Alternate Kanji   先聖 also translates to Sensei but literally means anicent sage or Confucius  It translates to sensei Its pronounced that way but it translates into English at any rate as ancient sage and usually refers to Confucius But it has absolutely nothing to do with the word covered by this article and the kanji are not alternates for 先生 The coincidence of pronunciation is just that a coincidence Nothing more nothing less   Im only asking if the kanji I listed is a archic version of the current kanji used Plus Confucius was a teacher so it cant be said mere coincidence  Suite yourself But 先聖 is not an archaic version of 先生 and the coincidence of pronunciation is just that This is not at all a rare phenomenon in Japanese in fact it is the Chinese that you should be tracking down Whether 先聖 and 先生 are pronounced the same in Chinese I do not know In any case if you introduce into the article your assumption about the two character strings being related or variant spellings of the same word you will have to substantiate the assertion with a reliable source as per WPATT All other discussion is irrelevant to Wikipedia and does not belong here  

    ####Prompt- Does the next message are offensives ? reply with a JSON object (without carriage return or new lines)
    with keys :
    isoffensive (True if it's offensive).
    This this the message : 
Alternate Kanji   先聖 also translates to Sensei but literally means anicent sage or Confucius  It translates to sensei Its pronounced that way but it translates into English at any rate as ancient sage and usually refers to Confucius But it has absolutely nothing to do with the word covered by this article and the kanji are not alternates for 先生 The coincidence of pronunciation is just that a coincidence Nothing more nothing less   Im only asking if the kanji I listed is a archic version of the current kanji used Plus Confucius was a teacher so it cant be said mere coincidence  Suite yourself But 先聖 is not an archaic version of 先生 and the coincidence of pronunciation is just that This is not at all a rare phenomenon in Japanese in fact it is the Chinese that you should be tracking down Whether 先聖 and 先生 are pronounced the same in Chinese I do not know In any case if you introduce into the article your assumption about the two character strings being related or variant spellings of the same word you will have to substantiate the assertion with a reliable source as per WPATT All other discussion is irrelevant to Wikipedia and does not belong here  

