) insufficient tools to protect consumers, including businesses, against high short term prices; (ii) the excessive influence of fossil fuel prices on electricity prices and the failure for low cost renewables and low carbon energy to be better reflected in electricity bills; (iii) the impact of extreme price volatility and regulatory interventions on investment; (iv) the lack of sufficient non-fossil flexibility (such as storage or demand response) that could reduce dependence on gas-fired generation; (v) the limited choice of supplier contract types; (vi) the difficulties to directly access renewable energy though energy sharing; and (vii) the need for robust monitoring of the energy market to better protect against market abuse. To protect consumers from volatile prices, the proposal will provide for the right to fixed price contacts as well as dynamic price contracts, the right to multiple contracts and to better and clearer contract information. Consumers will be offered variety of contracts that best fits their circumstances. In this way, consumers, including small businesses, can lock in secure, long-term prices to mitigate the impact of sudden price shocks, and/or they may choose to have dynamic pricing contracts with suppliers if they wish to take advantage of price variability to use electricity when it is cheaper (e.g., to charge electric cars or use heat pumps). Such a combination of both dynamic and fixed pricing allows to keep market incentives for consumers to adjust their electricity demand, while providing more certainty also for those who wish to invest in renewable energy sources (rooftop solar panels for instance) and stability of costs. In addition to the existing protection framework for energy poor and vulnerable consumers, the proposal will also provide access to regulated retail prices for households and SME consumers in the event of a crisis and stabilise the supply industry by requiring that suppliers make more effort to guard against high price spikes by making greater use of forward contracts with generators (locking in future prices) and by requiring Member States to establish a supplier of last resort regime. The proposal will empower consumers by creating the right to share renewable energy directly, without the need to create energy communities. Greater energy sharing (e.g., sharing surplus roof top solar power with a neighbour) can improve the use made of low cost renewable energy and provide greater access to direct use of renewable energy for consumers who might not otherwise have such access. To enhance stability and predictability of the cost of energy, thereby contributing to the competitiveness of the EU economy facing excessive volatile prices, the proposal intends to enhance market access to more stable longer-term contracts and markets. Power purchase agreements (PPAs) - long-term private contracts between a generator (typically renewable or low carbon) and a consumer – can protect against price volatility, but they are currently mostly available only to large energy consumers in very few Member States. A barrier to the growth of this market is the credit risk that a consumer will not always be able to buy the electricity over the whole period. To address this, Member States should ensure that instruments to reduce the financial risks associated to off-taker payment default in the framework of PPAs, including guarantee schemes at market prices, are accessible to companies that face entry barriers to the PPA market and are not in financial difficulty. To further encourage the growth of the market for such agreements, renewable and low carbon energy project developers participating in a public support tender should be allowed to reserve a share of the generation for sale through a PPA. In addition, Member States should endeavour to apply in some of these tenders' evaluation criteria to incentivise the access to the PPA market for customers that face entry barriers. Finally, the obligation on suppliers to hedge appropriately may also boost demand for PPAs (which are a way of locking in future prices). Some forms of public support guarantee the energy producer a minimum price by the government but allow for the producer to nevertheless earn the full market price even when this market price is very high. With the recent high prices much (cheap) publicly supported energy has been receiving these high market prices. To curb this and so stabilise prices, investment support should be structured as “two-way” (two-way contract for difference), which set a minimum price but also a maximum price, so any revenues above the ceiling are paid back. The proposal will apply to new investments for the generation of electricity, which include investments in new power-generating facilities, investments aimed at repowering existing power-generating facilities, investments aimed at extending existing power-generating facilities or at prolonging their lifetime. Moreover, the proposal will require that such money is then channelled to support all electricity consumers in proportion to their consumption to mitigate the effect of high prices. A further means of guarding against volatile prices is to use long term contracts that lock in future prices (“forward contracts”). This market shows low liquidity in many Member States but could be boosted across the EU, so that more suppliers or consumers can guard against excessively volatile prices over longer periods of time. The proposal will create regional reference prices via a hub to increase price transparency and oblige system operators to allow transmission rights longer than a year, so that if a forward contract is between parties across regions or borders, they can ensure transmission of the electricity. Finally, to ensure markets that behave competitively and prices are set transparently, regulators’ ability to monitor energy market integrity and transparency will be enhanced. The third objective is to boost renewable energy investment, in order to ensure that deployment triples, in line with European Green Deal goals. This will be achieved partly by improving the markets for long term contracts. Power purchase agreements and contracts for difference not only provide consumers with stable prices, they also give renewable energy suppliers reliable revenues. This lowers their financial risk and greatly reduces their cost of capital. This creates a virtuous circle where stable revenues lower costs and