jiebi/CodeConvo huggingface dataset:
Code change:
Describe the bug Trying to rebuild from git master and it complains about fonttools and python version mismatch. To Reproduce Metadata Please run and paste the result. root nix run -c nix-info -m system: host os: multi-user?: sandbox: version: nixpkgs: channels(root): Maintainer information:
Looks like an issue with trying to build it with Python 2.7.x. The code isn't entirely compatible with Python 3.x nevertheless.
The issue seems to be with nototools which we currently have disabled for python3. The last nototools release is apparently fully compatible with python3. I'm working on a fix for this, however, the build now has a strange relationship with noto-fonts that I haven't quite figured out yet.
In the latest release nototools seems to still fail, or at least does on mine. The only relationship I found is that nototools is a dependency on noto-fonts.
you mean when running , or something similar? That's expected since nototools has been disabled for python3 (python3 support has only recently been upstream). I believe the relationship is actually that nototools is a dep of noto-fonts-emoji. The current nototools seems to require noto-fonts as a dep. I've gotten most of the way to a fix I think (changed nototools version and enabled py3 and what we fetch with the fetchZip in noto-fonts). However, the way that nototools expects noto-fonts is pretty strange (as an example look at the top level makefile where it looks for the noto-fonts repo in nototools' parent directory). I'm having a bit of trouble getting noto-fonts in the form nototools expects. I'm trying not to just copy the entire noto-fonts source into nototools source which seems like it should be unnecessary. Once nototools is fixed for python3 the rest should be easy bc we can just change noto-fonts etc to use python3. If you have any thoughts on how to fix nototools I'd love to hear them, or if you think I'm missing something here pls do let me know.
should be a dependency of the derivation. I'm not sure where you're seeing the fact that needs as a dependency. The farthest I've gotten is removing all the errors from the configuration but the build still fails with .
You mean that it should be a dependency of or it is currently? In regard to "is currently" I don't see it as currently being a dependency. The only place appears in noto- is in the following lines as part of derivation. If you mean it should be, then how you get to build on its own? If you change the nototools version to 0.2.0 which adds python3 support I get errors about missing font directories (these directories come from noto-fonts). What am I missing here?
Proposed fix Still building though...
, and have the same error.

Related discussion:
text: qtbase = qt4; }; <del> scfbuild = python2.pkgs.callPackage ../tools/misc/scfbuild { }; </del> <ins> scfbuild = python3.pkgs.callPackage ../tools/misc/scfbuild { }; </ins> scriptaculous = callPackage ../development/libraries/scriptaculous { };
Code change:
Describe the bug Trying to rebuild from git master and it complains about fonttools and python version mismatch. To Reproduce Metadata Please run and paste the result. root nix run -c nix-info -m system: host os: multi-user?: sandbox: version: nixpkgs: channels(root): Maintainer information:
Looks like an issue with trying to build it with Python 2.7.x. The code isn't entirely compatible with Python 3.x nevertheless.
The issue seems to be with nototools which we currently have disabled for python3. The last nototools release is apparently fully compatible with python3. I'm working on a fix for this, however, the build now has a strange relationship with noto-fonts that I haven't quite figured out yet.
In the latest release nototools seems to still fail, or at least does on mine. The only relationship I found is that nototools is a dependency on noto-fonts.
you mean when running , or something similar? That's expected since nototools has been disabled for python3 (python3 support has only recently been upstream). I believe the relationship is actually that nototools is a dep of noto-fonts-emoji. The current nototools seems to require noto-fonts as a dep. I've gotten most of the way to a fix I think (changed nototools version and enabled py3 and what we fetch with the fetchZip in noto-fonts). However, the way that nototools expects noto-fonts is pretty strange (as an example look at the top level makefile where it looks for the noto-fonts repo in nototools' parent directory). I'm having a bit of trouble getting noto-fonts in the form nototools expects. I'm trying not to just copy the entire noto-fonts source into nototools source which seems like it should be unnecessary. Once nototools is fixed for python3 the rest should be easy bc we can just change noto-fonts etc to use python3. If you have any thoughts on how to fix nototools I'd love to hear them, or if you think I'm missing something here pls do let me know.
should be a dependency of the derivation. I'm not sure where you're seeing the fact that needs as a dependency. The farthest I've gotten is removing all the errors from the configuration but the build still fails with .
You mean that it should be a dependency of or it is currently? In regard to "is currently" I don't see it as currently being a dependency. The only place appears in noto- is in the following lines as part of derivation. If you mean it should be, then how you get to build on its own? If you change the nototools version to 0.2.0 which adds python3 support I get errors about missing font directories (these directories come from noto-fonts). What am I missing here?
Proposed fix Still building though...
, and have the same error.

