Hi Richard I agree that establishing some standard for the entries themselves is as important an issue as the one that everyone gravitated towards but I could only see consensus for or indeed significant discussion of the issue of concerning the permissibility of nonEnglish terms and since the discussion was effectively stalled I figure better the one issue resolved than nothing  Now that has been dealt with however participants in a new discussion will be able to focus more or less exclusively on the perentry criteria  I do not think anyone would look amiss on a new RfC addressing that specific issue at any time that you wish to take the time to reopen discussion upon it  Certainly I will be happy to participate  talk 

    ####Prompt- Does the next message are offensives ? reply with a JSON object (without carriage return or new lines)
    with keys :
    isoffensive (True if it's offensive).
    This this the message : 
Hi Richard I agree that establishing some standard for the entries themselves is as important an issue as the one that everyone gravitated towards but I could only see consensus for or indeed significant discussion of the issue of concerning the permissibility of nonEnglish terms and since the discussion was effectively stalled I figure better the one issue resolved than nothing  Now that has been dealt with however participants in a new discussion will be able to focus more or less exclusively on the perentry criteria  I do not think anyone would look amiss on a new RfC addressing that specific issue at any time that you wish to take the time to reopen discussion upon it  Certainly I will be happy to participate  talk 

