While this film can be discussed as the pop culture piece that it is the ultraminority viewpoint that the film espouses neednt be presented as science in Wikipedia From WPUNDUE If a viewpoint is held by an extremely small or vastly limited minority it does not belong in Wikipedia except perhaps in some ancillary article regardless of whether it is true or not and regardless of whether you can prove it or not If you can demonstrate that the films viewpoint is not held by such a tiny minority then this statement doesnt apply  talk I think thats right on the mark and something Ive been alluding to all along  This article is on the movie and focuses on the popculture production synopsis reviews and basically just movie rather than science or pseudoscience  The individual science articles such as water crystal work are the place to discuss the science in detail not here  This is a movie article    

    ####Prompt- Does the next message are offensives ? reply with a JSON object (without carriage return or new lines)
    with keys :
    isoffensive (True if it's offensive).
    This this the message : 
While this film can be discussed as the pop culture piece that it is the ultraminority viewpoint that the film espouses neednt be presented as science in Wikipedia From WPUNDUE If a viewpoint is held by an extremely small or vastly limited minority it does not belong in Wikipedia except perhaps in some ancillary article regardless of whether it is true or not and regardless of whether you can prove it or not If you can demonstrate that the films viewpoint is not held by such a tiny minority then this statement doesnt apply  talk I think thats right on the mark and something Ive been alluding to all along  This article is on the movie and focuses on the popculture production synopsis reviews and basically just movie rather than science or pseudoscience  The individual science articles such as water crystal work are the place to discuss the science in detail not here  This is a movie article    

