jkeisling/hacker-news-corpus-2007-2022 huggingface dataset:
DeepFuckingValue have not posted his position since 11 days and from what I understand when everyone was pumping the price he was gradually selling : https://www.reddit.com/user/DeepFuckingValue/

Correct me if I am wrong but He is $13.8M on the green and not like green as if his shares gained value but He actually exited and can click one button to have the money in his personal bank account and live the rich life. But on r/wallstreetbets I kept seeing posts about how he lost millions and still holding and GME meme is still a thing.

Is the show going on? Did I understand the situation terribly wrong?
uswsusp can both sign and/or RSA encrypt the image essentially from the beginning of its existence. On the other hand you in fact do not need that and can simply store the hibernation image on otherwise encrypted device (either as LV on encrypted LVM or as a file somewhere).
Most of such check are performed because a software author put some macro into autoconf.ac, sometimes without good reason or without any thought at all.

I see this such attitude in many different areas e. g. people copy-paste some config options into software configs from some outdated how-to or StackOverflow and OK with now knowing what a given option does and if it is relevant in given case.

May be with autotools it happens more often than with cmake (though I've seen enough bad CMakeLists.txt too) because there is a myth that autotools is very hard to learn so developer don't even try to read documentation and just put some random stuff into their .ac/.am files until it works for them albeit slow.
Whereas in Pijul and Darcs, commits (called patches) are diffs, not snapshots. They are based on a sound theory of patches, which allows for operations not supported by Git like commuting, as long as the commits aren't interdependent. Plus, language-specific tools can extend the notion of dependency from line-based to semantic.
12GB of RAM sounds like something is badly wrong; a typical small server should use a few GB at most. Most likely is that either your users have joined loads of big rooms, or some malformed broken room, and the IO can’t keep up with all the traffic it’s seeing so things are stacking up in RAM. Please come to #synapse:matrix.org so we can help debug it.
How does it compare with the Syncthing companion app, which is 100% open source and ad free?
I wonder what happens during blue green or canary deployment?
if your migration changes database schema in a way that affect previous version negatively?

is it even possible to do blue/green deploy if your schema changes radically?
Denmark is not an English-speaking area though.
It does, but even in places in the US where that's actually been recognized[1] the political will to maintain it doesn't always stick around.

1: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-homelessness-housing-...
No, because cycling is not for everyone. Multiple modes of transportation should be equally available, but that doesn't mean you should expect that everyone be able to use every mode.

For instance I don't see any particular utility to making infrastructure so that there's enough room for every person to use a motorized wheelchair.

Different conditions demand different solutions.
> A filesystem is the canonical means for storing files - just use it

Sure but what about the many use cases where you're not really storing files but metadata or other generated data?

A simple example might be photo libraries. The photos themselves are files but are the 5kB small and 50kB medium thumbnails generated from the photos worth storing as files? Or should they be stored as blobs in the database along with their other metadata?

It's good to know where the cutoff should be.
That's an excessively long game--much easier to compromise someone already in a position.
And with windchill, it's well below 0°F.

I've lived in Texas all my life and can't remember the last time that happened.
California, particularly the Bay Area, is quite different. 125K for a family is squarely middle class.
If social really did help to tip the scale in the Middle-East revolutions, that alone was worth it.
It's the Windows key on Windows keyboards, and the Cmd key on Mac keyboards.
Email me or sign up here - http://laughingcomputer.com
That's one thing that always bugged me about Linux desktops. I've been using Linux as my desktop OS since Debian 2.0 and the naming convention tendencies of desktop environments are counterintuitive to non-Linux users. The uninitiated just don't know what GNU is or the differences between KDE and GNOME, other than how they look and feel. If Linux desktops are aiming for usability, naming everything Gnusomething, Ksomesomthing or Gsomething is just a poor choice for application names.
I know. FYI with IE10 they created CSS3 grid layout and submitted it to W3C.
How would this neutrino beam work, as there is no feasible material that can really focus these particles? Won't a neutrino emitter (the sort we can build) be essentially isotropic. Perhaps higher-energy neutrinos would have a higher interaction cross-section, making them somewhat more 'visible'.

