jkeisling/hacker-news-corpus-2007-2022 huggingface dataset:
Andy Zaky is a well known AAPL Bull and he has a track record of being far more accurate than almost every Wall Street analyst.

He generally does not hold AAPL or any stock he comments on however. See his seekingalpha bio page.

Fortune really should provides a mandatory disclosure though.
There's several previous cases of RF interference causing this.
Any article that uses the sentence "mostly men" in the first paragraph is highly likely not worth reading.
That post was about deduplication incorrectly identifying rare tracks as not unique. I’ve ran into that on play music and it is very annoying.

That said, play music was replaced by youtube music. My collection of 10k uploaded songs was moved into the new app without issue. Playlists and all.
If you look at Norway Tesla lost half of its market share last year. I don't think they will have a problem surviving but I also don't think the other manufacturers are going to sit idly by for much longer.
https://archive.is/AqtRg
There is nothing 'mysterious' about this, this is just how radios work. Neither does it have to be malicious.

Most car key fobs work in the 433MHz range, if there is something in the area transmitting at said frequency, it will cause the relatively weak signals from keys fobs to be blocked. This it why we have electromechanical compatibility (EMC) certification for any electrical devices being sold.

With the market being flood with cheap electronics from foreign manufacturers who do not care about getting certified, a single misbehaving weather station, 'smart' door bell, or baby monitor can cause disruptions to other wireless devices.
But there is a best investment strategy: the one that maximises growth.

A constant-fraction rebalanced portfolio has nothing to do with avoiding loss. It's purely about maximising growth. Such a portfolio, in the long run, outperforms all individual assets it is constructed from.

I agree with your general sentiment. My reasoning to get there is different:

I don't, for example, think anyone should invest all their capital into a risky asset. Not because it might crash, but because it performs poorly compared to the best investment (which is a balance weighted toward safe assets.)
Fair amount of linux centric domains as well. I wanted to get one, but my parents wouldn't let me send my passport to russia...
This maybe takes “identifying as an Apple user” a bridge too far!

And really, who’s going to know (how) to do that, especially in an emergency? It also relies on either your phone or watch surviving an accident intact. It’s your life, but it’s just going to frustrate identification attempts when it’s important.

A wallet doesn’t have to be bulky a to hold a couple of cards or a few slips of paper. I have a cardholder which is much more minimal and compact than a standard wallet, and even Apple makes cardholders that attach to the back of MagSafe phones now.
That's pretty much what it was like when I was with their AppleCare group. During the hiring process, I was fully expecting a drug test (that never came).
This is actually a more interesting release. Though it would be more interesting if it were for the M1 kernel.
It doesn't have much significance. Apple does this for all (major) macOS releases. macOS and iOS are built off of open source components, for which Apple releases the source code now and then. It's a courtesy for the most part - most of these are BSD licensed and therefore don't strictly require source code to be released.

These notably don't include much of mac/iOS proprietary user interface components, drivers, or system frameworks - basically everything that makes macOS/iOS remotely interesting. The source code drops are helpful for the creation of other Unix-like operating systems based on the open source macOS kernel (see also the defunct Open/PureDarwin projects), and the released apps are sometimes ported (e.g. the GnuStep project has some older version of Chess.app and others ported over). There's some off and on efforts in the FreeBSD community to port Apple's open source launchd init system [1]. All in all though, there's really not all that much interest in reusing the code from these code drops by the open source community and any efforts seem to lack staying power.

The released source most practical value is most likely derived by researchers investigating macOS/iOS internals and being able to inspect the source code for some of it. As a curiosity it looks like you're able to build and run your own XNU kernel on macOS [2] (what is this, Linux?), but I can't personally attest to the process.

