Change:
To configure a KMS provider on the API server, include a provider of type ```kms``` in the providers array in the encryption configuration file and set the following properties: <del> * `name`: Display name of the KMS plugin. * `endpoint`: Listen address of the gRPC server (KMS plugin). The endpoint is a UNIX domain socket. * `cachesize`: Number of data encryption keys (DEKs) to be cached in the clear. When cached, DEKs can be used without another call to the KMS; whereas DEKs that are not cached require a call to the KMS to unwrap. * `timeout`: How long should kube-apiserver wait for kms-plugin to respond before returning an error (default is 3 seconds). </del> <ins> * `name`: Display name of the KMS plugin. * `endpoint`: Listen address of the gRPC server (KMS plugin). The endpoint is a UNIX domain socket. * `cachesize`: Number of data encryption keys (DEKs) to be cached in the clear. When cached, DEKs can be used without another call to the KMS; whereas DEKs that are not cached require a call to the KMS to unwrap. * `timeout`: How long should kube-apiserver wait for kms-plugin to respond before returning an error (default is 3 seconds). </ins> See [Understanding the encryption at rest configuration.](/docs/tasks/administer-cluster/encrypt-data)

Discussion:
This is a Bug Report <!-- Thanks for filing an issue! Before submitting, please fill in the following information. --<!-- See for guidance on writing an actionable issue description. --<!--Required Information--Problem: There are indentation errors in the yaml files of EncryptionConfiguration. For example in the following yaml, lines after "- secrets" should indent two to the right. ! Proposed Solution: Correct the indentation errors. Page to Update: <!--Optional Information (remove the comment tags around information you would like to include)--<!--Kubernetes Version:--<!--Additional Information:--
Is it right to have in the fixed page?
I checked the preview page, and it's still wrong. I've close my PR.
It should looks like this or "secrets" is the subcontent of the second "resources", and "providers" is with the same level of the second "resources". Although I modified the markdown, the rendered webpage is still wrong.
/priority backlog /language en /help
This request has been marked as needing help from a contributor. Please ensure the request meets the requirements listed . If this request no longer meets these requirements, the label can be removed by commenting with the command. <detailsIn response to : /priority backlog /language en /help Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available . If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the repository. </details
Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity. Mark the issue as fresh with . Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close. If this issue is safe to close now please do so with . Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or . /lifecycle stale
Stale issues rot after 30d of inactivity. Mark the issue as fresh with . Rotten issues close after an additional 30d of inactivity. If this issue is safe to close now please do so with . Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or . /lifecycle rotten
/remove-lifecycle rotten /assign