Change:
config.DialFromEndpointContainer("udp", config.NodeIP, config.NodeUDPPort, config.MaxTries, 0, config.EndpointHostnames()) }) <ins> // This test ensures that in a situation where multiple services exist with the same selector, // deleting one of the services does not affect the connectivity of the remaining service ginkgo.It("should function for multiple endpoint-Services with same selector", func() { config := e2enetwork.NewNetworkingTestConfig(f, false, false) ginkgo.By("creating a second service with same selector") svc2, httpPort := createSecondNodePortService(f, config) // original service should work ginkgo.By(fmt.Sprintf("dialing(http) %v (endpoint) --> %v:%v (config.clusterIP)", config.EndpointPods[0].Name, config.ClusterIP, e2enetwork.ClusterHTTPPort)) config.DialFromEndpointContainer("http", config.ClusterIP, e2enetwork.ClusterHTTPPort, config.MaxTries, 0, config.EndpointHostnames()) ginkgo.By(fmt.Sprintf("dialing(http) %v (endpoint) --> %v:%v (nodeIP)", config.EndpointPods[0].Name, config.NodeIP, config.NodeHTTPPort)) config.DialFromEndpointContainer("http", config.NodeIP, config.NodeHTTPPort, config.MaxTries, 0, config.EndpointHostnames()) // Dial second service ginkgo.By(fmt.Sprintf("dialing(http) %v (endpoint) --> %v:%v (svc2.clusterIP)", config.EndpointPods[0].Name, svc2.Spec.ClusterIP, e2enetwork.ClusterHTTPPort)) config.DialFromEndpointContainer("http", svc2.Spec.ClusterIP, e2enetwork.ClusterHTTPPort, config.MaxTries, 0, config.EndpointHostnames()) ginkgo.By(fmt.Sprintf("dialing(http) %v (endpoint) --> %v:%v (nodeIP)", config.EndpointPods[0].Name, config.NodeIP, httpPort)) config.DialFromEndpointContainer("http", config.NodeIP, httpPort, config.MaxTries, 0, config.EndpointHostnames()) ginkgo.By("deleting the original node port service") config.DeleteNodePortService() // Second service should continue to function unaffected ginkgo.By(fmt.Sprintf("dialing(http) %v (endpoint) --> %v:%v (svc2.clusterIP)", config.EndpointPods[0].Name, svc2.Spec.ClusterIP, e2enetwork.ClusterHTTPPort)) config.DialFromEndpointContainer("http", svc2.Spec.ClusterIP, e2enetwork.ClusterHTTPPort, config.MaxTries, 0, config.EndpointHostnames()) ginkgo.By(fmt.Sprintf("dialing(http) %v (endpoint) --> %v:%v (nodeIP)", config.EndpointPods[0].Name, config.NodeIP, httpPort)) config.DialFromEndpointContainer("http", config.NodeIP, httpPort, config.MaxTries, 0, config.EndpointHostnames()) }) </ins> ginkgo.It("should update endpoints: http", func() { config := e2enetwork.NewNetworkingTestConfig(f, false, false) ginkgo.By(fmt.Sprintf("dialing(http) %v --> %v:%v (config.clusterIP)", config.TestContainerPod.Name, config.ClusterIP, e2enetwork.ClusterHTTPPort))

Discussion:
What happened: indicates that we're missing an e2e test for. This specific issue is just a tracker to create a new E2E test that demonstrated .
/sig network
/assign
btw, should this be a part of conformance?
/triage unresolved Comment when the issue is assessed and confirmed. I am a bot run by vllry. ‍
If this issue has been triaged, please comment . If you aren't able to handle this issue, consider unassigning yourself and/or adding the label. I am a bot run by vllry. ‍
/remove-triage unresolved
I can start working on this.
Sure/ are you working full time on it ? If so I'll drop the issue from my work ... Otherwise we can collaborate as I already have some code for this. Let me know. Was hoping to have this done in the next week or so.
I would love to collaborate, especially if you already have some code. But if you want to drop this from your work, I don't mind taking it on full time either. I can pick up from where ever you left off.
ok, if youve got full bandwidth go for it. if make progress on it this wk ill just drop it . I actually dont know where my old branch is for this :), so i guess youll have to start from scratch. One thing to note ~ Might be seeing if any tests can be reused for this or extended in a simple way by just adding a secondary service, rather then writing a full blown test from scratch. Let me know how it goes thanks !
I will let you know how it progresses. Thanks !
thanks for getting this taken care of :) looks like the PR is LGTM.
Thanks for letting me take a stab at it!