 older comments Wikipedia is not a repository for links Wikipedia is a place for articles to be written about various subjects Please rather than simply post many links which are useful but not primarily try to write the article yourself You can use those links as references to build your article But please focus on writing rather than building a large list of external links We can keep the links in here so we can refer to them and maybe add them to the article later  0620 Apr 18 2003 UTC External Links  Louise Brooks SocietyLouise Brooks blogInternet Movie Database  entry on Louise BrooksAll Movie Guide  entry on actressNews of LuluLouise Brooks StudiesRadioLulu  Louise Brooks themed radio stationFor advice on how to write an article take a look here WikipediaHow to start a page  Keep up the tremendous effort  0623 Apr 18 2003 UTCIm moving the links back to the newlyexpanded article   Zoe if youre the one who did the Louise Brooks editing kudos to you Its quite good  EKBK  that was me back when I wasnt registered Thanks  Verne Equinox  excellent revisions and headers well selected When I first wrote the major edit that exists today I was unregistered and unused to editing thanks for the great work   Feb 4 2006 My pleasure   Wrong date In Europe states Pandoras Box is from 1928 Filmography states its from 1929 Which one is correct The authoritative Louise Brooks Society lists it as 1929  The movie was still be filmed when Brooks turned 22 theres a picture of cast  crew celebrating it on the London attic set  Preceding unsigned comment added by 71192555    Philosophy I remember reading in one news article about this individual it was brief and cryptic concerning pessimistic aesthetics philosopher Arthur SchopenhauerThere seems an unnerving concentration on the film persona particularly with the one from Box which I do not think is the best image to dwell on given that it is one of dehumanization and objectification for varyous fetishistic obsessive types I have a strong intuition that there was infact ALLOT more to this person then what is being focused on by what appears to be a majority of her fans Is there any further detail in any of the Seven Seals concerning her philosophy ideology and maybe even politics and at best religion Given her scholarly nature I strongly doubt any real resemblance to the character of that film Seek the Forms   Tone Hi all glad to read this article  I think Louise Brooks is way cool but I have a quibble  Here  there it tends to read like a fansite ie a bit gushy instead of an encyclopedia article  Does anyone else have this impression  I think a few word changes might help  I can take a shot at it   Oh yeh I have That and the fact that there is a marked lack of any of her philosophies I see her first and foremost a scholar who wrote film reviews and seven esseys their subject is not given in this artical or even any philisophical works though they may have been very very diluted given that Shopenhauer was a major influence on her he held a nihilistic perversion of NeoPlatonism that would lead to social anarchy followed by dictatorship by the Nietzscheans I have bumped into this recently and was somewhat impressed though not satisfied with a lack of insight into her potentially more important contributions if any The secret here is I suspect most of these people are just obsessed perverts fans like you said Thanks   IdeArchos Giv

    ####Prompt- Does the next message are offensives ? reply with a JSON object (without carriage return or new lines)
    with keys :
    isoffensive (True if it's offensive).
    This this the message : 
 older comments Wikipedia is not a repository for links Wikipedia is a place for articles to be written about various subjects Please rather than simply post many links which are useful but not primarily try to write the article yourself You can use those links as references to build your article But please focus on writing rather than building a large list of external links We can keep the links in here so we can refer to them and maybe add them to the article later  0620 Apr 18 2003 UTC External Links  Louise Brooks SocietyLouise Brooks blogInternet Movie Database  entry on Louise BrooksAll Movie Guide  entry on actressNews of LuluLouise Brooks StudiesRadioLulu  Louise Brooks themed radio stationFor advice on how to write an article take a look here WikipediaHow to start a page  Keep up the tremendous effort  0623 Apr 18 2003 UTCIm moving the links back to the newlyexpanded article   Zoe if youre the one who did the Louise Brooks editing kudos to you Its quite good  EKBK  that was me back when I wasnt registered Thanks  Verne Equinox  excellent revisions and headers well selected When I first wrote the major edit that exists today I was unregistered and unused to editing thanks for the great work   Feb 4 2006 My pleasure   Wrong date In Europe states Pandoras Box is from 1928 Filmography states its from 1929 Which one is correct The authoritative Louise Brooks Society lists it as 1929  The movie was still be filmed when Brooks turned 22 theres a picture of cast  crew celebrating it on the London attic set  Preceding unsigned comment added by 71192555    Philosophy I remember reading in one news article about this individual it was brief and cryptic concerning pessimistic aesthetics philosopher Arthur SchopenhauerThere seems an unnerving concentration on the film persona particularly with the one from Box which I do not think is the best image to dwell on given that it is one of dehumanization and objectification for varyous fetishistic obsessive types I have a strong intuition that there was infact ALLOT more to this person then what is being focused on by what appears to be a majority of her fans Is there any further detail in any of the Seven Seals concerning her philosophy ideology and maybe even politics and at best religion Given her scholarly nature I strongly doubt any real resemblance to the character of that film Seek the Forms   Tone Hi all glad to read this article  I think Louise Brooks is way cool but I have a quibble  Here  there it tends to read like a fansite ie a bit gushy instead of an encyclopedia article  Does anyone else have this impression  I think a few word changes might help  I can take a shot at it   Oh yeh I have That and the fact that there is a marked lack of any of her philosophies I see her first and foremost a scholar who wrote film reviews and seven esseys their subject is not given in this artical or even any philisophical works though they may have been very very diluted given that Shopenhauer was a major influence on her he held a nihilistic perversion of NeoPlatonism that would lead to social anarchy followed by dictatorship by the Nietzscheans I have bumped into this recently and was somewhat impressed though not satisfied with a lack of insight into her potentially more important contributions if any The secret here is I suspect most of these people are just obsessed perverts fans like you said Thanks   IdeArchos Giv

