jkeisling/hacker-news-corpus-2007-2022 huggingface dataset:
Snapchat originally set out to raise $40 million, but demand for the round skyrocketed, and it decided to shoot for an ambitious $900 million instead. When that didn’t work out, it dialled it back to $500 million.

Mind boggling.
You can usually set UPX options to fix that kind of thing. You may have stripped necessary linking information. I usually use it on statically linked things though, so no issue there.
I experience this when I have the flu.
Actually, they are waiting for module Imports to standardize and get some actual real-world usage. Once that happens, they may move onto HTML Imports. But I feel like they could probably get away with just doing `import Template from "./somefile.html"` using module resolvers.
Let's Support the Country: Who’s Hiring In The Coronavirus Economy.

Zoom, 2,400-person video conferencing company has 235 open roles in sales, support, marketing, HR, Finance, engineering

https://www.forbes.com/sites/alexandrasternlicht/2020/03/20/...

Amazon is hiring 100,000 workers, Walmart is hiring 150,000 — here are the sectors adding jobs amid coronavirus

https://www.marketwatch.com/story/amazon-is-hiring-100000-wo...

Domino's hiring 10,000 employees amid coronavirus demand surge

https://www.foxbusiness.com/markets/dominos-hiring-coronavir...

CVS to hire 50,000 workers, gives bonuses to employees amid coronavirus pandemic

https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2020/03/23/cvs-health-h...

Dollar General Add 50,000 Jobs

https://www.forbes.com/sites/alexandrasternlicht/2020/03/20/...

7-Eleven, an international convenience chain with more than 70,000 stores, announced Friday it will be hiring as many as 20,000 store employees.

Kroger is hiring 10,000 new associates nationwide across retail stores, manufacturing plants and distribution centers

Safeway, a national grocery chain, is looking to fill 2,000 new jobs located mainly in California.
Please stop with the trolling if you can't actually understand the problem. Meditation doesn't solve every problem in life.
I thought the same thing as you (answers prayers == more perfect), but figured proponents of the argument would ignore that. If a perfect being must answer prayers and prayers aren't answered (which seems to be the case), then it's kind of hard for a perfect being to exist. Either that or everyone is praying to the wrong gods.
I think one fundamental flaw in this study is that Word is a text editor and LaTeX is a markup format. It is just strange to compare a markup format to an editor. For LaTeX they list that at least "TeXnicCenter, LaTeX Editor, Kile, or WinEdit" were used. Word has a lot of helpful features for writing English Word documents (might be less helpful with Quechua) but the helpfulness of the editor varies greatly in the LaTeX world. I mean, it is possible to produce LaTeX text files from Word and doing so is a great example of how the editor matters.

So this major confound may be why LaTeX users seem so error prone. Word is one of the best editors for English text but maybe WinEdit is not.

I hope this fails to influence journal publishers. It is garbage.
That guy you mention in spite of his very technical background also avoided the technical details and possibly also tried to sensationalize: I was worried as he claimed that the SSH is broken, but it seems that there is no document that states that for the passive capture of the SSH traffic (at least the documents are there and everybody can analyse them).

However we already knew for a while that the active attacks are being done:

http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/dec/07/north-kore...

The active attack can of course obtain enough information to decrypt the traffic automatically afterwards or even record it unencrypted. It appears that's the context of the SSH decryption in the documents.
We are a Perl shop and this is good new for us - we need PSGI and multiple databases - This _could_ be the step we are looking for to offload our web stack...it is taking too much time to manage all that, rather than getting on with coding!
Yes, but it is in the opposite to what the parent comment advocated (prevention of any incidents)
Haha, there is a definition of Marlena:

Definition: A wonderful wife. Every man should have such an incredible wife. We got married in 1976, too, and life's only gotten better.

http://xlinux.nist.gov/dads//HTML/marlena.html
30x agree. I got a crock pot for my dorm. Best decision ever. Being able to come back from classes to have the entire hall smell like delicious chili is only surpassed by eating it.
agreed. Will update it later when mediatemple is more stable. thanks for the feedback.
Gimp and vim [1] may be difficult to learn, but invest a little time in them and you won't need anything else [2].

