Original text:
expected values, or to apply complex analysis of other information contained in the Attestation Result. <del> Thus, Attestation Results often need to include detailed information about the Attester, for use by Relying Parties, much like physical passports and drivers licenses include personal information such as name and date of birth.  Unlike Evidence, which is often very device- and vendor-specific, Attestation Results can be vendor-neutral, if the Verifier has a way to generate vendor-agnostic information based on the appraisal of vendor-specific information in Evidence.  This allows a Relying Party's appraisal policy to be simpler, potentially based on standard ways of expressing the information, while still allowing interoperability with heterogeneous devices. </del>  Finally, whereas Evidence is signed by the device (or indirectly by a manufacturer, if Endorsements are used), Attestation Results are

Reviewer comments:
maybe unclear if this was what was intended
massaged the change a bit to retain the previous statement better
` I'm not convinced this analogy is helpful. Yes, it conveys the need for detailed information but it also immediately suggests Attestation Results might include PII or privacy sensitive identifiers.
I agree that the analogy to physical passports is misleading. The paragraph tries to justify AR as being detailed and privacy sensitive then in the next paragraph tries to describe them as not needing to be too specific; "Unlike Evidence, which is often very device- and vendor-specific, Attestation Results can be vendor-neutral, if the Verifier has a way to generate vendor-agnostic information based on the appraisal of vendor-specific information in Evidence." It is sufficient to say that both Evidence and Attestation Results can contain privacy sensitive content. The Attester may rely on the Verifier to obfuscate privacy sensitive Claims that were shared as part of Evidence.
It should be clear that appraising Evidence involves various procedures that are part of the appraisal and that these can be quite resource intensive (like creating a passport), in contrast to Attestation Results that are intended to be easily digestible and universal understood (like using a passport)!
add, "URL contain privacy sensitive information as discussed in section {Privacy}"

Revised text:
expected values, or to apply complex analysis of other information contained in the Attestation Result.  <ins> Thus, Attestation Results can contain detailed information about an Attester, which can include privacy sensitive information as discussed in section privacy-considerations.  Unlike Evidence, which is often very device- and vendor-specific, Attestation Results can be vendor-neutral, if the Verifier has a way to generate vendor-agnostic information based on the appraisal of vendor-specific information in Evidence.  This allows a Relying Party's appraisal policy to be simpler, potentially based on standard ways of expressing the information, while still allowing interoperability with heterogeneous devices. </ins> Finally, whereas Evidence is signed by the device (or indirectly by a manufacturer, if Endorsements are used), Attestation Results are