Tokens: 14
.
In
its
resolution
of
12
March
2014
on
the
US
NSA
surveillance
programme
,
surveillance
bodies
in
various
Member
States
and
their
impact
on
EU
citizens
’
fundamental
rights
and
on
transatlantic
cooperation
in
Justice
and
Home
Affairs[22
]
,
the
European
Parliament
virulently
condemned
the
vast
and
systemic
blanket
collection
of
the
personal
data
of
innocent
people
,
often
including
intimate
personal
information
,
in
an
“
indiscriminate
and
non
-
suspicion
-
based
manner
”
,
calling
on
EU
Member
States
to
ensure
that
their
intelligence
services
were
subject
to
parliamentary
and
judicial
oversight
and
public
scrutiny
and
that
they
respect
the
principles
of
legality
,
necessity
,
proportionality
,
due
process
,
user
notification
and
transparency
.
In
the
framework
of
the
relations
between
the
EU
and
the
US
,
the
European
Parliament
specifically
required
that
effective
guarantees
be
given
to
Europeans
to
ensure
that
the
use
of
surveillance
and
data
processing
for
foreign
intelligence
purposes
is
proportional
,
limited
by
clearly
specified
conditions
,
and
related
to
reasonable
suspicion
and
probable
cause
of
terrorist
activity
,
stressing
that
this
purpose
must
be
subject
to
transparent
judicial
oversight
.
One
year
later
,
the
European
Parliament
resolution
of
29
October
2015
on
the
follow
-
up
to
the
European
Parliament
resolution
of
12
March
2014[23
]
called
on
the
Commission
to
prepare
guidelines
for
Member
States
on
how
to
bring
any
instruments
of
personal
data
collection
for
the
purpose
of
the
prevention
,
detection
,
investigation
and
prosecution
of
criminal
offences
,
including
terrorism
,
into
line
with
the
judgments
of
the
Court
of
Justice
on
data
retention
and
on
Safe
Harbour
,
pointing
in
particular
to
paragraphs
58
and
59
of
the
data
retention
judgment
and
to
paragraphs
93
and
94
of
the
Safe
Harbour
judgment
,
which
,
in
the
parliamentarians
’
view
,
clearly
demand
a
targeted
approach
for
data
collection
rather
than
a
‘
full
take
’
.
It
further
warned
against
the
obvious
downward
spiral
for
the
fundamental
right
to
privacy
and
personal
data
protection
occurring
when
every
bit
of
information
on
human
behaviour
is
considered
to
be
potentially
useful
in
combating
future
criminal
acts
,
necessarily
resulting
in
a
mass
surveillance
culture
where
every
citizen
is
treated
as
a
potential
suspect
and
leading
to
the
corrosion
of
societal
coherence
and
trust
.
Labels: O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O