Code change:
<!-- This form is for bug reports and feature requests ONLY! If you're looking for help check and the . If the matter is security related, please disclose it privately via --Is this a BUG REPORT or FEATURE REQUEST?: What happened: When I created a crd e.g.: Then I used . I found that the first time the result will be with an error: And as for the second time it will be normal: And it can be stably reproduced every time I created a new CRD. What you expected to happen: kubectl returns the first time I requested the new CRD instead of an error. Anything else we need to know?: I also found that requesting short name e.g. will be the same. It returns an error the first time but becomes normal the second time. Environment: Kubernetes version (use ): Cloud provider or hardware configuration: OS (e.g. from /etc/os-release): Kernel (e.g. ): Install tools: Others: /kind bug
/area custom-resources
Confirmed that could show up even the crd has status /assign
/sig api-machinery Haven't looked into the problem yet but could be related:
Looks like this happens because cache file in .kube/http-cache/ or .kube/cache/ is not synced with kube-apiserver. delete all files under .kube/http-cache/ and .kube/cache/ will cause a sync and the error will not show up. This looks like a cli issue.
fyi
Tried to fix in cli:
/cc
/assign
this seems similar to
Even though this bug looks small, it might involve larger changes both in fixing and refactoring.. A typical corner case it is /shrug
Can you put this into words? What's the actual issue?
Even though this bug looks small, it might involve larger changes both in fixing and refactoring.. A typical corner case it is Can you put this into words? What's the actual issue? SRY, I should have put it clearer.. I just mean that this issue is sort of fundamental and obviously has been existing for a long time.
/remove-shrug
/unshrug looks like an important problem we want to solve (?)
¯()/¯ <detailsIn response to : /unshrug Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available . If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the repository. </details
Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity. Mark the issue as fresh with . Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close. If this issue is safe to close now please do so with . Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or . /lifecycle stale
/remove-lifecycle stale
Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity. Mark the issue as fresh with . Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close. If this issue is safe to close now please do so with . Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or . /lifecycle stale
Stale issues rot after 30d of inactivity. Mark the issue as fresh with . Rotten issues close after an additional 30d of inactivity. If this issue is safe to close now please do so with . Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or . /lifecycle rotten
Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity. Reopen the issue with . Mark the issue as fresh with . Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or . /close
Closing this issue. <detailsIn response to : Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity. Reopen the issue with . Mark the issue as fresh with . /close Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available . If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the repository. </details
/reopen /remove-lifecycle rotten ouch..
Reopened this issue. <detailsIn response to : /reopen /remove-lifecycle rotten Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available . If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the repository. </details
/cc
encountered same issue, as suggested the error will not show up.
any progress?
Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity. Mark the issue as fresh with . Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close. If this issue is safe to close now please do so with . Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or . /lifecycle stale
Stale issues rot after 30d of inactivity. Mark the issue as fresh with . Rotten issues close after an additional 30d of inactivity. If this issue is safe to close now please do so with . Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or . /lifecycle rotten
Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity. Reopen the issue with . Mark the issue as fresh with . Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or . /close
Closing this issue. <detailsIn response to : Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity. Reopen the issue with . Mark the issue as fresh with . /close Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available . If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the repository. </details
Here is a little more info, and here is how I am able to reproduce it (kubectl version 1.18.0 and cluster version 1.19.0-beta.2): A couple interesting things i noted... If I deleted my and re-ran it, I could not reproduce it. It is only the first time the short name was EVER used that this occurs. I only tried from one client machine, so I'm not sure this is cluster-specific or client-specific. If I used a different short name, like 'fo2' and re-ran the example, then it reproduces the problem. You can also run after creating the CRD and it has the same effect as deleting your . EDIT TO ADD: This doesn't seem to be a timing thing... if I sleep for 10 seconds after creating the CRD, it still has the problem.
The root of the problem is that the is run before the discovery. So in this particular case this line continues to b/c read cached data and never reached out to server. Whereas discovery mapper in will get a not found error and will proceed invalidating cache and re-fetching discovery data and return that back. In the subsequent call the shortcut expander is already aware of the new shortcut so it works just fine. We'd need to teach shortcut expander to re-fetch discovery data, but I'm not sure that's desirable, or we could at least warn a user about this situation.
See for possible approach.
Any new progress on this ?
lists a candidate solution. This bug is causing steadily failing tests. I'll talk to a few people to see if this can get any traction. do you know who can get this moving? It sounds like you have identified the problem and have proposed a solution.

Related discussion:
text: func (c *fakeDiscoveryClient) OpenAPIV3() openapi.Client { panic("implement me") } <ins> type fakeCachedDiscoveryClient struct { discovery.DiscoveryInterface freshHandler      func() bool invalidateHandler func() } var _ discovery.CachedDiscoveryInterface = &fakeCachedDiscoveryClient{} func (c *fakeCachedDiscoveryClient) Fresh() bool { if c.freshHandler != nil { return c.freshHandler() } return true } func (c *fakeCachedDiscoveryClient) Invalidate() { if c.invalidateHandler != nil { c.invalidateHandler() } } </ins>