Article 1 Objective and scope
1. This Regulation establishes the procedures and conditions for issuing visas for transit through or intended stays in the territory of the Member States not exceeding three months in any six-month period. 2. The provisions of this Regulation shall apply to any third-country national who must be in possession of a visa when crossing the external borders of the Member States pursuant to Council Regulation (EC) No 539/2001 of 15 March 2001 listing the third countries whose nationals must be in possession of visas when crossing the external borders and those whose nationals are exempt from that requirement ( 17 ), without prejudice to: (a) the rights of free movement enjoyed by third-country nationals who are family members of citizens of the Union; (b) the equivalent rights enjoyed by third-country nationals and their family members, who, under agreements between the Community and its Member States, on the one hand, and these third countries, on the other, enjoy rights of free movement equivalent to those of Union citizens and members of their families. 3. This Regulation also lists the third countries whose nationals are required to hold an airport transit visa by way of exception from the principle of free transit laid down in Annex 9 to the Chicago Convention on International Civil Aviation, and establishes the procedures and conditions for issuing visas for the purpose of transit through the international transit areas of Member States’ airports.
Amendment rationale: CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL Grounds for and objectives of the proposal This proposal contains a number of amendments to Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2006 establishing a Community Code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders (Schengen Borders Code). These are the result of the experience gained during the first years of its application. The proposal also contains some closely related modifications to the Convention implementing the Schengen Agreement of 14 June 1985. General context On 13 October 2006, Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2006 establishing a Community Code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders (Schengen Borders Code) entered into force. After four years of practical application, the need for a number of limited technical amendments has emerged. The main sources for these amendments are: - practical experiences of the Member States and the Commission in the application of the Schengen Borders Code, including the results of Schengen evaluations and the reports and requests submitted by Member States; - the Commission report of September 2009 on the operation of the provisions on stamping of the travel documents of third-country nationals in accordance with Articles 10 and 11 of the Schengen Borders Code (COM(2009) 489); - the Commission report of 13 October 2010 on the application of Title III (Internal Borders) of the Schengen Borders Code (COM(2010) 554); - consistency considerations linked to other recently adopted legislation, in particular the Visa Code (Regulation (EC) No 810/2009 of 13 July 2009) and the Return Directive (Directive 2008/115/EC of 16 December 2008). This proposal contains amendments that improve clarity and narrow the scope for divergent interpretations of the existing text as well as amendments responding to practical problems that have arisen during the first years of the Schengen Borders Code. Furthermore it provides for an explicit legal framework for bilateral agreements related to joint border checks on road traffic New policy initiatives, such as the creation of an EU Entry/Exit System and an EU Registered Traveller Programme, will be the subject of specific proposals to be discussed separately.
Revised version (Article 1 Objective and scope):
1. This Regulation establishes the procedures and conditions for issuing visas for transit through or intended stays on the territory of the Member States not exceeding 90 days in any 180-day period. 2. The provisions of this Regulation shall apply to any third-country national who must be in possession of a visa when crossing the external borders of the Member States pursuant to Council Regulation (EC) No 539/2001 of 15 March 2001 listing the third countries whose nationals must be in possession of visas when crossing the external borders and those whose nationals are exempt from that requirement ( 17 ), without prejudice to: (a) the rights of free movement enjoyed by third-country nationals who are family members of citizens of the Union; (b) the equivalent rights enjoyed by third-country nationals and their family members, who, under agreements between the Community and its Member States, on the one hand, and these third countries, on the other, enjoy rights of free movement equivalent to those of Union citizens and members of their families. 3. This Regulation also lists the third countries whose nationals are required to hold an airport transit visa by way of exception from the principle of free transit laid down in Annex 9 to the Chicago Convention on International Civil Aviation, and establishes the procedures and conditions for issuing visas for the purpose of transit through the international transit areas of Member States’ airports.
Article 2 Definitions
For the purpose of this Regulation the following definitions shall apply: 1. ‘third-country national’ means any person who is not a citizen of the Union within the meaning of Article 17(1) of the Treaty; 2. ‘visa’ means an authorisation issued by a Member State with a view to: (a) transit through or an intended stay in the territory of the Member States of a duration of no more than three months in any six-month period from the date of first entry in the territory of the Member States; (b) transit through the international transit areas of airports of the Member States; 2. ‘visa’ means an authorisation issued by a Member State with a view to: (a) transit through or an intended stay in the territory of the Member States of a duration of no more than three months in any six-month period from the date of first entry in the territory of the Member States; (b) transit through the international transit areas of airports of the Member States; 3. ‘uniform visa’ means a visa valid for the entire territory of the Member States; 4. ‘visa with limited territorial validity’ means a visa valid for the territory of one or more Member States but not all Member States; 5. ‘airport transit visa’ means a visa valid for transit through the international transit areas of one or more airports of the Member States; 6. ‘visa sticker’ means the uniform format for visas as defined by Council Regulation (EC) No 1683/95 of 29 May 1995 laying down a uniform format for visas ( 18 ); 7. ‘recognised travel document’ means a travel document recognised by one or more Member States for the purpose of affixing visas; 8. ‘separate sheet for affixing a visa’ means the uniform format for forms for affixing the visa issued by Member States to persons holding travel documents not recognised by the Member State drawing up the form as defined by Council Regulation (EC) No 333/2002 of 18 February 2002 on a uniform format for forms for affixing the visa issued by Member States to persons holding travel documents not recognised by the Member State drawing up the form ( 19 ); 9. ‘consulate’ means a Member State’s diplomatic mission or a Member State’s consular post authorised to issue visas and headed by a career consular officer as defined by the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations of 24 April 1963; 10. ‘application’ means an application for a visa; 11. ‘commercial intermediary’ means a private administrative agency, transport company or travel agency (tour operator or retailer).
Amendment rationale: CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL Grounds for and objectives of the proposal This proposal contains a number of amendments to Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2006 establishing a Community Code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders (Schengen Borders Code). These are the result of the experience gained during the first years of its application. The proposal also contains some closely related modifications to the Convention implementing the Schengen Agreement of 14 June 1985. General context On 13 October 2006, Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2006 establishing a Community Code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders (Schengen Borders Code) entered into force. After four years of practical application, the need for a number of limited technical amendments has emerged. The main sources for these amendments are: - practical experiences of the Member States and the Commission in the application of the Schengen Borders Code, including the results of Schengen evaluations and the reports and requests submitted by Member States; - the Commission report of September 2009 on the operation of the provisions on stamping of the travel documents of third-country nationals in accordance with Articles 10 and 11 of the Schengen Borders Code (COM(2009) 489); - the Commission report of 13 October 2010 on the application of Title III (Internal Borders) of the Schengen Borders Code (COM(2010) 554); - consistency considerations linked to other recently adopted legislation, in particular the Visa Code (Regulation (EC) No 810/2009 of 13 July 2009) and the Return Directive (Directive 2008/115/EC of 16 December 2008). This proposal contains amendments that improve clarity and narrow the scope for divergent interpretations of the existing text as well as amendments responding to practical problems that have arisen during the first years of the Schengen Borders Code. Furthermore it provides for an explicit legal framework for bilateral agreements related to joint border checks on road traffic New policy initiatives, such as the creation of an EU Entry/Exit System and an EU Registered Traveller Programme, will be the subject of specific proposals to be discussed separately.
Revised version (Article 2 Definitions):
For the purpose of this Regulation the following definitions shall apply: 1. ‘third-country national’ means any person who is not a citizen of the Union within the meaning of Article 17(1) of the Treaty; 2. ‘visa’ means an authorisation issued by a Member State with a view to: (a) transit through or an intended stay on the territory of the Member States of a duration of no more than 90 days in any 180-day period; (b) transit through the international transit areas of airports of the Member States; 2. ‘visa’ means an authorisation issued by a Member State with a view to: (a) transit through or an intended stay on the territory of the Member States of a duration of no more than 90 days in any 180-day period; (b) transit through the international transit areas of airports of the Member States; 3. ‘uniform visa’ means a visa valid for the entire territory of the Member States; 4. ‘visa with limited territorial validity’ means a visa valid for the territory of one or more Member States but not all Member States; 5. ‘airport transit visa’ means a visa valid for transit through the international transit areas of one or more airports of the Member States; 6. ‘visa sticker’ means the uniform format for visas as defined by Council Regulation (EC) No 1683/95 of 29 May 1995 laying down a uniform format for visas ( 18 ); 7. ‘recognised travel document’ means a travel document recognised by one or more Member States for the purpose of affixing visas; 8. ‘separate sheet for affixing a visa’ means the uniform format for forms for affixing the visa issued by Member States to persons holding travel documents not recognised by the Member State drawing up the form as defined by Council Regulation (EC) No 333/2002 of 18 February 2002 on a uniform format for forms for affixing the visa issued by Member States to persons holding travel documents not recognised by the Member State drawing up the form ( 19 ); 9. ‘consulate’ means a Member State’s diplomatic mission or a Member State’s consular post authorised to issue visas and headed by a career consular officer as defined by the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations of 24 April 1963; 10. ‘application’ means an application for a visa; 11. ‘commercial intermediary’ means a private administrative agency, transport company or travel agency (tour operator or retailer).
Article 3 Third-country nationals required to hold an airport transit visa
1. Nationals of the third countries listed in Annex IV shall be required to hold an airport transit visa when passing through the international transit areas of airports situated on the territory of the Member States. 2. In urgent cases of mass influx of illegal immigrants, individual Member States may require nationals of third countries other than those referred to in paragraph 1 to hold an airport transit visa when passing through the international transit areas of airports situated on their territory. Member States shall notify the Commission of such decisions before their entry into force and of withdrawals of such an airport transit visa requirement. 3. Within the framework of the Committee referred to in Article 52(1), those notifications shall be reviewed on an annual basis for the purpose of transferring the third country concerned to the list set out in Annex IV. 4. If the third country is not transferred to the list set out in Annex IV, the Member State concerned may maintain, provided that the conditions in paragraph 2 are met, or withdraw the airport transit visa requirement. 5. The following categories of persons shall be exempt from the requirement to hold an airport transit visa provided for in paragraphs 1 and 2: (a) holders of a valid uniform visa, national long-stay visa or residence permit issued by a Member State; (b) third-country nationals holding a valid residence permit issued by a Member State which does not take part in the adoption of this Regulation or by a Member State which does not yet apply the provisions of the Schengen acquis in full, or third-country nationals holding one of the valid residence permits listed in Annex V issued by Andorra, Canada, Japan, San Marino or the United States of America guaranteeing the holder’s unconditional readmission; (c) third-country nationals holding a valid visa for a Member State which does not take part in the adoption of this Regulation, for a Member State which does not yet apply the provisions of the Schengen acquis in full, or for Canada, Japan or the United States of America, when travelling to the issuing country or to any other third country, or when, having used the visa, returning from the issuing country; (d) family members of citizens of the Union as referred to in Article 1(2)(a); (e) holders of diplomatic passports; (f) flight crew members who are nationals of a contracting Party to the Chicago Convention on International Civil Aviation.
Amendment rationale: CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL Reasons for and objectives of the proposal The Visa Code is a core element of the common visa policy: it establishes harmonised procedures and conditions for processing visa applications and issuing visas. It entered into force on 5 April 2010, with the overarching objectives of facilitating legitimate travel and tackling irregular immigration, enhancing transparency and legal certainty, strengthening procedural guarantees and reinforcing equal treatment of visa applicants. The Visa Code required the Commission to submit to the European Parliament and the Council an evaluation of its implementation two years after all the provisions of the Regulation had become applicable. It presented its evaluation in a report 1 and accompanying staff working document 2 on 1 April 2014. On the basis of this evaluation, on the same date the Commission adopted a proposal 3 for a recast of the Visa Code with the aim of enhancing travel to the EU through visa policy facilitations (thereby to contributing to tourism, trade, growth and employment in the EU) and to harmonising implementation of the common rules. However, due to divergences in the positions of the European Parliament and the Council, negotiations have not progressed. Meanwhile, greater security and migratory challenges have made it clear that the approach followed in 2014 no longer matches reality. T hese factors prompte d the Commission to announce the withdrawal of its recast proposal in the Commission Work programme for 2018 4 . The formal withdrawal will take place in April 2018. While migration- and security-related objectives have become increasingly important, one should not lose sight of the fact that the vast majority of visa applicants pose no security and/or migratory risk to the EU and are bringing significant benefits to the EU. Therefore, this proposal focuses on streamlining and improving operational aspects of the visa procedure and takes account of the results of negotiations on the Visa Code recast proposal. New elements have been added which were advanced in the Commission's September 2017 Communication on the Delivery of the European Agenda on Migration 5 and in its consultations, such as the need for sufficient financial resources to support Member States' visa processing, clear rules on the issuing of multiple entry visas with a long period of validity and the leverage role that visa policy can exert in the EU's readmission policy. The Commission’s proposal for the reform of the Visa Information System legal framework (to be presented in spring 2018) will further enhance the security and efficiency of the visa procedure, in particular by taking account of technological developments and harnessing them to the benefit of Member States' authorities and bona fide applicants, closing information gaps in some areas, enhancing checks on persons and speeding up the quality and outcome of the procedure.
Revised version (Article 3 Third-country nationals required to hold an airport transit visa):
1. Nationals of the third countries listed in Annex IV shall be required to hold an airport transit visa when passing through the international transit areas of airports situated on the territory of the Member States. 2. In urgent cases of mass influx of illegal immigrants, individual Member States may require nationals of third countries other than those referred to in paragraph 1 to hold an airport transit visa when passing through the international transit areas of airports situated on their territory. Member States shall notify the Commission of such decisions before their entry into force and of withdrawals of such an airport transit visa requirement. 3. Within the framework of the Committee referred to in Article 52(1), those notifications shall be reviewed on an annual basis for the purpose of transferring the third country concerned to the list set out in Annex IV. 4. If the third country is not transferred to the list set out in Annex IV, the Member State concerned may maintain, provided that the conditions in paragraph 2 are met, or withdraw the airport transit visa requirement.
Article 4 Authorities competent for taking part in the procedures relating to applications
1. Applications shall be examined and decided on by consulates. 2. By way of derogation from paragraph 1, applications may be examined and decided on at the external borders of the Member States by the authorities responsible for checks on persons, in accordance with Articles 35 and 36. 3. In the non-European overseas territories of Member States, applications may be examined and decided on by the authorities designated by the Member State concerned. 4. A Member State may require the involvement of authorities other than the ones designated in paragraphs 1 and 2 in the examination of and decision on applications. 5. A Member State may require to be consulted or informed by another Member State in accordance with Articles 22 and 31.
Amendment rationale: CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL Reasons for and objectives of the proposal The Visa Code is a core element of the common visa policy: it establishes harmonised procedures and conditions for processing visa applications and issuing visas. It entered into force on 5 April 2010, with the overarching objectives of facilitating legitimate travel and tackling irregular immigration, enhancing transparency and legal certainty, strengthening procedural guarantees and reinforcing equal treatment of visa applicants. The Visa Code required the Commission to submit to the European Parliament and the Council an evaluation of its implementation two years after all the provisions of the Regulation had become applicable. It presented its evaluation in a report 1 and accompanying staff working document 2 on 1 April 2014. On the basis of this evaluation, on the same date the Commission adopted a proposal 3 for a recast of the Visa Code with the aim of enhancing travel to the EU through visa policy facilitations (thereby to contributing to tourism, trade, growth and employment in the EU) and to harmonising implementation of the common rules. However, due to divergences in the positions of the European Parliament and the Council, negotiations have not progressed. Meanwhile, greater security and migratory challenges have made it clear that the approach followed in 2014 no longer matches reality. T hese factors prompte d the Commission to announce the withdrawal of its recast proposal in the Commission Work programme for 2018 4 . The formal withdrawal will take place in April 2018. While migration- and security-related objectives have become increasingly important, one should not lose sight of the fact that the vast majority of visa applicants pose no security and/or migratory risk to the EU and are bringing significant benefits to the EU. Therefore, this proposal focuses on streamlining and improving operational aspects of the visa procedure and takes account of the results of negotiations on the Visa Code recast proposal. New elements have been added which were advanced in the Commission's September 2017 Communication on the Delivery of the European Agenda on Migration 5 and in its consultations, such as the need for sufficient financial resources to support Member States' visa processing, clear rules on the issuing of multiple entry visas with a long period of validity and the leverage role that visa policy can exert in the EU's readmission policy. The Commission’s proposal for the reform of the Visa Information System legal framework (to be presented in spring 2018) will further enhance the security and efficiency of the visa procedure, in particular by taking account of technological developments and harnessing them to the benefit of Member States' authorities and bona fide applicants, closing information gaps in some areas, enhancing checks on persons and speeding up the quality and outcome of the procedure.
Revised version (Article 4 Authorities competent for taking part in the procedures relating to applications):
1. Applications shall be examined and decided on by consulates. 1a. By way of derogation from paragraph 1, Member States may decide that applications are examined and decided on by central authorities. Member States shall ensure that those authorities have sufficient knowledge of local circumstances of the country where the application is lodged in order to assess the migratory and security risk, as well as sufficient knowledge of the language to analyse documents, and that consulates are involved, where necessary, to conduct additional examination and interviews. 2. By way of derogation from paragraph 1, applications may be examined and decided on at the external borders of the Member States by the authorities responsible for checks on persons, in accordance with Articles 35 and 36. 3. In the non-European overseas territories of Member States, applications may be examined and decided on by the authorities designated by the Member State concerned. 4. A Member State may require the involvement of authorities other than the ones designated in paragraphs 1 and 2 in the examination of and decision on applications. 5. A Member State may require to be consulted or informed by another Member State in accordance with Articles 22 and 31.
