text: několik partnerských zemí a které se mohou týkat jednoho nebo více členských států;(c) programů přeshraniční spolupráce týkajících se spolupráce mezi jedním nebo více členskými státy a jednou nebo více partnerskými zeměmi a realizovaných v regionech sousedících se sdílenou částí vnější hranice Evropského společenství.(2) Pomoc Společenství může být podle tohoto nařízení poskytována na spolupráci mezi regiony zahrnující partnerské země a členské státy v souvislosti s tematickými programy a programy pokrývajícími více zemí určenými pro regionální a subregionální spolupráci.Článek 7Programování a přidělování finančních prostředků(1) Pro programy pokrývajícími jednu zemi nebo více zemí a pro tematické programy se postupem podle čl. 26 odst. 2 přijmou strategické dokumenty. Strategické dokumenty odrážejí rámec politiky a akční plány uvedené v článku 3. Strategické dokumenty se vytvářejí pro období odpovídající prioritám stanoveným v rámci politiky a obsahují víceleté orientační programy včetně orientačních víceletých finančních přídělů. Přezkoumávají se v případě potřeby a mohou být podrobeny revizi postupem podle čl. 26 odst. 2.(2) Při vytváření programů pokrývajících jednu zemi nebo více zemí stanoví Komise příděly pro každý program s ohledem na zvláštní charakteristiky a potřeby dotčené země nebo regionu, úroveň cílů partnerství Unie s danou zemí, kapacitu řízení a potenciál pro čerpání finančních prostředků.(3) Za výhradním účelem přeshraniční spolupráce a pro vytvoření seznamu společných programů uvedených v čl. 9 odst. 1, jejich orientačních víceletých přídělů a územních jednotek způsobilých k účasti v každém programu se postupem podle čl. 26 odst. 2 přijme jeden nebo více specifických strategických dokumentů. Takový specifický strategický dokument (takové strategické dokumenty) v podstatě pokryje období sedmi let od 1. ledna 2007 do 31. prosince 2013.(4) Evropský fond pro regionální rozvoj přispívá na programy přeshraniční spolupráce vytvořené a prováděné podle ustanovení tohoto nařízení. Celkový rozpočet, který bude přidělen na programy přeshraniční spolupráce včetně příspěvku z Evropského fondu pro regionální rozvoj na financování opatření na hranicích s partnerskými zeměmi, bude odpovídat nejméně dvojnásobku částky stanovené v příslušných ustanoveních nařízení (ES) č. (...( o obecných ustanoveních o Evropském fondu pro regionální rozvoj, Evropském sociálním fondu a Fondu soudržnosti pro opatření v oblastech na hranici s partnerskými zeměmi.(5) V případě krizí nebo ohrožení demokracie, právního státu, lidských práv nebo základních svobod se může k provedení přezkumu ad hoc strategických dokumentů použít nouzový postup. Tento přezkum zajistí koherenci mezi pomocí Společenství poskytovanou podle tohoto nařízení a pomocí poskytovanou na základě jiných finančních nástrojů Společenství včetně nařízení (ES) č. [...] o zřízení nástroje stability.HLAVA IIIPŘESHRANIČNÍ SPOLUPRÁCEČlánek 8Zeměpisné vymezení oblastí, na které lze poskytnout podporu(1) Programy přeshraniční spolupráce uvedené v čl. 6 odst. 1 písm. c) se mohou týkat všech pozemních hranic a všech přímořských zón podél společného moře. Pomoc podle této hlavy může být poskytnuta těmto územním jednotkám:(a) všechny územní jednotky odpovídající úrovni NUTS III nebo podobné podél pozemní hranice mezi členskými státy a partnerskými zeměmi,(b) všechny územní jednotky odpovídající úrovni NUTS III nebo podobné podél námořních cest podstatného významu,(c) všechny pobřežní územní jednotky odpovídající úrovni NUTS II nebo podobné hraničící s mořem společným členským státům a partnerským zemím.(2) Ve zvláštních případech může být poskytování podpory rozšířeno na územní jednotky sousedící


text: s územními jednotkami uvedenými v odstavci 1.(3) Komise vymezí ve strategickém dokumentu podle čl. 7 odst. 3 tohoto nařízení na základě vzdálenosti a dalších relevantních zeměpisných a hospodářských kritérií seznam námořních cest podstatného významu.Článek 9Programování(1) Přeshraniční spolupráce podle tohoto nařízení probíhá v rámci víceletých programů týkajících se spolupráce na hranici nebo skupině hranic a zahrnujících víceletá opatření, která jsou zaměřena na konzistentní soubor priorit a která mohou být prováděna s podporou Společenství (dále jen „společné programy“). Společné programy vycházejí ze specifického strategického dokumentu (specifických strategických dokumentů) uvedeného v čl. 7 odst 3.(2) Společné programy pro pozemní hranice a námořní cesty se zřizují pro jednotlivé hranice a zahrnují územní jednotky, kterým lze poskytnout pomoc, patřící jednomu nebo více členským státům a jedné nebo více partnerským zemím. Společné programy pro pobřežní regiony jsou multilaterální a týkají se územních jednotek, kterým lze poskytnout pomoc, hraničícím se společným mořem patřícím několika zúčastněným zemím, včetně nejméně jednoho členského státu a jedné partnerské země.(3) Jiné země než zúčastněné země, které se nacházejí podél společného moře, se mohou v případě zřízení společného programu k tomuto společnému programu připojit a mít prospěch z pomoci Společenství za podmínek stanovených v prováděcích pravidlech uvedených v článku 11.(4) Zúčastněné země do jednoho roku od schválení strategického dokumentu uvedeného v čl. 7 odst. 3 společně předloží Komisi návrhy společných programů. Komise přijme každý společný program po zhodnocení jeho souladu s tímto nařízením a prováděcími pravidly.(5) Společné programy mohou být z iniciativy zúčastněných zemí nebo Komise podrobeny revizi za účelem zohlednění změn v prioritách spolupráce, sociálně-ekonomického pokroku, výsledků pozorovaných při provádění dotčených opatření a procesu sledování a hodnocení a za účelem provedení úpravy dostupných částek pomoci a změny v přidělení zdrojů.(6) Po přijetí společných programů uzavře Komise se zúčastněnými státy podle příslušných ustanovení nařízení (ES) č. 1605/2002 ze dne 25. června 2002, kterým se stanoví finanční nařízení o souhrnném rozpočtu Evropských společenství[15], dohodu o financování.(7) Zúčastněné země s ohledem na zásadu partnerství společně vybírají akce, které jsou v souladu s prioritami a opatřeními společného programu, který obdrží pomoc Společenství.(8) Ve výjimečných případech, pokud není možné zřídit společný program v důsledku problémů vzniklým ve vztazích mezi zúčastněnými zeměmi, může Komise přijmout program, který není společným programem ve smyslu tohoto článku, ale který umožňuje hraničnímu regionu nebo dotčeným regionům členského státu mít prospěch z pomoci stanovené tímto nařízením.Článek 10Řízení programů(1) Společné programy se zpravidla provádějí prostřednictvím společného řídicího orgánu, který sídlí v členském státě.(2) Zúčastněné země mohou ve výjimečných případech navrhnout Komisi, aby společný řídicí orgán sídlil v partnerské zemi, pokud je určený orgán schopen plně uplatňovat kritéria stanovená v relevantních ustanoveních nařízení (ES) č. 1605/2002.(3) „Společný řídicí orgán“ znamená jakýkoli veřejný nebo soukromý úřad nebo orgán, včetně státu samotného, na vnitrostátní, regionální nebo místní úrovni, jenž je určen společně členským státem nebo členskými státy a partnerskou zemí nebo partnerskými zeměmi, které se podílejí na společném programu, jenž má finanční a správní kapacitu pro řízení pomoci Společenství a jenž je právně způsobilý uzavírat dohody nezbytné pro účel tohoto nařízení.(4) Společný řídicí orgán odpovídá za řízení

type: legislation

jurisdiction: EU


text: a provádění společného programu podle zásady řádného finančního řízení a za zajištění legality a řádnosti své činnosti. Za tímto účelem zavede vhodné systémy a normy řízení, kontroly a účetnictví.Článek 11Prováděcí pravidla(1) Prováděcí pravidla, kterými se zavedou specifická ustanovení pro provádění této hlavy, se přijmou postupem podle čl. 26 odst. 2.(2) Mezi záležitosti, kterých se prováděcí pravidla týkají, patří kritéria a postupy pro přidělování finančních prostředků, výše spolufinancování, příprava společných programů, společný výběr projektů, technické a finanční řízení pomoci, finanční kontrola a audit, sledování a vyhodnocování, viditelnost a publicita.HLAVA IVPROVÁDĚNÍČlánek 12Přijímání akčních programů(1) Komise přijme, za normálních okolností jednou ročně, akční programy vytvořené na základě strategických dokumentů uvedených v čl. 7 odst. 1.Ve výjimečných případech, například, pokud nebyl akční program ještě přijat, může Komise na základě strategických dokumentů a víceletých orientačních programů uvedených v čl. 7 přijmout opatření, která nejsou stanovena v akčním programu, a to za stejných pravidel a steným postupem, který se používá pro akční programy.(2) Akční programy specifikují sledované cíle, oblasti pomoci, očekávané výsledky, řídicí postupy a celkovou plánovanou částku financování. Obsahují popis operací, které mají být financovány, informaci o částkách přidělených pro každou operaci a orientační harmonogram provádění.(3) U přeshraniční spolupráce přijímá Komise společné programy postupem podle článku 9.(4) Komise pošle akční programy a společné programy přeshraniční spolupráce do jednoho měsíce od přijetí rozhodnutí pro informaci členským státům.Článek 13Přijetí zvláštních opatření, která nejsou stanovena ve strategických dokumentech ani ve víceletých orientačních programech(1) V případě neočekávané potřeby nebo neočekávaných okolností přijme Komise zvláštní opatření, která nejsou stanovena ve strategických dokumentech ani ve víceletých orientačních programech (dále jen „zvláštní opatření“).Zvláštní opatření mohou být také použita k financování činností usnadňujících přechod od mimořádné pomoci k dlouhodobým rozvojovým činnostem včetně činností, jejichž cílem je zajištění lepší připravenosti veřejnosti na zvládání opakujících se krizí.(2) Pokud náklady na taková opatření překročí 15 milionů EUR, přijme je Komise konzultačním postupem podle čl. 26 odst. 3.Postup uvedený v čl. 26 odst. 3 nemusí být používán pro změny zvláštních opatření, jakými jsou například ty, kterými se provádí technické úpravy, prodlužuje lhůta pro provádění, mění přidělení položek v rámci předpokládaného rozpočtu nebo se zvyšuje rozpočet o méně než 20% původního rozpočtu, a to za předpokladu, že tyto změny neovlivňují prvotní cíle stanovené v rozhodnutí Komise.(3) Zvlástní opatření specifikují sledované cíle, oblasti činnosti, očekávané výsledky, použité řídicí postupy a celkovou plánovanou částku financování. Obsahují popis operací, které mají být financovány, informaci o částkách přidělených pro každou operaci a orientační harmonogram provádění.(4) Komise pošle zvláštní opatření do jednoho měsíce po přijetí rozhodnutí pro informaci členským státům.Článek 14ZpůsobilostNa financování podle tohoto nařízení za účelem provádění akčních programů, společných programů přeshraniční spolupráce a zvláštních opatření mají nárok:(a) partnerské země a regiony a jejich instituce;(b) decentralizované orgány v partnerských zemích, jako například regiony, departmenty, provincie a obce;(c) společné orgány zřízené partnerskými zeměmi a regiony a Společenstvím;(d) mezinárodní organizace včetně regionálních organizací, organizací, služeb a misí OSN, mezinárodních finančních institucí a rozvojových bank, pokud tyto přispívají k naplňování cílů tohoto nařízení;(e) orgány a institucemi Společenství, ale pouze pro účely provádění podpůrných opatření druhu


