 feedback as requested Hey Antonin Im only too happy to help out as much as I can  having sooooo many problems elsewhere In fact completely and utterly stuck and rather despondent about it all First impressions not yet a balanced article  a lot on the controversies too little on the magazine and its background the latter I think needs clarification What was the Czech politicalcultural context and how did this produce the magazine Conservative is too vague  I think readers will benefit from being told more about Czech conservatism Then theres the magazine itself who started it and what were they doing before this editorial policy contributors transfer of ownership if any and whether or not the magazine has changed since its acquisition by the media group Put it this way certainly in the UK and probably in the US an award for growing the best cannabis plant isnt something usually associated with a conservative magazine  Ill put this page on my watchlist Ill be happy to sort out any copy issues btw Best regards   Thanks for your opinions Davey You are right the article is not balanced Im trying to use only sources independent on the magazine itself and unfortunately the sources deal mainly with controversies There is an overview of the history of Reflex in the 20th anniversary issue Ill try to expand the article with that information and answer your questions Btw Reflex is sometimes really considered as a conservative magazine could there be a little difference between the perception of the term in the professional and welldeveloped AngloAmerican journalism and the perception of still young independent Czech journalism Using of this term in the postcommunist world is quite complicated as conservatism defends traditional values and continuity and the first free postcommunist media including Reflex had to start building again to some extent they had to find the values and the interrupted tradition The provocative cannabis award could be an attempt to test the borders of freedom of speech and to come closer to independent and bold journalism This is however just my vague point of view We should probably avoid this association on English Wikipedia as this is a world grown in a completely different tradition and experience Again thanks for pointing out the problems Ill work on it   Ive attempted to expand and clarify the origins and background of the magazine as recommended   Yes Ive been hovering over your shoulder the whole time Good beefy stuff dyou reckon youre pretty much done with the content Cos I do and intend twiddling up the prose some time this weekend By the way its no big deal but are you OK with all those redlinks   Hi Davey you wont believe how happy I am seeing that you are still interested Im careful with the red links this project has still gaps in detailed covering of Czech topics All of the red linked names are notable Czech journalists See the Czech wiki articles for Jan Šibík Petr Hájek Jiří X Doležal Tomáš Feřtek Josef Klíma Jiří Pehe Tomáš Baldýnský Bohumil Pečinka Miloš Čermák Pavlína Wolfová With the red colour Im trying to point out that they should have articles also here Thank you for your help and interest ask whatever    Oh I know how that one feels It can be a strange and lonely business indeed Still here come the queries Constitution and Editorial continuity dyou know who owned it in the first place Was it a oneman show which employed Petr Hájek Or was he owner and editor Sorry to be picky here but itll matter particularly as this is living persons biog Yes the BLP issue is the main reason why I asked for your help Hájek was the owner together with Andrej Šťastný and Jiří Fleyberk He seems to be the most important one according to my sourcesOK so the sale of the magazine over the heads of the editorial board was entirely legal despite the resentment Dyou think this was seen as a matter of personal gain and freedom of action on his part vs personal responsibility

    ####Prompt- Does the next message are offensives ? reply with a JSON object (without carriage return or new lines)
    with keys :
    isoffensive (True if it's offensive).
    This this the message : 
 feedback as requested Hey Antonin Im only too happy to help out as much as I can  having sooooo many problems elsewhere In fact completely and utterly stuck and rather despondent about it all First impressions not yet a balanced article  a lot on the controversies too little on the magazine and its background the latter I think needs clarification What was the Czech politicalcultural context and how did this produce the magazine Conservative is too vague  I think readers will benefit from being told more about Czech conservatism Then theres the magazine itself who started it and what were they doing before this editorial policy contributors transfer of ownership if any and whether or not the magazine has changed since its acquisition by the media group Put it this way certainly in the UK and probably in the US an award for growing the best cannabis plant isnt something usually associated with a conservative magazine  Ill put this page on my watchlist Ill be happy to sort out any copy issues btw Best regards   Thanks for your opinions Davey You are right the article is not balanced Im trying to use only sources independent on the magazine itself and unfortunately the sources deal mainly with controversies There is an overview of the history of Reflex in the 20th anniversary issue Ill try to expand the article with that information and answer your questions Btw Reflex is sometimes really considered as a conservative magazine could there be a little difference between the perception of the term in the professional and welldeveloped AngloAmerican journalism and the perception of still young independent Czech journalism Using of this term in the postcommunist world is quite complicated as conservatism defends traditional values and continuity and the first free postcommunist media including Reflex had to start building again to some extent they had to find the values and the interrupted tradition The provocative cannabis award could be an attempt to test the borders of freedom of speech and to come closer to independent and bold journalism This is however just my vague point of view We should probably avoid this association on English Wikipedia as this is a world grown in a completely different tradition and experience Again thanks for pointing out the problems Ill work on it   Ive attempted to expand and clarify the origins and background of the magazine as recommended   Yes Ive been hovering over your shoulder the whole time Good beefy stuff dyou reckon youre pretty much done with the content Cos I do and intend twiddling up the prose some time this weekend By the way its no big deal but are you OK with all those redlinks   Hi Davey you wont believe how happy I am seeing that you are still interested Im careful with the red links this project has still gaps in detailed covering of Czech topics All of the red linked names are notable Czech journalists See the Czech wiki articles for Jan Šibík Petr Hájek Jiří X Doležal Tomáš Feřtek Josef Klíma Jiří Pehe Tomáš Baldýnský Bohumil Pečinka Miloš Čermák Pavlína Wolfová With the red colour Im trying to point out that they should have articles also here Thank you for your help and interest ask whatever    Oh I know how that one feels It can be a strange and lonely business indeed Still here come the queries Constitution and Editorial continuity dyou know who owned it in the first place Was it a oneman show which employed Petr Hájek Or was he owner and editor Sorry to be picky here but itll matter particularly as this is living persons biog Yes the BLP issue is the main reason why I asked for your help Hájek was the owner together with Andrej Šťastný and Jiří Fleyberk He seems to be the most important one according to my sourcesOK so the sale of the magazine over the heads of the editorial board was entirely legal despite the resentment Dyou think this was seen as a matter of personal gain and freedom of action on his part vs personal responsibility

