You said that according to Lawson and Sloane Resolution 567 referred to selfdetermination as a minority in a nationstate  The link I provided to the resolution shows that it says no such thing and Lawson and Sloane do not make that claim  Perhaps you were confusing the resolution with something else  And I did not say a territory cannot exist in a nationstate or a federal republic  Clearly it can as an incorporated territory  Both Canada and Australia have incorporated territories for example  Although they are not technically republics  Obviously if a country has territories it will exercise some degree of jurisdiction over them and may allow them some degree of selfgovernment but that does not incorporate them    

    ####Prompt- Does the next message are offensives ? reply with a JSON object (without carriage return or new lines)
    with keys :
    isoffensive (True if it's offensive).
    This this the message : 
You said that according to Lawson and Sloane Resolution 567 referred to selfdetermination as a minority in a nationstate  The link I provided to the resolution shows that it says no such thing and Lawson and Sloane do not make that claim  Perhaps you were confusing the resolution with something else  And I did not say a territory cannot exist in a nationstate or a federal republic  Clearly it can as an incorporated territory  Both Canada and Australia have incorporated territories for example  Although they are not technically republics  Obviously if a country has territories it will exercise some degree of jurisdiction over them and may allow them some degree of selfgovernment but that does not incorporate them    

