Unsure about Ruhrguy StatementsIs this administrator trying to discuss available factsThe BBC released an unranked list of 100 Greatest Britons based on 30000 selfselected voters BBC only somewhat later ranked  this list following ten hours  of further programming and 100000 additional votes This ranking then put Scott at 54th in popularityIt simply unclear whether this 54th ranking is based on 300000 or 130000 votes Moreover whether a few years earlier Scott may have ranked higher or lower in a similar poll is despite implications of current article certainly unknownIf anybody can clearly and simply explain ranking methodology andor what this polls value may be as objective fairly presented and relevant information regarding Scott this could help justify its inclusionIf inclusion of his info is purely a matter of citing WPRS then based on this idea one can moreorless endlessly add cited material to this article which as a previous Wikipedia Featured Article is doubtless a major Paragon in the world of publishingRuhrguy may not understand these issues but his misunderstanding so far isnt made very clear  

    ####Prompt- Does the next message are offensives ? reply with a JSON object (without carriage return or new lines)
    with keys :
    isoffensive (True if it's offensive).
    This this the message : 
Unsure about Ruhrguy StatementsIs this administrator trying to discuss available factsThe BBC released an unranked list of 100 Greatest Britons based on 30000 selfselected voters BBC only somewhat later ranked  this list following ten hours  of further programming and 100000 additional votes This ranking then put Scott at 54th in popularityIt simply unclear whether this 54th ranking is based on 300000 or 130000 votes Moreover whether a few years earlier Scott may have ranked higher or lower in a similar poll is despite implications of current article certainly unknownIf anybody can clearly and simply explain ranking methodology andor what this polls value may be as objective fairly presented and relevant information regarding Scott this could help justify its inclusionIf inclusion of his info is purely a matter of citing WPRS then based on this idea one can moreorless endlessly add cited material to this article which as a previous Wikipedia Featured Article is doubtless a major Paragon in the world of publishingRuhrguy may not understand these issues but his misunderstanding so far isnt made very clear  

