I dont think I follow your logic on this one Pcarbonn If we consider the Shkedi and Jones et al papers to be genuine academic papers then their findings can be included We should not elaborate any further than their authors do about their significance in the debate  We dont have a source saying why Fleischman left the field so it cant be included

    ####Prompt- Does the next message are offensives ? reply with a JSON object (without carriage return or new lines)
    with keys :
    isoffensive (True if it's offensive).
    This this the message : 
I dont think I follow your logic on this one Pcarbonn If we consider the Shkedi and Jones et al papers to be genuine academic papers then their findings can be included We should not elaborate any further than their authors do about their significance in the debate  We dont have a source saying why Fleischman left the field so it cant be included