Article 5 Member State competent for examining and deciding on an application
1. The Member State competent for examining and deciding on an application for a uniform visa shall be: (a) the Member State whose territory constitutes the sole destination of the visit(s); (b) if the visit includes more than one destination, the Member State whose territory constitutes the main destination of the visit(s) in terms of the length or purpose of stay; or (c) if no main destination can be determined, the Member State whose external border the applicant intends to cross in order to enter the territory of the Member States. 2. The Member State competent for examining and deciding on an application for a uniform visa for the purpose of transit shall be: (a) in the case of transit through only one Member State, the Member State concerned; or (b) in the case of transit through several Member States, the Member State whose external border the applicant intends to cross to start the transit. 3. The Member State competent for examining and deciding on an application for an airport transit visa shall be: (a) in the case of a single airport transit, the Member State on whose territory the transit airport is situated; or (b) in the case of double or multiple airport transit, the Member State on whose territory the first transit airport is situated. 4. Member States shall cooperate to prevent a situation in which an application cannot be examined and decided on because the Member State that is competent in accordance with paragraphs 1 to 3 is neither present nor represented in the third country where the applicant lodges the application in accordance with Article 6.
Amendment rationale: CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL Reasons for and objectives of the proposal The Visa Code is a core element of the common visa policy: it establishes harmonised procedures and conditions for processing visa applications and issuing visas. It entered into force on 5 April 2010, with the overarching objectives of facilitating legitimate travel and tackling irregular immigration, enhancing transparency and legal certainty, strengthening procedural guarantees and reinforcing equal treatment of visa applicants. The Visa Code required the Commission to submit to the European Parliament and the Council an evaluation of its implementation two years after all the provisions of the Regulation had become applicable. It presented its evaluation in a report 1 and accompanying staff working document 2 on 1 April 2014. On the basis of this evaluation, on the same date the Commission adopted a proposal 3 for a recast of the Visa Code with the aim of enhancing travel to the EU through visa policy facilitations (thereby to contributing to tourism, trade, growth and employment in the EU) and to harmonising implementation of the common rules. However, due to divergences in the positions of the European Parliament and the Council, negotiations have not progressed. Meanwhile, greater security and migratory challenges have made it clear that the approach followed in 2014 no longer matches reality. T hese factors prompte d the Commission to announce the withdrawal of its recast proposal in the Commission Work programme for 2018 4 . The formal withdrawal will take place in April 2018. While migration- and security-related objectives have become increasingly important, one should not lose sight of the fact that the vast majority of visa applicants pose no security and/or migratory risk to the EU and are bringing significant benefits to the EU. Therefore, this proposal focuses on streamlining and improving operational aspects of the visa procedure and takes account of the results of negotiations on the Visa Code recast proposal. New elements have been added which were advanced in the Commission's September 2017 Communication on the Delivery of the European Agenda on Migration 5 and in its consultations, such as the need for sufficient financial resources to support Member States' visa processing, clear rules on the issuing of multiple entry visas with a long period of validity and the leverage role that visa policy can exert in the EU's readmission policy. The Commission’s proposal for the reform of the Visa Information System legal framework (to be presented in spring 2018) will further enhance the security and efficiency of the visa procedure, in particular by taking account of technological developments and harnessing them to the benefit of Member States' authorities and bona fide applicants, closing information gaps in some areas, enhancing checks on persons and speeding up the quality and outcome of the procedure.
Revised version (Article 5 Member State competent for examining and deciding on an application):
2. The Member State competent for examining and deciding on an application for a uniform visa for the purpose of transit shall be: (a) in the case of transit through only one Member State, the Member State concerned; or (b) in the case of transit through several Member States, the Member State whose external border the applicant intends to cross to start the transit. 3. The Member State competent for examining and deciding on an application for an airport transit visa shall be: (a) in the case of a single airport transit, the Member State on whose territory the transit airport is situated; or (b) in the case of double or multiple airport transit, the Member State on whose territory the first transit airport is situated. 4. Member States shall cooperate to prevent a situation in which an application cannot be examined and decided on because the Member State that is competent in accordance with paragraphs 1 to 3 is neither present nor represented in the third country where the applicant lodges the application in accordance with Article 6.
Article 6 Consular territorial competence
1. An application shall be examined and decided on by the consulate of the competent Member State in whose jurisdiction the applicant legally resides. 2. A consulate of the competent Member State shall examine and decide on an application lodged by a third-country national legally present but not residing in its jurisdiction, if the applicant has provided justification for lodging the application at that consulate.
Article 7 Competence to issue visas to third-country nationals legally present within the territory of a Member State
Third-country nationals who are legally present in the territory of a Member State and who are required to hold a visa to enter the territory of one or more other Member States shall apply for a visa at the consulate of the Member State that is competent in accordance with Article 5(1) or (2).
Article 8 Representation arrangements
1. A Member State may agree to represent another Member State that is competent in accordance with Article 5 for the purpose of examining applications and issuing visas on behalf of that Member State. A Member State may also represent another Member State in a limited manner solely for the collection of applications and the enrolment of biometric identifiers. 2. The consulate of the representing Member State shall, when contemplating refusing a visa, submit the application to the relevant authorities of the represented Member State in order for them to take the final decision on the application within the time limits set out in Article 23(1), (2) or (3). 3. The collection and transmission of files and data to the represented Member State shall be carried out in compliance with the relevant data protection and security rules. 4. A bilateral arrangement shall be established between the representing Member State and the represented Member State containing the following elements: (a) it shall specify the duration of such representation, if only temporary, and procedures for its termination; (b) it may, in particular when the represented Member State has a consulate in the third country concerned, provide for the provision of premises, staff and payments by the represented Member State; (c) it may stipulate that applications from certain categories of third-country nationals are to be transmitted by the representing Member State to the central authorities of the represented Member State for prior consultation as provided for in Article 22; (d) by way of derogation from paragraph 2, it may authorise the consulate of the representing Member State to refuse to issue a visa after examination of the application. 5. Member States lacking their own consulate in a third country shall endeavour to conclude representation arrangements with Member States that have consulates in that country. 6. With a view to ensuring that a poor transport infrastructure or long distances in a specific region or geographical area does not require a disproportionate effort on the part of applicants to have access to a consulate, Member States lacking their own consulate in that region or area shall endeavour to conclude representation arrangements with Member States that have consulates in that region or area. 7. The represented Member State shall notify the representation arrangements or the termination of such arrangements to the Commission before they enter into force or are terminated. 8. Simultaneously, the consulate of the representing Member State shall inform both the consulates of other Member States and the delegation of the Commission in the jurisdiction concerned about representation arrangements or the termination of such arrangements before they enter into force or are terminated. 9. If the consulate of the representing Member State decides to cooperate with an external service provider in accordance with Article 43, or with accredited commercial intermediaries as provided for in Article 45, such cooperation shall include applications covered by representation arrangements. The central authorities of the represented Member State shall be informed in advance of the terms of such cooperation.
Amendment rationale: CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL Reasons for and objectives of the proposal The Visa Code is a core element of the common visa policy: it establishes harmonised procedures and conditions for processing visa applications and issuing visas. It entered into force on 5 April 2010, with the overarching objectives of facilitating legitimate travel and tackling irregular immigration, enhancing transparency and legal certainty, strengthening procedural guarantees and reinforcing equal treatment of visa applicants. The Visa Code required the Commission to submit to the European Parliament and the Council an evaluation of its implementation two years after all the provisions of the Regulation had become applicable. It presented its evaluation in a report 1 and accompanying staff working document 2 on 1 April 2014. On the basis of this evaluation, on the same date the Commission adopted a proposal 3 for a recast of the Visa Code with the aim of enhancing travel to the EU through visa policy facilitations (thereby to contributing to tourism, trade, growth and employment in the EU) and to harmonising implementation of the common rules. However, due to divergences in the positions of the European Parliament and the Council, negotiations have not progressed. Meanwhile, greater security and migratory challenges have made it clear that the approach followed in 2014 no longer matches reality. T hese factors prompte d the Commission to announce the withdrawal of its recast proposal in the Commission Work programme for 2018 4 . The formal withdrawal will take place in April 2018. While migration- and security-related objectives have become increasingly important, one should not lose sight of the fact that the vast majority of visa applicants pose no security and/or migratory risk to the EU and are bringing significant benefits to the EU. Therefore, this proposal focuses on streamlining and improving operational aspects of the visa procedure and takes account of the results of negotiations on the Visa Code recast proposal. New elements have been added which were advanced in the Commission's September 2017 Communication on the Delivery of the European Agenda on Migration 5 and in its consultations, such as the need for sufficient financial resources to support Member States' visa processing, clear rules on the issuing of multiple entry visas with a long period of validity and the leverage role that visa policy can exert in the EU's readmission policy. The Commission’s proposal for the reform of the Visa Information System legal framework (to be presented in spring 2018) will further enhance the security and efficiency of the visa procedure, in particular by taking account of technological developments and harnessing them to the benefit of Member States' authorities and bona fide applicants, closing information gaps in some areas, enhancing checks on persons and speeding up the quality and outcome of the procedure.
Revised version (Article 8 Representation arrangements):
1. A Member State may agree to represent another Member State that is competent in accordance with Article 5 for the purpose of examining and deciding on applications on behalf of that Member State. A Member State may also represent another Member State in a limited manner solely for the collection of applications and the enrolment of biometric identifiers. 3. Where the representation is limited in accordance with the second sentence of paragraph 1, the collection and the transmission of data to the represented Member State shall be carried out in compliance with the relevant data protection and security rules. 4. A bilateral arrangement shall be established between the representing Member State and the represented Member State. That arrangement: (a) shall specify the duration of the representation, if only temporary, and the procedures for its termination; (b) may, in particular where the represented Member State has a consulate in the third country concerned, provide for the provision of premises, staff and payments by the represented Member State. 5. Member States lacking their own consulate in a third country shall endeavour to conclude representation arrangements with Member States that have consulates in that country. 6. With a view to ensuring that a poor transport infrastructure or long distances in a specific region or geographical area does not require a disproportionate effort on the part of applicants to have access to a consulate, Member States lacking their own consulate in that region or area shall endeavour to conclude representation arrangements with Member States that have consulates in that region or area. 7. The represented Member State shall notify the Commission of the representation arrangements or the termination of those arrangements at the latest 20 calendar days before they enter into force or are terminated, except in cases of force majeure . 8. The consulate of the representing Member State shall, at the same time as the notification referred to in paragraph 7 takes place, inform both the consulates of other Member States and the Union delegation in the jurisdiction concerned about the representation arrangements or the termination of such arrangements. 9. If the consulate of the representing Member State decides to cooperate with an external service provider in accordance with Article 43, or with accredited commercial intermediaries as provided for in Article 45, such cooperation shall include applications covered by representation arrangements. The central authorities of the represented Member State shall be informed in advance of the terms of such cooperation. 10. If a Member State is neither present nor represented in the third country where the applicant is to lodge the application, that Member State shall endeavour to cooperate with an external service provider, in accordance with Article 43, in that third country. 11. Where a consulate of a Member State in a given location experiences a prolonged technical force majeure , that Member State shall seek temporary representation by another Member State in that location for all or some categories of applicants.
Article 9 Practical modalities for lodging an application
1. Applications shall be lodged no more than three months before the start of the intended visit. Holders of a multiple-entry visa may lodge the application before the expiry of the visa valid for a period of at least six months. 2. Applicants may be required to obtain an appointment for the lodging of an application. The appointment shall, as a rule, take place within a period of two weeks from the date when the appointment was requested. 3. In justified cases of urgency, the consulate may allow applicants to lodge their applications either without appointment, or an appointment shall be given immediately. 4. Applications may be lodged at the consulate by the applicant or by accredited commercial intermediaries, as provided for in Article 45(1), without prejudice to Article 13, or in accordance with Article 42 or 43.
Amendment rationale: CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL Reasons for and objectives of the proposal The Visa Code is a core element of the common visa policy: it establishes harmonised procedures and conditions for processing visa applications and issuing visas. It entered into force on 5 April 2010, with the overarching objectives of facilitating legitimate travel and tackling irregular immigration, enhancing transparency and legal certainty, strengthening procedural guarantees and reinforcing equal treatment of visa applicants. The Visa Code required the Commission to submit to the European Parliament and the Council an evaluation of its implementation two years after all the provisions of the Regulation had become applicable. It presented its evaluation in a report 1 and accompanying staff working document 2 on 1 April 2014. On the basis of this evaluation, on the same date the Commission adopted a proposal 3 for a recast of the Visa Code with the aim of enhancing travel to the EU through visa policy facilitations (thereby to contributing to tourism, trade, growth and employment in the EU) and to harmonising implementation of the common rules. However, due to divergences in the positions of the European Parliament and the Council, negotiations have not progressed. Meanwhile, greater security and migratory challenges have made it clear that the approach followed in 2014 no longer matches reality. T hese factors prompte d the Commission to announce the withdrawal of its recast proposal in the Commission Work programme for 2018 4 . The formal withdrawal will take place in April 2018. While migration- and security-related objectives have become increasingly important, one should not lose sight of the fact that the vast majority of visa applicants pose no security and/or migratory risk to the EU and are bringing significant benefits to the EU. Therefore, this proposal focuses on streamlining and improving operational aspects of the visa procedure and takes account of the results of negotiations on the Visa Code recast proposal. New elements have been added which were advanced in the Commission's September 2017 Communication on the Delivery of the European Agenda on Migration 5 and in its consultations, such as the need for sufficient financial resources to support Member States' visa processing, clear rules on the issuing of multiple entry visas with a long period of validity and the leverage role that visa policy can exert in the EU's readmission policy. The Commission’s proposal for the reform of the Visa Information System legal framework (to be presented in spring 2018) will further enhance the security and efficiency of the visa procedure, in particular by taking account of technological developments and harnessing them to the benefit of Member States' authorities and bona fide applicants, closing information gaps in some areas, enhancing checks on persons and speeding up the quality and outcome of the procedure.
Revised version (Article 9 Practical modalities for lodging an application):
1. Applications shall be lodged no more than six months, and for seafarers in the performance of their duties no more than nine months, before the start of the intended visit, and, as a rule, no later than 15 calendar days before the start of the intended visit. In justified individual cases of urgency, the consulate or the central authorities may allow the lodging of applications later than 15 calendar days before the start of the intended visit. 2. Applicants may be required to obtain an appointment for the lodging of an application. The appointment shall, as a rule, take place within a period of two weeks from the date when the appointment was requested. 3. In justified cases of urgency, the consulate may allow applicants to lodge their applications either without appointment, or an appointment shall be given immediately. 5. An applicant shall not be required to appear in person at more than one location in order to lodge an application.
Article 10 General rules for lodging an application
1. Without prejudice to the provisions of Articles 13, 42, 43 and 45, applicants shall appear in person when lodging an application. 2. Consulates may waive the requirement referred to in paragraph 1 when the applicant is known to them for his integrity and reliability. 3. When lodging the application, the applicant shall: (a) present an application form in accordance with Article 11; (b) present a travel document in accordance with Article 12; (c) present a photograph in accordance with the standards set out in Regulation (EC) No 1683/95 or, where the VIS is operational pursuant to Article 48 of the VIS Regulation, in accordance with the standards set out in Article 13 of this Regulation; (d) allow the collection of his fingerprints in accordance with Article 13, where applicable; (e) pay the visa fee in accordance with Article 16; (f) provide supporting documents in accordance with Article 14 and Annex II; (g) where applicable, produce proof of possession of adequate and valid travel medical insurance in accordance with Article 15.
Amendment rationale: CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL Reasons for and objectives of the proposal The Visa Code is a core element of the common visa policy: it establishes harmonised procedures and conditions for processing visa applications and issuing visas. It entered into force on 5 April 2010, with the overarching objectives of facilitating legitimate travel and tackling irregular immigration, enhancing transparency and legal certainty, strengthening procedural guarantees and reinforcing equal treatment of visa applicants. The Visa Code required the Commission to submit to the European Parliament and the Council an evaluation of its implementation two years after all the provisions of the Regulation had become applicable. It presented its evaluation in a report 1 and accompanying staff working document 2 on 1 April 2014. On the basis of this evaluation, on the same date the Commission adopted a proposal 3 for a recast of the Visa Code with the aim of enhancing travel to the EU through visa policy facilitations (thereby to contributing to tourism, trade, growth and employment in the EU) and to harmonising implementation of the common rules. However, due to divergences in the positions of the European Parliament and the Council, negotiations have not progressed. Meanwhile, greater security and migratory challenges have made it clear that the approach followed in 2014 no longer matches reality. T hese factors prompte d the Commission to announce the withdrawal of its recast proposal in the Commission Work programme for 2018 4 . The formal withdrawal will take place in April 2018. While migration- and security-related objectives have become increasingly important, one should not lose sight of the fact that the vast majority of visa applicants pose no security and/or migratory risk to the EU and are bringing significant benefits to the EU. Therefore, this proposal focuses on streamlining and improving operational aspects of the visa procedure and takes account of the results of negotiations on the Visa Code recast proposal. New elements have been added which were advanced in the Commission's September 2017 Communication on the Delivery of the European Agenda on Migration 5 and in its consultations, such as the need for sufficient financial resources to support Member States' visa processing, clear rules on the issuing of multiple entry visas with a long period of validity and the leverage role that visa policy can exert in the EU's readmission policy. The Commission’s proposal for the reform of the Visa Information System legal framework (to be presented in spring 2018) will further enhance the security and efficiency of the visa procedure, in particular by taking account of technological developments and harnessing them to the benefit of Member States' authorities and bona fide applicants, closing information gaps in some areas, enhancing checks on persons and speeding up the quality and outcome of the procedure.
Article 11 Application form
1. Each applicant shall submit a completed and signed application form, as set out in Annex I. Persons included in the applicant’s travel document shall submit a separate application form. Minors shall submit an application form signed by a person exercising permanent or temporary parental authority or legal guardianship. 2. Consulates shall make the application form widely available and easily accessible to applicants free of charge. 3. The form shall be available in the following languages: (a) the official language(s) of the Member State for which a visa is requested; (b) the official language(s) of the host country; (c) the official language(s) of the host country and the official language(s) of the Member State for which a visa is requested; or (d) in case of representation, the official language(s) of the representing Member State. In addition to the language(s) referred to in point (a), the form may be made available in another official language of the institutions of the European Union. 4. If the application form is not available in the official language(s) of the host country, a translation of it into that/those language(s) shall be made available separately to applicants. 5. A translation of the application form into the official language(s) of the host country shall be produced under local Schengen cooperation provided for in Article 48. 6. The consulate shall inform applicants of the language(s) which may be used when filling in the application form.
