Tokens: 46
.
This
is
exactly
what
the
Constitutional
Court
concluded
in
the
M.
case
,
which
concerned
the
removal
of
the
10
-
year
limit
with
retrospective
effect
.
In
this
case
,
the
court
decided
that
such
removal
only
affected
those
who
were
already
under
preventive
detention
at
the
time
of
entry
into
force
of
the
law
,
and
not
those
whose
preventive
detention
measure
had
already
come
to
an
end
at
that
time
.
Furthermore
,
the
“
common
weal
”
(
das
Wohl
der
Allgemeinheit
)
prevailed
over
the
targeted
detainees
’
trust
that
the
lawful
10
-
year
maximum
would
be
kept.[137
]
Labels: O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O