jiebi/CodeConvo huggingface dataset:
Change:
The "reset" button went missing on the projects editor Any page with older style editor The reset button should be present. All
There is no need for a reset button here, you can just remove all code?
The cash register starts with code
I think we should have a reset button for the odin remix projects If a camper is a working through one of those challenges, and messes up their HTML, then they should have the ability to reset it. But also, for the JS certs, sometimes it is easier to just click reset and start with a clean slate. Plus the other editors have the reset button, so we should have it for consistency sake IMO.
This seems like a great place to start investigating in my opinion. These seem to be multifile cert projects after all.
Reopening, python final projects still miss the button

Discussion:
</Button> </> )} <del> {challengeType !== challengeTypes.multifilePythonCertProject && ( <> <Spacer size='xxSmall' /> <Button block={true} variant='primary' onClick={openResetModal}> {isMobile ? t('buttons.reset') : t('buttons.reset-lesson')} </Button> </> )} </del> <ins> <> <Spacer size='xxSmall' /> <Button block={true} variant='primary' onClick={openResetModal}> {isMobile ? t('buttons.reset') : t('buttons.reset-lesson')} </Button> </> </ins> <Spacer size='xxSmall' /> <Dropdown dropup> <Dropdown.Toggle
Change:
A camper on the forum was unable to pass the step. This was their code The failing test was this one js (code, /(')error-msg2/) The test needs to be updated to account of spacing see explanation above see explanation above No response Device: [e.g. iPhone 6, Laptop] OS: [e.g. iOS 14, Windows 10, Ubuntu 20.04] Browser: [e.g. Chrome, Safari] Version: [e.g. 22] No response
I'd like to pick this issue up
Any issue marked with the label is free to work on. We do not assign issues to anyone other than long-time contributors. If you would like to contribute and have not read the contributors docs, please do so here: If you have any issues with contributing, be sure to join us on the , or on the Happy coding

Discussion:
Your `p` element should have the class `error-msg`. ```js <del> assert.match(code, /(`|"|')<ps+class=("|')error-msg2>/) </del> <ins> assert.match(code, /(`|"|')<ps+classs*=s*("|')error-msg2>/) </ins> ``` Your `p` element should have the text `There was an error loading the authors`. ```js <del> assert.match(code, /(`|"|')<ps+class=("|')error-msg2>Theres+wass+ans+errors+loadings+thes+authors</p>1s*;?/) </del> <ins> assert.match(code, /(`|"|')<ps+classs*=s*("|')error-msg2>Theres+wass+ans+errors+loadings+thes+authors</p>1s*;?/) </ins> ```
Change:
A camper on the forum ran into an issue here They wanted to know why they couldn't pass with a regular function for the callback. the directions don't specify it should be an arrow function instead. but both answers should pass. So the tests should be updated. see explanation above see explanation above No response Device: [e.g. iPhone 6, Laptop] OS: [e.g. iOS 14, Windows 10, Ubuntu 20.04] Browser: [e.g. Chrome, Safari] Version: [e.g. 22] No response
Hi, Can I work on fixing this issue ? I would need some help in locally setting up so that I can test my code changes.

Discussion:
Your `.map()` method should take an empty callback function. ```js <del> assert.match(code, /arr.map(s*(s*)s*=>s*{s*}s*)/); </del> <ins> assert.match(code, /arr.map(s*((s*)s*=>|functions*(s*))s*{s*}s*)/); </ins> ``` You should use the `+=` operator on `playerCards.innerHTML`.

You should assign `arr.map()` to the `playerCards.innerHTML` using the `+=` operator. ```js <del> assert.match(code, /playerCards.innerHTMLs*+=s*arr.map(s*(s*)s*=>s*{s*}s*)/) </del> <ins> assert.match(code, /playerCards.innerHTMLs*+=s*arr.map(s*((s*)s*=>|functions*(s*))s*{s*}s*)/); </ins> ``` # --seed--
Change:
In the second paragraph of Step 47: Per my understanding of the text, the "or" (italic and bold) should be removed. There is nothing wrong with the testing for this step; it is just a typo. The "or" as pointed out above should be deleted. No response Device: [e.g. iPhone 6, Laptop] OS: [e.g. iOS 14, Windows 10, Ubuntu 20.04] Browser: [e.g. Chrome, Safari] Version: [e.g. 22] No response
Thanks for opening this issue. This looks something that can be fixed by "first time" code contributors to this repository. Here are the files that you should be looking at to work on a fix: List of files: Please make sure you read , we prioritize contributors following the instructions in our guides. Join us in or if you need help contributing, our moderators will guide you through this. Sometimes we may get more than one pull requests. We typically accept the most quality contribution followed by the one that is made first. Happy contributing.

