 Re 1 Im not sure what you mean by different ground They differ in their POV While Notable assassinations of the Sri Lankan Civil War is written according to WPNPOV Assassinations and murders attributed to the LTTE is functionally a WPPOV fork I say functionally because it historically preceded the other article so it hasnt been created with that intention However I feel that the decision to keep a POV version in addition to an NPOV version amounts functionally to the same as creating a POV fork That is certainly not a reason to keep the latter Re 2  3 I assume youre talking about WPSIZE There is absolutely no reason to be worried about that WPSIZE is not a policy but a guideline so it the statement itis agaisnt wikipedia policy is simply wrong The guideline says Readers may tire of reading a page much longer than about 6000 to 10000 words The article body currently has 935 words so were not even close by any stretch of the imagination  Even if we were close the guideline specifically says No need for haste Even if we were beyond the recommandation there are many other ways to split articles Splitting it by POV is not the way to do it  In conclusion I am not convinced by any of the arguments I dont see any benefit for Wikipedia if we kept the  LTTE article  Since this is not an official mediation and since the three opposing editors have not applied for WPSLR membership I have no mandate or obligation to represent them Nevertheless I want to regard their needs The fact that we see some unconvincing arguments could indicate that there are other unexpressed needs which the  LTTE article satisfies If that is the case then there could be more at stake than just a harmless redirect If that is the case then I recommend bringing it up on WPAFD   

    ####Prompt- Does the next message are offensives ? reply with a JSON object (without carriage return or new lines)
    with keys :
    isoffensive (True if it's offensive).
    This this the message : 
 Re 1 Im not sure what you mean by different ground They differ in their POV While Notable assassinations of the Sri Lankan Civil War is written according to WPNPOV Assassinations and murders attributed to the LTTE is functionally a WPPOV fork I say functionally because it historically preceded the other article so it hasnt been created with that intention However I feel that the decision to keep a POV version in addition to an NPOV version amounts functionally to the same as creating a POV fork That is certainly not a reason to keep the latter Re 2  3 I assume youre talking about WPSIZE There is absolutely no reason to be worried about that WPSIZE is not a policy but a guideline so it the statement itis agaisnt wikipedia policy is simply wrong The guideline says Readers may tire of reading a page much longer than about 6000 to 10000 words The article body currently has 935 words so were not even close by any stretch of the imagination  Even if we were close the guideline specifically says No need for haste Even if we were beyond the recommandation there are many other ways to split articles Splitting it by POV is not the way to do it  In conclusion I am not convinced by any of the arguments I dont see any benefit for Wikipedia if we kept the  LTTE article  Since this is not an official mediation and since the three opposing editors have not applied for WPSLR membership I have no mandate or obligation to represent them Nevertheless I want to regard their needs The fact that we see some unconvincing arguments could indicate that there are other unexpressed needs which the  LTTE article satisfies If that is the case then there could be more at stake than just a harmless redirect If that is the case then I recommend bringing it up on WPAFD   