boost demand for renewable energy. Renewable energy is also a better investment when its ability to produce power is not curtailed due to technical constraints in the system. The more flexible the system is (generation that can rapidly turn on or off, storage that can absorb or put power onto the system, or responsive consumers who can increase or decrease their demand for power) the more stable prices can be and the more renewable energy the system can integrate. For this reason, the proposal requires Member States to assess their needs for power system flexibility, establish objectives to deliver on these needs. Member States can design or redesign capacity mechanisms in order to promote low-carbon flexibility. Moreover, the proposal opens the possibility for Member States to introduce new support schemes for non-fossil flexibility such as demand side response and storage. System operators should also play an enhanced role integrating renewables into the grid, partly by increasing transparency surrounding availability of grid connection capacity. First, this clearer information would enhance renewable energy developers’ ability to develop renewables in areas where the grid is less congested. Second, renewable energy can be more efficiently traded and balanced in the system if trades between market participants can take place closer to “real time”. If offers to supply electricity are made minutes before consumption rather than hours before consumption, the offers from wind and solar power producers are more accurate, more wind and solar power can be consumed and the “imbalance costs” of the system are reduced. Thus, trading deadlines will be brought closer to real time. 
Revised version (Article 19 Congestion income):
1. Congestion-management procedures associated with a pre-specified timeframe may generate revenue only in the event of congestion which arises for that timeframe, except in the case of new interconnectors which benefit from an exemption under Article 63 of this Regulation, Article 17 of Regulation (EC) No 714/2009 or Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 1228/2003. The procedure for the distribution of those revenues shall be subject to review by the regulatory authorities and shall neither distort the allocation process in favour of any party requesting capacity or energy nor provide a disincentive to reduce congestion. The compensation referred to in point (c) of the first subparagraph shall apply where, in the validated capacity calculation results, one or more transmission system operators either have not made available the capacity agreed in connection agreements on the interconnector or have not made available the capacity on the critical network elements pursuant to the capacity calculation rules laid down in Article 16(8), or both. The transmission system operators which are responsible for the reduction of access to interconnected markets shall be responsible for the compensation to offshore renewable electricity generation plant operators. On an annual basis, that compensation shall not exceed the total congestion income generated on interconnectors between the bidding zones concerned. 3. Where the priority objectives set out in paragraph 2 have been adequately fulfilled, the revenues may be used as income to be taken into account by the regulatory authorities when approving the methodology for calculating network tariffs or fixing network tariffs, or both. The residual revenues shall be placed on a separate internal account line until such a time as it can be spent for the purposes set out in paragraph 2. 4. The use of revenues in accordance with point (a) or (b) of paragraph 2 shall be subject to a methodology proposed by the transmission system operators after consulting regulatory authorities and relevant stakeholders and after approval by ACER. The transmission system operators shall submit the proposed methodology to ACER by 5 July 2020 and ACER shall decide on the proposed methodology within six months of receiving it. ACER may request transmission system operators to amend or update the methodology referred to in the first subparagraph. ACER shall decide on the amended or updated methodology not later than six months after its submission. The methodology shall set out at least the conditions under which the revenues can be used for the purposes referred to in paragraph 2, the conditions under which those revenues may be placed on a separate internal account line for future use for those purposes, and for how long those revenues may be placed on such an account line. 5. Where some of the congestion revenues are used when calculating network tariffs, the report shall set out how the transmission system operators fulfilled the priority objectives set out in paragraph 2 where applicable.
Article 20 Resource adequacy in the internal market for electricity
1. Member States shall monitor resource adequacy within their territory on the basis of the European resource adequacy assessment referred to in Article 23. For the purpose of complementing the European resource adequacy assessment, Member States may also carry out national resource adequacy assessments pursuant to Article 24. 2. Where the European resource adequacy assessment referred to in Article 23 or national resource adequacy assessment referred to in Article 24 identifies a resource adequacy concern, the Member State concerned shall identify any regulatory distortions or market failures that caused or contributed to the emergence of the concern. 4. The Member States concerned shall submit their implementation plans to the Commission for review. 5. Within four months of receipt of the implementation plan, the Commission shall issue an opinion on whether the measures are sufficient to eliminate the regulatory distortions or market failures that were identified pursuant to paragraph 2, and may invite the Member States to amend their implementation plans accordingly. 6. The Member States concerned shall monitor the application of their implementation plans and shall publish the results of the monitoring in an annual report and shall submit that report to the Commission. 7. The Commission shall issue an opinion on whether the implementation plans have been sufficiently implemented and whether the resource adequacy concern has been resolved. 8. Member States shall continue to adhere to the implementation plan after the identified resource adequacy concern has been resolved.