text: uvedeného v článku 16;(f) agentury Evropské unie;(g) následující subjekty a orgány členských států, partnerských zemí a regionů a jakýchkoliv jiných třetích zemí, které splňují pravidla pro přístup k vnější pomoci Společenství podle článku 21, pokud přispívají k dosahování cílů tohoto nařízení:i. veřejné nebo polostátní orgány, místní úřady nebo správy a jejich konsorcia,ii. společnosti, firmy a jiné soukromé organizace a podniky,iii. finanční instituce, které poskytují, podporují a financují soukromé investice v partnerských zemích a regionech,iv. nestátní subjekty definované v bodě h),v. fyzické osoby;h) následující nestátní subjekty:i. nevládní organizace,ii. organizace zastupující domorodé obyvatelstvo,iii. místní sdružení občanů a asociace obchodníků,iv. družstva, odbory, organizace zastupující ekonomické a sociální zájmy,v. místní organizace (včetně sítí) podílející se na decentralizované VI.vi. spotřebitelské organizace, ženské a mládežnické organizace, výukové, kulturní, výzkumné a vědecké organizace,vii. univerzity,viii. církve a náboženská sdružení a komunity,ix. média,x. jakákoli nevládní sdružení a nezávislé nadace, které mohou přispět k rozvoji;i) jakýkoli orgán nebo subjekt nezbytný pro dosaženi cilů tohoto nařizení.Článek 15Druhy opatření(1) Pomoc Společenství se použije na financování programů, projektů a jakéhokoli druhu opatření přispívajících k dosažení cílů tohoto nařízení. Má podobu nevratných grantů.(2) Pomoc Společenství může také být použita na:(a) financování cílených opatření administrativní spolupráce zahrnujících odborníky z veřejného sektoru vyslané z členských států podle konkrétně stanovených pravidel;(b) podporu rozpočtu určitého odvětví nebo na podporu souhrnného rozpočtu, pokud je řízení veřejných výdajů v partnerské zemi dostatečně průhledné, spolehlivé a efektivní a pokud přijalo správně formulované odvětvové nebo makroekonomické politiky schválené hlavními dárci včetně mezinárodních finančních institucí, pokud je to relevantní;(c) programy oddlužení;(d) příspěvky pro Evropskou investiční banku nebo jiné finanční prostředníky v souladu s ustanoveními článku 23, a to na financování půjček, majetkové účasti, garanční fondy nebo investiční fondy;(e) poskytnutí úrokových příspěvků, zejména pro půjčky v oblasti životního prostředí;(f) pojištění neobchodních rizik;(g) příspěvek do fondu zřízeného mezinárodními nebo regionálními organizacemi, jinými dárci nebo partnerskými zeměmi;(h) příspěvek ke kapitálu mezinárodních finančních institucí nebo regionálních rozvojových bank;(i) financování nákladů nezbytných pro účinnou správu projektů a programů a účinný dozor nad projekty a programy ze strany zemí, které jsou příjemci pomoci Společenství;(j) potravinovou pomoc;(k) jiné účely v případě potřeby.Článek 16Podpůrná opatření(1) Financování ze strany Společenství se může týkat také výdajů spojených s takovými činnostmi, jako jsou příprava, dozor, sledování, provádění auditů a hodnocení, které jsou přímo nezbytné pro provádění tohoto nařízení a pro dosažení jeho cílů, jako například výdaje na studie, schůze, informace, zvyšování informovanosti, školení a publikační činnosti, výdaje souvisejících s počítačovými sítěmi sloužícími k výměně informací a k jakékoli jiné výdaje na administrativní nebo technickou pomoc, které Komise může vynaložit v souvislosti s řízením programu. Kryje také výdaje delegací Komise na poskytování administrativní podpory nezbytné pro řízení operací financovaných podle tohoto nařízení.(2) Tato podpůrná opatření nemusí být nezbytně pokryta víceletým programováním, a proto mohou být financována mimo rámec strategických dokumentů a víceletých orientačních programů. Mohou však být financována také v rámci víceletých orientačních programů. Komise přijme podpůrná opatření, která nejsou zahrnuta ve víceletých orientačních programech, podle článku 13.Článek 17Spolufinancování(1) Opatření financovaná podle tohoto nařízení mají nárok na spolufinancování mimo jiné od:(a) členských států, a zejména


text: jejich veřejných a polostátních institucí;(b) jiných dárcovských zemí, a zejména jejich veřejných a polostátních institucí;(c) mezinárodních organizací včetně regionálních organizací, a zejména mezinárodních a regionálních finančních institucí;(d) společností, firem, jiných soukromých organizací a podniků a jiných nestátních subjektů;(e) partnerských zemí a regionů, které jsou příjemci finanční pomoci.(2) V případě paralelního spolufinancování je projekt nebo program rozdělen do několika zřetelně odlišitelných dílčích projektů, z nichž každý je financován jiným partnerem, který poskytuje spolufinancování takovým způsobem, že konečné použití finančních prostředků lze vždy identifikovat. V případě společného spolufinancování sdílejí partneři, kteří zajišťují spolufinancování, celkové náklady na projekt nebo program a zdroje se sloučí takovým způsobem, že není možné identifikovat zdroj finančních prostředků pro danou činnost provedenou jako součást projektu nebo programu.(3) V případě společného spolufinancování může Komise obdržet a spravovat finanční prostředky jménem orgánů uvedených v odst. 1 písm. a), b) a c) za účelem provádění společných opatření. S takovými finančními prostředky se zachází jako s účelově vázaným příjmem podle článku 18 nařízení (ES) č. 1605/2002.Článek 18Řídicí postupy(1) Komise provádí operace podle tohoto nařízení v souladu s nařízením (ES) č. 1605/2002.(2) V případě spolufinancování a v jiných řádně odůvodněných případech může Komise svěřit úkoly veřejné moci, a zejména úkoly plnění rozpočtu, subjektům uvedeným v čl. 54 odst. 2 písm. c) nařízení (ES) č. 1605/2002.(3) Komise uzavře s partnerskými zeměmi rámcové dohody, které stanoví všechna opatření nezbytná pro zajištění účinného provádění pomoci Společenství a ochrany finančních zájmů Společenství.(4) V případě decentralizovaného řízení se může Komise rozhodnout použít postupy pro zadávání zakázek nebo poskytování grantů přijímající partnerské země nebo regionu, pokud:- postupy přijímající partnerské země nebo regionu splňují zásady průhlednosti, proporcionality, rovného zacházení a nediskriminace a brání veškerým střetům zájmů;- se přijímající partnerská země nebo region zaváží pravidelně kontrolovat, zda jsou operace financované z rozpočtu Společenství řádně prováděny, přijmout vhodná opatření k předcházení nesrovnalostí a podvodů a v případě nutnosti zahájit právní řízení za účelem zpětného získání neprávem vyplacených prostředků.Článek 19Rozpočtové závazky(1) Rozpočtové závazky budou přijaty na základě rozhodnutí učiněných Komisí podle čl. 9 odst. 5, čl. 12 odst. 1, čl. 13 odst. 1 a čl. 16 odst. 3.(2) Rozpočtové závazky pro opatření trvající po několik rozpočtových roků mohou být rozděleny do ročních splátek na několik let.(3) Financování ze strany Společenství může mít mimo jiné jednu z následujících právních podob:- dohody o financování;- dohody o grantech;- zakázky;- pracovní smlouvy.Článek 20Ochrana finančních zájmů Společenství(1) Veškeré dohody vyplývající z tohoto nařízení obsahují ustanovení zaručující ochranu finančních zájmů Společenství, zejména v souvislosti s podvody, korupcí a jakýmikoli dalšími nesrovnalostmi, podle nařízení Rady (ES, Euratom) č. 2988/95, č. 2185/96 a č. 1073/99.(2) Dohody výslovně zmocní Komisi a Účetní dvůr k provádění auditů na základě dokladů a auditů na místě u všech dodavatelů či subdodavatelů, kteří obdrželi finanční prostředky Společenství. Kromě toho také výslovně oprávní Komisi k provádění kontrol a inspekcí na místě stanovených v nařízení (ES, Euratom) č. 2185/96.(3) eškeré smlouvy uzavřené v souvislosti s prováděním pomoci zajistí práva Komise a Účetního dvora podle odstavce 2 tohoto článku na dobu během plnění a po splnění smluv.Článek 21Účast na


text: zadávání zakázek a poskytování grantů(1) Účast na zadávání zakázek nebo poskytování grantů financovaných podle tohoto nařízení je umožněna všem fyzickým nebo právnickým osobám z členských států Evropského společenství v oblasti působnosti Smluv.(2) Účast na zadávání zakázek nebo poskytování grantů financovaných podle tohoto nařízení je umožněna všem fyzickým nebo právnickým osobám z:- jakékoliv země, která je příjemcem podle tohoto nařízení,- jakékoliv země, která je příjemcem předvstupního nástroje,- jakéhokoliv členského státu Evropského hospodářského prostoru.(3) Účast na zadávání zakázek nebo poskytování grantů financovaných podle tohoto nařízení je umožněna mezinárodním organizacím.(4) Komise se může rozhodnout umožnit, zcela nebo částečně, účast na zadávání zakázek nebo poskytování grantů financovaných podle tohoto nařízení fyzickým nebo právnickým osobám jakékoliv jiné země v případech, kdy byl sjednán vzájemný přístup k vnější pomoci.(5) Odborníci navrhovaní v souvislosti s postupy pro zadávání zakázek nemusí splňovat výše uvedená pravidla pro státní příslušnost.(6) Všechny dodávky a materiály získané na základě zakázek financovaných podle tohoto nařízení musejí pocházet ze Společenství nebo ze země způsobilé podle odstavce 2.(7) Komise může v řádně odůvodněných případech povolit účast fyzických a právnických osob ze zemí, které mají tradiční hospodářské, obchodní nebo zeměpisné vazby se sousedními zeměmi, nebo z třetích zemí, a použití dodávek a materiálů jiného původu.(8) Pokud je pomoc poskytovaná podle tohoto nařízení řízena společným řídicím orgánem podle článku 10, pokud jsou jí pověřeny vnitrostátní orgány podle článku 18 nebo pokud je řízena společně s mezinárodními organizacemi, použijí se ta pravidla o zadávání zakázek, včetně pravidel pro účast na zadávání zakázek a poskytování grantů, a ta pravidla o původu, která používá řídicí orgán. Účast na zadávání zakázek a poskytování grantů je umožněna všem fyzickým i právnickým osobám uvedeným v odstavcích 1, 2, 3 a 4 tohoto článku a všem fyzickým a právnickým osobám z jakékoli jiné země v souladu s pravidly řídicího orgánu.Článek 22Předběžné financováníÚrok vzniklý na základě předběžných plateb příjemcům se odečte od konečné platby.Článek 23Finanční prostředky, které jsou dány k dispozici Evropské investiční bance nebo jiným finančním zprostředkovatelům(1) Finanční prostředky podle čl. 15 odst. 2 písm. c) spravují finanční zprostředkovatelé, Evropská investiční banka nebo jakákoliv jiná banka nebo organizace, která je schopna je spravovat.(2) Komise musí přijmout prováděcí ustanovení pro odstavec 1, a to pro každý konkrétní případ zvlášť, která pokryjí sdílení rizik, odměny pro zprostředkovatele odpovědného za provádění, použití a inkasování zisků z finančních prostředků a ukončení operace.Článek 24Vyhodnocování(1) Komise pravidelně vyhodnocuje výsledky územních a tematických politik a programů a odvětvových politik a efektivitu programování, aby se přesvědčila, zda jsou plněny cíle, a mohla zformulovat doporučení pro zlepšení dalších operací.(2) Komise pošle své hodnotící zprávy pro informaci výboru uvedenému v článku 26.HLAVA VZÁVĚREČNÁ USTANOVENÍČlánek 25Výroční zprávaKomise prověří pokrok učiněný při provádění opatření přijatých podle tohoto nařízení a předloží Evropskému parlamentu a Radě výroční zprávu o provádění pomoci. Tato zpráva se předkládá rovněž Evropskému hospodářskému a sociálnímu výboru a Výboru regionů. Obsahuje informace vztahující se k předešlému roku týkající se financovaných opatření, výsledků sledování a hodnocení a informace o plnění rozpočtových závazků a plateb podle jednotlivých zemí, regionů a odvětví spolupráce.Článek 26Výbor(1) Komisi je nápomocen


