I was merely pointing out that after numerous arbitrators had warned you to not accuse editors of pedophilia onwiki you reopened a discussion that had been closed because of allegations of pedophilia fine of promoting child pornography but it falls under the same category If you feel that that was throwing out the baby with the bathwater fair enough but I think it was irresponsible to reopen it without first dealing with the allegations I dont see how its abbetting someone making personal attacks to leave a prominent red box on the page with a note about how the remarks were completely inappropriate  Je vous invite à me parler 

    ####Prompt- Does the next message are offensives ? reply with a JSON object (without carriage return or new lines)
    with keys :
    isoffensive (True if it's offensive).
    This this the message : 
I was merely pointing out that after numerous arbitrators had warned you to not accuse editors of pedophilia onwiki you reopened a discussion that had been closed because of allegations of pedophilia fine of promoting child pornography but it falls under the same category If you feel that that was throwing out the baby with the bathwater fair enough but I think it was irresponsible to reopen it without first dealing with the allegations I dont see how its abbetting someone making personal attacks to leave a prominent red box on the page with a note about how the remarks were completely inappropriate  Je vous invite à me parler 

