Tokens: 86
.
Apart
from
the
fact
that
it
lacks
a
detailed
analysis
of
the
legal
and
jurisprudential
context
of
the
specific
domestic
norms
investigated
,
the
obvious
methodological
problem
with
the
majority
’s
survey
is
that
the
research
question
–
“
measures
...
to
protect
the
public
from
convicted
offenders
of
unsound
mind
who
risk
committing
further
serious
offences
on
their
release”[229
]
–
was
too
broad
.
As
a
result
,
the
report
covered
many
measures
that
seem
to
be
comparable
,
but
at
closer
look
are
not
.
In
sum
,
in
the
thirty
-
two
States
surveyed
only
three
(
Belgium[230
]
,
the
United
Kingdom[231
]
and
Switzerland[232
]
)
have
measures
with
some
degree
of
similarity
to
the
German
one
.
In
any
event
,
the
European
consensus
is
certainly
not
in
favour
of
retrospective
preventive
detention
,
and
most
certainly
not
in
favour
of
such
measure
for
juveniles.[233
]
A
very
telling
fact
is
that
in
France
the
Constitutional
Council
prohibited
the
retrospective
application
of
a
measure
of
preventive
detention
,
in
view
of
its
“
liberty
-
restricting
nature”.[234
]
Labels: O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O