Evidence by Cross-Examination on Affidavit
 39.02 (1) A party to a motion or application who has served every affidavit on which the party intends to rely and has completed all examinations under rule 39.03 may cross-examine the deponent of any affidavit served by a party who is adverse in interest on the motion or application.  R.R.O. 1990, Reg. 194, r. 39.02 (1). (1.1) Subrule (1) does not apply to an application made under subsection 140 (3) of the Courts of Justice Act. O. Reg. 43/14, s. 11. (2) A party who has cross-examined on an affidavit delivered by an adverse party shall not subsequently deliver an affidavit for use at the hearing or conduct an examination under rule 39.03 without leave or consent, and the court shall grant leave, on such terms as are just, where it is satisfied that the party ought to be permitted to respond to any matter raised on the cross-examination with evidence in the form of an affidavit or a transcript of an examination conducted under rule 39.03.  R.R.O. 1990, Reg. 194, r. 39.02 (2). To be Exercised with Reasonable Diligence (3) The right to cross-examine shall be exercised with reasonable diligence, and the court may refuse an adjournment of a motion or application for the purpose of cross-examination where the party seeking the adjournment has failed to act with reasonable diligence.  R.R.O. 1990, Reg. 194, r. 39.02 (3). Additional Provisions Applicable to Motions (4) On a motion other than a motion for summary judgment or a contempt order, a party who cross-examines on an affidavit, (a) shall, where the party orders a transcript of the examination, purchase and serve a copy on every adverse party on the motion, free of charge; and (b) is liable for the partial indemnity costs of every adverse party on the motion in respect of the cross-examination, regardless of the outcome of the proceeding, unless the court orders otherwise.  R.R.O. 1990, Reg. 194, r. 39.02 (4); O. Reg. 284/01, s. 10. Evidence by Examination of a Witness Before the Hearing 39.03 (1) Subject to subrule 39.02 (2), a person may be examined as a witness before the hearing of a pending motion or application for the purpose of having a transcript of his or her evidence available for use at the hearing.  R.R.O. 1990, Reg. 194, r. 39.03 (1). (2) A witness examined under subrule (1) may be cross-examined by the examining party and any other party and may then be re-examined by the examining party on matters raised by other parties, and the re-examination may take the form of cross-examination.  R.R.O. 1990, Reg. 194, r. 39.03 (2). (2.1) Subrules (1) and (2) do not apply to an application made under subsection 140 (3) of the
Courts of Justice Act. O. Reg. 43/14, s. 12. To be Exercised with Reasonable Diligence (3) The right to examine shall be exercised with reasonable diligence, and the court may refuse an adjournment of a motion or application for the purpose of an examination where the party seeking the adjournment has failed to act with reasonable diligence.  R.R.O. 1990, Reg. 194, r. 39.03 (3). At the Hearing (4) With leave of the presiding judge or officer, a person may be examined at the hearing of a motion or application in the same manner as at a trial.  R.R.O. 1990, Reg. 194, r. 39.03 (4). Summons to Witness (5) The attendance of a person to be examined under subrule (4) may be compelled in the same manner as provided in Rule 53 for a witness at a trial.  R.R.O. 1990, Reg. 194, r. 39.03 (5). Evidence by Examination for Discovery Adverse Party’s Examination 39.04 (1) On the hearing of a motion, a party may use in evidence an adverse party’s examination for discovery or the examination for discovery of any person examined on behalf or in place of, or in addition to, the adverse party, and rule 31.11 (use of discovery at trial) applies with necessary modifications.  O. Reg. 534/95, s. 1. Party’s Examination (2) On the hearing of a motion, a party may not use in evidence the party’s own examination for discovery or the examination for discovery of any person examined on behalf or in place of, or in addition to, the party unless the other parties consent.  O. Reg. 534/95, s. 1. PRESERVATION OF RIGHTS IN PENDING LITIGATION RULE 40  INTERLOCUTORY INJUNCTION OR MANDATORY ORDER