[1]: e.g. https://github.com/freebsd/openlaunchd

[2]: https://kernelshaman.blogspot.com/2018/12/building-xnu-for-m...
There are federations whose capital is part of a state or a state itself. Did this problem occur anywhere in practice?
Looks like BBVA is shutting down all of its "startup bank" acquisitions? Simple is also shutting down today.
Just FYI, your "Airteam" overlaps "Case studies" when page width is under 1080px :)
3. A whole lot of free storage, so most people don't have to worry about needing to delete old emails.
How did people buy bitcoins back in 2011? Did you have to send a check to the seller?
They were talking about competitive advantage on hiring and retaining good people, I think.
I don't think the argument is if bicycle helmets are good or bad, but rather bicycle helmet laws. You can be for wearing a helmet at all times and still against bicycle helmet laws. Much the same way you can be for the legalization of drugs but not be a drug user yourself.
> I'm still retyping stuff from stack overflow instead of copying. I find it really effective to really think through the code you're borrowing from somewhere

Numerical Recipes in C. Had the hard copy but not the disk.

Often the code was just to obscure to work out as you typed, but there was some real value to typing it in. You got some real feel for it. Additionally it offered hard lessons in writing test cases.
Sounds like you're agreeing with me? By "lineage" I'm talking primarily about the lineage of a gene, or in many cases the so-called inclusive fitness of an individual.
This book was terrific and restored my faith in Javascript.
If you don't know CSS, you're not a web designer and have no business building websites to begin with. You can't design properly for a medium which has limitations you don't understand.
I really enjoy npm and think it is a great way to handle node.js modules.
Here's the Ferranti Mk 1 (the successor to the Manchester Mk 1, which was in turn the successor to the SSEM) which was the first commercially available computer playing a medley of songs: http://www.digital60.org/media/mark_one_digital_music/
cthullu worsip is ?

SQL, REX, MUMPS, dos bat
I disagree on both the specific and the general points.

General: The idea of separating presentation from content is useful in some contexts (including much of the web) where you need to be able to pour the content into multiple different containers. In other contexts, particularly the design of physical objects, presentation and content should be tightly connected. (You use the example of a booklet, but a booklet should be designed in a way that's well adapted to its use, and its use will depend on its content. There's no one-size-fits-all ideal booklet design.)

Specific: Even if you do want to learn to better separate content from presentation, learning the box model, or the different kinds of positioning, won't help in any but the narrowest way. There's no reason to learn CSS unless you're designing for a context that renders CSS. CSS has too many intricacies and perversions to be valuable in the abstract.
We're a startup here in Australia and we use Java extensively.
It has been trickier to use than PHP but the extra effort has allowed us to produce a very sophisticated system.
I take it "they had it coming" is an implicit agreement that you are indeed trolling?

As whiskeyjack already said, if you believe there was code stolen, go ahead and prove it. The source repositories of both projects are publicly available, feel free to show examples of code that was "stolen".

If not, please do move along and stop tarring the image of the Mojolicious project and the Perl community at large with your senseless childish behaviour. The Perl community is better than this. We don't need in-fighting.
I was just thinking to change from opera (that I love since forever) to ff4 because of the tab-candy feature. I tried, but I missed so much the features I got used to, like mouse-gestures, notes, downloads, quickstart thumbnails, no slowdowns...

Finally opera, again, has everything I need, and this tab management actually feels so much more usable and faster then ff.

Thanks Opera!
The saddest part about that article is the_ut / Stephen Watt getting a two year sentence for writing a _packet-sniffer_. Lets round up everyone who writes software that might somehow be used by criminals someday!

He should have just written a tcpdump filter. Oh, and he should have listen to _everyone_ telling him segvec was a fed.
I agree that we should pay teachers better. For the vast majority of school districts, teachers are not paid their value compared to the responsibility/influence they hold.
Anything by Bruce Frantzis. He has written several excellent books and I believe he also has (more expensive) DVDs.
"As a matter of professional courtesy, I decline to answer questions about specific policies of previous employers. Your client should be able to appreciate this, considering that a few years from now it will be their trust that I am protecting."
"One in seven?! rtm, you jerk! Why seven?"

