jkeisling/hacker-news-corpus-2007-2022 huggingface dataset:
Aaron Patzer was a single founder at Mint.com and there are many more examples.
They don't detail the number of trades nor do they account for commissions or slippage.
The Fed does not create money. Banks create (expand) money by lending. The fed has purchased corporate bonds and swapped them for more liquid securities (treasury securities/M1). The Fed wants you to think there is inflation, so you get scared and "lock in" your pricing on homes/cars/etc. This activity stimulates the economy.
Frankly, those images are rather damning. The devices and the interface are too similar for Apple to just let this slide. If anything I would say Apple has to do this to avoid setting a very dangerous precedent.
What dialects would have the most difficulty? Is it the 'L', or the 'BR'?

Would LibOffice be better or about the same?

How about LibaOffice or LireOffice? (I know both 'li' and 'ba' or 're' are chinese syllables that can be written in pinyin.)

Even if they can't change, maybe there could be an official alt-name for native Asian-language speakers.
> can't Heroku/GitHub/37 signals or someone sponsor a week of dev time to automate a system

Heroku does sponsor Matz, Nobu, and Koichi. We hired them and give them a full time salary to work on Ruby.We don't tell them what to work on (i.e. we don't dictate what features or projects get shipped in what versions) it's more like corporate sponsorship. GitHub hired tmm1. Beyond that CRuby has a host of other non-sponsored contributors that contribute code and doc patches as well as set up tooling. You don't need corporate sponsorship for that, you need a passion and some time. You, in fact, could be the very person that sets up this automated system.

I find the attitude of '<company x> should sponsor <thing y>' a bit misguided. While I agree that companies who profit from a OSS should give forwards to OSS, individual contributors are ultimately they only way progress gets made. If you or someone reading this works for a company making money off of Ruby do that thing! Tell your boss you can't deploy on friday afternoon and have to fix a bug in the Ruby codebase. Ship the project on company time, and then boom...your company just sponsored that thing. It's like magic!

Anywhoo, yes finding out what things are blocking the MRI team from adopting a tool/technology and working around them can be extremely valuable. For example Matz has agreed to move the codebase development to github. This would make contributions a bit easier, however there is a blocker. There are a ton of SVN bots and tooling written around the current workflow. Right now the Ruby core team wants to spend time focusing on pumping out C code to fix bugs, improve performance, and progress the language forwards. They don't want to go off into the woods on tooling. These types of projects could be hugely impactful to the team and don't require C knowledge so most Ruby devs may be able to help. I encourage you and others to reach out to the core team to ask them what tooling projects they need and how we can help them. Understanding why someone isn't using a tool/technology is a really good start.

tldr; Good idea, let's talk to the core team about ways to help with tooling.
I cannot speak to this study in particular, but it is worth noting that a recent meta-study found that the science supporting meditation isn't as strong as people tend to believe: http://www.tricycle.com/blog/meditation-nation

Meditation has been touted as a cure for practically everything, a reputation it cannot possibly live up to. This reputation is already creating a back lash -- this article is one example: http://www.salon.com/2014/12/06/mindfulness_truthiness_probl...

I think meditation has something genuine to offer, but it's going to take some time before there are enough quality scientific studies for a true picture about meditation to arise. And before that happens, I wouldn't be surprised if the pendulum of public opinion swung over to the other side.

For example, vulnerable individuals with a history of trauma may approach meditation thinking it will cure all their problems and then be surprised by intense memories of their trauma resurfacing, preventing them from going about their day-to-day life. Such people rightly feel that meditation has been incorrectly advertised.
Why is it unreasonable to expect the RubySpec dev to do additional work, but reasonable to expect additional work from the MRI devs to comply with RubySpec?

