Tokens: 3
.
In
my
opinion
,
this
legal
framework
in
general
and
the
rulings
of
the
national
courts
in
the
applicant
’s
case
in
particular
can
not
be
considered
as
manifestly
unreasonable
or
overly
formalistic
.
In
order
to
ensure
the
rational
and
fair
conduct
of
proceedings
,
any
reasonable
legal
system
limits
the
possibilities
of
parties
to
modify
or
amend
their
claims
.
What
is
more
,
some
legal
systems
expect
claimants
to
specify
the
legal
characterisation
of
their
claims
at
the
beginning
of
the
proceedings
,
with
the
courts
being
bound
by
that
legal
characterisation
.
In
itself
,
such
an
expectation
is
not
incompatible
with
any
Convention
requirement
.
One
should
not
forget
that
the
facts
of
a
case
can
never
be
entirely
separated
from
the
law
and
,
vice
versa
,
the
law
can
not
be
fully
separated
from
the
facts
.
When
legally
assessing
a
certain
course
of
events
over
time
,
one
has
to
identify
the
relevant
facts
in
the
light
of
the
legal
provisions
.
On
the
other
hand
,
it
is
necessary
to
ascertain
which
legal
provisions
from
the
entire
legal
order
might
form
the
normative
constituent
elements
of
the
case
.
In
some
instances
this
may
prove
to
be
a
complicated
operation
,
requiring
gradual
reflection
on
an
event
in
the
light
of
the
legal
provisions
and
vice
versa
.
The
normative
constituent
elements
of
the
case
and
the
relevant
facts
respectively
form
the
premissa
maior
and
premissa
minor
of
the
legal
syllogism
,
allowing
for
a
conclusion
as
to
their
correspondence
.
Labels: O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O