Amendment rationale: CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL Reasons for and objectives of the proposal The Visa Code is a core element of the common visa policy: it establishes harmonised procedures and conditions for processing visa applications and issuing visas. It entered into force on 5 April 2010, with the overarching objectives of facilitating legitimate travel and tackling irregular immigration, enhancing transparency and legal certainty, strengthening procedural guarantees and reinforcing equal treatment of visa applicants. The Visa Code required the Commission to submit to the European Parliament and the Council an evaluation of its implementation two years after all the provisions of the Regulation had become applicable. It presented its evaluation in a report 1 and accompanying staff working document 2 on 1 April 2014. On the basis of this evaluation, on the same date the Commission adopted a proposal 3 for a recast of the Visa Code with the aim of enhancing travel to the EU through visa policy facilitations (thereby to contributing to tourism, trade, growth and employment in the EU) and to harmonising implementation of the common rules. However, due to divergences in the positions of the European Parliament and the Council, negotiations have not progressed. Meanwhile, greater security and migratory challenges have made it clear that the approach followed in 2014 no longer matches reality. T hese factors prompte d the Commission to announce the withdrawal of its recast proposal in the Commission Work programme for 2018 4 . The formal withdrawal will take place in April 2018. While migration- and security-related objectives have become increasingly important, one should not lose sight of the fact that the vast majority of visa applicants pose no security and/or migratory risk to the EU and are bringing significant benefits to the EU. Therefore, this proposal focuses on streamlining and improving operational aspects of the visa procedure and takes account of the results of negotiations on the Visa Code recast proposal. New elements have been added which were advanced in the Commission's September 2017 Communication on the Delivery of the European Agenda on Migration 5 and in its consultations, such as the need for sufficient financial resources to support Member States' visa processing, clear rules on the issuing of multiple entry visas with a long period of validity and the leverage role that visa policy can exert in the EU's readmission policy. The Commission’s proposal for the reform of the Visa Information System legal framework (to be presented in spring 2018) will further enhance the security and efficiency of the visa procedure, in particular by taking account of technological developments and harnessing them to the benefit of Member States' authorities and bona fide applicants, closing information gaps in some areas, enhancing checks on persons and speeding up the quality and outcome of the procedure.
Revised version (Article 11 Application form):
1. Each applicant shall submit a manually or electronically completed application form, as set out in Annex I. The application form shall be signed. It may be signed manually or, where electronic signature is recognised by the Member State competent for examining and deciding on an application, electronically. rsons included in the applicant’s travel document shall submit a separate application form. Minors shall submit an application form signed by a person exercising permanent or temporary parental authority or legal guardianship. 1a. Where the applicant signs the application form electronically, the electronic signature shall be a qualified electronic signature, within the meaning of point (12) of Article 3 of Regulation (EU) No 910/2014. 1b. The content of the electronic version of the application form, if applicable, shall be as set out in Annex I. 2. Consulates shall make the application form widely available and easily accessible to applicants free of charge. In addition to the language(s) referred to in point (a), the form may be made available in any other official language(s) of the institutions of the Union. 4. If the official language(s) of the host country is/are not integrated into the form, a translation into that/those language(s) shall be made available separately to applicants. 5. A translation of the application form into the official language(s) of the host country shall be produced under local Schengen cooperation provided for in Article 48. 6. The consulate shall inform applicants of the language(s) which may be used when filling in the application form.
Article 12 Travel document
The applicant shall present a valid travel document satisfying the following criteria: (a) its validity shall extend at least three months after the intended date of departure from the territory of the Member States or, in the case of several visits, after the last intended date of departure from the territory of the Member States. However, in a justified case of emergency, this obligation may be waived; (b) it shall contain at least two blank pages; (c) it shall have been issued within the previous 10 years.
Article 13 Biometric identifiers
1. Member States shall collect biometric identifiers of the applicant comprising a photograph of him and his 10 fingerprints in accordance with the safeguards laid down in the Council of Europe’s Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and in the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. 2. At the time of submission of the first application, the applicant shall be required to appear in person. At that time, the following biometric identifiers of the applicant shall be collected: — a photograph, scanned or taken at the time of application, and — his 10 fingerprints taken flat and collected digitally. 3. Where fingerprints collected from the applicant as part of an earlier application were entered in the VIS for the first time less than 59 months before the date of the new application, they shall be copied to the subsequent application. However, where there is reasonable doubt regarding the identity of the applicant, the consulate shall collect fingerprints within the period specified in the first subparagraph. Furthermore, if at the time when the application is lodged, it cannot be immediately confirmed that the fingerprints were collected within the period specified in the first subparagraph, the applicant may request that they be collected. 4. In accordance with Article 9(5) of the VIS Regulation, the photograph attached to each application shall be entered in the VIS. The applicant shall not be required to appear in person for this purpose. The technical requirements for the photograph shall be in accordance with the international standards as set out in the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) document 9303 Part 1, 6th edition. 5. Fingerprints shall be taken in accordance with ICAO standards and Commission Decision 2006/648/EC of 22 September 2006 laying down the technical specifications on the standards for biometric features related to the development of the Visa Information System ( 20 ). 6. The biometric identifiers shall be collected by qualified and duly authorised staff of the authorities competent in accordance with Article 4(1), (2) and (3). Under the supervision of the consulates, the biometric identifiers may also be collected by qualified and duly authorised staff of an honorary consul as referred to in Article 42 or of an external service provider as referred to in Article 43. The Member State(s) concerned shall, where there is any doubt, provide for the possibility of verifying at the consulate fingerprints which have been taken by the external service provider. 7. The following applicants shall be exempt from the requirement to give fingerprints: (a) children under the age of 12; (b) persons for whom fingerprinting is physically impossible. If the fingerprinting of fewer than 10 fingers is possible, the maximum number of fingerprints shall be taken. However, should the impossibility be temporary, the applicant shall be required to give the fingerprints at the following application. The authorities competent in accordance with Article 4(1), (2) and (3) shall be entitled to ask for further clarification of the grounds for the temporary impossibility. Member States shall ensure that appropriate procedures guaranteeing the dignity of the applicant are in place in the event of there being difficulties in enrolling; (c) heads of State or government and members of a national government with accompanying spouses, and the members of their official delegation when they are invited by Member States’ governments or by international organisations for an official purpose; (d) sovereigns and other senior members of a royal family, when they are invited by Member States’ governments or by international organisations for an official purpose. 8. In the cases referred to in paragraph 7, the entry ‘not applicable’ shall be introduced in the VIS in accordance with Article 8(5) of the VIS Regulation.
Amendment rationale: CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL Reasons for and objectives of the proposal The Visa Code is a core element of the common visa policy: it establishes harmonised procedures and conditions for processing visa applications and issuing visas. It entered into force on 5 April 2010, with the overarching objectives of facilitating legitimate travel and tackling irregular immigration, enhancing transparency and legal certainty, strengthening procedural guarantees and reinforcing equal treatment of visa applicants. The Visa Code required the Commission to submit to the European Parliament and the Council an evaluation of its implementation two years after all the provisions of the Regulation had become applicable. It presented its evaluation in a report 1 and accompanying staff working document 2 on 1 April 2014. On the basis of this evaluation, on the same date the Commission adopted a proposal 3 for a recast of the Visa Code with the aim of enhancing travel to the EU through visa policy facilitations (thereby to contributing to tourism, trade, growth and employment in the EU) and to harmonising implementation of the common rules. However, due to divergences in the positions of the European Parliament and the Council, negotiations have not progressed. Meanwhile, greater security and migratory challenges have made it clear that the approach followed in 2014 no longer matches reality. T hese factors prompte d the Commission to announce the withdrawal of its recast proposal in the Commission Work programme for 2018 4 . The formal withdrawal will take place in April 2018. While migration- and security-related objectives have become increasingly important, one should not lose sight of the fact that the vast majority of visa applicants pose no security and/or migratory risk to the EU and are bringing significant benefits to the EU. Therefore, this proposal focuses on streamlining and improving operational aspects of the visa procedure and takes account of the results of negotiations on the Visa Code recast proposal. New elements have been added which were advanced in the Commission's September 2017 Communication on the Delivery of the European Agenda on Migration 5 and in its consultations, such as the need for sufficient financial resources to support Member States' visa processing, clear rules on the issuing of multiple entry visas with a long period of validity and the leverage role that visa policy can exert in the EU's readmission policy. The Commission’s proposal for the reform of the Visa Information System legal framework (to be presented in spring 2018) will further enhance the security and efficiency of the visa procedure, in particular by taking account of technological developments and harnessing them to the benefit of Member States' authorities and bona fide applicants, closing information gaps in some areas, enhancing checks on persons and speeding up the quality and outcome of the procedure.
Revised version (Article 13 Biometric identifiers):
1. Member States shall collect biometric identifiers of the applicant comprising a photograph of him and his 10 fingerprints in accordance with the safeguards laid down in the Council of Europe’s Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and in the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. 2. At the time of submission of the first application, the applicant shall be required to appear in person. At that time, the following biometric identifiers of the applicant shall be collected: — a photograph, scanned or taken at the time of application, and — his 10 fingerprints taken flat and collected digitally. 3. Where fingerprints collected from the applicant as part of an earlier application were entered in the VIS for the first time less than 59 months before the date of the new application, they shall be copied to the subsequent application. However, where there is reasonable doubt regarding the identity of the applicant, the consulate shall collect fingerprints within the period specified in the first subparagraph. Furthermore, if at the time when the application is lodged, it cannot be immediately confirmed that the fingerprints were collected within the period specified in the first subparagraph, the applicant may request that they be collected. 4. In accordance with Article 9(5) of the VIS Regulation, the photograph attached to each application shall be entered in the VIS. The applicant shall not be required to appear in person for this purpose. The technical requirements for the photograph shall be in accordance with the international standards as set out in the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) document 9303 Part 1, 6th edition. 5. Fingerprints shall be taken in accordance with ICAO standards and Commission Decision 2006/648/EC of 22 September 2006 laying down the technical specifications on the standards for biometric features related to the development of the Visa Information System ( 6 ). 8. In the cases referred to in paragraph 7, the entry ‘not applicable’ shall be introduced in the VIS in accordance with Article 8(5) of the VIS Regulation.
Article 14 Supporting documents
1. When applying for a uniform visa, the applicant shall present: (a) documents indicating the purpose of the journey; (b) documents in relation to accommodation, or proof of sufficient means to cover his accommodation; (c) documents indicating that the applicant possesses sufficient means of subsistence both for the duration of the intended stay and for the return to his country of origin or residence, or for the transit to a third country into which he is certain to be admitted, or that he is in a position to acquire such means lawfully, in accordance with Article 5(1)(c) and (3) of the Schengen Borders Code; (d) information enabling an assessment of the applicant’s intention to leave the territory of the Member States before the expiry of the visa applied for. 2. When applying for an airport transit visa, the applicant shall present: (a) documents in relation to the onward journey to the final destination after the intended airport transit; (b) information enabling an assessment of the applicant’s intention not to enter the territory of the Member States. 3. A non-exhaustive list of supporting documents which the consulate may request from the applicant in order to verify the fulfilment of the conditions listed in paragraphs 1 and 2 is set out in Annex II. 4. Member States may require applicants to present a proof of sponsorship and/or private accommodation by completing a form drawn up by each Member State. That form shall indicate in particular: (a) whether its purpose is proof of sponsorship and/or of accommodation; (b) whether the host is an individual, a company or an organisation; (c) the host’s identity and contact details; (d) the invited applicant(s); (e) the address of the accommodation; (f) the length and purpose of the stay; (g) possible family ties with the host. In addition to the Member State’s official language(s), the form shall be drawn up in at least one other official language of the institutions of the European Union. The form shall provide the person signing it with the information required pursuant to Article 37(1) of the VIS Regulation. A specimen of the form shall be notified to the Commission. 5. Within local Schengen cooperation the need to complete and harmonise the lists of supporting documents shall be assessed in each jurisdiction in order to take account of local circumstances. 6. Consulates may waive one or more of the requirements of paragraph 1 in the case of an applicant known to them for his integrity and reliability, in particular the lawful use of previous visas, if there is no doubt that he will fulfil the requirements of Article 5(1) of the Schengen Borders Code at the time of the crossing of the external borders of the Member States.
Amendment rationale: CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL Reasons for and objectives of the proposal The Visa Code is a core element of the common visa policy: it establishes harmonised procedures and conditions for processing visa applications and issuing visas. It entered into force on 5 April 2010, with the overarching objectives of facilitating legitimate travel and tackling irregular immigration, enhancing transparency and legal certainty, strengthening procedural guarantees and reinforcing equal treatment of visa applicants. The Visa Code required the Commission to submit to the European Parliament and the Council an evaluation of its implementation two years after all the provisions of the Regulation had become applicable. It presented its evaluation in a report 1 and accompanying staff working document 2 on 1 April 2014. On the basis of this evaluation, on the same date the Commission adopted a proposal 3 for a recast of the Visa Code with the aim of enhancing travel to the EU through visa policy facilitations (thereby to contributing to tourism, trade, growth and employment in the EU) and to harmonising implementation of the common rules. However, due to divergences in the positions of the European Parliament and the Council, negotiations have not progressed. Meanwhile, greater security and migratory challenges have made it clear that the approach followed in 2014 no longer matches reality. T hese factors prompte d the Commission to announce the withdrawal of its recast proposal in the Commission Work programme for 2018 4 . The formal withdrawal will take place in April 2018. While migration- and security-related objectives have become increasingly important, one should not lose sight of the fact that the vast majority of visa applicants pose no security and/or migratory risk to the EU and are bringing significant benefits to the EU. Therefore, this proposal focuses on streamlining and improving operational aspects of the visa procedure and takes account of the results of negotiations on the Visa Code recast proposal. New elements have been added which were advanced in the Commission's September 2017 Communication on the Delivery of the European Agenda on Migration 5 and in its consultations, such as the need for sufficient financial resources to support Member States' visa processing, clear rules on the issuing of multiple entry visas with a long period of validity and the leverage role that visa policy can exert in the EU's readmission policy. The Commission’s proposal for the reform of the Visa Information System legal framework (to be presented in spring 2018) will further enhance the security and efficiency of the visa procedure, in particular by taking account of technological developments and harnessing them to the benefit of Member States' authorities and bona fide applicants, closing information gaps in some areas, enhancing checks on persons and speeding up the quality and outcome of the procedure.
Revised version (Article 14 Supporting documents):
2. When applying for an airport transit visa, the applicant shall present: (a) documents in relation to the onward journey to the final destination after the intended airport transit; (b) information enabling an assessment of the applicant’s intention not to enter the territory of the Member States. 3. A non-exhaustive list of supporting documents which may be requested from the applicant in order to verify the fulfilment of the conditions listed in paragraphs 1 and 2 is set out in Annex II. In addition to the Member State's official language(s), the form shall be drawn up in at least one other official language of the institutions of the Union. A specimen of the form shall be sent to the Commission. 5. Consulates shall, within local Schengen cooperation, assess the implementation of the conditions laid down in paragraph 1, to take account of local circumstances, and of migratory and security risks. 5a. Where necessary in order to take account of local circumstances as referred to in Article 48, the Commission shall by means of implementing acts adopt a harmonised list of supporting documents to be used in each jurisdiction. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 52(2). 6. The requirements of paragraph 1 of this Article may be waived in the case of an applicant known to the consulate or the central authorities for his integrity and reliability, in particular as regards the lawful use of previous visas, if there is no doubt that he will fulfil the requirements of Article 6(1) of Regulation (EU) 2016/399 of the European Parliament and of the Council ( 7 ) at the time of the crossing of the external borders of the Member States.
Article 15 Travel medical insurance
1. Applicants for a uniform visa for one or two entries shall prove that they are in possession of adequate and valid travel medical insurance to cover any expenses which might arise in connection with repatriation for medical reasons, urgent medical attention and/or emergency hospital treatment or death, during their stay(s) on the territory of the Member States. 2. Applicants for a uniform visa for more than two entries (multiple entries) shall prove that they are in possession of adequate and valid travel medical insurance covering the period of their first intended visit. In addition, such applicants shall sign the statement, set out in the application form, declaring that they are aware of the need to be in possession of travel medical insurance for subsequent stays. 3. The insurance shall be valid throughout the territory of the Member States and cover the entire period of the person’s intended stay or transit. The minimum coverage shall be EUR 30 000. When a visa with limited territorial validity covering the territory of more than one Member State is issued, the insurance cover shall be valid at least in the Member States concerned. 4. Applicants shall, in principle, take out insurance in their country of residence. Where this is not possible, they shall seek to obtain insurance in any other country. When another person takes out insurance in the name of the applicant, the conditions set out in paragraph 3 shall apply. 5. When assessing whether the insurance cover is adequate, consulates shall ascertain whether claims against the insurance company would be recoverable in a Member State. 6. The insurance requirement may be considered to have been met where it is established that an adequate level of insurance may be presumed in the light of the applicant’s professional situation. The exemption from presenting proof of travel medical insurance may concern particular professional groups, such as seafarers, who are already covered by travel medical insurance as a result of their professional activities. 7. Holders of diplomatic passports shall be exempt from the requirement to hold travel medical insurance.
