Loathing is your word not mine I merely referred to whether or not it is a reliable source As for your point I am usually one to call others to task for invoking WPBLP but I think it applies in this case We are always bound by WPV as one of the five pillars of Wikipedia but when what we are writing is potentially legally actionable against the Wikipedia Foundation there is an urgency attached as well My judgment was that the edit in question could not stay as it was written with only the Post as a source I stand by that judgment Nothing prevents a willing colleague from readding informationafter a suitable source is found    talk  

    ####Prompt- Does the next message are offensives ? reply with a JSON object (without carriage return or new lines)
    with keys :
    isoffensive (True if it's offensive).
    This this the message : 
Loathing is your word not mine I merely referred to whether or not it is a reliable source As for your point I am usually one to call others to task for invoking WPBLP but I think it applies in this case We are always bound by WPV as one of the five pillars of Wikipedia but when what we are writing is potentially legally actionable against the Wikipedia Foundation there is an urgency attached as well My judgment was that the edit in question could not stay as it was written with only the Post as a source I stand by that judgment Nothing prevents a willing colleague from readding informationafter a suitable source is found    talk  

