Commission Regulation (EC) No 1718/96 of 29 August 1996 initiating an investigation concerning the circumvention of anti-dumping measures imposed by Council Regulations (EEC) No 993/93 and (EEC) No 2887/93 on imports of certain electronic weighing scales originating respectively in Japan and Singapore, by imports of parts thereof assembled in the European Community and making the latter imports subject to registration

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1718/96 of 29 August 1996 initiating an investigation concerning the circumvention of anti-dumping measures imposed by Council Regulations (EEC) No 993/93 and (EEC) No 2887/93 on imports of certain electronic weighing scales originating respectively in Japan and Singapore, by imports of parts thereof assembled in the European Community and making the latter imports subject to registration
THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES
,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 of 22 December 1995 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community (1), and in particular Articles 13 and 14 thereof,
After consulting the Advisory Committee,
Whereas:
A. REQUEST
(1) The Commission has received a request pursuant to Article 13 (3) of Regulation (EC) No 384/96 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Basic Regulation`) to investigate the alleged circumvention of the anti-dumping duties, imposed with respect to Teraoka Seiko Co. Ltd (Japan) and Teraoka Weigh System PTE Ltd (Singapore), by Council Regulation (EEC) No 993/93 (2) and Council Regulation (EEC) No 2887/93 (3), as amended by Regulation (EC) No 2937/95 (4), on imports of certain electronic weighing scales originating respectively in Japan and Singapore, by imports of parts thereof which are subsequently used for the assembly of these weighing scales in the Community, to make the imports of these parts subject to registration by the customs authorities pursuant to Article 14 (5) of the Basic Regulation and to propose to the Council the extension, where justified, of the above anti-dumping duties to the latter imports.
B. APPLICANTS
(2) The request has been lodged on 19 July 1996 by the following companies:
Bizerba GmbH & Co. KG, Campesa SA, Dataprocess SpA, Dataprocess Industria SpA, Testut SA, Lutrana SA, GEC Avery Ltd, Maatschappij Van Berkel's Patent BV and Brevetti Van Berkel SpA.
According to the request, these companies are all manufacturers of retail electronic weighing scales whose collective output represents approximately 65 % of the total Community production of such products.
C. PRODUCT
(3) The products through which the alleged circumvention is taking place are parts which are used for the assembly in the Community of electronic weighing scales for use in the retail trade which incorporate a digital display of the weight, unit price and price to be paid (whether or not including a means of printing this data), falling within CN code 8423 81 50 ('REWS`). These products ('REWS parts`) are currently classifiable under CN code ex 8423 90 00. These codes are given for information only and have no binding effect on the classification of the products.
D. REGISTRATION
(4) In view of the fact that the request only concerns the alleged circumvention of anti-dumping measures with respect to Teraoka Seiko Co. Ltd (Japan) and Teraoka Weigh System PTE Ltd (Singapore), registration of imports should be limited to REWS parts falling within CN code 8423 90 00, originating in Japan or Singapore, manufactured by or for and/or imported from these companies into the Community.
E. EVIDENCE
(5) The request contains sufficient evidence in accordance with Article 13 of the Basic Regulation that the anti-dumping duties on imports of REWS originating in Japan and Singapore, imposed with regard to Teraoka Seiko Co. Ltd and Teraoka Weigh System PTE Ltd, are being circumvented by imports of REWS parts originating in these countries manufactured and/or exported by the two companies concerned and/or by any of their related companies and which are used in assembly operations in the Community.
(6) The evidence is as follows:
(a) Since the initiation of the last anti-dumping investigations with regard to Japan on 26 February 1991 and with regard to Singapore on 11 May 1994, a clear change has taken place in the pattern of trade between the two countries concerned and the Community. In this respect, the request points out that imports into the Community of REWS from the two countries concerned taken together decreased in terms of units between 1994 and the first half of 1995, extrapolated on an annual basis, by 27 %, whereas in the same period imports of parts from these countries showed an increase in terms of weight of over 30 %. This increase allegedly took place at around the same time as the commencement of the assembly in the Community.
This change in the pattern of trade is alleged to stem from the assembly of REWS in the Community for which there is insufficient due cause or economic justification, apart from the existence of the anti-dumping duties. The most obvious cause of the abovementioned change in the pattern of trade is that imports of parts are not required to pay the 15,4 % anti-dumping duty imposed on imports of REWS manufactured by Teraoka Weigh System PTE Ltd (Singapore) or the 22,6 % anti-dumping duty imposed on imports of REWS manufactured by Teraoka Seiko Co. Ltd (Japan).
(b) Furthermore, the request contains evidence which shows that the prices at which the REWS assembled from REWS parts imported from Japan and Singapore are being sold in the Community are lower than the non-dumped level of the export price established in the anti-dumping investigations for the REWS assembled in Japan and Singapore.
(c) Finally, the request contains evidence which shows that the alleged circumvention is undermining the remedial effects of the existing anti-dumping duties in terms of the quantities and prices of the assembled like product. This is preventing the Community industry from achieving a reasonable profit which would allow it to keep up with the rapid pace of technological change in the electronic manufacturing industry.
F. PROCEDURE
(7) In the light of the evidence contained in the request, the Commission has concluded that sufficient evidence exists to justify the initiation of an investigation pursuant to Article 13 (3) of the Basic Regulation, and to make imports of REWS parts mentioned in recital 3 subject to registration in accordance with Article 14 (5) of the said Regulation.
(i) Questionnaires
(8) In order to obtain the information it deems necessary for its investigation, the Commission will send a questionnaire to the assembler of REWS in the Community named in the request as well as to Teraoka Seiko Co. Ltd (Japan) and Teraoka Weigh System PTE Ltd (Singapore). Information, as appropriate, may also be sought from Community producers.
(9) Other interested parties which can show that they are likely to be affected by the outcome of the investigation, should request a questionnaire from the Commission within 15 days of publication of this Regulation in the Official Journal of the European Communities. Any request for questionnaires must be made in writing to the address mentioned below, and should indicate the name, address, telephone and fax numbers of the requesting party.
The authorities of Japan and Singapore will be notified of the initiation of the investigation and provided with a copy of the request.
(ii) Certificates of non-circumvention
(10) In accordance with Article 13 (4) of the Basic Regulation, certificates exempting the imports of the product concerned from registration or measures may be issued by the customs authorities to importers when the importation does not constitute circumvention.
Since the issue of this certificate requires the prior authorization of the Community institutions, requests for such authorizations should be addressed to the Commission as early as possible in the course of the investigation so that they may be considered on the basis of a thorough appraisal of their merits.
G. TIME LIMIT
(11) In the interest of sound administration, a period should be fixed within which interested parties, provided they can show that they are likely to be affected by the results of the investigation, may make their views known in writing. A period should also be fixed within which interested parties may make a written request for a hearing and show that there are particular reasons why they should be heard.
Furthermore, it should be stated that, in cases in which any interested party refuses access to, or otherwise does not provide necessary information within the time limit, or significantly impedes the investigation, findings, affirmative or negative, may be made in accordance with Article 18 of the Basic Regulation, on the basis of the facts available,