Tokens: In
this
regard
,
there
is
a
huge
difference
between
the
present
case
and
Bergmann
.
In
the
latter
,
the
applicant
was
a
recidivist
who
had
been
diagnosed
by
the
trial
court
with
a
mental
illness
already
at
the
time
of
the
offence
and
had
already
been
transferred
into
the
newly
-
built
institutions
appropriate
for
offenders
with
a
mental
-
health
condition
when
the
continuation
of
preventive
detention
was
ordered
under
the
conditions
laid
down
in
the
second
sentence
of
section
316f
(
2
)
of
the
Introductory
Act
to
the
Criminal
Code.[324
]
In
contrast
,
in
the
present
case
,
the
applicant
was
a
first
offender
,
acted
with
full
responsibility
at
the
time
of
the
offence
,
was
detained
at
the
time
of
delivery
of
judgment
by
the
Regional
Court
(
3
August
2012
)
in
conditions
not
complying
with
the
Convention
and
was
only
transferred
to
the
new
centre
for
preventive
detention
two
years
later
.
Labels: O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O