jkeisling/hacker-news-corpus-2007-2022 huggingface dataset:
Its competitors DNAnexus and Seven Bridges seem to be US based, or at least report having offices there. But Lifebit is recruiting internationally, and even has a US office now too, so AFAIK it should also be a valid option for US folks.
You own the servers. This is a tool to build your own object-storage cluster. For example, you can get 3 old desktop PCs, install Linux on them, download and launch Garage on them, configure your 3 instances in a single cluster, then send data to this cluster. Your data will be spread and duplicated on the 3 machines. If one machine fails or is offline, you can still access and write data to the cluster.
I think the critics see the amount of bugs in code that has been tested much more than self-driving cars and have very reasonable doubts about giving over something as important as driving. Even without (say) foreign actors trying to hack the cars or jamming the sensors, they seem to keep driving into stationary objects all on their own.
It depends. The "attribution" requirements can be a bit onerous at times, in ways that might put the most casual and opportunistic reusers of even CC-BY-SA data at some legal risk. (It's of course easier for a legitimate reuser with an actual stake in the data to dot the i's and cross the t's.)
vue3 is still much easier for newcomers to grasp comparing to react, biggest difference though is still js-in-html vs html-in-js.

vite is from vue3 originally, I consider it's one of the best 'by-product' from vue3, it's 10x simpler than webpack and 10x faster too, I use it for all javascript/typescript projects nowadays.
I agree with pretty much everything you said. My statement was not a defense of watching Baywatch but rather a comment on watching everything being highly dependent on your workplace situation and culture.

In an office setting the background noise can be highly disruptive, for example.
Considering that iDisk didn't had any integration with any OS other than Apple's OSX, I really wonder why didn't had the Dropbox success...
I agree that things like "Go To Definition" can be pretty bad (especially when a codebase has code that is auto-generated, but you haven't figured out how yet).

But I'm curious, what benefits do you see in your approach over just doing a grep in the folder (or e.g. Ctrl+Shift+F "Find in Files" in Pycharm)?
The meaning relevant in this case is generally the community surrounding the LessWrong website and associated other communities (not necessarily exclusive to those who have actually used the website LessWrong though.)

(There's also a different older meaning in philosophy which is largely unrelated)

a (joke) inductive definition:

base case: Elizier Yudkowsky is a rationalist.

inductive case: Anyone who frequently argues with rationalists is a rationalist.

The community speaks a fair bit about how to deal with psychological bias, and also talks about Bayesian reasoning, decision theory, etc. Also talks about what conversational norms are helpful in facilitating productive discussion especially in the presence of disagreement, etc.

There are also those who would be called "rationalist-adjacent" who, well, people who are socially-near "rationalists", but, fairly similar topics discussed.

There have been some attempts to use the phrase "aspiring rationalist" rather than "rationalist", and to reserve the term "rationalist" to refer to hypothetical idealized practitioners of the ideas.

Also, sometimes people shorten "rationalist" to "rat".
Energy cost scales with value of coins produced. As the price of bitcoin goes up so does the cost of energy and equipment used for mining. Market searching optimum.

This will be fixed at some point, but the point when rewards get low is very far away... So if Bitcoin were really come the one true currency with global market cap, the costs would be enormous...
Dude is totally stealing Vannevar Bush's ideas. :)
Do they have troops at their embassies?
Quite rare to jump straight to an MRI - a chest MRI is a half hour deal.
More common to do a CT Chest which has a 1:500 risk of causing cancer
Ask yourself honestly. If BLM or an Islamic American group had done the same thing yesterday. How many deaths would there have been? I'm guessing we'd be counting in percentages not fingers...something like 75% dead, 25% captured/in prison.

For doing the SAME thing in the SAME location.

I know, it's hard to prove, here say, but you know it's true. Snipers would've been out in force. Cops were high fiving and letting these people in. National Guard was told to stand down. Police were taking selfies with confederates holding flags in the People's building.

This was a desecration of democracy and the rule of law in America. Everyone responsible needs at least 20 years in prison. No exceptions. Trying to disrupt our republic should have some consequences, no?
https://imgz.org
Must be because the earth is flat now
A poll book is typically used at a polling location. However, with absentee ballots, it works a little differently. In previous elections, to get an absentee ballot, you needed to request one, which had the equivalent effect to a poll book in that there was a record or paper trail that you were voting absentee. However, in many states in the 2020 election, no such request for an absentee ballot was required. In fact, some states just mailed you an absentee ballot without having to request one. This is where the poll book methodology you laid out breaks down. Suddenly your poll book is the entire voter roll.
Well I suppose after inciting a mob to storm the parliament it's entirely defensible his group gets the ban. I am generally not a fan of banning political groups based on their stance alone but this one is getting dangerous.
The day the bulk of far-left idealists advocate violence and racism, they won't be tolerated either.
We've also created a build of SproutCore that fits into a single, <50k gzipped file. It's definitely experimental, but you can find an example application running it here (built using HTML5 Boilerplate):

