Change:
// Cache may be overridden by API object with higher version, compare but ignore resource version. newCachedPVC := cachedPVC.DeepCopy() newCachedPVC.ResourceVersion = pvc.ResourceVersion <del> if !reflect.DeepEqual(newCachedPVC, pvc) { t.Errorf("cached PVC check failed [A-expected, B-got]:n%s", diff.ObjectDiff(pvc, cachedPVC)) </del> <ins> if diff := cmp.Diff(pvc, newCachedPVC); diff != "" { t.Errorf("cached PVC check failed (-want, +got):n%s", diff) </ins> } }

Discussion:
When scheduling pod, we encountered the following event , then the scheduler will backoff to reschedule again, but this add more waiting time. From the event message, we can see it is the PVC update conflict leads to the , so need to add retry logic on PVC updating.### Need to add retry logic on PVC updating, to avoid the backoff, to improve the scheduling efficiency. a PVC and then create Pod; scheduing; the PVC annotation or label before the Pod scheduled success; will encounter this issue. No response <details</details
This issue is currently awaiting triage. If a SIG or subproject determines this is a relevant issue, they will accept it by applying the label and provide further guidance. The label can be by org members by writing in a comment. <detailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available . If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the repository. </details
/sig storage note that this is not a supported client/server skew: Server Version: version.Info{Major:"1", Minor:"18+", GitVersion:"v1.18.4-tke.23", GitCommit:"", GitTreeState:"clean", BuildDate:"2022-03-15T09:25:31Z", GoVersion:"go1.15.10", Compiler:"gc", Platform:"linux/amd64"}
/sig scheduling
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs. This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules: After 90d of inactivity, is applied After 30d of inactivity since was applied, is applied After 30d of inactivity since was applied, the issue is closed You can: Mark this issue or PR as fresh with Mark this issue or PR as rotten with Close this issue or PR with Offer to help out with [Issue Triage][1] Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at . /lifecycle stale [1]:
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.

This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules: After 90d of inactivity, is applied After 30d of inactivity since was applied, is applied After 30d of inactivity since was applied, the issue is closed You can: Mark this issue or PR as fresh with Close this issue or PR with Offer to help out with [Issue Triage][1] Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at . /lifecycle rotten [1]:
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs. This bot triages issues according to the following rules: After 90d of inactivity, is applied After 30d of inactivity since was applied, is applied After 30d of inactivity since was applied, the issue is closed You can: Reopen this issue with Mark this issue as fresh with Offer to help out with [Issue Triage][1] Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at . /close not-planned [1]:
Closing this issue, marking it as "Not Planned". <detailsIn response to : The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs. After 90d of inactivity, is applied After 30d of inactivity since was applied, is applied After 30d of inactivity since was applied, the issue is closedReopen this issue with Mark this issue as fresh with Offer to help out with [Issue Triage][1] Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available . If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the repository. </details