Draft: draft-ietf-sacm-requirements

Commentary: Change the location of DM-006 to OPS and make some new text for it . 
 Do you have any text to suggest ? 
 Sorry . I see has text . 
 I like the change but my only suggestion is to capitalize " Consumer " and " Provider " to make it clearer that these are the SACM components . 
 Version  I am not sure what this statement is actually trying to say . I first read it as referring to a Data Origin source , but then realized that this could refer to a provider in the architecture sense . This should probably be clarified . 
 Hi  , The intent is to have the endpoint acting an instance of a SACM Provider 's identity be specified . Would the following be more clear ( as a replacement to the 1st sentence ): The data model MUST include the ability to provide the identity of the SACM Provider . Thanks ,  
 That does not seem to say the same thing as the current sentence . I think what you want to say is closer to : The interfaces and actions in the data model MUST include the ability to identify data published by a specific provider . I used published because I do n't know if there is a better SACM verb . What I mean by it is " data collected , processed or assessed " . That is data that originated with that provider as oppose to data which it received from elsewhere and relayed on . 
 Hi  , I think it is the distinction is that when the data is provided , in that encapsulation there must be a means to specify the provider of that is what I was striving for ..... I interpret the " identify data published by a specific provider " as potentially being a separate interface as well ? 
 Getting back into the flow of things again . This seems to me to be better stated as an operation requirement than as a data model requirement . The query would say - only get the data from provider X. However it is not clear that I would model this as part of the data when I am doing processing on it . I would not necessary expect to keep this as part of my internal data structures . Data source is already provided as DM-0012 so that would not need to be duplicated here . I would suggest      : Request operations MUST include the ability to restrict the data to be provided by a specific provider or a provider with specific characteristics . Response operations MUST include the ability to identify the provider that supplied the response . For example , a SACM consumer should be able to request that all of the data come from a specific provider by identity ( e.g.   ) or from a provider that is in a specific location ( e.g. in the Boston office ) . 
 Hi  , I have the suggested text now in the merged branch and will fold it into rev -12
Provider Identification: The interfaces and actions in the data
model MUST include the ability to identify data from a specific
provider.  For example, a SACM consumer should be able to request
all data to come from a specific provider (e.g.  Provider A) as
there can be a larger set of providers.
Provider Restriction: Request operations MUST include the ability
to restrict the data to be provided by a specific provider or a
provider with specific characteristics.  Response operations MUST
include the ability to identify the provider that supplied the
response.  For example, a SACM Consumer should be able to request
that all of the data come from a specific provider by identity
(e.g.  Provider A) or from a Provider that is in a specific
location (e.g. in the Boston office).