Im amused that youre unable to see the difference between peerreviewed published material in major journals opinion establishing how the field is received and the respective uses to which these might be put  The piece in Nature India is an excellent source for the fact that CF is a pariah field in the US and to support the fact that a few individuals are nonetheless pursuing the field but it completely fails to establish any kind of resurgence of CF research since its a news piece not a published paper Guy 

    ####Prompt- Does the next message are offensives ? reply with a JSON object (without carriage return or new lines)
    with keys :
    isoffensive (True if it's offensive).
    This this the message : 
Im amused that youre unable to see the difference between peerreviewed published material in major journals opinion establishing how the field is received and the respective uses to which these might be put  The piece in Nature India is an excellent source for the fact that CF is a pariah field in the US and to support the fact that a few individuals are nonetheless pursuing the field but it completely fails to establish any kind of resurgence of CF research since its a news piece not a published paper Guy 