Related discussion:
text: <del> { stdenv, fetchgit, fontforge, pythonFull }: </del> <ins> { stdenv, fetchgit, fontforge, python3 }: </ins> stdenv.mkDerivation rec { pname = "rictydiminished-with-firacode";
Code change:
Describe the bug Trying to rebuild from git master and it complains about fonttools and python version mismatch. To Reproduce Metadata Please run and paste the result. root nix run -c nix-info -m system: host os: multi-user?: sandbox: version: nixpkgs: channels(root): Maintainer information:
Looks like an issue with trying to build it with Python 2.7.x. The code isn't entirely compatible with Python 3.x nevertheless.
The issue seems to be with nototools which we currently have disabled for python3. The last nototools release is apparently fully compatible with python3. I'm working on a fix for this, however, the build now has a strange relationship with noto-fonts that I haven't quite figured out yet.
In the latest release nototools seems to still fail, or at least does on mine. The only relationship I found is that nototools is a dependency on noto-fonts.
you mean when running , or something similar? That's expected since nototools has been disabled for python3 (python3 support has only recently been upstream). I believe the relationship is actually that nototools is a dep of noto-fonts-emoji. The current nototools seems to require noto-fonts as a dep. I've gotten most of the way to a fix I think (changed nototools version and enabled py3 and what we fetch with the fetchZip in noto-fonts). However, the way that nototools expects noto-fonts is pretty strange (as an example look at the top level makefile where it looks for the noto-fonts repo in nototools' parent directory). I'm having a bit of trouble getting noto-fonts in the form nototools expects. I'm trying not to just copy the entire noto-fonts source into nototools source which seems like it should be unnecessary. Once nototools is fixed for python3 the rest should be easy bc we can just change noto-fonts etc to use python3. If you have any thoughts on how to fix nototools I'd love to hear them, or if you think I'm missing something here pls do let me know.
should be a dependency of the derivation. I'm not sure where you're seeing the fact that needs as a dependency. The farthest I've gotten is removing all the errors from the configuration but the build still fails with .
You mean that it should be a dependency of or it is currently? In regard to "is currently" I don't see it as currently being a dependency. The only place appears in noto- is in the following lines as part of derivation. If you mean it should be, then how you get to build on its own? If you change the nototools version to 0.2.0 which adds python3 support I get errors about missing font directories (these directories come from noto-fonts). What am I missing here?
Proposed fix Still building though...
, and have the same error.

