Tokens: On
a
more
general
level
this
judgment
should
have
reflected
on
whether
the
“
foreseeability
”
requirement
inherent
in
the
notion
of
lawfulness
was
satisfied
in
the
instant
case
:
can
an
individual
,
even
with
the
benefit
of
legal
advice
,
foresee
that
his
house
may
be
searched
and
his
belongings
seized
on
the
basis
of
a
warrant
which
has
been
procured
through
reliance
on
financial
information
concerning
him
that
is
covered
by
banking
secrecy
and
has
been
“
stolen
”
by
a
third
party
?
Labels: O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O