Tokens: 1
.
It
is
recalled
that
the
applicant
alleged
that
,
on
account
of
the
fact
that
he
had
been
obliged
to
withdraw
from
his
parliamentary
duties
in
order
to
be
able
to
continue
his
professional
activity
–
a
particularly
apt
field
for
the
development
of
any
individual
’s
personality
,
talents
and
skills
–
he
had
been
subjected
to
an
unjustified
interference
in
his
private
life
which
extended
to
his
professional
life
.
In
addition
,
he
claimed
that
,
from
the
date
on
which
the
rule
on
disqualification
in
question
came
into
force
,
his
income
as
a
lawyer
had
simply
ceased
,
and
accordingly
he
had
suffered
heavily
from
the
application
of
the
new
Article
57
of
the
Constitution
.
The
applicant
consequently
concluded
that
Article
8
of
the
Convention
was
applicable
and
had
been
violated
.
Labels: O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O