Change:
// validation with resource counting, but we did this before QoS was even defined. // let's not make that mistake again with other resources now that QoS is defined. requiredSet := quota.ToSet(required).Intersection(validationSet) <del> missingSet := sets.NewString() </del> <ins> missingSetResourceToContainerNames := make(map[string]sets.String) </ins> for i := range pod.Spec.Containers { <del> enforcePodContainerConstraints(&pod.Spec.Containers[i], requiredSet, missingSet) </del> <ins> enforcePodContainerConstraints(&pod.Spec.Containers[i], requiredSet, missingSetResourceToContainerNames) </ins> } for i := range pod.Spec.InitContainers { <del> enforcePodContainerConstraints(&pod.Spec.InitContainers[i], requiredSet, missingSet) </del> <ins> enforcePodContainerConstraints(&pod.Spec.InitContainers[i], requiredSet, missingSetResourceToContainerNames) </ins> } <del> if len(missingSet) == 0 { </del> <ins> if len(missingSetResourceToContainerNames) == 0 { </ins> return nil } <del> return fmt.Errorf("must specify %s", strings.Join(missingSet.List(), ",")) </del> <ins> var resources = sets.NewString() for resource := range missingSetResourceToContainerNames { resources.Insert(resource) } var errorMessages = make([]string, 0, len(missingSetResourceToContainerNames)) for _, resource := range resources.List() { errorMessages = append(errorMessages, fmt.Sprintf("%s for: %s", resource, strings.Join(missingSetResourceToContainerNames[resource].List(), ","))) } return fmt.Errorf("must specify %s", strings.Join(errorMessages, "; ")) </ins> } // GroupResource that this evaluator tracks

Discussion:
I deployed a pod with and on a namesapace with a set with and elements and I get the error: The pod to be deployed Create a new namespace Create (using a manifest file named resource-quota-) and verify a named compute-resources Content of the resource-quota- file Create (using a manifest file named ) a pod named high-priority with the and for both and . Content of the file The pod is deployed correctly if I delete the <details</details<detailsaws </details<details</details<details</details<details</details<details</details
This issue is currently awaiting triage. If a SIG or subproject determines this is a relevant issue, they will accept it by applying the label and provide further guidance. The label can be by org members by writing in a comment. <detailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available . If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the repository. </details
/sig Scheduling
/wg API Expression
The label(s) cannot be applied, because the repository doesn't have them. <detailsIn response to : /wg API Expression Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available . If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the repository. </details
/wg <API Expression
The label(s) cannot be applied, because the repository doesn't have them. <detailsIn response to : /wg <API ExpressionInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available . If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the repository. </details
/wg "API Expression"
The label(s) cannot be applied, because the repository doesn't have them. <detailsIn response to : /wg "API Expression" Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available . If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the repository. </details
/wg APIExpression
The label(s) cannot be applied, because the repository doesn't have them. <detailsIn response to : /wg APIExpression Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available . If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the repository.

</details
/wg wg-api-expression
The label(s) cannot be applied, because the repository doesn't have them. <detailsIn response to : /wg wg-api-expression Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available . If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the repository. </details
hey, v1.18.20 is out of support now, you should try with a newer version. Besides, I tried with an old version v1.18.19, but worked as well.
Are u using some mutating webhook which inject some sidecar into the pod without setting resources fields?
It's probably that, but IDK which WebHook is doing that. The feature you suggested would really help.
hi the fix pr has been merged, maybe u could use it to locate which container is causing the problem.
Thanks