Code change:
framework.ExpectNoError(waitErr, "some pods failed to complete within %v", completeTimeout) }) }) <del> ginkgo.Context("Pods sharing a single local PV [Serial]", func() { var ( pv *v1.PersistentVolume ) ginkgo.BeforeEach(func(ctx context.Context) { localVolume := &localTestVolume{ ltr: &utils.LocalTestResource{ Node: config.randomNode, Path: "/tmp", }, localVolumeType: DirectoryLocalVolumeType, } pvConfig := makeLocalPVConfig(config, localVolume) var err error pv, err = e2epv.CreatePV(ctx, config.client, f.Timeouts, e2epv.MakePersistentVolume(pvConfig)) framework.ExpectNoError(err) }) ginkgo.AfterEach(func(ctx context.Context) { if pv == nil { return } ginkgo.By(fmt.Sprintf("Clean PV %s", pv.Name)) err := config.client.CoreV1().PersistentVolumes().Delete(ctx, pv.Name, metav1.DeleteOptions{}) framework.ExpectNoError(err) }) ginkgo.It("all pods should be running", func(ctx context.Context) { var ( pvc   *v1.PersistentVolumeClaim pods  = map[string]*v1.Pod{} count = 2 err   error ) pvc = e2epv.MakePersistentVolumeClaim(makeLocalPVCConfig(config, DirectoryLocalVolumeType), config.ns) ginkgo.By(fmt.Sprintf("Create a PVC %s", pvc.Name)) pvc, err = e2epv.CreatePVC(ctx, config.client, config.ns, pvc) framework.ExpectNoError(err) ginkgo.By(fmt.Sprintf("Create %d pods to use this PVC", count)) podConfig := e2epod.Config{ NS:           config.ns, PVCs:         []*v1.PersistentVolumeClaim{pvc}, SeLinuxLabel: selinuxLabel, } for i := 0; i < count; i++ { pod, err := e2epod.MakeSecPod(&podConfig) framework.ExpectNoError(err) pod, err = config.client.CoreV1().Pods(config.ns).Create(ctx, pod, metav1.CreateOptions{}) framework.ExpectNoError(err) pods[pod.Name] = pod } ginkgo.By("Wait for all pods are running") const runningTimeout = 5 * time.Minute waitErr := wait.PollImmediate(time.Second, runningTimeout, func() (done bool, err error) { podsList, err := config.client.CoreV1().Pods(config.ns).List(ctx, metav1.ListOptions{}) if err != nil { return false, err } runningPods := 0 for _, pod := range podsList.Items { switch pod.Status.Phase { case v1.PodRunning: runningPods++ } } return runningPods == count, nil }) framework.ExpectNoError(waitErr, "Some pods are not running within %v", runningTimeout) }) }) </del> }) func deletePodAndPVCs(ctx context.Context, config *localTestConfig, pod *v1.Pod) error {

Related discussion:
text: During OPNFV test execution we noticed the folder selinux context changed. e2e test log How the folder changed after the test executed. I expected the TC won't change the selinux context. The question here, should this sigstorageserial TC set work on an selinux enabled K8S cluster or not? This question valid for the another sigstorage TC set with several test case, where selinux block a lot of TC too. See above. No response_ <details</details<detailsOpenStack </details<details</details<details</details<details</details<details</details
/sig testing
/sig storage
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues. This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules: After 90d of inactivity, is applied After 30d of inactivity since was applied, is applied After 30d of inactivity since was applied, the issue is closed You can: Mark this issue as fresh with Close this issue with Offer to help out with [Issue Triage][1] Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at . /lifecycle stale [1]:
/remove-lifecycle stale
/assign
Reproducer with simple kubernetes/kubernetes artifacts:
/triage accepted