Tokens: 88
.
Entry
into
and
search
of
a
home
by
Army
personnel
such
as
occurred
in
the
present
case
were
explicitly
permitted
by
section
14
(
3
)
of
the
1978
Act
for
the
purpose
of
effecting
arrests
under
that
section
(
see
paragraphs
36
and
38(d
)
above
)
.
The
Court
of
Appeal
upheld
the
legality
of
the
search
in
the
present
case
(
see
paragraph
30
above
)
.
The
short
period
of
restraint
endured
by
the
other
members
of
Mrs
Murray
’s
family
when
they
were
asked
to
assemble
in
one
room
was
held
by
the
House
of
Lords
to
be
a
necessary
and
proper
part
of
the
procedure
of
arrest
of
Mrs
Murray
(
see
paragraph
33
above
)
.
The
Court
of
Appeal
and
the
House
of
Lords
also
confirmed
that
the
Army
’s
implied
lawful
authority
under
section
14
extended
to
interrogating
a
detained
person
and
to
recording
personal
details
of
the
kind
contained
in
the
standard
record
form
(
see
paragraph
41
above
and
also
paragraphs
15
,
30
and
34
)
.
It
is
implicit
in
the
judgments
of
the
national
courts
that
the
retention
of
such
details
was
covered
by
the
same
lawful
authority
derived
from
section
14
(
see
paragraph
41
in
fine
above
)
.
The
taking
and
,
by
implication
,
also
the
retention
of
a
photograph
of
the
first
applicant
without
her
consent
had
no
statutory
basis
but
,
as
explained
by
the
trial
court
judge
and
the
Court
of
Appeal
,
were
lawful
under
the
common
law
(
see
paragraphs
26
,
30
,
39
and
40
above
)
.
Labels: O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O