jkeisling/hacker-news-corpus-2007-2022 huggingface dataset:
>most participants need to display the first list of traits

That's exactly how it is. Those with a slave morality are controlled, guided, and protected by those with a master morality to keep society running.

A society of masters moralities will eventually develop a pecking order and will recalibrate itself.
I'm sorry I will not give direct answer simply because it should not be taken lightly and without proper atmosphere and an experienced guidance can go out of control.

But if you keep your interest and intention to try experience something different - I'm sure you will find out.
"Meat-friendly" burgers, like "gluten-friendly" food that has a little gluten in it.
The phones are expensive. They are not a commodity.

Also, when you buy a new phone, you don't get to choose what operating system you want to install on it and then buy that OS. The phone+os ships together as a single entity.
posting here is a good place. Have you tried http://www.partnerup.com and Cofounder.com?
did you market to political communities like dailykos? They are often trying to do things like this, maybe figure out how to "integrate" with them or sites like theirs
Haha - good point
Probably none.

TWIST has enough of a fanbase without having to misrepresent who and what they are (it's not like Leo owns 'This Week in...')

As for 'sleazy', I think even Jason himself would admit that of all the things he's done, this is pretty low on the list of things that could be accused of sleaziness.
This is an interesting standpoint, but I'm not sure I entirely agree. Ebooks have made vast strides recently, but there's just something about leafing through a book that they just can't seem to match. Perhaps it's the nostalgia talking, but reading a novel on a Kindle just seems a whole lot more sterile than an actual paperback.

Even for reference materials, ebooks still seem like the bastard child of a reference textbook and a proper hyperlinked manual.
I noticed that, I just don't understand why people who don't have them are so negative about them.
When you can get more movies and television than you could ever consume for only $8/mo and ten million songs for only $5/mo, it's hard to argue. I mean, would you rather pay $30 for a Bluray that you'll watch once (twice, to be generous) or spend that $30 on almost four months of on-demand content? Spend $15 for a CD or spend the same for three months access to an enormous catalog of music?

In a world where you not only need serials and registration to play multi-player games, but many single player games, it's becoming difficult to even argue against digital download game services, like Steam (on which I currently have 400+ games). Hell, you don't even have to concern yourself with shelf space, theft, loss, or damage anymore.

The problem is that you also have to accept several negatives. Like DRM or the inability to resell a purchased book, album, movie, or game.

The problem is that you have to make several leaps of faith, too. Faith that the source of your content will still be around for the length of time that you'd own the physical version (several generations, in the case of books). Faith that their DRM won't bite you in the ass. Faith that something won't happen to your account which restricts your access to your content and that if it does, their customer services is accessible and responsive. Faith that they won't suddenly yank content you've already paid. Faith that they won't do any dirty aggregation or data mining as you use content that you own.

I'm all for digital, but I think we need some serious commitment from publishers and distributors and content warehouses before we continue making huge investments into what is essentially a collection of content licenses. An industry-enforced sort of "bill of digital content consumer rights" wouldn't be unreasonable.
Moving those discussions into a searchable website/forum would benefit everybody.
As described in the article, it's the self-driving computer who is "steering by wire", not the human driver.

If the powered steering fails, then the computer cannot steer. Therefore, there was redundancy in the powered steering system. The redundancy was removed because of a chip shortage, and this was considered acceptable because the self driving feature still requires the driver to keep hands on the steering wheel anyway.
> It seems obvious to me that the people talking about NFTs and secondary markets in games have not played any MMO for any length of time, or they'd know about nerfing and expansions.

The weirdest part is that origin story for Ethereum is literally what you're talking about but somehow everyone is pitching that as a solution despite it clearly not being capable of preventing the same thing from happening again:

> I happily played World of Warcraft during 2007-2010, but one day Blizzard removed the damage component from my beloved warlock's Siphon Life spell. I cried myself to sleep, and on that day I realized what horrors centralized services can bring. I soon decided to quit.

(https://about.me/vitalik_buterin)
To be honest, a job is a job that pays the bills. Civilization is a huge resource optimization machine, and while there are pathologies, generally I believe in the market economys capability in guiding resource utilization. I.e. if someone pays for a job to be well done, I presume it is a job that's worth doing.

Mind you, for me it's obvious my employers software is useful as it is used in large construction project globally. Hence, for me I can point at buildings and say our work helped in achieving them.

I also to like to work with other people - there is very nice sense of achievement when a team manages to ship the next version to happy customers.
This probably depends on where you are using it. If I understand correctly, it tells an attacker that you have _something_ to hide, but gives no clue as to any metadata, such as the size of what you're hiding or how often it was updated.