Long wavelength radio (near 3-20Hz) may work just as well, with potentially a better data rate (still poor) than a neutrino-encoded emitter. A "neutrino emitter" would have no 'gain', while we may find ways to build really large and orientable radio antennas. You can build an antenna that can work on wavelengths larger than the earth with very long wires strewn out into outer space. Although below 3 or so Hz, space plasma becomes opaque and that would prevent transmissions.
easy to click: http://www.triviatise.com
"I worry, I worry."
Wasn't Bitcoin always meant to be cash for computers? Bulk of cash belongs in the banks.

Mere possibility of running a node on your own and sending money directly alters the dynamic. You can use a third party service if you like. You have to use a third party to transfer dollars over the Internet.
In On Writing, by Stephen King, he goes into great detail about his writing process.

The upshot is that he's what some writers call a "Discovery Writer", he sits down at a blank page with an image, or rough idea, and just writes and sees what happen. (George RR Martin/Game of Thrones is also, believe it or not, a discovery writer).

I'm not familiar with Asimov's process, but based on Agatha Christie's genre, I'd be surprised if she didn't structure hers fairly heavily.
I'd say you're right, but it's the extra stuff that Haskell associates with monads that make them hard to learn. Here's how I'd break it down:

1. The three Monad laws, which have been beaten to death.

2. do-notation. You've started to learn Haskell, and you know the let-in syntax for introducing variable bindings, and suddenly you get hit with two NEW syntaxes: the let-but-no-in syntax, and the weird <- stuff. How do these syntaxes relate, and why (if?) are they all necessary? Also you just lost fifteen minutes because that line has a tab instead of spaces, the "last statement must be an expression" nonsense, etc.

3. Monadic APIs, especially IO. You can go through an entire Monad tutorial and be left wondering why you need category theory to get main's argv. Not to mention all of the duplication (mapM, filterM, zipWithM, etc).

Tutorials tend to focus on #1, but in my journey I found #2 and #3 to give me the most difficulty.
I'm curious about this too. I'd imagine the motivation for saving this much time would be to go home earlier to see your kids or something.

Otherwise, I'd rather spend those thirty minutes interacting with my co-workers and relaxing.
Indeed, I'm equally surprised. At my last startup we also had a voluntary group lunch. I think it was quite critical to maintain a good spirit during rapid ups and downs common to most startups. Imho absolute loners are dangerous to startups.
Can't help you with the specifics, but I have some notes from an INC article on negotiation. Might be useful (sorry for the horrible formatting, not much I can do:

--

INC Magazine
Topic: Negotiations

1.	Before you get to the table

a.	Know your alternatives

i.	BATNA – best alternative to a negotiated agreement

ii.	Be comfortable with walking away

b.	Know your counterpart

i.	Research other company

c.	Know the standards

i.	Frame your proposal within the other’s standards

2.	Opening Gambits

a.	Make an aggressive first offer

i.	Make a reasonable and defendable

ii.	Risky if your offer is too high or too low

b.	Present multiple, equivalent, simultaneous offers

i.	Offer counterpart multiple (equal) offers to see
what they prefer

3.	Responding to the Offer

a.	Make an aggressive counteroffer

i.	Stick to your own target price

b.	Consider showing your hand

i.	If counterpart is underestimating you, consider
disclosing your BATNA

c.	Counter – no matter what

i.	Always have a counter offer, even if their first
offer is ideal

d.	Take when you give

i.	When you do have to make a concession,
diplomatically ask for a reciprocal concession

e.	Avoid consistency traps

4.	Table Manners

a.	Talk face to face

b.	Sit at the corner of a table/side by side, not across a table

c.	Only talk to ask questions

d.	Mimic your opponent

e.	Act like little things are a big deal, so that you can easily drop them later
My big complaint about switching to something like Chrome OS was playing immersive games in a browser. Appears the recent development effort in browsers has heard my griping.
I was about to agree with everyone about this being a lazy question, but now I feel like an idiot because I never knew Amazon offered "AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM)" (http://aws.amazon.com/iam/), which is a godsend.

