Tokens: I
regret
that
I
can
not
subscribe
to
the
conclusion
of
my
colleagues
who
found
a
violation
of
Article
8
of
the
Convention
in
the
present
case
.
Apart
from
the
complex
and
sensitive
nature
of
the
case
,
I
agree
with
the
Government
’s
observations
in
which
they
state
that
any
delay
in
the
proceedings
was
not
caused
by
the
authorities
,
but
rather
by
the
applicant
himself
(
see
paragraphs
78
-
83
of
the
judgment
)
,
and
that
there
was
no
interference
with
the
applicant
’s
right
to
respect
for
his
family
life
(
see
paragraph
84
of
the
judgment
)
.
If
the
national
court
finds
that
the
return
would
be
harmful
to
the
child
,
so
that
the
decision
is
not
in
favour
of
the
applicant
,
then
the
time
factor
does
not
matter
.
The
positive
obligations
should
not
be
limited
to
the
expeditious
return
of
the
child
;
it
takes
time
to
be
sure
that
the
child
’s
return
is
not
harmful
in
order
to
avoid
mistakes
like
the
ones
which
were
made
in
the
case
of
X
v.
Latvia
(
[
GC
]
,
no
.
27853/09
,
ECHR
2013
)
.
Labels: O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O