[1] Many would prefer to substitute emacs

[2] This doesn't cover sound or video editing, but there are programs to do that as well.
I smelled smoke 4 years ago and promptly evacuated (to rails). Rob Conery was always my favorite asp.net open source dev, I hope he's able to teach the Microsoft community what exactly they are missing.
I imagine it's also for tracking how far through the article readers get. That would be useful feedback for the writer: "Katy, you lost 44% of the audience after page three..."
> My breakfast would involve stuffing myself with as much food as I could fit in my morning stomach. I followed that with a light lunch around 2-3pm, and then almost no dinner (or a low-calorie snack if I was hungry – examples in the appendix).

I wonder how this plays into a more muscle-building oriented plan. Doesn't seem like being calorie deficient all evening into next morning would be good for building muscle.
A gentle decline rather than an exodus. Roughly 12% of websites use it today down from 16% a year ago.

http://w3techs.com/technologies/details/cp-flash/all/all
That was a really nice explanation. I like they you write.
Try Berkeley.
our ancestors ate mostly hunted food

Actually, most archeologists and paleoanthropologists are beginning to accept that most meat was SCAVENGED, not hunted, as I mentioned earlier.

It is through scavenging that humans became "omnivores" capable of eating meat in the first place, but we certainly didn't become carnivores that should eat meat as any significant part of their diet.

http://www.mesacc.edu/dept/d10/asb/origins/hominid_journey/s...

Your preference in food

Trichinellosis, Bovine spongiform encephalopathy, Listeria, E. Coli, and Trichina worms will effect anyone, so my "preference in food" is based upon characteristics present in all humans.

As for the taste, fruits taste the best raw/uncooked for everyone with natural taste-buds. My taste-buds aren't abnormal.
this is a press release to techcrunch

they have an engineering blog as well http://tech.blog.greplin.com/
> ublock also blocks api.google.com

There is no filter which matches "api.google.com", so this can't be blocked, unless you have a custom filter which does that.

> also breaks a lot of sites that uses the google common javascript library CDN

uBlock uses third-party filter lists such as EasyList, EasyPrivacy, Peter Lowe's, etc. It won't block more than what is spelled out in these lists. Un-select whatever filter lists which you think should not be selected.

As I have said countless times now, uBlock will block as much as ABP blocks when using same filter lists.

As always, if you think something is blocked which should not be (for example if ABP with the same lists has a different behavior), I need a URL, a test case in order to be able to infirm/confirm that the problem is with uBlock and not with the filter lists. On that ground, uBlock has been quite stable for a while now, I don't remember the last time something was blocked which should not have been blocked (or vice versa) as per filter lists.
Want a social network that's for friends only? simply make registering and adding others possible by phone numbers only, and make phone numbers always visible to friends.
That was 21 years ago.

The nature of Wikipedia has evolved over time as the web has evolved over time. In fact, it followed the pattern of most large web institutions: open and freewheeling when nobody cares, consolidating and conservative as it becomes infrastructure.
> If you were looking for the next Beanie Baby for the last 20 years, do you think you would've found it?

Even easier, if you just pick the right 6 numbers you could end up with millions of dollars.
> has a lot of corner cases it can't catch

The instances of safe code that the borrow checker can't verify as such are not "corner cases" by and large, they're genuinely non-trivial patterns, often with non-obvious drawbacks such as lack of composability/modularity. Rust devs and researchers are working on better abstractions to support those cases, but these are very much the exception, not the rule.

> people routinely write more inefficient code to satisfy it

People should stop freaking out about this. The "more inefficient code" you might get by adding a few .clone() or Rc<RefCell<…>> when the borrow checker complains about something is still way more efficient than anything written in alternative "safe" languages.

