Tokens: [
13
]
Naidin
v.
Romania
,
no
.
38162/07
,
21
October
2014
(
no
violation
of
Article
8
of
the
Convention
,
in
conjunction
with
Article
14
:
absolute
prohibition
of
public
employment
)
.
In
Haralambie
v.
Romania
,
the
Court
established
an
obligation
to
inform
about
a
person
’s
records
created
by
the
secret
services
during
the
period
of
a
totalitarian
regime
(
no
.
21737/03
,
§
§
87
-
89
,
27
October
2009
;
see
also
Jarnea
v.
Romania
,
no
.
41838/05
,
§
60
,
19
July
2011
)
.
But
the
Convention
does
not
impose
a
specific
obligation
on
the
Contracting
States
to
provide
redress
for
wrongs
or
damage
caused
under
the
general
cover
of
State
authority
prior
to
their
ratification
of
the
Convention
(
see
Kopecký
v.
Slovakia
[
GC
]
,
no
.
44912/98
,
§
38
,
ECHR
2004‑IX
;
Woś
v.
Poland
(
dec
.
)
,
no
.
22860/02
,
§
80
,
ECHR
2005‑IV
;
Woś
v.
Poland
,
no
.
22860/02
,
§
72
,
ECHR
2006‑VII
;
Associazione
Nazionale
Reduci
Dalla
Prigionia
dall’Internamento
e
dalla
Guerra
di
Liberazione
and
Others
v.
Germany
(
dec
.
)
,
no
.
45563/04
,
4
September
2007
;
Epstein
and
Others
v.
Belgium
(
dec
.
)
,
no
.
9717/05
,
ECHR
2008‑
...
(
extracts
)
;
and
Preussische
Treuhand
GmbH
&
Co.
Kg
a.
A.
v.
Poland
(
dec
.
)
,
no
.
47550/06
,
§
64
,
ECHR
2008‑
...
(
extracts
)
)
.
Labels: O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O