I took out your Frank Knight bit because it was only about him translating Weber not about Webers influence on his thought If you find reliable sources to cite Knight being influenced by Weber that information is appropriate for say the Legacy section However I would ask that this kind of expansion be saved for after the GA process A general note if mainstream thought today puts Weber in the sociology box then that is the articles main stance Wikipedia ideally mirrors mainstream thought We also make note of significant minor viewopoints observing the proper weight of those viewpoints in relation to the mainstream There is certainly room in the article to describe Webers influence in economics

    ####Prompt- Does the next message are offensives ? reply with a JSON object (without carriage return or new lines)
    with keys :
    isoffensive (True if it's offensive).
    This this the message : 
I took out your Frank Knight bit because it was only about him translating Weber not about Webers influence on his thought If you find reliable sources to cite Knight being influenced by Weber that information is appropriate for say the Legacy section However I would ask that this kind of expansion be saved for after the GA process A general note if mainstream thought today puts Weber in the sociology box then that is the articles main stance Wikipedia ideally mirrors mainstream thought We also make note of significant minor viewopoints observing the proper weight of those viewpoints in relation to the mainstream There is certainly room in the article to describe Webers influence in economics

