Table: official test failures of the 2008 chinese milk scandal
[['producer', 'product', 'samples taken', 'samples failed', 'melamine content (mg / kg)'], ['shijiazhuang sanlu group', '三鹿牌嬰幼兒配方乳粉', '11', '11', '2563'], ['shanghai panda dairy', '熊貓可寶牌嬰幼兒配方乳粉', '5', '3', '619'], ['qingdao shengyuan dairy', '聖元牌嬰幼兒配方乳粉', '17', '8', '150'], ['shanxi gu cheng dairy', '古城牌嬰幼兒配方乳粉', '13', '4', '141.6'], ['jiangxi guangming yingxiong dairy', '英雄牌嬰幼兒配方乳粉', '2', '2', '98.6'], ['baoji huimin dairy', '惠民牌嬰幼兒配方乳粉', '1', '1', '79.17'], ['inner mongolia mengniu dairy', '蒙牛牌嬰幼兒配方乳粉', '28', '3', '68.2'], ['torador dairy industry (tianjin)', '可淇牌嬰幼兒配方乳粉', '1', '1', '67.94'], ['guangdong yashili group', '雅士利牌嬰幼兒配方乳粉', '30', '8', '53.4'], ['hunan peiyi dairy', '南山倍益牌嬰幼兒配方乳粉', '3', '1', '53.4'], ['heilongjiang qilin dairy', '嬰幼兒配方乳粉2段基粉', '1', '1', '31.74'], ['shanxi yashili dairy', '雅士利牌嬰幼兒配方乳粉', '4', '2', '26.3'], ['shenzhen jinbishi milk', '金必氏牌嬰幼兒配方乳粉', '2', '2', '18'], ['scient (guangzhou) infant nutrition', '施恩牌嬰幼兒配方乳粉', '20', '14', '17'], ['guangzhou jinding dairy products factory', '金鼎牌嬰幼兒配方乳粉', '3', '1', '16.2'], ['inner mongolia yili industrial group', '伊利牌兒童配方乳粉', '35', '1', '12'], ['yantai ausmeadow nutriment', '澳美多牌嬰幼兒配方乳粉', '16', '6', '10.7'], ['qingdao suncare nutritional technology', '愛可丁牌嬰幼兒配方乳粉', '3', '1', '4.8'], ["xi'an baiyue dairy", '御寶牌嬰幼兒配方乳粉', '3', '1', '3.73'], ['yantai leilei dairy', '磊磊牌嬰幼兒配方乳粉', '3', '3', '1.2'], ['shanghai baoanli dairy', '寶安力牌嬰幼兒配方乳粉', '1', '1', '0.21']]
Statement: Scient (guangzhou) Infant Nutrition had the most Sample fail
Statement: no Producer had 0 Sample fail
Statement: Yantai Leilei Dairy had more Sample fail than Xi'an Baiyue Dairy
Statement: Shijiazhuang Sanlu Group has the most Melamine Content (mg / Kg) content
Statement: every Producer than only had 1 Sample take had that Sample fail