Change:
Test: [sig-node] Restart [Serial] [Slow] [Disruptive] Kubelet should correctly account for terminated pods after restart I've also seen on /kind flake /sig node Looks like occasionally we have a second 50m CPU pod hanging around on the node, blocking enough pods getting scheduled for the test: I'm a bit puzzled because no pods are listed as currently running when the node dumps debug info. Could be a bug?
another case [sig-node] Container Manager Misc [Serial] Validate OOM score adjustments [NodeFeature:OOMScoreAdj] affected the Restart test case, see the kubelet log, the kubelet-container-manager guaranteede9d81584 pod was received almost simultaneously with the restart-test pod
Since at 0316 21:25:08, the container of pod guaranteede9d81584 has just been creating, but the test case [sig-node] Container Manager Misc [Serial] has already finished at 0316 21:25:06, so the test case check condition may be not strict
/triage accepted /assign
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs. This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules: After 90d of inactivity, is applied After 30d of inactivity since was applied, is applied After 30d of inactivity since was applied, the issue is closed You can: Mark this issue or PR as fresh with Mark this issue or PR as rotten with Close this issue or PR with Offer to help out with [Issue Triage][1] Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at . /lifecycle stale [1]:
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs. This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules: After 90d of inactivity, is applied After 30d of inactivity since was applied, is applied After 30d of inactivity since was applied, the issue is closed You can: Mark this issue or PR as fresh with Close this issue or PR with Offer to help out with [Issue Triage][1] Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at . /lifecycle rotten [1]:
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs. This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules: After 90d of inactivity, is applied After 30d of inactivity since was applied, is applied After 30d of inactivity since was applied, the issue is closed You can: Reopen this issue or PR with Mark this issue or PR as fresh with Offer to help out with [Issue Triage][1] Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at . /close [1]:
Closing this issue. <detailsIn response to : The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs. After 90d of inactivity, is applied After 30d of inactivity since was applied, is applied After 30d of inactivity since was applied, the issue is closedReopen this issue or PR with Mark this issue or PR as fresh with Offer to help out with [Issue Triage][1] Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available . If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the repository. </details

Discussion:
"strings" "time" <ins> e2epod "k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/framework/pod" testutils "k8s.io/kubernetes/test/utils" </ins> v1 "k8s.io/api/core/v1" "k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/api/resource" metav1 "k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/apis/meta/v1"

"k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/uuid" runtimeapi "k8s.io/cri-api/pkg/apis/runtime/v1" "k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/framework" <del> e2epod "k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/framework/pod" </del> imageutils "k8s.io/kubernetes/test/utils/image" admissionapi "k8s.io/pod-security-admission/api"

}, }, }) <ins> if err := e2epod.WaitForPodCondition(ctx, f.ClientSet, f.Namespace.Name, podName, "Ready", 120*time.Second, testutils.PodRunningReady); err != nil { framework.ExpectNoError(err, fmt.Sprintf("Pod %v could not enter running/ready", podName)) } </ins> var ( ngPids []int err    error

} return nil <del> }, 2*time.Minute, time.Second*4).Should(gomega.BeNil()) </del> <ins> }, 30*time.Second, time.Second*4).Should(gomega.BeNil()) </ins> }) ginkgo.It("burstable container's oom-score-adj should be between [2, 1000)", func(ctx context.Context) {

}, }, }) <ins> if err := e2epod.WaitForPodCondition(ctx, f.ClientSet, f.Namespace.Name, podName, "Ready", 120*time.Second, testutils.PodRunningReady); err != nil { framework.ExpectNoError(err, fmt.Sprintf("Pod %v could not enter running/ready", podName)) } </ins> var ( wsPids []int err    error

} } return nil <del> }, 2*time.Minute, time.Second*4).Should(gomega.BeNil()) </del> <ins> }, 30*time.Second, time.Second*4).Should(gomega.BeNil()) </ins> // TODO: Test the oom-score-adj logic for burstable more accurately. })