Article 1 Subject matter and scope
1. This Regulation establishes the Union Customs Code (the Code), laying down the general rules and procedures applicable to goods brought into or taken out of the customs territory of the Union. Without prejudice to international law and conventions and Union legislation in other fields, the Code shall apply uniformly throughout the customs territory of the Union. 2. Certain provisions of the customs legislation may apply outside the customs territory of the Union within the framework of legislation governing specific fields or of international conventions. 3. Certain provisions of the customs legislation, including the simplifications for which it provides, shall apply to the trade in Union goods between parts of the customs territory of the Union to which the provisions of Directive 2006/112/EC or of Directive 2008/118/EC apply and parts of that territory where those provisions do not apply, or to trade between parts of that territory where those provisions do not apply.
Article 2 Delegation of power
The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 284 specifying the provisions of the customs legislation and the simplifications thereof with respect to the customs declaration, the proof of the customs status, the use of the internal Union transit procedure insofar as it does not affect a proper application of the fiscal measures at stake, which apply to the trade in Union goods referred to in Article 1(3). Those acts may address particular circumstances pertaining to the trade in Union goods involving only one Member State.
Article 3 Mission of customs authorities
Customs authorities shall be primarily responsible for the supervision of the Union's international trade, thereby contributing to fair and open trade, to the implementation of the external aspects of the internal market, of the common trade policy and of the other common Union policies having a bearing on trade, and to overall supply chain security. Customs authorities shall put in place measures aimed, in particular, at the following: (a) protecting the financial interests of the Union and its Member States; (b) protecting the Union from unfair and illegal trade while supporting legitimate business activity; (c) ensuring the security and safety of the Union and its residents, and the protection of the environment, where appropriate in close cooperation with other authorities; and (d) maintaining a proper balance between customs controls and facilitation of legitimate trade.
Article 4 Customs territory
1. The customs territory of the Union shall comprise the following territories, including their territorial waters, internal waters and airspace: — the territory of the Kingdom of Belgium, — the territory of the Republic of Bulgaria, — the territory of the Czech Republic, — the territory of the Kingdom of Denmark, except the Faroe Islands and Greenland, — the territory of the Federal Republic of Germany, except the Island of Heligoland and the territory of Büsingen (Treaty of 23 November 1964 between the Federal Republic of Germany and the Swiss Confederation), — the territory of the Republic of Estonia, — the territory of Ireland, — the territory of the Hellenic Republic, — the territory of the Kingdom of Spain, except Ceuta and Melilla, — the territory of the French Republic, except the French overseas countries and territories to which the provisions of Part Four of the TFEU apply, — the territory of the Republic of Croatia, — the territory of the Italian Republic, except the municipalities of Livigno and Campione d'Italia and the national waters of Lake Lugano which are between the bank and the political frontier of the area between Ponte Tresa and Porto Ceresio, — the territory of the Republic of Cyprus, in accordance with the provisions of the 2003 Act of Accession, — the territory of the Republic of Latvia, — the territory of the Republic of Lithuania, — the territory of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, — the territory of Hungary, — the territory of Malta, — the territory of the Kingdom of the Netherlands in Europe, — the territory of the Republic of Austria, — the territory of the Republic of Poland, — the territory of the Portuguese Republic, — the territory of Romania, — the territory of the Republic of Slovenia, — the territory of the Slovak Republic, — the territory of the Republic of Finland, — the territory of the Kingdom of Sweden, and — the territory of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and of the Channel Islands and the Isle of Man. 2. The following territories, including their territorial waters, internal waters and airspace, situated outside the territory of the Member States shall, taking into account the conventions and treaties applicable to them, be considered to be part of the customs territory of the Union: (a) FRANCE The territory of Monaco as defined in the Customs Convention signed in Paris on 18 May 1963 (Journal officiel de la République française (Official Journal of the French Republic) of 27 September 1963, p. 8679); (a) FRANCE The territory of Monaco as defined in the Customs Convention signed in Paris on 18 May 1963 (Journal officiel de la République française (Official Journal of the French Republic) of 27 September 1963, p. 8679); (b) CYPRUS The territory of the United Kingdom Sovereign Base Areas of Akrotiri and Dhekelia as defined in the Treaty concerning the Establishment of the Republic of Cyprus, signed in Nicosia on 16 August 1960 (United Kingdom Treaty Series No 4 (1961) Cmnd. 1252). (b) CYPRUS The territory of the United Kingdom Sovereign Base Areas of Akrotiri and Dhekelia as defined in the Treaty concerning the Establishment of the Republic of Cyprus, signed in Nicosia on 16 August 1960 (United Kingdom Treaty Series No 4 (1961) Cmnd. 1252).
Amendment rationale: CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL Reasons for and objectives of the proposal Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 October 2013 laying down the Union Customs Code (UCC) 1 aims at facilitating legitimate trade while ensuring appropriate customs supervision and the fight against fraud. The UCC entered into force on 30 October 2013, but it applies in its entirety from 1 May 2016. This proposal aims at modifying Article 136 UCC in order to ensure the effective application of other UCC provisions, notably those on customs supervision. This amendment should enter into force as soon as possible so as to contribute to effective customs supervision. With a view to facilitating trade flows, Article 136 UCC states that certain provisions (in particular those governing the obligations to lodge the entry summary declaration, to notify the arrival of a sea-going vessel or an aircraft, to convey and present the goods to customs upon unloading or transhipment and to wait authorisation before unloading or transhipping the goods, and those governing temporary storage) do not apply to goods that have temporarily left the Union customs territory while moving by direct route between two points of that territory by sea or air without a stop outside the Union. However, the disapplication of those provisions may put at risk the effective customs supervision of these goods. Article 136 UCC does not eliminate the requirement laid down in Article 134 UCC for goods brought into the customs territory of the Union to be subject to customs supervision and, where appropriate, to customs controls. However, the current text of Article 136 has the consequence that there is no clear legal basis to require presentation of these goods to the customs authorities. In the absence of such presentation, the supervision by the customs authorities of non-Union goods and of Union goods whose status must be proven may become more difficult. The customs authorities in these subsequent ports or airports must have the opportunity to ensure the complete and correct levying of import duty and other charges, or the correct application of non-fiscal measures (e.g. veterinary or phytosanitary controls) as well as identifying risks on goods arriving in their ports or airports. In order to ensure the proper application of other UCC provisions, notably those on customs supervision, it is therefore indispensable to propose a modification to the scope of Article 136 UCC, distinguishing between non-Union and Union goods, as follows: (1) First, the only provisions not applying when non-Union goods re-enter the Union customs territory after having temporarily left it by direct sea or air route, should be: (1) The rules governing the obligation to lodge the entry summary declaration (Articles 127 to 130 UCC) and (2) The rules governing the obligation to notify the arrival of a sea-going vessel or aircraft to the customs office of first entry to the Union customs territory (Article 133 UCC). (3) By contrast, the provisions governing the obligation to convey the goods to a certain place, to present them to customs upon unloading or transhipment, to wait for authorisation before unloading or transhipping, and the provisions on temporary storage should apply in these situations, thereby allowing appropriate customs supervision. (2) Second, the situation should be similar for Union goods whose status needs to be proven pursuant to Article 153(2) UCC, to the extent that the customs authorities must be able to check the proof of their Union status. (3) Third, the rules not applying to Union goods that have retained their status by virtue of Article 155(2) UCC can in addition include the rules governing the obligation to present the goods to customs upon unloading or transhipment, and the obligation to wait for authorisation before unloading or transhipping the goods (139 to 140 UCC). This is due to the fact that, even if the goods have temporarily left the Union customs territory, their status has not been altered and does not need to be proven. (4) Finally, certain references should be deleted from Article 136 UCC, as follows: (1) The reference to Articles 135(1) and 137 UCC should be deleted from because the goods should be conveyed to certain places designated by the customs authorities in any event; (2) The reference to Article 141 UCC should be deleted because Article 141(1) should continue to be applicable to goods moved under the transit procedure when they re-enter the customs Union. (3) The reference to Articles 144 to 149 UCC should be deleted because the provisions on temporary storage do not apply to Union goods in any event and their application for non-Union goods was excluded by mistake. 
Revised version (Article 4 Customs territory):
1. The customs territory of the Union shall comprise the following territories, including their territorial waters, internal waters and airspace: — the territory of the Kingdom of Belgium, — the territory of the Republic of Bulgaria, — the territory of the Czech Republic, — the territory of the Kingdom of Denmark, except the Faroe Islands and Greenland, — the territory of the Federal Republic of Germany, except the Island of Heligoland and the territory of Büsingen (Treaty of 23 November 1964 between the Federal Republic of Germany and the Swiss Confederation), — the territory of the Republic of Estonia, — the territory of Ireland, — the territory of the Hellenic Republic, — the territory of the Kingdom of Spain, except Ceuta and Melilla, — the territory of the French Republic, except the French overseas countries and territories to which the provisions of Part Four of the TFEU apply, — the territory of the Republic of Croatia, — the territory of the Italian Republic, except the municipalities of Livigno and Campione d'Italia and the national waters of Lake Lugano which are between the bank and the political frontier of the area between Ponte Tresa and Porto Ceresio, — the territory of the Republic of Cyprus, in accordance with the provisions of the 2003 Act of Accession, — the territory of the Republic of Latvia, — the territory of the Republic of Lithuania, — the territory of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, — the territory of Hungary, — the territory of Malta, — the territory of the Kingdom of the Netherlands in Europe, — the territory of the Republic of Austria, — the territory of the Republic of Poland, — the territory of the Portuguese Republic, — the territory of Romania, — the territory of the Republic of Slovenia, — the territory of the Slovak Republic, — the territory of the Republic of Finland, — the territory of the Kingdom of Sweden, and — the territory of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and of the Channel Islands and the Isle of Man. 2. The following territories, including their territorial waters, internal waters and airspace, situated outside the territory of the Member States shall, taking into account the conventions and treaties applicable to them, be considered to be part of the customs territory of the Union: (a) FRANCE The territory of Monaco as defined in the Customs Convention signed in Paris on 18 May 1963 (Journal officiel de la République française (Official Journal of the French Republic) of 27 September 1963, p. 8679); (b) CYPRUS The territory of the United Kingdom Sovereign Base Areas of Akrotiri and Dhekelia as defined in the Treaty concerning the Establishment of the Republic of Cyprus, signed in Nicosia on 16 August 1960 (United Kingdom Treaty Series No 4 (1961) Cmnd. 1252).
Article 5 Definitions
For the purposes of the Code, the following definitions shall apply: (1) "customs authorities" means the customs administrations of the Member States responsible for applying the customs legislation and any other authorities empowered under national law to apply certain customs legislation; (2) "customs legislation" means the body of legislation made up of all of the following: (a) the Code and the provisions supplementing or implementing it adopted at Union or national level; (b) the Common Customs Tariff; (c) the legislation setting up a Union system of reliefs from customs duty; (d) international agreements containing customs provisions, insofar as they are applicable in the Union; (2) "customs legislation" means the body of legislation made up of all of the following: (a) the Code and the provisions supplementing or implementing it adopted at Union or national level; (b) the Common Customs Tariff; (c) the legislation setting up a Union system of reliefs from customs duty; (d) international agreements containing customs provisions, insofar as they are applicable in the Union; (3) "customs controls" means specific acts performed by the customs authorities in order to ensure compliance with the customs legislation and other legislation governing the entry, exit, transit, movement, storage and end-use of goods moved between the customs territory of the Union and countries or territories outside that territory, and the presence and movement within the customs territory of the Union of non-Union goods and goods placed under the end-use procedure; (4) "person" means a natural person, a legal person, and any association of persons which is not a legal person but which is recognised under Union or national law as having the capacity to perform legal acts; (5) "economic operator" means a person who, in the course of his or her business, is involved in activities covered by the customs legislation; (6) "customs representative" means any person appointed by another person to carry out the acts and formalities required under the customs legislation in his or her dealings with customs authorities; (7) "risk" means the likelihood and the impact of an event occurring, with regard to the entry, exit, transit, movement or end-use of goods moved between the customs territory of the Union and countries or territories outside that territory and to the presence within the customs territory of the Union of non-Union goods, which would: (a) prevent the correct application of Union or national measures; (b) compromise the financial interests of the Union and its Member States; or (c) pose a threat to the security and safety of the Union and its residents, to human, animal or plant health, to the environment or to consumers; (7) "risk" means the likelihood and the impact of an event occurring, with regard to the entry, exit, transit, movement or end-use of goods moved between the customs territory of the Union and countries or territories outside that territory and to the presence within the customs territory of the Union of non-Union goods, which would: (a) prevent the correct application of Union or national measures; (b) compromise the financial interests of the Union and its Member States; or (c) pose a threat to the security and safety of the Union and its residents, to human, animal or plant health, to the environment or to consumers; (8) "customs formalities" means all the operations which must be carried out by a person and by the customs authorities in order to comply with the customs legislation; (9) "entry summary declaration" means the act whereby a person informs the customs authorities, in the prescribed form and manner and within a specific time-limit, that goods are to be brought into the customs territory of the Union; (10) "exit summary declaration" means the act whereby a person informs the customs authorities, in the prescribed form and manner and within a specific time-limit, that goods are to be taken out of the customs territory of the Union; (11) "temporary storage declaration" means the act whereby a person indicates, in the prescribed form and manner, that goods are in temporary storage; (12) "customs declaration" means the act whereby a person indicates, in the prescribed form and manner, a wish to place goods under a given customs procedure, with an indication, where appropriate, of any specific arrangements to be applied; (13) "re-export declaration" means the act whereby a person indicates, in the prescribed form and manner, a wish to take non-Union goods, with the exception of those under the free zone procedure or in temporary storage, out of the customs territory of the Union; (14) "re-export notification" means the act whereby a person indicates, in the prescribed form and manner, a wish to take non-Union goods which are under the free zone procedure or in temporary storage out of the customs territory of the Union; (15) "declarant" means the person lodging a customs declaration, a temporary storage declaration, an entry summary declaration, an exit summary declaration, a re-export declaration or a re-export notification in his or her own name or the person in whose name such a declaration or notification is lodged; (16) "customs procedure" means any of the following procedures under which goods may be placed in accordance with the Code: (a) release for free circulation; (b) special procedures; (c) export; (16) "customs procedure" means any of the following procedures under which goods may be placed in accordance with the Code: (a) release for free circulation; (b) special procedures; (c) export; (17) 'temporary storage' means the situation of non-Union goods temporarily stored under customs supervision in the period between their presentation to customs and their placing under a customs procedure or re-export; (18) "customs debt" means the obligation on a person to pay the amount of import or export duty which applies to specific goods under the customs legislation in force; (19) "debtor" means any person liable for a customs debt; (20) "import duty" means customs duty payable on the import of goods; (21) "export duty" means customs duty payable on the export of goods; (22) "customs status" means the status of goods as Union or non-Union goods; (23) "Union goods" means goods which fall into any of the following categories: (a) goods wholly obtained in the customs territory of the Union and not incorporating goods imported from countries or territories outside the customs territory of the Union; (b) goods brought into the customs territory of the Union from countries or territories outside that territory and released for free circulation; (c) goods obtained or produced in the customs territory of the Union, either solely from goods referred to in point (b) or from goods referred to in points (a) and (b); (23) "Union goods" means goods which fall into any of the following categories: (a) goods wholly obtained in the customs territory of the Union and not incorporating goods imported from countries or territories outside the customs territory of the Union; (b) goods brought into the customs territory of the Union from countries or territories outside that territory and released for free circulation; (c) goods obtained or produced in the customs territory of the Union, either solely from goods referred to in point (b) or from goods referred to in points (a) and (b); (24) "non-Union goods" means goods other than those referred to in point 23 or which have lost their customs status as Union goods; (25) "risk management" means the systematic identification of risk, including through random checks, and the implementation of all measures necessary for limiting exposure to risk; (26) "release of goods" means the act whereby the customs authorities make goods available for the purposes specified for the customs procedure under which they are placed; (27) "customs supervision" means action taken in general by the customs authorities with a view to ensuring that customs legislation and, where appropriate, other provisions applicable to goods subject to such action are observed; (28) "repayment" means the refunding of an amount of import or export duty that has been paid; (29) "remission" means the waiving of the obligation to pay an amount of import or export duty which has not been paid; (30) "processed products" means goods placed under a processing procedure which have undergone processing operations; (31) "person established in the customs territory of the Union" means: (a) in the case of a natural person, any person who has his or her habitual residence in the customs territory of the Union; (b) in the case of a legal person or an association of persons, any person having its registered office, central headquarters or a permanent business establishment in the customs territory of the Union; (31) "person established in the customs territory of the Union" means: (a) in the case of a natural person, any person who has his or her habitual residence in the customs territory of the Union; (b) in the case of a legal person or an association of persons, any person having its registered office, central headquarters or a permanent business establishment in the customs territory of the Union; (32) "permanent business establishment" means a fixed place of business, where both the necessary human and technical resources are permanently present and through which a person's customs-related operations are wholly or partly carried out; (33) "presentation of goods to customs" means the notification