Review, substantial change in program
 21. (1) A panel established under section 30 of Ontario Regulation 563/21 (General) shall consider whether there is reason to believe that a permitted institution has substantially changed the character, duration or components of a program of professional education. O. Reg. 565/21, s. 5 (1). (1.1), (1.2) Revoked: O. Reg. 565/21, s. 5 (1). (1.3) If a panel referred to in subsection (1) finds that there is reason to believe that a permitted institution has substantially changed the character, duration or components of a program, the panel shall notify the Accreditation Committee and the permitted institution. O. Reg. 247/16, s. 5 (1); O. Reg. 565/21, s. 5 (2). (1.4) Following notification under subsection (1.3), the Accreditation Committee shall decide what application materials, if any, the permitted institution must provide to the Accreditation Committee in addition to the fee required under clause (1.7) (a) and the report required under clause (1.7) (b). O. Reg. 247/16, s. 5 (1). (1.5) The additional application materials required under subsection (1.4) may include any materials described in paragraphs 2 to 11 of subsection 10 (3). O. Reg. 247/16, s. 5 (1). (1.6) The Accreditation Committee shall notify the permitted institution of its decision under subsection (1.4). O. Reg. 247/16, s. 5 (1). (1.7) Following notification under subsection (1.6), the permitted institution shall, (a)  pay the application fee prescribed by the College by by-law; (b)  submit a written self-appraisal report on the program that indicates the ways in which the program continues to satisfy the requirements for accreditation under section 9; and (c)  submit any additional application materials required by the Accreditation Committee under subsection (1.4). O. Reg. 247/16, s. 5 (1). (2) On receipt of a notice under subsection (1.3), (a)  the Accreditation Committee shall conduct a review of the program with respect to the program’s fulfilment of the requirements for accreditation under this Part; or (b)  the chair of the Accreditation Committee shall direct an accreditation panel to conduct a review of the program with respect to the program’s fulfilment of the requirements for accreditation under this Part. O. Reg. 565/21, s. 5 (3). (2.1) The members of the panel that provided a notice under subsection (1.3) shall not participate in the Accreditation Committee’s activities under subsection (2) and shall not be members of the accreditation panel mentioned in subsection (2). O. Reg. 247/16, s. 5 (3). (3) On the review of the program, (a)  sections 11 and 12 apply with necessary modifications if the review is conducted by the Accreditation Committee; or (b)  sections 11 to 13 apply with necessary modifications, if the review is conducted by an accreditation panel, and the Accreditation Committee shall consider the accreditation panel’s final report and the comments of the provider of the program before issuing its decision.  O. Reg. 347/02, s. 21 (3). (4) The Accreditation Committee shall issue its decision in writing following the review of the program and shall include its reasons for the decision and the facts on which the decision is based.  O. Reg. 347/02, s. 21 (4). (5) The Accreditation Committee shall provide a copy of its decision to the Registrar and the provider of the program.  O. Reg. 347/02, s. 21 (5); S.O. 2009, c. 33, Sched. 13, s. 3 (1). (6) The Accreditation Committee may issue an order, (a)  to revoke the accreditation of a program of professional education if the Committee’s decision is that the program no longer qualifies for accreditation under this Part; or (b)  to do one or more of the following: (i)  Add conditions for the continuing accreditation of a program of professional education. (ii)  Change conditions previously imposed on the accreditation of a program of professional education. (iii)  Change the accreditation period of a program of professional education. O. Reg. 347/02, s. 21 (5); O. Reg. 247/16, s. 5 (4).