Tokens: 112
.
According
to
the
Court
’s
case
-
law
,
an
applicant
is
entitled
to
the
reimbursement
of
costs
and
expenses
only
in
so
far
as
it
has
been
shown
that
these
have
been
actually
and
necessarily
incurred
and
are
reasonable
as
to
quantum
.
The
Court
notes
that
Mr
Puzanov
signed
two
legal
services
agreements
,
one
to
represent
the
applicant
in
the
proceedings
before
the
Court
and
an
identical
one
to
represent
her
son
.
However
,
as
the
Government
correctly
pointed
out
,
only
one
applicant
,
Ms
Gladysheva
,
had
lodged
this
case
,
and
not
her
son
.
The
Court
therefore
finds
that
the
part
of
the
claims
related
to
the
service
agreement
on
behalf
of
the
applicant
’s
son
,
which
amounted
to
EUR
5,000
of
her
claims
for
costs
and
expenses
,
must
be
rejected
.
As
to
the
remaining
sums
relating
to
Mr
Puzanov
’s
legal
services
,
the
Court
acknowledges
that
he
had
made
substantial
submissions
on
the
applicant
’s
behalf
,
leaving
no
doubt
that
he
had
rendered
her
the
legal
services
,
as
alleged
.
The
Court
considers
that
the
applicant
must
be
reimbursed
for
his
services
under
the
agreement
with
her
,
irrespective
of
whether
he
was
in
possession
of
the
advocate
’s
stamp
required
by
the
Government
.
Labels: O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O