Tokens: The
fact
that
the
first
applicant
acted
“
wrongfully
”
within
the
meaning
of
the
Hague
Convention
is
in
my
opinion
only
relevant
for
determining
whether
an
obligation
to
return
a
child
at
all
arises
under
that
Convention
.
In
this
respect
it
should
not
be
overlooked
that
she
had
in
fact
done
what
could
reasonably
be
expected
of
her
in
the
situation
she
faced
,
namely
to
ask
the
Israeli
court
to
lift
the
ban
on
the
child
’s
removal
from
Israel
.
However
,
her
request
was
rejected
without
any
apparent
consideration
of
her
personal
situation
or
the
best
interests
of
the
child
.
Her
reaction
to
the
consequences
of
such
a
categorical
refusal
is
understandable
,
albeit
“
wrongful
”
under
the
Hague
Convention
.
Labels: O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O