Tokens: This
development
is
also
highlighted
in
the
Government
’s
observations
.
They
indicate
that
,
following
the
Constitutional
Court
’s
judgment
no
.
239
of
2009
,
the
Court
of
Cassation
ruled
that
a
confiscation
order
could
be
imposed
only
if
it
was
proved
that
the
accused
person
was
“
responsible
”
,
that
is
,
if
there
was
proof
not
only
of
the
material
element
(
“
elemento
oggetivo
”
)
,
but
also
of
the
subjective
or
mental
element
(
“
elemento
soggettivo
”
)
of
the
unlawful
site
development
(
see
the
Government
’s
observations
summarised
in
paragraphs
203
and
239
(
b
)
of
the
present
judgment
;
the
Government
refer
to
the
judgment
of
the
Court
of
Cassation
of
13
July
2009
-
8
October
2009
,
no
.
39078
,
mentioned
in
paragraphs
121
,
122
and
129
of
the
present
judgment
)
.
They
further
indicate
that
,
by
contrast
,
the
confiscation
of
an
unlawfully
developed
site
could
no
longer
be
ordered
against
those
persons
who
had
not
committed
any
crime
and
who
acted
in
good
faith
(
the
Government
refer
to
the
judgment
of
the
Court
of
Cassation
of
6
October
2010
-
10
November
2010
,
no
.
39715
,
mentioned
in
paragraph
122
of
the
present
judgment
)
.
It
should
be
noted
that
in
its
judgment
no
.
49
of
2015
,
the
Constitutional
Court
emphasised
that
in
criminal
proceedings
the
burden
of
proof
for
establishing
the
bad
faith
of
a
third
-
party
buyer
,
whether
criminally
liable
or
not
,
fell
upon
the
prosecution
.
Labels: O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O