Tokens: In
paragraph
37
of
its
judgment
,
the
Court
reiterates
that
the
relevant
law
must
be
formulated
with
sufficient
precision
.
Earlier
cases
have
repeatedly
stated
that
,
where
a
law
confers
a
discretion
,
the
scope
of
the
discretion
and
the
manner
of
its
exercise
must
be
indicated
with
sufficient
clarity[5
]
.
In
the
instant
case
,
the
issue
is
not
so
much
the
scope
of
the
discretion
but
rather
the
alleged
vagueness
of
the
law
.
What
the
Court
has
said
with
respect
to
discretion
could
usefully
be
expanded
so
as
to
include
also
the
problem
of
vagueness
of
the
instant
case
.
After
the
Grigoriades
case
therefore
,
the
rule
could
be
formulated
as
follows
:
Labels: O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O