Tokens: 108
.
The
Court
’s
case
-
law
is
not
consistent
on
the
scope
of
the
concept
of
“
person
of
unsound
mind
”
under
Article
5
§
1
(
e
)
of
the
Convention
.
It
is
telling
that
the
draft
Therapy
Placement
Act
explicitly
refers
to
the
case
-
law
of
the
Court
and
the
Commission
,
such
as
X.
v.
Germany
,
[
280
]
in
order
to
argue
that
the
concept
of
person
of
unsound
mind
includes
people
with
abnormal
personality
features
not
equated
to
a
mental
illness[281
]
.
The
draft
law
also
referred
to
Hutchison
Reid
v.
the
United
Kingdom
[
282
]
and
Morsink
v.
the
Netherlands
[
283
]
to
make
the
point
that
the
criminal
liability
of
an
offender
does
not
exclude
the
possibility
of
confinement
under
Article
5
§
1
(
e
)
of
the
Convention
,
which
would
allow
for
systematic
and
unlimited
confinement
of
offenders
independent
from
the
question
of
their
criminal
liability
and
,
even
more
,
regardless
of
the
impossibility
of
clinical
treatment.[284
]
Labels: O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O