Tokens: The
majority
also
failed
to
specify
(
compare
and
contrast
Calvelli
and
Ciglio
v.
Italy
[
GC
]
,
no
.
32967/96
,
ECHR
2002‑I
)
whether
a
civil
-
law
remedy
–
if
available
–
might
in
principle
have
sufficed
for
the
appropriate
protection
of
the
applicant
and
instead
addressed
the
fact
that
the
criminal
courts
did
not
award
any
compensation
for
damage
resulting
from
a
crime
as
the
impugned
acts
did
not
constitute
a
crime
.
In
this
regard
the
applicant
insisted
that
–
being
the
masters
of
the
classification
of
the
law
–
the
criminal
courts
should
have
reclassified
and
determined
her
claim
on
other
grounds
.
However
,
she
never
complained
about
the
lack
of
such
a
remedy
in
the
civil
courts
(
see
paragraph
64
)
.
I
remain
unconvinced
that
the
fact
that
the
criminal
courts
dismissed
the
applicant
’s
civil
claim
for
damages
resulting
from
a
crime
suffices
to
conclude
that
no
other
civil
remedy
existed
under
Swedish
law
to
redress
the
substance
of
her
complaints
(
see
paragraph
117
)
.
Labels: O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O