First if you create obviously bogus claims nobody needs to waste his time refuting the claim as applied to each excerpt you cut and paste  One refutation is more than sufficient  Second your rationales appear to be shifting  Originally you claimed that the article contained creative facts and POV statements  Now you claim that a particular statement is unverifiable  Be very specific about what you find problematic citing the specific Wikipedia policy  Given your contentious history with this article dating back over a year it is evident that your goal is to portray the eXile as an uncredible source  I believe you will reject any claims that undermine this premise regardless of their consistency with Wikipedia policy  Consequently if you want to be taken seriously you need act cooperatively to resolve issues  This means being specific in your complaints citing the exact policy  This means no specious claims  And this means accepting the article as undisputed if you dont have any specific issues  Can you abide by these conditions   

    ####Prompt- Does the next message are offensives ? reply with a JSON object (without carriage return or new lines)
    with keys :
    isoffensive (True if it's offensive).
    This this the message : 
First if you create obviously bogus claims nobody needs to waste his time refuting the claim as applied to each excerpt you cut and paste  One refutation is more than sufficient  Second your rationales appear to be shifting  Originally you claimed that the article contained creative facts and POV statements  Now you claim that a particular statement is unverifiable  Be very specific about what you find problematic citing the specific Wikipedia policy  Given your contentious history with this article dating back over a year it is evident that your goal is to portray the eXile as an uncredible source  I believe you will reject any claims that undermine this premise regardless of their consistency with Wikipedia policy  Consequently if you want to be taken seriously you need act cooperatively to resolve issues  This means being specific in your complaints citing the exact policy  This means no specious claims  And this means accepting the article as undisputed if you dont have any specific issues  Can you abide by these conditions   

