Tokens: 63
.
The
Court
notes
at
the
outset
that
the
applicant
provided
the
Court
with
a
power
of
attorney
dated
8
June
2016
and
duly
signed
by
the
applicant
and
his
representative
.
A
copy
of
that
power
of
attorney
together
with
the
applicant
’s
observations
was
sent
to
the
Government
on
6
July
2016
.
The
Court
further
reiterates
that
an
applicant
is
entitled
to
the
reimbursement
of
costs
and
expenses
only
in
so
far
as
it
has
been
shown
that
these
have
been
actually
and
necessarily
incurred
and
are
reasonable
as
to
quantum
.
In
the
present
case
,
although
the
document
specifying
the
representative
’s
services
refers
to
the
preparation
of
the
application
lodged
with
the
Court
,
it
is
clear
from
the
documents
in
the
case
file
that
the
applicant
was
not
represented
when
he
lodged
his
application
with
the
Court
.
Therefore
,
the
applicant
’s
application
was
not
prepared
by
his
representative
and
the
amount
of
work
done
by
the
latter
before
the
Court
was
limited
to
the
preparation
of
the
applicant
’s
observations
and
just
satisfaction
claims
.
Having
regard
to
these
facts
,
as
well
as
to
the
documents
in
its
possession
and
the
above
criteria
,
the
Court
considers
it
reasonable
to
award
to
the
applicant
the
sum
of
EUR
850
covering
costs
under
all
heads
.
Labels: O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O