to the customs authorities of the arrival of goods at the customs office or at any other place designated or approved by the customs authorities and the availability of those goods for customs controls; (34) "holder of the goods" means the person who is the owner of the goods or who has a similar right of disposal over them or who has physical control of them; (35) "holder of the procedure" means: (a) the person who lodges the customs declaration, or on whose behalf that declaration is lodged; or (b) the person to whom the rights and obligations in respect of a customs procedure have been transferred; (35) "holder of the procedure" means: (a) the person who lodges the customs declaration, or on whose behalf that declaration is lodged; or (b) the person to whom the rights and obligations in respect of a customs procedure have been transferred; (36) "commercial policy measures" means non-tariff measures established, as part of the common commercial policy, in the form of Union provisions governing international trade in goods; (37) "processing operations" means any of the following: (a) the working of goods, including erecting or assembling them or fitting them to other goods; (b) the processing of goods; (c) the destruction of goods; (d) the repair of goods, including restoring them and putting them in order; (e) the use of goods which are not to be found in the processed products, but which allow or facilitate the production of those products, even if they are entirely or partially used up in the process (production accessories); (37) "processing operations" means any of the following: (a) the working of goods, including erecting or assembling them or fitting them to other goods; (b) the processing of goods; (c) the destruction of goods; (d) the repair of goods, including restoring them and putting them in order; (e) the use of goods which are not to be found in the processed products, but which allow or facilitate the production of those products, even if they are entirely or partially used up in the process (production accessories); (38) "rate of yield" means the quantity or percentage of processed products obtained from the processing of a given quantity of goods placed under a processing procedure; (39) "decision" means any act by the customs authorities pertaining to the customs legislation giving a ruling on a particular case, and having legal effects on the person or persons concerned; (40) "carrier" means: (a) in the context of entry, the person who brings the goods, or who assumes responsibility for the carriage of the goods, into the customs territory of the Union. However, (i) in the case of combined transportation, "carrier" means the person who operates the means of transport which, once brought into the customs territory of the Union, moves by itself as an active means of transport; (ii) in the case of maritime or air traffic under a vessel-sharing or contracting arrangement, "carrier" means the person who concludes a contract and issues a bill of lading or air waybill for the actual carriage of the goods into the customs territory of the Union; (b) in the context of exit, the person who takes the goods, or who assumes responsibility for the carriage of the goods, out of the customs territory of the Union. However: (i) in the case of combined transportation, where the active means of transport leaving the customs territory of the Union is only transporting another means of transport which, after the arrival of the active means of transport at its destination, will move by itself as an active means of transport, 'carrier' means the person who will operate the means of transport which will move by itself once the means of transport leaving the customs territory of the Union has arrived at its destination; (ii) in the case of maritime or air traffic under a vessel-sharing or contracting arrangement, "carrier" means the person who concludes a contract, and issues a bill of lading or air waybill, for the actual carriage of the goods out of the customs territory of the Union; (40) "carrier" means: (a) in the context of entry, the person who brings the goods, or who assumes responsibility for the carriage of the goods, into the customs territory of the Union. However, (i) in the case of combined transportation, "carrier" means the person who operates the means of transport which, once brought into the customs territory of the Union, moves by itself as an active means of transport; (ii) in the case of maritime or air traffic under a vessel-sharing or contracting arrangement, "carrier" means the person who concludes a contract and issues a bill of lading or air waybill for the actual carriage of the goods into the customs territory of the Union; (a) in the context of entry, the person who brings the goods, or who assumes responsibility for the carriage of the goods, into the customs territory of the Union. However, (i) in the case of combined transportation, "carrier" means the person who operates the means of transport which, once brought into the customs territory of the Union, moves by itself as an active means of transport; (ii) in the case of maritime or air traffic under a vessel-sharing or contracting arrangement, "carrier" means the person who concludes a contract and issues a bill of lading or air waybill for the actual carriage of the goods into the customs territory of the Union; (b) in the context of exit, the person who takes the goods, or who assumes responsibility for the carriage of the goods, out of the customs territory of the Union. However: (i) in the case of combined transportation, where the active means of transport leaving the customs territory of the Union is only transporting another means of transport which, after the arrival of the active means of transport at its destination, will move by itself as an active means of transport, 'carrier' means the person who will operate the means of transport which will move by itself once the means of transport leaving the customs territory of the Union has arrived at its destination; (ii) in the case of maritime or air traffic under a vessel-sharing or contracting arrangement, "carrier" means the person who concludes a contract, and issues a bill of lading or air waybill, for the actual carriage of the goods out of the customs territory of the Union; (b) in the context of exit, the person who takes the goods, or who assumes responsibility for the carriage of the goods, out of the customs territory of the Union. However: (i) in the case of combined transportation, where the active means of transport leaving the customs territory of the Union is only transporting another means of transport which, after the arrival of the active means of transport at its destination, will move by itself as an active means of transport, 'carrier' means the person who will operate the means of transport which will move by itself once the means of transport leaving the customs territory of the Union has arrived at its destination; (ii) in the case of maritime or air traffic under a vessel-sharing or contracting arrangement, "carrier" means the person who concludes a contract, and issues a bill of lading or air waybill, for the actual carriage of the goods out of the customs territory of the Union; (41) "buying commission" means a fee paid by an importer to an agent for representing him or her in the purchase of goods being valued.
Amendment rationale: CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL Reasons for and objectives of the proposal Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 October 2013 laying down the Union Customs Code (UCC) 1 aims at facilitating legitimate trade while ensuring appropriate customs supervision and the fight against fraud. The UCC entered into force on 30 October 2013, but it applies in its entirety from 1 May 2016. This proposal aims at modifying Article 136 UCC in order to ensure the effective application of other UCC provisions, notably those on customs supervision. This amendment should enter into force as soon as possible so as to contribute to effective customs supervision. With a view to facilitating trade flows, Article 136 UCC states that certain provisions (in particular those governing the obligations to lodge the entry summary declaration, to notify the arrival of a sea-going vessel or an aircraft, to convey and present the goods to customs upon unloading or transhipment and to wait authorisation before unloading or transhipping the goods, and those governing temporary storage) do not apply to goods that have temporarily left the Union customs territory while moving by direct route between two points of that territory by sea or air without a stop outside the Union. However, the disapplication of those provisions may put at risk the effective customs supervision of these goods. Article 136 UCC does not eliminate the requirement laid down in Article 134 UCC for goods brought into the customs territory of the Union to be subject to customs supervision and, where appropriate, to customs controls. However, the current text of Article 136 has the consequence that there is no clear legal basis to require presentation of these goods to the customs authorities. In the absence of such presentation, the supervision by the customs authorities of non-Union goods and of Union goods whose status must be proven may become more difficult. The customs authorities in these subsequent ports or airports must have the opportunity to ensure the complete and correct levying of import duty and other charges, or the correct application of non-fiscal measures (e.g. veterinary or phytosanitary controls) as well as identifying risks on goods arriving in their ports or airports. In order to ensure the proper application of other UCC provisions, notably those on customs supervision, it is therefore indispensable to propose a modification to the scope of Article 136 UCC, distinguishing between non-Union and Union goods, as follows: (1) First, the only provisions not applying when non-Union goods re-enter the Union customs territory after having temporarily left it by direct sea or air route, should be: (1) The rules governing the obligation to lodge the entry summary declaration (Articles 127 to 130 UCC) and (2) The rules governing the obligation to notify the arrival of a sea-going vessel or aircraft to the customs office of first entry to the Union customs territory (Article 133 UCC). (3) By contrast, the provisions governing the obligation to convey the goods to a certain place, to present them to customs upon unloading or transhipment, to wait for authorisation before unloading or transhipping, and the provisions on temporary storage should apply in these situations, thereby allowing appropriate customs supervision. (2) Second, the situation should be similar for Union goods whose status needs to be proven pursuant to Article 153(2) UCC, to the extent that the customs authorities must be able to check the proof of their Union status. (3) Third, the rules not applying to Union goods that have retained their status by virtue of Article 155(2) UCC can in addition include the rules governing the obligation to present the goods to customs upon unloading or transhipment, and the obligation to wait for authorisation before unloading or transhipping the goods (139 to 140 UCC). This is due to the fact that, even if the goods have temporarily left the Union customs territory, their status has not been altered and does not need to be proven. (4) Finally, certain references should be deleted from Article 136 UCC, as follows: (1) The reference to Articles 135(1) and 137 UCC should be deleted from because the goods should be conveyed to certain places designated by the customs authorities in any event; (2) The reference to Article 141 UCC should be deleted because Article 141(1) should continue to be applicable to goods moved under the transit procedure when they re-enter the customs Union. (3) The reference to Articles 144 to 149 UCC should be deleted because the provisions on temporary storage do not apply to Union goods in any event and their application for non-Union goods was excluded by mistake. 
Revised version (Article 5 Definitions):
For the purposes of the Code, the following definitions shall apply: (1) "customs authorities" means the customs administrations of the Member States responsible for applying the customs legislation and any other authorities empowered under national law to apply certain customs legislation; (2) "customs legislation" means the body of legislation made up of all of the following: (a) the Code and the provisions supplementing or implementing it adopted at Union or national level; (b) the Common Customs Tariff; (c) the legislation setting up a Union system of reliefs from customs duty; (d) international agreements containing customs provisions, insofar as they are applicable in the Union; (3) "customs controls" means specific acts performed by the customs authorities in order to ensure compliance with the customs legislation and other legislation governing the entry, exit, transit, movement, storage and end-use of goods moved between the customs territory of the Union and countries or territories outside that territory, and the presence and movement within the customs territory of the Union of non-Union goods and goods placed under the end-use procedure; (4) "person" means a natural person, a legal person, and any association of persons which is not a legal person but which is recognised under Union or national law as having the capacity to perform legal acts; (5) "economic operator" means a person who, in the course of his or her business, is involved in activities covered by the customs legislation; (6) "customs representative" means any person appointed by another person to carry out the acts and formalities required under the customs legislation in his or her dealings with customs authorities; (7) "risk" means the likelihood and the impact of an event occurring, with regard to the entry, exit, transit, movement or end-use of goods moved between the customs territory of the Union and countries or territories outside that territory and to the presence within the customs territory of the Union of non-Union goods, which would: (a) prevent the correct application of Union or national measures; (b) compromise the financial interests of the Union and its Member States; or (c) pose a threat to the security and safety of the Union and its residents, to human, animal or plant health, to the environment or to consumers; (8) "customs formalities" means all the operations which must be carried out by a person and by the customs authorities in order to comply with the customs legislation; (9) "entry summary declaration" means the act whereby a person informs the customs authorities, in the prescribed form and manner and within a specific time-limit, that goods are to be brought into the customs territory of the Union; (10) "exit summary declaration" means the act whereby a person informs the customs authorities, in the prescribed form and manner and within a specific time-limit, that goods are to be taken out of the customs territory of the Union; (11) "temporary storage declaration" means the act whereby a person indicates, in the prescribed form and manner, that goods are in temporary storage; (12) "customs declaration" means the act whereby a person indicates, in the prescribed form and manner, a wish to place goods under a given customs procedure, with an indication, where appropriate, of any specific arrangements to be applied; (13) "re-export declaration" means the act whereby a person indicates, in the prescribed form and manner, a wish to take non-Union goods, with the exception of those under the free zone procedure or in temporary storage, out of the customs territory of the Union; (14) "re-export notification" means the act whereby a person indicates, in the prescribed form and manner, a wish to take non-Union goods which are under the free zone procedure or in temporary storage out of the customs territory of the Union; (15) "declarant" means the person lodging a customs declaration, a temporary storage declaration, an entry summary declaration, an exit summary declaration, a re-export declaration or a re-export notification in his or her own name or the person in whose name such a declaration or notification is lodged; (16) "customs procedure" means any of the following procedures under which goods may be placed in accordance with the Code: (a) release for free circulation; (b) special procedures; (c) export; (17) 'temporary storage' means the situation of non-Union goods temporarily stored under customs supervision in the period between their presentation to customs and their placing under a customs procedure or re-export; (18) "customs debt" means the obligation on a person to pay the amount of import or export duty which applies to specific goods under the customs legislation in force; (19) "debtor" means any person liable for a customs debt; (20) "import duty" means customs duty payable on the import of goods; (21) "export duty" means customs duty payable on the export of goods; (22) "customs status" means the status of goods as Union or non-Union goods; (23) "Union goods" means goods which fall into any of the following categories: (a) goods wholly obtained in the customs territory of the Union and not incorporating goods imported from countries or territories outside the customs territory of the Union; (b) goods brought into the customs territory of the Union from countries or territories outside that territory and released for free circulation; (c) goods obtained or produced in the customs territory of the Union, either solely from goods referred to in point (b) or from goods referred to in points (a) and (b); (24) "non-Union goods" means goods other than those referred to in point 23 or which have lost their customs status as Union goods; (25) "risk management" means the systematic identification of risk, including through random checks, and the implementation of all measures necessary for limiting exposure to risk; (26) "release of goods" means the act whereby the customs authorities make goods available for the purposes specified for the customs procedure under which they are placed; (27) "customs supervision" means action taken in general by the customs authorities with a view to ensuring that customs legislation and, where appropriate, other provisions applicable to goods subject to such action are observed; (28) "repayment" means the refunding of an amount of import or export duty that has been paid; (29) "remission" means the waiving of the obligation to pay an amount of import or export duty which has not been paid; (30) "processed products" means goods placed under a processing procedure which have undergone processing operations; (31) "person established in the customs territory of the Union" means: (a) in the case of a natural person, any person who has his or her habitual residence in the customs territory of the Union; (b) in the case of a legal person or an association of persons, any person having its registered office, central headquarters or a permanent business establishment in the customs territory of the Union; (32) "permanent business establishment" means a fixed place of business, where both the necessary human and technical resources are permanently present and through which a person's customs-related operations are wholly or partly carried out; (33) "presentation of goods to customs" means the notification to the customs authorities of the arrival of goods at the customs office or at any other place designated or approved by the customs authorities and the availability of those goods for customs controls; (34) "holder of the goods" means the person who is the owner of the goods or who has a similar right of disposal over them or who has physical control of them; (35) "holder of the procedure" means: (a) the person who lodges the customs declaration, or on whose behalf that declaration is lodged; or (b) the person to whom the rights and obligations in respect of a customs procedure have been transferred; (36) "commercial policy measures" means non-tariff measures established, as part of the common commercial policy, in the form of Union provisions governing international trade in goods; (37) "processing operations" means any of the following: (a) the working of goods, including erecting or assembling them or fitting them to other goods; (b) the processing of goods; (c) the destruction of goods; (d) the repair of goods, including restoring them and putting them in order; (e) the use of goods which are not to be found in the processed products, but which allow or facilitate the production of those products, even if they are entirely or partially used up in the process (production accessories); (38) "rate of yield" means the quantity or percentage of processed products obtained from the processing of a given quantity of goods placed under a processing procedure; (39) "decision" means any act by the customs authorities pertaining to the customs legislation giving a ruling on a particular case, and having legal effects on the person or persons concerned; (40) "carrier" means: (a) in the context of entry, the person who brings the goods, or who assumes responsibility for the carriage of the goods, into the customs territory of the Union. However, (i) in the case of combined transportation, "carrier" means the person who operates the means of transport which, once brought into the customs territory of the Union, moves by itself as an active means of transport; (ii) in the case of maritime or air traffic under a vessel-sharing or contracting arrangement, "carrier" means the person who concludes a contract and issues a bill of lading or air waybill for the actual carriage of the goods into the customs territory of the Union; (b) in the context of exit, the person who takes the goods, or who assumes responsibility for the carriage of the goods, out of the customs territory of the Union. However: (i) in the case of combined transportation, where the active means of transport leaving the customs territory of the Union is only transporting another means of transport which, after the arrival of the active means of transport at its destination, will move by itself as an active means of transport, 'carrier' means the person who will operate the means of transport which will move by itself once the means of transport leaving the customs territory of the Union has arrived at its destination; (ii) in the case of maritime or air traffic under a vessel-sharing or contracting arrangement, "carrier" means the person who concludes a contract, and issues a bill of lading or air waybill, for the actual carriage of the goods out of the customs territory of the Union; (41) "buying commission" means a fee paid by an importer to an agent for representing him or her in the purchase of goods being valued.
