I think that precedents should be maintained also dont change Brendons for a chance to return to to return the vote was clearly for a chance to return If there is a vote for something other than evictions the descriptor needs to clearly depict the vote that happened Honestly the spit Week 5 clearly indicated what happened just because a vote didnt happen doesnt mean it should be noted in the table in that manner If this is changed then this applies to the similar Nominations Table in other Big Brother articles as well Keith Cassi and Dominic did enter the House for a short period of time and were seen by the other Housemates So to put them in as guests is not wrong This needs to be discussed for a permanent result ucard 16 

    ####Prompt- Does the next message are offensives ? reply with a JSON object (without carriage return or new lines)
    with keys :
    isoffensive (True if it's offensive).
    This this the message : 
I think that precedents should be maintained also dont change Brendons for a chance to return to to return the vote was clearly for a chance to return If there is a vote for something other than evictions the descriptor needs to clearly depict the vote that happened Honestly the spit Week 5 clearly indicated what happened just because a vote didnt happen doesnt mean it should be noted in the table in that manner If this is changed then this applies to the similar Nominations Table in other Big Brother articles as well Keith Cassi and Dominic did enter the House for a short period of time and were seen by the other Housemates So to put them in as guests is not wrong This needs to be discussed for a permanent result ucard 16 

