Change:
}) framework.ExpectNoError(err) } <ins> func testRSScaleSubresources(f *framework.Framework) { ns := f.Namespace.Name c := f.ClientSet // Create webserver pods. rsPodLabels := map[string]string{ "name": "sample-pod", "pod":  WebserverImageName, } rsName := "test-rs" replicas := int32(1) ginkgo.By(fmt.Sprintf("Creating replica set %q that asks for more than the allowed pod quota", rsName)) rs := newRS(rsName, replicas, rsPodLabels, WebserverImageName, WebserverImage, nil) _, err := c.AppsV1().ReplicaSets(ns).Create(context.TODO(), rs, metav1.CreateOptions{}) framework.ExpectNoError(err) // Verify that the required pods have come up. err = e2epod.VerifyPodsRunning(c, ns, "sample-pod", false, replicas) framework.ExpectNoError(err, "error in waiting for pods to come up: %s", err) ginkgo.By("getting scale subresource") scale, err := c.AppsV1().ReplicaSets(ns).GetScale(context.TODO(), rsName, metav1.GetOptions{}) if err != nil { framework.Failf("Failed to get scale subresource: %v", err) } framework.ExpectEqual(scale.Spec.Replicas, int32(1)) framework.ExpectEqual(scale.Status.Replicas, int32(1)) ginkgo.By("updating a scale subresource") scale.ResourceVersion = "" // indicate the scale update should be unconditional scale.Spec.Replicas = 2 scaleResult, err := c.AppsV1().ReplicaSets(ns).UpdateScale(context.TODO(), rsName, scale, metav1.UpdateOptions{}) if err != nil { framework.Failf("Failed to put scale subresource: %v", err) } framework.ExpectEqual(scaleResult.Spec.Replicas, int32(2)) ginkgo.By("verifying the replicaset Spec.Replicas was modified") rs, err = c.AppsV1().ReplicaSets(ns).Get(context.TODO(), rsName, metav1.GetOptions{}) if err != nil { framework.Failf("Failed to get statefulset resource: %v", err) } framework.ExpectEqual(*(rs.Spec.Replicas), int32(2)) ginkgo.By("Patch a scale subresource") scale.ResourceVersion = "" // indicate the scale update should be unconditional scale.Spec.Replicas = 4    // should be 2 after "UpdateScale" operation, now Patch to 4 rsScalePatchPayload, err := json.Marshal(autoscalingv1.Scale{ Spec: autoscalingv1.ScaleSpec{ Replicas: scale.Spec.Replicas, }, }) framework.ExpectNoError(err, "Could not Marshal JSON for patch payload") _, err = c.AppsV1().ReplicaSets(ns).Patch(context.TODO(), rsName, types.StrategicMergePatchType, []byte(rsScalePatchPayload), metav1.PatchOptions{}, "scale") framework.ExpectNoError(err, "Failed to patch replicaset: %v", err) rs, err = c.AppsV1().ReplicaSets(ns).Get(context.TODO(), rsName, metav1.GetOptions{}) framework.ExpectNoError(err, "Failed to get replicaset resource: %v", err) framework.ExpectEqual(*(rs.Spec.Replicas), int32(4), "replicaset should have 4 replicas") } </ins>

Discussion:
[x] two weeks soak end date : 26 Feb 2021 According to this APIsnoop query, there are still some remaining RESOURCENAME endpoints which are untested. with this query you can filter untested endpoints by their category and eligiblity for conformance. e.g below shows a query to find all conformance eligible untested,stable,core endpoints Create a ReplicaSet with a static label Read the ReplicaSetScale Update the ReplicaSetScale Get the ReplicaSetScale to ensure it is updated Patch the ReplicaSetScale Read the ReplicaSetScale to ensure it is Patch Delete the Namespace and ReplicaSet Due to the complexity of setting up the resources for APIService we have used the current e2e test as template. It has been extended in a for review. example endpoint | useragent ----------------------------------------|
patchAppsV1NamespacedReplicaSetScale | (linux/amd64) kubernetes/$Format -- [sig-apps] ReplicaSet Replicaset should have a working scale subresource readAppsV1NamespacedReplicaSetScale | (linux/amd64) kubernetes/$Format -- [sig-apps] ReplicaSet Replicaset should have a working scale subresource replaceAppsV1NamespacedReplicaSetScale | (linux/amd64) kubernetes/$Format -- [sig-apps] ReplicaSet Replicaset should have a working scale subresource (3 rows) If a test with these calls gets merged, test coverage will go up by 3 points This test is also created with the goal of conformance promotion. /sig testing /sig architecture
/triage accepted
Presented in Conformance meeting of 9 Feb 2021 and it was agreed that that method see to achieve the purpose and a PR can be created. A similar approach would be taken for the DepoymentScale endpoints.
/reopen
Reopened this issue. <detailsIn response to : /reopen Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available . If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the repository. </details