Article 6 Means for the exchange and storage of information and common data requirements
1. All exchanges of information, such as declarations, applications or decisions, between customs authorities and between economic operators and customs authorities, and the storage of such information, as required under the customs legislation, shall be made using electronic data-processing techniques. 2. Common data requirements shall be drawn up for the purpose of the exchange and storage of information referred to in paragraph 1. 3. Means for the exchange and storage of information, other than the electronic data-processing techniques referred to in paragraph 1, may be used as follows: (a) on a permanent basis where duly justified by the type of traffic or where the use of electronic data-processing techniques is not appropriate for the customs formalities concerned; (b) on a temporary basis, in the event of a temporary failure of the computerised system of the customs authorities or of the economic operators. 4. By way of derogation from paragraph 1, the Commission may adopt in exceptional cases decisions allowing one or several Member States to use means for the exchange and storage of information other than electronic data-processing techniques. Such a decision on a derogation shall be justified by the specific situation of the Member State requesting it and the derogation shall be granted for a specific period of time. The derogation shall be reviewed periodically and may be extended for further specific periods of time upon further application by the Member State to which it is addressed. It shall be revoked where no longer justified. The derogation shall not affect the exchange of information between the Member State to which it is addressed and other Member States nor the exchange and storage of information in other Member States for the purpose of the application of the customs legislation.
Article 7 Delegation of power
The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts, in accordance with Article 284, in order to determine the following: (a) the common data requirements referred to in Article 6(2), taking into account the need to accomplish the customs formalities laid down in the customs legislation and the nature and purpose of the exchange and storage of information referred to in Article 6(1); (b) the specific cases where means for the exchange and storage of information, other than electronic data-processing techniques, may be used in accordance with point (a) of Article 6(3); (c) the type of information and the particulars that are to be contained in the records referred to in Articles 148(4) and 214(1).
Article 8 Conferral of implementing powers
1. The Commission shall specify, by means of implementing acts: (a) where necessary, the format and code of the common data requirements referred to in Article 6(2); (b) the procedural rules on the exchange and storage of information which can be made by means other than the electronic data-processing techniques referred to in Article 6(3). Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 285(4). 2. The Commission shall adopt the decisions on derogations referred to in Article 6(4) by means of implementing acts. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the advisory procedure referred to in Article 285(2).
Article 9 Registration
1. Economic operators established in the customs territory of the Union shall register with the customs authorities responsible for the place where they are established. 2. In specific cases, economic operators which are not established in the customs territory of the Union shall register with the customs authorities responsible for the place where they first lodge a declaration or apply for a decision. 3. Persons other than economic operators shall not be required to register with the customs authorities unless otherwise provided. Where persons referred to in the first subparagraph are required to register, the following shall apply: (a) where they are established in the customs territory of the Union, they shall register with the customs authorities responsible for the place where they are established; (b) where they are not established in the customs territory of the Union, they shall register with the customs authorities responsible for the place where they first lodge a declaration or apply for a decision. 4. In specific cases, the customs authorities shall invalidate the registration.
Article 10 Delegation of power
The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 284, in order to determine: (a) the cases referred to in Article 9(2), where economic operators which are not established in the customs territory of the Union are required to register with the customs authorities; (b) the cases referred to in the first subparagraph of Article 9(3), where persons other than economic operators are required to register with the customs authorities; (c) the cases referred to in Article 9(4) where the customs authorities invalidate a registration.
Article 11 Conferral of implementing powers
The Commission shall specify, by means of implementing acts, the customs authority responsible for the registration referred to in Article 9. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 285(4).
Article 12 Communication of information and data protection
1. All information acquired by the customs authorities in the course of performing their duty which is by its nature confidential or which is provided on a confidential basis shall be covered by the obligation of professional secrecy. Except as provided for in Article 47(2), such information shall not be disclosed by the competent authorities without the express permission of the person or authority that provided it. Such information may, however, be disclosed without permission where the customs authorities are obliged or authorised to do so pursuant to the provisions in force, particularly in respect of data protection, or in connection with legal proceedings. 2. Confidential information referred to in paragraph 1 may be communicated to the customs authorities and other competent authorities of countries or territories outside the customs territory of the Union for the purpose of customs cooperation with those countries or territories in the framework of an international agreement or Union legislation in the area of the common commercial policy. 3. Any disclosure or communication of information as referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2 shall ensure an adequate level of data protection in full compliance with data protection provisions in force.
Article 13 Exchange of additional information between customs authorities and economic operators
1. Customs authorities and economic operators may exchange any information not specifically required under the customs legislation, in particular for the purpose of mutual cooperation in the identification and counteraction of risk. That exchange may take place under a written agreement and may include access to the computer systems of economic operators by the customs authorities. 2. Any information provided by one party to the other in the course of the cooperation referred to in paragraph 1 shall be confidential unless both parties agree otherwise.
Article 14 Provision of information by the customs authorities
1. Any person may request information concerning the application of the customs legislation from the customs authorities. Such a request may be refused where it does not relate to an activity pertaining to international trade in goods that is actually envisaged. 2. Customs authorities shall maintain a regular dialogue with economic operators and other authorities involved in international trade in goods. They shall promote transparency by making the customs legislation, general administrative rulings and application forms freely available, wherever practical without charge, and through the Internet.
Article 15 Provision of information to the customs authorities
1. Any person directly or indirectly involved in the accomplishment of customs formalities or in customs controls shall, at the request of the customs authorities and within any time-limit specified, provide those authorities with all the requisite documents and information, in an appropriate form, and all the assistance necessary for the completion of those formalities or controls. 2. The lodging of a customs declaration, temporary storage declaration, entry summary declaration, exit summary declaration, re-export declaration or re-export notification by a person to the customs authorities, or the submission of an application for an authorisation or any other decision, shall render the person concerned responsible for all of the following: (a) the accuracy and completeness of the information given in the declaration, notification or application; (b) the authenticity, accuracy and validity of any document supporting the declaration, notification or application; (c) where applicable, compliance with all of the obligations relating to the placing of the goods in question under the customs procedure concerned, or to the conduct of the authorised operations. The first subparagraph shall also apply to the provision of any information in any other form required by, or given to, the customs authorities. Where the declaration or notification is lodged, the application is submitted, or information is provided, by a customs representative of the person concerned, as referred to in Article 18, that customs representative shall also be bound by the obligations set out in the first subparagraph of this paragraph.
Article 16 Electronic systems
1. Member States shall cooperate with the Commission to develop, maintain and employ electronic systems for the exchange of information between customs authorities and with the Commission and for the storage of such information, in accordance with the Code. 2. Member States to which a derogation has been granted in accordance with Article 6(4) shall not be required to develop, maintain and employ within the scope of that derogation the electronic systems referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article.
Article 17 Conferral of implementing powers
The Commission shall specify, by means of implementing acts, the technical arrangements for developing, maintaining and employing the electronic systems referred to in Article 16(1). Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 285(4).
Article 18 Customs representative
1. Any person may appoint a customs representative. Such representation may be either direct, in which case the customs representative shall act in the name of and on behalf of another person, or indirect, in which case the customs representative shall act in his or her own name but on behalf of another person. 2. A customs representative shall be established within the customs territory of the Union. Except where otherwise provided, that requirement shall be waived where the customs representative acts on behalf of persons who are not required to be established within the customs territory of the Union. 3. Member States may determine, in accordance with Union law, the conditions under which a customs representative may provide services in the Member State where he or she is established. However, without prejudice to the application of less stringent criteria by the Member State concerned, a customs representative who complies with the criteria laid down in points (a) to (d) of Article 39 shall be entitled to provide such services in a Member State other than the one where he or she is established. 4. Member States may apply the conditions determined in accordance with the first sentence of paragraph 3 to customs representatives not established within the customs territory of the Union.
Article 19 Empowerment
1. When dealing with the customs authorities, a customs representative shall state that he or she is acting on behalf of the person represented and shall specify whether the representation is direct or indirect. Persons who fail to state that they are acting as a customs representative or who state that they are acting as a customs representative without being empowered to do so shall be deemed to be acting in their own name and on their own behalf. 2. The customs authorities may require persons stating that they are acting as a customs representative to provide evidence of their empowerment by the person represented. In specific cases, the customs authorities shall not require such evidence to be provided. 3. The customs authorities shall not require a person acting as a customs representative, carrying out acts and formalities on a regular basis, to produce on every occasion evidence of empowerment, provided that such person is in a position to produce such evidence on request by the customs authorities.
Article 20 Delegation of power
The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts, in accordance with Article 284, in order to determine: (a) the cases where the waiver referred to in the second subparagraph of Article 18(2) does not apply; (b) the cases where the evidence of empowerment referred to in the first subparagraph of Article 19(2) is not required by the customs authorities.
Article 21 Conferral of implementing powers
The Commission shall specify, by means of implementing acts, the procedural rules on the conferral and proving of the entitlement referred to in Article 18(3). Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 285(4).
Article 22 Decisions taken upon application
1. Where a person applies for a decision relating to the application of the customs legislation, that person shall supply all the information required by the competent customs authorities in order to enable them to take that decision. A decision may also be applied for by, and taken with regard to, several persons, in accordance with the conditions laid down in the customs legislation. Except where otherwise provided, the competent customs authority shall be that of the place where the applicant's main accounts for customs purposes are held or accessible, and where at least part of the activities to be covered by the decision are to be carried out. 2. Customs authorities shall, without delay and at the latest within 30 days of receipt of the application for a decision, verify whether the conditions for the acceptance of that application are fulfilled. Where the customs authorities establish that the application contains all the information required in order for them to be able to take the decision, they shall communicate its acceptance to the applicant within the period specified in the first subparagraph. 3. The competent customs authority shall take a decision as referred to in paragraph 1, and shall notify the applicant without delay, and at the latest within 120 days of the date of acceptance of the application, except where otherwise provided Where the customs authorities are unable to comply with the time-limit for taking a decision, they shall inform the applicant of that fact before the expiry of that time-limit, stating the reasons and indicating the further period of time which they consider necessary in order to take a decision. Except where otherwise provided, that further period of time shall not exceed 30 days. Without prejudice to the second subparagraph, the customs authorities may extend the time-limit for taking a decision, as laid down in the customs legislation, where the applicant requests an extension to carry out adjustments in order to ensure the fulfilment of the conditions and criteria. Those adjustments and the further period of time necessary to carry them out shall be communicated to the customs authorities, which shall decide on the extension. 4. Except where otherwise specified in the decision or in the customs legislation, the decision shall take effect from the date on which the applicant receives it, or is deemed to have received it. Except in the cases provided for in Article 45(2), decisions adopted shall be enforceable by the customs authorities from that date. 5. Except where otherwise provided in the customs legislation, the decision shall be valid without limitation of time. 6. Before taking a decision which would adversely affect the applicant, the customs authorities shall communicate the grounds on which they intend to base their decision to the applicant, who shall be given the opportunity to express his or her point of view within a period prescribed from the date on which he or she receives that communication or is deemed to have received it. Following the expiry of that period, the applicant shall be notified, in the appropriate form, of the decision. The first subparagraph shall not apply in any of the following cases: (a) where it concerns a decision referred to in Article 33(1); (b) in the event of refusal of the benefit of a tariff quota where the specified tariff quota volume is reached, as referred to in the first subparagraph of Article 56(4); (c) where the nature or the level of a threat to the security and safety of the Union and its residents, to human, animal or plant health, to the environment or to consumers so requires; (d) where the decision aims at securing the implementation of another decision for which the first subparagraph has been applied, without prejudice to the law of the Member State concerned; (e) where it would prejudice investigations initiated for the purpose of combating fraud; (f) in other specific cases. 7. A decision which adversely affects the applicant shall set out the grounds on which it is based and shall refer to the right of appeal provided for in Article 44.
Article 23 Management of decisions taken upon application
1. The holder of the decision shall comply with the obligations resulting from that decision. 2. The holder of the decision shall inform the customs authorities without delay of any factor arising after the decision was taken, which may influence its continuation or content. 3. Without prejudice to provisions laid down in other fields which specify the cases in which decisions are invalid or become null and void, the customs authorities which took a decision may at any time annul, amend or revoke it where it does not conform to the customs legislation. 4. In specific cases the customs authorities shall carry out the following: (a) re-assess a decision; (b) suspend a decision which is not to be annulled, revoked or amended. 5. The customs authorities shall monitor the conditions and criteria to be fulfilled by the holder of a decision. They shall also monitor compliance with the obligations resulting from that decision. Where the holder of the decision has been established for less than three years, the customs authorities shall closely monitor it during the first year after the decision is taken.
Article 24 Delegation of power
The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 284, in order to determine: (a) the exceptions to the third subparagraph of Article 22(1); (b) the conditions for the acceptance of an application, referred to in Article 22(2); (c) the time-limit to take a specific decision, including the possible extension of that time-limit, in accordance with Article 22(3); (d) the cases, referred to in Article 22(4), where the decision takes effect from a date which is different from the date on which the applicant receives it or is deemed to have received it; (e) the cases, referred to in Article 22(5), where the decision is not valid without limitation of time; (f) the duration of the period referred to in the first subparagraph of Article 22(6); (g) the specific cases, referred to in point (f) of the second subparagraph of Article 22(6), where the applicant is given no opportunity to express his or her point of view; (h) the cases and the rules for re-assessing and suspending decisions in accordance with Article 23(4);
Article 25 Conferral of implementing powers
The Commission shall specify, by means of implementing acts, the procedural rules for: (a) the submission and the acceptance of the application for a decision, referred to in Article 22(1) and (2); (b) taking the decision referred to in Article 22, including, where appropriate, the consultation of the Member States concerned; (c) monitoring a decision, in accordance with Article 23(5). Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 285(4).
Article 26 Union-wide validity of decisions
Except where the effect of a decision is limited to one or several Member States, decisions relating to the application of the customs legislation shall be valid throughout the customs territory of the Union.
Article 27 Annulment of favourable decisions
1. The customs authorities shall annul a decision favourable to the holder of the decision if all the following conditions are fulfilled: (a) the decision was taken on the basis of incorrect or incomplete information; (b) the holder of the decision knew or ought reasonably to have known that the information was incorrect or incomplete; (c) if the information had been correct and complete, the decision would have been different. 2. The holder of the decision shall be notified of its annulment. 3. Annulment shall take effect from the date on which the initial decision took effect, unless otherwise specified in the decision in accordance with the customs legislation.
Article 28 Revocation and amendment of favourable decisions
1. A favourable decision shall be revoked or amended where, in cases other than those referred to in Article 27: (a) one or more of the conditions for taking that decision were not or are no longer fulfilled; or (b) upon application by the holder of the decision. 2. Except where otherwise provided, a favourable decision addressed to several persons may be revoked only in respect of a person who fails to fulfil an obligation imposed under that decision. 3. The holder of the decision shall be notified of its revocation or amendment. 4. Article 22(4) shall apply to the revocation or amendment of the decision. However, in exceptional cases where the legitimate interests of the holder of the decision so require, the customs authorities may defer the date on which revocation or amendment takes effect up to one year. That date shall be indicated in the revoking or amending decision.
Article 29 Decisions taken without prior application
Except when a customs authority acts as a judicial authority, Article 22(4), (5), (6) and (7), Article 23(3) and Articles 26, 27 and 28 shall also apply to decisions taken by the customs authorities without prior application by the person concerned.
Article 30 Limitations applicable to decisions on goods placed under a customs procedure or in temporary storage
Except where the person concerned so requests, the revocation, amendment or suspension of a favourable decision shall not affect goods which, at the moment where the revocation, amendment or suspension takes effect, have already been placed and are still under a customs procedure or in temporary storage by virtue of the revoked, amended or suspended decision.
Article 31 Delegation of power
The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts, in accordance with Article 284, in order to determine: (a) the cases, referred to in Article 28(2), where a favourable decision addressed to several persons may be revoked also in respect of persons other than the person who fails to fulfil an obligation imposed under that decision; (b) the exceptional cases, in which the customs authorities may defer the date on which revocation or amendment takes effect in accordance with the second subparagraph of Article 28(4).
Article 32 Conferral of implementing powers
The Commission shall specify, by means of implementing acts, the procedural rules for annulling, revoking or amending favourable decisions. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 285(4).
Article 33 Decisions relating to binding information
1. The customs authorities shall, upon application, take decisions relating to binding tariff information (BTI decisions), or decisions relating to binding origin information (BOI decisions). Such an application shall not be accepted in any of the following circumstances: (a) where the application is made, or has already been made, at the same or another customs office, by or on behalf of the holder of a decision in respect of the same goods and, for BOI decisions, under the same circumstances determining the acquisition of origin; (b) where the application does not relate to any intended use of the BTI or BOI decision or any intended use of a customs procedure. 2. BTI or BOI decisions shall be binding, only in respect of the tariff classification or determination of the origin of goods: (a) on the customs authorities, as against the holder of the decision, only in respect of goods for which customs formalities are completed after the date on which the decision takes effect; (b) on the holder of the decision, as against the customs authorities, only with effect from the date on which he or she receives, or is deemed to have received, notification of the decision. 3. BTI or BOI decisions shall be valid for a period of three years from the date on which the decision takes effect. 4. For the application of a BTI or BOI decision in the context of a particular customs procedure, the holder of the decision shall be able to prove that: (a) in the case of a BTI decision, the goods declared correspond in every respect to those described in the decision; (b) in the case of a BOI decision, the goods in question and the circumstances determining the acquisition of origin correspond in every respect to the goods and the circumstances described in the decision.