text: výbor.(2) Odkazuje-li se na tento odstavec, použijí se články 4 a 7 rozhodnutí 1999/468/ES. Doba uvedená v čl. 4 odst. 3 uvedeného rozhodnutí je 30 dní.(3) Odkazuje-li se na tento odstavec, použijí se články 3 a 7 rozhodnutí 1999/468/ES.(4) Výbor přijme svůj jednací řád.Článek 27Účast třetí země, která není způsobilá podle tohoto nařízeníV zájmu zajištění koherence a efektivnosti pomoci Společenství může Komise při přijímání akčních programů druhu uvedeného v článku 12 nebo zvláštních opatření uvedených v článku 13 rozhodnout, že země, území a regiony způsobilé pro pomoc Společenství podle předvstupního nástroje nebo nástroje financování pro rozvojovou a hospodářskou spolupráci a zámořské země a území spojená se Společenstvím jsou způsobilá pro opatření podle tohoto nařízení, pokud má prováděný projekt nebo program globální, regionální nebo přeshraniční povahu.Tuto metodu financování je možno ustanovit ve strategických dokumentech uvedených v článku 7.Ustanovení článku 14 týkající se způsobilosti a ustanovení článku 16 týkající se účasti na postupech zadávání zakázek se přizpůsobí tak, aby se dotčené země, území nebo regiony mohly účastnit.Článek 28Pozastavení pomociAniž jsou dotčena ustanovení o pozastavení pomoci v dohodách o partnerství a spolupráci a v dohodách o přidružení s partnerskými zeměmi a regiony, může Rada v případě, že partnerská země nedodrží zásady uvedené v hlavě I, kvalifikovanou většinou na návrh Komise podniknout odpovídající kroky v souvislosti s jakoukoli pomocí poskytnutou partnerské zemi podle tohoto nařízení.Článek 29Finanční referenční částkaFinanční referenční částka na provádění tohoto nařízení v období let 2007–2013 činí 14 929 milionů EUR. Roční položky budou schváleny rozpočtovým orgánem v rámci limitů finančních výhledů.Článek 30PřezkoumáníKomise předloží do 31. prosince 2011 Evropskému parlamentu a Radě jakékoliv návrhy týkající se budoucnosti tohoto nařízení a případných nezbytných změn.Článek 31Zrušovací ustanovení(1) K 1. lednu 2007 se zrušují tato nařízení:- nařízení Rady (EHS) 1762/92 ze dne 29. června 1992 o provádění protokolů o finanční a technické spolupráci uzavřených mezi Společenstvím a třetími zeměmi Středomoří;- nařízení Rady (ES) 1734/94 ze dne 11. července 1994 o finanční a technické spolupráci s okupovanými územími;- nařízení Rady (ES) 1488/96 ze dne 23. července 1996 o finančních a technických doprovodných opatřeních (MEDA) k reformě hospodářských a sociálních struktur v rámci evropsko-středomořského partnerství;- nařízení Rady (ES, Euratom) č. 99/2000 ze dne 29. prosince 1999 o poskytnutí pomoci partnerským státům ve východní Evropě a střední Asii.(2) Zrušená nařízení se i nadále použijí na právní akty a závazky rozpočtových roků předcházejících roku 2007.Článek 32Vstup v platnostToto nařízení vstupuje v platnost dvacátým dnem po vyhlášení v Úředním věstníku Evropské unie .Použije se ode dne 1. ledna 2007.Toto nařízení je závazné v celém rozsahu a přímo použitelné ve všech členských státech.V Bruselu dne [...]Za Evropský parlament Za Radupředseda/předsedkyně předseda/předsedkyně[...] [...]PŘÍLOHA Partnerské země podle článku 1AlžírskoArménieÁzerbájdžánBěloruskoEgyptGruzieIzraelJordánskoLibanonLibyeMoldavskoMarokoPalestinská samospráva Západního břehu Jordánu a pásma GazyRuská federaceSýrieTuniskoUkrajinaLEGISLATIVE FINANCIAL STATEMENTPolicy area(s): EXTERNAL RELATIONS Activit(y/ies): MULTILATERAL RELATIONS AND GENERAL EXTERNAL RELATIONS MATTERS [16] EUROPEAN INITIATIVE FOR DEMOCRACY AND HUMAN RIGHTS (EIDHR) 16 RELATIONS WITH EASTERN EUROPE, THE CAUCASUS AND CENTRAL ASIAN REPUBLICS 16 RELATIONS WITH THE MIDDLE EAST AND SOUTHERN MEDITERRANEAN POLICY STRATEGY AND COORDINATION FOR POLICY AREA ‘EXTERNAL RELATIONS’16 EXTERNAL ASPECTS OF INTERNAL POLICIES


text: |TITLE OF ACTION: EUROPEAN NEIGHBOURHOOD AND PARTNERSHIP INSTRUMENT (ENPI) |1. BUDGET LINESAdministrative ExpendituresExternal Aspects of internal policies06 01 04 09 Intelligent energy – Expenditures on administrative management (partially)07 01 04 05 LIFE European Financial Instrument for the Environment — 2000 to 2006) — Operations outside Community territory — Expenditure on administrative management (partially)External Relations policy area19 01 ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENDITURE OF POLICY AREA “EXTERNAL RELATIONS”19 01 04 06 MEDA (measures to accompany the reforms of the economic and social structures in the Mediterranean non-member countries) – Expenditure on administrative management19 01 04 07 Assistance to partner countries in eastern Europe and central Asia – Expenditure on administrative management (partially)19 01 04 11 Development and consolidation of democracy and the rule of law – Respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms – Expenditure on administrative management (partially)19 01 04 12 Promotion of Community investment in developing countries of Latin America, Asia, the Mediterranean and in South Africa by economic co-operation and trade agreements – Expenditure on administrative management (partially)19 49 EXPENDITURE ON ADMINISTRATIVE MANAGEMENT OF PROGRAMMES COMMITTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FORMERFINANCIAL REGULATION19 49 04 06 Assistance to partner countries in eastern Europe and central Asia – Expenditure on administrative management (partially)19 49 04 10 Development and consolidation of democracy and the rule of law – Respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms – Expenditure on administrative management (partially)19 49 04 11 Promotion of Community investment in developing countries of Latin America, Asia, the Mediterranean and in South Africa by economic co-operation and trade agreements – Expenditure on administrativemanagement (partially)19 49 04 12 MEDA (measures to accompany the reforms of the economic and social structures in the Mediterranean non-member countries) – Expenditure on administrative managementOperational expendituresExternal Aspects of internal policies06 04 02 Intelligent energy — Europe programme (2003 to 2006): external strand — Coopener (partially)07 02 02 LIFE (European Financial Instrument for the Environment — 2000 to 2006 — Operations outside Community territory (partially)14 03 02 Customs co-operation and international assistance (Customs 2007) (partially)External Relations policy areas19 02 MULTILATERAL RELATIONS AND GENERAL EXTERNAL RELATIONS MATTERS19 02 02 Institutes specialising in relations between the European Union and third countries19 02 03 Cooperation with third countries on migration (partially)19 02 07 Promotion of Community investment in developing countries of Latin America, Asia, the Mediterranean and in South Africa by economic cooperation and trade agreements (partially)19 02 11 North-South cooperation schemes in the campaign against drugs and drug addiction (partially)19 04 EUROPEAN INITIATIVE FOR DEMOCRACY AND HUMAN RIGHTS (EIDHR)19 04 02 Support for the victims of human rights’ abuses (partially)19 04 03 Development and consolidation of democracy and the rule of law – Respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms (partially)19 04 04 Support for the activities of international criminal tribunals and the International Criminal Court (partially)19 06 RELATIONS WITH EASTERN EUROPE, THE CAUCASUS AND CENTRAL ASIAN REPUBLICS19 06 01 Assistance to partner countries in Eastern Europe and central Asia (partially)19 06 02 Cross-border cooperation in structural matters (partially)19 06 04 Rehabilitation and reconstruction operations


