jiebi/CodeConvo huggingface dataset:
Code change:
<!-- Thank you for finding an Internal Compiler Error! If possible, try to provide a minimal verifiable example. You can read "Rust Bug Minimization Patterns" for how to create smaller examples. -- <!-- If you're using the stable version of the compiler, you should also check if the bug also exists in the beta or nightly versions. --: <!-- Include a backtrace in the code block by setting in your environment. E.g. . --<details<summary<strongBacktrace</strong</summary<p</p</detailsThis regressed in , previously it output a cycle error: label -I-ICE +I-crash +regression-from-stable-to-nightly
Bisection points to , but I don't have the context to determine which PR it was, maybe Assigning P-medium as this was already non-working code, and just the error message is a bit terse. label -I-prioritize +P-medium

Related discussion:
text: <ins> error[E0391]: cycle detected when computing layout of `Foo<()>` | = note: ...which requires computing layout of `<() as A>::Assoc`... = note: ...which again requires computing layout of `Foo<()>`, completing the cycle note: cycle used when elaborating drops for `main` --> $DIR/recursive-type-binding.rs:11:1 | LL | fn main() { | ^^^^^^^^^ = note: see https://rustc-dev-guide.rust-lang.org/overview.html#queries and https://rustc-dev-guide.rust-lang.org/query.html for more information error: aborting due to 1 previous error For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0391`. </ins>
Code change:
<!-- Thank you for finding an Internal Compiler Error! If possible, try to provide a minimal verifiable example. You can read "Rust Bug Minimization Patterns" for how to create smaller examples. -- <!-- If you're using the stable version of the compiler, you should also check if the bug also exists in the beta or nightly versions. --: <!-- Include a backtrace in the code block by setting in your environment. E.g. . --<details<summary<strongBacktrace</strong</summary<p</p</detailsThis regressed in , previously it output a cycle error: label -I-ICE +I-crash +regression-from-stable-to-nightly
Bisection points to , but I don't have the context to determine which PR it was, maybe Assigning P-medium as this was already non-working code, and just the error message is a bit terse. label -I-prioritize +P-medium

Related discussion:
text: <ins> // build-fail //~^ ERROR cycle detected when computing layout of `Foo<()>` // Regression test for a stack overflow: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/113197 trait A { type Assoc; } impl A for () { type Assoc = Foo<()>; } struct Foo<T: A>(T::Assoc); fn main() { Foo::<()>(todo!()); } </ins>
Code change:
<!-- Thank you for finding an Internal Compiler Error! If possible, try to provide a minimal verifiable example. You can read "Rust Bug Minimization Patterns" for how to create smaller examples. -- <!-- If you're using the stable version of the compiler, you should also check if the bug also exists in the beta or nightly versions. --: <!-- Include a backtrace in the code block by setting in your environment. E.g. . --<details<summary<strongBacktrace</strong</summary<p</p</detailsThis regressed in , previously it output a cycle error: label -I-ICE +I-crash +regression-from-stable-to-nightly
Bisection points to , but I don't have the context to determine which PR it was, maybe Assigning P-medium as this was already non-working code, and just the error message is a bit terse. label -I-prioritize +P-medium

Related discussion:
text: <ins> error[E0391]: cycle detected when computing layout of `Foo<()>` | = note: ...which requires computing layout of `<() as A>::Assoc`... = note: ...which again requires computing layout of `Foo<()>`, completing the cycle note: cycle used when elaborating drops for `main` --> $DIR/recursive-type-coercion-from-never.rs:14:1 | LL | fn main() { | ^^^^^^^^^ = note: see https://rustc-dev-guide.rust-lang.org/overview.html#queries and https://rustc-dev-guide.rust-lang.org/query.html for more information error: aborting due to 1 previous error For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0391`. </ins>
Code change:
<!-- Thank you for finding an Internal Compiler Error! If possible, try to provide a minimal verifiable example. You can read "Rust Bug Minimization Patterns" for how to create smaller examples. -- <!-- If you're using the stable version of the compiler, you should also check if the bug also exists in the beta or nightly versions. --: <!-- Include a backtrace in the code block by setting in your environment. E.g. . --<details<summary<strongBacktrace</strong</summary<p</p</detailsThis regressed in , previously it output a cycle error: label -I-ICE +I-crash +regression-from-stable-to-nightly
Bisection points to , but I don't have the context to determine which PR it was, maybe Assigning P-medium as this was already non-working code, and just the error message is a bit terse. label -I-prioritize +P-medium

