Philosophies of Nature after Schelling (Transversals: New Directions in Philosophy)
'Intriguing and ambitious...Philosophies of Nature After Schellingsets a new standard for Schelling scholarship. More than this, it is an important work of philosophy in its own right.' -Radical Philosophy144 (July/August 2007) (Radical Philosophy)"Philosophies of Nature after Schellingis an important, indeed a groundbreaking work." - Joseph P. Lawrence, College of the Holy Cross,Notre Dame Philosophy Review, May 10, 2007"Iain Hamilton Grant's bookPhilosophies of Nature after Schellingproposes that we think about nature as irreducible to the entire dichotomous game of self and world, idealism and realism. Indeed, Grant argues for a reconsideration of "nature" in terms of the classical notion ofphusis—this is a 'physics' that is less concerned with quasi-verifiable, smallest units of matter and more a physics in the sense of a dynamical and ideational flux that pervades the very correlation of self and world, idea and thing." —Eugene Thacker,Leonardo/ISAST, 2009'Intriguing and ambitious…Philosophies of Nature After Schellingsets a new standard for Schelling scholarship. More than this, it is an important work of philosophy in its own right.’ -Radical Philosophy144 (July/August 2007) (Radical Philosophy)“Iain Hamilton Grant’s bookPhilosophies of Nature after Schellingproposes that we think about nature as irreducible to the entire dichotomous game of self and world, idealism and realism. Indeed, Grant argues for a reconsideration of “nature” in terms of the classical notion ofphusis—this is a 'physics’ that is less concerned with quasi-verifiable, smallest units of matter and more a physics in the sense of a dynamical and ideational flux that pervades the very correlation of self and world, idea and thing.” –Eugene Thacker,Leonardo/ISAST, 2009