Tokens: 2
.
While
it
is
true
that
the
applicant
instituted
constitutional
redress
proceedings
complaining
,
inter
alia
,
about
the
discretion
of
the
Attorney
General
as
public
prosecutor
to
decide
in
which
court
to
try
an
accused
,
he
failed
to
make
this
complaint
expressly
under
Article
7
of
the
Convention
,
claiming
a
violation
of
Article
6
§
1
of
the
Convention
instead
.
Subsequently
,
following
the
judgment
of
the
Court
in
Camilleri
v.
Malta
(
no
.
42931/10
,
22
January
2013
)
,
the
applicant
asked
the
courts
to
add
a
complaint
under
Article
7
,
claiming
a
lack
of
foreseeability
.
The
national
courts
rejected
the
request
to
allow
this
additional
complaint
.
This
rejection
was
apparently
based
on
Article
175
of
the
Code
of
Organisation
and
Civil
Procedure
(
Chapter
12
of
the
Laws
of
Malta
)
,
according
to
which
the
power
of
a
court
to
permit
amendments
to
pleadings
is
limited
to
situations
where
such
amendments
do
not
affect
the
substance
either
of
the
action
or
of
the
defence
on
the
merits
of
the
case
.
Labels: O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O