jkeisling/hacker-news-corpus-2007-2022 huggingface dataset:
That sounds like a quality sales team. Things like the OP tend to happen when you take inexperienced and desperate sales people and make them work on straight commission with no mentorship. Exactly as the person you spoke to feared, this has tarnished the reputation of the entire Canoical organization, which is exactly why you don't do that.
I think the key point here is that ML is *automated* inference.

In the sciences "inference to a model" is a process, not a dataset, called experimentation. The scientific method is the sequencing of relevant datasets, each of the latter "ruling out or in" the former.

There are many issues with ML systems, fundamentally, that the "automation" involved is not an automation of science (/"learning proper") -- but the automation of function aproximation.

A fatal issue is then that the datasets we are asking to be automatically aproximated are radically incomplete, and there is no "scientific method" within the ML system to appeal to.

Eg., we are trying to get self-driving cars with devices (cars) which cannot estimate the intentions (mental states) of pedestrians (ie., a missing variable within the PD but not in X). And very profoundly, have even no means to acquire this data, or to temper their "decisions" via being aware of its absense.
I wonder if the old man can get his expenses reimbursed by neighbor donations.
I guess it's been somewhere in their backlog with "impact: medium, urgency: low" for ages, so it never got to the top of the list and never got done.

I'm also quite sure it's got updated to "urgency: high" today
Have any referrals? looking for a cto
I'm constrained by my ability to learn and that is pretty much it.

Well, I think it is more subtle than that. You are relying on certain externalities - for example, you can't build a chip fab without spending an enormous amount of money, and you need all that power so you can work in Python and not ASM, you can't lay ubiquitous bandwidth without spending an enormous amount of money, etc.

What you are doing is equivalent to your friend creating whatever she can imagine in MicroStation (or whatever CAD architects use these days). It's just that she seems to be more aware of the commercial aspects of actually making it happen than you are.
"we won't know who wasted 100mm until its over"

word
Dont forget to factor in the welfare and pension differences between EU and USA. I Work in Norway and people in our wider group in the USA get about 20% more salary and a much much cheaper cost of living. That said, I get real universal healthcare, excellent working conditions and employee rights, a state pension and a company pension and good working hours. Dont be too worried about getting paid less in Europe.
> Name one service during the dot-com era with anything approaching that number.

200M site users in 1999? Are you serious? Was there even a total of 200M online in US for all the sites combined at that time? I doubt it. If you judge by that you'd have to scale it accordingly somehow.
Why did I get a -1 vote for this? It truly happened. It told me to install WP when I clicked the link.
Quite a few quote the circumstances under which meat is 'produced' as another primary reason, i.e. not the killing of animals for food per se, but the conditions created by the industrialized process optimized for efficiency in killing.
The last thing that AGI needs is more philosophical thinking. Philosophy and the Turing Test have done enough damage to the field.

Philosophers can not seem to comprehend how a mass of meat can create consciousness and take leaps to try to rule out the mass of meat, regardless of the fact that they all know that when bad things happen to said mass of meat bad things also happen to said consciousness.

The Turing Test could not have been a more wrong direction to define AGI. Looking like something does not make you that thing, and it did not at all address capability, just the appearance of capability.

Insight into intelligence will come slowly, and it will come from examining, categorizing, and eventually understanding the internal workings of the human brain.
I think there are multiple hypothesized reasons, but I haven't seen any numerical figures so it's hard to confirm how impactful each is:

- Anime production committees (https://blog.sakugabooru.com/2017/05/02/what-is-an-animes-pr...) take a large portion of the profit from a show, and studios often see very little (they're often not on the production committees).

- If the studio doesn't own the IP, they'll likely have to pay a hefty amount for it.

- There's not much actual revenue from anime: historically studios have tried to monetize via extraordinarily expensive DVDs of the episodes (such that only die-hard fans would buy them), and merchandise, but apparently the studios don't even get all of the revenue from these sources. Streaming is becoming more popular but I'm not sure how much revenue Crunchyroll/Netflix/etc. shares with the studios.