Article 21 General principles for capacity mechanisms
1. To eliminate residual resource adequacy concerns, Member States may, as a last resort while implementing the measures referred to in Article 20(3) of this Regulation in accordance with Article 107, 108 and 109 of the TFEU, introduce capacity mechanisms. 2. Before introducing capacity mechanisms, the Member States concerned shall conduct a comprehensive study of the possible effects of such mechanisms on the neighbouring Member States by consulting at least its neighbouring Member States to which they have a direct network connection and the stakeholders of those Member States. 3. Member States shall assess whether a capacity mechanism in the form of strategic reserve is capable of addressing the resource adequacy concerns. Where this is not the case, Member States may implement a different type of capacity mechanism. 4. Member States shall not introduce capacity mechanisms where both the European resource adequacy assessment and the national resource adequacy assessment, or in the absence of a national resource adequacy assessment, the European resource adequacy assessment have not identified a resource adequacy concern. 5. Member States shall not introduce capacity mechanisms before the implementation plan as referred to in Article 20(3) has received an opinion by the Commission as referred to in Article 20(5). 6. Where a Member State applies a capacity mechanism, it shall review that capacity mechanism and shall ensure that no new contracts are concluded under that mechanism where both the European resource adequacy assessment and the national resource adequacy assessment, or in the absence of a national resource adequacy assessment, the European resource adequacy assessment have not identified a resource adequacy concern or the implementation plan as referred to in Article 20(3) has not received an opinion by the Commission as referred to in Article 20(5). 7. When designing capacity mechanisms Member States shall include a provision allowing for an efficient administrative phase-out of the capacity mechanism where no new contracts are concluded under paragraph 6 during three consecutive years. 8. Capacity mechanisms shall be temporary. They shall be approved by the Commission for no longer than 10 years. They shall be phased out or the amount of the committed capacities shall be reduced on the basis of the implementation plans referred to in Article 20. Member States shall continue to apply the implementation plan after the introduction of the capacity mechanism.
Amendment rationale: CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL Reasons for and objectives of the proposal 1.1. Policy context Energy prices significantly increased throughout 2021 and 2022. This resulted from reductions in gas supply, particularly after the start of Russia’s war against Ukraine and the weaponisation of energy as well as from domestic shortfalls in hydropower and nuclear power. The price rises also resulted from increased energy demand, as the global economy picked up after the COVID-19 pandemic. These price rises were rapidly felt by households, industry and businesses across the EU, and governments immediately took steps to mitigate them. At the European level, the EU swiftly provided an energy prices toolbox 1 with measures to address high prices , in particular for the most vulnerable consumers (including income support, tax breaks, gas saving and storage measures), as well as the REPowerEU plan 2 with further measures and funding to boost energy efficiency and renewable energy in order to reduce dependence on Russian fossil fuels. This was followed by the creation of a temporary State Aid regime 3 to allow certain measures to soften the impact of high prices, a strong gas storage regime 4 , effective demand reduction measures for gas 5 and electricity 6 , faster renewable energy and grid permitting processes 7 , and price limiting regimes to avoid windfall profits in both the gas and electricity markets 8 . These short-term measures helped Member States to deal with the immediate fall-out of the energy crisis. However, the crisis also showed how exposed consumers and industries are and our lack of resilience to energy price spikes. The impact of fossil fuel-based generation on setting electricity prices was seen as excessive by businesses and citizens, while Member States’ ability to cushion short term prices with longer term contracts appeared inadequate. For this reason, the European Commission President announced in the 2022 State of the Union Address 9 the need for a fundamental reform of the electricity market design. Whilst the EU’s internal energy market delivers huge gains and growth across Europe, the recent energy crisis has highlighted that the energy market design’s short-term focus can distract from broader, longer-term goals. The reflection of short-term prices in consumers bills led to price shocks where energy bills of many consumers tripled or quadrupled, even as the costs of wind and solar power were declining; the sudden exposure to volatile and high prices triggered some supplier bankruptcies; many industrial enterprises in energy intensive sectors were obliged to shut down. Therefore, the proposal includes a set of measures aimed to create a buffer between short-term markets and electricity bills paid by consumers, in particular by way of incentivizing longer term contracting, to improve the functioning of short-term markets to better integrate renewables and enhance the role of flexibility and to empower and protect consumers. The recent price volatility has also highlighted the lack of flexibility in the electricity grid, with prices set too often by gas-fired generation and with a