jiebi/CodeConvo huggingface dataset:
Code change:
transformation expandless | 14m1s Failed; === RUN TestEncryptionConfigHotReload TestEncryptionConfigHotReload When I see this flake, 10-09 is the first one.(But the job history in the testgrid only started from 10-03) some PR that may be related: /sig auth /cc
/cc
/triage accepted
/cc failed two times in recent 3 runs:
/reopen as of this is still .
Reopened this issue. <detailsIn response to : /reopen Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available . If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the repository. </details

Related discussion:
text: } } <del> func verifyIfKMSTransformersSwapped(t *testing.T, wantPrefix, wantPrefixForEncryptAll string, test *transformTest) { </del> <ins> func verifyIfKMSTransformersSwapped(t *testing.T, wantPrefix string, test *transformTest) { </ins> t.Helper() var swapErr error
Code change:
transformation expandless | 14m1s Failed; === RUN TestEncryptionConfigHotReload TestEncryptionConfigHotReload When I see this flake, 10-09 is the first one.(But the job history in the testgrid only started from 10-03) some PR that may be related: /sig auth /cc
/cc
/triage accepted
/cc failed two times in recent 3 runs:
/reopen as of this is still .
Reopened this issue. <detailsIn response to : /reopen Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available . If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the repository. </details

Related discussion:
text: return false, nil } <del> if wantPrefixForEncryptAll != "" { deploymentName := fmt.Sprintf("deployment-%d", idx) _, err := test.createDeployment(deploymentName, "default") if err != nil { t.Fatalf("Failed to create test secret, error: %v", err) } rawEnvelope, err := test.readRawRecordFromETCD(test.getETCDPathForResource(test.storageConfig.Prefix, "", "deployments", deploymentName, "default")) if err != nil { t.Fatalf("failed to read %s from etcd: %v", test.getETCDPathForResource(test.storageConfig.Prefix, "", "deployments", deploymentName, "default"), err) } // check prefix if !bytes.HasPrefix(rawEnvelope.Kvs[0].Value, []byte(wantPrefixForEncryptAll)) { idx++ swapErr = fmt.Errorf("expected deployment to be prefixed with %s, but got %s", wantPrefixForEncryptAll, rawEnvelope.Kvs[0].Value) // return nil error to continue polling till timeout return false, nil } } </del> return true, nil }) if pollErr == wait.ErrWaitTimeout {
Code change:
transformation expandless | 14m1s Failed; === RUN TestEncryptionConfigHotReload TestEncryptionConfigHotReload When I see this flake, 10-09 is the first one.(But the job history in the testgrid only started from 10-03) some PR that may be related: /sig auth /cc
/cc
/triage accepted
/cc failed two times in recent 3 runs:
/reopen as of this is still .
Reopened this issue. <detailsIn response to : /reopen Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available . If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the repository. </details

Related discussion:
text: } } <ins> func updateFile(t *testing.T, configDir, filename string, newContent []byte) { t.Helper() // Create a temporary file tempFile, err := os.CreateTemp(configDir, "tempfile") if err != nil { t.Fatal(err) } defer tempFile.Close() // Write the new content to the temporary file _, err = tempFile.Write(newContent) if err != nil { t.Fatal(err) } // Atomically replace the original file with the temporary file err = os.Rename(tempFile.Name(), filepath.Join(configDir, filename)) if err != nil { t.Fatal(err) } } </ins> func TestKMSHealthz(t *testing.T) { encryptionConfig := ` kind: EncryptionConfiguration
Code change:
4 other Test Failures in ci-crio-cgroupv1-node-e2e-features. Test has failed 61 times (no passing result found). Earliest failure found at commit/ (Thu Oct 19 21:41 PDT). /cc { failed [FAILED] Error creating Pod: pods "pod-dualstack-host-ips9ddb9810-134c-4d35-a0c6-" is forbidden: violates PodSecurity "restricted:latest": host namespaces (hostNetwork=true) In [It] at: @ 10/23/23 01:38:06.024 } No response_ /sig network node
This issue is currently awaiting triage. If a SIG or subproject determines this is a relevant issue, they will accept it by applying the label and provide further guidance. The label can be by org members by writing in a comment. <detailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available . If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the repository. </details
/assign
is also failing on these tests
the test has a bug, it checks the contrary
, let's start over, 1 commit for the e2e test, other for the promotion, and let's validate everything is alright before merging

