jkeisling/hacker-news-corpus-2007-2022 huggingface dataset:
> especially with respect to gender-diversity in the Coq community.

Seriously there are some people getting shocked that a foreign word sounds like slang for male genitals in their language?

These people seriously need to grow up and accept that not everything is centered around their world.

"bit" is slang for cock in French, "chat" is slang for vagina, "Nike" means fuck, should we rename these so that it does not shock anyone? Where's the limit?
As a married woman, I’d say leave ASAP.
Your mental health is most important to a fulfilling life.
People marry the wrong person every day. Divorce is the way out of this situation. Judges are more realistic today about women and their plots.
Write down and document everything. Find a couples therapist so you have on record you are trying to make the marriage work for everyone.
The therapy will either make your wife “grow up” and perhaps better your relationship or it will show her inability to deal with reality of marriage as a working relationship.
Don’t be the guy that hates his life. There is the right person for you out there. Take that first step for your own sanity.
Her parents can help her out financially. She knows this too!
You have to in the US. What part of that is so hard to understand? Our public transit is trash, so there's no other option for people who live outside the city and have to go there. If you want to fix something, fix that.
That's a red herring response.
Seems more likely that a massive industry popped up around selling sexy footware (as opposed to say sexy satchels or sexy mittens) because there was a substantial demand for it. Perhaps the success of the industry has reinforced and perpetuated the belief that feet are sexy, but it doesn't make sense that some industrialist woke up one day and said "I'll make an extremely impractical shoe and sell millions by convincing the world it turns people on"
Is there a section where I, as a college student, can just add my statistics?
Well done on coming clean. However this is why the dinosaur pens have such arduous red tape -- to try and catch serious errors before they hit production. A mate of mine works in that world and he regularly stops code going into production that would hose mission-critical government data.

I prefer my agility to remain on the dev-and-test side of the fence.
A browser should let the user control their browsing experience and make it extremely easy to block all manner of user hostile content, starting with trackers.
It's really a matter of strategy. Do you want the protocol/vocabulary to be used everywhere, but in closed-source implementations with a free/libre ecosystem constantly lagging behind? Or do you want something that will be less friendly to governments and multinationals but will be part of a striving lesser/non-profit ecosystem?

XMPP/Matrix went the first way. Matrix ecosystem has one reference client/server with really good features but hardware requirements that place it out of ordinary folks' reach. Similarly, XMPP has some really good apps built on top (eg. Whatsapp) but the free-software clients (not servers) are lagging behind, though catching up quickly in the past years.

ActivityPub ecosystem went the other way with AGPL everywhere (Mastodon/Epicyon/Funkwhale/Peertube/PixelFed/Funkwhale/Mobilizon/WriteFreely/Lemmy/Plume) with the notable of bookwyrm who has the Anticapitalist Software license. As a consequence of the ecosystem tailoring to users/non-profits/cooperatives not corporations/governments, it's blooming into this amazing and friendly ecosystem where everybody contributes and interoperates. Hell, who would have thought three years ago selfhosting federated/p2p livestreaming video would be become so easy as Peertube?

Personally i'm more on Jabber/XMPP's side (i contribute to joinjabber.org project, and use Jabbber/XMPP daily) mostly for technical reasons (AP/matrix haven't yet caught up with XMPP in many regards) but in my view adopting loose licensing is what almost killed the XMPP ecosystem all these years ago when it had the exact same promises as matrix does today: one universal federated protocol to bridge to all others.
Speaking of pornhub...

There used to be a way to see your pornhub search history even if you were always incognito, right on the site. It worked really well but I never figured out how it worked.
Is there anything wrong with that? If people want EVs that's better than people wanting modern gas guzzlers.
The internal components also don't get dusty if it's sucking instead of blowing air through the filter
An hourly rate of $46 for top-notch UI/UX design is a steal imo. What was your experience like working with DesignPickle and ManyPixels?
You understand what maybe means?

BTW you are borderline:

I wrote:

It's the opposite, psychopath are attracted by power.

Your Answer:

>I recognize in myself that power corrupts me. For example, now that I’m rich - I don’t see the poor as being equal to me.

I'm rich others are poor, right out of consent just to tell others your are rich (show your power) but actually not a bad person (manipulate).

then:

>Please keep your diagnosis to yourself - it will benefit you and those who love you.

"Please keep your diagnosis to yourself - it will benefit you and" again a threat or show your power "those who love you" but i am actually not a bad person, that ticktok from threat to manipulation is the exact pattern of a psychopath.

>I have never met anybody else who was wealthy or powerful deny that temptation is there - historic literature is rife with the same sentiment.

