Tokens: 3l
.
In
consequence
,
there
is
here
a
further
point
at
which
,
as
in
the
case
of
what
was
discussed
in
paragraphs
19
-
22
of
this
Opinion
,
a
term
could
,
so
far
as
I
am
concerned
,
logically
be
put
to
the
question
of
the
effect
of
Article
6.1
(
art
.
6
-
1
)
-
for
since
that
provision
does
not
define
,
then
whatever
is
the
right
or
freedom
it
might
imply
,
that
right
or
freedom
would
not
come
within
the
scope
of
Article
1
(
art
.
1
)
and
its
overall
governing
obligation
.
This
is
also
precisely
Judge
von
Verdross
’
view
.
That
this
conclusion
may
legitimately
suggest
the
deduction
that
Article
6.1
(
art
.
6
-
1
)
does
not
in
fact
imply
any
such
right
or
freedom
,
but
deals
only
with
the
modalities
of
litigation
,
leads
naturally
to
a
resumption
of
the
discussion
broken
off
at
the
end
of
paragraph
25
above
where
,
it
having
emerged
quite
clearly
from
the
analysis
previously
made
,
that
Article
6.1
(
art
.
6
-
1
)
,
while
assuming
the
existence
of
proceedings
,
did
not
in
terms
give
expression
to
any
positive
right
to
bring
them
,
the
question
was
asked
whether
the
Article
(
art
.
6
-
1
)
must
nevertheless
be
regarded
as
doing
so
by
a
process
of
implication
or
inference
.
Also
raised
was
the
further
question
of
what
it
would
be
proper
and
legitimate
to
imply
by
means
of
such
a
process
.
Labels: O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O