Tokens: 24
.
In
the
case
at
hand
,
the
external
control
by
Parliament
’s
National
Security
Committee
and
the
Commissioner
for
Fundamental
Rights
does
not
guarantee
an
independent
evaluation
of
the
ministerial
exercise
of
decisional
powers
,
in
view
of
the
external
supervisory
entities
’
own
lack
of
review
powers
in
concrete
cases[45
]
.
In
addition
,
in
the
course
of
his
or
her
inquiry
affecting
the
national
security
services
,
the
Commissioner
for
Fundamental
Rights
is
deprived
of
almost
all
relevant
documentation
,
since
he
or
she
may
not
inspect
registers
for
the
identification
of
individuals
cooperating
with
the
national
security
services
,
documents
containing
the
technical
data
of
devices
and
methods
used
by
the
national
security
services
for
intelligence
information
gathering
,
or
documents
making
it
possible
to
identify
the
persons
using
them
,
documents
relating
to
encryption
activities
and
encoding
,
security
documents
relating
to
the
installations
and
staff
of
the
national
security
services
,
documents
related
to
security
documents
and
technological
control
,
documents
in
respect
of
which
access
would
make
possible
the
identification
of
the
source
of
the
information
,
or
documents
with
regard
to
which
access
would
infringe
the
obligations
undertaken
by
the
national
security
services
towards
foreign
partner
services[46
]
.
Labels: O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O