Tokens: I
fully
agree
with
this
conclusion
and
I
join
the
majority
in
finding
a
violation
of
Article
8
with
regard
to
the
monitoring
of
the
applicant
's
correspondence
with
the
Court
before
21
December
2005
.
This
conclusion
was
based
on
the
fact
that
a
considerable
number
of
the
applicant
's
letters
were
opened
and
that
some
of
them
were
accompanied
by
letters
and
summaries
produced
by
SIZO
officials
as
well
as
on
the
view
that
“
the
applicable
legislation
...
did
not
indicate
with
reasonable
clarity
the
scope
and
manner
of
exercise
of
the
discretion
conferred
on
the
public
authorities
in
respect
of
the
monitoring
of
detainees
'
correspondence
”
(
paragraph
57
)
.
Labels: O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O