Related discussion:
text: "k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/util/uuid" netutils "k8s.io/utils/net" <ins> utilfeature "k8s.io/apiserver/pkg/util/feature" </ins> kubefeatures "k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/features" kubeletconfig "k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/kubelet/apis/config" "k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/framework"
Code change:
4 other Test Failures in ci-crio-cgroupv1-node-e2e-features. Test has failed 61 times (no passing result found). Earliest failure found at commit/ (Thu Oct 19 21:41 PDT). /cc { failed [FAILED] Error creating Pod: pods "pod-dualstack-host-ips9ddb9810-134c-4d35-a0c6-" is forbidden: violates PodSecurity "restricted:latest": host namespaces (hostNetwork=true) In [It] at: @ 10/23/23 01:38:06.024 } No response_ /sig network node
This issue is currently awaiting triage. If a SIG or subproject determines this is a relevant issue, they will accept it by applying the label and provide further guidance. The label can be by org members by writing in a comment. <detailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available . If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the repository. </details
/assign
is also failing on these tests
the test has a bug, it checks the contrary
, let's start over, 1 commit for the e2e test, other for the promotion, and let's validate everything is alright before merging

Related discussion:
text: e2enode "k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/framework/node" e2epod "k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/framework/pod" e2epodoutput "k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/framework/pod/output" <ins> e2eskipper "k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/framework/skipper" </ins> "k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/network/common" imageutils "k8s.io/kubernetes/test/utils/image" <ins> admissionapi "k8s.io/pod-security-admission/api" </ins> ) <del> var _ = common.SIGDescribe("Dual Stack Host IP [Feature:PodHostIPs]", func() { </del> <ins> var _ = common.SIGDescribe("DualStack Host IP [Serial] [NodeFeature:PodHostIPs] [Feature:PodHostIPs]", func() { </ins> f := framework.NewDefaultFramework("dualstack") <ins> f.NamespacePodSecurityLevel = admissionapi.LevelPrivileged </ins> ginkgo.Context("when creating a Pod, it has no PodHostIPs feature", func() { tempSetCurrentKubeletConfig(f, func(ctx context.Context, initialConfig *kubeletconfig.KubeletConfiguration) {
Code change:
4 other Test Failures in ci-crio-cgroupv1-node-e2e-features. Test has failed 61 times (no passing result found). Earliest failure found at commit/ (Thu Oct 19 21:41 PDT). /cc { failed [FAILED] Error creating Pod: pods "pod-dualstack-host-ips9ddb9810-134c-4d35-a0c6-" is forbidden: violates PodSecurity "restricted:latest": host namespaces (hostNetwork=true) In [It] at: @ 10/23/23 01:38:06.024 } No response_ /sig network node
This issue is currently awaiting triage. If a SIG or subproject determines this is a relevant issue, they will accept it by applying the label and provide further guidance. The label can be by org members by writing in a comment. <detailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available . If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the repository. </details
/assign
is also failing on these tests
the test has a bug, it checks the contrary
, let's start over, 1 commit for the e2e test, other for the promotion, and let's validate everything is alright before merging

Related discussion:
text: gomega.Expect(p.Status.HostIPs).Should(gomega.BeNil()) ginkgo.By("deleting the pod") <del> err := podClient.Delete(ctx, pod.Name, *metav1.NewDeleteOptions(30)) </del> <ins> err := podClient.Delete(ctx, pod.Name, *metav1.NewDeleteOptions(1)) </ins> framework.ExpectNoError(err, "failed to delete pod") })
Code change:
4 other Test Failures in ci-crio-cgroupv1-node-e2e-features. Test has failed 61 times (no passing result found). Earliest failure found at commit/ (Thu Oct 19 21:41 PDT). /cc { failed [FAILED] Error creating Pod: pods "pod-dualstack-host-ips9ddb9810-134c-4d35-a0c6-" is forbidden: violates PodSecurity "restricted:latest": host namespaces (hostNetwork=true) In [It] at: @ 10/23/23 01:38:06.024 } No response_ /sig network node
This issue is currently awaiting triage. If a SIG or subproject determines this is a relevant issue, they will accept it by applying the label and provide further guidance. The label can be by org members by writing in a comment. <detailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available . If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the repository. </details
/assign
is also failing on these tests
the test has a bug, it checks the contrary
, let's start over, 1 commit for the e2e test, other for the promotion, and let's validate everything is alright before merging