general lack of low carbon flexible supply, demand response and energy storage. As more wind and solar power enter the system, low-carbon flexible technologies will be needed to balance the variable supply with variable demand. In parallel with this proposal, the Commission is making recommendations for the advancement of storage innovation, technologies, and capacities. More broadly, the sensitivity of the electricity price to fossil fuel prices highlighted the need to speed up the deployment of renewables together with the flexibility of the power system to displace fossil fuels. REPowerEU provides such a boost to renewable energy and with it, a boost to economic growth and quality jobs creation . It builds on the European Green Deal’s drive to improve European competitiveness through innovation and the transition to a net zero economy and is closely aligned with the Commission’s Green Deal Industrial Plan. To facilitate the investments needed in the face of recent price volatility, uncoordinated regulatory interventions and grid and regulatory barriers to entry, fundamental reform is needed. Finally, in the Report on the final outcome of the Conference on the Future of Europe, citizens asked the EU institutions to take measures to “Enhance European energy security, and achieve the EU’s energy independence” and to ‘Reduce dependency of EU from foreign actors in economically strategic sectors’, including energy 10 1.2. Objectives of the proposal The proposal is addressing consumer, industry and investors’ concerns over exposure to volatile short-term prices, driven by high prices of fossil fuels. It will optimize the electricity market design by complementing the short-term markets with a greater role for longer-term instruments, allowing consumers to benefit from more fixed priced contracts, and facilitating investments in clean technologies. Ultimately, it will mean that less fossil fuel generation is needed and will lead to lower prices for consumers during future fossil fuel crisis due to the low operational costs of renewable and low carbon energy. The proposal is putting forward measures to protect consumers from such volatility, empower them with greater contract choice and more direct access to renewable and low carbon energy. To improve investment conditions for businesses, in particular those pursuing decarbonisation pathways. it proposes measures to counter exposure to short term price spikes through power purchase agreements and more prudential obligations for energy suppliers. It also proposes measures to improve the way variable renewable and low carbon energies are integrated into the short-term market. This includes measures boosting the use of demand response and storage, among other forms of non-fossil flexibility. The proposal also improves and clarifies access to longer term contracts for developers (both State supported such as contracts for difference, and private, such as power purchase agreements) in order to provide secure, stable revenues for renewable and low carbon energy developers and bring down risk and capital costs while avoiding windfall profits in periods of high prices. Whilst the current market design has over many decades delivered an efficient, increasingly integrated market, the energy crisis has highlighted a number of shortcomings relating to: (i) insufficient tools to protect consumers, including businesses, against high short term prices; (ii) the excessive influence of fossil fuel prices on electricity prices and the failure for low cost renewables and low carbon energy to be better reflected in electricity bills; (iii) the impact of extreme price volatility and regulatory interventions on investment; (iv) the lack of sufficient non-fossil flexibility (such as storage or demand response) that could reduce dependence on gas-fired generation; (v) the limited choice of supplier contract types; (vi) the difficulties to directly access renewable energy though energy sharing; and (vii) the need for robust monitoring of the energy market to better protect against market abuse. To protect consumers from volatile prices, the proposal will provide for the right to fixed price contacts as well as dynamic price contracts, the right to multiple contracts and to better and clearer contract information. Consumers will be offered variety of contracts that best fits their circumstances. In this way, consumers, including small businesses, can lock in secure, long-term prices to mitigate the impact of sudden price shocks, and/or they may choose to have dynamic pricing contracts with suppliers if they wish to take advantage of price variability to use electricity when it is cheaper (e.g., to charge electric cars or use heat pumps). Such a combination of both dynamic and fixed pricing allows to keep market incentives for consumers to adjust their electricity demand, while providing more certainty also for those who wish to invest in renewable energy sources (rooftop solar panels for instance) and stability of costs. In addition to the existing protection framework for energy poor and vulnerable consumers, the proposal will also provide access to regulated retail prices for households and SME consumers in the event of a crisis and stabilise the supply industry by requiring that suppliers make more effort to guard against high price spikes by making greater use of forward contracts with generators (locking in future prices) and by requiring Member States to establish a supplier of last resort regime. The proposal will empower consumers by creating the right to share renewable energy directly, without the need to create energy communities. Greater energy sharing (e.g., sharing surplus roof top solar power with a neighbour) can improve the use