jkeisling/hacker-news-corpus-2007-2022 huggingface dataset:
Yes, but then it'd be a deliberation between two holders rather than one holder and a non-holder.

I'm surprised there aren't many famous 'double' trademarks. The only one that springs to mind is Jif, the lemon juice, and Jif, the kitchen cleaner which were both household names in the UK. The kitchen cleaner renamed to Cif as part of a global brand realignment, though.
Jesus, now that we're done with all the pointless bickering about language, could someone provide a Zusammenfassung? I skimmed it, and saw nichts interessantes.
No one cares about all of HN. We just all care about different subsets. If you want your perfect community, you need to find enough people who care about exactly the same subset of articles as you to support the community and convince them to become a part of it. Then you need to ruthlessly keep out anyone who has a slightly different subset, while making sure people don't leave the community or, for that matter, change their tastes.

Of course, your own tastes will change, so really you need to guide everyone else in the community to change their tastes right along with you so the community will continue to provide the aggregation you desire. Either that, or you'll have to convince or force old members to leave and new ones to come in that match your new interests.

In other words, you're asking for something which can't reasonably be expected to exist. The aggregator you want is you. Click on the articles that sound interesting. Ignore the ones that don't. You can't expect a community to perfectly support your personal, unique, and ever-changing tastes.
> Now of course email is approaching obsolescence as a communicative medium. Most people under the age of 30 think of email as an outdated mode of communication used only by “old people”. In its place they text, and some still post to Facebook. They attach documents, photos, videos, and links to their text messages and Facebook posts the way people over 30 do with email.

This is silly and disconnected from reality. My generation knows e-mail is ubiquitous. E-mail is seen as necessary for professional communications and everyone from the "millennial" generation realizes that once they get to college.

I'm not going to text my professor or potential employer let alone contact him or her on Facebook (which I barely use anymore), when I can use the convenience of e-mail. Not only does it look more professional, but it keeps the correspondence intact within a time stamped thread.
There's already a beta version (diff author) up at nixsrv.com
Play store says it is not compatible with any devices
And apparently Cobol is coming back from the dead
Anti-maskers mostly don't acknowledge COVID as a risk. Valve-wearers do acknowledge that COVID is a risk, but choose to disregard others' health anyway. One is dumb, but the other is malicious.
> I had upholstery on the backs of the rear seats (the part that
> becomes the floor of the hatchback when you fold them down) all
> off on my Ford C-Max. It looks like an adhesive failure there.

The wife's Focus has the same issue.
Check out Wasm3 which is the fastest WebAssembly interpreter, and since they recently adopted Cosmopolitan it's now the most universal one too. https://twitter.com/wasm3_engine/status/1354699030165676033 Cosmopolitan is designed to be complementary to visions like yours. If you believe bytecode is the future then Cosmopolitan can help your vision be successful by giving it the best performance and portability across PCs and servers.
https://twitter.com/JackMallers/status/1346867753253220356
just put in mine: [redacted] (its a security setting for our other documents) - sorry about that
please quote the part talking about dupes there?
That particular optimization is unlikely but there have been C compilers that optimized struct layout.

179.art, one of the SPEC2000 benchmarks, has some poorly laid out structs. Sun introduced targeted optimizations for this benchmark and several other vendors also did so. I have also read papers about profile-guided struct reordering but don't have a citation on hand.

GCC also had a pass[0] for this optimization but it may have been removed.

[0] https://www.research.ibm.com/haifa/dept/_svt/papers/golovane...
It should matter if he's curious what pool you've sampled yourself from.
Coinbase is also down, but that’s hardly a surprise
Virtually every private pension system in the United States has been stopped for the reason that they are not actuarially sound. The reason for this is that population is not growing steadily as the model predicts. The baby boom was an anomaly that will wreck the system.

