Tokens: 6
.
In
the
majority
’s
view
,
the
“
disproportionality
”
of
the
measure
was
supported
by
the
argument
that
the
applicant
,
if
expelled
,
would
not
be
able
to
maintain
her
contacts
with
her
children
and
that
that
would
be
an
extraordinary
burden
for
their
family
life
.
Now
,
apart
from
the
fact
that
with
to
-
day
’s
means
of
communication[4
]
it
can
be
argued
that
expulsion
placed
a
lesser
burden
in
this
respect
than
would
have
been
the
case
had
a
prison
sentence
been
imposed
,
the
domestic
courts
,
during
the
custody
proceedings
,
had
formed
a
favourable
impression
of
the
children
’s
father
as
a
care
person
,
finding
that
,
of
the
two
parents
,
he
was
the
one
more
capable
of
assuming
their
care
.
Moreover
,
the
father
had
during
the
custody
proceedings
undertaken
an
obligation
to
facilitate
contact
between
the
children
and
the
applicant
.
Finally
,
there
was
nothing
to
suggest
that
the
children
had
stronger
links
to
their
mother
than
to
their
father
,
or
that
the
father
’s
ability
to
assume
care
would
be
reduced
in
the
immediate
future
.
In
any
case
,
were
that
to
happen
,
the
applicant
could
apply
for
a
dispensation
from
the
re
-
entry
ban
.
Labels: O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O