Your agreeing with Mr Lutz does not make his opinion significant and the other folks you cite you dont have support for the range of claims youre making for them you show two individuals commenting on samesex marriage and none for the other things youre claiming as nontraditional marriage oddly including polygamy which has a long and broad tradition much less showing that the reason for opposition matches Lutz It also creates a very odd focus in the article as there is very little on conservative versus liberal views most of the invocations of the words conservative and liberal in the article are reflecting religious rather than political status and to suddenly focus on supposed liberal objections in a realm where support appears more likely to come from liberals with conservatives largely objecting seems like spin Im removing this section as it has been removed repeatedly by several editors making it clear that you dont have consensus please achieve consensus in Talk before reinserting it   

    ####Prompt- Does the next message are offensives ? reply with a JSON object (without carriage return or new lines)
    with keys :
    isoffensive (True if it's offensive).
    This this the message : 
Your agreeing with Mr Lutz does not make his opinion significant and the other folks you cite you dont have support for the range of claims youre making for them you show two individuals commenting on samesex marriage and none for the other things youre claiming as nontraditional marriage oddly including polygamy which has a long and broad tradition much less showing that the reason for opposition matches Lutz It also creates a very odd focus in the article as there is very little on conservative versus liberal views most of the invocations of the words conservative and liberal in the article are reflecting religious rather than political status and to suddenly focus on supposed liberal objections in a realm where support appears more likely to come from liberals with conservatives largely objecting seems like spin Im removing this section as it has been removed repeatedly by several editors making it clear that you dont have consensus please achieve consensus in Talk before reinserting it   

