julilili42/papers huggingface dataset:
Analysis of everolimus starting dose as prognostic marker in HR+ mBC patients treated with everolimus (EVE) + exemestane (EXE): Results of the 3rd interim analysis of the non-interventional trial BRAWO.
2017-05-20

1061 Background: BRAWO is a German non-interventional study, which enrolled more than 2400 patients (pts) with advanced/metastatic, hormone-receptor-positive and HER2-negative breast cancer treated with EVE and EXE. Main objectives are a) the impact of physical activity on efficacy and quality of life, b) prophylaxis and management of stomatitis in clinical routine, and c) the sequence of therapy when EVE is used in daily clinical practice. Methods: In this update on the results of the 3rd interim analysis (data cut-off 18-Oct-2016) we analyzed under real world conditions the first 1.078 patients followed up until disease progression for their progression-free survival (PFS) events. A two-stage process based on a Cox regression model was used to check the relevance of the start dose on PFS. In the first step potentially relevant covariates defined by medical experts were evaluated for relevance. In the second step start dose and all covariates showing a p-value of at most 0.1 in first step including all two-interaction of start dose with these parameters were included into the model. Results: Our multivariate analysis support the evidence that predictive factors, such as body mass index (BMI, p-value: &lt; 0.001), therapeutic line (1st vs. 2nd+3rd vs. ≥4th; p-value: 0.013), presence of visceral metastases (p-value: &lt; 0.001) and ECOG (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group, p-value: &lt; 0.001) status at the beginning of the therapy correlated significantly with the PFS. 283 patients started with 5mg and 795 Patients started with 10 mg. Starting dose had no significant impact on the PFS (neither as main effect nor within interactions, p-value: 0.44-0.88). Conclusions: Even though the approved and recommended starting dose for treatment with EVE is 10 mg, physicians sometimes start EVE-treatment with a lower starting dose, trying subsequently to increase the dose to the recommended dose of 10mg to allow the patient’s organism to adapt to the therapeutic. As the study was not powered to detect possible differences in PFS by starting dose, the result of showing no detrimental effect of a lower start dose may be the result of limited power. Clinical trial information: EUPAS9462.
MOR202 with low-dose dexamethasone (Dex) and in combination with pomalidomide/dex and lenalidomide/dex in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM): Interim analysis of a phase I/IIa dose-escalation study.
2017-05-20

8024 Background: CD38 is a type II transmembrane glycoprotein expressed by MM cells. MOR202, a human IgG1 CD38 monoclonal antibody, has shown high single-agent activity in preclinical models of MM and synergy in combination with immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs), lenalidomide (LEN) and pomalidomide (POM). Methods: This interim analysis of a multicenter phase I/IIa study reports safety and efficacy data from RRMM patient (pt) cohorts treated with clinically relevant doses of MOR202 (2-hour IV infusion; 4, 8 and 16 mg/kg q1w) + Dex (≤40 mg), or at 8 or 16 mg/kg q1w with an IMiD/Dex. Primary objectives were to evaluate the safety, maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended phase II dose of MOR202. Results: As of January 2017, 79 pts had been treated, including 44 in clinically relevant cohorts: 18 received MOR202 + Dex, 15 MOR202 + LEN/Dex and 11 MOR202 + POM/Dex. Pts had received a median of 3, 2 and 3 prior treatment lines, respectively. The MTD of MOR202 was not reached. Combinations were generally well tolerated, with grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) mainly hematological; 2 pts discontinued due to a MOR202-related AE (one grade 4 thrombocytopenia; one grade 3 acute kidney failure). Infusion-related reactions (all grade 1 or 2) were seen in only 3/44 (7%) pts, and mainly occurred during the first infusion. In the MOR202 + Dex cohort, 5/17 (29%) evaluable pts (receiving at least 1 cycle of treatment) had a response, including 3 with partial responses (PRs) and 2 with very good PRs (VGPRs). Responses were also seen in 11/13 (85%, 8 PRs, 3 VGPRs) evaluable pts in the MOR202 + LEN/Dex cohort and 5/9 (56%, 2 complete responses, 3 PRs) in the MOR202 + POM/Dex cohort. Longest response duration was 17 months (MOR202/Dex). Preliminary analysis showed preservation of high CD38 levels on MM cells under MOR202 therapy. Conclusions: In heavily pretreated pts with RRMM, a 2-hour infusion of MOR202 administered at up to 16 mg/kg with Dex or in combination with an IMiD/Dex, showed a favorable safety profile, including excellent infusion tolerability. Promising preliminary efficacy and long-lasting tumor control was seen. Clinical trial information: NCT01421186.
BRCA-like classification in ovarian cancer: Results from the AGO-TR1-trial.
2017-05-20

