Code change:
https://k8s- Failed: [] DNS horizontal autoscaling kube-dns-autoscaler should scale kube-dns pods in both nonfaulty and faulty scenarios {Kubernetes e2e suite}
https://k8s- Failed: [] DNS horizontal autoscaling kube-dns-autoscaler should scale kube-dns pods in both nonfaulty and faulty scenarios {Kubernetes e2e suite}
https://k8s- Failed: [] DNS horizontal autoscaling kube-dns-autoscaler should scale kube-dns pods in both nonfaulty and faulty scenarios {Kubernetes e2e suite}
https://k8s- Failed: [] DNS horizontal autoscaling kube-dns-autoscaler should scale kube-dns pods in both nonfaulty and faulty scenarios {Kubernetes e2e suite}
https://k8s- Failed: [] DNS horizontal autoscaling kube-dns-autoscaler should scale kube-dns pods in both nonfaulty and faulty scenarios {Kubernetes e2e suite}
https://k8s- Failed: [] DNS horizontal autoscaling kube-dns-autoscaler should scale kube-dns pods in both nonfaulty and faulty scenarios {Kubernetes e2e suite}
https://k8s- Failed: [] DNS horizontal autoscaling kube-dns-autoscaler should scale kube-dns pods in both nonfaulty and faulty scenarios {Kubernetes e2e suite}
https://k8s- Failed: [] DNS horizontal autoscaling kube-dns-autoscaler should scale kube-dns pods in both nonfaulty and faulty scenarios {Kubernetes e2e suite}
https://k8s- Failed: [] DNS horizontal autoscaling kube-dns-autoscaler should scale kube-dns pods in both nonfaulty and faulty scenarios {Kubernetes e2e suite}
https://k8s- Failed: [] DNS horizontal autoscaling kube-dns-autoscaler should scale kube-dns pods in both nonfaulty and faulty scenarios {Kubernetes e2e suite}
https://k8s- Failed: [] DNS horizontal autoscaling kube-dns-autoscaler should scale kube-dns pods in both nonfaulty and faulty scenarios {Kubernetes e2e suite}
https://k8s- Failed: [] DNS horizontal autoscaling kube-dns-autoscaler should scale kube-dns pods in both nonfaulty and faulty scenarios {Kubernetes e2e suite}
https://k8s- Failed: [] DNS horizontal autoscaling kube-dns-autoscaler should scale kube-dns pods in both nonfaulty and faulty scenarios {Kubernetes e2e suite}
[FLAKE-PING] This flaky-test issue would love to have more attention.
https://k8s- Failed: [] DNS horizontal autoscaling kube-dns-autoscaler should scale kube-dns pods in both nonfaulty and faulty scenarios {Kubernetes e2e suite}
should this issue be moved into the 1.5 milestone and is it a release blocker? The test seems to flake fairly infrequently but we need to get the issue triaged as to whether it's a 1.5 release blocker. Please update this issue by 1PM PST 30 November 2016. Thanks! cc:
Since the feature it is testing is introduced for 1.5, so it should have the 1.5 milestone? This test is flaking because it is not well written, hence I don't think it is a release blocker. And I already sent out a which got LGTM before but recently rebased.
https://k8s- Failed: [] DNS horizontal autoscaling kube-dns-autoscaler should scale kube-dns pods in both nonfaulty and faulty scenarios {Kubernetes e2e suite}
Thanks for triaging
https://k8s- Failed: [] DNS horizontal autoscaling kube-dns-autoscaler should scale kube-dns pods in both nonfaulty and faulty scenarios {Kubernetes e2e suite}
https://k8s- Failed: [] DNS horizontal autoscaling kube-dns-autoscaler should scale kube-dns pods in both nonfaulty and faulty scenarios {Kubernetes e2e suite}
https://k8s- Failed: [] DNS horizontal autoscaling kube-dns-autoscaler should scale kube-dns pods in both nonfaulty and faulty scenarios {Kubernetes e2e suite}

Related discussion:
text: sum := 0 for _, mig := range strings.Split(framework.TestContext.CloudConfig.NodeInstanceGroup, ",") { size, err := GroupSize(mig) <del> ExpectNoError(err) </del> <ins> Expect(err).NotTo(HaveOccurred()) </ins> By(fmt.Sprintf("Initial size of %s: %d", mig, size)) originalSizes[mig] = size sum += size } <del> Expect(nodeCount).Should(Equal(sum)) </del> By("Manually increase cluster size") increasedSize := 0