Related discussion:
text: <ins> // check-pass trait A { type Assoc; } impl A for () { // FIXME: it would be nice for this to at least cause a warning. type Assoc = Foo<()>; } struct Foo<T: A>(T::Assoc); fn main() {} </ins>
Code change:
<!-- Thank you for finding an Internal Compiler Error! If possible, try to provide a minimal verifiable example. You can read "Rust Bug Minimization Patterns" for how to create smaller examples. --<!-- If you're using the stable version of the compiler, you should also check if the bug also exists in the beta or nightly versions. --: <!-- Include a backtrace in the code block by setting in your environment. E.g. . --<details<summary<strongBacktrace</strong</summary<p</p</details
cc
Thanks for the ping. It seems to be that here it's not always the parent which has , sometimes its on the as-is. I'm not entirely sure when we need the (IIRC it doesn't work for my test case if I don't add ).
Now if I stick to only using and not its parent, the line ICEs on my PR's test case because it can't find the param index for the . cc sorry for the ping, but do you know if here is special somehow? The debug path for my PR's test case seems to have another layer compared to this issue's ICE example, namely . I think this is why getting for my PR test case's parent worked but not for this ICE?
going to look into this, I think using is correct and the bug is somewhere else :sweat_smile:

Related discussion:
text: use rustc_hir as hir; use rustc_hir::def::Res; use rustc_hir::def_id::DefId; <del> use rustc_infer::traits::ObligationCauseCode; </del> <ins> use rustc_infer::{infer::type_variable::TypeVariableOriginKind, traits::ObligationCauseCode}; </ins> use rustc_middle::ty::{self, Ty, TyCtxt, TypeSuperVisitable, TypeVisitable, TypeVisitor}; use rustc_span::{self, symbol::kw, Span}; use rustc_trait_selection::traits;
Code change:
<!-- Thank you for finding an Internal Compiler Error! If possible, try to provide a minimal verifiable example. You can read "Rust Bug Minimization Patterns" for how to create smaller examples. --<!-- If you're using the stable version of the compiler, you should also check if the bug also exists in the beta or nightly versions. --: <!-- Include a backtrace in the code block by setting in your environment. E.g. . --<details<summary<strongBacktrace</strong</summary<p</p</details
cc
Thanks for the ping. It seems to be that here it's not always the parent which has , sometimes its on the as-is. I'm not entirely sure when we need the (IIRC it doesn't work for my test case if I don't add ).
Now if I stick to only using and not its parent, the line ICEs on my PR's test case because it can't find the param index for the . cc sorry for the ping, but do you know if here is special somehow? The debug path for my PR's test case seems to have another layer compared to this issue's ICE example, namely . I think this is why getting for my PR test case's parent worked but not for this ICE?
going to look into this, I think using is correct and the bug is somewhere else :sweat_smile:

Related discussion:
text: type BreakTy = ty::GenericArg<'tcx>; fn visit_ty(&mut self, ty: Ty<'tcx>) -> std::ops::ControlFlow<Self::BreakTy> { if let Some(origin) = self.0.type_var_origin(ty) <del> && let rustc_infer::infer::type_variable::TypeVariableOriginKind::TypeParameterDefinition(_, def_id) = origin.kind </del> <ins> && let TypeVariableOriginKind::TypeParameterDefinition(_, def_id) = origin.kind </ins> && let generics = self.0.tcx.generics_of(self.1) && let Some(index) = generics.param_def_id_to_index(self.0.tcx, def_id) && let Some(subst) = ty::GenericArgs::identity_for_item(self.0.tcx, self.1)
Code change:
<!-- Thank you for finding an Internal Compiler Error! If possible, try to provide a minimal verifiable example. You can read "Rust Bug Minimization Patterns" for how to create smaller examples. --<!-- If you're using the stable version of the compiler, you should also check if the bug also exists in the beta or nightly versions. --: <!-- Include a backtrace in the code block by setting in your environment. E.g. . --<details<summary<strongBacktrace</strong</summary<p</p</details
cc
Thanks for the ping. It seems to be that here it's not always the parent which has , sometimes its on the as-is. I'm not entirely sure when we need the (IIRC it doesn't work for my test case if I don't add ).
Now if I stick to only using and not its parent, the line ICEs on my PR's test case because it can't find the param index for the . cc sorry for the ping, but do you know if here is special somehow? The debug path for my PR's test case seems to have another layer compared to this issue's ICE example, namely . I think this is why getting for my PR test case's parent worked but not for this ICE?
going to look into this, I think using is correct and the bug is somewhere else :sweat_smile:

Related discussion:
text: let ty_vars = infcx_inner.type_variables(); let var_origin = ty_vars.var_origin(ty_vid); if let TypeVariableOriginKind::TypeParameterDefinition(name, def_id) = var_origin.kind <del> && !var_origin.span.from_expansion() </del> <ins> && name != kw::SelfUpper && !var_origin.span.from_expansion() </ins> { let generics = infcx.tcx.generics_of(infcx.tcx.parent(def_id)); let idx = generics.param_def_id_to_index(infcx.tcx, def_id).unwrap();
Code change:
<!-- Thank you for finding an Internal Compiler Error! If possible, try to provide a minimal verifiable example. You can read "Rust Bug Minimization Patterns" for how to create smaller examples. --<!-- If you're using the stable version of the compiler, you should also check if the bug also exists in the beta or nightly versions. --: <!-- Include a backtrace in the code block by setting in your environment. E.g. . --<details<summary<strongBacktrace</strong</summary<p</p</details
cc
Thanks for the ping. It seems to be that here it's not always the parent which has , sometimes its on the as-is. I'm not entirely sure when we need the (IIRC it doesn't work for my test case if I don't add ).
Now if I stick to only using and not its parent, the line ICEs on my PR's test case because it can't find the param index for the . cc sorry for the ping, but do you know if here is special somehow? The debug path for my PR's test case seems to have another layer compared to this issue's ICE example, namely . I think this is why getting for my PR test case's parent worked but not for this ICE?
going to look into this, I think using is correct and the bug is somewhere else :sweat_smile:

Related discussion:
text: // If there is only one implementation of the trait, suggest using it. // Otherwise, use a placeholder comment for the implementation. let (message, impl_suggestion) = if non_blanket_impl_count == 1 {( <del> "use the fully-qualified path to the only available implementation".to_string(), </del> <ins> "use the fully-qualified path to the only available implementation", </ins> format!("<{} as ", self.tcx.type_of(impl_def_id).instantiate_identity()) <del> )} else {( format!( "use a fully-qualified path to a specific available implementation ({} found)", non_blanket_impl_count ), "</* self type */ as ".to_string() </del> <ins> )} else { ("use a fully-qualified path to a specific available implementation", "</* self type */ as ".to_string() </ins> )}; let mut suggestions = vec![( path.span.shrink_to_lo(),
Code change:
<!-- Thank you for finding an Internal Compiler Error! If possible, try to provide a minimal verifiable example. You can read "Rust Bug Minimization Patterns" for how to create smaller examples. --<!-- If you're using the stable version of the compiler, you should also check if the bug also exists in the beta or nightly versions. --: <!-- Include a backtrace in the code block by setting in your environment. E.g. . --<details<summary<strongBacktrace</strong</summary<p</p</details
cc
Thanks for the ping. It seems to be that here it's not always the parent which has , sometimes its on the as-is. I'm not entirely sure when we need the (IIRC it doesn't work for my test case if I don't add ).
Now if I stick to only using and not its parent, the line ICEs on my PR's test case because it can't find the param index for the . cc sorry for the ping, but do you know if here is special somehow? The debug path for my PR's test case seems to have another layer compared to this issue's ICE example, namely . I think this is why getting for my PR test case's parent worked but not for this ICE?
going to look into this, I think using is correct and the bug is somewhere else :sweat_smile:

Related discussion:
text: LL |     let cont: u32 = Generator::create(); |                     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ cannot call associated function of trait | <del> help: use a fully-qualified path to a specific available implementation (2 found) </del> <ins> help: use a fully-qualified path to a specific available implementation </ins> | LL |     let cont: u32 = </* self type */ as Generator>::create(); |                     +++++++++++++++++++          +
Code change:
<!-- Thank you for finding an Internal Compiler Error! If possible, try to provide a minimal verifiable example. You can read "Rust Bug Minimization Patterns" for how to create smaller examples. --<!-- If you're using the stable version of the compiler, you should also check if the bug also exists in the beta or nightly versions. --: <!-- Include a backtrace in the code block by setting in your environment. E.g. . --<details<summary<strongBacktrace</strong</summary<p</p</details
cc
Thanks for the ping. It seems to be that here it's not always the parent which has , sometimes its on the as-is. I'm not entirely sure when we need the (IIRC it doesn't work for my test case if I don't add ).
Now if I stick to only using and not its parent, the line ICEs on my PR's test case because it can't find the param index for the . cc sorry for the ping, but do you know if here is special somehow? The debug path for my PR's test case seems to have another layer compared to this issue's ICE example, namely . I think this is why getting for my PR test case's parent worked but not for this ICE?
going to look into this, I think using is correct and the bug is somewhere else :sweat_smile:

Related discussion:
text: LL |     MyTrait2::my_fn(); |     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ cannot call associated function of trait | <del> help: use a fully-qualified path to a specific available implementation (2 found) </del> <ins> help: use a fully-qualified path to a specific available implementation </ins> | LL |     </* self type */ as MyTrait2>::my_fn(); |     +++++++++++++++++++         +
Code change:
<!-- Thank you for finding an Internal Compiler Error! If possible, try to provide a minimal verifiable example. You can read "Rust Bug Minimization Patterns" for how to create smaller examples. --<!-- If you're using the stable version of the compiler, you should also check if the bug also exists in the beta or nightly versions. --: <!-- Include a backtrace in the code block by setting in your environment. E.g. . --<details<summary<strongBacktrace</strong</summary<p</p</details
cc
Thanks for the ping. It seems to be that here it's not always the parent which has , sometimes its on the as-is. I'm not entirely sure when we need the (IIRC it doesn't work for my test case if I don't add ).
Now if I stick to only using and not its parent, the line ICEs on my PR's test case because it can't find the param index for the . cc sorry for the ping, but do you know if here is special somehow? The debug path for my PR's test case seems to have another layer compared to this issue's ICE example, namely . I think this is why getting for my PR test case's parent worked but not for this ICE?
going to look into this, I think using is correct and the bug is somewhere else :sweat_smile:

Related discussion:
text: <ins> // Regression test for #113610 where we ICEd when trying to print // inference variables created by instantiating the self type parameter. fn main() { let _ = (Default::default(),); //~^ ERROR cannot call associated function on trait } </ins>
Code change:
<!-- Thank you for finding an Internal Compiler Error! If possible, try to provide a minimal verifiable example. You can read "Rust Bug Minimization Patterns" for how to create smaller examples. --<!-- If you're using the stable version of the compiler, you should also check if the bug also exists in the beta or nightly versions. --: <!-- Include a backtrace in the code block by setting in your environment. E.g. . --<details<summary<strongBacktrace</strong</summary<p</p</details
cc
Thanks for the ping. It seems to be that here it's not always the parent which has , sometimes its on the as-is. I'm not entirely sure when we need the (IIRC it doesn't work for my test case if I don't add ).
Now if I stick to only using and not its parent, the line ICEs on my PR's test case because it can't find the param index for the . cc sorry for the ping, but do you know if here is special somehow? The debug path for my PR's test case seems to have another layer compared to this issue's ICE example, namely . I think this is why getting for my PR test case's parent worked but not for this ICE?
going to look into this, I think using is correct and the bug is somewhere else :sweat_smile:

Related discussion:
text: <ins> error[E0790]: cannot call associated function on trait without specifying the corresponding `impl` type --> $DIR/infer-var-for-self-param.rs:5:14 | LL |     let _ = (Default::default(),); |              ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ cannot call associated function of trait | help: use a fully-qualified path to a specific available implementation | LL |     let _ = (</* self type */ as Default>::default(),); |              +++++++++++++++++++        + error: aborting due to previous error For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0790`. </ins>
Code change:
Here is a very simple program which employs trait objects: : : : When this program is compiled and run, it fails with segmentation fault: This program is not correct. You can see that function produces a for arbitrary lifetime , but the local variable is valid only for body. A pointer to , however, is saved to the , and when it is accessed inside , a segmentation fault occurs. However, Rust still compiles it. I thought that borrowing checker should prevent this kind of errors. BTW, I can write or and it will compile either way, but I thought that when going from plain pointers to trait objects I should always specify exact kind of trait object. Not sure that I'm right here thought.
cc
Sounds similar to ; potential duplicate?
This appears to be fixed: Original example code updated to current rust: : : :
Awesome! flagging as needstest (not sure if one already exists)

