jiebi/CodeConvo huggingface dataset:
Code change:
Running clippy or build on the Vaultwarden code-base using breaks. It is broken since and still works on Tried to run before running this without luck. If you need any more information, please let me know. Vaultwarden: Working: Broken since: <!-- Include a backtrace in the code block by setting in your environment. E.g. . --<details<summary<strongBacktrace</strong</summary<p</p</details
Looks like this is a duplicate of , , , , , and Sorry for the clutter ;)

Related discussion:
text: <ins> // check-pass #![deny(named_arguments_used_positionally)] fn main() { let value: f64 = 314.15926; let digits_before_decimal = 1; let digits_after_decimal = 2; let width = digits_before_decimal + 1 + digits_after_decimal; println!( "{value:0>width$.digits_after_decimal$}", value = value, width = width, digits_after_decimal = digits_after_decimal, ); } </ins>
Code change:
<!-- Thank you for filing a bug report! Please provide a short summary of the bug, along with any information you feel relevant to replicating the bug. If you cannot produce a minimal reproduction case (something that would work in isolation), please provide the steps or even link to a repository that causes the problematic output to occur. --Given the following code: <!-- Please provide a link to --The current output is: <!-- The following is not always necessary. --Ideally the output should look like: Highlight to the user that the keywords and are mutually exclusive. Replace with . <!-- If the problem is not self-explanatory, please provide a rationale for the change. --<!-- If dramatically different output is caused by small changes, consider also adding them here. If you're using the stable version of the compiler, you should also check if the bug also exists in the beta or nightly versions. The output might also be different depending on the Edition. --<!-- TRIAGEBOTSTART --<!-- TRIAGEBOTASSIGNSTART --<!-- TRIAGEBOTASSIGNDATASTARTTRIAGEBOTASSIGNDATAEND --<!-- TRIAGEBOTASSIGNEND --<!-- TRIAGEBOTEND --
claim

Related discussion:
text: /// Parses an enum declaration. fn parse_item_enum(&mut self) -> PResult<'a, ItemInfo> { <ins> if self.token.is_keyword(kw::Struct) { let mut err = self.struct_span_err( self.prev_token.span.to(self.token.span), "`enum` and `struct` are mutually exclusive", ); err.span_suggestion( self.prev_token.span.to(self.token.span), "replace `enum struct` with", "enum", Applicability::MachineApplicable, ); if self.look_ahead(1, |t| t.is_ident()) { self.bump(); err.emit(); } else { return Err(err); } } </ins> let id = self.parse_ident()?; let mut generics = self.parse_generics()?; generics.where_clause = self.parse_where_clause()?;
Code change:
<!-- Thank you for filing a bug report! Please provide a short summary of the bug, along with any information you feel relevant to replicating the bug. If you cannot produce a minimal reproduction case (something that would work in isolation), please provide the steps or even link to a repository that causes the problematic output to occur. --Given the following code: <!-- Please provide a link to --The current output is: <!-- The following is not always necessary. --Ideally the output should look like: Highlight to the user that the keywords and are mutually exclusive. Replace with . <!-- If the problem is not self-explanatory, please provide a rationale for the change. --<!-- If dramatically different output is caused by small changes, consider also adding them here. If you're using the stable version of the compiler, you should also check if the bug also exists in the beta or nightly versions. The output might also be different depending on the Edition. --<!-- TRIAGEBOTSTART --<!-- TRIAGEBOTASSIGNSTART --<!-- TRIAGEBOTASSIGNDATASTARTTRIAGEBOTASSIGNDATAEND --<!-- TRIAGEBOTASSIGNEND --<!-- TRIAGEBOTEND --
claim

