Change:
# --description-- <del> The inequality operator (`!=`) is the opposite of the equality operator. It means not equal and returns `false` where equality would return `true` and *vice versa*. Like the equality operator, the inequality operator will convert data types of values while comparing. </del> <ins> The inequality operator (`!=`) is the opposite of the equality operator. Inequality means not equal. The inequality operator returns `false` when the equality operator would return `true` and *vice versa*. Like the equality operator, the inequality operator will convert data types of values while comparing. </ins> **Examples**

Discussion:
There is a typo in the explanation of the inequality operator (!=). The current sentence is: "It means not equal and returns false where equality would return true and vice versa." This explanation is incorrect because the inequality operator (!=) should return true when two values are not equal and false when they are equal. Suggested correction: "It means not equal and returns true when two values are not equal, and false when they are equal." This adjustment correctly explains the behavior of the inequality operator (!=). The explanation of the inequality operator (!=) should clearly state that it returns true when two values are not equal and false when they are equal. ! Device: Laptop OS: Windows 10 This is a minor issue but could potentially confuse new learners. Correcting this would improve clarity for those studying JavaScript comparison operators.
I would like to work on this issue, please assign this issue to me
Hi , , could you please assign this issue to me? I'd like to work on it. Thanks!
This issue has not been triaged or opened for contributions. Also, we don't typically assign issue. Please consult the contributing guide.
Thank you for the clarification, . I appreciate your guidance on the contribution process. I will review the contributing guide to understand the triaging process better. If possible, could you provide more details on how I can contribute to this issue? Thanks again!
The sentence seems correct to me, where the equality operator would return true, the inequality operator would return false and vice versa
Yeah, seems accurate to me
Thank you for your feedback! I understand how the sentence might seem correct at first glance. However, the issue lies in the explanation of the inequality operator (). The sentence currently says: "The inequality operator means not equal and returns false where equality would return true and vice versa." This could be confusing because when two values are not equal, the inequality operator () should return true, not false. So, it would be clearer to state that the inequality operator returns true when the values are not equal. Would you agree that updating the sentence to reflect this distinction would make the explanation more accurate? Thanks again for your input!
That looks like GPT? Anyways, the sentence does in fact say that the inequality operator return the opposite of the equality operator.

The inequality operator ... returns false where equality would return true and vice versa. The sentence is correct in a literal sense. It may be clearer to split the sentence, but it is not incorrect. If we want to change it to make the current meaning more clear, I would say
A/C to me ..... The term "inequality" refers to the condition of not being equal, particularly in the context of comparing two values. When the two values do not match, or in other words, are not equal, we can say they are unequal. As a result, the != operator will return TRUE because the values are indeed not equal. Conversely, when the values match, the != operator will return FALSE, indicating that both values are equal....It's simple. Conclusion: Where equality fails, the != operator will yield TRUE as output. Conversely, where equality holds, the != operator will yield FALSE as output.
Yep, and that's what the current text says. But I don't love the compound sentence as it is written. The curriculum should generally favor simpler grammatical constructions.
it's on the legacy curriculum, if someone wants to propose a change and make a PR, go for it, but it will be low priority
If someone makes a PR, this is what I'd say
With this JavaScript issue, I learn English too. Thank you.
Can I work on this issue?