Yes England and Wales has something like it but NIED wouldnt be what we call it Im not happy with some of the POV titles in the wikipedia law which is mostly US law with notes which is why I am reluctant to contribute further to articles like Tort Essentially they mislead more than they inform by trying to set out one jurisdiction the US but with suitable weasel words to try to make it more universal The result informs noone properly For the record we have specific rules about psychiatric injury but also permit recovery for emotional distress in narrower circumstances under the tort of negligence

    ####Prompt- Does the next message are offensives ? reply with a JSON object (without carriage return or new lines)
    with keys :
    isoffensive (True if it's offensive).
    This this the message : 
Yes England and Wales has something like it but NIED wouldnt be what we call it Im not happy with some of the POV titles in the wikipedia law which is mostly US law with notes which is why I am reluctant to contribute further to articles like Tort Essentially they mislead more than they inform by trying to set out one jurisdiction the US but with suitable weasel words to try to make it more universal The result informs noone properly For the record we have specific rules about psychiatric injury but also permit recovery for emotional distress in narrower circumstances under the tort of negligence

