Tokens: 3
.
I
will
refrain
from
a
structural
criticism
of
this
paragraph
.
I
can
not
help
noting
,
however
,
that
here
again
the
Court
finds
it
necessary
to
remark
that
when
it
is
being
assessed
whether
or
not
the
Administrative
Court
is
to
be
considered
a
court
that
affords
the
safeguards
of
Article
6
para
.
1
(
art
.
6
-
1
)
,
"
regard
must
be
had
to
the
complaints
raised
in
that
court
"
.
One
looks
in
vain
,
however
,
for
evidence
of
this
methodological
principle
being
put
into
practice
:
there
does
not
follow
any
analysis
of
what
the
applicant
argued
before
the
Administrative
Court
,
nor
is
there
any
trace
of
"
regard
"
to
these
arguments
in
the
assessment
of
the
adequacy
of
the
Administrative
Court
's
jurisdiction
.
For
the
rest
,
I
refer
to
the
methodological
objections
to
this
"
test
"
that
I
raised
in
paragraph
18
of
my
separate
opinion
in
the
case
of
Fischer
v.
Austria
(
judgment
of
26
April
1995
,
Series
A
no
.
312
)
.
Labels: O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O