Suppose a government agency is demanding that you decrypt... something, they're not sure what, or how much there is, or even if there's anything there. In a country with a strong rule-of-law, I think you're unlikely to have a court enforce sanctions against you to make you produce cleartext _that may not even exit_, unless they have very strong evidence from another source that it does exist. If you're in a more authoritarian country where the police can hold you for a long time just on the off-chance that there's more cleartext to get, then I don't think this helps you much.

Actually, I think we can maybe summarize: you probably shouldn't use this to defend against someone who would have no qualms just straight-up torturing you.
I work in the security industry. The products I work on help keep hundreds of thousands of people safer in an online world whose threat landscape is expanding daily. That sounds like a marketing sound bite, but it's absolutely true.
I'm not a Java person, but I think Dropwizard advertises with basically that idea.
Instead of trying to stop the changes (which is probably impossible), why don’t we focus on adapting to what will inevitably become the new normals.
I used to do the same thing, but the papers were free and left out in bins by the cafeteria entrance. I think lots of people will pick up a paper and read it while they drink coffee or eat lunch (even if it's just for the crossword or funnies).

But newspapers are interested, obviously, in who will actually buy it. And I'm not sure that those free subscriptions in college really translated into many post-college sales, at least not immediately.

FWIW, I do subscribe to two papers now, one daily and one just Sundays. The daily is for news, the Sunday is for the coupons. (Coupons pay for the paper many times over if you use them.) The daily was absurdly cheap when I bought the subscription ... less than a dime or so a day IIRC. It won't be that cheap when the subscription runs out so I doubt I'll renew. Most days I don't read it and I feel bad about all the waste.
because he was born 24 years and 6 months ago, duh! ;-)
Check your state law, non-compete may not be legal.
Who said Tom Cook was enlisted? That's not a very charitable interpretation...

Here's the interpretation. Tom Cook has ideas. They aren't particularly interesting ones (they aren't 'idiotic', rather they seem mundane). Tom Cook made statements including his ideas. He is nobody's patsy.

WP made an appeal from authority in its article about Tom Cook. It implied that his ideas were interesting somehow because he is an authority figure. But on their own - no the ideas are not anything new.
To be fair, someone who has a lot of experience with film cameras could legitimately ask the same question. Why the hell would a completely different technology ape the noises of a previous generation?
It's a common trope, particularly among the more intellectually focused, to reduce sports to mindless drudgery.
This article appears to include a lot of very good advice(speaking as an AWS solutions architect). I might suggest a emphasising a few things such as not having keys on login accounts(they negate multi-factor auth if leaked), and to ALWAYS pick or create a new IAM role if you aren't sure an existing one fits for the EC2 instances.. But perhaps this sort of advice is not appropriate for the article.

Much respect for the amount of work that went into this. I'll try to get through it all here at some point :)
But only because von Neumann was a philosopher.

Before Newton, physics used to be called natural philosophy. Newton made it tractable.

Before von Neumann, strategy was philosophy.

("But it's so simple. All I have to do is divine from what I know of you: are you the sort of man who would put the poison into his own goblet or his enemy's? Now, a clever man would put the poison into his own goblet, because he would know that only a great fool would reach for what he was given. I am not a great fool, so I can clearly not choose the wine in front of you. But you must have known I was not a great fool, you would have counted on it, so I can clearly not choose the wine in front of me.")

After von Neumann, strategy became tractable.

(Obviously, this view of history is very simplified.)
Not a great analogy. People aren't looking to make "interoperable movies". But let's play that out for a moment. Would a copy of star wars with different actors, different scenic design, different music be much of a salable product? I don't think so.

While I think it would be GREAT to see what Nick Nolte (Lucas was considering him) would have done with Han Solo over the wooden Harrison Ford, I'm not sure I care enough to sit through it all again to find out. Blech.
Note that someone disabled can train the service dog themselves, though-- there's no certification, requirement of specific breed, etc.
I've got several different phone numbers, and they each receive different amounts and types of spam. You'd think given the limited size of the phone number space, that spammers would just dial numbers indiscriminately. However, it appears that they still operate using lists of more-likely victims. By entering my phone number in random forms, I'd worry that it could be used as another indication of a good number to call to bother real humans. Of course that's in addition to the obvious doxing of my online nym if done from the wrong browser VM.
Don't do a job that legally requires you to potentially have a service animal in your car then...
If Uber drivers are employees, it is probably legal (and possibly mandatory for the employer) to take the employee health impact into account when assigning employees.

If Uber drivers are independent service providers to the passenger matched through a matchmaking service, and the law prohibits discrimination against people with service animals, they probably are not.

