Tokens: 8
.
We
note
that
the
majority
consider
that
the
interim
order
of
15
October
2008
was
irrelevant
from
the
viewpoint
of
Swiss
law
and
could
not
affect
the
parental
rights
of
the
father
under
Swiss
law
.
This
assumption
should
have
required
a
much
more
thorough
analysis
under
Swiss
law
.
The
interim
court
order
issued
in
Poland
on
15
October
2008
might
have
been
justified
from
the
viewpoint
of
Swiss
law
(
under
Article
11
§
1
of
the
1996
Hague
Convention
)
and
therefore
could
have
had
certain
effects
on
the
scope
of
the
applicant
’s
custody
rights
under
Swiss
law
.
Labels: O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O