The major reason that US car companies struggled so much over the last decade is that they are saddled with pensions that foreign car manufacturers are not (e.g. Toyota). They sold as many cars, but their profit per car was less because of pension obligations to workers no longer producing for the company.
I'm sure there's an innocent explanation! Maybe he was performing some "hands-on" research? :-P
Be sure to read the original article too

http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2010/12/news-break-fda-est...

Oh and vegitarians can't escape this either, even in food from "organic" farms.

Liquid manure from the livestock is used on the crops and the antibiotics gets into other food that way.
...which is still somewhat disturbing :P
> Fire the CEO unless they were mugged

People don't learn from mistakes if that's the response. They'll also hide their mistakes, making things worse. You want a CEO to report the loss ASAP, not cover it up. Having a "no fault" culture encourages people to quickly report mistakes.
> If you're still willing to support Trump or excuse his actions, you're a fascist

If you think this way, you're deranged. This is how religion starts. This is how wars start. If a war started, the righteous would not prevail. They rarely do. Wars almost always lead to autocracies. America was a rare exception. I guess that time may be coming to an end soon.
Which would be great IMO
But in the end it seems they didn't drop? Or are they just licensing a basic IP and building on top?

I remember the IMG stuff being full of bugs
Your underlying assumption is that companies where employees work more hours are more successful on the market place. I would say this is a deeply flawed assumption.
"more" in this context can mean "reach more locations" or "increase the bandwidth to existing locations". I'm not aware of bandwidth issues requiring much more than an update maybe once in 50-100 years. For example, where I live in rural NM, the houses around here presumably got paired telephone wires on the order of 50-100 years ago, and then within the last 10-15 years they got rewired with multi-twisted-pair cables that easily get to 50Mbps. While in 80 years that might not be considered sufficient, I doubt anyone will seriously suggest another round of recabling within that time frame.

But anyway, you really seem to be missing the fundamental point here: there is no limited "spectrum" for wiring in the sense of multiple possible parties who want to use "parts of it" for various purposes. If you assign the XMHz to YMHz band of the electromagnetic spectrum to some purpose, it's gone, it cannot be used for anything else, by anyone else, across a potentially vast geographic area. There's no equivalent for this in the context of digital (or analog) data moving down wires.
I started using WAL-E a couple days ago for one of my own sites.

WAL-E is a program that postgresql can use to push database changes to S3.

Depending on how you configure postgresql checkpoints, the most data you'd lose is somewhere between to a couple seconds to a minute. I'd assume Heroku would make it a couple seconds. The downside to more frequent backups is more storage space (each checkpoint (WAL archive) stored on S3 is a minimum of 75k or so, even if there weren't any changes).
> Unless you've actually started a company, this will sound like a bunch of crap.

My mom, with little more than a GED, started the business which fed me for most of my childhood. I cut the salary cord and tried to make a go of it myself at 24 years old, facing down much fear. I failed. It was fucking awesome and I'd change nothing.

So with that experience in mind: it's still sounding like crap, per my post above. I appreciate the celebration but would prefer to share it with many other kinds of people, not least of which the few decent people who made it their business to teach me important things.

There are many kinds of people in the world and this is hardly the most interesting razor to use to divide them up.
Parsing access logs in 2015? Really? You mean those logs that are cluttered with bot traffic and that only have IP addresses instead of real user sessions, and do not contain valuable information about for instance exit pages, banner clicks, page load times, and so on?
Proud, good, smug, bad.
Yes I did. I contributed the ability to listen on unix domain sockets, and it's been part of nginx since 0.8.
Completely wide open for developers = nobody is developing for it?

It's like my Google+ account ... wide open for my friends. Except none of them are on there.
Well, technically it's not inflation you should take into account, but a safe alternative investment, like government bonds. But that probably just makes things worse.
I've already started searching for other co-founder ( friends & Co.). I agree, raising money from the Users as a single co-founder can be a daunting task and even more for a Non-profit startup like mine. Henceforth, YC!
> Do you want to die?

IMHO this is the wrong question to ask. As long as you continue to age, and your body degrades, you'll eventually not object to dying any more, because living isn't much fun.

