Tokens: 44
.
In
this
context
,
it
is
plain
to
see
that
having
preventive
detention
for
convicted
offenders
who
had
been
found
mentally
fit
to
stand
trial
and
legally
responsible
but
are
mislabelled
as
“
mentally
disordered
”
persons
only
serves
the
purpose
of
prolonging
their
incarceration
ad
aeternum
,
and
if
need
be
,
retrospectively
,
regardless
of
whether
they
are
recoverable
or
not
.
In
fact
,
the
Constitutional
Court
,
in
its
judgment
of
4
May
2011
,
also
adopted
this
perspective
in
the
case
of
an
appellant
G.
who
had
been
confined
in
psychiatric
hospitals
under
measures
of
correction
and
prevention
(
Article
63
of
the
Criminal
Code
)
,
and
whose
confinement
had
been
terminated
on
the
grounds
that
the
complainant
was
unamenable
to
therapy
(
therapieunfähig
)
,
the
court
having
ordered
the
remainder
of
the
custodial
sentences
to
be
executed
,
and
subsequently
his
preventive
detention.[134
]
Labels: O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O