Tokens: 11
.
And
indeed
,
in
the
present
case
,
the
Court
assessed
not
only
how
the
measure
was
conceived
but
also
how
it
was
enforced
,
pushing
its
autonomous
assessment
of
the
actual
situation
to
very
great
lengths
.
The
conclusion
it
reached
is
that
the
nature
of
a
measure
can
change
in
the
course
of
its
enforcement
.
Depending
on
its
mode
of
enforcement
,
it
can
successively
take
on
the
characteristics
of
a
penalty
,
a
therapeutic
measure
,
possibly
reverting
to
being
a
penalty
,
and
so
on
.
This
is
what
the
Court
refers
to
as
the
“
dynamic
”
aspect
of
the
measure
.
Labels: O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O