Tokens: The
practical
effect
of
this
line
of
reasoning
is
that
,
ultimately
,
the
Court
has
the
final
word
on
the
assessment
of
the
best
interests
and
the
human
rights
of
the
abducted
child
in
Europe
,
be
this
prior
to
the
execution
of
the
return
order
or
even
after
its
execution
.
This
line
of
reasoning
also
impacts
on
the
remit
of
the
courts
in
the
host
country
in
assessing
return
applications
,
in
so
far
as
they
must
examine
the
situation
of
the
child
and
the
family
in
accordance
with
the
Convention
.
In
Europe
,
the
judge
in
the
host
country
has
to
interpret
Articles
12
,
13
and
20
of
the
Hague
Convention
in
the
light
of
the
Convention
and
the
Court
’s
case
-
law
.
Such
analysis
is
particularly
important
in
cases
of
return
to
States
which
are
not
under
the
jurisdiction
of
the
Court
,
where
the
parties
will
be
unable
subsequently
to
bring
complaints
to
the
Court
if
their
rights
in
the
country
of
habitual
residence
are
breached[33
]
.
Labels: O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O