Amendment rationale: CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL Reasons for and objectives of the proposal The Visa Code is a core element of the common visa policy: it establishes harmonised procedures and conditions for processing visa applications and issuing visas. It entered into force on 5 April 2010, with the overarching objectives of facilitating legitimate travel and tackling irregular immigration, enhancing transparency and legal certainty, strengthening procedural guarantees and reinforcing equal treatment of visa applicants. The Visa Code required the Commission to submit to the European Parliament and the Council an evaluation of its implementation two years after all the provisions of the Regulation had become applicable. It presented its evaluation in a report 1 and accompanying staff working document 2 on 1 April 2014. On the basis of this evaluation, on the same date the Commission adopted a proposal 3 for a recast of the Visa Code with the aim of enhancing travel to the EU through visa policy facilitations (thereby to contributing to tourism, trade, growth and employment in the EU) and to harmonising implementation of the common rules. However, due to divergences in the positions of the European Parliament and the Council, negotiations have not progressed. Meanwhile, greater security and migratory challenges have made it clear that the approach followed in 2014 no longer matches reality. T hese factors prompte d the Commission to announce the withdrawal of its recast proposal in the Commission Work programme for 2018 4 . The formal withdrawal will take place in April 2018. While migration- and security-related objectives have become increasingly important, one should not lose sight of the fact that the vast majority of visa applicants pose no security and/or migratory risk to the EU and are bringing significant benefits to the EU. Therefore, this proposal focuses on streamlining and improving operational aspects of the visa procedure and takes account of the results of negotiations on the Visa Code recast proposal. New elements have been added which were advanced in the Commission's September 2017 Communication on the Delivery of the European Agenda on Migration 5 and in its consultations, such as the need for sufficient financial resources to support Member States' visa processing, clear rules on the issuing of multiple entry visas with a long period of validity and the leverage role that visa policy can exert in the EU's readmission policy. The Commission’s proposal for the reform of the Visa Information System legal framework (to be presented in spring 2018) will further enhance the security and efficiency of the visa procedure, in particular by taking account of technological developments and harnessing them to the benefit of Member States' authorities and bona fide applicants, closing information gaps in some areas, enhancing checks on persons and speeding up the quality and outcome of the procedure.
Revised version (Article 15 Travel medical insurance):
1. Applicants for a uniform visa for one or two entries shall prove that they are in possession of adequate and valid travel medical insurance to cover any expenses which might arise in connection with repatriation for medical reasons, urgent medical attention and/or emergency hospital treatment or death, during their stay(s) on the territory of the Member States. 2. Applicants for a multiple-entry visa shall prove that they are in possession of adequate and valid travel medical insurance covering the period of their first intended visit. In addition, such applicants shall sign the statement, set out in the application form, declaring that they are aware of the need to be in possession of travel medical insurance for subsequent stays. 3. The insurance shall be valid throughout the territory of the Member States and cover the entire period of the person’s intended stay or transit. The minimum coverage shall be EUR 30 000 . When a visa with limited territorial validity covering the territory of more than one Member State is issued, the insurance cover shall be valid at least in the Member States concerned. 4. Applicants shall, in principle, take out insurance in their country of residence. Where this is not possible, they shall seek to obtain insurance in any other country. When another person takes out insurance in the name of the applicant, the conditions set out in paragraph 3 shall apply. 5. When assessing whether the insurance cover is adequate, consulates shall ascertain whether claims against the insurance company would be recoverable in a Member State. 6. The insurance requirement may be considered to have been met where it is established that an adequate level of insurance may be presumed in the light of the applicant’s professional situation. The exemption from presenting proof of travel medical insurance may concern particular professional groups, such as seafarers, who are already covered by travel medical insurance as a result of their professional activities. 7. Holders of diplomatic passports shall be exempt from the requirement to hold travel medical insurance.
Article 16 Visa fee
1. Applicants shall pay a visa fee of EUR 60. 2. Children from the age of six years and below the age of 12 years shall pay a visa fee of EUR 35. 3. The visa fee shall be revised regularly in order to reflect the administrative costs. 4. The visa fee shall be waived for applicants belonging to one of the following categories: (a) children under six years; (b) school pupils, students, postgraduate students and accompanying teachers who undertake stays for the purpose of study or educational training; (c) researchers from third countries travelling for the purpose of carrying out scientific research as defined in Recommendation No 2005/761/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 September 2005 to facilitate the issue by the Member States of uniform short-stay visas for researchers from third countries travelling within the Community for the purpose of carrying out scientific research ( 21 ); (d) representatives of non-profit organisations aged 25 years or less participating in seminars, conferences, sports, cultural or educational events organised by non-profit organisations. 5. The visa fee may be waived for: (a) children from the age of six years and below the age of 12 years; (b) holders of diplomatic and service passports; (c) participants aged 25 years or less in seminars, conferences, sports, cultural or educational events, organised by non-profit organisations. Within local Schengen cooperation, Members States shall aim to harmonise the application of these exemptions. 6. In individual cases, the amount of the visa fee to be charged may be waived or reduced when to do so serves to promote cultural or sporting interests as well as interests in the field of foreign policy, development policy and other areas of vital public interest or for humanitarian reasons. 7. The visa fee shall be charged in euro, in the national currency of the third country or in the currency usually used in the third country where the application is lodged, and shall not be refundable except in the cases referred to in Articles 18(2) and 19(3). When charged in a currency other than euro, the amount of the visa fee charged in that currency shall be determined and regularly reviewed in application of the euro foreign exchange reference rate set by the European Central Bank. The amount charged may be rounded up and consulates shall ensure under local Schengen cooperation that they charge similar fees. 8. The applicant shall be given a receipt for the visa fee paid.
Amendment rationale: CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL Reasons for and objectives of the proposal The Visa Code is a core element of the common visa policy: it establishes harmonised procedures and conditions for processing visa applications and issuing visas. It entered into force on 5 April 2010, with the overarching objectives of facilitating legitimate travel and tackling irregular immigration, enhancing transparency and legal certainty, strengthening procedural guarantees and reinforcing equal treatment of visa applicants. The Visa Code required the Commission to submit to the European Parliament and the Council an evaluation of its implementation two years after all the provisions of the Regulation had become applicable. It presented its evaluation in a report 1 and accompanying staff working document 2 on 1 April 2014. On the basis of this evaluation, on the same date the Commission adopted a proposal 3 for a recast of the Visa Code with the aim of enhancing travel to the EU through visa policy facilitations (thereby to contributing to tourism, trade, growth and employment in the EU) and to harmonising implementation of the common rules. However, due to divergences in the positions of the European Parliament and the Council, negotiations have not progressed. Meanwhile, greater security and migratory challenges have made it clear that the approach followed in 2014 no longer matches reality. T hese factors prompte d the Commission to announce the withdrawal of its recast proposal in the Commission Work programme for 2018 4 . The formal withdrawal will take place in April 2018. While migration- and security-related objectives have become increasingly important, one should not lose sight of the fact that the vast majority of visa applicants pose no security and/or migratory risk to the EU and are bringing significant benefits to the EU. Therefore, this proposal focuses on streamlining and improving operational aspects of the visa procedure and takes account of the results of negotiations on the Visa Code recast proposal. New elements have been added which were advanced in the Commission's September 2017 Communication on the Delivery of the European Agenda on Migration 5 and in its consultations, such as the need for sufficient financial resources to support Member States' visa processing, clear rules on the issuing of multiple entry visas with a long period of validity and the leverage role that visa policy can exert in the EU's readmission policy. The Commission’s proposal for the reform of the Visa Information System legal framework (to be presented in spring 2018) will further enhance the security and efficiency of the visa procedure, in particular by taking account of technological developments and harnessing them to the benefit of Member States' authorities and bona fide applicants, closing information gaps in some areas, enhancing checks on persons and speeding up the quality and outcome of the procedure.
Revised version (Article 16 Visa fee):
1. Applicants shall pay a visa fee of EUR 80. 2. Children from the age of six years and below the age of 12 years shall pay a visa fee of EUR 40. 2a. A visa fee of EUR 120 or EUR 160 shall apply if an implementing decision is adopted by the Council under point (b) of Article 25a(5). This provision shall not apply to children below the age of 12 years. 6. In individual cases, the amount of the visa fee to be charged may be waived or reduced when to do so serves to promote cultural or sporting interests, interests in the field of foreign policy, development policy and other areas of vital public interest, or for humanitarian reasons or because of international obligations. 7. The visa fee shall be charged in euro, in the national currency of the third country or in the currency usually used in the third country where the application is lodged, and shall not be refundable except in the cases referred to in Articles 18(2) and 19(3). When charged in a currency other than the euro, the amount of the visa fee charged in that currency shall be determined and regularly reviewed in application of the euro foreign exchange reference rate set by the European Central Bank. The amount charged may be rounded up and it shall be ensured under local Schengen cooperation that similar fees are charged. 8. The applicant shall be given a receipt for the visa fee paid. 9. The Commission shall assess the need to revise the amount of the visa fees set out in paragraphs 1, 2 and 2a of this Article every three years, taking into account objective criteria, such as the general Union-wide inflation rate as published by Eurostat, and the weighted average of the salaries of Member States' civil servants. On the basis of those assessments, the Commission shall adopt, where appropriate, delegated acts in accordance with Article 51a concerning the amendment of this Regulation as regards the amount of the visa fees.
Article 17 Service fee
1. An additional service fee may be charged by an external service provider referred to in Article 43. The service fee shall be proportionate to the costs incurred by the external service provider while performing one or more of the tasks referred to in Article 43(6). 2. The service fee shall be specified in the legal instrument referred to in Article 43(2). 3. Within the framework of local Schengen cooperation, Member States shall ensure that the service fee charged to an applicant duly reflects the services offered by the external service provider and is adapted to local circumstances. Furthermore, they shall aim to harmonise the service fee applied. 4. The service fee shall not exceed half of the amount of the visa fee set out in Article 16(1), irrespective of the possible reductions in or exemptions from the visa fee as provided for in Article 16(2), (4), (5) and (6). 5. The Member State(s) concerned shall maintain the possibility for all applicants to lodge their applications directly at its/their consulates.
Amendment rationale: CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL Reasons for and objectives of the proposal The Visa Code is a core element of the common visa policy: it establishes harmonised procedures and conditions for processing visa applications and issuing visas. It entered into force on 5 April 2010, with the overarching objectives of facilitating legitimate travel and tackling irregular immigration, enhancing transparency and legal certainty, strengthening procedural guarantees and reinforcing equal treatment of visa applicants. The Visa Code required the Commission to submit to the European Parliament and the Council an evaluation of its implementation two years after all the provisions of the Regulation had become applicable. It presented its evaluation in a report 1 and accompanying staff working document 2 on 1 April 2014. On the basis of this evaluation, on the same date the Commission adopted a proposal 3 for a recast of the Visa Code with the aim of enhancing travel to the EU through visa policy facilitations (thereby to contributing to tourism, trade, growth and employment in the EU) and to harmonising implementation of the common rules. However, due to divergences in the positions of the European Parliament and the Council, negotiations have not progressed. Meanwhile, greater security and migratory challenges have made it clear that the approach followed in 2014 no longer matches reality. T hese factors prompte d the Commission to announce the withdrawal of its recast proposal in the Commission Work programme for 2018 4 . The formal withdrawal will take place in April 2018. While migration- and security-related objectives have become increasingly important, one should not lose sight of the fact that the vast majority of visa applicants pose no security and/or migratory risk to the EU and are bringing significant benefits to the EU. Therefore, this proposal focuses on streamlining and improving operational aspects of the visa procedure and takes account of the results of negotiations on the Visa Code recast proposal. New elements have been added which were advanced in the Commission's September 2017 Communication on the Delivery of the European Agenda on Migration 5 and in its consultations, such as the need for sufficient financial resources to support Member States' visa processing, clear rules on the issuing of multiple entry visas with a long period of validity and the leverage role that visa policy can exert in the EU's readmission policy. The Commission’s proposal for the reform of the Visa Information System legal framework (to be presented in spring 2018) will further enhance the security and efficiency of the visa procedure, in particular by taking account of technological developments and harnessing them to the benefit of Member States' authorities and bona fide applicants, closing information gaps in some areas, enhancing checks on persons and speeding up the quality and outcome of the procedure.
Revised version (Article 17 Service fee):
1. A service fee may be charged by an external service provider referred to in Article 43. e service fee shall be proportionate to the costs incurred by the external service provider while performing one or more of the tasks referred to in Article 43(6). 2. The service fee shall be specified in the legal instrument referred to in Article 43(2). 4. The service fee shall not exceed half of the amount of the visa fee set out in Article 16(1), irrespective of the possible reductions in or exemptions from the visa fee as provided for in Article 16(2), (4), (5) and (6). 4a. By way of derogation from paragraph 4, the service fee shall, in principle, not exceed 80 EUR in third countries where the competent Member State has no consulate for the purpose of collecting applications and is not represented by another Member State. 4b. In exceptional circumstances where the amount referred to in paragraph 4a is not sufficient to provide a full service, a higher service fee of up to a maximum of 120 EUR may be charged. In such a case, the Member State concerned shall notify the Commission of its intention to allow for a higher service fee to be charged, at the latest three months before the start of its implementation. The notification shall specify the grounds for the determination of the level of the service fee, in particular the detailed costs leading to the determination of a higher amount. 5. The Member State concerned may maintain the possibility for all applicants to lodge their applications directly at its consulates or at the consulate of a Member State with which it has a representation arrangement, in accordance with Article 8.
Article 18 Verification of consular competence
1. When an application has been lodged, the consulate shall verify whether it is competent to examine and decide on it in accordance with the provisions of Articles 5 and 6. 2. If the consulate is not competent, it shall, without delay, return the application form and any documents submitted by the applicant, reimburse the visa fee, and indicate which consulate is competent.
Article 19 Admissibility
1. The competent consulate shall verify whether: — the application has been lodged within the period referred to in Article 9(1), — the application contains the items referred to in Article 10(3)(a) to (c), — the biometric data of the applicant have been collected, and — the visa fee has been collected. 2. Where the competent consulate finds that the conditions referred to in paragraph 1 have been fulfilled, the application shall be admissible and the consulate shall: — follow the procedures described in Article 8 of the VIS Regulation, and — further examine the application. Data shall be entered in the VIS only by duly authorised consular staff in accordance with Articles 6(1), 7, 9(5) and 9(6) of the VIS Regulation. 3. Where the competent consulate finds that the conditions referred to in paragraph 1 have not been fulfilled, the application shall be inadmissible and the consulate shall without delay: — return the application form and any documents submitted by the applicant, — destroy the collected biometric data, — reimburse the visa fee, and — not examine the application. 4. By way of derogation, an application that does not meet the requirements set out in paragraph 1 may be considered admissible on humanitarian grounds or for reasons of national interest.
Amendment rationale: CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL Reasons for and objectives of the proposal The Visa Code is a core element of the common visa policy: it establishes harmonised procedures and conditions for processing visa applications and issuing visas. It entered into force on 5 April 2010, with the overarching objectives of facilitating legitimate travel and tackling irregular immigration, enhancing transparency and legal certainty, strengthening procedural guarantees and reinforcing equal treatment of visa applicants. The Visa Code required the Commission to submit to the European Parliament and the Council an evaluation of its implementation two years after all the provisions of the Regulation had become applicable. It presented its evaluation in a report 1 and accompanying staff working document 2 on 1 April 2014. On the basis of this evaluation, on the same date the Commission adopted a proposal 3 for a recast of the Visa Code with the aim of enhancing travel to the EU through visa policy facilitations (thereby to contributing to tourism, trade, growth and employment in the EU) and to harmonising implementation of the common rules. However, due to divergences in the positions of the European Parliament and the Council, negotiations have not progressed. Meanwhile, greater security and migratory challenges have made it clear that the approach followed in 2014 no longer matches reality. T hese factors prompte d the Commission to announce the withdrawal of its recast proposal in the Commission Work programme for 2018 4 . The formal withdrawal will take place in April 2018. While migration- and security-related objectives have become increasingly important, one should not lose sight of the fact that the vast majority of visa applicants pose no security and/or migratory risk to the EU and are bringing significant benefits to the EU. Therefore, this proposal focuses on streamlining and improving operational aspects of the visa procedure and takes account of the results of negotiations on the Visa Code recast proposal. New elements have been added which were advanced in the Commission's September 2017 Communication on the Delivery of the European Agenda on Migration 5 and in its consultations, such as the need for sufficient financial resources to support Member States' visa processing, clear rules on the issuing of multiple entry visas with a long period of validity and the leverage role that visa policy can exert in the EU's readmission policy. The Commission’s proposal for the reform of the Visa Information System legal framework (to be presented in spring 2018) will further enhance the security and efficiency of the visa procedure, in particular by taking account of technological developments and harnessing them to the benefit of Member States' authorities and bona fide applicants, closing information gaps in some areas, enhancing checks on persons and speeding up the quality and outcome of the procedure.
Revised version (Article 19 Admissibility):
2. Where the competent consulate or the central authorities of the competent Member State find that the conditions referred to in paragraph 1 have been fulfilled, the application shall be admissible and the consulate or the central authorities shall: — follow the procedures described in Article 8 of the VIS Regulation, and — further examine the application. 3. Where the competent consulate or the central authorities of the competent Member State find that the conditions referred to in paragraph 1 have not been fulfilled, the application shall be inadmissible and the consulate or central authorities shall without delay: — return the application form and any documents submitted by the applicant, — destroy the collected biometric data, — reimburse the visa fee, and — not examine the application. 4. By way of derogation from paragraph 3, an application that does not meet the requirements set out in paragraph 1 may be considered admissible on humanitarian grounds, for reasons of national interest or because of international obligations.
Article 20 Stamp indicating that an application is admissible
1. When an application is admissible, the competent consulate shall stamp the applicant’s travel document. The stamp shall be as set out in the model in Annex III and shall be affixed in accordance with the provisions of that Annex. 2. Diplomatic, service/official and special passports shall not be stamped. 3. The provisions of this Article shall apply to the consulates of the Member States until the date when the VIS becomes fully operational in all regions, in accordance with Article 48 of the VIS Regulation.