Related discussion:
text: gomega.Expect(p.Status.HostIPs).Should(gomega.BeNil()) ginkgo.By("deleting the pod") <del> err := podClient.Delete(ctx, pod.Name, *metav1.NewDeleteOptions(30)) </del> <ins> err := podClient.Delete(ctx, pod.Name, *metav1.NewDeleteOptions(1)) </ins> framework.ExpectNoError(err, "failed to delete pod") }) })
Code change:
4 other Test Failures in ci-crio-cgroupv1-node-e2e-features. Test has failed 61 times (no passing result found). Earliest failure found at commit/ (Thu Oct 19 21:41 PDT). /cc { failed [FAILED] Error creating Pod: pods "pod-dualstack-host-ips9ddb9810-134c-4d35-a0c6-" is forbidden: violates PodSecurity "restricted:latest": host namespaces (hostNetwork=true) In [It] at: @ 10/23/23 01:38:06.024 } No response_ /sig network node
This issue is currently awaiting triage. If a SIG or subproject determines this is a relevant issue, they will accept it by applying the label and provide further guidance. The label can be by org members by writing in a comment. <detailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available . If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the repository. </details
/assign
is also failing on these tests
the test has a bug, it checks the contrary
, let's start over, 1 commit for the e2e test, other for the promotion, and let's validate everything is alright before merging

Related discussion:
text: podName := "pod-dualstack-host-ips" <del> pod := &v1.Pod{ ObjectMeta: metav1.ObjectMeta{ Name:   podName, Labels: map[string]string{"test": "dualstack-host-ips"}, }, Spec: v1.PodSpec{ Containers: []v1.Container{ { Name:  "dualstack-host-ips", Image: imageutils.GetE2EImage(imageutils.Agnhost), }, }, }, } </del> <ins> pod := genPodHostIPs(podName+string(uuid.NewUUID()), false) </ins> ginkgo.By("submitting the pod to kubernetes") podClient := e2epod.NewPodClient(f)
Code change:
4 other Test Failures in ci-crio-cgroupv1-node-e2e-features. Test has failed 61 times (no passing result found). Earliest failure found at commit/ (Thu Oct 19 21:41 PDT). /cc { failed [FAILED] Error creating Pod: pods "pod-dualstack-host-ips9ddb9810-134c-4d35-a0c6-" is forbidden: violates PodSecurity "restricted:latest": host namespaces (hostNetwork=true) In [It] at: @ 10/23/23 01:38:06.024 } No response_ /sig network node
This issue is currently awaiting triage. If a SIG or subproject determines this is a relevant issue, they will accept it by applying the label and provide further guidance. The label can be by org members by writing in a comment. <detailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available . If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the repository. </details
/assign
is also failing on these tests
the test has a bug, it checks the contrary
, let's start over, 1 commit for the e2e test, other for the promotion, and let's validate everything is alright before merging

Related discussion:
text: } ginkgo.By("deleting the pod") <del> err = podClient.Delete(ctx, pod.Name, *metav1.NewDeleteOptions(30)) </del> <ins> err = podClient.Delete(ctx, pod.Name, *metav1.NewDeleteOptions(1)) </ins> framework.ExpectNoError(err, "failed to delete pod") })
Code change:
4 other Test Failures in ci-crio-cgroupv1-node-e2e-features. Test has failed 61 times (no passing result found). Earliest failure found at commit/ (Thu Oct 19 21:41 PDT). /cc { failed [FAILED] Error creating Pod: pods "pod-dualstack-host-ips9ddb9810-134c-4d35-a0c6-" is forbidden: violates PodSecurity "restricted:latest": host namespaces (hostNetwork=true) In [It] at: @ 10/23/23 01:38:06.024 } No response_ /sig network node
This issue is currently awaiting triage. If a SIG or subproject determines this is a relevant issue, they will accept it by applying the label and provide further guidance. The label can be by org members by writing in a comment. <detailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available . If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the repository. </details
/assign
is also failing on these tests
the test has a bug, it checks the contrary
, let's start over, 1 commit for the e2e test, other for the promotion, and let's validate everything is alright before merging

Related discussion:
text: podName := "pod-dualstack-host-ips" <del> pod := &v1.Pod{ ObjectMeta: metav1.ObjectMeta{ Name:   podName, Labels: map[string]string{"test": "dualstack-host-ips"}, }, Spec: v1.PodSpec{ Containers: []v1.Container{ { Name:  "dualstack-host-ips", Image: imageutils.GetE2EImage(imageutils.Agnhost), }, }, HostNetwork: true, }, } </del> <ins> pod := genPodHostIPs(podName+string(uuid.NewUUID()), true) </ins> ginkgo.By("submitting the pod to kubernetes") podClient := e2epod.NewPodClient(f)
Code change:
4 other Test Failures in ci-crio-cgroupv1-node-e2e-features. Test has failed 61 times (no passing result found). Earliest failure found at commit/ (Thu Oct 19 21:41 PDT). /cc { failed [FAILED] Error creating Pod: pods "pod-dualstack-host-ips9ddb9810-134c-4d35-a0c6-" is forbidden: violates PodSecurity "restricted:latest": host namespaces (hostNetwork=true) In [It] at: @ 10/23/23 01:38:06.024 } No response_ /sig network node
This issue is currently awaiting triage. If a SIG or subproject determines this is a relevant issue, they will accept it by applying the label and provide further guidance. The label can be by org members by writing in a comment. <detailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available . If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the repository. </details
/assign
is also failing on these tests
the test has a bug, it checks the contrary
, let's start over, 1 commit for the e2e test, other for the promotion, and let's validate everything is alright before merging