http://amber-todos.strobeapp.com/ (demo)

https://github.com/wycats/experimental-amber-todos (source)
lol, only on Hacker News...
I'm getting a 509, bandwidth limit exceeded. Here's the Google Cache: http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache%3Ahttp%...
The article presents a fairly plausible theory, but no actual evidence to support incredibly serious accusations. It certainly sounds like the case was beneficial to Cisco, but the theory completely disregards the idea that the founder actually did commit these crimes. "[I]ntentionally accessing a protected computer system without authorization for the purposes of commercial advantage" certainly sounds like something the founder of a company wanting to sell software that Cisco has exclusive rights to might do. And what if they are both in the wrong? Perhaps Alfred-Adekeye did hack into their systems, but they only filed suit in retaliation? The author is simply assuming the corporation must be abusing power, and that the US Attorney's office is extremely susceptible to corporate influence. I would consider that to be a much bigger story than the reason why Cisco did this. If this article is true, I don't care about why they did it, I care about how they did it. The fact that this is completely ignored and no evidence provided makes me doubtful.
Hello I see from your great karma that you could better advise me. How can I do better?
See also LIBLINEAR:

http://www.csie.ntu.edu.tw/~cjlin/liblinear/

(and liblinear-java), which might make more sense if you have lots of data.

All of those are BSD-licensed which means they are actually useful in real life. Good stuff.
I really like the framing you used: 'exclusionary forms of inclusion'. Really encapsulates it well.
> Germany stopping buying gas now will neither stop the war, nor it will prevent Russian military from receiving money from Russian government

Please provide your facts that providing Russia with more funds won't prolong and extend their war in Europe.

We can call your assertion a perversion of facts and opinions if you like. It is absolutely fact-less to say that immediate stop will not have a significant positive impact. An opinion one might say.

It is a fact that nation do see the purchase of conflict resources as an contributing factor for prolonging wars. Europe might stop buying fossil fuels from Russia in 5-10-20 years from now. It is also a Fact that we don't know if it will be too late, what Russia will do in the mean time, nor how they will react to more sanctions. The risk is that Russia will invade more countries if funding continue is only something which people can estimate, like the risk that a nuclear accident might occur within that time frame.

Please provide your crystal ball for inspection.
> Posts are shared with all of your confirmed friends once published (let the people in your life know what you’ve been up to)

That part also seems weird to me, and also why I never really post anything to facebook these days (even if I used it more than once a month). Unless the things you're writing are stupidly generic they won't appeal to all your friends, especially since "social media friends" these days also means family, coworkers, acquaintences, that one guy you did a college project with and never talked to again, etc. Not actual friends.

I know which of my friends are interested in what, and I can share what I know they'll be interested in hearing via DMs, leading to more productive discussions. I'm not sure what the appeal of friend-only self posts even is these days, unless you're planning a get together of some sort.

If you're making a self post, there must be people that you don't know about that can see it, so there is some chance that you'll find someone new that's interested in what you posted. E.g. posting in fb or discord groups or in public like on reddit or here.
I believe AWS CDK is actually written in JS, natively, and ported to other languages, inc. Python, using sort of a transpiler they created for that purpose.
Could you somehow whitelist all domains and go from there?

Not on a computer right now to try it out for myself, but it sounds like an interesting approach.
So i am not courteous and now what?
>the title implies "the heavy lifting" is written in LISP.

Woo uses fast-http[0], quri[1], and http-body[2], all written in pure Common Lisp and very, very fast.

[0]: https://github.com/fukamachi/fast-http

[1]: https://github.com/fukamachi/quri

[2]: https://github.com/fukamachi/http-body
The origin of these developments was the Unite d'Habitation theory (and practice) of Corbusier in the 1940's.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unit%C3%A9_d%27Habitation

Two issues : living in the south of France is rather different to living in the big cities of the east coast USA, or in northern Europe. Cold, dark and wet mean that life is really different for the apartment dwellers.

Second, small changes to the implementation, minor drops in quality, alteration to the spaces create deep problems with the practice of living in these buildings. Implementing the vision of Corbusier requires genius, and genius is something that is in short supply.
I haven't tried ublock yet, is it obvious how to work back from a broken page to figure out which blacklists need adjusting?

I'd also recommend that the defaults should have YouTube and Facebook (at least) working out of the box. Otherwise I think people will just uninstall the plugin, rather than trying to figure out how to fix it, which would be a shame.
The author is a very experienced games network programmer whose recent credits include the multiplatform fps Titanfall.
You can remove the 'probably'. It is pretty well known that Adblock is a mayor memory hog.
To expand on that:

If the user doesn't have an client-side email client setup (eg, they use Gmail/Hotmail via the browser) a box will pop up prompting them to setup an email account.

