jkeisling/hacker-news-corpus-2007-2022 huggingface dataset:
Article 28 also states:

> Any Tribunal award under this Part shall be publicly available, subject to the redaction of confidential information.

> To the extent necessary to ensure the protection of confidential information, including business confidential information, the Tribunal may hold portions of hearings in camera.

> To the extent that a Tribunal’s confidentiality order designates information as confidential and a Contracting Party’s law on access to information requires public access to that information, the Contracting Party’s law on access to information shall prevail. However, a Contracting Party should endeavour to apply its law on access to information so as to protect information designated confidential by the Tribunal.

Article 33 states:

> Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to require a Contracting Party to furnish or allow access to information the disclosure of which would impede law enforcement or would be contrary to the Contracting Party’s law protecting Cabinet confidences, personal privacy or the confidentiality of the financial affairs and accounts of individual customers of financial institutions.

That's more than enough rope to hang public access.
Imho the most important part of the x86 standardization is the IBM pc platform. Arm boards doesn't have an equivalent platform to standardize on, so everybody does their own thing.
Thats an art project about raising awareness. Just turn the phone off.
The world might have not come to a screeching halt, but if even one of the owners of those credit cards got their identity stolen, that person's life probably was/will be a living nightmare for years.

It's exceedingly hard to clear up identity theft. It takes years, and an enormous amount of time that's taken out of your personal and work time.
Very interesting. I also found quiet a lot of inspiration from reading about the Oberon system. This author was inspired by the text editor, I was more interested in the language. The author uses 'peice chains' as opposed to a gap buffer which was new to me.

I'm sure many will say, why another editor? I say why not? Looks like a fun project.
Wren appear very cool but I think Finch is more my cup of tea. Anyone has feedback on Finch or an opinion on Finch vs Wren?
With the major caveat, of course, that you can't read your obituary when it's 'realised'.
> pay at least for very basic existence.

Can we put these in specific and measurable criteria? What you've written is a great sound bite and easy to get behind as written, but it's meaningless unless we all agree on what constitutes a "very basic existence". I doubt you'd find consensus on what qualifies as a "very basic existence".
not to derail your interesting question (which I also want to know the answer to), but I'm super curious about that account: managed by an automated y combinator investment firm? can you elaborate on what that means?
True, but most Rust zealots (including me, though I'm reformed) haven't contributed anything to LLVM.

Most Rust developers aren't Rust zealots. It's largely people who are new to the language, I think.
Or, 5 years isn't that long from now... for comparison (from CrunchBase) Dropbox was part of the Summer 2007 batch. So, in the context of this bet, they would have had to have had a valuation of 3B in 2012 (assuming the rest of the batch failed).

As of Jan 1, 2012, their most recent funding would have been a Series B round for $250M at ~ $4B. So, in this case, Sam would have won.

In my opinion, #3 is a little unfair, just because there are significantly more startups in these YC batches than in years past. I wouldn't be surprised if the entire W15 batch hit $3B in total valuation by the end of the year. There are roughly 100 in this batch, so they would only need an average of $30M in valuation for Sam to win #3.
But why React Native? Reactjs for web makes sense as browsers struggle with DOM manipulation.

Native apps rendering capacity is sub-micro seconds. Hoping for Appcelerator's dreaming Hyperloop that give us native JS capabilities.

I still plan to use ReactJs (web) within web-view.
I'm quite a noob concerning law stuff, can you please provide a little explanation about its patent? Thank you for your attention.
Here's a book that I had a random encounter with at a teenager, that gave me an excellent understanding of how computers work at the lowest levels: http://www.amazon.com/Code-Language-Computer-Hardware-Softwa...

It basically starts with a "code" of two friends talking to each other between houses at night via blinking flashlights, and gradually builds up from there to a full, if somewhat barebones, microprocessor, logic gate by logic gate. And it does so in a way that teenage me was able to follow.
Google Messenger? (Although Google accounts try really hard to get your phone number, I don't know that it's ever required).