Article 34 Management of decisions relating to binding information
1. A BTI decision shall cease to be valid before the end of the period referred to in Article 33(3) where it no longer conforms to the law, as a result of either of the following: (a) the adoption of an amendment to the nomenclatures referred to in points (a) and (b) of Article 56(2); (b) the adoption of measures referred to in Article 57(4); with effect from the date of application of such amendment or measures. 2. A BOI decision shall cease to be valid before the end of the period referred to in Article 33(3) in any of the following cases: (a) where a regulation is adopted or an agreement is concluded by, and becomes applicable in, the Union, and the BOI decision no longer conforms to the law thereby laid down, with effect from the date of application of that regulation or agreement; (b) where it is no longer compatible with the Agreement on Rules of Origin established in the World Trade Organisation (WTO) or with the explanatory notes or an origin opinion adopted for the interpretation of that Agreement, with effect from the date of their publication in the Official Journal of the European Union . 3. BTI or BOI decisions shall not cease to be valid with retroactive effect. 4. By way of derogation from Article 23(3) and Article 27, BTI and BOI decisions shall be annulled where they are based on inaccurate or incomplete information from the applicants. 5. BTI and BOI decisions shall be revoked in accordance with Article 23(3) and Article 28. However, such decisions shall not be revoked upon application by the holder of the decision. 6. BTI and BOI decisions may not be amended. 7. The customs authorities shall revoke BTI decisions: (a) where they are no longer compatible with the interpretation of any of the nomenclatures referred to in points (a) and (b) of Article 56(2) resulting from any of the following: (i) explanatory notes referred to in the second indent of point (a) of Article 9(1) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff ( 1 ), with effect from the date of their publication in the Official Journal of the European Union ; (ii) a judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union, with effect from the date of publication of the operative part of the judgment in the Official Journal of the European Union ; (iii) classification decisions, classification opinions or amendments of the explanatory notes to the Nomenclature of the Harmonized Commodity Description and Coding System, adopted by the Organization set-up by the Convention establishing a Customs Co-operation Council, done at Brussels on 15 December 1950, with effect from the date of publication of the Commission Communication in the 'C' series of the Official Journal of the European Union ; or (a) where they are no longer compatible with the interpretation of any of the nomenclatures referred to in points (a) and (b) of Article 56(2) resulting from any of the following: (i) explanatory notes referred to in the second indent of point (a) of Article 9(1) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff ( 1 ), with effect from the date of their publication in the Official Journal of the European Union ; (ii) a judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union, with effect from the date of publication of the operative part of the judgment in the Official Journal of the European Union ; (iii) classification decisions, classification opinions or amendments of the explanatory notes to the Nomenclature of the Harmonized Commodity Description and Coding System, adopted by the Organization set-up by the Convention establishing a Customs Co-operation Council, done at Brussels on 15 December 1950, with effect from the date of publication of the Commission Communication in the 'C' series of the Official Journal of the European Union ; or (b) in other specific cases. 8. BOI decisions shall be revoked: (a) where they are no longer compatible with a judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union, with effect from the date of publication of the operative part of the judgment in the Official Journal of the European Union ; or 9. Where point (b) of paragraph 1 or paragraphs 2, 7 or 8 apply, a BTI or BOI decision may still be used in respect of binding contracts which were based upon that decision and were concluded before it ceased to be valid or was revoked. That extended use shall not apply where a BOI decision is taken for goods to be exported. The extended use referred to in the first subparagraph shall not exceed six months from the date on which the BTI or BOI decision ceases to be valid or is revoked. However, a measure referred to in Article 57(4) or in Article 67 may exclude that extended use or lay down a shorter period of time. In the case of products for which an import or export certificate is submitted when customs formalities are carried out, the period of six months shall be replaced by the period of validity of the certificate. In order to benefit from the extended use of a BTI or BOI decision, the holder of that decision shall lodge an application to the customs authority that took the decision within 30 days of the date on which it ceases to be valid or is revoked, indicating the quantities for which a period of extended use is requested and the Member State or Member States in which goods will be cleared under the period of extended use. That customs authority shall take a decision on the extended use and notify the holder, without delay, and at the latest within 30 days of the date on which it receives all the information required in order to enable it to take that decision. 10. The Commission shall notify the customs authorities where: (a) the taking of BTI and BOI decisions, for goods whose correct and uniform tariff classification or determination of origin is not ensured, is suspended; or (b) the suspension referred to in point (a) is withdrawn. 11. The Commission may adopt decisions requesting Member States to revoke BTI or BOI decisions, to ensure a correct and uniform tariff classification or determination of the origin of goods.
Amendment rationale: CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL Reasons for and objectives of the proposal Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 October 2013 laying down the Union Customs Code (UCC) 1 aims at facilitating legitimate trade while ensuring appropriate customs supervision and the fight against fraud. The UCC entered into force on 30 October 2013, but it applies in its entirety from 1 May 2016. This proposal aims at modifying Article 136 UCC in order to ensure the effective application of other UCC provisions, notably those on customs supervision. This amendment should enter into force as soon as possible so as to contribute to effective customs supervision. With a view to facilitating trade flows, Article 136 UCC states that certain provisions (in particular those governing the obligations to lodge the entry summary declaration, to notify the arrival of a sea-going vessel or an aircraft, to convey and present the goods to customs upon unloading or transhipment and to wait authorisation before unloading or transhipping the goods, and those governing temporary storage) do not apply to goods that have temporarily left the Union customs territory while moving by direct route between two points of that territory by sea or air without a stop outside the Union. However, the disapplication of those provisions may put at risk the effective customs supervision of these goods. Article 136 UCC does not eliminate the requirement laid down in Article 134 UCC for goods brought into the customs territory of the Union to be subject to customs supervision and, where appropriate, to customs controls. However, the current text of Article 136 has the consequence that there is no clear legal basis to require presentation of these goods to the customs authorities. In the absence of such presentation, the supervision by the customs authorities of non-Union goods and of Union goods whose status must be proven may become more difficult. The customs authorities in these subsequent ports or airports must have the opportunity to ensure the complete and correct levying of import duty and other charges, or the correct application of non-fiscal measures (e.g. veterinary or phytosanitary controls) as well as identifying risks on goods arriving in their ports or airports. In order to ensure the proper application of other UCC provisions, notably those on customs supervision, it is therefore indispensable to propose a modification to the scope of Article 136 UCC, distinguishing between non-Union and Union goods, as follows: (1) First, the only provisions not applying when non-Union goods re-enter the Union customs territory after having temporarily left it by direct sea or air route, should be: (1) The rules governing the obligation to lodge the entry summary declaration (Articles 127 to 130 UCC) and (2) The rules governing the obligation to notify the arrival of a sea-going vessel or aircraft to the customs office of first entry to the Union customs territory (Article 133 UCC). (3) By contrast, the provisions governing the obligation to convey the goods to a certain place, to present them to customs upon unloading or transhipment, to wait for authorisation before unloading or transhipping, and the provisions on temporary storage should apply in these situations, thereby allowing appropriate customs supervision. (2) Second, the situation should be similar for Union goods whose status needs to be proven pursuant to Article 153(2) UCC, to the extent that the customs authorities must be able to check the proof of their Union status. (3) Third, the rules not applying to Union goods that have retained their status by virtue of Article 155(2) UCC can in addition include the rules governing the obligation to present the goods to customs upon unloading or transhipment, and the obligation to wait for authorisation before unloading or transhipping the goods (139 to 140 UCC). This is due to the fact that, even if the goods have temporarily left the Union customs territory, their status has not been altered and does not need to be proven. (4) Finally, certain references should be deleted from Article 136 UCC, as follows: (1) The reference to Articles 135(1) and 137 UCC should be deleted from because the goods should be conveyed to certain places designated by the customs authorities in any event; (2) The reference to Article 141 UCC should be deleted because Article 141(1) should continue to be applicable to goods moved under the transit procedure when they re-enter the customs Union. (3) The reference to Articles 144 to 149 UCC should be deleted because the provisions on temporary storage do not apply to Union goods in any event and their application for non-Union goods was excluded by mistake. 
Revised version (Article 34 Management of decisions relating to binding information):
1. A BTI decision shall cease to be valid before the end of the period referred to in Article 33(3) where it no longer conforms to the law, as a result of either of the following: (a) the adoption of an amendment to the nomenclatures referred to in points (a) and (b) of Article 56(2); (b) the adoption of measures referred to in Article 57(4); with effect from the date of application of such amendment or measures. 2. A BOI decision shall cease to be valid before the end of the period referred to in Article 33(3) in any of the following cases: (a) where a regulation is adopted or an agreement is concluded by, and becomes applicable in, the Union, and the BOI decision no longer conforms to the law thereby laid down, with effect from the date of application of that regulation or agreement; (b) where it is no longer compatible with the Agreement on Rules of Origin established in the World Trade Organisation (WTO) or with the explanatory notes or an origin opinion adopted for the interpretation of that Agreement, with effect from the date of their publication in the Official Journal of the European Union . 3. BTI or BOI decisions shall not cease to be valid with retroactive effect. 4. By way of derogation from Article 23(3) and Article 27, BTI and BOI decisions shall be annulled where they are based on inaccurate or incomplete information from the applicants. 5. BTI and BOI decisions shall be revoked in accordance with Article 23(3) and Article 28. However, such decisions shall not be revoked upon application by the holder of the decision. 6. BTI and BOI decisions may not be amended. 7. The customs authorities shall revoke BTI decisions: (a) where they are no longer compatible with the interpretation of any of the nomenclatures referred to in points (a) and (b) of Article 56(2) resulting from any of the following: (i) explanatory notes referred to in the second indent of point (a) of Article 9(1) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff ( 1 ), with effect from the date of their publication in the Official Journal of the European Union ; (ii) a judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union, with effect from the date of publication of the operative part of the judgment in the Official Journal of the European Union ; (iii) classification decisions, classification opinions or amendments of the explanatory notes to the Nomenclature of the Harmonized Commodity Description and Coding System, adopted by the Organization set-up by the Convention establishing a Customs Co-operation Council, done at Brussels on 15 December 1950, with effect from the date of publication of the Commission Communication in the 'C' series of the Official Journal of the European Union ; or (b) in other specific cases. 8. BOI decisions shall be revoked: (a) where they are no longer compatible with a judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union, with effect from the date of publication of the operative part of the judgment in the Official Journal of the European Union ; or 9. Where point (b) of paragraph 1 or paragraphs 2, 7 or 8 apply, a BTI or BOI decision may still be used in respect of binding contracts which were based upon that decision and were concluded before it ceased to be valid or was revoked. That extended use shall not apply where a BOI decision is taken for goods to be exported. The extended use referred to in the first subparagraph shall not exceed six months from the date on which the BTI or BOI decision ceases to be valid or is revoked. However, a measure referred to in Article 57(4) or in Article 67 may exclude that extended use or lay down a shorter period of time. In the case of products for which an import or export certificate is submitted when customs formalities are carried out, the period of six months shall be replaced by the period of validity of the certificate. In order to benefit from the extended use of a BTI or BOI decision, the holder of that decision shall lodge an application to the customs authority that took the decision within 30 days of the date on which it ceases to be valid or is revoked, indicating the quantities for which a period of extended use is requested and the Member State or Member States in which goods will be cleared under the period of extended use. That customs authority shall take a decision on the extended use and notify the holder, without delay, and at the latest within 30 days of the date on which it receives all the information required in order to enable it to take that decision. 10. The Commission shall notify the customs authorities where: (a) the taking of BTI and BOI decisions, for goods whose correct and uniform tariff classification or determination of origin is not ensured, is suspended; or (b) the suspension referred to in point (a) is withdrawn. 11. The Commission may adopt decisions requesting Member States to revoke BTI or BOI decisions, to ensure a correct and uniform tariff classification or determination of the origin of goods.
Article 35 Decisions relating to binding information with regard to other factors
In specific cases, the customs authorities shall, upon application, take decisions relating to binding information with regard to other factors referred to in Title II, on the basis of which import or export duty and other measures in respect of trade in goods are applied.
Article 36 Delegation of power
The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts, in accordance with Article 284, in order to determine: (a) the specific cases referred to in point (b) of Article 34(7) and point (b) of Article 34(8), where BTI and BOI decisions are to be revoked; (b) the cases referred to in Article 35, where decisions relating to binding information are taken with regard to other factors on the basis of which import or export duty and other measures in respect of trade in goods are applied.
Amendment rationale: CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL Reasons for and objectives of the proposal The provisions of the Union Customs Code 1 (the Code) are being applied since 1 May 2016. A major goal of the Code is the shift to a complete use of electronic systems for interactions between economic operators and customs authorities, and between customs authorities, and the end of paper-based customs processes. The Code provides that different customs processes should be covered by electronic systems while also providing that the details of and planning for such systems should be set out in a separate Work Programme. The UCC Work Programme 2 draws up planning for seventeen UCC electronic systems in total, on the basis of the Multi-Annual Strategic Plan (MASP) for all electronic customs projects that is prepared and updated regularly in accordance with a 2008 Decision 3 of the European Parliament and the Council . The systems can be divided into two categories: (a) fourteen trans-European systems including some systems that have national components for development by the Member States and (b) three national systems that have to be developed or upgraded by the Member States alone. Article 278 of the Code provides that, until all the new electronic systems envisaged under the Code are operational, existing electronic and paper-based systems can continue to be used for customs processes. The Article establishes the end of 2020, at the latest, as the date by which the use of these transitional arrangements must cease. In line with this deadline, the Work Programme sets out step-by-step plans for completion of the work on the electronic systems by 2020. The Commission and the Member States are on track to finish the major part of the work on the electronic systems on time. In 2017 three of the seventeen systems were implemented and a first phase of another system was completed, all by their scheduled dates. In effect, close to eighty per cent of the Commission's work on the trans-European systems provided for under the Work Programme will be completed by that date. However, the last phases of development of IT systems are often the longest and therefore, while most systems will be completed by 2020, some will only be partially completed. There are many challenges for both the Commission and Member States in this work of implementing seventeen electronic systems. These challenges, that were impossible to predict at the time the deadline was set, include the following: · The unavoidable delay in completing the design of the electronic systems. When setting the 2020 deadline, it was anticipated that the rules supplementing and implementing the UCC (the UCC Delegated Regulation, 4 the UCC Implementing Regulation 5 and the UCC Transitional Delegated Regulation 6 ) would be adopted very soon after the adoption of the UCC in 2013, so that their provisions could be taken into account in developing the IT systems. However, as it happened, discussions took much longer than expected and the acts were only adopted in their final form in late 2015/early 2016. This delay meant a delay in producing the functional and technical specifications for many of the electronic systems. · The enormity of the work of interlinking seventeen electronic systems across the whole of the EU and the particular complexity of some of the electronic systems. These elements only became apparent as work started on the functional and technical specifications for the systems. Having the full picture following the work on the specifications has led the Commission and Member States to the conclusion that a revision of the target date for completion of the systems is necessary in some cases. This is particularly true for those electronic systems for which the specifications will only be completed in 2018. · Data harmonisation difficulties. Since the adoption of the Delegated Regulation and the Implementing Regulation, work is also proceeding at an intensive pace on harmonisation of the data provided by economic operators. This element is crucial for the interoperability of the different UCC electronic systems, for a harmonised application of the legal rules and for cooperation with other public services active at the border. Harmonising the data in line with international data models such as that of the World Customs Organisation also ensures better linkages with the IT systems of third countries and thus greatly facilitates trade. However, this work involves a much heavier than expected investment in terms of time and in financial terms in fully reprogramming some of the existing electronic systems. · Sequencing. When planning realistic timelines and costs, close attention must be paid to the impact of the proposed electronic changes on the customs and trade eco-system. As the electronic systems are closely interlinked, it is important to introduce them in the right order (sequencing) so as to ensure that interdependencies are respected and that the changes for administrations and trade are introduced in a structured and coherent manner. For all of these reasons, it has become necessary to provide for a later date (2025 at the latest) for full completion of work on some of the systems. This target date will ensure the smooth implementation by 2020 of the majority of the systems and the later implementation of the remaining systems, in proper sequence, on dates between 2021 and 2025. Half of the systems for which implementation is to be delayed already exist and are merely being upgraded under the UCC while the other half are new systems. The systems to be postponed are as follows: · Upgrades for which the main technical challenge is the harmonisation of data i.e. the upgrades of the Import Control System (ICS), the New Computerised Transit System (NCTS), the Automated Export System (AES) and the National Export System (including the export component of the national Special Procedures System); and · Three new systems which are designed to apply innovative features of the Code i.e. Centralised Clearance for Import (CCI), Proof of Union Status (PoUS) and Guarantee Management (GUM). The postponement to 2025 of the latest delivery date for these electronic systems conflicts with Article 278 of the Code which only allows the use of means for the exchange and storage of information other than the planned electronic systems until 2020. Therefore, the deadline in Article 278 must be extended in respect of the delayed systems. Furthermore, action must be taken quickly in order to ensure legal certainty; business and customs administrations would have serious problems if, by 2020, some of the electronic systems were not implemented and at the same time the law prohibited the continued transitional use of alternative arrangements. As Member States and businesses need on average two years to make arrangements for each electronic system, the Commission has to provide certainty by 2018 about the re-planning for some of the systems and the related extension of the applicability of transitional arrangements after 2020 up to 2025.
