Thats not the point is it We have 100 proof that they were editting their own article adding PR and spin and now we have a 100 denial from the Chaplain who 100 speaks for the school He  is speaking for the schoolinstitute on Wikipedia and his claim has been proofed 100 false This was June 24 2007 Only a few months ago Not in 2004 or 2004 like many of the other USGOV edits IMO WHINSEC and the Chaplain are no longer to be considered RS Sorry they have been caught in the spiderweb of lies Δbutler 

    ####Prompt- Does the next message are offensives ? reply with a JSON object (without carriage return or new lines)
    with keys :
    isoffensive (True if it's offensive).
    This this the message : 
Thats not the point is it We have 100 proof that they were editting their own article adding PR and spin and now we have a 100 denial from the Chaplain who 100 speaks for the school He  is speaking for the schoolinstitute on Wikipedia and his claim has been proofed 100 false This was June 24 2007 Only a few months ago Not in 2004 or 2004 like many of the other USGOV edits IMO WHINSEC and the Chaplain are no longer to be considered RS Sorry they have been caught in the spiderweb of lies Δbutler 

