Change:
ssc.podLister = podInformer.Lister() ssc.podListerSynced = podInformer.Informer().HasSynced <del> setInformer.Informer().AddEventHandlerWithResyncPeriod( </del> <ins> setInformer.Informer().AddEventHandler( </ins> cache.ResourceEventHandlerFuncs{ AddFunc: ssc.enqueueStatefulSet, UpdateFunc: func(old, cur interface{}) {

Discussion:
<!-- Please only use this template for submitting enhancement requests --/area controller-manager What would you like to be : Don't resync statefulset in statefulset controller. Why is this needed: There are 2000+ sts in my k8s cluster, thus when i create a new sts, it takes a lot of time to create it's pod, i found that every sts will cost 40ms to sync it, then 2000 sts will cost 80s, and there is also a statefulSetResyncPeriod to resync all sts, I don't know why there need to have statefulSetResyncPeriod to resync all sts? Can we not resync sts and just watch it's changes?
/sig api-machinery
/remove-sig api-machinery /sig apps /sig scalability
the resync pattern is followed by all controllers to account for bugs in watch mechanism or missed notification due to any other reason. I dont think the individual controllers resync period is configurable or we could increase it . Also i am not sure if the current scale limits of 2000 StatefulSets is supported FYI
I have three cluster, A has 20 sts, B has 1300 sts and C has 2300 sts. I set kube-controller-manager loglevel to 4 and find that the cost of processing every sts is 2ms,30ms,45ms. Can we record the processed object into a processed cache and every time we get a new object to precess, we can compare it with the item in the cache, if they are same, then we don't need to sync it.
The "resync pattern" doesn't help with watch bugs (resync is done purely from internal cache, so in hypothetical situation that we missed watch event, it won't help at all). Resync-period should basically be used only in controllers that also sync some external things (like load-balancers), and watching changes of those is impossible. Unless I'm not missing anything, resync period can be safely dropped in this case.
I think all the controllers have the same problem because of the sharedinformerfactory has a default resync period if we don't set it to 0 in the config file. Also if there are more sts, the consumption for every sts will be larger.
interesting, but the resync is only happening for k8s objects.

Why is watching changes on those impossible ? And when you say external things you mean loadbalancers in gcloud ? resync is only happening for k8s services corresponding to those loadbalancers , right ? Or may be you are saying that if a k8s services is linked to a gcloud loadbalancer, the resync enables the controller code to go and check gcloud if the loadbalancing is provisioned or has anything changed there ? We need to document this in somwhere much like the apiconventions doc
- I mean loadbalancer in GCP as an example (but can also be other load balancer, persistent volumes in cloud or things like that). Yes - we resync on k8s objects, but that that let's you sync those. As an example - imagine service of type LoadBalancer - if you're periodically syncing the k8s service object, this triggers the operation of syncing the load-balancer (and we have an ability to check if it exists, is healthy etc.). - hmm, I would need to double check it, but I thought the default resync period is pretty long...
The default resync period is 12~24 hours. It is long but the bad experience will still happen every day.