Change:
Pre the first alpha cut of 1.24, a blog post should be drafted expressing the project's understanding that many users have not migrated off of dockershim, and migration can be painful but its needed for a variety of reasons and we are committed to documenting and making it as easy as possible. /assign (For visibility) /assign sig-arch / sig-node (please loop in / assign others) /assign (for myself to keep track of) /sig node architecture /priority important-soon /area blog
:100: /triage accepted
hoping can cover for me! also cc
/assign
I started the draft, which is super rough and doesnt' have all the outline yet:
IMO the draft is in a good enough place to be converted to a PR.

Discussion:
slug: are-you-ready-for-dockershim-removal --- <ins> {{< note >}} This poll will close on January 7, 2022. {{</ note >}} </ins> **Author:** Sergey Kanzhelev, Google. With reviews from Davanum Srinivas, Elana Hashman, Noah Kantrowitz, Rey Lejano. Last year we announced that Dockershim is being deprecated: [Dockershim Deprecation FAQ](/blog/2020/12/02/dockershim-faq/).

At this point, we believe that there is feature parity between Docker and the other runtimes. Many end-users have used our [migration guide](/docs/tasks/administer-cluster/migrating-from-dockershim/) and are running production workload using these different runtimes. The plan of <del> record today is that dockershim will be removed in version 1.24, slated for </del> <ins> record today is that dockershim will be removed in version 1.24, slated for </ins> release around April of next year. For those developing or running alpha and beta versions, dockershim will be removed in December at the beginning of the 1.24 release development cycle.

<ins> --- layout: blog title: "Kubernetes is Moving on From Dockershim: Commitments and Next Steps" date: 2022-01-07 slug: kubernetes-is-moving-on-from-dockershim --- **Authors:** Sergey Kanzhelev (Google), Jim Angel (Google), Davanum Srinivas (VMware), Shannon Kularathna (Google), Chris Short (AWS), Dawn Chen (Google) Kubernetes is removing dockershim in the upcoming v1.24 release. We're excited to reaffirm our community values by supporting open source container runtimes, enable a smaller kubelet, and increase engineering velocity for teams using Kubernetes. If you [use Docker Engine as a Container Runtime](/docs/tasks/administer-cluster/migrating-from-dockershim/find-out-runtime-you-use/) for your Kubernetes cluster, get ready to migrate to 1.24! To check if you're affected, refer to [Check whether dockershim deprecation affects you](/docs/tasks/administer-cluster/migrating-from-dockershim/check-if-dockershim-deprecation-affects-you/). ## Why we’re moving away from dockershim Docker was the first container runtime used by Kubernetes. This is one of the reasons why Docker is so familiar to many Kubernetes users and enthusiasts. As containerization became an industry standard, the Kubernetes project added support for additional runtimes. This culminated with the implementation of the container runtime interface (CRI), letting system components (like the kubelet) talk to container runtimes in a standardized way. As a result, the hardcoded support for Docker – a component the project refers to as dockershim – became an anomaly in the Kubernetes project. Dependencies on Docker and dockershim have crept into various tools and projects in the CNCF ecosystem ecosystem, resulting in fragile code. By removing the dockershim CRI, we're embracing the first value of CNCF: "[Fast is better than slow](https://github.com/cncf/foundation/blob/master/charter.md#3-values)". Stay tuned for future communications on the topic! ## Deprecation timeline We [formally announced](/blog/2020/12/08/kubernetes-1-20-release-announcement/) the dockershim deprecation in December 2020.  Full removal is targeted in Kubernetes 1.24, in April 2022. This timeline aligns with our [deprecation policy](/docs/reference/using-api/deprecation-policy/#deprecating-a-feature-or-behavior), which states that deprecated behaviors must function for at least 1 year after their announced deprecation. We'll support Kubernetes version 1.23, which includes dockershim, for another year in the Kubernetes project. Managed Kubernetes providers, vendor support is likely to last even longer, but this is dependent on the companies themselves. Regardless, we're confident all cluster operations will have time to migrate. If you have more questions about the dockershim removal, refer to the [Dockershim Deprecation FAQ](/dockershim). We asked you whether you feel prepared for the migration from dockershim in this survey: [Are you ready for Dockershim removal](/blog/2021/11/12/are-you-ready-for-dockershim-removal/). We had over 600 responses. To everybody who took time filling out the survey, thank you. The results show that we still have a lot of ground to cover to help you to migrate smoothly. Other container runtimes exist, and have been promoted extensively. However, many users told us they still rely on dockershim, and sometimes have dependencies that need to be re-worked. Some of these dependencies are outside of your control. Based on the feedback received from you, here are some of the steps we are taking to help. ## Our next steps Based on the feedback you provided: - CNCF and the 1.24 release team are committed to delivering documentation in time for the 1.24 release. This includes more informative blog posts like this one, updating existing code samples, tutorials, and tasks, and producing a migration guide for cluster operators. - We are reaching out to the rest of the CNCF community to help prepare them for this change. If you're part of a project with dependencies on dockershim, or if you're interested in helping with the migration effort, please join us! There's always room for more contributors, whether to our transition tools or to our documentation. To get started, say hello in [#sig-node](https://kubernetes.slack.com/archives/C0BP8PW9G) channel on [Kuberentes Slack](https://slack.kubernetes.io/)! ## Final thoughts As a project, we've already seen cluster operators increasingly adopt of other container runtimes through 2021. We believe there are no major blockers to migration. The steps we're taking to improve the migration experience will light the path more clearly for you. We understand that migration from dockershim is yet another action you may need to do to keep your Kubernetes infrastructure up to date. For most of you, this step will be straightforward and transparent. In some cases, you will encounter hiccups or issues. The community has discussed at length whether postponing the dockershim removal would be helpful. For example, we recently talked about it in the [SIG Node discussion on November 11th](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Ne57gvidMEWXR70OxxnRkYquAoMpt56o75oZtg-OeBg/edit#bookmark=id.r77y11bgzid) and in the [Kubernetes Steering committee meeting held on December 6th](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1qazwMIHGeF3iUh5xMJIJ6PDr-S3bNkT8tNLRkSiOkOU/edit#bookmark=id.m0ir406av7jx). We already [postponed](https://github.com/kubernetes/enhancements/pull/2481/) it once last year because the adoption rate of other runtimes was lower than we wanted, which also gave us more time to identify potential blocking issues. At this point, we believe that the value that you (and Kubernetes) gain from dockershim removal makes up for the migration effort you'll have. Start planning now to avoid surprises. We'll have more updates and guides before Kubernetes 1.24 is released. </ins>