Tokens: 2
.
We
should
make
it
clear
at
the
outset
that
our
difference
of
opinion
with
the
majority
relates
not
to
the
general
principles
to
be
applied
in
cases
of
child
abduction
covered
by
the
Hague
Convention
,
on
which
we
are
in
full
agreement
with
the
other
judges
of
the
Court
.
In
particular
,
we
agree
that
,
despite
the
undeniable
impact
that
return
of
the
child
may
have
on
the
rights
of
the
child
and
parents
,
Article
8
does
not
call
for
an
in
-
depth
examination
by
the
judicial
or
other
authorities
of
the
requested
State
of
the
entire
family
situation
of
the
child
in
question
.
We
further
agree
that
the
Article
nevertheless
imposes
on
the
national
authorities
of
that
State
,
when
examining
a
case
under
Article
13
(
b
)
of
the
Hague
Convention
,
to
consider
arguable
claims
of
a
“
grave
risk
”
for
the
child
in
the
event
of
his
or
her
return
and
,
where
such
a
claim
is
found
not
to
be
established
,
to
make
a
ruling
giving
sufficient
reasons
for
rejecting
it
.
Labels: O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O