The vandalism was the insertion into the page of a controversial issue which has no bearing on the subject of the page  The material had evidently been inserted because some previous editors erroneously believed and took at face value some recent propaganda published by a Seattle public relations firm that had no connection to the subject  The previous editors evidently adopted the unwarranted assumption that the propaganda amounted to a verified fact

    ####Prompt- Does the next message are offensives ? reply with a JSON object (without carriage return or new lines)
    with keys :
    isoffensive (True if it's offensive).
    This this the message : 
The vandalism was the insertion into the page of a controversial issue which has no bearing on the subject of the page  The material had evidently been inserted because some previous editors erroneously believed and took at face value some recent propaganda published by a Seattle public relations firm that had no connection to the subject  The previous editors evidently adopted the unwarranted assumption that the propaganda amounted to a verified fact

