jiebi/CodeConvo huggingface dataset:
Code change:
There are some cases when kube-proxy has to exit and restart, in order to do that we panic, but this has the problem that the log output shows a literal "panic" message and engineers, support, customers and automation gets confused, thinking that is a problem when is the expected behavior. As suggested by in , we can replace by /sig network /help /kind cleanup
This request has been marked as needing help from a contributor. Please ensure that the issue body includes answers to the following questions: Why are we solving this issue? To address this issue, are there any code changes? If there are code changes, what needs to be done in the code and what places can the assignee treat as reference points? Does this issue have zero to low barrier of entry? How can the assignee reach out to you for help? For more details on the requirements of such an issue, please see and ensure that they are met. If this request no longer meets these requirements, the label can be removed by commenting with the command. <detailsIn response to : There are some cases when kube-proxy has to exit and restart, in order to do that we panic, but this has the problem that the log output shows a literal "panic" message and engineers, support, customers and automation gets confused, thinking that is a problem when is the expected behavior. /help /kind cleanup </details
This issue is currently awaiting triage. If a SIG or subproject determines this is a relevant issue, they will accept it by applying the label and provide further guidance. The label can be by org members by writing in a comment. <detailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available . If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the repository. </details
/assign I would like to raise a PR to fix this.

Related discussion:
text: if !reflect.DeepEqual(n.podCIDRs, podCIDRs) { klog.ErrorS(nil, "Using NodeCIDR LocalDetector mode, current PodCIDRs are different than previous PodCIDRs, restarting", "node", klog.KObj(node), "newPodCIDRs", podCIDRs, "oldPODCIDRs", n.podCIDRs) <del> panic("Current Node PodCIDRs are different than previous PodCIDRs, restarting") </del> <ins> klog.FlushAndExit(klog.ExitFlushTimeout, 1) </ins> } }
Code change:
There are some cases when kube-proxy has to exit and restart, in order to do that we panic, but this has the problem that the log output shows a literal "panic" message and engineers, support, customers and automation gets confused, thinking that is a problem when is the expected behavior. As suggested by in , we can replace by /sig network /help /kind cleanup
This request has been marked as needing help from a contributor. Please ensure that the issue body includes answers to the following questions: Why are we solving this issue? To address this issue, are there any code changes? If there are code changes, what needs to be done in the code and what places can the assignee treat as reference points? Does this issue have zero to low barrier of entry? How can the assignee reach out to you for help? For more details on the requirements of such an issue, please see and ensure that they are met. If this request no longer meets these requirements, the label can be removed by commenting with the command. <detailsIn response to : There are some cases when kube-proxy has to exit and restart, in order to do that we panic, but this has the problem that the log output shows a literal "panic" message and engineers, support, customers and automation gets confused, thinking that is a problem when is the expected behavior. /help /kind cleanup </details
This issue is currently awaiting triage. If a SIG or subproject determines this is a relevant issue, they will accept it by applying the label and provide further guidance. The label can be by org members by writing in a comment. <detailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available . If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the repository. </details
/assign I would like to raise a PR to fix this.