Article 21 Verification of entry conditions and risk assessment
1. In the examination of an application for a uniform visa, it shall be ascertained whether the applicant fulfils the entry conditions set out in Article 5(1)(a), (c), (d) and (e) of the Schengen Borders Code, and particular consideration shall be given to assessing whether the applicant presents a risk of illegal immigration or a risk to the security of the Member States and whether the applicant intends to leave the territory of the Member States before the expiry of the visa applied for. 2. In respect of each application, the VIS shall be consulted in accordance with Articles 8(2) and 15 of the VIS Regulation. Member States shall ensure that full use is made of all search criteria pursuant to Article 15 of the VIS Regulation in order to avoid false rejections and identifications. 3. While checking whether the applicant fulfils the entry conditions, the consulate shall verify: (a) that the travel document presented is not false, counterfeit or forged; (b) the applicant’s justification for the purpose and conditions of the intended stay, and that he has sufficient means of subsistence, both for the duration of the intended stay and for the return to his country of origin or residence, or for the transit to a third country into which he is certain to be admitted, or is in a position to acquire such means lawfully; (c) whether the applicant is a person for whom an alert has been issued in the Schengen Information System (SIS) for the purpose of refusing entry; (d) that the applicant is not considered to be a threat to public policy, internal security or public health as defined in Article 2(19) of the Schengen Borders Code or to the international relations of any of the Member States, in particular where no alert has been issued in Member States’ national databases for the purpose of refusing entry on the same grounds; (e) that the applicant is in possession of adequate and valid travel medical insurance, where applicable. 4. The consulate shall, where applicable, verify the length of previous and intended stays in order to verify that the applicant has not exceeded the maximum duration of authorised stay in the territory of the Member States, irrespective of possible stays authorised under a national long-stay visa or a residence permit issued by another Member State. 5. The means of subsistence for the intended stay shall be assessed in accordance with the duration and the purpose of the stay and by reference to average prices in the Member State(s) concerned for board and lodging in budget accommodation, multiplied by the number of days stayed, on the basis of the reference amounts set by the Member States in accordance with Article 34(1)(c) of the Schengen Borders Code. Proof of sponsorship and/or private accommodation may also constitute evidence of sufficient means of subsistence. 6. In the examination of an application for an airport transit visa, the consulate shall in particular verify: (b) the points of departure and destination of the third-country national concerned and the coherence of the intended itinerary and airport transit; (c) proof of the onward journey to the final destination. 7. The examination of an application shall be based notably on the authenticity and reliability of the documents submitted and on the veracity and reliability of the statements made by the applicant. 8. During the examination of an application, consulates may in justified cases call the applicant for an interview and request additional documents. 9. A previous visa refusal shall not lead to an automatic refusal of a new application. A new application shall be assessed on the basis of all available information.
Amendment rationale: CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL Reasons for and objectives of the proposal The Visa Code is a core element of the common visa policy: it establishes harmonised procedures and conditions for processing visa applications and issuing visas. It entered into force on 5 April 2010, with the overarching objectives of facilitating legitimate travel and tackling irregular immigration, enhancing transparency and legal certainty, strengthening procedural guarantees and reinforcing equal treatment of visa applicants. The Visa Code required the Commission to submit to the European Parliament and the Council an evaluation of its implementation two years after all the provisions of the Regulation had become applicable. It presented its evaluation in a report 1 and accompanying staff working document 2 on 1 April 2014. On the basis of this evaluation, on the same date the Commission adopted a proposal 3 for a recast of the Visa Code with the aim of enhancing travel to the EU through visa policy facilitations (thereby to contributing to tourism, trade, growth and employment in the EU) and to harmonising implementation of the common rules. However, due to divergences in the positions of the European Parliament and the Council, negotiations have not progressed. Meanwhile, greater security and migratory challenges have made it clear that the approach followed in 2014 no longer matches reality. T hese factors prompte d the Commission to announce the withdrawal of its recast proposal in the Commission Work programme for 2018 4 . The formal withdrawal will take place in April 2018. While migration- and security-related objectives have become increasingly important, one should not lose sight of the fact that the vast majority of visa applicants pose no security and/or migratory risk to the EU and are bringing significant benefits to the EU. Therefore, this proposal focuses on streamlining and improving operational aspects of the visa procedure and takes account of the results of negotiations on the Visa Code recast proposal. New elements have been added which were advanced in the Commission's September 2017 Communication on the Delivery of the European Agenda on Migration 5 and in its consultations, such as the need for sufficient financial resources to support Member States' visa processing, clear rules on the issuing of multiple entry visas with a long period of validity and the leverage role that visa policy can exert in the EU's readmission policy. The Commission’s proposal for the reform of the Visa Information System legal framework (to be presented in spring 2018) will further enhance the security and efficiency of the visa procedure, in particular by taking account of technological developments and harnessing them to the benefit of Member States' authorities and bona fide applicants, closing information gaps in some areas, enhancing checks on persons and speeding up the quality and outcome of the procedure.
Revised version (Article 21 Verification of entry conditions and risk assessment):
2. In respect of each application, the VIS shall be consulted in accordance with Articles 8(2) and 15 of the VIS Regulation. Member States shall ensure that full use is made of all search criteria pursuant to Article 15 of the VIS Regulation in order to avoid false rejections and identifications. 4. The consulate or the central authorities shall, where applicable, verify the length of previous and intended stays in order to verify that the applicant has not exceeded the maximum duration of authorised stay in the territory of the Member States, irrespective of possible stays authorised under a national long-stay visa or a residence permit. 7. The examination of an application shall be based notably on the authenticity and reliability of the documents submitted and on the veracity and reliability of the statements made by the applicant. 8. During the examination of an application, consulates or the central authorities may in justified cases carry out an interview with the applicant and request additional documents. 9. A previous visa refusal shall not lead to an automatic refusal of a new application. A new application shall be assessed on the basis of all available information.
Article 22 Prior consultation of central authorities of other Member States
1. A Member State may require the central authorities of other Member States to consult its central authorities during the examination of applications lodged by nationals of specific third countries or specific categories of such nationals. Such consultation shall not apply to applications for airport transit visas. 2. The central authorities consulted shall reply definitively within seven calendar days after being consulted. The absence of a reply within this deadline shall mean that they have no grounds for objecting to the issuing of the visa. 3. Member States shall notify the Commission of the introduction or withdrawal of the requirement of prior consultation before it becomes applicable. This information shall also be given within local Schengen cooperation in the jurisdiction concerned. 4. The Commission shall inform Member States of such notifications. 5. From the date of the replacement of the Schengen Consultation Network, as referred to in Article 46 of the VIS Regulation, prior consultation shall be carried out in accordance with Article 16(2) of that Regulation.
Amendment rationale: CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL Reasons for and objectives of the proposal The Visa Code is a core element of the common visa policy: it establishes harmonised procedures and conditions for processing visa applications and issuing visas. It entered into force on 5 April 2010, with the overarching objectives of facilitating legitimate travel and tackling irregular immigration, enhancing transparency and legal certainty, strengthening procedural guarantees and reinforcing equal treatment of visa applicants. The Visa Code required the Commission to submit to the European Parliament and the Council an evaluation of its implementation two years after all the provisions of the Regulation had become applicable. It presented its evaluation in a report 1 and accompanying staff working document 2 on 1 April 2014. On the basis of this evaluation, on the same date the Commission adopted a proposal 3 for a recast of the Visa Code with the aim of enhancing travel to the EU through visa policy facilitations (thereby to contributing to tourism, trade, growth and employment in the EU) and to harmonising implementation of the common rules. However, due to divergences in the positions of the European Parliament and the Council, negotiations have not progressed. Meanwhile, greater security and migratory challenges have made it clear that the approach followed in 2014 no longer matches reality. T hese factors prompte d the Commission to announce the withdrawal of its recast proposal in the Commission Work programme for 2018 4 . The formal withdrawal will take place in April 2018. While migration- and security-related objectives have become increasingly important, one should not lose sight of the fact that the vast majority of visa applicants pose no security and/or migratory risk to the EU and are bringing significant benefits to the EU. Therefore, this proposal focuses on streamlining and improving operational aspects of the visa procedure and takes account of the results of negotiations on the Visa Code recast proposal. New elements have been added which were advanced in the Commission's September 2017 Communication on the Delivery of the European Agenda on Migration 5 and in its consultations, such as the need for sufficient financial resources to support Member States' visa processing, clear rules on the issuing of multiple entry visas with a long period of validity and the leverage role that visa policy can exert in the EU's readmission policy. The Commission’s proposal for the reform of the Visa Information System legal framework (to be presented in spring 2018) will further enhance the security and efficiency of the visa procedure, in particular by taking account of technological developments and harnessing them to the benefit of Member States' authorities and bona fide applicants, closing information gaps in some areas, enhancing checks on persons and speeding up the quality and outcome of the procedure.
Revised version (Article 22 Prior consultation of central authorities of other Member States):
1. On the grounds of a threat to public policy, internal security, international relations or public health, a Member State may require the central authorities of other Member States to consult its central authorities during the examination of applications lodged by nationals of specific third countries or specific categories of such nationals. Such consultation shall not apply to applications for airport transit visas. 2. The central authorities consulted shall reply definitively as soon as possible, but not later than seven calendar days after being consulted. The absence of a reply within that deadline shall mean that they have no grounds for objecting to the issuing of the visa. 3. Member States shall notify the Commission of the introduction or withdrawal of the requirement for prior consultation, as a rule, at the latest 25 calendar days before it becomes applicable. That information shall also be given under local Schengen cooperation in the jurisdiction concerned. 4. The Commission shall inform Member States of such notifications.
Article 23 Decision on the application
1. Applications shall be decided on within 15 calendar days of the date of the lodging of an application which is admissible in accordance with Article 19. 2. That period may be extended up to a maximum of 30 calendar days in individual cases, notably when further scrutiny of the application is needed or in cases of representation where the authorities of the represented Member State are consulted. 3. Exceptionally, when additional documentation is needed in specific cases, the period may be extended up to a maximum of 60 calendar days. 4. Unless the application has been withdrawn, a decision shall be taken to: (a) issue a uniform visa in accordance with Article 24; (b) issue a visa with limited territorial validity in accordance with Article 25; (c) refuse a visa in accordance with Article 32; or (d) discontinue the examination of the application and transfer it to the relevant authorities of the represented Member State in accordance with Article 8(2). The fact that fingerprinting is physically impossible, in accordance with Article 13(7)(b), shall not influence the issuing or refusal of a visa.
Amendment rationale: CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL Reasons for and objectives of the proposal The Visa Code is a core element of the common visa policy: it establishes harmonised procedures and conditions for processing visa applications and issuing visas. It entered into force on 5 April 2010, with the overarching objectives of facilitating legitimate travel and tackling irregular immigration, enhancing transparency and legal certainty, strengthening procedural guarantees and reinforcing equal treatment of visa applicants. The Visa Code required the Commission to submit to the European Parliament and the Council an evaluation of its implementation two years after all the provisions of the Regulation had become applicable. It presented its evaluation in a report 1 and accompanying staff working document 2 on 1 April 2014. On the basis of this evaluation, on the same date the Commission adopted a proposal 3 for a recast of the Visa Code with the aim of enhancing travel to the EU through visa policy facilitations (thereby to contributing to tourism, trade, growth and employment in the EU) and to harmonising implementation of the common rules. However, due to divergences in the positions of the European Parliament and the Council, negotiations have not progressed. Meanwhile, greater security and migratory challenges have made it clear that the approach followed in 2014 no longer matches reality. T hese factors prompte d the Commission to announce the withdrawal of its recast proposal in the Commission Work programme for 2018 4 . The formal withdrawal will take place in April 2018. While migration- and security-related objectives have become increasingly important, one should not lose sight of the fact that the vast majority of visa applicants pose no security and/or migratory risk to the EU and are bringing significant benefits to the EU. Therefore, this proposal focuses on streamlining and improving operational aspects of the visa procedure and takes account of the results of negotiations on the Visa Code recast proposal. New elements have been added which were advanced in the Commission's September 2017 Communication on the Delivery of the European Agenda on Migration 5 and in its consultations, such as the need for sufficient financial resources to support Member States' visa processing, clear rules on the issuing of multiple entry visas with a long period of validity and the leverage role that visa policy can exert in the EU's readmission policy. The Commission’s proposal for the reform of the Visa Information System legal framework (to be presented in spring 2018) will further enhance the security and efficiency of the visa procedure, in particular by taking account of technological developments and harnessing them to the benefit of Member States' authorities and bona fide applicants, closing information gaps in some areas, enhancing checks on persons and speeding up the quality and outcome of the procedure.
Revised version (Article 23 Decision on the application):
1. Applications shall be decided on within 15 calendar days of the date of the lodging of an application which is admissible in accordance with Article 19. 2. That period may be extended up to a maximum of 45 calendar days in individual cases, notably when further scrutiny of the application is needed. 2a. Applications shall be decided on without delay in justified individual cases of urgency. The fact that fingerprinting is physically impossible, in accordance with Article 13(7)(b), shall not influence the issuing or refusal of a visa.
Article 24 Issuing of a uniform visa
1. The period of validity of a visa and the length of the authorised stay shall be based on the examination conducted in accordance with Article 21. A visa may be issued for one, two or multiple entries. The period of validity shall not exceed five years. In the case of transit, the length of the authorised stay shall correspond to the time necessary for the purpose of the transit. Without prejudice to Article 12(a), the period of validity of the visa shall include an additional ‘period of grace’ of 15 days. Member States may decide not to grant such a period of grace for reasons of public policy or because of the international relations of any of the Member States. 2. Without prejudice to Article 12(a), multiple-entry visas shall be issued with a period of validity between six months and five years, where the following conditions are met: (a) the applicant proves the need or justifies the intention to travel frequently and/or regularly, in particular due to his occupational or family status, such as business persons, civil servants engaged in regular official contacts with Member States and EU institutions, representatives of civil society organisations travelling for the purpose of educational training, seminars and conferences, family members of citizens of the Union, family members of third-country nationals legally residing in Member States and seafarers; and (b) the applicant proves his integrity and reliability, in particular the lawful use of previous uniform visas or visas with limited territorial validity, his economic situation in the country of origin and his genuine intention to leave the territory of the Member States before the expiry of the visa applied for. 3. The data set out in Article 10(1) of the VIS Regulation shall be entered into the VIS when a decision on issuing such a visa has been taken.
Amendment rationale: CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL Reasons for and objectives of the proposal The Visa Code is a core element of the common visa policy: it establishes harmonised procedures and conditions for processing visa applications and issuing visas. It entered into force on 5 April 2010, with the overarching objectives of facilitating legitimate travel and tackling irregular immigration, enhancing transparency and legal certainty, strengthening procedural guarantees and reinforcing equal treatment of visa applicants. The Visa Code required the Commission to submit to the European Parliament and the Council an evaluation of its implementation two years after all the provisions of the Regulation had become applicable. It presented its evaluation in a report 1 and accompanying staff working document 2 on 1 April 2014. On the basis of this evaluation, on the same date the Commission adopted a proposal 3 for a recast of the Visa Code with the aim of enhancing travel to the EU through visa policy facilitations (thereby to contributing to tourism, trade, growth and employment in the EU) and to harmonising implementation of the common rules. However, due to divergences in the positions of the European Parliament and the Council, negotiations have not progressed. Meanwhile, greater security and migratory challenges have made it clear that the approach followed in 2014 no longer matches reality. T hese factors prompte d the Commission to announce the withdrawal of its recast proposal in the Commission Work programme for 2018 4 . The formal withdrawal will take place in April 2018. While migration- and security-related objectives have become increasingly important, one should not lose sight of the fact that the vast majority of visa applicants pose no security and/or migratory risk to the EU and are bringing significant benefits to the EU. Therefore, this proposal focuses on streamlining and improving operational aspects of the visa procedure and takes account of the results of negotiations on the Visa Code recast proposal. New elements have been added which were advanced in the Commission's September 2017 Communication on the Delivery of the European Agenda on Migration 5 and in its consultations, such as the need for sufficient financial resources to support Member States' visa processing, clear rules on the issuing of multiple entry visas with a long period of validity and the leverage role that visa policy can exert in the EU's readmission policy. The Commission’s proposal for the reform of the Visa Information System legal framework (to be presented in spring 2018) will further enhance the security and efficiency of the visa procedure, in particular by taking account of technological developments and harnessing them to the benefit of Member States' authorities and bona fide applicants, closing information gaps in some areas, enhancing checks on persons and speeding up the quality and outcome of the procedure.
Revised version (Article 24 Issuing of a uniform visa):
1. The period of validity of a visa and the length of the authorised stay shall be based on the examination conducted in accordance with Article 21. A visa may be issued for one, two or multiple entries. The period of validity shall not exceed five years. Without prejudice to point (a) of Article 12, the period of validity of a visa for one entry shall include a ‘period of grace’ of 15 calendar days. Member States may decide not to grant such a period of grace for reasons of public policy or because of the international relations of any of the Member States. 2. Airport transit visas and visas with limited territorial validity issued in accordance with Article 25(1) shall not be taken into account for the issuing of multiple-entry visas. 2a. By way of derogation from paragraph 2, the validity period of the visa issued may be shortened in individual cases where there is reasonable doubt that the entry conditions will be met for the entire period. 2b. By way of derogation from paragraph 2, consulates shall, within local Schengen cooperation, assess whether the rules on the issuing of the multiple-entry visas set out in paragraph 2 need to be adapted to take account of local circumstances, and of migratory and security risks, in view of the adoption of more favourable or more restrictive rules in accordance with paragraph 2d. 2c. Without prejudice to paragraph 2, a multiple-entry visa valid for up to five years may be issued to applicants who prove the need or justify their intention to travel frequently or regularly, provided that they prove their integrity and reliability, in particular the lawful use of previous visas, their economic situation in the country of origin and their genuine intention to leave the territory of the Member States before the expiry of the visa for which they have applied. 2d. Where necessary, on the basis of the assessment referred to in paragraph 2b of this Article, the Commission shall, by means of implementing acts, adopt the rules regarding the conditions for the issuing of multiple-entry visas laid down in paragraph 2 of this Article, to be applied in each jurisdiction in order to take account of local circumstances, of the migratory and security risks, and of the Union's overall relations with the third country in question. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 52(2). 3. The data set out in Article 10(1) of the VIS Regulation shall be entered into the VIS when a decision on issuing such a visa has been taken.
