The status quo is an argument that needs to stop Editors have opposed it for some time and it should have been removed months ago Editors edit warred and eventually we stuck all the names in I dont see that as status quo or consensus over a long term And maybe we should get a count of how many editors have edited it in over the last year I can think of one or two editors alone who probably have huge numbers on this It seems only fair to get the whole scope And your count also fails to recognize the number of dirfferent editors that agree with the reasoning to remove

    ####Prompt- Does the next message are offensives ? reply with a JSON object (without carriage return or new lines)
    with keys :
    isoffensive (True if it's offensive).
    This this the message : 
The status quo is an argument that needs to stop Editors have opposed it for some time and it should have been removed months ago Editors edit warred and eventually we stuck all the names in I dont see that as status quo or consensus over a long term And maybe we should get a count of how many editors have edited it in over the last year I can think of one or two editors alone who probably have huge numbers on this It seems only fair to get the whole scope And your count also fails to recognize the number of dirfferent editors that agree with the reasoning to remove