text: in the partner countries of Eastern Europe and central Asia (partially)19 08 RELATIONS WITH THE MIDDLE EAST AND SOUTHERN MEDITERRANEAN19 08 01 01 First and Second Financial Protocols with the southern Mediterranean countries19 08 01 02 Third and Fourth Financial Protocols with the southern Mediterranean countries19 08 02 01 MEDA (measures to accompany the reforms to the economic and social structures In the Mediterranean non-member countries)19 08 02 02 Community contribution to the Euro-Mediterranean Investment Facility and Partnership19 08 03 Community operations connected with the Israel / PLO peace agreement19 08 04 Aid to the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestinian Refugees in the Near East19 08 05 Rehabilitation and reconstruction operations in the Mediterranean and Middle Eastern countries (partially)19 08 06 Other operations in favour of Middle East developing countries (partially)2. OVERALL FIGURES2.1 Total allocation for action (Part B): € 14 929 million2.2 Period of application: 2007-20132.3 Overall multiannual estimate of expenditure: (current prices)(a) Schedule of commitment appropriations/payment appropriations (financial intervention) (see point 6.1.1)€ million ( to three decimal places)2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 and following[17] | Total |Commitments | 1.376 | 1.506 | 1.802 | 2.000 | 2.229 | 2.536 | 2.883 | 14.332 |Payments | 206 | 432 | 744 | 1.117 | 1.508 | 1.816 | 8.509 | 14.332 |(b1) Technical and administrative assistance: of which staff ( see point 6.1.2):Commitments | 33 | 37 | 45 | 51 | 59 | 68 | 78 | 371 |Payments | 33 | 37 | 45 | 51 | 59 | 68 | 78 | 371 |(b2) Technical and administrative assistance of which support expenditure (see point 6.1.2):Commitments | 24 | 26 | 30 | 32 | 34 | 38 | 42 | 226 |Payments | 24 | 26 | 30 | 32 | 34 | 38 | 42 | 226 |Subtotal a+b |Commitments | 1.433 | 1.569 | 1.877 | 2.083 | 2.322 | 2.642 | 3.003 | 14.929 |Payments | 263 | 495 | 819 | 1.200 | 1.601 | 1.922 | 8.629 | 14.929 |(c) Overall financial impact of human resources and other administrative expenditures (see points 7.2 and 7.3)€ million (to three decimal places)Commitments/Payments | 69 | 78 | 95 | 107 | 122 | 142 | 164 | 777 |TOTAL a+ b2+c |Commitments | 1.469 | 1.610 | 1.927 | 2.139 | 2.385 | 2.716 | 3.089 | 15.335 |Payments | 299 | 536 | 869 | 1.256 | 1.664 | 1.996 | 8.715 | 15.335 |2.4 Compatibility with financial programming and financial perspectiveProposal compatible with existing financial programming.2.5 Financial impact on revenueProposal has no financial implications on revenue.3. BUDGET CHRACTERISTICSType of expenditure | New | EFTA contribution | Contributions form applicant countries | Heading in financial perspective |Non-comp | Diff | YES | NO | NO | 4 |4. LEGAL BASEArticle 181a and Article 179 of the EC Treaty.5. DESCRIPTION AND GROUNDS5.1. Need for Community intervention5.1.1. Objectives pursuedThe European Council has repeatedly


text: stated its determination that enlargement of the Union must not lead to new dividing lines at the external borders of the EU of 25. The European Neighbourhood Policy was conceived as a way to respond to this challenge and develop increasingly close relations with our neighbours to the East and South. The Commission has presented a “Strategy Paper on the European Neighbourhood Policy”[18] (ENP) which spells out how the Union will continue to promote stability, security and prosperity beyond its borders by deepening political cooperation and intensifying economic relations with Russia, the Western NIS, the Southern Caucasus and the Southern Mediterranean countries. Regional and cross-border cooperation should be intensified.The ENP covers a wide range of areas: political dialogue and reform; trade; measures preparing partners for gradually obtaining a stake in the Internal Market; justice and home affairs; energy, transport, information society, environment, and research and innovation; social policy and people-to-people contacts, including the opening of certain Community programmes; and cross-border and regional co-operation.The ENP is aimed at developing the full potential of the Association Agreements and Partnership and Cooperation Agreements which for the time being continue to constitute the contractual frameworks for relations between the EU and the neighbouring countries concerned.The main operational tools of the ENP are the Action Plans drawn up jointly with partner countries. Action Plans identify priority measures for political and economic reform, and enhanced co-operation in all the relevant areas. They will be a key point of reference for the country-specific programming of Community assistance (see 5.2).The development and consolidation of democracy and the rule of law, and respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms constitute key objectives of the European Union’s external policies. Within the framework of the present Regulation and its geographical scope, the European Community will contribute to the implementation of operations advancing respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms, promoting and strengthening democratic processes, including where appropriate through election observation and assistance, and developing and consolidating the rule of law and good governance.The proposed European Neighbourhood and Partnership Instrument (ENPI) will be the main financial instrument to support the implementation of ENP and it will focus in particular on supporting the implementation of the ENP Action Plans. Its scope will go beyond promoting objectives such as sustainable development or fighting poverty to encompass for example considerable support for measures leading to progressive participation in the EU’s internal market. Legislative approximation, regulatory convergence and institution building will be supported through mechanisms such as the exchange of experience, long term twinning arrangements with Member States or participation in Community programmes and agencies.The ENPI will improve the coherence and visibility of Community assistance and allow for simplified delivery mechanisms. A specific and innovative feature of the instrument is its cross border co-operation component. Under this component, the ENPI will finance ”joint programmes” bringing together regions from Members States and partner countries sharing a common border. The instrument will bring a radical simplification in procedures and substantial gains in efficiency. It will use a “Structural


text: Funds” approach, based on multi-annual programming, partnership and co-financing. The cross border co-operation component of the ENPI will be co-financed by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF).The EU and Russia have decided to develop their relations in the framework of a Strategic Partnership based on four common spaces, rather than through the European Neighbourhood Policy. However, the issues discussed in this framework are largely similar to those dealt with in the ENP context. For this reason the ENPI will also cover Community assistance to Russia.The partner countries’ ability to meet the commitments of the Action Plans and thus move to a more advanced stage of relations with the EU will constitute the main indicator of success for the proposed approach. Periodic reporting by the Commission on progress in the implementation of the Action Plans through the institutional framework already in place (sub-committees etc.) will provide a constant feedback.5.1.2.and 5.1.3 Ex post and ex ante evaluationa) The work of the Peace GroupThe Commission carried out in the second half of 2003 an extensive high-level review of the whole range of European Community external instruments, in the context of the preparation of its proposals for the new financial perspectives. The Commission established the “Peace Group” which was tasked with leading the identification of the future priorities for external relations and the instruments needed to serve those priorities. This Group functioned at both the level of the external relations Commissioners and the services. It met regularly between April and December 2003 and developed the principles, which were set out in the Communication “Building our Common Future, Policy Challenges and Budgetary Means of the Enlarged Union 2007-2013”[19]. The need to align objectives and instruments more closely to European Union values and interests was identified as being fundamentally important.In particular, the “Peace Group” underlined that the European Union’s values, reflected by its democratic tradition, social model and integration experience, include human dignity, the rule of law, human rights, solidarity, equality between the sexes, adherence to the multilateral system of the United Nations and support, within the multilateral economic system, for regionalism as a force for development and stability. It emphasised that its interests drive the European Union to promote stable international growth founded on sustainable development. In this way it guarantees itself increasing outlets and quality jobs on competitive, open and regulated markets. Finally, the “Peace Group” recommended that the European Union promotes its values and interests by operating simultaneously as a continental power, and as a global economic and political player.As far as external community instruments are concerned, the “Peace Group” recognised that the European Union's co-operation and assistance policy is the result of 50 years of successive sedimentation, which results in a multiplication of assistance instruments and a fragmentation of aid management both in terms of programming and implementation functions (even if recent policy and structural reforms have helped to improve coherence and consistency of the European Union's co-operation and assistance policy).The “Peace Group” put forward that the European Union’s framework for external


text: assistance should be rationalised and simplified by a reduction in the number of legal bases, the number of budget lines, and the number of programmes. More precisely, it recommended that:- the complex structure of existing aid programs (EDF, ALA, MEDA, TACIS, CARDS, etc...) covering a wide range of interventions (peacekeeping and post-crisis operations; rehabilitation; economic reforms; projects; human rights programs; budgetary support) should be significantly streamlined;- European Community and Member States policies and implementation should be harmonised.Furthermore, the “Peace Group” underlined the following points:- Large geographic programmes based on the principles of ownership and partnership with partner countries and regions and thematic programmes allowing for policy initiatives by the Community should be maintained;- Strategy papers, subject to regular reviews, are the right tool to ensure overall policy coherence and to respect external policy objectives in the different areas as well as in the external aspects of internal policies;- Resources should be allocated to partner countries according to expected and measured performances and strategy papers process, backed up by stronger analytical capabilities, should confront goals and achievements;- Performance-based allocations do not mean increased conditionality in the traditional sense and the issue of political conditionality should be approached cautiously, on the basis of lessons drawn from experience;- Though this is not necessarily a solution in each and every case, such concerns for results, namely the political and economic reforms in the partner countries, leads the Commission to suggest, where possible, moving further financial and technical assistance from projects towards sector programmes, budget support and macro-economic financial assistance which facilitate both the absorption by the partner country since its own budgetary procedures are used, and donors’ co-ordination as well as quick disbursement subject to compliance though.The current proposal also takes account of the vast literature of work on development, the practice of other international and bi-lateral donors, as well as of the principles and objectives of the reform of the management of external assistance launched by the Commission in May 2000.b) Evaluation of existing instruments operating in neighbouring counries -introductionThe ENPI is a policy-driven instrument that will bring more coherence in the delivery of Community assistance to all countries covered by the ENP. It will replace TACIS, MEDA and a number of thematic programmes. It will also replace the cross-border cooperation programmes financed by TACIS and MEDA as well as by Interreg.All these instruments have been in operation for some time, during which considerable evaluation work has been carried out.Regarding MEDA II, this continuous evaluation and refinement process will culminate in a major overall evaluation to be reviewed by the Council in 2006. Its outcome will provide a major input to an ex ante evaluation for its successor instrument.As far as TACIS is concerned, a proposal for a revision of the regulation currently in force has been elaborated for the period 2005-2006. This proposal is also based on a specific ex ante evaluation.Cross border co-operation has been subject to considerable interim and ex post evaluation work outlining the difficulties that different budget lines


text: and different programming and implementing structures have created to the financing of truly joint projects operating on both sides of the Union’s external borders.A summary of the findings of this evaluation work is given below. Lessons learnt in this context have been used in the elaboration of the ENPI concept.b) TACISA detailed ex ante evaluation has been carried out for a revised TACIS regulation for the period 2005-2006. It included detailed stakeholder consultation and ex post evaluation of lessons learnt.The evaluation revealed that overall, the appropriateness of the TACIS approach has faded over time. At the time of initial design in the early 1990s, TACIS correctly identified the need to support to democratic and economic transition. More recently, partner countries display widely varying results in terms of growth, poverty reduction, democracy and credible reforms. In the face of this increased divergence, the focus on technical assistance is seen as far less appropriate.While having achieved notable results, TACIS has consistently had difficulties in ensuring sufficient ownership by partner countries. It only had a moderate effect on overall reforms. The procedures have been criticised as heavy and slow, thereby putting obstacles in the way of responsiveness and flexibility, essential elements for technical assistance.The evaluation has produced a list of recommendations including, inter alia: tailor assistance programmes better to country needs through greater differentiation; improve ability to support poverty reduction, pay more attention to capacity-building and the rule of law; conditionality should be linked to ongoing reform efforts; improve funding and coordination with Interreg and Phare CBC; improve the efficiency of the institutional set-up for implementation; and the strengthen ability to learn from experience and to disseminate lessons.c) MEDAThe MEDA regulation currently in force provides for an evaluation to be done by 31 December 2005. This evaluation will provide further elements to improve programming and delivery of assistance under the ENPI.Meanwhile, there is an ongoing programme of evaluations, whose recommendations prepare the ground for the ex ante evaluation. Most recently an evaluation was conducted in 2003/04 covering economic cooperation with seven MED partners: Algeria, Egypt, Jordan, Lebanon, Morocco, Syria and Tunisia. The main recommendations were:- At strategic level : Continue and improve the practice of designing (and regularly updating) an explicit strategy at country level. Assist partner countries in identifying their strengths and weaknesses with respect to social and economic development, and in designing their own strategies and programmes to prepare the establishment of the Euro-Mediterranean Free-Trade-Area.- At programming level : Link Structural Adjustment Facilities and technical assistance projects. Develop complementarities with regional programmes and with EIB lending activities. Adopt a comprehensive approach to the financing of SMEs. The newly created Facility for Euro-Mediterranean Investment and Partnership (FEMIP) is a very important step in this direction. Devote more attention to the enhancement of trade and external economic relations.- At implementation level : Generally speaking the process of “deconcentration” should favour more efficient management of the projects. Project preparation and monitoring should be strengthened. Where conditions are met, full responsibility for the management should


