jiebi/CodeConvo huggingface dataset:
Code change:
This is a Feature Request <!-- Please only use this template for submitting feature/enhancement requests --<!-- See for guidance on writing an actionable issue description. --What would you like to be <!-- Describe as precisely as possible how this feature/enhancement should work from the user perspective. What should be changed, etc. --Translate into Japanese Why is this needed Comments <!-- Any additional related comments that might help. Drawings/mockups would be extremely helpful (if required). --/language ja /assign
This issue is currently awaiting triage. SIG Docs takes a lead on issue triage for this website, but any Kubernetes member can accept issues by applying the label. The label can be by org members by writing in a comment. <detailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available . If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the repository. </details

Related discussion:
text: <ins> --- title: ファイナライザー id: finalizer date: 2021-07-07 full_link: /ja/docs/concepts/overview/working-with-objects/finalizers/ short_description: > 削除対象としてマークされたオブジェクトを完全に削除する前に、特定の条件が満たされるまでKubernetesを待機させるための名前空間付きのキーです。 aka: tags: - fundamental - operation --- ファイナライザーは、削除対象としてマークされたリソースを完全に削除する前に、特定の条件が満たされるまでKubernetesを待機させるための名前空間付きのキーです。 ファイナライザーは、削除されたオブジェクトが所有していたリソースをクリーンアップするように{{<glossary_tooltip text="コントローラー" term_id="controller">}}に警告します。 <!--more--> Kubernetesにファイナライザーが指定されたオブジェクトを削除するように指示すると、Kubernetes APIはそのオブジェクトに`.metadata.deletionTimestamp`を追加し削除対象としてマークして、ステータスコード`202`(HTTP "Accepted")を返します。 コントロールプレーンやその他のコンポーネントがファイナライザーによって定義されたアクションを実行している間、対象のオブジェクトは終了中の状態のまま残っています。 それらのアクションが完了したら、そのコントローラーは関係しているファイナライザーを対象のオブジェクトから削除します。 `metadata.finalizers`フィールドが空になったら、Kubernetesは削除が完了したと判断しオブジェクトを削除します。 ファイナライザーはリソースの{{<glossary_tooltip text="ガベージコレクション" term_id="garbage-collection">}}を管理するために使うことができます。 例えば、コントローラーが対象のリソースを削除する前に関連するリソースやインフラをクリーンアップするためにファイナライザーを定義することができます。 </ins>
Code change:
reference:
/assign
/assign
hello, can you please leave this this will be my first contributions towards open source. hope you don't mind.
Sure
/unassign
/triage accepted
/kind documentation

Related discussion:
text: ## Start a Kubelet process configured via the config file {{< note >}} <del> If you use kubeadm to initialize your cluster, use the kubelet-config while creating your cluster with `kubeadmin init`. </del> <ins> If you use kubeadm to initialize your cluster, use the kubelet-config while creating your cluster with `kubeadm init`. </ins> See [configuring kubelet using kubeadm](/docs/setup/production-environment/tools/kubeadm/kubelet-integration/) for details. {{< /note >}}
Code change:
This is a Bug Report <!-- Thanks for filing an issue! Before submitting, please fill in the following information. --<!-- See for guidance on writing an actionable issue description. --<!--Required Information--Problem: The image files in need to be converted to an SVG. Currently, they are PNG. The originals are PPT files that can be found at Earlier attempts to convert them to SVG resulted in poor-quality images. Proposed Solution: If anyone has the tools and expertise to convert the PNG/PPT to high-quality SVG that will look the same as the PNGs, we welcome the help. Page to Update: <!--Optional Information (remove the comment tags around the information you would like to include)--<!--Kubernetes Version:--<!--Additional Information:--
/assign If anyone gets to this first: great!
hey! looking to contribute to this project !..can I?
/triage accepted
I've made progress on this and hope to send in a PR later this week.

