Thanks for your feedback Orderinchaos I dont consider it rambunctious to remove material that presently lacks consensus and is factually misleading Howard did not contest the 1987 as Prime Minister if anything the election would be more appropriate listed under Member of Parliament I agree that robust talkpage discussion needs to take place and that this appears to be happening While it does nonconsensual content should remain off the article especially that which is misleading   contribs  

    ####Prompt- Does the next message are offensives ? reply with a JSON object (without carriage return or new lines)
    with keys :
    isoffensive (True if it's offensive).
    This this the message : 
Thanks for your feedback Orderinchaos I dont consider it rambunctious to remove material that presently lacks consensus and is factually misleading Howard did not contest the 1987 as Prime Minister if anything the election would be more appropriate listed under Member of Parliament I agree that robust talkpage discussion needs to take place and that this appears to be happening While it does nonconsensual content should remain off the article especially that which is misleading   contribs  