Discussion:
In computer science, a <dfn>stack</dfn> is a data structure where items are stored in a <dfn>LIFO</dfn> (last-in-first-out) manner. If you imagine a stack of books, the last book you add to the stack is the first book you can take off the stack. Or an array where you can only `.push()` and `.pop()` elements. <del> The <dfn>call stack</dfn> is a collection of function calls stored in a stack structure. When you call a function, it is added to the top or of the stack, and when it returns, it is removed from the top / end of the stack. </del> <ins> The <dfn>call stack</dfn> is a collection of function calls stored in a stack structure. When you call a function, it is added to the top of the stack, and when it returns, it is removed from the top / end of the stack. </ins> You'll see this in action by creating mock call stack.
Change:
In step 28 of the date formatter project, the hint shows the solution, which is not hard to explain. This might not be ideal for learning, as a camper (especially a JS) beginner can go ahead and copy the solution from the hint without bothering to understand what the code does. ! N/A The solution should not be in the hint text because it can be described. We could go with something like this: If the text is too long, it is better to break the hint text and test into two. No response Device: [e.g. iPhone 6, Laptop] OS: [e.g. iOS 14, Windows 10, Ubuntu 20.04] Browser: [e.g. Chrome, Safari] Version: [e.g. 22] No response
The same text is in the description, it would make sense to change description to not give out answer at the start.
Based on the activity I have seen on the forum, I think campers will struggle with connecting "interpolate the , , , , and " with the desired format we are asking from them. I think it would be best to show them the desired format in the description. something like this for the description
So we should leave the hint as is and modify the description text?
for the hint text we could go with this
Ok. Let's open it up for contribution then.
This has been opened for contribution. The first comprehensive PR created will be reviewed and merged. We typically do not assign issues to anyone other than long-time contributors. If you would like to contribute and have not read the contributors docs, please do so here: If you have any issues with contributing, be sure to join us on the , or on the please use this for the updated description please use this for the updated hint text Happy coding

Discussion:
# --description-- <del> Inside the `case` for `mm-dd-yyyy-h-mm`, set the `textContent` property of `currentDateParagraph` to `${month}-${day}-${year} ${hours} Hours ${minutes} Minutes`. </del> <ins> When the user selects the `Month, Day, Year, Hours, Minutes` option from the dropdown, you need to display the date in the format `mm-dd-yyyy h Hours m Minutes`. Inside the `case` for `mm-dd-yyyy-h-mm`, use string interpolation to assign the formatted date from above to the `textContent` property of `currentDateParagraph`. Make sure to use the `month`, `day`, `year`, `hours`, and `minutes` variables in your answer. </ins> # --hints-- <del> You should assign `${month}-${day}-${year} ${hours} Hours ${minutes} Minutes` to the `textContent` property of `currentDateParagraph`. </del> <ins> Your answer should follow this format: `mm-dd-yyyy h Hours m Minutes`. Replace `mm`, `dd`, `yyyy`, `h`, and `m` with the `month`, `day`, `year`, `hours`, and `minutes` variables you created earlier. </ins> ```js const pattern = /cases*('|")mm-dd-yyyy-h-mm1s*:s*currentDateParagraph.textContents*=s*`(${month}-${day}-${year} ${hours} Hours ${minutes} Minutes)`/;
Change:
A camper on the forum was unable to pass the lesson this was their code the issue was here the tests only accept it if the label is on the next line like this see suggested fix down below about updating the editable regions see explanation above see explanation above No response Device: [e.g. iPhone 6, Laptop] OS: [e.g. iOS 14, Windows 10, Ubuntu 20.04] Browser: [e.g. Chrome, Safari] Version: [e.g. 22] No response
I remembered this issue here where there were issues with the newlines So, I feel like an easier fix would be to just fix the editable regions Here should be the new fix:
I'm going to flag this one for first-timers only.

