Tokens: 4
.
The
reasoning
in
paragraph
179
of
the
present
judgment
indicates
that
,
in
order
to
satisfy
the
Court
’s
test
,
the
national
courts
ought
to
have
expanded
in
explicit
wording
on
the
role
(
“
specific
mantle
”
)
of
the
Lithuanian
partisans
as
“
representatives
”
of
the
Lithuanian
nation
.
In
the
words
of
the
majority
,
in
order
to
satisfy
that
test
,
“
much
historical
and
factual
material
”
ought
to
have
been
provided
.
In
other
words
,
in
order
to
find
no
violation
of
the
Convention
,
the
majority
would
have
been
satisfied
had
the
Lithuanian
courts
explicitly
explained
“
what
the
notion
‘
representatives
’
entailed
”
.
Labels: O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O