What's a shame is that right now there isn't a web-based GUI for this service yet, and the boto Python module's IAM support is currently undocumented, but at least the code is there. A bit of code reading to get it up and running.
At my first real programming job we (developers) went out to lunch together every day. We went out to restaurants, not fast food. Lunch often took 1.5 hours and sometimes 2 hours. Our boss came with us. We were a small company, so there were only four of five of us, usually.

Sometimes we talked about work, and sometimes not. When we did, we often discussed higher level stuff rather than quotidian matters. We had our boss there, so anything we decided at lunch was ready to go ahead with.

Back at the office we almost never had to have meetings, because we didn't need them. This alone is pure gold.

Outside of work some of us were actively friends, and others not. But this really didn't change lunch. Nobody was forced to go to lunch, and there was no unwritten rule that non-lunchers were outsiders. It's that lunch was pleasurable, relaxing, with good food, and we naturally talked about what we had in common.

Since that time it's never quite reached that level, but I've come close occasionally. If you've never experienced it I imagine that it might be hard to grasp how nice it can be.

I think some of what I've said above is inline with what Joel is talking about, but it's a slightly different take. Make of it what you will.
Cool! Another thing Europeans won't be able to use.
Unfortunately, eating lunch with a group of people every day tends to get very expensive. You either need to be working at a big company with a cafeteria (pass) or for a fancy place like FogCreek, otherwise it's $10-20/day to eat out all the time. Besides, I like to swing home and hang out with the cats sometimes, or work on a side project at my desk, or whatever.
I can't get over the amount of defending people do here of DOSING caffeine.

Since I don't want to keep going in circles, I'm just going to say this: replace, "dosing caffeine" with the less inflammatory, "drinking coffee." Now, consider what the difference is.

Regarding your claim that you didn't say it was a bad thing, I will remind you that you wrote, "How is that different than a junkie getting their fix to stave off withdrawl." If that's not passing judgment on someone, I don't know what is.
You are very correct. I'm also running a MT6589 (Haipai Noble N7889) on my own nodded android install.

I'm not worried.
> Is that a function call, A type declaration?

If its following a "::" then its part of a type signature and its a type constructor application. Otherwise, its part of an expression and its a regular function call.

BTW, Haskell capitalization is significant in Haskell. Identifiers starting with lower case are always regular functions. Types and type constructors always start with upper case.

> What's a parameter to what?

Application in Haskell is left associative so its

((Map String) Any)

Haskell is a functional language and programs are filled with function applications so using spaces for function application avoids a lot or syntactic noise. The only time I find this really bites me is that, due to automatic currying, passing the wrong number of arguments to a function can lead to hairy type errors. This is not a big deal if you use add a healthy amount of type annotations to your code though.
I gave up on Swift when I couldn't just do an import CommonCrypto, and had to do hackish bridging workarounds. For a language that was supposed to be much higher level and just work, it really didn't.
I acted like it was an adventure because it was the only way to deal with what I was doing. I left home, to sleep on the street, without any money or possessions, until such a time (for as far as I could see into the future) that I could get my life to a better place.

If I hadn't walked around a little in make-believe and "Scout on a quest" type mode, well... maybe I wouldn't be here.

During the darkest days on the street I thought I wouldn't live to be 20. It still haunts a little today: perhaps I should have been dead (many times over)?

By pretending it was an adventure then, and revising my personal history of it now to sound more adventurous (and less dull, traipsing on my own around cities), helps me to survive now.
No idea how common this is, but that particular case seems to most likely be fabricated.
I work in banking. AML is always a fine line. Don’t do your job well, you get hit for enabling laundering. Do your job too well and you kill millions/billions in deposits.