made of low cost renewable energy and provide greater access to direct use of renewable energy for consumers who might not otherwise have such access. To enhance stability and predictability of the cost of energy, thereby contributing to the competitiveness of the EU economy facing excessive volatile prices, the proposal intends to enhance market access to more stable longer-term contracts and markets. Power purchase agreements (PPAs) - long-term private contracts between a generator (typically renewable or low carbon) and a consumer – can protect against price volatility, but they are currently mostly available only to large energy consumers in very few Member States. A barrier to the growth of this market is the credit risk that a consumer will not always be able to buy the electricity over the whole period. To address this, Member States should ensure that instruments to reduce the financial risks associated to off-taker payment default in the framework of PPAs, including guarantee schemes at market prices, are accessible to companies that face entry barriers to the PPA market and are not in financial difficulty. To further encourage the growth of the market for such agreements, renewable and low carbon energy project developers participating in a public support tender should be allowed to reserve a share of the generation for sale through a PPA. In addition, Member States should endeavour to apply in some of these tenders' evaluation criteria to incentivise the access to the PPA market for customers that face entry barriers. Finally, the obligation on suppliers to hedge appropriately may also boost demand for PPAs (which are a way of locking in future prices). Some forms of public support guarantee the energy producer a minimum price by the government but allow for the producer to nevertheless earn the full market price even when this market price is very high. With the recent high prices much (cheap) publicly supported energy has been receiving these high market prices. To curb this and so stabilise prices, investment support should be structured as “two-way” (two-way contract for difference), which set a minimum price but also a maximum price, so any revenues above the ceiling are paid back. The proposal will apply to new investments for the generation of electricity, which include investments in new power-generating facilities, investments aimed at repowering existing power-generating facilities, investments aimed at extending existing power-generating facilities or at prolonging their lifetime. Moreover, the proposal will require that such money is then channelled to support all electricity consumers in proportion to their consumption to mitigate the effect of high prices. A further means of guarding against volatile prices is to use long term contracts that lock in future prices (“forward contracts”). This market shows low liquidity in many Member States but could be boosted across the EU, so that more suppliers or consumers can guard against excessively volatile prices over longer periods of time. The proposal will create regional reference prices via a hub to increase price transparency and oblige system operators to allow transmission rights longer than a year, so that if a forward contract is between parties across regions or borders, they can ensure transmission of the electricity. Finally, to ensure markets that behave competitively and prices are set transparently, regulators’ ability to monitor energy market integrity and transparency will be enhanced. The third objective is to boost renewable energy investment, in order to ensure that deployment triples, in line with European Green Deal goals. This will be achieved partly by improving the markets for long term contracts. Power purchase agreements and contracts for difference not only provide consumers with stable prices, they also give renewable energy suppliers reliable revenues. This lowers their financial risk and greatly reduces their cost of capital. This creates a virtuous circle where stable revenues lower costs and boost demand for renewable energy. Renewable energy is also a better investment when its ability to produce power is not curtailed due to technical constraints in the system. The more flexible the system is (generation that can rapidly turn on or off, storage that can absorb or put power onto the system, or responsive consumers who can increase or decrease their demand for power) the more stable prices can be and the more renewable energy the system can integrate. For this reason, the proposal requires Member States to assess their needs for power system flexibility, establish objectives to deliver on these needs. Member States can design or redesign capacity mechanisms in order to promote low-carbon flexibility. Moreover, the proposal opens the possibility for Member States to introduce new support schemes for non-fossil flexibility such as demand side response and storage. System operators should also play an enhanced role integrating renewables into the grid, partly by increasing transparency surrounding availability of grid connection capacity. First, this clearer information would enhance renewable energy developers’ ability to develop renewables in areas where the grid is less congested. Second, renewable energy can be more efficiently traded and balanced in the system if trades between market participants can take place closer to “real time”. If offers to supply electricity are made minutes before consumption rather than hours before consumption, the offers from wind and solar power producers are more accurate, more wind and solar power can be consumed and the “imbalance costs” of the system are reduced. Thus, trading deadlines will be brought closer to real time. 
