Tokens: 3
.
The
Court
’s
task
is
not
to
substitute
itself
for
the
domestic
authorities
in
the
exercise
of
their
responsibilities
.
(
see
,
among
other
authorities
,
Hokkanen
v.
Finland
,
23
September
1994
,
§
55
,
Series
A
no
.
299
-
A
,
and
Kutzner
v.
Germany
,
no
.
46544/99
,
§
65
,
ECHR
2002
-
I
)
.
On
the
other
hand
,
we
emphatically
agree
with
the
majority
that
the
Court
is
competent
to
ascertain
whether
the
domestic
courts
,
in
applying
and
interpreting
the
provisions
of
the
Hague
Convention
,
have
secured
the
guarantees
of
the
European
Convention
on
Human
Rights
and
especially
those
of
Article
8
(
see
paragraph
133
of
the
judgment
)
.
In
the
present
case
the
issue
is
therefore
whether
the
guarantees
of
Article
8
were
secured
by
the
Swiss
Federal
Court
in
respect
of
both
applicants
when
deciding
on
and
ordering
the
second
applicant
’s
forced
return
to
Israel
.
Labels: O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O