> ...as almost no medical decisions are not made by me individually. We actually have a board of veterinarians meeting weekly to ensure our standards of care are the very best as peered review practices are generally the gold standard. I do not know the exact number of years experience combined we have, but it is greater than any individual veterinarian.

I'm not sure what you're trying to say. It's great that you have established practices for the vets in your network in an effort to ensure a high standard of care, but what makes you think that other vets don't adopt best practices? Just because you assemble a team ("board") of vets with, say, 70 years of combined experience doesn't mean a lot to me. I could pull 10 software engineers with 40 years of combined experience into a room and it wouldn't mean that I have access to more expertise than a single engineer with 20 years of experience.

As for "almost no medical decisions are not made by me individually," this is confusing to me. Let's say you palpate a dog on a house call and feel a mass. Are you not going to make certain decisions on the spot? Is every decision or recommendation a vet in your network makes reviewed by a team whose members may not have actually had the opportunity to physically evaluate the pet?

> There is a lot of issues regarding the management of pet health care that has not been worked out. Luckily we don't have the same amount of regulation that makes it difficult to create software readily, but it is also not a lucrative business to just make veterinary software. There are also currently no veterinary practices built around technology that I am aware of either which means most record systems actually decrease a veterinarians efficiency rather than improving it and are primarily designed to track billing and inventory. Our software is being built from the ground up ensuring that it allows vets to focus on what they do best, practice medicine.

This is all very non-specific.

Again, I'll use my experience as an example. I have received high-quality, cost-effective service from my mobile vet. She arrives on time, is responsive and very cost-effective. In short, she has taken great care of my pet, access to special software or not. When she identified an issue that demanded the expertise of a specialist, a referral was made to one of the best specialty centers in Northern California. All of my pet's records were transferred within hours.

With all due respect, it is absolutely not true that there are "no veterinary practices built around technology." The specialty center I was referred to, which is staffed by board certified vets, makes extensive use of technology. Is a practice with everything from an on-site CT scan to one of newest linear accelerators available for radiation therapy in pets not "built around technology"?

In short, you seem to believe that custom practice management software with a mobile booking app makes you a technology-based veterinary practice. While I see nothing wrong with the nature of your service and wish you the best of luck, I would simply suggest that you're underestimating what the word "technology" means in modern veterinary medicine. Of course, this "wrap a mobile app around a service business and call it a technology business" approach is widespread today and not exclusive to your industry, so anything that I wrote here which might be construed as criticism applies to many startups.

Finally, as for "but it is also not a lucrative business to just make veterinary software," you might want to look at http://www.henryschein.com, a Fortune 500 company that did hundreds of millions of dollars in sales of dental, medical and vet practice management software in 2013.