Edit warringPlease note that repeated attempts to remove sourced material from articles is likely to be considered to be edit warring which may result in your being blocked from further editing of Wikipedia either temporarily or permanently  If you try to make a significant change to an article and somebody else reverses it the appropriate thing to do is to go to the talk page have a reasoned discussion and try to come to a joint view of what is the best way forward for the article see WPBRD  Merely trying to ram through the change you want to make by altering the article again and again is not acceptable and will lead to sanctions being appliedFor the moment the article Haplogroup OM176 YDNA has been locked for two weeks so that noone may edit it  If you sincerely believe that there are issues with some of the material being presented please discuss your concerns on the talk page and try to find an acceptable way forward  Note however that WP exists to make accessible material that has been published in what it considers to be reliable sources  If the material appears significant and relevant to the article and has been published in a legitimate academic journal normally one would expect to find it included in the article  Even if the material is questionable if it is in wide circulation and often presented in discussions of the topic then on those grounds alone it should still be included  If there are good grounds for questioning the material those grounds can be discussed in the article  but note that they must reflect the position of reliable sources that have been published and can be referenced not just your own personal beliefs knowledge or unpublished research See WPNOR for more informationSorry if this seems heavyhanded but in 10 years evolution of Wikipedia these principles have proved to be a key foundation for building stable and improving articles that everybody can contribute toAll best

    ####Prompt- Does the next message are offensives ? reply with a JSON object (without carriage return or new lines)
    with keys :
    isoffensive (True if it's offensive).
    This this the message : 
Edit warringPlease note that repeated attempts to remove sourced material from articles is likely to be considered to be edit warring which may result in your being blocked from further editing of Wikipedia either temporarily or permanently  If you try to make a significant change to an article and somebody else reverses it the appropriate thing to do is to go to the talk page have a reasoned discussion and try to come to a joint view of what is the best way forward for the article see WPBRD  Merely trying to ram through the change you want to make by altering the article again and again is not acceptable and will lead to sanctions being appliedFor the moment the article Haplogroup OM176 YDNA has been locked for two weeks so that noone may edit it  If you sincerely believe that there are issues with some of the material being presented please discuss your concerns on the talk page and try to find an acceptable way forward  Note however that WP exists to make accessible material that has been published in what it considers to be reliable sources  If the material appears significant and relevant to the article and has been published in a legitimate academic journal normally one would expect to find it included in the article  Even if the material is questionable if it is in wide circulation and often presented in discussions of the topic then on those grounds alone it should still be included  If there are good grounds for questioning the material those grounds can be discussed in the article  but note that they must reflect the position of reliable sources that have been published and can be referenced not just your own personal beliefs knowledge or unpublished research See WPNOR for more informationSorry if this seems heavyhanded but in 10 years evolution of Wikipedia these principles have proved to be a key foundation for building stable and improving articles that everybody can contribute toAll best