Different jurisdictions (even within the US) may treat Uber drivers differently resulting in different results.
I didn’t say that it wasn’t fair use, but it would have ended much sooner if it would have been trivially fair use.
Season tickets. Teams prefer season tickets because they force fans to buy the whole season, including the boring games. Plus they get a bunch of the money up front. But most fans can't go to every game, so you get a big secondary market.
How can you ensure that the fire detection circuitry isn't ever mis-wired in the field (such that when engine 1 catches fire that the computer knows that it's engine 1 and not engine 2)? If that happens (and it's certainly the case that engine indicators have been crossed before in the field), the pilot now couldn't shut down the engine with the fire (theorizing that the computer wouldn't allow the discharge of fire bottles and cutoff of fuel to the only engine NOT displaying a fire alarm).

Or an engine that's streaming fuel (but not burning). Mid-ocean, you might want to cut the fuel to ensure you make landfall.

Substitute other failure scenarios as you need, realizing that any system has cases where the pax die when an alternate system would have saved them, but also vice versa.

It's not that we can't get systems that are right way more often than they're wrong, but that's still a long way to go from there to taking control from the pilot(s), IMO.

A determined suicidal pilot can find a way. If they can't, then they don't even need to be on the airplane right?

Disclaimer: I'm a [small airplane] pilot and well aware that I'm more likely to cause a crash from my own doing than from poor maintenance, but I definitely subscribe to the Boeing philosophy more than the Airbus...
"but my client had also quoted them a price which was 3 times my original quote amount."

There's your answer. You just found your new rates. Get a part-time dev job if you lose work for a while, to keep the lights on.
Stick to that 3X amount and don't waver. Profit.
Other than the index data, there's something even bigger.

Google's biggest PR success is convincing everyone that the quality of web rankings depends almost purely on algorithms. It does not. What allows Google to hold their monopoly is the $100s of millions (or more) they continuously pay to amass more manually created training data:

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/11/27/google_raters_manual

http://www.forbes.com/sites/timworstall/2012/11/27/is-google...

A new search engine could appear today with algorithms 10x better than Google, but without access to this scale of training data, their rankings wouldn't even be close to Google's quality.

Google maintains their position by paying cash for this monopoly on training data made by tens of thousands of $9/hour workers, not through superior algorithms!
Not if the slaves don't die.

This is what doomed blacks in America actually. They had a tendency not to die at the rate that natives and immigrants did. We know that on northern canal projects... thousands of immigrants and natives might die in a single season from malaria... but blacks didn't seem too affected at all by these sorts of environments. (Look it up... even with the Erie canal, which was really well run medically speaking, 1,000 men could die every season from malaria. The southern canals didn't suffer these kinds of casualties. Why?) Well today, of course, we KNOW about the sickle cell and how it helps a human with respect to malaria. But put yourself in the shoes of a camp doctor in the 17th, 18th or 19th centuries... I'd be willing to bet that the survival rate of the blacks would have seemed nothing short of miraculous to you.

This is the, not so politically correct, reason that blacks were doomed to slavery. They didn't die doing work that most other people DID die doing. This is WHY they were more economical. Immigrants would never have been able to complete the canals that the slaves completed in the South. Because, since it was the South, the mosquito problem would have been even more acute. The death rate even higher. And on top of all of that... the geography was agitating against them. It would have been a catastrophe to even attempt those canals with immigrants or natives.

Not to sound racist or anything... but that's the whole reason we HAD the blacks. To put it all into dollars and cents... S-O-A was going to be about 60 some odd miles long and cost just $500,000. And the geography was actually FAR tougher to build a canal on than the geography along the Erie. By comparison the Erie was 5 or 6 times longer... but cost 14 TIMES as much. Largely down to the use of waged labor that died easily. If they had used blacks... even if they paid them the same wages... due to the difference in death rate... the cost would have been only 9 to 11 times that of the S-O-A. If they had used slaves... it would have been cheaper per mile than the S-O-A.

These financial realities did not go unnoticed by northern elites. And the animosities these realities created exploded into civil war eventually.
hahahaha, No.
While from a syntactic point of view, the statement "there is almost nothing you can do in C with a function pointer" may be technically correct, there are all sorts of useful things you can do with them which the article could have mentioned in more detail: writing generic functions via call-backs, low-level object oriented programming, replacing production APIs with "mock objects" for testing, etc. I use them in my C code quite frequently.
Another Micro Four Thirds convert here: got an Olympus E-P5 and several great lenses a month or two ago and have been having a blast with them. I got the 17mm f/1.8 that comes in the kit along with the VF-4 viewfinder. (Thank you Olympus for putting a good lens in the kit!) Also picked up the Olympus 60mm f/2.8 macro, 45mm f/1.8 portrait lens, the Panasonic 45-175mm, and the Samyang/Rokinon/Bower 7.5mm fisheye. They are all very fine lenses, but the macro and the fisheye have to be my favorites for pure fun factor.

