Whether a particular document is a reliable source depends on how that document is used in the article The Chinese paper could be used as a reliable source that a particular person reported a certain result but it shouldnt if it reports something dramatic like that the whole field changed because of that result This is why I keep asking people to focus on EDITS first rather than sources   

    ####Prompt- Does the next message are offensives ? reply with a JSON object (without carriage return or new lines)
    with keys :
    isoffensive (True if it's offensive).
    This this the message : 
Whether a particular document is a reliable source depends on how that document is used in the article The Chinese paper could be used as a reliable source that a particular person reported a certain result but it shouldnt if it reports something dramatic like that the whole field changed because of that result This is why I keep asking people to focus on EDITS first rather than sources   

