I feel bad too JG I know I can have a real smart sarcastic mouth when I get totally frustrated and when it gets going look out I apologize Seriously I dont want bad blood between usI do have a POV of course We all do But in an entry that is explaining the traditionalist POV where there is the trad POV it matches And when it comes to external linksfurther reading not sources then traditionalist websites deserve to be represented as much as others I mean on a page on Hannukah there might be a link to An Orthodox Hannukah or Reformed Readings for Hannukah but with Dominick it seems to be only his way or no way He cant add a link for balance or add a traditional Catholic site tag or group links under headings as you did he removes and replaces and mischaracterizes in the edit summariesI am totally fine with any links to my site being labelled a traditional Catholic site or what not though I think the same thing ought to work in the other direction such that EWTN for ex is labelled a conservative or neoconservative site  not that I am worked up about going through Wiki and making it so but the point remains Im glad you liked at least most of the page on the Rosary I think if you looked at the links mentioned in my RfC you will actually like them too  at least most of them Seriously check this section of the site out and the subsections inside of it like the Customs of the Liturgical Year section There is nothing like it out there on the Net and Im not finished yet But your words show the key differences between traditionalists and conservativesneoconservatives you use the phrase attacks on Pope John Paul II with regard to the footnote about trads opinions that changing the Mysteries of the Rosary was unwise but we dont see it as an attack but a criticism Even St Paul himself resisted St Peter our first Pope to the face when His Holiness did an unwise thing Galatians 2 and St Catherine of Siena used to write letters to the Pope basically telling him to act like a man LOL Our differences pretty much come down to different understandings of infallibility to perceptions of our ability to criticize and resist prudential pastoral decisions and to our different notions of Christian obedience and here different trads have different opinions as to what should be obeyed or rightfully resisted because that is a prudential concern in itself one that each Catholic has to study and pray aboutBut no matter whether you and Dominick and I agree or not we dont have to agree to be decent to each other and some of my favorite people are conservative Catholics there is a trad movement out there and we have as much right to be heard as anyone else Or imagine that were not even Catholic at all and theres a page on the Rosary no one would remove a link to Anglican Rosary practices I just feel as if the traditional viewpoint is being censored and it frustrates me it doubly frustrates me when links like this arent only removed but are labelled blog or monographmonographs Its beyond belief really that he is allowed to get away with itI will promise you this from here on out if I add any links to the site only on relevant pages of course I will use the word a traditional Catholic site or some such after it or will group links so that the fact that it is a trad site is clear If I come across any older links that have already been added and not all have been added by me BTW I will edit to do the same Sound good I am glad you wrote I feel TONS better already  

    ####Prompt- Does the next message are offensives ? reply with a JSON object (without carriage return or new lines)
    with keys :
    isoffensive (True if it's offensive).
    This this the message : 
I feel bad too JG I know I can have a real smart sarcastic mouth when I get totally frustrated and when it gets going look out I apologize Seriously I dont want bad blood between usI do have a POV of course We all do But in an entry that is explaining the traditionalist POV where there is the trad POV it matches And when it comes to external linksfurther reading not sources then traditionalist websites deserve to be represented as much as others I mean on a page on Hannukah there might be a link to An Orthodox Hannukah or Reformed Readings for Hannukah but with Dominick it seems to be only his way or no way He cant add a link for balance or add a traditional Catholic site tag or group links under headings as you did he removes and replaces and mischaracterizes in the edit summariesI am totally fine with any links to my site being labelled a traditional Catholic site or what not though I think the same thing ought to work in the other direction such that EWTN for ex is labelled a conservative or neoconservative site  not that I am worked up about going through Wiki and making it so but the point remains Im glad you liked at least most of the page on the Rosary I think if you looked at the links mentioned in my RfC you will actually like them too  at least most of them Seriously check this section of the site out and the subsections inside of it like the Customs of the Liturgical Year section There is nothing like it out there on the Net and Im not finished yet But your words show the key differences between traditionalists and conservativesneoconservatives you use the phrase attacks on Pope John Paul II with regard to the footnote about trads opinions that changing the Mysteries of the Rosary was unwise but we dont see it as an attack but a criticism Even St Paul himself resisted St Peter our first Pope to the face when His Holiness did an unwise thing Galatians 2 and St Catherine of Siena used to write letters to the Pope basically telling him to act like a man LOL Our differences pretty much come down to different understandings of infallibility to perceptions of our ability to criticize and resist prudential pastoral decisions and to our different notions of Christian obedience and here different trads have different opinions as to what should be obeyed or rightfully resisted because that is a prudential concern in itself one that each Catholic has to study and pray aboutBut no matter whether you and Dominick and I agree or not we dont have to agree to be decent to each other and some of my favorite people are conservative Catholics there is a trad movement out there and we have as much right to be heard as anyone else Or imagine that were not even Catholic at all and theres a page on the Rosary no one would remove a link to Anglican Rosary practices I just feel as if the traditional viewpoint is being censored and it frustrates me it doubly frustrates me when links like this arent only removed but are labelled blog or monographmonographs Its beyond belief really that he is allowed to get away with itI will promise you this from here on out if I add any links to the site only on relevant pages of course I will use the word a traditional Catholic site or some such after it or will group links so that the fact that it is a trad site is clear If I come across any older links that have already been added and not all have been added by me BTW I will edit to do the same Sound good I am glad you wrote I feel TONS better already  

