90/374/EEC: Commission Decision of 2 July 1990 approving an amendment to the limits on reimbursement of expenditure incurred by Italy pursuant to Council Regulation (EEC) No 1401/86 (Only the Italian text is authentic)

COMMISSION  DECISION
of 2 July 1990
approving an amendment to the limits on reimbursement of expenditure incurred by Italy pursuant to Council Regulation (EEC) No 1401/86
(Only the Italian text is authentic)
(90/374/EEC)
THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES
,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community,
Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 1401/86 of 6 May 1986 introducing a common measure for the encouragement of agriculture in certain less-favoured areas of northern Italy (1), and in particular Article 7 (3) thereof,
Whereas the Italian Government, pursuant to Article 4 (1) of Regulation (EEC) No 1401/86 has forwarded to the Commission updatings of certain programmes approved by the Commission and in particular the programmes relating to the Autonomous Province of Bolzano and the Regions of Piedmont, Lombardia and Valle d'Aosta;
Whereas the Italian Government forwarded to the Commission a recapitulatory document for each of the regions concerned, specifying the new breakdown of expenditure planned for each of the schemes referred to in Article 2 of Regulation (EEC) No 1401/86, in order to allow the Commission to check the overall coherence of the common measure;
Whereas, at the Commission's request, the Italian authorities forwarded a progress report on 13 October 1989 concerning the implementation of the abovementioned schemes;
Whereas, in order to accelerate agricultural development in the areas concerned, the limits laid down in Article 7 (2) of Regulation (EEC) No 1401/86 should be amended within the limit of the overall expenditure initially planned; whereas such amendment does not affect the estimated cost of the common measure specified in Article 6 (3) of the same Regulation;
Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee on Agricultural Structures and Rural Development,