Hi OhConfucious Correct as you say 1 no the RfC didnt anticipate that the disruption would move from titles to ledes hence the need to reopen the RfC 2 no with the Gajs alphabet DjĐ because their appearances are sufficiently different as to potentially cause confusion  and this exception was recognised in the RfC and should continue to be recognised as an exception if the RfC is reopened too The CategorySerbian female tennis players contains none CategorySerbian male tennis players only contains 3 such players  which are still at English names so the 100x Facundo Argüello tennis ledes affected do not include these 3 anyway The 100x ledes affected are all of the François Hollande or Charlotte Brontë do not come in the 3x because their appearances are sufficiently different as to potentially cause confusion  there is no FrançoisFrancois BrontëBronte confusion issue as with DjĐ Hence this is simply confirming the original RfC result   

    ####Prompt- Does the next message are offensives ? reply with a JSON object (without carriage return or new lines)
    with keys :
    isoffensive (True if it's offensive).
    This this the message : 
Hi OhConfucious Correct as you say 1 no the RfC didnt anticipate that the disruption would move from titles to ledes hence the need to reopen the RfC 2 no with the Gajs alphabet DjĐ because their appearances are sufficiently different as to potentially cause confusion  and this exception was recognised in the RfC and should continue to be recognised as an exception if the RfC is reopened too The CategorySerbian female tennis players contains none CategorySerbian male tennis players only contains 3 such players  which are still at English names so the 100x Facundo Argüello tennis ledes affected do not include these 3 anyway The 100x ledes affected are all of the François Hollande or Charlotte Brontë do not come in the 3x because their appearances are sufficiently different as to potentially cause confusion  there is no FrançoisFrancois BrontëBronte confusion issue as with DjĐ Hence this is simply confirming the original RfC result   

