jkeisling/hacker-news-corpus-2007-2022 huggingface dataset:
Yep, I'm not planning to sell immediately. Just starting to do some research on what would be involved. Honestly I don't know that I'd even sell at all at this point, but it's useful to know one's options. Certainly will continue to pursue further growth!
I disagree with that position, but I concur that the residents of the state could vote to give that power unilaterally to the state [in a way that the federal government could not seize that power from the states, at least in theory if we followed the Constitution].

I think that decisions should be as locally as is feasible, whether that's individual, family, neighborhood, town/city, county, state, or federally only as a last resort.
I’ve only looked at CrunchyData which does seem like more complexity than I want - I was willing to suck it up pay the premium but the monthly OOM crashes have forced my hand - but to where, I don’t know yet
Because if we let people be anonymous, then more people will feel comfortable writing insightful things for us to read. I'd rather have a wider selection of content than know everyone's real name. Knowing who writers are "in real life" is useless and uninteresting most of the time.

In any case, blogging anonymously is certainly technologically possible. And it's neither illegal nor immoral. So I think that makes it a right, no?
Hundreds of PoW altcoins are doomed: https://www.crypto51.app
It's highly unlikely that it's going to do anything to improve vim. It seems this is being done out of necessity, namely google sunsetting Google Code. I could be wrong, but it's unlikely that Bram has had a change of heart regarding encouraging contributions.

NeoVim has my full attention; it's a forward thinking project that is doing everything I hoped Bram would do. With that said, it's going to take years before distros start standardizing on neovim, but it will happen.
The lock down in the first Resident Evil movie seemed quite effective, until the response team reset the security system to get out.
https://www.youtube.com/user/OrderoftheGoodDeath

This is an interesting and entertaining YouTube channel that seeks to address the perceived anxiety and denial of mortality of today's society.
How is private key management a problem when there are so many battle tested hardware wallets used by millions of people?
> Banks are not just managing money. They are distributors of newly minted money via loans. They are not distributors of crypto and the Fed are not involved (or at least necessary) for the creation of new crypto.

So in the brave new post-Fiat world we're thinking of, how does getting a mortgage work, exactly?

The house I'm in was financed by my wife and I purchasing a plot of land, for cash, then offering that land as security to a bank, who then created a loan for a fairly sizable chunk of cash with which we paid a builder to construct the house.

In the all-cryptocurrency world, who creates the crypto in the getting-a-mortgage process?
All new skills are worth learning.
Would you say reddit is also a monopoly, since it's the only supplier of reddit users?
I'm sure it's a conspiracy from Big Climate.
Interesting quote from the article: "He notes, for example, that the H1-B visa program is often described as requiring an unsuccessful search for a skilled American to fill a position before an H1-B visa applicant or holder can be hired, which is not the case. One of the many sources of confusion in this topic is that a permanent resident or 'Green Card' visa does require such a search but the H1-B does not."
> Do you know something that the jurors don't?

This is weird question, because in OJ's case we know a lot of things that the jurors didn't. Part of the critique of the prosecutors in the case was that they decided not to enter a lot of material things into evidence (e.g. the entire Bronco chase).

Also, there are a lot of things that happened since then that the jurors did not know (because they didn't happen yet). He did write a book that was a description of himself committing the murders (but it is "hypothetical").
I'm assuming his accountant told him to make a large investment/purchase for tax reasons, homes are an easy write-off when your wealthy.
You forgot the laugh track indicators.
Do you know how they got to that number of $300 million? Is it just US figures, because the wiki page for 2014 in film shows that the top worldwide grossing film clocked over $1 billion...
I think Okteta has all of the features you mentioned except change highlighting.
Recently read an article about how the Trevor Project (hotline for LGBT+ youth) was starting to implement GPT-2 "patients" in their training routine for volunteers. While they aren't using it in public-facing contexts (yet), it's pretty scary to imagine the implications of depending on this stuff more and more.

https://www.technologyreview.com/2021/02/26/1020010/trevor-p...
I’m an embedded rust developer myself, and have written my own stack with const_generics and am extremely excited to see const generics land in stable.

However (and I’d love your thoughts about this) the one feature I feel has not gotten the love it deserves is DST types and safely creating them. I was writing a zero-alloc no_std h264 and mpegts parser and the hoops I had to jump through to represent extant mpeg structures as valid rust data types was insane and I ran into a lot of edge cases with transmute that made me scratch my head. In the end, I wrote my own macro for creating (in-place new-ing) DST types that transmuted fat pointers (whose representation is not guaranteed but unlikely to change anytime soon) to get things kind of working but the ergonomics and safety were non-existent.

