 notability and sourcing Dear 74thank you for your answer I really appreciate the way you propose to communicate as it gives more comfort for both of us and builds dialog and consensusThank you for your suggestions on how to improve this article I agree with them but I think I should first follow Fiddle Faddles suggestion that the first task is to show and prove notability thoughI fully understand and agree with wikipedia rules  thanks to which the quality of articles is high and I want to follow that This is why I prepared it took a lot of my time  believe me a detailed info proving notability and the fact that I mostly use secondary sources Its available here  WikipediaArticles for deletionSORCER Unfortunately till now from those who have doubts on notability and sources  there was no single comment showing directly what in their opinion is not enough within presented provesSo as I appreciate our way of communication I would like to ask you for your opinion about the proves of notability and sourcing which I have provided here WikipediaArticles for deletionSORCER I encourage you to read all of it but if you would like to focus on proves only  they are listed with following datessignaturesPawelpacewicz talk Pawelpacewicz talk Additionally in WikipediaArticles for deletionSORCER you can find opinions of 2 members who are specializing in computingUserScope creep who is member of WikiProject Computer science He reviewed one of sources and confirmed its secondary sourceUserW Nowicki who is member of WikiProject Computing  gave keep voteI hope You find them useful  

    ####Prompt- Does the next message are offensives ? reply with a JSON object (without carriage return or new lines)
    with keys :
    isoffensive (True if it's offensive).
    This this the message : 
 notability and sourcing Dear 74thank you for your answer I really appreciate the way you propose to communicate as it gives more comfort for both of us and builds dialog and consensusThank you for your suggestions on how to improve this article I agree with them but I think I should first follow Fiddle Faddles suggestion that the first task is to show and prove notability thoughI fully understand and agree with wikipedia rules  thanks to which the quality of articles is high and I want to follow that This is why I prepared it took a lot of my time  believe me a detailed info proving notability and the fact that I mostly use secondary sources Its available here  WikipediaArticles for deletionSORCER Unfortunately till now from those who have doubts on notability and sources  there was no single comment showing directly what in their opinion is not enough within presented provesSo as I appreciate our way of communication I would like to ask you for your opinion about the proves of notability and sourcing which I have provided here WikipediaArticles for deletionSORCER I encourage you to read all of it but if you would like to focus on proves only  they are listed with following datessignaturesPawelpacewicz talk Pawelpacewicz talk Additionally in WikipediaArticles for deletionSORCER you can find opinions of 2 members who are specializing in computingUserScope creep who is member of WikiProject Computer science He reviewed one of sources and confirmed its secondary sourceUserW Nowicki who is member of WikiProject Computing  gave keep voteI hope You find them useful  

