'Chameleonism for me isn't something chosen, I guess that's the difference. The way it sounds in the original post is that he is appeasing people. To me it just happens. I can honestly say that 75% of...|||Well, yes, to be quite honest. I have noticed it in most Ni dominant males that I have metx97almost all of them in fact. I don't walk around putting off vibes of superiority, and I wouldn't admit to it...|||Those are the most stereotypical INFJ majors imaginable, what are you talking about? Sure, history itself isn't conducive to Ni users, as we don't like gathering massive amounts of information unless...|||You know what? I think you're right. I've never really looked at Gandhi, to be honest; I just assumed he was the quintessential INFJ because of public opinion. John Lennon is another INTJ that always...|||Yeah, XNFJs are more renowned for political acumen than XNTJs are. Think about Martin Luther King, Malcom X, Hitler, Gandhi, Ayatollah Khomeini, Osama Bin Laden, etc. Whether they worked for good or...|||Content, personality, and face are all very INFJ looking. Just watched a piece of an interview on him: I would bet big money he's an INFJ.|||There is an abstraction of the object. Are you watching the same video as me? He is extrapolating abstractions from many aspects of life and using the scarf to express them. That's Ne. An Se user...|||All functions are subconscious. Everyone's first extroverted function is mostly instinctual, as far as I can tell. Even the logical types have a subconscious disposition towards logic. It was...|||Let me elucidate and say that Ni users don't create, period. Ne users create. Ni users have a revelation about what is happening. Think about Isaac Newton's (INTJ) laws of physics. He didn't create...|||No introverted function is engaged with the external world. Ni is concerned with searching for patterns in the user's external input.    From Carl Jung's Psychological Types:  Whereas, the...|||I meant more in the intrapersonal sense. What Fi users call deep is a framework of how they view themselves in relation to the world. We don't view ourselves in relation to the world. We don't need...|||MBTI and Jung have the same exact definitions. The only thing MBTI did was add the three functions subservient to the first. Jung just classified people by their dominant function. This means that...|||They aren't, though. Every function they have is different. Fi, Te vs Fe, Ti leads to the biggest division between the two.  Dante Scioli    It's definitely Fi, Ne. We have no Fi or Ne. I think...|||I'm not looking for a war. I've already got into enough of those in the past couple days.   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bMvG2mQMZZw  Click around randomly and watch a few seconds. Everything...|||I agree he uses more Fe than your usual ISTP, but I still can't see Ni dominant for him. I wonder how much his culture had an effect on his philosophy. I still don't get an XNFJ vibe off of him. ...|||He is definitely not using Fe in that picture. He still looks like a stereotypical INFJ, though. You can tell he isn't an INTJ.|||ISTP. Most of his philosophy wasn't that intense, to be honest. He wasn't living in an Fe world, either. He was an Se user, I'm 99% sure.|||HIM. Inside his profile. Open it up. The dude with the phone.|||What was the pragmatic reason for banning homosexuality, anyhow? What was the reason in the past? Is being repulsed at homosexuality innate or learned?    You said it, but all the Fi users here...|||Tell me the truth, do you see it or not? I see it. The more you put next to each other, the more you see it. The only problem is I'm running out of eminent INFJs. All INFJs:  447554  447562 ...|||Mel Gibson, INFJ breakdown:   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mAysB3qvm9A  0:22-0:28. Look at how comes up to her: fast aggressive movement. Highly indicative of Se. Look at his face, too. He...|||I've read Jung and some of Schopenhauer. I think Jung is a little subjective at times, same as Freud. I love to hear XNTP theories, but I wish they would have elucidated better. Schopenhauer sees the...|||https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2bBk2gd1Kfk  Look at the section from 2:50-2:53. Look at his mannerisms. He is giving you the Te nod.  3:10-3:30. You don't think those are Te mannerisms? Really?...|||All ESFPs. Try to put any of them in the XNFJ or XSTP category. They shouldn't fit if you are seeing what I'm seeing.  