The version I just examined appears to have removed the considerable number of personal attacks and there is a citation that backs up the assertions of criminal charges so Im going to restore the article under its correct name and remove the weeks worth of protection that I applied to forestall further attacks  As you will doubtless realize Wikipedia has to be extremely careful about publishing anything that amounts to criminal libel and the first two versions of the article I examined were undoubtedly libellous  Thanks for attempting to work within our boundaries  talk

    ####Prompt- Does the next message are offensives ? reply with a JSON object (without carriage return or new lines)
    with keys :
    isoffensive (True if it's offensive).
    This this the message : 
The version I just examined appears to have removed the considerable number of personal attacks and there is a citation that backs up the assertions of criminal charges so Im going to restore the article under its correct name and remove the weeks worth of protection that I applied to forestall further attacks  As you will doubtless realize Wikipedia has to be extremely careful about publishing anything that amounts to criminal libel and the first two versions of the article I examined were undoubtedly libellous  Thanks for attempting to work within our boundaries  talk

