Code change:
This test is failing in both gce serial suite: http://k8s- /sig network /priority failing-test /priority critical-urgent /kind bug /status approved-for-milestone cc /assign PTAL
xref
/milestone v1.10
this also fails in http://k8s-
Failing to connect to Services at all. I can't even ping pod IPs:
So I can ping pods same-node and cross-node right up until it kills the apiserver. Rebooting fixes a given node. The apiserver demonstrably comes back - I can query it for info...
- I could use help - have to shift attention soon.
FWIW, I am testing on a Calico-enabled node
I'll take a look at this as well.
Weird, now even after a reboot, this condition is sticky. I have a cluster in this state, if you want to poke.
ugh, now it is resolved.
I just repro'ed without the e2e - have a cluster, proved ping works, killed apiserver ping fails.
Interesting - docker shows the pods not running, but apiserver says they are alive.
Update: docker sees no running pods. API server thinks kubelet is running them. kubelet is getting "" from apiserver, even after kubelet restart.
Update and recap: Bring up a cluster Run some pods Prove that pods are running and services work pkill -9 apiserver Wait. Watch kubelets "lose" pods that were assigned to them Observe that pods are not running and services do not work Observe that apiserver says the pods are running pkill -9 kubelet Observe that it is still broken kubectl delete one pod Observe that kubelet is fixed for that one pod, but not others Q: Why is kubelet not getting a full listing when it restarts?
What exactly does it mean for it to be fixed for a deleted pod?
Kubelet started running the pod that was deleted - it got the update for that one.
The cluster I was testing was a week or 2 old. I built a cluster from HEAD and I can not repro - said the same. Is this test running against head of master?
I also ran the test manually against my new cluster and it passed
FWIW I was also unable to reproduce this yesterday on a cluster from HEAD.
Did some investigations and had some findings for this specific failure: Traced down a bit on the history, the first occurrence was https://k8s- From the , seems suspicious because it modified . Also found reported a relevant symptom: The fix () for that was merged a day ago and may explained why we can't repro from HEAD anymore.
nice, is this issue reproducible without the fix ()?
Sorry should have had confirmed this, bringing up a cluster now.
Quick update: I was able to repro the same failure () from HEAD with reverted. Though this test is now flaky on some other errors: https://k8s- https://k8s- They all seem to failed while communicating with apiserver.
Thanks ! So fixed the issue and I am curious about what introduced the issue. Do you happen to know when did this test start to fail? Just trying to find out what went wrong in between. We have some other possibly related issues so finding out the root cause of this one would be super helpful.
/assign
The first occurrence (for that exact failure) I noticed was https://k8s-, which happened on 2018-02-15 09:49 PST.
You all rock! I see a couple greens on it now, but still mostly red?
The test is now flaky mostly on creating an exec pod after restarting apiserver. Some sample failures: To elaborate a bit more, a snippet of the test procedure is: ssh to master and (sending a SIGTERM) Keep polling on /healthz on apiserver until 200 is returned. Create an exec pod for later steps (and failed on various erros --- EOF, connection refused, apiserver terminating). According to above test failures, my suspicion is that the test is assuming the apiserver is restarted too soon. It is possible that apiserver captured SIGTERM and did a graceful termination, so that polling on /healthz may succeed even in the termination phase. I'm not surprised trying to create a pod via a terminating apiserver will hit those errors. Could anyone confirme the SIGTERM theory?
Spoke with folks, sounds like after SIGTERM apiserver does wait a bit for remaining requests to finish. I will take a stab to refine the test. cc
Sent .
Test is now passing on gce but failing on gke. Apparently we don't have a way to trigger apiserver restart on gke at this moment. Sending a PR to skip this test on gke.
[MILESTONENOTIFIER] Milestone Issue Needs Attention Action required: During code freeze, issues in the milestone should be in progress. If this issue is not being actively worked on, please remove it from the milestone. If it is being worked on, please add the label so it can be tracked with other in-flight issues. Note: This issue is marked as , and must be updated every 1 day during code freeze. Example update: <details<summaryIssue Labels</summary- : Issue will be escalated to these SIGs if needed. : Never automatically move issue out of a release milestone; continually escalate to contributor and SIG through all available channels. : Fixes a bug discovered during the current release. </details<details<summaryHelp</summary<ul<li<a href=""Additional instructions</a</li<li<a href=""Commands for setting labels</a</li</ul</details
Commented too quick. On gke we do a same-version master upgrade. Will send another fix :/

Related discussion:
text: framework.ExpectNoError(framework.VerifyServeHostnameServiceUp(cs, ns, host, podNames1, svc1IP, servicePort)) // Restart apiserver <del> initialRestartCount, err := framework.GetApiserverRestartCount(cs) Expect(err).NotTo(HaveOccurred(), "failed to get apiserver's restart count") </del> By("Restarting apiserver") <del> if err := framework.RestartApiserver(cs.Discovery()); err != nil { </del> <ins> if err := framework.RestartApiserver(cs); err != nil { </ins> framework.Failf("error restarting apiserver: %v", err) } <del> By("Waiting for apiserver to be restarted") if err := framework.WaitForApiserverRestarted(cs, initialRestartCount); err != nil { framework.Failf("error while waiting for apiserver to be restarted: %v", err) } </del> By("Waiting for apiserver to come up by polling /healthz") if err := framework.WaitForApiserverUp(cs); err != nil { framework.Failf("error while waiting for apiserver up: %v", err)