Tokens: 57
.
The
Court
observes
that
no
breach
of
Article
8
has
as
yet
occurred
.
Nevertheless
,
the
Court
having
found
that
the
decision
to
expel
the
first
applicant
would
,
if
implemented
,
give
rise
to
a
breach
of
that
provision
,
Article
41
must
be
taken
as
applying
to
the
facts
of
the
case
.
That
said
,
the
Court
considers
that
its
finding
regarding
Article
8
in
itself
amounts
to
adequate
just
satisfaction
for
the
purposes
of
Article
41
(
see
M.
and
Others
,
cited
above
,
§
143
)
.
The
same
goes
for
the
Court
’s
related
finding
regarding
Article
13
(
see
Raza
,
cited
above
,
§
88
)
.
Labels: O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O