I got rid of this first paragraph for several reasonsCapitalism is typically and generally defined as an economic system where the means of production are privately owned and operated for profit investment pricing and distribution decisions are privately made rather than instituted by state control and a free market exists for goods and servicesFirst typically and generally are weasel words  This definition represents RJIIs point of view and violates our neutral poiint of view  Second I do not agree that capitalism is an economic system there are many scholars who argue that it is not an economic system and an NPOV description of capitalism cant make an assertion that represents one point of view  Third there are noncapitalist societies where the means of production are privately owned and some scholars argue that capitalism threatens the private ownership of capital so again this definition is inaccurate or at best violates NPOV policy  Fourth it is just poorly written the second and third clauses are redundant  Fifth it leaves out what many consider the defining feature of capitalism which is the commoditization of labor  Any definition with this many problems has to go      Talk  1742 30 Mar 2005 UTC

    ####Prompt- Does the next message are offensives ? reply with a JSON object (without carriage return or new lines)
    with keys :
    isoffensive (True if it's offensive).
    This this the message : 
I got rid of this first paragraph for several reasonsCapitalism is typically and generally defined as an economic system where the means of production are privately owned and operated for profit investment pricing and distribution decisions are privately made rather than instituted by state control and a free market exists for goods and servicesFirst typically and generally are weasel words  This definition represents RJIIs point of view and violates our neutral poiint of view  Second I do not agree that capitalism is an economic system there are many scholars who argue that it is not an economic system and an NPOV description of capitalism cant make an assertion that represents one point of view  Third there are noncapitalist societies where the means of production are privately owned and some scholars argue that capitalism threatens the private ownership of capital so again this definition is inaccurate or at best violates NPOV policy  Fourth it is just poorly written the second and third clauses are redundant  Fifth it leaves out what many consider the defining feature of capitalism which is the commoditization of labor  Any definition with this many problems has to go      Talk  1742 30 Mar 2005 UTC