Related discussion:
text: Being vulnerable does not necessarily mean that your service will be exploited. Though your services are vulnerable in some ways unknown to you, offenders still need to identify these vulnerabilities and then exploit them. If offenders fail to exploit your service vulnerabilities, you win! In other words, having a vulnerability that can’t be exploited, represents a risk that can’t be realized. <del> {{< figure src="Example.png" alt="Image of an example of offender gaining foothold in a service" class="diagram-large" caption="Figure 1. An Offender gaining foothold in a vulnerable service" >}} </del> <ins> {{< figure src="security_behavior_figure_1.svg" alt="Image of an example of offender gaining foothold in a service" class="diagram-large" caption="Figure 1. An Offender gaining foothold in a vulnerable service" >}} </ins> The above diagram shows an example in which the offender does not yet have a foothold in the service; that is, it is assumed that your service does not run code controlled by the offender on day 1. In our example the service has vulnerabilities in the API exposed to clients. To gain an initial foothold the offender uses a malicious client to try and exploit one of the service API vulnerabilities. The malicious client sends an exploit that triggers some unplanned behavior of the service.
Code change:
This is a Bug Report <!-- Thanks for filing an issue! Before submitting, please fill in the following information. --<!-- See for guidance on writing an actionable issue description. --<!--Required Information--Problem: The image files in need to be converted to an SVG. Currently, they are PNG. The originals are PPT files that can be found at Earlier attempts to convert them to SVG resulted in poor-quality images. Proposed Solution: If anyone has the tools and expertise to convert the PNG/PPT to high-quality SVG that will look the same as the PNGs, we welcome the help. Page to Update: <!--Optional Information (remove the comment tags around the information you would like to include)--<!--Kubernetes Version:--<!--Additional Information:--
/assign If anyone gets to this first: great!
hey! looking to contribute to this project !..can I?
/triage accepted
I've made progress on this and hope to send in a PR later this week.

Related discussion:
text: Kubernetes is often used to support workloads designed with microservice architecture. By design, microservices aim to follow the UNIX philosophy of "Do One Thing And Do It Well". Each microservice has a bounded context and a clear interface. In other words, you can expect the microservice clients to send relatively regular requests and the microservice to present a relatively regular behavior as a response to these requests. Consequently, a microservice architecture is an excellent candidate for security-behavior monitoring. <del> {{< figure src="Microservices.png" alt="Image showing why microservices are well suited for security-behavior monitoring" class="diagram-large" caption="Figure 2. Microservices are well suited for security-behavior monitoring" >}} </del> <ins> {{< figure src="security_behavior_figure_2.svg" alt="Image showing why microservices are well suited for security-behavior monitoring" class="diagram-large" caption="Figure 2. Microservices are well suited for security-behavior monitoring" >}} </ins> The diagram above clarifies how dividing a monolithic service to a set of microservices improves our ability to perform security-behavior monitoring and control. In a monolithic service approach, different client requests are intertwined, resulting in a diminished ability to identify irregular client behaviors. Without prior knowledge, an observer of the intertwined client requests will find it hard to distinguish between types of requests and their related characteristics. Further, internal client requests are not exposed to the observer. Lastly, the aggregated behavior of the monolithic service is a compound of the many different internal behaviors of its components, making it hard to identify irregular service behavior.
Code change:
This is a Feature Request What would you like to be Add the commands which are under the Clean up section of the and tutorials into the shell code block snippet. Currently, it is under the triple backticks () as shown in the following screenshot: ! ! Which is not look more prominent. Why is this needed It provides a better structure to the section. and then it will be highlighted on the page. Comments None
This issue is currently awaiting triage. SIG Docs takes a lead on issue triage for this website, but any Kubernetes member can accept issues by applying the label. The label can be by org members by writing in a comment. <detailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available . If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the repository. </details
/sig docs /language en
/assign
Fixed it here:
I'm not sure I agree with the issue description. I was nevertheless happy to merge the actual PR.
thank you, I opened this for the content so that commands under Cleanup should more clear like others command mentioned on the page.

