Tokens: 41
.
Worse
still
,
this
assumption
diverts
the
public
authorities
from
their
obligation
to
provide
the
means
needed
for
a
resocialisation
-
driven
prison
system
.
Put
another
way
,
such
an
assumption
dangerously
imperils
the
principle
of
resocialisation
of
prisoners
,
because
the
full
realisation
of
this
principle
in
prisons
would
violate
the
distance
requirement
as
well
.
Or
does
the
distance
requirement
mean
that
the
constitutional
judges
accept
that
an
unconstitutional
practice
continues
to
prevail
in
prisons
?
This
requirement
does
not
fit
into
the
modern
criminal
-
law
approach
of
counteracting
the
possible
damage
to
the
personality
(
Haftschäden
)
caused
by
any
kind
of
long
-
term
detention.[128
]
If
the
assumption
of
the
“
purposeless
majesty
”
of
a
prison
sentence
is
wrong
,
as
modern
criminal
law
tells
us
,
the
distance
requirement
can
not
subsist
and
,
“
without
the
distance
requirement
,
the
institution
of
preventive
detention
is
incompatible
with
the
fundamental
right
to
liberty
of
detainees
under
preventive
detention
.
”[129
]
Labels: O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O