5546 Background: BRCA associated cancers show a distinct pattern of genomic gains and losses that is associated with impaired repair of DNA double-strand breaks via homologous recombination (HR). We investigated whether BRCA1- and BRCA2-like classifiers could predict BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation status in ovarian cancer. In addition, we explored whether promoter hypermethylation or mutations in other genes involved in DNA repair associate with a BRCA-like profile in ovarian cancer. Methods: The AGO-TR1 cohort study (NCT02222883 ) enrolled 525 consecutive patients with primary (PR) and platinum sensitive relapsed (RE) ovarian cancer to perform paired mutational analysis of germline and tumor tissue. We performed mutation panel sequencing, BRCA1 promoter hypermethylation and low-coverage whole genome sequencing to classify samples as BRCA1-like or BRCA2-like in 298 ovarian cancer samples (PR: n = 159, RE: n = 139). Results: A BRCA-like profile was observed in 58.1% of the samples without germline or somatic mutation in BRCA1/2 (n = 179; BRCA1-like: n = 26, BRCA2-like: n = 23, BRCA1- and 2-like: n = 55). There was no significant difference between PR- and RE-cases (54.5% vs 61.3%). 64 of 70 BRCA1 germline mutation carriers could be identified by the BRCA1-like classifier (sensitivity: 0.91). The BRCA2-like classifier identified BRCA2 germline mutation carrier with a sensitivity of 0.71 (17 of 24). The complementary use of both classifiers led to the detection of 22 of 25 somatic mutations in BRCA1 (16/16) or - 2 (6/9). Remarkably, 12 of 13 tumor samples from germline RAD51C mutation carriers were recognized by the BRCA1-like classifier (sensitivity: 0.92). No correlation of PALB2 mutation status (n = 7) with BRCA-like profile was observed. Of 28 tumor samples with a BRCA1 promoter hypermethylation 26 had a BRCA1-like profile (sensitivity: 0.93). Conclusions: A high number of ovarian cancer cases display a BRCA-like profile. Mutations (germline and somatic) in BRCA1, BRCA2, RAD51C as well as BRCA1 hypermethylation strongly associate with a BRCA-like profile and can explain 146 of 212 cases. Future studies will investigate whether the classifiers identify patients who benefit from HR-deficiency directed approaches beyond the BRCA mutation status. Clinical trial information: NCT02222883.
Evaluation of the Melanoma Tumor Burden Score (MTBS) in a real-world setting.
2017-05-20

9565 Background: Clinical cancer registration is increasingly important for healthcare delivery and outcome research in oncology. As compared to clinical trial data, information from clinical routine is often limited regarding the granularity and quality of measures for individual tumor load and distribution. Methods: In an effort to implement a robust and useful measure of tumor burden for patients with metastatic melanoma in a German national skin cancer registry (ADOReg) we evaluated the melanoma tumor burden score (MTBS), originally developed for analyzing chemotherapy data in melanoma patients. The MTBS contains a simple categorization of size, number an distribution of metastatic lesions in individual patients. It is aimed at being used on routine radiologic report allowing for a certain level of uncertainty and imprecise quantification of metastatic lesions. Basically, the lesions are categorized per affected organ with respect to number (solitary, few, multiple) and size (≤1cm, &gt;1- 5cm, &gt;5cm). For evaluation of prognostic significance the summary score was calculated and included in univariate and multivariate survival analysis. We performed extensive sensitivity analyses for a variety of different model settings. Results: In the primary analysis set we re-evaluated 898 radiologic reports in a total of 235 various chemotherapies in n=128 stage IV melanoma patients. The confirmatory data sets consisted of n=384 stage IV melanoma patients with various treatments including chemotherapy, BRAF inhibitor treatment, and immune checkpoint blockade. MTBS categorization could be applied on routine radiologic reports in the majority of cases (95.7 %). In a multivariate model MTBS remained significantly correlated with outcome when adjusted for age, sex, LDH, and number of metastatic sites. Moreover, change in MTBS correlated to a formal response evaluation according to RECIST. Conclusions: The MTBS appears to be a promising tool for meaninful quantification of metastatic tumor load in metastatic melanoma for real life data collection like in clinical cancer registries. [Table: see text]
Association of molecular subtype, proliferation, and immune genes with efficacy of carboplatin versus gemcitabine addition to taxane-based, anthracycline-free neoadjuvant chemotherapy in early triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC): Results of the randomized WSG ADAPT-TN trial.
2017-05-20

