Here are violations you have done here WP3RR WPAGF WPCIVIL WPPOINT WPTHREAT No Personal Attack You must read the article again especially the intro Defrauding people of money is presumably the most common type of fraud but there have also been many fraudulent discoveries in art archaeology and science  The latter two fields are distinctly separate even thought archeoology is a kind of social science scholarly it belongs to anthropology and history Fujimura is an archaeologist so that his case has been a good example of the archaeological fraud Therefore you shouldve provided a good rationale for your removal of the perfect example from the article Rather you insist on replacing it with Korean example in order to retaliate against my revert You also placed the new addition at the top of the section and the placement is very odd because if you really want to compromise with me you shouldve made a group to Fujimura the other archaeological case and the science case You think Hwang Wooseok case is more notable and I think Fujimura is more notable so we disagree on the point Besides google search result is sometimes deceptive and it is also funny that Japanese editors strongly disagreed to reflect the method at Dokdo and Sea of Japan hmm double standardIn addition you blatantly lie that I erased your addition and dont want it to be included Your threats and personal attacks truly degrade your reputation and credibility I dont wonder where you get the idea to request for arbitration before WPANI or WPRFC that is two step forward because I saw the same agenda at 2channel board They talk that Im the only one to defy against alterations by 2channel theyre many here with socksmeats such as the poll at TalkSea of Japan2channel meatpuppets from 朝鮮人のWikipediaｳｨｷﾍﾟﾃﾞｨｱ捏造に対抗せよ 21 You also should keep in mind that who has been altering information based on antisentiment and bias so dont produce untruthful comments on me any more Youre not a neutral editor but prove yourself higly uncivil and nonKorean editor for Japanese sake In my memory I have not added anything to articles related to ancient history of Japan but restored your friends blanking without discussion or rationale Here is English Wikipedia so unnecessary POV and undue addition of Japanese names is not needed on articles It is so clear that youre editing unfair in the rude manner  

    ####Prompt- Does the next message are offensives ? reply with a JSON object (without carriage return or new lines)
    with keys :
    isoffensive (True if it's offensive).
    This this the message : 
Here are violations you have done here WP3RR WPAGF WPCIVIL WPPOINT WPTHREAT No Personal Attack You must read the article again especially the intro Defrauding people of money is presumably the most common type of fraud but there have also been many fraudulent discoveries in art archaeology and science  The latter two fields are distinctly separate even thought archeoology is a kind of social science scholarly it belongs to anthropology and history Fujimura is an archaeologist so that his case has been a good example of the archaeological fraud Therefore you shouldve provided a good rationale for your removal of the perfect example from the article Rather you insist on replacing it with Korean example in order to retaliate against my revert You also placed the new addition at the top of the section and the placement is very odd because if you really want to compromise with me you shouldve made a group to Fujimura the other archaeological case and the science case You think Hwang Wooseok case is more notable and I think Fujimura is more notable so we disagree on the point Besides google search result is sometimes deceptive and it is also funny that Japanese editors strongly disagreed to reflect the method at Dokdo and Sea of Japan hmm double standardIn addition you blatantly lie that I erased your addition and dont want it to be included Your threats and personal attacks truly degrade your reputation and credibility I dont wonder where you get the idea to request for arbitration before WPANI or WPRFC that is two step forward because I saw the same agenda at 2channel board They talk that Im the only one to defy against alterations by 2channel theyre many here with socksmeats such as the poll at TalkSea of Japan2channel meatpuppets from 朝鮮人のWikipediaｳｨｷﾍﾟﾃﾞｨｱ捏造に対抗せよ 21 You also should keep in mind that who has been altering information based on antisentiment and bias so dont produce untruthful comments on me any more Youre not a neutral editor but prove yourself higly uncivil and nonKorean editor for Japanese sake In my memory I have not added anything to articles related to ancient history of Japan but restored your friends blanking without discussion or rationale Here is English Wikipedia so unnecessary POV and undue addition of Japanese names is not needed on articles It is so clear that youre editing unfair in the rude manner  

