Order, subs. 32 (1), pars. 3 to 10
35. (1) If the Tribunal determines that a landlord, a superintendent or an agent of a landlord has done one or more of the activities set out in paragraphs 3 to 10 of subsection 32 (1), the Tribunal may, (a) order that the landlord, superintendent or agent may not engage in any further activities listed in those paragraphs against any of the tenants in the residential complex; (a.1) order that the landlord, superintendent or agent pay a specified sum to the tenant as compensation for, (i) the costs that the tenant has incurred or will incur in repairing or replacing property of the tenant that was damaged, destroyed or disposed of as a result of the landlord, superintendent or agent having engaged in one or more of the activities listed in those paragraphs, and (ii) other reasonable out-of-pocket expenses that the tenant has incurred or will incur as a result of the landlord, superintendent or agent having engaged in one or more of the activities listed in those paragraphs; (b) order an abatement of rent; (c) order that the landlord pay to the Tribunal an administrative fine not exceeding the greater of $10,000 or the monetary jurisdiction of the Small Claims Court in the area where the residential complex is located; (d) order that the tenancy be terminated; (e) make any other order that it considers appropriate. 1997, c. 24, s. 35 (1); 2000, c. 26, Sched. K, s. 6 (7). Same (2) If in an application under any of paragraphs 3 to 10 of subsection 32 (1) it is determined that the tenant was induced by the conduct of the landlord, the superintendent or an agent of the landlord to vacate the rental unit, the Tribunal may, in addition to the remedies set out in subsection (1), order that the landlord pay a specified sum to the tenant as compensation for, (a) all or any portion of any increased rent which the tenant has incurred or will incur for a one-year period after the tenant has left the rental unit; and (b) reasonable out of pocket moving, storage and other like expenses which the tenant has incurred or will incur. 1997, c. 24, s. 35 (2). Order, subs. 32 (1), par. 4 (3) If the Tribunal determines, in an application under paragraph 4 of subsection 32 (1), that the landlord, superintendent or agent of the landlord has altered the locking system on a door giving entry to the rental unit or the residential complex, or caused the locking system to be altered, during the tenant’s occupancy of the rental unit without giving the tenant replacement keys, and if the Tribunal is satisfied that the rental unit is vacant, the Tribunal may, in addition to the remedies set out in subsections (1) and (2), order that the landlord allow the tenant to recover possession of the rental unit and that the landlord refrain from renting the unit to anyone else. 2000, c. 26, Sched. K, s. 6 (8). Effect of order allowing tenant possession (4) An order under subsection (3) shall have the same effect, and shall be enforced in the same manner, as a writ of possession. 2000, c. 26, Sched. K, s. 6 (8). Expiry of order allowing tenant possession (5) An order under subsection (3) expires, (a) at the end of the 15th day after the day it is issued if it is not filed within those 15 days with the sheriff who has territorial jurisdiction where the rental unit is located; or (b) at the end of the 45th day after the day it is issued if it is filed in the manner described in clause (a). 2000, c. 26, Sched. K, s. 6 (8).