 How is saying At least they are historians and not terrorists to be construed as attacking another religion  Saying someone is an historian is attacking a religion  I did not know that historian has any abusive connotations please correct me if my knowledge of English is wrong and historian is an abuse I really need to understand how this can be seen as an example of  Extremiststyle one way traffic And your equating me with Osama is a personal attack Please being an admin and an arbcom admin at that some restraint is expected of you Cool down Sir and be civil It is a wind up and you having warned me of windups should know better Please do walk the talkIf you were not so bent in trying to show my faults you would in the same section  as you have linked to above also find my response to your current accusation which said it is not the number of times Subhash was banned by Blnguyen but the number of times he should have been and  he was let off So it would seem that someone who cannot read is busy worrying about the counting ability of anotherAnd this issue was discussed last year the time to respond was then at that time you were also asked direct questions by me which you chose to ignoreAnd that an arbcom member is so bent of fighting with a mere editor and besmirching him  must be also a source of great pride for some I have not commented on your religion or your country you have on mine Shows who has  attacked people based on national identities or religion So that too must make someone very proud Defending a person or standing up for them does not mean one agrees with every statement that they may have made Show me where I have defended Bhaisaabs anti religion comments So you have now made another false claim above that I defend anti semetic speech By the same generalisation what would you say about an admin not even reacting to an virulent anti Muslim speech made by his protege even after I posted it on the admins talk page  Further that admins  defending his protege then makes the admin  by your logic above a defender of anti Muslim speech That  I an editor with no powers is fighting a biased and prejudiced person misusing his position  is a great source of pride for me Also please do note that since the arbcom elections I have not bothered to be involved with you till you went about posting details about meand your attempt to trace my location  to an editor hostile to me So rather than me bent on besmirching you as you seem to potray the fact is that my opposing you on the arbcom has got me special attention from you which is gross abuse of your position  

    ####Prompt- Does the next message are offensives ? reply with a JSON object (without carriage return or new lines)
    with keys :
    isoffensive (True if it's offensive).
    This this the message : 
 How is saying At least they are historians and not terrorists to be construed as attacking another religion  Saying someone is an historian is attacking a religion  I did not know that historian has any abusive connotations please correct me if my knowledge of English is wrong and historian is an abuse I really need to understand how this can be seen as an example of  Extremiststyle one way traffic And your equating me with Osama is a personal attack Please being an admin and an arbcom admin at that some restraint is expected of you Cool down Sir and be civil It is a wind up and you having warned me of windups should know better Please do walk the talkIf you were not so bent in trying to show my faults you would in the same section  as you have linked to above also find my response to your current accusation which said it is not the number of times Subhash was banned by Blnguyen but the number of times he should have been and  he was let off So it would seem that someone who cannot read is busy worrying about the counting ability of anotherAnd this issue was discussed last year the time to respond was then at that time you were also asked direct questions by me which you chose to ignoreAnd that an arbcom member is so bent of fighting with a mere editor and besmirching him  must be also a source of great pride for some I have not commented on your religion or your country you have on mine Shows who has  attacked people based on national identities or religion So that too must make someone very proud Defending a person or standing up for them does not mean one agrees with every statement that they may have made Show me where I have defended Bhaisaabs anti religion comments So you have now made another false claim above that I defend anti semetic speech By the same generalisation what would you say about an admin not even reacting to an virulent anti Muslim speech made by his protege even after I posted it on the admins talk page  Further that admins  defending his protege then makes the admin  by your logic above a defender of anti Muslim speech That  I an editor with no powers is fighting a biased and prejudiced person misusing his position  is a great source of pride for me Also please do note that since the arbcom elections I have not bothered to be involved with you till you went about posting details about meand your attempt to trace my location  to an editor hostile to me So rather than me bent on besmirching you as you seem to potray the fact is that my opposing you on the arbcom has got me special attention from you which is gross abuse of your position  

