jkeisling/hacker-news-corpus-2007-2022 huggingface dataset:
Thanks! Its always great to hear that kind of thing. :-)

I think I can speak for Jason when I say that we're always looking to expand our offering but we want to do it smartly and in a customer-driven way. You can certainly use our service to make english-language documents but for us a big part of 'localization' is really sweating the details and understanding customer needs. So far, that has meant a focused product for Japanese businesses. The Japanese business consumer is somewhat conservative in adopting new process and has high expectations for services so it's important for us to do things right.

But yeah, like most startups we're always working on new things... :-)
This sucks. Why? Because having e.g. "Adaptive Multimedia Streaming" in the Pro version might mean that you won't get it in the open version since the professional product would lose it's edge. I would much rather see a model where features from the professional edition propagate to the open one after authors earn enough from subscriptions.
Not necessarily - for instance there may be requirements for physical access, data protection, actually working in the same office as a team member, etc.
It says pkgsrc. Do you consider that proper?
I have been using python for some years now (although I'm no Guru..) and have almost always been able to debug using PDB or a python IDE.
I'm not sure how this helps debugging?
Is it debugging through some type of logging?
I haven't checked out the source code yet, and the site is fairly brief on actual use-cases.
Thanks for any feedback.
Because minified code functions differently from non-minified code. It helps to detect bugs caused by minification. There's also a general principle which states that the application shouldn't be developed in a "debug" mode, because the debug mode might cause the application to execute differently from production.
What fundamental property of ads makes them different from content?

Maybe ads are a type of content.

http://www.baekdal.com/publishing/why-traditional-ads-work-a...
What makes you think people don't want to comment on ads? People are happy to talk about ads IRL.
Robin Hanson has about worn this subject out. Education is about social signaling. It became institutionalized when labor began to have surpluses.

For social signaling goods, the cost is the point.
Shapiro's name is on about seven different CRDT papers :) it makes citations difficult for the Wikipedia article. Personal opinion, this[0] 2011 paper is probably the best one to read, where Shapiro's and Baquero's teams finally joined forces and put out a good comprehensive paper on the subject. The one you linked focuses a bit too heavily on TreeDoc in lieu of good treatment of CRDT theory. Their survey of known CRDTs[1] is also worth reading.

[0] https://hal.inria.fr/file/index/docid/609399/filename/RR-768...

[1] https://hal.inria.fr/inria-00555588/document
To quote from the article: "As we see it, theoretical physics risks becoming a no-man's-land between mathematics, physics and philosophy that does not truly meet the requirements of any."

What I think you're suggesting is a philosophical benefit. Which echoing another comment of mine, probably shouldn't get funded by the NSF (the US National Science Foundation, one of the parts of the US Federal government who's remit includes funding theoretical physics).
Over 90% of the funding comes from NASA, NASA also supplied most of the hardware for the station even for the EU, Russian and Japanese modules, there isn't a single part of the station that didn't have at least 50% US contribution to it, with the average contribution summing to about 75% of the station's construction.
And I've never seen US media treat the ISS as a US project, also while ninth graders might not know astronauts by name these days (mostly because the media stopped covering every single launch and mission as they did in the Gemini, Apollo and early shuttle days) i some doubt it that even 6th graders don't know that there are American astronauts pretty much every day up there...
Eh, it was clear to me what the headline meant.
Even if you wouldn't mind, there is your neighbor who would've. Should someone then put him in prison for having another opinion?
Perhaps he was shocked in to studying the situation further after being surprised by his credit drying up. Other people saw that coming. https://mobile.twitter.com/patio11/status/124135212329342156...
Seems to be a thing of electron, VS code cannot do this either (and the proper handling of multiple monitors in general).
> have given the reasons that I believe 1/5 is in no way overestimate

No. You have not.
Virtue is what you do in silence
> No, you just made a large number of flaws in your initial analysis

Seeing as you don't have access to my analysis, you can't say that.

> You're producing a future estimate, assuming that all properties of your dataset are consistent (they aren't) and will continue to hold (they won't).

This is just vague stuff to put me down. I worked by confirmed cases in publicly available data.

> varying ratio of confirmed cases to actual total

I'm not sure what this mean but I went by the total confirmed cases, day by day. As for your 'increased testing', I'm fully aware the US is finally getting going.

> varying time offset according to disease progression and symptoms presentation (aka testing).

Why would the progress at different rates at different times in different individuals make any difference? I'm going by confirmed cases anyways so unless you know of a new strain with different characteristics that's starting to distort the figures (and there are possibly 2) then it makes no difference.

