Tokens: 12
.
However
,
the
Court
fails
to
consider
that
a
larger
quantity
of
data
does
contribute
to
public
interest
since
it
promotes
fiscal
transparency
(
which
is
why
the
law
was
passed
in
the
first
place
)
.
Furthermore
,
whether
or
not
the
data
can
be
used
for
voyeuristic
purposes
does
not
undermine
(
let
alone
preclude
)
the
public
interest
of
the
published
information
.
The
publication
of
more
information
can
not
automatically
mean
that
the
information
is
of
lesser
value
,
has
less
public
interest
,
is
voyeuristic
,
or
is
prone
to
sensationalism
(
see
,
by
converse
implication
,
Von
Hannover
v.
Germany
,
no
.
59320/00
,
§
65
,
ECHR
2004‑VI
)
.
The
impugned
publication
is
not
one
concerning
intimate
aspects
of
private
life
which
is
typically
the
object
of
voyeurism
,
a
term
never
defined
by
the
majority.[7
]
Labels: O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O