Tokens: 4
.
The
reliance
on
Mr
Kocherov
’s
disability
as
a
justification
for
restricting
his
parental
authority
stems
from
the
submissions
made
by
the
children
’s
home
,
which
argued
that
he
was
incapable
of
exercising
his
parental
responsibilities
due
to
his
mental
disability
,
while
providing
the
District
Court
only
with
undated
reports
by
its
own
staff
to
support
this
statement
(
see
paragraphs
17
and
18
of
the
judgment
)
.
The
representatives
of
the
children
’s
home
maintained
these
claims
and
further
stated
,
in
particular
,
that
the
first
applicant
would
be
unable
to
provide
the
second
applicant
with
proper
hygienic
care
,
owing
to
his
mental
disability
and
his
lifelong
stay
in
a
closed
specialist
institution
(
see
paragraph
26
)
.
Moreover
,
a
representative
of
the
municipal
custody
and
guardianship
authority
and
a
public
prosecutor
both
corroborated
the
children
’s
home
’s
claims
and
explicitly
identified
the
first
applicant
’s
diagnosis
,
along
with
his
wife
’s
condition
,
as
the
main
ground
for
refusing
to
transfer
the
second
applicant
into
her
father
’s
care
,
as
two
parents
with
mental
disabilities
would
be
unable
to
ensure
the
second
applicant
’s
harmonious
development
(
see
paragraph
27
)
.
Labels: O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O