Excerpted from the book Cyberpunk: Outlaws and Hackers on the Computer Frontier (published 1991). The quoted speaker is Paul Graham.
I used xmlrpc for this exact purpose (desktop to 'web service' - now there's a buzzword I haven;t heard in 5 years!) early this year, it was awesome. On the server side I had PHP's simple xml api, which also made pretty much all of the pain of parsing xml go away.
I've noticed a disturbing trend for some of the larger recruitment agencies in London to insist on knowing your salary. They've refused to pass on my CV without it. Worse, they claim it's the HR departments who are driving this, but that's plainly false - I've asked several very senior HR people and they've never heard of an HR department requiring current salary details along with CVs.

I suspect that the agencies are aggressively trying to gather valuable salary data, for their own purposes.
Entropy checkers are based on a faulty premise and are always at a disadvantage compared to the state of the art in password cracking. Online security would be in a better place if they had never been invented at all.

The only way to guarantee the entropy of a passphrase is to generate it from a source of high quality randomness (e.g. a CSPRNG or by actually rolling dice, hence the name "Diceware"). Diceware-style passphrases simply balance this requirement with usability by optimizing for things humans are typically good at memorizing (strings of words).
holy hell that is one of the most fun multiplayer game I played!

would love to know more about the engine and development process.

this is what games should be. just hop in and play. no bullshit sign in with your facebook or earn dumb achievements or buy textured guns for money etc.
It's actually featured on the front page! Looks like twitch is branching out.
That is a very sexist comment.
Speaking as a male, I find the idea of killing another human utterly repellent.
1. You can make this as complex/simple as you want.
2. The negotiation is simple, if you "think" you are worth "x" salary (by believing things like 'I will bring these xyz virtues to the table for abc company'), just let the company know in a polite and unemotional fashion.
3. This usually works for me. Best of luck !
I assume English isn't your first language, so this is my attempt to correct. Please don't take this as a criticism, but rather as (hopefully) helpful feedback. Even with English as my native language, I'm sure there's some grammar mistake I've made as well.

____

What if I told you that the software banks are using to transfer money has passwords hardwired inside, has to be run as administrator, has some command injection problems, etc.? Sadly companies think of security as a cost and to maximize their profit, they let people who should never even approach a keyboard write insecure programs because they cost less. Because testing is also expensive, it's the same story. Did a big airplane manufacturer do the same? Their customers? Who makes the decision often doesn't care. They prefer to spend more money to purchase a scapegoat, or a "silver bullet" appliance, so that they can say, "Hey, we had all of the countermeasures, but hackers know black magic!". I don't want to burn out. I prefer to give the correct information to the people that want to listen and then hope for a better company in the future.

____
The price does also play a role. Learning tools and frameworks takes a lot of time, and if it's not a free tool then if you change jobs or even departments you might find yourself unable to get a license. If you want to work on stuff at home, you need to pay. If you want to run a test server you need a license. Some tools are better than others in that regard, but it's basically why I would always choose learning a slightly worse free option than a paid option.
Yes, it's a sad story. I worked at BrickLink shortly after he died and the company was acquired, and helped port some of his code to Java. It was all very dense ASP (classic, not ASP.net!) and SQL Server stored procedures. It was written perfectly for what it was: the product of one person's passion, one person's mind.

He did lots of little simple things, like just delete all data after 30-days. This decision alone saved an incredible amount of complexity (and was charmingly naive).

I've always been a minimalist myself, but I'd never seen minimalism taken so far. This was a very active, very data-intensive webapp that served the whole world basically running on two machines. It was a the webapp version of that 'aha' moment you get when you see what someone can do with 1k or 10k of code in code golf or the demoscene. We all pay a very heavy price for collaborating on software!
Having done enough maintenance programming its safe to say that lots of developers manage to add complexity in to what should be fairly simple systems.