No, save your slapdowns for the people who push garlic as treatment. You are objecting to me for psychological reasons, not logical ones. You can go to the wiki page and see the growth day by day but you don't want to because it's bad news and you don't like that. Well, get used to it. Your life is going to change, nothing will stop that and the sooner you face it the safer you and your country will be. Hard times ahead. Good luck.
It’s a crisis. This kind of thinking is what led the FDA to delay coronavirus testing authorization in the US by a couple months.

Any set of regulations needs a crisis mode.
Did you find a copy with well formatted diagrams?
Of course we should thank @paulg for this, but it also highlights the need to tax fairly so that the State can adequately provide for the health of all of its people.
It happened enough that he had a business arrangement with the National Enquirer to pay for and kill the stories. Also “Stormy Daniels”.

The genius of Trump is that he’s able to normalize it. He had scandals every week that would take down most people.
Why don’t you use an AdBlocker?
I still don't understand why the blame would be any different if something goes wrong with a dating app (as in the Netherlands) versus something going wrong with virtual events that also aren't held in the app, but require the use of Apple Pay, versus physical goods, which don't require Apple Pay.

I think most customers are happy to assign blame to Apple regardless, since the app went through Apple's hand curated App Store. That may be illogical in the case of physical goods, but I've seen people assign blame for far less. It's also still illogical in the case of virtual events, even though those use Apple's IAP system and 30% cut now.
Yes, but the whole point is that you don't have to update all your dependencies at once.

Even if you do find yourself needing to update your dependencies, you can do them 1 at a time. This way you aren't stuck with a not building, completely broken codebase for days while you refactor to adapt to new changes.
Billons in profit? Based on music subs?
https://unusualwhales.com/ and just following trending on specific targets. Enormous amounts of reading. Basically, if the popular media is hyping something, I go contrarian or least start thinking that way. There's nothing wrong with coming in late or leaving late on something. Go into investing with a realistic set of expectations and goals and you'll do fine. Occasionally, you'll screw up (I missed an options spread that someone else nailed me on and lost $7k in potential profits just a couple months ago).

The best thing is just to go with indexes and spread buys over time (daily if you can) and sell only when you want money to spend, not because you're scared of the market.

No one beats the market... I just try to find the flow and go with it.
Well I ask because I was prescribed Levaquin for sinus infection about 10 years ago, and read the warnings about fluoroquinalones with tendon degradation, so quit after one pill, and saline rinsed extensiely, which eventually worked.

I've rolled my ankle and had multple achiles strains since, which I'd never known before. Of course, one pill is not much dose.

Thanks for discussing.
Author is saying that the state is where opportunity is best found at the moment due to all the reasons laid out in the article, which is quite good. It’s not a value judgement, just an observation.
>Actually, when they say that behavioral traits are heritable, are they saying that these genes are identified or is it just statistics?

Typically it's just statistics (usually based on twin studies). In the last few years we have started doing large Genome-Wide Association Studies (with sample sizes of over a million in some cases) which are a first step toward identifying the relevant genes.

But there are still many limitations: GWAS typically use SNP arrays which only measure specific points in the genome instead of sequencing the whole thing (because it's much cheaper). The SNPs identified may not be causal themselves but simply correlated with the causal gene.
And when there is no personal action in favor of a thing, consider how difficult it will be to pass legislation in favor of that thing?

Imagine if all EVs, all good hybrid cars (e.g. Toyota), all vegetarianism for environmental reasons, rooftop solar, and all other "individual actions" were eliminated and carbon emissions doubled, and nobody seemingly cared about climate change. Just imagine how much harder it would be to get a carbon tax. The timeline would go from someday to never.

Just as a general statement, some of the people who tell you "oh no, don't engage in individual action!" aren't actually supportive of the legislative approaches they suggest. They are scared that people taking a visible, meaningful personal stand against something will move the needle in favor of changes they oppose, in ways that online statements can't. Not everyone for sure, but those people are there, pretending to be allies.

I've lived in 2 places with persistent (~365 days per year) bad air pollution (France and Taiwan), and 1 place with seasonal air pollution, and the idea of not taking individual action to protect myself is just stupid. I support legislative approaches where sensible (or even possible), but:

> Meanwhile, you can get air filters, respirators, etc. which work today
I honestly thought I wrote this as I was reading.
I’ve had the exact same bad experiences, essentially everytime I tried it. First time being the one that started it all where I accidentally ate two full brownies. That scarred me. Second time I almost lost all motor skills for a few minutes. The last time it happened I decided to change the experience when I felt it start. This time, instead of fighting it, I just let go and basically tricked myself into enjoying it and boy was it great. I know the feeling of a bad experience, but tell your mind to take in it and you’ll enjoy it; worked for me at least.
It's too bad, because much nicer calculators can be made now, e.g. https://www.swissmicros.com/dm42.php
I definitely agree. I was thinking this the other day when thinking about how 'white' must have felt like 'paper' back in the day. Also, the issue WRT dark not really being dark.