Related discussion:
text: ## Clean up <del> Run `kind delete cluster --name psa-with-cluster-pss` and `kind delete cluster --name psa-wo-cluster-pss` to delete the clusters you created. </del> <ins> Now delete the clusters which you created above by running the following command: ```shell kind delete cluster --name psa-with-cluster-pss ``` ```shell kind delete cluster --name psa-wo-cluster-pss ``` </ins> ## {{% heading "whatsnext" %}}
Code change:
This is a Feature Request What would you like to be Add the commands which are under the Clean up section of the and tutorials into the shell code block snippet. Currently, it is under the triple backticks () as shown in the following screenshot: ! ! Which is not look more prominent. Why is this needed It provides a better structure to the section. and then it will be highlighted on the page. Comments None
This issue is currently awaiting triage. SIG Docs takes a lead on issue triage for this website, but any Kubernetes member can accept issues by applying the label. The label can be by org members by writing in a comment. <detailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available . If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the repository. </details
/sig docs /language en
/assign
Fixed it here:
I'm not sure I agree with the issue description. I was nevertheless happy to merge the actual PR.
thank you, I opened this for the content so that commands under Cleanup should more clear like others command mentioned on the page.

Related discussion:
text: ## Clean up <del> Run `kind delete cluster --name psa-ns-level` to delete the cluster created. </del> <ins> Now delete the cluster which you created above by running the following command: ```shell kind delete cluster --name psa-ns-level ``` </ins> ## {{% heading "whatsnext" %}}
Code change:
The docs on currently make no mention of field validation. Now that of unknown and duplicate fields is graduating to GA, we should mention it briefly here.
/cc
/triage accepted
/wg api-expression /language en /priority important-longterm /sig api-machinery
/assign

Related discussion:
text: Different kinds of object can also have different `.status`; again, the API reference pages detail the structure of that `.status` field, and its content for each different type of object. <ins> ## Server side field validation Starting with Kubernetes v1.25, the API server offers server side [field validation](/docs/reference/using-api/api-concepts/#field-validation) that detects unrecognized or duplicate fields in an object. It provides all the functionality of `kubectl --validate` on the server side. The `kubectl` tool uses the `--validate` flag to set the level of field validation. It accepts the values `ignore`, `warn`, and `strict` while also accepting the values `true` (equivalent to `strict`) and `false` (equivalent to `ignore`). The default validation setting for `kubectl` is `--validate=true`. `Strict` : Strict field validation, errors on validation failure `Warn` : Field validation is performed, but errors are exposed as warnings rather than failing the request `Ignore` : No server side field validation is performed When `kubectl` cannot connect to an API server that supports field validation it will fall back to using client-side validation. Kubernetes 1.27 and later versions always offer field validation; older Kubernetes releases might not. If your cluster is older than v1.27, check the documentation for your version of Kubernetes. </ins> ## {{% heading "whatsnext" %}} If you're new to Kubernetes, read more about the following:
Code change:
This is a Bug Report <!-- Thanks for filing an issue! Before submitting, please fill in the following information. --<!-- See for guidance on writing an actionable issue description. --<!--Required Information--Problem: Link for Federation in is broken Proposed Solution: Should be updated with correct link Page to Update: <!--Optional Information (remove the comment tags around information you would like to include)--<!--Kubernetes Version:--<!--Additional Information:--
This issue is currently awaiting triage. SIG Docs takes a lead on issue triage for this website, but any Kubernetes member can accept issues by applying the label. The label can be by org members by writing in a comment. <detailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available . If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the repository. </details
/area blog
/assign
/language en

