471-070-8020 Appeals: Contested Case Proceedings Interpretation for Individuals with a Disability (1) For purposes of this rule: (a) An “assistive communication device” means any equipment designed to facilitate communication by an individual with a disability; (b) An “individual with a disability” means a person who cannot readily understand the proceedings because of deafness or a physical hearing impairment, or cannot communicate in the proceedings because of a physical speaking impairment; (c) A “qualified interpreter” for an individual with a disability means a person readily able to communicate with the individual with a disability, interpret the proceedings and accurately repeat and interpret the statements of the individual with a disability. (2) If an individual with a disability is a party or witness in a contested case proceeding: (a) The administrative law judge shall appoint a qualified interpreter and make available appropriate assistive communication devices whenever it is necessary to interpret the proceedings to, or to interpret the testimony of, the individual with a disability for that person’s contested case proceeding. (b) A fee may not be charged to the individual with a disability for the appointment of an interpreter or use of an assistive communication device. A fee may not be charged to any person for the appointment of an interpreter or the use of an assistive communication device if appointment or use is made to determine whether the individual is an individual with a disability for purposes of this rule. (3) When an interpreter for an individual with a disability is appointed or an assistive communication device is made available under this rule: (a) The administrative law judge shall appoint a qualified interpreter who is certified under ORS 45.291 if one is available unless, upon request of a party or witness, the administrative law judge deems it appropriate to appoint a qualified interpreter who is not so certified. (b) The administrative law judge may not appoint any person as an interpreter if the person has a conflict of interest with any of the parties or witnesses, is unable to understand or cannot be understood by the administrative law judge, party or witness, or is unable to work cooperatively with the administrative law judge, the person in need of an interpreter or the representative for that person. If a party or witness is dissatisfied with the interpreter selected by administrative law judge, a substitute interpreter may be used as provided in ORS 45.275 (4). (c) If a party or witness is dissatisfied with the interpreter selected by the administrative law judge, the party or witness may use any qualified interpreter except that good cause must be shown for a substitution if the substitution will delay the proceeding. Good cause exists when information in the record establishes that the party or witness would be unable to effectively communicate without the assistance of a substitute interpreter. Any party may object to use of any interpreter for good cause. (d) Fair compensation for the services of an interpreter or the cost of an assistive communication device shall be paid by the department except, when a substitute interpreter is used for reasons other than good cause, the party requesting the substitute shall bear any additional costs beyond the amount that was or would have been paid to the original interpreter. (4) The administrative law judge shall require any interpreter for an individual with a disability to state the interpreter’s name on the record and whether they are certified under ORS 45.291. If the interpreter is not certified under ORS 45.291, the interpreter must state or submit their qualifications on the record and must affirm that they will make a true and impartial interpretation of the proceedings in an understandable manner using the interpreter’s best skills and judgment in accordance with the standards and ethics of the interpreter profession. (5) A person requesting an interpreter or assistive communication device for an individual with a disability must notify the administrative law judge as soon as possible, but no later than 14 calendar days before the proceeding, including the hearing or pre-hearing conference, for which the interpreter or device is requested. (a) For good cause, the administrative law judge may waive the 14 calendar days advance notice. (b) The notice to the administrative law judge must include: (A) The name of the person needing a qualified interpreter or assistive communication device; (B) The person’s status as a party or a witness in the proceeding; and (C) If the request is on behalf of an individual with a disability, the nature and extent of the individual’s physical hearing or speaking impairment, and the type of aural interpreter, or assistive communication device needed or preferred. (6) If the department has knowledge that an individual with a disability that is a party or witness in a contested case proceeding is in need of an interpreter or assistive communication device, the department shall provide notice of the need to the Office of Administrative Hearings (OAH). If the department does not have knowledge that an interpreter or assistive communication device is needed for a person with a disability, the person, or that person’s representative, must notify the OAH of such need in advance of the contested case proceeding for which the interpreter or assistive communication device is requested. Statutory/Other Authority: ORS 657B.340 Statutes/Other Implemented: ORS 657B.410 History: ED 7-2025, minor correction filed 03/28/2025, effective 03/28/2025 ED 15-2022, adopt filed 11/23/2022, effective 11/23/2022