False Information People are posting false information about filiquarian publishing without stating references Whenever I have added or fixed things I have always added a reference Doug Weller and moonraker are going are saying that books by Filiqurian Publishing do not include the gfdl license and are not following the rules while their own reference to pete forsythes page states that ALL the rules are being followed I am not with filiqurian publishing but I support what they do As someone who has contributed to wikipedia under a username and not anonymously I disagree with PediaPresss attempt at getting away with not including the gfdl license in pdf examples of what their books will look like Filiqurian has followed these rules I feel like an exception is being made for PediaPress while Filiqurians being attacked when they actually ARE following the rulesOne of the articles I have contributed a great deal to is the solar system article while PediaPress has distributerd without links to providing credit or the gfdl license It even includes pictures that dont include the proper licenses Give me a break One of those pictures was even one that was created by the lab I scientific study lab that I work for No credit at all

    ####Prompt- Does the next message are offensives ? reply with a JSON object (without carriage return or new lines)
    with keys :
    isoffensive (True if it's offensive).
    This this the message : 
False Information People are posting false information about filiquarian publishing without stating references Whenever I have added or fixed things I have always added a reference Doug Weller and moonraker are going are saying that books by Filiqurian Publishing do not include the gfdl license and are not following the rules while their own reference to pete forsythes page states that ALL the rules are being followed I am not with filiqurian publishing but I support what they do As someone who has contributed to wikipedia under a username and not anonymously I disagree with PediaPresss attempt at getting away with not including the gfdl license in pdf examples of what their books will look like Filiqurian has followed these rules I feel like an exception is being made for PediaPress while Filiqurians being attacked when they actually ARE following the rulesOne of the articles I have contributed a great deal to is the solar system article while PediaPress has distributerd without links to providing credit or the gfdl license It even includes pictures that dont include the proper licenses Give me a break One of those pictures was even one that was created by the lab I scientific study lab that I work for No credit at all

