Once again I fail to see what this wrong is  Any problems with the section can be fixed but theres no call for removing it in its entirely The idea that Health care is not an important area to the subjects notability is frankly ludicrous given Becks prominence in the current health care debate and the idea that criticism of Beck is some kind of insignificant minority viewpoint is equally ludicrous The question should be not should this belong but how should we construct this section  To have a small cadre of editors repeatedly revert and delete gives credence to the view that you are acting as gatekeepers to the article and wish to whitewash it  I dont hold this view at this point at least for all the editors involved but if you are going to respond to additions to this manner you cant be surprised that people are going to think that   

    ####Prompt- Does the next message are offensives ? reply with a JSON object (without carriage return or new lines)
    with keys :
    isoffensive (True if it's offensive).
    This this the message : 
Once again I fail to see what this wrong is  Any problems with the section can be fixed but theres no call for removing it in its entirely The idea that Health care is not an important area to the subjects notability is frankly ludicrous given Becks prominence in the current health care debate and the idea that criticism of Beck is some kind of insignificant minority viewpoint is equally ludicrous The question should be not should this belong but how should we construct this section  To have a small cadre of editors repeatedly revert and delete gives credence to the view that you are acting as gatekeepers to the article and wish to whitewash it  I dont hold this view at this point at least for all the editors involved but if you are going to respond to additions to this manner you cant be surprised that people are going to think that   

