Table: ranked lists of chilean regions
[['region', 'public network', 'own / community generator', 'solar panel', 'other source', 'none'], ['arica and parinacota', '98.2%', '0.8%', '0.1%', '0.5%', '0.5%'], ['tarapacá', '98.5%', '0.9%', '0.0%', '0.1%', '0.4%'], ['antofagasta', '98.3%', '0.6%', '0.0%', '0.1%', '0.9%'], ['atacama', '98.0%', '0.9%', '0.3%', '0.1%', '0.7%'], ['coquimbo', '98.7%', '0.1%', '0.5%', '0.1%', '0.5%'], ['valparaíso', '99.1%', '0.0%', '0.0%', '0.7%', '0.1%'], ['santiago', '99.9%', '0.0%', '0.0%', '0.1%', '0.0%'], ["o'higgins", '99.4%', '0.1%', '0.0%', '0.2%', '0.3%'], ['maule', '99.3%', '0.1%', '0.0%', '0.1%', '0.5%'], ['biobío', '99.3%', '0.1%', '0.0%', '0.3%', '0.4%'], ['araucanía', '98.2%', '0.2%', '0.0%', '0.4%', '1.2%'], ['los ríos', '99.1%', '0.1%', '0.0%', '0.1%', '0.7%'], ['los lagos', '97.6%', '1.3%', '0.0%', '0.4%', '0.6%'], ['aisén', '98.5%', '0.4%', '0.1%', '0.2%', '0.8%'], ['magallanes', '99.5%', '0.3%', '0.0%', '0.1%', '0.1%']]
Statement: Tarapacá had a higher Public Network than Antofagasta
Statement: antofagastahad a higher Public Network than Atacama
Statement: Atacama had a lower Public Network than Coquimbo
Statement: Coquimbo had a lower Public Network than Valparaíso
Statement: Valparaíso had a lower Public Network than Santiago