  I have seen the preview of the book in Amazon  It is not written in the style of a factual account  Baxter puts a lot of emotions into the characters that are her own insinuation  You might be right that I am being unfair to describe it as a fictionalized account but it is not a straight historical factual account either  Anyway the bibliography section is for a bibliography of sources that have been used in writing the article and this book clearly has not been so used  If you were to expand the article using the book as a source that would be a different matter  We could compromise and have it in a Further reading section though Spark 

    ####Prompt- Does the next message are offensives ? reply with a JSON object (without carriage return or new lines)
    with keys :
    isoffensive (True if it's offensive).
    This this the message : 
  I have seen the preview of the book in Amazon  It is not written in the style of a factual account  Baxter puts a lot of emotions into the characters that are her own insinuation  You might be right that I am being unfair to describe it as a fictionalized account but it is not a straight historical factual account either  Anyway the bibliography section is for a bibliography of sources that have been used in writing the article and this book clearly has not been so used  If you were to expand the article using the book as a source that would be a different matter  We could compromise and have it in a Further reading section though Spark 

