Tokens: At
this
point
I
would
like
to
underline
the
need
for
a
clear
distinguishing
of
the
present
case
from
the
one
of
Klass
and
Others
v.
Germany
(
6
September
1978
,
Series
A
no
.
28
)
.
The
Court
held
in
Klass
and
Others
that
there
had
been
interference
on
the
grounds
that
the
legislation
in
itself
had
constituted
it
,
because
of
its
character
(
see
Klass
and
Others
,
cited
above
,
§
§
34
-
26
)
.
In
the
case
at
stake
the
character
of
primary
legislation
is
permissive
,
which
represents
the
ground
for
distinguishing
the
present
case
from
the
situation
in
Klass
and
Others
.
The
legislation
contested
in
Klass
and
Others
was
substantially
restrictive
and
potentially
harmful
to
the
enjoyment
of
human
rights
.
The
Hungarian
health
legislation
could
not
be
considered
to
be
such
,
even
assuming
the
existence
of
a
necessity
of
completing
it
by
secondary
legislation
.
Labels: O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O