I feel like if rust doesn’t pick up the baton for innovating on DSTs it would be a huge shame since from a security and memory safety perspective they cause the lion’s share of overflow and out of bounds accesses in parsers and other high-risk libraries that silently digest all data thrown their way for media previews, thumbnail generation, etc etc.

What irked me is that a lot of people consider the checkbox for DST support to be ticked when there’s really only the bare minimum for interesting with types containing single DST elements that are already - somehow - created, typically by the standard library itself.

(Again from an embedded perspective: I’m really happy with async/await for embedded development; it really makes reasoning about control flow in an embedded context much more sane!)
> ...look at what you actually use and dive deep

At work we are trying to implement some network security, and I feel lost in the discussion. So perhaps this might be a good starting point?

I have also noticed that I learn best by doing things. For e.g., many many years ago I struggled to understand OAuth protocol, or even load balancing concepts by reading tons and tons of articles on them. A few days later my understanding would vanish into thin air. Then I had to implement this for work -- I struggled but I was not only able to re-learn it, actually put it to use but also retain the theoretical concepts very well.

So I am looking to do something similar. But I don't have the luxury to be hands on at work because the security stuff would be handled by a different team.

That's why I am looking for some tutorials that would guide me but actually make me do something in a sandbox environment.
I'm happy with this. Some extensions are so important they should be integrated into the browsers themselves. NoScript, uBlock Origin, uMatrix and Privacy Badger should just be standard browser features.
I've specifically heard from a deaf person that they much prefer a sign interpreter over captions because the sign interpreter can convey nuance and mood more reliably than captioning.
Maslow's stuff and maybe some CBD. Stress is a killer.
All "customized for you"/"things youll like" algorithms are more about trapping you in a frozen past than expanding your horizons. Everyone together trains the algo what "more of the same looks like" and thats what it regurgitates. Every time I read a marketing copy about AI, that's what I think of first, is that someone literally designed a new mouse trap.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/adamcurtis/entries/78691781-c9b7...

"But taken together the cumulative effect is that of a giant refrigerator that freezes us, and those who govern us, into a state of immobility, perpetually repeating the past and terrified of change and the future."

That article makes the same argument about index funds and hedge funds, the Blackrocks and Vanguards of the world. Minimizing risk means trapping the world in a way that it never has a chance to gamble on changing.

"It has within its memory a vast history of the past 50 years - not just financial - but all kinds of events. What it does is constantly take things that happen in the present day and compares them to events in the past. Out of the millions and millions of correlations - Aladdin then spots possible disasters - possible futures - and moves the investments to avoid that future happening.

I can't over-emphasise how powerful Blackrock's system is in shaping the world - it's more powerful in some respects than traditional politics.

And it raises really important questions. Because its aim is to not change the world - but to keep it stable. Preventing any development thats too risky. And when you are moving $11 trillion around to do that -it is a really important new force."

Personalized tailored experiences prevent the future by making us relive the past.
From the quick glance over the source code, it seems that this implementation has this assumption too. (I may be wrong, though - it is possible I've missed something.)

On the other hand, Redis has "VM" thing, which allows larger-than-memory databases by swapping less frequently used data to disk.
Once you add exceptions, that goes away.

Not really. Exceptions are easy to build on top of continuations, which are already part of R5RS.
old entrepreneurs used to be young entrepreneurs. of course they're better.
Steve spoke with Scott Hanselman recently on his podcast show about Knockout: http://www.hanselminutes.com/default.aspx?showID=262
Google has a cached version:

http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:-cU7R0Q...
When searching my network and being unable to find a match - perhaps could you perhaps do a lookup for the same name on pinboard rather than returning?

example → Unknown, but try example

Other than that, can see this being a handy tool if it gains traction (both the tool and pinboard), thanks.
Is the "Error establishing a database connection" on your site illustrative of their mischief at work?

[I don't comment unless it's a TODO or a DONT EVER... ]
I still don't see how this is 2D or 3D. They are very very strictly related, both visually upon dragging and technically as they simply send back their values (which is exactly 1D of data). Visually/semantically, I'd argue this falls somewhere between 1 and 2 dimensions; they're so tightly bound, they are a single thing, you're just dividing it up. (Visually, a linear relationship is probably better signalled by manipulating a pie chart than a bunch of sliders.)

From a programming standpoint, all these are indistinguishable from numeric fields. If they are related, they belong in a fieldset, and/or probably have a naming scheme implemented in their IDs (slider_a_1, slider_a_2, etc). Screen readers will have to be hinted anyway, probably by a chunk of text before it, ie: for blind users. And there again we fall upon problems with non-linear relationships between the sliders causing trouble if it's all in HTML.

The reason I argue for behavior is because HTML is structure. CSS is its display, and JS is its behavior. That's its purpose; any holdovers (<font>) are just that - holdovers from before a better system-wide structure was enforced. Thus, as this is merely a behavior of a set of sliders, it belongs in the JS layer.

