> Great anecdote. Brian is a great guy though.

That was my concern. Brian (didn't here back, but everything got taken care of) seems like a great guy. I was raising the concern that; and this is rather unfortunate, he is atypical.

If I am simply in it for the money/selling favors. Well then the business ends up being a consultancy. The other end, would be the example above. However, the ratio of really successful and thoughtful people willing to read unsolicited email and provide feedback likely isn't very large.

The gap between the people at the bottom - their perceived value, is much lower than the people at the top.

Your model works really well for the middle third of the social network. People in the middle may or may not be willing to help ostensibly equal people do something (advice, get a deal done, talk politics, etc.)

The problem I found was the people in the bottom (me in this example) and Brian[1]. But not actually Brian, but a character representing how the media portray Travis Kalanick.

Travis has a lot of money, success, insight and power. He has a super small amount of time. I on the other hand have more time now as my recent contract negotiations didn't go super well.

The problem, we found doing the model is what the people at the bottom could provide of value to a guy like travis that would be equal in value to his perception of time.

So I like the model, there has to be something interesting to bridge the gap though, a twist that would tie it together. I don't love just limiting people to castes or something, or only letting high value or mid-value people on.

My buddies Idea was basically a reverse syndicate. Actually turned out to be interesting, but I don't thin workable, where I (a person at the bottom) am an entrepreneur.

1. Entrepreneur [me]

2. You [you]. You and I know each other, and you know Brian. I am raising a seed round and I want Brian to fund me, but I don't know him at all. Well, you know me so we are a degree of separation.

3. However, that isn't really enough for you to leverage your friendship with him for an acquaintance. His idea was something like:

I would give you micro equity to introduce me if you got a deal done. maybe some bips if you can get him my deck, and the guy get's me to invest

4. So I am bridging the gap with a maven in the middle. However, it get's crazy as some people are social connectors and some aren't and then you just end up trying to remap society into a sql/graph database, or distributed ledger if your trendy.

I really like both the ideas (yours and his), but really cracking that code is the win, and while I trivialized it above, it is both high value and a super hard problem which is not solved at all. Especially, if I need to/want to connect with some subset of the billions of people like me, but who don't speak my language.

The idea is pretty decent. Execution is hard as it always is of course, but really connecting the dots here on ux and psych will be interesting to tackle.

Jeez. I realized I have been invoking this guys name a ton, and I don't know him at all. I mean, I assume he is a great guy based on the fact that I was able to email him, and you said he was a cool guy, so I am making him out to be a social network hero, but this is an example. Brian, if you read this, hit me back man, I could use some more DO credit.