Tokens: [
120
]
Among
others
,
see
Cleve
v.
Germany
,
no
.
48144/09
,
15
January
2015
,
and
Sekanina
v.
Austria
,
no
.
13126/87
,
25
August
1993
.
Incidentally
,
the
Constitutional
Court
misconstrues
the
Court
’s
case
-
law
when
making
the
case
for
a
substantive
declaration
of
guilt
.
The
most
egregious
example
is
its
use
of
Minelli
v.
Switzerland
,
no
.
8660/79
,
25
March
1983
,
to
support
the
proposition
that
“
[
i]t
is
not
about
the
form
of
the
judgment
but
about
its
substance
”
(
Constitutional
Court
judgment
,
§
6.2
)
.
What
this
Court
said
in
§
37
of
Minelli
is
that
even
in
formal
acquittals
a
domestic
court
can
violate
the
presumption
of
innocence
by
making
assertions
about
an
accused
’s
guilt
.
But
while
this
Court
describes
the
phenomenon
to
make
it
clear
that
it
is
banned
,
the
Constitutional
Court
described
the
same
phenomenon
to
empower
domestic
courts
to
carry
on
with
such
practice
.
This
is
not
even
an
application
in
malam
partem
of
a
principle
;
it
is
a
complete
subversion
of
it
.
Labels: O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O