Reading the discussions I repeatedly see A number of the season one episodes appear to lack notability which must then imply that some of the episodes do indeed have individual notability and that the ones that appear not to may just actually be so So per WikipediaTelevision episodes Note Stubs are allowed on Wikipedia and many articles are stubs It may be inappropriate to merge or redirect an article about a television episode just because it is a stub Before executing a merge ask yourselfWill the merge reduce the quality or coherence of the target article Are more sources available Do some basic looking for additional source material that could be used to improve the article If the answer to either of these questions is yes it is probably better to avoid merging or redirecting Instead consider improving it or offer suggestions for its improvement on the talk pageHas anyone created a list of stubs proposed for merge Have these stubs been tagged for Notability or Sources and allowed to growHow diligent waswere efforts to expand these stubs before proposing a mergeI respectfully opine no merge until it is shown that the current guideline for such has been fully addressed  MICHAEL Q 

    ####Prompt- Does the next message are offensives ? reply with a JSON object (without carriage return or new lines)
    with keys :
    isoffensive (True if it's offensive).
    This this the message : 
Reading the discussions I repeatedly see A number of the season one episodes appear to lack notability which must then imply that some of the episodes do indeed have individual notability and that the ones that appear not to may just actually be so So per WikipediaTelevision episodes Note Stubs are allowed on Wikipedia and many articles are stubs It may be inappropriate to merge or redirect an article about a television episode just because it is a stub Before executing a merge ask yourselfWill the merge reduce the quality or coherence of the target article Are more sources available Do some basic looking for additional source material that could be used to improve the article If the answer to either of these questions is yes it is probably better to avoid merging or redirecting Instead consider improving it or offer suggestions for its improvement on the talk pageHas anyone created a list of stubs proposed for merge Have these stubs been tagged for Notability or Sources and allowed to growHow diligent waswere efforts to expand these stubs before proposing a mergeI respectfully opine no merge until it is shown that the current guideline for such has been fully addressed  MICHAEL Q 