573 Background: In the ADAPT-TN neoadjuvant trial, 12-week nab-paclitaxel (nab- pac)+carboplatin (carbo) was highly effective and superior to nab-pac+gemcitabine (gem). However, within TNBC, reliable predictive markers for carbo use have yet to be identified. Methods: Patients with early TNBC (centrally confirmed) were treated by nab-pac 125 mg/m2 with either carbo AUC2 or gem 1000 mg/m2 d 1,8 q21 given for 4 cycles. Genomic data (80 genes) and Prosigna (PAM-50) scores were available in 306 pre-therapeutic samples of 331 treated patients. Fisher’s exact test was performed for pCR differences; associations of continuous measurements or scores with pCR were analyzed by the Mann-Whitney statistic. Results: pCR was 44.5% to 28.4% (p=.004) in favor of nab-pac - carbo. Specifically within the carbo- containing arm, immunological (CD8, PD1, PFDL1) genes and proliferation markers (proliferation score and ROR scores, MKI67, CDC20, NUF2, KIF2C, CENPF, EMP3, TYMS) were positively associated with pCR (p&lt;.05 for all). Specifically within the gem-arm, angiogenesis genes were negatively associated with pCR (ANGPTL4: p=.05; FGFR4: p=.02; VEGFA: p=.03). In the whole collective, basal-like (83.3%) was favorable for pCR (38% vs. 20%, p=.015) compared to other subtypes (HER: 6.4%; luminal-A: 1.7%; normal: 8.7%), as was lower HER-2 score (p&lt;.001). Proliferation was positively associated with pCR: i.e., Pam50 proliferation score, ROR scores (all p&lt;.004), and higher Ki67 by central IHC (p&lt;.001) -- though not MKI67 RNA expression, despite their moderate correlation. Conclusions: In early TNBC, basal-like subtype, higher Ki67 (by IHC), and lower HER-2 score were associated with chemo-sensitivity for both neoadjuvant arms. Chemo-resistance pathways differed between the two taxane-based combinations (low proliferation and immune marker gene expression for carbo, high angiogenesis for gem). The positive predictive impact of immunological genes in the nab-pac - carbo arm could influence optimal patient selection for immune-modulative therapy. Clinical trial information: NCT01815242.
An open-label, uncontrolled, single arm phase II trial of the PI3K inhibitor buparlisib in patients with melanoma brain metastases.
2017-05-20

TPS9595 Background: The approval of effective BRAF +/- MEK inhibitors and immune checkpoint inhibitors has revolutionized the treatment of metastatic melanoma. However, available therapies appear to be less effective on cerebral than extracerebral metastases. Hyperactivation of the PI3K-AKT survival pathway is a prominent feature of melanoma brain metastases (MBM). This trial aims to determine the activity and safety of the PI3K inhibitor buparlisib in patients (pts) with MBM. Methods: The study enrolls adults suffering from MBM not eligible for neurosurgery or/and radiosurgery. Patients must have failed prior treatment with BRAF +/- MEK Inhibitors (BRAF-V600E mutated population) and anti-PD-1 or/and anti-CTLA-4 antibodies (BRAF wild-type population), respectively. Patients are treated with buparlisib 100 mg PO daily until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The Simon-Two-Step design for phase 2 studies was used to determine sample size. Assuming a response rate of 12.5% in comparison to historical 10% for chemotherapy 22 (8/14) pts would be required. If there are one or fewer responses in the first 8 pts the study would stop. Prespecified activity goal for the first stage of accrual was met; currently 11/22 pts are enrolled. Clinical trial information: NCT02452294.
The demand for psycho-oncological support in 820 melanoma patients: What are the determinants for the development of distress?
2017-05-20

