Tokens: 99
.
The
Government
submitted
that
the
applicant
's
claim
in
relation
to
non‑pecuniary
damage
,
with
respect
to
the
loss
of
hypothetical
income
,
did
not
have
a
casual
link
with
the
alleged
violations
of
the
Convention
.
With
regard
to
non
-
pecuniary
damage
,
the
Government
argued
that
the
sum
claimed
by
the
applicant
was
excessive
.
They
invited
the
Court
to
rule
that
the
finding
of
a
violation
constituted
in
itself
sufficient
just
satisfaction
for
the
non
-
pecuniary
damage
sustained
by
the
applicant
.
Labels: O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O