If a second contract is signed after a prior one and they fully conflict going against fully being each other and there is no mention done of which contract mainly overrides being the other then in the given being situation which given prevails actually?
  

  



**Content before last given editm :**
  

Let us say A and Z sign two contracts.


The first contract says that A will pay Z $0.5 to $1 a month. There is no mention of what happens if another contract is signed opposing its terms.


Later A and Z sign a contract stating $0.2 will be paid to Z per month and nothing more. There is no mention of the first contract in this one.


Which of the two contracts will prevail over the other?



Do newer contracts supersede prior ones?