Tokens: 25
.
The
significance
of
the
question
of
approach
or
attitude
in
the
present
case
lies
in
the
fact
that
,
as
already
mentioned
,
and
as
was
generally
admitted
,
neither
in
the
Convention
as
a
whole
nor
in
Article
6.1
(
art
.
6
-
1
)
in
particular
,
is
any
provision
expressly
made
for
a
specific
general
substantive
right[14
]
(
14
)
of
access
to
the
courts
.
It
is
in
fact
common
ground
that
if
the
principle
of
such
a
right
is
provided
for
,
or
even
recognized
at
all
by
any
Article
of
the
Convention
,
this
can
only
result
from
an
inference
drawn
from
the
first
sentence
of
Article
6.1
(
art
.
6
-
1
)
-
which
reads
as
follows
:
Labels: O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O