jkeisling/hacker-news-corpus-2007-2022 huggingface dataset:
You're best bet is to probably contact the manufacturer. They will know which distributors they move product to.
There needs to be more detail for this to even be discussion-worthy.
Someone should implement make without the silly tabs.
Btw, your "Btw, JSON anyone?" link is broken:

{
"error": {
"msg": "undefined field: \"log\"",
"code": 400
}
}

Otherwise, great work! Looks very nice!
Using the scheme above, a password of "a" would result in a hash H('a' ^ x) where x is the first byte of the secret salt. The attacker can simply test all possible values of x (there are only 256) to determine the value of that byte. Knowing the first byte, the attacker can then look at a two-byte password and repeat the process to brute-force the second byte.

(It's also possible to brute-force more than one byte at a time; it would just take longer. For example if the shortest password the attacker can observe is 6 bytes then they would need to try 2^48 possibilities.)
Holy shit, they actually had a real Patriarchy: All the guys were in a secret conspiracy to keep the women down?
Sounds like someone read a bit of Jaron Lanier but never learned how to cite sources.
Actually it's more like a "second step" for make. You can use make to generate ninja files, and then ninja does the actual build. The idea is that make makes a lot of decisions that (usually) stay fairly stable as the files change gradually. Obviously CMake and various other build tools can also generate the .ninja files too.

e.g Make/CMake decides whether you're doing a debug or release build, and builds the appropriate ninja files. Ninja then doesn't have any decisions to make, other than purely what to build, which makes it fast.

It's used for Chrome/Chromium, and I believe the "no-op" build time is still under a second. If you then change a .cpp, it will only compile the absolute minimum, and calculation as to what to build is incredibly fast. make is considerably slower on the same set of files (so they say, not tested it personally, but the figures are around somewhere).

Probably only worth it for really big projects.
Humans usually cannot take books or a printed compilation of all the chess games in history, while computers have a database with a lot of chess games. If humans could take a whole library with them to the match, things would be different, but then, the reading/writing speed of a computer is much higher then the human reading/writing speed, so I think the comparison between human muscles and a gasoline engine is fair. Kasparov playing with no time limit and his whole library at hand would still be a match for any computer.
Sorry, in trying to be succinct, I came off as harsh.

I'm not questioning your motivations.

I just think that it is healthier to make statements like 'I want to help my child to realize their creativity' or 'I want to help my child realize their programming potential' than to say that 'I want to help my child to do X by Y years'.
Good work guys. Way to go! And all the best with it.
Sure, but is it worth learning TCL for a few edge-cases?
I like python, so I used "pexpect" in the past. I am sure other languages have such libraries too.

And if you are going for solid production, you probably want to re-implement "expect" anyway -- so all input is whitelisted and unexpected messages are flagged. You probably don't what to break your expensive 1990's industrial device because you were driving it with expect script, and it cheerfully ignored "WARNING RESERVE BATTERY DEAD, REPLACE BEFORE POWER OFF" messages.
This is already shown to be the case with FF, ABP uses a lot of memory per tab
Sure it may be a fractal of bad design, but it's unfair to say it has no productivity value. You can write plenty good PHP code that actually accomplishes things. (And this is coming from someone that hates PHP)
This so much.

I’ve been having such a hard time managing my symptoms because of burnout, and a long stretch of unemployment when I left my last job, and a determination to get a more healthy life set up that I haven’t been able to listen to music. I’m a musician, primarily for my own personal enjoyment, and I can’t even bear to hear a song. Because so many other things are jammed up in my brain.
Djangy got an interview and then after several days, a rejection letter. We're too similar to Heroku.

You know what? I'm not really that upset. They made a good decision from their point of view. But we have 200+ beta users, lots of positive feedback, and have a good product.

