Adam Smith Im very pleased to be your first personal example of WPAGF in action   It was completely obvious that your edits were not vandalism due in large part to the thoughtful edit summaries you used and it certainly didnt hurt that you added a whole section of sourced content Too often people attack those editors they disagree with instead of working together or even trying to work together In case you cant tell Im a big fan of the BOLD revert discuss cycle And Im very glad that you are a helpful and reasonable person to deal with Ive had more than a few editors that have tested the limits of my assumption of good faith Keep up the good work  

    ####Prompt- Does the next message are offensives ? reply with a JSON object (without carriage return or new lines)
    with keys :
    isoffensive (True if it's offensive).
    This this the message : 
Adam Smith Im very pleased to be your first personal example of WPAGF in action   It was completely obvious that your edits were not vandalism due in large part to the thoughtful edit summaries you used and it certainly didnt hurt that you added a whole section of sourced content Too often people attack those editors they disagree with instead of working together or even trying to work together In case you cant tell Im a big fan of the BOLD revert discuss cycle And Im very glad that you are a helpful and reasonable person to deal with Ive had more than a few editors that have tested the limits of my assumption of good faith Keep up the good work  

