MP14-12 SPONTANEOUS PASSAGE RATE OF URETERAL STONES AND PREDICTIVE FACTORS AFTER PRE-STENTING

Field: Medicine (Health Sciences)

You have accessJournal of UrologyCME1 May 2022MP14-12 SPONTANEOUS PASSAGE RATE OF URETERAL STONES AND PREDICTIVE FACTORS AFTER PRE-STENTING Yasmin Trachsel, Beat Förster, Hubert John, and Christoph Schregel Yasmin TrachselYasmin Trachsel More articles by this author , Beat FörsterBeat Förster More articles by this author , Hubert JohnHubert John More articles by this author , and Christoph SchregelChristoph Schregel More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000002543.12AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Patients presenting with ureteral stones often require an ureteral stent as temporary solution due to infections, pain management or preparation before ureteroscopy. Stones can pass spontaneously along an ureteral stent but the currently available data is limited. As knowledge on passage of ureteral stones is essential for subsequent choice of diagnostic and therapeutic interventions, we aimed to assess the frequency and identify predictive factors of stone passage with indwelling ureteral stent. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all patients treated with ureteral stenting for ureterolithiasis diagnosed by CT scan from January 2015 to August 2020. Subsequent preoperative CT or results of ureteroscopy were analyzed to ascertain passage. We defined the stone size by three-dimensional maximum diameter measurement in CT imaging. Local ethics board approved the study. The primary endpoint was the spontaneous passage rate. We used multivariate logistic regression analysis to identify predictive factors. RESULTS: Overall, we included 401 patients who received stenting for ureteral stones. Median follow-up time between the interventions was 26 days (IQR 22-31). The allover passage rate was 23.7% (n=95) with a median stone diameter of 4.7mm (IQR 3.3-5.6mm). The rate for passage in a stone with maximum diameter of 0-2.9mm, 3-4.9mm, 5-6.9mm, 7-8.9mm and > 9mm was 75%, 37.1%, 19.1%, 10.3%, 8.2% respectively (Tabl. 1). Location (OR 1.63, CI 1.31-2.06, p<0.001), maximum stone diameter (OR 1.31, CI 1.11-1.55, p=0.002), stone volume (OR 1.01, CI 1.00-1.02, p=0.008) and stone density (OR 1.002, CI 1.001-1.003, p<0.001) were independent predictors for passage. The passage rate of stones in the distal, medial and proximal ureter were 70.8%, 12.5% and 16.7% respectively. Medical expulsion therapy with Tamsulosin, use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory or antibiotic drugs and size of ureteral stent showed no impact on the rate of passage. CONCLUSIONS: We found that almost half of the stones below 5mm in maximum diameter came out along the indwelling ureteral stent (42.6%), which is a higher rate than previously described. Our data allows evidence based patient information and facilitates further treatment decisions. Repeated imaging before definitive operative treatment should be considered in selected patients for further treatment decision and to diminish unnecessary surgeries. Source of Funding:- © 2022 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 207Issue Supplement 5May 2022Page: e236 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2022 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Yasmin Trachsel More articles by this author Beat Förster More articles by this author Hubert John More articles by this author Christoph Schregel More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF DownloadLoading ...