Mr TanthalasPlease help me understand  You were not involved in teh talk discussions and edits I completed after learning Kuru stated my entry was promotional  So what refernce and evidence did you use to block my edit access and state my comments were unwarranted harrassment  I do not want to appear argumentative and certainly want to comply with the rules of Wiki  You also refered to my act as vandalism which I think is harsh and unwarratnted  If you check with Mr Kuru I think he will tell you were were having a legitamit discussion and my edits subsequent with his deletion were inetnded to comply with his request to remove promotional material  I simply subsequently loaded a link to the approved patent on the USPTO patent site  It provides substantial reference teh approved business method patent prior art abstracta nd claims  I think your actions were premature and showed you lacked informationa bout what was being discussed between Kuru and I  I would still like to refernce the patent and since it had previously been done and sanctioned acceptable because it was on teh site undisturbed for 2 months I think this has merit  I do see the fact that my name as teh inventor tends to promote thepatent  However if you check I am not the owner  It is owned by Ultimate Claim Solution Inc  My refernce also tried to explain that aspect  Non the less this all could have been avoided  When someones content is deleted the person making thatd elrtion should point out in there csignature they are an administrtor or moderator  Had Kuro done that I would have talked to him first instead of trying to update the edit to what I thought ws not promotional and then trying to engage in talk with Mr Kuru  Lastly I respectfully request you release the block  I aslo request that I be given permission to return the article to the annonomus post which refernced the patent  Those observing will not note that I am ihe inventor  It is not promotion simply good refernce and citation  The insuarnec industry is apposed to patents and there are many executives who beive it should be open forum programming and business method patents are not unique inventions  The USPTO thinks otherwise  My patent was approved  I look forwared to your resonse

    ####Prompt- Does the next message are offensives ? reply with a JSON object (without carriage return or new lines)
    with keys :
    isoffensive (True if it's offensive).
    This this the message : 
Mr TanthalasPlease help me understand  You were not involved in teh talk discussions and edits I completed after learning Kuru stated my entry was promotional  So what refernce and evidence did you use to block my edit access and state my comments were unwarranted harrassment  I do not want to appear argumentative and certainly want to comply with the rules of Wiki  You also refered to my act as vandalism which I think is harsh and unwarratnted  If you check with Mr Kuru I think he will tell you were were having a legitamit discussion and my edits subsequent with his deletion were inetnded to comply with his request to remove promotional material  I simply subsequently loaded a link to the approved patent on the USPTO patent site  It provides substantial reference teh approved business method patent prior art abstracta nd claims  I think your actions were premature and showed you lacked informationa bout what was being discussed between Kuru and I  I would still like to refernce the patent and since it had previously been done and sanctioned acceptable because it was on teh site undisturbed for 2 months I think this has merit  I do see the fact that my name as teh inventor tends to promote thepatent  However if you check I am not the owner  It is owned by Ultimate Claim Solution Inc  My refernce also tried to explain that aspect  Non the less this all could have been avoided  When someones content is deleted the person making thatd elrtion should point out in there csignature they are an administrtor or moderator  Had Kuro done that I would have talked to him first instead of trying to update the edit to what I thought ws not promotional and then trying to engage in talk with Mr Kuru  Lastly I respectfully request you release the block  I aslo request that I be given permission to return the article to the annonomus post which refernced the patent  Those observing will not note that I am ihe inventor  It is not promotion simply good refernce and citation  The insuarnec industry is apposed to patents and there are many executives who beive it should be open forum programming and business method patents are not unique inventions  The USPTO thinks otherwise  My patent was approved  I look forwared to your resonse