Revised version (Article 36 Delegation of power):
The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts, in accordance with Article 284, in order to determine: (b) the cases referred to in Article 35, where decisions relating to binding information are taken with regard to other factors on the basis of which import or export duty and other measures in respect of trade in goods are applied.
Article 37 Conferral of implementing powers
1. The Commission shall adopt, by means of implementing acts, the procedural rules for: (a) using a BTI or BOI decision after it ceases to be valid or is revoked, in accordance with Article 34(9); (b) the Commission to notify the customs authorities in accordance with points (a) and (b) of Article 34(10); (c) using decisions referred to in Article 35 and determined in accordance with point (b) of Article 36 after they cease to be valid; (d) suspending decisions referred to in Article 35 and determined in accordance with point (b) of Article 36 and notifying the suspension or the withdrawal of the suspension to the customs authorities. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 285(4). 2. The Commission shall adopt, by means of implementing acts, the decisions requesting Member States to revoke: (a) decisions referred to in Article 34(11); (b) decisions referred to in Article 35 and determined in accordance with point (b) of Article 36. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the advisory procedure referred to in Article 285(2). Where the opinion of the committee referred to in Article 285(1) is to be obtained by written procedure, Article 285(6) shall apply.
Amendment rationale: CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL Reasons for and objectives of the proposal The provisions of the Union Customs Code 1 (the Code) are being applied since 1 May 2016. A major goal of the Code is the shift to a complete use of electronic systems for interactions between economic operators and customs authorities, and between customs authorities, and the end of paper-based customs processes. The Code provides that different customs processes should be covered by electronic systems while also providing that the details of and planning for such systems should be set out in a separate Work Programme. The UCC Work Programme 2 draws up planning for seventeen UCC electronic systems in total, on the basis of the Multi-Annual Strategic Plan (MASP) for all electronic customs projects that is prepared and updated regularly in accordance with a 2008 Decision 3 of the European Parliament and the Council . The systems can be divided into two categories: (a) fourteen trans-European systems including some systems that have national components for development by the Member States and (b) three national systems that have to be developed or upgraded by the Member States alone. Article 278 of the Code provides that, until all the new electronic systems envisaged under the Code are operational, existing electronic and paper-based systems can continue to be used for customs processes. The Article establishes the end of 2020, at the latest, as the date by which the use of these transitional arrangements must cease. In line with this deadline, the Work Programme sets out step-by-step plans for completion of the work on the electronic systems by 2020. The Commission and the Member States are on track to finish the major part of the work on the electronic systems on time. In 2017 three of the seventeen systems were implemented and a first phase of another system was completed, all by their scheduled dates. In effect, close to eighty per cent of the Commission's work on the trans-European systems provided for under the Work Programme will be completed by that date. However, the last phases of development of IT systems are often the longest and therefore, while most systems will be completed by 2020, some will only be partially completed. There are many challenges for both the Commission and Member States in this work of implementing seventeen electronic systems. These challenges, that were impossible to predict at the time the deadline was set, include the following: · The unavoidable delay in completing the design of the electronic systems. When setting the 2020 deadline, it was anticipated that the rules supplementing and implementing the UCC (the UCC Delegated Regulation, 4 the UCC Implementing Regulation 5 and the UCC Transitional Delegated Regulation 6 ) would be adopted very soon after the adoption of the UCC in 2013, so that their provisions could be taken into account in developing the IT systems. However, as it happened, discussions took much longer than expected and the acts were only adopted in their final form in late 2015/early 2016. This delay meant a delay in producing the functional and technical specifications for many of the electronic systems. · The enormity of the work of interlinking seventeen electronic systems across the whole of the EU and the particular complexity of some of the electronic systems. These elements only became apparent as work started on the functional and technical specifications for the systems. Having the full picture following the work on the specifications has led the Commission and Member States to the conclusion that a revision of the target date for completion of the systems is necessary in some cases. This is particularly true for those electronic systems for which the specifications will only be completed in 2018. · Data harmonisation difficulties. Since the adoption of the Delegated Regulation and the Implementing Regulation, work is also proceeding at an intensive pace on harmonisation of the data provided by economic operators. This element is crucial for the interoperability of the different UCC electronic systems, for a harmonised application of the legal rules and for cooperation with other public services active at the border. Harmonising the data in line with international data models such as that of the World Customs Organisation also ensures better linkages with the IT systems of third countries and thus greatly facilitates trade. However, this work involves a much heavier than expected investment in terms of time and in financial terms in fully reprogramming some of the existing electronic systems. · Sequencing. When planning realistic timelines and costs, close attention must be paid to the impact of the proposed electronic changes on the customs and trade eco-system. As the electronic systems are closely interlinked, it is important to introduce them in the right order (sequencing) so as to ensure that interdependencies are respected and that the changes for administrations and trade are introduced in a structured and coherent manner. For all of these reasons, it has become necessary to provide for a later date (2025 at the latest) for full completion of work on some of the systems. This target date will ensure the smooth implementation by 2020 of the majority of the systems and the later implementation of the remaining systems, in proper sequence, on dates between 2021 and 2025. Half of the systems for which implementation is to be delayed already exist and are merely being upgraded under the UCC while the other half are new systems. The systems to be postponed are as follows: · Upgrades for which the main technical challenge is the harmonisation of data i.e. the upgrades of the Import Control System (ICS), the New Computerised Transit System (NCTS), the Automated Export System (AES) and the National Export System (including the export component of the national Special Procedures System); and · Three new systems which are designed to apply innovative features of the Code i.e. Centralised Clearance for Import (CCI), Proof of Union Status (PoUS) and Guarantee Management (GUM). The postponement to 2025 of the latest delivery date for these electronic systems conflicts with Article 278 of the Code which only allows the use of means for the exchange and storage of information other than the planned electronic systems until 2020. Therefore, the deadline in Article 278 must be extended in respect of the delayed systems. Furthermore, action must be taken quickly in order to ensure legal certainty; business and customs administrations would have serious problems if, by 2020, some of the electronic systems were not implemented and at the same time the law prohibited the continued transitional use of alternative arrangements. As Member States and businesses need on average two years to make arrangements for each electronic system, the Commission has to provide certainty by 2018 about the re-planning for some of the systems and the related extension of the applicability of transitional arrangements after 2020 up to 2025.
Revised version (Article 37 Conferral of implementing powers):
1. The Commission shall adopt, by means of implementing acts, the procedural rules for: (a) using a BTI or BOI decision after it ceases to be valid or is revoked, in accordance with Article 34(9); (c) using decisions referred to in Article 35 and determined in accordance with point (b) of Article 36 after they cease to be valid; (d) suspending decisions referred to in Article 35 and determined in accordance with point (b) of Article 36 and notifying the suspension or the withdrawal of the suspension to the customs authorities. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 285(4). 2. The Commission shall adopt, by means of implementing acts, the decisions requesting Member States to revoke: (a) decisions referred to in Article 34(11); (b) decisions referred to in Article 35 and determined in accordance with point (b) of Article 36. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the advisory procedure referred to in Article 285(2). Where the opinion of the committee referred to in Article 285(1) is to be obtained by written procedure, Article 285(6) shall apply.
Article 38 Application and authorisation
1. An economic operator who is established in the customs territory of the Union and who meets the criteria set out in Article 39 may apply for the status of authorised economic operator. The customs authorities shall, following consultation with other competent authorities if necessary, grant that status, which shall be subject to monitoring. 2. The status of authorised economic operator shall consist in the following types of authorisations: (a) that of an authorised economic operator for customs simplifications, which shall enable the holder to benefit from certain simplifications in accordance with the customs legislation; or (b) that of an authorised economic operator for security and safety that shall entitle the holder to facilitations relating to security and safety. 3. Both types of authorisations referred to in paragraph 2 may be held at the same time. 4. The status of authorised economic operator shall, subject to Articles 39, 40 and 41, be recognised by the customs authorities in all Member States. 5. Customs authorities shall, on the basis of the recognition of the status of authorised economic operator for customs simplifications and provided that the requirements related to a specific type of simplification provided for in the customs legislation are fulfilled, authorise the operator to benefit from that simplification. Customs authorities shall not re-examine those criteria which have already been examined when granting the status of authorised economic operator. 6. The authorised economic operator referred to in paragraph 2 shall enjoy more favourable treatment than other economic operators in respect of customs controls according to the type of authorisation granted, including fewer physical and document-based controls. 7. The customs authorities shall grant benefits resulting from the status of authorised economic operator to persons established in countries or territories outside the customs territory of the Union, who fulfil conditions and comply with obligations defined by the relevant legislation of those countries or territories, insofar as those conditions and obligations are recognised by the Union as equivalent to those imposed to authorised economic operators established in the customs territory of the Union. Such a granting of benefits shall be based on the principle of reciprocity unless otherwise decided by the Union, and shall be supported by an international agreement or Union legislation in the area of the common commercial policy.
Article 39 Granting of status
The criteria for the granting of the status of authorised economic operator shall be the following: (a) the absence of any serious infringement or repeated infringements of customs legislation and taxation rules, including no record of serious criminal offences relating to the economic activity of the applicant; (b) the demonstration by the applicant of a high level of control of his or her operations and of the flow of goods, by means of a system of managing commercial and, where appropriate, transport records, which allows appropriate customs controls; (c) financial solvency, which shall be deemed to be proven where the applicant has good financial standing, which enables him or her to fulfil his or her commitments, with due regard to the characteristics of the type of business activity concerned; (d) with regard to the authorisation referred to in point (a) of Article 38(2), practical standards of competence or professional qualifications directly related to the activity carried out; and (e) with regard to the authorisation referred to in point (b) of Article 38(2), appropriate security and safety standards, which shall be considered as fulfilled where the applicant demonstrates that he or she maintains appropriate measures to ensure the security and safety of the international supply chain including in the areas of physical integrity and access controls, logistical processes and handling of specific types of goods, personnel and identification of his or her business partners.
Article 40 Delegation of power
The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts, in accordance with Article 284, in order to determine the following: (a) the simplifications referred to in point (a) of Article 38(2); (b) the facilitations referred to in point (b) of Article 38(2); (c) the more favourable treatment referred to in Article 38(6).
Amendment rationale: CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL Reasons for and objectives of the proposal The provisions of the Union Customs Code 1 (the Code) are being applied since 1 May 2016. A major goal of the Code is the shift to a complete use of electronic systems for interactions between economic operators and customs authorities, and between customs authorities, and the end of paper-based customs processes. The Code provides that different customs processes should be covered by electronic systems while also providing that the details of and planning for such systems should be set out in a separate Work Programme. The UCC Work Programme 2 draws up planning for seventeen UCC electronic systems in total, on the basis of the Multi-Annual Strategic Plan (MASP) for all electronic customs projects that is prepared and updated regularly in accordance with a 2008 Decision 3 of the European Parliament and the Council . The systems can be divided into two categories: (a) fourteen trans-European systems including some systems that have national components for development by the Member States and (b) three national systems that have to be developed or upgraded by the Member States alone. Article 278 of the Code provides that, until all the new electronic systems envisaged under the Code are operational, existing electronic and paper-based systems can continue to be used for customs processes. The Article establishes the end of 2020, at the latest, as the date by which the use of these transitional arrangements must cease. In line with this deadline, the Work Programme sets out step-by-step plans for completion of the work on the electronic systems by 2020. The Commission and the Member States are on track to finish the major part of the work on the electronic systems on time. In 2017 three of the seventeen systems were implemented and a first phase of another system was completed, all by their scheduled dates. In effect, close to eighty per cent of the Commission's work on the trans-European systems provided for under the Work Programme will be completed by that date. However, the last phases of development of IT systems are often the longest and therefore, while most systems will be completed by 2020, some will only be partially completed. There are many challenges for both the Commission and Member States in this work of implementing seventeen electronic systems. These challenges, that were impossible to predict at the time the deadline was set, include the following: · The unavoidable delay in completing the design of the electronic systems. When setting the 2020 deadline, it was anticipated that the rules supplementing and implementing the UCC (the UCC Delegated Regulation, 4 the UCC Implementing Regulation 5 and the UCC Transitional Delegated Regulation 6 ) would be adopted very soon after the adoption of the UCC in 2013, so that their provisions could be taken into account in developing the IT systems. However, as it happened, discussions took much longer than expected and the acts were only adopted in their final form in late 2015/early 2016. This delay meant a delay in producing the functional and technical specifications for many of the electronic systems. · The enormity of the work of interlinking seventeen electronic systems across the whole of the EU and the particular complexity of some of the electronic systems. These elements only became apparent as work started on the functional and technical specifications for the systems. Having the full picture following the work on the specifications has led the Commission and Member States to the conclusion that a revision of the target date for completion of the systems is necessary in some cases. This is particularly true for those electronic systems for which the specifications will only be completed in 2018. · Data harmonisation difficulties. Since the adoption of the Delegated Regulation and the Implementing Regulation, work is also proceeding at an intensive pace on harmonisation of the data provided by economic operators. This element is crucial for the interoperability of the different UCC electronic systems, for a harmonised application of the legal rules and for cooperation with other public services active at the border. Harmonising the data in line with international data models such as that of the World Customs Organisation also ensures better linkages with the IT systems of third countries and thus greatly facilitates trade. However, this work involves a much heavier than expected investment in terms of time and in financial terms in fully reprogramming some of the existing electronic systems. · Sequencing. When planning realistic timelines and costs, close attention must be paid to the impact of the proposed electronic changes on the customs and trade eco-system. As the electronic systems are closely interlinked, it is important to introduce them in the right order (sequencing) so as to ensure that interdependencies are respected and that the changes for administrations and trade are introduced in a structured and coherent manner. For all of these reasons, it has become necessary to provide for a later date (2025 at the latest) for full completion of work on some of the systems. This target date will ensure the smooth implementation by 2020 of the majority of the systems and the later implementation of the remaining systems, in proper sequence, on dates between 2021 and 2025. Half of the systems for which implementation is to be delayed already exist and are merely being upgraded under the UCC while the other half are new systems. The systems to be postponed are as follows: · Upgrades for which the main technical challenge is the harmonisation of data i.e. the upgrades of the Import Control System (ICS), the New Computerised Transit System (NCTS), the Automated Export System (AES) and the National Export System (including the export component of the national Special Procedures System); and · Three new systems which are designed to apply innovative features of the Code i.e. Centralised Clearance for Import (CCI), Proof of Union Status (PoUS) and Guarantee Management (GUM). The postponement to 2025 of the latest delivery date for these electronic systems conflicts with Article 278 of the Code which only allows the use of means for the exchange and storage of information other than the planned electronic systems until 2020. Therefore, the deadline in Article 278 must be extended in respect of the delayed systems. Furthermore, action must be taken quickly in order to ensure legal certainty; business and customs administrations would have serious problems if, by 2020, some of the electronic systems were not implemented and at the same time the law prohibited the continued transitional use of alternative arrangements. As Member States and businesses need on average two years to make arrangements for each electronic system, the Commission has to provide certainty by 2018 about the re-planning for some of the systems and the related extension of the applicability of transitional arrangements after 2020 up to 2025.
Revised version (Article 40 Delegation of power):
The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts, in accordance with Article 284, in order to determine the following: the simplifications referred to in point (a) of Article 38(2); the facilitations referred to in point (b) of Article 38(2); (c) the more favourable treatment referred to in Article 38(6).
Article 41 Conferral of implementing powers
The Commission shall adopt, by means of implementing acts, the modalities for the application of the criteria referred to in Article 39. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 285(4).
