Change:
} } <del> if !qosLimitsFound.HasAll(string(corev1.ResourceMemory), string(corev1.ResourceCPU)) { </del> <ins> if !qosLimitsFound.HasAll(string(core.ResourceMemory), string(core.ResourceCPU)) { </ins> isGuaranteed = false } } if len(requests) == 0 && len(limits) == 0 { <del> return corev1.PodQOSBestEffort </del> <ins> return core.PodQOSBestEffort </ins> } // Check is requests match limits for all resources. if isGuaranteed {

Discussion:
<!-- Please use this template while reporting a bug and provide as much info as possible. Not doing so may result in your bug not being addressed in a timely manner. Thanks! If the matter is security related, please disclose it privately via --What happened: In kubectl library, logic is not the same as the one in What you expected to happen: logic should be the same. How to reproduce it (as minimally and precisely as possible): Create a pod with a guaranteed QoS class and a best-effort QoS initcontainer. Anything else we need to know?: Environment: Kubernetes version (use ): Cloud provider or hardware configuration: OS (e.g: ): Kernel (e.g. ): Install tools: Network plugin and version (if this is a network-related bug): Others:
/sig cli
Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity. Mark the issue as fresh with . Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close. If this issue is safe to close now please do so with . Send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at . /lifecycle stale
/remove-lifecycle stale
Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity. Mark the issue as fresh with . Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close. If this issue is safe to close now please do so with . Send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at . /lifecycle stale
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs. This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules: After 90d of inactivity, is applied After 30d of inactivity since was applied, is applied After 30d of inactivity since was applied, the issue is closed You can: Mark this issue or PR as fresh with Close this issue or PR with Offer to help out with [Issue Triage][1] Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at . /lifecycle rotten [1]:
It seems to be duplicate functions here.
The intention for duplicates is coming from the fact that kubectl can't rely on packages from kuberentes main repository. Either way they should both be identical except for the fact that the internval version will use internal APIs, whereas kubectl's version will use versioned.

feel free to open a PR updating kubectl version updating it to match both versions.
/triage accepted /assign
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs. This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules: After 90d of inactivity, is applied After 30d of inactivity since was applied, is applied After 30d of inactivity since was applied, the issue is closed You can: Reopen this issue or PR with Mark this issue or PR as fresh with Offer to help out with [Issue Triage][1] Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at . /close [1]:
Closing this issue. <detailsIn response to : The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs. After 90d of inactivity, is applied After 30d of inactivity since was applied, is applied After 30d of inactivity since was applied, the issue is closedReopen this issue or PR with Mark this issue or PR as fresh with Offer to help out with [Issue Triage][1] Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available . If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the repository. </details