Even if they do have one setup up, most users will immediately dismiss the email, so you'll never get it.

This is different to serverside email, where the client submits a form to the server, and the server sends you an email.

Unlike the "mailto:" method, the second method will actually get you some responses.
Rest assured that there is absolutely no chance of a dangerous equipment malfunction prior to your victory candescence.
Reverse DNS lookups only return one designated name for the IP, not all records referencing the IP.
Fact: the worlds biggest and most spectacular privacy-breaching operation is being run by veritably democratic states, the "west". It's not some evil dictator who dictates this, it's the majority of citizens who demands spying on the rest. Another fact is that there are no major (think, ukraine-size) protests about this anywhere.

My conclusion is that even democracy demands some privacy breach. Privacy may be protecting individual rights but it's not a prerequisite for democracy.
> Civilized people remind their friends, coworkers and clients to follow-up on important emails.

Civilized people have inboxes and outboxes. If an e-mail isn't transferred to the the inbox, the pending-action category, then any attempt to change its status by repeat mails is at the very least disrespectful of the recipient's choice of priorities.

All I am saying is that you need to find out how people think about these things. You're well past explaining, now you're rationalizing.
I highly recommend the book 109 East Palace, by Jennet Conant. It's a great look into the day-to-day life of the people working on the project, and some of the logistical challenges which were faced as everything scaled up.
I'm fairly sure someone smarter and with more time than me could trace an interesting parallel between East and West policies when it comes to the internet, comparing the leaks about GCHQ[1] and this post. Perhaps an "infinite monkeys" vs "carefully targeted" approach?

Also, I may or may not be an employee who was told to come and disrupt the discussion here. So there's that too.

[1] https://firstlook.org/theintercept/2014/02/24/jtrig-manipula...
Dropbox is a resource hog. Unless i want my windows machine to fireup on RAM, fan speed, hard disk usage and stall, I avoid running Dropbox in background. Onedrive works better for me!
Did RadioShack have any customers?
You have to separate the medium and the message. Does the RFE/RL have self-interest in disclosing a story that is critical of Russia? Probably.

Are the facts of the story in dispute because Radio Free Europe happened to publish the interview? This I'm not so sure of.

Also writing a comment like this in the context of the linked article fills me with a sense of dread. Am I merely emulating the villain troll perspective by refuting your claim and (seemingly) suiting my biases? Will it be possible to have discussions in the future without a subtext of having some covert motive?
> Did you know that you can run diff over ssh to compare and contrast the code on two containers

Good luck doing that with Windows containers and diffing the HKEY_CURRENT_USER hive.

Anyways, rollback the container and start over.
Yes, it does. It's quite literally in the dictionary: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/headspace
After a decade in FANG and living a not extravagant lifestyle, you could easily have a couple million socked away.

That at least gives you breathing room to do whatever for a few years.
I think you've got the nail on the head. It's sort of the tragedy of the commons, which in terms of recommenders is a really easy thing to accidentally optimize for. For example, pop music is popular. In the early days, recommenders would just recommend pop music because on average that was a decent recommendation. We've come a long ways since then. Well, everyone but Facebook has.
You just gave out the idea to someone to do just that
Hey I suggest you try installing it on WSL (Windows Subsystem for Linux). I tried it just last week to do some hacking different from my usual C#/Visual Studio development and was pleasantly surprised it mostly worked out of the box. To render more nicely I had to install X Window for Windows (can't remember the exact name of the library) but it was pretty much a very good experience. Only limitation I can think is you should not access linux files from Windows, but the other way around has no problem.

Also (may be different from your use case), using tramp-mode has mostly eliminated the need to run the emacs inside the server, I run it locally and fetches files using ssh.
Yes, that's the thing. Well, I will keep thinking on it. Hopefully you'll find yourself moderating with a new form of curiosity about what makes everyone on here tick, and what is going on under the covers to make them behave the way they do.
Interesting that this was done very shortly after the DOTGOV bill was introduced. It's possible that this attack was done by a supporter of the DOTGOV bill in order to provide evidence to help the bill pass.
z/OS is a much weirder Unix than macOS, although it depends on how you define "general use". But, there are a lot of enterprises out there which still run IBM mainframes, even if they often aren't keen on advertising that fact, and a huge lot of stuff in z/OS now depends on the Unix subsystem, in particular anything written in Java (which IBM has been heavily encouraging as a development language on mainframes, resulting in a lot of hybrid apps which are a mix of newish Java code and ancient COBOL/assembler/etc working together.)

(Some people will question whether z/OS really counts as a "Unix", but like macOS, it is actually a certified Unix, and as such has greater official claim to be Unix than FreeBSD or most Linux does.)

