{"CAPTION FIG1.png": "'\\n\\n**Abstract**\\n\\nThe thesis deals with the study of the role of the \"weak\" and \"strong\" \"strong\" \"strong\" \"strong\" \"strong\" \"strong\" \"strong\" \"strong\" \"strong\" \"strong\" \"strong\" \"strong\" \"strong\" \"strong\" \"strong\" \"strong\" \"strong\" \"strong\" \"strong\" \"strong\" \"strong\" \"strong\" \"strong\" \"strong\" \"strong\" \"strong\" \"strong\" \"strong\" \"strong\" \"strong\" \" \"strong\" \"strong\"'", "CAPTION FIG2.png": "'Figure 2: Unconditional model: Longitudinality of candidate preference. Note. \\\\(\\\\chi^{\\\\perp}_{\\\\zeta}=0.42\\\\); df = 1; normed fit index (NFI) = .9%; Tucker\u2013Lewis index (TLU) = 1.00; comparative fit index (CFI) = 1.00; root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) = .00.\\n\\n'", "CAPTION FIG3.png": "'Figure 3: Conditional model: Political expression and candidate preference. Note. Enries are unstandardized coefficients with standard errors in parentheses. Estimated coefficients for control variables are not presented in this figure for parsimony, but full results are available upon request. \\\\(\\\\chi^{2}\\\\) = 18.96; df = 13; normed fit index (NFI) = .98; Tucker-Lewis index (TLI) = .95; comparative fit index (CFI) = .99; root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) = .03.\\n\\n'", "CAPTION TAB1.png": "'* [10] A.\\n\\n'"}