Pasted here is the section I removed  The research is commendable but would be more applicable in a section on modern criticms of slavery Even then it appears to be original research because the sources cited are not arguing against slavery on the basis of textual criticism they are arguing against authenticity of these books of the Bible Essentially this sentence is an original argument that the New Testament doesnt support slavery because certain Pauline epistles are not genuine apostolic writings  It would be better to cite this argument from a source who has actually argued Christianity doesnt support slavery because the slaverytolerant passages in the NT are not authentic69191435  However most scholars believe that these particular Pauline epistles were not actually authored by Paul page 385Udo Schnelle Apostle Paul His Life and Theology 2003 english translation published 2005Hermann Detering The Falsified Paul 1995Stephen G Wilson Luke and the Pastoral Epistles 1979Norman Perrin The New Testament An Introduction 1974W Bujard Stilanalytische Untersuchungen zum Kolosserfrief als Beitrag zur Methodik von Sprachvergleichen 1973E J Goodspeed Key to Ephesians 1956  page 6Mitton The Epistle to the Ephesians 1951 pages 245255Alfred Loisy The Origins of the New Testament 1936Percy Neale Harrison The Problem of the Pastoral Epistles 1921Ferdinand Christian Baur Paul the Apostle of Jesus Christ His Life and Works 1845also partially advocated by Desiderius Erasmus

    ####Prompt- Does the next message are offensives ? reply with a JSON object (without carriage return or new lines)
    with keys :
    isoffensive (True if it's offensive).
    This this the message : 
Pasted here is the section I removed  The research is commendable but would be more applicable in a section on modern criticms of slavery Even then it appears to be original research because the sources cited are not arguing against slavery on the basis of textual criticism they are arguing against authenticity of these books of the Bible Essentially this sentence is an original argument that the New Testament doesnt support slavery because certain Pauline epistles are not genuine apostolic writings  It would be better to cite this argument from a source who has actually argued Christianity doesnt support slavery because the slaverytolerant passages in the NT are not authentic69191435  However most scholars believe that these particular Pauline epistles were not actually authored by Paul page 385Udo Schnelle Apostle Paul His Life and Theology 2003 english translation published 2005Hermann Detering The Falsified Paul 1995Stephen G Wilson Luke and the Pastoral Epistles 1979Norman Perrin The New Testament An Introduction 1974W Bujard Stilanalytische Untersuchungen zum Kolosserfrief als Beitrag zur Methodik von Sprachvergleichen 1973E J Goodspeed Key to Ephesians 1956  page 6Mitton The Epistle to the Ephesians 1951 pages 245255Alfred Loisy The Origins of the New Testament 1936Percy Neale Harrison The Problem of the Pastoral Epistles 1921Ferdinand Christian Baur Paul the Apostle of Jesus Christ His Life and Works 1845also partially advocated by Desiderius Erasmus