We don't need YC to tell us that. So just keep on truckin. Get users, iterate, and make YC regret rejecting you :-)
Which just speaks to the low quality of high school math questions, no an inherent flaw with providing access to technology. Try doing the same with the typical AMC problem…
>...it is the sense of the Senate of the United States of America that the operation of radio broadcast stations in the standard broadcast band (550 to 1600 kilocycles) with power in excess of 50 kilowatts is definitely against the public interest, in that such operation would tend to concentrate political, social, and economic power and influence in the hands of a very small group, and is against the public interest for the further reason that the operation of broadcast stations with power in excess of 50 kilowatts...
> The "1st cup of coffee" always takes the same amount of time in CPU-land. The 2nd-cup of coffee was speculatively made, but never "slowed down the first cup of coffee".

Just to be clear, then: the analogy from the original post doesn't apply.
I started at 170, and I'm 5'8 and mid-20s. Down to low 150s now, will probably stop around 130-140 which is closer to the bottom of the healthy range, and then go up to 17-800 calorie range.
Wait what now?

This is a real product, but marketed by Seinfeld's script writer?

I mean parts of the real product are what I want / build from sphinx spare parts - and I cannot work out now if those features are worthwhile or dumb.

I am very confused
I think the truism really is this:

In a micro sense: each company will try to reduce labor costs as much as possible, since costs are the enemy of profit.

But when we look at the macro situation then: employees are much of the demand curve. Less income means less demand.

This is the reason for much of the talk about UBI and job automation.
College Board also wants to make it difficult to copy down exam questions that could get reused. For this reason, calculators with QWERTY keyboards are banned. Evidently there is no problem with DVORAK, and nobody would ever learn to type quickly on an ABCDEF keyboard.
Then go to a track day? Or are you saying that the risk you enjoy feeling is that of whether or not you'll kill an innocent bystander and go to jail for vehicular homicide?
> One of the most infuriating things about Unity is they tend to deprecate/stop maintaining working things even though the replacement is still in preview and/or not ready.

A.k.a. life as a software engineer at Google.

I've found that this is just such a common experience, not just with Unity, but everywhere. I think the real problem with Unity is that it's hard to get good guidance about whether to choose the new/experimental path or the old/deprecated path. There are random packages (ProGrids? New input system?) that are marked experimental but ready for production use except the documentation is not as good as it should be. Then there's stuff like DOTS, which is much harder to use in production.

> Also, while I'm generally a fan of C#, I think it was somewhat of a poor choice for games.

This is more of an implementation quality issue than a language design problem. Unity was stuck on an old version of Mono for a long time, for a licensing reason or something like that. I'm aware that newer C# versions have much better GC performance, but it's not something I have personal experience with.
Extemely nice project. But from the looks of its Subreddit, not much is going on community-wise.
I dont believe in russian newspaper, this is just fiction. They make money on this kind of articles.
Just because there aren't as many known exploits for MT doesn't mean it's more secure than WP. That's the same argument used when people say Apple software is more secure than Microsoft software. Yet if Apple software was used by more than 90%+ of businesses, it's likely more people would attempt to (and possibly find ways to) hack it.

Security aside, MT has lots of issues -- performance (or lack thereof) being one of them and bad upgrades being another. After the third time an upgrade broke some sites I manage, I gave up and migrated some sites to WordPress and some to Drupal. Have yet to come across the same issue.
You seem to be getting confused about the relationship here.

Getting a payment from someone is very different to trying to get something for free from a company, or trying to get acquired.

I don't understand why everybody is emailing Steve Jobs all of a sudden, and I certainly wouldn't just start sending email to CEOs of companies.
Um, please elaborate on this
Facebook driving more traffic than google, no chance.

This article is pure linkbait.

If you think you survive without google traffic just block google bot in your robots.txt
I disagree. It can often mean what it says it means. But if body language is negative, don't count on a call back.
It's not startups vs big corporations. It's about the constraints on your ability to iterate.