Related discussion:
text: package proxy import ( <ins> "strconv" </ins> "testing" v1 "k8s.io/api/core/v1" metav1 "k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/apis/meta/v1" <ins> "k8s.io/klog/v2" </ins> ) func TestNodePodCIDRHandlerAdd(t *testing.T) { <ins> oldKlogOsExit := klog.OsExit defer func() { klog.OsExit = oldKlogOsExit }() klog.OsExit = customExit </ins> tests := []struct { name            string oldNodePodCIDRs []string
Code change:
There are some cases when kube-proxy has to exit and restart, in order to do that we panic, but this has the problem that the log output shows a literal "panic" message and engineers, support, customers and automation gets confused, thinking that is a problem when is the expected behavior. As suggested by in , we can replace by /sig network /help /kind cleanup
This request has been marked as needing help from a contributor. Please ensure that the issue body includes answers to the following questions: Why are we solving this issue? To address this issue, are there any code changes? If there are code changes, what needs to be done in the code and what places can the assignee treat as reference points? Does this issue have zero to low barrier of entry? How can the assignee reach out to you for help? For more details on the requirements of such an issue, please see and ensure that they are met. If this request no longer meets these requirements, the label can be removed by commenting with the command. <detailsIn response to : There are some cases when kube-proxy has to exit and restart, in order to do that we panic, but this has the problem that the log output shows a literal "panic" message and engineers, support, customers and automation gets confused, thinking that is a problem when is the expected behavior. /help /kind cleanup </details
This issue is currently awaiting triage. If a SIG or subproject determines this is a relevant issue, they will accept it by applying the label and provide further guidance. The label can be by org members by writing in a comment. <detailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available . If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the repository. </details
/assign I would like to raise a PR to fix this.

Related discussion:
text: t.Errorf("The code did panic") } }() n.OnNodeAdd(node) }) } } func TestNodePodCIDRHandlerUpdate(t *testing.T) { <ins> oldKlogOsExit := klog.OsExit defer func() { klog.OsExit = oldKlogOsExit }() klog.OsExit = customExit </ins> tests := []struct { name            string oldNodePodCIDRs []string
Code change:
There are some cases when kube-proxy has to exit and restart, in order to do that we panic, but this has the problem that the log output shows a literal "panic" message and engineers, support, customers and automation gets confused, thinking that is a problem when is the expected behavior. As suggested by in , we can replace by /sig network /help /kind cleanup
This request has been marked as needing help from a contributor. Please ensure that the issue body includes answers to the following questions: Why are we solving this issue? To address this issue, are there any code changes? If there are code changes, what needs to be done in the code and what places can the assignee treat as reference points? Does this issue have zero to low barrier of entry? How can the assignee reach out to you for help? For more details on the requirements of such an issue, please see and ensure that they are met. If this request no longer meets these requirements, the label can be removed by commenting with the command. <detailsIn response to : There are some cases when kube-proxy has to exit and restart, in order to do that we panic, but this has the problem that the log output shows a literal "panic" message and engineers, support, customers and automation gets confused, thinking that is a problem when is the expected behavior. /help /kind cleanup </details
This issue is currently awaiting triage. If a SIG or subproject determines this is a relevant issue, they will accept it by applying the label and provide further guidance. The label can be by org members by writing in a comment. <detailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available . If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the repository. </details
/assign I would like to raise a PR to fix this.

Related discussion:
text: t.Errorf("The code did panic") } }() n.OnNodeUpdate(oldNode, node) }) } } <ins> func customExit(exitCode int) { panic(strconv.Itoa(exitCode)) } </ins>
Code change:
found this by running tests on this PR: it's problematic for a couple of reasons: prevents kubeadm from moving out (eventually) there are no API guarantees in the given code/structs/functions in pkiutils the logic in cmd/kube- must be reworked to generate cert/key pair without using kubeadm. originally in pending fix PR
/sig api-machinery cluster-lifecycle architecture /area code-organization
The label(s) cannot be applied, because the repository doesn't have them. <detailsIn response to : /sig api-machinery sig-cluster-lifecycle architecture /area code-organization </details
/assign
cc
Please make sure to add an import restriction to prevent a regression in the future.
/triage accepted

Related discussion:
text: <ins> rules: - selectorRegexp: k8s[.]io/kubernetes allowedPrefixes: - k8s.io/kubernetes/cmd/kube-apiserver - k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg - k8s.io/kubernetes/plugin - k8s.io/kubernetes/test/utils - k8s.io/kubernetes/third_party </ins>
Code change:
found this by running tests on this PR: it's problematic for a couple of reasons: prevents kubeadm from moving out (eventually) there are no API guarantees in the given code/structs/functions in pkiutils the logic in cmd/kube- must be reworked to generate cert/key pair without using kubeadm. originally in pending fix PR
/sig api-machinery cluster-lifecycle architecture /area code-organization
The label(s) cannot be applied, because the repository doesn't have them. <detailsIn response to : /sig api-machinery sig-cluster-lifecycle architecture /area code-organization </details
/assign
cc
Please make sure to add an import restriction to prevent a regression in the future.
/triage accepted

