Youre conflating issues here This is not an assumption of bad faith its adhering to what the source actually says William M Connolleys extemporaneous comments here are not a source the publication RealClimate is the sourceThis is just a frank evaluation of what the source says RealClimate says nothing about who worked on the article or how it was written but we know that unsigned group pieces are often not equivalent to joint authorship For another analogy consider per curium legal opinions Per curium means that all of the judges or justices agreed but its a very different thing from all of them signing the opinion Typically theyre less controversial cases so one judges clerk writes the opinion then theyre circulated for comment But the other judges typically dont scrutinize it as closely as if their name was on the line there are many examples of judges railing against dicta that they theoretically endorsed just a couple of years earliersometimes even within the same case Unanimous opinions where every judge signs are different and they reflect a higher level of collaboration as in Brown v Board of Education The bottom line is that the source itself doesnt say who wrote it The commentators on BLPN seem to think this is an important distinction  Luke 

    ####Prompt- Does the next message are offensives ? reply with a JSON object (without carriage return or new lines)
    with keys :
    isoffensive (True if it's offensive).
    This this the message : 
Youre conflating issues here This is not an assumption of bad faith its adhering to what the source actually says William M Connolleys extemporaneous comments here are not a source the publication RealClimate is the sourceThis is just a frank evaluation of what the source says RealClimate says nothing about who worked on the article or how it was written but we know that unsigned group pieces are often not equivalent to joint authorship For another analogy consider per curium legal opinions Per curium means that all of the judges or justices agreed but its a very different thing from all of them signing the opinion Typically theyre less controversial cases so one judges clerk writes the opinion then theyre circulated for comment But the other judges typically dont scrutinize it as closely as if their name was on the line there are many examples of judges railing against dicta that they theoretically endorsed just a couple of years earliersometimes even within the same case Unanimous opinions where every judge signs are different and they reflect a higher level of collaboration as in Brown v Board of Education The bottom line is that the source itself doesnt say who wrote it The commentators on BLPN seem to think this is an important distinction  Luke 