Anything XMPP based.. you could just use any old XMPP server and client.
Insight by Wired: http://www.wired.com/2015/03/periscope/
I know some folk that studied abroad in China as part of their US-based undergraduate program (US faculty teaching their courses in China), and they had a very stressful experience due to the seemingly widespread amount cheating by the Chinese students throwing off the grading curves. The university seemed to ignore it for political reasons.
The foundation was created as a project of the core team. Nobody was a "special guest." All parties agreed to the terms. That's what the founders of an organization does.

Again, specifically: what control are you worried about? I suspect that you think the foundation has powers it does not have.
After reading some of sites' other posts I think it's just not a reliable source of information. The 'science' is hand picked to support the author's arguments. This is no different them the candida, sugar or vitamin proponents. They all have scientific explanations and plans of action.
I can't stop laughing. To say that it is merely extremely accurate would be a travesty of the english language.

lol, fuck. I remember every goddamned thing on that page.

The dude coding in the lower right was a nice touch. Haven't seen that in a long time.
For those who don't know the history:
https://www.cnet.com/news/sun-microsoft-settle-java-suit/
the best condom is higher education for the ladies.

the west is facing a population crunch, as ladies are spending their more fertile years studying.
Concerning the form of this presentation, if it were gauged in WTFs per minute, this one would score a rather high count.
It was an art project -- called "Postal Codes" -- where an artist friend and I would correspond by creating sketches (typically using p5.js or three.js) and sending them by "snail" mail. There is a bit more information here [0], here [1] and here [2].

[0] https://www.instagram.com/p/B9MhMzKHVxJ/

[1] https://www.instagram.com/p/B7wL7MKly3k/ (description in Spanish and then English)

[2] https://github.com/gregsadetsky/postal-codes (project description, "rules", and source code)
Freedom from your job, commute and sorting out your kids by 8pm seems like a good deal for most working dads
Facebook doesn't have ambitious projects? Wtf?

Facebook's instant personalization is the most interesting piece of web infrastructure since, well, advent of the web itself. It's scary too, but big, fundamental improvements usually are.

If they succeed, Facebook will become something much more important than a giant walled garden. Walled gardens wither eventually, but being a critical piece of web infra, that's something huge.
Yea I've seen a Youtube video of someone adjusting a Yamaha keyboard to play notes on middle eastern scales.
Something like this? ;)

http://www.hollywoodedge.com/Foley-Footsteps-Sonic-Boon-P39....

Foley is a pretty interesting area for one whose ultimate aim is to be completely unnoticed:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foley_artist
My mom is on Facebook (sorry, not a joke) but even if her age was the limit, that still means that Facebook will be relevant for 20+ years.

So I doubt that is what is going to kill Facebook.
Obviously, there are many bad things about secrecy, but:

1) Are you arguing that there should never be secret negotiations?

2) If (1), what system do you propose that would allow negotiators to break deadlocks in the pre-conditions for negotiation?

For example of (2):

A opening position: we won't recognize you unless you first give us what we want.

B opening position: we can't give you what you want until you recognize us.

Secretly, both A, B, their constituencies, et. al. would accept solution X, but they can't even start to get to X.
Worth reading but the highlight is the slides he sends to organisers "when pressed hard": http://www.crypto.com/papers/rsa2011-blaze.pdf
And it's usually accompanied by the adjective "elegant", which I find rather baffling.

"Cute" or "cryptic", perhaps.
I always thought it was "The Fine Article".
Does this cover the implied subtext? He’s writing about it because a rentier class profits off of that obsession by maintaining an environment that encourages it even when it goes to far and harms the obsessor.

That’s what “something that matters” means.

Capital decides what matters. Bus tickets matter to the person collecting them. They don’t matter to an outside like Paul graham because they don’t result in capital.
“Unconditional” is a nice euphemism for “free”. There is no such thing as a free handout (and, thusly, an unconditional handout), unless it’s coming in the form of manna from heaven.

