In the other recent situations discussion i see now that SarekOfVulcan later asserted incorrectly that I had characterized a new users edits in a way that is misleading to the point of disruption  SarekOfVulcan apparently believed that I meant to misrepresent that a new users contribution was acceptable as written which I did not say or mean  In this instance Orlady as usual following my edits actually helped out by providing some advice to the new user  SarekOfVulcan has made some toostrong snap judgments I think that are incorrect  I think there are differences of opinion worth discussing but that SarekOfVulcans block is not justified ncram 

    ####Prompt- Does the next message are offensives ? reply with a JSON object (without carriage return or new lines)
    with keys :
    isoffensive (True if it's offensive).
    This this the message : 
In the other recent situations discussion i see now that SarekOfVulcan later asserted incorrectly that I had characterized a new users edits in a way that is misleading to the point of disruption  SarekOfVulcan apparently believed that I meant to misrepresent that a new users contribution was acceptable as written which I did not say or mean  In this instance Orlady as usual following my edits actually helped out by providing some advice to the new user  SarekOfVulcan has made some toostrong snap judgments I think that are incorrect  I think there are differences of opinion worth discussing but that SarekOfVulcans block is not justified ncram 

