Tokens: [
27
]
Paragraphs
28
and
30
of
the
judgment
.
The
German
Federal
Court
also
held
that
“
it
is
generally
permitted
to
report
on
statements
that
illegally
impair
third
parties
’
rights
of
personality
,
despite
the
perpetuation
or
even
amplification
of
the
initial
violation
by
means
of
the
dissemination
,
if
there
is
a
predominant
interest
in
the
information
and
the
disseminator
does
not
appropriate
the
reported
statements
as
his
/
her
own
”
(
German
Federal
Court
,
I
ZR
191/08
,
14
October
2010
)
.
That
was
also
my
point
in
the
dissenting
opinion
annexed
to
Mouvement
raëlien
suisse
,
cited
above
.
Labels: O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O