Tokens: 87
.
The
Court
stresses
that
it
is
not
its
function
to
question
the
doctors
'
clinical
judgment
as
regards
the
seriousness
of
the
first
applicant
's
condition
or
the
appropriateness
of
the
treatment
they
proposed
.
Moreover
,
the
second
applicant
has
been
given
clear
guidance
on
how
to
assert
her
rights
in
the
event
of
a
future
emergency
.
In
addition
,
it
can
not
speculate
as
to
what
would
have
been
the
outcome
of
an
application
by
the
Trust
to
the
High
Court
for
authorisation
to
pursue
the
proposed
.
treatment
On
the
other
hand
,
the
second
applicant
can
be
considered
to
have
suffered
stress
and
anxiety
in
her
dealings
with
the
doctors
and
officials
representing
the
Trust
as
well
as
feelings
of
powerlessness
and
frustration
in
trying
to
defend
her
own
perception
of
what
was
in
the
best
interests
of
her
child
.
Deciding
on
an
equitable
basis
,
it
awards
the
applicants
jointly
10,000
euros
(
EUR
)
.
Labels: O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O