jiebi/ids-paragraph-commentary-corpus huggingface dataset:
Draft: draft-ietf-rats-uccs

Commentary: ( As per    message of November 8 , 2022 ) 
 Claim Key as specified in RFC8392 are currently called lables in the CDDL in the Appendix . " Claim Key " by itself is only used in the definition of UCCS and never again . Should we decide on a consistent use of Claim Key or highlight that is a synonym to label before the CDDL in appendix ?
Paragraph (version A):
Another use case is that of a sub-Attester that has no signing keys
(for example, to keep the implementation complexity to a minimum) and
has a secure channel, such as a local IPC, to interact with a lead
Attester (see Composite Device, I-D.ietf-rats-architecture).  The
sub-Attester produces a UCCS with the required set of claims and
sends the UCCS through the secure channel to the lead Attester.  The
lead Attester then computes a cryptographic hash of the UCCS and
protects that hash using its signing key for Evidence, for example,
using a Detached EAT Bundle (I-D.ietf-rats-eat).
Paragraph (version B):
Another use case is that of a sub-Attester that has no signing keys
(for example, to keep the implementation complexity to a minimum) and
has a secure channel, such as a local IPC, to interact with a lead
Attester (see Composite Device, I-D.ietf-rats-architecture).  The
sub-Attester produces a UCCS with the required CWT Claims Set and
sends the UCCS through the secure channel to the lead Attester.  The
lead Attester then computes a cryptographic hash of the UCCS and
protects that hash using its signing key for Evidence, for example,
using a Detached EAT Bundle (I-D.ietf-rats-eat).
Draft: draft-ietf-rats-uccs

Commentary: Signed - off - by :   
 due to my suggestions , I approve
Paragraph (version B):
This section discusses use cases for UCCS in the context of RATS.
Paragraph (version B):
Another use case is that of a sub-Attester that has no signing keys
(for example, to keep the implementation complexity to a minimum) and
has a secure channel, such as a local IPC, to interact with a lead
Attester (see Composite Device, I-D.ietf-rats-architecture).  The
sub-Attester produces a UCCS with the required set of claims and
sends the UCCS through the secure channel to the lead Attester.  The
lead Attester then computes a cryptographic hash of the UCCS and
protects that hash using its signing key for Evidence, for example,
using a Detached EAT Bundle (I-D.ietf-rats-eat).