Integrating technology and Ayurveda: An experience of dilemmas in a postgraduate research scholar leading to pioneering research

Sir/Madam, In my nine years as an Ayurveda student, I once thought that combining Ayurveda with other systems of medicine diminish its authenticity. I strongly argued that Charaka's authoritative verse, "Yadihastitadanyatra"[1] was proof that integration was unnecessary. "Ekam shastramadhiyano" of Sushruta[2] did not mean studying modern science but other Ayurveda Samhitas and Veda-puranas. Over a period, such a thought process evolved, and out of the cocoon emerged the realization that integration is possible without wearing down the spirit of Ayurveda. The editorial article "Technology in Clinical Practice of Ayurveda (High-Tech Ayurveda): Need of the Hour"[3] was crucial in emphasizing the benefits of integration and validating the new terms of beliefs that I had settled into. Some of these inputs might answer similar doubts among fellow students who are conflicted about accepting integration. FINDING SOLUTIONS My interest was first sparked by Sushruta's technique of "incorporating unique features of nature into science." Numerous Yantras that mimic the beaks and mouths of vivid birds and animals[4] meant that observations from nature could be integrated into Ayurveda. Since concrete developments have occluded human exposure to natural creations, technological developments observed today can be cautiously integrated to benefit the patient. Besides, it did not require Sushruta to become a blacksmith but rather to assimilate proficiency from that stream. Ultimately, it was not possible to draw boundaries and confine Ayurveda. Any authoritative knowledge (~Veda) that was beneficial to the patient and lifesaving (~Ayushaha) could be considered Ayurveda. SUBSTANTIAL INSIGHTS FROM THE EDITORIAL ARTICLE Technology was said to overcome human errors, which might serve as the basis for developing medical devices in Ayurveda. It highlighted the epistemological (~Darshana) principle. The main reason why modern science continues to flourish is that it is founded on direct perceptions (~Pratyaksha), whereas certain Ayurvedic physicians, like myself, could be wary of new technology. It makes sense for Ayurveda-Vaidyas to embrace verified knowledge from other streams as Ayurveda accepts both Pratyaksha and Aptopadesha (~Expert knowledge). DNA barcoding, as mentioned, can resolve uncertainty among controversial drugs. Plant tissue culture can help preserve endangered species. Chromatography, genome sequencing, and phytochemical analysis could vindicate Ayurveda from being considered an outdated superstitious placebo medicine, find reasons for the adverse effects of medicines, and backlash against Ayurveda.[5] In conclusive understanding, it was realized that if technology remained unexplored due to a lack of ambiguity, the potential of both technology and medicine could remain obscured. INNOVATIVE RESEARCH After realizing the importance of integration, it led me to design and develop an instrument for the Sthanikabasti (Kati basti) Panchakarma procedure that could automatically regulate the temperature of the oil to avoid repeated manual replacement. The device was linked to a smartphone application to facilitate operations through the smartphone and maintenance of records. It could be affordable for patients with chronic low back pain and used at home after proper training. Thus, overcoming the prejudiced perception of protecting Ayurveda from technological inclusion resulted in carrying out pioneering research on operating Panchakarma devices through smartphones. Financial support and sponsorship Nil. Conflicts of interest There are no conflicts of interest.

Topic: Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies
Subfield: Complementary and alternative medicine
Field: Medicine
Domain: Health Sciences