Related discussion:
text: Kubernetes provides great primitives for deploying applications to a cluster: it can be as simple as `kubectl create -f app.yaml`. Deploy apps across multiple clusters has never been that simple. How should app workloads be distributed? Should the app resources be replicated into all clusters, replicated into selected clusters, or partitioned into clusters? How is  access to the clusters managed? What happens if some of the resources that a user wants to distribute pre-exist, in some or all of the clusters, in some form? <del> In SIG Multicluster, our journey has revealed that there are multiple possible models to solve these problems and there probably is no single best-fit, all-scenario solution. [Federation](/docs/concepts/cluster-administration/federation/), however, is the single biggest Kubernetes open source sub-project, and has seen the maximum interest and contribution from the community in this problem space. The project initially reused the Kubernetes API to do away with any added usage complexity for an existing Kubernetes user. This approach was not viable, because of the problems summarised below: </del> <ins> In SIG Multicluster, our journey has revealed that there are multiple possible models to solve these problems and there probably is no single best-fit, all-scenario solution. [Kubernetes Cluster Federation (KubeFed for short)](https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/kubefed), however, is the single biggest Kubernetes open source sub-project, and has seen the maximum interest and contribution from the community in this problem space. The project initially reused the Kubernetes API to do away with any added usage complexity for an existing Kubernetes user. This approach was not viable, because of the problems summarised below: </ins> * Difficulties in re-implementing the Kubernetes API at the cluster level, as federation-specific extensions were stored in annotations. * Limited flexibility in federated types, placement and reconciliation, due to 1:1 emulation of the Kubernetes API.
Code change:
This is a Feature Request After release, we don't need . We should update the instructions on the task to include verification using cosign 2.0 <!-- Please only use this template for submitting feature/enhancement requests --<!-- See for guidance on writing an actionable issue description. --What would you like to be <details<summaryverification using cosign 2.0</summaryAdd a note if cosign version < 2.0 </details<!-- Describe as precisely as possible how this feature/enhancement should work from the user perspective. What should be changed, etc. --Why is this needed There are some breaking changes in cosign 2.0 and we should update the instruction for the verification of images. Comments <!-- Any additional related comments that might help. Drawings/mockups would be extremely helpful (if required). --
/sig release /sig security /retitle Update page Verify Signed Kubernetes Artifacts for cosign 2.0 /kind bug /remove-kind feature /language en /triage accepted Thanks
:+1:
I can work on this /assign
Hey Are you still working on this issue? If not, can I work on this?
Haven't gotten to it as I expected to. Please feel free to work on it /unassign
/assign
FYI
Apologies for not being able to review the PR. I am going through University exams which is ending tomorrow. I just rushed through the changes that you made and you really did awesome work on this. I'll look more into this after the exams. Thanks for working on this.

Related discussion:
text: ## {{% heading "prerequisites" %}} <del> These instructions are for Kubernetes {{< skew currentVersion >}}. If you want to check the integrity of components for a different version of Kubernetes, check the documentation for that Kubernetes release. </del> You will need to have the following tools installed: - `cosign` ([install guide](https://docs.sigstore.dev/cosign/installation/)) - `curl` (often provided by your operating system) <ins> - `jq` ([download jq](https://stedolan.github.io/jq/download/)) </ins> ## Verifying binary signatures
Code change:
This is a Feature Request After release, we don't need . We should update the instructions on the task to include verification using cosign 2.0 <!-- Please only use this template for submitting feature/enhancement requests --<!-- See for guidance on writing an actionable issue description. --What would you like to be <details<summaryverification using cosign 2.0</summaryAdd a note if cosign version < 2.0 </details<!-- Describe as precisely as possible how this feature/enhancement should work from the user perspective. What should be changed, etc. --Why is this needed There are some breaking changes in cosign 2.0 and we should update the instruction for the verification of images. Comments <!-- Any additional related comments that might help. Drawings/mockups would be extremely helpful (if required). --
/sig release /sig security /retitle Update page Verify Signed Kubernetes Artifacts for cosign 2.0 /kind bug /remove-kind feature /language en /triage accepted Thanks
:+1:
I can work on this /assign
Hey Are you still working on this issue? If not, can I work on this?
Haven't gotten to it as I expected to. Please feel free to work on it /unassign
/assign
FYI
Apologies for not being able to review the PR. I am going through University exams which is ending tomorrow. I just rushed through the changes that you made and you really did awesome work on this. I'll look more into this after the exams. Thanks for working on this.

