30. (1) An officer or a manager employed in a correctional institution who believes an inmate has committed a misconduct shall consider whether to deal with the alleged misconduct by way of the alternative resolution process set out in this section. O. Reg. 574/21, s. 13. (2) In order to use the alternative resolution process to deal with the matter, (a) the officer or manager must determine that the alternative resolution process is appropriate after considering the factors set out in subsection (4); and (b) the inmate must, (i) agree that they committed a misconduct, (ii) consent to the use of the alternative resolution process, and (iii) consent to and comply with the proposed measure. O. Reg. 574/21, s. 13. (3) The alleged misconduct shall be referred to the Superintendent to be dealt with under section 31 or 32 if the requirements in subsection (2) of this section are not met. O. Reg. 574/21, s. 13. (4) In determining whether the alternative resolution process is appropriate and in determining what type of measure would be proportionate and reasonable under this section, the officer or manager shall consider the following factors: 1. The inmate’s degree of awareness that they have committed a misconduct. 2. The degree of intentionality or premeditation in the inmate’s actions. 3. The circumstances around the misconduct, including the degree of provocation involved. 4. The amount of harm or damage and the amount of potential harm or damage. 5. The inmate’s previous conduct. 6. Any disproportionate impacts of the potential measures on a right or entitlement of the inmate under the Human Rights Code, and any other factors related to the Human Rights Code. 7. Any other relevant factors. O. Reg. 574/21, s. 13. (5) If the inmate asks to be provided with access to the social or cultural supports described in section 7.1 to support them during the alternative resolution process, the officer or manager shall make reasonable efforts to provide the inmate with access to those supports. O. Reg. 574/21, s. 13. (6) The officer or manager shall consider and implement measures in accordance with the following rules: 1. First, the officer or manager may implement any of the following measures if they determine that the measures are proportionate and reasonable in response to the misconduct: i. Requiring the inmate to make an apology. ii. Requiring the inmate to attend counselling. iii. Requiring the inmate to attend specified programming. iv. Requiring the inmate to participate in restorative measures that mitigate or make amends for the misconduct. 2. If the officer or manager determines that the measures described in paragraph 1 are not, on their own, proportionate and reasonable in response to the misconduct, they may implement any of the following measures, alone or in combination with any other measures described in this subsection: i. Loss of all or some privileges, including the privilege of purchasing items from the institutional canteen, for a period of not more than seven days. ii. A change of program or work activity. iii. Additional work or duties. iv. A reprimand. O. Reg. 574/21, s. 13. (7) If an officer or manager deals with misconduct by way of the alternative resolution process under this section, they shall, (a) create a record setting out, (i) the details of the misconduct, (ii) how the factors in subsection (4) were considered, and (iii) what measures under subsection (6) were used, if any, and why they were used; and (b) provide the record to their supervisor. O. Reg. 574/21, s. 13. (8) The Superintendent shall provide the Minister with statistical information on the use of alternative resolution measures in the correctional institution every four months. O. Reg. 574/21, s. 13. (9) Misconduct that is dealt with by the alternative resolution process under this section shall not affect the security classification of the inmate within the Ministry’s correctional institutions. O. Reg. 574/21, s. 13.