text: be given to local authorities. Support to the development of local consultancy capacities should be considered.d) Cross-border cooperation (CBC)The CBC component of the ENPI builds on the experience of promoting cross-border cooperation within the Phare, Tacis and Interreg programmes. Starting with the Communication on the “New Neighbourhood Instrument”, the reflection leading to the present proposal drew heavily upon the lessons learnt from these current programmes. Therefore, although a formal ex ante evaluation has not been made yet, all the points that should be covered by such an evaluation as specified in the Financial Regulation and its Implementing Rules have been addressed at the reflection stage. Meetings were held with evaluators and experts, and input received from NGOs.Interreg II (1994 – 99) was recently subjected to an ex-post evaluation commissioned by DG Regio (December 2003). The results are in general satisfactory with an extensive added value generated by the programmes of all its strands. Among the shortcomings identified were Member States ́ programme management and difficulties in establishing functioning cross-border partnerships. These issues deserve of course special attention when it comes to implementing a new instrument like the ENPI and fostering a “cooperation culture” in border regions where the new Member States have limited experience of CBC and the Partner Countries no previous direct experience at all.CBC programmes have also been subject to audits in the past by the Court of Auditors. The CoA remarked the absence of strong co-ordination mechanisms for CBC projects which involved funding under different instruments such as Interreg, Phare and Tacis. This problem has also been identified in the Commission’s evaluations and addressing it is one of the primary objectives of the ENPI. As regards Phare CBC, the existence of different Phare and Structural Funds rules for project selection, tendering, contracting and monitoring proved to be a deterrent to joint projects across the borders. The ENPI, as a unified instrument stressing joint ownership, should overcome the obstacles to joint programmes and projects.Other observations relevant for the ENPI included that the allocation of funds between countries did not adequately take into account their absorption capacities. The distribution of funds between larger and smaller projects and their cross-border impact was also questioned. Another observation concerned delays in the implementation of projects due to lengthy procurement procedures and problems with customs clearance in the beneficiary countries.The observations and recommendations resulting from the various evaluation work referred to above have been taken into account for the drafting of the ENPI regulation here proposed.e) Conclusions - Added value of Community interventionEffective support is needed to underpin a policy of contributing to a peaceful, stable, democratic and prosperous neighbourhood. This new policy driven instrument is specifically designed for that purpose.There is also a gap to be bridged between the level of ambition of the policy and the resources currently allocated to it by the Community and its Member States. Community assistance remains below the expectation of the beneficiaries and most bilateral assistance programmes are small.Regarding CBC, the ENPI added value will first


text: and foremost consist in addressing specific problems associated with national borders or issues of a transnational nature, which otherwise would not be addressed. The ENPI will have a financial leverage effect for the EU neighbouring countries/regions by matching national co-financing with EU funds. Finally the implementation of the ENPI will allow for the dissemination of sound financial management and good practice in terms of programming and project design, management, implementation, financial control, monitoring and evaluation.5.2. Action envisaged and budget intervention arrangementsThe Partnership and Co-operation agreements and the Association agreements will provide an overall policy framework for Community assistance. Where they exist, jointly agreed action plans drawn up by the EU and each partner country will define priorities for action in the areas described above.Within that framework it is expected that the instrument will promote enhanced co-operation and progressive economic integration between the EU and the partner countries. In that context promoting legislative and regulatory approximation to encourage progressive participation in the internal market and the intensification of trade is a key strategic objective of the instrument.While the ENP provides a clear policy focus for the instrument, the provision of assistance shall take into account, for those partner countries that are developing countries, the principles and objectives of the Community development policy.Individual actions and measures, specific objectives and corresponding criteria to measure their attainment will be defined in Country Strategy Papers and National Indicative Programmes. These will be elaborated on the basis of the Action Plans and in-depth analyses of a given country’s situation and needs, its capacities and track-record in implementing commitments made, and also the level of ambition in our bilateral relations, such as the actual commitment to shared values.It is expected that the mix between the various objectives will vary considerably taking into account the specific situation of each of the 17 the countries concerned. While assistance to Ukraine or co-operation with Russia and Israel can focus mainly on legislative and regulatory approximation, assistance to Moldova, Azerbaijan or Egypt should continue to have a significant component focussing on poverty reduction and more traditional development objectives. Similarly the geographical, economic, social and cultural specificities of the two main “regional” groups covered by the instrument (Medierranean Countries on one side and Russia, WNIS and Southern Caucasus on the other) should be adequately reflected in the objectives to be pursued and the measures to be financed.The ENPI will have a specific component covering Cross border co-operation between Member Sates and partner countries. This component will be mainly geared towards promoting sustainable economic, social and environmental development in border regions of the EU and the member states. This component will be implemented through multi-annual programmes elaborated in partnership by the beneficiaries from both sides of the borders and approved by the Commission. In addition it will be possible to associate Member States to multi-country or thematic programmes through trans-regional co-operation addressing global challenges common to the EU and its neighbours.The ENPI will also cover external aspects of internal policies which, in the


text: current financial perspective are covered under specific legal instruments. This will provide the possibility for mainstreaming thematic actions into country and regional programmes allowing for better co-ordination and synergy. The regulation also provides the possibility of creating thematic programmes when it is considered appropriate for reasons of efficiency, effectiveness or visibility. This is an option that may be pursued in areas such as Human Rights, migration management, environment or students mobility and co-operation among higher education institutions.Concerning the field of promoting democratisation and the rule of law, and respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms a thematic programme receiving Community support in pursuit of the present Regulation’s objectives may include- pertinent global, regional and country projects and programmes of local and EU non-governmental and civil society based organisations,- cooperation with international organisations in the field of democratisation and human rights.In the area of migration management, a thematic programme, operating in complementarity with measures supported under country and regional programmes may focus on:- the development of third country’s legislation in the field of legal immigration;- the devlopment of legal migration;- the development of legislation and national practices as regards international protection;- the establishment in the third countries concerned of an effective and preventive policy in the fight against illegal migration, including the fight against trafficking in human being and smuggling of migrants, and the development of relevant legislation;Relevant indicators will have to be developed for each measure. The extensive experience already made will be useful, as reflected for instance in the Working Paper on Indicators for Interreg developed by DG REGIO. They will cover aspects such as co-financing, multiplication effect, transfer of knowledge, capacity building.Target population: The ENPI targets over 400 million people in 17 countries. Russia and the Western NIS (Belarus, Ukraine, Moldova) have a total population of 208 million people, the countries of Southern Caucasus ( (Georgia, Armenia, Azerbaijan) 16 million people and the countries of the southern Mediterranean ( Syria, Lebanon, Israel, the Palestinian Authority, Jordan, Egypt, Algeria, Tunisia, Libya, and Morocco) 176 milllion.It is estimated that around 65 million people in member states and partner countries will benefit from bilateral cross border co-operation programme and over 175 million people will be involved into multi-lateral maritime programmes.The large number of co-operation objectives, related to the need to support a new and ambitious policy and the broadening of the scope of the instrument to support thematic actions and cross border co-operation with member states justify the considerable increase in resources which is foreseen for the ENPI in the future financial perspective.5.3. Methods of implementationProgrammes may be implemented under direct centralised management by the Commission from Headquarters and/or thought the devolved Delegations using both statutory and temporary staff. They may also be implemented under decentralised management by the beneficiary country and under joint management with international organisations. The Regulation also leaves open the possibility for programme implementation under indirect centralised management arrangements by national public sector bodies or bodies governed by private law with a public service mission or by


text: an executive agency for programme implementation.Cross-border co-operation programmes will be normally implemented through shared management by a managing authority located in Member States.6. FINANCIAL IMPACT6.1 Total financial impact on Part B – (over the entire programme) (current prices)6.1.1 Financial interventionCommitments € million (to three decimal places)Number of permanent posts | Number of temporary posts |Officials or temporary staff | HQ: 192 Del: 141 | 333 |Other human resources | HQ: END: AUX: INT: Ex BA-lines : ATA: Delegations: Ex: BA-lines ALAT/AL: Ind.Expert: | 3 9 2 87 338 84 |Total | 856 |7.2. Overall financial impact of human resources (2004 prices)Type of human resources | Amount (€) | Method of calculation * |Officials+Temporary staff HQ Delegation | 20 736 000 27 376 278 | 192x 108 000€ 141x 194.158€ |HQ: END AUX INT Ex BA-lines ATA Delegations: Ex BA-lines: ALAT/AL Individ. Experts: | 133 632 510 840 126 192 5 015 202 25 853 620 15 540 000 | 3x 44 544€ 9x 56 760€ 2x 63 096€ 87 x57 646€ 338x 76 490€ 84x 185 000€ |Total | 95 291 764 |7.3. Other administrative expenditure deriving from the action (2004 prices)Budget line (number and heading) | Amount € | Method of calculation |Overall allocation (Title A7) A0701 – Missions A07030 – Meetings A07031 – Compulsory committees 1 A07032 – Non-compulsory committees 1 A07040 – Conferences A0705 – Studies and consultations Other expenditure (specify) | 933.800 100.000 500.000 0 300.000 200.000 0 | 667 missions x 1.400 euro per mission 100 meetings x 1.000 euro per meeting 2x /month x 10 months = 20 meetings per year x 25.000 euro per meeting |Information systems (A-5001/A-4300) | 200.000 |Other expenditure - Part A (specify) | 0 |Total | 2.233.800 |The amounts are total expenditure for twelve months.1 Specify the type of committee and the group to which it belongs.(2004 prices)I. Annual total (7.2 + 7.3) II. Duration of action III. Total cost of action (I x II) | € 97 525 564 7 years € 682 678 948 |- The needs in human and administrative resources are covered within the budget allocated to the managing DG in the framework of the annual allocation procedure.- The allocation of posts will depend on the internal organisation of the next Commission and on a possible reallocation of posts between the services following the new financial perspectives.8. FOLLOW UP AND EVALUATION8.1. Follow up arrangementsThe Commission will monitor progress of its external co-operation on all levels, input (in particular financial flows (commitments, contracts and payments), activities / outputs (project and programme execution, internal monitoring carried out on the spot by Commission Delegations), progress / outcome (external Results-Oriented Monitoring - ROM[20]) and impact (Millennium Development Goals are jointly monitored with partners).All countries and regional pluriannual indicative program will include the specific objectives and expected results for each area of co-operation, and a limited number of key outcome indicators in regard to economic and poverty situation. These indicators must relate to developments that are measurable in the short/medium


