Tokens: Although
the
first
applicant
was
the
owner
and
general
manager
of
the
applicant
company
and
although
the
company
had
its
seat
at
the
first
applicant
’s
law
office
,
he
was
not
the
counsel
or
legal
adviser
of
the
company
.
It
appears
that
the
first
applicant
acted
as
legal
adviser
of
certain
of
the
companies
owned
by
the
second
applicant
.
However
,
it
has
not
been
claimed
that
the
search
and
seizure
carried
out
in
the
first
applicant
’s
law
office
involved
electronic
data
relating
to
any
of
the
subsidiary
companies
of
which
he
was
the
legal
adviser
.
In
these
circumstances
,
we
are
not
satisfied
that
the
applicant
company
may
be
said
to
have
been
affected
by
the
absence
of
procedural
safeguards
designed
to
protect
the
lawyer
-
client
relationship
which
has
been
found
by
the
Court
to
give
rise
to
a
finding
of
a
violation
of
Article
8
of
the
Convention
.
Labels: O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O