Yes a debugger is necessary for debugging a system that has been written by someone else.
If they were going to completely give up anything related to their career then yes but that wasn't what was described in the post - nor do I think retirement these days tends to mean "stop working". I think we're mostly past that notion since quite a few people live so long and desire fulfillment through jobs. (And jobs don't break your body as frequently as they used to)

After interacting with some people with FU money, they don't tend to give up on career very easily. They don't want to be stuck at home - they want to keep doing stuff. So, inevitably, they keep working, doing startups, taking on executive roles at big companies after they realize they suck at startups (like most people - obviously)... because that's what they know best and feel most useful for. From the people I know, once someone whose identity relies on being a provider suddenly no longer has to work to provide... they tend to have a bit low of satisfaction unless they keep working. So they work even though they don't need to because it gives them a bit more purpose/happiness/whatever.
I try to remind myself that it is in the last part of a project (the 80% effort that appears only giving 20% of the result) that I truly learn something.

Not finishing projects is a really bad habit, even for side-projects. Try to set a goal of at least publishing your project in some meaningful form - maybe it is just a blog or a forum posting.

Also be careful of vetting your ideas before you start. Make notes, paper prototypes, drawings or something that allows you to better reflect on and filter your ideas.
We have over 200gb of storage. Mostly image files.
Removing a single character is hardly worth the issues that may arise from not using it. The only quasi-acceptable use of '==' IMHO is:

myVar == null

as it is a little easier than:

myVar === undefined || myVar === null

That said, I use only '===' as I don't want to ever worry about my code (plus, the use of a maybe monad makes this and other problems go away).
Minor nitpick: his name is spelled "Elon".
I'm with you, everyday I try to fix a bug, make a small refactory or even improve README.

(https://www.dropbox.com/s/v5czzto5zfzz7rw/Screenshot%202014-...)
Thanks for all the ideas. For now we are going to route traffic via cloud front and set cache to almost never expire. We've also compressed images and it looks good so far.
The "lowest" end of the CPUs that the OP discusses are low end desktop/laptop parts. Furthermore, the biggest criticism of the author isn't the feature disabling per se, but how inconsistently Intel applies it across their overall performance bins. For example, the lack of TXT support in high end i7 parts when its there for middle tier i5 parts. Why the i7-3990K has VT-d and the i7-3770K doesnt(which really should just be distinguished by their clock/cache/TDP).
This is pretty awesome. The trade-offs between the two optimized versions of Graham's scan and Jarvis' march are pretty interesting too, based on the number of points that lie on the hull.
The best, strongest interpretation of PG's essay merits far less charity than even exists in this thread. There is barely anything of substance in the whole piece, and the parts that are substantive are just so far out of line with the empirical data we have regarding this issue as to be baffling coming from somebody with the cache of PG. If I were not being "charitable" I'd use words like "peurile," "ignorant," "transparent demagoguery," and "thoroughly irrational." In the interest of being charitable, I'd simply describe the essay as being merely a master work on how to write a series of unsubstantiated assertions interleaved with assertions that have already been thoroughly debunked.

This doesn't even touch on the incredibly un-"charitable" opening to PG's essay, on which he explicitly casts opponents or those who might disagree with him as being anti-immigrant. There is no way to "charitably" interpret that sentiment in a positive way. It is purely negative and entirely unworthy of a person claiming to be interested in honest intellectual discussion.
Why do I have to subscribe to a service to not receive spam?

The fact that the service exists is evidence of the problem.

Canada's anti spam law just went into effect for email, companies can't (see arent supposed to) just email you out of the blue anymore, why can't this apply to snail mail as well?

