Tokens: 26
.
The
applicant
claimed
non
-
pecuniary
damage
for
the
invasion
of
his
privacy
.
He
drew
attention
to
the
facts
that
the
interceptions
took
place
over
a
long
period
of
time
(
August
1995
-
January
1996
)
and
were
indiscriminate
,
in
that
every
message
on
his
pager
was
copied
.
He
pointed
out
,
furthermore
,
that
since
the
Malone
v.
the
United
Kingdom
judgment
of
2
August
1984
(
Series
A
no
.
95
)
,
the
Government
had
been
aware
of
the
need
to
regulate
covert
surveillance
by
the
police
.
Labels: O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O