Hyperboreans and StonehengeThis article is not about Hyperborenas or about Stonehenge Long writings on these topics are irrelevant for this article I have therefore reverted the additions talking about Stonehenge and Hyperboreans OpenFuture talk I agree that most of this edit reads like speculation and original research or synthesis However the reference looks reasonable I havent consulted it directly but have looked at the series of papers from this and other conferences and I have no reason to think theres anything unreliable about it Ive reinserted what I think could reasonably be attributed to the conference paper Kim DentBrown Talk This article is a shambles and needs a full rewriting  Preceding unsigned comment added by Stavgard talk  contribs  Stavgard talk This comes from the article in Fornvännen 1983 1This article was edited and approved by the previous editor of Fornvännen Fil Dr JanPeder Lamm Fornvännen is a highly reputable magazine Stavgard talk JanPeder Lamm born 27 October 1935 is a Swedish archaeologist He received his PhD in 1973 from the University of Stockholm for a dissertation about a Migration Period elite cemetery near DrottningholmLamm taught archaeology at the University of Stockholm in the 1970s and then worked until retirement as Head Curator for the Swedish Iron Age at the Museum of National Antiquities in Stockholm He is a member of the editorial board behind the journal Fornvännen and has taken active part in the Helgö project since the 1960s Stavgard talk I fully agree It does not belong under the heading Grooves It belongs under the heading Astronomical calendars on Gotland However the heading Grooves needs a full rewriteStavgard talk

    ####Prompt- Does the next message are offensives ? reply with a JSON object (without carriage return or new lines)
    with keys :
    isoffensive (True if it's offensive).
    This this the message : 
Hyperboreans and StonehengeThis article is not about Hyperborenas or about Stonehenge Long writings on these topics are irrelevant for this article I have therefore reverted the additions talking about Stonehenge and Hyperboreans OpenFuture talk I agree that most of this edit reads like speculation and original research or synthesis However the reference looks reasonable I havent consulted it directly but have looked at the series of papers from this and other conferences and I have no reason to think theres anything unreliable about it Ive reinserted what I think could reasonably be attributed to the conference paper Kim DentBrown Talk This article is a shambles and needs a full rewriting  Preceding unsigned comment added by Stavgard talk  contribs  Stavgard talk This comes from the article in Fornvännen 1983 1This article was edited and approved by the previous editor of Fornvännen Fil Dr JanPeder Lamm Fornvännen is a highly reputable magazine Stavgard talk JanPeder Lamm born 27 October 1935 is a Swedish archaeologist He received his PhD in 1973 from the University of Stockholm for a dissertation about a Migration Period elite cemetery near DrottningholmLamm taught archaeology at the University of Stockholm in the 1970s and then worked until retirement as Head Curator for the Swedish Iron Age at the Museum of National Antiquities in Stockholm He is a member of the editorial board behind the journal Fornvännen and has taken active part in the Helgö project since the 1960s Stavgard talk I fully agree It does not belong under the heading Grooves It belongs under the heading Astronomical calendars on Gotland However the heading Grooves needs a full rewriteStavgard talk