Article 42 Application of penalties
1. Each Member State shall provide for penalties for failure to comply with the customs legislation. Such penalties shall be effective, proportionate and dissuasive. 2. Where administrative penalties are applied, they may take, inter alia, one or both of the following forms: (a) a pecuniary charge by the customs authorities, including, where appropriate, a settlement applied in place of and in lieu of a criminal penalty; (b) the revocation, suspension or amendment of any authorisation held by the person concerned. 3. Member States shall notify the Commission, within 180 days from the date of application of this Article, as determined in accordance with Article 288(2), of the national provisions in force, as envisaged in paragraph 1 of this Article, and shall notify it without delay of any subsequent amendment affecting those provisions.
Article 43 Decisions taken by a judicial authority
Articles 44 and 45 shall not apply to appeals lodged with a view to the annulment, revocation or amendment of a decision relating to the application of the customs legislation taken by a judicial authority, or by customs authorities acting as judicial authorities.
Article 44 Right of appeal
1. Any person shall have the right to appeal against any decision taken by the customs authorities relating to the application of the customs legislation which concerns him or her directly and individually. Any person who has applied to the customs authorities for a decision and has not obtained a decision on that application within the time-limits referred to in Article 22(3) shall also be entitled to exercise the right of appeal. 2. The right of appeal may be exercised in at least two steps: (a) initially, before the customs authorities or a judicial authority or other body designated for that purpose by the Member States; (b) subsequently, before a higher independent body, which may be a judicial authority or an equivalent specialised body, according to the provisions in force in the Member States. 3. The appeal shall be lodged in the Member State where the decision was taken or was applied for. 4. Member States shall ensure that the appeals procedure enables the prompt confirmation or correction of decisions taken by the customs authorities.
Article 45 Suspension of implementation
1. The submission of an appeal shall not cause implementation of the disputed decision to be suspended. 2. The customs authorities shall, however, suspend implementation of such a decision in whole or in part where they have good reason to believe that the disputed decision is inconsistent with the customs legislation or that irreparable damage is to be feared for the person concerned. 3. In the cases referred to in paragraph 2, where the disputed decision has the effect of causing import or export duty to be payable, suspension of implementation of that decision shall be conditional upon the provision of a guarantee, unless it is established, on the basis of a documented assessment, that such a guarantee would be likely to cause the debtor serious economic or social difficulties.
Article 46 Risk management and customs controls
1. The customs authorities may carry out any customs controls they deem necessary. Customs controls may in particular consist of examining goods, taking samples, verifying the accuracy and completeness of the information given in a declaration or notification and the existence, authenticity, accuracy and validity of documents, examining the accounts of economic operators and other records, inspecting means of transport, inspecting luggage and other goods carried by or on persons and carrying out official enquiries and other similar acts. 2. Customs controls, other than random checks, shall primarily be based on risk analysis using electronic data-processing techniques, with the purpose of identifying and evaluating the risks and developing the necessary counter-measures, on the basis of criteria developed at national, Union and, where available, international level. 3. Customs controls shall be performed within a common risk management framework, based upon the exchange of risk information and risk analysis results between customs administrations and establishing common risk criteria and standards, control measures and priority control areas. Controls based upon such information and criteria shall be carried out without prejudice to other controls carried out in accordance with paragraph 1 or with other provisions in force. 4. Customs authorities shall undertake risk management to differentiate between the levels of risk associated with goods subject to customs control or supervision and to determine whether the goods will be subject to specific customs controls, and if so, where. The risk management shall include activities such as collecting data and information, analysing and assessing risk, prescribing and taking action and regularly monitoring and reviewing that process and its outcomes, based on international, Union and national sources and strategies. 5. Customs authorities shall exchange risk information and risk analysis results where: (a) the risks are assessed by a customs authority as being significant and requiring customs control and the results of the control establish that the event triggering the risks has occurred; or (b) the control results do not establish that the event triggering the risks has occurred, but the customs authority concerned considers the threat to present a high risk elsewhere in the Union. 6. For the establishment of the common risk criteria and standards, the control measures and the priority control areas referred to in paragraph 3, account shall be taken of all of the following: (a) the proportionality to the risk; (b) the urgency of the necessary application of the controls; (c) the probable impact on trade flow, on individual Member States and on control resources. 7. The common risk criteria and standards referred to in paragraph 3 shall include all of the following: (a) a description of the risks; (b) the factors or indicators of risk to be used to select goods or economic operators for customs control; (c) the nature of customs controls to be undertaken by the customs authorities; (d) the duration of the application of the customs controls referred to in point (c). 8. Priority control areas shall cover particular customs procedures, types of goods, traffic routes, modes of transport or economic operators which are subject to increased levels of risk analysis and customs controls during a certain period, without prejudice to other controls usually carried out by the customs authorities.
Article 47 Cooperation between authorities
1. Where, in respect of the same goods, controls other than customs controls are to be performed by competent authorities other than the customs authorities, customs authorities shall, in close cooperation with those other authorities, endeavour to have those controls performed, wherever possible, at the same time and place as customs controls (one-stop-shop), with customs authorities having the coordinating role in achieving this. 2. In the framework of the controls referred to in this Section, customs and other competent authorities may, where necessary for the purposes of minimising risk and combating fraud, exchange with each other and with the Commission data received in the context of the entry, exit, transit, movement, storage and end-use of goods, including postal traffic, moved between the customs territory of the Union and countries or territories outside the customs territory of the Union, the presence and movement within the customs territory of the Union of non-Union goods and goods placed under the end-use procedure, and the results of any control. Customs authorities and the Commission may also exchange such data with each other for the purpose of ensuring a uniform application of the customs legislation.
Article 48 Post-release control
For the purpose of customs controls, the customs authorities may verify the accuracy and completeness of the information given in a customs declaration, temporary storage declaration, entry summary declaration, exit summary declaration, re-export declaration or re-export notification, and the existence, authenticity, accuracy and validity of any supporting document and may examine the accounts of the declarant and other records relating to the operations in respect of the goods in question or to prior or subsequent commercial operations involving those goods after having released them. Those authorities may also examine such goods and/or take samples where it is still possible for them to do so. Such controls may be carried out at the premises of the holder of the goods or of the holder's representative, of any other person directly or indirectly involved in those operations in a business capacity or of any other person in possession of those documents and data for business purposes.
Article 49 Intra-Union flights and sea crossings
1. Customs controls or formalities shall be carried out in respect of the cabin and hold baggage of persons either taking an intra-Union flight, or making an intra-Union sea crossing, only where the customs legislation provides for such controls or formalities. 2. Paragraph 1 shall apply without prejudice to either of the following: (a) security and safety checks; (b) checks linked to prohibitions or restrictions.
Article 50 Conferral of implementing powers
1. The Commission shall adopt, by means of implementing acts, measures to ensure uniform application of the customs controls, including the exchange of risk information and risk analysis results, the common risk criteria and standards, the control measures and the priority control areas referred to in Article 46(3). Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 285(4). On imperative grounds of urgency relating to such measures, duly justified by the need to rapidly update the common risk management framework and adapt the exchange of risk information and analysis, common risk criteria and standards, control measures and priority control areas to the evolution of risks, the Commission shall adopt immediately applicable implementing acts in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 285(5). Where the opinion of the committee referred to in Article 285(1) is to be obtained by written procedure, Article 285(6) shall apply. 2. The Commission shall determine, by means of implementing acts, the ports or airports where, in accordance with Article 49, customs controls and formalities are applied to the following: (a) the cabin and hold baggage of persons: (i) taking a flight in an aircraft which comes from a non-Union airport and which, after a stopover at a Union airport, continues to another Union airport; (ii) taking a flight in an aircraft which stops over at a Union airport before continuing to a non-Union airport; (iii) using a maritime service provided by the same vessel and comprising successive legs departing from, calling at or terminating in a non-Union port; (iv) on board pleasure craft and tourist or business aircraft; (a) the cabin and hold baggage of persons: (i) taking a flight in an aircraft which comes from a non-Union airport and which, after a stopover at a Union airport, continues to another Union airport; (ii) taking a flight in an aircraft which stops over at a Union airport before continuing to a non-Union airport; (iii) using a maritime service provided by the same vessel and comprising successive legs departing from, calling at or terminating in a non-Union port; (iv) on board pleasure craft and tourist or business aircraft; (b) cabin and hold baggage: (i) arriving at a Union airport on board an aircraft coming from a non-Union airport and transferred at that Union airport to another aircraft proceeding on an intra-Union flight; (ii) loaded at a Union airport onto an aircraft proceeding on an intra-Union flight for transfer at another Union airport to an aircraft whose destination is a non-Union airport. (b) cabin and hold baggage: (i) arriving at a Union airport on board an aircraft coming from a non-Union airport and transferred at that Union airport to another aircraft proceeding on an intra-Union flight; (ii) loaded at a Union airport onto an aircraft proceeding on an intra-Union flight for transfer at another Union airport to an aircraft whose destination is a non-Union airport.
Amendment rationale: CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL Reasons for and objectives of the proposal Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 October 2013 laying down the Union Customs Code (UCC) 1 aims at facilitating legitimate trade while ensuring appropriate customs supervision and the fight against fraud. The UCC entered into force on 30 October 2013, but it applies in its entirety from 1 May 2016. This proposal aims at modifying Article 136 UCC in order to ensure the effective application of other UCC provisions, notably those on customs supervision. This amendment should enter into force as soon as possible so as to contribute to effective customs supervision. With a view to facilitating trade flows, Article 136 UCC states that certain provisions (in particular those governing the obligations to lodge the entry summary declaration, to notify the arrival of a sea-going vessel or an aircraft, to convey and present the goods to customs upon unloading or transhipment and to wait authorisation before unloading or transhipping the goods, and those governing temporary storage) do not apply to goods that have temporarily left the Union customs territory while moving by direct route between two points of that territory by sea or air without a stop outside the Union. However, the disapplication of those provisions may put at risk the effective customs supervision of these goods. Article 136 UCC does not eliminate the requirement laid down in Article 134 UCC for goods brought into the customs territory of the Union to be subject to customs supervision and, where appropriate, to customs controls. However, the current text of Article 136 has the consequence that there is no clear legal basis to require presentation of these goods to the customs authorities. In the absence of such presentation, the supervision by the customs authorities of non-Union goods and of Union goods whose status must be proven may become more difficult. The customs authorities in these subsequent ports or airports must have the opportunity to ensure the complete and correct levying of import duty and other charges, or the correct application of non-fiscal measures (e.g. veterinary or phytosanitary controls) as well as identifying risks on goods arriving in their ports or airports. In order to ensure the proper application of other UCC provisions, notably those on customs supervision, it is therefore indispensable to propose a modification to the scope of Article 136 UCC, distinguishing between non-Union and Union goods, as follows: (1) First, the only provisions not applying when non-Union goods re-enter the Union customs territory after having temporarily left it by direct sea or air route, should be: (1) The rules governing the obligation to lodge the entry summary declaration (Articles 127 to 130 UCC) and (2) The rules governing the obligation to notify the arrival of a sea-going vessel or aircraft to the customs office of first entry to the Union customs territory (Article 133 UCC). (3) By contrast, the provisions governing the obligation to convey the goods to a certain place, to present them to customs upon unloading or transhipment, to wait for authorisation before unloading or transhipping, and the provisions on temporary storage should apply in these situations, thereby allowing appropriate customs supervision. (2) Second, the situation should be similar for Union goods whose status needs to be proven pursuant to Article 153(2) UCC, to the extent that the customs authorities must be able to check the proof of their Union status. (3) Third, the rules not applying to Union goods that have retained their status by virtue of Article 155(2) UCC can in addition include the rules governing the obligation to present the goods to customs upon unloading or transhipment, and the obligation to wait for authorisation before unloading or transhipping the goods (139 to 140 UCC). This is due to the fact that, even if the goods have temporarily left the Union customs territory, their status has not been altered and does not need to be proven. (4) Finally, certain references should be deleted from Article 136 UCC, as follows: (1) The reference to Articles 135(1) and 137 UCC should be deleted from because the goods should be conveyed to certain places designated by the customs authorities in any event; (2) The reference to Article 141 UCC should be deleted because Article 141(1) should continue to be applicable to goods moved under the transit procedure when they re-enter the customs Union. (3) The reference to Articles 144 to 149 UCC should be deleted because the provisions on temporary storage do not apply to Union goods in any event and their application for non-Union goods was excluded by mistake. 
Revised version (Article 50 Conferral of implementing powers):
1. The Commission shall adopt, by means of implementing acts, measures to ensure uniform application of the customs controls, including the exchange of risk information and risk analysis results, the common risk criteria and standards, the control measures and the priority control areas referred to in Article 46(3). Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 285(4). On imperative grounds of urgency relating to such measures, duly justified by the need to rapidly update the common risk management framework and adapt the exchange of risk information and analysis, common risk criteria and standards, control measures and priority control areas to the evolution of risks, the Commission shall adopt immediately applicable implementing acts in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 285(5). Where the opinion of the committee referred to in Article 285(1) is to be obtained by written procedure, Article 285(6) shall apply. 2. The Commission shall determine, by means of implementing acts, the ports or airports where, in accordance with Article 49, customs controls and formalities are applied to the following: (a) the cabin and hold baggage of persons: (i) taking a flight in an aircraft which comes from a non-Union airport and which, after a stopover at a Union airport, continues to another Union airport; (ii) taking a flight in an aircraft which stops over at a Union airport before continuing to a non-Union airport; (iii) using a maritime service provided by the same vessel and comprising successive legs departing from, calling at or terminating in a non-Union port; (iv) on board pleasure craft and tourist or business aircraft; (b) cabin and hold baggage: (i) arriving at a Union airport on board an aircraft coming from a non-Union airport and transferred at that Union airport to another aircraft proceeding on an intra-Union flight; (ii) loaded at a Union airport onto an aircraft proceeding on an intra-Union flight for transfer at another Union airport to an aircraft whose destination is a non-Union airport.
Article 51 Keeping of documents and other information
1. The person concerned shall, for the purposes of customs controls, keep the documents and information referred to in Article 15(1) for at least three years, by any means accessible by and acceptable to the customs authorities. In the case of goods released for free circulation in circumstances other than those referred to in the third subparagraph, or goods declared for export, that period shall run from the end of the year in which the customs declarations for release for free circulation or export are accepted. In the case of goods released for free circulation duty-free or at a reduced rate of import duty on account of their end-use, that period shall run from the end of the year in which they cease to be subject to customs supervision. In the case of goods placed under another customs procedure or of goods in temporary storage, that period shall run from the end of the year in which the customs procedure concerned has been discharged or temporary storage has ended. 2. Without prejudice to Article 103(4), where a customs control in respect of a customs debt shows that the relevant entry in the accounts has to be corrected and the person concerned has been notified of this, the documents and information shall be kept for three years beyond the time-limit provided for in paragraph 1 of this Article. Where an appeal has been lodged or where court proceedings have begun, the documents and information shall be kept for the period provided for in paragraph 1 or until the appeals procedure or court proceedings are terminated, whichever is the later.
Article 52 Charges and costs
1. Customs authorities shall not impose charges for the performance of customs controls or any other application of the customs legislation during the official opening hours of their competent customs offices. 2. Customs authorities may impose charges or recover costs where specific services are rendered, in particular the following: (a) attendance, where requested, by customs staff outside official office hours or at premises other than customs premises; (b) analyses or expert reports on goods and postal fees for the return of goods to an applicant, particularly in respect of decisions taken pursuant to Article 33 or the provision of information in accordance with Article 14(1); (c) the examination or sampling of goods for verification purposes, or the destruction of goods, where costs other than the cost of using customs staff are involved; (d) exceptional control measures, where these are necessary due to the nature of the goods or to a potential risk.
Article 53 Currency conversion
1. The competent authorities shall publish and/or make available on the Internet the rate of exchange applicable where the conversion of currency is necessary for one of the following reasons: (a) because factors used to determine the customs value of goods are expressed in a currency other than that of the Member State where the customs value is determined; (b) because the value of the euro is required in national currencies for the purposes of determining the tariff classification of goods and the amount of import and export duty, including value thresholds in the Common Customs Tariff. 2. Where the conversion of currency is necessary for reasons other than those referred to in paragraph 1, the value of the euro in national currencies to be applied within the framework of the customs legislation shall be fixed at least once a year.
Article 54 Conferral of implementing powers
The Commission shall lay down, by means of implementing acts, rules on currency conversions for the purposes referred to in Article 53(1) and (2). Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 285(4).
Article 55 Periods, dates and time-limits
1. Unless otherwise provided, where a period, date or time-limit is laid down in the customs legislation, such period shall not be extended or reduced and such date or time-limit shall not be deferred or brought forward. 2. The rules applicable to periods, dates and time-limits set out in Regulation (EEC, Euratom) No 1182/71 of the Council of 3 June 1971 determining the rules applicable to periods, dates and time-limits ( 2 ) shall apply, except where otherwise provided for in the customs legislation.
