Tokens: 67
.
Contrary
to
the
Constitutional
Court
’s
assumption
,
its
consideration
of
the
Court
’s
value
judgments
in
a
“
result
-
oriented
”
manner
is
not
sufficient
.
There
must
be
a
Convention
-
oriented
fundamental
rights
theory
,
which
is
something
different
and
more
demanding.[184
]
The
Court
’s
judgments
do
not
have
a
mere
“
de
facto
function
of
orientation
and
guidance
for
the
interpretation
of
the
Convention
”
(
faktische
Orientierungs-
und
Leitfunktion
)
,
[
185
]
as
the
Constitutional
Court
claims
.
All
the
Court
’s
judgments
have
the
same
legal
value
,
binding
nature
and
interpretative
authority
,
which
value
,
nature
and
authority
are
the
same
for
all
Contracting
Parties
to
the
Convention.[186
]
The
fact
that
the
Convention
leaves
it
to
them
to
decide
how
they
should
comply
with
the
duty
to
observe
the
provisions
of
the
Convention[187
]
does
not
empower
States
to
nullify
or
circumvent
the
effect
of
the
Court
’s
judgments
.
The
content
of
the
Court
’s
judgments
must
not
be
“
rethought
”
(
umgedacht
)
[
188
]
in
the
receiving
constitutional
system
to
such
an
extent
that
it
deprives
them
of
their
meaning
and
purpose
.
Labels: O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O