GA ReassessmentThis discussion is transcluded from TalkHurstEulessBedford Independent School DistrictGA1 The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment This article has been reviewed as part of WikipediaWikiProject Good articlesProject quality task force in an effort to ensure all listed Good articles continue to meet the Good article criteria In reviewing the article I have found there are some issues that may need to be addressed listed below I will check back in seven days If these issues are addressed the article will remain listed as a Good article Otherwise it may be delisted such a decision may be challenged through WPGAR If improved after it has been delisted it may be nominated at WPGAN Feel free to drop a message on my talk page if you have any questions and many thanks for all the hard work that has gone into this article thus farGA review see here for criteriaThis article fails primarily on WPLAYOUT there are far to many embedded lists The whole article is really just a collection of lists with short sections of prose in between Even the Programs section is really little more than a list disguised as prose There are also major problems with the referencing there are a great number of dead links which I have marked and theres an unfortunate mix of inline references and external links in the textThis is just the tip of the iceberg I really dont think there is any way of saving this article without extensive work Still I will give it the normal week on hold please contact me if anybody decides to rewrite it   

    ####Prompt- Does the next message are offensives ? reply with a JSON object (without carriage return or new lines)
    with keys :
    isoffensive (True if it's offensive).
    This this the message : 
GA ReassessmentThis discussion is transcluded from TalkHurstEulessBedford Independent School DistrictGA1 The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment This article has been reviewed as part of WikipediaWikiProject Good articlesProject quality task force in an effort to ensure all listed Good articles continue to meet the Good article criteria In reviewing the article I have found there are some issues that may need to be addressed listed below I will check back in seven days If these issues are addressed the article will remain listed as a Good article Otherwise it may be delisted such a decision may be challenged through WPGAR If improved after it has been delisted it may be nominated at WPGAN Feel free to drop a message on my talk page if you have any questions and many thanks for all the hard work that has gone into this article thus farGA review see here for criteriaThis article fails primarily on WPLAYOUT there are far to many embedded lists The whole article is really just a collection of lists with short sections of prose in between Even the Programs section is really little more than a list disguised as prose There are also major problems with the referencing there are a great number of dead links which I have marked and theres an unfortunate mix of inline references and external links in the textThis is just the tip of the iceberg I really dont think there is any way of saving this article without extensive work Still I will give it the normal week on hold please contact me if anybody decides to rewrite it   