- Anime is often seen as an advertisement for the original source material (usually manga), so there's less incentive for certain parties on the production committee to monetize.
Okay, let's just strike the "otherwise objectionable" at the end of (c)(2)(A):

What cause of action do you imagine you'd have that wouldn't be barred by 1A?
...which is why nobody speeds.
You want a cite for the Reagan and GW Bush presidencies' defining policy initiatives?
And the Cells in the blade probably have all 8 SPUs enabled.
Because expiring passwords is a horrible idea.

At the place I work at, most everyone just changes their password monthly like: "password1", "password2", etc.. Anything more difficult than that then they are likely to forget their password.

Another awful idea is locking people out if the password is wrong after 3 attempts. Then you have mischievous characters entering in 3 bogus passwords just to lock you out of your account and inconvenience you.

The whole concept of expiring passwords should be gotten rid of everywhere.
lastpass.com does sync passwords across computers and devices.
The failures of an individual don't really have much bearing on whether the individual's moral beliefs are right.

If you assume they're failures, they don't have much bearing. If, however, you assume that people's actions reflect their beliefs more closely than their arguments do, the fact of hypocrisy regarding a given belief suggests rather strongly that even the person making the argument doesn't believe it. When an argument's proponents don't even believe it, I think it's reasonably strong evidence that it isn't true.
Might not be that much of an exaggeration, though. The AF probably uses it to simulate things like airframes and nuclear explosions; those are embarrassingly parallel, so you'll get full use of all the cores. At 8 cores per box [1], that gets you up to 14k times faster, if the cores are the same speed as that laptop.

[1] The Cell has one PowerPC core and 8 SPUs; but the PS3 is shipped with one SPU disabled, so they can get the yield up.
It's the colons that do it, in my opinion. They visually fill the gaps between segments, which makes it harder to pick out what is a digit and what is "empty space". Compare:

6d08:048c:4c3b:57f0:0bca:f236:e8ab:b52e

with

6d08-048c-4c3b-57f0-0bca-f236-e8ab-b52e

Though the best solution is to fully embrace the ASCII lifestyle that modern teletypes allow, and use the record separator 0x1f:

6d08 048c 4c3b 57f0 0bca f236 e8ab b52e
> This is literally how the internet has worked forever.

I don't know what specific fallacy is this, but stating that how it always worked does not mean it should have worked that way or that it should never change.

Twitch would not exists without content creators. Neither would exist without the other.

In that relationship Twitch has the last word on everything.

I would argue that it shouldn't be this way or at least not this one sided. Content creators should have a say on Twitch's decisions.
You can store packages, cache images, and freeze versions of things like Packer/tf.
Should be easy to check by comparing applications for immigration.
It started as that at Google and was a nightmare in the long run. People would sneak in dependencies on non-hermetic or non-reproducible behavior all the time. The classic "this just needs to work, screw it I'm pulling in this library to make it happen" problem. It just kept getting more and more complex to detect and stop those kinds of issues. Hence a new language with no ability to skirt around its hermetic and non-turing nature.
You'll see a wireguard network interface on all the connected devices, and you can configure some private address subnet on it, like 192.168.1.0/24 and give the devices some addresses from this range.

Then you can just talk between any of the devices via this subnet. Wireguard will securely tunnel the traffic.

https://www.wireguard.com/

DNAT is just a concept https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Network_address_translation

You can set it up using iptables or nftables.

You don't need to use nginx, use http reverse proxy you know.
I'll believe it when Texas executes one.
Why don't they just give all players the same official rackets before the match? Problem solved :)
I’m really not sure what you’re saying. Are you suggesting websites shouldn’t be able to moderate itself?
At its essence, in the modern understanding, a force is an emergent phenomena arising out of the fact that a world (a spacetime filled with your particles) where two particles of opposite charge seem to move towards each other is more probable than a world where they don't.

