Tokens: 19
.
Between
the
Scylla
of
the
solution
of
direct
confrontation
with
the
Strasbourg
Court
,
as
proposed
by
the
Court
of
Cassation[90
]
,
and
the
Charybdis
of
direct
subordination
to
it
,
as
suggested
by
the
Tribunale
di
Teramo[91
]
,
the
Constitutional
Court
searched
for
a
via
de
mezzo
,
placing
the
Varvara
judgment
in
the
context
of
a
progressive
,
continuous
stream
of
case
-
law[92
]
which
does
not
always
reveal
clearly
the
principle
upon
which
the
case
had
been
decided[93
]
.
In
the
Constitutional
Court
’s
view
,
Varvara
did
not
set
a
new
,
binding
principle
and
did
not
correspond
to
consolidated
case
-
law
,
i.e.
,
case
-
law
from
which
“
a
norm
capable
of
guaranteeing
the
legal
certainty
and
uniformity
in
the
Contracting
States
of
a
minimum
level
of
protection
of
human
rights
”
can
be
derived[94
]
.
Labels: O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O