No one said anything against that. And again "never met anybody else who was wealthy or powerful deny that temptation is there" i know lots of powerful people. "historic literature is rife with the same sentiment" i am so powerful i should compare myself to historic literature.
Hey All, we made a simple dashboard to track stocks on social media and what people are talking about. Still a lot of development going on, but hope that it might be fun -- would love to have more feedbacks.
>And again (don't use the same application / idea/ company each time)

Is it not a red flag that someone applies consistently applies with a new idea and/or company each time? In my opinion that doesn't really show commitment to something.

Showing improvement in traction over time might be a better way.
Building from source is happening anyway. The browser is pretty much a js logic/html+css view compiler. It just JITs it when the page loads instead of creating a downloadable binary.

With node/io and Go, servers have been build-from-source for a while.

Given the snarly mess of frameworks/tools/languages/abstractions used in web dev, it's not obvious you'd get worse performance or inferior code using JIT LLVM and some newly minted update of Visual Basic or Swift with component/object/view caching.
Based on the timeline I would suppose it is related with the massive financial crisis that Portugal plunged in that time period, culminating in the 2011 bailout.

At least as far as it can be observed from my first hand perspective most homicides in Portugal are passional in nature: mostly conjugal but many derived from disputes between neighbors or rival groups. It is very rare to see drug motivated murders.

One thing that is very clear in these past 10 years in here is that decriminalization allied with social and medical intervention by the government (needle exchange programs, methadone clinics) had two very visible effects in the drug use dynamic in this country, one direct and one indirect.

The direct one was to reduce the risk of death and disease among the drug user population. HIV among this group was reduced in 30% [1] for instance.

The second effect was indirect. The drug of choice and most problematic (considered an epidemics in the end of the 20th century) was heroin. But as the government started to treat people the drug lost its mistic of a rebellious and dangerous pleasure and became a "hobo drug" for a few poor toxicodependents that depend on the government for their next fix. And that change of perception is (IMO) responsible for the rapid decline of heroin use that followed this policy.

All things considered I believe most portuguese see the effects of the decriminalization as a positive thing and, at worst, it had no negative effect in the health of the overall society.

[1] http://www.dn.pt/inicio/portugal/interior.aspx?content_id=43... (in Portuguese)
Uptime guarantees are rarely worth the paper they're printed on. Most will give you some lame credit if they exceed the very generous amount of downtime they allow (e.g. 99% = just under 4 days a year downtime).

The only way to get real uptime is to have dedicated on-site support. Which is to say "someone to yell at" when the system(s) go down. But that type of service is quite expensive indeed (add an extra 0 to what you're currently paying minimum).

For $100 you're going to get shoddy support and some downtime. All you can really do is buy $100 systems with different vendors so that if one vendor is offline you can push the workload to the other two.

But then of course you need to design your infrastructure to move workloads around, and that within itself is a lot of work...
This is one the cases where I wouldn't mind reverting the original title to what OP linked and let readers draw their own conclusions.
Maybe you're not the maker's target demographic. Not being a Mac user, for example.
Yeah, I think everyone wonders that too. I have no idea what Ive's other skills are.

Maybe he is best left as Apple's lead industrial designer, and maybe that's what he loves and wants to do more than anything else.

Or maybe he also has the leadership skills, communication skills, vision, judgement, and business sense to succeed Jobs. I have no idea, and honestly don't ever expect to until years after the succession actually occurs.

I'm not an Apple investor either, so it's all academic to me anyway.
Assuming good indexing with non-enormous tables, he could use subqueries to get the COUNT() data at the same time that he pulls the records themselves. And, as he notes, he could have a count field in MySQL, caching at that level instead of in Redis.
> [...] the architecture of a building is better if it's built by using a CLI interface [...]

Bullshit. The architecture of buildings is refined from models made in clay, drawings made on paper, people walking around the physical site, and annotations to photographs. Eventually, the building is realized with cranes and hammers and two-by-fours and drywall.

There’s potentially one step in there where each part is precisely specified numerically, and you could maybe make that step easier by typing into a CLI. But saying that’s “the interface”, or “a better interface” to the design or construction of the building is an almost impossibly myopic analysis.
My impression is that it goes way far and beyond the scheme standard with all its additional features.
It's using millisecond precision time for the nonce, yes. Nonce collisions in a normal volume chat are unlikely. If you'd like to suggest improved counter code, however, I'm all ears. :)

A corrupted server could alter messages without the key if it had both the plain and encrypted versions of a text. But to get that, the javascript would have to be compromise, and at that point the server might as well just steal the key anyway. This has already been discussed above, and if you're worried about it, the solution is actually pretty trivial. I especially like Whimsy's suggestion of a Grease Monkey script for verification.
I like it better than the older iPhone designs. Then again, don't generally like Apple's product designs.
First off, I want to congratulate you, reg, on coming up with such a fantastic idea. With Joel's post, and the no-job-hoppers-wanted fracas from several weeks ago, this is something that was in the air, and you were able to pick up on that, and put it into words. Even better, you don't appear to be trying to figure it all out on your own in a vacuum.

