I think the David Letterman argument is fine however one must ask whether to highlight particular disputes at all is relevant as the entire document highlights nothing but contentious issueshowever I beileve Bill Oreilly likes to be in contentious issuesAs to the specifics of why I erased ityou provided no dispute quotations taken from Bill Oreilly  He had some zingers that nailed Dave hard what was chosen was the weakest of his points vs the strongest of lettermansRewrite it  Oreillys comment about not calling people who blow up innocent women and children on his show as a devestating blow to Letterman and a clear clever and concise statement

    ####Prompt- Does the next message are offensives ? reply with a JSON object (without carriage return or new lines)
    with keys :
    isoffensive (True if it's offensive).
    This this the message : 
I think the David Letterman argument is fine however one must ask whether to highlight particular disputes at all is relevant as the entire document highlights nothing but contentious issueshowever I beileve Bill Oreilly likes to be in contentious issuesAs to the specifics of why I erased ityou provided no dispute quotations taken from Bill Oreilly  He had some zingers that nailed Dave hard what was chosen was the weakest of his points vs the strongest of lettermansRewrite it  Oreillys comment about not calling people who blow up innocent women and children on his show as a devestating blow to Letterman and a clear clever and concise statement

