 Rescue The reason I spend my time rescuing articles even ones that paid editors have apparently been involved with is because 1 the intention is to transform the article into something neutral and nonpromotional which is better for Wikipedia than no content at all if the subject is appropriate for inclusion 2 it doesnt actually matter what paid editors work on because that doesnt change what sources do or dont exist on that subject nor does it change editors ability to appraise those sources and 3 Even though I am against paid editing I dislike the idea of deleting articles on the basis of a paid editor having been involved with them when there is potential for improvement  This feels like AfD being used as a vehicle for doling out punishment for unconstructive editing behaviors which is what blocks are for not AfD   drop me a line note not a bot 

    ####Prompt- Does the next message are offensives ? reply with a JSON object (without carriage return or new lines)
    with keys :
    isoffensive (True if it's offensive).
    This this the message : 
 Rescue The reason I spend my time rescuing articles even ones that paid editors have apparently been involved with is because 1 the intention is to transform the article into something neutral and nonpromotional which is better for Wikipedia than no content at all if the subject is appropriate for inclusion 2 it doesnt actually matter what paid editors work on because that doesnt change what sources do or dont exist on that subject nor does it change editors ability to appraise those sources and 3 Even though I am against paid editing I dislike the idea of deleting articles on the basis of a paid editor having been involved with them when there is potential for improvement  This feels like AfD being used as a vehicle for doling out punishment for unconstructive editing behaviors which is what blocks are for not AfD   drop me a line note not a bot 

