 Aduri I ask you that you reconsider the closure as noconsensus votewise delete is ahead but reading the votes and looking at the sources it is clear that the argument for deletion as per WPNF was stronger There was exactly one good argument to keep and it was UserSchmidts argument But even he recognized it as weak and really the sources he provided wer enot osurces of notability not existence It should have been closed as delete as it really doesnt meet the criteria for notability that applySince you closed the original AfD and it was submitted for relisting I think you should have refrained from closing the second AfD No biggie its not like I am upset or anything but I think it was not a good judgement Just something to think about  

    ####Prompt- Does the next message are offensives ? reply with a JSON object (without carriage return or new lines)
    with keys :
    isoffensive (True if it's offensive).
    This this the message : 
 Aduri I ask you that you reconsider the closure as noconsensus votewise delete is ahead but reading the votes and looking at the sources it is clear that the argument for deletion as per WPNF was stronger There was exactly one good argument to keep and it was UserSchmidts argument But even he recognized it as weak and really the sources he provided wer enot osurces of notability not existence It should have been closed as delete as it really doesnt meet the criteria for notability that applySince you closed the original AfD and it was submitted for relisting I think you should have refrained from closing the second AfD No biggie its not like I am upset or anything but I think it was not a good judgement Just something to think about  