You're right that without LCDs , especially OLED, dark mode wouldn't really be a thing.
America's GDP was still significantly larger than Japan's even during the 1980s:

https://www.visualcapitalist.com/2000-years-economic-history...

From about 1900 to 2015 America was totally dominant. It's only in the last few years that China has overtaken us.
Floating point numbers are inadequate to manipulate accounts representing currency, and for finance at a large.

https://stackoverflow.com/questions/3730019/why-not-use-doub...
As others have mentioned, this post is about Shopify apps, not Shopify stores. I'd recommend doing a bit more research before deciding to boycott a company. They're absolutely not taking a 20% cut from sales of physical goods, this isn't Uber Eats.
This product would make more sense if they defined "consumer" as "engineer-inclined consumer". Swapping parts will drive the everyday consumer away from this product.
This doesn’t sound right. I know we evaluated linode vs do in 2016, and dropped linode because of lack of volume support. Digitalocean had that, even if only in FRA1, but it surely was ahead of linode back then

(Not sure if block storage came even earlier to other DO data centers, but as those were outside the EU they wouldn’t have been relevant)
25% revenue growth past 2 years and losses have remained constant.

If this wasn't hard tech, I would be worried, but this is hard capital intensive stuff and looks to me like they are doing fine.

If in 10 years there ends up being 1 independent cloud company, that would be a pretty amazing business. DO has a good a shot as any (only thing I can think off is AWS spins out). DO is so good that there I can't think of a worst case scenario being anything other than one of the big 3 buys them. Best case is the moon.
Thanks, Mike!
It looks like the expansion cards are just USB-C adapters that fit inside the case. If so, it should be pretty simple to make a compatible expansion card. Or just plug in any dongle you like, ignoring the form factor.
>I think this proves that Apple was right to dump legacy ports.

How it proves it? Those guys do not drop ports, they just make them modular.

All the "saved space" in Apple laptops become amazingly wasted space in your bag with tons of adapters and wires.

I still dream to meet the one who made such 'wise' decision to tell him what I think about it personally!

>USB-C, and the correct cables, are all anyone needs.

I am not sure you can know what anyone needs. For instance you do not know what I need.

I wish you'll be around when I need to copy my files from the camera with idiotic dongle in the field when time is precious.

I would love then to hear how sticking card directly into the slot without any headache is less comfortable than looking for some dongle in the bag while holding your camera equipment and then hanging dongle on it's wire because there is no table around to put your laptop on or put it somehow on your lap and try not to move to avoid it breaking during the transfer because then you'll have to start again transferring your important pictures. Then pray it will work
because some times it will not when you need it most.

Removing sd-card reader slot is example of the most idiotic design decision I can imagine. It is taking what works perfectly and destroying it for no reason at all. It is pure damage without any benefits taking size of it into account.

It was done by people who never used laptop for transferring photos from the camera using sd-card.

They never thought that while you transfer with the sd-card your other card is available to continue shooting in critical or unexpected situations. This is what makes the difference between making some shots and not! I would never understand this idiocy of removing sd-card slot to "save space".

The whole point of laptop is to save YOU space and headache or space in your BAG! Not in the laptop itself by making it useless. Such a dumb decision to remove useful ports. Goodness.
Which is hilarious, because talking during a shift is frowned upon even if it doesn't impact productivity. And if it does? Expect a call within the day
Check out https://github.com/utmapp/UTM/tree/master/patches
Mm. That's an interesting way of looking at it. But the assumptions are laid out by Feynman: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QRE0GxT6Zbw&list=PLgRI7D_FXE...

Although I'd love to urge everyone to sit through all six hours, I recognize this isn't too practical. So -- with apologies to Feynman -- I'll have to do a poor job of translating:

- The scientific method means that we are never certain we're right; we're only certain we're wrong. But (as with Newton's laws) it's pretty incredible we can last so long before we're proven incorrect!

- The world seems to obey mathematics. But math != physics. One helps the other; discoveries in math have applied to physics, and vice-versa.

- The heart of nature seems to be a purely mathematical construct, from which there is no escape. Many people have tried to model gravity as something other than the gravitational equation, e.g. suppose at every point in time there are particles shooting every direction simultaneously. Then gravity is merely us blocking these particles -- earth with respect to the sun blocks a certain fraction of particles towards the sun, and in fact inversely as the square of the distance. No math necessary! Unfortunately, doesn't quite work -- if it were true, the earth would have slowed in its orbit due to blocking the particles, and it wouldn't have lasted ~billions of years. So that's the end of that theory.