This sounds silly but it's exactly the root cause in the current understanding and shoehorning in the word "force" in "force-carrying particles" is a stretch and causes this confusion. It's true that there would be no electromagnetic force without the photons. But photons and their likes are not the only way a "force" arises. For example, the Pauli exclusion principle can be seen as a "force" and it arises without photons with just electrons.
I've seen a couple of references to the fact that Erlang does, in fact, run on Android, including one here on HN: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1518686 and the download page :) http://www.burbas.se/artiklar/erlang-for-the-android-plattfo... and https://github.com/downloads/esl/otp/Erlang.apk
Ouch! Well, that's some good information for me to digest. It's clear that security is the major issue here. I'm looking into PGP and how to effectively do it for individual users.
Really cool! Thank you for your generosity! Nice Skills!
I totally agree. Facebook has become a bad place to flirt. Who wants to share pictures of their grandma with their latest crush? This has the potential of becoming the standard for dating.
How can I put it on my glasses?
Perhaps something to access and update your data remotely, such as office documents, bookmarks, photos, etc. You could probably even do high latency chat.
That's the point: raise the bar by forcing the new users to hang around and get a feel for the culture before submitting. On top of that, acquiring 200 karma points on HN definitely doesn't fall into the "extremely difficult" category.
The traffic itself is temporary, but the random backlinks the site got from the brief awareness should be good for seo. When I submitted my now-defunct expired domain name related site and got a similar treatment, it pushed me nearly to the top for the term "expired domain names" on Google.
Looking for full-time new grad (May 22) low level developer in networking/security or observability role. I am open to remote positions.

Location: Manhattan,KS
Remote: Yes
Willing to relocate: Yes
Technologies and Skills: Rust, C, Go, Python, ElasticSearch/OpenSearch, Ansible, System Administration, Cyber Security, Incident Responding, Automation.

Résumé/CV: https://aljaroudi.net/resume.pdf
Email: moheeb@aljaroudi.net
Adam Smith had recognised that in “Wealth of Nations”.

He goes on to conclude that “the mercantile system” allows the “merchants and manufacturers” to pervert legislation towards their “sole end and purpose” – production for profit – and away from the legitimate “sole end and purpose” of production – to satisfy human needs.

He also points out that the interests of these manufacturers, have been “peculiarly attended to” by the government.
For $900 can’t they just buy the required tool to open/break it? Sounds like a waste of money otherwise.
Prison, it's Onur's stalker.
> Why aren't their views as legit as yours or mine?

Could it not be argued that the legitimacy of views depends on how much information the person has access to? The average working-class person, due to lack of free time and interest may be unable to acquire more information than is conveniently delivered to them through a handful of sources, and if those sources are controlled by certain actors and not balanced by other sources, then that would appear to place a limitation on how informed their views might be.

Some influential 19th-century traditions of working-class radicalism heavily emphasized learning for the sake of it, but I am not sure that conditions today are conducive to that.
IP enforcement was one provision among many. No deal is perfect.
Yeah it absolutely 100% can get worse.

The Cambodian killing fields were less than 50 years ago. The Rwandan genocide was only 25 years ago. The Rohingya genocide was less than 3 years ago.

"Us vs Them" is a dangerous game.
Usually, in that situation, either you have family or friends who can help you or you end up homeless.
But the industrial value of gold only accounts for a fraction of its price. The recent gold bubble/run-up shows that pretty clearly (the price changed much quicker and independent of its potential industrial uses). So the fact that gold has traditional and industrial uses doesn't really help to justify its "value" or its current price (especially when price is far above industrial demand).

Its true that bitcoin doesn't have an underlying value as an industrial metal (obviously). But it does have an underlying value, primarily that it is distributed/un-seizable e-cash. This differentiates it from previous e-currency systems maintained by a central authority: paypal.com, libertyreserve.com, e-gold.com, notice these are all tied to an authoritative domain name, whereas bitcoin is not.

