Tokens: 36
.
The
really
determining
element
in
the
conclusion
arrived
at
by
the
Court
seems
to
have
been
fear
of
the
supposed
consequences
that
might
result
from
any
failure
to
read
a
right
of
access
into
Article
6.1
(
art
.
6
-
1
)
.
This
can
clearly
be
seen
from
the
following
passages
,
the
first
of
which
completes
that
already
quoted
in
paragraph
33
above
by
stating
that
the
"
fair
,
public
and
expeditious
characteristics
of
judicial
proceedings
are
of
no
value
at
all
if
there
are
no
judicial
proceedings
"
.
Still
more
significant
is
the
second
passage
(
Judgment
,
paragraph
35
,
penultimate
section
)
,
the
first
sentence
of
which
reads
as
follows
:
Labels: O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O