Article 56 Common Customs Tariff and surveillance
1. Import and export duty due shall be based on the Common Customs Tariff. Other measures prescribed by Union provisions governing specific fields relating to trade in goods shall, where appropriate, be applied in accordance with the tariff classification of those goods. 2. The Common Customs Tariff shall comprise all of the following: (a) the Combined Nomenclature of goods as laid down in Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87; (b) any other nomenclature which is wholly or partly based on the Combined Nomenclature or which provides for further subdivisions to it, and which is established by Union provisions governing specific fields with a view to the application of tariff measures relating to trade in goods; (c) the conventional or normal autonomous customs duty applicable to goods covered by the Combined Nomenclature; (d) the preferential tariff measures contained in agreements which the Union has concluded with certain countries or territories outside the customs territory of the Union or groups of such countries or territories; (e) preferential tariff measures adopted unilaterally by the Union in respect of certain countries or territories outside the customs territory of the Union or groups of such countries or territories; (f) autonomous measures providing for a reduction in, or exemption from, customs duty on certain goods; (g) favourable tariff treatment specified for certain goods, by reason of their nature or end-use, in the framework of measures referred to under points (c) to (f) or (h); (h) other tariff measures provided for by agricultural or commercial or other Union legislation. 3. Where the goods concerned fulfil the conditions included in the measures laid down in points (d) to (g) of paragraph 2, the measures referred to in those provisions shall apply, upon application by the declarant, instead of those provided for in point (c) of that paragraph. Such application may be made retrospectively, provided that the time-limits and conditions laid down in the relevant measure or in the Code are complied with. 4. Where application of the measures referred to in points (d) to (g) of paragraph 2, or the exemption from measures referred to in point (h) thereof, is restricted to a certain volume of imports or exports, such application or exemption shall, in the case of tariff quotas, cease as soon as the specified volume of imports or exports is reached. In the case of tariff ceilings such application shall cease by virtue of a legal act of the Union. 5. The release for free circulation or the export of goods, to which the measures referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2 apply, may be made subject to surveillance.
Amendment rationale: CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL Reasons for and objectives of the proposal The provisions of the Union Customs Code 1 (the Code) are being applied since 1 May 2016. A major goal of the Code is the shift to a complete use of electronic systems for interactions between economic operators and customs authorities, and between customs authorities, and the end of paper-based customs processes. The Code provides that different customs processes should be covered by electronic systems while also providing that the details of and planning for such systems should be set out in a separate Work Programme. The UCC Work Programme 2 draws up planning for seventeen UCC electronic systems in total, on the basis of the Multi-Annual Strategic Plan (MASP) for all electronic customs projects that is prepared and updated regularly in accordance with a 2008 Decision 3 of the European Parliament and the Council . The systems can be divided into two categories: (a) fourteen trans-European systems including some systems that have national components for development by the Member States and (b) three national systems that have to be developed or upgraded by the Member States alone. Article 278 of the Code provides that, until all the new electronic systems envisaged under the Code are operational, existing electronic and paper-based systems can continue to be used for customs processes. The Article establishes the end of 2020, at the latest, as the date by which the use of these transitional arrangements must cease. In line with this deadline, the Work Programme sets out step-by-step plans for completion of the work on the electronic systems by 2020. The Commission and the Member States are on track to finish the major part of the work on the electronic systems on time. In 2017 three of the seventeen systems were implemented and a first phase of another system was completed, all by their scheduled dates. In effect, close to eighty per cent of the Commission's work on the trans-European systems provided for under the Work Programme will be completed by that date. However, the last phases of development of IT systems are often the longest and therefore, while most systems will be completed by 2020, some will only be partially completed. There are many challenges for both the Commission and Member States in this work of implementing seventeen electronic systems. These challenges, that were impossible to predict at the time the deadline was set, include the following: · The unavoidable delay in completing the design of the electronic systems. When setting the 2020 deadline, it was anticipated that the rules supplementing and implementing the UCC (the UCC Delegated Regulation, 4 the UCC Implementing Regulation 5 and the UCC Transitional Delegated Regulation 6 ) would be adopted very soon after the adoption of the UCC in 2013, so that their provisions could be taken into account in developing the IT systems. However, as it happened, discussions took much longer than expected and the acts were only adopted in their final form in late 2015/early 2016. This delay meant a delay in producing the functional and technical specifications for many of the electronic systems. · The enormity of the work of interlinking seventeen electronic systems across the whole of the EU and the particular complexity of some of the electronic systems. These elements only became apparent as work started on the functional and technical specifications for the systems. Having the full picture following the work on the specifications has led the Commission and Member States to the conclusion that a revision of the target date for completion of the systems is necessary in some cases. This is particularly true for those electronic systems for which the specifications will only be completed in 2018. · Data harmonisation difficulties. Since the adoption of the Delegated Regulation and the Implementing Regulation, work is also proceeding at an intensive pace on harmonisation of the data provided by economic operators. This element is crucial for the interoperability of the different UCC electronic systems, for a harmonised application of the legal rules and for cooperation with other public services active at the border. Harmonising the data in line with international data models such as that of the World Customs Organisation also ensures better linkages with the IT systems of third countries and thus greatly facilitates trade. However, this work involves a much heavier than expected investment in terms of time and in financial terms in fully reprogramming some of the existing electronic systems. · Sequencing. When planning realistic timelines and costs, close attention must be paid to the impact of the proposed electronic changes on the customs and trade eco-system. As the electronic systems are closely interlinked, it is important to introduce them in the right order (sequencing) so as to ensure that interdependencies are respected and that the changes for administrations and trade are introduced in a structured and coherent manner. For all of these reasons, it has become necessary to provide for a later date (2025 at the latest) for full completion of work on some of the systems. This target date will ensure the smooth implementation by 2020 of the majority of the systems and the later implementation of the remaining systems, in proper sequence, on dates between 2021 and 2025. Half of the systems for which implementation is to be delayed already exist and are merely being upgraded under the UCC while the other half are new systems. The systems to be postponed are as follows: · Upgrades for which the main technical challenge is the harmonisation of data i.e. the upgrades of the Import Control System (ICS), the New Computerised Transit System (NCTS), the Automated Export System (AES) and the National Export System (including the export component of the national Special Procedures System); and · Three new systems which are designed to apply innovative features of the Code i.e. Centralised Clearance for Import (CCI), Proof of Union Status (PoUS) and Guarantee Management (GUM). The postponement to 2025 of the latest delivery date for these electronic systems conflicts with Article 278 of the Code which only allows the use of means for the exchange and storage of information other than the planned electronic systems until 2020. Therefore, the deadline in Article 278 must be extended in respect of the delayed systems. Furthermore, action must be taken quickly in order to ensure legal certainty; business and customs administrations would have serious problems if, by 2020, some of the electronic systems were not implemented and at the same time the law prohibited the continued transitional use of alternative arrangements. As Member States and businesses need on average two years to make arrangements for each electronic system, the Commission has to provide certainty by 2018 about the re-planning for some of the systems and the related extension of the applicability of transitional arrangements after 2020 up to 2025.
Revised version (Article 56 Common Customs Tariff and surveillance):
1. Import and export duty due shall be based on the Common Customs Tariff. Other measures prescribed by Union provisions governing specific fields relating to trade in goods shall, where appropriate, be applied in accordance with the tariff classification of those goods. 2. The Common Customs Tariff shall comprise all of the following: (a) the Combined Nomenclature of goods as laid down in Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87; (b) any other nomenclature which is wholly or partly based on the Combined Nomenclature or which provides for further subdivisions to it, and which is established by Union provisions governing specific fields with a view to the application of tariff measures relating to trade in goods; (c) the conventional or normal autonomous customs duty applicable to goods covered by the Combined Nomenclature; (d) the preferential tariff measures contained in agreements which the Union has concluded with certain countries or territories outside the customs territory of the Union or groups of such countries or territories; (e) preferential tariff measures adopted unilaterally by the Union in respect of certain countries or territories outside the customs territory of the Union or groups of such countries or territories; (f) autonomous measures providing for a reduction in, or exemption from, customs duty on certain goods; (h) other tariff measures provided for by agricultural or commercial or other Union legislation. 3. Where the goods concerned fulfil the conditions included in the measures laid down in points (d) to (g) of paragraph 2, the measures referred to in those provisions shall apply, upon application by the declarant, instead of those provided for in point (c) of that paragraph. Such application may be made retrospectively, provided that the time-limits and conditions laid down in the relevant measure or in the Code are complied with. 4. Where application of the measures referred to in points (d) to (g) of paragraph 2, or the exemption from measures referred to in point (h) thereof, is restricted to a certain volume of imports or exports, such application or exemption shall, in the case of tariff quotas, cease as soon as the specified volume of imports or exports is reached. In the case of tariff ceilings such application shall cease by virtue of a legal act of the Union. 5. The release for free circulation or the export of goods, to which the measures referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2 apply, may be made subject to surveillance.
Article 57 Tariff classification of goods
1. For the application of the Common Customs Tariff, tariff classification of goods shall consist in the determination of one of the subheadings or further subdivisions of the Combined Nomenclature under which those goods are to be classified. 2. For the application of non-tariff measures, tariff classification of goods shall consist in the determination of one of the subheadings or further subdivisions of the Combined Nomenclature, or of any other nomenclature which is established by Union provisions and which is wholly or partly based on the Combined Nomenclature or which provides for further subdivisions to it, under which those goods are to be classified. 3. The subheading or further subdivision determined in accordance with paragraphs 1 and 2 shall be used for the purpose of applying the measures linked to that subheading. 4. The Commission may adopt measures to determine the tariff classification of goods in accordance with paragraphs 1 and 2.
Article 58 Conferral of implementing powers
1. The Commission shall adopt, by means of implementing acts, measures on the uniform management of the tariff quotas and the tariff ceilings referred to in Article 56(4) and on the management of the surveillance of the release for free circulation or export of goods, referred to in Article 56(5). Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 285(4). 2. The Commission shall adopt, by means of implementing acts, the measures referred to in Article 57(4). On imperative grounds of urgency relating to such measures, duly justified by the need to rapidly ensure the correct and uniform application of the Combined Nomenclature, the Commission shall adopt immediately applicable implementing acts in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 285(5). Where the opinion of the committee referred to in Article 285(1) is to be obtained by written procedure, Article 285(6) shall apply.
Article 59 Scope
Articles 60 and 61 shall lay down rules for the determination of the non-preferential origin of goods for the purposes of applying the following: (a) the Common Customs Tariff, with the exception of the measures referred to in points (d) and (e) of Article 56(2); (b) measures, other than tariff measures, established by Union provisions governing specific fields relating to trade in goods; and (c) other Union measures relating to the origin of goods.
Amendment rationale: CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL Reasons for and objectives of the proposal The provisions of the Union Customs Code 1 (the Code) are being applied since 1 May 2016. A major goal of the Code is the shift to a complete use of electronic systems for interactions between economic operators and customs authorities, and between customs authorities, and the end of paper-based customs processes. The Code provides that different customs processes should be covered by electronic systems while also providing that the details of and planning for such systems should be set out in a separate Work Programme. The UCC Work Programme 2 draws up planning for seventeen UCC electronic systems in total, on the basis of the Multi-Annual Strategic Plan (MASP) for all electronic customs projects that is prepared and updated regularly in accordance with a 2008 Decision 3 of the European Parliament and the Council . The systems can be divided into two categories: (a) fourteen trans-European systems including some systems that have national components for development by the Member States and (b) three national systems that have to be developed or upgraded by the Member States alone. Article 278 of the Code provides that, until all the new electronic systems envisaged under the Code are operational, existing electronic and paper-based systems can continue to be used for customs processes. The Article establishes the end of 2020, at the latest, as the date by which the use of these transitional arrangements must cease. In line with this deadline, the Work Programme sets out step-by-step plans for completion of the work on the electronic systems by 2020. The Commission and the Member States are on track to finish the major part of the work on the electronic systems on time. In 2017 three of the seventeen systems were implemented and a first phase of another system was completed, all by their scheduled dates. In effect, close to eighty per cent of the Commission's work on the trans-European systems provided for under the Work Programme will be completed by that date. However, the last phases of development of IT systems are often the longest and therefore, while most systems will be completed by 2020, some will only be partially completed. There are many challenges for both the Commission and Member States in this work of implementing seventeen electronic systems. These challenges, that were impossible to predict at the time the deadline was set, include the following: · The unavoidable delay in completing the design of the electronic systems. When setting the 2020 deadline, it was anticipated that the rules supplementing and implementing the UCC (the UCC Delegated Regulation, 4 the UCC Implementing Regulation 5 and the UCC Transitional Delegated Regulation 6 ) would be adopted very soon after the adoption of the UCC in 2013, so that their provisions could be taken into account in developing the IT systems. However, as it happened, discussions took much longer than expected and the acts were only adopted in their final form in late 2015/early 2016. This delay meant a delay in producing the functional and technical specifications for many of the electronic systems. · The enormity of the work of interlinking seventeen electronic systems across the whole of the EU and the particular complexity of some of the electronic systems. These elements only became apparent as work started on the functional and technical specifications for the systems. Having the full picture following the work on the specifications has led the Commission and Member States to the conclusion that a revision of the target date for completion of the systems is necessary in some cases. This is particularly true for those electronic systems for which the specifications will only be completed in 2018. · Data harmonisation difficulties. Since the adoption of the Delegated Regulation and the Implementing Regulation, work is also proceeding at an intensive pace on harmonisation of the data provided by economic operators. This element is crucial for the interoperability of the different UCC electronic systems, for a harmonised application of the legal rules and for cooperation with other public services active at the border. Harmonising the data in line with international data models such as that of the World Customs Organisation also ensures better linkages with the IT systems of third countries and thus greatly facilitates trade. However, this work involves a much heavier than expected investment in terms of time and in financial terms in fully reprogramming some of the existing electronic systems. · Sequencing. When planning realistic timelines and costs, close attention must be paid to the impact of the proposed electronic changes on the customs and trade eco-system. As the electronic systems are closely interlinked, it is important to introduce them in the right order (sequencing) so as to ensure that interdependencies are respected and that the changes for administrations and trade are introduced in a structured and coherent manner. For all of these reasons, it has become necessary to provide for a later date (2025 at the latest) for full completion of work on some of the systems. This target date will ensure the smooth implementation by 2020 of the majority of the systems and the later implementation of the remaining systems, in proper sequence, on dates between 2021 and 2025. Half of the systems for which implementation is to be delayed already exist and are merely being upgraded under the UCC while the other half are new systems. The systems to be postponed are as follows: · Upgrades for which the main technical challenge is the harmonisation of data i.e. the upgrades of the Import Control System (ICS), the New Computerised Transit System (NCTS), the Automated Export System (AES) and the National Export System (including the export component of the national Special Procedures System); and · Three new systems which are designed to apply innovative features of the Code i.e. Centralised Clearance for Import (CCI), Proof of Union Status (PoUS) and Guarantee Management (GUM). The postponement to 2025 of the latest delivery date for these electronic systems conflicts with Article 278 of the Code which only allows the use of means for the exchange and storage of information other than the planned electronic systems until 2020. Therefore, the deadline in Article 278 must be extended in respect of the delayed systems. Furthermore, action must be taken quickly in order to ensure legal certainty; business and customs administrations would have serious problems if, by 2020, some of the electronic systems were not implemented and at the same time the law prohibited the continued transitional use of alternative arrangements. As Member States and businesses need on average two years to make arrangements for each electronic system, the Commission has to provide certainty by 2018 about the re-planning for some of the systems and the related extension of the applicability of transitional arrangements after 2020 up to 2025.
Revised version (Article 59 Scope):
Articles 60 and 61 shall lay down rules for the determination of the non-preferential origin of goods for the purposes of applying the following: (b) measures, other than tariff measures, established by Union provisions governing specific fields relating to trade in goods; and (c) other Union measures relating to the origin of goods.
Article 60 Acquisition of origin
1. Goods wholly obtained in a single country or territory shall be regarded as having their origin in that country or territory. 2. Goods the production of which involves more than one country or territory shall be deemed to originate in the country or territory where they underwent their last, substantial, economically-justified processing or working, in an undertaking equipped for that purpose, resulting in the manufacture of a new product or representing an important stage of manufacture.
Article 61 Proof of origin
1. Where an origin has been indicated in the customs declaration pursuant to the customs legislation, the customs authorities may require the declarant to prove the origin of the goods. 2. Where proof of origin of goods is provided pursuant to the customs legislation or other Union legislation governing specific fields, the customs authorities may, in the event of reasonable doubt, require any additional evidence needed in order to ensure that the indication of origin complies with the rules laid down by the relevant Union legislation. 3. Where the exigencies of trade so require, a document proving origin may be issued in the Union in accordance with the rules of origin in force in the country or territory of destination or any other method identifying the country where the goods were wholly obtained or underwent their last substantial transformation.
