Tokens: 118
.
The
one
-
thousand
-
dollar
question
is
this
one
:
how
can
a
“
link
”
(
or
a
“
connection
”
)
be
“
erased
”
,
but
“
not
completely
severed
”
?
The
linguistically
awkward
way
in
which
the
majority
express
themselves
is
the
best
evidence
of
the
fallacious
nature
of
this
line
of
reasoning
.
In
Bergmann
,
the
talk
was
about
the
“
eclipse”[306
]
of
the
punitive
element
,
now
it
is
about
the
“
erasure”[307
]
of
that
element
.
Surprisingly
,
the
majority
even
acknowledge
that
the
“
improved
material
conditions
and
care
”
do
not
change
the
nature
of
“
ordinary
”
preventive
detention
,
since
they
do
not
“
erase
the
factors
indicative
of
a
penalty”.[308
]
Labels: O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O