Scrapers are doomed to have trouble with behavior anyway, as HTML has no ability to define that clicking checkbox_1 causes textbox_5 to be prefixed by "squish ". And it shouldn't. That's why we have JS.
Not only that, you get all the games for ALL the platforms. I happen to have both an Ubuntu laptop and another with Windows 7.
When do you plan on using the money?
The answer will be different if you need to spend it in 2 years or if this is saving for your retirement in 30 years.

What is your risk tolerance?

What other sorts of investments do you already have?

If it was me, and it was a long term investment, I'd put it in a S&P 500 Index fund.

https://personal.vanguard.com/us/FundsSnapshot?FundId=0540&#... (this fund has a 0.07% expense ratio)
For those of us not living in the US, or not wanting to stay up late, or even for those that want to work out the best time to go out to look (if it's cold where you are), http://www.stellarium.org/ is a free cross-platform planetarium tool that allows you to simulate the skies from your personal location and gives you loads of info to boot. You can also switch dark skies mode on if you install it on a laptop and take it outside without it destroying your night sight.

If you want to see what a lunar eclipse would look like from the moon's perspective, Celestia (http://www.shatters.net/celestia/) is a free cross-platform solar system simulator where you can go to the moon, set the time accordingly and watch the sun go behind the earth.
Still searching. Sent an email. Thanks
This data is still not accurate, excess deaths is a very lagged dataset. Countries that have been upfront and honest with their numbers have high rates, another such one is Belgium. The difference isn't the government response it's the data.
I can see the problems of the current situation, too. I guess everyone involved does. But what's a viable alternative?

I have seen a few project that were completely build on its own, without dependencies on external libraries. Not only that those projects turn out to be even less modular (because it's not enforced by a package manager / module system), but the chances that code gets unmaintained are also rather high, since developer time is often rare.

An interesting point is releasing the software. No problem with putting it on GitHub, but if projects are commited to official registries like NPM or Bower, the author should really put some commitment into it. Currently it gets ever more complicated to find good quality libraries, becoming a needle in haystack problem. So a "release ethic" wouldn't be too bad.
As a beta user and fellow NEU alumni, this is great! Look forward to see how it progresses from here
There is prior art, the first time I saw vdom was at Clojure Conj 2012, six months before React was publicly released. Project was called "webfui" by Conrad Barski, https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=HeI5-D7SQe8
> Mutually assured destruction

Wouldn't that apply to Google as well?
We're going in circles, so this will be my last comment on the matter. In our experience, over an extended period of time, there was virtually no legitimate use originating from Mailinator users. Maybe it's a fantastic service for others. For us, it was hands down the biggest source of abuse. It would be extremely difficult for anyone to convince me of its legitimacy in the face of the data we saw over a prolonged period.

And it's not even that Mailinator users would sign up, try it for 30 minutes, and then just move on. In that case, I'd just say they weren't qualified, didn't like the service, didn't find the value prop, whatever. But that's not what happened.

I don't really think the "you're going to get screwed, so just learn how to get screwed" attitude is really appropriate. There have been a few armchair theories on how we should have dealt with the issue. Suffice to say, 10 paragraphs of text here aren't going to enumerate everything we tried. And it's not as if we made no product improvements in that period either.

Simply put: if you don't want to use the service, great. If you don't find it valuable, that's fine too. But no one's taking the high road trying to perennially use a service without paying for it, meanwhile calling it a quality issue.

And none of this is abstract. We tried all sorts of technical solutions. People just found another way to abuse. We slapped the credit card gate up and had not a single Mailinator signup for the 2 years after that. It simply solved the problem. Maybe someone will up the ante with fake credit cards . . . for us, we found thousands of Mailinator users weren't willing to take that step.
Would -XX:-UsePerfData also work?

I noticed jankiness in my eclipse and adding that flag seemed to help.
(I'm a previous APNdroid user)

Putting ads in the notification area is remarkably antisocial. This is not what the notification area is for. It's selfish, violates the user's trust, and quite rightly causes the red mist of rage to descend.

It may sound harsh, but your app deserved to be removed for this.
You can't just claim that your rules are the perfectly balanced ones, while the California rules are foolishly wrong and dangerous. Especially given the article we're all commenting on, which shows that even very reasonable bike-friendly rules changes can take decades of effort.

Yes, sharing the road is important. But as somebody who uses multiple modes of transport on the regular, I'm confident in my judgement that the existing standards overly favor cars. If sharing the road is truly what's important, the work ahead of is is much more about improving access for bikes than it is for cars.

