734-010-0320 Scoring Ranges and Corrective Actions (1) There are three performance levels. The CPM will score each of the five evaluation categories as well as an overall evaluation score in one of the three performance levels. The contractor’s authorized representative may request a Review meeting with the CPM within 14 days of verifiable receipt of the evaluation to discuss the evaluation score with the CPM. (2) The following describes each performance level by identifying the scoring matrix for remedial actions and consequences depending on the cumulative number of occurrences during a 36-month period on all evaluations on all contracts. (a) For all performance levels, scores are assessed on a per category basis, as well as a project total. (b) Occurrences are considered on a per category basis, as well as the project total. [Table not included. See ED. NOTE.] (4) The options available to the contractor at Performance Levels 2 and 3 are: (a) Sign and return the evaluation to the CPM. (b) Request a Review meeting with the CPM to discuss the evaluation score within 14 days of verifiable receipt. Following the Review meeting with the CPM, sign and return the evaluation to the CPM. (c) Request an Appeal meeting with the CAE within 7 days from CPM Review meeting, to appeal the CPM’s evaluation score. (5) The CAE will schedule a meeting with the contractor within 14 days of receiving the contractor’s request to appeal the score. Following the Appeal meeting, the CAE may uphold the CPM’s evaluation score or adjust the score. The CAE’s decision shall be made within 14 days of the Appeal meeting and the score is considered the final score. (a) The contractor may choose to sign the evaluation form following the appeal to the CAE. Should the contractor choose not to sign the evaluation within 14 days of the appeal decision, the score becomes final without the contractor’s signature. (b) Following the Appeal meeting, the CAE will send the final evaluation/score by verifiable receipt to the authorized contractor representative indicating the date the score became final. (6) The following table identifies the actions required for a final score under Performance Level 2 depending on the number of the occurrences in Level 2. Occurrences are considered on a per category basis, on a project total, and on the cumulative number of occurrences in Level 2 during the prior 36 month period on all evaluations on all contract. [Table not included. See ED. NOTE.] (7) If the final evaluation score warrants any prequalification suspension, the contractor may appeal the suspension to DAS under OAR 734-010-0380. (8) The following table identifies the actions required for a final score under Performance Level 3 depending on the number of the occurrences in Level 3. Occurrences are considered on a per category basis, on a project total, and on the cumulative number of occurrences in Level 3 during the prior 36 month period on all evaluations an all contracts. [Table not included. See ED. NOTE.] (9) If the evaluation identifies that the contract was terminated for default, there is an automatic prequalification suspension for 6 months. (10) If the final evaluation score warrants any prequalification suspension the contractor may appeal the suspension to DAS under OAR 734-010-0380. [ED. NOTE: Tables referenced are available from the agency.] [ED. NOTE: To view attachments referenced in rule text, click here to view rule.] Statutory/Other Authority: ORS 184.616, 184.619, 279A.050, 279A.065 & 279C.430 Statutes/Other Implemented: ORS 279C.430 History: HWD 3-2016, f. & cert. ef. 11-28-16 HWD 12-2012, f. & cert. ef. 11-21-12 HWD 1-2005, f. 2-16-05, cert. ef. 3-1-05