Article 62 Delegation of power
The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 284, laying down the rules under which goods, whose determination of non-preferential origin is required for the purposes of applying the Union measures referred to in Article 59, are considered as wholly obtained in a single country or territory or to have undergone their last, substantial, economically-justified processing or working, in an undertaking equipped for that purpose, resulting in the manufacture of a new product or representing an important stage of manufacture in a country or territory, in accordance with Article 60.
Article 63 Conferral of implementing powers
The Commission shall adopt, by means of implementing acts, the procedural rules for the provision and verification of the proof of origin referred to in Article 61. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 285(4).
Article 64 Preferential origin of goods
1. In order to benefit from the measures referred to in points (d) or (e) of Article 56(2) or from non-tariff preferential measures, goods shall comply with the rules on preferential origin referred to in paragraphs 2 to 5 of this Article. 2. In the case of goods benefiting from preferential measures contained in agreements which the Union has concluded with certain countries or territories outside the customs territory of the Union or with groups of such countries or territories, the rules on preferential origin shall be laid down in those agreements. 3. In the case of goods benefiting from preferential measures adopted unilaterally by the Union in respect of certain countries or territories outside the customs territory of the Union or groups of such countries or territories, other than those referred to in paragraph 5, the Commission shall adopt measures laying down the rules on preferential origin. Those rules shall be based either on the criterion that goods are wholly obtained or on the criterion that goods result from sufficient processing or working. 4. In the case of goods benefiting from preferential measures applicable in trade between the customs territory of the Union and Ceuta and Melilla, as contained in Protocol 2 to the 1985 Act of Accession, the rules on preferential origin shall be adopted in accordance with Article 9 of that Protocol. 5. In the case of goods benefiting from preferential measures contained in preferential arrangements in favour of the overseas countries and territories associated with the Union, the rules on preferential origin shall be adopted in accordance with Article 203 TFEU. 6. Upon its own initiative or at the request of a beneficiary country or territory, the Commission may, for certain goods, grant that country or territory a temporary derogation from the rules on preferential origin referred to in paragraph 3. The temporary derogation shall be justified by one of the following reasons: (a) internal or external factors temporarily deprive the beneficiary country or territory of the ability to comply with the rules on preferential origin; (b) the beneficiary country or territory requires time to prepare itself to comply with those rules. A request for derogation shall be made in writing to the Commission by the beneficiary country or territory concerned. The request shall state the reasons, as indicated in the second subparagraph, why derogation is required and shall contain appropriate supporting documents. The temporary derogation shall be limited to the duration of the effects of the internal or external factors giving rise to it or the length of time needed for the beneficiary country or territory to achieve compliance with the rules. Where a derogation is granted, the beneficiary country or territory concerned shall comply with any requirements laid down as to information to be provided to the Commission concerning the use of the derogation and the management of the quantities for which the derogation is granted.
Amendment rationale: CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL Reasons for and objectives of the proposal The provisions of the Union Customs Code 1 (the Code) are being applied since 1 May 2016. A major goal of the Code is the shift to a complete use of electronic systems for interactions between economic operators and customs authorities, and between customs authorities, and the end of paper-based customs processes. The Code provides that different customs processes should be covered by electronic systems while also providing that the details of and planning for such systems should be set out in a separate Work Programme. The UCC Work Programme 2 draws up planning for seventeen UCC electronic systems in total, on the basis of the Multi-Annual Strategic Plan (MASP) for all electronic customs projects that is prepared and updated regularly in accordance with a 2008 Decision 3 of the European Parliament and the Council . The systems can be divided into two categories: (a) fourteen trans-European systems including some systems that have national components for development by the Member States and (b) three national systems that have to be developed or upgraded by the Member States alone. Article 278 of the Code provides that, until all the new electronic systems envisaged under the Code are operational, existing electronic and paper-based systems can continue to be used for customs processes. The Article establishes the end of 2020, at the latest, as the date by which the use of these transitional arrangements must cease. In line with this deadline, the Work Programme sets out step-by-step plans for completion of the work on the electronic systems by 2020. The Commission and the Member States are on track to finish the major part of the work on the electronic systems on time. In 2017 three of the seventeen systems were implemented and a first phase of another system was completed, all by their scheduled dates. In effect, close to eighty per cent of the Commission's work on the trans-European systems provided for under the Work Programme will be completed by that date. However, the last phases of development of IT systems are often the longest and therefore, while most systems will be completed by 2020, some will only be partially completed. There are many challenges for both the Commission and Member States in this work of implementing seventeen electronic systems. These challenges, that were impossible to predict at the time the deadline was set, include the following: · The unavoidable delay in completing the design of the electronic systems. When setting the 2020 deadline, it was anticipated that the rules supplementing and implementing the UCC (the UCC Delegated Regulation, 4 the UCC Implementing Regulation 5 and the UCC Transitional Delegated Regulation 6 ) would be adopted very soon after the adoption of the UCC in 2013, so that their provisions could be taken into account in developing the IT systems. However, as it happened, discussions took much longer than expected and the acts were only adopted in their final form in late 2015/early 2016. This delay meant a delay in producing the functional and technical specifications for many of the electronic systems. · The enormity of the work of interlinking seventeen electronic systems across the whole of the EU and the particular complexity of some of the electronic systems. These elements only became apparent as work started on the functional and technical specifications for the systems. Having the full picture following the work on the specifications has led the Commission and Member States to the conclusion that a revision of the target date for completion of the systems is necessary in some cases. This is particularly true for those electronic systems for which the specifications will only be completed in 2018. · Data harmonisation difficulties. Since the adoption of the Delegated Regulation and the Implementing Regulation, work is also proceeding at an intensive pace on harmonisation of the data provided by economic operators. This element is crucial for the interoperability of the different UCC electronic systems, for a harmonised application of the legal rules and for cooperation with other public services active at the border. Harmonising the data in line with international data models such as that of the World Customs Organisation also ensures better linkages with the IT systems of third countries and thus greatly facilitates trade. However, this work involves a much heavier than expected investment in terms of time and in financial terms in fully reprogramming some of the existing electronic systems. · Sequencing. When planning realistic timelines and costs, close attention must be paid to the impact of the proposed electronic changes on the customs and trade eco-system. As the electronic systems are closely interlinked, it is important to introduce them in the right order (sequencing) so as to ensure that interdependencies are respected and that the changes for administrations and trade are introduced in a structured and coherent manner. For all of these reasons, it has become necessary to provide for a later date (2025 at the latest) for full completion of work on some of the systems. This target date will ensure the smooth implementation by 2020 of the majority of the systems and the later implementation of the remaining systems, in proper sequence, on dates between 2021 and 2025. Half of the systems for which implementation is to be delayed already exist and are merely being upgraded under the UCC while the other half are new systems. The systems to be postponed are as follows: · Upgrades for which the main technical challenge is the harmonisation of data i.e. the upgrades of the Import Control System (ICS), the New Computerised Transit System (NCTS), the Automated Export System (AES) and the National Export System (including the export component of the national Special Procedures System); and · Three new systems which are designed to apply innovative features of the Code i.e. Centralised Clearance for Import (CCI), Proof of Union Status (PoUS) and Guarantee Management (GUM). The postponement to 2025 of the latest delivery date for these electronic systems conflicts with Article 278 of the Code which only allows the use of means for the exchange and storage of information other than the planned electronic systems until 2020. Therefore, the deadline in Article 278 must be extended in respect of the delayed systems. Furthermore, action must be taken quickly in order to ensure legal certainty; business and customs administrations would have serious problems if, by 2020, some of the electronic systems were not implemented and at the same time the law prohibited the continued transitional use of alternative arrangements. As Member States and businesses need on average two years to make arrangements for each electronic system, the Commission has to provide certainty by 2018 about the re-planning for some of the systems and the related extension of the applicability of transitional arrangements after 2020 up to 2025.
Revised version (Article 64 Preferential origin of goods):
2. In the case of goods benefiting from preferential measures contained in agreements which the Union has concluded with certain countries or territories outside the customs territory of the Union or with groups of such countries or territories, the rules on preferential origin shall be laid down in those agreements. 3. In the case of goods benefiting from preferential measures adopted unilaterally by the Union in respect of certain countries or territories outside the customs territory of the Union or groups of such countries or territories, other than those referred to in paragraph 5, the Commission shall adopt measures laying down the rules on preferential origin. Those rules shall be based either on the criterion that goods are wholly obtained or on the criterion that goods result from sufficient processing or working. 4. In the case of goods benefiting from preferential measures applicable in trade between the customs territory of the Union and Ceuta and Melilla, as contained in Protocol 2 to the 1985 Act of Accession, the rules on preferential origin shall be adopted in accordance with Article 9 of that Protocol. 5. In the case of goods benefiting from preferential measures contained in preferential arrangements in favour of the overseas countries and territories associated with the Union, the rules on preferential origin shall be adopted in accordance with Article 203 TFEU. 6. Upon its own initiative or at the request of a beneficiary country or territory, the Commission may, for certain goods, grant that country or territory a temporary derogation from the rules on preferential origin referred to in paragraph 3. The temporary derogation shall be justified by one of the following reasons: (a) internal or external factors temporarily deprive the beneficiary country or territory of the ability to comply with the rules on preferential origin; (b) the beneficiary country or territory requires time to prepare itself to comply with those rules. A request for derogation shall be made in writing to the Commission by the beneficiary country or territory concerned. The request shall state the reasons, as indicated in the second subparagraph, why derogation is required and shall contain appropriate supporting documents. The temporary derogation shall be limited to the duration of the effects of the internal or external factors giving rise to it or the length of time needed for the beneficiary country or territory to achieve compliance with the rules. Where a derogation is granted, the beneficiary country or territory concerned shall comply with any requirements laid down as to information to be provided to the Commission concerning the use of the derogation and the management of the quantities for which the derogation is granted.
Article 65 Delegation of power
The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 284, laying down the rules on preferential origin referred to in Article 64(3).
Article 66 Conferral of implementing powers
The Commission shall adopt by means of implementing acts: (a) the procedural rules, referred to in Article 64(1), to facilitate the establishment in the Union of the preferential origin of goods; (b) a measure granting a beneficiary country or territory the temporary derogation referred to in Article 64(6). Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 285(4).
Article 67 Measures taken by the Commission
The Commission may adopt measures to determine the origin of specific goods in accordance with the rules of origin applicable to those goods.
Article 68 Conferral of implementing powers
The Commission shall adopt, by means of implementing acts, the measures referred to in Article 67. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 285(4). On imperative grounds of urgency relating to such measures, duly justified by the need to rapidly ensure the correct and uniform application of rules of origin, the Commission shall adopt immediately applicable implementing acts in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 285(5). Where the opinion of the committee referred to in Article 285(1) is to be obtained by written procedure, Article 285(6) shall apply.
Article 69 Scope
The customs value of goods, for the purposes of applying the Common Customs Tariff and non-tariff measures laid down by Union provisions governing specific fields relating to trade in goods, shall be determined in accordance with Articles 70 and 74.
Article 70 Method of customs valuation based on the transaction value
1. The primary basis for the customs value of goods shall be the transaction value, that is the price actually paid or payable for the goods when sold for export to the customs territory of the Union, adjusted, where necessary. 2. The price actually paid or payable shall be the total payment made or to be made by the buyer to the seller or by the buyer to a third party for the benefit of the seller for the imported goods and include all payments made or to be made as a condition of sale of the imported goods. 3. The transaction value shall apply provided that all of the following conditions are fulfilled: (a) there are no restrictions as to the disposal or use of the goods by the buyer, other than any of the following: (i) restrictions imposed or required by a law or by the public authorities in the Union; (ii) limitations of the geographical area in which the goods may be resold; (iii) restrictions which do not substantially affect the customs value of the goods; (a) there are no restrictions as to the disposal or use of the goods by the buyer, other than any of the following: (i) restrictions imposed or required by a law or by the public authorities in the Union; (ii) limitations of the geographical area in which the goods may be resold; (iii) restrictions which do not substantially affect the customs value of the goods; (b) the sale or price is not subject to some condition or consideration for which a value cannot be determined with respect to the goods being valued; (c) no part of the proceeds of any subsequent resale, disposal or use of the goods by the buyer will accrue directly or indirectly to the seller, unless an appropriate adjustment can be made; (d) the buyer and seller are not related or the relationship did not influence the price.
Amendment rationale: CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL Reasons for and objectives of the proposal Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 October 2013 laying down the Union Customs Code (UCC) 1 aims at facilitating legitimate trade while ensuring appropriate customs supervision and the fight against fraud. The UCC entered into force on 30 October 2013, but it applies in its entirety from 1 May 2016. This proposal aims at modifying Article 136 UCC in order to ensure the effective application of other UCC provisions, notably those on customs supervision. This amendment should enter into force as soon as possible so as to contribute to effective customs supervision. With a view to facilitating trade flows, Article 136 UCC states that certain provisions (in particular those governing the obligations to lodge the entry summary declaration, to notify the arrival of a sea-going vessel or an aircraft, to convey and present the goods to customs upon unloading or transhipment and to wait authorisation before unloading or transhipping the goods, and those governing temporary storage) do not apply to goods that have temporarily left the Union customs territory while moving by direct route between two points of that territory by sea or air without a stop outside the Union. However, the disapplication of those provisions may put at risk the effective customs supervision of these goods. Article 136 UCC does not eliminate the requirement laid down in Article 134 UCC for goods brought into the customs territory of the Union to be subject to customs supervision and, where appropriate, to customs controls. However, the current text of Article 136 has the consequence that there is no clear legal basis to require presentation of these goods to the customs authorities. In the absence of such presentation, the supervision by the customs authorities of non-Union goods and of Union goods whose status must be proven may become more difficult. The customs authorities in these subsequent ports or airports must have the opportunity to ensure the complete and correct levying of import duty and other charges, or the correct application of non-fiscal measures (e.g. veterinary or phytosanitary controls) as well as identifying risks on goods arriving in their ports or airports. In order to ensure the proper application of other UCC provisions, notably those on customs supervision, it is therefore indispensable to propose a modification to the scope of Article 136 UCC, distinguishing between non-Union and Union goods, as follows: (1) First, the only provisions not applying when non-Union goods re-enter the Union customs territory after having temporarily left it by direct sea or air route, should be: (1) The rules governing the obligation to lodge the entry summary declaration (Articles 127 to 130 UCC) and (2) The rules governing the obligation to notify the arrival of a sea-going vessel or aircraft to the customs office of first entry to the Union customs territory (Article 133 UCC). (3) By contrast, the provisions governing the obligation to convey the goods to a certain place, to present them to customs upon unloading or transhipment, to wait for authorisation before unloading or transhipping, and the provisions on temporary storage should apply in these situations, thereby allowing appropriate customs supervision. (2) Second, the situation should be similar for Union goods whose status needs to be proven pursuant to Article 153(2) UCC, to the extent that the customs authorities must be able to check the proof of their Union status. (3) Third, the rules not applying to Union goods that have retained their status by virtue of Article 155(2) UCC can in addition include the rules governing the obligation to present the goods to customs upon unloading or transhipment, and the obligation to wait for authorisation before unloading or transhipping the goods (139 to 140 UCC). This is due to the fact that, even if the goods have temporarily left the Union customs territory, their status has not been altered and does not need to be proven. (4) Finally, certain references should be deleted from Article 136 UCC, as follows: (1) The reference to Articles 135(1) and 137 UCC should be deleted from because the goods should be conveyed to certain places designated by the customs authorities in any event; (2) The reference to Article 141 UCC should be deleted because Article 141(1) should continue to be applicable to goods moved under the transit procedure when they re-enter the customs Union. (3) The reference to Articles 144 to 149 UCC should be deleted because the provisions on temporary storage do not apply to Union goods in any event and their application for non-Union goods was excluded by mistake. 
Revised version (Article 70 Method of customs valuation based on the transaction value):
1. The primary basis for the customs value of goods shall be the transaction value, that is the price actually paid or payable for the goods when sold for export to the customs territory of the Union, adjusted, where necessary. 2. The price actually paid or payable shall be the total payment made or to be made by the buyer to the seller or by the buyer to a third party for the benefit of the seller for the imported goods and include all payments made or to be made as a condition of sale of the imported goods. 3. The transaction value shall apply provided that all of the following conditions are fulfilled: (a) there are no restrictions as to the disposal or use of the goods by the buyer, other than any of the following: (i) restrictions imposed or required by a law or by the public authorities in the Union; (ii) limitations of the geographical area in which the goods may be resold; (iii) restrictions which do not substantially affect the customs value of the goods; (b) the sale or price is not subject to some condition or consideration for which a value cannot be determined with respect to the goods being valued; (c) no part of the proceeds of any subsequent resale, disposal or use of the goods by the buyer will accrue directly or indirectly to the seller, unless an appropriate adjustment can be made; (d) the buyer and seller are not related or the relationship did not influence the price.