Tokens: 13
.
Two
critical
claims
regarding
the
nature
of
the
Court
’s
case
-
law
are
implicit
in
this
line
of
argument
,
and
they
have
been
made
explicit
in
subsequent
constitutional
case
-
law
.
On
the
one
hand
,
for
the
Consulta
,
the
Court
’s
judgments
are
too
case
-
specific
and
atomistic[70
]
,
since
they
are
very
much
dependent
on
the
context
and
the
individual
circumstances
of
each
case
.
In
view
of
the
precedent
-
oriented
nature
of
the
Court
’s
jurisprudence
,
which
warrants
a
long
consolidation
of
its
principles
,
not
every
judgment
can
be
recognised
as
representing
the
Court
’s
case
-
law
.
On
the
other
hand
,
in
the
Consulta
’s
eyes
,
the
Strasbourg
judgments
are
too
simplistic
and
linear
,
because
they
take
into
account
only
the
subjective
interests
at
stake
,
not
all
the
involved
objective
interests
;
thus
the
Court
’s
case
-
law
does
not
consider
fully
the
peculiarity
of
the
Italian
legal
order[71
]
.
If
need
be
,
the
Constitutional
Court
may
repeat
the
balancing
of
interests
performed
by
Strasbourg
in
the
light
of
the
objective
interests
prevailing
in
the
Italian
constitutional
order[72
]
.
It
is
precisely
for
that
reason
that
a
certain
margin
of
appreciation
should
be
accorded
to
the
domestic
authorities
in
the
implementation
of
the
Court
’s
judgments[73
]
.
Labels: O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O