text: term. If there is a Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper process under way, the indicators must correspond to those developed in that framework.The programming of long-term external aid for partner countries and regions is carried out in the framework of the preparation of country and regional strategy papers (up to 7-years). These country strategies also include a work plan or national / regional indicative programme jointly agreed between the Community and partner country/region concerned.Under the principle of rolling programming, a review process is foreseen including annual operational reviews, mid-term reviews, and ad-hoc reviews where necessary. These review mechanism provides the flexibility required to ensure that operations are kept constantly in line with changes occurring in the economic situation, priorities and objectives of the partner country/region.Reviews take a special interest on progress achieved in terms of financial execution of aid, as well as in terms of results achieved and evolution of the context in term of poverty reduction, economic performance and supported sectors. Updated intervention frameworks and indicator tables on focal sectors are annexed to review documents in order to facilitate the assessment at the time of the review. In particular, mid-term reviews may lead to a change of strategy, as well as a change in the country/region allocation in the light of the current needs and performance.The thematic strategy papers will include a list of indicators that will allow, on the basis of available information, to monitor the global situation in relation to the specific theme.The annual Action Programmes will include information on the type of performance indicators that will have to be monitored when implementing the measures financed by the Commission.Cross Border Co-operation programmes to be prepared by the partners for adoption by the Commission will devote particular attention to the definition of indicators at the level of the priorities and measures and the elaboration of the necessary institutional arrangements for monitoring.8.2 Arrangements and schedule for the planned evaluationIn application of current rules and in view of the vast scope of the activities foreseen, an evaluation system covering the different levels of intervention and types of instruments has been set up.Notably, the financial regulation, as well as the internal control standards, calls for regular evaluation of all (sizable) activities. This is translated into the evaluation of single operations (e.g. development projects), of programmes (e.g. country strategies) and policy sectors or themes (e.g. transport or gender issues). Evaluations of are also necessary and ongoing of wider legal obligations such as the 3 Cs (Coherence, Complementarity, Coordination).In practical terms, above mentioned obligations would amount to a yearly evaluation programme covering roughly the following: 30 country strategy evaluations (approximately 120 sizeable Country Strategy Papers covered over a 4 year cycle) , 4 evaluations of regional and sub regional strategies; 4 evaluations of themes and sectors and 4 joint evaluations. It is also estimated that about 300 projects and other operations have to be evaluated each year.[21]These works will be complemented by relevant works on databases, meta-analyses, methodology and training.9. ANTI-FRAUD MEASURESThe protection of


text: the Community’s financial interests and the fight against fraud and irregularities form an integral part of this Regulation.Administrative monitoring of contracts and payments will be the responsibility of the EC Delegations in beneficiary countries.Each of the operations financed under this regulation will be supervised at all stages in the project cycle through the delegations. Supervision will take account of contractual obligations as well as of the principles of cost/benefit analysis and sound financial management.For Cross Border co-operation programmes operating under shared management the Member State where the joint managing authority is located is responsible for ensuring sound financial management and the legality and regularity of the transactions.Moreover, any agreement or contract concluded pursuant to this Regulation shall expressly provide for monitoring of spending authorised under the projects/programmes and the proper implementation of activities as well as financial control by the Commission, including the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF), and audits by the Court of Auditors, if necessary on the spot. They shall authorise the Commission (OLAF) to carry out on-the-spot checks and inspections in accordance with Council Regulation (Euratom, EC) No 2185/96 of 11 November 1996 concerning on-the-spot checks and inspections carried out by the Commission in order to protect the European Communities’ financial interests against fraud and irregularities.Particular attention will be paid to the nature of expenditure (eligibility of expenditure), to respect for budgets (actual expenditure) and to verify supporting information and relevant documentation (evidence of expenditure).[1] KOM(2004) 101 ze dne 10. února 2004 a KOM(2004) 487 ze dne 14. července 2004[2] Strategický dokument o politice evropského sousedství, KOM(2004) 373 ze dne 12. května 2004.[3] Rada ve složení pro obecné záležitosti ze dne 14. června 2004.[4] Jedná se o: společný hospodářský prostor (včetně zvláštního odkazu na životní prostředí a energii), společný prostor svobody, bezpečnosti a spravedlnosti, prostor spolupráce v oblasti vnější bezpečnosti a dále prostor výzkumu a vzdělání včetně kulturních aspektů.[5] Jako v nařízeních MEDA a Tacis.[6] KOM(2004) 313 ze dne 26. dubna 2004.[7] Úř. věst. C [...], s. [...].[8] Úř. věst. C [...], s. [...].[9] Úř. věst. C [...], s. [...].[10] Úř. věst. L 184, 17.7.1999, s. 23.[11] Úř. věst. L 181, 1.7.1992, s. 1.[12] Úř. věst. L 189, 30.7.1996, s. 1. Nařízení naposledy pozměněné nařízením (ES) č. 2698/2000 (Úř. věst. L 311, 12.12.2000, s. 1).[13] Úř. věst. L 12, 18.1.2000, s. 1.[14] Úř. věst. L 182, 16.7.1994, s. 1. Nařízení naposledy pozměněné nařízením (ES) č. 669/2004 (Úř. věst. L 105, 14.4.2004, s. 1).[15] Úř. věst. L 248, 16.9.2002, s. 1.[16] Partially, as some of the actions currently covered under this budget heading will be covered under the Economic Co-operation and Development Instrument and/or the Stability instrument.[17] “Following years” only applies to payments[18] European Neighbourhood Policy Strategy Paper COM(2004) 373 [and separate explanatory note?].[19] COM(2004) 101 du 10 février 2004.[20] The results-oriented monitoring system (ROM) allows a rapid appreciation of a project or programme’s performance, as well as of its wider implications and provides the Commission with independent advice on its project portfolio. The system was initially developed and


text: tested in 2000/2001 before expansion during 2002 to all regions of the Commission’s external co-operation. Having one consistent approach ensures that the Commission has comparable data for all regions where it provides external assistance.[21] The evaluation programme mentioned in this paragraph covers all co-operation activities covered by the four external aid instruments: « instrument for pre-accession », « european neighbourhood and partnership instrument », stability instrument » and « economic co-operation and development instrument ». Human and financial resources necessary for the implementation of the programme are estimated at 72 man/year and 24,6 M€ per year.


text:
 Důležité právní upozornění
 |
 52006SC0115
 Předloha rozhodnutí č. 1/2006 Smíšeného výboru ES a Svýcarska kterým se nahrazuje tabulka III a IV b) protokolu č. 2 - Předloha společného postoje Společenství /* SEK/2006/0115 konecném znení */
 [pic] | KOMISE EVROPSKÝCH SPOLEČENSTVÍ |V Bruselu dne 31.01.2006SEK(2006) 115 v konecném zneníPředlohaROZHODNUTÍ č. 1/2006 SMÍŠENÉHO VÝBORU ES A ŠVÝCARSKAkterým se nahrazuje tabulka III a IV b) protokolu č. 2- Předloha společného postoje Společenství - (předložená Komisí)PředlohaROZHODNUTÍ č. 1/2006 SMÍŠENÉHO VÝBORU ES A ŠVÝCARSKAkterým se nahrazuje tabulka III a IV b) protokolu č. 2SMÍŠENÝ VÝBOR,s ohledem na dohodu mezi Evropským hospodářským společenstvím na straně jedné a Švýcarskou konfederací na straně druhé podepsanou v Bruselu dne 22. července 1972, dále jen „dohoda“, ve znění dohody mezi Evropským společenstvím a Švýcarskou konfederací, kterou se mění dohoda, pokud jde o ustanovení použitelná pro zpracované zemědělské produkty, podepsané v Lucemburku dne 26. října 2004, a její protokol č. 2, a zejména na článek 7 uvedeného protokolu,vzhledem k tomu, že za účelem provádění protokolu č. 2 dohody jsou interní referenční ceny pro smluvní strany stanoveny smíšeným výborem,vzhledem k tomu, že se na domácích trzích smluvních stran změnily skutečné ceny surovin, na něž se použijí opatření pro vyrovnání cen,vzhledem k tomu, že je proto nezbytné odpovídajícím způsobem aktualizovat referenční ceny a částky uvedené v tabulkách III a IV b) protokolu č. 2,ROZHODLA TAKTO:Článek 1Tabulka III a tabulka IV b) protokolu č. 2 se nahrazují tabulkami v příloze I a II tohoto rozhodnutí.Článek 2Toto rozhodnutí vstupuje v platnost dnem 1. února 2006.V Bruselu dne [...].Za smíšený výborpředsedaPŘÍLOHA ITabulka IIIDomácí referenční ceny ES a švýcarské domácí referenční cenyZemědělská | Švýcarská domácí | Domácí | Rozdíl referenční ceny |surovina | referenční cena | referenční cena ES | Švýcarsko/ES |CHF na | CHF na | CHF na |100 kg čisté váhy | 100 kg čisté váhy | 100 kg čisté váhy |Pšenice obecná | 55,36 | 17,88 | 37,48 |Pšenice tvrdá | 35,39 | 26,51 | 8,88 |Žito | 48,45 | 17,82 | 30,63 |Ječmen | 26,48 | 20,33 | 6,15 |Kukuřice | 29,42 | 20,67 | 8,75 |Mouka z pšenice obecné | 99,96 | 37,36 | 62,60 |Plnotučné sušené mléko | 583,10 | 370,70 | 212,40 |Odstředěné sušené mléko | 456,50 | 315,29 | 141,21 |Máslo | 897,00 | 433,29 | 463,71 |Bílý cukr | – | – | 0,00 |Vejce (1) | 255,00 | 205,50 | 49,50 |Čerstvé brambory | 42,00 | 21,00 | 21,00 |Rostlinný tuk (2) | 390,00 | 160,00 | 230,00 |(1) Odvozené z cen tekutých ptačích vajec, ne ve skořápce, násobené činitelem 0,85.(2) Ceny rostlinných tuků (na pečení a pro potravinářský průmysl) se 100% obsahem tuku.PŘÍLOHA IITabulka IVb) Základní částky zemědělských surovin zohledněné při výpočtech zemědělských složek:Zemědělská surovina | Použitá základní částka po vstupu v platnost | Použitá základní částka tři roky po vstupu v platnost |CHF na 100 kg čisté váhy | CHF na 100 kg čisté váhy |Pšenice obecná | 34,00 | 32,00 |Pšenice tvrdá | 8,00 | 8,00 |Žito | 28,00 | 26,00 |Ječmen |


