Change:
<ins> -----BEGIN CERTIFICATE----- MIICpjCCAY4CCQCZBiNB23olFzANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQsFADAUMRIwEAYDVQQDDAkx MjcuMC4wLjEwIBcNMjAwNjE0MTk0OTM4WhgPMjI5NDAzMzAxOTQ5MzhaMBQxEjAQ BgNVBAMMCTEyNy4wLjAuMTCCASIwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADggEPADCCAQoCggEB AMxIjMd58IhiiyK4VjmuCWBUZksSs1CcQuo5HSpOqogVZ+vR5mdJDZ56Pw/NSM5c RqOB3cvjGrxYQe/lKvo9D3UmWLcRKtxdlWxCfPekioJ25/dhGOxtBQcjtp/TSqTM txprwT4fvsVwiwaURFoCOivF4xjQFG0K1i3/m7CiMHODy67M1EfJDrM7Vv5XPIuJ VF8HhWBH2HiM25ak34XhxVTX8K97k6wO9OZ5GMqbYuVobTZrSRdiv8s95rkmik6P jn0ePKqSz6cXNXgXqTl11WtsuoGgjOdB8j/noqTF3m3z17sSBqqG/xBFuSFoNceA yBDb9ohbs8oY3NIZzyMrt8MCAwEAATANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQsFAAOCAQEAFgcaqRgv qylx4ogL5iUr0K2e/8YzsvH7zLHG6xnr7HxpR/p0lQt3dPlppECZMGDKElbCgU8f xVDdZ3FOxHTJ51Vnq/U5xJo+UOMJ4sS8fEH8cfNliSsvmSKzjxpPKqbCJ7VTnkW8 lonedCPRksnhlD1U8CF21rEjKsXcLoX5PsxlS4DX3PtO0+e8aUh9F4XyZagpejq8 0ttXkWd3IyYrpFRGDlFDxIiKx7pf+mG6JZ/ms6jloBSwwcz/Nkn5FMxiq75bQuOH EV+99S2du/X2bRmD1JxCiMDw8cMacIFBr6BYXsvKOlivwfHBWk8U0f+lVi60jWje PpKFRd1mYuEZgw== -----END CERTIFICATE----- </ins>

Discussion:
<!-- Please use this template while reporting a bug and provide as much info as possible. Not doing so may result in your bug not being addressed in a timely manner. Thanks! If the matter is security related, please disclose it privately via --What happened: With the exec credentials plugin configured in my kubeconf, and a stale/expired token present in the same file issuing e.g. triggers the authentication flow as handled by the plugin - once the flow is returned to kubectl (by printing the ExecCredential object) the new token is stored to the kubeconfig but not immediately used to resolve the request, leading to: Immediately issuing again works as kubectl now seem to use the credentials (token) stored following the first request. What you expected to happen: That kubectl would read the new token as fetched by the exec credential plugin and use it already for the first command issued. How to reproduce it (as minimally and precisely as possible): the kubernetes API server with the OIDC authenticator enabled. kubectl to use an exec credential plugin printing the token received out of band. that the token was indeed written to the kubeconf file. that the first kubectl command failed. that the next identical command succeeds. Anything else we need to know?: This works as expected when there is no token previously stored in the kubeconf - the behavior is only triggered when there is a token stored but it expired, or for whatever other reason not accepted by the API server. Environment: Kubernetes version (use ): 1.14, also tried with 1.17 Cloud provider or hardware configuration: OS (e.g: ): Mac OS for kubectl client Kernel (e.g. ): Install tools: Network plugin and version (if this is a network-related bug): Others:
/sig auth /sig cli
could you provide more details around how is configured. For example, it is unclear to me if you are using the built in oidc plugin or a custom exec plugin. I think you are using a custom exec plugin but its also trying to write tokens to the file (which it should not do)? /triage needs-information
Thanks for looking into it . You are indeed correct in your assumption that I'm using a which stores the token in the after retrieval. I'd love to learn why this should not be done, but the problem remains also without persisting the token after retrieval.

Basically the steps to reproduce could be reduced to these: containing an expired token. same configuring an exec plugin which retrieves a valid token out of band and echoes it. Expected behavior: The valid token retrieved is used for the subsequent authentication. Possibly expected behavior: The exec plugin flow not started (or exited with a warning) due to an expired token being present in the . Current behavior seems to acknowledge the invalid token and hence tries to retrieve a new, valid one - which it then discards as soon as it arrives.
Seems we can reduce it even further by removing the token altogether from the file and instead provide it directly. So the only step needed to reproduce is essentially this: configuring an exec plugin which retrieves a valid token out of band and echoes it as part of an . Now any will trigger the exec plugin to retrieve a valid token, but will still not use it for subsequent authentication.
This one is caused by config merging with clientcmd overrides: and exec.Auth not being in this switch:
Interesting, thanks Will add it to the switch along with some tests and if everything works out well I'll submit a PR next week.
Having spent some time on this in the debugger, it seems somewhat more intricate than I first thought. Turns out the exec plugin is executed whether the presented is invalid or valid - the exec action is actually called before the first call is even dispatched. This due to the exec credential plugin possibly being needed to setup the client certificate requested for the transport. Once the exec plugin's is called it assign the authenticators function to : ..which is then called when setting up the transport, thus triggering the exec plugin regardless of a token being present or not: Since the exec plugin has no way of knowing whether a token or a client certificate will be returned by the exec action, this kind of makes sense. It however defeats letting any present to override the exec plugin, which clearly seems to be the intent: Possible options here that I can think of: (and fix) behavior of letting override the exec plugin. This looks doable by adding a check for token auth early in the 's method body: But might be there are consequences to this I'm not aware of. the behavior of letting override the exec plugin being called.

third, more complex option, would be to keep the token override but dispatch to the exec credential plugin should the response from the first call with the token come back with a 401. This was what I originally believed was the intent as my first tests always included an invalid token. While this behavior seems nice I'm more and more thinking it may violate the principle of least surprise. Either you present a token and use that for auth or you let the exec plugin fetch the credentials for you. What do you guys think?
As a colleague just made me aware of, certain tools like kubetail seem to have kubectl call the exec plugin so many times that eventually the threshold of 1000 is reached and warn logs (exec:201) start spewing - even though no certificate (and hence no rotation) should be involved. This has me more convinced that the first option is the right one, skipping the client TLS ceremonies should a token be present for authentication.
Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity. Mark the issue as fresh with . Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close. If this issue is safe to close now please do so with . Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or . /lifecycle stale
/remove-lifecycle stale