Article 25 Issuing of a visa with limited territorial validity
1. A visa with limited territorial validity shall be issued exceptionally, in the following cases: (a) when the Member State concerned considers it necessary on humanitarian grounds, for reasons of national interest or because of international obligations, (i) to derogate from the principle that the entry conditions laid down in Article 5(1)(a), (c), (d) and (e) of the Schengen Borders Code must be fulfilled; (ii) to issue a visa despite an objection by the Member State consulted in accordance with Article 22 to the issuing of a uniform visa; or (iii) to issue a visa for reasons of urgency, although the prior consultation in accordance with Article 22 has not been carried out; or (a) when the Member State concerned considers it necessary on humanitarian grounds, for reasons of national interest or because of international obligations, (i) to derogate from the principle that the entry conditions laid down in Article 5(1)(a), (c), (d) and (e) of the Schengen Borders Code must be fulfilled; (ii) to issue a visa despite an objection by the Member State consulted in accordance with Article 22 to the issuing of a uniform visa; or (iii) to issue a visa for reasons of urgency, although the prior consultation in accordance with Article 22 has not been carried out; (b) when for reasons deemed justified by the consulate, a new visa is issued for a stay during the same six-month period to an applicant who, over this six-month period, has already used a uniform visa or a visa with limited territorial validity allowing for a stay of three months. 2. A visa with limited territorial validity shall be valid for the territory of the issuing Member State. It may exceptionally be valid for the territory of more than one Member State, subject to the consent of each such Member State. 3. If the applicant holds a travel document that is not recognised by one or more, but not all Member States, a visa valid for the territory of the Member States recognising the travel document shall be issued. If the issuing Member State does not recognise the applicant’s travel document, the visa issued shall only be valid for that Member State. 4. When a visa with limited territorial validity has been issued in the cases described in paragraph 1(a), the central authorities of the issuing Member State shall circulate the relevant information to the central authorities of the other Member States without delay, by means of the procedure referred to in Article 16(3) of the VIS Regulation. 5. The data set out in Article 10(1) of the VIS Regulation shall be entered into the VIS when a decision on issuing such a visa has been taken.
Amendment rationale: CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL Reasons for and objectives of the proposal The Visa Code is a core element of the common visa policy: it establishes harmonised procedures and conditions for processing visa applications and issuing visas. It entered into force on 5 April 2010, with the overarching objectives of facilitating legitimate travel and tackling irregular immigration, enhancing transparency and legal certainty, strengthening procedural guarantees and reinforcing equal treatment of visa applicants. The Visa Code required the Commission to submit to the European Parliament and the Council an evaluation of its implementation two years after all the provisions of the Regulation had become applicable. It presented its evaluation in a report 1 and accompanying staff working document 2 on 1 April 2014. On the basis of this evaluation, on the same date the Commission adopted a proposal 3 for a recast of the Visa Code with the aim of enhancing travel to the EU through visa policy facilitations (thereby to contributing to tourism, trade, growth and employment in the EU) and to harmonising implementation of the common rules. However, due to divergences in the positions of the European Parliament and the Council, negotiations have not progressed. Meanwhile, greater security and migratory challenges have made it clear that the approach followed in 2014 no longer matches reality. T hese factors prompte d the Commission to announce the withdrawal of its recast proposal in the Commission Work programme for 2018 4 . The formal withdrawal will take place in April 2018. While migration- and security-related objectives have become increasingly important, one should not lose sight of the fact that the vast majority of visa applicants pose no security and/or migratory risk to the EU and are bringing significant benefits to the EU. Therefore, this proposal focuses on streamlining and improving operational aspects of the visa procedure and takes account of the results of negotiations on the Visa Code recast proposal. New elements have been added which were advanced in the Commission's September 2017 Communication on the Delivery of the European Agenda on Migration 5 and in its consultations, such as the need for sufficient financial resources to support Member States' visa processing, clear rules on the issuing of multiple entry visas with a long period of validity and the leverage role that visa policy can exert in the EU's readmission policy. The Commission’s proposal for the reform of the Visa Information System legal framework (to be presented in spring 2018) will further enhance the security and efficiency of the visa procedure, in particular by taking account of technological developments and harnessing them to the benefit of Member States' authorities and bona fide applicants, closing information gaps in some areas, enhancing checks on persons and speeding up the quality and outcome of the procedure.
Revised version (Article 25 Issuing of a visa with limited territorial validity):
2. A visa with limited territorial validity shall be valid for the territory of the issuing Member State. It may exceptionally be valid for the territory of more than one Member State, subject to the consent of each such Member State. 3. If the applicant holds a travel document that is not recognised by one or more, but not all Member States, a visa valid for the territory of the Member States recognising the travel document shall be issued. If the issuing Member State does not recognise the applicant’s travel document, the visa issued shall only be valid for that Member State. 4. When a visa with limited territorial validity has been issued in the cases described in paragraph 1(a), the central authorities of the issuing Member State shall circulate the relevant information to the central authorities of the other Member States without delay, by means of the procedure referred to in Article 16(3) of the VIS Regulation. 5. The data set out in Article 10(1) of the VIS Regulation shall be entered into the VIS when a decision on issuing such a visa has been taken.
Article 26 Issuing of an airport transit visa
1. An airport transit visa shall be valid for transiting through the international transit areas of the airports situated on the territory of Member States. 2. Without prejudice to Article 12(a), the period of validity of the visa shall include an additional ‘period of grace’ of 15 days. Member States may decide not to grant such a period of grace for reasons of public policy or because of the international relations of any of the Member States. 3. Without prejudice to Article 12(a), multiple airport transit visas may be issued with a period of validity of a maximum six months. 4. The following criteria in particular are relevant for taking the decision to issue multiple airport transit visas: (a) the applicant’s need to transit frequently and/or regularly; and (b) the integrity and reliability of the applicant, in particular the lawful use of previous uniform visas, visas with limited territorial validity or airport transit visas, his economic situation in his country of origin and his genuine intention to pursue his onward journey. 5. If the applicant is required to hold an airport transit visa in accordance with the provisions of Article 3(2), the airport transit visa shall be valid only for transiting through the international transit areas of the airports situated on the territory of the Member State(s) concerned. 6. The data set out in Article 10(1) of the VIS Regulation shall be entered into the VIS when a decision on issuing such a visa has been taken.
Article 27 Filling in the visa sticker
1. When the visa sticker is filled in, the mandatory entries set out in Annex VII shall be inserted and the machine-readable zone filled in, as provided for in ICAO document 9303, Part 2. 2. Member States may add national entries in the ‘comments’ section of the visa sticker, which shall not duplicate the mandatory entries in Annex VII. 3. All entries on the visa sticker shall be printed, and no manual changes shall be made to a printed visa sticker. 4. Visa stickers may be filled in manually only in case of technical force majeure. No changes shall be made to a manually filled in visa sticker. 5. When a visa sticker is filled in manually in accordance with paragraph 4 of this Article, this information shall be entered into the VIS in accordance with Article 10(1)(k) of the VIS Regulation.
Amendment rationale: CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL Reasons for and objectives of the proposal The Visa Code is a core element of the common visa policy: it establishes harmonised procedures and conditions for processing visa applications and issuing visas. It entered into force on 5 April 2010, with the overarching objectives of facilitating legitimate travel and tackling irregular immigration, enhancing transparency and legal certainty, strengthening procedural guarantees and reinforcing equal treatment of visa applicants. The Visa Code required the Commission to submit to the European Parliament and the Council an evaluation of its implementation two years after all the provisions of the Regulation had become applicable. It presented its evaluation in a report 1 and accompanying staff working document 2 on 1 April 2014. On the basis of this evaluation, on the same date the Commission adopted a proposal 3 for a recast of the Visa Code with the aim of enhancing travel to the EU through visa policy facilitations (thereby to contributing to tourism, trade, growth and employment in the EU) and to harmonising implementation of the common rules. However, due to divergences in the positions of the European Parliament and the Council, negotiations have not progressed. Meanwhile, greater security and migratory challenges have made it clear that the approach followed in 2014 no longer matches reality. T hese factors prompte d the Commission to announce the withdrawal of its recast proposal in the Commission Work programme for 2018 4 . The formal withdrawal will take place in April 2018. While migration- and security-related objectives have become increasingly important, one should not lose sight of the fact that the vast majority of visa applicants pose no security and/or migratory risk to the EU and are bringing significant benefits to the EU. Therefore, this proposal focuses on streamlining and improving operational aspects of the visa procedure and takes account of the results of negotiations on the Visa Code recast proposal. New elements have been added which were advanced in the Commission's September 2017 Communication on the Delivery of the European Agenda on Migration 5 and in its consultations, such as the need for sufficient financial resources to support Member States' visa processing, clear rules on the issuing of multiple entry visas with a long period of validity and the leverage role that visa policy can exert in the EU's readmission policy. The Commission’s proposal for the reform of the Visa Information System legal framework (to be presented in spring 2018) will further enhance the security and efficiency of the visa procedure, in particular by taking account of technological developments and harnessing them to the benefit of Member States' authorities and bona fide applicants, closing information gaps in some areas, enhancing checks on persons and speeding up the quality and outcome of the procedure.
Revised version (Article 27 Filling in the visa sticker):
1. The Commission shall, by means of implementing acts, adopt the rules for filling in the visa sticker. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 52(2). 2. Member States may add national entries in the ‘comments’ section of the visa sticker. Those entries shall not duplicate the mandatory entries established in accordance with the procedure referred to in paragraph 1. 3. All entries on the visa sticker shall be printed, and no manual changes shall be made to a printed visa sticker. 4. A visa sticker for a visa for one entry may be filled in manually only in the case of technical force majeure . No changes shall be made to a manually filled in visa sticker. 5. When a visa sticker is filled in manually in accordance with paragraph 4 of this Article, this information shall be entered into the VIS in accordance with Article 10(1)(k) of the VIS Regulation.
Article 28 Invalidation of a completed visa sticker
1. If an error is detected on a visa sticker which has not yet been affixed to the travel document, the visa sticker shall be invalidated. 2. If an error is detected after the visa sticker has been affixed to the travel document, the visa sticker shall be invalidated by drawing a cross with indelible ink on the visa sticker and a new visa sticker shall be affixed to a different page. 3. If an error is detected after the relevant data have been introduced into the VIS in accordance with Article 10(1) of the VIS Regulation, the error shall be corrected in accordance with Article 24(1) of that Regulation.
Article 29 Affixing a visa sticker
1. The printed visa sticker containing the data provided for in Article 27 and Annex VII shall be affixed to the travel document in accordance with the provisions set out in Annex VIII. 2. Where the issuing Member State does not recognise the applicant’s travel document, the separate sheet for affixing a visa shall be used. 3. When a visa sticker has been affixed to the separate sheet for affixing a visa, this information shall be entered into the VIS in accordance with Article 10(1)(j) of the VIS Regulation. 4. Individual visas issued to persons who are included in the travel document of the applicant shall be affixed to that travel document. 5. Where the travel document in which such persons are included is not recognised by the issuing Member State, the individual stickers shall be affixed to the separate sheets for affixing a visa.
Amendment rationale: CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL Reasons for and objectives of the proposal The Visa Code is a core element of the common visa policy: it establishes harmonised procedures and conditions for processing visa applications and issuing visas. It entered into force on 5 April 2010, with the overarching objectives of facilitating legitimate travel and tackling irregular immigration, enhancing transparency and legal certainty, strengthening procedural guarantees and reinforcing equal treatment of visa applicants. The Visa Code required the Commission to submit to the European Parliament and the Council an evaluation of its implementation two years after all the provisions of the Regulation had become applicable. It presented its evaluation in a report 1 and accompanying staff working document 2 on 1 April 2014. On the basis of this evaluation, on the same date the Commission adopted a proposal 3 for a recast of the Visa Code with the aim of enhancing travel to the EU through visa policy facilitations (thereby to contributing to tourism, trade, growth and employment in the EU) and to harmonising implementation of the common rules. However, due to divergences in the positions of the European Parliament and the Council, negotiations have not progressed. Meanwhile, greater security and migratory challenges have made it clear that the approach followed in 2014 no longer matches reality. T hese factors prompte d the Commission to announce the withdrawal of its recast proposal in the Commission Work programme for 2018 4 . The formal withdrawal will take place in April 2018. While migration- and security-related objectives have become increasingly important, one should not lose sight of the fact that the vast majority of visa applicants pose no security and/or migratory risk to the EU and are bringing significant benefits to the EU. Therefore, this proposal focuses on streamlining and improving operational aspects of the visa procedure and takes account of the results of negotiations on the Visa Code recast proposal. New elements have been added which were advanced in the Commission's September 2017 Communication on the Delivery of the European Agenda on Migration 5 and in its consultations, such as the need for sufficient financial resources to support Member States' visa processing, clear rules on the issuing of multiple entry visas with a long period of validity and the leverage role that visa policy can exert in the EU's readmission policy. The Commission’s proposal for the reform of the Visa Information System legal framework (to be presented in spring 2018) will further enhance the security and efficiency of the visa procedure, in particular by taking account of technological developments and harnessing them to the benefit of Member States' authorities and bona fide applicants, closing information gaps in some areas, enhancing checks on persons and speeding up the quality and outcome of the procedure.
Revised version (Article 29 Affixing a visa sticker):
1. The visa sticker shall be affixed to the travel document. 1a. The Commission shall by means of implementing acts adopt the detailed rules for affixing the visa sticker. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 52(2). 2. Where the issuing Member State does not recognise the applicant’s travel document, the separate sheet for affixing a visa shall be used. 3. When a visa sticker has been affixed to the separate sheet for affixing a visa, this information shall be entered into the VIS in accordance with Article 10(1)(j) of the VIS Regulation. 4. Individual visas issued to persons who are included in the travel document of the applicant shall be affixed to that travel document. 5. Where the travel document in which such persons are included is not recognised by the issuing Member State, the individual stickers shall be affixed to the separate sheets for affixing a visa.
Article 30 Rights derived from an issued visa
Mere possession of a uniform visa or a visa with limited territorial validity shall not confer an automatic right of entry.
Article 31 Information of central authorities of other Member States
1. A Member State may require that its central authorities be informed of visas issued by consulates of other Member States to nationals of specific third countries or to specific categories of such nationals, except in the case of airport transit visas. 2. Member States shall notify the Commission of the introduction or withdrawal of the requirement for such information before it becomes applicable. This information shall also be given within local Schengen cooperation in the jurisdiction concerned. 3. The Commission shall inform Member States of such notifications. 4. From the date referred to in Article 46 of the VIS Regulation, information shall be transmitted in accordance with Article 16(3) of that Regulation.
Amendment rationale: CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL Reasons for and objectives of the proposal The Visa Code is a core element of the common visa policy: it establishes harmonised procedures and conditions for processing visa applications and issuing visas. It entered into force on 5 April 2010, with the overarching objectives of facilitating legitimate travel and tackling irregular immigration, enhancing transparency and legal certainty, strengthening procedural guarantees and reinforcing equal treatment of visa applicants. The Visa Code required the Commission to submit to the European Parliament and the Council an evaluation of its implementation two years after all the provisions of the Regulation had become applicable. It presented its evaluation in a report 1 and accompanying staff working document 2 on 1 April 2014. On the basis of this evaluation, on the same date the Commission adopted a proposal 3 for a recast of the Visa Code with the aim of enhancing travel to the EU through visa policy facilitations (thereby to contributing to tourism, trade, growth and employment in the EU) and to harmonising implementation of the common rules. However, due to divergences in the positions of the European Parliament and the Council, negotiations have not progressed. Meanwhile, greater security and migratory challenges have made it clear that the approach followed in 2014 no longer matches reality. T hese factors prompte d the Commission to announce the withdrawal of its recast proposal in the Commission Work programme for 2018 4 . The formal withdrawal will take place in April 2018. While migration- and security-related objectives have become increasingly important, one should not lose sight of the fact that the vast majority of visa applicants pose no security and/or migratory risk to the EU and are bringing significant benefits to the EU. Therefore, this proposal focuses on streamlining and improving operational aspects of the visa procedure and takes account of the results of negotiations on the Visa Code recast proposal. New elements have been added which were advanced in the Commission's September 2017 Communication on the Delivery of the European Agenda on Migration 5 and in its consultations, such as the need for sufficient financial resources to support Member States' visa processing, clear rules on the issuing of multiple entry visas with a long period of validity and the leverage role that visa policy can exert in the EU's readmission policy. The Commission’s proposal for the reform of the Visa Information System legal framework (to be presented in spring 2018) will further enhance the security and efficiency of the visa procedure, in particular by taking account of technological developments and harnessing them to the benefit of Member States' authorities and bona fide applicants, closing information gaps in some areas, enhancing checks on persons and speeding up the quality and outcome of the procedure.
Revised version (Article 31 Information of central authorities of other Member States):
1. A Member State may require that its central authorities be informed of visas issued by other Member States to nationals of specific third countries or to specific categories of such nationals, except in the case of airport transit visas. 2. Member States shall notify the Commission of the introduction or withdrawal of the requirement for such information at the latest 25 calendar days before it becomes applicable. That information shall also be given under local Schengen cooperation in the jurisdiction concerned. 3. The Commission shall inform Member States of such notifications.
