Code change:
Missing important step new people SSH into the node
/language en
Hi could you please explain the issue in detail. /triage needs-information
Page mentioned in the issue (based on the title): /language en
/retitle Users not instructed to SSH into the node before executing commands in "Upgrading Linux nodes" page
/sig cluster-lifecycle
I'm not sure this is valid, though there isn't much detail to the issue to explain what the concern is. The commands on that page need to be run on the node being upgraded, but I think how the administrator connects to that node is out of scope. It may be SSH, it may be by accessing the cloud providers console. It may be by rolling up a crash cart and plugging in a monitor and keyboard. That all depends on the individuals environment.
/remove-triage needs-information
/remove-kind support /priority awaiting-more-evidence /kind feature /sig cluster-lifecycle
Those labels are not set on the issue: <detailsIn response to : /remove-kind support /priority awaiting-more-evidence /kind feature /sig cluster-lifecycle Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available . If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the repository. </details
My opinion: if you (the reader) don't know how to get a shell on a node, it may not be a good idea to try upgrading it. Best learn the basics first.
We could list “shell access to the node“ as a prerequisite. I don't think we can or should assume SSH; I'm barely happy that we assume superuser access comes via .
for new contributors. page to update: change: to: make sure you add in the PR description. /help /triage accepted
This request has been marked as needing help from a contributor. Please ensure that the issue body includes answers to the following questions: Why are we solving this issue? To address this issue, are there any code changes? If there are code changes, what needs to be done in the code and what places can the assignee treat as reference points? Does this issue have zero to low barrier of entry? How can the assignee reach out to you for help? For more details on the requirements of such an issue, please see and ensure that they are met. If this request no longer meets these requirements, the label can be removed by commenting with the command. <detailsIn response to : for new contributors. You need to have a Kubernetes cluster, and the kubectl command-line tool must be configured to communicate with your cluster You need to have a Kubernetes cluster, shell access to all its nodes, and the kubectl command-line tool must be configured to communicate with your cluster /triage accepted Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available . If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the repository. </details
/kind feature /remove-priority awaiting-more-evidence
/priority backlog
This one looks like a candidate for a "good first issue" label. I think that the page should also have the shell access note, regardless of the method used (ssh, rdp, etc).
I don't think this is a good first issue. A good first issue would have a description that helped totally new contributors find out how to help, and the description for this issue at the time of writing is:
/assign
Got it. Going through the details, I see another problem here. The pre-req of having shell access to the nodes seems mostly relevant (a corner case) for the node upgrade task, for other cluster maintenance tasks, API access to node management seems enough. The problem is that the , and many other pages use the same prerequisites document (). So, adding the "get shell access to the nodes" phrase will alter all these documents where this step is not needed. I think that, for this particular task, we should not use the include prerequisite doc and rewrite the paragraph locally on the pages, as a compromise between convenience and accuracy. What do you think?
That'll work fine.
Given the need to modify two documents and the potential for content drift across releases, etc, I decided to add a new prereqs include file with the modified paragraph instead of rewriting the whole prerequisites section on both documents. Let me know what you think. Thanks

Related discussion:
text: ## {{% heading "prerequisites" %}} <del> {{< include "task-tutorial-prereqs.md" >}} {{< version-check >}} </del> <ins> {{< include "task-tutorial-prereqs-node-upgrade.md" >}} {{< version-check >}} </ins> * Familiarize yourself with [the process for upgrading the rest of your kubeadm cluster](/docs/tasks/administer-cluster/kubeadm/kubeadm-upgrade). You will want to upgrade the control plane nodes before upgrading your Windows nodes.