Tokens: beause
he
had
abused
his
rights
by
making
it
impossible
for
the
child
to
have
contact
with
his
mother
,
whereas
the
mother
's
care
–
at
that
stage
of
the
child
's
development
–
was
indispensable
.
In
our
opinion
,
taking
into
account
all
the
relevant
circumstances
,
this
far
-
reaching
limitation
of
the
applicant
's
parental
rights
was
justified
as
he
had
shown
a
complete
disregard
for
the
child
's
well
-
being
and
health
.
It
was
only
after
this
decision
that
the
police
removed
the
child
from
the
applicant
.
In
these
circumstances
it
is
quite
understandable
–
although
not
justified
–
that
the
mother
was
not
immediately
prepared
to
restore
the
applicant
's
access
rights
as
determined
by
the
court
during
the
time
when
the
applicant
had
abducted
his
child
(
one
visit
on
the
third
Saturday
of
each
month
at
the
mother
's
home
from
10
a.m.
to
4
p.m.
without
the
possibility
of
taking
the
child
anywhere
outside
)
.
Given
that
the
parents
were
apparently
unable
or
unwilling
to
communicate
with
each
other
in
a
rational
manner
about
,
for
instance
,
parental
issues
and
that
the
child
's
welfare
obviously
required
that
he
should
not
be
exposed
to
a
bitter
parental
dispute
,
we
feel
that
the
domestic
authorities
would
have
been
irresponsible
in
imposing
stringent
coercive
measures
on
the
mother
,
at
least
during
the
initial
period
in
which
she
was
reunited
with
the
child
.
Labels: O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O