Tokens: ...
The
Court
,
having
regard
to
its
case
-
law
...
,
considers
that
the
mere
fact
that
Judge
P.
had
already
been
a
member
of
the
bench
which
had
made
the
first
order
for
the
applicant
’s
retrospective
preventive
detention
and
moreover
,
following
the
quashing
of
that
judgment
,
had
been
a
member
of
the
bench
ordering
the
applicant
’s
retrospective
preventive
detention
anew
on
3
August
2012
,
did
not
suffice
to
raise
objectively
justified
doubts
as
to
his
impartiality
.
Labels: O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O