Article 32 Refusal of a visa
1. Without prejudice to Article 25(1), a visa shall be refused: (a) if the applicant: (i) presents a travel document which is false, counterfeit or forged; (ii) does not provide justification for the purpose and conditions of the intended stay; (iii) does not provide proof of sufficient means of subsistence, both for the duration of the intended stay and for the return to his country of origin or residence, or for the transit to a third country into which he is certain to be admitted, or is not in a position to acquire such means lawfully; (iv) has already stayed for three months during the current six-month period on the territory of the Member States on the basis of a uniform visa or a visa with limited territorial validity; (v) is a person for whom an alert has been issued in the SIS for the purpose of refusing entry; (vi) is considered to be a threat to public policy, internal security or public health as defined in Article 2(19) of the Schengen Borders Code or to the international relations of any of the Member States, in particular where an alert has been issued in Member States’ national databases for the purpose of refusing entry on the same grounds; or (vii) does not provide proof of holding adequate and valid travel medical insurance, where applicable; or (a) if the applicant: (i) presents a travel document which is false, counterfeit or forged; (ii) does not provide justification for the purpose and conditions of the intended stay; (iii) does not provide proof of sufficient means of subsistence, both for the duration of the intended stay and for the return to his country of origin or residence, or for the transit to a third country into which he is certain to be admitted, or is not in a position to acquire such means lawfully; (iv) has already stayed for three months during the current six-month period on the territory of the Member States on the basis of a uniform visa or a visa with limited territorial validity; (v) is a person for whom an alert has been issued in the SIS for the purpose of refusing entry; (vi) is considered to be a threat to public policy, internal security or public health as defined in Article 2(19) of the Schengen Borders Code or to the international relations of any of the Member States, in particular where an alert has been issued in Member States’ national databases for the purpose of refusing entry on the same grounds; or (vii) does not provide proof of holding adequate and valid travel medical insurance, where applicable; (b) if there are reasonable doubts as to the authenticity of the supporting documents submitted by the applicant or the veracity of their contents, the reliability of the statements made by the applicant or his intention to leave the territory of the Member States before the expiry of the visa applied for. 2. A decision on refusal and the reasons on which it is based shall be notified to the applicant by means of the standard form set out in Annex VI. 3. Applicants who have been refused a visa shall have the right to appeal. Appeals shall be conducted against the Member State that has taken the final decision on the application and in accordance with the national law of that Member State. Member States shall provide applicants with information regarding the procedure to be followed in the event of an appeal, as specified in Annex VI. 4. In the cases referred to in Article 8(2), the consulate of the representing Member State shall inform the applicant of the decision taken by the represented Member State. 5. Information on a refused visa shall be entered into the VIS in accordance with Article 12 of the VIS Regulation.
Amendment rationale: CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL Reasons for and objectives of the proposal The Visa Code is a core element of the common visa policy: it establishes harmonised procedures and conditions for processing visa applications and issuing visas. It entered into force on 5 April 2010, with the overarching objectives of facilitating legitimate travel and tackling irregular immigration, enhancing transparency and legal certainty, strengthening procedural guarantees and reinforcing equal treatment of visa applicants. The Visa Code required the Commission to submit to the European Parliament and the Council an evaluation of its implementation two years after all the provisions of the Regulation had become applicable. It presented its evaluation in a report 1 and accompanying staff working document 2 on 1 April 2014. On the basis of this evaluation, on the same date the Commission adopted a proposal 3 for a recast of the Visa Code with the aim of enhancing travel to the EU through visa policy facilitations (thereby to contributing to tourism, trade, growth and employment in the EU) and to harmonising implementation of the common rules. However, due to divergences in the positions of the European Parliament and the Council, negotiations have not progressed. Meanwhile, greater security and migratory challenges have made it clear that the approach followed in 2014 no longer matches reality. T hese factors prompte d the Commission to announce the withdrawal of its recast proposal in the Commission Work programme for 2018 4 . The formal withdrawal will take place in April 2018. While migration- and security-related objectives have become increasingly important, one should not lose sight of the fact that the vast majority of visa applicants pose no security and/or migratory risk to the EU and are bringing significant benefits to the EU. Therefore, this proposal focuses on streamlining and improving operational aspects of the visa procedure and takes account of the results of negotiations on the Visa Code recast proposal. New elements have been added which were advanced in the Commission's September 2017 Communication on the Delivery of the European Agenda on Migration 5 and in its consultations, such as the need for sufficient financial resources to support Member States' visa processing, clear rules on the issuing of multiple entry visas with a long period of validity and the leverage role that visa policy can exert in the EU's readmission policy. The Commission’s proposal for the reform of the Visa Information System legal framework (to be presented in spring 2018) will further enhance the security and efficiency of the visa procedure, in particular by taking account of technological developments and harnessing them to the benefit of Member States' authorities and bona fide applicants, closing information gaps in some areas, enhancing checks on persons and speeding up the quality and outcome of the procedure.
Revised version (Article 32 Refusal of a visa):
2. A decision on refusal and the reasons on which it is based shall be notified to the applicant by means of the standard form set out in Annex VI in the language of the Member State that has taken the final decision on the application and another official language of the institutions of the Union. 3. Applicants who have been refused a visa shall have the right to appeal. Appeals shall be conducted against the Member State that has taken the final decision on the application and in accordance with the national law of that Member State. Member States shall provide applicants with information regarding the procedure to be followed in the event of an appeal, as specified in Annex VI. 5. Information on a refused visa shall be entered into the VIS in accordance with Article 12 of the VIS Regulation.
Article 33 Extension
1. The period of validity and/or the duration of stay of an issued visa shall be extended where the competent authority of a Member State considers that a visa holder has provided proof of force majeure or humanitarian reasons preventing him from leaving the territory of the Member States before the expiry of the period of validity of or the duration of stay authorised by the visa. Such an extension shall be granted free of charge. 2. The period of validity and/or the duration of stay of an issued visa may be extended if the visa holder provides proof of serious personal reasons justifying the extension of the period of validity or the duration of stay. A fee of EUR 30 shall be charged for such an extension. 3. Unless otherwise decided by the authority extending the visa, the territorial validity of the extended visa shall remain the same as that of the original visa. 4. The authority competent to extend the visa shall be that of the Member State on whose territory the third-country national is present at the moment of applying for an extension. 5. Member States shall notify to the Commission the authorities competent for extending visas. 6. Extension of visas shall take the form of a visa sticker. 7. Information on an extended visa shall be entered into the VIS in accordance with Article 14 of the VIS Regulation.
Article 34 Annulment and revocation
1. A visa shall be annulled where it becomes evident that the conditions for issuing it were not met at the time when it was issued, in particular if there are serious grounds for believing that the visa was fraudulently obtained. A visa shall in principle be annulled by the competent authorities of the Member State which issued it. A visa may be annulled by the competent authorities of another Member State, in which case the authorities of the Member State that issued the visa shall be informed of such annulment. 2. A visa shall be revoked where it becomes evident that the conditions for issuing it are no longer met. A visa shall in principle be revoked by the competent authorities of the Member State which issued it. A visa may be revoked by the competent authorities of another Member State, in which case the authorities of the Member State that issued the visa shall be informed of such revocation. 3. A visa may be revoked at the request of the visa holder. The competent authorities of the Member States that issued the visa shall be informed of such revocation. 4. Failure of the visa holder to produce, at the border, one or more of the supporting documents referred to in Article 14(3), shall not automatically lead to a decision to annul or revoke the visa. 5. If a visa is annulled or revoked, a stamp stating ‘ANNULLED’ or ‘REVOKED’ shall be affixed to it and the optically variable feature of the visa sticker, the security feature ‘latent image effect’ as well as the term ‘visa’ shall be invalidated by being crossed out. 6. A decision on annulment or revocation of a visa and the reasons on which it is based shall be notified to the applicant by means of the standard form set out in Annex VI. 7. A visa holder whose visa has been annulled or revoked shall have the right to appeal, unless the visa was revoked at his request in accordance with paragraph 3. Appeals shall be conducted against the Member State that has taken the decision on the annulment or revocation and in accordance with the national law of that Member State. Member States shall provide applicants with information regarding the procedure to be followed in the event of an appeal, as specified in Annex VI. 8. Information on an annulled or a revoked visa shall be entered into the VIS in accordance with Article 13 of the VIS Regulation.
Article 35 Visas applied for at the external border
1. In exceptional cases, visas may be issued at border crossing points if the following conditions are satisfied: (a) the applicant fulfils the conditions laid down in Article 5(1)(a), (c), (d) and (e) of the Schengen Borders Code; (b) the applicant has not been in a position to apply for a visa in advance and submits, if required, supporting documents substantiating unforeseeable and imperative reasons for entry; and (c) the applicant’s return to his country of origin or residence or transit through States other than Member States fully implementing the Schengen acquis is assessed as certain. 2. Where a visa is applied for at the external border, the requirement that the applicant be in possession of travel medical insurance may be waived when such travel medical insurance is not available at that border crossing point or for humanitarian reasons. 3. A visa issued at the external border shall be a uniform visa, entitling the holder to stay for a maximum duration of 15 days, depending on the purpose and conditions of the intended stay. In the case of transit, the length of the authorised stay shall correspond to the time necessary for the purpose of the transit. 4. Where the conditions laid down in Article 5(1)(a), (c), (d) and (e) of the Schengen Borders Code are not fulfilled, the authorities responsible for issuing the visa at the border may issue a visa with limited territorial validity, in accordance with Article 25(1)(a) of this Regulation, for the territory of the issuing Member State only. 5. A third-country national falling within a category of persons for whom prior consultation is required in accordance with Article 22 shall, in principle, not be issued a visa at the external border. However, a visa with limited territorial validity for the territory of the issuing Member State may be issued at the external border for such persons in exceptional cases, in accordance with Article 25(1)(a). 6. In addition to the reasons for refusing a visa as provided for in Article 32(1) a visa shall be refused at the border crossing point if the conditions referred to in paragraph 1(b) of this Article are not met. 7. The provisions on justification and notification of refusals and the right of appeal set out in Article 32(3) and Annex VI shall apply.
Amendment rationale: CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL Reasons for and objectives of the proposal The Visa Code is a core element of the common visa policy: it establishes harmonised procedures and conditions for processing visa applications and issuing visas. It entered into force on 5 April 2010, with the overarching objectives of facilitating legitimate travel and tackling irregular immigration, enhancing transparency and legal certainty, strengthening procedural guarantees and reinforcing equal treatment of visa applicants. The Visa Code required the Commission to submit to the European Parliament and the Council an evaluation of its implementation two years after all the provisions of the Regulation had become applicable. It presented its evaluation in a report 1 and accompanying staff working document 2 on 1 April 2014. On the basis of this evaluation, on the same date the Commission adopted a proposal 3 for a recast of the Visa Code with the aim of enhancing travel to the EU through visa policy facilitations (thereby to contributing to tourism, trade, growth and employment in the EU) and to harmonising implementation of the common rules. However, due to divergences in the positions of the European Parliament and the Council, negotiations have not progressed. Meanwhile, greater security and migratory challenges have made it clear that the approach followed in 2014 no longer matches reality. T hese factors prompte d the Commission to announce the withdrawal of its recast proposal in the Commission Work programme for 2018 4 . The formal withdrawal will take place in April 2018. While migration- and security-related objectives have become increasingly important, one should not lose sight of the fact that the vast majority of visa applicants pose no security and/or migratory risk to the EU and are bringing significant benefits to the EU. Therefore, this proposal focuses on streamlining and improving operational aspects of the visa procedure and takes account of the results of negotiations on the Visa Code recast proposal. New elements have been added which were advanced in the Commission's September 2017 Communication on the Delivery of the European Agenda on Migration 5 and in its consultations, such as the need for sufficient financial resources to support Member States' visa processing, clear rules on the issuing of multiple entry visas with a long period of validity and the leverage role that visa policy can exert in the EU's readmission policy. The Commission’s proposal for the reform of the Visa Information System legal framework (to be presented in spring 2018) will further enhance the security and efficiency of the visa procedure, in particular by taking account of technological developments and harnessing them to the benefit of Member States' authorities and bona fide applicants, closing information gaps in some areas, enhancing checks on persons and speeding up the quality and outcome of the procedure.
Revised version (Article 35 Visas applied for at the external border):
2. Where a visa is applied for at the external border, the requirement that the applicant be in possession of travel medical insurance may be waived when such travel medical insurance is not available at that border crossing point or for humanitarian reasons. 3. A visa issued at the external border shall be a uniform visa, entitling the holder to stay for a maximum duration of 15 days, depending on the purpose and conditions of the intended stay. In the case of transit, the length of the authorised stay shall correspond to the time necessary for the purpose of the transit. 4. Where the conditions laid down in Article 5(1)(a), (c), (d) and (e) of the Schengen Borders Code are not fulfilled, the authorities responsible for issuing the visa at the border may issue a visa with limited territorial validity, in accordance with Article 25(1)(a) of this Regulation, for the territory of the issuing Member State only. 5. A third-country national falling within a category of persons for whom prior consultation is required in accordance with Article 22 shall, in principle, not be issued a visa at the external border. However, a visa with limited territorial validity for the territory of the issuing Member State may be issued at the external border for such persons in exceptional cases, in accordance with Article 25(1)(a). 6. In addition to the reasons for refusing a visa as provided for in Article 32(1) a visa shall be refused at the border crossing point if the conditions referred to in paragraph 1(b) of this Article are not met. 7. The provisions on justification and notification of refusals and the right of appeal set out in Article 32(3) and Annex VI shall apply.
Article 36 Visas issued to seafarers in transit at the external border
1. A seafarer who is required to be in possession of a visa when crossing the external borders of the Member States may be issued with a visa for the purpose of transit at the border where: (a) he fulfils the conditions set out in Article 35(1); and (b) he is crossing the border in question in order to embark on, re-embark on or disembark from a ship on which he will work or has worked as a seafarer. 2. Before issuing a visa at the border to a seafarer in transit, the competent national authorities shall comply with the rules set out in Annex IX, Part 1, and make sure that the necessary information concerning the seafarer in question has been exchanged by means of a duly completed form for seafarers in transit, as set out in Annex IX, Part 2. 3. This Article shall apply without prejudice to Article 35(3), (4) and (5).
Amendment rationale: CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL Reasons for and objectives of the proposal The Visa Code is a core element of the common visa policy: it establishes harmonised procedures and conditions for processing visa applications and issuing visas. It entered into force on 5 April 2010, with the overarching objectives of facilitating legitimate travel and tackling irregular immigration, enhancing transparency and legal certainty, strengthening procedural guarantees and reinforcing equal treatment of visa applicants. The Visa Code required the Commission to submit to the European Parliament and the Council an evaluation of its implementation two years after all the provisions of the Regulation had become applicable. It presented its evaluation in a report 1 and accompanying staff working document 2 on 1 April 2014. On the basis of this evaluation, on the same date the Commission adopted a proposal 3 for a recast of the Visa Code with the aim of enhancing travel to the EU through visa policy facilitations (thereby to contributing to tourism, trade, growth and employment in the EU) and to harmonising implementation of the common rules. However, due to divergences in the positions of the European Parliament and the Council, negotiations have not progressed. Meanwhile, greater security and migratory challenges have made it clear that the approach followed in 2014 no longer matches reality. T hese factors prompte d the Commission to announce the withdrawal of its recast proposal in the Commission Work programme for 2018 4 . The formal withdrawal will take place in April 2018. While migration- and security-related objectives have become increasingly important, one should not lose sight of the fact that the vast majority of visa applicants pose no security and/or migratory risk to the EU and are bringing significant benefits to the EU. Therefore, this proposal focuses on streamlining and improving operational aspects of the visa procedure and takes account of the results of negotiations on the Visa Code recast proposal. New elements have been added which were advanced in the Commission's September 2017 Communication on the Delivery of the European Agenda on Migration 5 and in its consultations, such as the need for sufficient financial resources to support Member States' visa processing, clear rules on the issuing of multiple entry visas with a long period of validity and the leverage role that visa policy can exert in the EU's readmission policy. The Commission’s proposal for the reform of the Visa Information System legal framework (to be presented in spring 2018) will further enhance the security and efficiency of the visa procedure, in particular by taking account of technological developments and harnessing them to the benefit of Member States' authorities and bona fide applicants, closing information gaps in some areas, enhancing checks on persons and speeding up the quality and outcome of the procedure.
Revised version (Article 36 Visas issued to seafarers in transit at the external border):
2a. The Commission shall by means of implementing acts adopt operational instructions for issuing visas at the border to seafarers. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 52(2). 3. This Article shall apply without prejudice to Article 35(3), (4) and (5).
Article 37 Organisation of visa sections
1. Member States shall be responsible for organising the visa sections of their consulates. In order to prevent any decline in the level of vigilance and to protect staff from being exposed to pressure at local level, rotation schemes for staff dealing directly with applicants shall be set up, where appropriate. Particular attention shall be paid to clear work structures and a distinct allocation/division of responsibilities in relation to the taking of final decisions on applications. Access to consultation of the VIS and the SIS and other confidential information shall be restricted to a limited number of duly authorised staff. Appropriate measures shall be taken to prevent unauthorised access to such databases. 2. The storage and handling of visa stickers shall be subject to adequate security measures to avoid fraud or loss. Each consulate shall keep an account of its stock of visa stickers and register how each visa sticker has been used. 3. Member States’ consulates shall keep archives of applications. Each individual file shall contain the application form, copies of relevant supporting documents, a record of checks made and the reference number of the visa issued, in order for staff to be able to reconstruct, if need be, the background for the decision taken on the application. Individual application files shall be kept for a minimum of two years from the date of the decision on the application as referred to in Article 23(1).
