jkeisling/hacker-news-corpus-2007-2022 huggingface dataset:
Thanks for checking the page out buddy!
Have a look at http://www.testdome.com

We have approached creating our content to be as work-relevant as possible. Our front-end questions address all the areas you mentioned.

Disclaimer: I'm co-founder of TestDome.
Try tcptraceroute for comparison. Or you can eg, open up Wireshark, make a real connection and look at the relative times on packets for a real connection. Ping gives you a starting point, usually "best case".
There's no fundamental reason why buyer's agents have to be a part of the house-buying process, they certainly aren't over here in the UK - houses are publicly advertised by the seller's real estate agent, and the buyer and seller hire solicitors relatively cheaply to handle all the contractual stuff.

Oh, and I have a feeling that many of those hard-working buyer's agents are probably less hard-working if the buyer is black, since this has been a long-running issue.
You need to actually look at how piano rolls work in a DAW. The twelve semitones are all equally spaced.
You might want to look at what DDflow [0] can do, in regards to handling emission/retraction.

If you figure out how this would work in the context of DDflow, let us know. This sounds very interesting.

[0]: https://github.com/TimelyDataflow/differential-dataflow
> Could you elaborate on this? I'd say repl based interactive programming is one of julia's greatest strengths, and avoiding the repl is probably setting yourself up for pain.

With REPL you have an invisible global state, can't reproduce what you have done, changes earlier in code path don't propagate to results, you don't have documentation of what you did.

It's for me really like trying to write a book by dictating. Except that you're dictating to somebody who's gonna give an independent summary of it to a third party and never gonna write down what you dictated. It boggles my mind how people can work like this, but they probably get hooked to REPL from the first tutorials and just don't know better.

I'll look into DaemonMode.jl. Not a fan of using a daemon (and I'm guessing there will be problems with e.g. interactive plots), but in the short term I'll take anything that could make Julia programming tolerable.
People are vastly underselling the risk associated with remote work. As someone who works with remote workers and developers from the developing world, the idea that companies can just outsource all of this work is a bit of a pipe dream, at least now.
My biggest issue with music theory is how the numbers used in names make no sense:

"octave" sounds like 8, however it doubles frequency (x2) and is divided in 12 semitones.

"major third" sounds like 3, but involves 4 semitones and a ratio of 5:4

etc...
What is the argument for it that entitles anyone to cut the line?
The “all or nothing” approach many states has built is extremely foolish, yes, but that isn’t inherently part of an approach based on prioritization.

You can prioritize for the sickest while simultaneously optimizing for all doses being used.
You can navigate to the "Network Log" tab in the "Firewall" screen and search to see which app made connections to the IP address you see resolved in the DNS logs.
If it’s a government service (like power and water in many cases), that’s why freedom of speech as a right exists - to protect you from government retaliation for speech. For mobile connectivity and internet, similar rules apply if the service is a common carrier which recognizes the fact that while private, these organizations operate as government-allowed monopolies.

For groceries, that’s a private business. If you run into a grocery store and cause a scene or do something the owner doesn’t like the owner can remove you. There are fairly narrow exceptions to this, such as how you can’t usually be discriminated against for being a member of a protected class.

Freedom of Speech in the US was never designed to protect you from other people, it was designed to protect you from the government.
The I/O cost would be more than any loot you find !.

Jokes apart, it is not easy even for Google in-house teams such a query scanning all their drive folders would be very, very expensive computationally.

Most files are stored as binary blobs, i.e. bin formats like PDF etc with some level of compression. Retrieval costs and file read costs for even most common formats can be expensive and slow
How in the world is that better than automated testing? Rather than being sure that a feature didn't break, you're taking the chance that you or a beta user is going to hit the bug and report it back correctly.
well a decent hosting provider such as hetzner provide that service to all their customers. https://www.hetzner.com/unternehmen/ddos-schutz

Being using them for many years, way better and cheaper than AWS.
I think this is a little different - it's "doing the math." The best contemporary example I think is early/frequent mammograms/checks for prostate cancer. If we check how often what we can detect will develop into a threat to health, and compare that to the consequences of treatment at that early stage, we may determine that under some conditions the results of our diagnostics kill more people than the disease would, and therefore we shouldn't do them.

