Change:
image: redis:3.2-alpine ``` <del> The below yaml snippet of the webserver deployment has `podAntiAffinity` and `podAffinity` configured. This informs the scheduler that all its replicas are to be co-located with pods that have selector label `app=store`. This will also ensure that each web-server replica does not co-locate on a single node. </del> <ins> The following Deployment for the web servers creates replicas with the label `app=web-store`. The Pod affinity rule tells the scheduler to place each replica on a node that has a Pod with the label `app=store`. The Pod anti-affinity rule tells the scheduler to avoid placing multiple `app=web-store` servers on a single node. </ins> ```yaml apiVersion: apps/v1

Discussion:
Page: This page could use a review and update for consistency, clarity, and style. Some sections read like tasks instead of conceptual information, and there's a few areas where the headings and readability are not in line with our style guidelines. /assign /sig docs /triage accepted /language en /kind cleanup
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs. This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules: After 90d of inactivity, is applied After 30d of inactivity since was applied, is applied After 30d of inactivity since was applied, the issue is closed You can: Mark this issue or PR as fresh with Mark this issue or PR as rotten with Close this issue or PR with Offer to help out with [Issue Triage][1] Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at . /lifecycle stale [1]:
/lifecycle frozen

This is a Bug Report <!-- Thanks for filing an issue! Before submitting, please fill in the following information. --<!-- See for guidance on writing an actionable issue description. --<!--Required Information--Problem: The description provide in the following section is somewhat missing out the details. It is not justifying the value of weight one should configure in the affinity section of a deployment. Proposed Solution: It would be best if this page can contain a legitimate example around the weight in Node affinity. Page to Update: <!--Optional Information (remove the comment tags around information you would like to include)--<!--Kubernetes Version:--v1.18 <!--Additional Information:--What is the significance of weight: 1 as compared to weight: 100 ? Creating first issue in GIT, apologies if I have missed out something. Would be happy to hear from you.
/language en /sig scheduling
Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity. Mark the issue as fresh with . Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close. If this issue is safe to close now please do so with . Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or . /lifecycle stale
Stale issues rot after 30d of inactivity. Mark the issue as fresh with . Rotten issues close after an additional 30d of inactivity. If this issue is safe to close now please do so with . Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or . /lifecycle rotten
/remove-lifecycle rotten
Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity. Mark the issue as fresh with . Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close. If this issue is safe to close now please do so with . Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or . /lifecycle stale
Stale issues rot after 30d of inactivity. Mark the issue as fresh with . Rotten issues close after an additional 30d of inactivity. If this issue is safe to close now please do so with . Send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at .

/lifecycle rotten
/remove-lifecycle rotten
/priority backlog
From what I understand, the scheduler iterates through each field for each matched affinity term and computes a sum, then places pods in nodes that meet the scheduling requirements by order of highest weight sum. Is this correct?
Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity. Mark the issue as fresh with . Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close. If this issue is safe to close now please do so with . Send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at . /lifecycle stale
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs. This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules: After 90d of inactivity, is applied After 30d of inactivity since was applied, is applied After 30d of inactivity since was applied, the issue is closed You can: Mark this issue or PR as fresh with Close this issue or PR with Offer to help out with [Issue Triage][1] Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at . /lifecycle rotten [1]:
fixes this.
/remove-lifecycle rotten
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs. This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules: After 90d of inactivity, is applied After 30d of inactivity since was applied, is applied After 30d of inactivity since was applied, the issue is closed You can: Mark this issue or PR as fresh with Mark this issue or PR as rotten with Close this issue or PR with Offer to help out with [Issue Triage][1] Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at . /lifecycle stale [1]:
/remove-lifecycle stale
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs. This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules: After 90d of inactivity, is applied After 30d of inactivity since was applied, is applied After 30d of inactivity since was applied, the issue is closed You can: Mark this issue or PR as fresh with Mark this issue or PR as rotten with Close this issue or PR with Offer to help out with [Issue Triage][1] Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at .