  My numerous beefs with the templatePoor codingClearright is preferable to unnecessary line breaksa single textaligncenter is preferable to repeating needlessly aligncenter for every cellA width definition is preferable to margins and more commona cross wikipediathere is absolutely no need to have the comment be inserted in every page as it is specifically intended only for the template pageThere is no apparent reason to have a category in the template the category would be just as well put independantlyThe link in the header was misleading as implying an article limited to western Russia Unless Kremlin actually is but I doubt that and cant really tell anywayNo background color in the header unlike 90 of wikipedia footersPicture enlarging header unnecesssarily at the very least it should be reduced and move in the content section of the footer80 is unnecearily small for a simple footer like this Most wikipedia footers do very well with 90Now Id like to know why you reverted the entire thing including a totally legit categorization uunder categoryRussian navigational boxes instead of just adjusting what you werent happy with which appears to me to be only the comments location and the image  

    ####Prompt- Does the next message are offensives ? reply with a JSON object (without carriage return or new lines)
    with keys :
    isoffensive (True if it's offensive).
    This this the message : 
  My numerous beefs with the templatePoor codingClearright is preferable to unnecessary line breaksa single textaligncenter is preferable to repeating needlessly aligncenter for every cellA width definition is preferable to margins and more commona cross wikipediathere is absolutely no need to have the comment be inserted in every page as it is specifically intended only for the template pageThere is no apparent reason to have a category in the template the category would be just as well put independantlyThe link in the header was misleading as implying an article limited to western Russia Unless Kremlin actually is but I doubt that and cant really tell anywayNo background color in the header unlike 90 of wikipedia footersPicture enlarging header unnecesssarily at the very least it should be reduced and move in the content section of the footer80 is unnecearily small for a simple footer like this Most wikipedia footers do very well with 90Now Id like to know why you reverted the entire thing including a totally legit categorization uunder categoryRussian navigational boxes instead of just adjusting what you werent happy with which appears to me to be only the comments location and the image  

