Im not so sure Ive been an advocate of letting most of the material in the article stay as it adds to the historical record of Ark research and narrative analysis However this link qualifies as neither Its a modern website that tries to be an authority on the subject without critical analysis I dont think it qualifies as a reliable source

    ####Prompt- Does the next message are offensives ? reply with a JSON object (without carriage return or new lines)
    with keys :
    isoffensive (True if it's offensive).
    This this the message : 
Im not so sure Ive been an advocate of letting most of the material in the article stay as it adds to the historical record of Ark research and narrative analysis However this link qualifies as neither Its a modern website that tries to be an authority on the subject without critical analysis I dont think it qualifies as a reliable source

