LO UK credits On hir talk page MelbourneStar has an exchange of messages in which she accepts that the credits for episodes of LO UK serve as sufficient sources to establish the relationship between the original LO episodes and their UK remakes There is no rational reason why those same credits do not serve as sufficient sourcing for the same information in this article MelbourneStar specifically and unequivocally states that no additional citation is needed when the credits of the UK episode state that the episode is based on a US episode Demanding additional sourcing on this article when she has already acknowledged that it is not necessary is irrational Please stop reverting the information in support of irrationality 7620489112   MelbourneStar has now stated on hir talk page that she is making this change in an attempt to prove a point about this article and similar articles 7620489112  Ah no Im clearly just saying once this is past Ill move back onto the bigger article which is LO UK Just because I say I agree does not mean I agree What I still find so hilarious is that youd rather violate 3RR and Personal Attack another User then going ahead with Consensus or providing a reliable source Youve done neither and to make things better Ill promise you that I wont leave until either is reached All quotations and any material challenged or likely to be challenged must be attributed to a reliable published source using an inline citation  WikipediaVerifiabilityWikipedia does not publish original thought all material in Wikipedia must be attributable to a reliable published source  WPORWikipedia articles should be based on reliable published secondary sources and to a lesser extent on tertiary sources Secondary or tertiary sources are needed to establish the topics notability and to avoid novel interpretations of primary sources though primary sources are permitted if used carefully All interpretive claims analyses or synthetic claims about primary sources must be referenced to a secondary source rather than original analysis of the primarysource material by Wikipedia editors  WPORDo not base articles entirely on primary sources  WPOR I may have accepted the credits on the LO UK article before I took a read of this   talk to me  

    ####Prompt- Does the next message are offensives ? reply with a JSON object (without carriage return or new lines)
    with keys :
    isoffensive (True if it's offensive).
    This this the message : 
LO UK credits On hir talk page MelbourneStar has an exchange of messages in which she accepts that the credits for episodes of LO UK serve as sufficient sources to establish the relationship between the original LO episodes and their UK remakes There is no rational reason why those same credits do not serve as sufficient sourcing for the same information in this article MelbourneStar specifically and unequivocally states that no additional citation is needed when the credits of the UK episode state that the episode is based on a US episode Demanding additional sourcing on this article when she has already acknowledged that it is not necessary is irrational Please stop reverting the information in support of irrationality 7620489112   MelbourneStar has now stated on hir talk page that she is making this change in an attempt to prove a point about this article and similar articles 7620489112  Ah no Im clearly just saying once this is past Ill move back onto the bigger article which is LO UK Just because I say I agree does not mean I agree What I still find so hilarious is that youd rather violate 3RR and Personal Attack another User then going ahead with Consensus or providing a reliable source Youve done neither and to make things better Ill promise you that I wont leave until either is reached All quotations and any material challenged or likely to be challenged must be attributed to a reliable published source using an inline citation  WikipediaVerifiabilityWikipedia does not publish original thought all material in Wikipedia must be attributable to a reliable published source  WPORWikipedia articles should be based on reliable published secondary sources and to a lesser extent on tertiary sources Secondary or tertiary sources are needed to establish the topics notability and to avoid novel interpretations of primary sources though primary sources are permitted if used carefully All interpretive claims analyses or synthetic claims about primary sources must be referenced to a secondary source rather than original analysis of the primarysource material by Wikipedia editors  WPORDo not base articles entirely on primary sources  WPOR I may have accepted the credits on the LO UK article before I took a read of this   talk to me  

