57 (1) Upon receiving a complaint made under this Act, the Commissioner may inform the person about whom the complaint is made of the nature of the complaint and, (a)  inquire as to what means, other than the complaint, that the complainant is using or has used to resolve the subject-matter of the complaint; (b)  require the complainant to try to effect a settlement, within the time period that the Commissioner specifies, with the person about which the complaint is made; or (c)  authorize a mediator to review the complaint and to try to effect a settlement, within the time period that the Commissioner specifies, between the complainant and the person about which the complaint is made.  2004, c. 3, Sched. A, s. 57 (1). Dealings without prejudice (2) If the Commissioner takes an action described in clause (1) (b) or (c) but no settlement is effected within the time period specified, (a)  none of the dealings between the parties to the attempted settlement shall prejudice the rights and duties of the parties under this Act; (b)  none of the information disclosed in the course of trying to effect a settlement shall prejudice the rights and duties of the parties under this Act; and (c)  none of the information disclosed in the course of trying to effect a settlement and that is subject to mediation privilege shall be used or disclosed outside the attempted settlement, including in a review of a complaint under this section or in an inspection under section 60, unless all parties expressly consent.  2004, c. 3, Sched. A, s. 57 (2). Commissioner’s review (3) If the Commissioner does not take an action described in clause (1) (b) or (c) or if the Commissioner takes an action described in one of those clauses but no settlement is effected within the time period specified, the Commissioner may review the subject-matter of a complaint made under this Act if satisfied that there are reasonable grounds to do so.  2004, c. 3, Sched. A, s. 57 (3). No review (4) The Commissioner may decide not to review the subject-matter of the complaint for whatever reason the Commissioner considers proper, including if satisfied that, (a)  the person about which the complaint is made has responded adequately to the complaint; (b)  the complaint has been or could be more appropriately dealt with, initially or completely, by means of a procedure, other than a complaint under this Act; (c)  the length of time that has elapsed between the date when the subject-matter of the complaint arose and the date the complaint was made is such that a review under this section would likely result in undue prejudice to any person; (d)  the complainant does not have a sufficient personal interest in the subject-matter of the complaint; or (e)  the complaint is frivolous or vexatious or is made in bad faith.  2004, c. 3, Sched. A, s. 57 (4). Notice (5) Upon deciding not to review the subject-matter of a complaint, the Commissioner shall give notice of the decision to the complainant and shall specify in the notice the reason for the decision.  2004, c. 3, Sched. A, s. 57 (5). Same (6) Upon deciding to review the subject-matter of a complaint, the Commissioner shall give notice of the decision to the person about whom the complaint is made.  2004, c. 3, Sched. A, s. 57 (6).