447474  447482  447490  447498|||I seriously doubt an ISTJ would even think about the subconscious very much, let alone make an entire theory on it. Seriously, celbritytypes.com is the most misleading thing in the world.   ...|||Quit looking at celebritytypes.com. they have Robert E. Lee as an ISFJ. Their judgment is beyond pathetic. He is such a blatant Te user that it makes me cry a little inside when I see something like...|||No they don't. Put Day Lewis into the XNTJ lineup: he fits great. Put Mystery into the XSFP lineup: he also fits great.  Seriously, does Day Lewis really look like an Fe user to you? I'm not trying...|||That's not true. They do communicate something. You can tell a lot about a dog's temperament by the way he looks, same with humans. Why would you think how you are on the inside wouldn't have any...|||Juxtapose XSFJ with XNTP. They are very similar. (Sorry for no women. I couldn't think of any off the top of my head.)  447202  INTP  447210  INTP|||447138  ISFJ (High emotional intelligence. Not an XNFJ.)  447146  ISFJ. (Note the eyes. Very common look for Si women.)  447170|||447090  ISFP  447098  ISFP  447106|||447050  INTJ (High intelligence.)  447058  INTJ  447066|||447010  ISTJ  447018  ISTJ (Not an INTJ. Quit buying into the evil overlord meme.)  447026|||XSTP users. Contrast this with XNFJs. We all have the same functions and have obvious similarities.  446946  ISTP  446954  ISTP (Very high intelligence. Don't conflate him with an N because...|||You are an ENFP. Look at your face in that picture. You are exuding a strong Te look, like you want to be seen as an INTJ. You don't even realize that because your understanding of the theory is so...|||446762  INFP  446770  INFP  446778|||I'm not going to do any feature breakdown this time. It's become relatively apparent that I'm no XSFJ. Pay attention to the faces. They are different. If you can't tell they are, you have low...|||I'm not trying to be mean, but it's more about knowing people than knowing the theory. I could teach any emotionally intelligent XXFJ the theory and have them type people, I do believe. I don't think...|||Ha-ha, you a funny guy. You have no clue what you are talking about. I'm arguing with a toddler.|||It doesn't and I never said it did. It is a superficial grouping soley for the purpose of ease of use. People are emotionally intelligent. People would be this with or without a theory. The theory is...|||She is an INFP, and a stereotypical one at thatx97Tolkien, too. Yes, I can tell people that. You feel insulted for me imposing, and I feel equally insulted by you debasing the theory. She is an INFP...|||Summary: I have never looked into the theoretical framework of this theory. I assume it doesn't work. Cognitive functions are the theory, comrade. The letters mean nothing. You are ignorant and a...|||I do look at people and understand them in one glance. All XNFJs do. You don't know what you are talking about. Look how XNTJs process Te information: quick and efficiently. The ONLY difference...|||Ha-ha, watch some Seinfeld, kid. You wouldn't last one day in our world. Don't you know those rumors that tarnished your reputation back in high school? Those were XXFJs behind that. They are smarter...|||It isn't something I just learned on the internet. I have always understood people. All the theory did was give me a theoretical framework to place them into. I understand the theory perfectly fine....|||There is a prominent look for each extraverted function. You thinking there isn't doesn't make it any less so. You have to understand that the theory only places you within a 1/16 accuracy. There are...|||I agree that physiognomy is more an ISFJ proclivity. They are the ones who are more cognizant of facial features, expressions, and body language. We take it in subconsciously, meaning we can't...|||She's an ESFP. That is Se dominance. You have your Fi and Fe mixed up.    Don't feel like typing him, but those are Te movements, 100%. He says long dialogues without breaking eye contact and...|||Mystery is an ESFP, sorry. I didn't really watch much of the video. Those are Se mannerisms; he is much too confrontational to be an Ne dominant. His face does make a V.  445794  445802  I...|||That is an Fe, Se smile. XSTPs and XNFJs are the only ones who make that. You are right that an ESFJ won't smile that way, as they have no Se. As for Jung (INTP), it doesn't matter what he thinks. He...'