Tokens: It
is
established
that
the
Latvian
courts
omitted
to
consider
properly
the
psychological
situation
of
the
child
,
the
child
’s
welfare
situation
in
Australia
,
and
the
future
relationship
between
the
mother
and
the
child
were
the
child
to
be
returned
to
Australia[38
]
.
In
the
light
of
Neulinger
and
Shuruk
,
these
deficiencies
in
the
national
proceedings
alone
would
have
sufficed
to
find
a
violation
under
Article
8
,
since
they
did
not
comply
with
the
“
in
-
depth
”
or
,
in
the
Grand
Chamber
’s
new
jargon
,
“
effective
”
examination
required
by
Article
8
.
In
practical
terms
,
the
Grand
Chamber
applied
once
again
the
Neulinger
and
Shuruk
test[39
]
.
Labels: O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O