FAST LANE ON A DIRT ROAD:  A Contemporary History of Vermont
Professor Emeritus, University of VermontAnnouncer: Are you thinking of putting up a political slogan in your dooryard? Commentator Jules Older has a book he wants you to read first.Take back Vermont.Fine. But before you cement that Take Back Vermont sign into your front yard and turn it into a permanent lawn fixture, lemme give you a suggestion.ReadFast Lane on a Dirt Roadby Joe Sherman. As the subtitle says, it's a contemporary history of Vermont. The original version, published in 1991, has been updated to include Vermont events as recent as Fred Tuttle's campaign for Senate and the civil union bill.But it's the early stuff that most interested me, and should most interest you if you're thinking of turning your home into an ad for Take Back Vermont. BecauseFast Lane on a Dirt Roadtells you, loud and clear, what you're taking it back to. Starting with poverty. Grinding, rural, pull-yer-teeth-while-yer-young poverty. Then there's foul water - local control didn't much mind when local sewage pipes dumped directly into the stream. If you lived in a mill town, better add the relationship between factory worker and factory owner that pretty much mimicked the relationship between serf and lord of the manor. Then, toss in a government so undemocratic that Stratton, population 24, had the same number of representatives (one) as Burlington, population 35,000 (also one).Not forgetting the poll tax-oh, yeah, Vermont had one of those-or giving the right to govern back to the land owners and taking it back from everyone else.I'm not talking ancient history, here. In 1961 Vermont had the second lowest personal income in the country -and the third highest per-capita tax rate. And when Sherman writes, "On the farm and in the factory, workers were perceived by many as little more than beasts of burden," he was talking about the 1940s, not the 1840s. At the time, Vermont workers suffered from silicosis, asbestosis, black lung disease, limbs chewed off by unshielded machines -let's go back! Let's take it back! Those were the good old days. But Joe Sherman doesn't just view Vermont's past as an onion and the future as a rose; he's fully aware that promised roses often end up smelling like onions. He writes, " . . . a perceptive few always knew that the Gospel of Progress would have a downside. To claim that joy and goodness would come with progress, without sorrow and sadness as an equally right inheritance, was na¯ve. It was like saying a garden could grow with all sun and no rain, that manure's richness didn't stink." He's saddened by our loss of contact with the land, not by the terrible poverty that so often went with it. Sherman writes primarily about the Vermont he knew growing up the son of a mill worker in then-gritty Quechee. His book is a grand mix of his own experience, sharp-eyed interviews and careful research. And I must say, he's a hell of a writer. Take this passage: " . . . like some bucolic Renoir, Vermont, round, soft, and voluptuous, came into its own as a romantic draw."Or consider this: "In Vermont, and across most of America, it seemed to me that tradition was like patriotism; that is, the last refuge of scoundrels. Traditional meant sentimental, it meant ignorance of the real past, it meant nostalgia for what never was."Take back Vermont? Fine. But first read Fast Lane on a Dirt Road so you can't then say you didn't know what you were taking it back to.This is Jules Older back in Albany, Vermont, the Soul of the Kingdom."Fast Lane on a Dirt Road is far and away the best overview of Vermont during the past sixty years that I have read."--Edward J. Feidner"This is history with a viewpoint."--ARTSletter