9514 Background: There is limited data about the impact of melanoma on the psychological burden of patients. Despite some known predictors for distress like female gender or younger age, melanoma stages have not been found being related to distress in melanoma patients and there is no data concerning distress in melanoma patients under systemic treatment for metastases. Methods: Between July and September 2016, 820 melanoma patients at the outpatient clinic at the Department of Dermatology at the University of Tuebingen underwent psycho-oncological screening. The patients routinely completed the distress thermometer (DT), supplemented by a problem list, before consulting the physician. DT scores ≥ 5 are above-threshold, indicating the need for psycho-oncological support. We matched psycho-oncological data with tumor and patient specific data to examine tumor or patient specific influence on distress using logistic regression. Results: 406 (49.5%) men and 414 (50.5%) women were included, mean age was 62.35 years (IQR 52-75), mean time since primary diagnosis of melanoma was 54.84 months (IQR 15-76). 359 (44%) of the patients suffered from advanced melanoma (stage III n = 182, stage IV n = 177). 120 patients (14.6%) received systemic treatment for metastases: 90/120 (75%) checkpoint inhibitors, 27/120 (22.5%) targeted therapy and 3/120 (2.5%) chemotherapy. 338/820 (41.2%) of the patients met the cut-off score for distress. Significant influencing factors (p &lt; 0.05) for DT values of ≥ 5 were: female gender, younger age, melanoma stage III and IV. Interestingly we found a lower risk for values above-threshold for patients under systemic treatment, although this was not significant (p = 0.252). Conclusions: This is the first analysis to demonstrate the impact of advanced melanoma stages on DT scores above-threshold. Our study is also the first to indicate a lower risk for distress in patients under systemic treatment. This might be due to the closer contact between these patients and their physicians. Nevertheless, more than 40% of our patients needed psycho-oncological support. Departments that care for melanoma patients should therefore be fitted by a sufficient number of psycho-oncologists.
Durvalumab (DURVA) plus daratumumab (DARA) in patients (pts) with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM).
2017-05-20

TPS8054 Background: DARA, a monoclonal antibody (mAb) against CD38, is approved for RRMM. Combination treatment (Tx) with DARA + DURVA, a mAb against programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1), may enhance host anti-MM immunity and response. DARA and PD-L1 mAbs have each demonstrated clinical activity in combination with pomalidomide (POM) + low-dose dexamethasone (LoDEX) in MM. Thus, the phase 2 MEDI4736-MM-003 trial is evaluating DURVA + DARA in RRMM, and, in an exploratory analysis, the addition of POM + LoDEX to DARA + DURVA either upon progressive disease (PD) with DARA + DURVA or as up-front Tx will be assessed. Methods: ≈ 144 pts with RRMM are being enrolled. Pts with measurable MM who received ≥ 3 prior anti-MM Txs, including a protease inhibitor and an immunomodulatory agent, or are double-refractory to these 2 agents will be included. Exclusion criteria include allogeneic stem cell transplant (SCT), autologous SCT ≤ 12 weeks, and prior DARA or other CD38 antibody therapies. Primary endpoints are overall response rate (ORR) and safety. Secondary endpoints are time to response, duration of response, progression-free survival, and pharmacokinetics. The study includes a 3 + 3 safety run-in phase to confirm the tolerability of the recommended phase 2 doses (RP2Ds) of DURVA and DARA. Dose-limiting toxicities will be evaluated during the first Tx cycle. Safety and efficacy will be assessed by a Simon 2-stage design (Table). POM + LoDEX may be added to DARA + DURVA in pts who received ≥ 2 cycles of DARA + DURVA and had confirmed PD. Based on preliminary safety and efficacy, the 4-drug regimen may be explored as up-front Tx. Tx with either the 2- or 4-drug regimens will continue until PD or unacceptable toxicity. Pts treated with POM will be followed for second primary malignancies every 6 mos until the end of the trial. To date, 6 pts have enrolled in the run-in phase. Clinical trial information: NCT02807454. [Table: see text]
NGS-based multi-gene panel analysis in BRCA1/2-negative breast and ovarian cancer families.
2017-05-20

1526 Background: 24% of familial breast cancer (BC) and/or ovarian cancer (OC) cases analyzed within the framework of the German Consortium for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer (GC-HBOC) are due to pathogenic mutations in the BRCA1 or BRCA2 genes. The population-specific mutation prevalence of non- BRCA1/2 genes associated with familial BC and/or OC is largely unknown and was determined in a large German cohort. Methods: Here, we present next-generation sequencing (NGS) data established from TruRisk (GC-HBOC-designed) or TruSight cancer gene panels. A cohort of 6,507 BRCA1/2-negative index cases fulfilling the inclusion criteria of the GC-HBOC for germline testing was analyzed. Illumina sequencing platforms were used and data analysis was carried out at each individual center using different analysis pipelines. Analysis of copy number variations (CNV) was not included in the present data evaluation. Results: By focusing on 8 confirmed BC/OC risk genes ( ATM, CDH1, CHEK2, NBN, PALB2, RAD51C, RAD51D, TP53), the 6,507 cancer patients revealed 165 different deleterious variants in 378 unrelated mutation carriers (5.8%). We found a high prevalence of CHEK2 (n = 150, 2.3%), ATM (n = 89, 1.4% ), and PALB2 (n = 72, 1.1%) mutations while RAD51C (n = 21, 0.3%), TP53 (n = 16, 0.2%), NBN (n = 15, 0.2%), CDH1 (n = 10, 0.2%), and RAD51D (n = 5, 0.1%) were less frequently mutated. Conclusions: The high frequency of pathologic mutations in the genes ATM, CDH1, CHEK2, NBN, PALB2, RAD51C, RAD51D, and TP53, together accounting for almost 6% of familial BC/OC risk, highlights the importance of these genes to be included in BC/OC routine diagnostics. The relevance of these mutations in a clinical setting for early detection of breast and ovarian cancer needs to be established.
Systematic analysis of parameters predicting pathological axillary status (ypN0 vs. ypN+) in patients converting from cN+ to ycN0 through primary systemic therapy (PST).
2017-05-20

