Hello FraniaI never mentioned anything yet about Charles VIIIt had no contridicting in factn with salic law as it was only succestion for the private norm and in fact had nothing to do with franceIt was used as a cover up rather then a legal law in a council held in 1317I never even started with the legality of the traty yetI also mentioned reliable sources aout the existence of the doblemnarchyLike the angevin empire because it was destroyed that dosent mean we say The angevin empire never existedI starting with preface of how the doublemonarchy came about or there would have been no reason to create it if Henry wasnt a french kingI didnt take sides and I am just mentioning what historions state and check the sourcesYou said that frenchmen never had regognized the legitimacy of Henry VI when the northen frenchmen and the Burgundians including the duke of brittiny and the pope regognized HenryIt wasnt until the mid1430s when there began a rise of French inscurtionsBecause Henry was expelled that does not mean he didnt have legitimacy to rule FrancePlease be exat in my article in which it is one sidedThe french regency for Henry did exist if you happen to remember John the duke of BedfordI see nothing against NPOV because I never mentioned Charles at all exept when I said he was king as wellYou make it sound that charles was completely inane when he was halfinsaneThe french king also had his wife as a regent in order to rule for him anywayCharles VI was incompetent of ruling and thats why he had a regent who was present during the treatyI promise Frania that I will also expose the right of Charles but I cant dot this in one day because you must understand I have to mention Henry as king of france first in order for it to make sense on how it was formedI am not pushingfor anyside

    ####Prompt- Does the next message are offensives ? reply with a JSON object (without carriage return or new lines)
    with keys :
    isoffensive (True if it's offensive).
    This this the message : 
Hello FraniaI never mentioned anything yet about Charles VIIIt had no contridicting in factn with salic law as it was only succestion for the private norm and in fact had nothing to do with franceIt was used as a cover up rather then a legal law in a council held in 1317I never even started with the legality of the traty yetI also mentioned reliable sources aout the existence of the doblemnarchyLike the angevin empire because it was destroyed that dosent mean we say The angevin empire never existedI starting with preface of how the doublemonarchy came about or there would have been no reason to create it if Henry wasnt a french kingI didnt take sides and I am just mentioning what historions state and check the sourcesYou said that frenchmen never had regognized the legitimacy of Henry VI when the northen frenchmen and the Burgundians including the duke of brittiny and the pope regognized HenryIt wasnt until the mid1430s when there began a rise of French inscurtionsBecause Henry was expelled that does not mean he didnt have legitimacy to rule FrancePlease be exat in my article in which it is one sidedThe french regency for Henry did exist if you happen to remember John the duke of BedfordI see nothing against NPOV because I never mentioned Charles at all exept when I said he was king as wellYou make it sound that charles was completely inane when he was halfinsaneThe french king also had his wife as a regent in order to rule for him anywayCharles VI was incompetent of ruling and thats why he had a regent who was present during the treatyI promise Frania that I will also expose the right of Charles but I cant dot this in one day because you must understand I have to mention Henry as king of france first in order for it to make sense on how it was formedI am not pushingfor anyside

