Original text:
value includes the content type and padding added in TLS 1.3 (that is, the complete length of TLSInnerPlaintext).  Padding added as part of encryption, such as that added by a block cipher, is not included <del> in this count. </del>  An endpoint that supports all record sizes can include any limit up to the protocol-defined limit for maximum record size.  For TLS 1.3 MUST NOT send records larger than the protocol-defined limit, unless explicitly allowed by a future TLS version or extension. <del> The size limit expressed in the "record_size_limit" extension doesn't account for expansion due to compression or record protection.  It is expected that a constrained device will disable compression and know - and account for - the maximum expansion possible due to record protection based on the cipher suites it offers or selects.  Note that up to 256 octets of padding and padding length can be added to block ciphers. </del> The record size limit only applies to records sent toward the endpoint that advertises the limit.  An endpoint MAY send records that are larger than the limit it advertises as its own limit. In TLS 1.3, the server sends the "record_size_limit" extension in the EncryptedExtensions message.  5. The "record_size_limit" extension replaces the "max_fragment_length"

Reviewer comments:
The idea of this change is to try to constrain how much padding a sender can add. This is done by calculating the size of a record with maximum plaintext and minimum padding. No other record can exceed this size, though smaller packets can pad to reach this size. I was going to include a formula, then realized that the simple answer is best: pad to the record size limit, then pad to get to a multiple of the block size as normal. Most implementations will be OK because they don't bother with the first step.

Revised text:
value includes the content type and padding added in TLS 1.3 (that is, the complete length of TLSInnerPlaintext).  Padding added as part of encryption, such as that added by a block cipher, is not included  <ins> in this count (see expansion). </ins> An endpoint that supports all record sizes can include any limit up to the protocol-defined limit for maximum record size.  For TLS 1.3 MUST NOT send records larger than the protocol-defined limit, unless explicitly allowed by a future TLS version or extension.  The record size limit only applies to records sent toward the endpoint that advertises the limit.  An endpoint MAY send records that are larger than the limit it advertises as its own limit. In TLS 1.3, the server sends the "record_size_limit" extension in the EncryptedExtensions message. <ins> 4.1. The size limit expressed in the "record_size_limit" extension doesn't account for expansion due to compression or record protection.  It is expected that a constrained device will disable compression to avoid unpredictable increases in record size.  Stream ciphers and existing AEAD ciphers don't permit variable amounts of expansion, but block ciphers do permit variable expansion. In TLS 1.2, block ciphers allow between 1 and 256 octets of padding. When a limit lower than the protocol-defined limit is advertised, a second limit applies to the length of records that use block ciphers. An endpoint MUST NOT add padding to records that would cause the protected record to exceed the size of a protected record that contains the maximum amount of plaintext and the minimum permitted amount of padding. For example, TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA has 16 octet blocks and a 20 octet MAC.  Given a record size limit of 256, a record of that length would require a minimum of 11 octets of padding (for RFC5246 where the MAC is covered by encryption); or 15 octets if the "encrypt_then_mac" extension RFC7366 is negotiated.  With this limit, a record with 250 octets of plaintext could be padded to the same length by including at most 17 octets of padding; or 21 octets with "encrypt_then_mac". An implementation that always adds the minimum amount of padding will always comply with this requirement. </ins> 5. The "record_size_limit" extension replaces the "max_fragment_length"