Change:
- name: lib-modules hostPath: path: /lib/modules <ins> tolerations: - key: CriticalAddonsOnly operator: Exists - key: {{ .MasterTaintKey }} effect: NoSchedule nodeSelector: beta.kubernetes.io/arch: {{ .Arch }} </ins> ` )

Discussion:
<!-- This form is for bug reports and feature requests ONLY! If you're looking for help check and the . If this may be security issue, please disclose it privately via --Is this a BUG REPORT or FEATURE REQUEST?: What happened: After joining a new ppc64le node to the k8s cluster, the kube-proxy DaemonSet fails on the new node. What you expected to happen: It was expected that the kube-proxy DS would "just work" as it does when adding an amd64 node to the cluster. How to reproduce it (as minimally and precisely as possible): Set up an amd64 based k8s cluster, then join a ppc64le node (or any non-amd64 arch) to the cluster. See the pod fail via 'kubectl -n kube-system get pods' because it's pulling the amd64 kube-proxy docker image instead of the ppc64le image. Anything else we need to know?: The yaml for the DaemonSet specifies the image: <versionIt would be preferable to have a manifest so that the image in the DS could be specified as <versionand could "just work" on any platform. See: Environment: Kubernetes version (use ): v1.10.3 Cloud provider or hardware configuration: self - cluster installed via kubeadm OS (e.g. from /etc/os-release): NAME="Ubuntu" VERSION="16.04.3 LTS (Xenial Xerus)" ID=ubuntu IDLIKE=debian PRETTYNAME="Ubuntu 16.04.3 LTS" VERSIONID="16.04" HOMEURL="" SUPPORTURL="" BUGREPORTURL="" VERSIONCODENAME=xenial UBUNTU_CODENAME=xenial Kernel (e.g. ): N/A Install tools: N/A Others: N/A
if you are running multi-architecture nodes, your daemonsets should specify a node selector to limit their arch-specific image to run on matching nodes
/close
I am well aware that a node selector can be used. That is what we are doing now. But it is a hack. The default should "just work". Adding a new non-amd64 node should not result in kube-proxy immediately failing on it because the default daemon set is amd64 arch specific. If kube-proxy is meant to "just work" clusterwide, a node selector should not be needed.

Please use the manifest-tool so that the default "just works". Please see the weave-net plugin. They are using the manifest-tool and it "just works" on amd64 and ppc64le. Their daemon set does not require/use a nodeSelector.
The current kube-proxy daemon set implementation is not properly architected, IMHO. Please re-open this
Reiterating the mentions to trigger a notification: <detailsIn response to : The current kube-proxy daemon set implementation is not properly architected, IMHO. Please re-open this </details
ah, this was a comment about the kube-proxy image, not the daemonset functionality /reopen
the kube-proxy addon daemonset is probably the multi-arch kube-proxy image to support that daemonset might be
Looks like it's coming from here: /assign /sig cluster-lifecycle Lucas, Do we want to avoid the references?
A dirty workaround for this is to pull and rename to . The kube-proxy is running as daemonset, created during . That means the kube-proxy image arch keeps consistent with your master node. Currently we don't have a multi-arch kube-proxy image yet. We have to explicitly specify the right name, like .
Hi .. Yes, we just created a separate daemonset with a ppc64le node slector that refers to the ppc64le image directly. But it's a bit of a hack. That is why I opened this ticket looking for a multi-arch image. Thanks!
I don't know that mixed-ISA clusters are supported. cc
The requirement is: only use "" in DaemonSet yaml file, and the k8s will download the correct image according to the ARCH info. It's more about image registry's feature; and it seems some registries had supported that: .
Yeah, has already supported multi-arch. But actually all the images now are architecture specific, like and . We've not built any multi-arch images right now.
for the test images we have the ball rolling here - - so if you can do the same (or similar) for other images, that would be great!
I have pending PR in releases project for creating manifest for those -
The manifest images created in kubernetes/release should work for future released versions, but will they be created during CI testing?

if you see one of the jobs that pushes images say you can grep for that's basically from the same files that got changed in so i fully expect the images pushed to CI will reflect the changes made in 516.
please confirm that i am reading this right ^ :)
I was more concerned with ci jobs that do not use cross builds, such as https://k8s-
please open an issue about pushing manifests in CI as well