That's different than not treating people at all - even if it's not treating people at all, because the reason you're not doing it is because your diagnostics and treatments are inadequate.
...they'll wait until you get drunk (i.e. roofied) at a bar, then kidnap and torture you until you give them all your money. The "red" budget is even more fun than the black budget. Choosing to defy the state is choosing to defend oneself forever against the creepy-crawlies the state pays to notice such defiance.
Their estimation tool does not seem to load, but I appreciate the attempt to make something you can play around with: https://food4healthylife.org/

Not having an alcohol consumption category seems a bit odd for this sort of thing.
For China it is. The US seems to have been under the impression for the last couple decades that geopolitics don’t exist anymore.

On that note, if TSMC’s technical supremacy isn’t a core part of Taiwan’s national security strategy I’d be shocked - whatever else the US may think about Taiwan & China, the fact that our entire electronic infrastructure relies on TSMC in some form or fashion ensures we have a deep and serious ongoing commitment to their independence from our chief geopolitical rival.
Right now the press is fuelling a frenzy over Russian troops, trumpeting "eminent war!!" daily. It is rediculius, completely unfounded, incendiary, false, and just plain dumb...but clicks matter.
You note that the interface accepts a lot more words than are in the dictionary, much like the normal Wordle game. I wonder if you can exploit the full set of acceptable words to narrow down the possibility space even further? I would not be surprised if there's an equation in the full set that performs better than the equation you initially selected.
This shows a terribly naive view of Microsoft and what it takes to run anything.
Dupe of http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1438255, but I think it is worth another look in light of a few things:

1. Advances in web application technology like HTML5, Sproutcore, and so forth.

2. New "platforms" like smart phones, tablets, and ebook readers where Microsoft doesn't dominate.

3. Getting back to point #1, the possibility that nobody uses desktop applications, where by "nobody," I mean "fewer than 10,000,000 people," to borrow Joel's phrase.
Sure, so there were a lot of them that we compiled, here are the ones and topics I remember.

Protocol: we used a custom psuedo-TCP protocol built on UDP based on libjingle from Google (used in Google Talk): http://code.google.com/apis/talk/libjingle/file_share.html. Libjingle's filesharing itself was a decent resource for learning some P2P stuff as well.

NATing and routing: we used Skype's UDP hole punching: http://www.h-online.com/security/features/How-Skype-Co-get-r....

Skype configures each install to be a supernode by default and then disables it based on certain criteria (low speeds, behind a NAT/firewall, etc.). Discovery of other network nodes is an entire subject unto itself and a lot of other network discovery protocols are well documented; our system used a central server to track up-time statistically and map clients to one another based on finding a good fit. Happy to answer any questions here or at my e-mail address in profile.
This article makes the specious assumption that if all the world ran Linux, free software would reign. Currently, the dominant Linux culture is a self-selected group of FLOSS fanatics. If all the world ran Linux, those people would be just as much a minority of Linux users as Linux users are of the total PC-using populace.

It isn't as though people lack options for free software on today's popular operating systems — they just generally choose to use commercial software.
In the words of Terry Pratchett:

"I save about twenty drafts -- that's ten meg of disc space -- and the last one contains all the final alterations. Once it has been printed out and received by the publishers, there's a cry here of 'Tough shit, literary researchers of the future, try getting a proper job!' and the rest are wiped."
CDs lose the CDDA label if they don't comply to the Red Book standard. This was done in the dark years ~2002-2004 a lot when the media right exploitation industry tried to "protect their market". In Germany (only?) people started calling them Un-CDs.
If you account for inflation, it has actually moved down :)
> when "specialist weapons" (e.g. tanks and airplanes of the 20th century) become the pinnacle of weapons tech.