The much more interesting question is: do you want to age beyond a certain point?
His point appears to be VS is easier to use for people familiar to VS. If you have two developers equally unfamiliar to their respective development environments, VS and, say, ClojureBox (a Clojure+Emacs combo), their learning curves won't be that different.

Most probably, they will start with a book or something like that to learn the basics.
You think Google's mainline storage of their index is on disk?

It is to laugh. I don't think that's been true since around the time they stopped building server shelves out of lego or cardboard.

They've been keeping the full text of the web in RAM (for the snippets), with indexes, several times over. With independent live siblings in multiple datacenters.
In fairness, when you pay for cable you're paying for the distribution of the TV channels you watch. The programming itself is funded through ad revenue.

(Disclosure: I haven't had cable in about ten years.)
Block them then.
Anyone working on applications using this data?
The big banner announcing the lawsuit: Not so baffling.
old index:
problem: parts of the index were refreshed at a faster rate than others; the main layer would update every couple of weeks and to refresh a layer of the old index, Google would analyze the entire web first.
impact: there was a significant delay between when Google found a page and made it available to its users.

new index:
solution: caffeine, Google's new index will analyze the web in small portions and update its search index on a continuous basis, globally. As Google find new pages, or new information on existing pages, Google can add these straight to the index.
improvement: user can find fresher information than ever before—no matter when or where it was published.

recent changes in Google search result page suggested that the searched results appears to be categorized further to the different structured data. This could be inline with the rolling out Caffeine.
I don't get where that is broken.
Hallucinogens are often thought of as a way to cheat your way to mindfulness.

But really, they're more like a trailer or advertisement for mindfulness.

If you get lucky, you only need to take them once.
There are two job positions to join their team as well. I guess they could even use their own tool during a test interview.
I'd say this is why we need software to respect accessibility and configurability. We didn't need "Dark Mode" in Windows 95 because we could configure the crap out of our native widgets. Then using the web as an application platform became a thing, accessibility was jettisoned in the name of "muh design!" and all personal computing has suffered for it.
That's the best solution - improved privacy and sometimes even reduced gas prices when using cash.
The valuation of his companies doesnt translate to societal value necessarily. As much as i love Musk, Rockets and battery cars are aspirations. I d much rather he was leading a couple of biotech companies instead
I am a current mosh user too.

In mosh you can’t scroll backwards, due to how the implementation of mosh is made.

See https://github.com/mobile-shell/mosh/issues/774 and https://github.com/mobile-shell/mosh/issues/122

This has annoyed me for a long time so I am definitely going to give ET a shot.

As for the stuff about tmux I don’t know since I don’t use tmux.
Let's say you see some spam. You could have the software tell you which part of the web has made the spam trusted, and then you could manually mark that part of the web as untrusted. If there are only a few breaks in the chain like that, it'd be a workable solution.
I have been using Infinit from times to times and it never failed me. Could you tell us a bit more about your infrastructure ?
What's your explanation for it then? Microsoft explicitly admitted it was there for Windows to be "compliant" with NSA:

http://web.archive.org/web/20000520001558/http://www.microso...

"The keys in question are the ones that allow us to ensure compliance with the NSA's technical review."

Very clear. It was there because otherwise Windows wasn't compliant according to the NSA.

Then only thing NSA could worry about commercial products was the same that made Lotus to implement what we read here.

Ask Schneier if he would now, after Snowden, react the same as in 1999 while writing about it.
Now that you mention it, I wonder if this open-office culture - conditioning employees to accept little privacy in the workplace - was the reason the reprehensible "surveillance as a business model" became popular at so many tech companies.
Are you looking for something like https://www.tutum.co maybe?