AML at its core is asking a bank to purposefully reduce their profit. Other than fines and morals, there’s no real incentive for them to give their all, and those don’t seem to bother most of the industry.
Even I'm not that cynical.

I would agree that ad-founded (engagement-driven) journalism is a dead-end.

Aspiring journalists will need to find other ways to pay the rent.
Agreed, but you forget about the (large) group of people who are indifferent to an issue either way and want to be left alone, and the (sometimes even larger) group of people who may have some opinion one way or the other, but don't want to join the fight.
The plagiarism that I personally see is specifically code plagiarism. I am a programming educator on youtube.com/sentdex and pythonprogramming.net

Lately, I have been digging into this, and it's far more rampant than I ever expected (I am still digging, but we're talking in the 10's of thousands of examples that I've found with basic automated searching just in matches to my own personal code). I have found some seriously absurd examples where an entire portfolio consists of my code, and the person got a job from it at a large company.

Compare a student who writes their own code to the student who plagiarizes.

If you're the non-copy-pasta student, you're competing with the fakes for jobs.

If you're an employer, you're tasked with figuring out who is who, and I strongly doubt you would personally want the copy-paster at your business for both legal and productivity reasons.

I think some people confuse plagiarism and innovation, especially when we start to wrap in "intellectual property" into it.

Plagiarism is a shortcut used to fake skills/credentials.

Innovation is a real skill, though could be debated I am sure.

Intellectual property value is up for debate.

People who are cheating/faking their way, lying about their value/skills harms both employers and students.

Just don't let people debating about plagiarism try to sneak in innovation/building-upon as a means of a straw man.

We're talking copy and paste here. Maybe some synonym swaps.
Interesting, I had forgotten about this rule. Doesn't that encourage blogspam links instead of the source with context?
Yeah there's a cheaper way. But like using Spotify versus ripping CDs or piracy, the convenience of the tool is the value.
The one's freedom fighter is somebody else's terrorist, so it's not an answer.
So then should we forget about easily accessible encryption, since it's a social problem if your government spies on your data and not a technological one? That's not a very "defense in depth" approach.

Our democracy is purposely designed to allow such checks and balances through mechanisms like the fifth amendment. It is an important part of what makes our democracy strong and prevents lawmakers from throwing people in prison at their whim.
Why not grep+awk ifconfig if you need your IP from a script?
Saw adverts for Chrome browser on the Tube a few years back
If you can understand the the core ideas of data structures and how to manipulate them (Arrays, Loops, Conditionals, Objects etc.), and can put that understanding into practice to solve a problem, you really are 90% of the way there.

Learning another language is easy, just try it :) Also a language like Python really is a breath of fresh air if your only experience is PHP.
Surely this is a prime candidate for the Hawthorne effect?

From Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hawthorne_effect
The Hawthorne effect is a form of reactivity whereby subjects improve or modify an aspect of their behavior being experimentally measured simply in response to the fact that they are being studied, not in response to any particular experimental manipulation.
I'm not a fan of Teaching languages, teach algorithms and clean concepts. It takes much time to get good at a language you might as well be using one to learn your algorithms with.

And not just the language but the Version Control, Libraries, Documentation Tricks, Culture, and Relationships that come with truly learning a Language.
Not even a specification.

By the way, I know a few of the names there and I know how completely different their computing tastes and personalities are. I would love to see the archives for the discussion mailing-list for this one, will be very entertaining .. and informative :-)
Just go to Gawker site and try the link "Forgot Password". If your email is not registered with Gawker, it will tell you the same.
Could they downgrade the firmware?
Very easily. Share the wealth now, and population growth will slow. When there are fewer humans on the planet, standards of living will rise.

If humanity can't accept the temporary reduction of some people's standard of living to save civilization, then there is no hope. Therefore, I choose to believe you are wrong here.