The intrinsic property of being decentralized/p2p, enables the notable use-value of purchasing controlled substances from the tor hidden node Silk Road. There is no other way to purchase items from that market. This sort of use-value is comparable to the use-value we could assign to something like Facebook: that there is no other way to view the original content which others have posted there. Or to USD since there is no other way to pay taxes.

I think it'd help your argument if you compared bitcoin to other virtual economies/currencies (facebook or facebook credits, paypal, eBay etc). Its obvious that bitcoin is not like gold and won't be valued for the exact same reasons. But see if you can come up with unique reasons why facebook and paypal (note that shares in neither company pay dividends) should have value whereas bitcoin should not.
any chance you would consider mentoring remotely?
That aggregation you mention is traditionally called the "planet", and has a long history:

http://planet.lisp.org/

http://planet.emacsen.org/

http://www.planetnetbeans.org/

http://planetopendata.herokuapp.com/opendatanews?style=hacke...

There are probably several packages which will ease the creation of such a thing, but this is the one I know of: http://www.planetplanet.org/
Or people could just stop working at those places and choose to work at places that have reasonable working hours. I know I won't work overtime without getting 1.5x pay.
> Welcome to white collar america programmers.

Nope. At least in white collar America professionals demand fair compensation for intense work.

Gamers, on the other hand, are not behaving rationally and demanding appropriate compensation or the right work environment. Instead, they're unprofessionally stuck in a teenager's mentality that working in gaming is somehow amazing and fun.
"it either agrees with bayesian methods or it's wrong"

This kind of faith-based statistics is pure ideology.
I would argue that CoffeeScript has less gotchas than JavaScript. And, while you can be a trixy wizard with CoffeeScript, it certainly isn't required. The leaner and more linguistic syntax would aid beginners.
There are multiple morality frameworks, most including torture, and very few that don't. Western Christianity (ie. "New Testament") and it's "atheist variant" Humanism are fully opposed to torture (unless you count banishment as torture, which some do), but most other ideologies aren't.

Take the old testament, which is certainly a moral framework. Or, when it comes to frameworks in use, islam's moral framework, for example, specifies torture as punishment for crimes (whippings, beatings, certain prescribed forms of execution, forcing children to witness execution of convicted parents, ...). But this is not the exception, most religions support torture, mostly only as punishment:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Da%E1%B9%87%E1%B8%8Da_%28Hindu_...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capital_and_corporal_punishment...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Punishments_in_religio...

It's not limited to religions either. For instance, most or all person cults support torture.

A lot of people have serious trouble with the concept of multiple moralities, yet of course that's exactly what different religions are. People seem to find it easy to tolerate, oh going to temple instead of church, but if you disagree on marriageable age, slavery, or punishment then you're a monster. Never mind that by that standard, the majority the planet's population fails.
The priceless quote here for me is:

“Schedule 40 hours a week and you get 38. Schedule 50 and you get 39 and everyone hates work, life, and you. Schedule 60 and you get 32 and wives start demanding you send out resumes."

That's a pretty great approximation of my experience with the concept.
Why would SRI protect against a MITM, who can simply change the embedded hashes? (not to mention that there's plenty of non-"resource" content that would not be hashed in the first place, yet an attacker might want to change)

Unless my understanding of SRI is totally wrong, it is to protect against malicious changes to third-party resources, usually by the hosts of those resources (or someone attacking them) or a poisoned cache thereof, not to guard against MITM.
> Then it is not clear to me why a driver that uses the Uber app to find passengers, who is not an Uber employee, would not be allowed to refuse a service animal.

Uber did try what you said as a defense, and they lost, so it seem courts think that because Uber is a huge company, with much more than 15 people, it's on them to find a way to be compliant with ADA.

Weather or not drivers are subcontractors or not doesn't even come to play.