Discussion:
return str.match(regex); } <del> --fcc-editable-region-- </del> function addEntry() { const targetInputContainer = document.querySelector(`#${entryDropdown.value} .input-container`); const entryNumber = targetInputContainer.querySelectorAll('input[type="text"]').length; const HTMLString = ` <ins> --fcc-editable-region-- </ins> <label>Entry ${entryNumber} Name</label>`; <ins> --fcc-editable-region-- </ins> } <del> --fcc-editable-region-- </del> ```
Change:
We should make the instructions a little clearer. Let's go with this suggestion from this forum post. ` see explanation above see explanation above No response Device: [e.g. iPhone 6, Laptop] OS: [e.g. iOS 14, Windows 10, Ubuntu 20.04] Browser: [e.g. Chrome, Safari] Version: [e.g. 22] No response
This has been opened for contribution. The first comprehensive PR created will be reviewed and merged. We typically do not assign issues to anyone other than long-time contributors. If you would like to contribute and have not read the contributors docs, please do so here: If you have any issues with contributing, be sure to join us on the , or on the Happy coding
I made a PR, but I can close it and let some else do it. It is a nice first time issue.
no worries. I am currently auditing some of the projects so there will be more first timers only issues coming up soon

Discussion:
You need to update the current song being played as well as the appearance of the `playButton` element. <del> Start by accessing the `userData` object and its `currentSong` property. Set its value equal to the `song` variable. </del> <ins> Assign `song` to the `currentSong` property on the `userData` object. </ins> *Note*: You should not use the optional chaining operator `?.` in this step because `userData.currentSong` will not be `null` or `undefined` at this point.
Change:
The description nor the tests mention the answer needs to use as demonstrated by this forum post here It is clear that the camper understood the assignment. So I don't think they should be penalized for using instead of so the tests should be updated to accept both see explanation above see explanation above No response Device: [e.g. iPhone 6, Laptop] OS: [e.g. iOS 14, Windows 10, Ubuntu 20.04] Browser: [e.g. Chrome, Safari] Version: [e.g. 22] No response

Discussion:
Your `sortSongs` function should use arrow function syntax. ```js <del> assert.match(code, /consts+sortSongss*=s*(s*)s*=>s*{s*}s*;?/) </del> <ins> assert.match(code, /const|lets+sortSongss*=s*(s*)s*=>s*{s*}s*;?/) </ins> ``` # --seed--
Change:
I struggled with the error message, see screenshot below. The error message asks challengers to use the variable, which I clearly did. So, it was not only unclear why the code didn't pass the test, but also misleading because the error message does not point to the real problem here: a second argument for (arg1, arg2) is missing. Since the instruction also doesn't provide a clear description of the syntax of (), I suggest that the syntax information of () be to the instruction. Albeit a minor issue, because anyone can look it up, I believe it would still make the instruction clearer. The error message should alert the challenger about a necessary second argument to pass in () if the variable is already passed in as the first argument. ! Device: Laptop OS: Windows 11 Browser: FireFox Version: 125.0.1 (64-bit) No response
For the new updated description, we could use this js (base, exponent) js const base = 4; const exponent = 0.5; // returns 2 (base, exponent); as for the hint text, it looks like the tests are broken up into two for In this case, I think it would be better to just have one test like this js (getStandardDeviation.toString(), /standardDeviations=sMath.pow(svariances,s1s/s2s)/);
Why step-51 in codebase is different also there is 58 steps showing when im running freecodecamp locally.But here there is only 55 steps.
The project is in beta which means the steps will be changing. So a recent update was made to the stats calculator project which means the step numbers were updated.

Discussion:
# --description-- <del> To calculate a root exponent, such as $sqrt[n]{x}$, you can use an inverted exponent $x^{1/n}$. </del> <ins> To calculate a root exponent, such as $sqrt[n]{x}$, you can use an inverted exponent $x^{1/n}$. JavaScript has a built-in `Math.pow()` function that can be used to calculate exponents. Here is the basic syntax for the `Math.pow()` function: ```js Math.pow(base, exponent); ``` Here is an example of how to calculate the square root of `4`: ```js const base = 4; const exponent = 0.5; // returns 2 Math.pow(base, exponent); ``` </ins> Declare a `standardDeviation` variable, and use the `Math.pow()` function to assign it the value of $variance^{1/2}$.

assert.match(getStandardDeviation.toString(), /standardDeviations*=s*Math.pow(/); ``` <del> Your `standardDeviation` variable should use the `variance` variable. ```js assert.match(getStandardDeviation.toString(), /standardDeviations*=s*Math.pow(s*variances*,/); ``` Your `standardDeviation` variable should use the `1/2` exponent. </del> <ins> Your `Math.pow()` function should have a base of `variance` and an exponent of `1/2`. </ins> ```js assert.match(getStandardDeviation.toString(), /standardDeviations*=s*Math.pow(s*variances*,s*1s*/s*2s*)/);
Change:
We had camper that was able to pass the test for step 44 of the pyramid project. However, they created an infinite loop with recursion because of this code here the initial starting code does make it seem like you are supposed to write your code inside the function Here are the current editiable regions but it should be changed to this to make it clearer for beginners where to write their code see explanation above see explanation above No response Device: [e.g. iPhone 6, Laptop] OS: [e.g. iOS 14, Windows 10, Ubuntu 20.04] Browser: [e.g. Chrome, Safari] Version: [e.g. 22] No response
This has been opened for contribution. The first comprehensive PR created will be reviewed and merged. We typically do not assign issues to anyone other than long-time contributors. If you would like to contribute and have not read the contributors docs, please do so here: If you have any issues with contributing, be sure to join us on the , or on the Happy coding
Can you please tell me where the file is in the repo?