One approach to getting started would be to provide resume screening services to employers. I'm sure there are a bunch of service businesses like that today, but if you solve the problem like it is an NLP problem rather than an HR problem, that could be a differentiator.

At a large enough enterprise, I'm sure there are people who are applying for a bunch of different positions over an extended period of time, and just being able to solve that problem intelligently for that one enterprise is something that must be useful for some big firm out there. So I don't think you need to have a bunch of employers on the system to get started.

But that doesn't address the real challenge, which seems to be that your service provides clear benefits to the employer, but not for the employee. The employer gets better candidates, more efficiently, and almost every business that's hiring acknowledges that they have trouble finding enough good candidates.

What about the potential employee? Why would they want to participate in this sort of system vs. the status quo? That seems like the challenge to me, more than legal issues, or the employer side of the equation.

There is definitely terrific potential here, exactly because hiring is currently so inefficient: it'll be really interesting see how this idea develops.
The main problem with hiring/resumes isn't just volume. Volume has become a problem with the ease of sending the resume. We removed a barrier(fax, mail, drop off) and naturally the flood started. Businesses compensated by listing arbitrary values for hard skills/experience, which in turn applicants sent resumes to places they were even more unqualified for on paper.

The crux of the problem is that there isn't a way to directly quantify what is absolutely needed for a job position, and in turn, there isn't a way for an applicant to demonstrate they meet those qualifications, short of the person doing the job. The need for human interpretation is too ingrained in the current process, even with the filtering mechanisms in place
People want to be able to silently make screw faces when talking to each other, it's human nature.
I asked two questions that are relevant to me right now: "What salon software should I use for bloombeautylounge.com"

No results

So I tried something more generic:

"What salon software should I use?"

No results :(
Colo can be confusing. There are large companies that have their own data centers (sometimes dozens of data centers) and many small companies that often bundle and re-sell services. I currently use CoreXchange, which is now owned by Zayo. I chose them partly because they are pretty close to me; I'm in Austin, the data center I'm hosted in is in Dallas. They have pretty clear pricing on their website and their connectivity and service is good and fast. But, there are many, many, good providers out there. I would check in your area (assuming you're in an area that has good backbone access; most large cities do), first.

There are cheaper providers and more expensive providers...sometimes, it can be hard to tell whether you get what you pay for, without actually trying it. But, most of the big colo providers have been discussed online at Web Hosting Talk or other places. When getting new service, I usually check WHT first for deals in my local area in a good data centers. Sometimes, for low bandwidth (where low bandwidth may mean something still kinda huge, like several terabytes of transfer per month) a reseller may be the best deal. Sometimes, going straight to the provider is the best choice. I ended up a CoreXchange by way of a deal from ColoUnlimited.

The good thing about going this route is that ongoing costs are somewhat lower, generally speaking, though up front costs are much higher (~$3000 for a server, for example). And, costs can be predicted with high precision. You can simply say, "I want this much bandwidth." and that's what they'll give you and bill you for. You're pretty much just paying for power and bandwidth when you're in a colo; all the other stuff is up to you (hardware upgrades, replacements, etc. either need to be done via shipping gear in and out or by going on-site to make the changes).

The bad thing about going this route is that it's all on you. This isn't "managed" hosting (though they do have staff on-hand, and you can usually pay for "remote hands" to handle system upgrades and such, it tends to be very pricey for anything more than simple reboots). And, scaling is non-trivial. In the bad old days, if you had a site get crazy popular overnight, you had to figure out how to get more servers online on short notice...maybe missing an opportunity to grow and blowing your shot at a good first impression on new users. AWS and other cloud services are much more readily scalable. But, there's no reason you can't build with scaling in mind, and use cloud services for elasticity while using colocated servers for your baseline service. That's how we do for our business stuff. If we suddenly need more servers online, we spin them up via Amazon or Google Compute Engine (the software I work on supports several cloud providers, as well as building cloud infrastructure out of heterogeneous servers, so this is not much different than managing VMs on our own hardware and we can move websites and such back and forth across our own machines and AWS VMs reasonably easily).
Could they think of any more permissions to ask for? I think that's the first time the permissions list has needed me to scroll.
Desert is an ecosystem too, and a fragile one. It can also be destroyed, and would definitely suffer if all that sunlight was "farmed away".
That's GREAT news. Delicious is one of the web apps I can't live without. Hope the new company can update the firefox plugin such that I can upgrade to Firefox 4.
When the info leaked that Yahoo was thinking about dumping Delicious, I wrote a Chrome Webapp that lets one scrape bookmarks from Delicious, corresponding to lists of tags (any bookmark, not just your own).