I will certainly agree with that, in the sense that the idea that armed civilians (even if they have some automatic assault rifles) posing an internal threat to a modern, well equipped military; is laughable, and is likely advanced for disingenuous propaganda purposes.
"A malicious container running on a Docker-run host is deployed and ran"

A most relevant question being, how does this "malicious container" get onto the host in the first place?
I thought about this as well for a long time and a friend just switched from academy to the industry.

She does math and statistics and stuff; She said she is fed up of writing papers with or without real usecases; Reproducability and co.

She also is now regretting the low salary and her not having much of savings due to it.

I gave myself a new goal instead: making as much money in a normal ethical way as possible, exiting with 50 and then doing what i want without pressure.

Perhaps i will write code or will do something totally different.
Here you go: https://www.danheld.com/blog/2019/1/5/pow-is-efficent
> In many countries you cannot hire someone without paying them even if they agree to work for free and the same should apply to software.

In those countries, am I permitted to shovel my neighbor’s sidewalk or mow their lawn? Can I help a friend paint a room or change a tire? Am I permitted to write a poem and share it for free? Can I publish scientific findings that I might have created?

> If you embrace open source you are actually helping big companies getting free labour.

I see it as “Yes, and:” We are helping all humans avoid the tedium and drudgery of solving now-pointless problems because they have already been solved, avoid introducing novel security bugs, and overall to help us collectively stand on the shoulders of giants rather than on the toes.

That does help large companies avoid creating a bunch of tedious, pointless, repetitive work which humans would have to forfeit large chunks of their lives solving. That sounds like a feature rather than a bug to me.

It also helps small companies afford to offer tech-based solutions and to better utilize the constrained pool of “people who are good at programming”.
Glad that you like it! I'm part of the (small) team working on ListenBrainz. If you have any feedback or feature requests, I'd be happy to hear it.

My email is me [at] param.codes.
What's wrong with people giving rides for money? That's ideal model of open market IMO. I have this model applied in my country and 5 kilometers taxi ride would cost around 1-2 euros, depending on time (bus costs 0.4 euro). That's nice for customers, if you ask me. There's other side of the coin, it might not be safe enough to ride with unknown driver at night being in unconscious state. But we have public taxi services with slightly higher prices for that.

I was at Spain in my vacation and transportation costs shocked me, TBH.
I've always associated the name with "posterity" (though the post/poster association is also apparent) and taken that as a cue for pronunciation.
I successfully ported a number to Callcentric before GrandCentral became GV. After GC -> GV, the number magically returned to GV, which is fine by me with the improved feature set.
Interesting. I'm on 10.6.3. I'm also using the 64-bit kernel, which isn't the default. I wonder if one or both of these variables accounts for the difference.
Could also be referring to things like Xen, I suppose
It looks to me like Larrabee's successor is is going after the high-performance computing market, not the server market. Why else would they devote so much die area to having loads of wide floating-point SIMD units?
Yea, scam. Do the math and you realize its a scam. Theres been posts on this over a year ago. Think about it. At 1 cent increments if bidding itself costs 1 cent. By the time the price reaches 100 bucks you already made 100 dollars in bids along. But bidding usually costs 5 cents per 1 cent bid so you already made 500 dollars on a 100 dollar auction + 100 dollars for sale.
Your fees look much lower than last I looked (I also seem to recall I had to contact someone at Braintree to get rates last time I was shopping...I don't think it was prominent on the website as it is now). Anyway, I take it back, Braintree does appear to be competitive with PayPal Payments Pro and others.
Not sure if it's 100% relevant, but this was a fun/semi-informative read on shorting stocks:

http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/8.04/dumb.html
When I hear someone say they want to be filthy rich, I hear it as them saying they want to be a boring douche bag.

