Code change:
It is unclear why the test needs the dynamic kubelet config. Need to clean it up. /sig node /priority important-soon /help Test is not a part of any testgrid. Need to understand why and return it back to the grid. Also it is marked as flaky. Need to be deflaked. unknown No response No response No response_ /sig node
This request has been marked as needing help from a contributor. Please ensure that the issue body includes answers to the following questions: Why are we solving this issue? To address this issue, are there any code changes? If there are code changes, what needs to be done in the code and what places can the assignee treat as reference points? Does this issue have zero to low barrier of entry? How can the assignee reach out to you for help? For more details on the requirements of such an issue, please see and ensure that they are met. If this request no longer meets these requirements, the label can be removed by commenting with the command. <detailsIn response to : ### Which jobs are failing? /priority important-soon /help ### Which tests are failing? Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available . If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the repository. </details
This issue is currently awaiting triage. If a SIG or subproject determines this is a relevant issue, they will accept it by applying the label and provide further guidance. The label can be by org members by writing in a comment. <detailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available . If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the repository. </details
Hi, I am new to this project and would really love to start contributing and thought this might be a good start. Could you tell me a little more about this problem?
glad to have you, welcome! Some step by step you may start with: Find the test mentioned, understand what it is doing If dependency on DynamicKubeletConfig is found, try to work around them and remove that line. Try running the test locally. If you can repro flakiness - try to fix it If test passes: Try removing the and see if passes in serial tests on presubmits
Thank you so much! /assign
/cc
it had a non-op config change in the past - - I potentially missed this when removing that
so, if I'd like to fix it, what should I do?
see Since we understood item 2 - it is not needed, just remove the skipper lines. Ideally test needs to be de-flaked as well, but it it not necessarily in the scope of this change
this is a simple issue, so I tried to fix it since I've found it some days.

Related discussion:
text: f := framework.NewDefaultFramework("critical-pod-test") ginkgo.Context("when we need to admit a critical pod", func() { ginkgo.It("[Flaky] should be able to create and delete a critical pod", func() { <del> configEnabled, err := isKubeletConfigEnabled(f) framework.ExpectNoError(err) if !configEnabled { e2eskipper.Skipf("unable to run test without dynamic kubelet config enabled.") } </del> // because adminssion Priority enable, If the priority class is not found, the Pod is rejected. node := getNodeName(f) // Define test pods