Tokens: 63
.
In
respect
of
the
claim
for
pecuniary
damage
the
Court
observes
that
,
at
least
until
25
May
2011
,
the
applicant
appears
not
to
have
paid
at
all
on
the
writ
of
execution
concerning
child
support
(
see
paragraph
13
above
)
.
It
then
notes
that
under
domestic
law
it
is
open
to
the
applicant
to
request
reopening
of
the
case
(
see
paragraph
28
above
)
.
The
Court
considers
that
reopening
of
the
proceedings
should
give
the
possibility
to
determine
the
applicant
’s
real
filiation
and
also
settle
the
question
of
the
child
maintenance
payments
.
The
Court
therefore
rejects
this
claim
.
Labels: O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O