Related discussion:
text: done ``` <del> Then verify the blob by using `cosign`: </del> <ins> Then verify the blob by using `cosign verify-blob`: </ins> ```shell <del> cosign verify-blob "$BINARY" --signature "$BINARY".sig --certificate "$BINARY".cert </del> <ins> cosign verify-blob "$BINARY"  --signature "$BINARY".sig  --certificate "$BINARY".cert  --certificate-identity krel-staging@k8s-releng-prod.iam.gserviceaccount.com  --certificate-oidc-issuer https://accounts.google.com </ins> ``` <del> cosign v1.9.0 is required to be able to use the `--certificate` flag. Please use `--cert` for older versions of cosign. </del> {{< note >}} <del> To learn more about keyless signing, please refer to [Keyless Signatures](https://github.com/sigstore/cosign/blob/main/KEYLESS.md#keyless-signatures). </del> <ins> Cosign 2.0 requires the `--certificate-identity` and `--certificate-oidc-issuer` options. To learn more about keyless signing, please refer to [Keyless Signatures](https://docs.sigstore.dev/cosign/keyless). Previous versions of Cosign required that you set `COSIGN_EXPERIMENTAL=1`. For additional information, plase refer to the [sigstore Blog](https://blog.sigstore.dev/cosign-2-0-released/) </ins> {{< /note >}} ## Verifying image signatures
Code change:
This is a Bug Report Problem: The versions of the cri-tools and cni-plugins dependencies was updated in packages, but not in the documentation: Proposed Solution: Update the versions, to match what is in the deb/rpm packages. Currently they are not pinned, but installs the latest: Compared with the deb installation: Page to Update: Kubernetes Version: 27.0 <!--Additional Information:--Related:
/sig cluster-lifecycle /help
This request has been marked as needing help from a contributor. Please ensure that the issue body includes answers to the following questions: Why are we solving this issue? To address this issue, are there any code changes? If there are code changes, what needs to be done in the code and what places can the assignee treat as reference points? Does this issue have zero to low barrier of entry? How can the assignee reach out to you for help? For more details on the requirements of such an issue, please see and ensure that they are met. If this request no longer meets these requirements, the label can be removed by commenting with the command. <detailsIn response to : /sig cluster-lifecycle /help Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available . If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the repository. </details
/triage accepted /priority backlog
/assign
/unassign

Related discussion:
text: Install CNI plugins (required for most pod network): ```bash <del> CNI_PLUGINS_VERSION="v1.1.1" </del> <ins> CNI_PLUGINS_VERSION="v1.2.0" </ins> ARCH="amd64" DEST="/opt/cni/bin" sudo mkdir -p "$DEST"
Code change:
This is a Bug Report Problem: The versions of the cri-tools and cni-plugins dependencies was updated in packages, but not in the documentation: Proposed Solution: Update the versions, to match what is in the deb/rpm packages. Currently they are not pinned, but installs the latest: Compared with the deb installation: Page to Update: Kubernetes Version: 27.0 <!--Additional Information:--Related:
/sig cluster-lifecycle /help
This request has been marked as needing help from a contributor. Please ensure that the issue body includes answers to the following questions: Why are we solving this issue? To address this issue, are there any code changes? If there are code changes, what needs to be done in the code and what places can the assignee treat as reference points? Does this issue have zero to low barrier of entry? How can the assignee reach out to you for help? For more details on the requirements of such an issue, please see and ensure that they are met. If this request no longer meets these requirements, the label can be removed by commenting with the command. <detailsIn response to : /sig cluster-lifecycle /help Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available . If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the repository. </details
/triage accepted /priority backlog
/assign
/unassign

Related discussion:
text: Install crictl (required for kubeadm / Kubelet Container Runtime Interface (CRI)) ```bash <del> CRICTL_VERSION="v1.25.0" </del> <ins> CRICTL_VERSION="v1.26.0" </ins> ARCH="amd64" curl -L "https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/cri-tools/releases/download/${CRICTL_VERSION}/crictl-${CRICTL_VERSION}-linux-${ARCH}.tar.gz" | sudo tar -C $DOWNLOAD_DIR -xz ```