Whilst I dont agree with your reasoning I am happy to add my reference to Further Reading rather than References It is not really selfpromotion to add an worthy but outofprint book as further reading for those interested in the subjects Certainly less self promotional than some of the press references which are basically just PR releases given spurious credibility by being recycled in the mainstream press Sadly much of what passes for journalism today is just PR stuff which begs the question of how seriously we should take a lot of references   Well I might dabble in such edits if I had more time To be honest I dont give tuppence whether my books are mentioned or not It is of no advantage whatsoever to me commercial or egotistical I merely thought I was helping but clearly have transgressed Wikis arcane guidelines often inconsistent from what I can see And to be honest I do believe that people may have used my book without true attribution there are one or two things mentioned that are so obscure that it would be rather a coincidence if they hadnt been read first in my book Hopefully Ill not be tempted to dabble in Marmite of which I know a great deal  thank you for your comments and help not meaning to be argumentative but I do like to get things as straight as I can One more thingyou may be able to help with a early drafts of a couple of my articles were tagged as lacking references  but although Ive since added some very good ones from university text books and other mainstream publications the yellow sticker is still at the top of the page How do I get rid of it    

    ####Prompt- Does the next message are offensives ? reply with a JSON object (without carriage return or new lines)
    with keys :
    isoffensive (True if it's offensive).
    This this the message : 
Whilst I dont agree with your reasoning I am happy to add my reference to Further Reading rather than References It is not really selfpromotion to add an worthy but outofprint book as further reading for those interested in the subjects Certainly less self promotional than some of the press references which are basically just PR releases given spurious credibility by being recycled in the mainstream press Sadly much of what passes for journalism today is just PR stuff which begs the question of how seriously we should take a lot of references   Well I might dabble in such edits if I had more time To be honest I dont give tuppence whether my books are mentioned or not It is of no advantage whatsoever to me commercial or egotistical I merely thought I was helping but clearly have transgressed Wikis arcane guidelines often inconsistent from what I can see And to be honest I do believe that people may have used my book without true attribution there are one or two things mentioned that are so obscure that it would be rather a coincidence if they hadnt been read first in my book Hopefully Ill not be tempted to dabble in Marmite of which I know a great deal  thank you for your comments and help not meaning to be argumentative but I do like to get things as straight as I can One more thingyou may be able to help with a early drafts of a couple of my articles were tagged as lacking references  but although Ive since added some very good ones from university text books and other mainstream publications the yellow sticker is still at the top of the page How do I get rid of it    