To each his/her own? Maybe the guy just isn't that interesting and would rather make money.
I understand that the use of aircrafts in WW2 was incredibly high, but I would have thought maybe 1 person survived a free fall and lived, not 6(recorded on that site). Thanks for sharing that.
For a humorous look at what happens if we assume correlation causes causation there's Spurious Correlations: http://www.tylervigen.com/

My favorite: "Number people who drowned by falling into a swimming-pool correlates with Number of films Nicolas Cage appeared in"

With enough variables and noise you'll find things that correlate if you look hard enough. Without experiments where you control one thing and observe the other it's hard to demonstrate causation.
And generally more blunt about it, certainly.
GAE still uses the same model - the prices just are more than they were previously. See my previous link and [1] for details. It even explicitly gives you an instance/hour cost (above the free quota).

Plenty of PAASs do autoscaling.

[1] https://cloud.google.com/appengine/pricing
This well-illustrated post is technically about the core Synod agreement protocol in Paxos. Building a consistent distributed service on top requires additional scaffolding and infrastructure. Typically, people layer on a system that implements a "replicated state machine (RSM)" on top, which maintains the illusion of a single consistent object, even though it is composed of distributed replicas.

Also keep in mind that Raft, Zab, and View-Stamped replication (in reverse chronological order) are alternatives to the Synod protocol in Paxos. These protocols differ from Paxos by employing a different leader-election mechanism and slightly different way of maintaining their invariants.

There have been many Paxos variants. This site [1] shows the various Paxos variants over a timeline and points out their contributions.

Those of you interested in building replicated state machines using Paxos should take a look at OpenReplica [2]. It is a full Multi-Paxos implementation that takes any Python object and makes it distributed and fault-tolerant, like an RPC package on steroids.

[1] http://paxos.systems/

[2] http://openreplica.org/faq/
Having turned 32 this year, I can relate with all of your points.

Make life as simple as possible ("simplicity is the ultimate sophistication"). Use paper when necessary.

Also, try hard not to multi-task. It's been proven the human brain isn't built to handle it.
"The Rise of Nintendo: A Story in 8 Bits"
http://grantland.com/features/the-rise-of-nintendo-video-gam...

Also a book on the history of Word Perfect showing how a software company was run in the 80s http://www.wordplace.com/ap/
This is something I am constantly trying to get better at.

I have recently started using jrnl: http://jrnl.sh

I really like it because you can export it any many formats which I think would come in handy later to import the data, say a database. I always like the idea of a flat file for right now so you can ack/grep on the command line.

The cons are not great for assets such as images.

Looking forward to reading some other solutions.
>That's true; on the ATMega32u4 it's the 2.5kb of RAM

I blame arduino, 70Mips >40KB ram STM32/dsPIC is same price, but teach sheep arduino and they will only know arduino.
This reminds me of Alexander Grothendieck (Fields Medal 1966), who resigned from one of the most prestigious French maths positions (IHES) on ethical grounds. He now lives on reclusion (or the exact opposite of it), as far as is known.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grothendieck
In almost every case, you'll be able to install your own EFI modules, including a shell -- I haven't seen an implementation yet where you couldn't. It's amazing how much flexibility you have with compliant EFI implementations.
While they're often linked, it's important to remember the distinction between "Simple Codebase" and "Simple to Use". The latter is much more important in most cases than the first, and sometimes it can take very complex code to make something as simple as possible for the user.

The simpler something to use, the bigger the pool. The fewer the applicable use cases, the smaller the pool.
I've seen it work well when an existing relationship exists between the company doing the outsourcing and the programmers being outsourced to.

In our case, we have some Russian programmers working for us. They used to be permanent employees here, but have since moved back to Russia. The quality is known (high), and deadlines are met.

However, whenever any of the big outsourcing companies have been involved it has always been a disaster: More expensive than local when the project finally reaches completion (that's if it does), incredibly variable rates of quality, poor communication, continual programmer attrition.
I just made a poor quality one of these with plain old paper and aluminium foil. My iwlist scan results:

Frequency:2.437 GHz (Channel 6)

Before: Quality=40/70 Signal level=-70 dBm

After: Quality=47/70 Signal level=-63 dBm

Not very exciting, but not bad. Lots of access points in my block make connectivity a real problem, so I'll take whatever I can get.

