Tokens: We
do
not
call
into
question
the
Court
’s
case
-
law
to
the
effect
that
the
Act
was
formulated
in
vague
and
general
terms
and
did
not
afford
an
individual
adequate
protection
against
arbitrariness
(
see
Khamidov
v.
Russia
,
no
.
72118/01
,
§
143
,
15
November
2007
)
.
However
,
we
are
not
convinced
that
the
general
deficiencies
in
the
Act
are
sufficient
,
in
this
particular
case
,
to
conclude
that
the
interference
was
not
lawful
.
In
any
event
,
we
would
prefer
to
concentrate
on
the
issue
of
whether
the
operation
of
27
December
2005
complied
with
domestic
law
,
in
particular
the
Act
.
Labels: O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O