Dear Wikipedia Neutrality guardian Re Saddam Hussein entryno one has yet to answer my question why do the live palestinians deserve mention in the primary intro for a non palestinian leader but the Slaughtered Kurds of Saddams own countrymen do not You could have Written Some parts of the Arab world admired Saddam for standing up to the west Without mentioning the Palestinians just like you refuse to mention the slaughtered Kurds But you insist on mentioning the Palestinians and further conceal any remnant of opposing POV with the fascists friend the term  humanrights situation which you hope anyone can interpret as anything Are you claiming that the horrors both existed and didnt exist depending on who you ask where are all those dead kurds thenrevive them Im sure they will be glad to read in wikipedia that what was done to them was only a situation A situation is good Elain in Seinfeld has situations comes and goes They can dig up their graves and go home to watch the rerunsNever mind the bodies they will soon rot and everyone would have forgotten all about it Shhhhhhh But Only one thing as sure as the Sun existed didnt it The palestinians and their glee thats as solid as Iron who needs proof its the Palestinians AmenDo you have a paraplegic handy by any chance I want to know a rational arumgent of why it is so important and humanitarian to disguise Saddams undisputed DNA proven horrors It must be VERY important there mustbe some divine logic here beyond my rationalityOh It will upset the palestinians sure dont you think Saddams other little hobbies other than encouraging palestinians have upset at least the same number of people or largeer why do you stifle their emphasis thenEither you stifle ALL non Iraqi effects of Saddam or you mention them NEUTRALLYthat means not ONLY the palestinians Are you perhaps saying that 10000 gassed kurds and their millions of grieving relativessupporters are less important than 2 million live palestinians with no direct contact to Iraqi affairs other than a blushing glee at Saddams deedsif so how many how many nonpalestinians does it take to die till that issue becomes important enough to mention if it contrasts the palestinian POV  a million 6 million by any chance does this number mean anything to you or do you just file it in you head asHuman rights situation and how many palestinians angry that 112 would it take for you to remove all thehenceforth controversial entries on mathematics 3 palestinians 4 perhapsremember how to count women They wont like it unless you count women as 12 for menthey might cause something to your Human rights situation otherwise And this pargraphan increase in humanrights abuses notably acts of genocide against Iraqi Kurds The United States continued to view Saddam with deep suspicion however primarly due to his pursuit of weapons of mass destructiondo you have any factual references that dispute any of this supported FACTS not liberal wishful illusions   all of it is corroborated in the linksAnd thisThanks for pointing this out I suspect that it was removed because an anon is getting a kick out replacing noncontroversial matteroffact statements like the above with overtly emotive deliberately provocative onesAre you hinting that this sentenceWhile he remained a popular hero among many disaffected Arabs for standing up to the West and for his unflinching support for the Palestiniansis a NPOV what proof do you have of his support of the palestinians are therany references of this or just hearsayJust call wikipedia the Western Edition of Pravda and be done with itnever mind that the Palestinian POV is merely matter of morale and the opposing POV rests on actual crimes of war how in your humane conscience can you condone this state of affairsAnd I dont want to skewer anyone either If I wante to Skewer Saddam I would have called him a Hitler wannabe Little Stalin  the prince of evil and so forth This is skeweringMentioning FACTS is never skewering even if the palestinians dont like them

    ####Prompt- Does the next message are offensives ? reply with a JSON object (without carriage return or new lines)
    with keys :
    isoffensive (True if it's offensive).
    This this the message : 
Dear Wikipedia Neutrality guardian Re Saddam Hussein entryno one has yet to answer my question why do the live palestinians deserve mention in the primary intro for a non palestinian leader but the Slaughtered Kurds of Saddams own countrymen do not You could have Written Some parts of the Arab world admired Saddam for standing up to the west Without mentioning the Palestinians just like you refuse to mention the slaughtered Kurds But you insist on mentioning the Palestinians and further conceal any remnant of opposing POV with the fascists friend the term  humanrights situation which you hope anyone can interpret as anything Are you claiming that the horrors both existed and didnt exist depending on who you ask where are all those dead kurds thenrevive them Im sure they will be glad to read in wikipedia that what was done to them was only a situation A situation is good Elain in Seinfeld has situations comes and goes They can dig up their graves and go home to watch the rerunsNever mind the bodies they will soon rot and everyone would have forgotten all about it Shhhhhhh But Only one thing as sure as the Sun existed didnt it The palestinians and their glee thats as solid as Iron who needs proof its the Palestinians AmenDo you have a paraplegic handy by any chance I want to know a rational arumgent of why it is so important and humanitarian to disguise Saddams undisputed DNA proven horrors It must be VERY important there mustbe some divine logic here beyond my rationalityOh It will upset the palestinians sure dont you think Saddams other little hobbies other than encouraging palestinians have upset at least the same number of people or largeer why do you stifle their emphasis thenEither you stifle ALL non Iraqi effects of Saddam or you mention them NEUTRALLYthat means not ONLY the palestinians Are you perhaps saying that 10000 gassed kurds and their millions of grieving relativessupporters are less important than 2 million live palestinians with no direct contact to Iraqi affairs other than a blushing glee at Saddams deedsif so how many how many nonpalestinians does it take to die till that issue becomes important enough to mention if it contrasts the palestinian POV  a million 6 million by any chance does this number mean anything to you or do you just file it in you head asHuman rights situation and how many palestinians angry that 112 would it take for you to remove all thehenceforth controversial entries on mathematics 3 palestinians 4 perhapsremember how to count women They wont like it unless you count women as 12 for menthey might cause something to your Human rights situation otherwise And this pargraphan increase in humanrights abuses notably acts of genocide against Iraqi Kurds The United States continued to view Saddam with deep suspicion however primarly due to his pursuit of weapons of mass destructiondo you have any factual references that dispute any of this supported FACTS not liberal wishful illusions   all of it is corroborated in the linksAnd thisThanks for pointing this out I suspect that it was removed because an anon is getting a kick out replacing noncontroversial matteroffact statements like the above with overtly emotive deliberately provocative onesAre you hinting that this sentenceWhile he remained a popular hero among many disaffected Arabs for standing up to the West and for his unflinching support for the Palestiniansis a NPOV what proof do you have of his support of the palestinians are therany references of this or just hearsayJust call wikipedia the Western Edition of Pravda and be done with itnever mind that the Palestinian POV is merely matter of morale and the opposing POV rests on actual crimes of war how in your humane conscience can you condone this state of affairsAnd I dont want to skewer anyone either If I wante to Skewer Saddam I would have called him a Hitler wannabe Little Stalin  the prince of evil and so forth This is skeweringMentioning FACTS is never skewering even if the palestinians dont like them

