The debate on the deletion under G7 begun at 0740 UTC on 4 November 2006 did not throw any light on the applicability of rule G7 as most respondents confined themselves to other considerations notability of the subject suitability of the article for Wikipedia etc  No one managed to disprove the applicability of the CSD G7 rule and it should have properly overridden all other considerations  UserCharles Matthews admitted in a remarkable access of frankness that the whole matter at hand was not about Wikipedia policies at all but about his personal sense of injury writing at 1308 UTC 8 November 2006 But thats entirely to do with editors not wanting to be abused

    ####Prompt- Does the next message are offensives ? reply with a JSON object (without carriage return or new lines)
    with keys :
    isoffensive (True if it's offensive).
    This this the message : 
The debate on the deletion under G7 begun at 0740 UTC on 4 November 2006 did not throw any light on the applicability of rule G7 as most respondents confined themselves to other considerations notability of the subject suitability of the article for Wikipedia etc  No one managed to disprove the applicability of the CSD G7 rule and it should have properly overridden all other considerations  UserCharles Matthews admitted in a remarkable access of frankness that the whole matter at hand was not about Wikipedia policies at all but about his personal sense of injury writing at 1308 UTC 8 November 2006 But thats entirely to do with editors not wanting to be abused