text: 6,00 | 5,00 |Kukuřice | 8,00 | 7,00 |Mouka z pšenice obecné | 54,00 | 51,00 |Plnotučné sušené mléko | 191,00 | 181,00 |Odstředěné sušené mléko | 127,00 | 120,00 |Máslo | 464,00 (1) | 464,00 (1) |Bílý cukr | Nula | Nula |Vejce | 36,00 | 36,00 |Čerstvé brambory | 19,00 | 18,00 |Rostlinný tuk | 207,00 | 196,00 |(1) S přihlédnutím k výhodám plynoucím z podpory na máslo poskytované podle nařízení Komise (ES) č. 2571/97 ze dne 15. prosince 1997 ve znění pozdějších předpisů není použitá základní částka za máslo snížena ve srovnání s cenovým rozdílem v tabulce III.FINANCIAL DETAILS | ENTR |1. The financial details have not yet been communicated. Draft decision replacing Tables III and IV b) of Protocol 2 to be adopted as Community position to be taken in EC – Switzerland Joint Committee. | The financial details have already been communicated, this being : The implementation of a Council Regulation, see financial statement annexed to Written Procedure No ....... |2. Does the measure as such entail financial consequences? concerns the technical implementing arrangements (1) negligible ............. Financial consequences of the measure as such (on revenue/expenditure) : * for current financial year: -....mio € * for next financial year:-....mio € |3. Budget headings concerned and appropriations for current financial year - item(s) : all tariff lines mentioned in Table I of Protocol 2 - appropriations: since 1 February 2005 there are no export refunds applicable on exports to Switzerland. |Financing of measure: a) Possible using appropriations entered in current budget? -under item(s) concerned -under chapter(s) concerned b) If no, is there a risk because of this measure: of insufficient total EAGGF-Guarantee appropriations entered for the current financial year? c) Is it planned/envisaged in the preliminary draft budget for the following year? |Comments: (1) It concerns a yearly update of measures applicable on the Swiss side based on reduced price differences. |XYESNOX


text:
 |
 52012PC0512
 Návrh NAŘÍZENÍ EVROPSKÉHO PARLAMENTU A RADY, kterým se mění nařízení (EU) č. 1093/2010 o zřízení Evropského orgánu dohledu (Evropského orgánu pro bankovnictví), pokud jde o jeho vztah k nařízení Rady (EU) č. .../..., kterým se Evropské centrální bance svěřují zvláštní úkoly týkající se politik, které se vztahují k obezřetnostnímu dohledu nad úvěrovými institucemi /* COM/2012/0512 final - 2012/0244 (COD) */
 DŮVODOVÁ ZPRÁVA
 1. SOUVISLOSTI NÁVRHU
 V současné době je spolehlivost
 bankovního sektoru stále v mnoha ohledech úzce spjata s členským
 státem, v němž jsou banky usazeny. Pochybnosti o udržitelnosti
 veřejného dluhu, vyhlídkách na ekonomický růst a životaschopnosti
 úvěrových institucí vytvářejí negativní, vzájemně se posilující
 tržní trendy. To může být rizikové pro životaschopnost některých
 úvěrových institucí, jakož i pro stabilitu finančního systému a
 může to znamenat výraznou zátěž pro již tak napjaté veřejné
 finance dotčených členských států.
 Tato situace vytváří konkrétní rizika v
 eurozóně, kde jednotná měna zvyšuje pravděpodobnost toho, že
 vývoj v jednom členském státě může ohrozit hospodářský
 vývoj a stabilitu v celé eurozóně. Stávající riziko finančního
 rozštěpení postupující podél státních hranic navíc výrazně narušuje
 jednotný trh v oblasti finančních služeb a brání tomu, aby napomohl
 k hospodářskému oživení.
 Zřízení Evropského orgánu pro
 bankovnictví (dále „orgán pro bankovnictví“ nebo „EBA“) nařízením
 Evropského parlamentu a Rady (EU) č. 1093/2010 ze dne 24. listopadu 2010 o
 zřízení Evropského orgánu dohledu (Evropského orgánu pro bankovnictví) a
 Evropského systému dohledu nad finančním trhem (ESFS) již
 přispělo k lepší spolupráci mezi vnitrostátními orgány dohledu a
 k vypracování jednotného souboru pravidel pro finanční služby v EU. Dohled nad bankami však do značné míry nadále
 přísluší členským státům, a proto se nedokáže vypořádat
 s propojenými bankovními trhy. Od nástupu bankovní krize selhání dohledu
 významně narušilo důvěru v bankovní sektor EU a zhoršilo
 napětí na trzích se státními dluhopisy v eurozóně.
 Z tohoto důvodu v květnu 2012 vyzvala
 Komise v rámci dlouhodobější vize pro ekonomickou a fiskální integraci k vytvoření
 bankovní unie, aby se obnovila důvěra v banky a v euro.
 Jedním z klíčových prvků bankovní unie by měl být jednotný mechanismus
 dohledu s přímou kontrolou nad bankami, který by přísně a
 nestranně prosazoval obezřetnostní pravidla a účinně
 dohlížel na přeshraniční trhy s bankovními službami. Bude-li se
 bankovní dohled v eurozóně držet vysokých společných
 standardů, přispěje obnovení nezbytné důvěry mezi
 členskými státy, což je nezbytnou podmínkou pro zavedení jakéhokoli
 společného jištění.
 Na summitu eurozóny dne 29. června 2012
 vyzvaly hlavy států a předsedové vlád Komisi, aby „v brzké
 době předložila návrhy, které by zavedly jednotný mechanismus dohledu. Pokud bude takový mechanismus pro banky
 v eurozóně vytvořen, Evropský mechanismus stability by mohl mít na
 základě řádného rozhodnutí možnost přímo rekapitalizovat banky“. V závěrech zasedání Evropské rady konaného ve dnech
 28.–29. června 2012 se uvádí, že toto prohlášení týkající se eurozóny a
 návrhy, které v souladu s ním Komise předloží, by měly
 zohlednit vývoj „konkrétního a časově vymezeného plánu
 k dosažení skutečné hospodářské a měnové unie“.
 V rámci tohoto nového mechanismu bude
 Evropská centrální banka provádět širokou škálu klíčových úkolů
 v oblasti dohledu nad úvěrovými institucemi v


text:
členských
 státech eurozóny. V zájmu zachování a
 prohloubení vnitřního trhu budou ostatní členské státy moci navázat
 s Evropskou centrální bankou úzkou spolupráci.
 Aby po zavedení jednotného mechanismu dohledu
 nedošlo k roztříštění vnitřního trhu, je nezbytné zajistit
 řádné fungování orgánu pro bankovnictví. Jeho
 úloha by proto měla zůstat zachována, aby mohl dále pracovat na
 jednotném souboru pravidel a zajišťovat sbližování postupů dohledu
 v celé EU.
 Společně s návrhem
 nařízení Rady, kterým se podle čl. 127
 odst. 6 SFEU svěřují Evropské
 centrální bance zvláštní úkoly týkající se politik, které
 se vztahují k obezřetnostnímu dohledu nad úvěrovými institucemi, zavádí
 tento návrh cílené změny nařízení, kterým se zřizuje Evropský
 orgán pro bankovnictví.
 2. VÝSLEDKY KONZULTACÍ SE
 ZÚČASTNĚNÝMI STRANAMI A POSOUZENÍ DOPADŮ
 Komise zohlednila analýzu provedenou v
 souvislosti s přijetím tzv. dohledového balíčku, kterým byly
 vytvořeny evropské orgány dohledu, jež posoudila operační, správní,
 finanční a právní aspekty vztahující se k zavedení jednotného mechanismu
 dohledu. V krátkém termínu, který byl na summitu eurozóny z 29.
 června stanoven, nebylo možné formální posouzení dopadů vypracovat.
 3. PRÁVNÍ STRÁNKA NÁVRHU
 Návrh vychází z článku 114 SFEU,
 neboť mění nařízení (EU) č. 1093/2010, které bylo přijato
 na stejném právním základě.
 Návrh se omezuje na úpravu procedurálních
 postupů, kterými se orgán pro bankovnictví řídí, s cílem zohlednit
 svěření úkolů v oblasti dohledu Evropské centrální bance a zajistit,
 aby orgán pro bankovnictví mohl nadále vykonávat své funkce s cílem
 chránit celistvost, efektivnost a řádné fungování vnitřního trhu
 v oblasti finančních služeb a udržovat stabilitu finančního
 systému na vnitřním trhu. Návrh nemění rozložení příslušných
 pravomocí mezi orgánem pro bankovnictví a orgány členských států.
 Ustanovení tohoto návrhu nepřekračují rámec toho, co je nezbytně
 nutné pro dosažení sledovaných cílů. Návrh je proto v souladu se
 zásadami subsidiarity a proporcionality stanovenými v článku 5
 Smlouvy o Evropské unii.
 4. Podrobné vysvětlení návrhu
 Pravomoci orgánu pro bankovnictví, zejména
 pokud jde o závazná rozhodnutí přijímaná k urovnávání sporů a v
 mimořádných situacích
 Znění článku 4, čl. 18 odst. 1
 a čl. 35 odst. 1 až 3 se mění tak, aby mohl orgán pro bankovnictví
 vykonávat své úkoly také ve vztahu k Evropské centrální bance. Novelizací
 se tedy vyjasňuje, že pojem „příslušné orgány“ zahrnuje také
 Evropskou centrální banku, jak je tomu i v ostatních článcích, které
 na „příslušné orgány“ odkazují.
 Aby mohl orgán pro bankovnictví vykonávat své
 úkoly v oblasti urovnávání sporů a opatření
 v mimořádných situacích také ve vztahu k Evropské centrální
 bance, vkládají se v článcích 18 a 19 odstavce 3a, které stanoví
 zvláštní postup ve vztahu k rozhodnutím, které orgán pro bankovnictví
 přijímá podle odstavců 3 obou uvedených článků.
 V rámci tohoto postupu platí, že pokud Evropská centrální banka nevyhoví
 opatření orgánu pro bankovnictví, které má za cíl urovnání sporů nebo
 řešení mimořádné situace, měla by podat vysvětlení.
 V takovém případě (který je nepravděpodobný), kdy jsou
 příslušné požadavky stanoveny v přímo použitelných právních
 předpisech EU, může orgán pro bankovnictví přijmout individuální
 rozhodnutí určené dotčené finanční instituci, aby prosadil své
 opatření, a běžně se očekává, že tak učiní. Díky tomu
 budou opatření orgánu pro bankovnictví, která mají