(Addendum: I say "most Linux", because while the vast majority of Linux distributions are not certified Unix, some have been. Right now, Huawei EulerOS is a certified Unix based on a Linux distribution. Inspur K-UX is another Linux distribution which used to have Unix certification, although the certification has expired–I guess they failed to pay the renewal fees.)
Generics are a nice feature to avoid code duplication. However, they are not required to be used in every application. Whatever the solution is, it should not affect code that doesn't require the use of generics. If the entire language is affected (such as a slower runtime because of the need to box/unbox) that would be a step down.
The most popular Windows games are still available: Solitaire and Minesweeper!
I agree. It would be nice to see the president or some government official at least publicly acknowledge that a US-based company is currently under attack by the Chinese government.
No, clusters are multi-tenant. We have a cap on the number of customers per cluster and we monitor usage to make sure no one customer is hammering the cluster.
You need to provide a reference to a peer-reviewed study proving that your joke is funny.
Why don't they consider something like JRuby? It's proven, and allows Ruby to run in the JVM, given Java 7's improved support for dynamic runtime.
To be clear these are attack vector prevalence relative to each other, and represent 'known' attack traffic identified by Akamai, not general traffic in these protocols.

However, this is no doubt not a complete list of DDoS vectors as it doesn't account for application level exploits like demonstrated in the GitHub attacks. And obviously not everything that is a DDoS is a protocol flood.

Either there is a way to identify those types of attacks now, or improved attack identification should be included as a requirement for the X-Prize.
Here's a book that got me started - http://www.amazon.in/Practical-Django-Projects/dp/1590599969

Practical Django Projects got me started with a simple webapp in around 24 hours.
The question is too open-ended. There are many proposed alternatives to what we have now, and "internet" itself has several meanings. There are technical alternatives (like mesh topologies - http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2014/06/the-pr... - or simply requiring that all communications be encrypted), regulatory changes (eg, regulated essential utility, nationalization of all internet services), and organizational changes (decentralization of sites like Facebook and YouTube).

An alternative to the current internet could be that all people who connect to the internet are required to login to a government server, using biometrics and a password from a security token.

I feel a lot different about that than a decentralized mesh topology.
To a first approximation, nobody cares. Inside particular segments of the tech community, lots of people care. But the tech community is very small on an absolute scale and its segments even smaller.

The other group of people who care are those engaged in ongoing cyber warfare. To them Github is probably not worth defending at the risk of escalating to a wider cyber and economic conflict.

Even should US government cyber warefare assets attribute the attack directly to an entity with a direct relationship to 中华人民共和国 diplomatic corps, why would the US deploy assets to protect a company that is knowingly violating 中华人民共和国 policy? Github is neither required nor prohibited from hosting projects that violate 中华人民共和国 foreign or domestic policy. It has made a business decision for business reasons.

Don't get me wrong, I am not defending 中华人民共和国 policies in regard to the dissemination of information and propaganda [or the US policies regarding the same]. Nor am I criticizing or praising Github's business decisions. I am just explaining what I believe is the case, not what I think should or should not be the case.
There's a big difference between the types of research that big pharma and academia undertake. To be very general about it, corporate R&D is a lower-risk endeavor. They focus on getting reasonably-well-proven ideas to market. For them, there is always a clear end game of passing the regulatory hurdles, ramping up manufacturing, and handling distribution and marketing efforts.

In academia, researchers don't typically set out with an end game like that. They see a set of problems, and they want to test hypotheses to see if they can find ways to solve those problems. Again, in the most general sense, they aren't think entrepreneurially about scaling their technology or clearing various FDA milestones. They've done the hard part in terms of isolating the proteins or synthesizing compounds. Maybe they've even run preliminary tests to prove efficacy in certain ways. For our researchers, their next step isn't to cash out. They want to get more funding for their labs to hire more postdocs to investigate more hypotheses and get more work published. No, they never complain when their piece of the pie trickles down to them from all of the royalty splits and cost recoveries. Still, that's not what they live for. We have had a few researchers make the leap to the corporate world after their ideas have been proven, but that's definitely an exception.

The important part here is that these inventors never know ahead of time if their ideas will ever pan out or get of of their lab. It's all a big risk. They apply for grants, the government reviews those applications, they decide if the risk is worth it based on a number of factors, and if all works out the researcher gets a chance to prove out their ideas. This early-stage, high-risk investigation is really rare in corporate R&D. In fact, even after some of our technologies have received traction and attention, there is often still too much risk for big pharma to jump on board. In recent years, we've had to get creative with funding sources and early-stage VCs to build startups around certain technologies we believe in just to get them to the point that a bigger partner is willing to jump in.
Well now there is
Thanks, I'm doing iOS development however!
If you really want to take your elliptical outdoors there's always the ElliptiGo: http://www.elliptigo.com/ I've seen a surprising number of these around Boulder CO.