Code change:
Found this when trying to see which vendored dependencies does not use a proper tag (and is using a random SHA). The dependency is very old and there have been a lot of updates to it: Looks like the However there does not seem to be anyone around to take care of the portworx plugin. Is it time to deprecate it? is anyone using it? /sig storage
cc ?
/area code-organization
Hello The portworx volume plugin is definitely in use. The portworx volume plugin doesn't need frequent updates since the plugin acts as a simple client to all provisioning calls. In the same view, the vendored openstorage package doesn't need to be updated too. The server side implementation in Portworx handles all the latest Portworx features.
cc:
in that case, can you please update the dependency to a specific tag instead of a random SHA?
/assign updated the title of the issue as well
my request is not for a new release or tag in libopenstorage/openstorage repository. Just to update the SHA we use in our k/k repository to one of the released versions ( ). This is not asking or demanding anything to be done in libopenstorage/openstorage, just that we should update what we use from there (and avoid a random SHA). We are trying to do this for all vendored libraries (one by one … slowly as part of the sig-arch code organization sub project, so it’s not a random request)
/assign
GitHub didn't allow me to assign the following users: lpabon. Note that only , repo collaborators and people who have commented on this issue/PR can be assigned. Additionally, issues/PRs can only have 10 assignees at the same time. For more information please see <detailsIn response to : /assign Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available . If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the repository. </details
After a chat with - apparently this request is coming across the wrong way I am closing this out as it seems to add a over head /close
Closing this issue. <detailsIn response to : After a chat with - apparently this request is coming across the wrong way /close Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available . If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the repository. </details

Related discussion:
text: github.com/kr/text v0.1.0 h1:45sCR5RtlFHMR4UwH9sdQ5TC8v0qDQCHnXt+kaKSTVE= github.com/kr/text v0.1.0/go.mod h1:4Jbv+DJW3UT/LiOwJeYQe1efqtUx/iVham/4vfdArNI= github.com/kylelemons/godebug v0.0.0-20170820004349-d65d576e9348/go.mod h1:B69LEHPfb2qLo0BaaOLcbitczOKLWTsrBG9LczfCD4k= <del> github.com/libopenstorage/openstorage v0.0.0-20170906232338-093a0c388875 h1:s+gZ8/rkYrWgN7xTMUISDw6nspgWyju2OCKmpFBrviQ= github.com/libopenstorage/openstorage v0.0.0-20170906232338-093a0c388875/go.mod h1:Sp1sIObHjat1BeXhfMqLZ14wnOzEhNx2YQedreMcUyc= </del> <ins> github.com/libopenstorage/openstorage v1.0.0 h1:GLPam7/0mpdP8ZZtKjbfcXJBTIA/T1O6CBErVEFEyIM= github.com/libopenstorage/openstorage v1.0.0/go.mod h1:Sp1sIObHjat1BeXhfMqLZ14wnOzEhNx2YQedreMcUyc= </ins> github.com/liggitt/tabwriter v0.0.0-20181228230101-89fcab3d43de h1:9TO3cAIGXtEhnIaL+V+BEER86oLrvS+kWobKpbJuye0= github.com/liggitt/tabwriter v0.0.0-20181228230101-89fcab3d43de/go.mod h1:zAbeS9B/r2mtpb6U+EI2rYA5OAXxsYw6wTamcNW+zcE= github.com/lithammer/dedent v1.1.0 h1:VNzHMVCBNG1j0fh3OrsFRkVUwStdDArbgBWoPAffktY=