Warranted Christian belief Is There A Question Kant The Problem Kant Two Worlds or One Arguments or Reasons Kaufman and Hick Kaufman The Real Referent and the Available Referent The Function of Religious Language Hick The Real Coherent Religiously Relevant Is There Such a Thing What is the Question Justification and the Classical Picture John Locke Living by Reason Revelation Classical Evidentialism Deontologism and Foundationalism Classical Foundationalism Classical Deontologism Back to the Present Problems with the Classical Picture Self Referential Problems Most of Our Beliefs Unjustified Christian Belief Justified Analogical Variations Variations on Classical Foundationalism Variations on the Deontology Is This the de Jure Question Rationality Some Assorted Versions of Rationality Aristotelian Rationality Rationality as Proper Function The Deliverances of Reason Means End Rationality Alstonian Practical Rationality The Initial Question Doxastic Practices Epistemic Circularity The Argument for Practical Rationality Practical Rationality Initially Characterized The Original Position The Wide Original Position A Narrow Original Position Warrant and the Freud and Marx Complaint The FandM Complaint Freud Marx Others How Shall We Understand the FandM Complaint Warrant: The Sober Truth The FandM Complaint Again Warranted Christian Belief Warranted Belief in God Describes the notion of warrant as that which distinguishes knowledge from true belief. This volume examines warrants role in theistic belief tackling the questions of whether it is rational reasonable justifiable and warranted to accept Christian belief and whether there is something epistemically unacceptable in doing so