In these limited studies that don’t affect the inflation rate or the greater macroeconomic picture, there appears to be no conditions, especially none imposed on the recipients.

If you expand a study like this, in your mind, to include e.g., the entire population of America, you don’t need to be a PhD economist to see that there are certainly conditions involved.
The EBT-based SNAP program is managed by the U.S. Department of Agriculture. The whole point of it is giving handouts to food producers; the low-income folks who happen to buy all that food and even get fat as a result are only the mechanism by which the handout is delivered. Totally corrupt, and so sad!
My feeling is that the quality of software engineering has gone up dramatically in the past decade.

> It feels like a lot engineers now days don't seem to have a good cs background. They don't see to understand things like cache, paging, virtual memory, cpu pipelines, algorithms or other things pretty fundamental to CS.

Pipelines and caches and paging and virtual memory are stupidly complicated in modern processors. If you claim to understand these things and you don't either work at the company or have an NDA with the company so that you can implement drivers, you're probably full of shit.

What I can't stand are the "highly-ranked" schools that introduce students to a very basic and abstract (and outdated) notion of these topics, and students enter the workforce overconfident that they have understood the topic. You haven't understood the topic, and having some rough notion of the topic can often times be worse than if you didn't know anything at all.

tl;dr: Modern processors are proprietary IP and you should be skeptical of anyone who claims to deeply understand it but doesn't work for the company making it. You do not need to understand how one works to be a great software engineer.

https://www.agner.org/optimize/microarchitecture.pdf
Gödel theorem does not say anything about the real world.
Mathematics are a superset of physics as they allow to explain all possible universes not just our.
I've yet to see one concrete statement that ZFC can't explain. There's a list of such statements on wiki if I remember well.
This likely happens when the upcoming recession is brutal, which was the case in 2008. But if the recession is moderate it could be anticipated for.

I also believe that a moderate recession every decade is healthy, cleaning up the economical landscape of unproductive investments.
SW development isn't real engineering as computer scientists are not real engineers. That being said, we do have a generation of coders who are proficient at googling for terms then doing copying/pasting. They hit brick walls when it comes to debugging and testing code.
U2's Pre-Boy recordings (1978/79) have a very different sound because they mostly don't use delay:

http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=1616B39A07992AF0
Hopefully they see this as a business opportunity, and start selling official drivers for use with PCs. But given their track record and internal politics, somehow I doubt it. (Even if they do, you know it's going to be Windows-only).
Anyone watching a child learn will appreciate that the skill-level/time graph is not a straight line - this is particularly noticeable in sports where coaches appear to be far more aware of this fact that most teachers of academic subjects.

An example that pretty much stunned me happened with our son - he's now 11 and has been skiing since he was 3 and was pretty good, about what you would expect for the amount of time he has been doing it. However, last year he went from being pretty good to completely awesome (much better than me - to my horror/delight) - practically a step change in his skill level.

This got me thinking a lot about academic performance - I have my own history of "step changes" in performance (particularly in maths), but everyone - particularly teachers, seem to view skill progression as a simple linear progression when in reality things are an awful lot more complex than that.
There's a fine line (maybe not so fine) as to when something becomes manipulation IMHO - though if someone's paying $25 monthly for someone(s) to chat with to feel connected then I suppose they've applied an added bias or value; makes me feel a bit sad if the people aren't doing it just for fun.
Wouldn't that have been with a different language? Inform 7 is a vastly different language from Inform 1-6 (which were relatively Algol-like), and only came out in 2006.
You have to explicitly invoke buildah bud with --arch and --manifest. You can then push the manifest with podman. There is slightly less magic, which is a HUGE advantage if you operate outside of the hairline Docker happy path.
Two days ago I noticed the Insteon app was unresponsive and my hub showed a persistent red light. Their support telephone numbers ring "busy" at all hours. Word on the web is they're gone.

Truly baffling to have no communication from the company -- even their status page insists systems are operational.

