 8 July 2008 UTCI agree they would benefit from a common description which they all shared prior to your edits all using the term staterelated which was applied by a separate editor in the case of each article and lasting through review for at least 3 years for Temple and 4 years for the Pitt and PSU articles which speaks to WikipediaSilence and consensus  Do any of their current regular editors of these pages share the same delight in minutia and precision I dont know WikipediaWikiProject Pennsylvania State University seems rather dormant at the moment The Temple article does not have very active editing   However it is no secret that Pitt is my primary editing interest in wikipedia and Im extremely concerned in the accuracy of articles relating to Pitt and do not feel it benefits wikipedia to compromise that accuracy because of the content of other articles  However WPConsensus is central dogma of wikipedia and the Pitt article should reflect that   0321

    ####Prompt- Does the next message are offensives ? reply with a JSON object (without carriage return or new lines)
    with keys :
    isoffensive (True if it's offensive).
    This this the message : 
 8 July 2008 UTCI agree they would benefit from a common description which they all shared prior to your edits all using the term staterelated which was applied by a separate editor in the case of each article and lasting through review for at least 3 years for Temple and 4 years for the Pitt and PSU articles which speaks to WikipediaSilence and consensus  Do any of their current regular editors of these pages share the same delight in minutia and precision I dont know WikipediaWikiProject Pennsylvania State University seems rather dormant at the moment The Temple article does not have very active editing   However it is no secret that Pitt is my primary editing interest in wikipedia and Im extremely concerned in the accuracy of articles relating to Pitt and do not feel it benefits wikipedia to compromise that accuracy because of the content of other articles  However WPConsensus is central dogma of wikipedia and the Pitt article should reflect that   0321

