Thank you for the responses Obviously I made a couple of mistakes The version immediately before yours did have some gaps and problems that I overlooked I guess the sentences The social implication of viewing ageing as a disease could be profound though this classical is not yet widespread and  Lepers were a group of afflicted individuals who historically shunned and the term leper still evokes social sigma Fear of disease can still be a widespread social phenomena Yet not all disease evoke extreme social stigma  made me think you were not a native english speaker because of the multitude of simple number and agreement errors as well as the awkward structure and unusual word useI was trying to get rid of the false distinction between disease and syndrome and linkage of symptom to syndrome A syndrome is simply a combination of problems not just symptoms in the accurate sense of subjective complaints often observed together and presumably related Whether a condition is called Smith disease or Smith syndrome is more a matter of historical contingency than any meaningful denotative distinction It looked like you were reasserting that and I was trying to get rid of it I put it back the way you left it as I dont feel up to a rewrite Sorry for any offense  

    ####Prompt- Does the next message are offensives ? reply with a JSON object (without carriage return or new lines)
    with keys :
    isoffensive (True if it's offensive).
    This this the message : 
Thank you for the responses Obviously I made a couple of mistakes The version immediately before yours did have some gaps and problems that I overlooked I guess the sentences The social implication of viewing ageing as a disease could be profound though this classical is not yet widespread and  Lepers were a group of afflicted individuals who historically shunned and the term leper still evokes social sigma Fear of disease can still be a widespread social phenomena Yet not all disease evoke extreme social stigma  made me think you were not a native english speaker because of the multitude of simple number and agreement errors as well as the awkward structure and unusual word useI was trying to get rid of the false distinction between disease and syndrome and linkage of symptom to syndrome A syndrome is simply a combination of problems not just symptoms in the accurate sense of subjective complaints often observed together and presumably related Whether a condition is called Smith disease or Smith syndrome is more a matter of historical contingency than any meaningful denotative distinction It looked like you were reasserting that and I was trying to get rid of it I put it back the way you left it as I dont feel up to a rewrite Sorry for any offense  