Amendment rationale: CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL Reasons for and objectives of the proposal The Visa Code is a core element of the common visa policy: it establishes harmonised procedures and conditions for processing visa applications and issuing visas. It entered into force on 5 April 2010, with the overarching objectives of facilitating legitimate travel and tackling irregular immigration, enhancing transparency and legal certainty, strengthening procedural guarantees and reinforcing equal treatment of visa applicants. The Visa Code required the Commission to submit to the European Parliament and the Council an evaluation of its implementation two years after all the provisions of the Regulation had become applicable. It presented its evaluation in a report 1 and accompanying staff working document 2 on 1 April 2014. On the basis of this evaluation, on the same date the Commission adopted a proposal 3 for a recast of the Visa Code with the aim of enhancing travel to the EU through visa policy facilitations (thereby to contributing to tourism, trade, growth and employment in the EU) and to harmonising implementation of the common rules. However, due to divergences in the positions of the European Parliament and the Council, negotiations have not progressed. Meanwhile, greater security and migratory challenges have made it clear that the approach followed in 2014 no longer matches reality. T hese factors prompte d the Commission to announce the withdrawal of its recast proposal in the Commission Work programme for 2018 4 . The formal withdrawal will take place in April 2018. While migration- and security-related objectives have become increasingly important, one should not lose sight of the fact that the vast majority of visa applicants pose no security and/or migratory risk to the EU and are bringing significant benefits to the EU. Therefore, this proposal focuses on streamlining and improving operational aspects of the visa procedure and takes account of the results of negotiations on the Visa Code recast proposal. New elements have been added which were advanced in the Commission's September 2017 Communication on the Delivery of the European Agenda on Migration 5 and in its consultations, such as the need for sufficient financial resources to support Member States' visa processing, clear rules on the issuing of multiple entry visas with a long period of validity and the leverage role that visa policy can exert in the EU's readmission policy. The Commission’s proposal for the reform of the Visa Information System legal framework (to be presented in spring 2018) will further enhance the security and efficiency of the visa procedure, in particular by taking account of technological developments and harnessing them to the benefit of Member States' authorities and bona fide applicants, closing information gaps in some areas, enhancing checks on persons and speeding up the quality and outcome of the procedure.
Revised version (Article 37 Organisation of visa sections):
1. Member States shall be responsible for organising the visa sections of their consulates. In order to prevent any decline in the level of vigilance and to protect staff from being exposed to pressure at local level, rotation schemes for staff dealing directly with applicants shall be set up, where appropriate. Particular attention shall be paid to clear work structures and a distinct allocation/division of responsibilities in relation to the taking of final decisions on applications. Access to consultation of the VIS and the SIS and other confidential information shall be restricted to a limited number of duly authorised staff. Appropriate measures shall be taken to prevent unauthorised access to such databases. 2. The storage and handling of visa stickers shall be subject to adequate security measures to avoid fraud or loss. Each consulate shall keep an account of its stock of visa stickers and register how each visa sticker has been used. Any significant loss of blank visa stickers shall be reported to the Commission. 3. Consulates or central authorities shall keep archives of applications in paper or electronic format. Each individual file shall contain the relevant information allowing for a reconstruction, if need be, of the background for the decision taken on the application. Individual application files shall be kept for a minimum of one year from the date of the decision on the application as referred to in Article 23(1) or, in the case of appeal, until the end of the appeal procedure, whichever is the longest. If applicable, the individual electronic application files shall be kept for the period of validity of the issued visa.
Article 38 Resources for examining applications and monitoring of consulates
1. Member States shall deploy appropriate staff in sufficient numbers to carry out the tasks relating to the examining of applications, in such a way as to ensure reasonable and harmonised quality of service to the public. 2. Premises shall meet appropriate functional requirements of adequacy and allow for appropriate security measures. 3. Member States’ central authorities shall provide adequate training to both expatriate staff and locally employed staff and shall be responsible for providing them with complete, precise and up-to-date information on the relevant Community and national law. 4. Member States’ central authorities shall ensure frequent and adequate monitoring of the conduct of examination of applications and take corrective measures when deviations from the provisions of this Regulation are detected.
Amendment rationale: CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL Reasons for and objectives of the proposal The Visa Code is a core element of the common visa policy: it establishes harmonised procedures and conditions for processing visa applications and issuing visas. It entered into force on 5 April 2010, with the overarching objectives of facilitating legitimate travel and tackling irregular immigration, enhancing transparency and legal certainty, strengthening procedural guarantees and reinforcing equal treatment of visa applicants. The Visa Code required the Commission to submit to the European Parliament and the Council an evaluation of its implementation two years after all the provisions of the Regulation had become applicable. It presented its evaluation in a report 1 and accompanying staff working document 2 on 1 April 2014. On the basis of this evaluation, on the same date the Commission adopted a proposal 3 for a recast of the Visa Code with the aim of enhancing travel to the EU through visa policy facilitations (thereby to contributing to tourism, trade, growth and employment in the EU) and to harmonising implementation of the common rules. However, due to divergences in the positions of the European Parliament and the Council, negotiations have not progressed. Meanwhile, greater security and migratory challenges have made it clear that the approach followed in 2014 no longer matches reality. T hese factors prompte d the Commission to announce the withdrawal of its recast proposal in the Commission Work programme for 2018 4 . The formal withdrawal will take place in April 2018. While migration- and security-related objectives have become increasingly important, one should not lose sight of the fact that the vast majority of visa applicants pose no security and/or migratory risk to the EU and are bringing significant benefits to the EU. Therefore, this proposal focuses on streamlining and improving operational aspects of the visa procedure and takes account of the results of negotiations on the Visa Code recast proposal. New elements have been added which were advanced in the Commission's September 2017 Communication on the Delivery of the European Agenda on Migration 5 and in its consultations, such as the need for sufficient financial resources to support Member States' visa processing, clear rules on the issuing of multiple entry visas with a long period of validity and the leverage role that visa policy can exert in the EU's readmission policy. The Commission’s proposal for the reform of the Visa Information System legal framework (to be presented in spring 2018) will further enhance the security and efficiency of the visa procedure, in particular by taking account of technological developments and harnessing them to the benefit of Member States' authorities and bona fide applicants, closing information gaps in some areas, enhancing checks on persons and speeding up the quality and outcome of the procedure.
Revised version (Article 38 Resources for examining applications and monitoring visa procedures):
1. Member States shall deploy appropriate staff in sufficient numbers in consulates to carry out the tasks relating to the examination of applications, in such a way as to ensure a reasonable and harmonised quality of service to the public. 1a. Member States shall ensure that the entire visa procedure in consulates, including the lodging and handling of applications, the printing of visa stickers and the practical cooperation with external service providers, is monitored by expatriate staff to ensure the integrity of all stages of the procedure. 2. Premises shall meet appropriate functional requirements of adequacy and allow for appropriate security measures. 3. Member States' central authorities shall provide adequate training to both expatriate staff and locally employed staff and shall be responsible for providing them with complete, precise and up-to-date information on the relevant Union and national law. 3a. Where applications are examined and decided on by central authorities as referred to in Article 4(1a), the Member States shall provide specific training to ensure that the staff of those central authorities have sufficient and updated country-specific knowledge of local socio-economic circumstances, and complete, precise and up-to-date information on relevant Union and national law. 3b. Member States shall also ensure that consulates have sufficient and adequately trained staff for assisting the central authorities in examining and deciding on applications, notably by participating in local Schengen cooperation meetings, exchanging information with other consulates and local authorities, gathering relevant information locally on migratory risk and fraudulent practices, and conducting interviews and additional examinations. 4. Member States’ central authorities shall ensure frequent and adequate monitoring of the conduct of examination of applications and take corrective measures when deviations from the provisions of this Regulation are detected. 5. Member States shall ensure that a procedure is in place which allows applicants to submit complaints regarding: (a) the conduct of staff at consulates and, where applicable, of the external service providers; or (b) the application process. Consulates or central authorities shall keep a record of complaints and the follow-up given. Member States shall make information on the procedure provided for in this paragraph available to the public.
Article 39 Conduct of staff
1. Member States’ consulates shall ensure that applicants are received courteously. 2. Consular staff shall, in the performance of their duties, fully respect human dignity. Any measures taken shall be proportionate to the objectives pursued by such measures. 3. While performing their tasks, consular staff shall not discriminate against persons on grounds of sex, racial or ethnic origin, religion or belief, disability, age or sexual orientation.
Amendment rationale: CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL Reasons for and objectives of the proposal The Visa Code is a core element of the common visa policy: it establishes harmonised procedures and conditions for processing visa applications and issuing visas. It entered into force on 5 April 2010, with the overarching objectives of facilitating legitimate travel and tackling irregular immigration, enhancing transparency and legal certainty, strengthening procedural guarantees and reinforcing equal treatment of visa applicants. The Visa Code required the Commission to submit to the European Parliament and the Council an evaluation of its implementation two years after all the provisions of the Regulation had become applicable. It presented its evaluation in a report 1 and accompanying staff working document 2 on 1 April 2014. On the basis of this evaluation, on the same date the Commission adopted a proposal 3 for a recast of the Visa Code with the aim of enhancing travel to the EU through visa policy facilitations (thereby to contributing to tourism, trade, growth and employment in the EU) and to harmonising implementation of the common rules. However, due to divergences in the positions of the European Parliament and the Council, negotiations have not progressed. Meanwhile, greater security and migratory challenges have made it clear that the approach followed in 2014 no longer matches reality. T hese factors prompte d the Commission to announce the withdrawal of its recast proposal in the Commission Work programme for 2018 4 . The formal withdrawal will take place in April 2018. While migration- and security-related objectives have become increasingly important, one should not lose sight of the fact that the vast majority of visa applicants pose no security and/or migratory risk to the EU and are bringing significant benefits to the EU. Therefore, this proposal focuses on streamlining and improving operational aspects of the visa procedure and takes account of the results of negotiations on the Visa Code recast proposal. New elements have been added which were advanced in the Commission's September 2017 Communication on the Delivery of the European Agenda on Migration 5 and in its consultations, such as the need for sufficient financial resources to support Member States' visa processing, clear rules on the issuing of multiple entry visas with a long period of validity and the leverage role that visa policy can exert in the EU's readmission policy. The Commission’s proposal for the reform of the Visa Information System legal framework (to be presented in spring 2018) will further enhance the security and efficiency of the visa procedure, in particular by taking account of technological developments and harnessing them to the benefit of Member States' authorities and bona fide applicants, closing information gaps in some areas, enhancing checks on persons and speeding up the quality and outcome of the procedure.
Revised version (Article 39 Conduct of staff):
1. Member States’ consulates shall ensure that applicants are received courteously. 2. Consular and central authorities' staff shall, in the performance of their duties, fully respect human dignity. Any measures taken shall be proportionate to the objectives pursued by such measures. 3. While performing their tasks, consular and central authorities' staff shall not discriminate against persons on grounds of sex, racial or ethnic origin, religion or belief, disability, age or sexual orientation.
Article 40 Forms of cooperation
1. Each Member State shall be responsible for organising the procedures relating to applications. In principle, applications shall be lodged at a consulate of a Member State. 2. Member States shall: (a) equip their consulates and authorities responsible for issuing visas at the borders with the required material for the collection of biometric identifiers, as well as the offices of their honorary consuls, whenever they make use of them, to collect biometric identifiers in accordance with Article 42; and/or (b) cooperate with one or more other Member States, within the framework of local Schengen cooperation or by other appropriate contacts, in the form of limited representation, co-location, or a Common Application Centre in accordance with Article 41. 3. In particular circumstances or for reasons relating to the local situation, such as where: (a) the high number of applicants does not allow the collection of applications and of data to be organised in a timely manner and in decent conditions; or (b) it is not possible to ensure a good territorial coverage of the third country concerned in any other way; and where the forms of cooperation referred to in paragraph 2(b) prove not to be appropriate for the Member State concerned, a Member State may, as a last resort, cooperate with an external service provider in accordance with Article 43. 4. Without prejudice to the right to call the applicant for a personal interview, as provided for in Article 21(8), the selection of a form of organisation shall not lead to the applicant being required to appear in person at more than one location in order to lodge an application. 5. Member States shall notify to the Commission how they intend to organise the procedures relating to applications in each consular location.
Amendment rationale: CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL Reasons for and objectives of the proposal The Visa Code is a core element of the common visa policy: it establishes harmonised procedures and conditions for processing visa applications and issuing visas. It entered into force on 5 April 2010, with the overarching objectives of facilitating legitimate travel and tackling irregular immigration, enhancing transparency and legal certainty, strengthening procedural guarantees and reinforcing equal treatment of visa applicants. The Visa Code required the Commission to submit to the European Parliament and the Council an evaluation of its implementation two years after all the provisions of the Regulation had become applicable. It presented its evaluation in a report 1 and accompanying staff working document 2 on 1 April 2014. On the basis of this evaluation, on the same date the Commission adopted a proposal 3 for a recast of the Visa Code with the aim of enhancing travel to the EU through visa policy facilitations (thereby to contributing to tourism, trade, growth and employment in the EU) and to harmonising implementation of the common rules. However, due to divergences in the positions of the European Parliament and the Council, negotiations have not progressed. Meanwhile, greater security and migratory challenges have made it clear that the approach followed in 2014 no longer matches reality. T hese factors prompte d the Commission to announce the withdrawal of its recast proposal in the Commission Work programme for 2018 4 . The formal withdrawal will take place in April 2018. While migration- and security-related objectives have become increasingly important, one should not lose sight of the fact that the vast majority of visa applicants pose no security and/or migratory risk to the EU and are bringing significant benefits to the EU. Therefore, this proposal focuses on streamlining and improving operational aspects of the visa procedure and takes account of the results of negotiations on the Visa Code recast proposal. New elements have been added which were advanced in the Commission's September 2017 Communication on the Delivery of the European Agenda on Migration 5 and in its consultations, such as the need for sufficient financial resources to support Member States' visa processing, clear rules on the issuing of multiple entry visas with a long period of validity and the leverage role that visa policy can exert in the EU's readmission policy. The Commission’s proposal for the reform of the Visa Information System legal framework (to be presented in spring 2018) will further enhance the security and efficiency of the visa procedure, in particular by taking account of technological developments and harnessing them to the benefit of Member States' authorities and bona fide applicants, closing information gaps in some areas, enhancing checks on persons and speeding up the quality and outcome of the procedure.
Revised version (Article 40 Consular organisation and cooperation):
1. Each Member State shall be responsible for organising the procedures relating to applications. 2. Member States shall: (a) equip their consulates and authorities responsible for issuing visas at the borders with the requisite material for the collection of biometric identifiers, as well as the offices of their honorary consuls, where they make use of them, to collect biometric identifiers in accordance with Article 42; (b) cooperate with one or more other Member States under representation arrangements or any other form of consular cooperation. 3. A Member State may also cooperate with an external service provider in accordance with Article 43. 4. Member States shall notify to the Commission their consular organisation and cooperation in each consular location. 5. In the event of termination of cooperation with other Member States, Member States shall strive to assure the continuity of full service.
Article 41 Cooperation between Member States
1. Where ‘co-location’ is chosen, staff of the consulates of one or more Member States shall carry out the procedures relating to applications (including the collection of biometric identifiers) addressed to them at the consulate of another Member State and share the equipment of that Member State. The Member States concerned shall agree on the duration of and conditions for the termination of the co-location as well as the proportion of the visa fee to be received by the Member State whose consulate is being used. 2. Where ‘Common Application Centres’ are established, staff of the consulates of two or more Member States shall be pooled in one building in order for applicants to lodge applications (including biometric identifiers). Applicants shall be directed to the Member State competent for examining and deciding on the application. Member States shall agree on the duration of and conditions for the termination of such cooperation as well as the cost-sharing among the participating Member States. One Member State shall be responsible for contracts in relation to logistics and diplomatic relations with the host country. 3. In the event of termination of cooperation with other Member States, Member States shall assure the continuity of full service.
Amendment rationale: CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL Reasons for and objectives of the proposal The Visa Code is a core element of the common visa policy: it establishes harmonised procedures and conditions for processing visa applications and issuing visas. It entered into force on 5 April 2010, with the overarching objectives of facilitating legitimate travel and tackling irregular immigration, enhancing transparency and legal certainty, strengthening procedural guarantees and reinforcing equal treatment of visa applicants. The Visa Code required the Commission to submit to the European Parliament and the Council an evaluation of its implementation two years after all the provisions of the Regulation had become applicable. It presented its evaluation in a report 1 and accompanying staff working document 2 on 1 April 2014. On the basis of this evaluation, on the same date the Commission adopted a proposal 3 for a recast of the Visa Code with the aim of enhancing travel to the EU through visa policy facilitations (thereby to contributing to tourism, trade, growth and employment in the EU) and to harmonising implementation of the common rules. However, due to divergences in the positions of the European Parliament and the Council, negotiations have not progressed. Meanwhile, greater security and migratory challenges have made it clear that the approach followed in 2014 no longer matches reality. T hese factors prompte d the Commission to announce the withdrawal of its recast proposal in the Commission Work programme for 2018 4 . The formal withdrawal will take place in April 2018. While migration- and security-related objectives have become increasingly important, one should not lose sight of the fact that the vast majority of visa applicants pose no security and/or migratory risk to the EU and are bringing significant benefits to the EU. Therefore, this proposal focuses on streamlining and improving operational aspects of the visa procedure and takes account of the results of negotiations on the Visa Code recast proposal. New elements have been added which were advanced in the Commission's September 2017 Communication on the Delivery of the European Agenda on Migration 5 and in its consultations, such as the need for sufficient financial resources to support Member States' visa processing, clear rules on the issuing of multiple entry visas with a long period of validity and the leverage role that visa policy can exert in the EU's readmission policy. The Commission’s proposal for the reform of the Visa Information System legal framework (to be presented in spring 2018) will further enhance the security and efficiency of the visa procedure, in particular by taking account of technological developments and harnessing them to the benefit of Member States' authorities and bona fide applicants, closing information gaps in some areas, enhancing checks on persons and speeding up the quality and outcome of the procedure.
Article 42 Recourse to honorary consuls
1. Honorary consuls may also be authorised to perform some or all of the tasks referred to in Article 43(6). Adequate measures shall be taken to ensure security and data protection. 2. Where the honorary consul is not a civil servant of a Member State, the performance of those tasks shall comply with the requirements set out in Annex X, except for the provisions in point D(c) of that Annex. 3. Where the honorary consul is a civil servant of a Member State, the Member State concerned shall ensure that requirements comparable to those which would apply if the tasks were performed by its consulate are applied.