Tokens: 4
.
We
strongly
believe
that
these
separate
opinions
have
a
point
.
Some
of
the
separate
opinions
cited
above
pleaded
for
the
inadmissibility
of
evidence
obtained
in
breach
of
the
rights
and
freedoms
guaranteed
by
the
Convention
,
based
on
the
argument
of
the
effectiveness
of
the
Convention
rights
.
According
to
Judge
Loucaides
in
his
separate
opinion
in
Khan
[
6
]
,
and
Judge
Tulkens
in
her
separate
opinion
in
P.G.
and
J.H.
v.
the
United
Kingdom
[
7
]
,
“
...
if
violating
Article
8
can
be
accepted
as
fair
then
I
can
not
see
how
the
police
can
be
effectively
deterred
from
repeating
their
impermissible
conduct
.
”
Indeed
,
other
alternatives
,
such
as
the
possibility
of
disciplinary
proceedings
against
State
agents
violating
a
Convention
provision
,
or
a
civil
action
in
damages
against
the
State
,
can
not
offer
a
remedy
comparable
to
the
exclusionary
rule
of
inadmissibility
of
evidence
obtained
in
breach
of
the
Convention[8
]
,
for
three
reasons
.
Labels: O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O