Discussion:
const count = 8; const rows = []; <del> --fcc-editable-region-- </del> function padRow() { } <ins> --fcc-editable-region-- </ins> padRow(); --fcc-editable-region--
Change:
We should add scripts for running Playwright tests. In the root level , add these two scripts:
playwright and to the root level and passed all the tests need review to be merged @ you can check the pr

Discussion:
"test-tools": "jest tools", "test-utils": "jest utils", "postinstall": "cypress cache prune", <del> "prepare": "husky" </del> <ins> "prepare": "husky", "playwright:run": "playwright test", "playwright:watch": "playwright test --ui" </ins> }, "dependencies": { "dotenv": "16.4.5"
Change:
Wording in the description suggests a random number will appear in the console. The number generated is not random. It is a result of the calculation of the number of millisecond elapsed since January 1, 1970 00:00:00 UTC Remove the following text: On a new line, the following text to appear: ! Device: [e.g. iPhone 6, Laptop] OS: [e.g. iOS 14, Windows 10, Ubuntu 20.04] Browser: [e.g. Chrome, Safari] Version: [e.g. 22] No response
Hi, Can you mention the files where this change should be made.
This could be simplified to say "Open up the console to see the result"
This has been opened for contribution. The first comprehensive PR created will be reviewed and merged. We typically do not assign issues to anyone other than long-time contributors. If you would like to contribute and have not read the contributors docs, please do so here: If you have any issues with contributing, be sure to join us on the , or on the js (()); // ` Happy coding

Discussion:
console.log(Date.now()); // 1628586800000 ``` <del> To see the new result, click on the `"Add New Task"` button. Then add a title of `WALK DOG` and click on the `"Add Task"` button. Open up the console to see the result with a random number added. </del> <ins> To see the new result, click on the `"Add New Task"` button. Then add a title of `WALK DOG` and click on the `"Add Task"` button. Open up the console to see the result. </ins> # --hints--
Change:
We have had a few campers create the wrong variable name for step 22 of pyramid project. Here is an example A few campers are wanting to call it instead of . I think a change in directions will fix this. Here is the updated description here are the updates to the first two hints js (code, /popped/); js (code, /lets+popped/); see explanation above see explanation above No response Device: [e.g. iPhone 6, Laptop] OS: [e.g. iOS 14, Windows 10, Ubuntu 20.04] Browser: [e.g. Chrome, Safari] Version: [e.g. 22] No response
This has been opened for contribution. The first comprehensive PR created will be reviewed and merged. We typically do not assign issues to anyone other than long-time contributors. If you would like to contribute and have not read the contributors docs, please do so here: If you have any issues with contributing, be sure to join us on the , or on the Happy coding

Discussion:
When a method returns a value, you can think of it as giving the value back to you, making it available for use in other parts of your code. <del> Declare a `popped` variable, and assign it the result of `rows.pop()`. Then, log your `popped` variable. </del> <ins> Create a new variable called `popped` and assign it the result of `rows.pop()`. Then, log `popped` to the console. </ins> # --hints-- <del> You should declare a `popped` variable. </del> <ins> You should declare a variable called `popped`. </ins> ```js assert.match(code, /popped/); ``` <del> You should use `let` to declare your `popped` variable. </del> <ins> You should use `let` to declare your variable called `popped`. </ins> ```js assert.match(code, /lets+popped/);
Change:
Implicitly returning the callback passed into won't pass the test. This should pass at least for this step, and the following step as well. I found out later that curly brackets are missed here. The hint/error message is also not helpful here because the code provided above does exactly what the hint asks campers to do. I suggest adding "Please use curly brackets for the callback for this step" or modifying the corresponding test. ! Device: Laptop OS: Windows 11 Browser: FireFox Version: 125.0.2 (64-bit) No response
Yes, these two steps should be updated to allow for implicit returns.

