170º ElevationSo with the turret facing forward after the gun becomes completely vertical it can now swing to point literally backwards to form a 10º angle with the upper part of the rear of the vehicle That would be an almost ridiculous design for starters why would a 90º degree elevation be desirable at all Maybe someone thought the vehicle should be able to selfdestruct that way Obviously theres a mistake both in the article and the source The vehicle has a 70º elevation which seems more logical FOSS CHRISTOPHER F Janes Tanks and combat vehicles recognition guide 2ed Harper Collins 2000 pp432I believe the article should be corrected

    ####Prompt- Does the next message are offensives ? reply with a JSON object (without carriage return or new lines)
    with keys :
    isoffensive (True if it's offensive).
    This this the message : 
170º ElevationSo with the turret facing forward after the gun becomes completely vertical it can now swing to point literally backwards to form a 10º angle with the upper part of the rear of the vehicle That would be an almost ridiculous design for starters why would a 90º degree elevation be desirable at all Maybe someone thought the vehicle should be able to selfdestruct that way Obviously theres a mistake both in the article and the source The vehicle has a 70º elevation which seems more logical FOSS CHRISTOPHER F Janes Tanks and combat vehicles recognition guide 2ed Harper Collins 2000 pp432I believe the article should be corrected