Should cyclists in a peloton make it easier for cars to pass? Sometimes! And sometimes they shouldn't, because that would put them more at risk of dying at the hands of some irate dick.. If you can't see that, it's probably because you're not a regular distance cyclist.
Those type of frameworks are great, but they all have performance limitations. The typical solutions are either find a faster framework or write it by hand. If the issue is that it is blocking the event loop rather than the literal performance, then you could spawn a process to do the React work.
Good bet on what happened in 2014!
> I'm not at all sure what the author advocates here would have a big beneficial effect for the economy in general or for workers now working overtime in particular.

The author does a poor job explaining the macro-economic effects. You get a glimpse of the reasoning in the last few lines, where he states that the ratio of corporate profits over GDP doubled, from 6% to 12% of GDP from pre-80s to nowadays.

We[1] have a problem with wealth distribution. I don't draw this problem in terms of fairness, because the concept of fairness is different from an individual to the next. We have a problem of income distribution that goes beyond the notion of fairness, becoming serious enough to be a menace to the stability of capitalism.

A balanced economy has a thriving consumption component, which creates demand, and a thriving investment component, which drives supply. These go hand in hand. If there is too much demand, and investment falters, you get high inflation economies. However, if you get too much investment and demand falters, you suddenly have no investment opportunities and you get a slew of ill effects as capital is trying to find out where it can get returns. The most visible such effect is the appearance of investment bubbles and the crashes when these burst.

People easily recognize the problems of investment-starved economies. The common citizen does not recognize the problems of demand-starved economies, because these are new.

Here, we can witness first hand how young economic science is. Inflationary effects on supply starved economies were the norm in the XX century, so these are very well studied. Demand starved economies? Not so much. The US and the EU are the first ones (possibly, in a slightly different fashion, preceded by Japan).

The causes for this do not lay squarely on politicians. It's easy to take a passionate view and find a target to blame. That is not the case, however.

The current demand starved economy is caused by a big mix of factors. I've never ran the numbers, so take my opinion with a grain of salt: I'd wager the two biggest factors are:

1. Technological evolution, which increases demand while causing a deflation of costs (and consequently, on the circulation speed of money)

2. Globalization. We have moved a great deal of added value to developing countries, namely in the East. If Japan can be used as an example of what to expect, it will take two generations for demand to occur there.

The globalization question is specially problematic. Not because there aren't enough resources for everyone. It is problematic because China is huge. The delay in consumption increase, coupled with huge inertia, can destroy western economies.

The technological question is important, but it has been with us ever since the industrial revolution. We have been able to cope with it, and the same methods should apply.

[1] I'm European. We are, however, in the same boat as North Americans in this problem, with slightly worse politicians. Europe is politically led by Germany. Historically, Germany is prone to fear investment starved economies so they are profoundly erring on identifying the issues and correctly acting).
> debuggable views

One thing I've found while doing Android dev is that views should exist as an immutable collection of state (POJO in Java), and there should be some mechanism to inflate a view from that state. I'm not sure how Angular or Backbone deal with this, but that switch simplified the logic a great deal and made testing straightforward.
> For many websites, no ads = no revenue = no content/service.

Honestly? In my long time of adblock-free browsing I've noticed an interesting correlation - the more ads there are on a page and the crappier they get, the less trustworthy and useful the site itself is. Moreover, heavily advertised products tend to be crap designed to extract money from you by luring you into a suboptimal choice. Ads are a good proxy for both crappiness of the product and of the site that shows them. From what I see, if AdBlock kills anything, it kills sites that have no business being on the Internet in the first place, because they waste people's time.
The HPKP tracking problem is described in section 5

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-websec-key-pinni...

which also includes another description of this HSTS problem.
If you're so curious, I suggest you do what I did and read more of their public statements and writings to satisfy your curiosity.
Sure, but that's my point, I don't think the economic incentives for proof of storage are any better.
Are their glassdoor salaries accurate? 58000 kr/mo for senior developers? You could find similar jobs in Warsaw with half the cost of living.
Plus, the actual driving model is a black box, so there's really not a lot here that's any more reassuring than any other black box lane-keep-assist system on the market, and there's been an active resistance to apply any form of rigor to the system or produce any actual test data from the Comma company for many years (with the argument being that the system is simply an augmented lane keeping system and is just a supplement to the driver etc. etc. and thus does not need to be held to any sort of standard of safety or compliance - where have we heard that one before?)
Interesting, that IS slightly better than I expected, at least for Ethereum. So if we treat each block being found as a lottery "ticket" and that solo miner with a 5700xt on average can expect to mine a block ("win the lottery") once every 43 months....

For Ethereum:

1 block every 15 seconds

5760 blocks in a day

172800 in a month (30day avg)

7430400 blocks in a 43 month period.

So about 1 in 7 430 400 odds when solo mining. Pool highly recommended specially because Ethereum is moving away from the current system of mining long before 43 months from now!