text:
za cíl urovnání
 sporů nebo řešení mimořádné situace, plně vymahatelná.
 Způsob hlasování
 Jelikož bude Evropská centrální banka
 koordinovat postoj členských států eurozóny, je nutné změnit
 způsob hlasování, který je nyní stanoven v nařízení o EBA, aby
 rozhodnutí orgánu pro bankovnictví byla přijímána v zájmu zachování a
 posilování vnitřního trhu v oblasti finančních služeb.
 Podle nařízení o EBA přijímá
 rozhodnutí o otázkách regulačních (závazné technické normy, obecné pokyny
 a doporučení podle článků 10, 15 a 16 a rozhodnutí o
 přehodnocení omezení pro finanční činnosti podle čl. 9
 odst. 5) i rozpočtových (kapitola VI) rada orgánů dohledu kvalifikovanou
 většinou svých členů v souladu s čl. 16 odst. 4 Smlouvy o
 Evropské unii a článkem 3 Protokolu (č. 36) o přechodných
 ustanoveních.
 Rozhodnutí o dalších otázkách (např. o
 porušení práva podle článku 17, o urovnávání sporů podle článku
 19 nebo o volbě správní rady) přijímá rada orgánů dohledu
 prostou většinou členů s hlasovacím právem, kdy každý člen
 má jeden hlas.
 Pokud nebudou hlasovací práva
 změněna, nelze zajistit, aby rozhodnutí přijímaná prostou
 většinou vždy představovala zájmy Unie jako celku. Způsob
 hlasování v některých specifických případech prosté většiny
 je proto nutné upravit, aby zůstala zachována celistvost vnitřního
 trhu a zároveň nebyl ochromen rozhodovací proces v orgánu pro
 bankovnictví.
 Nejlepším způsobem, jak tohoto cíle
 dosáhnout, je svěřit rozhodovací pravomoci nezávislé odborné
 skupině a zavést účinný mechanismus hlasování na základě
 obráceného většinového principu, který zajistí, aby návrh vypracovaný
 nezávislou odbornou skupinou podpořily členské státy eurozóny i mimo
 eurozónu. Díky tomu také členské státy eurozóny nebudou disponovat
 blokační menšinou v případě opatření proti jednomu
 z nich.
 Článek 41 nařízení o orgánu pro
 bankovnictví se proto mění tak, aby měla nezávislá odborná skupina
 v otázkách porušení práva EU a urovnávání sporů silnější
 rozhodovací pravomoci, a odpovídajícím způsobem upravuje pravidla, kterými
 se řídí její složení.
 Článek 44 nařízení o orgánu pro
 bankovnictví nově stanoví, že rozhodnutí navržená nezávislou odbornou
 skupinou jsou přijata, nejsou-li zamítnuta prostou většinou, která
 zahrnuje alespoň tři hlasy zúčastněných členských
 států a tři hlasy nezúčastněných členských států.
 Je přidáno zvláštní ustanovení o jmenování nezávislé odborné skupiny.
 Složení správní rady
 Vzhledem k rozhodujícímu vlivu
 členů z členských států, které se účastní jednotného
 mechanismu dohledu nebo s ním úzce spolupracují, při volbě
 správní rady (prostá většina přítomných členů) nemohly být
 členské státy, které se mechanismu neúčastní, ve správní radě
 řádně zastoupeny. V návrhu se proto mění složení správní
 rady orgánu pro bankovnictví, aby bylo její složení vyrovnané a odráželo
 složení EU jako celku a aby v něm byly zastoupeny i členské
 státy, které se mechanismu neúčastní. Nově tak budou ve správní
 radě tyto členské státy zastoupeny alespoň dvěma
 členy.
 Článek 45 nařízení o orgánu pro
 bankovnictví se proto mění tak, aby správní rada nově zahrnovala
 alespoň dva členské státy, které se jednotného mechanismu dohledu
 neúčastní.
 Přezkum způsobu hlasování na
 základě dalšího vývoje
 Aby byl zohledněn jakýkoli vývoj
 v řadě členských států, jejichž měnou je euro
 nebo jejichž příslušné orgány začaly úzce spolupracovat podle
 článku 6 nařízení .../...., Komise se žádá, aby přezkoumala navržená
 ustanovení s cílem zjistit, zda na


text:
základě takového vývoje nejsou nezbytné
 případné další úpravy, aby bylo zajištěno, že orgán pro bankovnictví přijímá
 rozhodnutí v zájmu udržení a posílení vnitřního trhu v oblasti
 finančních služeb.
 5. ROZPOČTOVÉ DŮSLEDKY
 Návrh nemá
 žádné důsledky pro rozpočet EU.
 2012/0244 (COD)
 Návrh
 NAŘÍZENÍ EVROPSKÉHO PARLAMENTU A
 RADY,
 kterým se mění nařízení (EU)
 č. 1093/2010 o zřízení Evropského orgánu dohledu (Evropského orgánu
 pro bankovnictví), pokud jde o jeho vztah k nařízení Rady (EU)
 č. .../..., kterým se Evropské centrální bance svěřují zvláštní
 úkoly týkající se politik, které se vztahují k obezřetnostnímu dohledu nad
 úvěrovými institucemi
 EVROPSKÝ PARLAMENT A RADA EVROPSKÉ
 UNIE,
 s ohledem na Smlouvu o fungování
 Evropské unie, a zejména na článek 114 této smlouvy,
 s ohledem na návrh Evropské komise,
 po postoupení návrhu legislativního aktu
 vnitrostátním parlamentům,
 s ohledem na stanovisko Evropského
 hospodářského a sociálního výboru[1],
 s ohledem na stanovisko Evropské
 centrální banky[2],
 v souladu s řádným
 legislativním postupem,
 vzhledem k těmto důvodům:
 (1) Dne 29. června 2012
 hlavy států a předsedové vlád zemí eurozóny vyzvali Komisi, aby
 předložila návrhy ustavující jednotný mechanismus dohledu, do kterého by
 byla zapojena Evropská centrální banka. Evropská rada ve svých závěrech
 z 29. června 2012 vyzvala předsedu Evropské rady, aby v úzké
 spolupráci s předsedou Komise, předsedou Euroskupiny a prezidentem
 Evropské centrální banky připravil konkrétní harmonogram pro dosažení
 skutečné hospodářské a měnové unie, jenž by obsahoval konkrétní
 návrhy na zachování jednoty a celistvosti jednotného trhu finančních
 služeb a jenž by zohledňoval prohlášení zemí eurozóny a záměr Komise
 předložit návrhy založené na článku 127 Smlouvy o fungování Evropské
 unie.
 (2) Ustavení jednotného
 mechanismu dohledu je prvním krokem k vytvoření evropské bankovní
 unie, která je založena na skutečně jednotném souboru pravidel pro
 finanční služby a kterou tvoří také společný rámec pro
 pojištění vkladů a restrukturalizaci.
 (3) K naplnění
 jednotného mechanismu dohledu svěřuje nařízení Rady (EU) č.
 .../...[3] [nařízení podle čl.
 127 odst. 6 SFEU] Evropské centrální bance zvláštní úkoly týkající se politik,
 které se vztahují k obezřetnostnímu dohledu nad úvěrovými institucemi
 v členských státech, jejichž měnou je euro. Ostatní členské
 státy mohou s Evropskou centrální bankou navázat úzkou spolupráci.
 V rámci uvedeného nařízení má Evropská centrální banka koordinovat a
 uvádět postoj těchto členských států k rozhodnutím, která
 má přijmout rada orgánů dohledu Evropského orgánu pro bankovnictví (dále
 jen „orgán pro bankovnictví“) a která patří mezi úkoly Evropské centrální
 banky.
 (4) Skutečnost, že jsou
 Evropské centrální bance ve vztahu k některým členským státům
 Unie svěřeny úkoly dohledu v bankovnictví, by neměla nijak
 narušit fungování vnitřního trhu v oblasti finančních služeb. Je
 proto nezbytné zajistit řádné fungování orgánu pro bankovnictví poté, co
 budou Evropské centrální bance tyto úkoly svěřeny.
 (5) Vzhledem k úkolům
 v oblasti dohledu, které byly Evropské centrální bance svěřeny
 nařízením Rady (EU) č. .../... [nařízení podle čl. 127 odst. 6
 SFEU], by měl být orgán pro bankovnictví schopen vykonávat své úkoly také
 ve vztahu k Evropské centrální bance. Měl by být stanoven zvláštní
 postup, aby byly stávající mechanismy pro urovnávání sporů a opatření
 v mimořádných situacích i nadále účinné. Zejména pokud Evropská
 centrální banka nevyhoví


text:
opatření orgánu pro bankovnictví, které má za cíl
 urovnání sporů nebo řešení mimořádné situace, měla by podat
 vysvětlení. V takovém případě by měl orgán pro
 bankovnictví přijmout individuální rozhodnutí určené dotčené
 finanční instituci, pokud má na základě požadavků stanovených
 v přímo použitelných právních předpisech Unie tuto možnost.
 (6) Měl by být upraven
 způsob hlasování v radě orgánů dohledu – zejména pokud jde
 o rozhodnutí, která orgán pro bankovnictví přijímá prostou většinou
 členů –, aby byly odpovídajícím způsobem zohledněny zájmy
 všech členských států a aby mohl orgán pro bankovnictví
 řádně fungovat v zájmu zachování a prohlubování vnitřního
 trhu v oblasti finančních služeb.
 (7) Rozhodnutími týkajícími se
 porušení práva Unie a urovnávání sporů by se měla zabývat nezávislá odborná
 skupina složená z členů rady orgánů dohledu
 s hlasovacím právem, u nichž nedochází k žádnému střetu
 zájmů a které jmenuje rada orgánů dohledu. Rozhodnutí, která odborná
 skupina radě orgánů dohledu navrhne, by se měla považovat za
 přijatá, nejsou-li zamítnuta prostou většinou, která by měla
 zahrnovat odpovídající počet hlasů členů zastupujících členské
 státy, které se jednotného mechanismu dohledu účastní, a členů
 zastupujících členské státy, které se mechanismu neúčastní.
 (8) Na členy nezávislé
 odborné skupiny zřízené podle čl. 41 odst. 2 nařízení (EU)
 č. 1093/2010 by nemělo být nahlíženo tak, že jsou ve střetu
 zájmů, pokud jediným důvodem je, že zastupují příslušné orgány,
 které jsou součástí jednotného mechanismu dohledu, a že má odborná skupina
 rozhodovat ve věci, která se týká jednotného mechanismu dohledu. Orgán pro
 bankovnictví by měl vypracovat jednací řád odborné skupiny, který
 zajistí její nezávislost a objektivitu.
 (9) Složení správní rady by
 mělo být vyvážené a mělo by v ní být zajištěno řádné
 zastoupení členských států, které se jednotného mechanismu dohledu
 neúčastní.
 (10) V zájmu řádného
 fungování orgánu pro bankovnictví a odpovídajícího zastoupení všech
 členských států by měly být způsob hlasování, složení
 správní rady a složení nezávislé odborné skupiny po odpovídající době přehodnoceny
 s ohledem na získané zkušenosti a další vývoj.
 (11) Jelikož cílů tohoto
 nařízení, totiž zajištění vysoké, efektivní a jednotné
 úrovně obezřetnostní regulace a dohledu v celé Evropské
 unii, ochrany integrity, účinnosti a řádného fungování
 finančních trhů a udržování stability finančního systému, nemůže
 být uspokojivě dosaženo na úrovni členských států, a proto
 jich může být z důvodu rozsahu tohoto nařízení lépe
 dosaženo na úrovni Unie, může Unie přijmout opatření
 v souladu se zásadou subsidiarity stanovenou v článku 5
 Smlouvy o Evropské unii. V souladu se zásadou proporcionality
 stanovenou v uvedeném článku nepřekračuje toto
 nařízení rámec toho, co je nezbytné pro dosažení daných cílů,
 PŘIJALY TOTO NAŘÍZENÍ:
 Článek 1
 Nařízení (EU) č. 1093/2010 se
 mění takto:
 1. V článku 4 se bod 2
 podbod i) nahrazuje tímto:
 „i) příslušné orgány ve smyslu
 směrnic 2006/48/ES a 2006/49/ES, včetně Evropské centrální banky
 ve vztahu k záležitostem týkajícím se úkolů, které jsou jí
 svěřeny nařízením Rady (EU) č. .../...* [nařízení Rady
 podle čl. 127 odst. 6 SFEU], ve smyslu směrnice 2007/64/ES a
 příslušné orgány uvedené ve směrnici 2009/110/ES;
 __________________________
 * Úř. věst. L ..., ....., s.... “
 2. Článek 18 se mění
 takto:
 a) Odstavec