Tokens: 22
.
As
the
ICTY
Appeals
Chamber
also
noted
in
Prosecutor
v.
Radislav
Krstić
(
ICTY-98
-
33
-
A
,
appeals
judgment
,
19
April
2004
)
,
the
numerical
size
of
the
targeted
part
of
the
group
was
“
the
necessary
and
important
starting
point
,
though
not
in
all
cases
the
ending
point
of
the
inquiry
”
.
In
addition
to
the
numerical
size
of
the
targeted
portion
,
its
“
prominence
within
the
group
”
was
also
a
useful
consideration
.
If
a
specific
part
of
the
group
was
“
emblematic
of
the
overall
group
”
or
was
“
essential
to
its
survival
”
,
then
that
may
support
a
finding
that
that
part
qualifies
as
substantial
within
the
meaning
of
the
offence
of
genocide
.
Similarly
,
part
of
the
group
could
be
regarded
as
prominent
,
when
its
elimination
could
serve
as
a
“
potent
example
”
to
all
other
members
of
that
group
as
to
their
“
vulnerability
and
defencelessness
”
.
The
“
fate
”
of
part
of
the
group
would
thus
be
“
emblematic
”
of
that
of
all
other
members
of
the
group
(
see
paragraph
101
of
the
present
judgment
)
.
Labels: O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O