1 Ref 5 is handledit no longer exists on the SpaceX site as far as I can tell so I pulled from Archiveorg Performed lots of other citation fixes including fixing a couple of URLs that were incorrect I also agree that the forum cite should be removedif a replacement cannot be located the material needs to be excised In my opinion all the newspacewatchcom articles should be replaced since theyve gone completely paywall Ill be surprised if they survive even though Ive added archive links to all four of those cites2 Ill come back and clean up various conversion issues definitely SI before nonSI in spacerelated articles but I didnt immediately see much in the way of spelling issues Theres some formatting work to be done but doesnt seem too bad3 As for imagesthey simply dont exist at this point in time SpaceX is after all a private company and conducts their testing inhouse Im always keeping an eye out for them but I dont expect anything until this version of the rocket is used for a NASA mission However lack of media should not disqualify the article from any status even as Featured Article I recall one last year that was passed without free media Editors cannot be held responsible in situations like this4 I agree that rocket could be dropped from the title as redundant Or use something like SpaceX reusable rocket program Eh   t  c 

    ####Prompt- Does the next message are offensives ? reply with a JSON object (without carriage return or new lines)
    with keys :
    isoffensive (True if it's offensive).
    This this the message : 
1 Ref 5 is handledit no longer exists on the SpaceX site as far as I can tell so I pulled from Archiveorg Performed lots of other citation fixes including fixing a couple of URLs that were incorrect I also agree that the forum cite should be removedif a replacement cannot be located the material needs to be excised In my opinion all the newspacewatchcom articles should be replaced since theyve gone completely paywall Ill be surprised if they survive even though Ive added archive links to all four of those cites2 Ill come back and clean up various conversion issues definitely SI before nonSI in spacerelated articles but I didnt immediately see much in the way of spelling issues Theres some formatting work to be done but doesnt seem too bad3 As for imagesthey simply dont exist at this point in time SpaceX is after all a private company and conducts their testing inhouse Im always keeping an eye out for them but I dont expect anything until this version of the rocket is used for a NASA mission However lack of media should not disqualify the article from any status even as Featured Article I recall one last year that was passed without free media Editors cannot be held responsible in situations like this4 I agree that rocket could be dropped from the title as redundant Or use something like SpaceX reusable rocket program Eh   t  c 

