TfD nomination of TemplateVideo TemplateVideo has been nominated for deletion You are invited to comment at WikipediaTemplatesfordeletionTemplateVideo the discussion at the templates entry on the Templates for Deletion page The nominator Chris CunninghamUserThumperward removed the template from all the articles and then nominated it for deletion This is a wellknown WikipediaOwnership gambit by stealth removing a feature with mass edits and then claiming its not used as a reason for deletion  He then reverted my attempt to keep the video template on an article page at least until the deletion discussion is completed This prevents editors from making any comparisons on the technical merits of the template which further forces you to accept his ownership of articles presenting videos I have requested a Speedy Keep due to his unconsensed mass edits until there can be an informed and unowned editorial discussion on the technical merits Until he again rereverts you can at least temporarily revert his edit to see what the video template looked like and then consider the technical issues on their merits which are described at the template deletion discussion

    ####Prompt- Does the next message are offensives ? reply with a JSON object (without carriage return or new lines)
    with keys :
    isoffensive (True if it's offensive).
    This this the message : 
TfD nomination of TemplateVideo TemplateVideo has been nominated for deletion You are invited to comment at WikipediaTemplatesfordeletionTemplateVideo the discussion at the templates entry on the Templates for Deletion page The nominator Chris CunninghamUserThumperward removed the template from all the articles and then nominated it for deletion This is a wellknown WikipediaOwnership gambit by stealth removing a feature with mass edits and then claiming its not used as a reason for deletion  He then reverted my attempt to keep the video template on an article page at least until the deletion discussion is completed This prevents editors from making any comparisons on the technical merits of the template which further forces you to accept his ownership of articles presenting videos I have requested a Speedy Keep due to his unconsensed mass edits until there can be an informed and unowned editorial discussion on the technical merits Until he again rereverts you can at least temporarily revert his edit to see what the video template looked like and then consider the technical issues on their merits which are described at the template deletion discussion

