I never came across a rule that you cant use a source if its title and main point isnt reflected in the edit That would be very limiting However this is not to say that the material I added does not reflect these The authors discussion on the counteractive effects of cannabis is a major point Regardless what matters is that the details are relevant even if it doesnt summarize the source the only problem is that if they contradict the source Anyway since similar details are in the article I dont dispute the deletion However I would suggest that you define what you mean by beneficial to some users It does not seem to be very informative

    ####Prompt- Does the next message are offensives ? reply with a JSON object (without carriage return or new lines)
    with keys :
    isoffensive (True if it's offensive).
    This this the message : 
I never came across a rule that you cant use a source if its title and main point isnt reflected in the edit That would be very limiting However this is not to say that the material I added does not reflect these The authors discussion on the counteractive effects of cannabis is a major point Regardless what matters is that the details are relevant even if it doesnt summarize the source the only problem is that if they contradict the source Anyway since similar details are in the article I dont dispute the deletion However I would suggest that you define what you mean by beneficial to some users It does not seem to be very informative