I get that "the implementation is the standard" is frustrating for people who want to make an alternate implementation, but why should that obligate the original developers to accept some third party's definition of what their project should be?
This has created the only-in-L.A. phenomenon of commuter gangs: guys who drive a long way to be with their homies at the corner where the gang began. (In the 204th Street neighborhood in the Harbor Gateway, I met gang members who drove in from Carson, the San Gabriel Valley, and even Palm Springs.)

The joys of living in California. I wonder if this will happen in East Palo Alto too.
Make it funny:

http://learnyouahaskell.com/

http://learnyousomeerlang.com/

http://learnyouanagda.liamoc.net/

http://landoflisp.com/

http://realmofracket.com/about.html

don't skimp on the cool simulation stuff!
agentzh's work is amazing. Real definition of a 10x or 100x developer.
The "next generation" started and went out of business in 1997. There were a whole host of sites that uses this exact model in the late 90s. All of them failed. I'm guessing it's because the traffic the advertisers get doesn't convert to very many sales.
Your project doesn't market itself, but remember, many folks writing open source really don't care if anyone else uses it or not.

The statement, "But if you believe your project has value — which you probably do, since you spent time on it — you should try to get it in the hands of as many people as possible," is not really true. There are times it makes sense to market it widely, such as: 1) you are a consultant and want to use it for marketing yourself, or to get gigs based on it, 2) the project complements your product so driving wider adoption of it has positive implications for your main focus; 3) you are attempting to establish a name for yourself via open source, and being an author of a widely used library is a Good Thing. There are others, but those are three common ones.

There is a VERY large class of open source where this just doesn't matter though -- things which you write for yourself to use, which solve your problem, and which there is no overhead to open sourcing, so you do it altruistically. Frequently, in this case, adding lots of user support, community building, marketing effort, etc will in fact add enough overhead that the project becomes a net negative in relation to your goals.
A case of cryptomnesia perhaps? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cryptomnesia
Did you see the pics at the bottom? I thought I was looking at an iPhone photo until I looked a bit closer.
That's a matter of opinion. I always do this. Now there is no question what each conditional is intended to do. So if I make a mistake, you can clearly see from the conditional comment what I meant to do.
Hopefully it acts like miracle gro
where are you based? do you have a co-founder? email me: citizenkeys at gmail dot com
Cache size is (fortunately) limited, and I wouldn't want a webapp to be able to store 100+MB of data in local storage without explicitely asking for my consent beforehand.
Comment scores help me get to the best points (even if they are in disagreement) without spending a lot of time reading the whole page.

I'm reading a lot let now because there are no scores; I just skim the top and then move on.

Comment scoring allows the community to reveal quality.
That sound like it worsens the signal/noise ratio. If a comment is definitive (and ratified by up votes) then there would be fewer comments reiterating the point.

Are we going for more informative or more participatory?
<poking_fun>Facebook is ruining a generation. I am 25 and by middle school every girl and boy was on AIM and had awesome and deep quotes in their profile info. We all also had fantastic buddy icons and used unique smiley faces.

Now on Facebook, all I see are post like "If I get X people to join this group, I will do Y and Z." What happened to those creative icons? Where are the lyrics from Nirvana? Isn't that what the internet should be about?</poking_fun>

My real point is that (IMHO) for every person who has something original to say and it's worth listening to, there is between 100 and 10,000 people who only are willing to repeat something someone else said. Being original is hard work carries risk. The Internet just gave a voice to all the people who are not willing to be original. Maybe the OP went to a particularly special middle school where the concentration of the former type was way higher than usual.
The return one gets is a function of elapsed time since bitcoin started with every newcomer getting ever-diminishing returns even if they expend the (Moore's law inflation adjusted) same amount of work. With pyramid schemes, the wealth of those who got in early is entirely supported by those who came in under them at a later date. It's not entirely analogous as later bitcoin adopters aren't kicking back value to the early adopters, but there are similarities in the end result: someone new to bitcoin in the year 2029 has no chance of catching up with those who were new in 2009 due to the fact that the total number of bitcoins has been mathematically limited to 21,000,000: http://www.bitcoin.org/faq#How_are_new_Bitcoins_created
Lack of push notifications natively is the primary reason why I haven't purchased tweetbot.

