Proposal for a revised introductionOkay I have a proposal for a new intro which needs to be worked on more but I wanted to put what I have so far out there Im not at all wild about the specific wording at points but I think youll get the drift  The intro has been the victim of a lot of reversions and I think it would be good for us to get that straight  Right now there is no criticism of Chomskys position on Nicaragua v United States in the intro actually Ultramarine appears to have added it back but I have a different version and I think there obviously should be  Ive also added some new stuff  Here it is and Ill try to explain what I was trying to do and what I think is missing after the proposed text The first two sentences are the same including sources though I have removed some italics which seemed unnecessaryThe United States of America has been accused of funding training and harboring individuals and groups who engage in terrorism by some legal scholars other governments and human rights organizations among others Linguist and US foreign policy critic Noam Chomsky argues that the US has been legally found guilty of international terrorism based on the verdict by the International Court of Justice in Nicaragua v United States which condemned the United States federal government not for terrorism per se but for its unlawful use of forcecite weburl

    ####Prompt- Does the next message are offensives ? reply with a JSON object (without carriage return or new lines)
    with keys :
    isoffensive (True if it's offensive).
    This this the message : 
Proposal for a revised introductionOkay I have a proposal for a new intro which needs to be worked on more but I wanted to put what I have so far out there Im not at all wild about the specific wording at points but I think youll get the drift  The intro has been the victim of a lot of reversions and I think it would be good for us to get that straight  Right now there is no criticism of Chomskys position on Nicaragua v United States in the intro actually Ultramarine appears to have added it back but I have a different version and I think there obviously should be  Ive also added some new stuff  Here it is and Ill try to explain what I was trying to do and what I think is missing after the proposed text The first two sentences are the same including sources though I have removed some italics which seemed unnecessaryThe United States of America has been accused of funding training and harboring individuals and groups who engage in terrorism by some legal scholars other governments and human rights organizations among others Linguist and US foreign policy critic Noam Chomsky argues that the US has been legally found guilty of international terrorism based on the verdict by the International Court of Justice in Nicaragua v United States which condemned the United States federal government not for terrorism per se but for its unlawful use of forcecite weburl

