And you and I have a different notion of both context and succinctness  What youre recommended is context beyond the photo  not to draw the reader in  but for other purposes youve mentioned before  I believe that failing to remove the photographs you want to include large disclaimers to ensure these photos are interpreted from the context of Gates innocence The article does that very well already and Im not in agreement that we need to duplicate that so verbosely in the captions I think the porch photo caption does a reasonable job and the booking photo already does a very good job perhaps too good for your tastes of drawing the in the reader And again if you examine the Rosa Parks booking photo it also has a very succinct caption  I dont see you changing that caption so I suspect your agenda not in the true spirit of WikipediaCAPTIONSDrawingthereaderintothearticle

    ####Prompt- Does the next message are offensives ? reply with a JSON object (without carriage return or new lines)
    with keys :
    isoffensive (True if it's offensive).
    This this the message : 
And you and I have a different notion of both context and succinctness  What youre recommended is context beyond the photo  not to draw the reader in  but for other purposes youve mentioned before  I believe that failing to remove the photographs you want to include large disclaimers to ensure these photos are interpreted from the context of Gates innocence The article does that very well already and Im not in agreement that we need to duplicate that so verbosely in the captions I think the porch photo caption does a reasonable job and the booking photo already does a very good job perhaps too good for your tastes of drawing the in the reader And again if you examine the Rosa Parks booking photo it also has a very succinct caption  I dont see you changing that caption so I suspect your agenda not in the true spirit of WikipediaCAPTIONSDrawingthereaderintothearticle

