Tokens: 7
.
The
Court
said
that
Mr
Zana
’s
words
“
could
be
interpreted
in
several
ways
but
,
at
all
events
,
they
are
both
contradictory
and
ambiguous
.
They
are
contradictory
because
it
would
seem
difficult
simultaneously
to
support
the
PKK
,
a
terrorist
organisation
which
resorts
to
violence
to
achieve
its
ends
,
and
to
declare
oneself
opposed
to
massacres
;
they
are
ambiguous
because
whilst
Mr
Zana
disapproves
of
the
massacres
of
women
and
children
,
he
at
the
same
time
describes
them
as
“
mistakes
”
that
anybody
could
make
.
”
(
see
§
58
)
.
Labels: O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O