Right right When you provide a source for the autonomy of the NOViPOS then we can take that into consideration They were geographically seperated from the Partisan Main Operational Group in Bosnia and Montenegro but they were not autonomous Moving on   talk As I was saying the article was created as a WPPOVFORKIt represents the nationalist POV that Partisan movement in Slovenia were somehow separate or exceptionally autonomous from the rest of the Partisan movement Which is incorrectIt creates a nonexistant organization the Slovene Partisans There were Slovene Partisans but there was no organization defined by ethnicity within the Partisan movementIt basically covers Slovene WWII history instead of the Partisans themselvesEven so it overlaps completely with the scope of the Yugoslav Partisans articleThis article in its current organization serves only to perpetuate the nationalist notions of one user Its extreme language is a testament to this among other things It should either be restructured as a Slovene WWII history article or it should be merged As it stands its a violation of policy WPPOVFORK   talk 

    ####Prompt- Does the next message are offensives ? reply with a JSON object (without carriage return or new lines)
    with keys :
    isoffensive (True if it's offensive).
    This this the message : 
Right right When you provide a source for the autonomy of the NOViPOS then we can take that into consideration They were geographically seperated from the Partisan Main Operational Group in Bosnia and Montenegro but they were not autonomous Moving on   talk As I was saying the article was created as a WPPOVFORKIt represents the nationalist POV that Partisan movement in Slovenia were somehow separate or exceptionally autonomous from the rest of the Partisan movement Which is incorrectIt creates a nonexistant organization the Slovene Partisans There were Slovene Partisans but there was no organization defined by ethnicity within the Partisan movementIt basically covers Slovene WWII history instead of the Partisans themselvesEven so it overlaps completely with the scope of the Yugoslav Partisans articleThis article in its current organization serves only to perpetuate the nationalist notions of one user Its extreme language is a testament to this among other things It should either be restructured as a Slovene WWII history article or it should be merged As it stands its a violation of policy WPPOVFORK   talk 