Isn't there some middleware they could use to solve this problem intelligently (like urban airship)?
Not if there's only one unofficial entry in this field. "The" entails that the following noun phrase uniquely identifies something, not that it's been endorsed by some entity.
Buuuuut, is that really a valid use case? how many people do actually want to remotely print from another network to a printer, beside print shops without dedicated WiFi networks? How many people do actually want to use it as some sort of fax-machine replacement?
Any reason a regular count() wouldn't work?

SELECT a.id, count() FROM ...
The former. Think of it as 3FA. Something you know, something you have, and multiple people who need to grant access to that thing you have.
While Cloud Print may be an exception, a problem seems to be that Google has perverse incentives.

Creating new products is probably over incentivized, while the boring work of operating and maintaining existing useful products is under incentivized.
Why doesn't Google just charge for this?
This is the only thing that makes printing off of an Android phone even ok. I have a Pixel and for the life of me I cannot print easily from it, and I have tried multiple different printer manufacturers.
My guess is these things are generally unprofitable because their internal costs are so used to operating as a near monopoly they simply can’t do anything on the cheap. Which ends up killing off seemingly viable products.

It’s much like how bell labs invented so much great technology, but could never make the transition to new producers themselves.
Thank f--- for that. The era of "Winprinters" and manufacturers trying to differentiate on (awful) software can't end soon enough. Apple had the right idea at the dawn of the LaserWriter back in 1985.
The application of the bumper sticker is the vandalism, just like graffiti.
Uh... Did someone in the article seriously ask for Uber/Lyft to artificially limit the number of cars on the road? Isn't that one of the problems with traditional taxis? They never learn. Meet the new boss, same as the old boss.

I'm glad to be living in a city with a functional public transit system (NYC) so I no longer have to be forced to be robbed by Uber (SF).
It really isn't neutral. It's massively left-wing which, while relating to most of HN's demographic, isn't really useful in this case due to the constant anti-India/Hindu bias on HN.
I actually prefer the aesthetic of Chrome, but the functionality of Firefilox is better overall.

And Firefox UI is going through a redesign (Proton).

https://winaero.com/enable-the-new-proton-design-in-firefox/
Desperate times call for desperate measures. Most of that growing group of people see their lives getting materially worse over time. It makes sense that they’d be desperate and incurious enough to hitch their wagon to a strongman figure who says the things they desperately want to hear. The governments of the western world have done a pretty bad job on the whole with making the lives of the people better. Reversing that trend would do a lot to help solve the problem (few people want to overthrow governments when they are safe and content).
Sounds like the open command is similar to xdg-open.
One benefit of function based defer is that you can use anonymous functions to create hacky block-based defers.

If the language only has block based defers then that's it. You have that and only that.

What if I create a resource in an if block and want to defer closing it when the function ends?
Yes, and the user community and PMs on the gov't side are terrible at defining requirements. Even moreso as the number of stakeholders increases.
Thanks for weighing in - I stand corrected.
Very nice concept, but I guess that if you try to create an exchange or accept payments with that: governments, tax offices and FATF institutions will come after you.

TLDR with my understanding of the concept:

At the opposite of crypto, the concept is that anyone can create an "exchange" acting as a bank, and all transactions are public in an encrypted form.

So you can check the transactions if you know the key of your transaction. But it is not crypto in the sense that you have to trust one authority (the exchange) as a bank. It is the one that will hold user credits in the end.

The very fun thing is to create a "bank" like that for you and your friends. It is like an IOU bank.
nit: knit
As I recall, Apple's fan would quite unapologetically acknowledge that Apple ran on fear of abuse by Jobs [1]. The story was that Jobs was a unique genius capable of running things that way and deserving to run things that way. The magical results were worth it. Just being near the "reality distortion field" was its own reward [2].

