Please read before editingPlease add new comments to the bottom of the page  You can use the new section button above to start a new topicIn general I will respond here to comments rather than on your talk page so that the conversation isnt scatteredIf you want to know why I blocked an IP address you have to let me know what IP address you are referring toIf you want to know why I deleted an article you have to let me know what article you are referring to ArchivesJan 2010  Apr 2010May 2010  Aug 2010TOC18ethoxycoronaridineHi Edgar Could you take a look at this page It seems a little suspicious to meno references and the only google hits to the 18ethoxycoronaridine are to the wiki page and the website of the abovementioned Obiter Research some other ethoxy coronaridine derivatives are found as natural products but not the 18 Im thinking if the University of Vermont had licensed out one of their patented compounds for the development of a new drug addiction treatment medication the patents on 18methoxycoronaridine are rather broad so this probably is covered then they would have made some kind of press release about it   The compound doesnt show up in SciFinder but its not too surprising that nothing has been published yet if it was first synthesized in 2010  Its quite possible that little is known about it and it would be too early to be considered a drug addiction treatment and not yet something to put out a press release about  So the content of the article doesnt come across as inaccurate to me but it probably doesnt meet Wikipedias guidelines pertaining to notability and verifiability  My guess is that someone involved in the research created the article in a moment of vanity  It might be best to merge the article into another which already has content about various coronaridine derivatives such as 18Methoxycoronaridine  This would at least put it in context    Edgar181 Hmm fair points I was thinking about just asking the page creator for the relevant patent number so the page at least has a reference But now that I had a better look Im still more suspicious about the company they look like they are just doing a custom synthesis of an obscure material that people might want and trying to sell it for a high price 18methoxycoronaridine is not readily available from biosciences suppliers like Tocris or SigmaAldrich so researchers would probably be interested in a close analogue And if things like this are anything to go by I feel the page may be more about marketing their poor quality product they even admit it is racemic on their webshop than proclaiming their new research Id be tempted to email the University of Vermont or maybe just Dr Glick personally as no doubt he would know about whether any licensing agreement exists as claimed   Ok the relevant patent is US 6211360 issued to Stanley D Glick and Martin E Kuehne and the University of Vermont in 2001 but the patent filing was in 1996 So the 18ethoxy compound is covered by the patent but it isnt one of the examples or preferred compounds

    ####Prompt- Does the next message are offensives ? reply with a JSON object (without carriage return or new lines)
    with keys :
    isoffensive (True if it's offensive).
    This this the message : 
Please read before editingPlease add new comments to the bottom of the page  You can use the new section button above to start a new topicIn general I will respond here to comments rather than on your talk page so that the conversation isnt scatteredIf you want to know why I blocked an IP address you have to let me know what IP address you are referring toIf you want to know why I deleted an article you have to let me know what article you are referring to ArchivesJan 2010  Apr 2010May 2010  Aug 2010TOC18ethoxycoronaridineHi Edgar Could you take a look at this page It seems a little suspicious to meno references and the only google hits to the 18ethoxycoronaridine are to the wiki page and the website of the abovementioned Obiter Research some other ethoxy coronaridine derivatives are found as natural products but not the 18 Im thinking if the University of Vermont had licensed out one of their patented compounds for the development of a new drug addiction treatment medication the patents on 18methoxycoronaridine are rather broad so this probably is covered then they would have made some kind of press release about it   The compound doesnt show up in SciFinder but its not too surprising that nothing has been published yet if it was first synthesized in 2010  Its quite possible that little is known about it and it would be too early to be considered a drug addiction treatment and not yet something to put out a press release about  So the content of the article doesnt come across as inaccurate to me but it probably doesnt meet Wikipedias guidelines pertaining to notability and verifiability  My guess is that someone involved in the research created the article in a moment of vanity  It might be best to merge the article into another which already has content about various coronaridine derivatives such as 18Methoxycoronaridine  This would at least put it in context    Edgar181 Hmm fair points I was thinking about just asking the page creator for the relevant patent number so the page at least has a reference But now that I had a better look Im still more suspicious about the company they look like they are just doing a custom synthesis of an obscure material that people might want and trying to sell it for a high price 18methoxycoronaridine is not readily available from biosciences suppliers like Tocris or SigmaAldrich so researchers would probably be interested in a close analogue And if things like this are anything to go by I feel the page may be more about marketing their poor quality product they even admit it is racemic on their webshop than proclaiming their new research Id be tempted to email the University of Vermont or maybe just Dr Glick personally as no doubt he would know about whether any licensing agreement exists as claimed   Ok the relevant patent is US 6211360 issued to Stanley D Glick and Martin E Kuehne and the University of Vermont in 2001 but the patent filing was in 1996 So the 18ethoxy compound is covered by the patent but it isnt one of the examples or preferred compounds