Related discussion:
text: <ins> // run-rustfix pub enum Range { //~^ ERROR `enum` and `struct` are mutually exclusive Valid { begin: u32, len: u32, }, Out, } fn main() { } </ins>
Code change:
<!-- Thank you for filing a bug report! Please provide a short summary of the bug, along with any information you feel relevant to replicating the bug. If you cannot produce a minimal reproduction case (something that would work in isolation), please provide the steps or even link to a repository that causes the problematic output to occur. --Given the following code: <!-- Please provide a link to --The current output is: <!-- The following is not always necessary. --Ideally the output should look like: Highlight to the user that the keywords and are mutually exclusive. Replace with . <!-- If the problem is not self-explanatory, please provide a rationale for the change. --<!-- If dramatically different output is caused by small changes, consider also adding them here. If you're using the stable version of the compiler, you should also check if the bug also exists in the beta or nightly versions. The output might also be different depending on the Edition. --<!-- TRIAGEBOTSTART --<!-- TRIAGEBOTASSIGNSTART --<!-- TRIAGEBOTASSIGNDATASTARTTRIAGEBOTASSIGNDATAEND --<!-- TRIAGEBOTASSIGNEND --<!-- TRIAGEBOTEND --
claim

Related discussion:
text: <ins> // run-rustfix pub enum struct Range { //~^ ERROR `enum` and `struct` are mutually exclusive Valid { begin: u32, len: u32, }, Out, } fn main() { } </ins>
Code change:
<!-- Thank you for filing a bug report! Please provide a short summary of the bug, along with any information you feel relevant to replicating the bug. If you cannot produce a minimal reproduction case (something that would work in isolation), please provide the steps or even link to a repository that causes the problematic output to occur. --Given the following code: <!-- Please provide a link to --The current output is: <!-- The following is not always necessary. --Ideally the output should look like: Highlight to the user that the keywords and are mutually exclusive. Replace with . <!-- If the problem is not self-explanatory, please provide a rationale for the change. --<!-- If dramatically different output is caused by small changes, consider also adding them here. If you're using the stable version of the compiler, you should also check if the bug also exists in the beta or nightly versions. The output might also be different depending on the Edition. --<!-- TRIAGEBOTSTART --<!-- TRIAGEBOTASSIGNSTART --<!-- TRIAGEBOTASSIGNDATASTARTTRIAGEBOTASSIGNDATAEND --<!-- TRIAGEBOTASSIGNEND --<!-- TRIAGEBOTEND --
claim

Related discussion:
text: <ins> error: `enum` and `struct` are mutually exclusive --> $DIR/issue-99625-enum-struct-mutually-exclusive.rs:3:5 | LL | pub enum struct Range { |     ^^^^^^^^^^^ help: replace `enum struct` with: `enum` error: aborting due to previous error </ins>
Code change:
<!-- Thank you for filing a bug report! Please provide a short summary of the bug, along with any information you feel relevant to replicating the bug. --I tried this code: This code should compile normally. Instead, this happened: In the function, T was already bounded by the trait which does have an associated item named . However, Rust complains that no associated item named was found for . <!-- If you're using the stable version of the compiler, you should also check if the bug also exists in the beta or nightly versions. --:
I did some digging and this might be related to Mind taking a look?
A fix exists here at but we're waiting on 's pending RPIT refactor work to fix this. In the mean time, developers who need this feature can use the branch in . https://rust-

Related discussion:
text: } else { if matches!(def_kind, DefKind::AnonConst) && tcx.lazy_normalization() { let hir_id = tcx.hir().local_def_id_to_hir_id(def_id.expect_local()); <ins> let parent_def_id = tcx.hir().get_parent_item(hir_id); </ins> if tcx.hir().opt_const_param_default_param_hir_id(hir_id).is_some() { // In `generics_of` we set the generics' parent to be our parent's parent which means that // we lose out on the predicates of our actual parent if we dont return those predicates here.
Code change:
<!-- Thank you for filing a bug report! Please provide a short summary of the bug, along with any information you feel relevant to replicating the bug. --I tried this code: This code should compile normally. Instead, this happened: In the function, T was already bounded by the trait which does have an associated item named . However, Rust complains that no associated item named was found for . <!-- If you're using the stable version of the compiler, you should also check if the bug also exists in the beta or nightly versions. --:
I did some digging and this might be related to Mind taking a look?
A fix exists here at but we're waiting on 's pending RPIT refactor work to fix this. In the mean time, developers who need this feature can use the branch in . https://rust-