Regardless of how the rest of us might judge all this, Apple now has something of a problem. Decompressing from a previous abusive situation involves certain stages of recovery [3]. Even if, regardless of if, one began with the view that this was "abuse for the best all possible purposes" or how much one identified with the success of one's abuser [4]. In similar fashion to the problems faced by the liberalizing Stalinist regimes, Tim Cook may find that his liberalizing "tweaks" open flood gates that he will have trouble controlling [5].

[1] http://gawker.com/5847344/what-everyone-is-too-polite-to-say...
[2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reality_distortion_field
[3] https://1in6.org/men/get-information/online-readings/recover...
[4] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stockholm_syndrome
[5] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Berlin_Wall
"Sad that we still don't have any kind of common libraries or whatever"

We do have those. In this case the common library is called "libc." In this case (and in a few others) the Go team decided to intentionally avoid providing an interface to this function.

The good news is it would take just a few minutes to add support for go to call strftime directly from libc.
I interned for IBM twice: once in '95 (Boca) and once in '00 (Hawthorne as a research intern). The second was by far much better (working with all those great researchers), but there is just something about working for IBM that is a bit depressing...it really is Big Corp.

My current employer (Microsoft) has a reputation...but the reality is no where near what I felt when I was at IBM.
Here, directly below the actual listing of the constants: http://golang.org/pkg/time/#pkg-constants

But I would also observe I missed this documentation myself a couple of times, and I think it probably should have gone on the package documentation, so while I'm linking you to this, I'm not necessarily disagreeing that it's misplaced a bit.
Are you talking about the Windows 95/98 49 day time rollover bug? That didn't affect NT either.
The problem is that people who think they have the technical ability to do it right is astronomically higher than reality, not because people overestimate themselves, but because they underestimate the difficulty of "rolling your own bitcoin storage." I mean, you can make these arguments, but the history proves that so far centralized storage has been safer than self storage, on average.

Further, Coinbase does give users access to their private keys with the multisig vault, so one of your two criteria has already been met.
Yet, that wish what the mainstream operating systems effectively deliver, at least whenever you use them for real work.
> Even if you held, as long as you don't realize your losses you will be right back to pre crash levels in 2-3 years, just like in 2008 or any other recession.

Japan still hasn't recovered from the 80s. At some point the economy is going to stop growing. A lot of growth is driven by debt which needs to be repaid. A lot of growth is driven by an increasing population which will eventually plateau, and what's worse you have to support those people (healthcare, education, housing) if you don't want them to cost even more money.

At some point the economy isn't going to just keep growing. I have no idea when that will be, but the market doesn't just go up over time as if it's some law of nature.

https://tradingeconomics.com/japan/stock-market
Observation in the course of forum use. Similar to unwritten social convention or rules.
The president really shouldn’t write this stuff in his twitter though:

https://www.scmp.com/news/world/africa/article/3076240/coron...

Coronavirus: Nigeria reports chloroquine poisonings after Donald Trump touts antimalarial drug as treatment
I bought an old trench coat from a thrift store and outfitted it with 350 programmable LEDs , an Arduino to control them, and a 24 AA battery bank for a music festival last year, it was a hit. I'm currently working on adding another 150 LEDs, fixing the power system (I burnt out the Arduino after a couple hours), and looking into adding a microphone and learning some sound programming to make the suit change colours to the beat for this year. I always wanted a living technicoloured dreamcoat.
Basically, anything written in Elixir Phoenix, or erlang, so: Discord, Pagerduty, Bet365, the entire NHS. If you're a startup, in SF, there's a good chance your payments goes through Brex. You might be using Slab for your documentation, you might use Boston's MBTA, etc. Probably a not-insignificant chunk of what you do as a startup at some level depends on a framework that uses linkedlists. Do you use RabbitMQ or Riak? Linked lists are the primary list datatype for that system.
This has been a personal fear, the death toll is significant, however being in a younger demographic I am more readily concerned (personally, not trying to be callous) with permanent disability. After seeing what SARS left people with I had a new appreciation for the other side of "recovered". It seems too early to tell long term effects, hopefully everything is temporary.
why can’t she be a physicist or an engineer? Is the implication that no one will hire her? If so, could you substantiate? It seems hard to believe.
It is very different than sagemaker SDK - BentoML is a flexible and all-in-one solution for model serving. You package the model once and can easily test it, do batch/offline serving and online API serving. And even if you just package your model with BentoML and deploy it to Sagemaker, you get a 10-20x performance improvement out-of-the-box comparing to doing it with the sagemaker sdk.
The last part looks a little scary: "If we flood the market with dollars faster than China can buy them relative to its own currency, this strategy will fail, and eventually China will be forced to liquidate its dollar reserves. This will have the effect of driving the price of the Yuan up, and the Dollar further down."

