 I think having wikipedia in here sounds like a good idea at least because it seems to me that wikipedia is a very wellknown example of free culture That wikipedia is a part of free culture should be pretty selfapparent from the way its defined in the article social movements that promote the freedom to distribute and modify creative works using the Internet as well as other media and from the license used The selfreferencing seems ok as the text says that writing about wikipedia is ok where its relevant If wikipedia is an example of online free culture then its relevant As for wikipedia not using copyrighted material without permission I dont see that as any stranger than FLOSS not gobbling up proprietary software Free culture things are things that let you copy distribute and modify them Proprietary things generally dont and so using them without permission isnt allowed and therefore you cant include them in free culture things and have the free culture things remain free or even legal If you want to use copyrighted pictures and such on wikipedia it seems to me that is to ask the owner to change the license or at least follow fair usage guidelines   

    ####Prompt- Does the next message are offensives ? reply with a JSON object (without carriage return or new lines)
    with keys :
    isoffensive (True if it's offensive).
    This this the message : 
 I think having wikipedia in here sounds like a good idea at least because it seems to me that wikipedia is a very wellknown example of free culture That wikipedia is a part of free culture should be pretty selfapparent from the way its defined in the article social movements that promote the freedom to distribute and modify creative works using the Internet as well as other media and from the license used The selfreferencing seems ok as the text says that writing about wikipedia is ok where its relevant If wikipedia is an example of online free culture then its relevant As for wikipedia not using copyrighted material without permission I dont see that as any stranger than FLOSS not gobbling up proprietary software Free culture things are things that let you copy distribute and modify them Proprietary things generally dont and so using them without permission isnt allowed and therefore you cant include them in free culture things and have the free culture things remain free or even legal If you want to use copyrighted pictures and such on wikipedia it seems to me that is to ask the owner to change the license or at least follow fair usage guidelines   

