 I think the problem might be the unnecessarily mathematical description up to an additional 24N nautical miles beyond the territorial sea where the territorial sea is N nautical miles wide N12  If you were just skimming over the article it would be easy to misread that the 24N as 24N ie 24 nautical miles  Unless anyone objects Ill change this to a more plainEnglish description such as A Contiguous Zone extends from the limit of the territorial sea up to a distance of 24 nautical miles from the baseline possibly also adding In cases where the country in question has claimed less than 12nm for its territorial waters its contiguous zone may therefore be more than 12nm wide Unless it has already been added and I have just missed it it needs to be mentioned that when territorialcontiguous zones belonging to different countries intersect then the median line is taken as the boundary

    ####Prompt- Does the next message are offensives ? reply with a JSON object (without carriage return or new lines)
    with keys :
    isoffensive (True if it's offensive).
    This this the message : 
 I think the problem might be the unnecessarily mathematical description up to an additional 24N nautical miles beyond the territorial sea where the territorial sea is N nautical miles wide N12  If you were just skimming over the article it would be easy to misread that the 24N as 24N ie 24 nautical miles  Unless anyone objects Ill change this to a more plainEnglish description such as A Contiguous Zone extends from the limit of the territorial sea up to a distance of 24 nautical miles from the baseline possibly also adding In cases where the country in question has claimed less than 12nm for its territorial waters its contiguous zone may therefore be more than 12nm wide Unless it has already been added and I have just missed it it needs to be mentioned that when territorialcontiguous zones belonging to different countries intersect then the median line is taken as the boundary