(Tip: the same fisheye lens is sold under all three names. Amazon carries all three and the prices bounce up and down wildly in the $250-$350 range. So put them all in your cart and check it once in a while to see when one of them is down close to $250.)

The quality of these lenses combined with their small size and light weight makes the system a real winner for me.

I've never actually owned a DSLR. I used to shoot with a Nikon FE film SLR with some nice lenses, but switched to compact cameras when I went digital. The Canon S95 I used for the last couple of years takes great pictures. But I wanted to be able to get fisheye photos (for panorama stitching) and better macro shots, and the m4/3 has really delivered.

Thom Hogan is right that Olympus and Panasonic are having trouble selling enough of these cameras and lenses, and it probably is because people aren't moving from DSLRs to m4/3 but instead just using their smartphone cameras. For most of the photos people take most of the time, that's more than good enough.

But I also agree with his conclusion: no one should be scared away from m4/3 because of these uncertainties. You can get great cameras and great lenses right now and use them for many years.

These were taken with the Olympus and various lenses (except for the stained glass photo that I took many years ago). Some are just snapshots, but a few I'm really pleased with. All are straight out of the camera except for cropping, and defishing in the photo of the two dogs:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/geary/
Weird. I've lived along the SC coast (Charleston & Hilton Head) my entire life and I have never really understood the "Southern Hospitality" term. I suppose living in the most affluent areas of the state could have something to do with it?
guess why Germany has such strong privacy laws :)
That said, I suspect I'd actually spend a crapload more money on eBooks if they typically cost $6. If something like an eBook costs $10, I'll figure out how to do without. Price it at $6 and it's just a little above the level of impulse buy -- a lot harder to resist.
Could the fact that his "conversion rate" went down when people were given outbound links be explained by the fact that they would rather visit those links than keep reading? I know that if I saw a resume with both a link to a GitHub profile, and to a blog, I'd ignore the blog, stop reading the resume (though perhaps downloading it first in case I needed to contact them) and start reading their code.
Note that ArrayControllers (which are often/always used as part of an "each" loop, and can set via itemController in handlebars, if needed) are not singletons, unlike standard controllers. Very useful for lists of items that need individual control.
Marketing/psychology tricks.

Apple has convinced people that wearing their products give them "uniqueness". Tesla has something similar, but with "change the world".

You will hear other excuses that are more tangible, but those are the brain listing features that have little to do with why someone bought it.

Apples poor record on privacy, security, performance, and ease of use should all be stark reminders that marketing sells products.
No, it wasn't novel. History is full of prior examples of large scale outbreaks. Wide scale, highly detailed simulations have been performed over the years. Crisis managers have warned for decades that we were not prepared for the next pandemic.

In addition, crises of different nature have similar structures. The readiness to deal with the structure of crises of different nature can be tested.
>I must live in a bubble. I don't experience the emotion of disgust. I don't know people who experience the emotion of disgust.

And yet, you went ahead to perfectly describe (in all but the explicit term), how you are effectively disgusted by the supporters of the previous US President, the people who use the word disgust, and Republicans in general - and in a completely unrelated thread to boot.

One could very well ascribe this to virtue signalling and projection.
> ... they gave up their right to live ...

You’re stating a moral axiom, one that is widely and increasingly rejected in civilised countries.

Assuming you mean “capital punishment for intentional murderers” then how do you defend this? A murderer kills to satisfy some need, you appear to wish to death on someone to satisfy some need of your own ie “justice”, even presumably when you aren’t personally victimised by their crime.

It seems capital punishment creates at least two evils - an unnecessary taking of human life, and the encouragement of sadistic ideation in the general population.
I was forced to fall on this trap once: a guy has a small Flask app up and running, and he asked for help to implement: an ORM with migrations, an Admin and form validation (among other things that had nothing to do with Django such file parsing).

I suggested to migrate the app from Flask to Django while it was small and simple, but he refused for Django is "too big and complicated". OK, then. We ended up creating a monstrosity of Flask half-assed packages to include functionality that is already included in Django (think cache, csrf, admin...), plus WTForms, plus SQLAlchemy, plus Alembic, hard to test, hard to keep updated, hard to deploy, and so complex that it turned non-migrable to Django. Development felt like walking through mud.