 The email controversy is in the wrong section My bold edit was reverted by  and I was directed to previous discussions In addition to what I believe were improvements to grammar and sentence structure I moved the email controversy sections to the bottom of the US Secretary of State section where it seems to belong  see this version Im puzzling over the reasoning for having an oddball miscellaneous section called Clinton Foundation emails issue and other activities sort of like Monkey grapefruits and things found on a Chevrolet to my ears This was previously discussed here TalkHillary ClintonArchive 25Location and section header relative to emails controversy Im pinging  and  who were involved in this previous discussion From a readers perspective I find it jarring to read about this relatively major controversy outside of the context of the part of Mrs Clintons career in which it happened  MrX 

    ####Prompt- Does the next message are offensives ? reply with a JSON object (without carriage return or new lines)
    with keys :
    isoffensive (True if it's offensive).
    This this the message : 
 The email controversy is in the wrong section My bold edit was reverted by  and I was directed to previous discussions In addition to what I believe were improvements to grammar and sentence structure I moved the email controversy sections to the bottom of the US Secretary of State section where it seems to belong  see this version Im puzzling over the reasoning for having an oddball miscellaneous section called Clinton Foundation emails issue and other activities sort of like Monkey grapefruits and things found on a Chevrolet to my ears This was previously discussed here TalkHillary ClintonArchive 25Location and section header relative to emails controversy Im pinging  and  who were involved in this previous discussion From a readers perspective I find it jarring to read about this relatively major controversy outside of the context of the part of Mrs Clintons career in which it happened  MrX 

