 Vandalism by 9944204232 Please stop it  Would 9944204232 stop vandalising this article  People have invested a lot of time and effort to improve this article  it doesnt help if you keep vandalising it  In future if you have something positive to add to this article please discuss it in the talk page  I have to spend hours undoing what you have just done  Citing several sources some of which are unreliable about one particular issue which has already been addressed and sourced with notable sources is one thing deleting edits with notable sources and then copying and pasting those sources to make a point is another  You wanted the article to talk about Serer Nile Valley migration  That had already been discussed several times with notable sources like Gravrand Cheikh Anta Diop etc  You also wanted the ethnonym of Serer to reflect the thesis of Diop  The article already did that with notable sources including Diop himself  If only you took the time to read the whole article you would have realised that all these had been addressed However you should also appreciate that not every scholar and certainly not the ultra traditionalist Serer who wants nothing to do with Egypt agree with Diop and in fact his thesis were rebutted by several scholars including Schuh etc  These are relevant view points which should also be taken into account in other to avoid bias  I will now respond to the sources that you have providedLink 1 Have you realised that this source is not credible contrary to all the sources cited Have you also realised that the author referred to the Kingdoms of Sine and Saloum as Wolof states  Even the least verse on Senegambian history can easily find out for themselves that the Kingdom of Sine and Kingdom of Saloum were Serer Kingdoms not Wolof never mind a supposed scholar   Further all the sources historical and archaeological evidence shows that the Senegambian stone circles were built by the Serer people See Gravrand Pangool Gamble Salmon and Njie Burke and Else and F RichardSince they were built by the Serers and evidence have shown that they are built well before the 14th century how then could the Serers have migrated into the area into the 14th century  That doesnt make sense  Now the Serers may have migrated to from the Nile Valley as implied by Henri Gravrand in La Civilisation Sereer Pangool which is one of the sources cited in the article  but as noted by Gravrand if they did came from the Nile it was more than 5 thousand years ago and certainly not the 14th century Further as demonstrated by Gamble Salmon and Njie the Serer are the oldest inhabitants of Senegambia others later moved in  This backs up archealogical source backs up Gravrand Kleine Richard  and so on  If your source was referring to the Guelwars of Kaabu coming from Kaabu to Sine in the 14th century at least I could understand that because it was at that time the Battle of Turubang 1335 occurred as stated by Sarr Becker and others  Even the Wolofs were already present long before the 14th century never mind the Serer people who have been present for thousand of years Further as substantiated in the article with credible sources which all backs up each other the Almoravid wars on Takrur due to religion Islam led to the Serers of Takrur who were finally defeated in Battle to leave Takrur and headed south  That was in the 11th century during AbuBakr IbnUmar and War Jabi  Even those Takrurien Serers came south long before the 14th century to join their other Serer relatives See DaggsLink 2  This link tells us about the meaning of Serer according to Pierret which tallies with Diop  The article had already address this point with notable sources as evident in the article  However since there are controversies regarding the meaning of the word it is relevant to address those as well  Furthermo

    ####Prompt- Does the next message are offensives ? reply with a JSON object (without carriage return or new lines)
    with keys :
    isoffensive (True if it's offensive).
    This this the message : 
 Vandalism by 9944204232 Please stop it  Would 9944204232 stop vandalising this article  People have invested a lot of time and effort to improve this article  it doesnt help if you keep vandalising it  In future if you have something positive to add to this article please discuss it in the talk page  I have to spend hours undoing what you have just done  Citing several sources some of which are unreliable about one particular issue which has already been addressed and sourced with notable sources is one thing deleting edits with notable sources and then copying and pasting those sources to make a point is another  You wanted the article to talk about Serer Nile Valley migration  That had already been discussed several times with notable sources like Gravrand Cheikh Anta Diop etc  You also wanted the ethnonym of Serer to reflect the thesis of Diop  The article already did that with notable sources including Diop himself  If only you took the time to read the whole article you would have realised that all these had been addressed However you should also appreciate that not every scholar and certainly not the ultra traditionalist Serer who wants nothing to do with Egypt agree with Diop and in fact his thesis were rebutted by several scholars including Schuh etc  These are relevant view points which should also be taken into account in other to avoid bias  I will now respond to the sources that you have providedLink 1 Have you realised that this source is not credible contrary to all the sources cited Have you also realised that the author referred to the Kingdoms of Sine and Saloum as Wolof states  Even the least verse on Senegambian history can easily find out for themselves that the Kingdom of Sine and Kingdom of Saloum were Serer Kingdoms not Wolof never mind a supposed scholar   Further all the sources historical and archaeological evidence shows that the Senegambian stone circles were built by the Serer people See Gravrand Pangool Gamble Salmon and Njie Burke and Else and F RichardSince they were built by the Serers and evidence have shown that they are built well before the 14th century how then could the Serers have migrated into the area into the 14th century  That doesnt make sense  Now the Serers may have migrated to from the Nile Valley as implied by Henri Gravrand in La Civilisation Sereer Pangool which is one of the sources cited in the article  but as noted by Gravrand if they did came from the Nile it was more than 5 thousand years ago and certainly not the 14th century Further as demonstrated by Gamble Salmon and Njie the Serer are the oldest inhabitants of Senegambia others later moved in  This backs up archealogical source backs up Gravrand Kleine Richard  and so on  If your source was referring to the Guelwars of Kaabu coming from Kaabu to Sine in the 14th century at least I could understand that because it was at that time the Battle of Turubang 1335 occurred as stated by Sarr Becker and others  Even the Wolofs were already present long before the 14th century never mind the Serer people who have been present for thousand of years Further as substantiated in the article with credible sources which all backs up each other the Almoravid wars on Takrur due to religion Islam led to the Serers of Takrur who were finally defeated in Battle to leave Takrur and headed south  That was in the 11th century during AbuBakr IbnUmar and War Jabi  Even those Takrurien Serers came south long before the 14th century to join their other Serer relatives See DaggsLink 2  This link tells us about the meaning of Serer according to Pierret which tallies with Diop  The article had already address this point with notable sources as evident in the article  However since there are controversies regarding the meaning of the word it is relevant to address those as well  Furthermo

