Tokens: On
the
one
hand
,
the
majority
confirm
Sud
Fondi
(
cited
above
)
in
so
far
as
the
Court
held
that
confiscation
orders
in
the
area
of
unlawful
site
development
were
“
penalties
”
within
the
meaning
of
Article
7
(
see
paragraph
233
of
the
judgment
)
.
They
also
confirm
Sud
Fondi
and
Varvara
(
cited
above
)
in
so
far
as
the
Court
considered
that
Article
7
required
,
for
such
a
“
penalty
”
to
be
imposed
,
that
there
be
some
personal
liability
of
the
owner
of
the
confiscated
property
(
see
paragraph
242
of
the
judgment
)
.
In
our
view
,
the
Court
should
rather
have
seized
the
opportunity
to
overrule
these
decisions
.
Labels: O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O