Tokens: 1
.
Although
I
have
subscribed
to
the
joint
dissent
of
Judges
Sajó
,
Karakaş
,
Keller
,
Vehabović
,
Kūris
and
Grozev
(
“
the
joint
dissent
”
)
,
I
am
also
writing
separately
for
three
reasons
.
Firstly
,
I
am
convinced
that
the
heart
of
this
case
lies
in
the
way
the
Constitutional
Court
of
Italy
(
the
“
Constitutional
Court”[38
]
)
interpreted
the
Varvara
judgment[39
]
.
To
my
mind
,
the
joint
dissent
does
not
exhaust
the
reasons
why
the
Constitutional
Court
misunderstood
Varvara
.
I
will
elaborate
further
on
this
issue
.
Secondly
,
I
feel
that
I
owe
an
additional
explanation
for
voting
for
a
violation
of
Article
7
of
the
European
Convention
on
Human
Rights
(
“
the
Convention
”
)
in
the
present
case
(
in
respect
of
the
applicant
Mr
Gironda
)
,
while
I
voted
in
the
opposite
sense
in
the
Varvara
case
.
Labels: O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O