Discussion:
You should have a `forEach` loop that iterates through the `platforms` array. ```js <del> assert.match(code, /ifs*(.*)s*{s+platforms.forEach(s*((.*)|[^s()]+)s*=>s*{s*(.*?)s*}s*)s*;?/); </del> <ins> assert.match(code, /ifs*(.*)s*{s+platforms.forEach(s*((.*)|[^s()]+)s*=>s*{?s*(.*?)s*}?s*)s*;?/); </ins> ``` You should use the subtraction assignment operator to subtract 5 from the platform's `x` position. ```js <del> assert.match(code, /platforms.forEach(s*((s*platforms*)|platform)s*=>s*{s*platform.position.xs*-=s*5s*;?s*}s*)s*;?/); </del> <ins> assert.match(code, /platforms.forEach(s*((s*platforms*)|platform)s*=>s*{?s*platform.position.xs*-=s*5s*;?s*}?s*)s*;?/); </ins> ``` # --seed--

You should add a `forEach` loop that iterates through the `platforms` array. ```js <del> assert.match(code, /elses+ifs*(.*)s*{s*platforms.forEach(s*((s*platforms*)|platform)s*=>s*{s*(.*?)s*}s*)s*;?/); </del> <ins> assert.match(code, /elses+ifs*(.*)s*{s*platforms.forEach(s*((s*platforms*)|platform)s*=>s*{?s*(.*?)s*}?s*)s*;?/); </ins> ``` You should use the addition assignment operator to add 5 to the platform's `x` position. ```js <del> assert.match(code, /platforms.forEach(s*((s*platforms*)|platform)s*=>s*{s*platform.position.xs*+=s*5s*;?s*}s*)s*;?/); </del> <ins> assert.match(code, /platforms.forEach(s*((s*platforms*)|platform)s*=>s*{?s*platform.position.xs*+=s*5s*;?s*}?s*)s*;?/); </ins> ``` # --seed--
Change:
There is a typo in the Hint Message of Step 15 of Building a Dice Game, as shown in the Screenshots area. I will raise a PR for it since it is just a typo. The hint message should display: "You should reassign an empty array to your diceValuesArr variable." ! Device: Laptop OS: Windows 11 Browser: FireFox Version: 125.0.2 (64-bit) No response

Discussion:
# --hints-- <del> You should reassign and empty array to your `diceValuesArr` variable. </del> <ins> You should reassign an empty array to your `diceValuesArr` variable. </ins> ```js assert.match(code, /consts+rollDices*=s*(s*)s*=>s*{s*diceValuesArrs*=s*[s*]s*;?/);
Change:
When working through the , mentions the following: And when passing the following solution: This hint shows up: This doesn't pass because is expecting the following: I think adding the hint "Remember to use the keyword." is a valid hint, just like in when the keyword is not in the solution. It may be repetitive, but I think the user should be informed for this possible mistake. It's already in other steps anyway. When passing the incorrect code from the above, add the "Remember to use the keyword." hint and validation. No response Device: Laptop OS: macOS 13.6.6 Browser: Chrome Version: 124 No response
We can open this up to since this is a small change This has been opened for contribution. The first comprehensive PR created will be reviewed and merged. We typically do not assign issues to anyone other than long-time contributors. If you would like to contribute and have not read the contributors docs, please do so here: If you have any issues with contributing, be sure to join us on the , or on the Change the last hint to be the following Happy coding
I can do it!

Discussion:
assert.match(afterCalculateTotal, /consts+taxs*=/); ``` <del> Assign the value of calling your new `.calculateTaxes()` method, passing `subTotal` as the argument, to the `tax` variable. </del> <ins> Assign the value of calling your new `.calculateTaxes()` method, passing `subTotal` as the argument, to the `tax` variable. Remember to use the `this` keyword. </ins> ```js const afterCalculateTotal = code.split('calculateTotal')[1];
Change:
Describe the bug The first sentence of description contains rogue letter 'y', which needs to be removed: This is something that can be fixed by "first time" code contributors to this repository. Here are the files that you should be looking at to work on a fix: Additional context Please make sure you read , we prioritize contributors following the instructions in our guides. Join us in or if you need help contributing, our moderators will guide you through this. Sometimes we may get more than one pull requests. We typically accept the most quality contribution followed by the one that is made first. Happy contributing.

Discussion:
# --description-- <del> In the Present Perfect Tense, y`for` and `since` are used to discuss time duration and starting points. </del> <ins> In the Present Perfect Tense, `for` and `since` are used to discuss time duration and starting points. </ins> `For` tells how long something has been happening. `Since` tells when something started. # --fillInTheBlank--