Related discussion:
text: } ginkgo.By("deleting the pod") <del> err = podClient.Delete(ctx, pod.Name, *metav1.NewDeleteOptions(30)) </del> <ins> err = podClient.Delete(ctx, pod.Name, *metav1.NewDeleteOptions(1)) </ins> framework.ExpectNoError(err, "failed to delete pod") }) ginkgo.It("should provide hostIPs as an env var", func(ctx context.Context) { <ins> if !utilfeature.DefaultFeatureGate.Enabled(kubefeatures.PodHostIPs) { e2eskipper.Skipf("PodHostIPs feature is not enabled") } </ins> podName := "downward-api-" + string(uuid.NewUUID()) env := []v1.EnvVar{ {
Code change:
we just log that the user should install etcd, which is impractical in an ephemeral container we actually already call installing etcd in the verify script, but we don't export it into the current PATH for the process so it doesn't work ... ref: /sig api-machinery /assign /kind bug
/triage accepted
for one possible fix
/sig etcd

Related discussion:
text: } kube::etcd::install() { <del> ( local os local arch os=$(kube::util::host_os) arch=$(kube::util::host_arch) cd "${KUBE_ROOT}/third_party" || return 1 if [[ $(readlink etcd) == etcd-v${ETCD_VERSION}-${os}-* ]]; then kube::log::info "etcd v${ETCD_VERSION} already installed. To use:" kube::log::info "export PATH="$(pwd)/etcd:${PATH}"" return  #already installed fi if [[ ${os} == "darwin" ]]; then download_file="etcd-v${ETCD_VERSION}-${os}-${arch}.zip" url="https://github.com/etcd-io/etcd/releases/download/v${ETCD_VERSION}/${download_file}" kube::util::download_file "${url}" "${download_file}" unzip -o "${download_file}" ln -fns "etcd-v${ETCD_VERSION}-${os}-${arch}" etcd rm "${download_file}" elif [[ ${os} == "linux" ]]; then url="https://github.com/coreos/etcd/releases/download/v${ETCD_VERSION}/etcd-v${ETCD_VERSION}-${os}-${arch}.tar.gz" download_file="etcd-v${ETCD_VERSION}-${os}-${arch}.tar.gz" kube::util::download_file "${url}" "${download_file}" tar xzf "${download_file}" ln -fns "etcd-v${ETCD_VERSION}-${os}-${arch}" etcd rm "${download_file}" else kube::log::info "${os} is NOT supported." fi kube::log::info "etcd v${ETCD_VERSION} installed. To use:" </del> <ins> local os local arch os=$(kube::util::host_os) arch=$(kube::util::host_arch) cd "${KUBE_ROOT}/third_party" || return 1 if [[ $(readlink etcd) == etcd-v${ETCD_VERSION}-${os}-* ]]; then kube::log::info "etcd v${ETCD_VERSION} already installed. To use:" </ins> kube::log::info "export PATH="$(pwd)/etcd:${PATH}"" <del> ) </del> <ins> # export into current process PATH="$(pwd)/etcd:${PATH}" export PATH return  #already installed fi if [[ ${os} == "darwin" ]]; then download_file="etcd-v${ETCD_VERSION}-${os}-${arch}.zip" url="https://github.com/etcd-io/etcd/releases/download/v${ETCD_VERSION}/${download_file}" kube::util::download_file "${url}" "${download_file}" unzip -o "${download_file}" ln -fns "etcd-v${ETCD_VERSION}-${os}-${arch}" etcd rm "${download_file}" elif [[ ${os} == "linux" ]]; then url="https://github.com/coreos/etcd/releases/download/v${ETCD_VERSION}/etcd-v${ETCD_VERSION}-${os}-${arch}.tar.gz" download_file="etcd-v${ETCD_VERSION}-${os}-${arch}.tar.gz" kube::util::download_file "${url}" "${download_file}" tar xzf "${download_file}" ln -fns "etcd-v${ETCD_VERSION}-${os}-${arch}" etcd rm "${download_file}" else kube::log::info "${os} is NOT supported." fi kube::log::info "etcd v${ETCD_VERSION} installed. To use:" kube::log::info "export PATH="$(pwd)/etcd:${PATH}"" # export into current process PATH="$(pwd)/etcd:${PATH}" export PATH </ins> }
Code change:
we just log that the user should install etcd, which is impractical in an ephemeral container we actually already call installing etcd in the verify script, but we don't export it into the current PATH for the process so it doesn't work ... ref: /sig api-machinery /assign /kind bug
/triage accepted
for one possible fix
/sig etcd

