Change:
According to the : "The scheduler bypasses any nodes that don't have any topologySpreadConstraints[].topologyKey present." However, the is:  "The scheduler bypasses any nodes that any don't have all topologySpreadConstraints[].topologyKey present." This is a bug as the implementation is not following . We expect the code implementation to align with the documentation's description. Read the documentation and the code. /sig scheduling of the on the branch, and of the on the branch <detailsNA </details<details</details<details</details<details</details<details</details
This issue is currently awaiting triage. If a SIG or subproject determines this is a relevant issue, they will accept it by applying the label and provide further guidance. The label can be by org members by writing in a comment. <detailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available . If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the repository. </details
pr in case documentation is upheld
I dont't think the implementation of func is not as expected. Perhaps we can optimize the document a bit. /cc
I don't understand what the issue is trying to point out. -return true if the node has all required . -bypasses a node that don't have any topologySpreadConstraints[*].topologyKey. Nothing looks wrong?
I also think there is no problem with code logic. According to doc, if one node only have one label that equal to , this node should not be bypassed. This sentence may be ambiguous. In fact, a node with labels that match all should not be bypassed by scheduler.
So, where's the ambiguousness of the doc? Yes, and it matches the doc's explanation.
This is where there might be ambiguity. means that if node only have one matched label, this node will not be bypassed. But in fact the node labels must match all(not one of) topologySpreadConstraints[].topologyKey. Maybe I misunderstood it as well because English is not my native language. Ignore me if I'm wrong.
Okay, I got what you wanted to say. This is... an interesting English question. For example, the sentence "I don't have any of those books"; I'd interpret it as "I have no book; I don't have book-a, don't have book-b... don't have book-z". On the other hand, the sentence "If any of the following conditions are not true, the alert is triggered", I'd interpret it as "if condition-a and b is true, but condition-c isn't true, the alert is triggered". I interpreted the topology spread's doc like the second one; if any of topologySpreadConstraints[].topologyKey aren't in the Node's label, the node is bypassed. I'm not sure which interpretation is natural for the native speakers (looks like ChatGPT has the same interpretation as me though), but at least we can say it's ambiguous. I guess it'd be clearer if we rephrase it to, for example, "The scheduler bypasses any nodes that is missing at least of of the required topologySpreadConstraints[].topologyKey in its label.". Feel free to raise a PR. /remove-kind bug /kind documentation
I agree that the sentence is a little ambiguous. But this is not a bug in the code. The implementation matches the original intent of the design. I suggest opening a bug in /website so that SIG Docs can advise on better wording.
/close
Closing this issue. <detailsIn response to : /close Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available . If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the repository. </details
Thanks for your swift response! We chose to post this here because we were unsure about the expected behavior and wanted to hear developers' opinions. Now that we have clarity, so we will open a bug issue in the /website.

Discussion:
// .. and other fields we don't care about.  Expand as necessary. } <del> // parseMetadataUUID reads JSON from OpenStack metadata server and parses </del> <ins> // parseMetadata reads JSON from OpenStack metadata server and parses </ins> // instance ID out of it. func parseMetadata(r io.Reader) (*Metadata, error) { var metadata Metadata