Many users are finding it easy enough to migrate to Home Assistant, but the whole experience leaves a bad taste.

I hope that the technology/patents land in good hands; Insteon's combo-RF-and-powerline tech has been incredibly reliable for the seven years I've used their switches and dimmers.

Edit: Also, really demonstrates the pitfall of having an app and local hub rely on third party servers over the Internet to work. Should be a total non-starter for IoT gadgets at home.
Just as the tally sticks of english tax records since 1066 wound up first stashed under Westminster hall and then burned in the parliamentary heating boiler fires, I like to imagine some late Roman functionary looking at all the internal staff tribunal records muttering there's possibly a thesis in this on failure rates in early Roman provincial management and them flinging them into a scroll pulping machine turning them into wallpaper, coffin liners, paper maché busts of Hadrian for kiddies...

There must have been a tonne of records, of which less than 1% has survived. Arcanum, incanabula, stiffening for the spines of book binding, the bits of ancient paper which survive defy the reality of Marie Kondo through the ages.

"This record of pontius pilates tribunal for stuffing up as governor does not spark joy" riiiiip
So if Russian nukes Ukraine no one will respond militarily?
This sounds fun
One can also take water and soil samples. There are numerous labs that the samples can be sent to. They can test for hundreds of carcinogens, pesticides, heavy metals, various deadly strains of bacteria and much more. Testing is generally between $80 and $400 depending on what you ask them to test for.
> the drinking culture must change.

Why? Because a small fraction of people can't handle alcohol? If you don't want to drink, don't. But don't tell me how to live.
The problem might not be with mindfulness, but with our self-centered culture, which causes this secularized mindfulness to be a snake oil with a few personal benefits at best. It's more of a self-discipline or concentration tool when you strip it from it's culture, which used to involve ethics as I understand.
You don't have to be stoned to work here.... but it helps.
Do you happen to know anywhere to read further on the topic of programming tricks used in GBA (or any platform) games?

I always find these things really interesting.
I also think you're going to run into legal issues with this. Certainly can't just copy/paste whole articles on your server like that. Good luck with everything.
Perhaps we are arguing the same thing ultimately, but it's important to understand the distinction Google is attempting to make. They're basically trying to cover themselves by asserting that they are not granting any additional freedom beyond what the designer intended. Relicensing without permission is copyright infringement-- Google doesn't want the headache. Their safest course is to specify that unless you've been given license to do certain things by the content owner, that Google themselves is not licensing you to do those things.

Think of it like an affirmation from an open source project licensed under an MIT or BSD license. Although they might include GPL code from elsewhere, they'll generally state that they're not relicensing someone else's GPL code under the less restrictive license.
https://www.irccloud.com/pastebin/1cvm62al

this is all I could find from Twitter search:
does the timing match up at all?

11:48 AM <jecar> protip
11:48 AM <jecar> and exchange is getting hacked now
11:48 AM <jecar> GOXXED
11:49 AM <jecar> an exchange
11:49 AM <heaven> what
11:49 AM <jecar> guess which one im goxxing
11:49 AM <jecar> thats why prices are falling
11:49 AM → dzan joined ⇐ mpm quit
11:50 AM <Fate> you sound like shovel
11:50 AM <Fate> hi shovel
> We are in a thread asserting that it's "worth noting that this is entirely the U.S. not wanting peace."

In relation to the sanctions that were imposed as part of the U.S. pulling out of the nuclear deal despite Iran complying. But of course you left that part out.
It's been my experience that most of the time, you don't need "the fastest performance." You really only need things to be "fast enough." Though the dividing line between "too slow" and "fast enough" is pretty murky, it's obvious when you're firmly on one side or the other. In the article example, 24 hours is clearly too slow, while 10 minutes is clearly fast enough.