Incidentally, the people who have made everyone's life worse aren't those who are going to fix the situation. They're those who kept borrowing from future generations to make their lives better.
Lol Big Tech spying on their own. Beautiful.
I know of one that's extremely similar: http://www.arclanguage.org
PHP has thrived due to the mindset of wanting to get pages on the web with the least amount of effort to configure or understand the stack. It's what I've always seen people cite as the reason for adopting PHP. The language isn't simple, it's full of inconsistency, but the deployment is simple, the setup is simple with default Apache and mod_php, the 1:1 correspondence between web pages and files on the filesystem is simple.

It should be expected that the same mindset would lead to unpatched servers and inattention to the nuances of the stack.
"the dual motor Model S will quickly torque sleep a drive unit when torque is not needed and instantly wake it up as the accelerator is pressed to command more torque."

I can't understand this, is first torque meant to be toggle?
Or you could use a library explicitly designed with these considerations in mind, that offers the same powerful, familiar combinators, with resource safety and speed. e.g.,

Machines in Haskell: https://hackage.haskell.org/package/machines

Scalaz Stream in Scala: https://github.com/scalaz/scalaz-stream

I've no doubt an equivalent exists for Clojure, too, although I'm not familiar enough with the language to point you in the right direction.

One of the most amazing things about writing the IO parts of your program using libraries like these is how easy they become to test. You don't have to do any dependency injection nonsense, as your combinators work the same regardless of whether they're actually connected to a network socket, a file, or whether they're just consuming a data structure you've constructed in your program. So writing unit tests is basically the same as testing any pure function - you just feed a fixture in and test that what comes out is what you expect.

I found this really useful when writing a football goal push notifications service for a newspaper I work for. I realised that what the service was essentially doing was consuming an event stream from one service, converting it into a different kind of stream, and then sinking it into our service that actually sent the notification to APNS & Google. The program and its tests ended up being much more succinct than what I would normally write, and the whole thing was fun, and took hardly any time.

I would say that is the right tool for the job.
The win here wasn't about scale, though. A tiny fraction of wikipedia users are logged in.

The win here was about individual page load time. And page load time is just as important, if not more so, for something new trying to vigorously grow as it is for the big sites.

(Disclaimer: HHVM alum.)
>You can buy VPS from Amazon and host your hidden tor service there and Amazon guys won't have a clue until NSA guys will come to them.

Amazon can monitor what runs on their servers.
~5 billion metric tons is what we emit.
What % of bitcoin owners own it for political reasons along your lines, compared to people just using it as an investment?
The typical use case is "As a business user, I want to automate my existing workflow or create new functionality through automation. I have little or no ability to change anything (either due to vendor- or IT-apathy). Therefore my input, output, and applications-used are effectively frozen."

Typically, applications will be a mix of web (potentially back to IE-11-only type stuff), Windows (including whatever old UI libs might have been used), and mainframe (via emulator).

None of these have modern-style APIs (except for mainframe via the surprisingly foresightful HLLAPI).

So tl;dr, "I want to do new things, but can't change anything." An example would be insurance companies having to quickly alter their processing, in a matter of months, due to the Affordable Care Act.

Using the med insurance example, an average claims processors will have to interact with a claims system (3rd party Windows app), workflow management / audit system (3rd party Windows app), possibly core data systems (mainframe and/or legacy DB), and 1+ ancillary unsynchronized data systems (e.g. med review, communication portals, external processors for various functions). All of this to do a "pay the claim" process. For 100+ claims a day.

So that "stack" is your average automation target, which you typically want 100% automation coverage against, or it isn't viable.

The typical buyer is almost always on the business side. Either a business VP or Director, or someone under the CFO.

CFO-initiated projects usually focus on cost saving by re-onshoring low-value work previously offshored to India et al. Data entry into legacy systems, etc.

Surprisingly, another key reason is usually "increasing ability to own and quickly change processes" (vs simply headcount reduction)! But organizations are waking up to the peril of that's-too-legacy-to-change components.