The trouble is that that version was hype too Wikipedia is not a press coverage scrapbook WPLINKFARM  I realise it was put in to peacock Ethereum for the AFD which is why it looked so artificial but the point stands that if those articles are worth including they need to actually be used as referencesI note also the heading is reception  none of it is talking about how Ethereum has been received its just a list of press clippings From eg the version before I touched it theres two statements from nonSPnotable people and one from someone notable enough to have a WP article who also happens to do amateur economics bloggingSo if a Reception section is to be of value it needs to actually be about the reception    

    ####Prompt- Does the next message are offensives ? reply with a JSON object (without carriage return or new lines)
    with keys :
    isoffensive (True if it's offensive).
    This this the message : 
The trouble is that that version was hype too Wikipedia is not a press coverage scrapbook WPLINKFARM  I realise it was put in to peacock Ethereum for the AFD which is why it looked so artificial but the point stands that if those articles are worth including they need to actually be used as referencesI note also the heading is reception  none of it is talking about how Ethereum has been received its just a list of press clippings From eg the version before I touched it theres two statements from nonSPnotable people and one from someone notable enough to have a WP article who also happens to do amateur economics bloggingSo if a Reception section is to be of value it needs to actually be about the reception    