Locally, you'd use http://www.fig.sh to describe and run your app. You can then import this description into Tutum and run it on e.g. DO or AWS.
Yeah, the terminology isn't well defined by the article. The X-15 is the fastest, manned, suborbital craft ever built.
The UK in the 70s had a tax rate of 95% thus encouraging payment of much higher salaries to make it worthwhile for talented staff. If the tax rate is thereafter lowered to something sensible then the differentials are going to be significant. Quite a number of higher earners now have an effective tax rate of 60% which is not exactly low - but that's in the UK.
The way I understood the story was that she didn't know what the problem with her hands was, but she called it RSI for lack of a better word. I didn't read that line as stating she was actually diagnosed with RSI.

But even if she had meant it that way, it's still presumptuous to claim a better posture would cure her.
Also one of those things that can be enjoyed by adults too - there are constantly small twists and jokes that fly right over the heads of the children.
This article is a bit old (26 November 2013), for recent news on reproducibility check the Reproducibility Initiative.

It's a movement by several companies and groups

Nature recently joined it, so if you want to publish a paper next year with them you have to at least complete the checklist to make reproducibility easier: http://www.nature.com/nnano/journal/v9/n12/full/nnano.2014.2...

They have also started to reproduce publications of voluntaries, here's a very recent paper detailing their replication efforts: http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjourna...

Article summarizing the paper: http://www.nature.com/news/parasite-test-shows-where-validat...
The EFF has something similar, panopticlick: https://panopticlick.eff.org/
I have found this works often in my day to day life. I will be get struck at one thing and when I about to drop a mail, and I write the detail explanation about the problem, I get the answer.

Nice to know this is called as "Rubber Ducking"
Get the HD 6xx or the HD 800 if you can. I'm not saying the 500 series are not good, but the 600 and the 800 are way up there.
I don't know if the culture at Netflix is to blame but I've been noticing more and more how poorly designed their consumer-facing interfaces were. The UI "feel" on the web site strikes me as aged where there's so much that could be done to make me want spend the extra $15/month to upgrade my membership.
I won't even mention the iPhone/iPad apps that are nothing more than a very weak implementation of an HTML iFrame.
FWIW, Theo did email me a brief note which indicated he had given serious thought to my analysis. He sounded really busy: http://bit.ly/eVNck1

The IV chaining is obviously broken, but it doesn't seem like it would make a make a good backdoor.

RFC 2405 (1998-11) says "The IV MUST be a random value."

RFC 3602 (2003-08) says "The IV MUST be chosen at random, and MUST be unpredictable." So the protocol knew about it at that time.

So it was a learning experience for the protocol developers at that time, not just OpenBSD.

If there is a smoking-gun type backdoor found, I suspect it will have to do with unexpected or out-of-order IP headers or ipcomp.
Perhaps I don't recall my linear algebra well (we called it engine math), but there's a hell of a lot more to it than just passing inputs through a series of operations. Linear algebra is more about the methods used to design very elegant models and transforms and understanding the limits of those models and transforms.
> whats app can quickly scale and become the next Facebook or Google with a few years.

Whatsapp got bought by Facebook, they will definitely not become the next Facebook and I sincerely doubt they'll ever become the next google. Try as I might, living without Google is hard, living without Facebook is stupidly easy.
Considering it's all built on well-known and tested (provided you follow the best practices) cloud services (AWS right?) I often wonder what they do all day. Netflix platform strikes me as something you invest heavily in at day 1 but then only need a boilerplate team of developers to keep it ticking over and responding to user feedback.

They love to bleat on about their Chaos Monkey this and Chaos Monkey that. But come on, they wrote a read-only cloud-hosted and distributed video streaming service that leans on standard cloud services and best practices for 90% of the hard parts. Chaos Monkey just smacks of writing a integration test for a third party component you don't own.

Frankly I wouldn't want a job at Netflix simply because the problem domain is not interesting enough. Read-only highly-resilient distributed systems are not particularly hard to create and test. It's only becomes an interesting problem when you need to do a comparable amount of write-ops at the same time as those read-ops.
If gradient is available then it makes little sense to say you want people to compare that method to GAs. GAs are for black box search.
> I don't see the point of bitcoin or any other virtual currency? To me nothing beats legal tender currencies.

