Tokens: [
99
]
Nothing
in
Varvara
demands
a
sentence
by
a
criminal
court
.
It
is
true
that
the
English
translation
of
Varvara
does
criticise
the
fact
that
“
the
criminal
penalty
...
was
imposed
on
the
applicant
despite
the
fact
that
the
criminal
offence
had
been
time
-
barred
and
his
criminal
liability
had
not
been
established
in
a
verdict
as
to
his
guilt
”
.
But
the
words
“
criminal
liability
”
must
be
read
in
their
context
:
in
the
Varvara
case
,
the
confiscation
had
been
applied
by
the
criminal
court
,
so
its
criminal
character
was
not
a
matter
of
dispute
.
This
is
all
the
clearer
in
the
original
French
version
,
which
takes
issue
merely
with
the
fact
that
the
applicant
’s
“
responsabilité
n’a
pas
été
consignée
dans
un
jugement
de
condamnation
”
(
his
liability
was
not
recorded
in
a
judgment
of
conviction
)
.
Labels: O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O