Related discussion:
text: //        parent of generics returned by `generics_of` // // In the above code we want the anon const to have predicates in its param env for `T: Trait` <del> let item_def_id = tcx.hir().get_parent_item(hir_id); // In the above code example we would be calling `explicit_predicates_of(Foo)` here </del> <ins> // and we would be calling `explicit_predicates_of(Foo)` here return tcx.explicit_predicates_of(parent_def_id); } let parent_def_kind = tcx.def_kind(parent_def_id); if matches!(parent_def_kind, DefKind::OpaqueTy) { // In `instantiate_identity` we inherit the predicates of our parent. // However, opaque types do not have a parent (see `gather_explicit_predicates_of`), which means // that we lose out on the predicates of our actual parent if we dont return those predicates here. // // // fn foo<T: Trait>() -> impl Iterator<Output = Another<{ <T as Trait>::ASSOC }> > { todo!() } //                                                        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ the def id we are calling //                                                                            explicit_predicates_of on // // In the above code we want the anon const to have predicates in its param env for `T: Trait`. // However, the anon const cannot inherit predicates from its parent since it's opaque. // // To fix this, we call `explicit_predicates_of` directly on `foo`, the parent's parent. // In the above example this is `foo::{opaque#0}` or `impl Iterator` let parent_hir_id = tcx.hir().local_def_id_to_hir_id(parent_def_id.def_id); // In the above example this is the function `foo` let item_def_id = tcx.hir().get_parent_item(parent_hir_id); // In the above code example we would be calling `explicit_predicates_of(foo)` here </ins> return tcx.explicit_predicates_of(item_def_id); } }
Code change:
<!-- Thank you for filing a bug report! Please provide a short summary of the bug, along with any information you feel relevant to replicating the bug. --I tried this code: This code should compile normally. Instead, this happened: In the function, T was already bounded by the trait which does have an associated item named . However, Rust complains that no associated item named was found for . <!-- If you're using the stable version of the compiler, you should also check if the bug also exists in the beta or nightly versions. --:
I did some digging and this might be related to Mind taking a look?
A fix exists here at but we're waiting on 's pending RPIT refactor work to fix this. In the mean time, developers who need this feature can use the branch in . https://rust-

Related discussion:
text: <ins> // check-pass #![crate_type = "lib"] #![feature(generic_const_exprs)] #![allow(incomplete_features)] pub trait MyIterator { type Output; } pub trait Foo { const ABC: usize; } pub struct IteratorStruct<const N: usize>{ } pub struct Bar<const N: usize> { pub data: [usize; N] } impl<const N: usize> MyIterator for IteratorStruct<N> { type Output = Bar<N>; } pub fn test1<T: Foo>() -> impl MyIterator<Output = Bar<{T::ABC}>> where [(); T::ABC]: Sized { IteratorStruct::<{T::ABC}>{} } pub trait Baz<const N: usize>{} impl<const N: usize> Baz<N> for Bar<N> {} pub fn test2<T: Foo>() -> impl MyIterator<Output = impl Baz<{ T::ABC }>> where [(); T::ABC]: Sized { IteratorStruct::<{T::ABC}>{} } </ins>
Code change:
When using in the to enable profiling, having a local copy of is required. If no such copy is present, errors about missing libraries are emitted and the build fails. Expected behavior: Bootstrap initializes the submodule when is enabled. <!-- TRIAGEBOTSTART --<!-- TRIAGEBOTASSIGNSTART --<!-- TRIAGEBOTASSIGNDATASTARTTRIAGEBOTASSIGNDATAEND --<!-- TRIAGEBOTASSIGNEND --<!-- TRIAGEBOTEND --
This should be pretty easy to fix - call in if profiling is enabled.
claim

Related discussion:
text: builder.update_submodule(&Path::new("library").join("stdarch")); <ins> // Profiler information requires LLVM's compiler-rt if builder.config.profiler { builder.update_submodule(&Path::new("src/llvm-project")); } </ins> let mut target_deps = builder.ensure(StartupObjects { compiler, target }); let compiler_to_use = builder.compiler_for(compiler.stage, compiler.host, target);