Well as usual with Wikipedia these days its easier to just disengage  I feel like Im talking to a cult member who just keeps peppering their sentences with dogma phrases none of which quite make objective sense to a rational outsider If I request a move review Ill probably just get more of the same Its quite clear you were more interested in bureaucratic convenience and have minimal knowledge of chemical nomenclature never mind critiquing the clunky linguistics dreamt up in 2003 by a 14 year high school student from Hong Kong which was what we were trying to improve Also for someone whose interests include gender neutral language you have an amusing choice of user name    

    ####Prompt- Does the next message are offensives ? reply with a JSON object (without carriage return or new lines)
    with keys :
    isoffensive (True if it's offensive).
    This this the message : 
Well as usual with Wikipedia these days its easier to just disengage  I feel like Im talking to a cult member who just keeps peppering their sentences with dogma phrases none of which quite make objective sense to a rational outsider If I request a move review Ill probably just get more of the same Its quite clear you were more interested in bureaucratic convenience and have minimal knowledge of chemical nomenclature never mind critiquing the clunky linguistics dreamt up in 2003 by a 14 year high school student from Hong Kong which was what we were trying to improve Also for someone whose interests include gender neutral language you have an amusing choice of user name    

