It has nothing to do with whether or not the edit is anonymous or whether you take the edit seriously  Its based on Wikipedias definition of vandalism which pretty blatantly states that any good faith effort to edit is not vandalism  I fully agree the edit wasnt encyclopedic but it wasnt vandalism since the editor was merely trying to expand on the relationship between John and Cameron

    ####Prompt- Does the next message are offensives ? reply with a JSON object (without carriage return or new lines)
    with keys :
    isoffensive (True if it's offensive).
    This this the message : 
It has nothing to do with whether or not the edit is anonymous or whether you take the edit seriously  Its based on Wikipedias definition of vandalism which pretty blatantly states that any good faith effort to edit is not vandalism  I fully agree the edit wasnt encyclopedic but it wasnt vandalism since the editor was merely trying to expand on the relationship between John and Cameron

