Tokens: 18
.
The
Court
accepts
that
in
exceptional
cases
there
may
also
be
liability
in
a
situation
of
constructive
knowledge
(
“
could
reasonably
have
known”)[33
]
.
For
the
assessment
of
constructive
knowledge
,
the
Court
uses
the
due
diligence
obligations
of
responsible
journalism
which
are
based
on
the
rules
of
ethics
of
journalism[34
]
.
It
can
be
said
that
a
journalist
could
reasonably
have
known
of
the
defamatory
or
otherwise
unlawful
content
of
the
hyperlinked
message
where
he
or
she
did
not
respect
the
ethics
of
journalism
and
did
not
comply
with
the
due
diligence
obligations
of
responsible
journalism
.
Any
lower
subjective
standard
for
liability
would
inevitably
lead
to
self
-
censorship
.
Labels: O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O