Draft: draft-ietf-tls-iana-registry-updates

Commentary: This change aligns the DE text and adds more info about what the DE does and does n't do . It also capitalizes " Recommended " so that it 's more clear that we 're referring to the column . PTAL 
 LGTM , thanks for unifying the DE language .
Experts are to verify that there is in fact a publicly available
specification.  An Internet Draft that is posted and never
published or a specification in another standards body, industry
consortium, university site, etc. suffices.
The role of the designature expert is described in [this-RFC].
The designated expert RFC8126 ensures that the specification is
publicly available.  An Internet Draft that is posted and never
published or a standard in another standards body, industry
consortium, university site, etc. suffices.  The expert may
provide more in depth reviews, but their approval should not be
taken as an endorsement of the extension.
The role of the designature expert is described in [this-RFC].
The designated expert RFC8126 ensures that the specification is
publicly available.  An Internet Draft that is posted and never
published or a standard in another standards body, industry
consortium, university site, etc. suffices.  The expert may
provide more in depth reviews, but their approval should not be
taken as an endorsement of the cipher suite.
The role of the designature expert is described in [this-RFC].
The designated expert RFC8126 ensures that the specification is
publicly available.  An Internet Draft that is posted and never
published or a standard in another standards body, industry
consortium, university site, etc. suffices.  The expert may
provide more in depth reviews, but their approval should not be
taken as an endorsement of the supported group.
The role of the designature expert is described in [this-RFC].
The designated expert RFC8126 ensures that the specification is
publicly available.  An Internet Draft that is posted and never
published or a standard in another standards body, industry
consortium, university site, etc. suffices.  The expert may
provide more in depth reviews, but their approval should not be
taken as an endorsement of the identifier.
The designated expert RFC8126 ensures that the specification is
publicly available.  An Internet Draft that is posted and never
published or a standard in another standards body, industry
consortium, university site, etc. suffices.  The expert also
verifies that the label is a string consisting of printable ASCII
characters beginning with "EXPORTER".  IANA MUST also verify that
one label is not a prefix of any other label.  For example, labels
"key" or "master secretary" are forbidden.
The role of the designature expert is described in [this-RFC].
The designated expert RFC8126 ensures that the specification is
publicly available.  An Internet Draft that is posted and never
published or a standard in another standards body, industry
consortium, university site, etc. suffices.  The expert may
provide more in depth reviews, but their approval should not be
taken as an endorsement of the exporter.  The expert also verifies
that the label is a string consisting of printable ASCII
characters beginning with "EXPORTER".  IANA MUST also verify that
one label is not a prefix of any other label.  For example, labels
"key" or "master secretary" are forbidden.
The role of the designature expert is described in [this-RFC].
The designated expert RFC8126 ensures that the specification is
publicly available.  An Internet Draft that is posted and never
published or a standard in another standards body, industry
consortium, university site, etc. suffices.  The expert may
provide more in depth reviews, but their approval should not be
taken as an endorsement of the certificate type.
The designated expert RFC8126 only ensures that the specification is
publicly available.  An Internet Draft that is posted and never
published or a standard in another standards body, industry
consortium, university site, etc. suffices.