560 Background: Optimization of axillary staging in patients converting from cN+ to ycN0 through PST is needed. The aim of this analysis was to develop a nomogram predicting the probability of ypN+ after PST based on clinical/pathological parameters. Methods: Patients converting from cN+ to ycN0 through PST from a prospective study (SENTINA arm C) were included. Univariate/multivariate analyses were carried out for 14 clinical/pathological parameters to predict ypN+ using logistic regression models. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were reported. Model performance was assessed by leave-one-out cross-validation (LOOCV at .5 cut-offs) and ROC analyses. Calculations were performed using the SAS Software (Version 9.4). Results: 553 patients were assessed. Stepwise backward variable selection based on a multivariate analysis of all significant parameters resulted in a model (5M, Table, N = 369 evaluable) including ER (3.81; 2.25-6.44), multifocality (2.22; 1.26-3.92), LVI (9.16; 4.68-17.90), detection of SLN after PST (.50; .26-.95) and ycT (1.03; 1.01-1.06). In LOOCV, this model had an area under the curve of .81. Multivariate analysis of parameters available preoperatively showed an association between ypN0/ypN+, ER and ycT. Full subset selection resulted in a model (2M, N = 414) containing only ER (4.36; 2.80, 6.81) and ycT (1.04; 1.02, 1.07). Conclusions: A prediction model including parameters evaluable before/after definitive surgery resulted in a nomogram with acceptable accuracy. Limitation to parameters evaluable before surgery (i.e. ER, ycT) showed reduced accuracy that was comparable/superior to accuracy of using individual parameters. Since tumor biology was the strongest parameter in our models, we hypothesize that modern tumor biologic parameters such as gene expression profiling might optimize prediction of axillary status after PST improving patient counseling. [Table: see text]
Median progression free survival (PFS) for patients treated with everolimus (EVE) + exemestane (EXE) for HR+ mBC in routine clinical practice: Results of the 3rd interim analysis of the non-interventional trial BRAWO.
2017-05-20

e12547 Background: BRAWO is a non-interventional study, which enrolled more than 2400 patients (pts) with advanced/metastatic, hormone-receptor-positive and HER2-negative breast cancer treated with EVE and EXE. Main objectives are a) the impact of physical activity on efficacy and quality of life, b) prophylaxis and management of stomatitis in clinical routine, and c) the sequence of therapy when EVE is used in daily clinical practice. We report updated data of the 3 rd interim analysis, including PFS. Methods: This updated analysis (data cut-off 18 Oct 2016) covers data of the first 1345 documented pts with at least one follow up under therapy. Here we describe the baseline characteristics, safety and PFS as well as response rates. PFS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier estimator. Results: At the time point of this data cut-off 1289 pts (93.9%) had discontinued the documentation. The median time for pts since primary diagnosis was 7.1 yrs and 2.2 yrs, since first sign of relapse (local recurrence or metastases). At baseline, 54.1% presented with visceral metastases. 49.2% had an ECOG performance status of 0 and 74.8% of pts started with 10mg EVE, while 24.5% started with 5mg EVE. According to treatment lines we found 27% 1L (359 pts), 32% 2L (426 pts), 19% 3L (253 pts), 11% 4L (153 pts) and 11% 5L (154 pts) in our cohort Additional baseline and safety data will be presented. The Kaplan Meier estimate of the overall PFS is 6.9 months (95%CI 6.3-7.4). 2.2% (18 pts) of the pts experienced a complete and 17.8% (147 pts) a partial remission, while 57.4% (475 pts) remained stable as their best overall responses during the documentation period. 52.3% (718 pts) discontinued the treatment due to a progressive disease and 25.5% (350 pts) due to adverse events. 67.1% (902 pts) continued the antineoplastic treatment with a subsequent therapy. Conclusions: Here we report the PFS of pts treated with EVE + EXE in a real world scenario. The PFS of 6.9 months observed in our series matches somewhat perfect with the PFS of 7.8 months from the randomized Bolero-2 trial suggesting that these findings might be valid and useful for everyday routine. Clinical trial information: EUPAS9462.