Tokens: 41
.
The
Court
agrees
with
the
Government
that
the
circumstances
of
this
case
differ
from
those
of
the
Leander
case
in
which
the
respondent
State
was
found
to
have
interfered
with
Article
8
(
art
.
8)
rights
by
compiling
,
storing
,
using
and
disclosing
private
information
about
the
applicant
in
that
case
.
Nevertheless
,
as
in
the
Leander
case
,
a
file
exists
in
this
case
concerning
details
of
Mr
Gaskin
’s
personal
history
which
he
had
no
opportunity
of
examining
in
its
entirety
.
Labels: O
O
B-Distinguishing
I-Distinguishing
I-Distinguishing
I-Distinguishing
I-Distinguishing
I-Distinguishing
I-Distinguishing
I-Distinguishing
I-Distinguishing
I-Distinguishing
I-Distinguishing
I-Distinguishing
I-Distinguishing
I-Distinguishing
I-Distinguishing
I-Distinguishing
I-Distinguishing
I-Distinguishing
I-Distinguishing
I-Distinguishing
I-Distinguishing
I-Distinguishing
I-Distinguishing
I-Distinguishing
I-Distinguishing
I-Distinguishing
I-Distinguishing
I-Distinguishing
I-Distinguishing
I-Distinguishing
I-Distinguishing
I-Distinguishing
I-Distinguishing
I-Distinguishing
I-Distinguishing
I-Distinguishing
I-Distinguishing
I-Distinguishing
I-Distinguishing
I-Distinguishing
I-Distinguishing
I-Distinguishing
I-Distinguishing
I-Distinguishing
I-Distinguishing
I-Distinguishing
I-Distinguishing
I-Distinguishing
I-Distinguishing
I-Distinguishing
I-Distinguishing
I-Distinguishing
I-Distinguishing
I-Distinguishing
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O