The Colgan reference is an alternative medicine supporter Barrett criticizes alternative medicine This is not a thirdparty ref BLP is highly relevant while the BLP violation text is unrelated to Quackwatch Nutritionist Dr Colgan claims that one of Dr Barretts books The Vitamin Pushers hardly discusses supplements but is rather filled with derisive statements about individuals and organizations in the health care and natural foods industry and lumps scientists with obvious charlatans indiscriminately This sentence is the definition of a BLP violation   the lead This controversial edit added text to the lead about Barrett but this article is about Quackwatch   missing sentence previous versionQuackwatch has been regularly criticized by the groups it investigates such as herbalists homeopaths and other alternative medicine practitioners7 A number of practitioners and supporters of alternative medicine criticize Quackwatch for its criticism of alternative medicine676970 Of one of the criticisms BaoAnh NguyenKhoa wrote It appears that Quackwatchcom uses the emotional reaction of its critics to substantiate its position40David Hufford Professor of Medical Humanities at the Penn State College of Medicine wrote an opinion paper in which he asserts that Quackwatch would be more effective if it relied more on research and less on personal beliefs70 In regard to the debate over water fluoridation an antifluoridation article in the National Review quotes a generally informative and persuasive Quackwatch article71 but criticizes its rhetorical style as perhaps not the best way to win an argument especially with seriousminded people72currenbt versionQuackwatch has been regularly criticized by the groups it investigates such as nutritionists herbalists homeopaths and other alternative medicine practitioners86870 Of one of the criticisms BaoAnh NguyenKhoa wrote It appears that Quackwatchcom uses the emotional reaction of its critics to substantiate its position41 Nutritionist Dr Colgan claims that one of Dr Barretts books The Vitamin Pushers hardly discusses supplements but is rather filled with derisive statements about individuals and organizations in the health care and natural foods industry and lumps scientists with obvious charlatans indiscriminately71David Hufford Professor of Medical Humanities at the Penn State College of Medicine wrote an opinion paper in which he asserts that Quackwatch would be more effective if it relied more on research and less on personal beliefs70 In regard to the debate over water fluoridation an antifluoridation article in the National Review quotes a generally informative and persuasive Quackwatch article72 but criticizes its rhetorical style as perhaps not the best way to win an argument especially with seriousminded people73This controversial edit removed a sentence A number of practitioners and supporters of alternative medicine criticize Quackwatch for its criticism of alternative medicine I suggest all the recent controversial changes be reverted to the last stable version Make small edits and save them and discuss substantial changes here  

    ####Prompt- Does the next message are offensives ? reply with a JSON object (without carriage return or new lines)
    with keys :
    isoffensive (True if it's offensive).
    This this the message : 
The Colgan reference is an alternative medicine supporter Barrett criticizes alternative medicine This is not a thirdparty ref BLP is highly relevant while the BLP violation text is unrelated to Quackwatch Nutritionist Dr Colgan claims that one of Dr Barretts books The Vitamin Pushers hardly discusses supplements but is rather filled with derisive statements about individuals and organizations in the health care and natural foods industry and lumps scientists with obvious charlatans indiscriminately This sentence is the definition of a BLP violation   the lead This controversial edit added text to the lead about Barrett but this article is about Quackwatch   missing sentence previous versionQuackwatch has been regularly criticized by the groups it investigates such as herbalists homeopaths and other alternative medicine practitioners7 A number of practitioners and supporters of alternative medicine criticize Quackwatch for its criticism of alternative medicine676970 Of one of the criticisms BaoAnh NguyenKhoa wrote It appears that Quackwatchcom uses the emotional reaction of its critics to substantiate its position40David Hufford Professor of Medical Humanities at the Penn State College of Medicine wrote an opinion paper in which he asserts that Quackwatch would be more effective if it relied more on research and less on personal beliefs70 In regard to the debate over water fluoridation an antifluoridation article in the National Review quotes a generally informative and persuasive Quackwatch article71 but criticizes its rhetorical style as perhaps not the best way to win an argument especially with seriousminded people72currenbt versionQuackwatch has been regularly criticized by the groups it investigates such as nutritionists herbalists homeopaths and other alternative medicine practitioners86870 Of one of the criticisms BaoAnh NguyenKhoa wrote It appears that Quackwatchcom uses the emotional reaction of its critics to substantiate its position41 Nutritionist Dr Colgan claims that one of Dr Barretts books The Vitamin Pushers hardly discusses supplements but is rather filled with derisive statements about individuals and organizations in the health care and natural foods industry and lumps scientists with obvious charlatans indiscriminately71David Hufford Professor of Medical Humanities at the Penn State College of Medicine wrote an opinion paper in which he asserts that Quackwatch would be more effective if it relied more on research and less on personal beliefs70 In regard to the debate over water fluoridation an antifluoridation article in the National Review quotes a generally informative and persuasive Quackwatch article72 but criticizes its rhetorical style as perhaps not the best way to win an argument especially with seriousminded people73This controversial edit removed a sentence A number of practitioners and supporters of alternative medicine criticize Quackwatch for its criticism of alternative medicine I suggest all the recent controversial changes be reverted to the last stable version Make small edits and save them and discuss substantial changes here  

