Droop is not better than HagenbachBischoff Okay suppose we have an instant runoff election where we have 50 votes with PartyA as first preference and PartyB as second preference We also have 50 votes with PartyB as first preference and PartyA as second preferenceUsing the HagenbachBischoff quota of 50 both parties reach quota and there is a tieUsing the Droop Quota of 51 neither party reaches the quota but as they have the same number of first preference votes neither can be eliminated and we have a tie anywaySo using the Droop Quota does not eliminate ties It is a much more ugly formula and has the property that parties with majority support can recieve a minority of seatsCan anybody give me a good reason why the world is still using the Droop Quota

    ####Prompt- Does the next message are offensives ? reply with a JSON object (without carriage return or new lines)
    with keys :
    isoffensive (True if it's offensive).
    This this the message : 
Droop is not better than HagenbachBischoff Okay suppose we have an instant runoff election where we have 50 votes with PartyA as first preference and PartyB as second preference We also have 50 votes with PartyB as first preference and PartyA as second preferenceUsing the HagenbachBischoff quota of 50 both parties reach quota and there is a tieUsing the Droop Quota of 51 neither party reaches the quota but as they have the same number of first preference votes neither can be eliminated and we have a tie anywaySo using the Droop Quota does not eliminate ties It is a much more ugly formula and has the property that parties with majority support can recieve a minority of seatsCan anybody give me a good reason why the world is still using the Droop Quota

