You are wrong and based on you initial response you have a personal interest in insuring disinformation  You attack and the level of anger clearly reveals this fact  The only thing pasted were the links used as Excerpts which are allowed under Fair Use copyright laws  But lets get to the real reason you are attempting use dis info to deny that patented technology history and laws and unclassified documents reveal technological Electronic Harassment exist  Let me guess you are part of the problem and as I have witnessed first hand those usually government employees working these programs who are attempting to keep the information outside of the public domainI listed the followingThe Space Preservation Act of 2001HR 2977 Kucinichs which you conveniently left out but decided to mention Congressman Kucinich as if a kook buying to hysteria  credible Microwave auditory effect  which is also a Wikipedia pageThe Frey effect of microwave transmission documented in American Psychologist magazine in 1975 and a Princeton article on Microwave auditory effectA link to a letter by State Rep Jim Guest officially detailing Electronic Weapon TortureUnited States Codes and DOD regulations connected to testing of technology approved for riotcrowd controlDHS Malintent software article by Foxnewscomn used in these testing programsA Veterans Today video with highly credible sources within the scientific community knowledge of this technology dating back decades  That reminds me I also need to include a CNN documentary in 1985 on Directed Energy WeaponsThe information beginning at biological amplications has been approved for use by the author of Synthetic Telepathy and Early Mind Wars officiallyAgain the summary is in my voice again or material approved for use under Fair Use laws as excerptsHowever lets get to the real reason you showed up pissed off egotistically and believing you an authority on this issue and what is an obvious attempt to manage the perception of the public with total BS

    ####Prompt- Does the next message are offensives ? reply with a JSON object (without carriage return or new lines)
    with keys :
    isoffensive (True if it's offensive).
    This this the message : 
You are wrong and based on you initial response you have a personal interest in insuring disinformation  You attack and the level of anger clearly reveals this fact  The only thing pasted were the links used as Excerpts which are allowed under Fair Use copyright laws  But lets get to the real reason you are attempting use dis info to deny that patented technology history and laws and unclassified documents reveal technological Electronic Harassment exist  Let me guess you are part of the problem and as I have witnessed first hand those usually government employees working these programs who are attempting to keep the information outside of the public domainI listed the followingThe Space Preservation Act of 2001HR 2977 Kucinichs which you conveniently left out but decided to mention Congressman Kucinich as if a kook buying to hysteria  credible Microwave auditory effect  which is also a Wikipedia pageThe Frey effect of microwave transmission documented in American Psychologist magazine in 1975 and a Princeton article on Microwave auditory effectA link to a letter by State Rep Jim Guest officially detailing Electronic Weapon TortureUnited States Codes and DOD regulations connected to testing of technology approved for riotcrowd controlDHS Malintent software article by Foxnewscomn used in these testing programsA Veterans Today video with highly credible sources within the scientific community knowledge of this technology dating back decades  That reminds me I also need to include a CNN documentary in 1985 on Directed Energy WeaponsThe information beginning at biological amplications has been approved for use by the author of Synthetic Telepathy and Early Mind Wars officiallyAgain the summary is in my voice again or material approved for use under Fair Use laws as excerptsHowever lets get to the real reason you showed up pissed off egotistically and believing you an authority on this issue and what is an obvious attempt to manage the perception of the public with total BS