Related discussion:
text: nativeBuildInputs = [ fontforge <del> (pythonFull.withPackages (ps: [ </del> <ins> (python3.withPackages (ps: [ </ins> ps.jinja2 ps.py3to2 ps.fonttools
Code change:
Describe the bug Trying to rebuild from git master and it complains about fonttools and python version mismatch. To Reproduce Metadata Please run and paste the result. root nix run -c nix-info -m system: host os: multi-user?: sandbox: version: nixpkgs: channels(root): Maintainer information:
Looks like an issue with trying to build it with Python 2.7.x. The code isn't entirely compatible with Python 3.x nevertheless.
The issue seems to be with nototools which we currently have disabled for python3. The last nototools release is apparently fully compatible with python3. I'm working on a fix for this, however, the build now has a strange relationship with noto-fonts that I haven't quite figured out yet.
In the latest release nototools seems to still fail, or at least does on mine. The only relationship I found is that nototools is a dependency on noto-fonts.
you mean when running , or something similar? That's expected since nototools has been disabled for python3 (python3 support has only recently been upstream). I believe the relationship is actually that nototools is a dep of noto-fonts-emoji. The current nototools seems to require noto-fonts as a dep. I've gotten most of the way to a fix I think (changed nototools version and enabled py3 and what we fetch with the fetchZip in noto-fonts). However, the way that nototools expects noto-fonts is pretty strange (as an example look at the top level makefile where it looks for the noto-fonts repo in nototools' parent directory). I'm having a bit of trouble getting noto-fonts in the form nototools expects. I'm trying not to just copy the entire noto-fonts source into nototools source which seems like it should be unnecessary. Once nototools is fixed for python3 the rest should be easy bc we can just change noto-fonts etc to use python3. If you have any thoughts on how to fix nototools I'd love to hear them, or if you think I'm missing something here pls do let me know.
should be a dependency of the derivation. I'm not sure where you're seeing the fact that needs as a dependency. The farthest I've gotten is removing all the errors from the configuration but the build still fails with .
You mean that it should be a dependency of or it is currently? In regard to "is currently" I don't see it as currently being a dependency. The only place appears in noto- is in the following lines as part of derivation. If you mean it should be, then how you get to build on its own? If you change the nototools version to 0.2.0 which adds python3 support I get errors about missing font directories (these directories come from noto-fonts). What am I missing here?
Proposed fix Still building though...
, and have the same error.

Related discussion:
text: <del> { stdenv, fetchFromGitHub, fontforge, pythonPackages, python }: </del> <ins> { stdenv, fetchFromGitHub, fontforge, python3Packages, python3 }: </ins> stdenv.mkDerivation rec { pname = "liberation-sans-narrow";
Code change:
Describe the bug Trying to rebuild from git master and it complains about fonttools and python version mismatch. To Reproduce Metadata Please run and paste the result. root nix run -c nix-info -m system: host os: multi-user?: sandbox: version: nixpkgs: channels(root): Maintainer information:
Looks like an issue with trying to build it with Python 2.7.x. The code isn't entirely compatible with Python 3.x nevertheless.
The issue seems to be with nototools which we currently have disabled for python3. The last nototools release is apparently fully compatible with python3. I'm working on a fix for this, however, the build now has a strange relationship with noto-fonts that I haven't quite figured out yet.
In the latest release nototools seems to still fail, or at least does on mine. The only relationship I found is that nototools is a dependency on noto-fonts.
you mean when running , or something similar? That's expected since nototools has been disabled for python3 (python3 support has only recently been upstream). I believe the relationship is actually that nototools is a dep of noto-fonts-emoji. The current nototools seems to require noto-fonts as a dep. I've gotten most of the way to a fix I think (changed nototools version and enabled py3 and what we fetch with the fetchZip in noto-fonts). However, the way that nototools expects noto-fonts is pretty strange (as an example look at the top level makefile where it looks for the noto-fonts repo in nototools' parent directory). I'm having a bit of trouble getting noto-fonts in the form nototools expects. I'm trying not to just copy the entire noto-fonts source into nototools source which seems like it should be unnecessary. Once nototools is fixed for python3 the rest should be easy bc we can just change noto-fonts etc to use python3. If you have any thoughts on how to fix nototools I'd love to hear them, or if you think I'm missing something here pls do let me know.
should be a dependency of the derivation. I'm not sure where you're seeing the fact that needs as a dependency. The farthest I've gotten is removing all the errors from the configuration but the build still fails with .
You mean that it should be a dependency of or it is currently? In regard to "is currently" I don't see it as currently being a dependency. The only place appears in noto- is in the following lines as part of derivation. If you mean it should be, then how you get to build on its own? If you change the nototools version to 0.2.0 which adds python3 support I get errors about missing font directories (these directories come from noto-fonts). What am I missing here?
Proposed fix Still building though...
, and have the same error.

