Noclador at the top of this article Sunday Adelaja its written This article has multiple issues and there are four points belowPoint 1 It seems like the article has enough verification for the information it contains now Verifications has been added and I think information without verification has been removedPoint 2 I think it has become quite neutral It looks like opinions has been removed and now its information based on different verificationsPoint 3 I dont think the article is too long its actually not long at all If more verifiable information is found I think this article could become better even if it becomes longerPoint 4 The edits by persons with conflict of interest both for and against seems to be reverted and the information left is more and more factual with verificationNoclador please look over it and see if you can remove that this article has multiple issues or at least some of these points Thank you I will also look for more verifiable information and if I find I will try to enrich this article and Im sure you and others will edit what I add to keep it as neutral as possibleHheejj talk 

    ####Prompt- Does the next message are offensives ? reply with a JSON object (without carriage return or new lines)
    with keys :
    isoffensive (True if it's offensive).
    This this the message : 
Noclador at the top of this article Sunday Adelaja its written This article has multiple issues and there are four points belowPoint 1 It seems like the article has enough verification for the information it contains now Verifications has been added and I think information without verification has been removedPoint 2 I think it has become quite neutral It looks like opinions has been removed and now its information based on different verificationsPoint 3 I dont think the article is too long its actually not long at all If more verifiable information is found I think this article could become better even if it becomes longerPoint 4 The edits by persons with conflict of interest both for and against seems to be reverted and the information left is more and more factual with verificationNoclador please look over it and see if you can remove that this article has multiple issues or at least some of these points Thank you I will also look for more verifiable information and if I find I will try to enrich this article and Im sure you and others will edit what I add to keep it as neutral as possibleHheejj talk 

