 The section Dear Michael Bednarek is only for UserMichael Bednarek Please explain why you could ignore the fact that UserMichael Bednarek couldnt have answered at all and moreover revert as if you were UserMichael Bednarek Please explain why you cannot wait and see for a whileonly 72 hours as mentioned above  Please explain why you interfered in the section for Dear Michael Bednarek Apparently your vandalism reverts have no reasonable reason as well as Bednareks because you and Bednarek have left the 1lead 2unsourced that looks like evil vandalism and cruel personal attack with baldfaced lies Please explain why you could ignore your obvious contradictionslies Please explain why you can think that disambiguation pages without necessary important lead can be helpful as an encyclopediaWP5P Please explain why you can think that disambiguation pages without necessary important lead can be written from a neutral point of viewWP5P and why you have tried to force us stop kind and quickwitted human beings with common sense It seemed that  and  are cruel Nazis or facists unfortunately  The third pillar of WP5P says Wikipedia is free content that anyone can edit use modify and distribute This means that Wikipedias are not even admins private websites and that to revert other editors distributions unreasonably is not helpful and not preferable at all Please explain why you can have been doing the contrary The forth pillar of WP5P says Editors should interact with each other in a respectful and civil manner Please explain why you can have been doing the opposite The fifth pillar of WP5P says Wikipedia does not have firm rules Please explain why you can have been saying and doing the contrary Please explain why you can ignore all of WP5P Please explain why you can delete the most important lead which explains from its original meanings The important lead that you deleted unreasonably is below Harmonic is originally an adjective relating to the combination of musical notes to create chords later becomes a noun meaning a soft high note played on a stringed instrument by not pressing the string all the way down  Please explain why you can leave the unsourced OR sentence while unfairly accusing me of unsourced OR The OR lead you have left is below usually refers to the frequency components of a timevarying signa   Please explain why you can expresslie restore though in fact you ruined the lead apparently  Please explain why you didnt edit positively at all when you are not satisfied with others edits  Please explain why you cannot think your unreasonable deletings are obviously useless and harmful vandalism against other editors and readers  If you can explain these fifteen questions at oncewithin 72 hours at the latest you have proved yourself to be the cruel personal attacker to be banned forever unfortunately    

    ####Prompt- Does the next message are offensives ? reply with a JSON object (without carriage return or new lines)
    with keys :
    isoffensive (True if it's offensive).
    This this the message : 
 The section Dear Michael Bednarek is only for UserMichael Bednarek Please explain why you could ignore the fact that UserMichael Bednarek couldnt have answered at all and moreover revert as if you were UserMichael Bednarek Please explain why you cannot wait and see for a whileonly 72 hours as mentioned above  Please explain why you interfered in the section for Dear Michael Bednarek Apparently your vandalism reverts have no reasonable reason as well as Bednareks because you and Bednarek have left the 1lead 2unsourced that looks like evil vandalism and cruel personal attack with baldfaced lies Please explain why you could ignore your obvious contradictionslies Please explain why you can think that disambiguation pages without necessary important lead can be helpful as an encyclopediaWP5P Please explain why you can think that disambiguation pages without necessary important lead can be written from a neutral point of viewWP5P and why you have tried to force us stop kind and quickwitted human beings with common sense It seemed that  and  are cruel Nazis or facists unfortunately  The third pillar of WP5P says Wikipedia is free content that anyone can edit use modify and distribute This means that Wikipedias are not even admins private websites and that to revert other editors distributions unreasonably is not helpful and not preferable at all Please explain why you can have been doing the contrary The forth pillar of WP5P says Editors should interact with each other in a respectful and civil manner Please explain why you can have been doing the opposite The fifth pillar of WP5P says Wikipedia does not have firm rules Please explain why you can have been saying and doing the contrary Please explain why you can ignore all of WP5P Please explain why you can delete the most important lead which explains from its original meanings The important lead that you deleted unreasonably is below Harmonic is originally an adjective relating to the combination of musical notes to create chords later becomes a noun meaning a soft high note played on a stringed instrument by not pressing the string all the way down  Please explain why you can leave the unsourced OR sentence while unfairly accusing me of unsourced OR The OR lead you have left is below usually refers to the frequency components of a timevarying signa   Please explain why you can expresslie restore though in fact you ruined the lead apparently  Please explain why you didnt edit positively at all when you are not satisfied with others edits  Please explain why you cannot think your unreasonable deletings are obviously useless and harmful vandalism against other editors and readers  If you can explain these fifteen questions at oncewithin 72 hours at the latest you have proved yourself to be the cruel personal attacker to be banned forever unfortunately    