Because lets face it. If they didn't thats such a huge hole, that in a lot of cases corporations would be able to structure themselves in a way that they could avoid that.
Free or not-free - there are none at the moment.

ClamAV last time I checked missed over 30% of in the wild malware which renders it pretty much useless. AV-Comparatives and VBulletin have long stopped testing it for this reason.
One of the big open questions is "are APIs copyrightable?"

The Australian equivalent to the US Supreme Court considered this over 20 years ago, and imho got the correct result (not copyrightable): http://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/cth/HCA/1...

IMHO they got the Huffman table wrong, although arguably it was the result compelled by an overprotective approach.
"Absolutely amazing. The guy called up Christie’s and was like “Hi, I have tens of millions of dollars that I’d like to spend on nothing; if I gave you $20 million would you sell me a digital receipt entitling me to nothing?” And “the team in China was clever enough” to sell him a Picasso instead. Like, “Oh yes, we appreciate your sophisticated taste in nothing, but we are fresh out of nothing; have you considered that tens of millions of dollars will buy you actual paintings by famous artists? Perhaps you have heard of literally Picasso?”"
It is concerning that Google, Facebook, et al can, in a totally opaque manner, change what billions of people will discover on the internet.

I don't know the legal niceties here. Regulating these companies as utilities may be a stretch but perhaps Congress could force them to be more transparent about how topics/pages/etc are ranked and particularly about specific decisions to boost/de-boost certain topics/pages/etc (assuming those decisions are being made).
I'd really wish for a paid app store on Linux to be more common, especially for open source apps. Make it a monthly recurring donation even, but send me a proper bill for bookkeeping.
That's a very security minded methodology. But I cannot comfortably afford to throw away a phone which is under warranty when it has a hardware issue.

The Apple store employee made sure to show me they were executing the erase of my phone before I left the table. I had to put in my passcode to initiate the erase.
You can. But you may not be allowed to delete videos because the dog doesn't agree with your politics.
In order of importance:

1. Paycheck
2. People
3. Purpose

When you get lucky you have all 3. Most of use are pretty happy when we have the first 2. If you are paid enough then you may not care about the other two.
This ^

To me the question - independent of whether the organization is non-profit, for-profit, public, or private - is the organization itself mission-driven?

And if yes, do I deep-down want to that mission to be successful?
If only there was a straightforward way to manage the credentials used by cloudflared for tunnels, bind them to specific websites, and revoke them.

In principle, there is no reason at all to use TLS inside the tunnel — the tunnel itself is authenticated and encrypted. Unfortunately, cloudflare tunnels feel a bit like a cute 20% project that was never quite finished and is barely integrated with the rest of cloudflare’s offering.

Hey jgc et all, if you’re reading this, maybe the cloudflare console UI could have a pane for managing tunnels. And the pane for managing website origin servers could let you choose between the traditional cloudflare-initiated connection and a tunnel, and the tunnel mode could give some controls for how the origin server is protected, whether connections load balance across multiple tunnels, etc. And maybe even really open-source the tunnel client for real, because it would be quite nice to have the actual origin server connect via a plugin instead of a separate daemon.

In other words, the hard part of this offering is done. Do the boring bits so it can be even better than the primary offering.
> But what if you could host a web service with no ports exposed? Well, you can! Cloudflare Tunnel makes a persistent outbound connection (a tunnel!) between your server and Cloudflare's nearest datacenter. All the traffic to your domain flows through this outgoing tunnel and connects to your server through the protection of Cloudflare. This also has the benefit of being seamlessly encrypted, so you don't have to worry about a thing when it comes to the security of your web service.

Well, a port is exposed, it's just exposed on Cloudflare's reverse proxies. And I think this is probably a dramatic overstatement of the security that Cloudflare provides...
Can anyone in the space explain why it would be hard for Intel to be competitive in the GPU space? Is GPU development so far away from CPU development that they couldn't succeed?