How would a valid criticism of actions be presented if using an adjective such as pompous is not allowed I feel like I have to point out here that namecalling is by definition ascribing a noun to an individual such as assclown doofus idiot choadlicker and on Pompous is an adjective and not a name If one thinks that certain admins are arrogant that they think themselves above the opinion of general editors would this not be an accurate description of that sentiment   

    ####Prompt- Does the next message are offensives ? reply with a JSON object (without carriage return or new lines)
    with keys :
    isoffensive (True if it's offensive).
    This this the message : 
How would a valid criticism of actions be presented if using an adjective such as pompous is not allowed I feel like I have to point out here that namecalling is by definition ascribing a noun to an individual such as assclown doofus idiot choadlicker and on Pompous is an adjective and not a name If one thinks that certain admins are arrogant that they think themselves above the opinion of general editors would this not be an accurate description of that sentiment   

