Tokens: We
do
not
share
the
views
of
the
majority
in
this
case
.
It
is
true
,
on
the
one
hand
,
that
the
measure
directed
at
the
applicant
is
a
harsh
one
,
as
the
centre
of
his
family
life
has
been
localised
in
Austria
and
as
ten
years
is
a
long
period
for
a
residence
prohibition
.
On
the
other
hand
,
the
applicant
lived
in
Austria
for
a
relatively
short
time
(
six
years
)
.
It
is
not
as
if
he
had
spent
all
his
life
there
.
He
speaks
the
language
of
his
country
of
destination
and
presumably
could
,
from
the
moment
of
his
expulsion
onwards
,
build
a
new
existence
in
that
country
.
The
presence
of
an
Austrian
fiancée
and
of
a
son
born
out
of
this
relationship
seem
to
be
subsequent
to
the
relevant
facts
.
All
these
circumstances
relativise
a
measure
which
,
otherwise
,
could
have
been
viewed
as
disproportionate
,
account
being
taken
,
especially
,
of
the
applicant
's
relatively
young
age
.
Labels: O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O