Tokens: 2
.
The
majority
state
that
,
“
for
a
measure
to
be
regarded
as
both
proportionate
and
necessary
in
a
democratic
society
,
there
must
be
no
possibility
of
recourse
to
an
alternative
measure
that
would
cause
less
damage
to
the
fundamental
right
at
issue
whilst
fulfilling
the
same
aim
”
(
see
paragraph
29
of
the
judgment
,
referring
to
Sabanchiyeva
and
Others
v.
Russia
,
no
.
38450/05
,
§
§
131
-
134
,
ECHR
2013
(
extracts
)
;
emphasis
added
)
.
The
same
idea
is
expressed
further
in
the
judgment
:
“
(
S)uch
a
severe
measure
can
only
be
justified
,
and
be
in
compliance
with
the
proportionality
requirements
of
Article
8
of
the
Convention
,
if
the
national
authorities
had
first
ruled
out
the
possibility
of
having
recourse
to
alternative
measures
that
would
have
caused
less
damage
to
the
fundamental
right
at
issue
whilst
fulfilling
the
same
aim
”
(
see
paragraph
34
of
the
judgment
,
referring
to
Nada
v.
Switzerland
[
GC
]
,
no
.
10593/08
,
§
183
,
ECHR
2012
;
emphasis
added
)
.
Labels: O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O