To identify an inertial frame of reference just use the WEP  As for the EEP I would just say that the underlying laws of physics are the same in all inertial frames of reference  Those laws permit tidal effects to appear in nonuniform gravitational fields 0417 19 Apr 2005 UTCI hold the science of physics to be the following the endeavour to account for the whole corpus of observations in a coherent mathematical framework It all begins with observations and observations should always be the final word Whenever a principle can be stated in a form that is not committed to any specific theory it should be stated in that uncommitted form The Equivalence principle is prime example of that The Harvard tower experiment indicates that there is no clash between quantumphysics and GR as far as measureable aspects of physics are concerned At present the formal frameworks of the two theories cannot be reconciled but the measurements agree The principle of relativity of special relativity can be formulated in a theorycommitted form but Einsteins choice of principle is best in all frames of reference that are not measurably accelerated measurement of the velocity of electromagnetic radiation will yield the same value   Talk 0630 19 Apr 2005 UTC

    ####Prompt- Does the next message are offensives ? reply with a JSON object (without carriage return or new lines)
    with keys :
    isoffensive (True if it's offensive).
    This this the message : 
To identify an inertial frame of reference just use the WEP  As for the EEP I would just say that the underlying laws of physics are the same in all inertial frames of reference  Those laws permit tidal effects to appear in nonuniform gravitational fields 0417 19 Apr 2005 UTCI hold the science of physics to be the following the endeavour to account for the whole corpus of observations in a coherent mathematical framework It all begins with observations and observations should always be the final word Whenever a principle can be stated in a form that is not committed to any specific theory it should be stated in that uncommitted form The Equivalence principle is prime example of that The Harvard tower experiment indicates that there is no clash between quantumphysics and GR as far as measureable aspects of physics are concerned At present the formal frameworks of the two theories cannot be reconciled but the measurements agree The principle of relativity of special relativity can be formulated in a theorycommitted form but Einsteins choice of principle is best in all frames of reference that are not measurably accelerated measurement of the velocity of electromagnetic radiation will yield the same value   Talk 0630 19 Apr 2005 UTC