Related discussion:
text: sha256 = "1qw554jbdnqkg6pjjl4cqkgsalq3398kzvww2naw30vykcz752bm"; }; <del> buildInputs = [ fontforge pythonPackages.fonttools python ]; </del> <ins> buildInputs = [ fontforge python3Packages.fonttools python3 ]; </ins> installPhase = '' find . -name '*Narrow*.ttf' -exec install -m444 -Dt $out/share/fonts/truetype {} ;
Code change:
Describe the bug Trying to rebuild from git master and it complains about fonttools and python version mismatch. To Reproduce Metadata Please run and paste the result. root nix run -c nix-info -m system: host os: multi-user?: sandbox: version: nixpkgs: channels(root): Maintainer information:
Looks like an issue with trying to build it with Python 2.7.x. The code isn't entirely compatible with Python 3.x nevertheless.
The issue seems to be with nototools which we currently have disabled for python3. The last nototools release is apparently fully compatible with python3. I'm working on a fix for this, however, the build now has a strange relationship with noto-fonts that I haven't quite figured out yet.
In the latest release nototools seems to still fail, or at least does on mine. The only relationship I found is that nototools is a dependency on noto-fonts.
you mean when running , or something similar? That's expected since nototools has been disabled for python3 (python3 support has only recently been upstream). I believe the relationship is actually that nototools is a dep of noto-fonts-emoji. The current nototools seems to require noto-fonts as a dep. I've gotten most of the way to a fix I think (changed nototools version and enabled py3 and what we fetch with the fetchZip in noto-fonts). However, the way that nototools expects noto-fonts is pretty strange (as an example look at the top level makefile where it looks for the noto-fonts repo in nototools' parent directory). I'm having a bit of trouble getting noto-fonts in the form nototools expects. I'm trying not to just copy the entire noto-fonts source into nototools source which seems like it should be unnecessary. Once nototools is fixed for python3 the rest should be easy bc we can just change noto-fonts etc to use python3. If you have any thoughts on how to fix nototools I'd love to hear them, or if you think I'm missing something here pls do let me know.
should be a dependency of the derivation. I'm not sure where you're seeing the fact that needs as a dependency. The farthest I've gotten is removing all the errors from the configuration but the build still fails with .
You mean that it should be a dependency of or it is currently? In regard to "is currently" I don't see it as currently being a dependency. The only place appears in noto- is in the following lines as part of derivation. If you mean it should be, then how you get to build on its own? If you change the nototools version to 0.2.0 which adds python3 support I get errors about missing font directories (these directories come from noto-fonts). What am I missing here?
Proposed fix Still building though...
, and have the same error.

Related discussion:
text: <del> { stdenv, fetchFromGitHub, python2Packages, fontforge }: </del> <ins> { stdenv, fetchFromGitHub, python3Packages}: </ins> stdenv.mkDerivation rec { pname = "xits-math";
Code change:
Describe the bug Trying to rebuild from git master and it complains about fonttools and python version mismatch. To Reproduce Metadata Please run and paste the result. root nix run -c nix-info -m system: host os: multi-user?: sandbox: version: nixpkgs: channels(root): Maintainer information:
Looks like an issue with trying to build it with Python 2.7.x. The code isn't entirely compatible with Python 3.x nevertheless.
The issue seems to be with nototools which we currently have disabled for python3. The last nototools release is apparently fully compatible with python3. I'm working on a fix for this, however, the build now has a strange relationship with noto-fonts that I haven't quite figured out yet.
In the latest release nototools seems to still fail, or at least does on mine. The only relationship I found is that nototools is a dependency on noto-fonts.
you mean when running , or something similar? That's expected since nototools has been disabled for python3 (python3 support has only recently been upstream). I believe the relationship is actually that nototools is a dep of noto-fonts-emoji. The current nototools seems to require noto-fonts as a dep. I've gotten most of the way to a fix I think (changed nototools version and enabled py3 and what we fetch with the fetchZip in noto-fonts). However, the way that nototools expects noto-fonts is pretty strange (as an example look at the top level makefile where it looks for the noto-fonts repo in nototools' parent directory). I'm having a bit of trouble getting noto-fonts in the form nototools expects. I'm trying not to just copy the entire noto-fonts source into nototools source which seems like it should be unnecessary. Once nototools is fixed for python3 the rest should be easy bc we can just change noto-fonts etc to use python3. If you have any thoughts on how to fix nototools I'd love to hear them, or if you think I'm missing something here pls do let me know.
should be a dependency of the derivation. I'm not sure where you're seeing the fact that needs as a dependency. The farthest I've gotten is removing all the errors from the configuration but the build still fails with .
You mean that it should be a dependency of or it is currently? In regard to "is currently" I don't see it as currently being a dependency. The only place appears in noto- is in the following lines as part of derivation. If you mean it should be, then how you get to build on its own? If you change the nototools version to 0.2.0 which adds python3 support I get errors about missing font directories (these directories come from noto-fonts). What am I missing here?
Proposed fix Still building though...
, and have the same error.