Related discussion:
text: kube::util::require-jq kube::golang::setup_env <ins> kube::etcd::install </ins> make -C "${KUBE_ROOT}" WHAT=cmd/kube-apiserver
Code change:
we just log that the user should install etcd, which is impractical in an ephemeral container we actually already call installing etcd in the verify script, but we don't export it into the current PATH for the process so it doesn't work ... ref: /sig api-machinery /assign /kind bug
/triage accepted
for one possible fix
/sig etcd

Related discussion:
text: trap cleanup EXIT SIGINT <del> kube::golang::setup_env </del> TMP_DIR=${TMP_DIR:-$(kube::realpath "$(mktemp -d -t "$(basename "$0").XXXXXX")")} ETCD_HOST=${ETCD_HOST:-127.0.0.1} ETCD_PORT=${ETCD_PORT:-2379}
Code change:
Runs k8s with master golang: test Failure was observed on Aug 25th, it is passing after that. However it can be reproduced with stress tool. No response No response It is failing on both ppc and x86 architectures. Steps to reproduce: up golang tip version. clone kubernetes master /sig testing
This issue is currently awaiting triage. If a SIG or subproject determines this is a relevant issue, they will accept it by applying the label and provide further guidance. The label can be by org members by writing in a comment. <detailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available . If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the repository. </details
/assign
it is a sig node test, sig testing charter is not about doing or maintain tests, we need to remove that old mindset of having a QA department, that is not how software development works or should work :) Besides, thanks for spotting it and submittn a patch /sig node /remove-sig testing
Flaky in
merging this PR will fix the issue

Related discussion:
text: if err != nil { assert.NoErrorf(t, err, "unable to create temp file") } stdoutBuf := &bytes.Buffer{} stderrBuf := &bytes.Buffer{} containerID := "fake-container-id"
Code change:
Runs k8s with master golang: test Failure was observed on Aug 25th, it is passing after that. However it can be reproduced with stress tool. No response No response It is failing on both ppc and x86 architectures. Steps to reproduce: up golang tip version. clone kubernetes master /sig testing
This issue is currently awaiting triage. If a SIG or subproject determines this is a relevant issue, they will accept it by applying the label and provide further guidance. The label can be by org members by writing in a comment. <detailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available . If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the repository. </details
/assign
it is a sig node test, sig testing charter is not about doing or maintain tests, we need to remove that old mindset of having a QA department, that is not how software development works or should work :) Besides, thanks for spotting it and submittn a patch /sig node /remove-sig testing
Flaky in
merging this PR will fix the issue

Related discussion:
text: ctx, cancel := context.WithCancel(context.Background()) defer cancel() // Start to follow the container's log. <ins> fileName := file.Name() </ins> go func(ctx context.Context) { podLogOptions := v1.PodLogOptions{ Follow: true, } opts := NewLogOptions(&podLogOptions, time.Now()) <del> ReadLogs(ctx, file.Name(), containerID, opts, fakeRuntimeService, stdoutBuf, stderrBuf) </del> <ins> _ = ReadLogs(ctx, fileName, containerID, opts, fakeRuntimeService, stdoutBuf, stderrBuf) </ins> }(ctx) // log in stdout
Code change:
Runs k8s with master golang: test Failure was observed on Aug 25th, it is passing after that. However it can be reproduced with stress tool. No response No response It is failing on both ppc and x86 architectures. Steps to reproduce: up golang tip version. clone kubernetes master /sig testing
This issue is currently awaiting triage. If a SIG or subproject determines this is a relevant issue, they will accept it by applying the label and provide further guidance. The label can be by org members by writing in a comment. <detailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available . If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the repository. </details
/assign
it is a sig node test, sig testing charter is not about doing or maintain tests, we need to remove that old mindset of having a QA department, that is not how software development works or should work :) Besides, thanks for spotting it and submittn a patch /sig node /remove-sig testing
Flaky in
merging this PR will fix the issue

Related discussion:
text: // Write 10 lines to log file. // Let ReadLogs start. time.Sleep(50 * time.Millisecond) for line := 0; line < 10; line++ { // Write the first three lines to log file now := time.Now().Format(types.RFC3339NanoLenient)