Tokens: 13
.
As
a
consequence
,
one
cannot
help
but
note
(
if
only
in
passing
)
that
,
if
the
respondent
Government
had
raised
this
as
a
preliminary
objection
,
there
might
have
been
some
question
as
to
whether
,
by
applying
to
the
employment
courts
on
the
basis
he
did
,
the
applicant
had
,
in
fact
,
exhausted
those
domestic
remedies
“
that
relate
to
the
breaches
alleged
and
which
are
at
the
same
time
available
and
sufficient
”
(
see
Aquilina
v
.
Malta
[
GC
]
,
no
.
25642
/
94
,
§
39
,
ECHR
1999
-
III
)
.
After
all
,
there
is
no
material
before
the
Court
to
suggest
that
any
of
the
three
remedies
identified
above
,
and
,
in
particular
,
a
complaint
to
the
specialist
data
protection
supervisory
authority
and
/
or
an
action
for
damages
under
Law
no
.
677
/
2001
before
the
competent
courts
were
“
bound
to
fail
”
(
see
Davydov
and
Others
v
.
Russia
,
no
.
75947
/
11
,
§
233
,
30
May
2017
)
.
Labels: O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O