The "slow" solutions are a bit noisy but that's a good thing, since it tells you where it might be worthwhile to either refactor for efficiency or document why a refactor isn't feasible.
The website states

"Pre-Loaded Apps
Some of the most popular banned & unbanned conservative sites & apps. Come pre-loaded directly on your Freedom phone."

It's basically "Conservative Phone"
You interjected “random” and that seems odd.

Correlation doesn’t mean causation but that also doesn’t mean correlation is random noise. It just means there’s an unknown relationship between facts.
I wish benchmark suites would reject those kinds of shenanigans, it's completely ridiculous and makes the results practically worthless.
1.5/12.6 = 12%

Thankfully I think the total market cap of OTC stocks worldwide is closer to ~100T so crypto is only 1%. Still a massive amount when you think about it.
Millions of md5s in hours? More like microseconds.
The solution exists for years: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-us/firefox/addon/adblock-edge/
There are much better alternatives actually, all the torrent sites that already existed before the Pirate Bay went down and don't try to surf on the "Pirate Bay" brand to serve old, static content.
I saw a popup telling me to download and install some kind of crapware.
Maybe they're running on a 15-bit architecture where a signed int would be 16384?

/s
Sorry, I don't understand this article. What exactly did the Air Force do that was wrong?
Many years ago (close to 20) I saw a cool demo of a palm-able chording keyboard, and looking around it seems that a few brave souls have actually attempted to bring the idea into production.

A good keyboard only UI (I don't trust small scale pointer input), and you could move the entire traditional PC interface over into a very discreet package.

The web would be the one place where changing UI paradigms would be hard, the web pretty much insists on fine motor skills clicking one of hundreds of visible links on a page.
IANAL, but it was always true that fair use made code exempt from copyright. Wine is alive specifically because of that.
They could become a duopoly, or (more likely) one of them could win over time. A slash often means "or".
I think Gabriel was referring to a historical moment -- Wikimedia does use Varnish now.

"We currently use Varnish for serving bits.wikimedia.org, upload.wikimedia.org, text of pages retrieved from WMF projects, and various miscellaneous web services. Nothing uses Squid."

-- https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/wiki/Varnish
I'm sure, you understand that equates directly to jobs moving to other countries. Do you prefer to keep jobs in the country or kick them elsewhere?
These companies are using human psychology in immoral ways to victimize people. Whether a person fights back (which isn’t free) or not, they are already being victimized. Some of us do fight back, but not enough to cut into the profitability of these actions. To claim one of these victims is “part of the problem” because they lack the time or capacity to defend themselves is shameful; especially since making such a statement serves to normalize the companies’ immoral actions.
I won't pretend to understand all of this. Despite having worked in systematic equities trading group, I don't have a deep understanding of market micro-structure.

I do appreciate your responding to my question.

I find the technology and ideas you're bringing to market incredibly fascinating. I can't wait to see what comes of this!
He has a whole chapter in his book about this nonsense viewpoint that is quite thought provoking.

"Everything is just stochastic process bro" is such a dumb view of the world masquerading as an intelligent thought.
Social science is a science. That's the S in STEM.
Isn’t it how it’s supposed to work?

I don’t want hackers recover my account by social engineering.

Change your bank card and restart your services.
Maven.co's entire business model is "to get talented people interested in new ways to connect with people that will pay for those talents."
For those of you who are questioning charity: water, it gets a really good rating of 67.32/70 on Charity Navigator. 87.2% of its revenue goes towards program expenses, 5.2% for administrative overhead, and 7.5% for fundraising expenses. Those numbers are for the 2011 tax year.

http://www.charitynavigator.org/index.cfm?bay=search.summary...
By cloud resource, did you mean storage? In which case, sure. But if you meant to do work "in the cloud" on the cipher text's content, the under-bad-actor-control machine is one of the "ends".
The Army found two RPG launchers, an AK47 and an RPG round under one of the bodies among the first group. Assange later acknowledged as much. "Based upon visual evidence I suspect there probably were AKs and an RPG, but I'm not sure that means anything..."

