So cite it as they are the actual direct primary source The socalled independent sources that have been cited in this article like the SPLC are neither reliable nor realistic and nor are they even accurate Image is subjective and POV whereas the actual facts are NPOV Again it is clear that you are not interested in factual accuracy in the articleYou can revert it and just make such Wikipedia articles not relevant nor accurate as usual as this is just becoming ever more common and wellknown in the internet community or justas is the dinosaur mass media Do a little independent research yourself and you will see that everything I had changed IS FACTUAL whereas the article you reverted back to is NOT FACTUALThat is fine with me as this only reflects Wikipedias difficulty with ever having or in getting the facts straight and correct verses being just SPLC false propaganda So be it

    ####Prompt- Does the next message are offensives ? reply with a JSON object (without carriage return or new lines)
    with keys :
    isoffensive (True if it's offensive).
    This this the message : 
So cite it as they are the actual direct primary source The socalled independent sources that have been cited in this article like the SPLC are neither reliable nor realistic and nor are they even accurate Image is subjective and POV whereas the actual facts are NPOV Again it is clear that you are not interested in factual accuracy in the articleYou can revert it and just make such Wikipedia articles not relevant nor accurate as usual as this is just becoming ever more common and wellknown in the internet community or justas is the dinosaur mass media Do a little independent research yourself and you will see that everything I had changed IS FACTUAL whereas the article you reverted back to is NOT FACTUALThat is fine with me as this only reflects Wikipedias difficulty with ever having or in getting the facts straight and correct verses being just SPLC false propaganda So be it