My roughly-cut parabolic reflector isn't super-parabolic, make of that what you will: maybe a better shape would be markedly better, maybe it means yours doesn't have to be perfect either shrug

My tips if you want to try yourself: tape the tabs in place but try not to put creases into the foil when you do. If it's not already clear, only put foil on the back reflector (not the curved support)
On the same page of the cutout design (http://www.freeantennas.com/projects/template2/index.html) there is what the author of the post call a "scary graph". Looks like a cool Windows based signal monitor thing. Does anyone know it?
Because you asked: I did not initially downvote your comment. However, as the asker of the question, I understood the phrase "Apple's term for RTM" was just a compact way of saying, "the term used by Apple for the concept some others call RTM". I did not detect any implication in that wording that "Golden Master" was uniquely or primarily or even originally Apple's term.

But you read those more specific implications into the statement. Out of two ways to read the answer, you chose the less-charitable interpretation: that the writer was making a stronger claim, and misleading people. In that sense, I can understand downvotes as trying to send the message: read charitably, assume the best-possible-interpretation of comments, and save your corrections/clarifications for things that are wrong under all interpretations, not just one strict interpretation. Otherwise we get crazy meta-tangents like this.

Finally, though, the 'dispute' (such as there is one) motivated me to actually read the Wikipedia article and Google ["golden master"] on both the web and old Usenet postings. It turns out the phrase is overwhelmingly associated with Apple, and perhaps Apple was the first to use exactly that term for a software release, in the late 80s. So the implication that it is an Apple-originated term may be appropriate, despite you having heard the term in other software contexts.
Risk.Ident | VISA, ONSITE | Scala Developer | Hamburg, Germany | Relocation

Risk Ident is a software provider that offers anti-fraud solutions to companies within the e-commerce, telecommunications and financial sectors.

Some of the technologies we use: Scala, Python, ML, JavaScript, Postgres, Ansible, MongoDB, Elasticsearch, Kafka.
We have openings to work across our engineering teams.

Apply at https://riskident.com/en/jobs/ or email me directly.
I wouldn't, because he/she is blind. And I wouldn't describe him the flat picture I took, I would tell a story that includes observations from other senses that they can relate to.

Your case is a picture is not content. It's exactly what it is in many contexts (photography, illustration, charts). When a picture is only website decoration, then you're right.
I'm not familiar with SEC regulations, but would putting the options for a pool of employees into a separate LLC or trust be enough to circumvent this 500 people rule? Or would all shareholders/beneficiaries be counted separate?
The frustrating thing about this is that you rarely ever hear about early employees getting filthy rich, even in HUGE companies.

This is why starting your own company and going for broke seems much more appealing, as having 10-20x what your first employees might have is really a game changer. Couple this with the fact that many first employees may end up doing much more work than the founders, and things can get really perplexing.
As I understand it, there's no long here; there's no other party promising to pay a certain amount for each share. They just bought options from the people who had them and in case of an IPO, there will be (hopefully) a cash fountain that the investors in this company get to tap into. And if the IPO turns out to be less than whatever they paid for the options, tough luck.

In other words, it seems like all assets are paid for already with the inlay of the shareholders of the investment vehicle. So I think that disqualifies it as a long, where no cash changes hands at the time the deal is done, no?
chromatic? Received your new book from Amazon yesterday. :-)

A really nice overview, I'll recommend it and not only for newbies.

(-: I'm ashamed to admit it as a non-native English speaker, but the few pages on Unicode is probably what will be most useful. :-)
Pro Tip: make sure you spell the subject's name correctly in your submission title. Matt Blaze, not Matt Balze.

edit: And it might help in this case to indicate why the link is interesting. Matt was asked by the RSA Conference organisers to provide his PowerPoint presentation. The second slide of the three-slide presentation that he provided is titled "I’m not using PowerPoint in my presentation."