 Agreed I have most of my experience in book design mostly history of book design preGutenbergian period and do consider myself only vaguely familiar with web design But I understand that through history images have posed a problem to book designer If images exist there on the page in their own right and the page is as much an image as a carrier of the text the layout can be and usually is creative But in such towards written information and legibility orientated enterprises as wikipedia this is not a sensible approach Furthermore the images are only thumbs pointers and only full size image gives the full impression So I see no particular reason for playing around with incomplete images what serve only as reference marks   

    ####Prompt- Does the next message are offensives ? reply with a JSON object (without carriage return or new lines)
    with keys :
    isoffensive (True if it's offensive).
    This this the message : 
 Agreed I have most of my experience in book design mostly history of book design preGutenbergian period and do consider myself only vaguely familiar with web design But I understand that through history images have posed a problem to book designer If images exist there on the page in their own right and the page is as much an image as a carrier of the text the layout can be and usually is creative But in such towards written information and legibility orientated enterprises as wikipedia this is not a sensible approach Furthermore the images are only thumbs pointers and only full size image gives the full impression So I see no particular reason for playing around with incomplete images what serve only as reference marks   