I think the answer is because the postal service survives on the revenue they get from stuffing your mail box with garbage, but I assert that's not a good enough reason. If they can't keep themselves afloat without the spam. I question whether they need to exist at all in the age of free webmail accounts and the ability to run your own server.
You mean C-like programming languages? It's pretty easy to learn a language shallowly when it is similar to everything else.
> Conclusion: We should avert the risk of breaking the device by breaking the device

You break a handful intentionally so you don't have to risk breaking hundreds of thousands unintentionally.
Hello Qiu Shifu, hello world.Do you know? We appeared to be cool and smart when we first met. The truth is, we are both childish and stupid (in a good way). We do not know each other for very long, but we get use to each other faster than light. We think alike. We have similar minds. We know what the other wants without much asking. We make fun of each other. We make fun of the blockchain. We make fun of the world. Yes, you and me are fun-making-massive-attacks terrorists. Who are you? I remember you elegantly spilled strawberry milk out of your mouth on a bullet train from Shanghai to Beijing like my young sister. You asked me to conduct pyramid schemes with your twinkling big beautiful eyes. You encouraged me to travel to India and North Korea like a Hajid encouraging his fellows. You and me climbed up the tallest chimney in 798 factory trembling like a spring chicken. You woke me up and asked me to run with you and enjoyed Jian Bing Guo Zi for breakfast. You are so abnormal, and I enjoy doing all these with you. What are you? You are a very smart thinker and you are smart enough to do anything be it investing to marketing. You dreamt about being an artist and I think I will be your broker. You are always full of beautiful passion and dreams about the world and I wish they will all come true. No, they are coming true. You are so cute, and I think nothing else can be even as close to your cuteness.Your eyes are more beautiful than the most beautiful lakes. I do not only want to stand on the tip of your nose and dive into the water, I want to be the pisces that swim in the water forever, one fish in each of your eyes. Out of the water, I die. Here and now, on this Ethereum Block, I am ledgering on the network just to tell the entire world how lucky I am to have found the most astonishingly adorable woman since I am a very normal grown man with barely basic programming skills. You fascinate and inspire me. You influence me for the better. You re the on my top list, you are the objective of my objective, like an angel that rescued my stupid lonely soul in David Tao s songs; and at the same time like a cult religious leader running pyramid scheme that takes my ass for sacrafice and I can never say no, and instead I recklessly offer you my properties, passion and love. For every minute that I have been with you, it is full of happiness and joy. Can I have so more of this in the rest of my time? More minutes, more hours, more days, and even years? There is only one solution to that problem. You, be mine. O shifu
Good point and one we are also thinking about.

I can't imagine a reason for Apple to reject such a framework, since it is really only basic socket connections with a bit of additional logic. They can't take sockets away from developers.
No recommendations for the first 5 movies I entered. Looks a bit to generic and mainstream to me.
I think this might be where the disconnect is. If you think up solutions and translate them into code, then I can certainly imagine the translating part could be very boring. That's the 1960s model of software development (still going strong in some quarters, of course).

Programmers think up solutions in code. If you stick with it you'll probably eventually come to realise this.
Sure. People were asserting that the second chris lattner left google, see https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22161780
That blackberry is an insane (kind of scary) species. It grows so fast and has immortal roots that will just sprout up somewhere else. Huge thorns to protect itself from animals and people, delicious big berries to help it propagate. How do you even try to outcompete that as a plant?
I once worked at a company that, when they did sprint planning, counted a day as 4 hours, that is to say if you said a ticket would take 4 hours you were saying it would take a day. Which means that any 8 hour day was half not coding.
Yes but I can all but guarantee you that humans aren't swimming where there have been known orca sightings.
I turn happiness into code, but require more minerals.
You had something like this during the European partitioning of Africa into colonial Empires. Africa was known as the “white man’s graveyard” due to various tropical diseases. In the end, for the most part, technology won, and Europe carved up Africa into various colonial Empires.
Well you could also build your web startup in a compile-to-JS language and barely ever touch JS, and you’d also be fine, right? (Maybe in rare cases for interop, debug, etc)

At any rate you’re right - the dominance of each language for their respective use cases (JS-Web / Py-ML) emanates from different sources.