As for the kids, look at this picture and tell me how you think they knew children were inside: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/61/Col....
I really wonder whether this is a symptom of an industry that's bad at evaluating technical ability rather something that should be elevated. IME the best programmers by far are those who solve difficult technical problems quickly, whether or not they're abrasive. I don't like when they're assholes, but it doesn't matter. They still have more impact.

I used to buy into the whole "communication is king" idea but the more I program the more I just don't think it works that way. Most good coders I know communicate clearly as a side effect of being good, even if they're otherwise completely socially crippled, and they're way more productive.
Hi Joe, do you have anything on topic? Perhaps reddit or twitter might be a better forum for your post.
Or maybe the algorithms that promote this kind of bubble creation have been perfected on English content and are less efficient in other languages.
Telegram gets a lot of flak for this, but if what they're saying here is true, I believe that it's a pretty sane architecture: https://telegra.ph/Why-Isnt-Telegram-End-to-End-Encrypted-by...

Definitely a better alternative to WhatsApp in any case.
The words I've seen from AMD on this matter seem fairly clear that they intend to keep Zen 3 on AM4. Most likely they'll wait until Zen 4 on a 5nm process to switch to a new socket(in 2021).
Precisely. Any encryption that allows an attacker to significantly reason about its underlying plaintext is broken.
One of my family members was dying and extremely anxious in hospice. The person reflected on their life and wanted to make amends with some people.

I believe something like a psychedelic would’ve provided clarity. It could’ve been traumatizing, but it could’ve worked too. Patients should have a choice to accept the risk.
That line seems pretty dramatic, to say the least. Quite a bit of narrativizing is being done here.
We all do what? We don't all take your specific work, train a model on it, and then select an output to present as a new work. Those are the creative acts. And certainly, the output may be indistinguishable from something you yourself created, and given the structure and nature of neural nets it might even cause you substantial existential angst to see such work, but I don't see how any of those things would weigh in to a copyright claim. Your best bets for a claim would be either a claim of a 'derivative work' being created or perhaps that the use of your original work does not fall under the Fair Use case. Fair Use would be very weak here because generally you would need to show that the 'heart' of the work (your originals) was duplicated. Similarly a claim of 'derivative work' would have to be novel and would be very difficult when the actions of the AI author are considered to be part of the authoring process while your authorship process is very different. I could see it possible, but unlikely, than an ML system would produce something which, had it been produced otherwise by a human, could be recognized as a derivative work. That would be the criteria, likely the main if not sole criteria, used in a court case.
Take a look at some UK tests for example as they don't use graphing calculators, just scientific ones. I can't say my education was worse for it.

It does cost more to mark those tests than pure multiple choice though.
If you don't have bread, eat cake.
The standard impossible whopper has mayo, so it’s not vegan by default.

I hope this fella loses.
I'm subscribed to the RSS feed, so I check it every morning.
The amount of prose with strike-through made this unreadable for me. Safari iOS

Update: Looking at Firefox on Desktop, everything underlined in the article looked like Strike-through on my phone. Weird.
I'm fascinated by how many of the things they identified as helpful to new users were later reverted. Looking at my Windows 10 desktop all of the work they did to find a solution where all users identified a program as "running" has been undone - it's back to icons with only a subtle indicator to distinguish between those that represent shortcuts and those that represent a running program.

The Start Menu is now assumed knowledge that the furthest left icon on the taskbar is "special" and does something different to all the other shortcuts. I guess the modern equivalent of "Start" is "Type here to search" in the Cortana bar but that's not a great experience for new users. We all know the propensity for it to decide to search Bing at the slightest provocation but if you try some natural "never used a computer before" things like searching for "power off" or "shut down" you get some quite unhelpful results. (The former wants me to set up a power plan, the latter directs me to Add or Remove Programs)

It feels like computer use is assumed knowledge in 2019 - that everyone who buys a computer already knows what the Windows logo represents, how minimising and overlapping works, what the difference between an app icon and a notification tray icon is, and so on. Microsoft no longer feel the need to design so much for people buying their first ever family computer, having never even used one before. Probably true in the first world, but I wonder if this holds out globally?
Thanks for sharing, good to hear this is being democratized a little.
A few things