Related discussion:
text: import ( "context" <ins> "crypto/ecdsa" "crypto/elliptic" "crypto/rand" </ins> "crypto/rsa" "crypto/x509" <ins> "crypto/x509/pkix" "encoding/pem" </ins> "fmt" <ins> "math" "math/big" </ins> "net" "os" "path/filepath"
Code change:
found this by running tests on this PR: it's problematic for a couple of reasons: prevents kubeadm from moving out (eventually) there are no API guarantees in the given code/structs/functions in pkiutils the logic in cmd/kube- must be reworked to generate cert/key pair without using kubeadm. originally in pending fix PR
/sig api-machinery cluster-lifecycle architecture /area code-organization
The label(s) cannot be applied, because the repository doesn't have them. <detailsIn response to : /sig api-machinery sig-cluster-lifecycle architecture /area code-organization </details
/assign
cc
Please make sure to add an import restriction to prevent a regression in the future.
/triage accepted

Related discussion:
text: restclient "k8s.io/client-go/rest" clientgotransport "k8s.io/client-go/transport" "k8s.io/client-go/util/cert" <ins> "k8s.io/client-go/util/keyutil" </ins> logsapi "k8s.io/component-base/logs/api/v1" "k8s.io/klog/v2" "k8s.io/kube-aggregator/pkg/apiserver"
Code change:
found this by running tests on this PR: it's problematic for a couple of reasons: prevents kubeadm from moving out (eventually) there are no API guarantees in the given code/structs/functions in pkiutils the logic in cmd/kube- must be reworked to generate cert/key pair without using kubeadm. originally in pending fix PR
/sig api-machinery cluster-lifecycle architecture /area code-organization
The label(s) cannot be applied, because the repository doesn't have them. <detailsIn response to : /sig api-machinery sig-cluster-lifecycle architecture /area code-organization </details
/assign
cc
Please make sure to add an import restriction to prevent a regression in the future.
/triage accepted

Related discussion:
text: "k8s.io/kubernetes/cmd/kube-apiserver/app" "k8s.io/kubernetes/cmd/kube-apiserver/app/options" <del> "k8s.io/kubernetes/cmd/kubeadm/app/util/pkiutil" </del> testutil "k8s.io/kubernetes/test/utils" )
Code change:
master-informing: ! 2023-09-07 03:13:59 +0000 UTC No response /sig network
Checking this failure This is running ingress-gce version, logs in failure is It seems the healthceck interval is not updated correctly, by reading the test tagging the people with more expertise in this area /cc
/cc
it seems the test restarts the kube-controller-manager but we landed recently the switch from intree to outtree cloud providers, so this logic now runs in the cloud-controller-manager, can this be the problem, that we have to restart the cloud-controller-manager now instead of the kcm?
/triage accepted This flake started after and kept failing after 09-07.
yeah, the logic that handles the loadbalancer shifted to that cloud controller manager with that PR

Related discussion:
text: "k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/framework" e2edaemonset "k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/framework/daemonset" e2edeployment "k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/framework/deployment" <del> e2ekubesystem "k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/framework/kubesystem" </del> e2enetwork "k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/framework/network" e2enode "k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/framework/node" e2epod "k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/framework/pod"
Code change:
master-informing: ! 2023-09-07 03:13:59 +0000 UTC No response /sig network
Checking this failure This is running ingress-gce version, logs in failure is It seems the healthceck interval is not updated correctly, by reading the test tagging the people with more expertise in this area /cc
/cc
it seems the test restarts the kube-controller-manager but we landed recently the switch from intree to outtree cloud providers, so this logic now runs in the cloud-controller-manager, can this be the problem, that we have to restart the cloud-controller-manager now instead of the kcm?
/triage accepted This flake started after and kept failing after 09-07.
yeah, the logic that handles the loadbalancer shifted to that cloud controller manager with that PR

