Tokens: 24
.
In
this
context
,
we
would
lastly
emphasise
that
the
case
differs
considerably
from
the
Court
’s
previous
case
-
law
about
various
measures
that
have
been
applied
in
connection
with
the
issues
of
dismantling
the
heritage
of
former
communist
totalitarian
systems
(
see
Ždanoka
,
cited
above
;
Ādamsons
v.
Latvia
,
no
.
3669/03
,
24
June
2008
;
Sidabras
and
Džiautas
v.
Lithuania
,
nos
.
55480/00
and
59330/00
,
§
§
42
-
50
,
ECHR
2004
-
VIII
;
Rainys
and
Gasparavičius
v.
Lithuania
,
nos
.
70665/01
and
74345/01
,
7
April
2005
;
Žičkus
,
cited
above
;
and
Matyjek
v.
Poland
,
no
.
38184/03
,
24
April
2007
)
.
In
particular
,
we
would
like
to
underline
that
this
case
is
not
about
criminal
sanctions
or
employment
restrictions
in
the
public
or
private
sector
.
None
of
the
cases
referred
to
above
involved
situations
where
the
applicants
’
complaints
were
limited
to
the
mere
fact
that
their
service
in
the
security
or
intelligence
organisations
of
an
undemocratic
regime
had
been
made
public
.
Labels: O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O