- The double slit experiment seems to prove that the world has no other model other than probabilistic (see lecture 6). There is some fundamental limitation preventing us from narrowing down nature further than this threshold.

- Every test designed to break this assumption has failed.

Therefore, I say that the physical world is probabilistic, and I will wager any sum of money you'd like to bet that it will still be true within, say, 200 years.

There is one interesting alternative: if everything in the universe is pre-destined. The complete absence of any kind of free will whatsoever. Every atom, every electron, every single subatomic particle, all predestined from the moment of the big bang til now. That seems to be the only way that it can't be probabilistic.
There is nothing propagandistic about this site. The OP, Zaurun Fikirləri, is either a Turk or Azerbaijani who is clearly triggered by the content of the article.
It wasn't always like that, and I am sure it isn't at the same level as nasm/yasm/masm/tasm.
Everything is written from Armenian perspective. That doesn't raise red flags for you?
Again with the "why don't you just..."

It doesn't work. A few people choosing to go vegetarian or vegan changes nothing. Something like 80% of people who try it revert to meat within a year. It's the same with people choosing to stop driving. If you try it you'll just notice nobody else gives a shit and you're making this huge sacrifice while they continue to have fun. Anything like this can only work if we all do it together.
I pretty much fully agree. I started noticing about five years ago that some people I knew for years were sometimes writing and talking in a way that was essentially gibberish to me. Now it has spread and become sort of what you describe even with old friends. I sometimes cannot even just state what I see with my own eyes without triggering the madness. It's like a decentralized psychological breakdown which I am witnessing from abroad. My phrase "half of the US" was a bit tongue and cheek. Pick your half. [Edit: just to engage the point about religion. It now seems to me that national politics in America is a religion. And maybe this was always and must be the case---if you read the founding documents and follow the early development. What is happening now looks like a potential schism. Staring at the other person and not understanding the words is what a schism looks like. No longer in communion.]
No mistakes are made, however.

Repeat something often enough, and one wil be able to do it with perfection without any mistake.

A concert pianist is also able to perform for hours without mistake, and he would easily do so blindfolded, simply because he has done it a thousand times.
Wouldn't that just effectively hand lobbying power to the huge corporations? How would that change anything?
Yeah but if it doesn't use Node.js and Clojure and NoSQL it will fail.
I suspected as much, but thank you for finding and posting the link.
I simply don't believe that, choice always exists whether or not an individual is aware of it. They can choose otherwise, regardless of whether they do or not, nothing is stopping them. If you have actual scientific evidence to the contrary, I'd love to see it.

> Just because some INTPs slip through the cracks does not mean that your typical ESFJ has a choice.

Yes it does, they just didn't assert it.
This is a similar fear that I discussed in the thread of my post on "Where to find a good hacker?" http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2033726

I am not a programmer (as of now), and as I explore how to execute an idea, I am reluctant to share a full-scale plan and specs of the site I wish to create. Hence, the ambiguity in my original post.

I would love to share a detailed plan of my idea with the community, to garnish feedback and establish credibility. However, there is nothing to stop someone from taking the plan that I have spent hours developing (which I consider intellectual property, equal to the actual programming), and improving upon the idea and writing the actual code to make it happen. I understand that "ideas" are merely just that, and that executing an idea is where it counts.

How much disclosure can you provide about a project to solicit feedback, without having your idea "borrowed" for development?
There is a broad line between what you describe, and how Torvalds was acting in that thread.
Almost as a rule, studies with "science" in the name are not true sciences.
If that’s not it, it should be.
There's already the Do Not Track header, which is supposed to serve exactly this purpose. Its problem is it has no teeth.

https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Headers/DN...
Well, with all the nationalism I guess they WANT an intranet. And I think they can probably pull it off. The Chinese Intranet is pretty good actually & there's a lot of pride in using home-grown services and hardware, just count the XiaoMi phones next time you're in the subway. (Brilliant brand name BTW)
I don't think that's the primary issue. I think there's a large number of people who feel like the rules that everyone plays by are harder than the rules the rich play by. For example, the negative opinion many have of the lower tax rate for capital gains vs payroll taxes. It's not that those who pay capital gains tax are dishonest. It's that it's unfair that their earnings are taxed at a lower rate.

Other examples might be CEO pay vs average pay; the shrinking middle class; etc.. These create a feeling that while the rich grow richer, things get harder for the middle class... and add to this sense of unfairness. Since it's unfair if a company is improving it's earnings/productivity/etc, but most of those gains go to the CEO (since that increase is the result of everyones input).

From that angle, this really has nothing to do with greed.

If it were to come to light that some rich person also earned their money dishonestly.. that seems to create anger that's directed toward that person/group.. see the anger people had over the bank bailouts... that didn't grow into an anti-rich campaign.