You can't iterate on hardware the same way you do on software. If you're used to building the minimum possible thing that will work, shipping that, then gradually improving it day by day you are in for a rude awakening in the hardware business. You can't improve the hardware after it is out of your hands. All you can do is release a second piece of hardware that incorporates improvements. But you must charge all your customers over again, and not all of them will upgrade, and the whole process takes a lot of time and has a lot of friction.

You also can't iterate on a public API the way you do on an app. Once other folks have dependencies pointing to your API the cat is out of the bag. It is several orders of magnitude harder to deprecate an API than to release it. This is why, while iterating on software is good in general, you really don't have the option to reinvent your platform's basic copy-and-paste API too many times. It really pays to iterate internally until you get that right.
Though I agree with what Bruce is saying, I thought he did a very poor job of presenting his argument in a compelling way. Who would ever change their mind on this issue based on that example? There's got to be a better way to convey it.
It may applies to large corporation

More to the point it applies to Apple.

They have this brand image where everything is slick, tight, usable and so forth. It is "just right". To release (using Grubers example) half baked copy/paste would have appeased a few - but it wouldn't be the "Apple way".

That's not a bad thing; it doesn't make their products bad (and actually makes most products awesome!). More importantly it's their brand niche and they do it well. In fact they do it like no other.
Being a long term arch user this is very funny to me.

When open source developers make a rolling release it's a niche techie fetish but when CentOS does it suddenly it's "enterprise" it's wild what companies will pass off as "production ready" to managers.
Finally, after several months of struggling against the sunk-cost fallacy that forces you to spend more time working with auto-ordering than you would simply manually ordering detergent because this washing machine cost $700 more than the non-connected model, you concede defeat and return to ordering from your phone.
Most of the US would benefit from rezoning and a Highways Act-like deal to build stocks of affordable housing. Real estate investors and developers only seem to care to build relatively low-density 'luxury' housing, and fight affordable housing initiatives every step of the way. That seems to me like a market failure that could use some correction.
Does it matter if we're 8 years late?

Yes, yes it does. When you're relying on your mission crew to be at a particular life stage when you are ready to go. When they're suddenly 8 years later with families and commitments, it's going to be a whole different set of decisions.

That's assuming some of your dupes don't waste the best years of their lives waiting for you.
Yes, in theory. What a blessing it would be if cross-compatibility was always as simple as "recompile with this as the target."

That doesn't mean you can take Chromium for Windows and recompile targeting ARM and get something that works on jailbroken WinRT. As best as I can tell nobody has gotten Chromium running, but they have gotten many other x86 applications running.

People have already tried. There's more work than that involved.
Interesting paper, but for future reference, please post non-shortened links here. Thanks!
Thanks for suggesting coworking space. If I decide to burn off the rest of my debt via freelancing, that'll give me at least a shot of sanity.
Man vs Machine http://ngrams.googlelabs.com/graph?content=PC,+secretary&...
"computer" and "internet" reveal Y2K problem.
There's some info here about how the US concept of "city" clashes with the UK concept, which was used as the basis of some data naming decisions, and the effect it has on the US map.

http://compton.nu/2010/10/city-labels-in-openstreetmap/
Time for http://cvdazzle.com/
I think it's a bit smart to leave it out until the attention is on the next shiny thing and the prudes have moved on.
i'm surprised that "star wars" has never been able to eclipse "galoshes":

http://ngrams.googlelabs.com/graph?content=star+wars,+galosh...
I had posted the same link on HN yesterday but had wrongly added the title of "Why pride of being hacker is bad". Which i realized later so had to delete it.The real title should have been "Arrogance of being a Hacker"
For a classic example as to how this statement is completely wrong, I invite you to Google or Wikipedia "Prussian Blue".

Kids are (by design) impressionable and easily indoctrinated into any scheme.
I believe the cross-platform (so semi-native) PlasticSCM's included xmerge has what you're looking for:

http://codicesoftware.blogspot.com/2010/07/xmerge-to-merge-r...
"Joel Spolsky says that the ideal programmer is someone who is smart and gets things done. But what about people who are dumb and get things done?"