Related discussion:
text: sha256 = "043g0gnjc7wn1szvrs0rc1vvrq1qmhqh45b0y2kwrlxsgprpv8ll"; }; <del> nativeBuildInputs = [ fontforge ] ++ (with python2Packages; [ python fonttools ]); </del> <ins> nativeBuildInputs = (with python3Packages; [ python fonttools fontforge ]); </ins> postPatch = '' rm *.otf
Code change:
Describe the bug The stable channel was last updated 5 days before. The blocking issue seems to be the build of nlohmannjson timing out. To Reproduce Steps to reproduce the behavior: to local nixpkgs repo: latest changes: stable channel: : That works, so there is no actual issue with the build. The problem is that a test times out on the CI: Maintainer information:

Related discussion:
text: "-DJSON_MultipleHeaders=ON" ]; <del> doCheck = stdenv.hostPlatform == stdenv.buildPlatform; </del> <ins> # A test cause the build to timeout https://github.com/nlohmann/json/issues/1816 #doCheck = stdenv.hostPlatform == stdenv.buildPlatform; doCheck = false; </ins> postInstall = "rm -rf $out/lib64";
Code change:
p4merge is unable to start due to missing library. results in:
cc
Fixed by backporting

Related discussion:
text: # Media support MEDIA_CAMERA_SUPPORT? y MEDIA_RC_SUPPORT? y <ins> MEDIA_USB_SUPPORT y </ins> ${if kernelPlatform ? kernelExtraConfig then kernelPlatform.kernelExtraConfig else ""} ${extraConfig}
Code change:
Describe the bug The latest macvim fails to install with a build error like below I think this change is the cause: The previous version builds fine. To Reproduce the channel to the latest one. or update macvim: or will see the error back to the previous generation: works fine Expected behavior Should install/update fine. Screenshots N/A Additional context macOS 10.14.6 (18G87) Metadata Please run and paste the result. Maintainer information:
cc:
Huh, it builds on my 10.14.6 machine, I wonder what the difference is. Also looking through the build output right now I see on the link command for MacVim. Did you customize macvim, or just build it as-is?
I guess the link command for the binary doesn't include , just the one for .
I don't have any customizations.
Ok I’ll look into adding the right flag to the Vim link step when I can.
Can you test and let me know if that fixes it?
Will do but I'm quite new to nix and don't know how to apply that change to my local nix env. Any pointers?
Normally I'd suggest using to build it, but that builds with the sandbox and macvim can't build with the full sandbox (it requires the sandbox to be off or in ). Given that, what you can do is just check out the PR branch. If you have a git checkout of nixpkgs this can be done with . Then you can run to build macvim from that checkout. If this succeeds it'll create a symlink in the current directory that contains the build results. You could in theory install this into your environment too if you like, with .
Can do or
worked. Thanks, & !
Thank you for testing. I will merge the fix now.

Related discussion:
text: "--with-tclsh=${tcl}/bin/tclsh" "--with-tlib=ncurses" "--with-compiledby=Nix" <ins> "LDFLAGS=-headerpad_max_install_names" </ins> ]; makeFlags = ''PREFIX=$(out) CPPFLAGS="-Wno-error"'';