 Operation Northwords Listing Operation Northwoods as a conspiracy theory is bias and unfounded by the very definition of Conspiracy Theory that this article gives If a conspiracy theory is a theory involving a coordinated group which is or was secretly working to commit illegal or wrongful actions including attempting to hide the existence of the group and its activities then Operation Northwoods does not fit the criteria First of all the CIA does not try to keep its self hidden or secret It is a known agency and the plans of Operation Northwoods are no more a Conspiracy Theory just because they where kept secret then any of its other actions that the CIA plans or performs on a daily basses that are all kept secret from the general public Secondly Operation Northwoods was not a conspiracy within the CIA either Not one CIA member kept it a secret from anyone who should have known about it It other words the protocols and the chain of command for this plan was followed precisely as they should have been And because of that fact it was shot down the architect of the plan was fired the plan never took action and it was well documented which is why we know of the plan under the Freedom of Information Act This is the exact opposite of a conspiracy theory    Conspiracism The section conspiracism saysConspiracy theories are often not taken seriously because so many conspiracy theories  almost by definition  lack readily verifiable evidence This phrase is unnecessary to introduce conspiracism and is full of weasel words often taken not seriously has anybody made a statistic many conspiracy theories lack verifiable evidence how many and it happens almost by  definition what in the definition states tht the theory has to lack evidence  If nobody has nothing to comment about that I will delete the sentence above  I disagree with the above sentence  and for sure it is not neutral but  guess that it meant that the conspiracy groups hides the evidents andor create them vide the 911 passport I dont want to argue was it fabricated  I mentioning that accorsing to some people it was fabricated    Sequence of sections and bias The way this article is set up suggests a very very strong POV and it is not even really attempting to be neutral First problem is the examples for one they shouldnt be the second thing since its mainly a partial list This should be towards the end of the article Also there is the descriptionsThe John F Kennedy assassination was a plot by people in high places and not the work of lone gunman Lee Harvey Oswald Oliver Stones film JFK is based on this premiseWhile this is a conspiracy theory one I think is somewhat likely it is actually the most extreme of conspiracy theories in this regard Other theories were that this was a mob hit or carried out by Cuba or the Soviets The UFO conspiracy theory is also stated in the more extreme manner Some theories are that the US government conceals an alien presence because theyre afraid of it causing a scare which sounds more reasonable than to be used for war and other ideas mainly towards the New World orderAlso the fourth section is almost completely dedicated to explaining conspiracy theories in a discrediting manner treating them like psychological abnormalities or attempts by confused individuals to make sense of a nonsensical world It seems to be the most common and most annoying criticism of conspiracy theories This section also is half of the actual article with the rest mainly being an explanation of the terminology and even mentions of fictional conspiracies Very little of this article goes to treating conspiracy theories as a justifiable practice in critical thinking that like all legitimate studies can lead to rather ridiculous theories For instance there are legitimate questions about 911 such as the 100000 given to Atta by a head of the ISI There are also allegations that the 911 Commission due to its structure and the associations of its head with the Administration was unable to do a thorough and independent investigation with it ultimately being little more than a coverup In every case critical thinking demands some form of explanation or theory for such facts For instance one is that the Administration is trying to cover up connections between Pakistan andor Saudi Arabia and 911 This w

    ####Prompt- Does the next message are offensives ? reply with a JSON object (without carriage return or new lines)
    with keys :
    isoffensive (True if it's offensive).
    This this the message : 
 Operation Northwords Listing Operation Northwoods as a conspiracy theory is bias and unfounded by the very definition of Conspiracy Theory that this article gives If a conspiracy theory is a theory involving a coordinated group which is or was secretly working to commit illegal or wrongful actions including attempting to hide the existence of the group and its activities then Operation Northwoods does not fit the criteria First of all the CIA does not try to keep its self hidden or secret It is a known agency and the plans of Operation Northwoods are no more a Conspiracy Theory just because they where kept secret then any of its other actions that the CIA plans or performs on a daily basses that are all kept secret from the general public Secondly Operation Northwoods was not a conspiracy within the CIA either Not one CIA member kept it a secret from anyone who should have known about it It other words the protocols and the chain of command for this plan was followed precisely as they should have been And because of that fact it was shot down the architect of the plan was fired the plan never took action and it was well documented which is why we know of the plan under the Freedom of Information Act This is the exact opposite of a conspiracy theory    Conspiracism The section conspiracism saysConspiracy theories are often not taken seriously because so many conspiracy theories  almost by definition  lack readily verifiable evidence This phrase is unnecessary to introduce conspiracism and is full of weasel words often taken not seriously has anybody made a statistic many conspiracy theories lack verifiable evidence how many and it happens almost by  definition what in the definition states tht the theory has to lack evidence  If nobody has nothing to comment about that I will delete the sentence above  I disagree with the above sentence  and for sure it is not neutral but  guess that it meant that the conspiracy groups hides the evidents andor create them vide the 911 passport I dont want to argue was it fabricated  I mentioning that accorsing to some people it was fabricated    Sequence of sections and bias The way this article is set up suggests a very very strong POV and it is not even really attempting to be neutral First problem is the examples for one they shouldnt be the second thing since its mainly a partial list This should be towards the end of the article Also there is the descriptionsThe John F Kennedy assassination was a plot by people in high places and not the work of lone gunman Lee Harvey Oswald Oliver Stones film JFK is based on this premiseWhile this is a conspiracy theory one I think is somewhat likely it is actually the most extreme of conspiracy theories in this regard Other theories were that this was a mob hit or carried out by Cuba or the Soviets The UFO conspiracy theory is also stated in the more extreme manner Some theories are that the US government conceals an alien presence because theyre afraid of it causing a scare which sounds more reasonable than to be used for war and other ideas mainly towards the New World orderAlso the fourth section is almost completely dedicated to explaining conspiracy theories in a discrediting manner treating them like psychological abnormalities or attempts by confused individuals to make sense of a nonsensical world It seems to be the most common and most annoying criticism of conspiracy theories This section also is half of the actual article with the rest mainly being an explanation of the terminology and even mentions of fictional conspiracies Very little of this article goes to treating conspiracy theories as a justifiable practice in critical thinking that like all legitimate studies can lead to rather ridiculous theories For instance there are legitimate questions about 911 such as the 100000 given to Atta by a head of the ISI There are also allegations that the 911 Commission due to its structure and the associations of its head with the Administration was unable to do a thorough and independent investigation with it ultimately being little more than a coverup In every case critical thinking demands some form of explanation or theory for such facts For instance one is that the Administration is trying to cover up connections between Pakistan andor Saudi Arabia and 911 This w

