Tokens: 44
.
It
is
true
,
as
pointed
by
the
Government
,
that
the
applicant
could
further
challenge
the
decision
of
20
July
2011
before
an
investigating
judge
.
However
,
the
Court
notes
that
the
investigating
judge
could
only
revoke
the
decision
and
send
the
case
back
to
the
same
prosecutor
who
had
already
stayed
the
investigation
on
three
occasions
.
The
Court
finds
that
the
repeated
staying
of
the
investigation
by
the
prosecutor
and
the
fact
that
the
investigating
judge
could
only
revoke
the
decisions
adopted
by
the
prosecutor
,
thereby
returning
the
case
to
the
same
stage
at
which
it
had
been
for
a
long
period
of
time
(
the
decision
of
20
July
2011
was
adopted
almost
five
years
after
the
applicant
’s
alleged
ill
-
treatment
in
September
2006
)
,
rendered
ineffective
the
remedy
referred
to
by
the
Government
in
the
applicant
’s
case
.
In
this
sense
the
present
case
,
in
which
the
applicant
challenged
the
prosecutor
’s
decisions
to
stay
the
investigation
three
times
,
is
to
be
distinguished
from
Levinţa
,
referred
to
above
,
in
which
the
applicants
made
no
such
challenge
.
Labels: O
O
B-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
I-Subsumtion
B-Distinguishing
I-Distinguishing
I-Distinguishing
I-Distinguishing
I-Distinguishing
I-Distinguishing
I-Distinguishing
I-Distinguishing
I-Distinguishing
I-Distinguishing
I-Distinguishing
I-Distinguishing
I-Distinguishing
I-Distinguishing
I-Distinguishing
I-Distinguishing
I-Distinguishing
I-Distinguishing
I-Distinguishing
I-Distinguishing
I-Distinguishing
I-Distinguishing
I-Distinguishing
I-Distinguishing
I-Distinguishing
I-Distinguishing
I-Distinguishing
I-Distinguishing
I-Distinguishing
I-Distinguishing
I-Distinguishing
I-Distinguishing
I-Distinguishing
I-Distinguishing
I-Distinguishing
I-Distinguishing
I-Distinguishing
I-Distinguishing
I-Distinguishing
I-Distinguishing
I-Distinguishing
I-Distinguishing
I-Distinguishing