0315 UTC  20 Mar 08 Can you elaborate  Squeak in your add of the BLP you wrote tag for BLP as this article has issues Can you elaborate specifically what some of those issues are preferably without commentary in in a short concise bulleted list That way we can together address those concerns I agree that per the BLP page this could fall under its purview to a small extent My concern would be that someone in the future starts making sweeping changes read deletions based on IDONTLIKEIT with the BLP as their smokescreen justification I dont think thats your intent but at some point it could happen from another Im hoping we all can mitigate that possibility now Thanks in advance for clarifying        

    ####Prompt- Does the next message are offensives ? reply with a JSON object (without carriage return or new lines)
    with keys :
    isoffensive (True if it's offensive).
    This this the message : 
0315 UTC  20 Mar 08 Can you elaborate  Squeak in your add of the BLP you wrote tag for BLP as this article has issues Can you elaborate specifically what some of those issues are preferably without commentary in in a short concise bulleted list That way we can together address those concerns I agree that per the BLP page this could fall under its purview to a small extent My concern would be that someone in the future starts making sweeping changes read deletions based on IDONTLIKEIT with the BLP as their smokescreen justification I dont think thats your intent but at some point it could happen from another Im hoping we all can mitigate that possibility now Thanks in advance for clarifying        