Related discussion:
text: <ins> // Copyright 2014 The Rust Project Developers. See the COPYRIGHT // file at the top-level directory of this distribution and at // http://rust-lang.org/COPYRIGHT. // // Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 <LICENSE-APACHE or // http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0> or the MIT license // <LICENSE-MIT or http://opensource.org/licenses/MIT>, at your // option. This file may not be copied, modified, or distributed // except according to those terms. use std::io; use std::vec; pub struct Container<'a> { reader: &'a mut Reader //~ ERROR explicit lifetime bound required } impl<'a> Container<'a> { pub fn wrap<'s>(reader: &'s mut Reader) -> Container<'s> { Container { reader: reader } } pub fn read_to(&mut self, vec: &mut [u8]) { self.reader.read(vec); } } pub fn for_stdin<'a>() -> Container<'a> { let mut r = io::stdin(); Container::wrap(&mut r as &mut Reader) } fn main() { let mut c = for_stdin(); let mut v = vec::Vec::from_elem(10, 0u8); c.read_to(v.as_mut_slice()); } </ins>
Code change:
Here is a very simple program which employs trait objects: : : : When this program is compiled and run, it fails with segmentation fault: This program is not correct. You can see that function produces a for arbitrary lifetime , but the local variable is valid only for body. A pointer to , however, is saved to the , and when it is accessed inside , a segmentation fault occurs. However, Rust still compiles it. I thought that borrowing checker should prevent this kind of errors. BTW, I can write or and it will compile either way, but I thought that when going from plain pointers to trait objects I should always specify exact kind of trait object. Not sure that I'm right here thought.
cc
Sounds similar to ; potential duplicate?
This appears to be fixed: Original example code updated to current rust: : : :
Awesome! flagging as needstest (not sure if one already exists)

Related discussion:
text: <ins> // Copyright 2014 The Rust Project Developers. See the COPYRIGHT // file at the top-level directory of this distribution and at // http://rust-lang.org/COPYRIGHT. // // Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 <LICENSE-APACHE or // http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0> or the MIT license // <LICENSE-MIT or http://opensource.org/licenses/MIT>, at your // option. This file may not be copied, modified, or distributed // except according to those terms. fn blah() -> int { //~ ERROR not all control paths return a value 1i ; //~ NOTE consider removing this semicolon: } fn main() { } </ins>
Code change:
Here is a very simple program which employs trait objects: : : : When this program is compiled and run, it fails with segmentation fault: This program is not correct. You can see that function produces a for arbitrary lifetime , but the local variable is valid only for body. A pointer to , however, is saved to the , and when it is accessed inside , a segmentation fault occurs. However, Rust still compiles it. I thought that borrowing checker should prevent this kind of errors. BTW, I can write or and it will compile either way, but I thought that when going from plain pointers to trait objects I should always specify exact kind of trait object. Not sure that I'm right here thought.
cc
Sounds similar to ; potential duplicate?
This appears to be fixed: Original example code updated to current rust: : : :
Awesome! flagging as needstest (not sure if one already exists)

Related discussion:
text: <ins> // Copyright 2014 The Rust Project Developers. See the COPYRIGHT // file at the top-level directory of this distribution and at // http://rust-lang.org/COPYRIGHT. // // Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 <LICENSE-APACHE or // http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0> or the MIT license // <LICENSE-MIT or http://opensource.org/licenses/MIT>, at your // option. This file may not be copied, modified, or distributed // except according to those terms. #![feature(struct_variant)] mod a { pub enum Enum { EnumStructVariant { x: u8, y: u8, z: u8 } } pub fn get_enum_struct_variant() -> () { EnumStructVariant { x: 1, y: 2, z: 3 } //~^ ERROR mismatched types: expected `()`, found `a::Enum` (expected (), found enum a::Enum) } } mod b { mod test { use a; fn test_enum_struct_variant() { let enum_struct_variant = ::a::get_enum_struct_variant(); match enum_struct_variant { a::EnumStructVariant { x, y, z } => { //~^ ERROR error: mismatched types: expected `()`, found a structure pattern } } } } } fn main() {} </ins>