The criticisms are valid as long as the article acknowledges where they are coming from so people can judge validity themselves At the moment the article is overly vague imo  be clear that shes catholic be clear that the criticisers are atheist hindu cultural critic or whoever they are There is a vested interest and ignoring that has led to the objections to the article on the grounds of neutralitybias however you want to describe it

    ####Prompt- Does the next message are offensives ? reply with a JSON object (without carriage return or new lines)
    with keys :
    isoffensive (True if it's offensive).
    This this the message : 
The criticisms are valid as long as the article acknowledges where they are coming from so people can judge validity themselves At the moment the article is overly vague imo  be clear that shes catholic be clear that the criticisers are atheist hindu cultural critic or whoever they are There is a vested interest and ignoring that has led to the objections to the article on the grounds of neutralitybias however you want to describe it