Related discussion:
text: e2eservice "k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/framework/service" e2eskipper "k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/framework/skipper" "k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/network/common" <del> gcecloud "k8s.io/legacy-cloud-providers/gce" </del> admissionapi "k8s.io/pod-security-admission/api" netutils "k8s.io/utils/net" utilpointer "k8s.io/utils/pointer"
Code change:
With the migration to podutils and adding some presubmits (from periodic jobs) we are seeing some failures in presubmits. The error seems to have issues finding the right node to create.
This issue is currently awaiting triage. If a SIG or subproject determines this is a relevant issue, they will accept it by applying the label and provide further guidance. The label can be by org members by writing in a comment. <detailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available . If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the repository. </details
/sig node /sig testing
any leads on solving this one?
see notes on slack -
/assign
this looks good now!

Related discussion:
text: indexer.Add(resourceQuota) // old service was a load balancer, but updated version is a node port. <del> oldService := &api.Service{ ObjectMeta: api.ObjectMeta{Name: "service", Namespace: "test"}, </del> <ins> existingService := &api.Service{ ObjectMeta: api.ObjectMeta{Name: "service", Namespace: "test", ResourceVersion: "1"}, </ins> Spec:       api.ServiceSpec{Type: api.ServiceTypeLoadBalancer}, } newService := &api.Service{
Code change:
With the migration to podutils and adding some presubmits (from periodic jobs) we are seeing some failures in presubmits. The error seems to have issues finding the right node to create.
This issue is currently awaiting triage. If a SIG or subproject determines this is a relevant issue, they will accept it by applying the label and provide further guidance. The label can be by org members by writing in a comment. <detailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available . If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the repository. </details
/sig node /sig testing
any leads on solving this one?
see notes on slack -
/assign
this looks good now!

Related discussion:
text: Ports: []api.ServicePort{{Port: 1234}}, }, } <del> err := handler.Admit(admission.NewAttributesRecord(newService, oldService, api.Kind("Service").WithVersion("version"), newService.Namespace, newService.Name, api.Resource("services").WithVersion("version"), "", admission.Update, nil)) </del> <ins> err := handler.Admit(admission.NewAttributesRecord(newService, existingService, api.Kind("Service").WithVersion("version"), newService.Namespace, newService.Name, api.Resource("services").WithVersion("version"), "", admission.Update, nil)) </ins> if err != nil { t.Errorf("Unexpected error: %v", err) }
Code change:
With the migration to podutils and adding some presubmits (from periodic jobs) we are seeing some failures in presubmits. The error seems to have issues finding the right node to create.
This issue is currently awaiting triage. If a SIG or subproject determines this is a relevant issue, they will accept it by applying the label and provide further guidance. The label can be by org members by writing in a comment. <detailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available . If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the repository. </details
/sig node /sig testing
any leads on solving this one?
see notes on slack -
/assign
this looks good now!

