Tokens: (
b
)
Secondly
,
where
the
abducting
parent
,
in
the
circumstances
,
is
not
in
a
position
to
take
care
of
the
child
in
the
State
where
the
child
had
his
or
her
habitual
residence
at
the
time
of
the
abduction
,
or
manifestly
can
not
be
so
required
.
That
condition
also
appears
to
me
to
have
been
fulfilled
.
As
the
Court
rightly
observes
,
the
mother
’s
refusal
to
return
to
Israel
does
not
appear
entirely
unjustified
.
Having
Swiss
nationality
,
she
is
entitled
to
remain
in
Switzerland
.
Even
supposing
that
she
agreed
to
return
to
Israel
,
there
would
be
an
issue
as
to
who
would
take
care
of
the
child
in
the
event
of
her
imprisonment
(
paragraph
150
of
the
judgment
)
.
Labels: O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O