- Kazakh people (mostly) look nothing like Borat

- It was clearly (to me, a European) set in eastern Europe

- Cohen played on our ignorance to make us believe Rumania is Kazakhstan

- Everybody he encounters thereafter is American

- Cohen uses Borat to mock stereotypical American[0] behaviour

- I am aware just how much juvenile humour there was too

[0] applies to most places, but the film is set in America
Mondrian's integrated with e-mail, so I don't really see what the problem is. Oftentimes I'll start a discussion by mailing off a code review with some sketches of how I'll attack the problem, and then the resulting design discussion occurs in an e-mail thread, which is all recorded on the Mondrian code review if I decide to submit the CL.

Another nice feature of that is that if parts of the design discussion pertain to particular features in the code, you can attach them as such, so that the code is automatically quoted in the e-mail thread.
Your comment says nothing which actually supports the case that the article said nothing which actually supports the case that the "just-world fallacy" is fallacious. Hence, I down-voted it.
There are many, many reasons why you should not be discouraged or dissuaded by competition. I'll touch on just five:

1. The "first mover advantage" is a myth. In most industries, those who we recognize as the "first movers", weren't. They were just the first to achieve sufficient mind/market share. Others have written extensively about this. Google it, if you don't believe me.

2. Contrary to popular belief, competition is good. It establishes to customers and other investors that someone else thinks there is value in the market you are seeking to develop.

3. The competition that you view as "overwhelming" may in fact be a paper tiger. They may falter, you may out execute. Their strengths are also potential weaknesses. They are beholden to investors and employees, which makes them potentially less nimble. You are beholden to no one, and can potentially be more able to respond to new opportunities or uncovered risks.

4. Your respective offerings may end up targeting different segments of the market, and not as direct competitors. You may even end up as partners, either via contract or outright acquisition/merger.

5. If they are successful in carving out a market and generating publicity, other investors/acquirers will be looking for others with similar offerings to invest in/acquire. Even "failed" companies can be profitable to their stakeholders, if they are run smartly.

That being said, it is also important to know that if you are going to fail, fail quickly and move on. You have only one finite resource, and that is time. Don't waste it.

But - I'm going to reemphasize this so as not to end on a "downer" - don't be so fast to concede defeat just because you are faced with a little bit of competition. After all, look at the Friendster-LinkedIn-MySpace-Facebook saga.
That was an even handed assessment, and I get the sense that you have thought about this, but I think you are wrong.

Exhibit A: Gmail. Yes, it's a website, and doesn't use "HTML5" yet, but it does rival desktop applications. People prefer it over desktop applications.

When I say application I mean it in that sense. People aren't creating Skype in the browser, yet, check out http://dev.w3.org/html5/html-device/ for more on that, but people are building useful pieces of software that have become intertwined with their life.

If you grant me that people might use some websites more then they use desktop applications, then I assume we are having merely a semantic argument which is a different matter. Though, I imagine it would be difficult to put aside the fact that people use websites like they use desktop applications.

Even as fun as this is, the argument about whether or not to call these things applications has past. With things like Chrome App Store(https://chrome.google.com/webstore), the debate has been lost. The industry has decided, I merely want to voice my support for the term HTML5 Apps, as PPK has on Quirksmode.
>>As a middle-aged programmer

What do your younger colleagues think?
Yep. It became a real shit storm when they changed the driver system somewhere around Vista/7 and people found they could no longer use their old(-ish) printer with their new computer. Then again, that same backwards compatibility has been a major contributor to all the security issues over the years.
I have a /64 allocation, glhf.
Unified S-band (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unified_S-band) its a system for tracking the craft and communicating with it.
I am sure Mr. King has run out of places to put swimming pools to fill with money.

Still an excellent story.
Yep, should be able to disable autoplay via browser setting.

http://www.addictivetips.com/web/stop-auto-play-in-chrome-fi...