79/253/EEC: Commission Decision of 31 January 1979 relating to an investigation on the basis of Article 14 (3) of Council Regulation No 17 at the undertaking Fides, Milan (Case AF/IV/372) (Only the Italian text is authentic)

COMMISSION DECISION  of 31 January 1979  relating to an investigation on the basis of Article 14 (3) of Council Regulation No 17 at the undertaking Fides, Milan (Case AF/IV/372)  (Only the Italian text is authentic)  (79/253/EEC)
THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES
,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community, and in particular Article 85 thereof,
Having regard to Council Regulation No 17 of 6 February 1962 (1), and in particular Article 14 (3) thereof,
Having consulted the Ministry for Industry, Trade and Craft Trades, Rome, the competent authority within the meaning of Article 14 (4) of Regulation No 17,
Whereas:
There are adequate grounds for presuming the existence of agreements between ... (2), manufacturers in different Member States, the purpose of which is to fix prices and uniform terms of sale on the Italian market and to share out among Italian manufacturers the types and volume of ... manufactured;
On 13 June 1977 Mr Vouel, Member of the Commission with special responsibility for competition policy, ordered investigation to be made at various firms, pursuant to Article 14 of Regulation No 17;
The Commission has precise, corroborative information in its possession that Fides, Unione Fiduciaria, with headquarters at via Vittor Pisani 22, Milan, has been appointed to perform, on behalf of the various ... manufacturers, the activities required to organize and operate the agreements in question;
Fides refused to submit to the investigation planned for 9 June 1978, and objected to the investigating officials that the procedure initiated by the Commission did not concern Fides, since it was not involved in the manufacturing or marketing of ... and that, even if it performed services on behalf of firms in the sector in question, in accordance with its function as a societĂ  fiduciaria, it could not supply information or documents on these activities to the Commission without special authorization from its principals;
However, the arguments put forward by Fides in refusing to submit to the investigation are unfounded, since the Commission has serious reason to believe that the company performs, or has performed, for ... manufacturing firms services which are directly connected with the circumstances forming the object of the Commission's enquiries, and since, moreover, business secrecy cannot be invoked against Commission officials acting pursuant to Article 14 of Regulation No 17, since Article 20 of the same Regulation requires that they shall not disclose information acquired in the course of investigations carried out in application of the Regulation;  (1)OJ No 13, 21.2.1962, p. 204/62. (2)In the published version of this Decision, some data have hereinafter been omitted, pursuant to the provisions of Article 21 of Regulation No 17, concerning non-disclosure of business secrets.
Fides must therefore be required, by means of a decision, to submit to investigation and in particular to allow books and papers connected with the object of the enquiry to be examined;
Articles 15 (1) (c) and 16 (1) (d) of Regulation No 17, the full texts of which are annexed hereto, empower the Commission, by decision adopted in regard to undertakings or associations of undertakings, to:    (a) impose fines where, intentionally or negligently, the required books or other business records are produced in incomplete form during investigations pursuant to Article 14, or where the undertakings or associations of undertakings concerned refuse to submit to the investigations ordered by decision pursuant to Article 14 (3);
(b) impose penalty payments for each day's delay, with effect from the date laid down in the decision, in order to compel them to submit to an investigation ordered by decision pursuant to Article 14 (3),