Council Regulation (EEC) No 2052/92 of 30 June 1992 adjusting, for the second time, the system of aid for cotton introduced by Protocol 4 annexed to the Act of Accession of Greece

COUNCIL REGULATION (EEC) No 2052/92 of 30 June 1992 adjusting, for the second time, the system of aid for cotton introduced by Protocol 4 annexed to the Act of Accession of Greece
THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES
,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community,
Having regard to the Act of Accession of Greece, and in particular paragraph 11 of Protocol 4 on cotton, as amended by Regulation (EEC) No 4006/87 (1),
Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 1964/87 of 2 July 1987 adjusting the system of aid for cotton introduced by Protocol 4 annexed to the Act of Accession of Greece (2), and in particular Article 3 (2) thereof,
Having regard to the proposal from the Commission (3),
Having regard to the opinion of the European Parliament (4),
Having regard to the opinion of the Economic and Social Committee (5),
Whereas examination of the operation of the system introduced for cotton by Protocol 4 referred to in Article 3 (2) of Regulation (EEC) No 1964/87 reveals a need for adjustment;
Whereas the production of cotton is very important to the agricultural economy of certain regions of the Community; whereas, in order to give cotton producers more guarantee as to their income, the annual fixing of the maximum guaranted quantity should  be replaced by fixing for a longer period;
Whereas the current level of the maximum guaranteed quantity has permitted cotton-growing in the Community to be maintained at an acceptable level; whereas, therefore, the quantity of cotton for which aid is granted should be maintained in its entirety;  whereas this objective can be met by fixing the maximum guaranteed quantity at 701 000 tonnes of cotton of the average quality of unginned cotton produced in the Community;
Whereas, with a view to avoiding excessive variations in the reduction of the aid, it is appropriate that this reduction be limited to 15 % of the norm price and the proportion in excess of this maximum together with any difference between actual and  estimated production should be carried forward, without application of that limit, to the following marketing year;
Whereas experience may show the need to make other adjustments to the system provided for by the abovementioned Protocol; whereas, therefore, a procedure should be laid down whereby the Council may adjust the system,