It's still out there (and still works): https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/nbahmnpelbdcmkpllm...
Wouldn't they catch a bare hand the same way? How does not wearing gloves help?
For some reason, searching the Market from my phone for "google docs" didn't list this app. Found out that their "install" button on the Market website actually works quite well. :)
Pass a bill requiring the budget to be balanced. It's that simple.
>In my experience the best people have been pretty chill, bathe every day, observe general social decorum, and try not to act like jerks. I refer to both PhD and those sans BS

it depends on what you mean by 'the best' - some of the most effective people i know (in terms of 'getting things done' and making money) are somewhat less technically skilled, but have those social skills you are talking about. It really does give them an edge.

Nobody is saying that social skills and technical skills are not better than technical skills alone. However, for people who are technically skilled enough, well, they get a lot of slack when it comes to social skills.

The best technical people I know require some of that slack. social skills, just like technical skills, require effort and practice... nobody has the time to become the best at everything.
Another Yelp data point: the CEO saying that there is a definite correlation between people getting Yelp sales calls and their positive reviews being taken down. But it's for the site's own good. Yep.
Ah my bad for assuming you didn't have one.
Can anyone second this opinion? I've had this book on my list for some time now.

I do have a CS background, but always appreciate deeper insight into things I might have missed.
Try replacing "writer" with "startup founder".
What was described could be the basis of a grudge, or it could be that Red Hat were convinced that the current project would not accept changes Red Hat would benefit by even if it helped many other people. At that point, and at the size of Red Hat and how important this technology is becoming for them, it only makes sense for them to secure some of the technological foundations they rely on. It costs them very little in resources in relation to the business they are basing on that technology.

I don't think it's a stretch to look at the events as described and see them as Red Hat doing what they need to work around someone else's grudge. It could be any number of things, but I don't think the information presented so far lends itself towards Red Hat having a grudge.
Have you had a chance to play with Fancy Zones yet on Windows? (It's in the PowerToys.)

It's not quite as full featured as some of the options on other platforms, but I'm finding it scratches the itch for me a lot more than I expected it would at first glance, especially when you allow it to take over the "Aero Snap" keys (Win+Arrow Key). They've been adding and polishing features at a decent pace, and it's worth checking out (again) if you haven't recently.
My setup is a USB-C hub + switch that toggles my monitor/keyboard/mouse/headphones/webcam between my work (MBP) and personal (homemade frankenstein) machines.

Ubuntu Budgie + https://github.com/rbreaves/kinto makes this a great experience by letting me re-use muscle memory (the key left of space + space => global menu; the furthest-left key + arrows => workspace switching).
The worst part of this overreach is this:

>“federal regulations give U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) authority to operate within 100 miles of any U.S. "external boundary."

... which puts all international airports and their surrounding regions up for grabs.

It's only a matter of time before some judge rules that the US border extends to pre-clearance areas giving the US powers on foreign soil.
It's a very ascetic ukernel, which is a very tiny piece of a horizon derived OS. Like, single digit percentages from a LOC perspective.
The policy file isn't required, by the way. That's just a default implementation. My PDF viewer had a hard-coded policy and didn't use the file.

OK, so in a pure capability language how would you implement this: program A depends on dynamically loaded/installed plugin B written by some third party, that in turn depends on library C. One day library C gets a native implementation of some algorithm to speed it up. To load that native library requires a capability, as native code can break the sandbox. However:

1. You can't change the API of C because plugin B depends on it and would break.

2. You can't pass in a "load native library" capability to plugin B because you don't know in advance that B wants to use C, and if you did, B could just grab the capability before it gets passed to C and abuse it. So you need to pass the capability directly from A to C. But now A has to have a direct dependency on C and initialise it even if it's not otherwise being used by A or B.

Stack walking solves both these problems. You can increase the set of permissions required by library C without changing its callers, and you don't have the problem of needing to short-circuit everything and create a screwed up dependency graph.

With the stack walking/policy based approach I won't know the library needs a new permission until some library call suddenly fails at runtime

You often wouldn't need to. What permissions a module has is dependent on its implementation. It's legitimate for a library to be upgraded such that it needs newer permissions but that fact is encapsulated and abstracted away - just like if it needed a newer Java or a newer transitive dependency.
>Oops, I've accidentally written 'position.absolute' instead of 'neighbour.absolute'!

That's a contrived example though, if I ever saw one.

I don't think that's the kind of issue people commonly have, compared to misuse of shadowed variable further down the scope.

And for your example, a better solution would be for the close to declare what it wants to use from its environment. Python doesn't allow this syntax, but some languages do:

def neighbourhood(position):
return map(
lambda neighbour use (): EDGE if neighbour is None else position.absolute,
position.neighbours
)

Now the compiler can again warn you, since you're only allowed to use neighbour in the lambda.