They are not ideal.
Speaking as the person who wrote the top answer to that my solution was this: I now work at Google. Problem solved.
I find myself wondering if this is getting upvoted by Haskell contrarians who aren't actually reading the article and noticing that it not about Haskell "being too mathematical", but not being out-of-the-box suitable as a really convenient ring theory explorer. I bet a lot of the upvoters would actually consider this a good sign rather than a bad one, on average....

There's still some room for Haskell syntax improvements. I've found the recent OverloadedStrings to be a big step forward, allowing you to directly use strings in places where it actually wants another type, removing a ton of useless and hard-to-factor-out code converting strings to ByteStrings, Text, and various other types that are there simply to label Strings as something more specific.

As dfrankes says, it is known the Prelude isn't perfect, but I'm not sure there's actually a perfect formulation regardless of what you do. Even if you could get all the mathematicians to agree completely about what all relevant mathematical entities are, something that is a lot harder than it sounds because it turns out a lot of them can have arbitrarily-chosen fiddly details when you really get down to it (how many set theories are there again?), you'll never bridge the gulf between a conventional programmer and any mathematician, and I think Haskell's promise as an interesting language lies rather more with the conventional programmer case than making mathematicians happy. (Not because the latter is bad, but because it is a sufficiently hard problem that trying to reconcile the needs of such a beast with something still useful is probably impossible.)
Reminds me of the note at the end of the perl man page:

"The three principal virtues of a programmer are Laziness, Impatience, and Hubris."

I'm not a Perl guy, but I love that quote.
The general idea was embodied in Ghostzilla and its successors, none of which I have actually used.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ghostzilla
Drink more. You'll gain weight.
Mostly sighted users on this app.. when will I be able to see for someone?
yes it would be different, it would be about how it was a record breaking cold year. If it rained unicorns it would be about it raining more unicorns than normal, but since we live in this universe instead of one of those alternate ones this story is about (yet another) record breaking hot year.
The article defines the super-rich as the top 1%. 300M * 1% = 3,000,000. The Forbes 400 is 400 out of the 3,000,000 super-rich, hardly a representative sample.

Instead I'd prefer to turn to studies of social class, such as Thompson & Hickey 2005 [1]. This study defines the upper-class as "largely constituted by the heirs to multi-generational fortunes".

[1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_class#Thompson_.26_Hicke...
"Lobby the websites you use to offer HTTPS browsing."

The irony is that codinghorror.com and stackoverflow.com (the two most prominent Jeff Atwood's web sites) do NOT support HTTPS.

https://www.codinghorror.com/ simply times out.
https://stackoverflow.com/ greets me with "The site's security certificate is not trusted!" and then further with Access Denied.
Is there dependency graph of mathematical fields somewhere? That would be useful.
Perhaps it's just bias, but i have real trouble taking any advice or getting news from somebody who goes by the pseudonym "Tyler Durden", or anybody who ends up getting published by said person.
Not that long ago, I read several quotes along these lines:

"We have plenty of openings, and we're getting 5 times as many resumes as before, but only half as many qualified applicants."

Most of the quotes were from people in medicine, IT, and similarly complex fields. The problem isn't a lack of "training" of the sort that could be covered by a community college course and a 3-month internship; the problem is a lack of "training" of the sort that comes through years of hard work and experience, combined with an entitlement mentality that says "the world owes me a job" instead of "I will develop skills that are useful to an employer, and therefore be able to get a job".

As you say, this is not a problem that will be solved by increasing funding.
I apologize for being so slow on my promise. I still struggle to make torrents.

Could someone please give this a try and report back if it's working:
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/599885/adams.mp4.torrent
"The 2014 iPhone 6 was “the poster child” of this transformation, according to a person involved in the product’s development. While the device had complex internal components and a larger screen, it dropped the diamond-polished edges and the precisely cut glass parts of the back of the iPhone 5 and 5s, which had been difficult to produce."

well, that explains why the iPhone went from such a unique design to generic plastic android. Glad the 5-esque design is back for the 12 series at least.
I think you're overstating how people generally feel about Zuckerberg's influence. He clearly has the most power to wield, but I think most understand the nuance that he's limited by tons of competing interests.