Revised version (Article 21 General principles for capacity mechanisms):
1. Member States may, while implementing the measures referred to in Article 20(3) of this Regulation in accordance with Articles 107, 108 and 109 TFEU, introduce capacity mechanisms. 2. Before introducing capacity mechanisms, the Member States concerned shall conduct a comprehensive study of the possible effects of such mechanisms on the neighbouring Member States by consulting at least its neighbouring Member States to which they have a direct network connection and the stakeholders of those Member States. 3. Member States shall assess whether a capacity mechanism in the form of strategic reserve is capable of addressing the resource adequacy concerns. Where this is not the case, Member States may implement a different type of capacity mechanism. 4. Member States shall not introduce capacity mechanisms where both the European resource adequacy assessment and the national resource adequacy assessment, or in the absence of a national resource adequacy assessment, the European resource adequacy assessment have not identified a resource adequacy concern. 5. Member States shall not introduce capacity mechanisms before the implementation plan as referred to in Article 20(3) has received an opinion by the Commission as referred to in Article 20(5). 6. Where a Member State applies a capacity mechanism, it shall review that capacity mechanism and shall ensure that no new contracts are concluded under that mechanism where both the European resource adequacy assessment and the national resource adequacy assessment, or in the absence of a national resource adequacy assessment, the European resource adequacy assessment have not identified a resource adequacy concern or the implementation plan as referred to in Article 20(3) has not received an opinion by the Commission as referred to in Article 20(5). 8. Capacity mechanisms shall be approved by the Commission for no longer than 10 years. The amount of the committed capacities shall be reduced on the basis of the implementation plans referred to in Article 20(3). Member States shall continue to apply the implementation plan after the introduction of the capacity mechanism.
Article 22 Design principles for capacity mechanisms
The requirement referred to in point (a) of the first subparagraph shall be without prejudice to the activation of resources before actual dispatch in order to respect the ramping constraints and operating requirements of the resources. The output of the strategic reserve during activation shall not be attributed to balance groups through wholesale markets and shall not change their imbalances. 4. Capacity mechanisms shall incorporate the following requirements regarding CO 2 emission limits: (a) from 4 July 2019 at the latest, generation capacity that started commercial production on or after that date and that emits more than 550 g of CO 2 of fossil fuel origin per kWh of electricity shall not be committed or to receive payments or commitments for future payments under a capacity mechanism; (b) from 1 July 2025 at the latest, generation capacity that started commercial production before 4 July 2019 and that emits more than 550 g of CO 2 of fossil fuel origin per kWh of electricity and more than 350 kg CO 2 of fossil fuel origin on average per year per installed kWe shall not be committed or receive payments or commitments for future payments under a capacity mechanism. The emission limit of 550 g CO 2 of fossil fuel origin per kWh of electricity and the limit of 350 kg CO 2 of fossil fuel origin on average per year per installed kWe referred to in points (a) and (b) of the first subparagraph shall be calculated on the basis of the design efficiency of the generation unit meaning the net efficiency at nominal capacity under the relevant standards provided for by the International Organization for Standardization. By 5 January 2020, ACER shall publish an opinion providing technical guidance related to the calculation of the values referred in the first subparagraph. 5. Member States that apply capacity mechanisms on 4 July 2019 shall adapt their mechanisms to comply with Chapter 4 without prejudice to commitments or contracts concluded by 31 December 2019.
Article 23 European resource adequacy assessment
1. The European resource adequacy assessment shall identify resource adequacy concerns by assessing the overall adequacy of the electricity system to supply current and projected demands for electricity at Union level, at the level of the Member States, and at the level of individual bidding zones, where relevant. The European resource adequacy assessment shall cover each year within a period of 10 years from the date of that assessment. 2. The European resource adequacy assessment shall be conducted by the ENTSO for Electricity. 3. By 5 January 2020, the ENTSO for Electricity shall submit to the Electricity Coordination Group set up under Article 1 of Commission Decision of 15 November 2012 ( 6 ) and ACER a draft methodology for the European resource adequacy assessment based on the principles provided for in paragraph 5 of this Article. 4. Transmission system operators shall provide the ENTSO for Electricity with the data it needs to carry out the European resource adequacy assessment. The ENTSO for Electricity shall carry out the European resource adequacy assessment on an annual basis. Producers and other market participants shall provide transmission system operators with data regarding expected utilisation of the generation resources, taking into account the availability of primary resources and appropriate scenarios of projected demand and supply. The methodology shall be based on transparent, objective and verifiable criteria. 7. The proposals under paragraphs 3 and 6 for the draft methodology, the scenarios, sensitivities and assumptions on which they are based, and the results of the European resource adequacy assessment under paragraph 4 shall be subject to the prior consultation of Member States, the Electricity Coordination Group and relevant stakeholders and approval by ACER under the procedure set out in Article 27.