Consider, too, that expert-level knowledge of the sort a DB performance person will bring is often (rightly or wrongly) more expensive than that of a generalist. Maybe the expert can bring the runtimes down by a further factor of 100 (to 6 seconds), but, at that point, you have to seriously question whether it's worth it. They might be able to get another factor of 100 and get the runtime for a single analysis down to 6 seconds, but at that point, you have to start seriously questioning whether it would be worthwhile to do it. In the article's example, the analysis step could only be run twice in a week because it took 24 hours to execute (and, then, presumably the other 3 days of the week were spent doing something with the results). Since it might take a full day and a half of work to actually do anything with the results, getting the time to run an analysis down from 10 minutes to 6 seconds clearly isn't worth it. If it were me, I might have even stopped once I got the runtime down below an hour, because then it could be run over a lunch break or during a meeting or something.

I suppose my point is basically equivalent to Knuth's quip about premature optimization. In this particular example, there seems to be no reason to optimize further, because the system is probably 95% as useful as it can possibly get. Eliminating 47.8 hours of runtime per week lets you squeeze in one more run per week, but cutting that runtime down to 12 seconds per week (which is essentially 0) would seem to have a very small marginal gain.
Yeah, I don't mean to encourage removing features like that, I just suspect that most users don't mind or care and more importantly, I'm willing to sacrifice a lot for some good ole pure AOSP with an unlocked bootloader.
That's true. But I'm still a little bit underwhelmed by the raw horse power packed into NS, at least not as impressed as when N1 came out. Hummingbird may be the fastest on the market right now, but I'll probably bet on the next dual core 1.2 Ghz snapdragon phone for my next upgrade.
"How about the problem of, given a polynomial equation blah blah blah blah blah ..."
I was thinking about that, but what is the upper limit - in terms of monthly recurring users - you think for their free version?

I guess I am trying to balance the free cost, with the cost of switching 1 month after launch because I have exceeded capacity. Wouldn't it make more sense to just do that from day 1 ?

I am just simply thinking out loud, and would love to be corrected where I am wrong.
The article is advocating more government intervention in the economy, which is generally associated with left-wing political thought. I think that accusing this article of being left-wing is intellectually sound, though the GP's comment, and particularly the tone, did little to advance the conversation.

In fact, my central problem with this article was that ignored the fact that markets in the United States are generally less well-regulated than those in other industrialized nations. Many of the differences the author brings up can be traced back to that. The author clearly would like that changed, but it's a much bigger argument than the one the author is making. It can't be taken for granted that just because these regulations are desirable, and would make things better, then they should be enacted. The Overton window on government intervention in the economy in the US is different than in other industrialized nations, and that needed to be addressed in the author's argument.
Here's a few ways to market your Saas.

- create web visitors badges for your users to embed in their website. WOW work best!

- difficult pricing models for different groups of users, less than 200k visitors(free), paid versions for more than 200k visitors. targeted is easier to sell.

- do more videos on these themes; how to use it step by step guide? how this service bring in actual sales for your customers or you? need to see just by paying a few bucks, user is able to bing in hundreds or thousands for their businesses.

- paid version for another who does a review of your services on their blog, this won't hurt you now, there is no need to scale anything now.

- if you have no list, it's not likely that Campaignmonitor/Mailchimp will be any useful to you. even if you have a list, if it is not targeted, it's not useful too. current CTR is only at 0.3%, just imagine how many emails you need to convert emails to leads and then to sales.
That's interesting; I had no idea. How do they manage to make that illegal?
Anyone care to suggest some ideas on a few things:

a) who would likely buy these (corporates, SMEs, startups)?

b) it seems that they have increased the risk of single point of failure (e.g. 1 PSU taking down 128 nodes) what's the mitigation strategy?

c) what would an architecture on a box like this look like? Should I just be thinking of it as a cheap set of VPS nodes?

d) People keep mentioning the kind of processing these chips are good for and not so good for. Can someone be explicit about good real world uses and bad ones?
AFAIK, you could already do this (mini-DVI out and displayport).
Almost, but not quite.

Java (with eclipse) is actually better on windows, but for most of the other languages it is not.