 some advice hi Hboetes   You are new here and you dont understand the rules very well much less the spirit that informs them  it is very very unwise to jump straight into a heated dispute as you are doing on the Michael Greger article  Per the notice above you are edit warring and if you continue doing that you are going to drive right over a cliff and get blocked  So really  my advice to you is slow down and learn how we operate and really learn  Ask questions about the relevant wikipedia policies and guidelines that govern our contentI am sorry about this but if you really want to get involved it turns out that Wikipedia is a pretty complex place  Being an encyclopedia that anyone can edit means that over the years Wikipedia has developed lots of policies and guidelines PAG to help provide a body of law as it were that form a foundation for rational discussion  Without that foundation this place would be a wild west   a truly ugly place where people would just make shit up about why some content should or should not be in an article and it would devolve into a bar room brawl   But with the foundation there are ways to rationally work things out  if and only if all the parties involved accept that foundation and work within it  One of the hardest things for new people is to understand not only that this foundation exists but what its letter and spirit is I keep emphasizing the spirit because too often people fall prey to what we call wikilawyering   The more I have learned about how things are set up here  not just the letter of PAG and the various drama boards and administrative tools but their spirit   the more impressed I have become at how well  beautiful this place is   It takes time to learn both the spirit and the letter of PAG and to really get aligned with Wikipedias mission to crowdsource a reliable NPOV source of information for the public as reliable and NPOV are defined in PAG   People come edit for many reasons but one of the main ones is that they are passionate about something  That passion is a doubleedged sword  It drives people to contribute which has the potential for productive construction but it can also lead to WPTENDENTIOUS editing which is really destructive  WPADVOCACY is one of our biggest bedevilments So dont edit war  discuss on the talk page Ask authentic questions not rhetorical ones about what policies and guidelines are relevant to the content you care about  good luck   

    ####Prompt- Does the next message are offensives ? reply with a JSON object (without carriage return or new lines)
    with keys :
    isoffensive (True if it's offensive).
    This this the message : 
 some advice hi Hboetes   You are new here and you dont understand the rules very well much less the spirit that informs them  it is very very unwise to jump straight into a heated dispute as you are doing on the Michael Greger article  Per the notice above you are edit warring and if you continue doing that you are going to drive right over a cliff and get blocked  So really  my advice to you is slow down and learn how we operate and really learn  Ask questions about the relevant wikipedia policies and guidelines that govern our contentI am sorry about this but if you really want to get involved it turns out that Wikipedia is a pretty complex place  Being an encyclopedia that anyone can edit means that over the years Wikipedia has developed lots of policies and guidelines PAG to help provide a body of law as it were that form a foundation for rational discussion  Without that foundation this place would be a wild west   a truly ugly place where people would just make shit up about why some content should or should not be in an article and it would devolve into a bar room brawl   But with the foundation there are ways to rationally work things out  if and only if all the parties involved accept that foundation and work within it  One of the hardest things for new people is to understand not only that this foundation exists but what its letter and spirit is I keep emphasizing the spirit because too often people fall prey to what we call wikilawyering   The more I have learned about how things are set up here  not just the letter of PAG and the various drama boards and administrative tools but their spirit   the more impressed I have become at how well  beautiful this place is   It takes time to learn both the spirit and the letter of PAG and to really get aligned with Wikipedias mission to crowdsource a reliable NPOV source of information for the public as reliable and NPOV are defined in PAG   People come edit for many reasons but one of the main ones is that they are passionate about something  That passion is a doubleedged sword  It drives people to contribute which has the potential for productive construction but it can also lead to WPTENDENTIOUS editing which is really destructive  WPADVOCACY is one of our biggest bedevilments So dont edit war  discuss on the talk page Ask authentic questions not rhetorical ones about what policies and guidelines are relevant to the content you care about  good luck   

