Tokens: “
As
the
Court
has
had
previous
occasion
to
remark
,
the
concept
of
‘
private
life
’
is
a
broad
term
not
susceptible
to
exhaustive
definition
.
It
covers
the
physical
and
psychological
integrity
of
a
person
(
see
X
and
Y
v.
the
Netherlands
,
[
26
March
1985
,
§
22
,
Series
A
no
.
91
]
)
.
It
can
sometimes
embrace
aspects
of
an
individual
’s
physical
and
social
identity
(
see
Mikulić
v.
Croatia
,
no
.
53176/99
,
§
53
,
ECHR
2002
-
I
)
.
Article
8
also
protects
a
right
to
personal
development
,
and
the
right
to
establish
and
develop
relationships
with
other
human
beings
and
the
outside
world
and
it
may
include
activities
of
a
professional
or
business
nature
.
There
is
,
therefore
,
a
zone
of
interaction
of
a
person
with
others
,
even
in
a
public
context
,
which
may
fall
within
the
scope
of
‘
private
life
’
(
see
,
inter
alia
,
Peck
v.
the
United
Kingdom
,
no
.
44647/98
,
§
57
,
ECHR
2003
-
I
)
.
”
[
3
]
Labels: O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O