Tokens: 22
.
A
s
regards
the
applicant
’s
argument
about
his
loss
of
employment
as
a
result
of
the
publication
of
the
information
in
question
,
we
consider
that
this
argument
is
neither
entirely
consistent
nor
supported
by
evidence
.
We
therefore
disagree
with
the
conclusions
drawn
in
paragraph
63
of
the
judgment
.
As
noted
above
,
according
to
the
applicant
,
he
had
not
concealed
the
fact
of
his
employment
in
the
KGB
and
this
fact
had
already
been
publicly
known
before
the
publication
of
the
information
.
At
the
same
time
,
he
submitted
that
his
colleagues
had
derided
him
after
the
publication
of
the
announcement
.
Furthermore
,
while
the
applicant
argued
that
he
had
been
forced
to
quit
his
job
,
he
resumed
his
employment
with
the
same
employer
after
a
while
(
see
paragraph
25
of
the
judgment
)
.
In
connection
with
his
claim
for
just
satisfaction
,
the
applicant
referred
to
the
loss
of
four
months
’
salary
without
submitting
any
evidence
in
this
respect
.
For
that
reason
the
Court
rejected
his
claim
in
respect
of
pecuniary
damage
(
see
paragraph
68
of
the
judgment
)
.
In
these
circumstances
,
we
are
unable
to
find
that
the
interruption
of
the
applicant
’s
employment
was
attributable
to
the
respondent
State
,
regard
also
being
had
to
the
fact
that
the
Disclosure
Act
did
not
provide
for
such
consequences
and
that
it
was
open
to
the
applicant
to
challenge
any
possible
unlawful
termination
or
interruption
of
his
employment
according
to
the
labour
law
in
force
.
Similarly
,
civil
-
law
remedies
were
at
the
applicant
’s
disposal
as
regards
any
possible
damage
to
his
personality
rights
(
for
example
,
injury
to
his
honour
)
caused
by
third
parties
.
However
,
the
applicant
has
not
argued
that
he
has
made
use
of
any
such
remedies
.
Labels: O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O