Tokens: 88
.
These
questions
are
not
rhetorical
:
they
seek
to
show
that
the
relevance
of
the
statute
of
limitations
to
the
“
national
identity
”
,
protected
by
the
famous
“
counter
-
limits
”
invoked
in
judgment
no
.
24/2017
,
was
totally
ignored
in
judgment
no
.
49/2015
,
simply
because
it
was
not
convenient
for
the
purposes
of
the
case
.
If
it
is
true
that
,
as
judgment
no
.
24/2017
quite
rightly
argues
and
the
European
Court
of
Justice
also
confirmed[229
]
,
prescrizione
is
a
fundamental
guarantee
of
defendants
in
the
constitutional
and
legal
order
of
Italy
,
and
indeed
in
the
European
legal
order
,
it
is
incomprehensible
that
the
same
guarantee
played
no
role
whatsoever
in
the
reasoning
of
judgment
no
.
49/2015
.
Labels: O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O