Tokens: 9
.
The
Court
attempts
to
further
dilute
the
importance
of
the
applicants
’
speech
claims
by
arguing
that
the
“
impugned
publication
”
can
not
be
regarded
as
either
contributing
to
a
debate
of
public
interest
or
as
a
form
of
political
speech
,
which
enjoys
a
privileged
position
in
the
case
-
law
of
this
Court
(
see
§
178
of
the
judgment
)
.
We
find
this
reasoning
strained
,
for
the
obvious
reason
that
Finnish
legislative
policy
has
seen
fit
to
render
taxation
data
publicly
accessible
.
This
is
all
the
more
salient
given
,
as
the
majority
notes
,
that
in
so
doing
Finland
is
part
of
a
small
minority
of
Convention
States
,
thus
placing
all
the
greater
weight
on
the
public
interest
in
publicity
and
transparency
concerning
taxation
data
(
see
§
§
81
,
120
-
121
of
the
judgment
)
.
Labels: O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O