Tokens: 126
.
Ultimately
,
the
majority
disregard
the
severity
of
the
imposed
measure
as
being
decisive
in
itself,[330
]
contradicting
their
facts
-
oriented
evaluation
of
the
detention
conditions
.
It
is
notable
that
in
a
judgment
that
is
intended
to
defend
the
“
therapeutic
”
nature
of
a
coercive
measure
there
is
no
mention
of
the
concrete
benefits
that
the
applicant
has
received
and
is
receiving
in
the
Straubing
detention
centre
.
If
the
majority
truly
believe
that
the
preventive
detention
in
the
present
case
is
indeed
primarily
a
therapeutic
measure
,
one
would
expect
them
to
comment
,
at
least
to
some
extent
,
on
how
its
benefits
compensate
its
drawbacks
.
Labels: O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O