Related discussion:
text: if prevItem == nil { return nil, admission.NewForbidden(a, fmt.Errorf("unable to get previous usage since prior version of object was not found")) } <del> prevUsage := evaluator.Usage(prevItem) deltaUsage = quota.Subtract(deltaUsage, prevUsage) </del> <ins> // if we can definitively determine that this is not a case of "create on update", // then charge based on the delta.  Otherwise, bill the maximum metadata, err := meta.Accessor(prevItem) if err == nil && len(metadata.GetResourceVersion()) > 0 { prevUsage := evaluator.Usage(prevItem) deltaUsage = quota.Subtract(deltaUsage, prevUsage) } </ins> } if quota.IsZero(deltaUsage) { return quotas, nil
Code change:
Two serial tests from sig-node are keep failing: E2eNode Suite. E2eNode Suite. pls see: [1] [2] <fmt.wrapError | 0x40005e7840: failed to update pod "pod--65da-42b7-a6a5-": Pod "pod--65da-42b7-a6a5-" is invalid: spec: Forbidden: pod updates may not change fields other than ,,, (only additions to existing tolerations), (allow it to be set to 1 if it was previously negative) core.PodSpec{ Volumes: []core.Volume{ { Name: "cm", Name: "secret", VolumeSource: core.VolumeSource{ ... // 3 identical fields AWSElasticBlockStore: nil, GitRepo: nil, Secret: nil, Secret: &core.SecretVolumeSource{SecretName: "secret", DefaultMode: &420}, NFS: nil, ISCSI: nil, ... // 9 identical fields FC: nil, AzureFile: nil, ConfigMap: &core.ConfigMapVolumeSource{ LocalObjectReference: core.LocalObjectReference{Name: "does-not-exist"}, DefaultMode: &420, }, ConfigMap: nil, VsphereVolume: nil, AzureDisk: nil, ... // 7 identical fields }, }, }, InitContainers: {{Name: "init1", Image: "", Command: {"sh", "-c", "sleep 5s"}, TerminationMessagePath: "/dev/termination-log", ...}}, Containers: []core.Container{ { ... // 9 identical fields ResizePolicy: nil, RestartPolicy: nil, VolumeMounts: []core.VolumeMount{ { Name: "cm", Name: "secret", ReadOnly: false, MountPath: "/config", ... // 3 identical fields }, }, VolumeDevices: nil, LivenessProbe: nil, ... // 10 identical fields }, }, EphemeralContainers: nil, RestartPolicy: "Always", ... // 28 identical fields } happened since 18/10/23 run the e2e testcases manually No response <details</details<detailsImpacts all </details<details</details<details</details<details</details<details</details
This issue is currently awaiting triage. If a SIG or subproject determines this is a relevant issue, they will accept it by applying the label and provide further guidance. The label can be by org members by writing in a comment. <detailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available . If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the repository. </details
/assign /cc
cc
failed on x86 as well:
/sig node
/unassign
is merged today. /cc
will take a look at this ASAP /assign
and I are sorry for the issue this caused. We decided to open to fix this issue. I think this test was more complicated than we thought. Sorry for this.

Related discussion:
text: // Verify PodReady is not set (since sandboxcreation is blocked) _, err = getTransitionTimeForPodConditionWithStatus(p, v1.PodReady, false) framework.ExpectNoError(err) <del> ginkgo.By("update pod related volume resource to unblock sandbox creation") e2epod.NewPodClient(f).Update(ctx, p.Name, func(pod *v1.Pod) { pod.Spec.Volumes = []v1.Volume{ { Name: "secret", VolumeSource: v1.VolumeSource{ Secret: &v1.SecretVolumeSource{ SecretName: "secret", }, }, }, } pod.Spec.Containers[0].VolumeMounts = []v1.VolumeMount{ { Name:      "secret", MountPath: "/config", }, } }) // Verify PodReadyToStartContainers is set (since sandboxcreation is unblocked) if checkPodReadyToStart { _, err = getTransitionTimeForPodConditionWithStatus(p, v1.PodReadyToStartContainers, true) framework.ExpectNoError(err) } </del> } }
Code change:
CI always has error when using to replace in function in file . No error occurred Use to replace in function in file . No response <details</details<details</details<details</details<details</details<details</details<details</details
/sig api-machinery /area test
/triage accepted /assign /assign

Related discussion:
text: } func (f *fakeService) WaitForReady(ctx context.Context) error { <del> err := wait.PollWithContext(ctx, 1*time.Second, 200*time.Millisecond, func(ctx context.Context) (done bool, err error) { </del> <ins> err := wait.PollUntilContextTimeout(ctx, 200*time.Millisecond, time.Second, false, func(ctx context.Context) (done bool, err error) { </ins> return f.Port() != nil, nil })