All currencies are "virtual". They all exist because we agree they exist. They're all a consensus reality. Due to the banking system, most USD exists merely because banks claim they exist.

The point of bitcoins is internet cash. They are frequently compared to credit cards because that's what we mostly use right now, but bitcoins behave a lot more like cash. They are mostly anonymous like cash, mostly irreversible like cash, instantaneous like cash. You can't whisk away coins and bills on the internet, you can't use credit cards without identifying yourself completely, you can't use any other currency on the internet without a 3rd party's permission.
"...razing a few cities..."

Actually, the Americans were on the border of _running out of targets_ in WWII Japan because they had already destroyed all the cities.
Damn, I had hope for humanity for a few moments there.
Location: Washington D.C.

Remote: Yes

Willing to relocate: Yes

Technologies:

- Python:
WebApps: Flask
ORMs: SQLAlchemy
Scripting: Subprocess
- Javascript:
DOM: jQuery
Visualization: D3
Experimental: Web Audio API
- StyleSheets:
Less: Bootstrap
Sass: Bourbon/Neat/Bitters
- AudioVideo:
- Live Production
- Streaming
- Metadata Management
- Robotics:
- ROS
- SLAM
- OMPL

Résumé/CV: https://rpy.xyz/about.html

Email: evan.sonderegger@gmail.com
First of all - nobody has been serious about monetizing messaging yet in the US apart from Tango. Kik, Snapchat and FB Messenger have barely started doing anything.

Second of all, I think that there is some kind of hope from Fred Wilson (who is an investor in Kik) that one of the Asian player buys Kik so that he has a big exit there. I doubt he other thoughts than that: WeChat has spent millions of $ trying to get users in the US without much traction to show for it...
Android 5.0.1 seems to have fixed the problem, using factory image will build my own image later to test again
You got off lightly there, the instructor could have made you his assistant and farm out typing up all the course notes. At that speed that shouldn't have taken more than a few minutes of your time ;)
SEEKING WORK: SF Bay Area or Remote,

I’m an IOS developer looking for full or part time work. I can also do some Python scripting.

My App:

http://itunes.apple.com/app/id843971211

Learn Chinese - a travel phrasebook app. I did all the design, UX, and coding myself.
An example is, say you have a counter value. There’s two types of operations users can make - either reset the counter to some value or increment it. The counter was 20 and now it’s 25. Did the user set the counter to 25 or did they increment it 5 times? When there’s only one editor, it doesn’t matter - the result is 25 no matter what. But if two users both edited the value at the same time (the other user changed 20 to 30) now we have two different results based on the users intent. Either the new value be 35 (20+5+10) or we should pick one of the results (25 or 30) and just converge to that new value.

You can’t tell what the users intent was by simply diffing the old and new contents. The right approach is to capture the users intent directly from the software that they use to edit the value, and then preserve that intent through the synchronisation system.

This problem is also easy to reproduce with edits on lists / strings which contain repeated elements.
Sounds like me. Moved to Austria, feel incredibly poor... but still making 1.5x the average local salary in my mid 20s.

Weird experience.
They could, but it's clearly the part which can be replaced by anyone else. Without Pfizer we'd still have BionTech's vaccine, without BionTech we would not.
I believe you express an opinion that is shared by many people who are simply comforted and reassured by the status-quo. Additionally, you work for Google, which has been quite stringent about keeping all work on-site. You'd like to keep your job, so cognitive dissonance induces you to conclude - without much evidence - that this status quo is The Best of All Worlds.

Working full-time from the office is a condition that was created due to certain historical preconditions. In particular, it was a good fit for industrial work, and indeed the modern urban office environment is rooted in the industrial revolution.

It is not at all necessary in our modern world. If you want to live in a big city and commute to a shared workspace every day, you can do so. However, there are so many other options available, and I dare suggest you shouldn't declare them all inferior before trying them.

Overall, onsite office work binds you to exactly one option, remote work allows you a huge freedom of choice - and that is categorically a positive thing.