Im having a bit of trouble understanding what you are saying You seem to be intent on invoking no consensus as in me and my buddies will keep on revert warring on this to the end as a way of disrupting this article  essentially a version of WPIDONTLIKEIT As it happens neither WPIDONTLIKEIT nor consensus the policy explicitly says that consensus cannot be held hostage trumps WPNPOV and WPRS which are not just policies but also fundamental pillarsI didnt say anything about Grifith nor Tibi for now and I certainly did not say these guys were fringe if that is the meaning of your last nongrammatical sentence 

    ####Prompt- Does the next message are offensives ? reply with a JSON object (without carriage return or new lines)
    with keys :
    isoffensive (True if it's offensive).
    This this the message : 
Im having a bit of trouble understanding what you are saying You seem to be intent on invoking no consensus as in me and my buddies will keep on revert warring on this to the end as a way of disrupting this article  essentially a version of WPIDONTLIKEIT As it happens neither WPIDONTLIKEIT nor consensus the policy explicitly says that consensus cannot be held hostage trumps WPNPOV and WPRS which are not just policies but also fundamental pillarsI didnt say anything about Grifith nor Tibi for now and I certainly did not say these guys were fringe if that is the meaning of your last nongrammatical sentence 

