Tokens: 148
.
The
Court
also
notes
that
it
has
concluded
that
the
properties
described
in
paragraph
8
above
were
not
a
“
possession
”
of
the
applicant
(
see
paragraph
50
above
)
and
that
it
has
found
that
there
has
been
no
violation
of
Articles
3
,
5
,
6
,
7
,
11
,
13
and
14
(
read
in
conjunction
with
Articles
5
,
6
and
7
)
of
the
Convention
.
Therefore
,
no
award
should
be
made
on
that
account
.
Labels: O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O