I think that part of the problem is that he's trying to appease people who will never be satisfied, who want to control speech and eliminate wrongthink. In doing so, he's creating enemies out of people who don't ask for much, just that the banhammer not be wielded so liberally.
> But methodology should be independent of being able and willing to ask questions.

What if asking questions significantly increases quality and productivity? I mean, strictly speaking, Agile is no methodology but more a set of values [1], that defines a culture rather than a methodology. Yes, there are agile methodologies (Scrum, XP, etc.), but those are worthless without the right culture.

In fact, I think you are better off with the waterfall methods, if your company has no ambitions of changing the culture. So the correct combination of culture and methodology is critical.

[1] https://agilemanifesto.org/
I don’t. I’m using Nix containers.
Here we arrive at the concept of negative and positive rights. You don't have to consent to be subject to laws that bar you from interfering with others. You should have to consent before being forced to provide others with goods and services on the benefit of your labour.
Two people working full time on Python have two names.

The equivalent of two full time employees could be 10 people with 20% of their time. I suspect there are a lot of patches submitted to python that were developed by someone being paid while they did the work that isn’t accounted for in the 1 actual full-time plus 5 20% time people.

IOW, paying for 1 additional named person to work ~2000 hours in 2021 will almost surely not be a net increase of 50% of capacity.
Does Google even use Python 3? I thought they were moving things from Python 2 to Go. (And Chromium build and debug scripts still use Python 2 AFAIK.)
The parent presented nothing other than hyperbole. What argument would convince them? Should I point to all the libraries that still stand? Even if the internet as a whole disappeared (not just their preferred platforms) we'd be in a better position re: access to speech and publishing than we have been for most of history. Hyperbolic claims like the parent's don't deserve an argument, they deserve to be laughed at.

Besides, this whole thread once again misunderstands "free speech" as some absolute natural law. But even at the founding of the country the authors of the 1st Amendment viewed it as a restraint on the federal government and no one else. Including state governments, much less private actors.
Well, the only thing missing from that solution is the eject key, but considering you thought a Matias tactile pro was decent enough I am not really sure if that mattered to you, as that one replaces f19 with the eject key I thought it was a compromise you were willing to make.

What I am saying is a Mac layout can be recreated with stickers and software. It is not like a Mac keyboard sends magic signals to your computer. It is a regular USB keyboard without the context key and 4 extra FN keys.
A lot of "data science" code in non-software companies.
Presumably RenlyCoin has less value than its brother, StannisCoin?
I can't imagine the amount of effort is relevant if it's your final act. What would you be saving your energy for?
IMO, a port to a browser or mobile app makes a lot of sense.
> new hires start as a T3

This makes me curious about what T1 and T2 would mean.
What is the cache line size and page table size in M1?

sysconf(_SC_PAGESIZE); /* posix */

Can you get direct processor information like LEVEL1_ICACHE_ASSOC and LEVEL1_ICACHE_LINESIZE from the M1??
I’m 31 and think it’s a cute/fun idea that I’ll probably never want myself, but nobody is forcing me to use it.

It’s okay to let people build, deliver, and market things that you don’t need/want. People are allowed to like things that you yourself do not like.

Reading the other replies to this comment I feel I am about to be downvoted to hell lol
I believe you are right, and that the Childs paper actually beautifully quantifies your suspicion: they appear to show that the speedup of the quantum algorithm disappears if 'R > sqrt(2)', which intuitively means that the problem is 'too' non-linear. (I would expect that truly chaotic systems fall into this category.) This negative result does not seem to be mentioned in the quanta article.
Being a developer with an MBA is a rare combination ;) Worth it, from my experience.
Such as the state department data off JWICS, which he also copied and intended to publish through wikileaks?