Tokens: 3
.
In
short
,
as
the
Court
makes
clear
in
paragraph
208
,
some
of
the
criteria
set
out
in
the
case
-
law
of
the
Court
to
assess
whether
a
measure
constitutes
a
penalty
for
the
purposes
of
Article
7
are
“
static
”
or
“
not
susceptible
to
change
after
the
point
in
time
when
the
measure
was
ordered
”
.
That
holds
particularly
for
the
criterion
on
whether
the
measure
in
question
was
imposed
following
conviction
for
a
“
criminal
offence
”
or
that
of
the
procedures
involved
in
its
making
.
“
In
contrast
,
other
criteria
,
including
those
of
the
nature
and
purpose
of
the
measure
and
of
its
severity
,
can
be
described
as
‘
dynamic
’
or
susceptible
to
change
over
time
”
.
Therefore
,
“
in
order
to
assess
the
compliance
of
a
measure
with
Article
7
§
1
during
a
given
period
,
the
actual
manner
in
which
the
measure
was
executed
throughout
that
period
must
therefore
be
considered
relevant
and
must
be
taken
into
consideration
by
the
Court
”
(
see
paragraph
208
of
the
judgment
)
.
Labels: O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O