The problem I see with this is that when the U.S. pumps more money into circulation by buying up U.S. treasury bonds, etc., it further devalues the dollar. The Chinese (and Russia, India, etc.) know this well, and are perfectly happy with this. They'll continue to watch us devalue the dollar. Later, if we try to pull anything, they'll use the money they've amassed to buy up an overwhelming military force. But obviously, they'd rather own us than fight us. Not that they are set on world domination, but when the idiot on the block keeps lowering the cost of his mansion, and you'd like to have that mansion, you'd be stupid not to let him lower the cost until you can buy it for 20% off (or more).
I recently converted the Python port to use lxml instead of BeautifulSoup.

If you need speed (BeautifulSoup is slow), and not portability (lxml won't work on google app engine), check out http://blog.interstellr.com/readability-in-python-using-lxml
I find that it's broken down a lot by education / social class. The white-collar workers are more likely to use Google than the bulk of the population, which certainly uses Baidu by default. That said, when Google pulled out, a lot of my Chinese friends also switched to Baidu.

It's totally understandable why: Google China sucks. It's slow and plagued by connection resets and random outages.

Also, it's painful to use as an English speaker. The default locale keeps switching back to Chinese, regardless of whether I'm logged in or not. Google refuses to remember that I want English search results. It really sucks to Google for "Java API" and to have the first search page full of Chinese forum pages where the only English is "Java API" and Oracle's official API docs maybe on page 2. Using a VPN is too slow to merit use instead of Bing. So I've given up, I now Bing all day.

Regarding the reason: Google didn't lose because it's a foreign company, it lost because it refused to understand the market. KFC, GE, Apple, and tons of other American companies clean up in China. Google lost because it wouldn't play ball.
I get it: The Beatles are huge, and Apple's had a colorful relationship with them. But why does that make tomorrow unforgettable?

"While the move to digital does not quite rival the band’s first trip across the Atlantic to appear on “The Ed Sullivan Show” in 1964, it is an acknowledgment that online purchases dominate the music industry’s sales strategy."

I didn't realize that the online purchasing model was something that still needed acknowledgement, and I definitely don't see how one artist's addition to the iTunes catalogue (even if that artist is The Beatles) is such an acknowledgement.
Well it is one thing to recognize it, but another to be able to comfortably read it.
You can't make a scalable layout with tables.

You can't easily change complex table-based layouts, because you get lost in the td-s and tr-s.

You can make forms even easier with some clever CSS.
Yeah, quitting your job is a poorly planned out idea, but it does sound like freelancer is your best bet. It gives you the ability to work on different problem sets, as well as upward mobility without having to leave development behind. Many will suggest architect, but in my opinion if you love the code you will not like drawing boxes all day. most of the people that I know that ascended to architect, did not like the position. The recommendation to start consulting on the side is probably the best option. Growing a consultancy while having a steady source of income is a lot easier than trial by fire of popping right into it.
I see, thanks for the explanation! As written in the other response, hopefully we'll see an EFI upgrade fixing it soon.