Acroterion I dont believe I need to review or post what a broad crosssection of scholars have to say on the subject  I believe a 5th or 6th grader could determine the relevance of the facts I propose to post  Plus you are imposing an impossible standard in that most scholars dont state the obvious for obvious reasons  Why should an accomplished scholar say 1  1  2 when everyone in his or her audience already knows the answer  Heres a reasoned conclusion a 5th or 6th grader could arrive at Since Fishers affiliation with the National Lawyers Guild was already public knowledge McCarthy didnt do anything wrong by mentioning Fisher was affiliated with the National Lawyers Guild at the Army hearings And Welch was wrong to denounce McCarthy for saying that  Im not proposing to say that but the conclusions are inescapable for even a 10year oldI do not doubt your good faith but your analysis and reason appear weak  No one besides you has raised that objectionAre there others that join you in raising that objection because Im not convinced anyone besides you believes thatBTW this appeared on the ArmyMcCarthy hearings site  At the time Brownell was seeking to designate the NLG as a Communist front organization and McCarthy mentioning Fishers membership violated a prehearing agreement to not raise the issue as it was still being litigated This baldfaced assertion did not have any citation raising suspicions it was just unfounded rumor  innuendo  

    ####Prompt- Does the next message are offensives ? reply with a JSON object (without carriage return or new lines)
    with keys :
    isoffensive (True if it's offensive).
    This this the message : 
Acroterion I dont believe I need to review or post what a broad crosssection of scholars have to say on the subject  I believe a 5th or 6th grader could determine the relevance of the facts I propose to post  Plus you are imposing an impossible standard in that most scholars dont state the obvious for obvious reasons  Why should an accomplished scholar say 1  1  2 when everyone in his or her audience already knows the answer  Heres a reasoned conclusion a 5th or 6th grader could arrive at Since Fishers affiliation with the National Lawyers Guild was already public knowledge McCarthy didnt do anything wrong by mentioning Fisher was affiliated with the National Lawyers Guild at the Army hearings And Welch was wrong to denounce McCarthy for saying that  Im not proposing to say that but the conclusions are inescapable for even a 10year oldI do not doubt your good faith but your analysis and reason appear weak  No one besides you has raised that objectionAre there others that join you in raising that objection because Im not convinced anyone besides you believes thatBTW this appeared on the ArmyMcCarthy hearings site  At the time Brownell was seeking to designate the NLG as a Communist front organization and McCarthy mentioning Fishers membership violated a prehearing agreement to not raise the issue as it was still being litigated This baldfaced assertion did not have any citation raising suspicions it was just unfounded rumor  innuendo  

