I still concur with Bilcat  I think there are fundemental differences between the terms Military occupation and Occupied Territories that justify seperate articles  For instance thinking of Irag andor Afghanistan They are under military occupation but couldnt really accurately be called occupied territories  If you think a distinction like this one is valid than it follows that there should be seperate articles   

    ####Prompt- Does the next message are offensives ? reply with a JSON object (without carriage return or new lines)
    with keys :
    isoffensive (True if it's offensive).
    This this the message : 
I still concur with Bilcat  I think there are fundemental differences between the terms Military occupation and Occupied Territories that justify seperate articles  For instance thinking of Irag andor Afghanistan They are under military occupation but couldnt really accurately be called occupied territories  If you think a distinction like this one is valid than it follows that there should be seperate articles   

