'Note: Remarried biological parents count as having been through a divorce.|||You've stated that both are ''interconnected and lead to the same path'' and have ''negligible differences'', if that's what you're referring to.  I've already answered that point.  They have...|||You've stated that my point is true in theory, but in practice it gets ''muddier''.  What are you concretely referring to, when you're referring to ''it gets muddier'', and how does it invalidate...|||What are you implying?|||I'm highlighting the nuance between White Supremacy and White Nationalism; they are not equivalent, and the latter does not entail the former. These two concepts envelop two different political...|||I'm claiming that there are no inherent racial hierarchies required for White Nationalism.  [Race] Nationalism does not require one to see [race] as being superior, equal, or inferior to any other...|||Something being considered a threat does not entail that it is considered inferior.  By the logic you've presented, considering it good would imply considering it superior, and considering...|||Possible motives can be self-preservation, historical inheritance/ownership, identitarian sovereignty and functionality (ex: social cohesion), with different combinations, none which entail...|||The definition does not correspond to White Nationalism, as White Nationalism does not require the existence of a racial hierarchy, and it does not require the dominance over other races.  For...|||The term supremacy seems to have been reduced to the idea of appropriation, ownership, or accessibility, specifically through the premise that others cannot reach such a status (thus arguing from...|||I assume you're referring to the land on which it was founded, not the country itself.  The country itself can be seen as a heritage from the European settlers/founders, to be inherited by their...|||Here's two hypothetical arguments combined,  I want the United States to remain ethnically homogeneous, based on the ethnicity of its founders, because it's a historical relic that was meant to be...|||Supremacy can be reasoned through expansion (therefore relocation or genocide of other populations within foreign land), or local domination over foreign individuals.  Someone who wishes to...|||White Supremacy is not part of White Nationalism.   Nazism is in contradiction with what is now known as White Supremacy; I assume you're drawing the parallel with the idea of expansion.  White...|||White Nationalism is distinct from White Supremacy.  Richard Spencer also explicitly denied being the latter, and made the distinction.  What makes you think that he's the latter?|||When you state that we see the world; what is the world, if not an objective external entity, independent of one's perception?  What is it that we're interacting with, in order for us to...|||It may not be practically quantifiable, although, it is estimated, yes. The analogy presented, and the explanation presented, demonstrate the process.   My point did not include justifying an act....|||There are good and bad people, although, it is not an inherit trait.  For instance,  I assume we both agree that taste is subjective.  Yet, despite being no inherently tasty and non-tasty...|||Affirmative Action is an example of accepted and encouraged discrimination (racism and sexism).  If a criminal is put into prison, it is also accepted and encouraged discrimination.|||I recall you've stated that you never wanted to engage with me again.  Thus, are you willing to argue the coherency of  certain points presented in the video you've posted?|||Thus, you did not find any errors in the reasoning of the points being presented?|||Do you agree with all the points the video makes?  Assuming that you've watched it, did you see any fallacies being committed?|||What made you think that people were arguing people's existence?  Would you claim that those who state that races do not exist are arguing everyone's existence?|||I'm not stating that races cannot mix, nor was I referring to ''racial cultural differences''.  There seemed to be confusion on what constituted ''fundamental'' (as I was asked to explain), and...|||It is biological, it is not a difference in culture, for instance.  A fundamental difference between males and females, for instance, would be skeletal structure, genitalia, chromosomes, hormonal...|||You seem to be equating superficial to culture, or something of the sort.  What is biological, is fundamental.  Skin pigmentation is a fundamental difference, skeletal structure is a...|||I fail to see how one implies the other, not to mention that superficial is rather ambiguous in that context.  Could you elaborate?    I've given the example with the ice cream (illustrating...|||I disagree with the idea.  For instance, Obama would be considered a Negroid, by that standard, although, he is not a Negroid, as he's significantly mixed.    I'm assuming you're inferring...|||Do you perceive your statements as being self-refuting?  You speak of interracial marriage and mixed-race, yet you state that this somehow does not imply that the offspring is no longer...|||Genocide requires intent; I assume you meant 'white' individuals race-mixing (self-refuting statement) does not produce non-white individuals.  1/3 white is not white.  In the same way the...|||I think that it generally derives from empathy (arguably 'superficial'), as well as social profiteering.  Vague statements that encompass both;  My friend is [race], and I do not wish for my...|||I marked what I was referring to, in bold.   Presuming you were condemning supporting others running over people with differing views, unless it is acceptable for one but not the other.|||That seems to be ironic, given previous statements.|||It can be argued that individual actions influence the collective, and as such, managing the collective would imply according importance to individuals' actions, and therefore guide them.|||From my understanding, that is no longer related to the concept of reality that I/you were initially referring to.   It seems to have shifted into some figurative meaning of real, which does...|||How do you, or would you, perceive atheists who frequent churches?  Intentions can vary from being part of and involved with the community, to enjoying the mass (vocals/reciting/etc.), to being...|||I'm uncertain of what your point is.  Are you stating that reality and/or existence are subjective, and/or are you stating that this ranking derives from a comparison between two subjective...|||I did not state that what is imaginary is not real.  Ideals exist and morality exists.  Although, you've brought up two points which I disagree with;  1) Imagining something does not imply that...|||Morality is also an imaginary ideal.  For instance, by thinking that everyone is equal, you're also submitting to an imaginary ideal.  I fail to see what is the relevance of stating that...|||I do not consider it to be as significant as you seem to be, although, I do consider it to be a factor or a description of a broader phenomenon that resulted from other factors, indeed.|||Why did you choose to post this topic in the Critical Thinking & Philosophy forum section?|||Radical views (does not entail terrorism) and the Christian Middle-East are two topics to consider.   The fear of Islam does not necessarily stem from terrorism/extremism.|||Unless I'm misunderstanding, that is what I've stated, or at least, it does not contradict your claim.    Statistical data is simply a representation of a state or phenomenon, based on a...|||You've reiterated that point, and I've told you it was irrelevant to the point.  I quote my reply,    You're clinging to the condition I've presented at the end (to a defined extent, as it...|||What if he does believe that certain teachings of Islam are evil?  Whether you agree with him or not, is not relevant to the point.|||If that was supposedly your point, why did you contest/disagree with the explanation I've given?  I still think we're in a misunderstanding.  Would you still repeat the point below? If so, then...|||The evil was referring to a tenet considered to be evil.   I'm not making any claims regarding what is/isn't evil; I've used the terms on the basis of using it from the perspective of one who...|||Versions of Islam are attempts at interpreting Islam, and are thus claims about the teachings of Islam.  Now, the point is that those who are considered non-evil-Muslims possess different...|||You seem to have misinterpreted my post, as I did not state that not following a certain doctrine would disaffiliate them with whatever religion is involved.  I will quote the context of the reply...|||Although that was not my claim, I will respond to a specific point.  If one claims to abide by a specific doctrine, and that doctrine is not followed, he is inevitably doing one (or multiple) of...'