Daniel Deronda (Barnes & Noble Classics)
From Earl Dachslager’s Introduction toDaniel DerondaIn itself,Daniel Deronda’s position as Eliot’s last novel lends it some significance, but, far more important,Daniel Derondarepresents Eliot’s summing up, the book in which she hoped to bring together all the values, ideals, and beliefs that had informed her earlier work. In short,Daniel Derondawas not simply Eliot’s final novel, it was her final letter to the world. That she herself was aware thatDaniel Derondawas her fictional finale is made clear from her notes and letters. She recorded in her diary for December 31, 1877 (her final entry): “But of course as the years advance there is a new rational ground for the expectation that my life may become less fruitful. . . . Many conceptions of works to be carried out present themselves, but confidence in my own fitness to complete them worthily is all the more wanting because it is reasonable to argue that I must have already done my best” (Haight, ed.Selections from George Eliot’s Letters, pp. 493–494 [henceforth,Letters]; see “For Further Reading”).From the beginning, Eliot’s books cost her an enormous outlay of energy—physical and emotional. Each book brought with it anxiety and the desperate feeling that not only would the book never be completed but also that in the end it would be worthless. She had arrived at the conviction that authors should stop when they had no more to say. But even if she had the energy and desire to write another “big book,” they likely vanished when Lewes died, at age sixty-one, on November 30, 1878; he had been her partner and champion for nearly twenty-five years and, to some degree, her creator. “Without George Henry Lewes,” Kathryn Hughes wrote, in her excellent biography of Eliot, “there could have been no George Eliot” (George Eliot: The Last Victorian, p. 327).Daniel Derondathus stands as the culmination of a series of novels that began twenty years earlier with the publication ofScenes of Clerical Life(1858). But in some original and singular respects,Daniel Derondamay also be viewed as Eliot’sfirstfictional creation.For one thing, of all of Eliot’s novelsDaniel Derondais by far the most global, the one with the widest range of national and international references. Geographically,Daniel Derondatakes the reader to London, Paris, Prague, Vienna, Rome, Frankfurt, Hamburg, Mainz, Genoa, Trieste, Beirut (or “Beyrout” as Eliot spells it), Sardinia, Corsica, Ajaccio, Palestine, and New York—a globe-hopping journey that in itself makesDaniel Derondaunique among Eliot’s novels. For that reason, it has often been called the first international novel. Writing in theNationthe yearDaniel Derondawas published, Henry James praised the novel for its “multitudinous world” and “its widening narrative” (quoted in Haight,A Century of George Eliot Criticism, pp. 92–93).Also unique is thatDaniel Derondais the only novel Eliot wrote that is set close to her own time. The action of the novel takes place over two years, between October 1864 and October 1866, and begins in September 1865 (see note 1). Thus the events of the story take place approximately ten years before the book was published, which makes it Eliot’s most contemporary novel and the one that is most connected to topics current in her day.Daniel Derondais also Eliot’s most original novel in its construction (anticipated, to some degree, by her 1859 gothic story “The Lifted Veil”), one of the earliest examples in English prose fiction of what would become the hallmark of much modern literature: the replacement of the straightforward, linear plot—beginning, middle, end—with a disrupted, nonlinear plot that depends on both flashbacks and flash-forwards.The effect of the narrative’s temporal and spatial shifts is to give the story the illusion of movement in time and space and to make the main characters appear as a Victorian version of jet-setters. Unlike Eliot’s provincial novels—Adam Bede(1859),The Mill on the Floss(1860), andSilas Marner(1861)—Daniel Derondais not a book about rural England or even fifteenth-century Florence, the setting of Eliot’s 1863 novelRomola, but about Europe, the Middle East, and even America, where Mirah Lapidoth has been. To this extent,Daniel Derondais Eliot’s most expansive novel and one of the most far-ranging in nineteenth-century literature.But even more radical than its bold use of time and space—certainly more daring for its day—is the novel’s movement across social, political, psychological, and literary boundaries. Such transitions and transformations result from what the novel is about: the conflicts and connections, differences and similarities, between two separate but related worlds—the “Jewish” world and the “English” world, the first represented primarily by Daniel Deronda and Mordecai Lapidoth; the second by Gwendolen Harleth, her mother, and their social community.